{"meta":{"query_hash":"0eb1897fd3be","filters":{"topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies"},"cohort_total":207,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":207,"exported":207,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/0eb1897fd3be","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?topic=Comparative+constitutional+jurisprudence+studies"},"results":[{"id":"W10626397","doi":"","title":"Protesta social y libertad de expresión en Canadá: reflexiones y lecciones del G-20 en Toronto*","year":2012,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Derecho Comparado de la Información","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Limiting; Democracy; Context (archaeology); Political science; Persona; Cartography; Human rights; Geography; Law; Art; Politics; Engineering; Archaeology","score_opus":0.024951060247061157,"score_gpt":0.3909826082076545,"score_spread":0.36603154796059334,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W10626397","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6883599,0.008246837,0.0024981264,0.0067502744,0.0018179951,0.0018620371,0.00018186783,0.00049212185,0.2897908],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9914378,0.0013392573,0.0022523822,0.00068485184,0.002349922,0.0003160015,0.00002988781,0.000036461144,0.0015534542],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9941841,0.0016524824,0.00086001045,0.0004133448,0.0010556115,0.0018344526],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99654007,0.0016968733,0.00044500444,0.00035655254,0.00031319505,0.00064827636],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025553815,0.00065974356,0.000813673,0.0001655421,0.0022108937,0.00045005704,0.0011066014,0.00056212256,0.0004783132],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005948923,0.0006768954,0.00031618788,0.0005104089,0.0014992675,0.0025361632,0.00043154648,0.0007994326,0.00030558452],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003310216,0.00048835983,0.21526329,0.00021529448,0.0004474532,0.000018567369,0.19302726,0.00010505746,0.00044884594,0.54375845,0.036292933,0.009603448],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00093482557,0.00008599461,0.18954855,0.00020203581,0.00016807932,0.00006312484,0.016915502,0.00038585035,0.00054442073,0.0026145992,0.7874882,0.0010487819],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018776976,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013725885,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7511953,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025927257,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020989843,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995682},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W111790151","doi":"","title":"Bjarne Melkevik, Tolérance et modernité juridique","year":2011,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Revista europea de historia de las ideas políticas y de las instituciones públicas/Revista europea de historia de las ideas políticas y de las instituciones públicas","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04542877346598837,"score_gpt":0.33056225603441725,"score_spread":0.28513348256842885,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W111790151","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18309143,0.11651145,0.06440058,0.026428776,0.020751629,0.012095754,0.0035772205,0.008021509,0.56512165],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9266496,0.018874597,0.01851432,0.007808955,0.013316888,0.0010206437,0.00024166412,0.0014037016,0.012169677],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9593046,0.014153486,0.0068118083,0.006221408,0.0043462156,0.0091624865],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9750626,0.0034357854,0.0044525946,0.00630444,0.0040241634,0.006720391],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.013843551,0.0054105953,0.006180584,0.0031925926,0.0065550064,0.003609821,0.008686111,0.0028519505,0.0012773001],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021769227,0.006145215,0.0028421057,0.0065232217,0.007900519,0.0035894706,0.0030611467,0.0074747857,0.0041638142],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0020558292,0.002540387,0.006567201,0.0018966082,0.0013711175,0.006320897,0.017145788,0.00062432396,0.002844112,0.8673208,0.090271935,0.0010410362],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004889283,0.0009688355,0.005305638,0.0034460912,0.0032127688,0.002920432,0.0008823395,0.0011453278,0.0003380339,0.011328664,0.9597297,0.0058329017],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006974244,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030821268,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8694577,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.026003247,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02125417,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996384},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1181913477","doi":"","title":"La irregularidad lógica y lo a priori constitutivo","year":2014,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Repositorio Universidad de Caldas","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy","score_opus":0.011496556435950739,"score_gpt":0.31600626782148916,"score_spread":0.3045097113855384,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1181913477","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24759057,0.0011875426,0.0044475696,0.0031026392,0.0028372991,0.0005105987,0.000022485232,0.00025377082,0.7400475],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9919704,0.00037690025,0.0005312801,0.00013560797,0.0017125867,0.0000081020635,0.0000036498798,0.000018145092,0.00524332],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9958314,0.0012486926,0.00041796765,0.0007505295,0.0009540848,0.00079732604],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996918,0.001231959,0.0003256157,0.00050755026,0.00055037846,0.0004664758],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010210199,0.00043698176,0.0006023627,0.00022385201,0.0019272838,0.0007489571,0.00071967876,0.00045517867,0.00007719015],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007642103,0.00047388635,0.00032992798,0.00084412657,0.0038973633,0.00047323803,0.0003362731,0.00060453376,0.00028219007],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000972006,0.00017180464,0.021068921,0.00005174709,0.00023439122,0.00031049034,0.0059611667,0.00006229209,0.0013253506,0.96234304,0.0056647365,0.0027088455],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008323739,0.00013833378,0.01653562,0.00035587125,0.00025002167,0.000079992016,0.003999807,0.00012561654,0.0004590901,0.0011371318,0.9755066,0.0005795575],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015765278,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00015826852,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96984184,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014460788,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019971202,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997713},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W128472689","doi":"","title":"El convenio de Montreal de 1999 y su ratificación en América Latina","year":2006,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Revista de responsabilidad civil y seguros: publicación mensual de doctrina, jurisprudencia y legislación","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.011894156471634854,"score_gpt":0.3223603464990078,"score_spread":0.31046619002737297,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W128472689","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.79324824,0.0077683195,0.0061777346,0.018060545,0.0009288536,0.0045160307,0.0013830462,0.0015395143,0.16637771],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97956514,0.007385499,0.0019363996,0.0007052201,0.0034216286,0.00089375244,0.0001320129,0.00023723733,0.005723126],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9729258,0.010787515,0.0033284808,0.0032350998,0.0036434284,0.0060796654],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98410445,0.007696033,0.0018059106,0.0024463367,0.0018159944,0.0021312695],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.014604586,0.0023762279,0.003002205,0.0014427573,0.00332542,0.0048724096,0.0037687796,0.0017079758,0.000489248],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011269624,0.002622856,0.0016594809,0.005139185,0.0045295693,0.0019914743,0.0011390415,0.0029882288,0.0005808144],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0024819376,0.002555094,0.09634312,0.00081430824,0.00081470376,0.0012362691,0.0130182495,0.00064367836,0.016592307,0.80206865,0.047575336,0.015856368],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00273288,0.0007702789,0.1793147,0.00079029804,0.0007200483,0.00044533945,0.003492133,0.001040344,0.0014637735,0.008034772,0.79840523,0.00279021],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010913736,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0039491714,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7940339,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010205339,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012938441,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999588},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W143537392","doi":"10.47623/ivap-rvap.82.2008.2.07","title":"DERECHOS FUNDAMENTALES EN EL SISTEMA CONSTITUCIONAL CANADIENSE: ENTRE LA CARTA CONSTITUCIONAL Y LOS CÓDIGOS PROVINCIALES","year":2008,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Revista Vasca de Administración Pública / Herri-Arduralaritzarako Euskal Aldizkaria","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.027559763743527574,"score_gpt":0.34695963254340406,"score_spread":0.3193998687998765,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W143537392","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8609747,0.013513836,0.0004253627,0.021872891,0.002117222,0.0052271383,0.0074370676,0.00078752526,0.08764423],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9888009,0.0034903323,0.0012728476,0.0007593777,0.0019841397,0.0003596749,0.00037734746,0.00011685748,0.0028385113],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9864618,0.0028986274,0.0024938143,0.0024599538,0.0029959038,0.0026899015],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9907733,0.003546616,0.001266918,0.001144622,0.0013054346,0.0019630725],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022845594,0.0018567493,0.002421892,0.0006261548,0.004739254,0.001198338,0.0021376996,0.001201624,0.0017164552],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030668813,0.0019672522,0.0013554583,0.0016179834,0.01150376,0.0012460306,0.00081824476,0.0019707754,0.0006519826],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00044578954,0.0013995196,0.1629559,0.0007956092,0.0014325177,0.0024108284,0.0045978473,0.000039163224,0.0008575667,0.80612904,0.017983174,0.000953086],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0023531532,0.00039708335,0.10518417,0.0017645372,0.000794767,0.0030496067,0.0036604016,0.00009391656,0.0002819165,0.0009590974,0.8790318,0.0024295726],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036783821,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010177511,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8610486,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029377227,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014895246,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99983853},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W147117113","doi":"","title":"Aportes del derecho comparado a los sistemas alternativos de resolución de amparos del derecho de acceso a la información en Chile","year":2011,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Revista de Derechos Fundamentales","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Transparency (behavior); Freedom of information; Political science; Humanities; Derecho; Access to information; Cartography; Welfare economics; Geography; Law; Philosophy; Library science; Computer science; Economics","score_opus":0.05936737371831189,"score_gpt":0.37471299896168403,"score_spread":0.3153456252433721,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W147117113","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9298838,0.013634191,0.011297893,0.0006574119,0.00023775766,0.0021788003,0.00042475853,0.00041147775,0.041273925],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97521996,0.010067358,0.011988195,0.0008236212,0.0005303791,0.0005288718,0.00004934457,0.00009296093,0.0006992892],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99131954,0.0024014066,0.0015791703,0.0011344723,0.0012512873,0.0023141094],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99458474,0.0020889807,0.0010905578,0.0008143622,0.00039023656,0.0010311037],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034642362,0.0011249876,0.0014521228,0.0004903947,0.0021136412,0.0013960267,0.0021157668,0.0005891291,0.00069041236],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012853554,0.0011902532,0.00071273546,0.0010234668,0.0030289988,0.0012136203,0.000769016,0.0012396313,0.00035032426],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00048186886,0.0015980855,0.8346684,0.0010543737,0.0013526581,0.00032159872,0.055547062,0.00006742994,0.0026321001,0.09217908,0.004313452,0.0057838806],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00510924,0.0008822602,0.45383272,0.009188686,0.0020802773,0.001350384,0.05066638,0.0033278633,0.020226486,0.0143663995,0.4339592,0.0050101215],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005384599,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002170245,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.42964572,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038227867,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032087371,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996842},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1484821786","doi":"","title":"Bjarne Melkevik, Droit et agir communicationnel: Penser avec Habermas, Éditions Buenos Books International, París, 2012, 117 pp","year":2012,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Revista europea de historia de las ideas políticas y de las instituciones públicas/Revista europea de historia de las ideas políticas y de las instituciones públicas","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.030135965191148174,"score_gpt":0.3387568070745507,"score_spread":0.3086208418834025,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1484821786","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11551806,0.19511001,0.043346666,0.089460224,0.033628203,0.013343947,0.006414765,0.007855993,0.49532214],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91279393,0.027650315,0.012640156,0.008030513,0.016337652,0.0011056216,0.0008258906,0.0011155503,0.019500356],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.96598464,0.012308647,0.006073001,0.0040664403,0.0040474697,0.007519804],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97511905,0.004445748,0.004258855,0.006212375,0.003968918,0.005995038],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0129501335,0.0041393326,0.0045617335,0.0026342196,0.007495456,0.0039477097,0.00862724,0.0021295832,0.0017142809],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019718805,0.0048384448,0.0023284233,0.0044826297,0.0073988787,0.0051146485,0.0034393042,0.0065175565,0.004781879],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000755321,0.0024287608,0.007691104,0.0007942413,0.001289888,0.0012639235,0.009555327,0.0003541678,0.001434403,0.7214684,0.25244325,0.00052122195],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004318494,0.00044044983,0.0075046406,0.0025919394,0.0030313313,0.0027993952,0.0011525135,0.00087221264,0.00011575514,0.005760595,0.9667444,0.0046682474],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034363787,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021348721,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7972759,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.026741052,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010496075,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99919826},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1494723118","doi":"","title":"La justicia en la República: fortalezas y debilidades de la teoría","year":2007,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Revista philosophica","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; SOCRATES; Philosophy; Economic Justice; Political science; Soul; Law; Theology; Epistemology","score_opus":0.025070186430379154,"score_gpt":0.39907283654127534,"score_spread":0.3740026501108962,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1494723118","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2192106,0.0077371723,0.0008776507,0.011576504,0.00023574197,0.00072889926,0.000065047054,0.00024767872,0.75932074],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9921967,0.0045278464,0.00062926963,0.00027136997,0.0019044299,0.000033959914,0.0000062036065,0.0000348394,0.00039538334],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9945802,0.0021530918,0.0007507651,0.0007376375,0.00094079645,0.0008375007],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98964477,0.0088114925,0.00034099107,0.0004914846,0.00033668315,0.00037460835],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0069009573,0.00046676683,0.00069751596,0.0002473246,0.0010865417,0.0007017925,0.0008018865,0.00052945217,0.00016220337],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0054357587,0.0004528356,0.00034726923,0.0010218876,0.0051007536,0.0003261887,0.0003608353,0.0009300978,0.00017711162],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007479535,0.00026115263,0.019068195,0.00020463635,0.00016148524,0.00029386347,0.0040052384,0.0000052465502,0.0003185513,0.96958226,0.0013314782,0.0046931114],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00041309625,0.00008244591,0.09132596,0.000777572,0.00031662514,0.00008686337,0.0018471706,0.000012998862,0.00007553503,0.054655816,0.8497943,0.0006115972],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00013692828,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005289143,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9149264,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00049404707,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00093154534,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99979234},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1504049924","doi":"","title":"CONTRIBUCIÓN EN TORNO AL PRINCIPIO PRESUNCIÓN DE INOCENCIA EN EL MARCO DEL NUEVO MODELO ACUSATORIO DE ENJUICIAMIENTO PENAL (Ley 906 de 2004)","year":2016,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Optech (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.018064299080289097,"score_gpt":0.36315269851228527,"score_spread":0.34508839943199615,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1504049924","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8632046,0.0023388858,0.057219293,0.016145261,0.0009845779,0.0013018642,0.0003502778,0.00031370143,0.058141515],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9861494,0.0021533342,0.003114372,0.001078115,0.0014179561,0.00015514746,0.000005394547,0.000034981524,0.0058913385],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9932891,0.0013046986,0.00080608745,0.0009898945,0.0015467802,0.0020634204],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99541473,0.0020370367,0.00033651426,0.00049200706,0.00094016426,0.00077955716],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003352892,0.00065604533,0.00076753466,0.00022209647,0.0012182682,0.00026654918,0.0013729933,0.0004362805,0.0008150858],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031487609,0.00051237026,0.0003437459,0.0005571975,0.0015088225,0.0009144504,0.00077302166,0.0004725455,0.00049671484],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004055442,0.00045009356,0.4825791,0.00004013447,0.00043500925,0.00007128636,0.013389143,0.00020614751,0.009955921,0.46089128,0.028022902,0.0035534287],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0042182743,0.00043591287,0.6773969,0.000914997,0.00046229427,0.0000522687,0.0047367327,0.0033504688,0.005409647,0.03973411,0.2610628,0.0022256046],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007790484,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006087804,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.42115718,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005104293,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006381822,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997328},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W150547283","doi":"","title":"Derecho internacional público: Nuevos desarrollos en la lucha contra el cambio climático (Montreal, de 28 de noviembre a 10 de diciembre de 2005)","year":2006,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Revista Española de Derecho Internacional","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Geography; Art","score_opus":0.01157654099512987,"score_gpt":0.3298662709470799,"score_spread":0.31828972995195,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W150547283","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8905564,0.012978997,0.036863193,0.011455489,0.00067863415,0.0015970882,0.0011929104,0.00045328992,0.044224016],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9812096,0.003537871,0.00340253,0.0017628454,0.002695617,0.0003393685,0.00009786391,0.00012457387,0.0068297675],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98902595,0.0031118449,0.0016085415,0.0014645486,0.0016260581,0.0031630553],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99310327,0.0033903064,0.00089270057,0.00068445766,0.0007948834,0.0011344035],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0046284827,0.0012718997,0.0014956659,0.00056992285,0.0012971174,0.0015435274,0.0022641367,0.0010298091,0.0013767319],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023632073,0.0013567299,0.0011025618,0.00073150033,0.0022799189,0.00068664877,0.00067016925,0.0019931789,0.0005561638],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0021944945,0.002620579,0.39698943,0.00063266803,0.0018219508,0.001749944,0.0093637705,0.0006813742,0.010652133,0.46078363,0.104467504,0.008042522],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005004788,0.0004101145,0.21969463,0.0048447317,0.0010044834,0.0020399627,0.0046805055,0.0078110765,0.0017418624,0.012933193,0.73707193,0.0027626944],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013297105,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010250654,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6326045,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007030007,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006984566,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99953616},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1506244429","doi":"10.18046/prec.v5.1972","title":"Entre la Seguridad Democrática y la Legalidad Democrática. Políticas Constitucionales y la reelección presidencial en Colombia","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Precedente Revista Jurídica","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin für Sozialforschung; University of Cambridge","keywords":"Principle of legality; Democracy; Referendum; Political science; Politics; Law; Argument (complex analysis); Presidential system; Declaration of independence; Presidential election; Political economy; Public administration; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.012188362290775185,"score_gpt":0.33076137862428184,"score_spread":0.31857301633350665,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1506244429","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12346141,0.0022039707,0.0037591048,0.01157948,0.0005324356,0.0014129225,0.00009163247,0.00056602625,0.85639304],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9931426,0.0012541523,0.0011564055,0.00020723042,0.00063477334,0.000117018935,0.000015740487,0.000032394495,0.0034396546],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9923801,0.0039325026,0.0007235465,0.00082058785,0.0013010602,0.000842205],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99138904,0.006940416,0.00029885027,0.00045668916,0.00043237366,0.00048262844],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030016997,0.000461102,0.0007341165,0.00020088417,0.0013972145,0.00076603185,0.0009945828,0.00033734814,0.00067767815],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008110406,0.00046239572,0.0003044597,0.00055462704,0.003852007,0.0004896234,0.00045536424,0.0006636601,0.00050794194],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000106813524,0.00018330375,0.020000927,0.00007932151,0.00016971034,0.000055679182,0.003315473,0.0000073311544,0.00025926286,0.9557337,0.015483377,0.004605103],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00067871565,0.000079333564,0.03092065,0.0004670291,0.00024247839,0.00008459993,0.0010394829,0.000058283033,0.00012387625,0.0069067064,0.9587944,0.0006044501],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00023966595,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011397126,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94882697,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003230058,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015230819,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99990284},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1506863873","doi":"","title":"Dificultades y logros, de la aplicación de la convención de Ottawa sobre la prohibición del empleo, almacenamiento, producción y transferencia de minas antipersonales y sobre su destrucción, en Colombia. Análisis del caso comparativo Colombia – Angola, 1999 – 2004","year":2012,"lang":"es","type":"dissertation","venue":"reponame:Repositorio Institucional EdocUR","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Physics; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.014606790548730268,"score_gpt":0.332031706806381,"score_spread":0.31742491625765074,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1506863873","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9658458,0.0099516,0.0011674924,0.000773354,0.0021474087,0.002987673,0.0009477475,0.00045604008,0.015722862],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9855476,0.0032847815,0.0036026288,0.00012963213,0.0029470716,0.0014676519,0.00100275,0.00018840813,0.0018294895],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98255605,0.0062603443,0.0024016763,0.0026584005,0.0029879392,0.00313562],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98684174,0.0067894426,0.0016813806,0.0009502654,0.0021630768,0.0015741119],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0058364975,0.0022514393,0.0026324452,0.00072886015,0.0045646676,0.001488663,0.0020814824,0.0026302086,0.00008441111],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0040839287,0.0024090887,0.0012236102,0.0019714495,0.0050172713,0.0014601494,0.00031745617,0.0029904102,0.00008037709],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0017905467,0.0038528503,0.6756002,0.00147296,0.0020652018,0.0017500471,0.07268481,0.0011884862,0.038821213,0.18696554,0.011230296,0.0025778983],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0026748097,0.0005448692,0.8048871,0.002659398,0.0018950894,0.0029407027,0.01855226,0.0005816868,0.008162688,0.0022119952,0.15149823,0.003391171],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.025395272,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015750133,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18475354,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0057262657,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016932609,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995479},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1507571668","doi":"10.18543/ed-62(2)-2014pp207-234","title":"La protección del interés general por parte de la Administración y del Derecho administrativo. (Un estudio desde la teoría jurídica y la filosofía política)","year":2014,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Estudios de Deusto","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Intertek (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Political science; Derecho","score_opus":0.020936418701694562,"score_gpt":0.36405511198941,"score_spread":0.34311869328771544,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1507571668","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8539486,0.002142814,0.008302313,0.007685789,0.0005233297,0.0015629842,0.00015047123,0.0004244222,0.1252593],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9855218,0.0011459223,0.00936564,0.00052670576,0.0012509581,0.00078970304,0.000013482894,0.00009230091,0.0012935032],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98826253,0.006198705,0.0011142347,0.0013842882,0.0013527344,0.0016875252],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9913869,0.005773524,0.0006368988,0.00076188566,0.0005562357,0.00088459277],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.005437299,0.0010896884,0.0013081138,0.0002894033,0.0021004314,0.0008634439,0.0015153969,0.0009226183,0.00019872897],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005531277,0.0011014044,0.00055970234,0.00097032695,0.0062022,0.0005101129,0.000767969,0.0017957052,0.00033328877],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00053977175,0.0026376746,0.18950221,0.00031779218,0.0016017235,0.0013514793,0.01875427,0.0001211879,0.0011229984,0.7450816,0.016626991,0.022342315],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0031757255,0.0012452733,0.40174538,0.0012126167,0.0011332962,0.0010681136,0.008935953,0.0008063116,0.0019436245,0.014196636,0.56191736,0.0026197261],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00047569623,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009703785,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.73088497,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007702711,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035431487,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991987},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1511607720","doi":"","title":"José Calvo González, Octroi de sens. Exercices d’interprétation juridique-narratif, Les Presses de l´Université Laval","year":2011,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Revista europea de historia de las ideas políticas y de las instituciones públicas/Revista europea de historia de las ideas políticas y de las instituciones públicas","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02824098602298166,"score_gpt":0.2926529395725444,"score_spread":0.26441195354956276,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1511607720","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.48181093,0.11030687,0.048414752,0.024818452,0.014189664,0.009828821,0.003227561,0.0069319457,0.300471],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93477315,0.024738787,0.017493889,0.0029001338,0.011406962,0.0005182757,0.00027022467,0.00097468443,0.0069239065],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9688119,0.011101824,0.0049211476,0.0046280734,0.0031405857,0.0073964535],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98079437,0.0029868162,0.003700996,0.0040792916,0.0032654242,0.0051731034],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00944411,0.004128436,0.004476506,0.0027379293,0.0065886714,0.0031162177,0.0064769383,0.0023601085,0.0012997069],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01588934,0.004737316,0.002095657,0.004388949,0.005968002,0.0029340996,0.0022445687,0.0052356804,0.0016511554],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0029219612,0.0022850616,0.019652223,0.0022118639,0.0015042822,0.006741835,0.038150568,0.00062270847,0.00878277,0.7625486,0.15250525,0.0020728493],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0037013304,0.00093538093,0.0108594205,0.0030721128,0.0036335085,0.002872817,0.0023840822,0.00090824993,0.0009051852,0.0045451475,0.9615164,0.004666372],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019548101,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00828416,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.80901116,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.030240497,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017514436,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996132},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1513245694","doi":"10.24201/es.2010v28n83.219","title":"Las acciones de los pueblos autóctonos contra la violencia conyugal y el dispositivo nacional para la equidad de género","year":2010,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Estudios Sociológicos de El Colegio de México","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.019418166710185626,"score_gpt":0.3589977336827369,"score_spread":0.33957956697255126,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1513245694","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9709077,0.0021707197,0.0024519586,0.006288513,0.0011338979,0.0015157325,0.00028248093,0.0003819968,0.014866994],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99137807,0.0018811175,0.000946952,0.0013372725,0.0031598355,0.00076667377,0.000023779674,0.00008801235,0.00041829926],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99100935,0.0028084032,0.0010521453,0.0012678048,0.0013436838,0.0025185994],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99165225,0.005153976,0.0006618728,0.0006160891,0.0009071679,0.0010086276],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["sts","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.004097891,0.0010896983,0.0013654681,0.00027025762,0.0031796005,0.00072513893,0.0015821013,0.0013341077,0.0003164316],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002606688,0.0011594171,0.0007966105,0.0007644949,0.0062303212,0.0006942203,0.0006712404,0.0026632121,0.00030901315],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002610682,0.0010933174,0.3864283,0.000085240885,0.0007291965,0.00034424636,0.015070649,0.00010588646,0.012800932,0.5797337,0.0025349387,0.0008125214],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0035919913,0.00035611665,0.9054298,0.0007858377,0.0007634175,0.00032069103,0.009060204,0.00096876425,0.0022116934,0.019142725,0.055477306,0.0018914894],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006396795,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024671375,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.560591,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019442016,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0067808125,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999624},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1516817049","doi":"10.5944/trc.30.2012.7013","title":"Las claúsulas notwithstanding y override del constitucionalismo canadiense","year":2012,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Teoría y Realidad Constitucional","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Tribunal; Philosophy; Political science; Cartography; Law; Geography","score_opus":0.04512527493505379,"score_gpt":0.3508835650899628,"score_spread":0.305758290154909,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1516817049","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.41640007,0.00991645,0.0019010168,0.011089297,0.009938137,0.0017374707,0.002445569,0.00052990264,0.5460421],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99155444,0.0011463288,0.0008165065,0.0011018488,0.0034011777,0.00009381857,0.00011708537,0.0000495603,0.0017192594],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99218446,0.0007555901,0.001219572,0.0010583455,0.0023413352,0.0024406884],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.994418,0.001834104,0.0006460904,0.00065461546,0.00090762734,0.0015395457],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022516805,0.0009950678,0.0011551508,0.0005624582,0.0032565433,0.00041176524,0.0008903788,0.0005086007,0.0020035172],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015189528,0.0010274845,0.000511359,0.0012964432,0.007474358,0.0014806164,0.0005133132,0.00093865924,0.0015947118],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015924424,0.00031871867,0.11937031,0.000053528453,0.0004192259,0.00007600604,0.0037986822,0.00008785287,0.00027488332,0.8607818,0.014050118,0.00060961687],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001840051,0.00010462868,0.040530715,0.0008510855,0.00052053656,0.00031069486,0.005099789,0.00008650983,0.00032791164,0.0042831777,0.94421047,0.0018344162],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0057427376,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004604459,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93016034,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017471506,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0043550665,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99921757},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1519123424","doi":"10.14198/doxa2008.31.23","title":"Valores y problemas de la democracia constitucional cosmopolita","year":2008,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"DOXA Cuadernos de Filosofía del Derecho","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"WSP (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Humanities","score_opus":0.04282536453676809,"score_gpt":0.3551379383358712,"score_spread":0.3123125737991031,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1519123424","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.629255,0.0075411284,0.0047574136,0.0097628655,0.000980876,0.0015267885,0.0004946025,0.0005383473,0.345143],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98670405,0.004897131,0.003822601,0.0010520774,0.0011906655,0.00018788545,0.000030457853,0.000050088645,0.002065062],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9934764,0.00174768,0.0008459744,0.0009654296,0.0013898616,0.00157469],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9950455,0.0027713715,0.00040853396,0.0004844763,0.00061668403,0.0006734493],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014970191,0.0007135525,0.0008409005,0.00031492312,0.0032309894,0.00031786345,0.0010581062,0.000648086,0.00079274055],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022128816,0.0007542953,0.0004537128,0.0008345634,0.008524787,0.00060660986,0.00039641466,0.0011146703,0.0011501131],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015958442,0.0007860682,0.32653812,0.00014862385,0.00053133257,0.00062928715,0.014906814,0.00032258895,0.00051543216,0.5782137,0.0762717,0.0009767463],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0031967817,0.00033074745,0.26848224,0.0012566954,0.0005297034,0.0014060565,0.0072499965,0.0013045273,0.001672685,0.20764545,0.50411093,0.0028141476],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013282765,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00028922013,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.42783925,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011947936,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0045162784,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996276},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1526401859","doi":"","title":"Derechos humanos y justicia para mujeres indígenas: experiencias desde la sociedad civil","year":2010,"lang":"es","type":"book-chapter","venue":"ITESO Institutional Repository (ReI) (Western Institute of Technology and Higher Education)","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.036940510324175856,"score_gpt":0.34469405299179534,"score_spread":0.3077535426676195,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1526401859","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.37026528,0.013966548,0.00021313244,0.0038161757,0.010944458,0.0015546936,0.0001361682,0.00044764756,0.5986559],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9507982,0.002248035,0.0015251957,0.00030659954,0.0017336906,0.0004369666,0.00007064422,0.000050466744,0.042830203],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99487627,0.00013194991,0.0015432446,0.0014852735,0.0012313322,0.00073192635],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99547124,0.0004135618,0.0013386502,0.00089756673,0.001535956,0.00034303317],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00044303204,0.0010878674,0.001274456,0.0014451295,0.0045153406,0.00028321138,0.0013880446,0.002384929,0.00037787668],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00035785214,0.0011427933,0.00039076517,0.0005951998,0.025809655,0.0012726599,0.00070815906,0.0020313568,0.000159264],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000074751675,0.000592525,0.022234643,0.0002328961,0.0005054824,0.000092607006,0.001636454,0.000014122722,0.0024293738,0.9681086,0.00024618246,0.0038323842],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00056030095,0.00016398168,0.05272319,0.0017597348,0.00057494343,0.0003584281,0.00129702,0.0000010226241,0.00292466,0.03671809,0.9016076,0.0013110312],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00039894826,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00090016046,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93139046,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00055953773,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0067368415,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99910223},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1528465847","doi":"","title":"El concepto de jurisdicción","year":2013,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Aequitas Revue de développement humain handicap et changement social","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy","score_opus":0.061079602041086686,"score_gpt":0.4138905456009712,"score_spread":0.3528109435598845,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1528465847","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.47065425,0.004269812,0.004781323,0.35891724,0.002847181,0.0058439956,0.00035813314,0.00049299496,0.15183507],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98363507,0.004660955,0.0009349795,0.0034707116,0.0036681967,0.0014703211,0.00010724567,0.000059198715,0.001993321],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99336904,0.0012131295,0.00093393796,0.0009467157,0.0014076463,0.002129511],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997582,0.00043181775,0.00066219195,0.00033557802,0.00049660733,0.0004917843],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029443617,0.0007040174,0.00086965703,0.00032907305,0.0032437854,0.00076583517,0.0010414852,0.00037243875,0.00847654],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00036447926,0.0008000616,0.00041820682,0.0007909776,0.0021006237,0.0006131951,0.00086096954,0.0006139872,0.0018335358],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000061909916,0.00071250024,0.022937179,0.00028800825,0.0008776883,0.00004678483,0.13392316,0.000009288692,0.0013398868,0.545631,0.2859749,0.008197722],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004376995,0.0007880498,0.171139,0.0011154722,0.00073917425,0.000009032392,0.06446228,0.00012841751,0.00063911505,0.04737844,0.70670414,0.0025198674],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00112185,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00083040533,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5129808,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029894316,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010878351,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999445},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1528750239","doi":"","title":"El Derecho Romano en la formación del jurista. Criterio defendido por un profesor hispalense en 1880","year":2013,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Aequitas Revue de développement humain handicap et changement social","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0413088802903272,"score_gpt":0.3894568311373717,"score_spread":0.3481479508470445,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1528750239","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.757817,0.004902132,0.004188617,0.16451187,0.0027994525,0.008373289,0.0006918547,0.00055376877,0.056162015],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9828046,0.0058076987,0.002088659,0.001843595,0.0026686776,0.002492399,0.00024605202,0.00009462324,0.001953672],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99095,0.0026717507,0.0013210353,0.001200396,0.0016930706,0.0021637701],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966057,0.0010492943,0.0008687946,0.00044805417,0.00054756063,0.00048057857],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0043271435,0.0009920227,0.0011212461,0.0005127131,0.003466809,0.0008621296,0.00130517,0.00058206945,0.004210309],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00058028515,0.001080933,0.0005351102,0.00079711754,0.0014913966,0.0009745413,0.0013791072,0.00090442953,0.001181828],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026901063,0.0018838993,0.029448854,0.0011156815,0.0022254945,0.00021563836,0.31528565,0.000005957283,0.001774016,0.45646873,0.16827238,0.023034679],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0063445615,0.001038525,0.23644003,0.0014316682,0.0013897083,0.000034748453,0.06713877,0.0001577355,0.00067519426,0.029253418,0.6525183,0.0035773912],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005562065,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010133709,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.48424587,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027578957,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00086898834,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995959},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1534181476","doi":"","title":"Bjarne Melkevik, Philosophie du jugement juridique, Collection Dike, Presses de l'Univ. Laval, Quebec, 2010, 205 pp","year":2012,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Revista europea de historia de las ideas políticas y de las instituciones públicas/Revista europea de historia de las ideas políticas y de las instituciones públicas","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0254900419643649,"score_gpt":0.3037584107317062,"score_spread":0.2782683687673413,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1534181476","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16661459,0.30181798,0.051989045,0.09156456,0.043120462,0.018280422,0.0036829473,0.009683043,0.31324694],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89073926,0.046206117,0.0111787105,0.0051752557,0.029546699,0.0012879891,0.00041322273,0.00131543,0.014137299],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9630152,0.012752581,0.0060734837,0.004689175,0.004196429,0.009273142],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97676665,0.0035944683,0.004229831,0.004958087,0.0035815395,0.0068694437],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.01319071,0.004824256,0.0053201094,0.0030290368,0.007842536,0.0038924508,0.0063683908,0.0025115053,0.0014839404],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02152347,0.0054428726,0.0023868207,0.0068502,0.0064166007,0.003998567,0.0028270388,0.005609657,0.0030004282],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0015449644,0.0027193136,0.011041523,0.0017531839,0.0011793958,0.0019651237,0.007632151,0.0005843034,0.0035716211,0.6557006,0.31168318,0.00062463665],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004550332,0.0007679844,0.008519577,0.0026523161,0.004200787,0.0024752328,0.0007631852,0.0006788193,0.00042282575,0.00492309,0.9648842,0.0051616365],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01974249,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007129426,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.72412467,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03901499,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018313423,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99942887},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1546103916","doi":"10.17058/rdunisc.v0i0.1800","title":"Las condiciones de la ciudadanía","year":2010,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Revista do Direito","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Monsanto (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Physics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.013593839561939115,"score_gpt":0.3842134505029887,"score_spread":0.3706196109410496,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1546103916","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.56876487,0.0075560133,0.000108465596,0.0033378974,0.0009903172,0.0003772902,0.00005022099,0.00012855363,0.41868642],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99346125,0.0028839963,0.00028050307,0.00014504546,0.0012842914,0.000031524338,0.0000030751492,0.000015460608,0.0018948365],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975687,0.0005843328,0.00033822306,0.0004226537,0.00059414434,0.0004918901],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977686,0.0012317426,0.00018823682,0.00033134746,0.000246392,0.00023372854],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014039915,0.0002684723,0.00042453464,0.000098439246,0.001015885,0.0009867133,0.000515022,0.0002030739,0.0007567141],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014777388,0.00025425776,0.00019002926,0.0004783083,0.0034724874,0.00024324545,0.00018958823,0.00055775425,0.000621831],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013398086,0.000096284195,0.061231803,0.000056698027,0.00006298278,0.000030968462,0.001819641,0.0000014552944,0.002445876,0.9241034,0.0059377123,0.0041997735],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020220298,0.000023517348,0.04479523,0.00021066396,0.00007128425,0.0000099970275,0.00090646493,0.000009080086,0.00014913407,0.0029013045,0.95041955,0.00030155378],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003946051,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00011286887,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94448185,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000120764125,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00073742156,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99999094},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1555570896","doi":"","title":"La autonomía universitaria. Discurso ideológico instituido o razón doctrinaria del ser de la universidad","year":2008,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Actualidad Contable FACES","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Political science; Humanities","score_opus":0.0218618622989327,"score_gpt":0.32775664420707773,"score_spread":0.305894781908145,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1555570896","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.722897,0.0016519513,0.0007604013,0.002248052,0.00045525096,0.00043805956,0.00010761659,0.00019394155,0.27124774],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9843666,0.004154417,0.0003606304,0.00021256988,0.00025140893,0.000016455395,0.000014459852,0.00002258385,0.010600888],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99544334,0.0015140085,0.0004459833,0.0007933191,0.0008061759,0.0009971709],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964295,0.0021402359,0.00033693036,0.00035799696,0.00035269957,0.00038265114],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010767612,0.00058669096,0.0007997206,0.00031312418,0.0030695554,0.00043445357,0.0010858808,0.00045751245,0.0007130919],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00047751167,0.00059818354,0.00027740467,0.0009965186,0.004991431,0.001848922,0.00055210583,0.0006779853,0.00044675323],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003035236,0.00064068375,0.17580654,0.00008181719,0.0009584084,0.0009675957,0.08986545,0.0019822845,0.0009878692,0.7024765,0.024084423,0.0018448915],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020603412,0.00015499623,0.09256992,0.00023674569,0.000282588,0.00008929691,0.05336982,0.0001327228,0.00041740385,0.0009386487,0.8487649,0.0009826483],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01068904,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009811259,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.82468045,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012029611,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029902682,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99964696},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1558430372","doi":"","title":"Reflections on the legal Evolution of Free Expression in Canada and Colombia in the Context of Democratic Consolidation","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dialnet (Universidad de la Rioja)","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.035844429650243176,"score_gpt":0.30872560544091304,"score_spread":0.27288117579066984,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1558430372","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93569285,0.000070494985,0.000070031965,0.00066242635,0.000050969214,0.00023401417,0.000011399582,0.0000028959873,0.06320493],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9998058,0.00003955739,0.000049215,0.000052661173,0.0000088779525,0.000011351839,6.509228e-7,0.0000012647873,0.000030635034],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988652,0.00062519783,0.00011229355,0.00008639299,0.00020540408,0.00010549633],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99878305,0.00093495136,0.00009556527,0.00010164189,0.00006607998,0.00001870369],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005094651,0.000050016413,0.00010370615,0.000086236185,0.00022637016,0.000007814196,0.00019490207,0.000034287972,0.00003187897],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00040004274,0.000038387305,0.00001666741,0.00035504796,0.00066772883,0.00013134246,0.0000350961,0.00011346562,4.189487e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000753389,0.000058818303,0.086908676,0.000005211584,0.000010504879,0.000007773573,0.047981713,0.000022240754,0.0012241534,0.86130476,0.002127319,0.0002734648],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00042040675,0.000050409086,0.80257,0.00008160377,0.000013199179,0.000001151478,0.17985737,0.000053372794,0.0007952977,0.01472088,0.0013634802,0.00007283973],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.86635494,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9903028,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8465839,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004127739,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011052173,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24602747},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1563267976","doi":"10.5347/isonomia.v0i13.556","title":"El derecho como técnica social de control y reforma","year":2021,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Isonomía - Revista de teoría y filosofía del derecho","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Derecho; Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03394486707102085,"score_gpt":0.3627048328390092,"score_spread":0.3287599657679883,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1563267976","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.44364494,0.05720697,0.02822333,0.06934049,0.0026269518,0.0037639656,0.0025208993,0.0013565498,0.3913159],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9848493,0.004986965,0.0020918716,0.0033276405,0.0023889188,0.00022635782,0.00006783508,0.00008793782,0.0019731768],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9910228,0.0025127355,0.0015444345,0.0014307917,0.0012721653,0.0022170206],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99439675,0.001712932,0.0008419941,0.0008882686,0.0014196648,0.00074040744],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025935662,0.001006433,0.0017650486,0.00025627486,0.0035402696,0.0015292144,0.0014996579,0.0007942688,0.0014996944],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026934415,0.0010976505,0.0010049513,0.0015028478,0.0025054065,0.0008535245,0.0005987928,0.00153112,0.0011216457],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00059536524,0.0014131402,0.0877315,0.0006844213,0.0019402637,0.0006918507,0.013619258,0.000114987095,0.0017773339,0.7871935,0.074438155,0.029800253],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0035817025,0.00022840269,0.04279221,0.0010662894,0.0009459003,0.00016553701,0.008256784,0.0009816674,0.0005647552,0.014180365,0.9250854,0.002150977],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00083371566,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007321055,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8506473,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002951847,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005713756,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99992293},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1563908492","doi":"","title":"Enfoques sociológicos para el estudio de las Cortes Internacionales","year":2015,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen)","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Centre for International Governance Innovation","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.16291537395750483,"score_gpt":0.4049239019087118,"score_spread":0.24200852795120698,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1563908492","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6115811,0.019722117,0.0011036956,0.0050440608,0.00017435013,0.0010812667,0.0002251132,0.000055106662,0.3610132],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.74410623,0.0035806934,0.0003003458,0.000023267543,0.00008128134,2.9867988e-7,0.0000167147,0.000012445202,0.2518787],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9929146,0.0029159826,0.00030136105,0.00065714214,0.0022557806,0.00095511164],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9939535,0.0019123903,0.0004806908,0.00062073465,0.0024542275,0.0005784352],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0045467718,0.00034988523,0.0008224159,0.0002865738,0.0035457024,0.00008296694,0.0028924101,0.00025749655,0.09081883],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00066793326,0.00038514848,0.00043001003,0.0012112784,0.010612057,0.00089113606,0.002577428,0.00069329195,0.051586304],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012293077,0.00035367106,0.00059966417,0.000105351464,0.00075376284,0.00023819409,0.058448195,0.0001268482,0.00090495683,0.016022727,0.9200684,0.0011489345],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014171374,0.000431998,0.030490845,0.00029717936,0.00020468264,0.0000066895013,0.17161164,0.00016700548,0.00062030717,0.00019286628,0.7942126,0.00034703757],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010102112,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009301864,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13252516,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016874357,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034835767,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99986005},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1566921996","doi":"","title":"El