{"meta":{"query_hash":"ed32b203643b","filters":{"topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism"},"cohort_total":864,"direct_labels_cover":133,"predictions_cover":864,"exported":864,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/ed32b203643b","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?topic=Academic+integrity+and+plagiarism"},"results":[{"id":"W104957292","doi":"10.14742/apubs.2008.2416","title":"Academic integrity compliance and education","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"ASCILITE Publications","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Academic integrity; Compliance (psychology); Research integrity; Engineering ethics; Psychology; Engineering; Social psychology","score_opus":0.103047058799333,"score_gpt":0.3743271646728122,"score_spread":0.27128010587347917,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W104957292","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06786531,0.006793243,0.028043607,0.3344316,0.0027216608,0.0005511415,0.00020856952,0.0015441816,0.5578407],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.849945,0.0025884628,0.011514228,0.029867837,0.0012443942,0.00035268447,0.00026957356,0.00036411523,0.10385363],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.8295815,0.062167104,0.013448355,0.011931351,0.06883969,0.014031913],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.5559905,0.16723125,0.08066359,0.048911564,0.09662313,0.050579965],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.10354042,0.0005667301,0.0010624491,0.006158981,0.015879536,0.028369442,0.004579595,0.009736431,0.029926386],"category_scores_gemma":[0.32278153,0.0009255035,0.0007375804,0.005424761,0.02427666,0.023102246,0.02883176,0.014087966,0.007959942],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000086120825,0.00083941,0.032153457,0.00050376536,0.00003492182,0.0006729875,0.038019154,0.00053826236,0.00048626796,0.3635926,0.10372631,0.45934665],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000547339,0.00039687168,0.023961408,0.0015098695,0.000033394124,0.0012438693,0.025049618,0.0010848683,0.0027506626,0.19029187,0.7534618,0.00016112693],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007635877,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00533759,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9902636,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014121869,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.048929513,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5475806},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W12723036","doi":"10.1139/g02-125","title":"Ethics of assessment: plagiarism authenticity & ownership","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Genome","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Information ethics; Engineering ethics; Internet privacy; Public relations; Business; Sociology; Computer science; Political science; Engineering","score_opus":0.04492964384209566,"score_gpt":0.35436379157171666,"score_spread":0.30943414772962097,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W12723036","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22810479,0.002239056,0.0645088,0.08764558,0.0068919486,0.029440751,0.0053543723,0.0011074685,0.5747072],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6716532,0.0008661952,0.022684302,0.010383775,0.0015670833,0.013883484,0.0012669067,0.00034676798,0.27734837],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.96538126,0.016153261,0.004496483,0.0022317362,0.0091296,0.0026076864],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.89067656,0.017565032,0.009301686,0.027731473,0.04557824,0.009147024],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.032139726,0.0003209873,0.0005417415,0.0012288843,0.002561609,0.0037634058,0.0015790083,0.0025271524,0.028709335],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09642052,0.00037113787,0.00029760104,0.00093012734,0.0029144015,0.0019228981,0.0034172775,0.002897971,0.011149443],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0015917709,0.000614778,0.06495021,0.0010541446,0.00006354711,0.0024124847,0.027840516,0.00048365328,0.01879715,0.12708439,0.3896018,0.36550564],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011034276,0.00040625146,0.058279578,0.0009323787,0.0000279538,0.0019241438,0.0077195475,0.0017712804,0.00452727,0.008559248,0.91564304,0.00009899232],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0049427813,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006914072,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9974728,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028692123,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011867281,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1699732},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1481948312","doi":"10.1111/j.1478-3231.2008.01753.x","title":"Cheating in scientific publishing: the scourge must stop!","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Liver International","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cheating; Publishing; The Internet; Scientific publishing; Internet privacy; Political science; Psychology; Law; Computer science; World Wide Web; Social psychology","score_opus":0.06648691236586772,"score_gpt":0.3073931902946208,"score_spread":0.24090627792875308,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1481948312","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0012547927,0.037246898,0.0018974686,0.91117257,0.034339294,0.000035513433,0.00004220177,0.0003653947,0.013645908],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.044905275,0.052219238,0.006653169,0.74586225,0.09890457,0.00017765899,0.00013343329,0.001039445,0.050105043],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.8750894,0.048254877,0.007873104,0.0063307798,0.05794985,0.0045019947],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.62225807,0.16424346,0.04257344,0.045100115,0.076467395,0.04935759],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.07882843,0.0013306,0.0025134936,0.004000227,0.018596565,0.049869098,0.0039335517,0.022815432,0.018607307],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2583957,0.0012977719,0.0018894146,0.005666664,0.04071714,0.04491454,0.016771322,0.037903603,0.02240114],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000078692516,0.0000514672,0.0012106136,0.0008568329,0.0001320675,0.00028334645,0.006799439,0.000047046127,0.00042133426,0.019191451,0.88722783,0.08369992],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000043885975,0.0001298514,0.0012776774,0.0017217904,0.000048440044,0.00084520906,0.0055938936,0.000115232695,0.00034616096,0.033648927,0.9561185,0.0001103268],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024895913,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0038981447,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9771846,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007668127,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01840634,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41688955},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1488946506","doi":"10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00877","title":"Social-cognitive barriers to ethical authorship","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Frontiers in Psychology","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Cognition; Social psychology; Cognitive psychology; Psychiatry","score_opus":0.07162183964555364,"score_gpt":0.42285878778232877,"score_spread":0.35123694813677514,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1488946506","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22695751,0.0013521396,0.020484507,0.12477845,0.0009384254,0.0002056481,0.0001454229,0.00012107878,0.6250168],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.987982,0.00019597929,0.0013207078,0.0033618077,0.00034842623,0.0000434854,0.000032424516,0.000035612313,0.0066795386],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.951189,0.030385701,0.002946193,0.0029689493,0.009054919,0.0034552154],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.5421593,0.350029,0.04766891,0.020806057,0.024827594,0.014509158],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.047305472,0.00032679044,0.00041047295,0.0025397,0.007945072,0.010030304,0.0013133673,0.00483654,0.031582486],"category_scores_gemma":[0.29604146,0.0003439747,0.0004321239,0.0014114785,0.01322352,0.0067252824,0.0073543983,0.00638892,0.0026401756],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001744222,0.00027635062,0.041663356,0.00035651927,0.00009239883,0.0015452581,0.10563363,0.0005728008,0.0013827973,0.72714233,0.04030265,0.0808575],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011952872,0.000099767465,0.027193137,0.0007560787,0.00006622675,0.0014656024,0.0727346,0.0019264724,0.0012388851,0.7535802,0.14072011,0.00009920617],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002573567,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0055505596,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99516344,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0044898978,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0081147505,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25017828},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1491422701","doi":"","title":"Avoiding the Plagiarism Pitfall: Preventing Plagiarism in Undergraduate Research","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Plagiarism detection; Worry; Cheating; Work (physics); Process (computing); Academic integrity; Computer science; Engineering ethics; Internet privacy; Medical education; Psychology; Engineering; Medicine; Social psychology","score_opus":0.06893632038766458,"score_gpt":0.3967930270592775,"score_spread":0.32785670667161293,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1491422701","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.46261325,0.0124419145,0.36768678,0.08451448,0.0014730432,0.004360356,0.00021958495,0.010463537,0.056227047],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8073345,0.0018703067,0.17806013,0.0034930368,0.00075078895,0.00073775573,0.00017114723,0.0004960283,0.007086347],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9575269,0.021545509,0.0035504901,0.0036711285,0.012290603,0.0014153237],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.70660317,0.12748067,0.056228556,0.05377182,0.04091898,0.014996786],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.052866872,0.0012068046,0.0012104425,0.0071457927,0.010047397,0.007701158,0.0044988985,0.005002358,0.0042491667],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2635756,0.0012808199,0.0006445057,0.0033567236,0.0051886127,0.013365389,0.011343293,0.005430079,0.004081732],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00049546454,0.001160825,0.039257247,0.001868232,0.000120009114,0.0009263098,0.033365533,0.0013973648,0.010760107,0.010551651,0.030721232,0.869376],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014726021,0.00842262,0.23743607,0.00820368,0.0013029255,0.025698146,0.05854622,0.055020683,0.09187092,0.18080865,0.32985955,0.0013579208],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016236146,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025443342,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9949976,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027035088,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013294701,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27959013},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["research_integrity"],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"methods","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["research_integrity"],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"commentary","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W1491625350","doi":"10.21913/ijei.v9i2.887","title":"Editorial Volume 9(2)","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal for Educational Integrity","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Volume (thermodynamics); Environmental science; Thermodynamics; Physics","score_opus":0.02895376262512629,"score_gpt":0.3876490836946617,"score_spread":0.35869532106953544,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1491625350","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000068334106,0.003647528,0.00021024072,0.019010583,0.9249416,0.000075091215,0.0003316983,0.00047625072,0.051238682],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0010682096,0.005531874,0.00037179983,0.032170042,0.6654889,0.00010993536,0.0007219776,0.0004335139,0.29410374],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971163,0.0003248154,0.0002542452,0.00046840913,0.0015545944,0.00028161146],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9883128,0.0016369937,0.0007053529,0.00093053776,0.0057212734,0.0026930226],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026449403,0.0018764891,0.0018641568,0.0034430465,0.0020899593,0.007896951,0.00272811,0.0067125945,0.42217878],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017250149,0.00074433285,0.0018318081,0.0017431091,0.0012108784,0.003988014,0.0023738523,0.006304048,0.36366972],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001154249,0.000008564482,0.000019166311,0.00008764177,0.0000022217193,0.000037619986,0.000004726194,0.000008132487,0.00003363908,0.00017130714,0.98993623,0.009679195],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009170906,0.0000073679757,0.00007275733,0.0001355325,0.000003009955,0.000059715137,0.000013891132,0.00001306869,0.000025795338,0.00020712288,0.9994485,0.000003971239],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001336476,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027902897,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9932874,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001563039,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026655227,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8241918},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1502821115","doi":"10.1007/s12630-011-9523-5","title":"Academic fraud: perspectives from a lifelong anesthesia researcher","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"editorial","venue":"Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d anesthésie","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba; Research Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Anesthesia; Medicine; Medical education","score_opus":0.02553388892708346,"score_gpt":0.2855534318008133,"score_spread":0.2600195428737298,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1502821115","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00024937384,0.0048758276,0.000062082174,0.59365577,0.3995753,0.000008718058,0.000017943617,0.000016623346,0.0015383417],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0043771183,0.004645289,0.00013675488,0.28500468,0.7000008,0.000027955319,0.000011509157,0.00004512937,0.00575069],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9724195,0.0077860863,0.0037703803,0.0025396363,0.010721002,0.0027634483],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7701814,0.14016016,0.009204221,0.0043167695,0.049864214,0.026273156],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.030247914,0.002784584,0.0034111445,0.0044865143,0.01629147,0.025778785,0.006500348,0.116092496,0.0063300435],"category_scores_gemma":[0.18488552,0.0015619575,0.0023725678,0.0035605275,0.010463342,0.010311039,0.00447869,0.068047844,0.0028443728],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014570653,0.000011602421,0.00010390375,0.000104997474,0.000016226239,0.0006204181,0.0004102994,0.000015763933,0.000019676096,0.0009155131,0.995698,0.0020691424],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007274951,0.00003989722,0.00085153565,0.0013640139,0.00011019116,0.0016097774,0.0032432994,0.00017439607,0.00008953695,0.0030718322,0.9892926,0.00008021113],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007995782,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02594336,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9697521,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011114479,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016874354,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15996814},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1504334680","doi":"","title":"Sources and Information in Academic Research: Avoiding Mistakes in Assessing Sources for Research and during Peer Review","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Credibility; Newspaper; Variety (cybernetics); German; Research integrity; Academic integrity; Public relations; Academic community; Library science; Political science; Sociology; Media studies; Law; History; Computer science","score_opus":0.6180195238489408,"score_gpt":0.6524922800243458,"score_spread":0.03447275617540502,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1504334680","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018960157,0.03146954,0.36655575,0.3696493,0.06950425,0.017522765,0.0025635737,0.010666098,0.11310866],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2286459,0.025122391,0.5718133,0.044440337,0.031616215,0.026769143,0.004167137,0.010171745,0.05725391],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.26157808,0.4682871,0.09847132,0.016860848,0.15050174,0.004300931],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.052291617,0.34785587,0.060809556,0.13053197,0.39789185,0.010619153],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.62288755,0.0026755661,0.0054883948,0.041925695,0.018241586,0.060195513,0.010138424,0.013791258,0.018776996],"category_scores_gemma":[0.87819344,0.004970313,0.0019139771,0.036837686,0.019407311,0.05406172,0.030081466,0.016872544,0.039720014],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022647572,0.00013312703,0.0069057993,0.0057478365,0.00037219332,0.0010283567,0.058636736,0.00052710494,0.0017063646,0.037404098,0.43637404,0.45093787],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011960938,0.00012692066,0.006325122,0.012220057,0.00027969174,0.0008710834,0.023180848,0.0022465987,0.0019880293,0.07974763,0.87238383,0.0005105244],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0044029984,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007917507,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98620874,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014145536,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06833397,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.46504682},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch"],"domain":"methods","study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"methods","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["scholarly_communication"],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"commentary","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W1512296044","doi":"10.18438/b8wk7b","title":"University Student and Faculty Opinions on Academic Integrity Are Informed by Social Practices or Personal Values","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Evidence Based Library and Information Practice","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kingston Health Sciences Centre; Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Cheating; Academic integrity; Psychology; Medical education; Medicine; Social psychology","score_opus":0.06131907902301849,"score_gpt":0.3793160799804908,"score_spread":0.3179970009574723,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1512296044","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2500324,0.058171246,0.01317546,0.30386826,0.005169814,0.0003829026,0.0003108129,0.00013355257,0.3687556],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9541913,0.016871234,0.0025121374,0.016582241,0.0013913574,0.00014560865,0.00008664014,0.00006910744,0.008150297],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.904909,0.06572205,0.005900305,0.002663908,0.017914897,0.0028899326],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8116031,0.12044076,0.02478099,0.007868288,0.029809508,0.0054972842],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03606551,0.000455177,0.00079638464,0.0036024698,0.006959029,0.012804091,0.0010329231,0.0032713104,0.0054919566],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11428818,0.00038295615,0.00060541293,0.0034593772,0.023921369,0.0087815905,0.007218025,0.0039847693,0.001063219],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016331639,0.00026619298,0.049350925,0.0037553783,0.00028885715,0.0016480456,0.43225175,0.00030046646,0.0033683514,0.10692003,0.06711696,0.33456963],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024540283,0.00021409613,0.040473837,0.0063621732,0.00012290086,0.0011007693,0.37761018,0.00028558416,0.0023623027,0.05357436,0.51767266,0.00019663689],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002459366,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0046895347,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9967287,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004157914,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011652939,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19073492},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1517566539","doi":"10.22329/celt.v5i0.3403","title":"11. Referencing and Citation for Graduate Students: Gain Without Pain","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Collected Essays on Learning and Teaching","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Formative assessment; Citation; Class (philosophy); Graduate students; Mathematics education; Psychology; Pedagogy; Medical education; Computer science; Medicine; Library science","score_opus":0.05199606378351931,"score_gpt":0.355288857287787,"score_spread":0.3032927935042677,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1517566539","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"reporting","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"reporting","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19367218,0.006210483,0.11336167,0.12619472,0.0054842355,0.00083566713,0.00038507706,0.0037564414,0.55009955],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.70730174,0.0046210485,0.11991462,0.008454795,0.0040384014,0.00044834017,0.00035383855,0.0006591286,0.15420808],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9928063,0.003054192,0.00038817772,0.00043087464,0.0028877363,0.00043255815],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96725714,0.010714834,0.003449963,0.0071940855,0.008228218,0.0031557388],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009866915,0.0004368659,0.0005410276,0.0016046851,0.0028512445,0.0077696443,0.001414791,0.002016622,0.019644449],"category_scores_gemma":[0.052342128,0.00028548716,0.0004550274,0.0018416159,0.0037528635,0.007473953,0.00768628,0.0022896433,0.00925633],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012517124,0.00046106748,0.0059079253,0.00059017615,0.000014946494,0.0005616735,0.029463647,0.00019715406,0.0060556717,0.059795644,0.06382046,0.8330065],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013994523,0.0011167733,0.02296838,0.0011097571,0.00007876875,0.005123152,0.036968857,0.001562263,0.012250561,0.13414124,0.7843864,0.00015391613],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000661682,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022887352,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9901331,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015684599,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0043052933,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06571722},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1519480405","doi":"","title":"The Corporate Corruption of Academic Research","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alternate routes","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Language change; Political science; Business; Accounting; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.24641320630322722,"score_gpt":0.43089103284756863,"score_spread":0.18447782654434142,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1519480405","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.30310726,0.0078506535,0.01390402,0.13821262,0.000452536,0.000068359805,0.00017624586,0.000114454924,0.5361138],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99157774,0.0007744846,0.0005207057,0.001134986,0.00021692648,0.000015318437,0.00001649595,0.00001877198,0.0057245633],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9716787,0.018458845,0.0010473672,0.001289482,0.0053063487,0.0022193145],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.82037216,0.09406516,0.033188205,0.02299301,0.021215977,0.008165455],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017759059,0.00020995954,0.00053549797,0.00475376,0.006713542,0.020750327,0.0012656081,0.0047100578,0.007813098],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10119566,0.00043537543,0.00034789694,0.005596563,0.030447802,0.013400469,0.006884416,0.00576763,0.0010009139],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000059493283,0.000053715416,0.015309367,0.00007554505,0.000026370819,0.00013340364,0.006618938,0.00033759073,0.00010116249,0.95598423,0.004835395,0.016464734],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000068871945,0.00009582151,0.029464874,0.0005437479,0.00005515917,0.00057383295,0.014766026,0.00222405,0.0009305519,0.8977218,0.053490423,0.0000647768],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029635786,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0037933292,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9952899,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005036883,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007712601,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09391999},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1534434694","doi":"10.22329/celt.v7i1.3998","title":"Institutional Strategies that Foster Academic Integrity: A Faculty-Based Case Study","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Collected Essays on Learning and Teaching","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"","keywords":"Misconduct; Academic integrity; Medical education; Intervention (counseling); Psychology; Higher education; Strategic planning; Plan (archaeology); Medicine; Political science; Management; Social psychology","score_opus":0.05674084967602775,"score_gpt":0.35970822599484675,"score_spread":0.302967376318819,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1534434694","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98384136,0.000235775,0.0037411784,0.004332497,0.000050242597,0.00065051875,0.000037743324,0.000055656357,0.007055031],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9914608,0.0004071473,0.004847016,0.0007212465,0.000040277322,0.00033639328,0.000024016103,0.000017542794,0.0021455248],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.96428716,0.026732152,0.0009811874,0.0010507137,0.0030118988,0.0039368784],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9601428,0.019643525,0.005704311,0.0031269912,0.0044874386,0.00689495],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019416997,0.0006959905,0.0006013173,0.0031372476,0.023975946,0.004630498,0.0045658103,0.006010683,0.0026072566],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0508695,0.0006074665,0.0008054905,0.002794766,0.007262183,0.0037632217,0.006196043,0.0039468464,0.00043500296],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00036376299,0.016149538,0.11887395,0.0006264415,0.00010760851,0.029064387,0.67816997,0.0029669544,0.0023495355,0.01788458,0.0078083747,0.12563488],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001285894,0.0042379256,0.021534983,0.00046381133,0.00007509692,0.011139686,0.9110349,0.0030483222,0.0056219096,0.003127866,0.039449714,0.0001371592],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011639218,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03378057,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9939893,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0107021555,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0136097185,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10268813},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1552657171","doi":"10.1007/s12630-009-9087-9","title":"Special notice to readers and authors on scientific misconduct","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"editorial","venue":"Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d anesthésie","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ottawa Hospital","funders":"","keywords":"Notice; Scientific misconduct; Misconduct; Political science; Law; Psychology; Medicine; Alternative medicine; Pathology","score_opus":0.019036558374258276,"score_gpt":0.26678484383111456,"score_spread":0.2477482854568563,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1552657171","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00010189631,0.0011461609,0.00020403696,0.074010216,0.9191881,0.00006305616,0.00008161809,0.0001961486,0.0050088177],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0016865942,0.0016930016,0.00067748775,0.0843061,0.8477233,0.00013501977,0.000157762,0.00019832543,0.06342236],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.976394,0.0037292521,0.003967558,0.0017764926,0.012713693,0.0014189826],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.77308935,0.06642435,0.02309065,0.009173958,0.116135985,0.012085696],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.023791365,0.0033832514,0.0046337694,0.007853875,0.0072277808,0.012608739,0.004733113,0.041737076,0.056848906],"category_scores_gemma":[0.16418476,0.0019300964,0.0037799033,0.003767217,0.0036262674,0.0048492695,0.0027284005,0.023642495,0.04793653],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018507659,0.000011198827,0.00003833132,0.000055262095,0.000009771628,0.00010683708,0.000015279125,0.000007746865,0.000036022648,0.000100902645,0.99689364,0.0027063934],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000095384275,0.00005046778,0.00073396484,0.00056143914,0.000080625294,0.00047873368,0.00021462077,0.00032839435,0.00030343892,0.0017394839,0.99535525,0.00005816467],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030186279,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00908949,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99458206,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00541793,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008573606,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19017857},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W155298354","doi":"","title":"utilización de la plataforma hadoop para la detección de potencial plagio con indicadores de probabilidad de certeza de las táreas enviadas a un sistema de administración de cursos (aplicable para sidweb o metis)","year":2010,"lang":"es","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Physics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.017137249856617,"score_gpt":0.3341958641859531,"score_spread":0.3170586143293361,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W155298354","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24457303,0.00045315115,0.67171717,0.0019718597,0.00037356373,0.0022090143,0.005439922,0.070520915,0.002741443],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4544591,0.000108192355,0.5413239,0.00012821378,0.0000315488,0.00054803235,0.0019622322,0.0005581327,0.0008806842],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9941806,0.0018754962,0.00086888584,0.0010447219,0.0016121105,0.00041812673],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96712697,0.018944465,0.0018598892,0.004509566,0.006422363,0.0011367219],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008872605,0.0014251026,0.0013674325,0.0017971685,0.0015610869,0.0021001915,0.0015401542,0.0007365591,0.0019125773],"category_scores_gemma":[0.034538817,0.00086458557,0.0009608316,0.0021842145,0.0008852657,0.0032593855,0.0011258267,0.0020599174,0.00047374997],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.002424143,0.0013022623,0.045888547,0.0012299179,0.00069893926,0.00044308024,0.00160307,0.19445428,0.027589593,0.004704685,0.022662502,0.6969991],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017780844,0.00015681561,0.0032887713,0.000032917644,0.0000793038,0.00008183702,0.0003316192,0.9741261,0.014487177,0.0043285647,0.0028559512,0.000053101186],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.025306959,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.025494345,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99926347,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013380585,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005542811,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.050319314},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1554365104","doi":"10.21913/ijei.v1i1.14","title":"Cheating among college and university students: A North American perspective","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal for Educational Integrity","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":444,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cheating; Academic integrity; Perspective (graphical); Academic dishonesty; Higher education; Psychology; Mathematics education; Medical education; Political science; Sociology; Social psychology; Medicine; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.021585796284891455,"score_gpt":0.3815879098520392,"score_spread":0.3600021135671478,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1554365104","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6676853,0.016898276,0.00025103873,0.2578129,0.00065937825,0.000032890308,0.00020410756,0.000010368085,0.0564458],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93968,0.019218704,0.00014692429,0.035366315,0.0010543453,0.000024056591,0.00007152219,0.000011480649,0.0044266027],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9955356,0.0021975397,0.00019359105,0.00033344558,0.00074644585,0.000993394],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98515886,0.005793468,0.002386047,0.00031265253,0.002852948,0.0034960085],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0044289585,0.0002467972,0.00059013756,0.0035964516,0.012068734,0.005917789,0.0010480707,0.0039763018,0.006479625],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008058782,0.00028244525,0.00040083815,0.0052206283,0.006317228,0.0060186447,0.0029210364,0.004639326,0.00051602506],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019923649,0.0009226388,0.51586556,0.00048212128,0.00010480068,0.003386828,0.31445748,0.0001165099,0.0007047841,0.029634006,0.043313205,0.09081283],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001746546,0.0002280707,0.4767551,0.00081501045,0.00006127023,0.0013409612,0.45932886,0.00016256042,0.000179297,0.004104664,0.056940615,0.00006610187],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.17094153,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4090026,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9960237,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008080763,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0069438154,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3398931},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1560597338","doi":"10.18438/b8b619","title":"The Launch of a Joint Library/Writing Centre Online Course on Academic Integrity","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Evidence Based Library and Information Practice","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Mount Royal University","funders":"","keywords":"Academic integrity; Higher education; Information literacy; Citation; Academic writing; Computer science; Library instruction; Learning Management; Library science; Medical education; World Wide Web; Pedagogy; Psychology; Medicine; Political science","score_opus":0.026856804963296795,"score_gpt":0.3041778787669937,"score_spread":0.2773210738036969,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1560597338","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.79295105,0.00033342306,0.016898276,0.027066553,0.0016240182,0.0027720015,0.00025492138,0.0015155035,0.15658425],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8521663,0.0002586879,0.05310776,0.0020578825,0.00057842967,0.00094713387,0.0003389259,0.00030381008,0.09024107],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99167585,0.0039666006,0.0002849786,0.0005087056,0.0019848424,0.0015789674],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9610981,0.0045864293,0.002160236,0.0018704539,0.0039134636,0.026371416],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014733672,0.00035624937,0.0003671854,0.0009071408,0.00517456,0.005900051,0.002431676,0.0021807058,0.015571582],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022247138,0.0004074768,0.00050486793,0.00048512506,0.002404376,0.004326323,0.010102735,0.0039722305,0.004052168],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012434279,0.014082264,0.04385929,0.0005626072,0.000039102877,0.006703883,0.08410755,0.0017830002,0.011285497,0.018971004,0.0942984,0.7230641],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00041100834,0.008552669,0.06312189,0.0004922025,0.000044581717,0.002351782,0.08606609,0.005233307,0.029045029,0.0079621775,0.7964662,0.0002531347],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018760024,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0072472584,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9978193,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0048982697,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015466325,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07792002},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"},{"model":"gpt","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"commentary","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W1566603691","doi":"10.18438/b8t89c","title":"Plagiarism Curricula May Reduce Need for Punitive Plagiarism Education","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Evidence Based Library and Information Practice","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Medical education; Citation; Curriculum; Cheating; Psychology; Test (biology); Academic integrity; Punitive damages; Mathematics education; Medicine; Library science; Pedagogy; Computer science","score_opus":0.016414724676141215,"score_gpt":0.3123456484541199,"score_spread":0.2959309237779787,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1566603691","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9552141,0.0010438762,0.007766301,0.0060986974,0.000141664,0.0006153025,0.00006664068,0.00057091593,0.028482515],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9795363,0.00045773684,0.013701888,0.000645954,0.000065561304,0.00040927407,0.000065873355,0.00003974606,0.0050777313],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99364024,0.0029898817,0.00037555664,0.0004911434,0.0019199667,0.0005831104],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9651017,0.015021123,0.009134688,0.0023814489,0.0045714425,0.0037895697],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0074105123,0.00031836267,0.00038438293,0.0016768315,0.0025799347,0.0024575547,0.0019372755,0.0010656569,0.0084986575],"category_scores_gemma":[0.045557156,0.00031033935,0.00035920803,0.0010329231,0.0012418099,0.002335367,0.003503034,0.0012422452,0.0012974816],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024285019,0.006523782,0.08573614,0.0020157197,0.00005707219,0.0003835907,0.036868367,0.00067690446,0.006255772,0.0037386836,0.009817548,0.84768355],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00049107306,0.0069030267,0.7428687,0.002933288,0.00016591177,0.0010227881,0.053112403,0.0022106091,0.014630699,0.009458139,0.16601221,0.00019110738],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010072625,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031434903,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9989343,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022169708,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007946508,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.039191008},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["research_integrity"],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["research_integrity"],"domain":null,"study_design":"design_other","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W1571989326","doi":"10.4000/sociologies.4728","title":"La restitution des savoirs, entre courtoisie, transfert de connaissances et geste politique","year":2021,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"SociologieS","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Restitution; Humanities; Political science; Sociology; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.062053068136657966,"score_gpt":0.35706719352887706,"score_spread":0.2950141253922191,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1571989326","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1996968,0.0038553397,0.046157166,0.038183957,0.00065686315,0.00009827778,0.00010489788,0.00016433101,0.71108234],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.970791,0.0004902097,0.0023368844,0.001056256,0.00015572141,0.0000753516,0.000026085656,0.00007929018,0.024989245],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9793509,0.012628816,0.00071663846,0.00249857,0.0031558902,0.0016491483],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9770259,0.010064813,0.0029565208,0.005343254,0.003190676,0.0014187708],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014021078,0.0005005126,0.00086491223,0.00237735,0.013178547,0.01580586,0.0018470417,0.004408916,0.007120394],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03059607,0.0004085382,0.0006626548,0.0022784448,0.073055856,0.010942823,0.010600358,0.0064485422,0.0010255475],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019299418,0.0000123578475,0.0009747733,0.000035901,0.0000099064555,0.00006754002,0.040925015,0.00005635898,0.00031640087,0.952064,0.00054806034,0.0049703787],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002109545,0.00007235304,0.0037878843,0.0002745527,0.00002245558,0.0002301832,0.0341112,0.0002662772,0.0011066621,0.8372587,0.12279911,0.000049511687],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0068272846,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005620908,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9868215,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006715116,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006264207,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07415146},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1573641917","doi":"10.18438/b87g61","title":"Searching for Adverse Effects in MEDLINE and EMBASE Requires a Combined Approach for Efficient Retrieval","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Evidence Based Library and Information Practice","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"MEDLINE; Adverse effect; Cochrane Library; Information retrieval; Medicine; Controlled vocabulary; Computer science; Meta-analysis; Pharmacology; Internal medicine","score_opus":0.015872657935911805,"score_gpt":0.295463038146149,"score_spread":0.2795903802102372,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1573641917","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009271896,0.27648202,0.1903546,0.0924434,0.01463819,0.21227214,0.12208614,0.009409543,0.07304213],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.016640177,0.1621204,0.5913315,0.012686305,0.0041409493,0.1624965,0.030781569,0.0015621998,0.01824052],"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.86306643,0.048527498,0.06746246,0.0038963228,0.015867332,0.001179993],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.5431819,0.3309996,0.050513882,0.0154993385,0.057083968,0.0027213057],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.08991758,0.0034689512,0.0150096435,0.08167033,0.0021338887,0.009354034,0.004631639,0.004073605,0.106014065],"category_scores_gemma":[0.30976337,0.0034479352,0.0073708445,0.07681723,0.0035753846,0.012974453,0.007986098,0.004361285,0.033634685],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007288343,0.000117777854,0.0011275151,0.41763112,0.0020196242,0.0011237274,0.0026705544,0.0005389644,0.0036612963,0.005527431,0.15682624,0.4080269],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001356458,0.0005226926,0.00736953,0.33081573,0.0046399413,0.0014750175,0.0017208931,0.0020974455,0.0023454337,0.019003587,0.6280105,0.000642735],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006834472,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016542407,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9100824,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010363656,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.038740706,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47553527},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1575402393","doi":"10.25071/1497-3170.2467","title":"Studio Courses and Academic Honesty","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"CORE","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Studio; Honesty; Psychology; Mathematics education; Visual arts; Art; Social psychology","score_opus":0.07261657480420174,"score_gpt":0.36223254537431304,"score_spread":0.2896159705701113,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1575402393","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.53167063,0.0028725683,0.0043709213,0.024572548,0.00023106215,0.000036656886,0.00009158486,0.00005425349,0.43609968],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9920854,0.00019671745,0.0001574343,0.00027804484,0.000108061526,0.0000074013324,0.000012382859,0.000008160572,0.007146322],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9952991,0.0024377895,0.00022706568,0.000358166,0.00086790154,0.00080992235],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.91388637,0.04679675,0.018909192,0.004709239,0.0057484596,0.009950044],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004873158,0.00020560651,0.0004019126,0.0018289186,0.0036728582,0.00726394,0.0008664349,0.002109488,0.018913683],"category_scores_gemma":[0.043900155,0.00021722482,0.000267919,0.0012455378,0.008186098,0.0047848336,0.00497809,0.0040777875,0.0010108746],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007858372,0.0010802062,0.07546139,0.00017358325,0.00006582618,0.00048416262,0.026305784,0.00043862194,0.00062636955,0.8119501,0.00997063,0.07265745],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015384465,0.0003524667,0.13409734,0.00030003945,0.00007491285,0.0008115827,0.02550035,0.0019182292,0.0013369244,0.79950696,0.035882305,0.000065001426],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013668395,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020102425,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99789053,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025538236,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025841014,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.063272595},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1575509464","doi":"10.21913/ijei.v8i1.782","title":"How do faculty members respond to their students' discussions of academic misconduct and academic integrity?","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal for Educational Integrity","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Academic integrity; Misconduct; Presentation (obstetrics); Psychology; Context (archaeology); Medical education; Academic institution; Qualitative research; Perception; Pedagogy; Social psychology; Medicine; Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.1208383388445477,"score_gpt":0.4745050081811505,"score_spread":0.3536666693366028,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1575509464","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9845359,0.000545789,0.0022864793,0.0068194293,0.00013655999,0.00007222607,0.000037371396,0.000042654738,0.00552363],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9959863,0.00032979366,0.0006639527,0.0010117445,0.00006675011,0.000062362655,0.000019344085,0.000022657881,0.0018371167],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9690062,0.023701243,0.00091159524,0.000815704,0.0029379153,0.0026273518],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.91716564,0.053720403,0.013499124,0.0023038238,0.007031371,0.006279628],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020558909,0.00037032872,0.00059577404,0.0016599385,0.009850549,0.0074847178,0.0018784316,0.0030193613,0.0036131057],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09331468,0.00047136238,0.0005218785,0.0016111565,0.0067106774,0.004973673,0.005498847,0.003547368,0.0008205773],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000088525725,0.00009083687,0.019511512,0.00011663239,0.00001545686,0.00045466973,0.95884424,0.000059341888,0.0011119355,0.00078486156,0.0010218598,0.01790008],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000536014,0.00010390125,0.006665849,0.00010133094,0.000011519859,0.00027924895,0.9832729,0.00008314344,0.0010433826,0.00036240777,0.008042539,0.000028414828],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025849864,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0042070695,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99698067,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005024515,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006143633,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10872722},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1575780569","doi":"10.1023/a:1025008818338","title":"Student Reports and Faculty Perceptions of Academic Dishonesty","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Teaching Business Ethics","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":83,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"PricewaterhouseCoopers (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Cheating; Academic dishonesty; Honor; Academic integrity; Psychology; Ethical code; Mathematics education; Sociology; Social psychology; Law; Computer science; Political science","score_opus":0.08864809106080487,"score_gpt":0.4209462456888834,"score_spread":0.33229815462807855,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1575780569","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9936811,0.00018099337,0.00014945252,0.0013722882,0.00004431007,0.000015501606,0.000032608008,0.0000147499,0.0045089866],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999022,0.00012507927,0.000050599338,0.00021726785,0.000041462896,0.0000065757285,0.000021671603,0.000007581129,0.00050776184],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9812821,0.009920634,0.0017664523,0.0004819943,0.0049570184,0.0015916975],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.5765867,0.19001473,0.14624786,0.008993118,0.039477084,0.038680404],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020227013,0.00028087242,0.0005207262,0.003790964,0.0033059902,0.007535913,0.0010357379,0.0017271618,0.005001262],"category_scores_gemma":[0.18388261,0.00040538728,0.00043587963,0.0024736065,0.0037449314,0.0026907595,0.0044003176,0.003984258,0.00071097247],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00060774974,0.000801731,0.8453836,0.00015054068,0.0001365979,0.00041488706,0.12518659,0.0001734427,0.0011605807,0.0016732633,0.002510018,0.021800913],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000665894,0.00093184423,0.6941228,0.00021536791,0.0001035908,0.00074451516,0.29183593,0.0006895651,0.001799679,0.0011960394,0.008166936,0.00012723454],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029225424,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035019473,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99827284,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025580795,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036081497,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10697198},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1606412596","doi":"10.22329/celt.v4i0.3277","title":"13. Linking Academic Integrity and Classroom Civility: Student Attitudes and Institutional Response","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Collected Essays on Learning and Teaching","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"","keywords":"Civility; Academic dishonesty; Incivility; Academic integrity; Cheating; Psychology; Intervention (counseling); Institution; Social psychology; Pedagogy; Sociology; Political science; Law; Social science","score_opus":0.04166183233391878,"score_gpt":0.33561763115828136,"score_spread":0.29395579882436257,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1606412596","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99399453,0.00005283083,0.00025058197,0.0007246554,0.000009616585,0.000023512097,0.00001927911,0.000008478153,0.0049166586],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989365,0.00004162145,0.0001250421,0.00011441256,0.0000060036687,0.000016186334,0.000015907539,0.0000021336098,0.00074221933],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99313664,0.0037961267,0.00050956546,0.00027505268,0.0014282907,0.0008543929],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9614958,0.011991185,0.015299831,0.0022976135,0.0046118796,0.004303644],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0073591173,0.00020371268,0.00031381802,0.0009516367,0.0023669186,0.0038272133,0.000784287,0.0012164349,0.0058428957],"category_scores_gemma":[0.035988055,0.00021917462,0.00042049866,0.00079683133,0.0031508682,0.0016484924,0.0032009387,0.0018662598,0.0008027462],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000100647165,0.0006626686,0.8774603,0.00011838433,0.00004612773,0.00025007,0.09185578,0.000117577154,0.0014587437,0.0014803137,0.00058848265,0.025861006],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011094,0.00055623066,0.77353877,0.00009002004,0.0000308045,0.00029239547,0.21738283,0.00032627222,0.0021168687,0.0015110043,0.0041021253,0.000041511525],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002163312,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033733516,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9987836,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001254374,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015770256,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03891921},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1731370542","doi":"","title":"Plagiarism Education: Strategies for Instructors","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Learning Teaching and Educational Research","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Plagiarism detection; Psychology; Medical education; Mathematics education; Focus (optics); Computer science; Medicine; Physics","score_opus":0.1469886411925829,"score_gpt":0.49729891436485957,"score_spread":0.3503102731722767,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1731370542","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.42589527,0.016364649,0.23529014,0.10312792,0.0019825515,0.006005163,0.00026098738,0.019745683,0.19132768],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6967346,0.0069543933,0.22569436,0.0053141755,0.0007810218,0.0026361912,0.0003779104,0.00053084793,0.060976528],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957664,0.0024157106,0.00027460445,0.00037579393,0.0008233268,0.00034419505],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9760761,0.011477467,0.002854504,0.0018349257,0.0036448955,0.004112132],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0085544875,0.0012097573,0.0007430246,0.0028046558,0.0044671753,0.005817513,0.0029081935,0.002806732,0.014394339],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028322445,0.00047129925,0.00059038145,0.0011408612,0.0012037983,0.0069901296,0.0047814376,0.0025290705,0.005588335],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000117770585,0.0023762886,0.013463972,0.0011353419,0.000023582032,0.000520147,0.03670623,0.00024288842,0.00398545,0.0029101393,0.03134307,0.9071752],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00042989373,0.0040657544,0.04679836,0.0055435235,0.00037517748,0.0054953657,0.18951604,0.0065389904,0.017370662,0.040371533,0.68306726,0.00042757383],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000636932,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014206026,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9971933,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011554979,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034842454,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.048153877},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["research_integrity"],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"methods","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["research_integrity"],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"commentary","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W1756786833","doi":"10.5020/18061230.2015.p1","title":"Cultura de integridade em pesquisa: somos agentes promotores","year":2015,"lang":"pt","type":"article","venue":"Revista Brasileira em Promoção da saúde","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Honesty; Promotion (chess); Political science; Public relations; Sociology; Library science; Law","score_opus":0.08103088589114929,"score_gpt":0.34587820524861906,"score_spread":0.26484731935746975,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1756786833","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20673785,0.2951958,0.008399553,0.09549417,0.0027664492,0.00034204038,0.00051068445,0.00016450616,0.39038894],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.84259206,0.11665755,0.007111197,0.0037573967,0.0008292973,0.00021102146,0.00016512732,0.000041259864,0.028635118],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964281,0.0016105289,0.00016418076,0.00040822828,0.0009374345,0.00045163144],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964966,0.0012553261,0.0005485821,0.00024820908,0.00068999326,0.0007613291],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0044593634,0.0006583488,0.00063417596,0.004210983,0.003945688,0.005415598,0.0010648282,0.0014665108,0.009288359],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0042471876,0.00036807134,0.0006123045,0.004422668,0.006627964,0.0027741627,0.0048330114,0.0020790119,0.00072351284],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019065682,0.00046121687,0.049266096,0.0050380016,0.000100326244,0.000730408,0.08000117,0.0002710165,0.0025415965,0.16117132,0.018194841,0.6820334],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000045319848,0.00036873762,0.107429035,0.009833725,0.00020383463,0.000574575,0.060665257,0.00030512392,0.0011853927,0.0370196,0.7822934,0.00007604825],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.042422954,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10453669,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9985335,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00552042,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012609503,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08435202},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1837958227","doi":"10.19173/irrodl.v7i1.242","title":"Plagiarism by Adult Learners Online: A case study in detection and remediation","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":88,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Science Foundation","keywords":"Certificate; Distance education; Medical education; Plagiarism detection; Enforcement; Psychology; Computer science; Pedagogy; Medicine; Political science","score_opus":0.05647622825857566,"score_gpt":0.443220276838844,"score_spread":0.38674404858026834,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1837958227","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9981061,0.00011997895,0.00059203873,0.00018452902,0.0000024142662,0.000050293325,0.000015070568,0.000019784153,0.00090984855],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99810827,0.00014211636,0.001080469,0.000076131386,0.0000064591377,0.000025573274,0.000012901993,0.000004961578,0.00054310745],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9951763,0.0026024242,0.00050055323,0.0004594476,0.0009154795,0.00034572987],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9626319,0.020826146,0.007853895,0.0026849483,0.0038909237,0.0021122168],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004598231,0.00035509383,0.0004070536,0.0016994851,0.003326577,0.0012309942,0.00076675334,0.0017323656,0.0014906909],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03169144,0.00020147754,0.00024951308,0.0014222147,0.0012515695,0.0018682542,0.0014267912,0.00094062707,0.00035318968],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00030762036,0.0034003353,0.54308385,0.00031769508,0.000051768016,0.01589978,0.28353128,0.00038238146,0.0031518147,0.00090615184,0.002223618,0.14674361],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014993038,0.0069969804,0.6168943,0.0004602401,0.0001902077,0.06842983,0.25441787,0.006892659,0.018337615,0.0020248652,0.02502469,0.00018083624],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033993411,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0075948494,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99826765,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010894513,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009928287,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02431804},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1844909686","doi":"10.47678/cjhe.v41i3.2488","title":"Academic Dishonesty in the Canadian Classroom: Behaviours of a Sample of University Students","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Higher Education","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":73,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Regina","funders":"University of Regina","keywords":"Academic dishonesty; Cheating; Psychology; Academic integrity; Dishonesty; Sample (material); Perception; Psychological intervention; Higher education; Medical education; Academic achievement; Social psychology; Pedagogy; Political science; Medicine","score_opus":0.04821132634013943,"score_gpt":0.32136032625744665,"score_spread":0.27314899991730723,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1844909686","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9992113,0.000062333565,0.000021834383,0.000060244136,0.0000024202675,0.000028559758,0.0001494499,0.0000016597762,0.00046212043],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987142,0.00025207305,0.00010524847,0.00007609047,0.000004204979,0.000021486407,0.00020077918,0.0000023622779,0.0006236411],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988581,0.00009834715,0.00007082179,0.00012722138,0.00049911183,0.00034632292],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973339,0.00017453279,0.0006849997,0.000110429,0.000932306,0.0007637687],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010387389,0.00048121533,0.00049885415,0.0024187095,0.0047497195,0.0016522218,0.0011388703,0.00067860744,0.0012431915],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0034859097,0.0005069262,0.0004372871,0.0032887817,0.0014066892,0.0005049579,0.001659842,0.0010176378,0.00029285892],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006140087,0.00017288161,0.94750655,0.00005272777,0.00001947782,0.00020097695,0.040570848,0.00003381729,0.0008343656,0.00007424711,0.00046121283,0.010011542],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003156169,0.000082699284,0.9745009,0.000018765648,0.00000671007,0.00010092659,0.024249239,0.00008741351,0.000099450604,0.000013985841,0.0008174672,0.000019226902],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9478788,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9716044,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9993214,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012080839,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013155307,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10485631},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1860732586","doi":"10.47678/cjhe.v36i2.183537","title":"Academic Misconduct within Higher Education in Canada","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Higher Education","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":188,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"John Templeton Foundation","keywords":"Misconduct; Academic integrity; Copying; Scientific misconduct; Higher education; Psychology; Medical education; Test (biology); Academic achievement; Perception; Maturity (psychological); Cheating; Criminology; Political science; Pedagogy; Law; Social psychology; Medicine","score_opus":0.019798347776751907,"score_gpt":0.29850244140384885,"score_spread":0.2787040936270969,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1860732586","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9593796,0.002924748,0.0003748745,0.012475581,0.00012611815,0.00017157417,0.00034924704,0.000043174874,0.024155017],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9939551,0.0010185837,0.00022950032,0.0007969616,0.000015717023,0.000015754362,0.00007093496,0.000008126698,0.00388932],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.974571,0.0040010917,0.0010060053,0.0014381666,0.012172973,0.006810813],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8941352,0.016752254,0.01955012,0.0029244605,0.045527436,0.021110555],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0109715955,0.00033638102,0.00074980396,0.005862003,0.032940887,0.0073981523,0.0031119226,0.0018519448,0.003125227],"category_scores_gemma":[0.043820687,0.00055243867,0.00052913866,0.010980877,0.0081100315,0.001946543,0.0057511763,0.0033545212,0.00027116263],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002800217,0.00031929504,0.61369354,0.00047484913,0.00007315427,0.0025284488,0.2175963,0.00068781315,0.0009920993,0.012712443,0.018787492,0.13185453],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002468614,0.00014647642,0.7951826,0.0004279215,0.00004173865,0.00065749994,0.15808159,0.0008490175,0.00087136787,0.0015981066,0.041928377,0.00019065158],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98814154,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99491864,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9981481,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.15129071,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.29709113,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98438245},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1896218821","doi":"10.5430/jnep.v5n8p121","title":"Social desirability bias in relation to academic cheating behaviors of nursing students","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Nursing Education and Practice","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cheating; Misconduct; Psychology; Social desirability; Academic integrity; Social desirability bias; Scale (ratio); Population; Graduate students; Social psychology; Likert scale; Medical education; Medicine; Pedagogy; Developmental psychology; Political science","score_opus":0.34294247393624866,"score_gpt":0.560766145174667,"score_spread":0.2178236712384184,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1896218821","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99891555,0.00015190804,0.000131054,0.000103665116,0.000005484402,0.000018232693,0.00002321147,0.0000025680179,0.0006483502],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996306,0.00006781618,0.000110927824,0.000030700106,0.000011067512,0.000010384409,0.000023331277,0.0000013962074,0.000113713366],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99289423,0.0026945178,0.0011383235,0.00032576427,0.0025221086,0.00042510242],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9162514,0.02668906,0.044313926,0.003096915,0.0064263092,0.0032223128],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004732585,0.00022238836,0.0003916766,0.001919167,0.00085673295,0.0009329519,0.0005671797,0.0006748803,0.001521142],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05739525,0.00019484044,0.00044024922,0.0011561646,0.00083077856,0.00078740664,0.0010794813,0.0012931278,0.00021109873],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000048468526,0.0001222596,0.99442446,0.000020377338,0.000027848213,0.000060559436,0.0011039632,0.00001931163,0.00013076223,0.0000302201,0.00004247042,0.0039692787],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000017941512,0.00016773149,0.99715984,0.000019993198,0.0000121994135,0.00033359232,0.0017847569,0.00015269416,0.0001103714,0.00007810786,0.00017100119,0.000007957465],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016781754,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025743048,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9993251,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000628379,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008105495,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.025028586},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1906592214","doi":"10.19173/irrodl.v15i1.1684","title":"How well do Canadian distance education students understand plagiarism?","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Athabasca University","funders":"","keywords":"Paraphrase; Distance education; Phrase; Psychology; Mathematics education; Higher education; Sample (material); Pedagogy; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.06550380640766372,"score_gpt":0.44950420706514643,"score_spread":0.3840004006574827,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1906592214","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9594065,0.0015818818,0.0005232429,0.002936178,0.000058854865,0.0000580662,0.00087608106,0.00006178262,0.034497317],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9918573,0.0012732297,0.00029016277,0.0003562806,0.000014184403,0.0000136609515,0.00042127902,0.000014197559,0.005759726],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99743456,0.0002642813,0.00011325912,0.00020088367,0.0016257478,0.00036119358],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9838442,0.0028588085,0.0031583826,0.0006212656,0.008119629,0.0013977144],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022763785,0.0002367384,0.00038718976,0.0021079278,0.0031231674,0.0041070674,0.0009821745,0.00086868304,0.006169118],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02318686,0.00015419994,0.00027424935,0.0028437695,0.0014252871,0.0019582962,0.0010553192,0.0009377228,0.0016565637],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021341146,0.00023276254,0.61108327,0.00032418573,0.000057218473,0.00027134886,0.081071295,0.0002687956,0.0015733078,0.0013844145,0.015993604,0.28752634],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000122111205,0.00013669411,0.920893,0.00017427493,0.00004089591,0.0002501564,0.046713687,0.00041179435,0.001241124,0.0006121241,0.029425466,0.000088591805],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.80340594,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8123812,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9991313,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01027453,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010955639,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.39550364},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1951343740","doi":"10.1002/asi.23421","title":"Costly collaborations: The impact of scientific fraud on co‐authors' careers","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":81,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal; Université de Montréal","funders":"Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Misconduct; Scientific misconduct; Productivity; Ranking (information retrieval); Psychology; Research integrity; Rigour; Political science; Public relations; Medicine; Computer science; Law; Alternative medicine; Economics; Epistemology","score_opus":0.03220766005286423,"score_gpt":0.3526338973852482,"score_spread":0.32042623733238396,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1951343740","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98737,0.0022697155,0.0012446624,0.002925345,0.000112549526,0.000062227155,0.00043974596,0.000018273635,0.005557424],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985819,0.00034052055,0.0003319115,0.00010458631,0.00009995068,0.00003066316,0.00015071132,0.000006010496,0.0003538148],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.895026,0.0538368,0.0132082,0.0054784855,0.026252855,0.0061976477],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.26365033,0.35547686,0.28179935,0.03663957,0.03537465,0.027059393],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.057209402,0.00045066967,0.00097469136,0.009433963,0.0041227546,0.0058280607,0.0018228239,0.0019599372,0.0040341634],"category_scores_gemma":[0.3839335,0.00038152988,0.0010588126,0.010681738,0.0030420842,0.0049779266,0.008129814,0.002461845,0.0010973687],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028295614,0.00015420224,0.9686631,0.000099145065,0.00019123509,0.00034170438,0.0041733375,0.00035766044,0.0001108604,0.0008043125,0.0011125752,0.023708865],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021975722,0.0002345206,0.98739094,0.0001486218,0.00007503926,0.00063433166,0.0059127538,0.0010488426,0.0002440476,0.0020376572,0.0022122664,0.000038904465],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002716437,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029354065,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9980401,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029164348,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003977654,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30255586},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"domain":"incentives","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"domain":"incentives","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W1965217323","doi":"10.1136/bmj.d8357","title":"Research misconduct in the UK","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"BMJ","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Misconduct; Scientific misconduct; Criminology; Psychology; Political science; Law; Medicine","score_opus":0.21968532168309057,"score_gpt":0.4614763998995217,"score_spread":0.24179107821643114,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1965217323","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0043783537,0.14928648,0.0014092529,0.67988735,0.029688912,0.00040087607,0.000450496,0.00028340807,0.13421485],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.17099687,0.16330142,0.003119868,0.5511605,0.02064985,0.0011552366,0.00093408336,0.0004672192,0.08821495],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.8403248,0.072292104,0.025657037,0.011094302,0.04066086,0.009970893],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.62098134,0.15388721,0.048785813,0.03389938,0.086356685,0.056089506],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.054816406,0.00079242775,0.0020867425,0.0061920714,0.009134576,0.020485885,0.004083423,0.023735413,0.048811067],"category_scores_gemma":[0.33141026,0.0011883961,0.0014186307,0.005824434,0.014810288,0.012585044,0.017011723,0.01567602,0.0138083],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000161031,0.000064205866,0.004408254,0.0026858242,0.000107361986,0.0058721555,0.007737689,0.00014797412,0.00031216702,0.053258825,0.77927685,0.14596774],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000048157384,0.00010291529,0.003829657,0.006293634,0.000033776807,0.004522387,0.0031634686,0.000094149385,0.00012106245,0.010869127,0.97080237,0.00011932101],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024999183,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.032350466,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9762646,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.019722093,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05185128,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28990036},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"domain":"methods","study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"commentary","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["research_integrity"],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"commentary","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W1965328283","doi":"10.1016/s0002-9459(24)07693-9","title":"Influence of Attitudes Toward Curriculum on Dishonest Academic Behavior","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":49,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Center for Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, Ohio State University; University of Toronto","keywords":"Academic dishonesty; Pharmacy; Misconduct; Cheating; Curriculum; Medical education; Pharmacy school; Dishonesty; Psychology; Licensure; Medicine; Family medicine; Pedagogy; Social psychology; Pharmacy practice; Political science","score_opus":0.027115283574485435,"score_gpt":0.42416856598806696,"score_spread":0.3970532824135815,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1965328283","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99786144,0.00003971876,0.000029135981,0.00021417603,0.000007425662,0.0000061932237,0.000020795618,0.0000035582466,0.0018175715],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992926,0.000046185116,0.00004928524,0.00006059483,0.00001084535,0.00000349191,0.000021918739,0.0000031768259,0.0005118302],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973047,0.0012880239,0.00013722866,0.00017818951,0.0007259209,0.00036599473],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.945114,0.029410359,0.0123269325,0.0017118166,0.0029101258,0.008526687],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003222901,0.00026046095,0.00028167185,0.0010711561,0.0007277643,0.0015779014,0.0003305272,0.0008194108,0.005305653],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028989576,0.00020775232,0.00033399826,0.00064775435,0.0008662439,0.00044927024,0.0005838038,0.0016774886,0.0006472952],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.002433082,0.0055269687,0.96649206,0.00003719249,0.00011478798,0.00015412243,0.0023480682,0.0002612419,0.003981669,0.00045513993,0.00044302022,0.017752655],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004396692,0.00093117345,0.99602735,0.0000125079105,0.000043502085,0.00007743158,0.00087015907,0.00058945076,0.00085239985,0.00016964237,0.00036958262,0.000012698789],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0044005997,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0067559653,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9991806,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00094597315,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010925849,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01774913},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1965770155","doi":"10.5539/ass.v8n10p29","title":"Anecdotes of Plagiarism: Some Pedagogical Issues and Considerations","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Asian Social Science","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematics education; Psychology; Engineering ethics; Engineering","score_opus":0.07710072324566199,"score_gpt":0.3945870642749547,"score_spread":0.31748634102929274,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1965770155","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3785606,0.09416527,0.098302566,0.21292908,0.008542122,0.0017799229,0.00094749406,0.0005960548,0.2041769],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8897907,0.042253636,0.02322708,0.015574874,0.0029254039,0.00074048556,0.00022601068,0.00021007529,0.025051586],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.96706223,0.023107246,0.002105511,0.00081303064,0.005868804,0.00104314],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8273846,0.13958067,0.008553883,0.0045678,0.018715981,0.0011970894],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021747328,0.00095677644,0.00057401723,0.004788161,0.00862051,0.008451367,0.002076793,0.004482574,0.002708718],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08966761,0.00048903906,0.0005109145,0.0042541525,0.00833821,0.009018396,0.00513607,0.0052032876,0.0008481737],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016321271,0.0000907605,0.0053559984,0.004353854,0.00004328977,0.013079095,0.7696636,0.00028669782,0.0033618591,0.08188057,0.024146233,0.09757483],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011616429,0.000099185476,0.0038741673,0.005496216,0.000041055933,0.012505785,0.62054616,0.00035528056,0.0025424948,0.0185258,0.3358982,0.00010403901],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020386619,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0051104603,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99551743,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037495634,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020653089,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11501229},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["research_integrity"],"domain":null,"study_design":"qualitative","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["research_integrity"],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"commentary","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W1967498308","doi":"10.1038/509033a","title":"Rise in retractions is a signal of integrity","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"Nature","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"SIGNAL (programming language); Chemistry; Computer science","score_opus":0.021650651809310466,"score_gpt":0.3252703508537775,"score_spread":0.303619699044467,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1967498308","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00048839947,0.00030561173,0.0000650667,0.98948425,0.0054576066,0.0000054006196,0.000014067071,0.000012979602,0.004166559],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.009398811,0.00034855236,0.0001296948,0.96100336,0.020802239,0.000021480908,0.000008825387,0.000020561522,0.008266494],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98769987,0.0031101587,0.0015571942,0.0014714289,0.004109668,0.0020517556],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93078,0.043420617,0.0052482598,0.0031257276,0.00842017,0.009005302],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012266641,0.00056289416,0.0018487102,0.0012835267,0.010881158,0.012233564,0.0033242425,0.15275338,0.008473645],"category_scores_gemma":[0.13911183,0.0010722358,0.0014209063,0.0013796024,0.016175713,0.0073233293,0.004367252,0.10754763,0.0054686884],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005674509,0.00004682593,0.0014479412,0.00004785261,0.000033883847,0.0027235397,0.0008078795,0.00006181648,0.00021321286,0.020163473,0.9670662,0.007330472],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001775235,0.00011215492,0.0046463655,0.0006169474,0.00009025972,0.0036494755,0.0026395146,0.001063809,0.0007672102,0.073299356,0.91274065,0.00019669726],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0074388254,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017550891,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98773336,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0076753222,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012061856,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06487292},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["research_integrity"],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"commentary","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"domain":"methods","study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"commentary","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W1967565418","doi":"10.1080/09639284.2011.650452","title":"Perceptions of Authorial Identity in Academic Writing among Undergraduate Accounting Students: Implications for Unintentional Plagiarism","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Accounting Education","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Identity (music); Perception; Psychology; Academic writing; Pedagogy","score_opus":0.034414311140760344,"score_gpt":0.4212675785201,"score_spread":0.38685326737933967,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1967565418","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99866545,0.00008736995,0.00007857691,0.00025039393,0.000008070544,0.0000047787034,0.0000034720647,0.0000020573873,0.00089980563],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99946946,0.000070607784,0.000058378864,0.000040305025,0.0000046546506,0.000003396379,0.000004378473,0.0000010896823,0.00034763486],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99300706,0.0027136868,0.0007234355,0.0002705009,0.0025271748,0.0007581951],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9579047,0.01254362,0.016785203,0.0015728417,0.00463356,0.006560129],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00669724,0.00027274166,0.0004520969,0.0013387678,0.0027409198,0.005855696,0.00061190285,0.0008456079,0.0030095004],"category_scores_gemma":[0.037905738,0.0002566377,0.0004076487,0.0008416674,0.0030870833,0.0020630104,0.0033560982,0.0021399762,0.00051510875],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002270724,0.00067016843,0.7161026,0.00014149018,0.000029537368,0.00057345344,0.24472357,0.000094276686,0.0020831942,0.0010842786,0.00037053623,0.033899773],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015484145,0.00078530924,0.5261732,0.00022851078,0.00003212327,0.0011026384,0.4651025,0.0004108419,0.0016494227,0.0014125546,0.0030154665,0.000071957205],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024755604,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033130413,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9991544,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014886006,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025522606,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03541881},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"qualitative","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["research_integrity"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W1968091375","doi":"10.1007/bf03216874","title":"Individual assignments and academic dishonesty — Exploring the learning Conundrum","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Australian Educational Researcher","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Laurentian University","funders":"","keywords":"Cheating; Academic dishonesty; Psychology; Perspective (graphical); Honor; Medical education; Higher education; Pedagogy; Public relations; Mathematics education; Social psychology; Computer science; Political science; Internet privacy; Medicine","score_opus":0.3588705273252603,"score_gpt":0.4449025986276969,"score_spread":0.08603207130243656,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1968091375","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6878699,0.0024536238,0.01061285,0.06949472,0.0002662637,0.00007295528,0.00005964114,0.00009315082,0.22907686],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9946009,0.00024168417,0.0004033957,0.000635044,0.000060939255,0.000017922806,0.000006084289,0.00001677355,0.004017188],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.973916,0.017968196,0.0006071584,0.0012299978,0.0037602375,0.002518401],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8026266,0.13591172,0.020861844,0.013979043,0.0120114265,0.0146093555],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.023392761,0.0002808371,0.00075497566,0.004579782,0.010172183,0.018259658,0.00364146,0.0044278083,0.011853488],"category_scores_gemma":[0.12114086,0.00041815423,0.00040504077,0.003743592,0.04129737,0.015262461,0.01618417,0.0068477783,0.00087126106],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020145047,0.00047978337,0.067169994,0.00029544547,0.000043050117,0.0004979157,0.3687511,0.00045986124,0.00032522302,0.4357799,0.00578444,0.120211884],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000053842654,0.00034682816,0.085694954,0.00083800644,0.000048832564,0.00083363196,0.42096478,0.002504445,0.0010056768,0.4445069,0.043086246,0.00011593834],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0067313113,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008628602,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9955722,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007258791,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009652232,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12371427},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1969795835","doi":"10.1145/1227310.1227324","title":"Plagiarism detection using feature-based neural networks","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":75,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Plagiarism detection; Computer science; Feature (linguistics); Relevance (law); Detector; Artificial neural network; Similarity (geometry); Artificial intelligence; Feature engineering; Code (set theory); Similarity measure; Feature extraction; Measure (data warehouse); Pattern recognition (psychology); Machine learning; Data mining; Deep learning; Programming language","score_opus":0.02383288585388381,"score_gpt":0.3070886043220694,"score_spread":0.2832557184681856,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1969795835","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4857149,0.0010796982,0.4955466,0.0006311759,0.00013686302,0.0003745229,0.0008878481,0.009769527,0.005858845],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8862064,0.00017678922,0.110640965,0.00006648996,0.00006109917,0.00012674986,0.00062394835,0.00006459498,0.0020330385],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986155,0.0003094417,0.00012860315,0.00034220467,0.0004901281,0.000114177994],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9903554,0.0043803165,0.0017333874,0.0005655944,0.0027435184,0.00022190997],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019614515,0.0007868564,0.0008402022,0.0049791643,0.0006074671,0.0012598333,0.0010901911,0.0009814056,0.0014080342],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010699854,0.00025906117,0.00047054645,0.0018841083,0.0004417742,0.0016033051,0.0007065732,0.00089584175,0.0007481082],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005481282,0.00047080027,0.02545963,0.00022317759,0.00017938844,0.00014914888,0.00019106438,0.03701305,0.025423877,0.0008718544,0.0035133844,0.90595657],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000034976474,0.00017278049,0.018034218,0.0000376995,0.0000642781,0.00014040044,0.00006238531,0.9539017,0.02390533,0.0024501327,0.0011464292,0.000049606453],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004988308,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005852296,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9990186,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010685384,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00062701176,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.010373294},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["research_integrity"],"domain":null,"study_design":"simulation_or_modeling","genre":"methods","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"bench_or_experimental","genre":"methods","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W1971952397","doi":"10.1002/ppul.21084","title":"Plagiarism rears its ugly head or the taming of the few","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"editorial","venue":"Pediatric Pulmonology","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Library science; Medicine; History; Computer science","score_opus":0.020422129436380602,"score_gpt":0.32045118170947545,"score_spread":0.30002905227309484,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1971952397","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00003582072,0.004663686,0.00006392583,0.060541514,0.9336099,0.000008124034,0.00001956467,0.000033000568,0.0010244377],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00070891134,0.003270101,0.00007751934,0.034745604,0.9558971,0.000011416973,0.0000123627415,0.00002781256,0.0052491217],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98868364,0.0025830907,0.0018413939,0.0011639987,0.0049850196,0.00074283057],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.917767,0.038738236,0.004976287,0.0026746148,0.028947102,0.0068968534],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01558999,0.0038859656,0.005290638,0.005011891,0.0054242467,0.013755013,0.0050240955,0.03279266,0.010484845],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07762196,0.0015236412,0.002845003,0.0028397362,0.006153339,0.005551488,0.0019224582,0.033671785,0.008244651],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016308955,0.0000075724006,0.000037644862,0.00016945464,0.000019377749,0.00009292514,0.00002468297,0.000009949121,0.000017138336,0.0002650882,0.9962458,0.0030939812],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006451779,0.00003654601,0.0005687144,0.00091207336,0.00010416452,0.0003736251,0.00018592832,0.00016397385,0.00010516929,0.0016660778,0.99578,0.000039221053],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029092582,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008302014,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9672073,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0046113404,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0048137805,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08244878},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["research_integrity"],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"editorial","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["research_integrity"],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"editorial","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W1972738039","doi":"10.1053/j.jvca.2011.12.003","title":"Mea Culpa: Scientific Misconduct","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"editorial","venue":"Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Centre; Capital District Health Authority; Dalhousie University","funders":"Centers for Disease Control and Prevention","keywords":"Medicine; Misconduct; Scientific misconduct; Law; Pathology; Alternative medicine","score_opus":0.018515000177676273,"score_gpt":0.31696967809185966,"score_spread":0.2984546779141834,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1972738039","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00005721432,0.0031953643,0.00017798947,0.095653,0.8976321,0.000037435428,0.00008572504,0.00014850672,0.0030126506],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00080538075,0.0021612858,0.00019661727,0.04189028,0.9416849,0.00006732196,0.000054318916,0.00008181935,0.013058086],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9793459,0.0040238025,0.0028276285,0.0017576427,0.0107468525,0.0012982584],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.88459134,0.057326674,0.008742645,0.0048156073,0.03655164,0.007972129],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019864075,0.0045338543,0.005571589,0.01080682,0.006941813,0.017276805,0.007652027,0.05544188,0.027503999],"category_scores_gemma":[0.14558545,0.0024080651,0.004119398,0.0046699587,0.0051100357,0.00570141,0.0035760386,0.031074354,0.01780585],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016834529,0.000007595243,0.000036047168,0.00010761656,0.000019435924,0.00011681868,0.00001651747,0.000012192687,0.000020165842,0.00019803761,0.99637055,0.0030783275],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000088928995,0.000025354577,0.00061231,0.0011684726,0.00015238738,0.00036345367,0.00010737571,0.000357421,0.00016963376,0.0020718202,0.9948414,0.000041494295],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032920125,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010211074,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94455814,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007819943,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00769359,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10505247},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1981277024","doi":"10.1007/s10805-014-9206-2","title":"Investigating Perceptions of Students to a Peer-Based Academic Integrity Presentation Provided by Residence Dons","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Academic Ethics","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Academic integrity; Presentation (obstetrics); Psychology; Residence; Perception; Test (biology); Medical education; Qualitative property; Qualitative research; Social psychology; Medicine; Computer science; Sociology","score_opus":0.0998699436681297,"score_gpt":0.4575987969335344,"score_spread":0.3577288532654047,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1981277024","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99206394,0.00008411213,0.00014694787,0.0023452572,0.00009780888,0.000042070205,0.000011962367,0.000009646415,0.005198293],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9961504,0.00008464027,0.00014955727,0.00068173226,0.00004480526,0.000026126878,0.000011736638,0.0000075815888,0.0028434948],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9747751,0.014018351,0.0013176892,0.0010524025,0.0056207543,0.0032158066],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8964042,0.027647208,0.022603735,0.0028624658,0.017129518,0.033352952],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016455792,0.00039805594,0.0008025369,0.0014431222,0.010881713,0.012977806,0.0016426438,0.0035683417,0.010189539],"category_scores_gemma":[0.090528965,0.0005082507,0.0007559446,0.0008849398,0.004719836,0.0034578652,0.008992518,0.006450932,0.0016089252],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009120309,0.005775287,0.31982967,0.0003135283,0.00015094124,0.0019374585,0.62583196,0.00019354862,0.0025041068,0.0043882737,0.00749723,0.030665968],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000058864058,0.0011398484,0.057109497,0.00014273026,0.000057930243,0.00046434152,0.9270824,0.00033105366,0.00065796584,0.00058839365,0.012300588,0.000066333596],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0061015654,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011159437,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99643165,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0049283323,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006995106,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08702755},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1984855456","doi":"10.1038/503454a","title":"Research ethics: 3 ways to blow the whistle","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Nature","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"World Federation of Science Journalists","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Engineering ethics; Engineering","score_opus":0.09750959602169522,"score_gpt":0.4350256209921283,"score_spread":0.3375160249704331,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1984855456","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004933884,0.017291356,0.10813186,0.72357047,0.005062473,0.0003793541,0.00013127793,0.0005783745,0.13992094],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.40569353,0.016449101,0.20179203,0.29421517,0.009729953,0.003863608,0.00022514969,0.0019879274,0.06604358],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.8573477,0.098390065,0.0058153505,0.0045341076,0.028167097,0.0057456926],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7922524,0.14648171,0.008078018,0.019117773,0.023531713,0.01053831],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.13337411,0.0027339645,0.0040220693,0.010391158,0.02113179,0.054592766,0.006573597,0.052327417,0.020191757],"category_scores_gemma":[0.153736,0.0028723683,0.0044005727,0.004615735,0.13865566,0.06619353,0.029853558,0.045387432,0.005040794],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004339191,0.00004615742,0.00034275008,0.0002173779,0.000038410304,0.00006383065,0.007194793,0.0001178435,0.0000735917,0.94629806,0.02939606,0.016167687],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006878061,0.00003054975,0.00020940293,0.0009899441,0.00002860806,0.0001367511,0.005613962,0.0003139276,0.00011732636,0.9292964,0.063117236,0.000077078395],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006816671,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011053411,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9476726,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017158074,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04056315,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.70535815},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1985759936","doi":"10.1093/jiplp/jpv019","title":"Descriptive marks and the importance of counterclaims","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Descriptive statistics; Business; Psychology; Mathematics; Statistics","score_opus":0.05782294030811143,"score_gpt":0.3172405990047298,"score_spread":0.25941765869661837,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1985759936","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16983183,0.005324701,0.048530124,0.1933225,0.0018789471,0.00023041898,0.00031335576,0.00043198536,0.5801361],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96376216,0.0008284344,0.00508576,0.01423225,0.000673498,0.00006896332,0.00003453819,0.00009238351,0.01522202],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9747849,0.005527819,0.0016430859,0.0028542804,0.012478904,0.0027110286],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.86078286,0.09897243,0.005983139,0.010031025,0.02242305,0.0018073848],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.030276665,0.00044176323,0.00081737613,0.0032993145,0.00895014,0.012531549,0.004924435,0.018046172,0.006475581],"category_scores_gemma":[0.14245464,0.00089915254,0.00059750734,0.0023150393,0.033906523,0.01360284,0.0036957227,0.01645932,0.00081237475],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000043520387,0.00001491236,0.00079126965,0.00004631105,0.000009095448,0.00037729423,0.003273183,0.00017161264,0.0004430566,0.98148465,0.0057851616,0.0075599486],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018000098,0.00008245235,0.003685205,0.00076072087,0.00013564852,0.00088834966,0.0066346065,0.0043140803,0.005962994,0.85442317,0.12274784,0.00018485499],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09404273,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.114519574,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9819538,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012637568,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019146008,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18699068},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1987159326","doi":"10.1080/15265161.2011.603813","title":"What About Author Order and Acknowledgments? Suggestions for Additional Criteria for Conceptual Research in Bioethics","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"The American Journal of Bioethics","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University; Université de Montréal","funders":"Mississippi State University","keywords":"Scholarship; Bioethics; Order (exchange); Sociology; Library science; Graduate research; Political science; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.3259697954080958,"score_gpt":0.49446600759352827,"score_spread":0.16849621218543248,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1987159326","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00044921058,0.0010643402,0.016600672,0.7916826,0.14860177,0.0029921625,0.001255774,0.0024135858,0.03493995],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.018197602,0.0028241037,0.10416167,0.53837556,0.099012166,0.018114073,0.0015091533,0.0049709654,0.21283475],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9369566,0.022956112,0.017968345,0.003223108,0.014245478,0.0046504065],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6091109,0.13897805,0.020071073,0.018271182,0.19382145,0.019747343],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0708804,0.0020988958,0.0034101268,0.005974624,0.009235224,0.01400335,0.008074715,0.034962293,0.15254955],"category_scores_gemma":[0.38472873,0.0024441436,0.0025913133,0.005607629,0.0074223843,0.012905339,0.005759293,0.02775725,0.1273293],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008187202,0.000036414363,0.0001626838,0.00028406622,0.000006435957,0.00028427137,0.00063958863,0.00003110613,0.0002644371,0.009382798,0.9785931,0.010233115],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003144434,0.000030605035,0.00071333564,0.0016819735,0.00002142117,0.0005223855,0.0023155583,0.0010154389,0.00045389836,0.025826167,0.96695316,0.00015170204],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010490353,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016412845,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9650377,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014360721,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01695276,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5103291},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1990896292","doi":"10.1136/bmj.g4532","title":"Should research fraud be a crime?","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"BMJ","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"SickKids Foundation; Hospital for Sick Children","funders":"","keywords":"Sanctions; Harm; Misconduct; Criminology; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Computer security; Psychology; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.24406535650764355,"score_gpt":0.4920499952637575,"score_spread":0.24798463875611393,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1990896292","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00012709574,0.001073042,0.00009982111,0.99253476,0.004261122,0.0000023587388,0.0000076454335,0.000008897289,0.0018852509],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0032328577,0.0012041837,0.00023722867,0.986728,0.00517348,0.000008433907,0.000011915037,0.000019067358,0.0033847876],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97046113,0.010175661,0.0026959793,0.002856763,0.010860939,0.0029495046],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.861279,0.07580933,0.010745072,0.0070106173,0.02932396,0.015832001],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.030435825,0.0006072535,0.0012786844,0.0013685067,0.007839568,0.012183327,0.0027274198,0.054720968,0.013090243],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1665682,0.0008775878,0.0015560137,0.001220897,0.01976699,0.014077855,0.003747526,0.055079743,0.0078040026],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000048064234,0.000031747804,0.0010355626,0.00011723158,0.000041633473,0.00030939945,0.0008638062,0.000024776953,0.00016385417,0.051503118,0.93122643,0.014634466],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005598333,0.000058147925,0.0018095837,0.0011076637,0.00005470656,0.0012603658,0.0026153896,0.0001687414,0.00044366592,0.060097896,0.93222636,0.00010166016],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014980443,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020087736,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.945279,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0051155617,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018567234,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16096199},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1992171206","doi":"10.1108/00907321111108169","title":"The librarian's role in combating plagiarism","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Reference Services Review","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Originality; Quarter (Canadian coin); Tracking (education); Value (mathematics); Plagiarism detection; Sociology; Class (philosophy); Psychology; Work (physics); Medical education; Library science; Pedagogy; Computer science; Engineering; Medicine; Social science; Qualitative research","score_opus":0.04872931401283874,"score_gpt":0.30351276508528446,"score_spread":0.2547834510724457,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1992171206","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.53196186,0.029679934,0.027891237,0.08447379,0.00093939336,0.00058259966,0.00028324127,0.0021741234,0.32201388],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9516534,0.0056099347,0.014035461,0.010308266,0.0003672978,0.00014968465,0.00010473808,0.00017187982,0.017599206],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.91191673,0.062767014,0.006712019,0.0022243164,0.013514243,0.0028656772],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.78472006,0.12519126,0.023753587,0.009163655,0.040673587,0.016497899],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04547182,0.000255066,0.0007982879,0.0063501825,0.008642609,0.016895426,0.001676422,0.001952887,0.009543047],"category_scores_gemma":[0.12822056,0.0004206835,0.00043539374,0.0064609977,0.0037904868,0.009454519,0.006812412,0.0015331724,0.004008029],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00032822977,0.00071231264,0.23534618,0.0024444782,0.00023536301,0.0012163842,0.090805195,0.00024036944,0.0021849703,0.01907111,0.038452197,0.60896325],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010068463,0.0011738134,0.22631715,0.0027445932,0.00030926804,0.005851133,0.18164928,0.00069358427,0.0049504265,0.009411391,0.56659317,0.00020554337],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026848337,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0038870345,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9980471,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0048998366,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014501664,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24048084},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1994625501","doi":"10.1097/nne.0b013e3182461b5c","title":"Trialing a Contextual Approach to Academic Honesty","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Nurse Educator","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Lakeridge Health; University of Ontario Institute of Technology","funders":"","keywords":"Honesty; Context (archaeology); Psychology; Orientation (vector space); Medical education; Academic integrity; Engineering ethics; Pedagogy; Social psychology; Medicine; Engineering","score_opus":0.063495537414427,"score_gpt":0.37682151275423864,"score_spread":0.31332597533981166,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1994625501","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.58187383,0.0033130303,0.082805924,0.17692621,0.0068749464,0.010765712,0.00018434014,0.00047836406,0.13677761],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9383877,0.00058178493,0.026400447,0.022096038,0.0005869667,0.006704064,0.000031530697,0.00013190671,0.005079577],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.5725371,0.35587996,0.01344422,0.010997907,0.038255103,0.008885599],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.50457215,0.36708185,0.02752687,0.049713038,0.037763916,0.013342212],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.26518935,0.0006937595,0.0012065431,0.0016337733,0.023724036,0.017452972,0.004939956,0.011792821,0.005822675],"category_scores_gemma":[0.41495955,0.0008038243,0.0016227722,0.0015013973,0.020092048,0.008647562,0.018548526,0.019400317,0.0009182517],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0050643412,0.004381767,0.018918766,0.0029170243,0.0009733258,0.0019181757,0.29255867,0.0034032464,0.007844976,0.34540045,0.032239016,0.2843803],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0041993037,0.014128712,0.02010981,0.006789527,0.00096618943,0.0008672375,0.24304369,0.0071355593,0.02352742,0.1605242,0.5178165,0.0008918518],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029890721,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008467957,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98820716,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011689538,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.027629843,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.90615237},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1994627569","doi":"10.1007/s10805-012-9153-8","title":"Examining the Impact of Dons Providing Peer Instruction for Academic Integrity: Dons’ and Students’ Perspectives","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Academic Ethics","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Academic integrity; Psychology; Academic dishonesty; Mathematics education; Sociology; Political science; Pedagogy; Higher education; Social psychology; Law","score_opus":0.19444900512084679,"score_gpt":0.47606880678081603,"score_spread":0.28161980165996925,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1994627569","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93799865,0.0004908002,0.0003039005,0.027559938,0.00022195319,0.000030496993,0.000022004655,0.000010545149,0.033361692],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971937,0.00013638393,0.000069458954,0.001283679,0.00004839721,0.000011710785,0.00000615359,0.0000053119957,0.0012452686],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9530072,0.027466398,0.0012634133,0.001504502,0.007589619,0.009168761],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.87707907,0.05717544,0.015992068,0.004180955,0.022437796,0.023134677],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.030837482,0.00032980042,0.00080793345,0.0021121528,0.01762941,0.014561195,0.0020953715,0.0052830926,0.006778151],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10041451,0.0004274126,0.00087354874,0.001983,0.014358717,0.0064871693,0.016898064,0.009091689,0.00070126564],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005004537,0.0022528772,0.17396967,0.00037090902,0.00013855088,0.0020064851,0.68070537,0.00027135224,0.0011586588,0.06827942,0.016306942,0.05403931],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000049440314,0.00055697426,0.04348002,0.0002858488,0.00007958284,0.0004908882,0.9168486,0.00019517264,0.0013270696,0.005376369,0.031255085,0.000055015495],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0052403556,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015682112,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9947169,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008860339,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019408606,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16308612},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1995440937","doi":"10.1145/1865907.1865908","title":"Cheating in Computer Science","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ubiquity","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cheating; Wonder; The Internet; Restructuring; Mathematics education; Psychology; Computer science; Social psychology; World Wide Web; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.01921283396855856,"score_gpt":0.3295873800755561,"score_spread":0.31037454610699755,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1995440937","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.41022465,0.03721952,0.007154214,0.09908068,0.0007680634,0.0000878077,0.00017277051,0.0001499737,0.44514236],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9811513,0.004438545,0.0004987253,0.004977617,0.00041401474,0.000022250199,0.00002700279,0.000036452744,0.0084340125],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9875973,0.0061701867,0.00064190815,0.001466472,0.0031021817,0.001021932],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93264836,0.03616716,0.017141046,0.0058483337,0.0048697954,0.0033252598],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0071698516,0.00026768923,0.00056830986,0.004230398,0.009525868,0.007021949,0.00065401994,0.0043354873,0.008271101],"category_scores_gemma":[0.049972992,0.0004483844,0.00040747446,0.0032424014,0.01607487,0.011823261,0.0071272603,0.0048875134,0.001143283],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003712952,0.00036596713,0.16287842,0.0007019874,0.00019871564,0.0018575802,0.102147974,0.00059939036,0.0015325176,0.39887157,0.07000531,0.26046938],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000083576684,0.0005442821,0.2656819,0.0016748976,0.000121232246,0.008504147,0.058595892,0.0013774737,0.0026077956,0.30139908,0.35915157,0.00025806433],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022507752,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024995178,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99566454,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004011657,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001225114,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03791827},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1996403924","doi":"10.1080/02602930701772788","title":"An investigation into electronic‐source plagiarism in a first‐year essay assignment","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Inyuvesi Yakwazulu-Natali","keywords":"Acknowledgement; Ignorance; The Internet; Quarter (Canadian coin); Perception; Psychology; Electronic publishing; Sociology; Pedagogy; Mathematics education; Public relations; Political science; Computer science; World Wide Web; History; Law","score_opus":0.049372582319956566,"score_gpt":0.3927665071328492,"score_spread":0.34339392481289266,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1996403924","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99548894,0.00009932536,0.0008872179,0.00018387043,0.000019702831,0.00010024873,0.000023788281,0.0000126654195,0.0031841714],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9938167,0.00019861861,0.0010600886,0.00007551326,0.000032799977,0.000063698826,0.000038725557,0.000011561828,0.0047023054],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9941005,0.002805967,0.00067060767,0.00041976545,0.0016242672,0.00037880937],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9481672,0.030105187,0.010450049,0.00216407,0.0074228905,0.0016905436],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0073806266,0.0003936298,0.0003717221,0.0039820187,0.0041306186,0.0037143202,0.0009842681,0.0010663478,0.002985952],"category_scores_gemma":[0.044726487,0.00034212266,0.0002519613,0.00197562,0.0018048966,0.0019820281,0.002630787,0.001283344,0.0006044558],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00047704304,0.0021501214,0.23100817,0.00077443215,0.000046800094,0.0071850433,0.59395707,0.00039087297,0.01636963,0.0025323075,0.0010484874,0.14405996],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000050674214,0.0033734967,0.51764536,0.0006777658,0.000060332324,0.0056518475,0.40092734,0.0018514084,0.023471868,0.0021183912,0.04403744,0.0001340354],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011143772,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024919345,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9989337,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015817047,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017698525,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.039032936},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["research_integrity"],"domain":null,"study_design":"design_other","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W1996875105","doi":"10.1080/10508422.2013.869747","title":"Cognitive Enhancement and Academic Misconduct: A Study Exploring Their Frequency and Relationship","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics & Behavior","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Université de Montréal; Montreal Clinical Research Institute","funders":"","keywords":"Misconduct; Cheating; Psychology; Cognition; Scientific misconduct; German; Academic integrity; Economic Justice; Political science; Criminology; Medical education; Law; Social psychology; Medicine; Psychiatry; History; Alternative medicine","score_opus":0.33474939909622264,"score_gpt":0.42572240834233166,"score_spread":0.09097300924610902,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1996875105","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9957865,0.0006347523,0.00013035611,0.00033308714,0.0000079083175,0.000065485125,0.000042930096,0.000003265219,0.0029956666],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99882716,0.00040560847,0.00015560482,0.00009172475,0.0000140537095,0.00005984917,0.000031988762,0.0000024314572,0.0004116342],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99032545,0.00554013,0.0008808005,0.000446465,0.0022376818,0.0005695842],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.85428536,0.08370358,0.039327543,0.0062564295,0.00929044,0.007136612],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010760568,0.00027368983,0.0005353548,0.003100158,0.001978209,0.0023326166,0.0010507071,0.0012922062,0.002945076],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08700103,0.0003703933,0.00055582286,0.0020467648,0.0020264902,0.0025829119,0.0025697788,0.002770814,0.0003794873],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00048808256,0.003777212,0.9213493,0.00022337289,0.00017319985,0.00038431693,0.034278106,0.0000648192,0.000284743,0.0009272055,0.00034984396,0.037699796],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000043285334,0.0009912937,0.9680836,0.00017794812,0.00011167359,0.0013272379,0.02546483,0.00024063203,0.00029517405,0.0010456902,0.0021777612,0.000040918505],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002250001,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003038413,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9987078,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013745845,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018746877,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05690795},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1999935843","doi":"10.1136/bmj.38968.611296.f7","title":"Role of systematic reviews in detecting plagiarism: case of Asim Kurjak","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"BMJ","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":67,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Sveučilište u Zagrebu; Ryerson University","keywords":"Sanctions; Audience measurement; Face (sociological concept); Systematic review; Psychology; Political science; Internet privacy; Computer science; Sociology; Law; Social science; MEDLINE","score_opus":0.10710144615269573,"score_gpt":0.4176863635685728,"score_spread":0.31058491741587707,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1999935843","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0031365552,0.10966389,0.003430978,0.8725751,0.00635486,0.00022234625,0.000106204665,0.000036586556,0.0044734674],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.22388984,0.17417802,0.046533074,0.5177824,0.032834556,0.0016523486,0.0001134184,0.00018791117,0.0028284825],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.52729136,0.30387378,0.07532582,0.015846735,0.07462898,0.0030333113],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.116731696,0.7225239,0.06929455,0.0207906,0.06468976,0.005969523],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.35913685,0.001160251,0.005494807,0.01954601,0.0057397247,0.010905156,0.0049874727,0.025937038,0.001617181],"category_scores_gemma":[0.7889165,0.0025813794,0.0035731054,0.015531168,0.014452883,0.01862836,0.008960818,0.020386169,0.0007545581],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013132043,0.00011043886,0.04034579,0.050081104,0.0037253809,0.025975311,0.02666474,0.0013022277,0.0010854232,0.13794816,0.4519993,0.25944892],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011247214,0.0007555488,0.018938221,0.1561728,0.005613571,0.055935424,0.010294438,0.0062553007,0.0022271737,0.1269768,0.6146745,0.0010314977],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0094798505,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013899745,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.974063,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010604255,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.028045068,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.79029834},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"systematic_review","genre":"review","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"domain":"methods","study_design":"systematic_review","genre":"review","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W2001217603","doi":"10.1080/02664760050120588","title":"Detecting excessive similarity in answers on multiple choice exams","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Statistics","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":72,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Cheating; False accusation; Bonferroni correction; Simple (philosophy); Computer science; Econometrics; Similarity (geometry); Statistics; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Psychology; Social psychology; Epistemology","score_opus":0.022900217674808723,"score_gpt":0.30883947224276775,"score_spread":0.28593925456795904,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2001217603","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96534824,0.0011491129,0.009346758,0.0011586978,0.00022298313,0.0002688667,0.0076529905,0.0008711854,0.0139810955],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9660235,0.00037244847,0.016556384,0.00020091553,0.00026944352,0.00013248346,0.0087270895,0.00017893927,0.0075387275],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9909984,0.0028694153,0.0013496327,0.0010792629,0.0033117558,0.00039169608],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9105627,0.057296555,0.012325587,0.0048768544,0.012344903,0.0025934135],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0058572115,0.00038995093,0.0010625664,0.009899152,0.0010312796,0.002063303,0.0009246392,0.0015356957,0.015086105],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09742379,0.00026279246,0.00042621192,0.0060004946,0.00043908868,0.0015308631,0.0022301865,0.0007199744,0.0034406995],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.002738097,0.00088982604,0.5677499,0.0012207021,0.00028166603,0.0010788789,0.0031101876,0.0008393311,0.012447343,0.004498202,0.041349523,0.3637963],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027692106,0.0011621126,0.89581585,0.0004439971,0.00025394603,0.0030701181,0.0036478362,0.013497433,0.021394068,0.01135849,0.048962507,0.000116697745],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012648784,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026003479,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9984643,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007387597,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00082495436,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.050468087},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2007071583","doi":"10.1109/ethics.2014.6893385","title":"Ethics of scientific peer review: Are we judging or helping the review recipients?","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Formative assessment; Summative assessment; Constructive; Reputation; Judgement; Engineering ethics; Quality (philosophy); Work (physics); Misconduct; Psychology; Public relations; Computer science; Political science; Pedagogy; Law; Epistemology; Engineering","score_opus":0.1445472738129408,"score_gpt":0.4062296718033762,"score_spread":0.2616823979904354,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2007071583","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0030355747,0.034354147,0.03536844,0.87235177,0.036245283,0.0006287212,0.000086910644,0.0004109883,0.017518194],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.26552734,0.11222413,0.16152851,0.31576392,0.11015783,0.0050141676,0.0005265015,0.0021541307,0.027103534],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.30112445,0.48625085,0.0539872,0.016312802,0.1353943,0.006930448],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.13278204,0.44876552,0.06769409,0.05818355,0.25551865,0.037056092],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.49976897,0.0013895385,0.0057811183,0.0059488267,0.010813123,0.041141648,0.0067397906,0.0225966,0.004363557],"category_scores_gemma":[0.82082516,0.0016300651,0.00131648,0.008240567,0.05722676,0.03231505,0.012301215,0.030215472,0.0070469524],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003209654,0.00023852488,0.007060361,0.005946452,0.0004120627,0.00058484985,0.035653718,0.0005481248,0.0011998806,0.16815333,0.46018994,0.31969178],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016349825,0.00013918777,0.0033114112,0.011316275,0.00016175717,0.0008114195,0.012552959,0.001497244,0.00091169996,0.23079373,0.7379727,0.00036812498],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035536098,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0032294763,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9774034,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010276974,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07843047,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.616874},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2012290589","doi":"10.1016/j.ejim.2009.11.002","title":"Data integrity, reliability and fraud in medical research","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of Internal Medicine","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; University of Toronto; Western University; Sackville Memorial Hospital; University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Reliability (semiconductor); Medicine; Data reliability; Interpretation (philosophy); Data mining; Computer science","score_opus":0.12877629105903401,"score_gpt":0.44617108633344704,"score_spread":0.31739479527441306,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2012290589","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3906901,0.05907371,0.0853876,0.3862489,0.0016165453,0.0003260722,0.00081686187,0.00018328954,0.07565693],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9866065,0.003331429,0.0052039237,0.0028178946,0.0010859839,0.000061882776,0.00005169208,0.000018255672,0.0008223503],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.7590876,0.1882765,0.015199821,0.005912129,0.028075414,0.0034485473],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.1788838,0.67562,0.08142958,0.030375974,0.02923319,0.004457463],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.15080163,0.00041210983,0.0012336957,0.008236347,0.0042974167,0.011067645,0.0018598665,0.0067175245,0.002788112],"category_scores_gemma":[0.51171035,0.00087482104,0.00095802615,0.009910506,0.028914483,0.012675573,0.0054863705,0.00661143,0.000462429],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011858543,0.0003399821,0.21300557,0.001726733,0.000706572,0.0015085846,0.018909484,0.0066309073,0.00054479134,0.5969773,0.018913677,0.13955061],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015916847,0.0002878202,0.05416514,0.0016346825,0.0003139906,0.0033472152,0.007232585,0.01876538,0.0011885471,0.8895999,0.023135912,0.00016966226],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038755692,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022726117,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9932825,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006611671,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011108417,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.79752475},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2013667054","doi":"10.5430/wje.v4n2p37","title":"Development of Examination Behaviour Inventory: An Integrity Measure for Prevention of Cheating in School Exams","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Journal of Education","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Tertiary Education Trust Fund","keywords":"Cheating; Psychology; Cronbach's alpha; Certificate; Standardization; Medical education; Sample (material); Applied psychology; Certification; Psychometrics; Social psychology; Clinical psychology; Medicine","score_opus":0.06209823845688237,"score_gpt":0.36862569790243477,"score_spread":0.3065274594455524,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2013667054","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98179203,0.00033782973,0.0043718,0.0004977643,0.000055141536,0.0026924787,0.0014217222,0.00011898072,0.008712304],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.950145,0.0009153257,0.03883352,0.00023161285,0.000053144606,0.0025564365,0.0024857735,0.000032095828,0.004747065],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971174,0.00067268324,0.00066045515,0.00012957297,0.0012087813,0.0002112049],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.989584,0.0021728065,0.004989345,0.0005683542,0.0020291596,0.00065627],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004077712,0.00037403623,0.0005588016,0.0016701373,0.00065784075,0.0009020456,0.00094384677,0.00056650705,0.0022949271],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012057187,0.00048699038,0.00087467104,0.0010117968,0.00032816821,0.0009818844,0.0011634352,0.0018486908,0.0005282145],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000234742,0.003112403,0.86573225,0.00043886533,0.0001621886,0.00017209702,0.003275294,0.00062701287,0.0033281732,0.0007586111,0.004215676,0.11794266],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000031883435,0.0006454555,0.9923051,0.00008386558,0.00004323148,0.00017346868,0.0008105134,0.001125249,0.0011614598,0.00018783468,0.0034031055,0.00002869346],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018694112,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004381962,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9994335,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000798065,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014735768,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021565318},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2019979083","doi":"10.1016/j.jslw.2012.03.003","title":"Rewriting and paraphrasing source texts in second language writing","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Second Language Writing","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":148,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Paraphrase; Copying; Discipline; Citation; Context (archaeology); Rhetorical question; Computer science; Academic writing; Second language writing; Rewriting; Literacy; Linguistics; Mathematics education; Psychology; Pedagogy; Sociology; Artificial intelligence; Second language; World Wide Web; History","score_opus":0.013839511348124249,"score_gpt":0.30289730772281365,"score_spread":0.2890577963746894,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2019979083","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5019604,0.0033703782,0.3449701,0.0057570017,0.0010423434,0.00060631783,0.000779115,0.0027909991,0.13872337],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91817826,0.0005127549,0.06210637,0.00018861669,0.00021984227,0.00010200825,0.00050009566,0.0009502128,0.017241735],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98069614,0.0134477895,0.0011909674,0.0010949917,0.0031019656,0.00046817499],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8770887,0.09351655,0.0036240683,0.013299877,0.011552181,0.0009186336],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007244939,0.00056756125,0.0006503797,0.00319582,0.0024531693,0.007848745,0.001132979,0.002091569,0.0126147345],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09414303,0.0006446025,0.0005709387,0.0026653835,0.002977049,0.0069100754,0.0034540931,0.0029837184,0.0040446282],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012180699,0.00062117656,0.010485084,0.001855161,0.00012502355,0.0038589323,0.17864679,0.0036795228,0.04063777,0.21439077,0.020647947,0.52383375],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037500562,0.0011328467,0.022453636,0.0022739677,0.00032050582,0.012389204,0.08087311,0.09101187,0.17471138,0.38434765,0.22970825,0.0004026213],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009988201,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011432241,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9979084,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001397269,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016896881,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.042200446},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2025597927","doi":"10.1007/s11218-011-9166-y","title":"What behaviours do students consider academically dishonest? Findings from a survey of Canadian undergraduate students","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Psychology of Education","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":57,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary; University of Regina","funders":"","keywords":"Academic dishonesty; Psychology; Situational ethics; Cheating; Academic integrity; Perception; Dishonesty; Sociology of Education; Sample (material); Social psychology; Academic achievement; Psychological intervention; Medical education; Mathematics education; Pedagogy","score_opus":0.11791313116999544,"score_gpt":0.4451605630114494,"score_spread":0.327247431841454,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2025597927","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99725324,0.000198504,0.000018068557,0.00057189673,0.00001102627,0.00002599345,0.00024497928,0.000002337633,0.0016738531],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981122,0.00038628106,0.000047349156,0.00030187462,0.000008662113,0.0000143365,0.00017304726,0.000003613259,0.0009527417],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965191,0.0003284706,0.00019689983,0.00021127916,0.00150896,0.0012354034],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.980485,0.0020714377,0.0054633645,0.00030548783,0.0056870743,0.005987711],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022263539,0.00032081935,0.0005838055,0.0032299538,0.004897526,0.0029814283,0.0015974271,0.0015506601,0.0022466145],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014065386,0.0005006247,0.0004596011,0.0049641645,0.0021494115,0.0010106271,0.0014648751,0.0024922783,0.0004640892],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006614548,0.0002342004,0.95946056,0.000054618216,0.00002048951,0.000112037786,0.032604896,0.000023853492,0.00021116676,0.00012199664,0.0010871488,0.0060028927],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000034518662,0.00004411521,0.9615538,0.000042190164,0.0000084928815,0.000044848875,0.03695431,0.00004582967,0.000044307435,0.00002650362,0.0012166147,0.000015423215],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.92677116,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96319646,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9984493,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0141690085,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.021800991,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14732015},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2027235867","doi":"10.1046/j.1473-6861.2003.00047.x","title":"The construction of plagiarism in a school of nursing","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Learning in Health and Social Care","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba; University of British Columbia; University of British Columbia Hospital","funders":"","keywords":"Syllabus; Academic integrity; Ignorance; Medical education; Inclusion (mineral); Psychology; Pedagogy; Medicine; Political science; Social psychology; Law","score_opus":0.022333013578881643,"score_gpt":0.34947159352625784,"score_spread":0.3271385799473762,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2027235867","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9456257,0.0016995752,0.0068576154,0.007832961,0.00019933621,0.000135346,0.000042756135,0.00014144358,0.037465297],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967636,0.00020679868,0.0010297418,0.00028435633,0.000050993753,0.000024414252,0.000013668433,0.000013908023,0.0016125338],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.96251565,0.027093781,0.0022040363,0.0013309158,0.005507577,0.0013479623],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.86372715,0.06685109,0.03760717,0.011466786,0.0150379315,0.0053098844],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.023240898,0.00035037077,0.00050184637,0.008423199,0.018291496,0.008028068,0.0016010755,0.0020160635,0.0048138467],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09112205,0.00052813167,0.00037737034,0.004251806,0.021927755,0.0057390225,0.010822945,0.0030879886,0.0006569483],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015063921,0.0001539949,0.098994434,0.00036473558,0.000044948054,0.0015926725,0.81657803,0.00024386162,0.0013763309,0.029044356,0.0033554311,0.048100546],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025712587,0.00034042777,0.12338125,0.0011616211,0.00006277703,0.0031091305,0.7362774,0.001526093,0.003124726,0.047122348,0.08371808,0.00015040008],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0045534717,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0053558913,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99798393,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010418141,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0077744904,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.122911036},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"qualitative","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"domain":"methods","study_design":"qualitative","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2029158492","doi":"10.1185/03007995.2014.952367","title":"Re: Marchington JM, Burd GP. Author attitudes to professional medical writing support. Curr Med Res Opin 2014 Jul 9:1-6","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"Current Medical Research and Opinion","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University Health Centre; Montreal General Hospital","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Medical writing; Medical education; Family medicine; Nursing","score_opus":0.15935537919502707,"score_gpt":0.5178399436591414,"score_spread":0.35848456446411436,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2029158492","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00022938628,0.002303021,0.00007417745,0.97775966,0.0136988945,0.0000075392545,0.00007261041,0.000046320096,0.00580841],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00881532,0.005546119,0.0003660468,0.9187558,0.03568673,0.000051064617,0.00009479779,0.00007424305,0.030609826],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99574727,0.0008181428,0.0007143881,0.00042321347,0.0019805324,0.00031650029],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95876294,0.017232042,0.0029145428,0.0014221792,0.016384589,0.0032837281],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036174706,0.0008611415,0.0012959624,0.0017620183,0.0061064465,0.00517379,0.0022436748,0.032782435,0.03395959],"category_scores_gemma":[0.076032355,0.0007488953,0.0009888442,0.0016158657,0.002915954,0.006381829,0.0019536214,0.0345606,0.039294884],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014260013,0.000008234532,0.00025924577,0.000026341031,0.0000034564207,0.0006308941,0.00008987261,0.00000909853,0.00004213333,0.0004201933,0.9934767,0.0050196135],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000085333995,0.000038441118,0.0019766914,0.0013277429,0.000028786455,0.008776176,0.0015223817,0.00019713458,0.0003462698,0.006267413,0.97936755,0.000066109824],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013602911,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024094349,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96721756,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004866235,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006147428,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.113606155},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2030542561","doi":"10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2006.04.017","title":"Is scientific publishing a criminal activity?","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Clinical Biochemistry","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Scientific publishing; Scientific misconduct; Competence (human resources); Scientific integrity; Political science; Criminal investigation; Process (computing); Criminology; Engineering ethics; Psychology; Computer science; Law; Medicine; Engineering; Social psychology; Alternative medicine","score_opus":0.08511432048072912,"score_gpt":0.4017760570364041,"score_spread":0.316661736555675,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2030542561","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05454505,0.007865555,0.0008959675,0.83044744,0.0030157676,0.000040518957,0.0001808364,0.00011707207,0.10289172],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8339355,0.010663332,0.0013759928,0.12018112,0.013112847,0.000068748275,0.00017540879,0.00013634663,0.020350706],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.95272386,0.019246917,0.0058477367,0.0025070244,0.01407241,0.0056019383],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.45246467,0.2918706,0.13630211,0.03567757,0.041607324,0.04207772],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.045433495,0.00029767025,0.0010774466,0.0069862576,0.011391512,0.023544146,0.0027822421,0.02115945,0.016981272],"category_scores_gemma":[0.34327328,0.0005694241,0.0007086374,0.012211468,0.031228282,0.012322692,0.004956417,0.012953907,0.0038477585],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004401159,0.0005679641,0.12228916,0.0007083543,0.00029497105,0.0026341393,0.020504804,0.00020158238,0.0003671925,0.48505208,0.22128671,0.14565289],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017252429,0.0002864666,0.07318412,0.0029680964,0.00020741965,0.007593496,0.03336695,0.000915291,0.0014339224,0.4823179,0.3973223,0.00023151166],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0045688064,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005918016,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97884053,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0049980665,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016193677,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24027812},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2035350826","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-8535.2007.00735.x","title":"Promoting academic writing/referencing skills: Outcome of an undergraduate e‐learning pilot project","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Educational Technology","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":49,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Medical education; Psychology; Asynchronous communication; Scrutiny; Educational technology; Process (computing); Resource (disambiguation); Instructional design; Transtheoretical model; Mathematics education; Outcome (game theory); Computer science; Pedagogy; Medicine; Behavior change","score_opus":0.03566215212770136,"score_gpt":0.3754525658308294,"score_spread":0.33979041370312807,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2035350826","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99784744,0.00003136406,0.00028522068,0.00007439213,0.000013007079,0.0009515434,0.000033182572,0.000016487867,0.000747337],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99593675,0.0001291106,0.0010959922,0.00010160805,0.000020269776,0.00082391576,0.00011858787,0.000008467591,0.0017653692],"study_design_codex":"nonrandomized_trial","study_design_gemma":"nonrandomized_trial","domain_scores_codex":[0.994827,0.002498042,0.00043714832,0.00026787317,0.0009867984,0.0009832071],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98736143,0.0035017834,0.0010472855,0.0011655415,0.0028251763,0.0040987087],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012935941,0.0009196821,0.00089464977,0.00091769686,0.0018470451,0.0014101679,0.0011484541,0.0015504557,0.002069103],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01909647,0.00044207243,0.0006285477,0.0005528637,0.0013059953,0.00089321577,0.002356867,0.0016574292,0.0012278687],"study_design_candidate":"nonrandomized_trial","study_design_consensus":"nonrandomized_trial","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0077937087,0.42553288,0.09117225,0.00081110635,0.00015393842,0.0032791703,0.057620566,0.0013564958,0.016827388,0.00038928038,0.0023617682,0.39270148],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0043252097,0.36565688,0.54877317,0.00032107285,0.00023330897,0.0022157577,0.038115088,0.0032681976,0.027975464,0.0008508668,0.007979262,0.00028563154],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023973465,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019755568,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012935941,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010371824,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002670861,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0684126},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2045836836","doi":"10.5539/ies.v6n11p77","title":"Unethical Behavior of the Students of the Czech University of Life Sciences","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Education Studies","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cheating; Czech; Psychology; Social psychology; Pedagogy","score_opus":0.07610517116838512,"score_gpt":0.4245362746389886,"score_spread":0.34843110347060346,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2045836836","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99826556,0.00016501943,0.00005512577,0.00024074731,0.000006435725,0.000013253572,0.00001217084,0.000002268881,0.0012394472],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99872357,0.00013987612,0.000043951262,0.00006577423,0.0000035544872,0.000005689661,0.00000779697,0.0000014674766,0.0010083113],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99871767,0.0003997934,0.00008846273,0.00009072749,0.00043173222,0.0002716484],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962237,0.00048119904,0.0016327177,0.00026130234,0.00069714885,0.0007039417],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001244282,0.0001619502,0.00032545478,0.0009124646,0.0020326588,0.0018566127,0.0002524533,0.0006759891,0.0021931117],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0067955162,0.00015770672,0.0002471874,0.0004360471,0.001153648,0.000442158,0.0010150253,0.0011873692,0.00045863367],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00034526095,0.00079849566,0.8321057,0.00026883784,0.000055888475,0.0014414865,0.10058984,0.00019380217,0.010714896,0.0018761867,0.0018348191,0.049774807],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012250059,0.0009234413,0.90246344,0.00015808588,0.000026894504,0.0021428678,0.07791069,0.00031016453,0.0023525585,0.0005553564,0.013066201,0.000078170684],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0039095054,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00466568,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.999324,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010326608,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016582167,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.007773459},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2050909553","doi":"10.3138/ptc.2011-13","title":"Academic Dishonesty among Physical Therapy Students: A Descriptive Study","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Physiotherapy Canada","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Seriousness; Cheating; Academic dishonesty; Medicine; Psychology; Medical education; Social psychology","score_opus":0.024721345033028207,"score_gpt":0.3511114414810504,"score_spread":0.3263900964480222,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2050909553","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99959785,0.000051280087,0.00003059867,0.00002502798,0.0000012373991,0.000023203458,0.0000558555,0.0000011229135,0.00021380116],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99939585,0.00013966559,0.0000676987,0.0000517505,0.000004482125,0.000040532403,0.00007265463,0.0000017006307,0.00022563995],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99890256,0.0002326133,0.00019562912,0.000100337056,0.00033942054,0.0002294654],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99321824,0.0017861003,0.0028252155,0.00024223342,0.0008834341,0.0010449191],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014098946,0.00019827341,0.00062675425,0.0021647287,0.0013587504,0.0013596811,0.0004550094,0.0004793635,0.0017341998],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0058546215,0.0004095126,0.0003394414,0.0018105436,0.00096017355,0.0009643969,0.00097508985,0.00086160563,0.00031948675],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000059347483,0.0005282345,0.9741853,0.000071335264,0.000011879769,0.00040324166,0.019863168,0.000013033196,0.0003567066,0.000035083944,0.000112266476,0.004360406],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000062239988,0.00068287406,0.94110227,0.00006702919,0.000015582917,0.0011279029,0.055845838,0.00010641733,0.00019759567,0.000034354143,0.0007940799,0.00001993042],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010813363,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01602935,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99952066,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011961255,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016353646,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021500826},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2052087310","doi":"10.3138/jvme.32.4.468","title":"Effective Bibliographic Searching for Animal Alternatives in Veterinary Medical Education: The UC Davis Web Site","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Veterinary Medical Education","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"U.S. Department of Agriculture","keywords":"Web site; Veterinary medicine; Medical education; World Wide Web; Medicine; Library science; Computer science; The Internet","score_opus":0.05258774217968233,"score_gpt":0.4420326064947771,"score_spread":0.3894448643150948,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2052087310","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.056234173,0.03532307,0.02142,0.04154815,0.0014916216,0.0031045636,0.05226461,0.045177415,0.7434363],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.23422985,0.07184361,0.37748498,0.009736912,0.004088863,0.0031155145,0.08074632,0.008106354,0.21064763],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9954978,0.0015390583,0.0009923275,0.00019494632,0.0016274549,0.00014835205],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9487579,0.034313556,0.0049185758,0.003101752,0.0058686533,0.0030396096],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0069148974,0.00055884337,0.0008771728,0.028303593,0.0018394837,0.004967538,0.001307908,0.0012118293,0.12145161],"category_scores_gemma":[0.042999297,0.0005396473,0.00025917531,0.027357806,0.00077209953,0.0054196077,0.0032353972,0.0006405288,0.037980642],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008578622,0.00016540285,0.0042302483,0.002184704,0.000018562181,0.00022507264,0.0015073507,0.00009878728,0.0008464466,0.001745803,0.37924698,0.6096449],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012731984,0.00012257701,0.014724134,0.0022760066,0.00006314449,0.00062767055,0.002496136,0.00063757255,0.0015156558,0.002444286,0.97488356,0.000081847786],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006234998,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018602826,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12145161,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018597497,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006329791,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40629613},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2052816062","doi":"10.5539/ies.v7n3p126","title":"Ethical Decision Making in Academic Dishonesty with Application of Modified Theory of Planned Behavior: A Review","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"International Education Studies","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Academic dishonesty; Dishonesty; Ideology; Theory of planned behavior; Psychology; Social psychology; Conceptual framework; Duty; Engineering ethics; Sociology; Cheating; Political science; Social science; Law; Control (management); Computer science","score_opus":0.14519915464347152,"score_gpt":0.5250989362602017,"score_spread":0.3798997816167301,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2052816062","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00018011536,0.99826103,0.00043258967,0.00045885632,0.000079449055,0.000011980861,0.000006631165,0.000003284904,0.0005660405],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.004139236,0.99468815,0.000725288,0.00017645286,0.00012855214,0.000029196428,0.000012931715,0.0000024382932,0.0000977493],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99714583,0.0014269626,0.0004545787,0.00025154834,0.0006590947,0.00006193822],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9786927,0.018455165,0.0013333397,0.00027537462,0.0010750501,0.00016841214],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0046473676,0.00095637096,0.0019561558,0.0058552986,0.00050751923,0.002263804,0.0013340261,0.0020110463,0.0019204727],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014690687,0.00055769505,0.001369304,0.0067350524,0.0023233902,0.0030091286,0.0010591979,0.0022800376,0.0003963424],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000048059566,0.00010325486,0.0015590052,0.06557436,0.0003206595,0.00026360262,0.00086225156,0.0008830664,0.00014066718,0.019508047,0.006564017,0.904173],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005917267,0.00037835006,0.013746069,0.19276343,0.0017810789,0.00440188,0.002425146,0.0015071644,0.00070724403,0.05235334,0.7296601,0.00021696337],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005112293,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006895699,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99798894,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022990338,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0062707993,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024577975},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2054089762","doi":"10.3928/01484834-20090916-06","title":"Webcam as a New Invigilation Method: Students' Comfort and Potential for Cheating","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Nursing Education","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University; Bridgepoint Active Healthcare","funders":"","keywords":"Cheating; Psychology; Medical education; Sample (material); Nursing; Medicine; Social psychology","score_opus":0.0374761623126165,"score_gpt":0.4684915745672485,"score_spread":0.43101541225463197,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2054089762","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9980159,0.0001697588,0.00047816065,0.0001578582,0.000008726836,0.000050025934,0.00002456568,0.000009569668,0.0010853694],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983638,0.00017719377,0.0006883386,0.00016909625,0.000012827404,0.00005481088,0.000020553414,0.000004106513,0.0005092239],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9935314,0.0033350724,0.00066672545,0.00023700841,0.0017669069,0.00046300376],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.977023,0.011381208,0.007259316,0.001145047,0.002003894,0.0011875589],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005027972,0.0002258718,0.0005243209,0.0007216807,0.0006601847,0.0014270241,0.00044234388,0.0006540022,0.0028588588],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0288446,0.00024067593,0.0005301385,0.00050217204,0.00076707196,0.0011998952,0.0011978592,0.0009836728,0.00045987373],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00056234695,0.0017209145,0.8145746,0.0006689062,0.00008843471,0.00096577185,0.057732712,0.0002364666,0.0050021326,0.0002812101,0.001077732,0.11708875],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000037450674,0.005145588,0.88049954,0.00038987302,0.00010343441,0.0028452836,0.096562855,0.0015745438,0.003966603,0.00024693648,0.008508742,0.00011914359],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007735124,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010436057,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005027972,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00056412787,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007705806,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2054143017","doi":"10.5539/jel.v1n2p21","title":"A Perception of Examination Malpractice and Pupil’s Academic Performance in Primary Science in Cross River State, Nigeria","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Education and Learning","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Malpractice; Test (biology); Stratified sampling; Psychology; Perception; Population; Medical education; Medicine; Mathematics education; Law; Political science; Environmental health; Pathology","score_opus":0.020642487053109258,"score_gpt":0.3568592034869575,"score_spread":0.3362167164338482,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2054143017","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99967134,0.00004583861,0.00001088401,0.000040656327,0.0000013603723,0.0000020835867,0.0000075027406,2.1086673e-7,0.00022027284],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99959177,0.00009452271,0.000023305422,0.000014503518,0.000001731252,0.0000021740896,0.000011241898,1.8800567e-7,0.00026043633],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99943227,0.00011535196,0.00008575672,0.000066379995,0.00017883329,0.00012140414],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977767,0.00041941946,0.0011919368,0.00005847858,0.00024803638,0.00030549985],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00083036587,0.0001502897,0.00018745447,0.0005771283,0.00083712034,0.00087280653,0.00021299314,0.00039463415,0.0022210546],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002199095,0.00022558018,0.00019775495,0.00037046886,0.0004953638,0.0005179928,0.00068819575,0.00052155944,0.00024968086],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029309942,0.00015106205,0.9876913,0.00003710672,0.0000068313616,0.00022069126,0.008049884,0.000016332822,0.00051791454,0.00006098129,0.00007241003,0.0031461508],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000015023884,0.000173729,0.9832781,0.000029593773,0.0000056441772,0.00019773572,0.015800536,0.00004672666,0.00012764511,0.000023125705,0.00031166722,0.0000039229853],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008069904,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014683944,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99960536,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00045093326,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006615168,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.016045868},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2054609865","doi":"10.1016/j.asw.2009.01.001","title":"Drawing a line in the sand: Identifying the borderzone between self and other in EL1 and EL2 citation practices","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Assessing Writing","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Reading (process); Computer science; Confusion; Mathematics education; Bounding overwatch; Psychology; Linguistics; Artificial intelligence; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.08522387649035286,"score_gpt":0.4273070635142424,"score_spread":0.34208318702388957,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2054609865","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9443537,0.00026104297,0.006662981,0.0017090618,0.00005312784,0.0000811881,0.00006333599,0.00010161024,0.04671393],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9943393,0.000063614214,0.0028937787,0.00009507786,0.0000139671265,0.000039311853,0.000041152645,0.000043339896,0.0024704766],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9807334,0.010527412,0.0017740376,0.0012729736,0.004818259,0.00087391294],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.86508256,0.08617123,0.019827146,0.011405086,0.014259712,0.0032541915],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015589141,0.00029258485,0.0004949664,0.008849991,0.0082864165,0.0119850375,0.001452923,0.002053822,0.004157904],"category_scores_gemma":[0.12573816,0.00035988257,0.000214685,0.007261963,0.007414726,0.009986153,0.008251899,0.0024612409,0.0007161368],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00032886257,0.00013824725,0.09193575,0.0001984333,0.000024479496,0.0003344662,0.7693424,0.00016884395,0.0027620303,0.038052905,0.0018251807,0.09488839],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000041609354,0.0001831774,0.10354134,0.0005233284,0.000047129117,0.000602899,0.81035805,0.0025862337,0.005666124,0.03732295,0.039022848,0.00010431014],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0056547206,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007848549,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9979462,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030870112,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025525389,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08244425},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2062364491","doi":"10.4309/jgi.2008.22.13","title":"Publishing Addiction Science","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Gambling Issues","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Addiction; Humanities; Publishing; Scientific publishing; Psychology; Political science; Art; Neuroscience; Law","score_opus":0.16191956344063468,"score_gpt":0.3955392268570365,"score_spread":0.23361966341640183,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2062364491","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"reporting","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"reporting","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002215622,0.020342935,0.0021741798,0.034651317,0.013126319,0.00008968153,0.0015946357,0.0008015151,0.9250038],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.004990396,0.0060529634,0.0004218955,0.0045735696,0.0026312654,0.000040433693,0.00057661795,0.00010835395,0.9806045],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99923587,0.000096733485,0.00005595281,0.00012900388,0.00040572145,0.00007674554],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965803,0.0005942053,0.00025654567,0.00062662445,0.0011558806,0.00078649854],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001238831,0.00070534815,0.00088256097,0.0028239016,0.0014739921,0.0043048025,0.00081294973,0.0030138744,0.40645623],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004367121,0.0005280615,0.0004881288,0.00316015,0.0016161829,0.002312625,0.0016376371,0.0038742537,0.2926332],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031660067,0.000103387996,0.0009175205,0.00024727758,0.000013667162,0.00008651754,0.00011003191,0.00005247865,0.00077145314,0.017271155,0.6870248,0.29337004],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005542765,0.000013542083,0.0008070008,0.00010337354,0.000005305958,0.00010167678,0.00004965018,0.00006826126,0.00011157387,0.003657053,0.9950729,0.000004019512],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002206028,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0056294217,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9987612,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011289503,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002728455,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8466182},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2067814851","doi":"10.1097/aco.0b013e328344529d","title":"Publication fraud: implications to the individual and to the specialty","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Current Opinion in Anaesthesiology","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ottawa Hospital; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Scientific misconduct; Misconduct; Specialty; Medicine; Scientific integrity; Subject (documents); Scientific literature; Engineering ethics; Scientific progress; Process (computing); Alternative medicine; Family medicine; Law; Political science; Computer science; Pathology; Engineering; Epistemology; Library science","score_opus":0.2536129295308809,"score_gpt":0.4404433270236083,"score_spread":0.1868303974927274,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2067814851","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00016267391,0.99003136,0.00016626486,0.0077211806,0.0012989059,0.000013431418,0.00001707412,0.000004959961,0.00058408605],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0027340674,0.9921564,0.00032354324,0.0024825085,0.0020129234,0.000024837162,0.000015518157,0.000003455618,0.0002467305],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97523767,0.011117824,0.004266397,0.0010824874,0.007788879,0.000506687],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.79594064,0.14304648,0.030616196,0.0022788066,0.026602838,0.0015150382],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021201339,0.0009020696,0.002779636,0.005498669,0.0011784845,0.004436298,0.0017380624,0.005098911,0.005076175],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1136875,0.0005485963,0.0017161964,0.007761282,0.002366992,0.004446011,0.001944805,0.0028030693,0.0015335236],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012445964,0.000035051424,0.002026439,0.095835716,0.0008238292,0.0007811761,0.00063127413,0.00027202378,0.0003270059,0.007015883,0.09613292,0.7959943],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007225973,0.000196702,0.0092602605,0.24613489,0.0027596955,0.008308091,0.0022233583,0.00039347436,0.0006567416,0.015498039,0.71437377,0.00012272455],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002136515,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004413569,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99490106,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029219892,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011515312,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11212474},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2070194843","doi":"10.1145/611892.611952","title":"Effectiveness of online assessment","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":60,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Competence (human resources); Online assessment; Online course; Online learning; Multimedia; Mathematics education; Medical education; Psychology","score_opus":0.020707926093839927,"score_gpt":0.36630660726827696,"score_spread":0.34559868117443704,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2070194843","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8858398,0.0038959722,0.020017067,0.0023203113,0.0007275563,0.0011449715,0.00087104994,0.0025268577,0.082656376],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97870296,0.0006344701,0.008161055,0.0004470501,0.00027551857,0.00035919956,0.0004670419,0.00022528364,0.010727304],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9429305,0.033773113,0.0037885406,0.002850166,0.015236488,0.00142111],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.64004403,0.2714754,0.023778828,0.025142659,0.031018727,0.008540343],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.029218666,0.00095716445,0.0011435596,0.0030941719,0.0011126958,0.0044134306,0.001492084,0.0012824716,0.011138802],"category_scores_gemma":[0.22081979,0.00025393188,0.0009713808,0.0014469327,0.0006993572,0.0048451936,0.0036578875,0.001535687,0.0035087997],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0035559959,0.0054423423,0.06464343,0.00062272814,0.00026518773,0.00011742186,0.0018863053,0.0011194822,0.0021285673,0.0008293885,0.004622961,0.9147661],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0021025657,0.038905993,0.7241691,0.0024776403,0.002049385,0.0025611646,0.009997554,0.0313131,0.05960798,0.012259677,0.1139063,0.00064967567],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00085380685,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00095651165,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029218666,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009920945,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013710897,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15452486},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2071606217","doi":"10.5455/aim.2013.21.148-155","title":"The Importance of Proper Citation of References in Biomedical Articles","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Acta Informatica Medica","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":79,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Listing (finance); Style (visual arts); Medical journal; Computer science; Library science; Order (exchange); Writing style; Information retrieval; History; Linguistics","score_opus":0.02506240120262836,"score_gpt":0.2902448487225701,"score_spread":0.26518244751994174,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2071606217","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"reporting","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"reporting","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021764765,0.28156978,0.12026058,0.2119847,0.20215978,0.0030355712,0.0041202307,0.004042903,0.15106161],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.28733328,0.19091618,0.33025715,0.036022183,0.112233356,0.0027734926,0.0057553025,0.0037032007,0.031005874],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.73799247,0.13513608,0.06330433,0.009069496,0.051922057,0.0025757172],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.34172794,0.35365126,0.06403782,0.044360865,0.18798845,0.008233605],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.1326208,0.0012879438,0.0037002992,0.040997848,0.006969532,0.035745826,0.0043224506,0.0075948024,0.008178359],"category_scores_gemma":[0.5741105,0.0017028004,0.0010710771,0.058146056,0.010354393,0.034732852,0.011231093,0.0073133563,0.0124053275],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004140859,0.00013767977,0.007341175,0.011973876,0.00018894915,0.0012955372,0.019039162,0.0004970325,0.0019533813,0.10388849,0.21111055,0.6421601],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008072164,0.00017281636,0.009456232,0.014830334,0.00021771557,0.0027309174,0.0069693243,0.0007216439,0.0017131346,0.08068779,0.88213307,0.00028634144],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034747636,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0039913794,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9924052,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006309627,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01792494,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7013742},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2076457796","doi":"10.1016/j.acalib.2009.08.001","title":"Chinese Graduate Students and the Canadian Academic Library: A User Study at the University of Windsor","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Academic Librarianship","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":69,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Windsor; Academic library; Graduate students; Perception; Information literacy; Library science; Medical education; Psychology; Post graduate; Sociology; Pedagogy; Computer science; Medicine","score_opus":0.04089685402032089,"score_gpt":0.3041141778425129,"score_spread":0.263217323822192,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2076457796","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9891964,0.00035046262,0.00004200305,0.0013044502,0.0000130458575,0.00006247261,0.00047532932,0.000018933322,0.008536904],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.986406,0.00083309197,0.00019462616,0.0007216166,0.000015430027,0.000042031974,0.00043149115,0.000037254747,0.011318402],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966216,0.0008392886,0.000159733,0.00023739487,0.0012866206,0.0008553019],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97898257,0.007082425,0.001456295,0.0005938752,0.007231163,0.0046535665],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0043203924,0.00037744196,0.00084982003,0.0044113863,0.019024877,0.0059886496,0.001432785,0.0014552203,0.009312418],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016838731,0.0005344246,0.000521301,0.012834601,0.003546072,0.0031429583,0.003964399,0.0013887355,0.0011628484],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00038838052,0.00040283613,0.21112216,0.00020467053,0.000043231037,0.0012729395,0.75364864,0.000054098866,0.0005189444,0.00094244425,0.008270131,0.023131656],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026499874,0.00013260466,0.2105563,0.000070611015,0.000046446938,0.00031382957,0.7652521,0.00013586029,0.00030705245,0.000066226974,0.023014084,0.00007831581],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9383299,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9748457,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99401134,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.027894296,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0391673,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20238823},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2083730353","doi":"10.1111/voxs.12076","title":"How to get a paper published","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"ISBT Science Series","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Blood Services; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Publication; Context (archaeology); Storytelling; Work (physics); Computer science; Engineering ethics; Scientific communication; Data science; Management science; Library science; Political science; Engineering; History; Law","score_opus":0.012958297497626146,"score_gpt":0.27337053854334636,"score_spread":0.2604122410457202,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2083730353","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002490377,0.021032607,0.04268734,0.29278076,0.48848355,0.0082782945,0.0032292975,0.009321901,0.13169588],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.03230579,0.06237185,0.1906998,0.15904227,0.1567677,0.01662006,0.008650907,0.017829528,0.3557121],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.8911094,0.027057955,0.01715035,0.0064603565,0.054870773,0.0033511638],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6575723,0.06281386,0.02244588,0.036780875,0.18313508,0.037251998],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.07249432,0.0020452559,0.0028683436,0.0063095195,0.005078866,0.04417995,0.003256544,0.013343379,0.16264305],"category_scores_gemma":[0.43042475,0.0017286818,0.005413959,0.004001171,0.004524721,0.025852405,0.009017139,0.016084624,0.25238127],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012523597,0.00011012601,0.0003390891,0.003644722,0.000110727764,0.00041178236,0.001079897,0.00019981715,0.0009617764,0.009409338,0.7523578,0.23124962],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011037318,0.00016359179,0.0004194348,0.0032308984,0.000057088,0.00037455637,0.0010667401,0.00016641473,0.0011722805,0.013365145,0.9797734,0.00010007491],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015968555,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017972018,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95582,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0056793224,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0351338,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.54409516},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2087963666","doi":"10.1007/s11948-011-9260-8","title":"A Tale of Two Perspectives: Regulation Versus Self-Regulation. A Financial Reporting Approach (from Sarbanes–Oxley) for Research Ethics","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science and Engineering Ethics","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Accounting; Audit; Business; Accounting management; Misconduct; Accounting research; Accounting standard; Financial accounting; Scientific misconduct; Public relations; Accounting information system; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.2612916037780104,"score_gpt":0.4272625517293991,"score_spread":0.16597094795138867,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2087963666","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005511034,0.046267133,0.074419186,0.8069276,0.0058937743,0.000070868155,0.00007747818,0.000079283156,0.060753625],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.56188166,0.05000969,0.083420575,0.25880986,0.020257877,0.0010000047,0.00014128031,0.00040274314,0.024076283],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9549207,0.035347283,0.0012887893,0.0018850777,0.0054142848,0.0011438471],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.925721,0.05851704,0.0031335359,0.0038132127,0.0062386123,0.0025766916],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.049300924,0.0009485887,0.0014405005,0.00571785,0.004836508,0.0158186,0.0031255109,0.011111425,0.005439982],"category_scores_gemma":[0.059115387,0.00060524704,0.0012063134,0.0042946483,0.069223434,0.031090895,0.008357692,0.020162635,0.00086715765],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020850575,0.000016442475,0.00018615615,0.00011440673,0.000013213502,0.000052435294,0.0045934594,0.000069783324,0.000076413264,0.97120476,0.013474328,0.01017786],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026399784,0.00003975596,0.00049915834,0.00059683464,0.000010561672,0.00016411152,0.004778625,0.00047712223,0.00018466623,0.910083,0.08309136,0.000048481124],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002390821,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022744301,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98888856,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006925679,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004399779,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26073134},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"domain":"methods","study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"commentary","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2089994419","doi":"10.1007/s11948-014-9600-6","title":"Scientists Admitting to Plagiarism: A Meta-analysis of Surveys","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Science and Engineering Ethics","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":132,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Meta-analysis; Psychology; Survey research; Recall; Philosophy of science; Publication bias; Peer review; Medical education; Medicine; Political science; Applied psychology; Law; Pathology","score_opus":0.22889669792562578,"score_gpt":0.44370391064431075,"score_spread":0.21480721271868497,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2089994419","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03464889,0.95966154,0.002207053,0.0009047021,0.00029573072,0.00064899726,0.0011085275,0.000026911479,0.00049764145],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.49031347,0.49532968,0.005950421,0.003674825,0.00039965523,0.0021742675,0.0017142384,0.000058565536,0.00038493233],"study_design_codex":"meta_analysis","study_design_gemma":"meta_analysis","domain_scores_codex":[0.8650335,0.08236447,0.032164328,0.008269098,0.010993759,0.0011748213],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.62402236,0.30792668,0.038947795,0.011250026,0.016467866,0.0013853037],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.107089475,0.0019694103,0.009765277,0.008283239,0.0009010869,0.0036141446,0.0026242686,0.0033000046,0.0019592703],"category_scores_gemma":[0.3060481,0.001487448,0.018737907,0.011758007,0.0022254866,0.003950447,0.003097081,0.0026299811,0.00022424996],"study_design_candidate":"meta_analysis","study_design_consensus":"meta_analysis","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0029902537,0.00011556443,0.05505887,0.36550653,0.5075033,0.00012520295,0.001820293,0.0002484111,0.00019311722,0.00047283008,0.0023672457,0.06359848],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018713489,0.00086800114,0.063740574,0.09531142,0.82642645,0.0003895979,0.001666912,0.000207284,0.0003630077,0.001338785,0.007677369,0.0001391842],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005529081,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014377469,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9967,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029825142,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007116292,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.56635004},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"domain":"methods","study_design":"meta_analysis","genre":"review","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["research_integrity"],"domain":null,"study_design":"meta_analysis","genre":"review","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2093519592","doi":"10.1007/s10805-011-9141-4","title":"Encouraging Active Classroom Discussion of Academic Integrity and Misconduct in Higher Education Business Contexts","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Academic Ethics","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Cheating; Misconduct; Academic integrity; Psychology; Scientific misconduct; Perception; Presentation (obstetrics); Psychological intervention; Higher education; Medical education; Social psychology; Medicine; Political science","score_opus":0.16043992791811768,"score_gpt":0.4030493709071121,"score_spread":0.24260944298899445,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2093519592","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9231462,0.00046293478,0.008910694,0.023326041,0.0007411743,0.00062361103,0.000051770072,0.0005140285,0.04222353],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9807154,0.00021313442,0.008401151,0.0028210918,0.0002797906,0.00070436095,0.00005604929,0.00008587298,0.006723113],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.95009184,0.038991183,0.0013469359,0.0024809062,0.0037321837,0.0033570551],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7336463,0.18726069,0.022612898,0.0107366545,0.01093652,0.03480699],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.027046809,0.0010595598,0.0011616334,0.0019455724,0.013833836,0.010090863,0.0032971497,0.008929839,0.012245542],"category_scores_gemma":[0.13240138,0.0011597235,0.0007187969,0.0006314345,0.003911231,0.0073831524,0.018353334,0.01193909,0.0035951158],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0015077704,0.024866384,0.06255748,0.0010252579,0.00013604153,0.0022209676,0.6424543,0.00080856355,0.015220177,0.013867185,0.04201564,0.19332033],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009823523,0.0058891494,0.06254536,0.0023394767,0.0002694379,0.0022392548,0.6478656,0.0056674816,0.015966216,0.057509016,0.19830205,0.00042460268],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007487993,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003112557,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99107015,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030547758,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0060832654,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14303893},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2098030430","doi":"10.1016/j.maturitas.2012.03.011","title":"Cooperation between research institutions and journals on research integrity cases: Guidance from the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE)","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Maturitas","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Statens Serum Institut; University of California, San Diego; Cross River University of Technology; University of Minnesota; Karolinska Institutet; University of Aberdeen; Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro; University of Connecticut; Monash University; Cardiff University; University of New South Wales; York University; Sveučilište u Zagrebu; Christian Medical College, Vellore; University of Oxford; Nanyang Technological University","keywords":"Scientific misconduct; Misconduct; Publication; Safeguarding; Officer; Suspect; Medicine; Research ethics; Research integrity; Publishing; Public relations; Political science; Law; Alternative medicine; Nursing; Psychiatry","score_opus":0.6041774147874082,"score_gpt":0.5535568546090945,"score_spread":0.05062056017831362,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2098030430","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004063521,0.004627351,0.04933927,0.8315729,0.014969746,0.0152797615,0.0005841579,0.0014821235,0.078081146],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.049819615,0.008165282,0.345906,0.47407666,0.010905625,0.040441725,0.0010723186,0.0022648342,0.06734798],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.44020438,0.35826257,0.092672616,0.010285062,0.08101322,0.017562155],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.18726294,0.44387287,0.042468183,0.07657985,0.20943016,0.04038595],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.49071854,0.0017857756,0.0041091,0.0061352686,0.013187752,0.03740225,0.008575653,0.061796363,0.0102402475],"category_scores_gemma":[0.63900155,0.0055248123,0.0038683084,0.007779208,0.019278925,0.025821086,0.018061863,0.040248957,0.019472329],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001691489,0.00033077286,0.0020535735,0.0010482857,0.00005501279,0.0010676098,0.011935052,0.00040886266,0.0013423746,0.035509992,0.8938491,0.05223034],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022787284,0.0001273685,0.0017923381,0.0039407285,0.000056362853,0.0019225617,0.005795972,0.0010015196,0.0016354098,0.030142857,0.9530079,0.00034903118],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0050822576,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010726744,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93820363,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014185016,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.17985025,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6280347},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2099483602","doi":"10.47678/cjhe.v43i1.2216","title":"Pedagogical or punitive?: The academic integrity websites of Ontario universities","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Higher Education","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"University of Toronto","keywords":"Punitive damages; Mandate; Academic integrity; Snapshot (computer storage); Scholarship; Sociology; Public relations; Higher education; Political science; Computer science; Library science; Law","score_opus":0.08712671142651432,"score_gpt":0.35746169074483763,"score_spread":0.2703349793183233,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2099483602","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9510307,0.00040740834,0.00022916566,0.004962069,0.000027889033,0.00004775136,0.0004596697,0.000054793174,0.042780522],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9892792,0.00034376892,0.00016210927,0.0004105728,0.000011121325,0.000019565068,0.00016234675,0.000028711134,0.009582589],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964702,0.00066763884,0.00013564313,0.00024178467,0.0016129503,0.0008717868],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97639674,0.0060450244,0.0056681186,0.0013850903,0.0055459435,0.0049591777],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022294035,0.0001607057,0.00030289456,0.00284404,0.017377602,0.009698382,0.0009094606,0.0013733977,0.006964274],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018000107,0.00035754812,0.0001722638,0.0060594315,0.0074935495,0.005234701,0.004118749,0.0010347131,0.0008717793],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027093032,0.00018510075,0.2731673,0.00038857904,0.000028932962,0.0020386332,0.6003111,0.0002563107,0.0022515098,0.01961456,0.028998494,0.07248863],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010158785,0.000064015716,0.26793158,0.00018514448,0.000020574807,0.00042967117,0.58246756,0.00043416466,0.0010177958,0.00091474946,0.1464312,0.000093398674],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.844186,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9145636,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9986266,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.032308154,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03737373,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3134632},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2102671823","doi":"10.21913/ijei.v3i1.128","title":"An exploration of the role of Canadian academic libraries in promoting academic integrity","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal for Educational Integrity","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Academic integrity; Academic dishonesty; Academic library; Information literacy; Library science; Political science; Higher education; Exploratory research; Public relations; Medical education; Sociology; Medicine; Computer science; Law; Social science","score_opus":0.07851609246483005,"score_gpt":0.40589672288343787,"score_spread":0.3273806304186078,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2102671823","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7002127,0.0061133537,0.0014860039,0.043103658,0.00013790547,0.0002811791,0.00053461414,0.00020984803,0.24792068],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98184764,0.0034464593,0.001560392,0.001910826,0.000024445128,0.00004323659,0.00011210398,0.000023155375,0.011031704],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9871181,0.0038051163,0.0003441656,0.00041658737,0.005523238,0.0027926737],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96220016,0.010530004,0.0030659668,0.00085775164,0.01652171,0.00682436],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010052668,0.00038733488,0.00039465367,0.006686812,0.034095023,0.011188872,0.0019887139,0.0013812372,0.0075609],"category_scores_gemma":[0.038081773,0.0003957568,0.00042720445,0.014214594,0.00580451,0.0037345611,0.006174116,0.0015178062,0.00058142544],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008584801,0.00054752326,0.21059588,0.0019921693,0.00006953652,0.0014468116,0.2823894,0.00060887495,0.0024965573,0.06971999,0.042215373,0.3870594],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000059456434,0.00034017678,0.31056604,0.00089270377,0.00015702404,0.00064810825,0.43061417,0.0011216305,0.0028247796,0.0049455445,0.24762759,0.000202753],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9627225,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9847244,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9986188,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10500057,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.20852289,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.76183605},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2104412709","doi":"","title":"Enseigner les stratégies de créacollage numérique pour éviter le plagiat au secondaire","year":2015,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Education / Revue canadienne de l éducation","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec en Outaouais","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.054002164530849814,"score_gpt":0.2868889092370124,"score_spread":0.23288674470616255,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2104412709","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.671775,0.005461762,0.026543234,0.01754427,0.0009559125,0.0011231571,0.0004667869,0.0014467591,0.27468315],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.84693414,0.0020998102,0.015390042,0.0016398596,0.0002598654,0.00043682347,0.00040296002,0.00026974812,0.13256665],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9929656,0.0029564204,0.00038993463,0.0005400433,0.0022970168,0.0008510168],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9617409,0.016021464,0.0052522714,0.0034260214,0.008469531,0.0050897654],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0078067495,0.0006977664,0.00067876856,0.0042298236,0.0052341446,0.007446533,0.001524014,0.001913192,0.03524104],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0475103,0.00034175234,0.00057651114,0.0023761606,0.002013422,0.0048324317,0.0050448542,0.002740418,0.00934819],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00057359796,0.0014692182,0.13061272,0.0016818689,0.000105743406,0.0010688081,0.18705498,0.0005593917,0.008623475,0.021300554,0.05070097,0.5962488],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009321382,0.0008842187,0.2215486,0.0019732963,0.000087961176,0.0015432433,0.14116481,0.0019911719,0.007334714,0.010483471,0.612604,0.00029123362],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012332104,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021563215,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9980868,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004118733,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0083270045,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11789304},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2107418313","doi":"10.1371/journal.pmed.1001406","title":"Policies and Initiatives Aimed at Addressing Research Misconduct in High-Income Countries","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"PLoS Medicine","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":71,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences; Health Canada; Research Councils UK; National Institutes of Health; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Misconduct; Scientific misconduct; High income countries; Research integrity; Political science; Developing country; Public relations; Medicine; Psychology; Economic growth; Law; Alternative medicine; Economics; Pathology","score_opus":0.17514744328383602,"score_gpt":0.41473932443503164,"score_spread":0.23959188115119562,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2107418313","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00048210463,0.0013841599,0.0001883223,0.9921657,0.0040466413,0.000014329558,0.00001446996,0.000019978259,0.0016843119],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00591584,0.0022724506,0.00067132106,0.98304087,0.006192072,0.000055670287,0.000019130752,0.000014089083,0.0018185951],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9619577,0.018379577,0.0055354643,0.0019011842,0.0076816403,0.0045443643],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.72697514,0.19520892,0.019102683,0.007338879,0.030474199,0.020900154],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.047619715,0.0008006102,0.0016041503,0.0026524717,0.013808385,0.011695413,0.003919523,0.07653124,0.0063834162],"category_scores_gemma":[0.19286008,0.0010488434,0.0019982536,0.0027830112,0.01557537,0.012214931,0.010495364,0.05199158,0.0028898667],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000447701,0.000078585515,0.0029726985,0.00036577444,0.000047488433,0.0013422067,0.0011175546,0.00016614483,0.00036701313,0.023650048,0.95097387,0.018873885],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026675776,0.00019135427,0.0069273068,0.0028380824,0.00010495263,0.0017157753,0.005050075,0.00084756844,0.0011436495,0.04935791,0.93132883,0.00022772847],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01196528,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020681215,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9523803,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010491714,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.032779276,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2518401},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"commentary","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"domain":"methods","study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"commentary","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W2108542401","doi":"10.1128/mbio.00156-13","title":"Are Men More Likely than Women To Commit Scientific Misconduct? Maybe, Maybe Not","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"mBio","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Women's Health Research Institute","funders":"National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion; National Institute of General Medical Sciences; National Institutes of Health","keywords":"Commit; Misconduct; Psychology; Competence (human resources); Scientific misconduct; Sexual misconduct; Criminology; Social psychology; Medicine; Political science; Law; Alternative medicine; Computer science","score_opus":0.04897697863324894,"score_gpt":0.2989171865200828,"score_spread":0.24994020788683388,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2108542401","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8574741,0.028067019,0.0027531483,0.073329225,0.0018056174,0.0001300835,0.0023824752,0.000060045375,0.03399837],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97897583,0.0039868983,0.0006013214,0.012768177,0.00085798564,0.00007486814,0.00039251993,0.000033804434,0.0023086336],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9937928,0.0023034378,0.0006033704,0.0012982046,0.001287281,0.00071496447],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96183,0.018888053,0.013179495,0.0015930955,0.0026607588,0.0018486489],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0072420104,0.0003381517,0.00071144424,0.0016338945,0.0013862639,0.0027159487,0.00074605667,0.0020104253,0.010503137],"category_scores_gemma":[0.057203308,0.00043815482,0.00063085643,0.0017219803,0.0020669852,0.0048052287,0.00087773707,0.0019096388,0.0017561385],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005093029,0.00013208076,0.87150836,0.00052363146,0.00044068968,0.00057878613,0.015713388,0.000036677884,0.00024821536,0.004122823,0.014973078,0.09121288],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007947242,0.0005727916,0.85583425,0.0017498463,0.0006553974,0.0039331275,0.060011536,0.00023934663,0.0008105166,0.015402974,0.060552552,0.00015824704],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0055323755,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0046173194,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9979896,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00055903726,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009446586,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03829986},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2109391703","doi":"10.1037/a0020773","title":"Identifying and profiling scholastic cheaters: Their personality, cognitive ability, and motivation.","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Applied","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":339,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Cheating; Psychopathy; Machiavellianism; Personality; Agreeableness; Dark triad; Social psychology; Clinical psychology; Developmental psychology; Big Five personality traits; Extraversion and introversion","score_opus":0.05635516793987502,"score_gpt":0.3882577167342087,"score_spread":0.3319025487943337,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2109391703","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9989875,0.00007444695,0.00011732092,0.00005817857,0.0000028687582,0.000009308314,0.000076524775,0.0000043071154,0.00066953164],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993274,0.00005078282,0.00018433506,0.000017425873,0.00000365431,0.0000053778585,0.00010576472,0.0000013593597,0.00030387135],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99957424,0.00013555896,0.0000583162,0.000042826232,0.00012399937,0.00006511055],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99227303,0.0011753492,0.0044552106,0.00043009856,0.00060806226,0.0010581199],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015959927,0.00019649415,0.00020692301,0.0011479493,0.00035798262,0.0010802967,0.00026536032,0.0003319479,0.0016214348],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008392108,0.000113210095,0.0002039288,0.00052458333,0.00052111375,0.00061878975,0.0007590342,0.0006211237,0.0004014443],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038432383,0.000076133874,0.9934335,0.000011382162,0.000015518628,0.00003531874,0.0005056918,0.00001813988,0.00037729408,0.000037242524,0.00008541622,0.00536608],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000016041996,0.0000874261,0.9985481,0.000004650271,0.000004336464,0.00013835767,0.00072074245,0.00012992308,0.00014433633,0.000043788048,0.00017272244,0.000003990258],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009365317,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002383923,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99966806,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024250921,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026411217,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.008440495},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2115499001","doi":"10.5539/ies.v7n6p66","title":"Influence of Neutralization Attitude in Academic Dishonesty among Undergraduates","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Education Studies","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cheating; Academic dishonesty; Psychology; Feeling; Social psychology; Dishonesty; Neutralization","score_opus":0.04954464114664774,"score_gpt":0.42103058508355834,"score_spread":0.3714859439369106,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2115499001","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99910176,0.000039147028,0.000041307223,0.00004804286,0.00000372213,0.000005382765,0.000005625166,0.0000015706249,0.00075354136],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99970764,0.00002949324,0.00003118954,0.000015218871,0.0000031998352,0.0000016446854,0.000005244765,5.7052347e-7,0.00020567239],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99812037,0.00071061554,0.00017355145,0.00013276469,0.0006372353,0.00022538807],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98643166,0.004377618,0.004843782,0.00078704784,0.0012047592,0.0023551558],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016253291,0.0002478014,0.0002504359,0.0007731981,0.0006989584,0.0014978659,0.00022200236,0.0005834394,0.0020772133],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010473053,0.00019175721,0.00038765607,0.0003824461,0.0010327293,0.00030710472,0.00060948473,0.001171051,0.000318656],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016800508,0.0004924795,0.9841291,0.000022886776,0.000044494715,0.00015197664,0.0056119235,0.0000373789,0.0023180444,0.00011392277,0.00007798885,0.0068318467],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004344408,0.00035103713,0.99367297,0.000014519139,0.000022523936,0.00015309411,0.0044889646,0.00022648575,0.0006432877,0.0000873162,0.0003222264,0.000013307562],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021679942,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026342233,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9994166,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004566305,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00050769415,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.008595645},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2121693989","doi":"10.19173/irrodl.v14i5.1541","title":"Institutional level identity control strategies in the distance education environment: A survey of administrative staff","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Athabasca University","funders":"","keywords":"Distance education; Higher education; Academic freedom; Openness to experience; Accreditation; Public relations; Psychology; Medical education; Sociology; Pedagogy; Political science; Medicine; Social psychology","score_opus":0.19816477979878222,"score_gpt":0.48962813965434426,"score_spread":0.29146335985556204,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2121693989","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9993806,0.000101403464,0.0000599485,0.00011095763,0.0000026762486,0.000009973594,0.000022592772,0.000002173282,0.00030981144],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992418,0.00020074447,0.000081811704,0.00013388504,0.0000037289517,0.000016990825,0.000020615975,0.0000017282199,0.00029877486],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960985,0.0014902959,0.00042732156,0.00026641166,0.00092826603,0.00078917854],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9870171,0.0032302293,0.0053266953,0.0005070498,0.0021125844,0.0018063172],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0054668034,0.00012699749,0.00027254072,0.0009406328,0.0014821388,0.0019907078,0.0007360143,0.00065418426,0.0013674658],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012030764,0.0003021052,0.00020559768,0.0015215867,0.0011111425,0.0014695786,0.0014120936,0.00068246876,0.00065425655],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000077854405,0.00040131182,0.9067293,0.00010413819,0.000015255971,0.00019622965,0.065356605,0.00006225953,0.0006928475,0.00019591978,0.00075409113,0.025414264],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007320949,0.00082314626,0.74735963,0.00011517959,0.000013497274,0.00023191153,0.24693497,0.00019476943,0.00033169618,0.00007496566,0.003884671,0.000028221073],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009314618,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010968746,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009314618,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016102607,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002710005,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02891159},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2122553096","doi":"10.22230/cjc.2006v31n1a1595","title":"Why They Lie: Probing the Explanations for Journalistic Cheating","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Communication","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Cheating; Journalism; Dysfunctional family; Action (physics); Sociology; Media studies; Political science; Epistemology; Public relations; Psychology; Social psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03772767088926128,"score_gpt":0.3007222824624677,"score_spread":0.2629946115732064,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2122553096","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2792551,0.022971183,0.018804083,0.45751968,0.003089465,0.00014617942,0.00017817105,0.00026538724,0.21777077],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97380865,0.0040820474,0.0018099375,0.012290409,0.00087836804,0.00006446396,0.000055550525,0.00009385758,0.0069166794],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98424846,0.010909352,0.0004734436,0.0006786046,0.0023519075,0.0013381903],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.90899,0.07000887,0.011311634,0.0029625574,0.005259506,0.0014675217],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013329668,0.0006939089,0.000522414,0.0041665966,0.01161116,0.010947061,0.003758762,0.013881815,0.00426571],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07190665,0.0006850737,0.0006795472,0.0026507832,0.04717937,0.017097943,0.0050041196,0.010093069,0.00075376575],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006882021,0.00006709643,0.006429912,0.00026753778,0.000033598688,0.0019159446,0.52903455,0.00018111354,0.00021204013,0.42949823,0.020540735,0.011750468],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000050415143,0.000050568462,0.0062435116,0.0009428616,0.000036411566,0.0019501831,0.60547245,0.0010681801,0.0007394525,0.17060341,0.21272436,0.00011822914],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008982941,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011623441,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9861182,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007181987,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0045108097,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07049489},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2123696324","doi":"10.1002/lary.24294","title":"Current incidence of duplicate publication in otolaryngology","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"The Laryngoscope","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"BC Children's Hospital; Vancouver General Hospital","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Otorhinolaryngology; Subspecialty; Incidence (geometry); Index (typography); MEDLINE; Retrospective cohort study; Bibliometrics; Family medicine; Surgery; Library science; World Wide Web; Computer science","score_opus":0.06960365930966181,"score_gpt":0.3907845364719754,"score_spread":0.3211808771623136,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2123696324","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"reporting","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"reporting","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7282462,0.23635161,0.010331445,0.005816015,0.0010851906,0.0011131151,0.0068203933,0.00021797506,0.01001795],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9577318,0.029655041,0.0071640196,0.0012376056,0.0005822855,0.0005194853,0.0024724095,0.000049025377,0.00058827904],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.86870366,0.03905324,0.047512203,0.010278346,0.032982413,0.0014701051],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.38677338,0.34216645,0.16518025,0.03410157,0.06927073,0.0025076217],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_broad","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0949967,0.0005112567,0.0019818463,0.02588268,0.0012585135,0.0045514125,0.001947948,0.0016654474,0.0022217669],"category_scores_gemma":[0.37560785,0.0006275953,0.0019438429,0.019336414,0.00299721,0.0041153547,0.0027737445,0.0007559609,0.00074693206],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006582564,0.000110494686,0.8441632,0.02055661,0.0024011128,0.003932589,0.004457906,0.00019195103,0.0013441012,0.0018236609,0.0038836498,0.116476476],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019372563,0.00076784304,0.84539795,0.026808433,0.0063600237,0.0597177,0.009294447,0.0012903003,0.006756253,0.0071435617,0.036034822,0.00023487797],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010812959,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012523804,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9983345,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022863802,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00390525,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5023966},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2128494972","doi":"","title":"Challenges of Maintaining Academic Integrity in an Age of Collaboration, Sharing and Social Networking","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"ScholarSpace (University of Hawaii at Manoa)","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Columbia College","funders":"","keywords":"Academic integrity; Cheating; Viewpoints; Public relations; Academic dishonesty; Academic community; The Internet; Psychology; Internet privacy; Medical education; Business; Engineering ethics; Political science; Sociology; Computer science; Engineering; World Wide Web; Medicine; Social psychology","score_opus":0.04547444812164021,"score_gpt":0.30533369580770603,"score_spread":0.25985924768606583,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2128494972","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24533553,0.008224019,0.0122580305,0.5712046,0.0023064944,0.00012105727,0.000080313264,0.0002526199,0.1602173],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9529364,0.006096105,0.0047709583,0.015826637,0.0017782176,0.00009604358,0.000039782448,0.00008056411,0.018375358],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9771678,0.0130576175,0.0011182318,0.0010750479,0.0047405395,0.0028406922],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9410366,0.017396638,0.011252817,0.004528083,0.009526768,0.016259056],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016418764,0.00040363905,0.0006047048,0.001944432,0.027862255,0.022723364,0.0024091948,0.006555427,0.00546396],"category_scores_gemma":[0.041092496,0.0004434849,0.0005921532,0.0021529172,0.017426223,0.026125897,0.016159786,0.010194416,0.0021400454],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017327617,0.0004994234,0.034290567,0.0004818803,0.00008476768,0.003985176,0.4125381,0.0008357813,0.0020429806,0.2434604,0.082968175,0.21863948],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027689443,0.0002477649,0.011612638,0.00055245165,0.000027653157,0.003697257,0.455034,0.0009070654,0.0010445184,0.13391909,0.39278385,0.00014594449],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003897243,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0058816737,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99344456,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004563187,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010585835,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08683181},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2128972778","doi":"10.5430/jnep.v3n7p30","title":"Innovative teaching strategy for promoting academic integrity in simulation","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Nursing Education and Practice","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Facilitator; Flexibility (engineering); Plan (archaeology); Computer science; Medical education; Psychology; Mathematics education; Knowledge management; Medicine; Social psychology; Management","score_opus":0.1562800497682717,"score_gpt":0.5130558225256463,"score_spread":0.3567757727573746,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2128972778","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1912363,0.0009859629,0.612654,0.03574083,0.0016203729,0.002078468,0.00007886785,0.0027217532,0.15288348],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5184971,0.0010577469,0.45648167,0.0025509235,0.00037788125,0.0010419736,0.00007642338,0.00013071088,0.019785533],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9952231,0.0032015638,0.00014459487,0.00021984048,0.00094616844,0.00026477542],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9940455,0.002548976,0.00048822863,0.0007949901,0.0009613824,0.0011608507],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004554676,0.00067666423,0.00031023464,0.0011299438,0.0015905123,0.0034868654,0.0026901325,0.0019198651,0.006925574],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0091516785,0.00027290033,0.00070903834,0.0005235725,0.0018068651,0.002875924,0.004433662,0.0022015593,0.0015194359],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00033928215,0.0055572265,0.0069770208,0.0012110175,0.00011658386,0.0013966004,0.038471963,0.01428504,0.022447713,0.17701946,0.036901664,0.69527644],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008079557,0.0057807034,0.008015756,0.0023066427,0.00026984932,0.006560598,0.037974842,0.11265131,0.04247047,0.21651119,0.5662336,0.0004170605],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003661069,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010217816,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99808013,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014536136,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036308975,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024087727},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2130837514","doi":"10.18438/b8qk6d","title":"Open Access Works are as Reliable as Other Publishing Models at Retracting Flawed Articles from the Biomedical Literature","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Evidence Based Library and Information Practice","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Computer science; Impact factor; Library science; Publishing; Citation analysis; Identifier; Information retrieval; World Wide Web; Data science; Medicine; Political science","score_opus":0.04358300162453899,"score_gpt":0.33432642449389394,"score_spread":0.29074342286935495,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2130837514","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015037848,0.2454275,0.103687964,0.27238,0.07480867,0.005273173,0.011861263,0.0039024013,0.26762116],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.22431889,0.34208125,0.2089173,0.07552244,0.06260667,0.009151893,0.013164753,0.004926251,0.059310623],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.53070366,0.16003746,0.10338906,0.014587663,0.1870239,0.0042581866],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.10169623,0.46142343,0.115422495,0.09760115,0.21667854,0.007178181],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","open_science","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.32996598,0.0020610099,0.005107147,0.068064794,0.0053073545,0.04357144,0.00610629,0.009331738,0.04976594],"category_scores_gemma":[0.7588712,0.0029371697,0.005376387,0.06591058,0.009875355,0.049274914,0.015888346,0.007862916,0.033079937],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006781711,0.00022231531,0.015128052,0.03908646,0.0025497791,0.0006163811,0.0067096674,0.0005456367,0.0011264522,0.05590062,0.21532457,0.6621119],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035327554,0.00034431086,0.011161877,0.04508615,0.0022647195,0.0014184545,0.0054690046,0.000711819,0.0016107598,0.059654325,0.8715238,0.00040153065],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002030472,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0037473764,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9938937,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0066500814,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.023443475,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.82627124},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2134227405","doi":"10.2304/plat.2009.8.1.46","title":"Academic Folk Wisdom: Fact, Fiction and Falderal","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Psychology Learning & Teaching","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"The King's University; Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Cheating; Mathematics education; Psychology; Multiple choice; Sitting; Social psychology; Linguistics; Philosophy; Medicine","score_opus":0.03066645053622027,"score_gpt":0.3848442236321092,"score_spread":0.35417777309588894,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2134227405","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05195943,0.056175414,0.009888288,0.6052152,0.017706012,0.000025285048,0.00020808625,0.00017979689,0.2586425],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85158044,0.017562408,0.004506284,0.055043146,0.021015361,0.000035998288,0.00013637134,0.00017225936,0.04994772],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99662066,0.0016200376,0.0001251205,0.00046750123,0.00090773136,0.0002589557],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97619903,0.015614685,0.001907033,0.0027158626,0.0026609313,0.00090248726],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0050696963,0.00034205872,0.00049601065,0.0026163703,0.0061952383,0.0086903805,0.0010079684,0.0024171385,0.0062439805],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03178505,0.00017502965,0.0002495778,0.0022912887,0.03230272,0.010551789,0.0029355588,0.00515004,0.0016266815],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009661417,0.000038595004,0.0038301088,0.00021650134,0.000022769249,0.0005376124,0.04773389,0.00017739739,0.00023016336,0.6779491,0.18866673,0.08050054],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007493844,0.000028479106,0.0025813717,0.0004095482,0.000008851195,0.0008181584,0.017866142,0.00022118345,0.0002560055,0.26750442,0.71026844,0.00002986717],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027583803,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004846964,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99758285,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026206009,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019048206,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02681148},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2135880542","doi":"10.5539/res.v4n1p245","title":"Factors That Predispose Secondary School Teachers to Examination Malpractice in Edo State, Nigeria","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of European Studies","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Malpractice; Government (linguistics); Anomie; Psychology; Medical education; Descriptive statistics; Data collection; Mathematics education; Medicine; Social psychology; Political science; Law; Social science; Sociology; Statistics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.09570197996099143,"score_gpt":0.38177427309208867,"score_spread":0.2860722931310972,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2135880542","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9977496,0.0011238682,0.000042387488,0.0002156586,0.0000053986455,0.000008163715,0.000011139104,0.0000010010375,0.0008427745],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988028,0.0009501084,0.000046524085,0.000028491808,0.0000044686362,0.000002451943,0.00001081886,3.730206e-7,0.00015382137],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99917006,0.00029701876,0.00015038963,0.0000603249,0.00019822846,0.00012400621],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99411136,0.0012977492,0.0036905957,0.00014266274,0.00040096795,0.00035674512],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008231021,0.00012589978,0.00017868228,0.0010627725,0.00080867094,0.0008335428,0.00017359594,0.00039289147,0.0018835353],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00660405,0.00018426904,0.00011710479,0.0007434878,0.0005352084,0.00047458117,0.0005984982,0.0003529418,0.00012723156],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002659638,0.0000623357,0.98805225,0.000081836886,0.000005723358,0.0006441437,0.0034064073,0.000018140288,0.00024698913,0.00009658001,0.000120487384,0.0072385184],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000001740432,0.00009562893,0.97605217,0.00016983456,0.00000945603,0.00143282,0.020831758,0.00003574868,0.00012203209,0.00007002256,0.0011742928,0.000004526905],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004366379,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008169367,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9996071,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00035436792,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010803564,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.008681893},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2138673945","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-8519.2010.01878.x","title":"PUBLISHING BIOETHICS AND <i>BIOETHICS</i> – REFLECTIONS ON ACADEMIC PUBLISHING BY A JOURNAL EDITOR","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Bioethics","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Bioethics; Enforcement; Impact factor; Political science; Academic integrity; Library science; Sociology; Media studies; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.1326022758257028,"score_gpt":0.4165539731657215,"score_spread":0.2839516973400187,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2138673945","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00042455771,0.0057658874,0.00014897707,0.96462804,0.027258407,0.0000029812225,0.0000033577335,0.000009907553,0.0017579824],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.04274993,0.025053194,0.0019999563,0.76686466,0.14890814,0.000033277465,0.00001836048,0.00021002821,0.0141625],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.94458455,0.027083684,0.0049829297,0.0034957894,0.01565357,0.004199518],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.73201776,0.19007875,0.0141394185,0.007969336,0.036635987,0.019158699],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.07879748,0.000826062,0.0016278814,0.0016829019,0.018770576,0.04042983,0.0045752996,0.033267085,0.005116447],"category_scores_gemma":[0.18500692,0.0010747976,0.0018183794,0.0028323869,0.027759643,0.044664253,0.009087647,0.051987417,0.0021435237],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011193222,0.00006398571,0.0006347357,0.00040438055,0.000040900464,0.0007711197,0.011563532,0.00010278473,0.00021377506,0.10727963,0.84980917,0.029003965],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000045558165,0.00006614012,0.00036556798,0.00062142813,0.000025413201,0.0005622797,0.007317798,0.00010602889,0.00031979504,0.03247649,0.95801663,0.00007687424],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033234449,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0043997453,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9667329,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009112798,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019263493,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41672587},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2139136071","doi":"10.1503/cmaj.109-3827","title":"Shedding light on retractions","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Medical Association Journal","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Phrase; Computer science; Word (group theory); World Wide Web; Linguistics; Natural language processing; Philosophy","score_opus":0.018181727781629475,"score_gpt":0.27380408683925395,"score_spread":0.2556223590576245,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2139136071","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00033798142,0.0037307579,0.0012492076,0.43608207,0.5533389,0.00014375501,0.00017968573,0.00032349108,0.0046142293],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.012480863,0.0089100925,0.007272057,0.575325,0.36078325,0.0009747667,0.00033488564,0.0014273834,0.032491673],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.68013436,0.082996815,0.06500116,0.013206442,0.14299501,0.015666228],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.22673611,0.3648667,0.048442565,0.040334247,0.2930565,0.02656395],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.21567604,0.003280503,0.0046238457,0.008513674,0.01398239,0.034895007,0.008343993,0.05430502,0.025069313],"category_scores_gemma":[0.7841221,0.0027779844,0.0059954426,0.008690372,0.016297301,0.016484719,0.011843787,0.08104677,0.022310406],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036621066,0.000015735692,0.000098735356,0.0004325869,0.00002840621,0.00024332119,0.0007200842,0.00003449469,0.00016626583,0.005339097,0.9810557,0.011828959],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004212392,0.000044295495,0.000393487,0.0019801448,0.000042615633,0.00033206484,0.001004423,0.0001915343,0.00034971468,0.009678635,0.98584586,0.00009505138],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034628755,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0036198706,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.945695,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012604311,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.031257343,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96721107},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2140455418","doi":"10.1177/0340035205052640","title":"Unreliable Research: are librarians liable?","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"IFLA Journal","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Deception; Reputation; Publication; Public relations; Sociology; Library science; Law; Political science; Psychology; Internet privacy; Computer science","score_opus":0.1250591299389625,"score_gpt":0.39955967407138837,"score_spread":0.27450054413242586,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2140455418","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05546622,0.028597118,0.026218293,0.7507541,0.001903965,0.00016089829,0.000102470774,0.00041472734,0.1363822],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8193153,0.026975635,0.007163516,0.10225182,0.0055884835,0.00024755596,0.00014648795,0.00024722872,0.038063962],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9065474,0.05815224,0.006445504,0.0029609487,0.020821327,0.0050725234],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.450426,0.37120754,0.079580225,0.028838774,0.060940027,0.009007385],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.087519124,0.0006851641,0.0011504084,0.009388421,0.021498755,0.025536796,0.0032163803,0.015086289,0.007326027],"category_scores_gemma":[0.3709644,0.0009554456,0.0007724237,0.009713828,0.028485198,0.031700794,0.010640245,0.010104156,0.005998848],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022975693,0.00017285484,0.050996702,0.0010497222,0.00010126422,0.0037447691,0.17161357,0.00042832704,0.00027201237,0.33823496,0.16801405,0.26514208],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000050511426,0.0003055924,0.013511417,0.0050793444,0.00018808607,0.007533789,0.16206841,0.0019995414,0.0016447973,0.29971504,0.5076463,0.00025712265],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0055248435,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007285535,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9849137,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009861699,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013827768,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.46285093},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2144035663","doi":"10.1007/978-3-642-55352-3_8","title":"Examining Instructional Interventions: Encouraging Academic Integrity Through Active Learning Approaches","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"New frontiers of educational research","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Cheating; Academic integrity; Misconduct; Honesty; Psychology; Academic dishonesty; Psychological intervention; Engineering ethics; Social psychology; Pedagogy; Medical education; Political science; Medicine; Engineering; Law","score_opus":0.39095255694787434,"score_gpt":0.4443086345706295,"score_spread":0.05335607762275518,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2144035663","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17016044,0.043364517,0.10810794,0.035327647,0.0020555195,0.0013666236,0.00016751816,0.0011162537,0.63833356],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.71088725,0.037851155,0.115544595,0.0060023167,0.00072173605,0.0017202288,0.00017777289,0.00020892281,0.12688601],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99848217,0.0008041493,0.000054846714,0.00013623171,0.00044941524,0.000073188006],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9917921,0.0065933703,0.0005039125,0.00033741255,0.0003887368,0.00038446722],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003026921,0.00044242147,0.00033535715,0.00069164665,0.0007733333,0.002618285,0.0016135996,0.0012908833,0.008570222],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0093115475,0.00014151454,0.00027156027,0.0004385524,0.001849055,0.002492442,0.0018647583,0.0020542254,0.001061039],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007327929,0.001625077,0.0011606405,0.0012392256,0.000023123448,0.000074205054,0.008180438,0.00032821338,0.002718532,0.047826722,0.015590678,0.9211599],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00045795253,0.004845503,0.025401901,0.011328981,0.00046563844,0.0014191484,0.027367713,0.004018423,0.048373822,0.3576415,0.51857406,0.000105306324],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00044972447,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013082462,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99870914,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010975652,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029268002,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028670251},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2151371905","doi":"10.1590/s1516-31802005000500008","title":"Authorship: an ethical dilemma of science","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Sao Paulo Medical Journal","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":48,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scientific misconduct; Medicine; Rigour; Context (archaeology); Misconduct; Dilemma; Ethical standards; Public relations; Engineering ethics; Political science; Alternative medicine; Law","score_opus":0.0935405047284181,"score_gpt":0.46141426884840153,"score_spread":0.3678737641199834,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2151371905","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004591871,0.49356046,0.017130332,0.45285326,0.0068382155,0.00013386365,0.000032215266,0.000033896096,0.024825912],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.38599658,0.40103632,0.027998881,0.15491866,0.024003891,0.0010078243,0.00004483454,0.00006495236,0.004928119],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.7090445,0.23891129,0.014727127,0.005387134,0.029878002,0.002051869],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.48086533,0.46219155,0.025869831,0.011762093,0.015623378,0.0036877694],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.123364784,0.00083256204,0.0022799412,0.0037998161,0.0057069515,0.009913576,0.0030706848,0.01432931,0.0016676886],"category_scores_gemma":[0.20947117,0.0006486569,0.0008288817,0.005558084,0.060049888,0.016219756,0.0088251,0.011976435,0.00072243105],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008491846,0.00004846049,0.0021271904,0.011568053,0.00019831223,0.0030639283,0.03441324,0.00046821017,0.00032744088,0.7206546,0.04253037,0.18451521],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007000819,0.00009402348,0.00096387154,0.024437735,0.0000819698,0.008569317,0.019705134,0.0002509223,0.00025847869,0.6549891,0.29051453,0.00006487586],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00089363457,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00121954,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9856707,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004666735,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02602213,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.65242314},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2153924055","doi":"10.1038/srep03146","title":"The Retraction Penalty: Evidence from the Web of Science","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientific Reports","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":195,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"Army Research Laboratory; National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences; Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency; Northwestern University","keywords":"Citation; Computer science; Web of science; Range (aeronautics); Information retrieval; Data science; Library science; MEDLINE; Biology; Engineering","score_opus":0.03457540002935245,"score_gpt":0.31657274859956896,"score_spread":0.2819973485702165,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2153924055","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.628783,0.08135696,0.015101,0.0919531,0.0026791713,0.00040050535,0.0058906563,0.00066642155,0.17316924],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9732421,0.012796093,0.0030254615,0.003821341,0.0016077557,0.00012412756,0.001576685,0.00024004494,0.0035663084],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.92968094,0.029587291,0.0074753766,0.0067898235,0.02402036,0.0024461632],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.20200238,0.5473651,0.14799383,0.05475787,0.0411698,0.0067109927],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0574989,0.00074350054,0.0013539921,0.011281492,0.0027756195,0.01005301,0.003141544,0.0040517296,0.02871511],"category_scores_gemma":[0.5620697,0.00072963926,0.0012253982,0.014132136,0.0072673345,0.015026065,0.0058179987,0.0042182147,0.007025308],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00795401,0.0008350168,0.45813662,0.0076596956,0.0025803603,0.0016842895,0.013036221,0.002096955,0.0010336941,0.054948937,0.051575977,0.39845818],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012021764,0.0015759884,0.6776579,0.0060200584,0.0019778404,0.0064771804,0.011066084,0.0062637967,0.0035583272,0.12387457,0.15988286,0.00044316667],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003502814,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015530991,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99594826,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014808683,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034854375,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30408686},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2154797916","doi":"10.5539/ies.v7n7p52","title":"Ethical and Unethical Methods of Plagiarism Prevention in Academic Writing","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"International Education Studies","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Plagiarism detection; Cheating; Similarity (geometry); Unconscious mind; Accidental; Psychology; Computer science; Engineering ethics; Mathematics education; Engineering; Social psychology; Artificial intelligence; Image (mathematics); Physics; Psychoanalysis","score_opus":0.1246345453261066,"score_gpt":0.5395094053852052,"score_spread":0.41487486005909857,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2154797916","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09823531,0.04155112,0.6677059,0.017026246,0.0024125264,0.001350246,0.00017177228,0.003266689,0.16828017],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.46965224,0.015850866,0.4523234,0.0015741109,0.0016763923,0.00081496104,0.00019545564,0.0006152951,0.057297226],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.973457,0.013123094,0.0014557261,0.0012354729,0.010391162,0.00033757705],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93252534,0.03548695,0.007894676,0.012026825,0.011118647,0.0009475506],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0113158235,0.00090535166,0.00047275485,0.0054371683,0.002971801,0.0052231397,0.0021093406,0.001247634,0.0051996037],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05805125,0.0005241013,0.0006976347,0.002861036,0.005868423,0.005742918,0.0029270689,0.002614588,0.0019559304],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010172801,0.00023871423,0.007491438,0.0018026306,0.000083790495,0.00033461745,0.009373809,0.0011209568,0.009290402,0.08618743,0.01595868,0.8680158],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018598253,0.0010641044,0.029461354,0.003986708,0.00050209445,0.012522906,0.011105393,0.016171215,0.09614955,0.22207338,0.6063215,0.0004557835],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003562139,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007553491,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99875236,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014973903,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028148512,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.059844494},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["research_integrity"],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"other","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["research_integrity"],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"other","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2155056246","doi":"10.1093/comjnl/bxs018","title":"A Source Code Similarity System for Plagiarism Detection","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Computer Journal","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":109,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Athabasca University","funders":"","keywords":"Library science; Computer science; Similarity (geometry); Information retrieval; Source code; World Wide Web; Database; Operating system; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.03357069603471791,"score_gpt":0.294971855487683,"score_spread":0.2614011594529651,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2155056246","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04420534,0.0003884406,0.7694525,0.0003423735,0.00014232087,0.0021788543,0.0026761773,0.176255,0.0043589743],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1919053,0.00026762093,0.7892629,0.00019842784,0.000116393676,0.0012867328,0.007908975,0.0025711244,0.006482523],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9948626,0.0007821222,0.0009842059,0.0011189652,0.0020895815,0.00016250792],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9809137,0.004467306,0.0024790266,0.0035026118,0.007959499,0.0006779253],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005108945,0.0010365084,0.0012078069,0.009843413,0.0012280295,0.0016697628,0.0015299625,0.0017604697,0.0064006397],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023509372,0.0006553412,0.00075028575,0.0036390128,0.00058022747,0.003279973,0.002210915,0.0014606105,0.005520111],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00076625583,0.00069214083,0.017874926,0.0010094191,0.00018212691,0.00064039737,0.0011755527,0.0029199475,0.081843294,0.004546536,0.03031723,0.85803217],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006713851,0.0023599481,0.10621692,0.0004080355,0.00044278748,0.0061179185,0.00085976673,0.40405735,0.3362769,0.010639415,0.13116904,0.00078052306],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018709439,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014912752,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9982395,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00075539335,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001960662,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.027018964},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2155099782","doi":"10.1023/a:1012877008434","title":"Validity Evidence for the Different Item Styles of Overt Honesty Measures","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Business and Psychology","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University; Royal Military College of Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Honesty; Construct (python library); Dishonesty; Social psychology; Industrial and organizational psychology; Construct validity; Academic dishonesty; Psychometrics; Cognitive psychology; Cheating; Developmental psychology","score_opus":0.2505994158698308,"score_gpt":0.402127394328431,"score_spread":0.15152797845860017,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2155099782","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9044145,0.0029334605,0.034648657,0.00399356,0.001540339,0.0014928302,0.0012516301,0.00023275186,0.049492344],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9777444,0.0005755456,0.0148262,0.001284274,0.00041505412,0.0012460332,0.0014364722,0.00042253075,0.0020495357],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.87728906,0.055616695,0.013823434,0.013909356,0.035625987,0.003735564],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.29608774,0.5784773,0.030094163,0.040638573,0.050415076,0.004287105],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.12103463,0.0019659025,0.0018195793,0.0062354533,0.00355125,0.0058340393,0.0034491182,0.0053834645,0.008194344],"category_scores_gemma":[0.32793292,0.0027707836,0.005251949,0.0037219527,0.008969728,0.0060664024,0.006194334,0.005243931,0.0028770305],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.004039886,0.0012437105,0.9152078,0.0005542892,0.0025125549,0.00016205286,0.009757035,0.001316263,0.0054927566,0.013336897,0.0021296148,0.04424704],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012567065,0.002503588,0.9474268,0.00073559774,0.001061611,0.0008475011,0.004088958,0.009998449,0.007062105,0.019066598,0.005665806,0.00028623096],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026739493,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004068016,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12103463,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025116594,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024253537,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.64009994},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2159983530","doi":"10.5455/aim.2012.20.136-140","title":"Cooperation Between Research Institutions and Journals on Research Integrity Cases: Guidance from the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE)","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Acta Informatica Medica","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Statens Serum Institut; University of California, San Diego; Cross River University of Technology; University of Minnesota; Karolinska Institutet; University of Aberdeen; Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro; University of Connecticut; Monash University; Cardiff University; University of New South Wales; York University; Sveučilište u Zagrebu; Christian Medical College, Vellore; University of Oxford; Nanyang Technological University","keywords":"Scientific misconduct; Misconduct; Publication; Safeguarding; Officer; Suspect; Research integrity; Research ethics; Publishing; Political science; Public relations; Publish or perish; Psychology; Law; Engineering ethics; Medicine; Engineering; Alternative medicine","score_opus":0.5231173335945136,"score_gpt":0.5377257422074923,"score_spread":0.01460840861297863,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2159983530","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004325898,0.004957997,0.05629767,0.81032157,0.016218059,0.018699491,0.0005887244,0.0015965217,0.08699402],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.049041126,0.008691335,0.3664328,0.44034263,0.012247432,0.046548806,0.0010436922,0.0022469636,0.07340528],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.44194236,0.36332962,0.0940803,0.00946507,0.07470469,0.016477926],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.19779201,0.44272426,0.045094345,0.0753505,0.20164344,0.037395455],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.4923226,0.0017981773,0.0040721446,0.0059578037,0.012535084,0.037108373,0.008224889,0.061603617,0.010680277],"category_scores_gemma":[0.64260536,0.005376772,0.0038249034,0.0078917155,0.018440511,0.025561174,0.01783561,0.03699002,0.020793132],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018640296,0.00032630097,0.0019955589,0.0011600534,0.000056287507,0.0011029722,0.011628486,0.00038868946,0.0014473988,0.03410063,0.89234966,0.055257488],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002535908,0.00014132154,0.0020966565,0.0042715888,0.000058655052,0.002016532,0.006217069,0.0010688198,0.0016665115,0.029917445,0.95194036,0.00035135786],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0046844603,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010114143,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9383964,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01246928,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1614913,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6260566},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["research_integrity","scholarly_communication"],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"methods","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["research_integrity"],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"commentary","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2165266545","doi":"10.5430/jnep.v3n3p27","title":"The impact of a journal club intervention on student perceptions and behaviours regarding academic dishonesty","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Nursing Education and Practice","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Academic dishonesty; Feeling; Academic integrity; Dishonesty; Psychology; Intervention (counseling); Club; Journal club; Cheating; Perception; Medical education; Conversation; Nursing; Medicine; Social psychology","score_opus":0.09243726552090123,"score_gpt":0.5247019383121752,"score_spread":0.4322646727912739,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2165266545","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9965508,0.00014838367,0.00017071041,0.00040737566,0.00012600512,0.0007327187,0.00003968339,0.000049298782,0.0017749965],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9936572,0.0003203871,0.0021509249,0.00032942937,0.000106470325,0.0021261356,0.000062599094,0.000008565389,0.0012383604],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976419,0.0011085467,0.00020646221,0.00019204903,0.00034658134,0.0005044619],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9818558,0.007651335,0.0019275999,0.0006035697,0.0014922397,0.006469367],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034395761,0.00052774523,0.00087822817,0.00059401494,0.0017383901,0.0013168016,0.0010691641,0.0012197281,0.005453026],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016770158,0.00030732324,0.0006582381,0.00035962622,0.00067015085,0.0006365909,0.0016960689,0.0016887216,0.0005912238],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.020140337,0.2994825,0.079048365,0.0052279546,0.0004039906,0.001413941,0.036467902,0.0006604044,0.014922916,0.00038741322,0.0054006064,0.53644365],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0094630895,0.25747445,0.679813,0.0015900253,0.0007600583,0.00039926596,0.02766113,0.0015904824,0.007816372,0.0006572915,0.012623624,0.000151188],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011762634,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024820536,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99878025,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007965117,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035563328,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01824218},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2167242076","doi":"","title":"Honors, Honor Codes, and Academic Integrity: Where Do They Converge and Diverge?","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Lincoln (University of Nebraska)","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Honor; Academic integrity; Pledge; Sociology; Law; Psychology; Political science; Social psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.02763639106498508,"score_gpt":0.25322822175785825,"score_spread":0.22559183069287317,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2167242076","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18051007,0.13428959,0.017814301,0.39286825,0.0038319398,0.00014217992,0.00042457005,0.00018066292,0.2699384],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9390276,0.032612365,0.005086334,0.015164468,0.0023878692,0.00014156692,0.00019821661,0.0001998589,0.0051817554],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9853475,0.008041435,0.0007320653,0.0013444168,0.0032379501,0.0012967127],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94198793,0.029403102,0.008220639,0.00393496,0.010312245,0.0061410554],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017611887,0.00062203873,0.0016721173,0.00904804,0.006351188,0.023658225,0.0024950088,0.004084767,0.008981918],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06309997,0.00082238833,0.00050951215,0.009203441,0.047800265,0.041577857,0.018089496,0.010828879,0.001426427],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001755458,0.00012767562,0.040301666,0.00041350615,0.000110424735,0.00018488431,0.11100184,0.000118385105,0.00014964865,0.61877966,0.013522591,0.21511427],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000043056883,0.00014553098,0.09465807,0.0037207159,0.00010565252,0.0005076358,0.17042798,0.00044965505,0.00016830688,0.6329285,0.09667546,0.00016952811],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013708012,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01502142,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99591523,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006308207,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008238615,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.093141675},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2167255727","doi":"10.21913/ijei.v7i1.744","title":"YouTube: An international platform for sharing methods of cheating","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal for Educational Integrity","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cheating; Popularity; Upload; Demographics; Psychology; Internet privacy; Multimedia; Computer science; Sociology; World Wide Web; Social psychology","score_opus":0.21693531073456523,"score_gpt":0.5119126823771453,"score_spread":0.29497737164258003,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2167255727","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.66853327,0.007908547,0.07718947,0.0041785613,0.0016506779,0.010189958,0.022631088,0.005055893,0.20266263],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8564936,0.004870307,0.066296116,0.0010137958,0.00092778384,0.0061336053,0.016990941,0.00094348023,0.0463303],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99599946,0.0019338301,0.00038556303,0.00027515585,0.0011398662,0.00026625564],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9815352,0.00847671,0.0024662097,0.0022329346,0.004523142,0.0007658245],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004725928,0.0005662361,0.00050773623,0.0061994293,0.0021326959,0.0019377292,0.00091266545,0.00066938717,0.0067359805],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019954756,0.00021958836,0.00035216604,0.004108708,0.0005682625,0.0037734285,0.0019290706,0.0007791864,0.0019431111],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00097307813,0.0008142733,0.1179994,0.0024523681,0.0002406994,0.0013287279,0.03799222,0.0006944577,0.01131697,0.009017629,0.1158739,0.7012962],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001963806,0.0017444637,0.38076115,0.0023839376,0.0003211405,0.0029791947,0.05946314,0.013251004,0.016437339,0.009965358,0.5118954,0.0006015261],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0059177973,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0101553835,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99933064,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00077666587,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012364491,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02499342},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2169700202","doi":"10.1177/0956797611435980","title":"Do