{"meta":{"query_hash":"0eb1897fd3be","filters":{"topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies"},"cohort_total":207,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":207,"exported":207,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/0eb1897fd3be","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?topic=Comparative+constitutional+jurisprudence+studies"},"results":[{"id":"W10626397","doi":"","title":"Protesta social y libertad de expresión en Canadá: reflexiones y lecciones del G-20 en Toronto*","year":2012,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Derecho Comparado de la Información","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Limiting; Democracy; Context (archaeology); Political science; Persona; Cartography; Human rights; Geography; Law; Art; Politics; Engineering; Archaeology","score_opus":0.024951060247061157,"score_gpt":0.3909826082076545,"score_spread":0.36603154796059334,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W10626397","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5064175,0.061854765,0.0014222827,0.18296744,0.0014420513,0.000120246885,0.0005504062,0.00006312602,0.24516219],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9430819,0.010101574,0.0004644205,0.005369397,0.00012352015,0.00001922301,0.00005124611,0.000022802911,0.040765908],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99702054,0.0007359918,0.00008989984,0.00020641724,0.0008188187,0.0011284417],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9943018,0.0029398103,0.0003942381,0.00014630864,0.0011968047,0.0010210653],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032675099,0.00028407533,0.00034898816,0.002035464,0.013120519,0.005831172,0.0008959553,0.0023044893,0.0081026275],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0065616504,0.00029205644,0.00024862494,0.0030963626,0.012421381,0.0013196605,0.0024387653,0.0029204004,0.0002081451],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000581348,0.00011713381,0.026132667,0.0009321011,0.000080312566,0.0027378264,0.18207528,0.00079811807,0.0024148151,0.5409634,0.04886367,0.19430333],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000080932004,0.0001241383,0.10959053,0.0007157099,0.00008762653,0.00031615348,0.10414223,0.00057731546,0.0019461341,0.015560325,0.76673585,0.00012314663],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9916432,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9960907,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10971564,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10971564,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.17628826,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.79604644},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W111790151","doi":"","title":"Bjarne Melkevik, Tolérance et modernité juridique","year":2011,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Revista europea de historia de las ideas políticas y de las instituciones públicas/Revista europea de historia de las ideas políticas y de las instituciones públicas","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04542877346598837,"score_gpt":0.33056225603441725,"score_spread":0.28513348256842885,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W111790151","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.038746167,0.22731414,0.0036257473,0.13669279,0.0026446488,0.000020953406,0.00014748564,0.00006912169,0.59073895],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8681702,0.03913848,0.0012097055,0.0064982763,0.0012240129,0.000047688256,0.00006063249,0.00009602144,0.083554946],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99745387,0.0014810521,0.00009034234,0.00031686496,0.0003583719,0.00029947291],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988605,0.0006653162,0.00015888023,0.00009003672,0.000117998396,0.00010729356],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021708854,0.00044468377,0.00042701102,0.0014031243,0.005552723,0.008407736,0.00077678653,0.0031990847,0.007278758],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033798488,0.00027002723,0.00023639058,0.001478749,0.025550827,0.0068111727,0.002823084,0.0044868253,0.0011178672],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018729434,0.00000834147,0.00020576431,0.000050253475,0.0000037035104,0.000040558607,0.0073853103,0.000094207746,0.00004763356,0.97758806,0.009204887,0.005352509],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019062165,0.00002314501,0.00143957,0.00041011235,0.0000071035074,0.00016677189,0.012016186,0.00010416154,0.0001744777,0.40430096,0.58130765,0.000030739626],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01423595,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012454438,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01423595,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008999792,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038972045,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06529838},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1181913477","doi":"","title":"La irregularidad lógica y lo a priori constitutivo","year":2014,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Repositorio Universidad de Caldas","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy","score_opus":0.011496556435950739,"score_gpt":0.31600626782148916,"score_spread":0.3045097113855384,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1181913477","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.055813547,0.003285368,0.22115982,0.039402694,0.0008967933,0.000098487515,0.00024167859,0.00025887927,0.6788427],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9036211,0.0014142154,0.026890852,0.0038357915,0.0006191598,0.00017475149,0.00016415946,0.00022773774,0.06305232],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9939861,0.0023786873,0.00028455898,0.0012533438,0.0015499434,0.0005473222],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9937737,0.0027421191,0.000606533,0.001589275,0.0010242349,0.00026406476],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006039035,0.0005913574,0.00075243734,0.0011770608,0.0037332256,0.009069964,0.0016395913,0.0026122488,0.007289284],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009031978,0.0004626351,0.00089147576,0.0011297904,0.034190238,0.008454168,0.0055264626,0.0065272353,0.0010443635],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004567063,0.000001940591,0.00010860128,0.000014427307,0.000002135648,0.000015422484,0.00079095317,0.00007046671,0.00007049184,0.9975229,0.0004206235,0.0009774846],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009584042,0.000017704611,0.0004343552,0.00006522135,0.000012299068,0.00010542664,0.0010730794,0.0006843831,0.00043218405,0.91346693,0.08368247,0.00001634638],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004136089,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0043630013,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009069964,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005909803,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0044958526,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.042878807},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W128472689","doi":"","title":"El convenio de Montreal de 1999 y su ratificación en América Latina","year":2006,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Revista de responsabilidad civil y seguros: publicación mensual de doctrina, jurisprudencia y legislación","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.011894156471634854,"score_gpt":0.3223603464990078,"score_spread":0.31046619002737297,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W128472689","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.27807957,0.04427332,0.0033931995,0.11132116,0.0054243216,0.00048322912,0.0018780973,0.00034773344,0.5547994],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.67319983,0.008422399,0.002926069,0.015062613,0.0016171616,0.00033142813,0.00048654518,0.00019499606,0.2977589],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9934875,0.0014098927,0.00023551179,0.00076336606,0.0019340744,0.0021695837],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99554527,0.0015488286,0.0006329461,0.00037761973,0.0012232302,0.000672167],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008311851,0.0009454677,0.00064585236,0.0033501592,0.012049759,0.0075800642,0.0017982459,0.0058283587,0.0086165415],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011928951,0.00063648657,0.0008895823,0.003919114,0.0068987957,0.002109746,0.005230687,0.0075382213,0.0005958831],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00038478922,0.00018837301,0.01609514,0.0006159939,0.00010182499,0.0018620939,0.02820016,0.0008937765,0.004682,0.77669585,0.08292462,0.08735542],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007749867,0.00006743046,0.04310364,0.0003825504,0.000070728216,0.00012571854,0.0041132825,0.0001856864,0.0013728738,0.0046138754,0.94581753,0.000069209345],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.71601444,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7710948,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.71601444,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.039727908,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04740623,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.571316},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W143537392","doi":"10.47623/ivap-rvap.82.2008.2.07","title":"DERECHOS FUNDAMENTALES EN EL SISTEMA CONSTITUCIONAL CANADIENSE: ENTRE LA CARTA CONSTITUCIONAL Y LOS CÓDIGOS PROVINCIALES","year":2008,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Revista Vasca de Administración Pública / Herri-Arduralaritzarako Euskal