derecho del espacio exterior y el futuro de la humanidad","year":2010,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas)","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"McGill University","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Derecho","score_opus":0.022503651757075246,"score_gpt":0.3119870365520831,"score_spread":0.28948338479500785,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1566921996","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4852368,0.001620796,0.0026580384,0.026247004,0.0046168873,0.0012425708,0.00017866398,0.0007427739,0.47745648],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99009573,0.0011883366,0.0034353146,0.00040611826,0.0036005913,0.00038837927,0.000057205543,0.000088505796,0.0007398219],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9916472,0.0018197652,0.0012328819,0.0015554874,0.001948446,0.0017962472],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9941568,0.0016197076,0.0008206453,0.0010125458,0.001258328,0.0011320069],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.002703927,0.0010515837,0.0010452868,0.0007133121,0.004209913,0.0013623262,0.0018333824,0.0013891666,0.0003098626],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029315948,0.0010798316,0.0006253583,0.0015082347,0.00068837113,0.0011717936,0.0007467747,0.0025212022,0.00015083328],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022471497,0.00095849816,0.006531657,0.00010593844,0.000317502,0.00027326006,0.010625897,0.000028746292,0.014358325,0.9620776,0.0018162724,0.0026815946],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013202414,0.000102356375,0.061170857,0.00029032948,0.00022876685,0.0007501407,0.0029293867,0.0001446914,0.0010146738,0.0036564763,0.92724586,0.0011462392],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000032426906,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024983503,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9584211,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001418303,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0043586586,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99990726},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1569107309","doi":"10.35487/rius.v2i22.2008.144","title":"Los derechos de las minorías en la filosofía política y en el derecho internacional","year":2016,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"REVISTA IUS","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Derecho; Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.021965029332681987,"score_gpt":0.3917464396357335,"score_spread":0.36978141030305156,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1569107309","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.65295136,0.014254412,0.010810426,0.05828083,0.001510254,0.0016843817,0.00087830285,0.0003813189,0.2592487],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9880104,0.003899933,0.0007276079,0.00022887578,0.0009266377,0.0000517051,0.000003613422,0.00002181784,0.006129414],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961749,0.0013402164,0.00048991194,0.0005816276,0.0007315022,0.0006818412],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99523014,0.0036679634,0.00022145231,0.00032962402,0.00026717142,0.0002836409],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011601711,0.0003745248,0.0005179897,0.00013611342,0.0004938318,0.00028739226,0.0008072237,0.0002445327,0.0010061042],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002662875,0.000286124,0.00027858838,0.0003214396,0.0015153643,0.00033463165,0.00036389683,0.00031944967,0.001237469],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000078876816,0.00019842367,0.06913289,0.00011353017,0.00026831162,0.00008453001,0.0034071403,9.523892e-7,0.0013368684,0.89218706,0.0142238885,0.018967548],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006051463,0.00008909685,0.05273158,0.0018611811,0.00014038739,0.0000371613,0.00083949603,0.000012806163,0.00032804356,0.00840357,0.9344045,0.000547023],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00029241134,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00024350989,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9201806,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00088988506,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010160271,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999591},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1570961987","doi":"10.18543/ed-51(1)-2003pp93-110","title":"Penetración de la historicidad en el Derecho Constitucional español","year":2015,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Estudios de Deusto","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Optech (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Derecho; Political science; Humanities; Democracy; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.03409644192211092,"score_gpt":0.39714367939955497,"score_spread":0.36304723747744405,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1570961987","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.581521,0.016401693,0.0046326024,0.008077938,0.0033507312,0.0008562686,0.000069587404,0.00029484511,0.38479534],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9932118,0.0011558416,0.0018757123,0.00037245086,0.0017259881,0.000100408375,0.0000041524745,0.000022234886,0.0015314012],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99555707,0.001500643,0.00042939995,0.00057668844,0.0010896384,0.0008465502],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99651194,0.0018382482,0.00021760137,0.00029035116,0.0005638251,0.0005780226],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028944893,0.00041145456,0.0005491203,0.00019368742,0.0009846014,0.00018876017,0.00070485065,0.00034528517,0.00011676277],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00338523,0.00043891676,0.00020204253,0.00064841844,0.0027318632,0.00032764833,0.00033254037,0.0006464137,0.0006481091],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009974498,0.00041126987,0.2796897,0.000030696563,0.00026796144,0.0002556969,0.027515665,0.0004206379,0.00012991522,0.62664914,0.06273713,0.0017924302],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001159762,0.00015557827,0.15813385,0.00017361772,0.00022188053,0.0001153533,0.012569476,0.000087725224,0.00009248295,0.006636776,0.8199506,0.00070293155],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013447287,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00080155034,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7572134,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035140475,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0048620203,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999821},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1594003324","doi":"","title":"El triomf de la doctrina Sinatra. El dret a decidir al Quebec, Escòcia i Catalunya","year":2014,"lang":"ca","type":"article","venue":"Eines per a l'esquerra nacional","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.015098369129046597,"score_gpt":0.353425073259357,"score_spread":0.3383267041303104,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1594003324","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8173072,0.007199418,0.0021849428,0.032003324,0.003319287,0.0012359285,0.00033299116,0.00037772098,0.13603924],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9911885,0.00037494235,0.00046885607,0.0013492904,0.002701109,0.00011948744,0.00006790559,0.00004384089,0.0036860208],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99294955,0.0016257172,0.0008891446,0.0012098494,0.0019228068,0.0014029525],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9957074,0.0020392463,0.00037962498,0.00052339,0.0007597185,0.0005906296],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025787028,0.000818929,0.00095943763,0.00040591115,0.0020391783,0.00043722388,0.0011442787,0.00048357996,0.003223248],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001383728,0.00081277586,0.00061509165,0.0010603941,0.0042481357,0.0007999607,0.00045945452,0.00095518853,0.0012408183],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000281807,0.0006196569,0.024146367,0.00006992908,0.0003774392,0.00008241902,0.01940006,0.00009458398,0.0015848118,0.86084086,0.084436126,0.008065915],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017261386,0.00018250365,0.1323453,0.00024394173,0.00018036486,0.00009858705,0.0035616094,0.00035332487,0.0002587954,0.012691985,0.8471921,0.001165361],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013810738,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.045278136,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8481489,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013007309,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0039941045,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995368},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1595850880","doi":"10.14198/doxa2007.30.06","title":"La regla hartiana de reconocimiento en el pensamiento garzoniano","year":2007,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"DOXA Cuadernos de Filosofía del Derecho","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Optech (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Humanities","score_opus":0.036818597342257744,"score_gpt":0.38286650482407103,"score_spread":0.3460479074818133,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1595850880","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7293284,0.0043618884,0.009866518,0.008952846,0.0013941223,0.0011665795,0.00016800524,0.00041102484,0.24435063],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9883497,0.0023642452,0.0022621811,0.0013332115,0.0014329118,0.00007769792,0.000019844741,0.00006615542,0.0040940545],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9930964,0.001469233,0.001033123,0.0011478022,0.001189148,0.0020642667],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9945316,0.002934932,0.0004888223,0.000658705,0.000533892,0.00085205486],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0048661414,0.00072336604,0.00079358177,0.00045424228,0.0015067655,0.0005663825,0.0012666248,0.00080248964,0.00083115447],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024020055,0.00080402585,0.00048644308,0.0010616384,0.0020220038,0.0007111115,0.00041580523,0.0011879749,0.0014369228],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000587757,0.0012635575,0.46468136,0.0003682474,0.0010187844,0.001040219,0.084267534,0.00020056813,0.0022346603,0.35441548,0.045919042,0.044002805],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017944006,0.00026417815,0.28624412,0.0011948255,0.00040208412,0.00018981492,0.026030505,0.0006045823,0.003055514,0.021342555,0.6569479,0.001929532],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028098004,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004335088,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.61102885,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022375947,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015398421,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997931},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1595981154","doi":"","title":"El discurso del odio en la jurisprudencia constitucional: análisis comparativo","year":2014,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Revistas PUCP (Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú)","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Art","score_opus":0.0176787994020915,"score_gpt":0.32999144044725903,"score_spread":0.31231264104516754,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1595981154","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.357299,0.01573118,0.012779236,0.021200081,0.0028612954,0.0033985216,0.0014003338,0.0009114411,0.5844189],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98757464,0.0041044517,0.00059249497,0.0003290379,0.0010998906,0.00004553152,0.00013538389,0.00006939893,0.00604915],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9901218,0.003077953,0.0012857261,0.0019172312,0.0021033369,0.0014939992],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9926598,0.0030660832,0.0008695545,0.0012454765,0.0013592944,0.0007997711],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026789976,0.0012007122,0.0018654238,0.00071226497,0.0033113076,0.0010369412,0.0021200608,0.00061919994,0.0007342258],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012897823,0.0012380779,0.0009293439,0.0020582357,0.00582888,0.0011695414,0.0007594914,0.0011429341,0.001981731],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019846807,0.0006155496,0.009443434,0.00020594272,0.000576738,0.000105163424,0.008419666,0.00021956775,0.00066978973,0.9276896,0.04678064,0.005075404],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010458041,0.00015152743,0.022005925,0.0007897572,0.0007468369,0.000036800306,0.010544942,0.0007873598,0.00012824938,0.0013158055,0.9609062,0.0015407851],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001699702,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017293333,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92637384,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014056343,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020853246,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99992484},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1606926249","doi":"","title":"Pluralidad de los Ordenamientos Jurídicos y Sistemas de las Fuentes del Derecho","year":2013,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Aequitas Revue de développement humain handicap et changement social","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Derecho; Political science; Philosophy; Humanities","score_opus":0.06285009741983263,"score_gpt":0.40400869454624483,"score_spread":0.34115859712641217,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1606926249","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6971038,0.006834574,0.012857802,0.21378626,0.0021478306,0.008407967,0.0005902003,0.0006384217,0.05763315],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9832838,0.003772467,0.0021640586,0.0030872987,0.0023914922,0.0022340883,0.00017646477,0.00008289476,0.0028073885],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9917491,0.0016486913,0.0011734498,0.0011093377,0.0016516806,0.0026677276],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968127,0.00063051103,0.0008679225,0.00041126355,0.00064258114,0.00063499593],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035819893,0.00088654255,0.0010339789,0.0004739293,0.0034841623,0.0011057991,0.0012645342,0.00045370223,0.0039286744],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007270201,0.000981365,0.0005385373,0.0009911221,0.0016463794,0.00066288747,0.00094878575,0.00070626085,0.00082459184],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016245109,0.0018333455,0.094212696,0.0014126829,0.002146682,0.0001340742,0.12820205,0.000049903865,0.0037388385,0.49235675,0.2682731,0.0074774455],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.010214071,0.0017250096,0.23941326,0.0055148485,0.0026869902,0.000052550135,0.13267398,0.0010805315,0.0024760407,0.07736043,0.52061754,0.006184767],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014028273,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029190294,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.41499633,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005081105,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013536677,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999534},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1607766645","doi":"","title":"La interpretación actual de las enmiendas de la Constitución de los Estados Unidos","year":2013,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Aequitas Revue de développement humain handicap et changement social","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03713493261888747,"score_gpt":0.41071159969371246,"score_spread":0.373576667074825,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1607766645","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6890187,0.0026700762,0.024555244,0.07474427,0.0013439686,0.0046824794,0.00066303654,0.0005285209,0.20179367],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.989531,0.0029499964,0.0017746455,0.0022519638,0.0015430873,0.0010998729,0.00007591305,0.000062360385,0.0007111953],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99139947,0.003576276,0.00085712183,0.0008933062,0.0010931849,0.0021806285],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99636173,0.0017849071,0.00060569186,0.00033166798,0.00032837217,0.0005876465],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.005676391,0.0007650902,0.0008881756,0.00041774544,0.002358963,0.00094212976,0.0011259477,0.0006003231,0.0035543663],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001116721,0.00086846965,0.00041676936,0.0006740306,0.00499898,0.00057826453,0.0009336984,0.0010204122,0.00041959257],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013500155,0.0009520831,0.032608166,0.0004514859,0.0012541116,0.00021645901,0.21290535,0.000028580625,0.0020466524,0.65510195,0.08643814,0.007862004],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006799406,0.0010951598,0.09366676,0.0035286453,0.0018781811,0.000121650584,0.16240737,0.0006282357,0.00184877,0.06243084,0.66183954,0.0037554468],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00097184343,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011089495,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.59267116,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00432558,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025799281,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99949664},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1608151209","doi":"","title":"Fundamentación moral del Ethos. Hacia una rehabilitación del Derecho como disciplina filosófica","year":2013,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Aequitas Revue de développement humain handicap et changement social","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Humanities","score_opus":0.08526421920784988,"score_gpt":0.4169471252986571,"score_spread":0.3316829060908072,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1608151209","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6945117,0.003069705,0.0025967034,0.25509408,0.0023719096,0.0069977622,0.0007887647,0.00047201305,0.03409732],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98533857,0.0028400775,0.002766348,0.0020290033,0.002420658,0.0023631342,0.000327789,0.00010125732,0.0018131894],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98995686,0.0018162546,0.0016493669,0.0016837317,0.002234002,0.0026597937],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99601156,0.00084547023,0.0010375472,0.000662961,0.00076169375,0.0006807814],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.003733225,0.0011840251,0.0014237933,0.000540635,0.0054874723,0.0011294807,0.001557934,0.00055871526,0.006037468],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00058130326,0.001295258,0.00072403235,0.0013008087,0.0031665666,0.001061732,0.0019258356,0.0010237051,0.001586824],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002330777,0.0022898281,0.107256345,0.00097633846,0.001636405,0.00006668986,0.1403565,0.000028706867,0.0013577925,0.5237589,0.21082607,0.01121334],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008478326,0.0024567433,0.5210495,0.0036161693,0.0015433292,0.000014650097,0.14812323,0.0005116603,0.0006271209,0.12299134,0.18476403,0.005823879],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013629155,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016138373,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.41379318,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0040838206,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00089188863,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99990743},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1625510545","doi":"","title":"Las Reparaciones en la Jurisprudencia de la Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos (Remedies Under the Jurisprudence of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights)","year":2011,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Political science; Human rights; Humanities; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.017001522198187544,"score_gpt":0.34480880470531894,"score_spread":0.32780728250713137,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1625510545","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9801299,0.0027690446,0.004279792,0.0020452214,0.00030243152,0.0003594108,0.000009348694,0.000029258828,0.010075611],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99256927,0.006337261,0.00020447558,0.00009153301,0.00029965516,0.000024752957,4.3416026e-7,0.000022825434,0.0004498244],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99243635,0.0035471246,0.0009183063,0.00038087435,0.00095679885,0.0017605454],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9956227,0.0016881331,0.0015577422,0.00047367427,0.0005238414,0.0001339373],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0059386343,0.0004061105,0.00070643093,0.0001906926,0.0020727515,0.000098972836,0.0021520113,0.000156202,0.00007220036],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004708615,0.0002599362,0.0005004617,0.0007634489,0.011814663,0.0002833475,0.00040463792,0.0027086744,0.000008933947],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015115787,0.0004388949,0.07558157,0.000029781404,0.0012174704,0.000009825892,0.05849129,0.000016754568,0.0033317658,0.8584052,0.0003754712,0.0019508668],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007681836,0.0013102468,0.25669026,0.0009879216,0.0008477112,0.00038892005,0.122453175,0.00003171222,0.0072611165,0.5965498,0.0120126065,0.0006983699],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013930533,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.035922345,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26185536,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001623581,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0054677525,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999853},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1695186912","doi":"10.12660/rda.v228.2002.46520","title":"Desvio de poder por atos administrativos, legislativos e jurisdicionais","year":2002,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Revista de Direito Administrativo","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Adidas (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Power (physics); Humanities; Art; Physics","score_opus":0.05218088684472881,"score_gpt":0.35895385924150836,"score_spread":0.30677297239677953,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1695186912","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25234967,0.034284007,0.002100415,0.022668026,0.0008063427,0.0026285206,0.00076747016,0.0005923377,0.6838032],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97698593,0.007462298,0.0014571105,0.00058458745,0.0016026673,0.00023550953,0.000029386045,0.00007417313,0.011568366],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9920989,0.0015465344,0.0014242593,0.0013845889,0.0016229678,0.001922742],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9952771,0.0013517548,0.0008147887,0.0008968182,0.0005806794,0.0010788587],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014422709,0.0010858676,0.0013284255,0.00024313421,0.0022779244,0.0014297367,0.0012319835,0.00052927574,0.0034946832],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014845596,0.0011319909,0.00067563663,0.0012909662,0.0037131333,0.00085907226,0.00024025464,0.0009746048,0.0010525649],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016646554,0.0016394814,0.053218797,0.00038130055,0.00065038144,0.00083278393,0.013743098,0.000009972836,0.0009129575,0.86394954,0.058726206,0.005769035],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010803965,0.0007433009,0.020001207,0.0011892783,0.00045673182,0.00018546064,0.004490847,0.00047803464,0.0008204444,0.0015706857,0.96723896,0.0017446422],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00029507835,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00030461646,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9085128,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010591338,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030479322,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997252},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1713673456","doi":"10.30827/acfs.v45i0.531","title":"BIENES CONSTITUCIONALES: EL OBJETIVO DE LA TEORÍA CONSTITUCIONAL","year":2011,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Anales de la Cátedra Francisco Suárez","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.02553223115709057,"score_gpt":0.3491885178630568,"score_spread":0.32365628670596625,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1713673456","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.45059302,0.016787868,0.00514125,0.0014539744,0.0009570982,0.00063625886,0.00039725224,0.0003005714,0.5237327],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9896531,0.006107758,0.0019148171,0.0007759372,0.0007371203,0.00010716453,0.000021028407,0.000039241517,0.00064385164],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9934052,0.002376401,0.0008137548,0.00095931767,0.0011586756,0.0012866382],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99373204,0.004087062,0.0004091498,0.00051496614,0.0006782168,0.0005785885],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028111606,0.00073359115,0.0008866695,0.00043563335,0.0018495113,0.00038139487,0.001130039,0.00065928226,0.0014709235],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00214371,0.0007424964,0.00044519274,0.0011393244,0.018752933,0.0007482423,0.0003528254,0.0009524488,0.00068636413],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001394605,0.00048374126,0.28417495,0.00006810864,0.0003869445,0.0004119577,0.0135470005,0.000052060863,0.00062050414,0.6959443,0.0032485456,0.000922432],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017581265,0.00019167172,0.42113578,0.00097503705,0.00046403238,0.00036248285,0.010122286,0.00014892942,0.001097057,0.044689722,0.5175689,0.0014859792],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001895311,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013603502,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6512546,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00055641425,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0040633,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995026},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1717885948","doi":"","title":"CONGRESO INTERNACIONAL SOBRE DERECHO DE FAMILIA, EN JURÍDICAS","year":2005,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Gaceta UNAM (2000-2009)","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Derecho; Political science; Cartography; Geography; Philosophy","score_opus":0.021856253346203638,"score_gpt":0.33982203156014773,"score_spread":0.3179657782139441,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1717885948","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5586305,0.02256227,0.0018875628,0.039551906,0.0034072977,0.0014596562,0.0006943558,0.00051689765,0.37128952],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9646153,0.0052200975,0.0012723252,0.0014852936,0.0028143565,0.00007244284,0.000022000755,0.000038855553,0.024459327],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99443436,0.0008341583,0.0008392377,0.00099491,0.0014385405,0.0014587879],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99719304,0.0008223261,0.0003647315,0.0005260131,0.00054258236,0.00055130385],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014383047,0.0006733854,0.0008084499,0.0003038902,0.0013269485,0.00041134463,0.0013038173,0.00043241298,0.0020760808],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000915153,0.0006795152,0.00041696182,0.0008146784,0.0026336687,0.00073102175,0.0005125288,0.00089284586,0.0041688],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00060138205,0.0016360139,0.12692723,0.00018508916,0.0017368083,0.00032689123,0.08698752,0.00094619143,0.00191261,0.30421504,0.26450625,0.21001899],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00106432,0.00013152004,0.055448133,0.00035924694,0.00017199213,0.000040854902,0.004591787,0.0006285646,0.0003849083,0.0019815615,0.93435395,0.0008431574],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014544704,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0046519353,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6698477,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020495353,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003622823,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999732},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W172220534","doi":"","title":"Lotta al terrorismo: da Bush a Obama, passando per la Corte Suprema","year":2011,"lang":"it","type":"article","venue":"Quaderni costituzionali","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Centre for International Governance Innovation","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Separation of powers; Political science; Law; Deference; Abandonment (legal); Constitution; Judicial review; Judicial deference; Justiciability; Terrorism; Politics","score_opus":0.11252686597443745,"score_gpt":0.3529861975164348,"score_spread":0.24045933154199733,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W172220534","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19038746,0.0071168416,0.004394327,0.020729786,0.007139071,0.002092428,0.0007167106,0.0005053958,0.766918],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98227555,0.0009754473,0.0006405028,0.0015377465,0.0009193171,0.00013157401,0.0000473672,0.000044987322,0.013427495],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9937205,0.0010879404,0.0008235293,0.0012334475,0.0019550454,0.001179562],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99645036,0.0010993426,0.00046171286,0.0006030497,0.0008328139,0.0005527273],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013854445,0.0007471698,0.00087105925,0.00022988416,0.0018230443,0.00030653045,0.0011718571,0.00038643344,0.013292731],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007956965,0.00074074155,0.00047820157,0.00064848224,0.0051214835,0.0008017803,0.0004960524,0.0008417876,0.0056817443],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00041390388,0.0012258869,0.109887555,0.00007295815,0.0009444621,0.0003738639,0.05092014,0.000024150047,0.00026733702,0.6631931,0.16992027,0.0027563656],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010937757,0.00015658053,0.10313349,0.0003534286,0.00025504295,0.00005187547,0.009778701,0.0000755649,0.00008628688,0.0037187932,0.88024014,0.0010563193],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004279927,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020992125,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7918881,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00046816005,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015699434,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995044},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W17661580","doi":"","title":"El Homenaje al jurista, profesor universitario y ciudadano de la República de las Letras y de las Ciencias Sociales Alfredo Rodríguez García, con el añadido de las particulares consideraciones y reflexiones de Guillermina Martín Reyes, Antonio García Lizana, María Encarnación Gómez Rojo y Stamatios Tzitzis","year":2012,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Revista europea de historia de las ideas políticas y de las instituciones públicas/Revista europea de historia de las ideas políticas y de las instituciones públicas","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Derecho; Garcia; Art; Philosophy","score_opus":0.032293080372353365,"score_gpt":0.3513416217942435,"score_spread":0.31904854142189015,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W17661580","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6783568,0.123465694,0.021729983,0.038996823,0.011366897,0.011361399,0.004133315,0.005732185,0.10485686],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9394612,0.015215057,0.019960899,0.0061587747,0.010118704,0.0009531253,0.00040081766,0.0011714939,0.0065599736],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9529987,0.01981239,0.0062406952,0.005182421,0.004396725,0.011369063],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97120124,0.0074255033,0.004766933,0.0050797164,0.0038199811,0.0077066226],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.019615605,0.005053851,0.0057623945,0.0035170617,0.009457634,0.0038297744,0.0066351295,0.003173254,0.00087585644],"category_scores_gemma":[0.032711532,0.005826784,0.0026373605,0.0061935214,0.011404058,0.0037924296,0.0028555214,0.006437144,0.001281457],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0023695298,0.0029095649,0.044002578,0.00205506,0.0018039754,0.0070736934,0.027457215,0.00080236816,0.0064950483,0.7298855,0.1741829,0.0009625234],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005280561,0.00087660976,0.019802151,0.002901083,0.004080595,0.005406264,0.0034654585,0.0011472274,0.0007502905,0.009254858,0.9413088,0.00572608],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009142277,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0059104874,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7671259,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.047315538,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.029946428,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99949616},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W179432892","doi":"","title":"El caso Tony Judt: una carta abierta a la Liga Antidifamación","year":2008,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Repository of Digital Objects for Teaching Research and Culture (University of Valencia)","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of California, San Diego; York University; Bard College; Georgetown University; London School of Economics and Political Science; Queen Mary University of London; Bilkent Üniversitesi; Princeton University","keywords":"Humanities; Art","score_opus":0.04823303009219563,"score_gpt":0.36069812757627145,"score_spread":0.3124650974840758,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W179432892","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.879025,0.0020744165,0.00006488061,0.00037070634,0.00010643544,0.00048235463,0.0001253701,0.000030039335,0.117720835],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98776597,0.0012378014,0.0001880786,0.0000029091452,0.00015627439,0.0000012540631,0.00000877444,0.0000092156215,0.010629721],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971924,0.0003547211,0.0002409962,0.00051378954,0.0011795502,0.0005185449],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973778,0.00085627654,0.00024194054,0.00023960632,0.0010237118,0.00026063295],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00083254394,0.00022515458,0.00052069454,0.0002316392,0.0037887692,0.00011360015,0.0005473865,0.00021239508,0.000003534869],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007242923,0.00023806491,0.00028250637,0.00040026897,0.006258129,0.0010020506,0.00033106213,0.00058773614,0.0000045756337],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0015399009,0.0029608917,0.22472021,0.0026944024,0.0015994571,0.0007695916,0.5761568,0.000022063152,0.03595349,0.12641157,0.020442095,0.006729513],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006330191,0.008656264,0.21047606,0.0067800917,0.000571447,0.00048312874,0.5830831,0.00023684664,0.009210717,0.014774425,0.15689757,0.0025001625],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001278755,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00020073254,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13645548,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016360127,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000764245,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99750817},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1872321450","doi":"","title":"Universidad, libertad académica y autonomía universitaria","year":2008,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Actualidad Contable FACES","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mica; Geology","score_opus":0.037321894831010005,"score_gpt":0.31500744549756404,"score_spread":0.27768555066655404,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1872321450","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6827496,0.0025560122,0.00014099441,0.006075789,0.0009514311,0.0005240472,0.00011091987,0.00021776042,0.30667344],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95464855,0.005140072,0.00018771838,0.0003100351,0.0003087084,0.000009309482,0.000017599785,0.000019537083,0.03935844],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966166,0.00040442598,0.00042138546,0.0007728512,0.0008560808,0.0009286257],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99764436,0.0008603812,0.00032113047,0.00040668368,0.00043070957,0.0003367273],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00031920744,0.0005057933,0.00073211687,0.00026039255,0.0033553045,0.00024080447,0.0010519546,0.0003009917,0.0018922247],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022346893,0.0005413303,0.0002601564,0.00095704856,0.002854888,0.0016378321,0.00046389384,0.0004601611,0.0017323123],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00038110488,0.00055586913,0.07765022,0.00006568911,0.0015289234,0.000478314,0.12568535,0.00028158023,0.001121814,0.69463664,0.0946697,0.0029447982],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010280019,0.00016390724,0.021951735,0.00013154221,0.00017113471,0.000015137268,0.03710362,0.000056586498,0.0005381582,0.00043507802,0.9376446,0.0007605059],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0067671556,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010019332,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8429749,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006997473,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018700492,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998588},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1904969989","doi":"","title":"La regulación de la competición electoral en Canadá: un modelo igualitario","year":2013,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Revista de Estudios Políticos","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.012868021426429855,"score_gpt":0.3392151356405808,"score_spread":0.32634711421415097,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1904969989","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9597264,0.008955696,0.0016399748,0.007782258,0.0002070124,0.0011902906,0.00005310822,0.0001657771,0.020279499],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9951765,0.0017377422,0.0012097824,0.00041885788,0.0005463001,0.00018145476,0.0000060681364,0.000040895142,0.0006824144],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9926978,0.003861209,0.00065619656,0.00065821514,0.00088730303,0.0012392792],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9957481,0.002544512,0.00027015613,0.00048043905,0.000439223,0.00051757647],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002310672,0.00055127597,0.00087936874,0.00016265518,0.0011852134,0.0008052434,0.00084185763,0.0003276837,0.00042095405],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014757864,0.00055230694,0.00028747728,0.00072285446,0.002725139,0.00035775307,0.00035292262,0.00076225883,0.00042795407],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021976437,0.00029327688,0.07266461,0.00013591687,0.00041843503,0.000090213405,0.011293547,0.00012008697,0.00045505026,0.90377814,0.006538031,0.004190719],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017084348,0.000301843,0.5199769,0.001416977,0.0008620645,0.00018081418,0.013092698,0.0026216991,0.0002428933,0.015621702,0.44182497,0.0021489626],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02780916,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029108573,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8881564,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002013215,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002899585,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99998885},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1919089751","doi":"10.15210/interfaces.v7i1.6946","title":"DIREITO CANADENSE: ALGUMAS PARTICULARIDADES.","year":2012,"lang":"pt","type":"article","venue":"LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas)","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Population; Humanities; Law and economics; Law; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04563948030960855,"score_gpt":0.3032451758728577,"score_spread":0.25760569556324914,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1919089751","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11270544,0.020229321,0.0042503807,0.13738592,0.01311931,0.0026894012,0.00035675569,0.0011336074,0.7081299],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9909872,0.0006084046,0.0005258558,0.00045872084,0.0033516109,0.00033333074,0.00007856415,0.00006847217,0.00358785],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9913429,0.0015461233,0.0012478448,0.0011064789,0.0022582177,0.002498409],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.994832,0.0007884128,0.0006899374,0.00081403035,0.0010301196,0.001845504],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021265114,0.0009228727,0.000986876,0.0005217247,0.0035395005,0.00050013105,0.0011762881,0.0008391098,0.000374881],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001978684,0.00094868266,0.0005415458,0.0017218211,0.0002835323,0.0014922273,0.0006126314,0.0012145372,0.00025721476],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012534492,0.0008340769,0.0073527005,0.00008390498,0.0004791738,0.0001448556,0.021063862,0.000045764016,0.0005173106,0.9539712,0.014643318,0.0007384928],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00080243894,0.00005854666,0.028417628,0.00025362094,0.00030726354,0.0004008171,0.0063733403,0.00011536966,0.00044462085,0.0002858413,0.9614912,0.0010492837],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000056527195,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0041791443,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95368534,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027407336,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027307014,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99929637},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1927495398","doi":"10.22201/iij.24487872e.2013.13.433","title":"Un llamado para repensar las fuentes de derecho Internacional: soft law y la otra cara de la moneda","year":2013,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Anuario Mexicano de Derecho Internacional","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Victoria University; Victoria University of Wellington; McGill University","keywords":"Humanities; Derecho; Philosophy; Cartography; Art; Geography","score_opus":0.019248405090907098,"score_gpt":0.339160907026004,"score_spread":0.3199125019350969,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1927495398","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.86528456,0.0019391911,0.004923243,0.014293861,0.0010006825,0.000796274,0.00020031034,0.00028933957,0.11127252],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98761314,0.0019299642,0.0040133772,0.0027601558,0.0009960248,0.00033406608,0.000027659496,0.00007813286,0.0022474735],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9924484,0.0020315978,0.0010837452,0.0012619265,0.0014568324,0.0017175217],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99373657,0.0032390624,0.0006835562,0.0007460822,0.0007763596,0.0008183715],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022109193,0.0009324047,0.00096915755,0.0002605883,0.0017857327,0.0017170013,0.00222842,0.00078497967,0.0017475197],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013901119,0.0009567011,0.00073615205,0.00038107,0.005227728,0.0010543547,0.0009453093,0.001746018,0.0010412246],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022188034,0.0007013987,0.23107137,0.00006910694,0.0011134454,0.00035530195,0.0070603266,0.000097863616,0.0022331516,0.7397964,0.011017663,0.0062620672],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0027471553,0.00035345898,0.46611384,0.0017350941,0.00050577644,0.00081809517,0.0068561556,0.0018240764,0.010327194,0.17936186,0.32680386,0.00255344],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.042835064,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0050457525,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5604346,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016871919,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018116747,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997366},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1929798149","doi":"10.5944/trc.24.2009.6879","title":"Diseño constitucional e implementación de la Federación canadiense: de Macdonald a Harper","year":2009,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Teoría y Realidad Constitucional","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Art","score_opus":0.017819157338976828,"score_gpt":0.3735978720808749,"score_spread":0.3557787147418981,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1929798149","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.41596776,0.0038950462,0.00338632,0.05515509,0.001602683,0.0017979448,0.0025885724,0.0005581169,0.51504844],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99057084,0.0011482005,0.0018280281,0.0035638388,0.001455304,0.000113245274,0.0001360986,0.000029911833,0.0011545485],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99264145,0.0013564355,0.0010321621,0.0012077632,0.0016930469,0.0020691694],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953155,0.0019573132,0.00044271347,0.00050775235,0.00059949735,0.0011772079],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026157587,0.00089046534,0.00095508475,0.00041386177,0.0034363882,0.00083890796,0.0010151796,0.00048407062,0.0026179883],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010728058,0.00095110235,0.0005271518,0.0008482092,0.0066390475,0.0006228573,0.0002586248,0.0010326265,0.00035636206],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002464957,0.0004753386,0.041000873,0.00003429128,0.00032680156,0.0004389665,0.0028025124,0.00014544128,0.0011174302,0.9183927,0.0313211,0.0036980275],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002530063,0.00026374022,0.12379824,0.00058615056,0.00034749086,0.00078292185,0.0033844935,0.00022881881,0.0002809314,0.03973732,0.8264554,0.0016044185],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0047436026,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005430667,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8786554,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022120867,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011080783,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992939},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1955731170","doi":"10.14201/alh.2702","title":"¿Juicio político o golpe legislativo? Sobre las crisis constitucionales en los años noventa","year":2009,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"AMÉRICA LATINA HOY","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Presidential system; Politics; Demise; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.02567557322084683,"score_gpt":0.36149756376512665,"score_spread":0.3358219905442798,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1955731170","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.054226633,0.0020935705,0.0008980875,0.07098699,0.0012994985,0.0014027369,0.00037292918,0.00036567546,0.8683539],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9896369,0.0048156157,0.0010015843,0.0013847898,0.001093067,0.000035166286,0.000024018245,0.000021688316,0.001987186],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99518645,0.0005727158,0.0008422165,0.0009617221,0.0014343674,0.0010025459],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99683845,0.0012602236,0.0004905463,0.0005201008,0.00054790266,0.0003427619],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006486686,0.0006553503,0.00091408595,0.00027482267,0.0016760876,0.00032464936,0.0008699854,0.00028663158,0.00035060022],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008264755,0.0006356248,0.00040679524,0.0012642859,0.001957116,0.0007815927,0.0002902438,0.0005863334,0.0011614758],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010912843,0.0007866525,0.016121853,0.000042550895,0.0003306064,0.000110940906,0.010192643,0.00015423997,0.0004125854,0.8830212,0.07161759,0.017100062],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016241722,0.0006674831,0.19802746,0.0006923727,0.00040997658,0.00004004814,0.017188687,0.00019502178,0.0004108975,0.022591684,0.7564529,0.0016992961],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00075036887,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012787384,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93541026,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000451536,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00094813266,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996236},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2007929062","doi":"10.1177/000842980103000331","title":"Comptes rendus / Reviews of books: Ley natural y razón práctica: Una visión tomista de la autonomia moral","year":2001,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Studies in Religion/Sciences Religieuses","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Natural (archaeology); Humanities; Geography","score_opus":0.09888371375417401,"score_gpt":0.4686996820655726,"score_spread":0.3698159683113986,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2007929062","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3207528,0.58118653,0.00003517163,0.0040367707,0.0019921798,0.0014166674,0.000027403941,0.00015376975,0.090398714],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.55154455,0.44639084,0.0011065695,0.0002179057,0.0002588195,0.00010683954,0.0000014176053,0.000014131262,0.00035893157],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9922748,0.001814417,0.0018870274,0.001283135,0.0013824248,0.0013581926],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9930088,0.0044374806,0.0011007363,0.00060668983,0.0006370154,0.0002092888],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0046807015,0.00078693486,0.0019239835,0.00061251933,0.0018292051,0.0002944009,0.0017876684,0.00026620852,0.000068801215],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0067602787,0.00066216686,0.0004757937,0.0028639066,0.021721352,0.0007144559,0.0010620886,0.0007585977,0.000119370095],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00031634586,0.0007506117,0.35352653,0.0008070074,0.00049806805,0.00019093032,0.016045036,0.0008622113,0.00051942776,0.25193167,0.37302178,0.0015303697],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002522851,0.00113613,0.04807765,0.01001802,0.0004630155,0.00013007586,0.046499155,0.00047612778,0.0007236107,0.030685328,0.85669976,0.0025682754],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0054309294,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012458042,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.48367795,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009872193,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024526895,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99958295},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W20090033","doi":"10.7589/0090-3558-46.1.195","title":"Argentina: La Juridicidad en la Sociedad de la Información ¿Qué pasa cuando el Legislador se abstiene?","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"AR: Revista de Derecho Informático","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.012920764974721053,"score_gpt":0.34981709368029756,"score_spread":0.3368963287055765,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W20090033","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.28204703,0.0014511857,0.0025696969,0.0007618948,0.00014228141,0.0005038315,0.000044437882,0.00027126446,0.7122084],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9920587,0.0015019536,0.0016093041,0.0005107456,0.00044201838,0.00011135214,0.000021296486,0.000020739843,0.003723872],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969213,0.0005299252,0.00066910515,0.00029690223,0.0007012691,0.00088148535],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969008,0.0020326395,0.0002955172,0.00026244565,0.0002791384,0.00022946949],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029365586,0.00034688826,0.00044498596,0.00017293509,0.0010815021,0.0007273061,0.00061597425,0.00029522285,0.0002915545],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015318465,0.000335927,0.00027606852,0.00055004563,0.0016882817,0.0009003377,0.00021836229,0.0005695229,0.00038796125],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000045196368,0.00013027785,0.06368078,0.0000852353,0.00011137544,0.00006137629,0.010811786,0.00009764497,0.00014247595,0.86047745,0.05641828,0.007938121],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006455437,0.000021559017,0.033615183,0.00012291319,0.00007282499,0.000046808844,0.002251108,0.000085219726,0.00018765037,0.0046024118,0.95792866,0.0004201358],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002147338,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005534284,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90151036,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006480005,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001974771,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999093},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2018717224","doi":"10.1093/publius/pjt017","title":"Metropolitan Governance in the Federalist Americas: Strategies for Equitable and Integrated Development, edited by Peter K. Spink, Peter M. Ward, and Robert H. Wilson.","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publius The Journal of Federalism","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Federalist; Metropolitan area; Federalism; Decentralization; Public administration; Corporate governance; Political science; Government (linguistics); Autonomy; Democratization; State (computer science); Multi-level governance; Democracy; Geography; Politics; Economics; Law; Management","score_opus":0.029379516194055866,"score_gpt":0.3199699283303993,"score_spread":0.2905904121363434,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2018717224","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8731789,0.011012944,0.003570796,0.08670672,0.00075554155,0.0012483353,0.000037110236,0.000027520344,0.023462161],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99568856,0.0009320958,0.0010036693,0.001353332,0.00022991025,0.000038465387,0.0000028667307,0.0000079665915,0.000743129],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997968,0.00038845185,0.00045860768,0.00015488127,0.0005224905,0.0005075751],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99816245,0.0007017682,0.00038154918,0.00009662873,0.00055848295,0.00009915081],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018845536,0.00019000778,0.00031472664,0.0000738094,0.0013705688,0.0014197004,0.00045280322,0.000047243455,0.000043770633],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005193079,0.00010396307,0.00005767746,0.00028877938,0.0009200298,0.001687913,0.0001037762,0.0002999941,0.0000027889273],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002072401,0.00022540854,0.009112342,0.000055163317,0.00039726045,0.000011712829,0.06452664,0.0000141717655,0.0008533647,0.19025566,0.72740203,0.006938987],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010790356,0.00020755916,0.06045774,0.00014526861,0.00005782569,0.00007743773,0.09782345,0.00005815897,0.000060971215,0.012552815,0.8270922,0.00038758028],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0069871694,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006134091,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17770284,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00028399317,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00042570042,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999295},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2024224753","doi":"10.24908/eoe-ese-rse.v5i0.644","title":"Medir progresos en educación en derechos humanos: Una experiencia interamericana en marcha","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Encounters in Theory and History of Education","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Human rights education; Political science; Curriculum; Economic Justice; Public administration; Library science; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.019630423367768005,"score_gpt":0.35819503088445753,"score_spread":0.33856460751668954,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2024224753","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91978145,0.007712891,0.00016945774,0.0007741371,0.002086855,0.0003649693,0.0000026340215,0.000028728371,0.0690789],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9950444,0.00062610535,0.00032242425,0.00015438144,0.0002502879,0.00012777843,0.0000031409518,0.0000054264287,0.003466029],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982988,0.00082105154,0.00023387457,0.00022873787,0.00024758757,0.00016994725],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99886835,0.00072077033,0.000120943034,0.00011874055,0.00010542284,0.00006579736],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010136459,0.00011412932,0.00018575127,0.00022835372,0.00023809014,0.0000063739285,0.00023713202,0.000057847217,0.00037642018],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007679588,0.00012055451,0.000040511608,0.00013826942,0.0024657955,0.00028550657,0.000046222038,0.00016207717,0.000008094385],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007219138,0.00022347171,0.008386482,0.000022221368,0.000018705916,0.000002510823,0.8197236,0.0000011506049,0.00022196103,0.15415911,0.007582915,0.0095856385],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021390105,0.00012670105,0.030253023,0.0003345567,0.000018552182,0.000012329554,0.4318093,0.0000033088656,0.00010491183,0.013052609,0.5237467,0.00032409595],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010089971,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00095585256,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5161638,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012910827,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019794132,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9085326},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2025504431","doi":"10.5216/sec.v16i2.32185","title":"Fronteras