Economic Equality and Generalized Trust Inhibit Academic Dishonesty? Evidence From State-Level Search-Engine Queries","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Psychological Science","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":86,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Cheating; Honesty; Academic dishonesty; Inequality; Dishonesty; Psychology; Economic inequality; Social psychology; Socioeconomic status; State (computer science); Trustworthiness; Honor; Sociology; Computer science; Internet privacy; Mathematics; Demography","score_opus":0.20325304528725036,"score_gpt":0.4433156761202422,"score_spread":0.24006263083299184,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2169700202","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99657613,0.00017794136,0.00018516177,0.0003871985,0.0000034408552,0.00000880156,0.0002760484,0.000004090089,0.0023811662],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996679,0.000052829968,0.000035228444,0.000028086697,0.000004514636,0.000003163598,0.00011513206,0.0000024443636,0.00009069152],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9946854,0.0024227914,0.0006478592,0.0005826972,0.0009252067,0.0007359323],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.79883105,0.10147302,0.07577384,0.011968668,0.0063519906,0.0056014173],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004350205,0.00019907225,0.00060980604,0.0014970339,0.00088841934,0.0025884975,0.0006704068,0.0008578803,0.005467661],"category_scores_gemma":[0.075227626,0.00035649535,0.00063518365,0.0029250318,0.0018944128,0.0035290886,0.0023638569,0.0014004303,0.0005017292],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003910286,0.0001526533,0.991222,0.00005868243,0.000113284346,0.00007531741,0.0019594082,0.0001208102,0.00018828498,0.00035774792,0.00016068648,0.0052000987],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008420311,0.00004931507,0.9976114,0.00002213142,0.00004090586,0.000043069438,0.0011322023,0.00036176995,0.00016053091,0.00030277699,0.00025926184,0.000008264042],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016970277,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012919494,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9991421,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00063103624,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006872323,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.033743024},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2177391838","doi":"10.55016/ojs/ajer.v59i3.55730","title":"University Students’ and Instructors’ Paraphrasing and Citation Knowledge and Practices","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Journal of Educational Research","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Psychology; Mathematics education; Higher education; Educational research; Pedagogy; Citation analysis; Knowledge level; Library science; Computer science; Political science","score_opus":0.11817023979814917,"score_gpt":0.4766844912654853,"score_spread":0.3585142514673361,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2177391838","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99391586,0.00032077747,0.00030358267,0.0003083525,0.0000078611965,0.000016471844,0.000026711135,0.000017695065,0.0050827125],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974668,0.00022557886,0.0002967413,0.000065068205,0.000007518491,0.000016098862,0.00002087789,0.000006179496,0.0018951657],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99303293,0.0027710528,0.0007722179,0.000450251,0.0024779127,0.0004956932],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9396996,0.025171489,0.013614242,0.0031058798,0.014409048,0.0039998055],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008081164,0.00016140383,0.0003426013,0.002794297,0.0025066135,0.004219463,0.0007943227,0.0009892343,0.0042117825],"category_scores_gemma":[0.060094185,0.00021960239,0.00021612884,0.0021284593,0.0014603136,0.0022762094,0.0027015398,0.0009552631,0.00093558274],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016927111,0.0004353529,0.33863452,0.00026821712,0.000032137163,0.0004422395,0.47310582,0.00014203603,0.0032939164,0.001161239,0.001981107,0.18033412],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022249897,0.0008935624,0.60331666,0.00040245987,0.000042942233,0.0012869238,0.36552414,0.00068611844,0.005243335,0.0013493251,0.021096803,0.00013541587],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027221218,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0041151964,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99901074,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013923814,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015497243,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.042737782},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2185708658","doi":"10.1002/j.0022-0337.2007.71.8.tb04369.x","title":"Faculty and Student Perceptions of Academic Integrity at U.S. and Canadian Dental Schools","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Dental Education","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":58,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cheating; Academic integrity; Medical education; Dental education; Psychology; Academic dishonesty; Perception; Higher education; Medicine; Political science; Social psychology","score_opus":0.024584976285897467,"score_gpt":0.3890338217338619,"score_spread":0.36444884544796446,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2185708658","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99463177,0.0001868801,0.000025733307,0.0010498428,0.000012303132,0.000014911059,0.00005374587,0.000005344367,0.004019514],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99881494,0.00016223376,0.00003271939,0.00015371853,0.000006163477,0.000004829268,0.000026306467,0.0000016614802,0.00079744204],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9903652,0.0016783999,0.0004530124,0.0003314327,0.004867842,0.002304071],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.963955,0.0044334163,0.0074240225,0.0005097388,0.011242626,0.012435299],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005995875,0.00022132965,0.00045091764,0.0026402373,0.009196648,0.0051293056,0.0010487825,0.0010882802,0.004524225],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02742142,0.00030809094,0.00044612822,0.0032296404,0.0047781644,0.0012304637,0.0027174049,0.0016678197,0.00036541803],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018785431,0.00033828567,0.7844217,0.000107236934,0.000037170706,0.00027813806,0.1788178,0.0001377111,0.00069360464,0.0011315773,0.004179765,0.029669177],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001182458,0.00021802486,0.74138504,0.00009157292,0.00002001975,0.00012279827,0.2501956,0.00014899373,0.0003552395,0.00017281844,0.007229562,0.000048499038],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.73709095,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8326597,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99891174,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.024748921,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.036826774,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5289147},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2187247433","doi":"10.1002/j.0022-0337.2011.75.10.tb05185.x","title":"Penalties for Academic Dishonesty in a Greek Dental School Environment","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Dental Education","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Wilcoxon signed-rank test; Academic dishonesty; Test (biology); Cheating; Medical education; Rank (graph theory); Significant difference; Social psychology; Medicine; Pedagogy; Mathematics","score_opus":0.0353695298267682,"score_gpt":0.32868106957177284,"score_spread":0.2933115397450046,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2187247433","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9968953,0.00014845296,0.000060011032,0.00034878915,0.0000098592045,0.0000075523612,0.000008113674,0.0000027902809,0.0025191843],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99932635,0.00012031388,0.00007440086,0.00008579115,0.000010520071,0.0000024072426,0.0000055455275,0.0000013178819,0.00037341824],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9909519,0.0045698364,0.0006411044,0.00030026634,0.0025551643,0.0009817269],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98548675,0.0032395767,0.008003972,0.0004468525,0.0011085456,0.0017143687],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035944683,0.00021423616,0.00033005266,0.0016376013,0.0024257516,0.0023226398,0.00046670967,0.0008411595,0.0024187071],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013103143,0.00018521231,0.00023374683,0.0010704069,0.0030076883,0.0007935571,0.0030927644,0.0010122379,0.0003866717],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00048325307,0.0005961264,0.7789543,0.0002502581,0.000051882704,0.004638152,0.116391756,0.00087547064,0.005822941,0.003790781,0.0024932812,0.08565176],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001984765,0.00062452065,0.74482846,0.00020918452,0.000022272026,0.0032829551,0.23298784,0.00064496754,0.0015294688,0.0015516931,0.014210432,0.00008828082],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021887815,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004572779,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99915886,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019136382,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019445802,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01900959},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2192395616","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2655615","title":"The Impact of Technology on Academic Dishonesty: Perspectives from Accounting Faculty","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Lakehead University","funders":"","keywords":"Academic dishonesty; Accounting; Political science; Dishonesty; Psychology; Business; Medical education; Medicine; Cheating; Law; Social psychology","score_opus":0.024683054075007194,"score_gpt":0.35646253227346,"score_spread":0.33177947819845277,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2192395616","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5528435,0.007896432,0.0014393821,0.19820605,0.00034371624,0.00002265708,0.00011247007,0.000023823937,0.23911203],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9926927,0.0014853639,0.000075483054,0.003647373,0.00021048416,0.0000042019674,0.0000076070605,0.0000091222855,0.001867616],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9847109,0.007692682,0.0005761245,0.0007125755,0.0033220758,0.0029856698],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.86242616,0.10086321,0.015341833,0.003266767,0.010315575,0.00778652],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014979106,0.0002749924,0.00038338426,0.0044533047,0.01148775,0.023119388,0.0016742718,0.008159378,0.007922943],"category_scores_gemma":[0.051678456,0.00030808948,0.00048482043,0.004793884,0.031724468,0.013465198,0.008569959,0.008384116,0.00056436],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00031324546,0.0004383813,0.079978354,0.0003814226,0.00007924124,0.003997597,0.400976,0.0010501193,0.0010325322,0.4334082,0.018893823,0.0594511],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006537935,0.00031109626,0.06806321,0.001193105,0.0000911474,0.0017092332,0.67661023,0.0010212075,0.00234404,0.119082786,0.12931786,0.0001908018],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011824744,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0126355225,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9918406,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0080889305,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008181833,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07921803},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2202041708","doi":"10.1016/j.ajog.2015.09.004","title":"Self-plagiarism: a misnomer","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Misnomer; Scientific misconduct; Misconduct; Context (archaeology); Medicine; Engineering ethics; Law; Alternative medicine; Political science","score_opus":0.021200208843817746,"score_gpt":0.29022656691363424,"score_spread":0.2690263580698165,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2202041708","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"reporting","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":"reporting","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04536075,0.02529785,0.044302776,0.80337465,0.021349711,0.0001647011,0.00008492336,0.0004024079,0.05966225],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7944596,0.0086196065,0.014760071,0.15035434,0.016529016,0.00023199967,0.000049581107,0.00048336515,0.014512547],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.8121576,0.13690196,0.0073955674,0.007897801,0.03350996,0.0021373034],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.61289376,0.2954764,0.031461578,0.021186782,0.035384938,0.0035966167],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0686933,0.0009869895,0.0009296705,0.0052474043,0.011834609,0.013647468,0.0025636896,0.01231884,0.0038185713],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2230886,0.0006960648,0.0009789771,0.0034720434,0.06781825,0.026438452,0.0105816405,0.019032925,0.0015717519],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009148818,0.00004729076,0.004648491,0.001051597,0.00006253892,0.00226378,0.30255553,0.00020333867,0.0016246747,0.5275787,0.1050907,0.054781836],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003193495,0.0001235114,0.0019963598,0.0028696223,0.000052706182,0.0071582245,0.11576637,0.0011269123,0.003735002,0.21494026,0.6519516,0.0002475172],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011313575,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009880518,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98768115,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0074690236,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0062652337,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36328924},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W220455632","doi":"","title":"A War of Words: Software Programs Developed to Combat the Scourge of Student Plagiarism Have Found Opposition from the Very Circle of Educators They're Meant to Help","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"T.H.E. Journal Technological Horizons in Education","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Opposition (politics); Encyclopedia; Class (philosophy); Mathematics education; Sociology; Media studies; Computer science; Law; Psychology; Library science; Political science; Artificial intelligence; Politics","score_opus":0.03791374135467607,"score_gpt":0.3556434345414609,"score_spread":0.31772969318678485,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W220455632","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.084089324,0.012381851,0.1320245,0.3327976,0.020581264,0.0007220492,0.0008094581,0.08471939,0.33187458],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.26852074,0.005834491,0.07296458,0.10776923,0.007030746,0.00075305626,0.0012474167,0.029063608,0.50681615],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9927638,0.0022513007,0.00037458327,0.0006275249,0.0035056467,0.00047709263],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9717871,0.011034521,0.0030038508,0.004327472,0.005796798,0.004050203],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006476032,0.0011619256,0.00046992156,0.0024097634,0.008145963,0.010858174,0.0017349784,0.0047479863,0.031192861],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04976942,0.00082488486,0.00055740384,0.001750216,0.0065216343,0.015006901,0.007046202,0.005973027,0.029146034],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009319846,0.00011045964,0.0016820874,0.0002289803,0.000031583237,0.0004614895,0.019295344,0.000063998064,0.0046272697,0.008341192,0.75445426,0.21061012],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004027873,0.00014020005,0.0020221788,0.00023171605,0.000027233558,0.0012078516,0.009476401,0.0003832858,0.0034225269,0.0068289065,0.97616005,0.000059267644],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002256898,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0046564555,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.995252,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017908128,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026341295,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10435057},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["research_integrity"],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"commentary","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["research_integrity"],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"commentary","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W2238286065","doi":"10.47678/cjhe.v45i4.184771","title":"Special Consideration in Post-Secondary Institutions: Trends at a Canadian University","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Higher Education","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University; Baycrest Hospital; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Aside; Point (geometry); Population; Psychology; Work (physics); Higher education; Special populations; Actuarial science; Demographic economics; Medical education; Demography; Sociology; Political science; Medicine; Law; Economics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.0438141151157772,"score_gpt":0.30124166471347746,"score_spread":0.25742754959770026,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2238286065","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98081195,0.0018447582,0.00023445016,0.0037661179,0.00003959906,0.00008790598,0.005797595,0.0001010326,0.0073166457],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99386877,0.0014675901,0.00032729158,0.0003810974,0.00002605123,0.000025984904,0.0014773384,0.000023033735,0.0024029096],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9919904,0.00041071605,0.00067107176,0.00081768044,0.004001352,0.002108688],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.951738,0.002853507,0.015336127,0.0011789608,0.01879068,0.010102744],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026536451,0.0003649286,0.0005409229,0.010486597,0.0040166425,0.0028695683,0.002815712,0.0011582226,0.0034321735],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017692547,0.00043300632,0.0006213378,0.016435938,0.0018818304,0.0011466137,0.0022000605,0.0015489027,0.00050728733],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009910745,0.000058601454,0.9646162,0.00014455228,0.00003125294,0.0002720094,0.0065000122,0.00014760741,0.0007068763,0.00058111903,0.003529016,0.0233137],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000018625551,0.000020617403,0.9930419,0.000032022515,0.0000060773827,0.000112343216,0.002779282,0.00013256924,0.00013213768,0.000021948597,0.003696943,0.000022299128],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9772471,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9859518,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99884176,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.044699132,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.054595277,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32431644},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2248931770","doi":"10.7202/1029487ar","title":"Travailler ensemble pour mieux (in)former : le partenariat bibliothécaire-professeur dans la promotion de l’intégrité intellectuelle","year":2015,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Documentation et bibliothèques","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Art; Grit; Political science; Sociology; Psychology","score_opus":0.04857520842894547,"score_gpt":0.3462798952853438,"score_spread":0.29770468685639834,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2248931770","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10518732,0.022115177,0.0052357554,0.30714536,0.007886304,0.00018340805,0.0004389232,0.00055733445,0.5512505],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5114126,0.01001589,0.003754478,0.017351499,0.004117308,0.00013957414,0.00043315624,0.0003463763,0.45242915],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98991454,0.003994102,0.000750879,0.00085737335,0.0028471726,0.001635924],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96329755,0.0054767085,0.0044102357,0.00330686,0.010795192,0.012713519],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0105773825,0.00033284727,0.0006948453,0.003495879,0.014442061,0.016880993,0.0012768316,0.002736851,0.06062412],"category_scores_gemma":[0.039868608,0.0002583907,0.00037299434,0.003980793,0.00517554,0.013305365,0.010219048,0.004656794,0.012171914],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013840986,0.00020153154,0.028326217,0.00050210085,0.000044464476,0.001103857,0.11211245,0.00015888893,0.0010578962,0.28091627,0.29725143,0.2781865],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009516041,0.000054877673,0.0150613785,0.00041830834,0.000015222392,0.00047253878,0.029914558,0.00012752008,0.00044972124,0.011011007,0.94242895,0.00003643119],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019944254,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.036301013,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99726313,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008464075,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019590745,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2028079},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2249635392","doi":"","title":"The Business of Online Plagiarism in Post-Secondary Education","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"EdMedia: World Conference on Educational Media and Technology","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Internet privacy; Public relations; Business; Computer science; Political science","score_opus":0.016751745674792762,"score_gpt":0.28552963885706417,"score_spread":0.2687778931822714,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2249635392","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.33367398,0.010037247,0.003233516,0.13121147,0.0011737098,0.00009336771,0.00034766982,0.00047171756,0.5197574],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9621823,0.0014245532,0.00037630842,0.0022926228,0.0006596424,0.000016771339,0.000056642795,0.0000753118,0.032915838],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9879689,0.005295786,0.00054324704,0.0006491667,0.0042076637,0.0013352106],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8701197,0.06784816,0.020309187,0.010341088,0.015455093,0.015926767],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011912894,0.00025280952,0.00040478757,0.004908747,0.011673997,0.01947464,0.0011193575,0.004677991,0.027965985],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0847311,0.00028475947,0.0003324423,0.004601329,0.0075440668,0.014639325,0.005322018,0.005477113,0.0076920683],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006119283,0.00087744254,0.105883844,0.00063993543,0.00007189531,0.0014972733,0.0578931,0.00052563346,0.001418638,0.200512,0.14672953,0.48333874],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011502162,0.00068694045,0.15152666,0.002799558,0.000117261145,0.0038617693,0.11904063,0.0034510158,0.0070698676,0.11170385,0.5994463,0.00018116402],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029270672,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0051802997,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.995322,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004531186,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006319824,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09355557},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["research_integrity"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["research_integrity"],"domain":null,"study_design":"design_other","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2266484090","doi":"10.4000/questionsdecommunication.9818","title":"Penser le plagiat à la lumière du cadre normatif du régime contemporain des savoirs scientifiques","year":2015,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Questions de communication","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.04903521828715269,"score_gpt":0.30594330961122934,"score_spread":0.25690809132407666,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2266484090","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12578455,0.0127270315,0.02821236,0.10994867,0.0015644345,0.00006339713,0.00013352718,0.00016564688,0.72140044],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9630859,0.0021946616,0.002193397,0.003376338,0.0006788939,0.00008955867,0.000038195118,0.00008880301,0.028254341],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9785705,0.01243417,0.0007688464,0.0023762053,0.004555278,0.0012949653],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9647253,0.018638201,0.0048564747,0.0048583965,0.0055530155,0.001368591],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013808846,0.00043302056,0.0006573435,0.0029867184,0.0103825405,0.015434222,0.0013684989,0.0055563473,0.0074029234],"category_scores_gemma":[0.038440574,0.00032761772,0.00048778276,0.002951034,0.046193242,0.011531395,0.005440991,0.0074782413,0.0013850848],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019707657,0.000007762383,0.0007214559,0.000060462007,0.0000073294755,0.000059178168,0.024997098,0.00008169345,0.0002052657,0.96526486,0.002239053,0.0063361926],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002837346,0.00006998171,0.00546055,0.0008001874,0.000029638251,0.00038824798,0.026500756,0.000623331,0.001251616,0.59764594,0.3671187,0.0000827676],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005736675,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0048936326,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99444366,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009540866,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008316074,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07302904},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2268329921","doi":"10.15388/infedu.2014.10","title":"Collaboration, Collusion and Plagiarism in Computer Science Coursework","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informatics in Education","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":97,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"University of Waterloo","keywords":"Coursework; Collusion; Context (archaeology); Academic dishonesty; Computer science; Mathematics education; Engineering ethics; Cheating; Psychology; Engineering","score_opus":0.006463584133639145,"score_gpt":0.3096939182671761,"score_spread":0.303230334133537,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2268329921","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9073362,0.004914196,0.045503955,0.006375437,0.00011823751,0.00020752971,0.000071746625,0.00026070976,0.03521195],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9923109,0.00067439745,0.0051569906,0.00017545125,0.000103430284,0.000073694035,0.00003172057,0.000041970303,0.0014316308],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.92854106,0.039492242,0.004785995,0.0032400934,0.02099875,0.0029418292],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6489664,0.23215799,0.07145359,0.019330056,0.018226061,0.009865956],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.031178882,0.00045040378,0.00070998666,0.0069542923,0.0069778534,0.009219518,0.0018118256,0.0021760042,0.0025115137],"category_scores_gemma":[0.18327005,0.0005465231,0.00054797396,0.004902048,0.0091234725,0.008879597,0.010957159,0.0030607386,0.0004226259],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000532846,0.0004631782,0.3561354,0.0011368351,0.00018370192,0.0012538492,0.31403938,0.0042126793,0.004387476,0.04903584,0.0033498215,0.26526898],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013731807,0.0012891975,0.54808694,0.0031887288,0.00024933834,0.0064089024,0.20219484,0.019046132,0.010977151,0.1351619,0.07273193,0.0005276782],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028762892,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029502613,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.997824,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0049049775,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038188454,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16489166},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["research_integrity"],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["research_integrity"],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"commentary","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W2272209815","doi":"10.1186/s12916-016-0561-2","title":"A scoping review of competencies for scientific editors of biomedical journals","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"BMC Medicine","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; University of Ottawa; Ottawa Hospital","funders":"","keywords":"CINAHL; PsycINFO; MEDLINE; Publishing; Medicine; Cochrane Library; Grey literature; Medical education; Core competency; Systematic review; Scientific literature; Alternative medicine; Psychological intervention; Nursing; Political science","score_opus":0.20008531600799637,"score_gpt":0.4793850934411732,"score_spread":0.2792997774331768,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2272209815","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009087286,0.95868313,0.004329135,0.0075909123,0.0014722913,0.009345445,0.0015232983,0.00006521043,0.00790322],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.047912408,0.91793555,0.015009463,0.002992881,0.00042611593,0.01330621,0.0017421554,0.000031393804,0.00064376753],"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","domain_scores_codex":[0.9001825,0.039177816,0.040432926,0.0029958999,0.015824713,0.0013861033],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6145681,0.28285375,0.04564109,0.0060615838,0.047714718,0.0031606255],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.09746618,0.0018663664,0.0038710472,0.041026663,0.0029349881,0.006231321,0.003203395,0.0047659217,0.0039714943],"category_scores_gemma":[0.34706092,0.0015963757,0.0055256556,0.027559847,0.003063788,0.008821126,0.004777668,0.0027653067,0.0009507803],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":"systematic_review","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017180825,0.00007857729,0.0030030948,0.81036067,0.0012883383,0.00028577444,0.0037728865,0.00018066789,0.00033338089,0.0021190192,0.006335457,0.17207037],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004383898,0.00009960625,0.0038460603,0.96050763,0.0026655346,0.00036846113,0.0025087679,0.000088638706,0.00026917504,0.00069102214,0.02887702,0.000034201927],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005125708,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014521726,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9025338,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010442119,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.054959808,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.51545656},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2273774827","doi":"10.11575/prism/24891","title":"An Exploration of Faculty Attitudes Toward Student Academic Dishonesty in Selected Canadian Universities","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"PRISM (University of Calgary)","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Academic dishonesty; Pedagogy; Academic integrity; Medical education; Dishonesty; Psychology; Cheating; Political science; Mathematics education; Engineering ethics; Engineering; Medicine; Social psychology","score_opus":0.031730927770727856,"score_gpt":0.305028180829876,"score_spread":0.27329725305914815,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2273774827","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9926012,0.00029865355,0.00014475783,0.0012182178,0.000014844814,0.0000779888,0.00013810318,0.0000066047146,0.0054997816],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969614,0.0006752445,0.00020372348,0.0003156839,0.000005802888,0.00003247812,0.000064771375,0.0000054278457,0.0017354388],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99080056,0.0020840187,0.0004017733,0.00047129442,0.003755411,0.0024868879],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97254115,0.007967674,0.0034423189,0.0004847661,0.011309148,0.00425484],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009469602,0.00033779294,0.0005133127,0.0054246094,0.024164785,0.0054810494,0.0019654843,0.00087319757,0.002460905],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021877017,0.0004334108,0.0003235796,0.009564534,0.0078032454,0.0018324029,0.0034033614,0.0015878328,0.00014216686],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000075491494,0.00008275304,0.1503814,0.0002497815,0.000016231108,0.00042619984,0.82273674,0.000101062724,0.001723572,0.001915229,0.0013318638,0.020959575],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000024917156,0.000043776134,0.096940756,0.000102325845,0.00000727676,0.000052354815,0.8955937,0.000079287696,0.00045460783,0.00010173278,0.0065902043,0.00003144123],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9649241,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98230433,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9991268,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09062863,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13408725,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6575598},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2282511349","doi":"10.5539/ies.v9n3p197","title":"The Undesirable Behaviors of Students in Academic Classrooms, and the Discipline Strategies Used by Faculty Members to Control Such Behaviors from the Perspective of the College of Education Students in King Saud University","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Education Studies","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cheating; Discipline; Psychology; Notice; Perspective (graphical); Class (philosophy); Mathematics education; Sample (material); Control (management); Embarrassment; Medical education; Pedagogy; Sociology; Social psychology; Medicine; Management","score_opus":0.03966707690352694,"score_gpt":0.42308075446117177,"score_spread":0.3834136775576448,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2282511349","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97846884,0.0006350398,0.00029443568,0.0063790055,0.000055894827,0.00002180385,0.000024680978,0.000008935405,0.014111431],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9955473,0.00058670546,0.00025678618,0.0006067386,0.000014594327,0.000013111334,0.000022153532,0.000004531506,0.0029480802],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99607533,0.0020371845,0.00023587947,0.00020147173,0.0008947304,0.00055549666],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99243623,0.001301104,0.0027245288,0.00047160021,0.0015824146,0.0014841696],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021606537,0.0002230439,0.00018896026,0.000701288,0.005299607,0.0048460695,0.0005914569,0.00063499575,0.002839986],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008180648,0.00013100682,0.00022491762,0.0006016157,0.002391847,0.0014622464,0.0017301769,0.0013622066,0.0005229678],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007162026,0.0008000901,0.5447851,0.00024989658,0.0000310199,0.00077244395,0.34429002,0.00010651917,0.003974747,0.0059929667,0.0070244484,0.09190106],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006845459,0.0002192958,0.3941688,0.0002131103,0.000027665661,0.0008099384,0.57046515,0.00016331188,0.0022457838,0.0009083042,0.030728461,0.00004339356],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009319187,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017819848,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99936503,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024933123,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005483215,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.018529892},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2286200027","doi":"","title":"The Misuse of Prescription Drugs by Post-Secondary Students in British Columbia","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Medical prescription; Medicine; Psychology; Nursing","score_opus":0.0107567795686197,"score_gpt":0.2756116301779062,"score_spread":0.2648548506092865,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2286200027","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99439466,0.00031325108,0.0000142337285,0.0010851054,0.00001182893,0.000011345554,0.0001649935,0.000003444395,0.0040010954],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963612,0.0004489339,0.000025453051,0.00024385474,0.0000054150723,0.000004072577,0.000057598776,0.0000032626915,0.0028501514],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99840206,0.00026633902,0.00014082826,0.00010352432,0.0006313052,0.0004559512],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98763615,0.0019207738,0.0026516386,0.0002404481,0.0046983873,0.002852688],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009994946,0.00015255391,0.00040699754,0.0026309444,0.0080969045,0.0027684395,0.0010224612,0.0011654105,0.004509476],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008711179,0.00032010017,0.00016784132,0.0040077535,0.0017566526,0.0007139365,0.0017640642,0.0019515156,0.0006067051],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015362843,0.000175244,0.91581637,0.00012552175,0.00002245079,0.001158991,0.056163635,0.000048136197,0.00071044854,0.00043187977,0.0029677695,0.022225926],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000062965105,0.000048158312,0.9233599,0.00012345234,0.000012734667,0.0003584559,0.070277296,0.0001477434,0.00028641705,0.000068916925,0.0052920803,0.000018565728],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9323921,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9674586,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06760788,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015322764,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02722029,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13601202},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2288244535","doi":"10.5539/ies.v9n2p81","title":"English Learning Achievement and EFL Learners’ Cheating Attitudes and Cheating Behaviors","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Education Studies","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cheating; Psychology; Academic dishonesty; Mathematics education; Academic achievement; Language proficiency; English as a foreign language; Social psychology","score_opus":0.045472374564198365,"score_gpt":0.399478912853852,"score_spread":0.35400653828965367,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2288244535","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99956316,0.0000140872335,0.00001251398,0.000012695298,0.0000010111341,0.0000020120124,0.000013557061,7.151563e-7,0.00038019102],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99949133,0.000014852638,0.000019778367,0.0000069602493,0.0000019622646,0.0000027260314,0.00002497627,7.11995e-7,0.00043663578],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995962,0.00008760738,0.00004465842,0.000058716552,0.00012738306,0.00008542964],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99611074,0.0010736615,0.0015255484,0.0001791828,0.00041310614,0.0006977419],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00088876777,0.00020723438,0.00026194396,0.00067641115,0.00058613566,0.0009108733,0.00020235949,0.0003501599,0.0039316313],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0034848994,0.00011961511,0.00023732416,0.0003603806,0.00045998264,0.00040482904,0.0005146641,0.0005993796,0.00059533585],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006504219,0.00033732617,0.99416625,0.000010585109,0.0000134820875,0.00006264592,0.0012355316,0.000018816389,0.00050395605,0.000036441823,0.00006554701,0.0034843176],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002059358,0.00014071957,0.9982987,0.000004353512,0.000006658208,0.00004761133,0.0010655546,0.0001137099,0.00017689553,0.000022353832,0.00011865834,0.0000027271499],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024987687,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003169133,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9996498,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027982413,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024262577,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.013152659},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2296000433","doi":"10.5539/elt.v9n4p106","title":"A Comparison of the Act and Frequency of Plagiarism between Technical and Non-Technical Programme Undergraduates","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"English Language Teaching","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Medical education; Significant difference; Higher education; Political science; Medicine","score_opus":0.021285830985265364,"score_gpt":0.330632088724398,"score_spread":0.3093462577391326,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2296000433","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99862933,0.00013135598,0.00008321473,0.000022017915,0.0000036810018,0.000010049436,0.00004454444,0.000004096824,0.0010717988],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99904794,0.00012224489,0.000095958625,0.000009960828,0.000008140574,0.000008069864,0.00008035478,0.0000020472264,0.0006254028],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978243,0.0005320001,0.00029825798,0.00016443951,0.0009480101,0.00023307039],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98326206,0.0045714374,0.0071938075,0.0006572024,0.0024668768,0.0018486233],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017701968,0.00015478137,0.0002454076,0.0042282213,0.00034060612,0.0008963981,0.00034678745,0.0003802465,0.0020812787],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015713772,0.00012768793,0.00019508322,0.0015006235,0.0006850293,0.0007205911,0.0010233071,0.0003616583,0.0004828909],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019038594,0.00015570266,0.9583732,0.0001257134,0.000035735975,0.00017509895,0.010607751,0.000047925758,0.0021576989,0.0001562441,0.00021854123,0.027756017],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000015247061,0.00013851782,0.9954371,0.000016953527,0.000004689667,0.0002983918,0.0033839673,0.000045387394,0.00019640675,0.000036267516,0.00043438424,0.0000062717713],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00090053416,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012517334,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9996198,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00034958305,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003571718,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0093618035},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["research_integrity"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"domain":"methods","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2302500441","doi":"","title":"China’s Lax Law Harbors Academic Misconduct","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"La Cité Collégiale","funders":"","keywords":"Misconduct; China; Corporate governance; Law; Politics; Political science; Work (physics); Academic integrity; Criminology; Sociology; Management; Engineering ethics; Engineering; Economics","score_opus":0.01183053135158502,"score_gpt":0.2981991072424403,"score_spread":0.2863685758908553,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2302500441","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7271013,0.0024416095,0.0040109255,0.086795166,0.0007498053,0.0001452598,0.00045543438,0.00038505433,0.17791536],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98151577,0.000527688,0.0004893639,0.006750566,0.00025562264,0.000027945835,0.00011854172,0.000014694685,0.010299624],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9942199,0.00068029045,0.00037421862,0.00061922864,0.0025363145,0.0015700775],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98148936,0.004935176,0.0039274436,0.0024221984,0.004163587,0.0030622685],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0074922303,0.00027588394,0.00063774164,0.0024154787,0.010089068,0.007429019,0.0009966851,0.0032661716,0.0059540174],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014072629,0.000305307,0.0003905804,0.002962088,0.008978557,0.0029228607,0.0038060287,0.0037205492,0.00074973394],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023588992,0.00014468322,0.22890371,0.00046008851,0.0001630339,0.004247007,0.025931975,0.0011849396,0.0065752966,0.5422787,0.0730282,0.1168465],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017750819,0.0003860996,0.3306455,0.0005877247,0.00031858037,0.0017129962,0.013695356,0.00594665,0.006995132,0.19126692,0.4478875,0.0003799687],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.049360696,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05100505,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99673384,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0080660265,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.029371077,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09814674},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2316012485","doi":"10.1097/bpb.0b013e32834410e9","title":"Skeptical thinking series","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics B","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"British Columbia Children's Hospital","funders":"","keywords":"Skepticism; Honesty; Falsifiability; Medicine; Epistemology; Series (stratigraphy); Logical reasoning; Component (thermodynamics); Psychology; Social psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03660260032883447,"score_gpt":0.28392087625868334,"score_spread":0.24731827592984887,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2316012485","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.44487068,0.002729878,0.07870596,0.014835065,0.0018652094,0.00076353445,0.00022301787,0.0005233082,0.45548338],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96571577,0.00068962533,0.012657229,0.001350038,0.00048765723,0.00026898467,0.00008342155,0.00007045705,0.018676732],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.96413255,0.013969404,0.0017673098,0.0017443129,0.017164692,0.0012217537],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.75480103,0.16274808,0.030992601,0.017776934,0.02941444,0.004266989],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.028461454,0.00081620394,0.0005914665,0.004949721,0.0036396075,0.006458005,0.0018693338,0.0020025754,0.013005498],"category_scores_gemma":[0.14492401,0.00030515104,0.00080872985,0.0015719361,0.00945903,0.0064506596,0.0037611858,0.005839028,0.0018432224],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0014971422,0.0009813317,0.054588903,0.0011678791,0.00021577916,0.0023599032,0.04900229,0.0021401697,0.00665047,0.5142282,0.023165755,0.34400216],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021117977,0.0023893898,0.07440586,0.002865081,0.00032316585,0.010366473,0.039447818,0.012204792,0.026323067,0.65229195,0.17875879,0.00041252657],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00034982205,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00034242432,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9979974,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036006405,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035332595,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15052038},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2333077217","doi":"10.1111/j.1911-3838.2011.00017.x","title":"A Case of Academic Misconduct: Does Self‐Interest Rule?*","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Accounting Perspectives","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Misconduct; Rationalization (economics); Academic integrity; Context (archaeology); Scientific misconduct; Public relations; Psychology; Accounting; Political science; Social psychology; Business; Law; Medicine","score_opus":0.05995498405032347,"score_gpt":0.32752630628709145,"score_spread":0.267571322236768,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2333077217","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.631995,0.0021721472,0.017769918,0.19797468,0.0011609911,0.00015444522,0.000054554366,0.00017332661,0.14854494],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9868535,0.00041510328,0.0015190286,0.005971762,0.00036893762,0.000034306468,0.000009966322,0.000018316648,0.004809048],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9762131,0.013241305,0.0012407177,0.001965058,0.0038805373,0.003459393],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9580498,0.025615856,0.006680137,0.004290932,0.0034217662,0.0019414849],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016242398,0.00047687578,0.00071167445,0.0024627328,0.01861292,0.0069971695,0.0028148913,0.014302026,0.003014505],"category_scores_gemma":[0.055753283,0.0005777048,0.0010220585,0.0014861929,0.017364914,0.0073761665,0.006076419,0.016804041,0.0005972173],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015830636,0.000410644,0.039926257,0.00015579586,0.000084370404,0.18096606,0.16766383,0.0011454743,0.0009825159,0.5501026,0.02340721,0.034996983],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006987097,0.0003375443,0.013734982,0.0010938428,0.00013545938,0.19628717,0.18627505,0.011210615,0.0062500816,0.3600607,0.22421163,0.00033304785],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004684863,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0052335067,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.985698,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0054556024,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035686453,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.085899055},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2342525931","doi":"10.47678/cjhe.v46i1.185166","title":"Early Contributions to the Evolution of the Canadian Scientific Integrity System: Institutional and Governmental Interaction in the Policy Diffusion Process","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Higher Education","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Carleton University; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Research integrity; Misconduct; Scientific misconduct; Government (linguistics); Consistency (knowledge bases); Process (computing); Political science; Rigour; Public administration; Public relations; Business; Law","score_opus":0.012880303823831185,"score_gpt":0.31048412350728966,"score_spread":0.29760381968345845,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2342525931","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.43610382,0.00891011,0.014592578,0.25354478,0.00073939544,0.000858054,0.0006512093,0.00030551036,0.28429443],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9843113,0.00141561,0.0036774934,0.0036664747,0.00006935163,0.000078512196,0.00007257218,0.00006243929,0.006646303],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.92385,0.023705043,0.0032977075,0.0055934833,0.029609587,0.0139441565],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7886606,0.078989685,0.019615185,0.011380205,0.08055507,0.020799281],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.09536051,0.00052558735,0.0007639548,0.008552919,0.032741405,0.022314932,0.0043406095,0.005261419,0.0038217905],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1855259,0.0011440172,0.0008033545,0.011152703,0.034620233,0.0059625464,0.010042593,0.009284451,0.0002815945],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024394854,0.0001675936,0.13486041,0.0007464387,0.00021015512,0.0007465241,0.15554069,0.004373719,0.0019187407,0.5386808,0.024274252,0.13823678],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000998583,0.00016646327,0.3243784,0.001406121,0.0002145201,0.0003090141,0.11293351,0.0064534885,0.003201165,0.06436245,0.48562974,0.0008452131],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9772858,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9796165,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9947386,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.36285725,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.45179442,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7389953},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2360740284","doi":"","title":"Analysis of PhD Graduates' Attitude towards Scientific Misconduct and Its Causes","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Zhongguo ruankexue","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scientific misconduct; Misconduct; Quarter (Canadian coin); Psychology; Public relations; Medical education; Social psychology; Political science; Law; Medicine; Alternative medicine","score_opus":0.10325744944125981,"score_gpt":0.3340431155624568,"score_spread":0.230785666121197,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2360740284","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99849415,0.000055152064,0.00013211153,0.00022934817,0.0000026019798,0.000008878159,0.000024334684,0.0000012847818,0.0010520879],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993981,0.00008654101,0.00005461707,0.000043261734,0.000005988203,0.000006076584,0.000024381327,4.908423e-7,0.0003805561],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973998,0.0010881951,0.00023224409,0.0001659389,0.00088553637,0.00022828527],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97907627,0.008741915,0.0067072506,0.00064503634,0.0030409838,0.0017884967],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039263465,0.00011504894,0.00020861122,0.001573241,0.000913337,0.00067290216,0.00024690686,0.00041442414,0.0020411673],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016402317,0.000096501884,0.00020948645,0.0011250896,0.0007208971,0.00047216646,0.0008386868,0.00069734326,0.00022487687],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039419967,0.000093126204,0.9646891,0.000069296395,0.000021751657,0.00019581328,0.019099876,0.00006136054,0.0007791846,0.00033096416,0.00023389318,0.014386344],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000035193311,0.00019054367,0.96317565,0.000031436633,0.000015031594,0.00025522886,0.033781987,0.00025540468,0.00036088936,0.00024613566,0.0016715237,0.000012546149],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016381954,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016212257,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99958557,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00061929954,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008450123,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.020764768},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2403365002","doi":"","title":"The Internet and Classroom Plagiarism: Detecting the Problem","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Internet Banking and Commerce","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"The Internet; Plagiarism detection; Computer science; World Wide Web; Internet privacy; Multimedia; Information retrieval","score_opus":0.01796480559262315,"score_gpt":0.27190730184140566,"score_spread":0.2539424962487825,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2403365002","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7197832,0.025271028,0.02773552,0.079924285,0.00097309914,0.0003383287,0.00074762513,0.0006431602,0.14458376],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98029435,0.003941708,0.0064662225,0.0013219055,0.0004819925,0.000056717654,0.00017160292,0.0000804965,0.007185034],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.992927,0.0033266845,0.0005227292,0.00053862744,0.0022903206,0.0003946279],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9121285,0.04583707,0.018923415,0.005880859,0.014196809,0.0030332871],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0047071883,0.0003532158,0.0006105336,0.0072819977,0.0021102258,0.004449567,0.00088749075,0.0025450941,0.007830912],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07582974,0.00027918324,0.00021787758,0.0047008214,0.002830766,0.009035863,0.0020466032,0.003282334,0.0024444666],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00045298698,0.00074874377,0.36168408,0.00076704304,0.00007988893,0.0010016733,0.019745244,0.00040086807,0.0019764742,0.03736022,0.040435895,0.53534687],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018867776,0.00078594516,0.66291535,0.0025708145,0.00025526737,0.016018998,0.06565056,0.012581222,0.007986334,0.09074325,0.1400534,0.00025011145],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038908117,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0047741826,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9974549,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018274505,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018202185,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.026197016},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["research_integrity"],"domain":null,"study_design":"design_other","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2418161243","doi":"10.1503/cmaj.109-5171","title":"Scientific misconduct or criminal offence?","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Medical Association Journal","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Commit; Misconduct; Scientific misconduct; Criminal offence; Face (sociological concept); Criminology; Political science; Psychology; Internet privacy; Computer security; Law; Medicine; Criminal law; Computer science; Sociology; Alternative medicine","score_opus":0.06404367788593042,"score_gpt":0.3220001549856951,"score_spread":0.2579564770997647,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2418161243","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00789579,0.02027274,0.0029214479,0.88224816,0.009240406,0.0000309715,0.00011937269,0.000049870214,0.077221215],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.53337294,0.025864659,0.003629726,0.38804,0.023400862,0.00017669746,0.00021567583,0.00018060832,0.02511893],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9731453,0.012712848,0.0020814498,0.0029809722,0.006152455,0.002926943],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9407584,0.032415297,0.0074560693,0.003729288,0.011232655,0.0044082403],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.025664888,0.00048037962,0.0013237011,0.0037809648,0.006564567,0.012879931,0.0023858354,0.016778558,0.010068606],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11344888,0.00036669965,0.00078859687,0.0031515753,0.060181107,0.030424682,0.004638335,0.016499214,0.0025208953],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000077346354,0.0000639426,0.0041295593,0.0002267507,0.000020253037,0.00034056068,0.00654831,0.000057207362,0.000071461414,0.82274663,0.12383541,0.04188258],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003825208,0.00006111004,0.0045658443,0.0022436525,0.000038956943,0.001294253,0.017859662,0.00037753378,0.00021580327,0.7035676,0.26963717,0.000100122015],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0150285335,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013415621,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9914563,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008543717,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01283335,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1357305},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2428532148","doi":"10.1525/jer.2013.8.5.82","title":"Letter to the Editor","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Columbia College","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Political science; Psychology","score_opus":0.6843819998330386,"score_gpt":0.6434455258129742,"score_spread":0.040936474020064395,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2428532148","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00049348944,0.0012532942,0.00009813816,0.912062,0.06989929,0.00003390882,0.000067550754,0.000053227748,0.016039098],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.004622677,0.0007359694,0.00014186939,0.91455853,0.032844864,0.000066986366,0.000022088117,0.00003982088,0.046967186],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99577796,0.0009466869,0.00035132683,0.00058803556,0.0015800362,0.0007558098],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9904711,0.0036240995,0.00058421044,0.00033412682,0.0030632457,0.0019231008],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004423226,0.00068716484,0.0017002999,0.0009511952,0.0053244643,0.005810154,0.0019990858,0.040431503,0.015303012],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04367889,0.0007400919,0.0013471999,0.0007197871,0.0026104716,0.0026162309,0.0015864779,0.028115047,0.0110548865],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025206946,0.000013767947,0.0002060735,0.00002171396,0.000006757727,0.00062024046,0.00006939613,0.000020161191,0.000037868627,0.0012098728,0.9950422,0.0027267311],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000053454765,0.000027959737,0.00094846403,0.00021105548,0.000023371886,0.00085460074,0.0004576065,0.00022679863,0.00018247747,0.0047899503,0.9921801,0.000044235123],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009535051,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015043894,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.984697,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005041832,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010251151,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.051193714},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2442796381","doi":"10.18438/b8j047","title":"Laying the Groundwork for a New Library Service: Scholar-Practitioner &amp; Graduate Student Attitudes Toward Altmetrics and the Curation of Online Profiles","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Evidence Based Library and Information Practice","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Royal Roads University; Vancouver Island University","funders":"","keywords":"Altmetrics; Promotion (chess); Reputation; Value (mathematics); Service (business); Scholarly communication; Medical education; Public relations; Computer science; World Wide Web; Sociology; Medicine; Political science; Publishing; Marketing; Social science; Business","score_opus":0.07097271289741573,"score_gpt":0.35375794124918886,"score_spread":0.2827852283517731,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2442796381","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94647455,0.0006469058,0.0015487534,0.033403642,0.000090791546,0.00011757561,0.000021640366,0.00006684629,0.017629283],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9918058,0.00040822866,0.0013716115,0.0023646697,0.000056616245,0.000035486144,0.00001541944,0.000020729309,0.003921489],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.97174376,0.01846951,0.0011373783,0.00082708005,0.0057696123,0.0020527188],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.91656107,0.03980805,0.011942619,0.0034397105,0.012929964,0.015318667],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03495922,0.0001888585,0.00037277874,0.0024899382,0.0111625,0.0134283565,0.0013454311,0.0030540163,0.008500373],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07813549,0.00046319482,0.0002397312,0.0021368067,0.007939598,0.00965292,0.009459985,0.0029379968,0.0019539448],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008307437,0.00045531764,0.09318299,0.0003151972,0.000012255924,0.0011270483,0.8009287,0.000051694227,0.0019271403,0.005406843,0.007819682,0.088689916],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008798094,0.00024212353,0.017376792,0.00021329703,0.000008395377,0.0005677033,0.9444568,0.00017736162,0.0004488788,0.0017169376,0.03475735,0.000025528663],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0040473007,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0061383597,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9975101,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038536973,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0114088915,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18488419},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2468815196","doi":"10.3138/jsp.47.4.307","title":"An Expanded Approach to Evaluating Open Access Journals","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Publication; Documentation; Quality (philosophy); Computer science; Incentive; Process (computing); Process management; World Wide Web; Knowledge management; Business; Political science; Advertising; Law","score_opus":0.29698328069141705,"score_gpt":0.502177373625365,"score_spread":0.2051940929339479,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2468815196","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09029432,0.003907675,0.47317407,0.021673579,0.002395207,0.013015414,0.0019977875,0.001958662,0.39158323],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.40577415,0.001952263,0.5483446,0.0022016927,0.001411305,0.005628311,0.00075387093,0.00026387817,0.033669867],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.6360725,0.18965735,0.032325335,0.009028797,0.1295886,0.0033273334],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.44953284,0.19139178,0.043145496,0.039185893,0.26650876,0.01023531],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.18114007,0.0017757228,0.0027145285,0.030788196,0.0055560684,0.02805678,0.0060071163,0.0048276526,0.016626045],"category_scores_gemma":[0.37510666,0.0007232571,0.0017085528,0.017482884,0.008103781,0.02094815,0.012260033,0.0050671548,0.0042248657],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010094817,0.0011048678,0.029461497,0.003033492,0.0004126826,0.0011267819,0.029955987,0.004836422,0.007625144,0.31969574,0.017777083,0.5839609],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00042149005,0.0041260147,0.058457583,0.005679853,0.0009615973,0.0031051205,0.023229929,0.0528208,0.019239247,0.4508866,0.3797973,0.0012744003],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004200969,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0052954312,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99399287,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00999269,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016969124,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9579717},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2471565349","doi":"","title":"Can Serious Games Prevent Plagiarism","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Athabasca University","funders":"","keywords":"Internet privacy; Computer security; Business; Computer science","score_opus":0.08313402438246127,"score_gpt":0.32800648036972696,"score_spread":0.2448724559872657,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2471565349","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6059365,0.0048562316,0.074150585,0.03125397,0.0037669924,0.0016925838,0.0011799895,0.0103339,0.26682922],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9714569,0.00059535616,0.0094366,0.0013147789,0.00017434916,0.00020145816,0.0005086956,0.00025447542,0.016057357],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99647826,0.0013352348,0.00023082313,0.00042229707,0.0009742793,0.0005591305],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93398255,0.036444943,0.006099534,0.009421097,0.008951412,0.005100499],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0041363146,0.0008076964,0.0007495707,0.0018497038,0.0020576527,0.004741704,0.0021849785,0.0035111047,0.023020422],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11117126,0.00045541924,0.00053474563,0.0006010163,0.0015174457,0.007665541,0.0031555656,0.0025161912,0.008158305],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0052370997,0.0057644257,0.039555397,0.0019373612,0.00040331754,0.0006333142,0.004804385,0.011562865,0.0059841676,0.06618036,0.127088,0.7308493],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0036885254,0.008868604,0.073372856,0.0029100825,0.0009902454,0.0018417132,0.014129412,0.09111546,0.021907324,0.45774084,0.3229282,0.00050679484],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004189399,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007818456,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99648887,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00092193333,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033296722,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07701099},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["research_integrity"],"domain":null,"study_design":"design_other","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2472685502","doi":"10.64152/10125/66887","title":"Using 'Close Reading' as a course theme in a multilingual disciplinary classroom","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Reading in a Foreign Language","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Course (navigation); Reading (process); Psychology; Discipline; Teaching method; Theme (computing); Linguistics; Extensive reading; Pedagogy; Mathematics education; Computer science; Sociology; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.060863193047040076,"score_gpt":0.3930325461145839,"score_spread":0.3321693530675438,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2472685502","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7430277,0.00036920753,0.18484743,0.0023625237,0.0004595866,0.0014865081,0.00006011536,0.0013510403,0.06603586],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.74395114,0.0003759685,0.22277957,0.0008537094,0.00017187666,0.0018203021,0.00010488189,0.00022615181,0.029716445],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966574,0.0017005965,0.00011174109,0.0006476376,0.0005933432,0.00028931184],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9939626,0.0026857993,0.00047997065,0.00092047994,0.00045750837,0.0014935799],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030534007,0.000594557,0.0006419809,0.0010600716,0.0035253996,0.0037908866,0.002557891,0.0016452239,0.0040230798],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006427521,0.0003802543,0.00055143645,0.0005305414,0.0033420557,0.0028789723,0.0076105106,0.0031864475,0.0016969467],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003770005,0.007172887,0.010668471,0.0011076678,0.000038723985,0.0038526212,0.40813202,0.0011713555,0.06117228,0.023739005,0.0101352725,0.4724326],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006767269,0.009114732,0.041601505,0.0017132952,0.00018059023,0.014754387,0.26821026,0.008463804,0.059430998,0.054099742,0.5413158,0.00043815663],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00033344372,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014202576,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0040230798,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00082869676,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017735022,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01614809},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2474558075","doi":"10.1302/2046-3758.56.bjr-2016-0047","title":"Retractions in orthopaedic research","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Bone and Joint Research","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":67,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Juravinski Cancer Centre; Hamilton Health Sciences; McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Scientific misconduct; Scrutiny; Misconduct; Impact factor; Medicine; Cochrane Library; MEDLINE; Data extraction; Meta-analysis; Alternative medicine; Political science; Pathology; Law","score_opus":0.257422106957606,"score_gpt":0.47710970848641454,"score_spread":0.21968760152880856,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2474558075","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018332627,0.83781046,0.010384686,0.059986714,0.034913927,0.002700387,0.003263873,0.00039575205,0.032211516],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.20232128,0.67024875,0.033121943,0.03571321,0.03440846,0.005054933,0.005154554,0.00055555685,0.013421357],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.6411579,0.14725706,0.12722567,0.009766313,0.07149124,0.0031017438],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.20976473,0.4973124,0.1943377,0.03126484,0.06236344,0.004956908],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.19384718,0.0018276515,0.0032634467,0.02834511,0.0034898643,0.012906925,0.0045781257,0.006164737,0.016726632],"category_scores_gemma":[0.6113404,0.001494103,0.004341609,0.02723403,0.008871418,0.012001299,0.010292667,0.0048017637,0.0062493645],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00083305576,0.00011785251,0.023871414,0.2216593,0.0016402644,0.0025475514,0.01077918,0.00030705432,0.0009498392,0.017681694,0.125289,0.59432375],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00036769986,0.0005579811,0.034934726,0.23731327,0.001791148,0.015033667,0.008808758,0.00038510404,0.0017987404,0.025681961,0.673022,0.0003049319],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012428002,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001314908,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9938353,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0047017517,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020615611,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99412996},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W2476748197","doi":"10.4018/978-1-60566-952-6.ch009","title":"Educational and Professional Technoethics","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Advances in information security, privacy, and ethics book series","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Happening; Upload; The Internet; Sociology; Public relations; Political science; Engineering ethics; Media studies; Internet privacy; Environmental ethics; Engineering; World Wide Web; Computer science; Art; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02065364137475983,"score_gpt":0.3373308955193599,"score_spread":0.3166772541446001,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2476748197","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0019814912,0.008676161,0.0035082565,0.009686718,0.0010262831,0.00004011923,0.000035115365,0.000056885347,0.97498906],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.10149751,0.016421411,0.0036692426,0.0025431314,0.0011232144,0.00013502534,0.00007026212,0.00012554541,0.8744147],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99793077,0.0007039377,0.00007550583,0.0001630845,0.00086793833,0.00025870407],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998041,0.0006956635,0.00011554202,0.00030688362,0.0004907773,0.00035021515],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001636282,0.00050136825,0.00027461356,0.0015898742,0.0032554236,0.0065963524,0.00059804687,0.0018512858,0.04141814],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0041517816,0.00023122784,0.00022114653,0.0015711893,0.006845431,0.0035153897,0.0028376859,0.002342633,0.010381983],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000883442,0.000047316495,0.00027077357,0.00016998943,0.0000024609838,0.00008641684,0.003799099,0.00026172065,0.00017527178,0.8147368,0.10109071,0.07935065],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002238022,0.00000960081,0.0003309935,0.0003301686,0.0000012211369,0.00011370325,0.0009190103,0.00019938003,0.00012717,0.07360365,0.9243588,0.0000040654404],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022022717,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0034920273,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99814874,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004068074,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004361384,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1385575},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2479355324","doi":"10.4018/978-1-4666-3930-0.ch007","title":"Embedding Plagiarism Detection Mechanisms into Learning Management Systems","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"IGI Global eBooks","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University of Edmonton","funders":"","keywords":"Plagiarism detection; Computer science; Architecture; Set (abstract data type); Embedding; Learning Management; Intellectual property; Software engineering; Plug-in; Service (business); Software; Multimedia; Artificial intelligence; Operating system; Programming language","score_opus":0.014681483784532023,"score_gpt":0.2663513914572157,"score_spread":0.25166990767268366,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2479355324","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03371742,0.021788826,0.7517655,0.0039133,0.000516852,0.00035908388,0.00033113215,0.013733524,0.1738744],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.39579594,0.02637974,0.40880477,0.0011198226,0.0008114541,0.0003781572,0.00100663,0.0016818692,0.16402154],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989837,0.00027849677,0.00007110107,0.00014965615,0.0004358897,0.00008114702],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99834275,0.00087669306,0.00010777149,0.00033439952,0.00026953476,0.00006877197],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013406454,0.00048354425,0.00037598173,0.0016902302,0.00055458216,0.0042059687,0.0013808787,0.0012910535,0.00871547],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0034913155,0.00037135606,0.0003322408,0.0016179734,0.0009992674,0.0050989715,0.0019264404,0.0016035418,0.00511796],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005597268,0.000116781965,0.0009758336,0.0009448926,0.000029473342,0.00021228558,0.0015252614,0.0029985686,0.011774118,0.11150279,0.017141607,0.85272247],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003352316,0.00015046119,0.0039458037,0.0015613302,0.0000857769,0.0010989071,0.00071620947,0.03511608,0.029788954,0.105007805,0.82240754,0.00008771446],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006839657,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00091161905,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99870896,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014119227,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009817043,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.029156208},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["research_integrity"],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"methods","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["research_integrity"],"domain":null,"study_design":"design_other","genre":"methods","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2495098945","doi":"10.4018/978-1-59904-801-7.ch013","title":"Minimizing Plagiarism by Redesigning the Learning Environment and Assessment","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"IGI Global eBooks","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Athabasca University","funders":"","keywords":"Cheating; Honesty; Deliverable; Action (physics); Process (computing); The Internet; Computer science; Mathematics education; Psychology; Engineering ethics; Engineering; World Wide Web; Social psychology","score_opus":0.032254959362619406,"score_gpt":0.2786387059380446,"score_spread":0.24638374657542517,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2495098945","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.046001345,0.0024869668,0.86942625,0.0047073285,0.00056424865,0.0024581335,0.00014735038,0.010581424,0.06362696],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.15699804,0.0021066507,0.7971703,0.00075793616,0.00025731936,0.0010372666,0.0003519202,0.0015855995,0.03973499],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9875009,0.0053262427,0.0010417189,0.0010530297,0.004654487,0.00042363442],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9679281,0.016816167,0.0021061043,0.005833972,0.0062767207,0.0010388893],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013468282,0.0013441644,0.0010889398,0.0024106542,0.001042834,0.009586485,0.0035659962,0.0019796612,0.008981744],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04410162,0.0004948039,0.0005096719,0.0015569266,0.0019040775,0.011494554,0.0034854955,0.003596472,0.007220103],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008952997,0.0005032386,0.0021887452,0.0011220683,0.000016677204,0.00020591254,0.007493033,0.0030029994,0.014037697,0.023921648,0.008626098,0.93879247],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001936374,0.0024478296,0.0150337415,0.0036008516,0.00019317851,0.0036152003,0.009142924,0.047692414,0.06998816,0.20435737,0.6432254,0.0005093673],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005073862,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010393735,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99802035,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014413492,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002097465,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07122791},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"other","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["research_integrity"],"domain":null,"study_design":"design_other","genre":"other","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2497010652","doi":"10.4018/978-1-60566-952-6.ch005","title":"The Nature and Areas of Technoethical Inquiry","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Advances in information security, privacy, and ethics book series","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Scope (computer science); Engineering ethics; Set (abstract data type); Ideal (ethics); Knowledge base; Management science; Sociology; Knowledge management; Epistemology; Computer science; Engineering; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.018150218210730144,"score_gpt":0.3275251693988377,"score_spread":0.30937495118810754,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2497010652","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009977326,0.08691876,0.061574332,0.066551924,0.001525995,0.00040179215,0.00007213458,0.00011398191,0.7728638],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5709697,0.16943721,0.09356583,0.015887221,0.0026717866,0.0029465875,0.00016496629,0.000300333,0.14405634],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97940445,0.014457861,0.0007061906,0.0009528934,0.0038301975,0.00064826506],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97101575,0.024000837,0.00070892496,0.0016627889,0.0021415728,0.0004701614],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018553432,0.000542378,0.00065004383,0.0055410443,0.0052252393,0.016296148,0.0016021744,0.0037309562,0.003431994],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01943718,0.00064222876,0.000538102,0.006196944,0.049668558,0.016216012,0.0058424086,0.007312695,0.0008701568],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000039698584,0.000009083233,0.00011229701,0.00016660696,0.0000019981187,0.000060444425,0.010693834,0.00020845026,0.00008203408,0.96752197,0.002509374,0.01862996],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000037344596,0.0000123071395,0.00031145426,0.0014586482,0.0000029815221,0.00021632676,0.010849196,0.0006328114,0.0001979243,0.7676516,0.21865001,0.00001303703],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020813716,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024498727,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99626905,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008453313,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01078235,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09812111},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2515051907","doi":"10.1145/2960811.2960817","title":"Using a Dictionary and n-gram Alignment to Improve Fine-grained Cross-Language Plagiarism Detection","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"University of Waterloo; University of Tehran","keywords":"Computer science; Plagiarism detection; Similarity (geometry); Focus (optics); Cross-language information retrieval; Information retrieval; Natural language processing; Precision and recall; Artificial intelligence; Machine translation; n-gram; Range (aeronautics); Language model","score_opus":0.019220214917136037,"score_gpt":0.33181875370369956,"score_spread":0.3125985387865635,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2515051907","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17668153,0.001715233,0.80029124,0.00044463816,0.00023680745,0.00054905907,0.0018901799,0.01151044,0.006680777],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.44772533,0.00059154956,0.54285437,0.00015939558,0.00012876192,0.00024306706,0.0038484258,0.00049423956,0.003954854],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99779534,0.0005586727,0.00030194173,0.0005182843,0.00067146687,0.0001544138],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9955232,0.0011142031,0.00076159724,0.00089416024,0.0014957367,0.00021114493],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013280615,0.0011724394,0.0012089671,0.006233114,0.0012072478,0.0013506595,0.00093620736,0.0010873859,0.002913422],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009868345,0.00034225578,0.00066128897,0.0054875882,0.0005901862,0.0027036567,0.0019818915,0.001270372,0.003529588],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00061142026,0.00042208482,0.015934601,0.000824171,0.00019880212,0.00045091708,0.000966169,0.0068488717,0.091609396,0.0036835417,0.010478584,0.86797154],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019329402,0.0009806576,0.04359396,0.00017527844,0.0003943269,0.0028148384,0.0018170193,0.75981516,0.13485682,0.018264834,0.036818538,0.00027529147],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0041096034,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008540954,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99891263,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005889317,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001611415,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.009746373},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2516745606","doi":"","title":"Reticent Researchers! Are We Failing Humanity?","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"2015 AGU Fall Meeting","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"","keywords":"Humanity; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.18878646427933768,"score_gpt":0.3938615002159999,"score_spread":0.20507503593666224,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2516745606","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"reproducibility","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":"reproducibility","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0018437153,0.002166381,0.00027492782,0.98389983,0.004053117,0.0000092331775,0.000025048425,0.000053445354,0.007674261],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.14263041,0.004475253,0.0017168294,0.79844147,0.013879304,0.00015184561,0.00012566529,0.0003638365,0.03821536],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.8757472,0.07389814,0.005168973,0.0060608317,0.026215335,0.012909578],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.4525663,0.19997112,0.048415735,0.049607858,0.11338898,0.13605002],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.13645396,0.0008358979,0.0019958282,0.004351095,0.031136287,0.03624155,0.004873685,0.032908965,0.032985628],"category_scores_gemma":[0.51934326,0.0012741097,0.0011261742,0.0047156783,0.053523548,0.028399715,0.018903421,0.049523756,0.01991438],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000076928234,0.00008775339,0.0063711223,0.00022890979,0.00012472927,0.0003642347,0.027857909,0.00004724199,0.00026249094,0.068535075,0.8602706,0.035772976],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010653984,0.00011011231,0.0058370363,0.0014070349,0.00008078046,0.00067638,0.0600507,0.00012062246,0.00045903985,0.14386249,0.7871303,0.00015897464],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007963867,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012249627,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.967091,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011689791,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05115776,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.72164613},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2520030777","doi":"10.5430/jnep.v7n1p124","title":"Implementing plagiarism awareness workshop to nursing faculty members, Damanhour University","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Nursing Education and Practice","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Medical education; Publication; Psychology; Significant difference; Perception; Nursing; Medicine; Internal medicine; Political science","score_opus":0.12180771550494375,"score_gpt":0.4675029095565396,"score_spread":0.3456951940515959,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2520030777","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98866534,0.00043645795,0.0018322204,0.0025304167,0.0002458459,0.0014693177,0.000067182074,0.00012664069,0.0046264813],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97749615,0.0007578964,0.008738935,0.0011387027,0.00018107267,0.0020014,0.00009124455,0.000013378719,0.009581276],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99805367,0.00091124827,0.00011197513,0.00017524906,0.00029981908,0.00044802614],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99138427,0.0018442266,0.0009001755,0.0003002948,0.0013262371,0.0042447094],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005380861,0.00037022724,0.00028603288,0.0005472894,0.0034644639,0.00099533,0.0011698612,0.0011106303,0.0065670544],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0071159415,0.00032220664,0.0003606631,0.00021098541,0.0006674763,0.00085659086,0.0023442004,0.0014212907,0.0008338888],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.002878631,0.026310649,0.15733907,0.004627716,0.00007270213,0.009644245,0.18943602,0.00115437,0.064552985,0.0012572319,0.03183081,0.51089555],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005166766,0.030283755,0.45225483,0.0017609316,0.00018525208,0.0034853232,0.31855768,0.0017539023,0.04830609,0.0020336856,0.14046536,0.00039653867],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007757461,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016416212,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9988894,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011866563,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0064884997,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028457046},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["research_integrity"],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"domain":"methods","study_design":"design_other","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2520832911","doi":"","title":"Academic Dishonesty and Achievement Motivation: A Delicate Relationship","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Higher education of social science","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Academic dishonesty; Psychology; Dishonesty; Cheating; Mathematics education; Islam; Need for achievement; Academic achievement; Connection (principal bundle); Relation (database); Social psychology; Theology; Engineering; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.054980116209029865,"score_gpt":0.360421443355411,"score_spread":0.3054413271463811,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2520832911","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9979182,0.000157107,0.00011195993,0.00021072541,0.000005018026,0.000004263327,0.000013484219,0.0000021761741,0.0015772027],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996308,0.000056641813,0.000053090433,0.000016823638,0.000006848162,0.0000016162994,0.000008587422,8.8194037e-7,0.00022471686],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988451,0.0004227561,0.00008318082,0.00012331642,0.00034565027,0.0001798732],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9883526,0.0049720188,0.0038642732,0.0005371517,0.00057823065,0.0016956734],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011131369,0.00022323134,0.00028718027,0.001033331,0.0007484073,0.0016296904,0.00039378126,0.0005010219,0.004116954],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0063774944,0.00016814488,0.00032596308,0.0007498176,0.0014920151,0.0007147977,0.0013034629,0.00124114,0.00023886215],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006159896,0.00018584628,0.9905302,0.000017543418,0.00006661028,0.00009686544,0.0015966606,0.000050003444,0.00027633453,0.0005162751,0.000053393214,0.0065487055],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000018704475,0.000075969045,0.9980128,0.0000110768415,0.0000134298225,0.00006812725,0.0013212885,0.00008412343,0.000048126436,0.00022499313,0.00013359661,0.0000046327145],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00172761,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002564798,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99949896,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00033018578,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00062245026,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.013772607},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2526660219","doi":"10.1016/j.tree.2016.09.004","title":"Fraud Not a Primary Cause of Irreproducible Results: A Reply to Clark et al.","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"Trends in Ecology & Evolution","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Scientific misconduct; Transparency (behavior); Misconduct; Value (mathematics); Scopus; Political science; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.03745739282184158,"score_gpt":0.33552074945534166,"score_spread":0.2980633566335001,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2526660219","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"reproducibility","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":"reproducibility","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000120485965,0.00040092514,0.000036012014,0.99547946,0.0034242487,0.0000031674724,0.000014626813,0.000009230991,0.0005118381],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0016902458,0.00029894308,0.00010027836,0.98859566,0.007982417,0.0000129651635,0.000008608874,0.000012102358,0.0012987093],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9889613,0.003187859,0.0015885421,0.0013730752,0.0037455843,0.0011437465],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93227017,0.043163266,0.004519644,0.0022024254,0.012082605,0.005761873],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01679715,0.00076244865,0.001871735,0.0010874951,0.006863853,0.0059061227,0.0038598988,0.11572243,0.005686926],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10487389,0.0011854961,0.0012763992,0.0014734862,0.009584512,0.0077501987,0.0032755097,0.08336353,0.005763358],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038779854,0.000019609446,0.0004807475,0.000034276734,0.000013395162,0.0007867231,0.00030491868,0.000030203078,0.000101357844,0.003229846,0.9905751,0.004385069],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017095728,0.00008869883,0.0012541431,0.0005212227,0.00005540276,0.0022609977,0.0012877303,0.00048781984,0.0007528375,0.026110215,0.9668434,0.0001665538],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0065339888,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010853244,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9832029,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0055138743,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0112612415,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.088832915},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2527904535","doi":"10.1016/j.tree.2016.09.006","title":"Scientific Misconduct: The Elephant in the Lab. A Response to Parker et al.","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"Trends in Ecology & Evolution","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick; University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Transparency (behavior); Scopus; Misconduct; Scientific misconduct; Web of science; Political science; Rigour; Library science; Law; Computer science; MEDLINE; Medicine; Epistemology; Philosophy; Alternative medicine","score_opus":0.03652023699549029,"score_gpt":0.3446946395113756,"score_spread":0.3081744025158853,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2527904535","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00017989887,0.0005839941,0.00005501895,0.98873234,0.009465564,0.0000064150877,0.00002545515,0.000028033692,0.0009233002],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0012766218,0.00036915345,0.00011764853,0.984869,0.010427005,0.000023196677,0.00001491935,0.00001646121,0.0028860008],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98900294,0.0030744886,0.0014015782,0.0013567912,0.003932706,0.0012314578],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9608692,0.017263534,0.0034864482,0.0017321104,0.0073111677,0.009337662],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0137985125,0.00088262407,0.0019602391,0.0011206121,0.009854773,0.0067882184,0.0036392342,0.08836508,0.008278289],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08226617,0.0011282875,0.001943901,0.0011942926,0.008067316,0.008592623,0.0052697156,0.07963596,0.008680428],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028728344,0.000027337668,0.00047398178,0.000026049887,0.000013380386,0.00088704773,0.00022193734,0.000022675786,0.000100740195,0.0010423413,0.99166274,0.0054932195],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011287324,0.00009803998,0.001212825,0.00037396685,0.000034701803,0.0025411816,0.0012066533,0.00029116875,0.00042331728,0.010032421,0.98357004,0.00010285198],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004666939,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009361442,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98620147,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005407249,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011297855,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07297444},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2535124877","doi":"10.1007/978-3-319-44468-0_14","title":"Learning Assessment Must Change in a World of Digital “Cheats”","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Athabasca University","funders":"","keywords":"Cheating; Function (biology); Digital native; Business; Engineering; Computer science; Psychology; World Wide Web; Social psychology","score_opus":0.05949613972256471,"score_gpt":0.33901380036270207,"score_spread":0.27951766064013733,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2535124877","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04261965,0.0035099937,0.039473165,0.24655543,0.002061148,0.00008564119,0.00006389978,0.00051261624,0.66511846],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7206647,0.0018260403,0.01870692,0.01867451,0.0011929289,0.00008846751,0.000062137486,0.00037945528,0.23840481],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9863452,0.0058307936,0.00051531655,0.0010202655,0.005454184,0.00083426095],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96385586,0.015602586,0.0030568251,0.004028185,0.009906145,0.003550402],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012860229,0.00034486092,0.0004575771,0.00140672,0.0058575026,0.017443882,0.0014464793,0.00509136,0.009538758],"category_scores_gemma":[0.055722572,0.0002531537,0.00029997504,0.0013190159,0.015036152,0.019578924,0.007214042,0.009128086,0.0043821307],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029109266,0.00012685143,0.0043754457,0.000117562326,0.000015925967,0.00015595241,0.026314124,0.0007194121,0.0004571377,0.62601274,0.07232295,0.26935276],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007005333,0.00003541127,0.0026199745,0.00031039055,0.000008339437,0.00022535115,0.011270273,0.001057199,0.00060616335,0.6554168,0.3284064,0.00003672072],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026704483,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004444671,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99490863,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0040741796,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009358604,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06801218},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2546973172","doi":"","title":"Factors underlying students’ appropriate or inappropriate use of scholarly sources in academic writing, and instructors’ responses","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"","keywords":"Academic integrity; Academic writing; Psychology; Mathematics education; Medical education; Pedagogy; Medicine; Social psychology","score_opus":0.48282338354226384,"score_gpt":0.5712130073040649,"score_spread":0.08838962376180104,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2546973172","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9953185,0.00016405125,0.00032285883,0.0016557439,0.00004479398,0.000032683147,0.000024840634,0.000014671399,0.0024218827],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99821067,0.0001328328,0.00017191975,0.00031809096,0.000028621447,0.00004334757,0.000020984617,0.000016404016,0.0010570704],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9711049,0.012113067,0.0035035585,0.0023564138,0.008934526,0.00198764],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8430157,0.08188815,0.039957937,0.0040884237,0.01925928,0.011790442],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01860257,0.0003490998,0.0006064068,0.0028608062,0.003211106,0.011823645,0.0015167175,0.0027012355,0.0030909951],"category_scores_gemma":[0.18401538,0.00055933575,0.0004987952,0.0019465756,0.0050767604,0.0041440194,0.005831838,0.00459858,0.0011013781],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00030046818,0.0008357625,0.32198575,0.00033096227,0.00007479916,0.0012314632,0.63626087,0.00022874858,0.0030554167,0.001660284,0.0023294922,0.031705923],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000045561013,0.00032856528,0.25833172,0.00033511853,0.000052955333,0.0006068881,0.7266591,0.0006927275,0.001314626,0.0025620498,0.008932311,0.00013845331],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002419278,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035715064,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9972988,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025740932,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033443482,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09838092},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2550357391","doi":"10.5539/jel.v6n1p158","title":"Academic Misconduct: An Investigation into Male Students’ Perceptions, Experiences &amp; Attitudes towards Cheating and Plagiarism in a Middle Eastern University Context","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Education and Learning","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cheating; Academic dishonesty; Misconduct; Academic integrity; Context (archaeology); Psychology; Likert scale; Population; The Internet; Test (biology); Higher education; Medical education; Social psychology; Sociology; Medicine; Political science; Law; Developmental psychology","score_opus":0.05703019522157006,"score_gpt":0.35848784957282187,"score_spread":0.3014576543512518,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2550357391","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9991358,0.00009663999,0.00003581191,0.00017083896,0.00000480453,0.000008631716,0.00001318354,0.0000011397435,0.00053323805],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989268,0.00017401896,0.000038753224,0.00013057292,0.0000070582,0.000008773222,0.0000090984495,0.0000011655958,0.000703767],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99806684,0.000764731,0.00012110723,0.00010831576,0.00043978053,0.00049929705],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9947461,0.0013291484,0.0016650798,0.00015246175,0.0008090602,0.0012982002],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021920435,0.00029567565,0.00047031033,0.0012180633,0.0036931494,0.0028917016,0.00051028415,0.00083523715,0.002548356],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0051342985,0.00037101688,0.00038350926,0.0009659449,0.0016244751,0.0015109681,0.002028858,0.0014881769,0.0005577519],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009580227,0.00089197786,0.4776336,0.00016952242,0.00002641156,0.0016700432,0.49623808,0.000036313373,0.0017920726,0.00050897704,0.00068889087,0.020248268],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000035565292,0.00071714906,0.28176382,0.000068439746,0.000018233992,0.0012026698,0.71105987,0.000097954115,0.0005739384,0.000107965745,0.004356772,0.00002966205],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004006859,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007607744,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99916476,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012898552,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013748261,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.011592805},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["research_integrity"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2552456085","doi":"10.5539/res.v8n4p158","title":"Review of Academic Dishonesty among College Students","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of European Studies","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cheating; Honesty; Academic dishonesty; Sincerity; Psychology; Dishonesty; Academic integrity; Test (biology); Significant difference; Mathematics education; Social psychology; Statistics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.06298013352163381,"score_gpt":0.4036076838006719,"score_spread":0.3406275502790381,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2552456085","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017706506,0.97236115,0.0002674892,0.0040044975,0.0013967449,0.00011009974,0.0007272247,0.000022544242,0.003403803],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.06640257,0.92996025,0.0003140891,0.0011086767,0.0009155786,0.00007047981,0.0005172773,0.000012486817,0.0006985981],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","domain_scores_codex":[0.99631643,0.0010120847,0.0011718054,0.00030963216,0.0010831337,0.00010686773],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95640117,0.020496668,0.0065480773,0.0007727169,0.014747372,0.0010341288],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0046968386,0.00033037816,0.0014345291,0.011301514,0.0006882698,0.0017447069,0.00093404995,0.0009550151,0.0025071574],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022972435,0.00043126938,0.0008256264,0.0113251535,0.0008937108,0.0014990023,0.00060700264,0.00079223595,0.000570794],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00043714276,0.00020805055,0.06340476,0.14259543,0.0010719773,0.0006899113,0.005111429,0.00010352108,0.0009779958,0.0014800957,0.06987304,0.7140467],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000054649896,0.000650226,0.32158694,0.16079393,0.0035835837,0.0035934655,0.011897631,0.00019980171,0.0009107266,0.0005432479,0.49604517,0.0001406281],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009136622,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014425403,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.999045,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014153295,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0051541263,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02483952},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2552820166","doi":"10.1186/s41073-016-0024-5","title":"Ranking major and minor research misbehaviors: results from a survey among participants of four World Conferences on Research Integrity","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research Integrity and Peer Review","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":219,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Women's College Research Institute","keywords":"Minor (academic); Misconduct; Psychology; Quality (philosophy); Product (mathematics); Social psychology; Public relations; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.6723211565749861,"score_gpt":0.5540285380960718,"score_spread":0.11829261847891437,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2552820166","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99729484,0.00035024414,0.00034280663,0.0006964334,0.000018247782,0.00010690148,0.00021591234,0.000013457662,0.00096115784],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979742,0.00038038916,0.0006226987,0.00034507285,0.000039333463,0.00013640818,0.00019987395,0.000009544387,0.0002924564],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9748862,0.014333942,0.0034281935,0.0011870671,0.0043785777,0.0017860421],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.85384655,0.05538365,0.057700023,0.0047511975,0.016514136,0.011804485],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03749491,0.00034070452,0.0005703502,0.0032555058,0.0015965695,0.0026983644,0.0009352766,0.0016435345,0.0015034527],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09481368,0.00041145075,0.00070371927,0.0020050844,0.0012505804,0.0024740607,0.0027784756,0.0019159355,0.00051086355],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023602809,0.0002895757,0.9273244,0.0003167898,0.00010251679,0.00018020178,0.046602488,0.000089366345,0.00090067304,0.00013344761,0.0014180437,0.022406414],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022380753,0.0007395224,0.8869693,0.00020585454,0.000047600348,0.0004997964,0.1065211,0.0004964173,0.000436767,0.00018582073,0.00380333,0.000072052884],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027030127,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022635025,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99835646,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012745254,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018386601,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1982944},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2553821009","doi":"","title":"The Internet and Classroom Plagiarism: Dealing with the Problem","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Internet Banking and Commerce","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"The Internet; Computer science; World Wide Web; Internet privacy; Plagiarism detection; Multimedia; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.014614306311377393,"score_gpt":0.26035088831552144,"score_spread":0.24573658200414406,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2553821009","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07778031,0.04078811,0.065209806,0.6299091,0.0035438465,0.00030124962,0.00006651946,0.0010575689,0.18134347],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.78874165,0.035898246,0.06505535,0.033722263,0.008222399,0.00046367128,0.00009762236,0.0007336782,0.06706513],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98248637,0.0114836125,0.0007799753,0.0008565058,0.003727074,0.00066651136],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.91296846,0.05972051,0.0073304796,0.005961133,0.008572373,0.00544715],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011250845,0.00066708145,0.000943283,0.005361544,0.00988308,0.012131114,0.0023514065,0.00900902,0.014772133],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06799076,0.00052725495,0.0005427537,0.0036116662,0.010419415,0.02547718,0.007153114,0.009713364,0.0033646452],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001630747,0.0008934832,0.014515058,0.0013370791,0.00007065253,0.0015768908,0.037723333,0.0007844153,0.001459354,0.13235542,0.11718826,0.691933],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003395852,0.0006124531,0.026550265,0.0030441051,0.00018451682,0.013889861,0.09455422,0.00594244,0.0038039326,0.29068464,0.5600986,0.00029538415],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002302059,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004406089,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.990991,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003301666,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0064545083,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.059500813},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2566325335","doi":"10.1126/science.354.6318.1361","title":"In Canada, case spurs concern over misconduct secrecy","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Secrecy; Misconduct; Scientific misconduct; Political science; Computer security; Criminology; Law; Psychology; Medicine; Computer science; Pathology","score_opus":0.03715781374551499,"score_gpt":0.32535060775342367,"score_spread":0.2881927940079087,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2566325335","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.028772006,0.0012477603,0.0022744641,0.79263675,0.0037860565,0.00010059149,0.0003308589,0.00028959935,0.17056192],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.25907204,0.0017160615,0.0022281585,0.56752473,0.0011668111,0.000048869304,0.00018028465,0.00016490043,0.1678982],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9850108,0.0011362564,0.00044244705,0.0010715509,0.008479398,0.0038595796],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94405144,0.016667819,0.0024223633,0.0018535858,0.025139896,0.009864847],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009943871,0.00040742627,0.000632189,0.0019172964,0.041116007,0.010369953,0.0033093323,0.021154871,0.0106384335],"category_scores_gemma":[0.043886647,0.00059629243,0.0007569596,0.00265966,0.011441195,0.0042127986,0.00265602,0.021174131,0.0017474273],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004238841,0.00007583856,0.01839778,0.00013781025,0.000037706784,0.0031447955,0.013175128,0.00024201725,0.0010942938,0.15856284,0.78065866,0.024430841],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028375352,0.00007044816,0.017070688,0.00041314846,0.00010163805,0.00205404,0.029486433,0.0009926178,0.002265448,0.0182294,0.9291101,0.00017765728],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9102039,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9746611,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9788451,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.043629304,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12872228,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31655425},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2572250704","doi":"10.37514/atd-j.2014.11.2.07","title":"Academic Integrity , Remix Culture, Globalization: A Canadian Case Study of Student and Faculty Perceptions of Plagiarism","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Across the Disciplines","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Academic integrity; Globalization; Perception; Higher education; Sociology; Pedagogy; Faculty development; Teaching method; Mathematics education; Political science; Psychology; Professional development","score_opus":0.0455717384598111,"score_gpt":0.4168868331949012,"score_spread":0.3713150947350901,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2572250704","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99158305,0.00019996092,0.0000787274,0.0019597376,0.000014094973,0.000035953122,0.000031439777,0.0000033676329,0.00609379],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99791664,0.00029302575,0.00010814567,0.000253946,0.00000426402,0.0000137108145,0.00001569556,0.0000045324246,0.0013900576],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9890274,0.003170571,0.0003534328,0.0005647732,0.003048742,0.0038350394],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9721881,0.009835869,0.004251004,0.00078058627,0.006553807,0.0063906517],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010914758,0.0005058113,0.0007919182,0.004036335,0.054095794,0.010595364,0.0032300442,0.0028673427,0.0029232537],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030153219,0.0005057862,0.00048989797,0.008337027,0.018434133,0.0047702733,0.008602317,0.005507333,0.00017357277],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000411483,0.00016771953,0.037198097,0.00003704267,0.000009126768,0.00066448573,0.9534088,0.00006104678,0.00018593173,0.0026697014,0.0008720243,0.0046848753],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000047147428,0.000029431505,0.017506182,0.000040409665,0.000007408558,0.000094374474,0.97852844,0.00006739007,0.0000812757,0.00016881013,0.0034524638,0.000019069214],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9644587,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9847707,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99713266,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.098922126,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1795793,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7177336},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["research_integrity"],"domain":null,"study_design":"qualitative","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":true,"about_ca_topic":true,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"domain":"methods","study_design":"qualitative","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":true,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2580345288","doi":"","title":"SPECIAL ISSUE: Academic Misconduct in Accounting Education","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"˜The œAccounting educators' journal","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Misconduct; Accounting; Political science; Scientific misconduct; Psychology; Medical education; Business; Medicine; Law; Alternative medicine","score_opus":0.027283584858400316,"score_gpt":0.3544162732772709,"score_spread":0.32713268841887055,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2580345288","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0011613584,0.011798812,0.0003024224,0.14432913,0.8293538,0.00008991523,0.00012390729,0.00013624826,0.012704435],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0041331314,0.0056535145,0.00018530531,0.03253167,0.9444553,0.00009277896,0.000084548905,0.00011096269,0.012752705],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98240685,0.0030531334,0.0034779934,0.0015666173,0.0076893684,0.0018060583],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8877835,0.060741857,0.012645473,0.004327142,0.021036433,0.013465568],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015172288,0.002747924,0.0042839935,0.010653265,0.013076101,0.026618628,0.00485898,0.026262619,0.021314202],"category_scores_gemma":[0.052033074,0.0016981022,0.0024185863,0.004783771,0.0085368445,0.00799036,0.006905823,0.016936287,0.006145762],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036136233,0.00015471425,0.0007204016,0.00037505425,0.000022343886,0.00037929023,0.00021832067,0.000074866584,0.00015867784,0.0015879138,0.9822128,0.014059353],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000046143654,0.00018919438,0.005274988,0.0017238983,0.00007494364,0.0013050685,0.001304131,0.00053631276,0.00027315278,0.0031886909,0.9859926,0.00009101719],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002881843,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010156715,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97373736,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00679293,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011979641,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08023971},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2586731707","doi":"10.1145/3024906.3024910","title":"Negotiating the Maze of Academic Integrity in Computing Education","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":76,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Mount Royal University; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Academic integrity; Confusion; Teamwork; Negotiation; Computer science; Coding (social sciences); Best practice; Engineering ethics; Knowledge management; Mathematics education; Psychology; Political science; Sociology; Engineering","score_opus":0.033244754200550175,"score_gpt":0.3556579219469971,"score_spread":0.3224131677464469,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2586731707","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13715415,0.0051118033,0.08171677,0.5969028,0.0015625552,0.0002556778,0.000059286675,0.00033028494,0.17690665],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9667567,0.0011532592,0.012078967,0.013051462,0.00046423922,0.00013679739,0.000026771611,0.00017771914,0.006154163],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.67323,0.2232551,0.014137131,0.013342625,0.06124666,0.014788553],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.5355709,0.26504406,0.042074516,0.032770723,0.0667211,0.0578186],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.21282193,0.0007023725,0.0017587268,0.007971756,0.04135503,0.06414176,0.006915791,0.01223358,0.0050373464],"category_scores_gemma":[0.3510932,0.0014514682,0.0010519957,0.004387518,0.08795903,0.053063728,0.06149964,0.034511574,0.0023047666],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000094173236,0.0001952737,0.015528365,0.00034644312,0.00007997944,0.0006416997,0.24802108,0.0012015243,0.0005887759,0.60559654,0.01817805,0.109528],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030985,0.0001599397,0.004012408,0.0014452778,0.0000326041,0.0005940321,0.20899945,0.0017097784,0.0010191727,0.67575645,0.106062695,0.00017728444],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006166107,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0058115916,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98776644,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017822227,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07359282,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9707307},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2587511691","doi":"10.1634/theoncologist.2016-0371","title":"Predatory Invitations from Journals: More Than Just a Nuisance?","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Oncologist","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":73,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Translational Research in Oncology; Institute of Cancer Research; University of Alberta; Ottawa Public Health; Ottawa Hospital; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Family medicine","score_opus":0.14680079515793984,"score_gpt":0.44178195580643137,"score_spread":0.29498116064849156,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2587511691","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9818178,0.0019036861,0.0020964157,0.0053558387,0.00015985851,0.00013619663,0.00025976368,0.00009228338,0.008178221],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99523807,0.0006455747,0.0010246002,0.0014252678,0.0004422134,0.00005828325,0.00010183807,0.000034939534,0.0010293258],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9806849,0.0103323795,0.0023496985,0.0010810638,0.004833583,0.00071831985],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.70857507,0.1354579,0.12298972,0.009463744,0.01846397,0.0050495327],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015177619,0.00023958908,0.0005515871,0.0040884637,0.0017003259,0.0032317073,0.00062708376,0.0009663997,0.0042977533],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1593714,0.0002784934,0.00024338668,0.0033665518,0.0019180167,0.0027471492,0.0015206387,0.0009630398,0.0011450105],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00067864114,0.00027070788,0.88704723,0.0007807082,0.00014065143,0.0010701228,0.0337892,0.00009309996,0.0020758903,0.0018119202,0.0076617077,0.064580075],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002448005,0.0004595246,0.938182,0.0007091808,0.00010040123,0.004833989,0.028397257,0.00078695314,0.0016469836,0.002544024,0.022243444,0.00007169743],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009958883,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012173193,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99903363,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013054475,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011044225,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.080267906},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2587902391","doi":"","title":"Self-Reporting in Plagiarism Research: How Honest is This Approach?","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of research practice","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Harm; Psychology; Phenomenon; Reliability (semiconductor); Medical education; Social psychology; Medicine; Epistemology; Power (physics)","score_opus":0.3082897255954191,"score_gpt":0.5172569451949262,"score_spread":0.20896721959950704,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2587902391","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":"methods","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10004688,0.0724712,0.20058459,0.5708867,0.017345056,0.002792319,0.0005792292,0.0006905054,0.034603585],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.66977555,0.041686125,0.15625021,0.107503876,0.012183468,0.0062965374,0.0004094343,0.00062778936,0.0052669384],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.27274716,0.58114225,0.048558466,0.012137783,0.083013654,0.0024007566],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.093500964,0.64345115,0.089053355,0.060953327,0.107710436,0.005330793],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.5983971,0.0011634473,0.0033878363,0.008786465,0.008329517,0.018071154,0.007213718,0.009264393,0.0019542286],"category_scores_gemma":[0.815392,0.0019627644,0.0024429406,0.008828395,0.030054627,0.028394984,0.012857755,0.014209448,0.0018218594],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006496958,0.0005283939,0.18209556,0.009701111,0.001909443,0.000662383,0.2803244,0.0006363778,0.0017253818,0.048118528,0.04266624,0.43098244],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004325807,0.0019466076,0.18017833,0.08733431,0.0021570523,0.005697538,0.23487988,0.008492425,0.007300896,0.20885508,0.26102293,0.0017023135],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008662913,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010547289,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9907356,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0068366188,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015403314,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49524796},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"domain":"methods","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"domain":"methods","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W2594393013","doi":"10.24908/pceea.v0i0.6536","title":"A Literature Review on the Culture of Cheating in Undergraduate Engineering Programs","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Proceedings of the Canadian Engineering Education Association (CEEA)","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"University of Saskatchewan","keywords":"Cheating; Context (archaeology); Work (physics); Attribution; Academic integrity; Engineering education; Process (computing); Psychology; Engineering ethics; Computer science; Social psychology; Engineering; Engineering management; Geography","score_opus":0.03225482653638319,"score_gpt":0.3116013859181873,"score_spread":0.27934655938180414,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2594393013","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004438229,0.9866915,0.00033193664,0.0035481954,0.0003302653,0.000029916662,0.00015966703,0.000015355738,0.0044550668],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.020090658,0.9777419,0.0005141825,0.001070994,0.00013860036,0.000036474543,0.00014313794,0.000008470794,0.00025565058],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","domain_scores_codex":[0.99286735,0.002597664,0.0014464487,0.0006340998,0.0021182306,0.00033611106],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9339851,0.0504833,0.0057210703,0.0007825837,0.008104385,0.00092353206],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009219248,0.0007019917,0.0015555004,0.016375752,0.0018859806,0.0052603437,0.0015164785,0.001568849,0.0032871081],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029921098,0.00073360576,0.0014147972,0.02574915,0.0026134453,0.005246384,0.0018871956,0.001984315,0.0006402581],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000100594516,0.00011706643,0.010498927,0.15517771,0.00046162668,0.0005520145,0.023245066,0.00039496343,0.00052669167,0.012453103,0.04307258,0.7533996],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001883009,0.00012134585,0.0837919,0.4583537,0.0011703348,0.0015180932,0.041049562,0.00016229588,0.00054666656,0.0029456578,0.41019717,0.00012445472],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03634025,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06624119,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99843115,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0061675594,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018067928,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0722574},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2599752520","doi":"10.4103/ija.ija_710_16","title":"Salami publishing and ethical dilemmas facing editors","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Indian Journal of Anaesthesia","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Medicine; Similarity (geometry); Kindness; Medical journal; Computer science; Political science; Law; Family medicine; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.025820376005126593,"score_gpt":0.30830774452063936,"score_spread":0.28248736851551276,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2599752520","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002763588,0.005708395,0.001177854,0.9584919,0.024225676,0.000034581306,0.000015737245,0.0000745176,0.0075077275],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.098106034,0.005929732,0.0057513947,0.8034942,0.075217895,0.00020386867,0.000032921816,0.0002905918,0.010973338],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.8381318,0.09430335,0.014441317,0.0072229495,0.037571885,0.008328609],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.5108123,0.333103,0.036176834,0.02231718,0.044056408,0.053534295],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.16630787,0.0009273757,0.0014765349,0.0031196421,0.020118963,0.03146348,0.005712593,0.03462571,0.011365346],"category_scores_gemma":[0.462349,0.001657965,0.0014576113,0.0025942358,0.029638292,0.018510794,0.019314358,0.041669484,0.004315751],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010293998,0.000099157136,0.0022914319,0.0005745806,0.00009575125,0.005712072,0.044221804,0.00018029816,0.00044196146,0.14143056,0.7526362,0.052213345],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000055316414,0.00007159226,0.0006437684,0.0013974393,0.000038121518,0.0047428887,0.015018896,0.0005112506,0.00036106896,0.08742532,0.8895777,0.00015666653],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011227257,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017661286,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9653743,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009275223,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.022064533,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.87953055},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2600362709","doi":"","title":"Self-Plagiarism: Some Common Sense, Some Reasonable Accommodation","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Nursing Research","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Accommodation; Psychology; Common sense; Sense (electronics); Social psychology; Philosophy; Engineering; Epistemology; Neuroscience","score_opus":0.11547710679411571,"score_gpt":0.4033734377382912,"score_spread":0.2878963309441755,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2600362709","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.114739515,0.04261793,0.10136228,0.62040496,0.006672847,0.00054049393,0.0007150278,0.0007315281,0.1122154],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9300381,0.010288477,0.025104068,0.022065084,0.004939145,0.00041522866,0.00027160242,0.0002666318,0.006611711],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9210748,0.041482557,0.01206277,0.005245368,0.016723583,0.0034107629],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7537206,0.14171107,0.024098009,0.033339635,0.03960183,0.007528943],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06528219,0.0011405363,0.0026373072,0.0118680755,0.013037224,0.027695185,0.006956318,0.015445966,0.008762746],"category_scores_gemma":[0.25112167,0.0012154285,0.0017579962,0.009338467,0.052001897,0.04315181,0.015654609,0.012571895,0.0014106043],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00035087104,0.00015190477,0.032304477,0.0021112883,0.00019298507,0.0047536977,0.09310418,0.00059498026,0.0008092784,0.68132365,0.046575047,0.13772766],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000082520615,0.00023954589,0.016538367,0.008571137,0.00020498785,0.016963435,0.26496273,0.0043113674,0.0012538816,0.5761688,0.11020411,0.00049907155],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007071723,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010340159,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98455405,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007729556,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0108655,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34524935},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["research_integrity"],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"commentary","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["research_integrity"],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"commentary","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W2600608324","doi":"10.18260/1-2--640","title":"Promoting Academic Integrity Through An Online Module","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Division of Undergraduate Education; Northern Illinois University","keywords":"Academic dishonesty; Cheating; Academic integrity; Commit; Reputation; Dishonesty; Psychology; Pejorative; Misconduct; Institution; Polling; Public relations; Internet privacy; Social psychology; Computer science; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.14153615882475812,"score_gpt":0.3758022690643087,"score_spread":0.23426611023955057,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2600608324","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.046181,0.0010082755,0.03871913,0.018801577,0.0121997055,0.0033318326,0.026761614,0.02868585,0.82431114],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.10040346,0.001511431,0.041714713,0.009333087,0.0096805645,0.0021460983,0.018460216,0.0057282085,0.81102204],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99842936,0.00042268267,0.00011812758,0.00012845443,0.0007104329,0.00019102271],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9858537,0.0038908592,0.0022596056,0.0018697153,0.0036823745,0.0024438533],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017041068,0.00059988507,0.0004073259,0.002504509,0.0012805692,0.0034744823,0.0012413055,0.0012291985,0.42792836],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012048238,0.00025230867,0.0005798874,0.0019697607,0.00046725455,0.0035707974,0.0043118927,0.0011172992,0.248242],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010917652,0.00031621836,0.001304817,0.00049920514,0.0000075752087,0.00015189378,0.00031653186,0.00010778218,0.0027854817,0.0018593386,0.7819159,0.21062613],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025578793,0.00033889594,0.008980372,0.00025416035,0.0000145897375,0.00022660205,0.00016392431,0.00036370993,0.0026622596,0.0017267868,0.985211,0.00003194676],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00019826395,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00051861553,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9987708,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00048733424,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001092599,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.81599075},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2605728678","doi":"","title":"Ma Students' Viewpoints about Academic Misconduct, Its Reasons and Anti-Plagiarism Policies and Procedures in Iran","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Journal of Language Teaching Methods","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Popularity; Misconduct; Academic integrity; Psychology; Viewpoints; The Internet; Higher education; Public relations; Medical education; Political science; Social psychology; Law; Computer science; Medicine; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.04879961989108166,"score_gpt":0.43977940953979267,"score_spread":0.390979789648711,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2605728678","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9246766,0.005035543,0.00038404923,0.034426186,0.00044474337,0.000051798066,0.00005540727,0.000030657982,0.03489502],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9922035,0.0017184486,0.00012709778,0.0021349918,0.00011156439,0.000013330579,0.000013585078,0.0000053666704,0.0036722012],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99510163,0.0017202209,0.00029153586,0.00020815944,0.0016608102,0.0010177214],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9910527,0.002211008,0.0019627295,0.00019930353,0.0027121492,0.0018620827],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005928194,0.00028070726,0.0003631735,0.0021898502,0.008340675,0.0045604217,0.0007678779,0.002185901,0.003930702],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012055585,0.00022398114,0.00039685413,0.0015650204,0.0038131515,0.001716694,0.0020691357,0.0029858937,0.00052634865],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017232471,0.000336248,0.17888774,0.0007846264,0.000050246097,0.004703659,0.67519647,0.00023492886,0.003231879,0.022968901,0.025580097,0.08785292],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011608396,0.00024436353,0.12011189,0.0007138411,0.000053149928,0.0026700585,0.68940973,0.00022052482,0.0011610402,0.0031969098,0.18211529,0.00009160374],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007751498,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009486201,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9978141,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006117688,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007033026,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.044387102},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2606134377","doi":"10.18260/1-2--23192","title":"The Writing Style of Predatory Publishers","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"U.S. Department of Defense; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Style (visual arts); Deception; Writing style; Misconduct; Computer science; Psychology; Literature; Political science; Social psychology; Art; Law","score_opus":0.032226540765886116,"score_gpt":0.28883387192855997,"score_spread":0.25660733116267387,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2606134377","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018170271,0.028989037,0.010039941,0.43469182,0.044727955,0.00007955887,0.00033449696,0.0008089652,0.46215802],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.33090582,0.01924206,0.008054859,0.12316872,0.036518555,0.00021066298,0.00031959236,0.0024316679,0.479148],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9507136,0.017634144,0.0026130264,0.0046002073,0.022921182,0.0015178288],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8577546,0.061998013,0.016433468,0.014567675,0.038266335,0.010979958],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.027069585,0.0006691356,0.0005062191,0.0038089934,0.010901936,0.033404216,0.0020240229,0.0036458743,0.017562455],"category_scores_gemma":[0.13801172,0.0006706959,0.0003886209,0.0036910183,0.013847627,0.0131038455,0.009560181,0.008177314,0.015068375],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007535977,0.000020846597,0.0026007006,0.00034969297,0.00002759569,0.00062731147,0.033125278,0.00008862613,0.0007978224,0.18874487,0.6732363,0.100305595],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008901171,0.000017287457,0.0006394018,0.0003119264,0.000006708155,0.0005358717,0.0046104044,0.000078381236,0.00037501485,0.01895322,0.9744319,0.000030973],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019429447,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033567157,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9963541,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0048974142,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0056035523,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14315933},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2606622294","doi":"10.1016/j.wneu.2017.04.014","title":"Retraction of Neurosurgical Publications: A Systematic Review","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"World Neurosurgery","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":53,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Hospital for Sick Children; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Medical physics; General surgery","score_opus":0.19839670561503756,"score_gpt":0.43591784524125055,"score_spread":0.237521139626213,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2606622294","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.001080091,0.99150145,0.00033415013,0.0029885657,0.0015005814,0.0010872509,0.00088750763,0.000019026294,0.0006012968],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.03150425,0.9531638,0.002435126,0.007900961,0.001558807,0.0021509381,0.00090490107,0.000041110317,0.00034000605],"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","domain_scores_codex":[0.8179763,0.071076825,0.07421179,0.00599752,0.027689543,0.0030479957],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.5937137,0.2604143,0.093065515,0.009598044,0.040307373,0.0029010032],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.09358982,0.0027777944,0.01195075,0.022780582,0.0023092148,0.0076720105,0.0040439675,0.0070313546,0.008684327],"category_scores_gemma":[0.4045801,0.0027362043,0.009908962,0.022883378,0.0040399903,0.010005188,0.0064237397,0.0042743245,0.0010027025],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":"systematic_review","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003815787,0.000018935678,0.0015287555,0.94635266,0.009307189,0.00024173793,0.0006518558,0.000034681412,0.00010025786,0.0002190286,0.011720638,0.029442796],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00086670293,0.000084492836,0.0042693135,0.91638833,0.044717677,0.00047423158,0.00094506005,0.00004592569,0.00012585314,0.00050334685,0.03150183,0.00007727263],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0076325964,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.027509293,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9929686,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0081529785,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.040933345,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4949562},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"systematic_review","genre":"review","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"domain":"methods","study_design":"systematic_review","genre":"review","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W2609387831","doi":"10.5430/jnep.v7n9p107","title":"Improving knowledge, skills, and attitudes of the nursing faculty members and postgraduate students towards plagiarism in academic writing","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Nursing Education and Practice","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Mansoura University","keywords":"Interview; Psychology; Medical education; Positive correlation; Sample (material); Schedule; Scale (ratio); Nursing; Medicine; Internal medicine; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.09015827338278433,"score_gpt":0.5041274045002521,"score_spread":0.41396913111746775,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2609387831","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99832124,0.00020404396,0.0002344177,0.00015196527,0.000011375699,0.000048967606,0.000009643517,0.000008332829,0.0010099127],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973755,0.00033825907,0.0009585213,0.00008797761,0.000017186445,0.00008188879,0.000025830734,0.0000014895951,0.0011133371],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99891734,0.0004543963,0.00007819398,0.000100684105,0.00028681464,0.00016246422],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99573416,0.0014772647,0.0010856923,0.00019600218,0.0004800559,0.0010269693],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017996475,0.00027542113,0.0002409496,0.00037689164,0.00047792905,0.0005933795,0.00033803357,0.00044824166,0.003062811],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008077549,0.00012667142,0.00027688846,0.00018642242,0.00025717483,0.00046972837,0.0007992591,0.0005208615,0.000506354],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0015414377,0.020397095,0.30177003,0.002145416,0.00008617158,0.000640776,0.023678634,0.0006649286,0.027955793,0.00019083754,0.002893664,0.6180352],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020233286,0.021582166,0.94622475,0.0005058398,0.000103586804,0.0011596774,0.013016174,0.0008493996,0.0101830745,0.00047385643,0.0056497203,0.000049290356],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00039953442,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005961472,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9995518,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00028516538,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00096832507,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.010246158},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2612995190","doi":"10.11575/prism/31620","title":"Academic Integrity and plagiarism: Supplementary materials for educator workshops","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Open MIND","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Calgary","keywords":"Academic integrity; Academic dishonesty; Mathematics education; Pedagogy; Engineering ethics; Computer science; Higher education; Sociology; Psychology; Political science; Engineering; Law","score_opus":0.09214868474286698,"score_gpt":0.41951267966739614,"score_spread":0.32736399492452917,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2612995190","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015510421,0.003330395,0.1572905,0.08504647,0.028901052,0.02800593,0.051377296,0.030145261,0.60039264],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.023063302,0.003466746,0.14414279,0.019679679,0.003133662,0.024762923,0.018639233,0.006233115,0.7568786],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963264,0.001589595,0.00039527146,0.0002147294,0.001058542,0.00041551774],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96876466,0.017672943,0.0012729961,0.0018368997,0.008021916,0.002430572],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0071039656,0.0012904948,0.000999375,0.002583418,0.0021711302,0.0027672653,0.0021702875,0.0028727632,0.37307933],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031550247,0.00094351586,0.0008301337,0.001255402,0.0007709802,0.0027597344,0.0036850732,0.0036158229,0.1616279],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000046815072,0.0001755834,0.00008537329,0.00043192916,0.0000018252596,0.00012455655,0.0010324675,0.00010882702,0.00065664155,0.0013310992,0.9373376,0.0586673],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000048915655,0.00010358803,0.0006303593,0.0005608449,0.0000029200446,0.0001653043,0.0013102886,0.00014667807,0.0006265284,0.0034915232,0.9928826,0.000030506273],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015641147,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0075915908,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99712723,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020959538,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005166317,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.89422625},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2613383989","doi":"10.1186/s41073-017-0031-1","title":"Retractions in cancer research: a systematic survey","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research Integrity and Peer Review","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":83,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Juravinski Hospital; Hamilton Health Sciences; McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Impact factor; MEDLINE; Medicine; Descriptive statistics; Family medicine; Library science; Computer science; Political science; Law; Statistics","score_opus":0.7171569621897869,"score_gpt":0.63058816574139,"score_spread":0.08656879644839688,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2613383989","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2025033,0.7767894,0.0021165735,0.005973695,0.0005908092,0.00201236,0.0074687675,0.0000929227,0.0024521186],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.49762642,0.48497072,0.0048204563,0.0036745332,0.00056925014,0.0027717066,0.005016077,0.00006946854,0.00048129982],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","domain_scores_codex":[0.8696248,0.04189994,0.059417948,0.0052077705,0.022650035,0.0011994126],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.49739197,0.31246856,0.14144288,0.009616641,0.03527056,0.0038093575],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06939385,0.0006534415,0.0032242092,0.02093403,0.0010016738,0.003033513,0.0018718247,0.0016525349,0.0021314856],"category_scores_gemma":[0.3314709,0.0009765411,0.0034980823,0.02574536,0.0017027687,0.0054246094,0.0034794689,0.0014414589,0.00047792128],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007197079,0.0001669965,0.40309006,0.36729708,0.0071483385,0.0011360646,0.012645559,0.0002118031,0.0004343245,0.00075734535,0.012503239,0.19388948],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00042207798,0.00094094843,0.5317985,0.35654032,0.01043943,0.00797989,0.023361158,0.00048502366,0.00046547814,0.0010800777,0.06622046,0.0002666539],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035787926,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0053492533,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99834746,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028466904,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009580514,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36699414},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2613540590","doi":"","title":"Cultural differences regarding expected utilities and costs of plagiarism between high trust- and low-trust-societies: Preliminary results of an international survey study","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Southern Denmark Research Portal (University of Southern Denmark)","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Centre for International Governance Innovation","funders":"","keywords":"Business; World Values Survey; Public relations; Internet privacy; Psychology; Social psychology; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.043798957141229874,"score_gpt":0.28793216469859617,"score_spread":0.24413320755736628,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2613540590","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99914885,0.000033718195,0.000049884948,0.000029988954,0.0000012211822,0.000004100961,0.000060886734,6.383686e-7,0.00067070744],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99978834,0.000020086643,0.00003794279,0.0000052871897,9.2495355e-7,0.0000022606332,0.000040407114,7.7045513e-7,0.00010403035],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977673,0.000998771,0.00034114457,0.00015054701,0.00041669887,0.0003256002],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9639737,0.0150171295,0.012817318,0.0017495379,0.0032631196,0.0031791825],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00323144,0.00016997497,0.00023665174,0.0013499921,0.0007014157,0.0014108481,0.00036816314,0.0004178217,0.0028509356],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02565839,0.00025657186,0.00042003434,0.0014267021,0.0008614566,0.0010726915,0.0009861732,0.0007225127,0.00026017058],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000107913474,0.00009352832,0.9898224,0.000014206206,0.000054264066,0.000049084687,0.0065314565,0.00008367171,0.00008737333,0.000120473014,0.00006541926,0.0029702822],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000045779298,0.00008826611,0.9899441,0.000009449286,0.000018057555,0.00010420134,0.009278353,0.00021341859,0.00007639989,0.00007929072,0.0001741998,0.0000096965805],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009845853,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011139101,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9995822,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006881718,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00046862816,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.019577086},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2614545665","doi":"10.1101/139063","title":"Modeling science trustworthiness under publish or perish pressure","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Trustworthiness; Incentive; Publish or perish; Diligence; Publication; Value (mathematics); Psychology; Research integrity; Political science; Public relations; Computer science; Social psychology; Publishing; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.03795160571044067,"score_gpt":0.2917620869855767,"score_spread":0.25381048127513606,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2614545665","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.84276044,0.0005254604,0.119391,0.012303264,0.00013184943,0.0005060573,0.0007031966,0.00019842954,0.0234803],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99295145,0.0001622502,0.003913804,0.00013487443,0.000048654685,0.00010600276,0.000077759156,0.000018809105,0.002586351],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9932353,0.0039580856,0.0002530806,0.0011636938,0.0006114518,0.0007784502],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.87467104,0.08957622,0.019960076,0.006572744,0.004886811,0.004333151],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01759542,0.00093227485,0.0011489546,0.0023142057,0.0022052987,0.005736444,0.002356938,0.0042138426,0.008793619],"category_scores_gemma":[0.12494957,0.00085683214,0.0010556721,0.001445956,0.0062201954,0.0052744797,0.004019102,0.0027200773,0.0010684498],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00090513425,0.0006253219,0.09359413,0.00029631628,0.0003081941,0.0012194802,0.005130708,0.43481517,0.0017045947,0.43261796,0.0047165905,0.024066435],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018282016,0.0004504666,0.013080729,0.00010349632,0.00013481727,0.00027460186,0.0013979335,0.7358999,0.0003647458,0.24527726,0.0027301346,0.00010299525],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013035807,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006004398,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99578613,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0065839062,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031680039,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09305459},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2614821346","doi":"","title":"Evidence Summary: The Launch of a Joint Library/Writing Centre Online Course on Academic Integrity","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Mount Royal University Institutional Repository (Mount Royal University)","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Mount Royal University","funders":"","keywords":"Course (navigation); Academic integrity; Joint (building); Computer science; Aeronautics; Political science; Engineering; Library science; Architectural engineering","score_opus":0.0279143789685282,"score_gpt":0.23785488227669357,"score_spread":0.20994050330816538,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2614821346","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03411204,0.68912035,0.0022199478,0.20283352,0.0106688505,0.0017727744,0.010446753,0.00013623323,0.048689533],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3708965,0.5055135,0.004119578,0.10025992,0.007865794,0.0015087626,0.0036377583,0.00013834651,0.0060598236],"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.93353164,0.035732415,0.010833286,0.004053719,0.013950788,0.0018981784],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.406562,0.46535406,0.06415253,0.0079735285,0.047695745,0.008262283],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.046472985,0.00085756445,0.0015762451,0.003141532,0.0019012964,0.005661422,0.004425864,0.008433532,0.036272317],"category_scores_gemma":[0.34609517,0.00086578587,0.0045227217,0.005166871,0.0030222938,0.0052326606,0.0041689873,0.009574816,0.0039422484],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.008772872,0.000565836,0.050274834,0.39407712,0.015057123,0.0006318289,0.0026798681,0.00034960321,0.00023409215,0.0092355255,0.15997209,0.35814926],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0045617125,0.0024222105,0.13595511,0.55475163,0.03479196,0.0007593872,0.008083188,0.00036610969,0.0009251614,0.006297421,0.2508795,0.00020660977],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020488484,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.034228195,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9915665,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0076581305,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.023245802,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24577558},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2620664699","doi":"10.1017/cjn.2017.84","title":"C.06 Retraction of scientific publications in neurosurgery","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences Neurologiques","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Systems, Applications & Products in Data Processing (Canada); Toronto Public Health","funders":"","keywords":"Impact factor; Neurosurgery; MEDLINE; Medicine; Data extraction; Misattribution of memory; Scientific misconduct; Family medicine; Alternative medicine; Surgery; Political science; Psychiatry; Pathology; Law","score_opus":0.0743255195744261,"score_gpt":0.32388761057128634,"score_spread":0.24956209099686025,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2620664699","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.028197065,0.67729396,0.004901037,0.08062837,0.030911116,0.0021578192,0.013015281,0.00074669765,0.16214865],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.27833605,0.59805137,0.019031534,0.03077677,0.0213251,0.0032783449,0.010738038,0.0007252594,0.03773764],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.8775824,0.049059123,0.03378517,0.00457541,0.03229163,0.0027062711],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.5339484,0.20914134,0.12227348,0.02600607,0.09793216,0.010698576],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.063805595,0.0009952058,0.0014678689,0.021684114,0.0032608295,0.010990637,0.0027145103,0.0034788207,0.044771012],"category_scores_gemma":[0.31179306,0.0007950705,0.0027462363,0.028483074,0.0047412873,0.0075060604,0.0042413734,0.0022674191,0.01760029],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008400048,0.00009978301,0.031797055,0.13328391,0.0009238895,0.0018616293,0.0035221835,0.0002307061,0.00110775,0.017446343,0.25327215,0.5556146],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015131691,0.00023622916,0.03377261,0.10119343,0.000603364,0.005399416,0.0026822917,0.00025246304,0.0011112082,0.0064583705,0.8480278,0.000111504734],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004818047,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0034403692,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9965212,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0072221677,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.023952568,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33744025},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"systematic_review","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"systematic_review","genre":"review","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2620666811","doi":"10.1111/anae.13938","title":"Data fabrication and other reasons for non‐random sampling in 5087 randomised, controlled trials in anaesthetic and general medical journals","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Anaesthesia","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":228,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Anesthesiology; Clinical trial; Randomized controlled trial; Confidence interval; Family medicine; Anesthesia; Surgery; Internal medicine","score_opus":0.13969656512959383,"score_gpt":0.4244541306113014,"score_spread":0.28475756548170755,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2620666811","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":"methods","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08438672,0.074198484,0.37279162,0.051083233,0.03560898,0.2723128,0.066754796,0.0037682133,0.03909513],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.28644568,0.0066950736,0.24187024,0.024321124,0.0030397156,0.4181502,0.008743272,0.0013257511,0.009408989],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.08507345,0.65627253,0.18181369,0.019553484,0.054838542,0.0024482424],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.04456638,0.7440908,0.0783477,0.10798435,0.02430999,0.0007007983],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_broad","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.6598616,0.0030614207,0.00805233,0.013973458,0.002322442,0.009063188,0.005808218,0.008254065,0.024683634],"category_scores_gemma":[0.89329755,0.00398674,0.010794649,0.024275107,0.010297113,0.0057113394,0.0059590633,0.0076390645,0.0070721386],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.03805336,0.0009045805,0.062493697,0.13075523,0.021475164,0.0031082314,0.018587936,0.008956364,0.0024393345,0.11757608,0.21652111,0.379129],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.029935213,0.006630257,0.10740697,0.14657043,0.012656136,0.0040999255,0.003038953,0.028039036,0.009969094,0.14872608,0.50143695,0.0014909927],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013894963,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013024154,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99194765,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008237913,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0072920006,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41945124},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2623025047","doi":"","title":"Accidental Plagiarism in Higher Education, Part II","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"AUSpace (Athabasca University)","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Paraphrase; Accidental; Citation; Psychology; Mathematics education; Perception; Higher education; Pedagogy; Social psychology; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.01852048591483077,"score_gpt":0.2506582751077896,"score_spread":0.23213778919295883,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2623025047","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93552494,0.0127504915,0.0017841688,0.0035622122,0.00015048428,0.00010652753,0.00058475987,0.00006644805,0.04546995],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99314356,0.0026586703,0.0005401659,0.00020550206,0.00005170499,0.000017500188,0.00019086736,0.000005789394,0.003186199],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9935175,0.0014449727,0.000674034,0.00044971937,0.0033535913,0.0005601814],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9718972,0.009975667,0.0066527603,0.0019645493,0.008213492,0.0012962989],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0045336927,0.00022747544,0.00026244565,0.005037122,0.0024543689,0.004346346,0.000555133,0.00061625574,0.004747227],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022471294,0.00015018914,0.00025456163,0.0053414144,0.002179121,0.0021984589,0.0019578778,0.00080961775,0.00059263624],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009452502,0.00016202035,0.6555868,0.0012825038,0.00006469708,0.0003819005,0.03647246,0.0003773058,0.0016520025,0.004997668,0.006599873,0.2923282],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000037510642,0.000114995724,0.9656113,0.00046616106,0.000024225215,0.00040692533,0.013365786,0.00025240413,0.0015980053,0.0014554835,0.016678315,0.000022829392],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.036427923,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0469761,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99938375,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004838475,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0043859147,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07243174},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2729321853","doi":"10.1152/advan.00103.2016","title":"Cheating after the test: who does it and how often?","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"AJP Advances in Physiology Education","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Cheating; Commit; Test (biology); Misconduct; Psychology; Academic dishonesty; Academic integrity; Educational measurement; Medical education; Medicine; Social psychology; Curriculum; Computer science; Pedagogy","score_opus":0.00971868359661919,"score_gpt":0.340190351939351,"score_spread":0.3304716683427318,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2729321853","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98787814,0.0044255652,0.00088938785,0.0032738866,0.000121065386,0.000050232706,0.0003196247,0.00002873573,0.0030133245],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9953532,0.0023134386,0.0006870838,0.00056501076,0.000111141046,0.00003113262,0.00021283807,0.000018787383,0.0007072816],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99261236,0.002901859,0.0013027672,0.00078586553,0.0017828629,0.0006142734],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96437275,0.009528139,0.018668536,0.0010425544,0.0044655586,0.0019225251],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0081945,0.000335629,0.00062245387,0.0030411961,0.000831136,0.0024426326,0.0011435176,0.0012839822,0.001988904],"category_scores_gemma":[0.037791148,0.00037707743,0.0005502656,0.002350646,0.0014393596,0.002583058,0.0011665757,0.0014069512,0.0011636418],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000045202498,0.000050870203,0.9768138,0.00006033041,0.00002939899,0.000078545185,0.0009496684,0.000016164504,0.00008999944,0.00005082297,0.0011844586,0.020630714],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004222534,0.00014274385,0.98971283,0.00027276017,0.00004719127,0.0009519749,0.0063854232,0.00037466295,0.00024125376,0.00022809056,0.0016100573,0.000028673852],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0064750714,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011406106,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.998716,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009447897,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007748588,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.043337226},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2738756398","doi":"10.3138/jvme.0816-126r2","title":"Using a Modified Bookmark Procedure to Help Identify Reasonable Consequences for Academic Integrity Violations","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Veterinary Medical Education","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Misconduct; Sanctions; Variety (cybernetics); Psychology; Academic integrity; Compliance (psychology); Variation (astronomy); Research integrity; Computer science; Medical education; Applied psychology; Political science; Public relations; Social psychology; Law; Medicine; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.24550936306463003,"score_gpt":0.5075909073258358,"score_spread":0.2620815442612058,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2738756398","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2103668,0.00043784766,0.6568793,0.0025426093,0.0015116638,0.034014173,0.0064984206,0.005406673,0.08234258],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1861052,0.0002724147,0.76344377,0.0008631743,0.00016954157,0.03418294,0.0016163018,0.00048778983,0.012858717],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9566827,0.020466866,0.0096964715,0.002758978,0.009139683,0.0012552865],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.80031925,0.1305361,0.022311129,0.018236917,0.027065927,0.0015306373],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.036735013,0.0012801229,0.0011413047,0.0082247555,0.002744903,0.002967557,0.002418713,0.0025586684,0.023347724],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1631375,0.00061239087,0.0015849944,0.0050261384,0.002556401,0.0041893795,0.003119596,0.0035444028,0.0062671998],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0019942427,0.0024274597,0.109695464,0.001990192,0.00025733194,0.0012668805,0.012027946,0.002541005,0.017038194,0.0938508,0.06783908,0.68907136],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00067967613,0.00625447,0.41499883,0.0018244558,0.00034547414,0.0050194124,0.021595957,0.049812485,0.077378936,0.15438516,0.2661508,0.0015543128],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019071656,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006185009,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99744135,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020201558,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0039313645,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19427562},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2741870589","doi":"10.5539/ies.v10n8p40","title":"Why Do College Students Cheat? A Structural Equation Modeling Validation of the Theory of Planned Behavior","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Education Studies","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cheating; Theory of planned behavior; Structural equation modeling; Psychology; Variance (accounting); Test (biology); Sample (material); Social psychology; Academic dishonesty; Mathematics education; Control (management); Statistics; Mathematics; Computer science","score_opus":0.12057075620960946,"score_gpt":0.45223663055131247,"score_spread":0.331665874341703,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2741870589","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99561113,0.00003708785,0.0031030672,0.00040125818,0.000015596639,0.00016945702,0.00009770601,0.000014939441,0.00054987945],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962471,0.000051423245,0.0031016476,0.000055848795,0.000009103511,0.00021367095,0.00013556906,0.0000033935357,0.00018222257],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973907,0.0018155976,0.00014568675,0.00022516961,0.0002870049,0.00013595735],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98748314,0.008813469,0.0017452682,0.0008191594,0.0008720272,0.00026686434],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0064713145,0.00043284745,0.00061513815,0.00073653733,0.00071349915,0.0010145633,0.00061265967,0.000594822,0.0015346169],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018274352,0.0004016001,0.0011851923,0.0006987096,0.00075876404,0.0007600572,0.00063298846,0.0016789584,0.00017238292],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022200144,0.0009468426,0.9660126,0.00007817577,0.0003476204,0.00007007136,0.004230437,0.0021913587,0.0005027204,0.0021215721,0.000453661,0.022822976],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022488821,0.001954448,0.90377724,0.00017676408,0.00046859577,0.00012200077,0.0034515793,0.082128316,0.00074996776,0.005489867,0.0014060755,0.00005022128],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010463298,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008802647,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9994052,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009596802,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018850807,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.034224033},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2744776047","doi":"10.1080/0309877x.2017.1359504","title":"Literature reviews, citations and intertextuality in graduate student writing","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Further and Higher Education","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","keywords":"Intertextuality; Citation; Rhetorical question; Academic dishonesty; Sociology; Focus (optics); Academic writing; Pedagogy; Psychology; Linguistics; Computer science; Cheating","score_opus":0.08787646325849159,"score_gpt":0.4380383426637672,"score_spread":0.3501618794052756,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2744776047","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"reporting","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"reporting","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5643778,0.08390661,0.08848044,0.0554141,0.002587997,0.0014302401,0.0005830887,0.0006838404,0.20253588],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9299642,0.021128412,0.03024452,0.0020222473,0.0012358367,0.0009879274,0.00024362326,0.00027391742,0.013899252],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.849331,0.10693857,0.013021292,0.005392465,0.023670435,0.0016462322],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.44164702,0.45277092,0.05698629,0.01917112,0.025931317,0.0034933423],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06959148,0.00039921785,0.000998899,0.01857469,0.006586158,0.02012021,0.0018023453,0.002280353,0.0045440146],"category_scores_gemma":[0.33943006,0.00063466723,0.0006500884,0.025102621,0.015483565,0.015680604,0.009189816,0.003113867,0.0014101765],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012577718,0.000096943324,0.026056321,0.003851042,0.000118350596,0.0009037917,0.5429877,0.00027342624,0.0012150635,0.11212628,0.0077774157,0.3044679],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000061478706,0.0002743077,0.06236152,0.011279979,0.00016533148,0.0038950439,0.30761373,0.0011674482,0.0029632554,0.24068856,0.36932233,0.00020700679],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010704634,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018010725,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93040854,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004903209,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007939564,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3680393},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2746226332","doi":"10.5539/hes.v7n3p161","title":"A Review of Literature: Plagiarism in the Papers of Turkish Context","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Higher Education Studies","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Turkish; Context (archaeology); Perception; Psychology; Graduate students; Content analysis; Pedagogy; Sociology; Social science; Geography; Linguistics","score_opus":0.20295284461317314,"score_gpt":0.5003978328777278,"score_spread":0.2974449882645546,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2746226332","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0004908796,0.9986059,0.00004694792,0.00028896856,0.0001196251,0.00000982887,0.00003307139,0.0000027505205,0.00040193737],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.005278454,0.9940493,0.00016409869,0.00024941153,0.00010317152,0.00001722966,0.000037857368,0.0000022932252,0.00009821046],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961565,0.0011594986,0.0011509352,0.00036199158,0.0010245449,0.00014650216],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97874695,0.015040211,0.0032824802,0.0003574372,0.0023228682,0.00025009646],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039194766,0.0010103085,0.0019357797,0.018979013,0.0013713738,0.0036603317,0.0011757072,0.0018152006,0.0041729663],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019802516,0.00060427433,0.0016541273,0.016980708,0.0016905272,0.0039536096,0.0015166381,0.0012164222,0.0005441378],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012395998,0.000046930832,0.002406529,0.4111656,0.00075391715,0.0009391772,0.0039456403,0.00016410476,0.00067324156,0.0037548963,0.018877931,0.55714804],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000035294946,0.00014267256,0.016409356,0.52531385,0.00341926,0.005807763,0.0062800543,0.00007086776,0.0004757644,0.0029351318,0.4390319,0.00007808684],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038970304,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010187116,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9981848,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024090663,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007580699,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.020728469},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2747279489","doi":"10.19173/irrodl.v18i5.3103","title":"Using Learning Analytics for Preserving Academic Integrity","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":61,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Learning analytics; Academic integrity; Computer science; Baseline (sea); Analytics; Data integrity; Accountability; Class (philosophy); Process (computing); Data science; Artificial intelligence; Machine learning; Database","score_opus":0.38356790077370195,"score_gpt":0.5714244209153055,"score_spread":0.1878565201416036,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2747279489","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11834648,0.0013928793,0.8251047,0.011279779,0.0003288871,0.0005709119,0.00055694795,0.0094723785,0.032946955],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7913452,0.00063861866,0.20166415,0.00052509655,0.00018647268,0.00018583977,0.00061873614,0.0002631728,0.0045726346],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9856904,0.0071789077,0.00064882933,0.0012078427,0.0047561973,0.00051783404],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95070106,0.024682557,0.0060104546,0.009548699,0.007847545,0.0012095938],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009697612,0.0008337073,0.00061779213,0.0037020592,0.001333763,0.00818323,0.00198988,0.0013718049,0.00429998],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04815056,0.00022855592,0.00055683596,0.0027370385,0.0028070363,0.009556483,0.0059028226,0.0025590982,0.0023376867],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00030661628,0.00053853233,0.015965754,0.00046075045,0.000078042365,0.00017379966,0.0030620731,0.015350227,0.0057834466,0.056500427,0.009351696,0.89242864],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011007466,0.0006395655,0.011881099,0.0008880945,0.00011954361,0.00053968694,0.005835349,0.45466778,0.08050219,0.35361877,0.0909535,0.00024435797],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011059527,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001093979,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9986282,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015933827,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032211398,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05128652},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2749837437","doi":"10.1097/mej.0000000000000491","title":"A systematic review of retracted publications in emergency medicine","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"European Journal of Emergency Medicine","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":48,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Hotel Dieu Hospital","funders":"","keywords":"MEDLINE; Web of science; Impact factor; Scientific misconduct; Medicine; Library science; Alternative medicine; Family medicine; Meta-analysis; Computer science; Political science; Pathology; Law","score_opus":0.2404835463844387,"score_gpt":0.4691043373144579,"score_spread":0.2286207909300192,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2749837437","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002526034,0.99556535,0.00022260005,0.00029077742,0.00019626503,0.0005720325,0.00036050362,0.0000075094495,0.00025889275],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.038257938,0.955561,0.0021458494,0.0011593418,0.00031719104,0.0017662095,0.0006042,0.000015248751,0.00017314524],"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","domain_scores_codex":[0.9106821,0.037073057,0.037563603,0.0032848236,0.010356923,0.0010395629],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.735105,0.18992092,0.051207557,0.004130787,0.018120073,0.0015157338],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.044370335,0.0021655394,0.011523315,0.033721138,0.0013747757,0.0050073187,0.0029821696,0.002920767,0.0051512932],"category_scores_gemma":[0.19605495,0.0015072295,0.010367809,0.028009105,0.0017678711,0.005943489,0.0031535667,0.0020721792,0.00057494367],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":"systematic_review","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027283354,0.000023590266,0.0015642117,0.9616816,0.011069192,0.00018376895,0.0004024552,0.000048996008,0.0000894878,0.00012122986,0.0009503478,0.023592401],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004437158,0.00033626615,0.0074534896,0.91519904,0.05951124,0.00081613235,0.0007027654,0.00007269222,0.00019548257,0.00031479183,0.014906113,0.000048303817],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036207442,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011946719,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99707925,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005206529,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016854892,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23465556},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2751819158","doi":"10.1145/3098279.3098568","title":"Assessing the usability of smartwatches for academic cheating during exams","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Cheating; Smartwatch; Usability; Wearable computer; Computer science; Internet privacy; Psychology; Human–computer interaction; Applied psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.1095055098366186,"score_gpt":0.4288213625561918,"score_spread":0.3193158527195732,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2751819158","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9969363,0.00008303825,0.0012389395,0.00006544766,0.000012089249,0.000115601506,0.00003328628,0.000037372985,0.0014778603],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99670345,0.00008802949,0.0020711888,0.000050373168,0.000012011895,0.00011889361,0.000049705654,0.000010898098,0.0008955345],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99304307,0.0036295794,0.0008357974,0.0005770908,0.001508399,0.00040609317],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94073635,0.037048653,0.010575711,0.0039958167,0.005575687,0.0020677997],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007859261,0.0006191216,0.00063938514,0.0010924855,0.0006926222,0.002160515,0.0006835864,0.0011108991,0.0033945213],"category_scores_gemma":[0.056672957,0.000277382,0.000690863,0.00047141494,0.00064772717,0.0013436793,0.0009956183,0.0008226944,0.0009016387],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0027542717,0.007896756,0.7339488,0.0013840073,0.00039469602,0.00044092516,0.0305862,0.001151699,0.032057457,0.0007770166,0.0022652112,0.18634292],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017325373,0.015981916,0.9295228,0.00040798954,0.00033818863,0.0006234925,0.018563095,0.0075431624,0.019994417,0.0007687476,0.0059027453,0.0001801894],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00040119104,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005630047,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9988891,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003144011,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00042303544,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.041564226},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2753487506","doi":"10.1017/s1062798717000229","title":"No, Prime Minister: PhD Plagiarism of High Level Public Officials","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Review","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Université de Montréal; Commonwealth of Massachusetts","keywords":"Dictatorship; Authoritarianism; Prime minister; Democracy; Politics; Political science; Nationalism; Language change; German; Political culture; Law; State (computer science); Romanian; Political economy; Sociology; Economic history; History","score_opus":0.1689703419926334,"score_gpt":0.35765168311427004,"score_spread":0.18868134112163665,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2753487506","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22538935,0.31417617,0.0076546464,0.059793454,0.004503026,0.0004977154,0.0009647374,0.0003045714,0.38671637],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90801847,0.03486001,0.0009814785,0.0043114685,0.00095246884,0.00015485307,0.00034043205,0.00004813062,0.05033275],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99181515,0.0043007643,0.00057865656,0.0006335801,0.0018408197,0.0008310691],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98703593,0.005610578,0.0034116313,0.0010106666,0.0019538947,0.0009772046],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0077959355,0.0002701905,0.0004464056,0.0021018952,0.0034362013,0.0030709624,0.00066173624,0.0015719741,0.0107051395],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022887174,0.00019052882,0.00029351749,0.0038754812,0.0023097785,0.0022615455,0.0024599687,0.0012922734,0.002709272],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007347222,0.00025860258,0.03693663,0.015793324,0.00017647598,0.002273897,0.060196258,0.0005721814,0.0026956392,0.18948865,0.13520953,0.555664],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000059058148,0.00024380234,0.038491476,0.0019563995,0.000067813125,0.0017947874,0.011632469,0.000100488316,0.0021089728,0.0064176177,0.9370975,0.000029586508],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018480371,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002994666,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99842805,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027809462,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0045558345,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.041229308},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["research_integrity"],"domain":null,"study_design":"qualitative","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["research_integrity"],"domain":null,"study_design":"qualitative","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W2757393902","doi":"10.5465/amp.2015.0167","title":"Reflections on Scientific Misconduct in Management: Unfortunate Incidents or a Normative Crisis?","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Academy of Management Perspectives","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":46,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; University of Toronto; McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Argument (complex analysis); Scholarship; Misconduct; Conformity; Normative; Anticipation (artificial intelligence); Political science; Competition (biology); Ideology; Legitimacy; Perspective (graphical); Sociology; Public relations; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.11701283965169058,"score_gpt":0.4442210726609626,"score_spread":0.32720823300927204,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2757393902","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.038322028,0.0027588005,0.0024929724,0.93998337,0.0033854295,0.00002275009,0.000014433459,0.00005160349,0.012968632],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.79928625,0.003478385,0.0042415773,0.17857926,0.006703669,0.00013023478,0.000020141313,0.00016721839,0.007393362],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.85179436,0.10300727,0.008201802,0.0061527337,0.022133477,0.008710348],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.69468033,0.23743442,0.02235126,0.011792648,0.02584575,0.007895615],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.13693537,0.0006681411,0.00096841174,0.004517635,0.0322505,0.032525074,0.006761376,0.03195719,0.002485008],"category_scores_gemma":[0.30285215,0.0010134706,0.0010561257,0.0041792286,0.06767962,0.024792025,0.017626181,0.04307319,0.00064583664],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000051799365,0.00007669458,0.0026625688,0.00025845598,0.000030450929,0.004093373,0.5243327,0.00034786086,0.00058177946,0.37612212,0.067651674,0.023790482],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002504465,0.000071897724,0.0013997147,0.0009949066,0.000022617282,0.0019191231,0.51593554,0.00064201886,0.0013164863,0.17231837,0.3052068,0.00014754877],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005092529,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005597158,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9680428,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014196583,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015642555,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.72419214},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2766638518","doi":"10.5539/elt.v10n11p141","title":"Technical and Non-Technical Programme Students’ Attitudes and Reasons for Plagiarism","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"English Language Teaching","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cheating; Psychology; Temptation; Academic integrity; The Internet; Malpractice; Perception; Medical education; Academic dishonesty; Likert scale; Higher education; Social psychology; Public relations; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.019495425566117833,"score_gpt":0.35975979661247054,"score_spread":0.3402643710463527,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2766638518","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99865,0.00005329948,0.000057518522,0.00010695766,0.0000043868404,0.000011236375,0.000012642953,0.0000030098086,0.0011009391],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99766976,0.00012356331,0.000068062414,0.00008199721,0.000010729486,0.000013843762,0.00002380309,0.0000024825279,0.0020057666],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.997471,0.0005560385,0.00025344917,0.00017107332,0.0011664401,0.00038211554],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98187006,0.0049779722,0.006096011,0.00073828833,0.0028193595,0.0034983952],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029416895,0.00026249146,0.00038856585,0.0018813459,0.0011783105,0.0027826854,0.00043025718,0.0010368243,0.0043853065],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014658708,0.0002459888,0.00054848,0.0012021111,0.0012168428,0.0013712203,0.0014901182,0.0012746382,0.0011980131],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001973973,0.0010864739,0.91239965,0.00013809628,0.000041786236,0.00035310458,0.049341187,0.00010594885,0.0018898685,0.0004053108,0.00055469037,0.03348641],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001113435,0.0011624641,0.9306511,0.00006910367,0.000029978915,0.00048596377,0.0628922,0.00028465185,0.0009942694,0.000290435,0.0030837036,0.000044976907],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015795061,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002443753,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9989632,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00072881504,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010084996,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.015557289},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2767748721","doi":"10.48550/arxiv.1711.02149","title":"Detecting Disguised Plagiarism","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"arXiv (Cornell University)","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Plagiarism detection; Computer science; Source code; Preprocessor; Set (abstract data type); Code (set theory); Programming language; Information retrieval; Software engineering; Natural language processing","score_opus":0.10666766742685853,"score_gpt":0.2394823423565825,"score_spread":0.13281467492972399,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2767748721","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.48066154,0.0015221199,0.47151607,0.0018919058,0.00033110665,0.00096065155,0.0021823396,0.025404312,0.015529914],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.746062,0.0004201227,0.24393418,0.0002950494,0.00011780172,0.00023921885,0.0020379059,0.001939244,0.0049544442],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9900232,0.0018633719,0.00081746804,0.0020162722,0.00488663,0.0003930333],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.90975034,0.030418416,0.017948968,0.020884803,0.019684412,0.0013129846],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006170237,0.0009254364,0.0008868952,0.008186621,0.0014391176,0.0025285413,0.0017932131,0.0016641318,0.003238916],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08602493,0.0006386026,0.00065996393,0.004047991,0.0022361279,0.004144145,0.0027135024,0.002273147,0.0018011137],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009365402,0.00038439143,0.13405561,0.0021129567,0.00037548487,0.0020051028,0.008137936,0.0071114358,0.14935043,0.0366072,0.01909893,0.639824],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015667842,0.001149788,0.14941719,0.00078133435,0.00047637732,0.005489963,0.0028786962,0.17773734,0.4881725,0.073698804,0.099556714,0.00048457462],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013072442,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021313578,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9983359,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011127489,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017977718,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.032631755},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["research_integrity"],"domain":null,"study_design":"simulation_or_modeling","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["research_integrity"],"domain":null,"study_design":"simulation_or_modeling","genre":"methods","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W2773728013","doi":"10.1111/1911-3838.12154","title":"From Plagiarism‐Plagued to Plagiarism‐Proof: Using Anonymized Case Assignments in Intermediate Accounting","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Accounting Perspectives","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Rationalization (economics); Misconduct; Academic integrity; Computer science; Cheating; Mathematics education; Psychology; Accounting; Business; Political science; Social psychology; Library science; Law","score_opus":0.03570606692757128,"score_gpt":0.3614844814002403,"score_spread":0.32577841447266903,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2773728013","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9722339,0.00007188819,0.018868897,0.0009916603,0.00005273516,0.00044378606,0.000026232028,0.00022737277,0.00708352],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9836227,0.00005695464,0.014764072,0.00016602327,0.000016927526,0.00016866701,0.000020805493,0.000031856773,0.0011519662],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.945228,0.04543895,0.0019504854,0.0021997492,0.0041346634,0.0010481759],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7857079,0.15904483,0.021157146,0.02149968,0.008331644,0.004258778],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.029710349,0.00042787814,0.00032465832,0.0018520666,0.004180985,0.0073658153,0.0018144569,0.0012479306,0.003198817],"category_scores_gemma":[0.15465783,0.0005020763,0.00030139118,0.0010724146,0.0051742904,0.005028063,0.006143004,0.0026573264,0.00068153546],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0019685715,0.007103964,0.06266501,0.00065664056,0.0001103339,0.002758245,0.31472066,0.0071967705,0.016347665,0.026472,0.0053603207,0.5546399],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010741305,0.0181375,0.16224384,0.0039362637,0.00039179192,0.007828593,0.3019708,0.094669536,0.14315897,0.11304747,0.15212412,0.001417025],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000743637,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016196179,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99875206,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027370034,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022047993,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15712523},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"methods","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["research_integrity"],"domain":null,"study_design":"design_other","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2775823506","doi":"10.7202/1042258ar","title":"Le côté sombre de la science","year":2017,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue de psychoéducation","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03188795566958519,"score_gpt":0.3942464628285499,"score_spread":0.3623585071589647,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2775823506","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.039481062,0.037816245,0.0058719027,0.37300208,0.021375496,0.00008592356,0.00062864734,0.00028104713,0.5214576],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5323116,0.015066975,0.0025929993,0.03182349,0.0089789545,0.00010304416,0.00022810647,0.00040042258,0.40849435],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99606836,0.001641762,0.00019840262,0.00052906404,0.0012663973,0.00029595697],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9849242,0.008446593,0.0017119698,0.0011502438,0.0028277908,0.00093922834],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025793063,0.00047506936,0.0003357281,0.002368311,0.0070913606,0.010494844,0.00071165035,0.003202611,0.023654873],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020442087,0.00028668865,0.00032065177,0.0018283806,0.013658944,0.006513505,0.0030285777,0.0060653305,0.00477481],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014317733,0.000021845168,0.002077594,0.00043463142,0.00002623839,0.0006460124,0.044048194,0.0001065674,0.0015580314,0.65992385,0.244899,0.04611481],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000047678755,0.000016598091,0.0014731084,0.00029057238,0.000004502302,0.00023178828,0.0046631815,0.000063195395,0.00047536762,0.013662408,0.9791023,0.000012152101],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009933951,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01585265,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9967974,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0068192,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0050780685,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07913345},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2777132493","doi":"10.5539/jel.v7n1p281","title":"The Relationship between the Values of Primary School and Music Teacher Candidates and Their Cheating Attitudes","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Education and Learning","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cheating; Psychology; Hedonism; Value (mathematics); Music education; Conformity; Multivariate analysis of variance; Test (biology); Mathematics education; Social psychology; Pedagogy; Statistics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.05813669830240915,"score_gpt":0.3585001833816896,"score_spread":0.30036348507928046,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2777132493","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9990709,0.000024968407,0.00002589202,0.000026064752,0.0000023192342,0.0000032748735,0.00000790622,5.8875673e-7,0.00083811267],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99956435,0.000024499554,0.00002230631,0.000006610689,0.000002803673,0.0000026678615,0.000014151062,4.439741e-7,0.00036216265],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992798,0.00016801052,0.0000500487,0.00005478588,0.00027643167,0.00017093221],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9927776,0.0017935564,0.0027409254,0.00025244962,0.0008128974,0.0016225327],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007367083,0.00015288856,0.00018618225,0.00065542327,0.0006645689,0.0010606701,0.00014687487,0.00031823642,0.0034037235],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0045493348,0.00012813482,0.0002442978,0.0003735468,0.00052272907,0.00021004045,0.0004453188,0.0006833008,0.0002748975],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009290684,0.00025021867,0.98927516,0.000020340836,0.000026912254,0.00021538028,0.0033955518,0.000025840369,0.0007784071,0.00010859383,0.0001100549,0.00570055],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000022493234,0.00010771285,0.9938089,0.0000066541293,0.000006031357,0.00015578546,0.0054012616,0.000056471818,0.00013045504,0.000033792683,0.00028598076,0.0000046886817],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016692518,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029269657,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9996818,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002933762,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000355875,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.011386573},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2782830987","doi":"10.2147/jmdh.s151745","title":"Exploring the characteristics, global distribution and reasons for retraction of published articles involving human research participants: a literature survey","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University; St. Joseph’s Healthcare Hamilton; Impact; Programs for Assessment of Technology in Health Research Institute","funders":"","keywords":"Scientific misconduct; Misconduct; Human research; Medicine; Research integrity; Research ethics; Psychology; Alternative medicine; Political science; Law; Pathology; Psychiatry; Public relations","score_opus":0.3137519640706948,"score_gpt":0.47320960417727975,"score_spread":0.15945764010658497,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2782830987","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6742171,0.28979564,0.0028478503,0.014411608,0.00058882823,0.001576649,0.008494991,0.00010518849,0.007962133],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.81215686,0.16693555,0.0059192874,0.004983102,0.0006995539,0.0024614106,0.0055208355,0.00010891399,0.0012145074],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","domain_scores_codex":[0.91239053,0.027853455,0.035721358,0.0049703238,0.017464578,0.0015997586],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.4696175,0.3080206,0.15839724,0.007072486,0.051404927,0.0054872795],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.078954615,0.0005580611,0.001661681,0.03539435,0.0019071365,0.0042088977,0.0024106668,0.0021755032,0.0038247707],"category_scores_gemma":[0.30609947,0.00084267004,0.0022405272,0.029727137,0.0026018969,0.011121514,0.0035374728,0.0015616094,0.0014372694],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00057645136,0.00026118394,0.6189794,0.07983874,0.0017507982,0.0019094881,0.050790314,0.00017987995,0.0007546064,0.0015547291,0.016186545,0.2272179],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010778115,0.0006076278,0.76068276,0.07935508,0.0012797052,0.007842764,0.08881983,0.0004117866,0.000647082,0.0013012375,0.058679428,0.00026485714],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002865041,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0040489812,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9978245,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003451348,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0072559877,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41755688},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","research_integrity"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"design_other","genre":"review","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2791533172","doi":"10.5430/bmr.v7n1p35","title":"Improving Business Student Writing – A Ten-Step Model","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Business and Management Research","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Quality (philosophy); Business model; Computer science; Mathematics education; Public relations; Pedagogy; Sociology; Psychology; Political science; Business; Marketing","score_opus":0.07820716915843846,"score_gpt":0.40633490599771094,"score_spread":0.3281277368392725,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2791533172","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21057294,0.0022021949,0.40918994,0.061882548,0.000655046,0.006462058,0.0004976417,0.0029833342,0.30555436],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.60523766,0.0026480414,0.35407054,0.0033518863,0.000055650577,0.0027955477,0.00036044267,0.00012295472,0.031357247],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9929268,0.0035948374,0.00039405914,0.0006129334,0.0018725289,0.0005988504],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.988672,0.0041284137,0.0009711959,0.0008817383,0.0030015705,0.0023451818],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0077897194,0.0013746232,0.00041870627,0.0022431668,0.00294127,0.005783936,0.0032351788,0.0033299318,0.006505098],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010536451,0.00068073923,0.0011607402,0.0012124614,0.0050109904,0.0052277674,0.0057052877,0.0035459239,0.00312729],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00035238007,0.005609099,0.048877843,0.002647703,0.00021156536,0.0011157258,0.047854755,0.023451578,0.0069830297,0.22373588,0.023468286,0.61569226],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00063260336,0.0090337545,0.05601845,0.004961557,0.0006020091,0.0028705928,0.06979076,0.15436472,0.022575958,0.4034909,0.2750469,0.00061175943],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005391053,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0080893785,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0077897194,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004515576,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02209638,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.041196465},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2791638110","doi":"10.1007/s10459-018-9810-9","title":"Good news, bad news","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"editorial","venue":"Advances in Health Sciences Education","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"News media; Psychology; Advertising; Business","score_opus":0.017302051772698605,"score_gpt":0.4214055966356946,"score_spread":0.404103544862996,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2791638110","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00003206404,0.0031981817,0.000094936506,0.14445418,0.8494171,0.000012321301,0.000037181533,0.0000734863,0.0026805743],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0008028188,0.0038132472,0.00015995516,0.11891041,0.8523088,0.0000264047,0.000040131563,0.00011236835,0.023825876],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98533416,0.0030019078,0.0016766859,0.0016273609,0.00735852,0.0010013954],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9480236,0.021685423,0.0028956488,0.0021852793,0.017708164,0.0075018443],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014374131,0.0025348414,0.00259154,0.0032952419,0.0058442587,0.017235482,0.0032641508,0.021182042,0.030777171],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08616742,0.0010617505,0.0016274987,0.001622841,0.0067117587,0.012029613,0.0031896997,0.035486266,0.019916736],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009862322,0.00000709368,0.000023818015,0.000092837,0.000005046442,0.000042350966,0.000043598346,0.000008200743,0.00002044926,0.00082886236,0.9947001,0.0042177616],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017843411,0.000014847162,0.00012141505,0.00033674305,0.000013677142,0.00010310702,0.00016043102,0.00004455349,0.000051494666,0.0017964392,0.9973226,0.000016991038],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017509183,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004872062,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97881794,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0052494537,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0061425003,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10295993},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2793686016","doi":"10.1111/jnc.14314","title":"Reviewer selection biases editorial decisions on manuscripts","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Neurochemistry","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"RWTH Aachen University","keywords":"Neurochemistry; Variance (accounting); Selection (genetic algorithm); Rank (graph theory); Multivariate statistics; Psychology; Medicine; Computer science; Statistics; Neurology; Psychiatry; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics; Accounting","score_opus":0.060511286664104005,"score_gpt":0.3502823480959228,"score_spread":0.2897710614318188,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2793686016","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15483806,0.1056576,0.16042046,0.14318769,0.29287922,0.057836346,0.011900763,0.009313707,0.06396614],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.66646403,0.01857194,0.14252648,0.048548862,0.06475503,0.03233268,0.0030108732,0.0045037335,0.019286443],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.21458453,0.38626125,0.24096754,0.039732214,0.11393096,0.004523521],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.039966516,0.53058726,0.19029225,0.043582376,0.18830523,0.0072664316],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.6007093,0.0031084763,0.008130417,0.020523982,0.0061477018,0.015070058,0.007001743,0.0055599897,0.017267149],"category_scores_gemma":[0.86621785,0.0033983544,0.005366823,0.014801148,0.008326721,0.008081829,0.0074112774,0.006059687,0.008641167],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.008484052,0.00048743177,0.0773042,0.052219,0.009368355,0.0025137556,0.04416807,0.0015878609,0.008707928,0.00880346,0.46769592,0.31865996],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0051136455,0.0025192183,0.15358421,0.07047665,0.008941789,0.006308214,0.020012408,0.016994447,0.01762176,0.054871473,0.64147264,0.0020835637],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017866438,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035351438,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.39929068,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007123054,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014400415,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49239653},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2794995886","doi":"10.1101/256982","title":"Ethical Shades of Gray: Questionable Research Practices in Health Professions Education","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Australian Government; U.S. Navy; U.S. Department of Defense","keywords":"Scientific misconduct; Psychology; Research ethics; Misconduct; Gray (unit); Medical education; Data collection; Public relations; Medicine; Alternative medicine; Political science; Social science; Sociology; Psychiatry; Law; Pathology","score_opus":0.09381003052914959,"score_gpt":0.42703758821685456,"score_spread":0.33322755768770496,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2794995886","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89210576,0.004530974,0.012285477,0.06635732,0.0005369403,0.000189907,0.00004429124,0.00007730705,0.023872022],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9910295,0.00092847884,0.0020851025,0.0054051997,0.00008500994,0.000053861546,0.000007989673,0.000015364527,0.0003894249],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.8428721,0.12320223,0.0072772973,0.004394335,0.019512583,0.0027414614],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.67663056,0.20757344,0.07634616,0.016487522,0.015352227,0.0076100565],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0705535,0.00038041457,0.00050923927,0.0026976604,0.0076101143,0.007213117,0.0013884864,0.003051381,0.0025457856],"category_scores_gemma":[0.18846707,0.0008188074,0.00052406534,0.0018956539,0.02974319,0.006202641,0.011348626,0.0062011066,0.00029084051],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020848413,0.0004401797,0.25939158,0.0015634617,0.00016408284,0.0014363395,0.54624206,0.00039585185,0.0031066046,0.03609482,0.013265366,0.13769123],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006650558,0.00044241996,0.14096923,0.0064475713,0.00015247878,0.005727617,0.7044093,0.0018233585,0.0028673885,0.07433441,0.062485836,0.00027389973],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003819469,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005445028,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9969486,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0048543666,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00947344,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37312698},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"domain":"methods","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"domain":"methods","study_design":"design_other","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2796757150","doi":"10.7202/1044268ar","title":"Research Ethics and Commercial Drug Development: When Integrity Threatens Profitability","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"BioéthiqueOnline","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"Fonds de Recherche du Québec - Santé","keywords":"Profitability index; Drug development; Drug; Business; Engineering ethics; Pharmacology; Medicine; Engineering; Finance","score_opus":0.2354224896672095,"score_gpt":0.46807209201116534,"score_spread":0.23264960234395585,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2796757150","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13494787,0.006769894,0.023462031,0.6573147,0.0018284083,0.00017654682,0.000020270778,0.00009182077,0.17538851],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9333502,0.0015675141,0.004276737,0.050417926,0.0009382214,0.00011585261,0.0000075811054,0.000050193346,0.009275902],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.8725718,0.09354348,0.003323958,0.0034240698,0.016905617,0.010231074],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.88200855,0.083361275,0.011272042,0.0055476585,0.008519509,0.009290961],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06619715,0.0004701981,0.00085457065,0.0018909853,0.023278324,0.021631084,0.0019422567,0.020132458,0.0027553705],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09484383,0.0005740832,0.0008259117,0.0015324799,0.066291384,0.01623172,0.01503039,0.021370638,0.0007020834],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007899775,0.00014317474,0.004303188,0.00022047422,0.00003155093,0.0100563,0.12768796,0.0003303331,0.0011356447,0.81822866,0.018087953,0.0196958],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006329823,0.000289963,0.002177583,0.0012043742,0.000036188107,0.018568942,0.16909364,0.0012568684,0.0024864464,0.42376637,0.38086143,0.00019493936],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003007165,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003978141,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9798675,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008841779,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017397072,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35008818},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2800079115","doi":"10.11575/prism/5479","title":"Understanding Faculty Perceptions and Approaches to Academic Integrity in a Canadian School of Education","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Open MIND","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Academic integrity; Higher education; Perception; Pedagogy; Mathematics education; Medical education; Engineering ethics; Psychology; Sociology; Political science; Public relations; Medicine; Engineering","score_opus":0.4643860764483272,"score_gpt":0.426219802651638,"score_spread":0.03816627379668919,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2800079115","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98983395,0.00037400244,0.00015417703,0.0031341864,0.000020859941,0.000050584455,0.00004251416,0.0000053302965,0.006384341],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978123,0.0003592776,0.00021237585,0.00045537428,0.000004088716,0.000017560704,0.00002027178,0.0000035932487,0.0011150889],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98272413,0.004710512,0.00060557894,0.000989367,0.0057230676,0.005247351],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9653869,0.008164124,0.0050473455,0.00090074644,0.011144751,0.009356113],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015503815,0.00034695628,0.0006103581,0.003173974,0.04855075,0.0095963,0.0024283817,0.0014459719,0.0026127854],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03541283,0.00059497874,0.00041465988,0.0042290185,0.017090227,0.0038646061,0.007596984,0.0037755554,0.00015869869],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006340285,0.00010404866,0.13742527,0.00008974423,0.000017939145,0.00020632836,0.84294945,0.000061086306,0.00051008945,0.002506853,0.0013907198,0.0146749765],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000035114917,0.000053691096,0.049753312,0.00008858473,0.000009509534,0.000043982793,0.9436329,0.000050461545,0.00016200524,0.00029282644,0.005881531,0.00002760854],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9578971,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98610824,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99855405,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10572309,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.214181,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7670783},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2800434608","doi":"10.1080/10508422.2018.1466301","title":"A Wake-Up Call? Issues With Plagiarism in Transnational Higher Education","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics & Behavior","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Quarter (Canadian coin); Collusion; Work (physics); Plagiarism detection; Higher education; Academic integrity; Psychology; Sociology; Pedagogy; Medical education; Political science; Social psychology; Law; Business; Engineering; Medicine; Computer science; History","score_opus":0.06700317219200898,"score_gpt":0.4109973970169084,"score_spread":0.34399422482489944,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2800434608","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9789508,0.000699823,0.0016312568,0.00979185,0.000052449646,0.000048628513,0.000015440033,0.000040496023,0.008769205],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969119,0.000296406,0.00038108986,0.0008555543,0.000030738844,0.00002016918,0.000006753149,0.0000097585935,0.0014875226],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9489867,0.04010958,0.0026249315,0.0009862898,0.005428191,0.0018642813],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8766219,0.07401687,0.026304422,0.006559942,0.008990755,0.0075060846],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.027963227,0.00033649712,0.0005346804,0.0019055234,0.01126174,0.006829053,0.0012805382,0.0032020207,0.0037491801],"category_scores_gemma":[0.089813225,0.000431175,0.00032994378,0.0022741193,0.008499738,0.0063426713,0.006370971,0.0037859702,0.00068130513],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009667396,0.00008952526,0.053303193,0.00024149031,0.000030401248,0.0013224019,0.89414614,0.00011272889,0.001949375,0.0047197696,0.002045149,0.041943144],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007504794,0.0001698336,0.036738135,0.00031231967,0.000017846178,0.0015883402,0.9351568,0.00040579843,0.0013145338,0.0033200234,0.020896655,0.00007214101],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004228362,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0069335937,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.996798,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0044858176,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0049521853,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14788544},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2801554343","doi":"10.1108/ils-10-2017-0105","title":"Addressing student plagiarism from the library learning commons","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Information and Learning Sciences","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Cheating; Originality; Academic integrity; Commons; Reputation; Best practice; Pedagogy; Psychology; Knowledge management; Engineering ethics; Sociology; Computer science; Political science; Engineering; Creativity","score_opus":0.04724126962542325,"score_gpt":0.34056163589107585,"score_spread":0.2933203662656526,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2801554343","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6667678,0.002614577,0.10254462,0.026873486,0.00023620193,0.0006155444,0.0001450335,0.00081654935,0.1993862],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98289376,0.0005402823,0.00873727,0.00085644965,0.000050847477,0.00017442479,0.000042536754,0.000038790477,0.006665633],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98919404,0.0061220913,0.0006371048,0.0007159248,0.0023416027,0.000989251],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94494665,0.030101059,0.009136128,0.00722424,0.005298739,0.0032932307],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010687448,0.00038615766,0.00046662765,0.0038279623,0.0077395323,0.0120502645,0.0027136072,0.003121186,0.008395549],"category_scores_gemma":[0.042032756,0.00031125435,0.000659257,0.0024085245,0.013125947,0.010142583,0.018265368,0.0037948466,0.0012799456],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014419694,0.0010851877,0.06380031,0.0032549547,0.00006942638,0.0009467653,0.24419212,0.0023019402,0.0039600614,0.28383428,0.005696186,0.3907146],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000059865568,0.0009655674,0.06786557,0.0061547384,0.00017114625,0.0025255296,0.26699477,0.00607904,0.02103304,0.38449293,0.24344708,0.00021071134],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014514073,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002427848,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9968788,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0073431223,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015286037,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.056521356},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["research_integrity"],"domain":null,"study_design":"qualitative","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["research_integrity"],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"commentary","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2804554214","doi":"","title":"Integrity Matters: Foundations for Academic Success","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints)","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Academic integrity; Engineering ethics; Political science; Epistemology; Engineering; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0372327070048306,"score_gpt":0.34861074411443166,"score_spread":0.31137803710960105,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2804554214","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021779131,0.0033136788,0.008600322,0.1661199,0.00096434605,0.0001465882,0.00041713554,0.00023318276,0.79842573],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89588153,0.0034594522,0.003643936,0.0054328158,0.00088219345,0.00014807878,0.00034870554,0.00014411827,0.09005929],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98926497,0.0035504338,0.00050099444,0.0011881865,0.003393914,0.0021014921],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9428556,0.007955382,0.00597226,0.006400405,0.016793307,0.020023137],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01044454,0.0004900449,0.0006696766,0.0029322,0.009925973,0.019251604,0.0013343336,0.0036269978,0.03281835],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04444447,0.00034165036,0.00041162674,0.0027298722,0.02852537,0.00807478,0.01236615,0.0045760423,0.0062233713],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000044545723,0.00007142213,0.007138666,0.00013442397,0.000020350668,0.0002440049,0.008209978,0.00023770738,0.00020847013,0.8284624,0.06839385,0.086834095],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021524047,0.00007131929,0.013473145,0.0005208876,0.000020458727,0.00020475916,0.008460835,0.00036793746,0.00033281805,0.47983274,0.49663422,0.000059321646],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.036454108,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.031956393,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.996373,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012376963,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0326946,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1097883},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2807123811","doi":"10.3138/jsp.49.3.02","title":"Journal Retractions: Some Unique Features of Research Misconduct in China","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Institutes of Health; Northwestern University","keywords":"China; Misconduct; Boom; Scientific misconduct; Research data; Political science; Public relations; Criminology; Law; Sociology; Engineering; Library science; Computer science; Medicine; Subject (documents); Alternative medicine","score_opus":0.09045961053599434,"score_gpt":0.40771585992933085,"score_spread":0.3172562493933365,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2807123811","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97311234,0.0039190715,0.001281198,0.0034834582,0.00022816367,0.00036079792,0.0031199767,0.00011232114,0.014382619],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99381655,0.001590929,0.0010260683,0.0003393085,0.00021954149,0.00017548987,0.0010882897,0.000024072844,0.0017197214],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.97500074,0.0051545883,0.006550478,0.0016306626,0.010140486,0.0015230019],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8136677,0.043299377,0.10477487,0.008589241,0.025655286,0.0040135332],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017677637,0.00040212605,0.0005606779,0.014517824,0.002497185,0.0031115662,0.0010121274,0.0007868209,0.002753838],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07352741,0.00029110294,0.0006207843,0.016725974,0.0019179911,0.0022385037,0.0023465045,0.0009218617,0.00039087556],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023054646,0.00009331822,0.86960924,0.00097257795,0.00015161883,0.0013940115,0.015282207,0.00015352975,0.0005663802,0.0022343164,0.010280091,0.09903222],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001313736,0.000121022946,0.9648415,0.00033232465,0.000100002646,0.00156499,0.012046234,0.00056932884,0.0005943368,0.00089335116,0.018834567,0.00008930832],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005998857,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008486543,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99921316,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026759428,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005484419,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09348941},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["research_integrity"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2807496975","doi":"10.7759/cureus.2698","title":"Combating Scientific Misconduct: The Role of Focused Workshops in Changing Attitudes Towards Plagiarism","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cureus","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Dalhousie University","keywords":"Scientific misconduct; Misconduct; Medicine; Medical education; Test (biology); Descriptive statistics; IBM; Family medicine; Research ethics; Alternative medicine; Psychiatry; Pathology","score_opus":0.03738302534706906,"score_gpt":0.32233824546843215,"score_spread":0.2849552201213631,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2807496975","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99251574,0.0008295578,0.001205662,0.0013159635,0.00007554535,0.0009436521,0.00003596628,0.000070684735,0.0030073216],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98785365,0.001482325,0.0076672733,0.00053373526,0.000076380034,0.001003696,0.00004559221,0.000007504052,0.001329782],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99686027,0.002066012,0.00016389614,0.00019724901,0.00035696922,0.00035560838],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9737726,0.01811251,0.0029512434,0.0005908586,0.0010225696,0.0035501386],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00799725,0.00046160741,0.00040248927,0.0006225268,0.00096115796,0.0011426787,0.001239414,0.00089782645,0.00396474],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024155676,0.00026826866,0.0005256174,0.0003623131,0.00053837773,0.0010908673,0.0016075086,0.0010744603,0.00040764656],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0021961436,0.03762617,0.085260734,0.004026776,0.00023412416,0.00092663994,0.036690492,0.0009535433,0.0070226416,0.00037291538,0.0037138753,0.820976],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002267089,0.08554967,0.78529584,0.006518487,0.000941484,0.0026708432,0.072395496,0.003203062,0.011628103,0.0032936411,0.025973901,0.00026236777],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007277119,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012948125,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9991022,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005824238,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028243058,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.042293966},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["research_integrity"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["research_integrity"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W2807600559","doi":"10.1007/s12144-018-9887-6","title":"Factor structure of the attitudes toward cheating scale: An exploratory structural equation modeling analysis","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Current Psychology","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"Universidade de Macau","keywords":"Cheating; Psychology; Structural equation modeling; Misconduct; Social psychology; Scale (ratio); Exploratory factor analysis; Academic dishonesty; Immorality; Morality; Psychometrics; Statistics; Developmental psychology; Mathematics; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.1441619263154874,"score_gpt":0.4393019605818223,"score_spread":0.2951400342663349,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2807600559","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9905096,0.000030391137,0.0074468027,0.00012955247,0.000015735905,0.00043153507,0.00038985052,0.000044403554,0.001002279],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9903509,0.000037359387,0.0075666187,0.000021939257,0.000010367048,0.00079544174,0.00069912913,0.000030132378,0.00048804213],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99532205,0.0023212205,0.00042567396,0.0004603037,0.0011715712,0.00029909745],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97320086,0.019440815,0.0017293057,0.0016836702,0.0034721924,0.00047312328],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013247882,0.0010050084,0.0010936961,0.0017822532,0.0013467041,0.002351372,0.0009013557,0.00084034906,0.004423749],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0345392,0.00055866153,0.0021952908,0.0019084576,0.0011524635,0.00120508,0.0014393156,0.0021863878,0.00049083563],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007735231,0.0022220907,0.89547026,0.0001703256,0.0007299088,0.00017348846,0.017290927,0.006499229,0.0039307624,0.0048380066,0.0014726535,0.06642872],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001891705,0.0011069648,0.9287475,0.00013852,0.00041004992,0.00012029708,0.0053346395,0.055648975,0.0020978232,0.00435677,0.00174287,0.00010646109],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0073994338,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006705064,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99915963,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014102551,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037382056,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07006228},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2807855793","doi":"10.1007/s10780-018-9333-6","title":"Self-Plagiarism Research Literature in the Social Sciences: A Scoping Review","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Interchange","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"University of Calgary","keywords":"Publishing; Educational research; Empirical research; Set (abstract data type); Publication; Social research; Psychology; Sociology; Social science; Political science; Epistemology; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.4128323445541597,"score_gpt":0.5610724578167843,"score_spread":0.1482401132626246,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2807855793","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00021496318,0.99863416,0.000089183195,0.00052637386,0.00012620256,0.000018716646,0.000025616657,0.0000023952487,0.00036237127],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0037260274,0.9951708,0.00025779032,0.0004956619,0.00016340723,0.00004169263,0.00004179538,0.0000027161327,0.000100126315],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","domain_scores_codex":[0.9869119,0.0047733993,0.0034963808,0.0010763111,0.0033514062,0.000390635],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.88458294,0.096199565,0.009508469,0.0015891354,0.007176809,0.00094303314],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021162165,0.001319438,0.003685329,0.030544626,0.0018948221,0.007974928,0.0021211202,0.004860207,0.0046881284],"category_scores_gemma":[0.091594204,0.0009525538,0.002693744,0.023951499,0.005134771,0.0073857387,0.0051547303,0.0032194254,0.00055011327],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013578488,0.00008812036,0.0018758259,0.46105728,0.002089019,0.0003003688,0.0024771935,0.00019369126,0.00030893993,0.008678634,0.0109088095,0.5118864],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000056302506,0.000079938545,0.0037139955,0.8061979,0.005265974,0.0010946479,0.0028804538,0.00009895495,0.0002782954,0.0072879964,0.17298995,0.00005559881],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0054351445,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01412501,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9951398,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005149783,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.022215648,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.111917555},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2809593576","doi":"10.1101/354621","title":"Analysis and Correction of Inappropriate Image Duplication: The <i>Molecular and Cellular Biology</i> Experience","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institute of Infection and Immunity","funders":"","keywords":"Gene duplication; Image (mathematics); Resolution (logic); Computer science; Psychology; Biology; Artificial intelligence; Genetics","score_opus":0.010746567062823712,"score_gpt":0.2500066498365406,"score_spread":0.23926008277371688,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2809593576","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6451093,0.046723142,0.16158101,0.026977818,0.011503623,0.0041410117,0.010486341,0.013921786,0.079555966],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7727843,0.014546882,0.16239746,0.0068343477,0.0034613824,0.0014048772,0.0067092963,0.007163169,0.024698358],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.89947075,0.03136878,0.01874933,0.009209529,0.03805351,0.003148181],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.5476122,0.1607345,0.080148675,0.08807262,0.117462255,0.0059697186],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.10590462,0.0013428017,0.0017755775,0.016213669,0.0037790507,0.010391006,0.00414196,0.0020910616,0.011570336],"category_scores_gemma":[0.3244054,0.001107271,0.0019489152,0.016449394,0.0028637322,0.0062221177,0.0063310154,0.0021083492,0.009236887],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0017279908,0.00045795934,0.16254044,0.0076353317,0.00095937215,0.007068861,0.020441685,0.00079135067,0.027522862,0.005105119,0.09149206,0.67425704],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018160432,0.0011930951,0.19860184,0.0046899575,0.0014585464,0.022139704,0.012652422,0.005214516,0.113589264,0.009135315,0.63049644,0.00064724585],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014346296,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016647849,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99790895,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0039382624,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0070637823,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.56008387},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2826165912","doi":"10.1177/0961000618785408","title":"Correction and retraction practices in library and information science journals","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Librarianship and Information Science","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Subject (documents); Library science; Quality (philosophy); Web of science; Information science; Minor (academic); Computer science; MEDLINE; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.03919387877003243,"score_gpt":0.3343058517107731,"score_spread":0.29511197294074065,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2826165912","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90021247,0.032599956,0.0132541135,0.019349283,0.0023387126,0.0011145219,0.00066064915,0.0012033012,0.02926717],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9507341,0.010974683,0.017945535,0.0020424514,0.0013687166,0.00038110247,0.00064193975,0.0003852632,0.015526137],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.8167534,0.078058094,0.034839198,0.010092133,0.05644503,0.0038122414],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.31100693,0.30470586,0.19864099,0.058668803,0.11557687,0.0114006195],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.08090798,0.0005883129,0.0011506962,0.01932536,0.005732508,0.008239628,0.0035810682,0.002729958,0.0034987372],"category_scores_gemma":[0.46032372,0.0007773056,0.0011728157,0.015457861,0.003520418,0.00666974,0.0052049565,0.0022113274,0.0030746022],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009335799,0.00029286768,0.2734509,0.0041066157,0.0004520408,0.0035243086,0.10877596,0.00063096534,0.0077307415,0.0033653842,0.020160764,0.5765759],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000126588,0.0019304244,0.4928748,0.0046724696,0.00046480497,0.01831966,0.1051279,0.0031378437,0.015166568,0.0058008465,0.35155147,0.0008266162],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026089798,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0037574728,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99727005,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0044997316,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009838664,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42788738},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity","scholarly_communication"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2868656517","doi":"10.20533/ijds.2040.2570.2016.0142","title":"Academic Integrity: The Fool’s Dilemma","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal for Digital Society","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Humber Polytechnic","funders":"","keywords":"Dilemma; Academic integrity; Research integrity; Law and economics; Political science; Engineering ethics; Philosophy; Sociology; Engineering; Epistemology","score_opus":0.04538027307730528,"score_gpt":0.36012415474493914,"score_spread":0.31474388166763384,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2868656517","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.76443964,0.0025737486,0.010343004,0.18262674,0.00059726083,0.00013788337,0.000037966125,0.00007739522,0.03916643],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9806877,0.0007973306,0.0023930673,0.012368445,0.00019203417,0.000045839486,0.000007634561,0.00002311977,0.0034849274],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9393434,0.04040985,0.0020302753,0.002178635,0.013921393,0.0021164662],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.87555915,0.08253017,0.020796087,0.0057040583,0.009334781,0.0060757967],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.033902224,0.00031476247,0.0007414755,0.0022057667,0.014445701,0.010462968,0.0018003723,0.0055491305,0.0031670476],"category_scores_gemma":[0.146314,0.0003258711,0.00034216375,0.0017482535,0.02263311,0.00799843,0.0063277134,0.0065968116,0.0008054782],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014722487,0.00029151997,0.0678407,0.0003311716,0.000075967364,0.005676755,0.65478355,0.00028183244,0.0012438998,0.06385434,0.030573096,0.17489995],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024062936,0.0003031227,0.027347118,0.0009430617,0.00004650832,0.016793955,0.7730957,0.0013103283,0.0026003777,0.08000151,0.097395584,0.00013864337],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006020579,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008432013,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99445087,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0051144715,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0082239,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17929429},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W288264345","doi":"","title":"The Governance of Research Integrity in Canada","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Health law review","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Research ethics; Honesty; Scientific misconduct; Openness to experience; Public relations; Ethical code; Engineering ethics; Corporate governance; Political science; Social research; Sociology; Law; Psychology; Social science; Social psychology; Medicine; Business","score_opus":0.1486339466513428,"score_gpt":0.4697282483834571,"score_spread":0.3210943017321143,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W288264345","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0122475345,0.027624004,0.009338329,0.52358615,0.0030311798,0.0014593401,0.0018414217,0.00040305796,0.42046902],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5702612,0.031615067,0.030185256,0.15631808,0.0019946774,0.0015488721,0.0017056476,0.00043459202,0.20593667],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.8604963,0.040988505,0.0063846554,0.009433583,0.059310175,0.023386898],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7189331,0.059640955,0.01223247,0.014349041,0.1301633,0.06468108],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.07104459,0.0006616205,0.0015726022,0.006771736,0.028654369,0.03340036,0.008977967,0.011006343,0.017604439],"category_scores_gemma":[0.14282608,0.0013177972,0.001176195,0.013924792,0.02934105,0.0073522343,0.015604493,0.010549597,0.0015454678],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007273315,0.00006094458,0.007830756,0.0009445086,0.00009284897,0.0006927853,0.0106703425,0.001234494,0.0002711848,0.7260578,0.17598009,0.07609152],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000053178253,0.000050571976,0.015727373,0.0024883202,0.00006092424,0.00020622692,0.0058016926,0.0014138494,0.00028641958,0.08939296,0.88433677,0.00018182115],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97969645,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9801373,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98899364,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.34816512,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.7496941,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.75603604},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2883682400","doi":"10.1037/gpr0000040","title":"The Link between Cognitive Ability and Scholastic Cheating: A Meta-Analysis","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of General Psychology","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Cheating; Psychology; Link (geometry); Cognition; Meta-analysis; Social psychology; Cognitive psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.21983196700264357,"score_gpt":0.47470933606240195,"score_spread":0.2548773690597584,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2883682400","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.024906088,0.97319037,0.0006143098,0.0002684728,0.0001450399,0.00012889122,0.00035030855,0.00002260232,0.00037391],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4230805,0.57221764,0.0020281149,0.0008387867,0.0003303163,0.00037525492,0.00077722967,0.000029707779,0.0003224289],"study_design_codex":"meta_analysis","study_design_gemma":"meta_analysis","domain_scores_codex":[0.9956873,0.0020974302,0.0010799638,0.00061631855,0.00039618334,0.000122752],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9795802,0.016159942,0.0023331305,0.00074103643,0.00093473564,0.0002507904],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010278314,0.0016589272,0.008511785,0.0033123186,0.000528213,0.0028380586,0.0015405715,0.001726856,0.0026311285],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025083367,0.00091102644,0.026571095,0.004078752,0.00070610543,0.001146314,0.00096151105,0.0016106403,0.00023185568],"study_design_candidate":"meta_analysis","study_design_consensus":"meta_analysis","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0037621374,0.000094037736,0.018182985,0.13016213,0.82518536,0.00013984562,0.00015554749,0.00034799887,0.00027363346,0.0001561877,0.00048922206,0.021050895],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00060141244,0.00044815333,0.016032856,0.010200477,0.97091585,0.000107501524,0.00006552125,0.00014477476,0.00013260558,0.00024912893,0.0010802952,0.000021390151],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035266797,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0077477866,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99827313,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012307866,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013807662,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05435759},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2884678906","doi":"10.1007/s40979-018-0028-7","title":"Strengthening the research agenda of educational integrity in Canada: a review of the research literature and call to action","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"International Journal for Educational Integrity","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":68,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"University of Calgary","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Research integrity; Political science; Educational research; Action (physics); Work (physics); Public relations; Engineering ethics; Medical education; Sociology; Pedagogy; Medicine; History; Engineering","score_opus":0.33202150113702406,"score_gpt":0.5686972580840289,"score_spread":0.23667575694700488,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2884678906","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0005268224,0.9708623,0.00013960243,0.02515773,0.00083696144,0.000029563798,0.00008751933,0.000008924817,0.0023506475],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.011262251,0.9821186,0.00081832,0.004812957,0.0004078201,0.000035180656,0.00008282358,0.0000076748565,0.0004544053],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9779179,0.0050977175,0.0025179205,0.0012115382,0.011412923,0.0018420877],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.83591086,0.058145583,0.011266165,0.0018903521,0.08328067,0.009506353],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.030038193,0.0010481701,0.0032135348,0.020610452,0.010147755,0.014227829,0.0040133228,0.00447481,0.004216369],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0893605,0.0007299877,0.0015783837,0.03671561,0.010179949,0.007742246,0.0042047068,0.0062357043,0.00059871306],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012818657,0.00006560775,0.0073072235,0.14914845,0.0006138391,0.0010474818,0.013595942,0.0005144415,0.00047468065,0.04385322,0.14654136,0.6367096],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003169846,0.00005059123,0.014490883,0.20982817,0.0010320419,0.00069976377,0.015397513,0.00019945168,0.00031695847,0.00804665,0.7497594,0.00014677865],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8902319,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.95165795,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9955252,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10417572,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.47790787,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.75585127},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2886317728","doi":"10.1002/cc.20313","title":"Meaningful Engagement With Academic Integrity Through a Focus on Context and Relationship","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"New Directions for Community Colleges","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Nipissing University","funders":"","keywords":"Academic integrity; Context (archaeology); Focus (optics); Personal Integrity; Pedagogy; Student engagement; Psychology; Engineering ethics; Research integrity; Space (punctuation); Focus group; Sociology; Public relations; Medical education; Political science; Social psychology; Computer science; Medicine; Engineering","score_opus":0.1192041800043849,"score_gpt":0.3664059028900413,"score_spread":0.24720172288565642,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2886317728","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.33003175,0.008624499,0.060494147,0.1172696,0.001515335,0.0002985074,0.0001303429,0.0004508086,0.48118508],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9786453,0.0017347743,0.00577651,0.0025938898,0.00017161905,0.00009957834,0.000031174553,0.000064355176,0.01088283],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9882161,0.008684503,0.00019433802,0.0006606771,0.0012954021,0.0009489103],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9902276,0.0040727933,0.0011420051,0.00085269165,0.0009060371,0.0027990243],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0055560526,0.00038892752,0.00063504325,0.0010062064,0.01418859,0.0155530125,0.001896084,0.0024747283,0.008753329],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0105200885,0.00033924938,0.0005461184,0.0009379243,0.017915137,0.009539132,0.01920419,0.007166635,0.0010455103],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005210683,0.00024682222,0.007822136,0.00035343814,0.0000343509,0.00095251325,0.6452279,0.00029819555,0.0031285665,0.2688947,0.008226058,0.064763084],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016053447,0.00015916346,0.009056749,0.0008459819,0.000052217983,0.0011112001,0.49756625,0.00047320177,0.0018111053,0.096821144,0.3920148,0.00007211726],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029987209,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0073895752,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9975253,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00400264,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00856152,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02938354},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2886393397","doi":"10.24908/pceea.v0i0.10578","title":"Supplementary Results of the CAIS-1 Survey on Cheating in Undergraduate Engineering Programs in Saskatchewan","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the Canadian Engineering Education Association (CEEA)","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"University of Toronto; University of Saskatchewan","keywords":"Cheating; Academic dishonesty; Academic integrity; Respondent; Minor (academic); Demographics; Psychology; Medical education; Mathematics education; Social psychology; Demography; Sociology; Political science; Medicine; Law","score_opus":0.01606479635908099,"score_gpt":0.24881457640902563,"score_spread":0.23274978004994465,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2886393397","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4441863,0.0001396463,0.0008836276,0.0018685517,0.00016921133,0.0013917225,0.5057018,0.00038027536,0.04527882],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6405275,0.0006370233,0.0047544194,0.0019922848,0.00007283643,0.0046677305,0.27883103,0.00023117688,0.068285994],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99687874,0.00048159738,0.00052549026,0.0002977589,0.0012387632,0.00057769584],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96268857,0.0067791394,0.003502794,0.0018468931,0.0226729,0.0025097844],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029407386,0.00047579172,0.0005362416,0.0040854397,0.0018230529,0.0016913691,0.0012296102,0.00064018276,0.053568814],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014949529,0.00039153497,0.00063474855,0.00754185,0.0005022594,0.00081447064,0.001498889,0.0011109726,0.012138441],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003965057,0.0005475633,0.6795421,0.00069963787,0.00009195554,0.00031469564,0.0053808875,0.0011051536,0.0020290674,0.000786255,0.24005657,0.069049574],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017483724,0.00008809964,0.9647006,0.00012640504,0.000011962203,0.000044748474,0.008412546,0.00023370265,0.00058805256,0.00012290003,0.02559498,0.000058521637],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7006753,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.82557076,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99935985,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009785377,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014580735,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.60217494},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2887657800","doi":"10.1097/acm.0000000000002412","title":"Ethical Shades of Gray: International Frequency of Scientific Misconduct and Questionable Research Practices in Health Professions Education","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Academic Medicine","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":92,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scientific misconduct; Misconduct; Psychology; Research ethics; Medical education; Gray (unit); Public relations; Medicine; Alternative medicine; Political