Aldizkaria","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.027559763743527574,"score_gpt":0.34695963254340406,"score_spread":0.3193998687998765,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W143537392","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15921184,0.0031351377,0.009801936,0.028276892,0.00024139024,0.00013526632,0.00043995952,0.000115844494,0.79864174],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92686915,0.0013568847,0.0026225548,0.0014051682,0.000059267928,0.00006978661,0.00017883732,0.000049685776,0.06738871],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99547666,0.00090229884,0.00016126511,0.00050690176,0.0017997047,0.0011531365],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966222,0.00087237806,0.00040448064,0.0003115607,0.0012577084,0.0005316656],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025872777,0.00021299618,0.00032182445,0.0016973271,0.009131857,0.012470201,0.0012397434,0.0013527387,0.010046283],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0057467604,0.00026679438,0.000306225,0.004836099,0.010505521,0.004058526,0.005033696,0.0028436547,0.000785414],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017581408,0.00001238169,0.006550739,0.00007595758,0.000008671596,0.00014778093,0.021562705,0.0003122403,0.00027787042,0.95104957,0.005420413,0.014564183],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023141753,0.000039803803,0.06360501,0.00049456337,0.000045051773,0.00024489424,0.07797057,0.001211692,0.0006669676,0.14366007,0.71195954,0.00007865295],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.42762432,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.60740685,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.57237566,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0261873,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.034110054,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8502705},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W147117113","doi":"","title":"Aportes del derecho comparado a los sistemas alternativos de resolución de amparos del derecho de acceso a la información en Chile","year":2011,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Revista de Derechos Fundamentales","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Transparency (behavior); Freedom of information; Political science; Humanities; Derecho; Access to information; Cartography; Welfare economics; Geography; Law; Philosophy; Library science; Computer science; Economics","score_opus":0.05936737371831189,"score_gpt":0.37471299896168403,"score_spread":0.3153456252433721,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W147117113","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.67424923,0.005994271,0.08853256,0.023152664,0.00033624747,0.0011783749,0.0012502783,0.0040015182,0.20130485],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9649195,0.00092674315,0.014214398,0.00066918787,0.000059938746,0.0002752952,0.00035986493,0.00017236655,0.018402677],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98873913,0.0050482657,0.0007643607,0.0013330339,0.0033489831,0.0007662532],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97311246,0.011675087,0.0030736986,0.0037746578,0.007048167,0.0013159837],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02112896,0.0006422691,0.00053030933,0.0021628994,0.0021480764,0.010746015,0.0018158045,0.0019023925,0.0090837665],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026215734,0.00047165048,0.0006706786,0.0022120273,0.0036273042,0.00834961,0.005378542,0.0022336843,0.0017903458],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0023156512,0.0009777668,0.12924741,0.0038243532,0.0004218514,0.0011170943,0.05703274,0.018216422,0.023901235,0.119408704,0.026246924,0.6172898],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00084005465,0.0025655036,0.17998782,0.003175939,0.0007687396,0.0009133315,0.09782885,0.10451882,0.03751278,0.09502145,0.47609526,0.000771528],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04211214,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024842948,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04211214,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010667804,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011507075,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11174202},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1484821786","doi":"","title":"Bjarne Melkevik, Droit et agir communicationnel: Penser avec Habermas, Éditions Buenos Books International, París, 2012, 117 pp","year":2012,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Revista europea de historia de las ideas políticas y de las instituciones públicas/Revista europea de historia de las ideas políticas y de las instituciones públicas","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.030135965191148174,"score_gpt":0.3387568070745507,"score_spread":0.3086208418834025,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1484821786","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.001223095,0.66906154,0.0017909529,0.056309268,0.0059851203,0.000020267193,0.0004408421,0.00026750437,0.26490146],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.037473094,0.28266746,0.0017410149,0.008134584,0.0023283837,0.00009651922,0.0004395427,0.00054720463,0.6665721],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99874973,0.00038848477,0.000077075434,0.0001881007,0.000423422,0.00017329723],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990006,0.0004975156,0.00010079348,0.000072426345,0.00019038685,0.00013823608],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011784143,0.0015371896,0.0005816059,0.0021893647,0.0041871085,0.00899858,0.0013978658,0.0034139322,0.042176038],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0027579635,0.0007510236,0.0003738439,0.0035547633,0.0053981864,0.009584665,0.0024804368,0.004628571,0.019867186],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003706596,0.000022695425,0.0001952752,0.00041803892,0.000005685616,0.00011971706,0.00863422,0.00010060653,0.00013626453,0.09107281,0.826726,0.072531596],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000197641,0.0000032225119,0.0003483483,0.0004324926,0.0000020173582,0.000093997674,0.0024672258,0.000019232179,0.000054843786,0.005093574,0.9914766,0.0000064439455],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.049682852,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08819322,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.049682852,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0073198713,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007754712,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1410929},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1494723118","doi":"","title":"La justicia en la República: fortalezas y debilidades de la teoría","year":2007,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Revista philosophica","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; SOCRATES; Philosophy; Economic Justice; Political science; Soul; Law; Theology; Epistemology","score_opus":0.025070186430379154,"score_gpt":0.39907283654127534,"score_spread":0.3740026501108962,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1494723118","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.38035363,0.0050711776,0.0007942274,0.014228685,0.00011629288,0.000014905972,0.000059867074,0.00002835544,0.5993329],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9693942,0.0012017555,0.000089718946,0.00045871965,0.00002355578,0.000005885587,0.000018914394,0.000010357641,0.028796945],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990771,0.00030333406,0.000021937765,0.00007967736,0.00014948568,0.00036854457],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99959725,0.00014035408,0.00007324292,0.00004212402,0.00006530427,0.000081713835],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009805135,0.00011519912,0.00015982443,0.00056960294,0.0055118455,0.0049723987,0.00034235706,0.0006480897,0.008633083],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015367152,0.00009003417,0.00013759479,0.0013785115,0.007093395,0.0023657265,0.0032411397,0.0017161056,0.00035696977],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021375086,0.000017833547,0.004216871,0.00005250266,0.0000056876233,0.0003651243,0.07106952,0.00017498166,0.0002791882,0.90355915,0.004392941,0.015844787],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013797336,0.000043109543,0.031500574,0.0004025687,0.000016030837,0.0002977448,0.13610226,0.00028414745,0.0003945241,0.07978325,0.75113374,0.000028298635],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.043414794,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11517844,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.043414794,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0056884093,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004656374,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.086324215},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1504049924","doi":"","title":"CONTRIBUCIÓN EN TORNO AL PRINCIPIO PRESUNCIÓN DE INOCENCIA EN EL MARCO DEL NUEVO MODELO ACUSATORIO DE ENJUICIAMIENTO PENAL (Ley 906 de 2004)","year":2016,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Optech (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.018064299080289097,"score_gpt":0.36315269851228527,"score_spread":0.34508839943199615,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1504049924","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21271837,0.0060412465,0.018170208,0.03788774,0.00053425104,0.00021020869,0.00058100733,0.00016438936,0.72369254],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9390971,0.0020728991,0.004139355,0.0015777142,0.00008762566,0.00010049801,0.00014801667,0.00006835223,0.052708328],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961571,0.0016281042,0.000120638375,0.00054441823,0.00094083184,0.00060885516],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99581546,0.0008540349,0.0008365584,0.00040321003,0.0014805073,0.0006101981],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002684881,0.00053656375,0.00034453033,0.0014386703,0.004098417,0.010620872,0.0014843479,0.0015895624,0.009684309],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005895388,0.00024468568,0.00039701056,0.0011168635,0.0064214976,0.0034158682,0.004403513,0.0031775273,0.00061356777],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008898633,0.00009906251,0.031820606,0.00052696344,0.00006149213,0.0005210283,0.038176306,0.0040610614,0.0009996055,0.86049783,0.018591724,0.044555243],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000031838426,0.00018311843,0.10866389,0.0020580208,0.00013320905,0.00048755851,0.060517076,0.0055639474,0.001645262,0.09351928,0.7270105,0.00018633611],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12502596,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.22506239,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12502596,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015668502,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012964856,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24859643},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W150547283","doi":"","title":"Derecho internacional público: Nuevos desarrollos en la lucha contra el cambio climático (Montreal, de 28 de noviembre a 10 de diciembre de 2005)","year":2006,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Revista Española de Derecho Internacional","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Geography; Art","score_opus":0.01157654099512987,"score_gpt":0.3298662709470799,"score_spread":0.31828972995195,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W150547283","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.44635922,0.08124693,0.0017420963,0.15022637,0.0016581983,0.00008461091,0.0022927658,0.00014733835,0.31624252],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8999375,0.0111499885,0.00045580274,0.0025244749,0.00037286355,0.000048553393,0.0002620777,0.00005481024,0.085193835],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984309,0.00031067422,0.00003047697,0.00018013828,0.0003164137,0.00073142385],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997962,0.0005272194,0.0003652663,0.00011988671,0.0004892989,0.00053635804],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022945974,0.00026895426,0.00027370965,0.0015679663,0.008761023,0.0061703804,0.001271769,0.0019930124,0.008742024],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005677295,0.00033772708,0.00032164346,0.004605288,0.010221165,0.0019265587,0.0031973182,0.0029849212,0.00023049332],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021223475,0.000102996346,0.040713765,0.00036078942,0.000050245828,0.0011039197,0.09583525,0.0010886926,0.000960194,0.6805203,0.10854565,0.07050582],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002953064,0.000036053632,0.28721762,0.00031065935,0.000028431505,0.0001284976,0.025811268,0.00017831518,0.00046203737,0.004844884,0.6808894,0.00006331684],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9477813,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97620165,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06462178,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06462178,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06360038,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.468866},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1506244429","doi":"10.18046/prec.v5.1972","title":"Entre la Seguridad Democrática y la Legalidad Democrática. Políticas Constitucionales y la reelección presidencial en Colombia","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Precedente Revista Jurídica","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin für Sozialforschung; University of Cambridge","keywords":"Principle of legality; Democracy; Referendum; Political science; Politics; Law; Argument (complex analysis); Presidential system; Declaration of independence; Presidential election; Political economy; Public administration; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.012188362290775185,"score_gpt":0.33076137862428184,"score_spread":0.31857301633350665,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1506244429","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17973931,0.08398651,0.002723506,0.063232176,0.00071341166,0.00006950956,0.00021246508,0.00004981482,0.6692734],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98390734,0.0042820224,0.0003432888,0.00078160083,0.00014807089,0.00001763954,0.000020341167,0.000007842749,0.010491847],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972205,0.0011991109,0.00007896942,0.0003720742,0.00052105705,0.00060835015],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972031,0.0016003234,0.00047206186,0.00008440606,0.0003035897,0.00033652937],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024964155,0.00023251607,0.00032265054,0.0020381643,0.0065707583,0.012836172,0.00048753447,0.001792865,0.0075951978],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00471037,0.00023469143,0.00017857635,0.0018392492,0.009997747,0.0029274654,0.0020766736,0.002580509,0.00028557456],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003451777,0.000019566478,0.003600606,0.00021053123,0.000008034754,0.00025630093,0.013302388,0.0003098182,0.00021077071,0.955417,0.0042014252,0.022429043],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006445313,0.000056013185,0.057219714,0.0009778413,0.00007290379,0.00030992724,0.053795274,0.0010534677,0.0005265679,0.17159338,0.7142435,0.00008692336],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.17584991,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.29111803,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17584991,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.021352999,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013444747,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3496527},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1506863873","doi":"","title":"Dificultades y logros, de la aplicación de la convención de Ottawa sobre la prohibición del empleo, almacenamiento, producción y transferencia de minas antipersonales y sobre su destrucción, en Colombia. Análisis del caso comparativo Colombia – Angola, 1999 – 2004","year":2012,"lang":"es","type":"dissertation","venue":"reponame:Repositorio Institucional EdocUR","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Physics; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.014606790548730268,"score_gpt":0.332031706806381,"score_spread":0.31742491625765074,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1506863873","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.83289,0.007891472,0.0006767522,0.008539808,0.00010240323,0.00007571552,0.00035309012,0.00001884489,0.14945199],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9888538,0.0013219157,0.00021993686,0.000315676,0.000010509635,0.00001273953,0.000032076015,0.000005592548,0.009227794],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.996748,0.000983873,0.00016591286,0.00042771967,0.0006573565,0.0010172118],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9940977,0.0025135537,0.0010787951,0.0004621114,0.0011866973,0.0006611421],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026239392,0.00022116299,0.00022956272,0.0016694567,0.006669045,0.0070153587,0.0007287175,0.00097129936,0.0057133352],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008945324,0.00029515516,0.00018407112,0.0018967387,0.010029471,0.002149745,0.0030092732,0.0015915601,0.00019866553],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005707542,0.00012321913,0.21802324,0.0012760024,0.00014601505,0.0013719939,0.29209888,0.0012580253,0.0036259852,0.34738526,0.01116262,0.122958034],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024780324,0.00012387504,0.5538947,0.000735871,0.00014867158,0.00021613998,0.22978945,0.00026159026,0.002001865,0.00521461,0.20746596,0.00012257519],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.75452995,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.92835784,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.75452995,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.032443836,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02673998,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49383134},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1507571668","doi":"10.18543/ed-62(2)-2014pp207-234","title":"La protección del interés general por parte de la Administración y del Derecho administrativo. (Un estudio desde la teoría jurídica y la filosofía política)","year":2014,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Estudios de Deusto","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Intertek (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Political