y horizontes que nos dan que pensar en los tiempos de la educación en derechos humanos","year":2014,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Sociedade e Cultura","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Quest University Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.016222411251334768,"score_gpt":0.35447312764164607,"score_spread":0.3382507163903113,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2025504431","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7884552,0.0025758534,0.0009806758,0.014487549,0.0020487134,0.0014802655,0.00011822982,0.00035471612,0.1894988],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9889021,0.0013456243,0.0008351092,0.0006032609,0.003268677,0.00016264434,0.000024366656,0.000037234804,0.0048209946],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99379694,0.002846465,0.0006153964,0.0008634961,0.0009037811,0.00097391603],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959399,0.0024971878,0.00035291121,0.00038759955,0.00048083914,0.0003415792],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001682374,0.0006416765,0.00077298173,0.000097190445,0.0020683967,0.00077630143,0.0011095399,0.000590304,0.00029525888],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021808753,0.00057098066,0.00049986836,0.0004285607,0.0027940753,0.0006450827,0.00035089275,0.0010711486,0.00049572525],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000047294143,0.0005110053,0.05134575,0.00015689932,0.00058768323,0.000018823028,0.18008237,0.000032079763,0.01232834,0.67287505,0.07922336,0.0027913875],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011651563,0.00026186788,0.100267746,0.00077294983,0.00030224808,0.000018163586,0.10483909,0.00008862368,0.0024095068,0.006947176,0.7814871,0.0014403795],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022083877,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001303268,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7022637,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001092081,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011011657,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999198},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2052861333","doi":"10.4067/s0718-09502008000200006","title":"CONTRADICCIONES DE LOS FUNDAMENTOS TEÓRICOS DE LA CONSTITUCIÓN CHILENA CON EL ESTADO CONSTITUCIONAL: NOTAS PARA SU REINTERPRETACIÓN","year":2008,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Revista de derecho","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Optech (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03338402854603395,"score_gpt":0.36972348405509853,"score_spread":0.3363394555090646,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2052861333","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.77817845,0.045452226,0.0258483,0.0068432423,0.00089786184,0.0030090548,0.00097285095,0.0006325247,0.13816549],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.977167,0.019293377,0.0011149887,0.0010907145,0.00065685704,0.00017182663,0.000029290592,0.00004439918,0.00043155107],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99317116,0.002274401,0.0010311931,0.0009938806,0.0010424621,0.0014869361],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99411213,0.0034556736,0.000596409,0.0005711728,0.0005140344,0.0007506009],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022362226,0.0007756452,0.0012231441,0.00029935013,0.0023150232,0.0007074263,0.0009130021,0.0004988945,0.0005921079],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028085676,0.0008090218,0.00052258075,0.00077576877,0.008970698,0.00052753807,0.0002390212,0.0010223805,0.00037291806],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002481796,0.0005703182,0.19054554,0.0002563565,0.00062344247,0.0007512207,0.006697261,0.00014389073,0.0011010912,0.7873241,0.009674831,0.0020637868],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0030406478,0.00025172398,0.088811204,0.003644453,0.0007495912,0.0018362249,0.0035501444,0.0010974588,0.00092652516,0.005346045,0.8887736,0.001972353],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007945577,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00011479486,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8790988,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017567715,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0053806095,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994361},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2083976733","doi":"10.12818/p.0304-2340.2014v64p301","title":"MICHEL VILLEY Y LA CUESTIÓN DE LA DIALÉCTICA JURÍDICA - DOI: 10.12818/P.0304-2340.2014v64p301","year":2014,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Revista da Faculdade de Direito da UFMG","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Dialectic; Philosophy; Context (archaeology); Epistemology; Geography","score_opus":0.021477166212411854,"score_gpt":0.3714312907515158,"score_spread":0.34995412453910396,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2083976733","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17490783,0.02021972,0.0062136482,0.017070243,0.001345141,0.0021008411,0.00077153137,0.00091727823,0.7764538],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9846965,0.004734385,0.0014857766,0.0008643924,0.0020213753,0.00017480296,0.00007609135,0.00008706747,0.0058595925],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9898829,0.004345109,0.0010944428,0.0013664853,0.0015780015,0.0017330791],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99204314,0.004950261,0.0006229421,0.00095661683,0.00053348293,0.0008935429],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042570387,0.0009747502,0.0014176088,0.00028521306,0.0019316005,0.0024789926,0.0016738215,0.00070544303,0.0010250992],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0076128803,0.0009680888,0.00065235165,0.0010958767,0.005389924,0.0005670583,0.0007102058,0.0011697364,0.0022001886],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000158929,0.0006777696,0.024986532,0.0004225235,0.00046826105,0.00014428466,0.0038540536,0.000058218167,0.0018719957,0.84598887,0.108551994,0.012816545],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009822969,0.00012672211,0.029948134,0.000877821,0.00042511363,0.000038715603,0.00077968487,0.00027256025,0.00017318082,0.0022857476,0.962996,0.0010940441],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001517868,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006908231,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85444397,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000891778,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017003259,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998881},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2112410071","doi":"10.14198/doxa2008.31.16","title":"Algunos aspectos de la metateoría de Principia iuris","year":2008,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"DOXA Cuadernos de Filosofía del Derecho","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Optech (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Humanities; Domain (mathematical analysis); Mathematics","score_opus":0.042998497021014596,"score_gpt":0.35829624559932827,"score_spread":0.31529774857831366,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2112410071","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8365438,0.0073686903,0.005829753,0.0045074723,0.0006486643,0.0010793449,0.00018605575,0.000500305,0.14333591],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9832547,0.0071229306,0.004177342,0.0009307666,0.0009906354,0.0002190433,0.000016339387,0.0000702208,0.0032180375],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99284774,0.0022914123,0.000844465,0.0010337402,0.0011453716,0.0018372908],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99538887,0.0024389378,0.0004392942,0.00062583096,0.00047760957,0.00062947406],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001983949,0.0007678218,0.00093895505,0.0003313552,0.0024662123,0.0003979917,0.0012985803,0.0006618988,0.000978945],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002513112,0.0008150758,0.0005684476,0.0010623554,0.0040263957,0.00060736487,0.00043616325,0.0012817621,0.0014616785],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003725958,0.002034885,0.61846024,0.0002880634,0.0022936715,0.0021864178,0.08532866,0.0011074154,0.006083584,0.20410866,0.07063392,0.007101894],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0027484496,0.00031692075,0.44058472,0.0006344354,0.00079657935,0.0009502233,0.0066204295,0.0014809803,0.012743113,0.029293587,0.5013288,0.0025016996],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029491058,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00036501957,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43069494,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016967794,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038510882,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999343},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2130081002","doi":"10.22201/iij.24484873e.2006.117.3893","title":"Federalismo y democracia","year":2006,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Boletín Mexicano de Derecho Comparado","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.020425637725232915,"score_gpt":0.33828119871811785,"score_spread":0.3178555609928849,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2130081002","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.45299217,0.009347592,0.0025448222,0.01575935,0.0013310274,0.000818712,0.00009637687,0.00039148942,0.51671845],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98914343,0.0011181538,0.0016031587,0.0008994059,0.0018005716,0.00007852762,0.000024319826,0.000037800255,0.0052946056],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.994887,0.0008773263,0.0008070477,0.0008609585,0.0011842275,0.0013834672],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997748,0.0006068992,0.00039686786,0.0005003038,0.00038731305,0.00036060033],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009026202,0.00062060694,0.0009016569,0.0002311078,0.0025431206,0.0007592679,0.0009421092,0.00030356005,0.0005218045],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019000318,0.0006691746,0.00040044205,0.00097153836,0.0021564008,0.00037334996,0.00024653517,0.0005894819,0.0013389848],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009178437,0.00057115656,0.13148953,0.000054854976,0.00017760014,0.00009866408,0.0014065508,0.0003055354,0.0005540681,0.7478116,0.11196635,0.0054723127],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007704429,0.000051848896,0.30592725,0.00022728705,0.00014252575,0.000016507593,0.0013695755,0.00032966072,0.000755283,0.026235512,0.6632947,0.00087945536],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008345976,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00269446,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7215761,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00073557656,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012172831,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999576},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2132386362","doi":"","title":"Derechos humanos electorales: el caso Yatama contra el Estado de Nicaragua, análisis desde la perspectiva del sistema electoral costarricense","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dialnet (Universidad de la Rioja)","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Optech (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.019396006989133806,"score_gpt":0.3375664959680133,"score_spread":0.3181704889788795,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2132386362","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9348183,0.0018497414,0.0015150876,0.0019555693,0.00015700376,0.00061345694,0.000053347427,0.00029472733,0.058742758],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972733,0.0004545663,0.0008192352,0.00050092017,0.00034641143,0.000018364579,0.000013533011,0.000022742954,0.00055090565],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99585456,0.0014139909,0.0002962278,0.0006591027,0.00070856354,0.0010675414],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969279,0.001561064,0.00022985518,0.00035720292,0.00048123277,0.00044273926],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010471967,0.00039832012,0.00056343316,0.0003511345,0.0016652982,0.00032932684,0.000735157,0.0003564624,0.0002715532],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010034979,0.00046198964,0.00030057388,0.0010525989,0.0015964931,0.0007041664,0.000089405665,0.00060513476,0.00007094843],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006859455,0.00085466594,0.17716087,0.000043232805,0.000575619,0.0014619846,0.07378633,0.00031671583,0.010725721,0.70230865,0.026309583,0.00577068],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0039359867,0.00052845635,0.8195573,0.0003039107,0.000552535,0.00012772264,0.05326842,0.00047193916,0.0012268584,0.01851405,0.09948255,0.002030286],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007423578,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014834368,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6837946,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001977439,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018479103,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99978316},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2134508815","doi":"10.1093/jicj/mqv043","title":"Ana Isabel Pérez Cepeda (dir.),<i>El principio de Justicia Universal: Fundamentos y límites</i>[<i>The Principle of Universal Justice: Foundations and Limits</i>]Ana Isabel Pérez Cepeda (dir.) and Demelsa Benito Sánchez (ed.),<i>El Principio de Justicia Universal. Una Propuesta de Lege Ferenda</i>[<i>The Principle of Universal Justice. A de Lege Ferenda Proposal</i>]","year":2015,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International Criminal Justice","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Obligation; Economic Justice; Premise; Law; Nationality; Criminal justice; Political science; International law; State (computer science); Sociology; Universal jurisdiction; Human rights; Criminology; Humanities; Philosophy; Immigration; Epistemology","score_opus":0.047377534986639824,"score_gpt":0.37693342590606443,"score_spread":0.3295558909194246,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2134508815","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96215266,0.0039426386,0.018285735,0.005505158,0.0029509559,0.0016101087,0.0007390924,0.00010705491,0.004706608],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9780951,0.005522052,0.0111665595,0.00051488046,0.0021917517,0.000024810884,0.00004092173,0.00012188455,0.0023220517],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98919886,0.0020156684,0.0023782724,0.0011726818,0.0033252516,0.0019092415],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9847563,0.0036446776,0.0035385706,0.0007865592,0.005833355,0.0014405288],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0048704776,0.0012821737,0.0015820954,0.0010471386,0.0022311548,0.0006259031,0.003018532,0.0006151928,0.000147427],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0058802417,0.0011345532,0.00056282786,0.001503752,0.0054116747,0.0022345446,0.0015552485,0.0023786582,0.000017818891],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00743551,0.003916804,0.041066386,0.0058018435,0.004495778,0.0012629112,0.07159772,0.013192424,0.013236698,0.8286404,0.0067274254,0.002626122],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.017997451,0.005123212,0.12796436,0.007573505,0.07862057,0.0028474508,0.4872121,0.0667396,0.0043335436,0.005138107,0.19196394,0.004486181],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023995715,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022717763,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.82350224,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004817575,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013716922,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999993},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2172149638","doi":"","title":"Transformación de la democracia en Venezuela: una lectura crítica de la constitución del 99","year":2005,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Repositorio Institucional E-DocUR (Universidad Del Rosario)","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Political science; Argument (complex analysis); Democracy; Politics; Humanities; Presidential system; Polarization (electrochemistry); Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.009378861999925693,"score_gpt":0.3253211199998035,"score_spread":0.3159422579998778,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2172149638","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5857432,0.005454762,0.014067585,0.00791425,0.0020941652,0.00078689336,0.00021607008,0.00044863307,0.38327444],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98712635,0.0034376723,0.004798646,0.0002861471,0.0024641927,0.000039354378,0.000029683455,0.000050587794,0.0017673904],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9930037,0.001743393,0.0008716504,0.0011387703,0.0017453448,0.001497116],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99461055,0.0028723406,0.00046506833,0.0005126318,0.00072098523,0.0008184148],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020797981,0.0008914629,0.00096823653,0.0005641822,0.004123091,0.0008901439,0.0013026557,0.0009916613,0.00022737596],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00090933824,0.001023421,0.00067396805,0.0013843331,0.005189504,0.0018807893,0.0003624502,0.0016682035,0.00034286626],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00048117645,0.00066164485,0.018886162,0.00011638812,0.0007555996,0.0010515281,0.019713199,0.0074285585,0.0035996109,0.93514925,0.0033575632,0.008799302],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0031464603,0.00021687169,0.03665826,0.0009026812,0.00075967744,0.0012253576,0.004615201,0.002617747,0.0014449584,0.0052277017,0.94144243,0.0017426373],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024080435,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00091802527,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9380849,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004313302,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008324503,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999509},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2198751096","doi":"","title":"EL DERECHO INTERNACIONAL Y LAS SANCIONES ECONÓMICAS IMPUESTAS POR EL CONSEJO DE SEGURIDAD DE LAS NACIONES UNIDAS: IMPLICACIONES EN EL CAMPO DE LOS DERECHOS ECONÓMICOS, SOCIALES Y CULTURALES","year":2012,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"International Law: Revista Colombiana de Derecho Internacional","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03544377293727255,"score_gpt":0.3971478491219716,"score_spread":0.361704076184699,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2198751096","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93327475,0.007997223,0.0053416034,0.021142576,0.0034079074,0.0016492917,0.0039129993,0.00054138096,0.022732288],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98127174,0.0033908929,0.0032355841,0.002938026,0.005224546,0.00056537037,0.0005609194,0.00017193613,0.0026409863],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9880778,0.0026010699,0.002403708,0.0017153214,0.0021551508,0.0030469086],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99054754,0.0039021012,0.001678859,0.00071556977,0.0018176108,0.0013383371],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.003890918,0.0016847509,0.0017012313,0.0007320359,0.001991145,0.0015255087,0.0032334419,0.0012313949,0.0015970891],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00245054,0.0018079118,0.0013733095,0.00064676383,0.003690506,0.002117844,0.0012005942,0.0020287235,0.00069946214],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00060842675,0.0011596672,0.19700027,0.00022065266,0.001830913,0.00016109347,0.005067801,0.00008911237,0.004443502,0.77129406,0.016423075,0.0017014149],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0037419158,0.00033886352,0.16727088,0.0034827935,0.0009309971,0.0022805124,0.008774809,0.0012988637,0.0064225253,0.06797759,0.73376036,0.0037198735],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006095874,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009116629,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7173373,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010183576,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0043544983,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995899},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2203899788","doi":"10.5354/0719-5249.2001.36305","title":"Prácticas extraconstitucionales de fin de siglo","year":2015,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Revista de Derecho Público","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Literal (mathematical logic); Quarter (Canadian coin); Humanities; State (computer science); Fin; Art; Philosophy; Political science; History; Linguistics; Mathematics; Engineering; Algorithm","score_opus":0.0911701510176986,"score_gpt":0.40346277455172697,"score_spread":0.31229262353402837,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2203899788","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.63698775,0.057635088,0.024760768,0.03283905,0.0012931115,0.0016937866,0.00023909524,0.00054460036,0.24400675],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9876774,0.0039968183,0.003967301,0.0007281976,0.0014128104,0.000086468746,0.000009285424,0.00002612504,0.0020955969],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.995631,0.001258561,0.0005459899,0.0005956546,0.00085730775,0.0011115205],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965466,0.0013221778,0.00027843815,0.00039455036,0.0006312128,0.0008269756],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003136943,0.000408352,0.0005869163,0.00020182313,0.00082560536,0.0008228018,0.0007395906,0.00031653434,0.00027274995],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0059376094,0.00042794197,0.00025866096,0.0008666836,0.0020849125,0.00043963006,0.00023366744,0.00059402606,0.000730561],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000076068136,0.00038409152,0.06942192,0.00012026287,0.00019588399,0.00013608554,0.009576176,0.00009625624,0.0003539681,0.8559701,0.056475956,0.007193253],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00053426216,0.000085844156,0.013818062,0.0005242228,0.00017698618,0.00009791548,0.0044433647,0.00023400306,0.00016812171,0.0072944486,0.97206414,0.0005586551],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006318037,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00044940467,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91558814,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021167242,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008278236,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99981725},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2223133756","doi":"","title":"S NCHEZ CORDERO, A LA REAL ACADEMIA DE JURISPRUDENCIA","year":2012,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Gaceta UNAM (2010-2016)","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.03869253255945011,"score_gpt":0.36374655343574164,"score_spread":0.32505402087629154,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2223133756","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.57843304,0.017378913,0.0007601438,0.01029157,0.0058841356,0.0012535129,0.00016539625,0.0004656031,0.38536772],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9547064,0.018621873,0.0008583195,0.00044593107,0.0032985976,0.00012861131,0.0000138757205,0.000055989534,0.021870432],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99308974,0.0014023498,0.0008468933,0.00086499884,0.0015101013,0.002285933],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959445,0.0013773309,0.00056474097,0.0006913032,0.000479717,0.00094242103],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037404394,0.00076442043,0.00095763744,0.00028358746,0.0017457036,0.00035558583,0.0013063693,0.0012405468,0.0011151979],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012961507,0.00073963526,0.00041521015,0.0010163775,0.0036102156,0.0012994269,0.0006992277,0.0019085006,0.0034626517],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019327705,0.000799858,0.35993868,0.00014547959,0.00057690084,0.00003899651,0.035239335,0.000018184224,0.0027872971,0.2625187,0.3242655,0.013477763],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00076083967,0.000073979565,0.44303808,0.00037882102,0.00029692426,0.000025710016,0.0051911515,0.00003490816,0.00027367639,0.0015969109,0.5474136,0.0009154057],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034038783,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007678804,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.37627336,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00086819864,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025139267,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99979794},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2253721968","doi":"","title":"EXTENSO LEGADO ACADÉMICO DE JORGE CARPIZO","year":2012,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Gaceta UNAM (2010-2015)","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Art; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04769581760138006,"score_gpt":0.37752247881495965,"score_spread":0.3298266612135796,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2253721968","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6358281,0.075335816,0.0016470806,0.0650275,0.021554254,0.002225895,0.00037959864,0.00071358756,0.19728822],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95803744,0.0037464735,0.00048428526,0.00064487214,0.0037093242,0.00007971829,0.000011691478,0.000048047295,0.03323814],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.994058,0.0008145894,0.00071360124,0.00079252094,0.0013621402,0.0022591327],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99679893,0.00055341906,0.00042390195,0.00076215435,0.0005797722,0.00088179973],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.002316931,0.00068931864,0.0008872076,0.0002629966,0.0019088474,0.00038708013,0.0010903367,0.00048427196,0.0015924197],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010128873,0.0006718977,0.0004117103,0.0008992659,0.0028806932,0.0014707717,0.00059603056,0.00088360265,0.004980732],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000114101684,0.0007834379,0.21207716,0.000113508446,0.00051049126,0.000032622207,0.02399273,0.000035087225,0.0028234913,0.25797302,0.49813223,0.0034121482],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00060782366,0.000058804988,0.19715796,0.00017908508,0.0002473011,0.000024860508,0.0049067265,0.000049427126,0.00050181965,0.0010379518,0.79437464,0.0008535902],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001815604,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011967581,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3222094,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007873345,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011004512,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99983287},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2269288550","doi":"","title":"Internally Displaced Persons and Indigenous Peoples: The Necessity of a Special Protection Regime (Desplazamientos Internos Y Pueblos Indígenas: Sobre La Necesidad De Un Régimen De Protección Especial)","year":2008,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Political science; Human rights; Internally displaced person; Globe; Law; Convention; Political economy; Sociology; Medicine; Refugee","score_opus":0.012964424756551315,"score_gpt":0.28043604944409295,"score_spread":0.26747162468754165,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2269288550","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9823254,0.0021981734,0.006955797,0.0034186603,0.00024722712,0.001368021,0.000021574471,0.000034243894,0.0034308985],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9867083,0.009034524,0.00006771885,0.000048296744,0.0023587453,0.00006586432,0.0000010754694,0.000026069167,0.0016894111],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99393106,0.0017167749,0.00065506884,0.0004600459,0.00095993525,0.0022770993],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978631,0.00044623303,0.00091576733,0.00022231655,0.00033816524,0.00021438839],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003911857,0.00042871514,0.0005617118,0.00026962865,0.0029574118,0.0002818145,0.00093984633,0.00025887176,0.000040166222],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00082912145,0.00034215493,0.0002944192,0.00064216455,0.0023157015,0.00052258285,0.0002711492,0.003014633,0.000013085096],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0031928949,0.001364198,0.16164228,0.00020137563,0.0030133983,0.00019374624,0.70492905,0.000069327194,0.006293726,0.079620644,0.0009071736,0.03857218],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0091388,0.006011922,0.34883785,0.0032019548,0.0014752729,0.014964085,0.45677197,0.00038714008,0.0076889307,0.12099613,0.02761143,0.0029145132],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023800323,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018739829,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24815708,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002679727,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014650381,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999903},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2282560196","doi":"10.7202/1100696ar","title":"EN BÚSQUEDA DEL NUEVO DERECHO INDÍGENA","year":2023,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Revue québécoise de droit international","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Derecho; Geography; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.029895613039557987,"score_gpt":0.34481363673970106,"score_spread":0.31491802370014305,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2282560196","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5344636,0.00056211,0.00085204013,0.019851297,0.0040172036,0.0005464436,0.0003627435,0.00041168454,0.4389329],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.981569,0.0039319787,0.00024999684,0.00048579596,0.0025358894,0.00011429477,0.0000775387,0.000029875671,0.011005652],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970004,0.00027801027,0.00054000545,0.00060274976,0.0009279358,0.00065090536],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99773157,0.00096951425,0.00025469004,0.00027337906,0.00053808355,0.00023277708],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010325254,0.00030417077,0.0003795466,0.00045966293,0.00057872024,0.0002777901,0.0011179866,0.00022616542,0.0006745666],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015433773,0.00037807538,0.00029767232,0.000978455,0.00061201805,0.00042830998,0.00028916524,0.00044266082,0.0037488884],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005922805,0.00015615465,0.032779034,0.000057879002,0.0004076581,0.00017221773,0.011419485,0.00043965652,0.0003839756,0.9317377,0.014056768,0.008330218],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00060972583,0.00006416134,0.11717686,0.00064727373,0.000097484546,0.0000495385,0.004164187,0.004207711,0.00014333191,0.05202963,0.8201008,0.00070933206],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0043634353,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005790537,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8797081,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015832039,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012432572,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99986714},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2286488511","doi":"10.7202/1100694ar","title":"EL DERECHO DE ACCESO A LA JURISDICCIÓN EN MÉXICO Y OTROS PAISES DE AMERICA LATINA","year":2023,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Revue québécoise de droit international","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.023371813149178154,"score_gpt":0.35546109796810466,"score_spread":0.3320892848189265,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2286488511","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.63585335,0.0004725289,0.0040198113,0.018113581,0.0011320177,0.000546773,0.00038416046,0.0004832697,0.3389945],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98624146,0.0059808115,0.0009424056,0.0007043753,0.0018106968,0.00020448536,0.000050096187,0.000036095626,0.0040295767],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99661124,0.0006307782,0.00053689635,0.0005952998,0.00079199765,0.0008337629],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964697,0.0022541974,0.000339904,0.00026118406,0.00037736984,0.00029767014],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011910587,0.00034416417,0.00044657942,0.00040364824,0.00061194925,0.00040312376,0.0011773331,0.0002340983,0.00039672857],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025080466,0.0004171892,0.00033817408,0.0009341973,0.00091910566,0.00042059916,0.00031300084,0.0005256723,0.00084217795],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014091814,0.00039777457,0.21444651,0.00012335292,0.0006433937,0.00042196864,0.028801404,0.0014433832,0.0013154447,0.7160987,0.013143161,0.023023924],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005390883,0.00007991592,0.34251904,0.00060419884,0.0001256383,0.00008096479,0.0035579856,0.006251706,0.00018674647,0.03679021,0.608665,0.00059949356],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007674081,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003932225,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.67930853,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018701224,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021912258,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999358},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2339861418","doi":"","title":"UTILIZACIÓN DEL DERECHO CONSTITUCIONAL COMPARADO EN LA INTERPRETACIÓN CONSTITUCIONAL: NUEVOS RETOS A LA TEORÍA CONSTITUCIONAL The use of compared constitutional law in constitutional interpretation: new challenges to the constitutional theory","year":2007,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Adjudication; Constitutional law; Political science; Law; Argumentation theory; Context (archaeology); Situated; Interpretation (philosophy); Constitutional review; Humanities; Philosophy; Geography; Epistemology","score_opus":0.07942994834887632,"score_gpt":0.36450615298498357,"score_spread":0.2850762046361073,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2339861418","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008832011,0.012042556,0.45253047,0.037557486,0.0057582096,0.006567902,0.0032053443,0.00042541916,0.4730806],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9877424,0.001684413,0.005078726,0.0033983337,0.0010628637,0.0002521629,0.00019195986,0.000034908073,0.0005541832],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98370284,0.0048832116,0.0035749234,0.0020885384,0.0038845914,0.001865901],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9512568,0.043149307,0.0012025395,0.0011706118,0.002207854,0.001012862],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00972982,0.0016643276,0.0021063206,0.001069755,0.0030193839,0.0007548005,0.0027310636,0.00093439047,0.0015330338],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0072111744,0.0012742947,0.000958409,0.0021278507,0.13242081,0.0018735522,0.0013351266,0.0024413245,0.0005594764],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0026420518,0.0010389776,0.010845508,0.000127141,0.0011668869,0.00019452086,0.008604443,0.011793548,0.000099512254,0.9525907,0.009028849,0.0018678582],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004749353,0.00021485906,0.01780846,0.004242057,0.0005504663,0.0014896243,0.013944744,0.0016980671,0.00017685232,0.040009525,0.9130678,0.0020481884],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00087882415,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010287865,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97891045,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012833368,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01581865,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998601},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2345767012","doi":"","title":"El Derecho de Defensa en la Jurisprudencia de la Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos (The Right of Defence under the Jurisprudence of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights)","year":2010,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Humanities; Political science; Human rights; Derecho; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.007362217167607629,"score_gpt":0.3370642327637867,"score_spread":0.32970201559617907,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2345767012","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98113686,0.0011212166,0.00957256,0.0027076292,0.000272226,0.00043514912,0.000018281733,0.000018487552,0.0047175796],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968263,0.0022247077,0.00023996142,0.00013968344,0.00030777272,0.000028152128,4.688499e-7,0.000026040529,0.00020692842],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99167013,0.0037423028,0.0010441592,0.00039813627,0.0011105803,0.0020346942],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9926331,0.003943649,0.0019461218,0.00066611974,0.0006487491,0.00016225493],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.008320048,0.0004431247,0.0007575934,0.00017460455,0.0020968372,0.00014497135,0.0033843038,0.00022097495,0.00008756737],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00079899066,0.00026015745,0.0006142899,0.0010052159,0.014370498,0.00023570492,0.000420044,0.0050523207,0.000005834777],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000100071185,0.00041702186,0.09153891,0.000029518029,0.00092104706,0.000006095636,0.018488351,0.00009046816,0.031453565,0.8545763,0.00025759308,0.0021210583],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010716008,0.0009921825,0.29560435,0.0009507775,0.0012047645,0.0008615557,0.049955867,0.00017773041,0.026694648,0.6092682,0.012377832,0.0008405296],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010440421,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05494329,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24530813,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013565106,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008917161,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99998504},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W235349360","doi":"","title":"The Inter-American Human Rights System in Crisis","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the Annual Meeting-American Society of International Law","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Context (archaeology); Human rights; Law; Authoritarianism; Public administration; Democracy; Politics; Geography","score_opus":0.013329862375810348,"score_gpt":0.3080409295311624,"score_spread":0.29471106715535206,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W235349360","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7805677,0.00008035395,0.000011620961,0.016248634,0.00029839383,0.00044226184,0.000026503303,0.00004840095,0.20227613],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99829596,0.000034206198,0.00065654627,0.0002449508,0.00018475406,0.000055523364,5.776831e-7,0.0000074754207,0.0005199774],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980175,0.000051808547,0.0005238707,0.00025062746,0.0008579294,0.0002982446],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967722,0.0003190162,0.00088182674,0.00009811845,0.0018720923,0.0000567036],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008432378,0.000155312,0.00032158865,0.000041231535,0.00093475956,0.00009893328,0.0013393669,0.000030304564,0.00001361936],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017250443,0.000101726764,0.00028752012,0.0005617203,0.0060292836,0.00047776787,0.00037263657,0.0002036709,0.000008590782],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000147752835,0.00007837213,0.032660045,0.000023077617,0.00017227593,7.622618e-8,0.017409971,0.0000047764847,0.0010356092,0.92259586,0.02566814,0.00033701435],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004120777,0.00020029541,0.04500092,0.0007127304,0.000048489783,0.0000029360237,0.71490765,0.00011942092,0.0036219512,0.012615618,0.22190842,0.0004495057],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06435401,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033312917,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90998024,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00031177214,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000054873617,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9966757},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2408761573","doi":"","title":"Bjarne Melkevik y su particular visión de la epistemología jurídica","year":2015,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Revista europea de historia de las ideas políticas y de las instituciones públicas/Revista europea de historia de las ideas políticas y de las instituciones públicas","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03199347303606025,"score_gpt":0.34355736777605506,"score_spread":0.3115638947399948,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2408761573","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.31433454,0.16550209,0.050229434,0.04927754,0.022756515,0.012801054,0.0030125757,0.0089429235,0.37314335],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9433452,0.00990527,0.013704882,0.0064704265,0.015720341,0.00091534824,0.0002624442,0.0012692619,0.008406857],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.95123845,0.0217496,0.006694025,0.0057773488,0.004901881,0.009638672],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9706149,0.0055263657,0.0041624256,0.0060056094,0.004102418,0.009588291],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.021837145,0.0050944686,0.0062425844,0.0030315327,0.0062551294,0.0054840655,0.0080504585,0.003265463,0.0007111455],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04356259,0.0056956494,0.002751208,0.0070696073,0.011066804,0.002735095,0.003177834,0.0070643616,0.0039953687],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0018091676,0.0023202873,0.008597956,0.0016198192,0.0014316427,0.010047138,0.0124496,0.0013815304,0.0022038142,0.7865018,0.17073844,0.00089875236],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0061616334,0.0010755915,0.0034841995,0.0028790385,0.004018729,0.0054119094,0.0014062528,0.0018803865,0.00020126486,0.010158095,0.9578007,0.0055222097],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005666572,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010833391,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7870622,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.038913712,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02438669,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9980285},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2411071458","doi":"","title":"Palabra de abundancia: saberes indígenas que fortalecen diálogos interculturales de derechos humanos en la Amazonia colombiana","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Americanae (AECID Library)","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Amazon rainforest; Humanities; Geography; Philosophy; Biology; Ecology","score_opus":0.02567007427973995,"score_gpt":0.33122271278398524,"score_spread":0.3055526385042453,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2411071458","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94013244,0.0011290472,0.00060999783,0.005775473,0.00022715834,0.00043508812,0.000031885043,0.00031536436,0.05134352],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9918737,0.000546881,0.0033757295,0.0013561419,0.00039275657,0.00012774537,0.000016851569,0.000027144912,0.0022830777],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.997193,0.000853604,0.00033875098,0.00042240974,0.00046901082,0.0007232731],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99823314,0.0007156409,0.00020041404,0.00023966948,0.00013103169,0.00048010526],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00042926054,0.00028109967,0.00042199853,0.00013819106,0.00062519975,0.00015783429,0.00078543695,0.00014469842,0.00037010608],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00092936656,0.00026677368,0.00014018327,0.00070349517,0.002410884,0.0011798987,0.0002760721,0.00034888255,0.00011600622],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004042327,0.00009345828,0.85520786,0.000008526843,0.00015187667,0.00007447138,0.028959142,0.00001645085,0.00026517085,0.043959048,0.0675799,0.0036436594],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00046245227,0.00017677307,0.7247144,0.00009127594,0.00006024865,0.000012394763,0.029241277,0.000022624772,0.0012402452,0.008104956,0.2352846,0.00058878446],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05551511,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015415494,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16770469,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00046403956,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022221073,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999784},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2419599525","doi":"","title":"La anticoncepción como acto contra la vida y los casos de violación. La solución de G. Grisez","year":2012,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Alpha Omegan","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Humanities; Political science","score_opus":0.024101068837851056,"score_gpt":0.3760991621746144,"score_spread":0.35199809333676335,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2419599525","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8667691,0.0058125807,0.00063990045,0.0023471008,0.0006669432,0.00054818526,0.00013749572,0.00016890536,0.12290984],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99479866,0.0026289772,0.00023232255,0.00046674893,0.0010697021,0.000070644004,0.000008021694,0.000035900666,0.00068901735],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9943764,0.002372586,0.00049299945,0.0004898694,0.0007606802,0.0015074499],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99464697,0.0038126209,0.0002819698,0.00037379365,0.00024793603,0.00063674065],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002858328,0.00049933314,0.00069409836,0.00015167696,0.0011826556,0.0004181956,0.0007495825,0.00043624523,0.00019837003],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010806852,0.00049788045,0.00028377387,0.0006134269,0.003993924,0.00089048856,0.00032243357,0.00076317764,0.00038102758],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000089334164,0.0006649729,0.53777516,0.00009146328,0.00040867727,0.00012749594,0.029649043,0.000012131744,0.0023735906,0.41697505,0.0065975105,0.005235557],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013429461,0.00010192135,0.33092165,0.0004753701,0.00033572657,0.00014920044,0.012723125,0.00010702019,0.0014147769,0.001991224,0.6495193,0.0009177458],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019043728,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009247032,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6429218,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004861949,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011126881,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997473},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2467154805","doi":"","title":"José Miguel Gambra y Manuel Oriol, Lógica aristotélica - José Miguel Gambra y Manuel Oriol, Ejercicios de lógica aristotélica","year":2009,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Alpha Omegan","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Art","score_opus":0.02191420628507347,"score_gpt":0.35137901785263637,"score_spread":0.3294648115675629,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2467154805","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5135636,0.026602589,0.0021257724,0.05787505,0.0046615754,0.0045791767,0.0008821958,0.0016569482,0.38805315],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9728196,0.007658707,0.001289468,0.003749547,0.002032196,0.00021816796,0.00011615265,0.00012600496,0.011990133],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9868316,0.0013494422,0.0022409705,0.0029054775,0.0030083484,0.0036641469],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99244034,0.0014849633,0.0012915218,0.001976268,0.0011706648,0.0016362247],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022244735,0.0019897083,0.0024815577,0.0008581461,0.0046633915,0.0013545271,0.00329328,0.0011328389,0.00090718607],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016213317,0.0020267027,0.001258818,0.0028525116,0.004705385,0.0016549052,0.0007886457,0.0021902293,0.0034694646],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0016268317,0.005604042,0.02902959,0.00052923785,0.0018682266,0.001369561,0.039336447,0.00018424015,0.009035053,0.683407,0.20267406,0.025335735],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0022653285,0.0010164664,0.21689802,0.0007239804,0.0006471056,0.000097971184,0.0051810793,0.00021607052,0.00061100535,0.01616816,0.753531,0.0026438204],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026558181,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017723226,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.66723883,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019356732,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022083945,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996822},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2467685831","doi":"10.22201/iij.24485306e.2011.7.7760","title":"Federalism and constitutional Judicial Review in Mexico and the united states: a Normative Assessment of two Different Jurisdictional schemes","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Mexican Law Review","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"York University","keywords":"Federalism; Normative; Law; Political science; Judicial review; Politics","score_opus":0.06372745995547327,"score_gpt":0.3919226954474803,"score_spread":0.328195235492007,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2467685831","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.036819212,0.8089717,0.0025893613,0.03478909,0.00035227856,0.0045695473,0.00018753872,0.00006558464,0.11165571],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6175178,0.37870482,0.00022880292,0.0033516637,0.000028235643,0.00013731544,0.00001797296,0.0000021341252,0.000011233502],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978876,0.00080787414,0.0004963686,0.00019627973,0.00043461224,0.00017723284],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99893326,0.0004156984,0.00022891622,0.00010240011,0.00024433807,0.00007537431],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013997738,0.00015355383,0.00060168584,0.000048444268,0.0005073611,0.000017842984,0.00014610171,0.000022069387,0.00022193955],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017723185,0.00009786224,0.00007468063,0.0003327268,0.011683961,0.000147213,0.00011075268,0.00017096044,0.0000020689222],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000096369,0.00005030733,0.005063386,0.000560893,0.000052495077,0.0000014698065,0.0011276361,3.5526136e-7,4.3456853e-7,0.9923201,0.00050552277,0.00030776038],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0042697485,0.00014516541,0.04933574,0.05234514,0.0007545644,0.000029028206,0.0017522873,0.0001558051,0.000025613386,0.12175584,0.76862764,0.0008034402],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020592145,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024238587,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8705643,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000082702594,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002687777,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99100566},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2483182129","doi":"10.1016/j.mexlaw.2016.07.006","title":"THE EXHAUSTION OF DOMESTIC REMEDIES AND THE NOTION OF AN EARLY STAGE IN THE CASE OF BREWER CARÍAS. IS THE INTER-AMERICAN HUMAN RIGHTS SYSTEM AT RISK?","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Mexican Law Review","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México; Universidad de Guadalajara; Canadian Bureau for International Education","keywords":"Stage (stratigraphy); Human rights; Law; Political science; Business; Law and economics; Sociology; Biology","score_opus":0.028736661397032282,"score_gpt":0.36712501990105895,"score_spread":0.33838835850402665,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2483182129","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97304654,0.017891573,0.000026992573,0.0035754896,0.00008390502,0.0010304969,0.000047044276,0.000007687039,0.004290277],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9933796,0.006384905,0.0000068493628,0.000053855998,0.000034927303,0.0000493695,3.717717e-7,0.0000023813163,0.00008776532],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971332,0.0018454631,0.00043518926,0.00014403928,0.00031017122,0.00013193299],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997377,0.0014819027,0.0005585852,0.00033876835,0.00022028708,0.000023480081],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033577678,0.00009947774,0.0003710868,0.00001818406,0.0009187509,0.000015561385,0.0003473622,0.000016472377,0.000012620406],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00029423117,0.00003222357,0.000090232556,0.0002689166,0.007821352,0.00009721524,0.0000815675,0.000082291495,0.0000018738675],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000370054,0.000026930675,0.002206007,0.0002894459,0.000057601093,0.000008395001,0.011791431,3.5738435e-7,0.000035546916,0.9806787,0.00017070939,0.0046978854],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005086338,0.0021375946,0.23200095,0.04284495,0.0032649182,0.0002709137,0.11630342,0.00007169354,0.0015473115,0.030778036,0.56424314,0.0014507212],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05252035,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15293294,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9499006,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007273402,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000035534023,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99487877},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2512364828","doi":"10.21501/23394536.2082","title":"Colombia: ¿Una democracia censitaria?","year":2016,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Summa Iuris","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Optech (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.025835378393868402,"score_gpt":0.3504440447424479,"score_spread":0.3246086663485795,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2512364828","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.59918505,0.0039956053,0.0007790855,0.06699604,0.0036235752,0.000936252,0.0003361136,0.0003114271,0.32383686],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9857606,0.0027715524,0.00020936776,0.00023157393,0.0009638934,0.00003291146,0.000002475798,0.000016380242,0.010011196],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99688864,0.00042099308,0.00043497287,0.0006206627,0.0008422804,0.0007924735],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99763143,0.0010243313,0.00021993439,0.00035634413,0.0005162391,0.00025172372],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006451072,0.00033504778,0.00049101637,0.00012923834,0.0014126156,0.0001500581,0.0005159506,0.00020946446,0.0012618366],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010173589,0.00025078503,0.00022996386,0.0005743307,0.0027254606,0.0004699796,0.00030861396,0.00018622511,0.004463812],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000142205,0.0002857174,0.17618291,0.000040347204,0.00037976436,0.00010112455,0.004313324,0.0000013209233,0.0024989892,0.6132472,0.16493283,0.037874255],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008232842,0.00013263104,0.14863959,0.00056141324,0.00010758568,0.000003448748,0.001871861,0.0000041076496,0.0009566848,0.019747894,0.82652074,0.0006307534],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008189727,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017332172,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6615879,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000428896,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000657411,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99999446},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2522761415","doi":"10.7202/1067945ar","title":"DESARROLLO DE LA JURISPRUDENCIA EN CHILE SOBRE LA CONSULTA INDÍGENA: LOS CASOS DEL TRIBUNAL CONSTITUCIONAL Y LA CORTE SUPREMA","year":2020,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Revue québécoise de droit international","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tribunal; Humanities; Political science; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.016978939112066698,"score_gpt":0.3152872854229678,"score_spread":0.2983083463109011,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2522761415","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5906475,0.001114033,0.0039912476,0.014248716,0.0009491746,0.0009403548,0.0026637902,0.00025444917,0.38519073],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99225944,0.002399714,0.0008615705,0.0012999717,0.0021099243,0.00012754304,0.000121050645,0.000044824767,0.00077596446],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9946851,0.0014856082,0.0008304561,0.00093710725,0.0012784185,0.00078331266],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.993151,0.0046344404,0.0005099395,0.0002603676,0.0007945886,0.0006496255],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017398868,0.0005758147,0.00076668523,0.0002550579,0.0007217399,0.000547949,0.0014136297,0.0005606811,0.00080372137],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004463351,0.00069306226,0.00048604372,0.0006245628,0.002961052,0.00052524847,0.00039335623,0.001185405,0.0003928011],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00045876956,0.0004968509,0.067444764,0.00013053199,0.00094569504,0.0010629807,0.013028031,0.00073623593,0.0013930702,0.9010866,0.010094449,0.0031219982],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00308938,0.00016325469,0.09041347,0.0010023618,0.00042975886,0.0011402199,0.0029160078,0.006173227,0.00040245746,0.010308872,0.8827024,0.0012585517],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015783441,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020932127,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89077777,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001387102,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005748,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998885},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2523785034","doi":"10.7202/1068393ar","title":"THE ROLE OF INTERNATIONAL REGIMES IN THE CONSTITUTION OF STATE BEHAVIOR AND IDENTITY: THE CASE OF CONTEMPORARY MEXICO","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue québécoise de droit international","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Argument (complex analysis); Normative; Politics; Constitution; State (computer science); Political science; Argumentation theory; International relations; Identity (music); Law and economics; Political economy; Sociology; Environmental ethics; Law; Epistemology","score_opus":0.03181577027410935,"score_gpt":0.3339108188424717,"score_spread":0.30209504856836233,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2523785034","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91821647,0.0017895387,0.00033432298,0.011575889,0.0002768594,0.00043626668,0.00014976252,0.000008648881,0.067212224],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99915236,0.00051590195,0.000036598154,0.00012275949,0.000082770785,0.00003482852,0.00000459725,0.000002211028,0.000047952308],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99885774,0.00018875582,0.00038078465,0.00012573307,0.0003546472,0.000092371425],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99853194,0.0006770755,0.00031582444,0.000100096244,0.0003460241,0.000029042485],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008513022,0.00007020477,0.000142225,0.00005511632,0.00018491618,0.000042047726,0.00055620127,0.000026819724,0.000017300294],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007816722,0.000048701957,0.000072164905,0.00018247613,0.0015840943,0.00026746938,0.00009004481,0.00012552924,0.0000013481202],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006365499,0.0000549233,0.059767883,0.0000074914424,0.00006852829,0.00004999506,0.017339716,0.00004201303,0.00033941268,0.9203922,0.00014555201,0.001728627],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002434622,0.00029620837,0.21846274,0.0006734684,0.00024362371,0.0007386563,0.23789907,0.004866327,0.004903941,0.21347636,0.31536502,0.00063996203],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009368544,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017864939,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.70691586,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007786336,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00040738186,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99722815},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2525482541","doi":"10.7202/1068392ar","title":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS AND THE INTER-AMERICAN SYSTEM OF HUMAN RIGHTS PROMOTION AND PROTECTION. STRATEGIC EXPLOITATION OF WINDOWS OF OPPORTUNITY","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue québécoise de droit international","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Promotion (chess); Exploit; International relations; International relations theory; Human rights; Order (exchange); Political science; Law and economics; International trade; Political economy; Law; Sociology; Economics; Computer security; Computer science","score_opus":0.06725276993745051,"score_gpt":0.3183040711625607,"score_spread":0.2510513012251102,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2525482541","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9136707,0.000044019063,0.003533987,0.0059072403,0.00016746757,0.0005689225,0.00006261102,0.000026928732,0.07601809],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994199,0.000024910225,0.0002328974,0.000014204619,0.0001286336,0.00004937598,0.000010041829,0.0000037857353,0.00011621542],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99880785,0.00019318491,0.00043694294,0.00016467138,0.00031866744,0.00007866771],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985596,0.00017883025,0.0005574612,0.00006944201,0.0005659077,0.00006875023],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00047766554,0.00008189919,0.00022726797,0.00011291203,0.00020094543,0.000022695805,0.00021109245,0.000033280292,0.00006431573],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003489685,0.00007477696,0.00006500494,0.00018491443,0.0012974924,0.00022399379,0.000052633095,0.00011235784,0.0000012384164],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010549371,0.00006213775,0.0038982173,0.00005890015,0.00013343434,0.000001248728,0.011055996,0.00007972724,0.0012373116,0.982744,0.000022089846,0.0006014708],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.013470765,0.0028864653,0.27741972,0.0049523627,0.0010393183,0.00018346244,0.18817809,0.09884876,0.0075159087,0.38004363,0.023545157,0.0019163479],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00573766,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003216179,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.60270035,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014308578,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015789902,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8673664},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2526211251","doi":"10.7202/1100691ar","title":"LE STATUT DE LA DÉCLARATION AMÉRICAINE DES DROITS ET DES DEVOIRS DE L’HOMME, REFLET DE L’ÉVOLUTION DU SYSTÈME INTERAMÉRICAIN DE PROTECTION DES DROITS DE LA PERSONNE","year":2023,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue québécoise de droit international","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Art","score_opus":0.03118975232040039,"score_gpt":0.33477131642597013,"score_spread":0.30358156410556975,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2526211251","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7884684,0.0008706671,0.14757214,0.0060891504,0.0004476574,0.00057708705,0.00014076418,0.0003351924,0.055498924],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98358476,0.002935876,0.008253772,0.00033504175,0.001103541,0.0005102548,0.00007991365,0.00006393965,0.0031329074],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9937787,0.0028690805,0.000701573,0.00069031294,0.00065554975,0.0013048003],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960293,0.002025313,0.00043563673,0.00022641529,0.00083802524,0.000445285],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.005968407,0.00046195058,0.00047534562,0.0005580813,0.0015835622,0.000529759,0.0007211081,0.00047887446,0.00007935481],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006942626,0.000613913,0.00033319966,0.0013760318,0.0035543276,0.001168995,0.00019628069,0.00086208933,0.000098011056],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024541313,0.00051195465,0.036920764,0.00030777583,0.00036728074,0.00031965104,0.05491443,0.0140294805,0.007689168,0.87823,0.0012901494,0.005173937],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014680661,0.0003300373,0.2628933,0.0029170138,0.00024007169,0.0021939096,0.015745943,0.07605298,0.0011905993,0.58506143,0.05078863,0.0011180224],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.046101186,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05428628,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.29316854,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014580304,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0063181687,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997162},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2527246274","doi":"10.7202/1067950ar","title":"GOBERNANZA EN DERECHOS HUMANOS: HACIA UNA EFICACIA Y EFICIENCIA INSTITUCIONAL","year":2020,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Revue québécoise de droit international","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Human rights; Humanities; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.03184959978510107,"score_gpt":0.3281575067089187,"score_spread":0.29630790692381764,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2527246274","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.48189765,0.0015897098,0.0045754868,0.055211995,0.0026608566,0.000987191,0.0006547117,0.00036335102,0.45205906],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99038744,0.001296554,0.0005624268,0.0026487398,0.0035650362,0.000078371624,0.00006316477,0.00003527924,0.0013630094],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99569327,0.0003098458,0.00085300056,0.0009827067,0.0014243977,0.0007367627],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997391,0.0006244559,0.00047518648,0.0002761329,0.0007266383,0.0005065869],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00065695005,0.00048653362,0.00059576385,0.00023723564,0.0008735305,0.00041498156,0.0017557628,0.00029611483,0.0013915332],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002402805,0.00059734244,0.00043958367,0.00072459196,0.00100985,0.0006373401,0.00037765392,0.0007511036,0.0017997005],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014769095,0.00030971612,0.017262956,0.00008963955,0.00033914336,0.0001446185,0.01697495,0.00060761365,0.00089938805,0.955517,0.0037613371,0.0039459686],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009784485,0.00017194363,0.054067742,0.00080356316,0.00014229836,0.00005004727,0.002492156,0.0033335947,0.00023959915,0.010925445,0.92582476,0.0009704078],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018062145,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029147344,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9445915,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016455359,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019189945,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996478},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W25274199","doi":"10.1080/13554794.2014.959974","title":"Derechos fundamentales y ordenanzas locales.","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Neurocase","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Réseau québécois de recherche sur le vieillissement","keywords":"Philosophy; Humanities","score_opus":0.029509137592738138,"score_gpt":0.3554300108121799,"score_spread":0.32592087321944174,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W25274199","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7219983,0.0003555078,0.005700307,0.0043322607,0.00074679917,0.00030791145,0.000006523943,0.00024208843,0.2663103],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973626,0.00007070244,0.00018683217,0.00088473846,0.00027957253,0.000016647595,0.000001043621,0.000005261849,0.0011925774],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998899,0.0001969002,0.00012029271,0.00021497787,0.0003195063,0.00024936837],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999335,0.00028916317,0.000042216452,0.00012713052,0.00009067431,0.00011582342],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00023646066,0.000093805276,0.00011606332,0.000047355767,0.0007493553,0.00006336906,0.00018554679,0.00003144059,0.00022720297],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005570138,0.0000899461,0.000048449412,0.00019828072,0.000866159,0.00014624055,0.000068265304,0.000100121026,0.0005381049],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005210121,0.00024481586,0.057775468,0.00002234131,0.000036953687,0.0000917163,0.0069375653,0.00007354807,0.0011503319,0.85575026,0.031820096,0.04604481],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017786739,0.000041633877,0.006439223,0.000014914798,0.00000945783,0.0000062391396,0.0012309324,0.00004083933,0.00020545263,0.0024663352,0.98922664,0.00014045517],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00038354585,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002143532,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9574066,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000061961284,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000117903335,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.69164294},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2528998707","doi":"10.7202/1067940ar","title":"UNE RÉFORME PÉNALE EN AMÉRIQUE LATINE QUI DEVRAIT CHERCHER SA LÉGITIMITÉ","year":2020,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue québécoise de droit international","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.04347782516127516,"score_gpt":0.31983467028290113,"score_spread":0.27635684512162595,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2528998707","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12808125,0.0026959802,0.007139147,0.29840797,0.0021122864,0.0005793812,0.00033931874,0.00016929377,0.56047535],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96002406,0.0015463466,0.0022262686,0.00418726,0.0047144736,0.00009679294,0.00006382477,0.00003582092,0.027105147],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99713916,0.00030115762,0.0006400157,0.0006069597,0.0007210664,0.00059161533],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99777526,0.00073401874,0.00029701903,0.00017944019,0.00060790434,0.0004063882],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00059688947,0.00034821007,0.00046445776,0.000102525446,0.00032984317,0.00013976358,0.00090471137,0.00026565717,0.0026727035],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016127831,0.00043919796,0.00033101434,0.00074033055,0.0009816589,0.0006533793,0.00020716504,0.00065394357,0.0013971414],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010239679,0.00021767095,0.011365917,0.0001024073,0.00042269376,0.00014071492,0.039698247,0.0012023018,0.00041121355,0.92570084,0.012589782,0.0080458205],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00061814295,0.000117046955,0.017745743,0.00043268394,0.00009234988,0.00006315769,0.004699521,0.006556828,0.0001690628,0.03267179,0.9362088,0.0006248632],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013446059,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.045555178,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92361903,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016888874,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012310707,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999806},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W25366595","doi":"10.1007/978-3-319-04981-6_5","title":"Decreto-Ley y tipo de gravamen","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Nueva Fiscalidad","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03066839710583526,"score_gpt":0.3766190674830123,"score_spread":0.3459506703771771,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W25366595","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6058614,0.00078486017,0.0043502646,0.01183548,0.0005074022,0.00032934087,0.000017489801,0.00023634128,0.37607738],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966932,0.00010510965,0.0011501611,0.0003910125,0.00034424404,0.000027392916,0.000002615487,0.000006286147,0.0012800042],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99871224,0.00010378343,0.0001481275,0.0002130324,0.00042074404,0.000402052],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994468,0.00008928682,0.00005060046,0.00013733219,0.0001166199,0.00015936619],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00039210654,0.00011081912,0.00015027798,0.000054616572,0.00072597543,0.000094141855,0.00028030586,0.00007112093,0.0002538792],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00041754387,0.00010909623,0.0000767717,0.00027469752,0.0007587271,0.00016933327,0.00006535534,0.00013253411,0.00051706407],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023562096,0.00013011189,0.03896907,0.000007062669,0.000039837156,0.00003849329,0.024534253,0.00015078447,0.0005783527,0.9220541,0.010197226,0.003277114],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00071584445,0.00006960223,0.06408852,0.00008676619,0.000036871483,0.000007959328,0.006519228,0.000008327876,0.0009937986,0.13715343,0.789902,0.0004177035],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015325126,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029439179,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7849007,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00038789227,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00055086566,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.66459846},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2548770425","doi":"","title":"La promoción de los derechos humanos y la democracia como condición de la cooperación al desarrollo","year":2002,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Revista Iberoamericana","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; European union; Democracy; Politics; Art; Law; Economics; International trade","score_opus":0.026312755853495604,"score_gpt":0.37094076470829623,"score_spread":0.3446280088548006,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2548770425","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6835074,0.018417608,0.0015083553,0.0060373642,0.00019914973,0.0015600888,0.00020809934,0.00033475138,0.2882272],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98503405,0.009695648,0.0009794118,0.0014226557,0.0002975951,0.00016113879,0.0000089672885,0.000057848167,0.0023426728],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9912012,0.0049074055,0.00076805777,0.0008701697,0.0010187118,0.0012344264],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99443185,0.0035552224,0.00055524556,0.00051569607,0.00037670683,0.00056530157],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022295741,0.0006662738,0.0011024175,0.00021481504,0.0017079352,0.0007953359,0.0009866805,0.00033996356,0.0013710365],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001900928,0.0006846049,0.00037566558,0.0013760473,0.008360076,0.00036972252,0.00028268906,0.0010917403,0.0005017426],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001481876,0.001954983,0.3572279,0.0005831245,0.0014314805,0.0013587824,0.03148025,0.00013824603,0.0016345344,0.38389677,0.13449484,0.08565091],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009804707,0.00020060658,0.051041335,0.00096528744,0.00039004555,0.00017349406,0.004037435,0.0006002177,0.00008939999,0.0007387536,0.9397058,0.0010771637],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019196679,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00026232548,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.80521095,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011422449,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011491544,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995917},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2566092028","doi":"","title":"El sistema federal en los Estados Unidos de América, México y Canadá: breve análisis comparativo","year":2012,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Documentos de Trabajo. Seminario Permanente de Ciencias Sociales","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.04330668131204524,"score_gpt":0.3731850832586836,"score_spread":0.32987840194663837,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2566092028","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9335443,0.005861668,0.0007516859,0.0048341816,0.00089714513,0.0014673279,0.00039929213,0.00023476251,0.052009642],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9889029,0.0025526194,0.00051574537,0.001117433,0.0018617882,0.00023802598,0.00007020371,0.000065661894,0.004675571],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9902812,0.002249655,0.0011211695,0.000990074,0.0019396526,0.0034182142],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9955143,0.0014114757,0.00072069705,0.0005204602,0.00050928997,0.001323825],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032574642,0.0010334993,0.0012991888,0.00040854164,0.0041552214,0.0009788169,0.0015269455,0.0005692312,0.0005380243],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00069304166,0.0011405494,0.00070038065,0.001387875,0.0040238956,0.0016425118,0.000451521,0.001050727,0.00024079192],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013434424,0.0015686805,0.59652716,0.00033074737,0.00070796977,0.00016148051,0.23240417,0.00015106618,0.0033849282,0.13477796,0.027799426,0.002052077],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002025338,0.0003997253,0.63622737,0.0011091299,0.0010588496,0.0002686864,0.16023694,0.0006411958,0.0022816027,0.0023364471,0.19037972,0.0030349684],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023656292,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02937199,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1625803,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00856569,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0052133217,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99910444},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2599320263","doi":"","title":"Constituciones Duraderas – Una Crítica Democrática (Enduring Constitutions – A Democratic Critique)","year":2011,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Democracy; Political science; Philosophy; Sociology; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.04342066246304023,"score_gpt":0.33164888925180125,"score_spread":0.28822822678876103,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2599320263","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.058037017,0.0054012276,0.0025466944,0.009103885,0.0027248713,0.0017603403,0.00023047384,0.00065606716,0.91953945],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99024,0.0018544324,0.0026049512,0.0012590716,0.0008604034,0.00020084782,0.000012644045,0.000038456863,0.0029292032],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99407107,0.00085091597,0.0012055719,0.0012049002,0.0011852281,0.0014823417],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99612004,0.0008508081,0.0003906064,0.0007767646,0.00087472645,0.0009870423],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008259404,0.00081351225,0.0010357719,0.0002724779,0.005166298,0.00051225733,0.0010469549,0.00040333715,0.0031071033],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018394098,0.0008460266,0.00044592124,0.0010261409,0.016572881,0.0015007528,0.00047581163,0.0009983489,0.0032362188],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006728486,0.00046367376,0.008473791,0.00014466057,0.00034280116,0.00022168271,0.0027947607,0.000012479129,0.0002799009,0.98362446,0.0033990685,0.00017544988],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004356524,0.00058755465,0.038182594,0.00612041,0.0018506679,0.00038778642,0.018907808,0.00020001674,0.0051678973,0.4692593,0.44987494,0.0051045166],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00447289,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005417483,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.932203,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00052432955,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022851196,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99939907},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2610167096","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v33i3.4888","title":"CONSTITUTIONAL CHALLENGES OF THE SOUTH: INDIGENOUS WATER RIGHTS IN CHILE - ANOTHER STEP IN THE “CIVILIZING MISSION?","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Fondo de Financiamiento de Centros de Investigación en Áreas Prioritarias; Comisión Nacional de Investigación Científica y Tecnológica; Centro de Recursos Hídricos para la Agricultura y la Minería; Universidad de Concepción; Fonds National de la Recherche Luxembourg","keywords":"Indigenous; Constitution; Political science; Sovereignty; Argument (complex analysis); Colonialism; Realm; Law; Scholarship; International law; Human rights; Subject (documents); Indigenous rights; Sociology; Law and economics; Political economy; Politics","score_opus":0.10371930265903341,"score_gpt":0.38210742238380613,"score_spread":0.27838811972477273,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2610167096","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8220252,0.000612462,0.000030719766,0.006238244,0.0004036201,0.00077669206,0.000017837301,0.000008719328,0.16988651],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995109,0.000037494563,0.000049071466,0.000120427016,0.00014833864,0.00001817441,3.0782e-7,0.000002431,0.00011287058],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99851245,0.00021965863,0.00026569696,0.00020162233,0.0005375877,0.00026300253],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99907386,0.00024640615,0.00016422039,0.0003569575,0.00012731823,0.000031219435],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008245661,0.000108388995,0.00021010723,0.0000810543,0.00088919565,0.0000809702,0.0014717154,0.000060510713,0.000089923844],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00039755172,0.000059599148,0.000056677287,0.000110764326,0.0019984485,0.00032657152,0.00030543975,0.00016373109,0.000017820166],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015030437,0.00045667557,0.1560912,0.0001803661,0.00007625946,0.000023828503,0.32711866,0.0007355549,0.00082542846,0.51263624,0.0004938901,0.0012115921],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00060572306,0.000036491303,0.9516612,0.00074154866,0.00006755469,0.000001625792,0.013330685,0.000010562167,0.0019777499,0.0031315163,0.028193256,0.00024203965],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031427303,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01533742,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7955701,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000057357644,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023408003,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.855864},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2612632780","doi":"10.18041/0124-0102/advocatus.27.935","title":"La necesidad de repensar el derecho Hiperconsumo y macdonalización de la sociedad","year":2016,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"ADVOCATUS","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Optech (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Derecho; Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.018964856696433573,"score_gpt":0.39237943533326797,"score_spread":0.3734145786368344,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2612632780","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.65818363,0.008277069,0.0023122977,0.014202506,0.0005804015,0.0004523828,0.00010403464,0.00027675653,0.31561092],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9850378,0.009995556,0.0007711653,0.0005440422,0.0005023141,0.00006905725,0.000002180643,0.000026817474,0.0030510696],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99535245,0.0019467095,0.00040359644,0.00062898675,0.0006631256,0.0010051454],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9944972,0.0042949566,0.00021490094,0.00037617405,0.0002707645,0.0003460337],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002320906,0.00037686157,0.00044222202,0.000112277456,0.0010332358,0.00023711167,0.00066730595,0.0004062897,0.0005104666],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021206387,0.00030471844,0.00026993486,0.00046067784,0.0050072786,0.0003957297,0.00026021604,0.00039457474,0.0008326444],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000078082565,0.00026594682,0.24347955,0.00005695909,0.00031060047,0.00016640649,0.012561375,0.000004457155,0.006325586,0.67692125,0.018177446,0.041652326],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010944295,0.00007046642,0.25551587,0.00067902764,0.00019207722,0.000086084234,0.0055528134,0.000013571775,0.0019809979,0.050463364,0.6835806,0.00077074236],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017797981,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00051897997,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6654031,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008878586,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026949174,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99994534},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W26139217","doi":"10.1152/japplphysiol.00334.2015","title":"MIR PUIGPELAT, Oriol: Globalización, Estado y Derecho. Las transformaciones recientes del Derecho administrativo.","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revista de Administración Pública","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of British Columbia; Government of Canada","keywords":"Derecho; Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04098672864666459,"score_gpt":0.37174239972651246,"score_spread":0.3307556710798479,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W26139217","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6697483,0.013348202,0.025148485,0.048457075,0.0012980953,0.003614667,0.0007064278,0.0016448121,0.2360339],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99167246,0.0019678867,0.0042737536,0.0004969951,0.00042969,0.0001479581,0.000044688113,0.00003490478,0.0009316883],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.995336,0.00041322006,0.0009491158,0.0008870713,0.0011382576,0.0012763677],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99724054,0.00048834464,0.0003324002,0.00054975186,0.0006116269,0.0007773341],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013158323,0.0005793558,0.0007078164,0.00022459173,0.002234191,0.0006147937,0.0010003416,0.000320884,0.00052124273],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013494577,0.00058533833,0.00041361115,0.0014522024,0.0018120668,0.0008202107,0.00010560309,0.00054723304,0.0004335392],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017936148,0.00059002166,0.007825458,0.00010932233,0.00017161667,0.0001766263,0.0054650554,0.000036448557,0.0005672533,0.9761741,0.0039638723,0.0047408273],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010875528,0.00034679542,0.007842855,0.00043441032,0.00015996513,0.00017232425,0.006122169,0.000010697361,0.0014839263,0.011115251,0.97020674,0.0010173093],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00051056035,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024308937,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96624285,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009865749,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0041082613,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996598},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2616210969","doi":"","title":"Integração: nova ordem federal?","year":2000,"lang":"pt","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.07759148722002214,"score_gpt":0.40910378797107455,"score_spread":0.3315123007510524,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2616210969","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05233386,0.0020678993,0.00031308635,0.0027498784,0.003986499,0.0008409829,0.000045783316,0.00020111712,0.9374609],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.65415215,0.001625012,0.00011253654,0.00031361918,0.00042191893,0.000049078895,0.00023060195,0.000021173017,0.34307387],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961154,0.00029998057,0.0007319672,0.00090208097,0.0011969897,0.0007536124],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980102,0.00039997548,0.0003007787,0.0002876166,0.00077497185,0.00022642012],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004404427,0.00065319997,0.00080984994,0.00025265338,0.0023040976,0.00036066188,0.00077508733,0.00047041354,0.0370133],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00031631175,0.0005929027,0.0003987034,0.0010502584,0.0009751341,0.0004028552,0.000069753485,0.0007192219,0.00786233],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009015389,0.00082010234,0.008099296,0.00021239444,0.0012874011,0.00008261381,0.1830661,0.00007212321,0.00014861874,0.4149346,0.27282694,0.11754827],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00071444834,0.00020564451,0.024518928,0.00095918105,0.00025403078,0.0000057035068,0.29415935,0.00013868212,0.00030131423,0.005005635,0.671452,0.002285063],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007234267,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.094324335,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6018183,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00042264708,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018705169,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99965227},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2622318499","doi":"","title":"Una aproximación al debate sobre la gobernanza de Internet (Segunda parte)","year":2011,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Letras Internacionales","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.052979622519094084,"score_gpt":0.35108708613107187,"score_spread":0.29810746361197776,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2622318499","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6535628,0.0021009676,0.003588138,0.0064170924,0.0016847095,0.00044821468,0.00013126754,0.00022906315,0.33183774],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98853815,0.0032922055,0.00081798795,0.0012346116,0.0006087806,0.00007373958,0.00001069941,0.000036560796,0.0053872503],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99608964,0.00066496996,0.00064873026,0.0007824031,0.00091070484,0.00090352603],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99800265,0.0006580626,0.00035309602,0.00033390685,0.00032951968,0.000322759],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00090372283,0.0005498567,0.00055448414,0.00021037429,0.0004788811,0.0002784859,0.0012973858,0.0002527624,0.0013389419],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00043585157,0.0005322584,0.00039263125,0.00035251345,0.0047600553,0.0005225954,0.0005080148,0.0006955431,0.0014244018],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019181364,0.00047812882,0.0982744,0.000064197884,0.0005401309,0.0003000669,0.02220838,0.0000031736147,0.00031782876,0.8473893,0.02351036,0.0067222402],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008584185,0.00024797485,0.06882832,0.0015583005,0.00015850173,0.00014063097,0.0058362763,0.00018757129,0.0035314495,0.030110344,0.88744444,0.0010977575],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004280416,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0045493203,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8639341,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00045948903,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000565492,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997129},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2635700455","doi":"10.21991/c92m3x","title":"Les leçons de Jordan, III : à quelles conditions est-il légitime de déroger aux droits constitutionnels fondamentaux?","year":2017,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.05378333636103678,"score_gpt":0.3759383895990287,"score_spread":0.32215505323799193,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2635700455","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08014443,0.022707961,0.15113321,0.12762648,0.01567791,0.0038485478,0.010619146,0.00089596806,0.5873464],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9762591,0.002736331,0.0031771227,0.0022177792,0.0016341173,0.0007613428,0.0004164828,0.000056304303,0.012741421],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98910904,0.00082967774,0.0020747408,0.0020234946,0.0019259359,0.0040371213],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99137264,0.0013812504,0.0015567899,0.0016920401,0.0022461738,0.0017510821],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020795828,0.0016580472,0.0016856961,0.00069568615,0.03515289,0.0017149625,0.0027565244,0.0012352807,0.0044700606],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0039106696,0.0019485947,0.0013225545,0.000848754,0.122497916,0.004680039,0.0013701665,0.0017686837,0.002615667],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015101691,0.0008771098,0.041771904,0.00010224627,0.000989245,0.0004166509,0.0012820205,0.0025668244,0.0005034431,0.91151404,0.037606042,0.002219466],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0044719465,0.00017945618,0.0057840697,0.0021661338,0.00095637137,0.0016130841,0.014618031,0.0015846599,0.0006259184,0.22337493,0.74212617,0.002499232],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01445505,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012386508,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89611465,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0049747857,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02822841,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996167},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W26480920","doi":"10.1038/ijo.2015.217","title":"Aspectos jurídico procesales del nuevo derecho de la competencia desleal","year":2010,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Revista de derecho de la competencia y la distribución","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Institute of General Medical Sciences; National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases; National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; National Institute on Aging; Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Derecho; Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.009876324487322365,"score_gpt":0.338565991365072,"score_spread":0.32868966687774964,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W26480920","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.87443006,0.007720674,0.012054646,0.0016996932,0.0005486507,0.0014970927,0.0008534199,0.0007404186,0.10045532],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9853866,0.0036738643,0.008553453,0.0003958879,0.0012418212,0.0002540734,0.00009073945,0.000108740314,0.00029482707],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9883758,0.0047972016,0.0013535263,0.001535663,0.0016264649,0.0023113368],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98765224,0.008232533,0.000888044,0.001010242,0.0010521641,0.0011647544],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0063898372,0.0012427957,0.0016177444,0.000350552,0.0025643657,0.0023909751,0.0024307163,0.0012880093,0.00050820585],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0069745686,0.0013033318,0.0007779465,0.0018170013,0.007295099,0.00063210365,0.00065837364,0.003424168,0.00033700548],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014995062,0.00092087756,0.28910547,0.0004699224,0.00043180634,0.000512721,0.0041959407,0.000039786744,0.007931025,0.681799,0.0054745153,0.008968982],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017508334,0.00014698417,0.43017817,0.0013702665,0.00072907243,0.0008008245,0.003913171,0.0008702569,0.0013220176,0.019700892,0.5371592,0.0020583111],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015075856,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017124343,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6620981,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017923998,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007659549,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99894166},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2737900107","doi":"","title":"LA CONSTITUCIONALIDAD Y LA DEMOCRACIA","year":2015,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"PUEBLO CONTINENTE","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Optech (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionality; Humanities; Political science; Democracy; Ideal (ethics); Law; Philosophy; Politics; Supreme court","score_opus":0.04912911007447443,"score_gpt":0.37685578024839494,"score_spread":0.32772667017392054,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2737900107","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16832927,0.0049920958,0.00058197125,0.013184146,0.0016848913,0.00045374606,0.000089074645,0.00018133271,0.8105035],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.991706,0.00084444904,0.00026491954,0.0002642783,0.00056836085,0.000044937617,0.000009238995,0.000015960217,0.0062818476],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961947,0.0012094239,0.00046096605,0.00051740697,0.0010450402,0.00057245156],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99703264,0.0012260816,0.00023983743,0.00026278375,0.0008122633,0.00042641858],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021100442,0.0003560099,0.0005441833,0.00014545185,0.00058265787,0.0004294015,0.000532057,0.00021954533,0.0001678356],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022416369,0.0003508599,0.00021882076,0.00054226577,0.003665033,0.00041084562,0.00033522295,0.0004472864,0.0014072447],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008892819,0.00022866463,0.09947594,0.000023091987,0.00020670712,0.00013144176,0.0050154747,0.000011637895,0.0000632982,0.8535062,0.037583895,0.003664733],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011074468,0.000039275146,0.01705997,0.00023107103,0.00011025614,0.000027416394,0.0039169793,0.00003756985,0.000046770456,0.0042248876,0.97279525,0.00040313049],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005274091,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00044811826,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93521136,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017726228,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001359292,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998943},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2739139083","doi":"10.25247/p1982-999x.2011.v1n2.p%p","title":"Nótulas para uma filosofia jurídico-processual em Tomás de Aquino [Nótulas for a legal and procedural philosophy in Aquinate]","year":2012,"lang":"pt","type":"article","venue":"Americanae (AECID Library)","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Discovery Air (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Humanities","score_opus":0.046311679587044206,"score_gpt":0.3421903788281695,"score_spread":0.2958786992411253,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2739139083","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9552694,0.0077409875,0.00023955017,0.022775805,0.000749267,0.0016065653,0.00020896971,0.00020582546,0.011203636],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9894869,0.0005828222,0.0012478305,0.002669301,0.0015700437,0.00044793583,0.000037881466,0.000066915534,0.0038903982],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99540645,0.00031624333,0.0007820699,0.0009238423,0.0007590441,0.0018123396],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99758244,0.0007736446,0.00046481338,0.00031838138,0.0001322207,0.0007285098],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00048423474,0.0007044016,0.0010323017,0.00041399346,0.0009607331,0.00020547632,0.0007737785,0.00022843672,0.00056361075],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00051610224,0.00072147336,0.00025632503,0.0017660244,0.0027626108,0.003761055,0.00047103743,0.0004963731,0.00011272776],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00065112824,0.0008115916,0.7015763,0.00036855246,0.00035104147,0.000057556517,0.033393003,0.000023177268,0.00023184484,0.18660292,0.067979194,0.007953708],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0031885875,0.0016745079,0.8391611,0.0008048553,0.00038689826,0.000052709256,0.03380972,0.0009687567,0.0012297597,0.010002676,0.1057832,0.002937218],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005682341,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00064833113,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17660025,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027844252,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018251444,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999513},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2757225934","doi":"10.20318/eunomia.2017.3804","title":"La incidencia democrática de la nebulosa obligación de claridad del Dictamen relativo a la secesión del Quebec = Democratic Impact of the vague Obligation of Clarity in the Reference re Secession of Quebec","year":2017,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"EUNOMÍA Revista en Cultura de la Legalidad","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Tribunal; Obligation; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.023101448022894395,"score_gpt":0.3872741607202332,"score_spread":0.3641727126973388,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2757225934","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97183955,0.0014519328,0.00029217542,0.0015560312,0.0000450345,0.0007804893,0.00011443996,0.00002467709,0.023895675],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978296,0.00092001597,0.0005987471,0.000060064038,0.00011057998,0.000055029766,0.000010807356,0.000020366391,0.00039475685],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9850237,0.011493258,0.0012259562,0.0005341188,0.0011226496,0.0006003262],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9908325,0.0053653317,0.0020299158,0.00098064,0.00063545484,0.00015617292],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008393692,0.00051591144,0.0009655996,0.00015068494,0.0012581038,0.00093713275,0.0021918025,0.0007787545,0.000032871798],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008221466,0.0003273413,0.00048810578,0.0008498118,0.0052413875,0.0011504581,0.00052710547,0.0016942606,0.0000042201586],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020242683,0.00037409307,0.6980528,0.0004774081,0.00025853695,0.000042837008,0.07078184,0.00028001892,0.012616895,0.21344018,0.0011712358,0.0023017018],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006631522,0.00008517805,0.97589654,0.00296735,0.00029047794,0.000036881316,0.009998283,0.00027373002,0.00077507173,0.006265057,0.0023873015,0.00036095653],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.19241382,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07050886,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.27784374,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013085915,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0045880163,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99991786},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2758821449","doi":"10.14198/doxa2017.40.08","title":"La filosofía del derecho de Alexandre Kojève","year":2017,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"DOXA Cuadernos de Filosofía del Derecho","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Optech (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Derecho","score_opus":0.06038519638070435,"score_gpt":0.3850644373788855,"score_spread":0.3246792409981812,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2758821449","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.55433905,0.00950991,0.0052588256,0.020930553,0.0023530643,0.0021174774,0.0008952797,0.0006862693,0.40390956],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9812617,0.0066860653,0.0028586006,0.0012349497,0.0022389065,0.0002722042,0.00003610245,0.00011640175,0.0052951123],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99134725,0.0016736608,0.0011538957,0.001678136,0.0017446824,0.0024023626],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9926752,0.0023089733,0.0011784864,0.0018982294,0.00089565647,0.0010434779],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024889114,0.0012113405,0.0013866393,0.00036842946,0.006863283,0.0025432287,0.0036399662,0.0012852479,0.0013596913],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005385776,0.0012904406,0.0008096414,0.00050264644,0.005271697,0.0016311354,0.001284179,0.001968719,0.0020548734],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006467989,0.0017943447,0.553728,0.00066768826,0.002211581,0.0014072725,0.03241671,0.00033989782,0.0014087714,0.22655201,0.12578565,0.0530413],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0043608244,0.0004199233,0.33035317,0.0027558557,0.0011122046,0.0003424516,0.012129051,0.0024624765,0.0028140838,0.064723216,0.5744761,0.0040506064],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0048801745,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030915916,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.44869047,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014541163,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002974655,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995532},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2762486503","doi":"","title":"Entrevista al doctor Pere Vilanova","year":2017,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Perspectiva escolar","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Montenegro; Political science; History; Art; Ancient history","score_opus":0.0437321673461142,"score_gpt":0.4151310212250356,"score_spread":0.3713988538789214,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2762486503","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3194208,0.0062951716,0.00009687056,0.12150736,0.0032108957,0.0011624575,0.00017545566,0.00019339153,0.5479376],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9843315,0.0024540443,0.00007416537,0.00021591509,0.0016044595,0.00003101091,0.0000023841728,0.00001989448,0.01126661],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99685216,0.00025338665,0.0003307599,0.0008344918,0.0010061874,0.0007230407],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99757487,0.0002175337,0.0003923909,0.00093910104,0.0006168683,0.00025922054],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005829161,0.00040573228,0.00056558417,0.00010907241,0.006687785,0.001847661,0.0014084203,0.00013716679,0.0019360506],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019075783,0.00039591553,0.0003167195,0.00018979723,0.0036855487,0.00094765384,0.00060273946,0.00046040106,0.001830143],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000082872386,0.00034995814,0.12756471,0.000040699633,0.00032776507,0.00009907942,0.017874762,0.000002087847,0.000982975,0.8012699,0.050469093,0.0009360745],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00053244113,0.000080363796,0.19362696,0.00023501301,0.00008850049,0.0000050140566,0.01153226,0.000019968968,0.00013619415,0.0011309689,0.79211736,0.00049498753],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003645829,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013207592,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.80013895,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000742519,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007531658,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99984926},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2779743566","doi":"10.4000/books.editionsmsh.10699","title":"Les particularités du constitutionnalisme uruguayen et ses faiblesses institutionnelles","year":2015,"lang":"fr","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Éditions de la Maison des sciences de l’homme eBooks","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec en Outaouais","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Constitution; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.24657069630047226,"score_gpt":0.42674343825713196,"score_spread":0.1801727419566597,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2779743566","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017579965,0.0056860303,0.02438684,0.006939273,0.00096669816,0.0007325034,0.00051987305,0.00034250773,0.9428463],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97189,0.0014773263,0.010341736,0.0007999784,0.0008206951,0.00021367423,0.00004285629,0.00003711108,0.014376671],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9932664,0.0017353453,0.0009532235,0.0011454453,0.0015673972,0.0013322101],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99468637,0.0023440982,0.0005792144,0.00045445366,0.0012170154,0.00071884075],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.004723429,0.0009046892,0.00089306914,0.0005753732,0.011500271,0.001051409,0.0013791255,0.00073734805,0.0017556109],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017390564,0.0009119983,0.0004947957,0.00049615983,0.10867411,0.0010699519,0.00054758496,0.0010468259,0.0003894456],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020585172,0.00015633005,0.0032528308,0.000072315175,0.00018363267,0.0001804716,0.007420495,0.0033247736,0.000054783515,0.9771426,0.0066981395,0.0014930827],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00041245957,0.00016241612,0.00081034616,0.0009838556,0.00029239774,0.0004221711,0.005851072,0.00039170258,0.000068003865,0.47312304,0.51660794,0.000874553],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030496384,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0065430915,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95431,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021035376,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0066809314,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999856},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2791516439","doi":"","title":"The Quantitative Tactics Used to Delegitimize a Right to the City Social Justice Movement in Bogotá, Colombia","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alternate routes","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Movement (music); Social justice; Political science; Sociology; Law; Law and economics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.07993507558470733,"score_gpt":0.40827134965901696,"score_spread":0.32833627407430965,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2791516439","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8848055,0.00013162613,0.0027309002,0.07792573,0.0017182145,0.0011521971,0.000038047358,0.00005104094,0.03144677],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9950573,0.000044679873,0.000534945,0.002439798,0.0007004405,0.00013811236,7.041716e-7,0.000005945417,0.0010780665],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981325,0.0003404992,0.00024575304,0.0002651147,0.00057017326,0.00044592808],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978659,0.0013661628,0.00009958621,0.00015054709,0.0004279185,0.000089848145],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010487812,0.00013701318,0.00017558488,0.00005153505,0.002724422,0.00024568982,0.0006420876,0.00003223899,0.000056502566],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012497694,0.00008868204,0.000053780816,0.00053158245,0.0008590132,0.00017470922,0.00025144112,0.00014333379,0.00026461165],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021214741,0.000101592595,0.0121434145,0.0000036821416,0.00013259768,0.000012681729,0.15516467,0.00009911209,0.00020570269,0.79726505,0.03359408,0.0010652626],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007831044,0.0003887508,0.08614872,0.000080357335,0.00011318955,7.456728e-7,0.059600066,0.00039805422,0.0015747637,0.029065248,0.82128185,0.0005651485],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006267188,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.19267814,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7876878,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030399224,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002051368,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985739},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2794104303","doi":"10.7202/1043464ar","title":"REVUE DE LA JURISPRUDENCE 2015 EN DROIT MUNICIPAL","year":2016,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue du notariat","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ministry of Labour, Employment and Social Solidarity","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Political science; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.020401463457100893,"score_gpt":0.3349545461673124,"score_spread":0.31455308271021154,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2794104303","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.46371132,0.03281756,0.013261729,0.3428017,0.010337148,0.0010464429,0.0002650812,0.00029624984,0.13546278],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93779886,0.009928228,0.0015567461,0.00021017948,0.0048417165,0.00006067754,0.0000020360415,0.000024685376,0.04557687],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962373,0.0013746243,0.0004946907,0.0006214973,0.00041983902,0.0008520411],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953475,0.0033455924,0.00024405029,0.00047077972,0.0002800127,0.00031208544],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022658077,0.0003399385,0.000530119,0.000106857515,0.0007080943,0.00010407645,0.0008970469,0.00036252596,0.0010154007],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026562994,0.00031926075,0.00025902226,0.00055747095,0.0027167792,0.00066306983,0.00040095783,0.00042726076,0.0021481572],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042757114,0.00018042927,0.0330568,0.0000754592,0.00012955254,0.00017241602,0.019799702,0.00009334676,0.00057926454,0.9193317,0.01726102,0.009277512],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00055407453,0.00008451626,0.032735072,0.0015045445,0.0001525506,0.00010605827,0.0016168371,0.00022760668,0.00009451052,0.029858695,0.932488,0.0005775145],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037046093,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004574345,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.915227,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015353978,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00079411635,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99999726},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2821155027","doi":"10.5380/pr_eleitoral.v3i3.42805","title":"Las sentencias judiciales comos actos correctores del sistema democrático","year":2014,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Paraná Eleitoral revista brasileira de direito eleitoral e ciência política","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Encana (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.029954846405558656,"score_gpt":0.34723276643516693,"score_spread":0.31727792002960825,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2821155027","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94211435,0.008285133,0.0020866517,0.0029692953,0.00742589,0.0027906664,0.00046983754,0.0009782297,0.03287995],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98453766,0.00079932547,0.000677457,0.0011529375,0.0111380005,0.0002761864,0.00009139025,0.0002016776,0.001125355],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98450434,0.003634199,0.0025684824,0.002353127,0.0033952778,0.0035445595],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98972875,0.0036294383,0.0015368207,0.0016102837,0.0016962171,0.0017985073],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00295979,0.0020369852,0.0031840643,0.0006049399,0.0036156732,0.0020266739,0.0027152281,0.000992376,0.00046808177],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007307678,0.0020934863,0.0013960839,0.002269289,0.004912075,0.0011939165,0.00077404024,0.0016534311,0.0019176758],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005236746,0.00086006016,0.6751254,0.0005977402,0.000607096,0.00012274513,0.0014227855,0.00005247287,0.0021734415,0.28134382,0.02974945,0.0074213087],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002308218,0.00082964444,0.55086285,0.0027282997,0.0013775624,0.00007414827,0.0019195399,0.0018040258,0.0010461464,0.0012492662,0.43215084,0.0036494883],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0045900224,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002305995,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4024014,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017630082,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026162232,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99923724},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2885365491","doi":"10.18542/hendu.v7i1.6012","title":"Importação, Exportação e Consenso Regional na Corte Interamericana de Direitos Humanos","year":2018,"lang":"pt","type":"article","venue":"Hendu – Revista Latino-Americana de Direitos Humanos","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Intertek (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Human rights; Political science; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.09056744566287066,"score_gpt":0.3890171782875237,"score_spread":0.298449732624653,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2885365491","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8626248,0.0073054032,0.004625581,0.0056168595,0.0029468925,0.0043424806,0.0007991681,0.0011167219,0.11062204],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9779278,0.0014684282,0.0008181434,0.004143127,0.003343022,0.0003381812,0.00011225244,0.000167634,0.011681392],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9873114,0.002070974,0.002654962,0.0024605435,0.0023810233,0.0031210461],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99090654,0.0017081111,0.0026392923,0.0016973161,0.0015319826,0.0015167447],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014491284,0.0016364,0.0024922783,0.0006366695,0.004564054,0.00080478564,0.0021031604,0.0004662712,0.004998358],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019586002,0.0017779092,0.0010756586,0.0022182895,0.01459052,0.00067312416,0.0007309393,0.0015091803,0.0008863619],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00064713357,0.0014310519,0.38340768,0.0004972371,0.0027457792,0.001466439,0.07701235,0.000029189629,0.006094202,0.120987944,0.3859263,0.019754695],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020925978,0.0017424759,0.16979666,0.0023044932,0.0013057101,0.00025856568,0.048568793,0.0016125762,0.0006936653,0.0012057414,0.76567453,0.0047441623],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013425852,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0059435125,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.37974826,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018761978,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004718951,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998916},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2886761854","doi":"","title":"Régimen Jurídico de la Tecnología","year":2001,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Revista de derecho y ciencias penales: Ciencias Sociales y Políticas","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Optech (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.05794881691201879,"score_gpt":0.39635961701410205,"score_spread":0.33841080010208324,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2886761854","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.63940513,0.014486952,0.0061272355,0.0076571754,0.00064269576,0.001659618,0.0001614633,0.0006568888,0.32920286],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9768514,0.015186404,0.00205127,0.0014755119,0.0016419134,0.00014290186,0.000012581326,0.00008094412,0.0025570407],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9875727,0.0036059096,0.0014429097,0.0017001674,0.00244177,0.0032365315],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99210125,0.003961852,0.0009425659,0.0009022637,0.0009748768,0.0011171899],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.008182586,0.0011007101,0.0015132109,0.00069220416,0.0051111854,0.0020787634,0.0027107846,0.0010063141,0.00082499604],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009002207,0.0011590716,0.0009160137,0.0041818167,0.015434039,0.0010089788,0.00077646493,0.0015134234,0.0010675779],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010604672,0.0011361578,0.08496107,0.00017771502,0.00036137283,0.0006715747,0.026210967,0.00004269347,0.0025976729,0.8542079,0.01058664,0.018940188],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016685089,0.00037223366,0.18402195,0.0012001394,0.0009135199,0.0006362381,0.04107158,0.00035606584,0.0005602235,0.03165961,0.7346937,0.0028462133],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015356535,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00045083262,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8225483,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005823515,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012312222,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997102},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2891085224","doi":"10.7202/1067015ar","title":"Entre théories et pratiques : la nature, sujet de droit dans la constitution équatorienne, considérations critiques sur une vieille antienne","year":2020,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue québécoise de droit international","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.01619906769008311,"score_gpt":0.3133602146104657,"score_spread":0.2971611469203826,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2891085224","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14683071,0.00396519,0.022692742,0.101562515,0.0021658186,0.0006628777,0.0012445112,0.00033380708,0.72054183],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98617554,0.004277131,0.001861528,0.0026861564,0.0012637207,0.00010395737,0.00017810042,0.00002639067,0.0034274824],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.996402,0.00095967884,0.00070420903,0.0006785626,0.00066936313,0.00058615516],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99598825,0.0018502441,0.00037392712,0.0002075559,0.0012000037,0.00038000132],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010215073,0.0004021179,0.00052228605,0.00014885498,0.00063140964,0.00039749334,0.00064161955,0.00048079243,0.00036669365],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0038872596,0.0005238778,0.00028328696,0.000750736,0.0032672244,0.0013141186,0.00016210377,0.0009901545,0.000086655076],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006287896,0.00027957698,0.009931111,0.00009057145,0.0002912156,0.0002680181,0.041293908,0.00031602252,0.0003956785,0.9369008,0.009629982,0.000540262],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00065684674,0.00012811317,0.008652924,0.0008050557,0.00018577698,0.00028501946,0.017094178,0.002573389,0.00085973274,0.14335956,0.8246729,0.00072652346],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0075243246,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.062977895,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83934486,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013791537,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0049559795,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997213},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2897141440","doi":"","title":"El derecho a la vida en el caso Nadege Dorzema et al V República Dominicana","year":2013,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Revue québécoise de droit international","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Derecho; Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02116809678202996,"score_gpt":0.35879775572608347,"score_spread":0.3376296589440535,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2897141440","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.42060012,0.0005731995,0.0006669972,0.100040965,0.0015641417,0.0008048169,0.00025002888,0.00014299272,0.47535673],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9862468,0.0022972187,0.0006849098,0.005614636,0.00094645657,0.00028885307,0.000038365582,0.00003282648,0.0038499006],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99606264,0.00068383914,0.0007745798,0.00081037096,0.0010293503,0.0006392315],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9956324,0.0023384222,0.00044751214,0.00040512945,0.0008276992,0.00034885452],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013878067,0.0004006202,0.0005377427,0.00030700458,0.00047112317,0.0005365302,0.001251548,0.000242084,0.0014561171],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024043259,0.0004578147,0.00038109245,0.00044835432,0.0010719873,0.0008198107,0.00032850573,0.0006806107,0.0011856412],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007059895,0.0003290237,0.016156042,0.00003182471,0.00047938092,0.00010102797,0.008505904,0.0000615429,0.0004787557,0.9271656,0.041642554,0.004977716],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00078006135,0.000076588774,0.10400975,0.0005300773,0.000075931566,0.00015501727,0.0021980263,0.000985508,0.000063016574,0.026389532,0.864118,0.00061850285],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03420556,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017069204,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9007761,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001434098,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018323465,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99978733},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2898901904","doi":"","title":"Justicia constitucional y derechos fundamentales del pueblo y el Estado de Quebec: a propósito del \"Asunto Henderson\"","year":2018,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Sistema: revista de ciencias sociales","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; State (computer science); Derecho; Tribunal; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.07759916354918436,"score_gpt":0.3751698489931104,"score_spread":0.29757068544392606,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2898901904","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.86284804,0.0202471,0.013016854,0.0070874137,0.0021194087,0.003390519,0.0005619488,0.0005599216,0.090168804],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9901096,0.0009848829,0.0019680539,0.0009982522,0.0031989003,0.00020958294,0.000022403772,0.00005632674,0.0024519952],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99144584,0.0016423073,0.0013013273,0.0014250955,0.0020747792,0.0021106247],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9947387,0.0013541556,0.00090369995,0.00056222116,0.0017233168,0.0007179272],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033362876,0.0009372456,0.0013649283,0.00035868495,0.006197755,0.0014480347,0.0014623111,0.000552105,0.0003895812],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033735964,0.00096974504,0.00073112303,0.001685627,0.019350182,0.00087097293,0.0005817457,0.0006647562,0.0007412011],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013228321,0.00065378856,0.1098991,0.0007099165,0.00048453425,0.00009642932,0.02935117,0.000012525835,0.0012146485,0.8434409,0.010917029,0.0030876545],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003712528,0.0008898181,0.24416572,0.0075798533,0.0032659052,0.00023075876,0.27402753,0.00093049585,0.0012143248,0.025832469,0.43220794,0.005942676],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008711382,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.040135704,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8176085,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00599725,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015496945,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99958855},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2907736897","doi":"","title":"El derecho a la identidad cultural de los pueblos indígenas de América. Estudio de derecho comparado: Canadá y México","year":2008,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Dialnet (Universidad de la Rioja)","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Derecho; Context (archaeology); Identity (music); Cartography; Political science; Sociology; Philosophy; Geography","score_opus":0.03026477074690407,"score_gpt":0.34356631476669375,"score_spread":0.31330154401978966,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2907736897","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8991756,0.001522062,0.0019206388,0.0019713428,0.00033127973,0.00058694097,0.00012141746,0.00020066461,0.09417004],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98961234,0.0057544773,0.0015516056,0.0005159924,0.0006265677,0.000046395966,0.000018350618,0.000039891722,0.0018343541],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99356306,0.0023363992,0.00046208885,0.0008294627,0.0010415533,0.0017674303],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99605656,0.0017839384,0.00040544636,0.00041978384,0.00043901367,0.00089525944],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012435446,0.0006656399,0.0008961912,0.0004387389,0.002947744,0.00043961641,0.0013243413,0.00059805275,0.00019677264],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008460863,0.0007583044,0.0004487234,0.0016524873,0.0042782053,0.0008888144,0.0004349431,0.001110701,0.00019336159],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019890098,0.0006193636,0.73418283,0.000097041964,0.00088264496,0.0026235837,0.073734075,0.00066815544,0.0012141251,0.13598922,0.04790732,0.0018827601],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019455097,0.00010255787,0.8458765,0.00032485605,0.00040195734,0.00043000805,0.028240414,0.00071929314,0.00042464383,0.0032419327,0.117157884,0.0011344455],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.041670963,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.044998802,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13274728,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003648529,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005382493,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994868},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2908946625","doi":"","title":"Derecho Internacional Público","year":2016,"lang":"pt","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Bourgeoisie; Decolonization; Politics; China; Quarter (Canadian coin); Cultural revolution; Political science; Economic history; Political economy; History; Development economics; Economy; Law; Sociology; Economics","score_opus":0.09008762961630809,"score_gpt":0.3883331898214233,"score_spread":0.29824556020511517,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2908946625","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00009922556,0.0013697948,0.0043664905,0.012112822,0.0035040472,0.00050842896,0.00015131944,0.00015022709,0.97773767],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.04293143,0.0016643428,0.000093235634,0.0006017108,0.002537663,0.00005266102,0.000014726421,0.000023286942,0.95208097],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.996016,0.000297038,0.00062610593,0.0008766016,0.0014474385,0.0007368144],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99703646,0.0011756786,0.00036265765,0.00034468196,0.0007745658,0.00030598493],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006245326,0.0005929618,0.00073187426,0.0002739413,0.0011979275,0.00015759442,0.0011408653,0.00043417126,0.025622144],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00043469624,0.00044342942,0.00046456038,0.0002269839,0.0037707076,0.00040056542,0.00066662015,0.00050355913,0.01789962],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019647505,0.000040257604,0.0008956916,0.000012921062,0.00023121323,0.000014144205,0.0016318072,2.007593e-7,0.000010054528,0.6489222,0.34392527,0.0042966],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026993075,0.000052442138,0.00056425453,0.00063710695,0.000062588406,0.0000052701466,0.0013969301,0.0000029048397,0.00002212005,0.024192533,0.97215414,0.0006397769],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00023190386,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0039352872,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.62822884,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012419581,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032527123,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99980175},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W29106938","doi":"10.1016/j.marpolbul.2017.10.014","title":"La Justicia, bajo el dominio de un poder político desmedido y sordo","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Diario La Ley","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.025139774980834678,"score_gpt":0.3833726440211082,"score_spread":0.3582328690402735,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W29106938","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.54343885,0.0023056974,0.004443762,0.003183705,0.0011686174,0.00025603428,0.000017320952,0.0001464746,0.4450395],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969531,0.00015957259,0.00092271675,0.0004182875,0.000801783,0.000049788043,0.0000025722672,0.000009676126,0.00068247673],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981251,0.0005165556,0.00017311635,0.000183681,0.0003975162,0.00060407445],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981837,0.0012622284,0.00006664905,0.00013727033,0.000111165406,0.00023896611],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013384933,0.00014750662,0.00020220934,0.000067218505,0.0006825454,0.00007886777,0.00026989376,0.00013991052,0.00040587722],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011989292,0.00014083784,0.000085149135,0.00023195535,0.0012841184,0.00032354763,0.00011601243,0.00025198096,0.0003641186],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001587386,0.0001587238,0.26661304,0.000007141188,0.000067061665,0.000012482322,0.037519988,0.000009133721,0.00007393412,0.68187153,0.0056231585,0.008027908],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004476199,0.000013123875,0.46519858,0.000045138084,0.00010379613,0.0000081509515,0.008435469,0.000015614502,0.00019099214,0.010998253,0.51418084,0.00036238952],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017620826,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018626362,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6708733,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019640216,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005618879,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5743201},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2913200168","doi":"10.7202/1055495ar","title":"Límites en el ejercicio del control de convencionalidad y aplicación de estándares internacionales por tribunales estatales: El caso peruano","year":2019,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Tribunal; Political science; Art; Law","score_opus":0.014206607929560296,"score_gpt":0.3194315187021496,"score_spread":0.3052249107725893,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2913200168","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97261775,0.0062959455,0.002202689,0.0058569433,0.0005314098,0.0011639365,0.0010992927,0.00017734783,0.010054668],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9915725,0.0035322886,0.0005493392,0.0006487655,0.0011616583,0.00020502807,0.00008065177,0.000057208068,0.002192574],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9947528,0.000867992,0.0009070312,0.001035943,0.0009245158,0.001511706],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9945633,0.0031520291,0.0005385625,0.00057774066,0.0006146735,0.0005536838],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018578282,0.0005767337,0.0011537038,0.000311413,0.0007946471,0.00032471088,0.0013404266,0.0004229613,0.00050112006],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016721447,0.00076291827,0.00065212214,0.0005458931,0.001834944,0.00059418136,0.00025746692,0.0007457075,0.0010837003],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027095884,0.00033140986,0.60153913,0.00031752296,0.0004534274,0.00022041803,0.011622979,0.00062945613,0.0037402688,0.37920302,0.00070642005,0.000965014],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004931242,0.00064859714,0.80294394,0.0040275776,0.00091777416,0.0008191995,0.0296012,0.0053353324,0.0020855942,0.09087948,0.054989487,0.0028205828],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017216227,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011192863,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28832352,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022308545,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024530466,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99969405},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2913908320","doi":"10.7202/1055494ar","title":"La jurisprudencia de la Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos como fuente de derecho. Una revisión de la doctrina del “control de convencionalidad”","year":2019,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.01073277403643461,"score_gpt":0.3271572615737502,"score_spread":0.31642448753731556,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2913908320","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9221834,0.004065804,0.012252873,0.0017819658,0.00024498074,0.0011414342,0.00015773496,0.00021953521,0.0579523],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98723084,0.006488712,0.0024612877,0.0015476086,0.00066162774,0.00023892782,0.000015087107,0.00007590371,0.0012799874],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99047524,0.0047154883,0.0009572404,0.0010124678,0.0007563184,0.0020832326],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99153364,0.0058257394,0.0007375395,0.00067966996,0.00040684306,0.0008165485],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005397439,0.00064640597,0.0012545467,0.00033145508,0.00096181233,0.0006719767,0.0015765888,0.0007506411,0.00039486328],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002053192,0.00089903484,0.00067969155,0.00086170825,0.0028158284,0.00044459087,0.0002830418,0.0018046582,0.00039968456],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00030953312,0.0005235139,0.76700586,0.0006032347,0.00068145787,0.0007376919,0.012497151,0.0006289432,0.006332118,0.20338582,0.0023486358,0.004946068],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0049413904,0.0004922969,0.75618535,0.0073244725,0.0011655755,0.002182595,0.0077100666,0.0048040445,0.0026833275,0.09668495,0.11316465,0.0026612703],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0043286397,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00056082767,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11081601,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0051061516,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0046067154,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99989796},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2914727888","doi":"10.7202/1055492ar","title":"Mexico’s Relationship with the Inter-American Court of Human Rights: Success or Failure?","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Government (linguistics); Political science; Order (exchange); Relation (database); Law; Fundamental rights; Business; Computer science","score_opus":0.025649938168111317,"score_gpt":0.31765943650283723,"score_spread":0.2920094983347259,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2914727888","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91777843,0.000043850105,0.0005689886,0.00612844,0.000069353075,0.0003781193,0.00000998992,0.00004057277,0.07498227],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99543107,0.0000056502413,0.00024294661,0.00005766677,0.0001148844,0.000031429176,0.000003136658,0.0000060903553,0.0041071055],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989053,0.00018136224,0.00018852073,0.00020016142,0.00028028787,0.00024434642],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99877477,0.0005237052,0.00020805169,0.00023959568,0.00019447568,0.00005942146],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00044365678,0.00008573024,0.00024540292,0.00006557927,0.00062112906,0.000044338052,0.00042369243,0.000034553257,0.00023092965],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000097564625,0.0000695216,0.00006398778,0.0005014479,0.0014758189,0.0001978204,0.000054022734,0.00017796461,0.00007522854],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003750835,0.000040844567,0.46556106,0.000019190737,0.00005347126,0.000006117593,0.0077347993,0.000049572973,0.000072996154,0.5242875,0.0020597714,0.00007711719],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011531484,0.0008226871,0.75170696,0.00084235927,0.00021106246,0.000035110683,0.038373925,0.00011404944,0.00080597936,0.06243759,0.14258215,0.00091497676],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024051156,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05575952,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.46184996,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019569001,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017239466,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9614704},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2914986013","doi":"","title":"Escrito de amicus curiae presentado ante la corte interamericana de derechos humanos","year":2013,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Revue québécoise de droit international","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.018249590113881286,"score_gpt":0.32686944853060623,"score_spread":0.30861985841672496,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2914986013","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7525433,0.00066941587,0.0058324076,0.011238007,0.0015358226,0.0008414746,0.00018413161,0.00016346571,0.22699201],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98957664,0.0019034874,0.0011599375,0.00093658443,0.0015408397,0.0002540216,0.000026615644,0.000033479595,0.004568399],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967977,0.00049535546,0.00062183413,0.00060847803,0.0006667173,0.00080994854],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973988,0.0009103718,0.0003868304,0.00030199144,0.00064028124,0.0003617459],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005767851,0.00036817827,0.00046363383,0.00027445363,0.00051550503,0.00064835435,0.001251461,0.0001945077,0.0012452762],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011226581,0.00044273675,0.00032653284,0.00033903474,0.0014104178,0.0006537844,0.0002703967,0.0005891848,0.00066092314],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014588982,0.0009673459,0.21034123,0.00014397672,0.0012095007,0.00031412108,0.027017472,0.00027067686,0.007024533,0.7141541,0.021978687,0.016432421],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013113138,0.00021359048,0.29818004,0.0018976796,0.0002622335,0.00033807202,0.008998356,0.009697668,0.00092456595,0.07266464,0.6040896,0.0014222309],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.058621462,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009299339,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6414895,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022572204,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014804377,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998024},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2915033244","doi":"10.7202/1055488ar","title":"L’accord de paix en Colombie à la lumière du droit international interaméricain","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Art","score_opus":0.014759708509637787,"score_gpt":0.2877000523076343,"score_spread":0.2729403437979965,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2915033244","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.59437734,0.0013178309,0.0014221721,0.021964306,0.0031822845,0.00045931878,0.00007938547,0.00009285403,0.3771045],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9438888,0.002014136,0.0009154236,0.00054007006,0.0016858961,0.000067322246,0.000019129084,0.000024075329,0.050845154],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99715424,0.00061185687,0.0004689699,0.00055082917,0.00046428703,0.0007498265],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976161,0.0013392182,0.00024388162,0.00027654463,0.00028240084,0.00024183586],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001433502,0.0002382763,0.0004692486,0.0001505842,0.00029585633,0.00019294207,0.00093566254,0.0002806991,0.0015879256],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008246665,0.00037808385,0.00030429472,0.0005224954,0.0010567454,0.00053750206,0.00030934546,0.0005613701,0.0021488613],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005082532,0.00022588024,0.17399491,0.00007817194,0.0002182311,0.00013366563,0.009254245,0.00021550327,0.00022777998,0.7992497,0.0074857734,0.008865327],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009734413,0.00018741265,0.095234126,0.0009741757,0.00012649303,0.00024615575,0.0086243935,0.0042708814,0.00011623107,0.12967277,0.75874794,0.00082599255],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010806622,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014693099,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7512622,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021838364,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006529638,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998671},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W293941256","doi":"","title":"Política judicial en la Venezuela post-Chávez","year":2014,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Revista \"Cuadernos Manuel Giménez Abad\"","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Presidential system; Sanctions; Opposition (politics); Political science; Politics; Law; Supreme court; Constitutional court; Quarter (Canadian coin); Constitution; History","score_opus":0.014534981523918017,"score_gpt":0.33261201556002895,"score_spread":0.31807703403611093,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W293941256","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22661754,0.01563478,0.004980896,0.047941078,0.003564575,0.0028291794,0.00047000273,0.0007663525,0.6971956],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98995924,0.0030665488,0.00026699423,0.00087772176,0.0024710265,0.00006674543,0.0000318848,0.000054677857,0.0032051397],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99254906,0.0023334494,0.0010102433,0.0011895421,0.0016624914,0.0012552089],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9949476,0.002526145,0.0005703702,0.00078735844,0.00066990586,0.00049863145],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.002345363,0.0007876165,0.0012079101,0.0002890451,0.0016954675,0.0010450045,0.0013602403,0.00045415334,0.0005730992],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033281469,0.000807507,0.00060568214,0.000812343,0.0050928937,0.00058314606,0.00063729286,0.0008892768,0.0032083075],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000107853506,0.0003624247,0.010019714,0.0003362193,0.00031605407,0.00007161372,0.0057332893,0.000016224622,0.0005888637,0.95698774,0.009667773,0.015792238],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000747784,0.0002698621,0.06457153,0.00088546023,0.0003702508,0.000022944185,0.0021955993,0.00008731725,0.00009546006,0.004105297,0.9256302,0.0010182605],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000548278,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00018042742,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9528824,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00048591156,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008577931,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999992},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2953712355","doi":"10.18601/16577558.n30.04","title":"Canadá y la crisis de Venezuela","year":2019,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"OASIS","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"St. Francis Xavier University","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Art","score_opus":0.016491308341627164,"score_gpt":0.3553192005076725,"score_spread":0.33882789216604536,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2953712355","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.55901545,0.0011884402,0.00003512805,0.009634769,0.0006654388,0.00018957484,0.000035462108,0.000041597865,0.42919412],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99429405,0.0011590251,0.0001474639,0.0003713926,0.0002481279,0.000015181307,0.0000014848805,0.000008416059,0.0037548423],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99833316,0.00031946326,0.0001679428,0.0003006051,0.00045072095,0.00042813562],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99900013,0.0004191432,0.00008386208,0.00020372913,0.0001485912,0.00014455916],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00052378135,0.00015757093,0.0002663574,0.00007663715,0.00043949284,0.00015054285,0.00032691128,0.00010896896,0.0011251271],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001914482,0.00016226969,0.00012829305,0.0004155651,0.00049184513,0.00016636269,0.00011992233,0.00016905571,0.0017968523],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030636227,0.00012544858,0.4140437,0.00006448682,0.00027409932,0.00003721563,0.016434038,0.00008440019,0.00026857742,0.48971283,0.07142039,0.0075041545],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019524526,0.000034163535,0.12187415,0.00009466815,0.00006757085,0.0000026664834,0.010701136,0.000022851142,0.00019097503,0.0017110945,0.86485034,0.00025515657],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0155961625,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006936156,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7934299,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00036366677,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000981931,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999788},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2958725854","doi":"10.12804/revistas.urosario.edu.co/sociojuridicos/a.7543","title":"Jurisdicción especial indígena, derecho colombiano y normativa internacional: la necesidad de un equilibrio en el marco de la extracción de minerales y el impacto de género.","year":2019,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Estudios Socio-Jurídicos","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Geography; Philosophy","score_opus":0.010445986032402835,"score_gpt":0.35713210267021195,"score_spread":0.3466861166378091,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2958725854","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9572237,0.0032427104,0.0011431858,0.0073062032,0.0007148249,0.0012774016,0.00018157809,0.0002852252,0.028625136],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9893081,0.003982566,0.0018746984,0.00080390973,0.0022779673,0.00027100142,0.000021286924,0.00010449322,0.0013559358],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9892181,0.004784713,0.0010930854,0.0010719934,0.0015259152,0.0023061838],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99163586,0.005832818,0.0007299399,0.00057220634,0.00040826033,0.00082091114],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0045552463,0.001033393,0.0013314815,0.0003857508,0.001550406,0.0007494787,0.0018250066,0.0010387882,0.00093216734],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019542107,0.0010892063,0.00073861197,0.000909046,0.0030959207,0.0010707699,0.0010501021,0.0018008406,0.00076056214],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004190631,0.0010534147,0.7912357,0.00020078957,0.0011344793,0.00026996632,0.09026432,0.00016512291,0.0071684695,0.08638102,0.015928634,0.00577902],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0029250626,0.0004194594,0.8945105,0.0009038908,0.0004566631,0.00020844754,0.019993953,0.00037188997,0.001840205,0.014399081,0.062300753,0.0016700573],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021580409,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009872697,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10327484,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004314218,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005679821,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999811},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2978029557","doi":"10.31672/55.8","title":"LOS ACTOS DE LOS GOBIERNOS DEPARTAMENTALES Y SU CONTROL POR LOS MECANISMOS DE GOBIERNO DIRECTO","year":2019,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"revista de derecho público","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Optech (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.019239750598205943,"score_gpt":0.3498415249561466,"score_spread":0.3306017743579407,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2978029557","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9129211,0.012550119,0.0027856769,0.0033444858,0.00058913935,0.003770067,0.0012860649,0.0003801804,0.06237322],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9900719,0.0032861666,0.0005126659,0.0016650927,0.0007355043,0.00029081551,0.000035949335,0.00008557179,0.0033163202],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99249184,0.0018593079,0.0010546871,0.0012368513,0.0012922045,0.0020651114],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99515486,0.0019281954,0.00071903033,0.00084280147,0.0005031341,0.0008519725],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.002262368,0.0009067809,0.001468228,0.00030665923,0.0011626708,0.0014666558,0.0014048741,0.00050994084,0.0019213705],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014198427,0.00093358156,0.000678913,0.001043739,0.0015168451,0.00069228123,0.00033281549,0.0008793936,0.0014170564],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00042146049,0.0009870575,0.6963073,0.0009147956,0.0013552549,0.00021047947,0.003922318,0.000081260216,0.02349169,0.24597323,0.01888907,0.007446062],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0033222493,0.00032280086,0.11893645,0.0023147846,0.0008650329,0.00011636396,0.0038331756,0.000726902,0.0036353942,0.0017244311,0.86221,0.0019924233],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012441715,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008403229,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8433209,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003118552,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031042579,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995699},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2978217647","doi":"","title":"El Sentido Histórico de la Institución del Ombudsman: Orígenes","year":2019,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Sapienza Organizacional","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; State (computer science); Law; Democracy; Economic Justice; Institution; Human rights; Public administration; Politics","score_opus":0.013187375170970185,"score_gpt":0.3314086244275566,"score_spread":0.3182212492565864,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2978217647","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9015843,0.0037052012,0.00047179742,0.0038274718,0.002468256,0.0005264238,0.00011260768,0.00019269652,0.08711121],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9924676,0.0011385451,0.00071720814,0.0006936552,0.0011859348,0.000017628941,0.00002289684,0.000042353367,0.0037141885],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99592346,0.00060571916,0.00051766844,0.00081086607,0.0012801188,0.0008621395],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99760467,0.0007845181,0.0002594405,0.00039176372,0.00064478366,0.00031480248],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010780006,0.00048461946,0.00056465226,0.00024372793,0.0013322151,0.000253945,0.00076147274,0.0003386005,0.0041325013],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00065862486,0.00049622566,0.00022042007,0.0013562841,0.0024091217,0.0005478289,0.0005292243,0.00049975084,0.006699097],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041631058,0.00029889547,0.32111883,0.000045102668,0.00016981745,0.000032045293,0.0051803696,0.00008234951,0.0023145,0.6640501,0.006080833,0.0005855098],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011236605,0.00010453825,0.3045958,0.00022068639,0.0001278724,0.000058075657,0.0049592154,0.000091469665,0.0008319756,0.0061673364,0.6808389,0.0008804792],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00037008763,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001612717,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6747581,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00082108215,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026276852,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99996793},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2982482568","doi":"10.4000/bifea.10314","title":"La autonomía indígena «tutelada» en Bolivia","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Bulletin de l’Institut français d’études andines","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Art","score_opus":0.015308586190653593,"score_gpt":0.28455391779967953,"score_spread":0.2692453316090259,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2982482568","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.44132432,0.03412925,0.00054211693,0.026630634,0.0051340917,0.0010506252,0.000105293235,0.00025685117,0.49082682],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95820504,0.006163223,0.0018050582,0.0009370196,0.0017237993,0.000103546976,0.000013340566,0.000041072857,0.031007905],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9955611,0.0007558073,0.0007105241,0.00090645306,0.0008709096,0.0011951854],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972755,0.0012684057,0.000274437,0.0004760946,0.00032694943,0.00037867046],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015677919,0.00067283417,0.0008842519,0.00022093208,0.0011978634,0.00032153938,0.00097053766,0.0006019788,0.011514279],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005650479,0.00068228674,0.00041282413,0.000738005,0.0035603535,0.0003989388,0.0004718031,0.0008037296,0.008469283],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008323782,0.0004793307,0.10175513,0.00025980602,0.00038698714,0.00016055012,0.016808964,0.0007148611,0.00016160171,0.8120961,0.057635225,0.009458184],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008438498,0.00011322346,0.056721374,0.0005614733,0.00013600789,0.000058830345,0.0033007714,0.00010145327,0.000067029636,0.0006827474,0.9366442,0.00076901424],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008235274,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004060641,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.879009,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00057353784,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012549184,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99956286},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2996244861","doi":"10.21501/23394536.3481","title":"La responsabilidad internacional de los estados","year":2019,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Summa Iuris","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Optech (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.017990542404647616,"score_gpt":0.3738635601137221,"score_spread":0.35587301770907454,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2996244861","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8105391,0.00095500285,0.00009983488,0.0033457507,0.00080216705,0.00036920028,0.00008721993,0.00006988209,0.18373182],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98834366,0.00062887475,0.0002026516,0.0001734357,0.00039676842,0.00002996864,0.0000038664807,0.000014727845,0.0102060735],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99692583,0.000961422,0.00032727758,0.0004815329,0.00074816553,0.00055576564],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99752337,0.0016123077,0.00014696266,0.00030642794,0.00023340725,0.000177513],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001326324,0.00026130822,0.00035768366,0.00015098274,0.00038985367,0.0002145935,0.0005752353,0.0001942514,0.0018998372],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00072119787,0.00025867857,0.00022345825,0.00044225514,0.001600763,0.00030797586,0.0002986844,0.00042350078,0.003252088],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003186398,0.0002618747,0.52428454,0.00009303679,0.00018439896,0.00006478991,0.011879232,0.00003540594,0.0007398947,0.4434932,0.010858091,0.0077868933],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00056005915,0.00012740058,0.14762957,0.00049072993,0.000048727532,0.000009656786,0.008082676,0.000088774636,0.00037267178,0.004238373,0.8379036,0.00044773074],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00054202846,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00046607776,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.82704556,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00048677786,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010078694,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999865},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2997694682","doi":"","title":"Introducción al dossier: Pensando El Derecho en Clave Pro-Fémina","year":2017,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Repositorio Digital Institucional de la Universidad de Buenos Aires (Universidad de Buenos Aires)","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries; York University","keywords":"Derecho; Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.014361780680139156,"score_gpt":0.338524743516827,"score_spread":0.32416296283668783,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2997694682","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6110287,0.0015248497,0.0009755329,0.013691399,0.0020475527,0.0012728961,0.0004344291,0.0004310015,0.3685937],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9834429,0.0025034312,0.0008531447,0.00029227222,0.002795533,0.000030232175,0.000055202545,0.00010226529,0.009924992],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99153984,0.0010018983,0.00090681994,0.0020309533,0.002249737,0.002270771],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9925398,0.0018585221,0.0013479682,0.0016593174,0.0011996219,0.0013947254],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012991817,0.0012490343,0.0013533173,0.0013142515,0.010495574,0.009389846,0.003664205,0.0011775084,0.00019945591],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024497965,0.0015507148,0.001025427,0.0011267574,0.008040935,0.005664406,0.0019841387,0.001815452,0.00039039526],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0023734465,0.0015253805,0.09478446,0.00027647812,0.0020014825,0.009315341,0.019600587,0.00095264026,0.0022611676,0.80727714,0.039177753,0.020454092],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0038338315,0.0005382508,0.17908978,0.0013104936,0.00064442726,0.0007814705,0.011129658,0.0005366383,0.0005055322,0.0054501714,0.7941306,0.002049116],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019012399,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027620203,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.801827,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008715989,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009375527,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986942},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3002188859","doi":"10.51343/rfdcp.v4i11.156","title":"EL PROCESO CONSTITUYENTE Y LA VIOLENCIA POLÍTICA: LOS DEBATES CONSTITUCIONALES DE 1979 Y 1993 FRENTE A LA SUBVERSIÓN","year":2019,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Revista de la Facultad de Derecho y Ciencias Políticas (Cusco)","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Universidad de Buenos Aires; De La Salle University; Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea; York University; Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos; Universidad de Alicante","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.014753440361892573,"score_gpt":0.3568075970065477,"score_spread":0.3420541566446551,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3002188859","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.68451625,0.013305099,0.0056382427,0.004798193,0.00046475852,0.0029136676,0.0011672389,0.00061648944,0.2865801],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98966706,0.0057331086,0.0018801582,0.0008450121,0.0004196897,0.00014577333,0.00004312026,0.00006798276,0.0011980713],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9898272,0.0029447628,0.0012316357,0.0016624195,0.0018591849,0.0024748056],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9905555,0.005853619,0.0007221044,0.00073229853,0.0010429973,0.0010934728],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0045163175,0.0011830252,0.0015103684,0.000549231,0.0016676263,0.0016311551,0.0018635748,0.0009257665,0.0006008663],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006384446,0.0011582854,0.00073742593,0.0019701412,0.008492595,0.00095227634,0.00066199823,0.0016094053,0.0014052903],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016999128,0.0005872499,0.1956895,0.00047715846,0.0004999858,0.0004592746,0.0045694066,0.0001393796,0.0037425281,0.7856151,0.006196743,0.0018537006],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0037926377,0.00031601192,0.10764964,0.005704618,0.0013772437,0.0013101064,0.012697538,0.0016729588,0.002054207,0.012806348,0.84755874,0.0030599434],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012707113,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00032197338,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.841362,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020225325,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008168767,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99963206},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3006335579","doi":"10.35707/dostresmil/1907","title":"El régimen jurídico de los actos administrativos del Banco de la República, ¿derecho administrativo o derecho económico?","year":2017,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Dos mil tres mil","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Optech (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Derecho; Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04419801381961101,"score_gpt":0.4407117384034791,"score_spread":0.3965137245838681,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3006335579","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5701367,0.003599073,0.00033267366,0.006964373,0.0006308391,0.0010362535,0.00071410544,0.00022202544,0.41636392],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9870073,0.00426807,0.0014274516,0.0003724602,0.001076912,0.00029060623,0.000024071478,0.000059076236,0.0054740226],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9934933,0.0014687319,0.0009819708,0.0013396008,0.0011045026,0.0016118503],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99409467,0.0021525219,0.0010351731,0.0014634064,0.00043744617,0.000816781],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018921549,0.000919128,0.001085602,0.0002244305,0.0049253935,0.00183513,0.0024212177,0.00071578845,0.0010184716],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0032177838,0.00093803817,0.0005451641,0.0003385855,0.006306514,0.0010337484,0.000549668,0.0010628664,0.00039633337],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011803018,0.002929749,0.6020956,0.00046318534,0.0019393552,0.0010357087,0.022118175,0.000032068838,0.008509448,0.23913632,0.0781036,0.042456485],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0035390335,0.000737709,0.4047208,0.0012514427,0.00057209586,0.00015921319,0.009804442,0.0003289154,0.012152349,0.016316172,0.54812545,0.00229238],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002407501,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0075325295,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47002184,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008799329,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005451646,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99989474},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3020970558","doi":"","title":"El nuevo mecanismo de nombramiento de los Magistrados de la Corte Suprema Canadiense: ¿Un ejemplo que España debería seguir?","year":2020,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Revista General de Derecho Constitucional - ISSN 1886-6212","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.024278642201475374,"score_gpt":0.3467100251255775,"score_spread":0.3224313829241022,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3020970558","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8770477,0.01563421,0.02475076,0.025072178,0.0010057208,0.0021772357,0.0023034653,0.00049788965,0.05151084],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98008543,0.0033422878,0.00779722,0.005287097,0.002050851,0.00015670733,0.00010464087,0.000087091816,0.0010886753],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99087906,0.0025394196,0.0011838415,0.0015684696,0.0014063419,0.002422897],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9943742,0.0014641165,0.00059177075,0.00061403256,0.00074429106,0.0022115477],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022431973,0.001111667,0.0013593072,0.00025898535,0.002080308,0.0010797087,0.0015905667,0.0006781713,0.0010247222],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026767526,0.0012515393,0.0006894175,0.0012257416,0.0042130067,0.0005263242,0.00048420712,0.0013677435,0.00030858436],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022648141,0.00030072904,0.088818066,0.00038684887,0.0006589722,0.0011874533,0.004871365,0.0010465328,0.0065842494,0.872173,0.021251293,0.0024949866],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0024384137,0.00028511116,0.09142939,0.0013499334,0.0009991744,0.0009863882,0.002227017,0.0053884974,0.0022591278,0.010673327,0.8792151,0.0027484845],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012184435,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0072484575,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86149967,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036256437,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016016735,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99995726},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3033975833","doi":"10.18601/01236458.n51.05","title":"Fundamentos para una estrategia metodológica de aplicación de la jurisprudencia constitucional en el sistema judicial del Ecuador","year":2020,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Con-texto","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Performance Plants (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.07671775752121204,"score_gpt":0.42544106835450857,"score_spread":0.34872331083329655,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3033975833","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8616285,0.0042373273,0.003987708,0.019452063,0.00060292607,0.0014576715,0.00036126672,0.0003424449,0.107930094],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99322444,0.0011378716,0.0009793028,0.002112262,0.0020339768,0.00016873206,0.000019725281,0.00003808196,0.00028562552],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.993501,0.0018788673,0.0009196701,0.0011312456,0.0012995509,0.0012696503],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9948336,0.0028914788,0.00045977958,0.0003626403,0.00046337867,0.00098916],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017864829,0.0007150051,0.001052938,0.00015387483,0.001637992,0.00056813506,0.001201228,0.00052241597,0.001045253],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019933733,0.00075319153,0.00048639099,0.0009752976,0.0049108933,0.00047583174,0.00050170114,0.0008899313,0.001147666],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005928485,0.0006369816,0.06382513,0.00033399506,0.00096209126,0.00070334534,0.020173088,0.0003494461,0.011298058,0.87497306,0.022910625,0.0032413574],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005636031,0.001135276,0.30467412,0.0019454411,0.0016550035,0.00018154483,0.027755054,0.0024601577,0.005298643,0.034658678,0.6104728,0.004127262],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00075865845,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00031717177,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8403143,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008553745,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0054974947,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998679},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3041108799","doi":"10.25267/rejucrim.2020.i1.6","title":"Neoconstitucionalismo ambiental y derechos de la Naturaleza en el marco del nuevo constitucionalismo latinoamericano: El caso de Colombia","year":2020,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Revista de Estudios Jurídicos y Criminológicos","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Optech (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Geography; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0322238755475989,"score_gpt":0.36302036121594433,"score_spread":0.3307964856683454,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3041108799","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9476166,0.013547258,0.0027758528,0.013598709,0.00063252234,0.0025602246,0.000809768,0.0005074931,0.017951591],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98356956,0.005643299,0.0027294408,0.0056649405,0.0016700785,0.00040840232,0.00008042126,0.00009339214,0.00014049168],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9891123,0.0036491356,0.0014217296,0.0017438617,0.0018860368,0.0021868928],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9919157,0.0043205977,0.0008799805,0.00063369225,0.0007612453,0.0014887556],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.002223219,0.0012824148,0.0018155,0.0003039352,0.0024253186,0.000906309,0.0018023063,0.00074939657,0.00044857405],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005231734,0.0013982691,0.0008450583,0.0014971803,0.007177765,0.00069256604,0.0010225908,0.0020402933,0.00039231245],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00041820863,0.0009056526,0.1975343,0.00058335764,0.0010039709,0.0012461658,0.02650645,0.00021236225,0.0025963166,0.73871744,0.02381499,0.006460794],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0046495823,0.00070279156,0.27484316,0.0021381075,0.002353955,0.0010618054,0.022221766,0.0016984027,0.000833277,0.003036714,0.6829625,0.0034979407],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016016524,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00012226032,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7356807,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002834097,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0067979046,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999928},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3048440481","doi":"","title":"As restrições existentes na celebração de tratados internacionais no Direito Tributário (Limitations on the Power to Make Tax Treaties: A Perspective from Brazilian Federalism)","year":2003,"lang":"pt","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Government (linguistics); Power (physics); Perspective (graphical); Political science; Portuguese; Welfare economics; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.0434603590547473,"score_gpt":0.33702558323720144,"score_spread":0.2935652241824541,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3048440481","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.766218,0.014080058,0.0036908798,0.07876098,0.0020398158,0.0018022661,0.00043700813,0.00010801724,0.13286297],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.970313,0.0043473346,0.000056684425,0.001111392,0.00046641962,0.00009578187,0.0000071037957,0.000033275526,0.023568973],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99289256,0.0016870404,0.00065184274,0.0007116245,0.001178829,0.002878091],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9957803,0.0020176822,0.00041706837,0.00035846457,0.0010511049,0.00037537178],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020937703,0.00056898216,0.00056502386,0.00024729292,0.0038266084,0.00067216,0.000957321,0.00017375886,0.00065090886],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0057136677,0.00044378676,0.00051651156,0.0008200736,0.00080179225,0.00038059326,0.00009151537,0.002506022,0.000868505],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00037306704,0.00032813812,0.0014695745,0.000001854499,0.0009982792,0.000024183431,0.06458277,0.00003819513,0.00015995784,0.9256185,0.005702134,0.0007033329],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001198449,0.0020627724,0.0029919033,0.00033311886,0.00023297062,0.00009983772,0.6665984,0.000020646208,0.000375353,0.26042897,0.06487785,0.0007797674],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0054239263,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08528388,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.66518956,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006856144,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009683506,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99990946},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3083988542","doi":"10.5377/cuadernojurypol.v5i14.11160","title":"El derecho político frente al «nuevo constitucionalismo latinoamericano». Análisis comparativo con el modelo de democracia constitucional","year":2019,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Cuaderno Jurídico y Político","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Optech (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02649206044515294,"score_gpt":0.36755097593231845,"score_spread":0.3410589154871655,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3083988542","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6691225,0.0071392157,0.008835844,0.035546888,0.0042792824,0.0029485885,0.0016458661,0.00060702366,0.26987478],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9889687,0.0016176149,0.0012460783,0.004729461,0.0010885228,0.00015766603,0.00014762215,0.000095910655,0.0019484392],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9893271,0.0013496645,0.0018045824,0.0021012395,0.0028444747,0.0025729567],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9930683,0.0022002782,0.0011861494,0.0010988765,0.0012289736,0.0012174406],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013284328,0.0015086825,0.0022015464,0.00066422083,0.0024381508,0.00071612233,0.0017862268,0.00067940424,0.003689778],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008899669,0.0016126386,0.00083706004,0.0015839747,0.007927083,0.0012902593,0.0007992234,0.0016261115,0.0050460002],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00032398483,0.00088496646,0.21037899,0.00013594092,0.00095307594,0.00008426778,0.006163261,0.0015146177,0.0023810333,0.74374086,0.032186024,0.0012529962],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.012440478,0.0011099991,0.1987193,0.0036066868,0.0021193873,0.00047329708,0.030948777,0.045182317,0.0023880596,0.060314957,0.6344302,0.008266503],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002528749,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005628689,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6834259,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016155165,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005333297,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99976623},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3090070772","doi":"10.47712/rd.2019.v4i2.45","title":"EJERCICIO DEL DERECHO DEL CIUDADANO A LA REVOCATORIA DEL PARLAMENTARIO","year":2019,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"REVISTA DE DERECHO","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Optech (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Derecho; Philosophy","score_opus":0.025606592339305907,"score_gpt":0.3450405335345095,"score_spread":0.3194339411952036,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3090070772","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8293257,0.0247179,0.0027332522,0.0035501132,0.0017002468,0.0023818805,0.00013990748,0.00031988326,0.13513115],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98447716,0.008272345,0.0018010183,0.0009388685,0.0007194142,0.00012114676,0.000021361291,0.000058656355,0.0035900485],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9939377,0.0013981651,0.0009668919,0.0011636319,0.0012691976,0.0012644527],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99590915,0.0016352611,0.0005387789,0.0008500118,0.0005909914,0.00047581823],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020288841,0.00072458957,0.0011255126,0.00024105073,0.0010525362,0.0009738528,0.0011790398,0.00047771703,0.0008967092],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010229708,0.00074570545,0.00049001665,0.0011347735,0.0011348183,0.0006369078,0.00048018017,0.0009366638,0.0029324926],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001734528,0.0003674386,0.39883488,0.0004380037,0.00062850997,0.00008019729,0.007466759,0.00009827745,0.0008750468,0.546974,0.032722566,0.01134088],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012389049,0.00014118101,0.047364913,0.0017661402,0.00043333165,0.00003933701,0.0077094105,0.00037489927,0.00026210168,0.0044513275,0.93487716,0.0013412813],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004523102,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001173893,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9021546,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024215542,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003262394,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994994},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3108959183","doi":"10.32457/riem.vi3.434","title":"Consideraciones sobre el Régimen Municipal Argentino","year":2011,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Revista iberoamericana de estudios municipales","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Optech (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.07759291257997766,"score_gpt":0.3563236753302094,"score_spread":0.2787307627502318,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3108959183","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8498128,0.024594437,0.00013004773,0.0016914736,0.0006268022,0.0012418041,0.000117199,0.00028620905,0.121499225],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9574355,0.038934197,0.0015594702,0.0004621766,0.0005384088,0.00018574056,0.000014636961,0.00006220098,0.0008076827],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99319994,0.0017614904,0.0011763248,0.0010902986,0.0010924623,0.0016794864],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9957576,0.00097178353,0.000934973,0.0011385999,0.0005916145,0.00060542725],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015469976,0.0008725531,0.0015315245,0.00033473092,0.0021905934,0.00029877466,0.0014407731,0.0002048708,0.00070102524],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001036778,0.00089571363,0.0005745691,0.0014773158,0.0062922896,0.0005263029,0.0008497583,0.0007142028,0.0007107563],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016680834,0.00089753926,0.16545165,0.0002171169,0.0014951384,0.00027884386,0.07789655,0.000031598523,0.00012301542,0.7408707,0.0033677765,0.00920324],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018017344,0.00094727724,0.21234357,0.0020565693,0.0021926467,0.000118216165,0.13678485,0.00050099875,0.00023429457,0.004449882,0.635113,0.003456924],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009525704,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003062017,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.73642087,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005963762,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011932645,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99934936},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3111272487","doi":"10.28939/iam.debats.134-2.11","title":"NOGUERA FERNÁNDEZ, Albert La ideología de la soberanía. Hacia una reconstrucción emancipadora del constitucionalismo","year":2020,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Debats Revista de cultura poder i societat","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Okanagan College","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.029591007120229957,"score_gpt":0.35700537850975034,"score_spread":0.3274143713895204,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3111272487","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.62443006,0.040416047,0.0074056047,0.107528366,0.0010600586,0.0027042166,0.0007991037,0.00090809696,0.21474847],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.978452,0.007753659,0.0035858266,0.007461234,0.000975846,0.00011469152,0.00007604412,0.000054788663,0.0015258901],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.992852,0.0023533385,0.0010431167,0.0012736933,0.0011314045,0.0013464822],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99499184,0.002353653,0.00057064864,0.0003949581,0.0008084717,0.00088045717],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017029331,0.00091012346,0.0013084265,0.000073785726,0.00220281,0.00150579,0.0011362827,0.0007342902,0.0006541357],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025018393,0.0008479078,0.0008943139,0.0010619853,0.0072781644,0.0007538937,0.00045972216,0.0013151808,0.0004906264],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014796905,0.00026440955,0.0578314,0.0005407943,0.0011756384,0.00030294538,0.064601205,0.00019911067,0.0015742466,0.73351824,0.13629712,0.0035469008],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016262832,0.00009338602,0.016740337,0.0010867413,0.00060641376,0.00021272775,0.016699715,0.00053990935,0.00024222469,0.0039101397,0.95666933,0.0015728035],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005780098,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00013128582,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8203722,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008358105,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025401427,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99953073},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3118614791","doi":"","title":"El reenvío en el Derecho Internacional Privado contemporáneo","year":2020,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Derecho; Humanities; Geography; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.06599963428179362,"score_gpt":0.4028983771535709,"score_spread":0.3368987428717773,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3118614791","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14359137,0.0027336855,0.0070250235,0.19015783,0.0014970531,0.0008982491,0.00010267084,0.00033873058,0.6536554],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99184996,0.0011029876,0.00045248555,0.0027519553,0.001506941,0.00002524073,0.0000064548167,0.00001270159,0.002291302],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969848,0.00042722272,0.0005129798,0.0006393926,0.0009653075,0.00047029415],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981942,0.0007350136,0.00019885125,0.00017909586,0.00033474746,0.0003580966],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00049339805,0.00032841615,0.00048353407,0.00006609611,0.00063530216,0.00019882595,0.00083832076,0.00015232687,0.001447176],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011874096,0.00029890475,0.00023410903,0.0004765523,0.0014173216,0.00045127183,0.0005637409,0.00041151026,0.0017168275],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012117679,0.0001135046,0.07012852,0.000040830528,0.00025470142,0.000034046738,0.017774163,0.000008734175,0.00041728065,0.8799416,0.028468061,0.0026973914],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00095312804,0.00027997728,0.04536558,0.00025729268,0.000081093705,0.000004418849,0.018780068,0.00040136062,0.0005874153,0.0065766606,0.92596936,0.00074363354],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001006497,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006295679,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8975013,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020705565,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000655254,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999463},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122691247","doi":"","title":"ESPECIALISTAS ANALIZAN IMPACTOS DE LA REGULACIÓN DE LA CANNABIS. SEMINARIO INTERNACIONAL EN JURÍDICAS","year":2019,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Gaceta UNAM (2010-2019)","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.010933712318928852,"score_gpt":0.34816616555671587,"score_spread":0.337232453237787,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122691247","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.78777343,0.004459329,0.0006039872,0.012479944,0.0030834125,0.0010336129,0.00044922886,0.00022078112,0.18989629],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93815637,0.002237104,0.00032224454,0.0003994081,0.0013765432,0.000044569828,0.000042523232,0.000050712206,0.057370503],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99299514,0.0026598028,0.00069641543,0.0009518227,0.0013371398,0.0013596824],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962517,0.0015737503,0.00047625313,0.000712566,0.00038308642,0.0006026246],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036733085,0.00068205356,0.0009146245,0.00035781058,0.0008538939,0.0007959856,0.0013528462,0.00066370756,0.0027939733],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012925497,0.0006759197,0.00047821554,0.00075170567,0.003952972,0.0006123114,0.0006355066,0.0010632792,0.0013529006],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00029010634,0.00044774843,0.23465255,0.00009518308,0.000573149,0.00015261504,0.025322301,0.00015746632,0.0022697311,0.30931184,0.4246893,0.0020380141],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008748323,0.00014128938,0.30084258,0.00036832233,0.00017104289,0.0000916986,0.0027862315,0.00012475572,0.00027924284,0.0037804244,0.68982923,0.0007103193],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009558096,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024161479,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3055314,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018154621,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036813694,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995692},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125089694","doi":"10.30827/acfs.v55i0.15579","title":"Pluralismo liberal, razón pública y libertades básicas","year":2021,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Anales de la Cátedra Francisco Suárez","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.017239529139084844,"score_gpt":0.3591622275219714,"score_spread":0.3419226983828866,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125089694","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5510249,0.0521898,0.0009825177,0.07267851,0.0016579945,0.00062566466,0.00023333827,0.00041762122,0.32018963],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97383094,0.01203835,0.00089932035,0.0026735857,0.001282285,0.00006170296,0.00004396926,0.000046160098,0.009123705],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9942956,0.0016524212,0.000729486,0.0010015765,0.0011489379,0.0011720083],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9952501,0.0025059718,0.00029849657,0.0006878543,0.0007929475,0.0004645945],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009086814,0.0006093492,0.0009155519,0.0002198725,0.001630946,0.0010603116,0.0008641801,0.00046982284,0.0018433989],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001562464,0.0006275329,0.0004928671,0.0020084025,0.003753002,0.00081730523,0.00045764956,0.0008564658,0.00077555975],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012065576,0.00084486965,0.07348998,0.00019903661,0.001001809,0.0015241113,0.025351139,0.00019337151,0.0024987226,0.73375106,0.1524842,0.008541027],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00075629214,0.0000779166,0.053320713,0.00042481328,0.00024627036,0.00007187525,0.003722313,0.00018191611,0.0013533154,0.010244686,0.92874867,0.0008512133],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011375467,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021469183,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7762645,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003433957,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018255265,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999767},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3143043853","doi":"","title":"«Lo que nos depara el futuro» - Preguntas filosóficas acerca del futuro del derecho público","year":2015,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Revista europea de historia de las ideas políticas y de las instituciones públicas/Revista europea de historia de las ideas políticas y de las instituciones públicas","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.040744329659772704,"score_gpt":0.3416598115803419,"score_spread":0.3009154819205692,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3143043853","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.29692852,0.17957345,0.042905018,0.0444197,0.038259886,0.018026378,0.0058187875,0.010605852,0.36346242],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91707766,0.0139745725,0.0175241,0.008071653,0.028483812,0.0013895045,0.00054981984,0.0017420036,0.011186882],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.95376897,0.014779471,0.0078117903,0.0072013843,0.0058396305,0.0105987275],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96707034,0.0044824057,0.0049247937,0.0072388886,0.005744415,0.01053914],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.014252046,0.006426571,0.0069338097,0.0040354803,0.0076801176,0.005962043,0.010093908,0.0036889093,0.00092578464],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03302261,0.007201183,0.0035004255,0.008797069,0.008189029,0.004055915,0.0039552487,0.008249884,0.0055836802],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0027722837,0.002618723,0.008237888,0.0016018953,0.0017062401,0.0070972797,0.011335317,0.0012709168,0.0018532955,0.7096742,0.25066888,0.001163104],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007344117,0.0012823177,0.004014776,0.0028678267,0.004590239,0.005343337,0.0016777498,0.0016184076,0.0002342625,0.0073181046,0.9566447,0.0070641697],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006773121,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0036699213,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7059758,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.042146415,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02799208,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999875},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3155677309","doi":"","title":"Régimen jurídico de las regiones y los departamentos: análisis crítico de la descentralización territorial en Colombia","year":2021,"lang":"es","type":"dissertation","venue":"TDX (Tesis Doctorals en Xarxa)","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Geography; Cartography; Philosophy","score_opus":0.018744466093575125,"score_gpt":0.3921418352272874,"score_spread":0.3733973691337123,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3155677309","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96833706,0.0059485035,0.00014359431,0.002323831,0.005302666,0.0013864074,0.00031807998,0.00031765125,0.01592222],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98177433,0.0072284336,0.0010496071,0.00020848184,0.0046936492,0.0004320896,0.0003897161,0.00009219818,0.004131484],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9888453,0.004749677,0.0011750057,0.0013713919,0.0022268305,0.001631784],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9927221,0.004176531,0.0008122773,0.0006143979,0.0010474001,0.0006272827],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027059712,0.0010613475,0.0015798293,0.00037632082,0.0017433662,0.001204787,0.0012899975,0.0012771494,0.0011852235],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004202721,0.0011735327,0.0007274151,0.0011544892,0.0014954035,0.0006852543,0.0002742596,0.0009293972,0.0001729516],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013848116,0.0027600604,0.5543795,0.0011616426,0.0037336282,0.0008006044,0.12806599,0.00024695048,0.018335586,0.1370169,0.14805536,0.0040589217],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0030500386,0.00050602155,0.32765207,0.0038135126,0.0029224067,0.00005107947,0.048082944,0.00015499294,0.017590657,0.0062494753,0.58632964,0.0035971792],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009122102,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00996488,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43827426,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029349965,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0041821776,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99983203},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3160863273","doi":"","title":"Jen Moore c. el Ministerio del Interior del Peru et al (informe de amicus curiae) (Jen Moore v. Minister of the Interior of Peru et al (Amicus Curiae Brief))","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Thompson Rivers University","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Derecho; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0203055209684275,"score_gpt":0.35066740528230145,"score_spread":0.3303618843138739,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3160863273","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9596049,0.0017492281,0.0019573604,0.026784727,0.0008603577,0.00046902584,0.00007165967,0.000033916287,0.008468805],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9914157,0.0019172913,0.000259107,0.0046481076,0.0002966304,0.000021342501,0.0000046329865,0.000028821361,0.0014083802],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9951315,0.0005830606,0.0009884156,0.00040996622,0.0009496279,0.0019374461],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99759537,0.00021893495,0.000823342,0.000369643,0.0008226061,0.00017010742],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003083358,0.00039721862,0.0006284072,0.00018175249,0.0008607706,0.00014938995,0.001343172,0.00013428915,0.00019180535],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005506963,0.0003026405,0.00047277624,0.00038445875,0.0029247925,0.00062825705,0.0004984796,0.0014283463,0.000028231289],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0030777378,0.0007336579,0.108782575,0.000105576924,0.0026845697,0.000039148446,0.19720888,0.00003367916,0.052819796,0.5607875,0.053213403,0.020513503],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006051331,0.0042020134,0.06625855,0.0018648569,0.00056076207,0.0017241731,0.13258481,0.00067766255,0.0050213747,0.048726693,0.7301801,0.0021476706],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013355897,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.034063343,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6769667,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014027783,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008486192,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99994254},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3164812074","doi":"","title":"A quienes sancionar? Maximos responsables y participacion determinante en la Jurisdiccion Especial para la Paz","year":2020,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Open Access at Essex (University of Essex)","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Environment and Climate Change Canada","keywords":"Physics","score_opus":0.12280311285272978,"score_gpt":0.427438487425281,"score_spread":0.30463537457255124,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3164812074","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91011226,0.00048573682,0.000997843,0.028252074,0.00035546423,0.0011040667,0.00019516666,0.000080944286,0.05841645],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99356514,0.0032247272,0.0003390586,0.00015079434,0.0002630653,0.000008016799,0.000018261528,0.000022334929,0.0024086211],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9949997,0.0020123029,0.0004336437,0.0009668739,0.00096397457,0.0006234756],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963344,0.0017403922,0.00066053495,0.00038973277,0.0004716712,0.00040330927],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013167047,0.0004466761,0.0009702753,0.00018996876,0.002169921,0.0008672207,0.0038491278,0.00032199852,0.0016572378],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00055894995,0.00051723846,0.00026050847,0.0012824733,0.0027951836,0.0036290104,0.00571311,0.00033689543,0.00024467555],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.017073128,0.0023071454,0.24627686,0.0014006114,0.0015126764,0.0027470812,0.22624154,0.00063643634,0.012483236,0.39732203,0.065698475,0.026300786],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002318473,0.00031644624,0.14221154,0.0007802589,0.0004286478,0.000009840189,0.02640118,0.0004977401,0.0013832807,0.0012921147,0.8233162,0.0010442716],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016005182,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0037183494,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7576177,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030056632,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010289571,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99991864},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3173603788","doi":"10.7202/1079424ar","title":"Strategies for Compliance with Non-Binding International Decisions: The Spanish Case","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue québécoise de droit international","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Compliance (psychology); Jurisdiction; Human rights; Treaty; Constitution; Covenant; Political science; Law; State (computer science); International law; International human rights law; State responsibility; Subject (documents); Law and economics; Sociology; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.07169632879697992,"score_gpt":0.37075330807347084,"score_spread":0.29905697927649094,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3173603788","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.30411646,0.00043523355,0.16106433,0.02958731,0.0035710111,0.0009629419,0.0004526853,0.00013480768,0.4996752],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99063677,0.00019427168,0.004637815,0.00043304067,0.0008757434,0.00017422596,0.00004234231,0.000011222299,0.0029945464],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99863243,0.00006232644,0.00025464376,0.00032512,0.00045563094,0.00026983532],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99741405,0.0010892539,0.00014570785,0.00017217471,0.0010991374,0.000079680896],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00044052314,0.00013156838,0.00016109651,0.00007439606,0.00086317165,0.00040430413,0.0005633105,0.000049412683,0.00024298398],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00081380963,0.000118242104,0.000116091476,0.0002215448,0.00045419726,0.00043166635,0.00008554086,0.00016337464,0.000038975082],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000064189546,0.00007744682,0.0024302474,0.0000074374166,0.00020361248,0.0006984687,0.0052083614,0.00060271355,0.00015141764,0.9854933,0.0025506935,0.002512085],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012637682,0.00006695759,0.00495352,0.0007981634,0.00009907089,0.0030722755,0.08117149,0.00620556,0.0002185145,0.083706796,0.8178413,0.00060259196],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012222166,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04515289,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9017865,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00055435725,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014152502,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9722706},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3179400873","doi":"","title":"Los métodos de la reforma informal (The Methods of Informal Amendment)","year":2019,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Sociology; Art","score_opus":0.012897209102573077,"score_gpt":0.38898907605203054,"score_spread":0.37609186694945745,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3179400873","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8260018,0.0048202304,0.007059244,0.0015711543,0.00066639704,0.00052601745,0.000010467542,0.000027465154,0.15931723],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9818856,0.01443475,0.00048617832,0.00015116185,0.00037245042,0.000010015949,0.0000012770726,0.000010786096,0.0026477429],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9945122,0.0010823146,0.00074607634,0.00016627376,0.00087960303,0.002613546],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977871,0.0007958213,0.00072752754,0.00023181565,0.00033182456,0.00012590618],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012347821,0.00027478972,0.00044257124,0.0001798827,0.00096207537,0.00019323714,0.0009518542,0.00016360363,0.00018658958],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003716067,0.0001939898,0.00032409665,0.0005710565,0.0015475778,0.0010854338,0.00026154492,0.0027062616,0.00012518624],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017112393,0.00007497046,0.019550765,0.000029509458,0.0005344906,0.0000015548302,0.008833571,0.00021788437,0.000408373,0.934919,0.0001236511,0.035135124],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0041989544,0.0023820298,0.070573494,0.0005575918,0.0005580206,0.0010942055,0.16065745,0.00078719517,0.001793924,0.14383964,0.6122857,0.0012718127],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00032510946,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004918253,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.79107934,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001351584,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011245859,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995945},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3189081890","doi":"10.15517/id.2020.45931","title":"DERECHO, SISTEMA Y LEGITIMACIÓN. LA PROPUESTA HABERMASIANA: LA SUPERACIÓN INDIVIDUALISTA DEL \"SUJETO\" POR LA CATEGORÍA DE LA \"INTERSUBJETIVIDAD\"","year":2021,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Revista Jurídica IUS Doctrina","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"HIV Legal Network","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.02169864666525912,"score_gpt":0.36917995542870014,"score_spread":0.347481308763441,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3189081890","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18185656,0.038400896,0.001090176,0.011934558,0.0006494046,0.001951086,0.0007359188,0.00053790474,0.7628435],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9807191,0.009882183,0.0010134738,0.00031254016,0.0005142535,0.00025902854,0.000081793405,0.00008205711,0.00713556],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9850342,0.008639299,0.0013395429,0.001634763,0.0018222751,0.001529879],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9909295,0.005844929,0.00061156304,0.0010048074,0.0008773016,0.00073191663],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.004861576,0.0010528,0.001588934,0.0003711917,0.0015672898,0.0034577288,0.0014635334,0.00074957206,0.00046971254],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0039861416,0.0010779381,0.00078849785,0.0019702017,0.0062138992,0.00086011534,0.00099913,0.0016555057,0.00032877733],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014271603,0.0011110135,0.04405995,0.0010673944,0.00071755995,0.0038967847,0.010436108,0.0000092429045,0.0005131703,0.9081573,0.015797958,0.01409082],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012731384,0.00012627462,0.034871366,0.0017811671,0.0005987325,0.0007837728,0.0046760202,0.00002786782,0.0003709861,0.0015118045,0.95277464,0.0012042159],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00082720094,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00037758335,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9369767,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010766069,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006005919,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99973255},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3207643404","doi":"","title":"Globalización, ética de mercado y derechos humanos","year":2020,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Aequitas Revue de développement humain handicap et changement social","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.11613296338579915,"score_gpt":0.42813717478069296,"score_spread":0.3120042113948938,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3207643404","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11468814,0.005038206,0.013646068,0.7442794,0.0018790679,0.004775878,0.000808942,0.0007028986,0.1141814],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97722876,0.005546096,0.0011567421,0.010838734,0.004168255,0.0004802785,0.00013126816,0.00006624506,0.000383595],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9927521,0.0013965917,0.0010267379,0.0011729986,0.0016250525,0.0020265428],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976303,0.00033649537,0.0006605715,0.00028861425,0.0003719974,0.0007120284],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025817363,0.0007756274,0.0010077389,0.00020766864,0.0033638363,0.0006596885,0.0012689672,0.00039987668,0.0034044844],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008216567,0.0009207625,0.0004934651,0.0011252159,0.0015951131,0.0003977723,0.0011112053,0.0006882196,0.0007425425],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021802768,0.00059999945,0.016333744,0.0005521841,0.0011730136,0.00014851955,0.1563074,0.000019072293,0.000986889,0.611332,0.2078762,0.004452958],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0034881623,0.0009077972,0.030816978,0.00077248627,0.0010609163,0.000006188439,0.03602698,0.00018236147,0.00051927275,0.011903234,0.91230756,0.002008053],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002782125,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006273605,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86254066,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002714272,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011635696,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993243},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3209843414","doi":"","title":"Alcances y límites de los derechos humanos desde una racionalidad analógica","year":2020,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Aequitas Revue de développement humain handicap et changement social","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.11246295510379468,"score_gpt":0.44241414055728545,"score_spread":0.3299511854534908,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3209843414","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.30178007,0.008193349,0.011222659,0.575523,0.0015767481,0.0058319527,0.0014699361,0.0007531418,0.09364913],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97360337,0.010870295,0.0011749765,0.008406263,0.0045732027,0.00068818626,0.00020115828,0.000066414636,0.00041613047],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9925117,0.0014543348,0.0010939159,0.0012536342,0.0017667026,0.0019197221],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971533,0.00062776817,0.0008682909,0.00027232672,0.00042232743,0.0006559928],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025719865,0.0008294211,0.0010611376,0.00030106722,0.0037495606,0.0007330217,0.0012893458,0.00036682977,0.0026801482],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00077067857,0.00094428845,0.0005367739,0.0012384314,0.0017821505,0.00050230685,0.0009230092,0.0007300917,0.0003959827],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00041146032,0.0008988825,0.028103312,0.0010710943,0.0019251626,0.00020278325,0.16611317,0.00006480095,0.0027132237,0.64122164,0.14967789,0.007596585],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0046038423,0.0012541359,0.04507559,0.0020431636,0.0012306884,0.000008020423,0.045808095,0.0002436401,0.0019308461,0.023167662,0.87177354,0.0028607484],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00021652962,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010713072,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.72209567,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022392867,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012897917,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993008},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3211148681","doi":"10.26514/inter.v12i35.5813","title":"Estudo Comparado Internacional em Educação Especial: Documentos Normativos e Orientadores no Brasil e no Canadá - International Comparative Study in Special Education: Normative and Guideline Documents in Brazil and Canada","year":2021,"lang":"pt","type":"article","venue":"INTERFACES DA EDUCAÇÃO","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Normative; Humanities; Guideline; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.032292518092150065,"score_gpt":0.38617290652090047,"score_spread":0.3538803884287504,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3211148681","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94921947,0.0019794868,0.00001050271,0.0059435437,0.015780361,0.0015897781,0.00033701502,0.000019281351,0.02512059],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98895544,0.00041216303,0.00016080911,0.00087477,0.0023453827,0.00020895233,0.000110219014,0.000025663438,0.006906617],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9927505,0.0011721962,0.0020807832,0.0013615018,0.0017192394,0.00091575715],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9957576,0.00073824753,0.000719824,0.00038705312,0.0019098036,0.00048746588],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00082284934,0.0008890734,0.0013288031,0.0005702278,0.0006879353,0.0009731141,0.0010016289,0.00014812221,0.004247623],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006674379,0.00096173806,0.00009185703,0.0009561397,0.0010742836,0.0017608564,0.0012419398,0.0009752445,0.00019929948],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00051740365,0.0030535348,0.4498336,0.00007094387,0.00067382416,0.00015394104,0.2672549,0.000096337244,0.00003338089,0.002087294,0.2741811,0.0020437506],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0028585866,0.00030850654,0.18334818,0.001029216,0.000089913745,0.000053683023,0.67440385,0.00023880195,0.000118827156,0.0003001088,0.13609487,0.0011554448],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.60888726,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9928355,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.40714896,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034793576,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009915179,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992833},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3211815032","doi":"","title":"El rol de Canadá frente a la Comisión Interamericana de Derechos Humanos en el contexto de la OEA/ The role of Canada before the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights in the framework of the OAS","year":2012,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Cuestiones Jurídicas","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.021306835806628135,"score_gpt":0.4076690892223403,"score_spread":0.3863622534157122,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3211815032","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9646316,0.0008650801,0.0002526025,0.013589446,0.00024502454,0.0006976871,0.000067841494,0.000015649966,0.019635059],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988087,0.000050258466,0.000050595125,0.00058111834,0.0002974852,0.00010686841,0.000002279751,0.000012718814,0.00008998055],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9931163,0.004746195,0.0005157971,0.00024052955,0.00075924123,0.00062189694],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9937329,0.004793422,0.0005713069,0.00057419506,0.00016876173,0.00015939453],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023734418,0.00030660484,0.00044430184,0.00007651242,0.0019549476,0.000085201624,0.0016726207,0.00013726666,0.000037734368],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014395926,0.00015375527,0.00017760658,0.0006617488,0.0056368415,0.00009755732,0.0002690027,0.0011289471,0.000002059238],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005308846,0.00030385685,0.3899105,0.000017861006,0.00014581502,0.000004719934,0.0821475,0.0000595909,0.00016452334,0.5228212,0.0026499354,0.0017214161],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025118256,0.00013862732,0.80080885,0.0010458293,0.00014104022,0.000019503294,0.052611556,0.0001553603,0.0006220439,0.027167883,0.11682092,0.00021720008],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8485626,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8370696,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49565333,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010360021,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013909278,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99934435},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3214812954","doi":"10.4000/books.psorbonne.90192","title":"La désobéissance civile ou l’expression vertueuse d’un désaccord sur les valeurs fondamentales de la démocratie constitutionnelle","year":2020,"lang":"fr","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Éditions de la Sorbonne eBooks","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Political science; Humanities","score_opus":0.04022877128376393,"score_gpt":0.3057225903604062,"score_spread":0.26549381907664227,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3214812954","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017510887,0.0035210634,0.0061072167,0.0027106006,0.0007710675,0.0008931161,0.0010697233,0.0003849977,0.9670313],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98076296,0.0015153527,0.0034203161,0.0004063434,0.0008721117,0.00030064717,0.00011454023,0.00007540549,0.012532325],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99442595,0.0019325376,0.0008336322,0.0010418907,0.0009645778,0.0008014167],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9926502,0.005333341,0.00058076467,0.00051066093,0.0004068966,0.00051814056],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011521133,0.00089718105,0.00088922156,0.00024790785,0.005612498,0.00046136708,0.0008897882,0.0009942307,0.001603472],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010777686,0.0009982866,0.00057858136,0.00016416385,0.023277264,0.0004056603,0.00052865554,0.0017574748,0.00033500767],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000060874954,0.00020549697,0.0014854644,0.00011035565,0.00028964155,0.0004075099,0.003491088,0.00014736968,0.0013751346,0.9783503,0.0107456595,0.0033311106],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014902402,0.0001714332,0.0021604823,0.0027597195,0.0005933722,0.0002693207,0.0044854693,0.0002128075,0.0017712367,0.44870493,0.5356903,0.0016906667],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005887313,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020412891,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96325207,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011467395,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021229403,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993092},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3217670636","doi":"10.4067/s0718-80722021000300303","title":"EL DERECHO A LA ALIMENTACIÓN ADECUADA EN CHILE Y SU NECESARIA CONSAGRACIÓN COMO DERECHO FUNDAMENTAL EN LA NUEVA CONSTITUCIÓN CHILENA","year":2021,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Revista chilena de derecho privado","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Derecho; Philosophy; Humanities; Political science","score_opus":0.01581440022953749,"score_gpt":0.34891546645991184,"score_spread":0.33310106623037433,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3217670636","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6343178,0.05345278,0.0031588867,0.016300818,0.002720952,0.005061492,0.0035737809,0.0011242388,0.2802892],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96672475,0.026147002,0.0024947808,0.0013193848,0.0014499776,0.0002669164,0.00033609523,0.00014511366,0.0011159625],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9834781,0.007803002,0.0019403319,0.0024169325,0.002129878,0.0022317003],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98898345,0.0066587445,0.0010344915,0.0015067462,0.00071595755,0.0011006172],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036958572,0.0016756381,0.00228501,0.00045725695,0.0028097127,0.0031079955,0.0021435614,0.0011495238,0.0022812958],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0032904416,0.0018092908,0.0010891238,0.0019489602,0.004299539,0.0011410594,0.0017930439,0.0026133114,0.0010624037],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00033747416,0.0022240034,0.17113894,0.00104715,0.0031413771,0.0013735838,0.018361634,0.000046450226,0.0036181253,0.75454724,0.019563077,0.024600957],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0042247777,0.00023865952,0.056416996,0.004507688,0.0012641749,0.0011446732,0.011137229,0.00013069162,0.0033972461,0.005712218,0.9089732,0.0028524178],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010230769,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00047698815,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88941014,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021382535,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0054114987,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997154},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W32847991","doi":"10.1136/oemed-2020-106470","title":"El constitucionalismo latinoamericano y la codificación en el siglo XIX","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Anuario Iberoamericano de Justicia Constitucional","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Fonds de Recherche du Québec - Santé; Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Institut de Recherche Robert-Sauvé en Santé et en Sécurité du Travail; Cancer Research Society","keywords":"Humanities; Latin Americans; Political science; Art; Law","score_opus":0.03147410561429315,"score_gpt":0.3499861123954017,"score_spread":0.3185120067811086,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W32847991","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.077606454,0.0019179506,0.016622953,0.015738478,0.0017107051,0.0010483046,0.0003371101,0.0007083685,0.88430965],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9883059,0.0008411351,0.004465326,0.0024430119,0.0009786353,0.0001514241,0.00002877999,0.000030706815,0.0027550561],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99465394,0.0010340988,0.00074291986,0.00089384045,0.0014341972,0.0012409964],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99440837,0.0035739997,0.00038184892,0.0004203428,0.00059674826,0.00061868335],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010326767,0.0005586202,0.0007736826,0.0003306629,0.0018276114,0.00017847812,0.0008378372,0.00028011706,0.0028055091],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002452718,0.0006018826,0.00031114262,0.0011392052,0.0091169495,0.00048967067,0.00024847055,0.00076429243,0.0013399045],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000043532968,0.00036619484,0.020002352,0.000014974781,0.00022230153,0.00017530438,0.0080076745,0.00043479094,0.00034412136,0.93635887,0.02826508,0.0057648267],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001389203,0.00013298434,0.028463269,0.00017640056,0.00040822933,0.0002597447,0.0076790154,0.001126404,0.00008821966,0.009121472,0.9495709,0.0015841376],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023716993,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00088220194,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9272374,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007338975,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00227419,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99964327},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3601015","doi":"10.1227/00006123-198705000-00004","title":"¿Nuevos derechos a debate?: razones para no resistir","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Anuario de Filosofía del Derecho","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05989594409544469,"score_gpt":0.3570506483159381,"score_spread":0.2971547042204934,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3601015","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23902373,0.0036374948,0.0069070114,0.0053727557,0.0014487451,0.0013034159,0.000054200358,0.0006256124,0.74162704],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98260015,0.0006501836,0.007450181,0.0010819522,0.0003496876,0.00016707652,0.000008257785,0.00002407628,0.007668409],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967794,0.00069411116,0.00041169184,0.0005629369,0.00066501304,0.00088686484],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977394,0.000795072,0.00015641439,0.00037908685,0.0006149396,0.00031511564],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010603496,0.000321422,0.0003987205,0.00015969067,0.0016523772,0.000190757,0.00049857283,0.00023645317,0.0008252221],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0035399455,0.00032889473,0.00018574769,0.0006194536,0.00090630417,0.0004209971,0.0000804194,0.0004006962,0.0017409073],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014604202,0.00041398522,0.10742075,0.000047174173,0.00030946414,0.00019289022,0.009039614,0.00008111535,0.0009898631,0.7514071,0.12658125,0.003370752],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00067685195,0.000087605906,0.018944532,0.0000993256,0.000072925985,0.00002785426,0.0017384548,0.00006354929,0.0012317593,0.054185748,0.9220847,0.00078672136],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030033535,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0061596036,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.79550344,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00046708444,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001380254,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999163},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4200235447","doi":"10.18042/cepc/igdes.5.02","title":"La futura Constitución chilena será escrita con mujeres","year":2021,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"IgualdadES","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"WSP (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03411169070354164,"score_gpt":0.37035834183293537,"score_spread":0.3362466511293937,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4200235447","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.49346867,0.027468788,0.00009343768,0.014280827,0.002361901,0.00040187166,0.00025358057,0.00023363368,0.46143728],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9900895,0.005704886,0.00026199108,0.0004698698,0.0011505991,0.00002900472,0.00001996998,0.000018605784,0.0022555846],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99625725,0.00095113995,0.0004953252,0.00074775825,0.00088051165,0.00066802616],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971795,0.001296267,0.00019295981,0.00038753322,0.00070842216,0.0002352907],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00062569045,0.00041615992,0.0006187952,0.000120163124,0.001425528,0.00070944754,0.0004944864,0.0002639223,0.0012087649],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012692129,0.0004154837,0.00026262732,0.00082442124,0.004753448,0.0005350407,0.0003985157,0.0005160786,0.0007925544],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034283483,0.0002988798,0.02258935,0.00010679504,0.00033760953,0.00038820284,0.013693774,0.00001536614,0.0012756308,0.935931,0.015965946,0.009363138],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007757665,0.00006677548,0.053299885,0.00076480146,0.0001834494,0.00006907281,0.060277615,0.000013425002,0.003207238,0.005508753,0.87503093,0.0008023042],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006919179,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001826955,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93042225,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001872159,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017849407,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99998546},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4206365152","doi":"10.7202/1044712ar","title":"TABLE DE LA JURISPRUDENCE","year":2013,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue du notariat","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"China Scholarship Council; McMaster University; McGill University","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Table (database); Philosophy; Political science; Law; Computer science; Data mining","score_opus":0.018395635138367155,"score_gpt":0.308510109282512,"score_spread":0.2901144741441448,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4206365152","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4225542,0.04257078,0.0076253098,0.14704625,0.00751292,0.0012367726,0.00005846969,0.00022351707,0.37117177],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95031863,0.004322857,0.0026433219,0.00043965617,0.0022194523,0.0001149247,0.0000022866636,0.0000148880445,0.039923947],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975885,0.0006775361,0.00031411427,0.0003989706,0.0003360209,0.0006848144],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979534,0.0010828183,0.00014589749,0.00024568875,0.00033635087,0.00023585126],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008982468,0.0002392105,0.0003438922,0.000059612994,0.0008548012,0.00025664896,0.0004918278,0.00021803076,0.0031769704],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00095203257,0.00026457175,0.00013321958,0.0006668435,0.0020387645,0.0008083699,0.00020600097,0.0004090794,0.004948436],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005790136,0.0001767151,0.05845166,0.00006592878,0.00008017704,0.000039086215,0.010543014,0.0003769817,0.00028772905,0.83828026,0.086326376,0.00536627],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021075245,0.00003632375,0.058935136,0.0002911379,0.000069772104,0.00003590186,0.002254358,0.0010871337,0.0000641559,0.024620334,0.9120214,0.00037358684],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016838023,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013883216,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.82569504,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00046777993,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00080582156,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999806},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4206534886","doi":"10.7202/1044797ar","title":"TABLE DE LA JURISPRUDENCE","year":2010,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue du notariat","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"China Scholarship Council; Barrick Gold Corporation","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Table (database); Philosophy; Political science; Computer