science; Psychiatry; Law; Pathology","score_opus":0.22932342739022307,"score_gpt":0.5565311650287235,"score_spread":0.3272077376385004,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2887657800","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98594487,0.0009539286,0.001426509,0.004007835,0.000065482316,0.000066800465,0.000056810262,0.000012702367,0.007465155],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984971,0.00027701264,0.0005867896,0.0003943154,0.00002444566,0.00002831779,0.000016948976,0.000004339354,0.00017083416],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9688259,0.019968221,0.0031071373,0.001352431,0.005754265,0.0009921327],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8346171,0.06673416,0.07503091,0.0063183466,0.012509134,0.004790421],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.027920704,0.00020701418,0.0002386905,0.003226929,0.0018695501,0.0030077372,0.0007759265,0.0012088842,0.0024057294],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10776242,0.00036694706,0.00041827222,0.001910274,0.0054280525,0.003240171,0.0046473634,0.002286366,0.0002217574],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001190507,0.00016977932,0.89122283,0.0002601832,0.000076716315,0.00016424892,0.068015255,0.000092219336,0.0005644698,0.0020630124,0.0016511342,0.035601012],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017315151,0.0002229468,0.8377635,0.0009088494,0.00006999093,0.0014591434,0.14698537,0.0006034767,0.0007932877,0.0036394822,0.007469588,0.0000670593],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023859513,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035155301,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9987911,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019409206,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022620729,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14766055},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"domain":"methods","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"domain":"methods","study_design":"design_other","genre":"review","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2890784557","doi":"10.1007/s40979-018-0030-0","title":"Effectiveness of tutorials for promoting educational integrity: a synthesis paper","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal for Educational Integrity","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":77,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University; University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Academic dishonesty; Cheating; Academic integrity; Psychological intervention; Psychology; Context (archaeology); Medical education; Misconduct; Intervention (counseling); Academic achievement; Pedagogy; Medicine; Social psychology; Political science","score_opus":0.043677026637462465,"score_gpt":0.4205006072596121,"score_spread":0.3768235806221496,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2890784557","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17688265,0.7442161,0.006057811,0.004041373,0.004117727,0.04075367,0.0042209052,0.00031113625,0.019398656],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.556188,0.3903425,0.020110067,0.0018624793,0.0018461805,0.024607062,0.001124619,0.00012972232,0.003789401],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","domain_scores_codex":[0.9770925,0.011759588,0.005856977,0.0011484358,0.0035795043,0.00056294684],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9038315,0.07689187,0.009086717,0.0024818412,0.0067122094,0.0009959539],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.024794377,0.001308382,0.0044302032,0.004827689,0.0010384202,0.0032575484,0.0016083178,0.0019472602,0.015401165],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09258703,0.00059583026,0.008206743,0.0036822367,0.0011799015,0.0020408973,0.0015977474,0.0023604925,0.00083089736],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.015647465,0.0038859071,0.002364086,0.42255715,0.021474645,0.00017017394,0.0026185573,0.00047873976,0.00086339033,0.0017670458,0.0027180428,0.52545476],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.026892992,0.041398115,0.036084652,0.62201434,0.19611782,0.00043088562,0.007912482,0.0013862266,0.0055787982,0.0036274453,0.058312185,0.00024400766],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003993949,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0071272403,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9980527,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0044583874,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0070546106,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13112682},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2893767808","doi":"10.5206/cjsotl-rcacea.2018.2.4","title":"Turnitin® Use at a Canadian University","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Formative assessment; Psychology; Medical education; Valuation (finance); Pedagogy; Medicine; Business","score_opus":0.05344081465298504,"score_gpt":0.2982642860258081,"score_spread":0.2448234713728231,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2893767808","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93630546,0.0014575188,0.0025242807,0.0046797744,0.00016859073,0.00036366368,0.0018203468,0.001647349,0.051033027],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94450724,0.0024648635,0.0058973287,0.0012814235,0.000057484594,0.00016427298,0.0014474487,0.00030261575,0.043877367],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9942451,0.0007571149,0.00027841053,0.0006563469,0.0029397504,0.0011233137],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97092426,0.0044149603,0.0015498617,0.0013378685,0.014302078,0.0074708904],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0046782237,0.000462812,0.00042233896,0.0027670972,0.006990725,0.003951894,0.001783106,0.0007195995,0.012932483],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014694304,0.00043887817,0.00038420234,0.0032176923,0.0015329103,0.0016477501,0.003011875,0.0011953613,0.0026645937],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011010318,0.0006968085,0.1973771,0.0010697234,0.0000732894,0.0028680132,0.17161264,0.00059037213,0.028288057,0.003593303,0.062960744,0.529769],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006939838,0.001307233,0.45142296,0.0008154105,0.00011997405,0.0015040378,0.13878022,0.0018732491,0.014265004,0.00052255293,0.38878486,0.00053504115],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7969367,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.86732554,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9992804,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.021760609,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.038637333,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40851837},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2896309936","doi":"10.11575/cpai.v1i2.54599","title":"Academic Integrity across the Canadian Landscape","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Calgary","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Nature versus nurture; Academic integrity; Center (category theory); Political science; Geography; Library science; Public administration; Public relations; Environmental ethics; Sociology; Anthropology; Computer science","score_opus":0.021057498341192957,"score_gpt":0.2732196085520171,"score_spread":0.25216211021082413,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2896309936","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.106104925,0.018382868,0.0024259489,0.369495,0.0016324163,0.0001330313,0.00057637715,0.00027903533,0.5009704],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9024404,0.013085663,0.0019994702,0.025730843,0.000327566,0.00005379546,0.00025020685,0.00015337154,0.05595863],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.97861594,0.0032204762,0.00047714962,0.0016518852,0.008343933,0.0076906327],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95240015,0.0033230267,0.0020439907,0.0011736111,0.020980285,0.020078976],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009824868,0.0005068492,0.0007716344,0.0053609693,0.08905559,0.024247201,0.0032331129,0.0041107335,0.01629841],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024198527,0.0005491637,0.00067958084,0.00991557,0.02831657,0.0065066763,0.013451149,0.008686647,0.001225275],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012429102,0.0001108807,0.02463853,0.00044454588,0.000065844855,0.0012476376,0.091386735,0.0007461652,0.0006975334,0.50432324,0.17529835,0.20091636],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021628359,0.00005183794,0.037300635,0.00087837665,0.00004698131,0.00036032146,0.09369722,0.00036152787,0.00039842186,0.02446868,0.84222704,0.00018726275],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9900136,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9951624,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99588925,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.22198577,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.47912222,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.90238625},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2898694098","doi":"10.2196/12152","title":"Cyberincivility in the Massive Open Online Course Learning Environment: Data-Mining Study","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"JMIR Medical Education","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Massive open online course; Course (navigation); Computer science; Data science; Online learning; World Wide Web; Engineering","score_opus":0.056821736961955,"score_gpt":0.4427804938521208,"score_spread":0.3859587568901658,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2898694098","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9950671,0.000119934266,0.0018022142,0.00016803152,0.000008831081,0.00025943827,0.0020642034,0.000020120342,0.0004901746],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9897906,0.00014322063,0.005071203,0.00011562147,0.00002952502,0.00053274893,0.003951418,0.00001553038,0.00035024565],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9959104,0.0010853814,0.00066131726,0.0009762513,0.0009298502,0.00043686773],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9624131,0.026237004,0.005879399,0.0016781066,0.0025708093,0.0012215519],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004493979,0.00040648688,0.00064534106,0.005057356,0.0010688087,0.0016917975,0.0010699466,0.0010820013,0.0011398972],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018297337,0.00026198893,0.0010719029,0.0052999062,0.0010025153,0.0013369444,0.0012790889,0.0012560717,0.00052297424],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017566884,0.00078791357,0.9723031,0.00034391572,0.000121597106,0.00096548646,0.0033310112,0.00067672145,0.0007681539,0.00031956777,0.0017445569,0.018462276],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003853806,0.00038880025,0.9556382,0.00031123604,0.0002085588,0.0017496354,0.017496947,0.016622256,0.0015496898,0.000646977,0.0052882205,0.00006110299],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004375051,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0062860553,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005057356,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00065624085,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017743811,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.023766756},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2899783344","doi":"10.1016/j.ijme.2018.10.004","title":"We're not in Kansas anymore: Academic honesty in an international business program","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The International Journal of Management Education","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Royal Roads University; Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Honesty; Political science; Sociology; Management; Psychology; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.038118796349913046,"score_gpt":0.3927255462126806,"score_spread":0.3546067498627675,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2899783344","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7325956,0.00045587274,0.00056051277,0.207788,0.0012955889,0.00006137747,0.000017609558,0.00005099588,0.057174485],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96587336,0.0002914913,0.00035127517,0.014734959,0.00019025928,0.000038338672,0.000012740404,0.000043831766,0.018463887],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9892363,0.0051179887,0.00020817993,0.00037278625,0.0013613178,0.0037034003],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96840936,0.0062295985,0.0025509936,0.0009822622,0.00244969,0.019378055],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010906066,0.00023379497,0.0003200312,0.0007494711,0.048438508,0.01466212,0.0025979462,0.0072007896,0.00894035],"category_scores_gemma":[0.032333888,0.00044204295,0.000438562,0.0011564035,0.01061683,0.008143683,0.012572629,0.019246757,0.0009346753],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003868192,0.0042747012,0.07139346,0.000120566416,0.000058105554,0.006370675,0.55764216,0.00023893139,0.00091620284,0.072026946,0.15695499,0.12961647],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000059701288,0.00031224222,0.021676045,0.00023811359,0.000044122386,0.0009454867,0.88679564,0.00038179537,0.0004019384,0.0089097,0.08016987,0.00006537286],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018009108,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07487899,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9927992,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010071733,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.027388478,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07307595},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2899926800","doi":"10.11575/cpai.v1i2.56983","title":"Academic Integrity Pledges -- Acculturating Students to Integrity within Canadian Higher Education","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Calgary","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Humber Polytechnic","funders":"","keywords":"Academic integrity; Situated; Public relations; Engineering ethics; Learning development; Quality (philosophy); Psychology; Higher education; Pedagogy; Political science; Social psychology; Engineering; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.034839791507911354,"score_gpt":0.3179904873729235,"score_spread":0.2831506958650122,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2899926800","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.41345605,0.009694144,0.0041931365,0.21582535,0.0022921963,0.00037024895,0.00011799242,0.0002703028,0.3537807],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92522866,0.003963202,0.0024801614,0.007159857,0.00013667002,0.000035340898,0.00005085751,0.00004460837,0.06090064],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9908133,0.0021191821,0.00032429377,0.00038870133,0.0034081885,0.0029462294],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9692534,0.0035156426,0.002535417,0.0012456805,0.010317825,0.013132074],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008174124,0.0003561377,0.00033090587,0.0013426194,0.0382135,0.010410638,0.0025617334,0.0029365052,0.009346984],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023811463,0.0002465608,0.00041865278,0.001793611,0.015859935,0.0035939133,0.009274544,0.0059406585,0.001057216],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007622693,0.0004106752,0.06887112,0.0006979181,0.00002792016,0.0019954636,0.29267383,0.00036742643,0.0020636274,0.11093221,0.085178114,0.43670547],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011949352,0.00021494982,0.09427519,0.000838069,0.000033902328,0.0008999515,0.35531685,0.00025072918,0.0021007156,0.010946126,0.53494996,0.00016154887],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.80886257,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9383684,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9970635,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06260141,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.21379,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.45420712},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2900971880","doi":"","title":"CTL TLA3 posters | Academic integrity and research workshop for Practical Nursing students","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SOURCE Sheridan's Institutional Repository (Sheridan College)","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Academic integrity; Scientific integrity; CTL*; Nursing; Medical education; Medicine; Psychology; Engineering ethics; Engineering; Immunology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.10747498433196917,"score_gpt":0.4581880763859604,"score_spread":0.3507130920539912,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2900971880","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016264603,0.00092206564,0.0060945805,0.092604406,0.049233977,0.0035444584,0.0038877544,0.0042832643,0.8231649],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.034971304,0.00053128536,0.0038394502,0.0076868497,0.0055864337,0.0013275542,0.0014338489,0.0006398873,0.9439834],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99856406,0.00030582087,0.000058431648,0.00013666958,0.00052099384,0.0004139781],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98988533,0.0011771629,0.00037001143,0.00058467453,0.002961304,0.00502145],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0044798427,0.00075321354,0.0003934111,0.0007107747,0.0063354895,0.0039145765,0.0014490715,0.003487512,0.4038358],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0074077668,0.0005003051,0.00079198985,0.0004456084,0.0014514046,0.001713802,0.005900736,0.0057403864,0.1497872],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009172519,0.00014603505,0.00021164714,0.000052784675,0.0000015337904,0.0001858609,0.00052278966,0.000033887707,0.0008675711,0.0005425949,0.9822938,0.015049818],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000041955624,0.00011379764,0.0023220112,0.000096083,0.0000016817239,0.00011952581,0.001794816,0.00011603447,0.00037076467,0.0008070878,0.9941989,0.000017315973],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011215752,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05790404,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9965125,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0039585046,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0076746545,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.85035586},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2900978710","doi":"10.22215/etd/2018-12968","title":"Unproctored Internet Testing in Personnel Selection: A Test of Cheating Deterrence Strategies","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Cheating; Deception; Psychology; Test (biology); Social psychology; The Internet; Deterrence (psychology); Cognition; Selection (genetic algorithm); Applied psychology; Criminology; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.040383672290961826,"score_gpt":0.3327694607628057,"score_spread":0.2923857884718439,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2900978710","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99283856,0.00018750939,0.0009440049,0.0003216962,0.000024976609,0.00024874267,0.000027732143,0.000009024094,0.0053978506],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99666256,0.00013885139,0.0017482638,0.00021693317,0.000029434323,0.00021447781,0.000031373995,0.000007845676,0.0009501543],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.95468825,0.03529569,0.0017301474,0.0018756161,0.0053707096,0.0010396714],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.59429497,0.30285943,0.06470432,0.02331265,0.008429871,0.0063986746],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04024355,0.00043409472,0.0005574886,0.0008769776,0.0010189362,0.0017740603,0.0013331186,0.0014586194,0.0035936248],"category_scores_gemma":[0.20356107,0.00035788026,0.0005608711,0.000742262,0.0016064361,0.0026598815,0.0017818223,0.0022143028,0.0008008494],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.010758326,0.013964668,0.71471596,0.0004894232,0.0005623005,0.00019386013,0.012638033,0.000787489,0.0019951565,0.0035632085,0.0007277979,0.23960388],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006280917,0.039155323,0.93408364,0.00055576547,0.000490224,0.0005353281,0.0071427063,0.009433216,0.001897353,0.00247998,0.0035185923,0.00007984277],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010620245,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008964365,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99854136,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007156518,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019649477,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21283078},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2901160785","doi":"10.1007/s40037-018-0482-1","title":"Re-using questions in classroom-based assessment: An exploratory study at the undergraduate medical education level","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Perspectives on Medical Education","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke; Hôtel-Dieu de Québec","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Cheating; Repeated measures design; Psychology; Quality (philosophy); Exploratory research; Medical education; Pooling; Variance (accounting); Applied psychology; Medicine; Computer science; Social psychology; Statistics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.06036400277014534,"score_gpt":0.4430604969798034,"score_spread":0.382696494209658,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2901160785","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9994685,0.000022848239,0.00025243696,0.000022084429,0.000001409577,0.00007011914,0.000009451064,0.000004675057,0.00014848342],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978903,0.00005601138,0.0013379828,0.000057804802,0.0000065745526,0.00016251292,0.000030009363,0.000007782326,0.0004510829],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9916031,0.0051887324,0.0005790158,0.00068046787,0.0011481581,0.0008006337],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95330304,0.032564424,0.0047120517,0.0023629938,0.0043978035,0.0026596894],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014418096,0.00065806403,0.0007993741,0.0013403709,0.0014771369,0.0019917286,0.0013960905,0.0012112252,0.001299774],"category_scores_gemma":[0.046686105,0.0006767033,0.00057208975,0.0010092864,0.0014634152,0.0015100612,0.0022302894,0.0017700241,0.00057201285],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010538064,0.022684408,0.4156576,0.00070013583,0.00012665102,0.0030344157,0.4298504,0.0008276851,0.015624065,0.00034262144,0.0007968333,0.10930141],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002490284,0.02863573,0.68310565,0.0003202068,0.0001327769,0.0029424168,0.26353863,0.0026689714,0.01142556,0.00054299907,0.006225649,0.0002122868],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015500432,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033783203,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014418096,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013328773,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015207545,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07625109},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2901396287","doi":"10.1016/j.jht.2018.10.001","title":"Self-plagiarism is not easily defined, but should be avoided","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"editorial","venue":"Journal of Hand Therapy","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"St Joseph's Health Centre","funders":"","keywords":"Accidental; Psychology; Internet privacy; Computer science","score_opus":0.042157516803043485,"score_gpt":0.33588604285104195,"score_spread":0.2937285260479985,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2901396287","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000063901934,0.0027872925,0.00014823563,0.036593154,0.9594831,0.000012696441,0.00001957609,0.000035072484,0.00085702044],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00079673046,0.0027159243,0.00016382735,0.013782201,0.97770965,0.000020376932,0.00001146232,0.000022377375,0.004777436],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9876094,0.0025134066,0.0025971977,0.0012075079,0.0054014944,0.00067104155],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.88938,0.059923735,0.006397294,0.0033313343,0.034146596,0.006821037],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01269861,0.0033193047,0.00456072,0.005252305,0.0046697324,0.01116552,0.0036633534,0.027439287,0.009177055],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10823459,0.0012447028,0.0021663145,0.0020481327,0.005795266,0.005293992,0.002231958,0.026513277,0.0059367768],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000384482,0.000025559444,0.00008315067,0.00051471713,0.000031598982,0.0003307242,0.000065851535,0.000025809039,0.00006313318,0.0009099427,0.98470044,0.013210581],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000074740914,0.0000656142,0.0008683496,0.0017202639,0.000090092704,0.0011162054,0.00031516628,0.00029478094,0.00024689085,0.003958513,0.99119484,0.000054565822],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013153646,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003946023,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9873014,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036555887,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0040689586,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06715745},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["research_integrity"],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"editorial","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["research_integrity"],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"editorial","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W2902813639","doi":"10.19173/irrodl.v19i5.3698","title":"Interaction of Proctoring and Student Major on Online Test Performance","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":65,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Academic dishonesty; Cheating; Academic integrity; Test (biology); Online learning; Psychology; Mathematics education; Medical education; Computer science; Medicine; Multimedia","score_opus":0.11714743683188585,"score_gpt":0.5079182663745356,"score_spread":0.3907708295426498,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2902813639","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99889565,0.000059745093,0.00032820058,0.000033863544,0.00000757054,0.000017897324,0.000038048573,0.000018438082,0.0006005462],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99862134,0.00004753179,0.00046853223,0.00001677296,0.000008785139,0.000037594145,0.000058773407,0.000014789695,0.0007259825],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99068356,0.005281496,0.0006943991,0.0012036023,0.0015064491,0.0006305018],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.86921096,0.10571471,0.012163345,0.0049675973,0.00253924,0.005404142],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004469914,0.00051646325,0.000787119,0.0005993402,0.0003636447,0.0016953221,0.0009991513,0.00060607865,0.0046544694],"category_scores_gemma":[0.044836674,0.00022228513,0.00073175266,0.00065961777,0.0007153115,0.0006904418,0.0010173033,0.0010468928,0.0006281419],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.012977118,0.0064703515,0.86406773,0.00021323194,0.0007208014,0.00043050008,0.002494657,0.0012644693,0.016651925,0.0005525591,0.00071205676,0.09344452],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011758535,0.011488965,0.9793746,0.000026507885,0.00025106367,0.00024207568,0.00071825966,0.0025390869,0.004139966,0.0002114785,0.0008483611,0.000041998424],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008425552,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010778337,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99939394,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005535033,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00075651356,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02363944},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2904593008","doi":"10.1016/j.amjmed.2018.11.034","title":"The Ego Has Landed! What Can Be Done About Research Misconduct, Scandals, and Spins?","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"editorial","venue":"The American Journal of Medicine","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Scopus; Misconduct; Incentive; Medicine; Scientific misconduct; Public relations; Political science; Law; Alternative medicine; MEDLINE","score_opus":0.07605535085895729,"score_gpt":0.41568087632625395,"score_spread":0.33962552546729663,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2904593008","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000355128,0.0049108304,0.00007023111,0.12751982,0.8666202,0.000008372053,0.000028894508,0.000033669083,0.000772421],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0005572698,0.0051419046,0.0000890186,0.038540415,0.95214933,0.000021018719,0.000016047394,0.000023067734,0.003461887],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9795297,0.0053090374,0.0032121378,0.0016234549,0.009088919,0.0012368162],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.81014895,0.12448039,0.008354955,0.003887131,0.042267155,0.010861416],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.032332752,0.0040791724,0.0055750567,0.007192824,0.00889817,0.021337729,0.007089927,0.046979498,0.012259346],"category_scores_gemma":[0.16369478,0.0019120778,0.003261395,0.003434996,0.008175206,0.012046161,0.0029973683,0.04842644,0.0068543516],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001956419,0.00001229343,0.000056460594,0.00021645168,0.000032247164,0.0001128982,0.00005972784,0.0000141487335,0.000012048458,0.0008979102,0.99355364,0.0050127],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008928655,0.000034654324,0.00056167453,0.0017859677,0.00016307646,0.00027425057,0.000498031,0.00021077534,0.000079618374,0.006995201,0.98923534,0.00007210083],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034352723,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0116821425,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9530205,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0065401946,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010569636,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17099398},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"editorial","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["research_integrity"],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"editorial","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2905211245","doi":"","title":"LibGuides: Architecture: Avoid Plagiarism by Citing your Sources | The APA, MLA, Chicago, & Vancouver Citation Styles","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"libguides","venue":"","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Architecture; Computer science; Library science; Geography; Archaeology","score_opus":0.02425563291438315,"score_gpt":0.29305925340933076,"score_spread":0.2688036204949476,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2905211245","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0052787582,0.0020595742,0.00926404,0.029448763,0.0022195098,0.00014485863,0.002645703,0.011528635,0.9374102],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.061848227,0.0044941455,0.023608306,0.0023741594,0.0016636001,0.00034471005,0.0051402147,0.007591248,0.89293534],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9945023,0.0012064042,0.0004405459,0.00024255746,0.0033126164,0.00029557734],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97910094,0.0045133205,0.0009210682,0.0039683976,0.009721853,0.0017743814],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007328292,0.00074253086,0.00068462006,0.010935822,0.0075225765,0.016425258,0.0017377242,0.0026186486,0.14787412],"category_scores_gemma":[0.040260434,0.0009322944,0.00035540643,0.013167705,0.0032138848,0.010324342,0.005252477,0.0023870934,0.06796301],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015145422,0.0000232581,0.00086974347,0.00006354607,0.0000044590315,0.000025445555,0.00078381045,0.0000695301,0.00011624216,0.020597626,0.8352816,0.1421496],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024095183,0.000011039934,0.002486984,0.00021765039,0.000010832249,0.00009946474,0.0010667499,0.00066576345,0.00056588213,0.021033412,0.9737922,0.000025941017],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03516833,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.118288316,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9973813,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0042250827,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01604501,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4946882},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2907672252","doi":"10.1080/03075079.2018.1564258","title":"Cheaters on Twitter: an analysis of engagement approaches of contract cheating services","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Studies in Higher Education","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Centre for Social Innovation","funders":"","keywords":"Cheating; Outreach; Misconduct; Higher education; Academic integrity; Exploratory research; Subject (documents); Competition (biology); Public relations; Business; Sociology; Marketing; Computer science; Psychology; Political science; World Wide Web; Social psychology; Law","score_opus":0.17612637209922144,"score_gpt":0.41218216679976005,"score_spread":0.2360557947005386,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2907672252","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98267835,0.00025572657,0.0019058209,0.00094724976,0.000024914614,0.00014216249,0.0004227972,0.00003342629,0.013589583],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9940771,0.0002492649,0.001173404,0.0002226583,0.000033623783,0.00019537244,0.0003525771,0.000051859068,0.0036440834],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9912941,0.0050069457,0.00040834057,0.00048439603,0.0017875199,0.0010188761],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96781164,0.02115274,0.004494299,0.0016227441,0.0031601146,0.0017584157],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005182458,0.00035520608,0.0005457935,0.0042470708,0.004379853,0.004117329,0.0008571812,0.0013190712,0.0047101313],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030633783,0.00025820968,0.00034442262,0.0048114695,0.0024060511,0.004538563,0.0048025567,0.0016972714,0.0013981375],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00037817252,0.00019509064,0.2051336,0.00039140726,0.00004209646,0.0011633385,0.70087117,0.00020542929,0.0034009668,0.005272624,0.0034342408,0.07951186],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013338724,0.00017003613,0.21893099,0.0002958614,0.000028344217,0.0006785766,0.73616564,0.002405458,0.0012573533,0.0018105301,0.038164333,0.00007953283],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0076698987,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011057389,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99868095,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021814706,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017576263,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.027407825},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2908030757","doi":"10.1002/9781118784235.eelt0550","title":"Reading and Writing Connections in Source‐Based Writing","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"The TESOL Encyclopedia of English Language Teaching","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Reading (process); Discipline; Academic writing; Context (archaeology); Raising (metalworking); Ethnography; Professional writing; Pedagogy; Mathematics education; Psychology; Computer science; Linguistics; Sociology; Engineering","score_opus":0.010949775709582363,"score_gpt":0.2900594712913776,"score_spread":0.2791096955817952,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2908030757","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.29820994,0.0023591784,0.058797266,0.0049721873,0.00038608178,0.0003760923,0.00017328936,0.0005341242,0.6341919],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95526737,0.00087744766,0.012500666,0.00017339704,0.00009706158,0.00014481718,0.00011953943,0.00022028305,0.03059951],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9883786,0.0077444245,0.00053781003,0.00079984893,0.0021373918,0.0004018506],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9498982,0.03414299,0.004128172,0.005888474,0.0038547753,0.0020873623],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0060065957,0.00040773343,0.0002704655,0.003292424,0.0045011905,0.01283622,0.001444844,0.0018100447,0.013927511],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04945146,0.00042244126,0.00027678683,0.0029295497,0.008105238,0.014074595,0.008499324,0.0027695445,0.0021745265],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017301414,0.00027460116,0.013231918,0.00059075566,0.000023494033,0.0028830082,0.49658865,0.0004504986,0.0043793246,0.2929926,0.0046180263,0.183794],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006957659,0.00031229414,0.03497743,0.0022725484,0.000041872812,0.009562701,0.30893776,0.0023168137,0.0102884,0.2992331,0.33187872,0.00010871976],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006285557,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011363692,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013927511,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018481436,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002547039,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.046592176},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2908407460","doi":"10.1002/ieam.4119","title":"Scientific integrity issues in Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry: Improving research reproducibility, credibility, and transparency","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":56,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Environment and Climate Change Canada","funders":"Natural Environment Research Council; Sight Research UK","keywords":"Credibility; Transparency (behavior); Scientific integrity; Scientific misconduct; Misconduct; Research integrity; Engineering ethics; Rigour; Political science; Medicine; Engineering; Law; Epistemology; Alternative medicine","score_opus":0.10770681574271605,"score_gpt":0.42169450875953407,"score_spread":0.313987693016818,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2908407460","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"reproducibility","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":"reproducibility","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00021036826,0.9692472,0.0017458664,0.023804856,0.0015960063,0.00005528605,0.000025445279,0.000023343731,0.003291542],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.009389121,0.9742605,0.0046188785,0.007670239,0.002660569,0.00014092991,0.00006202125,0.000023007315,0.0011747582],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.90671176,0.051404923,0.012149364,0.0032074857,0.024895674,0.0016308097],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.67372173,0.24677038,0.02553786,0.0098135965,0.04059332,0.0035631596],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0839479,0.0010628388,0.0030628678,0.011652485,0.0025940102,0.011428237,0.003417297,0.009699577,0.0030979805],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1690898,0.0008101877,0.0022003204,0.010855282,0.013043655,0.014105056,0.0059708958,0.008492323,0.0013791313],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007527904,0.00007344471,0.00095507875,0.07093436,0.00049650343,0.0003377534,0.0024090656,0.00047544795,0.00079860346,0.082156114,0.043938495,0.7973498],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000031980766,0.00012219536,0.0019434228,0.07931971,0.0005168152,0.0010661714,0.0012706987,0.00032666142,0.001364959,0.06510347,0.8488236,0.0001103318],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004305941,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00537909,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9903004,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0076752612,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.030561587,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.44396424},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2914134160","doi":"10.3138/jsp.50.2.01","title":"Blacklisting or Whitelisting? Deterring Faculty in Developing Countries from Publishing in Substandard Journals","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Blacklisting; Publishing; Thriving; Publication; Scholarship; Developing country; Political science; Deterrence theory; Public relations; Business; Sociology; Law; Economics; Social science; Economic growth","score_opus":0.07795371365937098,"score_gpt":0.346637096801237,"score_spread":0.268683383141866,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2914134160","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.746447,0.0050375797,0.007540083,0.1290685,0.000507878,0.00029896168,0.00005694075,0.00011153296,0.110931456],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98101234,0.0022024023,0.003215344,0.008411003,0.0001794651,0.0000553174,0.000014321126,0.000013787118,0.004895964],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9910705,0.004892459,0.00037386038,0.0004358435,0.0015597176,0.0016676683],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9650513,0.01156761,0.0145505145,0.0017036813,0.0024196396,0.0047073136],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01194475,0.00035931848,0.0003983363,0.0015106436,0.006310829,0.00568825,0.0010301552,0.0026704483,0.0042106467],"category_scores_gemma":[0.038836114,0.0001990377,0.00025461722,0.0016334163,0.0053067785,0.003917041,0.0044023925,0.001908295,0.00094113254],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00045020363,0.00069913286,0.2568627,0.001286913,0.00010510747,0.001709981,0.06584032,0.00059103005,0.006414432,0.090369985,0.026387446,0.5492827],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023276394,0.002550969,0.39253387,0.00465801,0.00023603631,0.0048565385,0.232193,0.0036223605,0.018984394,0.06153038,0.2782713,0.0003304856],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003625623,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010328371,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99732953,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00229071,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007536862,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06317067},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2914199159","doi":"10.1007/s10459-019-09876-7","title":"Salami-slicing and plagiarism: How should we respond?","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"editorial","venue":"Advances in Health Sciences Education","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":50,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Impact; McMaster University; University of Toronto; University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Slicing; Computer science; Academic integrity; Medical education; Medicine; World Wide Web; Library science","score_opus":0.026584919306302867,"score_gpt":0.4158786635765499,"score_spread":0.38929374427024704,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2914199159","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00003304791,0.007428529,0.00007931547,0.13185045,0.8598275,0.000011874248,0.000025890222,0.000033378048,0.00071005273],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00038353377,0.0034334827,0.000068342364,0.0372806,0.95593077,0.000015801257,0.000012948852,0.00002263089,0.0028519253],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97990674,0.0043367445,0.0035391813,0.0017377228,0.009149178,0.001330408],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8798409,0.060016982,0.008087058,0.0026013947,0.03715587,0.0122977495],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02316674,0.0036401213,0.005423948,0.008326426,0.007099682,0.020347835,0.006191238,0.061065096,0.013876562],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1122418,0.0018933719,0.0037945386,0.0037207769,0.0067247124,0.009531539,0.004350066,0.042032186,0.008503383],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017468743,0.000008563159,0.00003888123,0.00025519333,0.000025121091,0.00009121058,0.000048357288,0.0000101489295,0.000019062027,0.00035390526,0.994372,0.0047600614],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010420983,0.000037748745,0.00058042567,0.0020240056,0.00015056503,0.0004246511,0.00035144415,0.00020526191,0.00009821505,0.0040439502,0.9919214,0.0000581215],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036610046,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011750557,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9389349,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007848823,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009240793,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12251896},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2917674691","doi":"10.18162/fp.2019.a162","title":"Que pensent les futurs enseignants du plagiat scolaire?","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Formation et profession","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Art","score_opus":0.03020680565466486,"score_gpt":0.3094420592254221,"score_spread":0.27923525357075724,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2917674691","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90689147,0.009496416,0.0014046227,0.043911766,0.00048633607,0.00006340046,0.00025055645,0.000040923325,0.037454482],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97534764,0.0042948127,0.00028266924,0.002450603,0.00026403813,0.00003897628,0.00009256217,0.000030255569,0.017198512],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9946374,0.0023444958,0.00030503722,0.00036436517,0.0014825119,0.0008661628],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9800851,0.007350381,0.006616204,0.00071023253,0.0025082624,0.0027299316],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0072671217,0.00027517864,0.00045184637,0.0027292168,0.008515883,0.008165941,0.0007159488,0.0018557329,0.010664252],"category_scores_gemma":[0.041288625,0.00022640436,0.00031459,0.0024160922,0.00517363,0.0063774665,0.005109648,0.0032331543,0.0016069602],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009323448,0.00008376459,0.19867814,0.00045887547,0.00003650213,0.00086520886,0.6651322,0.00008135918,0.0007866041,0.019187454,0.0141825285,0.10041412],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011489609,0.00013182095,0.1903542,0.0008960201,0.000030114506,0.0014828502,0.65846753,0.00014323858,0.00055764284,0.0044631707,0.14338014,0.00008190056],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018935837,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.033202562,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99814427,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0045704287,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0060043097,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.038432658},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2917784508","doi":"10.5539/ies.v12n3p10","title":"Rationality and Students’ Misconduct at University: Empirical Evidence and Policy Implications","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Education Studies","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Misconduct; Psychology; Seniority; Punitive damages; Social psychology; Academic integrity; Rationality; Criminology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.2146193703742991,"score_gpt":0.508849539181875,"score_spread":0.2942301688075759,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2917784508","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97950065,0.0020786067,0.00057004037,0.009954023,0.00002265541,0.000020123005,0.000104482686,0.00001028011,0.007739133],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989974,0.00050560536,0.000066690256,0.00016378873,0.000018053714,0.0000060461175,0.00001841801,0.0000011365714,0.00022276859],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9856899,0.008274692,0.0009786492,0.0009706843,0.0024132477,0.0016728598],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.61663085,0.24477224,0.10748172,0.007660994,0.010392826,0.01306134],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0130078355,0.00020448,0.0005314205,0.004144848,0.002383432,0.0038601847,0.0014710762,0.0022957614,0.0057350523],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08647562,0.0002461547,0.0004702994,0.004185973,0.0053839395,0.0028341813,0.0026588102,0.003263614,0.0003931983],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013340096,0.00048046128,0.9686072,0.00012982103,0.0000913804,0.00020956776,0.00202173,0.0008256697,0.00008261501,0.008603815,0.0005929197,0.018221423],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000035630816,0.00024703433,0.9668472,0.0003771585,0.00009876837,0.00019438345,0.01358251,0.0025035627,0.0006170204,0.012510021,0.0029398524,0.000046791134],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009877906,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009892971,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99770427,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030654578,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005581516,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06879282},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2920377922","doi":"10.1007/s11948-019-00094-3","title":"Scientific Integrity Principles and Best Practices: Recommendations from a Scientific Integrity Consortium","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science and Engineering Ethics","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":170,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; Canadian Nutrition Society","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research; National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine","keywords":"Scientific integrity; Transparency (behavior); Engineering ethics; Best practice; Publication; Harmonization; Scientific misconduct; Research integrity; Process (computing); Philosophy of science; Academic integrity; Scientific evidence; Data integrity; Research ethics; Quality (philosophy); Computer science; Political science; Medicine; Engineering; Law; Computer security","score_opus":0.15591522983758016,"score_gpt":0.3841029606226381,"score_spread":0.22818773078505794,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2920377922","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0006370453,0.011837323,0.024648136,0.9310342,0.011978668,0.0019017498,0.0004043508,0.00080183643,0.016756665],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.014281153,0.027525963,0.38304693,0.5405444,0.005240227,0.008384462,0.0021613133,0.001028651,0.017786946],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.6184418,0.18256451,0.05261779,0.013719657,0.11213776,0.02051848],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.32004505,0.2414827,0.03023568,0.033631824,0.32228127,0.052323453],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.4186075,0.004601844,0.0063649425,0.019364534,0.016740339,0.049559858,0.025259579,0.08201861,0.009587427],"category_scores_gemma":[0.49925342,0.0045429645,0.01114611,0.01801512,0.0251396,0.047382504,0.03261385,0.08316102,0.014511562],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018639216,0.0012617898,0.0018995363,0.0037523066,0.00020095895,0.00081606774,0.0047711483,0.0023365454,0.0006193137,0.12816092,0.73691535,0.119079664],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00050173106,0.00024896537,0.0016964554,0.021302167,0.0003096386,0.0004180418,0.0056560254,0.0022174516,0.0011549299,0.13376342,0.83215654,0.0005747133],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04050354,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.033216245,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9179814,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.026369661,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2695974,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.71696043},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"domain":"methods","study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"methods","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"domain":"methods","study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"commentary","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W2942060765","doi":"10.3968/10978","title":"Analysis and Countermeasures of College Students’ Cheating in Examinations: Taking X as an Example","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Higher education of social science","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cheating; Honesty; Phenomenon; Psychology; Mathematics education; Curriculum; Medical education; Pedagogy; Social psychology; Medicine; Epistemology","score_opus":0.05334930856755935,"score_gpt":0.4047640752704781,"score_spread":0.3514147667029187,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2942060765","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9977246,0.00015148605,0.0006410525,0.0001710044,0.000008402975,0.000033910008,0.00005540942,0.000014985896,0.0011989856],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99903727,0.000082356324,0.00050981,0.000024606305,0.000008988264,0.000013716946,0.000052860876,0.0000023978248,0.00026808845],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99668795,0.0014412029,0.0003406043,0.00032206692,0.00090948946,0.000298589],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96716833,0.012498939,0.012826975,0.0019497361,0.004246846,0.0013092681],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030863464,0.00021294013,0.00030888623,0.0027794363,0.0010112788,0.0008652869,0.0004244559,0.0004486882,0.0007773671],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017369697,0.000106957814,0.00037791755,0.0021160427,0.0007173831,0.0009118363,0.0008991894,0.00076143356,0.00013609939],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020709481,0.0002770785,0.9254676,0.00012954843,0.00009186157,0.000365497,0.0046674632,0.0003440851,0.0013318454,0.000721353,0.0007855071,0.065611],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004822163,0.00031630858,0.9914791,0.000025171475,0.00003138885,0.00014999967,0.0049258904,0.0012306356,0.00078604696,0.0001419976,0.0008926668,0.000015940383],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038157552,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003996632,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9995513,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007604691,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00094311405,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.016322315},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2944645468","doi":"10.11575/prism/36469","title":"Canadian Symposium on Academic Integrity: Program and Abstracts","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Open MIND","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Academic integrity; Research integrity; Political science; Engineering ethics; Medical education; Library science; Medicine; Computer science; Public relations; Engineering","score_opus":0.04163247236112377,"score_gpt":0.3563635695918783,"score_spread":0.31473109723075454,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2944645468","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0027572694,0.08722118,0.0027856757,0.17505267,0.062075924,0.0009339248,0.005947378,0.0007387622,0.6624873],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.03863736,0.074855365,0.003659455,0.0058195023,0.012975194,0.00045176665,0.00425582,0.00049899775,0.8588464],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9861237,0.0010206106,0.00039872088,0.00062020216,0.009741781,0.002094914],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9600884,0.0010740195,0.00084222486,0.0010968777,0.027910274,0.008988197],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008982469,0.0017292869,0.0012794355,0.00673025,0.015128732,0.014798375,0.0037040892,0.0041368017,0.15091631],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015263751,0.000828149,0.0010025383,0.008538003,0.0047425725,0.0034264585,0.0071968534,0.0046980646,0.04335075],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016653688,0.000011827333,0.00007968721,0.00014958832,0.0000034238396,0.000021737455,0.00018327787,0.000035333378,0.000121210454,0.004605121,0.9757749,0.018997144],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000033899491,0.0000051243846,0.0005909434,0.00013186477,0.0000032676335,0.000021638238,0.00028270815,0.000028701543,0.000082674516,0.00055363553,0.9982834,0.000012571571],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.723322,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8078095,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9958632,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0617172,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2391551,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5566149},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2945444781","doi":"10.11575/jet.v51i3.68273","title":"Exploring the Intersection Between Culturally Responsive Pedagogy and Academic Integrity Among EAL Students in Canadian Higher Education","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Calgary","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Pedagogy; Academic integrity; Culturally sensitive; Sociology; Higher education; Cultural diversity; Cultural competence; Psychology; Political science; Social psychology","score_opus":0.050757512323051354,"score_gpt":0.3150000572524156,"score_spread":0.2642425449293642,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2945444781","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92726564,0.0017369381,0.0013719049,0.014954591,0.00010561001,0.00013003626,0.000048247315,0.00003279617,0.05435415],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9959462,0.0006433976,0.0004711554,0.0008567466,0.000009310416,0.00002565046,0.000012721923,0.000008626673,0.0020262038],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9875386,0.0042125587,0.00037924276,0.0008168537,0.0037417728,0.0033111027],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9706654,0.010209425,0.0035809227,0.001034413,0.007851445,0.0066583883],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013997638,0.00045072634,0.0006931749,0.004455815,0.04135137,0.012765249,0.0027037633,0.0019444978,0.0040346654],"category_scores_gemma":[0.038620297,0.000344289,0.00043160043,0.0044008796,0.022058865,0.004868639,0.014029122,0.005956877,0.00024664428],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020341336,0.00011424028,0.029404068,0.00018815398,0.000010988817,0.0002796151,0.9333301,0.000054514687,0.00049578544,0.010726039,0.0011693743,0.024206629],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000038904686,0.000040760937,0.029159486,0.00032139453,0.000012932413,0.00009626097,0.9483352,0.00008144738,0.0004439019,0.0017676514,0.019698802,0.00003828471],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.86876553,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9389666,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9980555,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09856785,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.20315795,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7151632},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2947736140","doi":"","title":"LibGuides: International Students' Guide to the Dalhousie Libraries: Avoid Plagiarism by Citing your Sources | The APA, MLA, Chicago, & Vancouver Citation Styles","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"libguides","venue":"","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Library science; Sociology; Data science; Computer science","score_opus":0.020406083521578657,"score_gpt":0.31424772949241336,"score_spread":0.29384164597083473,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2947736140","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0022314484,0.005827983,0.007948295,0.034791317,0.004599879,0.00068133324,0.014624045,0.037611194,0.8916845],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0031985168,0.00335514,0.0076693934,0.0020540985,0.000597134,0.00035356052,0.004350099,0.004772799,0.9736492],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99695253,0.00041619662,0.0003564401,0.00016053661,0.0018539493,0.00026031287],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9835443,0.0029653297,0.0006786797,0.0015455527,0.008462944,0.002803285],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0073339967,0.0016829267,0.0014368315,0.014320947,0.00887312,0.021849958,0.0027750663,0.003946608,0.33096015],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021418883,0.0017960458,0.00059940416,0.014348336,0.0029802478,0.012974808,0.007001776,0.0043976926,0.2899248],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000048696656,0.000017265123,0.00017203693,0.00003306267,0.0000011241056,0.0000168038,0.0002610953,0.000015087313,0.000038281636,0.0011220775,0.96002805,0.03829035],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004072003,0.000003180714,0.00057867274,0.000077457014,0.0000017558856,0.000023685541,0.0003526417,0.00004269106,0.00007870178,0.0006384612,0.99818736,0.000011327291],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06581847,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.22158486,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9960534,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004433292,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.030892367,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.95430416},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2948251768","doi":"10.1007/s11948-019-00112-4","title":"Misconduct and Misbehavior Related to Authorship Disagreements in Collaborative Science","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science and Engineering Ethics","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":81,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences; Fonds de Recherche du Québec - Santé; National Institutes of Health","keywords":"Scientific misconduct; Psychology; Multidisciplinary approach; Hostility; Research integrity; Social psychology; Social science; Public relations; Sociology; Political science; Medicine; Alternative medicine","score_opus":0.037397476199452065,"score_gpt":0.3625665209387409,"score_spread":0.32516904473928887,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2948251768","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96806586,0.001576205,0.0044979304,0.01193266,0.0001352626,0.00015871196,0.00012399176,0.00004883144,0.013460637],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982698,0.00015029898,0.0007021149,0.00030496402,0.000080975355,0.000054002314,0.000033086155,0.000010678635,0.00039409386],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.79758745,0.15128063,0.018186629,0.0060810074,0.021616913,0.005247393],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.0779978,0.75594527,0.113607645,0.019293936,0.025865495,0.00728989],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.11900774,0.00033247017,0.0008147524,0.008871816,0.00861712,0.006068826,0.0024946148,0.006953667,0.0051339213],"category_scores_gemma":[0.67088354,0.00057369046,0.00094860996,0.006320048,0.0075760046,0.0076381387,0.006884156,0.008075938,0.0005983742],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010047049,0.0009047429,0.86433715,0.00037593383,0.00033624895,0.0020267714,0.050827526,0.0014811776,0.000262334,0.02057462,0.0043051564,0.053563572],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026917318,0.00091373804,0.6886446,0.0018901881,0.000627404,0.008479569,0.08884228,0.022733083,0.0020969827,0.17299862,0.012190991,0.00031337744],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032318055,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0036323348,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99304634,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0050220266,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008259609,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6293806},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"domain":"incentives","study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"domain":"methods","study_design":"design_other","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2949136345","doi":"","title":"LibGuides: International Students' Guide to the Dalhousie Libraries: What is Plagiarism?","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"libguides","venue":"","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Library science; Political science; Geography; Computer science","score_opus":0.02291004324985799,"score_gpt":0.33931486728405286,"score_spread":0.31640482403419484,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2949136345","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0042988616,0.028071202,0.0074459156,0.14555979,0.0063077635,0.00057965214,0.012220265,0.016720528,0.77879614],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.006221513,0.008782076,0.0042472593,0.006980793,0.0009614422,0.00020408203,0.0023739936,0.0021532932,0.9680756],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99846447,0.00029721632,0.00015432516,0.00010207044,0.0007711594,0.0002106854],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.990184,0.0022298566,0.00046481533,0.00044024186,0.0044265436,0.0022545143],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0041279206,0.0009712291,0.0008299976,0.007341565,0.005464603,0.013789969,0.001741104,0.0051048556,0.1784183],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0112045305,0.00087115524,0.00036176955,0.006790935,0.0026766362,0.010918022,0.005117003,0.004621669,0.11408048],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000062758295,0.00001884332,0.0004166462,0.000050758576,8.728707e-7,0.00004052643,0.0007263089,0.000024710307,0.000053357064,0.0015902551,0.94858193,0.04848947],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000020682576,0.0000036139818,0.0006441833,0.00013596719,9.602985e-7,0.00003776357,0.00077346724,0.000037216374,0.000064936845,0.00056713325,0.99772364,0.000009092154],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05531222,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.18102127,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99489516,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004451667,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016240068,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.59686863},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"other","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"},{"model":"gpt","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"other","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W2952264314","doi":"10.48550/arxiv.0906.4019","title":"On the prevalence and scientific impact of duplicate publications in different scientific fields (1980-2007)","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"ArXiv.org","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Metadata; Library science; Field (mathematics); Scientific literature; Scientific field; Data science; Information retrieval; Geography; Computer science; World Wide Web; Mathematics; Biology; Engineering","score_opus":0.07229518415060894,"score_gpt":0.3446323455733842,"score_spread":0.27233716142277525,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2952264314","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9613622,0.019723762,0.001281332,0.0014422549,0.00015536998,0.000066464454,0.009692339,0.00008232796,0.00619386],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98567736,0.0048970333,0.0013293179,0.00015977345,0.00024088036,0.00006455505,0.0065197335,0.000033165317,0.0010781701],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9623334,0.0066546765,0.008222606,0.0038633079,0.017564159,0.0013618201],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.57336843,0.2218593,0.11819386,0.023136182,0.05745578,0.005986507],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.037625603,0.00033183652,0.0013511499,0.043337658,0.001620717,0.003377903,0.0015072785,0.0011108795,0.001522723],"category_scores_gemma":[0.19016272,0.00029201384,0.0010572482,0.03852438,0.0019889183,0.0035595412,0.00440543,0.000950937,0.000559721],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003663491,0.00005003596,0.9308718,0.001206657,0.00062112784,0.0005478079,0.0051556355,0.00047281923,0.00077628804,0.0013201006,0.0031068719,0.05550454],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014388338,0.00007480268,0.98557985,0.00024930065,0.0002466821,0.001647212,0.0021552378,0.00033447047,0.0011055793,0.0010660677,0.0074836966,0.000042774183],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038253486,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029057884,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99888915,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002311776,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026018189,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19898558},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2953760407","doi":"10.11575/prism/36149","title":"Searching Public Websites within Canadian Higher Education: Academic Integrity Tutorials [Infographic]","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PRISM (University of Calgary)","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Infographic; Academic integrity; Higher education; Advertising; Public relations; World Wide Web; Political science; Computer science; Internet privacy; Library science; Business","score_opus":0.0269225477228169,"score_gpt":0.26409029710068765,"score_spread":0.23716774937787075,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2953760407","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.35221994,0.0049679074,0.0060526095,0.010542552,0.0006900843,0.0024670495,0.08068615,0.010173485,0.53220016],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.726244,0.0066188406,0.023224471,0.0026165105,0.00024618223,0.00052818184,0.043511357,0.0018995831,0.19511081],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980939,0.00027879642,0.000112539776,0.00009899903,0.0010362857,0.00037939206],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97947824,0.0050712796,0.0016926946,0.0008045952,0.010508707,0.0024445746],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002774763,0.00038057452,0.00032192786,0.009322177,0.0051859305,0.004031446,0.0009910214,0.00066231575,0.051728494],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021285405,0.00029846537,0.00027291646,0.011244142,0.0007512219,0.002140308,0.0020469325,0.0006734023,0.009160057],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021833394,0.0003805223,0.046628952,0.0022004226,0.00003779658,0.00041959214,0.022657365,0.00028911448,0.0023018597,0.0030690888,0.5209099,0.40088707],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026416888,0.00015113805,0.15465958,0.0009688793,0.0000679635,0.00023729239,0.02323976,0.0006844757,0.0041161724,0.00041375292,0.81528217,0.00015231443],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.76398426,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.90034366,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9993377,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009936597,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03670204,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47481132},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2967929375","doi":"10.1101/734137","title":"What difference do retractions make? An estimate of the epistemic impact of retractions on recent meta-analyses","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ottawa Public Health; Ottawa Hospital; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Sample size determination; Meta-analysis; Publication bias; Null hypothesis; Statistics; Psychology; Econometrics; Epistemology; Confidence interval; Mathematics; Philosophy; Medicine","score_opus":0.10901960773852816,"score_gpt":0.37662186296776434,"score_spread":0.2676022552292362,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2967929375","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.29370913,0.29611638,0.26321968,0.05780759,0.018425079,0.008115282,0.025553593,0.0019958157,0.035057485],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9253067,0.009872995,0.04707017,0.005688185,0.0034250256,0.0033998177,0.003166347,0.0004352866,0.0016356463],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.37440398,0.44508794,0.0774499,0.031247603,0.06737464,0.0044360384],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.025826955,0.90199405,0.038174562,0.022898328,0.010030933,0.0010751777],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.6263465,0.003421873,0.006123959,0.01974624,0.0027995529,0.009315415,0.0075209956,0.006522981,0.011031582],"category_scores_gemma":[0.8998464,0.0021549433,0.024834944,0.018787278,0.009294426,0.014712016,0.013242142,0.01259932,0.0016004209],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.011934376,0.00042602094,0.35460114,0.056585383,0.23296644,0.002245922,0.007972911,0.020478303,0.0016604895,0.032483574,0.026326658,0.25231877],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0035598623,0.004410139,0.44144675,0.04531164,0.2406917,0.0065458287,0.0054294723,0.046296805,0.007868228,0.1101437,0.086498395,0.0017974498],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029156364,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030671603,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99347705,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0040645283,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037502593,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.46078128},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"design_other","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2969243049","doi":"10.2196/13529","title":"Association of Online Learning Behavior and Learning Outcomes for Medical Students: Large-Scale Usage Data Analysis","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"JMIR Medical Education","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Leibniz-Gemeinschaft","keywords":"Multiple choice; Test (biology); Online learning; Medical education; Computer science; Scale (ratio); Psychology; Medicine; Multimedia; Significant difference","score_opus":0.018070022894283017,"score_gpt":0.41991967739626584,"score_spread":0.40184965450198284,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2969243049","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99518895,0.00008754387,0.0008107407,0.000035155088,0.0000054147345,0.00013860485,0.0033239035,0.00003241441,0.00037719577],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99386805,0.000057615307,0.0014297488,0.000018003993,0.0000142380395,0.0004556262,0.003922441,0.000016093307,0.00021818049],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9950906,0.0017611841,0.0007316336,0.0010520609,0.0010039866,0.00036043843],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9691473,0.017533932,0.0065763034,0.0027312571,0.00259825,0.0014129304],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005942979,0.00046048517,0.0008785404,0.0051892847,0.00050196913,0.001205469,0.00074126886,0.0008458856,0.0019294093],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017897319,0.00028906055,0.0012746467,0.00507763,0.00062051427,0.0012584938,0.0014530241,0.0009509687,0.0005883132],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013193866,0.00019941608,0.99346197,0.000047098678,0.0002861736,0.00004385472,0.00033649945,0.00029436898,0.00023597089,0.000035241283,0.00031412582,0.0046134437],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010111171,0.00023463742,0.99594706,0.000011520381,0.00006393462,0.00011443966,0.0005041532,0.0025153842,0.00017443011,0.00004148902,0.00036845135,0.000014416774],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037542954,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004119901,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005942979,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005559699,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00070604787,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.031429887},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2969989490","doi":"10.29252/ijn.32.117.1","title":"“Editorial Letter”Managing Authorship Conflicts: A Guide for Researchers","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Iran Journal of Nursing","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Providence Health Care; Centre for Health Evaluation and Outcome Sciences","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology","score_opus":0.15228249889406636,"score_gpt":0.43732889573621636,"score_spread":0.28504639684215,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2969989490","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0013910732,0.014362932,0.06263958,0.3355271,0.50194615,0.007430326,0.0018655295,0.014076392,0.060760986],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0070589385,0.021657344,0.17039672,0.20669556,0.4100497,0.014871904,0.002637627,0.0062729577,0.16035934],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.95661175,0.022066282,0.0075340224,0.0021082798,0.0105138,0.0011659656],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.75273305,0.08481008,0.023495715,0.0154578425,0.09861465,0.024888622],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04158548,0.0036816678,0.0034328045,0.0074269976,0.0064749797,0.015970942,0.0044999085,0.013283903,0.06518247],"category_scores_gemma":[0.19806144,0.002361017,0.0023647815,0.0049243397,0.006025355,0.01761914,0.006693146,0.015651222,0.11618306],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030306672,0.000046594105,0.000061572006,0.00034449337,0.000007177968,0.00021937212,0.00041957616,0.000064757216,0.00029964375,0.00086647965,0.96111643,0.036523722],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000042521486,0.000056035195,0.00011295309,0.00077503145,0.000009774468,0.0007843056,0.0005426417,0.00020100149,0.00016263228,0.005091807,0.99217564,0.000045641045],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00054897764,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013309068,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9867161,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024205144,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015239173,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21992767},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2971970606","doi":"10.18162/ritpu-2019-v16n2-02","title":"Introduction to special issue - From plagiarism to academic integrity : Which skills, which strategies ?","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue internationale des technologies en pédagogie universitaire","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec en Outaouais","funders":"","keywords":"Academic integrity; Research integrity; Academic dishonesty; Engineering ethics; Psychology; Cheating; Engineering; Social psychology","score_opus":0.016530242268633477,"score_gpt":0.28877873010992483,"score_spread":0.27224848784129135,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2971970606","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00037944704,0.013253359,0.0010285875,0.09466931,0.8557058,0.00020604666,0.0009713038,0.0004590103,0.033327237],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.003855542,0.019086203,0.0010766125,0.05779156,0.77326876,0.00029641666,0.0014891851,0.0006166649,0.14251915],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99683964,0.0004837417,0.00042087026,0.0003935148,0.0015153736,0.0003468743],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97883785,0.005744443,0.0015302941,0.0006846091,0.009924394,0.0032783893],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026440648,0.0020661692,0.0022583136,0.003709173,0.0022316426,0.008086923,0.002482429,0.0082090525,0.19008504],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017083084,0.00066863064,0.0017946169,0.0015243399,0.0014478333,0.007126748,0.0041839187,0.008378437,0.10275445],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014881673,0.000018126088,0.000052003106,0.00014405468,0.000002827623,0.000025198144,0.000018244678,0.000009459981,0.00010775263,0.00026941922,0.9891033,0.010234733],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020036889,0.00006458865,0.0011385878,0.000759313,0.000012010966,0.00033536286,0.00015322206,0.00006397329,0.0001624522,0.0015359287,0.9957296,0.000024885592],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014873757,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002511209,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99179095,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021531782,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027777574,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6358978},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2972587332","doi":"10.31468/cjsdwr.771","title":"A Foucauldian-Vygotskian Analysis of the Pedagogy of Academic Integrity","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Discourse and Writing/Rédactologie","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Academic integrity; Context (archaeology); Pedagogy; Meaning (existential); Sociology; Order (exchange); Higher education; Psychology; Mathematics education; Engineering ethics; Political science; Social psychology; Engineering; Law","score_opus":0.10145586437855182,"score_gpt":0.45798669598834363,"score_spread":0.3565308316097918,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2972587332","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12320921,0.0074877176,0.15592374,0.07262545,0.0006506081,0.00019908123,0.00006438975,0.00022273809,0.63961715],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9706479,0.0011899555,0.009727453,0.0006242662,0.00010358716,0.000121321595,0.000008786009,0.00005022005,0.017526496],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99406165,0.0039597317,0.00015155732,0.000432158,0.0010027665,0.0003921187],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9922367,0.005186567,0.0006532182,0.00058243,0.0009551185,0.00038596443],"candidate_categories":["sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007460118,0.00043686482,0.0004513739,0.0042593125,0.011194471,0.006776725,0.0015501287,0.0023772086,0.002747175],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010083316,0.00021953035,0.00038163993,0.0020348208,0.051684264,0.0058544157,0.0053295176,0.0056222538,0.00034561512],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000043990167,0.000012468594,0.00024037066,0.000032822783,0.0000011037741,0.000048227503,0.04213099,0.00009697562,0.00011963408,0.95058256,0.0005962286,0.006134156],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010797839,0.000037790884,0.0013430166,0.0002761084,0.00000735437,0.00024026995,0.035408065,0.0010043791,0.0015733197,0.78995425,0.17012477,0.000019984085],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008873343,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008422725,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9976228,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013661976,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009382329,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09912503},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2973097717","doi":"10.1111/jonm.12868","title":"Writing for publication—Implications of text recycling and cut and paste writing","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Nursing Management","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nursing management; Psychology; Medicine; Nursing","score_opus":0.04319384559076351,"score_gpt":0.3609937970459201,"score_spread":0.3177999514551566,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2973097717","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.024601692,0.033265565,0.018914172,0.8304229,0.010973305,0.0006611675,0.00025044332,0.00031108275,0.08059975],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.62685806,0.03754396,0.05112761,0.23613028,0.0151283005,0.002033009,0.0002388452,0.001502648,0.02943736],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.6073703,0.25905713,0.028463218,0.016462363,0.08095984,0.007687114],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.14167993,0.7347982,0.046004545,0.022367582,0.045364838,0.009784977],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.25342137,0.0011447939,0.0012226613,0.008010554,0.01574542,0.02914082,0.011321731,0.014665246,0.023127532],"category_scores_gemma":[0.6747742,0.0013106195,0.0022328843,0.007990935,0.05509913,0.042273656,0.015551604,0.01352422,0.006953469],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007086461,0.00047466118,0.016032888,0.004765892,0.00023451494,0.006011309,0.10727698,0.001035303,0.00039973226,0.28660354,0.20650913,0.3699475],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003691688,0.00042644865,0.011765227,0.018246133,0.00018793117,0.01034747,0.13662626,0.0022181221,0.0013087377,0.43179396,0.38629776,0.00041269878],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008870588,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00908272,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98533475,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017193122,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.036772065,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.92066437},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2975812787","doi":"10.11575/prism/36485","title":"Plagiarism perceptions among post-secondary students and faculty - A case study: Research project brief","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Open MIND","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Medical education; Perception; Mathematics education; Pedagogy; Medicine","score_opus":0.15725622956429125,"score_gpt":0.4944760656588576,"score_spread":0.33721983609456635,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2975812787","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.998553,0.000071268536,0.00014255237,0.00016531035,0.000003953969,0.00018720544,0.000029128243,0.0000033611861,0.0008443597],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99799925,0.00016238038,0.00033467266,0.00007578068,0.000007475462,0.00017812241,0.000025049085,0.0000024014703,0.0012148607],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99333864,0.003083066,0.00043404227,0.0005791692,0.0011407535,0.0014243084],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9877593,0.0050704526,0.0021456566,0.000466731,0.0019656266,0.0025922863],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007700237,0.0004423808,0.00075444015,0.0026108827,0.012426008,0.004242566,0.0016262408,0.002471111,0.00459295],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013247671,0.00052292243,0.0005603982,0.0028691334,0.004078804,0.0024627352,0.003700575,0.0027197408,0.00042704688],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001565663,0.00299555,0.100880094,0.00025854565,0.000014010674,0.0036306388,0.87148935,0.000074667136,0.0016104488,0.00077823276,0.00055228744,0.017559621],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024581097,0.0010197734,0.06289534,0.00009982944,0.000010626206,0.0012103724,0.929103,0.00016317183,0.0015345117,0.00018382276,0.0037240533,0.00003087185],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03205849,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06455681,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9975289,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009571181,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009756601,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06944412},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["research_integrity"],"domain":null,"study_design":"qualitative","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"domain":"methods","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2976812174","doi":"10.1145/3349266.3351369","title":"How Selective True-False Questions Reward Student Recognition","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Ignorance; Set (abstract data type); Class (philosophy); Psychology; Mathematics education; Selection (genetic algorithm); Correlation; Computer science; Test (biology); Artificial intelligence; Social psychology; Cognitive psychology; Mathematics; Epistemology","score_opus":0.025518126396834737,"score_gpt":0.31806220423198406,"score_spread":0.2925440778351493,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2976812174","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98277515,0.00025351066,0.009509244,0.0013477012,0.00005262402,0.00007421438,0.0001856936,0.00029683375,0.0055052135],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963152,0.000038375558,0.0024152524,0.00010926539,0.000022795753,0.000027863032,0.00011136075,0.00003775754,0.000922169],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98205954,0.009544584,0.0010567572,0.0021641767,0.0035132242,0.0016617705],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6125084,0.3064854,0.035583902,0.023900328,0.012292455,0.00922951],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020627128,0.0006270751,0.0008305451,0.0010639598,0.0007456949,0.0030436013,0.0010770321,0.0018795138,0.0062520127],"category_scores_gemma":[0.20207828,0.0003612171,0.0006295375,0.00075663585,0.0013893294,0.003992191,0.0022133947,0.0022017604,0.0017425233],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0058529926,0.0020328416,0.6928547,0.00031999862,0.00042145664,0.00025152697,0.0017699588,0.022272626,0.014778067,0.010468444,0.0050509633,0.24392647],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035820552,0.0073079015,0.7684006,0.00010492087,0.00045638267,0.00086192985,0.0019252195,0.12607062,0.049143195,0.037997823,0.00713616,0.00023695479],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014025852,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016397615,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020627128,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012160498,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012593804,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.109087944},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2977875657","doi":"","title":"Combatting Plagiarism from a Transformational Viewpoint","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Transformative Learning","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Transformational leadership; Academic integrity; Convention; Perception; Plagiarism detection; Psychology; Pedagogy; Mathematics education; Sociology; Computer science; Social psychology; Social science; Information retrieval","score_opus":0.011269328890205974,"score_gpt":0.2803632722449976,"score_spread":0.2690939433547916,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2977875657","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6008038,0.0065271566,0.13226388,0.07083461,0.00078452664,0.00050972844,0.000089145826,0.0018822195,0.18630496],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9754074,0.0011908974,0.012582397,0.0012215583,0.00014979632,0.00006429868,0.00003783783,0.00012498764,0.009220929],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98285055,0.008671978,0.00071447884,0.000919984,0.005992473,0.00085046404],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9255581,0.03682047,0.011720127,0.01097632,0.011039828,0.0038851763],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015530701,0.00049512944,0.0004832637,0.0026652592,0.0046222704,0.009848782,0.0014126161,0.0017185688,0.0056962334],"category_scores_gemma":[0.063869715,0.00024157643,0.00041694558,0.0013376042,0.0075686583,0.00880218,0.0077287,0.004590206,0.0017652158],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001733053,0.00080527813,0.03442411,0.0012487882,0.00008084233,0.0011121086,0.24659023,0.0009350427,0.018797629,0.075965494,0.012271846,0.6075954],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000104906605,0.0018952921,0.053341735,0.0024730787,0.00015760877,0.0052508083,0.24036002,0.0065885205,0.053070687,0.22086653,0.41562957,0.00026134084],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000518178,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00096043065,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9982814,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021702473,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00504378,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0821352},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["research_integrity"],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"domain":"methods","study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"commentary","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2978192139","doi":"10.3968/11243","title":"Investigation on Filing of Regulatory Documents in China","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian social science","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constraint (computer-aided design); Mechanism (biology); GRASP; Function (biology); China; Computer science; Business; Political science; Law; Epistemology; Engineering","score_opus":0.018342337661159724,"score_gpt":0.27498601609515,"score_spread":0.2566436784339903,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2978192139","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9671349,0.00071804586,0.00059330236,0.003426896,0.000083741324,0.00023658302,0.00029003152,0.00004847949,0.027468031],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9849783,0.0006918192,0.00047180083,0.0007499724,0.000061438994,0.000057706355,0.00023400247,0.000014490555,0.012740487],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9839655,0.0014539091,0.0015935708,0.0010162217,0.009144926,0.0028258965],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9691682,0.0086034015,0.008151626,0.0018308829,0.010423887,0.0018219682],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01329183,0.00031617846,0.0004997951,0.0071972143,0.008778163,0.005068215,0.0027368015,0.0030281085,0.005419932],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03098797,0.0005141388,0.000589878,0.0079927575,0.0026435116,0.0021098997,0.0022484611,0.0023142453,0.0004674909],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00045160478,0.000435347,0.7058443,0.0012080247,0.00019561808,0.015047414,0.060468588,0.0025484262,0.0056658657,0.06710285,0.023599476,0.11743248],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001248274,0.0003235059,0.8649348,0.00045738896,0.00025298932,0.0018538455,0.030146694,0.0061114626,0.005097414,0.0046640416,0.08584967,0.0001833833],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.19371337,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15781629,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9969719,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01677118,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.036299407,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38517165},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2979220330","doi":"10.18806/tesl.v36i1.1309","title":"Revisiting Proofreading in Higher Education: Toward an Institutional Response to Editors Canada’s Guidelines for Ethical Editing of Student Texts","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"TESL Canada Journal","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Proofreading; Academic writing; Technical writing; Higher education; Sociology; Pedagogy; Psychology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.08673298663121183,"score_gpt":0.40243627266301923,"score_spread":0.3157032860318074,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2979220330","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0030659041,0.0061672633,0.0052081537,0.95828485,0.0134029705,0.00021650294,0.000044047913,0.00027062534,0.01333969],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.13239773,0.008718924,0.05083634,0.7462971,0.010400938,0.0004362614,0.00013945975,0.00095664855,0.04981664],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.6695894,0.08652974,0.042118337,0.016800981,0.1614126,0.023548996],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.36306366,0.26928768,0.04514631,0.0198278,0.25817642,0.044498153],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.20039935,0.0010158448,0.0019318333,0.004276935,0.04463893,0.057590056,0.013286459,0.032981116,0.0026997186],"category_scores_gemma":[0.39185116,0.001981052,0.0014867568,0.003801797,0.05921948,0.011834448,0.021640679,0.06433176,0.0015536731],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000045270197,0.000085093896,0.0019691098,0.00058447465,0.000036192367,0.0010121277,0.060029555,0.00043779452,0.0011724437,0.12759629,0.76057816,0.046453472],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022208771,0.000022902392,0.0012096127,0.001074365,0.000023606575,0.00023909424,0.015597952,0.0004413855,0.0011300697,0.013391872,0.96665025,0.0001968122],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6554518,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.78378844,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9670189,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.095633894,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.46505478,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98604995},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2979409885","doi":"10.11575/prism/36597","title":"Academic Integrity: Faculty Development Needs for Canadian Higher Education - Research Project Brief","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PRISM (University of Calgary)","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Academic integrity; Higher education; Engineering ethics; Political science; Public relations; Medical education; Engineering; Medicine","score_opus":0.0781100110273855,"score_gpt":0.34198458303158247,"score_spread":0.26387457200419695,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2979409885","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.50465924,0.01289968,0.003353906,0.20861097,0.001434205,0.024717614,0.027784396,0.00033831986,0.21620166],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87896276,0.01603094,0.020300442,0.008587525,0.00016538994,0.012507533,0.008326551,0.00006224367,0.055056598],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98638815,0.0028046395,0.0008078848,0.0006677198,0.0054241642,0.0039073946],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.929366,0.0099395,0.0025660356,0.0014248114,0.035442874,0.021260893],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.026916351,0.00040664678,0.00048404976,0.0047992626,0.021119826,0.008636634,0.002885587,0.00217873,0.0071566533],"category_scores_gemma":[0.033135653,0.00068417395,0.0005051722,0.010767468,0.0030922808,0.0038587218,0.0044479,0.0031021023,0.00070489856],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023852217,0.0018811502,0.101150416,0.004246063,0.00004504404,0.0009693287,0.18380806,0.0008729564,0.0014689635,0.034333028,0.34821922,0.32276723],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000677848,0.00031174408,0.15327145,0.001826447,0.00004846376,0.0001868204,0.49452636,0.000516257,0.00083252904,0.0017301278,0.34656763,0.00011436793],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96514237,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9830468,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9978213,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.18732272,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.54024,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9425905},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2979485266","doi":"10.17605/osf.io/x2va3","title":"Academic Integrity: Faculty Development Needs for Canadian Higher Education","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints)","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Academic integrity; Higher education; Medical education; Engineering ethics; Business; Economic growth; Medicine; Engineering; Economics","score_opus":0.038598521381848896,"score_gpt":0.323848940711174,"score_spread":0.2852504193293251,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2979485266","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8870096,0.0018576634,0.00033064664,0.06920882,0.00015708672,0.00010768247,0.00060134457,0.000037708614,0.040689435],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9939713,0.0009440586,0.00036711336,0.0012803187,0.000023256074,0.000023270053,0.00014783624,0.000009138078,0.0032336907],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98386866,0.002230155,0.0006145321,0.0005681579,0.0074385055,0.005279914],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8762989,0.013291818,0.013378319,0.0013553561,0.048412777,0.047262833],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010508609,0.0002649058,0.00048760814,0.0035299254,0.02635518,0.008901181,0.0027773925,0.0019036008,0.008773824],"category_scores_gemma":[0.055739835,0.00030367787,0.0004274802,0.0059680208,0.00622461,0.003575288,0.004773942,0.0035287447,0.00045821373],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023766482,0.00042555705,0.42786634,0.0008941889,0.00007306549,0.0010736106,0.36350057,0.0004329596,0.0015592834,0.018301541,0.037351508,0.14828372],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001904215,0.00011441449,0.3727859,0.00049323234,0.000026832795,0.000307884,0.56056035,0.0004015704,0.00046233696,0.0021975588,0.062501065,0.00012981376],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9597302,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9751406,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9980964,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1047027,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2604027,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.75967485},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2981344291","doi":"10.11575/prism/36463","title":"Academic Integrity: A Global Community of Scholars","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Open MIND","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Academic integrity; Political science; Engineering ethics; Public relations; Sociology; Engineering","score_opus":0.09031800578332715,"score_gpt":0.4061464135650313,"score_spread":0.3158284077817041,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2981344291","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0029055749,0.04603829,0.0006148187,0.7659279,0.028511789,0.00006435105,0.00016174227,0.0002446114,0.15553094],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.13694315,0.06562128,0.0032782662,0.22266375,0.034729723,0.00015727791,0.00060808373,0.00083311455,0.53516537],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9877368,0.0030632874,0.0004119987,0.0008108478,0.005573165,0.0024038183],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96956015,0.00555197,0.0015838435,0.0020893163,0.008434982,0.0127798235],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01408684,0.0008192331,0.0011538211,0.0038102583,0.026713708,0.03474078,0.0017444396,0.009226157,0.07743271],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026358504,0.0006854411,0.0005399359,0.0067835776,0.017893942,0.017874302,0.019765697,0.009755727,0.012884684],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015172576,0.000017099383,0.00040857983,0.00015435097,0.0000049524656,0.00016894455,0.01338177,0.000027384867,0.00027914453,0.02565401,0.9112869,0.048601706],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000019888528,0.0000063565944,0.00038863678,0.00015683609,0.0000020838604,0.000055797664,0.011191326,0.000007430648,0.000030151463,0.0029772269,0.9851736,0.000008722739],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03237066,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08357429,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99077386,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01055756,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0377452,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2590382},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2981460216","doi":"10.1007/s40979-019-0045-1","title":"Developing a university-wide academic integrity E-learning tutorial: a Canadian case","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal for Educational Integrity","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":49,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"MacEwan University","funders":"","keywords":"Academic integrity; Misconduct; Experiential learning; Mathematics education; Higher education; Learning development; Personal Integrity; Scientific integrity; Computer science; Psychology; Pedagogy; Engineering ethics; Political science; Engineering; Library science","score_opus":0.0487292806891621,"score_gpt":0.38049782602163357,"score_spread":0.33176854533247147,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2981460216","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8470608,0.00095627067,0.012617581,0.038781893,0.00040114307,0.0009644963,0.00021110971,0.00025495357,0.09875175],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9513005,0.0011783547,0.01473183,0.0025827624,0.000047771016,0.00016823177,0.00009935486,0.00011109149,0.029780047],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99235016,0.003031725,0.0002101889,0.00037748765,0.0019295783,0.0021008863],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98479897,0.0026692173,0.000540952,0.00044980325,0.0036628554,0.00787815],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0078420825,0.00044781374,0.00030822903,0.0013092939,0.022199439,0.00500901,0.003441404,0.0042803725,0.004149712],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017536992,0.0003420229,0.00043015054,0.0018774307,0.0043565147,0.0023857006,0.005717468,0.004213221,0.0005964584],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027056807,0.0046353345,0.052062497,0.0007757348,0.000045099212,0.096717976,0.39481086,0.0071836202,0.0071770363,0.09297854,0.081838705,0.26150402],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008779335,0.00089076324,0.021911051,0.0007580754,0.00005371339,0.018531099,0.43001682,0.011892678,0.007943418,0.006443247,0.5011952,0.0002761607],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.64694893,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.85321635,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9957196,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.038168486,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.073569484,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7102605},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2982200297","doi":"","title":"Perceptions Du Plagiat Par De Futurs Enseignants Quebecois : Dimensions Ethiques et Pedagogiques","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Education / Revue canadienne de l éducation","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Perception; Population; Pedagogy; Medical education; Sociology; Medicine","score_opus":0.051452125791381725,"score_gpt":0.3195271953409599,"score_spread":0.26807506954957816,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2982200297","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9948965,0.0002857032,0.00022188608,0.00097489246,0.0000074086693,0.000026725684,0.000038461465,0.0000067099577,0.0035417348],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997489,0.00018428518,0.000086385,0.00008705904,0.0000039109204,0.000014691395,0.000018365856,0.0000032007886,0.0021131071],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99315006,0.0029427446,0.00032821912,0.0003418229,0.0025874146,0.0006497063],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96088505,0.015448601,0.009583768,0.0009807206,0.0089402255,0.004161701],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0073208027,0.00025541545,0.00045224253,0.003033138,0.010127022,0.0035737827,0.00085424713,0.0009241209,0.0035747802],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03088759,0.00035687402,0.00020824159,0.002302967,0.0062181326,0.0020863137,0.0021022072,0.0020177767,0.00019005146],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000068093585,0.00012478081,0.252793,0.00009353961,0.000021377775,0.00051754253,0.72165215,0.00013408404,0.0012624976,0.0020539071,0.0014504185,0.019828595],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007605269,0.000116878095,0.5067273,0.00011699799,0.0000124915005,0.00040372796,0.4752367,0.00037005753,0.00041108383,0.00036229167,0.016169835,0.000065013206],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7429756,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.81073135,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9990759,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.024475845,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020250529,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.51707613},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2982586741","doi":"10.1136/bmj.l6320","title":"Research integrity: UK guidelines are updated to ensure misconduct reporting","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"BMJ","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Research integrity; Scientific misconduct; Misconduct; Transparency (behavior); Scientific integrity; Sanctions; Quarter (Canadian coin); Political science; House of Commons; Academic integrity; Public relations; Engineering ethics; Engineering; Medicine; Law","score_opus":0.3034726249822061,"score_gpt":0.5108103985235424,"score_spread":0.20733777354133626,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2982586741","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0016106482,0.02986306,0.04440307,0.6772572,0.06625858,0.011839643,0.01158348,0.008449054,0.14873526],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0332661,0.079105206,0.21178067,0.34534335,0.023758695,0.053133823,0.032906428,0.009285482,0.21142022],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.46503663,0.25345123,0.13825302,0.011100817,0.11632461,0.01583365],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.16612083,0.23317075,0.06062515,0.1113672,0.40812176,0.020594385],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.27976292,0.002503312,0.012801644,0.015189157,0.0095031485,0.039550744,0.013461182,0.055697147,0.056702543],"category_scores_gemma":[0.63548666,0.0057385713,0.0079751015,0.022862623,0.02147495,0.02088871,0.013493871,0.045958493,0.12289654],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015899187,0.00009154653,0.00033498096,0.002742458,0.00006959539,0.000188063,0.0018305666,0.000097139,0.000348949,0.009901867,0.94042236,0.04381344],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014277779,0.00008020696,0.0013237344,0.007182497,0.000055598182,0.00033645565,0.0008421927,0.00019198805,0.0005840384,0.007833873,0.98129016,0.00013635833],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014056429,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018498814,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94430286,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016856274,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1114596,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.88818055},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"commentary","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"domain":"methods","study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"commentary","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W2982990926","doi":"10.1186/s12940-019-0527-x","title":"How can the integrity of occupational and environmental health research be maintained in the presence of conflicting interests?","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Health","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Safeguarding; Public relations; Government (linguistics); Public health; Incentive; Causation; Scientific evidence; Business; Precautionary principle; Scientific misconduct; Environmental health; Political science; Medicine; Law; Alternative medicine; Economics; Nursing","score_opus":0.10361905913431246,"score_gpt":0.4073051824307453,"score_spread":0.30368612329643285,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2982990926","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":"methods","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00087546255,0.017643746,0.0052802484,0.9626394,0.009939604,0.00005168967,0.000031768668,0.000025767984,0.0035123238],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.122444496,0.034709934,0.024957389,0.7683999,0.046110045,0.0006221676,0.00009182518,0.00015940223,0.0025047879],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.36820266,0.49306545,0.041523594,0.03013594,0.056263536,0.010808858],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.11780758,0.7637007,0.028285814,0.03161122,0.048971046,0.009623612],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.591615,0.0013983106,0.007126073,0.0073030614,0.018581923,0.054739222,0.01487801,0.06481695,0.0034675153],"category_scores_gemma":[0.73629624,0.0023125494,0.0034649,0.0067514395,0.12980735,0.061552953,0.016874734,0.04726891,0.0018774236],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00042076834,0.00012862938,0.0025032214,0.006232405,0.001260401,0.0017641773,0.047003355,0.0012133735,0.00061506376,0.62078446,0.20399058,0.11408367],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000104007755,0.00007206728,0.0006031266,0.008052402,0.0002731376,0.0004577236,0.012522516,0.000581495,0.0005346378,0.76044667,0.21611954,0.00023273722],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006707544,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009113473,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93518305,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.020187145,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.093132906,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.50361145},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2984848350","doi":"10.5430/ijfr.v11n1p189","title":"Academic Cheating and Characteristics of Accounting Students","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Financial Research","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Direcció General de Recerca, Generalitat de Catalunya; Direktorat Riset dan Pengabdian Masyarakat","keywords":"Cheating; Psychology; Honesty; Incentive; Rationalization (economics); Bivariate analysis; Sanctions; Regression analysis; Social psychology; Accounting; Mathematics education; Political science; Management; Business; Statistics; Economics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.05962648940013091,"score_gpt":0.4600436545566419,"score_spread":0.400417165156511,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2984848350","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9991918,0.000035065626,0.000039916256,0.00007524426,0.0000023906784,0.0000051846646,0.00003354276,0.0000016976198,0.0006151117],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9997166,0.000025338624,0.000034690154,0.000011281249,0.0000033140948,0.000002571374,0.000032995642,6.0984104e-7,0.00017260342],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99858785,0.00032574273,0.00025021407,0.00008379955,0.0005268019,0.00022565067],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9780156,0.003639482,0.0133366,0.0008205814,0.0017563989,0.0024313242],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016126627,0.00014654304,0.0002208747,0.0012247296,0.0005771121,0.0013120477,0.0002836772,0.0004978091,0.0026487038],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012725919,0.00012750008,0.00033540305,0.0011167624,0.00055528776,0.0005616934,0.0005454937,0.0009600386,0.00044776488],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003041346,0.00010729004,0.9972543,0.000005607188,0.000011269047,0.00004154859,0.00040116376,0.000035333564,0.00013481465,0.00004074687,0.000047993508,0.0018895173],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000014746224,0.000098697914,0.997891,0.0000060570264,0.000007941298,0.0001594406,0.001181798,0.00021700656,0.00012583619,0.00006835243,0.00023464966,0.000007663329],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001388093,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014783011,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9995022,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00037780555,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00049961766,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0088608265},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2990195677","doi":"10.1007/s40979-019-0047-z","title":"Are Canadian professors teaching the skills and knowledge students need to prevent plagiarism?","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal for Educational Integrity","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec en Outaouais","funders":"","keywords":"Library science; Redaction; Plagiarism detection; Pedagogy; Psychology; Sociology; Mathematics education; Computer science; Art; Literature","score_opus":0.03032029235692155,"score_gpt":0.42519208248398427,"score_spread":0.3948717901270627,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2990195677","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7534019,0.007347276,0.0006251468,0.13295624,0.0013453792,0.0002746292,0.0021760801,0.00023171863,0.10164162],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9555367,0.00401194,0.0008364767,0.006216517,0.00017698294,0.00008857045,0.00046711447,0.000035118243,0.032630518],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99628323,0.0004182162,0.000105663086,0.00023608559,0.0014461334,0.0015106949],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9756139,0.0012385688,0.0027333843,0.00041061398,0.009128485,0.010875137],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028806087,0.00022948263,0.0004896776,0.0013300932,0.011327652,0.004567692,0.0015372451,0.001422596,0.028976066],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015237712,0.00037119447,0.0004404125,0.00354037,0.0020302692,0.0016901385,0.0010628231,0.0011179604,0.0024616614],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00030598877,0.00033458308,0.4210664,0.0007635798,0.00006276766,0.0009399338,0.039653815,0.0003518087,0.002776761,0.00517333,0.2738509,0.2547201],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005717027,0.00012338372,0.7059264,0.00050627085,0.000058951642,0.00026435137,0.08929036,0.00025016067,0.0006054977,0.00046008654,0.20235841,0.00009902056],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.92150396,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9780477,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9985774,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.053027324,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.11191782,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38474196},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["research_integrity"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":true,"about_ca_topic":true,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"domain":"methods","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":true,"about_ca_topic":true,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W2990662480","doi":"10.1111/jan.14273","title":"How to minimize research misconduct? Priorities for academics in nursing","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"editorial","venue":"Journal of Advanced Nursing","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Misconduct; Nursing; Nursing research; Scientific misconduct; Psychology; MEDLINE; Medical education; Medicine; Political science; Alternative medicine; Law","score_opus":0.07564282463720501,"score_gpt":0.4601518012753888,"score_spread":0.3845089766381838,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2990662480","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0027473627,0.019446442,0.00510376,0.9614219,0.0047538555,0.00019688132,0.00002859577,0.0001623347,0.0061389143],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.28352097,0.07908736,0.06215131,0.5388132,0.016706852,0.0031549996,0.0003117804,0.00055457454,0.015698992],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.55630255,0.33803293,0.019799318,0.014296856,0.048359126,0.02320922],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.25331214,0.40422118,0.03946918,0.027521368,0.11037127,0.16510485],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.43439123,0.0018775818,0.0047602416,0.0088194,0.033175994,0.05825814,0.013187244,0.04394843,0.014528545],"category_scores_gemma":[0.61140746,0.0021832504,0.0027253039,0.0064789657,0.049714573,0.08116382,0.0474804,0.051830307,0.009617374],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00032279023,0.00052543025,0.008357254,0.005653434,0.00022028983,0.0012914591,0.093613125,0.00065287214,0.00051773846,0.12363708,0.2964081,0.46880043],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001823802,0.00053351285,0.0048428257,0.020907577,0.00014791547,0.0017831549,0.16637458,0.0009104985,0.0006553339,0.3655692,0.43762743,0.00046557427],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0063319393,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009373993,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9560516,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.020936385,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1991538,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6974963},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"domain":"methods","study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"editorial","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"domain":"methods","study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"editorial","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W2991996678","doi":"10.1007/s40979-019-0046-0","title":"Interinstitutional perspectives on contract cheating: a qualitative narrative exploration from Canada","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal for Educational Integrity","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":36,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Mount Royal University; Bow Valley College; University of Calgary","funders":"Mount Royal University","keywords":"Cheating; Outsourcing; Work (physics); Narrative; Public relations; Political science; Psychological contract; Psychological intervention; Higher education; Business; Sociology; Psychology; Social psychology; Law; Engineering","score_opus":0.06651198758456238,"score_gpt":0.43757824429008024,"score_spread":0.37106625670551785,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2991996678","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97077674,0.0015200858,0.0014015725,0.0105021745,0.00013123827,0.00021234954,0.00022321314,0.000028221964,0.015204417],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99545383,0.00075528456,0.00033001494,0.00082777254,0.000013139893,0.00009136669,0.000047308873,0.000029096549,0.002452187],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.96933293,0.01868378,0.0008825408,0.0014848573,0.0033860458,0.006229745],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95078975,0.031124245,0.0036920987,0.0013723174,0.006085999,0.006935617],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021474043,0.0010410333,0.001623794,0.0043719877,0.05314288,0.017317638,0.0054629133,0.0042973286,0.0041912636],"category_scores_gemma":[0.036299072,0.0012023745,0.0006316849,0.0070404354,0.041868664,0.007943693,0.017968245,0.011301471,0.0003573157],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008035596,0.0000086115515,0.0007733706,0.000023560673,0.0000014783054,0.00022708364,0.99678934,0.000016826672,0.00006823362,0.001341148,0.0002269704,0.00051545235],"study_design_scores_gemma":[5.7002944e-7,0.0000026085272,0.00025401064,0.000039584775,7.913675e-7,0.000023352322,0.9974179,0.000021270787,0.000023567056,0.000093552466,0.0021171076,0.0000056145723],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7396964,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8013631,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9957027,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08312257,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08901003,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6030992},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2992157477","doi":"10.47678/cjhe.v36i1.183525","title":"Understanding Academic Misconduct","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Higher Education","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":202,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Misconduct; Academic integrity; Honour; Higher education; Academic community; Learning development; Psychology; Scientific misconduct; Institutional research; Quality (philosophy); Public relations; Academic achievement; Cheating; Political science; Sociology; Medical education; Pedagogy; Social psychology; Law; Social science","score_opus":0.11122332580880782,"score_gpt":0.3427327548328886,"score_spread":0.23150942902408078,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2992157477","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1469767,0.032291185,0.043723628,0.32470402,0.0008419642,0.0003104437,0.00024691896,0.00019452265,0.45071062],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95757556,0.015817726,0.0057755434,0.009992296,0.00040317196,0.00010224873,0.00014971207,0.00003825915,0.0101454705],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9576391,0.018630022,0.0025449698,0.0027682113,0.013110986,0.005306798],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.84649634,0.09276893,0.01734934,0.006929604,0.030655574,0.0058001443],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04526416,0.0007363387,0.00084926793,0.015694669,0.021950277,0.024024343,0.0049481713,0.010524561,0.0045950282],"category_scores_gemma":[0.13182789,0.0006257011,0.0008044756,0.006833518,0.04780593,0.031130172,0.013342745,0.0096367,0.0008387064],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020175723,0.00006375843,0.0342195,0.00038995157,0.000032452328,0.0012864893,0.24680793,0.0009892085,0.00016486987,0.62066954,0.015023543,0.08033264],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008388384,0.00004141768,0.013656301,0.0020680646,0.000042689808,0.0017015574,0.2111689,0.0018784511,0.00040127104,0.55078024,0.21817507,0.00007758657],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.14692998,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.094698526,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9894754,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.038440466,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04857439,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29214948},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2993344217","doi":"10.47678/cjhe.v41i1.2173","title":"Research Integrity/Misconduct Policies of Canadian Universities","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Higher Education","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Carleton University","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Queen's University; Dalhousie University; University of Alberta; Cape Breton University; Lakehead University; Brock University; Concordia University; Acadia University; McMaster University; University of Northern British Columbia; Université de Montréal; University of Lethbridge; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Université de Moncton; University of Ottawa; McGill University; University of Regina; Université Laval","keywords":"Misconduct; Scientific misconduct; Research integrity; Sanctions; Academic integrity; Context (archaeology); Political science; Corporate governance; Public relations; Criminology; Engineering ethics; Psychology; Business; Law; Engineering; Medicine","score_opus":0.1700990352348766,"score_gpt":0.38865137630327007,"score_spread":0.21855234106839347,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2993344217","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8373378,0.0068022306,0.0034023304,0.039992746,0.00017606614,0.00078688766,0.0013686863,0.00024286169,0.10989044],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98258716,0.002745601,0.0031939535,0.0031836242,0.000032963148,0.00014707563,0.00035153126,0.000037457616,0.007720656],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9157604,0.017395027,0.006954927,0.0033420296,0.039930694,0.01661685],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.64167005,0.099318735,0.04370708,0.016244011,0.16792196,0.03113828],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.08254342,0.00039409252,0.0007807037,0.010899556,0.027856857,0.013180761,0.0037131573,0.0025598237,0.0019852275],"category_scores_gemma":[0.16386189,0.00091834273,0.0006916786,0.016781854,0.009841507,0.0027520864,0.0050371885,0.0030133862,0.0003119525],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006473171,0.00030309384,0.41117275,0.0016148272,0.00025062042,0.0011542906,0.16315532,0.004875791,0.005893533,0.18043415,0.0294472,0.20105115],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008490366,0.00023965324,0.6009381,0.001332199,0.00024121866,0.0004279658,0.10625576,0.002851642,0.007310796,0.01024227,0.26925176,0.00082372286],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96537757,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9697325,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99744016,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.19269894,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.3835868,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9363548},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"qualitative","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":true,"about_ca_topic":true,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"domain":"methods","study_design":"qualitative","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":true,"about_ca_topic":true,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W2996103903","doi":"10.3390/math7121241","title":"Exploring the Link between Academic Dishonesty and Economic Delinquency: A Partial Least Squares Path Modeling Approach","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Mathematics","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Bishop's University","funders":"","keywords":"Cheating; Social psychology; Psychology; Latent variable; Context (archaeology); Outcome (game theory); Path analysis (statistics); Construct (python library); Priming (agriculture); Moderation; Set (abstract data type); Economics; Computer science; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.1433792383947097,"score_gpt":0.30911563328124836,"score_spread":0.16573639488653866,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2996103903","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6629016,0.00039975785,0.33042198,0.0012065369,0.00007064036,0.0004541707,0.0011877832,0.0004652209,0.0028922718],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8702869,0.0005611959,0.124390274,0.00011846491,0.00003633296,0.0008596609,0.0010472169,0.00007269535,0.0026274107],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.997471,0.002011667,0.00006432102,0.00022184754,0.000121393976,0.00010983234],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99319977,0.0056445277,0.0003949012,0.0003033217,0.0003059226,0.00015162044],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003347188,0.0014651086,0.0009596728,0.0016755795,0.0007474871,0.0015181663,0.0015756193,0.00078935054,0.005918176],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008488116,0.0008091284,0.0017131681,0.0019274381,0.0006036694,0.0013168011,0.0017252556,0.0015476658,0.00071617577],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007645094,0.0018142099,0.44591296,0.00075932854,0.003299323,0.0012175743,0.0052870912,0.29799026,0.004177297,0.05571715,0.0039195116,0.17914079],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009585182,0.0010157902,0.05115815,0.00009736164,0.0006261367,0.00026728594,0.0017962281,0.8998584,0.001085441,0.038463842,0.0054251296,0.00011041055],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011826387,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009591258,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99921066,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00070755294,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028822275,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.023515105},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2997440247","doi":"10.1145/792548.611952","title":"Effectiveness of online assessment","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"ACM SIGCSE Bulletin","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Competence (human resources); Online assessment; Online course; Online learning; Multimedia; Medical education; Mathematics education; Psychology; Medicine; Formative assessment","score_opus":0.019544315614180293,"score_gpt":0.3334399466632715,"score_spread":0.3138956310490912,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2997440247","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8801311,0.0043822317,0.021200256,0.0025123328,0.00080868404,0.0013027617,0.0010894213,0.0030106765,0.085562564],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9768832,0.0007102157,0.008752139,0.0005220995,0.00029781612,0.0004300491,0.00057600305,0.00026479625,0.011563693],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9403111,0.035640836,0.0039034097,0.0031408584,0.015510073,0.0014937626],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.64059913,0.27331594,0.022818157,0.024466109,0.030047445,0.008753246],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.030390402,0.0010261358,0.0012024472,0.0032306553,0.0010899957,0.0045974124,0.0015147259,0.001344836,0.011628938],"category_scores_gemma":[0.22345164,0.0002828365,0.0010091584,0.0015187229,0.0006578198,0.005003585,0.0036624903,0.0016014514,0.0038578056],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0037852589,0.005997486,0.06717332,0.0006464285,0.0002745074,0.00011005125,0.0017483189,0.0011086094,0.0020179327,0.00077871274,0.0051882975,0.9111711],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0023762134,0.040829502,0.7220559,0.0025882842,0.0022097256,0.0022958913,0.009391213,0.032101043,0.054658685,0.011526397,0.1193142,0.000652876],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009040315,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010205441,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030390402,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000996942,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014014555,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16072172},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2997690315","doi":"10.11575/cpai.v1i1.43358","title":"Editorial","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"editorial","venue":"University of Calgary","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Scope (computer science); Context (archaeology); Academic integrity; Library science; Research integrity; Political science; Engineering ethics; Media studies; Sociology; Environmental ethics; History; Engineering; Public relations; Computer science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.007087247262283135,"score_gpt":0.23787914858227396,"score_spread":0.23079190131999083,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2997690315","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00004080225,0.0021246723,0.00008081935,0.043411944,0.9470393,0.00002060246,0.00010971711,0.000056426972,0.007115655],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0023204775,0.006151228,0.00022128958,0.04229978,0.8729954,0.000037347138,0.00019788183,0.0001176277,0.07565891],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9891292,0.0009546422,0.0006803421,0.0012505718,0.006977994,0.0010072177],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9438571,0.005475074,0.0013103825,0.0014302144,0.042028133,0.0058991285],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005686314,0.0019987614,0.0015508233,0.0035868746,0.005681299,0.008491673,0.0034813262,0.007954,0.04162295],"category_scores_gemma":[0.048397314,0.00048427586,0.0013076693,0.0015708116,0.0026310422,0.0031443764,0.0016650764,0.011175301,0.018471802],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000071194954,0.0000022464167,0.000020095895,0.000041076793,0.0000018885577,0.000033005625,0.000015026892,0.0000057975617,0.000014029825,0.00040143222,0.99682546,0.0026329092],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000072358907,0.0000035981345,0.00009549068,0.0001608877,0.0000055224696,0.000065123895,0.00005269077,0.000028109705,0.000039658506,0.00032126196,0.9992138,0.0000066059256],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02942302,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06985225,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.992046,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010507449,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018204208,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2999186231","doi":"10.11575/jet.v52i3.69721","title":"Designing and Implementing an Online Academic Integrity Tutorial: Identifying the Challenges within a Post-secondary Context","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Calgary","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Academic integrity; Context (archaeology); Higher education; Academic advising; Research integrity; Medical education; Graduate students; Psychology; Pedagogy; Mathematics education; Computer science; Knowledge management; Engineering ethics; Engineering; Political science; Medicine","score_opus":0.09397843393616583,"score_gpt":0.30176801547878657,"score_spread":0.20778958154262073,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2999186231","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8954548,0.0005212609,0.052878004,0.012185339,0.0004300679,0.0030392355,0.000079544705,0.0011960774,0.034215562],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89060175,0.0006189551,0.09107364,0.0024987129,0.00009967418,0.0011407372,0.00012494768,0.00022946835,0.013612144],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9813137,0.010704922,0.0007441162,0.0011614759,0.0029014878,0.0031743494],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9216973,0.024023686,0.0061042826,0.0046154414,0.020053787,0.02350544],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03400076,0.00046997782,0.0005455553,0.0013227931,0.010376145,0.009322766,0.003370197,0.002707689,0.0045309626],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06552323,0.0005910275,0.00045188362,0.00065264606,0.0034466672,0.0062242975,0.00798419,0.0043365904,0.0020204268],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022914901,0.010232011,0.07923453,0.0013844366,0.000046538244,0.0029975097,0.385467,0.0018341967,0.013410836,0.009173612,0.022066005,0.47392413],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001367675,0.00568651,0.075964615,0.002580675,0.000118050375,0.0029048228,0.55385804,0.007639811,0.02249196,0.0076013654,0.32064572,0.00037168732],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0066908854,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024291188,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99729234,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0056775776,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03132375,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17981541},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2999453864","doi":"10.11575/jet.v52i3.69725","title":"Academic Integrity in the University","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Calgary","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Academic integrity; Higher education; Psychology; Pedagogy; Research integrity; Mathematics education; Political science; Social psychology; Law; Public relations","score_opus":0.03116754540892405,"score_gpt":0.24785480889773479,"score_spread":0.21668726348881073,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2999453864","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10509726,0.017842004,0.00052415306,0.53121626,0.0022245105,0.000060115566,0.00013017262,0.000070256145,0.34283534],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9262167,0.0045103403,0.00029207818,0.0235945,0.0010155803,0.000034233788,0.000047702146,0.00005655545,0.044232275],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9686113,0.015528218,0.0009919862,0.0013878108,0.006189665,0.007291021],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8958939,0.024222998,0.008849215,0.0060472484,0.022822326,0.04216439],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020231843,0.00034619504,0.0013031748,0.0031800414,0.051418237,0.0321162,0.0021942786,0.008861755,0.021359615],"category_scores_gemma":[0.074903056,0.0005181649,0.00045886176,0.0045112637,0.040269386,0.011099369,0.018328909,0.018027449,0.0021512336],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017217363,0.00027314265,0.025925733,0.00027436184,0.000094535295,0.00080520817,0.120963335,0.000346198,0.00028936932,0.5831316,0.19229153,0.07543283],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000059435606,0.00017826832,0.06258634,0.0019414958,0.000065871085,0.00042305124,0.17879039,0.000333771,0.00057850615,0.14318244,0.61171263,0.00014777186],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13620907,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16800876,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9911382,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0398321,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.10088306,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2890035},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3000464218","doi":"10.1139/facets-2019-0031","title":"Perspectives for early-career researchers on plagiarism and scientific integrity","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"FACETS","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Research integrity; Realm; Engineering ethics; Scientific integrity; Transparency (behavior); Academic integrity; Accreditation; Psychology; Scientific misconduct; Political science; Medical education; Medicine; Engineering; Alternative medicine","score_opus":0.18847652458186093,"score_gpt":0.38181963863638313,"score_spread":0.1933431140545222,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3000464218","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00605406,0.024927387,0.004677901,0.9409702,0.0035156887,0.000041940784,0.000024242236,0.000035954276,0.0197526],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.58376855,0.07990923,0.017423935,0.28604904,0.014531943,0.00039350762,0.00009513308,0.00021611745,0.017612536],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9030857,0.07432635,0.0028516154,0.0042543886,0.009734075,0.0057478826],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.5828889,0.32482338,0.016912227,0.013110261,0.034959175,0.02730604],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.122622885,0.0011978073,0.0019113981,0.0048137987,0.018698879,0.038551517,0.004234538,0.021047557,0.007893949],"category_scores_gemma":[0.15642346,0.00067651464,0.0012639886,0.005038214,0.111602545,0.04773314,0.018594146,0.035730872,0.0016492892],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000089146575,0.00010287957,0.0026806789,0.0010286932,0.000034744695,0.0010039172,0.20331545,0.00019206984,0.00050692586,0.71294695,0.044928428,0.03317016],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027295631,0.0000798057,0.0011366995,0.0027360215,0.000022585173,0.00093559385,0.18358754,0.00021859727,0.00040051196,0.58785594,0.22290187,0.00009756017],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004013994,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005496761,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97895247,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013669057,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.028029624,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.64849955},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["research_integrity"],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"domain":"methods","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W3002767658","doi":"10.1080/08989621.2020.1721288","title":"The norms of authorship credit: Challenging the definition of authorship in The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Accountability in Research","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Canadian Medical Association; Dublin City University; European Commission","keywords":"Normative; Code of conduct; Research integrity; Medical journal; Code (set theory); Order (exchange); Scientific misconduct; Engineering ethics; Computer science; Political science; Psychology; Law; Public relations; Library science; Medicine; Alternative medicine; Business","score_opus":0.7205593581249751,"score_gpt":0.5510722679019152,"score_spread":0.16948709022305986,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3002767658","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020528976,0.006930726,0.21235725,0.62796056,0.007099788,0.00027528868,0.0001665302,0.0002321984,0.12444866],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7465207,0.0036255827,0.15644677,0.07662753,0.0054888683,0.0014700731,0.00017638091,0.00039518814,0.009248974],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.4959629,0.36249784,0.03828018,0.016763045,0.077971786,0.008524264],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.32950887,0.49724126,0.029219178,0.055093624,0.078757785,0.010179319],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.32505986,0.0010255533,0.002208662,0.0048941486,0.013550149,0.031032404,0.0056782155,0.025407722,0.0017210124],"category_scores_gemma":[0.52708817,0.0013541592,0.0012530581,0.0061775716,0.11219617,0.030859828,0.014899063,0.026603187,0.000897006],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012213182,0.0000073453275,0.00037853047,0.000043945343,0.0000043828254,0.000038802533,0.0055817007,0.00013088725,0.000033432334,0.98231065,0.0056163124,0.0058417926],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000040545972,0.000034143526,0.0009766311,0.0009857154,0.000014651695,0.00022249324,0.0040219817,0.001643001,0.00028117333,0.91437155,0.07728812,0.000120066856],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015482665,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014755937,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97459227,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.020065365,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.049388606,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.83232135},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"domain":"methods","study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"commentary","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W3003160360","doi":"10.1115/1.4046168","title":"Reviewer's Recognition","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Manu; History; Medicine; Library science; Computer science; Biology; Paleontology","score_opus":0.02973988827170642,"score_gpt":0.2615479704189019,"score_spread":0.23180808214719545,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3003160360","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00009164177,0.0024207195,0.000544931,0.123988956,0.869607,0.00021681441,0.00029216107,0.00036137472,0.0024764289],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.003932576,0.0074952706,0.003141465,0.21649246,0.71052724,0.00151803,0.0007917422,0.0009780632,0.055123094],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9496252,0.0069611347,0.007951595,0.006402617,0.026366692,0.0026927849],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.38812894,0.02381525,0.014641668,0.010265408,0.5448919,0.01825687],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.033388,0.0030290487,0.005377065,0.005365253,0.004411711,0.013635988,0.008635013,0.020177983,0.072107464],"category_scores_gemma":[0.3199494,0.0013778906,0.004121807,0.0034234277,0.0037608517,0.006268744,0.0045442088,0.013812814,0.06517689],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021018142,0.0000046974315,0.00004566206,0.00018971594,0.000008291462,0.00006959811,0.000029415894,0.000011342233,0.000036873917,0.00011585627,0.9939766,0.005490924],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006275113,0.00004320483,0.00039170077,0.001047773,0.000036871585,0.0008287721,0.00019836616,0.00013724707,0.00021738483,0.0007398708,0.99622726,0.00006887211],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022842502,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0056455857,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.966612,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0063664685,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.022110136,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24122351},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3003877329","doi":"10.1145/1227504.1227324","title":"Plagiarism detection using feature-based neural networks","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"ACM SIGCSE Bulletin","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":58,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Plagiarism detection; Feature (linguistics); Relevance (law); Computer science; Detector; Artificial neural network; Similarity (geometry); Artificial intelligence; Code (set theory); Feature engineering; Measure (data warehouse); Pattern recognition (psychology); Natural language processing; Machine learning; Data mining; Deep learning; Programming language; Linguistics","score_opus":0.022764008140186278,"score_gpt":0.2937078578585832,"score_spread":0.27094384971839697,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3003877329","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"reproducibility","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":"reproducibility","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4727884,0.0011416575,0.5075353,0.0006596867,0.00013755537,0.0003818509,0.0009054962,0.010644504,0.0058055194],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8906468,0.00018871359,0.10612107,0.0000710973,0.00006466696,0.00012071854,0.0006403373,0.00006979401,0.0020769062],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986791,0.00029130545,0.00012220863,0.00032693837,0.00046293088,0.00011754359],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99104273,0.0039573144,0.0016236582,0.0005504876,0.0026143473,0.0002114605],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018851775,0.00081424904,0.0008185737,0.004873024,0.00060824864,0.0012781249,0.0010966047,0.000979326,0.0013927607],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009988482,0.00027617396,0.00047917754,0.0018741897,0.00043141248,0.0016703964,0.0007256036,0.000951722,0.0007720705],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005672886,0.00048634672,0.023476992,0.00021090207,0.00017311888,0.00014425363,0.00018253428,0.04343354,0.025759092,0.0008392698,0.0036712668,0.90105546],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029815197,0.00015565121,0.013387056,0.00003288072,0.000055054756,0.00011085438,0.000053161126,0.9621273,0.020835552,0.0021476252,0.001022814,0.000042258023],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0055772644,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006424455,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9990207,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011106938,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006490824,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.011089623},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["research_integrity"],"domain":null,"study_design":"bench_or_experimental","genre":"methods","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium"},{"model":"gpt","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"design_other","genre":"methods","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W3004483728","doi":"10.5430/ijhe.v9n2p248","title":"Maintaining Academic Standards and Integrity in Online Business Courses","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Higher Education","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cheating; Academic integrity; Academic dishonesty; Face (sociological concept); Higher education; Value (mathematics); Public relations; Psychology; Political science; Sociology; Social psychology; Computer science; Law; Social science","score_opus":0.03877962818473165,"score_gpt":0.4076877489188526,"score_spread":0.368908120734121,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3004483728","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8456817,0.00087624585,0.005452796,0.01941519,0.0001721041,0.00008317189,0.000096945296,0.00011267622,0.12810917],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9959843,0.00009506257,0.00052810204,0.0004690832,0.000048845573,0.000010447996,0.000021312326,0.000017476388,0.002825429],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9720703,0.013361791,0.0016190541,0.0013984733,0.008940904,0.0026094276],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.79390454,0.055567842,0.07030727,0.025459025,0.03394736,0.020813968],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01676211,0.00016359506,0.00047631972,0.0021485323,0.006746686,0.011867081,0.0013437017,0.0021051832,0.008179728],"category_scores_gemma":[0.13574988,0.0002513806,0.00028020775,0.0022491908,0.008334285,0.006969001,0.004672417,0.0033207056,0.0019324373],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00040210754,0.0012618303,0.44420397,0.0004168385,0.00010555573,0.00066177256,0.080895215,0.0008837087,0.003075712,0.09216799,0.015233388,0.36069193],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007825539,0.0008951752,0.64180076,0.00088041933,0.000070326256,0.0012945351,0.08471393,0.003285076,0.0058426554,0.16205618,0.09886951,0.00021318466],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036609173,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004631092,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01676211,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034348231,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00821141,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.088647544},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3004819416","doi":"10.1017/iop.2019.121","title":"Supporting robust, rigorous, and reliable reviewing as the cornerstone of our profession: Introducing a competency framework for peer review","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Industrial and Organizational Psychology","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":58,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"Society of Consulting Psychology","keywords":"CLARITY; Technical peer review; Cornerstone; Peer review; Psychology; Quality (philosophy); Publishing; Work (physics); Engineering ethics; Peer feedback; Medical education; Public relations; Knowledge management; Computer science; Political science; Pedagogy; Medicine; Engineering","score_opus":0.11282876640193872,"score_gpt":0.40718610061046706,"score_spread":0.29435733420852833,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3004819416","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.023721335,0.0039101555,0.58574307,0.2967274,0.003495597,0.0030797771,0.00007688021,0.0014030923,0.08184269],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.33987308,0.002131357,0.639068,0.01026056,0.0013353067,0.0016885645,0.000065648106,0.00023801079,0.0053394465],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.7171031,0.19877073,0.019919463,0.008316652,0.048739217,0.007150816],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.46040094,0.27752298,0.038886275,0.0320027,0.14886254,0.042324554],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.26591226,0.0010212609,0.0010827689,0.0067282617,0.012877924,0.0257373,0.004722563,0.008221738,0.0021998063],"category_scores_gemma":[0.30262527,0.0013347542,0.0010854825,0.002151298,0.035972126,0.019441556,0.016261198,0.011472366,0.0020240375],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005962976,0.0005401793,0.007156654,0.0019022374,0.000072162824,0.00077669637,0.060960762,0.0045794044,0.0033284863,0.6309041,0.05420415,0.2355156],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013726781,0.00053967064,0.009018329,0.0074921707,0.00007774582,0.0015199691,0.030040022,0.02219077,0.0057239537,0.54554635,0.3769582,0.00075560913],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011711412,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016209958,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7340877,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0153951645,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.103866674,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.90526086},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3008129851","doi":"10.11575/prism/37408","title":"Significant Incidents of Academic Misconduct in Canada 2010-2019 - Timeline Infographic","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PRISM (University of Calgary)","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Infographic; Timeline; Misconduct; Political science; Public relations; Computer science; History; Law; Data mining","score_opus":0.020654255190904646,"score_gpt":0.22481825248844553,"score_spread":0.2041639972975409,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3008129851","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1259102,0.00963627,0.001298541,0.043189924,0.004686798,0.0013011666,0.33598486,0.0022367055,0.4757555],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4951093,0.024981638,0.0025577492,0.010861194,0.00096928154,0.0007148169,0.11572094,0.0006662378,0.3484189],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9935249,0.00020426398,0.00029628232,0.00022987228,0.0044116857,0.0013329863],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9699119,0.00207996,0.0037668382,0.00064194185,0.019841388,0.003757947],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014657262,0.0005702918,0.00037220083,0.0100692,0.012745835,0.004170767,0.0017052313,0.0014698404,0.028193858],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013334417,0.0004835982,0.0004979733,0.014359587,0.0011462366,0.0014560146,0.00335577,0.0025933045,0.005960846],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007558565,0.000048601774,0.028228419,0.00062794413,0.00002620284,0.0008468305,0.00554606,0.00016645751,0.00023519603,0.0023855786,0.9194798,0.04233337],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001655707,0.000047136127,0.28277382,0.0013608218,0.00004198015,0.0008313017,0.033046078,0.00030444472,0.0009067353,0.00039573462,0.6801457,0.00012977865],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98239934,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99132854,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99853426,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03902809,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08745578,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28316998},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3009305714","doi":"","title":"Du plagiat à l’intégrité académique : quelles compétences, quelles stratégies? : introduction au numéro thématique","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec en Outaouais","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Sociology","score_opus":0.01027576638157673,"score_gpt":0.25232966650446087,"score_spread":0.24205390012288414,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3009305714","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.029949283,0.17937554,0.040194612,0.34554505,0.0052004857,0.00008091062,0.00025973257,0.00020263228,0.3991917],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7902351,0.09947323,0.015118225,0.015446595,0.012640951,0.00027295155,0.00022640234,0.00025813482,0.06632836],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98150164,0.00971421,0.0012725216,0.0015447586,0.0048533413,0.0011135617],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94875574,0.037591778,0.004568754,0.002016389,0.0053019705,0.001765382],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011491243,0.00067928946,0.0010990603,0.008754384,0.0068838457,0.020575482,0.0020611186,0.0074484325,0.008749804],"category_scores_gemma":[0.047925808,0.0004176899,0.00070368435,0.008889633,0.028668385,0.018597217,0.006873263,0.0075636636,0.0014897465],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030152478,0.000043663815,0.0030899984,0.00072153495,0.000022147675,0.00010291138,0.013870948,0.00034697828,0.00020106437,0.89642435,0.015626715,0.06951962],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017426108,0.00005266561,0.012116532,0.0031014099,0.000029871793,0.001001353,0.015547278,0.0012025799,0.00059077895,0.44197786,0.52425843,0.000103810475],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018557843,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015197773,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99255157,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013365399,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011033569,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09697324},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3009728404","doi":"","title":"From plagiarism to academic integrity: Which skills, which strategies? Introduction to special issue: Introduction to special issue","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec en Outaouais","funders":"","keywords":"Academic integrity; Engineering ethics; Academic dishonesty; Mathematics education; Cheating; Psychology; Engineering; Social psychology","score_opus":0.011414161001601508,"score_gpt":0.2996456282031324,"score_spread":0.28823146720153087,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3009728404","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00042563662,0.03342544,0.0016035311,0.26111645,0.6748862,0.00016139697,0.00085546076,0.00032761885,0.02719834],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0044115055,0.030891426,0.0014431473,0.08320444,0.8151047,0.00020826953,0.0010511407,0.0003548888,0.06333033],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99675,0.0006825425,0.00054552703,0.0004225734,0.0012605838,0.00033884644],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9721739,0.007862999,0.0022370159,0.0008120635,0.013036657,0.0038772172],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037082375,0.0018859673,0.0019765133,0.004508556,0.0029664258,0.0092463475,0.0021442468,0.01035049,0.08954799],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028496979,0.0006665038,0.0015748454,0.001938861,0.0021347175,0.008464051,0.0042476533,0.013075873,0.037440397],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001031309,0.000019386936,0.00011116097,0.00017361317,0.0000033403242,0.00004082136,0.000028814804,0.000010580649,0.000055237408,0.0007072044,0.98541427,0.013425425],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000211286,0.00006628368,0.003111398,0.0015128283,0.000023434426,0.0005692204,0.00028636176,0.00009313924,0.0001253493,0.0063037667,0.9878428,0.000044150078],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002752466,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0058366843,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99629176,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003184979,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004567258,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29956788},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["research_integrity"],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"editorial","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["research_integrity"],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"editorial","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W3010374676","doi":"10.11575/prism/37443","title":"An Inquiry into Major Academic Integrity Violations in Canada: 2010-2019","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PRISM (University of Calgary)","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Academic integrity; Political science; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.028834391551381334,"score_gpt":0.25887898812066423,"score_spread":0.2300445965692829,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3010374676","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8759823,0.004807958,0.00046816832,0.058765262,0.00046719378,0.0002846786,0.003044996,0.000069455935,0.05610999],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9759748,0.0037255755,0.00032382176,0.005931744,0.00010643878,0.00009332997,0.0005617934,0.000038820548,0.013243598],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99066436,0.00109466,0.00035320994,0.0005520666,0.004996266,0.002339396],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94801754,0.013706887,0.008787743,0.00091382203,0.0216286,0.006945415],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007277517,0.00041837269,0.00052231865,0.0058075325,0.037088424,0.011767452,0.0030043372,0.003595418,0.0034019188],"category_scores_gemma":[0.034179278,0.0006092861,0.00033233486,0.012466965,0.009565582,0.0033476,0.005994704,0.0060989554,0.00040714908],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006699838,0.00006467711,0.04490196,0.00044530333,0.000017080327,0.003117942,0.8856364,0.00012770662,0.00063177507,0.006335822,0.036138784,0.022515632],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003324639,0.000020861675,0.0458152,0.00036712099,0.000014951954,0.00040073443,0.85432684,0.00012734227,0.00040105978,0.0002575863,0.09821617,0.00004877151],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9861334,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.993153,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9964046,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.15583701,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.21986288,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9791094},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3013088182","doi":"10.18438/eblip29651","title":"Differences in Faculty Approaches to Plagiarism Deterrence are an Opportunity for Increased Collaboration in Information Literacy Instruction","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Evidence Based Library and Information Practice","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Information literacy; Psychology; Medical education; Plagiarism detection; Mathematics education; Pedagogy; Medicine; Computer science","score_opus":0.1138349922084648,"score_gpt":0.3251594065070142,"score_spread":0.2113244142985494,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3013088182","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7651329,0.020063965,0.020275258,0.0567059,0.0009896631,0.00045157198,0.0002239301,0.00053311896,0.13562372],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97975713,0.002915898,0.0075375796,0.004047175,0.00022930469,0.00026217752,0.00010858022,0.00010577253,0.0050363634],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.92920655,0.045656856,0.0038456235,0.004456853,0.013482193,0.0033519703],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8322605,0.101644136,0.027206458,0.010914003,0.015482144,0.012492778],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.033163827,0.00021593335,0.00044711062,0.0031694514,0.0061849947,0.010134203,0.0018825424,0.0016562004,0.0076947804],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1334655,0.00036789334,0.00058118,0.004323397,0.004453979,0.009435229,0.010416868,0.0022823643,0.0013737987],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001710968,0.0008233114,0.12393749,0.0024454775,0.00016033772,0.0003887909,0.16212957,0.0003130157,0.0025879887,0.017989494,0.011573927,0.6774795],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016296298,0.0013217701,0.4166259,0.004704187,0.00019163708,0.0010909343,0.2405929,0.00041509888,0.0043446766,0.037336554,0.2929678,0.00024561016],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020956465,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006219076,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9983438,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0062861596,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014133061,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17538917},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["research_integrity"],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["research_integrity"],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"commentary","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W3013202718","doi":"10.1007/s10805-020-09363-4","title":"The Paradox of Faculty Attitudes toward Student Violations of Academic Integrity","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Academic Ethics","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":73,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary; Assiniboine Community College","funders":"","keywords":"Academic dishonesty; Academic integrity; Context (archaeology); Psychology; Medical education; Dishonesty; Cheating; Political science; Public relations; Medicine; Social psychology","score_opus":0.23761507115590438,"score_gpt":0.47799976303864966,"score_spread":0.24038469188274528,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3013202718","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9549916,0.00021794898,0.00033692486,0.02858002,0.00005225849,0.0000070135325,0.0000352421,0.0000134768325,0.015765551],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988446,0.000047704056,0.000023373039,0.0008571317,0.00002495723,0.000001609622,0.0000055124747,0.0000036194847,0.00019133446],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.988808,0.0060561686,0.0004987746,0.00060494314,0.0029820336,0.0010501053],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.78866535,0.12526287,0.051688075,0.006701327,0.013346406,0.014335948],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013961862,0.00011850671,0.00042776598,0.0018577813,0.0031714465,0.0058086175,0.0010840064,0.0029599231,0.007072889],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11298614,0.000278483,0.00031908066,0.0025050414,0.0076473868,0.003635311,0.0031877537,0.0057966867,0.000564307],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001270792,0.0013995306,0.7457081,0.00025574904,0.00024863618,0.0009097978,0.06461955,0.000882906,0.0022704215,0.104170784,0.015055119,0.06320858],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019300946,0.00033714363,0.7892704,0.00024119421,0.000111276924,0.0007296567,0.10935614,0.002019243,0.0016556733,0.08422704,0.011747235,0.00011203935],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0039582714,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005546142,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9970401,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028716705,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0042211283,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07383829},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3016958967","doi":"10.1186/s12916-020-01550-9","title":"Stress testing journals: a quasi-experimental study of rejection rates of a previously published paper","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"BMC Medicine","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo; University of Toronto; McGill University; Ottawa Hospital; University of Ottawa","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research; University of Ottawa","keywords":"Medicine; Stress testing (software)","score_opus":0.12014900660892891,"score_gpt":0.38819292012636825,"score_spread":0.26804391351743934,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3016958967","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99768865,0.000036662503,0.00060462905,0.000095212265,0.000060405153,0.0008790102,0.00003526212,0.000013059944,0.0005872241],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99336714,0.000048611964,0.002147047,0.00036641065,0.0001252029,0.0032163379,0.000050791845,0.000012572043,0.00066589407],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"nonrandomized_trial","domain_scores_codex":[0.9362291,0.044824533,0.0052387724,0.004129286,0.007790109,0.0017882527],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.60915756,0.2742192,0.08142737,0.015978763,0.011623521,0.0075936415],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.058472518,0.00054697285,0.0010645417,0.0012286566,0.0021895398,0.0032325275,0.0014931031,0.0019153603,0.0059438436],"category_scores_gemma":[0.17577429,0.0009399555,0.00090848317,0.00070081535,0.0038300066,0.0024605773,0.0015319634,0.0016152405,0.001203979],"study_design_candidate":"nonrandomized_trial","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.036916055,0.11100137,0.5874786,0.002763603,0.0009068226,0.0012542612,0.15103129,0.00082729943,0.028255224,0.0028634036,0.0029256407,0.07377651],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0065631513,0.19670378,0.72489613,0.0005446879,0.00036041383,0.00070583605,0.04618915,0.004938235,0.009135748,0.0025683977,0.0069836406,0.00041078654],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00049523043,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00042948616,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99808466,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012142754,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002191346,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30923593},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3022237381","doi":"10.1007/s10805-020-09367-0","title":"An Institutional Self-Study of Text-Matching Software in a Canadian Graduate-Level Engineering Program","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Academic Ethics","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"University of Calgary","keywords":"Academic integrity; Similarity (geometry); Plagiarism detection; Matching (statistics); Psychology; Institutional review board; Set (abstract data type); Misconduct; License; Rubric; Medical education; Graduate students; Psychological intervention; Empirical research; Computer science; Mathematics education; Pedagogy; Medicine; Artificial intelligence; Political science; Social psychology; Image (mathematics); Mathematics; Statistics","score_opus":0.1450758898708603,"score_gpt":0.39120960639397556,"score_spread":0.24613371652311528,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3022237381","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9988538,0.0000127322855,0.00015594992,0.00012896919,0.0000050786425,0.00008221683,0.000014851194,0.000009914695,0.00073652214],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997113,0.000031379197,0.0006173968,0.00016599403,0.0000059547165,0.00006249157,0.0000318131,0.000009938956,0.0019619565],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99071455,0.0033008903,0.0003495704,0.0008908525,0.0030615334,0.0016825873],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93931246,0.013705521,0.008246193,0.0032018896,0.022048274,0.013485692],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01264985,0.0003815859,0.0005475299,0.0030895008,0.013218405,0.0033584358,0.002249802,0.0009358445,0.0021487877],"category_scores_gemma":[0.043706875,0.00049595366,0.00037835955,0.0020616367,0.0053524557,0.0009491538,0.002572338,0.0019568913,0.00036234577],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00043718572,0.011977883,0.3872156,0.00012751027,0.00003783826,0.00093196344,0.5144655,0.00030872694,0.0029339478,0.0015775773,0.0032108815,0.07677536],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000095108626,0.005314724,0.4370513,0.00012301118,0.000042549487,0.000409671,0.5320696,0.002319902,0.0037993633,0.0004066698,0.01820971,0.0001583182],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.427201,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.62694275,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99906415,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.022386868,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.046740633,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.84942883},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3025725364","doi":"10.33422/9th-hps.2019.04.256","title":"Implementing a University-Wide Academic Integrity Online Tutorial","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"MacEwan University","funders":"","keywords":"Academic integrity; Computer science; Research integrity; Software engineering; Engineering ethics; Engineering; Library science","score_opus":0.027457700308785988,"score_gpt":0.31965127784305775,"score_spread":0.2921935775342718,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3025725364","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9173867,0.00019126397,0.02087123,0.0048425333,0.00048618688,0.009415896,0.00033885555,0.0030987747,0.04336839],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8984141,0.0002543721,0.06796738,0.0014670526,0.00010507008,0.003723362,0.0004788085,0.0002316279,0.027358262],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9882399,0.0057315817,0.00048417842,0.000876264,0.0022640284,0.0024040372],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9249831,0.016909791,0.0033452215,0.0074070403,0.027717486,0.019637328],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.029248437,0.0004560911,0.0004705386,0.0012960902,0.0068934173,0.0040046386,0.0032763176,0.0017793492,0.007305976],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06191808,0.00046001398,0.0005615138,0.0008868732,0.0015964091,0.0029953243,0.00466377,0.002911335,0.0018655866],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007694633,0.029157441,0.050501414,0.0010877427,0.00006262946,0.002021373,0.08933443,0.0033698694,0.02233347,0.006676167,0.05023093,0.7444551],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006246932,0.032405317,0.2140167,0.0012439322,0.00020668292,0.0012555844,0.20769757,0.010938956,0.058382567,0.0031556915,0.46916965,0.0009026226],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.032959767,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09768541,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9982206,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007635746,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.042999454,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15468234},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3033253180","doi":"10.1080/2194587x.2020.1741394","title":"Honor and Shame: Plagiarism and Governing Student Morality","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of College and Character","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Mount Royal University","funders":"","keywords":"Honor; Honesty; Morality; Shame; Punitive damages; Sociology; Moral development; Social psychology; Psychology; Pedagogy; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.023336306675625796,"score_gpt":0.29463530279063177,"score_spread":0.27129899611500596,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3033253180","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.69790137,0.0032840862,0.016686868,0.053316865,0.00031512647,0.00009782368,0.00003595161,0.00009782097,0.2282641],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964097,0.00021530125,0.00041344616,0.0005207367,0.00006560589,0.000015522784,0.000002842231,0.000010372137,0.0023464605],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.968384,0.020971771,0.0014570509,0.001706055,0.005251903,0.0022291145],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.910486,0.048496164,0.021517312,0.0071765766,0.0072466936,0.005077306],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021353502,0.00029583328,0.0004477877,0.0024967801,0.011088635,0.015158986,0.0018937916,0.0043448713,0.0048999945],"category_scores_gemma":[0.089261025,0.00037771696,0.00037316204,0.001972577,0.043183602,0.009679984,0.011439086,0.007578747,0.0004941113],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017724262,0.0002986647,0.050378025,0.000334081,0.00004737962,0.0006211335,0.2815113,0.0007767686,0.0012413254,0.5811355,0.004534476,0.0789441],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007972149,0.00036636248,0.092380606,0.001643715,0.000081294784,0.0013601526,0.23638819,0.00291063,0.005140802,0.54408187,0.11532784,0.00023875813],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003802608,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0048959507,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9956551,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008822202,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008221307,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11292946},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["research_integrity"],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"other","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W3040175923","doi":"10.22230/cjc.2020v45n2a3667","title":"Public Deception as Ideological and Institutional Critique: On the Limits and Possibilities of Academic Hoaxing","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Communication","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Mount Saint Vincent University","funders":"","keywords":"Hoax; Deception; Ideology; Sociology; Covert; Academic integrity; Public relations; Media studies; Social psychology; Psychology; Political science; Politics; Law","score_opus":0.13733969536462487,"score_gpt":0.3362047496004834,"score_spread":0.19886505423585854,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3040175923","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15869091,0.0140982885,0.04864406,0.2714256,0.0009976631,0.00012941299,0.00006511099,0.00017717003,0.5057718],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.990867,0.0013029991,0.0017597845,0.003034235,0.00022933824,0.000053524058,0.0000075997723,0.000045365447,0.0027000122],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9291205,0.05386653,0.0014674101,0.0027017305,0.008802659,0.0040411116],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8545103,0.111515775,0.009082699,0.013253726,0.008570746,0.003066664],"candidate_categories":["sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.057145473,0.0005976651,0.0010322547,0.0052042576,0.02240373,0.03430207,0.0033734576,0.010830534,0.004588777],"category_scores_gemma":[0.077060685,0.0005426787,0.0006242144,0.0033050603,0.19526933,0.02714917,0.017180588,0.015281966,0.0006135426],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001550338,0.000011241299,0.00044333754,0.000050654762,0.0000034628329,0.0001546992,0.10256788,0.0001245358,0.00007254174,0.8903001,0.0011043624,0.00515159],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002705029,0.000041024527,0.0010045889,0.0011886032,0.000020873342,0.00046510852,0.19411792,0.0007940024,0.0007198975,0.6705383,0.13101545,0.00006718773],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011474335,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010234241,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9891695,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.020655632,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01892036,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30221778},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3045492774","doi":"10.3138/jsp.51.4.10","title":"Associated Self-Citations and Propagation Luck Two Problems with Citation Counts","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Luck; Skew; Measure (data warehouse); Computer science; Publication; Discounting; Actuarial science; Epistemology; Economics; Advertising; Library science; Data mining; Business; Philosophy; Finance","score_opus":0.037012890942189326,"score_gpt":0.27689491803968375,"score_spread":0.23988202709749443,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3045492774","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17723404,0.02653464,0.6055595,0.034728967,0.0030630028,0.0007472361,0.0021716142,0.0013664209,0.14859456],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8556365,0.0051764525,0.11218718,0.0022961048,0.0044115726,0.0007538498,0.0008042713,0.0006393272,0.018094733],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9360095,0.024942152,0.0062211105,0.006115081,0.025159746,0.0015524812],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6273048,0.2686775,0.04387528,0.032735825,0.024943156,0.0024635743],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.045754064,0.001442054,0.0029951206,0.011996838,0.0034001637,0.012788574,0.0040486194,0.0037820747,0.005894415],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2572878,0.0010763699,0.0017875205,0.026738422,0.0139494855,0.027108876,0.0068601714,0.0065082177,0.0019273831],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027409726,0.00014892769,0.04494439,0.0008410424,0.00057865,0.00025942034,0.0041192654,0.007813526,0.00063929084,0.7615005,0.0107057765,0.16817509],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000060389204,0.00012615921,0.024557712,0.0004496999,0.00019915758,0.0008027482,0.00068546657,0.014719185,0.0016192525,0.9317085,0.024898987,0.00017269612],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021560674,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022058655,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98800313,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004416445,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020540955,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24197352},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3048157973","doi":"","title":"Doc Zone : Faking the grade","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cheating; Test (biology); Psychology; Work (physics); White (mutation); Social psychology; Engineering","score_opus":0.046045104016715604,"score_gpt":0.3353301198438955,"score_spread":0.2892850158271799,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3048157973","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10797881,0.0013674417,0.007574314,0.015081555,0.010314027,0.00084639597,0.03851202,0.019507268,0.7988182],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.37728506,0.0011304392,0.00851933,0.0046473835,0.002609364,0.0004561428,0.016084716,0.00294176,0.5863258],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996306,0.000085481224,0.000016207065,0.000035927675,0.00013843871,0.000093374336],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971384,0.0007453793,0.00025984074,0.0006306334,0.00075172744,0.000474088],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004400396,0.00071239745,0.00027094813,0.0011625981,0.0013741978,0.0015673052,0.00045478888,0.0010214696,0.20716105],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0073940917,0.00017734036,0.00025302582,0.00049029576,0.00035336698,0.0020461173,0.001326501,0.0008012871,0.07123988],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003115018,0.00007206967,0.004125573,0.00015902596,0.000009980756,0.00046749267,0.0011872549,0.00006556263,0.001215298,0.0018673494,0.9040822,0.086436674],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000050083265,0.0002579289,0.029282978,0.00031613957,0.000022453416,0.0010970057,0.003152235,0.0009675365,0.0039202576,0.0013474703,0.9595208,0.00006518685],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0045344606,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0075801606,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99897856,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00044441933,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00036611196,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6930227},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W305629077","doi":"","title":"Dialyzing the Academic Misconduct from the Academic Exchange System/DIALYSER D'INCONDUITE DE L'ACADEMIQUE DU SYSTEME D'ECHANGE UNIVERSITAIRES","year":2012,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Cross-cultural communication","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Boycott; Misconduct; Humanities; Political science; Phenomenon; Sociology; Law; Philosophy; Politics","score_opus":0.06608426732962024,"score_gpt":0.3477302088430619,"score_spread":0.28164594151344163,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W305629077","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9896472,0.00010884186,0.0017083553,0.00056123734,0.00001992137,0.00004075673,0.00039027128,0.000050974926,0.0074724783],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998041,0.00003336021,0.00048169008,0.00003164759,0.00000788287,0.000023537674,0.00012620955,0.0000075178637,0.0012473095],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9904441,0.004531628,0.0010861333,0.0008743818,0.002497778,0.0005659546],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8919338,0.06077223,0.019913388,0.0071245525,0.018414704,0.0018412482],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0109316455,0.00013987714,0.00030365124,0.0035715357,0.0018046502,0.00451569,0.00068148534,0.00065651204,0.007717898],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07331015,0.00016041024,0.00028754983,0.005038107,0.0014450661,0.0027805204,0.0028578057,0.0010655877,0.0006803663],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00049144187,0.00014853984,0.87786084,0.00022677459,0.0001359499,0.00041562837,0.03336212,0.0016358125,0.0016551745,0.0281938,0.0018254567,0.054048408],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000031856634,0.0002557616,0.9040301,0.00016757155,0.00012217322,0.00039574658,0.0504748,0.01132427,0.0057041827,0.010133938,0.017278891,0.00008079541],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008990343,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0051264204,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9993435,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037826067,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025076047,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05781275},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3086003063","doi":"10.1007/978-3-030-48415-6","title":"Research Ethics for Students in the Social Sciences","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":90,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Simon Fraser University; Universiteit Utrecht; Universiteit Leiden; University of Cambridge; University of Virginia; U.S. Department of Education","keywords":"Sociology; Engineering ethics; Social science; Psychology; Engineering","score_opus":0.4901642510809425,"score_gpt":0.6016699411340541,"score_spread":0.11150569005311162,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3086003063","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0018126604,0.032368682,0.033960104,0.39515108,0.012588634,0.00050068606,0.0001489906,0.0004943279,0.52297485],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.06895491,0.037804015,0.05310074,0.23526624,0.019438768,0.0029032594,0.00032668974,0.0009325973,0.5812728],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9763066,0.017352778,0.00063202635,0.0007935328,0.0042120405,0.000703065],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9653265,0.023847876,0.0012519377,0.0029830246,0.0048399735,0.0017507786],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02517075,0.00085460366,0.0010374107,0.0008869725,0.0062581184,0.011158121,0.0007620063,0.0070254705,0.0114482995],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03887096,0.0007809767,0.00044305227,0.0014688392,0.017927056,0.008964168,0.004907652,0.02284335,0.014407719],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010795167,0.000041719162,0.00013433145,0.0001744089,0.000006390749,0.00008263767,0.010298599,0.00008914987,0.00015832807,0.6089917,0.3432372,0.036774762],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007132869,0.000016890659,0.00017249401,0.00041902758,0.0000017567451,0.00016756667,0.0017211157,0.00011470652,0.00005632658,0.18977727,0.8075363,0.000009424524],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001213188,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016974225,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9929745,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003472571,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01155615,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13311726},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3086944483","doi":"10.4018/978-1-7998-5030-4.ch013","title":"Plagiarism and Information Literacy Workshops for International Students","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Advances in higher education and professional development book series","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Windsor; Variety (cybernetics); Information literacy; Mathematics education; Medical education; Literacy; Graduate students; Pedagogy; Psychology; Computer science; Medicine","score_opus":0.01770325178153723,"score_gpt":0.35209684388996576,"score_spread":0.3343935921084285,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3086944483","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.44149312,0.018183876,0.0056540426,0.015612328,0.0016980796,0.00076592556,0.00024717484,0.0010254388,0.51532006],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5651332,0.020371417,0.013367703,0.0022958734,0.0007546028,0.000525481,0.0004880464,0.00023360537,0.39683008],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999204,0.00032226436,0.000041534884,0.00005614532,0.00022764785,0.0001484202],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99750096,0.0009916887,0.00028474422,0.00014151381,0.00025855834,0.00082255766],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016894186,0.000505914,0.00023433728,0.00085793703,0.0031332744,0.0026021765,0.0010568751,0.0008699934,0.023564769],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0036677087,0.00017441256,0.00027261063,0.0008730511,0.00066160096,0.0019011444,0.003925709,0.001396042,0.004107073],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013183613,0.0021648256,0.0075348346,0.0012716507,0.000009861962,0.0012187774,0.08849256,0.00021157556,0.006840879,0.0043934966,0.17417227,0.7135574],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000036224166,0.0011760512,0.035059523,0.0016368657,0.000019021738,0.00315896,0.08268823,0.00032654728,0.0057612886,0.0030880042,0.8670076,0.000041727653],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011988853,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007479423,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99913,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009652628,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027490219,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07883197},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"other","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["research_integrity"],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"commentary","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W3092685673","doi":"10.1080/02602938.2020.1826900","title":"When academic integrity rules should not apply: a survey of academic staff","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Centre for Social Innovation","funders":"","keywords":"Academic integrity; Ambiguity; Public relations; Compliance (psychology); Ideology; Psychology; Multinational corporation; Welfare; Social psychology; Action (physics); Political science; Law","score_opus":0.29559258214728357,"score_gpt":0.4864898433562915,"score_spread":0.1908972612090079,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3092685673","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99806875,0.00013410003,0.00017191694,0.0007042134,0.000009681451,0.000012161016,0.000024357883,0.0000034728637,0.0008714043],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994155,0.00012295843,0.00012539612,0.00019379197,0.0000073788847,0.000010810168,0.000013602426,0.0000021321835,0.0001084343],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9778085,0.011658942,0.0030257308,0.0007508805,0.004184206,0.0025718282],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9113723,0.028118886,0.0423546,0.002798359,0.009880358,0.005475562],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02192045,0.00013448462,0.0003883759,0.0017590984,0.0026949418,0.0028205966,0.000784192,0.0012463115,0.0013807577],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07865191,0.0003726093,0.00022571851,0.002171869,0.002415743,0.0024669594,0.0021789053,0.0012085888,0.00045030293],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000105890016,0.00010932595,0.8922543,0.0001164367,0.000019943694,0.00043369134,0.08586438,0.000054121763,0.0005364362,0.00042722805,0.0010440988,0.019034155],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008829489,0.00032307697,0.482633,0.00025875765,0.000020001478,0.0009777714,0.5081089,0.00029843938,0.0005603677,0.000579363,0.006179746,0.000051806215],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0071388744,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0082339905,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99875367,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019030119,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0041104467,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.115927815},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3094744592","doi":"10.5206/cjsotl-rcacea.2020.2.8508","title":"Examining Academic Integrity Using Course-Level Learning Outcomes","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Academic integrity; Academic dishonesty; Learning development; Academic achievement; Higher education; Mathematics education; Data integrity; Audit; Psychology; Medical education; Computer science; Political science; Medicine; Management; Computer security; Social psychology","score_opus":0.2472324269926388,"score_gpt":0.39010598128272966,"score_spread":0.14287355429009085,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3094744592","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.892497,0.020621534,0.020940557,0.0050810957,0.0004358321,0.00073067955,0.0057494105,0.0005677539,0.053376142],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98137134,0.0044484367,0.007570965,0.000426605,0.00009285013,0.00027557695,0.002645203,0.00006557303,0.0031034579],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98765314,0.0028318248,0.0012524548,0.0009978518,0.0067439303,0.0005207935],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9073692,0.028144915,0.02348953,0.0031390868,0.034969952,0.0028874062],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015063273,0.00035814955,0.0007929901,0.010518793,0.0010693122,0.0032072787,0.0013978599,0.00046716523,0.002940592],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08532079,0.00013229682,0.00081186707,0.008422076,0.0007656545,0.0030024126,0.0027210969,0.0012993935,0.0007195474],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012436286,0.00060361234,0.4778293,0.00200926,0.000618352,0.0000754209,0.0021143572,0.0011402513,0.0006947049,0.0021453425,0.005997401,0.5066477],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027108501,0.0009733556,0.9550689,0.0026011607,0.00045711495,0.00019300224,0.0028033403,0.0013093761,0.004418788,0.001702823,0.030352043,0.00009301195],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007754176,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015879238,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9995328,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003625645,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006752421,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07966316},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3095477655","doi":"10.7202/1071514ar","title":"Étude sur la propension à tricher aux examens à l’université : élaboration et processus de validation du Questionnaire sur la tricherie aux examens à l’université (QTEU)","year":2020,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Mesure et évaluation en éducation","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université TÉLUQ; Université du Québec en Outaouais; Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Psychology; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.05456236079530939,"score_gpt":0.321184239938284,"score_spread":0.2666218791429746,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3095477655","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95810753,0.0010480916,0.024049403,0.002109602,0.00021182111,0.0023944897,0.00057369046,0.000116522,0.011388744],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9548546,0.0013263131,0.032204542,0.0008130381,0.0000691053,0.004858196,0.0005048382,0.00009452126,0.0052748392],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9546898,0.027107114,0.0053897803,0.0016705312,0.009511576,0.0016311387],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.83853513,0.09134766,0.0138633065,0.008968987,0.044439286,0.0028456445],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.074219115,0.0004853661,0.00084803515,0.0036527226,0.0023599458,0.0034884748,0.0013170732,0.001002626,0.0036389711],"category_scores_gemma":[0.14468935,0.00064657076,0.0013543338,0.0024441446,0.003047377,0.003170991,0.004591346,0.0026100508,0.0011107541],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00037274766,0.00075004116,0.39426836,0.0026976631,0.00028476605,0.00061713473,0.33876193,0.0005330981,0.0073723528,0.008533549,0.004791093,0.24101728],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000079945625,0.0013239847,0.704774,0.0029296095,0.00022875915,0.00095182547,0.20338254,0.0022396462,0.011471844,0.0045467466,0.06779636,0.00027462118],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00921202,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011008949,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9989974,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003789266,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009746265,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.39251292},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3099942884","doi":"10.11575/cpai.v3i1.69811","title":"Applying a Holistic Approach to Contract Cheating: A Canadian Response","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SOURCE Sheridan's Institutional Repository (Sheridan College)","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Cheating; Action plan; Action (physics); Perspective (graphical); Plan (archaeology); Academic integrity; Public relations; Political science; Business; Engineering ethics; Management; Computer science; Engineering; Psychology; Economics; Social psychology; Geography; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.035796095048858056,"score_gpt":0.2717247166329194,"score_spread":0.23592862158406136,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3099942884","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09349209,0.004229409,0.016461296,0.5262491,0.0021364337,0.000889772,0.00020630132,0.0002274353,0.3561081],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8575246,0.005479083,0.01937279,0.053092044,0.00020096102,0.0003841311,0.00014732251,0.00015019753,0.06364893],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.95941985,0.012631284,0.0010196936,0.0026040587,0.015386074,0.008938942],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9681985,0.0069892444,0.001058845,0.0017038137,0.014770676,0.0072789392],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03224175,0.00079094456,0.0005514664,0.0037369125,0.05674069,0.014982462,0.0037984666,0.008142866,0.0056827753],"category_scores_gemma":[0.035098106,0.0006679011,0.00075567415,0.0049479413,0.0320849,0.0057831053,0.018811202,0.013100812,0.0004368567],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005647988,0.00014392509,0.008058605,0.00038891067,0.000040840965,0.0019821057,0.30688375,0.00174188,0.0017534652,0.4011002,0.15622565,0.12162423],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003396406,0.00008047673,0.008404227,0.00051907415,0.000026848242,0.0004060795,0.2633896,0.0012664119,0.0006736789,0.03326369,0.6917611,0.00017497322],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9580156,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97877,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9918571,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.19212127,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.46343064,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.93702483},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3109694751","doi":"10.1007/s40979-020-00062-6","title":"Exam cheating among Quebec’s preservice teachers: the influencing factors","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal for Educational Integrity","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université TÉLUQ; Bibliothèque et Archives nationales du Québec; Université Laval; Université du Québec en Outaouais","funders":"","keywords":"Cheating; Likert scale; Psychology; Context (archaeology); Scale (ratio); Multilevel model; Descriptive statistics; Survey research; Phenomenon; Mathematics education; Social psychology; Applied psychology; Mathematics; Statistics; Developmental psychology; Geography","score_opus":0.07375159827665845,"score_gpt":0.3921008257779774,"score_spread":0.31834922750131894,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3109694751","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99645066,0.00021834351,0.000073450174,0.00046455977,0.000007670081,0.000024307727,0.00014846175,0.0000044648905,0.002608034],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990625,0.000076676115,0.000053231815,0.00005174133,0.000004120367,0.0000066670973,0.00005579306,0.0000014343137,0.00068785733],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99800867,0.0006045868,0.00008926369,0.00019377828,0.0006459008,0.00045789458],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98148626,0.0046665133,0.004745469,0.0005086852,0.0058847987,0.00270827],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022579117,0.0001800455,0.00028974732,0.0014635922,0.0033295408,0.0022172946,0.0007974458,0.00049378665,0.0037765184],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008421328,0.00014069983,0.00022306814,0.0015910919,0.0012514885,0.00043460814,0.0007625449,0.0008263474,0.0001868563],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024837109,0.000070256094,0.9876851,0.000023449775,0.000015525273,0.00012933872,0.004331867,0.000046046345,0.00022431002,0.00010593907,0.0006197141,0.0067236973],"study_design_scores_gemma":[8.7293233e-7,0.00001624187,0.9934249,0.000018719109,0.000004807671,0.000020264228,0.0055430555,0.00008718783,0.00006123645,0.000009184045,0.0008093001,0.000004221936],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.869576,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9438579,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99950624,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012161981,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011837739,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26238418},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3110458959","doi":"10.7202/1074896ar","title":"Tourisme et Covid-19","year":2020,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Téoros Revue de recherche en tourisme","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières; Université du Québec à Montréal; Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); 2019-20 coronavirus outbreak; Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2); Virology; Geography; Medicine; Internal medicine; Outbreak; Infectious disease (medical specialty); Disease","score_opus":0.348625440054013,"score_gpt":0.45608323825504044,"score_spread":0.10745779820102741,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3110458959","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017674936,0.061349653,0.00069531985,0.045860752,0.0037663972,0.000023252713,0.00035722743,0.00005375396,0.8702187],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.57563984,0.048053242,0.0007900051,0.004735228,0.003735717,0.000066739274,0.0005052745,0.0001673758,0.3663066],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973526,0.0012977527,0.0001080321,0.00028078107,0.00057322934,0.00038761494],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983064,0.00050440186,0.00024429074,0.00020196768,0.00037747686,0.00036538017],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015776805,0.00035029478,0.00041997264,0.00172265,0.0050114254,0.011316118,0.0005822187,0.0014542969,0.04104603],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0038923225,0.00012177656,0.00023858152,0.004147762,0.0074984804,0.0034413026,0.0046743425,0.0023729277,0.0044573783],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041210136,0.000027085041,0.0023835339,0.0003872244,0.000009132075,0.00020755705,0.029667577,0.00009057462,0.00015172186,0.81458545,0.0982074,0.054241635],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000024511987,0.000012013957,0.0020509637,0.0005490124,0.0000026397804,0.00014601072,0.009906969,0.000030088779,0.00005781771,0.01331073,0.973925,0.000006303871],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021828897,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022650424,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04104603,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0055202735,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006079945,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13731265},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3112572789","doi":"10.7202/1073787ar","title":"Clinical Research Authorships: Ethics and Problem-Solving","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Bioethics","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Clinical Ethics; Psychology; Engineering ethics; Engineering","score_opus":0.5452340627217493,"score_gpt":0.5209304639491308,"score_spread":0.024303598772618562,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3112572789","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0063639986,0.005777428,0.03461673,0.9149584,0.0040723043,0.00010467183,0.000020006177,0.000049858074,0.034036547],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7342677,0.015101443,0.08922173,0.13111345,0.013765503,0.000677756,0.0000680688,0.00024263423,0.015541644],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.65614665,0.28134668,0.0130175855,0.010219734,0.032314032,0.006955274],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.31259078,0.61419755,0.019810082,0.018535709,0.020098487,0.014767438],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.21833993,0.0007784371,0.0017556946,0.0033096657,0.020915195,0.030246256,0.004130997,0.023861714,0.0045340047],"category_scores_gemma":[0.3346571,0.0008215796,0.0010280601,0.004357886,0.08583215,0.025210345,0.017211592,0.026392872,0.0012528964],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019354287,0.000042499287,0.0011562551,0.0002789316,0.000033798668,0.00044241056,0.01737485,0.0005766296,0.00006497577,0.91945064,0.030084651,0.030475013],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025378236,0.000017126178,0.00024760995,0.0006571199,0.000009194326,0.00045130486,0.013339085,0.00074990897,0.00009613262,0.92479753,0.059571628,0.000038109854],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003151448,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004853678,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9761383,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013934289,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.049487144,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.963926},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3112824261","doi":"10.5539/elt.v14n1p29","title":"EFL Female Students’ Perceptions towards Cheating in Distance Learning Programmes","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"English Language Teaching","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cheating; Psychology; Distance education; Perception; Test (biology); Likert scale; Mathematics education; Medical education; Pedagogy; Social psychology","score_opus":0.018011749075938863,"score_gpt":0.3362502654008799,"score_spread":0.318238516324941,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3112824261","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9974946,0.00015066456,0.000093861,0.0004377192,0.000013643879,0.000010830234,0.00002079023,0.000003670107,0.0017742155],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99702364,0.0002284949,0.000073839255,0.00032086117,0.000010972964,0.000013668206,0.000015611115,0.0000033927302,0.0023095186],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99821585,0.00051587383,0.00013175918,0.00011854545,0.0005631821,0.0004547073],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99507695,0.0013406302,0.001595946,0.00015718603,0.0009263162,0.00090299005],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002050967,0.00033190742,0.00041606216,0.00079863594,0.0020908457,0.0028235284,0.00035048806,0.0009590819,0.008630981],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0057747522,0.00022616444,0.000348481,0.00055831124,0.0011401008,0.0010963985,0.0013144885,0.0010161404,0.0011024326],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028193684,0.0009332821,0.71914583,0.0004372103,0.000048385515,0.0027465995,0.19540268,0.00012895766,0.006599793,0.0008305517,0.0034505187,0.069994256],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013514139,0.0009539898,0.5471417,0.00025595314,0.0000382673,0.002347951,0.43248466,0.0003042644,0.0012893283,0.00026924623,0.014823183,0.00007799027],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003046369,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0041475175,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9990409,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007748784,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00069028785,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028873563},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3114162843","doi":"10.1007/s40979-020-00066-2","title":"In memory of Tracey Bretag: a collection of tributes","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal for Educational Integrity","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.05739798794568996,"score_gpt":0.4023185687896094,"score_spread":0.34492058084391947,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3114162843","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0005877024,0.010657724,0.0005948649,0.64836055,0.3333055,0.000018106048,0.00003716158,0.00006624066,0.006372153],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.017365206,0.009511316,0.0006821973,0.55164164,0.35220537,0.00008140815,0.000067727065,0.00068688294,0.06775834],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9762123,0.008035212,0.0018209411,0.0020828608,0.009134916,0.0027138595],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.92676246,0.033461586,0.0059505305,0.003931686,0.020291124,0.0096027125],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015884232,0.0013591594,0.001940371,0.0029005804,0.025369914,0.029851865,0.0037257753,0.024813248,0.010624325],"category_scores_gemma":[0.13185188,0.0007878494,0.0012104535,0.003771943,0.013129788,0.014166751,0.011355208,0.05345061,0.007087487],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012216189,0.0000080983145,0.000099043515,0.0000591773,0.000008580397,0.00023981943,0.0037580708,0.000012709916,0.00006967724,0.004075329,0.98688555,0.004771681],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000027036267,0.000008396972,0.000116285984,0.00024309018,0.0000072500266,0.00027352694,0.004971688,0.000026511381,0.000098533674,0.001804611,0.9924184,0.000029078761],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008806105,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02313218,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97518677,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0060255285,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011805303,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08400488},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3117849711","doi":"10.1177/0895904820983032","title":"Academic Integrity Policies of Publicly Funded Universities in Western Canada","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Educational Policy","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":97,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary; University of Manitoba","funders":"University of Calgary","keywords":"Academic integrity; Cheating; Misconduct; Punitive damages; Academic dishonesty; Outsourcing; Work (physics); Higher education; Public relations; Political science; Sociology; Psychology; Law; Social psychology; Engineering","score_opus":0.05033612642666445,"score_gpt":0.3541157866073838,"score_spread":0.30377966018071934,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3117849711","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96196556,0.0019949176,0.0006769676,0.013823723,0.000059095706,0.0002582268,0.0007935496,0.000045786284,0.020382237],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9937714,0.00067185936,0.00059269497,0.0013685644,0.000009076023,0.00009707236,0.0001493094,0.000012441399,0.0033276153],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9723292,0.006728649,0.0017616908,0.0014827746,0.00945679,0.008240815],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8669806,0.049473267,0.017587995,0.003806766,0.0456961,0.016455239],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020863034,0.0003091832,0.00079266634,0.00475722,0.03780156,0.011862317,0.0032941676,0.0025145377,0.0024078016],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06274191,0.0007502939,0.00033038226,0.014165365,0.011183641,0.0024161085,0.0043982016,0.0024142358,0.00020391555],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000295627,0.0002868039,0.19876903,0.0010574039,0.00008771718,0.0015180855,0.66019034,0.001992396,0.0021627396,0.045087233,0.017205438,0.07134719],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000372499,0.000087230466,0.1734315,0.00097493624,0.0000514487,0.00014443521,0.7256657,0.0013259929,0.0012459152,0.0026133528,0.094176024,0.00024633305],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9927248,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99408144,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99748546,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.3201871,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.44620964,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7884866},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3119778649","doi":"10.3138/jsp.52.2.03","title":"An Analysis of Recently Retracted Articles by Authors Affiliated with Hospitals in Mainland China","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mainland China; China; Impact factor; Mainland; Web of science; China mainland; Medicine; Library science; MEDLINE; Political science; Family medicine; History; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.014507027765983834,"score_gpt":0.2830212244733336,"score_spread":0.2685141967073498,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3119778649","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9389978,0.043176964,0.0014295239,0.0046274653,0.0008462625,0.0007029646,0.0052745,0.0000917825,0.0048528546],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9681119,0.018584931,0.002939316,0.0017421134,0.0009372452,0.0005661162,0.0043830653,0.00006676305,0.002668591],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.96556073,0.0069064163,0.013465916,0.0019322098,0.010388059,0.0017467402],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.69485897,0.10543789,0.1276255,0.0130311325,0.051940262,0.00710622],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.026645495,0.00063555123,0.0011726605,0.020549169,0.0021290288,0.0027281386,0.0011705623,0.0009967857,0.0034405915],"category_scores_gemma":[0.15246062,0.00034125926,0.0010923862,0.024477968,0.0010779353,0.0023364204,0.0018462499,0.0007107703,0.0008512877],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00055917975,0.000097766046,0.83556706,0.006567246,0.000781112,0.0037488064,0.012473037,0.000099133424,0.0011736604,0.00067300623,0.009975042,0.12828492],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000048779253,0.00019676176,0.9364122,0.0024093885,0.00070674485,0.0043502254,0.010821696,0.0003127449,0.0012259437,0.00042762916,0.04299446,0.000093470604],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0055340547,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008894416,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99900323,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027090982,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00863012,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14091653},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3120681508","doi":"10.11575/prism/38551","title":"Alberta Council on Academic Integrity (ACAI) 2019-2020 Annual Report","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Open MIND","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Research integrity; Academic integrity; Annual report; Political science; Library science; Business; Accounting; Computer science; Public relations","score_opus":0.12170539932461975,"score_gpt":0.3675773938358649,"score_spread":0.24587199451124514,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3120681508","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0036079132,0.011951157,0.0029769985,0.12488224,0.040827103,0.0018342629,0.06259619,0.0028089362,0.74851525],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.015965903,0.0060061,0.0056211315,0.014681187,0.0019298497,0.00067921996,0.058770716,0.0007900345,0.89555573],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9657944,0.001411615,0.0006886404,0.0008958373,0.026521023,0.004688483],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9180766,0.0018003841,0.0009950923,0.0013227911,0.060626503,0.017178617],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015540635,0.0010724601,0.000979871,0.0046254923,0.0069866613,0.014464327,0.00406733,0.0046718586,0.075982556],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028479869,0.0008823322,0.0007905798,0.0042150076,0.0019767531,0.0020859623,0.00556611,0.0053829183,0.044978935],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013098979,0.000010373347,0.00031558244,0.000054599954,0.000002298062,0.000023119539,0.00005931225,0.000061930776,0.00005741661,0.0030475159,0.98932284,0.0070319334],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005188241,0.000005064562,0.0021565321,0.000103143364,0.0000025535603,0.000011776426,0.00017152462,0.000056291112,0.00007183269,0.0002661781,0.9971348,0.000015224271],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.86207885,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.87607324,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9953281,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06812979,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2966494,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49431854},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3120916333","doi":"10.1002/asi.24582","title":"Does double‐blind peer review reduce bias? Evidence from a top computer science conference","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Institute for Catastrophic Loss Reduction","keywords":"Prestige; Double blind; Peer review; Quality (philosophy); Publication bias; Psychology; Limiting; Computer science; MEDLINE; Political science; Medicine; Alternative medicine; Law","score_opus":0.09497121518925992,"score_gpt":0.3809406796166385,"score_spread":0.2859694644273786,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3120916333","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3259984,0.36125547,0.11862372,0.08584107,0.021763911,0.0137409335,0.0036640707,0.0010592006,0.068053216],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91263455,0.026065975,0.03666202,0.012262493,0.003730479,0.0040685,0.0008982364,0.0005241903,0.0031536657],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.3342925,0.48536623,0.06726262,0.018322412,0.09077095,0.003985302],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.04602125,0.6777242,0.116199166,0.06983262,0.08689992,0.0033229531],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.45761198,0.0014024168,0.00409787,0.0059578572,0.003610458,0.011845158,0.0050799306,0.006053091,0.013389675],"category_scores_gemma":[0.8494596,0.0016055516,0.0061446517,0.0081753805,0.00826542,0.010774338,0.006110386,0.004694982,0.0026242437],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.03815552,0.0018266924,0.10164693,0.12764798,0.054048497,0.0004254458,0.014123583,0.0020889374,0.0035375813,0.01550449,0.0417032,0.59929115],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.028124742,0.018396936,0.3275906,0.13894528,0.068323694,0.0028414805,0.007704548,0.009380893,0.031880993,0.070741616,0.29420388,0.0018652832],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028404156,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031163977,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.542388,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0048225215,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01228343,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.66886103},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121984271","doi":"","title":"The Impact of Technology on Academic Dishonesty: Perspectives from Accounting Faculty","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"˜The œAccounting educators' journal","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Academic dishonesty; Academic integrity; Dishonesty; Medical education; Cheating; Psychology; Control (management); Test (biology); Perspective (graphical); Accounting; Medicine; Business; Social psychology; Management; Computer science","score_opus":0.025793701080016655,"score_gpt":0.3799167651570817,"score_spread":0.35412306407706506,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121984271","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9587913,0.0020404558,0.0007502588,0.015652962,0.00007364429,0.000016314743,0.00003247106,0.000019429894,0.022623276],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99561065,0.0015664137,0.00012427969,0.001271369,0.00007314943,0.0000060681446,0.000008901945,0.00000764945,0.0013315297],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98490924,0.008589867,0.0006378435,0.00043989316,0.0035853796,0.0018377383],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9078075,0.06065603,0.014638469,0.0018669324,0.008559349,0.006471728],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010079457,0.00029732028,0.00033878218,0.0031825623,0.010159636,0.011799663,0.0011210265,0.0025153165,0.0033130383],"category_scores_gemma":[0.043694887,0.0003640557,0.0003781655,0.003252714,0.010388967,0.007138033,0.005257023,0.0028706833,0.00049318996],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000987918,0.0002476804,0.13657676,0.00026538395,0.000024759242,0.002488524,0.79260427,0.0002877584,0.0015620405,0.0073139975,0.0033019898,0.055227995],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006106303,0.0002474611,0.03952137,0.00025768156,0.00002190738,0.0011630064,0.9303161,0.00023372575,0.0012532524,0.0013238499,0.02560316,0.00005239734],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008604855,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009050237,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9974847,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0052873446,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0055118585,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.053305924},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125616451","doi":"","title":"Accounting Students’ Sensitivity to Attributes of Information Integrity","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo; Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Sensitivity (control systems); Accounting; Business; Accounting information system; Engineering","score_opus":0.016503074991754567,"score_gpt":0.31196915865640973,"score_spread":0.29546608366465515,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125616451","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9959835,0.000061555926,0.00007854786,0.0006303957,0.000011310745,0.000007988001,0.000026044838,0.0000053407803,0.0031954276],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995146,0.000032563938,0.000033003293,0.00005712108,0.000004738546,0.0000019379584,0.000015035979,0.0000017381407,0.0003392177],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9921256,0.0025768979,0.0009455824,0.0005085949,0.0029059732,0.0009374126],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8410003,0.049038645,0.068530194,0.009931637,0.019862095,0.011637167],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00958104,0.00020392939,0.00043400162,0.0023342217,0.0017859685,0.0072552315,0.000754144,0.0016136796,0.0049462067],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11583211,0.00032652012,0.0004405185,0.0019853662,0.0025550798,0.0032313399,0.0025366032,0.0035360607,0.00078375236],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00064351794,0.0007047926,0.9560008,0.000046730896,0.00011468277,0.00025474245,0.020661455,0.00036913547,0.0009128257,0.0023373642,0.0008940456,0.017059783],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003584339,0.0005366768,0.9432695,0.000075762306,0.0001076586,0.0005367019,0.041758224,0.0015249416,0.0028749262,0.0050193234,0.004170392,0.000089988585],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005235071,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0053644865,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9983863,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017126201,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018378192,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.050670028},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3126045849","doi":"","title":"The Retraction Penalty: Evidence from the Web of Science","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Web of science; Computer science; Library science; Information retrieval; MEDLINE; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.04295528310462751,"score_gpt":0.33237270555352094,"score_spread":0.28941742244889346,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3126045849","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6238522,0.08003792,0.016193448,0.090825595,0.0028345813,0.00042408024,0.0065318313,0.0006705321,0.17862985],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9726299,0.012494543,0.0030240892,0.0040495913,0.0016619322,0.00013395486,0.0017929646,0.00026539408,0.0039476124],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9265518,0.029703582,0.007810261,0.0075293784,0.025779773,0.002625227],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.19681287,0.55552685,0.14288498,0.055933923,0.04176972,0.0070716203],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.057023197,0.00075201376,0.0014634138,0.011630258,0.0028536331,0.010007895,0.003300439,0.0042145634,0.031259414],"category_scores_gemma":[0.5599923,0.0007699424,0.001302596,0.014383681,0.0070466786,0.016193237,0.0058151307,0.0043893494,0.007449141],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.008566486,0.0008630001,0.46584842,0.00812165,0.0027768807,0.0017464167,0.011939304,0.0022183608,0.0010380638,0.054472215,0.052380484,0.3900287],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012806649,0.0015808846,0.671081,0.0062112412,0.0020433248,0.006910857,0.009920048,0.0068525327,0.0035495658,0.1273942,0.1627251,0.00045053058],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00331241,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001521289,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9957854,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001481882,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034399587,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30157107},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","research_integrity"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","research_integrity"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W3128189296","doi":"10.29173/iasl7587","title":"Transforming Research Tasks to Avoid Plagiarism","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"IASL Annual Conference Proceedings","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Subject (documents); Work (physics); Mathematics education; Sociology; Computer science; Pedagogy; Psychology; Engineering; Library science","score_opus":0.08313534302972549,"score_gpt":0.383393119411484,"score_spread":0.30025777638175855,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3128189296","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25330412,0.0014164714,0.64025164,0.018003354,0.0012010345,0.005366906,0.00023075106,0.0069542965,0.07327152],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.57721436,0.00046350798,0.3963947,0.0020162028,0.0003483445,0.004449388,0.0003346902,0.0015221027,0.017256692],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.85347354,0.10133411,0.010688719,0.009625813,0.020522937,0.0043548276],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.56000125,0.22752999,0.04552862,0.10248587,0.048530493,0.015923776],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.11069875,0.0018408798,0.001450876,0.006049233,0.008891502,0.0175676,0.006301796,0.0042032455,0.005096568],"category_scores_gemma":[0.36113343,0.0016301381,0.0012507722,0.003235731,0.012122938,0.016469974,0.01771069,0.006265718,0.006224406],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010545617,0.0016672355,0.010844512,0.0020243423,0.00012275616,0.00047567443,0.31284058,0.0030891623,0.015202283,0.06913771,0.016757833,0.56678337],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001163362,0.0036003664,0.02016105,0.0023146365,0.00020170047,0.0016533658,0.16776597,0.015285816,0.031215707,0.33345392,0.4225309,0.0006532323],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001304893,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001344578,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99579674,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004883366,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014633873,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.58543795},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["research_integrity"],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"commentary","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W3130913264","doi":"10.1108/jarhe-09-2020-0309","title":"Plagiarism in higher education across nations: a case of language students","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Misconduct; Section (typography); Scale (ratio); Psychology; Higher education; Social psychology; Mathematics education; Geography; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.11232353317028608,"score_gpt":0.509205581967977,"score_spread":0.39688204879769096,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3130913264","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9967043,0.00026880743,0.0001307983,0.00086004596,0.000009221246,0.000017624527,0.000007780397,0.0000055336577,0.001995886],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99813974,0.000310998,0.00017696184,0.0002473248,0.000016907272,0.000008659685,0.000006904352,0.0000035284706,0.001089001],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966979,0.0015107415,0.00021673056,0.0002181244,0.0005500024,0.0008065656],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99102306,0.0027660127,0.001985508,0.00035692015,0.0007769438,0.0030914214],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029503172,0.0006356406,0.0005407858,0.0026636005,0.015631715,0.0039824857,0.0012655086,0.0036240937,0.00289094],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008807857,0.0003480389,0.0005353693,0.0027990763,0.004071282,0.0016894564,0.003460632,0.0028769388,0.00037437156],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000715284,0.00064860604,0.14657512,0.00024360567,0.000030173065,0.11222566,0.71300393,0.00022023053,0.0012840661,0.0030208668,0.0016479405,0.021028219],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012907904,0.00029916863,0.06587503,0.0002164317,0.000032191365,0.08248379,0.83323544,0.0007211989,0.0010188917,0.0010855582,0.014947295,0.00007197735],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04157722,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06680361,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9963759,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007311079,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0045394334,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08267045},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3131781382","doi":"10.3819/ccbr.2020.150008","title":"Teaching animal learning and cognition: adapting to the online environment","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Comparative Cognition & Behavior Reviews","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Queen's University","keywords":"Comparative cognition; Animal behavior; Animal cognition; Animal learning; Psychology; Cognition; Cognitive science; Comparative psychology; Cognitive psychology; Neuroscience; Biology; Zoology","score_opus":0.21396188752476203,"score_gpt":0.4104511649920633,"score_spread":0.19648927746730127,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3131781382","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.28404284,0.003842372,0.056171715,0.042594638,0.0023959614,0.00033195844,0.00047675314,0.0020955685,0.6080482],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8776136,0.0037398872,0.033643533,0.005942453,0.0009547204,0.00041059311,0.0004600067,0.00074251834,0.07649268],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99916553,0.00047670398,0.000021655314,0.00009511643,0.00017204334,0.000069013484],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99446267,0.0027292718,0.00035559753,0.0012195872,0.0004921517,0.0007407007],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019397434,0.00021791625,0.0001958563,0.0004527073,0.00081357395,0.0027359661,0.0007631533,0.0010765904,0.0508474],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011862323,0.00017331031,0.0003291486,0.00039546544,0.0021245203,0.0036161868,0.0021607575,0.0013936855,0.01300611],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003589111,0.001637924,0.015192157,0.0010486788,0.00007636456,0.00030953292,0.009160575,0.0014703932,0.018621303,0.0814538,0.13984194,0.7308284],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014925975,0.0009681052,0.042053744,0.00071379315,0.0000728879,0.0005424579,0.0054903994,0.0033736937,0.012374564,0.2193616,0.71480525,0.00009423727],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00057311275,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012316944,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0508474,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000742186,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007251875,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17010146},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3133133069","doi":"10.1177/1715163521992037","title":"Pharmacists must combat mis/disinformation!","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Pharmacists Journal / Revue des Pharmaciens du Canada","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Disinformation; Internet privacy; Medicine; Business; Computer security; Computer science; World Wide Web; Social media","score_opus":0.03776836468970985,"score_gpt":0.29763429674226016,"score_spread":0.2598659320525503,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3133133069","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000743812,0.0030571052,0.00037511217,0.96993667,0.0058533303,0.000014264506,0.000038992883,0.00012958059,0.01985107],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.055392522,0.009905169,0.0024260236,0.8175769,0.013194442,0.000046046796,0.00013211671,0.000304492,0.10102232],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9463032,0.014347657,0.0021549694,0.0019455588,0.0286824,0.006566187],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.69417274,0.050146792,0.022134306,0.014098252,0.15294364,0.06650439],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.031084076,0.000976435,0.0011939654,0.0035527556,0.021867631,0.02852706,0.002629167,0.025986334,0.043458335],"category_scores_gemma":[0.20656936,0.0009915252,0.00086865487,0.0025623085,0.02230188,0.020557938,0.010432511,0.029301716,0.030734746],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003402716,0.000049096405,0.002240133,0.00016784029,0.000028924065,0.0003065042,0.0031258091,0.000029407218,0.00013574296,0.011147692,0.9411398,0.041594997],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002436283,0.000036970152,0.00214286,0.0007036907,0.000031044146,0.00077469525,0.009258189,0.00006940298,0.00028550142,0.015624094,0.9709817,0.000067537716],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12333704,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16195549,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12333704,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013162111,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.10960557,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24523824},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3133498523","doi":"10.1016/j.jpsychores.2021.110412","title":"When is lack of scientific integrity a reason for retracting a paper? A case study","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Psychosomatic Research","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Scientific misconduct; Misconduct; Rigour; Randomized controlled trial; Psychology; Retract; MEDLINE; Clinical trial; Research ethics; Intervention (counseling); Medicine; Alternative medicine; Law; Psychiatry; Political science; Surgery; Pathology","score_opus":0.35483027971296704,"score_gpt":0.5416823567239716,"score_spread":0.18685207701100454,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3133498523","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8746293,0.008355856,0.009076552,0.082874276,0.0020909721,0.0008193751,0.000109161636,0.00010746596,0.021936897],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97993624,0.0024545945,0.0065689865,0.0051008295,0.0006149692,0.00012113585,0.000033919405,0.000064218475,0.0051051266],"study_design_codex":"case_report","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9653432,0.019541478,0.0044786953,0.0017258809,0.006196469,0.0027142416],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7388797,0.20087355,0.025747433,0.007935371,0.0138631575,0.012700886],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.032584295,0.0006455354,0.0010314205,0.0040139384,0.014144797,0.008450304,0.0035866806,0.01652362,0.0062407088],"category_scores_gemma":[0.24188638,0.0009057545,0.0017722296,0.002567328,0.0071886983,0.006234827,0.0043351147,0.010189636,0.0007332786],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007225282,0.0024696186,0.06805784,0.0011100156,0.00019835317,0.6043284,0.22984813,0.00049870927,0.0024556785,0.017135486,0.012427341,0.060747936],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012012792,0.0009898786,0.015492754,0.002517783,0.00027585126,0.6116525,0.2876425,0.0021195824,0.0027450724,0.011082039,0.06508683,0.00027508705],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032533524,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0041881823,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9834764,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0057752696,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0068252673,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1723243},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3134778826","doi":"10.29173/irie272","title":"A Study of Students' Perception","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The International Review of Information Ethics","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Commit; Perception; Perspective (graphical); The Internet; Phenomenon; Psychology; Order (exchange); Internet privacy; Social psychology; Computer science; World Wide Web; Epistemology","score_opus":0.05978344441243551,"score_gpt":0.4298145168908046,"score_spread":0.3700310724783691,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3134778826","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99744296,0.00007756263,0.00014680669,0.00019958473,0.000011694759,0.000021471546,0.000029782299,0.0000058658475,0.0020643258],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985551,0.000085465115,0.000060499897,0.00009347469,0.000010098241,0.000021049053,0.000019614261,0.0000031282057,0.001151547],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99655557,0.0013715416,0.00023057127,0.00027213732,0.001144324,0.0004259705],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97657245,0.008244529,0.0054050954,0.0010072934,0.0047917324,0.0039789695],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003126529,0.00036252112,0.0006550964,0.0020089077,0.0022285192,0.004228719,0.00047403818,0.0011221765,0.0038948855],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023802515,0.00032271544,0.00046385988,0.0014611523,0.0017641388,0.0018553116,0.0023111447,0.0027414332,0.0011585756],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002997619,0.0021472485,0.5108816,0.00019496393,0.000053520675,0.00073211495,0.43477198,0.00006722671,0.004605612,0.0010109596,0.0014839962,0.043751024],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004350162,0.001978045,0.439685,0.00012846067,0.000060405004,0.00083794206,0.53759056,0.0004185228,0.0025950833,0.00065915374,0.015910918,0.00009249218],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021075185,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015889223,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9988778,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011786922,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00090181915,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.016534865},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3135000317","doi":"10.1186/s41073-021-00108-4","title":"Steps toward preregistration of research on research integrity","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research Integrity and Peer Review","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Women's College Research Institute","keywords":"Research integrity; USable; Psychology; Data integrity; Set (abstract data type); Documentation; Data collection; Qualitative research; Computer science; Data science; Public relations; Sociology; Political science; World Wide Web; Database; Social science","score_opus":0.6142879617107355,"score_gpt":0.5984877638154373,"score_spread":0.015800197895298185,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3135000317","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"reproducibility","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"reproducibility","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02022074,0.010702402,0.39842138,0.42332825,0.02507076,0.07312071,0.0011627069,0.007513729,0.040459424],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1058921,0.005807089,0.7112831,0.06841042,0.008375788,0.07879194,0.0015228532,0.0025455763,0.017371213],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.109699085,0.656961,0.13828017,0.015861616,0.062127016,0.017071085],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.032396212,0.3979704,0.08739,0.20812483,0.25210443,0.022014122],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.8588083,0.0031465655,0.0065403366,0.030585917,0.019678153,0.039076682,0.020606639,0.032024466,0.014491671],"category_scores_gemma":[0.86620355,0.008069797,0.010293717,0.02505548,0.024136676,0.046583995,0.03901731,0.061458793,0.017558744],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0023337498,0.0014841545,0.011655942,0.015331324,0.0007227455,0.0015313134,0.101510614,0.0016038357,0.00716854,0.09452978,0.2577533,0.5043747],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008801081,0.0019995752,0.021384584,0.021890013,0.00048837764,0.001347782,0.03308044,0.0027289984,0.011583338,0.05315878,0.85029954,0.0011585231],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00749143,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0076143323,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96797556,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.025874438,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.24135989,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18773305},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"domain":"methods","study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"methods","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity","open_science"],"domain":"reproducibility","study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"commentary","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W3135616835","doi":"10.1145/3408877.3432515","title":"A Multi-Course Report on the Experience of Unplanned Online Exams","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Online course; Computer science; Online assessment; Process (computing); Multimedia; Course (navigation); Online learning; Massive open online course; Mathematics education; Medical education; World Wide Web; Psychology; Engineering; Medicine","score_opus":0.06531177139361302,"score_gpt":0.3701846976789908,"score_spread":0.30487292628537777,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3135616835","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9919743,0.00026617406,0.002286725,0.0007980095,0.00013208542,0.00007917883,0.00018939986,0.00016865617,0.0041054436],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9881811,0.0004077279,0.0017913476,0.00039729953,0.00011471607,0.00007434495,0.00028780627,0.00010633914,0.008639213],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961034,0.0017179176,0.0002860997,0.00035860314,0.0008742858,0.0006596819],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96956974,0.013237073,0.004673085,0.0021450806,0.0034129126,0.006962089],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0048418357,0.0009235277,0.00049144356,0.0014943428,0.0037805857,0.0025690163,0.0012753468,0.0013333516,0.0049256133],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029854428,0.00048671884,0.00050221843,0.0008776087,0.0016354036,0.0018237889,0.0042502964,0.0023938003,0.0014135905],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00041217072,0.003304403,0.22868429,0.00049686944,0.000108907756,0.0227279,0.5324004,0.0008655208,0.013172651,0.001053043,0.014327124,0.18244676],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027773336,0.004817235,0.35766605,0.00038076204,0.000098155346,0.023142947,0.43821,0.0022128967,0.009689949,0.0007473802,0.16268054,0.00032626206],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023131731,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0065312805,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99866664,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008422738,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009989475,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.025606394},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3137605202","doi":"10.5430/ijhe.v10n4p235","title":"The Academic Ethics of Graduate Students at Yarmouk University: From the Point of View of the Students Themselves","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Higher Education","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Graduate students; Degree (music); Point (geometry); Mathematics education; Significant difference; Sample (material); Academic year; Medical education; Pedagogy; Mathematics; Medicine; Statistics","score_opus":0.06198941008661722,"score_gpt":0.41320646379003995,"score_spread":0.3512170537034227,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3137605202","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99574465,0.00021886718,0.00016255368,0.0013156369,0.000016786369,0.000010170444,0.000006962334,0.0000023712557,0.0025220425],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988558,0.00020321946,0.000100860874,0.0001918153,0.000013639794,0.0000056648146,0.000007063368,0.0000011789413,0.0006207334],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99665797,0.001596958,0.00016624361,0.00013331833,0.00091701304,0.0005284975],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99303365,0.0011817078,0.0017366932,0.0002136926,0.0010093494,0.002824946],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031329587,0.00019160972,0.00031184484,0.00069727085,0.0024356837,0.00413949,0.00040818375,0.00091631594,0.0015522785],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008608294,0.00019672698,0.00019952965,0.00060006295,0.0037321227,0.0012348061,0.002445439,0.00190333,0.00029749863],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012155218,0.0006250436,0.57439923,0.00024256858,0.000038312264,0.001504389,0.3555181,0.00022149399,0.0046998914,0.0070104147,0.0034513893,0.052167546],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014641241,0.00058621715,0.34893396,0.00023287561,0.000014065421,0.0021670242,0.6231303,0.00045623342,0.00097141834,0.0029305676,0.020508235,0.000054340944],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011095358,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001845041,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9990837,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012246234,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002874546,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01656884},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3140353001","doi":"","title":"An Examination of Institutional Structures, Policy, Narratives and Professorial and Other Stakeholder Perceptions and Experiences vis-à-vis Academic Integrity","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Office of International Science and Engineering; University of Toronto","keywords":"Stakeholder; Academic integrity; Narrative; Perception; Political science; Public administration; Public relations; Psychology; Social psychology; Art; Literature","score_opus":0.06475491706590825,"score_gpt":0.41338228828410023,"score_spread":0.348627371218192,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3140353001","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9900849,0.00018939153,0.00026781354,0.0027991883,0.000012832377,0.000026012829,0.00009151618,0.00000499583,0.006523383],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972899,0.00026730885,0.0001494932,0.00020964771,0.000008940478,0.000020533536,0.000046826888,0.0000054441884,0.002002094],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9930728,0.003265064,0.00034927198,0.00033756305,0.0017725751,0.0012027696],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9811025,0.008805694,0.0038278617,0.00073437387,0.0028588925,0.0026707202],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008335198,0.00017154652,0.00031735504,0.0021572597,0.010471151,0.0069743292,0.001109289,0.000694276,0.0029534777],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014467923,0.0002867141,0.00020158457,0.003409498,0.008244862,0.0041523124,0.0062286695,0.0019316319,0.0002528129],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013151158,0.000016681015,0.025062203,0.00003189671,0.0000025073587,0.00020360124,0.96640766,0.00002208085,0.00059661356,0.0018071975,0.0006472949,0.005189085],"study_design_scores_gemma":[4.969591e-7,0.000008905867,0.015410347,0.000025961,0.0000010293767,0.00003800958,0.9785088,0.000019286894,0.00014473202,0.000100070494,0.005736551,0.0000058682017],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.19181822,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3890774,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9993057,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01824359,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019877383,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38140345},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3152916307","doi":"10.3138/jsp.52.3.03","title":"Do Journals’ Author Guidelines Tell Us What We Need to Know about Plagiarism?","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Copying; Publication; Originality; Citation; Plagiarism detection; Readability; Allowance (engineering); Academic integrity; Work (physics); Computer science; Psychology; Library science; Law; Political science; Social psychology; Information retrieval; Creativity","score_opus":0.08486452607422508,"score_gpt":0.37348253959160543,"score_spread":0.28861801351738037,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3152916307","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9016364,0.012643905,0.013183,0.04287451,0.00091070315,0.00041788502,0.001203051,0.00024134973,0.02688919],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9840375,0.0034570314,0.0065099667,0.003942098,0.00029350765,0.0002311757,0.00037720366,0.00009334216,0.0010580578],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.86031514,0.06767796,0.02385873,0.0040151468,0.04133726,0.0027957428],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.25719783,0.47073612,0.13444526,0.02630368,0.104036815,0.007280279],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.094505325,0.00022601744,0.0011598113,0.010037001,0.0022924663,0.0072847344,0.0012298386,0.0019362734,0.002050201],"category_scores_gemma":[0.5614839,0.00060967036,0.00063870306,0.0155073535,0.005101759,0.014519809,0.002527785,0.0023862703,0.0010147106],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00039249336,0.00023916691,0.58800846,0.0029581767,0.00052640005,0.00029728914,0.11284929,0.00030043544,0.0017480311,0.011120319,0.016765319,0.26479462],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000087605,0.00064584054,0.7511234,0.0035388262,0.00030761355,0.0008336173,0.13119575,0.00086968485,0.0017142799,0.026720375,0.08270666,0.0002563026],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034058138,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006212793,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99806374,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004411652,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007908253,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49979788},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"domain":"reporting","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"domain":null,"study_design":"qualitative","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W3153485877","doi":"10.1080/00131857.2021.1897574","title":"The