science; Derecho","score_opus":0.020936418701694562,"score_gpt":0.36405511198941,"score_spread":0.34311869328771544,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1507571668","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1234487,0.013954965,0.013226203,0.08639071,0.00091293437,0.00014464598,0.00039834954,0.00017085498,0.7613526],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8276894,0.006245022,0.0031280608,0.01045479,0.00045039222,0.00015120905,0.00017114257,0.00009988114,0.15161014],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9895746,0.00459076,0.00033604976,0.0013567867,0.0025412517,0.0016005633],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99292374,0.0021599184,0.0016561388,0.0007069528,0.0015281384,0.00102508],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007199474,0.0004033558,0.00027976598,0.0020079643,0.0074878167,0.016946865,0.0010073339,0.003269054,0.014614309],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008635038,0.00037186104,0.0006181799,0.0032335017,0.016478915,0.008227187,0.007931343,0.004336103,0.0019731103],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003176015,0.000042218373,0.010865168,0.00020059102,0.000031904412,0.00026695154,0.04050828,0.00024928508,0.0008048088,0.8986109,0.020167233,0.028220916],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017661521,0.00005395382,0.038367968,0.00060026755,0.000048119324,0.0002519825,0.04956441,0.00023159012,0.00093622686,0.09936791,0.81050086,0.000059022568],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04529806,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.059641454,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04529806,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012978043,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017096516,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09416276},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1511607720","doi":"","title":"José Calvo González, Octroi de sens. Exercices d’interprétation juridique-narratif, Les Presses de l´Université Laval","year":2011,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Revista europea de historia de las ideas políticas y de las instituciones públicas/Revista europea de historia de las ideas políticas y de las instituciones públicas","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02824098602298166,"score_gpt":0.2926529395725444,"score_spread":0.26441195354956276,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1511607720","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.027350415,0.14568733,0.0030718597,0.42648515,0.0070077246,0.00003803187,0.00036691668,0.00011311906,0.3898795],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6095545,0.08351066,0.0032762168,0.042606834,0.004728987,0.00012635284,0.00027528996,0.00031330093,0.2556078],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99855095,0.000748323,0.000032770313,0.00019591775,0.0003329188,0.00013907468],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99865425,0.00081287965,0.000118848526,0.00007888725,0.00023617939,0.00009893678],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015922951,0.00067169894,0.00035996715,0.0012834582,0.006205464,0.006188135,0.00090469676,0.0034422264,0.005108875],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004069181,0.00030219048,0.0002534539,0.0012909939,0.00839106,0.005718213,0.0022747936,0.004031815,0.0009458466],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008782444,0.000032691114,0.0015720051,0.00021114027,0.000016447753,0.00029496357,0.07348061,0.00010535023,0.00033462068,0.6332754,0.26606652,0.02452242],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017570812,0.000010268256,0.0036592856,0.00037037197,0.000009600539,0.00018137103,0.03123199,0.00007625537,0.00036469076,0.04426561,0.9197918,0.000021211266],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.042209443,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08135176,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.042209443,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0049709403,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0040695947,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08392751},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1513245694","doi":"10.24201/es.2010v28n83.219","title":"Las acciones de los pueblos autóctonos contra la violencia conyugal y el dispositivo nacional para la equidad de género","year":2010,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Estudios Sociológicos de El Colegio de México","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.019418166710185626,"score_gpt":0.3589977336827369,"score_spread":0.33957956697255126,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1513245694","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.31915933,0.08223262,0.028817177,0.098746285,0.0022979924,0.00012585605,0.0007241636,0.00011915971,0.46777734],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9360229,0.022082217,0.0054605426,0.002506106,0.0005760518,0.00008126623,0.00019962962,0.00003754014,0.03303373],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99740005,0.0011680585,0.000091432856,0.00039396874,0.00072796975,0.00021854258],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9956149,0.0021526555,0.0006416164,0.00068356306,0.00072932924,0.00017789031],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00542076,0.0003573665,0.00042551168,0.0023676439,0.0031827937,0.0052103023,0.00107501,0.0018870347,0.007899462],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008264478,0.00020614848,0.0004959525,0.002164359,0.011923564,0.004185168,0.0027509597,0.0021317322,0.00038443902],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000052512307,0.000029377285,0.017484926,0.00023779257,0.000036707464,0.00014098124,0.0066274814,0.00025174723,0.00037437896,0.92436796,0.0056392155,0.044756893],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000037677,0.00015668223,0.06966143,0.0032714845,0.00027243927,0.0010226284,0.023872627,0.001759986,0.0018422257,0.30124894,0.59678847,0.00006542878],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013608476,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.029163884,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013608476,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004205891,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0044116294,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030516088},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1516817049","doi":"10.5944/trc.30.2012.7013","title":"Las claúsulas notwithstanding y override del constitucionalismo canadiense","year":2012,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Teoría y Realidad Constitucional","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Tribunal; Philosophy; Political science; Cartography; Law; Geography","score_opus":0.04512527493505379,"score_gpt":0.3508835650899628,"score_spread":0.305758290154909,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1516817049","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018240793,0.006484706,0.010977424,0.03703113,0.00079384824,0.000033976194,0.00007459534,0.00006538867,0.9262981],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.80434453,0.0051270747,0.004227754,0.0108449785,0.0011501957,0.00015708579,0.00010726181,0.00015415357,0.17388698],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9944682,0.0019444232,0.00014708165,0.0011108004,0.0015345638,0.0007948612],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969476,0.0010613841,0.0002628526,0.0007386183,0.00063132134,0.000358278],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0041642305,0.0006580819,0.00048810808,0.0021199982,0.007240461,0.013192034,0.0014406658,0.003770875,0.011862278],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006261963,0.00036154126,0.00059953897,0.0023464866,0.031104175,0.008158224,0.0077107074,0.0071058827,0.0016135274],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000041630456,0.000002088081,0.00011603947,0.000012537689,0.0000021243786,0.000021055332,0.0018734619,0.00003565941,0.000033833527,0.9938351,0.001870394,0.0021934398],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001168129,0.000013345365,0.0009802999,0.00016030352,0.00001650213,0.000102903985,0.0033112082,0.00031334703,0.00022851444,0.6674619,0.32738024,0.00001977817],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020689763,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.029511478,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9895388,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010461191,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008409215,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07590163},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1519123424","doi":"10.14198/doxa2008.31.23","title":"Valores y problemas de la democracia constitucional cosmopolita","year":2008,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"DOXA Cuadernos de Filosofía del Derecho","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"WSP (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Humanities","score_opus":0.04282536453676809,"score_gpt":0.3551379383358712,"score_spread":0.3123125737991031,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1519123424","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04017325,0.008746199,0.02923358,0.08578153,0.0006232201,0.000037701473,0.00014635257,0.000091908754,0.8351662],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8915565,0.0051085986,0.0074928193,0.006225019,0.0007007215,0.0001334062,0.00008965331,0.00015634831,0.088536896],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967092,0.0016457498,0.00007108663,0.00050908345,0.0005829573,0.0004819437],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99781954,0.0010509329,0.00023874249,0.0004069796,0.00027758602,0.00020620358],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032484375,0.00050128176,0.000493276,0.0012926358,0.0045874445,0.008251708,0.001021768,0.002838598,0.009006897],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0038281314,0.00030179374,0.000677424,0.00130477,0.028496455,0.007591077,0.0053063403,0.007442255,0.0009939267],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000022073755,0.0000015366833,0.00004470456,0.000006498581,9.4090586e-7,0.000006293873,0.00038277204,0.000041466028,0.000013382149,0.998326,0.00061412464,0.0005600685],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000110860165,0.0000067790866,0.0003409303,0.0000620633,0.000005099711,0.000044119486,0.0009284169,0.00029850108,0.0001378113,0.9216073,0.07654992,0.000007935742],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0076809283,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010777789,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009006897,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0073493114,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0041277204,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05332327},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1526401859","doi":"","title":"Derechos