science; Law; Database","score_opus":0.015490844038590254,"score_gpt":0.3252700740360141,"score_spread":0.30977922999742386,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4206534886","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6179472,0.011175387,0.0037139573,0.07583162,0.01565871,0.0005228935,0.000083909894,0.00017254437,0.27489376],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9669024,0.002103264,0.003809072,0.0002734698,0.0038859844,0.00003728259,0.0000023943787,0.000014912238,0.022971226],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978732,0.00045096886,0.00028903675,0.00041323886,0.0003391573,0.00063442945],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99790883,0.0011591278,0.00014611564,0.00029183613,0.00025944723,0.00023464697],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015395518,0.00023340195,0.0003248546,0.00006146391,0.0009878203,0.0001798384,0.00055526017,0.0003006293,0.0014853224],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016391508,0.00026547804,0.0001378684,0.00064859225,0.0027571495,0.00048425916,0.00019958596,0.00089676306,0.001174637],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010631549,0.00015491752,0.056092776,0.000039832135,0.000048249414,0.00006624831,0.007606725,0.00011088697,0.0015506254,0.9138167,0.017416589,0.0030858312],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019473699,0.000024812574,0.030978575,0.00013339393,0.000071789196,0.00006259245,0.0008596602,0.00046085537,0.00017057789,0.0145518435,0.952174,0.00031714566],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0048216893,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008173166,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9347574,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020919423,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001157547,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99997973},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4229487000","doi":"10.21892/9789588557724.3","title":"Tendencias del programa de Derecho","year":2018,"lang":"es","type":"book-chapter","venue":"CORPORACIÓN UNIVERSITARIA DEL CARIBE CECAR eBooks","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Optech (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Doxa; Episteme; Humanities; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.04731101886598166,"score_gpt":0.3019943972225367,"score_spread":0.254683378356555,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4229487000","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016396116,0.0011444235,0.002181502,0.0005000565,0.0019144687,0.001916904,0.0004987103,0.00047404485,0.9749738],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8091851,0.000545461,0.0025737016,0.00031589612,0.0016985651,0.000034388213,0.00012454174,0.00013032286,0.18539204],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99391145,0.0004000123,0.00086151744,0.0016922664,0.0016575601,0.0014771906],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9936192,0.0005571929,0.00116593,0.0009855197,0.0028574807,0.000814679],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010811931,0.0013274184,0.0014142259,0.0006807744,0.0033556302,0.0005001719,0.0018701641,0.0013618271,0.0011271841],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002392348,0.0015098774,0.0009164812,0.00023757048,0.008433523,0.00042679202,0.0011631845,0.0013378948,0.0013010217],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002941536,0.0000841865,0.0038269588,0.00007768162,0.0011613739,0.00069367816,0.011246116,0.000015557964,0.00006963053,0.96750385,0.00635651,0.008670289],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014158206,0.00063076505,0.00199889,0.0010307286,0.002137733,0.00008741828,0.018594453,0.0001432228,0.00009432453,0.097969614,0.87318647,0.0027105648],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028594292,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002752384,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86953425,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025399157,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004541146,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999477},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4232467898","doi":"10.7202/1045720ar","title":"TABLE DE LA JURISPRUDENCE","year":2004,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue du notariat","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Royal Bank of Canada","keywords":"Table (database); Computer science; Database","score_opus":0.02125538920914743,"score_gpt":0.32542550754361244,"score_spread":0.304170118334465,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4232467898","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4196988,0.06519968,0.030800778,0.18603653,0.010021929,0.00091919204,0.00011966373,0.0002944012,0.286909],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9766701,0.005783378,0.004031868,0.0003889518,0.0023131396,0.00003660658,0.0000025018812,0.000014953218,0.010758501],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978444,0.00042133583,0.0003021857,0.00041519367,0.00036135357,0.00065552664],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99860734,0.0005960309,0.00013989773,0.00023245857,0.00021353966,0.00021070706],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010901417,0.00024021255,0.0003411922,0.0000627828,0.00096405076,0.00015054112,0.00046600495,0.0002202295,0.00042804005],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00090801984,0.00027829636,0.00014622451,0.00078968954,0.0021930432,0.0005134649,0.00017551071,0.00043075325,0.0012169342],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012942976,0.00020408927,0.01423013,0.00005036754,0.000061891595,0.00013035325,0.0129552735,0.004439054,0.00015143187,0.9620583,0.004380708,0.0013254413],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00053083885,0.000057311885,0.019263988,0.00056132587,0.00010481871,0.000081337435,0.0020632665,0.00011364747,0.00018321833,0.064982966,0.9116338,0.00042351036],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008703886,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033560365,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9072531,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009801243,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017323337,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999669},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4232575241","doi":"10.7202/1045564ar","title":"REVUE DE JURISPRUDENCE EN DROIT DES OBLIGATIONS","year":2008,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue du notariat","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Political science; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.04932970650362369,"score_gpt":0.30979059485408916,"score_spread":0.2604608883504655,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4232575241","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.84009016,0.020207915,0.01640237,0.06344104,0.004225317,0.0007010718,0.00010541934,0.00020251844,0.05462421],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94812983,0.013214625,0.006991118,0.00023809004,0.0038134195,0.00007471258,0.0000074927284,0.000020728596,0.027510004],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99727815,0.0005082443,0.00049829466,0.00054575544,0.00038839888,0.0007811523],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976573,0.0010146587,0.00021135152,0.00034230258,0.00047623378,0.00029815047],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00081953406,0.00030299043,0.00046467228,0.00012741653,0.0024693043,0.000073062445,0.000627312,0.00023632399,0.00055416307],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017803349,0.0003837253,0.0002575257,0.0011533947,0.0034066872,0.00078192033,0.00021645254,0.00047941617,0.0014259013],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015594906,0.00021631732,0.121444926,0.000112401955,0.000112456895,0.00023385367,0.06087337,0.0010094636,0.00016537916,0.8050753,0.008376965,0.0023639828],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00055553124,0.00014857827,0.34975463,0.0014733915,0.0002739274,0.0007300301,0.005671986,0.0015993117,0.00020066956,0.085338585,0.5531713,0.001082049],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038335857,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006099102,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7197367,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015196925,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011850251,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998615},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4235274469","doi":"10.2307/j.ctv103xc7v.13","title":"LOS INTENTOS POR LOGRAR LA INCORPORACIÓN DE QUEBEC EN EL CONSENSO CONSTITUCIONAL:","year":2020,"lang":"es","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Dykinson eBooks","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.03943652279073629,"score_gpt":0.34433756017618916,"score_spread":0.3049010373854529,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4235274469","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002861376,0.0007327915,0.0007807723,0.0058814907,0.0010752785,0.0013902229,0.00072837283,0.00037383198,0.98617584],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9181227,0.00061633094,0.00066526275,0.0018134578,0.001416477,0.000097838056,0.00006790065,0.000089132394,0.07711088],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9947417,0.0007079988,0.0010449886,0.0012723807,0.001416915,0.00081605575],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995922,0.0014223957,0.00089188217,0.00047689452,0.0006603374,0.0006264742],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00096827396,0.001050933,0.0013671694,0.0003902761,0.0011592252,0.0002955847,0.0010260269,0.00085428415,0.00042966375],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00082736195,0.0010927443,0.00068215997,0.00011679623,0.010105364,0.00018183912,0.0006781899,0.0014947709,0.0009767591],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018457712,0.0000652426,0.0013978876,0.000116023984,0.0005798535,0.0007574691,0.0063826353,0.00000608534,0.00026582542,0.9787784,0.0030630163,0.008402962],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006947716,0.00012666568,0.0018754449,0.0010995821,0.00035383544,0.00008064461,0.0030613525,0.00003065755,0.00011428863,0.05223001,0.93912935,0.0012034002],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00879322,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020427037,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9360663,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00083213084,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004036826,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998011},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4235934855","doi":"10.7202/1043608ar","title":"TABLE DE LA JURISPRUDENCE","year":2015,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue du notariat","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"China Scholarship Council","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Table (database); Political science; Law; Computer science; Data mining","score_opus":0.055535715237667836,"score_gpt":0.3544230507346927,"score_spread":0.2988873354970249,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4235934855","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21912132,0.08134083,0.013035054,0.11775567,0.013375047,0.0007620872,0.00010337118,0.00025658557,0.55425006],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.958066,0.0027137904,0.0029515151,0.00033867973,0.003132995,0.000036817448,0.000003045504,0.000015181374,0.032741982],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99741495,0.00084990636,0.0002929306,0.00038333607,0.00044809325,0.0006107626],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99806195,0.0007671628,0.00014411709,0.00023766092,0.00040848687,0.00038063008],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020540329,0.00022597166,0.00034969495,0.00005977785,0.0005542954,0.00015907387,0.00047911145,0.0002121357,0.00029589186],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020144938,0.0002567175,0.00011094132,0.0007492248,0.001970165,0.0005434876,0.00022309988,0.00038738424,0.0014436756],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024250583,0.00017226812,0.052612245,0.000038202674,0.00006467108,0.000115265815,0.021139095,0.0011208248,0.000038868475,0.8384383,0.084263675,0.0019723433],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033284316,0.00005190766,0.007107123,0.00022165825,0.000079214275,0.000053635456,0.0038227534,0.0007508467,0.000037801852,0.020587735,0.96664286,0.00031164405],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0063208435,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020227977,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8823792,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000788898,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021110289,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999885},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4240002370","doi":"10.7202/1069819ar","title":"TABLE DE LA JURISPRUDENCE","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue du notariat","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Samsung; Hydro-Québec; Autorité des Marchés Financiers; Parks Canada; Shell Canada; Mozilla Foundation; China Scholarship Council; Bombardier; Curtin University of Technology; University of Pennsylvania","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Table (database); Political science; Law; Computer science; Database","score_opus":0.015007255057697387,"score_gpt":0.31191293048508956,"score_spread":0.29690567542739216,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4240002370","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5603683,0.02689926,0.0020662781,0.04117602,0.008357625,0.0006894401,0.00005926369,0.00012156725,0.36026224],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9283223,0.0036008526,0.00123338,0.00031387625,0.0015869684,0.000024710624,0.0000025527652,0.000014259152,0.064901106],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99764603,0.00063505856,0.00028619525,0.00044182723,0.00036441462,0.00062647165],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99807334,0.0011154781,0.00014936067,0.0002838205,0.0002091527,0.00016883995],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012624235,0.00022939726,0.00038010484,0.000060359474,0.00051662844,0.000143285,0.0004879262,0.00022014156,0.0021455355],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00057335966,0.000261805,0.00014545552,0.0006783603,0.0012207688,0.00051619764,0.00020856613,0.00042495478,0.005031805],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016796866,0.00012594824,0.15526168,0.000087911845,0.00006817908,0.00004075339,0.008260836,0.00083284086,0.00026508817,0.81940705,0.014121968,0.0015109729],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000283938,0.000048453745,0.034926046,0.0003784379,0.00006560897,0.00003252609,0.0017997371,0.00084102544,0.00006576493,0.008107777,0.9531092,0.00034146584],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036478715,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009611294,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93898726,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00051124464,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010161625,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99998343},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4240167526","doi":"10.7202/1061835ar","title":"TABLE DE LA JURISPRUDENCE","year":2018,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue du notariat","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"AstraZeneca (Canada)","funders":"Mozilla Foundation; China Scholarship Council; Enerkem","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Table (database); Political science; Computer science; Law; Database","score_opus":0.024994561763833016,"score_gpt":0.344840302799438,"score_spread":0.319845741035605,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4240167526","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.29465932,0.029205117,0.015369192,0.08314222,0.01318384,0.00066446123,0.000096987285,0.00022919806,0.5634497],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95663357,0.0028566131,0.0027704134,0.000436782,0.0069380742,0.000027602826,0.0000017619066,0.000014401999,0.030320752],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975854,0.0006842426,0.00029182553,0.0004301564,0.00034048417,0.0006678935],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99812704,0.0008533286,0.00014615354,0.00026091083,0.0004119361,0.0002006197],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013867433,0.00022790996,0.0003228653,0.00006238952,0.0012697445,0.00015738062,0.0005068393,0.00021695887,0.0015172685],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001173443,0.00025908634,0.000119158336,0.00082358177,0.0048049353,0.00046721066,0.00022431958,0.00033784215,0.0026403272],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022558985,0.00014771211,0.039718065,0.00004205608,0.000075378484,0.000053303327,0.016580256,0.00005722933,0.0002147418,0.8899581,0.049691625,0.0034389875],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020002564,0.000079785605,0.020061465,0.00029696,0.000079143596,0.000040082163,0.0013877398,0.0005732026,0.00017432305,0.013540076,0.963257,0.00031018167],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0045731035,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0036763777,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9135654,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00047497102,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010709595,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999861},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4243864889","doi":"10.47623/ivap-rvap.82.2008.2.07","title":"Derechos fundamentales en el sistema constitucional canadiense: entre la Carta constitucional y los códigos provinciale","year":2008,"lang":"eu","type":"article","venue":"DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Derecho; Philosophy","score_opus":0.25667961312747356,"score_gpt":0.5644755498180939,"score_spread":0.30779593669062033,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4243864889","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7979172,0.0516958,0.0003690827,0.0018595097,0.0036202415,0.0029130348,0.0023722514,0.00010724169,0.13914569],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9810296,0.014776031,0.00030440313,0.0004006402,0.0009850294,0.0001411658,0.000051858606,0.000047762034,0.0022634785],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99104935,0.0018700417,0.0018705927,0.0012112082,0.002802042,0.001196763],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99176383,0.0032656477,0.0016877755,0.00054465927,0.0017742742,0.0009637881],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023807622,0.0009094588,0.0018329509,0.0009917411,0.003596257,0.0012301162,0.0039873947,0.00038999677,0.017229838],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002221223,0.000912378,0.00055231154,0.0019075689,0.008113336,0.003266961,0.0019465326,0.0010725879,0.00013504118],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00039061773,0.0010386885,0.82152873,0.00024009823,0.0013102493,0.0009883716,0.0064347167,0.0007693132,0.002491354,0.050456543,0.11287255,0.0014787505],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002587408,0.000053498054,0.48801148,0.0034698562,0.0006774196,0.00067587005,0.007838673,0.0001228211,0.0020334928,0.004095297,0.48791355,0.0025206509],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017516967,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.035236064,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.375041,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015310019,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010896155,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998067},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4246970040","doi":"10.7202/1045641ar","title":"TABLE DE LA JURISPRUDENCE","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue du notariat","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"China Scholarship Council; Fraternal Order of Eagles","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Table (database); Political science; Philosophy; Law; Computer science; Data mining","score_opus":0.021085988014077472,"score_gpt":0.3311181194447752,"score_spread":0.31003213143069774,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4246970040","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2326559,0.08186797,0.0105256885,0.24150853,0.0058543873,0.00071198394,0.00010226233,0.00024969547,0.4265236],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9426196,0.006960714,0.0052233455,0.0005752703,0.0052354555,0.00003608449,0.0000023340447,0.000014809591,0.03933239],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976255,0.00061935233,0.0003263763,0.0004070561,0.00035616785,0.00066552614],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99826145,0.0009371502,0.00014507423,0.00023503526,0.0002110453,0.00021021425],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013034408,0.00023794408,0.00033862254,0.00006323067,0.0008992174,0.00015127141,0.00047715442,0.0002159375,0.0012380743],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000825456,0.0002762026,0.00014292293,0.0006563261,0.0018345962,0.0006455522,0.00018067226,0.00042919978,0.002031451],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015859483,0.00023178867,0.027896482,0.00004468677,0.00007324644,0.00004895131,0.013523455,0.0022948652,0.00014145256,0.90026724,0.043330234,0.012131709],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022727628,0.000026332276,0.012680187,0.0002314629,0.00007668209,0.000043007778,0.0010527326,0.0013497456,0.000094694726,0.004417013,0.9794878,0.00031306772],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026521727,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0037132541,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9361576,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00073628814,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009654563,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999969},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4249310468","doi":"10.7202/1045334ar","title":"TABLE DE LA JURISPRUDENCE","year":2008,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue du notariat","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"China Scholarship Council","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Table (database); Philosophy; Political science; Law; Computer science; Data mining","score_opus":0.0363247591356911,"score_gpt":0.32201735261452197,"score_spread":0.28569259347883086,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4249310468","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5681941,0.057909466,0.008117944,0.05981067,0.00689986,0.00061087596,0.00008628972,0.00021534185,0.2981555],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9418844,0.015191353,0.0023116337,0.0003104918,0.00244341,0.000034722692,0.000002452437,0.000014309124,0.037807204],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99755466,0.00068120414,0.00031216638,0.00041264162,0.00039149146,0.0006478352],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981383,0.0010183397,0.00014480333,0.00024025858,0.00024470355,0.00021359127],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009193688,0.00023939605,0.0003724475,0.000064431246,0.0015718653,0.00006798563,0.0004613119,0.0002161582,0.00074234215],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009925418,0.00027740307,0.00015283811,0.0007857004,0.0033561108,0.0004919153,0.00017992177,0.00043255222,0.0012238615],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021482709,0.00025444318,0.13433124,0.000056067256,0.00009038421,0.0004361816,0.024541847,0.0007641902,0.00014163522,0.77960837,0.05844245,0.0013117242],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002513357,0.000038900405,0.054178376,0.00021768748,0.00006175985,0.00024556144,0.0010767087,0.00043305848,0.00007261536,0.0050697005,0.93800735,0.0003469189],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0050601307,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011741655,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87956494,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005091922,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014307972,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999678},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4251654352","doi":"10.7202/1043524ar","title":"TABLE DE LA JURISPRUDENCE","year":2016,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue du notariat","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"China Scholarship Council","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Philosophy; Political science; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.022291547419637306,"score_gpt":0.3221360226563859,"score_spread":0.2998444752367486,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4251654352","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2740966,0.04686003,0.04239358,0.32393894,0.011396867,0.0008340403,0.00023102846,0.00029679862,0.2999521],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9325654,0.008773679,0.001370204,0.00024166597,0.0024709573,0.000038320475,7.125742e-7,0.000013980229,0.054525103],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975695,0.00072161964,0.00029426947,0.00042257117,0.00033627395,0.0006557792],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973084,0.0018511795,0.00014744565,0.00025279794,0.00023366172,0.00020656319],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012900842,0.00022546765,0.00032447284,0.00005803189,0.00071279774,0.00009452621,0.00047447172,0.00020445968,0.001301881],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001561483,0.00018993103,0.00013635641,0.00053012307,0.0025506036,0.0005751951,0.00019792495,0.00021565045,0.0018982887],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018300916,0.00011892437,0.060267273,0.000034517598,0.00006643889,0.00007063856,0.0045987484,0.00003741881,0.00081722904,0.89437306,0.02823736,0.011360079],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003208713,0.000036867717,0.02356023,0.000627795,0.00006617956,0.000036363588,0.00057584065,0.00005416769,0.00019280346,0.019253522,0.95496213,0.00031319665],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002112359,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014265545,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9267248,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006456122,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009818174,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996111},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4283020440","doi":"10.22201/cisan.24487228e.2022.2.526","title":"La gobernanza de la British Columbia Assembly of First Nations: una estrategia para salir de la Ley India","year":2022,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Norteamérica","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Art","score_opus":0.0179012092521432,"score_gpt":0.3402953360641047,"score_spread":0.3223941268119615,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4283020440","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7271902,0.0013587255,0.00006652462,0.00040024723,0.00017358571,0.00034002512,0.00027766943,0.000073512194,0.27011952],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9948807,0.003160167,0.00029246553,0.00007474059,0.00016434309,0.00023845442,0.000014253305,0.000020650301,0.0011542736],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.995137,0.0024224394,0.0004828829,0.00045154185,0.00097017223,0.0005359646],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9943792,0.0045955246,0.00039591047,0.00022031831,0.00023532874,0.0001737017],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022067167,0.00020026545,0.00043379536,0.00012110318,0.0029803917,0.0007745285,0.000730517,0.00019836877,0.000584674],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014377277,0.00032778952,0.00020247504,0.0014273189,0.002716386,0.00026273786,0.00037162728,0.0006922137,0.000023347056],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024927902,0.0010315037,0.8743124,0.000114579874,0.00025693883,0.00029688666,0.0120742405,0.00044327136,0.00011420947,0.07604281,0.032801665,0.0024865884],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004914253,0.00010334829,0.69027823,0.00021481543,0.000082915685,0.000089706475,0.010900242,0.000055886136,0.000014515412,0.0029957977,0.29443794,0.00033520034],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.115176044,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16336086,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26896524,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007668161,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002728179,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999977},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4285722593","doi":"10.7202/1088130ar","title":"L’importance des peuples autochtones et afro-descendants dans la construction de la notion de communauté en droit colombien","year":2020,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue de droit Université de Sherbrooke","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.021938771096193455,"score_gpt":0.27541662488609214,"score_spread":0.2534778537898987,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4285722593","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8082362,0.0021681755,0.016868286,0.0062308423,0.00019605506,0.00036531547,0.000117241754,0.00019977259,0.16561812],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9823776,0.006524793,0.006314725,0.00028908157,0.00025866533,0.000012462347,0.000018263474,0.000028892699,0.0041755405],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966361,0.0014713492,0.00032698148,0.0004780231,0.00032544552,0.0007621069],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99768233,0.0012507166,0.00025409737,0.00021568674,0.00017268228,0.00042445684],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011417326,0.00031776936,0.00045362808,0.00009818987,0.0012812705,0.00012194223,0.0006228781,0.00036000172,0.00018978001],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00060982275,0.0004615062,0.00022970233,0.0006500971,0.0040393234,0.00055181526,0.00029107791,0.00063408364,0.0000610993],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013512534,0.00013386329,0.174635,0.00022851548,0.00018823044,0.00044835906,0.097385325,0.0024858904,0.0045014145,0.7169278,0.00064215524,0.0022883164],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019190182,0.0002966632,0.64463997,0.0021098393,0.0007770133,0.0011748726,0.08900085,0.0112314215,0.0026428255,0.04348136,0.20137739,0.0013488001],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020190156,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012012473,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6734465,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0055022417,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011627814,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997837},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4287731372","doi":"10.11144/javeriana.10554.41009","title":"Las mutaciones dentro de la constitución política de Colombia de 1991","year":2020,"lang":"es","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Optech (Canada)","funders":"United Nations","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.018412159573627088,"score_gpt":0.38348953181268425,"score_spread":0.3650773722390572,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4287731372","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.38098893,0.0023386336,0.003273662,0.013206122,0.0015898793,0.0012717952,0.00014825501,0.00044868223,0.59673405],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9895023,0.002483682,0.0019849914,0.0006839753,0.0005719929,0.00013103201,0.00012760426,0.000024433313,0.0044899834],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99597216,0.0011106131,0.0005312208,0.00066221604,0.00079386955,0.00092990603],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99646395,0.0021511298,0.0003147449,0.00018554094,0.00039530988,0.000489291],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009535185,0.0005101051,0.0007160297,0.00016258526,0.0017058135,0.00040934412,0.00068661675,0.0005232596,0.0007727637],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025370587,0.0005328418,0.00031813054,0.00064468855,0.0027572182,0.0002464392,0.0001339007,0.000661576,0.0005567027],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016324151,0.00020347783,0.037516512,0.00012512898,0.00035297868,0.00014879482,0.02815304,0.000044185042,0.0018189471,0.9211436,0.009727422,0.0006026898],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018185525,0.00031230904,0.16240963,0.0010304452,0.0012695071,0.000085401014,0.15504502,0.00083042774,0.0042466167,0.04305941,0.62770814,0.002184537],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007229745,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011094371,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8780842,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00091000483,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0046210946,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999567},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4287732392","doi":"10.11144/javeriana.10554.50851","title":"El dilema de la nulidad de las sentencias de la Corte Constitucional en sede de revisión de tutela","year":2020,"lang":"es","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Optech (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Derecho; Political science","score_opus":0.016036867668256592,"score_gpt":0.38989209339844744,"score_spread":0.37385522573019087,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4287732392","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.57520133,0.0026314016,0.015760621,0.004228778,0.0007535891,0.0010754906,0.0002511033,0.00037894314,0.39971876],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9826193,0.0052756174,0.0058536944,0.0013069769,0.0012047119,0.00018251518,0.00015751313,0.00004381134,0.0033558507],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99275017,0.003168501,0.0007779839,0.0009062305,0.0011140079,0.0012830821],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9924783,0.005556274,0.00048242492,0.0002595646,0.000523301,0.0007001294],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032240974,0.00073827984,0.0009507407,0.0002162791,0.001583798,0.00051320036,0.0009620905,0.0008333853,0.0007115319],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0053782663,0.0007625527,0.0005213529,0.0007272599,0.0029264763,0.0003432932,0.00020719807,0.0012942699,0.00028079786],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022199552,0.00028929533,0.21614139,0.00033142776,0.00058036036,0.00054142077,0.044928975,0.00026087748,0.0035795337,0.7169347,0.015172096,0.001017922],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017733057,0.00020313992,0.58869004,0.0028224522,0.0011919247,0.00045011527,0.0985553,0.0019195648,0.0028231565,0.031011218,0.26818162,0.0023781802],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0057940986,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004227558,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6859235,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020176438,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013288481,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999787},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4289782184","doi":"10.21017/rev.repub.2022.v32.a125","title":"EL DERECHO NATURAL EN LA CONSTITUCIÓN POLÍTICA DE COLOMBIA, UNA VISIÓN DESDE LOS POSTULADOS DE JAVIER HERVADA","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revista Republicana","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Optech (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Dialogical self; Argumentative; Epistemology; Humanities; Natural (archaeology); Politics; Philosophy; Legal positivism; Political science; Law; Philosophy of law; Sociology; Comparative law; Geography","score_opus":0.014967396066036474,"score_gpt":0.3648676905595998,"score_spread":0.3499002944935633,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4289782184","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6216916,0.015470634,0.0018337953,0.05895305,0.00094905944,0.0026106336,0.0004238213,0.00073134823,0.29733604],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9944435,0.0002282182,0.0008474502,0.0014288921,0.0002025583,0.00016622344,0.00001836644,0.000017512219,0.0026472828],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99572283,0.001726744,0.00039114684,0.0005100461,0.0008641894,0.0007850618],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976667,0.0011390374,0.00019243568,0.00035582035,0.00031772733,0.00032826938],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023559304,0.00023440568,0.00040087246,0.00017275003,0.0020345494,0.00032341105,0.0008129891,0.00008591201,0.0012831578],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026985663,0.00025600562,0.00018553315,0.0010377596,0.0012630592,0.00031056642,0.00047627703,0.00066277094,0.000027114931],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000043559114,0.00013970707,0.031794827,0.0000319697,0.00013337852,0.00011327874,0.002931686,0.00002355519,0.00038613897,0.9330275,0.0268027,0.004571693],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035664378,0.00005643535,0.021078568,0.00006965583,0.0000635589,0.00008895032,0.0051968773,0.00013009713,0.000030472023,0.0035810368,0.96895236,0.0003953604],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0048610587,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024685918,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94214964,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002184298,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004188275,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999892},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4293228088","doi":"10.31672/60.4","title":"LA HUMANIZACIÓN DEL DERECHO INTERNACIONAL PÚBLICO Y DEL DERECHO INTERNACIONAL PRIVADO","year":2022,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"revista de derecho público","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Optech (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Derecho; International law; Normative; Order (exchange); Law; Conflict of laws; Political science; Private law; Human rights; Humanities; Public law; Philosophy; Economics","score_opus":0.03694159231555253,"score_gpt":0.3590153476992917,"score_spread":0.32207375538373917,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4293228088","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.80867755,0.030508947,0.01408706,0.020324508,0.0036812809,0.00351646,0.0017755658,0.0011737704,0.11625485],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9863453,0.0035598848,0.0010486379,0.0017165641,0.0013357757,0.0005862931,0.00015962488,0.00013963705,0.0051082675],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9875466,0.003807769,0.0017197409,0.0019415758,0.0030718632,0.0019124509],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9938076,0.00214237,0.0010751215,0.0010695341,0.0011069033,0.0007984281],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.004044834,0.001226502,0.0014637398,0.0010124809,0.0043828897,0.0017491347,0.0035183807,0.0004920513,0.0073035895],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00204463,0.0013840402,0.00090901426,0.0026066995,0.0024162605,0.0009465153,0.0033456385,0.002982023,0.001142207],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00034729656,0.0014905928,0.08741754,0.00026256498,0.0011167915,0.00037240156,0.008713813,0.00016745561,0.0007672771,0.81549,0.058204122,0.025650125],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015259889,0.0002659788,0.015793495,0.00067947054,0.00030671782,0.00039323114,0.007643129,0.0006083486,0.00015586968,0.00749778,0.96350914,0.0016208779],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009077337,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00045945137,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90530497,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004077505,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032357865,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99974567},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4297862563","doi":"10.56657/2.1.1","title":"La Significatividad de las Cuestiones del Significado","year":2022,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Elenkhos - Revista de la Sociedad Filosófica del Uruguay","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Medicine","score_opus":0.02170424297295202,"score_gpt":0.342018118231643,"score_spread":0.320313875258691,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4297862563","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6821932,0.059880752,0.01014566,0.014293228,0.0011619008,0.0041230656,0.0020752233,0.0014752441,0.22465168],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98625946,0.0050686356,0.0019247943,0.0007440894,0.0008057274,0.0008923691,0.00006568726,0.000098835386,0.0041403887],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9857047,0.008026907,0.0011598379,0.0014375241,0.0020508526,0.001620159],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9915775,0.005671611,0.00084411824,0.0008553861,0.00049224915,0.00055914046],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0073484927,0.0008681282,0.0011031239,0.0002970688,0.0053882417,0.0011318626,0.0019649116,0.00050624233,0.0016570564],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018015234,0.0009795954,0.0008104979,0.0016425449,0.0048914775,0.00047649504,0.0007036647,0.0024176661,0.00042992618],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022997496,0.0018779106,0.05297807,0.00033774727,0.0007644655,0.0003007846,0.0524017,0.0006445988,0.0033763452,0.79363716,0.08488105,0.008570196],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009407214,0.00021148578,0.024170911,0.00028107286,0.00043937445,0.000082161314,0.018678382,0.00060543633,0.00014270801,0.005579615,0.94755226,0.0013158543],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00058221334,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003474492,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8626712,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023201446,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028843966,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99990505},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4307237984","doi":"10.26443/glsars.v2i1.190","title":"Legal Pluralism, Transitional Justice, and Ethnic Justice Systems","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill GLSA Research Series","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"International Labour Organization","keywords":"Legal pluralism; Jurisdiction; Indigenous; Political science; Law; Tribunal; Transitional justice; Pluralism (philosophy); Ethnic group; Redress; Sociology; Economic Justice; Legal profession; Legal realism","score_opus":0.19161802353145188,"score_gpt":0.4600137222489433,"score_spread":0.26839569871749147,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4307237984","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.32352972,0.01779326,0.0001485783,0.06986272,0.004730998,0.0029052803,0.0024359066,0.00051471527,0.5780788],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98885214,0.0008252362,0.00007618446,0.00015258545,0.00035193271,0.0003457678,0.000015003755,0.0000093052595,0.009371865],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99535525,0.0014925989,0.00022001541,0.00037013477,0.001948309,0.0006136781],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99807656,0.00092658104,0.00004357604,0.00014446682,0.0006299996,0.00017880702],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028489481,0.00012756087,0.00020688227,0.00021560851,0.01050145,0.00014916343,0.0003575066,0.000044067634,0.00040405022],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00071226293,0.0001315802,0.000047130634,0.0009635688,0.0028229035,0.0006391156,0.00040224852,0.00063415506,0.000037211066],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012233134,0.00004473941,0.00005288992,0.0000909356,0.000032812815,0.000064486536,0.0049629994,0.0003349816,0.00022736198,0.98497003,0.008811053,0.00028538858],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021166042,0.00012277556,0.0014206576,0.000023827584,0.000054282733,0.000025752086,0.10697463,0.00006399841,0.0000200997,0.0020060544,0.88889796,0.00017831882],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027193062,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029171219,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.982964,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00041267957,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00046815292,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99989086},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4312258376","doi":"10.18041/0124-0021/dialogos.53.2020.9186","title":"El dilema democrático de la refrendación directa de los acuerdos de paz","year":2020,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Diálogos de saberes","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy; Physics","score_opus":0.027974912445485268,"score_gpt":0.3877296736695975,"score_spread":0.3597547612241122,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4312258376","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90290225,0.005158715,0.0017011275,0.017996673,0.00030059056,0.00053124176,0.00022305032,0.00032428338,0.07086206],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.992033,0.002764353,0.001183463,0.0022551513,0.0013104191,0.00009385258,0.000008414316,0.00003597498,0.00031536203],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99501973,0.0017878928,0.00048235548,0.00069069804,0.0006681259,0.0013511906],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99637914,0.0021855629,0.00023843223,0.0002963387,0.0001962342,0.0007043129],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011540692,0.0004736445,0.00064052216,0.00010057862,0.0011790502,0.00038369556,0.000944724,0.00034489154,0.0004327874],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003901415,0.00047765562,0.00031091718,0.00069645024,0.0022829068,0.0002986799,0.0004359378,0.0006831204,0.00026965849],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017314657,0.00030540966,0.672357,0.00020499121,0.0004713194,0.00029404138,0.035204392,0.00020002498,0.007954735,0.25107452,0.026545934,0.0052144155],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001335191,0.00027937774,0.6383783,0.0006717584,0.0005649777,0.00006166719,0.009987095,0.0017218526,0.0067309565,0.03570549,0.30315033,0.0014129481],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016150477,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008178811,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2766044,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008365552,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020185364,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99976754},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4313887162","doi":"10.4067/s0718-52002022000200071","title":"¿Cómo Conciliar la Libertad Religiosa con las Normas Antidiscriminación? Tres Mecanismos y sus Fundamentos en el Sistema Jurídico Chileno","year":2022,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Estudios constitucionales","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Discovery Air (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Physics","score_opus":0.021046541034752852,"score_gpt":0.33317637540940637,"score_spread":0.3121298343746535,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4313887162","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.75442755,0.018877335,0.00008073231,0.01640445,0.0033766532,0.0026527743,0.0015091313,0.00041374462,0.20225763],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9869323,0.0066247997,0.00017581288,0.0006391966,0.000801139,0.0007091005,0.000105636645,0.000053520846,0.003958515],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9903104,0.002665329,0.0013269333,0.0015179714,0.0029230805,0.001256301],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9933358,0.0041614794,0.00076817034,0.0006845446,0.00060723576,0.00044281466],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021744512,0.001022236,0.0014795341,0.00044540805,0.00621699,0.00037794939,0.001472506,0.00025366936,0.0011863704],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012770757,0.0010700114,0.00067044335,0.0011576319,0.0060584918,0.00061910826,0.0018298542,0.0011507863,0.0005057783],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00032720756,0.0009828679,0.0656816,0.00017800361,0.0011061757,0.00052086514,0.015881337,0.00023674367,0.0004518172,0.8916183,0.02201602,0.0009990499],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0025565026,0.00057406735,0.06856848,0.00052258244,0.0007544177,0.00023535347,0.03361084,0.000044794153,0.00027279515,0.0028015913,0.8884829,0.0015756167],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010768214,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025365495,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8888167,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012343,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004015527,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99972665},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4320162470","doi":"10.7202/1095691ar","title":"TABLE DE LA JURISPRUDENCE","year":2021,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue du notariat","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Table (database); Political science; Philosophy; Computer science; Law; Data mining","score_opus":0.024052541106897293,"score_gpt":0.3323852070102007,"score_spread":0.3083326659033034,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4320162470","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20932142,0.14636265,0.012593144,0.16787046,0.011495893,0.0004585391,0.0001488907,0.00019154325,0.45155746],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9160923,0.012939507,0.0039403937,0.00058028096,0.0028521924,0.000032318374,0.000006432969,0.00001606186,0.06354055],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99730855,0.0009809843,0.0002965599,0.00046182587,0.00035366337,0.0005984338],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977968,0.001186799,0.00012076233,0.00026912888,0.00043094423,0.00019557148],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010177543,0.0002145486,0.0003609425,0.00003990577,0.00087914674,0.00019332474,0.00034372474,0.00021152987,0.0015700948],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017695383,0.000262752,0.00016049108,0.0009690382,0.0015479351,0.00040727863,0.0002598766,0.00042579125,0.0009080141],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009081615,0.00021434622,0.038284928,0.00007764377,0.00009661222,0.0005024465,0.009328814,0.00052341644,0.0004159212,0.92100143,0.026726564,0.0028188128],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021630393,0.000018458099,0.017662253,0.00036147505,0.00010145189,0.00012280344,0.00273319,0.00037503638,0.00035290758,0.013199558,0.9645457,0.0003108178],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021653392,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002940569,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9378192,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00049748615,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023116209,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999825},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4320514247","doi":"10.17118/11143/19152","title":"L’importance des peuples autochtones et afro-descendants dans la construction de la notion de communauté en droit colombien","year":2021,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue de droit Université de Sherbrooke","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Parks and Wilderness Society","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.017418781850468794,"score_gpt":0.2786432881529214,"score_spread":0.2612245063024526,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4320514247","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.77781,0.0035586965,0.011069356,0.0024133285,0.00028171093,0.00023370898,0.00010169341,0.00013225425,0.20439929],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9629575,0.011423248,0.008587726,0.00013739399,0.00020625259,0.000013414551,0.000029256942,0.000028469896,0.016616752],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961702,0.0018779349,0.0003273658,0.00049031177,0.0003331319,0.00080106227],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973302,0.001540366,0.00023566611,0.00030019783,0.00028883267,0.00030477086],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014188738,0.00030766442,0.00044977278,0.00011815836,0.0014500946,0.00014504095,0.0004950784,0.00039209993,0.0002642771],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00063683034,0.00045923036,0.000248093,0.0006977157,0.0039205444,0.0005335329,0.00031122688,0.00060680765,0.0000443941],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000068896494,0.00021312472,0.17980392,0.00019054851,0.00020899954,0.0009850238,0.051825307,0.0017014575,0.0059201685,0.7560125,0.0004138553,0.0026561907],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013997767,0.00011432505,0.6895238,0.0024532918,0.0006417439,0.002842059,0.07866517,0.003197696,0.004819465,0.06612398,0.14919098,0.001027713],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002160468,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.033796676,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.68988854,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0074393125,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019448127,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99984986},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4323519087","doi":"10.17118/11143/19916","title":"Quelques réflexions sur la constitutionnalisation du droit et le constitutionnalisme au sein de l’État","year":2022,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue de droit Université de Sherbrooke","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Political science; Humanities; Art","score_opus":0.023276432318642137,"score_gpt":0.26888342814857263,"score_spread":0.2456069958299305,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4323519087","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1812898,0.008286323,0.07076022,0.063729055,0.0017024821,0.000855204,0.0006051273,0.00034993977,0.6724219],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96250653,0.0017750212,0.00075687736,0.001432906,0.00044755117,0.000049873073,0.00007498491,0.000021793758,0.03293443],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9958817,0.0015753625,0.00042208002,0.0006177197,0.00057908235,0.0009240683],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978835,0.0007457129,0.0003085209,0.00030661593,0.00035114976,0.0004044788],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021108054,0.00034881636,0.00046786343,0.00027486306,0.0047157733,0.00009373978,0.0006499695,0.00022743238,0.0011028943],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00050779356,0.0005433908,0.0003504427,0.0009515695,0.004315932,0.0008534887,0.00054010755,0.00072570273,0.0000970121],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010859248,0.000320288,0.013081259,0.00009758736,0.0002213204,0.0006017943,0.012948603,0.027468445,0.00043843527,0.94021034,0.003972572,0.00053077744],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013114415,0.00011315711,0.009652584,0.00039741295,0.00031539943,0.0009911384,0.011032714,0.0032579876,0.0002240811,0.07358052,0.8983906,0.00073297805],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023208797,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01877379,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.894418,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017462032,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0092279725,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998102},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4360609899","doi":"10.38116/9786556350486cap1","title":"DEMASIADO CONOCIDO PARA IGNORARLO, DEMASIADO NUEVO PARA RECONOCERLO: LA CONDICIÓN DEL DERECHO HUMANO AL AGUA A NIVEL MUNDIA","year":2023,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Livros","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Optech (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.08318372939461795,"score_gpt":0.4015641302636914,"score_spread":0.3183804008690735,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4360609899","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.85183215,0.006338815,0.000620958,0.0119644245,0.002374242,0.002337203,0.00049839285,0.001066169,0.12296764],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98501384,0.0053207832,0.00042350776,0.0013469597,0.00083579577,0.00036379506,0.00006728166,0.000075175645,0.006552858],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99328834,0.0012032917,0.0011589349,0.0014927486,0.0011621843,0.0016944876],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99488205,0.0027087817,0.0006411117,0.00070605567,0.00050416874,0.0005578424],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017784802,0.0008963704,0.0013016431,0.0004939145,0.0027833711,0.0006275602,0.0012804354,0.00057770335,0.0011989436],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010854432,0.0009607783,0.00057186914,0.0019084766,0.0044402224,0.00093978137,0.00062659604,0.0007747288,0.0062795845],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028717626,0.0007978463,0.44612214,0.0002821238,0.0016905109,0.0007431782,0.035545677,0.00022492703,0.0014249587,0.30769137,0.19151561,0.01367448],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0023895616,0.00038554467,0.47660828,0.0009413609,0.00043233525,0.00005345463,0.030815424,0.0006641057,0.00042849794,0.012601532,0.47254127,0.0021386403],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002859081,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020879372,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.29508984,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00041573995,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013711804,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997141},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4372055443","doi":"10.18800/9789972428883.010","title":"Notas personales sobre el doctor Fernando de Trazegnies Granda","year":2009,"lang":"es","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Encana (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Art; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04774778595040031,"score_gpt":0.35378055830032873,"score_spread":0.30603277234992843,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4372055443","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0054515637,0.0047445716,0.00017815961,0.0063073,0.0006886135,0.00066224387,0.00020867419,0.0001896335,0.98156923],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5558427,0.03142384,0.00047995392,0.00076931005,0.001899415,0.000035003748,0.000022894232,0.000035308705,0.40949157],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99621767,0.00013990531,0.0006111265,0.0008463554,0.001358344,0.0008266239],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997835,0.0006664288,0.00033011,0.00028982016,0.0005550335,0.00032364487],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00055605447,0.00080874725,0.0010436092,0.00022453374,0.0019969125,0.00032986968,0.0007500832,0.0004312889,0.0026223117],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022282611,0.0007062859,0.00071179966,0.00013462064,0.0037926321,0.00035592532,0.0001542876,0.00060686504,0.0010967131],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010376185,0.00007237765,0.0013006331,0.00003826139,0.0003144193,0.000055418284,0.0076716924,0.000004999953,0.000051062674,0.9696426,0.004481553,0.016263241],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007230797,0.00018788408,0.008427954,0.0006271967,0.00028988783,0.000017007744,0.002661372,0.00000849687,0.000053878637,0.05426996,0.93164384,0.0010894415],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017600412,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007649612,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9271623,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004727667,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001113083,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99968106},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4376461794","doi":"10.7764/r.483.4","title":"El Congreso Nacional y la interpretación constitucional en el proceso legislativo: criterios y momentos","year":2022,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Revista Chilena de Derecho","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.01675891498004329,"score_gpt":0.3616723546161334,"score_spread":0.3449134396360901,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4376461794","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.671783,0.03471057,0.0031273132,0.032529544,0.0028779923,0.0047748475,0.0044251834,0.0006585221,0.24511304],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99415624,0.0020200012,0.00021007803,0.000929009,0.0008913955,0.00048335732,0.000078073186,0.000036739555,0.0011950878],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9931765,0.0023379393,0.00083589717,0.0009983345,0.0017066085,0.00094471074],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99631965,0.0020811432,0.00047383763,0.00040307583,0.00039046686,0.00033183966],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022329374,0.00059696275,0.0008221498,0.00032121036,0.002724262,0.0006269974,0.0011759943,0.00017579197,0.0025721667],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014101272,0.0006442452,0.0004159579,0.0008897775,0.0022910559,0.0005721005,0.0010876289,0.0012162088,0.00018592026],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021426889,0.00044620936,0.030544218,0.00027647003,0.0004694737,0.00013272188,0.018840466,0.00017030761,0.00033705728,0.93450546,0.010710317,0.0033530192],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00091940025,0.00016626432,0.012160966,0.0007169047,0.00016577494,0.00016913867,0.0054832334,0.00056326645,0.00003884207,0.0038654981,0.97492313,0.00082759286],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00014936214,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005336314,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9642128,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013420156,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034194551,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996009},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4378978164","doi":"10.3167/hrrh.2023.490206","title":"L'influence des organisations internationales sur les politiques publiques de l'enseignement supérieur au Mexique et la configuration des programmes d’études du diplôme de Droit","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Historical Reflections/Réflexions Historiques","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Explication; Philosophy","score_opus":0.07501901933836283,"score_gpt":0.38910692040299805,"score_spread":0.31408790106463524,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4378978164","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.673965,0.0037365663,0.082440466,0.035499252,0.001018391,0.0015675875,0.00008245967,0.005072808,0.19661748],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9806802,0.0039145104,0.0056713554,0.0003399905,0.00048045933,0.00080212177,0.000049226976,0.000041142684,0.008020954],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9959923,0.0013012355,0.0006270589,0.00056083756,0.0007239019,0.00079464214],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99518114,0.0014485562,0.00025529618,0.00025564383,0.00249658,0.00036278518],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020554194,0.00034397148,0.0003762743,0.00068182003,0.0041049183,0.00030479164,0.0004712196,0.00024856505,0.000094147945],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007853384,0.0003844222,0.00021382354,0.001424221,0.002010108,0.0012467307,0.00012020171,0.0004167446,0.000042268854],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003761674,0.0003065099,0.011003781,0.00004207772,0.00009017158,0.000018278997,0.07847662,0.00016284607,0.0017703497,0.8938984,0.013127155,0.0010661392],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019112561,0.00019458454,0.03118148,0.00018846321,0.00006635959,0.000026995212,0.007410837,0.000042701224,0.0008110619,0.17009652,0.78929245,0.00049744366],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07699165,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14352849,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.77616525,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.033449136,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0055097574,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99986076},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386947533","doi":"10.18046/recs.i40.5672","title":"Constitucionalismo dialógico y justicia constitucional. Una vuelta larga para volver a las virtudes deliberativas de la Acción Pública de Inconstitucionalidad","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revista CS","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.04240367918298141,"score_gpt":0.4145469089745717,"score_spread":0.3721432297915903,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386947533","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.49423867,0.011491269,0.030524345,0.0404108,0.0019925882,0.0038954627,0.001410035,0.0033888055,0.41264802],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9919534,0.0020326567,0.0017973625,0.0011690035,0.0008724554,0.0002132729,0.00008392245,0.000030499188,0.0018474666],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99514014,0.001311991,0.00065226085,0.0007226435,0.0011187118,0.0010542796],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99433833,0.00400974,0.00024999684,0.0003897536,0.0005173139,0.0004948449],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029420557,0.0004568258,0.00065547845,0.00036135822,0.0020958816,0.00052411645,0.0007755745,0.00030634765,0.00072645745],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0046061636,0.00046138465,0.00029390558,0.0015905538,0.0045584124,0.0005058286,0.00040601392,0.0005338937,0.0010122565],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004503289,0.00013320235,0.017549882,0.000053591044,0.0001655155,0.00023994723,0.0028695697,0.00024203653,0.0004216914,0.9287212,0.04893108,0.00062723213],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007862841,0.000032347354,0.016924556,0.00055960903,0.00016322451,0.000090663605,0.0022884985,0.00015750484,0.00020247904,0.0145466225,0.9635162,0.0007320569],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00036447172,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00067367055,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91458505,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007117214,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0047735237,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997838},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388711186","doi":"10.5154/r.rga.2013.50-51.07","title":"Usos y costumbres en las comunidades indígenas bajo la teoría del Neoconstitucionalismo","year":2013,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Revista de Geografía Agrícola","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Context (archaeology); Philosophy; Geography","score_opus":0.01300447784558175,"score_gpt":0.3182668526696566,"score_spread":0.30526237482407487,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388711186","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.81638163,0.01977705,0.0007200283,0.012194965,0.000721957,0.0038184559,0.00028054422,0.0004125319,0.14569283],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9898299,0.004912826,0.00081600196,0.0008069055,0.00086389185,0.00046135669,0.000035341167,0.000039800016,0.002233962],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99331504,0.00225894,0.0009255138,0.00091535965,0.0012895622,0.0012955988],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9940441,0.0032158722,0.00047544588,0.00063084945,0.0010384212,0.0005952634],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020104118,0.0007330711,0.0010045848,0.0003367958,0.0019551313,0.0023449704,0.0013873698,0.00046102575,0.0013579073],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018874768,0.0007043315,0.00050351955,0.0012712664,0.0041101635,0.0009936169,0.00073125825,0.0008902717,0.002111204],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003648111,0.0003938419,0.20520885,0.00020261922,0.0004664783,0.00007434921,0.004563804,0.00004573788,0.00051384285,0.74750125,0.032937318,0.00805541],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006263411,0.00008980361,0.22529753,0.0008205306,0.00021964926,0.00003887258,0.003976952,0.00013106987,0.00004901922,0.0028674721,0.7650511,0.00083164766],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0060775597,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00057386607,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7446338,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00060974364,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017121307,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999555},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388846332","doi":"10.4324/9780429020858-3","title":"Justicia Canadiana","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Geography","score_opus":0.11678828579766382,"score_gpt":0.3652029325472548,"score_spread":0.24841464674959096,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388846332","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000018049993,0.00027444615,0.000037758233,0.0027175944,0.0010359037,0.00018002494,0.000041501142,0.00018212265,0.9955288],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0029570097,0.0006220261,0.000040634088,0.0002296315,0.0007153136,0.0000075386156,0.000007158372,0.000014870647,0.9954058],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988846,0.000014484268,0.00014985575,0.0002380923,0.00045696623,0.00025596438],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992128,0.0002555915,0.00005881356,0.00011992502,0.00020649473,0.00014634874],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00019442425,0.0001500168,0.00021733606,0.00013665957,0.00065705954,0.000041581,0.00023601696,0.00014629099,0.0037588621],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020043015,0.00015206101,0.000090854264,0.00005266443,0.00095277466,0.000048874113,0.000070915885,0.0001781433,0.006014952],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[5.5379866e-7,6.64117e-7,0.000014035075,0.000002729693,0.000035689904,0.00002406922,0.000518968,0.0000010397562,7.104061e-8,0.8480939,0.15013069,0.0011775527],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019083942,0.000003566931,0.0001527464,0.00004915489,0.000032330427,1.8321536e-7,0.0005062272,7.760289e-7,1.7366767e-7,0.0866819,0.91237766,0.000176226],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01939178,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.57998985,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7622469,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030985867,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014200098,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99715185},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390677204","doi":"10.6035/recerca.7238","title":"Estado de derecho e intervencionismo jurídico","year":2023,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Recerca Revista de pensament i anàlisi","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.061986651941859115,"score_gpt":0.3948349192354252,"score_spread":0.3328482672935661,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390677204","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8450359,0.011278444,0.002080018,0.041873213,0.0023480349,0.0019651246,0.0002455756,0.0009906987,0.094182976],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96424675,0.027408285,0.0004925799,0.0006115178,0.00072635396,0.00013109484,0.000034357785,0.000039471375,0.006309562],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99504375,0.0010837893,0.0007426413,0.0007764698,0.0010429921,0.0013103462],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974147,0.00093355443,0.00034169978,0.0004967727,0.00036972613,0.00044351275],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031582098,0.00047550004,0.0007030638,0.00033178844,0.0014373895,0.0010943962,0.0008881103,0.00024603234,0.00095829257],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015146998,0.0004916315,0.0004445155,0.0017795463,0.0012182016,0.00037864398,0.0005179486,0.00055984483,0.0027486691],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015648182,0.00049682433,0.07608084,0.00062235084,0.000565958,0.00030002955,0.022974083,0.00019521342,0.00091031584,0.6232592,0.20320714,0.07123156],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004560699,0.00015555936,0.038734328,0.001402629,0.00017968321,0.000015669295,0.008595213,0.00039710512,0.00019857519,0.0034369382,0.94576967,0.00065854134],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010160634,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00022854538,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.74256253,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002029181,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001391231,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99995494},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4393125330","doi":"10.62758/re.v2i1.186","title":"MEDIAÇÃO DA INFORMAÇÃO, PERSPECTIVA DOS COMUNS E PROTAGONISMO SOCIAL: ORGANICIDADES PARA INCLUSÃO, IGUALDADE E EQUIDADE SOCIAL","year":2023,"lang":"pt","type":"article","venue":"Revista EDICIC","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Sociology; Humanities; Art","score_opus":0.1435008814085627,"score_gpt":0.43165638686760033,"score_spread":0.2881555054590376,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4393125330","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.55237114,0.024576135,0.0015357566,0.25712702,0.008315416,0.014715803,0.0017102157,0.005477732,0.13417076],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98638654,0.0017379554,0.000019959916,0.00071310665,0.0058550504,0.00027286165,0.00011857485,0.00008679164,0.0048091626],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99182385,0.0010304732,0.0014434418,0.0011239629,0.0025562316,0.002022043],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99637926,0.0009785955,0.000875968,0.0004579525,0.0008627812,0.00044547283],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026358387,0.0009423124,0.0016143112,0.00060007605,0.007839564,0.001027961,0.0016696567,0.0005892058,0.0013849046],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017488425,0.0009423966,0.0006332618,0.0051477863,0.004971164,0.00097587105,0.0015619738,0.0013800869,0.00300928],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020715893,0.0003510246,0.0026528551,0.00071581017,0.0008688499,0.00018287005,0.36716488,0.000008356827,0.0016301125,0.34742188,0.27226,0.006536163],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017544632,0.00030214942,0.034950875,0.0007716675,0.0006434705,0.00001567916,0.3904064,0.00025304235,0.0002544917,0.0029002312,0.5656127,0.00213486],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008312552,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006332899,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43401536,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00168877,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002675091,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999528},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401121506","doi":"10.56238/levv15n38-093","title":"Impactos e perspectivas das declarações de Salamanca e Montreal para inclusão como instrumento de conquista da cidadania e da autonomia na contemporaneidade","year":2024,"lang":"pt","type":"article","venue":"LUMEN ET VIRTUS","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.05790864320886395,"score_gpt":0.40496600760881446,"score_spread":0.3470573643999505,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401121506","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.873703,0.018988172,0.003656167,0.016256578,0.0019088514,0.0018476532,0.00072970503,0.0007623101,0.08214757],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99075884,0.0012653695,0.00016520124,0.00078043836,0.00069914426,0.00016191193,0.00005207095,0.0000728576,0.006044162],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99354875,0.0014848917,0.00092418777,0.0013054817,0.0011121274,0.0016245646],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99700505,0.0010658873,0.00029184748,0.0006013221,0.0002796582,0.0007562302],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022621779,0.0008803232,0.0010659319,0.00032087183,0.0017146755,0.0018863416,0.0010841249,0.00043441274,0.00059964164],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00052965083,0.0009060773,0.00044240916,0.0009185469,0.002414126,0.001217712,0.0007735927,0.0011376308,0.00036894638],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006223807,0.0009970957,0.057272777,0.00038515337,0.004069937,0.0013212747,0.35460496,0.0006703197,0.005299862,0.5243988,0.043026444,0.007330978],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008069076,0.0021033965,0.24665731,0.004016183,0.0018629978,0.00034549824,0.3451779,0.042423777,0.0018632262,0.019350026,0.32217902,0.005951603],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.034895554,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.039736968,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5050488,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004277561,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005899287,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99973637},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402006746","doi":"10.53054/bmj.vi2278-bis.10486","title":"El principio de solidaridad familiar a la luz de la jurisprudencia de la Corte Constitucional colombiana","year":2024,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Boletín del Ministerio de la Presidencia, Justicia y Relaciones con las Cortes","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Lockheed Martin (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.013307871985333886,"score_gpt":0.3604691473674253,"score_spread":0.3471612753820914,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402006746","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8045086,0.014337458,0.009002724,0.0019796817,0.0014172393,0.0014455297,0.00050452293,0.0008585254,0.16594566],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9776627,0.0127188405,0.0033776246,0.0007540251,0.0013048858,0.00047112186,0.000028607497,0.00014005919,0.0035421534],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98690814,0.005952655,0.0016235724,0.0016792954,0.0016943777,0.0021419546],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97947997,0.017608251,0.000627671,0.000686408,0.0006355337,0.00096215954],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0061205598,0.0012776789,0.0014769094,0.0005800266,0.002089183,0.0025668854,0.0015339876,0.0017284611,0.00035931714],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0051394114,0.0014067892,0.00073263724,0.0010889856,0.011410189,0.00082638627,0.00093701546,0.0021781535,0.00051472284],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00064471515,0.0008001501,0.09714,0.0012627057,0.0012261636,0.0064423415,0.027853843,0.0006633467,0.016096728,0.8166377,0.027233545,0.003998773],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0022452923,0.000455221,0.38575172,0.0060415883,0.0037018694,0.0024056702,0.014256143,0.013378481,0.0010986445,0.026528442,0.54113215,0.0030047547],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001824947,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013252865,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7901093,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020885577,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016725471,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999975},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403095861","doi":"10.37417/r1nbfn13","title":"Las relaciones entre el parlamento y las autoridades independientes: Sistema de nombramiento y control parlamentario","year":2024,"lang":"es","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.021757417839831882,"score_gpt":0.32083256300626295,"score_spread":0.2990751451664311,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403095861","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0044987113,0.008383166,0.0004966089,0.008977996,0.0046726894,0.0024163183,0.0004873306,0.00059949746,0.9694677],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6560561,0.003102724,0.00010352951,0.00048691305,0.0012420021,0.00018951081,0.00004377051,0.00007046922,0.33870494],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99251187,0.0002867161,0.0015022914,0.0018371884,0.0023936206,0.0014682998],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99604183,0.0013135254,0.00071088603,0.00066343416,0.00064474624,0.00062555604],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001253509,0.0014159626,0.0016652506,0.0005571576,0.0018125133,0.0012362711,0.0011267136,0.000774462,0.0044646244],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00027567326,0.0012820796,0.0010365165,0.0003112633,0.0031417098,0.0006546224,0.0006925537,0.0012416322,0.0062317],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014079965,0.00016907921,0.009366117,0.0002513358,0.0019030988,0.00020559703,0.010189574,0.000076290846,0.00005641751,0.97190773,0.005216896,0.0005170612],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012734497,0.00030817743,0.0014876532,0.0023770344,0.0012930869,0.000022021559,0.014285971,0.00014126673,0.00006029877,0.06812555,0.909034,0.0015914862],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0048393086,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0214681,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9038171,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004013128,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018569224,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99985904},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405214092","doi":"10.26522/ssj.v18i4.4367","title":"The Chilean Constitutional Process Narrated Through a Spiral","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Studies in Social Justice","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University College London","keywords":"Spiral (railway); Process (computing); Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Computer science; Engineering; Mechanical engineering","score_opus":0.1332613908672854,"score_gpt":0.49446460909011375,"score_spread":0.36120321822282836,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405214092","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.036581844,0.07838251,0.0006297514,0.03006189,0.016581932,0.0010996135,0.000060121034,0.0005458252,0.83605653],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9929667,0.0023162072,0.000049963845,0.00028582764,0.0029006694,0.00013545441,0.000002015855,0.000005872544,0.0013372531],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980294,0.0002701072,0.0002992634,0.0003185835,0.00061082805,0.00047178037],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981975,0.0012107083,0.00005465978,0.00006938901,0.00043510736,0.000032661803],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009404569,0.0001693497,0.0002353987,0.00004746303,0.0059278547,0.00014714123,0.00030914496,0.00006786662,0.000029946834],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018569321,0.00012710188,0.00008612845,0.0010775505,0.013493103,0.0003534513,0.00012949391,0.0003350985,0.00009133936],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001548663,0.000020729818,0.00032698808,0.00007173041,0.00013632167,0.00003350726,0.10838635,0.000023444349,0.0000027087694,0.85845834,0.031917416,0.0006069951],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020112799,0.000021178854,0.00076988875,0.00023193176,0.00014038463,0.0000035363926,0.41860574,0.000020868654,0.0000066089237,0.07462209,0.5051093,0.00026731935],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009022632,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020624145,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9563849,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00043842112,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009917269,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9953663},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413263378","doi":"10.35428/cds.vi20.346","title":"El derecho a la educación en el entramado de un Estado federal","year":2024,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Cartografías del Sur","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institute of Aging","funders":"","keywords":"Derecho; Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02033292315950917,"score_gpt":0.36407207090874943,"score_spread":0.34373914774924025,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413263378","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8539208,0.032481167,0.0021826946,0.01376462,0.00392835,0.000762847,0.00019036268,0.0005767278,0.092192404],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99130917,0.0046115555,0.00035409865,0.0003040392,0.0014802954,0.00010150629,0.0000142816725,0.00003858946,0.001786483],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99597186,0.0009238717,0.00046619715,0.0007908808,0.00081835606,0.0010288347],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99701726,0.0018734998,0.00008852187,0.00029372537,0.00034042215,0.00038659372],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012035164,0.0004837323,0.0005143412,0.00023186927,0.0011048984,0.0011475737,0.00057137274,0.00030889953,0.00032177236],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00076655135,0.00048208152,0.0004714177,0.0010790031,0.0016088212,0.0005007113,0.0002599813,0.00069724617,0.00054775464],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000061766856,0.00046345298,0.12712921,0.00029383675,0.0008864726,0.00058737496,0.05104022,0.000111896574,0.0007075739,0.7181002,0.033367746,0.06725024],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005580819,0.00012359394,0.074119166,0.0009885239,0.00034433464,0.00009587109,0.011590737,0.0007754209,0.0004558693,0.018259067,0.8916083,0.0010810365],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029344133,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012105632,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85824054,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00060471584,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025067234,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998893},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W607779337","doi":"","title":"Traducción del francés al castellano de la ley constitucional francesa de 10 de julio de 1940, del decreto constitucional francés de 4 de octubre de 1941, del decreto constitucional relativo a la sustitución y sucesión de la jefatura del estado francés de 17 de noviembre de 1942 y de la ordenanza de 3 de junio de 1943 instituyendo el comité francés de liberación nacional","year":2014,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Revista europea de historia de las ideas políticas y de las instituciones públicas/Revista europea de historia de las ideas políticas y de las instituciones públicas","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Decree; Philosophy; Art; Political science","score_opus":0.012537132952084876,"score_gpt":0.31497103945391636,"score_spread":0.3024339065018315,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W607779337","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5262786,0.046674076,0.34584433,0.008729051,0.004237602,0.0053057787,0.003746493,0.0036829507,0.05550107],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.83514106,0.011753478,0.12399417,0.013316395,0.009797019,0.0015556075,0.00046150602,0.0015675339,0.0024132435],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.93648905,0.028095543,0.0075318394,0.006690386,0.0048724767,0.016320717],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9522987,0.02056832,0.004834015,0.004947618,0.0036685083,0.013682823],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.03249916,0.007197406,0.0072430014,0.0041953768,0.010335101,0.0043937764,0.009624974,0.0068723164,0.0011540535],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04794013,0.0085901525,0.0038527201,0.0063536633,0.017977877,0.0030763976,0.0026108916,0.01387641,0.0008784495],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0059129023,0.0035995387,0.14261077,0.0026764595,0.0026377146,0.01811231,0.017724114,0.02955673,0.011297301,0.6878572,0.07660245,0.0014125198],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.013500059,0.0008099465,0.034583636,0.0059683416,0.0049867635,0.04718065,0.0013534309,0.020155944,0.00084855926,0.021582313,0.8410783,0.007952058],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012850442,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007789314,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7644758,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.057050917,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09613691,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998995},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W64984606","doi":"10.15581/009.40.29270","title":"Propiedad y derechos subjetivos","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Anuario Filosófico","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Hegelianism; Divergence (linguistics); Property (philosophy); Philosophy; Epistemology; Linguistics","score_opus":0.05083625474904832,"score_gpt":0.403124759786123,"score_spread":0.35228850503707465,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W64984606","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.31202218,0.0005260043,0.0010782705,0.008848542,0.0011386381,0.00058217614,0.000013883656,0.0002961177,0.6754942],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99302846,0.000055808046,0.00056026847,0.00045678017,0.0007834645,0.000035462934,0.0000027050507,0.000006075792,0.0050709657],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99860597,0.00012981264,0.00017077448,0.00028565858,0.00042217408,0.00038558914],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989774,0.00013539506,0.00006416312,0.00018768842,0.00052749313,0.00010785464],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00036008595,0.0001239616,0.00015880018,0.00007001902,0.0012951726,0.00009289034,0.0003124726,0.000071055285,0.0008900338],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005026456,0.000116500385,0.000054949556,0.00041488765,0.0020354334,0.00025659968,0.000084996245,0.00013298109,0.0021025408],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004758151,0.00015176098,0.088735744,0.000007020981,0.00007315216,0.000015182227,0.01964023,6.506392e-7,0.0004931782,0.8003549,0.076890245,0.013590371],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022098013,0.00012280302,0.074381,0.000033271088,0.000018693698,0.0000021492938,0.0015269034,0.000012972099,0.0011900562,0.010461779,0.91172856,0.00030082828],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0044612796,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015913254,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83483833,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013338456,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005099317,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99867445},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7030566485","doi":"","title":"National Bank Financial and Sun Life Financial Announce Closing of Project Borealis PV Solar Farms in Ontario, Canada","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Closing (real estate); Financial analysis; National bank; Financial instrument; Government (linguistics)","score_opus":0.031209394052786804,"score_gpt":0.29735658029502354,"score_spread":0.26614718624223677,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7030566485","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00386599,0.0009227378,0.0000790192,0.0005394845,0.0005385112,0.00075658184,0.00041411573,0.00003058599,0.992853],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.27055776,0.0008740099,0.002243624,0.0014643968,0.0022856696,0.00030592628,0.00027799013,0.0001361177,0.7218545],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99801433,0.000107257954,0.00032225298,0.0003454708,0.0008888083,0.000321872],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991789,0.0001433655,0.0002229456,0.00008576205,0.00029871112,0.0000703143],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00033574225,0.00022565243,0.00044235046,0.00021524813,0.00024623278,0.000039694958,0.0002281824,0.00019657216,0.0010522368],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00103023,0.00021466051,0.000046152818,0.0003039685,0.00078771345,0.00012502878,0.00009477308,0.00027017278,0.00000303685],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009913567,0.000029527364,0.01670065,0.00002192879,0.000019281737,0.0000052135647,0.0018340502,0.0000050986196,0.0000014287958,0.09024592,0.89091074,0.00021624168],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019915019,0.000017204404,0.057263903,0.00017389153,0.0000094598545,4.8699115e-7,0.0004004814,0.000007861172,0.0000022969134,0.00055858475,0.9411024,0.00026429904],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99944246,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999718,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.27099848,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008690959,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.036123917,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99986094},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7033694896","doi":"","title":"A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial to Evaluate the Therapeutic Effect of Magnesium-L-Threonate Supplementation for Persistent Pain After Breast Cancer Surgery","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Breast cancer; Therapeutic effect; McGill Pain Questionnaire; Placebo; Chronic pain; Neuropathic pain; Anxiety; Pain medicine","score_opus":0.3028585194299553,"score_gpt":0.585693161385269,"score_spread":0.28283464195531366,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7033694896","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96684057,0.007889091,0.00036133625,0.0059210123,0.0017087917,0.016371613,0.0001487149,0.00003677478,0.0007221302],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9846805,0.0029752513,0.0000101290525,0.00021059513,0.00040498647,0.011278942,0.000010558971,0.00002172661,0.00040732865],"study_design_codex":"randomized_trial","study_design_gemma":"randomized_trial","domain_scores_codex":[0.99230665,0.0042977,0.0011281574,0.00040142,0.0013722363,0.00049384095],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98513424,0.012861586,0.0007297098,0.00023437574,0.00088731066,0.00015279917],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.027974704,0.00031772748,0.0016532395,0.00069857424,0.00082077266,0.0006128437,0.0012262348,0.00006851997,0.0042223963],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014760994,0.00020277896,0.0010466253,0.0013465941,0.0006723465,0.0008345278,0.00031648992,0.00016339951,0.000012092621],"study_design_candidate":"randomized_trial","study_design_consensus":"randomized_trial","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.9632609,0.00008577605,0.019184409,0.00007891513,0.0010571135,0.000002858766,0.0023619463,0.00045476822,0.00055608014,0.00027257774,0.0069726813,0.0057119695],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.9749261,0.00006250506,0.016795317,0.00035321142,0.0015153359,0.0000012858945,0.0015205974,0.0003016637,0.00071586564,0.0016161625,0.0017413057,0.00045064103],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033870176,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019665477,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026498605,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022700403,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006948382,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9966879},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7119446081","doi":"","title":"The legal development of the notion of human dignity in the constitutional jurisprudence","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dignity; Jurisprudence; Human rights; Reputation; Philosophy of law; Constitutional court","score_opus":0.056499666021540176,"score_gpt":0.3696061576897807,"score_spread":0.31310649166824056,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7119446081","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8148606,0.00015159696,0.0028598586,0.01046974,0.00032492814,0.00050306146,0.000007561496,0.000012843194,0.1708098],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992596,0.000021990243,0.0000833502,0.000042171814,0.00003844087,0.000023786482,1.6750467e-7,7.2526893e-7,0.0005297969],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984829,0.0003010158,0.00029692624,0.00010634332,0.0006585119,0.00015434167],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986436,0.00082625385,0.0001355212,0.00014541496,0.00023400557,0.000015252801],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015132447,0.000065646964,0.00009571692,0.00002383977,0.0014181527,0.00002004941,0.0005839706,0.000025434441,0.00003959605],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00052484503,0.00002398611,0.000052492964,0.0002658053,0.0067209504,0.0001538349,0.000110793146,0.00007084454,0.000008559147],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000052672453,0.00003842716,0.026569588,0.0000016109883,0.000009217228,1.6527348e-7,0.0037123403,0.0000014968975,0.0014879187,0.96652526,0.00030010796,0.0013486253],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000336994,0.000022454826,0.86985016,0.00016356484,0.000011336109,0.0000011686295,0.010201613,0.0000012484712,0.009916411,0.016951004,0.092404895,0.00013913274],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00038277317,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018567367,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94957423,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000106333966,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00093119475,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99988186},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7120453026","doi":"","title":"Caso Airton Honorato y otros vs. Brasil : amicus curiae presentado ante la Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos","year":2023,"lang":"pt","type":"article","venue":"Lume (Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul)","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul; Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais; University of Toronto; Universidade Federal de Santa Maria; Universidade Federal de Uberlândia; Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior; Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico; University of Ottawa","keywords":"Human rights; Jurisprudence; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)","score_opus":0.03040926991168221,"score_gpt":0.3271751904561916,"score_spread":0.2967659205445094,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7120453026","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9543472,0.0013475604,0.00094507565,0.008504428,0.0017562594,0.0014879155,0.00041874466,0.00062065414,0.030572161],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9729612,0.0020387592,0.00006855415,0.00035950477,0.00046704127,0.000045427754,0.00007052636,0.00006174142,0.02392726],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9937441,0.0013017864,0.0006349663,0.0013571295,0.001228283,0.0017337626],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969237,0.0008717398,0.0005087761,0.0005737452,0.0004633293,0.00065872807],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00073047046,0.00082005776,0.001116593,0.00071374624,0.004284192,0.0014011873,0.0013750319,0.0004184894,0.0010318856],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00033581536,0.00093817443,0.0006453233,0.002774713,0.0030814959,0.0013279251,0.0008389086,0.0011071994,0.0014364788],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0022122832,0.00095249695,0.43117926,0.00043782606,0.0027040688,0.004033498,0.24539462,0.00058449444,0.00498274,0.041243356,0.25772506,0.008550289],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007238434,0.00086340704,0.4191691,0.0015547724,0.00068839075,0.000118644624,0.25918978,0.001871739,0.00046114498,0.0054159337,0.29999655,0.0034320755],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016008694,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02747552,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.042271484,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011165936,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011849583,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998813},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7133682114","doi":"10.20318/eunomia.2013.2146","title":"La interpretación constructiva en el constitucionalismo commonwealth: ¿activismo o vandalismo judicial?","year":2014,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"EUNOMÍA Revista en Cultura de la Legalidad","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"International Council for Canadian Studies","keywords":"Interpretation (philosophy); Constructive; Supreme court; Duty; Constitutionalism; Legislation; Focus (optics); Judicial interpretation","score_opus":0.010996729463039218,"score_gpt":0.35743762007417423,"score_spread":0.34644089061113503,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7133682114","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.29712465,0.007765924,0.012063928,0.012634492,0.0032522834,0.0023070886,0.0005580272,0.00056162925,0.66373193],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9926319,0.0014825338,0.0013156155,0.0011809972,0.002069948,0.00011575309,0.000043860942,0.000060638475,0.0010987142],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9804611,0.013473517,0.0015795237,0.0014699482,0.001577275,0.0014386438],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9871625,0.009570315,0.0010206577,0.0007944492,0.00071118405,0.00074089784],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.006730158,0.001184008,0.0018823049,0.00029911316,0.0024867374,0.0021556988,0.0016974973,0.0009253287,0.0007838533],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0051411716,0.0011088663,0.0007526303,0.0011640966,0.010569746,0.0014371077,0.00073040527,0.0023997426,0.00030235766],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018377486,0.00024103778,0.0099706035,0.00018844432,0.00055028487,0.000107660424,0.04226621,0.000049679235,0.00042193418,0.92717546,0.00973143,0.009113509],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013855111,0.00015287392,0.009834195,0.0014357574,0.00041731136,0.00034529733,0.012254026,0.00013740828,0.00015328843,0.0068363277,0.96566564,0.0013823899],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023920813,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00038150174,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95593417,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001589995,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00225609,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999018},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7140100909","doi":"10.20318/eunomia.2014.2196","title":"El dominio del Derecho. Recíproca rendición de cuentas e imperio de la Ley","year":2014,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"EUNOMÍA Revista en Cultura de la Legalidad","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Cambridge; University of Oxford; York University","keywords":"General partnership; Government (linguistics); Reciprocal; Rule of law; Core (optical fiber); Ideal (ethics); Ethos; Corporate governance; Public law","score_opus":0.011932477856917471,"score_gpt":0.36044138639304774,"score_spread":0.34850890853613026,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7140100909","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6254367,0.019416993,0.007999402,0.005417403,0.0009890083,0.001528668,0.0001425465,0.00041486524,0.3386544],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98196095,0.0056463364,0.0051765013,0.00097769,0.0020589193,0.0002549578,0.00002055783,0.000061024297,0.003843072],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9864741,0.008235889,0.0011843736,0.0012437922,0.0011047013,0.0017571652],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99370635,0.003603687,0.00070114824,0.0006811122,0.00053592405,0.00077179156],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.008262581,0.0009349324,0.0012195805,0.00018834136,0.0026211469,0.0027726751,0.0015598248,0.00074651674,0.00072982867],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0060230815,0.0008681883,0.00064451573,0.001097935,0.00453195,0.0009485771,0.0004683713,0.0016085355,0.00047204565],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00035090352,0.0004992697,0.05409669,0.00033177255,0.0006889983,0.00018937576,0.08893815,0.00017538854,0.008043101,0.7406064,0.09148325,0.014596647],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011842465,0.00016100978,0.033565767,0.0008333215,0.00036616632,0.00021285882,0.0109320935,0.00015258626,0.00072682276,0.0022413419,0.9484803,0.0011435009],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036383674,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00055444345,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.856997,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027322052,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026698168,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993769},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7140138948","doi":"10.20318/eunomia.2014.2207","title":"Autoridad","year":2014,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"EUNOMÍA Revista en Cultura de la Legalidad","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Chicago; Harvard University; University of Toronto; University of Oxford; Yale University","keywords":"Politics; Autonomy; Point (geometry); Work (physics); Action (physics); Power (physics)","score_opus":0.010773533016650952,"score_gpt":0.33868553265489615,"score_spread":0.3279119996382452,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7140138948","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12138223,0.010085773,0.004742803,0.00949906,0.00213517,0.0010793516,0.000068272966,0.00043435977,0.850573],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97641504,0.0010644394,0.0013984403,0.00055979245,0.003136809,0.00006250692,0.000009764603,0.000031433632,0.017321788],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99157,0.0044293874,0.000843391,0.00094451156,0.0011167455,0.0010959626],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99592096,0.0020292837,0.00044496113,0.00056269584,0.0005708174,0.0004712828],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0043438743,0.000656493,0.0008992851,0.00012279903,0.0020717198,0.0024826773,0.0011602009,0.00040885762,0.0010960622],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003656835,0.00059578806,0.00048322722,0.0010448067,0.0032100317,0.0008604233,0.0003457282,0.00095910765,0.0014920902],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033877088,0.00012959265,0.0047763707,0.000096330245,0.00017896428,0.0000296476,0.02620777,0.000050371993,0.00065170747,0.926785,0.034586657,0.0064737145],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00045874686,0.00009106118,0.01777725,0.0003751742,0.000164059,0.000025807563,0.004593279,0.00010268645,0.00009195903,0.0011786403,0.97437173,0.0007695774],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007992606,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000121812445,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9397851,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010232693,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009407226,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998171},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W8629607","doi":"10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a008664","title":"Mauritania: la \"rectificación\" de la democracia","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Afkar ideas: Revista trimestral para el diálogo entre el Magreb, España y Europa","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Geography","score_opus":0.017786938378702075,"score_gpt":0.3629824692375754,"score_spread":0.3451955308588733,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W8629607","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5285608,0.007335885,0.0018092708,0.0072129895,0.0007217927,0.0015323084,0.00009805092,0.00090638385,0.45182252],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9914058,0.001244139,0.0008857353,0.00041933716,0.00075384346,0.000021767717,0.000014932521,0.000036264715,0.0052182022],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99331313,0.002766834,0.00081880594,0.00093995547,0.0009373481,0.001223947],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966199,0.0016020366,0.0003544781,0.0005530049,0.00033932424,0.0005312476],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020497874,0.00061365106,0.00078680704,0.00023314077,0.0012638883,0.0006958419,0.0009549939,0.00026464707,0.0003095747],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023957402,0.00060858286,0.00042979763,0.0010248268,0.0019169251,0.0005607873,0.0001321325,0.0008119022,0.0008931152],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023743193,0.00074122165,0.030139843,0.000052475436,0.00017210678,0.0010782842,0.0036332821,0.00012097798,0.001767514,0.9179358,0.031866144,0.012254933],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012622013,0.00026445763,0.3082339,0.00031756095,0.0003103399,0.0001918168,0.001812021,0.00006440152,0.00026198718,0.046793412,0.6391709,0.0013170277],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00039305,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000902911,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8711424,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004198713,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001413009,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998848},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W87401982","doi":"","title":"El rol de Canadá frente a la Comisión Interamericana de Derechos Humanos en el contexto de la OEA","year":2012,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Cuestiones Jurídicas","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Art","score_opus":0.0399432141204982,"score_gpt":0.4579854370517774,"score_spread":0.41804222293127924,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W87401982","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8817555,0.007252861,0.011625107,0.0072943997,0.00090922666,0.0007331871,0.0001380898,0.00024360992,0.09004803],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9947909,0.0016314406,0.00085676165,0.00065043836,0.0011536231,0.00016582196,0.000009918797,0.000030168372,0.0007109257],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99477816,0.002609387,0.00047312913,0.0004221964,0.00056851277,0.0011486051],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995539,0.0029243191,0.00028765382,0.00029802043,0.00025591138,0.0006950654],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021351462,0.00041258198,0.00054446416,0.00019619995,0.0012870604,0.0002652694,0.00065152865,0.00031038275,0.00022599407],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0027332555,0.00043157145,0.00021991806,0.00047740564,0.0034568915,0.0004296246,0.00024612248,0.0007313566,0.00019771483],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000085758395,0.00051640696,0.60032344,0.00006275573,0.00034362145,0.00006125663,0.042717833,0.00003823471,0.0010683981,0.3375754,0.012184028,0.0050228606],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00085390726,0.00009767629,0.6446586,0.0006526206,0.00031250773,0.00012584424,0.0153824985,0.00031153078,0.0004509692,0.0062683397,0.3301529,0.0007325857],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.044361398,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0060117086,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.33130708,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019674336,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020724342,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998136},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W94566060","doi":"","title":"La Comunidad Europea, la Unión Europea y el Acuerdo con Canadá sobre tratamiento de datos API/PNR: ¿Crónica de la probable denuncia y sustitución anunciadas de un Tratado?","year":2007,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Revista General de Derecho Europeo / General Journal of European Law - ISSN 1696-9634","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.020635396796600574,"score_gpt":0.3387381831798606,"score_spread":0.31810278638326,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W94566060","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6554119,0.01009378,0.005011668,0.0009625588,0.0006168415,0.0007033881,0.00027614916,0.00016957094,0.32675415],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96519876,0.016201347,0.007860553,0.0027530924,0.004095111,0.00000783302,0.000048765265,0.00035205565,0.0034824985],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.96926075,0.02179514,0.0027661512,0.0013042251,0.0020235737,0.0028501751],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9915069,0.0014860918,0.0020283975,0.0011135336,0.0017238675,0.002141244],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.02222321,0.001434709,0.001642773,0.00052234525,0.0023432355,0.0026442853,0.0037277513,0.00042928432,0.00026996253],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022930985,0.0014195862,0.00092937174,0.0017859531,0.0036894842,0.0011507878,0.0010012871,0.003072136,0.00023029276],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0015587296,0.0017634585,0.017358476,0.0006655199,0.0018618002,0.037116103,0.012392087,0.0055158315,0.06731966,0.76679546,0.064484216,0.023168651],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002729806,0.00061877357,0.050171338,0.0013779055,0.00097165373,0.004150835,0.001369826,0.00029793291,0.0025912283,0.0004941439,0.93349206,0.0017345056],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022288123,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020654674,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8690078,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020567742,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005699946,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999368},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W987159862","doi":"10.18356/f1e4ed5d-en","title":"Human rights and the state in Latin America","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"Griffith Research Online (Griffith University, Queensland, Australia)","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Political science; Bureaucracy; Context (archaeology); Democracy; State (computer science); Authoritarianism; Latin Americans; Law; Irony; Successor cardinal; Political economy; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics; History; Philosophy","score_opus":0.14687598113539863,"score_gpt":0.44760576356991866,"score_spread":0.30072978243452003,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W987159862","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8039355,0.001087183,0.000049785525,0.014372609,0.0017292995,0.004134522,0.0027229693,0.00013339095,0.17183474],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.31575772,0.0021361243,0.0003173884,0.000061028404,0.001224154,0.000019767196,0.00036488197,0.000035991994,0.6800829],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99112636,0.003345497,0.0005689355,0.0011399225,0.0021974896,0.0016218],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99558574,0.0016768733,0.00036641167,0.00064747036,0.0012376241,0.00048589322],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.002609153,0.000599997,0.0011164,0.001240886,0.003980389,0.00033308662,0.00179535,0.000647466,0.0016656999],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003430745,0.0004760621,0.00022072374,0.0021179623,0.014181857,0.00038202855,0.0010670449,0.0052326308,0.0010773448],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012668154,0.0007800322,0.007609068,0.00021895024,0.00055992784,0.0007329992,0.025231725,0.00027901726,0.000058615795,0.06897892,0.8932838,0.0010001726],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0030463575,0.00013848688,0.025521506,0.00035735735,0.000057149457,0.000004277653,0.0048200004,0.000017528195,0.0000057459833,0.00407593,0.9612731,0.00068259577],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.24965116,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.59616774,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5082482,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006057027,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012136638,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997691},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}