case for academic plagiarism education: A PESA Executive collective writing project","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Educational Philosophy and Theory","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Pedagogy; Higher education; Academic integrity; Executive summary; Mathematics education; Engineering ethics; Political science; Psychology; Law; Social psychology; Business; Engineering","score_opus":0.03521894724458988,"score_gpt":0.35369516339099993,"score_spread":0.3184762161464101,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3153485877","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05689697,0.0058954554,0.0036269997,0.5730651,0.0024887098,0.000098752884,0.000057523986,0.0002021303,0.35766837],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6638781,0.0023580734,0.0024516657,0.05960722,0.0017722137,0.00024031858,0.000075379474,0.00035439813,0.26926264],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9789981,0.009856277,0.00087716687,0.001897409,0.0045886873,0.0037823727],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9411286,0.029435337,0.003306551,0.007202359,0.008287887,0.01063924],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.037013687,0.000389636,0.0005509447,0.0019085848,0.029778639,0.022371033,0.003287772,0.0180352,0.020064896],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06308497,0.00041589755,0.0005683315,0.0021327436,0.02094918,0.016027162,0.018563746,0.014065359,0.004808769],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033723256,0.00018535678,0.0024350206,0.00015812308,0.000014002602,0.0019631123,0.04539689,0.00021176253,0.00020325683,0.6103012,0.27060568,0.06849182],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021829928,0.000044104905,0.0014349181,0.0005900065,0.000009689078,0.0007231658,0.039340634,0.00030547674,0.00033663868,0.09560305,0.86155146,0.00003905168],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0065888166,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009969577,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9819648,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00796681,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019412214,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19574946},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["research_integrity"],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["research_integrity","scholarly_communication"],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"commentary","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W3155234390","doi":"10.1177/0956797620977513","title":"Effects of Trust and Threat Messaging on Academic Cheating: A Field Study","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Psychological Science","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Cheating; Psychology; Social psychology; Field (mathematics); Academic integrity; Internet privacy; Applied psychology; Computer security; Computer science","score_opus":0.040383684234241435,"score_gpt":0.4171003442903944,"score_spread":0.37671666005615295,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3155234390","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99854517,0.000018026225,0.00017924065,0.00010691778,0.000020459707,0.0003972765,0.00004955957,0.000008808923,0.0006745722],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962048,0.000055735538,0.0009752235,0.0002606719,0.00004830732,0.0010372807,0.00006995838,0.000007403852,0.0013406159],"study_design_codex":"nonrandomized_trial","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99238425,0.0050349794,0.0003600421,0.0009162267,0.0006088599,0.0006956369],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8911693,0.07488581,0.0111789275,0.010876722,0.004513586,0.007375507],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01314457,0.0010828756,0.000914148,0.0010517826,0.0039442154,0.0022695055,0.0014031703,0.002258464,0.0081253005],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04625535,0.0008726203,0.0008754251,0.0005120487,0.0028404668,0.002078015,0.0014896883,0.004316171,0.0012259849],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.033850104,0.68909484,0.1520139,0.00081318105,0.00038313773,0.00091325527,0.038244255,0.0010424712,0.008828167,0.001713231,0.0033176204,0.069785856],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.013808409,0.46519798,0.45474678,0.00047643125,0.00061842933,0.000766282,0.040196173,0.0064274925,0.0075718197,0.0035967596,0.006248822,0.00034453254],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025056456,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021047355,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9977415,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014354502,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002279132,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06951594},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3161561699","doi":"10.2196/23834","title":"Efficiency, Usability, and Outcomes of Proctored Next-Level Exams for Proficiency Testing in Primary Care Education: Observational Study","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"JMIR Formative Research","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Usability; Observational study; Test (biology); Psychological intervention; Medical education; Supervisor; Psychology; Computer science; Medicine; Nursing","score_opus":0.34156035207814806,"score_gpt":0.49862004222987466,"score_spread":0.1570596901517266,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3161561699","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9989955,0.000100492245,0.00013066673,0.000038914142,0.0000056182685,0.0002273088,0.00013411425,0.000006654594,0.0003608099],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987746,0.000113817594,0.00044212947,0.000060057166,0.000015033003,0.00026044858,0.00015640535,0.000006185303,0.00017135392],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99138194,0.003915907,0.0012522002,0.00081973994,0.0019260463,0.0007041705],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96680284,0.014854196,0.00838245,0.0018988008,0.0046983385,0.0033632987],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009675757,0.00047051703,0.0009635194,0.0017195336,0.0012944932,0.0014090368,0.0008566076,0.0011276384,0.0017370171],"category_scores_gemma":[0.038364213,0.00065232144,0.0016592023,0.0010709985,0.00092625414,0.0012449666,0.0014049246,0.0015252641,0.00046074245],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00051727786,0.005478074,0.9655485,0.00039670657,0.00022429042,0.00034211832,0.011232139,0.000114505,0.00047844922,0.000031201755,0.00077856274,0.014858287],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007427068,0.0058002793,0.98548025,0.00009854913,0.00012483895,0.0002626208,0.0065951343,0.0005235857,0.0002883063,0.00003331352,0.00067376235,0.00004517169],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037584442,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005922105,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009675757,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012141308,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016330851,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.051170886},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3163402237","doi":"10.1007/s10805-021-09412-6","title":"Academic Integrity Education Across the Canadian Higher Education Landscape","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Academic Ethics","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary; Humber Polytechnic","funders":"","keywords":"Academic integrity; Higher education; Medical education; Political science; Library science; Medicine","score_opus":0.09033786103858327,"score_gpt":0.43728614511354813,"score_spread":0.34694828407496486,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3163402237","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.30997857,0.010560775,0.001400176,0.4857515,0.001295386,0.00015481938,0.00038993105,0.00012616986,0.19034256],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95875895,0.003117759,0.00063756166,0.014452568,0.00016695012,0.000026085323,0.00007813066,0.000050532337,0.022711413],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9714475,0.004794858,0.0006594197,0.001689166,0.010247606,0.011161395],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.86619586,0.02016481,0.005214155,0.0019737831,0.043924604,0.06252686],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019724788,0.00035852962,0.0008085588,0.00520734,0.05021805,0.022971291,0.0034195501,0.0052831955,0.017258346],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04695044,0.00067903963,0.00068723294,0.008615299,0.019147996,0.006011794,0.012512103,0.010105863,0.0007113717],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003130427,0.0004109765,0.09743822,0.0009517074,0.00012799072,0.0020372865,0.13761927,0.0015433356,0.0012759767,0.34619,0.15684207,0.2552502],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000726324,0.0001331417,0.2274629,0.0016879482,0.000070513306,0.00063502666,0.1997811,0.001209166,0.00061331573,0.02568052,0.54234135,0.00031246484],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9826151,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99547887,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9947168,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.2656098,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.52589196,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8517885},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3174350654","doi":"10.1108/jd-01-2021-0018","title":"Do they practice what they preach? The presence of problematic citations in business ethics research","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Documentation","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; Ontario Tech University","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Business ethics; Originality; Minor (academic); Value (mathematics); Citation analysis; Research ethics; Computer science; Psychology; Sociology; Social science; Library science; Public relations; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.1400330230487862,"score_gpt":0.48422085709694807,"score_spread":0.3441878340481619,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3174350654","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6834683,0.03342459,0.02196718,0.1796557,0.00375812,0.0003577874,0.00023480265,0.00024106607,0.07689241],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9637232,0.008848905,0.0067149773,0.014024789,0.0011211798,0.00019850476,0.00008336264,0.00012728813,0.0051578223],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.8845047,0.064721614,0.010096456,0.0066083535,0.030539148,0.003529761],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.42852804,0.33885533,0.12324721,0.031718425,0.0642147,0.013436338],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.077556945,0.00037225834,0.00088171114,0.010629539,0.007975863,0.013253555,0.0022117526,0.0064053927,0.0050542066],"category_scores_gemma":[0.48674437,0.00075281813,0.0006043524,0.011398038,0.015981004,0.017255548,0.00776462,0.004380583,0.0016553064],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022086565,0.00023842392,0.26199207,0.0021768338,0.00030678842,0.0028920644,0.31148228,0.00035545393,0.0010659957,0.088794105,0.024168953,0.3063061],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011844505,0.00038085578,0.12481586,0.008577968,0.00027345543,0.0053614522,0.36378708,0.0013256307,0.0016761346,0.24305981,0.2503411,0.00028215212],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032170024,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0052637253,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98937047,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0049951267,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011226185,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41016525},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3174687450","doi":"10.1093/eurheartj/ehab398","title":"Retractions in medicine: the tip of the iceberg","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Heart Journal","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Sunnybrook Health Science Centre","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Iceberg; Oceanography","score_opus":0.07065087917340626,"score_gpt":0.3575210288480361,"score_spread":0.28687014967462987,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3174687450","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00041643647,0.013095629,0.00022730241,0.9525798,0.02891663,0.000006109439,0.000038966264,0.000028931707,0.0046901456],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.059249833,0.044057347,0.0024811574,0.6098839,0.2660272,0.00008547296,0.00020235668,0.00040091618,0.017611774],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.94058794,0.026431281,0.006842817,0.0032656107,0.019336179,0.0035362307],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.5172708,0.30659795,0.028213745,0.023656541,0.08124595,0.043014966],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.07579329,0.0010997065,0.002443904,0.004612732,0.0075095613,0.018896742,0.0042613638,0.026086703,0.022381088],"category_scores_gemma":[0.38896987,0.00089866086,0.0012743621,0.003802895,0.021837324,0.022349576,0.007918331,0.039177276,0.008531002],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000056441346,0.000029814153,0.000854554,0.00037731792,0.000038562222,0.000270795,0.0014033496,0.000047095367,0.000051427498,0.0385545,0.90959835,0.048717838],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006824566,0.000050206298,0.003159972,0.0043239403,0.000040453695,0.0009847382,0.004964767,0.00021211244,0.00009232176,0.08397751,0.9020319,0.0000937834],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004114602,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0060043926,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9739133,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0066558253,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017457634,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40083802},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"commentary","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["research_integrity"],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"commentary","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W3175444759","doi":"10.1080/08989621.2021.1947810","title":"What difference might retractions make? An estimate of the potential epistemic cost of retractions on meta-analyses","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Accountability in Research","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":50,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ottawa Hospital; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Meta-analysis; Sample size determination; Statistics; Psychology; Publication bias; Epistemology; Econometrics; Confidence interval; Philosophy; Medicine; Mathematics","score_opus":0.47990707220513623,"score_gpt":0.5656053467790647,"score_spread":0.08569827457392848,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3175444759","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.32814702,0.12662329,0.28054675,0.18187498,0.013599453,0.0061522326,0.009843905,0.0016254681,0.051586915],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8815296,0.009561915,0.0896337,0.009349219,0.0038048676,0.002751012,0.001237173,0.00031721487,0.0018152613],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.36529472,0.48625004,0.067626595,0.013654585,0.06297746,0.0041965623],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.03160042,0.89256984,0.034239065,0.028642807,0.0120997485,0.0008480135],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.53317285,0.0021379355,0.004755915,0.011262813,0.0024156002,0.0098281335,0.0042532175,0.00623879,0.006320992],"category_scores_gemma":[0.9086965,0.0016713573,0.012241961,0.01401918,0.0072138235,0.015076537,0.00904395,0.0073784296,0.0010051683],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.011747095,0.00044616824,0.15904768,0.032202605,0.043181356,0.0022442292,0.0071324822,0.02133079,0.0017388155,0.112557,0.030036747,0.57833505],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0038824487,0.0036813295,0.23625238,0.04123437,0.055994235,0.011617616,0.0045030923,0.06035526,0.0077768625,0.4802811,0.092854194,0.0015670616],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025596956,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031240864,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9937612,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0066872896,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005768081,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.57568103},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3176889661","doi":"10.1016/j.cptl.2021.06.039","title":"Does a sudden shift of testing format from closed-book to open-book change the characteristics of test scores on summative final exams?","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Summative assessment; Test (biology); Pharmacy; Test preparation; Medical education; Medicine; Psychology; Computer science; Engineering; Mathematics education; Family medicine; Formative assessment","score_opus":0.11342213387821636,"score_gpt":0.39574011088921657,"score_spread":0.2823179770110002,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3176889661","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99452907,0.00030590262,0.0006382542,0.0014158831,0.00029076717,0.000025192698,0.00024688223,0.00006269329,0.0024853514],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99883014,0.000060399572,0.00022728828,0.00028371613,0.000069301765,0.000008741698,0.00011708327,0.000026562346,0.00037667956],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99740654,0.0005514813,0.00027881732,0.0004826257,0.00092713634,0.0003533025],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9748166,0.010723427,0.00714481,0.001601079,0.0027528128,0.002961282],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031180247,0.0001603035,0.00033389067,0.0011699549,0.00049310416,0.0013378826,0.00068987976,0.0011778746,0.0071795224],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04045583,0.00016615757,0.0004224962,0.0010801187,0.0007270756,0.0011915789,0.0005424478,0.0008924136,0.0015213208],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0020332623,0.00086587283,0.8958718,0.0000841433,0.00010302219,0.0004041845,0.0013529806,0.00018630658,0.010313555,0.00028597878,0.0029270109,0.08557185],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022505088,0.0009260105,0.99480164,0.000021849157,0.000014666465,0.00039504236,0.0009728538,0.00017925067,0.0013704733,0.0001705836,0.0011123205,0.000012733421],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017612627,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016845288,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0071795224,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005050566,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00068884244,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02401793},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3177938779","doi":"10.3389/feduc.2021.639814","title":"Academic Integrity in Online Assessment: A Research Review","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Frontiers in Education","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":285,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Queen's University","keywords":"Academic integrity; Academic dishonesty; Engineering ethics; Suite; Process (computing); Curriculum; Foundation (evidence); Cheating; Computer science; Psychology; Medical education; Knowledge management; Pedagogy; Engineering; Political science; Medicine; Social psychology","score_opus":0.1978644255915193,"score_gpt":0.5458268679857784,"score_spread":0.3479624423942591,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3177938779","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00007855624,0.99922085,0.00006557612,0.00027380642,0.00008104933,0.000014150489,0.000016128126,0.0000024061094,0.00024738142],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0010714787,0.99846727,0.00014514025,0.00017896519,0.00006152714,0.00001897212,0.000016238411,0.0000013312264,0.000039023824],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99394494,0.0021294607,0.0017007277,0.00052786275,0.0015182444,0.00017868889],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9361851,0.052857175,0.004651375,0.0007762083,0.004963612,0.0005665794],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009366777,0.0010025176,0.003054844,0.009006888,0.0008729737,0.0032658235,0.0018328809,0.0026673286,0.0044940854],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0420572,0.0008099716,0.0024043464,0.010998032,0.001774311,0.0038326853,0.0018928878,0.0021107371,0.0009016293],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000081318314,0.00008289395,0.0005703331,0.36392495,0.00074114365,0.00014084595,0.00052052457,0.0001879692,0.00021818663,0.0021766913,0.011108773,0.62024647],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003595837,0.00019128215,0.0030596138,0.683257,0.004030843,0.001010159,0.00073206,0.00010710162,0.00027755607,0.0023400967,0.3049013,0.000057007182],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004823728,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010917374,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9973327,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00197717,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0110861305,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.049536884},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3180796772","doi":"10.1111/bjep.12444","title":"Investigating how autonomy‐supportive teaching moderates the relation between student honesty and premeditated cheating","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"British Journal of Educational Psychology","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Université Laval","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Cheating; Honesty; Psychology; Personality; Autonomy; Social psychology; Trait; Relation (database); Big Five personality traits; Academic integrity","score_opus":0.0425926510258392,"score_gpt":0.3893236450417029,"score_spread":0.3467309940158637,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3180796772","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9995442,0.000022662856,0.000040593703,0.000051971907,0.0000021553324,0.000004133357,0.000012623803,0.0000011591253,0.000320432],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9997758,0.00001123159,0.000042235497,0.000009128232,0.0000029214896,0.000004299085,0.000011329066,7.752739e-7,0.00014233058],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978777,0.0011105085,0.00013120518,0.00025058686,0.00034200112,0.00028802457],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95689887,0.019205587,0.015928635,0.002106141,0.000953594,0.004907088],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025517824,0.00021537735,0.00035818884,0.0004056656,0.00083720766,0.0016401823,0.0004201835,0.0007184199,0.0060920157],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016787456,0.00023823555,0.0004941358,0.0003558319,0.0009972422,0.0006010907,0.0010138998,0.0013649695,0.0003657373],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00037304897,0.0007225573,0.9932915,0.000025191193,0.00008142277,0.000063919215,0.0012760883,0.00007384738,0.0007325555,0.0001791859,0.000067535206,0.0031131161],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009590439,0.00033011305,0.9982267,0.000009724628,0.00003435343,0.000033640266,0.00055957586,0.00030007103,0.00024966814,0.0001334887,0.000108611275,0.0000045864276],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019442276,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0036530923,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9992816,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00064389606,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010513614,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.020379782},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3181716525","doi":"10.24908/pceea.vi0.14845","title":"TRADITIONAL VERSUS OPEN-BOOK EXAMS IN REMOTE COURSE DELIVERY: A NARRATIVE REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Proceedings of the Canadian Engineering Education Association (CEEA)","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"University of Alberta","keywords":"Narrative; Context (archaeology); Construct (python library); Narrative review; Psychology; Process (computing); Medical education; Computer science; Medicine; History; Art; Literature","score_opus":0.033519938485024575,"score_gpt":0.3183284902452035,"score_spread":0.28480855176017894,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3181716525","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0004754691,0.9986199,0.000025044352,0.0003085908,0.000054727203,0.000012136916,0.000021151498,7.9797735e-7,0.00048209823],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0045474973,0.9947877,0.0001289427,0.0003438679,0.000049759088,0.000030306945,0.000024337198,0.0000011342414,0.00008646268],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99663454,0.001447514,0.00072375947,0.00035671637,0.000721347,0.00011606675],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9838006,0.013030398,0.0014658843,0.00015509741,0.0013549561,0.00019307781],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005844126,0.0005178928,0.0015067224,0.0045521017,0.0006707298,0.002690712,0.0010707736,0.0012757538,0.0021698189],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021896446,0.00042914093,0.0008836683,0.006639191,0.0011798902,0.0023399186,0.0012297479,0.0016394742,0.00033397946],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023223805,0.000112435,0.0014254132,0.25215137,0.0005661964,0.00036216286,0.0022924298,0.00012765499,0.00042854392,0.004498228,0.010356018,0.7274473],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006509359,0.0004729682,0.01316737,0.5162378,0.0025930053,0.0022786353,0.0057066362,0.000079002704,0.00057092134,0.001656549,0.4571021,0.00006998885],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0064930846,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017749297,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9987242,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024639012,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007670421,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030907094},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3189067796","doi":"10.1007/978-3-030-71363-8_25","title":"Collaborative Writing: Roles, Authorship &amp; Ethics","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Innovation and change in professional education","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Candidacy; Collaborative writing; Professional writing; Productivity; Engineering ethics; Psychology; Political science; Engineering; Pedagogy; Law","score_opus":0.14597757979986892,"score_gpt":0.44410101931274787,"score_spread":0.29812343951287895,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3189067796","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.001553125,0.035582293,0.027621116,0.025270438,0.0042171576,0.00012832793,0.00005462343,0.00014838675,0.90542465],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1564663,0.024013106,0.030677319,0.0071835443,0.005969583,0.0010645419,0.0001030138,0.00042135117,0.77410126],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98919654,0.007249065,0.00037401423,0.0006306021,0.0021400382,0.0004097513],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9805683,0.015324417,0.0006197535,0.0012503101,0.0013495785,0.00088763394],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009372974,0.000982709,0.00066036754,0.0017241825,0.0050974092,0.01950274,0.0018490482,0.0059975577,0.013095683],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017671708,0.0005135552,0.00028112292,0.0029767076,0.02506971,0.010962017,0.0055033104,0.0054848064,0.0048105423],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006831228,0.000021418113,0.00004681529,0.00013713575,0.0000019867457,0.00004407017,0.0047254744,0.0000868653,0.000079752004,0.87419134,0.07435538,0.046302922],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009073674,0.0000167045,0.0001183257,0.0004365285,0.0000023111854,0.0002662186,0.0023718392,0.0002675916,0.00014573114,0.46109378,0.53525984,0.000012120376],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014475776,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024645363,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99400246,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004013597,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0081291795,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.049569666},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3192444569","doi":"10.3968/12127","title":"Navigating Between Scylla and Charybdis: Research on the Perception of Graduate Students at UCASS on Intentional and Unintentional Plagiarism","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Studies in literature and language","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Perception; Graduate students; Psychology; Perspective (graphical); Academic integrity; Pedagogy; Medical education; Medicine; Social psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.13759698768373302,"score_gpt":0.4833682328233585,"score_spread":0.3457712451396255,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3192444569","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99716634,0.00019583385,0.00017894042,0.00045964663,0.000011332108,0.0000136101025,0.000014031665,0.0000065834874,0.001953814],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99863464,0.00019153522,0.00014229292,0.0001522162,0.000012238249,0.000010761846,0.000020460215,0.00000474009,0.00083111395],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9927741,0.0028899142,0.0007147257,0.00041785964,0.0025269433,0.0006763493],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9623804,0.0120414505,0.013232988,0.001357977,0.004828867,0.006158293],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0074155685,0.0003743469,0.00047495638,0.0021730608,0.0045600426,0.0040589864,0.00078094285,0.0010145748,0.0034477748],"category_scores_gemma":[0.036954716,0.00026135347,0.00041023354,0.0014168641,0.0032525964,0.0033253187,0.0039010341,0.0019961598,0.0005836202],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013715704,0.00022792594,0.32402927,0.0002855597,0.00006687811,0.0008599739,0.63867295,0.000063843654,0.0029012384,0.0009368922,0.0013668787,0.030451441],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013609384,0.0003426019,0.2148635,0.00019090038,0.000036379846,0.00085812033,0.77472734,0.00021011043,0.0006328952,0.00081780966,0.0072394004,0.00006737407],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0044276067,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00489619,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9989854,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016995845,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025861498,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03921771},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["research_integrity"],"domain":null,"study_design":"qualitative","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"domain":"methods","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W3199081311","doi":"10.11575/prism/39221","title":"Updates: Alberta Council on Academic Integrity Contract Cheating Working Group","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Open MIND","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Academic integrity; Cheating; Group (periodic table); Business; Computer security; Political science; Computer science; Psychology; Social psychology; Library science","score_opus":0.15357708630765834,"score_gpt":0.36808233884789293,"score_spread":0.2145052525402346,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3199081311","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0014873653,0.018699786,0.0011497877,0.27131298,0.076795876,0.0013813014,0.034695245,0.0029654573,0.5915122],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0063476455,0.0068473155,0.0017993315,0.025686119,0.009438249,0.00062935223,0.01769302,0.0007327381,0.9308261],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9823115,0.0012379404,0.0007212549,0.0005049672,0.013217435,0.0020069932],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9058217,0.00594356,0.0024414628,0.0030495492,0.06925085,0.013492872],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014435691,0.0015440675,0.0012986091,0.006315705,0.0065596336,0.0097849425,0.004989887,0.01043579,0.22182432],"category_scores_gemma":[0.041658577,0.0010122982,0.0009568088,0.005757497,0.0017922763,0.0042447,0.0046822936,0.007954232,0.122574665],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005273976,0.000008562477,0.000073880874,0.000013425702,5.942239e-7,0.000009185469,0.00002094054,0.0000061304827,0.0000072086023,0.00009881858,0.99516356,0.0045923362],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010537562,0.0000059398108,0.0018432529,0.0001249701,0.0000031306665,0.000016555083,0.00019575973,0.000017585859,0.000029574949,0.00017363077,0.9975629,0.000016229895],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5161951,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6684346,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9895642,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015265085,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06151628,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9733082},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3200991027","doi":"10.1155/2021/4834860","title":"A Scoping Review of Text-Matching Software Used for Student Academic Integrity in Higher Education","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Education Research International","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"University of Calgary","keywords":"Matching (statistics); Identification (biology); Extant taxon; Software; Plagiarism detection; Computer science; Quality (philosophy); Academic integrity; Higher education; Psychology; Mathematics education; Medical education; Information retrieval; Political science; Library science; Medicine","score_opus":0.3374180854405871,"score_gpt":0.6127490934585863,"score_spread":0.2753310080179992,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3200991027","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0015595835,0.9878583,0.0019617465,0.0015055777,0.00064658816,0.003342528,0.00057430257,0.000049975013,0.002501488],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.010910064,0.97620845,0.005187756,0.00089973485,0.00019317222,0.0055147856,0.0005097877,0.0000326981,0.00054356665],"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","domain_scores_codex":[0.95275545,0.019971209,0.016613519,0.0018288322,0.0082253115,0.0006056511],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8158922,0.13142572,0.020708084,0.0042675305,0.026693571,0.0010129302],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05578053,0.0020259097,0.0052109817,0.030688975,0.0024603317,0.0059916307,0.0029884314,0.0036090207,0.006820388],"category_scores_gemma":[0.20658018,0.0015596702,0.006420624,0.028742373,0.002547841,0.0068072737,0.003915837,0.0023050923,0.0013689115],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":"systematic_review","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000119346085,0.00004176827,0.00049880904,0.7750447,0.0012121153,0.00015792536,0.001841058,0.00011593671,0.0004409653,0.0015830091,0.00688737,0.21205692],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000048849062,0.000100496414,0.0010636533,0.9412484,0.0040923003,0.00019995021,0.0008618118,0.000060934395,0.00035813986,0.00074878073,0.051183898,0.000032730248],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0068533714,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017415838,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.996391,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0066107344,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03705195,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29499918},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3201865051","doi":"10.35940/ijbsac.d0465.103521","title":"T ransitioning a L arge Biology Class from a n i n Person t o a n Online Exam During the COVID 19 Pandemic","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Basic Sciences and Applied Computing","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"London Health Sciences Centre; Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Pandemic; Medical education; Class (philosophy); Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2); Psychology; 2019-20 coronavirus outbreak; Medicine; Computer science; Internal medicine; Virology; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.059857272820708754,"score_gpt":0.3445971768490561,"score_spread":0.28473990402834737,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3201865051","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9479228,0.00015601618,0.0031293803,0.005578939,0.00076697976,0.0003049706,0.00066470826,0.0006504963,0.040825695],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9574903,0.00014889786,0.003479321,0.0022283564,0.00023286912,0.00018772903,0.0007773523,0.00009293527,0.035362214],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99728215,0.00068436534,0.00017899688,0.000336557,0.00078567554,0.00073210354],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9792422,0.0017280759,0.0034074904,0.0017225647,0.0030600324,0.010839588],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036732506,0.00046111285,0.00049606006,0.0010554473,0.0030435768,0.004136767,0.001184219,0.0013120876,0.022638435],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019091755,0.0003240618,0.00044880304,0.00051691657,0.00082255685,0.0018232239,0.0034967628,0.0021872825,0.010352702],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0014560843,0.008160838,0.50160164,0.00024186696,0.00009719452,0.0022841834,0.01036055,0.00068061263,0.024605792,0.0021600758,0.11259121,0.33575997],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006349636,0.004416405,0.8458834,0.0001948886,0.000035036133,0.0010103821,0.013082587,0.0017116565,0.017533742,0.0018012815,0.114124864,0.00014222054],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027994637,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011025856,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022638435,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018399004,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024900094,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.075733125},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3202297238","doi":"10.1177/22925503211043167","title":"Decoding Plagiarism and Academic Dishonesty in <i>Plastic Surgery</i>","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"editorial","venue":"Plastic Surgery","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Academic dishonesty; Decoding methods; Academic integrity; Psychology; Computer science; Cheating; Social psychology; Telecommunications","score_opus":0.030394978182814846,"score_gpt":0.29695624225002054,"score_spread":0.2665612640672057,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3202297238","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000044031098,0.005515621,0.00008311454,0.081146784,0.91176903,0.000014435717,0.00006248646,0.000038222897,0.001326189],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00049625593,0.0029283795,0.000066000925,0.021950614,0.97168523,0.000018706789,0.0000284809,0.000031251824,0.0027949922],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9842077,0.00359916,0.0023773822,0.0012535703,0.0076623666,0.0008997625],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8683496,0.07789307,0.006280559,0.0027642644,0.035730354,0.008982041],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019959351,0.0043611275,0.005263221,0.01156385,0.007112729,0.018340966,0.005267876,0.033749808,0.012962965],"category_scores_gemma":[0.118651286,0.0017713021,0.0030887711,0.0054541714,0.006799016,0.008008652,0.0034672834,0.028843166,0.0068660923],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000133376325,0.000005490845,0.000047539856,0.00017361602,0.000017094237,0.000053208412,0.000035770026,0.000010755885,0.000012556831,0.00030483466,0.99611783,0.0032080198],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001557838,0.00004393288,0.0014254153,0.0035443602,0.00024753629,0.0004351355,0.00048465002,0.00035632937,0.00013974214,0.005586891,0.9875101,0.00007016546],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0061905286,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018309275,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98004067,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0077492497,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0094059985,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10555637},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3205188572","doi":"10.11575/cpai.v4i1.72821","title":"Hosting academic integrity events: What can you do with academic integrity at your college or university?","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Calgary","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Academic integrity; Public relations; Higher education; Research integrity; Political science; Engineering ethics; Medical education; Engineering; Medicine; Law","score_opus":0.032193298687578,"score_gpt":0.2680669968645313,"score_spread":0.23587369817695328,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3205188572","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017258031,0.0062165107,0.0020917202,0.94160604,0.0052132076,0.000113915296,0.00008434176,0.0003451495,0.027071087],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6152238,0.031789333,0.0142778745,0.25268042,0.010141385,0.0006489647,0.00051866006,0.001002941,0.073716655],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97033507,0.017604712,0.0011874464,0.001143063,0.0048223846,0.004907189],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.79257536,0.029858325,0.017979175,0.0072552064,0.03274702,0.119584985],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.040455393,0.0008135154,0.0013321254,0.0029974054,0.033054307,0.0435,0.0049503315,0.0145475585,0.018705174],"category_scores_gemma":[0.15027967,0.0007322493,0.00072106445,0.0033392946,0.020919817,0.0380965,0.021828527,0.01995803,0.011475497],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001260626,0.00048117468,0.03634412,0.0009449494,0.00006772666,0.00067938777,0.15222265,0.00012577715,0.00036795015,0.025431408,0.5723093,0.21089943],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024931147,0.0002262819,0.0136450995,0.0022592407,0.000037999656,0.0004773314,0.4736435,0.00019268725,0.00039881736,0.016716318,0.4922092,0.00016857994],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019857815,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.043835275,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9854524,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010859941,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.032359745,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21395111},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3205290715","doi":"10.11575/cpai.v4i1.72852","title":"Championing academic integrity in academic development","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Calgary","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Assiniboine Community College","funders":"","keywords":"Academic integrity; Learning development; Session (web analytics); Officer; Work (physics); Quality (philosophy); Academic community; Higher education; Research integrity; Subject (documents); Medical education; Engineering ethics; Pedagogy; Psychology; Public relations; Computer science; Engineering; Political science; Medicine; Library science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.035217588719002005,"score_gpt":0.281689680743396,"score_spread":0.24647209202439402,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3205290715","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13785353,0.011750185,0.027501855,0.3908796,0.0037063446,0.000540002,0.000058227706,0.00057288574,0.42713732],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9300744,0.0042808047,0.013634131,0.018448688,0.0005584308,0.00030242308,0.000044382847,0.00015095543,0.03250578],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.94645953,0.035354506,0.0018133397,0.0020987538,0.009424311,0.004849519],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8738679,0.040785253,0.012891068,0.010123934,0.032265846,0.03006582],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.039551258,0.00045829586,0.00046669302,0.0027695878,0.014163481,0.021529838,0.0024182736,0.0055860803,0.0069681997],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08117091,0.00061551644,0.00057765446,0.0016442124,0.033073477,0.014100231,0.028052093,0.0086782705,0.0021752],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006936924,0.0005010233,0.030214323,0.0009585824,0.00005782667,0.00087912165,0.32151037,0.00035854755,0.0010640646,0.26678932,0.06659484,0.31100264],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000042995704,0.00024475597,0.017670212,0.002356833,0.000044429587,0.001278906,0.15108038,0.0004593124,0.0023214826,0.09160133,0.73278224,0.00011712337],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009747627,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013410408,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9944139,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012455968,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.039102778,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20916957},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3205630763","doi":"10.11575/cpai.v4i1.72845","title":"You've got this! The fundamental values of academic integrity","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Calgary","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Red River College","funders":"","keywords":"Academic integrity; Session (web analytics); Honesty; Courage; Psychology; Set (abstract data type); Work (physics); Public relations; Internet privacy; Computer science; Social psychology; World Wide Web; Political science; Engineering","score_opus":0.024715711549517277,"score_gpt":0.2681440265401002,"score_spread":0.24342831499058296,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3205630763","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0245712,0.0057145436,0.013183692,0.600778,0.007973209,0.00011291808,0.00017290682,0.00076980423,0.3467237],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.55490756,0.0078080767,0.012392323,0.08430224,0.0031186705,0.00021247345,0.00021670235,0.0008519209,0.3361901],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98103046,0.008952266,0.0005798546,0.0008277061,0.006437513,0.0021722547],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96326506,0.0047387183,0.003395203,0.0050205206,0.010316128,0.013264455],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009516803,0.00047578127,0.0008000748,0.0010695654,0.017780924,0.025134508,0.0013017724,0.0048466926,0.02294127],"category_scores_gemma":[0.039469812,0.00043192043,0.0004752405,0.0011000313,0.025067892,0.014548754,0.014138763,0.014083106,0.014859962],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009012126,0.00015493036,0.00509438,0.00034540688,0.000034568122,0.0005734586,0.12656692,0.00014403026,0.0016403055,0.19749299,0.53041804,0.13744481],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008197888,0.000057946774,0.002447352,0.00036293152,0.000009197376,0.00067078014,0.04674987,0.000069824135,0.00066282274,0.036436617,0.91246426,0.00006026425],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0058878222,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0072583575,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9951533,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005101476,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011647394,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.076746166},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3207425528","doi":"10.1007/s40979-021-00088-4","title":"International students’ knowledge and emotions related to academic integrity at Canadian postsecondary institutions","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal for Educational Integrity","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Red River College; University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Academic integrity; Cheating; Misconduct; Feeling; Psychology; Academic dishonesty; Higher education; Scientific misconduct; Medical education; Reading (process); Social psychology; Public relations; Political science; Medicine; Law","score_opus":0.06153495639984373,"score_gpt":0.4460394232579318,"score_spread":0.38450446685808803,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3207425528","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99453354,0.00013284018,0.00006996556,0.0004942583,0.000018365812,0.000021280674,0.00009745247,0.0000049277805,0.0046274057],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980641,0.0001654459,0.00005436226,0.0001506303,0.000005329872,0.000010883323,0.00006063328,0.000002490373,0.0014860539],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99700564,0.0003310575,0.00009829553,0.00014294115,0.0012616937,0.0011603106],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9853681,0.0012334996,0.002943849,0.00030519962,0.0052424134,0.004906974],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029210686,0.00025277724,0.0005637632,0.0013311951,0.0076136156,0.00433789,0.0009480575,0.0006306881,0.00475513],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010654531,0.00019900622,0.00045738483,0.0016511738,0.002679256,0.000878959,0.002560195,0.0020579228,0.000483336],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014046216,0.00027069548,0.7943482,0.000106503736,0.000033500295,0.0002585067,0.16899225,0.00008227389,0.0007266031,0.00053650024,0.0048405733,0.029664027],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005293315,0.00014170463,0.6667679,0.00010890495,0.00002295707,0.00013055849,0.3240269,0.00016871886,0.00047302493,0.00012213466,0.007977948,0.000053928725],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7455382,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7965384,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9993693,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012027686,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.021630479,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5119208},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3207670544","doi":"10.11575/cpai.v4i1.71341","title":"Towards a supportive math pedagogy: Power dynamics and academic integrity considerations","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Calgary","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Dynamics (music); Mathematics education; Power (physics); Pedagogy; Academic integrity; Misconduct; Social pedagogy; Psychology; Social change; Political science; Social psychology","score_opus":0.03063001247952021,"score_gpt":0.29230318765164487,"score_spread":0.2616731751721247,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3207670544","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.42284825,0.0017541378,0.13006712,0.1623759,0.0006582054,0.0003975122,0.000033218676,0.0002727049,0.281593],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98493874,0.00026277752,0.008738413,0.0015747704,0.000062339226,0.000105155785,0.000005896705,0.000041372874,0.004270625],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97138727,0.020469243,0.0006057501,0.0012041259,0.004950896,0.0013827409],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9604221,0.020948015,0.0041601663,0.003180905,0.0051001394,0.006188656],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021416374,0.00038117997,0.0005430513,0.0022390278,0.012429069,0.018887898,0.0022288223,0.003658777,0.0044379365],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04856105,0.00041151704,0.00035655434,0.0009080388,0.03441759,0.013614143,0.018707622,0.0072429436,0.00091720204],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000045684203,0.00023579631,0.008959003,0.00021319097,0.000023697079,0.00051747484,0.29125303,0.0008078096,0.0014609989,0.6403292,0.003061988,0.05309221],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000045733796,0.00022230165,0.005242336,0.0005914136,0.000023978055,0.00063101086,0.20194252,0.0024024462,0.0027918958,0.6601741,0.1258743,0.0000579924],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024589556,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002904606,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9963412,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0056176707,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013576626,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.113262},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3207674427","doi":"10.11575/cpai.v4i1.70974","title":"Punishment before pedagogy: An exploration of novice writers' experiences of plagiarism in university contexts","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Calgary","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Regina; University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Academic integrity; Punitive damages; Psychology; Context (archaeology); Formative assessment; Perception; Action (physics); Likert scale; Categorization; Qualitative research; Social psychology; Pedagogy; Medical education; Mathematics education; Sociology; Developmental psychology; Political science; Epistemology; Medicine","score_opus":0.0299782397094206,"score_gpt":0.27624243362779755,"score_spread":0.24626419391837695,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3207674427","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99755377,0.00021079594,0.0003755469,0.000261169,0.000012229889,0.000021288073,0.0000070884453,0.00001432203,0.0015438453],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99849844,0.00015375967,0.00033126524,0.00010027935,0.000008614577,0.000012591763,0.000009917105,0.000010641468,0.0008746124],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9890792,0.006685497,0.00050855265,0.0004981497,0.0019772912,0.0012513258],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9608445,0.022913454,0.007342612,0.0018499515,0.0029286467,0.004120887],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008624158,0.0006786741,0.0009448252,0.0018532075,0.011361248,0.0065135476,0.0019909192,0.0021351115,0.001186146],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0447086,0.0006327285,0.00043438055,0.0010525279,0.0069345753,0.0029452874,0.006229759,0.004436199,0.00022010884],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000046555102,0.00011278769,0.013299192,0.00006914222,0.0000065925733,0.00075085275,0.976709,0.000035864625,0.0012606806,0.0003064601,0.00016153825,0.007241421],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010318665,0.00031549996,0.026068417,0.00009944723,0.000011684666,0.0013834459,0.96424353,0.00014760824,0.0010240196,0.00029649024,0.0063609392,0.000038661376],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009237279,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02713133,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9978649,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0050317715,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0049911705,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.045609415},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["research_integrity"],"domain":null,"study_design":"qualitative","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["research_integrity"],"domain":null,"study_design":"qualitative","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W3207890584","doi":"10.11575/cpai.v4i1.72822","title":"Academic integrity at ICM: Successes, challenges and opportunities","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Calgary","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Academic integrity; Misconduct; Presentation (obstetrics); Constructive; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Engineering ethics; Public relations; Order (exchange); Work (physics); Data integrity; Research integrity; Political science; Psychology; Computer science; Computer security; Business; Engineering; Medicine; Law","score_opus":0.07106367323467522,"score_gpt":0.27152187143273476,"score_spread":0.20045819819805955,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3207890584","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6509092,0.0035477981,0.0027271449,0.27203122,0.0016199256,0.00041326915,0.00033672774,0.00029394755,0.06812075],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9513343,0.0022821568,0.0029974123,0.010471514,0.0006039143,0.00015535207,0.00014106277,0.00017289538,0.03184141],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.96262246,0.01603696,0.001336727,0.0013902417,0.012575399,0.0060381256],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7804568,0.046748802,0.021261303,0.010711949,0.058614325,0.08220683],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.054633275,0.00038569444,0.0006579433,0.0040290933,0.04270892,0.022823354,0.003083676,0.0050704563,0.008581416],"category_scores_gemma":[0.14248392,0.000564339,0.00042566154,0.004781245,0.011945937,0.00838247,0.015328485,0.009032837,0.0024866906],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019937595,0.00083310856,0.24425027,0.00061839353,0.000062634266,0.005441804,0.44441384,0.00028302008,0.0027204165,0.020607129,0.0748685,0.2057015],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013543322,0.0004514103,0.10152498,0.0009240013,0.000028545546,0.0014799797,0.64217085,0.00063269574,0.0029879906,0.0055552456,0.24403894,0.00019178442],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.052370694,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.17569207,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99492955,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017888127,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.053806223,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28893185},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3207956080","doi":"10.55016/ojs/cpai.v4i1.71475","title":"Motivators for student academic dishonesty at a medium sized university in Alberta, Canada: Faculty and student perspectives","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Perspectives on Academic Integrity","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"","keywords":"Misconduct; Situational ethics; Psychology; Thematic analysis; Academic dishonesty; Academic integrity; Set (abstract data type); Variety (cybernetics); Scientific misconduct; Medical education; Social psychology; Cheating; Qualitative research; Sociology; Political science; Medicine","score_opus":0.02251240799582146,"score_gpt":0.3126444684131505,"score_spread":0.2901320604173291,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3207956080","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98724556,0.00042072023,0.000077837365,0.0064425035,0.000031589243,0.000030924883,0.00009610788,0.0000075183452,0.0056472467],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965699,0.0005251648,0.00010941398,0.0007034456,0.000015382571,0.000011711386,0.0000379471,0.000004541896,0.0020226305],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99327374,0.0013982011,0.00020966766,0.00031387465,0.0023944513,0.0024100782],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9678505,0.005137338,0.003999788,0.0002749917,0.008060894,0.01467648],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004883584,0.00028117976,0.00044056322,0.0031978637,0.029238373,0.007605157,0.0020212673,0.0014953933,0.0031223525],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013117295,0.0003605923,0.0003270114,0.0045852154,0.006828917,0.0013265869,0.0045914636,0.003094922,0.00020777016],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000096742864,0.00015506362,0.4090326,0.00015264386,0.00002404976,0.0013274886,0.5608283,0.000119137694,0.0010973297,0.0028500746,0.0060188174,0.018297752],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000030937852,0.000043093587,0.15535782,0.00007499366,0.000009124769,0.00013570316,0.83721834,0.00009011761,0.000177632,0.00018139444,0.0066687074,0.000039966268],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95567614,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98682874,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9985046,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07478192,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14085159,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.54258335},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3208147675","doi":"10.11575/cpai.v3i2.71652","title":"My journey to becoming an academic integrity specialist","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Calgary","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Red River College","funders":"","keywords":"Academic integrity; Public relations; Engineering ethics; Political science; Engineering","score_opus":0.0716683310822135,"score_gpt":0.3043994304862878,"score_spread":0.23273109940407433,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3208147675","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0029454078,0.008171716,0.00035422388,0.9643154,0.015855143,0.000030388845,0.000041495252,0.00003910592,0.008247168],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.068156146,0.020882452,0.004244039,0.7186869,0.019065714,0.00025543643,0.00014033345,0.00019022475,0.16837884],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97883534,0.005540618,0.0006959317,0.0013345366,0.0057922537,0.0078012417],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7432558,0.007728681,0.004873374,0.0020611826,0.03068801,0.21139292],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.025137044,0.0009798766,0.0015825537,0.0024086116,0.04030818,0.032598916,0.0042614145,0.020404026,0.028662665],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04792598,0.0011166177,0.0011727829,0.0018678654,0.023041697,0.010749971,0.022019163,0.050749052,0.015612281],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000044300967,0.00020881451,0.0023236247,0.00019164984,0.000028033419,0.00092330936,0.021049503,0.00008254628,0.0002796228,0.015668463,0.9337304,0.025469767],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029430728,0.0001124174,0.0021679667,0.001148713,0.000016310985,0.001356327,0.10260938,0.000075187905,0.00016294856,0.009592042,0.88267416,0.000055018045],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.045909345,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1187483,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97959596,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.020895626,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.11430655,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15160912},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3209674568","doi":"10.7202/1083333ar","title":"Academic Integrity Policy Analysis of Publicly-Funded Universities in Ontario, Canada: A Focus on Contract Cheating","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Educational Administration and Policy","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Fleming College; University of Calgary; University of Toronto; University of Waterloo; University of Manitoba; Humber Polytechnic","funders":"University of South Australia","keywords":"Cheating; Academic integrity; Punitive damages; Public relations; Contract management; Promotion (chess); Political science; Business; Psychology; Marketing; Social psychology; Law","score_opus":0.0323001255123336,"score_gpt":0.3335745380602457,"score_spread":0.3012744125479121,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3209674568","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6625617,0.13066532,0.004261613,0.08265149,0.00074820535,0.0016181299,0.007227483,0.00021370481,0.11005232],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9515592,0.03409514,0.0030901174,0.003976889,0.00010764266,0.00032221925,0.0012554274,0.00007108669,0.0055222134],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.90091115,0.020756949,0.011507793,0.0040621203,0.053595684,0.009166259],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.49267936,0.21420892,0.067615144,0.01162969,0.20195988,0.01190705],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.079224564,0.00038070767,0.0011584979,0.019740764,0.020087969,0.01670327,0.0031374402,0.0017478433,0.0020692437],"category_scores_gemma":[0.21310537,0.0009235269,0.0009044446,0.050535273,0.009329746,0.0049580345,0.004759862,0.0025798893,0.00017340736],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00043927366,0.00014772895,0.3417339,0.022518309,0.00052227214,0.001906621,0.26760566,0.0028081078,0.0028889945,0.053301547,0.044326633,0.2618009],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000043893622,0.000104548686,0.49094355,0.012779475,0.0004686034,0.0004172323,0.19635735,0.001134037,0.0021918106,0.0032031308,0.2920272,0.0003292526],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9858394,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9897885,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99825215,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.32539174,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.5765426,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.78244996},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3210319804","doi":"10.11575/cpai.v3i1.68399","title":"Text-matching software in post-secondary contexts: A systematic review protocol","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"University of Calgary","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Systematic review; Protocol (science); Matching (statistics); Computer science; Software; Software technical review; Data science; Psychology; Software engineering; Software development; MEDLINE; Medicine; Software design; Political science","score_opus":0.024329885589043525,"score_gpt":0.31343585190749174,"score_spread":0.2891059663184482,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3210319804","genre_codex":"protocol","genre_gemma":"protocol","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"protocol","genre_consensus":"protocol","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00036513654,0.0007834459,0.0029795538,0.00043223347,0.00024775034,0.991383,0.0031765134,0.000118156815,0.00051421026],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00023436517,0.00027558085,0.003992248,0.00011977543,0.000019273304,0.99494606,0.00022855106,0.0000074644568,0.00017673644],"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","domain_scores_codex":[0.8985641,0.051660486,0.031323552,0.0057347296,0.009501622,0.0032155712],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8558367,0.06915521,0.018850246,0.017954122,0.03353377,0.004670085],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.18042323,0.0057963105,0.012197746,0.02150033,0.005051819,0.0068204748,0.004788009,0.009703509,0.10208718],"category_scores_gemma":[0.19153947,0.0070872386,0.012307265,0.017466258,0.0063765426,0.009615603,0.0065972707,0.010126425,0.024323411],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":"systematic_review","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0130579155,0.00092110387,0.0016263388,0.700746,0.0021577629,0.0016473719,0.0129790995,0.0026121335,0.0046133487,0.021635372,0.08942664,0.14857696],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.053504862,0.0034688883,0.009684106,0.467128,0.0060338476,0.0010959159,0.0089395195,0.0034069235,0.005780811,0.050376575,0.38917345,0.0014071115],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0069682654,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013493636,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9902965,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012697325,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08269327,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.95418066},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3210545758","doi":"10.11575/cpai.v3i2.71644","title":"COVID-19: A silver lining for academic integrity from a pandemic","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Calgary","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Pandemic; Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2); 2019-20 coronavirus outbreak; Academic integrity; Virology; Medicine; Engineering; Infectious disease (medical specialty); Outbreak; Engineering ethics; Disease; Pathology","score_opus":0.07157699761022303,"score_gpt":0.31125710980363824,"score_spread":0.23968011219341523,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3210545758","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0017054474,0.0022914282,0.00094187574,0.9385301,0.022194767,0.000043676006,0.00009826455,0.000467148,0.033727363],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.04770418,0.002484652,0.0032474233,0.8291298,0.014138649,0.00010699764,0.00027877168,0.0010429735,0.10186652],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.93561643,0.016935272,0.004216984,0.003086986,0.024770869,0.015373466],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.73107594,0.054348633,0.010963732,0.023094313,0.06429285,0.11622456],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.068189636,0.0014218701,0.002362607,0.004165283,0.038621217,0.048808586,0.005616355,0.050216027,0.05465194],"category_scores_gemma":[0.21462198,0.0016534587,0.0019876673,0.0022052336,0.035924762,0.025014387,0.04006826,0.075738676,0.019435843],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036631813,0.000028204502,0.0007251478,0.00006403604,0.000019227067,0.00020826876,0.002384586,0.00004519213,0.0000968089,0.033942282,0.9482969,0.0141527625],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000048960206,0.000062473126,0.0017332402,0.0007006585,0.000019335395,0.00028933326,0.0073929047,0.00012292888,0.0002461178,0.021274624,0.96802104,0.00008826664],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05342979,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10973908,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.949784,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.023573268,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14035453,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36062557},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3210677772","doi":"10.11575/cpai.v4i1.69770","title":"Exploring Rogeting: Implications for Academic Integrity","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Calgary","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Synonym (taxonomy); Academic integrity; Sign (mathematics); Computer science; Linguistics; Psychology; Academic writing; Mathematics education; Social psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.17357844984998344,"score_gpt":0.30420074571160793,"score_spread":0.1306222958616245,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3210677772","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4492631,0.016418852,0.022468647,0.3547764,0.0008946718,0.00032938822,0.00042610214,0.00041727777,0.15500565],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9721915,0.0055707977,0.0075145015,0.007643031,0.0003384726,0.0001513863,0.000108071275,0.00010049881,0.0063815564],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9552538,0.03184884,0.0024252606,0.0022951788,0.0055519505,0.002624949],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6328977,0.25368568,0.050250437,0.015969567,0.036050607,0.011146058],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.039966486,0.000603341,0.0009245216,0.006368282,0.013426727,0.020164775,0.0034158928,0.0042818342,0.009910544],"category_scores_gemma":[0.24513999,0.0005922469,0.00063213595,0.008983939,0.024231225,0.02863718,0.015073207,0.0070907995,0.0015250571],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020576364,0.00027416018,0.084718175,0.0011815995,0.00007291445,0.0027753771,0.6312641,0.0005280319,0.0010287442,0.11226496,0.016901253,0.14878489],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002034887,0.00010843343,0.043842826,0.0021588134,0.00005054525,0.0018477956,0.7240785,0.00090135913,0.001346417,0.16158688,0.063944176,0.00011393286],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012459847,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018234491,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9957182,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007636346,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012736328,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21136546},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3210868138","doi":"10.5430/jnep.v12n3p31","title":"Academic integrity in first-year nursing students: An intergrative review","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Nursing Education and Practice","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Academic integrity; Cheating; Misconduct; Inclusion (mineral); Psychology; Nursing; Intervention (counseling); Registered nurse; Nursing literature; Nurse education; Medical education; Medicine; Alternative medicine; Social psychology; Political science","score_opus":0.11493351469385991,"score_gpt":0.5222523149496908,"score_spread":0.4073188002558309,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3210868138","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0017751453,0.9958956,0.00017396093,0.0010505063,0.00030279867,0.000101162,0.00004838194,0.0000037632076,0.0006487669],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.018201469,0.98008645,0.00049478374,0.0006712868,0.000189777,0.0001709066,0.000051717594,0.0000028887298,0.00013070452],"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","domain_scores_codex":[0.9858883,0.0055792453,0.0039575715,0.00083370035,0.0033853278,0.00035583597],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8671129,0.10260725,0.014181487,0.0017281275,0.013387707,0.0009825956],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017976299,0.00078045484,0.0023512656,0.017933007,0.0014417788,0.0051259366,0.0017516102,0.0024388107,0.0022661304],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07783628,0.00079287105,0.0021488194,0.015528953,0.0021402787,0.0048958394,0.0027603605,0.0017547781,0.0003466022],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":"systematic_review","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010923248,0.0000750882,0.004992586,0.5730067,0.0014015593,0.00043204593,0.0068502584,0.0001785609,0.00035645303,0.003697228,0.007739777,0.40116063],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018831764,0.0001911533,0.009928183,0.89248866,0.0029442785,0.001090317,0.0070069465,0.00009102188,0.00025943673,0.00136543,0.08457249,0.00004324663],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004930802,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015255175,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9975612,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004542736,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018507442,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09506887},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3211031986","doi":"10.11575/cpai.v3i1.69768","title":"Methodological Decisions in Undertaking Academic Integrity Policy Analysis: Considerations for Future Research","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Calgary","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; University of Manitoba; University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Documentation; Research integrity; Engineering ethics; Process (computing); Narrative; Research design; Knowledge management; Data collection; Management science; Public relations; Process management; Political science; Computer science; Sociology; Business; Engineering; Social science","score_opus":0.4241149275057468,"score_gpt":0.4659338483061966,"score_spread":0.0418189208004498,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3211031986","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":"methods","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013028126,0.018743383,0.1437178,0.785291,0.01435797,0.012693566,0.000485975,0.00042146706,0.011260703],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.18055254,0.011932231,0.6035975,0.13169351,0.005153,0.06373506,0.00048278007,0.00052414427,0.0023291726],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.11348037,0.80123484,0.04565446,0.005398518,0.0287326,0.005499235],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.044657767,0.81152457,0.023878157,0.04236823,0.06942396,0.008147318],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.8438811,0.0028181726,0.005588155,0.010300106,0.014985897,0.033291295,0.014363293,0.02098258,0.008149694],"category_scores_gemma":[0.90807915,0.003661838,0.0055521913,0.015607988,0.03846589,0.050230652,0.0160333,0.027935242,0.002339607],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0023043796,0.0019105908,0.023498576,0.026134236,0.0017058194,0.001917832,0.14338858,0.006133601,0.0010837957,0.40561903,0.10824223,0.27806127],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011551469,0.0010815728,0.008421343,0.12132034,0.0012173012,0.0014652798,0.19756137,0.01242029,0.0025246348,0.4649014,0.18671867,0.0012126762],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021441927,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.047282375,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97901744,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.037663013,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1819109,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27326554},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3214512687","doi":"10.1111/medu.14697","title":"<i>I</i> , <i>we</i> and <i>they</i> : A linguistic and narrative exploration of the authorship process","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Medical Education","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Narrative; Agency (philosophy); Context (archaeology); Negotiation; Verb; Psychology; Dialectic; Narrative inquiry; Linguistics; Sociology; Social psychology; Epistemology; Social science","score_opus":0.024050502926030164,"score_gpt":0.35057455352432815,"score_spread":0.326524050598298,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3214512687","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"reporting","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"reporting","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.955379,0.002065161,0.007849785,0.008175605,0.00014350691,0.00013396051,0.00016946216,0.000051945815,0.026031658],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9951456,0.00065632764,0.0018341137,0.0003093058,0.00004678497,0.00006939924,0.00003791958,0.000028997387,0.0018716605],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9871406,0.010738413,0.00029820032,0.00045718948,0.00085877476,0.0005068105],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93952024,0.05122151,0.0043232455,0.0011927315,0.0020967487,0.0016455167],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01572171,0.0005819089,0.00047004546,0.0038988614,0.013364501,0.01155407,0.0017601522,0.0021977748,0.0016519867],"category_scores_gemma":[0.034526892,0.00048902223,0.00039535743,0.0031030846,0.021419642,0.010873211,0.005724395,0.00310298,0.00031862257],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014506283,0.0000067596884,0.001569794,0.000036529465,0.0000020007647,0.00031086814,0.9923388,0.000022400827,0.00023687747,0.003000073,0.00029779854,0.00216361],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005604833,0.000026065552,0.0027779615,0.00026025326,0.000009489621,0.00055874296,0.96763504,0.00030182308,0.00066745986,0.0031388646,0.02459555,0.000023188975],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013282715,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020320028,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9978022,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009569526,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005336084,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08314532},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3216879224","doi":"10.1007/s40979-021-00090-w","title":"Student and faculty perceptions of, and experiences with, academic dishonesty at a medium-sized Canadian university","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal for Educational Integrity","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"University of Lethbridge","keywords":"Academic dishonesty; Cheating; Academic integrity; Honesty; Psychology; Perception; Witness; Dishonesty; Medical education; Educational attainment; Social psychology; Medicine; Political science","score_opus":0.036953735480758636,"score_gpt":0.39202712620430036,"score_spread":0.3550733907235417,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3216879224","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9924346,0.00023926349,0.00013730997,0.001938751,0.00003261559,0.000037388254,0.0001846228,0.00001161741,0.0049838033],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979067,0.00024522605,0.000116632036,0.00031595243,0.000007781659,0.000010864176,0.00005745061,0.0000043973255,0.0013350644],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9959174,0.00063410663,0.00017289595,0.0002819499,0.0016056405,0.001388088],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.972628,0.0024378807,0.0038658478,0.00048024338,0.007119522,0.0134684],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003397329,0.00028772425,0.00039760937,0.0018199693,0.01759603,0.0048527615,0.0016550447,0.0006714551,0.0055758255],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011575808,0.00027957693,0.00030800956,0.0023417685,0.0045870217,0.0012497546,0.0041710148,0.00193468,0.00033858523],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021573773,0.0002021875,0.65979093,0.0002566402,0.00004805856,0.000978869,0.28873423,0.00025439265,0.0024821875,0.0019044573,0.009333292,0.035798926],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000063625257,0.00013361762,0.4445932,0.00024499404,0.000019626425,0.00022895103,0.5366983,0.0002947175,0.0005373181,0.00021754195,0.016923077,0.00010215423],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9416289,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9717652,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99932855,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.038353935,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07626306,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2782786},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4200260839","doi":"10.1097/ans.0000000000000407","title":"Redefining Cheating on Written Exams","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Advances in Nursing Science","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Cambrian College","funders":"","keywords":"Cheating; Value (mathematics); Critical thinking; Psychology; Pedagogy; Resource (disambiguation); Mathematics education; Medical education; Medicine; Computer science; Social psychology","score_opus":0.0191290552941968,"score_gpt":0.37579031552664716,"score_spread":0.35666126023245037,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4200260839","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8925212,0.001292251,0.0598659,0.0063452097,0.0004892979,0.00045895815,0.00011552371,0.0012025719,0.03770905],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9498698,0.00045325467,0.03891011,0.000995705,0.00010318941,0.00014816949,0.000083291714,0.00019198179,0.009244615],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9844142,0.009811861,0.0010509742,0.00073912105,0.0033222155,0.0006615412],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8969657,0.063066915,0.014869274,0.009051445,0.013435609,0.0026109894],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012607218,0.0005239152,0.000514673,0.0013339898,0.0013342357,0.0029875734,0.0010583734,0.0017958662,0.005726203],"category_scores_gemma":[0.13927324,0.00021852441,0.0003789918,0.00043763695,0.0015943462,0.0030516232,0.0032873764,0.0023997382,0.001822974],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011448023,0.0010790147,0.0739998,0.00085862185,0.000093209535,0.0015379552,0.04063762,0.0012444947,0.032256026,0.005924937,0.013250653,0.8279729],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00040905704,0.009748695,0.34940577,0.0063458825,0.0004243011,0.0137185035,0.073749356,0.032679483,0.20121059,0.06104807,0.25053102,0.00072929193],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002760405,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006666191,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9982041,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00069390726,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010796891,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06667411},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4200425828","doi":"10.1016/j.ijcard.2021.12.021","title":"A survey of retractions in the cardiovascular literature","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"International Journal of Cardiology","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":37,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Health Sciences Centre; Sunnybrook Health Science Centre; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Interquartile range; Scientific misconduct; Misconduct; Internal medicine; Alternative medicine; Pathology; Law","score_opus":0.09250250443613138,"score_gpt":0.4167842958079029,"score_spread":0.3242817913717715,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4200425828","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00012602002,0.99862397,0.000029964827,0.0006441509,0.00028287334,0.0000061562714,0.000052185576,0.000003305091,0.00023130889],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0008835068,0.9978993,0.000109304456,0.0006098778,0.00036118546,0.000008525611,0.0000503497,0.0000022706672,0.000075591925],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","domain_scores_codex":[0.99389064,0.0015689499,0.0022428448,0.00052758574,0.0015395724,0.00023047416],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9436689,0.041973945,0.00863806,0.0007012302,0.0041260724,0.000891783],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009016171,0.0011550158,0.0029801002,0.022802413,0.00088497566,0.0030645092,0.0016120279,0.002759988,0.0075095147],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04185672,0.00066382764,0.002155654,0.021049062,0.0016750203,0.0032334712,0.0018716956,0.0020293186,0.0010941838],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016925561,0.00004397575,0.0013940089,0.24938573,0.0006729303,0.00045859587,0.0005287934,0.00013258067,0.00036321956,0.0018524162,0.043636948,0.7013615],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009501052,0.00016225739,0.008523387,0.31838217,0.0027105603,0.004209785,0.00094726885,0.000079310405,0.00024254451,0.0017011152,0.6628669,0.000079701495],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021203142,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0055810767,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99724,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002045169,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0070491745,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.047682643},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity","bibliometrics"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"observational","genre":"review","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"observational","genre":"review","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W4200462098","doi":"10.17985/ijare.951714","title":"Justifying academic dishonesty: A survey of Canadian university students","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Academic Research in Education","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Regina","funders":"","keywords":"Academic dishonesty; Misconduct; Scholarship; Psychology; Academic integrity; Cheating; Dishonesty; Psychological intervention; Sample (material); Higher education; Medical education; Learning development; Social psychology; Political science; Medicine; Law","score_opus":0.18888963930104052,"score_gpt":0.5053053569034738,"score_spread":0.31641571760243326,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4200462098","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99823284,0.00008490542,0.000033304277,0.0002913261,0.000004435834,0.00003920746,0.00014771688,0.000002150824,0.0011642136],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984921,0.00027400546,0.000103036036,0.0002065885,0.0000042405336,0.000015509246,0.00011029134,0.0000019661386,0.0007922538],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970632,0.0003685197,0.00022763092,0.00015097458,0.0014002252,0.00078940665],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9915017,0.001124888,0.0023339696,0.00018685711,0.0026976452,0.0021549426],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002681854,0.0002832367,0.000384076,0.0020587798,0.004542889,0.0019461883,0.0009807345,0.0008386001,0.0017542636],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009468314,0.0003837371,0.00034722793,0.0036070135,0.001765394,0.0006215563,0.0012009563,0.0011439709,0.0003634797],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000053314987,0.00016622375,0.9442692,0.0000774189,0.000015549154,0.00026683157,0.03935366,0.00003956532,0.000502772,0.00017655017,0.0011100391,0.013968959],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000428608,0.00010761234,0.93127805,0.000044447916,0.000008427757,0.00015049074,0.065089986,0.00019132212,0.00014047131,0.000036761812,0.0029180849,0.000029986437],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.87863916,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.91645265,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9991614,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012319142,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014469229,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24415106},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4205491549","doi":"10.7202/1084129ar","title":"A Study on the Propensity to cheat in University Exams: Development and Validation Process of the Questionnaire on Cheating in University Exams (QCUE)","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Mesure et évaluation en éducation","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université TÉLUQ; Université du Québec en Outaouais; Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Cheating; Psychology; Context (archaeology); Scope (computer science); Medical education; Social psychology; Applied psychology; Computer science; Medicine","score_opus":0.07531178128132253,"score_gpt":0.33086308799309305,"score_spread":0.2555513067117705,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4205491549","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9857159,0.0001294865,0.0066917213,0.00028996673,0.00004512582,0.0043446487,0.0004976646,0.0000309082,0.002254649],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96329653,0.0002783475,0.024452882,0.00034373358,0.00004964672,0.00854745,0.0010150968,0.00003351096,0.001982803],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9865762,0.007957845,0.001847732,0.0007153811,0.002373604,0.00052923744],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9252703,0.03889657,0.008000546,0.0064857816,0.018588252,0.002758524],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.035195872,0.0004900087,0.0006794656,0.0038340508,0.0015746392,0.0013266855,0.0009628059,0.0010931419,0.001736468],"category_scores_gemma":[0.057254184,0.0004818405,0.001273799,0.0019759894,0.0014037973,0.001205952,0.0016019125,0.0019030218,0.00066987885],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002315248,0.0033319243,0.8617632,0.00046532962,0.00012525085,0.0002980698,0.028229,0.00041322436,0.0035382013,0.0012436879,0.0016259422,0.09873458],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000083201165,0.0026470427,0.97518176,0.00017078478,0.00006312226,0.00024214548,0.0102585135,0.0013090785,0.0023646075,0.00029463522,0.00731756,0.00006758455],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0064833197,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0068861907,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99890685,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020652707,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004210937,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18613577},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4210372938","doi":"10.1139/facets-2021-0047","title":"What’s integrity got to do with it? Second-year experiences of the Path2Integrity e-learning programme","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"FACETS","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"European Commission","keywords":"Trainer; Medical education; Training (meteorology); Research integrity; Personal Integrity; Pedagogy; Political science; Dissemination; Psychology; Public relations; Engineering; Medicine; Computer science; Social psychology; Geography","score_opus":0.028507312697394368,"score_gpt":0.29538843132737375,"score_spread":0.2668811186299794,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4210372938","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.73665524,0.0013924312,0.009550834,0.10950937,0.0017401258,0.0009668763,0.0002362236,0.00049970584,0.13944913],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93839777,0.0009532184,0.0061414773,0.008727463,0.00025920096,0.00038830045,0.00021727242,0.0002352102,0.044680104],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9747907,0.015018739,0.0005081248,0.0010222875,0.0033304435,0.0053296676],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9566531,0.011230146,0.0024172156,0.0032503842,0.004977151,0.02147196],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.026262466,0.00043920422,0.0005600469,0.00087678846,0.007627275,0.016832946,0.0020286678,0.0038218158,0.008786116],"category_scores_gemma":[0.040885366,0.00037784336,0.00061284745,0.0010914687,0.009464344,0.010427398,0.017736232,0.008980301,0.002245375],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00040907876,0.0023103165,0.035139464,0.0010124536,0.0000470056,0.0014121423,0.6249005,0.00050937745,0.002307671,0.029531414,0.050414264,0.25200623],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008119552,0.0016841831,0.031896938,0.0010847854,0.000022609947,0.0014277946,0.41408753,0.00046830624,0.0034991996,0.007353909,0.53819394,0.00019967246],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002789673,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0040882793,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9961782,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0077162916,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013462873,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13889086},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4212804987","doi":"10.2196/33459","title":"Teaching Students About Plagiarism Using a Serious Game (Plagi-Warfare): Design and Evaluation Study","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"JMIR Serious Games","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Johannesburg","keywords":"Mathematics education; Game mechanics; Game design; Game Developer; Computer science; Multimedia; Psychology","score_opus":0.043993749361939165,"score_gpt":0.3860888950550104,"score_spread":0.3420951456930712,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4212804987","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9870356,0.00012927204,0.0028388095,0.00005301632,0.000029132001,0.008368756,0.0001186509,0.00005079427,0.0013759921],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96172637,0.00035103815,0.015142173,0.00014192992,0.000038413964,0.019696208,0.00027196817,0.000029076768,0.002602869],"study_design_codex":"nonrandomized_trial","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.993324,0.0036077178,0.00072888116,0.00063820527,0.0010216745,0.00067961],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9830983,0.009765227,0.0014570314,0.00070075406,0.0031401992,0.0018383715],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011147792,0.0011717019,0.0012370321,0.0017058321,0.00084986334,0.0011466602,0.0012168405,0.0011783094,0.0037351134],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016458115,0.00055447465,0.0013993385,0.00063306355,0.0014343659,0.0008136426,0.0008748439,0.0011151327,0.0006146304],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.045457058,0.46581858,0.09304977,0.006734965,0.0011599984,0.0011453814,0.027833233,0.0062483153,0.032230146,0.002024311,0.0036768573,0.31462145],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.021527238,0.733033,0.17699897,0.00073104847,0.0013810687,0.00068992155,0.010979713,0.009373175,0.030125484,0.001107619,0.013726427,0.00032637155],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013483191,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019386341,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9988217,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018260699,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017293798,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.058955908},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4214582452","doi":"10.1007/s11192-022-04305-w","title":"Retracted articles in oncology in the last three decades: frequency, reasons, and themes","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scientometrics","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":32,"is_retracted":true,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Clinical Oncology; Oncology; China; Bibliometrics; Editorial board; Radiation oncology; Medicine; Library science; Cancer; Internal medicine; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.06008256517620937,"score_gpt":0.3581804415893788,"score_spread":0.2980978764131694,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4214582452","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.60334915,0.18882623,0.0017907141,0.15994373,0.010818933,0.000291492,0.005528598,0.0003573738,0.029093865],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8969381,0.060862347,0.0016983153,0.013278152,0.0121268695,0.00020428575,0.003495684,0.0002395578,0.011156661],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9617645,0.008807644,0.008587192,0.0027511541,0.015102348,0.002987288],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.55312604,0.18966256,0.12683082,0.017048711,0.08421647,0.029115379],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03779422,0.0005647261,0.0012005154,0.033147357,0.004183694,0.009458346,0.0031480303,0.0037025076,0.005858006],"category_scores_gemma":[0.32256225,0.0004751006,0.0011094644,0.048479415,0.003820612,0.0063013034,0.00716172,0.003488581,0.0014474487],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008952749,0.0003024968,0.53495806,0.008560711,0.0005331344,0.004324418,0.054930713,0.00037149596,0.0015308016,0.008380542,0.08307218,0.30214027],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004958111,0.00025218033,0.6991026,0.0072456677,0.0002354683,0.007207247,0.04870646,0.00033060747,0.0013565741,0.002848975,0.23256692,0.00009778145],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010037825,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0113618,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9962975,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007150679,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010988834,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19987732},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4214655908","doi":"10.7828/ajobg.v2i1.223","title":"Editorial Board","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"Asian Journal of Business and Governance","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Editorial board; Computer science; Library science","score_opus":0.011824834536577702,"score_gpt":0.26767551765033737,"score_spread":0.2558506831137597,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4214655908","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00015973496,0.009099493,0.0007703705,0.04253788,0.8870469,0.00017204444,0.0006747012,0.00057661673,0.05896224],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0026822223,0.015824482,0.00095250516,0.019864837,0.6438065,0.00020534465,0.0010585677,0.00063553074,0.31497002],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99490523,0.000598235,0.0006455179,0.0007752512,0.002680947,0.00039471823],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9526054,0.0034877283,0.0021906972,0.0019502144,0.03404098,0.0057249954],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005136728,0.0019154731,0.001812828,0.004323801,0.0020532473,0.010200414,0.0028846639,0.003989653,0.23813848],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031724256,0.0005922576,0.00095174595,0.0023389906,0.0011056866,0.0049091713,0.0017268298,0.0047987388,0.22325812],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009939498,0.00000372717,0.000023450553,0.000095080235,0.0000018712454,0.000022487553,0.000007856494,0.000009873056,0.00003671337,0.00025184182,0.9858094,0.013727718],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000057272746,0.0000057055395,0.00007588488,0.00014434809,0.0000032209193,0.000050744307,0.000019817136,0.000025243762,0.000043268883,0.0002520548,0.99937063,0.0000034766013],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008925403,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015205462,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7618615,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023134416,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004581106,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.79665256},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4214805546","doi":"10.1007/978-3-030-83255-1_28","title":"Student Academic Misconduct Through a Canadian Legal Lens","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Ethics and integrity in educational contexts","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"University of Guelph","keywords":"Misconduct; Legislature; Context (archaeology); Political science; Order (exchange); Law; Psychology; Business; History","score_opus":0.12540826252532292,"score_gpt":0.4086262463286394,"score_spread":0.28321798380331653,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4214805546","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.026891414,0.007126458,0.0033257224,0.04128383,0.0005434972,0.00006679465,0.00015947255,0.00007156875,0.92053115],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6925509,0.010629685,0.004359511,0.009161985,0.00031325646,0.00004163593,0.000096880685,0.000084454674,0.2827617],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9953538,0.0009422664,0.00007643659,0.0003102805,0.002198505,0.0011187844],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9943116,0.001718819,0.00024712735,0.00016839064,0.0025874027,0.00096667674],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037454257,0.0004700683,0.0003657324,0.003689726,0.02495738,0.013811651,0.0021551833,0.003266443,0.014678034],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006278601,0.00025963606,0.00036433138,0.0045355866,0.02331977,0.0026311358,0.0035127467,0.005829812,0.0010200562],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008689935,0.000019804957,0.0014326094,0.00005953151,0.000003213066,0.00028950642,0.0325508,0.00022807249,0.00016610629,0.8851403,0.047790665,0.032310724],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000036465708,0.000013998025,0.0038339212,0.00044931786,0.000013606846,0.00027898475,0.029255344,0.0004957861,0.00043896242,0.053912185,0.91125876,0.000045422945],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9442164,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98439896,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99673355,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11359673,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.15911339,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8242058},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4214813554","doi":"10.1007/978-3-030-83255-1_19","title":"Helping Students Resolve the Ambiguous Expectations of Academic Integrity","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Ethics and integrity in educational contexts","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"University of Guelph","keywords":"Syllabus; Academic integrity; Misconduct; Perspective (graphical); Point (geometry); Psychology; Space (punctuation); Mathematics education; Pedagogy; Medical education; Political science; Computer science; Social psychology; Medicine","score_opus":0.1031132474461447,"score_gpt":0.41897430282710096,"score_spread":0.31586105538095627,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4214813554","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.051315706,0.019455135,0.0077430205,0.16699858,0.0051379893,0.00014724328,0.00012845272,0.0005111546,0.74856263],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2634825,0.023089532,0.010619765,0.028192813,0.0012268091,0.00014430929,0.0001593088,0.00027326134,0.6728117],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990081,0.00039998768,0.000027631291,0.000055241006,0.00040811545,0.0001008776],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980198,0.00095729553,0.00013122676,0.00007957209,0.000428147,0.00038392944],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001471278,0.0002705924,0.00025458034,0.0005374131,0.0032946528,0.0053224675,0.00073761726,0.0015488177,0.014033028],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033856574,0.00014398088,0.00016294992,0.00045679093,0.002154559,0.0034105561,0.0025226094,0.003359558,0.0055735633],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012380342,0.00014029161,0.0024850178,0.0003068034,0.0000034888667,0.0004594745,0.034228552,0.00020402693,0.0010648011,0.063477494,0.6481469,0.24947077],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000026038026,0.000046536345,0.0019754327,0.00048273965,0.0000035824933,0.00047912548,0.025409134,0.00021707008,0.0008751763,0.016959935,0.95353633,0.000012270665],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004149143,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020762824,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9984512,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002324895,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0043762596,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.046945155},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4214821696","doi":"10.1007/978-3-030-83255-1_10","title":"Pay-To-Pass: Evolving Online Systems That Undermine the Integrity of Student Work","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Ethics and integrity in educational contexts","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"University of Guelph","keywords":"Cheating; Academic integrity; Context (archaeology); Work (physics); Reflection (computer programming); Public relations; Internet privacy; Psychology; Engineering ethics; Pedagogy; Medical education; Business; Political science; Sociology; Computer science; Engineering; Social psychology; Medicine","score_opus":0.13299595966255953,"score_gpt":0.4017826551306363,"score_spread":0.26878669546807676,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4214821696","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.30987933,0.0019430494,0.030440966,0.042179585,0.0005877604,0.00017006461,0.00011415377,0.0013425746,0.6133425],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9100259,0.000847556,0.0050659836,0.0022696392,0.000117553434,0.000046707606,0.00005888705,0.00031652403,0.08125108],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99191874,0.003001544,0.00014380958,0.00046090304,0.0031721815,0.0013028673],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9814249,0.0067311544,0.0012346765,0.0040210234,0.0034940655,0.0030941775],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007891708,0.0002448656,0.00028239487,0.0013329231,0.0120689105,0.021078907,0.0028593075,0.0030402348,0.008813433],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022166988,0.0002644856,0.00027584712,0.0017785897,0.01864901,0.010592314,0.008130318,0.003928738,0.002211078],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000659057,0.0001477331,0.009509977,0.00011854057,0.000013629233,0.0006780379,0.12264285,0.0010749882,0.0014648273,0.58434343,0.058834735,0.2211054],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001649487,0.000106951666,0.009138927,0.000507854,0.000020567704,0.0007183522,0.095121294,0.0047623394,0.0030197282,0.111742504,0.77476245,0.0000825229],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10226342,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16625604,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99695975,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017804122,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.022610994,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20333636},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4214822777","doi":"10.1007/978-3-030-83255-1_27","title":"Using Quality Assurance Frameworks to Support an Institutional Culture of Academic Integrity at Canadian Universities","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Ethics and integrity in educational contexts","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"The Scarborough Hospital; University of Waterloo; University of Toronto","funders":"University of Guelph","keywords":"Quality assurance; Academic integrity; Higher education; Curriculum; Quality (philosophy); Political science; Medical education; Public relations; Engineering ethics; Business; Medicine; Engineering; Marketing","score_opus":0.13813485640133136,"score_gpt":0.4290081473616715,"score_spread":0.2908732909603401,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4214822777","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17368631,0.008470643,0.14568192,0.27914613,0.002092055,0.0036780422,0.0012392214,0.002627305,0.3833784],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85298306,0.0030724462,0.10279089,0.009633267,0.00018802356,0.0008017149,0.00059246423,0.00040447328,0.02953366],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.87906724,0.04671425,0.006746292,0.005014786,0.04656607,0.01589151],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6882547,0.047517654,0.021410177,0.019935995,0.17758556,0.045295935],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.106256254,0.0006723951,0.00079631666,0.010734059,0.032054078,0.033216886,0.007150185,0.0032734927,0.004679283],"category_scores_gemma":[0.14160769,0.0010451917,0.0011963425,0.011303336,0.023915645,0.008626726,0.018760249,0.0063469275,0.00076921965],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012077209,0.00030564825,0.052410465,0.0016400212,0.00017729145,0.0008316657,0.13068235,0.006559297,0.0031005028,0.35742873,0.10755787,0.33918533],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007303133,0.00021482591,0.06525595,0.0040186546,0.0001295133,0.00027987148,0.10125704,0.0051526907,0.0029190308,0.057437215,0.76262313,0.00063913164],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9031647,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9295381,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9967265,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.28564864,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.5358373,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8285463},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4214827142","doi":"10.1007/978-3-030-83255-1_25","title":"Changing “Hearts” and Minds: Pedagogical and Institutional Practices to Foster Academic Integrity","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Ethics and integrity in educational contexts","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"University of Guelph","keywords":"Academic integrity; Misconduct; Conversation; Institution; Psychology; Best practice; Pedagogy; Medical education; Mathematics education; Sociology; Political science; Social psychology; Medicine","score_opus":0.2565904588668992,"score_gpt":0.45956043791431633,"score_spread":0.20296997904741715,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4214827142","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6169057,0.0045276796,0.041322418,0.1572069,0.0012892588,0.00054970244,0.000026171596,0.00083243585,0.1773398],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9781215,0.0006137466,0.008507804,0.0047619687,0.00007944126,0.00013759416,0.000009564929,0.00010677356,0.007661612],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.92060643,0.0650354,0.0011973773,0.0030113047,0.005531611,0.004617856],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9021396,0.04596314,0.008757096,0.010668408,0.009915201,0.022556627],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.043386467,0.00045862078,0.00058631535,0.002619934,0.039049707,0.020073092,0.0054027936,0.0044624424,0.0054493807],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0881162,0.0005762033,0.00048480355,0.0014235169,0.05044122,0.011207642,0.02858217,0.008894562,0.0012394193],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000437204,0.00025104635,0.008449358,0.00027370476,0.000018950108,0.00052915234,0.8476958,0.00020144976,0.0013738243,0.04677754,0.0092982035,0.08508727],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026392989,0.00014875246,0.0077989115,0.0010156931,0.00002917509,0.00045442648,0.77014726,0.0004097644,0.002143891,0.032704644,0.1850479,0.00007327276],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017074615,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.034228984,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9955376,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017432125,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.036025804,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22945237},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4214830794","doi":"10.1007/978-3-030-83255-1_29","title":"Building a Culture of Restorative Practice and Restorative Responses to Academic Misconduct","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Ethics and integrity in educational contexts","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"MacEwan University","funders":"University of Guelph","keywords":"Misconduct; Restorative justice; Political science; Public relations; Mandate; Action (physics); Pedagogy; Engineering ethics; Sociology; Psychology; Law; Engineering","score_opus":0.12023898933083796,"score_gpt":0.44876675849745173,"score_spread":0.32852776916661375,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4214830794","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.37825814,0.007068807,0.06498253,0.22735107,0.0018893101,0.00042227306,0.000055849046,0.0007151862,0.31925687],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94748235,0.0019612561,0.0150459735,0.01089443,0.00021705132,0.00024137784,0.000026923011,0.0001237698,0.02400684],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9670104,0.021091796,0.00075204606,0.0018443661,0.0064046844,0.0028968102],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9684049,0.010867745,0.0038059107,0.0037199988,0.005646075,0.007555334],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.034168843,0.0005195549,0.00062434206,0.0024377666,0.028076299,0.02012406,0.0049039624,0.004926228,0.004939956],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02034517,0.0004851637,0.0005767926,0.0016784254,0.057874758,0.009584181,0.024972847,0.011235911,0.0009307687],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015946212,0.000268742,0.0046781334,0.0002591634,0.000023656552,0.00037038012,0.54253155,0.00044045725,0.0011378048,0.34723872,0.027562106,0.07547335],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008246914,0.00011247954,0.005483512,0.0010241315,0.00002015897,0.00044645643,0.35339534,0.0006940971,0.0016892476,0.07979602,0.5572328,0.000097506825],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010180174,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.025018523,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9950738,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016779747,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.033419285,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18070424},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4214834164","doi":"10.1007/978-3-030-83255-1_31","title":"Conclusions and Future Directions for Academic Integrity in Canada","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Ethics and integrity in educational contexts","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Yorkville University; University of Calgary","funders":"University of Guelph","keywords":"Work (physics); Academic integrity; Engineering ethics; Key (lock); Research integrity; Political science; Sociology; Computer science; Engineering; Computer security; Mechanical engineering","score_opus":0.06226257731444186,"score_gpt":0.3676928290104588,"score_spread":0.30543025169601695,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4214834164","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0059768786,0.04388967,0.0018386858,0.47681293,0.009385025,0.00008922439,0.0007224299,0.00017757805,0.46110758],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.21216421,0.08515327,0.006534632,0.09870037,0.0024195544,0.00015022494,0.0010025647,0.000276874,0.59359825],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99329585,0.0010701139,0.00014091644,0.00044153692,0.0029664075,0.0020851467],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9889043,0.0016552611,0.0002462672,0.00024646506,0.0068487534,0.0020990148],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005154175,0.00052724243,0.00067064515,0.0024441842,0.018473355,0.020993643,0.0027323386,0.004895595,0.026571874],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012214666,0.00032139273,0.00055454305,0.005824699,0.010829752,0.005306728,0.0043344502,0.007650948,0.0020999778],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015822134,0.000011074023,0.00051542354,0.00021819005,0.00000643336,0.00015718697,0.0055017425,0.0003753541,0.00006326011,0.47350168,0.48602495,0.033608835],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000050142667,0.0000037053894,0.00093355373,0.0006764114,0.000008185757,0.0000398739,0.010053288,0.00020115636,0.000108188266,0.0275881,0.9603552,0.000027473414],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9619971,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97980094,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99510443,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.16812572,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.3075364,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96485627},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4214837025","doi":"10.1007/978-3-030-83255-1_6","title":"Accountability, Relationality and Indigenous Epistemology: Advancing an Indigenous Perspective on Academic Integrity","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Ethics and integrity in educational contexts","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"University of Guelph","keywords":"Indigenous; Accountability; Scholarship; Construct (python library); Sociology; Epistemology; Traditional knowledge; Environmental ethics; Engineering ethics; Political science; Law; Engineering; Ecology","score_opus":0.07291364800665245,"score_gpt":0.41997733075976673,"score_spread":0.3470636827531143,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4214837025","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19913208,0.014674936,0.10706064,0.1433269,0.0014099834,0.00019807763,0.0000477582,0.00020344724,0.53394616],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9763625,0.0036796015,0.009337413,0.002018796,0.0003046348,0.000069051275,0.000011951688,0.000067848734,0.00814826],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9767715,0.015859086,0.0005628966,0.001079616,0.0040499847,0.0016769368],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9601177,0.027135767,0.0028681096,0.002923069,0.0046145828,0.0023407445],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.031326514,0.00040732414,0.00082559214,0.0033681458,0.017889652,0.018319251,0.0028135949,0.004030508,0.0033834262],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02418974,0.00036787946,0.0005710443,0.0027614923,0.09222423,0.01876925,0.015925488,0.008846995,0.00040560856],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006868779,0.000019155077,0.0005003815,0.000108927255,0.000006285954,0.00019851122,0.20186071,0.00023255702,0.00014597944,0.78870356,0.0007776466,0.007439434],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000067404326,0.000046910744,0.0010518226,0.0009895023,0.000026623564,0.00035594866,0.18332736,0.0016706893,0.0006870073,0.68771577,0.12407392,0.000047710048],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.028324092,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.026167931,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9959695,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016278714,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.026034726,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16567242},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4214838171","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0255334","title":"Do individual and institutional predictors of misconduct vary by country? Results of a matched-control analysis of problematic image duplications","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PLoS ONE","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Incentive; Misconduct; Null hypothesis; Scientific misconduct; Demographic economics; Psychology; Actuarial science; Accounting; Political science; Business; Medicine; Economics; Econometrics; Pathology; Law","score_opus":0.03247367824630493,"score_gpt":0.26200760457624367,"score_spread":0.22953392632993874,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4214838171","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99304354,0.0024894984,0.0011606,0.00030672862,0.00008655565,0.00009572125,0.0011511499,0.000018639596,0.0016476004],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988789,0.00018743127,0.00023282105,0.00008289711,0.000024806573,0.000072882,0.00028954053,0.000011612523,0.00021911808],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98039836,0.009565026,0.0027038392,0.0038415692,0.0016877236,0.0018034029],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8903499,0.05322814,0.036726553,0.011302974,0.0054726517,0.0029198357],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013288891,0.00051259616,0.0014537256,0.0037404045,0.0009968142,0.002398696,0.0012136891,0.0013022405,0.0042773373],"category_scores_gemma":[0.056165185,0.0003653402,0.002551785,0.0047751744,0.0022807862,0.0016242447,0.001847827,0.0013391401,0.00051636726],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0014404999,0.00017540899,0.9878913,0.0003789331,0.0026179643,0.00038595241,0.001185471,0.00020722287,0.0002923211,0.00048065523,0.0004251775,0.00451923],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000054780226,0.0003799384,0.9939381,0.00012935212,0.0015004559,0.0003677467,0.0014063716,0.00036074047,0.00025398936,0.000513184,0.0010746267,0.000020767575],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037428397,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020526638,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99869776,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00054654106,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009131892,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07027918},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4214842249","doi":"10.1007/978-3-030-83255-1_14","title":"Visual Plagiarism: Seeing the Forest and the Trees","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Ethics and integrity in educational contexts","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"University of Guelph","keywords":"Meaning (existential); Best practice; Subject (documents); Engineering ethics; Pedagogy; Academic integrity; Articulation (sociology); Psychology; Political science; Computer science; Library science; Engineering","score_opus":0.05084612122508893,"score_gpt":0.361860372587135,"score_spread":0.3110142513620461,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4214842249","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009778419,0.041812573,0.017723989,0.03310313,0.003999098,0.000082348815,0.00016593437,0.0005344166,0.89280015],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.11838549,0.027842157,0.007760444,0.007808919,0.0013655951,0.00006590554,0.00016508746,0.0004494723,0.8361569],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.999549,0.0001693829,0.000011871084,0.000050149483,0.00018123239,0.000038325663],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984995,0.0009687284,0.00007541878,0.000077097,0.0002708307,0.00010843446],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00067905936,0.00043328194,0.00021294094,0.001230687,0.0038702183,0.0055338214,0.00064083684,0.0016887415,0.019222789],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019086346,0.00017921207,0.0002435956,0.0010778846,0.0047133584,0.0048724664,0.0018052796,0.003252864,0.0050812857],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024184697,0.000030867926,0.00060258573,0.00048020383,0.000005600539,0.0005543961,0.031346273,0.00043748022,0.0010351419,0.34855118,0.46902007,0.14791198],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000021287606,0.000014548784,0.0004719962,0.0006303398,0.0000028488926,0.00085407344,0.005595646,0.00027349524,0.0005565767,0.031145552,0.96044165,0.000011150451],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007404675,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020744247,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9983113,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029770986,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020310548,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06430668},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4214843768","doi":"10.1007/978-3-030-83255-1_26","title":"Promotion of Academic Integrity Through a Marketing Lens for Canadian Post-secondary Institutions","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Ethics and integrity in educational contexts","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"NorQuest College; Northern Alberta Institute of Technology","funders":"University of Guelph","keywords":"Misconduct; Academic integrity; Promotion (chess); Public relations; Political science; Psychology; Engineering ethics; Engineering; Social psychology","score_opus":0.14616944464781023,"score_gpt":0.39795638328894756,"score_spread":0.2517869386411373,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4214843768","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16687663,0.0041363537,0.0017062671,0.042574808,0.00053081824,0.00015471871,0.0001665946,0.0001585035,0.7836952],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.76447886,0.0029955108,0.0020357831,0.0017797935,0.00013605204,0.00003311148,0.00004670202,0.00006234521,0.22843187],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99803156,0.00041739517,0.000028872535,0.00010326221,0.0008793853,0.0005395059],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9944904,0.0010393591,0.00039871156,0.0001614876,0.0018140987,0.0020959773],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027817728,0.00033651158,0.0002241777,0.0025030035,0.019723216,0.012904604,0.0013187942,0.001801738,0.017013604],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003851567,0.00018018977,0.00022301242,0.0033206202,0.008067076,0.0025307694,0.0033281439,0.002831501,0.0011808566],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000067261615,0.00028055327,0.016631423,0.0002973111,0.000008680446,0.0012070424,0.19974712,0.00033483928,0.002329837,0.39040098,0.11943571,0.26925933],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005238015,0.000051313193,0.021500658,0.0003409412,0.0000070484257,0.00035957975,0.071754485,0.00031992304,0.0014985335,0.008302822,0.89581734,0.000042186224],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7318311,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9062329,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9981983,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.072240606,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09336912,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5394964},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4214845475","doi":"10.1007/978-3-030-83255-1_5","title":"Re-Defining Academic Integrity: Embracing Indigenous Truths","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Ethics and integrity in educational contexts","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":42,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"University of Guelph","keywords":"Indigenous; Scholarship; Academic integrity; Environmental ethics; Inclusion (mineral); Sociology; Political science; Epistemology; Engineering ethics; Social science; Law","score_opus":0.08544769144227128,"score_gpt":0.3843177378485613,"score_spread":0.29887004640629006,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4214845475","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10130885,0.018459456,0.031916056,0.37241617,0.0027096414,0.00010839919,0.00007954605,0.00018164523,0.4728201],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96517897,0.0042216685,0.0050778813,0.010096685,0.00034005495,0.000025334657,0.000019933836,0.00007215328,0.014967234],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97709787,0.012317472,0.00059901655,0.0011085528,0.005577326,0.0032996284],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.967094,0.015937202,0.001840807,0.0028197258,0.0083983075,0.0039100815],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0223849,0.00046171763,0.00073402806,0.002592012,0.038464215,0.03249641,0.003450812,0.0061208108,0.0039305114],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025217846,0.00028964787,0.00044890554,0.0027367275,0.12747444,0.013028483,0.015022556,0.011816416,0.0006015472],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009997008,0.000012129997,0.00063325075,0.00009945474,0.0000059429535,0.00029886558,0.24747781,0.00021142316,0.00021330257,0.73230743,0.0068551325,0.011875224],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000057337643,0.0000237289,0.0012614704,0.0012299654,0.000026027292,0.0004357652,0.28806028,0.00062908255,0.0009636788,0.32839254,0.3788987,0.00007312146],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.42655542,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.52870625,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9938792,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.054648623,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09028428,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8481452},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4214846582","doi":"10.1007/978-3-030-83255-1_17","title":"The Distinctive Nature of Academic Integrity in Graduate Legal Education","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Ethics and integrity in educational contexts","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"University of Guelph","keywords":"Tribunal; Misconduct; Legal education; Scholarship; Academic integrity; Law; Political science; Legal profession; Legal psychology; Diversity (politics); Legal practice; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.07079246807210665,"score_gpt":0.3973739032523009,"score_spread":0.3265814351801942,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4214846582","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.053860214,0.016812054,0.0018568977,0.059974056,0.00082210405,0.000041027713,0.00008472667,0.00006949341,0.8664795],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7823889,0.010563438,0.0012607995,0.0066152266,0.00057350553,0.00002536752,0.000089507674,0.000058876165,0.19842441],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99756193,0.00038477793,0.00003738628,0.00011053907,0.0012727437,0.0006326612],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99610955,0.000883274,0.00024706312,0.00012822062,0.001412836,0.0012190017],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014117432,0.00017640907,0.0002461859,0.0018962829,0.008420014,0.008857187,0.00087705284,0.0014573317,0.006095568],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00398388,0.0001380241,0.00019344025,0.00256688,0.017484333,0.0022105502,0.0035378677,0.0036333103,0.00069295923],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013116349,0.00004879035,0.005060482,0.0001659102,0.000004065701,0.0003188398,0.033929348,0.00032606765,0.00039105953,0.76355135,0.07504514,0.12114583],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000035661994,0.000029240227,0.020770378,0.0007703498,0.000008076461,0.00042575877,0.033800248,0.0003222549,0.00063963776,0.074723125,0.86847305,0.000034276432],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4303024,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7176238,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99854267,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.029888503,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.047596194,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8555955},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4214850383","doi":"10.1007/978-3-030-83255-1_8","title":"Contract Cheating in Canada: A Comprehensive Overview","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Ethics and integrity in educational contexts","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"University of Guelph","keywords":"Cheating; Commonwealth; Action (physics); Legislation; Political science; Certification; Law; Mill; Call to action; Criminology; Law and economics; Business; Sociology; Psychology; Social psychology; Engineering; Marketing","score_opus":0.11256557260371701,"score_gpt":0.3736821056026217,"score_spread":0.2611165329989047,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4214850383","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005686655,0.7526159,0.00082687417,0.021723894,0.0013000445,0.00010062798,0.0021608463,0.00013845574,0.21544671],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.048417296,0.90424573,0.0014992874,0.004420059,0.0006493677,0.000063492516,0.0012686532,0.00011961636,0.0393165],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99676704,0.00021460035,0.00012415591,0.00021770643,0.0020531004,0.0006233246],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99364674,0.0011725327,0.00040227838,0.00012583288,0.0037542752,0.000898313],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019283291,0.00091385713,0.00080201245,0.016321836,0.008997686,0.008781209,0.0021011732,0.0023549632,0.016204506],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005177087,0.000652194,0.00059693697,0.03247853,0.0048738956,0.0027314865,0.002285048,0.0026327881,0.001711186],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035351375,0.000089683555,0.006669762,0.0039624,0.000035431705,0.0005802661,0.0050686947,0.00084383757,0.00015498324,0.09909889,0.39476648,0.48869425],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000028929533,0.000009349279,0.008829592,0.002736701,0.00001679729,0.00022022348,0.0013439,0.00015633737,0.000076036034,0.0021917068,0.98438036,0.000036129568],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9832304,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9889417,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9980717,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1351722,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.24983272,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9807476},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4214866823","doi":"10.1007/978-3-030-83255-1_11","title":"Education as a Financial Transaction: Contract Employment and Contract Cheating","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Ethics and integrity in educational contexts","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Bow Valley College","funders":"University of Guelph","keywords":"Cheating; Misconduct; Earnings; Certification; Business; Political science; Finance; Law; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.04943231099942771,"score_gpt":0.36740672311410927,"score_spread":0.3179744121146816,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4214866823","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.49368805,0.006765316,0.009026599,0.15514292,0.00044994353,0.00019395462,0.00030475494,0.00005206523,0.33437636],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9872499,0.0011790146,0.00037599157,0.0044478932,0.0001326836,0.000033469118,0.000041504612,0.000013822651,0.006525836],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9865975,0.005373788,0.0005747633,0.00078763376,0.0035292897,0.0031371182],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9239414,0.035996962,0.021230245,0.0030071195,0.00780646,0.008017808],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012506154,0.000252326,0.0004060928,0.0020435017,0.012589654,0.015102891,0.0016091021,0.005657317,0.022500368],"category_scores_gemma":[0.045815937,0.0003102453,0.0004335226,0.0030654927,0.01483813,0.0117841605,0.007736278,0.007852389,0.0011025476],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013696052,0.0005894409,0.16079026,0.00026685485,0.000048657243,0.002645494,0.07424723,0.00097515195,0.00015312704,0.63389766,0.03529915,0.09095002],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000093625764,0.00016736663,0.10024935,0.0032867463,0.00011946105,0.0022890063,0.25483403,0.0076520704,0.0003853364,0.4067285,0.22395414,0.0002403673],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06159808,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07731738,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06159808,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017430156,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.021892227,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1264652},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4214870346","doi":"10.1007/978-3-030-83255-1_20","title":"How to Talk About Academic Integrity so Students Will Listen:  Addressing Ethical Decision-Making Using Scenarios","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Ethics and integrity in educational contexts","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"University of Guelph","keywords":"Academic integrity; Misconduct; Situational ethics; Psychology; Engineering ethics; Curriculum; Best practice; Learning development; Institution; Medical education; Ethical decision; Higher education; Public relations; Pedagogy; Political science; Social psychology; Engineering; Medicine","score_opus":0.121834342075656,"score_gpt":0.4461875351949863,"score_spread":0.3243531931193303,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4214870346","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19754942,0.0028684456,0.21827261,0.06735483,0.0019942438,0.0013521141,0.000245506,0.0011478396,0.50921506],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.78376883,0.0044407696,0.10588582,0.007566123,0.00031376767,0.0010838978,0.00032459118,0.00032486586,0.096291356],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9896528,0.008569322,0.00017067941,0.0003060985,0.0008081817,0.0004929385],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98429793,0.012515947,0.0005563269,0.00048243153,0.0007606676,0.0013866883],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008153861,0.001217307,0.000473575,0.0008239461,0.0058328863,0.010811302,0.0032808462,0.0059018433,0.014723709],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015161356,0.00042817334,0.00074024,0.00060082466,0.010392163,0.010961015,0.008133014,0.009016836,0.0032842846],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000057324174,0.00050304446,0.00225805,0.0006379353,0.000017571141,0.0029088252,0.48941344,0.0049168672,0.0028405145,0.34690893,0.06531225,0.08422528],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028172994,0.00020359035,0.00078636163,0.0013890582,0.000013056344,0.0017047086,0.254157,0.0064037316,0.0021977841,0.12849878,0.60452133,0.000096397904],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012421393,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030328094,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9940982,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032223894,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034522633,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04925573},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4214871240","doi":"10.1007/978-3-030-83255-1_3","title":"Student Integrity Violations in the Academy: More Than a Decade of Growing Complexity and Concern","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Ethics and integrity in educational contexts","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary; Yorkville University","funders":"University of Guelph","keywords":"Cheating; Academic integrity; Misconduct; Action (physics); Political science; Public relations; Call to action; Scientific misconduct; Psychology; Criminology; Law; Medicine; Business; Social psychology; Advertising","score_opus":0.1778949678718948,"score_gpt":0.4382057790307369,"score_spread":0.2603108111588421,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4214871240","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01333088,0.8386132,0.0005125931,0.13783742,0.0022741363,0.000019241726,0.00016449086,0.00004322569,0.007204735],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.108489156,0.8523788,0.0009109771,0.033093423,0.0026295467,0.00003467739,0.00016899775,0.000059371276,0.0022351688],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9739769,0.0068357987,0.0021809628,0.002063017,0.01336141,0.0015819557],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.84956723,0.09142897,0.011122947,0.0034559036,0.03797708,0.006447851],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022876855,0.0005102295,0.0016494085,0.0071357447,0.00632634,0.019812716,0.0021540986,0.006224934,0.0029944757],"category_scores_gemma":[0.052381568,0.0007841618,0.0008034762,0.013204387,0.016181739,0.011515301,0.00567054,0.008234602,0.0004802093],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008309698,0.00008082004,0.012968435,0.011082303,0.00015067094,0.0010049363,0.08737789,0.00053356343,0.00047144722,0.037401546,0.10671269,0.7421326],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007536873,0.00008808753,0.017498108,0.019763045,0.000076800985,0.0010337428,0.076139435,0.0002073591,0.00037480338,0.009844346,0.8748294,0.00013720088],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.18381792,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.25420135,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99377507,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.032136448,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05600263,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36549598},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4214875419","doi":"10.1007/978-3-030-83255-1_23","title":"Beyond the Traditional: Academic Integrity in Canadian Librarianship","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Ethics and integrity in educational contexts","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"University of Guelph","keywords":"Academic integrity; Conversation; Scholarship; Information literacy; Political science; Sociology; Literacy; Public relations; Pedagogy; Library science; Computer science","score_opus":0.13639318446636928,"score_gpt":0.36131848075386874,"score_spread":0.22492529628749947,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4214875419","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14964168,0.01989104,0.0044572097,0.29820135,0.0015364445,0.00013367608,0.00025273894,0.00028566227,0.52560014],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9331535,0.0051725428,0.0022767242,0.01597501,0.00021371298,0.000029992003,0.00008432396,0.00009672797,0.04299741],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9715881,0.006736241,0.000940329,0.0016914513,0.01294683,0.006096979],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94926167,0.010192198,0.002704496,0.0020485567,0.023036432,0.012756581],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013157424,0.00035164016,0.00062379154,0.005473657,0.07512029,0.03478052,0.0040247864,0.0058784178,0.012008901],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027812049,0.00057912356,0.00059559866,0.010603789,0.047012135,0.012155086,0.016652424,0.009353261,0.0010984333],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000080204525,0.00009556258,0.010826884,0.00058092596,0.000030044246,0.0011623735,0.37038717,0.0004262044,0.00060032646,0.41452408,0.07635654,0.12492969],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013358546,0.000038452345,0.013653044,0.0007650755,0.000033361364,0.00043104257,0.21447225,0.0003394254,0.0007146082,0.026151273,0.7432398,0.000148324],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9675931,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.979158,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9941216,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.22356744,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.350787,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.90055174},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4214876806","doi":"10.1007/978-3-030-83255-1_12","title":"Academic Integrity in Work-Integrated Learning (WIL) Settings","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Ethics and integrity in educational contexts","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Humber Polytechnic","funders":"University of Guelph","keywords":"Professionalization; Service-learning; Public relations; Experiential learning; Work (physics); Promotion (chess); Professional development; Political science; Service (business); Pedagogy; Medical education; Psychology; Engineering ethics; Business; Medicine; Engineering; Marketing","score_opus":0.06875605823475357,"score_gpt":0.3698491167901975,"score_spread":0.30109305855544394,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4214876806","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0244597,0.009841689,0.0046716263,0.015759692,0.001438152,0.00009474042,0.00003397277,0.00015154544,0.94354886],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.41489995,0.009568143,0.0032837808,0.005218554,0.0008087654,0.00013056012,0.00007183817,0.00015231917,0.5658662],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983552,0.00082596816,0.000045093468,0.00010490906,0.00039516558,0.000273653],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99820054,0.0007617521,0.0001538169,0.00014930867,0.0002847573,0.0004497978],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014769187,0.00030420613,0.00024136738,0.00058346253,0.005717194,0.007913276,0.0011125279,0.0014465282,0.017620716],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023010755,0.00013447105,0.00021643155,0.0006479301,0.007369599,0.004134612,0.006130423,0.0038279623,0.0038036394],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026187907,0.00025278403,0.0012111643,0.00046164534,0.0000046380896,0.00079798105,0.08116644,0.0003824635,0.000612812,0.55751675,0.1580268,0.19954029],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003659774,0.000081699545,0.0014895211,0.0007663205,0.0000030106687,0.0006650686,0.02590428,0.00018861031,0.0005890018,0.042951398,0.92734313,0.000014371128],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015854699,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0038054069,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99855345,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032550846,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0040343455,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.058947146},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4214888682","doi":"10.1007/978-3-030-83255-1_22","title":"Supporting Academic Integrity in the Writing Centre: Perspectives of Student Consultants","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Ethics and integrity in educational contexts","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"University of Guelph","keywords":"Academic integrity; Directive; Misconduct; Psychology; Medical education; Intermediary; Pedagogy; Public relations; Political science; Medicine; Social psychology; Business; Computer science","score_opus":0.09028271303738428,"score_gpt":0.4343924560442997,"score_spread":0.34410974300691544,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4214888682","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.81991553,0.004599304,0.0048770374,0.08301745,0.0009914304,0.000092918504,0.00005607817,0.00016074488,0.08628957],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9741542,0.0021258597,0.0012364851,0.0056762975,0.00020105441,0.000045048782,0.000017625616,0.00006932812,0.016474241],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9671745,0.026556166,0.00041565706,0.0004982175,0.0031105606,0.0022448672],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9606787,0.023782624,0.0028499886,0.0008162544,0.004247978,0.0076244525],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011713096,0.00043426748,0.0005636678,0.0010514787,0.021423446,0.015554605,0.0022215575,0.0042275004,0.004672575],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03092533,0.0004226303,0.000270795,0.0017435671,0.013010788,0.006240369,0.008007429,0.008024688,0.0011255033],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023840577,0.00007495339,0.0024362677,0.000101716934,0.0000041181415,0.0018774264,0.96019477,0.00009487111,0.000768182,0.008953623,0.012186481,0.0132837845],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000030378296,0.000056981065,0.0004928209,0.00015700841,0.0000036519093,0.0012811441,0.91870016,0.00014552374,0.00032372394,0.0009818223,0.07783235,0.000021861946],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006039991,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012188597,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9957725,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005840218,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010612298,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.061945558},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4214891838","doi":"10.1007/978-3-030-83255-1","title":"Academic Integrity in Canada","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Ethics and integrity in educational contexts","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":81,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Guelph","keywords":"Academic integrity; Political science; Computer science; Library science","score_opus":0.07046766004351139,"score_gpt":0.3730977673708292,"score_spread":0.3026301073273178,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4214891838","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.003896141,0.018731566,0.00048464054,0.06152551,0.003318707,0.00004410609,0.0003301405,0.0001500555,0.91151905],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.055714224,0.014151548,0.0007963799,0.00911246,0.00039496183,0.000025555539,0.0002189788,0.00013230232,0.91945356],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99536395,0.0002809793,0.000069477515,0.00023054435,0.0028349245,0.0012200214],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99636686,0.0003323722,0.000083053594,0.00012141651,0.0021692074,0.00092716055],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013602173,0.0005458125,0.0004883552,0.0021498266,0.033468302,0.015036399,0.001803435,0.0038616445,0.037250586],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004672322,0.00041913177,0.0004473398,0.0060537276,0.007710711,0.003200409,0.0043864935,0.0039335554,0.005904606],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009770362,0.0000114448685,0.00041370085,0.00010941896,0.0000033515137,0.0002668978,0.004635435,0.00019251999,0.000110405,0.22150825,0.72485805,0.047880758],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000012156432,0.000002137145,0.00035695208,0.00006484006,0.0000017787357,0.000058261157,0.00147839,0.000048486047,0.00004293418,0.0024634579,0.99547195,0.0000096437925],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9792143,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99228984,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99613833,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.12424007,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.25803313,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.901429},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4214892342","doi":"10.1007/978-3-030-83255-1_13","title":"Canadian Open Digital Distance Education Universities and Academic Integrity","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Ethics and integrity in educational contexts","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Athabasca University","funders":"University of Guelph","keywords":"Academic integrity; Misconduct; Context (archaeology); Promotion (chess); Distance education; Academic community; Higher education; Public relations; Political science; Phenomenon; Discipline; Work (physics); Engineering ethics; Sociology; Pedagogy; Engineering; Social science; Geography","score_opus":0.06635372075701519,"score_gpt":0.3713343140080847,"score_spread":0.3049805932510695,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4214892342","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0047197673,0.014562064,0.0007012191,0.01997408,0.00083824503,0.000023772345,0.00010975556,0.00004804331,0.95902306],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.25592226,0.025336139,0.0016752295,0.0051673707,0.00037557655,0.00004012983,0.00015131616,0.00010073275,0.71123123],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980082,0.00025124973,0.000028825254,0.00013923923,0.0011447283,0.00042774738],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980124,0.00044772014,0.00010520823,0.0000973652,0.0008254755,0.0005118945],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00096178264,0.00036779672,0.00025248024,0.002013998,0.01700678,0.01041909,0.0011083331,0.0023540133,0.025126308],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030809916,0.00023336093,0.00021434035,0.004346402,0.011691367,0.0034374488,0.004382085,0.0030582875,0.002036798],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005536128,0.000010858353,0.00039898383,0.000113883965,0.0000013882118,0.0001651,0.010839849,0.00014006364,0.000072740324,0.81161416,0.13659991,0.040037487],"study_design_scores_gemma":[8.9310225e-7,0.0000031989566,0.0005867026,0.00017289317,0.0000017896259,0.000084481704,0.00439381,0.00008776886,0.00010020097,0.01784731,0.9767115,0.000009360395],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8307799,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9250526,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.997646,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.076596074,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07550557,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.555746},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4214895577","doi":"10.1007/978-3-030-83255-1_1","title":"Academic Integrity in Canada: Historical Perspectives and Current Trends","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Ethics and integrity in educational contexts","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":22,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Yorkville University; University of Calgary","funders":"University of Guelph","keywords":"Academic integrity; Scholarship; Cheating; Misconduct; Political science; Corporate governance; Honour; Action (physics); Public relations; Public administration; Engineering ethics; Law; Management; Psychology; Engineering; Social psychology","score_opus":0.08941566069451737,"score_gpt":0.37544233161127843,"score_spread":0.28602667091676104,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4214895577","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.034694325,0.3223288,0.0013714894,0.2257578,0.0025027022,0.000051660783,0.0016904536,0.00017495546,0.41142783],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.57713616,0.3260108,0.0021601466,0.017756846,0.00134522,0.000047440513,0.00094372156,0.00019184424,0.074407876],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99225134,0.00082489866,0.00021074139,0.00060694123,0.004195308,0.0019106672],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98233485,0.0029898009,0.0009569739,0.0003058372,0.010575651,0.0028369671],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004789686,0.0003985051,0.00054175104,0.008535502,0.0229588,0.018650278,0.0031394584,0.0030391656,0.010249884],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010350324,0.00042847937,0.00034057559,0.026199684,0.017040724,0.0044546435,0.0039622644,0.0056113084,0.00085460284],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000047355607,0.000055216093,0.008526758,0.0014167244,0.000023493349,0.0007919654,0.032900617,0.00089889456,0.00023387872,0.55883867,0.19232006,0.20394628],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000022708878,0.000009969453,0.009261265,0.0012332741,0.000009779088,0.00020020669,0.014088699,0.00024508464,0.00018007633,0.0066344314,0.9680829,0.000052084975],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9879319,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99013245,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9969608,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.27973932,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2988314,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8354003},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4214917970","doi":"10.1007/978-3-030-83255-1_21","title":"Revisioning Paraphrasing Instruction","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Ethics and integrity in educational contexts","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Mount Royal University","funders":"University of Guelph","keywords":"Rhetorical question; Discipline; Bespoke; Agency (philosophy); Academic writing; Professional writing; Pedagogy; Psychology; Intertextuality; Quality (philosophy); Mathematics education; Sociology; Linguistics; Political science; Epistemology","score_opus":0.08024849025524591,"score_gpt":0.38331016881500385,"score_spread":0.30306167855975796,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4214917970","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05824392,0.009119178,0.055088922,0.00390984,0.0013438377,0.00034549524,0.00012839993,0.001419142,0.8704014],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.37560222,0.008281624,0.04693959,0.0014900294,0.0004273912,0.00014268476,0.00027653476,0.00047726042,0.5663627],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990814,0.00027831952,0.000040105064,0.00007511629,0.00047600627,0.00004898307],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963999,0.0019061542,0.00013827966,0.0003872912,0.0010627483,0.00010571638],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008410881,0.00035268348,0.00019899709,0.00089318055,0.000785481,0.0015537351,0.0009987758,0.00053135515,0.009591969],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003896249,0.00009799646,0.00018711768,0.00059859775,0.0013089615,0.0011581326,0.0008726723,0.0014777292,0.0027462884],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000040184037,0.0001423245,0.0008549395,0.0005209029,0.0000038588837,0.00045911243,0.011036457,0.0010767326,0.008784907,0.04109652,0.049562108,0.88642174],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012106951,0.00022152874,0.0037144592,0.00097495806,0.000012546568,0.0017619921,0.00361472,0.002705399,0.01423137,0.020482756,0.9522348,0.00003339586],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034050727,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008020059,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9994686,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014826603,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017634269,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03208834},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4214927448","doi":"10.1007/978-3-030-83255-1_16","title":"Teaching the Teachers: To What Extent Do Pre-service Teachers Cheat on Exams and Plagiarise in Their Written Work?","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Ethics and integrity in educational contexts","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval; Université du Québec en Outaouais","funders":"University of Guelph","keywords":"Cheating; Commit; Psychology; Misconduct; Mathematics education; Work (physics); Perception; Academic dishonesty; Pedagogy; Social psychology; Computer science; Political science; Engineering","score_opus":0.06470223042909874,"score_gpt":0.3542426071313258,"score_spread":0.2895403767022271,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4214927448","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99270767,0.0009226625,0.00016191223,0.0021612016,0.000037307313,0.000030120409,0.00006491815,0.000013154742,0.003901106],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99609286,0.00067392545,0.00011025057,0.00069351814,0.000020211852,0.000026104646,0.00006132864,0.000007865097,0.002313967],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9922037,0.0025077935,0.00048136135,0.0006433825,0.0031043466,0.0010593985],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9421651,0.014875608,0.024706932,0.0019605854,0.009536641,0.0067551658],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006786296,0.00021613357,0.0004897892,0.0015388239,0.0037706192,0.0047584097,0.0012124429,0.0014644181,0.0041078296],"category_scores_gemma":[0.042305663,0.00043622026,0.00030630032,0.0012449826,0.003589645,0.0022634345,0.0015855205,0.0024400672,0.000976756],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011993878,0.00038122063,0.71513695,0.00029093082,0.000055954282,0.00042774813,0.22512801,0.00005292389,0.0008095247,0.00032268156,0.0047723893,0.05250171],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018670235,0.00016656479,0.66093093,0.00058819953,0.00003982767,0.0003749336,0.32566613,0.00014137477,0.000456689,0.0002421111,0.011334915,0.000039683448],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13398919,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.26703465,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9985356,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008649099,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0076273573,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26641858},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4214928957","doi":"10.1007/978-3-030-83255-1_4","title":"Academic Misconduct in Higher Education: Beyond Student Cheating","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Ethics and integrity in educational contexts","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary; Yorkville University","funders":"University of Guelph","keywords":"Misconduct; Cheating; Academic integrity; Scientific misconduct; Interpersonal communication; Public relations; Political science; Higher education; Psychology; Social psychology; Law; Medicine","score_opus":0.13467602167087375,"score_gpt":0.42091486062546424,"score_spread":0.28623883895459046,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4214928957","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012707638,0.08270702,0.0095438715,0.17821208,0.0049696052,0.000075702956,0.000113804876,0.00014992703,0.71152043],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.51648706,0.06830786,0.005372787,0.04513803,0.0039981348,0.00011657609,0.00011375404,0.00023333804,0.36023247],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9901308,0.004080956,0.00022522881,0.00047748102,0.004178367,0.00090720825],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9796658,0.011179915,0.0009084267,0.0012889946,0.0057001663,0.0012566164],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0070533953,0.00038646848,0.00048271075,0.00220509,0.010366684,0.0135928625,0.0019546417,0.0045530717,0.006712817],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013276011,0.00020095607,0.00035637608,0.0035169187,0.0265343,0.0067435717,0.0038959344,0.0073839985,0.0012433769],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000807762,0.00001888754,0.0009310779,0.00023800964,0.0000046135283,0.00024122093,0.027078306,0.00026851997,0.000096696785,0.7649274,0.13269347,0.07349383],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002395768,0.000012337492,0.0011553954,0.0012375279,0.000006597829,0.000237465,0.008410146,0.000271229,0.00029806266,0.08532368,0.9030201,0.0000250995],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.17821662,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.26151243,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9954469,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.032659873,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.040035333,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3543586},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4214932193","doi":"10.1007/978-3-030-83255-1_18","title":"Student Insight on Academic Integrity","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Ethics and integrity in educational contexts","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"University of Guelph","keywords":"Academic integrity; Psychology; Research integrity; Focus group; Mathematics education; Pedagogy; Medical education; Engineering ethics; Social psychology; Sociology; Engineering; Medicine","score_opus":0.10759004230911029,"score_gpt":0.4147945012617166,"score_spread":0.3072044589526063,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4214932193","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.36767116,0.0064217164,0.006702986,0.11499647,0.0015643631,0.00008622791,0.00033554333,0.00040779827,0.5018137],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8767027,0.0027908115,0.00096975797,0.00796929,0.00030676686,0.000027280934,0.00007497483,0.00007462579,0.111083835],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9950511,0.0021593308,0.00011678699,0.00020705737,0.0018045154,0.00066109846],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9910772,0.0049151042,0.00073645497,0.0005200172,0.0016701051,0.0010811455],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003559536,0.00035689527,0.0003219877,0.0013788254,0.0065913824,0.007448292,0.0014035052,0.0019007627,0.009407149],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0112589635,0.00016323714,0.00023078028,0.0014135486,0.007806203,0.0040223217,0.005013071,0.0049897498,0.0017525601],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000044006887,0.0001021358,0.008448646,0.00020906841,0.000007527851,0.0012291125,0.653908,0.00021671798,0.0023008175,0.10711021,0.11577765,0.110646114],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000049142755,0.00007342952,0.006141498,0.00034512894,0.000009771824,0.001264948,0.2818196,0.00037645278,0.0014797967,0.010494151,0.69795114,0.00003909908],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019398225,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03369938,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9980992,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0092114415,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00673273,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06683397},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4214937122","doi":"10.1007/978-3-030-83255-1_9","title":"Ethics, EdTech, and the Rise of Contract Cheating","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Ethics and integrity in educational contexts","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Thompson Rivers University","funders":"University of Guelph","keywords":"Cheating; Academic integrity; Situated; Academic dishonesty; Profit (economics); Public relations; Sociology; Pedagogy; Mathematics education; Engineering ethics; Political science; Psychology; Computer science; Social psychology; Engineering; Economics; Artificial intelligence; Microeconomics","score_opus":0.07108209043315897,"score_gpt":0.3788665979232876,"score_spread":0.30778450749012864,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4214937122","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009518094,0.023416756,0.0077741053,0.037703384,0.0014490216,0.000024552286,0.000034211946,0.000082837425,0.919997],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3619612,0.022158708,0.0038308646,0.013356159,0.0012892028,0.000091060756,0.000072561765,0.0002278461,0.5970124],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99784696,0.0010698306,0.000047238176,0.00016626695,0.0007006311,0.00016907786],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99666494,0.0021186257,0.00017764623,0.00028228454,0.00049282686,0.00026362698],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023144237,0.00031009183,0.00025262157,0.0010321592,0.004998759,0.007231408,0.0006715063,0.0022568088,0.013649965],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0037001623,0.00020083174,0.00021252898,0.0010607863,0.013922881,0.006257155,0.0039089336,0.00595439,0.0022158963],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000045097886,0.000012481874,0.00015893504,0.00003841745,0.0000012409525,0.00008452682,0.00706876,0.00010137628,0.000050437367,0.9436523,0.031349685,0.01747741],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000026919315,0.000011370046,0.000330326,0.00046805848,0.0000021225728,0.00030758162,0.004246914,0.0002643383,0.00027207582,0.23537423,0.7587095,0.000010792111],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029176972,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004209949,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9977432,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0054148296,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003101911,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.045663714},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4214938780","doi":"10.1007/978-3-030-83255-1_24","title":"The Barriers to Faculty Reporting Incidences of Academic Misconduct at Community Colleges","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Ethics and integrity in educational contexts","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Lethbridge College","funders":"University of Guelph","keywords":"Academic integrity; Misconduct; Academic dishonesty; Scholarship; Context (archaeology); Academic community; Public relations; Medical education; Higher education; Political science; Workload; Institution; Discipline; Psychology; Pedagogy; Sociology; Medicine; Management; Social psychology; Social science; Law","score_opus":0.18637917792642728,"score_gpt":0.43844919617184686,"score_spread":0.2520700182454196,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4214938780","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98516256,0.0003527869,0.0006089377,0.006495642,0.00006672901,0.00015924533,0.00010289694,0.00004502855,0.0070062536],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99829227,0.0001880852,0.00030708473,0.0004649678,0.000016604232,0.0000353613,0.000021930362,0.00000851516,0.00066511496],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.95639384,0.014371684,0.0039319275,0.002190294,0.014430837,0.00868138],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.70632046,0.09629878,0.062492326,0.009746356,0.062409062,0.06273304],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022958443,0.00023768649,0.0005181138,0.0027607817,0.014019121,0.008327619,0.0039711455,0.0014605013,0.008164106],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1877052,0.00054243125,0.00046719064,0.0030755056,0.0050353655,0.0031326609,0.0070256838,0.0028540795,0.000554058],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026523147,0.00061520754,0.6631263,0.0004700798,0.00007083501,0.0009086432,0.23107274,0.0002856906,0.0010019875,0.0031120956,0.0068368753,0.09223428],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001698869,0.00044476168,0.39444152,0.0006498648,0.00003573217,0.0004423048,0.58764374,0.0007567505,0.00090946653,0.0012626474,0.013257572,0.00013863735],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.36485818,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.45760244,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9985395,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.022301713,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08419748,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.72546893},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4214940852","doi":"10.1007/978-3-030-83255-1_7","title":"Understanding Provincial and Territorial Academic Integrity Policies for Elementary and Secondary Education in Canada","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Ethics and integrity in educational contexts","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"University of Guelph","keywords":"Academic integrity; Misconduct; Cheating; Formative assessment; Scientific misconduct; Political science; Public relations; Higher education; Pedagogy; Psychology; Social psychology; Medicine; Law","score_opus":0.10320901690278379,"score_gpt":0.36871139125908214,"score_spread":0.26550237435629837,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4214940852","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8659768,0.0035465055,0.0012765118,0.03931105,0.00013860098,0.000265457,0.0043122726,0.00011129651,0.08506148],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98944515,0.0009910509,0.0007323615,0.001460984,0.000013619467,0.00004999365,0.00056663173,0.000020299527,0.006719918],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9867328,0.0011990282,0.0005467117,0.0008712275,0.005127525,0.0055227117],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9275756,0.01153551,0.006245105,0.0016084977,0.034537766,0.018497583],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0076464093,0.0002000352,0.00048346407,0.003714396,0.0154665075,0.008463804,0.0029814495,0.0014116216,0.0053534685],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03170075,0.00054330396,0.00049925945,0.007813327,0.004803626,0.002097065,0.0035489814,0.002432729,0.00039611312],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021690126,0.00021131376,0.7029999,0.000791489,0.00012462864,0.00081415544,0.06576641,0.0029436874,0.001062259,0.08922663,0.04493251,0.09091013],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002136743,0.000062616375,0.76907176,0.001026957,0.00008299991,0.00012336395,0.10053512,0.001963971,0.0007405014,0.0029212572,0.1233194,0.00013074216],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9975969,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9986112,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.25737444,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.25737444,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.46104264,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8613404},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4214943933","doi":"10.1007/978-3-030-83255-1_30","title":"Academic Integrity Through a SoTL Lens and 4M Framework: An Institutional Self-Study","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Ethics and integrity in educational contexts","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"Higher Education Academy; University of Guelph; University of Calgary; Johns Hopkins University","keywords":"Academic integrity; Discipline; Institution; Stakeholder; Scholarship; Public relations; Political science; Organizational culture; Centrality; Engineering ethics; Sociology; Psychology; Engineering; Social science","score_opus":0.13252478868938408,"score_gpt":0.4157857426673022,"score_spread":0.2832609539779182,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4214943933","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.83589303,0.0011795576,0.02560725,0.035041142,0.00017448772,0.00044222825,0.00010862184,0.00007062519,0.101483],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99367964,0.00024068783,0.0030271066,0.00060595473,0.000024807727,0.00017809261,0.000017162882,0.00002053883,0.0022060159],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9379738,0.054117046,0.000978499,0.0013630532,0.0037054066,0.0018621652],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9122043,0.063980654,0.006984281,0.0038948855,0.0077109025,0.0052249813],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05078126,0.0003986759,0.0006436792,0.0054087415,0.015667494,0.01588552,0.0024479423,0.0026931176,0.0050899303],"category_scores_gemma":[0.046383373,0.00028355038,0.00045267216,0.004382295,0.04608305,0.013851364,0.018121738,0.0062038465,0.00050629175],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027833317,0.00018214853,0.008790087,0.00017880749,0.000009914513,0.00030299922,0.64891416,0.0002665694,0.0001781075,0.3250903,0.0017184183,0.014340649],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007769024,0.000093692346,0.0036568416,0.00035015913,0.000008871505,0.00018619573,0.91562665,0.0010589836,0.0002919957,0.04570445,0.032995343,0.000018956964],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028930672,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003105056,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9973069,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01681829,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012670007,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26856023},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4214950379","doi":"10.1007/978-3-030-83255-1_15","title":"Managing Academic Integrity in Canadian Engineering Schools","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Ethics and integrity in educational contexts","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Regina","funders":"University of Guelph","keywords":"Academic integrity; Warrant; Misconduct; Work (physics); Engineering ethics; Political science; Scientific misconduct; Public relations; Structural integrity; Medical education; Engineering; Medicine; Business; Alternative medicine; Law","score_opus":0.060120480704169234,"score_gpt":0.3553220936204014,"score_spread":0.29520161291623215,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4214950379","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07193962,0.018877568,0.0032116687,0.10252716,0.0015735077,0.00014300243,0.00017842143,0.0002939325,0.8012551],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5607164,0.017217534,0.005040057,0.008803014,0.0002791336,0.000046856123,0.00016682873,0.00011074974,0.4076194],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99529463,0.00067246123,0.00009382421,0.0002257222,0.002404665,0.0013087249],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9942326,0.0005330784,0.00025467112,0.00012435505,0.0031223956,0.0017328645],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032979224,0.00033871827,0.00023786287,0.002916758,0.023630112,0.010696265,0.002182437,0.0025175116,0.0115927495],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003945384,0.00031629304,0.00027289096,0.003898219,0.006607113,0.0021529223,0.0042095874,0.0024073778,0.001579612],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029602215,0.000113846945,0.010496269,0.0004159052,0.0000107293945,0.0009102186,0.07124591,0.0013158943,0.00093736284,0.2201463,0.3513829,0.34299502],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002238198,0.000015237768,0.005046667,0.00022026029,0.000005506567,0.0001066639,0.019671496,0.00024029816,0.00038422868,0.003608481,0.9706731,0.000025868902],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9209,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9794409,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9974825,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.090568975,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.21773313,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.657127},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4220901071","doi":"10.1016/j.jecp.2022.105417","title":"Effects of test difficulty messaging on academic cheating among middle school children","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Child Psychology","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Cheating; Psychology; Test (biology); Social psychology; Developmental psychology; Affect (linguistics); Communication","score_opus":0.01642155473215825,"score_gpt":0.3349975855542344,"score_spread":0.3185760308220762,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4220901071","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99936944,0.000023513954,0.0000059105196,0.00003634994,0.0000037341792,0.000006576761,0.000023965815,0.000003515328,0.0005270539],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994099,0.000024328587,0.000036803343,0.00001924557,0.000009543381,0.000010481972,0.00003600061,0.0000044997355,0.00044930185],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99818134,0.0005616046,0.00020207262,0.00023054736,0.0004722979,0.00035220297],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9503129,0.030139232,0.01112902,0.0019191199,0.001572253,0.004927394],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017418507,0.0004288602,0.00051451137,0.001163049,0.00095143,0.0015620698,0.0007125948,0.001098549,0.0068964013],"category_scores_gemma":[0.034995247,0.0003676684,0.00042766405,0.00058817165,0.0005889045,0.0009881594,0.0010207191,0.0022521387,0.0005829095],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00848454,0.0108986925,0.9433549,0.00011876963,0.00015908101,0.0007411552,0.005906556,0.00014281391,0.0072114454,0.00025609726,0.0004906397,0.022235323],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000045792094,0.0015209785,0.9958209,0.000017357657,0.00004412952,0.00011028355,0.0014994587,0.00012193244,0.0006163636,0.0000434176,0.00014827486,0.000011117709],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038802682,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004799659,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9989014,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007901969,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006981695,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.023070753},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4226275569","doi":"10.1139/facets-2021-0041","title":"Students’ mindsets on research integrity—a cross-cultural comparison","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"FACETS","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Enforcement; Value (mathematics); Exploratory research; Action (physics); Focus group; Qualitative research; Cross-cultural; Psychology; Pedagogy; Political science; Sociology; Social science; Computer science","score_opus":0.18713095533833554,"score_gpt":0.5246378819968419,"score_spread":0.33750692665850635,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4226275569","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9982126,0.00014725352,0.0001288328,0.00014085013,0.000009361284,0.000013787269,0.0000075252897,0.000002717413,0.0013370927],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992285,0.00016597669,0.00011477741,0.00009213982,0.000005717304,0.000014691689,0.000014075628,0.0000032256987,0.00036094245],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.992523,0.0032173186,0.0006866434,0.0004828438,0.002190435,0.0008997667],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9824776,0.007840205,0.0035301792,0.001219903,0.0024431392,0.0024890078],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011582029,0.00034305904,0.0007390629,0.0031612841,0.0025769682,0.0061780172,0.00069382193,0.0012026259,0.0015343977],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019903906,0.00043634,0.00067263417,0.0016380979,0.006050974,0.0023322161,0.0066391886,0.0020144102,0.00030383424],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021858452,0.0005150342,0.24532892,0.00022885669,0.00013754553,0.00043881286,0.7205027,0.00016330385,0.002879186,0.0020338376,0.00040196485,0.027151264],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019041685,0.0007121556,0.25674808,0.0002314804,0.000048171718,0.00096067553,0.7317568,0.00036246615,0.0011985585,0.0014773231,0.006387601,0.00009765519],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018332187,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020951051,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99879736,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015234178,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001741089,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.061252356},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4226520937","doi":"10.1007/s40979-022-00105-0","title":"New priorities for academic integrity: equity, diversity, inclusion, decolonization and Indigenization","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal for Educational Integrity","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":67,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenization; Scholarship; Equity (law); Inclusion (mineral); Decolonization; Diversity (politics); Sociology; Public relations; Political science; Pedagogy; Engineering ethics; Social science; Law; Anthropology","score_opus":0.07299590899366233,"score_gpt":0.4307373877076325,"score_spread":0.35774147871397016,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4226520937","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.035770778,0.007690671,0.015047612,0.883709,0.0022080718,0.00009687434,0.000035818568,0.0001361352,0.055305116],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91196847,0.0038953458,0.008955003,0.060060438,0.002751046,0.00018423425,0.00004536482,0.00012526657,0.012014803],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.8512848,0.10834908,0.0052789054,0.006104568,0.02002851,0.008954066],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.729095,0.13191299,0.027751535,0.029896978,0.038920287,0.04242322],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.12745084,0.00052189315,0.0015353741,0.0035755036,0.027040755,0.040317442,0.0036746766,0.011849631,0.0076618562],"category_scores_gemma":[0.14780544,0.00054973405,0.0008613105,0.0032401232,0.09430304,0.040507328,0.033648863,0.02614829,0.0013203457],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000053590426,0.00010628538,0.006399079,0.000353875,0.00002562467,0.00021898877,0.078520976,0.00014575991,0.00051155686,0.84235495,0.02316856,0.048140746],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000035756242,0.00018289927,0.0060750986,0.0020124898,0.000033213237,0.00049502193,0.13022798,0.00056812,0.0013918012,0.5856203,0.27321666,0.0001406449],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0058158776,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005990438,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98815036,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016849749,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.056245763,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6740325},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4229367227","doi":"10.4018/978-1-7998-8921-2.ch009","title":"Putting Plagiarism Under Scrutiny","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Advances in educational technologies and instructional design book series","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Kwantlen Polytechnic University","funders":"","keywords":"Commit; Scrutiny; Phenomenon; Academic integrity; Sign (mathematics); Academic writing; Political science; Academic dishonesty; Plagiarism detection; Public relations; Psychology; Higher education; Pedagogy; Law; Social psychology; Epistemology; Computer science","score_opus":0.021858592330532226,"score_gpt":0.28542426389215453,"score_spread":0.2635656715616223,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4229367227","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.100210816,0.055171292,0.012175719,0.053867724,0.0027138297,0.00012464088,0.00018206277,0.0006558183,0.77489823],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6979428,0.03867334,0.008283198,0.0072567356,0.0011289583,0.00006971763,0.00023362674,0.0006282131,0.24578345],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9958676,0.0012905975,0.000096551135,0.00029351652,0.0021024186,0.00034926127],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9932151,0.003924032,0.0005659527,0.0006232005,0.0013776884,0.00029402316],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030808055,0.0006546439,0.00066480204,0.004794878,0.011304125,0.01547587,0.0018298692,0.0032594614,0.010392669],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0110710645,0.00039121948,0.0004001414,0.003790602,0.012732809,0.012278305,0.0055657327,0.004699081,0.0018327119],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003252069,0.000060183025,0.0040340885,0.00089948805,0.000024935785,0.0025634475,0.3096708,0.00040518498,0.0026703342,0.37147453,0.069952145,0.23821239],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000042836605,0.000048587033,0.0042902636,0.0013797556,0.000022275673,0.0024105946,0.092679545,0.00030834723,0.0018073417,0.038361337,0.8586504,0.00003736348],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03161835,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06884958,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9967405,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012393551,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0070767165,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08992189},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["research_integrity"],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"other","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["research_integrity"],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"other","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W4229790673","doi":"10.3410/f.13335978.14707151","title":"Faculty Opinions recommendation of How to catch a cheat: an editor's perspective on a new age of plagiarism and data manipulation.","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"dataset","venue":"Faculty Opinions – Post-Publication Peer Review of the Biomedical Literature","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute","funders":"","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); Computer science; Data science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.08881443359355426,"score_gpt":0.4119066974669386,"score_spread":0.3230922638733843,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4229790673","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"dataset","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"dataset","genre_consensus":"dataset","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00089955964,0.0011411179,0.0028673846,0.05205751,0.005953661,0.00024837058,0.9226711,0.002125915,0.012035442],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0048360215,0.0016919655,0.013240289,0.011519522,0.0020034953,0.0007103587,0.9429012,0.0015215975,0.021575637],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.96929497,0.009678667,0.006155789,0.002607655,0.011261391,0.0010015281],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7722511,0.10054703,0.018830929,0.045211192,0.05264935,0.010510298],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.048720796,0.0011561888,0.0017683483,0.0076201214,0.0026799312,0.011039346,0.0043174685,0.004032472,0.05595093],"category_scores_gemma":[0.25704262,0.0011201409,0.0016846748,0.01624243,0.0014080764,0.006759016,0.004611837,0.005984657,0.051572546],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002346886,0.000005545588,0.00053773884,0.00014197822,0.000019031799,0.000004694027,0.0000140082975,0.000030478901,0.000020476346,0.00036520325,0.9948224,0.0040150397],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000888593,0.0000067479596,0.0024035263,0.00030882776,0.000030679854,0.000021263684,0.00005936158,0.00028349386,0.00022113252,0.0015269221,0.995014,0.00003521182],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.035904013,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13178785,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9959675,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004580412,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.023558218,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25766325},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4232523899","doi":"10.1515/ci.2013.35.4.21c","title":"Research Integrity–The Montreal Statement","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Chemistry International","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statement (logic); Research integrity; Engineering; Political science; Engineering ethics; Law","score_opus":0.058563964725656115,"score_gpt":0.3978301827632694,"score_spread":0.3392662180376133,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4232523899","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00081924937,0.005173334,0.008914355,0.6625377,0.058083262,0.0021841212,0.002660311,0.0016710599,0.25795656],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.042805407,0.0068330453,0.024635412,0.5233293,0.030570205,0.0054731886,0.0038011174,0.0026195962,0.3599327],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.7762427,0.054297436,0.028568054,0.027283639,0.089298524,0.02430959],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.38574392,0.11225502,0.028370738,0.115313105,0.30163357,0.056683645],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.17432307,0.0020513574,0.00492836,0.0048839706,0.012392279,0.043031752,0.011766659,0.07219101,0.088827044],"category_scores_gemma":[0.501539,0.004002794,0.0034388066,0.0048507494,0.018454019,0.014703613,0.011161973,0.062431455,0.09231867],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011559552,0.00003925917,0.00028615896,0.0004242862,0.00005165385,0.0002639115,0.0006290231,0.00009748611,0.00043674163,0.069488175,0.90349466,0.024673086],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000042561835,0.000031964315,0.0004673431,0.0010800861,0.000028520484,0.0002117833,0.00029309271,0.00021864839,0.00038842755,0.007523939,0.9896567,0.000057077727],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020346088,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020588588,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98162526,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018374715,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.15156059,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9219195},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["research_integrity"],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"other","about_ca_system":true,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"domain":"methods","study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"commentary","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W4234408137","doi":"10.4018/978-1-5225-8057-7.ch010","title":"Embedding Plagiarism Detection Mechanisms Into Learning Management Systems","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"IGI Global eBooks","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University of Edmonton","funders":"","keywords":"Plagiarism detection; Computer science; Architecture; Set (abstract data type); Embedding; Intellectual property; Learning Management; Software engineering; Service (business); Plug-in; Software; Multimedia; Artificial intelligence; Operating system; Programming language","score_opus":0.014289562717939183,"score_gpt":0.2701244565869876,"score_spread":0.2558348938690484,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4234408137","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03579667,0.024389101,0.72533303,0.0039385683,0.0005719027,0.0003956678,0.000424571,0.016977008,0.19217342],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3822382,0.02800676,0.40149286,0.0011779459,0.0008445285,0.0003914376,0.0012454225,0.0019494927,0.18265337],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990772,0.00023632268,0.000062265855,0.00014332288,0.00040002316,0.000080815415],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99853027,0.0007596311,0.00010096406,0.00029448917,0.0002444553,0.000070156275],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012058974,0.00047286908,0.00035719722,0.001714688,0.0005240851,0.0042512836,0.0013632813,0.0012919448,0.010223848],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003188246,0.00035681174,0.00033618548,0.0016111932,0.0008418999,0.004678233,0.0019128151,0.0015389543,0.006321594],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000061020055,0.00012295925,0.0009610086,0.0011057449,0.00003222515,0.00021070571,0.0013601375,0.0028294895,0.013442268,0.096487276,0.01907788,0.86430925],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003235353,0.00015827159,0.0038901998,0.001599583,0.0000876721,0.0010334414,0.00063809735,0.031782802,0.028543403,0.08079861,0.85135263,0.00008310577],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006845995,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009327689,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99870807,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013184512,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00096932065,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03420216},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"methods","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"design_other","genre":"methods","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W4238232622","doi":"10.4018/978-1-60566-952-2.ch005","title":"The Nature and Areas of Technoethical Inquiry","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Advances in information security, privacy, and ethics book series","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Scope (computer science); Engineering ethics; Set (abstract data type); Ideal (ethics); Management science; Knowledge management; Sociology; Epistemology; Engineering; Computer science","score_opus":0.018150218210730144,"score_gpt":0.3275251693988377,"score_spread":0.30937495118810754,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4238232622","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009977326,0.08691876,0.061574332,0.066551924,0.001525995,0.00040179215,0.00007213458,0.00011398191,0.7728638],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5709697,0.16943721,0.09356583,0.015887221,0.0026717866,0.0029465875,0.00016496629,0.000300333,0.14405634],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97940445,0.014457861,0.0007061906,0.0009528934,0.0038301975,0.00064826506],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97101575,0.024000837,0.00070892496,0.0016627889,0.0021415728,0.0004701614],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018553432,0.000542378,0.00065004383,0.0055410443,0.0052252393,0.016296148,0.0016021744,0.0037309562,0.003431994],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01943718,0.00064222876,0.000538102,0.006196944,0.049668558,0.016216012,0.0058424086,0.007312695,0.0008701568],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000039698584,0.000009083233,0.00011229701,0.00016660696,0.0000019981187,0.000060444425,0.010693834,0.00020845026,0.00008203408,0.96752197,0.002509374,0.01862996],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000037344596,0.0000123071395,0.00031145426,0.0014586482,0.0000029815221,0.00021632676,0.010849196,0.0006328114,0.0001979243,0.7676516,0.21865001,0.00001303703],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020813716,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024498727,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99626905,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008453313,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01078235,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09812111},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4238483600","doi":"10.1111/theo.12299","title":"Disguised Plagiarism","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Theoria","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Copying; Terminology; Publishing; Epistemology; Sociology; Philosophy; Literature; Linguistics; Law; Art; Political science","score_opus":0.027455380349443084,"score_gpt":0.3005129734863187,"score_spread":0.27305759313687566,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4238483600","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06165268,0.02448841,0.46349415,0.06200504,0.008902944,0.0012557204,0.002552189,0.016978672,0.3586703],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.67266595,0.009628484,0.16036898,0.022438603,0.0069236355,0.0012787422,0.002944405,0.009097862,0.11465333],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.94063604,0.025644172,0.004893185,0.0065856557,0.020863278,0.0013776022],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.74977374,0.08490589,0.02065844,0.107513376,0.03533464,0.0018139608],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021939902,0.0011669568,0.0010807306,0.011081552,0.0049314853,0.011867081,0.0026540412,0.0055619674,0.017717525],"category_scores_gemma":[0.18207534,0.0009475161,0.00096603524,0.00869213,0.013740724,0.023236686,0.00965349,0.0067896526,0.014091477],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00029775724,0.00007120235,0.00664455,0.0017982011,0.00013475773,0.0013145724,0.04180876,0.0009328962,0.008046798,0.35542348,0.12191795,0.46160915],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004779405,0.00015094911,0.0038780954,0.0014616619,0.000067367764,0.0048385896,0.0028591463,0.0017816464,0.009182582,0.19970776,0.7758141,0.00021030246],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014259381,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011822077,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99443805,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003624546,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002721978,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11603069},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["research_integrity"],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"other","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["research_integrity"],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"other","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W4239380420","doi":"10.53761/1.2.3.2","title":"Proper Acknowledgment?","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"La Trobe University; University of Victoria","keywords":"Acknowledgement; Copying; Academic integrity; Context (archaeology); Attribution; Originality; Perception; Pedagogy; Judgement; Sociology; Engineering ethics; Psychology; Public relations; Political science; Social psychology; Social science; Computer science; Qualitative research; Law; Engineering","score_opus":0.016432629693526872,"score_gpt":0.2966213521086365,"score_spread":0.2801887224151096,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4239380420","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20196238,0.009090621,0.07263694,0.24336015,0.005636888,0.00015098242,0.00009264053,0.00063669414,0.46643272],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94252765,0.0015636287,0.0036398387,0.012891678,0.0008003427,0.000048727954,0.0000333396,0.00017595572,0.038318828],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9742717,0.015152586,0.0012810944,0.0017598198,0.005962456,0.0015723038],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93703794,0.02781831,0.011076967,0.0081731295,0.011264159,0.0046294546],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019903969,0.00029128673,0.00040402715,0.0009883859,0.005645741,0.008980798,0.0011971907,0.0032985117,0.009244863],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11285612,0.00028114463,0.00034011988,0.001002449,0.014419966,0.015921641,0.008333354,0.0052390727,0.0030776293],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010036156,0.000054216904,0.0076728985,0.00035736588,0.00002700914,0.0011165629,0.31549707,0.00015263913,0.001726216,0.5383179,0.03147705,0.10350072],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019006864,0.00012500248,0.004364957,0.00089690887,0.00002889601,0.0022682708,0.10787222,0.0006780474,0.0024725108,0.28667423,0.59451973,0.0000802373],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015176306,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013284993,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9967015,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030910433,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00477816,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10526353},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4241413600","doi":"10.1007/s10459-019-09877-6","title":"Editorial","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"editorial","venue":"Advances in Health Sciences Education","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Medical education","score_opus":0.012279382486109897,"score_gpt":0.4155236034710604,"score_spread":0.4032442209849505,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4241413600","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000025057128,0.002530963,0.0000739308,0.032308098,0.9607168,0.000030619085,0.00007470682,0.0000518462,0.0041880636],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00042802846,0.002612795,0.00010704631,0.02475924,0.946365,0.00004473083,0.000080595615,0.00005883975,0.025543708],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9918767,0.001730209,0.0008453509,0.00090880884,0.003986436,0.00065247103],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9657426,0.009792009,0.0027521215,0.0013776554,0.0145180365,0.005817641],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008098402,0.0033690487,0.0033881005,0.0055186925,0.0040578996,0.011875224,0.0034024701,0.017087432,0.061037406],"category_scores_gemma":[0.049622178,0.0011506891,0.0027406604,0.001880387,0.0022677039,0.0036887708,0.0028330348,0.013520009,0.038094647],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014170571,0.0000046946134,0.000013333161,0.00008818184,0.0000074738996,0.000058072692,0.0000064309643,0.0000073181727,0.000014565603,0.000114918046,0.9964071,0.0032638118],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006811935,0.000013910752,0.0001312589,0.00047225342,0.000034678535,0.00016501517,0.000031806823,0.000063670246,0.000048933543,0.0009181902,0.9980398,0.000012520961],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018381254,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005803173,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9389626,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0040390138,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004597838,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4242471523","doi":"10.1126/science.297.5590.2189b","title":"Overseas Students Scrutinized","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Science","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology","score_opus":0.045332706633837774,"score_gpt":0.36512664642666803,"score_spread":0.3197939397928303,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4242471523","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.42056295,0.0026892046,0.0016044212,0.110985726,0.007320295,0.0003914001,0.0008263568,0.00043349064,0.45518625],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5291553,0.0013472042,0.0006573506,0.053732462,0.0016974754,0.00010113749,0.0003611267,0.00021248199,0.4127355],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99237835,0.0020397117,0.00032697845,0.00058435596,0.0031073205,0.0015633255],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9788802,0.0037820977,0.002093944,0.0025159386,0.008475275,0.0042525697],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0057988386,0.00042412832,0.00043768997,0.0018340312,0.010219844,0.007387676,0.0008458307,0.0027996448,0.031879403],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026162755,0.00027066644,0.00037653142,0.0026600952,0.0029404422,0.0021903506,0.005223393,0.0047541666,0.008416944],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019923072,0.00022074621,0.05336085,0.00035752208,0.00004364061,0.0028680158,0.19248347,0.000083158484,0.008802397,0.05035719,0.50343895,0.18778479],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013835914,0.00014859016,0.023772204,0.00022786333,0.000035426594,0.0009431892,0.0728803,0.00015944225,0.0029926205,0.0029151018,0.89587384,0.00003756281],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013453774,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017408252,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99720037,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031582622,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006651924,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10664719},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4243348252","doi":"10.1503/cmaj.060095","title":"Les journaux font-ils assez d'efforts pour prévenir la publication frauduleuse?","year":2006,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Medical Association Journal","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Font; Humanities; Computer science; Library science; World Wide Web; Art; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.011579339747760552,"score_gpt":0.266945886867285,"score_spread":0.25536654711952445,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4243348252","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010879205,0.015859982,0.0029907816,0.9347714,0.014209836,0.000049251186,0.00010886755,0.00023901106,0.02089162],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.39669397,0.047581583,0.027357168,0.33989376,0.052175935,0.00030919147,0.00046968757,0.00078514277,0.13473362],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9103375,0.04090994,0.00770021,0.004888806,0.031465415,0.004698065],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.5893832,0.14710353,0.0442229,0.026548635,0.15885592,0.033885922],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.10606732,0.00072438695,0.0012281811,0.0048942785,0.011414351,0.034181852,0.002702821,0.016220486,0.011759342],"category_scores_gemma":[0.36031118,0.0009009475,0.0008233539,0.005369214,0.010197719,0.016697476,0.0043723825,0.013319775,0.006388581],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00046856768,0.00029572155,0.030949518,0.0015358279,0.00026144105,0.0016374479,0.024179196,0.00019265995,0.00278449,0.1327083,0.5545079,0.250479],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000692907,0.00013439733,0.012149878,0.0014539309,0.00012604371,0.0017471246,0.01757495,0.0005797994,0.0019381022,0.03563205,0.92838013,0.00021428084],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013543077,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022327144,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9837795,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010410996,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.029987704,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5609443},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4243847526","doi":"10.3917/ems.beaul.2017.01.0228","title":"Chapitre 14. Les bonnes pratiques en mati�re d�int�grit� intellectuelle�: le cas du plagiat","year":2017,"lang":"fr","type":"book-chapter","venue":"EMS Editions eBooks","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"The Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Art","score_opus":0.03221631229924424,"score_gpt":0.2827452705815774,"score_spread":0.2505289582823331,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4243847526","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.026726166,0.015037572,0.011998834,0.107864305,0.0047371592,0.00018286092,0.00039944632,0.00019199845,0.8328616],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.43094566,0.011796693,0.008778637,0.026242247,0.0024977454,0.0003663765,0.0004719394,0.00039341787,0.5185073],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9943824,0.0026236924,0.00022043583,0.00064682734,0.001272729,0.00085382676],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960057,0.0017327932,0.00042818364,0.00028948244,0.00095828995,0.0005855985],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036933005,0.0006645445,0.00046030348,0.0014424463,0.00954156,0.013376962,0.0015495,0.0048199752,0.035788994],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00914024,0.0003594182,0.0005980862,0.0014516996,0.0120559605,0.0069672624,0.006572355,0.0085801985,0.0083907945],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000043424076,0.00004873675,0.0015485253,0.00036708542,0.000013898957,0.0012647382,0.10417035,0.00017726392,0.00059642293,0.7898997,0.07325525,0.028614584],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009417944,0.000028590903,0.0024218317,0.0010362472,0.000008277831,0.00077704823,0.04592153,0.00016848897,0.00036860738,0.06988747,0.879341,0.000031582178],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019537993,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03715835,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99518,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009869967,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010404051,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11972606},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4245665089","doi":"10.1007/978-981-287-079-7_55-1","title":"Peer-to-Peer File Sharing and Academic Integrity in the Internet Age","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"File sharing; Academic integrity; The Internet; Peer-to-peer; Internet privacy; Computer science; World Wide Web; Psychology; Library science","score_opus":0.11385766776922647,"score_gpt":0.3529047414929328,"score_spread":0.23904707372370637,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4245665089","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0146808205,0.058314767,0.012052601,0.022787109,0.0011827641,0.00003736149,0.00009777911,0.00014573937,0.890701],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5601603,0.09348316,0.0067606345,0.0030734465,0.005166282,0.00010655986,0.00015417521,0.00017385543,0.3309216],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.998489,0.00053385325,0.00006007281,0.000150947,0.00058573624,0.0001803227],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9945527,0.0035150512,0.00041077146,0.00073212566,0.0005735937,0.00021575896],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014803755,0.00034058176,0.0004171879,0.0015430702,0.0030483275,0.008229304,0.0010695466,0.0034483154,0.016958173],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008132736,0.00019195679,0.00026287718,0.0037077318,0.008515759,0.01553577,0.003442446,0.0032691127,0.0033100354],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013023195,0.000019963005,0.00020691584,0.0001072625,0.0000039141,0.00008852859,0.0041183205,0.0002495541,0.00015387828,0.9074926,0.021433583,0.06611247],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000043423047,0.00001696518,0.00044152126,0.000273834,0.0000055763635,0.00043323546,0.0022272868,0.0005601017,0.00040463734,0.67530316,0.3203133,0.000015966018],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016832206,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016997617,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9965517,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002330873,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024023454,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.056730747},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4250472886","doi":"10.1016/j.ajog.2015.12.012","title":"Reply","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Misnomer; Scientific misconduct; Medicine; Alternative medicine; Pathology; Philosophy; Theology","score_opus":0.02497326017995936,"score_gpt":0.2942877262642305,"score_spread":0.2693144660842711,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4250472886","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00029822043,0.0004966903,0.000058214504,0.974208,0.022123111,0.00001810658,0.00004842191,0.000027169639,0.002722007],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0012101759,0.00016572153,0.000041587584,0.9825507,0.010226867,0.000026617345,0.000013672718,0.000010177013,0.0057544457],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99244213,0.0012027202,0.00081920595,0.001201556,0.00233701,0.0019974024],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97879624,0.009601194,0.00200367,0.0007798227,0.004194801,0.0046242373],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0066366573,0.0010392135,0.0020408866,0.0018579855,0.011420444,0.010240972,0.004162404,0.1514238,0.01633042],"category_scores_gemma":[0.061976343,0.0018252452,0.0023710716,0.0013046166,0.006097681,0.0057073254,0.005528942,0.07974752,0.013176364],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023110153,0.000016349042,0.00069879694,0.00003174714,0.000019261144,0.0009166693,0.00026623902,0.00003375407,0.00007257601,0.0018886278,0.99363285,0.0024001638],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001168974,0.00006193029,0.0030071854,0.0005433137,0.000086374115,0.0015321674,0.0016957485,0.0003180302,0.00028124554,0.009476395,0.98272693,0.00015384157],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017206792,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023195088,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8485762,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007966648,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014141573,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4250893404","doi":"10.1007/bf03018859","title":"New media","year":2000,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d anesthésie","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto General Hospital","funders":"","keywords":"Business","score_opus":0.0167505340540397,"score_gpt":0.23437866218076464,"score_spread":0.21762812812672494,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4250893404","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00046986016,0.005561431,0.0004761692,0.0055614603,0.009864625,0.000063359774,0.002347234,0.0008030058,0.97485286],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.001267969,0.002713109,0.00019234126,0.00093566376,0.0022387677,0.000028777391,0.00097626797,0.00020307401,0.99144405],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998667,0.00009646898,0.000068452755,0.0001519979,0.0008780368,0.0001381168],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99586606,0.00059448887,0.00026769913,0.0006643872,0.0016469669,0.00096043316],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010722618,0.001239061,0.000872297,0.0061116894,0.0022420634,0.010612448,0.0014656285,0.0020161576,0.6860168],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005336152,0.0006059997,0.00060790876,0.006065971,0.00120209,0.007989007,0.0033970322,0.0026178092,0.54949415],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033407807,0.000032539443,0.00021115632,0.00019001722,0.000004813452,0.00006512921,0.00008092786,0.000027731647,0.0003924952,0.004941516,0.85168236,0.14233792],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000036565048,0.0000051426246,0.00039483342,0.0000668657,0.0000025856323,0.000039162875,0.00007195589,0.000023487273,0.00006761584,0.00063993584,0.9986802,0.0000046726036],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006199385,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017129183,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9979838,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016185357,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027546303,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4252524822","doi":"10.3410/f.1020460.232598","title":"Faculty Opinions recommendation of On the theory of noncovalent binding.","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"dataset","venue":"Faculty Opinions – Post-Publication Peer Review of the Biomedical Literature","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Non-covalent interactions; Computational biology; Chemistry; Computer science; Data science; Biology; Molecule; Organic chemistry","score_opus":0.05184826836098833,"score_gpt":0.3797756023022209,"score_spread":0.3279273339412326,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4252524822","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"dataset","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"dataset","genre_consensus":"dataset","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00021202798,0.00010544173,0.00028924074,0.00020975292,0.00007902517,0.000032974967,0.99605906,0.0010041889,0.0020083156],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00080367294,0.00009272498,0.0006894528,0.00012684643,0.00002294323,0.00009203164,0.99532735,0.00011825259,0.002726653],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99752074,0.0004374569,0.00022547942,0.0006864612,0.0007910269,0.00033880313],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953367,0.0010399203,0.0004238173,0.0017216998,0.0009987201,0.00047920304],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025956687,0.0034768707,0.0026865592,0.005026074,0.0011856225,0.0044790385,0.0055010817,0.0036694412,0.107504755],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012807685,0.0010528439,0.002588931,0.0061204135,0.0005550441,0.0021619475,0.0021935867,0.0029617415,0.156702],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000049632603,0.000027112517,0.0007172577,0.0003063998,0.00003215276,0.000010074045,0.0000055488345,0.00027559063,0.000079505866,0.00033866434,0.995644,0.002514119],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00041191117,0.00003459111,0.0062852125,0.00019952792,0.00007650121,0.000058202764,0.000035085748,0.002891941,0.00092098804,0.003339473,0.98570627,0.000040217725],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.027052023,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05393096,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99740434,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023519907,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004523207,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35963923},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4254831865","doi":"10.22215/etd/2016-11506","title":"Black, White, and Grey: (Re)Constructing the One-Size-Fits-All Approach to Plagiarism","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Intertextuality; Rhetorical question; Interpretation (philosophy); Academic integrity; Sociology; Discourse analysis; Plagiarism detection; White (mutation); Mathematics education; Pedagogy; Linguistics; Psychology; Computer science; Social psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03159095945665744,"score_gpt":0.3002092690770961,"score_spread":0.26861830962043864,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4254831865","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5269275,0.0025621874,0.1305856,0.10957866,0.0008968865,0.0010187626,0.0002010546,0.00028617537,0.2279433],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96053296,0.00065351615,0.020806279,0.0035709143,0.000049661605,0.00044730032,0.00004534484,0.0002862539,0.013607781],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.94220275,0.050419632,0.00056829455,0.0014517405,0.003880268,0.00147733],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9303201,0.057256866,0.0020311174,0.0042324527,0.004531873,0.0016276373],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05108008,0.0007757897,0.00077865896,0.0047359597,0.027881866,0.011728512,0.0032569417,0.0034399475,0.0050073136],"category_scores_gemma":[0.076258965,0.0008113903,0.00052082323,0.0035686502,0.049488448,0.01804211,0.01297474,0.008954007,0.0008369017],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013846878,0.000013122743,0.00045881004,0.00008249513,0.000003045215,0.00011860789,0.94903344,0.00005311849,0.0003507342,0.03955864,0.001528621,0.008785599],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007387468,0.000020710153,0.00049507705,0.00037897422,0.000012446093,0.00011136361,0.9131887,0.0003477746,0.00055273576,0.032637406,0.05222767,0.000019717527],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021497682,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03815451,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99656004,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014155694,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016967,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27014053},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["research_integrity"],"domain":null,"study_design":"qualitative","genre":"other","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["research_integrity"],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"other","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W4255515193","doi":"10.4018/978-1-60566-952-2.ch009","title":"Educational and Professional Technoethics","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Advances in information security, privacy, and ethics book series","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Happening; Upload; The Internet; Sociology; Public relations; Political science; Internet privacy; Media studies; Engineering ethics; Engineering; World Wide Web; Computer science; History","score_opus":0.02065364137475983,"score_gpt":0.3373308955193599,"score_spread":0.3166772541446001,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4255515193","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0019814912,0.008676161,0.0035082565,0.009686718,0.0010262831,0.00004011923,0.000035115365,0.000056885347,0.97498906],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.10149751,0.016421411,0.0036692426,0.0025431314,0.0011232144,0.00013502534,0.00007026212,0.00012554541,0.8744147],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99793077,0.0007039377,0.00007550583,0.0001630845,0.00086793833,0.00025870407],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998041,0.0006956635,0.00011554202,0.00030688362,0.0004907773,0.00035021515],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001636282,0.00050136825,0.00027461356,0.0015898742,0.0032554236,0.0065963524,0.00059804687,0.0018512858,0.04141814],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0041517816,0.00023122784,0.00022114653,0.0015711893,0.006845431,0.0035153897,0.0028376859,0.002342633,0.010381983],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000883442,0.000047316495,0.00027077357,0.00016998943,0.0000024609838,0.00008641684,0.003799099,0.00026172065,0.00017527178,0.8147368,0.10109071,0.07935065],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002238022,0.00000960081,0.0003309935,0.0003301686,0.0000012211369,0.00011370325,0.0009190103,0.00019938003,0.00012717,0.07360365,0.9243588,0.0000040654404],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022022717,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0034920273,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99814874,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004068074,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004361384,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1385575},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4283209815","doi":"10.1016/j.dib.2022.108405","title":"Dataset of the effect of difficulty messaging on academic cheating in middle school Chinese children","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Data in Brief","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Cheating; Academic dishonesty; Psychology; Test (biology); Social psychology; Logistic regression; Developmental psychology; Statistics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.02541380733969296,"score_gpt":0.328697765891789,"score_spread":0.30328395855209606,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4283209815","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"dataset","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"dataset","genre_consensus":"dataset","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2601695,0.00037961567,0.0009632717,0.0004352915,0.00009696336,0.00032443227,0.7334441,0.0004388782,0.0037479503],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.17538945,0.00019088772,0.0020177814,0.000106352054,0.00006636645,0.001058933,0.8176007,0.00005853245,0.0035110377],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989681,0.00014797533,0.000117874115,0.00022418977,0.00032548755,0.00021638683],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9955018,0.0008812253,0.0006221381,0.00095715234,0.0014209342,0.0006166829],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011781405,0.0008542178,0.00081783073,0.0034274275,0.0009897607,0.0005683085,0.0015662742,0.0013369591,0.008680602],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0046471385,0.00026697427,0.00081166177,0.0039229556,0.00045065052,0.00044594472,0.0015106436,0.00077,0.0032790424],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0014962865,0.0014642549,0.6625617,0.0014439616,0.00035400398,0.0015951236,0.0014742468,0.0015272758,0.0041888864,0.0011696849,0.25354025,0.06918437],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008275969,0.00022059063,0.953208,0.00010543284,0.00009574224,0.0003089619,0.00084174104,0.0014896061,0.0012621222,0.00030703182,0.042015903,0.0000620676],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.047602016,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06949609,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99866307,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012213943,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002275862,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09464991},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4283704156","doi":"10.1177/01655515221097623","title":"Do retraction practices work effectively? Evidence from citations of psychological retracted articles","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Information Science","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"National Social Science Fund of China; Ministry of Education of the People's Republic of China","keywords":"Citation; Credibility; Quality (philosophy); Psychology; Inference; Web of science; Process (computing); Computer science; MEDLINE; World Wide Web; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.09565337181427233,"score_gpt":0.42321451935441334,"score_spread":0.327561147540141,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4283704156","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92372185,0.03116368,0.004542602,0.01752133,0.0006919368,0.0004726932,0.00031777789,0.0001260238,0.021442104],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98650986,0.0077758674,0.002478754,0.0012765599,0.00054044806,0.00010770096,0.00012336358,0.00004800213,0.0011393485],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.884712,0.064142555,0.016008073,0.0058466513,0.026718883,0.0025719611],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.18428105,0.6138671,0.12575446,0.02969768,0.04235531,0.0040445],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.07021914,0.0006436546,0.0009041068,0.0075604212,0.0027796084,0.0068139345,0.0024607293,0.0043866765,0.006238515],"category_scores_gemma":[0.6069822,0.00059376785,0.001476416,0.008236666,0.005218009,0.009546523,0.0031238608,0.0034789909,0.0014104693],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0032175814,0.001207229,0.4488672,0.011227732,0.00188193,0.0021206015,0.07058508,0.00056435773,0.0023833448,0.009670546,0.0059363754,0.4423381],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009173016,0.0036556888,0.83250535,0.011385266,0.0032499088,0.004594101,0.046822272,0.002431276,0.0061756657,0.03377758,0.054170858,0.00031481],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016205282,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015434045,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99561334,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018244627,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004625547,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37135875},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","research_integrity"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","research_integrity"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W4290739321","doi":"10.55057/ijares.2022.4.2.8","title":"Academic Dishonesty in Online Assessment from Tertiary Students’ Perspective","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Advanced Research in Education and Society","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cheating; Tertiary institution; Academic dishonesty; Commit; Medical education; Institution; Higher education; Tertiary care; Quarter (Canadian coin); Psychology; Online assessment; Academic institution; Medicine; Mathematics education; Computer science; Political science; Social psychology; Family medicine; Library science","score_opus":0.049134405836265965,"score_gpt":0.519339543474008,"score_spread":0.4702051376377421,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4290739321","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9882606,0.0003244735,0.00091768295,0.0018580715,0.000029445748,0.000022777314,0.000021888232,0.00001881127,0.008546277],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987618,0.00010979926,0.00020083316,0.00018532982,0.000015108553,0.0000037995487,0.0000071046,0.0000027620697,0.0007135156],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98010534,0.010152954,0.0012496274,0.0005664053,0.00632538,0.0016003714],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9406452,0.018905599,0.020445075,0.0030314527,0.009897356,0.0070752706],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009107998,0.00025704518,0.00042336402,0.0016952358,0.0026243425,0.00591034,0.0007094067,0.00095488137,0.004045035],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03523583,0.00017098166,0.0003662331,0.001133495,0.0029554444,0.0024880902,0.002865985,0.0025537044,0.0007441598],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002480435,0.0008363809,0.7655681,0.00039796095,0.00006747047,0.0017718844,0.13306122,0.00027073827,0.0036977804,0.0038963766,0.003228162,0.08695601],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018513663,0.00095571904,0.71602046,0.0005881417,0.00010557721,0.0036523794,0.24600771,0.002396382,0.005804906,0.0039566844,0.02034339,0.00015012732],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015797798,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003021929,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99904513,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017523675,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002207205,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.048168242},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4291899447","doi":"10.1007/s43545-022-00468-8","title":"Academic freedom, the impact agenda, and pressures to publish: understanding the driving forces in higher education","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SN Social Sciences","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Fonds de Recherche du Québec-Société et Culture","keywords":"Publish or perish; Academic freedom; Publication; Impartiality; Political science; Public relations; Accountability; Higher education; Function (biology); Sociology; Law and economics; Law; Publishing","score_opus":0.1316843744306501,"score_gpt":0.39959903352392984,"score_spread":0.2679146590932797,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4291899447","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19077127,0.009731527,0.0032817733,0.4838692,0.001155508,0.00006353174,0.0003647705,0.00010712299,0.31065542],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9843986,0.002373396,0.00037667548,0.0060306718,0.0011444236,0.000025823774,0.000056865127,0.00005738967,0.005536164],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9726961,0.01357011,0.0013117164,0.0012967369,0.007802993,0.0033223464],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7135372,0.1884836,0.03682102,0.008841133,0.01723914,0.03507786],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04368885,0.00033301357,0.0006682481,0.0062517193,0.011735434,0.039763004,0.0019867981,0.0064497734,0.014955688],"category_scores_gemma":[0.15357877,0.00049641886,0.00048157835,0.010356264,0.041149803,0.02840042,0.013070004,0.011457764,0.0019854656],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002071611,0.00025850575,0.038457125,0.0005261892,0.000056855268,0.00027551485,0.060206737,0.00044924286,0.00036221926,0.81958,0.02465458,0.054965854],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000056541805,0.00007921905,0.042411234,0.0010314563,0.000034498506,0.00019519031,0.09216986,0.000551493,0.0005817861,0.74875176,0.11400645,0.00013049334],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0053833597,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008860662,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95631117,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009454054,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.023687331,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2310515},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4296193289","doi":"10.1007/s10805-022-09458-0","title":"Contract Cheating in Iran: An Overview of Key Issues and a Call to Action","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Academic Ethics","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Cheating; Scholarship; Legislation; Action (physics); Accountability; Exploratory research; Public relations; Call to action; Business; Political science; Qualitative research; Sociology; Psychology; Marketing; Social psychology; Law; Social science","score_opus":0.2809573541461012,"score_gpt":0.49572716345924545,"score_spread":0.21476980931314427,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4296193289","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.041575395,0.37080353,0.0019623733,0.5545635,0.0029262009,0.00014132509,0.00014955772,0.00005477211,0.02782329],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.48858514,0.42359638,0.0053964662,0.06853356,0.006277222,0.00019510217,0.00025112322,0.000048304533,0.0071166577],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99046654,0.003959095,0.0009294819,0.00043829894,0.0024841677,0.0017224811],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9769249,0.011631479,0.003919439,0.00037585635,0.005282243,0.001866139],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016555987,0.0004508948,0.00086216774,0.00589106,0.005336717,0.010686107,0.002504379,0.00978414,0.0046681324],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019400276,0.00044318932,0.0011610924,0.007578597,0.009287215,0.010966682,0.0033000172,0.009259453,0.00036707093],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020969144,0.00060733664,0.04962852,0.006460482,0.00014938526,0.006031343,0.03160392,0.0009551566,0.0003640763,0.20668441,0.14143378,0.55587196],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006970729,0.00037845364,0.08041755,0.02206847,0.00020305537,0.011314169,0.12967893,0.0018172178,0.00047567874,0.09909216,0.6542247,0.0002599063],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.028632816,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.051955875,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99021584,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017929498,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.042861693,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13008821},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4296369701","doi":"10.1186/s41073-022-00125-x","title":"Reducing the Inadvertent Spread of Retracted Science: recommendations from the RISRS report","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research Integrity and Peer Review","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"Alfred P. Sloan Foundation","keywords":"Stakeholder; Public relations; Publishing; Scholarship; Stakeholder engagement; Political science; Process (computing); Business; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.21980025304315598,"score_gpt":0.48366776668941147,"score_spread":0.2638675136462555,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4296369701","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"reproducibility","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"reproducibility","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002506871,0.009072543,0.011014596,0.9359729,0.01575342,0.005311339,0.000597029,0.0009981438,0.01877301],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.043042216,0.059720736,0.33641195,0.4790224,0.009492112,0.02740961,0.0031026236,0.00091148133,0.04088681],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.66440713,0.17895441,0.059005257,0.00776552,0.07741773,0.0124499155],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.39425057,0.3156179,0.039794642,0.026606666,0.1787857,0.044944577],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.34433705,0.0034099354,0.0023083636,0.009658283,0.006703136,0.020776007,0.017139953,0.037374567,0.015482025],"category_scores_gemma":[0.4869279,0.0025220478,0.008800092,0.006662598,0.00898779,0.024862701,0.01655438,0.025414633,0.010297118],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023616076,0.0010003558,0.0027228133,0.01805977,0.00028735524,0.0011824518,0.009100603,0.0020038355,0.0009053934,0.034294892,0.73138416,0.19882222],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00047205674,0.0009054413,0.0032895496,0.048796386,0.00070950395,0.0005902288,0.020118661,0.0018917535,0.0020464128,0.021608304,0.8992315,0.00034011234],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015515348,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.030251376,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96262544,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010676892,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.21160483,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.80854917},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4296472389","doi":"10.1007/s40979-022-00116-x","title":"Recommendations for a balanced approach to supporting academic integrity: perspectives from a survey of students, faculty, and tutors","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal for Educational Integrity","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Athabasca University","funders":"Athabasca University","keywords":"Academic integrity; Cheating; Misconduct; Academic dishonesty; Context (archaeology); Research integrity; Medical education; Psychology; Scientific misconduct; Higher education; Data integrity; Public relations; Computer science; Political science; Medicine; Computer security; Social psychology","score_opus":0.14962581725922944,"score_gpt":0.4894700086381741,"score_spread":0.3398441913789446,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4296472389","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6663889,0.0024223735,0.0053675403,0.31511763,0.0006849829,0.00058246875,0.00028563436,0.00015433245,0.008996099],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9643916,0.00160443,0.0059407745,0.025732867,0.00017979441,0.00035770013,0.00012980225,0.000046064273,0.0016169958],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.89590514,0.07397179,0.007011769,0.0020121494,0.012337811,0.008761344],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7494131,0.121510595,0.02157712,0.005538938,0.055975977,0.045984227],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.09856869,0.00046625684,0.00089158834,0.0029934596,0.012393112,0.013489434,0.0024366921,0.005699794,0.004547096],"category_scores_gemma":[0.18623696,0.0005942083,0.0006379274,0.0030835455,0.00663827,0.010513196,0.0075721405,0.00744148,0.0008648517],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012214736,0.00049397466,0.12109108,0.0009629145,0.00005553204,0.0011195322,0.75087446,0.00018358207,0.0025092047,0.005836945,0.036425788,0.08032492],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018960278,0.00018468301,0.014179699,0.0007325066,0.000017528988,0.00027294952,0.9365889,0.0003254998,0.00043151132,0.002183009,0.044984706,0.00008007386],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009965314,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011194356,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9943002,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008723532,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.028107623,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5212873},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4296762334","doi":"10.31222/osf.io/9we43","title":"Reducing the residue of retractions in evidence synthesis: Ways to minimize inappropriate citation and use of retracted data","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Regina","funders":"Alfred P. Sloan Foundation","keywords":"Citation; Systematic review; Medical literature; MEDLINE; Evidence-based medicine; Computer science; Data science; Psychology; Medicine; Political science; Library science; Law","score_opus":0.22844322040221862,"score_gpt":0.375603707732273,"score_spread":0.14716048733005435,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4296762334","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"reproducibility","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":"reproducibility","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013476035,0.020717697,0.75652885,0.15793972,0.015822891,0.017693035,0.0011186284,0.005002219,0.0117009645],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.077190846,0.0069102226,0.86941844,0.017737942,0.0067743277,0.014636127,0.00077536795,0.002033006,0.0045237383],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.12587644,0.5984061,0.18237782,0.019289505,0.07105024,0.0029999658],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.015520955,0.7409848,0.08120127,0.09553481,0.06393078,0.0028274267],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.8032016,0.0059325006,0.011620774,0.040162712,0.011556494,0.03437399,0.016279973,0.024285642,0.014208059],"category_scores_gemma":[0.9565777,0.009908392,0.011565103,0.03880198,0.022354905,0.044917732,0.030473555,0.0268501,0.011519741],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0023716458,0.0005000727,0.0088359425,0.022700343,0.0033421223,0.001028449,0.035116214,0.0050564357,0.002769549,0.042853784,0.06507358,0.8103518],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0045281993,0.0021794252,0.01733649,0.072184674,0.0075353626,0.0028250038,0.015156557,0.037692763,0.014565135,0.46517074,0.35867676,0.0021488983],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003567316,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004484558,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9757144,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012857428,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06174533,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24268752},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4297154381","doi":"10.1177/15562646221128418","title":"Contract Cheating and Ghostwriting among University Students in Health Specialties","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia Hospital","funders":"King Fahad Medical City","keywords":"Cheating; Academic integrity; Misconduct; Psychology; Medical education; Health care; Perception; Family medicine; Medicine; Political science; Social psychology; Law","score_opus":0.6172843851496437,"score_gpt":0.6464755528501215,"score_spread":0.029191167700477805,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4297154381","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9996093,0.00006353514,0.000022986776,0.000071149334,0.000001981564,0.000008801749,0.0000071973977,8.1297406e-7,0.00021423529],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99961394,0.00010752852,0.000051988867,0.000063111256,0.0000056343333,0.0000068348663,0.000009507471,5.091237e-7,0.00014093949],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969373,0.0013540168,0.0004475331,0.00015196197,0.00072210375,0.00038706907],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.972984,0.006880066,0.014846238,0.0010661762,0.0019145864,0.0023089484],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037003537,0.00022209785,0.0003320128,0.0014305825,0.0014830903,0.0013309511,0.00042206788,0.00086181413,0.0019333657],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017532213,0.0003020891,0.00030803247,0.00082004187,0.001223183,0.0009104043,0.0010397978,0.0010688438,0.00029948924],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003761515,0.00023846055,0.9826749,0.000036867314,0.000012703778,0.00012655827,0.010825743,0.000015420497,0.0003146716,0.000049616683,0.0001257637,0.0055415803],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000070198007,0.00045187466,0.9570144,0.00008428297,0.00001565861,0.00072942156,0.040218752,0.00021383047,0.0003263949,0.000104993334,0.00081003294,0.000023345907],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0040677767,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005864162,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9991382,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00093690475,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017073407,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.019569635},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4297199072","doi":"10.1007/s40979-022-00111-2","title":"Proactive learner empowerment: towards a transformative academic integrity approach for English language learners","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal for Educational Integrity","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"The Scarborough Hospital; University of Toronto","funders":"University of Toronto Scarborough","keywords":"Psychology; Mathematics education; Thematic analysis; Higher education; Pedagogy; Academic integrity; Sociology; Qualitative research; Social psychology; Political science","score_opus":0.04923907067262269,"score_gpt":0.4019488676779118,"score_spread":0.35270979700528915,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4297199072","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6642902,0.0015036578,0.080221236,0.12449813,0.0012482987,0.0010064996,0.000060877515,0.0010007992,0.12617032],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97020155,0.0004483779,0.016622886,0.0034761268,0.00016740203,0.00040747906,0.000027779563,0.00008200936,0.008566444],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97789454,0.01667026,0.00035760712,0.0010589751,0.0021408254,0.001877781],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97975487,0.0085610105,0.0016926181,0.0015803756,0.0016640063,0.006747168],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021133186,0.0006588353,0.0004119539,0.001185552,0.0065601,0.012608886,0.002760312,0.0024988176,0.0042191986],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020840384,0.00036654185,0.0008200114,0.00047407072,0.010959118,0.0075163487,0.026577916,0.005921294,0.0008756758],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012837573,0.0025144976,0.017638724,0.0005663776,0.000060524268,0.001202903,0.6686872,0.00035355467,0.0048801154,0.057039946,0.01621603,0.2307118],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013270558,0.0011580996,0.009732731,0.001100395,0.000060731436,0.0015435093,0.6507361,0.0019424822,0.0065752445,0.077522874,0.24940427,0.000090842266],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004292727,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007714983,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9975012,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019703167,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009330627,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11176431},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4297239246","doi":"10.32920/21206825.v1","title":"Mad and disabled realities within academic integrity at the university level of education","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Ableism; Academic integrity; Thematic analysis; Psychology; Learning disability; Special education; Inclusion (mineral); Intellectual disability; Higher education; Pedagogy; Medical education; Mathematics education; Sociology; Qualitative research; Social psychology; Medicine; Political science; Developmental psychology; Social science; Gender studies","score_opus":0.1216151785911701,"score_gpt":0.3537352812084954,"score_spread":0.2321201026173253,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4297239246","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9552961,0.001073096,0.00065111334,0.011714011,0.00008775874,0.000023913688,0.000030342437,0.000023071358,0.031100582],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99761677,0.0001987933,0.000084736894,0.0003301367,0.000016961314,0.000008035688,0.0000050831327,0.000004872278,0.0017346214],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.97971374,0.013298828,0.000632278,0.0008149111,0.003032283,0.0025079162],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97107714,0.011334239,0.008213897,0.0021466995,0.0019096483,0.005318504],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009041001,0.00032943807,0.0005907073,0.0022499904,0.01998307,0.014977867,0.00127383,0.0020352972,0.0064381696],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027188389,0.00034416563,0.00037451755,0.002210446,0.030099332,0.007306287,0.013982494,0.006135227,0.0006198242],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032702486,0.00006257665,0.0147823375,0.00006830672,0.0000095061,0.00041753592,0.9635716,0.000036482543,0.00033183966,0.010914629,0.0011717508,0.008600804],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000033184854,0.000051228075,0.014606434,0.000118055075,0.000007535531,0.00034581276,0.96635365,0.00004172207,0.00033390662,0.0018000375,0.01631497,0.000023305249],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011040982,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01601415,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9979647,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009274956,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007612603,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.067294836},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4297360118","doi":"10.32920/21206825","title":"Mad and disabled realities within academic integrity at the university level of education","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Academic integrity; Ableism; Thematic analysis; Psychology; Higher education; Learning disability; Special education; Inclusion (mineral); Learning development; Pedagogy; Medical education; Mathematics education; Sociology; Qualitative research; Social psychology; Medicine; Political science; Developmental psychology; Social science; Gender studies","score_opus":0.1216151785911701,"score_gpt":0.3537352812084954,"score_spread":0.2321201026173253,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4297360118","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9552961,0.001073096,0.00065111334,0.011714011,0.00008775874,0.000023913688,0.000030342437,0.000023071358,0.031100582],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99761677,0.0001987933,0.000084736894,0.0003301367,0.000016961314,0.000008035688,0.0000050831327,0.000004872278,0.0017346214],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.97971374,0.013298828,0.000632278,0.0008149111,0.003032283,0.0025079162],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97107714,0.011334239,0.008213897,0.0021466995,0.0019096483,0.005318504],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009041001,0.00032943807,0.0005907073,0.0022499904,0.01998307,0.014977867,0.00127383,0.0020352972,0.0064381696],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027188389,0.00034416563,0.00037451755,0.002210446,0.030099332,0.007306287,0.013982494,0.006135227,0.0006198242],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032702486,0.00006257665,0.0147823375,0.00006830672,0.0000095061,0.00041753592,0.9635716,0.000036482543,0.00033183966,0.010914629,0.0011717508,0.008600804],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000033184854,0.000051228075,0.014606434,0.000118055075,0.000007535531,0.00034581276,0.96635365,0.00004172207,0.00033390662,0.0018000375,0.01631497,0.000023305249],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011040982,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01601415,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9979647,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009274956,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007612603,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.067294836},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4299317727","doi":"10.3138/jsp.39.4.323","title":"Authorial