humanos y justicia para mujeres indígenas: experiencias desde la sociedad civil","year":2010,"lang":"es","type":"book-chapter","venue":"ITESO Institutional Repository (ReI) (Western Institute of Technology and Higher Education)","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.036940510324175856,"score_gpt":0.34469405299179534,"score_spread":0.3077535426676195,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1526401859","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09834614,0.016049,0.0013400045,0.020206891,0.00045429598,0.000017667162,0.000044572454,0.000031097632,0.8635103],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.80047405,0.007000983,0.00043536784,0.001293787,0.00016772326,0.000027499029,0.000032582055,0.000027697955,0.19054024],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995363,0.00023835973,0.0000066726197,0.000044204993,0.00009033337,0.00008416448],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996414,0.0002099261,0.000037785096,0.00002824707,0.00003623334,0.00004637702],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008177953,0.00026440946,0.00016908928,0.00058140693,0.0057406337,0.004316999,0.000448209,0.0013758189,0.0034211706],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010774687,0.00013724389,0.00010133526,0.0010706976,0.016319517,0.0026495531,0.0022052147,0.0021118603,0.00021088285],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008933747,0.000008273672,0.0004274535,0.000031937805,0.0000015965749,0.0001638757,0.11473895,0.000046241734,0.0001278108,0.861057,0.016238373,0.007149579],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000073244237,0.000017350847,0.0040926686,0.00024138167,0.000007633837,0.0002535508,0.121698186,0.00011916133,0.00024048601,0.06470309,0.80860925,0.000009887591],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03654706,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11007904,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03654706,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0065080826,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0047530048,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07266867},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1528465847","doi":"","title":"El concepto de jurisdicción","year":2013,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Aequitas Revue de développement humain handicap et changement social","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy","score_opus":0.061079602041086686,"score_gpt":0.4138905456009712,"score_spread":0.3528109435598845,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1528465847","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03386868,0.006867608,0.05161709,0.031224228,0.00090953347,0.000059978367,0.00014128113,0.00012596302,0.87518567],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94223905,0.0019400764,0.006234439,0.0030531466,0.0009570418,0.0001868587,0.000065473825,0.000081365775,0.045242608],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9890591,0.0055722236,0.0002783987,0.001793424,0.0021960281,0.001100835],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99311334,0.003726189,0.00044389805,0.0012828578,0.0010914109,0.0003421912],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0089275995,0.00056698325,0.0009366937,0.0039803395,0.006450165,0.014395672,0.002800104,0.0054006367,0.007218411],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010168142,0.0006123722,0.00072182965,0.003492822,0.05664929,0.015927043,0.006377618,0.0073325317,0.0007954115],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[6.7929994e-7,7.9385734e-7,0.00001529178,0.0000025074908,4.6126212e-7,0.0000026661087,0.00029206707,0.000010130575,0.0000082311135,0.99903905,0.00016495324,0.00046319843],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013505098,0.0000086620685,0.00023031792,0.000048443937,0.000009230956,0.0000758326,0.0011119251,0.00020651905,0.000095387,0.93478656,0.063404016,0.0000095749965],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009389765,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00666619,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014395672,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00936047,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0065879086,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06791532},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1528750239","doi":"","title":"El Derecho Romano en la formación del jurista. Criterio defendido por un profesor hispalense en 1880","year":2013,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Aequitas Revue de développement humain handicap et changement social","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0413088802903272,"score_gpt":0.3894568311373717,"score_spread":0.3481479508470445,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1528750239","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.053965386,0.048555247,0.0141384,0.060598418,0.0032104822,0.00009130613,0.00017558191,0.000056255558,0.8192088],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9060928,0.006489419,0.0047239023,0.0077242404,0.0014652059,0.00014054785,0.000057927686,0.00007772582,0.07322826],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99374276,0.0035806699,0.00020602315,0.0007181896,0.0011965279,0.00055586477],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978967,0.0011925275,0.00020301637,0.00025197747,0.00035970638,0.00009596933],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005492537,0.00041823235,0.0004382279,0.0013452568,0.0057276688,0.00605067,0.0007383466,0.0035245167,0.00211903],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007882413,0.0004207805,0.00037671597,0.0012734993,0.029547364,0.003712676,0.0036271114,0.008515231,0.00045152107],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000061622723,0.0000032613545,0.00010387992,0.000010909901,9.146638e-7,0.000013844435,0.0022231697,0.00002962738,0.00003060513,0.9940759,0.0016578321,0.0018437807],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003657563,0.000053715197,0.0019400357,0.000335744,0.000014059363,0.0001875846,0.0029439959,0.0003353261,0.000684492,0.5069509,0.48649114,0.000026357133],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007530861,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010545069,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007530861,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0066331527,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005057476,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.048127055},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1534181476","doi":"","title":"Bjarne Melkevik, Philosophie du jugement juridique, Collection Dike, Presses de l'Univ. Laval, Quebec, 2010, 205 pp","year":2012,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Revista europea de historia de las ideas políticas y de las instituciones públicas/Revista europea de historia de las ideas políticas y de las instituciones públicas","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0254900419643649,"score_gpt":0.3037584107317062,"score_spread":0.2782683687673413,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1534181476","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0016210293,0.7756241,0.00058626424,0.05586325,0.0036344202,0.000025576803,0.0010412157,0.000131033,0.16147313],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.055886842,0.29226354,0.0008218191,0.007723903,0.0014261891,0.000089923094,0.0007413451,0.00028106882,0.6407654],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990023,0.00018090142,0.00004703648,0.0001390313,0.00040147905,0.000229352],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992481,0.00019164172,0.00005381261,0.00004799517,0.00031619408,0.00014220242],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010512513,0.0016018463,0.00073589117,0.0025471747,0.009243369,0.008056048,0.0016348967,0.0026578773,0.04650131],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022106827,0.0007574406,0.00034958488,0.0060470346,0.0056465897,0.005071455,0.0017657115,0.003319631,0.011446416],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024103507,0.0000141665305,0.00050601934,0.00027893667,0.000008303156,0.0000908554,0.0041030077,0.00013696337,0.00010845021,0.04978475,0.90554214,0.0394023],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000035564087,0.0000019202628,0.0024820704,0.00049117755,0.0000030937447,0.000053056,0.0021348866,0.00003442612,0.000049467257,0.0028062796,0.99192786,0.000012175793],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8912195,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96386063,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8912195,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06472036,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.041862547,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4695813},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1546103916","doi":"10.17058/rdunisc.v0i0.1800","title":"Las condiciones de la ciudadanía","year":2010,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Revista do Direito","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Monsanto (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Physics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.013593839561939115,"score_gpt":0.3842134505029887,"score_spread":0.3706196109410496,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1546103916","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.067072496,0.0049953926,0.021678274,0.016983662,0.0004383844,0.00008889297,0.0001019757,0.00007117877,0.8885697],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.965989,0.0019308411,0.0042835907,0.001238368,0.00014804662,0.00012904557,0.00005575667,0.0000631067,0.026162159],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9880427,0.005474861,0.0004739177,0.0016592812,0.0028247728,0.0015243463],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9921847,0.0033212425,0.00092074,0.0012087794,0.0016839483,0.00068056484],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008319279,0.0004952467,0.0005752978,0.0028208431,0.010405741,0.017512731,0.0013197968,0.0036906449,0.006378056],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013115826,0.0005386406,0.0005609283,0.002777962,0.071718715,0.007058817,0.008058636,0.007039645,0.0006797571],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000041924154,0.0000042876627,0.00041168943,0.000019726898,0.0000024689036,0.000031577536,0.008062495,0.00003201848,0.00011019634,0.9891145,0.00039628427,0.0018105553],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020858939,0.000037069578,0.0060501704,0.00042077163,0.000028781737,0.00032709437,0.03312758,0.0002389785,0.0008397227,0.7195007,0.23935471,0.000053521748],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010114692,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014640708,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017512731,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010027771,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009414311,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07275689},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1555570896","doi":"","title":"La autonomía universitaria. Discurso ideológico instituido o razón doctrinaria del ser de la universidad","year":2008,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Actualidad Contable FACES","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Political science; Humanities","score_opus":0.0218618622989327,"score_gpt":0.32775664420707773,"score_spread":0.305894781908145,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1555570896","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005432561,0.053971156,0.0016364154,0.09543532,0.005763779,0.000022008817,0.00036975055,0.0002246992,0.8371443],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.21715222,0.021960335,0.002639263,0.008348243,0.0021753449,0.00014755061,0.00041152546,0.00028618716,0.7468794],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990038,0.00034139556,0.000038995342,0.00019973642,0.0002610752,0.00015510146],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991202,0.00022711809,0.00010975447,0.00008393814,0.00023028188,0.00022878591],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011602538,0.0005906549,0.00033969214,0.0008687186,0.0063785575,0.007166391,0.00061154575,0.0028111276,0.041174985],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019368108,0.0003580241,0.00029573205,0.0010755797,0.0041143876,0.0050187297,0.0029368738,0.0054186163,0.010708574],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000055593355,0.00005736431,0.00076602906,0.00016995915,0.0000067054957,0.00007694912,0.00537169,0.000098709505,0.00032429557,0.4716501,0.45895806,0.062464572],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007761222,0.000011033878,0.0014878295,0.00017741346,0.0000028863221,0.000042214164,0.0018707108,0.000042855107,0.00011025079,0.0114113,0.984829,0.0000068146446],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01650415,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.030578181,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.041174985,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006038142,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0059962813,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13774401},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1558430372","doi":"","title":"Reflections on the legal Evolution of Free Expression in Canada and Colombia in the Context of Democratic Consolidation","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dialnet (Universidad de la Rioja)","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.035844429650243176,"score_gpt":0.30872560544091304,"score_spread":0.27288117579066984,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1558430372","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25216666,0.012942951,0.0019485358,0.037404858,0.0002962024,0.000111359615,0.00022710992,0.000054169595,0.6948481],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98204064,0.0014528566,0.00034573098,0.0013190422,0.000026088668,0.000028658209,0.000037277357,0.000022554534,0.014727068],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99194396,0.0015941759,0.00015594366,0.00056486734,0.0015302018,0.0042107403],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960573,0.0014947106,0.00029911406,0.00020154784,0.0010532531,0.00089421176],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031295933,0.00043579066,0.000640256,0.0032124857,0.037469212,0.017786495,0.0018231553,0.003238034,0.0061333496],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009612897,0.000390105,0.00043106737,0.0035431364,0.032598708,0.003974491,0.007293322,0.0060812244,0.00018509652],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000040994677,0.00002481554,0.002420702,0.000079509526,0.000009856529,0.0005383946,0.07817234,0.00042807238,0.00038488707,0.9011236,0.0040828567,0.012693972],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000069906266,0.00004561281,0.03321103,0.0005702975,0.00007292245,0.0007162055,0.34103414,0.0011287865,0.0012521438,0.060947165,0.5606066,0.0003451472],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97920036,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98886675,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1848357,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1848357,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09309407,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.94547504},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1563267976","doi":"10.5347/isonomia.v0i13.556","title":"El derecho como técnica social de control y reforma","year":2021,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Isonomía - Revista de teoría y filosofía del derecho","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Derecho; Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03394486707102085,"score_gpt":0.3627048328390092,"score_spread":0.3287599657679883,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1563267976","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05443977,0.008947777,0.033255585,0.062963866,0.0006379806,0.00012329839,0.00011270524,0.00016069566,0.8393584],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9477761,0.0026543492,0.0036391348,0.0021321937,0.0003439359,0.00014655996,0.000044301632,0.000060453796,0.043203063],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9866807,0.007366489,0.0003313814,0.0019647756,0.0023206684,0.0013360453],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.994951,0.0018996387,0.00071335264,0.001322352,0.00079875556,0.00031494876],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009129514,0.00047331123,0.00048679128,0.0016624223,0.00505936,0.010763177,0.00092931406,0.0025794082,0.006279217],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010531103,0.0003177668,0.00041885057,0.0018328748,0.03834813,0.0059847166,0.004065766,0.0035016227,0.00055221515],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000030119108,0.0000043132763,0.0002439692,0.000014723471,0.0000022639051,0.000009628256,0.0011407948,0.00008606307,0.00006806818,0.99445987,0.00080900016,0.0031583705],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000036861395,0.00006059441,0.0028126878,0.00029209026,0.000022521317,0.00008343159,0.0046632844,0.0010822347,0.00075790886,0.6612003,0.32896185,0.00002631884],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012611665,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013203257,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012611665,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010611816,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011591821,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07699448},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1563908492","doi":"","title":"Enfoques sociológicos para el estudio de las Cortes Internacionales","year":2015,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen)","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Centre for International Governance