Ethics: How Writers Abuse Their Calling","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Carelessness; Biomedicine; Misconduct; Sociology; Scientific misconduct; Psychology; Law; Political science; Medicine","score_opus":0.11633681026487577,"score_gpt":0.3203336666959573,"score_spread":0.20399685643108154,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4299317727","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.30584905,0.008791893,0.04271389,0.20764291,0.0054977057,0.00015684239,0.0000642959,0.0009627715,0.42832068],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94836867,0.0012670674,0.003219983,0.017163746,0.0008675055,0.00010258553,0.000029380093,0.0007805878,0.028200546],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.86582124,0.10676532,0.002828314,0.0040387893,0.015483848,0.005062507],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8484104,0.100527324,0.014606054,0.014833399,0.016118968,0.00550381],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.044114098,0.00092243985,0.0011732801,0.0040188176,0.04530704,0.03575652,0.004168793,0.013804975,0.0058134026],"category_scores_gemma":[0.18776833,0.0011279833,0.0008594594,0.0034935607,0.05881561,0.024726892,0.02075582,0.019642383,0.0032082512],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004435581,0.00003872252,0.0016794434,0.000085675994,0.000017419585,0.0006892425,0.78942895,0.00007359366,0.00033776235,0.173954,0.018995281,0.014655493],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003457284,0.00005513982,0.00087991374,0.0007750848,0.000037563343,0.0015221842,0.51522833,0.00072664476,0.001033569,0.107863985,0.37175605,0.0000869915],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038138437,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035637533,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.986195,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008016763,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00854905,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23330045},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4299513045","doi":"","title":"Cosmetovigilance and Global Approaches","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"DergiPark (Istanbul University)","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.03385463288398703,"score_gpt":0.23432102010800257,"score_spread":0.20046638722401555,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4299513045","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07541626,0.031176906,0.11809504,0.11861918,0.0014617428,0.00039624603,0.0003300353,0.0003944581,0.65411013],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94090825,0.009942207,0.024102977,0.008496032,0.0006763206,0.0002570116,0.00013907749,0.00007326988,0.015404903],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9900456,0.007090843,0.00029470294,0.000950886,0.0012391611,0.00037878047],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99121726,0.004588152,0.0011300191,0.0010066512,0.0015278357,0.0005301268],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010021434,0.0005786557,0.000400403,0.00418087,0.0017530116,0.00704417,0.0012262271,0.0019370533,0.0069657844],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012593639,0.00022874953,0.0003908799,0.0028898434,0.011653593,0.0044797934,0.0057169856,0.0027717196,0.00052140316],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000056500336,0.00007233011,0.010004237,0.00050441595,0.00011346789,0.00055206276,0.014722991,0.0020013512,0.00027306838,0.7894895,0.0088342205,0.17337573],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023225915,0.00015559517,0.011696262,0.0013786994,0.00008147595,0.0007631694,0.025344886,0.0035779863,0.00047379802,0.68613046,0.2703216,0.00005290074],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0039248047,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027076812,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010021434,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005483267,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0045209555,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05299902},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4304471806","doi":"10.1016/j.jecp.2022.105566","title":"Academic cheating interferes with learning among middle school children","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Child Psychology","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Cheating; Psychology; Test (biology); Naturalism; Developmental psychology; Naturalistic observation; Social psychology; Academic achievement; Mathematics education","score_opus":0.024610111672265966,"score_gpt":0.34300190882142206,"score_spread":0.3183917971491561,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4304471806","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9992987,0.000028643655,0.000007761698,0.000026922751,0.0000015000473,0.000002391901,0.0000127583935,0.0000033531778,0.0006179287],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9997042,0.00002529116,0.000021321697,0.0000110862,0.0000020327727,0.0000024739156,0.000019662953,0.0000024818437,0.00021144788],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.998538,0.00038439574,0.00016160023,0.00014148973,0.00044705163,0.00032739234],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97906727,0.0059119794,0.010196662,0.0014658504,0.0015315274,0.0018266566],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013510166,0.000333288,0.000439146,0.0015844338,0.00126537,0.0016380324,0.0008898315,0.00082013564,0.0029647057],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018606605,0.0003296426,0.00036531058,0.001051695,0.0015076272,0.00083431357,0.0010478636,0.0014393561,0.0004663946],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00049979263,0.0008765818,0.98642564,0.00003929635,0.000036247056,0.0005374794,0.003273475,0.000064427906,0.0017577809,0.00020497516,0.00020336568,0.0060809944],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000951853,0.00021748843,0.99630946,0.000011009711,0.000016363841,0.00036687753,0.0021269664,0.000097265634,0.0005696428,0.000120575845,0.00014770585,0.0000071334357],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007608195,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007144883,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007608195,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009694684,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012242064,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.015127838},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4308314465","doi":"10.1007/s10639-022-11365-1","title":"Developing a comprehensive plagiarism assessment rubric","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Education and Information Technologies","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Rubric; Likert scale; Psychology; Categorization; Paraphrase; Mathematics education; Writing assessment; Plagiarism detection; Computer science; Medical education; Medicine; Information retrieval; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.023286801803039932,"score_gpt":0.328594484222961,"score_spread":0.30530768241992107,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4308314465","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.027613891,0.0006999214,0.86799943,0.003342227,0.0007031971,0.007827013,0.0031132502,0.02789087,0.06081023],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.06256867,0.0004595343,0.89786845,0.000489893,0.00014146912,0.0020233071,0.0046671974,0.001915245,0.029866245],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9828919,0.0037043092,0.0033149906,0.0009679815,0.008535446,0.0005853829],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.91549945,0.011073914,0.004770748,0.006480879,0.06001143,0.002163571],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014775345,0.00117571,0.000989914,0.014746713,0.0029264395,0.004944339,0.0022452446,0.0013556574,0.011240152],"category_scores_gemma":[0.066011325,0.0009647558,0.0011416211,0.0035418777,0.00093704363,0.0052962704,0.005915332,0.0025222625,0.010223071],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007843104,0.00038818462,0.008256695,0.0011512691,0.000047318987,0.00031158983,0.0023411901,0.0028794426,0.01694985,0.012733863,0.08784147,0.8670208],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010319565,0.0007082011,0.034563713,0.0033922743,0.00021133403,0.0030393337,0.006817995,0.069532335,0.081858374,0.03317822,0.7660117,0.0005832535],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0056844917,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010570933,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99864435,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021888784,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009185397,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07814044},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["research_integrity"],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"methods","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"domain":"methods","study_design":"design_other","genre":"methods","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W4310004579","doi":"10.2234/foo.bar","title":"Get help from us if you need to buy NCLEX-RN / PN License online [whatsapp: +40701109757]","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Live streaming; Advertising; Geography; Business; Computer science; Multimedia","score_opus":0.03870729543076251,"score_gpt":0.28476563776767216,"score_spread":0.24605834233690965,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4310004579","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0011350345,0.00040709978,0.0038562496,0.008710276,0.0032224564,0.0009094051,0.010211235,0.04283649,0.9287117],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0016528347,0.00029515612,0.0019055086,0.002267066,0.00035277437,0.00035156144,0.0032639932,0.007496799,0.9824143],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99861395,0.00016903346,0.00010255244,0.00016624613,0.0007204103,0.00022777416],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98586607,0.0017334287,0.0006679379,0.0015952502,0.005019005,0.0051184013],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014795356,0.0013743785,0.0011105145,0.002277192,0.0025562686,0.005174855,0.0020146356,0.003140475,0.9542857],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018914267,0.000783013,0.00063801586,0.0018194562,0.0007302406,0.0066664773,0.005274302,0.0025237352,0.9447067],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010964426,0.000017989847,0.00004781443,0.00003402393,4.2073208e-7,0.000023856073,0.000028578133,0.00000526111,0.000057438196,0.00015810327,0.97915936,0.020456096],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000116514075,0.000018752171,0.0003246309,0.00006556326,0.0000014298022,0.00010645156,0.00018378452,0.000052615742,0.00023526403,0.00040022182,0.9985868,0.000012953226],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005279631,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009663068,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04571432,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017915402,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027595744,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06520593},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4310102553","doi":"10.29173/iasl8548","title":"Academic Integrity Policy and Instruction in K-12 schools in Australia, Canada, England and the United States","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"IASL Annual Conference Proceedings","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scope (computer science); Academic integrity; Political science; Literacy; Medical education; Mathematics education; Pedagogy; Psychology; Medicine; Library science; Computer science","score_opus":0.03339851425578779,"score_gpt":0.30649959515383984,"score_spread":0.2731010808980521,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4310102553","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97767293,0.0009307096,0.00013182223,0.004737158,0.000019544317,0.000055372635,0.00018052294,0.000019926754,0.016251976],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99489623,0.0004571457,0.0002260904,0.00042695316,0.0000040482246,0.00001943971,0.00008505367,0.000004883958,0.0038803134],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9931585,0.0014607081,0.00046821963,0.00052034896,0.0019900217,0.0024021142],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9727017,0.003364819,0.0051679425,0.000696217,0.009699309,0.008370016],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042202002,0.000103312144,0.00033304215,0.0023192016,0.008581079,0.004993281,0.0012236439,0.00074062985,0.0026654217],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01788054,0.00033875444,0.00015955567,0.004245655,0.0036950589,0.001967257,0.0031854438,0.0016440691,0.00032059004],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027187847,0.00049518957,0.76704705,0.00044851948,0.000035909507,0.0007787989,0.09325057,0.0005760323,0.0009177264,0.017529558,0.0059560477,0.11269271],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014944575,0.00011919701,0.9082278,0.00025988134,0.000010446774,0.00011682689,0.065455936,0.00037353102,0.0004144785,0.0007033258,0.024265336,0.000038260445],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9362667,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9584794,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99925935,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.047479916,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.11785238,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3444925},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4312565931","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-12680-2_5","title":"Leveraging College Copyright Ownership Against File-Sharing and Contract Cheating Websites","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba; University of Calgary; Assiniboine Community College","funders":"","keywords":"Cheating; Academic integrity; File sharing; Reputation; Leverage (statistics); Misconduct; Framing (construction); Copyright infringement; Academic dishonesty; Copying; Internet privacy; Business; The Internet; World Wide Web; Computer science; Political science; Law; Engineering; Library science; Psychology","score_opus":0.03931286260322881,"score_gpt":0.2690168979898697,"score_spread":0.22970403538664091,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4312565931","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.31755152,0.002955802,0.08111112,0.0096703,0.00039871206,0.0002475586,0.00021244594,0.0027377675,0.5851147],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95614463,0.0005132172,0.0062424815,0.00035858,0.00012971026,0.00003667953,0.00008143175,0.00020290243,0.036290277],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99591523,0.0007812961,0.00012450517,0.00037707025,0.0020779024,0.0007239783],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9685704,0.013710005,0.0026146981,0.010650753,0.0028539367,0.0016003012],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042951955,0.00036193166,0.0004351097,0.0023168405,0.0028411436,0.008701898,0.0019893055,0.0020724395,0.012818547],"category_scores_gemma":[0.034078695,0.00031654403,0.00041705987,0.002338106,0.003254065,0.0104254,0.0056826947,0.0032947154,0.0025219051],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022542193,0.00093919976,0.014877845,0.00014493968,0.000054056647,0.0004367926,0.0037113284,0.008349884,0.0047232755,0.31648836,0.03028924,0.6197597],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013193794,0.00055188884,0.016596703,0.0006732259,0.00023153887,0.0017320866,0.007755722,0.21273042,0.051114712,0.43745345,0.27080292,0.00022542612],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0047207614,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005806415,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99792755,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002285085,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038985168,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.042882323},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4313036598","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-12680-2","title":"Contract Cheating in Higher Education","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Assiniboine Community College; University of Manitoba; University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Cheating; Business; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.04163114012021338,"score_gpt":0.32916185636547723,"score_spread":0.28753071624526383,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4313036598","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0013131446,0.0049626864,0.0017095987,0.007249798,0.0004862111,0.00001537966,0.000020226269,0.000025666954,0.9842173],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.048677657,0.0029111516,0.0005208639,0.0021530096,0.0006627548,0.000043753458,0.000025360112,0.000059427166,0.944946],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987399,0.0003867264,0.000032900974,0.00009945007,0.0005770901,0.00016401408],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99821293,0.0011286287,0.0000881054,0.00018655721,0.0002619075,0.00012196464],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014850384,0.00046558236,0.00047321877,0.00092265167,0.0044630123,0.0054630223,0.0010948281,0.0056109834,0.026805375],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005388346,0.000347578,0.00027656497,0.0015282712,0.006533645,0.0055175987,0.0020065191,0.0052103,0.006682465],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000071058416,0.00002060788,0.0001320069,0.000024180617,0.0000018943209,0.00004378001,0.00074020494,0.00022612045,0.00003054647,0.81890506,0.15046807,0.02940046],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008896422,0.000017481936,0.0007369958,0.00018933548,0.0000041822095,0.00016366325,0.00085190486,0.0009860457,0.00012658873,0.47995347,0.5169468,0.000014769119],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014609318,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.028737286,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99851495,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0054436596,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0044403854,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08967292},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4313360125","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-16976-2","title":"Academic Integrity: Broadening Practices, Technologies, and the Role of Students","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Ethics and integrity in educational contexts","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Universität Konstanz; Universidade do Porto; Deakin University; University of Wollongong; Swansea University; Imperial College London; Université du Québec en Outaouais; University of Leeds; University of Derby; University of Nicosia; Rīgas Tehniskā Universitāte; Coventry University; Univerza v Mariboru; University of Northampton; Oxford Brookes University; Helsingin Yliopisto; University of Southern Queensland; City University of Hong Kong","keywords":"Academic integrity; Political science; Business; Engineering ethics; Engineering","score_opus":0.06557327742908904,"score_gpt":0.41228749894700717,"score_spread":0.34671422151791814,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4313360125","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014621432,0.024223965,0.015231235,0.10058635,0.0013408057,0.000054528988,0.000030395951,0.0001787473,0.84373254],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6742928,0.012938779,0.0056806863,0.011228092,0.0014243342,0.00016863177,0.000037480535,0.00024044972,0.29398873],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98997736,0.0067081642,0.00024019503,0.00051418075,0.001992093,0.0005679867],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9818819,0.012108472,0.0010222489,0.0019255788,0.0017026899,0.0013590949],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007328937,0.0004091304,0.00042711527,0.0012984044,0.007726752,0.019775419,0.0014666554,0.0053629423,0.0076499744],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0214797,0.00026180863,0.00026445385,0.0016513153,0.040188022,0.019771134,0.008159648,0.008014355,0.002292449],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000058474284,0.000020334695,0.00026878697,0.000049009956,0.0000018451273,0.00005202297,0.02238391,0.00006611302,0.000079483594,0.92453545,0.022218375,0.030318746],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004231784,0.00002289525,0.00063916435,0.00037842846,0.00000413923,0.000253203,0.018261662,0.00021166661,0.00048998534,0.5905172,0.3892015,0.000015942009],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023131808,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033928468,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9946371,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0043700496,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008093007,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03875959},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4313366520","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-16922-9_6","title":"Starting from a Place of Academic Integrity: Building Trust with Online Students","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Ethics and integrity in educational contexts","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Academic integrity; Formative assessment; Class (philosophy); Punitive damages; Online course; Work (physics); Online learning; Space (punctuation); Mathematics education; Focus (optics); Psychology; Engineering ethics; Computer science; Pedagogy; Engineering; World Wide Web; Political science","score_opus":0.08231776926750739,"score_gpt":0.405387443754204,"score_spread":0.3230696744866966,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4313366520","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.057061624,0.004032632,0.029049708,0.09429006,0.0014472458,0.0000702611,0.00003475295,0.00018461475,0.8138291],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.73281014,0.002329584,0.012831238,0.009598525,0.0004431489,0.00008648654,0.000040882507,0.00030455636,0.24155541],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966762,0.0020476636,0.00007111052,0.00018859246,0.0006418197,0.00037456298],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.993028,0.0027316534,0.0005568665,0.00068930315,0.00094303227,0.0020512054],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038236661,0.0002846786,0.0002445159,0.00063008757,0.009106487,0.016404225,0.001140173,0.0034417752,0.012641781],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009460143,0.00027756533,0.00027950018,0.00080321135,0.013246922,0.025424117,0.011447182,0.009199195,0.00390538],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021801736,0.00017376301,0.0020743378,0.00009419154,0.0000075220723,0.00030360927,0.15686284,0.00017059984,0.00040911665,0.6546036,0.068544276,0.11673432],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000068777426,0.00005388447,0.0013425858,0.0004549315,0.0000082813995,0.000448322,0.11157357,0.00054636993,0.0009298445,0.3456244,0.53898203,0.000028858098],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024548967,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005347751,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016404225,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031814491,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0064971284,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.042290986},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4313366584","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-16922-9_1","title":"Ethics in Teacher Training: An Overview","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Ethics and integrity in educational contexts","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Training (meteorology); Medical education; Psychology; Pedagogy; Mathematics education; Engineering ethics; Geography; Engineering; Medicine; Meteorology","score_opus":0.2940200463575872,"score_gpt":0.4520516851419079,"score_spread":0.1580316387843207,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4313366584","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0012402814,0.78764576,0.008864217,0.0074114287,0.0017381398,0.00008240061,0.00005274816,0.00006046603,0.19290449],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.027339576,0.80254817,0.0076403064,0.005031482,0.004038946,0.00031441078,0.00011897562,0.0001020031,0.15286621],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990577,0.00043301456,0.000065956,0.0000740067,0.00026517452,0.00010405747],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991418,0.00062668405,0.000040184827,0.00002145162,0.00011273629,0.000057153713],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001163505,0.0009608398,0.0009260186,0.004159551,0.0019038989,0.0058201225,0.00086824776,0.004451933,0.0064245067],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010786457,0.0006409724,0.00044519827,0.0048048203,0.0048129396,0.0057335594,0.0023570433,0.0045816693,0.002445646],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019783152,0.00019961878,0.00027900113,0.0024139655,0.000016513182,0.0002716048,0.0046932814,0.0012730176,0.0004693561,0.6076186,0.1348834,0.24786182],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000045192824,0.000029098164,0.0006029372,0.0020256762,0.000004440985,0.0004217049,0.00094906596,0.0002586375,0.00008555934,0.08300748,0.912597,0.0000138869955],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037908705,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0077742036,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0064245067,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00434345,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038514484,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03151411},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4313366600","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-16922-9_8","title":"Formalising Preservice Teacher Training to Work with Parents to Promote Academic Integrity in K-12 Education","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Ethics and integrity in educational contexts","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Academic integrity; Training (meteorology); Work (physics); Medical education; Pedagogy; Mathematics education; Medicine; Engineering; Social psychology; Geography","score_opus":0.11560761957102916,"score_gpt":0.3935464343981011,"score_spread":0.27793881482707194,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4313366600","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.035309877,0.004156178,0.0076874853,0.01519647,0.00075253233,0.00010654324,0.000028342045,0.0001364264,0.9366262],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.339618,0.0040704333,0.015461175,0.0030651125,0.00011638316,0.00013299094,0.000058909285,0.00011702612,0.63736],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992366,0.00031840362,0.000030409026,0.00007121111,0.00019461972,0.0001487975],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99837947,0.00058992393,0.00014583995,0.00014180873,0.0003093252,0.00043362033],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012587437,0.00020366568,0.00014430664,0.00027029894,0.0038393454,0.005050623,0.0008472016,0.0014542713,0.011356504],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002932479,0.00021846485,0.00016297182,0.00037987204,0.0029456138,0.003976836,0.0031970916,0.00384365,0.0032444166],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028788287,0.0004090663,0.0033767677,0.00040491464,0.000004605203,0.000389945,0.083983466,0.00034893557,0.0011464182,0.31329072,0.12750871,0.46910763],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009968525,0.00009358497,0.0074918903,0.0014644396,0.000008094135,0.0007894659,0.06037384,0.0003419082,0.0020546266,0.08221069,0.84513456,0.000026864036],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0076512774,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.032479893,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011356504,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026235487,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009705437,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.037991285},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4313372631","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-16976-2_11","title":"Data Mining of Online Quiz Log Files: Creation of Automated Tools for Identification of Possible Academic Misconduct in a Large STEM Course","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Ethics and integrity in educational contexts","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Academic integrity; Misconduct; Cheating; Computer science; Identification (biology); Duration (music); Collusion; Computer security; Internet privacy; World Wide Web; Psychology; Business; Political science; Social psychology","score_opus":0.20181325194482239,"score_gpt":0.45268731281967095,"score_spread":0.25087406087484854,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4313372631","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.76488775,0.0014537383,0.080527745,0.0020528962,0.00023710904,0.001285386,0.11142297,0.02543873,0.012693771],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6772961,0.000642534,0.20060891,0.000352867,0.00013746586,0.0011212551,0.107832916,0.00060489454,0.011402959],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985115,0.0002697256,0.00018982997,0.00034321207,0.0005799896,0.00010564219],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98839426,0.007249229,0.0012544744,0.0010822167,0.0016040673,0.00041567112],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018969037,0.0006732839,0.0004631719,0.0070523066,0.0007294974,0.0023243432,0.0012448379,0.00094234163,0.0024644134],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01061375,0.00027346006,0.0004521723,0.004200883,0.00037240316,0.0018824018,0.0014242112,0.0009310135,0.0038723436],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00046690024,0.0014816199,0.21701716,0.00076882803,0.00012524982,0.0008334701,0.0015429994,0.0027515544,0.013670423,0.0019498515,0.068205036,0.6911869],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000120514145,0.00076063845,0.50137794,0.00060402177,0.0002554464,0.0021939806,0.0053532785,0.30247757,0.07831632,0.016599994,0.09167903,0.0002613443],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0051981662,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010992441,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99905765,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000594233,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015747164,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.010335863},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4313892317","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-21796-8_12","title":"Are You for Real? Lessons for the Academy About Professors with Fake or Fraudulent Degrees","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Ethics and integrity in educational contexts","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University; University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Credential; Reputation; Public relations; Outrage; Academic integrity; Quality (philosophy); Business; Audit; Computer security; Accounting; Political science; Computer science; Engineering ethics; Engineering; Law","score_opus":0.2880839787950291,"score_gpt":0.4593668505306426,"score_spread":0.17128287173561346,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4313892317","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005582431,0.022038728,0.0016193424,0.8586721,0.00668422,0.000020640873,0.00002347156,0.00007685804,0.10528227],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.31767258,0.038124666,0.0052374746,0.31439003,0.009215,0.00012418383,0.00007155721,0.00034540903,0.31481922],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9892385,0.0067469846,0.00024284059,0.00045809319,0.0021190508,0.0011945899],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97766894,0.013326769,0.0010894656,0.0010438422,0.0026425633,0.0042282906],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0140215,0.0006098514,0.00078979897,0.0014719204,0.016007435,0.024965394,0.002041925,0.012306813,0.012681888],"category_scores_gemma":[0.041892756,0.0004577706,0.0008137453,0.0012358533,0.027380686,0.033957947,0.008324516,0.024288693,0.0045725163],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003253389,0.0001208933,0.0009463173,0.00011636388,0.00001818575,0.00088246056,0.048615467,0.0001425277,0.00011471452,0.28575757,0.5810923,0.08216075],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002120733,0.000041125637,0.0005682793,0.0006908954,0.000012078318,0.0010863472,0.077496886,0.00015249995,0.00013000335,0.251532,0.668223,0.000045650617],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0050617633,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01676475,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9876932,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007902822,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010478362,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07415366},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4313892337","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-21796-8_1","title":"Fake Degrees and Credential Fraud, Contract Cheating, and Paper Mills: Overview and Historical Perspectives","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Ethics and integrity in educational contexts","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University; University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Credential; Cheating; Valuation (finance); Vendor; Business; Certification; Academic integrity; Accounting; Computer security; Political science; Marketing; Computer science; Engineering; Law; Engineering ethics; Psychology","score_opus":0.12429868100780203,"score_gpt":0.38047859091668446,"score_spread":0.2561799099088824,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4313892337","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009779238,0.61636907,0.0054612653,0.039639406,0.0013485379,0.00003742537,0.00004995327,0.000033113967,0.32728195],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.33121186,0.51840353,0.0039391033,0.012155297,0.0069343625,0.00014741978,0.00009208909,0.00007369179,0.12704262],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970687,0.0014378998,0.00013769403,0.000291654,0.00071865105,0.0003454791],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99257046,0.0059369183,0.0005771548,0.00025503946,0.00044603323,0.0002143316],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003492998,0.00059872045,0.00076521316,0.0061514494,0.0038255174,0.014364346,0.0015388062,0.009896274,0.006204005],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006104895,0.0005337511,0.00038071894,0.008389478,0.029967956,0.01426596,0.0042818156,0.0074433614,0.0009153294],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005722531,0.00002095152,0.00022579938,0.00013165011,0.0000017458426,0.000069637885,0.0030740977,0.0001158764,0.000023777187,0.96711236,0.0059627327,0.023255555],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000053688655,0.000028396396,0.0018602436,0.0017879743,0.0000062100703,0.00077472604,0.00705074,0.00041953335,0.00017873682,0.39958158,0.58827776,0.000028760898],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003864131,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005365741,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9901037,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0074715265,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00462065,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.054210007},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4313892441","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-21796-8_13","title":"Fake Degrees and Fraudulent Credentials in Higher Education: Conclusions and Future Directions","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Ethics and integrity in educational contexts","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary; Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Credential; Terminology; Action (physics); Public relations; Political science; Institution; Engineering ethics; Key (lock); Sociology; Engineering; Computer science; Computer security; Law; Linguistics","score_opus":0.10472998839309139,"score_gpt":0.38625738706080126,"score_spread":0.28152739866770987,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4313892441","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04957148,0.18623313,0.0089688515,0.20917776,0.0022186788,0.00009903718,0.00019284582,0.00004500391,0.5434933],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6988357,0.13356481,0.005017918,0.013241926,0.0030115347,0.00012918093,0.00016641713,0.000039136758,0.14599341],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982822,0.00093847467,0.000048153568,0.00016056166,0.00032623796,0.00024436848],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9876408,0.009641686,0.000574599,0.00040694184,0.001226965,0.0005090767],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035881498,0.0004816614,0.00077576574,0.0023111457,0.0030389228,0.013173915,0.0016096752,0.00473478,0.021506932],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0068211434,0.0003182734,0.000431764,0.004736553,0.012947081,0.014275531,0.003116131,0.0038055787,0.00095471536],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030407224,0.00010942607,0.0024976106,0.00027226034,0.000008288688,0.00024944183,0.0035837505,0.00028284718,0.00004204216,0.9184632,0.017548142,0.056912646],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002100676,0.00004434084,0.008935863,0.0021204113,0.000027515207,0.0005815251,0.035927076,0.0013288051,0.00020978603,0.84373635,0.10702513,0.000042204654],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008817208,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019234259,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99526525,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0060887486,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0072262785,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07194787},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4313892473","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-21796-8_2","title":"Admissions Fraud in Canadian Higher Education","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Ethics and integrity in educational contexts","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary; Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Blues; Credential; Globe; Argument (complex analysis); Newspaper; Political science; Fact sheet; Public relations; Quality (philosophy); Psychology; Public administration; History; Medicine; Law","score_opus":0.10322800029726954,"score_gpt":0.3993635820789929,"score_spread":0.2961355817817234,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4313892473","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15171564,0.037917506,0.0010215027,0.25386703,0.0027949498,0.00014387656,0.0007512361,0.00009224879,0.551696],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.73951674,0.01349842,0.000595883,0.0129597485,0.00063581916,0.000047371275,0.00022662032,0.00006705378,0.23245233],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9859542,0.0022661139,0.00037605464,0.00060265674,0.005328922,0.005471957],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98207754,0.004318597,0.0011100607,0.0004309354,0.007057517,0.005005338],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0065478235,0.00049367675,0.00060839974,0.006916148,0.035355005,0.015738033,0.00340411,0.008903213,0.01199116],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025757939,0.00059581205,0.0008513854,0.012075882,0.013492855,0.0036342407,0.004564965,0.009433866,0.0007911681],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000053194046,0.000093516,0.015533925,0.000170851,0.000018880044,0.0008042659,0.029562399,0.00155053,0.000066117645,0.6514713,0.22575371,0.074921265],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000036722817,0.00004191966,0.08366427,0.0010944407,0.00005424362,0.0007183917,0.054856535,0.002836716,0.00025793794,0.056020413,0.80018103,0.00023738462],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9947968,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9970059,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9910968,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.27749956,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.39168486,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8379981},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4315486952","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-21796-8","title":"Fake Degrees and Fraudulent Credentials in Higher Education","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Ethics and integrity in educational contexts","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University; University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Credential; Cheating; Certification; Computer security; Academic integrity; Internet privacy; Business; Medical education; Psychology; Computer science; Political science; Medicine; Law; Social psychology","score_opus":0.13574953844798415,"score_gpt":0.40920445716297577,"score_spread":0.2734549187149916,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4315486952","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017587695,0.027520277,0.003551638,0.042495415,0.0010035383,0.00002705916,0.000032967208,0.000030074383,0.9077513],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5297477,0.018138845,0.0013434403,0.0051553533,0.0019647789,0.00005972141,0.000037988724,0.00004540524,0.4435068],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99816567,0.0009227425,0.00005451384,0.00011588201,0.000550417,0.00019081168],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99133414,0.007090331,0.00046996726,0.00034165243,0.0004874984,0.00027646677],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021073571,0.00034546474,0.00036246583,0.0013686579,0.003573231,0.007838367,0.00065465167,0.0056904918,0.00993701],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010223631,0.00030585093,0.0001705004,0.001462447,0.012460228,0.007847056,0.002340255,0.00448592,0.0013944814],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009468358,0.00002844787,0.00072582584,0.000039283826,0.0000022386182,0.00018281284,0.002747317,0.00023360834,0.000034396624,0.9220004,0.04620229,0.02779386],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007292807,0.000018175173,0.0026166409,0.0003380317,0.0000057751627,0.0007677954,0.0038397517,0.0008506615,0.00013831895,0.85242265,0.13898045,0.000014488632],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035620013,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008640595,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9943095,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031763662,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026265287,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.033242643},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4315752830","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0280018","title":"“The person in power told me to”—European PhD students’ perspectives on guest authorship and good authorship practice","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PLoS ONE","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ottawa Hospital","funders":"Horizon 2020; European Commission","keywords":"Power (physics); Inclusion (mineral); Publishing; Attribution; Quality (philosophy); Psychology; Medical education; Political science; Medicine; Social psychology; Epistemology; Law","score_opus":0.13385946425264764,"score_gpt":0.34426956556941907,"score_spread":0.21041010131677143,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4315752830","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95926803,0.003447788,0.0016531432,0.020041315,0.00044207278,0.00002799595,0.0000310195,0.000015501728,0.015073121],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99568,0.0006578707,0.00018788112,0.0024379087,0.00006605771,0.000011549465,0.00001050432,0.0000101969745,0.00093802874],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9518334,0.035611458,0.0024657298,0.0023506158,0.0041656503,0.0035731213],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.89508826,0.06513057,0.013347106,0.0042731534,0.0065029617,0.015657894],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05905566,0.00044627264,0.0010599727,0.0022309823,0.010708619,0.021553732,0.0013595019,0.0045045805,0.0039738454],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08499778,0.00063890027,0.0007072378,0.0020674455,0.021368539,0.013585012,0.014660665,0.006910746,0.0005514564],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001308819,0.000058174886,0.02545971,0.00014510051,0.000035072455,0.000824349,0.95021325,0.000047488706,0.0005792165,0.009774736,0.0014948429,0.011237308],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028564546,0.00009608493,0.010178958,0.00035330394,0.000018880068,0.00094775413,0.9585284,0.00011993516,0.00030442796,0.0035434107,0.025817798,0.00006256504],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029694524,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002050083,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99549544,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0040029977,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005528174,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31231987},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4317488778","doi":"10.1016/j.wem.2022.09.005","title":"Practical Guidance for Crafting Original Research Manuscripts","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Wilderness and Environmental Medicine","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval; Hôtel-Dieu de Québec; Cégep de Lévis","funders":"","keywords":"CLARITY; Presentation (obstetrics); Novelty; Relevance (law); Engineering ethics; Product (mathematics); Element (criminal law); Computer science; Section (typography); Scope (computer science); Balance (ability); Management science; Data science; Psychology; Political science; Engineering; Law; Medicine; Social psychology","score_opus":0.15764905384526554,"score_gpt":0.43631857150023656,"score_spread":0.27866951765497106,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4317488778","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"reporting","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":"reporting","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008107354,0.008811911,0.4579817,0.23215836,0.04445786,0.07650747,0.00578464,0.066848725,0.09934203],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.007330943,0.0049366876,0.8620747,0.021172907,0.011881645,0.03490671,0.001982692,0.005149111,0.050564647],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.77368647,0.13504444,0.041643497,0.006616068,0.039683577,0.0033258798],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.34927285,0.3310984,0.046255574,0.06868038,0.18293677,0.021756086],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.19958654,0.00529472,0.004360635,0.021727618,0.0066908253,0.013463646,0.007694693,0.019797327,0.12073525],"category_scores_gemma":[0.513769,0.004954648,0.0042983,0.009841024,0.009224145,0.01614835,0.009345334,0.018159112,0.16770521],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00045918836,0.0005628181,0.0004995511,0.0022713519,0.000054748056,0.0017522379,0.0056499424,0.0005877712,0.004354774,0.0052002077,0.8016041,0.17700331],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00074963947,0.0005326371,0.0023768279,0.00521463,0.00004454959,0.00304735,0.00453798,0.0020402768,0.0026055577,0.024951335,0.9534953,0.0004038321],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002370777,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0065457583,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8004135,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036284092,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.028188018,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9870523},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4317706999","doi":"10.21432/cjlt28388","title":"The Academic Integrity Technological Arms Race and its Impact on Learning, Teaching, and Assessment","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Cheating; Academic integrity; Arms race; Misconduct; Silver bullet; Race (biology); Mathematics education; Academic achievement; Psychology; Higher education; Engineering ethics; Pedagogy; Sociology; Political science; Engineering; Social psychology","score_opus":0.022415253872102504,"score_gpt":0.3591613815483187,"score_spread":0.3367461276762162,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4317706999","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06580694,0.018771477,0.018836763,0.5342686,0.0017001128,0.00006333762,0.0000481488,0.00011421524,0.3603904],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95070165,0.005420714,0.0035339962,0.024845563,0.0011813289,0.00008560496,0.000013301683,0.00008015579,0.014137623],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9068226,0.048531737,0.0024580834,0.004140469,0.032957017,0.0050899675],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.78725225,0.14458151,0.023625033,0.014827948,0.021407692,0.008305528],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0478346,0.00043847755,0.00073077105,0.003902519,0.021272792,0.02398434,0.002416989,0.010700959,0.008226351],"category_scores_gemma":[0.15281062,0.0005558491,0.00055987237,0.0030770295,0.09577031,0.02008895,0.020012908,0.016294543,0.001345453],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029729257,0.00004494767,0.0029746927,0.000082007566,0.000014124986,0.00020546197,0.025407767,0.00025344372,0.00015138132,0.9191012,0.010068886,0.041666478],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022880538,0.00010899259,0.005939681,0.0009297096,0.000024355693,0.0008433837,0.026304731,0.0006910185,0.0009991151,0.7449753,0.21903867,0.00012208629],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010882266,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010841569,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98929906,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015106021,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019001666,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2529766},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4319461790","doi":"10.1111/cdev.13910","title":"Cheating among elementary school children: A machine learning approach","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Child Development","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Rehabilitation Institute; University of Toronto","funders":"Ministry of Education of the People's Republic of China; National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Cheating; Psychology; Mathematics education; Primary education; Developmental psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.015926604580758248,"score_gpt":0.2615858023946594,"score_spread":0.24565919781390114,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4319461790","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96928966,0.0006391243,0.025785511,0.0010159127,0.000019003728,0.000198894,0.00078374014,0.00010446988,0.0021636067],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98517483,0.00018319485,0.01377387,0.000032572618,0.000021841042,0.00008752469,0.00038620946,0.0000052185364,0.00033475674],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.99834585,0.0009824962,0.00011573183,0.00026516177,0.00014200657,0.00014888222],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9876836,0.009787942,0.0012716695,0.00041160264,0.0005678351,0.00027723867],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003339423,0.0006493008,0.0005739374,0.005655654,0.0008050324,0.0017252194,0.000807434,0.00075324124,0.0015545957],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010877659,0.00028138224,0.0009140653,0.0027794773,0.00067023106,0.0012865082,0.00086135895,0.001998656,0.0003101202],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011276115,0.0005444615,0.8984688,0.000095892094,0.00020878807,0.00013739931,0.0009736768,0.008471872,0.00036148974,0.0016241549,0.0007330822,0.08826763],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013661019,0.00034562085,0.52337694,0.000121414254,0.0001236777,0.00020449956,0.0028737495,0.4641864,0.00059983676,0.0070377565,0.0010682759,0.00004818282],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010230412,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011356943,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010230412,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013626569,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00096907077,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.020341754},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4323526371","doi":"10.1145/3545947.3569609","title":"Who's Cheating Whom","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Cheating; Misconduct; Punitive damages; Focus (optics); Psychology; Academic integrity; Narrative; Medical education; Social psychology; Political science; Medicine; Law","score_opus":0.023528189818993846,"score_gpt":0.30534244872277755,"score_spread":0.2818142589037837,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4323526371","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.28166372,0.00715686,0.017198507,0.23905689,0.0062184324,0.00021484395,0.0009206506,0.0013450793,0.44622505],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.78517824,0.0054007415,0.0043394812,0.030259704,0.0012289704,0.000080298276,0.00034031103,0.00052088575,0.1726514],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99207956,0.0028837007,0.0005026362,0.00081355503,0.0025447235,0.0011758386],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97677964,0.0047677127,0.0044418653,0.003074772,0.007803769,0.0031322546],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0063508293,0.00038525456,0.0007247529,0.0015457981,0.006163396,0.0069896327,0.0008446243,0.0023593327,0.023737121],"category_scores_gemma":[0.039335784,0.00029596276,0.0006608649,0.0011731744,0.0027985398,0.007202007,0.002340658,0.0036483814,0.010409218],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014153599,0.0002339655,0.13069056,0.000504543,0.00022015674,0.0029179929,0.10053319,0.00027292836,0.00435985,0.04755191,0.29467782,0.41789556],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015732081,0.00019062914,0.038706012,0.0013688554,0.00021560794,0.009722407,0.13864468,0.0012693136,0.005713963,0.02440808,0.77954555,0.00019914361],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004732623,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0069200695,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99764067,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002127763,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030755028,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.079408646},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4323568189","doi":"10.1080/10508422.2023.2187804","title":"Grey zones and good practice: A European survey of academic integrity among undergraduate students","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics & Behavior","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ottawa Hospital","funders":"Horizon 2020; European Commission","keywords":"Academic integrity; Psychology; Research integrity; Mathematics education; Medical education; Engineering ethics; Engineering; Social psychology; Medicine","score_opus":0.14553071609079649,"score_gpt":0.45814760995173953,"score_spread":0.31261689386094305,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4323568189","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9989573,0.00009273985,0.00007952298,0.00016962814,0.0000026255461,0.0000144415235,0.000040974715,0.0000022998008,0.00064038386],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995832,0.00007385372,0.00006948974,0.00007811921,0.0000023785815,0.0000091972715,0.00003184061,0.0000013796086,0.0001505902],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9925344,0.0037628885,0.00105063,0.00048244707,0.0015404598,0.00062908593],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9551721,0.01423365,0.018863987,0.0024552378,0.0044548567,0.004820152],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009726064,0.000209282,0.00047407864,0.002003606,0.000885853,0.0022543438,0.00062817393,0.0013342649,0.0016814877],"category_scores_gemma":[0.034800187,0.000290261,0.00030798142,0.001897031,0.0018260126,0.0021388645,0.0024004949,0.0012723973,0.00036241417],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000703687,0.00023051498,0.9661941,0.000057399036,0.00003113318,0.0001592313,0.022044508,0.00007704138,0.0003356994,0.0002467745,0.00045065867,0.010102568],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000061786805,0.00021114608,0.97193044,0.000055225126,0.000007885848,0.00031931917,0.025007507,0.0002785032,0.0002298869,0.00016923274,0.0017660103,0.000018600736],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003193263,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028622458,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99866575,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001014817,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000985066,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05143696},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4323783977","doi":"10.3138/jsp-2022-0035","title":"Quid Pro Quo Authorship: Characteristics and Implications","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Status quo; Terminology; Political science; Linguistics; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.07165548441303417,"score_gpt":0.33976078223748346,"score_spread":0.2681052978244493,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4323783977","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.964753,0.0009990182,0.0024352188,0.0054467455,0.00004936317,0.000121825295,0.00015578957,0.00003830322,0.026000744],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99767405,0.00032921653,0.0009875356,0.00015015127,0.000029680506,0.0000660654,0.00007294517,0.000020494661,0.0006698034],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9819535,0.009789528,0.0017739796,0.0009942334,0.0045510973,0.0009375884],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7347363,0.19586442,0.03773696,0.007891633,0.01914637,0.004624359],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015936088,0.00018496807,0.00050400366,0.0072650197,0.00519915,0.0075072376,0.0011713739,0.0011953424,0.0024598844],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1478898,0.00026621606,0.00027321326,0.014190584,0.0070256167,0.008849697,0.003416982,0.0016859142,0.00048788826],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018787038,0.0003149977,0.58593607,0.0005518888,0.000033208784,0.0011917824,0.23685692,0.0002992093,0.0010955388,0.05527484,0.0027143524,0.11554342],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002501138,0.00019257265,0.50270426,0.00046579057,0.00003150709,0.0033024126,0.3930205,0.002297956,0.0012122238,0.07312517,0.023525218,0.00009745109],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021275987,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002535132,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9988046,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0039535253,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0044776658,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08427912},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4352977788","doi":"10.5212/praxeduc.v.18.21679.020","title":"Automatic paraphrasing tools: an unexpected consequence of addressing student plagiarism and the impact of COVID in distance education settings","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Praxis Educativa","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Agencia Estatal de Investigación; European Regional Development Fund","keywords":"Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Academic integrity; Field (mathematics); Matching (statistics); Data science; Analytics; Plagiarism detection; Computer science; Period (music); 2019-20 coronavirus outbreak; Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2); Psychological intervention; World Wide Web; Medical education; Psychology; Information retrieval; Library science","score_opus":0.048679848646313376,"score_gpt":0.4223057305265351,"score_spread":0.3736258818802217,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4352977788","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9762615,0.0012945373,0.006279104,0.0015083264,0.00007370921,0.00013025255,0.0028052672,0.00036349974,0.011283906],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.992322,0.00045005162,0.0037416546,0.00019515942,0.00005973145,0.00004960755,0.0012459437,0.00007459172,0.0018612123],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9849284,0.0051655266,0.0017856625,0.0013442142,0.006080891,0.00069533533],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8054633,0.11491425,0.037507206,0.01306926,0.02608522,0.0029607383],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009292205,0.00035405337,0.00049338693,0.007470466,0.0013473987,0.0043640393,0.0009236764,0.0010613282,0.0029591545],"category_scores_gemma":[0.109261274,0.00021641939,0.0003286397,0.010355165,0.001122676,0.004820032,0.0025543347,0.001336243,0.0014525343],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006659473,0.00030491978,0.53745383,0.0033732704,0.0001504395,0.0018310513,0.050223745,0.0011616996,0.011269498,0.0043013976,0.010593174,0.37867102],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017265695,0.00054722844,0.89672285,0.00074256,0.00012248951,0.00340962,0.03908127,0.004711935,0.0119380895,0.0031677678,0.039415926,0.00012297643],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0045975894,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0093988925,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9989387,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012101054,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018087503,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04914242},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["research_integrity"],"domain":null,"study_design":"qualitative","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["research_integrity"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W4361205834","doi":"10.1177/03064190231166665","title":"Exploring natural language processing in mechanical engineering education: Implications for academic integrity","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Mechanical Engineering Education","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"University of Calgary","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Computer science; Extant taxon; Automation; Cheating; Academic integrity; Natural (archaeology); Natural language; Engineering ethics; Software engineering; Artificial intelligence; Data science; Engineering; Mechanical engineering; Psychology","score_opus":0.06078129438859478,"score_gpt":0.3752472311078585,"score_spread":0.3144659367192637,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4361205834","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11079596,0.43179512,0.15322216,0.21668483,0.0012958461,0.0002680638,0.00022937634,0.00049609307,0.0852126],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.752633,0.16043068,0.06702286,0.013664874,0.0011134293,0.000370328,0.00019091896,0.00013288883,0.004440998],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.97710323,0.014305843,0.0015778309,0.0013100603,0.00511382,0.00058924017],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6060526,0.35710162,0.0136744315,0.006305129,0.014773476,0.0020927282],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.036764316,0.00041437912,0.0007835557,0.005262632,0.0016558905,0.010953382,0.002250243,0.003154969,0.0032572234],"category_scores_gemma":[0.13004774,0.00038290865,0.00078815845,0.0053501762,0.009541966,0.022252675,0.0039144796,0.0041039907,0.0007325613],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009916206,0.0003533607,0.015790274,0.009466723,0.00012497313,0.00040137128,0.024859702,0.0028934956,0.0015186865,0.28168485,0.005595259,0.6572121],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000043595843,0.00040963668,0.016907554,0.018841527,0.00019882453,0.00094254635,0.035752427,0.006547053,0.006947005,0.652082,0.26110426,0.00022363824],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020973634,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024793125,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.996845,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037908363,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008444632,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19443059},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4361801578","doi":"10.55365/1923.x2023.21.5","title":"Factors Influencing Academic Fraud Prevention among Accounting Students","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Economics and Finance","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Embarrassment; Academic integrity; Psychology; Accounting; Punishment (psychology); Identification (biology); Medical education; Business; Social psychology; Medicine","score_opus":0.04612583035956254,"score_gpt":0.344293757186178,"score_spread":0.29816792682661547,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4361801578","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9925903,0.0017456346,0.00028528977,0.0018942974,0.000031633965,0.000028651004,0.00005579886,0.000008994219,0.0033593834],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99847764,0.0008018177,0.00012393446,0.000100371115,0.000019934138,0.0000052850587,0.000026568447,0.0000012400976,0.00044341324],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974286,0.0008070688,0.0002535061,0.00012889894,0.00096192496,0.00041997386],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9854789,0.0024883572,0.0075097927,0.0003992011,0.002097971,0.0020259016],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017895254,0.0001972405,0.00025512144,0.0020658162,0.0012376137,0.001897273,0.00034754773,0.000681909,0.0029433472],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017390408,0.00011341636,0.00032235045,0.001901682,0.0006267742,0.00065134023,0.0007830603,0.00091860315,0.00042753055],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027103868,0.0002205805,0.95974535,0.00005930421,0.000026516034,0.00017590521,0.0010665127,0.000055044664,0.00014488513,0.00038337836,0.0006800837,0.037415344],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000031387322,0.000078845165,0.99164504,0.00009652272,0.000043247946,0.00039911736,0.0034138479,0.00024169365,0.00023053332,0.000497739,0.003334776,0.000015336887],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029409693,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003363379,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99931806,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006939701,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021940554,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.009846449},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4362590573","doi":"10.29173/istl2724","title":"Exploring Factors Contributing to Plagiarism as Students Enter STEM Higher Education Classrooms","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Issues in Science and Technology Librarianship","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Grading (engineering); Point (geometry); Mathematics education; Class (philosophy); Population; Psychology; Plagiarism detection; Pedagogy; Sociology; Computer science; Mathematics; Biology","score_opus":0.11383364232330904,"score_gpt":0.3768442148399174,"score_spread":0.26301057251660837,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4362590573","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99794596,0.0002640708,0.00015071922,0.00035626383,0.000008852855,0.000036049394,0.00004203851,0.000013909883,0.0011822741],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984394,0.00030552148,0.0003029994,0.000096466036,0.000014092413,0.000025897527,0.000068744404,0.0000071567692,0.0007398343],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9918725,0.00211344,0.0010138461,0.0006120237,0.0035043901,0.00088378147],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93081415,0.021473952,0.030054495,0.0020081042,0.009720214,0.0059290123],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0071118604,0.00045097046,0.00072804454,0.0041463654,0.0036559016,0.0051270793,0.0015331936,0.0012766036,0.004398561],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0569516,0.00056662917,0.0005781926,0.0023769194,0.0016979828,0.0033978622,0.0032125574,0.0026949598,0.0009629109],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008686642,0.00053417654,0.884839,0.00023821008,0.00005734116,0.0004559388,0.08649713,0.000086135944,0.0010041911,0.00026386822,0.0009366822,0.025000585],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000064309893,0.0003186286,0.8689574,0.00019921154,0.000041220173,0.0005677862,0.1250051,0.00036820027,0.0004885734,0.0004014714,0.0035959464,0.00005003058],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006736469,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012550072,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9987234,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021070042,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029086582,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.037611544},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["research_integrity"],"domain":null,"study_design":"qualitative","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["research_integrity"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W4362590789","doi":"10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e15184","title":"COVID-19 retracted publications on retraction watch: A systematic survey of their pre-prints and citations","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Heliyon","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University; St. Joseph’s Healthcare Hamilton; Impact","funders":"","keywords":"Misinformation; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Citation; 2019-20 coronavirus outbreak; Scientific misconduct; Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2); Medicine; Library science; Alternative medicine; Computer science; Pathology; Disease; Infectious disease (medical specialty)","score_opus":0.11558438210485338,"score_gpt":0.3766997325126453,"score_spread":0.26111535040779194,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4362590789","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3267436,0.5644008,0.006121638,0.020849105,0.003627931,0.0044264975,0.053164214,0.00050596386,0.020160288],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6793098,0.26885614,0.009789072,0.0073807384,0.0021135977,0.006182083,0.020412387,0.00040262143,0.005553638],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","domain_scores_codex":[0.8580608,0.041038457,0.055559933,0.0062054084,0.03718508,0.0019503768],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.3449887,0.385049,0.16688642,0.023870368,0.07370521,0.005500254],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.095727146,0.00067865406,0.002175376,0.034714248,0.0017514436,0.0048597804,0.0025356214,0.0015016727,0.009131611],"category_scores_gemma":[0.44414023,0.0007626325,0.002007714,0.034089934,0.00224721,0.007148205,0.0041976687,0.0016104731,0.0018614844],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011522305,0.00015916978,0.2814159,0.24772465,0.0026990399,0.001256086,0.01755899,0.00017178577,0.0010026398,0.002260276,0.06222906,0.3823702],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000450021,0.000784304,0.4742181,0.244412,0.0039289803,0.0041367277,0.018585026,0.00039293588,0.001686665,0.0022507822,0.24887441,0.0002800015],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032275105,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004673584,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9984983,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028551694,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012309537,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.50625956},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity","bibliometrics"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","research_integrity"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"design_other","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W4367459059","doi":"10.1007/978-981-287-079-7_89-1","title":"Academic Integrity Through Ethical Teaching and Assessment: Overview and Current Trends","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Academic integrity; Engineering ethics; Ethical issues; Experiential learning; Psychology; Identification (biology); Higher education; Pedagogy; Medical education; Political science; Engineering; Medicine","score_opus":0.16039365372449274,"score_gpt":0.4492442963303862,"score_spread":0.28885064260589344,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4367459059","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0007270122,0.8232156,0.0110899685,0.023513714,0.002614132,0.000036595167,0.00003371356,0.00013244522,0.13863683],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.019404953,0.8752691,0.012102892,0.008901545,0.005481427,0.00010143048,0.00010149812,0.00014956924,0.07848759],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99716467,0.0010555257,0.00014116516,0.00015669028,0.0013529175,0.00012898361],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99152464,0.0062032845,0.00039627444,0.00025480866,0.0012664708,0.0003544533],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0045477194,0.0006602747,0.0007498661,0.0035616765,0.0009792481,0.009015064,0.0015541961,0.003306344,0.010989979],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0057760365,0.0003095008,0.00043176074,0.0051444946,0.0064015035,0.00665275,0.0033130383,0.0059453426,0.00390764],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014681815,0.000059817517,0.0002274041,0.002373595,0.000013989633,0.00007561541,0.0014781741,0.00031541957,0.0002233552,0.24755096,0.11463879,0.63302815],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000031654813,0.000017347647,0.0002656226,0.0027962716,0.0000067924257,0.00036450682,0.00048611456,0.00020995269,0.0001943155,0.06791204,0.92773193,0.000011986354],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021007604,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0046295533,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9966937,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036063932,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0070972247,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.036765218},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4372349141","doi":"10.1007/s10805-023-09476-6","title":"Contract Cheating and Student Stress: Insights from a Canadian Community College","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Academic Ethics","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary; Bow Valley College","funders":"Bow Valley College","keywords":"Cheating; Stress (linguistics); Community college; Psychology; Political science; Business; Social psychology; Linguistics; Medical education; Medicine; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0888554506618393,"score_gpt":0.4014505113765932,"score_spread":0.3125950607147539,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4372349141","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9656273,0.00044727646,0.00009840706,0.013364012,0.000069343674,0.00005423583,0.000105853214,0.000005856777,0.020227794],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9921755,0.0005326301,0.000072262046,0.0020444014,0.000027078506,0.000015108572,0.00003798972,0.000010397456,0.0050846078],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99467695,0.0012325702,0.000076714,0.0002655577,0.0011092226,0.0026388932],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9818764,0.0039634346,0.0017768589,0.00030743607,0.0035967126,0.008479221],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037144439,0.00037134136,0.0006194563,0.0027187788,0.0465652,0.012199343,0.0034613553,0.004199966,0.0071166893],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012553967,0.0004603976,0.00035921333,0.005429541,0.013551456,0.0028911752,0.0069644717,0.008025497,0.00045170315],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000116848714,0.00066413544,0.111719884,0.000063432315,0.000024233155,0.0016360595,0.846035,0.00010596728,0.000316168,0.00980439,0.012345958,0.017167915],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008142065,0.000029970997,0.03790754,0.00006574773,0.0000071115974,0.00008650011,0.9488989,0.00007911533,0.000032565433,0.00049070024,0.012366181,0.000027471111],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9605257,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98698723,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9958,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07091984,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.11118053,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5145619},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4376460912","doi":"10.1007/978-981-287-079-7_107-1","title":"Academic Integrity and the Canadian University Ombudsperson","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Academic integrity; Misconduct; Mandate; Research integrity; Political science; Promotion (chess); Accountability; Public relations; Inclusion (mineral); Psychology; Law; Social psychology","score_opus":0.044532304433111715,"score_gpt":0.26797890647453976,"score_spread":0.22344660204142805,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4376460912","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0010397104,0.01790712,0.0005048939,0.055239312,0.0035533293,0.00003596154,0.00008763747,0.00005795201,0.921574],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.035031475,0.009751223,0.0005410233,0.008769056,0.000682686,0.000033604374,0.000046000467,0.000114462244,0.94503045],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9907204,0.0012620123,0.00017956039,0.00062886113,0.0045291437,0.0026801117],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99102235,0.0013042714,0.00018584113,0.0003628742,0.005155147,0.001969518],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0063940585,0.0008929669,0.00096852944,0.0049516754,0.044288725,0.02546632,0.0033535569,0.009599995,0.04069377],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014229555,0.00094040966,0.0006583679,0.007143533,0.01695796,0.0066840886,0.005321518,0.012141507,0.006315669],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000071249324,0.00000941295,0.000105264386,0.000033243574,0.0000020944485,0.00004365291,0.0022635476,0.00006197611,0.000024945846,0.5805009,0.40057558,0.016372353],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000001892452,0.0000018395968,0.0002525305,0.00010273612,0.0000028368543,0.000021548854,0.0013795366,0.000053596574,0.000024435547,0.013788435,0.9843566,0.000013964604],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96769285,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98649615,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9904,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1526434,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2383776,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98281354},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4376527377","doi":"10.1007/978-981-287-079-7_192-1","title":"Academic Integrity in Nepal","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Cheating; Academic integrity; Misconduct; Morality; Engineering ethics; Political science; Public relations; Scientific misconduct; Pedagogy; Sociology; Psychology; Law; Engineering; Social psychology; Medicine","score_opus":0.07982288624924568,"score_gpt":0.3446286432909451,"score_spread":0.26480575704169945,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4376527377","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0051395865,0.020595081,0.00034357246,0.007870804,0.00045011085,0.0000245548,0.000026426542,0.00002161657,0.96552813],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2039256,0.021574765,0.0004982128,0.004250147,0.0005887521,0.00007986372,0.000048770577,0.000052964704,0.7689809],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991541,0.0003138293,0.00003895712,0.000073343996,0.0002495981,0.00017015351],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988268,0.0005661199,0.00008505347,0.00012569045,0.00027340968,0.00012297522],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012718854,0.00033481058,0.0003968369,0.0013984712,0.009445797,0.011576719,0.00071040186,0.0028799057,0.012962562],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031504536,0.00026706365,0.00015355361,0.0031611926,0.005780926,0.0049335826,0.004040754,0.004509529,0.0030480046],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001773175,0.000049662474,0.00039592365,0.0002713778,0.00000408358,0.00043275778,0.025391327,0.00014461133,0.00013597524,0.8107647,0.07276621,0.08962564],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000046174187,0.000021121616,0.0010059804,0.00055371074,0.000005481642,0.00032896645,0.006011221,0.00010577448,0.00026988858,0.06512768,0.926553,0.000012463084],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013358869,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.030026525,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9971201,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007025175,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008520442,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05097139},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4376611400","doi":"10.1007/s40979-023-00130-7","title":"Faculty members’ use of artificial intelligence to grade student papers: a case of implications","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal for Educational Integrity","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":65,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"","keywords":"Dilemma; Principle of legality; Field (mathematics); Discretion; Computer science; Engineering ethics; Psychology; Mathematics education; Engineering; Political science; Law; Epistemology","score_opus":0.23693448257702435,"score_gpt":0.5090555197410058,"score_spread":0.2721210371639815,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4376611400","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.50530785,0.002180799,0.014838652,0.301016,0.0020157227,0.00030635577,0.00007095059,0.0003501318,0.17391354],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97105676,0.0004636276,0.0026558554,0.01112056,0.00046944266,0.00010277796,0.0000147451165,0.00006518501,0.0140510565],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.89145905,0.07869056,0.0040700156,0.0034148367,0.015940031,0.0064255744],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8340239,0.10390179,0.01966412,0.010800545,0.01717141,0.0144381905],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.049962815,0.0005807542,0.00058932055,0.00298512,0.031440444,0.015623879,0.0047423183,0.011390427,0.0070629823],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1841212,0.00074335036,0.0009276151,0.0032865892,0.014463632,0.007939165,0.011829637,0.011877048,0.0021588749],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027138198,0.00067237066,0.026357466,0.00029749528,0.000055090786,0.053869896,0.5811234,0.00090639386,0.0022982107,0.19928652,0.05526094,0.07960085],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008057317,0.00045339382,0.004787017,0.00064518966,0.00004914796,0.018808153,0.35658142,0.0018073681,0.0049929926,0.038159575,0.5734593,0.00017583584],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003210271,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0037384308,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98860955,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009645118,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008400047,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2642318},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4377043227","doi":"10.14429/djlit.43.02.18419","title":"Contemplating and Visualizing Plagiarism Through a Bibliometric Study","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"DESIDOC Journal of Library & Information Technology","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Theme (computing); Citation; Dishonesty; Marketing buzz; Publishing; Library science; Plagiarism detection; Public relations; Sociology; Political science; Computer science; Law; World Wide Web; Information retrieval","score_opus":0.036957985104605,"score_gpt":0.3395539043814464,"score_spread":0.3025959192768414,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4377043227","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92413384,0.0030353134,0.014488116,0.0017447303,0.0001151567,0.00070479896,0.008011299,0.0007815611,0.046985146],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98072386,0.0017477013,0.0118110385,0.000047910788,0.00009750415,0.00037372223,0.0032700892,0.00005010365,0.0018780235],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98978406,0.0026876763,0.0019591735,0.00049284217,0.004795724,0.00028054265],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9609459,0.026435386,0.006155938,0.001425212,0.004635552,0.00040204838],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011483381,0.00043777176,0.00063859107,0.100443326,0.0012703738,0.0047865137,0.0005560163,0.0006038613,0.002370942],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030852892,0.00019024074,0.0006716769,0.098634064,0.0011729839,0.0038247926,0.002278629,0.00046793005,0.00054536265],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025331922,0.00030017633,0.4542453,0.006306871,0.00067836134,0.0013211034,0.07197259,0.0036770713,0.008312425,0.030173276,0.017411426,0.40534818],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000038240698,0.00034461968,0.78094774,0.0014952547,0.00047291556,0.0015608039,0.08663941,0.016770143,0.007884295,0.01584638,0.087773666,0.00022652489],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027364814,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028866879,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99939615,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017563609,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018506452,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.060730696},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4377248374","doi":"10.1007/978-981-287-079-7_98-1","title":"Supporting Students with Academic Integrity and Ethical Learning: Introduction","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Mount Royal University","funders":"","keywords":"Academic integrity; Attribution; Categorization; Learning development; Psychology; Section (typography); Higher education; Engineering ethics; Pedagogy; Mathematics education; Engineering; Computer science; Political science; Social psychology","score_opus":0.04413198580076413,"score_gpt":0.3764982787035311,"score_spread":0.332366292902767,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4377248374","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0011295332,0.053782318,0.012824769,0.015969949,0.009198817,0.00017806361,0.0001966381,0.00024196245,0.906478],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0069160014,0.035015535,0.005214772,0.0064839283,0.003408421,0.0001871271,0.00017292601,0.00016275584,0.94243854],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99975234,0.000056575656,0.000010863177,0.000035207675,0.000111964786,0.000033062344],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996189,0.00014964581,0.00001850488,0.000017587132,0.00012775957,0.00006763113],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00042933962,0.00087864464,0.0004406821,0.0013153345,0.001754871,0.0040998007,0.00089510676,0.0030843136,0.04237224],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00086964126,0.00035061737,0.0004407863,0.001410059,0.0016248038,0.004268599,0.0024035675,0.0037228013,0.015797582],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008003011,0.00013009603,0.00012292215,0.0004637357,0.0000030430022,0.00012916084,0.0014351436,0.0004870204,0.0004511515,0.2048943,0.6238691,0.1680063],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000016323854,0.000013248784,0.00014590094,0.00031792655,0.0000011597456,0.00009906963,0.00029742336,0.00008734564,0.00007702986,0.027226562,0.97172743,0.0000051761162],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002511289,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009612607,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9969157,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019682297,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025812,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14174932},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4377248907","doi":"10.1007/978-981-287-079-7_90-1","title":"Academic Integrity and the Affordances and Limitations of Authentic Assessment","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Medicine Hat College","funders":"","keywords":"Cheating; Academic integrity; Academic dishonesty; Outsourcing; Authentic assessment; Psychology; Affordance; Medical education; Pedagogy; Public relations; Engineering ethics; Social psychology; Political science; Business; Engineering; Marketing; Medicine; Curriculum","score_opus":0.10287068104871992,"score_gpt":0.3493928628363063,"score_spread":0.24652218178758634,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4377248907","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004142125,0.018180583,0.018760102,0.033505008,0.0007565538,0.000040834642,0.000030061516,0.00010253568,0.92448217],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.59614336,0.022655997,0.015911099,0.0066988617,0.0020263032,0.00023575066,0.000057121186,0.00028987764,0.3559817],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9860336,0.008951122,0.00036164906,0.0005389105,0.0036528257,0.0004618084],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95957977,0.031994123,0.0013589468,0.0031011477,0.0031503863,0.0008155263],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012190153,0.00045511237,0.0005500155,0.002364992,0.0047053187,0.019247577,0.0015757235,0.004102718,0.010749291],"category_scores_gemma":[0.039058268,0.00036328845,0.00027703604,0.0024776338,0.04252598,0.017717402,0.006816065,0.008299134,0.00263023],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000030191525,0.000005876191,0.00006692482,0.00003436106,9.4959637e-7,0.000020535543,0.0031370563,0.00008116421,0.000018502773,0.97417134,0.0062718247,0.016188402],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000025527615,0.000008997211,0.00018447907,0.0002659893,0.000002325897,0.00013063809,0.0023110544,0.00030439455,0.00017185175,0.86412674,0.13248096,0.000010091257],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031553062,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0053891125,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9958973,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004385704,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007252193,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06446844},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4377992433","doi":"10.1007/978-3-030-22767-8_405","title":"Academic Ethics and Academic Integrity","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brandon University","funders":"","keywords":"Academic integrity; Research integrity; Engineering ethics; Political science; Engineering","score_opus":0.17067972816899293,"score_gpt":0.39449361383072507,"score_spread":0.22381388566173213,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4377992433","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0005370547,0.0069386293,0.0012633664,0.010994961,0.0006382437,0.000014713381,0.000013752531,0.00001898606,0.9795802],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.05916655,0.0053422945,0.0007602484,0.005848396,0.0015640779,0.00007355801,0.000024736415,0.00007273447,0.9271475],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99615896,0.001929003,0.00009663706,0.0002462208,0.0012300573,0.00033905657],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99618185,0.002084825,0.00021686224,0.00037156616,0.00087409327,0.00027078923],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032462256,0.00063004164,0.0005984825,0.0020112025,0.0075718467,0.013287955,0.0011410427,0.006329015,0.022359246],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008290234,0.00036851587,0.00024500105,0.0027976395,0.017536147,0.0070070927,0.00358237,0.0077341436,0.009944711],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000021919534,0.0000081484295,0.000023471717,0.000020865371,9.65533e-7,0.00001626842,0.0012845456,0.00004935478,0.000014167918,0.942247,0.048920177,0.0074128406],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000033191984,0.000004938889,0.00010759933,0.00013361397,0.000001906208,0.000057656474,0.0008504477,0.00012859619,0.00007945916,0.47083732,0.527789,0.000006185581],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0066430387,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012943791,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.993671,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0068400516,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007305205,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07479912},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4377992567","doi":"10.1007/978-3-030-22767-8_1308","title":"Academic Integrity and University Corporate Accountability","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Academic integrity; Accountability; Political science; Business; Engineering; Engineering ethics; Law","score_opus":0.09720248122422767,"score_gpt":0.3023784971448379,"score_spread":0.20517601592061022,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4377992567","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0009844668,0.007355249,0.0014486099,0.010629295,0.0006772933,0.000009587817,0.000016891341,0.00003202526,0.9788466],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.08377648,0.0049565355,0.0006563763,0.0026741743,0.001137866,0.000037942038,0.000022457069,0.000066218985,0.9066719],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982797,0.0006919847,0.000042511445,0.00012920669,0.00064808736,0.00020850783],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978976,0.0010464994,0.00014369393,0.000211722,0.0005244299,0.00017592942],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017248729,0.00039110126,0.0003607372,0.0013812075,0.005354195,0.01100856,0.00084949133,0.0037794812,0.022691349],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005057145,0.00025328432,0.00019107151,0.0026247804,0.0068212408,0.005517125,0.0022478495,0.004994767,0.005276033],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000023615705,0.000009224326,0.000043854347,0.000015946373,7.4308696e-7,0.000012416407,0.00082280213,0.000103448496,0.000020088997,0.93043536,0.054256227,0.014277623],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000024555984,0.0000061756937,0.0003201654,0.000115044284,0.0000022709405,0.00003970603,0.00078634254,0.0003365442,0.00016323062,0.39527407,0.6029452,0.000008770252],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010227902,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021097729,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9962205,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00696777,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0059744,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07591009},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4378232964","doi":"10.1007/978-981-287-079-7_83-1","title":"Global Perspectives on Academic Integrity: Introduction","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Academic integrity; Misconduct; Research integrity; Section (typography); Structural integrity; Engineering ethics; Key (lock); Political science; Sociology; Computer science; Engineering; Law; Computer security","score_opus":0.04492821389248983,"score_gpt":0.33218286561629334,"score_spread":0.2872546517238035,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4378232964","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00067339884,0.09334918,0.003114258,0.03286293,0.0071911393,0.000029869185,0.000094779156,0.00006882704,0.8626155],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.027909078,0.13331158,0.0024502168,0.016925214,0.014422219,0.00013456917,0.00023381796,0.00026197583,0.80435133],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993375,0.00022466078,0.00002845966,0.00007638138,0.00024083281,0.00009213291],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99906796,0.000524537,0.000046484187,0.00006935814,0.0002039148,0.00008776407],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012129985,0.0009298229,0.0005836625,0.0027203357,0.0031324911,0.007449959,0.0010171268,0.004260328,0.04445549],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018539461,0.0003369639,0.00039569003,0.0044555506,0.005609204,0.008687739,0.0041448125,0.0057635084,0.010035098],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006081085,0.000020818334,0.00005345181,0.00029990426,0.000002726098,0.000056319343,0.0017405995,0.00021019517,0.00010476381,0.69122535,0.25475058,0.05152921],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000012463063,0.0000054274064,0.00008887367,0.00030145244,0.0000013535561,0.000053977084,0.00042996378,0.000032329826,0.00003066165,0.07001851,0.9290329,0.0000034277102],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031133548,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007329423,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9957397,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003774906,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028128803,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14871848},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4378697600","doi":"10.1007/978-981-287-079-7_165-1","title":"Academic and Research Integrity as Transdisciplinary Fields of Scholarship and Professional Practice","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Transdisciplinarity; Scholarship; Engineering ethics; Stakeholder; Sociology; Work (physics); Political science; Social science; Engineering; Public relations","score_opus":0.1794728103115736,"score_gpt":0.48095187061691946,"score_spread":0.3014790603053459,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4378697600","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002095215,0.017250556,0.005304948,0.01696055,0.0009323303,0.00003313754,0.000018164455,0.000046133016,0.9573591],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.21099159,0.017260578,0.005020588,0.0055138767,0.002446193,0.0002235755,0.000050814986,0.00016938846,0.75832343],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99118364,0.0051184115,0.00024456994,0.00047767774,0.0024923258,0.0004833875],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9887888,0.007381285,0.00048785823,0.001171173,0.0014732064,0.00069772184],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0077917827,0.0005678204,0.000721004,0.0023741259,0.006318638,0.02349769,0.0017346399,0.0062762513,0.01328539],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012637217,0.00039673192,0.0002536848,0.0038709405,0.03393715,0.013159559,0.0066990075,0.009101755,0.0039761467],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000018395325,0.000005996626,0.000021035197,0.000021558155,6.5627216e-7,0.000012867526,0.0032277987,0.000031558364,0.000019305744,0.9803295,0.008740614,0.007587313],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000039009333,0.000008143063,0.00012617641,0.00020351348,0.000002256202,0.000107984015,0.0036622246,0.00021350801,0.00009676939,0.65583825,0.33972982,0.000007513884],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031425909,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0065678167,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99372375,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0067335367,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011006157,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.048855484},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4379032086","doi":"10.1007/978-981-287-079-7_159-1","title":"Designing International Research to Promote Academic Integrity: From Funding to Educating","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec en Outaouais","funders":"","keywords":"Academic integrity; General partnership; Dream; Public relations; Research integrity; Political science; Engineering ethics; Pedagogy; Management; Sociology; Psychology; Engineering; Law","score_opus":0.29024431262974687,"score_gpt":0.4635236848789639,"score_spread":0.17327937224921702,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4379032086","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004502806,0.012035089,0.04073919,0.06580282,0.0019243774,0.00015269003,0.00004369264,0.00029307022,0.8745062],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.26620927,0.032803815,0.08197477,0.018312389,0.0017013173,0.0010581419,0.00014184974,0.0010017045,0.59679675],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99024135,0.006819524,0.0002098921,0.0003966839,0.001928088,0.0004044326],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9688243,0.024288258,0.0011370974,0.00176382,0.0022875557,0.0016988951],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017997174,0.0005446622,0.0004083079,0.0013632333,0.0035517833,0.012398833,0.0013316885,0.003105859,0.014110283],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027501123,0.00048784108,0.00024537227,0.0016122076,0.010597428,0.010674908,0.0039650244,0.0050027594,0.0043969452],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010355105,0.00004971109,0.00038985413,0.00024865553,0.0000048474885,0.000041397,0.011314133,0.0002983145,0.00037740756,0.7639766,0.089496404,0.13379233],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000084381845,0.000025840454,0.0003778313,0.0007493927,0.000009227855,0.00007438457,0.007303146,0.00027262172,0.0008218093,0.40383285,0.5865116,0.000012827709],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018939856,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0051737824,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9968941,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005339233,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0136691285,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09517932},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4380032122","doi":"10.1007/978-981-287-079-7_122-1","title":"Academic Integrity Policies in Hispanic South American Higher Education: Status and Recommendations","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Academic integrity; Political science; Misconduct; Higher education; Public relations; Research integrity; Engineering ethics; Public administration; Engineering; Law","score_opus":0.06651282585601474,"score_gpt":0.3620222372898466,"score_spread":0.29550941143383186,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4380032122","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.033281274,0.016961904,0.0004905192,0.798802,0.0022372091,0.00007262458,0.00043804199,0.000084290514,0.14763221],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5643191,0.05149069,0.0040256893,0.19926889,0.004454738,0.0004902856,0.0011531215,0.00016754249,0.17463],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9928236,0.002383358,0.00046770074,0.00049621146,0.0023327305,0.0014962812],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9315279,0.035339992,0.0051429626,0.001496843,0.0163634,0.010128958],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018907694,0.000312527,0.0004084798,0.003908085,0.009762731,0.013672717,0.0046394477,0.009087467,0.020990767],"category_scores_gemma":[0.048949018,0.00043379003,0.00056829094,0.0061083823,0.006858108,0.011269287,0.004750817,0.0104754595,0.0019583148],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000087902095,0.000735645,0.046618298,0.00080436305,0.000028626957,0.00034401164,0.014998474,0.0005614679,0.00023996012,0.23063408,0.5160402,0.18890701],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013636696,0.00021097437,0.13161744,0.009905192,0.00020049159,0.0004024261,0.17964709,0.0014482581,0.0017863538,0.118261,0.5562097,0.00017468553],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.19947235,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.31139433,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99091256,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01290229,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07013903,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3966226},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4380271619","doi":"10.58304/ijts.20230309","title":"What Are ESL Students' Academic Integrity Challenges and How Can Universities Help?","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of TESOL Studies","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Thompson Rivers University","funders":"Thompson Rivers University","keywords":"Academic integrity; Mathematics education; Psychology; Computer science; Pedagogy; Medical education; Engineering ethics; Engineering; Medicine","score_opus":0.10440618971160114,"score_gpt":0.39803600424015373,"score_spread":0.2936298145285526,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4380271619","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.85354364,0.005312511,0.00061988365,0.11295996,0.00021521695,0.00006214844,0.00009124677,0.00006663195,0.02712873],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9938638,0.0017297621,0.0002585543,0.0019630797,0.00003280016,0.000014714759,0.000021696915,0.000009622494,0.0021060861],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9836633,0.005328946,0.0004864879,0.0006787013,0.004700102,0.0051423856],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96612227,0.008227603,0.0059324214,0.00067545736,0.0074606664,0.01158153],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011735101,0.00037343978,0.0008487457,0.0021232136,0.019998012,0.019815216,0.0025198571,0.0041205366,0.003371366],"category_scores_gemma":[0.045110833,0.00039913072,0.00047315267,0.0032287196,0.009886864,0.008694773,0.0060117883,0.004302508,0.0007685873],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009189831,0.00029412986,0.12010573,0.00055516197,0.000041592662,0.0014745407,0.70105517,0.00015170788,0.0008022415,0.008273657,0.011666301,0.15548785],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000050356466,0.000045737957,0.027418075,0.00026737334,0.000014237618,0.0002772789,0.9518503,0.000083373416,0.0002748667,0.0018450056,0.017876538,0.000042241558],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.18880272,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3471563,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9958795,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02195585,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.061429687,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37540752},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4380479869","doi":"10.1007/978-981-287-079-7_158-1","title":"Integrity as a Field of Scholarship: Introduction","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Research integrity; Scholarship; Scientific misconduct; Scientific integrity; Engineering ethics; Misconduct; Field (mathematics); Academic integrity; Research ethics; Section (typography); Political science; Sociology; Library science; Engineering; Computer science; Law; Medicine; Alternative medicine","score_opus":0.04734227484024284,"score_gpt":0.3380557335654782,"score_spread":0.29071345872523535,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4380479869","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000865256,0.11837658,0.008332141,0.019708276,0.006043472,0.000097369164,0.0001444593,0.000095880714,0.8463366],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.035072327,0.11908564,0.0069166785,0.01392995,0.010798394,0.000328399,0.00023002752,0.0002300523,0.8134085],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993389,0.00025169464,0.000031759082,0.00008505107,0.00021615814,0.000076369906],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99885905,0.0007351331,0.0000463272,0.000046558,0.00021653577,0.000096336924],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011850162,0.0008084298,0.00072696886,0.0032462103,0.0027848524,0.008023865,0.0012386893,0.0044847936,0.029967468],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019888745,0.00043188833,0.0004425352,0.00397074,0.0065116007,0.008363648,0.003572508,0.005185008,0.0076469886],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000045128645,0.000030023837,0.000057542973,0.00023848214,0.0000019898032,0.00005770866,0.0015878476,0.0001686278,0.00007315702,0.8335401,0.12947664,0.034763407],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000018259259,0.000008738889,0.00009466241,0.0003767203,0.0000015191458,0.00008824812,0.00061017927,0.00009372854,0.000032059714,0.16069752,0.83798873,0.0000060881207],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0040721213,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009440427,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9955152,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0043363827,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003774445,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10025114},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4380838128","doi":"10.1007/978-981-287-079-7_113-1","title":"Writing the Self: Ghostwriter Perspectives and Identity Construction","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Identity (music); Judgement; Cheating; Misconduct; Sociology; Psychology; Aesthetics; Political science; Social psychology; Law; Art","score_opus":0.025153939922926104,"score_gpt":0.30405158794477644,"score_spread":0.27889764802185035,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4380838128","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.022789244,0.0051334766,0.012450162,0.017469523,0.0009490685,0.000024815987,0.000032373435,0.000082552644,0.9410689],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.784689,0.0025230509,0.00457229,0.0022358822,0.0008253851,0.000080035854,0.000056046458,0.0002841005,0.20473422],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99446636,0.004044627,0.00012452005,0.00033349686,0.00075139233,0.00027969416],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99069464,0.006933164,0.000424189,0.000989458,0.0005621575,0.0003963524],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0054803216,0.00056023774,0.0004785659,0.0021860183,0.010045438,0.019242844,0.0013142639,0.0036757414,0.008826939],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012443223,0.0003171748,0.00023844233,0.0021398754,0.05100354,0.013633123,0.0060334424,0.0063334033,0.0016754046],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000068874965,0.000009341177,0.00007802923,0.000024932624,0.0000010082672,0.00006171713,0.077740006,0.000022927843,0.00007144301,0.9110041,0.005281087,0.0056985146],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012677152,0.00002104157,0.00030154097,0.00029407078,0.000005263709,0.00040413107,0.06896329,0.00026277278,0.0006132291,0.6688759,0.26023123,0.000014833833],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014954646,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018506399,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99632424,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036173551,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026357737,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.029529035},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4380871055","doi":"10.1177/00332941231184385","title":"A Pre-Registered Examination of the Relationship Between Psychopathy, Boredom-Proneness, and University-Level Cheating","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Psychological Reports","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Cheating; Boredom; Psychology; Social psychology; Facet (psychology); Psychopathy; Clinical psychology; Personality; Big Five personality traits","score_opus":0.17323016313124767,"score_gpt":0.37912150620216734,"score_spread":0.20589134307091966,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4380871055","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9975575,0.000022633323,0.00042499838,0.000048034162,0.0000094234365,0.00014721641,0.00024656934,0.000012985703,0.0015307012],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99809927,0.00002090801,0.00051377027,0.000032724143,0.00001109821,0.00021651763,0.00021854152,0.000006461871,0.0008806728],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99723876,0.0008996511,0.000342419,0.00033835258,0.00077085354,0.00041007012],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9694337,0.01364939,0.006788273,0.0035594562,0.0036909208,0.0028782242],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005504054,0.0002496109,0.00043629445,0.001012261,0.0009391687,0.00071569264,0.00051545945,0.00037651815,0.005768954],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025005452,0.00037878953,0.00088239444,0.0007317892,0.000725991,0.00089012587,0.0011556629,0.0012274774,0.0008731405],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015226146,0.00035190172,0.9926059,0.000028012151,0.000029238381,0.000059708553,0.00062077155,0.000026892203,0.0005904383,0.000062595514,0.00019562842,0.0052766493],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000038360895,0.00073441275,0.9982382,0.000004341233,0.000007724647,0.000054221575,0.0004968707,0.0000757577,0.00016514355,0.00001707393,0.0001993258,0.000003169959],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016756431,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004519848,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9996235,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005203915,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001249619,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.029108584},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4381327392","doi":"10.1136/bmj-2022-072929","title":"Poor visibility of retracted articles: a problem that should no longer be ignored","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"BMJ","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval; Hôpital du Saint-Sacrement","funders":"","keywords":"Visibility; Computer science; Data science; Geography; Meteorology","score_opus":0.10426781825665775,"score_gpt":0.37357490914082003,"score_spread":0.26930709088416227,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4381327392","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0014244992,0.012775175,0.0061346577,0.93103606,0.040504348,0.00006258403,0.0002086855,0.0008336806,0.0070202984],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.07426751,0.029313061,0.05224841,0.6694963,0.12422078,0.00032163624,0.0009588503,0.004152123,0.04502137],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.77378875,0.08279233,0.041267242,0.009286233,0.08678856,0.006076926],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.11781797,0.3210135,0.09411141,0.09880144,0.3409698,0.027285822],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.20845069,0.0013000519,0.003940377,0.010536073,0.006171121,0.03498499,0.0073995497,0.027308555,0.020848759],"category_scores_gemma":[0.7077695,0.0026347071,0.0026836046,0.0084405495,0.015021146,0.03363439,0.008640162,0.028206391,0.035620093],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026658576,0.000098725955,0.0038738686,0.001851676,0.00032681075,0.0007578864,0.0019876612,0.00006181837,0.0011072769,0.006879247,0.83960587,0.14318258],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018612981,0.00018692942,0.00582332,0.00485774,0.00033988932,0.0032554031,0.0022737267,0.00085549755,0.0027554636,0.038808808,0.94029355,0.00036358053],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004307328,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005405344,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9726914,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0065855314,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02546814,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97612125},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4381413880","doi":"10.1007/978-981-287-079-7_146-1","title":"Understanding and Addressing Drivers of Corruption in Academic Publishing","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Publication; Misappropriation; Incentive; Language change; Payment; Public relations; Political science; Promotion (chess); Misconduct; Audience measurement; Business; Advertising; Economics; Law; Finance","score_opus":0.35641039343341335,"score_gpt":0.36533715552487644,"score_spread":0.008926762091463092,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4381413880","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.025111876,0.018298114,0.007483788,0.056092285,0.0008241354,0.00007083028,0.00017569996,0.00012658586,0.8918167],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6556239,0.032280874,0.0042380346,0.0054204506,0.0017503321,0.00011761836,0.00021435476,0.00018587071,0.30016845],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.996576,0.0013530398,0.00009725761,0.00018504453,0.0014265701,0.0003620592],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9856308,0.009773409,0.0017554242,0.0005266491,0.0016017768,0.00071191264],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036803843,0.00034680136,0.0003870822,0.0028751038,0.0031563516,0.01578382,0.00086905644,0.0019938708,0.018275417],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015841816,0.00031574952,0.0002573318,0.007784421,0.006616518,0.010455728,0.0026633309,0.0041456567,0.002400689],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007816024,0.00004124528,0.0035948674,0.0001184968,0.00000964141,0.00006254564,0.0048496523,0.00039713515,0.00007522768,0.91364443,0.03413441,0.04306445],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005937052,0.000020487409,0.009714717,0.00085904147,0.000016287322,0.00013153905,0.014014825,0.0018080024,0.00038449062,0.66484517,0.30816934,0.00003024221],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0058867447,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009743481,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9980061,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0061686267,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010177393,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06113732},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4382567762","doi":"10.1007/978-981-287-079-7_153-1","title":"Academic Integrity and Artificial Intelligence: An Overview","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"George Brown College; University of Calgary; Brock University","funders":"","keywords":"Cognitive science; Academic integrity; Computer science; Artificial intelligence; Psychology; Library science","score_opus":0.238991947888491,"score_gpt":0.40635899596182706,"score_spread":0.16736704807333605,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4382567762","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00052121346,0.4948599,0.007871131,0.0077391868,0.0019217676,0.00004901998,0.00009490029,0.00013221567,0.48681065],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.015461811,0.6171864,0.0073180175,0.0050402065,0.0053806873,0.00014690115,0.00026108266,0.00017912386,0.34902564],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99931145,0.00016834961,0.000037415928,0.000063455904,0.00035189628,0.00006738388],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991774,0.0005302827,0.000042711683,0.000047534046,0.00015478896,0.000047216472],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00085448107,0.00084179046,0.0007864,0.0052617956,0.0015937279,0.007940852,0.0011666062,0.0034376627,0.01757625],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014219128,0.00051842135,0.00047083068,0.0077994107,0.003947984,0.007918948,0.0023525557,0.003363269,0.007893273],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001253915,0.00005667147,0.0000984834,0.000953338,0.000009559627,0.000094980925,0.0008459718,0.0006309451,0.00022566241,0.5615522,0.2116991,0.22382048],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000022443212,0.0000072354496,0.0001400205,0.00053488364,0.0000029795326,0.0001625191,0.00014990692,0.0001670439,0.00005894804,0.08495322,0.9138137,0.000007323253],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035405988,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0060799913,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99656236,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003566543,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003145716,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.058798432},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4383960029","doi":"10.1007/978-981-287-079-7_99-1","title":"Teaching Academic Integrity as Good Historical Practice","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Mount Allison University; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Academic integrity; Formative assessment; Scholarship; Engineering ethics; Openness to experience; Discipline; Indigenous; Research integrity; Pedagogy; Sociology; Political science; Psychology; Social science; Law; Engineering; Social psychology","score_opus":0.07212343811111827,"score_gpt":0.3645992818671519,"score_spread":0.29247584375603364,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4383960029","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0009998074,0.005827605,0.0033079449,0.0123901395,0.0009448993,0.000015572234,0.000010898878,0.00004200748,0.9764612],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.15057573,0.0069826427,0.003271282,0.0052066618,0.0019554899,0.00007548819,0.000028353303,0.00016851591,0.8317359],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981414,0.0009657282,0.00004381674,0.00012215669,0.00057912,0.00014781299],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99713194,0.00155726,0.00018540786,0.00032548193,0.00047262368,0.00032727257],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025783265,0.00040871583,0.00031246862,0.0011320943,0.0057952246,0.011051165,0.0011022063,0.0037619825,0.02231949],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005158669,0.00028003042,0.00017111686,0.0013807142,0.016659094,0.0075247693,0.0031671212,0.0073389867,0.005206596],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000011744129,0.000006540568,0.000017012104,0.000017346347,4.0746374e-7,0.000012412694,0.0019547883,0.00005108406,0.000018891913,0.96145785,0.028331064,0.008131477],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002683225,0.0000071516506,0.000069248024,0.00015400958,0.0000015218004,0.000074064716,0.0016071716,0.00014233007,0.00011731795,0.43020362,0.5676157,0.0000052355635],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030232293,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009442251,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.996238,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0056365663,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0059387973,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07466614},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4384135204","doi":"10.1007/978-981-287-079-7_84-1","title":"Academic Integrity in North America: A Comparison of Canada and the USA","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Honor; Academic integrity; Accreditation; Misconduct; Political science; Corporate governance; Indigenization; Equity (law); Diversity (politics); Quality assurance; Management; Sociology; Law; Engineering ethics; Engineering; External quality assessment","score_opus":0.052898768511731635,"score_gpt":0.31372953631121436,"score_spread":0.2608307677994827,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4384135204","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.47898424,0.039588995,0.00042118217,0.056339476,0.0006012923,0.00010130138,0.0022124853,0.0001076837,0.42164332],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9345785,0.022488685,0.00037171465,0.004514445,0.00011144295,0.00003351924,0.0007224613,0.00005432285,0.037124958],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9953055,0.0003920784,0.00011541065,0.00020809726,0.0020747138,0.0019042214],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9820416,0.0021798392,0.0015661528,0.0001895485,0.00940892,0.0046140393],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017938467,0.00024860076,0.000441401,0.0083449595,0.012300398,0.010841962,0.0017927736,0.0019365066,0.0070198476],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009674044,0.00027264285,0.0004897747,0.022653142,0.0043330016,0.0025406205,0.0031701066,0.0021552693,0.0004871018],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00040650895,0.00031226763,0.3525843,0.0007692086,0.00014322317,0.0015824569,0.058001436,0.0011539423,0.000499617,0.13622507,0.1969425,0.2513795],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025436184,0.000060513255,0.6636759,0.00083585817,0.0000986063,0.00038557834,0.11860753,0.0005078069,0.00033440194,0.0026517175,0.21271396,0.00010261835],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9947635,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99872655,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9980635,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11498145,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2157303,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8342527},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4384469708","doi":"10.1007/s40979-023-00136-1","title":"Student perceptions of academic misconduct amongst their peers during the rapid transition to remote instruction","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal for Educational Integrity","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Cheating; Misconduct; Academic integrity; Psychology; Student engagement; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Pandemic; Perception; Medical education; Mathematics education; Pedagogy; Social psychology; Political science; Medicine","score_opus":0.04842813834164943,"score_gpt":0.40661397620512507,"score_spread":0.35818583786347563,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4384469708","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9993443,0.000034397137,0.00002528806,0.00018481645,0.0000060154857,0.0000051107722,0.000007049456,0.0000018317106,0.00039129762],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9997253,0.000034126384,0.000021912616,0.00004265648,0.0000038164612,0.0000047597296,0.000006141915,0.000001068049,0.00016025551],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99594927,0.0015528343,0.0003185387,0.00026712063,0.0011785264,0.0007337777],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9745028,0.0055291504,0.009234944,0.00089944556,0.0039826287,0.005851057],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042447983,0.00026359493,0.000483102,0.0012386829,0.0036992235,0.003388981,0.0010748345,0.0011896373,0.0033193505],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029149858,0.0002992883,0.00041392233,0.0006937915,0.0020727385,0.001399565,0.0032415465,0.0022604966,0.00046670143],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016637133,0.00074432977,0.7790563,0.000068484085,0.000053864977,0.00072146766,0.19700323,0.00010240411,0.0008933895,0.00024825786,0.00088421063,0.02005759],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008851851,0.0008277835,0.5645384,0.00010819156,0.000033110482,0.00048276724,0.43037978,0.00043918996,0.00067912193,0.00019152382,0.0022500714,0.00006114182],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015355115,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018829297,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99881035,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022258402,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021225915,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030531466},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4384663396","doi":"10.1136/bmjebm-2022-111921","title":"Reducing the residue of retractions in evidence synthesis: ways to minimise inappropriate citation and use of retracted data","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"BMJ evidence-based medicine","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Regina","funders":"Alfred P. Sloan Foundation","keywords":"Citation; Systematic review; MEDLINE; Computer science; Medical literature; Data science; Medicine; Political science; Library science; Law","score_opus":0.35376102033369716,"score_gpt":0.42625773168766457,"score_spread":0.0724967113539674,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4384663396","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"reproducibility","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"reproducibility","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016126912,0.034930427,0.5921119,0.28099477,0.026113845,0.025872981,0.0016428118,0.005749232,0.016457161],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.09770248,0.012550441,0.8108369,0.032694466,0.011183909,0.024320882,0.0012222149,0.002552387,0.006936308],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.08465452,0.6081745,0.21870518,0.014639262,0.07086193,0.0029646272],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.010268321,0.76090086,0.08196793,0.07945542,0.06485247,0.0025550013],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.8411662,0.005878992,0.013374125,0.047464512,0.011588958,0.039131165,0.01748821,0.029331936,0.016474787],"category_scores_gemma":[0.9667117,0.010106288,0.013660851,0.045974668,0.022361616,0.049743045,0.032424826,0.02941531,0.013261273],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0027841204,0.0005057997,0.009439609,0.035853572,0.0034738916,0.0012884554,0.040269356,0.0034943847,0.0025324936,0.031094272,0.08325893,0.786005],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004970047,0.0021562604,0.020364178,0.120363235,0.007630837,0.003457134,0.01875216,0.028997509,0.012194821,0.3198967,0.45870796,0.0025091313],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0040390384,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005126503,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9706681,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015374174,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07406521,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1958704},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"domain":"methods","study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"methods","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"domain":"methods","study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"commentary","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W4384931546","doi":"10.1177/09610006231187686","title":"Pedagogical strategy for scholarly communication literacy and avoiding deceptive publishing practices","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Librarianship and Information Science","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Public relations; Scholarly communication; Literacy; Perspective (graphical); Best practice; Sociology; Psychology; Political science; Pedagogy; Computer science","score_opus":0.22168858326046045,"score_gpt":0.4330245079237446,"score_spread":0.21133592466328413,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4384931546","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2938362,0.0030030352,0.3366613,0.13418439,0.002304283,0.0049146293,0.000063384585,0.0024749858,0.22255777],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.68562204,0.0019175994,0.27429587,0.011273602,0.0006494542,0.0026309094,0.000054232034,0.00013035745,0.023426006],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9894168,0.007122723,0.00044595584,0.0005864143,0.0019183955,0.0005096678],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96018136,0.026983293,0.00340512,0.0021725057,0.0035121816,0.003745568],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012991153,0.0006505555,0.00037089505,0.0021201395,0.00305298,0.0052100895,0.001798328,0.0032257375,0.0057770438],"category_scores_gemma":[0.039983522,0.0003724477,0.0005416813,0.00065400347,0.0035811889,0.003970989,0.0064226897,0.0047870344,0.002476029],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001911171,0.0062213135,0.012091355,0.0033094978,0.00006388721,0.0012549611,0.12922667,0.0006260998,0.02017674,0.08288912,0.027058389,0.7168909],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007468264,0.0035960663,0.029306445,0.009607905,0.0004195706,0.007227981,0.15408869,0.0112719685,0.03594325,0.23401588,0.5134428,0.0003325331],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00027972224,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005934821,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99677426,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013732682,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006801332,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.068704545},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385337036","doi":"10.1016/j.cmi.2023.07.022","title":"Retracted publications in infectious diseases and clinical microbiology literature: an analysis using the retraction watch database","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Clinical Microbiology and Infection","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"York University","keywords":"Clinical microbiology; Medicine; Library science; Data science; Microbiology; Computer science; Biology","score_opus":0.05952147022770649,"score_gpt":0.4175446710175391,"score_spread":0.35802320078983263,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385337036","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.37729162,0.12608552,0.0036746857,0.021323781,0.005299233,0.0031337987,0.44077733,0.0009581447,0.021455906],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6152829,0.09558162,0.01569497,0.008969848,0.007312293,0.005774909,0.2342189,0.0012911439,0.015873497],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.87189496,0.01723736,0.06407453,0.006668564,0.03604166,0.0040828837],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.25648805,0.33387384,0.26636538,0.023308739,0.10832988,0.011634214],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.046700623,0.0012717812,0.002858454,0.11249944,0.0027333368,0.008992314,0.0033681649,0.0027821658,0.014889079],"category_scores_gemma":[0.44845733,0.0009695206,0.002501198,0.11010909,0.001970436,0.00618389,0.0064385086,0.0028524054,0.0048942994],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0017313178,0.00023908631,0.65371674,0.031497367,0.0021313392,0.0027475844,0.007368943,0.00039568645,0.00072374154,0.0040902495,0.15008922,0.14526878],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031166288,0.00035902808,0.69935226,0.019814061,0.0025086727,0.005898756,0.0122231245,0.0007250796,0.0007956477,0.0014351847,0.25634062,0.00023592153],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008981472,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0075716674,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99721783,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004216811,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018114222,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24697948},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W4385366742","doi":"10.20378/irb-56855","title":"IAT Faking Indices Revisited : Aspects of Replicability and Differential Validity (Poster)","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Queen's University","keywords":"Psychology; Differential (mechanical device); Engineering","score_opus":0.05929546041802227,"score_gpt":0.34415767675871994,"score_spread":0.2848622163406977,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385366742","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"reproducibility","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"reproducibility","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.49930996,0.01741057,0.3378369,0.025784405,0.008486645,0.0024389692,0.0034229388,0.001546253,0.103763394],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.950768,0.0013009945,0.0393653,0.001525616,0.0021944058,0.0007944106,0.0006829302,0.0005179803,0.0028503498],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.88267064,0.071214356,0.00750506,0.011181298,0.02657304,0.0008555797],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.21168068,0.603958,0.025362672,0.10962578,0.04760857,0.0017643295],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.19199485,0.0016602167,0.002586147,0.00835743,0.002903355,0.010318146,0.006924764,0.0041469545,0.010205941],"category_scores_gemma":[0.66422236,0.0012882684,0.0027637095,0.0076630567,0.013010916,0.01329375,0.0069439434,0.010095556,0.0024325717],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0035788526,0.0007935058,0.2535607,0.0021943985,0.0047800248,0.0007618825,0.017423015,0.002824281,0.0059506977,0.20953874,0.022402296,0.47619164],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005447528,0.0014400943,0.26268852,0.0023492319,0.004150544,0.0021757563,0.005271468,0.033502143,0.015678298,0.65022504,0.02149513,0.0004789529],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001544402,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018853785,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99585307,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017883946,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020129709,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9964142},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385640746","doi":"10.1007/978-981-287-079-7_194-1","title":"Comprehensive Academic Integrity (CAI): An Ethical Framework for Educational Contexts","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Academic integrity; Engineering ethics; Argument (complex analysis); Information ethics; Research integrity; Applied ethics; Foundation (evidence); Sociology; Political science; Engineering; Medicine; Law","score_opus":0.12085076001807994,"score_gpt":0.42191974642981367,"score_spread":0.30106898641173374,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385640746","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0033897168,0.009010583,0.06393912,0.06745405,0.0019682208,0.00018989298,0.000052505256,0.00013395227,0.853862],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5164236,0.007956361,0.07667771,0.029353384,0.0032973655,0.0014880316,0.00009768215,0.00035301037,0.36435294],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98682714,0.008226954,0.0005438325,0.0007799999,0.0027326078,0.0008894148],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98501045,0.009595484,0.0007760336,0.0014066943,0.0022830493,0.0009283407],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014170667,0.0007514997,0.0005895267,0.0019562067,0.008489304,0.017625712,0.0023026655,0.010780666,0.0064360774],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017641546,0.0004691464,0.000549639,0.0021133663,0.05220712,0.011432127,0.008880957,0.01387268,0.0018817068],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[8.12742e-7,0.0000039949505,0.000019197905,0.000013978766,4.7502763e-7,0.000015721695,0.0016341789,0.000048160855,0.00001331677,0.98781615,0.006925831,0.0035080733],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000029517334,0.000008074213,0.00007227659,0.00022727219,0.0000018267981,0.00012335581,0.0022130245,0.00023546092,0.00011948339,0.83904004,0.15794544,0.000010879609],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0047822976,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008065023,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9892193,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0072658584,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017650522,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07494253},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385641357","doi":"10.1007/978-981-287-079-7_140-1","title":"Publication Ethics and Graduate Students","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Misconduct; Publication; Graduate students; Engineering ethics; Research ethics; Meta-ethics; Information ethics; Nursing ethics; Applied ethics; Political science; Graduate education; Sociology; Pedagogy; Engineering; Law","score_opus":0.21788402415302696,"score_gpt":0.4102585732683672,"score_spread":0.19237454911534022,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385641357","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0034139694,0.012715138,0.001926512,0.07237425,0.0025963949,0.00004666073,0.000032412867,0.00007498823,0.90681976],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.07052197,0.0034785466,0.00073982263,0.018076895,0.0024012113,0.00011679233,0.000027853011,0.00013896456,0.90449786],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99100304,0.004771425,0.00025185855,0.0007723154,0.0023161767,0.00088519725],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9888954,0.005040942,0.0005707232,0.0012459882,0.0023620808,0.0018848582],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009127763,0.0006746221,0.00079030794,0.00149154,0.010563569,0.018567268,0.0014011352,0.010672878,0.024661867],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02320583,0.0005802056,0.00029848615,0.0018327667,0.016082587,0.007535011,0.006389916,0.015968485,0.010757574],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010060785,0.00005949604,0.00026846433,0.000038800525,0.0000026123016,0.00005150746,0.005541993,0.00004358294,0.00005074621,0.8391865,0.12609422,0.028651923],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010086918,0.000022883038,0.0003715182,0.00025084813,0.00000355472,0.00010643597,0.0026646256,0.00013730243,0.00014508667,0.29819325,0.6980828,0.000011773293],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002308112,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004852324,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98932713,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0054771756,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009333863,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08250219},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["research_integrity"],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"other","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"domain":"methods","study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"other","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W4385729965","doi":"10.1080/2194587x.2023.2224575","title":"Teaching the What, Why, and How of Academic Integrity: Naturalistic Evidence From College Classrooms","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of College and Character","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Cheating; Academic integrity; Psychology; Academic dishonesty; Class (philosophy); Punishment (psychology); Higher education; Mathematics education; Academic standards; Graduate students; Pedagogy; Medical education; Social psychology; Political science; Medicine; Computer science","score_opus":0.04465604311242838,"score_gpt":0.323172295857925,"score_spread":0.27851625274549663,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385729965","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99414057,0.00024564881,0.00035249066,0.0006212829,0.000012826927,0.00009238119,0.000024741437,0.000004512063,0.0045054974],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99803954,0.00022923414,0.00045666366,0.00038207782,0.000011451731,0.00010028872,0.000028284521,0.000009734365,0.0007427349],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.972616,0.01965467,0.0011314689,0.002174216,0.0034592056,0.00096440694],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8268433,0.12414355,0.023992563,0.011471318,0.009931902,0.0036173244],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019526865,0.00034611055,0.0005855508,0.0016443337,0.006793483,0.0045524584,0.0018831696,0.0020424507,0.0034736455],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0995841,0.000911715,0.00029420442,0.00083933875,0.0118751675,0.0030763084,0.003966002,0.003007953,0.0005708133],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008603983,0.008850303,0.25973487,0.0006504433,0.00016535644,0.0005502344,0.67531353,0.00022334652,0.0022927134,0.0054110764,0.0030341248,0.042913646],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00043279654,0.0035879768,0.42194104,0.0012291512,0.000155974,0.00096238113,0.5296334,0.0011706986,0.004457175,0.0066163423,0.029644238,0.00016879645],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0116000185,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.028272483,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9979575,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030932953,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031514016,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10326916},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385804204","doi":"10.1016/j.cedpsych.2023.102213","title":"Effects of honor code reminders on university students’ cheating in unproctored exams: A double-blind randomized controlled field study","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Contemporary Educational Psychology","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Ministry of Education of the People's Republic of China; National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Cheating; Honesty; Academic integrity; Psychology; Honor; Academic dishonesty; Test (biology); Medical education; Social psychology; Mathematics education; Computer science; Internet privacy; Medicine","score_opus":0.0709526495026931,"score_gpt":0.41607062407107226,"score_spread":0.34511797456837917,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385804204","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98691654,0.000684882,0.00086280255,0.0001715104,0.0006316804,0.008979033,0.00045483044,0.00016567316,0.0011331228],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97042847,0.0008211257,0.005174835,0.0003952251,0.0008970652,0.01808051,0.00026376155,0.00007025285,0.003868804],"study_design_codex":"randomized_trial","study_design_gemma":"randomized_trial","domain_scores_codex":[0.9954342,0.0018675205,0.0005366306,0.0011396095,0.00037902177,0.00064298895],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98624706,0.006907671,0.0019988879,0.0017234472,0.00083356607,0.002289379],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039817574,0.002689856,0.0063360594,0.0011349574,0.0018220553,0.0015589299,0.0020733057,0.004694478,0.013120753],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012422603,0.0019021997,0.0018906359,0.0007480405,0.0034958194,0.0017248647,0.0011514243,0.0051582037,0.0017552067],"study_design_candidate":"randomized_trial","study_design_consensus":"randomized_trial","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.9162358,0.070870854,0.00019326321,0.0005076633,0.00020405189,0.0000119044835,0.00010475111,0.00010908984,0.0022833461,0.000069190384,0.00023672714,0.009173312],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.6811969,0.3109205,0.003501582,0.000080176,0.00059033034,0.000011134483,0.00007521976,0.0005430747,0.0022337586,0.0002581785,0.0005370861,0.000051915864],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015607264,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019112099,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99530554,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010953941,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002254214,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.043893278},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385895726","doi":"10.1080/03075079.2023.2246073","title":"Effects of academic dishonesty policy reminder on university students’ exam cheating – a double-blind randomized controlled experimental field study","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Studies in Higher Education","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Philosophy and Social Science Foundation of Hunan Province; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Cheating; Academic dishonesty; Honesty; Psychology; Academic integrity; Dishonesty; Higher education; Social psychology; Medical education; Pedagogy; Political science; Law; Medicine","score_opus":0.0799453911434965,"score_gpt":0.4490653310688532,"score_spread":0.36911993992535674,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385895726","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9470763,0.00044124332,0.002877106,0.000231002,0.00082202104,0.0458614,0.00048855186,0.00022046444,0.0019818444],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8522635,0.00067336723,0.024934402,0.00079624326,0.00086496613,0.11440148,0.0002913726,0.000058252263,0.005716385],"study_design_codex":"randomized_trial","study_design_gemma":"randomized_trial","domain_scores_codex":[0.9923389,0.0037006873,0.0008576746,0.001642065,0.00072511757,0.0007355271],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9750226,0.013566358,0.0043161125,0.003326815,0.0015535967,0.0022145668],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008025273,0.0024455506,0.003489718,0.0009897975,0.001611023,0.0010792413,0.0020301726,0.004305077,0.011737602],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014876089,0.0013629002,0.0015305781,0.00051759277,0.002650458,0.0011850501,0.00094691594,0.0037413556,0.0012395161],"study_design_candidate":"randomized_trial","study_design_consensus":"randomized_trial","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.5623824,0.38536328,0.00081971183,0.0020517972,0.0003876513,0.00007069033,0.000560889,0.00064641685,0.021842025,0.0005176735,0.00092680013,0.02443065],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.21204801,0.7715909,0.003558046,0.00013976406,0.00045178505,0.000025002459,0.00012077879,0.0013968099,0.008372684,0.0005901248,0.0016247021,0.00008138314],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006303855,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00079303805,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99569494,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000785105,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002366367,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.042442203},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386301508","doi":"10.25071/1497-3170.2469","title":"Discouraging Plagiarism in Assignment Design","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"CORE","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.0821822720682138,"score_gpt":0.3372006687103711,"score_spread":0.2550183966421573,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386301508","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4265815,0.0005373336,0.5249197,0.0031925063,0.00026429174,0.0020100158,0.00007441383,0.0023476272,0.040072627],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9168891,0.000056753932,0.07761188,0.00037355124,0.00008812321,0.0005692232,0.000045042256,0.000107781416,0.004258652],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9336684,0.049098864,0.002841803,0.0031275938,0.010048496,0.0012149616],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.46793324,0.40969935,0.031199442,0.049909275,0.03403366,0.0072251144],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.051567987,0.0008571282,0.0011219484,0.0027433333,0.0041747754,0.0042526787,0.0025131926,0.0026360343,0.007771332],"category_scores_gemma":[0.35453758,0.0009297671,0.00042387767,0.0013779282,0.0029849878,0.0056176386,0.005285797,0.0041557285,0.001401983],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0063679493,0.004541913,0.052943382,0.002187905,0.00023945216,0.0002634783,0.02613589,0.017167479,0.02851888,0.08646442,0.008859798,0.7663095],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0036924735,0.01468024,0.04925464,0.001546967,0.0009775189,0.0016093936,0.009209873,0.42426717,0.07724874,0.3540395,0.06312981,0.00034372733],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008662938,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022590032,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.997364,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002046577,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004907387,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2727208},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386429988","doi":"10.1007/978-981-287-079-7_91-1","title":"Coordinating Ethical Assessment at the Program Level","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Action (physics); Academic integrity; Engineering ethics; Subject (documents); Collective action; Psychology; Political science; Mathematics education; Computer science; Engineering; Law","score_opus":0.136367809326044,"score_gpt":0.4148825358368669,"score_spread":0.2785147265108229,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386429988","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0015229973,0.0015469263,0.086686835,0.034366954,0.0023486912,0.0006524544,0.0002466799,0.0008428849,0.8717855],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.028657192,0.0014918422,0.05964334,0.008235656,0.00095692714,0.00063536275,0.00031937537,0.00086822634,0.8991922],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9831473,0.007644909,0.00064242055,0.0010296579,0.006237192,0.0012986055],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9598645,0.0175626,0.0012278655,0.0027039151,0.014932196,0.0037089272],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.024291506,0.0004045133,0.0006177497,0.0018834808,0.0048239133,0.013543994,0.0023035235,0.0040890444,0.04637577],"category_scores_gemma":[0.040985044,0.00050233747,0.00034977522,0.002320601,0.0035423336,0.0051384754,0.005470963,0.0064284583,0.0261275],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000073826795,0.000050842402,0.0005152889,0.00009233522,0.0000049074256,0.00008880824,0.0020475865,0.00041841128,0.0003401147,0.317038,0.5159295,0.16346677],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000029450143,0.000007558746,0.0003692868,0.00016260472,0.000003312135,0.00008259406,0.001324643,0.0006082533,0.00042088458,0.0758113,0.9211962,0.0000104613155],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008567856,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018390702,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99591094,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0060850303,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.035553757,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15514243},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386846321","doi":"10.1007/s00586-023-07927-7","title":"Publication retraction in spine surgery: a systematic review","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"European Spine Journal","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; McGill University; McGill University Health Centre; Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Impact factor; MEDLINE; Notice; Bibliometrics; Systematic review; Neurosurgery; Surgery; Family medicine; Library science","score_opus":0.12867846027434374,"score_gpt":0.3998955761589875,"score_spread":0.2712171158846438,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386846321","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0010966641,0.99104804,0.000384231,0.0031511884,0.0020717531,0.0012879361,0.00051906623,0.000022734312,0.00041838575],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.03569621,0.9456219,0.0026617562,0.010699756,0.0018427646,0.0024250338,0.00057246577,0.00005628055,0.0004238892],"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","domain_scores_codex":[0.7877413,0.0996571,0.07292422,0.007321899,0.029078279,0.0032772473],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.59655505,0.2612921,0.099459805,0.008152159,0.031377893,0.0031629996],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.11646513,0.003065127,0.016060442,0.01674504,0.0022770825,0.008516165,0.0037068797,0.008767817,0.009030813],"category_scores_gemma":[0.39315242,0.0031649182,0.012730628,0.018409923,0.004455817,0.009858077,0.0055485303,0.0066828756,0.00097129657],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":"systematic_review","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005210187,0.000022868246,0.0014919053,0.95174855,0.015676655,0.00014247133,0.0004255039,0.000036676793,0.00008522041,0.00016125667,0.008354063,0.02133386],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016991132,0.00016038626,0.0046481015,0.8964388,0.07929294,0.00033965855,0.0005754182,0.00007599463,0.000115755145,0.0004758648,0.016093265,0.00008471242],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01010233,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.039074015,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99123216,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010549664,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04033859,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.61593384},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386883513","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0291737","title":"What facilitates or prevents academic fraud in a Colombian faculty of medicine–Protocol of a study using fuzzy cognitive mapping","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PLoS ONE","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Universidad de La Sabana","keywords":"Fuzzy cognitive map; Cognitive map; Cognition; Process (computing); Rationalization (economics); Stakeholder; Identification (biology); Medical education; Psychology; Computer science; Data science; Fuzzy logic; Artificial intelligence; Medicine; Public relations; Fuzzy control system; Management; Adaptive neuro fuzzy inference system","score_opus":0.2744672503596663,"score_gpt":0.42530206774953266,"score_spread":0.15083481738986637,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386883513","genre_codex":"protocol","genre_gemma":"protocol","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"protocol","genre_consensus":"protocol","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.038963985,0.0003210442,0.002659737,0.00097596034,0.00026593625,0.95256853,0.0011199956,0.000027001584,0.003097924],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.014925031,0.00021419965,0.0041233273,0.00035547334,0.0000361979,0.9794047,0.00029770483,0.0000030840893,0.00064028177],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9863492,0.00828112,0.002312877,0.0009020445,0.0011607073,0.0009941376],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97084594,0.01336244,0.002914649,0.002785871,0.007573858,0.002517247],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0331392,0.00113958,0.0018274228,0.0027317577,0.0042367624,0.0022512677,0.0020530636,0.0040793233,0.020926893],"category_scores_gemma":[0.048360553,0.000985342,0.002742998,0.0016995368,0.0031383603,0.0019700965,0.0018226753,0.0031648625,0.0026204102],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.12737226,0.08506963,0.038408943,0.089913,0.0013025813,0.006047341,0.13394943,0.010686689,0.009508057,0.053195845,0.05599065,0.3885556],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.08840607,0.11799597,0.14551844,0.044311028,0.0014360123,0.001158291,0.15586776,0.007107787,0.013508732,0.031111928,0.39199924,0.0015788267],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0047138883,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006722598,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99592066,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009674428,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020105261,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17525893},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386884056","doi":"10.1186/s13643-023-02316-z","title":"The relationship between methodological quality and the use of retracted publications in evidence syntheses","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Systematic Reviews","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Regina; Library and Archives Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Medicine; Quality (philosophy); Sample (material); Evidence-based medicine; Alternative medicine; Library science; Computer science; Pathology; Epistemology","score_opus":0.8673663191410229,"score_gpt":0.5557714441107775,"score_spread":0.3115948750302454,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386884056","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":"methods","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.76535726,0.09330321,0.07281439,0.03515938,0.003215902,0.008727962,0.0037261168,0.00039540522,0.017300371],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9466787,0.0074492,0.038147245,0.0018386897,0.0008514157,0.0037176341,0.00076054013,0.00013086434,0.00042575292],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.28325623,0.3584166,0.25478527,0.013637263,0.08748648,0.002418149],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.027697312,0.78738046,0.13045153,0.019840926,0.032790262,0.0018394847],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.5567698,0.0010730267,0.002485851,0.017193107,0.0028985168,0.010203481,0.003030231,0.0031201998,0.0028379194],"category_scores_gemma":[0.89187694,0.0015459453,0.005295669,0.01805939,0.006902894,0.007994746,0.0088486215,0.0037311139,0.0004302262],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0034104672,0.00035883448,0.7398278,0.04497252,0.011026886,0.0006103823,0.039885543,0.0011632448,0.0026797631,0.0051699597,0.0039088596,0.14698575],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014311163,0.0031903225,0.80354005,0.0697104,0.011999172,0.0044313944,0.01928347,0.010491392,0.0063072196,0.029885054,0.039013114,0.00071725494],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012160572,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020067769,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9968798,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005672164,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008594228,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5465818},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387002596","doi":"10.1111/medu.15239","title":"Why we should view the decision of medical trainees to cheat as the product of a person‐by‐situation interaction","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Medical Education","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Product (mathematics); Medical education; Psychology; Medicine; Mathematics","score_opus":0.13113755775528263,"score_gpt":0.48330675596480344,"score_spread":0.3521691982095208,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387002596","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.051575135,0.0048416834,0.018858638,0.8996038,0.002366446,0.00011123336,0.00006020687,0.0001487831,0.022434171],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.83774364,0.002565054,0.008925306,0.14448148,0.001468938,0.0001251283,0.000038612954,0.000113845665,0.0045379032],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9709427,0.019467844,0.0008472011,0.0026248884,0.003370777,0.0027465757],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94637537,0.026679436,0.008045243,0.0026163808,0.008407969,0.007875577],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.028052507,0.0005598859,0.00071615557,0.0012771271,0.005034415,0.012994889,0.0025574577,0.011420245,0.006012663],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06435001,0.0006740302,0.0011994216,0.000539851,0.034341402,0.012555676,0.0040536313,0.013629597,0.0020798598],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00070715975,0.0007375454,0.10938258,0.0017208781,0.0006220885,0.0046517397,0.24821617,0.0019344072,0.002918807,0.3634424,0.15291205,0.11275425],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032251206,0.0006124443,0.048444927,0.0027335153,0.000338772,0.0042683166,0.19806093,0.0057505756,0.0022175761,0.54216295,0.19440071,0.0006867422],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009367286,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0070005925,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028052507,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0075172456,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0089038275,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14835763},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387695005","doi":"10.3346/jkms.2023.38.e333","title":"Causes for Retraction in the Biomedical Literature: A Systematic Review of Studies of Retraction Notices","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Journal of Korean Medical Science","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":47,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ottawa Hospital; University of Ottawa","funders":"H. Lundbeck A/S","keywords":"Misconduct; Subspecialty; Medicine; Meta-analysis; MEDLINE; Systematic review; Confidence interval; Scientific misconduct; Publication bias; Family medicine; Internal medicine; Alternative medicine; Pathology; Political science","score_opus":0.1576615077346172,"score_gpt":0.4965828687945747,"score_spread":0.3389213610599575,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387695005","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0037009616,0.99447495,0.0002402892,0.00046263935,0.0001522479,0.00037435317,0.00037496522,0.000009072372,0.00021052589],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.06625231,0.9288743,0.001710923,0.00091659714,0.00022867619,0.0012705926,0.0006160724,0.000015861275,0.00011459907],"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","domain_scores_codex":[0.91117454,0.035587683,0.03513481,0.0041290675,0.012929242,0.001044685],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6571104,0.26367167,0.05895739,0.004328691,0.014722438,0.0012095545],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05767701,0.0018909727,0.007193488,0.025243575,0.0014450724,0.004009945,0.0023572978,0.0022275385,0.003155138],"category_scores_gemma":[0.22322404,0.0015002784,0.010730505,0.024704989,0.0025331925,0.0048286263,0.0030200477,0.0017923462,0.00025872054],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":"systematic_review","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025947284,0.000024708039,0.007584814,0.93214285,0.0154335145,0.0001939594,0.0009482373,0.000056998615,0.000109030494,0.00021959246,0.0013839668,0.041642837],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023871867,0.00023409337,0.020314476,0.89106923,0.07062565,0.0008983011,0.0017891765,0.000084105326,0.00028245992,0.0005009179,0.013883861,0.00007896746],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033774984,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010302746,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99777246,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0045544617,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01566845,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30502886},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"systematic_review","genre":"review","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaepi_broad","research_integrity"],"domain":null,"study_design":"systematic_review","genre":"review","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W4387860519","doi":"10.1002/pra2.886","title":"Developing Critical Information Literacy Pedagogies in the Face of Scholarly Misconduct","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Higher Education Commission, Pakistan; Purdue University","keywords":"Information literacy; Misconduct; Critical literacy; Publishing; Categorization; Face (sociological concept); Sociology; Scientific misconduct; Psychology; Public relations; Pedagogy; Medical education; Political science; Social science; Medicine; Computer science; Alternative medicine","score_opus":0.040886121179700044,"score_gpt":0.3629261902064031,"score_spread":0.32204006902670307,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387860519","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5874119,0.010540722,0.14156975,0.14717548,0.0014860681,0.0033990738,0.00008183342,0.0005554281,0.10777972],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.933234,0.00427431,0.051676147,0.005914162,0.0002630223,0.0016857482,0.000043468248,0.000058443624,0.0028506627],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9105954,0.074209146,0.0030480854,0.0019304602,0.00771986,0.0024969757],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.5391075,0.40421388,0.021437606,0.011943016,0.016414484,0.0068834624],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.11064662,0.00047344956,0.0010360684,0.005989671,0.007291783,0.009863077,0.0036099437,0.003323707,0.003969409],"category_scores_gemma":[0.28603527,0.000800793,0.00080995186,0.001836824,0.013341947,0.015124598,0.022297472,0.0076639885,0.0007194274],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007640945,0.0010676874,0.012989166,0.0045001465,0.000075827396,0.0010569874,0.58590305,0.00038928105,0.0015869631,0.05496393,0.0067335675,0.33065698],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018660935,0.00085636333,0.011805373,0.027219553,0.00020763074,0.0019775284,0.5541958,0.0022435128,0.008597061,0.2564298,0.13613115,0.00014957777],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008299656,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017103228,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99667627,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0051257904,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03219632,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5851623},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387964825","doi":"10.1016/j.jslw.2023.101064","title":"Source-based writing of the high- and low-proficiency adolescent writer in the high-school L2 classroom","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Second Language Writing","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Copying; Context (archaeology); Citation; Attribution; Computer science; Information source (mathematics); Writing process; Task (project management); Source text; Second language writing; Psychology; Process (computing); Mathematics education; Linguistics; Second language; Artificial intelligence; World Wide Web; Social psychology; Statistics","score_opus":0.012538982610856968,"score_gpt":0.2737848265360978,"score_spread":0.26124584392524086,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387964825","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9981968,0.0000131525985,0.000090539834,0.000017272612,0.0000034925877,0.0000069636353,0.00009154569,0.0000128118845,0.0015674862],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974483,0.000020294345,0.00027611008,0.000013992625,0.0000020940843,0.000009635682,0.0001491643,0.000015584777,0.002064804],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994598,0.00015595081,0.00006755424,0.00009514816,0.0001694127,0.000052084215],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99327624,0.0027715848,0.0010066079,0.00049874396,0.0019002493,0.00054668676],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007065894,0.0002477069,0.00027193778,0.0011648661,0.000857745,0.0016313631,0.0003831904,0.0004888163,0.005089346],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008643255,0.00018438346,0.00013955275,0.00040472817,0.00040049385,0.00067955785,0.0010650672,0.00078366464,0.00126549],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.002066174,0.002151568,0.6949803,0.0002207998,0.000094856376,0.0034900988,0.1262196,0.0005068926,0.057141837,0.0011638744,0.0029700047,0.10899398],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000658063,0.0010196854,0.910954,0.00008576476,0.0000612877,0.0031137199,0.06175399,0.0021513023,0.016887415,0.00053036667,0.003302993,0.000073588315],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029548162,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0054305294,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005089346,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00043032505,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00039779858,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01702553},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388028159","doi":"10.1257/aer.20210795","title":"Unpacking p-Hacking and Publication Bias","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Economic Review","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":43,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Desk; Unpacking; Contrast (vision); Hacker; Publication bias; Distribution (mathematics); Econometrics; Statistics; Economics; Computer science; Political science; Law; Mathematics; Computer security","score_opus":0.07308008554346349,"score_gpt":0.36325848147340567,"score_spread":0.2901783959299422,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388028159","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.42892304,0.01596607,0.44575912,0.031140989,0.0047933506,0.0020645636,0.01665529,0.0037651977,0.050932437],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92329836,0.001268614,0.065716885,0.0020923521,0.0012345843,0.0006553249,0.0017543134,0.00047801805,0.0035014865],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.77032584,0.1223685,0.04112671,0.021179998,0.041100428,0.0038985063],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.09221886,0.68222153,0.14499874,0.058568083,0.020131206,0.0018616724],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.1762755,0.0009156905,0.0018742925,0.017598907,0.0023184745,0.011196371,0.0021047166,0.0024704612,0.010463234],"category_scores_gemma":[0.69710225,0.0007744727,0.002130261,0.03582236,0.0061263572,0.009673139,0.0061598276,0.0041466476,0.0019075804],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00053596747,0.00010784645,0.68408436,0.0024438086,0.002804547,0.0014702695,0.0062545747,0.0041322755,0.0013386153,0.038109552,0.03551387,0.22320428],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023265545,0.00065185834,0.59741986,0.0025995402,0.0014849426,0.0051290435,0.0062592872,0.028272303,0.0067784386,0.26715592,0.08340373,0.00061239867],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016114931,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018619604,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99752957,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019339593,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0039216555,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.93224514},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388138609","doi":"10.31219/osf.io/wzehf","title":"The relationship between scientific publishing retractions and democracy","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University Medical Centre","funders":"","keywords":"Poisson regression; Democracy; Per capita; Index (typography); Statistics; Gross domestic product; Population; Demography; Linear regression; Poisson distribution; Mathematics; Econometrics; Geography; Economics; Political science; Economic growth; Law; Sociology; Politics; Computer science","score_opus":0.1918582600638338,"score_gpt":0.3835120486702934,"score_spread":0.19165378860645962,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388138609","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9837489,0.0034788991,0.0009913532,0.002383324,0.00010981231,0.00007023874,0.0014822606,0.000046204827,0.007689082],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978381,0.00052261126,0.00027932716,0.000104508305,0.00013757823,0.000023514493,0.00041665055,0.000011817257,0.0006659092],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9835301,0.005226834,0.0038852482,0.0017199547,0.004875057,0.0007627337],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.620987,0.13021728,0.2104079,0.0101269875,0.020900546,0.007360234],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013620266,0.00015843169,0.0004518595,0.00386376,0.00047578514,0.0022066,0.0005911869,0.0004981865,0.0061225956],"category_scores_gemma":[0.18818484,0.0002199603,0.00051214977,0.0061425352,0.0009612275,0.002344244,0.0015621694,0.0013702465,0.0010105444],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014212824,0.000046595145,0.98503566,0.00014958273,0.00013449554,0.00010425382,0.00047794488,0.00021091306,0.000098535485,0.00024672397,0.0008218025,0.012531327],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010449804,0.000099991026,0.9964455,0.00008776222,0.000037204056,0.0005133538,0.0005576034,0.00023563567,0.00009807611,0.00029897335,0.0016048795,0.000010597129],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006835818,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007125926,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9995018,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000666988,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010071219,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07203174},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388536133","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4618396","title":"Intentional Plagiarism: Testing the Risk Aversion Hypothesis of Undergraduate Students in Education","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Université Laval; Université du Québec en Outaouais; Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Risk aversion (psychology); Psychology; Test (biology); Mathematics education; Economics; Financial economics; Expected utility hypothesis; Biology","score_opus":0.03717028704296431,"score_gpt":0.3201570538427854,"score_spread":0.2829867667998211,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388536133","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99939275,0.0000100284715,0.00005217746,0.000055125733,0.000001975897,0.0000073783863,0.000019063866,0.0000011449908,0.0004602948],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995565,0.000007688589,0.00004382859,0.000021431195,0.0000039533256,0.000009599469,0.000037616934,8.2211136e-7,0.00031846427],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965061,0.0014390915,0.00024694589,0.000445337,0.000656703,0.00070584554],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8957075,0.05653802,0.028723791,0.006710579,0.002964928,0.009355126],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0062023913,0.00046296223,0.0006104684,0.0011720117,0.0014415468,0.0030552652,0.0010215377,0.0021890865,0.007892007],"category_scores_gemma":[0.054522876,0.0002980255,0.00046411657,0.001212995,0.0021734526,0.0020906904,0.0026650133,0.0030798758,0.0009605999],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0034596678,0.009957067,0.9588901,0.000048379246,0.00015277024,0.00021335015,0.007433845,0.000719472,0.0013244093,0.0028858434,0.00059289235,0.014322192],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026149687,0.0033304591,0.9743157,0.00002375634,0.00006416317,0.00019663534,0.011188036,0.0052431193,0.0013463171,0.0034817038,0.0005068562,0.000041818716],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005977224,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0040484425,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9978109,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009862233,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014098744,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.032801747},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["research_integrity"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["research_integrity"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W4388976997","doi":"10.5539/ies.v16n6p112","title":"Investigating Teachers and Students’ Perceptions of Academic Plagiarism at the University Level","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Education Studies","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Academic integrity; Psychology; Psychological intervention; Perception; Academic writing; Constructive; Time management; Higher education; Cheating; Likert scale; Pedagogy; Medical education; Mathematics education; Social psychology; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.12724957777623147,"score_gpt":0.4353203316320863,"score_spread":0.3080707538558548,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388976997","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99831736,0.000108320426,0.00014714264,0.00024190021,0.000006633652,0.000011906517,0.000014187073,0.0000063418693,0.0011461596],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991529,0.00011939057,0.00011251199,0.00006949872,0.000006062673,0.00001394845,0.000012388652,0.000002629328,0.0005105733],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.993619,0.0025610668,0.00062510575,0.0003667336,0.0019765776,0.0008515078],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9480495,0.016816664,0.017570546,0.0015534164,0.008573632,0.007436259],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007877713,0.00023318543,0.0005660227,0.0016711862,0.0024306157,0.00494539,0.00072881195,0.00091941265,0.0031771648],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03645963,0.0003735614,0.00042838094,0.0011709164,0.001927917,0.0022683407,0.002411184,0.0017395704,0.0007391664],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000130707,0.0005681378,0.6860492,0.0003217974,0.00004620945,0.00061970565,0.27920365,0.00013183622,0.0024207681,0.00048203318,0.0008341182,0.029191785],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015532883,0.0008226331,0.45588818,0.00025121885,0.00004246569,0.0004864601,0.53307116,0.00037425643,0.0011951007,0.00038193146,0.007406134,0.00006491562],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00315801,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0044081667,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9990806,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019055823,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031070819,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0416618},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["research_integrity"],"domain":null,"study_design":"qualitative","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"domain":"methods","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W4389117698","doi":"10.55016/ojs/ajer.v66i4.69204","title":"Plagiarism: A Canadian Higher Education Case Study of Policy and Practice Gaps","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Journal of Educational Research","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Sociology; Psychology; Art","score_opus":0.1483438786786036,"score_gpt":0.4914591441865995,"score_spread":0.34311526550799587,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389117698","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9526312,0.0025981616,0.0015705039,0.016017467,0.00011292508,0.000640275,0.00028740175,0.000038723345,0.026103467],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9895872,0.001714725,0.0017081979,0.0013412116,0.000026449567,0.00013427957,0.00008169681,0.00001995867,0.0053863497],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9778357,0.008111985,0.0007845063,0.0012578901,0.006008291,0.006001551],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96411836,0.016130937,0.0038298143,0.0012829648,0.008792589,0.005845353],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014881002,0.00065637473,0.00076780666,0.0053233257,0.046794403,0.00851712,0.004731718,0.004027236,0.0035007063],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0347122,0.00067689293,0.0005506271,0.012154845,0.013122142,0.003703514,0.0064743934,0.0038871418,0.0002603013],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000100516816,0.00025583603,0.031485394,0.00042986366,0.000024570858,0.010480113,0.9080922,0.0005162791,0.0005823176,0.011861738,0.0064841,0.029686961],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019892745,0.00008790468,0.01587511,0.00044218663,0.000022103017,0.0011729301,0.93587273,0.00044854585,0.00034051953,0.0007563028,0.044906173,0.000055628007],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96347195,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9824686,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99597275,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.18860096,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.22495121,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.94110787},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["research_integrity"],"domain":null,"study_design":"qualitative","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":true,"about_ca_topic":true,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"domain":"methods","study_design":"qualitative","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":true,"about_ca_topic":true,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W4389155531","doi":"10.1186/s41073-023-00139-z","title":"The quizzical failure of a nudge on academic integrity education: a randomized controlled trial","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research Integrity and Peer Review","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ottawa Hospital","funders":"Magyar Tudományos Akadémia; European Commission","keywords":"Academic integrity; Randomized controlled trial; Nudge theory; Research integrity; Psychology; Political science; Medicine; Social psychology; Public relations; Internal medicine","score_opus":0.18692557954584701,"score_gpt":0.5119654922768404,"score_spread":0.3250399127309934,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389155531","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91108435,0.014641152,0.0028202198,0.0023705086,0.0037913485,0.05730931,0.0017288284,0.00068809144,0.0055662743],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9057188,0.004084834,0.006481942,0.0018233912,0.00083604385,0.07665637,0.00043818643,0.000050009803,0.0039104256],"study_design_codex":"randomized_trial","study_design_gemma":"randomized_trial","domain_scores_codex":[0.994978,0.0028576355,0.0004710126,0.0008246827,0.00044525135,0.00042333402],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99348277,0.003599048,0.0011720652,0.00036173282,0.0004163396,0.0009681303],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006030189,0.0021665762,0.0047690193,0.0012592492,0.0013180131,0.0019491118,0.0018696631,0.0040472336,0.0138781285],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013200224,0.0010298236,0.0025327057,0.00088967895,0.0024458277,0.0018815564,0.0010699435,0.0035932544,0.0012003244],"study_design_candidate":"randomized_trial","study_design_consensus":"randomized_trial","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.95187056,0.016252708,0.00062814157,0.005304916,0.0018450809,0.00004678276,0.00017199987,0.00019321837,0.0005316775,0.0003240159,0.0014705722,0.021360273],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.9439113,0.05146417,0.0014886801,0.0004468032,0.0009706858,0.000012930034,0.000060918264,0.00038071992,0.00020522048,0.0002914038,0.00074573694,0.000021345078],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028064596,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035665587,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9959528,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019664397,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026544174,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04642701},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389294678","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-39989-3_146","title":"Understanding and Addressing Drivers of Corruption in Academic Publishing","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Publication; Misappropriation; Incentive; Language change; Payment; Public relations; Political science; Promotion (chess); Business; Audience measurement; Advertising; Economics; Law; Finance","score_opus":0.35641039343341335,"score_gpt":0.36533715552487644,"score_spread":0.008926762091463092,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389294678","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.025111876,0.018298114,0.007483788,0.056092285,0.0008241354,0.00007083028,0.00017569996,0.00012658586,0.8918167],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6556239,0.032280874,0.0042380346,0.0054204506,0.0017503321,0.00011761836,0.00021435476,0.00018587071,0.30016845],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.996576,0.0013530398,0.00009725761,0.00018504453,0.0014265701,0.0003620592],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9856308,0.009773409,0.0017554242,0.0005266491,0.0016017768,0.00071191264],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036803843,0.00034680136,0.0003870822,0.0028751038,0.0031563516,0.01578382,0.00086905644,0.0019938708,0.018275417],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015841816,0.00031574952,0.0002573318,0.007784421,0.006616518,0.010455728,0.0026633309,0.0041456567,0.002400689],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007816024,0.00004124528,0.0035948674,0.0001184968,0.00000964141,0.00006254564,0.0048496523,0.00039713515,0.00007522768,0.91364443,0.03413441,0.04306445],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005937052,0.000020487409,0.009714717,0.00085904147,0.000016287322,0.00013153905,0.014014825,0.0018080024,0.00038449062,0.66484517,0.30816934,0.00003024221],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0058867447,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009743481,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9980061,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0061686267,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010177393,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06113732},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"other","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W4389306911","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-39989-3_159","title":"Designing International Research to Promote Academic Integrity: From Funding to Educating","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec en Outaouais","funders":"","keywords":"Academic integrity; General partnership; Dream; Research integrity; Public relations; Political science; Engineering ethics; Pedagogy; Management; Medical education; Sociology; Engineering; Psychology; Medicine; Law","score_opus":0.29024431262974687,"score_gpt":0.4635236848789639,"score_spread":0.17327937224921702,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389306911","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004502806,0.012035089,0.04073919,0.06580282,0.0019243774,0.00015269003,0.00004369264,0.00029307022,0.8745062],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.26620927,0.032803815,0.08197477,0.018312389,0.0017013173,0.0010581419,0.00014184974,0.0010017045,0.59679675],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99024135,0.006819524,0.0002098921,0.0003966839,0.001928088,0.0004044326],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9688243,0.024288258,0.0011370974,0.00176382,0.0022875557,0.0016988951],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017997174,0.0005446622,0.0004083079,0.0013632333,0.0035517833,0.012398833,0.0013316885,0.003105859,0.014110283],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027501123,0.00048784108,0.00024537227,0.0016122076,0.010597428,0.010674908,0.0039650244,0.0050027594,0.0043969452],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010355105,0.00004971109,0.00038985413,0.00024865553,0.0000048474885,0.000041397,0.011314133,0.0002983145,0.00037740756,0.7639766,0.089496404,0.13379233],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000084381845,0.000025840454,0.0003778313,0.0007493927,0.000009227855,0.00007438457,0.007303146,0.00027262172,0.0008218093,0.40383285,0.5865116,0.000012827709],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018939856,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0051737824,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9968941,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005339233,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0136691285,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09517932},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389306919","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-39989-3_153","title":"Academic Integrity and Artificial Intelligence: An Overview","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"George Brown College; University of Calgary; Brock University","funders":"","keywords":"Academic integrity; Computer science; Cognitive science; Psychology; Engineering ethics; Artificial intelligence; Engineering","score_opus":0.238991947888491,"score_gpt":0.40635899596182706,"score_spread":0.16736704807333605,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389306919","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00052121346,0.4948599,0.007871131,0.0077391868,0.0019217676,0.00004901998,0.00009490029,0.00013221567,0.48681065],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.015461811,0.6171864,0.0073180175,0.0050402065,0.0053806873,0.00014690115,0.00026108266,0.00017912386,0.34902564],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99931145,0.00016834961,0.000037415928,0.000063455904,0.00035189628,0.00006738388],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991774,0.0005302827,0.000042711683,0.000047534046,0.00015478896,0.000047216472],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00085448107,0.00084179046,0.0007864,0.0052617956,0.0015937279,0.007940852,0.0011666062,0.0034376627,0.01757625],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014219128,0.00051842135,0.00047083068,0.0077994107,0.003947984,0.007918948,0.0023525557,0.003363269,0.007893273],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001253915,0.00005667147,0.0000984834,0.000953338,0.000009559627,0.000094980925,0.0008459718,0.0006309451,0.00022566241,0.5615522,0.2116991,0.22382048],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000022443212,0.0000072354496,0.0001400205,0.00053488364,0.0000029795326,0.0001625191,0.00014990692,0.0001670439,0.00005894804,0.08495322,0.9138137,0.000007323253],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035405988,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0060799913,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9991455,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003566543,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003145716,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.058798432},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389306932","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-39989-3_165","title":"Academic and Research Integrity as Transdisciplinary Fields of Scholarship and Professional Practice","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Transdisciplinarity; Scholarship; Engineering ethics; Stakeholder; Sociology; Work (physics); Political science; Social science; Public relations; Engineering","score_opus":0.1794728103115736,"score_gpt":0.48095187061691946,"score_spread":0.3014790603053459,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389306932","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002095215,0.017250556,0.005304948,0.01696055,0.0009323303,0.00003313754,0.000018164455,0.000046133016,0.9573591],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.21099159,0.017260578,0.005020588,0.0055138767,0.002446193,0.0002235755,0.000050814986,0.00016938846,0.75832343],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99118364,0.0051184115,0.00024456994,0.00047767774,0.0024923258,0.0004833875],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9887888,0.007381285,0.00048785823,0.001171173,0.0014732064,0.00069772184],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0077917827,0.0005678204,0.000721004,0.0023741259,0.006318638,0.02349769,0.0017346399,0.0062762513,0.01328539],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012637217,0.00039673192,0.0002536848,0.0038709405,0.03393715,0.013159559,0.0066990075,0.009101755,0.0039761467],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000018395325,0.000005996626,0.000021035197,0.000021558155,6.5627216e-7,0.000012867526,0.0032277987,0.000031558364,0.000019305744,0.9803295,0.008740614,0.007587313],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000039009333,0.000008143063,0.00012617641,0.00020351348,0.000002256202,0.000107984015,0.0036622246,0.00021350801,0.00009676939,0.65583825,0.33972982,0.000007513884],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031425909,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0065678167,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99372375,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0067335367,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011006157,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.048855484},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["research_integrity"],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"review","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["research_integrity"],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"other","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W4389306943","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-39989-3_158","title":"Integrity as a Field of Scholarship: Introduction","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Research integrity; Scholarship; Scientific misconduct; Scientific integrity; Engineering ethics; Misconduct; Research ethics; Academic integrity; Field (mathematics); Political science; Engineering; Law; Medicine; Alternative medicine","score_opus":0.04734227484024284,"score_gpt":0.3380557335654782,"score_spread":0.29071345872523535,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389306943","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000865256,0.11837658,0.008332141,0.019708276,0.006043472,0.000097369164,0.0001444593,0.000095880714,0.8463366],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.035072327,0.11908564,0.0069166785,0.01392995,0.010798394,0.000328399,0.00023002752,0.0002300523,0.8134085],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993389,0.00025169464,0.000031759082,0.00008505107,0.00021615814,0.000076369906],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99885905,0.0007351331,0.0000463272,0.000046558,0.00021653577,0.000096336924],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011850162,0.0008084298,0.00072696886,0.0032462103,0.0027848524,0.008023865,0.0012386893,0.0044847936,0.029967468],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019888745,0.00043188833,0.0004425352,0.00397074,0.0065116007,0.008363648,0.003572508,0.005185008,0.0076469886],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000045128645,0.000030023837,0.000057542973,0.00023848214,0.0000019898032,0.00005770866,0.0015878476,0.0001686278,0.00007315702,0.8335401,0.12947664,0.034763407],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000018259259,0.000008738889,0.00009466241,0.0003767203,0.0000015191458,0.00008824812,0.00061017927,0.00009372854,0.000032059714,0.16069752,0.83798873,0.0000060881207],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0040721213,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009440427,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.998815,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0043363827,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003774445,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10025114},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389307185","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-39989-3_91","title":"Coordinating Ethical Assessment at the Program Level","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Action (physics); Academic integrity; Engineering ethics; Subject (documents); Psychology; Political science; Computer science; Mathematics education; Engineering; Library science","score_opus":0.136367809326044,"score_gpt":0.4148825358368669,"score_spread":0.2785147265108229,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389307185","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0015229973,0.0015469263,0.086686835,0.034366954,0.0023486912,0.0006524544,0.0002466799,0.0008428849,0.8717855],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.028657192,0.0014918422,0.05964334,0.008235656,0.00095692714,0.00063536275,0.00031937537,0.00086822634,0.8991922],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9831473,0.007644909,0.00064242055,0.0010296579,0.006237192,0.0012986055],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9598645,0.0175626,0.0012278655,0.0027039151,0.014932196,0.0037089272],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.024291506,0.0004045133,0.0006177497,0.0018834808,0.0048239133,0.013543994,0.0023035235,0.0040890444,0.04637577],"category_scores_gemma":[0.040985044,0.00050233747,0.00034977522,0.002320601,0.0035423336,0.0051384754,0.005470963,0.0064284583,0.0261275],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000073826795,0.000050842402,0.0005152889,0.00009233522,0.0000049074256,0.00008880824,0.0020475865,0.00041841128,0.0003401147,0.317038,0.5159295,0.16346677],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000029450143,0.000007558746,0.0003692868,0.00016260472,0.000003312135,0.00008259406,0.001324643,0.0006082533,0.00042088458,0.0758113,0.9211962,0.0000104613155],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008567856,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018390702,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99591094,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0060850303,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.035553757,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15514243},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389316797","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-39989-3","title":"Handbook of Academic Integrity","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Academic integrity; Computer science; Library science","score_opus":0.061343568795157705,"score_gpt":0.3486291111664991,"score_spread":0.2872855423713414,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389316797","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0002670667,0.04356383,0.0037820956,0.00829445,0.0033609858,0.000065525135,0.00022977336,0.00032857768,0.94010764],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.004116109,0.03293135,0.004112009,0.0030836067,0.0012606066,0.00008790055,0.00030144825,0.00024829133,0.9538587],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987412,0.0002796981,0.00006175498,0.00008042639,0.00075732975,0.00007953535],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983071,0.0006780732,0.000095608506,0.0001526254,0.00059180654,0.00017483777],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008539818,0.00074604567,0.0005776533,0.002822641,0.0027309486,0.006119216,0.0010913543,0.0017616116,0.079498075],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0036826443,0.00042275648,0.00032911976,0.0029719975,0.0019786996,0.0045778695,0.0022491352,0.0037914899,0.053956132],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000066892558,0.000023716555,0.00005139683,0.00019117833,0.0000019295503,0.000058256683,0.0008604416,0.00013782736,0.00013583997,0.121332,0.7652471,0.11195368],"study_design_scores_gemma":[5.4636723e-7,0.0000024634392,0.000041572723,0.00012022482,4.774597e-7,0.000079168894,0.00008105754,0.000020579912,0.000023391525,0.007500495,0.9921279,0.000002140904],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028612919,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006398144,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9982384,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022678971,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0043279664,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26594758},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389316864","doi":"10.1590/1980-6248-2022-0034","title":"Construção de autoria no combate ao plágio: um panorama da atividade de pesquisa escolar","year":2023,"lang":"pt","type":"article","venue":"Pro-Posições","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Art","score_opus":0.04026594219729586,"score_gpt":0.3298637848611828,"score_spread":0.28959784266388694,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389316864","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.56421304,0.006064874,0.0053555183,0.030179674,0.00031128933,0.0001840252,0.00011169764,0.00009652863,0.39348337],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9748915,0.0015817937,0.0011272504,0.0005065752,0.000032503518,0.000036749596,0.000034174842,0.000032178134,0.021757206],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99122405,0.005323861,0.00021020923,0.0006112148,0.0016190037,0.0010116897],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9925604,0.0022055062,0.0008149529,0.0007910471,0.001957711,0.0016703769],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008435099,0.00040510256,0.0004454878,0.002299956,0.012307972,0.015532773,0.0015768508,0.0013127658,0.007600088],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010358787,0.00036919926,0.00038149135,0.0030725189,0.01804796,0.0055484646,0.009437485,0.002382676,0.0007670734],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028279117,0.00006402465,0.01548361,0.00021486584,0.000016031963,0.0006436129,0.7173677,0.00016890059,0.00051695853,0.22854097,0.004607032,0.032348085],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006858528,0.000052878768,0.01891889,0.00039237188,0.000014574469,0.000248166,0.71771187,0.00017317591,0.00023585075,0.013708677,0.248511,0.000025576892],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.038349353,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.072530605,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9986872,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012813135,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02161975,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09296626},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389316968","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-39989-3_192","title":"Academic Integrity in Nepal","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Cheating; Academic integrity; Misconduct; Morality; Engineering ethics; Political science; Public relations; Scientific misconduct; Pedagogy; Sociology; Psychology; Law; Engineering; Social psychology; Medicine","score_opus":0.07982288624924568,"score_gpt":0.3446286432909451,"score_spread":0.26480575704169945,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389316968","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0051395865,0.020595081,0.00034357246,0.007870804,0.00045011085,0.0000245548,0.000026426542,0.00002161657,0.96552813],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2039256,0.021574765,0.0004982128,0.004250147,0.0005887521,0.00007986372,0.000048770577,0.000052964704,0.7689809],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991541,0.0003138293,0.00003895712,0.000073343996,0.0002495981,0.00017015351],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988268,0.0005661199,0.00008505347,0.00012569045,0.00027340968,0.00012297522],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012718854,0.00033481058,0.0003968369,0.0013984712,0.009445797,0.011576719,0.00071040186,0.0028799057,0.012962562],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031504536,0.00026706365,0.00015355361,0.0031611926,0.005780926,0.0049335826,0.004040754,0.004509529,0.0030480046],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001773175,0.000049662474,0.00039592365,0.0002713778,0.00000408358,0.00043275778,0.025391327,0.00014461133,0.00013597524,0.8107647,0.07276621,0.08962564],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000046174187,0.000021121616,0.0010059804,0.00055371074,0.000005481642,0.00032896645,0.006011221,0.00010577448,0.00026988858,0.06512768,0.926553,0.000012463084],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013358869,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.030026525,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9971201,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007025175,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008520442,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05097139},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389316989","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-39989-3_107","title":"Academic Integrity and the Canadian University Ombudsperson","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Academic integrity; Misconduct; Mandate; Research integrity; Political science; Promotion (chess); Public relations; Accountability; Psychology; Law; Social psychology","score_opus":0.044532304433111715,"score_gpt":0.26797890647453976,"score_spread":0.22344660204142805,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389316989","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0010397104,0.01790712,0.0005048939,0.055239312,0.0035533293,0.00003596154,0.00008763747,0.00005795201,0.921574],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.035031475,0.009751223,0.0005410233,0.008769056,0.000682686,0.000033604374,0.000046000467,0.000114462244,0.94503045],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9907204,0.0012620123,0.00017956039,0.00062886113,0.0045291437,0.0026801117],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99102235,0.0013042714,0.00018584113,0.0003628742,0.005155147,0.001969518],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0063940585,0.0008929669,0.00096852944,0.0049516754,0.044288725,0.02546632,0.0033535569,0.009599995,0.04069377],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014229555,0.00094040966,0.0006583679,0.007143533,0.01695796,0.0066840886,0.005321518,0.012141507,0.006315669],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000071249324,0.00000941295,0.000105264386,0.000033243574,0.0000020944485,0.00004365291,0.0022635476,0.00006197611,0.000024945846,0.5805009,0.40057558,0.016372353],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000001892452,0.0000018395968,0.0002525305,0.00010273612,0.0000028368543,0.000021548854,0.0013795366,0.000053596574,0.000024435547,0.013788435,0.9843566,0.000013964604],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96769285,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98649615,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9904,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1526434,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2383776,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98281354},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389316999","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-39989-3_98","title":"Supporting Students with Academic Integrity and Ethical Learning: Introduction","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Mount Royal University","funders":"","keywords":"Academic integrity; Attribution; Learning development; Categorization; Psychology; Section (typography); Higher education; Engineering ethics; Pedagogy; Mathematics education; Engineering; Computer science; Political science; Social psychology","score_opus":0.04413198580076413,"score_gpt":0.3764982787035311,"score_spread":0.332366292902767,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389316999","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0011295332,0.053782318,0.012824769,0.015969949,0.009198817,0.00017806361,0.0001966381,0.00024196245,0.906478],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0069160014,0.035015535,0.005214772,0.0064839283,0.003408421,0.0001871271,0.00017292601,0.00016275584,0.94243854],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99975234,0.000056575656,0.000010863177,0.000035207675,0.000111964786,0.000033062344],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996189,0.00014964581,0.00001850488,0.000017587132,0.00012775957,0.00006763113],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00042933962,0.00087864464,0.0004406821,0.0013153345,0.001754871,0.0040998007,0.00089510676,0.0030843136,0.04237224],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00086964126,0.00035061737,0.0004407863,0.001410059,0.0016248038,0.004268599,0.0024035675,0.0037228013,0.015797582],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008003011,0.00013009603,0.00012292215,0.0004637357,0.0000030430022,0.00012916084,0.0014351436,0.0004870204,0.0004511515,0.2048943,0.6238691,0.1680063],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000016323854,0.000013248784,0.00014590094,0.00031792655,0.0000011597456,0.00009906963,0.00029742336,0.00008734564,0.00007702986,0.027226562,0.97172743,0.0000051761162],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002511289,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009612607,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9969157,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019682297,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025812,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14174932},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389317011","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-39989-3_84","title":"Academic Integrity in North America: A Comparison of Canada and the USA","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Honor; Accreditation; Academic integrity; Misconduct; Corporate governance; Political science; Indigenization; Equity (law); Quality assurance; Diversity (politics); Sociology; Management; Law; Engineering ethics; Engineering; Operations management; External quality assessment","score_opus":0.052898768511731635,"score_gpt":0.31372953631121436,"score_spread":0.2608307677994827,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389317011","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.47898424,0.039588995,0.00042118217,0.056339476,0.0006012923,0.00010130138,0.0022124853,0.0001076837,0.42164332],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9345785,0.022488685,0.00037171465,0.004514445,0.00011144295,0.00003351924,0.0007224613,0.00005432285,0.037124958],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9953055,0.0003920784,0.00011541065,0.00020809726,0.0020747138,0.0019042214],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9820416,0.0021798392,0.0015661528,0.0001895485,0.00940892,0.0046140393],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017938467,0.00024860076,0.000441401,0.0083449595,0.012300398,0.010841962,0.0017927736,0.0019365066,0.0070198476],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009674044,0.00027264285,0.0004897747,0.022653142,0.0043330016,0.0025406205,0.0031701066,0.0021552693,0.0004871018],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00040650895,0.00031226763,0.3525843,0.0007692086,0.00014322317,0.0015824569,0.058001436,0.0011539423,0.000499617,0.13622507,0.1969425,0.2513795],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025436184,0.000060513255,0.6636759,0.00083585817,0.0000986063,0.00038557834,0.11860753,0.0005078069,0.00033440194,0.0026517175,0.21271396,0.00010261835],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9947635,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99872655,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9980635,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11498145,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2157303,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8342527},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389317060","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-39989-3_140","title":"Publication Ethics and Graduate Students","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Misconduct; Publication; Engineering ethics; Graduate students; Research ethics; Information ethics; Meta-ethics; Nursing ethics; Applied ethics; Political science; Graduate education; Sociology; Medical education; Pedagogy; Engineering; Medicine; Law","score_opus":0.21788402415302696,"score_gpt":0.4102585732683672,"score_spread":0.19237454911534022,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389317060","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0034139694,0.012715138,0.001926512,0.07237425,0.0025963949,0.00004666073,0.000032412867,0.00007498823,0.90681976],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.07052197,0.0034785466,0.00073982263,0.018076895,0.0024012113,0.00011679233,0.000027853011,0.00013896456,0.90449786],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99100304,0.004771425,0.00025185855,0.0007723154,0.0023161767,0.00088519725],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9888954,0.005040942,0.0005707232,0.0012459882,0.0023620808,0.0018848582],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009127763,0.0006746221,0.00079030794,0.00149154,0.010563569,0.018567268,0.0014011352,0.010672878,0.024661867],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02320583,0.0005802056,0.00029848615,0.0018327667,0.016082587,0.007535011,0.006389916,0.015968485,0.010757574],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010060785,0.00005949604,0.00026846433,0.000038800525,0.0000026123016,0.00005150746,0.005541993,0.00004358294,0.00005074621,0.8391865,0.12609422,0.028651923],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010086918,0.000022883038,0.0003715182,0.00025084813,0.00000355472,0.00010643597,0.0026646256,0.00013730243,0.00014508667,0.29819325,0.6980828,0.000011773293],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002308112,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004852324,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98932713,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0054771756,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009333863,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08250219},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["research_integrity"],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"other","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["research_integrity"],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"commentary","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W4389317114","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-39989-3_113","title":"Writing the Self: Ghostwriter Perspectives and Identity Construction","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Identity (music); Judgement; Cheating; Misconduct; Sociology; Public relations; Aesthetics; Political science; Psychology; Social psychology; Law; Art","score_opus":0.025153939922926104,"score_gpt":0.30405158794477644,"score_spread":0.27889764802185035,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389317114","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.022789244,0.0051334766,0.012450162,0.017469523,0.0009490685,0.000024815987,0.000032373435,0.000082552644,0.9410689],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.784689,0.0025230509,0.00457229,0.0022358822,0.0008253851,0.000080035854,0.000056046458,0.0002841005,0.20473422],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99446636,0.004044627,0.00012452005,0.00033349686,0.00075139233,0.00027969416],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99069464,0.006933164,0.000424189,0.000989458,0.0005621575,0.0003963524],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0054803216,0.00056023774,0.0004785659,0.0021860183,0.010045438,0.019242844,0.0013142639,0.0036757414,0.008826939],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012443223,0.0003171748,0.00023844233,0.0021398754,0.05100354,0.013633123,0.0060334424,0.0063334033,0.0016754046],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000068874965,0.000009341177,0.00007802923,0.000024932624,0.0000010082672,0.00006171713,0.077740006,0.000022927843,0.00007144301,0.9110041,0.005281087,0.0056985146],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012677152,0.00002104157,0.00030154097,0.00029407078,0.000005263709,0.00040413107,0.06896329,0.00026277278,0.0006132291,0.6688759,0.26023123,0.000014833833],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014954646,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018506399,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99632424,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036173551,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026357737,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.029529035},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389317129","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-39989-3_83","title":"Global Perspectives on Academic Integrity: Introduction","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Academic integrity; Misconduct; Research integrity; Key (lock); Section (typography); Engineering ethics; Structural integrity; Political science; Sociology; Computer science; Engineering; Computer security; Law","score_opus":0.04492821389248983,"score_gpt":0.33218286561629334,"score_spread":0.2872546517238035,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389317129","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00067339884,0.09334918,0.003114258,0.03286293,0.0071911393,0.000029869185,0.000094779156,0.00006882704,0.8626155],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.027909078,0.13331158,0.0024502168,0.016925214,0.014422219,0.00013456917,0.00023381796,0.00026197583,0.80435133],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993375,0.00022466078,0.00002845966,0.00007638138,0.00024083281,0.00009213291],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99906796,0.000524537,0.000046484187,0.00006935814,0.0002039148,0.00008776407],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012129985,0.0009298229,0.0005836625,0.0027203357,0.0031324911,0.007449959,0.0010171268,0.004260328,0.04445549],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018539461,0.0003369639,0.00039569003,0.0044555506,0.005609204,0.008687739,0.0041448125,0.0057635084,0.010035098],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006081085,0.000020818334,0.00005345181,0.00029990426,0.000002726098,0.000056319343,0.0017405995,0.00021019517,0.00010476381,0.69122535,0.25475058,0.05152921],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000012463063,0.0000054274064,0.00008887367,0.00030145244,0.0000013535561,0.000053977084,0.00042996378,0.000032329826,0.00003066165,0.07001851,0.9290329,0.0000034277102],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031133548,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007329423,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9957397,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003774906,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028128803,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14871848},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389317290","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-39989-3_99","title":"Teaching Academic Integrity as Good Historical Practice","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Mount Allison University; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Academic integrity; Formative assessment; Scholarship; Engineering ethics; Openness to experience; Discipline; Indigenous; Value (mathematics); Pedagogy; Sociology; Political science; Social science; Psychology; Engineering; Law; Computer science; Social psychology","score_opus":0.07212343811111827,"score_gpt":0.3645992818671519,"score_spread":0.29247584375603364,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389317290","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0009998074,0.005827605,0.0033079449,0.0123901395,0.0009448993,0.000015572234,0.000010898878,0.00004200748,0.9764612],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.15057573,0.0069826427,0.003271282,0.0052066618,0.0019554899,0.00007548819,0.000028353303,0.00016851591,0.8317359],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981414,0.0009657282,0.00004381674,0.00012215669,0.00057912,0.00014781299],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99713194,0.00155726,0.00018540786,0.00032548193,0.00047262368,0.00032727257],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025783265,0.00040871583,0.00031246862,0.0011320943,0.0057952246,0.011051165,0.0011022063,0.0037619825,0.02231949],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005158669,0.00028003042,0.00017111686,0.0013807142,0.016659094,0.0075247693,0.0031671212,0.0073389867,0.005206596],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000011744129,0.000006540568,0.000017012104,0.000017346347,4.0746374e-7,0.000012412694,0.0019547883,0.00005108406,0.000018891913,0.96145785,0.028331064,0.008131477],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002683225,0.0000071516506,0.000069248024,0.00015400958,0.0000015218004,0.000074064716,0.0016071716,0.00014233007,0.00011731795,0.43020362,0.5676157,0.0000052355635],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030232293,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009442251,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.996238,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0056365663,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0059387973,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07466614},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389317328","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-39989-3_122","title":"Academic Integrity Policies in Hispanic South American Higher Education: Status and Recommendations","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Academic integrity; Political science; Misconduct; Higher education; Public relations; Engineering ethics; Public administration; Engineering; Law","score_opus":0.06651282585601474,"score_gpt":0.3620222372898466,"score_spread":0.29550941143383186,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389317328","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.033281274,0.016961904,0.0004905192,0.798802,0.0022372091,0.00007262458,0.00043804199,0.000084290514,0.14763221],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5643191,0.05149069,0.0040256893,0.19926889,0.004454738,0.0004902856,0.0011531215,0.00016754249,0.17463],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9928236,0.002383358,0.00046770074,0.00049621146,0.0023327305,0.0014962812],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9315279,0.035339992,0.0051429626,0.001496843,0.0163634,0.010128958],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018907694,0.000312527,0.0004084798,0.003908085,0.009762731,0.013672717,0.0046394477,0.009087467,0.020990767],"category_scores_gemma":[0.048949018,0.00043379003,0.00056829094,0.0061083823,0.006858108,0.011269287,0.004750817,0.0104754595,0.0019583148],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000087902095,0.000735645,0.046618298,0.00080436305,0.000028626957,0.00034401164,0.014998474,0.0005614679,0.00023996012,0.23063408,0.5160402,0.18890701],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013636696,0.00021097437,0.13161744,0.009905192,0.00020049159,0.0004024261,0.17964709,0.0014482581,0.0017863538,0.118261,0.5562097,0.00017468553],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.19947235,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.31139433,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99091256,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01290229,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07013903,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3966226},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389318793","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-39989-3_90","title":"Academic Integrity and the Affordances and Limitations of Authentic Assessment","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Medicine Hat College","funders":"","keywords":"Cheating; Academic integrity; Academic dishonesty; Outsourcing; Authentic assessment; Psychology; Affordance; Medical education; Pedagogy; Public relations; Engineering ethics; Business; Political science; Social psychology; Engineering; Marketing; Medicine; Curriculum","score_opus":0.10287068104871992,"score_gpt":0.3493928628363063,"score_spread":0.24652218178758634,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389318793","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004142125,0.018180583,0.018760102,0.033505008,0.0007565538,0.000040834642,0.000030061516,0.00010253568,0.92448217],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.59614336,0.022655997,0.015911099,0.0066988617,0.0020263032,0.00023575066,0.000057121186,0.00028987764,0.3559817],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9860336,0.008951122,0.00036164906,0.0005389105,0.0036528257,0.0004618084],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95957977,0.031994123,0.0013589468,0.0031011477,0.0031503863,0.0008155263],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012190153,0.00045511237,0.0005500155,0.002364992,0.0047053187,0.019247577,0.0015757235,0.004102718,0.010749291],"category_scores_gemma":[0.039058268,0.00036328845,0.00027703604,0.0024776338,0.04252598,0.017717402,0.006816065,0.008299134,0.00263023],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000030191525,0.000005876191,0.00006692482,0.00003436106,9.4959637e-7,0.000020535543,0.0031370563,0.00008116421,0.000018502773,0.97417134,0.0062718247,0.016188402],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000025527615,0.000008997211,0.00018447907,0.0002659893,0.000002325897,0.00013063809,0.0023110544,0.00030439455,0.00017185175,0.86412674,0.13248096,0.000010091257],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031553062,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0053891125,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9958973,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004385704,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007252193,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06446844},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389318803","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-39989-3_194","title":"Comprehensive Academic Integrity (CAI): An Ethical Framework for Educational Contexts","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Academic integrity; Engineering ethics; Argument (complex analysis); Information ethics; Research integrity; Applied ethics; Foundation (evidence); Sociology; Political science; Engineering; Medicine; Law","score_opus":0.12085076001807994,"score_gpt":0.42191974642981367,"score_spread":0.30106898641173374,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389318803","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0033897168,0.009010583,0.06393912,0.06745405,0.0019682208,0.00018989298,0.000052505256,0.00013395227,0.853862],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5164236,0.007956361,0.07667771,0.029353384,0.0032973655,0.0014880316,0.00009768215,0.00035301037,0.36435294],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98682714,0.008226954,0.0005438325,0.0007799999,0.0027326078,0.0008894148],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98501045,0.009595484,0.0007760336,0.0014066943,0.0022830493,0.0009283407],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014170667,0.0007514997,0.0005895267,0.0019562067,0.008489304,0.017625712,0.0023026655,0.010780666,0.0064360774],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017641546,0.0004691464,0.000549639,0.0021133663,0.05220712,0.011432127,0.008880957,0.01387268,0.0018817068],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[8.12742e-7,0.0000039949505,0.000019197905,0.000013978766,4.7502763e-7,0.000015721695,0.0016341789,0.000048160855,0.00001331677,0.98781615,0.006925831,0.0035080733],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000029517334,0.000008074213,0.00007227659,0.00022727219,0.0000018267981,0.00012335581,0.0022130245,0.00023546092,0.00011948339,0.83904004,0.15794544,0.000010879609],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0047822976,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008065023,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9892193,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0072658584,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017650522,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07494253},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389318809","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-39989-3_89","title":"Academic Integrity Through Ethical Teaching and Assessment: Overview and Current Trends","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Academic integrity; Engineering ethics; Ethical issues; Experiential learning; Psychology; Higher education; Pedagogy; Medical education; Political science; Engineering; Medicine","score_opus":0.16039365372449274,"score_gpt":0.4492442963303862,"score_spread":0.28885064260589344,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389318809","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0007270122,0.8232156,0.0110899685,0.023513714,0.002614132,0.000036595167,0.00003371356,0.00013244522,0.13863683],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.019404953,0.8752691,0.012102892,0.008901545,0.005481427,0.00010143048,0.00010149812,0.00014956924,0.07848759],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99716467,0.0010555257,0.00014116516,0.00015669028,0.0013529175,0.00012898361],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99152464,0.0062032845,0.00039627444,0.00025480866,0.0012664708,0.0003544533],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0045477194,0.0006602747,0.0007498661,0.0035616765,0.0009792481,0.009015064,0.0015541961,0.003306344,0.010989979],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0057760365,0.0003095008,0.00043176074,0.0051444946,0.0064015035,0.00665275,0.0033130383,0.0059453426,0.00390764],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014681815,0.000059817517,0.0002274041,0.002373595,0.000013989633,0.00007561541,0.0014781741,0.00031541957,0.0002233552,0.24755096,0.11463879,0.63302815],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000031654813,0.000017347647,0.0002656226,0.0027962716,0.0000067924257,0.00036450682,0.00048611456,0.00020995269,0.0001943155,0.06791204,0.92773193,0.000011986354],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021007604,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0046295533,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9966937,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036063932,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0070972247,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.036765218},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389326305","doi":"10.1590/1980-6248-2022-0034en","title":"Authorship construction in the fight against plagiarism: an overview of school research","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pro-Posições","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior","keywords":"Excellence; Work (physics); Polyphony; Sociology; Pedagogy; Mathematics education; Public relations; Psychology; Political science; Engineering; Law","score_opus":0.3555340323673495,"score_gpt":0.48294381065460035,"score_spread":0.12740977828725086,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389326305","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5265198,0.15185334,0.039601576,0.030993903,0.0007249865,0.0008676658,0.000142954,0.00031060426,0.24898522],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9752501,0.014407069,0.005960492,0.000364224,0.00012299074,0.00009880057,0.000029155857,0.00004861927,0.0037185336],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.94803596,0.041856557,0.0022334324,0.0023289185,0.0038328413,0.0017122385],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8341477,0.13400233,0.010732077,0.00878399,0.009986648,0.0023472675],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.044661283,0.00044227942,0.0008581934,0.015936328,0.009692531,0.014323243,0.002159927,0.0025468983,0.0035198359],"category_scores_gemma":[0.051548246,0.0006260665,0.00048198522,0.01418061,0.026046328,0.010369806,0.005684745,0.0026985942,0.00044281306],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000097195596,0.00034239783,0.027781127,0.0034868864,0.00008214836,0.00045685467,0.5584675,0.00032691276,0.0012573303,0.18351236,0.0018557973,0.22233354],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000044084318,0.00035146414,0.041889653,0.00699861,0.0001167446,0.0013373971,0.6014613,0.0008720471,0.0050461045,0.081226155,0.2605473,0.000109110566],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0040092915,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0066674277,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9974531,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011850122,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014014448,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23619425},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["research_integrity"],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"review","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["research_integrity"],"domain":null,"study_design":"design_other","genre":"review","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W4389369181","doi":"10.19173/irrodl.v24i4.7145","title":"The Effects of Exam Setting on Students’ Test-Taking Behaviors and Performances: Proctored Versus Unproctored","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Formative assessment; Summative assessment; Cheating; Test (biology); Psychology; Significant difference; Online learning; Mathematics education; Computer science; Medical education; Multimedia; Medicine; Statistics; Social psychology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.08406127942588637,"score_gpt":0.4888792011270024,"score_spread":0.404817921701116,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389369181","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99866116,0.00014843862,0.0002683059,0.000039721905,0.0000121349285,0.000023160877,0.00004456757,0.000014490528,0.0007879731],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99884903,0.00010826128,0.0004194556,0.000021252627,0.000015049645,0.000044360015,0.00008168944,0.0000065085496,0.00045443242],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99592316,0.0017149315,0.000417846,0.00060279726,0.0010625437,0.00027869726],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9389738,0.036378857,0.01252645,0.0028882718,0.003674122,0.005558486],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030275167,0.00033967738,0.00045613956,0.0008136631,0.00044012477,0.0015041664,0.00054132286,0.00044545595,0.0028932544],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04748173,0.00017405256,0.00041762798,0.0006719595,0.00046521306,0.00087138894,0.001029959,0.0008645411,0.0005705438],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.005630517,0.0037417067,0.791187,0.0005549203,0.00037103493,0.00039537204,0.0058199456,0.00067650696,0.010984432,0.00017872383,0.0008339406,0.17962599],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026791082,0.0041476623,0.9906178,0.00004640753,0.00008262755,0.00012047282,0.0017452405,0.0003501012,0.0020715778,0.00008249874,0.00068437867,0.000024488752],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005649245,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00097074563,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0030275167,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00033430825,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000492733,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.016011238},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389613134","doi":"10.30827/relieve.v29i2.29227","title":"An International Comparison of Discipline Integration of the Commercial Contract Cheating Industry","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"RELIEVE - Revista Electrónica de Investigación y Evaluación Educativa","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cheating; Academic integrity; Payment; Process (computing); Business; Public relations; Political science; Engineering; Computer science; Finance; Engineering ethics; Psychology","score_opus":0.0621831587298306,"score_gpt":0.4433657546753425,"score_spread":0.3811825959455119,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389613134","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7649617,0.008533463,0.0025850458,0.0036476445,0.00020278677,0.00020958857,0.0010458013,0.00011635717,0.21869749],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9858736,0.0024912548,0.00085432635,0.00039864256,0.000095650765,0.000058856895,0.00047497803,0.000093394934,0.009659327],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9780985,0.0070596063,0.0027786845,0.0014430749,0.008215003,0.0024051247],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8430681,0.05256685,0.036963206,0.008931593,0.047180887,0.011289396],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01919924,0.00030548868,0.0006169572,0.024258431,0.0031044155,0.011144082,0.001309779,0.0012578245,0.010091158],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0710421,0.00033343353,0.0007216526,0.028805662,0.0050779385,0.008080174,0.0071117594,0.0022709419,0.002249804],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010587253,0.00038602483,0.4930076,0.0017493283,0.00026185802,0.00088607013,0.14664835,0.0005352641,0.0023405699,0.08428837,0.009101297,0.2597366],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024339786,0.0004123124,0.82246906,0.0011319992,0.000088921865,0.001226425,0.0979418,0.0005848684,0.001083414,0.0046984386,0.07025619,0.00008219991],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008559346,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012942957,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99874216,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0046783066,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004861921,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10153651},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389613144","doi":"10.30827/relieve.v29i2.29295","title":"Examining Recommendations for Artificial Intelligence Use with Integrity from a Scholarship of Teaching and Learning Lens","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"RELIEVE - Revista Electrónica de Investigación y Evaluación Educativa","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Engineering ethics; Sociology; Inclusion (mineral); Knowledge management; Political science; Psychology; Public relations; Computer science; Engineering; Social science","score_opus":0.18365717175032065,"score_gpt":0.4081744376285871,"score_spread":0.22451726587826643,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389613144","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05622047,0.006437016,0.0452319,0.76431704,0.0022342238,0.0006738499,0.00011661267,0.00020100496,0.1245679],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8540859,0.006406942,0.05390465,0.06937247,0.0006135792,0.0010140735,0.00018902514,0.00030264235,0.014110773],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.8151609,0.13239461,0.012377216,0.008542591,0.024217756,0.0073068654],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6202793,0.2789662,0.019166214,0.019958638,0.04474639,0.016883256],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.12133444,0.0009734394,0.0009516212,0.0068137213,0.02244515,0.04909776,0.005413166,0.01697279,0.0051095486],"category_scores_gemma":[0.19986187,0.0009829786,0.001117485,0.006271052,0.07636486,0.04457245,0.022211436,0.024218539,0.001370619],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016712982,0.000101642596,0.003680214,0.0006934369,0.000016957016,0.00048048748,0.27522355,0.0002715346,0.0003327762,0.6716501,0.018613406,0.028919226],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021418897,0.000074316726,0.0019441535,0.0040063844,0.000030115027,0.0003370593,0.52104473,0.00068357855,0.00062611606,0.15775178,0.3134029,0.00007739044],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0133377295,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018785596,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9830272,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03200529,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.070142515,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6416855},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389752195","doi":"10.1007/s40979-023-00147-y","title":"A model for preventing academic misconduct: evidence from a large-scale intervention","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal for Educational Integrity","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"MacEwan University","funders":"","keywords":"Misconduct; Academic integrity; Commit; Intervention (counseling); Premise; Psychology; Discipline; Scale (ratio); Scientific misconduct; Medical education; Political science; Computer science; Medicine; Social psychology; Law","score_opus":0.1686443114703947,"score_gpt":0.47803496889414304,"score_spread":0.3093906574237484,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389752195","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8744851,0.004478287,0.033520773,0.011071507,0.00093930936,0.049422834,0.0010167385,0.0012992593,0.02376633],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9138881,0.0028196722,0.046403006,0.0016274801,0.00008720063,0.032853242,0.00031972714,0.000045540804,0.0019561364],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9705053,0.02282341,0.0012230724,0.0016854994,0.0027484116,0.0010142667],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9130292,0.06719802,0.0064109256,0.0063472497,0.0035903947,0.0034243588],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.036535338,0.0013939788,0.0012933754,0.0021560693,0.0032400244,0.0029434355,0.004926677,0.0032393222,0.01332286],"category_scores_gemma":[0.085876614,0.0007324772,0.0021120983,0.0015983667,0.0032500005,0.0031385708,0.0040138126,0.003913957,0.001208754],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.018044375,0.18697134,0.017477483,0.02591546,0.0018029044,0.0002789586,0.014107157,0.01593053,0.0010077907,0.01960409,0.011812245,0.6870476],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.14668408,0.3895231,0.09216233,0.05283848,0.015871175,0.00056528626,0.036190435,0.11468682,0.010231584,0.062406857,0.07782052,0.0010193627],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015554757,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0134199755,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99676067,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010183068,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020792764,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19321966},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390055333","doi":"10.1002/leap.1587","title":"Academic misconduct, fake authorship letters, cyber fraud: Evidence from the <i>International Political Science Review</i>","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Learned Publishing","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Misconduct; Politics; Publishing; Key (lock); Financial fraud; Political science; Scientific misconduct; Fake news; Business; Internet privacy; Advertising; Public relations; Psychology; Law; Accounting; Computer security; Computer science; Medicine","score_opus":0.13151663464940067,"score_gpt":0.38449660418118675,"score_spread":0.2529799695317861,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390055333","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002085861,0.9514358,0.000122689,0.036327206,0.0007241237,0.000028840057,0.00025659235,0.000005901941,0.009012991],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.047444973,0.9346677,0.00028606036,0.013985019,0.0027052532,0.000053530868,0.00029636244,0.000012627027,0.0005485825],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9783683,0.011790804,0.002516385,0.0010919571,0.0055342605,0.0006982679],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6867999,0.2374937,0.041566163,0.0041592126,0.026625168,0.0033559366],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.029614564,0.00045279946,0.0013446594,0.0122602815,0.0011531063,0.005556234,0.0013842382,0.0038137133,0.0114103705],"category_scores_gemma":[0.12306854,0.00041735652,0.0014522369,0.0122360345,0.004323996,0.0041228835,0.00170193,0.0030892927,0.0018693259],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008855002,0.00031817734,0.023745215,0.076516345,0.0035481846,0.00040354568,0.0015813655,0.0003741703,0.00015912569,0.038469072,0.1959534,0.6580458],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035943696,0.00047288073,0.0653185,0.18502451,0.0044594286,0.0018880519,0.00344212,0.00025978533,0.00052621507,0.03348698,0.7046391,0.00012296787],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00350569,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005199219,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9961863,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0039295144,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011115994,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15661865},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391407882","doi":"10.1016/b978-0-323-95689-5.00075-4","title":"Academic Integrity","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Elsevier eBooks","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Academic integrity; Computer science; Library science","score_opus":0.03617842192026956,"score_gpt":0.31566246138560655,"score_spread":0.279484039465337,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391407882","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0002069744,0.0040684226,0.0006515814,0.007073352,0.0014265635,0.000024431949,0.00011696686,0.00013977023,0.9862919],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.003159069,0.0018173249,0.00022402691,0.00112075,0.0006722791,0.00002175083,0.000077287,0.0001023898,0.9928052],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9950079,0.0011506012,0.0002673524,0.000655445,0.002478892,0.00043975754],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99054855,0.0019953772,0.00063552236,0.0018883658,0.0039143246,0.0010178303],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037451072,0.0011246904,0.0012784067,0.004070412,0.009174376,0.022138711,0.0017658871,0.005626473,0.30974984],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018555736,0.0007306398,0.00063976314,0.005619235,0.005300429,0.009792329,0.0070201773,0.0063230465,0.2446994],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015685717,0.00001958349,0.00013501581,0.00019728212,0.0000052525743,0.000065198416,0.0015451506,0.00006509049,0.00011387669,0.18348294,0.7050841,0.10927083],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000015306025,0.0000027762087,0.000072039424,0.00011014691,0.0000017026713,0.000042965294,0.0001806572,0.000022462758,0.00004491924,0.010125489,0.9893924,0.000002924709],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0050435546,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008191121,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9962549,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004840914,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0080800215,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9845581},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391607910","doi":"10.1080/10508422.2024.2306134","title":"Bibliometric review and mapping analysis of publication ethics research","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ethics & Behavior","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University; Impact","funders":"","keywords":"Scientific misconduct; Originality; Publishing; Misconduct; Bibliometrics; Research ethics; Engineering ethics; Political science; Intellectual property; Research integrity; Social science; Library science; Sociology; Public relations; Medicine; Law; Alternative medicine; Engineering; Computer science; Qualitative research","score_opus":0.40416994958953883,"score_gpt":0.552038113106941,"score_spread":0.14786816351740212,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391607910","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5192237,0.10420901,0.15257737,0.00745425,0.001722017,0.02475724,0.04893097,0.0020226622,0.13910282],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8353684,0.022465285,0.11071297,0.0003108859,0.00053248095,0.015060961,0.0112419985,0.00024365599,0.0040634517],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","domain_scores_codex":[0.85823816,0.06355499,0.027658736,0.0064511625,0.042431828,0.0016650194],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.64329404,0.24929196,0.035301037,0.015163756,0.0554152,0.0015340872],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06307944,0.00097541866,0.0032510662,0.16796757,0.0029838374,0.006944384,0.0017341371,0.0010210255,0.006649763],"category_scores_gemma":[0.29289612,0.0005226436,0.0031236766,0.19250536,0.0017999585,0.0043391422,0.0043574683,0.00069560925,0.0011736724],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00037873595,0.00023988896,0.21213226,0.05425066,0.0047153267,0.00089989894,0.0142215,0.0039233244,0.0016627616,0.03899114,0.022550264,0.64603436],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032474071,0.0007703716,0.54560447,0.023976153,0.010185105,0.003508105,0.034912452,0.027917832,0.007317622,0.06849617,0.27650547,0.00048145765],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036823398,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0040957825,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.998979,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005342486,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02083692,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33359993},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391773556","doi":"10.4018/979-8-3693-0240-8.ch006","title":"(A)I'm a Believer, but (A)I'm Also Responsible","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Advances in educational marketing, administration, and leadership book series","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"SAIT Polytechnic","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Theology","score_opus":0.0406752331394599,"score_gpt":0.31838439966036736,"score_spread":0.27770916652090744,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391773556","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0076284404,0.0058801146,0.0102770375,0.06420039,0.006044316,0.000071175105,0.00009581833,0.0004338175,0.9053688],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.054761082,0.004841457,0.004911355,0.013589478,0.0008074472,0.000036052927,0.00007485116,0.00016394978,0.9208143],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.999432,0.00008958251,0.000011751273,0.000054995362,0.0003405057,0.00007108518],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99917465,0.0002913594,0.000046210105,0.000051130803,0.0002722952,0.00016432225],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006901957,0.00032466545,0.00021389817,0.00043391105,0.0030717726,0.0043812194,0.00056471187,0.0016298983,0.026665665],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023731783,0.00018493032,0.00023447204,0.0004202556,0.002840772,0.004252745,0.0016854247,0.0040511237,0.012367297],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014919683,0.00004811817,0.00090808177,0.00019094955,0.0000067484193,0.00035621563,0.026101267,0.00018134566,0.0020901742,0.20465073,0.6132977,0.15215369],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000017158836,0.000016808808,0.00048045054,0.00011390293,0.000003125788,0.00044702995,0.0044600694,0.0001319222,0.00028799733,0.008438474,0.9856097,0.000008909273],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009246733,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.025516376,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9983701,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020737988,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002339596,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0892055},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391773574","doi":"10.4018/979-8-3693-0240-8.ch001","title":"Fostering Academic Integrity in the Age of Artificial Intelligence","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Advances in educational marketing, administration, and leadership book series","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Academic integrity; Psychology; Cognitive science; Engineering ethics; Artificial intelligence; Computer science; Engineering; Social psychology","score_opus":0.12629153648934602,"score_gpt":0.37025829038313574,"score_spread":0.24396675389378972,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391773574","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.27229032,0.020590615,0.011025805,0.13167161,0.0007832999,0.0000877335,0.00008245967,0.00016781536,0.5633004],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95665336,0.0069632623,0.0032182818,0.005792609,0.00027193708,0.000052156625,0.0000399142,0.000036287023,0.026972232],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9891046,0.007013557,0.00023505716,0.00027189052,0.0025237056,0.00085108326],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9802577,0.010999449,0.0026478302,0.0017832299,0.0024942998,0.0018174725],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00862198,0.00017428026,0.00025824612,0.0012229064,0.0066786613,0.014955729,0.00076411327,0.0019124454,0.0031238329],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021879032,0.00018107556,0.00014020444,0.0026483047,0.014875984,0.012619588,0.0068787625,0.0040347017,0.0008781537],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042396943,0.000099049656,0.013119609,0.00026206343,0.000011637486,0.0002815484,0.15668637,0.00041581035,0.0004761219,0.56699204,0.04935385,0.21225952],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000063389107,0.00007763068,0.018575983,0.0009015624,0.000010882762,0.00041367093,0.110506006,0.0005858779,0.0009076937,0.20267978,0.6652922,0.000042406176],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004246411,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007899235,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9980875,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0072257956,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0144240465,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.052427053},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391966578","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-54144-5_99","title":"Teaching Academic Integrity as Good Historical Practice","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Springer international handbooks of education","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Mount Allison University; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Academic integrity; Computer science; History; Engineering ethics; Engineering","score_opus":0.03973447956887382,"score_gpt":0.37496968350644594,"score_spread":0.3352352039375721,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391966578","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.001770289,0.020885741,0.0063147345,0.026752863,0.0014418953,0.000023473696,0.000018500004,0.00009493421,0.94269764],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.28654382,0.026699279,0.006681948,0.007781577,0.003990118,0.00014609114,0.00005169479,0.00026805492,0.6678375],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.997136,0.0017323137,0.000082990744,0.00016349493,0.00068486243,0.00020036347],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953459,0.0027191576,0.00032561296,0.0004939973,0.0005873428,0.0005279709],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0040819393,0.00048077933,0.00045011088,0.0013619706,0.004843851,0.013862104,0.0011143973,0.0037670399,0.018577872],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00802994,0.0003768135,0.00019114859,0.0018025142,0.02262404,0.009226223,0.0035764298,0.008081676,0.003875958],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000017819723,0.000011305931,0.000032472497,0.00002853348,7.0319487e-7,0.000011862827,0.0033622712,0.00007198782,0.00002053299,0.95528054,0.026287492,0.014890563],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000035912792,0.000011411319,0.00010398219,0.0002780926,0.000001925998,0.000053886324,0.0024456985,0.00014548225,0.000086617125,0.48329017,0.51357245,0.0000067678343],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026124897,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0052099093,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.996233,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005403924,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007913159,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.062149167},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391966586","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-54144-5_153","title":"Academic Integrity and Artificial Intelligence: An Overview","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Springer international handbooks of education","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"George Brown College; University of Calgary; Brock University","funders":"","keywords":"Academic integrity; Computer science; Engineering ethics; Engineering","score_opus":0.12769370288939016,"score_gpt":0.4125564895320779,"score_spread":0.2848627866426877,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391966586","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00033396948,0.8981938,0.0052917297,0.004647669,0.0013241775,0.00002985836,0.000052395568,0.00009152426,0.09003493],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.007619728,0.9336666,0.0044049597,0.0025314984,0.0042891125,0.000087743305,0.00013683898,0.00006351889,0.047199998],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99875414,0.0003007213,0.00008689498,0.00011460744,0.00061738375,0.00012632684],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986426,0.0008662462,0.00008562132,0.00007040204,0.0002506907,0.0000844632],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001328276,0.0011639284,0.0012851323,0.006831787,0.0012597224,0.008421486,0.0013793671,0.003994535,0.010652782],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018235771,0.00078216655,0.00063492794,0.010533876,0.0041567413,0.009342871,0.0027228934,0.003838709,0.0052818875],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028183098,0.00013055092,0.00028034684,0.0028643769,0.000026696405,0.00014184596,0.0008764223,0.0011056433,0.00036901713,0.3187662,0.20102368,0.474387],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004850045,0.00001893367,0.0003778776,0.0012924669,0.000007356466,0.00028720612,0.00023690672,0.00028413767,0.00007729295,0.06901232,0.92838556,0.000015017212],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031475197,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00430213,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9960055,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033003134,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004044125,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03563708},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391966656","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-54144-5_107","title":"Academic Integrity and the Canadian University Ombudsperson","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Springer international handbooks of education","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Academic integrity; Misconduct; Mandate; Political science; Research integrity; Promotion (chess); Accountability; Public relations; Psychology; Law; Social psychology","score_opus":0.027425203440573344,"score_gpt":0.2958552233248502,"score_spread":0.26843001988427684,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391966656","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0023547695,0.031591278,0.000673972,0.1361548,0.005858752,0.00005595081,0.00014065094,0.00009011099,0.8230798],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.07099714,0.016927954,0.00088066707,0.016826248,0.0011051167,0.000049051414,0.00007939917,0.00016060824,0.89297384],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9834329,0.0021452785,0.00033646167,0.0011431375,0.007895866,0.005046309],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9821639,0.0021042335,0.0003601064,0.0006812754,0.009839098,0.0048512993],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0101627335,0.0009389257,0.0012177541,0.00509686,0.04859582,0.028952274,0.0042423625,0.011343234,0.038561348],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022536453,0.0012347896,0.00080635067,0.007397728,0.0217192,0.007975252,0.0071502496,0.013783984,0.005167797],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015074762,0.000016546821,0.00023517472,0.000051219813,0.000003772146,0.00006954769,0.0033914982,0.000090990514,0.000041269668,0.5640277,0.40601203,0.026045285],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000031706188,0.0000036883232,0.0004790904,0.0001520669,0.000004012872,0.000026118922,0.0021199177,0.000067628935,0.000031595097,0.012381217,0.98470795,0.000023683613],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9801894,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9903527,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98865676,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.19165608,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.3831839,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9375644},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391967106","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-54144-5_134","title":"Academic Integrity, Ableist Assessment Design, and Pedagogies of Disclosure","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Springer international handbooks of education","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Academic integrity; Ableism; Sociology; Political science; Engineering ethics; Gender studies; Engineering","score_opus":0.0660191321680491,"score_gpt":0.3948043763536285,"score_spread":0.32878524418557936,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391967106","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01305994,0.005268045,0.17581289,0.022533543,0.00083538465,0.00045333416,0.00014425752,0.0006326421,0.7812599],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.57337725,0.006206515,0.10970653,0.003896212,0.0005406206,0.0012841899,0.00023218276,0.00057520124,0.30418143],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.969231,0.018770494,0.0013151491,0.0015032958,0.008314376,0.0008658228],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.92947537,0.051832214,0.0028448382,0.005995966,0.008181488,0.0016701373],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.024571734,0.0006602489,0.00062972493,0.0030415661,0.0033290994,0.01592105,0.0024922465,0.0028877943,0.025593534],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09784374,0.0004965196,0.00049023994,0.0022984333,0.011959374,0.014300575,0.0062708175,0.004350446,0.0043616593],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000047362144,0.000092849325,0.0013110355,0.00026859975,0.000009276077,0.000053172284,0.009229773,0.00096005114,0.0002306894,0.74729806,0.019515704,0.22098346],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027031343,0.00012084974,0.001761063,0.00094387046,0.00001933074,0.00025720277,0.007679217,0.002550646,0.002101187,0.7428147,0.24168344,0.000041376832],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017061926,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0032968395,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9971122,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0044565066,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008829581,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12994927},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391967145","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-54144-5_135","title":"An Equitable Approach to Academic Integrity Through Alternative Assessment","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Springer international handbooks of education","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Athabasca University","funders":"","keywords":"Academic integrity; Computer science; Political science; Library science","score_opus":0.07662110272384576,"score_gpt":0.4151610923136337,"score_spread":0.3385399895897879,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391967145","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0031689326,0.0046481737,0.29225144,0.023380103,0.0009318591,0.00016057829,0.0000490819,0.00018844106,0.6752214],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.48770133,0.0061965627,0.23895708,0.004001762,0.0016487411,0.0006313854,0.00011858132,0.0003746483,0.26036996],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.964997,0.017041696,0.0014606753,0.001530141,0.014044974,0.00092555577],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9641931,0.017864179,0.0016880792,0.0071240715,0.008445203,0.0006853724],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022547448,0.0009508296,0.0010362002,0.0052942634,0.004861531,0.01764981,0.0039866623,0.0061628846,0.014166771],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05099538,0.00065240666,0.0008994301,0.003529038,0.028016,0.022263931,0.011150064,0.009312872,0.003095939],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003004363,0.000008440132,0.000039663664,0.000024038422,0.0000026319826,0.0000159165,0.00049195345,0.00034946157,0.00003227263,0.97582346,0.0027024266,0.02050669],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000024480098,0.000008844253,0.000040033843,0.000097636876,0.0000034836664,0.000054477758,0.0002560262,0.00095078873,0.00016085798,0.96733797,0.031078698,0.000008675655],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017137121,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023672094,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9938371,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005432624,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0077598793,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11924374},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391967165","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-54144-5","title":"Second Handbook of Academic Integrity","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Springer international handbooks of education","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Academic integrity; Computer science; Library science","score_opus":0.03258870017681525,"score_gpt":0.3530141259678405,"score_spread":0.32042542579102523,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391967165","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00025829385,0.049067058,0.005779233,0.0073015215,0.0053966995,0.00007313211,0.00022457488,0.00035850907,0.9315409],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.002262267,0.010626097,0.001385311,0.0015177572,0.0011498244,0.00005402809,0.00013978701,0.00016527723,0.98269963],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987239,0.00024214046,0.00006045809,0.00015270297,0.0007149898,0.00010574793],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99846554,0.0004730277,0.00006642237,0.00019969602,0.00062787096,0.0001674371],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009748325,0.0012324209,0.0011174105,0.0051138434,0.002786218,0.007383296,0.0014664116,0.0027627884,0.10438131],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0041376757,0.0005920584,0.00053344516,0.0039180247,0.002694287,0.006366052,0.0030504267,0.0049891844,0.070061944],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000107343485,0.000033343313,0.000054490123,0.00018279126,0.0000029046118,0.00003708905,0.0005789618,0.00013227566,0.0001589812,0.12505318,0.7381331,0.13562217],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000010677112,0.000004750932,0.000050068877,0.00010532702,9.4651904e-7,0.00005979256,0.00006758663,0.000034677927,0.000049415663,0.013416234,0.9862068,0.0000033304539],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003170593,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0069520003,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9972372,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026847625,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0048475647,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34919024},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391973776","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-54144-5_92","title":"Academic Integrity and Accommodations: The Intersections of Ethics and Flexibility","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Springer international handbooks of education","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Academic integrity; Cheating; Flexibility (engineering); Academic dishonesty; Data integrity; Face (sociological concept); Medical education; Psychology; Sociology; Computer science; Library science; Computer security; Management; Medicine; Social psychology","score_opus":0.09694377750869877,"score_gpt":0.4033911120094982,"score_spread":0.3064473345007994,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391973776","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0058841524,0.023824785,0.015150102,0.0483089,0.0008992949,0.000032681175,0.00002957097,0.00007737408,0.90579313],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7193843,0.020100666,0.0068630804,0.006718529,0.0021916118,0.00017679905,0.000053711057,0.00023390837,0.24427737],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9904248,0.0062721893,0.00028012498,0.00044352186,0.0019588624,0.00062039186],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9872255,0.008608055,0.0007285684,0.0015468169,0.0011803494,0.0007106077],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0070878426,0.00049734855,0.0006938841,0.0017880677,0.0057419133,0.01963279,0.0015684853,0.0041983947,0.011955769],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019323934,0.00034932533,0.0003579471,0.0028246657,0.05062421,0.016623644,0.0077788606,0.0073938463,0.0021762839],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000027558615,0.000004368862,0.000036189806,0.000018372348,7.5273044e-7,0.000012649596,0.0028860325,0.000066932764,0.00001301127,0.9866933,0.0038343444,0.0064312103],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000031817456,0.0000075314174,0.00012546308,0.00020053206,0.0000016305505,0.00005960851,0.0034347686,0.00016184046,0.00007130144,0.8417573,0.1541683,0.000008574867],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031658013,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0040222527,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9958016,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005594905,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00884705,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0405941},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391973785","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-54144-5_89","title":"Academic Integrity Through Ethical Teaching and Assessment: Overview and Current Trends","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Springer international handbooks of education","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Academic integrity; Engineering ethics; Current (fluid); Research integrity; Political science; Psychology; Engineering; Electrical engineering","score_opus":0.08917366203978644,"score_gpt":0.44724958317748903,"score_spread":0.3580759211377026,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391973785","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00062285154,0.8961083,0.010107416,0.021886513,0.002132749,0.00003386277,0.00002541187,0.00011708651,0.06896575],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.017498774,0.92559415,0.010372332,0.0066835526,0.0045091314,0.00009335806,0.00007660465,0.00010593634,0.035066098],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99532676,0.0018635013,0.000272343,0.00024038795,0.0020672737,0.0002297513],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98784095,0.008689659,0.00067149464,0.00037810463,0.0018366601,0.00058308546],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0069533237,0.00070301205,0.00097022275,0.0038482556,0.0010152177,0.010607833,0.0016139261,0.0035683247,0.009034194],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008687,0.00037197486,0.0005259153,0.0058084936,0.0067804907,0.007807089,0.0041247224,0.006874431,0.0034461482],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018159912,0.00007775243,0.00028005883,0.0028931755,0.000017001354,0.00007302744,0.0016637018,0.00031696275,0.00020404202,0.1729997,0.09185286,0.7296035],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000048079337,0.000027729875,0.00036054399,0.004038072,0.000009524286,0.00043297966,0.00070503453,0.00022857937,0.000231261,0.06484498,0.9291001,0.000016432685],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017294597,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0032558755,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99643165,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035590914,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009033958,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.036773145},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391973818","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-54144-5_84","title":"Academic Integrity in North America: A Comparison of Canada and the USA","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Springer international handbooks of education","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Honor; Academic integrity; Accreditation; Misconduct; Political science; Corporate governance; Indigenization; Diversity (politics); Equity (law); Sociology; Law; Management; Engineering ethics; Engineering","score_opus":0.03362133729940023,"score_gpt":0.3335364444404732,"score_spread":0.29991510714107295,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391973818","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.36621693,0.07833771,0.0005912601,0.08667179,0.0010199422,0.0001420305,0.00340829,0.00015973549,0.46345234],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.898301,0.04662351,0.00067445467,0.007079898,0.00017578034,0.000052191997,0.0011563735,0.00009068724,0.045846127],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9940899,0.0004343312,0.00016711817,0.00028405263,0.002737988,0.002286622],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9789605,0.002093218,0.001725862,0.00021444826,0.011703845,0.005302032],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022588035,0.00030677376,0.00055873336,0.0096776625,0.012389605,0.01292728,0.00195501,0.002062883,0.0089823045],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010363725,0.0003498948,0.0006282194,0.027894458,0.0047428673,0.003083497,0.0036212192,0.0025158334,0.0005915885],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005017338,0.00029315928,0.27568105,0.0012046349,0.00017460207,0.0014586372,0.04392167,0.0012707654,0.0005315374,0.15244386,0.2274629,0.29505554],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003475606,0.00007154635,0.5896935,0.0013979131,0.00013667425,0.0004425023,0.10883752,0.0004588949,0.0003617298,0.003064773,0.29537374,0.00012651736],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9943176,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99865425,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99793714,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11843196,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.25861403,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.85928804},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391973838","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-54144-5_91","title":"Coordinating Ethical Assessment at the Program Level","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Springer international handbooks of education","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Action (physics); Academic integrity; Engineering ethics; Subject (documents); Psychology; Political science; Mathematics education; Computer science; Engineering","score_opus":0.06315036537739765,"score_gpt":0.4120011229626539,"score_spread":0.34885075758525624,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391973838","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0053941496,0.0043298383,0.26855573,0.083858185,0.0061753523,0.003235183,0.00057392806,0.0023676793,0.62550986],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.09294428,0.0042848242,0.19177793,0.014595956,0.0035281251,0.0034952648,0.0011023256,0.0023490717,0.6859222],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.942449,0.03057813,0.0033341951,0.003271576,0.016789747,0.0035774752],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.85755557,0.059905224,0.0063622748,0.011878373,0.04896676,0.0153316725],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.074167185,0.00054362096,0.0012027893,0.0035073264,0.005286863,0.01983557,0.0031364171,0.004731768,0.042021472],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11766497,0.00066295103,0.00051437994,0.0034274713,0.0046224436,0.0069534127,0.00897652,0.0075558284,0.024432255],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028198874,0.00011435051,0.001395571,0.00022536491,0.000015200537,0.00017613712,0.0040630517,0.0006465837,0.00090627646,0.17815314,0.42743775,0.38683832],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000082241795,0.000022603503,0.0008500714,0.0003977424,0.000008458532,0.0001325873,0.0027606569,0.001113242,0.00085156923,0.07420154,0.9196309,0.00002243342],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004845115,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007583479,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9952682,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006005098,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.061371196,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.39223826},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391973845","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-54144-5_83","title":"Global Perspectives on Academic Integrity: Introduction","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Springer international handbooks of education","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Academic integrity; Misconduct; Research integrity; Structural integrity; Engineering ethics; Key (lock); Section (typography); Political science; Academic dishonesty; Epistemology; Sociology; Computer science; Engineering; Computer security; Law; Higher education; Philosophy","score_opus":0.028134523612665358,"score_gpt":0.34894384805639156,"score_spread":0.32080932444372623,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391973845","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000982919,0.38558087,0.003706538,0.07714662,0.014524906,0.000036550096,0.00015988668,0.000107651314,0.51775414],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.03500838,0.4651517,0.0031829644,0.029005729,0.033409476,0.00016288184,0.00035661756,0.00024220478,0.43348014],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990889,0.00031407978,0.00004916737,0.00011839651,0.00030063538,0.00012880826],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986523,0.0007386873,0.00008286936,0.00009267397,0.00028308082,0.00015038023],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016032044,0.0010974888,0.00078134076,0.0033235082,0.0026543683,0.008098321,0.0011086388,0.005054096,0.032602556],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023195646,0.00043934447,0.0004946341,0.0050441935,0.0059796753,0.010106035,0.004652837,0.0067737116,0.0076439786],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014164905,0.000046525533,0.00012663509,0.00078883645,0.000006267035,0.0000843553,0.0026770225,0.00031106969,0.00016527438,0.53767645,0.35813317,0.09997025],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000001767272,0.000009526451,0.00015860183,0.0005388969,0.0000021047929,0.00006257095,0.0005592997,0.000029279272,0.000025956775,0.048481803,0.95012534,0.0000049451055],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025048652,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004395843,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9949459,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003652671,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035719443,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10906637},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391974059","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-54144-5_158","title":"Integrity as a Field of Scholarship: Introduction","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Springer international handbooks of education","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Research integrity; Scholarship; Scientific misconduct; Scientific integrity; Engineering ethics; Misconduct; Research ethics; Academic integrity; Field (mathematics); Political science; Section (typography); Sociology; Engineering; Law; Computer science; Medicine; Alternative medicine","score_opus":0.027746300178524308,"score_gpt":0.3546594116647696,"score_spread":0.3269131114862453,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391974059","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.001203715,0.37442863,0.011145434,0.038174693,0.0122215785,0.00011872244,0.00024401092,0.0001642492,0.56229883],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.048368968,0.3267997,0.010882253,0.021915687,0.025103519,0.00043850407,0.0003936947,0.0002852569,0.5658124],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991943,0.00029904512,0.0000491077,0.00011833133,0.00024226213,0.00009692828],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987295,0.00077439356,0.00006480338,0.0000548983,0.00024210972,0.00013418701],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013649155,0.00095231476,0.0009064245,0.0033419954,0.0022968363,0.008326115,0.0014163171,0.0047625736,0.0255811],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023347216,0.0005274729,0.0005463757,0.003908332,0.0065100524,0.009426346,0.003769607,0.0053880312,0.0067330846],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009041355,0.000051115014,0.00011888543,0.00049366103,0.000003867495,0.00007841647,0.002352851,0.00021829414,0.00012082337,0.7490836,0.18782267,0.059646897],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000022093268,0.000011737558,0.00014527586,0.0005269163,0.0000018237512,0.00009368334,0.0007007684,0.00007142205,0.000024196113,0.12339079,0.8750239,0.0000072637786],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032756266,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006203779,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9952374,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004052407,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0042421916,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08557725},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391974063","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-54144-5_165","title":"Academic and Research Integrity as Transdisciplinary Fields of Scholarship and Professional Practice","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Springer international handbooks of education","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Transdisciplinarity; Scholarship; Engineering ethics; Stakeholder; Sociology; Work (physics); Political science; Social science; Engineering; Public relations","score_opus":0.09371661072015015,"score_gpt":0.47140595065880225,"score_spread":0.3776893399386521,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391974063","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0024884231,0.049063668,0.011866571,0.03265028,0.00214203,0.00006180458,0.000038063557,0.00012496364,0.90156406],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.17226683,0.03768962,0.009011513,0.007021099,0.0041984613,0.00029872725,0.000077243465,0.00026696053,0.7691695],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99028933,0.0054274546,0.00036859277,0.00047871933,0.0028914157,0.0005444666],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9853873,0.0097375065,0.00072733633,0.0014710572,0.0017664626,0.00091034255],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009298738,0.00064731954,0.0009446277,0.0025300665,0.0049278927,0.023677992,0.0016896937,0.0055683246,0.017076103],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01787118,0.00052429514,0.00030349204,0.0039793053,0.029422658,0.014527057,0.0070682582,0.009206686,0.004971434],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002922343,0.000009986813,0.000035333836,0.000051278566,0.0000012348997,0.000017305765,0.004634637,0.000049327522,0.00003056533,0.9599964,0.016977947,0.018193016],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000045497504,0.000012012104,0.00015174698,0.00031987356,0.0000026791404,0.00011635499,0.0031613684,0.00020335155,0.000091861446,0.5513914,0.44453484,0.000009906551],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023176079,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0043078084,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9944317,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004902904,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012138709,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05712527},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"domain":"methods","study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["research_integrity"],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"other","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W4391974065","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-54144-5_146","title":"Understanding and Addressing Drivers of Corruption in Academic Publishing","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Springer international handbooks of education","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Publication; Misappropriation; Incentive; Language change; Payment; Public relations; Political science; Promotion (chess); Audience measurement; Business; Advertising; Law; Economics; Finance","score_opus":0.1888985625839676,"score_gpt":0.3777093302725225,"score_spread":0.18881076768855493,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391974065","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09162564,0.02252294,0.013873333,0.11075582,0.0008528243,0.000129237,0.0002528562,0.00020011769,0.7597873],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9008942,0.015499927,0.0023188696,0.0028209083,0.00087487645,0.000087423214,0.00012114209,0.00014005702,0.07724267],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9925079,0.0030218146,0.00027248848,0.000348033,0.002799761,0.0010501026],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.971934,0.017708141,0.0044098133,0.001192543,0.0031163907,0.0016391127],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0066191508,0.00033104658,0.00044234158,0.0037411829,0.0042380197,0.022545226,0.0009893704,0.0024159097,0.016854227],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029796042,0.00048034784,0.0002949048,0.008804029,0.009538901,0.017461985,0.0040786997,0.0056118164,0.0018310839],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012546262,0.000057859772,0.00810121,0.00010085999,0.000011764369,0.00008292324,0.008131668,0.00042520574,0.00007925944,0.92727333,0.018863283,0.03686011],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010052601,0.00003642275,0.016897673,0.0011088657,0.000023738512,0.00014577425,0.028729947,0.0024723138,0.0005025661,0.6891493,0.2608764,0.000047049798],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0069420435,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008538641,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9975841,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00769801,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014215876,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.056383014},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391974110","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-54144-5_194","title":"Comprehensive Academic Integrity (CAI): An Ethical Framework for Educational Contexts","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Springer international handbooks of education","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Academic integrity; Engineering ethics; Argument (complex analysis); Information ethics; Research integrity; Applied ethics; Foundation (evidence); Sociology; Political science; Engineering; Medicine; Law","score_opus":0.06748678771292026,"score_gpt":0.4180430176101567,"score_spread":0.35055622989723645,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391974110","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.003433451,0.01639075,0.08888724,0.09848349,0.0029383213,0.000274467,0.00007575787,0.00022500151,0.7892914],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5155415,0.0130011905,0.09943737,0.040998742,0.0048709433,0.001923636,0.00014237364,0.0004511933,0.32363307],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98061895,0.012388365,0.0009232452,0.0009803107,0.003945844,0.0011432697],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9791627,0.013470704,0.0012226215,0.0019909292,0.0029633427,0.0011898192],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018496424,0.000779082,0.00071763573,0.0021790368,0.007450657,0.020472597,0.0023863304,0.011130297,0.0069390424],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024704441,0.00051720714,0.00060797104,0.0025549377,0.05387302,0.013437374,0.010544468,0.014678572,0.0021637431],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000011157462,0.000005260968,0.00002359206,0.000023697658,6.6363106e-7,0.00001635242,0.0022777922,0.000051578223,0.000016549708,0.9826606,0.009402675,0.005520048],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000038522,0.00001126429,0.00007840637,0.00034014694,0.000002172103,0.00013838802,0.0024522645,0.00020898916,0.000119494,0.7992133,0.1974179,0.000013863879],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003974423,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0057763783,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9888697,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0066776113,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.022381255,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09781963},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391974132","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-54144-5_159","title":"Designing International Research to Promote Academic Integrity: From Funding to Educating","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Springer international handbooks of education","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec en Outaouais","funders":"","keywords":"General partnership; Academic integrity; Dream; Political science; Public relations; Research integrity; Engineering ethics; Pedagogy; Management; Sociology; Engineering; Psychology; Law","score_opus":0.14813793758103244,"score_gpt":0.44674008087822914,"score_spread":0.2986021432971967,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391974132","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0049103787,0.02081098,0.06917705,0.09254893,0.0032523184,0.00023661861,0.00006964825,0.0005304716,0.80846363],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2592208,0.049313746,0.10803772,0.0195766,0.0030779669,0.0012178088,0.00023538878,0.0015537853,0.5577661],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98051673,0.013581192,0.00060887897,0.00072461285,0.0037630368,0.0008055051],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94271904,0.043280568,0.0023310976,0.004273573,0.004372336,0.0030234226],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.028246138,0.00059710024,0.0006253863,0.002029738,0.003896125,0.019696752,0.0016173936,0.003829648,0.018481761],"category_scores_gemma":[0.048076212,0.00070962444,0.00039628704,0.0025787286,0.01262259,0.016294252,0.0057164757,0.006773693,0.006966929],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001135935,0.000052169555,0.00034228692,0.00026400565,0.000006088473,0.00004239814,0.011646527,0.0002517742,0.00031425862,0.7670002,0.08095826,0.13911064],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000095567075,0.000030447101,0.00027413448,0.0009148996,0.000009999766,0.000084987565,0.005603223,0.00021818296,0.0007434595,0.380564,0.6115305,0.00001667422],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001175303,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002433471,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99617034,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0049174447,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016549412,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14938164},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391974133","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-54144-5_122","title":"Academic Integrity Policies in Hispanic South American Higher Education: Status and Recommendations","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Springer international handbooks of education","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Academic integrity; Political science; Misconduct; Higher education; Public relations; Engineering ethics; Public administration; Engineering; Law","score_opus":0.04227342620248207,"score_gpt":0.36673790855220983,"score_spread":0.32446448234972775,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391974133","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03518316,0.027088195,0.00038934915,0.8343864,0.002370784,0.00007444719,0.00050201465,0.000077503544,0.09992818],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.58689326,0.080480486,0.0033685088,0.20678362,0.005015188,0.0005281162,0.0014840894,0.00017644808,0.11527032],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9903564,0.0030447613,0.0007041989,0.00059902814,0.0030509438,0.002244696],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.91827065,0.036998097,0.0073128357,0.0019408831,0.021124834,0.014352768],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.024205932,0.0003312123,0.00047451086,0.004445346,0.009985112,0.01619851,0.005314758,0.009336243,0.022758508],"category_scores_gemma":[0.057866465,0.00051671534,0.0006634305,0.008678516,0.0074344752,0.013130228,0.006097383,0.010818418,0.0022877532],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013074273,0.00088526524,0.048999768,0.0013950133,0.00003987941,0.0003132517,0.02048014,0.00044438345,0.00026812957,0.18325742,0.51632273,0.22746333],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016080467,0.00021075801,0.13535699,0.012891658,0.00020623895,0.0003237334,0.2133409,0.000821744,0.0014189015,0.07289562,0.5622013,0.00017140455],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.18183665,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.24911581,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99066377,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013484257,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08280665,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36155653},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391974147","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-54144-5_192","title":"Academic Integrity in Nepal","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Springer international handbooks of education","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Academic integrity; Research integrity; Computer science; Political science; Library science; Public relations","score_opus":0.041758603798827884,"score_gpt":0.3592390635236814,"score_spread":0.3174804597248535,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391974147","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009442869,0.048350893,0.0003616122,0.01244767,0.0006462109,0.000038232727,0.000048765676,0.000040107545,0.9286237],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.21629025,0.040762432,0.0006092852,0.005331776,0.0006357301,0.00009107347,0.00009116254,0.000059504568,0.73612875],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99931,0.00022705166,0.000041358486,0.00006452669,0.00020430547,0.00015272106],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991949,0.00034222487,0.00006992261,0.00008709714,0.00018762187,0.000118232805],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009525411,0.00034650657,0.00038425912,0.0012706836,0.0069626155,0.010364243,0.0006654569,0.002480589,0.014490235],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021228439,0.00030404984,0.00015465877,0.0028713073,0.004496209,0.0045902412,0.0036418096,0.003935555,0.003597911],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000397173,0.00013166599,0.0011428539,0.0006580792,0.000008446532,0.0008643402,0.041412886,0.00020926751,0.0004857365,0.5845693,0.11467182,0.25580606],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004238696,0.000026333762,0.0017047095,0.00068053737,0.000005131993,0.0003868969,0.0057530627,0.00006212955,0.00026351007,0.025543218,0.9655568,0.000013400728],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01191661,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.026239034,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99751943,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005137217,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008658356,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04847473},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391974193","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-54144-5_90","title":"Academic Integrity and the Affordances and Limitations of Authentic Assessment","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Springer international handbooks of education","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Medicine Hat College","funders":"","keywords":"Cheating; Academic integrity; Academic dishonesty; Outsourcing; Authentic assessment; Psychology; Affordance; Pedagogy; Medical education; Public relations; Engineering ethics; Social psychology; Business; Political science; Engineering; Marketing; Medicine; Curriculum","score_opus":0.05878250523362673,"score_gpt":0.3602729115495422,"score_spread":0.3014904063159155,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391974193","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0066630994,0.048286896,0.03912146,0.06187443,0.0013735731,0.000057693433,0.00005469201,0.00019672522,0.84237146],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.71259445,0.035440374,0.020255214,0.0073867165,0.0027476,0.00024069357,0.00006458563,0.00036763214,0.22090273],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.977459,0.014476323,0.0007429271,0.00089789485,0.0056904913,0.0007334015],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93408084,0.051292624,0.0024732354,0.006051625,0.0047040656,0.0013976692],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018398939,0.0005294681,0.0008110212,0.0027691005,0.004575684,0.023938091,0.0018151824,0.0047457223,0.012382],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05961856,0.000510757,0.0003775839,0.0028662605,0.049328085,0.026363246,0.009688802,0.01033971,0.0027845055],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005815701,0.000008117399,0.000102601065,0.000053455664,0.0000016555442,0.000024195995,0.0039070346,0.00012227503,0.00002492362,0.96578395,0.005548691,0.024417251],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000037663738,0.000014147959,0.00018873466,0.0003779091,0.0000033698707,0.00014884917,0.0023268277,0.00030773808,0.00017509722,0.86703485,0.12940463,0.000014127278],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002430366,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0034708555,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9952543,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0040779617,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007996187,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.097304046},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391982260","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-54144-5_137","title":"Aligning Theoretical and Practical Considerations for Academic Integrity Education: A Canadian Perspective","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Springer international handbooks of education","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); Academic integrity; Engineering ethics; Political science; Sociology; Engineering; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.048157029561471484,"score_gpt":0.3934168715668494,"score_spread":0.3452598420053779,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391982260","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0025568106,0.019925268,0.00601958,0.5592183,0.002821805,0.000078506644,0.000112037764,0.00013353194,0.40913406],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.37333137,0.08664401,0.039781213,0.10832594,0.003007142,0.0002672337,0.0003226046,0.00055656116,0.38776392],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9757572,0.005392184,0.0008462193,0.0014225907,0.011418804,0.005162924],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95885116,0.010856448,0.0011599829,0.0012154899,0.020207535,0.007709391],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.027743975,0.0013177195,0.0012845106,0.009775836,0.038410958,0.040786073,0.006338098,0.018904606,0.020260492],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03533969,0.0011017832,0.00093780545,0.012278738,0.051359866,0.01566726,0.008187956,0.023507394,0.0026173599],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007772132,0.0000250515,0.00020764928,0.00012616685,0.000002934007,0.00009989838,0.004944371,0.0003570811,0.00009433101,0.87821686,0.089263596,0.026654238],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014374361,0.000019596057,0.0009567485,0.0013803344,0.000018961948,0.00019620809,0.023096384,0.0007346994,0.00028817158,0.20245981,0.7707244,0.00011032536],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96396226,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9863592,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9810954,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.22591731,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.50346714,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8978262},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392236213","doi":"10.1007/s10805-024-09515-w","title":"Academic Integrity Policy Analysis of Chilean Universities","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Academic Ethics","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"Agencia Nacional de Investigación y Desarrollo","keywords":"Academic integrity; Cheating; Context (archaeology); Academic dishonesty; Misconduct; Public relations; Enforcement; Political science; Higher education; Accreditation; Scarcity; Sociology; Engineering ethics; Psychology; Engineering; Law","score_opus":0.07720241088372569,"score_gpt":0.43088336903096636,"score_spread":0.35368095814724065,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392236213","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.79884064,0.0016496148,0.0007495582,0.05072696,0.000057462315,0.00016871889,0.0006242971,0.000021215872,0.14716153],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9871198,0.00039079782,0.00016724123,0.0013646369,0.000042475975,0.000072723604,0.00012717693,0.0000085975635,0.010706502],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98958313,0.0040264316,0.00038722611,0.0004400815,0.0020793509,0.0034838852],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95920134,0.024016391,0.0047835247,0.0012664505,0.0068088872,0.0039233463],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012668706,0.00019253015,0.00051575585,0.0036380826,0.0053450097,0.010660273,0.0014721075,0.0026805815,0.013322766],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03872992,0.00032832092,0.00045828428,0.005651116,0.0050189183,0.0035575088,0.0054202843,0.0033707765,0.0004919523],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006531235,0.00052510685,0.14465035,0.00056387554,0.00021418188,0.0012488093,0.027353765,0.0045502023,0.0010016322,0.76346344,0.020847056,0.034928422],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026630974,0.00036691246,0.5183282,0.0016257692,0.0002897165,0.00036349232,0.16184849,0.009452294,0.0026827597,0.10719712,0.19738537,0.00019361553],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.122157626,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11843143,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9973194,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04464853,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.056663767,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32394928},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392370500","doi":"10.1007/s10551-024-05628-9","title":"Academic Fraud and Remote Evaluation of Accounting Students: An Application of the Fraud Triangle","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Business Ethics","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University; University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Cheating; Rationalization (economics); Accounting; Academic integrity; Psychology; Honor; Perception; Code of conduct; Public relations; Business; Social psychology; Internet privacy; Political science; Computer science; Economics; Management","score_opus":0.12411736188454953,"score_gpt":0.43777534654177214,"score_spread":0.3136579846572226,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392370500","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9821938,0.00025455884,0.003657478,0.003148349,0.00003245226,0.00008881474,0.000026313945,0.000017459528,0.010580807],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985998,0.00005839374,0.0008695321,0.00017321504,0.00001811913,0.000033161985,0.0000071969826,0.000004250843,0.00023634404],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.93240404,0.050943404,0.0015588573,0.0020004367,0.011286323,0.001806977],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.5532856,0.32291797,0.08201739,0.01387634,0.020016786,0.00788592],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.035618007,0.00043521138,0.0007190062,0.003351438,0.0033701726,0.006132387,0.0014371825,0.0019960469,0.007019828],"category_scores_gemma":[0.211745,0.00036357847,0.00081196614,0.0026637716,0.0064459797,0.0056318217,0.008539485,0.0044323383,0.0005008204],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00056882657,0.0026501927,0.8669758,0.00019075348,0.00017431074,0.00046296674,0.030814832,0.0011738628,0.00051668443,0.01120666,0.0015330622,0.08373208],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000101212994,0.0020978441,0.86777073,0.0006134416,0.00020051567,0.00071968534,0.07170666,0.027315315,0.0020708393,0.021843199,0.005363484,0.00019707384],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038290934,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003786639,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99800396,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003971919,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030093188,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18836826},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392438336","doi":"10.1016/j.jecp.2024.105888","title":"Academic cheating in early childhood: Role of age, gender, personality, and self-efficacy","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Child Psychology","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ontario Institute for Cancer Research; Institute for Christian Studies; University of British Columbia","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Cheating; Psychology; Big Five personality traits; Personality; Developmental psychology; Self-efficacy; Socialization; Social psychology","score_opus":0.03175101105499599,"score_gpt":0.38283757939923424,"score_spread":0.35108656834423824,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392438336","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99941146,0.00013688696,0.000032244272,0.000020140653,0.000002510687,0.0000038384087,0.000033846954,0.0000016184201,0.00035747007],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99964225,0.00008144529,0.00006632977,0.0000062790327,0.0000017485149,0.0000046214427,0.000043673044,8.7127404e-7,0.00015275987],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99943906,0.00015968687,0.000050320356,0.00007047815,0.0001337045,0.00014676069],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99402374,0.0012860222,0.0028673343,0.0004013559,0.0004402491,0.0009812354],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015298919,0.00037669137,0.00037185146,0.00069417316,0.0004958932,0.00094522495,0.00032745814,0.00040669017,0.0011505126],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0053709405,0.00026397823,0.0005390684,0.0005504883,0.00047280843,0.00041872202,0.0005908065,0.00082181726,0.0001701243],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005377773,0.000087969296,0.99686664,0.00000822647,0.000018120592,0.00007439361,0.0006326662,0.000020804227,0.0001732399,0.00003790486,0.000034909208,0.001991277],"study_design_scores_gemma":[4.0197537e-7,0.000032765034,0.9995579,0.000005558537,0.0000048353036,0.00003839109,0.00024234012,0.000030747302,0.000032254597,0.000010724021,0.00004278006,0.0000012115116],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005454979,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011468408,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005454979,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00041650896,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00054003805,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.010846496},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392557674","doi":"10.1002/leap.1600","title":"Using automated analysis of the bibliography to detect potential research integrity issues","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Learned Publishing","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Honeywell (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Workflow; Computer science; Data science; Key (lock); Research integrity; Bibliography; Data integrity; Information retrieval; Database; Library science; Computer security; Engineering ethics","score_opus":0.14494348183679898,"score_gpt":0.4536236169249125,"score_spread":0.30868013508811354,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392557674","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20838602,0.019515716,0.48410437,0.013588671,0.0034297,0.0036363942,0.06694717,0.05434509,0.14604689],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.40204692,0.0080080135,0.48164988,0.0011096301,0.0017220995,0.001998705,0.06371169,0.0033188115,0.036434308],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9737216,0.0054588537,0.0048043095,0.003491085,0.011793486,0.0007306073],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.73431027,0.09067935,0.046645246,0.03177722,0.09360633,0.0029815908],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.023410317,0.0012282991,0.0012465549,0.063907616,0.0032413108,0.013592133,0.0023131093,0.0015566049,0.015313198],"category_scores_gemma":[0.15089759,0.00068154617,0.0009770688,0.029836072,0.0013462648,0.007864576,0.0044710045,0.0012571202,0.013908761],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006741401,0.00017877523,0.059804358,0.004029753,0.00034035402,0.0019458676,0.006156046,0.0022245552,0.013962487,0.022086851,0.07705822,0.8115387],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021641779,0.0004874172,0.1277269,0.0041738763,0.0010594759,0.0035263528,0.010417489,0.05342395,0.067910954,0.075089395,0.6552705,0.0006971981],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0066031707,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0061336574,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9984434,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022931371,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0076619145,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12380707},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity","bibliometrics"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"simulation_or_modeling","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"domain":"methods","study_design":"observational","genre":"methods","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W4392728089","doi":"10.1016/j.jecp.2024.105893","title":"Elementary school-aged children’s perceptions of academic dishonesty: Definitions and moral evaluations of cheating behaviors in school","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Child Psychology","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Cheating; Vignette; Psychology; Academic dishonesty; Dishonesty; Developmental psychology; Social psychology; Moral behavior; Deception; Sample (material); Clinical psychology; Moral disengagement","score_opus":0.04688578302703619,"score_gpt":0.4189520096307925,"score_spread":0.3720662266037563,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392728089","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9986486,0.000045377546,0.000028906592,0.000045197965,0.0000025789607,0.000006409731,0.000020368569,0.0000015591401,0.0012009374],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99966276,0.000043964832,0.000043358286,0.000015617961,0.0000024444842,0.000007601547,0.000034688714,0.0000015645802,0.00018797017],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971867,0.0007605754,0.00037086013,0.00023696292,0.0009635016,0.00048134296],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9631967,0.0071540643,0.020491725,0.0014400332,0.0042488277,0.003468632],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0047962093,0.00042252216,0.00040973522,0.0022818954,0.0012631846,0.0030156404,0.00071546016,0.0011327384,0.0016154196],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02557893,0.0005270904,0.0007146815,0.0011850726,0.0033611804,0.0019508445,0.0024850694,0.0032071976,0.00028837266],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012581774,0.0003244144,0.9722286,0.00002843786,0.000038494774,0.00011072911,0.023204857,0.000067995454,0.000635594,0.00037670071,0.00012283756,0.0027354085],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004781876,0.000076383665,0.98249257,0.00001582289,0.000013640262,0.00008239777,0.016694894,0.000092088594,0.00020420716,0.00011349322,0.00019880156,0.000011034344],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015166319,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024166398,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9988673,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019781243,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011173722,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030156076},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392862449","doi":"10.32920/25417372.v1","title":"Mad and Disabled Realities Within Academic Integrity at the University Level of Education","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Academic integrity; Ableism; Thematic analysis; Psychology; Higher education; Intellectual disability; Special education; Learning disability; Medical education; Disability studies; Pedagogy; Sociology; Qualitative research; Medicine; Social psychology; Political science; Social science; Developmental psychology; Gender studies","score_opus":0.11043984796898688,"score_gpt":0.3540274098357988,"score_spread":0.2435875618668119,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392862449","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9661122,0.0008797897,0.00087188144,0.0068008155,0.000079695004,0.000032695414,0.000025401125,0.000019060228,0.02517843],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977048,0.00017979178,0.00013050898,0.00030894732,0.000020106374,0.000010984976,0.000005066399,0.000004670734,0.0016351356],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9726299,0.018332213,0.0008500195,0.001035634,0.004112396,0.0030398217],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96388185,0.01527964,0.010357769,0.0024420803,0.002346355,0.0056922575],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011068981,0.0003682623,0.0007112588,0.002702686,0.019655665,0.015116119,0.0013037763,0.0019671659,0.0051144375],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029667942,0.00038432635,0.00039565042,0.002542268,0.03060435,0.0067372313,0.014485774,0.006135062,0.00051468477],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003553069,0.000062249805,0.014162877,0.00007158891,0.000008853865,0.0004007772,0.967985,0.000033741664,0.0004065072,0.00938894,0.00056441326,0.006879664],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000032271034,0.0000670713,0.0114327865,0.00010888303,0.000006879768,0.00043181606,0.9720651,0.00004188485,0.0003342938,0.0016760525,0.013807241,0.000024828807],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007042196,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010072142,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9980328,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008093593,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0076665096,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05872345},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392862566","doi":"10.32920/25417372","title":"Mad and Disabled Realities Within Academic Integrity at the University Level of Education","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"","keywords":"Academic integrity; Ableism; Thematic analysis; Psychology; Medical education; Learning disability; Higher education; Intellectual disability; Special education; Pedagogy; Qualitative research; Sociology; Medicine; Social psychology; Political science; Developmental psychology; Social science; Gender studies","score_opus":0.11043984796898688,"score_gpt":0.3540274098357988,"score_spread":0.2435875618668119,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392862566","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9661122,0.0008797897,0.00087188144,0.0068008155,0.000079695004,0.000032695414,0.000025401125,0.000019060228,0.02517843],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977048,0.00017979178,0.00013050898,0.00030894732,0.000020106374,0.000010984976,0.000005066399,0.000004670734,0.0016351356],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9726299,0.018332213,0.0008500195,0.001035634,0.004112396,0.0030398217],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96388185,0.01527964,0.010357769,0.0024420803,0.002346355,0.0056922575],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011068981,0.0003682623,0.0007112588,0.002702686,0.019655665,0.015116119,0.0013037763,0.0019671659,0.0051144375],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029667942,0.00038432635,0.00039565042,0.002542268,0.03060435,0.0067372313,0.014485774,0.006135062,0.00051468477],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003553069,0.000062249805,0.014162877,0.00007158891,0.000008853865,0.0004007772,0.967985,0.000033741664,0.0004065072,0.00938894,0.00056441326,0.006879664],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000032271034,0.0000670713,0.0114327865,0.00010888303,0.000006879768,0.00043181606,0.9720651,0.00004188485,0.0003342938,0.0016760525,0.013807241,0.000024828807],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007042196,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010072142,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9980328,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008093593,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0076665096,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05872345},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4394127797","doi":"10.6084/m9.figshare.20424148","title":"What difference might retractions make? An estimate of the potential epistemic cost of retractions on meta-analyses","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"dataset","venue":"London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science)","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ottawa Hospital; Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Computer science; Epistemology; Econometrics; Mathematics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.16090707776705274,"score_gpt":0.4570953562483701,"score_spread":0.29618827848131735,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4394127797","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"dataset","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"dataset","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.26071304,0.13823158,0.20302638,0.08991418,0.007831112,0.008481311,0.2523089,0.0039913324,0.03550219],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.78780556,0.015909038,0.12117622,0.010617715,0.0029262428,0.011314287,0.04555555,0.00094904174,0.0037464232],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.5538042,0.33137244,0.065050945,0.016889235,0.03006477,0.0028183132],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.0694146,0.85552883,0.034390274,0.03176181,0.008356363,0.00054815976],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.36862957,0.0017938671,0.0046797656,0.011609207,0.0016549715,0.008308,0.0045606145,0.004759896,0.010234106],"category_scores_gemma":[0.8309365,0.0017768947,0.01601854,0.021283513,0.0034778987,0.009528083,0.006169249,0.006790164,0.0017984152],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0110537335,0.0002496789,0.26969332,0.08091652,0.08611407,0.0015072168,0.0047654146,0.032512378,0.0011044258,0.06976843,0.12104296,0.3212719],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0096633155,0.0014156188,0.2618143,0.04800087,0.11381652,0.006414441,0.0022433465,0.04760269,0.0060722255,0.26992208,0.23185022,0.0011843718],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0040966924,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006075411,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9952401,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0042612664,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0039281165,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.77859217},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"simulation_or_modeling","genre":"dataset","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"domain":"methods","study_design":"simulation_or_modeling","genre":"dataset","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W4394690527","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0300710","title":"How do authors’ perceptions of their papers compare with co-authors’ perceptions and peer-review decisions?","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PLoS ONE","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Google (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Ranking (information retrieval); Perception; Peer review; Psychology; Salient; Computer science; Political science; Information retrieval","score_opus":0.09848444079796288,"score_gpt":0.33861818431015134,"score_spread":0.24013374351218847,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4394690527","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9812682,0.0019920561,0.0039848248,0.0035951035,0.00028323615,0.00008720174,0.0002446235,0.00005554103,0.008489378],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99699664,0.0005025009,0.0012141514,0.00038386334,0.00023857607,0.000047189817,0.00013613506,0.000022066712,0.0004590577],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9159431,0.04168051,0.010169484,0.00482144,0.02551979,0.0018657233],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.5402623,0.25446814,0.10796226,0.013767942,0.06688967,0.016649725],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.060262587,0.0004097235,0.0009939347,0.0058389753,0.0014588174,0.010349191,0.0010261959,0.0017648309,0.0018499495],"category_scores_gemma":[0.31096974,0.000459473,0.0014450138,0.0034986706,0.002639208,0.0057132975,0.0029938377,0.0017165494,0.00092215784],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00085520936,0.0002490829,0.85509336,0.0007619255,0.0015697894,0.00061012956,0.057811815,0.0010814356,0.0024983622,0.0013705652,0.0028478464,0.075250395],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019798148,0.0014420282,0.8856967,0.00045408026,0.0005720742,0.0017595718,0.082552105,0.0042888345,0.0028900492,0.007010641,0.012508979,0.0006269443],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001486732,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001387271,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93973744,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014497036,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001514167,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31870288},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4394948457","doi":"10.55016/ojs/cpai.v7i3.78123","title":"Academic Integrity and Artificial Intelligence in Higher Education (HE) Contexts: A Rapid Scoping Review","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Perspectives on Academic Integrity","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Academic integrity; Psychology; Engineering ethics; Data science; Computer science; Engineering; Social psychology","score_opus":0.0780755929972215,"score_gpt":0.39327927606536023,"score_spread":0.31520368306813873,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4394948457","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0008753853,0.93211716,0.00406844,0.05008136,0.003494539,0.0025617322,0.0006630752,0.000060907085,0.0060774973],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.011322392,0.95763713,0.01538756,0.008598397,0.0010355343,0.0044454075,0.0005365953,0.000053283442,0.0009838379],"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","domain_scores_codex":[0.837657,0.07240524,0.04728983,0.0044722967,0.035206888,0.0029687064],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.44445458,0.37648976,0.035416257,0.015054034,0.12396021,0.0046252375],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.19748855,0.0018139663,0.0053623854,0.04890251,0.0059367795,0.017517319,0.0047854055,0.009115605,0.0052873846],"category_scores_gemma":[0.4357675,0.002416206,0.00546976,0.048800528,0.007957398,0.021083867,0.011632873,0.0076832185,0.0014262077],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":"systematic_review","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013470984,0.00004445052,0.0016203197,0.4479668,0.0013058817,0.00056038745,0.015695805,0.0004850382,0.0005716622,0.029957892,0.078080185,0.42357683],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028130706,0.00004463619,0.0011347788,0.76731646,0.0012382423,0.00021015435,0.0034376385,0.00013969638,0.00015519533,0.0061570723,0.22006258,0.00007546677],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.063558266,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14461577,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9908844,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.032797605,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.16247872,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9896395},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4395047582","doi":"10.1007/s10805-024-09529-4","title":"Framing Integrity Resolution: An Integrative Approach to Academic Ethics","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Academic Ethics","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Framing (construction); Academic integrity; Research integrity; Engineering ethics; Political science; Engineering","score_opus":0.16421460897335344,"score_gpt":0.4563299925771124,"score_spread":0.29211538360375894,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4395047582","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018612945,0.003965516,0.5282268,0.1319106,0.0015827627,0.0003746415,0.00006816563,0.0002848636,0.3149737],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.78810763,0.0021804373,0.18289499,0.007827933,0.0015449339,0.0007244924,0.00008881802,0.0002596793,0.016371079],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9437707,0.0447064,0.001497793,0.0019368146,0.006063971,0.002024283],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.92684245,0.05487294,0.003174114,0.0054532825,0.0070217736,0.0026355167],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.055057086,0.0015457835,0.0016078361,0.008508253,0.015138731,0.028459625,0.005367472,0.012696465,0.008994732],"category_scores_gemma":[0.059054654,0.0011310424,0.0016053093,0.0045355265,0.06774039,0.030575585,0.017977528,0.013994878,0.0010823781],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000067275987,0.000023302648,0.0001310331,0.000051306884,0.000008615339,0.00004589305,0.0114964945,0.00027613196,0.00006839956,0.97878027,0.0015907887,0.0075210463],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001092066,0.000013448356,0.00012520533,0.0002805008,0.000021487052,0.00005427876,0.008537163,0.0013831867,0.00021683838,0.96654004,0.022797309,0.000019568493],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0046104956,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0055089477,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98730356,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011815376,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020668687,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29117322},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4395060414","doi":"10.1016/j.jecp.2024.105933","title":"Young children with higher verbal intelligence are less likely to cheat","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Child Psychology","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Ministry of Education of the People's Republic of China; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Cheating; Psychology; Developmental psychology; Intelligence quotient; Cognition; Logistic regression; Nonverbal communication; Social psychology","score_opus":0.033313715420272345,"score_gpt":0.37622061725579714,"score_spread":0.3429069018355248,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4395060414","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99822885,0.0001615069,0.000039355582,0.00011124761,0.000008895503,0.000004759018,0.00011604594,0.000007991463,0.0013213495],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983903,0.00017635149,0.00009460865,0.00005919786,0.000008628682,0.0000069752027,0.00020810758,0.0000076682745,0.0010483575],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99950206,0.00008741254,0.00005648268,0.000060177357,0.00017795783,0.00011583339],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9849,0.002822489,0.010244889,0.0003633393,0.0005886981,0.0010806115],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00048924395,0.00023179357,0.00031365833,0.0012361447,0.00053643435,0.0012527263,0.00032236057,0.00076391257,0.0061392705],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011865732,0.00021679443,0.00038866312,0.0008015641,0.00057964626,0.0006855204,0.00045479363,0.0011295365,0.0010703029],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000045402936,0.00006365396,0.9955444,0.000014531952,0.000017730144,0.00024019527,0.000516288,0.000019552568,0.0002937326,0.000051575847,0.00019501196,0.0029980459],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000035410935,0.000070131675,0.99749124,0.000016183043,0.000017294695,0.0007564736,0.0010096458,0.000043171163,0.0001736756,0.000087121276,0.00032646296,0.0000050870703],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0049376055,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005630858,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9992361,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030645073,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00046574866,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.020537913},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396509129","doi":"10.22215/etd/2024-15861","title":"Instructor Perceptions of e-Proctoring Software","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Academic integrity; Perception; Perspective (graphical); Medical education; Cheating; Psychology; Class (philosophy); Computer science; Medicine; Social psychology","score_opus":0.017451757272800437,"score_gpt":0.3355352685437833,"score_spread":0.31808351127098283,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396509129","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9894056,0.00016433079,0.0011502291,0.0011584306,0.000026164455,0.000021832655,0.000019423589,0.000029944502,0.008024065],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977024,0.00017477135,0.0004008431,0.0002271937,0.000016749233,0.000015983067,0.000012931601,0.0000078276,0.0014413036],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9918864,0.004870892,0.00039073153,0.0003585496,0.002051943,0.00044143441],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9468689,0.03009642,0.009240728,0.0015172837,0.0073273648,0.0049492866],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0064110947,0.00014932123,0.0001796218,0.0005505765,0.0013566434,0.0030542545,0.0004800043,0.0007117904,0.0047736363],"category_scores_gemma":[0.043099254,0.00014152723,0.00014977441,0.00041393848,0.0012885899,0.0014640403,0.0015607576,0.0010744721,0.00053765165],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023307261,0.0011883931,0.4356794,0.0004572597,0.000036723442,0.0009388411,0.42108145,0.00037056906,0.006543266,0.0032083876,0.0041292426,0.12613337],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007737781,0.002189301,0.3425446,0.00074577023,0.00008708396,0.0012663376,0.5654403,0.0029553506,0.005162628,0.0015843674,0.07783452,0.000112444126],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016315582,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016852571,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9992882,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009464826,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019090454,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.033905506},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396921240","doi":"10.1016/j.jecp.2024.105948","title":"Cheating in childhood: Exploring the link between parental reports of problem behaviors and dishonesty on simulated academic tests","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Child Psychology","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; University of Toronto; University of New Brunswick","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Cheating; Psychology; Child Behavior Checklist; Academic dishonesty; Developmental psychology; Religiosity; Checklist; Test (biology); Social psychology; Association (psychology); Multilevel model; Dishonesty; Clinical psychology","score_opus":0.049831905746043244,"score_gpt":0.3995799127756726,"score_spread":0.3497480070296294,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396921240","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9995968,0.00005326892,0.00007776221,0.000016469932,0.0000013832872,0.0000038847634,0.000054299617,0.0000029298158,0.00019331319],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999546,0.00007746812,0.00016481735,0.000006873634,0.0000020534574,0.000008176144,0.00010421194,0.0000015566661,0.00008874913],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989213,0.00045463478,0.000109798886,0.00012546855,0.00024051245,0.00014836632],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98499006,0.0057599256,0.0064315065,0.0009085171,0.00092074863,0.0009892063],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016008432,0.00038879577,0.00038294995,0.000991675,0.0003676749,0.00084074034,0.00035942195,0.0004266109,0.0010049839],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015321627,0.00038787338,0.00042050527,0.0006628721,0.00054036017,0.0005678499,0.0007185045,0.0010541923,0.00012147643],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002658719,0.000063004445,0.99774796,0.0000068736867,0.000021450478,0.000050391587,0.0005099271,0.00003221517,0.00010163918,0.000014311969,0.00001955858,0.0014062362],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000011928563,0.000118510616,0.9988042,0.0000059759245,0.000013614957,0.00014638534,0.0005734757,0.00015676409,0.00010767714,0.000014100224,0.00005401268,0.000003994492],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007872892,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011950502,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007872892,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00047714697,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00045636352,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.015654087},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396983477","doi":"10.69520/jipe.v4i2.134","title":"Preserving and Promoting Academic Integrity in a Changing Post-secondary Landscape","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of innovation in polytechnic education.","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Humber Polytechnic","funders":"","keywords":"Academic integrity; Structural integrity; Geography; Environmental resource management; Political science; Environmental planning; Engineering ethics; Environmental science; Engineering","score_opus":0.021614176747079945,"score_gpt":0.3324509557962193,"score_spread":0.31083677904913937,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396983477","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.67312807,0.0011091249,0.004295535,0.17676763,0.00052542955,0.00011695876,0.00004627329,0.00012286632,0.14388822],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9890364,0.0002063429,0.00053545396,0.0031232918,0.000072531875,0.000017153876,0.000009679211,0.000023548575,0.006975603],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98297095,0.008146927,0.00033656092,0.0007587415,0.002197718,0.0055891396],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9658549,0.005411342,0.0032919266,0.0020677063,0.007077945,0.016296212],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014880115,0.00025435397,0.00056188536,0.002100007,0.07705607,0.031694207,0.0028736824,0.0047914186,0.007679591],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021961233,0.00036088942,0.00039058639,0.0021141476,0.036061235,0.008643099,0.01996693,0.009003825,0.0014074087],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008980288,0.00033349817,0.03203693,0.00017263961,0.000021980191,0.002410101,0.7250688,0.00023738357,0.0017413974,0.13972308,0.029055139,0.06910935],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012667897,0.00013825252,0.024863524,0.00022105208,0.000008820513,0.00047736868,0.73258066,0.00022196212,0.0011433713,0.03108701,0.20918989,0.000055459896],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.039748453,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0980893,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99520856,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.024741039,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.050464567,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17950964},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399297930","doi":"10.5430/wjel.v14n4p620","title":"Perceptions of Digital Academic Dishonesty in English Writing at Applied Colleges","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Journal of English Language","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Academic dishonesty; Academic integrity; Vocabulary; Psychology; Grammar; Academic writing; Syntax; Perception; Mathematics education; Descriptive statistics; Medical education; Cheating; Pedagogy; Computer science; Social psychology; Medicine; Linguistics","score_opus":0.01095319668295277,"score_gpt":0.2897395065719587,"score_spread":0.27878630988900593,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399297930","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9984498,0.00013083483,0.00006940499,0.00023728411,0.0000049005653,0.000004706109,0.0000071422796,0.0000023563882,0.0010936132],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99933463,0.00016380793,0.00004438831,0.00010095687,0.0000046725236,0.0000022424867,0.0000054713146,0.0000014554199,0.0003422469],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99706596,0.00089967705,0.00029784717,0.00017314157,0.0011452,0.00041819405],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98043513,0.004985301,0.0086469585,0.0006320539,0.0019235925,0.0033770213],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002819344,0.0003021326,0.00030965902,0.0011155795,0.0024463406,0.004095135,0.00044307992,0.00074726384,0.0036303424],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012216824,0.00024096959,0.00023263934,0.0008165517,0.002532011,0.001927006,0.0026451312,0.0014299804,0.00041671528],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011511335,0.00028506812,0.5639488,0.00026239597,0.000030147736,0.0017756928,0.40096933,0.00009652484,0.004557285,0.00078232744,0.0006411072,0.026536228],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006983682,0.00030287125,0.2775696,0.0002137191,0.00002393263,0.0014413478,0.71287936,0.0002604028,0.00092852255,0.00037668788,0.0059484616,0.00004812857],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004222732,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0057983138,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99925274,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010152269,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015431856,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.014910281},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399710116","doi":"10.1016/j.jclinepi.2024.111427","title":"Identification of retracted publications and completeness of retraction notices in public health","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Clinical Epidemiology","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Library and Archives Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Completeness (order theory); Identification (biology); Public health; Medicine; Computer science; Mathematics; Biology; Pathology","score_opus":0.46925259758110227,"score_gpt":0.5655348517299681,"score_spread":0.09628225414886582,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399710116","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.59760743,0.08488264,0.07620331,0.10448678,0.0122845415,0.02169007,0.019803157,0.0021369203,0.08090512],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.81724995,0.034493484,0.10174889,0.007978597,0.0046002385,0.014193176,0.009655221,0.0009243232,0.009156134],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.26917326,0.32739502,0.25212264,0.013194062,0.13321754,0.004897527],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.03403546,0.6183284,0.20326146,0.05483061,0.086460166,0.0030838808],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.52108496,0.0010418235,0.003007644,0.04097494,0.006508273,0.02043891,0.006210759,0.004229878,0.008742446],"category_scores_gemma":[0.8763109,0.0018973561,0.002635958,0.040205196,0.008880416,0.020833623,0.015579244,0.004326549,0.0042128125],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0016674188,0.00041484903,0.3693886,0.046737026,0.0010336533,0.0023343838,0.09892333,0.00086103927,0.0017382255,0.015273739,0.049252935,0.41237488],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005237418,0.0017209155,0.4368245,0.10032284,0.0016041707,0.008291981,0.079357766,0.0036342407,0.0070142704,0.023263535,0.33613306,0.0013090038],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024594748,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021901971,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9957701,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007756219,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.038190044,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5905875},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity","scholarly_communication"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W4399819549","doi":"10.1515/9782760535053-019","title":"Un exemple de coformation réussie du stagiaire","year":2012,"lang":"fr","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Presses de l'Université du Québec eBooks","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Art","score_opus":0.012712752981542084,"score_gpt":0.20115463299878727,"score_spread":0.18844188001724518,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399819549","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.026424436,0.005659589,0.03439418,0.0076835975,0.0009802997,0.00011377635,0.00014814404,0.00100895,0.92358685],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.25677657,0.0017525889,0.009899243,0.0011915585,0.0003973345,0.000097405464,0.00013500344,0.000780271,0.72897005],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9936267,0.0017947275,0.00020859437,0.0005287541,0.00302496,0.0008162743],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99171984,0.002461703,0.0004810541,0.0026661193,0.002349352,0.000322043],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004125596,0.0007729259,0.0005742936,0.004748166,0.012719114,0.011083449,0.0018135812,0.0042026667,0.01303993],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013069371,0.0005306906,0.00063450064,0.0063192947,0.01451097,0.005147107,0.004662639,0.004313256,0.0040786224],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000050583265,0.00002405352,0.0008589713,0.000079679645,0.000012999408,0.0007432589,0.037179522,0.00035057557,0.0010080019,0.84138435,0.043509144,0.07479889],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010545577,0.000018621107,0.0014553383,0.0001420829,0.000010857515,0.0011021537,0.0040338817,0.00061744166,0.00090520637,0.027753534,0.96391964,0.000030697884],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3006379,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.32806838,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3006379,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0146466885,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010426605,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.597776},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399867534","doi":"10.1111/desc.13540","title":"High consistency of cheating and honesty in early childhood","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Developmental Science","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Ministry of Education of the People's Republic of China","keywords":"Cheating; Honesty; Psychology; Consistency (knowledge bases); Intervention (counseling); Academic integrity; Social psychology; Developmental psychology","score_opus":0.01170285751793604,"score_gpt":0.2659432616754365,"score_spread":0.2542404041575005,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399867534","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9984876,0.0003707415,0.00014678172,0.000030026838,0.000005737646,0.000010383027,0.00009294499,0.0000071797353,0.000848499],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991623,0.00019367249,0.00028740338,0.000014798286,0.0000042117313,0.00000819221,0.000092567476,0.0000028077968,0.0002340996],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99722517,0.00044668044,0.0003495333,0.00033852804,0.001175138,0.00046502752],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9838881,0.0028174133,0.009533241,0.00093389506,0.0020258455,0.00080154504],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031182026,0.00040036422,0.0005870904,0.0015849324,0.00070386584,0.0011555876,0.0005120875,0.00065213186,0.0010846199],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011950114,0.00047074206,0.0006163756,0.00088029675,0.00095160544,0.000616819,0.0012195614,0.0008963293,0.00016325644],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006392781,0.000059052272,0.9915821,0.0000596802,0.00006566412,0.00014814569,0.0019193338,0.000034048368,0.0009344367,0.00008800971,0.00008198112,0.004963672],"study_design_scores_gemma":[5.393871e-7,0.000047049678,0.99933785,0.000008676017,0.000010143467,0.00009558544,0.00019691238,0.000015130667,0.00020663574,0.000013365009,0.000065068954,0.0000030731637],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010794233,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018084371,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010794233,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00084386446,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006843056,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021462798},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399914400","doi":"10.33919/esnbu.24.1.1","title":"Academic Integrity Policies in HEIs Across Cultures","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"English Studies at NBU","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"New Bulgarian University; Bulgarian National Science Fund; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Academic integrity; Higher education; Research integrity; Political science; Sociology; Engineering ethics; Public relations; Engineering; Law","score_opus":0.05358266981316663,"score_gpt":0.4225867043056914,"score_spread":0.3690040344925248,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399914400","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.70765364,0.003681152,0.0031071925,0.014220842,0.00017731497,0.000117647076,0.000090876645,0.000025616484,0.2709256],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9952146,0.00049324136,0.00039005114,0.0005141945,0.000010211882,0.00003040218,0.000012258302,0.0000094762045,0.003325519],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9738991,0.013896786,0.0020633147,0.0018123218,0.00461084,0.0037176644],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9511315,0.018815132,0.008377315,0.006628294,0.0092040375,0.005843695],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016253306,0.00019948477,0.0005229361,0.0030805757,0.01402996,0.012514046,0.0010554483,0.0014772268,0.0041605704],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05249717,0.00033432638,0.0002827292,0.004435098,0.022904675,0.0084758205,0.011777504,0.0030571262,0.00036134347],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000068139365,0.00008695134,0.036663104,0.00020414886,0.000044014898,0.0006262446,0.5943245,0.00026009275,0.00038602622,0.31534857,0.0020064581,0.0499817],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016253502,0.00009674365,0.08214477,0.0013508189,0.000035951532,0.00075750914,0.7709283,0.00043061213,0.0010529589,0.054596916,0.08848985,0.00009932805],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08018464,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06581042,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99852276,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016823543,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019581689,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15943581},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400313990","doi":"10.1126/science.adr0734","title":"Preventing bad behavior in academia","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"Science","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick; Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Scientific misconduct; Misconduct; Psychology; Criminology; Political science; Engineering ethics; Law; Medicine; Engineering; Alternative medicine","score_opus":0.033648943098852045,"score_gpt":0.3599365938132523,"score_spread":0.3262876507144003,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400313990","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00077628373,0.00039277412,0.00011264065,0.9892095,0.004572269,0.000014809871,0.000019439845,0.0000364673,0.0048659346],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0039918562,0.00023722538,0.00019071977,0.9814999,0.0033251669,0.00003329428,0.000010406279,0.000018820063,0.010692525],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9902593,0.003159104,0.00086899515,0.0008214263,0.0027861267,0.0021050803],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9618124,0.0134717785,0.001955882,0.0012286266,0.0076852273,0.013846075],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011607124,0.0006161471,0.0008820431,0.0010405693,0.014895851,0.00758119,0.002112787,0.09483934,0.010572704],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04954766,0.000880623,0.0012651911,0.0007667741,0.0052171377,0.0054833554,0.003919112,0.04644622,0.0078640245],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039275845,0.00009839739,0.0019348811,0.00004357693,0.000013503647,0.0013371971,0.00062121724,0.000074016934,0.00041452318,0.0035787967,0.9817779,0.010066663],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013417346,0.00016083718,0.0032594919,0.00031376808,0.000025806105,0.0011589304,0.00253323,0.00052037556,0.0006099288,0.010405105,0.9807808,0.00009757817],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.025505086,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.047828764,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9883929,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006878515,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.025558773,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.061385095},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400456214","doi":"10.18162/fp.2024.808","title":"Usages du téléphone portable chez les étudiants et fraude aux examens en milieu universitaire camerounais","year":2024,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Formation et profession","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Art","score_opus":0.026617995597642514,"score_gpt":0.32281996840479027,"score_spread":0.2962019728071478,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400456214","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9938152,0.00068342185,0.00048291005,0.001787177,0.000032460735,0.00003836511,0.00004823963,0.000007729117,0.0031045482],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9943023,0.00081775757,0.00041896926,0.0002472705,0.000020912923,0.00003618205,0.000024610983,0.000005180949,0.004127016],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9924819,0.0039585866,0.00055192824,0.00052760314,0.0013717324,0.0011082292],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97727114,0.011193322,0.005583025,0.0011068239,0.0028148838,0.0020308383],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00620854,0.00032690231,0.0003851189,0.0025406012,0.005459495,0.003874699,0.00069010665,0.0014874233,0.0081355525],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03135776,0.00035829298,0.00023368979,0.0027048627,0.0025037038,0.0024597347,0.0034472256,0.0018704053,0.00079694024],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020561166,0.00022626022,0.42885262,0.00025490872,0.00002498688,0.0033436257,0.43736783,0.00020370673,0.0038549472,0.0059832158,0.0023424367,0.11733991],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015514202,0.0006851504,0.47922394,0.0006112925,0.00003763563,0.0029507868,0.46241802,0.0007842065,0.0024324825,0.0014164492,0.04931847,0.00010608578],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.027461447,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.029442493,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99851257,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033644936,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035115867,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05460322},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400482628","doi":"10.55016/ojs/cpai.v3i2.71211","title":"Reducing plagiarism and improving writing: A lesson from Chinese painting","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Perspectives on Academic Integrity","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Painting; Art; Psychology; Visual arts","score_opus":0.02857825619423319,"score_gpt":0.300936564859512,"score_spread":0.27235830866527877,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400482628","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.48803994,0.009766437,0.032388087,0.2153842,0.002047574,0.0007484309,0.000099194585,0.0008948725,0.25063133],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87212896,0.008486573,0.04573852,0.009720689,0.00059769547,0.00025029658,0.00007814067,0.00023481122,0.06276445],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985764,0.0006601927,0.000059731407,0.00011278441,0.00041600477,0.00017475904],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968495,0.0016255047,0.00015346521,0.00040344495,0.0006424641,0.00032574427],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030956548,0.00096144143,0.0004411709,0.0008610648,0.0061617168,0.0030709985,0.0015778554,0.0021478566,0.0022351642],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0068152673,0.00025756058,0.00057812285,0.0009773788,0.007760488,0.0046210946,0.0028004462,0.0038943195,0.0004452768],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015269134,0.0006994731,0.0059586163,0.0011493287,0.000070871545,0.0025649182,0.32767838,0.0021378426,0.009299685,0.098701835,0.12334808,0.42823824],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034392514,0.0012315622,0.018965263,0.00128618,0.00015905325,0.004922858,0.13968918,0.007387024,0.024138236,0.114692934,0.68694377,0.0002400245],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023333773,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.030545633,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99785215,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004489616,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0057179234,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.046395957},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400482629","doi":"10.55016/ojs/cpai.v1i1.52759","title":"Academic Advisors as Valuable Partners for Supporting Academic Integrity","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Perspectives on Academic Integrity","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Academic integrity; Research integrity; Business; Psychology; Public relations; Political science; Social psychology","score_opus":0.06353938119318447,"score_gpt":0.41117953735930346,"score_spread":0.347640156166119,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400482629","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.061978184,0.008248661,0.016930306,0.3272107,0.0059382264,0.00043139505,0.00021625232,0.0006866811,0.57835966],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7914974,0.0038427298,0.007523847,0.021708231,0.0011803712,0.0001613326,0.000120334815,0.0002873726,0.17367837],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9262282,0.047186844,0.0018083303,0.0026786607,0.013501142,0.008596842],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8156539,0.033420775,0.01618799,0.009838484,0.0421501,0.08274874],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.030136991,0.0007041828,0.0008175732,0.0042687855,0.03903422,0.027602307,0.0039915387,0.008300865,0.04841301],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09845883,0.0007919326,0.00052937574,0.0039592264,0.021458933,0.014908975,0.023878913,0.012940167,0.011244836],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015491397,0.00018940115,0.007270414,0.0003281982,0.00004849647,0.002645888,0.2508273,0.00023466923,0.0012373117,0.43894097,0.20233954,0.09578279],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002709957,0.000052248146,0.0016306882,0.0003963351,0.000019382822,0.0007056363,0.09582734,0.0002527306,0.00039413385,0.030669676,0.86993814,0.00008664472],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.048115306,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.070302635,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99169916,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018857561,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.055473823,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16195762},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400482632","doi":"10.55016/ojs/cpai.v3i1.69768","title":"Methodological Decisions in Undertaking Academic Integrity Policy Analysis: Considerations for Future Research","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Perspectives on Academic Integrity","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; University of Manitoba; University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Research integrity; Academic integrity; Engineering ethics; Management science; Political science; Engineering","score_opus":0.47070538490822916,"score_gpt":0.5190155712497355,"score_spread":0.048310186341506356,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400482632","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":"methods","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012273217,0.020028079,0.12492405,0.8061111,0.013497031,0.011071265,0.00049705245,0.0003631355,0.011235138],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.18958756,0.013257077,0.5833287,0.14354074,0.0046948716,0.062027052,0.00054556073,0.0005269875,0.0024914038],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.11667711,0.7932313,0.045652725,0.005928293,0.032111373,0.00639926],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.044966165,0.8079982,0.023715137,0.03975847,0.07472545,0.008836614],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.841748,0.00285085,0.005926935,0.011014801,0.016848816,0.034030903,0.01472925,0.020538528,0.008495062],"category_scores_gemma":[0.90613496,0.0036167747,0.0054730084,0.016685268,0.04121608,0.05108885,0.017506227,0.027598754,0.0021898034],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0018705172,0.0015038796,0.020912545,0.025509685,0.001534633,0.0017370426,0.16028124,0.0054191365,0.0010005952,0.42509305,0.110074535,0.24506319],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010236966,0.0008189986,0.007892568,0.1158264,0.0010831932,0.0011762661,0.20753212,0.010341291,0.0020461662,0.46237588,0.1887159,0.0011674982],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.038969543,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08332875,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9794615,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04800542,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.22293028,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34830528},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400482634","doi":"10.55016/ojs/cpai.v4i2.74167","title":"Promising Practices and Emerging Ideas in Academic Integrity Policy Development","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Perspectives on Academic Integrity","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Athabasca University","funders":"","keywords":"Academic integrity; Engineering ethics; Research integrity; Political science; Process management; Business; Engineering","score_opus":0.056113390415950946,"score_gpt":0.38598599103544745,"score_spread":0.3298726006194965,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400482634","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.025276603,0.00764867,0.009339001,0.9168525,0.00063504116,0.000118147604,0.00007622822,0.000099423094,0.03995443],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90861285,0.015263868,0.027331652,0.036768656,0.0005744581,0.00027787455,0.00013991026,0.00010670998,0.010924054],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.86863285,0.08864956,0.0043752366,0.0070141647,0.017383527,0.013944663],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.722348,0.18547812,0.010095557,0.0147634335,0.045133397,0.0221816],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.14216179,0.0007258021,0.00077547785,0.008585348,0.042043358,0.04852756,0.007727742,0.014130788,0.007065665],"category_scores_gemma":[0.13288812,0.0010379114,0.00094786874,0.013230184,0.06218833,0.030966643,0.011546688,0.018534077,0.00076697476],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000053251046,0.00017214107,0.008180304,0.00072302995,0.000030774376,0.00051244616,0.20490608,0.0008977857,0.0006504788,0.68342006,0.022884555,0.0775691],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003099331,0.000069980386,0.0049756547,0.002428085,0.000021773309,0.00016003431,0.5122835,0.0017390505,0.0011151806,0.18145755,0.29553398,0.00018415252],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3811605,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.37091982,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9858692,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13258328,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.18665498,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9619635},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400482635","doi":"10.55016/ojs/cpai.v4i2.74186","title":"Remediation: Understanding Academic Integrity","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Perspectives on Academic Integrity","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Academic integrity; Environmental remediation; Environmental science; Engineering ethics; Engineering; Biology; Ecology; Contamination","score_opus":0.08894919807297942,"score_gpt":0.34756833925062014,"score_spread":0.25861914117764073,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400482635","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06939181,0.012423158,0.025098167,0.59280723,0.0013454739,0.00020627264,0.00008167867,0.00030650207,0.29833966],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9571724,0.004888613,0.0050047957,0.017109033,0.00036474108,0.000079655794,0.00004777281,0.00008583219,0.015247158],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9683087,0.015361225,0.0010214271,0.001963261,0.007410298,0.0059350915],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94884694,0.016162269,0.006869763,0.004621691,0.014831232,0.008667927],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.026017863,0.00081736443,0.00090118614,0.0057341517,0.047295798,0.029972736,0.005698867,0.013835124,0.0050885347],"category_scores_gemma":[0.059326127,0.0005008354,0.0008223033,0.0037509652,0.13822758,0.029702285,0.02094054,0.01884682,0.0010228446],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018134662,0.000058319303,0.0039017643,0.00020109581,0.000011421104,0.0006939185,0.39227682,0.00048045936,0.00023804477,0.55337816,0.014354698,0.034387145],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014132464,0.000041743566,0.004461893,0.0009575755,0.000018995286,0.0005492004,0.36493102,0.0009149867,0.0005732785,0.33050647,0.2969392,0.000091564085],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4288671,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.32660303,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98616487,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08101329,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.116110235,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8527416},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400482637","doi":"10.55016/ojs/cpai.v2i1.61826","title":"Evaluation of a Tutorial Designed to Promote Academic Integrity","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Perspectives on Academic Integrity","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Academic integrity; Research integrity; Computer science; Engineering ethics; Psychology; Engineering","score_opus":0.05212534734288214,"score_gpt":0.36036062487741094,"score_spread":0.3082352775345288,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400482637","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97645193,0.00055783737,0.011430568,0.0005338967,0.00038290527,0.00513923,0.0005276109,0.0012520938,0.0037238686],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9174755,0.0010289627,0.06505831,0.0005258719,0.00017789353,0.0060459464,0.001535374,0.00011915322,0.00803305],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99795663,0.0009870102,0.00020339448,0.0002588497,0.00041159167,0.00018245641],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98719704,0.006355025,0.0009897455,0.0008706753,0.0025552188,0.0020323],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0061505344,0.0008771,0.00079681724,0.0009430863,0.0006129722,0.00093721505,0.0013034348,0.0014890529,0.0054671275],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02731613,0.0003031404,0.0010194115,0.0002304443,0.00036499972,0.0011172801,0.0011914071,0.0010480569,0.0009800947],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.023314776,0.09369845,0.021338677,0.0067520873,0.0006729995,0.0013753589,0.005564061,0.0041700643,0.043824874,0.0013238497,0.014842537,0.78312224],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.02090648,0.5569604,0.18242227,0.003347331,0.002804524,0.0032026637,0.004365624,0.032815274,0.108889915,0.0026335188,0.080930844,0.0007211765],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007063023,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011697955,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99851096,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00066222704,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015450426,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.032527506},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400482638","doi":"10.55016/ojs/cpai.v3i2.71652","title":"My journey to becoming an academic integrity specialist","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Perspectives on Academic Integrity","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Red River College","funders":"","keywords":"Academic integrity; Engineering ethics; Psychology; Engineering","score_opus":0.10785934004635284,"score_gpt":0.37302354741467647,"score_spread":0.26516420736832363,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400482638","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0009535074,0.0040265243,0.00014124229,0.97711587,0.0064252676,0.000013134385,0.000031774744,0.0000129594955,0.011279719],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.10304642,0.02135714,0.0020561689,0.741892,0.00833624,0.00012509811,0.00010542458,0.00014005648,0.12294149],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9595631,0.007142978,0.00087220967,0.0017838731,0.011768163,0.018869614],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8148214,0.009812302,0.0031131578,0.0010749217,0.03340928,0.13776888],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.028744383,0.0011360958,0.0015809768,0.004073359,0.09741289,0.037390962,0.0062565054,0.030982157,0.029748889],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05134021,0.0010588443,0.0015012816,0.004678435,0.048989203,0.015542277,0.019571869,0.05703394,0.0063364683],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029682446,0.000066616434,0.0006399158,0.00014299751,0.000015114532,0.0006555928,0.034182377,0.00007184101,0.0001222164,0.09809293,0.85528725,0.010693394],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018406845,0.000020367563,0.00059344596,0.000582803,0.000008489541,0.00036149708,0.08403144,0.00004554343,0.000057795252,0.012182227,0.9020234,0.000074599775],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.87493646,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9386139,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96901786,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.14165817,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.4342932,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99555486},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400482640","doi":"10.55016/ojs/cpai.v4i2.74185","title":"Resolving the Ambiguous Expectations of Academic Integrity","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Perspectives on Academic Integrity","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Academic integrity; Research integrity; Psychology; Engineering ethics; Computer science; Social psychology; Engineering","score_opus":0.04143225413093755,"score_gpt":0.338334783619265,"score_spread":0.29690252948832746,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400482640","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21528253,0.0036192536,0.006356578,0.5289948,0.0018944688,0.00012709651,0.00012777126,0.00018426069,0.24341331],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94979364,0.0014237,0.0016424119,0.015557794,0.0001314731,0.000030794312,0.00003483441,0.00008496779,0.031300426],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9770025,0.006815423,0.000531815,0.0011264306,0.0077015115,0.006822277],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96577835,0.007969399,0.0022734674,0.0012373573,0.011218854,0.011522631],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018219683,0.00039442762,0.00064627506,0.0015512073,0.07154149,0.029243698,0.003992667,0.0076342616,0.007617157],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03418871,0.00047995147,0.0005248867,0.002139633,0.042515982,0.008676757,0.0139411455,0.014144639,0.0012487104],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005800887,0.000059028287,0.0080793835,0.00014290672,0.000012780368,0.0009611883,0.5849877,0.00025007263,0.0010073157,0.26151645,0.10589449,0.037030656],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009615959,0.000033056174,0.0073343576,0.00037093024,0.000013801984,0.0002754806,0.6156238,0.00034980252,0.0010090509,0.02614066,0.34873477,0.00010477695],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8881268,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.94041246,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9923657,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.14181548,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2521609,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9953724},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400482641","doi":"10.55016/ojs/cpai.v4i2.74165","title":"Learn by Doing: An Academic Integrity Policy Revision","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Perspectives on Academic Integrity","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Assiniboine Community College","funders":"","keywords":"Academic integrity; Research integrity; Political science; Psychology; Engineering ethics; Business; Public relations; Social psychology; Engineering","score_opus":0.034405221205608426,"score_gpt":0.357553643426967,"score_spread":0.3231484222213586,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400482641","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009029746,0.000897403,0.009944601,0.94222325,0.0048086015,0.0006636132,0.00007929502,0.00033267812,0.0320208],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.32179174,0.0019537567,0.06564912,0.4816109,0.0020230052,0.0010276417,0.00025447473,0.0007387337,0.12495074],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.7159705,0.08077543,0.01876398,0.01868074,0.1220448,0.04376446],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.57242775,0.11198049,0.015855469,0.032594472,0.20240568,0.06473618],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.23039128,0.0011416397,0.0016790527,0.0046702535,0.06744636,0.05245229,0.012354757,0.048424367,0.008268524],"category_scores_gemma":[0.31186053,0.0022980638,0.0029561329,0.004092129,0.03678754,0.024518844,0.023233062,0.05993188,0.0027691636],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011951768,0.00041404483,0.0044370755,0.0004730164,0.000102690974,0.0021568537,0.102529176,0.001886302,0.0025576171,0.41401035,0.38958183,0.0817315],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000044038938,0.00009934394,0.0015390639,0.00069088064,0.000041711253,0.00025445144,0.039699223,0.0010175904,0.00165399,0.02367411,0.93099755,0.00028803642],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5122704,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.49816367,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95157564,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.17597505,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.49573666,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9812039},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400482642","doi":"10.55016/ojs/cpai.v1i1.43375","title":"Academic Integrity Outreach: supporting high school students for success in higher education","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Perspectives on Academic Integrity","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Outreach; Academic integrity; Medical education; Mathematics education; Psychology; Computer science; Political science; Medicine; Library science","score_opus":0.05648085155324686,"score_gpt":0.39903191589364984,"score_spread":0.342551064340403,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400482642","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12464911,0.0066500828,0.0045870366,0.66085345,0.003990101,0.0004671592,0.00017878776,0.00057998294,0.19804437],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85216564,0.0086150495,0.014313429,0.050510004,0.0011122663,0.0003223061,0.00022854596,0.0002470563,0.07248577],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9804576,0.007323767,0.00041052257,0.0006985176,0.004093851,0.0070157493],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9101041,0.0066674286,0.0034961142,0.0017446586,0.011769833,0.066217855],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015965594,0.00076998497,0.00085859373,0.0024021342,0.074066825,0.02312785,0.005326644,0.008640946,0.017452441],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02998774,0.0006870849,0.0005921927,0.0028364393,0.02051379,0.009553375,0.033824723,0.014329061,0.0026212875],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000121316654,0.0012083176,0.029409664,0.0011148994,0.000043507003,0.0013531069,0.30041245,0.0002911146,0.0012327189,0.06939311,0.29463896,0.30078083],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000042824056,0.0002193124,0.032684807,0.0014557965,0.00003706548,0.0003698122,0.47604242,0.0001664127,0.0013223329,0.01814782,0.46936327,0.00014812173],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5336027,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8286909,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99135906,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.043054707,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.32508698,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.938288},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400482644","doi":"10.55016/ojs/cpai.v4i2.74174","title":"Encouraging Academic Integrity Through a Preventative Framework","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Perspectives on Academic Integrity","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Langara College","funders":"","keywords":"Academic integrity; Research integrity; Psychology; Computer science; Engineering ethics; Engineering; Social psychology","score_opus":0.05116800912072478,"score_gpt":0.3756730951378219,"score_spread":0.3245050860170971,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400482644","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.039567847,0.0031603675,0.38724038,0.29056823,0.0016769744,0.002338313,0.00008571987,0.001964393,0.27339777],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7104653,0.0018501354,0.2371399,0.019812291,0.00027412575,0.0027018911,0.00007653062,0.0003615159,0.027318344],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.7467791,0.18299477,0.008237787,0.007316278,0.047022395,0.0076497956],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.74893606,0.12682953,0.020143397,0.042390373,0.042558476,0.019142175],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.14703064,0.0015350372,0.0008746202,0.0065056714,0.029203992,0.029676523,0.008255252,0.011778769,0.0044211205],"category_scores_gemma":[0.16170298,0.0015068867,0.001582516,0.0023151052,0.086606115,0.02712844,0.042546235,0.02065674,0.0018385664],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032885982,0.00032561005,0.002189435,0.00061506144,0.000030915682,0.0004244642,0.16422792,0.0014012584,0.001072546,0.74510545,0.01782649,0.06674785],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006329551,0.00023224938,0.0015588822,0.0026824158,0.000054834407,0.0010776899,0.087710604,0.0024600038,0.004367611,0.3698404,0.52968925,0.00026271425],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016291829,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020866074,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9882212,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.028644461,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0885643,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.77758163},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400482647","doi":"10.55016/ojs/cpai.v4i2.74188","title":"A New Framework for Enhancing (Academic) Integrity","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Perspectives on Academic Integrity","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Holland College","funders":"","keywords":"Academic integrity; Research integrity; Computer science; Process management; Business; Engineering ethics; Engineering; Library science","score_opus":0.04372738015871748,"score_gpt":0.3553249030111322,"score_spread":0.3115975228524147,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400482647","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0064139455,0.0065123998,0.05395341,0.18758515,0.0010722177,0.00035861626,0.00019417537,0.00020001044,0.7437101],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8228447,0.009932037,0.07240128,0.019769784,0.0006232746,0.000561124,0.00021186948,0.00024893408,0.073406965],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.96871644,0.014380218,0.00091572484,0.0022448755,0.008932632,0.0048100264],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97270954,0.0056187543,0.001123813,0.001816109,0.012347156,0.006384677],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.027703023,0.0015631388,0.0008903061,0.007168077,0.030099949,0.026245795,0.00504886,0.0088395355,0.006837101],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017825413,0.0005969856,0.001262084,0.005266627,0.1343885,0.014066795,0.012765935,0.011635159,0.001287056],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000025990519,0.0000066085845,0.00022536165,0.00004512858,0.0000029610517,0.00004751719,0.00546163,0.00017359613,0.000043373133,0.98627275,0.0043879235,0.003330507],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017326947,0.00001935248,0.0012830823,0.0008018798,0.00002492735,0.00020311875,0.01633945,0.00086852966,0.00020382057,0.62465096,0.35551542,0.000072137256],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8150575,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8144747,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99116045,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.16279161,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2421249,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97104305},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400482649","doi":"10.55016/ojs/cpai.v4i2.74166","title":"Insights on Academic Integrity Policy Development: Crafting Policy Catered to Your Institution","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Perspectives on Academic Integrity","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Camosun College","funders":"","keywords":"Institution; Academic integrity; Business; Political science; Engineering ethics; Engineering","score_opus":0.057740228762931445,"score_gpt":0.360359925287271,"score_spread":0.30261969652433957,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400482649","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006439078,0.0039701387,0.0024367757,0.8551368,0.0012201297,0.00011440821,0.00006590544,0.00006884478,0.13054803],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.677996,0.024350356,0.013077303,0.21894203,0.0016267619,0.00022155998,0.00015095151,0.00027130725,0.06336376],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9266198,0.027648423,0.0017780971,0.002101222,0.02011891,0.021733439],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8850532,0.052426398,0.00384559,0.002977031,0.033663817,0.022033982],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.063906044,0.0008525947,0.0011884776,0.006124775,0.060954053,0.05937028,0.005638229,0.025414083,0.013322327],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10360422,0.0010041608,0.0011075141,0.008061149,0.05609915,0.023125932,0.015777925,0.029237946,0.0020485655],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023105506,0.000050579816,0.00083751586,0.00025405575,0.000013020631,0.0004960386,0.041260336,0.0008075662,0.00019063462,0.82463413,0.111636326,0.019796629],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025167425,0.000024179308,0.0012854809,0.0013906356,0.000021739419,0.00013960525,0.12082544,0.0007961215,0.00043506714,0.1419326,0.73296356,0.00016039406],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.85124844,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8756765,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9745859,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.25793144,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.50315845,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.86069435},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400482653","doi":"10.55016/ojs/cpai.v4i2.74173","title":"Student Voices in Academic Integrity","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Perspectives on Academic Integrity","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Langara College","funders":"","keywords":"Academic integrity; Research integrity; Academic dishonesty; Psychology; Engineering ethics; Cheating; Social psychology; Engineering","score_opus":0.042196785589645625,"score_gpt":0.3675141885887048,"score_spread":0.3253174029990592,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400482653","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08044284,0.011129757,0.0009861628,0.49789938,0.0031802075,0.00004776315,0.000096547825,0.00008399723,0.40613332],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90628827,0.0038806496,0.00019783337,0.035340704,0.000992194,0.000022271095,0.000039835035,0.00008396916,0.05315428],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9754514,0.011257148,0.00040679303,0.0011173962,0.0045946576,0.0071725557],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97240394,0.010602752,0.0019566757,0.0013337382,0.004707546,0.008995294],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016653769,0.00048894907,0.0008156621,0.0026917448,0.076850824,0.03024485,0.0024759974,0.011758328,0.016573844],"category_scores_gemma":[0.033470586,0.00039447463,0.00051532534,0.0044920146,0.055822223,0.013873234,0.01901736,0.019157683,0.0017233489],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004091269,0.000029189501,0.0020216566,0.00008519963,0.00000850614,0.00039387553,0.40934592,0.000059147624,0.00019037485,0.5019187,0.06592964,0.01997697],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014986326,0.00003089692,0.0020139746,0.00029333885,0.000008585995,0.0001967136,0.3214565,0.000084918785,0.00026732136,0.027644012,0.6479323,0.000056486166],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.40841898,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4288145,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9882417,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.049595807,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04741772,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8120834},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400482654","doi":"10.55016/ojs/cpai.v1i1.53121","title":"Reflections on academic integrity and academic dishonesty: How did we get here, and how do we get out?","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Perspectives on Academic Integrity","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Academic dishonesty; Academic integrity; Dishonesty; Psychology; Cheating; Social psychology","score_opus":0.06702713484254193,"score_gpt":0.3676613895498667,"score_spread":0.3006342547073248,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400482654","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08433505,0.0075217593,0.002934084,0.8456882,0.0056770914,0.00010116561,0.000103697326,0.0000808158,0.0535581],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.84338075,0.009014799,0.0020151036,0.10966098,0.0017456902,0.00008253323,0.000056565543,0.00027835686,0.03376523],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9419213,0.029697407,0.0014557593,0.0030496933,0.013925067,0.0099506965],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9196835,0.031945296,0.005476934,0.0030555765,0.022938026,0.016900739],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.031026237,0.0011016327,0.0011961665,0.0026369558,0.07925756,0.028879043,0.0056345197,0.018162495,0.004829199],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08962512,0.00087741687,0.0009567027,0.0039168173,0.09069682,0.020049011,0.01978061,0.05901179,0.0013356354],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013489376,0.000022292777,0.0009282711,0.00007606448,0.0000062362315,0.0007391787,0.9405046,0.0000517218,0.0002480746,0.028525844,0.023713058,0.0051711346],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000034280101,0.000011288352,0.00044741711,0.00025612026,0.0000043126934,0.00025309995,0.85719967,0.0000344554,0.00020741667,0.003412225,0.13811983,0.00005068249],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5035916,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5537066,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9818375,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.072015904,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06976657,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986637},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400482661","doi":"10.55016/ojs/cpai.v3i1.70256","title":"Preventing online shopping for completed assessments: Protecting students by blocking access to contract cheating websites on institutional networks","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Perspectives on Academic Integrity","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba; Red River College; Assiniboine Community College","funders":"","keywords":"Cheating; Blocking (statistics); Business; Internet privacy; Computer security; Computer science; Psychology; Computer network; Social psychology","score_opus":0.09908752420155016,"score_gpt":0.42104111424447815,"score_spread":0.321953590042928,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400482661","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6708937,0.0028017864,0.020615725,0.10225728,0.00030700577,0.0010069044,0.00022735531,0.0006071446,0.20128314],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96074694,0.0014373305,0.00998271,0.010196931,0.00010936199,0.00021057569,0.00011944697,0.00006184936,0.01713494],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99324024,0.0026915113,0.00020000403,0.00036501852,0.0019066235,0.0015965606],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96374345,0.0075959433,0.006005921,0.004522819,0.008093072,0.010038744],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009949529,0.00045250083,0.00042830134,0.0016619128,0.01325537,0.0084204795,0.0036035394,0.0029914635,0.007561237],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04193839,0.00039526305,0.00044478188,0.0016378876,0.0052291094,0.0038524822,0.0061824135,0.005193594,0.002270741],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022806271,0.0023567558,0.22555618,0.000512368,0.00007838288,0.000849534,0.07069212,0.00066889275,0.004419031,0.046488047,0.08716498,0.5609856],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018450912,0.0017805083,0.3954807,0.0028741283,0.00022677616,0.0018801416,0.116485536,0.0069368584,0.0154584125,0.036059428,0.42228827,0.00034468574],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.18142971,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.28693005,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18142971,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006893182,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05074858,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36074734},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400482669","doi":"10.55016/ojs/cpai.v4i2.74168","title":"ESL Student Perspectives on Problems and Solutions for Academic Integrity","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Perspectives on Academic Integrity","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Thompson Rivers University","funders":"","keywords":"Academic integrity; Research integrity; Mathematics education; Engineering ethics; Psychology; Computer science; Engineering","score_opus":0.06360839734941658,"score_gpt":0.3528300335601717,"score_spread":0.2892216362107551,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400482669","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3626009,0.008493185,0.005287913,0.43533254,0.0026108366,0.00008639713,0.0001630495,0.00026674516,0.1851584],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9267655,0.005987597,0.0014481213,0.027405037,0.0008912024,0.000049355414,0.00009160416,0.00013020891,0.037231326],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.97789544,0.011261111,0.00080741866,0.0010344292,0.0053465785,0.0036550774],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9732747,0.006602024,0.004247543,0.0013712868,0.0058036735,0.008700729],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017430222,0.0006991106,0.00068484654,0.0024590048,0.020319767,0.0277745,0.0031011484,0.008739764,0.014050152],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03119393,0.0004360936,0.00079857005,0.0027267663,0.018559761,0.01660508,0.02052544,0.0162583,0.0034851443],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000074454096,0.0002628639,0.014298293,0.00034625048,0.000031641088,0.0025113395,0.7335953,0.00023744603,0.00071799994,0.112387225,0.07597643,0.059560772],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011359471,0.00008066913,0.0020478447,0.00043049044,0.000011883207,0.0013367289,0.69814265,0.0002449915,0.00046448276,0.016345872,0.28083146,0.000051637253],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025640787,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0034851993,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0277745,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008819192,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010796192,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09218091},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400482674","doi":"10.55016/ojs/cpai.v2i2.68091","title":"The International Dimension of Academic Integrity: An Integrative Literature Review","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Perspectives on Academic Integrity","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Medicine Hat College","funders":"","keywords":"Dimension (graph theory); Academic integrity; Psychology; Mathematics; Social psychology","score_opus":0.018985289177233033,"score_gpt":0.3309890302235436,"score_spread":0.31200374104631057,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400482674","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00055912614,0.9949368,0.00013546333,0.0015946723,0.00014405538,0.000027612956,0.00006535734,0.0000044682974,0.0025323564],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.005903979,0.99298567,0.00034535135,0.00041301365,0.00007832809,0.000029289118,0.000056369958,0.0000029795258,0.00018506986],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","domain_scores_codex":[0.99668163,0.00091371225,0.0006000815,0.00027460008,0.0012348427,0.0002950986],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.977112,0.014117816,0.002110947,0.00035346873,0.0055617024,0.0007440003],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0059647574,0.0010043096,0.0023687817,0.018957034,0.0030266577,0.0069972584,0.0021877466,0.001729183,0.0052977875],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01694302,0.00073127233,0.001937057,0.025901536,0.0033380445,0.004501537,0.0025536232,0.0022095374,0.0005007736],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000094834024,0.00011609495,0.0054950546,0.2532695,0.0011879592,0.0007044097,0.009549587,0.00043041736,0.00029776405,0.023229843,0.040345266,0.6652794],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019409235,0.000067244626,0.019164912,0.48823315,0.0031413967,0.001211419,0.0126344655,0.00019062686,0.00020795072,0.005231324,0.4697953,0.000102890706],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.22409847,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4180165,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22409847,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013744932,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0733561,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.44558817},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400482678","doi":"10.55016/ojs/cpai.v4i2.74187","title":"Managing Academic Integrity in Canadian Engineering Schools","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Perspectives on Academic Integrity","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Regina","funders":"","keywords":"Academic integrity; Research integrity; Structural integrity; Engineering management; Engineering ethics; Engineering; Political science","score_opus":0.024789754950424153,"score_gpt":0.3064330872225871,"score_spread":0.281643332272163,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400482678","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.51923734,0.008452256,0.0034058436,0.2235604,0.0010598178,0.0004446588,0.00034327555,0.00037437436,0.24312213],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9390031,0.0032493626,0.0026269297,0.008295508,0.00010875643,0.00006054408,0.00012030939,0.000064428066,0.046470944],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.96812373,0.005056861,0.000859404,0.0017926325,0.0129180495,0.011249392],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9312602,0.0043701036,0.0050654965,0.0012177567,0.033756115,0.024330352],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017175734,0.00054349506,0.00062533055,0.0057935053,0.08021467,0.01931745,0.0050278725,0.0050128405,0.008314984],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027310012,0.00094527635,0.00063996314,0.009132698,0.0144139975,0.004324705,0.012087618,0.005429273,0.0009985861],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016170609,0.00043459793,0.14426185,0.00067155197,0.00008725707,0.002291587,0.23230939,0.002721183,0.0018147889,0.16916631,0.20761879,0.23846106],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003435115,0.00018005035,0.12141991,0.00063636753,0.000073101386,0.000372545,0.2500044,0.0015822754,0.0015048339,0.010966485,0.6129032,0.00032244466],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98091793,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9931607,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98091793,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.2651666,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.5209215,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.85230255},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400482679","doi":"10.55016/ojs/cpai.v2i2.69454","title":"Reflections on the 2019 Canadian Symposium on Academic Integrity","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Perspectives on Academic Integrity","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Academic integrity; Research integrity; Structural integrity; Engineering ethics; Political science; Engineering","score_opus":0.04574804236803998,"score_gpt":0.3519775740513231,"score_spread":0.30622953168328315,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400482679","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00026272953,0.007796815,0.00008961096,0.94739,0.03676916,0.000015801157,0.00006999898,0.000017019005,0.007588851],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.025189172,0.022767711,0.0009031844,0.856612,0.035859052,0.00007537487,0.00019645045,0.00020086934,0.058196165],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9226719,0.010874602,0.0022179354,0.003966135,0.043127853,0.017141573],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.87968725,0.020767245,0.0036514685,0.0024744351,0.056096807,0.03732282],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.036172263,0.0016264019,0.0020401313,0.0035132475,0.039964855,0.029907258,0.0071518915,0.038093407,0.018306062],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09262846,0.001357046,0.002523494,0.0061117816,0.02947342,0.009886704,0.013342356,0.07569735,0.006346435],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000172311,0.0000069002504,0.00008833036,0.00005977945,0.000007018692,0.0001286207,0.002356918,0.000022983797,0.000062165476,0.0074774795,0.9871084,0.0026642035],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007704747,0.000005368766,0.00027504994,0.00021682365,0.000006841166,0.000065565015,0.0040219887,0.000012893071,0.000059743994,0.0012536752,0.99402606,0.000048247384],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7937693,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8656753,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8609104,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13908961,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.22520047,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998534},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400482685","doi":"10.55016/ojs/cpai.v4i2.74220","title":"Capturing Academic Integrity at the University of Lethbridge","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Perspectives on Academic Integrity","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"","keywords":"Academic integrity; Research integrity; Political science; Engineering ethics; Engineering","score_opus":0.0347525536356185,"score_gpt":0.29273485985308595,"score_spread":0.2579823062174674,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400482685","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91125804,0.0011094726,0.0018981281,0.013426232,0.00014365441,0.00055292225,0.003675174,0.00043301712,0.067503385],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9489694,0.00094863307,0.004835536,0.0030098732,0.000114268485,0.00065031304,0.0017911576,0.00007574116,0.039605036],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9942204,0.0014442722,0.00022103687,0.0005724969,0.0021800208,0.0013618252],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9764298,0.0019750632,0.0025196073,0.0013184579,0.009955076,0.007802068],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0041279006,0.00036701982,0.00039716694,0.0030344203,0.008999431,0.0054613515,0.0028077944,0.00113357,0.019788215],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013441907,0.00042348146,0.000227692,0.0032062847,0.0019318167,0.0026925206,0.008089386,0.0021271808,0.0052305586],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00035724454,0.0006923513,0.5171102,0.000503969,0.00005845917,0.0020227933,0.1201529,0.00058448047,0.0055054277,0.007622819,0.14123967,0.20414966],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026985683,0.0003949021,0.5501999,0.0005555878,0.000023574645,0.0004575343,0.15991482,0.001366933,0.0029974016,0.0017663634,0.28210795,0.0001879853],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2717197,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.43066314,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2717197,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01524197,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.022082824,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5402762},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400482686","doi":"10.55016/ojs/cpai.v1i2.56983","title":"Academic Integrity Pledges -- Acculturating Students to Integrity within Canadian Higher Education","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Perspectives on Academic Integrity","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Humber Polytechnic","funders":"","keywords":"Academic integrity; Structural integrity; Territorial integrity; Research integrity; Political science; Personal Integrity; Membrane integrity; Psychology; Law; Engineering; Public relations; Social psychology; Chemistry","score_opus":0.053794651784380476,"score_gpt":0.3856394912093709,"score_spread":0.33184483942499043,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400482686","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11676841,0.02282737,0.0038053219,0.46898735,0.003556066,0.0001939244,0.00016962177,0.00018763899,0.38350424],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8708961,0.01688311,0.0038395147,0.020849766,0.00036946582,0.00004863486,0.000101550984,0.00007602162,0.08693582],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.986692,0.0028391911,0.0004272007,0.00058881857,0.0054461155,0.0040065483],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96329105,0.004811145,0.0027909616,0.0011795172,0.01373485,0.014192494],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009419297,0.00051806914,0.00048561525,0.0024664374,0.048575938,0.01420221,0.0031077021,0.0045798603,0.010352252],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023536494,0.00027081073,0.00060271623,0.0038593195,0.027877899,0.005176262,0.009791543,0.008107895,0.0010474245],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000057195386,0.0001642586,0.02852178,0.00092886196,0.000030253628,0.0017226709,0.24394941,0.00041561766,0.0010718772,0.30871055,0.1432767,0.2711509],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009892931,0.00008697908,0.034239203,0.0010867665,0.000031630883,0.00061819947,0.23011027,0.00017024807,0.0008901681,0.01886186,0.71373004,0.00016482387],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9422627,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97968024,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9422627,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11425954,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.31558686,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8290149},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400482692","doi":"10.55016/ojs/cpai.v4i2.74176","title":"Strengthening a Culture of Academic Integrity across a Faculty of Health Sciences &amp; Wellness in the Face of COVID-19","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Perspectives on Academic Integrity","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Humber Polytechnic","funders":"","keywords":"Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Academic integrity; 2019-20 coronavirus outbreak; Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2); Face (sociological concept); Health science; Biomedical sciences; Sociology; Engineering ethics; Political science; Medical education; Virology; Medicine; Social science; Nursing; Engineering","score_opus":0.09446896773546844,"score_gpt":0.4250027377113478,"score_spread":0.33053376997587935,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400482692","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14422895,0.001874446,0.012029478,0.77000046,0.004069491,0.00063285243,0.00005565231,0.000253325,0.06685539],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.900368,0.0020770018,0.014497703,0.05746228,0.0007543779,0.0003209725,0.000053528485,0.00011562727,0.024350561],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9621162,0.017199313,0.0012425007,0.0014614235,0.007831251,0.01014939],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.89363974,0.009107577,0.0054807384,0.0039812196,0.01696024,0.07083048],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.034650553,0.00050143374,0.00075723307,0.0015020445,0.051904943,0.023123179,0.0039961594,0.006955231,0.0050451243],"category_scores_gemma":[0.044736266,0.0006660339,0.0007352252,0.0012533147,0.023417639,0.010463327,0.037177976,0.025609238,0.0009592272],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011708827,0.00093080266,0.036861174,0.00049117027,0.00007909031,0.0024372418,0.44577834,0.0010761637,0.0031384393,0.14191067,0.15978767,0.20739217],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026169748,0.00043218175,0.018093845,0.0009318093,0.000028855606,0.0005901351,0.48033577,0.0008875705,0.001465932,0.027150571,0.4698947,0.00016242467],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0701137,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15131088,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9930448,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.026148988,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.19321616,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1897251},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400482696","doi":"10.55016/ojs/cpai.v1i1.43358","title":"Editorial: Inaugural issue - Sarah Elaine Eaton","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"editorial","venue":"Canadian Perspectives on Academic Integrity","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"History; Art history","score_opus":0.01433959663626801,"score_gpt":0.326436631039634,"score_spread":0.312097034403366,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400482696","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00003835427,0.0038293018,0.00006031292,0.103221744,0.88959086,0.00002556939,0.00006790561,0.000037931764,0.0031280161],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.001981136,0.008425927,0.00014626484,0.08936062,0.86935705,0.000044533102,0.00010513392,0.000094739946,0.03048456],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9868155,0.0013688513,0.00080257404,0.001177479,0.00870771,0.0011278489],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.92879283,0.009272209,0.0019449976,0.0008413519,0.05160689,0.0075415964],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008095177,0.0025814848,0.002541175,0.004703343,0.008008599,0.011593433,0.0039195493,0.0150870755,0.023076903],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05583456,0.0006451525,0.0015634388,0.0024778328,0.0037113712,0.0041948096,0.0018434279,0.016809406,0.011550564],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009240199,0.0000027065282,0.000018042034,0.000046783374,0.0000027613867,0.000037117734,0.000020237978,0.000004445211,0.000011668025,0.00020377449,0.9985929,0.0010502024],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002345081,0.0000079330985,0.00023372922,0.00036859195,0.000015135438,0.00013069612,0.00016288944,0.000046007866,0.00005688315,0.00042238663,0.9985134,0.000018863357],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.053219076,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12808001,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98491293,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015267256,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.025046693,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11077219},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400482704","doi":"10.55016/ojs/cpai.v3i2.71655","title":"Neither abuse, nor neglect: A duty of care perspective on academic integrity","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Perspectives on Academic Integrity","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick; Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Neglect; Perspective (graphical); Academic integrity; Duty; Duty of care; Psychology; Psychiatry; Political science; Social psychology; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.03399404193766195,"score_gpt":0.32752160912745865,"score_spread":0.29352756718979667,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400482704","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014429679,0.019891275,0.008057974,0.69997555,0.0023505266,0.000069945956,0.000047527992,0.00003377453,0.25514376],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8422261,0.020554459,0.0056464514,0.09671425,0.0012217185,0.00009485615,0.000048871832,0.00006955607,0.033423785],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.956541,0.018577052,0.0017354464,0.0025311483,0.012044041,0.008571409],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9652584,0.011670128,0.0026774632,0.0015130055,0.009277381,0.009603592],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.024985727,0.00082607777,0.0011304773,0.0042995145,0.047529038,0.023613203,0.0051412205,0.016871413,0.0046646334],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02819508,0.0006309268,0.0010325974,0.003937318,0.18648592,0.019981874,0.018697167,0.026265921,0.00055784633],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005795382,0.000013398501,0.00037049013,0.0000652533,0.0000038717767,0.00024805285,0.069919355,0.000085404485,0.000052244417,0.91470516,0.008922003,0.005609027],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001730223,0.0000339818,0.0022375146,0.0021181211,0.000028202516,0.0009205591,0.15460177,0.00035230245,0.00018332672,0.38698202,0.45239106,0.00013382557],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.79960805,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.80580413,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9831286,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.12402736,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.21103846,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.89988565},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400482705","doi":"10.55016/ojs/cpai.v3i1.69404","title":"Creating a User-Based Website to Support Academic Integrity at the University of Waterloo","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Perspectives on Academic Integrity","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Academic integrity; Research integrity; Computer science; Data integrity; World Wide Web; Data science; Library science; Engineering; Database; Engineering ethics","score_opus":0.038226664944875116,"score_gpt":0.2941771333311913,"score_spread":0.2559504683863162,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400482705","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4034414,0.0014552202,0.038141225,0.09422115,0.0016949675,0.0019263251,0.0010759803,0.0073740953,0.45066956],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.65970474,0.0018076906,0.066225775,0.0073740627,0.0003755073,0.0006321968,0.00082162075,0.0012886288,0.26176974],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9949799,0.0019453949,0.00016039447,0.000271966,0.0018144206,0.0008279863],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9714471,0.003699491,0.0010230636,0.0021581256,0.0072132004,0.014459052],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0051987874,0.00015718487,0.0002852124,0.001260395,0.013732681,0.008105718,0.0017678097,0.0016410844,0.023622295],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013725831,0.00038726063,0.0003046766,0.0016138571,0.0034669456,0.00592254,0.005893102,0.0026615683,0.004947251],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016800824,0.0013322011,0.043324143,0.00039726438,0.0000351718,0.0012265609,0.084178895,0.0005791275,0.010131404,0.023716325,0.3997877,0.43512312],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003160394,0.0002249954,0.015733296,0.00013982492,0.000014666771,0.00025438875,0.023408134,0.0011446489,0.0022481307,0.001514789,0.955156,0.00012953006],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.30128518,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.61401904,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9983589,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009263986,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05386933,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.59906304},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400482710","doi":"10.55016/ojs/cpai.v2i1.68934","title":"Is this in my contract?: How part-time contract faculty face barriers to reporting academic integrity breaches","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Perspectives on Academic Integrity","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Academic integrity; Business; Face (sociological concept); Contract management; Data breach; Breach of contract; Internet privacy; Accounting; Public relations; Actuarial science; Computer security; Computer science; Marketing; Psychology; Political science; Law; Sociology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.04906063163901164,"score_gpt":0.3416120834145958,"score_spread":0.29255145177558417,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400482710","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.78224057,0.0018124514,0.005329385,0.16808014,0.00091767206,0.00021093478,0.00018868479,0.00014344924,0.041076712],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9820011,0.0010846693,0.0015243725,0.009400321,0.00008058199,0.000043403572,0.000055632412,0.00007079491,0.00573917],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9568319,0.020210413,0.0016506031,0.001992278,0.011704407,0.0076104994],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8770702,0.03729377,0.021012064,0.0059028366,0.029759387,0.028961701],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.035232037,0.00029117288,0.00061143644,0.0016327237,0.03550026,0.01751301,0.004371446,0.0037586815,0.008454288],"category_scores_gemma":[0.14653867,0.0005952326,0.00043690877,0.0031250936,0.016772391,0.008579221,0.010430089,0.0076949475,0.0011600461],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009023148,0.00012524605,0.07004528,0.00019658716,0.000032085085,0.0010575696,0.8278355,0.00014463185,0.0007514727,0.012614216,0.028242774,0.058864336],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006650265,0.000045213175,0.013322982,0.00032931406,0.000016316202,0.000390893,0.9453156,0.0002597349,0.00022939804,0.0017038378,0.03830734,0.00007271066],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6103282,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.68680954,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99624133,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03675791,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13001198,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7839333},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400482712","doi":"10.55016/ojs/cpai.v4i2.74227","title":"Scaffolding the Learning Opportunities: Academic Integrity at Douglas College","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Perspectives on Academic Integrity","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Douglas College","funders":"","keywords":"Academic integrity; Scaffold; Psychology; Research integrity; Mathematics education; Computer science; Engineering; Engineering ethics; Social psychology; Programming language","score_opus":0.08278009801447588,"score_gpt":0.3382667983771198,"score_spread":0.2554867003626439,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400482712","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.39289117,0.002309445,0.03675697,0.09113022,0.0030318617,0.0008133768,0.0006055407,0.0066219894,0.46583948],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7394987,0.00095629477,0.030929215,0.006357836,0.0003771063,0.00023961283,0.00037433754,0.000856048,0.22041091],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9936759,0.0023342785,0.00019909718,0.0006502238,0.0013610326,0.0017793601],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9702079,0.0019667328,0.0014973548,0.0017975216,0.0025746273,0.021955866],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005267072,0.00053082564,0.0003306227,0.0012557805,0.01215878,0.01422183,0.0022926081,0.0017205578,0.033513896],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015344578,0.00056015555,0.00035014472,0.0016686766,0.002878229,0.0073553664,0.018451562,0.0042988616,0.008178432],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003603197,0.0020484938,0.02052827,0.00021900228,0.000012350845,0.0010991698,0.117937,0.0005149515,0.004240596,0.03194256,0.30841452,0.5126828],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004312513,0.000261919,0.0071673607,0.0001713018,0.000009156022,0.00043787525,0.05668259,0.0004261704,0.0031047103,0.0061678654,0.9254491,0.00007884577],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011380256,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.038620047,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99827945,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0073841866,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018354433,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.112115204},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400482714","doi":"10.55016/ojs/cpai.v4i2.74222","title":"Clues to Fostering a Program Culture of Academic Integrity: Findings from a Multidimensional Model","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Perspectives on Academic Integrity","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Cognitive science; Engineering ethics; Engineering","score_opus":0.05673803079130072,"score_gpt":0.35941001893940344,"score_spread":0.3026719881481027,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400482714","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99245316,0.000110586225,0.0010876087,0.0013600503,0.0000068881013,0.00008766606,0.00005537282,0.000010918372,0.00482777],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988864,0.00008137579,0.00073354354,0.00005401068,0.0000022684676,0.000024155393,0.00003968614,0.0000037101481,0.0001747603],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99080044,0.0044503408,0.00044626638,0.00083648576,0.0023502975,0.0011161396],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9703314,0.011141742,0.0071174456,0.0027311668,0.0045055766,0.004172682],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011090126,0.00068070483,0.0005176377,0.004057231,0.006859232,0.009086377,0.0020255616,0.0009337469,0.0028373392],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030551953,0.00059383153,0.0009775283,0.003899182,0.006956535,0.0032800292,0.008697744,0.0024663447,0.00013627666],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000058296806,0.00030661668,0.8778824,0.00009682821,0.00010682435,0.00014589327,0.09621129,0.00039480938,0.0002483139,0.0071025747,0.0003559009,0.017090205],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016334421,0.00014942414,0.846823,0.00018329684,0.00010912188,0.0001588394,0.1374952,0.006675162,0.00021875085,0.0056072283,0.0024940795,0.00006962653],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.26465374,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.32106856,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99906623,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017325828,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.025733283,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5262266},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400482717","doi":"10.55016/ojs/cpai.v4i2.74170","title":"Moving the Spotlight from Plagiarism to Academic Integrity in Paraphrasing Instruction","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Perspectives on Academic Integrity","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Mount Royal University","funders":"","keywords":"Academic integrity; Academic dishonesty; Research integrity; Psychology; Mathematics education; Cheating; Engineering ethics; Engineering; Social psychology","score_opus":0.03052056251866167,"score_gpt":0.31748286873641707,"score_spread":0.2869623062177554,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400482717","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19159566,0.017073391,0.21472925,0.15926191,0.0053128297,0.0010213725,0.00014848167,0.010744648,0.40011245],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6956033,0.011001519,0.18452059,0.027757987,0.0023316327,0.0007783057,0.00018308412,0.0026201543,0.07520349],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9912621,0.0046077124,0.00041707463,0.00071334245,0.0022706608,0.00072903145],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.989726,0.0057425364,0.00085645256,0.0010866234,0.0013804521,0.0012079598],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0065384256,0.0009262172,0.0006192777,0.0012770437,0.0035618593,0.008245872,0.002335387,0.005605322,0.01363962],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01905148,0.0006804928,0.0005682855,0.0006216872,0.0061477455,0.008831187,0.009927463,0.010802529,0.0068520415],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002876736,0.001092125,0.0024953827,0.0015571694,0.000024871242,0.0010255269,0.105640486,0.00053669675,0.035575736,0.071337,0.08145103,0.69897634],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015100041,0.0016991274,0.008629054,0.0036673513,0.00008837292,0.0055458457,0.04630056,0.0032996011,0.04158291,0.08521486,0.80354816,0.0002730827],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00086385227,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021861359,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99439466,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021031077,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003564424,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.045629084},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"domain":"methods","study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":true,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"domain":"methods","study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"commentary","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W4400482721","doi":"10.55016/ojs/cpai.v1i1.43395","title":"Launching an Institutional Academic Integrity Campaign","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Perspectives on Academic Integrity","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Academic integrity; Research integrity; Political science; Business; Public relations; Engineering ethics; Engineering","score_opus":0.05092638258941645,"score_gpt":0.3546960670525394,"score_spread":0.30376968446312297,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400482721","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13403007,0.0037916268,0.0027011477,0.65744275,0.0048644077,0.000435669,0.00014445686,0.00035770706,0.19623218],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7348761,0.004488918,0.00592787,0.14614232,0.001953342,0.00022118418,0.00023507174,0.00020350613,0.105951674],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98557067,0.004944616,0.00027095556,0.00051533687,0.0046248105,0.004073576],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9273729,0.011260934,0.00298697,0.0025083278,0.021533335,0.034337584],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020226251,0.0003554732,0.0004568523,0.0020166554,0.027427226,0.012559749,0.0020805527,0.006424759,0.010880346],"category_scores_gemma":[0.034847386,0.00039318518,0.00041903966,0.0019038073,0.010881332,0.0040877163,0.009858463,0.011235509,0.0020675922],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002001936,0.0011833627,0.05528798,0.00083309965,0.00009314817,0.0016802486,0.1737797,0.00035002324,0.0070840553,0.12701517,0.44588432,0.18660873],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004568514,0.00027503492,0.028854914,0.0005319487,0.000030353878,0.00014618436,0.06614261,0.0002060952,0.0022714904,0.0036574684,0.89774066,0.0000975898],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.39013743,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6394903,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9935752,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02790102,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13018744,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7757332},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400482730","doi":"10.55016/ojs/cpai.v5i2.76959","title":"From the History of Contract Cheating to the New Challenges of Artificial Intelligence: The Changing Landscape of Academic Integrity","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Perspectives on Academic Integrity","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Cheating; Academic integrity; Business; Computer science; Engineering ethics; Artificial intelligence; Psychology; Engineering; Social psychology","score_opus":0.07485073162746717,"score_gpt":0.3328561691519013,"score_spread":0.25800543752443417,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400482730","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0056565334,0.079782575,0.0016355403,0.75683767,0.009543353,0.000019630636,0.00016249594,0.00006224554,0.14629987],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.48953158,0.1983141,0.0022177503,0.17726341,0.021465134,0.000058353315,0.00024983194,0.00049368414,0.11040622],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97957134,0.004435091,0.00047278567,0.0011080666,0.010523034,0.0038896485],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9530472,0.018255547,0.002460809,0.0025715772,0.016590223,0.0070746546],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01316892,0.0004303064,0.0008104549,0.004775052,0.033945873,0.030928206,0.0035131122,0.011418027,0.010993629],"category_scores_gemma":[0.036915746,0.0005343701,0.0005180923,0.008627559,0.07676411,0.017148452,0.0078093647,0.020543087,0.0012066064],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020366942,0.00001539778,0.0006217008,0.0001953917,0.000010229048,0.0002988736,0.03604815,0.0001361243,0.00008517159,0.64287156,0.2833789,0.036318082],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000031941154,0.000005626393,0.00063780503,0.0004532013,0.000004942239,0.00012029115,0.012309788,0.000055930555,0.00007869027,0.033628274,0.95266396,0.000038267754],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7414778,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8157578,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7414778,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.100246005,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1267301,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7273391},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400482731","doi":"10.55016/ojs/cpai.v6i1.76899","title":"Quizzing Students about their Writing: Implications for Deterring and Detecting Contract Cheating, and Promoting Academic Integrity and Greater Engagement","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Perspectives on Academic Integrity","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Academic integrity; Cheating; Psychology; Mathematics education; Social psychology","score_opus":0.07831509208071864,"score_gpt":0.38012451850568163,"score_spread":0.301809426424963,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400482731","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89451534,0.0017301042,0.010394455,0.04715938,0.00027203996,0.0007955046,0.00027077942,0.0005762014,0.04428617],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9894629,0.0005266795,0.0065411907,0.001202184,0.00004790537,0.00019977729,0.000053195123,0.000027235277,0.0019388995],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9565571,0.027719785,0.0025097094,0.001556197,0.009779792,0.0018774254],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.70285875,0.18827805,0.04852063,0.011148873,0.030138634,0.019055102],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0510624,0.00056041,0.0006927133,0.002666716,0.005168967,0.0075281854,0.0015948252,0.0011255328,0.0054871687],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2247974,0.00033696485,0.00061494624,0.0030024496,0.0048738956,0.0047623836,0.0027864275,0.0023080737,0.0008324661],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007579126,0.0020368916,0.4454126,0.0009656706,0.00011811282,0.0004502958,0.0399046,0.0008161666,0.002208417,0.00772092,0.011168938,0.48843953],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022129866,0.0018708374,0.89605933,0.0013625555,0.00016453504,0.00048204686,0.043398023,0.0052149966,0.004325875,0.01778903,0.02886126,0.00025035228],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.028454883,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.061027132,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0510624,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0061319545,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.023654597,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.270047},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400482738","doi":"10.55016/ojs/cpai.v6i1.76948","title":"Are University Students Armed with the Necessary Skill Level to Prevent Plagiarism?","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Perspectives on Academic Integrity","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec en Outaouais","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematics education; Psychology; Medical education; Medicine","score_opus":0.04125645674548666,"score_gpt":0.32116264970477065,"score_spread":0.279906192959284,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400482738","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9551208,0.0006468432,0.0008239432,0.021086473,0.000078799814,0.000034080436,0.000095469164,0.000051143965,0.022062458],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974711,0.0002490235,0.00020049597,0.00089418475,0.000019600948,0.0000073203723,0.00002384247,0.0000045088927,0.0011299022],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9917898,0.0016146114,0.00032894325,0.0003730351,0.0032731667,0.0026204456],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96267784,0.0048334883,0.012152042,0.0019612007,0.008568899,0.009806571],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0054462906,0.00016273688,0.00043744073,0.0017503893,0.00467671,0.005967494,0.0010434381,0.0017327443,0.0052038208],"category_scores_gemma":[0.044807814,0.00024023412,0.00027548286,0.0021287065,0.005588677,0.0028743055,0.0019110615,0.0017131445,0.0011949714],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011365537,0.00040966066,0.61152077,0.00021172006,0.000041100444,0.00084773684,0.16290414,0.00014036827,0.0024311868,0.0064365445,0.011955353,0.20298775],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017272014,0.00020702665,0.7129422,0.00020130802,0.000024166995,0.00077809946,0.24856043,0.00022342856,0.0012894516,0.0039233714,0.03174619,0.00008714098],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06266486,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.075726226,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06266486,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0050764116,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01401545,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12460023},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["research_integrity"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":true,"confidence":"high"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"domain":"methods","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":true,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W4400482741","doi":"10.55016/ojs/cpai.v6i1.76905","title":"Coordinating for Academic Integrity at the Program Level","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Perspectives on Academic Integrity","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Academic integrity; Computer science; Library science","score_opus":0.11099143075142212,"score_gpt":0.3964862108797905,"score_spread":0.2854947801283684,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400482741","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.067401126,0.0019769545,0.042177413,0.39656848,0.0015953631,0.0016312473,0.00022337827,0.00087801815,0.48754796],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.859019,0.0022481035,0.03404272,0.0200359,0.00046074318,0.000597339,0.00017549052,0.00031771287,0.08310308],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.92791617,0.03012824,0.0022840886,0.004222893,0.018721119,0.016727427],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8597129,0.01837951,0.009860172,0.010623257,0.050013833,0.05141036],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.050849445,0.0005311255,0.0007236997,0.004553554,0.04794455,0.020501373,0.005901055,0.005469721,0.013687129],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08925233,0.0006507256,0.00084055006,0.0057092384,0.020115502,0.012324138,0.021760253,0.0122551955,0.0024198464],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000072087896,0.00038449024,0.021053912,0.00056968577,0.00006427793,0.000828251,0.23893543,0.0010248205,0.0014991409,0.36444685,0.14163864,0.22948243],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000031126187,0.0001666868,0.022565152,0.0011531131,0.00005189467,0.00047253454,0.18150549,0.0010153998,0.0017950136,0.07271593,0.7183717,0.0001560615],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.41447526,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.54373676,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.41447526,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.071570724,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.34318566,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8241255},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400482745","doi":"10.55016/ojs/cpai.v5i2.73748","title":"Academic Integrity and Student Mental Well-Being: A Rapid Review","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Canadian Perspectives on Academic Integrity","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Academic integrity; Psychology; Engineering ethics; Social psychology; Engineering","score_opus":0.08275510638096632,"score_gpt":0.41058884856333855,"score_spread":0.3278337421823722,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400482745","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00011896066,0.9987865,0.00005599249,0.0004989657,0.00016262196,0.000036338573,0.00005780708,0.0000035062683,0.0002793882],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0012079565,0.9980724,0.0001655813,0.00032205202,0.00006986817,0.000041333667,0.000038383707,0.0000018561103,0.000080612954],"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","domain_scores_codex":[0.9955753,0.0011927554,0.0013199779,0.0003615758,0.0013582376,0.00019219957],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9517869,0.03423415,0.004586201,0.0006885659,0.008012907,0.00069119263],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009165348,0.00096687407,0.0032609846,0.011493416,0.0010236952,0.0034985975,0.0018791034,0.00243632,0.005317398],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03807014,0.0008906476,0.0028522452,0.01348389,0.0011314038,0.0032438997,0.0018384238,0.0021232206,0.00079676445],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":"systematic_review","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011233324,0.000037800717,0.0007869936,0.61278975,0.0013812206,0.00020362936,0.00068201724,0.00012821252,0.00025350045,0.001892664,0.021062395,0.36066952],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027795548,0.000110798916,0.003560004,0.735549,0.0050778748,0.00062059687,0.0006812723,0.00007229156,0.00014488547,0.0009446233,0.25316152,0.000049453625],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015174447,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.054496754,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015174447,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004493068,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.021577237,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04847157},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400482748","doi":"10.55016/ojs/cpai.v6i1.76882","title":"A Rapid Scoping Review on Academic Integrity and Algorithmic Writing Technologies","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Perspectives on Academic Integrity","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Academic integrity; Computer science; Engineering ethics; Data science; Engineering","score_opus":0.0629576065305041,"score_gpt":0.36789155457062495,"score_spread":0.30493394804012086,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400482748","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005205762,0.5317928,0.1061546,0.10880455,0.029809838,0.1593567,0.01209561,0.0017378401,0.04504232],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.020379286,0.47779334,0.27929333,0.019535368,0.0037920144,0.18359613,0.006018578,0.00068533764,0.008906571],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","domain_scores_codex":[0.7869767,0.10493103,0.05438027,0.006306383,0.04463974,0.0027658388],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.4713423,0.29677922,0.03577578,0.024311572,0.16755588,0.004235259],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.23522139,0.0022147493,0.005145486,0.03905885,0.0057324744,0.015345377,0.004675827,0.007725443,0.014915846],"category_scores_gemma":[0.48195884,0.002870109,0.00818186,0.02955214,0.004190909,0.01571083,0.0128852,0.008014632,0.004863236],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00031010015,0.00009045918,0.00077937974,0.39483288,0.00096950855,0.00077523297,0.011702209,0.0008272611,0.0022353062,0.025772939,0.14567156,0.41603315],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013474106,0.00012709996,0.00074504357,0.5953274,0.0011558657,0.00033001666,0.0032567189,0.00028318443,0.0006615763,0.008670465,0.3891869,0.00012107311],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008167385,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024013026,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23522139,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017185565,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.114785686,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9431082},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400482750","doi":"10.55016/ojs/cpai.v6i1.76917","title":"Academic Integrity in Canada: An Enduring and Essential Challenge","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Perspectives on Academic Integrity","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary; Yorkville University","funders":"","keywords":"Academic integrity; Political science; Engineering ethics; Environmental ethics; Engineering; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04105693096597994,"score_gpt":0.3217692203451567,"score_spread":0.28071228937917675,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400482750","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0030746101,0.013400171,0.0007695488,0.9536484,0.004637903,0.000028628852,0.00010652866,0.000067545596,0.024266645],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.34873933,0.07596449,0.009106701,0.47433195,0.00608657,0.00014135904,0.0005310763,0.00045296838,0.08464552],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9450211,0.008426146,0.0013481769,0.0029198455,0.024926515,0.017358273],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8825714,0.013215019,0.0026471557,0.0022267234,0.050054405,0.0492852],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.024624607,0.0009470432,0.0016027602,0.003162646,0.077202156,0.032203864,0.0067064487,0.015298191,0.012789663],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0446166,0.0008793397,0.0010825957,0.006018368,0.041048788,0.011923917,0.017193936,0.03211987,0.002108333],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000048126974,0.0000496509,0.002599263,0.00039651216,0.000044636337,0.00097452936,0.029784111,0.000345473,0.0003939611,0.14824979,0.7424978,0.07461607],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016586548,0.000026067166,0.0029025169,0.000751436,0.000022532546,0.00039804415,0.054954823,0.00026329167,0.00024509156,0.021581857,0.9186607,0.00017706378],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98586845,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99278295,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.73029387,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.26970613,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.607933,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8470374},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400482751","doi":"10.55016/ojs/cpai.v4i2.74230","title":"Applied Authentic Assessment in Engineering Technology Courses for Academic Integrity","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Perspectives on Academic Integrity","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"SAIT Polytechnic","funders":"","keywords":"Academic integrity; Engineering ethics; Engineering; Structural integrity; Research integrity; Engineering management; Computer science","score_opus":0.02517110391105338,"score_gpt":0.3360429306650447,"score_spread":0.31087182675399133,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400482751","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1639429,0.004113334,0.18535294,0.06981593,0.0018264825,0.002615996,0.00014825503,0.0008934453,0.5712908],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8806684,0.0015445629,0.07877791,0.0018372593,0.00009707947,0.00039292878,0.000051775565,0.00014745997,0.036482666],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9471838,0.03460921,0.0020179767,0.0015464324,0.01219422,0.0024484443],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.92688054,0.022898948,0.0055148294,0.0070791077,0.029806916,0.007819628],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03665298,0.0005225271,0.00044162048,0.002808967,0.015418311,0.01479996,0.0026340077,0.0024712582,0.00844732],"category_scores_gemma":[0.10056784,0.0003926503,0.00040463073,0.0024382237,0.015353629,0.0061335242,0.013370338,0.0058827414,0.0014883059],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007896071,0.00052145065,0.014050431,0.00074893184,0.000017465723,0.0005561482,0.16661914,0.0020105524,0.0023531613,0.35231036,0.029518034,0.43121535],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000034882276,0.00040322752,0.01837163,0.002598494,0.000024120116,0.0007123048,0.12381437,0.005139107,0.0074138977,0.12584844,0.7154213,0.00021821809],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09133618,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15034801,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09133618,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.023524478,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0691008,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19384181},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400482752","doi":"10.55016/ojs/cpai.v6i1.76921","title":"So it Happened… What Now?","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Perspectives on Academic Integrity","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"History; Computer science","score_opus":0.0409788105937908,"score_gpt":0.3380341513165658,"score_spread":0.29705534072277495,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400482752","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.045157682,0.0057138987,0.0035566182,0.8179134,0.00712809,0.000090137415,0.00015469456,0.000120775345,0.120164655],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6264266,0.014753598,0.006712751,0.17105837,0.0015155604,0.00009840496,0.000294637,0.00022145572,0.17891869],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9891796,0.0047185845,0.00022791854,0.00059471984,0.002802989,0.0024761865],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9813607,0.0032717367,0.002140017,0.00071487366,0.0054155835,0.0070970803],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010281734,0.000548155,0.0005626547,0.0011899173,0.03174716,0.013084275,0.0024933596,0.005959303,0.014783325],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023856884,0.000359018,0.00070656516,0.0017135337,0.023184672,0.008095315,0.0070265583,0.014881653,0.0037097177],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000059161735,0.0002066072,0.022567129,0.00040021996,0.00003566761,0.0028801605,0.4388175,0.00018765929,0.0013879394,0.116950065,0.31432322,0.10218474],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000810891,0.00006581997,0.006591838,0.00060072594,0.000020482164,0.0015503656,0.34656718,0.00013686946,0.0007065571,0.017051633,0.6266079,0.00009248138],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.36651254,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5776424,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.36651254,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.031797003,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05696546,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7287584},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400482754","doi":"10.55016/ojs/cpai.v4i2.74231","title":"Integrating Academic Integrity into Future Professions","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Perspectives on Academic Integrity","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Georgian College","funders":"","keywords":"Academic integrity; Research integrity; Engineering ethics; Computer science; Psychology; Engineering","score_opus":0.03150691308151877,"score_gpt":0.34981331647311104,"score_spread":0.3183064033915923,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400482754","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.024083653,0.0045687817,0.031008411,0.36029288,0.0037813894,0.00017946668,0.0000359123,0.00041067717,0.5756388],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.84248644,0.003855416,0.014929007,0.038408212,0.0012534772,0.000115107105,0.00003758325,0.0003138173,0.09860091],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9613461,0.015830405,0.00089203863,0.0013745399,0.015372972,0.005183877],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93697095,0.012557004,0.004455191,0.005590487,0.023722969,0.016703453],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.028447812,0.0005320982,0.0006202275,0.0016976051,0.03793321,0.019809911,0.002501505,0.008381186,0.011873719],"category_scores_gemma":[0.054784305,0.00043366605,0.0007789692,0.0012001415,0.053175468,0.015972733,0.022502461,0.020039847,0.0032178038],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002830715,0.00007788503,0.0018113819,0.0002007334,0.000013258251,0.0005323668,0.15744245,0.000528053,0.00097504637,0.7165451,0.047490377,0.07435506],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008561109,0.00007642946,0.0017965378,0.0006679498,0.000009804498,0.00057448243,0.04741144,0.0003787047,0.00088191224,0.11723172,0.830874,0.0000884847],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.085863076,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1212877,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.085863076,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03225327,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.084542975,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23401493},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400482757","doi":"10.55016/ojs/cpai.v4i1.72851","title":"An aggie's approach to restorative academic integrity practices","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Perspectives on Academic Integrity","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Academic integrity; Restorative justice; Psychology; Engineering ethics; Criminology; Engineering","score_opus":0.08203820528050869,"score_gpt":0.39235398065477706,"score_spread":0.31031577537426835,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400482757","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017106982,0.0049525397,0.061780836,0.12573843,0.0018181218,0.00040816198,0.00015327476,0.0002537678,0.787788],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5916546,0.010340458,0.08409129,0.025736306,0.00058201945,0.00065609673,0.00007457519,0.00023275771,0.28663185],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99424225,0.0028334183,0.00021109436,0.00041010082,0.0015054665,0.0007976493],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958497,0.0017856301,0.00037384554,0.00033618786,0.0012214939,0.00043309908],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0054435823,0.00095849263,0.00044475438,0.006419462,0.022236126,0.011842185,0.0030023241,0.0042429087,0.00565467],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0066913706,0.00038176912,0.0008654869,0.002910444,0.045589253,0.004825401,0.006720471,0.009132521,0.00068763515],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006393975,0.000027319895,0.0006106459,0.000105610765,0.000007673823,0.00021150969,0.041131508,0.00025800386,0.00017916628,0.9307995,0.0106145935,0.016048182],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006118591,0.000046349494,0.0023022795,0.0005928182,0.000025812611,0.0007100141,0.07685921,0.0006687462,0.0005139817,0.24607302,0.67215264,0.000049062182],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.26137748,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5270157,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26137748,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.028346134,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.033676837,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5197122},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400482762","doi":"10.55016/ojs/cpai.v4i1.70974","title":"Punished but not prepared: An exploration of novice writers' experiences of plagiarism at university","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Perspectives on Academic Integrity","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Regina; University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.04533344710183668,"score_gpt":0.309886515686752,"score_spread":0.26455306858491534,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400482762","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99753857,0.0001733208,0.00019604807,0.00030992948,0.000012973696,0.000015488673,0.000010246139,0.000010822101,0.0017325999],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985499,0.00014426558,0.0001818946,0.00012992803,0.000007666458,0.0000069677667,0.000013042652,0.000009708815,0.00095656206],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98940897,0.0051075807,0.0004622159,0.0004915103,0.002918678,0.0016109481],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96328694,0.018224027,0.0066344147,0.0015617469,0.0046713897,0.00562138],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008626898,0.00065864343,0.0008951272,0.0019395356,0.016171169,0.007636545,0.0021764713,0.002086702,0.0012446649],"category_scores_gemma":[0.046111796,0.000606784,0.00045150126,0.0014241264,0.008980713,0.0026835597,0.005420551,0.00470558,0.00023001144],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000051255367,0.00006702624,0.01244409,0.000043511358,0.0000060703806,0.0006748091,0.98077947,0.000030043644,0.0007623809,0.0002626835,0.00024147342,0.0046371548],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000074491886,0.0001732759,0.02298282,0.000062002415,0.000010940829,0.000912293,0.97000825,0.00012891639,0.00063747255,0.00016091406,0.004870962,0.00004473467],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08022354,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.18510807,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08022354,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009657137,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010299576,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15951318},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["research_integrity"],"domain":null,"study_design":"qualitative","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":true,"confidence":"high"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["research_integrity"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":true,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W4400482766","doi":"10.55016/ojs/cpai.v6i1.76504","title":"Did the Student Engage in Academic Dishonesty on their Exam? Yes, No, and Shades of Grey in Decision Making","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Perspectives on Academic Integrity","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Academic dishonesty; Psychology; Making-of; Mathematics education; Medical education; Social psychology; Cheating; Management; Medicine; Economics","score_opus":0.047473432242160905,"score_gpt":0.3661299872196753,"score_spread":0.31865655497751444,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400482766","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97829217,0.00048668453,0.0033561874,0.006386113,0.0001018615,0.00006889836,0.000024747813,0.000021068654,0.011262209],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973149,0.00022281629,0.0013750807,0.00048168472,0.000017352791,0.00002482219,0.000010676195,0.000004689185,0.00054791145],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9627103,0.031067688,0.0011002141,0.001311672,0.002409952,0.0014002054],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95244956,0.03269868,0.007960191,0.0015124455,0.0020144584,0.0033646317],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019989373,0.0005189946,0.00037511965,0.0008732753,0.0043402836,0.0052016685,0.0008991101,0.0031645512,0.001957531],"category_scores_gemma":[0.064649455,0.000490203,0.0005796653,0.00053566054,0.010896513,0.0036026768,0.0041483254,0.0036558302,0.00042373934],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00066943135,0.00036603588,0.14140289,0.0005355722,0.00013640591,0.0026684692,0.77889305,0.0010002622,0.006976553,0.015395115,0.0034281015,0.048528068],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007479934,0.0005127023,0.067415014,0.0007738447,0.00008126325,0.0015418298,0.87500364,0.0023664117,0.0024318602,0.023627698,0.025912631,0.0002583977],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003559291,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006554772,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019989373,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021987162,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015089063,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.105715156},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400482784","doi":"10.55016/ojs/cpai.v5i2.75649","title":"Cheating: It depends how you define it","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Perspectives on Academic Integrity","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Durham College","funders":"","keywords":"Cheating; Information technology; Computer science; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.0571260874846967,"score_gpt":0.33899748069710745,"score_spread":0.2818713932124107,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400482784","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08536517,0.019913983,0.025450572,0.61147296,0.0076760235,0.00021602256,0.00032921007,0.00033552616,0.24924059],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88251185,0.008486671,0.007417001,0.066995226,0.0010207114,0.00009215925,0.00015437008,0.00038762085,0.03293439],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9745042,0.010147986,0.001149394,0.0013250094,0.008806942,0.0040664845],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94779974,0.0089880135,0.005488172,0.004097715,0.024878763,0.0087475665],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015007069,0.0007654334,0.0009171099,0.0021714785,0.016201898,0.016307373,0.0019208915,0.0052489555,0.0048562465],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05108193,0.00033985634,0.0006115565,0.002358957,0.05221188,0.01250172,0.005950621,0.012454948,0.0018659249],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000074083284,0.00009796402,0.026705159,0.00036041578,0.00007817981,0.0004550585,0.41493127,0.00027296858,0.0019049629,0.31520212,0.15693682,0.08298102],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013485882,0.00007683045,0.020818058,0.0014762186,0.00004148417,0.0009759228,0.27467948,0.00034431956,0.0007479781,0.0712068,0.62932944,0.00028994252],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.31980518,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.24486609,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31980518,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018502263,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.026828082,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6358874},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400482785","doi":"10.55016/ojs/cpai.v6i1.76901","title":"Academic Integrity Policy Analysis of Alberta and Manitoba Colleges","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Perspectives on Academic Integrity","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba; Assiniboine Community College; Red River College; University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Academic integrity; Research integrity; Political science; Public administration; Engineering ethics; Engineering; Public relations","score_opus":0.03541694004209835,"score_gpt":0.3395192714366516,"score_spread":0.3041023313945533,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400482785","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9323172,0.0020300937,0.0013828716,0.006720523,0.00008183486,0.0009945057,0.008144305,0.00011647951,0.04821213],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9604133,0.0025705518,0.0048719086,0.0020456468,0.00003619464,0.0006253548,0.0060274727,0.000078179015,0.023331407],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98090315,0.0019600338,0.0010733164,0.0013669634,0.009733666,0.0049627796],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.91202134,0.01866257,0.007486644,0.0022090864,0.052763857,0.006856536],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013030189,0.00047649155,0.00086746505,0.022010678,0.017372977,0.0071886443,0.0034626515,0.0013727171,0.0035955838],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03853619,0.0007515717,0.00066232897,0.049205557,0.004844513,0.0012107204,0.0036792867,0.0018387678,0.00043749722],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00039471037,0.00029319015,0.73569137,0.0011592092,0.00017853998,0.0020763716,0.11645225,0.0045942217,0.002345547,0.027516708,0.024524836,0.08477307],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020008007,0.00005513519,0.7824381,0.00049937866,0.00008725796,0.00021846042,0.15486142,0.0021109402,0.0014233784,0.0011923185,0.056977592,0.0001160571],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99668175,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99700975,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7427901,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.25720987,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.35616052,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.86153126},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400482786","doi":"10.55016/ojs/cpai.v4i1.72845","title":"You've got this! The fundamental values of academic integrity","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Perspectives on Academic Integrity","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Red River College","funders":"","keywords":"Academic integrity; Engineering ethics; Epistemology; Psychology; Political science; Philosophy; Engineering","score_opus":0.03969932670074498,"score_gpt":0.33508614149305693,"score_spread":0.29538681479231194,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400482786","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01405091,0.0048988503,0.0056712613,0.65724957,0.0041355127,0.00006398318,0.00013657895,0.00029790844,0.31349534],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6657339,0.008335247,0.0067698928,0.065788485,0.0016162904,0.000093902214,0.00015962812,0.0004165992,0.25108603],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9745821,0.009841784,0.0005846326,0.00086528226,0.009882362,0.004243887],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9615989,0.0051681385,0.0027482195,0.0035810396,0.012685874,0.014217858],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011175796,0.0005151898,0.0007563561,0.0016472318,0.036881678,0.027237752,0.0018827494,0.0058619557,0.018622778],"category_scores_gemma":[0.035003733,0.00038951993,0.0005076419,0.002099908,0.051096767,0.014900629,0.0117030265,0.014727805,0.0064917863],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000051808423,0.00006798545,0.0028942835,0.0002121307,0.00001911306,0.0005412315,0.19825132,0.00013840853,0.00085449265,0.3825751,0.34486103,0.06953312],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005801877,0.00002534748,0.0017816265,0.00026773845,0.0000071478876,0.00040828955,0.07299385,0.00006345424,0.000388061,0.038030762,0.88596797,0.000060016504],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.174836,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1838795,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.174836,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.021256348,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.044758633,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34763664},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400482789","doi":"10.55016/ojs/cpai.v4i1.72848","title":"Nursing student knowledge of plagiarism and its relationship to writing apprehension and writing self-efficacy","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Perspectives on Academic Integrity","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Red River College","funders":"","keywords":"Apprehension; Psychology; Self-efficacy; Communication apprehension; Nursing; Medical education; Pedagogy; Medicine; Social psychology; Anxiety","score_opus":0.045797995634867396,"score_gpt":0.36985548880929525,"score_spread":0.32405749317442784,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400482789","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9976127,0.00011029871,0.0000386022,0.00020239227,0.000006209834,0.000021580645,0.000043803182,0.0000037965385,0.0019605376],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99804354,0.00027568135,0.00010622251,0.000049585673,0.00000868081,0.000028475934,0.00007114128,0.0000022954262,0.0014142675],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99711144,0.00051936944,0.00039635328,0.00017003251,0.0013877258,0.00041505392],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9545064,0.016709011,0.013848525,0.0010804307,0.007931199,0.0059243073],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0040479447,0.00019161848,0.00061197573,0.0027467678,0.0021361795,0.0025931578,0.0006338291,0.00065427896,0.0047696168],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031328127,0.00035105253,0.00060368347,0.0012756493,0.001063565,0.0010906024,0.0014841252,0.0020201537,0.0006387761],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000061915984,0.00075279456,0.97011864,0.00005434579,0.00003441644,0.00009036644,0.01651267,0.00003480456,0.0002495726,0.00008193684,0.0002688841,0.011739689],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000029218315,0.00025838736,0.9778357,0.000057967005,0.000018118539,0.000116126605,0.020598464,0.000102983475,0.00025540558,0.0000903239,0.0006435074,0.000020142823],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017231872,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.037143476,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017231872,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020190189,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036110205,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.034263134},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["research_integrity"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["research_integrity"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W4400482792","doi":"10.55016/ojs/cpai.v5i1.75015","title":"Where there's smoke: The library's role in bibliographic analysis of academic misconduct","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Perspectives on Academic Integrity","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Assiniboine Community College","funders":"","keywords":"Misconduct; Academic library; Smoke; Political science; Library science; Computer science; Law; Geography; Meteorology","score_opus":0.02736664402970878,"score_gpt":0.3032791585444949,"score_spread":0.2759125145147861,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400482792","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.109054305,0.016706625,0.031069906,0.52636486,0.0019517724,0.00056653423,0.00053606014,0.0023077636,0.31144226],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8721196,0.013351753,0.042920217,0.023052571,0.0010260405,0.00033073666,0.00034486147,0.0009810755,0.045873154],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.8914113,0.07081652,0.005623143,0.0025499335,0.024106689,0.005492416],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6909435,0.1896979,0.018085012,0.023429684,0.06414379,0.013700106],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.12153818,0.00047803496,0.0011045656,0.027241763,0.047155555,0.054900773,0.005641411,0.003974893,0.009374262],"category_scores_gemma":[0.22948533,0.00075894524,0.000578862,0.038385164,0.030195571,0.02892042,0.02379603,0.004925686,0.0028136307],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000081688595,0.000095908064,0.018873956,0.00070786156,0.00004361185,0.00074563007,0.40156338,0.00015303543,0.00054347253,0.08001892,0.06892067,0.42825186],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016795631,0.000046813155,0.013047079,0.002116082,0.00007795012,0.00069647474,0.6299304,0.0007025574,0.0015533156,0.04630387,0.3053097,0.00019899393],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2933388,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4520678,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97275823,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05282194,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.15840402,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.642763},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400482795","doi":"10.55016/ojs/cpai.v6i1.76577","title":"Practitioner's Approach to Academic Integrity through the Lens of Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Perspectives on Academic Integrity","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Equity (law); Inclusion (mineral); Diversity (politics); Academic integrity; Through-the-lens metering; Lens (geology); Psychology; Political science; Social psychology; Optics; Law; Physics","score_opus":0.09928065639629577,"score_gpt":0.3670065391592573,"score_spread":0.2677258827629615,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400482795","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01751375,0.026752053,0.047464058,0.6943616,0.0066966396,0.0002935059,0.00006940278,0.00022009133,0.20662884],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8045129,0.03215462,0.048959304,0.057988513,0.0022053628,0.00056684355,0.000054321757,0.00019683185,0.053361323],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9496355,0.034550905,0.0011034994,0.0019197188,0.008617765,0.004172548],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9535993,0.025702123,0.0019413844,0.0023601095,0.009523727,0.006873379],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04241417,0.0012053945,0.0013298019,0.0060970793,0.04124211,0.028885229,0.0060518747,0.014227627,0.0059206486],"category_scores_gemma":[0.036224324,0.00059356785,0.0011094332,0.005800929,0.08285693,0.013900653,0.017321404,0.030700555,0.0009294261],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016710275,0.000035966576,0.00047048216,0.00041527307,0.0000100316975,0.0007224173,0.33404383,0.00026525542,0.00028411733,0.6207248,0.020388186,0.022622913],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000119490005,0.000042910593,0.000499098,0.0015834785,0.000015712449,0.0009738104,0.32596907,0.00040216904,0.00027789545,0.19168912,0.47847778,0.000057040845],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.22943968,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2761914,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22943968,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.059054155,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14149058,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.45620835},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400482796","doi":"10.55016/ojs/cpai.v6i1.76931","title":"It Takes a Village","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Perspectives on Academic Integrity","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary; NorQuest College","funders":"","keywords":"Geography; Computer science","score_opus":0.04349498198648784,"score_gpt":0.3385096055275277,"score_spread":0.29501462354103986,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400482796","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07600694,0.0032969404,0.0050047575,0.21329468,0.010184304,0.00026709776,0.0005447552,0.0006153231,0.6907851],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.44114715,0.0016839763,0.0023271206,0.045751546,0.00052151637,0.00011176423,0.00030107252,0.00028890974,0.507867],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982437,0.00048048023,0.00002645662,0.00025897997,0.00038828384,0.0006021356],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979836,0.000118778,0.00006879715,0.00011602098,0.00028313012,0.0014296591],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011306055,0.00039780216,0.00042162152,0.00045144508,0.025814286,0.010105715,0.0015250056,0.0028846639,0.053785954],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002050849,0.00034201014,0.0002462751,0.0005816366,0.009721537,0.0058506955,0.0078041567,0.0061520445,0.008543034],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013432658,0.0001536163,0.005364132,0.00023880873,0.000029810906,0.004469532,0.14370404,0.00022058285,0.0022574267,0.20231695,0.5689282,0.07218261],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008062326,0.000029912266,0.0014956177,0.000113778086,0.0000045079782,0.0003476767,0.08647704,0.000056147797,0.00011089426,0.0082550105,0.9030786,0.000022652575],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.14678149,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.30491444,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14678149,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007637015,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012254463,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29185426},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400482797","doi":"10.55016/ojs/cpai.v4i1.72822","title":"Academic integrity at ICM: Successes, challenges and opportunities","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Perspectives on Academic Integrity","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Academic integrity; Engineering ethics; Research integrity; Political science; Engineering","score_opus":0.10068869688111311,"score_gpt":0.3350384743737042,"score_spread":0.23434977749259112,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400482797","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4644698,0.0044872384,0.0022349246,0.44156745,0.002098973,0.00039992834,0.0004177346,0.0002499242,0.08407401],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9277577,0.003829373,0.003291064,0.018356299,0.0006638587,0.00017188741,0.00017134633,0.00018917302,0.045569398],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.95768696,0.015749546,0.0012766186,0.0016084117,0.015110531,0.008567883],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.76273817,0.04334946,0.0186332,0.009193492,0.06991768,0.09616799],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.052630343,0.00043290397,0.0007882501,0.0049518635,0.0669923,0.025877854,0.0037449563,0.0058986023,0.010987699],"category_scores_gemma":[0.13642573,0.0006463231,0.0004963431,0.0072809495,0.016756594,0.008597698,0.016514316,0.011323807,0.0022811703],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015699533,0.0005703441,0.15089013,0.00065896,0.000052062547,0.0049683456,0.54988235,0.00026855417,0.002039288,0.036652997,0.09966742,0.15419261],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011103062,0.00023910485,0.060790647,0.00091905263,0.00002321825,0.0009220696,0.6412154,0.00040772255,0.0017355148,0.0055139842,0.28802687,0.00019539638],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.30276066,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6108695,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.30276066,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.043915827,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13217805,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6019968},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400482799","doi":"10.55016/ojs/cpai.v6i1.76897","title":"It's Not Robotic: Barriers to Navigating Academic Integrity &amp; the Role of Emotions","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Perspectives on Academic Integrity","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Conestoga College","funders":"","keywords":"Academic integrity; Psychology; Structural integrity; Engineering ethics; Cognitive science; Social psychology; Engineering","score_opus":0.04067528203526819,"score_gpt":0.34942538724000033,"score_spread":0.3087501052047321,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400482799","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8604223,0.004088695,0.003367245,0.09824179,0.0007292409,0.000066323424,0.00008973131,0.00013013576,0.03286459],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9893111,0.0011581691,0.0005493792,0.00633793,0.00006157169,0.000037061003,0.000021161699,0.000047354933,0.002476304],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97902644,0.013645034,0.0005770664,0.0008764889,0.003120347,0.002754737],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96945155,0.012015494,0.005758739,0.0012365103,0.0027743955,0.008763226],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011952158,0.0002955508,0.00053063344,0.0008402225,0.008756213,0.012500537,0.001508117,0.002563458,0.0045693703],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03988779,0.00048382647,0.00058686495,0.0009121487,0.010935769,0.0076278057,0.008075826,0.007029161,0.0010952934],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016453823,0.0003265478,0.12479922,0.0003489382,0.00008521522,0.0011111352,0.7580068,0.00024073072,0.0013519317,0.011907182,0.028355971,0.0733019],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012500189,0.00010406215,0.043637678,0.0003658341,0.000025545658,0.0004268595,0.9154284,0.0003184268,0.0003743525,0.004176927,0.035036184,0.00009320654],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010269402,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009835199,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012500537,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0047120494,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007261214,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06320983},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400482800","doi":"10.55016/ojs/cpai.v6i1.76570","title":"An Officer and a Strategist","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Perspectives on Academic Integrity","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba; Assiniboine Community College","funders":"","keywords":"Strategist; Officer; Management; Political science; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.03910874790173826,"score_gpt":0.3507112132328145,"score_spread":0.3116024653310763,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400482800","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0024651978,0.004375309,0.00386045,0.6017148,0.041361667,0.0002887115,0.00018129239,0.0004269924,0.34532553],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.03074539,0.0030209941,0.0023453485,0.10924107,0.0024929538,0.00009032191,0.000103808205,0.00018944955,0.85177064],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99184895,0.001326502,0.00026373737,0.000910093,0.0036393933,0.0020113431],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98296714,0.0007677636,0.0003548114,0.00042039732,0.0054809786,0.010009023],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004854652,0.00085731636,0.00053881673,0.0012865639,0.021026507,0.011532644,0.0018016582,0.0066168597,0.06608744],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01405709,0.00058898306,0.0004765111,0.0010976116,0.005944475,0.0067380327,0.0058943843,0.011864312,0.023658909],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014175413,0.000025519468,0.00036141666,0.000046301448,0.00000369112,0.0002797423,0.0018244934,0.00005403337,0.00017001356,0.041526016,0.9356899,0.020004759],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002267088,0.000009072444,0.00014684848,0.00004761411,0.0000016502055,0.000110982655,0.0023959572,0.00004543682,0.000038174276,0.0012778814,0.995915,0.000009062144],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.18414527,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.26586515,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18414527,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.019192247,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06796656,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36614686},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400482808","doi":"10.55016/ojs/cpai.v6i2.77102","title":"An Attribution Theory Lens on Plagiarism: Examining the Beliefs of Preservice Teachers","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Perspectives on Academic Integrity","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Attribution; Psychology; Through-the-lens metering; Lens (geology); Mathematics education; Social psychology; Optics; Physics","score_opus":0.06401836504299194,"score_gpt":0.34441488418711613,"score_spread":0.2803965191441242,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400482808","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.72249603,0.004261283,0.1782272,0.029244209,0.0008292858,0.0013551399,0.00032370756,0.0001809753,0.06308209],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9740059,0.0011415033,0.020088172,0.0017894293,0.00014217482,0.001047004,0.000099115714,0.00004621801,0.0016404848],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9671609,0.02351682,0.0015693246,0.0027161033,0.0039018805,0.0011350584],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8601082,0.10936309,0.012021592,0.008736432,0.0073338025,0.002436924],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.046224874,0.0013237561,0.00090399233,0.0073423646,0.006444044,0.011019348,0.0031007535,0.0026678767,0.0064289276],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08261303,0.0007345865,0.0016495538,0.0049723866,0.027690422,0.014791431,0.01038705,0.0068440433,0.0005012615],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010157211,0.0006740528,0.1128828,0.0011348085,0.00013630507,0.000462083,0.61222047,0.0007994067,0.0010455154,0.18960297,0.0015575163,0.07938254],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009519153,0.00036999016,0.0934288,0.0027896487,0.0001962395,0.00059155474,0.569286,0.004625111,0.00218465,0.3058891,0.020383853,0.00015987425],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007135688,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006218519,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.046224874,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008222971,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009155804,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24446344},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["research_integrity"],"domain":null,"study_design":"qualitative","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["research_integrity"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W4400482813","doi":"10.55016/ojs/cpai.v6i1.76772","title":"Exploring Official Academic Integrity Data","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Perspectives on Academic Integrity","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Research integrity; Data integrity; Academic integrity; Data science; Political science; Computer science; Computer security; Library science; Public relations","score_opus":0.2860422586479901,"score_gpt":0.3891125448216935,"score_spread":0.1030702861737034,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400482813","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.30472353,0.005357548,0.05732482,0.1112271,0.0016925158,0.004917978,0.17971273,0.0018278577,0.33321595],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.83996904,0.0048300996,0.039080087,0.010188712,0.00040973822,0.0031702847,0.054224018,0.0006445927,0.047483463],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.74865746,0.037453435,0.017829956,0.011396907,0.1641963,0.020465953],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.29750824,0.116967954,0.060499884,0.06181426,0.44523647,0.017973142],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.122998014,0.0007589712,0.00150818,0.028043786,0.019791882,0.024864627,0.0072538345,0.0027670104,0.007235291],"category_scores_gemma":[0.41136307,0.0011514259,0.0007165038,0.050380893,0.0107479775,0.0080108,0.014152002,0.0068375575,0.0022128967],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00039381185,0.00028674531,0.21712725,0.002552267,0.0002081496,0.0010026824,0.19378608,0.0015929831,0.0012315597,0.21267311,0.1650085,0.20413679],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000033218956,0.00008298442,0.13137038,0.0025231317,0.0000987893,0.00020849472,0.099812105,0.0021901422,0.0020568303,0.016697332,0.74464417,0.00028240384],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9347682,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9327211,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9347682,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.12822922,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.31405345,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9303724},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400482815","doi":"10.55016/ojs/cpai.v6i1.76505","title":"Pre-Service Teachers Beliefs about Plagiarism: An Attribution Theory Lens","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Perspectives on Academic Integrity","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Attribution; Lens (geology); Psychology; Service (business); Through-the-lens metering; Social psychology; Business; Physics; Optics","score_opus":0.04421090954988021,"score_gpt":0.33893504879676073,"score_spread":0.2947241392468805,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400482815","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7583892,0.0050450945,0.062779345,0.05607532,0.0006223913,0.00073756167,0.00023123415,0.00026193593,0.11585794],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.992777,0.0010806943,0.0034124427,0.00076267944,0.00009619313,0.00016467922,0.000043505548,0.000025239353,0.0016374204],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9722044,0.01707958,0.0015784067,0.0023717342,0.0052517955,0.001514153],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.85947406,0.09845407,0.016491378,0.00914313,0.0115283765,0.004908937],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03623334,0.0009165652,0.0006990283,0.007399763,0.006675555,0.014167417,0.0028834024,0.0029344412,0.007698182],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07935021,0.0007392245,0.0010036826,0.00359496,0.02181678,0.012125194,0.007552,0.006526446,0.0007065833],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007099143,0.0006670279,0.14421897,0.00058436766,0.00007106974,0.00092586,0.6580919,0.00041151512,0.0008032027,0.12796493,0.0022324647,0.06395774],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004193198,0.00014360916,0.10113819,0.001435965,0.000078159406,0.00066124497,0.73923814,0.0028245319,0.0012885024,0.12682542,0.026208388,0.000116014206],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00837254,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0073829778,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03623334,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0107485,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0074697337,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1916225},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["research_integrity"],"domain":null,"study_design":"qualitative","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":true,"confidence":"medium"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"domain":"methods","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W4400482818","doi":"10.55016/ojs/cpai.v4i1.72913","title":"Building Collaborative Networks to Support Academic Integrity","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Perspectives on Academic Integrity","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Academic integrity; Research integrity; Computer science; Data integrity; Engineering ethics; Computer security; Engineering; Library science","score_opus":0.03229161025195651,"score_gpt":0.3498144151766333,"score_spread":0.31752280492467677,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400482818","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05448047,0.0030962436,0.1769061,0.20167316,0.003928448,0.0017258084,0.0003066255,0.002623919,0.55525917],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.74754006,0.0029874933,0.12439597,0.010982871,0.0012510148,0.0017152817,0.0005285589,0.00080271286,0.10979614],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.94644135,0.033770088,0.0013023294,0.0036003797,0.009318124,0.0055676997],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.83402556,0.046969656,0.010880015,0.018798083,0.0337698,0.055556934],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.044140372,0.0009505516,0.00065812643,0.0040400764,0.034634262,0.021228043,0.006156828,0.0066444073,0.033073273],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1134532,0.0010102672,0.0009965255,0.0031980355,0.01226641,0.027404053,0.042722195,0.0071178963,0.011821279],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016969278,0.0005297961,0.01021557,0.00066689483,0.00013574224,0.0015214443,0.17847781,0.0033091363,0.001815844,0.30877066,0.2507793,0.24360818],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000826144,0.00013858949,0.0018831269,0.00077359396,0.000044350174,0.00028354538,0.058630347,0.0029781135,0.00061960245,0.10225789,0.8321927,0.00011559602],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.047878426,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.067627884,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.047878426,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01760275,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06584487,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23343939},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400482819","doi":"10.55016/ojs/cpai.v4i1.72824","title":"Proactive not punitive: Approaching academic integrity from an educational perspective","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Perspectives on Academic Integrity","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Saskatchewan Polytechnic; University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Punitive damages; Perspective (graphical); Academic integrity; Engineering ethics; Psychology; Political science; Computer science; Engineering; Law; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.05648466931229684,"score_gpt":0.3693229868471757,"score_spread":0.31283831753487884,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400482819","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.27230608,0.013117792,0.038378894,0.25322554,0.00084881013,0.00023722836,0.00008928936,0.00033605297,0.42146033],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9635226,0.0050114905,0.00854708,0.008899444,0.000117909665,0.00006152486,0.000023810015,0.00006274437,0.013753318],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9721514,0.017428739,0.0007785521,0.0010674436,0.0054056994,0.0031681666],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95903486,0.018150324,0.0044251163,0.0023957745,0.0078654345,0.008128594],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018259902,0.00059678167,0.00050876377,0.005600073,0.028517006,0.027573837,0.0028443227,0.005756413,0.0040171556],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024808038,0.0006001076,0.000426893,0.004112952,0.04774284,0.013636668,0.015029021,0.01214789,0.00067914644],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041024643,0.00016457203,0.011214423,0.0006090975,0.000029596858,0.0022708257,0.6763009,0.00043945157,0.0017666756,0.23218307,0.0072382325,0.06774225],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000095986015,0.000120768025,0.0059012347,0.00091078854,0.000028793895,0.0013342648,0.7545395,0.00030864088,0.0026699272,0.052672025,0.18145071,0.000053696956],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0898215,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.19692065,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0898215,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.034832712,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06430703,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25273025},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400482823","doi":"10.55016/ojs/cpai.v5i2.76456","title":"Pens for Hire: Part 3","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Perspectives on Academic Integrity","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.06597805505546861,"score_gpt":0.3584994969803379,"score_spread":0.2925214419248693,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400482823","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0062560583,0.0021495852,0.0015946605,0.024385499,0.01825163,0.0006959553,0.0015198757,0.000917033,0.94422966],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.009090675,0.00046928745,0.0003923791,0.0023484388,0.00068897195,0.000055110475,0.00027437077,0.00017793884,0.98650277],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961598,0.00023077268,0.0001190168,0.00030582532,0.0024367888,0.00074784114],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99279684,0.0006385891,0.00017718914,0.0006130022,0.004001484,0.0017729809],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025394547,0.0007988213,0.0006274296,0.001748469,0.010335495,0.0060978252,0.0020980611,0.0034846973,0.38070735],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008243158,0.00045377162,0.0005925687,0.0016881741,0.0016803937,0.0018620143,0.0026809105,0.0028193211,0.119637296],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027900265,0.000051302934,0.00052801816,0.000109754605,0.000002367999,0.00019224195,0.0013816956,0.000039918283,0.0012512692,0.007963479,0.9198625,0.06858955],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000020489517,0.000020904788,0.0011470221,0.000029651063,0.0000012441346,0.00007004382,0.0007216531,0.000019236146,0.0002386249,0.00022479825,0.99751735,0.000007393893],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1251609,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.294172,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.38070735,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008064356,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016468307,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8833458},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400620696","doi":"10.1080/08989621.2024.2377723","title":"The punishment intensity for research misconduct and its related factors: An exploratory study on hospitals in Mainland China","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Accountability in Research","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Mainland China; Misconduct; Exploratory research; China; Scientific misconduct; Punishment (psychology); Psychology; Criminology; Applied psychology; Social psychology; Political science; Law; Sociology; Medicine; Social science; Alternative medicine","score_opus":0.2987618849254758,"score_gpt":0.5154437601731929,"score_spread":0.21668187524771715,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400620696","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9993729,0.000065965425,0.00009007724,0.00014242635,0.0000020846996,0.000018731045,0.000036106103,0.0000015854039,0.0002702342],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996897,0.0000489701,0.00008800381,0.000038704897,0.0000038380567,0.000014301895,0.000032128853,9.829871e-7,0.00008341462],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9912805,0.003412899,0.0015826662,0.00083062466,0.0016946068,0.0011988425],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9405016,0.014375982,0.03353824,0.0028750412,0.0047345576,0.0039746594],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010753804,0.00033559336,0.00051691534,0.0023970136,0.0024505183,0.0013836365,0.0008960983,0.00060879847,0.0014048772],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02476261,0.0002929301,0.000527114,0.002811416,0.0022291,0.0012555383,0.0023953745,0.0010827886,0.00012443248],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042088348,0.00007511291,0.98943347,0.000035982834,0.000036628833,0.00013783835,0.005422007,0.00007188518,0.00011555981,0.00010347953,0.0001215546,0.0044042845],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000031736843,0.0000492871,0.9937156,0.000021773103,0.00001305322,0.00008015337,0.0055444343,0.00022851388,0.00006229225,0.00006712935,0.00020556906,0.000009117483],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02750282,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04082843,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9993912,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00418688,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006347502,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05687225},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["research_integrity"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W4400686170","doi":"10.1016/j.appdev.2024.101676","title":"Role of moral judgments and persistence in elementary school students' academic cheating","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"De Veber","funders":"Ministry of Education of the People's Republic of China","keywords":"Cheating; Psychology; Persistence (discontinuity); Developmental psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.03378723366445879,"score_gpt":0.3605146169242266,"score_spread":0.3267273832597678,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400686170","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9991062,0.00003660869,0.000021263433,0.00007984559,0.0000028117522,0.0000032088656,0.000014094591,0.0000020038883,0.0007337921],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99971455,0.000016497559,0.000028995293,0.000015252918,0.0000032734008,0.0000026076182,0.000018102599,0.0000021461653,0.00019870131],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99743783,0.00082327385,0.00025175067,0.0003248737,0.00074967445,0.00041260358],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.91833097,0.034431193,0.027964326,0.004666607,0.0057128146,0.008894094],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004314346,0.00027152378,0.0005348213,0.0013432187,0.0013842764,0.0045350036,0.0012357815,0.0016417768,0.004707492],"category_scores_gemma":[0.047587268,0.00044174827,0.0005572883,0.00096171984,0.002247996,0.0017356004,0.0017136706,0.0050089434,0.0005390042],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027338444,0.0012387282,0.9908112,0.000012581813,0.000059226182,0.00007446708,0.0021586441,0.0000712124,0.00051703147,0.00025349186,0.000092764465,0.0044373195],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009446839,0.00012096025,0.9969002,0.000008676227,0.000022145929,0.00006218501,0.002058183,0.00028037708,0.00016309673,0.00026439855,0.00010038032,0.000009916445],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005164763,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0074149123,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99835825,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009778142,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018682193,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.022816718},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401115764","doi":"10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e35460","title":"Characteristics of retracted articles in ophthalmology","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Heliyon","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Hôpital du Saint-Sacrement; Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Labelling; Scientific misconduct; Medicine; Library science; Ophthalmology; Computer science; Psychology; Alternative medicine; Pathology; Criminology","score_opus":0.03264553433157864,"score_gpt":0.32639913853789587,"score_spread":0.29375360420631724,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401115764","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8369017,0.1110755,0.0033900866,0.007682705,0.0014116049,0.0008710715,0.012309966,0.00028460036,0.026072765],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94636714,0.03382394,0.0041935993,0.0010902963,0.00091947976,0.00047827067,0.007042239,0.00017827103,0.0059067076],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.96957266,0.005893724,0.013432699,0.0011463618,0.008890915,0.0010636435],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6809748,0.13906477,0.11373524,0.010165176,0.050487373,0.005572655],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013463373,0.00041858436,0.0008006579,0.02736067,0.0019096907,0.0036749612,0.00097127113,0.0013097229,0.0062526558],"category_scores_gemma":[0.17538802,0.0002674703,0.0012688296,0.024229042,0.001141409,0.0036690058,0.0022972724,0.0010405693,0.0022691975],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012272933,0.00017043758,0.71155083,0.01157535,0.00061029,0.009202989,0.018206453,0.00026440455,0.0028715355,0.0019973572,0.018072566,0.22425048],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000046725923,0.0003160156,0.8425199,0.0063522537,0.000517217,0.029971665,0.016361395,0.00041628975,0.00236978,0.0018652441,0.099097624,0.00016598291],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013560479,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021051753,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99869025,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018759784,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028855132,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07120198},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401242140","doi":"10.1177/00218863241269827","title":"Misrepresenting Methodology: A Critique of Epistemological Engineering in Social Science Research","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia, Okanagan Campus; Kelowna General Hospital; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Sociology; Scientific misconduct; Philosophy of science; Misconduct; Rhetoric; Rigour; Scope (computer science); Empirical research; Engineering ethics; Social science; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.26381016342185765,"score_gpt":0.5162792380013734,"score_spread":0.2524690745795158,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401242140","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008664706,0.0204143,0.15911585,0.75689274,0.00505712,0.00020211656,0.00005492732,0.00020028409,0.049397934],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.70338637,0.014292231,0.10450231,0.15375409,0.014628161,0.0018299437,0.000058134247,0.000817601,0.0067312745],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.5528026,0.35705176,0.014117445,0.014718594,0.057177126,0.0041325027],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.3745161,0.5644059,0.012996762,0.021606907,0.024062209,0.0024122167],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.3064577,0.0019792863,0.0039864727,0.015615324,0.023861539,0.0336905,0.010721468,0.02858816,0.001509295],"category_scores_gemma":[0.35198864,0.0017992236,0.003476276,0.011358716,0.28647918,0.03877364,0.018598692,0.0401529,0.0009499296],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010785525,0.0000093596855,0.00013035454,0.0001644652,0.000018601499,0.00007331457,0.024257606,0.00022807354,0.000043471344,0.96735585,0.0034681559,0.0042399955],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027191301,0.000013958532,0.00007698213,0.00053405826,0.000013963645,0.00008972099,0.0034062257,0.00065949996,0.00016347598,0.9571076,0.037873525,0.00003389755],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008025938,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0051053884,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9714118,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.025226075,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.029593708,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.85526115},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401256164","doi":"10.31468/dwr.1051","title":"Examining AI Guidelines in Canadian Universities: Implications on Academic Integrity in Academic Writing","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Discourse and Writing/Rédactologie","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; Niagara College","funders":"","keywords":"Academic integrity; Research integrity; Academic writing; Academic dishonesty; Psychology; Medical education; Political science; Engineering ethics; Mathematics education; Higher education; Medicine; Public relations; Engineering; Law","score_opus":0.203320511479892,"score_gpt":0.4814413194591376,"score_spread":0.2781208079792456,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401256164","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.80394644,0.0058681066,0.0047024363,0.068849035,0.000452104,0.0007119992,0.00082459085,0.00012782132,0.11451742],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9875294,0.0020114619,0.0033692524,0.0020663545,0.0000315518,0.00014585692,0.00015429233,0.000032069795,0.004659669],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.92385805,0.019728135,0.0075745364,0.0041504498,0.034124173,0.010564608],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6559443,0.13969114,0.042191625,0.010517435,0.13008375,0.021571707],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06496081,0.0005097159,0.000912445,0.016708009,0.052403368,0.023801954,0.0046643126,0.0028881938,0.0034684564],"category_scores_gemma":[0.21612243,0.00081004336,0.0004448362,0.030962491,0.028820468,0.0076653557,0.011239356,0.0049670977,0.0003761223],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007629253,0.00007991279,0.061409034,0.00071114284,0.00002361783,0.0008487228,0.78235877,0.0003234225,0.00081616524,0.05238327,0.008957797,0.09201188],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011078657,0.000032333424,0.06400899,0.0011517102,0.000026564736,0.00015127752,0.8473998,0.00047411644,0.0008248582,0.0071217613,0.07864882,0.00014868015],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9617485,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97687846,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9971118,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.2184588,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.4138262,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[{"model":"gpt","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"qualitative","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":true,"about_ca_topic":true,"confidence":"high"},{"model":"grok","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":true,"about_ca_topic":true,"confidence":"high"},{"model":"opus","categories":["research_integrity"],"domain":null,"study_design":"qualitative","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":true,"about_ca_topic":true,"confidence":"medium"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W4401631931","doi":"10.22215/etd/2024-15985","title":"Predicting Threats to Academic Integrity: A Text-Mining and Scenario Modeling Framework","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Cheating; Computer science; Stylometry; Adversarial system; Data science; Phishing; Copying; Artificial intelligence; Computer security; World Wide Web; Psychology; Social psychology; Political science","score_opus":0.051371654340354005,"score_gpt":0.3777493348622184,"score_spread":0.3263776805218644,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401631931","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.26556966,0.0024596818,0.69475955,0.014116376,0.0002565862,0.0013389392,0.009390983,0.0016711191,0.0104370965],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7956472,0.000995018,0.1904571,0.00067606295,0.00033592334,0.0006699493,0.00863553,0.00008147747,0.0025016863],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.996332,0.0019876882,0.00030292297,0.00070072856,0.00047427302,0.00020246429],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97580963,0.019316979,0.0022033744,0.0010066496,0.0010434147,0.0006200254],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0052738967,0.0014460373,0.00077572616,0.0070644813,0.0010257531,0.0034601795,0.0020047256,0.0027558934,0.002093436],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019128002,0.00055956375,0.0019595453,0.0033064221,0.0011366052,0.006319597,0.0017307453,0.0024914902,0.0011213511],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00043454213,0.0013956224,0.08801661,0.0006368357,0.00055244175,0.0018200073,0.001985135,0.56931,0.002347174,0.0647273,0.014138179,0.2546361],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012198497,0.0000719114,0.0030218014,0.00006847825,0.00003108472,0.00016947772,0.00040703712,0.9565644,0.0004687022,0.036155038,0.0030026578,0.000027190828],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0052158907,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005516037,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9972441,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00211913,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012758012,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.027891338},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402008353","doi":"10.14429/djlit.44.4.19733","title":"Trends in Plagiarism","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"DESIDOC Journal of Library & Information