Innovation","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.16291537395750483,"score_gpt":0.4049239019087118,"score_spread":0.24200852795120698,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1563908492","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.104554765,0.11810008,0.022464264,0.08718691,0.0018223022,0.00010966291,0.000415711,0.00011182432,0.66523445],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9241298,0.043270726,0.0049652397,0.003141164,0.0017799488,0.0002197127,0.00016665724,0.00009524022,0.022231486],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99569017,0.0031057934,0.00010409803,0.00023664227,0.00054542685,0.0003178705],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9906916,0.0075438307,0.0004975067,0.00030992652,0.00069110014,0.00026594728],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005312916,0.00051028444,0.00041948853,0.0055285306,0.006731222,0.010233686,0.0011174983,0.0019333833,0.0056057847],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011386964,0.0003411999,0.00034394715,0.0070007057,0.018905176,0.007720776,0.0034641807,0.0038286753,0.0005231495],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010082764,0.00001819136,0.0012837857,0.00011878027,0.000006157201,0.00014494754,0.03843639,0.0002171478,0.000055885135,0.9453414,0.0053925705,0.008974702],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001280579,0.000024036382,0.0058467267,0.0010189124,0.000023688028,0.00029052465,0.12515292,0.00075910456,0.00015634873,0.35232097,0.51436555,0.000028495686],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023411619,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.039022937,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023411619,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008785493,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005318422,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06374347},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1566921996","doi":"","title":"El derecho del espacio exterior y el futuro de la humanidad","year":2010,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas)","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"McGill University","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Derecho","score_opus":0.022503651757075246,"score_gpt":0.3119870365520831,"score_spread":0.28948338479500785,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1566921996","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12294934,0.011252571,0.024522936,0.04838085,0.0006228175,0.000041556126,0.000076572396,0.00011137033,0.7920421],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96467596,0.0025854032,0.0022423374,0.0016463376,0.00023063221,0.000028899372,0.000034875455,0.00007379164,0.028481722],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9919825,0.0046951957,0.00020498736,0.0008980974,0.0014746843,0.0007445326],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99496585,0.0024007058,0.00042586937,0.0011048892,0.0006729383,0.0004296176],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007293022,0.00033861125,0.00045857925,0.0017361061,0.0064196056,0.016574824,0.0012485832,0.003532521,0.00671831],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007176498,0.00026744202,0.00043364946,0.0021088216,0.069784865,0.0075458665,0.0090125855,0.005050465,0.000574405],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000034066961,0.0000030329736,0.00026332695,0.000020099807,0.0000016535471,0.000035127672,0.010861311,0.00005267719,0.00011819172,0.9851576,0.0006003522,0.0028831735],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009806761,0.000034108034,0.0031298054,0.0004728836,0.000013013746,0.00019377939,0.056729663,0.0002737173,0.00087451027,0.6199259,0.31831938,0.000023435605],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007011912,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010072171,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016574824,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0066893017,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008752038,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.048534453},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1569107309","doi":"10.35487/rius.v2i22.2008.144","title":"Los derechos de las minorías en la filosofía política y en el derecho internacional","year":2016,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"REVISTA IUS","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Derecho; Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.021965029332681987,"score_gpt":0.3917464396357335,"score_spread":0.36978141030305156,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1569107309","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.35592377,0.004502214,0.022678146,0.03719951,0.00050310657,0.000074956246,0.00016672362,0.00015843802,0.5787931],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97367,0.0010607346,0.001132795,0.0009114398,0.00009166097,0.00004253835,0.000036128622,0.000031510623,0.023023127],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99029446,0.0049436013,0.00027531665,0.0008856802,0.0017095428,0.0018914992],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99310476,0.0026305898,0.0011019193,0.0005636481,0.0014812626,0.0011177978],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005394268,0.00044814724,0.00037583194,0.0017205103,0.007957529,0.011619941,0.0009856231,0.0023232873,0.0072659203],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008770175,0.00026697604,0.00044362195,0.0019401661,0.018356934,0.007674952,0.0074483408,0.0032496373,0.000825206],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003782782,0.000022795643,0.0069458205,0.00009556526,0.000009042506,0.00023919938,0.056490194,0.0002535162,0.0006485717,0.9167549,0.003074886,0.015427622],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028248169,0.00009364296,0.033672657,0.00076256064,0.000040183986,0.0006398389,0.20334132,0.0011352232,0.0017045699,0.2735549,0.48489457,0.00013238384],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021358466,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.028846927,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021358466,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009932666,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010159775,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0720669},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1570961987","doi":"10.18543/ed-51(1)-2003pp93-110","title":"Penetración de la historicidad en el Derecho Constitucional español","year":2015,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Estudios de Deusto","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Optech (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Derecho; Political science; Humanities; Democracy; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.03409644192211092,"score_gpt":0.39714367939955497,"score_spread":0.36304723747744405,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1570961987","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15455762,0.00866327,0.0047830064,0.028912043,0.0003533011,0.000017408764,0.00012310504,0.00003619233,0.8025541],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9414158,0.0024174775,0.0004909226,0.0013713214,0.0001958719,0.000021476988,0.00006669273,0.00003213193,0.05398828],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99858725,0.00070598803,0.00003699864,0.00016977193,0.0002906427,0.00020934346],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989084,0.00062639365,0.0000874298,0.00012754585,0.0002004841,0.000049729984],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024522112,0.00017043426,0.00014887567,0.0011936863,0.0039228494,0.006198953,0.00057731615,0.0016091696,0.008217368],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003011722,0.00015760644,0.00016236272,0.001664013,0.01175814,0.0038090725,0.0031305382,0.0024870418,0.00042180222],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000054723037,0.0000031882246,0.00034804156,0.000016467835,0.0000013117532,0.000047161546,0.009357288,0.000043581043,0.00009394627,0.98376966,0.0017765895,0.004537344],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013000516,0.00002693816,0.006415305,0.00044865857,0.000011581373,0.0001886114,0.036360536,0.00024515722,0.0009190065,0.21481119,0.74053997,0.000019976382],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015850887,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02730665,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015850887,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0061090393,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00341487,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.044324398},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1594003324","doi":"","title":"El triomf de la doctrina Sinatra. El dret a decidir al Quebec, Escòcia i Catalunya","year":2014,"lang":"ca","type":"article","venue":"Eines per a l'esquerra nacional","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.015098369129046597,"score_gpt":0.353425073259357,"score_spread":0.3383267041303104,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1594003324","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08051496,0.036306143,0.0034045782,0.2542836,0.0021364156,0.00004921984,0.00048892666,0.000072803705,0.6227434],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.81814975,0.004017689,0.0011902706,0.019879656,0.00028327273,0.00004737607,0.000089716836,0.000055385117,0.1562869],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976889,0.00086573506,0.0000508746,0.00033344704,0.00055709534,0.0005039809],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983576,0.00061435613,0.00008361452,0.00016953569,0.0005872352,0.00018758053],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032462243,0.000416106,0.00038401177,0.0009552981,0.01217251,0.008223118,0.0011630744,0.0052959356,0.008096901],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0047017517,0.00032262006,0.00025466457,0.0012539583,0.01918274,0.0025150713,0.0020559838,0.0073851445,0.00039629437],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016677983,0.000010960724,0.0007439752,0.00003095539,0.0000033913507,0.00005607463,0.0056877565,0.00007070572,0.00011622191,0.96360195,0.023321612,0.0063397675],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006115909,0.00003186209,0.012579375,0.00059459615,0.000029907409,0.00013785015,0.023478538,0.00055036723,0.0005833918,0.14147617,0.82041997,0.000056807847],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.83066297,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.90497327,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16933703,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03540543,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.042448472,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34066856},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1595850880","doi":"10.14198/doxa2007.30.06","title":"La