Technology","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.010413566208841924,"score_gpt":0.27516627072139965,"score_spread":0.2647527045125577,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402008353","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.770777,0.12710442,0.0059906063,0.009009808,0.0006861785,0.0001972137,0.018971678,0.0011733843,0.066089794],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93372244,0.04026829,0.0039125495,0.00049388746,0.0009568968,0.00015894121,0.010595788,0.00025510206,0.009636076],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98782164,0.0013415249,0.0020822887,0.0025965152,0.005579587,0.0005783977],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.90487117,0.029940331,0.030387925,0.0042612613,0.028234752,0.0023045982],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0070235287,0.00045499226,0.0008233061,0.04739523,0.0012536736,0.0050948295,0.0010186373,0.0010908435,0.0047099837],"category_scores_gemma":[0.051644836,0.00026345626,0.0007769424,0.055812962,0.0015434559,0.0062747793,0.0018539627,0.0011951249,0.0025044838],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005344097,0.00009581437,0.4595649,0.0072756484,0.00038150055,0.0012706696,0.02167822,0.0011974223,0.0047883415,0.019255871,0.023934301,0.46002293],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020147812,0.00030751337,0.73295885,0.0019035868,0.00021531146,0.0045403843,0.010103715,0.0019122196,0.004700165,0.005766492,0.23743013,0.00014135116],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002641521,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022909073,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9989092,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002732115,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001701431,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.037144423},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["research_integrity"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["research_integrity"],"domain":null,"study_design":"design_other","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W4402034355","doi":"10.55667/10.55667/ijede.2024.v39.i1.1327","title":"Exploring the Impact: How Online Exam Proctoring Reduces Cheating and Enhances Course Legitimacy","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International journal of e-learning & distance education","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cheating; Legitimacy; Ligne; Psychology; Medical education; Humanities; Social psychology; Medicine; Political science","score_opus":0.05481533831290123,"score_gpt":0.3895782490704714,"score_spread":0.33476291075757014,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402034355","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99897194,0.000035969875,0.00025208932,0.000067026864,0.0000035452035,0.000015891243,0.000008546316,0.000007133248,0.0006377783],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984085,0.00005664063,0.00079083216,0.00004214046,0.000010697682,0.00001824796,0.000021855367,0.0000026050536,0.0006485203],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99781185,0.0013407657,0.00012308106,0.00013232882,0.00040228493,0.00018965174],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98037726,0.012097138,0.004113295,0.0010581758,0.001439003,0.00091509515],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026110802,0.00023386498,0.00023517663,0.0003705095,0.00037382537,0.001055653,0.0002911504,0.0004078125,0.0025388037],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01740494,0.00011202549,0.00029792523,0.00025282855,0.00032972998,0.0005475996,0.000587319,0.00043177596,0.00029658532],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000978746,0.0027989752,0.68335384,0.00053952844,0.0001463598,0.00034716076,0.023690095,0.00039796106,0.038205635,0.00029065268,0.00076443906,0.2484866],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025655152,0.0037295858,0.9760448,0.000045891185,0.00005541444,0.00016737988,0.010460022,0.000608234,0.006005889,0.00010325025,0.0027311551,0.000022727927],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007434428,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014848483,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9995922,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023598972,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00044401985,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.013808906},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402098368","doi":"10.5539/hes.v14n3p203","title":"Reviewer Acknowledgements for Higher Education Studies, Vol. 14, No. 3","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Higher Education Studies","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Higher education; Mathematics education; Psychology; Pedagogy; Medical education; Political science; Medicine","score_opus":0.10103254394180573,"score_gpt":0.44562712835372614,"score_spread":0.3445945844119204,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402098368","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00021823269,0.005758154,0.002368847,0.13085952,0.85047644,0.0009137937,0.00055137544,0.00068707205,0.008166585],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.012424366,0.016926622,0.009415605,0.15830933,0.6516995,0.0054628886,0.0022055928,0.0033205303,0.14023557],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9233628,0.019713907,0.013161575,0.0050954814,0.036315456,0.0023508274],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.2630528,0.04193149,0.020271506,0.014096057,0.6426908,0.017957434],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.059586152,0.002922987,0.0039047492,0.010691609,0.0057375077,0.014843637,0.004957322,0.00752857,0.09553472],"category_scores_gemma":[0.44136727,0.0011087249,0.0030871152,0.0065375026,0.0029853315,0.008013814,0.0049960013,0.009020808,0.062075462],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017746366,0.0000047479484,0.00012012505,0.0003522232,0.00000944028,0.000039047234,0.000118434014,0.00000800353,0.000036394013,0.0004011287,0.9881643,0.01072837],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025994475,0.000018675433,0.00042096656,0.00151604,0.000026516525,0.00027841644,0.00044607552,0.000087736466,0.00008550754,0.0010226992,0.99603516,0.00003634264],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017550121,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002833807,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90446526,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006731477,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0177697,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31959546},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402104837","doi":"10.55016/ojs/jet.v52i3.69721","title":"Designing and Implementing an Online Academic Integrity Tutorial: Identifying the Challenges within a Post-secondary Context","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of educational thought.","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Academic integrity; Context (archaeology); Computer science; Research integrity; Medical education; Data science; Psychology; World Wide Web; Engineering ethics; Medicine; Engineering; Library science","score_opus":0.10385529497332736,"score_gpt":0.39545157437423306,"score_spread":0.2915962794009057,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402104837","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89333177,0.00044265925,0.06039155,0.010402023,0.00042761446,0.0028087927,0.00006985163,0.0012317335,0.030893981],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8885242,0.00048817866,0.09549075,0.0021702207,0.000103582395,0.0009933679,0.00010758095,0.00020201769,0.01192017],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98381627,0.009609907,0.0006707037,0.0010076765,0.0024608988,0.0024345387],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9273525,0.025013287,0.006077023,0.004576721,0.017697776,0.019282714],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.031126542,0.00045476892,0.00046717326,0.0012244205,0.008083244,0.007937942,0.003008548,0.0025268786,0.0041666795],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06553998,0.0005097288,0.00043393025,0.00053911365,0.0030076068,0.005856684,0.006518354,0.003849837,0.0019427005],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002619335,0.012836628,0.08097152,0.0013658833,0.000049073788,0.0031237528,0.33642748,0.001926576,0.01614628,0.009174708,0.020675665,0.5170405],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018817387,0.00803591,0.08621936,0.0030606529,0.00016001552,0.0040392033,0.49590224,0.011111024,0.032210544,0.01071865,0.3478958,0.00045831557],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036159735,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01341427,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9974731,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038415582,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.022194626,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16461486},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402109748","doi":"10.55016/ojs/jet.v52i3.69725","title":"Academic Integrity in the University","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of educational thought.","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Academic integrity; Research integrity; Engineering ethics; Engineering","score_opus":0.03186858817230185,"score_gpt":0.34166703398439663,"score_spread":0.30979844581209476,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402109748","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09623528,0.012742785,0.0009806564,0.5869533,0.002955824,0.00004544464,0.00006768106,0.00008723369,0.2999318],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95733637,0.0017920336,0.00022471124,0.0158927,0.0016910601,0.000018208737,0.000017306036,0.000041540927,0.022986095],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9677433,0.02043094,0.001148651,0.0012038032,0.0047063073,0.0047670044],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.90178615,0.031411596,0.0090307435,0.007812487,0.018554762,0.031404287],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.024970014,0.0002595826,0.00089810026,0.002957225,0.03217595,0.028288785,0.0015600096,0.00921498,0.015351308],"category_scores_gemma":[0.080687635,0.00038528946,0.0004695173,0.0027558121,0.031722374,0.014697217,0.012997121,0.014650611,0.0023390462],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016793687,0.00034685247,0.017691962,0.00022140055,0.00006229953,0.0006083219,0.092195965,0.00021714003,0.0003295632,0.6646111,0.14229769,0.08124974],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000057209603,0.00024273247,0.028344696,0.0011985039,0.000058032212,0.0006044357,0.115041055,0.0005112061,0.0009587935,0.30419037,0.5486579,0.00013513718],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00719943,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009343744,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.990785,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012526746,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.037927523,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13205564},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402109750","doi":"10.55016/ojs/jet.v52i3.69724","title":"Academic Integrity in a Student Practice Environment--An Elicitation Study","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of educational thought.","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Humber Polytechnic","funders":"","keywords":"Academic integrity; Research integrity; Psychology; Engineering ethics; Engineering; Social psychology","score_opus":0.03921283701907112,"score_gpt":0.4259017886413887,"score_spread":0.3866889516223176,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402109750","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9974535,0.000038856782,0.00091702276,0.00021962324,0.000006113202,0.00026422157,0.000060215516,0.000006309632,0.0010341236],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99517643,0.00022929613,0.0019073684,0.0003276853,0.000021520102,0.000683821,0.00010260108,0.000008846247,0.0015424164],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9835783,0.011463903,0.00075617176,0.0005746979,0.002168967,0.0014580402],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9650913,0.02412224,0.0033554223,0.0020532608,0.0035594576,0.0018183702],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009925396,0.0005372764,0.0005752457,0.0011170427,0.0054400438,0.002706981,0.0009865072,0.0018730841,0.0023526722],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027342835,0.0005651666,0.00041746956,0.0011913714,0.0019875104,0.001594804,0.005574633,0.0022749968,0.0008337763],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00045444228,0.0028848231,0.086085275,0.00056161964,0.000021242757,0.0022330421,0.8579451,0.00025009384,0.012027504,0.00083772186,0.00097464275,0.03572453],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008126791,0.0036048428,0.079582036,0.00023054707,0.00003153608,0.0015995448,0.884605,0.00097370637,0.013026693,0.0007342873,0.015449013,0.00008154975],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011770698,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031826636,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9981269,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020629114,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025517435,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05249113},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402110933","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-65731-3_1","title":"Introduction: Academic Integrity and the Modern Academic Library","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Ethics and integrity in educational contexts","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Medicine Hat College; Assiniboine Community College","funders":"","keywords":"Academic integrity; Academic library; Computer science; Library science","score_opus":0.057740691371623215,"score_gpt":0.35915977335778776,"score_spread":0.3014190819861645,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402110933","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0007316276,0.068935975,0.002767367,0.042311143,0.011287104,0.00003650601,0.00017809478,0.00013620027,0.873616],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.017428974,0.03678371,0.0017392172,0.019790703,0.014607277,0.00006178211,0.00016064418,0.00017209064,0.90925556],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994578,0.00015169755,0.000023482908,0.00008243194,0.00022969281,0.000054912085],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99873585,0.0007825079,0.000047340218,0.000056872817,0.00027047767,0.000106918],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00075737195,0.0005564147,0.00040893018,0.0019833983,0.0030695305,0.0072528725,0.001065026,0.0038825253,0.058761727],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019339886,0.00028365367,0.0003519536,0.002606928,0.005117032,0.007324522,0.0023261174,0.005430203,0.015852286],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000091441825,0.000029319823,0.000071305665,0.00017784482,0.0000021066369,0.000043685326,0.0013957038,0.00011825099,0.000079538644,0.46498802,0.49775115,0.03533398],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000013429084,0.0000042580537,0.00008687163,0.00014701708,9.302392e-7,0.000058558213,0.00024306266,0.000038447495,0.000025173807,0.038505517,0.9608848,0.0000040320288],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0040060463,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00801685,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9961175,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002929441,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027117366,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19657755},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402110945","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-65731-3","title":"Academic Integrity and the Role of the Academic Library","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Ethics and integrity in educational contexts","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Alberta","keywords":"Academic integrity; Academic library; Computer science; Library science; Political science","score_opus":0.0405946279024405,"score_gpt":0.35688045350343484,"score_spread":0.31628582560099433,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402110945","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0042668427,0.015905557,0.0013890244,0.041192483,0.0005761403,0.000011687736,0.000013598439,0.000035673962,0.9366091],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.52175933,0.011994358,0.0011942772,0.010138759,0.0022113156,0.000075913784,0.000019986002,0.00013005617,0.45247597],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9913156,0.0060738088,0.00017621687,0.00032135533,0.001433518,0.00067943585],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98666614,0.009469221,0.0008115965,0.00075161835,0.0012862851,0.0010151122],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00495001,0.00035387673,0.00042263902,0.0015328812,0.012378141,0.025631914,0.0012725858,0.006155488,0.013547397],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013301446,0.00030735458,0.00024087036,0.0025907194,0.04310967,0.015006274,0.0056875786,0.0071368124,0.0035164107],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006356194,0.00001240844,0.00010483726,0.000031085794,0.0000014527419,0.000048547896,0.007016385,0.000052527943,0.000023422355,0.966607,0.019007822,0.007088234],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007764191,0.000017982711,0.00064423814,0.00028330178,0.0000051248035,0.00019481951,0.013460038,0.00020537282,0.00023139427,0.57126117,0.413673,0.00001576306],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006140661,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010023895,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9938445,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008207787,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010571321,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.059551895},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402110995","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-65731-3_7","title":"Librarians and Learning Designers on Academic Integrity: A Proactive Approach","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Ethics and integrity in educational contexts","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Newfoundland and Labrador Centre for Applied Health Research; Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Academic integrity; Psychology; Engineering ethics; Cognitive science; Business; Computer science; Engineering; Social psychology","score_opus":0.10828403770152442,"score_gpt":0.3737811397570358,"score_spread":0.26549710205551136,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402110995","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008328262,0.016274435,0.02865648,0.17524485,0.0022049658,0.00012380764,0.00002996282,0.00026318117,0.7688741],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.46586585,0.012902915,0.016575927,0.038773447,0.0024280404,0.00046211184,0.000044284938,0.00045824776,0.46248925],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.971704,0.022110472,0.000546138,0.0009043203,0.0038735361,0.0008615032],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9465849,0.04391026,0.0014197152,0.0020934262,0.0034060187,0.0025856947],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0199519,0.0008153777,0.0008976229,0.003591742,0.01637275,0.038900554,0.0026854414,0.012807039,0.0101474775],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023901735,0.0010648394,0.00043610547,0.0038997077,0.041359548,0.030933825,0.014239691,0.011428134,0.0033331488],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009774493,0.000045128487,0.00022531343,0.00015115927,0.000005953334,0.00012820623,0.0633653,0.00010244983,0.00009176181,0.8676111,0.045647196,0.022616692],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020440419,0.000037489277,0.00020036571,0.00070604373,0.00001903809,0.00024108106,0.063663796,0.00025687797,0.00047252385,0.3366781,0.59767896,0.000025285577],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022554884,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005194701,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.987193,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008605062,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0154704945,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10551697},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402111018","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-65731-3_5","title":"Grounding Academic Integrity Education in Positive and Proactive Pedagogy","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Ethics and integrity in educational contexts","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Douglas College","funders":"","keywords":"Academic integrity; Pedagogy; Engineering ethics; Psychology; Engineering","score_opus":0.07589957708340787,"score_gpt":0.43394200282529255,"score_spread":0.35804242574188466,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402111018","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013322087,0.004212202,0.025485685,0.03909083,0.0009829453,0.00007504874,0.000009614,0.00012780473,0.9166937],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.73707795,0.0032898316,0.018300183,0.0059893294,0.00046486492,0.00018331691,0.000020586738,0.0001659884,0.2345079],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9935364,0.0039608623,0.00011026176,0.00035016108,0.0015934843,0.0004487712],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99239576,0.0045651174,0.00044947103,0.00067780487,0.0009219746,0.0009899866],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006987134,0.000481153,0.00034913322,0.0011405831,0.0056784875,0.013186561,0.0015317583,0.003594253,0.0073921317],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009393366,0.00030638152,0.00025158227,0.0007683823,0.024027552,0.010321731,0.010783083,0.008673189,0.0018407396],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004245623,0.00006353024,0.00026452943,0.000065233486,0.000002040646,0.00005164007,0.020140044,0.00016651537,0.00019051506,0.92222893,0.01183068,0.04499215],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006144148,0.00003355255,0.0005204555,0.0005499832,0.000005592048,0.00013185429,0.017549947,0.00042027474,0.0010317094,0.7173165,0.26242074,0.000013210962],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015889654,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004690445,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9964057,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00552667,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011285652,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.040099025},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402111067","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-65731-3_3","title":"The Role of Credit-Bearing Information Literacy Courses as a Preventative Approach to Academic Integrity Education in First-Year University Students: A Case Study","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Ethics and integrity in educational contexts","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Saint Paul University","funders":"","keywords":"Academic integrity; Information literacy; Mathematics education; Medical education; Bearing (navigation); Psychology; Pedagogy; Political science; Library science; Medicine; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.036941522478351814,"score_gpt":0.3929166335562303,"score_spread":0.3559751110778785,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402111067","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9310997,0.0013263633,0.0025272947,0.008359781,0.00018485718,0.0002637281,0.00004010342,0.00007445813,0.05612362],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94418925,0.002436731,0.00495859,0.0026906487,0.000072616065,0.00022486046,0.00004968277,0.0000530719,0.045324516],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9951213,0.0031320106,0.000102088656,0.00021203006,0.0007597616,0.00067264563],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9928214,0.004077125,0.00055491633,0.0003294569,0.00050622196,0.0017109164],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004731009,0.00046816026,0.00049561035,0.0011281446,0.010952581,0.0064832703,0.002898937,0.0042342264,0.0045957784],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009231713,0.00037473312,0.0004952071,0.0012406476,0.0049182544,0.0036024987,0.0047454094,0.0055764285,0.0010260273],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008694618,0.0080849035,0.02914331,0.00056891615,0.000019709962,0.02254576,0.7063474,0.0006855365,0.0019043542,0.047199164,0.028156936,0.15525706],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005226494,0.0020459734,0.016208518,0.000784839,0.000036247642,0.01601882,0.7145285,0.0016013746,0.004398485,0.0060467524,0.23817943,0.00009875727],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004059434,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01605019,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99576575,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0046310145,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0048369924,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03360051},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402274413","doi":"10.22541/au.172554489.90838259/v1","title":"A Model for an Academia-Industry Collaboration for Pharmacovigilance and Pharmacoepidemiology","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Columbia College","funders":"","keywords":"Pharmacovigilance; Pharmacoepidemiology; Business; Knowledge management; Pharmacology; Medicine; Computer science; Drug","score_opus":0.16028318508408,"score_gpt":0.4878767033380399,"score_spread":0.3275935182539599,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402274413","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.031824913,0.0017735778,0.40797526,0.23912875,0.0030688604,0.00343688,0.00042811962,0.0013893868,0.31097424],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6357302,0.0017275111,0.25381276,0.02759969,0.0016557162,0.006187617,0.00052923226,0.0004006837,0.07235662],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.92812455,0.04641481,0.0020358062,0.009146759,0.007827253,0.006450763],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9542141,0.016736383,0.00402351,0.004471654,0.008560904,0.011993432],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04295751,0.0019594093,0.0010018102,0.0041948413,0.012746376,0.020511473,0.004990039,0.012303521,0.02700003],"category_scores_gemma":[0.040423345,0.0015065416,0.0020799013,0.004233125,0.017584527,0.025943292,0.024596227,0.00914691,0.008639672],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023913577,0.0008450335,0.007855657,0.00032087622,0.000113868286,0.0015774234,0.0090258885,0.0035929463,0.00069539435,0.91157126,0.03523928,0.028923348],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006196398,0.0007321959,0.0020499604,0.00052750966,0.000069606605,0.0012441508,0.00958659,0.014881046,0.0003986624,0.77181506,0.19790234,0.00017319129],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009478538,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006103992,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04295751,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014583394,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.044543087,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22718376},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402339736","doi":"10.1007/s40979-024-00163-6","title":"Clues to fostering a program culture of academic integrity: findings from a multidimensional regression model","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal for Educational Integrity","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"Smith School of Business, Queen's University","keywords":"Regression analysis; Psychology; Academic integrity; Regression; Social psychology; Computer science; Machine learning; Psychoanalysis","score_opus":0.09444063427137273,"score_gpt":0.4713385927775645,"score_spread":0.3768979585061918,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402339736","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9856456,0.00024327652,0.008580424,0.0015280329,0.000035932633,0.00016424283,0.0002673448,0.000101522375,0.0034336275],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99586785,0.00011814283,0.0029351872,0.00006244825,0.0000135315395,0.00011802402,0.0001794948,0.00002399313,0.0006814324],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98428124,0.0112691475,0.0007126176,0.0013690571,0.0013934084,0.000974613],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9116453,0.06340097,0.011730441,0.005688121,0.004233592,0.0033016151],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020543797,0.0012766485,0.0010338599,0.002476168,0.0020532853,0.0060327444,0.0023892042,0.0011926884,0.009006829],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06594094,0.00065020367,0.0028222278,0.0024581943,0.0015677179,0.003425195,0.0047049234,0.0035497288,0.0008496524],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023461007,0.00083423994,0.9621156,0.0001501288,0.0009706767,0.00017891343,0.008240616,0.003023495,0.00025248286,0.0046408027,0.0010497235,0.018308861],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000652495,0.0007685972,0.811147,0.000568158,0.0015101364,0.0003453351,0.01694327,0.15267776,0.0006661252,0.010645139,0.0044909306,0.0001722783],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021490952,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013405772,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9988073,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017088694,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00425891,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10864729},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402580065","doi":"10.1139/facets-2024-0102","title":"A harm reduction approach to improving peer review by acknowledging its imperfections","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"FACETS","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University; University of Alberta; Ocean Tracking Network; Dalhousie University; McGill University; University of Ottawa; Environment and Climate Change Canada; Fisheries and Oceans Canada; Carleton University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Havforskningsinstituttet","keywords":"Harm reduction; Reduction (mathematics); Harm; Psychology; Law and economics; Risk analysis (engineering); Business; Medicine; Sociology; Social psychology; Nursing; Mathematics","score_opus":0.04031871544180062,"score_gpt":0.3493806028131221,"score_spread":0.3090618873713215,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402580065","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00602415,0.009182924,0.35042632,0.513304,0.007554104,0.0011232238,0.000070413495,0.0011317614,0.11118306],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.48911968,0.0100872805,0.3120561,0.13029085,0.01655501,0.003081757,0.00011193497,0.00096038386,0.037737068],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.41315603,0.3733934,0.024265127,0.029961895,0.15142259,0.0078009726],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.37476146,0.2880624,0.056832716,0.14789408,0.11806007,0.014389197],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.34905794,0.002291714,0.002476723,0.00949784,0.019395282,0.04031002,0.009085058,0.016910356,0.0053219046],"category_scores_gemma":[0.413697,0.0022641153,0.0026345605,0.0049431333,0.09000881,0.03639512,0.029618578,0.035217017,0.0042877276],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008895179,0.00013486794,0.0019219313,0.00168627,0.0003033045,0.00031087373,0.021395452,0.002806755,0.0015455153,0.8190085,0.04346932,0.1073283],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009497568,0.00029565982,0.0012570259,0.002045799,0.00013147117,0.0005130886,0.00402109,0.0025255815,0.0017578474,0.6213506,0.3657759,0.00023097421],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0043511796,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0039958237,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6509421,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.019851958,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.058745667,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.80272746},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403888260","doi":"10.1007/s10648-024-09965-z","title":"Effectiveness of Unproctored vs. Teacher-Proctored Exams in Reducing Students’ Cheating: A Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Field Experimental Study","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Educational Psychology Review","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Ministry of Education of the People's Republic of China","keywords":"Cheating; Psychology; Educational psychology; Randomized controlled trial; Mathematics education; Medical education; Pedagogy; Social psychology; Medicine; Internal medicine","score_opus":0.06871598428386531,"score_gpt":0.49146674526449735,"score_spread":0.422750760980632,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403888260","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95313555,0.013525473,0.0030276068,0.0004304642,0.0011565349,0.026705926,0.0005002581,0.00014770223,0.0013703522],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9221825,0.013814042,0.018471042,0.00068479916,0.0010661139,0.040482238,0.00029303873,0.000035087247,0.0029712038],"study_design_codex":"randomized_trial","study_design_gemma":"randomized_trial","domain_scores_codex":[0.9940171,0.0035686954,0.00073586934,0.00082042,0.00054483506,0.00031302555],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9891649,0.00599196,0.0019989654,0.00078572036,0.0009737043,0.001084788],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0066417796,0.0015095061,0.0044587264,0.001023197,0.00086960767,0.0010580216,0.0021398643,0.0032895661,0.005288656],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010881517,0.0009620123,0.0023851842,0.00071419746,0.0014697927,0.0011359926,0.0005673033,0.0022919234,0.0005682942],"study_design_candidate":"randomized_trial","study_design_consensus":"randomized_trial","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.6935888,0.19319786,0.00050197035,0.009650063,0.0023900482,0.000050216306,0.00026495897,0.0003606928,0.01083506,0.00029668876,0.00082758476,0.08803614],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.36496815,0.6231921,0.0031314625,0.0004930661,0.0023015197,0.000026621008,0.00009520358,0.0005622124,0.0035847088,0.00019724832,0.0013859946,0.000061779814],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00086757174,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018885469,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9967104,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00075920846,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018312233,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.035125494},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404038076","doi":"10.55016/ojs/cpai.v7i5.79767","title":"International Centre for Academic Integrity Canadian Consortium","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Perspectives on Academic Integrity","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Humber Polytechnic","funders":"","keywords":"Academic integrity; Research integrity; Library science; Political science; Computer science; Public relations","score_opus":0.03574172896017015,"score_gpt":0.34175264966478597,"score_spread":0.30601092070461583,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404038076","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0032508017,0.007536535,0.0044924617,0.25465608,0.010588636,0.0004696378,0.0016150292,0.0004964225,0.71689427],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1066406,0.0087991925,0.012252352,0.029433822,0.0023345521,0.00038543792,0.002257574,0.00054137455,0.83735514],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.96596545,0.0027351873,0.0010743105,0.0026524265,0.021186901,0.0063858163],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.874443,0.004559181,0.0029787917,0.0055780616,0.07656045,0.03588051],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016257629,0.00094837864,0.00079446915,0.004362575,0.030724289,0.02272857,0.0045947116,0.0067716367,0.093303345],"category_scores_gemma":[0.045952287,0.0005227542,0.00080455764,0.0053558834,0.008856948,0.0056236405,0.012665009,0.00942372,0.016142456],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025231959,0.000029948093,0.0010477119,0.00010846124,0.000010658258,0.00018690377,0.0012522709,0.00010170584,0.00016603585,0.20774603,0.75038916,0.038935937],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000044800213,0.0000051956763,0.00067324383,0.00009214406,0.000004798749,0.00007680686,0.0008039463,0.00007264615,0.00010786219,0.0031915752,0.9949478,0.00001955985],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.82255876,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.85031825,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9932284,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07998989,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.40940356,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.58036995},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404234502","doi":"10.1016/j.jecp.2024.106119","title":"Smiling, face covering, and rhythmic body rocking in children who cheat versus do not cheat","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Child Psychology","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; University of Toronto","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Psychology; Rhythm; Face (sociological concept); Developmental psychology; Cognitive psychology; Linguistics","score_opus":0.020976490401765472,"score_gpt":0.3732487020204658,"score_spread":0.3522722116187003,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404234502","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99980265,0.000024621257,0.000008661109,0.000009242116,0.0000010723317,0.0000026629023,0.00002158096,0.0000010981214,0.00012834804],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99960893,0.000054780307,0.000051012285,0.000011716322,0.0000024188305,0.000010814363,0.00007194983,0.000002233318,0.00018615474],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995371,0.00004779047,0.00005199305,0.00008556507,0.0001047235,0.00017285791],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998256,0.0002837457,0.0009865444,0.000074134565,0.00012100618,0.00027853873],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00051906484,0.00040075238,0.00044722567,0.0011925624,0.0005158347,0.0007406171,0.00028531166,0.00056263723,0.0014180136],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030878007,0.0003158597,0.0004084673,0.00042424595,0.0009317802,0.0005086399,0.00085617515,0.0007802344,0.00022248804],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022323582,0.00015993675,0.98732483,0.000032765056,0.000023519842,0.00034686312,0.0036340614,0.000028556913,0.004156255,0.00004586851,0.00008936763,0.003934778],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000028018317,0.00009122147,0.99778533,0.0000048268575,0.00000622244,0.00022327714,0.0016319811,0.000033709868,0.00016104871,0.000010577633,0.00004567871,0.0000033143203],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008658651,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014339416,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008658651,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005513335,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003679519,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.017216504},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404326436","doi":"10.3102/00346543241288240","title":"Academic Cheating, Achievement Orientations, and Culture Values: A Meta-Analysis","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of Educational Research","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Ministry of Education","keywords":"Cheating; Psychology; Academic achievement; Mathematics education; Meta-analysis; Social psychology","score_opus":0.2674560711120118,"score_gpt":0.5620555755742705,"score_spread":0.29459950446225874,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404326436","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020497158,0.9770711,0.0008940142,0.00028701883,0.00013393571,0.0001964875,0.0004634198,0.000027815384,0.00042905885],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.43414965,0.559094,0.0034212417,0.00094955316,0.00025277227,0.0007629845,0.00094896066,0.00003548899,0.0003852437],"study_design_codex":"meta_analysis","study_design_gemma":"meta_analysis","domain_scores_codex":[0.9945845,0.0028389557,0.0013050911,0.0006067154,0.0004996057,0.00016512668],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9834938,0.012534348,0.002152695,0.00066140975,0.0009563023,0.00020145059],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013461339,0.0020859356,0.010951171,0.004045262,0.0006230554,0.0034389896,0.0014538178,0.0015211985,0.0019091815],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026971335,0.0010970571,0.031411715,0.0050433325,0.0006568425,0.0013896934,0.0011544537,0.0017317366,0.00020235835],"study_design_candidate":"meta_analysis","study_design_consensus":"meta_analysis","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0021597107,0.000071062976,0.014684203,0.16034971,0.79938966,0.00013608673,0.00015734947,0.00047003166,0.00033575695,0.00019919426,0.00048358733,0.02156365],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035261284,0.00028358135,0.007942144,0.010626805,0.97898865,0.00008254789,0.000057285746,0.00016039255,0.00015560538,0.00020386132,0.001129978,0.000016451158],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004299302,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010059631,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99847883,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017666018,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022373963,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07119119},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404844171","doi":"10.5539/hes.v14n4p241","title":"Reviewer Acknowledgements for Higher Education Studies, Vol. 14, No. 4","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Higher Education Studies","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematics education; Higher education; Psychology; Pedagogy; Political science","score_opus":0.10182716451413937,"score_gpt":0.4461799442379471,"score_spread":0.34435277972380773,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404844171","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00018870874,0.0053035864,0.0021505686,0.11957375,0.8628445,0.00086622755,0.00054666324,0.000608818,0.007917115],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0113408035,0.016227443,0.009430389,0.13760686,0.6593574,0.0052665267,0.002486933,0.0029166618,0.15536691],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.921566,0.019248469,0.013422862,0.0051514027,0.038144156,0.0024672095],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.25186297,0.039323002,0.01971319,0.013954676,0.6586137,0.016532447],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06178062,0.0030215483,0.003963808,0.011988753,0.005997856,0.015187066,0.0052672396,0.007579038,0.103365816],"category_scores_gemma":[0.44801524,0.0011863557,0.0031250014,0.007144057,0.0029882991,0.008386748,0.005133775,0.009153498,0.06532205],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016760097,0.0000048082507,0.00010459281,0.0003309431,0.000009026318,0.00003627567,0.00010121437,0.000008148985,0.00003221438,0.0003936483,0.9879219,0.011040615],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002488461,0.00001918395,0.00039965377,0.0014143995,0.000025633848,0.0002368977,0.0004078975,0.00008261571,0.00008165554,0.0009286382,0.9963439,0.00003456155],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017904575,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002836936,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.103365816,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0067782174,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017655881,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34579307},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405313818","doi":"10.7202/1114970ar","title":"Central Management of Research Misconduct in the USA and Canada","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Bioethics","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Misconduct; Scientific misconduct; Plaintiff; Confidentiality; Political science; Conflict of interest; Research integrity; Public relations; Order (exchange); Business; Law; Medicine","score_opus":0.17854285104799206,"score_gpt":0.41940472979811405,"score_spread":0.240861878750122,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405313818","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08789076,0.011822219,0.03926948,0.54832214,0.0037398557,0.0036219158,0.0006174256,0.0009704375,0.30374578],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7374413,0.00933979,0.040965647,0.12653197,0.0014091153,0.0017794736,0.0005279714,0.00030618953,0.08169852],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.8349833,0.03502856,0.008591869,0.015281019,0.076344095,0.029771147],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.64654267,0.09174112,0.02315157,0.026150908,0.1428571,0.069556594],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.10979947,0.0006931528,0.001738199,0.0070884936,0.04039328,0.025355339,0.01129344,0.010606171,0.006020613],"category_scores_gemma":[0.17408712,0.0016813132,0.0013821411,0.007384557,0.029102484,0.008108301,0.020587526,0.01591394,0.00077837374],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003150461,0.00026125813,0.024925599,0.000618718,0.0003103898,0.00284169,0.028318569,0.0028780003,0.0021154182,0.60193396,0.15587056,0.17961074],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000534217,0.00038913792,0.06010532,0.0034796875,0.0005238163,0.0012444067,0.026332859,0.006038097,0.0044676876,0.13949496,0.7563096,0.0010801627],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.92516315,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9716062,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98939383,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.19153494,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.66178745,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.93770486},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":true,"about_ca_topic":true,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"design_other","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":true,"about_ca_topic":true,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W4405409524","doi":"10.1016/b978-0-443-13701-3.00540-5","title":"Academic Misconduct","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Elsevier eBooks","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"MacEwan University","funders":"","keywords":"Misconduct; Political science; Psychology; Criminology; Law","score_opus":0.038704350269417855,"score_gpt":0.31260240058607464,"score_spread":0.27389805031665676,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405409524","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00034392017,0.003559886,0.0007227517,0.007830013,0.0034685365,0.000053490414,0.00022895158,0.00029449625,0.98349804],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0024685087,0.00151348,0.00027172544,0.0018580029,0.00080120255,0.000043617263,0.00012897549,0.00011087824,0.99280363],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9939044,0.0012511277,0.0003761932,0.0007214403,0.0032939243,0.00045288543],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98135155,0.005919435,0.0011654375,0.0040856046,0.005982735,0.0014951405],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006578092,0.0012095879,0.0017504476,0.00524316,0.0063741654,0.016658485,0.002063139,0.008283988,0.38344535],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03572601,0.0009385675,0.0009254286,0.0063158968,0.0042027025,0.006287849,0.006638264,0.005170524,0.37324518],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011842438,0.000027986614,0.0002800131,0.00019111924,0.000007890992,0.00010670917,0.00053235097,0.00006675932,0.00011211238,0.03286164,0.84048426,0.1253173],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003305914,0.000008206692,0.0001971993,0.0003059285,0.0000058957166,0.000115862276,0.00019582431,0.000087627996,0.00008749615,0.009703213,0.9892825,0.0000070709407],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028097897,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0066205123,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.991716,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025764522,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007496408,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.87944037},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405422013","doi":"10.1590/1807-3107bor-2024.vol38.0135","title":"Perceptions of research integrity and open science practices: a survey of Brazilian dental researchers","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Brazilian Oral Research","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ottawa Hospital","funders":"","keywords":"Survey research; Dental research; Research integrity; Perception; MEDLINE; Psychology; Medicine; Dentistry; Applied psychology; Engineering ethics; Political science; Engineering","score_opus":0.44322168356972663,"score_gpt":0.5992148976080401,"score_spread":0.1559932140383135,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405422013","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9939516,0.0011609376,0.0002872919,0.0016727669,0.00001828445,0.000060634808,0.000050059534,0.0000045521188,0.0027937908],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980507,0.00090734585,0.00039639533,0.00029290223,0.000015557129,0.000037934795,0.000032559376,0.0000025261552,0.00026411616],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9832001,0.009705116,0.0014889326,0.0005036706,0.0041264486,0.0009757584],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93651706,0.025598915,0.020303698,0.0026174085,0.009750307,0.005212651],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","open_science","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.023037553,0.0002605551,0.000732814,0.002250046,0.0018837568,0.002276853,0.0005272919,0.0009473902,0.0014030434],"category_scores_gemma":[0.059227996,0.00040614154,0.0004960149,0.0022018913,0.0022961274,0.0013632138,0.0022852742,0.000954779,0.00019495492],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001691759,0.00038137246,0.7374963,0.00059534103,0.00008357166,0.00035537808,0.21277341,0.00007558052,0.0022736043,0.0011742898,0.001046417,0.04357565],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000047517315,0.0007031554,0.61671525,0.0006243568,0.00009121911,0.0009058242,0.3641546,0.0003599929,0.00058281736,0.0008784843,0.014851687,0.00008507837],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0092720855,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008541338,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99947274,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016369902,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036639872,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12183571},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405484918","doi":"10.5430/wjel.v15n2p275","title":"Hedging in Medical Articles from Two Pandemics","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Journal of English Language","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Pandemic; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Computer science; Medicine; Infectious disease (medical specialty)","score_opus":0.013829287423867206,"score_gpt":0.31753482150951245,"score_spread":0.30370553408564527,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405484918","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9076916,0.04710264,0.005569606,0.011152058,0.0014772463,0.0004611658,0.0033987279,0.0001307699,0.023016075],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9674901,0.0152527355,0.009361316,0.0019436965,0.0009877469,0.00036497298,0.0023466211,0.000111058536,0.0021418233],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98187757,0.009240579,0.0035704663,0.0010855304,0.003804486,0.000421431],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.74880713,0.2123388,0.02269848,0.004828768,0.010297923,0.0010287543],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016556825,0.00040075489,0.00066658255,0.02086852,0.0031830117,0.00517337,0.00069273246,0.0012574681,0.0027397],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11257213,0.00036360585,0.00054182333,0.020267626,0.0038293279,0.004665167,0.004063145,0.0010431182,0.0003226133],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010697874,0.00014376019,0.053929955,0.028377809,0.00043832406,0.0062952028,0.5835945,0.0005343928,0.008508325,0.021022739,0.017694362,0.27839082],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000083015606,0.0003679138,0.21337818,0.031135961,0.00075446966,0.0061011817,0.35927206,0.00121018,0.010710357,0.01884254,0.35786447,0.00027970888],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011694719,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026968431,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9834432,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024289086,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027181623,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.087561905},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405514026","doi":"10.58932/mula0015","title":"Addressing Contract Cheating in Pakistani Higher Education: Strategies for Upholding Academic Integrity","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Professional Research in Social Sciences","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Academic integrity; Cheating; Higher education; Political science; Business; Sociology; Mathematics education; Engineering ethics; Psychology; Law; Social psychology; Engineering","score_opus":0.5881953374734454,"score_gpt":0.6362940496336518,"score_spread":0.048098712160206336,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405514026","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.76643413,0.00234382,0.028714394,0.10559415,0.00046981708,0.0008816177,0.000027626798,0.0002609393,0.09527348],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98999596,0.0005389441,0.004289162,0.0022588873,0.00006105134,0.00008515938,0.000009804192,0.0000098651,0.0027511937],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98215187,0.011448429,0.0006716235,0.0006691442,0.0021181211,0.0029409204],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9542355,0.019259088,0.010003696,0.0024874324,0.0051502963,0.008863932],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01775175,0.00047933517,0.00036698868,0.001461359,0.017560136,0.00977362,0.0023442518,0.0038218778,0.0046584653],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03687087,0.00034686184,0.0004164004,0.001478183,0.0073462995,0.006085189,0.012116853,0.0050880834,0.000609945],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001964992,0.0017135917,0.09022062,0.0008013953,0.0000988453,0.0027266478,0.31023523,0.0014721161,0.004770907,0.08234248,0.027329799,0.4780919],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008585011,0.0012048541,0.05264798,0.0014146348,0.00010287551,0.001280776,0.68305033,0.0051541687,0.004842526,0.048315767,0.20169565,0.00020460994],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006019803,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00732246,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99617815,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006293306,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.028483616,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09388137},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406468638","doi":"10.1145/3703465.3703472","title":"Is Crowdsourcing a Puppet Show? Detecting a New Type of Fraud in Online Platforms","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ontario Tech University","funders":"","keywords":"Crowdsourcing; Computer science; Data science; Computer security; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.07863912872982688,"score_gpt":0.37099151265907343,"score_spread":0.29235238392924656,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406468638","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89263767,0.002282426,0.041292477,0.027893992,0.00064742356,0.00077992334,0.0025164026,0.0007784234,0.031171316],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9831134,0.00043548006,0.010688175,0.002314342,0.0001937746,0.00018028496,0.00052596495,0.000078627236,0.0024699252],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.96319413,0.017129999,0.002263329,0.0043336167,0.011514221,0.001564668],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.79490536,0.086939186,0.061644994,0.033910297,0.019442344,0.003157884],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.025379602,0.00065347826,0.0008198133,0.0046928073,0.0031776861,0.00480529,0.0023827776,0.003011304,0.002938072],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1475799,0.0005496502,0.0006448138,0.004645551,0.0044403602,0.007366003,0.0034466295,0.0024623815,0.001211112],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00074599753,0.00024410742,0.7345284,0.0013353225,0.0003887667,0.0040397556,0.040302355,0.001555635,0.006209504,0.019975038,0.025780134,0.16489501],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011530388,0.00061539083,0.6349985,0.003071536,0.00045091964,0.008576244,0.06582066,0.044663306,0.013896262,0.053273804,0.17410879,0.0004092738],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007992024,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009248515,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9969887,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020923563,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001831613,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13422173},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406738886","doi":"10.31222/osf.io/cn6jf","title":"Preregistration of Research on Research Integrity is still Not Common: Findings from the Hong Kong, Cape Town, and Athens Editions of the World Conference on Research Integrity","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Women's College Research Institute","keywords":"Cape; Research integrity; Structural integrity; Geography; History; Engineering; Engineering ethics; Archaeology","score_opus":0.42914009343257653,"score_gpt":0.5009407905739112,"score_spread":0.07180069714133464,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406738886","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"reproducibility","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"reproducibility","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9868679,0.0048854523,0.00029835518,0.004004065,0.000111109206,0.00019694926,0.00042455562,0.000019233676,0.0031923496],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966017,0.0015361564,0.00030138504,0.0006258764,0.00008245618,0.00011103323,0.00026237575,0.000024389625,0.0004546503],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.8730999,0.052904215,0.03245115,0.0071543697,0.027359951,0.007030369],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.39749497,0.2344351,0.2636305,0.045497186,0.039639898,0.019302336],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.13080557,0.0005067808,0.0011080201,0.005984076,0.0039487304,0.0072699697,0.0033712042,0.0017608268,0.0030541746],"category_scores_gemma":[0.3714141,0.0009154345,0.0013896961,0.009122306,0.0059582186,0.0063803834,0.008884896,0.0027976779,0.00044317413],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00048956973,0.00010893868,0.86243546,0.0022414746,0.0002573001,0.0006204946,0.10055678,0.00007725041,0.00063036155,0.0010090707,0.00254164,0.029031517],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009863946,0.00014604845,0.94565076,0.0012501047,0.00004587561,0.00033497077,0.047531348,0.000074391144,0.00024105719,0.00013068385,0.0045482116,0.00003654448],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.038767163,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.040309582,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99823916,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0072590513,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018617166,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.69177425},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"domain":"reproducibility","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"domain":"reproducibility","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W4406842793","doi":"10.1038/d41586-025-00212-1","title":"‘Stamp out paper mills’ — science sleuths on how to fight fake research","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Nature","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":50,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Bishop's University","funders":"","keywords":"Scientific misconduct; Spotting; Misconduct; Engineering ethics; Political science; Engineering; Computer science; Law; Medicine; Alternative medicine","score_opus":0.04031818940135897,"score_gpt":0.42280289074556415,"score_spread":0.3824847013442052,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406842793","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004635374,0.019894684,0.09712058,0.73849064,0.025780063,0.0004792203,0.00015077465,0.0016693962,0.111779265],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.17273061,0.038454026,0.22418319,0.35668415,0.013138269,0.000927197,0.00035182614,0.0012264823,0.19230424],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9753128,0.009321358,0.0016296125,0.0016874576,0.010298703,0.001750004],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.90171057,0.04290199,0.0058718855,0.015200129,0.025270186,0.009045264],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.040294807,0.0019200881,0.0012378998,0.0040872837,0.009985729,0.019777153,0.004507045,0.019989977,0.02439179],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0921428,0.0011678059,0.0015805591,0.0015714691,0.033452045,0.030156175,0.009606544,0.02338308,0.018510345],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015291203,0.00023192189,0.0013168693,0.0007082858,0.00010873947,0.00052040664,0.0037508626,0.0005666621,0.0021979783,0.29502892,0.47894704,0.21646935],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007221006,0.00024616258,0.0007936625,0.0010057541,0.0000419792,0.0007209532,0.0034287907,0.0005972155,0.0024904632,0.28357503,0.70685685,0.00017092162],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022531375,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0037335255,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98001003,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032533074,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0129829245,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21310186},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"qualitative","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["research_integrity","scholarly_communication"],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"commentary","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W4406926026","doi":"10.33423/jabe.v27i1.7498","title":"Exam Proctoring in Online Business Education: Empirical Insights and Strategic Recommendations","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Business and Economics","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Medical education; Business; Psychology; Medicine","score_opus":0.045800548212874694,"score_gpt":0.3279552493490168,"score_spread":0.2821547011361421,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406926026","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92571396,0.0056229685,0.0031544522,0.044193953,0.00018842104,0.00026421275,0.00060615665,0.00004902322,0.020206919],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.993622,0.0028845137,0.00172666,0.00055044895,0.00011395863,0.00005283657,0.00022458124,0.00001087891,0.00081418763],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98444414,0.010038173,0.0008746291,0.0008874385,0.002568007,0.001187649],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.67336404,0.26029846,0.027266221,0.0054413816,0.023739818,0.009890015],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.025623215,0.00096384535,0.0010181682,0.0036674822,0.0025031,0.009993948,0.0026130464,0.002318833,0.00909995],"category_scores_gemma":[0.111155644,0.0005820997,0.0006260402,0.006252798,0.0029127973,0.010189832,0.0024645762,0.0040864297,0.001387621],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027933452,0.003406222,0.8258524,0.0007849645,0.00016083293,0.0006053799,0.00698036,0.001650385,0.00029613316,0.015041373,0.0062461216,0.13869652],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000077004115,0.0009525708,0.7996174,0.0030080236,0.00049588556,0.00025058235,0.1453886,0.02032272,0.001361734,0.018896753,0.009483306,0.0001454495],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016628845,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03112646,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99768114,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003100518,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009514393,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13551015},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407348901","doi":"10.1002/ase.70002","title":"Legal and ethical considerations around the use of existing illustrations to generate new illustrations in the anatomical sciences","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Anatomical Sciences Education","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Publication; Fair use; Publishing; Copyright law; Copyright infringement; Law; Generative grammar; Computer science; Engineering ethics; Sociology; Intellectual property; Political science; Artificial intelligence; Engineering","score_opus":0.2480167885842012,"score_gpt":0.4640803359025141,"score_spread":0.21606354731831287,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407348901","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011052715,0.00869449,0.03484576,0.5783562,0.0068702055,0.0006790337,0.00014807667,0.0005640269,0.35878944],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.37392747,0.014222846,0.10127485,0.26257265,0.011730595,0.0030126898,0.00032606427,0.001314581,0.23161823],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.7617468,0.16091472,0.015712963,0.0053696106,0.05124356,0.0050124023],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.57448095,0.3133113,0.01705834,0.04534743,0.042174213,0.007627703],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.12914239,0.0006754678,0.0011930043,0.0019324631,0.009527533,0.027096404,0.004774307,0.02394049,0.01670663],"category_scores_gemma":[0.36376753,0.0010246148,0.001028987,0.002097078,0.037539687,0.014858519,0.011503529,0.021346666,0.014470445],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000087804765,0.000105674546,0.00090467103,0.000582333,0.000021725658,0.0017622674,0.058287896,0.00046164228,0.0016764161,0.64041895,0.19472608,0.100964665],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002914847,0.00006620159,0.00074337714,0.0029907941,0.000020524301,0.0024841514,0.014400939,0.00083507237,0.0015340263,0.14543647,0.8313652,0.00009398435],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015652664,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027313551,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9760595,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004615374,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015562879,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6829784},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407926451","doi":"10.5539/hes.v15n1p331","title":"Reviewer Acknowledgements for Higher Education Studies, Vol. 15, No. 1","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Higher Education Studies","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematics education; Higher education; Psychology; Pedagogy; Medical education; Political science; Medicine","score_opus":0.08371433978053175,"score_gpt":0.44321332021686577,"score_spread":0.359498980436334,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407926451","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00016493732,0.0049515516,0.0019031852,0.115966044,0.8675588,0.00087914907,0.00058370276,0.00057124527,0.0074214432],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.010023985,0.015189112,0.008438889,0.13394056,0.68789464,0.0056201364,0.002562126,0.0029205377,0.13341008],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9102967,0.022208413,0.01619208,0.0062770606,0.042161487,0.0028643287],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.22338957,0.043420583,0.021472877,0.01493051,0.68065566,0.016130826],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06722682,0.0031849078,0.0043584444,0.0134076765,0.0066081085,0.016679151,0.0054948665,0.00848548,0.106806315],"category_scores_gemma":[0.4920519,0.0012913961,0.003235359,0.007850899,0.0030826572,0.009241404,0.0054831346,0.009936831,0.06922708],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016923676,0.0000050477056,0.00009980051,0.00037908086,0.00000878415,0.00003678455,0.000116709896,0.0000083686755,0.000030833606,0.00041563765,0.9881936,0.01068848],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024459527,0.000018581104,0.00038232756,0.0015492917,0.000023747083,0.00023303936,0.00041344672,0.00007825555,0.000069398186,0.0009391603,0.9962329,0.000035446443],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017813304,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028896334,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.106806315,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006995818,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018381683,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35730273},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407985303","doi":"10.5539/hes.v15n1p371","title":"Reviewer Acknowledgements for Higher Education Studies, Vol. 15, No. 1","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Higher Education Studies","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Higher education; Mathematics education; Psychology; Pedagogy; Library science; Medical education; Political science; Computer science; Medicine","score_opus":0.08371433978053175,"score_gpt":0.44321332021686577,"score_spread":0.359498980436334,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407985303","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00016493732,0.0049515516,0.0019031852,0.115966044,0.8675588,0.00087914907,0.00058370276,0.00057124527,0.0074214432],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.010023985,0.015189112,0.008438889,0.13394056,0.68789464,0.0056201364,0.002562126,0.0029205377,0.13341008],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9102967,0.022208413,0.01619208,0.0062770606,0.042161487,0.0028643287],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.22338957,0.043420583,0.021472877,0.01493051,0.68065566,0.016130826],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06722682,0.0031849078,0.0043584444,0.0134076765,0.0066081085,0.016679151,0.0054948665,0.00848548,0.106806315],"category_scores_gemma":[0.4920519,0.0012913961,0.003235359,0.007850899,0.0030826572,0.009241404,0.0054831346,0.009936831,0.06922708],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016923676,0.0000050477056,0.00009980051,0.00037908086,0.00000878415,0.00003678455,0.000116709896,0.0000083686755,0.000030833606,0.00041563765,0.9881936,0.01068848],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024459527,0.000018581104,0.00038232756,0.0015492917,0.000023747083,0.00023303936,0.00041344672,0.00007825555,0.000069398186,0.0009391603,0.9962329,0.000035446443],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017813304,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028896334,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.106806315,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006995818,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018381683,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35730273},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408037357","doi":"10.1177/01492063251315701","title":"Women’s and Men’s Authorship Experiences: A Prospective Meta-Analysis","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Management","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"Kelley School of Business, Indiana University","keywords":"Psychology; Meta-analysis; Sociology; Medicine","score_opus":0.047216195743370507,"score_gpt":0.33767809315354885,"score_spread":0.29046189741017836,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408037357","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.30467838,0.68151164,0.005983622,0.0019390485,0.0007998697,0.00040174188,0.0022894011,0.00005964618,0.002336686],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9692331,0.026691936,0.0019027626,0.0008310569,0.00016910832,0.00029182844,0.00054433657,0.00003422765,0.00030163268],"study_design_codex":"meta_analysis","study_design_gemma":"meta_analysis","domain_scores_codex":[0.9712246,0.018753946,0.005259684,0.0024325252,0.0017957067,0.0005334055],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8971604,0.078899205,0.011946609,0.0067733414,0.004232207,0.0009881798],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_broad"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03528348,0.00082644937,0.0028740144,0.002360241,0.00082219247,0.0029342794,0.0010869276,0.0013995683,0.002633344],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08610496,0.00068500056,0.0135539295,0.0037716634,0.00084041513,0.0016252495,0.0010663307,0.0013329599,0.00027760715],"study_design_candidate":"meta_analysis","study_design_consensus":"meta_analysis","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0060064816,0.000113484864,0.2805331,0.04373311,0.64145386,0.0003967213,0.0015468806,0.00030801672,0.0004983111,0.00065508665,0.0019016397,0.022853255],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011233134,0.0013615342,0.15274096,0.014643625,0.8175668,0.000652958,0.0013453274,0.00047953636,0.0008643938,0.0016991511,0.0074267206,0.00009567114],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002309951,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0050461874,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.997126,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00082051125,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014150167,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18659908},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408083851","doi":"10.1007/s40979-025-00182-x","title":"Understanding PSE students’ reactions to the postplagiarism concept: a quantitative analysis","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal for Educational Integrity","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Mathematics education; Psychology","score_opus":0.14830328600280315,"score_gpt":0.4923651865432522,"score_spread":0.34406190054044905,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408083851","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99618393,0.000050955445,0.0008804821,0.00055723265,0.000014375085,0.00006475445,0.0000559436,0.000019197796,0.0021732121],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973852,0.000085034684,0.00047266507,0.00023321681,0.000013037756,0.00015813441,0.00007296022,0.000016680951,0.0015629731],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9873754,0.005448926,0.0009359069,0.0007712339,0.003937038,0.0015315381],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93060887,0.031385455,0.015021413,0.0031390064,0.014761304,0.0050839493],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01553133,0.00038143076,0.0006605696,0.003118607,0.003510686,0.005056869,0.0011376586,0.0013246835,0.0044900444],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06958569,0.0003336892,0.0004868952,0.0020792305,0.003929218,0.0036434068,0.0060739657,0.00328361,0.0011867055],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021171448,0.00073291326,0.25969857,0.000310206,0.000038873703,0.00042342814,0.66386867,0.00017333751,0.0038271463,0.002168263,0.002023485,0.06652343],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001750345,0.0005503282,0.2653922,0.00018896117,0.000021398684,0.00039512268,0.7097009,0.0007635752,0.0030903616,0.0016979331,0.0180894,0.000092232156],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012132626,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016084657,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9986753,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002381997,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030404776,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08213854},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["research_integrity"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["research_integrity"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W4408464518","doi":"10.1080/08989621.2025.2470860","title":"Mapping nine decades of research integrity studies (1935–2024): A scientometric analysis","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Accountability in Research","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Research integrity; Engineering ethics; Engineering","score_opus":0.45889575399146626,"score_gpt":0.6163961553527757,"score_spread":0.15750040136130944,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408464518","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7906626,0.062790684,0.009395709,0.011290915,0.0006641604,0.0007159944,0.06894974,0.00031324045,0.055217095],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9392976,0.020800894,0.006489511,0.00065203273,0.0006320001,0.0006560471,0.027807284,0.00014838921,0.0035162857],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9810284,0.0037663025,0.00419657,0.001842257,0.007979454,0.0011870045],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8521641,0.06005882,0.037421536,0.009957867,0.036576934,0.0038207876],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.029420033,0.0004603456,0.0010599772,0.097039685,0.0022387784,0.00725117,0.0012011634,0.001168768,0.003950543],"category_scores_gemma":[0.101812616,0.0003863191,0.0016024855,0.14952053,0.0020152817,0.007236264,0.0055830427,0.0013451915,0.001332357],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00040201607,0.00014035185,0.58181363,0.0074529075,0.0011157447,0.0009984627,0.022838328,0.0026410115,0.0009976889,0.027332222,0.03522958,0.319038],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018251716,0.00015401158,0.7743363,0.0034310678,0.00033612282,0.0006731211,0.014112789,0.0019461066,0.0012525769,0.00536345,0.19827369,0.00010252223],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017138178,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013051926,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9988312,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006067466,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009224789,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15558988},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408604286","doi":"10.1007/s40979-025-00187-6","title":"Global Trends in Education: Artificial Intelligence, Postplagiarism, and Future-focused Learning for 2025 and Beyond – 2024–2025 Werklund Distinguished Research Lecture","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal for Educational Integrity","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Sociology; Artificial intelligence; Computer science","score_opus":0.05784685763756196,"score_gpt":0.46495662347644307,"score_spread":0.4071097658388811,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408604286","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006918515,0.060680676,0.0017035485,0.8130928,0.018293377,0.00002759905,0.0002089692,0.00017338103,0.09890111],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.417197,0.098748595,0.005898543,0.16477287,0.019137945,0.00021997432,0.0012236546,0.00052585674,0.2922756],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9948344,0.0018641201,0.00022513508,0.00038482016,0.0013340292,0.0013575258],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99120164,0.0020332732,0.0007416061,0.0004723036,0.0018367841,0.003714396],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007913417,0.00058996544,0.00052444363,0.0021658775,0.0047976,0.01324825,0.0010030565,0.006024507,0.02760856],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0124630565,0.00022367854,0.00045021667,0.0021764943,0.007761168,0.015556824,0.00827062,0.008931529,0.0051668976],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000040627867,0.000078799356,0.0025278216,0.0002504193,0.000012064112,0.00016960855,0.0076413904,0.000113301525,0.00018655784,0.17824943,0.5772898,0.2334401],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003669495,0.000031681226,0.00235085,0.00061770744,0.0000033410624,0.00011670004,0.0070804097,0.00007045868,0.000161218,0.028458564,0.96108806,0.000017268072],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004261829,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007976671,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9939755,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010705508,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011394374,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0923599},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409262732","doi":"10.1007/s40979-025-00188-5","title":"Academic and clinical integrity: undergraduate nursing students’ perceptions","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal for Educational Integrity","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"Qatar National Library","keywords":"Academic integrity; Perception; Psychology; Medical education; Nursing; Medicine; Social psychology","score_opus":0.08083098191398605,"score_gpt":0.5290195315625424,"score_spread":0.44818854964855637,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409262732","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9933342,0.00032198697,0.00022495897,0.002391311,0.000057464655,0.000026383836,0.0000150468395,0.000008094774,0.0036204746],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998257,0.00017734688,0.00009199916,0.0005261261,0.0000150652295,0.000013501539,0.000008104048,0.0000022021368,0.0009086432],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99377465,0.0025632447,0.00042378463,0.00030011192,0.0018048158,0.001133382],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98344237,0.0037851417,0.0028150321,0.00041545348,0.0032517756,0.0062901773],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0071167136,0.0002159733,0.00046295606,0.00077222165,0.004652325,0.0045632017,0.0006609011,0.0012939305,0.006136489],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017804215,0.0002182098,0.00030980018,0.0006597118,0.004463279,0.0018407212,0.0052209357,0.0024011494,0.00060719793],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009462085,0.0006054215,0.21009122,0.0003074587,0.000030471085,0.0009832871,0.737469,0.000126759,0.002189205,0.0032378554,0.0040290747,0.040835597],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010586162,0.00057731004,0.07064687,0.00029742834,0.000018251396,0.0009116169,0.90813714,0.0002405407,0.0008228511,0.0010389519,0.01724955,0.00004899284],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0039277626,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004969962,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99870604,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002464207,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0053239823,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.037637234},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409370930","doi":"10.1038/s41562-025-02154-0","title":"Characterizing the effect of retractions on publishing careers","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Nature Human Behaviour","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"York University; New York University Abu Dhabi","keywords":"Publishing; Psychology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.014387769011394255,"score_gpt":0.3364968878199576,"score_spread":0.32210911880856335,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409370930","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91804916,0.013692151,0.0074142027,0.0070583094,0.0012470804,0.00021141916,0.032749496,0.0011718936,0.018406225],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95112634,0.0042549493,0.004781218,0.0006577193,0.0010288187,0.00021486207,0.027621575,0.00044134288,0.009873076],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.97106636,0.0077994005,0.005514673,0.0039660065,0.009708847,0.0019447659],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.5648578,0.23646091,0.11842341,0.034789216,0.03401435,0.011454355],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.027736863,0.00066965993,0.0010344209,0.012827232,0.0019140681,0.005233169,0.001737131,0.001473388,0.008745872],"category_scores_gemma":[0.27408075,0.00036196355,0.0012753214,0.017417993,0.0016984249,0.0046374286,0.0035769274,0.002693197,0.006273935],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00077918783,0.000169949,0.83369076,0.0016805732,0.0006263739,0.0005570825,0.0036560956,0.0019579814,0.0019745522,0.004608307,0.032235183,0.11806391],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007316435,0.000404093,0.9060738,0.00059762696,0.00032509892,0.0011665492,0.0035089361,0.0038396502,0.0024711958,0.0074686627,0.07392739,0.000143905],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029896537,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0050398586,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99852663,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014037866,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002831182,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14668828},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"domain":"incentives","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"domain":"incentives","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W4409526889","doi":"10.5430/wjel.v15n5p220","title":"Unveiling Indonesian Higher Education Students’ English Academic Writing Misconduct in The Era of Technology &amp; AI: Comprehension vs Practice","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Journal of English Language","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indonesian; Misconduct; Comprehension; Mathematics education; Computer science; Psychology; Political science; Law; Linguistics; Philosophy; Programming language","score_opus":0.016704045854867306,"score_gpt":0.36173818348348874,"score_spread":0.34503413762862145,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409526889","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99603385,0.000102566264,0.0003048206,0.00062460324,0.000008062799,0.000013060459,0.000007572508,0.000005283877,0.0029001539],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986173,0.00013600646,0.0002304693,0.00011084889,0.000004460658,0.000009437559,0.000006595431,0.000004156593,0.00088078075],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99575716,0.0018222011,0.00042634364,0.00026478415,0.0012487846,0.0004807086],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97860855,0.009473733,0.0057923263,0.0009358072,0.0035510785,0.0016384504],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007091088,0.00029947783,0.0003790469,0.0015326579,0.0036642551,0.0062618474,0.0009082759,0.0008994692,0.0018706778],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022092605,0.00030711497,0.00023205871,0.0011123662,0.003398146,0.0036767197,0.0039741,0.0024804235,0.00049887266],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000454677,0.00034206017,0.10515852,0.00017683727,0.000009030943,0.0009877,0.84567475,0.000088854096,0.002187533,0.0019545376,0.00087107625,0.04250361],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005069792,0.00019668118,0.091321744,0.0003300094,0.00001946271,0.0008799823,0.88900673,0.00075974764,0.0038239507,0.0021059066,0.011504282,0.000046336772],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019770854,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0037564056,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9991005,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019737412,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036493803,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.037501693},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409776768","doi":"10.1136/bmj-2024-082068","title":"Investigating the impact of trial retractions on the healthcare evidence ecosystem (VITALITY Study I): retrospective cohort study","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"BMJ","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Confidence interval; Medicine; Retrospective cohort study; Odds ratio; Clinical trial; MEDLINE; Citation; Evidence-based medicine; Meta-analysis; Scopus; Cohort study; Statistical significance; Publication bias; Clinical study design; Alternative medicine; Internal medicine; Computer science; Pathology; Library science","score_opus":0.10991537025429995,"score_gpt":0.46000333491442535,"score_spread":0.3500879646601254,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409776768","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.29592928,0.5459758,0.05261251,0.015837448,0.0047381595,0.032730423,0.04112745,0.00043438058,0.010614506],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87122416,0.04112507,0.026436834,0.008395856,0.0021650554,0.033491634,0.013714574,0.00045678878,0.0029900812],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.68644994,0.14730081,0.106827565,0.017912742,0.037444647,0.0040643043],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.25101742,0.41511643,0.2199032,0.074891664,0.036518913,0.002552381],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.30074015,0.002414292,0.005642355,0.009401845,0.002085744,0.00685997,0.0036152108,0.00405471,0.0100156125],"category_scores_gemma":[0.6374325,0.0024117024,0.014330031,0.010869181,0.002393412,0.006861279,0.0057533826,0.0038838987,0.0023045714],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.03193592,0.00075921323,0.41078126,0.21747842,0.14101946,0.0023403151,0.0049847364,0.0027676902,0.0017904188,0.010635468,0.028414786,0.1470923],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.012137352,0.011271945,0.36514768,0.20209154,0.26549208,0.005462986,0.0030191147,0.0043675615,0.0055029667,0.013800097,0.11078147,0.00092513143],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031161844,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003910726,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9959453,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038229653,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010730054,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8623119},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409873082","doi":"10.3138/jsp-2024-1115","title":"Deterring Academic Integrity Breaches: The Roles of Institutions, Academics, and Support Services","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Academic integrity; Business; Public relations; Political science; Engineering ethics; Engineering","score_opus":0.057431009558487456,"score_gpt":0.33924627141216374,"score_spread":0.2818152618536763,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409873082","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.36155677,0.017040327,0.01494801,0.3807404,0.0022713232,0.00051977474,0.00011008285,0.00044836145,0.22236496],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9683924,0.0049105715,0.0059850053,0.008531976,0.00033632523,0.0001389011,0.000039853447,0.00008206701,0.0115829],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.92887366,0.047496125,0.0031304804,0.001830955,0.008541522,0.01012732],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.88885397,0.034345467,0.013368509,0.0045776535,0.0155182015,0.043336257],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03873654,0.00056723785,0.0008759592,0.0037028103,0.02669958,0.038201712,0.0035946134,0.0071575586,0.011108988],"category_scores_gemma":[0.080497704,0.00064297806,0.00064064265,0.0036603403,0.020171583,0.016045619,0.030930204,0.008867272,0.0027448314],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000349277,0.0008650721,0.0642839,0.0020409103,0.00023926375,0.0028004623,0.3659626,0.00075985235,0.001296289,0.16043341,0.04433412,0.35663489],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000048012655,0.0005143655,0.023940468,0.0036080014,0.000089369336,0.002039106,0.64672583,0.0005131533,0.0008951713,0.029998042,0.2914469,0.00018153273],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009398488,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0149343135,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99284244,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011588675,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.059065066,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20486087},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409873136","doi":"10.3138/jsp-2024-1119","title":"Looking through the Assurance Lens: Institutional Governance of Academic Integrity Strategies","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Corporate governance; Lens (geology); Business; Through-the-lens metering; Academic integrity; Accounting; Process management; Engineering ethics; Engineering; Finance","score_opus":0.044758271758392455,"score_gpt":0.3312513709131979,"score_spread":0.2864930991548054,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409873136","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21768422,0.0033908465,0.22957076,0.10388469,0.00040364882,0.00079838216,0.00016675662,0.0004227253,0.44367793],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98417795,0.00047597426,0.011208333,0.0007429499,0.00005494464,0.0001069275,0.000022791899,0.000030445866,0.003179864],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.97365373,0.01797406,0.0012381827,0.0013637792,0.004114688,0.0016555962],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9282042,0.037001085,0.012931416,0.0074893488,0.010675822,0.0036982582],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.031098079,0.0005289357,0.00050060824,0.005435897,0.00614718,0.02200153,0.001649187,0.0035435641,0.006718215],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0703756,0.0004708976,0.0006174922,0.0036255403,0.02675122,0.02600297,0.010606921,0.006004034,0.0006631359],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025377396,0.000046860914,0.0072229668,0.000095180716,0.000022351136,0.00008003304,0.010053787,0.0012109241,0.00030987491,0.9565064,0.0010930119,0.023333205],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003470714,0.00024977798,0.015300772,0.0009412931,0.00006018564,0.00017088796,0.039075,0.005712109,0.0020253302,0.8792736,0.057050925,0.00010549249],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005755508,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00660761,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99645644,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014591914,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01771697,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16446435},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409873165","doi":"10.3138/jsp-2024-1114","title":"Promoting Academic Integrity through a ‘Pedagogy of Inquiry’","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Cape Breton University","funders":"","keywords":"Academic integrity; Pedagogy; Sociology; Mathematics education; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.08337221275963277,"score_gpt":0.4037724410125136,"score_spread":0.32040022825288084,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409873165","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07069936,0.0064780232,0.2588568,0.14694157,0.001627128,0.0004294465,0.00002760853,0.0008649754,0.5140751],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8717839,0.0044114133,0.08237278,0.0069066184,0.0006284656,0.00047821426,0.000031268417,0.00014030635,0.03324706],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9865671,0.009743327,0.00045065684,0.0006974626,0.0018401489,0.00070143124],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.979596,0.011858317,0.0023759205,0.002522619,0.0015729221,0.0020741692],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012590394,0.00041314473,0.0005190374,0.0022565082,0.0045244717,0.0115927225,0.0021452797,0.002917188,0.003061517],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017476898,0.00029469404,0.000766116,0.001232331,0.028825913,0.009647055,0.014419811,0.005097494,0.0012960364],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019745547,0.00026983183,0.0022244672,0.000340429,0.000012057864,0.00025178716,0.10881611,0.00031790367,0.0014069104,0.76721954,0.005070796,0.11405056],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000031680356,0.00025219863,0.0019723624,0.0009777795,0.000021537146,0.0008906907,0.051305484,0.0010606756,0.0021063134,0.5638218,0.3775124,0.00004717569],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00044166172,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010805889,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9970828,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002787049,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009416205,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06658518},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409873225","doi":"10.3138/jsp-2024-1124","title":"Leveraging Generative Artificial Intelligence with Transparency: Enhancing Academic Integrity in Higher Education","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec en Outaouais","funders":"","keywords":"Transparency (behavior); Generative grammar; Academic integrity; Artificial intelligence; Computer science; Mathematics education; Psychology; Engineering ethics; Engineering; Computer security","score_opus":0.0955611416544958,"score_gpt":0.3529809603280865,"score_spread":0.2574198186735907,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409873225","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15069428,0.0009902974,0.6842378,0.018413844,0.0003370251,0.00029239108,0.000049441205,0.0037205687,0.1412644],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87268436,0.00036368362,0.117553405,0.0009829733,0.00009690552,0.0001091283,0.000044298886,0.00043415127,0.007731185],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.96139324,0.029034948,0.0012547745,0.0012110899,0.0059155873,0.0011904197],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.87027675,0.07962361,0.008782708,0.0338401,0.00481744,0.0026593548],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.029749757,0.0005048624,0.00040576386,0.002467572,0.0033301013,0.013747279,0.0022272896,0.0023874512,0.004282749],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09727069,0.0005647054,0.00063520635,0.002587941,0.015406286,0.014020756,0.015030998,0.0043509356,0.0013592299],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015049223,0.00030548952,0.009515204,0.00044263437,0.000040932944,0.0006425789,0.107252985,0.0058890735,0.00612497,0.54948413,0.0045672148,0.31558415],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008083555,0.0003402233,0.004768259,0.0011374722,0.00007243772,0.0013062805,0.018923001,0.03333653,0.024094198,0.75860757,0.15712601,0.0002072147],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008923142,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013071109,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99761254,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002484183,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00503797,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15733361},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409873242","doi":"10.3138/jsp-2024-1113","title":"Autonomy, Integrity, and Academic Integrity Support","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Cape Breton University","funders":"","keywords":"Academic integrity; Autonomy; Data integrity; Territorial integrity; Structural integrity; Scientific integrity; Personal Integrity; Research integrity; Business; Computer science; Political science; Computer security; Engineering ethics; Psychology; Engineering; Public relations; Social psychology; Law; Library science; Politics","score_opus":0.05512154170556225,"score_gpt":0.3527725967982754,"score_spread":0.2976510550927131,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409873242","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.61600256,0.0014187391,0.004256471,0.039622933,0.00015669086,0.000049662867,0.00003437013,0.000037135513,0.33842146],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970958,0.00016877666,0.00027488795,0.00021896904,0.000030587235,0.000007529434,0.0000050727995,0.0000024265344,0.0021960137],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99424547,0.0032814757,0.00024737077,0.0003052117,0.0012051825,0.000715357],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9813323,0.0057597873,0.00450218,0.0013169664,0.0016146036,0.005474258],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003343512,0.00017884355,0.00021491438,0.0011685449,0.004443483,0.00728309,0.0008658403,0.0017004901,0.0042914404],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01652187,0.00012588105,0.00022137207,0.0008583888,0.01792981,0.004558125,0.007951039,0.0026199962,0.00044361307],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001062508,0.00038931478,0.046733707,0.00011637683,0.000033497512,0.0007552392,0.10481329,0.0004401467,0.00085183105,0.77510095,0.004149714,0.06650969],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010219049,0.00051725406,0.06230856,0.00039874468,0.00004493019,0.001402714,0.10416037,0.0015840515,0.0016430651,0.7075203,0.12023551,0.00008223235],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016439664,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017642799,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99829954,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002384,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0043602246,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.017682374},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409903211","doi":"10.3138/jsp-2024-1116","title":"Understanding Academic Integrity at the University of Rijeka: How Student-Oriented Is It?","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Academic integrity; Structural integrity; Research integrity; Data integrity; Mathematics education; Psychology; Computer science; Engineering ethics; Engineering; Social psychology; Computer security","score_opus":0.12116266544815853,"score_gpt":0.33930084898062013,"score_spread":0.21813818353246162,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409903211","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9081172,0.0022061856,0.0025745346,0.030444078,0.00011970649,0.000053899417,0.000029498495,0.000024056968,0.05643092],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99747086,0.000569528,0.00026706277,0.00056657364,0.000016518577,0.000007884862,0.000009847283,0.000004024171,0.0010876782],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9867937,0.00889057,0.00045214992,0.00053125364,0.0017171924,0.0016150865],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9733373,0.010125971,0.006344765,0.0010208022,0.0039727,0.005198518],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013416188,0.00020240156,0.00045955816,0.0022095954,0.0075586895,0.016023245,0.0015485361,0.0024374272,0.002557611],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025570102,0.00023850666,0.00035772982,0.0023170488,0.010269634,0.0120327985,0.0054100575,0.0039482787,0.0005446613],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005040777,0.00033734197,0.1237377,0.0002696414,0.00004504162,0.0004011322,0.76349384,0.0002730783,0.00046214304,0.044104613,0.00372259,0.06310255],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003947168,0.000074816315,0.047977332,0.00027670516,0.000017299582,0.00022396901,0.9177517,0.00032197114,0.00024270004,0.0073508727,0.025727144,0.000031398537],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015666038,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017289568,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9975626,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006573572,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010067874,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.070952415},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409903227","doi":"10.3138/jsp-2024-1122","title":"GenAI and Academic Integrity: Redefining the Role of Writing Centres in a Shifting Digital Landscape","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Royal Military College of Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Academic integrity; Geography; Sociology; Architectural engineering; Engineering ethics; Engineering","score_opus":0.02266195009763907,"score_gpt":0.2934967210000999,"score_spread":0.27083477090246083,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409903227","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.47819948,0.006163787,0.03650608,0.093950935,0.000961538,0.00017185078,0.00006999409,0.00071588584,0.38326046],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98948777,0.00054324645,0.0034978157,0.0009991975,0.00010469407,0.000031042215,0.000014760815,0.00009061726,0.0052307984],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.968048,0.023541404,0.00096485094,0.0016940058,0.0034126355,0.0023392043],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.90787905,0.052611757,0.009509764,0.015287625,0.00551481,0.009196948],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.026326591,0.0005010859,0.00065563666,0.004558015,0.022506855,0.03701741,0.003510996,0.0040358114,0.008376749],"category_scores_gemma":[0.054864798,0.00048472066,0.00059601484,0.004293309,0.081672214,0.025488079,0.034966588,0.007905934,0.0015041485],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000075533484,0.000074758216,0.007838051,0.0002394792,0.000017999557,0.0005492927,0.516636,0.00037864165,0.0007685716,0.39896044,0.003094052,0.0713671],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000037682938,0.00016283648,0.0060968,0.0007488254,0.000027454194,0.0008581286,0.47395182,0.0010430389,0.002281049,0.25813416,0.25657472,0.00008339732],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022931122,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0036338575,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99596417,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008735341,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013391192,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13923001},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409903256","doi":"10.3138/jsp-2024-1117","title":"Attitudes Toward Academic Integrity: The Relationship Between Demographic Features, Peer Norms, Learning Profiles, Rates of Academic Misconduct, and Various Attitudes","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Misconduct; Academic integrity; Psychology; Social psychology; Research integrity; Peer review; Public relations; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.09570081193200937,"score_gpt":0.3752995323888215,"score_spread":0.27959872045681217,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409903256","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99879706,0.000056557772,0.00007030504,0.00012205021,0.000003632525,0.000009511242,0.00004412106,0.0000026642456,0.0008940448],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99947387,0.000039625535,0.000058628015,0.000021386406,0.000007178909,0.0000069062535,0.00005952612,0.0000012709202,0.00033156102],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977952,0.00094156555,0.00029759892,0.0001764997,0.0005676561,0.00022149825],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93392557,0.032940816,0.021795096,0.00201329,0.0033344452,0.005990776],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004597251,0.00022678894,0.00029827992,0.0017515528,0.00083678216,0.0018024258,0.0005887033,0.0009958982,0.0040488043],"category_scores_gemma":[0.034470383,0.00021319691,0.000578683,0.0014621698,0.0011416711,0.0016112092,0.001136714,0.0017866258,0.0005773456],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036127985,0.00016558156,0.9977514,0.0000042161128,0.00002755774,0.00001712361,0.00042504104,0.000028866194,0.00003745909,0.000036488964,0.00003165135,0.0014384639],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000030959154,0.00020787491,0.9970317,0.000009162795,0.000019396806,0.00012832771,0.0018413273,0.0003971025,0.00009331793,0.00012932926,0.00013271831,0.0000066210664],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020391927,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022880547,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9990041,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005093698,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00063790794,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.024312854},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"domain":"methods","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"},{"model":"gpt","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W4409940571","doi":"10.5040/9781666983142","title":"Academic Misconduct and Plagiarism","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Misconduct; Scientific misconduct; Academic integrity; Political science; Criminology; Psychology; Law; Social psychology; Medicine","score_opus":0.046706266696727256,"score_gpt":0.3143870360814521,"score_spread":0.26768076938472485,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409940571","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0031720502,0.0350643,0.0051604374,0.0766914,0.011934042,0.00008918703,0.00023809623,0.0005035536,0.86714697],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.08366861,0.041087303,0.004029668,0.02733439,0.015024469,0.000245041,0.00047204053,0.00090675306,0.82723176],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99442804,0.0020866557,0.00029206736,0.00036284837,0.0025138208,0.00031651533],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9833725,0.010574482,0.0013213584,0.00083847396,0.0032187176,0.0006744348],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021029036,0.0006434114,0.0006887206,0.0020842142,0.00482178,0.011166243,0.0017304462,0.0047507156,0.04056547],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012190721,0.0005870504,0.00065969635,0.0034956913,0.0072395327,0.00799205,0.003400081,0.0046041906,0.014969],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001903086,0.000033677155,0.000488745,0.000443808,0.000010384385,0.00022549901,0.0068831085,0.00022270188,0.00020388424,0.14324366,0.77666104,0.07156446],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002610181,0.000020416324,0.0009835756,0.0004951397,0.0000045703455,0.00046625145,0.0015110805,0.00017803995,0.00014423768,0.02130361,0.9748765,0.0000139201475],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037792658,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0071759783,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9952493,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037404078,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034360066,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.135705},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["research_integrity"],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"other","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["research_integrity"],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"other","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W4409987423","doi":"10.69520/jipe.v7i1.248","title":"An Innovative Approach to Health Sector Regulatory Compliance Education","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of innovation in polytechnic education.","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Humber Polytechnic","funders":"","keywords":"Compliance (psychology); Business; Psychology","score_opus":0.04244740614080407,"score_gpt":0.3988103426130308,"score_spread":0.3563629364722267,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409987423","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13769121,0.002925576,0.33731416,0.13422105,0.005571541,0.0032162098,0.000091663765,0.0020454493,0.37692323],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5278461,0.0027637996,0.3150323,0.04743518,0.0013340331,0.0017047863,0.00015088561,0.00019062453,0.10354227],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99006945,0.0049408027,0.0002507642,0.00085974584,0.0028574248,0.0010218467],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9949254,0.0024680272,0.00045230167,0.00047574873,0.00069903926,0.0009794306],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0072227353,0.00055238546,0.00020921754,0.001292623,0.0036594223,0.0063422355,0.0026373146,0.004434167,0.0070610098],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008416137,0.0003265279,0.00071226916,0.00082237145,0.0054048514,0.0035142275,0.009507265,0.0049900482,0.0012571776],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008563524,0.0048264875,0.004146681,0.00093923154,0.000047912752,0.0016272502,0.03736456,0.0028971562,0.008927755,0.23403433,0.06560881,0.63949424],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016336962,0.0016476791,0.0042612944,0.00078631524,0.000037991118,0.0030038417,0.023865042,0.004702569,0.007959499,0.07682801,0.87662995,0.00011438336],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014001897,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028899591,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0072227353,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00364773,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014909872,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.038197994},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410520192","doi":"10.1111/medu.15695","title":"Everybody hurts: The Reviewer‐Imposed Pain (RIP) matrix","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Medical Education","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University; University of Ottawa; McGill University Health Centre","funders":"","keywords":"Constructive; Matrix (chemical analysis); Set (abstract data type); Psychology; Statistician; Peer review; Process (computing); Computer science; Applied psychology; Medicine","score_opus":0.00943763667609486,"score_gpt":0.3712933571344811,"score_spread":0.3618557204583862,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410520192","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6477143,0.0049868445,0.23441158,0.028297404,0.0055359206,0.018714156,0.003450732,0.0019233106,0.054965746],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.75370485,0.0015048197,0.22608365,0.0024949107,0.0008943592,0.011484358,0.0007689196,0.00025750863,0.0028066908],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.69360644,0.18604462,0.03034021,0.006063356,0.081483506,0.002461879],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.35274982,0.4037123,0.078356504,0.02783056,0.12932573,0.008025057],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.16839013,0.00089398085,0.000917539,0.006654291,0.0035051021,0.007415993,0.0022833669,0.001110568,0.0030087365],"category_scores_gemma":[0.42916563,0.00084009406,0.0015006743,0.004424356,0.005402453,0.0057100262,0.008577704,0.0031628325,0.0009217155],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0016024539,0.0007375981,0.13817425,0.011000115,0.0011287034,0.00056526007,0.12426205,0.0018979171,0.009894871,0.020171804,0.05282651,0.63773847],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007711344,0.009879933,0.49277452,0.007918394,0.0015732798,0.0040754722,0.12643446,0.015554734,0.013557247,0.037166446,0.2881659,0.0021285824],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011583506,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0032280933,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83160985,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0048106224,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009756519,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.89054275},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410564618","doi":"10.3390/jrfm18050285","title":"Student and Practitioner Cheating: A Crisis for the Accounting Profession","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of risk and financial management","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cheating; Accounting; Psychology; Political science; Business; Social psychology","score_opus":0.01090610206613105,"score_gpt":0.32575464565596907,"score_spread":0.314848543589838,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410564618","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3537676,0.007508379,0.0065657683,0.59284633,0.0010525843,0.000040449733,0.000054801396,0.00013100404,0.038033053],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9520988,0.0027186237,0.0013138816,0.03743204,0.0008237534,0.000021981816,0.00002541673,0.000048307098,0.0055172127],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9773043,0.011626174,0.0011052028,0.0013222488,0.006687568,0.001954569],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9330102,0.032011397,0.014005212,0.0047931545,0.007524114,0.008655786],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016656844,0.00026833365,0.00056105986,0.0018701098,0.0076800957,0.011000667,0.0013053828,0.0070744553,0.004886639],"category_scores_gemma":[0.050497845,0.00036433226,0.0004286628,0.0018432129,0.0135831535,0.0136993965,0.0070473864,0.012514925,0.0008162168],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027489362,0.00033199904,0.07789454,0.0003805016,0.00005971989,0.0015919216,0.2281619,0.00048489438,0.0019139082,0.34555054,0.08205005,0.2613052],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007053059,0.0007424531,0.07177386,0.0014696246,0.000045714318,0.004897892,0.32328933,0.002792959,0.0017956857,0.230197,0.36262715,0.0002977885],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026845515,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00329022,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9929255,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005332041,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005979284,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0880909},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410718035","doi":"10.5539/hes.v15n2p437","title":"Reviewer Acknowledgements for Higher Education Studies, Vol. 15, No. 2","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Higher Education Studies","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Higher education; Mathematics education; Psychology; Medical education; Pedagogy; Political science; Medicine","score_opus":0.08075921625705644,"score_gpt":0.4424268396955746,"score_spread":0.36166762343851816,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410718035","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00017898837,0.004857258,0.0020912904,0.118158765,0.86451834,0.0008721509,0.0005338461,0.0006517295,0.008137608],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0107304035,0.014517889,0.008345882,0.14249387,0.65222067,0.0053357724,0.0022757363,0.0033805696,0.16069922],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.91329867,0.02143988,0.014737319,0.0058926702,0.04192593,0.002705507],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.25337732,0.039662026,0.019043492,0.015024225,0.6553863,0.017506642],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06614409,0.0032086174,0.0040955977,0.012289934,0.0064967773,0.017294405,0.0053177713,0.008164156,0.10636355],"category_scores_gemma":[0.46341702,0.0012923965,0.0031077066,0.0071551288,0.0031972374,0.009682727,0.005748439,0.0093424115,0.07099728],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016403972,0.0000047435624,0.000104744344,0.00034112635,0.000008806973,0.000037363883,0.00012448929,0.000007778993,0.000034948443,0.00040767578,0.98845357,0.010458365],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023911884,0.000017622171,0.00037216145,0.001301096,0.000022608054,0.00023336691,0.00044366886,0.00007537923,0.00007442334,0.0008927578,0.99650925,0.0000336886],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018394337,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002974604,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10636355,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006934861,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018184815,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35582155},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410785120","doi":"10.1093/9780199289011.003.0015","title":"Disclosure of Information to the Patent Offices1","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Business","score_opus":0.05068482964632685,"score_gpt":0.25464290631072684,"score_spread":0.2039580766644,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410785120","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0040338957,0.0112782335,0.005747194,0.007674415,0.0006691969,0.000067512665,0.0001444628,0.000092047005,0.970293],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.15129031,0.032915786,0.007590969,0.0052310545,0.0016947486,0.00015330699,0.000429402,0.00014066107,0.80055374],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973105,0.0006888821,0.00012379218,0.00024209196,0.0013874015,0.00024737278],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973181,0.0014740275,0.0002643659,0.0003766569,0.00046210032,0.000104744526],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019383295,0.0002940861,0.00027940667,0.0014213773,0.002226105,0.0064917095,0.000771237,0.0022068406,0.02274464],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0048864926,0.0002568967,0.00030623053,0.0021415846,0.0022671332,0.0040024463,0.002103456,0.0029081283,0.0072187525],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008044784,0.00003124348,0.00021882523,0.00012367291,0.0000024040605,0.00016163437,0.0024661534,0.00032346623,0.00058952515,0.7992026,0.07941713,0.117455296],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000020744912,0.00001463881,0.00024380528,0.000391014,0.0000027799022,0.00023760855,0.00032987748,0.00016881264,0.00080378825,0.047399808,0.9503967,0.00000912932],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021380058,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022301534,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02274464,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026150157,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0039059306,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07608837},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410864159","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-90742-5_5","title":"Detecting Deepfake: A Systematic Review","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Information systems engineering and management","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Yorkville University","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.015895760838842782,"score_gpt":0.28889093148466455,"score_spread":0.2729951706458218,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410864159","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0021361264,0.98976374,0.0014660653,0.0012777845,0.0004952325,0.0032171388,0.0011218042,0.000055372908,0.00046683726],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0538366,0.9245103,0.009862066,0.005427741,0.00034212766,0.004286385,0.0011382834,0.00007101118,0.0005255343],"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","domain_scores_codex":[0.9234301,0.030077852,0.028953986,0.004710912,0.011507198,0.0013200095],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.81925994,0.12506333,0.033115402,0.0068230317,0.014017066,0.0017212592],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06446049,0.0028822112,0.015267608,0.02218275,0.001865298,0.0065247184,0.0046048225,0.0059372494,0.006855949],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2465364,0.0026599208,0.012773376,0.015200929,0.003539312,0.008600183,0.007056027,0.003467173,0.00089194515],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":"systematic_review","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028263242,0.000024620098,0.0015828727,0.9437184,0.015711352,0.0001444862,0.000523098,0.00008173542,0.0001963682,0.00031516879,0.0028394368,0.034579776],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007069963,0.00018134125,0.0031399159,0.8807889,0.09826291,0.0002567522,0.0006571254,0.000135985,0.0002069018,0.00084336015,0.0147286635,0.00009108642],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007974425,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.042772025,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06446049,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006436873,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03170494,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34090376},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410960489","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-90091-4_10","title":"From Mega to Micro: Collaborative Strategies for Enhancing Academic Integrity in a College Nursing Program","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Ethics and integrity in educational contexts","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Portage College; Assiniboine Community College","funders":"","keywords":"Mega-; Academic integrity; Psychology; Medical education; Nursing; Business; Medicine; Engineering ethics; Engineering","score_opus":0.06450652900542904,"score_gpt":0.43182222396184544,"score_spread":0.3673156949564164,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410960489","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11476311,0.0031515057,0.06350542,0.040677432,0.0012719496,0.0003761407,0.000046661193,0.0006485028,0.77555925],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.58738554,0.0021567713,0.08249189,0.00571351,0.00033669145,0.0006212472,0.00007397872,0.0005012757,0.32071912],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977011,0.0013602561,0.000047832837,0.00016650636,0.00052889826,0.00019545383],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962179,0.0015200846,0.00026488493,0.00043260932,0.00037017648,0.0011943872],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030616187,0.00039956204,0.0002377844,0.00081444584,0.006611665,0.0070133535,0.0016586967,0.0013345344,0.011622433],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0060625426,0.00028889853,0.00025898262,0.0009168255,0.0030293453,0.0070240106,0.010394105,0.003917772,0.0020516894],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000045456243,0.00055619923,0.0030604908,0.00019661731,0.000016236821,0.00025884013,0.0932177,0.0004766716,0.0017004185,0.15489419,0.11524942,0.63032764],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000033067136,0.00043317262,0.007059972,0.000624131,0.000040326275,0.00084358634,0.18493918,0.0028231104,0.0028927282,0.12176966,0.6784885,0.000052586558],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021665362,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015750071,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99866545,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022776416,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009783585,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.038880885},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410960503","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-90091-4_3","title":"Building an Academic Integrity Plan: Our Journey at a Mid-Sized Polytechnic","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Ethics and integrity in educational contexts","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Red Deer Polytechnic; NorQuest College","funders":"","keywords":"Plan (archaeology); Academic integrity; Architectural engineering; Engineering; History; Computer science; Library science; Archaeology","score_opus":0.11095750658679937,"score_gpt":0.4195976745143669,"score_spread":0.30864016792756754,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410960503","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.046771,0.008914798,0.010567117,0.6760843,0.0045045293,0.0001815254,0.00010348788,0.00040442366,0.25246885],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2836893,0.0057672984,0.0331475,0.056999564,0.0012252785,0.00019961607,0.00018015967,0.00060752337,0.6181838],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9928179,0.0031578487,0.00015811183,0.00043763872,0.0019088322,0.0015197356],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9813679,0.0012332333,0.00041370175,0.000399024,0.002492402,0.014093708],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0076428214,0.00040096772,0.00042199888,0.00083483965,0.0360697,0.028031105,0.0021825691,0.006086899,0.019411014],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0076781223,0.0005001332,0.00035911746,0.0013669534,0.013084787,0.0136113195,0.015012329,0.02105718,0.006226628],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002823011,0.00042539148,0.002494004,0.00009796403,0.0000077237055,0.001052325,0.07322908,0.0003363611,0.00073735515,0.27972007,0.5181668,0.1237047],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000038507415,0.000047253874,0.0010079216,0.00013509525,0.0000024133042,0.00025417525,0.05564839,0.00017891021,0.00033811503,0.030219026,0.9121446,0.000020237723],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014226538,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.045361593,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9939131,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011760723,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.056374986,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08533043},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410960520","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-90091-4_11","title":"Strength of Character: Upholding Academic Integrity in Canadian Military Vocational Training","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Ethics and integrity in educational contexts","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Royal Military College of Canada; Université du Québec à Rimouski; Université du Québec en Outaouais","funders":"","keywords":"Vocational education; Character (mathematics); Training (meteorology); Academic integrity; Political science; Psychology; Management; Aeronautics; Engineering; Engineering ethics; Law; Geography; Economics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.09289666731672952,"score_gpt":0.3813171584650936,"score_spread":0.2884204911483641,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410960520","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06051363,0.006890591,0.001383463,0.060449686,0.00082743086,0.000038885264,0.00006285278,0.000037872756,0.8697956],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7875965,0.0025313927,0.00072887697,0.0039494904,0.000119103046,0.000024286794,0.000026432546,0.000052069798,0.2049718],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9930194,0.0015915226,0.00012823935,0.00039060338,0.0022626275,0.0026076424],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9934117,0.0020264483,0.00030479758,0.00022816271,0.0022756686,0.0017532564],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0043464433,0.0003975347,0.0004170507,0.002454264,0.04651713,0.016314473,0.0024467108,0.005156499,0.0069448147],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012777677,0.000374684,0.0003690851,0.0042621386,0.034854162,0.004193173,0.005725611,0.009346623,0.0006485747],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016041551,0.00001529143,0.0016806617,0.00004218228,0.0000035671817,0.00030147884,0.13816002,0.00020208891,0.00010567815,0.7777623,0.049160138,0.032550607],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009299794,0.00001807181,0.011736361,0.0005013109,0.00001616906,0.00035289288,0.1562416,0.00039334423,0.00034782692,0.074646525,0.7556583,0.00007829551],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9735337,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9910459,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9948435,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13564353,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.20058186,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9841673},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410960632","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-90091-4_2","title":"Successful Institutional Change: Lessons on Building a Culture of Academic Integrity","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Ethics and integrity in educational contexts","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Assiniboine Community College","funders":"","keywords":"Academic integrity; Research integrity; Institutional change; Culture change; Engineering ethics; Business; Political science; Sociology; Engineering; Public administration; Social science","score_opus":0.13295492284491156,"score_gpt":0.43378160418115547,"score_spread":0.3008266813362439,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410960632","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.027865123,0.0046470445,0.023415193,0.17908289,0.0013826187,0.00016252727,0.00002310107,0.00016745793,0.763254],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8993762,0.002737702,0.015285493,0.010858525,0.0004068707,0.0002597643,0.00003517234,0.00034186878,0.07069846],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9814237,0.013590618,0.00032771542,0.00072312885,0.0023028243,0.0016320084],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9786486,0.010912865,0.0009705544,0.0027277195,0.002882075,0.0038581525],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0208802,0.00054787734,0.00052236475,0.0011015156,0.01539416,0.0263231,0.0031504536,0.0056657963,0.006906212],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026165199,0.0004076786,0.0005188109,0.0015273971,0.07003039,0.02092089,0.012492463,0.011639042,0.0014922303],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000051693582,0.000055965862,0.00028221938,0.00003607378,0.000004758087,0.00008155023,0.03700503,0.0002061487,0.000052046064,0.9266084,0.019770106,0.015892535],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001663006,0.000024889698,0.00064049655,0.0003300733,0.0000056482427,0.0001032801,0.061094444,0.0004999196,0.00035925946,0.7067436,0.23015411,0.000027743965],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0075519034,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01480217,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9943342,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012199773,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.024967285,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.110426426},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410960664","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-90091-4_7","title":"Student Stress in Community Colleges: Creating Healthy, Ethical Spaces for Learning","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Ethics and integrity in educational contexts","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Bow Valley College","funders":"","keywords":"Stress (linguistics); Mathematics education; Pedagogy; Psychology; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.08442625696358214,"score_gpt":0.4388754640231844,"score_spread":0.35444920705960226,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410960664","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13662922,0.008340992,0.0060454938,0.24125983,0.004780555,0.00017385161,0.000028708795,0.00014612923,0.60259527],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8339012,0.002710613,0.0023934792,0.013817234,0.0009698704,0.00013385908,0.000020779067,0.00012391247,0.14592902],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9953434,0.0028718405,0.000057668156,0.00020054051,0.0008692014,0.00065725396],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9949157,0.001052033,0.0003718639,0.0001838522,0.0005857646,0.002890759],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038677058,0.00049756764,0.000353411,0.0005977896,0.016021343,0.017454084,0.0017830585,0.003887646,0.0062138084],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006172726,0.0002622736,0.00027532977,0.0007699365,0.024247525,0.007282273,0.011865263,0.010787793,0.0010070183],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033252443,0.00036833942,0.0033741968,0.00017593116,0.000011464764,0.00034124617,0.26680923,0.00022007561,0.00054996135,0.4842191,0.1478726,0.09602455],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013776263,0.000090737274,0.003323528,0.00050717586,0.000007372137,0.00023777441,0.36857882,0.0003079014,0.00040069196,0.23525974,0.39123145,0.000041088064],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005902837,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02458289,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99611235,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0057157627,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019856066,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.041470945},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410960917","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-90091-4_8","title":"Polytechnic Pinch Points for Academic Integrity: Reflections from Student Conduct Officers","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Ethics and integrity in educational contexts","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"SAIT Polytechnic; University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Academic integrity; Pinch; Political science; Mathematics education; Psychology; Social psychology; Engineering; Mechanical engineering","score_opus":0.18314566289400552,"score_gpt":0.47129924788415567,"score_spread":0.28815358499015015,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410960917","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.095653385,0.0055857953,0.0026986746,0.704894,0.0050959284,0.0001145208,0.00003704585,0.00014023542,0.1857804],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5319464,0.0049648667,0.0015340815,0.12335458,0.0016096764,0.00023134676,0.000027754528,0.00036787032,0.33596343],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.97589964,0.015313295,0.00045161878,0.0010026478,0.0034179855,0.003914784],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9672021,0.016108068,0.001765531,0.0010703511,0.0042930585,0.009560768],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013863734,0.0007367009,0.000780694,0.00094383414,0.07532261,0.029299244,0.0035075548,0.020701466,0.01211663],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04149215,0.0010896641,0.00066290685,0.0016165598,0.029620757,0.013686079,0.018441591,0.055175457,0.0040452196],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025989375,0.00026567042,0.0014831153,0.00009705228,0.000007725645,0.0012644589,0.5860563,0.00007818811,0.0002931002,0.056899052,0.32643324,0.02709611],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000066151774,0.00006285296,0.0011919403,0.00029665596,0.0000058551745,0.00033221135,0.6608177,0.00006053302,0.00029974108,0.00525463,0.33164492,0.000026366197],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019487593,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.067108825,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97929853,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011832769,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.027950304,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08585316},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410960952","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-90091-4_5","title":"Faculty Education on Academic Integrity: A Micro-Credential Approach","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Ethics and integrity in educational contexts","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Conestoga College","funders":"","keywords":"Credential; Academic integrity; Psychology; Medical education; Mathematics education; Computer science; Computer security; Medicine; Social psychology","score_opus":0.09570645267223427,"score_gpt":0.41100168513734486,"score_spread":0.3152952324651106,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410960952","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00573589,0.0015846031,0.024510706,0.02211196,0.00038167872,0.00005898839,0.000018700071,0.00005193935,0.94554555],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.56577545,0.0015886959,0.01284168,0.0037916698,0.0006118753,0.00017345893,0.000018339731,0.00007281137,0.415126],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974413,0.0012445746,0.00007142905,0.00018593221,0.0008220865,0.00023465263],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9926957,0.004591025,0.0002775568,0.00066007714,0.0009114261,0.0008643021],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004145903,0.00032842674,0.00030461853,0.0013032877,0.004381941,0.008119972,0.0014195497,0.0026049626,0.018249078],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00816966,0.00027663354,0.0002217669,0.0012219358,0.014400828,0.007297581,0.0052927267,0.005828425,0.0023114933],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001548654,0.000020637048,0.00007316824,0.000009617752,4.791439e-7,0.000015168324,0.00074517634,0.00014743744,0.000030645388,0.9834557,0.0053450456,0.010155403],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000030891642,0.000017691455,0.00027627125,0.00008096846,0.0000014897804,0.000055190314,0.0014408876,0.00075225154,0.0002677593,0.8959086,0.10118961,0.000006175946],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002231251,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006458201,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99739504,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0049753906,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008785388,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.061049223},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410961038","doi":"10.1111/jhn.70072","title":"Phony Data, Real Consequences: JHND Suggestions for Preventing and Managing Fraudulent Research Participation in Human Nutrition and Dietetics Research","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"editorial","venue":"Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Prince Edward Island","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Research data; Internet privacy; Data science; Data curation","score_opus":0.19376538582580569,"score_gpt":0.5197512023277314,"score_spread":0.3259858165019257,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410961038","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000051030343,0.0013099224,0.0003495377,0.16759628,0.82936996,0.000037481648,0.00006729598,0.00008558805,0.0011328154],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00082790834,0.0013272671,0.0006299461,0.068532914,0.9201506,0.00004936237,0.00003839,0.00006665652,0.008377011],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9760508,0.007071361,0.0043031606,0.0015914256,0.010109068,0.00087414176],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7688056,0.11533546,0.007425342,0.0063365023,0.0876953,0.014401755],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0434754,0.0029858723,0.0030875658,0.004749282,0.0050411075,0.012810964,0.005112395,0.024286987,0.014275464],"category_scores_gemma":[0.23248528,0.0014983267,0.0031922038,0.002527626,0.0041095275,0.0077246716,0.0026784292,0.037743088,0.008959205],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023979728,0.000009142009,0.00005925013,0.00008865079,0.000014663953,0.00009261489,0.00003698385,0.000018899538,0.00002406447,0.00034757244,0.99654156,0.0027425622],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000104251056,0.000025818123,0.00053639413,0.000664577,0.000096373995,0.0003524747,0.0002429895,0.00048497127,0.00015540444,0.0043904334,0.99289215,0.0000541097],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004576709,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01415,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.975713,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0060269255,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011220475,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22992265},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410961301","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-90091-4_14","title":"Automation, Creativity, and Ethics: Re-framing Academic Integrity in the Training of Music Technology Professionals","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Ethics and integrity in educational contexts","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Douglas College","funders":"","keywords":"Creativity; Framing (construction); Engineering ethics; Academic integrity; Psychology; Engineering; Social psychology","score_opus":0.14462590932993166,"score_gpt":0.4348293114840034,"score_spread":0.2902034021540717,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410961301","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.023639612,0.015396421,0.022539707,0.1287138,0.0018268033,0.000048803246,0.000015002417,0.0000956452,0.8077242],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8237494,0.0067808153,0.009236096,0.011218723,0.0013832519,0.000105826184,0.000020867723,0.000181133,0.1473238],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9876922,0.008951572,0.00020598051,0.00041029605,0.0021147996,0.00062524626],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98273104,0.013272024,0.00060844555,0.0008979358,0.0012188557,0.0012716869],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009881222,0.0003917005,0.00035540777,0.0013007722,0.0071691424,0.01661741,0.001336061,0.0042752847,0.003912738],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015627488,0.00022233471,0.00024410523,0.0011893758,0.053773507,0.010254607,0.008645743,0.010263796,0.0008800291],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005828087,0.00001558385,0.00020978795,0.000043122833,0.0000020090206,0.00004323929,0.047903083,0.00012877918,0.00006431432,0.91330504,0.012432358,0.025846858],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000054741404,0.000019520483,0.0007125993,0.0005447139,0.000004323877,0.00015503912,0.037123684,0.00044527714,0.00036424727,0.6924773,0.26812947,0.000018474539],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003439707,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007313924,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99572474,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005237736,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013154922,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.052257538},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410991644","doi":"10.55016/ojs/cpai.v8i2.80233","title":"Academic Integrity Policy and Support Provisions:","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Perspectives on Academic Integrity","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Ontario Tech University; St. Lawrence College","funders":"","keywords":"Academic integrity; Research integrity; Data integrity; Business; Political science; Process management; Computer security; Computer science; Engineering ethics; Public relations; Engineering","score_opus":0.02734309158742046,"score_gpt":0.3592140596643458,"score_spread":0.3318709680769253,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410991644","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4545249,0.0013326823,0.0070028966,0.11647002,0.0004813991,0.0015386902,0.0019608347,0.0005922575,0.41609624],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9540356,0.0005419508,0.0029777123,0.005562791,0.000106073145,0.00017650597,0.00050604186,0.000050347542,0.036042925],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.96747196,0.004103353,0.0021581284,0.001779357,0.017564153,0.0069230176],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.88883585,0.018408688,0.018712858,0.009888982,0.04155957,0.022593984],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019979222,0.0002226334,0.0003215199,0.0017566084,0.013696626,0.016626466,0.0032773677,0.0030912978,0.010973893],"category_scores_gemma":[0.087900445,0.00032545012,0.00028520072,0.00431377,0.007926178,0.005050087,0.006078804,0.0037467342,0.0020895258],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002272898,0.00062268233,0.19662207,0.0013673742,0.00007319083,0.0019187027,0.17987153,0.0013597539,0.0068347696,0.16808306,0.13432644,0.30869305],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000038069924,0.0001916745,0.16589957,0.00076365867,0.000052805277,0.00050489465,0.10797864,0.00056733214,0.003154853,0.005323639,0.71539164,0.0001332583],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.69514006,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7312115,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9969087,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.045116093,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2572043,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6133106},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411089294","doi":"10.55016/ojs/cpai.v8i3.79408","title":"Toward a Nuanced Understanding: Faculty Barriers to Navigating Academic Integrity Violations","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Perspectives on Academic Integrity","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Conestoga College","funders":"","keywords":"Academic integrity; Psychology; Research integrity; Engineering ethics; Medical education; Pedagogy; Social psychology; Medicine; Engineering","score_opus":0.09262262916595014,"score_gpt":0.3911793700104201,"score_spread":0.2985567408444699,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411089294","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93403244,0.00076186395,0.0042212866,0.028197266,0.00009088297,0.00009786399,0.00010490236,0.00006552863,0.032428045],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99580115,0.00040853152,0.00078460085,0.0009227826,0.000012143539,0.000016016804,0.00002161686,0.000013997362,0.0020190775],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98319304,0.0070558502,0.0007953103,0.00074177684,0.004819481,0.0033944247],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95757926,0.017974807,0.008268376,0.0018336314,0.008013312,0.006330612],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01609609,0.00035676328,0.0005276941,0.0036701492,0.02047018,0.010951026,0.0022371323,0.0021579403,0.0040164725],"category_scores_gemma":[0.058259264,0.00046919874,0.0004137251,0.002821385,0.01374172,0.00987068,0.010346627,0.005499376,0.0003168218],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017018589,0.00003245551,0.02753935,0.00007284184,0.000008146365,0.00025936012,0.9527924,0.00009821674,0.00084104267,0.0066322205,0.0012369899,0.010470006],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000021701019,0.000026401776,0.020140676,0.00012106425,0.0000062076556,0.00010968267,0.9639888,0.00014837319,0.0003342299,0.0020049226,0.01308432,0.000033263725],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.48619148,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.58101606,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9978421,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.026260331,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.065003045,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9667231},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411131767","doi":"10.1007/s10805-025-09649-5","title":"Academic and Research Integrity in Nepali Universities: A Comprehensive Policy Analysis","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Academic Ethics","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Nepali; Academic integrity; Research integrity; Political science; Sociology; Engineering ethics; Public relations; Philosophy; Engineering; Linguistics","score_opus":0.16370928838472076,"score_gpt":0.5127499276515928,"score_spread":0.349040639266872,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411131767","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5142654,0.017815022,0.0023864887,0.29103374,0.00019627577,0.0005033794,0.00045283022,0.000024301673,0.17332253],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9820602,0.0043303603,0.0006163914,0.0091186315,0.00011937424,0.00024595688,0.000044712433,0.0000073177694,0.0034570063],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.92885333,0.04394843,0.0026391824,0.0015491742,0.009637843,0.013372049],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6080663,0.33479634,0.024236739,0.005012154,0.0153783215,0.0125101805],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05646663,0.0003711766,0.0010574154,0.0062230793,0.017310288,0.023763988,0.002395976,0.01303071,0.007555185],"category_scores_gemma":[0.12907803,0.0009497178,0.00071330677,0.00916123,0.017028045,0.013439643,0.012081044,0.0103226025,0.0003819007],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00030212733,0.000462749,0.052907202,0.0015880822,0.000214784,0.0011850786,0.039253455,0.0018159329,0.0003698253,0.84639627,0.009327572,0.046177004],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022309089,0.0007430518,0.16707778,0.008624988,0.00061738986,0.0015127871,0.22227049,0.0070107677,0.0021544143,0.3930439,0.19632328,0.0003980801],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03203877,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.057511356,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9869693,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.041104525,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0961866,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29862761},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411172146","doi":"10.5406/23256672.101.4.09","title":"Blending Human and Artificial Minds: Reflections on Marcel Danesi's <i>AI in Foreign Language Learning and Teaching: Theory and Practice</i>","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Italica","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Cognitive science; Psychology; Foreign language teaching; Linguistics; Epistemology; Mathematics education; Foreign language","score_opus":0.03510197298193037,"score_gpt":0.4161082254524205,"score_spread":0.38100625247049014,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411172146","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.048243538,0.04961022,0.00895756,0.74801093,0.00415409,0.00008875633,0.000022529657,0.00005308796,0.14085932],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.82358456,0.023840304,0.007438582,0.07050857,0.0021135004,0.00017008475,0.000008774325,0.0001438882,0.07219172],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99261594,0.0053670593,0.000142442,0.00041059544,0.000933694,0.0005302191],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98889434,0.00894521,0.00046284733,0.00028007218,0.00062825484,0.00078934734],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011451214,0.0005082301,0.0005317843,0.0012201663,0.009001681,0.009251106,0.0016157681,0.0050070477,0.0016443173],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014750233,0.00038746468,0.0003297268,0.0006800266,0.035186343,0.011025778,0.007715149,0.013568894,0.00049012405],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023140989,0.00004902518,0.0003829424,0.00014430686,0.000006778866,0.0013239079,0.4549339,0.00019196578,0.000401733,0.46703225,0.050520208,0.02498987],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009116057,0.000044683726,0.00037262889,0.00050541415,0.0000044859876,0.0012419559,0.11001362,0.0003050121,0.0006080798,0.061510615,0.8253534,0.000030904383],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009982703,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012959214,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011451214,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008251922,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0041091214,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.060560524},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411237045","doi":"10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.15160","title":"Citation Contamination by Paper Mill Articles in Systematic Reviews of the Life Sciences","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"JAMA Network Open","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Mill; Contamination; Environmental science; History; Library science; Biology; Computer science; Archaeology; Ecology","score_opus":0.04692872264228141,"score_gpt":0.34333756742881316,"score_spread":0.29640884478653173,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411237045","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19140887,0.6100659,0.0687465,0.06911588,0.013025862,0.0108942315,0.016782666,0.00075006066,0.019209996],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7589965,0.121811524,0.07245627,0.016566278,0.006751291,0.01327683,0.0060256035,0.0005106667,0.0036050964],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.33636907,0.3432018,0.22069678,0.021961799,0.07538576,0.0023848393],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.09548005,0.61200225,0.2275671,0.031201381,0.031993393,0.0017559248],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.2581261,0.0013303478,0.003540765,0.029849097,0.0031142845,0.00830628,0.0033326088,0.0036954135,0.0073651182],"category_scores_gemma":[0.74717945,0.0016591547,0.003989854,0.046021298,0.0051190522,0.008129368,0.006925885,0.0025212273,0.0019844377],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001562125,0.00018236834,0.5468762,0.12415422,0.016683433,0.0010844026,0.01197143,0.001429464,0.001421108,0.0092060575,0.028561065,0.25686812],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00093572866,0.0010886972,0.45475292,0.31925604,0.021898717,0.0063496665,0.009889449,0.007307376,0.0057717417,0.047083408,0.12491799,0.0007482453],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003410592,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0060108188,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9963046,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004964308,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012297623,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9148626},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity","bibliometrics"],"domain":"methods","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","research_integrity"],"domain":"methods","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W4411440405","doi":"10.5430/ijhe.v14n3p33","title":"Evaluating the Psychometric Properties of a Questionnaire on Reasons Influencing Student to Plagiarize and Comparing the Perception of Teachers and Students","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Higher Education","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec en Outaouais","funders":"","keywords":"Perception; Psychology; Incentive; Exploratory factor analysis; Social psychology; Medical education; Applied psychology; Psychometrics; Medicine; Developmental psychology","score_opus":0.059073079801332716,"score_gpt":0.4554786365400095,"score_spread":0.3964055567386768,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411440405","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99224055,0.00005202943,0.0031351903,0.00024197283,0.000034031,0.0012189288,0.00033458203,0.000050476818,0.0026922598],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98917353,0.00010711948,0.0062873526,0.00014604416,0.000029404615,0.0026724138,0.0005556989,0.000022661141,0.0010058621],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9879865,0.006243896,0.002027962,0.00061692635,0.0025051315,0.0006195193],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8981925,0.06693036,0.012440375,0.004860296,0.014466488,0.0031099396],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.025097242,0.0005043179,0.0006474531,0.0025083777,0.00086965994,0.0012769976,0.00072781276,0.00092236954,0.00403947],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06709505,0.00040185204,0.00121407,0.0019013373,0.0013100017,0.0014227194,0.0013925597,0.001136484,0.0010502978],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000581666,0.0020581633,0.889922,0.0004505251,0.00017231936,0.00019058814,0.022661615,0.0009981595,0.0035798743,0.00090424006,0.0019190348,0.076561734],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013112403,0.0019221845,0.9748078,0.00012944534,0.000052872958,0.00013545512,0.01374823,0.002906685,0.0017421499,0.00063215895,0.0037350256,0.000056967598],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009469899,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00094214955,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9990776,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008367479,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016520299,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13272846},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411532530","doi":"10.1007/s10805-025-09657-5","title":"Correction: Academic and Research Integrity in Nepali Universities: A Comprehensive Policy Analysis","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Academic Ethics","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Nepali; Academic integrity; Research integrity; Political science; Engineering ethics; Computer science; Library science; Public relations; Philosophy; Engineering; Linguistics","score_opus":0.14284122946967148,"score_gpt":0.5002791847549476,"score_spread":0.3574379552852761,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411532530","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0011652583,0.001292814,0.00095633307,0.5648278,0.41985065,0.00008637846,0.0014674251,0.00024870533,0.010104681],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0874468,0.0071497466,0.0063712327,0.49600434,0.15026595,0.00079581985,0.0011948961,0.00093054166,0.24984065],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9750494,0.005363858,0.004393148,0.002077712,0.009838248,0.003277682],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.75292504,0.09820922,0.012911485,0.014872111,0.11182283,0.009259377],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017554672,0.001282237,0.0024528764,0.00435062,0.008736311,0.012259548,0.005068893,0.030542985,0.029596291],"category_scores_gemma":[0.26735353,0.0014786109,0.0012707398,0.0060617956,0.0074891816,0.005299388,0.0040786145,0.032296594,0.011992206],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024741716,0.0000065505205,0.00023670946,0.00020808254,0.000024391,0.00028590404,0.0004104831,0.00004626842,0.000022942677,0.004937475,0.99005777,0.003738609],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007084722,0.000022076823,0.002300618,0.0020351005,0.00013528673,0.0006623666,0.0020634164,0.00051954907,0.00038946213,0.0069382205,0.98475975,0.000103236656],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.042419974,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.059246916,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9824453,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014649414,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04419281,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10628945},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"},{"model":"gpt","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"editorial","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W4411850524","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-92534-4_3","title":"The Future of Text-Matching Software: From Detecting Artificial Intelligence to Preventing Plagiarism","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec en Outaouais","funders":"","keywords":"Matching (statistics); Plagiarism detection; Computer science; Software; Artificial intelligence; Natural language processing; Software engineering; Programming language; Medicine","score_opus":0.021832077655200052,"score_gpt":0.291037073097101,"score_spread":0.2692049954419009,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411850524","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021857077,0.15641257,0.38278627,0.057726324,0.004143993,0.00019973436,0.000877354,0.009457936,0.36653876],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.24722148,0.078537226,0.36857286,0.007834869,0.004855761,0.00024147666,0.0013792617,0.0027934061,0.2885637],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99729675,0.00077515206,0.00015393665,0.0003062173,0.001364124,0.00010381345],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98217094,0.0135554755,0.0006571185,0.0016591038,0.0016652083,0.00029225077],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003846984,0.00054984883,0.0006377803,0.003723914,0.00087222835,0.0062771197,0.0023298797,0.002617991,0.013801594],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01895986,0.00038541784,0.00046370373,0.0041779545,0.0045904135,0.014100019,0.0015236564,0.0024469947,0.005416309],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004874317,0.000063583386,0.0006759389,0.0005214357,0.000022317123,0.000056969213,0.000589457,0.0012096476,0.0016850982,0.19791777,0.060731515,0.73647755],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027292057,0.000069952395,0.00116797,0.0006009764,0.000036275913,0.00056206057,0.0004947546,0.020782514,0.0051997798,0.60997754,0.36103222,0.000048647504],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001832553,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014734168,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.997382,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014868892,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002122545,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04617095},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411859224","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-92534-4_7","title":"Surveillance and Guidance: An Academic Integrity Crossway for Humans Using Generative AI","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec en Outaouais; Université du Québec à Chicoutimi","funders":"","keywords":"Generative grammar; Academic integrity; Computer science; Psychology; Artificial intelligence; Library science","score_opus":0.07766863392453498,"score_gpt":0.3937340639873904,"score_spread":0.3160654300628554,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411859224","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007677213,0.0020240943,0.44718012,0.020953627,0.0005808193,0.00008301897,0.00014341161,0.0034665724,0.51789105],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4519478,0.0025369432,0.3136191,0.004406245,0.00054021314,0.0001914766,0.0005007665,0.0025218045,0.22373563],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99726176,0.0014121857,0.00007800344,0.00024139154,0.000853062,0.00015355065],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9930448,0.004110985,0.0002121813,0.0017142154,0.00060452695,0.00031330326],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035096235,0.0004779354,0.00031798592,0.001629869,0.0026473626,0.009943251,0.0019412532,0.0027608345,0.013838313],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011460776,0.00043250283,0.0005906071,0.0011930475,0.010840408,0.010424401,0.004783231,0.0034634564,0.0034797036],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014047869,0.000023253135,0.00040838594,0.00006796414,0.000009036469,0.000092451846,0.007361193,0.0014460634,0.00080461527,0.8646051,0.031507302,0.09366058],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000069833845,0.000015446709,0.00019368557,0.00013784227,0.000010045166,0.00026545883,0.0023945412,0.010745912,0.001694339,0.6638922,0.3206164,0.000027188504],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0051840637,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006458831,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9972392,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021025974,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025679949,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.046293795},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412442268","doi":"10.7202/1118737ar","title":"Academic Integrity in Selected Western Canadian Colleges and Polytechnics: A Policy Analysis","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Educational Administration and Policy","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba; University of Calgary; Assiniboine Community College; Red River College","funders":"","keywords":"Higher education; Political science; Sociology; Pedagogy; Mathematics education; Psychology; Economic growth; Economics","score_opus":0.018565432381618698,"score_gpt":0.36354056053327005,"score_spread":0.3449751281516514,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412442268","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.88975513,0.007569866,0.001298952,0.032240745,0.00014698792,0.0013295198,0.005020087,0.000096684365,0.06254187],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9743224,0.00527647,0.002821133,0.005258516,0.000058933314,0.0005663104,0.0015653513,0.000042368563,0.010088616],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9724373,0.0038371333,0.001225017,0.0018154709,0.010422371,0.0102627585],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.91065276,0.020841626,0.010387639,0.0022537566,0.033783533,0.022080742],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018144885,0.0004944147,0.00086271093,0.011681818,0.033738684,0.012362573,0.0046251826,0.002701559,0.004605627],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04628112,0.00080285326,0.00055495335,0.030890003,0.0074885646,0.0024953291,0.004771403,0.0027980756,0.00038652171],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00040110893,0.000485981,0.5362402,0.003229699,0.00019960898,0.0026485717,0.14108843,0.0020378504,0.0015971971,0.10902001,0.054777257,0.1482742],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000056933917,0.00013348916,0.5733326,0.0016820552,0.00011738288,0.00037065262,0.27564266,0.0015625757,0.00082576537,0.0030586743,0.14297351,0.00024364691],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99654216,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99783736,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9972984,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.38033253,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.5485955,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7187264},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412520984","doi":"10.1016/j.cjca.2025.07.018","title":"Peer Review, Profit, and Publish: Addressing Inequities in Academic Publishing","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"Canadian Journal of Cardiology","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba; St. Boniface Hospital","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Publication; Publishing; Peer review; Library science; Advertising; Law","score_opus":0.08922424626198287,"score_gpt":0.3409952157240992,"score_spread":0.2517709694621163,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412520984","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0011288052,0.0005863871,0.00005266197,0.99166447,0.0022012074,0.0000052617265,0.0000054229563,0.0000073205406,0.0043483707],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.06120883,0.0017263645,0.0004567603,0.8838569,0.04112673,0.000040136376,0.00001317133,0.000050485854,0.011520664],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9782985,0.0053325375,0.002017597,0.0013235246,0.008667293,0.0043606744],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8072788,0.095880754,0.012287861,0.0047032093,0.026546543,0.053302735],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019375753,0.00034718987,0.0010575762,0.0019918925,0.020797702,0.014751501,0.0033159163,0.070696436,0.010528853],"category_scores_gemma":[0.14101441,0.0006172686,0.00077679055,0.0022118157,0.017894125,0.009246357,0.0049298895,0.04274737,0.0023581581],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007361956,0.00011741004,0.006187635,0.00011955915,0.000036528498,0.0034656713,0.0029209661,0.000083243795,0.00018538056,0.03207427,0.92366326,0.031072553],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018738845,0.00013475424,0.013232556,0.0010132886,0.000087503475,0.0058115763,0.015243417,0.0009945465,0.00047200648,0.09614875,0.86644536,0.00022884505],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.072003685,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.17257516,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98062426,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01914042,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05064462,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14316916},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412759825","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-95686-7_9","title":"Faculty Perspectives on Academic Dishonesty: Evolving Beliefs and Opportunities for Learning at Two Canadian Research Universities","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Ethics and integrity in educational contexts","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Academic dishonesty; Dishonesty; Psychology; Medical education; Engineering ethics; Mathematics education; Pedagogy; Political science; Cheating; Medicine; Engineering; Social psychology","score_opus":0.23914130003827017,"score_gpt":0.4551001724116717,"score_spread":0.21595887237340156,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412759825","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.69626796,0.0024860715,0.00087313517,0.100765824,0.00049270643,0.00009969278,0.00012056996,0.00006554869,0.1988285],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94844586,0.0008548385,0.000310908,0.004440507,0.00004696051,0.000027329304,0.000029964289,0.00004421168,0.045799427],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9796576,0.0068330546,0.00033692928,0.0007436543,0.005254103,0.0071746823],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94136703,0.020423848,0.0033033018,0.000759194,0.010287875,0.023858787],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015957056,0.00035317353,0.0005178874,0.0033832206,0.06822024,0.022694282,0.0039414586,0.005443345,0.007266323],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030342624,0.000549326,0.00042013323,0.0065014353,0.034518734,0.00679551,0.011216439,0.010462277,0.00049990707],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004149325,0.000052453834,0.006510124,0.00004223294,0.0000041266435,0.00045324044,0.9295197,0.00007637973,0.0004687919,0.03619674,0.014292174,0.012342551],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004612559,0.000017014267,0.008839138,0.000113211594,0.0000046065766,0.00006593581,0.93091774,0.00006682511,0.00021621746,0.002658549,0.05705741,0.000038756672],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9069727,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9737534,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99455667,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.16559574,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.24165536,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96779066},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412761482","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-7234434/v1","title":"Discursive legitimation strategies of academic misconduct consulting agencies in Mainland China","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Research Square","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimation; Misconduct; Mainland China; China; Political science; Business; Public relations; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.10724949593878222,"score_gpt":0.46443218173644163,"score_spread":0.35718268579765944,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412761482","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98613954,0.0002159078,0.00021188894,0.0011513084,0.000006167969,0.00003125633,0.000077778124,0.000015681457,0.012150456],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974874,0.000041319214,0.00006815344,0.00004618912,0.000004422194,0.0000087243625,0.000027689737,0.0000025219908,0.00231356],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957268,0.00097649044,0.0003007508,0.0004716321,0.0012577906,0.001266562],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97364795,0.010534884,0.005604802,0.0011367024,0.005893354,0.0031823686],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003674837,0.0001693959,0.00043156816,0.005451226,0.005624595,0.00520331,0.0012390706,0.0013862804,0.006350134],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015625171,0.00020973546,0.00021038961,0.0057778494,0.0026155591,0.0020540133,0.0026494446,0.0009250305,0.00058688736],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00034924815,0.00028002204,0.7518096,0.00021353141,0.00007780542,0.002217028,0.0967657,0.0015209485,0.0017386235,0.046138287,0.008985127,0.08990408],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000079429796,0.000153251,0.8398345,0.0001505748,0.00012344446,0.0003864041,0.109125234,0.012044428,0.0014004543,0.011211763,0.025406593,0.00008394003],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09359619,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12201998,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9986137,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0088259755,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013788762,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18610281},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413041880","doi":"10.1080/08989621.2025.2542197","title":"AI disclosure, moral shame, and the punishment of honesty","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Accountability in Research","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Artificial Intelligence in Medicine (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Honesty; Shame; Transparency (behavior); Psychology; Punishment (psychology); Constructive; Perspective (graphical); Narrative; Social psychology; Process (computing); Law; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.10953065969817855,"score_gpt":0.4822537312601409,"score_spread":0.3727230715619624,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413041880","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"reproducibility","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"reproducibility","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4066893,0.02389607,0.07145685,0.31393284,0.0035757811,0.00023838572,0.00014168583,0.0002626861,0.17980643],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98721594,0.0018074911,0.0034941542,0.005017991,0.00049434276,0.00006700456,0.000012948107,0.00002562894,0.0018644119],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.80215997,0.16150035,0.007924731,0.0028991913,0.02323639,0.0022793459],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.48994294,0.35593477,0.10772008,0.022126524,0.019200863,0.00507483],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.07604525,0.00041301834,0.0005484189,0.0014071849,0.006361382,0.009190467,0.0014017446,0.004106798,0.0024465641],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2906599,0.0003910668,0.0005689413,0.0014310176,0.029259011,0.008695694,0.007612585,0.0073512876,0.00049917045],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00041581594,0.0001788172,0.026243404,0.0023635325,0.00023386312,0.001710405,0.3856269,0.00079276616,0.00251291,0.46629333,0.01469744,0.09893073],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014847166,0.00042188523,0.02399872,0.006595614,0.0002581226,0.0062610246,0.12817764,0.0037052417,0.0064731776,0.63791996,0.18566547,0.00037466822],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00074908586,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008216133,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9958932,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0046019363,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008230367,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40217054},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"domain":"methods","study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"domain":"methods","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W4413270134","doi":"10.1016/j.ajpe.2025.101484","title":"Incorporation of Responsible Conduct of Research Education in Brazilian Graduate Pharmacy Programs: A Qualitative Assessment","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"National Cancer Institute; Fundação Oswaldo Cruz; European Commission; University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center","keywords":"Pharmacy; Medical education; Qualitative research; Graduate education; Graduate students; Psychology; Engineering ethics; Medicine; Sociology; Engineering; Family medicine; Social science","score_opus":0.26196384976753073,"score_gpt":0.6396625568327032,"score_spread":0.3776987070651725,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413270134","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"incentives","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"incentives","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9900607,0.00042304883,0.0024919321,0.002201656,0.000031024694,0.0006468306,0.00012839121,0.000017648938,0.003998662],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9946313,0.00065359235,0.0027403636,0.00044856276,0.000011422303,0.0007113238,0.00006365068,0.000008538723,0.0007312516],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9805761,0.012884395,0.00092103536,0.0009590323,0.002953551,0.0017058828],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94660753,0.034478407,0.006720846,0.0014609107,0.0062127407,0.0045195185],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.043621235,0.00028311816,0.00056178414,0.0028118107,0.0034579046,0.0025850527,0.0012937044,0.0010102739,0.0013852095],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06286059,0.00048847625,0.0005272648,0.0018825774,0.005218811,0.0021812548,0.004688794,0.0014722148,0.00013521152],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007851892,0.00035541237,0.070200786,0.0012147577,0.000021354983,0.00043530547,0.8723132,0.00010501983,0.0023439934,0.002958625,0.0011087625,0.04886423],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020151712,0.00035546013,0.08530944,0.0014640654,0.000030044206,0.00045556753,0.8912578,0.00046884597,0.0011355983,0.0009684891,0.01848027,0.00005417807],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0061862436,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011004879,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9989897,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007462769,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017666778,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23069388},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413509826","doi":"10.64628/aam.wwdgwwp3r","title":"Artificial intelligence is getting better at writing, and universities should worry about plagiarism","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary; Brock University","funders":"","keywords":"Worry; Psychology; Mathematics education; Engineering ethics; Engineering","score_opus":0.047542021484674235,"score_gpt":0.31749016239881805,"score_spread":0.2699481409141438,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413509826","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01260504,0.009097974,0.0029912367,0.88760656,0.006859293,0.000032286276,0.00021331024,0.00060409546,0.07999032],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5011054,0.015579657,0.013835996,0.3231686,0.024447838,0.00012484891,0.0011019278,0.0013130882,0.119322576],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.92110306,0.028363392,0.007262285,0.004046228,0.034583014,0.0046419664],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.54993,0.13671006,0.066299774,0.05211574,0.13971236,0.055232123],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03836047,0.00064719655,0.00148311,0.0060820924,0.016086549,0.032440744,0.0024895095,0.011069462,0.027032645],"category_scores_gemma":[0.28659055,0.0004913332,0.0009708081,0.009585859,0.020303793,0.026733715,0.007199883,0.019987065,0.016018448],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00044611623,0.00045865556,0.02761199,0.001260665,0.00018910135,0.0004098193,0.02228427,0.0005718644,0.0019716101,0.112751156,0.56455004,0.26749477],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000073027084,0.00026141756,0.021303874,0.0011726375,0.00009371607,0.00095749606,0.020734288,0.0006140751,0.0021631455,0.1980089,0.754364,0.000253371],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005914909,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0057035433,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9889305,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007344401,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016972218,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20287192},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["research_integrity"],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"commentary","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["research_integrity"],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"commentary","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W4413859228","doi":"10.5539/hes.v15n3p426","title":"Reviewer Acknowledgements for Higher Education Studies, Vol. 15, No. 3","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Higher Education Studies","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Higher education; Mathematics education; Psychology; Pedagogy; Medical education; Political science; Medicine","score_opus":0.08215458718126277,"score_gpt":0.4425717552931697,"score_spread":0.36041716811190694,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413859228","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00022773784,0.0057273055,0.0024754766,0.13722704,0.8419788,0.0010121117,0.00060396106,0.00072676636,0.010020814],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.013620947,0.017322773,0.0101186,0.15005256,0.6308584,0.0056314105,0.0024696945,0.003437016,0.16648853],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.92050517,0.020164235,0.014129628,0.0050501577,0.037656486,0.0024943594],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.2649219,0.042231493,0.020680659,0.015068473,0.6395951,0.017502338],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.062333796,0.0028345035,0.0037347316,0.011353078,0.0060726097,0.015671525,0.0049141464,0.00769359,0.10479265],"category_scores_gemma":[0.4439901,0.001134705,0.003034785,0.007191871,0.0029123346,0.008275882,0.005033259,0.008851496,0.066477425],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001698761,0.000004955907,0.00012087269,0.00033122895,0.000008830952,0.000038232734,0.00011768518,0.000008129652,0.000035465273,0.00045210912,0.98715836,0.011707191],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023700923,0.000017829962,0.00041075493,0.0013648698,0.000022874809,0.00023867558,0.0004215748,0.00008052432,0.00007774754,0.0009847059,0.99632484,0.000031988846],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017776806,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028737467,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10479265,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0067621856,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018278288,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35056633},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414183857","doi":"10.1007/s10639-025-13718-y","title":"Taking notes with artificial intelligence (AI)-based technology and academic integrity: perspectives from online learners","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Education and Information Technologies","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Athabasca University","funders":"","keywords":"Accountability; Educational technology; Usability; Copying; Critical thinking; Blended learning; Qualitative research; Higher education; Cognitive reframing","score_opus":0.029353544537528913,"score_gpt":0.3512165937698792,"score_spread":0.32186304923235026,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414183857","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.86965716,0.0024537384,0.0022472083,0.04452376,0.00045168935,0.000075417585,0.00004857202,0.000036438138,0.08050602],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98160285,0.0012702512,0.00043105174,0.0031830675,0.00019346375,0.000021820268,0.000015048168,0.000026683374,0.013255827],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9853898,0.009165145,0.0005273196,0.0006209194,0.0026198574,0.0016769149],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9343049,0.040506396,0.007865864,0.0018511218,0.0052935476,0.010178146],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012564244,0.00048249427,0.0005692279,0.001936833,0.017413162,0.02114658,0.0020174964,0.0054308055,0.0057556117],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04883425,0.00034316388,0.0004375698,0.0020744572,0.019104896,0.014267059,0.0117146745,0.010525609,0.000917352],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020216963,0.00017321114,0.009856699,0.000059440918,0.000008155073,0.00092054845,0.96973175,0.000032279364,0.0003170776,0.009135938,0.0020694088,0.007675343],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000044527096,0.00005116089,0.0021607887,0.000089001216,0.0000066221974,0.00060584,0.9712559,0.000052195126,0.00027577826,0.0023677726,0.023114718,0.000015703205],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0054993345,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0064612175,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9945692,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002973053,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006166925,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06644684},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414277806","doi":"10.1177/00332941251379435","title":"A Pre-Registered Examination of the Relationship Between Personality, Stress, and Academic Cheating in the Age of Online Learning","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Psychological Reports","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Cheating; Academic integrity; Academic dishonesty; Narcissism; Psychological intervention; Big Five personality traits; Personality; Checklist","score_opus":0.15618638708719196,"score_gpt":0.4377183676017605,"score_spread":0.28153198051456857,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414277806","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9982493,0.00006106843,0.000049643597,0.00008951849,0.00000848748,0.000036111116,0.00028977118,0.0000025818267,0.0012135663],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99838173,0.00008744555,0.00012732744,0.00004506698,0.000009847752,0.00003150641,0.00031589795,0.0000013724892,0.0009997473],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99941957,0.000077218385,0.000040460065,0.000054862878,0.00016743415,0.00024045601],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9948126,0.00067192374,0.0013652314,0.0002339269,0.0011104536,0.00180585],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014724686,0.0002140622,0.00024445716,0.0008811052,0.0011748956,0.0008260541,0.0003641319,0.00037567472,0.002650129],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004233348,0.00017054316,0.0005819671,0.0011070152,0.00042182053,0.00043664788,0.0007963254,0.0010267397,0.00031860103],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023930214,0.00008983819,0.9960955,0.00000922987,0.000011014361,0.00003352187,0.00052743335,0.0000120333825,0.00016500718,0.0000214183,0.0001163501,0.002894747],"study_design_scores_gemma":[2.8779755e-7,0.000043517473,0.99944896,0.00000289025,0.0000015764766,0.000007777299,0.0003633505,0.00001489226,0.000016355169,0.0000032335663,0.000095997326,0.0000010247367],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12880148,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.35603526,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9996243,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017145445,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003033275,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25610352},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415099214","doi":"10.1111/1748-8583.70019","title":"The Case for Expanding the Domain of Registered Reports: Confronting Academic Dishonesty and Declining Confidence in Science","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Human Resource Management Journal","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Guard (computer science); Scholarship; Scope (computer science); Public domain; Construct (python library); Publication; Dishonesty; Human resource management; Quality (philosophy)","score_opus":0.04566082018049587,"score_gpt":0.38643600943931994,"score_spread":0.34077518925882405,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415099214","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"reproducibility","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":"reproducibility","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0077440017,0.0041701123,0.006160852,0.9516651,0.013928639,0.00003843772,0.000024549496,0.00024780424,0.016020494],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4227922,0.013867204,0.031343732,0.4262225,0.07543356,0.0003565281,0.000147674,0.001504661,0.028331889],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.80888796,0.11447638,0.01718544,0.006669186,0.04707805,0.0057030213],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.20402457,0.56223077,0.04940516,0.06242721,0.100917354,0.020994898],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.21305808,0.0003880966,0.0011861575,0.0039395606,0.012712194,0.048207607,0.00649674,0.022361832,0.0059026354],"category_scores_gemma":[0.5104555,0.00093166076,0.0013885768,0.0038212622,0.03461444,0.0436656,0.01414533,0.03377343,0.002885357],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011335867,0.00013358699,0.0038856124,0.0006819426,0.000036527475,0.0012691453,0.047577634,0.00028055147,0.00081074337,0.3946729,0.43019375,0.120344184],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000054640335,0.00012157765,0.0021349676,0.0021491847,0.000045844892,0.0013301411,0.02573506,0.00080780796,0.0012949295,0.11830246,0.84783405,0.00018941407],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002323313,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031359207,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9776382,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0066779302,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.022042666,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9704395},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415116317","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-98157-9_4","title":"From Healthcare to Higher Ed: A Five-Level Framework for Fostering Academic Integrity","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Ethics and integrity in educational contexts","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Misconduct; Academic integrity; Higher education; Health care; Best practice; Cheating; Scientific misconduct","score_opus":0.2022590668297688,"score_gpt":0.45204411315747806,"score_spread":0.24978504632770926,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415116317","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014677703,0.0027729385,0.14658105,0.115552135,0.0010375889,0.00046260643,0.000099362274,0.00037473586,0.71844184],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6989006,0.0025816765,0.18053548,0.014841679,0.00041092644,0.0006554898,0.0001730635,0.0001677629,0.10173338],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99006253,0.005392962,0.00048886973,0.00056970323,0.0018369395,0.001648976],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.992446,0.0021796466,0.00064720714,0.00057532097,0.0017058062,0.0024461418],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010703615,0.0006723333,0.00038329253,0.002640927,0.008967917,0.021081436,0.0029126492,0.00725562,0.008099731],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009375875,0.00058220566,0.0009428777,0.0020222631,0.027112372,0.013207588,0.013822183,0.011802204,0.0018198825],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004311912,0.000042759646,0.0005848881,0.000055930155,0.000005877386,0.00008761284,0.0063778497,0.00048307274,0.000087235494,0.9697259,0.008752307,0.013792162],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013703386,0.000059901726,0.0013157472,0.0006857299,0.000018550974,0.00031270532,0.015464713,0.0022443128,0.0005886855,0.8038927,0.17535606,0.00004722299],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013421094,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.025762137,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9927444,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011596897,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.037589207,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08414179},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415122066","doi":"10.1007/s40979-025-00202-w","title":"Reducing undergraduate students’ trust of commercial contract cheating websites with an academic support literacy intervention","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal for Educational Integrity","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Cheating; Academic integrity; Reputation; Psychological intervention; Certification; Intervention (counseling); Literacy","score_opus":0.03674219879460586,"score_gpt":0.4593670395512566,"score_spread":0.42262484075665074,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415122066","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9989008,0.000027292488,0.00013720064,0.00017277307,0.000011567138,0.00016955254,0.000011215779,0.000023427825,0.000546238],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970227,0.00009390595,0.0016472961,0.00013294931,0.00001785566,0.0004468622,0.000040621682,0.0000029890725,0.00059476343],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988869,0.00044077696,0.0001009957,0.00007500911,0.00021744594,0.00027892267],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9942298,0.0010481102,0.0011236938,0.000299139,0.00055037293,0.0027488589],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018390022,0.00048361756,0.0005291248,0.0005686775,0.0008607797,0.0010111511,0.0006804263,0.0008360246,0.004052507],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009198856,0.00027782322,0.0004817606,0.0003443819,0.00041222517,0.0005004055,0.0012491494,0.0016766184,0.00044568317],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0068023354,0.32694155,0.15160128,0.0008535096,0.00022481545,0.0005353769,0.010583396,0.0008751284,0.0121068675,0.0005203258,0.0085888775,0.48036647],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0055469275,0.11518631,0.8314571,0.00043174165,0.0005586678,0.00040010424,0.009095108,0.007885865,0.017718371,0.00091504544,0.010665723,0.0001390719],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011720619,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023633128,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.999164,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009560816,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00205553,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.013557017},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415696757","doi":"10.3102/0013189x251385537","title":"The AI <sup>3</sup> Model: Future Directions for Artificial Intelligence, Assessment Innovation, and Academic Integrity","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Educational Researcher","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Winnipeg; Brock University; Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Generative grammar; Academic integrity; Educational assessment; Higher education; Authentic assessment; Generative model","score_opus":0.11844690400859628,"score_gpt":0.48632596521768284,"score_spread":0.36787906120908653,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415696757","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02135781,0.010142048,0.09335892,0.6538814,0.0013229434,0.000099944504,0.00018737452,0.00038587695,0.21926379],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9158929,0.008884924,0.041644566,0.020433737,0.0011920708,0.00033047076,0.00015033573,0.0001480424,0.0113230245],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9903542,0.0063379426,0.0003640598,0.00079615024,0.0015788027,0.00056880765],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9584731,0.025148677,0.0037171033,0.004099195,0.0050954167,0.003466615],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017410079,0.00055962376,0.0007438783,0.003172689,0.0042495276,0.017656649,0.0028946963,0.005804601,0.012605301],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024441654,0.00028019494,0.00087715435,0.0034845022,0.043937635,0.026501084,0.0061011524,0.00863336,0.0023369207],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013004468,0.000017890423,0.000756991,0.000054370597,0.000004050304,0.000016827764,0.0012268167,0.00028122097,0.00002856279,0.9850965,0.0020253374,0.010478593],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006415317,0.000018628278,0.00057077926,0.00021971163,0.0000058671003,0.000042554955,0.0028309783,0.002250274,0.00007954233,0.9645336,0.029425211,0.000016316879],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006657569,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0061544674,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9941954,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013450167,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016092043,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09758824},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415802279","doi":"10.1080/13562517.2025.2583456","title":"Neurodiversity and academic integrity: toward epistemic plurality in a postplagiarism era","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Teaching in Higher Education","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"University of Calgary","keywords":"Higher education; Research methodology; Knowledge production; Discourse analysis","score_opus":0.05738837636974892,"score_gpt":0.3717563087212384,"score_spread":0.31436793235148947,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415802279","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3369056,0.18529792,0.092457026,0.19212398,0.0016220352,0.00045473684,0.00021276166,0.0002352876,0.19069064],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95823526,0.026249923,0.0074577234,0.004135089,0.00028826323,0.00017136036,0.000052032,0.000030235651,0.0033801328],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.93676865,0.04378352,0.0054871403,0.0025813049,0.009840843,0.0015386344],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.79241014,0.15170453,0.025476879,0.009456243,0.017986713,0.0029655583],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.061191525,0.0004377613,0.0008140074,0.0074011358,0.0055574435,0.01725018,0.0025890404,0.003399012,0.0021396566],"category_scores_gemma":[0.13889724,0.0004595109,0.0008790993,0.005493009,0.020596335,0.021234654,0.016552307,0.0047161304,0.0002826842],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009761554,0.00007619952,0.024002569,0.006767179,0.0001968446,0.0018194484,0.24250443,0.0005279181,0.0007197009,0.4743761,0.004458608,0.24445346],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000032280237,0.00030006177,0.015079899,0.025178675,0.00038449228,0.004018155,0.28218868,0.0009590258,0.004397309,0.3183964,0.34889355,0.00017156998],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019261194,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0036649185,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.996601,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006920158,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0197121,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3236156},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["research_integrity","sts"],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["research_integrity"],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"commentary","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W4415896902","doi":"10.1016/j.tsc.2025.102051","title":"Colloquial engagement theory with AI awareness (CET-AIA): A new creative pedagogical framework for ethical assessment in the age of artificial intelligence","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Thinking Skills and Creativity","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Global Affairs Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Cheating; Honesty; Sociocultural evolution; Normative; Cognition; Deception; Generative grammar; Empirical research","score_opus":0.0749133597293107,"score_gpt":0.4381027646963655,"score_spread":0.3631894049670548,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415896902","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018002553,0.00039950197,0.94310045,0.0053731115,0.00026249123,0.0006214367,0.000028159411,0.00048082767,0.031731546],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.33747777,0.0004695327,0.65060693,0.0011882832,0.00017967017,0.0016190028,0.0000665699,0.00015687813,0.008235511],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.985919,0.009865081,0.00057054154,0.0011909453,0.0021092803,0.0003451013],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96712846,0.023108331,0.0022519284,0.0035650413,0.0019265237,0.0020196592],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017397415,0.0009892526,0.00051812787,0.0016696698,0.0016915366,0.006382648,0.0023752034,0.0024195898,0.0050546858],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0293934,0.00047654333,0.001152896,0.00052803726,0.011124941,0.0068682358,0.010765849,0.004619588,0.0010896184],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000059835038,0.00066958566,0.005168358,0.0007143061,0.00005270171,0.00034848307,0.043299902,0.0049011395,0.008040326,0.6613228,0.0049444176,0.27047828],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006382539,0.00041303135,0.002588334,0.0008173058,0.00004454124,0.00095528463,0.008425458,0.034998357,0.0058249235,0.80207676,0.1436633,0.00012877096],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004499498,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008310692,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9975804,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002204618,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004362343,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09200746},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4415953551","doi":"10.34172/rdme.025.33263","title":"Education on whistleblowing in medicine: A scoping review","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research and Development in Medical Education","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia","keywords":"Thematic analysis; Inclusion (mineral); Preparedness; Scope (computer science); Grey literature; Higher education; Best practice","score_opus":0.09700595560527173,"score_gpt":0.5339105605559067,"score_spread":0.436904604950635,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4415953551","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0007663526,0.996885,0.00022414234,0.00073128566,0.00020564436,0.00033780088,0.0001286952,0.0000074372665,0.00071360014],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0043744575,0.99406564,0.00046603064,0.00039440845,0.00008545419,0.0004261819,0.00009798885,0.000003964962,0.000085841115],"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","domain_scores_codex":[0.98526716,0.0048539108,0.005838978,0.0007758391,0.0028208836,0.00044322282],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8941094,0.086578846,0.009993629,0.0010853455,0.0074835117,0.00074921525],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02108123,0.0016645374,0.0052507534,0.027675822,0.0017988381,0.0051609697,0.0024970009,0.0042279684,0.004763453],"category_scores_gemma":[0.098562546,0.0014736827,0.004815704,0.0285498,0.0020922688,0.0055833342,0.0034136225,0.0020224776,0.0006801355],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":"systematic_review","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000076593176,0.00003613405,0.00068547006,0.86446404,0.0012042566,0.00018004091,0.001479032,0.00011705423,0.00017697264,0.00080861914,0.003405339,0.12736651],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011618493,0.00003285804,0.0007499765,0.98248714,0.0025236902,0.000120227545,0.00055285107,0.000025786268,0.00006169085,0.00018745915,0.013237019,0.0000096010435],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008182312,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017233746,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.995772,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005529039,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02605265,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416109732","doi":"10.1145/3776558","title":"Did Alice Do Wrong? Cross-Cultural Differences in Student Perceptions of Generative AI Use in University Computing Education","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"ACM Transactions on Computing Education","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"The Scarborough Hospital; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Perception; Cultural diversity; Higher education; Generative grammar; Coding (social sciences); Cultural competence; Power (physics); Generative model; Ethical code; Cross-cultural","score_opus":0.028390498847919506,"score_gpt":0.3817625841504599,"score_spread":0.3533720853025404,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416109732","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.999022,0.000048439815,0.000087128916,0.00014564028,0.0000057125253,0.0000057180414,0.00000856423,0.0000015380274,0.0006751831],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995809,0.000074661,0.00006333914,0.00007485036,0.0000015682524,0.0000050678823,0.000010399859,0.000002549023,0.00018660794],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9936579,0.0028043953,0.0004782976,0.0004222749,0.0018144592,0.00082267635],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97699934,0.009871549,0.004971593,0.0009199962,0.003988042,0.0032494247],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0091336565,0.0002844493,0.00036594324,0.0012739877,0.0022174139,0.004500443,0.00057202077,0.00068044604,0.0019083387],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02527035,0.00027355342,0.0003942547,0.0010142389,0.0039779204,0.001685822,0.0023549632,0.0013836088,0.0002978122],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019891154,0.000186638,0.5707642,0.00007757114,0.00006902453,0.0003349771,0.40881103,0.00016962238,0.001344123,0.0006891801,0.00052606635,0.016828628],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009201563,0.0002669079,0.28023458,0.0001233426,0.00003437345,0.00037271646,0.71299034,0.0006242353,0.0010206482,0.00044616914,0.0037846495,0.00009290919],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02695358,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.040579587,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99931955,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025059697,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027700327,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.053593397},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416152088","doi":"10.1016/j.jagp.2025.10.004","title":"Authorial Integrity in the Age of Artificial Intelligence: A Scientific Autobiography","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Microsoft","keywords":"Obligation; Biography; Scientific writing; The Internet; Personally identifiable information; Quarter (Canadian coin); Academic integrity; Professional writing","score_opus":0.018726651715872476,"score_gpt":0.33240396378731324,"score_spread":0.3136773120714408,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416152088","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015677406,0.056998145,0.004348852,0.8329377,0.0122449435,0.000016656208,0.00007179836,0.00006345314,0.07764106],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7251181,0.047322746,0.0032258276,0.15611275,0.048516106,0.000053850996,0.00004896372,0.00018936254,0.019412298],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99495244,0.0026461824,0.0003815133,0.00058657024,0.0009738335,0.0004594154],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95524615,0.031434216,0.0032411898,0.003953242,0.0038871025,0.0022380403],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0120908525,0.00038799434,0.0005679692,0.0020150037,0.007862295,0.009389232,0.0011487593,0.009508957,0.002917306],"category_scores_gemma":[0.040778797,0.0003197948,0.00037367948,0.001678241,0.054460917,0.020714525,0.00488865,0.02613972,0.0006770016],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000050072344,0.0000459523,0.0013665279,0.00014055155,0.000023695422,0.0005747427,0.08060202,0.00013375223,0.00021554001,0.76436615,0.123722725,0.028758302],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000135737555,0.00003466835,0.0011787215,0.000574113,0.000012771165,0.001470656,0.019329593,0.0002772456,0.00028919356,0.24029143,0.7364819,0.000046078098],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002453517,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002228802,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99049103,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035131557,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0043129204,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06394327},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416222729","doi":"10.2196/73469","title":"Evaluating the Performance of DeepSeek-R1 and DeepSeek-V3 Versus OpenAI Models in the Chinese National Medical Licensing Examination: Cross-Sectional Comparative Study","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"JMIR Medical Education","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Licensure","score_opus":0.09535028815819191,"score_gpt":0.5095570624048554,"score_spread":0.4142067742466635,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416222729","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99635506,0.0002805904,0.0013870144,0.00022891643,0.000025452919,0.00009777631,0.00085065665,0.00005263175,0.0007218676],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958007,0.00013814829,0.0013915423,0.00011069499,0.000021994698,0.00015291739,0.0018620251,0.000022522556,0.00049949775],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99325186,0.0034141466,0.0006133207,0.0011403564,0.001199981,0.00038023447],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.959047,0.024804052,0.0041508456,0.0030048243,0.0070347013,0.0019585716],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021971216,0.0008064144,0.00087853614,0.0013399567,0.0005573268,0.001332336,0.0012358133,0.00086548814,0.0025857647],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05073969,0.0004006279,0.0017588816,0.0008443096,0.00073766755,0.0026534987,0.0018218117,0.0017275343,0.00090291194],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007614978,0.00082532124,0.961452,0.00018019625,0.00041918663,0.00008853981,0.0014166647,0.002983559,0.0003039497,0.00026683192,0.0019229652,0.029379392],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001815837,0.002911519,0.9008674,0.00027935748,0.00093469105,0.00032785622,0.003690077,0.08300575,0.002649439,0.0010680096,0.003942303,0.00014198186],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013007384,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011723445,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021971216,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016038525,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001989684,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.116196275},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416263102","doi":"10.55016/ojs/cpai.v8i4.81528","title":"Applying Text Analysis for Detecting Academic Misconduct on a Statistics Exam","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Perspectives on Academic Integrity","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Mount Saint Vincent University","funders":"","keywords":"Levenshtein distance; Similarity (geometry); Misconduct; Plagiarism detection; Academic dishonesty; Component (thermodynamics)","score_opus":0.05064526208466842,"score_gpt":0.3563301917343592,"score_spread":0.3056849296496908,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416263102","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7195097,0.0013619448,0.1909009,0.002695638,0.00081118906,0.0038726155,0.011144015,0.004150718,0.065553255],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7931234,0.00060109363,0.19097582,0.00035071583,0.0003326444,0.0012155472,0.0047717663,0.00026382564,0.008365156],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.97927123,0.0063023255,0.003510135,0.0017233756,0.008571534,0.00062147086],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.81044334,0.10219327,0.027134815,0.010820516,0.04682066,0.0025873769],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020100076,0.00057806337,0.0006212703,0.031989407,0.002928771,0.004271555,0.0016013135,0.0012286116,0.0049922788],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1532324,0.00023229957,0.00047079095,0.01866196,0.0013825182,0.0036014055,0.002800843,0.001408914,0.0025108783],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005417323,0.00049112603,0.20389134,0.0016942371,0.00020414282,0.0018723686,0.043308597,0.0024213688,0.020768167,0.020803025,0.021730071,0.68227386],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012645099,0.0015053716,0.53719497,0.0014843527,0.00031270666,0.003497161,0.08759181,0.09334418,0.059064496,0.051390946,0.16370362,0.0007839965],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013543185,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020539906,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99877137,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025091532,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004719043,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10630059},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416338022","doi":"10.51746/9789612977238","title":"ENRIO 2025: Congress on Research Integrity Practice. Research Integrity, Power Dynamics and Safe Institutional Culture","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research; HORIZON EUROPE Framework Programme; Ministry of National Education and Religious Affairs; Women's College Research Institute; Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Berlin University Alliance; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; European Commission; Hellenic Academic Libraries Link","keywords":"Research integrity; Relevance (law); Research ethics; Power (physics); Government (linguistics); Human research","score_opus":0.11471740377226099,"score_gpt":0.4620217972183235,"score_spread":0.3473043934460625,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416338022","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0013276023,0.1378993,0.0015766484,0.07605307,0.038384672,0.00014971505,0.00038478384,0.00029938598,0.743925],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.012988223,0.019886807,0.0019213096,0.026959574,0.0066932635,0.00025293522,0.00059128884,0.0002539964,0.9304525],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969183,0.0009542548,0.00014576601,0.0002854594,0.0012843781,0.00041178384],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99756396,0.0009303186,0.00022084144,0.00021765287,0.000530005,0.0005372236],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004543363,0.00082318444,0.000431483,0.0018192139,0.0032939343,0.010292385,0.001815891,0.006371221,0.031994324],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0058285296,0.00040527832,0.000523065,0.0023878466,0.0030379533,0.00518627,0.005138356,0.006291416,0.013317859],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011368652,0.000014553436,0.00008221495,0.00018206747,0.000002151758,0.000051353312,0.00068200764,0.00005639596,0.00014605513,0.061502974,0.90956306,0.027705831],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000010500131,0.0000022908293,0.00014716627,0.0001262325,3.7159353e-7,0.00002505433,0.00012450285,0.0000063140333,0.000021183121,0.000762723,0.99878055,0.0000025051404],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005989563,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014713045,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9936288,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005864393,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009080444,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10703164},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416557103","doi":"10.55016/ojs/cpai.v8i5.81226","title":"From plagiarism to progress: Assessing remote delivery of a post-discipline academic integrity intervention","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Perspectives on Academic Integrity","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"University of Manitoba","keywords":"Academic integrity; Misconduct; Academic dishonesty; Intervention (counseling); Academic institution; Learning development; Higher education; Institution; Academic achievement","score_opus":0.02733416348570393,"score_gpt":0.36272744976499594,"score_spread":0.335393286279292,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416557103","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9853221,0.00032041984,0.0017046956,0.0013784647,0.00011533134,0.0018473475,0.0001474303,0.00021879238,0.008945346],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98823345,0.00045000258,0.0061749388,0.000496709,0.000039839,0.0023611009,0.00011844196,0.000027749209,0.0020977326],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98474264,0.0077792564,0.0010990794,0.0011017423,0.0039724126,0.0013049071],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94967926,0.021330064,0.01184721,0.0030487687,0.0067271916,0.0073675057],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019052498,0.0004858025,0.000769105,0.0012995346,0.002307054,0.002289075,0.0021092573,0.0015422087,0.005944551],"category_scores_gemma":[0.094200395,0.00044852163,0.0008341331,0.0007621276,0.0019052629,0.0024447355,0.0030893323,0.0030110404,0.0011816319],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0027958197,0.026078733,0.16486578,0.0032532737,0.0003252526,0.0004142395,0.10985789,0.0012596622,0.003924081,0.0012594202,0.0064990064,0.6794669],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009829722,0.047159564,0.81896985,0.0027791883,0.0005451957,0.00059826457,0.08755494,0.0031511046,0.0069433637,0.0019772097,0.028990628,0.0003477748],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0071540587,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01292936,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9984578,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029419956,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009652742,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1007604},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416607654","doi":"10.5256/f1000research.6480.r7411","title":"Referee report. For: Every scientist is a memory researcher: Suggestions for making research more memorable [v1; approved with reservations 1, http://f1000r.es/500]","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Faculty of 1000 Research Ltd","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; University of Alberta","keywords":"Work (physics); Government (linguistics)","score_opus":0.2588369043586124,"score_gpt":0.4826989401503139,"score_spread":0.2238620357917015,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416607654","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00049904484,0.0018995986,0.0037429987,0.4268768,0.46647933,0.0013465116,0.022857323,0.004738214,0.07156015],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.011030004,0.0023881553,0.0053362516,0.180847,0.0841395,0.0025359222,0.0102036055,0.0035114526,0.7000081],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9909003,0.0017578853,0.0011717044,0.0010755371,0.0044938736,0.000600729],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.79759634,0.029827967,0.003245935,0.008719899,0.15561432,0.0049954485],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008686594,0.0012994034,0.0017915964,0.0034990117,0.005733959,0.005096111,0.0033818637,0.010303573,0.46159843],"category_scores_gemma":[0.19023684,0.0007211084,0.0016384629,0.002869301,0.0014006924,0.0029371502,0.003159154,0.0075078416,0.30715066],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000066969083,0.0000032680732,0.000015960259,0.000031215728,0.0000017408458,0.000027116996,0.000022914184,0.0000033478586,0.000038439088,0.00020622136,0.9982521,0.0013909612],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000041447685,0.000012720064,0.00073663803,0.0002187038,0.0000179592,0.00017775102,0.00025212343,0.00009776469,0.00023686542,0.0017305481,0.99642855,0.000048849513],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02606758,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.038687706,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9913134,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007066381,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007338862,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7679645},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416613148","doi":"10.1080/02602938.2025.2587246","title":"What should we be assessing exactly? Higher education staff narratives on gen AI integration of assessment in a postplagiarism era","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Calgary Laboratory Services; Brock University; University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Higher education; Narrative; Qualitative research; Professional development; Semi-structured interview; Focus group; Educational assessment","score_opus":0.11281127226536691,"score_gpt":0.49540280718684077,"score_spread":0.38259153492147385,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416613148","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.83311456,0.002384093,0.01826515,0.11382619,0.00054437644,0.00013044493,0.00007812225,0.00012505955,0.03153202],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9936836,0.00034595846,0.0013613048,0.0022725759,0.00003635046,0.000035520934,0.000010537184,0.000025655037,0.0022284915],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9396603,0.048255596,0.0021830217,0.0019523418,0.004668076,0.0032807041],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.89935464,0.07342859,0.007970442,0.0031821746,0.008671414,0.007392831],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05306284,0.0006265362,0.00062993175,0.0015951305,0.018732905,0.011245144,0.0018385086,0.0042322725,0.0014310014],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08082472,0.0006648882,0.00030733377,0.0014158727,0.03369857,0.012013602,0.013041342,0.0095569305,0.0003556586],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017520515,0.000014802179,0.0016269144,0.000058255147,0.0000019900972,0.00036632287,0.9755494,0.000054606622,0.00030465526,0.016139742,0.0010776911,0.0047881096],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004135424,0.00003951368,0.001401852,0.00033406937,0.0000044561684,0.00033069198,0.9397187,0.00027320298,0.00086276274,0.008071923,0.048927065,0.000031621556],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008130379,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009514097,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9957677,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015550612,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011905431,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28062648},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416816556","doi":"10.5539/hes.v15n4p574","title":"Reviewer Acknowledgements for Higher Education Studies, Vol. 15, No. 4","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"Higher Education Studies","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Higher education; State (computer science); Viet nam; University education; Quality (philosophy)","score_opus":0.08141700312580857,"score_gpt":0.43591751021078756,"score_spread":0.354500507084979,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416816556","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00023313327,0.0055153314,0.0025144944,0.13762462,0.8435465,0.0010830859,0.00059647526,0.00072136824,0.008164907],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.013754919,0.017218804,0.011325521,0.15844081,0.63320655,0.0071744574,0.002405567,0.0033888544,0.15308456],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.91223574,0.023740288,0.016099267,0.0055440464,0.03991805,0.0024626334],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.22718845,0.045121677,0.020759664,0.014685464,0.6760815,0.016163256],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.069845416,0.00295861,0.0040898253,0.011162473,0.00589242,0.014773237,0.0050808997,0.0073989257,0.09682812],"category_scores_gemma":[0.4956365,0.0012126461,0.0031716542,0.0067024254,0.0030920736,0.008352922,0.005122696,0.008733731,0.06296194],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019226913,0.000005140011,0.00013592398,0.00041427172,0.000011129605,0.000039396964,0.00013865801,0.000008873397,0.00003786981,0.00041595678,0.9864486,0.012324962],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030563304,0.000020316043,0.00044311082,0.0016861189,0.000030284218,0.00027938146,0.0005048819,0.00009160614,0.00008690101,0.001018639,0.9957695,0.000038702347],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017329967,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027833646,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09682812,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006759745,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01838773,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36938226},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4416829178","doi":"10.55016/ojs/cpai.v8i6.81117","title":"Teaching and learning at the intersection of artificial intelligence, academic integrity, and assessment innovation: A rapid scoping review protocol","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Perspectives on Academic Integrity","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary; University of Winnipeg","funders":"","keywords":"Protocol (science); Situated; Intersection (aeronautics); Systematic review; Best practice; Accountability; Protocol analysis","score_opus":0.058263222778197024,"score_gpt":0.4176942297246086,"score_spread":0.3594310069464116,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4416829178","genre_codex":"protocol","genre_gemma":"protocol","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"protocol","genre_consensus":"protocol","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00029945603,0.0005821642,0.002128777,0.00071921566,0.00022697814,0.9922915,0.0028462638,0.00011841712,0.00078729336],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00021341677,0.00030343662,0.0031620872,0.00015389625,0.000017282497,0.9956182,0.00026492702,0.000009637835,0.00025701028],"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.8742529,0.0631713,0.03752154,0.006923735,0.013063563,0.0050669042],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.79706645,0.0861714,0.023373622,0.027350482,0.060273003,0.005765049],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.20171751,0.0047589815,0.0099184355,0.020388186,0.0070574605,0.010448068,0.006275704,0.011849492,0.084579326],"category_scores_gemma":[0.23304677,0.0072695916,0.010858186,0.017143905,0.007167399,0.012098414,0.009293144,0.009558361,0.024407325],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0105155995,0.0011296131,0.0017420353,0.57541555,0.0013786232,0.0026143289,0.021920387,0.0029032275,0.0046023754,0.027008,0.17781913,0.17295113],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.021194585,0.0018683252,0.0068787425,0.30903932,0.0020594036,0.0008294004,0.011544917,0.0018506267,0.003515394,0.03374426,0.60656375,0.0009112774],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0063656666,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015088578,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98815054,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016933382,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08941264,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9844244},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W56880762","doi":"","title":"Plagiarism self-reported rates, understandings, and education among teacher candidates in a faculty of education","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarship at UWindsor (University of Windsor)","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Medical education; Psychology; Teacher education; Pedagogy; Higher education; Mathematics education; Medicine; Political science","score_opus":0.029276412480083787,"score_gpt":0.2954307200729875,"score_spread":0.2661543075929037,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W56880762","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99919957,0.000044405853,0.000035012097,0.000065651504,0.000001504721,0.000012920191,0.000056758643,0.0000028667332,0.0005813348],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999008,0.000090692265,0.00008271567,0.000021726428,0.0000049153377,0.000018519551,0.0001017264,0.0000016785527,0.00067006407],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99598444,0.00094680104,0.00058505544,0.00026937394,0.0017504515,0.00046392012],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9467001,0.011262449,0.026495684,0.0018436495,0.008646209,0.0050520236],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005939107,0.00019264383,0.00034470955,0.0033297467,0.0018399942,0.0016070466,0.0006423569,0.00054921105,0.002359937],"category_scores_gemma":[0.037088018,0.00022550704,0.00027929829,0.0015524478,0.0010674268,0.0010576214,0.001388762,0.0009051011,0.00049055286],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037210557,0.00009960702,0.9737819,0.0000386791,0.000012489238,0.00007963958,0.020248128,0.000024827914,0.0003582392,0.000051406627,0.00022396154,0.0050439024],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000017851949,0.0001227046,0.97649413,0.000029115312,0.0000059548906,0.00016838063,0.022215936,0.00008287712,0.00022021227,0.00002673489,0.0006199463,0.000012208764],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019624418,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04233104,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9994508,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001611546,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017703235,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03902036},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"domain":"methods","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W59263885","doi":"","title":"Designing a vortal for detecting Java programs cyberplagiarism","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Conference on Internet Computing","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Lakehead University","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Java; Programming language","score_opus":0.0755772918499983,"score_gpt":0.3508650255070308,"score_spread":0.2752877336570325,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W59263885","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19616565,0.00034719572,0.70086163,0.0005756792,0.00013335996,0.0014433374,0.0011691669,0.09229626,0.0070077297],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.59405434,0.000106751344,0.3960198,0.0002491462,0.000040375522,0.0005173022,0.0013204447,0.001134761,0.006557167],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968092,0.00065295974,0.00034621594,0.0008180996,0.0010927335,0.00028066582],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9924567,0.002762802,0.0008656875,0.001482336,0.0020619566,0.00037066103],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00274114,0.00063917495,0.0006588378,0.003682394,0.0010332857,0.0029524826,0.0017047363,0.0013268819,0.004319796],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01219701,0.00068140775,0.0006393206,0.0009218885,0.000787631,0.0036785298,0.0019442535,0.00078563864,0.0023496768],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0018033147,0.0011058768,0.093662545,0.0010231615,0.0003043465,0.0006735269,0.0023800712,0.0113997385,0.14553274,0.010235163,0.01984739,0.71203214],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003192281,0.0018027955,0.02429638,0.00010362899,0.00026368827,0.000827395,0.0019546442,0.65553516,0.27091414,0.007283046,0.036531508,0.00016843344],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033210467,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0060950257,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99867314,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008882911,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017777255,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.014496744},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W597326641","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0127556","title":"Misconduct Policies, Academic Culture and Career Stage, Not Gender or Pressures to Publish, Affect Scientific Integrity","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PLoS ONE","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":272,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Publication; Misconduct; Scientific misconduct; Academic integrity; Honesty; Psychology; Publication bias; Social psychology; Law; Political science; Medicine; MEDLINE; Alternative medicine","score_opus":0.3281499515299024,"score_gpt":0.3703277328567112,"score_spread":0.04217778132680883,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W597326641","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98082215,0.0030356538,0.00093534164,0.0035793572,0.00012496448,0.00008184405,0.00040916953,0.00002931626,0.010982198],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99667156,0.0008413374,0.00071840524,0.0003088915,0.00009101456,0.000044165234,0.00009107795,0.000015762684,0.0012178763],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.97491425,0.013282661,0.0040463805,0.0014197577,0.0047966666,0.0015402377],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.4629044,0.30759108,0.17552818,0.016763125,0.022027956,0.01518528],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.031587757,0.00027297318,0.0006163527,0.0029388196,0.0019562477,0.0053285495,0.001360748,0.0013757134,0.00669158],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2572415,0.0003303385,0.0008531945,0.006005878,0.0022922659,0.0044386974,0.0023676688,0.001381083,0.0012817963],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00039050003,0.00021547901,0.96508735,0.0005109363,0.00020491386,0.0002986687,0.006083624,0.00019649943,0.0003878023,0.0011988584,0.0008926078,0.02453271],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000036421545,0.00041906894,0.9807053,0.0004009608,0.00016508345,0.00080318673,0.0082214,0.00047767087,0.0009873159,0.002647727,0.005083844,0.000052072093],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014076626,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023314273,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99862427,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012266904,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036341697,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16705406},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6884623220","doi":"10.11575/cpai.v1i1.43363.g30993","title":"Editorial","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Calgary","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Work (physics); Context (archaeology)","score_opus":0.00989704838721948,"score_gpt":0.2335221875941465,"score_spread":0.22362513920692703,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6884623220","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00008627707,0.0029731714,0.00009588786,0.05594141,0.930154,0.0000408806,0.00024342863,0.00010168143,0.010363211],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0031288078,0.00632645,0.00025638108,0.06775252,0.84446245,0.00004836647,0.00031941422,0.00014831634,0.077557355],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99427915,0.00044732273,0.00032791198,0.0007176783,0.0035014963,0.00072631775],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9664918,0.0039812257,0.0009879847,0.0014891508,0.021941803,0.005107996],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004360024,0.00171941,0.0015451573,0.002739274,0.0041216193,0.0072275647,0.003214777,0.008970355,0.051992726],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030854475,0.0006142386,0.001435714,0.0014435711,0.002800706,0.002481939,0.0013488445,0.010180732,0.022222796],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009061652,0.000002403291,0.000019238922,0.000040445575,0.0000028877253,0.000041559717,0.0000074746977,0.000005841014,0.000018248478,0.00017216842,0.99741864,0.002261943],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013303163,0.0000046616665,0.00018664841,0.00016056163,0.0000070688893,0.000095086805,0.000037845068,0.000025513356,0.00005669943,0.00019382691,0.99921155,0.0000072173357],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.060958672,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.124642625,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9480073,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010413797,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01385545,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6884625926","doi":"10.11575/cpai.v6i1.76921","title":"So it Happened… What Now?","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Calgary","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Misconduct; Academic integrity; Framing (construction); Academic achievement; Learning development; Higher education","score_opus":0.01924722871125473,"score_gpt":0.24817020200780332,"score_spread":0.2289229732965486,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6884625926","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08719998,0.0051221396,0.008435639,0.7395265,0.013785502,0.00017896,0.00021712104,0.00031622543,0.14521791],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.56650436,0.010726817,0.009995262,0.1754449,0.0023298932,0.00016280513,0.00041162802,0.00032697886,0.23409736],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9947707,0.0024625622,0.00013433404,0.00033905677,0.0012784757,0.0010147766],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9900755,0.0017330049,0.0013690183,0.00053561415,0.002449725,0.0038371016],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006321384,0.00043991485,0.00047039194,0.0005732884,0.0129870875,0.008492937,0.0016049624,0.004260164,0.01649437],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017225785,0.00026164792,0.00065609673,0.0007060112,0.009927365,0.0067880927,0.0059037823,0.011013316,0.006293109],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010248902,0.00048071137,0.031200802,0.00051977165,0.000054745535,0.003578653,0.25078407,0.00022738779,0.0026096196,0.06935496,0.45022407,0.19086275],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012569533,0.00018360082,0.008342473,0.0006639816,0.000029194065,0.0029346799,0.21656768,0.00020604972,0.0015535926,0.019803192,0.74961025,0.00009280704],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023656396,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.058639918,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9957398,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0069227275,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013605264,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05517912},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6884628878","doi":"10.11575/prism/41676","title":"Using Generative AI Ethically: Teaching, Learning, and Assessing in a Postplagiarism Era","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"Open MIND","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Generative grammar; Session (web analytics); Inclusion (mineral); Ethical issues; Key (lock); Perspective (graphical)","score_opus":0.08235221380432693,"score_gpt":0.44553485430208006,"score_spread":0.3631826404977531,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6884628878","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.043966606,0.012629528,0.031738933,0.74116063,0.0076282066,0.00020295531,0.00005563787,0.0009008364,0.16171663],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6503246,0.017789101,0.031599727,0.11598411,0.0031691368,0.0006140357,0.0001503963,0.00091728684,0.17945169],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9744134,0.016535792,0.0005266804,0.0006570378,0.005515125,0.0023520037],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9553554,0.026717754,0.0022137843,0.002725165,0.005546791,0.00744118],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03498556,0.00064812554,0.000556082,0.0017319468,0.016755454,0.01875512,0.0025000884,0.007106801,0.0073702303],"category_scores_gemma":[0.037422873,0.00053880975,0.0005049692,0.001159593,0.04324763,0.014276303,0.013223456,0.011910228,0.0029488367],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000377508,0.00017353076,0.0034578498,0.0002979949,0.000010914523,0.0008260177,0.40426925,0.00025182616,0.0012457801,0.1349496,0.22002701,0.23445247],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010595468,0.00006125748,0.002144217,0.00075619813,0.0000075565777,0.0006303992,0.10980646,0.00028265294,0.0012082173,0.07615084,0.8088812,0.00006041865],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015884373,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.057879593,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9928932,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017410528,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.025867078,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18502355},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6884638606","doi":"10.11575/cpai.v6i1.76517","title":"Broken Circle: Exploring Indigenous Perspectives of Academic Integrity","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Calgary","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Stewardship (theology); Institution; Academic integrity; Reciprocal; Indigenous culture; Structural integrity","score_opus":0.03519413544425242,"score_gpt":0.2565311930082418,"score_spread":0.22133705756398936,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6884638606","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.80740124,0.0065143313,0.005153729,0.03924221,0.00078675273,0.00020246636,0.000061040584,0.00006240361,0.14057578],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.979653,0.0029516744,0.000991167,0.0021020018,0.00008292856,0.000053804575,0.000014951253,0.000033413693,0.014117068],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9897563,0.00612603,0.00014854541,0.00040416815,0.001415614,0.0021494082],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9937271,0.003301497,0.00050007075,0.0002876503,0.00081124617,0.0013724512],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008986401,0.00065599545,0.0008611468,0.0024029913,0.055712283,0.0127603095,0.0028066651,0.003917435,0.004653228],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007903784,0.00048426134,0.00061308086,0.0020427005,0.038479242,0.009710136,0.016721748,0.010245546,0.0004866952],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000036458648,0.000007093779,0.00022135719,0.000018908013,0.0000013101802,0.00012894311,0.9923414,0.00001304503,0.000109346955,0.0055730795,0.0004399053,0.0011419599],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000010707045,0.000012102435,0.00038433576,0.00007399281,0.0000028382117,0.000120030716,0.9782154,0.000035840243,0.00008984203,0.0012731683,0.019782811,0.000008534859],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.23165077,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.359287,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99608254,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.026309617,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.023276277,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.46060485},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6884638738","doi":"10.11575/cpai.v5i2.75649","title":"Cheating: It depends how you define it","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Calgary","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cheating; Reputation; Perception; Academic integrity; Higher education; Mistake","score_opus":0.02029246994032534,"score_gpt":0.2319652809509841,"score_spread":0.21167281101065877,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6884638738","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1310149,0.022654165,0.04611588,0.5661819,0.011601785,0.00028728155,0.00033024477,0.00045823914,0.22135557],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8798239,0.007952943,0.011093815,0.07271743,0.0015855605,0.00015389756,0.00014865962,0.00046953233,0.026054375],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9773013,0.012398724,0.0012254695,0.0012338735,0.0054671234,0.002373472],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95240134,0.011139673,0.0069436375,0.0045727664,0.018472422,0.0064701694],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01387991,0.000743514,0.00082890416,0.0017081724,0.008260661,0.012598686,0.0012976262,0.0048453244,0.0047601084],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05775649,0.00032992868,0.0005939943,0.0015557375,0.030600773,0.014364083,0.005584947,0.011543499,0.0024664996],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000104112645,0.00017573494,0.04397332,0.00049497175,0.00012105472,0.0004809949,0.38186136,0.00030639832,0.0024244103,0.2779644,0.17431031,0.117782965],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016914282,0.00015169018,0.023314737,0.0019268568,0.00004986545,0.0015991642,0.2674037,0.0004994282,0.0009736994,0.09564635,0.6081259,0.0002916505],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021565296,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015044939,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9951547,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0053127594,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006770569,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07340485},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6884642139","doi":"10.11575/cpai.v5i1.75620","title":"Mobilizing Knowledge","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Calgary","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Academic integrity; Cheating; Academic dishonesty; Work (physics); Personal Integrity; Agency (philosophy)","score_opus":0.017947548428545654,"score_gpt":0.2460576374857358,"score_spread":0.22811008905719016,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6884642139","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0069609648,0.008298728,0.011695897,0.19875039,0.002533779,0.00006863883,0.00008118139,0.00011786594,0.77149254],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.72681993,0.015976485,0.010223858,0.03636042,0.0023988727,0.000166237,0.00024187895,0.0002970008,0.20751527],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9850638,0.005899786,0.00031112126,0.001106451,0.0046789404,0.0029399889],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9777609,0.009593811,0.0011360031,0.003150003,0.0043683983,0.0039909133],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014625685,0.0005948322,0.00062148285,0.003281543,0.018026039,0.02441272,0.0038584012,0.00837564,0.028129317],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027303742,0.00032068053,0.00062706345,0.0033644936,0.03941589,0.020760376,0.02485078,0.0061555207,0.0044017173],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013409884,0.000020315145,0.00029015873,0.00012294628,0.000009923622,0.0001866618,0.030741263,0.00019000677,0.00012954828,0.87273484,0.053586975,0.041973934],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007735987,0.000009961161,0.0001629925,0.0005016595,0.000006491835,0.00009385873,0.020147022,0.00016122128,0.00018172082,0.21559756,0.7631114,0.00001835219],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08024673,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09300802,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99162436,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.019800942,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.051889025,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15955931},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6884647754","doi":"10.11575/cpai.v6i1.76783","title":"Educating College Students on Academic Integrity: What Roles do Teachers Play in the Quebec Province?","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Calgary","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Academic integrity; Misconduct; Learning development; Higher education; Discipline; Academic dishonesty","score_opus":0.021312517777657226,"score_gpt":0.29604096656408835,"score_spread":0.2747284487864311,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6884647754","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8910934,0.0054705758,0.00044836878,0.07698519,0.0003413747,0.00009624141,0.0004654947,0.00004212238,0.025057172],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98801917,0.0013862967,0.00024783946,0.0042778673,0.000029986388,0.000027332148,0.00012913866,0.0000127655985,0.005869516],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9958674,0.0010405764,0.00008530411,0.00033787778,0.00076256786,0.0019063359],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98365223,0.0014738059,0.0013043017,0.00022535739,0.0040108627,0.009333366],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002824577,0.00026479142,0.0004827195,0.0012194639,0.024659675,0.006552093,0.0025732743,0.0021293752,0.0057501784],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006629726,0.00032794612,0.0003210063,0.0027393315,0.0061821877,0.0025223838,0.0029318095,0.0031949223,0.00041223655],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000238736,0.0005749001,0.54312783,0.0005663592,0.000053518073,0.0023527828,0.2669763,0.00037713195,0.001500613,0.008294008,0.052019395,0.123918496],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026293128,0.00010924214,0.39637643,0.000942426,0.000034806333,0.0002491237,0.535652,0.00040278776,0.00030223647,0.0005835019,0.065224946,0.000096265554],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99395895,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9978403,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9978706,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10703421,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14949861,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7765912},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6884648335","doi":"10.11575/cpai.v6i1.76882","title":"A Rapid Scoping Review on Academic Integrity and Algorithmic Writing Technologies","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Calgary","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Academic integrity; Presentation (obstetrics); Context (archaeology); Expansive; Academic writing; Higher education; Systematic review; Protocol (science)","score_opus":0.042404791047553694,"score_gpt":0.3041027490430743,"score_spread":0.26169795799552065,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6884648335","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005205762,0.5317928,0.1061546,0.10880455,0.029809838,0.1593567,0.01209561,0.0017378401,0.04504232],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.020379286,0.47779334,0.27929333,0.019535368,0.0037920144,0.18359613,0.006018578,0.00068533764,0.008906571],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","domain_scores_codex":[0.7869767,0.10493103,0.05438027,0.006306383,0.04463974,0.0027658388],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.4713423,0.29677922,0.03577578,0.024311572,0.16755588,0.004235259],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.23522139,0.0022147493,0.005145486,0.03905885,0.0057324744,0.015345377,0.004675827,0.007725443,0.014915846],"category_scores_gemma":[0.48195884,0.002870109,0.00818186,0.02955214,0.004190909,0.01571083,0.0128852,0.008014632,0.004863236],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00031010015,0.00009045918,0.00077937974,0.39483288,0.00096950855,0.00077523297,0.011702209,0.0008272611,0.0022353062,0.025772939,0.14567156,0.41603315],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013474106,0.00012709996,0.00074504357,0.5953274,0.0011558657,0.00033001666,0.0032567189,0.00028318443,0.0006615763,0.008670465,0.3891869,0.00012107311],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008167385,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024013026,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9922746,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017185565,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.114785686,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9431082},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6884668063","doi":"10.11575/prism/42920","title":"Equity, Diversity, Inclusion, Accessibility, Decolonization and Indigenization in Academic and Research Integrity: Policy, Procedure, and Praxis","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"Open MIND","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Praxis; Indigenization; Misconduct; Cheating; Equity (law); Decolonization; Higher education; Discipline","score_opus":0.15752752332291814,"score_gpt":0.49199914218917856,"score_spread":0.3344716188662604,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6884668063","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004650038,0.015433022,0.030063711,0.8803793,0.007313859,0.0004907348,0.00006114117,0.00017118284,0.06143698],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.45170617,0.04322153,0.06494918,0.3319858,0.013900889,0.006970009,0.00014741077,0.0010912789,0.086027764],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.81839246,0.12771396,0.009185252,0.010082375,0.024416167,0.010209783],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.80332494,0.15211214,0.006578966,0.013831798,0.018514415,0.0056377435],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.19095133,0.0016966035,0.0029220309,0.0043442193,0.03949773,0.061951984,0.008240859,0.031015648,0.007706579],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1438301,0.0017597709,0.0021022963,0.0063279597,0.21873507,0.053295333,0.037883542,0.06295128,0.0023929498],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000105385125,0.000022353224,0.00018868709,0.00016390432,0.0000055257233,0.00007432395,0.036333963,0.00007420419,0.0001327753,0.939603,0.0136631895,0.0097274445],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019443149,0.000089459296,0.0005822336,0.0027551332,0.000026255548,0.00030305336,0.096236035,0.00041977802,0.0007545621,0.51119107,0.38745654,0.00016640482],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.029955583,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020892434,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96898437,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03487942,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07046762,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99770105},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6884669082","doi":"10.11575/cpai.v1i2.54599.g42964","title":"Academic Integrity across the Canadian Landscape","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Calgary","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Academic integrity; Nature versus nurture; Center (category theory); Personal Integrity; Data integrity","score_opus":0.021057498341192957,"score_gpt":0.2732196085520171,"score_spread":0.25216211021082413,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6884669082","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10610498,0.018382858,0.0024259484,0.36949518,0.0016324165,0.00013303112,0.0005763768,0.00027903504,0.5009703],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9024404,0.013085658,0.0019994713,0.025730837,0.00032756553,0.00005379536,0.00025020662,0.00015337154,0.05595866],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.97861594,0.0032204762,0.00047714938,0.0016518836,0.008343933,0.007690629],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95240015,0.0033230267,0.0020439907,0.0011736117,0.02098028,0.020078976],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009824868,0.0005068492,0.0007716336,0.0053609693,0.08905559,0.024247205,0.0032331129,0.0041107317,0.016298402],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024198538,0.00054916396,0.0006795812,0.009915561,0.028316593,0.0065066796,0.013451161,0.008686647,0.0012252738],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012429082,0.000110880625,0.024638519,0.00044454515,0.00006584482,0.0012476367,0.09138676,0.000746165,0.0006975326,0.50432336,0.17529824,0.20091623],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021628319,0.000051837844,0.03730062,0.0008783767,0.000046981266,0.00036032114,0.09369723,0.0003615279,0.00039842134,0.024468683,0.8422271,0.00018726259],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9900136,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9951624,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99588925,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.2219857,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.47912228,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9023863},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6887701924","doi":"10.17605/osf.io/95q6r","title":"Investigating academic integrity in the Werklund School of Education: Process, policy and perceptions","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints)","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Academic integrity; Academic dishonesty; Scholarship; Certificate; Higher education; Perception; Academic advising; Graduate students","score_opus":0.02330786262813849,"score_gpt":0.3454967278226579,"score_spread":0.3221888651945194,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6887701924","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9532283,0.0017310722,0.0012751722,0.02236706,0.000103877304,0.00011581346,0.000049638562,0.000030507646,0.021098644],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99502903,0.00048595382,0.0003278393,0.0010343585,0.000026727921,0.000054299533,0.000021927575,0.000015650843,0.0030041595],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.95208365,0.0224072,0.0024167094,0.0033175123,0.012553487,0.0072215158],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8651208,0.063665345,0.030436264,0.0054540187,0.014462354,0.020861074],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05265078,0.00026640142,0.0008832327,0.0047213593,0.020282036,0.022668645,0.0022191869,0.0041733505,0.006190238],"category_scores_gemma":[0.090843216,0.00074209407,0.0003126498,0.0055337977,0.02157913,0.016825112,0.017138837,0.008002343,0.0011953595],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008299889,0.00033237427,0.1134346,0.00021981625,0.000013527673,0.0005956237,0.80581206,0.00010464262,0.00068218325,0.034090333,0.0038758419,0.04075603],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011740176,0.00009954417,0.039553933,0.0003757073,0.0000071139075,0.00023058284,0.904841,0.00019630585,0.0009242435,0.0056444015,0.04807154,0.000043882574],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0142519325,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014247022,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99582666,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0210237,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0302816,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27844727},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6887730962","doi":"10.17605/osf.io/98wfm","title":"Academic Integrity in the Canadian Context: A Comprehensive Literature Review 1992-2017","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints)","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Academic integrity; Research integrity; Personal Integrity; Work (physics); Academic dishonesty; Context (archaeology)","score_opus":0.038296574423064535,"score_gpt":0.3336232378740422,"score_spread":0.29532666345097763,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6887730962","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018504607,0.9159738,0.00036332465,0.023355735,0.00093104644,0.00011881806,0.007856579,0.00003836114,0.032857783],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.14917517,0.8404708,0.00077261636,0.003413148,0.00033322145,0.00007642281,0.0023093533,0.0000413049,0.0034079938],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","domain_scores_codex":[0.9851659,0.0012702588,0.001547168,0.0011805145,0.008704618,0.0021315936],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8781149,0.022869159,0.009380265,0.0014130399,0.0824741,0.0057485667],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011622537,0.0009903772,0.0020514666,0.033475924,0.010521141,0.013922108,0.0032608355,0.0025160164,0.0075029074],"category_scores_gemma":[0.055503923,0.00089585077,0.0013921069,0.09851968,0.0068762256,0.005734383,0.0038955088,0.0032376186,0.0006675724],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00035392062,0.00012626205,0.07988977,0.0733211,0.0009958338,0.0017067728,0.03174735,0.0012751614,0.00047177693,0.06399763,0.24561515,0.50049925],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000031306987,0.000037578953,0.21482722,0.06260607,0.0010177898,0.00052078295,0.030239359,0.0002662,0.0004142097,0.002695685,0.68709964,0.00024410467],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99235183,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99602157,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99748397,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.21065468,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.52731687,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9155287},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6887757072","doi":"10.17605/osf.io/ftw8c","title":"Collaborative Open Resources on Research Integrity and Ethics (CORRIE)","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints)","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Academic integrity; Vulnerability (computing); Research ethics; Resource (disambiguation); Ethical issues; Compliance (psychology); Perception; Asynchronous communication","score_opus":0.1030662042004797,"score_gpt":0.4283141057801043,"score_spread":0.32524790157962463,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6887757072","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007012177,0.0037788895,0.12745096,0.07495261,0.010814055,0.0032526115,0.0036633485,0.008702668,0.76037276],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.06196721,0.004240988,0.16695823,0.01642473,0.0043104533,0.005863904,0.004305457,0.0050105616,0.73091847],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9799801,0.010082834,0.00094342255,0.0016703949,0.0056493804,0.0016737707],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.90734196,0.042325206,0.0028651236,0.017806277,0.01401637,0.015645035],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03893465,0.0010009235,0.0011881307,0.0015478912,0.0036883575,0.011294228,0.0036262707,0.0039424435,0.16696346],"category_scores_gemma":[0.072664395,0.000639654,0.000865913,0.0013706426,0.004804734,0.0071073263,0.022329668,0.005913945,0.070586294],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000108052525,0.00023106547,0.00026348722,0.0004862341,0.000010757128,0.00020077184,0.0047549484,0.00054101436,0.00079382875,0.066237815,0.6515293,0.27484283],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018134893,0.00003441362,0.00022313908,0.00034582676,0.000002595793,0.00009010528,0.00065489626,0.0001760505,0.0003562685,0.016216507,0.98186505,0.00001709147],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020927826,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005339704,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99605757,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005919818,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.021481553,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.55854845},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6894076990","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.6912519","title":"From plagiarism to predatory publishing: Organizational factors in explaining academic misconduct","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Misconduct; Sanctions; Context (archaeology); Publishing; Academic community; Academic dishonesty","score_opus":0.07256144297269186,"score_gpt":0.2961646314511977,"score_spread":0.22360318847850585,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6894076990","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9897669,0.0005998795,0.0014070306,0.0017009443,0.000032400858,0.00007718845,0.000110722045,0.000020311589,0.0062846118],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99904627,0.00015216673,0.0003453523,0.00006112587,0.000037074147,0.000017670774,0.000049340386,0.000005482766,0.00028556146],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98007524,0.008138082,0.0030529131,0.0012325195,0.0060950024,0.0014063308],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.5508564,0.24110185,0.15316935,0.018474624,0.016493099,0.019904679],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0145588145,0.00050054694,0.00062638783,0.0071983933,0.0026680098,0.0050839353,0.0015768042,0.0016505497,0.007417724],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11246153,0.0003629444,0.0008584854,0.006077274,0.00434491,0.0031208552,0.003964256,0.0027997713,0.00085995294],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006517269,0.0002296064,0.9896746,0.00006352324,0.00006382553,0.0001569652,0.0024873188,0.00022913828,0.000063943786,0.0005250588,0.00017475664,0.006266097],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000841481,0.00013017803,0.9903037,0.00011228182,0.00005669614,0.00032693,0.0047666966,0.0012649354,0.000119437,0.0019434112,0.0009468079,0.00002064258],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0064976206,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006221307,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9983494,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019992741,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004646636,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07699525},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6894162561","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.7930524","title":"Artificial Intelligence, New Technologies, and Academic Integrity Concerns: A Positive Fightback Through Teaching Effectiveness and Reinforced Learning","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"Academic dishonesty; Work (physics); Information technology; Active learning (machine learning); Experiential learning; Academic integrity; Higher education","score_opus":0.0847770855994783,"score_gpt":0.3435126652406578,"score_spread":0.25873557964117955,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6894162561","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8593445,0.0017322908,0.013193393,0.017200148,0.00017337856,0.000106853935,0.00002443632,0.00012352651,0.10810161],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99513865,0.0002359671,0.0013263433,0.00039887163,0.000029399018,0.00001577357,0.0000064170467,0.0000124342905,0.0028361122],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9854866,0.008967914,0.00038032114,0.00047127827,0.00406983,0.00062412024],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96993655,0.015682992,0.0063188984,0.003607855,0.0020718288,0.0023818305],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010273183,0.00021888892,0.00027067057,0.0010203243,0.002784352,0.0077189244,0.0006530259,0.0011898618,0.005602484],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02417203,0.00014978126,0.00031088127,0.0007197833,0.0053422195,0.0050679888,0.0048004743,0.0024452726,0.0006481135],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008365763,0.0023422814,0.12484261,0.0008012576,0.00017963817,0.0005940853,0.070773095,0.00090447697,0.009443707,0.11947882,0.006352839,0.6634506],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002817041,0.0068658213,0.32318074,0.0018523465,0.0003366785,0.0048728115,0.16764432,0.00946814,0.045900565,0.19854555,0.24073248,0.00031881643],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003651435,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005794935,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9988101,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016810361,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00257992,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05433047},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6901860899","doi":"10.60692/c7yy3-3f587","title":"Pedagogical strategy for scholarly communication literacy and avoiding deceptive publishing practices","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Greater South Information System","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Scholarly communication; Literacy; Project commissioning; Perspective (graphical); Information literacy; Key (lock)","score_opus":0.24576384697025816,"score_gpt":0.38379404927705835,"score_spread":0.1380302023068002,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6901860899","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.30747655,0.002596182,0.29688266,0.13441293,0.0019465358,0.0041555353,0.000060247152,0.0020699634,0.2503994],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.73348624,0.001666967,0.22757837,0.009371352,0.0005530833,0.0022098566,0.00004555092,0.000116157826,0.024972413],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99036646,0.0066116066,0.00041782274,0.0005191435,0.0016183876,0.00046663402],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96291804,0.024631456,0.0034921984,0.0021397725,0.0031974171,0.0036210946],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012229513,0.00058458943,0.00032867672,0.0020398982,0.0033245033,0.0052946648,0.0017250535,0.002955846,0.0057881903],"category_scores_gemma":[0.036573853,0.00033577,0.00049302215,0.00064317905,0.0038011668,0.003820676,0.0063452977,0.0046101017,0.0021481405],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001591334,0.004847852,0.01362712,0.0029077698,0.00005717695,0.0012722728,0.15945865,0.000637133,0.018978028,0.09795472,0.02487556,0.67522466],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005552419,0.002951532,0.029268702,0.007949394,0.00034690162,0.006611219,0.17731175,0.010059162,0.032275166,0.24268906,0.48969778,0.00028414506],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00031337974,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00067347765,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99704415,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014384154,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007114604,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06467664},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6902004540","doi":"10.6084/m9.figshare.14036018","title":"Plagiarism in higher education across nations: a case of language students","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Figshare","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Higher education; Academic dishonesty; Cultural diversity; Academic writing; Dependency (UML); Language proficiency; Cultural background","score_opus":0.0604466207801165,"score_gpt":0.4177232853902771,"score_spread":0.3572766646101606,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6902004540","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99615115,0.00015427613,0.000090731366,0.0011819182,0.000006355845,0.0000115269295,0.000007779305,0.0000029309147,0.0023931358],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99821836,0.0002423708,0.00014318382,0.00022356477,0.000012192988,0.000004893569,0.0000064968644,0.0000030051294,0.0011459705],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976533,0.0011130617,0.00014016585,0.00014081674,0.00032975423,0.0006227826],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9928606,0.0024106314,0.0015737239,0.00028198824,0.0005724949,0.0023005272],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024063417,0.00048307487,0.00045192902,0.0028136617,0.021146927,0.003798741,0.0011622626,0.0034098937,0.0033955488],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0079624625,0.0003115952,0.0004576539,0.0031513628,0.005423668,0.0017942478,0.0035785357,0.0032128368,0.00033061698],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000595211,0.0006015707,0.14504158,0.00008227921,0.000022989856,0.069025174,0.7637139,0.00014852324,0.00088389934,0.00561516,0.0013920562,0.013413414],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001297477,0.00017935646,0.062712505,0.000115145434,0.000026301048,0.04802666,0.87588865,0.0005942589,0.000538025,0.0011920088,0.010666345,0.000047731486],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07693606,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12738703,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9965901,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00710597,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0044403644,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15297651},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["research_integrity"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["research_integrity"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W6902165921","doi":"10.6084/m9.figshare.20508716.v1","title":"Additional file 1 of Lessons from the COVID-19 pandemic and recent developments on the communication of clinical trials, publishing practices, and research integrity: in conversation with Dr. David Moher","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Figshare","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ottawa Hospital; University of Ottawa; Hamilton Health Sciences; McMaster University","funders":"","keywords":"Conversation; Publishing; Pandemic; Project commissioning; Curriculum; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)","score_opus":0.7325711618810871,"score_gpt":0.5483144276815612,"score_spread":0.18425673419952582,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6902165921","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"reporting","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"reporting","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0002955683,0.00015270807,0.0011594192,0.017989406,0.00063530076,0.00090895954,0.96022445,0.00066033116,0.017973777],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.030844253,0.0019955847,0.016148495,0.035368808,0.0036067357,0.024314782,0.73651165,0.003276014,0.14793356],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9891256,0.004495225,0.0019596743,0.0008603642,0.0027453287,0.00081374764],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.5878946,0.33790532,0.017777555,0.010309628,0.040009324,0.0061035156],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02169478,0.00072504755,0.001303201,0.005279315,0.0025589252,0.0038112681,0.002808669,0.0033440543,0.90745485],"category_scores_gemma":[0.30138108,0.000807484,0.000787206,0.01064017,0.0008611316,0.0073637757,0.0024925903,0.0030129377,0.22070624],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000052894044,0.000012404333,0.00018556217,0.00046650303,0.0000035277544,0.000011365705,0.000066451954,0.000029885363,0.000004452403,0.0007257637,0.9953917,0.003049486],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014984232,0.00009487596,0.0072794072,0.0053701657,0.00004763467,0.00017349685,0.0010564529,0.00041337573,0.00011883532,0.011602956,0.97224605,0.00009839831],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012931533,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023285292,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99665594,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0055632736,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010101634,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13200432},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"domain":"reporting","study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"other","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["insufficient_payload"],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"dataset","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W6903336940","doi":"10.11575/cpai.v5i2.76959","title":"From the History of Contract Cheating to the New Challenges of Artificial Intelligence: The Changing Landscape of Academic Integrity","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Calgary","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cheating; Academic integrity; Field (mathematics); Academic dishonesty","score_opus":0.0550537679485482,"score_gpt":0.27726158498305,"score_spread":0.22220781703450176,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6903336940","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005867726,0.08240603,0.0014685364,0.7838117,0.010409094,0.000016212947,0.00009410852,0.00004637406,0.115880266],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4830073,0.20444971,0.001899008,0.18600358,0.028958939,0.00006269952,0.00015687538,0.00044427067,0.09501764],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9822703,0.0055288933,0.0004577068,0.0010254732,0.007545964,0.0031715734],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95545995,0.022392021,0.0025378203,0.0024278774,0.011451836,0.0057305587],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014078226,0.00037939395,0.00077586144,0.004210033,0.029839167,0.029900873,0.0031142875,0.012136217,0.009906479],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03690727,0.00051327184,0.00044964193,0.0066083707,0.08078363,0.020709699,0.008372088,0.022639854,0.0010812202],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001945027,0.000018037914,0.00064284273,0.00018110956,0.000008950072,0.00030139263,0.04016739,0.00013325697,0.00006535296,0.67209536,0.25024712,0.036119714],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000030308904,0.0000071203544,0.00063088234,0.0005335626,0.0000038947323,0.00012886862,0.015619707,0.000057259153,0.0000751785,0.044920787,0.9379856,0.000034191427],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3890032,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.48844972,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9878638,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0652536,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.069968335,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.77347785},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6903526614","doi":"10.11575/prism/41646","title":"Academic Integrity the Canadian Way [Keynote address]","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"Open MIND","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Academic integrity; Presentation (obstetrics); Research integrity; Scientific integrity; Closing (real estate); Personal Integrity; Academic community","score_opus":0.10060282253568144,"score_gpt":0.38449493713089483,"score_spread":0.2838921145952134,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6903526614","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0006308093,0.011220945,0.00051071343,0.3020855,0.046584368,0.00012722728,0.0017631422,0.00034854808,0.63672864],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.009508147,0.006975106,0.0005707247,0.034000106,0.0044775046,0.000057368514,0.0006585225,0.00026768868,0.9434849],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9930265,0.00044102123,0.00012029722,0.00057873735,0.0038605551,0.0019729324],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98908174,0.0004563363,0.00016820816,0.0002686129,0.0064540245,0.0035710249],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003475361,0.0010528007,0.0010095907,0.0022781682,0.038934834,0.02128678,0.0023054609,0.009150337,0.28000027],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00924347,0.00063066615,0.00083809637,0.004268202,0.0052163415,0.0052709305,0.0057127206,0.008646442,0.067889124],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003647302,0.0000023391938,0.00003093656,0.000017250839,9.4357796e-7,0.000024518014,0.0001618084,0.00000676974,0.000025246218,0.0064616944,0.98884726,0.0044175964],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000011393014,9.4481584e-7,0.00009444466,0.000029383755,9.796191e-7,0.000011375573,0.0003462573,0.00000596306,0.000015677912,0.00047535045,0.99901307,0.0000055647865],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9248046,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96666235,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9908497,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06645745,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.16914368,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9366942},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6903693631","doi":"10.13140/rg.2.2.16271.28324","title":"Soutenance de doctorat, 30/04/2018, Université Laval","year":2018,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Work (physics); Deformation (meteorology); Term (time); Context (archaeology)","score_opus":0.01937815902597165,"score_gpt":0.26899675846720555,"score_spread":0.2496185994412339,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6903693631","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09197944,0.0733489,0.003568724,0.16319223,0.07687584,0.0009769552,0.056736555,0.005394353,0.52792704],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.09457295,0.00666843,0.0017788965,0.0013534848,0.0036037036,0.00010885564,0.002862973,0.00056112907,0.8884896],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99515957,0.0008947871,0.0002187947,0.00086262665,0.0019163358,0.00094787544],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9941492,0.0013086642,0.0003107559,0.00044387905,0.0015195119,0.0022679202],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042235,0.0009684944,0.0016160305,0.001801719,0.0047675325,0.009017769,0.0018292329,0.0035183963,0.22921753],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013014756,0.0004110078,0.00090443215,0.0010996667,0.0019319748,0.0011837465,0.0033082142,0.0037627104,0.066535346],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0019381737,0.00041369945,0.0076054563,0.0010321602,0.00014141346,0.0019240016,0.0025862337,0.0010246584,0.0043356824,0.03153733,0.83000875,0.11745237],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000092935465,0.000107519634,0.015230757,0.00019883168,0.000010844124,0.0002514156,0.00046306264,0.00025145756,0.0019387008,0.00064499356,0.9807793,0.000030191444],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.045496807,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.062485192,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7707825,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008250443,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013840544,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.76680905},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6912235639","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.16755595","title":"scientific-python/pytest-doctestplus: v1.3.0","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Tellabs (Canada); University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Debugging; Python (programming language); Hash function; Correctness; Workflow; Code refactoring","score_opus":0.044006005044772,"score_gpt":0.2976260873255937,"score_spread":0.2536200822808217,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6912235639","genre_codex":"software","genre_gemma":"software","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"software","genre_consensus":"software","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00045649253,0.00015257577,0.028155673,0.0005179721,0.0005234085,0.00009700433,0.022345366,0.9397216,0.008029907],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.007829133,0.00023624545,0.026951844,0.0018407389,0.00016371784,0.00049852615,0.043389447,0.90104324,0.018047057],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99615294,0.00047594612,0.0002986742,0.00088949275,0.00151658,0.00066637207],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99164844,0.0016283515,0.00038458002,0.002674073,0.0027686465,0.0008958492],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005071284,0.0055705803,0.0027657314,0.0022700625,0.0016658336,0.0062123807,0.008560661,0.0034314787,0.36536512],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019654443,0.004410712,0.0044656745,0.0016027198,0.0020783057,0.009637684,0.007408696,0.009229955,0.43336722],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027779434,0.00006630756,0.0013624509,0.00057866174,0.00009138286,0.00010214601,0.00012453244,0.00083417934,0.0018028002,0.0023231392,0.9667663,0.025670288],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003504953,0.000068677764,0.0025017748,0.00043613027,0.00008778886,0.0003235764,0.00011285801,0.00902645,0.021955695,0.012775946,0.9519991,0.00036149815],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006529378,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0051690894,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.36536512,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022962159,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0040056393,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9052296},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6920056548","doi":"10.60692/g2bdv-7fb81","title":"Prosocial motives underlie scientific censorship by scientists: A perspective and research agenda","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Greater South Information System","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Censorship; Prosocial behavior; Perspective (graphical); Accountability; Transparency (behavior); Authoritarianism; Scientific communication","score_opus":0.14417374528198332,"score_gpt":0.3540586832980715,"score_spread":0.20988493801608818,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6920056548","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5642263,0.017377025,0.034388117,0.22479668,0.0004382802,0.00018895383,0.00012859445,0.00007050722,0.15838547],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99267113,0.0024240543,0.0019242658,0.0015125162,0.0001827789,0.00004625559,0.000019354198,0.000011715248,0.0012079081],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.990449,0.0061607817,0.00024536435,0.0009597164,0.0011037318,0.001081388],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9282109,0.047743212,0.011691383,0.0038088101,0.0060121906,0.0025334014],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015927888,0.00053558266,0.0009373651,0.003373456,0.005849761,0.011896662,0.0022476688,0.0046357405,0.0062731206],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031526055,0.00033493445,0.00084403576,0.002652874,0.028589513,0.015773082,0.004740995,0.0051925844,0.0004220705],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000054658518,0.00021047198,0.03785549,0.0002945566,0.000074858246,0.0005814378,0.042703193,0.0004685202,0.0002978219,0.8956832,0.0014914668,0.020284262],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029455865,0.000072750554,0.0392834,0.00080143264,0.00009438695,0.0007575722,0.10157702,0.0033516502,0.0004971678,0.8272354,0.02622013,0.00007962206],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038362844,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0051800245,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99536425,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0058268583,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006835444,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08423579},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6920627145","doi":"10.60692/c0c08-rrj87","title":"Prosocial motives underlie scientific censorship by scientists: A perspective and research agenda","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Greater South Information System","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Censorship; Prosocial behavior; Perspective (graphical); Accountability; Transparency (behavior); Authoritarianism; Scientific communication","score_opus":0.14417374528198332,"score_gpt":0.3540586832980715,"score_spread":0.20988493801608818,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6920627145","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5642263,0.017377025,0.034388117,0.22479668,0.0004382802,0.00018895383,0.00012859445,0.00007050722,0.15838547],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99267113,0.0024240543,0.0019242658,0.0015125162,0.0001827789,0.00004625559,0.000019354198,0.000011715248,0.0012079081],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.990449,0.0061607817,0.00024536435,0.0009597164,0.0011037318,0.001081388],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9282109,0.047743212,0.011691383,0.0038088101,0.0060121906,0.0025334014],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015927888,0.00053558266,0.0009373651,0.003373456,0.005849761,0.011896662,0.0022476688,0.0046357405,0.0062731206],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031526055,0.00033493445,0.00084403576,0.002652874,0.028589513,0.015773082,0.004740995,0.0051925844,0.0004220705],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000054658518,0.00021047198,0.03785549,0.0002945566,0.000074858246,0.0005814378,0.042703193,0.0004685202,0.0002978219,0.8956832,0.0014914668,0.020284262],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029455865,0.000072750554,0.0392834,0.00080143264,0.00009438695,0.0007575722,0.10157702,0.0033516502,0.0004971678,0.8272354,0.02622013,0.00007962206],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038362844,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0051800245,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99536425,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0058268583,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006835444,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08423579},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6920784215","doi":"10.6084/m9.figshare.14036018.v1","title":"Plagiarism in higher education across nations: a case of language students","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Figshare","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Higher education; Academic dishonesty; Cultural diversity; Academic writing; Dependency (UML); Language proficiency; Cultural background","score_opus":0.0604466207801165,"score_gpt":0.4177232853902771,"score_spread":0.3572766646101606,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6920784215","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99615115,0.00015427613,0.000090731366,0.0011819182,0.000006355845,0.0000115269295,0.000007779305,0.0000029309147,0.0023931358],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99821836,0.0002423708,0.00014318382,0.00022356477,0.000012192988,0.000004893569,0.0000064968644,0.0000030051294,0.0011459705],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976533,0.0011130617,0.00014016585,0.00014081674,0.00032975423,0.0006227826],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9928606,0.0024106314,0.0015737239,0.00028198824,0.0005724949,0.0023005272],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024063417,0.00048307487,0.00045192902,0.0028136617,0.021146927,0.003798741,0.0011622626,0.0034098937,0.0033955488],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0079624625,0.0003115952,0.0004576539,0.0031513628,0.005423668,0.0017942478,0.0035785357,0.0032128368,0.00033061698],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000595211,0.0006015707,0.14504158,0.00008227921,0.000022989856,0.069025174,0.7637139,0.00014852324,0.00088389934,0.00561516,0.0013920562,0.013413414],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001297477,0.00017935646,0.062712505,0.000115145434,0.000026301048,0.04802666,0.87588865,0.0005942589,0.000538025,0.0011920088,0.010666345,0.000047731486],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07693606,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12738703,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9965901,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00710597,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0044403644,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15297651},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6922100227","doi":"10.11575/cpai.v1i1.43395.g31012","title":"Launching an Institutional Academic Integrity Campaign","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Calgary","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Academic integrity; Research integrity; Academic dishonesty; Higher education; Launched; Work (physics); Data integrity; Personal Integrity","score_opus":0.029857906772557296,"score_gpt":0.2813723331821075,"score_spread":0.25151442640955024,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6922100227","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.27202055,0.0034717927,0.004199231,0.53006876,0.0052843234,0.00078073365,0.00014048308,0.00055551616,0.18347871],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7824901,0.0033605164,0.007138717,0.12464855,0.0020886955,0.00034614615,0.00020730666,0.00020168665,0.07951826],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9896634,0.004568937,0.00023451938,0.00036196163,0.0025349045,0.0026362154],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94311374,0.011354628,0.0033895245,0.0024946828,0.013098875,0.026548583],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020199012,0.0003554208,0.00041884521,0.0014757168,0.015638158,0.009885351,0.001594971,0.005271176,0.011406692],"category_scores_gemma":[0.033982094,0.00037274213,0.0003629499,0.0011499028,0.006399693,0.0038596694,0.009439646,0.009122146,0.00251898],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00029187542,0.0028853111,0.10168526,0.0012338946,0.00013705077,0.0018365253,0.15902123,0.00039409104,0.011035884,0.06576126,0.3504158,0.30530187],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000077890865,0.0008941981,0.061890434,0.00088580966,0.00004823172,0.00023798991,0.09165954,0.00032195396,0.004430734,0.004213177,0.83522815,0.00011191442],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.047393247,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13644835,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9947288,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00874748,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04329944,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10682386},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6924456999","doi":"10.15468/dl.qbdsrn","title":"Occurrence Download","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"dataset","venue":"Global Biodiversity Information Facility","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Download; Matching (statistics); Range (aeronautics); Data set","score_opus":0.020069416589636003,"score_gpt":0.2557928164007932,"score_spread":0.2357233998111572,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6924456999","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"dataset","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"dataset","genre_consensus":"dataset","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00004717887,0.000029621731,0.00004022416,0.000039010323,0.000012541984,0.0000054898987,0.9989512,0.00029343923,0.00058124494],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0001880951,0.00003575194,0.0001842766,0.000048476602,0.000004300939,0.0000464516,0.9988914,0.00011649044,0.00048467936],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989139,0.00016260146,0.00014250328,0.0003708812,0.00023883776,0.00017121887],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974806,0.00073967874,0.00024203467,0.00065182056,0.00060058717,0.00028532284],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010409723,0.0017929664,0.0015028464,0.0050064963,0.00097316905,0.002566149,0.0025811351,0.0020868815,0.14318994],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0063784732,0.00079549255,0.0011262868,0.009428315,0.00047164332,0.0021052454,0.0023785478,0.0020058106,0.20343512],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028394938,0.00001193853,0.00042129908,0.00052621996,0.0000147965275,0.000013881479,0.000022569566,0.00013057649,0.00010620522,0.00037021976,0.99701154,0.0013422404],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000797991,0.000008607403,0.0020094027,0.00019403419,0.000014194336,0.00003607126,0.00007696706,0.00016397214,0.00017395601,0.0007727844,0.99645364,0.000016511114],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017292332,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.030670477,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8568101,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015279884,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022287194,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47901803},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6930323460","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.12755784","title":"ҩ❥༄+91-8094774404 ҩ❥༄ Black Magic To Paralyzed My Husband","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"MAGIC (telescope); Wife; Miracle; Caster; Happening; Bedroom","score_opus":0.039910688587164116,"score_gpt":0.2994267370707377,"score_spread":0.25951604848357357,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6930323460","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0007699268,0.00024187415,0.0004722578,0.0008342959,0.0009305406,0.00008075033,0.00086789136,0.0022519245,0.9935504],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0013187696,0.00016763606,0.00019756291,0.0002371006,0.000062755105,0.000018628749,0.00027745892,0.00034129494,0.9973788],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99969864,0.000031113083,0.00001085433,0.00006719413,0.000119141085,0.000073024916],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987686,0.00011522975,0.000046753732,0.00008727379,0.0003639336,0.00061813206],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00028045714,0.0009511572,0.0006909878,0.0007641984,0.0023161883,0.0034743552,0.0008384603,0.0012079829,0.9637942],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012301966,0.0004653683,0.00045137454,0.0007077971,0.00045378765,0.0020861628,0.002424875,0.0014613556,0.936352],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005949214,0.000058745056,0.00019773569,0.000098589655,0.0000018997908,0.00007440632,0.00007851899,0.00003057435,0.00062540587,0.0007336504,0.9236672,0.07437378],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010587325,0.000041566527,0.00045292574,0.000061549035,0.000002291708,0.00013251074,0.00018278846,0.000055225737,0.0002511882,0.00014536674,0.99865675,0.0000072810667],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015806465,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0040228544,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03620583,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00056108925,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00056006206,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.051643193},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6931412433","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.830166","title":"Scientific Opinion On The Possibility Of Occurrence And Spread Of West Nile Fever Disease In Bulgaria","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Arbovirus; Culex; Vector (molecular biology); Transmission (telecommunications); West Nile virus; Host (biology); Genus; Japanese encephalitis","score_opus":0.04548994066138105,"score_gpt":0.2851417464631208,"score_spread":0.23965180580173975,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6931412433","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007072861,0.47349223,0.00085809885,0.43217358,0.06393567,0.000023247063,0.0012158621,0.000094663344,0.021133825],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.15993896,0.56365705,0.0016996796,0.18447703,0.073776916,0.00008466917,0.001446713,0.000081530365,0.014837465],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987109,0.00036663804,0.00019004884,0.00025318385,0.00033846576,0.00014079457],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9907079,0.003173642,0.001228645,0.00032716885,0.003895004,0.0006677205],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029694948,0.00041822498,0.0007985389,0.001569528,0.0006931181,0.0032259645,0.0011922386,0.004546837,0.010949926],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009531062,0.00017843848,0.00049447076,0.0014701434,0.0022983523,0.001832131,0.0011622544,0.0036149465,0.003553068],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00048562966,0.000041535506,0.013446867,0.0071295886,0.00022078778,0.0015637792,0.0009133155,0.0004018554,0.0014432254,0.011447311,0.52968615,0.43321994],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000039850227,0.000072130126,0.021244304,0.0052070967,0.00015979481,0.001547123,0.0017768175,0.00015158951,0.00028306985,0.006148551,0.96332467,0.000045068115],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004226005,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023983424,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010949926,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015057299,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025835312,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.036631227},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6931449984","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.4163356","title":"(FilmCB01) Possessor (2020) Streaming ITA Altadefinizione Guarda Gratis ejb","year":2020,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"The Internet; Subject (documents); Point (geometry); Web site; Key (lock)","score_opus":0.04133775631437262,"score_gpt":0.28014448858015517,"score_spread":0.23880673226578256,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6931449984","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0003632898,0.00019017297,0.00032058515,0.00050552306,0.000975231,0.00010537242,0.007869599,0.0024859533,0.98718435],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0016423841,0.00020092019,0.00031232522,0.00025874944,0.00020478082,0.000044338594,0.004109754,0.0017114973,0.99151516],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99976784,0.000013911375,0.0000076267165,0.000037181795,0.00011108164,0.00006237137],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991001,0.00006365242,0.000027632965,0.00011061053,0.00037788358,0.00032016964],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00033979642,0.0007157827,0.00035754402,0.0012348567,0.0015602665,0.004839782,0.0007466577,0.0012054438,0.9326545],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001526268,0.0004933514,0.000505537,0.001098639,0.00024910734,0.0034524768,0.0024689352,0.0011992222,0.8406023],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020780724,0.000008151263,0.00005461475,0.000051180945,9.2269363e-7,0.000021827811,0.00003676191,0.000007872631,0.00016757836,0.0009648018,0.9834501,0.0152153475],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000061432115,0.0000066299153,0.00036765623,0.00003334502,0.0000011960583,0.000033708555,0.000042711734,0.000015028287,0.00010991214,0.0001285693,0.9992519,0.0000032255346],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006501334,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015682826,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0673455,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008778095,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006444283,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0960601},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6939220632","doi":"10.6084/m9.figshare.12160020","title":"Additional file 2 of Stress testing journals: a quasi-experimental study of rejection rates of a previously published paper","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Figshare","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo; University of Toronto; McGill University; Ottawa Hospital; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Stress testing (software); Stress (linguistics); Stress test; Accelerated life testing; Statistical analysis","score_opus":0.09670081342737946,"score_gpt":0.3388509233346189,"score_spread":0.24215010990723945,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6939220632","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"dataset","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"dataset","genre_consensus":"dataset","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01852671,0.00009216217,0.002570243,0.0013148267,0.0003501925,0.017580792,0.9360219,0.0016164462,0.021926718],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.17411998,0.00046364882,0.025298107,0.0034247434,0.0009196993,0.27848253,0.38112488,0.0019748816,0.13419154],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99720097,0.0010165842,0.0005634375,0.00027204154,0.00069063506,0.0002562769],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.81922734,0.14227283,0.012221784,0.0074080536,0.015076303,0.0037936268],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005350113,0.0007197202,0.0012827634,0.003080078,0.0024399743,0.0014423014,0.0014181364,0.0011960708,0.8416084],"category_scores_gemma":[0.086219415,0.0005885487,0.0005759592,0.003693234,0.0005287855,0.002245548,0.0010871125,0.0010952762,0.11715624],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0036944826,0.0033389733,0.0061821076,0.004972947,0.00006297443,0.00008694177,0.0012796607,0.000377002,0.0003545785,0.0011755282,0.93081385,0.047660988],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.03682753,0.011468938,0.21686876,0.0055824737,0.00041444512,0.0005104797,0.0073816143,0.0025467672,0.0036142413,0.01673744,0.6973889,0.0006584323],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031176081,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0073696827,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9946499,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015580687,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024909072,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22592634},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6939414008","doi":"10.6084/m9.figshare.12160020.v1","title":"Additional file 2 of Stress testing journals: a quasi-experimental study of rejection rates of a previously published paper","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Figshare","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo; University of Toronto; McGill University; Ottawa Hospital; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Stress testing (software); Stress (linguistics); Stress test; Accelerated life testing; Statistical analysis","score_opus":0.09670081342737946,"score_gpt":0.3388509233346189,"score_spread":0.24215010990723945,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6939414008","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01852671,0.00009216217,0.002570243,0.0013148267,0.0003501925,0.017580792,0.9360219,0.0016164462,0.021926718],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.17411998,0.00046364882,0.025298107,0.0034247434,0.0009196993,0.27848253,0.38112488,0.0019748816,0.13419154],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"nonrandomized_trial","domain_scores_codex":[0.99720097,0.0010165842,0.0005634375,0.00027204154,0.00069063506,0.0002562769],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.81922734,0.14227283,0.012221784,0.0074080536,0.015076303,0.0037936268],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005350113,0.0007197202,0.0012827634,0.003080078,0.0024399743,0.0014423014,0.0014181364,0.0011960708,0.8416084],"category_scores_gemma":[0.086219415,0.0005885487,0.0005759592,0.003693234,0.0005287855,0.002245548,0.0010871125,0.0010952762,0.11715624],"study_design_candidate":"nonrandomized_trial","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0036944826,0.0033389733,0.0061821076,0.004972947,0.00006297443,0.00008694177,0.0012796607,0.000377002,0.0003545785,0.0011755282,0.93081385,0.047660988],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.03682753,0.011468938,0.21686876,0.0055824737,0.00041444512,0.0005104797,0.0073816143,0.0025467672,0.0036142413,0.01673744,0.6973889,0.0006584323],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031176081,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0073696827,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9946499,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015580687,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024909072,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22592634},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6958421964","doi":"10.6084/m9.figshare.7571012.v1","title":"Understanding of plagiarism among North-African university hospital doctors (UHDs): A pilot study","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Figshare","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"University hospital; Confidence interval; Descriptive statistics; Data collection; Descriptive research; Spearman's rank correlation coefficient","score_opus":0.08120629843756394,"score_gpt":0.2636649325082772,"score_spread":0.18245863407071328,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6958421964","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99916315,0.00013939332,0.00002419755,0.000087303764,0.0000029611024,0.00002155149,0.000033489094,5.6569814e-7,0.00052738225],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993155,0.00020080965,0.000056741632,0.00009872105,0.000009548451,0.00002302183,0.000024641411,5.4364426e-7,0.00027058637],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99872005,0.00059768127,0.00013379841,0.000085571875,0.00020911808,0.00025384306],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99588615,0.0015126021,0.0013688516,0.00013797804,0.00057726825,0.0005172033],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00213412,0.0001847252,0.00030913868,0.0012326216,0.0013442438,0.0009598942,0.00030215157,0.00042616844,0.0031355615],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0068980674,0.00020318427,0.00019939385,0.0009427475,0.0009143039,0.0010181575,0.0009594237,0.0004787253,0.00031914242],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026834288,0.0006274807,0.8207876,0.0003478644,0.000024337933,0.0008632966,0.15482405,0.000022573613,0.0010667832,0.00021209235,0.0006051123,0.02035048],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023652552,0.0009949439,0.8259696,0.00020112474,0.000020554435,0.0013516359,0.16708186,0.00008585988,0.00028434687,0.00006353834,0.0039056016,0.000017192851],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007642969,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011214546,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9995738,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012127495,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010003314,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.015196919},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["research_integrity"],"domain":null,"study_design":"qualitative","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"domain":"methods","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W6958494937","doi":"10.6084/m9.figshare.c.3626234_d1.v1","title":"Additional file 1: Table S1. of Variability of staffing and staff mix across acute care units in Alberta, Canada","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Figshare","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Staffing; Unit (ring theory); Acute care; Table (database); Skill mix; Case mix index","score_opus":0.01768754386446145,"score_gpt":0.25818902464198906,"score_spread":0.24050148077752762,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6958494937","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"dataset","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"dataset","genre_consensus":"dataset","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00088311086,0.000023406858,0.000094972616,0.000078504956,0.000015880085,0.00009011777,0.99748826,0.00006382439,0.0012618158],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.03965748,0.00037117556,0.0032261764,0.00032806426,0.00006318932,0.0015617352,0.93146294,0.0003156927,0.023013605],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984932,0.00011635021,0.00017338578,0.00021553486,0.000669119,0.00033244523],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9721953,0.010365063,0.0015024281,0.0009378179,0.014135997,0.0008632604],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018273975,0.0010056333,0.0011612262,0.005397093,0.0020527802,0.0017218507,0.002477933,0.0006016854,0.5270905],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026226923,0.00062598387,0.00076031627,0.012638484,0.00042989576,0.0010656518,0.0008476001,0.0009120921,0.03129957],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000113626586,0.000049451348,0.01581826,0.00086098444,0.000040041687,0.000027741755,0.00018440232,0.00056363165,0.00003115305,0.00037138807,0.97302026,0.00891913],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015546164,0.00015904945,0.4565683,0.0047486685,0.00025440537,0.00028867836,0.004504399,0.0043941545,0.0005680006,0.0021012467,0.5245996,0.00025881393],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9355937,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.94400054,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5270905,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014785574,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02922833,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.67454803},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6959264081","doi":"10.11575/prism/43097","title":"Academic Integrity Leadership and Community Building in Canadian Higher Education [Keynote address]","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"Open MIND","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Higher education; Academic integrity; Academic community; Work (physics); Christian ministry; Quality (philosophy); Learning development; Presentation (obstetrics)","score_opus":0.18617558212258117,"score_gpt":0.4194885737985511,"score_spread":0.23331299167596992,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6959264081","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00644721,0.048967518,0.0011991982,0.32459894,0.008376144,0.0001319958,0.0003863146,0.0002503746,0.6096423],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.22574298,0.049475715,0.0026499783,0.026261836,0.0018123473,0.00010862537,0.00045798763,0.00023186077,0.69325864],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963284,0.00041317617,0.000046255504,0.00015407654,0.001874517,0.0011836012],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99586016,0.0002785311,0.00014264464,0.000085038046,0.0015619792,0.0020716991],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026416152,0.00046935014,0.0003593279,0.0019486544,0.026923459,0.012636563,0.0016173489,0.0031221802,0.036778837],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0045970087,0.00036352267,0.00034756574,0.0047695106,0.01124674,0.003945257,0.005189223,0.003793792,0.0031187835],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000853052,0.000024458175,0.0006992292,0.00011154907,0.0000034406971,0.00010574282,0.008452266,0.000100137935,0.00007106033,0.07018687,0.85436994,0.0658669],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000030879396,0.000006531809,0.002936129,0.00013920957,0.0000027476206,0.00004941231,0.010821551,0.000068603964,0.00005297892,0.004204401,0.98169786,0.000017520482],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97551256,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9929798,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9973584,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11699791,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.25287107,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8488833},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6962692740","doi":"10.17026/ls/lrf63d","title":"Replication Data for Perceptions of research integrity and open science practices: a survey of Brazilian dental researchers","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"dataset","venue":"DANS Data Station Life Sciences","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ottawa Hospital","funders":"","keywords":"Perception; Research integrity; Academic integrity; Open science; Dental research; Research ethics; Replication (statistics); Computer-assisted web interviewing","score_opus":0.6140305414550996,"score_gpt":0.6205478929486535,"score_spread":0.0065173514935539245,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6962692740","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"dataset","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"dataset","genre_consensus":"dataset","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0401082,0.0002699842,0.0023490088,0.00084722374,0.000120769495,0.0019741138,0.94553643,0.00033959103,0.008454771],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.07602076,0.00031552784,0.009803141,0.00055830705,0.00006034266,0.032241113,0.87480634,0.00034313963,0.0058513843],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9813301,0.006479521,0.003191486,0.0022007343,0.0055420664,0.0012561154],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.91693395,0.031816475,0.009542517,0.016180221,0.023825316,0.001701475],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","open_science","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02418175,0.0010175825,0.0009835454,0.005353339,0.0015945975,0.0019048897,0.0018948033,0.0010877661,0.017232439],"category_scores_gemma":[0.107565895,0.00071652903,0.0011634307,0.01199433,0.00078178686,0.0011085907,0.0025307923,0.0016353163,0.009657498],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007497068,0.000510241,0.16562298,0.004466237,0.00034016278,0.0002165034,0.0051109428,0.0009857051,0.0013707841,0.003466867,0.768318,0.048841845],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008581763,0.00021769042,0.4241086,0.001378604,0.00023779049,0.00018518206,0.005859925,0.0009795369,0.0016241479,0.0018150535,0.5626135,0.000121786696],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.059459466,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.064214885,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9989122,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029555906,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0077552027,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12788689},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","open_science","research_integrity"],"domain":"methods","study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"dataset","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch","open_science","research_integrity"],"domain":"methods","study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"dataset","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W6966239810","doi":"10.3897/zookeys.75.767.maps21-24","title":"Maps 21-24 from: Brunke A, Marshall S (2011) Contributions to the faunistics and bionomics of Staphylinidae (Coleoptera) in northeastern North America: discoveries made through study of the University of Guelph Insect Collection, Ontario, Canada. ZooKeys 75: 29-68. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.75.767","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Bionomics; Distribution (mathematics); Zoogeography; Biogeography; Melanism","score_opus":0.028805673074369497,"score_gpt":0.22606997182641192,"score_spread":0.19726429875204243,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6966239810","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0033741703,0.0019978604,0.0011089861,0.0011391268,0.0011463931,0.00046629852,0.5422636,0.0012305091,0.44727302],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.02086748,0.004996617,0.0057513607,0.00029520507,0.0004205589,0.0011024135,0.48600203,0.0008468643,0.47971755],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99955183,0.00003996706,0.000031172065,0.000061053484,0.00020993872,0.00010591344],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980679,0.0002188262,0.00014268165,0.00013759536,0.0012610508,0.00017201864],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00038519508,0.0008871965,0.0005158242,0.0046343612,0.0010678942,0.001391566,0.0010433875,0.00058798835,0.3959409],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0035240967,0.00041455752,0.00046335958,0.009810813,0.00056162593,0.0012669505,0.0012485345,0.0009053503,0.16442002],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000049938517,0.000013439513,0.0010816413,0.00043938603,0.000006174996,0.00009962917,0.00029369,0.000111844645,0.00018253586,0.000676446,0.97046757,0.026577568],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018887844,0.00000785283,0.019484311,0.00024770192,0.000004675216,0.00007429322,0.00039381042,0.00008390199,0.00012885458,0.00035337076,0.97919035,0.000011977801],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.25308576,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.40650663,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.74691427,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025767828,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004668104,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.86161697},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6968847656","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.4679060","title":"办UM毕业证【Q微2026614433】办曼尼托巴大学毕业证加拿大留学买毕业证买|去哪买国外毕业证 University of Manitoba","year":2021,"lang":"zh","type":"book","venue":"Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nucleofection; Gestational period; TSG101; Diafiltration; Dysgeusia; Liquation; Emperipolesis; Triacetin; Demotion","score_opus":0.041728276187819144,"score_gpt":0.24122235222436728,"score_spread":0.19949407603654812,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6968847656","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012825181,0.0016620428,0.0012316495,0.0269281,0.001312872,0.00022584721,0.0020472584,0.00051994494,0.95324713],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.044118322,0.0018110551,0.0031664227,0.0028691888,0.00021455769,0.00019640649,0.0007325874,0.000197178,0.9466943],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984347,0.0002916675,0.00006864136,0.00026953567,0.0005400719,0.0003952174],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972383,0.00026222883,0.00009934241,0.00016088552,0.0014174024,0.0008218063],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019861232,0.0006302717,0.00047482213,0.0015841487,0.01367066,0.013123686,0.0012846708,0.002486622,0.22232716],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029315185,0.00068757357,0.00039958258,0.0039302255,0.0036887936,0.0048745084,0.0028279799,0.0027172484,0.053531278],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012712268,0.00024397769,0.008312663,0.00031756968,0.000020364123,0.00022324134,0.0062020216,0.00047715308,0.0013594085,0.15914352,0.73644865,0.08712442],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021844075,0.000026788715,0.0074751317,0.00023441385,0.000013483785,0.00003210427,0.00756839,0.00022364172,0.00064137735,0.005694329,0.9780366,0.000031884007],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5945189,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7402974,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7776728,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02251854,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.053120196,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8157381},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6981504555","doi":"","title":"End-of-Life Care: Recent Developments in the Netherlands and Canada","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library)","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Work (physics); Agency (philosophy); Field (mathematics)","score_opus":0.009162719544685675,"score_gpt":0.1986336248851204,"score_spread":0.18947090534043473,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6981504555","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14236543,0.20554738,0.0013650949,0.17763771,0.0027748893,0.00022767723,0.018524313,0.00038019716,0.4511773],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5351824,0.21066843,0.004049087,0.016886698,0.00058945303,0.0001450793,0.0092533585,0.00036001732,0.2228655],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99589133,0.00029516057,0.00024988182,0.00032263674,0.0016697111,0.0015713242],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97515565,0.0023677056,0.0013740746,0.00027831193,0.01014887,0.01067542],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034741324,0.00043566505,0.00068999844,0.005398429,0.005439476,0.01016046,0.0026339001,0.0024940441,0.029448694],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01163642,0.0003775272,0.0004876923,0.017659321,0.0024937417,0.0025844811,0.0031917621,0.0019287254,0.0014867887],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00054442696,0.00026117917,0.08238719,0.002094402,0.00007756168,0.0010671216,0.0072592716,0.0016435795,0.00032557631,0.057920728,0.29345578,0.5529631],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000074418924,0.00006389942,0.24395832,0.002194433,0.00009208092,0.00047897059,0.02069104,0.00090919697,0.0003111061,0.0025394054,0.7285618,0.00012537235],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99411726,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9977533,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.117181115,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.117181115,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.26538196,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.85021245},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6981549247","doi":"","title":"Energy efficient solar buildings","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"NPARC","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"","score_opus":0.013863699501377348,"score_gpt":0.2564523101574682,"score_spread":0.2425886106560909,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6981549247","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0028398011,0.00065374095,0.0010521458,0.010199412,0.023223689,0.0004968602,0.0017211466,0.00070290983,0.9591102],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.006617789,0.0003628875,0.00047631408,0.0005072569,0.0016900261,0.00006114489,0.0008026387,0.00026698716,0.98921496],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9950427,0.0006351353,0.00025486984,0.0003630576,0.003265738,0.00043852365],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94817203,0.0025547922,0.00088745257,0.0056654876,0.038700406,0.004019889],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004396459,0.0006700599,0.0013503162,0.0028086877,0.0043136124,0.0075618774,0.0018903526,0.0033511128,0.55830306],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03225353,0.00046958416,0.00069033646,0.0019126814,0.0013350326,0.002071355,0.0026839976,0.0020653973,0.41978818],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035868743,0.00004108213,0.00047876258,0.00022554159,0.000007534813,0.000108468565,0.00009648047,0.00006771243,0.00042982277,0.0027236803,0.93400955,0.0617754],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012637328,0.000018646026,0.0019225955,0.000112336624,0.000005416474,0.00009549882,0.00014505726,0.00025703397,0.0004921664,0.00095305813,0.99597675,0.000008812001],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024839786,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006970486,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.55830306,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016647546,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0046878993,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.63002706},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6983167600","doi":"","title":"L’évaluation de la performance de stagiaires basée sur des observations rapportées dans les programmes professionnalisants en sciences de la santé : données disponibles et perspectives de métaévaluatrices et métaévaluateurs en sciences infirmières","year":2023,"lang":"fr","type":"dissertation","venue":"Knowledge UdeS (Institutional Deposit of the University of Sherbrooke)","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; H2020 European Research Council; Université du Québec à Chicoutimi","keywords":"Occupational training; Human science; Continuing education; Christian ministry","score_opus":0.0868979346487099,"score_gpt":0.3588171562111431,"score_spread":0.2719192215624332,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6983167600","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0914293,0.71981406,0.10340046,0.022339547,0.0051029697,0.015348871,0.009969752,0.00040765983,0.032187328],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.68168116,0.1423372,0.12609692,0.009081019,0.0020992998,0.028133268,0.0057333456,0.00038013278,0.0044577504],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.5743955,0.3128638,0.050624788,0.012137207,0.047778603,0.0022002128],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.2812235,0.5799323,0.048941955,0.029069098,0.05845386,0.002379246],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.33444792,0.0025119807,0.006334937,0.012481945,0.0028273973,0.013539031,0.0049481946,0.0034491494,0.008442169],"category_scores_gemma":[0.56525034,0.001740576,0.01838708,0.014041714,0.0046219635,0.009175677,0.006564831,0.0058347774,0.0010906268],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0057506054,0.00059417647,0.07373336,0.29440728,0.15597792,0.00025596225,0.019388601,0.0049185376,0.0017079843,0.027362125,0.010403572,0.40549994],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0022991335,0.006330603,0.13534427,0.39560255,0.23415487,0.00061120023,0.013242503,0.0041351463,0.007840809,0.040414475,0.15926874,0.000755747],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014541967,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017069206,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6655521,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012831889,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.030050024,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8207442},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6983221641","doi":"","title":"List of 2017 Reviewers","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Northern italy; Technical university; Kingdom; West germany; University system","score_opus":0.4193874702001697,"score_gpt":0.6289515620918485,"score_spread":0.20956409189167885,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6983221641","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"dataset","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"dataset","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00035491586,0.04041179,0.002240422,0.045298178,0.823468,0.0024779683,0.008165253,0.0013539961,0.076229416],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.004288003,0.06185562,0.0060382425,0.036132023,0.42022347,0.0063855974,0.014952741,0.0022829818,0.44784132],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.981831,0.002479562,0.004206917,0.0020165974,0.008427051,0.0010389815],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7816595,0.009302143,0.01201065,0.004301667,0.1783309,0.014395142],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015509376,0.0027588843,0.005615428,0.01652734,0.004199545,0.021157466,0.00434049,0.006113868,0.38572374],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09048604,0.0011928736,0.0018858325,0.011933792,0.0010399583,0.0070951455,0.003557673,0.0036290248,0.3191403],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038582,0.000013499892,0.000075189295,0.0013813201,0.00001192341,0.00006305788,0.000035270565,0.000019359253,0.00008221718,0.00029666672,0.9699312,0.028051695],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000046915848,0.000020971902,0.00029118036,0.0018117315,0.000025220943,0.00013157247,0.00010804665,0.000042587286,0.00007527307,0.0004712924,0.9969496,0.000025633733],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017084392,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004214015,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98449063,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0039114263,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01590343,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.87619054},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6986284496","doi":"","title":"Perceptions of authorial identity in academic writing among undergraduate accounting students: implications for unintentional plagiarism","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research Portal (Queen's University Belfast)","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Identity (music); Perception; Academic writing; Self-disclosure; Period (music)","score_opus":0.0490742639248541,"score_gpt":0.4032221993906984,"score_spread":0.35414793546584433,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6986284496","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99850637,0.00009490921,0.00006252933,0.0002989772,0.0000086692535,0.0000049539854,0.0000040872505,0.0000020970574,0.0010173841],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994228,0.00007577227,0.000052586674,0.00004582502,0.000004851222,0.0000036359897,0.0000049782807,0.0000011851855,0.00038837135],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9921949,0.0030651402,0.00079600903,0.00029234844,0.0027623025,0.00088927505],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9548613,0.013151341,0.01784415,0.0016726281,0.00485505,0.00761562],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0070610303,0.00026162123,0.00046055586,0.0014269311,0.0030533571,0.006240416,0.0006455874,0.0008797164,0.0034005516],"category_scores_gemma":[0.036697935,0.0002720441,0.00040104074,0.0009354424,0.0031719727,0.0021078084,0.0034814982,0.0022414003,0.0006034741],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022617444,0.0006547658,0.70963603,0.00013679842,0.000026885311,0.0005797826,0.25165415,0.00008064936,0.001809191,0.0009849323,0.00045833245,0.033752304],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014203073,0.00070135796,0.51802987,0.00021382194,0.000026447675,0.0009411576,0.4742728,0.00029788955,0.0012597323,0.0011337445,0.0030438316,0.00006518042],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033673022,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0043632067,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9991203,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017222065,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028256248,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.037342787},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["research_integrity"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"domain":"methods","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W6990006116","doi":"","title":"Contract cheating and academic literacies: Exploring the landscape","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"Keele Research Repository (Keele University)","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cheating; Phenomenon; Literacy; Higher education; Social practice; Sociocultural evolution; Qualitative research; Misconduct; Dominance (genetics); Information literacy","score_opus":0.08187263687798124,"score_gpt":0.35834996539910147,"score_spread":0.2764773285211202,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6990006116","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93439275,0.0018536126,0.0028810168,0.006178668,0.000032704313,0.000061460334,0.00016190959,0.00004095879,0.05439688],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997883,0.00045945,0.0006850651,0.00013582702,0.000009125385,0.000021475611,0.000036927016,0.000018477434,0.00075057143],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99608517,0.0023634918,0.000087190594,0.00024105498,0.00052631064,0.00069682294],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99340725,0.004573917,0.0005400409,0.00027638703,0.00055988366,0.000642518],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0049333456,0.00033038697,0.0005557347,0.010266218,0.011581183,0.019995978,0.0018839065,0.0014922916,0.0041915523],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006943581,0.0004695974,0.0005205068,0.008393798,0.025163995,0.011418021,0.011837549,0.0025169956,0.00023147774],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035081102,0.000055320324,0.024657596,0.00018042636,0.000015054045,0.0011457993,0.9103931,0.00018012566,0.0004375572,0.03232287,0.0010200829,0.029556902],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000034542468,0.000030615323,0.019599909,0.00015611513,0.000008719194,0.0002996606,0.95766246,0.00042866592,0.00013220946,0.006833356,0.01482656,0.000018233832],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.042944588,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.075176224,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99850774,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012806121,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005206786,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0929153},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6990290593","doi":"","title":"A Cultural and Global Perspective on Academic Integrity Policies and Misconduct Procedures, and their Impact on International Student Success","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"Scholarship at UWindsor (University of Windsor)","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Academic integrity; Misconduct; Perspective (graphical); Academic standards; Learning development; Higher education; Discipline; Neglect","score_opus":0.03786491143050155,"score_gpt":0.37297217827440143,"score_spread":0.3351072668438999,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6990290593","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.56809616,0.19838732,0.0014846406,0.07984132,0.0013674888,0.00014280163,0.0005621148,0.000040683444,0.15007748],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9376832,0.056609124,0.00047924035,0.0023160817,0.000087138,0.000032481697,0.000097902026,0.00001472632,0.0026800074],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98412734,0.0062739807,0.0009381571,0.0007592375,0.005977233,0.0019240207],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9358249,0.024296282,0.006673505,0.0016515744,0.027131058,0.0044228],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021504324,0.00022989698,0.0004142083,0.0043240823,0.007635317,0.008764846,0.0011640687,0.00075008126,0.0012286128],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04106836,0.00014112053,0.00030974878,0.008801731,0.011139827,0.0031900394,0.0034664215,0.0018862168,0.00009615209],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010521353,0.000079712154,0.25164735,0.005245149,0.00023302017,0.0012161882,0.35083777,0.00062567834,0.0009794553,0.081971146,0.027586266,0.27947313],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000076922615,0.000088941626,0.25642774,0.008051204,0.00024369342,0.0004103467,0.50060076,0.0001666905,0.00089472363,0.0035817113,0.22943006,0.00009644104],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8115138,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9002276,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99924994,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03742705,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12808682,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37919247},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7001209076","doi":"","title":"The 2017 influx of Dickcissels in Ontario","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Digital Commons - University of South Florida (University of South Florida)","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Work (physics); Identification (biology); Natural (archaeology)","score_opus":0.025100883542010937,"score_gpt":0.21986357401596923,"score_spread":0.1947626904739583,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7001209076","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.67645884,0.001625794,0.00029438903,0.04778054,0.000681177,0.00009175436,0.0024398705,0.00015217824,0.27047545],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.78946435,0.00096290867,0.00014812931,0.0026002491,0.00010131604,0.000020697164,0.00044526486,0.00005934303,0.20619772],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99756753,0.00007356969,0.000038217968,0.00015038086,0.0010072105,0.0011631481],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99407,0.00034179495,0.00059067656,0.00017431866,0.0017673067,0.0030558244],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007196441,0.0002139628,0.0003214859,0.0015082404,0.020543858,0.004637664,0.0009858105,0.0019202743,0.031423476],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004094425,0.00032900463,0.00030709946,0.0031699182,0.005153875,0.0013884334,0.004059486,0.0018411907,0.0015284808],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007580534,0.000096836244,0.20374465,0.00048285731,0.00006653566,0.009332755,0.25301337,0.0004647561,0.0048063854,0.10734902,0.32236314,0.09752167],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021578478,0.000033277673,0.15563202,0.00012399911,0.000016518228,0.0003409771,0.1036222,0.00013948312,0.00052060996,0.0015861545,0.73791754,0.000045610203],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9835865,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9967423,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07631994,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07631994,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.10319923,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5537425},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7001624564","doi":"","title":"Léon Noël : \"de Laval à de Gaulle via Pétain\" : 1888-1987","year":2001,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Work (physics); Term (time); Field (mathematics); Context (archaeology)","score_opus":0.018603748775633547,"score_gpt":0.296578102332441,"score_spread":0.27797435355680744,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7001624564","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021641484,0.31781864,0.0018326723,0.23712844,0.027617956,0.00006363907,0.00082440063,0.0002717273,0.39280108],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.26145726,0.045742877,0.0010778101,0.019908542,0.00848819,0.000078647325,0.0002445682,0.00029798923,0.6627041],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980135,0.00071057805,0.00009497687,0.00029858833,0.0005812359,0.0003012472],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998899,0.00045376742,0.00013482927,0.00006968704,0.00032134732,0.00012135278],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015297731,0.0006127587,0.00046201676,0.0022508446,0.005765473,0.0039292495,0.00079498,0.0046919906,0.014914179],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008534181,0.00029681018,0.00024283823,0.0018325695,0.005269076,0.0039330847,0.0026363651,0.0045192153,0.0033160832],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014601884,0.000029239663,0.0013855178,0.00028455575,0.000021866521,0.0004372833,0.011610667,0.00015969513,0.00026716272,0.346686,0.5617066,0.077265464],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000038825365,0.0000055883734,0.0011987762,0.00019555434,0.0000025892834,0.00009952377,0.0005683926,0.000016807424,0.00017480699,0.004243627,0.99347985,0.000010587863],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0663899,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10126615,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0663899,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008111079,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003682665,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13200694},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7005295672","doi":"","title":"Publication among academic staff and students: an analysis from the ethical perspective","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dialnet (Universidad de la Rioja)","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); Attribution; Principal (computer security); Reflection (computer programming); Order (exchange); Academic community","score_opus":0.023261921628389567,"score_gpt":0.34100962287009406,"score_spread":0.3177477012417045,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7005295672","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9701468,0.002437365,0.0025828814,0.008161359,0.00011120717,0.00014231578,0.000063784275,0.000009043635,0.01634518],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972767,0.00083894935,0.00045993194,0.00048000013,0.00009034155,0.00006394755,0.000031107225,0.000007870324,0.0007512021],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9063632,0.06045544,0.00637631,0.0016561048,0.020388108,0.0047608363],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7899591,0.14313889,0.037430335,0.0036830516,0.019520322,0.006268303],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04107219,0.0003039455,0.00054778723,0.00614347,0.005709122,0.0071884533,0.00097281684,0.0014324712,0.0035071312],"category_scores_gemma":[0.13038681,0.00026737497,0.00072948873,0.0060374527,0.0060599684,0.0047984105,0.006462706,0.0021263266,0.000357482],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027190777,0.0003206447,0.42798245,0.00058114796,0.00012010956,0.0016872609,0.4533837,0.00015502141,0.00040007493,0.026916739,0.0032136396,0.084967345],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000032697077,0.00023138858,0.20088112,0.0009768151,0.000086889384,0.0020561982,0.7535797,0.0008244394,0.00052682764,0.0073303245,0.03340796,0.00006564806],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020749005,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002153657,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9985675,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006708269,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008130394,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2172131},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7006804744","doi":"","title":"W88-0304. Board of North American Missions. Records, 1849-1982. 3.50 linear ft.","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hope College Digital Commons (Hope College)","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"On board; Editorial board; Drawing board; Ethnic composition","score_opus":0.024166590228440244,"score_gpt":0.2845085945914708,"score_spread":0.26034200436303057,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7006804744","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0021267675,0.004026782,0.00015165731,0.003195204,0.0020298432,0.00011168504,0.18307307,0.0004840249,0.80480105],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0025717483,0.0011016091,0.00010612712,0.00032039333,0.00014674202,0.000119110795,0.02532354,0.000119043565,0.97019166],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995223,0.000029241171,0.00004330212,0.000075244534,0.00022527717,0.00010464029],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989467,0.000056032506,0.00009524099,0.0000643387,0.00073136535,0.000106276675],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004268399,0.0007896101,0.00036482458,0.0025100675,0.0032641664,0.0028665368,0.0009999655,0.0012154041,0.41414893],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016185135,0.00062643294,0.0001802195,0.0066997116,0.00031894777,0.0021961285,0.0011690703,0.0016526302,0.33869013],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020774833,0.000013878196,0.0003639165,0.000065115535,0.000001037516,0.000025435853,0.00008236565,0.000011021884,0.000055925615,0.0012036884,0.97988486,0.01827215],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000023600421,0.000002703501,0.003153687,0.0000486857,7.4942176e-7,0.000009651704,0.000104330895,0.000004794436,0.000029000197,0.00007067775,0.9965708,0.000002569634],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.22024676,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.38913277,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.41414893,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003564331,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0048498237,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.83564544},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7009626689","doi":"","title":"ESL Student Plagiarism Prevention Challengesand Institutional Interventions","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarship at UWindsor (University of Windsor)","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Thompson Rivers University","funders":"","keywords":"Nucleofection; Dysgeusia; Subpoena; Pretext; Demotion; Circumstantial evidence","score_opus":0.06423010000036705,"score_gpt":0.32968313394863,"score_spread":0.265453033948263,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7009626689","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9189063,0.004010946,0.003387757,0.029230759,0.00045372755,0.0011396967,0.00008926427,0.0003224684,0.042459197],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9843866,0.0020227437,0.003726069,0.0014241186,0.000088274166,0.0008266428,0.000069386115,0.000015298405,0.0074407537],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9916408,0.0048468513,0.0002917575,0.00039873042,0.0010302452,0.0017916266],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.986139,0.0043428466,0.0018729133,0.00085415295,0.0015637781,0.0052273367],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0077358307,0.00048529063,0.00040783567,0.0010540617,0.005365522,0.0037914666,0.0023238058,0.0018741649,0.010077387],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021544596,0.00023847395,0.00063738466,0.0006380599,0.002057964,0.002704401,0.009350402,0.002488225,0.0010491302],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00040256907,0.013884226,0.04828248,0.0029508113,0.000090955764,0.0010973249,0.07929132,0.0006866022,0.0019601635,0.010321827,0.019225396,0.8218064],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00046651778,0.0067208167,0.15743475,0.008496273,0.0002648831,0.0011797994,0.56697875,0.001924087,0.008829727,0.017220361,0.23027697,0.00020703033],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024250157,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007533763,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99812585,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0044982904,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017721493,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.040911496},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7015110686","doi":"","title":"Rezension: Stefan T. Siegel, Martin Daumiller (Hrsg.): Wissenschaft und Wahrheit. Ursachen, Folgen und Prävention wissenschaftlichen Fehlverhaltens. Verlag Barbara Budrich GmbH (Opladen, Berlin, Toronto) 2020. 114 Seiten. ISBN 978-3-8474-2429-1","year":2024,"lang":"de","type":"review","venue":"OPUS (Augsburg University)","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Term (time); Subject (documents)","score_opus":0.022106659280875397,"score_gpt":0.30411120375414036,"score_spread":0.28200454447326495,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7015110686","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00014442827,0.96646804,0.0005561463,0.0057895766,0.014636842,0.000040161245,0.0006928525,0.00014696678,0.011524945],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0022125847,0.9209672,0.00061587634,0.0022317928,0.0062859,0.00014924014,0.0015563375,0.00013700609,0.065844126],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99906474,0.00016174099,0.00014869601,0.00019894254,0.00034132865,0.000084517116],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968369,0.0013487553,0.00052863196,0.00014269334,0.0008973165,0.0002456922],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016907637,0.0031612406,0.0035913032,0.0058571976,0.00076905766,0.004443344,0.001626285,0.0022442269,0.13411514],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005976805,0.0008358633,0.0011622421,0.0067682574,0.00065388536,0.006020519,0.0029559697,0.004062898,0.1347293],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006339413,0.000021971067,0.00014939185,0.0077228746,0.0000737664,0.00008338756,0.0001639133,0.00013134089,0.00021737402,0.0013070607,0.7155887,0.27447683],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022052604,0.000016030732,0.000323954,0.005620896,0.00006512656,0.00028213309,0.00011563589,0.000053840802,0.00013891017,0.0011025902,0.9922438,0.000014981296],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003260532,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006186323,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99830925,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014516431,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022999821,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.44865984},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7015741787","doi":"","title":"Unintended Plagiarism Amongst International Students in Western Universities","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarship at UWindsor (University of Windsor)","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Nucleofection; Hyporeflexia; Pretext; TSG101; Articular cartilage damage; Diafiltration; Gestational period; Liquation","score_opus":0.021025724154268427,"score_gpt":0.2850070829873513,"score_spread":0.2639813588330828,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7015741787","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99258786,0.0014309554,0.00011388878,0.0010294142,0.000024038633,0.00002419247,0.00003702081,0.000009854791,0.0047428575],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99675816,0.0013279566,0.00009939084,0.00027557666,0.00003111935,0.000012187106,0.00002993444,0.000004411567,0.0014613362],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99654454,0.0011780483,0.00039732162,0.00022384772,0.0011142491,0.00054193864],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9803462,0.0037171468,0.0096184565,0.0010213511,0.0019489845,0.0033478788],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00450724,0.00030563262,0.0005108884,0.0027159876,0.0039027263,0.0035543782,0.0005911047,0.0009605733,0.004986541],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017813547,0.00021496603,0.00031922673,0.0026081163,0.002325739,0.0019754178,0.003049238,0.0011859422,0.0007064177],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000109572415,0.00020391673,0.82216287,0.00034885228,0.00004651727,0.0010474031,0.110145114,0.000040122468,0.0008764296,0.0010184448,0.0016403495,0.062360454],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000056035014,0.00026763816,0.83693755,0.00059313944,0.000041487314,0.0017339167,0.14844878,0.00010552008,0.000686706,0.00092730817,0.010194239,0.00005813168],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006043107,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012640943,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9990394,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014819871,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025842402,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.023836851},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["research_integrity"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"domain":"methods","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W7019944828","doi":"","title":"International undergraduate students’ perspectives on academic integrity: a phenomenological approach","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"Mspace (University of Manitoba)","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Academic integrity; Promotion (chess); Learning development; Undergraduate student; Academic dishonesty; Academic writing; Study abroad; Phenomenology (philosophy)","score_opus":0.03453105402388437,"score_gpt":0.2943250233926597,"score_spread":0.2597939693687753,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7019944828","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96789795,0.0015207788,0.0042239465,0.0048779733,0.00016932418,0.00031561026,0.00011882683,0.000033477416,0.020842133],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99002624,0.0021596313,0.0013285924,0.0011980613,0.00006629564,0.00024046772,0.00006249079,0.000023987255,0.004894205],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9943786,0.00379539,0.0001869705,0.00031458514,0.0005909693,0.00073349715],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9931149,0.0040256507,0.000670152,0.00036531946,0.0007494082,0.0010745788],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009484105,0.0008974343,0.0008174949,0.002582488,0.013129252,0.00862287,0.0017327889,0.0021344288,0.002201226],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010086716,0.0006109588,0.00051318674,0.002926376,0.016213326,0.00724861,0.008614127,0.006003724,0.00034364825],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012458618,0.000047455167,0.0014881139,0.00003947412,0.0000019423653,0.00021694165,0.9927448,0.000019339986,0.00031535668,0.0028064703,0.00034410472,0.001963626],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000022285806,0.00003862387,0.0010390677,0.00009315471,0.0000029725704,0.00017621892,0.98944956,0.000046278197,0.00013308911,0.0005728785,0.008435864,0.000010078426],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007040039,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009640301,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99786556,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0067365803,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0046543963,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05015731},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7023889461","doi":"","title":"Plagiarism detection software and academic integrity :\\nthe canadian perspective","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"E-LIS Repository (University of Naples Federico II)","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Academic integrity; Plagiarism detection; Academic dishonesty; Academic institution; Work (physics); Software; Perspective (graphical); Institution; Service (business)","score_opus":0.015816985725820444,"score_gpt":0.24325847072792173,"score_spread":0.2274414850021013,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7023889461","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04915347,0.05184072,0.0020499004,0.6271443,0.0013558636,0.00013540812,0.0010634429,0.00014780376,0.26710907],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.73985934,0.11857722,0.0050019794,0.07531787,0.00096037117,0.00009273375,0.0006795056,0.00019154247,0.0593195],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9727525,0.0051285066,0.0009386212,0.002046898,0.012120222,0.0070132045],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9066855,0.020565413,0.0058846404,0.001670345,0.047096692,0.018097447],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015234429,0.0007441286,0.0009087637,0.011646176,0.047527153,0.028779494,0.0048707393,0.007885047,0.013357692],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03719983,0.0008587287,0.0007364882,0.019569298,0.029539939,0.011757824,0.0068647005,0.008558342,0.00096420816],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018211376,0.0002045809,0.048120804,0.001919777,0.000083515384,0.0017861886,0.09421698,0.00085928844,0.0009864538,0.47617373,0.21133953,0.16412696],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003372879,0.00010856184,0.056111284,0.0026169345,0.0001221057,0.00066764065,0.14992516,0.0010696742,0.00086563407,0.025982123,0.762124,0.00037324172],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99449956,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99611604,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99211496,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.26200828,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.42173943,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8559658},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["research_integrity"],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":true,"confidence":"medium"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["research_integrity"],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"commentary","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":true,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W7026487070","doi":"","title":"Actitudes sobre el plagio electrónico en las investigaciones científicas, de los estudiantes de primer año y quinto año del turno matutino y vespertino de la carrera Comunicación para el Desarrollo, durante el primer semestre de 2022","year":2022,"lang":"es","type":"dissertation","venue":"Repositorio Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Nicaragua-Managua (Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Nicaragua Managua)","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Subject (documents); Quarter (Canadian coin)","score_opus":0.008568680400841423,"score_gpt":0.2890398427357609,"score_spread":0.2804711623349195,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7026487070","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3023088,0.020261584,0.017547203,0.26772484,0.0014951152,0.0003530461,0.00025522007,0.00017472533,0.3898795],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9062564,0.014138469,0.0049551474,0.011506959,0.00051420816,0.00035818794,0.00010591329,0.00008073173,0.06208403],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9663146,0.022616258,0.0014563728,0.0014023201,0.006834842,0.0013756887],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8977672,0.06349658,0.008147073,0.007813862,0.017528774,0.0052466267],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.031563282,0.00039670564,0.00038339812,0.003425205,0.0102437325,0.015991947,0.0012483662,0.0031189704,0.009829313],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06844617,0.00037208552,0.0003378475,0.004898944,0.015791666,0.012752054,0.009667755,0.004693177,0.0015313814],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009995151,0.0001949869,0.024140982,0.0010263292,0.00005484339,0.00039305005,0.59770024,0.00039742517,0.0021528453,0.20208792,0.017386822,0.1543646],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020977186,0.0001420137,0.029670438,0.0028795686,0.000046372454,0.00027879997,0.41549206,0.00031799078,0.0020664919,0.041869838,0.5071455,0.00006983765],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016100548,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019078214,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.996881,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011697904,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0225414,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1669246},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7027566547","doi":"","title":"Creating an Educative Approach to Academic Integrity within an Ontario College Public–Private Partnership","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarship@Western (Western University)","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Academic integrity; General partnership; Transformational leadership; Higher education; Curriculum; Workforce development; Workforce; Transformative learning","score_opus":0.21382541729705376,"score_gpt":0.3864244623085518,"score_spread":0.17259904501149806,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7027566547","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.36007375,0.0015809484,0.03164679,0.17409682,0.0013254178,0.0019328676,0.000139924,0.00033611097,0.42886737],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87937725,0.0018087442,0.021505462,0.004895605,0.00013236703,0.00043516362,0.00007515257,0.000088408175,0.091681845],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9883525,0.004634296,0.00029637408,0.00071592384,0.0038058616,0.002195148],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97708124,0.003194382,0.0017509756,0.0016395753,0.0048910766,0.011442719],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011568199,0.00025071448,0.0002648515,0.0009361633,0.029637814,0.0139311645,0.0023634085,0.0022591024,0.008723218],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01556567,0.00034221204,0.0003732896,0.0012590411,0.01528816,0.0048262784,0.016254533,0.004511656,0.0011935021],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007661997,0.00079052453,0.018801762,0.00048569986,0.000024101268,0.0013858844,0.53164196,0.0011323466,0.0028920844,0.12741111,0.07724249,0.23811539],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026968757,0.00019708076,0.009534799,0.00056625577,0.0000147770115,0.00029370352,0.2784755,0.00083617656,0.001307189,0.009436315,0.69925636,0.000054887758],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.23965304,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.54806775,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9977409,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.051563893,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1928446,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47651625},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7032887647","doi":"","title":"Orchid Island Capital Announces Third Quarter 2017 Results","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Quarter (Canadian coin); Capital (architecture); Work (physics); Investment (military)","score_opus":0.02239066523448779,"score_gpt":0.3079197961468759,"score_spread":0.28552913091238813,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7032887647","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004733529,0.0007121173,0.0004229513,0.03088544,0.0075963745,0.0002076142,0.02402131,0.0013224749,0.93009824],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.008256486,0.00031554955,0.00013965857,0.0028797882,0.0008787386,0.0000792222,0.006359879,0.0003308402,0.9807598],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99444664,0.00019815101,0.00014996702,0.00024883918,0.0039962195,0.0009601194],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98564494,0.0016306203,0.00052773434,0.0010176324,0.0078760795,0.0033030713],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004846819,0.0006601284,0.0006597696,0.0039203335,0.004887096,0.01161992,0.0015482598,0.0046247765,0.2909729],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014426337,0.00038739562,0.00091709493,0.002541487,0.0014685637,0.0031195472,0.0035676975,0.004976847,0.1422757],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004214071,0.000035295445,0.00083549053,0.000027050395,0.0000026381458,0.000031381012,0.000040307088,0.000032239117,0.000039350514,0.0037478865,0.98939556,0.0057706633],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030497516,0.00001936792,0.008570943,0.0000906178,0.000008106571,0.000023465465,0.00033701592,0.00020024818,0.00041078817,0.0015053912,0.9887834,0.00002010023],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10015475,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.19800988,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2909729,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007252196,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016037228,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9734013},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7032911575","doi":"","title":"Pirate Life: measuring success through the balanced score card","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"Revista de Estudos Anglo-Portugueses/Journal of Anglo-Portuguese Studies","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Measure (data warehouse); Report card; Work (physics); Balanced scorecard; Calibration; Order (exchange)","score_opus":0.07814752095058841,"score_gpt":0.36610991674103516,"score_spread":0.28796239579044675,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7032911575","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9299388,0.00018328533,0.004125793,0.000387743,0.000052811352,0.00077803276,0.001160335,0.00004024137,0.06333302],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9759152,0.00026486837,0.010341672,0.00006759901,0.000020625086,0.0006925955,0.0009866318,0.000026142294,0.011684602],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9949531,0.0013000446,0.00042043626,0.00017640562,0.00274874,0.00040118748],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98840976,0.0017374944,0.0025971294,0.0006513874,0.005273625,0.0013305789],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004742685,0.00029421452,0.00022962425,0.0051063113,0.0015460139,0.0026175305,0.00074428925,0.0003612307,0.0053721685],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01802091,0.00016755988,0.00026198867,0.004986562,0.0015879438,0.0016035195,0.0021419208,0.00063986646,0.0011818982],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028516227,0.00047711813,0.7751235,0.00021938956,0.00007189903,0.00020448517,0.025847098,0.0004497125,0.0014031447,0.009471715,0.00792141,0.17852537],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015892778,0.0003168479,0.93987256,0.00012428602,0.000016518909,0.00016658992,0.034173217,0.00092236843,0.0012028473,0.0012075247,0.02193347,0.00004780972],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.045044743,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08943106,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.045044743,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003023402,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003213495,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0895651},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7032923074","doi":"","title":"The Optimization of Lateral Ankle Sprain Management Practices Among Physiotherapists in the Canadian Armed Forces","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"TSpace (University of Toronto)","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Rehabilitation Institute","funders":"","keywords":"Rehabilitation; Randomized controlled trial; Balance (ability); Ankle; Ankle sprain; Medical prescription; Exercise prescription; Best practice","score_opus":0.01726237474986827,"score_gpt":0.3028462006337098,"score_spread":0.28558382588384157,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7032923074","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9848728,0.0057741324,0.00019224406,0.0022890721,0.000040395582,0.00047725585,0.00027552608,0.0000121413605,0.0060665132],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99063444,0.006142321,0.0015866164,0.00058270665,0.000014906558,0.00015835666,0.0001330717,0.0000033735487,0.0007443931],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9953483,0.0010062596,0.00038644456,0.0003082611,0.0019942303,0.0009565421],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99259984,0.0015854914,0.0014627245,0.00010899183,0.0031163555,0.0011266071],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0050667315,0.00028436852,0.00043798736,0.0016484602,0.0035763578,0.0017512093,0.0012228691,0.00061477366,0.0014431869],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017856749,0.000337334,0.00041511568,0.0029206185,0.00068053487,0.0006000295,0.0009011895,0.00053102756,0.00010907234],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005833339,0.0011945624,0.60863864,0.0072145117,0.00037962207,0.00081214984,0.072725624,0.00037673954,0.003266741,0.00055600994,0.0043282714,0.29992387],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013552843,0.000967271,0.9250836,0.0017794314,0.00026195313,0.00023634525,0.057745226,0.00034536127,0.00055272,0.00007237516,0.012732185,0.000088021654],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8953302,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96979314,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10466981,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.022949368,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07982116,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21057242},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7032939176","doi":"","title":"Observations and interspecific pairing of a Violet-green Swallow and Tree Swallow in northwestern Ontario","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Digital Commons - University of South Florida (University of South Florida)","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"NOSM University; Northern Ontario Academic Medicine Association","funders":"","keywords":"Tree (set theory); Pairing; Interspecific competition; Phylogenetic tree; Population","score_opus":0.0306283129254647,"score_gpt":0.20685339484519127,"score_spread":0.17622508191972658,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7032939176","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9965251,0.000034746743,0.000057890506,0.00002984894,0.0000030931474,0.000009189223,0.000084458065,0.0000029431258,0.0032526837],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9961015,0.00004711612,0.00014487385,0.000026119067,0.0000028571362,0.000007717962,0.00015206529,0.000002797274,0.0035149544],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99979573,0.000028876058,0.000008297188,0.000044074757,0.00005623491,0.00006677347],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99935216,0.00008949884,0.00011193823,0.000024234141,0.00016281527,0.00025931108],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00021570476,0.00013408078,0.00024824738,0.0005372717,0.0039557153,0.00051050825,0.0004425373,0.00043432694,0.0018828427],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006972775,0.00022459618,0.00014084158,0.0004995065,0.0008842908,0.00030207756,0.0008846371,0.00038361712,0.00040586406],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00033823657,0.00009299257,0.90620035,0.000036032405,0.000042206495,0.0035573628,0.057237,0.00007749433,0.024189468,0.00033196126,0.000949031,0.006947876],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002350785,0.00006163135,0.9808452,0.0000064808473,0.000009968485,0.0001753923,0.016040329,0.000059399645,0.00036923448,0.00002066978,0.0024040642,0.000005183481],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7473129,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9724913,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2526871,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0039146896,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030125969,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5083504},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7033525068","doi":"","title":"Protocol for a Composite Ethnography","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"SocArXiv (OSF Preprints)","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Ethnography; Proposition; Normative; Tacit knowledge; Space (punctuation); Participant observation","score_opus":0.06829920997651308,"score_gpt":0.39101833308062856,"score_spread":0.3227191231041155,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7033525068","genre_codex":"protocol","genre_gemma":"protocol","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"protocol","genre_consensus":"protocol","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.003971882,0.00038063308,0.06422697,0.0028243132,0.0026217774,0.88681966,0.014135802,0.00109748,0.02392152],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0026605767,0.00013876095,0.03517777,0.00060803327,0.00015435633,0.9541432,0.0013796244,0.00011944671,0.005618149],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9559081,0.027667092,0.005100792,0.0038790463,0.0053742095,0.002070663],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.86721337,0.04604156,0.003498746,0.04034747,0.03820849,0.0046903486],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.07682522,0.002157769,0.0019993922,0.0041996865,0.00679338,0.0041545094,0.0026205434,0.004334841,0.25918135],"category_scores_gemma":[0.12809083,0.0022339416,0.0017714562,0.0032713355,0.003256476,0.003168397,0.0055664107,0.008268106,0.06476426],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.008163076,0.0031074402,0.0014942073,0.010631849,0.00011411749,0.001727768,0.035210192,0.0023903965,0.0089990795,0.06597296,0.5195529,0.34263602],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004250437,0.0014045859,0.00292257,0.0038306597,0.000043868826,0.00024435026,0.007505749,0.001092621,0.0033850388,0.02567715,0.94942755,0.00021547182],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029000607,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0060588312,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.25918135,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004631072,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020290386,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.867048},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7033859725","doi":"","title":"Soil Properties and Trace Gas Fluxes in a Chronosequence of Permafrost Disturbances, Cape Bounty, Melville Island, Nunavut","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"QSpace (Queen's University Library)","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Permafrost; Chronosequence; Thermokarst; Tundra; Arctic; Soil carbon; Trace gas; Disturbance (geology); Hydrology (agriculture)","score_opus":0.011306596486219338,"score_gpt":0.21205431985374035,"score_spread":0.200747723367521,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7033859725","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99927956,0.00005752707,0.00003266413,0.000009385118,0.0000018969627,0.000008106155,0.00029195717,0.0000025861136,0.000316436],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99838066,0.00008304522,0.0002448407,0.000019592608,0.0000019956365,0.000020523988,0.0005737327,0.0000025013328,0.0006730055],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.999908,0.000008799361,0.000005264715,0.000035392433,0.00002655006,0.000015948908],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999551,0.000044814595,0.00012941528,0.000025825875,0.00014460109,0.00010426953],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020120607,0.00025149592,0.00014144668,0.00057803385,0.0009834873,0.00055652874,0.0004948164,0.00016520433,0.0005466096],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00030711293,0.00016797276,0.00013006617,0.00062359986,0.0005295537,0.0001784902,0.0002675328,0.00021236147,0.00009713393],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016571289,0.00007934169,0.9840148,0.000014975204,0.000032168045,0.00022812051,0.001059299,0.00022758226,0.011116636,0.000033309247,0.00020212456,0.002825952],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000020739656,0.000012029704,0.99914503,0.0000020513048,0.0000027848832,0.000023144337,0.00022317705,0.000112393886,0.00028646828,0.0000040769746,0.00018520071,0.0000015340271],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6857946,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9169188,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3142054,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034487578,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010511571,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.63211167},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7034538383","doi":"","title":"Toronto stocks rise; Air Canada shares soar on improving… – Marketscreener.com","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Soar; Climate change","score_opus":0.012051250427805945,"score_gpt":0.265544267738036,"score_spread":0.25349301731023005,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7034538383","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0008281529,0.0011837841,0.0005715399,0.04186729,0.0031562063,0.00011391665,0.007068761,0.0027891968,0.9424212],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0032216692,0.00062819436,0.00029217376,0.0027189148,0.0004651244,0.000013987713,0.0019540319,0.0006894676,0.9900164],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972796,0.00008315751,0.000046986726,0.0001398797,0.0020160773,0.00043435735],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9841844,0.0006409858,0.00036288713,0.0006213251,0.009204387,0.004985955],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020988728,0.00083978276,0.00049036986,0.002263273,0.00444133,0.009199273,0.0011026972,0.0036280367,0.5362326],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009411549,0.00034469657,0.00039921005,0.0022118937,0.0017519771,0.0032979867,0.0023442563,0.0027786833,0.31729475],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000072488947,0.000006336917,0.00011086198,0.000011675489,7.8812593e-7,0.000009825401,0.000020025112,0.000010522957,0.00004542847,0.0018142359,0.9861334,0.011829656],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008738664,0.0000049057394,0.00060203474,0.000028662187,0.0000014193257,0.000009885098,0.00006061111,0.000067427514,0.00015017168,0.00054649723,0.998514,0.000005650786],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3947625,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6087437,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6052375,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009595993,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.024009606,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7849294},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7034571296","doi":"","title":"Urban Choreographics: Tracing the Extralinguistic Pedagogies of Montreal’s Underground Metro System","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"Spectrum Research Repository (Concordia University)","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Gesture; Embodied cognition; Movement (music); Normative; Architecture; Ethnography; Public space; Space (punctuation); Field (mathematics); Everyday life; Tracing","score_opus":0.03959381709743956,"score_gpt":0.32848334350451225,"score_spread":0.28888952640707266,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7034571296","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9537475,0.0002628839,0.0021048582,0.0008451075,0.000026086062,0.00006320041,0.00017274251,0.00005847904,0.042719297],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9919783,0.0001284832,0.0007427327,0.00002947247,0.000005250797,0.000017661345,0.00005297901,0.00002245417,0.0070227133],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992316,0.00038803977,0.000011209237,0.00010685443,0.000099522564,0.00016291304],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989477,0.00045388995,0.00014342515,0.00009362003,0.00013206896,0.00022935805],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00092565076,0.00037774685,0.0001483805,0.0016328682,0.0052078282,0.002361674,0.000907589,0.00050967024,0.004900164],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022870381,0.0002454701,0.00015079528,0.0013495942,0.008007186,0.0013214244,0.0023224575,0.00074012607,0.0002472529],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025294708,0.000022025331,0.012444676,0.00005461917,0.0000055412374,0.00058044604,0.95570743,0.00014909134,0.002087999,0.008727808,0.0016165411,0.018578542],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000033986116,0.000037862566,0.077460766,0.0001116704,0.000008179629,0.00014108601,0.8177263,0.0003230828,0.00085556717,0.00080999837,0.102494046,0.000027994625],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.52438396,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8327043,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47561604,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011012018,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005253065,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9568341},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7034573413","doi":"","title":"Time dependent behaviour of reinforced embankments on soft foundations","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"Library and Archives Canada (Government of Canada)","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Deformation (meteorology); Foundation (evidence); Settlement (finance); Levee","score_opus":0.005713036252507581,"score_gpt":0.19128712923338256,"score_spread":0.185574092980875,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7034573413","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99763846,0.0000126097475,0.000081478145,0.000016440486,8.025343e-7,0.000003813296,0.000061295876,0.000006601672,0.0021784522],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9956182,0.000014585181,0.00009500933,0.0000034056318,5.750178e-7,0.0000037382401,0.00008330474,0.0000053465,0.0041758944],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995227,0.00010590853,0.000021219292,0.000055821107,0.00018399449,0.00011040454],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99117833,0.0030168474,0.0015287494,0.00060378184,0.0025317247,0.0011405676],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006502675,0.00012369522,0.00019200347,0.00086878607,0.0008047923,0.0008672911,0.0004076485,0.00040448245,0.009988982],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01080679,0.00014807237,0.0001306428,0.0006894088,0.00047044575,0.00048264494,0.0009196821,0.0004715028,0.0012577946],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0025549254,0.00060339324,0.88883895,0.00008639018,0.00012274236,0.0006205929,0.008408166,0.012878473,0.02529088,0.004947225,0.0026516358,0.05299663],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000770418,0.00022994938,0.98638445,0.000018136665,0.000012827749,0.000074053605,0.0039269645,0.004965436,0.0021559885,0.0006218767,0.0015813982,0.00002124816],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07084565,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13242407,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07084565,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013543378,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007826508,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14086658},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7034603491","doi":"","title":"Utilization profile of the trauma intensive care unit at the Role 3 Multinational Medical Init at Kandahar Airfield between May 1 and Oct. 15, 2009.","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarship@Western (Western University)","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cryoprecipitate; Intensive care unit; Mechanical ventilation; Anesthesiology; Intensive care; Fresh frozen plasma; Blood transfusion; Mortality rate","score_opus":0.1553391324149777,"score_gpt":0.34630327080597423,"score_spread":0.19096413839099652,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7034603491","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9969934,0.00012907897,0.000021600801,0.0001061885,0.000006699291,0.000020898671,0.0022871895,0.000004061082,0.00043085657],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970349,0.00013395729,0.00006260891,0.00013845849,0.000011801665,0.000028515005,0.00216666,0.0000020669443,0.0004211374],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99957377,0.000041169937,0.000055643828,0.00006847265,0.000096509066,0.00016440905],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99880576,0.000055185592,0.0006419409,0.000026449563,0.00016066364,0.00031008595],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003000271,0.0002716263,0.00022509867,0.0011223423,0.000719244,0.0005514223,0.00047967248,0.00036841576,0.0023144477],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008488387,0.00021293404,0.00021625789,0.0015541643,0.0002741121,0.0004459201,0.00070441945,0.0005251642,0.00041412262],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023864593,0.000034752527,0.99868053,0.00000709587,0.000008115702,0.00013872841,0.00013333495,0.00002266103,0.000118972544,0.000006479337,0.00031427073,0.0005111076],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000023119069,0.000036553563,0.9989384,0.0000069548796,0.0000032703697,0.00020177779,0.00052012404,0.00005877183,0.000025142335,0.0000026977323,0.00020156737,0.0000024420538],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05365939,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10429742,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05365939,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00179094,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014925324,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1066941},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7034747234","doi":"","title":"Venture Investment into U.S. Companies Levels Off in Second Quarter of 2011 (PRN)","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Quarter (Canadian coin); Investment (military); Venture capital; Work (physics)","score_opus":0.030180302677070756,"score_gpt":0.2831037098694775,"score_spread":0.25292340719240675,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7034747234","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2902388,0.003927119,0.000552456,0.033509187,0.00092514564,0.00011368048,0.036341544,0.0006012361,0.6337908],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.43069732,0.0030254847,0.00033188102,0.0022162928,0.00027235365,0.000062544386,0.012701725,0.00008793515,0.5506044],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99926466,0.00008095015,0.00003352356,0.000064539214,0.00037861796,0.00017786383],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99440247,0.0008707256,0.0011441256,0.000254458,0.0018966685,0.001431548],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010883185,0.00019831615,0.00014317424,0.0015065696,0.0018175158,0.0035772743,0.00032967873,0.0013311114,0.022333046],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0066478797,0.00014429454,0.00019568998,0.001959122,0.00039301618,0.0012982523,0.001250447,0.0014793652,0.005552634],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023620698,0.0001668255,0.07465916,0.00018453205,0.00002678012,0.00021780859,0.00088380725,0.00038610678,0.00044783083,0.01886943,0.71483713,0.18908441],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003451789,0.00014468573,0.4756535,0.00022990153,0.00002550265,0.00026432966,0.0026023693,0.00094383355,0.0024637883,0.0026362918,0.51496446,0.00003675125],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04547322,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13893643,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04547322,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003182113,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0042003663,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09041709},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7036206369","doi":"","title":"Bank of Montreal Can Increases Position in Covanta Holding Corp (NYSE:CVA)","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Position (finance); Government (linguistics); Subject (documents); Payment","score_opus":0.01626067028784999,"score_gpt":0.29205547380765146,"score_spread":0.27579480351980146,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7036206369","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002067185,0.00047797977,0.00014409704,0.0082262,0.00098408,0.000085957836,0.0019191807,0.00043705892,0.9856582],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0054806066,0.00013317422,0.00006144336,0.0005379676,0.00011727013,0.000017241859,0.00030704518,0.00009091443,0.99325436],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99750096,0.00012848094,0.000046755395,0.00022252933,0.0012780763,0.0008232506],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99247676,0.0006361777,0.00022726899,0.00041557665,0.0037993395,0.0024448123],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022809065,0.0007966495,0.00056309515,0.0028672921,0.010601829,0.01074636,0.0019193307,0.006039502,0.5911752],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0113256015,0.0005155767,0.000460728,0.0021253463,0.0023242768,0.0036874602,0.003244953,0.0042134584,0.166245],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034717217,0.000040242077,0.0012118724,0.0000319583,0.000004328837,0.00016648871,0.00020125836,0.000044616878,0.00012635619,0.019279502,0.96174246,0.01711629],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015357598,0.000013828411,0.0037938966,0.00005838141,0.0000040466102,0.000034478722,0.0003327045,0.00008122968,0.00020957553,0.001085902,0.99435717,0.000013315606],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.50203365,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7793478,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5911752,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016431445,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03364398,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998223},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7037194096","doi":"","title":"Die Anerkennung und Vollstreckung ausländischer Urteile nach kanadischem Recht (zu Supreme Court of Canada, 18.12.2003 - Beals v. Saldanha)","year":2007,"lang":"de","type":"article","venue":"Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Jurisprudence; Right to die; State (computer science)","score_opus":0.033015540017588614,"score_gpt":0.28400011988783813,"score_spread":0.2509845798702495,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7037194096","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.071405776,0.00452336,0.0024255265,0.14420885,0.0016823384,0.00023001825,0.001490357,0.00020219863,0.77383155],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.47116202,0.0015817025,0.0012676588,0.11626964,0.0003104193,0.00021900232,0.00028651397,0.00012866763,0.4087744],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99327505,0.00051831786,0.00018183219,0.0006055624,0.0018650147,0.0035541395],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99733245,0.0006779512,0.00015232801,0.00027541324,0.0011203185,0.00044160415],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004356376,0.00043270388,0.00053846627,0.0007527704,0.019903244,0.00892333,0.0021924814,0.01569326,0.00782136],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009331262,0.0008565684,0.00096021476,0.001366695,0.0072578085,0.002314331,0.0031198037,0.01473818,0.0015722653],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013151659,0.000061896826,0.0054376875,0.000069766174,0.000056685214,0.00091675174,0.010954381,0.000430462,0.0012775885,0.6797545,0.2844504,0.016458437],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010528631,0.00004741509,0.017985577,0.0003859817,0.000128512,0.00030040398,0.005771977,0.00073380704,0.0020847644,0.046143014,0.92610365,0.00020967396],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.93950605,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9794208,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.060493946,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.041540876,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08935221,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30140156},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7038025320","doi":"","title":"Feature Story: President and Vice-Chancellor Dr. Vianne Timmons receives honorary degree","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"oURspace (University of Regina)","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Feature (linguistics); Institution; Officer; Degree (music); Indigenous; Order (exchange); Service (business)","score_opus":0.016888417666571058,"score_gpt":0.2296196081167616,"score_spread":0.21273119045019054,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7038025320","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0015045282,0.0048224856,0.00022883345,0.77867067,0.1059432,0.000054613018,0.00033366284,0.00027616273,0.10816584],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.014704705,0.0039367275,0.00016515041,0.27802724,0.021131389,0.00006207651,0.00019805654,0.0001871551,0.68158746],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991247,0.00017209291,0.000028710423,0.00011775954,0.00033454178,0.0002222181],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977487,0.00026328844,0.000087831686,0.00007881858,0.0007297405,0.0010917062],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012493042,0.0004654575,0.0004286156,0.00038096888,0.004685199,0.0038377407,0.0009864324,0.005439897,0.08461049],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007244085,0.00023655292,0.00032304792,0.000405463,0.0010352194,0.002432405,0.0019543485,0.009253576,0.04097378],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000022818176,0.0000028120905,0.000047554196,0.0000042052666,3.3609405e-7,0.000047949754,0.00006271709,0.000001731263,0.0000069293724,0.00025831367,0.9974698,0.002095509],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000019448723,0.0000062327917,0.00029680209,0.00003564974,9.663396e-7,0.00023168998,0.0007076811,0.000011505972,0.00002847427,0.000113588256,0.9985593,0.0000061955984],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015592516,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03912901,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08461049,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00198043,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028807498,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2830503},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7038966416","doi":"","title":"La gentrification liminale et ses ambiguïtés : Ethnographie d’un café coopératif à Montréal","year":2021,"lang":"fr","type":"dissertation","venue":"EspaceINRS Institutional Digital Repository (Institut National de la Recherche Scientifique)","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Calendering; Gentrification; Locale (computer software)","score_opus":0.07763592026283393,"score_gpt":0.34809413612946893,"score_spread":0.270458215866635,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7038966416","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94714653,0.0027502559,0.0015818331,0.004322838,0.0000642428,0.00008126466,0.0007358793,0.000032584125,0.043284588],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9854931,0.00066144223,0.00029259484,0.00028036674,0.000008184181,0.000030948402,0.00011707483,0.00002456874,0.013091761],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99899477,0.00031884643,0.000017581884,0.00019230669,0.00014672763,0.00032975737],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99895966,0.00037803882,0.00011571744,0.000055902143,0.00023022579,0.00026045015],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013036813,0.00033699922,0.00029265936,0.0012751628,0.011499673,0.004342425,0.0011559366,0.00078492094,0.007995427],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020623489,0.00036271938,0.00025869758,0.002807227,0.00877852,0.00187569,0.0028275885,0.0012043759,0.00024064447],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000060316703,0.000021537226,0.021750186,0.00015783479,0.000026126587,0.0010087222,0.9342151,0.00018459586,0.0016661974,0.019676028,0.005324872,0.015908431],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009143957,0.000030910487,0.09233452,0.0002416126,0.000022788661,0.00022952209,0.72475016,0.00016213433,0.0004134141,0.00056072295,0.18118092,0.000064086205],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9543198,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98625773,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.045680225,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.038467374,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.025784887,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27910167},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7039879099","doi":"","title":"Numerical studies on winter precipitation type formation","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"eScholarship@McGill (McGill)","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Precipitation; Type (biology); Numerical models; Atmospheric models","score_opus":0.03775642449735899,"score_gpt":0.3254039613877656,"score_spread":0.2876475368904066,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7039879099","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.976253,0.00024972984,0.0037403381,0.0005004137,0.00011091655,0.000053190586,0.0034149946,0.0004182527,0.015259239],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99583083,0.00009128326,0.0013856607,0.000029483701,0.0000147328765,0.000017357801,0.0010600593,0.00005346956,0.0015171873],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998273,0.00004551064,0.000018060495,0.00003817137,0.000025226003,0.00004558],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988953,0.0005268199,0.00013064427,0.00009441443,0.00020228948,0.00015047479],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00066025235,0.00025739928,0.00042362823,0.00095335284,0.00060908316,0.0012094975,0.00068711175,0.0011781511,0.0059659337],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0034806496,0.0002670229,0.00056553463,0.0016767731,0.00046757245,0.00083043944,0.00047515947,0.0006652127,0.00067326304],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020798876,0.00021028961,0.10380977,0.000096380856,0.00009676639,0.00032967137,0.00016123263,0.87840354,0.0015902591,0.0023650657,0.0036850616,0.0090438705],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000118479125,0.000052130188,0.041914113,0.000029806775,0.000019346571,0.000038662543,0.00028427897,0.953806,0.00074026815,0.00082593755,0.0021412547,0.000029648123],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07692182,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06027209,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07692182,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012355568,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006822002,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1529482},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7043976898","doi":"","title":"University students’ reactions to a peer’s cheating behavior","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"eScholarship@McGill (McGill)","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; McGill University","keywords":"Cheating; Witness; Academic dishonesty; Grading (engineering); Dishonesty","score_opus":0.02948989476851309,"score_gpt":0.3168272164199106,"score_spread":0.28733732165139747,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7043976898","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9986665,0.000027447588,0.000056736153,0.000079246696,0.0000043102345,0.000008885282,0.0000084554795,0.000004217236,0.0011441804],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99923253,0.000045704186,0.00008795014,0.00004125141,0.000008568444,0.000011856624,0.000010399447,0.000001839909,0.0005598254],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9959881,0.0023570019,0.0002702954,0.00025063765,0.00081291015,0.00032092922],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97714764,0.007285638,0.009067395,0.0018238995,0.0028041836,0.0018713038],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035163604,0.00033859105,0.00039002154,0.0006828291,0.0019260067,0.0021131036,0.00041704616,0.0010303854,0.00302555],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02515376,0.00018722654,0.0002723763,0.00040598013,0.001173403,0.0005970277,0.0015240744,0.0015592476,0.00069210224],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006958162,0.0010530315,0.7615329,0.00016775425,0.00012421187,0.0011165611,0.16318326,0.00026633596,0.014574152,0.0008318083,0.0013483451,0.055105783],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023373637,0.0021306877,0.82942027,0.00008503987,0.00006827284,0.0009018893,0.1507685,0.0010361054,0.009479323,0.00045442343,0.005513649,0.00011844918],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013991839,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017366483,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9989696,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007566794,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00043816044,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01859653},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7045825188","doi":"","title":"Community-based conservation and protected areas in Namibia","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"UNAM Scholarly Repository (University of Namibia)","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Degree (music); Work (physics); Biodiversity conservation; Natural resource","score_opus":0.019438364509005754,"score_gpt":0.24646158600658463,"score_spread":0.22702322149757886,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7045825188","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8920889,0.014016777,0.00025860948,0.009638382,0.000112926835,0.00011684044,0.0005216304,0.00000773816,0.0832381],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9866605,0.004200965,0.000427882,0.00030585387,0.000019372284,0.000036999474,0.00008927974,0.0000029651862,0.00825618],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99966395,0.00012140819,0.000010406379,0.000021846525,0.000049497798,0.0001329813],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99973375,0.00007763414,0.00006320586,0.000008755232,0.000040394272,0.000076345816],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000583383,0.00013980287,0.00020567808,0.0007429789,0.0021818278,0.0016647785,0.00045864395,0.0005044037,0.006536357],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010757267,0.000119478886,0.00007025139,0.0020308034,0.0010962021,0.00065548636,0.0012603573,0.0003663586,0.00021245038],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00040764597,0.000559458,0.220302,0.0024636737,0.0001201426,0.004883725,0.22847074,0.0013361437,0.0093122795,0.0687148,0.012318023,0.4511114],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000032865733,0.000111573376,0.67032295,0.0023584508,0.000029196895,0.00082930893,0.19930641,0.0004621594,0.0007888182,0.00490512,0.12082983,0.000023307095],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.16002369,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4031762,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16002369,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0065338803,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006487867,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3181845},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7067346643","doi":"","title":"Les règles sur l'intégrité académique des étudiants dans les universités au Québec 2010-2020","year":2021,"lang":"fr","type":"other","venue":"Archipelago (University of Quebec in Montreal)","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Legislation; Work (physics)","score_opus":0.024968103187578784,"score_gpt":0.23247856525331126,"score_spread":0.20751046206573248,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7067346643","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.44186097,0.02244904,0.0024360549,0.19463956,0.0011369184,0.00028515968,0.030809768,0.0007062779,0.30567622],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8754054,0.0065511134,0.0012049335,0.005010316,0.0002529566,0.0001325161,0.0050999667,0.000122693,0.10622016],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99391246,0.00067028805,0.0002752494,0.00040524514,0.0023735543,0.002363195],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9417575,0.0044551,0.004609559,0.0010962648,0.031568352,0.016513199],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005959795,0.0003607465,0.0005165489,0.004200255,0.00720199,0.0063555255,0.0014347088,0.0014891608,0.027490737],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023257703,0.00025820083,0.00045052235,0.007917851,0.0023789834,0.003039359,0.0032290295,0.0025785975,0.0028216683],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00040643435,0.00012391055,0.42130518,0.0012670001,0.00016138681,0.00036699412,0.027969982,0.0012617337,0.0017709946,0.04368158,0.27827305,0.2234118],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018660796,0.00004550214,0.75955516,0.0005756227,0.000037998525,0.00006270529,0.017402176,0.0004695829,0.00056474004,0.00087691954,0.22031312,0.000077725446],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9819264,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99026805,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99851084,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.078657694,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.16051482,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5707042},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7068972959","doi":"","title":"Cincinnati, Ohio","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"OhioLink ETD Center (Ohio Library and Information Network)","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Period (music); Stage (stratigraphy); Quarter (Canadian coin)","score_opus":0.009375778577711286,"score_gpt":0.22661670380215,"score_spread":0.2172409252244387,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7068972959","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00062259095,0.0024979431,0.00091971527,0.0025505847,0.0028266534,0.00018581373,0.008126984,0.0010574546,0.9812122],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0018365056,0.0021314144,0.0006227661,0.00055439264,0.0002310658,0.00012565525,0.002739915,0.00042995697,0.9913284],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99847883,0.00016058165,0.00013454257,0.00048290318,0.0005903456,0.00015276788],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99648833,0.0004898109,0.0002186825,0.00051647524,0.0014799967,0.00080672797],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012920862,0.0018849614,0.00088797836,0.0020357633,0.0035216175,0.00675634,0.0016925209,0.001845157,0.8671011],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0044622137,0.00068398815,0.00079070416,0.0035554222,0.0009471001,0.0036406675,0.002338243,0.001976249,0.68309516],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000094905765,0.000092133225,0.00069128996,0.00023013601,0.000013999027,0.00021092786,0.00013441867,0.00010508156,0.0002949461,0.003635335,0.8756181,0.11887862],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000147023065,0.000015781745,0.00084193144,0.00009890369,0.0000044774465,0.00005696024,0.00011684518,0.00003475769,0.00006722863,0.00029716035,0.99844307,0.000008145956],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012592476,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03662451,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13289893,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019350252,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032517712,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18956411},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7088049368","doi":"10.6084/m9.figshare.30334888","title":"Additional file 2 of “What are you afraid of?” A mixed methods exploration of serious illness communication with oncology patients on general internal medicine wards in Canada","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Figshare","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; University Health Network","funders":"","keywords":"MEDLINE; Internal communications; Palliative care; Continuity of care","score_opus":0.03639533431914105,"score_gpt":0.3403221728012852,"score_spread":0.30392683848214413,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7088049368","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0016475138,0.000055208515,0.00026683998,0.00064615475,0.000093676965,0.0010767265,0.9901398,0.00011616015,0.0059579643],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.07076587,0.0008334579,0.011941501,0.0044351285,0.00027507494,0.05538446,0.7553548,0.0010799262,0.0999297],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99737984,0.00059313973,0.0003408734,0.00032897602,0.00077663787,0.00058052025],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9134545,0.05619728,0.0034103668,0.0035461613,0.020561643,0.0028300206],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036713942,0.00087674655,0.001478825,0.005950632,0.005284311,0.0043500396,0.0027841746,0.0018275314,0.8120896],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07487646,0.0009529228,0.0017610731,0.009930852,0.0011016205,0.0020848745,0.002335909,0.0015999936,0.08149802],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013919882,0.00013392406,0.0055165105,0.001969145,0.00003946785,0.000053258456,0.0010131417,0.00018803199,0.000012582326,0.00085606705,0.982614,0.0074646887],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0057022255,0.00020489801,0.18407544,0.013430399,0.0003518934,0.00033986912,0.026453817,0.0017582466,0.00026667066,0.009500446,0.7575787,0.00033736607],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7120624,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.82289743,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8120896,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0146521265,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04461102,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.57926655},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7093090974","doi":"10.26803/ijlter.24.10.8","title":"Academic Integrity in Teacher Education in the GenAI Era: Academic Coordinators’ Perspectives in Spain","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Learning Teaching and Educational Research","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Agencia Estatal de Investigación; European Regional Development Fund; Mendelova Univerzita v Brně; Asociación Universitaria Iberoamericana de Postgrado; McGill University","keywords":"Academic dishonesty; Cheating; Misconduct; Academic integrity; Sample (material); Perspective (graphical); Perception; Face (sociological concept)","score_opus":0.07448466220962638,"score_gpt":0.4802951541068865,"score_spread":0.40581049189726015,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7093090974","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9923431,0.00088205235,0.00013070676,0.0038135198,0.00003661902,0.000008258715,0.00001483886,0.0000044151957,0.002766496],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982304,0.00044305556,0.00004563567,0.00034951995,0.000017443086,0.000004564688,0.000007771196,0.0000030773995,0.0008983849],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9912834,0.0053104954,0.00033170357,0.0003732381,0.001143683,0.0015575106],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97155863,0.010756973,0.0068189595,0.00055484765,0.0030609455,0.0072496505],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010304039,0.00018793374,0.00053252943,0.0014540808,0.0055129984,0.0064744856,0.0008018509,0.0016450407,0.0022974592],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018309535,0.00029387337,0.00020391363,0.0015719846,0.00485751,0.001995438,0.0047568697,0.0021977506,0.00022376151],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011584857,0.00013523303,0.1622154,0.00018474399,0.000013426031,0.0016399889,0.81546986,0.00010769621,0.0006269461,0.0020593777,0.0020827353,0.015348684],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008692062,0.00007061272,0.0642963,0.00015534036,0.000005509095,0.00043297754,0.91942,0.000067977104,0.00015288084,0.0002511303,0.015119502,0.00001916121],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0151959555,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021868417,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.998355,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006981086,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0074985167,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.054493606},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7095441586","doi":"","title":"Dendrochronological Analysis of Endangered Newfoundland Pine Marten Habitat: Decay Classification of Coarse Woody Debris in Western Newfoundland By","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Endangered species; Marten; Habitat; Taiga; Population; Debris; Biodiversity; Vegetation (pathology); Snag","score_opus":0.027618910000651243,"score_gpt":0.30876948252952885,"score_spread":0.2811505725288776,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7095441586","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99939084,0.00002173695,0.000050887906,0.0000061684304,3.5655307e-7,0.000001592737,0.00021139956,0.0000023153882,0.00031468476],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989749,0.000019109308,0.00009684778,0.0000023394832,5.517925e-7,0.0000019380595,0.00053743785,0.000001059339,0.000365831],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99992704,0.00000857476,0.0000060345355,0.000013463771,0.000013294736,0.000031504627],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994461,0.00006760699,0.00014589247,0.000030807085,0.00020254507,0.00010695598],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020907696,0.000078452926,0.00007652273,0.0014388771,0.00046174074,0.0003016456,0.00013294822,0.000082288716,0.00066693366],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005554161,0.000049642575,0.00006639892,0.00078947167,0.00024437465,0.00012697619,0.00020010617,0.000107323765,0.000114753115],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000051263592,0.000007258024,0.9935747,0.000005050024,0.000007788275,0.000048640995,0.0004333849,0.00018693128,0.0015788197,0.0000387405,0.00015109224,0.003916316],"study_design_scores_gemma":[1.8789267e-7,0.0000032206847,0.9995542,9.0912914e-7,0.0000011625954,0.000013919469,0.00016010008,0.00010236189,0.000061172694,0.0000022570925,0.00009982927,5.545134e-7],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.40611303,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7064287,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.593887,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012211301,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000618635,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8074984},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7096238052","doi":"","title":"Canadian Medical Education Journal Review Paper Ethics education for pediatric residents: a review of","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"License; Attribution; Medical ethics; Continuing medical education; Information ethics; Nursing ethics","score_opus":0.06120973752125139,"score_gpt":0.42649935565078706,"score_spread":0.36528961812953564,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7096238052","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000595398,0.97904783,0.00012871265,0.015511451,0.0011852963,0.00016140303,0.00024682458,0.0000064512647,0.00311672],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.021444846,0.96320045,0.0012130206,0.011840737,0.0010600272,0.00027174284,0.00023062801,0.00001566045,0.0007228351],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","domain_scores_codex":[0.9519881,0.018384427,0.010693597,0.0016513185,0.015938807,0.001343687],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6332661,0.21666162,0.03849706,0.0061444454,0.09978922,0.0056415824],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05406262,0.0008115213,0.0023574885,0.02048866,0.0025191586,0.006199514,0.0028545898,0.0029370862,0.00800702],"category_scores_gemma":[0.239493,0.0009981219,0.0016097447,0.021894945,0.0036816928,0.0027310278,0.002676565,0.0025171645,0.0006536324],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020171654,0.000096699594,0.0076584327,0.25861755,0.0022392694,0.00030922468,0.002759219,0.00014713545,0.00020772908,0.0068946215,0.23071954,0.49014887],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012411973,0.000070455324,0.015435846,0.49618062,0.0024504843,0.00072675495,0.00217549,0.00004702633,0.0001821702,0.0011414884,0.4813924,0.00007308929],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.20144856,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5234312,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9459374,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.033072297,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13938928,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40055197},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7096330857","doi":"","title":"Recommended Citation Iantosca, Jo Ann, &amp;quot;UNITING EARLY CHILDHOOD SCREENING AND MONITORING TO INFORM INTERVENTION PRACTICES &amp;quot; (2012). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. Paper 246. UNITING EARLY CHILDHOOD SCREENING AND MONITORING TO INFORM INTERVENTION PRA","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Windsor; Intervention (counseling); Early childhood; Permission; Citation","score_opus":0.05552895080823362,"score_gpt":0.3589670274836576,"score_spread":0.303438076675424,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7096330857","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0012371653,0.09150162,0.0019056266,0.2018661,0.17222966,0.0006760809,0.020765914,0.00042022497,0.5093977],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.014454181,0.16009673,0.003931012,0.019356998,0.02954498,0.00064612157,0.010079378,0.00055319624,0.7613374],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984285,0.00034083327,0.00017367606,0.00018687532,0.000765227,0.00010483965],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98718786,0.0038114723,0.0006118086,0.0006255668,0.006212645,0.0015506644],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032649375,0.0005293369,0.0010783985,0.0051735956,0.0022055705,0.005733918,0.0015668006,0.0018007536,0.2414285],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029464664,0.0003829335,0.00028021444,0.011973412,0.00090127974,0.004520196,0.001968137,0.0020689652,0.08869641],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000047545827,0.0000065574773,0.00016103203,0.00021614804,0.0000014590089,0.000009392132,0.00018162752,0.000011184301,0.000009371991,0.0009674919,0.9650473,0.03338369],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006570475,0.0000064833075,0.0023075857,0.0009862761,0.000004813163,0.000037706403,0.0006067359,0.000026275231,0.000030225798,0.0007442356,0.99523526,0.000007805861],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.026176123,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.051433623,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2414285,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032558243,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0080872895,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8076588},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7096412347","doi":"","title":"133Censure et traduction / Censorship and Translation When Literary Censorship Is Not Strictly Enforced, Self-Censorship Rushes In","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Censorship; Promotion (chess); Translation studies; Work (physics)","score_opus":0.05001557075578799,"score_gpt":0.301567325306081,"score_spread":0.251551754550293,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7096412347","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05485699,0.008459976,0.0069280863,0.06596013,0.0015853252,0.000038578677,0.00015150734,0.00021076859,0.8618086],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.84356195,0.00188819,0.0013085379,0.004050956,0.0010388567,0.00003655098,0.00007650787,0.00030369425,0.1477347],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99174446,0.0046141227,0.00039071066,0.00094622653,0.0014139533,0.00089047325],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98567146,0.005631799,0.0015088897,0.0044639064,0.00199807,0.00072591973],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0068196,0.00044617502,0.0006706,0.0017636276,0.00997915,0.013314432,0.001293716,0.0035229162,0.015545575],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021168327,0.0002947463,0.00035809595,0.0019568475,0.04474885,0.008552762,0.0061202976,0.0046892897,0.0036971644],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004103337,0.000011918672,0.00082462933,0.00006592126,0.000006699478,0.0002906278,0.050268047,0.0000551577,0.00022632888,0.9118007,0.019050129,0.017358832],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003204787,0.000035032703,0.0041037295,0.00051390973,0.000021950667,0.0007543502,0.026743706,0.00037152524,0.0014808909,0.24936861,0.71651596,0.00005831413],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022876274,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.032045715,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022876274,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008554071,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007218411,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06206441},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7096468816","doi":"","title":"UEA – CRU Review Initial Report and commentary on email examination","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Interpretation (philosophy); Mainstream; Cru; Opt-in email; Electronic mail; Quarter (Canadian coin)","score_opus":0.03690118014937428,"score_gpt":0.3467046481530606,"score_spread":0.30980346800368636,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7096468816","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00057460205,0.12308429,0.00046513017,0.67363304,0.19117345,0.0004380162,0.00053881924,0.00015593399,0.009936721],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.01547634,0.09772757,0.0011583074,0.7329853,0.13512774,0.0024021755,0.0006639362,0.00049929006,0.013959322],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.8905081,0.036731932,0.023243446,0.006673856,0.037478086,0.0053646173],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.43437994,0.25336334,0.039333813,0.017794162,0.24572663,0.009402117],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0846658,0.0013777633,0.003184378,0.017821133,0.0072093406,0.013294376,0.008223211,0.025534615,0.009662593],"category_scores_gemma":[0.4200841,0.0018495533,0.0027143362,0.014029572,0.010940722,0.008954287,0.008559795,0.02152113,0.0074203117],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000394434,0.0000056538247,0.00011311165,0.004899279,0.00003529697,0.00039860286,0.0017412292,0.000020198948,0.000101159,0.0016295568,0.98293847,0.0080780545],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012230249,0.000012438105,0.00047505158,0.019282252,0.000049060505,0.00026897958,0.0012136861,0.000019529927,0.000109915636,0.00044244764,0.9780829,0.000031595173],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.030966047,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.029440762,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97446537,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.025968745,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.055479497,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.44776088},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7097990543","doi":"","title":"Dedication","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Work (physics); Government (linguistics); Agency (philosophy); Scientific literature","score_opus":0.022070473306015373,"score_gpt":0.3165259369604927,"score_spread":0.29445546365447733,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7097990543","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0010147041,0.0028546653,0.0063086483,0.059362225,0.016402032,0.0007456404,0.009664118,0.0053949277,0.89825314],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.006222628,0.002673602,0.0031643696,0.016730346,0.0044946717,0.0006975506,0.007364589,0.0014284445,0.95722383],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9953265,0.0010644374,0.000256985,0.0006428023,0.002140926,0.00056830014],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9664795,0.004384798,0.001716677,0.0059387,0.013098001,0.0083823],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005074639,0.0009537484,0.0011391926,0.0022048275,0.0024535498,0.011287595,0.003060769,0.003954594,0.8097426],"category_scores_gemma":[0.052182622,0.0005343558,0.00071402115,0.0017110411,0.0017708906,0.0040280833,0.007609098,0.004104961,0.8368141],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002885537,0.0000269266,0.00020276466,0.00017664547,0.0000035415733,0.00006048763,0.000158899,0.00003455779,0.00025690199,0.0045040576,0.92885846,0.065687954],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005165912,0.000009689745,0.00021466141,0.0002036873,0.0000015883573,0.00014594672,0.0001278725,0.000031549887,0.000044992856,0.0014610045,0.9977488,0.000004974628],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014628724,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001452829,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19025737,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015382423,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005869625,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7099256230","doi":"","title":"BY","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Acknowledgement; Center (category theory); Diffuser (optics); Doctoral studies","score_opus":0.011126823888387384,"score_gpt":0.2865073367809479,"score_spread":0.27538051289256055,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7099256230","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0005115926,0.0014405274,0.0011993593,0.004781856,0.00370455,0.00013575074,0.002255788,0.0013167103,0.9846539],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.003266261,0.001064351,0.0007245068,0.0020143914,0.0005261693,0.000086747226,0.0015836346,0.00044698745,0.99028695],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978102,0.00025647946,0.00013970303,0.0006275839,0.0008205816,0.0003455382],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99733573,0.00027460008,0.00012394629,0.00063053024,0.0011692722,0.00046575838],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013852484,0.001166644,0.0008775184,0.002153451,0.0032246783,0.013502677,0.002289967,0.0051598023,0.8532006],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0062379413,0.00060348446,0.0011615293,0.002040505,0.0014087793,0.006684912,0.006314266,0.003502247,0.78066206],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006571734,0.00006109055,0.00057824753,0.00032184937,0.000012619282,0.00017221927,0.00029619617,0.00008330164,0.00058677414,0.03319316,0.8261801,0.13844877],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000057153907,0.000007893884,0.00019215958,0.00009310228,0.0000022449365,0.00007400263,0.00008495138,0.000033776316,0.00009588659,0.0012099212,0.99819523,0.0000050094627],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0058597415,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006283345,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14679939,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030901073,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0045962348,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7100222897","doi":"","title":"Faculty and Student Perceptions of Academic Integrity at U.S. and Canadian Dental Schools","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cheating; Academic integrity; Academic dishonesty; Perception; Dental education; Higher education","score_opus":0.03312903520270887,"score_gpt":0.36823263698834857,"score_spread":0.3351036017856397,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7100222897","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9941381,0.00016988185,0.000028380036,0.0009430292,0.00001276471,0.000018055212,0.00007936995,0.000005818706,0.004604591],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99898297,0.00012387497,0.000030399802,0.000103261926,0.000004694637,0.0000049499354,0.000031252795,0.000001512556,0.00071702397],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9917109,0.001354945,0.00040828463,0.00030608545,0.004275998,0.0019437568],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96779233,0.0036387304,0.00634532,0.00043782414,0.011269805,0.01051599],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0051545617,0.0002294004,0.0003877562,0.0023018322,0.008734148,0.0045994706,0.0010803116,0.0009085784,0.006295943],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021455484,0.00028142595,0.00041253632,0.0030240342,0.0038908713,0.0010146487,0.0024872145,0.0013459445,0.00041421066],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018670181,0.00034392273,0.81824374,0.00014778826,0.00004143929,0.0002649527,0.14605646,0.00013594341,0.0007594436,0.0010256621,0.0044801044,0.028313767],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012749251,0.0001936539,0.7814588,0.00011120843,0.000022140566,0.00012706628,0.2094085,0.00016298448,0.00048077438,0.00014375335,0.007833569,0.000044800905],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7794102,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8424068,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99909145,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.024841323,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04297714,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4437778},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7100235923","doi":"","title":"Emeritus Professor, Canada’s Open University,","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Viewpoints; Order (exchange); Statement (logic); Problem statement; Narrative","score_opus":0.02450809005359003,"score_gpt":0.28077027992349135,"score_spread":0.25626218986990135,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7100235923","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0155233815,0.04676043,0.003218047,0.57708716,0.05943641,0.0001931366,0.0016733839,0.0014381611,0.29466987],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.057158887,0.011625153,0.00082329597,0.021493884,0.0025327832,0.000050944232,0.000230497,0.00022511845,0.9058594],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981187,0.00015687909,0.000058638878,0.0004916155,0.0007450918,0.00042903313],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99081284,0.00068086456,0.00019230827,0.000103999795,0.0026534176,0.0055565247],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014937965,0.0005191863,0.00072079647,0.0018564501,0.0089349905,0.004895224,0.0012652376,0.003189089,0.15311],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005997799,0.00034479023,0.00028883823,0.0013605361,0.0031117378,0.0017534421,0.0016477776,0.004021286,0.03369693],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000059177928,0.000036640482,0.0019967027,0.00021542511,0.000005991968,0.0006894931,0.0017172239,0.00013757941,0.00036429046,0.009905525,0.91173434,0.07313758],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005955028,0.00001660321,0.0029353064,0.00017192206,0.00000398284,0.0005418517,0.0019838125,0.00014366339,0.00031516928,0.0010676438,0.9927861,0.000027946573],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.41590336,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.61737025,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84689,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.028885942,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.043477327,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8269651},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7100744060","doi":"","title":"Smith ( Funding Source: NSERC)","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Misconduct; Action (physics); Minor (academic); False accusation; Legal action; Remedial education; Administration (probate law); Subpoena","score_opus":0.03258413485512121,"score_gpt":0.3235343405485241,"score_spread":0.2909502056934029,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7100744060","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00439197,0.010524376,0.0038541085,0.175021,0.03149185,0.002293487,0.1455899,0.006299708,0.62053365],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.024055896,0.009320127,0.013717062,0.015211521,0.0017124388,0.0009857736,0.046209466,0.0018009624,0.8869867],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98878956,0.0009364148,0.0006474107,0.0016300788,0.006641939,0.0013546989],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.946004,0.003979362,0.0019877239,0.00323985,0.033034626,0.011754466],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.009839301,0.001384016,0.0018685004,0.0041120397,0.0027839337,0.005583514,0.0032926274,0.0045572342,0.49833012],"category_scores_gemma":[0.046719458,0.0009339921,0.0009955348,0.0039216965,0.0014616728,0.002825868,0.0038702365,0.0030850645,0.2643136],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015785801,0.000030960862,0.0004467023,0.00024865335,0.000009415015,0.00011803438,0.000058899703,0.000104325336,0.00014846142,0.0028567484,0.9648923,0.03092754],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000091908056,0.00007745385,0.001526741,0.00083941856,0.000015443287,0.00021773118,0.00017461106,0.00029188133,0.0004059763,0.0017817965,0.9945492,0.000027765409],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07404855,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13741161,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5016699,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0075581097,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06782501,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.71557117},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7100914039","doi":"","title":"Welcome Message The organising committee of the 4th Asia Pacific Conference on Educational Integrity warmly welcomes you to the University of Wollongong, New South Wales,","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Temptation; League; Asia pacific; Academic integrity; Psychological intervention; China","score_opus":0.03172056947430045,"score_gpt":0.27118561200126196,"score_spread":0.2394650425269615,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7100914039","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.001203164,0.0036465323,0.0011970461,0.6066234,0.3562607,0.0002977878,0.00038666613,0.000518209,0.02986657],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.01636128,0.003435536,0.0023860768,0.27660772,0.12633336,0.0006098252,0.0006810275,0.0010264954,0.57255864],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9954881,0.00125536,0.00017720835,0.00033919082,0.0020226147,0.0007174919],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9732764,0.0038683582,0.00107329,0.00074706954,0.010084751,0.01095012],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0052074753,0.0010929127,0.0011269609,0.0006187662,0.004879787,0.008465036,0.0017281545,0.010181266,0.10849807],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024718102,0.0004739146,0.0009717298,0.0003773135,0.001677601,0.0042377566,0.0046808207,0.017548038,0.055219833],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003974045,0.000018276867,0.000090768,0.000057140573,0.0000034757618,0.00008793846,0.0002494101,0.000008222606,0.00020493331,0.00051434187,0.9940019,0.004723796],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007952186,0.000024839883,0.00037072913,0.00007652055,0.0000037485668,0.000093087896,0.0009249901,0.000027085318,0.00014597735,0.00031797265,0.99799156,0.000015591913],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026625977,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0063023246,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8915019,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022875834,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0046366295,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3629622},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7100997620","doi":"","title":"Canada and Latin America","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Latin Americans; Exploratory research; Code of conduct; Ethical code; Code (set theory)","score_opus":0.0098397330029636,"score_gpt":0.24552216692350043,"score_spread":0.23568243392053684,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7100997620","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14320189,0.01859391,0.00092540676,0.025288096,0.00048591517,0.00011624622,0.0035019373,0.00012433788,0.80776227],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.81916815,0.02105203,0.0019056739,0.0110879205,0.0001543233,0.00013261104,0.0021329166,0.000109688,0.14425673],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987078,0.00010262029,0.0000333453,0.00013708218,0.0002889608,0.0007302705],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99769163,0.00018680008,0.00022495806,0.00007001878,0.0012267035,0.00060003606],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006421045,0.00035292108,0.00032071993,0.0025976347,0.00843583,0.0043034684,0.0005048946,0.00062180246,0.021136377],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002737511,0.00011995275,0.00031420964,0.006553794,0.0016888437,0.0010002804,0.0021376468,0.0012707944,0.0008413162],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00030621968,0.000118670236,0.21745484,0.0011034647,0.00017858672,0.0028064074,0.035915893,0.000589015,0.0018280199,0.28429088,0.13726588,0.31814206],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029562963,0.000018959778,0.16079295,0.0010691844,0.000085586595,0.000685687,0.044580694,0.00015034429,0.00049573655,0.004932852,0.78710175,0.000056609708],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9779087,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9859644,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028438115,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.028438115,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06553828,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20633394},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7103654273","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.17499558","title":"A survey on automates grading of hand written examination answer scripts using machine learning and natural language processing","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Artificial Intelligence in Medicine (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Scripting language; Grading (engineering); Natural language; Leverage (statistics); Argumentation theory; Process (computing); Word processing; Question answering","score_opus":0.034185315912616115,"score_gpt":0.30699882258322625,"score_spread":0.2728135066706101,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7103654273","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5612022,0.08144976,0.27358946,0.0047938596,0.0008461552,0.0039294185,0.007404722,0.014213944,0.0525705],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.67085624,0.04857069,0.23060973,0.0027175413,0.0005202594,0.0021065583,0.01963256,0.0017009833,0.023285344],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97449887,0.010968915,0.003152843,0.00221836,0.008500917,0.0006601625],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8790488,0.061980274,0.008382271,0.0070370687,0.041519005,0.0020324853],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019777665,0.00085615966,0.0010072456,0.004549587,0.0004528923,0.0020569547,0.0017887384,0.0011363291,0.0040484024],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06542313,0.00042043612,0.0006728144,0.0038904648,0.00049324497,0.0020378926,0.000989691,0.0005737982,0.0046232427],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004611241,0.00043429004,0.03133521,0.003135128,0.00009531228,0.00004630598,0.00074484886,0.00087501976,0.004833371,0.0004428609,0.011701294,0.9458952],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003093292,0.0049107894,0.49527434,0.009335568,0.0004993075,0.0020228648,0.0051719793,0.02842843,0.05564757,0.0029443896,0.39511496,0.000340479],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027912424,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0034859378,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019777665,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008300649,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024776042,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10459554},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7103654481","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.17499557","title":"A survey on automates grading of hand written examination answer scripts using machine learning and natural language processing","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Artificial Intelligence in Medicine (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Scripting language; Grading (engineering); Natural language; Leverage (statistics); Argumentation theory; Process (computing); Word processing; Question answering","score_opus":0.034185315912616115,"score_gpt":0.30699882258322625,"score_spread":0.2728135066706101,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7103654481","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5612022,0.08144976,0.27358946,0.0047938596,0.0008461552,0.0039294185,0.007404722,0.014213944,0.0525705],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.67085624,0.04857069,0.23060973,0.0027175413,0.0005202594,0.0021065583,0.01963256,0.0017009833,0.023285344],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97449887,0.010968915,0.003152843,0.00221836,0.008500917,0.0006601625],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8790488,0.061980274,0.008382271,0.0070370687,0.041519005,0.0020324853],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019777665,0.00085615966,0.0010072456,0.004549587,0.0004528923,0.0020569547,0.0017887384,0.0011363291,0.0040484024],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06542313,0.00042043612,0.0006728144,0.0038904648,0.00049324497,0.0020378926,0.000989691,0.0005737982,0.0046232427],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004611241,0.00043429004,0.03133521,0.003135128,0.00009531228,0.00004630598,0.00074484886,0.00087501976,0.004833371,0.0004428609,0.011701294,0.9458952],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003093292,0.0049107894,0.49527434,0.009335568,0.0004993075,0.0020228648,0.0051719793,0.02842843,0.05564757,0.0029443896,0.39511496,0.000340479],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027912424,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0034859378,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019777665,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008300649,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024776042,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10459554},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7104393696","doi":"10.55016/ojs/cpai.v6i1.76962","title":"A Roadmap Towards Integrity: A President's Perspective Twenty Years On","year":2023,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Perspectives on Academic Integrity","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Yorkville University","funders":"","keywords":"Misconduct; Perspective (graphical); Academic integrity; Discipline; Academic dishonesty; Research integrity; Key (lock)","score_opus":0.044841350002159476,"score_gpt":0.3443126902807544,"score_spread":0.2994713402785949,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7104393696","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00043674707,0.014490372,0.000099128534,0.96420616,0.016303044,0.000009106063,0.000017702008,0.000015365698,0.0044223303],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.05906027,0.060663484,0.0013722637,0.8273774,0.024642207,0.00005844851,0.000060943352,0.0001169438,0.026648022],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.94649625,0.010778962,0.0020324418,0.0028350886,0.021678552,0.016178623],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.91114813,0.012909678,0.0022532006,0.001542981,0.031205881,0.040940233],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.036271192,0.0014609658,0.0024681848,0.0024982532,0.051175736,0.035772946,0.004976656,0.046144046,0.008912373],"category_scores_gemma":[0.052400447,0.0011835396,0.0015886107,0.0037660701,0.041527078,0.020421002,0.014238092,0.068273306,0.0025925832],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037473408,0.000046165584,0.00034488607,0.00021288136,0.000020174422,0.00044759747,0.0077484157,0.00010245633,0.00017953201,0.10495771,0.87072736,0.015175357],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001188817,0.000025894682,0.0004188563,0.0003618266,0.000011886628,0.00013315029,0.008535195,0.000047631198,0.00007483841,0.0077822604,0.98252964,0.00006685946],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.63194627,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.70993274,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95385593,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08398363,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.29478863,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7404425},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7104402143","doi":"10.55016/ojs/cpai.v5i2.75990","title":"Academic Integrity and Artificial Intelligence in Higher Education Contexts: A Rapid Scoping Review Protocol","year":2023,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Perspectives on Academic Integrity","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Academic integrity; Protocol (science); Higher education; Systematic review; Personal Integrity; Applications of artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.09882107022340314,"score_gpt":0.4162777834540096,"score_spread":0.3174567132306065,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7104402143","genre_codex":"protocol","genre_gemma":"protocol","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"protocol","genre_consensus":"protocol","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0004340336,0.0005771955,0.006232733,0.0017940891,0.000747178,0.98191154,0.006115805,0.0003541969,0.0018332652],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00020972473,0.00026710783,0.0074890926,0.00021416816,0.0000410682,0.9909636,0.00037936968,0.000019120154,0.00041671412],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","domain_scores_codex":[0.8789085,0.06604518,0.03222541,0.0061887987,0.0125670135,0.004065041],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.71555483,0.1378431,0.023500558,0.0347418,0.08104954,0.0073101274],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.22826575,0.003958807,0.008016793,0.016452435,0.007195416,0.00991711,0.00495704,0.011474708,0.13449706],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2949627,0.007294635,0.009973052,0.016080022,0.006557297,0.011695093,0.009473638,0.012963149,0.044474557],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.013295348,0.0011581542,0.0012971758,0.33635885,0.0009831392,0.0022789908,0.020592202,0.002796475,0.0067585343,0.037183985,0.3772221,0.20007512],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.024214739,0.0014783167,0.004333285,0.18481697,0.0011253022,0.00066326035,0.0078068078,0.001891686,0.003358329,0.043937344,0.72538745,0.0009865959],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005059427,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012043613,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9885253,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011210153,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0924501,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9516857},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7104409111","doi":"10.55016/ojs/cpai.v7i2.77686","title":"Addressing Equity in Academic Integrity","year":2024,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Perspectives on Academic Integrity","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Fleming College","funders":"","keywords":"Academic integrity; Equity (law); Higher education; Academic community; Ideology; Attribution","score_opus":0.14120571251216474,"score_gpt":0.4302054293881819,"score_spread":0.28899971687601717,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7104409111","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009322055,0.7128041,0.004598378,0.14062786,0.0024909512,0.000101450925,0.00012576116,0.00005765013,0.12987182],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.32098287,0.6399987,0.0045987247,0.021417622,0.0021975252,0.000102330596,0.00015414046,0.000045147597,0.010503],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9812509,0.0072425655,0.0012365744,0.0007719886,0.0076361494,0.0018618406],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95477974,0.02544083,0.0033941437,0.0016488218,0.012654264,0.002082198],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018730942,0.0004335141,0.00087166665,0.006522679,0.006170582,0.012510041,0.0023221038,0.0035121825,0.0074369386],"category_scores_gemma":[0.047543373,0.00027379135,0.0007711969,0.008356126,0.013101151,0.010102468,0.0075047472,0.003250042,0.00065669575],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002699112,0.00005319169,0.0043591214,0.013165476,0.00011949985,0.00036068287,0.019006358,0.00052814506,0.00032824374,0.35150394,0.044539973,0.5660084],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012482939,0.00004486367,0.007198184,0.024194239,0.00013365402,0.00043137913,0.018964149,0.00017236901,0.0005282133,0.06618521,0.88209105,0.000044300203],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.15704927,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.20729798,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9964878,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.023038477,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08723947,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31227028},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7106034893","doi":"10.3138/jsp-2024-0049","title":"An Empirical Study of International Retracted Research Articles of Famous Chinese Universities from 2012 to 2022","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Misconduct; Citation; Academic dishonesty; Ranking (information retrieval); Publishing; Empirical research; Scientific misconduct; Quality (philosophy); Academic integrity","score_opus":0.07012572944052395,"score_gpt":0.422144762125753,"score_spread":0.35201903268522905,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7106034893","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.992673,0.0022991975,0.00016794376,0.0011805984,0.00007923551,0.000103209226,0.0006965192,0.000014047281,0.0027862214],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9955486,0.0017485011,0.00021364092,0.00021511556,0.00012585247,0.000096645286,0.00065723556,0.000007664878,0.0013867035],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9869877,0.0022741114,0.0031510957,0.001039351,0.0052488353,0.0012988587],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8401528,0.04331396,0.065990955,0.004977749,0.035003778,0.010560804],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017472543,0.00044462952,0.0006398564,0.013343166,0.0029426015,0.0040592756,0.0016632378,0.0011860179,0.0030179566],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0823568,0.00029943275,0.0006103666,0.01376259,0.0013711152,0.0037997982,0.0021924367,0.0011992897,0.0007438666],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016012473,0.00020364829,0.9020308,0.0009515524,0.00012736207,0.0024662158,0.0455939,0.00017072765,0.0005784147,0.0008094851,0.0042787404,0.042628933],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009458852,0.00014419983,0.95616364,0.0002162657,0.00007724875,0.00069321186,0.033556115,0.00039854852,0.000427239,0.00014874701,0.008116364,0.00004904917],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013627308,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013474988,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.998814,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004081482,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006393977,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09240478},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity","bibliometrics"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","research_integrity"],"domain":"methods","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"agree"},{"id":"W7106039481","doi":"10.3138/jsp-2024-0093","title":"Confidentiality, Peer Review, and the Submission Case Database","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Confidentiality; Accountability; Harm; Constructive; Focus (optics); Work (physics)","score_opus":0.040421936073048594,"score_gpt":0.35548525284433696,"score_spread":0.31506331677128835,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7106039481","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14277942,0.005512065,0.077453755,0.24245438,0.005172168,0.0017646404,0.00047436397,0.00048873393,0.52390045],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8836396,0.0024830978,0.040719658,0.012063283,0.0015141247,0.0013017297,0.00018433477,0.0001727149,0.057921402],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.81181586,0.11965122,0.011878849,0.009080441,0.03652469,0.01104883],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.80266947,0.12378387,0.014404669,0.03031414,0.017254679,0.0115730865],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.108057715,0.0004759058,0.00088560523,0.0028687895,0.021640588,0.028960252,0.006708733,0.013953317,0.011360456],"category_scores_gemma":[0.24607597,0.0010655092,0.0012800127,0.004342376,0.018031549,0.022611674,0.017007919,0.007840766,0.0025272293],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011981219,0.0001404082,0.0120226545,0.00025007493,0.000030340188,0.010106789,0.014805523,0.0007627305,0.00025428546,0.90681607,0.023430565,0.03126071],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017787232,0.00024352942,0.004142433,0.0010317966,0.00006826614,0.037300523,0.034564108,0.0043585333,0.0027733655,0.37401938,0.5410231,0.0002970442],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011169549,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008065832,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9860467,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009586231,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.021265289,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5714706},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity","scholarly_communication"],"domain":"evaluation","study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W7106146707","doi":"10.12688/f1000research.148694.4","title":"Knowledge of misconduct amid North-African post-graduate dental students: A cross sectional study","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"F1000Research","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Misconduct; Cross-sectional study; Population; Open peer review; Alternative medicine; Survey research","score_opus":0.10620055696830508,"score_gpt":0.4769614738762238,"score_spread":0.3707609169079187,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7106146707","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99950373,0.000100094105,0.000015530557,0.000041192223,0.0000021776661,0.000023481793,0.00007587726,5.0227e-7,0.00023750673],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993591,0.00020171324,0.00005238526,0.000069903544,0.0000058109003,0.000033399458,0.00008324203,4.7841826e-7,0.00019402512],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99927074,0.00018414135,0.000094550225,0.00010068409,0.0001968083,0.00015301724],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983828,0.0004052688,0.0006478895,0.00006571475,0.00021648416,0.0002818105],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012127813,0.00022604933,0.0003434475,0.0011620069,0.0008542866,0.0006588971,0.00037263753,0.00074148044,0.0023187338],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023611442,0.00041358155,0.00033983885,0.0011202369,0.00043945466,0.00081510376,0.0006750173,0.00063203933,0.00039159018],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004566217,0.00034797913,0.9935715,0.000065896085,0.000018834695,0.00016505797,0.0035223097,0.0000078629255,0.00015941006,0.000022717526,0.00012824923,0.0019446022],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008338239,0.0005860852,0.9869038,0.000062205014,0.0000241984,0.00061964034,0.011073148,0.00006560867,0.00008359175,0.000018974715,0.0005472434,0.0000071398936],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005087796,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0067199236,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9992585,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004667159,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005164652,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.010116339},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7106667985","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.17715812","title":"ICO Case Allocation Letter Regarding FOIA Complaint Against King's College London (Redacted Version, 29 October 2025)","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Complaint; Notice; Documentation; Timeline; Lawsuit","score_opus":0.029930352083695332,"score_gpt":0.2783888499486472,"score_spread":0.2484584978649519,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7106667985","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0025246944,0.0021667345,0.0013788873,0.060303435,0.025894633,0.0021270055,0.006714708,0.0023094309,0.8965805],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0072391154,0.000684421,0.0005676482,0.01558828,0.0018842106,0.00061259134,0.0018505176,0.00073176896,0.97084147],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9821368,0.0020015752,0.0018632427,0.0011986082,0.010216268,0.0025835573],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97450453,0.0070807002,0.0016252523,0.002829583,0.011873796,0.002086115],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0073248725,0.0011152528,0.0013799367,0.002971859,0.006631745,0.016145691,0.0024797784,0.020675715,0.4651307],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06873537,0.0011647585,0.001040596,0.0025523105,0.0026539757,0.004479262,0.0058819973,0.007328732,0.39614186],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003807206,0.0000085583615,0.00006919674,0.000049710477,0.0000018381542,0.0002288377,0.00015154964,0.0000123521395,0.00015529215,0.0028056519,0.99221826,0.004260779],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022031752,0.000018066312,0.0005297471,0.00017651854,0.0000031331372,0.00019366517,0.00034087963,0.000043892243,0.0002405591,0.0006246177,0.9977781,0.00002876054],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.025886243,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.033842817,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9793243,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009875677,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013329305,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.76292616},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7106704664","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.17715811","title":"ICO Case Allocation Letter Regarding FOIA Complaint Against King's College London (Redacted Version, 29 October 2025)","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Complaint; Notice; Documentation; Timeline; Lawsuit","score_opus":0.029930352083695332,"score_gpt":0.2783888499486472,"score_spread":0.2484584978649519,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7106704664","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0025246944,0.0021667345,0.0013788873,0.060303435,0.025894633,0.0021270055,0.006714708,0.0023094309,0.8965805],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0072391154,0.000684421,0.0005676482,0.01558828,0.0018842106,0.00061259134,0.0018505176,0.00073176896,0.97084147],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9821368,0.0020015752,0.0018632427,0.0011986082,0.010216268,0.0025835573],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97450453,0.0070807002,0.0016252523,0.002829583,0.011873796,0.002086115],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0073248725,0.0011152528,0.0013799367,0.002971859,0.006631745,0.016145691,0.0024797784,0.020675715,0.4651307],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06873537,0.0011647585,0.001040596,0.0025523105,0.0026539757,0.004479262,0.0058819973,0.007328732,0.39614186],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003807206,0.0000085583615,0.00006919674,0.000049710477,0.0000018381542,0.0002288377,0.00015154964,0.0000123521395,0.00015529215,0.0028056519,0.99221826,0.004260779],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022031752,0.000018066312,0.0005297471,0.00017651854,0.0000031331372,0.00019366517,0.00034087963,0.000043892243,0.0002405591,0.0006246177,0.9977781,0.00002876054],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.025886243,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.033842817,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9793243,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009875677,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013329305,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.76292616},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7107940931","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.17749021","title":"From Potsdam to London and Back: What Happens When Plagiarism Investigations Derail","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Misconduct; Accountability; CLARITY; Documentation; Adjudication; Assertion; Judgement; Rigour; Parallels","score_opus":0.05069976231035969,"score_gpt":0.2920849830481411,"score_spread":0.24138522073778143,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7107940931","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.80293745,0.0068672714,0.0011574946,0.061676774,0.0006375082,0.000092750204,0.0005761812,0.00024107458,0.12581351],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9811628,0.0018166482,0.0003047117,0.0036502988,0.0001399775,0.000040531086,0.00022720396,0.00013210668,0.012525636],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98200846,0.0080179805,0.0014149856,0.0018550928,0.0044318107,0.0022717097],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9315396,0.037277605,0.017264431,0.004935437,0.0059445645,0.0030384024],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0104748225,0.0002454776,0.00055132795,0.0051484597,0.014090371,0.020686483,0.0023828389,0.0064220815,0.014312927],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09511852,0.00081632566,0.0003435293,0.008944052,0.009908055,0.013117444,0.009802997,0.0042597717,0.0031758058],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00044467158,0.00005230879,0.051598083,0.00051363895,0.000051121573,0.00897218,0.81379473,0.00017200616,0.0012321487,0.028517207,0.040289983,0.054361895],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030441839,0.00007855528,0.050141014,0.0010836371,0.00004299457,0.0015403284,0.7119576,0.0001777479,0.001353767,0.0049945996,0.22848906,0.00011028558],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.055953734,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.083307795,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9935779,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016037663,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0071810996,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.116361976},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7107962172","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.17749020","title":"From Potsdam to London and Back: What Happens When Plagiarism Investigations Derail","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Misconduct; Accountability; CLARITY; Documentation; Adjudication; Assertion; Judgement; Rigour; Parallels","score_opus":0.05069976231035969,"score_gpt":0.2920849830481411,"score_spread":0.24138522073778143,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7107962172","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.80293745,0.0068672714,0.0011574946,0.061676774,0.0006375082,0.000092750204,0.0005761812,0.00024107458,0.12581351],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9811628,0.0018166482,0.0003047117,0.0036502988,0.0001399775,0.000040531086,0.00022720396,0.00013210668,0.012525636],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98200846,0.0080179805,0.0014149856,0.0018550928,0.0044318107,0.0022717097],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9315396,0.037277605,0.017264431,0.004935437,0.0059445645,0.0030384024],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0104748225,0.0002454776,0.00055132795,0.0051484597,0.014090371,0.020686483,0.0023828389,0.0064220815,0.014312927],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09511852,0.00081632566,0.0003435293,0.008944052,0.009908055,0.013117444,0.009802997,0.0042597717,0.0031758058],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00044467158,0.00005230879,0.051598083,0.00051363895,0.000051121573,0.00897218,0.81379473,0.00017200616,0.0012321487,0.028517207,0.040289983,0.054361895],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030441839,0.00007855528,0.050141014,0.0010836371,0.00004299457,0.0015403284,0.7119576,0.0001777479,0.001353767,0.0049945996,0.22848906,0.00011028558],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.055953734,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.083307795,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9935779,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016037663,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0071810996,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.116361976},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":["research_integrity"],"domain":null,"study_design":"qualitative","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["research_integrity"],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"other","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"medium"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W7109569626","doi":"10.4000/15aku","title":"Perceptions d’enseignants et d’étudiants relatives au plagiat : causes, attentes, connaissances et pratiques au niveau universitaire","year":2025,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue internationale de pédagogie de l’enseignement supérieur","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec en Outaouais","funders":"","keywords":"Research methodology; Cultural environment","score_opus":0.0447476929489635,"score_gpt":0.33471422763776765,"score_spread":0.2899665346888042,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7109569626","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9853044,0.0026428187,0.00062134245,0.0051843957,0.00008509713,0.000097989076,0.000100472804,0.000024348737,0.0059392387],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99446845,0.0015853237,0.00031267467,0.0006545632,0.000034881232,0.00006332628,0.000058236295,0.000008760793,0.0028137958],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9920333,0.004233557,0.0005506638,0.00055515574,0.0015291818,0.0010981732],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97016484,0.011376173,0.0070076147,0.0010054044,0.00538156,0.0050643366],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010025409,0.0003117212,0.0006898169,0.0019174818,0.004291157,0.0033228116,0.00079392915,0.0012926303,0.0072180424],"category_scores_gemma":[0.042391393,0.00044887495,0.0006315681,0.0021597904,0.0033873,0.0033731097,0.003582867,0.0024437075,0.0007969615],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020904673,0.00021154023,0.38096917,0.0006009678,0.000071955685,0.0014169171,0.57120836,0.0001081759,0.0009608092,0.0017135154,0.0036597617,0.038869787],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023678482,0.00034100882,0.38038152,0.00059631077,0.000048313956,0.0010788391,0.59155667,0.00014202415,0.00041449312,0.0007447753,0.024576947,0.000095368596],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.039420683,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.035702642,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99870735,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004388268,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005582167,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07838249},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7109574539","doi":"10.4000/15aky","title":"Conception et validation méthodologique d’une tâche d’écriture visant l’observation de pratiques plagiaires","year":2025,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue internationale de pédagogie de l’enseignement supérieur","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Rimouski; Université du Québec en Outaouais","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Data collection; Field (mathematics); Validation test; Research methodology","score_opus":0.06524404711602634,"score_gpt":0.36369466899389874,"score_spread":0.2984506218778724,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7109574539","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10609188,0.0028037839,0.79976463,0.01158094,0.0009441912,0.029037567,0.0012550285,0.0005055925,0.048016384],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.38668498,0.0014016622,0.5481909,0.0024021282,0.00016014502,0.053066544,0.00079273793,0.00033401066,0.0069669425],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","domain_scores_codex":[0.61345017,0.29943603,0.023398293,0.015785584,0.04452333,0.0034066343],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.5083998,0.32770395,0.021251582,0.052798472,0.08759434,0.0022518483],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.27738866,0.0016106218,0.0018221048,0.0106409285,0.0066297096,0.013807865,0.003884657,0.0035554187,0.0045379773],"category_scores_gemma":[0.33793712,0.0013687876,0.0022363437,0.0064822505,0.02252487,0.009899835,0.010227849,0.0052479943,0.0013511743],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00039029238,0.00033820796,0.021785174,0.00674752,0.0003069539,0.000369434,0.5159895,0.0010489861,0.00851491,0.22465436,0.004728266,0.21512634],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00046635015,0.0009395383,0.03900512,0.016500233,0.00047704065,0.0012236733,0.34310722,0.007916144,0.023587408,0.20506261,0.36118,0.0005345838],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010511291,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009810358,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9964446,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013597216,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.033331048,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.89110845},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7111422913","doi":"10.55667/10.55667/ijede.2025.v40.i2.1385","title":"Navigating Online Learning and Artificial Intelligence: Identifying and Managing Assessment Risks in Private Higher Education in South Africa","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International journal of e-learning & distance education","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Higher education; Sociotechnical system; Risk management; Misconduct; Credibility; Distance education; Institution; Academic integrity; Risk assessment","score_opus":0.04118332562804445,"score_gpt":0.4330304245834535,"score_spread":0.39184709895540903,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7111422913","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99339527,0.00022468698,0.0016762975,0.001733177,0.0000075304547,0.0000652292,0.000013691375,0.000010386339,0.0028737083],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975756,0.0002005476,0.0009941587,0.000089750414,0.0000036992064,0.00002934931,0.000006646181,0.0000033009223,0.0010969569],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9938008,0.0032161854,0.00044484992,0.00043176798,0.0012075835,0.00089886587],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9743931,0.013398773,0.0066831973,0.0010557631,0.0016429528,0.0028262313],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006388481,0.00028589275,0.00028030877,0.0017802556,0.005569531,0.0056395284,0.0009709047,0.0013269476,0.0029577115],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018969746,0.00042565263,0.00019214906,0.0012063432,0.0039878837,0.005655852,0.0072142063,0.0014312494,0.00027021495],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00033931318,0.00071958965,0.24083313,0.0008572985,0.000049178496,0.004347423,0.51304615,0.0019795087,0.005882192,0.015051505,0.0016840134,0.2152107],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000039486175,0.0007234722,0.18919833,0.0011044714,0.000047618065,0.0021429602,0.744829,0.0047404156,0.0039332593,0.015427959,0.03770459,0.00010855317],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007160165,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009261597,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9986731,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0047647553,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008856254,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.034570873},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7116976698","doi":"10.1145/3727967.3756832","title":"Replication: A Pedagogical Tool for Teaching Ethical Practices to Future Software Engineers","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Documentation; Copying; Permission; Reuse; Software; Accreditation; Attribution; Software walkthrough; Dimension (graph theory)","score_opus":0.06359842472461391,"score_gpt":0.43406284683446866,"score_spread":0.37046442210985475,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7116976698","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.055649787,0.000581432,0.86046755,0.018014422,0.0018506919,0.00835221,0.00055433356,0.0095015755,0.045028],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.19718277,0.0006091796,0.76838183,0.0034442027,0.000588216,0.015054789,0.00037136124,0.0017986728,0.012568976],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.8992827,0.08629733,0.0038357072,0.0042090723,0.0052237627,0.0011514218],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.53612703,0.3450764,0.01509768,0.08106565,0.01623786,0.006395324],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.09630232,0.0018303851,0.0011572746,0.0034263101,0.004635417,0.0065750703,0.0051272693,0.0041346964,0.028269935],"category_scores_gemma":[0.28703016,0.0014212643,0.0016638966,0.0020917123,0.007870423,0.012193581,0.011992098,0.0058794883,0.00713102],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008101059,0.0023156959,0.0081940945,0.003739237,0.00015852039,0.0020271074,0.30459967,0.0019415517,0.015189802,0.06716778,0.08410256,0.5097538],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013780264,0.0032326928,0.0070732785,0.0046645124,0.00027732673,0.0037666198,0.092233986,0.01564622,0.019451767,0.28796563,0.5637181,0.0005918975],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00035345377,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011036274,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9958653,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023155382,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006853011,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5093014},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7117303515","doi":"10.1007/s42979-025-04569-y","title":"A Systematic Review of Academic Integrity and Misconduct with Artificial Intelligence in Higher Education","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SN Computer Science","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Misconduct; Higher education; Scopus; Academic integrity; Corporate governance; Dimension (graph theory)","score_opus":0.05534632387666962,"score_gpt":0.3658793978106475,"score_spread":0.3105330739339779,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7117303515","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0021877151,0.9945745,0.00023579173,0.001260048,0.00027614448,0.0006242151,0.0005223362,0.000009032392,0.00031024552],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.10234792,0.88661,0.0026764786,0.0045307297,0.0004098176,0.0026336145,0.0005208758,0.000022087086,0.00024851933],"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","domain_scores_codex":[0.84285927,0.0717082,0.06341994,0.005626485,0.014643364,0.0017427154],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.5975527,0.28501242,0.079231545,0.007285741,0.027846605,0.0030710145],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.078051455,0.0016161652,0.013533194,0.026702158,0.002093426,0.006467263,0.0040054773,0.005354563,0.0043433076],"category_scores_gemma":[0.3549173,0.0021289932,0.012342475,0.021611754,0.0045699948,0.007225841,0.005977346,0.0038145501,0.0003397441],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":"systematic_review","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00035593897,0.000020535143,0.003072787,0.9387623,0.031157294,0.00011301689,0.0010545972,0.00006617261,0.000073951865,0.0003589115,0.0019337658,0.02303069],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004907336,0.00020881172,0.005506364,0.89972734,0.08274307,0.00023702798,0.000858305,0.000053142663,0.00008691454,0.0005728853,0.009456846,0.00005854139],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01774023,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06896963,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9946454,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010978339,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05025278,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41278046},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7117310381","doi":"10.1111/bioe.70069","title":"Forget Plagiarism: It's Originality, Utility, and Contribution That Matter in Academia Now","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Bioethics","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Space (punctuation); Odds; Minor (academic); Content (measure theory); Ask price; Content analysis","score_opus":0.06507306586300662,"score_gpt":0.39830954486182996,"score_spread":0.33323647899882336,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7117310381","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0192592,0.10022064,0.008867993,0.77175456,0.01659851,0.000030804313,0.000375871,0.0007950358,0.08209731],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5607797,0.0911297,0.008649138,0.19716005,0.041139305,0.00012920785,0.00083347235,0.0019730963,0.098206334],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.96997344,0.011854149,0.0021795717,0.0034671174,0.010948716,0.0015769292],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8799424,0.06324625,0.010384646,0.013060752,0.022276843,0.011089105],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.027380146,0.00066890125,0.001298935,0.0057835467,0.013066369,0.041202083,0.0018526705,0.0073344586,0.019437825],"category_scores_gemma":[0.13954486,0.0005915203,0.0006045774,0.010079277,0.029778702,0.051669996,0.009219474,0.007688393,0.012932659],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021693893,0.000085197826,0.009793026,0.0012021352,0.000077053846,0.00048903655,0.041945882,0.00023916984,0.0008597027,0.20000635,0.3536104,0.39147508],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022618578,0.000095120486,0.004964747,0.0019427696,0.00006936093,0.00096200086,0.03435669,0.00021488765,0.00085310725,0.20088941,0.7555032,0.00012610253],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0054279007,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005494507,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9926655,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010824804,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009170666,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1448018},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7117465603","doi":"10.1007/s40979-025-00211-9","title":"Beyond plagiarism: transforming pedagogy to help students write with sources","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal for Educational Integrity","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Sheridan College","funders":"","keywords":"Unpacking; Key (lock); Teaching method; Professional writing; Work (physics)","score_opus":0.02564644105414007,"score_gpt":0.43611940607713123,"score_spread":0.4104729650229912,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7117465603","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012878787,0.71008784,0.08217313,0.067386635,0.009299972,0.00038349908,0.00006823495,0.0015101405,0.11621177],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.09591661,0.7618739,0.05959984,0.016050497,0.0036976128,0.0006674088,0.00018971183,0.0009008323,0.061103553],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9947643,0.002785513,0.0002983016,0.00023068732,0.0017167645,0.00020434879],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9913476,0.006533008,0.0005696169,0.00031632365,0.0008681509,0.0003652731],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00447386,0.0006722785,0.00079736416,0.002362057,0.0018077717,0.00741154,0.0017489876,0.0023226177,0.0032546008],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015213691,0.0003835416,0.00061032147,0.0018334787,0.005503177,0.00813551,0.00413209,0.0049748924,0.002642173],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026645646,0.0001329963,0.00070055365,0.0056791,0.000038929466,0.00025991382,0.037226144,0.00033158925,0.0014566495,0.052650746,0.072930865,0.8285659],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021799482,0.00010113025,0.0012624373,0.0072709452,0.000028838724,0.0010666851,0.010536793,0.00020358255,0.0014185602,0.022426998,0.9556303,0.00003179468],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010098399,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021648759,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9976774,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001407254,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004038252,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.023660362},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"not_applicable","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["research_integrity"],"domain":null,"study_design":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre":"commentary","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W7117726584","doi":"10.22146/jpsi.107932","title":"Academic Cheating with Generative AI in Higher Education: An Extended Model of the Theory of Planned Behavior with Motivational Antecedents","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Jurnal Psikologi","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Education and Early Childhood Development","funders":"","keywords":"Cheating; Theory of planned behavior; Structural equation modeling; Variance (accounting); Control (management); Psychological intervention; Confirmatory factor analysis; Perceived control; Behavioral modeling","score_opus":0.05094714940109164,"score_gpt":0.35245444587095914,"score_spread":0.3015072964698675,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7117726584","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.64218587,0.00053315255,0.3255772,0.0031075226,0.00008145262,0.00056937005,0.00022305678,0.00023152422,0.02749092],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97869134,0.00019664258,0.019640336,0.00009884369,0.00001449225,0.00028660783,0.000047367095,0.000009235673,0.0010153023],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99860233,0.0008688306,0.00005236706,0.00018133898,0.00017215047,0.00012297444],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9957562,0.0027202473,0.0007223717,0.00020178535,0.00039741737,0.00020184963],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022114401,0.00062269054,0.00044193678,0.00089704746,0.00046733738,0.0014971059,0.0008646791,0.00084578403,0.0017327328],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0048354524,0.00040542168,0.0009034963,0.0006254605,0.0013816673,0.0013877208,0.0006287591,0.0011509587,0.0002270399],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003946849,0.0023279516,0.33976337,0.0006849206,0.0007119575,0.0011234651,0.016495092,0.13293289,0.004915853,0.38744864,0.0017293039,0.11147185],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019289445,0.0013334549,0.14325479,0.00033037996,0.00039962068,0.0006988693,0.002944368,0.5542544,0.0009719852,0.28931364,0.0061550904,0.00015055708],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006532008,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0072239046,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9991542,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015959941,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025446366,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.012987971},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7120575374","doi":"","title":"Autoria: um dilema ético da ciência","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas)","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Misconduct; Scientific misconduct; Context (archaeology); Rigour; Work (physics); Quality (philosophy); Narrative","score_opus":0.02443600867254054,"score_gpt":0.27462118383223355,"score_spread":0.250185175159693,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7120575374","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.027209442,0.3829815,0.015388495,0.20923553,0.023155602,0.00043099426,0.00088050787,0.0008118297,0.33990598],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5909289,0.2778586,0.022149008,0.033565693,0.026291246,0.0010466705,0.00060101214,0.0008016113,0.046757266],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9569683,0.027352072,0.0019201249,0.0038357659,0.008120227,0.0018036647],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9092951,0.054787178,0.008885759,0.009267447,0.013940907,0.003823668],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.024027698,0.0013850967,0.0025941965,0.008836373,0.0064700614,0.026786927,0.0026664864,0.0058747577,0.015175943],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06573791,0.0006651563,0.0011876062,0.010536039,0.026462223,0.01398686,0.00858329,0.01061955,0.0036928388],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015748954,0.00012479175,0.005454941,0.008824802,0.00012546909,0.0017482259,0.0603184,0.00057372346,0.0006676453,0.5656722,0.10454043,0.25179178],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003057932,0.00006652222,0.002643065,0.009182746,0.000057161404,0.0014889106,0.016727379,0.00027553373,0.00031242138,0.043446314,0.9257161,0.000053255753],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008014404,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0064326203,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99412525,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010784801,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.021492276,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1270721},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128297725","doi":"10.15640/jehd.v12n2a2","title":"Promoting Academic Integrity: Utilizing Code of Conduct Statements with Students in an Online Course during the Pandemic","year":2023,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Education and Human Development","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cheating; Academic integrity; Academic dishonesty; Code of conduct; Code (set theory); Ethical code; Intervention (counseling); Pandemic","score_opus":0.15887247519659217,"score_gpt":0.4667077332598074,"score_spread":0.3078352580632152,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128297725","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99414945,0.000030079758,0.0013702177,0.0016792773,0.000063007166,0.00018760395,0.00000931942,0.000052553365,0.0024585433],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99463046,0.000077020864,0.0032572574,0.00060513173,0.000026546943,0.00017190489,0.000015766298,0.000013054352,0.0012028676],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9831292,0.012567321,0.00047385506,0.0005999013,0.0017303262,0.0014993802],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94108945,0.0217554,0.014201131,0.0052549425,0.0056720343,0.012026979],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018178936,0.0005919357,0.000498243,0.00081696844,0.008941706,0.0048097298,0.0015119129,0.0018365216,0.0020795234],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07140532,0.0004653093,0.00043672285,0.00046337568,0.004306074,0.0034207203,0.0042799762,0.0043348554,0.0006336482],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006257389,0.014118855,0.16147876,0.00033734998,0.00006922534,0.001247254,0.6005473,0.00053679827,0.014944801,0.002463769,0.0080239875,0.19560623],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002472359,0.009581529,0.19916506,0.000891088,0.00013755326,0.0017890618,0.7126629,0.004917732,0.01681949,0.004838185,0.048425004,0.0005251296],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005441442,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012710848,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99816346,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030742064,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00888445,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09614056},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7129057070","doi":"10.1515/9783110756784-007","title":"131Chapter 6 The researcher’s ethical dilemma: Affect in reporting L2 student plagiarism","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Affect (linguistics); Interview; Confidentiality; Control (management)","score_opus":0.10209040501376412,"score_gpt":0.4201454656326228,"score_spread":0.3180550606188587,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7129057070","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0032792117,0.0052798493,0.0092478935,0.06347688,0.004238056,0.00019111016,0.00043950538,0.00030703846,0.9135404],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.038048387,0.0030458511,0.005953242,0.017493535,0.0016820916,0.00023422527,0.00027469711,0.0003319937,0.9329359],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974955,0.0012540612,0.000102789774,0.00015104262,0.0007890547,0.00020754107],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960129,0.002796003,0.00015199812,0.00018360405,0.0007294463,0.00012602229],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023552498,0.00047119526,0.00032683156,0.0013679594,0.004476441,0.005642655,0.0010834701,0.0046928166,0.05945085],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009453179,0.00045855957,0.00049517164,0.0009320466,0.004525477,0.0032422012,0.002193858,0.0045581795,0.016286504],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000099608,0.000031207055,0.0003260411,0.00018721556,0.0000041587623,0.0003264395,0.008172746,0.000075499804,0.00038590957,0.24296433,0.70591486,0.041601643],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000050824146,0.000017541599,0.0013377732,0.00064607034,0.000005296379,0.00052342104,0.004308886,0.00015414225,0.0006950704,0.045307666,0.94697064,0.000028376322],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0128058335,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.030905832,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9953072,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029602381,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031145671,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19888288},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7143517616","doi":"10.22176/act24.4.25","title":"On the Ethics of Mentorship in Authorship, Reviewership, and Editorship-","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Action Criticism and Theory for Music Education","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Mentorship; Publishing; Field (mathematics); Process (computing); Information ethics; Ethical issues; Confidentiality","score_opus":0.0888729368956778,"score_gpt":0.4144369559603744,"score_spread":0.32556401906469656,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7143517616","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06816213,0.012598977,0.07759355,0.6242636,0.006911628,0.00024842724,0.000039573497,0.00020659257,0.20997554],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9455328,0.0016468669,0.010073353,0.024035726,0.003090047,0.00025013692,0.000013311029,0.00018256757,0.015175217],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.54272074,0.38549742,0.011395077,0.0107229715,0.043038476,0.0066253184],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.34579992,0.524201,0.043407805,0.037187044,0.03943215,0.0099721765],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.3050216,0.0005439939,0.0010192629,0.0022633204,0.017681696,0.028308881,0.003342343,0.014739891,0.0030537301],"category_scores_gemma":[0.45448482,0.0007343647,0.0007639414,0.0017247973,0.10283208,0.022196267,0.014662656,0.014840966,0.0013435391],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007637953,0.00003861373,0.0021516634,0.00015417191,0.0000310471,0.00024451595,0.0720231,0.0003241524,0.00023146151,0.89572835,0.008243655,0.020752823],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000079904836,0.00013218947,0.001345998,0.0007827397,0.000032242133,0.0005021954,0.02048873,0.000970219,0.0013291716,0.8051758,0.16904104,0.00011976596],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001508825,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017274817,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9852601,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008127807,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.021186547,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.85703206},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7143875396","doi":"10.34577/0002000287","title":"研究提言：カナダの研究者による研究不正の分析査読論文撤回を 対象とした研究","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"Institutional Repositories DataBase (IRDB)","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Misconduct; Scientific misconduct; Rigour; Scientific literature; Scientific evidence","score_opus":0.01806422344481797,"score_gpt":0.31183661181315775,"score_spread":0.2937723883683398,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7143875396","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5177035,0.032645136,0.04697695,0.07405242,0.001658044,0.0016255248,0.016781341,0.00074633793,0.30781084],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9391846,0.0117419725,0.028877407,0.0031242634,0.0005849943,0.00039675066,0.0030765038,0.00015714062,0.01285645],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9371224,0.012856047,0.008235021,0.0042942306,0.03567733,0.0018150181],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6118463,0.16859418,0.07143336,0.020944275,0.120937705,0.0062441826],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.057303887,0.00034699,0.0010124274,0.022547297,0.0059261066,0.010878043,0.0019618613,0.00089200726,0.009477607],"category_scores_gemma":[0.19366612,0.00039919425,0.0006428503,0.0318308,0.006689926,0.007898958,0.0032449083,0.001663499,0.0025768061],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002579303,0.00015969638,0.39111286,0.0070169517,0.0006058521,0.00070575,0.028304148,0.0006573221,0.0037838565,0.05577315,0.02480527,0.48681715],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004532641,0.00025405257,0.60840225,0.005549093,0.00087415235,0.0020362658,0.04994205,0.0022818975,0.012473193,0.054682303,0.26318264,0.000276691],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09380581,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.17843476,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.999108,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013735543,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.033492733,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30305558},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7161955054","doi":"10.3138/cjccj-2026-0201","title":"Predatory Journals and AI-Assisted Plagiarism of Scientific Research: Bootlegging Research as a New Criminological Reality","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice/La Revue canadienne de criminologie et de justice pénale","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Legitimacy; Raising (metalworking); Set (abstract data type); Phenomenon; Academic community; Generative grammar","score_opus":0.39453424809621307,"score_gpt":0.4702968027787905,"score_spread":0.07576255468257742,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7161955054","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11895812,0.09463168,0.027518231,0.57376575,0.0062789912,0.0002422329,0.00032748398,0.00091159955,0.17736591],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8771928,0.0355141,0.016988853,0.03951203,0.010382025,0.00012160775,0.0001916175,0.0003727747,0.019724267],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9184166,0.04069852,0.00488844,0.003998864,0.029670063,0.0023274326],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.5661342,0.25316644,0.07331824,0.05398016,0.03770666,0.015694305],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.054007526,0.00041847245,0.0008437017,0.015373192,0.011558465,0.026834097,0.002141391,0.0075209276,0.0048304964],"category_scores_gemma":[0.22227122,0.00063164154,0.0006479726,0.014229107,0.03978882,0.020115888,0.008071855,0.007767274,0.0015367664],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002135617,0.00009525745,0.023241023,0.001471787,0.00014515125,0.0030351398,0.11173652,0.0003943389,0.0017649953,0.6119218,0.05329589,0.19268444],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005510309,0.00019921317,0.018817492,0.0028907137,0.00009489614,0.0065146065,0.029867174,0.0008158342,0.0023406264,0.3036816,0.6344361,0.00028662136],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0058508785,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010012924,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99414915,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011824699,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015871482,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28562254},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7164668588","doi":"10.14288/bctj.v11i1.653","title":"Investigating First-Year University Student Plagiarism: Fostering a Culture of Academic Integrity","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Thompson Rivers University","funders":"","keywords":"Academic integrity; Commit; Academic dishonesty; Higher education; Research integrity; Personal Integrity","score_opus":0.24681699108544192,"score_gpt":0.5507729842772933,"score_spread":0.30395599319185135,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7164668588","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99077994,0.0003818436,0.00030838497,0.002311649,0.000023097331,0.00006872768,0.00005786943,0.00001664565,0.006051781],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99736553,0.00035360598,0.00036286423,0.0002786158,0.000009458001,0.000026811384,0.000035013552,0.0000055189666,0.0015625845],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9901634,0.0028681175,0.00052628235,0.0005945043,0.0039069094,0.0019407774],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9432325,0.011629439,0.016412852,0.002910056,0.014946772,0.010868389],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009692174,0.00031353274,0.0004903956,0.0041465983,0.017138386,0.0098400535,0.0024230788,0.0011794318,0.0023890587],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0423514,0.00035255187,0.00024266973,0.0042229467,0.006324782,0.003007005,0.0054113967,0.002968148,0.00042443562],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004933477,0.00025599924,0.46825594,0.00024599422,0.000024986128,0.00032717938,0.47838575,0.000057669058,0.00092294347,0.002046144,0.0028571517,0.04657097],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000047386234,0.00013545489,0.44490066,0.00024133961,0.00001738876,0.00018118192,0.5392208,0.00017504573,0.0008830716,0.00058986066,0.013597473,0.000052955427],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.46640608,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6717756,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99882054,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.028450489,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.050987512,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9273826},"labels":[{"model":"gemma","categories":[],"domain":null,"study_design":"qualitative","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"low"},{"model":"gpt","categories":["research_integrity"],"domain":null,"study_design":"observational","genre":"empirical","about_ca_system":false,"about_ca_topic":false,"confidence":"high"}],"label_agreement":"split"},{"id":"W82288932","doi":"","title":"À quoi pensent les stagiaires avant leur premier stage","year":2001,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Érudit (Université de Montréal)","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.01701058308414939,"score_gpt":0.2138174616309733,"score_spread":0.19680687854682388,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W82288932","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08697251,0.020610178,0.034365557,0.24890721,0.020868493,0.0006361566,0.0016478805,0.002249329,0.5837427],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.22955318,0.003339921,0.0084064305,0.007873332,0.0040791947,0.00012848787,0.00039805812,0.0006021643,0.74561924],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99187636,0.0022106478,0.0003642343,0.0005631035,0.0037929115,0.001192745],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97314405,0.0054460177,0.0022250253,0.003620718,0.012611421,0.0029527198],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009195914,0.00063302706,0.0006679549,0.0033467521,0.011735444,0.016951714,0.0016074475,0.0043445122,0.04640415],"category_scores_gemma":[0.037677575,0.0005310129,0.00087162724,0.0022840654,0.0055645024,0.006017113,0.0040963367,0.008866979,0.014043285],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005282855,0.00024241567,0.013886197,0.00042013012,0.000111826914,0.0011574135,0.03143664,0.00052093517,0.010520991,0.49771246,0.22074321,0.22271955],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025633803,0.0001153668,0.0098293135,0.00015732346,0.000024505147,0.00047196704,0.0038289223,0.00026911858,0.0041091177,0.017441103,0.96365476,0.00007289699],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.052396305,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11382394,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.052396305,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008294284,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016952308,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15523738},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W980649888","doi":"10.31542/j.muse.182","title":"To Cheat or Not to Cheat: That’s the Marketing Research Question","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"MacEwan University Student eJournal","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"MacEwan University","funders":"","keywords":"Cheating; Mindset; Academic dishonesty; Academic integrity; Psychology; Perception; Face (sociological concept); Medical education; Public relations; Computer science; Political science; Sociology; Social psychology; Medicine; Social science","score_opus":0.08090650819015592,"score_gpt":0.4017531558556057,"score_spread":0.3208466476654498,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W980649888","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23917419,0.003781763,0.008199488,0.66837037,0.0020411697,0.00019887091,0.00041922682,0.00009839474,0.07771664],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95172405,0.0017672156,0.0034044518,0.036218263,0.00083700917,0.00009409751,0.000055736415,0.000051215582,0.0058480464],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9907699,0.005249706,0.00036819215,0.00077077054,0.0017815615,0.0010599329],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9351144,0.040705737,0.0061233426,0.0034131138,0.009731952,0.0049114563],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01732875,0.0003012062,0.0007065036,0.0007954714,0.0030272217,0.0074231434,0.0010836353,0.0040253885,0.012012702],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06330808,0.00017180908,0.0005503154,0.0011962109,0.007111049,0.016612167,0.0013280958,0.0049424223,0.00238482],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005881115,0.002578695,0.15659776,0.0015615919,0.00038738293,0.0006572202,0.061121024,0.0005990497,0.0037484404,0.16304748,0.1466419,0.46247137],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021289822,0.0014916621,0.13111292,0.0030464083,0.00024669588,0.0027529984,0.36762688,0.00268395,0.0052351956,0.20882507,0.27633125,0.00043407982],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026657067,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024122463,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9959746,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002107319,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033789866,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09164429},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}