regla hartiana de reconocimiento en el pensamiento garzoniano","year":2007,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"DOXA Cuadernos de Filosofía del Derecho","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Optech (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Humanities","score_opus":0.036818597342257744,"score_gpt":0.38286650482407103,"score_spread":0.3460479074818133,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1595850880","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16521971,0.005658143,0.027780036,0.015160559,0.00035514063,0.00006821034,0.000045826764,0.0000841659,0.7856282],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93593556,0.0015705263,0.0029648256,0.0007827013,0.00009855401,0.000033000946,0.000014199432,0.000035841116,0.058564764],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965894,0.0017862469,0.00008494852,0.00041993198,0.0006406277,0.0004789371],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966492,0.0016466303,0.00041431334,0.00064879324,0.00040552867,0.00023558183],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0041699237,0.00025401276,0.0003149216,0.0011992245,0.0052359,0.0063236644,0.00093222957,0.0015908342,0.0085733095],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006041033,0.00023474851,0.0002695223,0.0013797265,0.023054695,0.0047496157,0.0039660265,0.002444354,0.0006833653],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000050856916,0.0000061277324,0.0002979534,0.000021266424,0.0000011813366,0.000037289225,0.010180962,0.00009299473,0.00016345942,0.98218185,0.0005843969,0.0064275227],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001870828,0.00007613475,0.0051867235,0.00029722904,0.000018324063,0.00022555981,0.029048953,0.0005868996,0.0015192967,0.5361028,0.4268858,0.000033522832],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0078067495,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021169001,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0085733095,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005575453,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00529467,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.040452898},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1595981154","doi":"","title":"El discurso del odio en la jurisprudencia constitucional: análisis comparativo","year":2014,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Revistas PUCP (Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú)","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Art","score_opus":0.0176787994020915,"score_gpt":0.32999144044725903,"score_spread":0.31231264104516754,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1595981154","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5074933,0.06422989,0.010806052,0.011538186,0.00033970515,0.00014472545,0.00072923664,0.00005920637,0.4046597],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9774825,0.012997035,0.0023103755,0.00044922438,0.00030160276,0.000109896886,0.0002601729,0.00005920537,0.0060300305],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9928427,0.00403826,0.00031950255,0.0005942472,0.0016817915,0.00052338437],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9663163,0.028529335,0.0021316917,0.0010121475,0.001642868,0.00036774046],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0067664334,0.0004806698,0.00082311506,0.010554188,0.003854177,0.010938039,0.00094040966,0.0010908658,0.012807665],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019268917,0.0003046133,0.00050821656,0.018619021,0.015695669,0.006948015,0.006717582,0.0018960265,0.0006130978],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001678156,0.000063048654,0.040916726,0.0015991642,0.00010337488,0.00037501098,0.18660513,0.00035679882,0.000598585,0.69164234,0.004466046,0.073105894],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000031961208,0.00026746045,0.19927841,0.0037075581,0.00021879985,0.0008798219,0.36521536,0.0011804544,0.0010104572,0.16378023,0.2643654,0.0000642041],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007718998,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008560803,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012807665,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005913347,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032707525,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.042904556},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1606926249","doi":"","title":"Pluralidad de los Ordenamientos Jurídicos y Sistemas de las Fuentes del Derecho","year":2013,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Aequitas Revue de développement humain handicap et changement social","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Derecho; Political science; Philosophy; Humanities","score_opus":0.06285009741983263,"score_gpt":0.40400869454624483,"score_spread":0.34115859712641217,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1606926249","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19809273,0.0045988876,0.054906424,0.027143732,0.00086884067,0.00017470146,0.00020314973,0.00010218789,0.7139093],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94964194,0.0007625221,0.005646475,0.0006689652,0.0002354689,0.00011329578,0.00005686079,0.0000423685,0.042832132],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9849309,0.0069850176,0.0007546934,0.0020623822,0.0037605753,0.0015063289],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9903341,0.004346353,0.00089736766,0.0020248662,0.0018681437,0.00052926445],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022314671,0.00036718292,0.0006752248,0.00277166,0.011390207,0.015637783,0.001826015,0.0041531483,0.006884068],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023382353,0.0006121317,0.00041855106,0.002456519,0.028032908,0.0102542,0.0063667884,0.0062166476,0.0005392223],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007389565,0.000005800833,0.0002686001,0.000011276598,0.0000024007845,0.0000205011,0.004994378,0.000066481356,0.00011454393,0.9910618,0.00042370366,0.0030230747],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000040463892,0.00003405283,0.004386303,0.00018190693,0.00003104111,0.00015073137,0.015013741,0.00077536266,0.00092542294,0.82630783,0.15211111,0.000042038886],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013498296,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02171032,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022314671,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0104049845,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01142081,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11801267},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1607766645","doi":"","title":"La interpretación actual de las enmiendas de la Constitución de los Estados Unidos","year":2013,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Aequitas Revue de développement humain handicap et changement social","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03713493261888747,"score_gpt":0.41071159969371246,"score_spread":0.373576667074825,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1607766645","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.29752123,0.0076381415,0.00915104,0.026826564,0.0004554625,0.00006146085,0.00050376146,0.0000689023,0.65777344],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9809085,0.0011602939,0.0014006739,0.00040404187,0.0001263109,0.000058777623,0.00010714909,0.000036704518,0.015797516],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99613214,0.0018099446,0.00016138038,0.0004396255,0.0007247073,0.00073224085],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9945263,0.0029006302,0.0006484169,0.0007607127,0.0009438915,0.00022001531],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0076747416,0.00033666013,0.00056904537,0.004152308,0.0100557245,0.014128449,0.001418054,0.002000108,0.007792524],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010631104,0.00031837844,0.00034517603,0.006280309,0.022755858,0.006662342,0.0043745437,0.0042240475,0.00026823542],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015362511,0.0000064153805,0.001351649,0.00003965198,0.000003881267,0.000046477875,0.03422344,0.000058243688,0.000080827725,0.95793927,0.0011008366,0.005133957],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000037653255,0.000044211578,0.03161563,0.00092844915,0.00008617116,0.000209671,0.20469162,0.0006258691,0.00089893694,0.45288706,0.30792984,0.00004486868],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.044357646,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10515894,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.044357646,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014912281,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007591407,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.108196676},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1608151209","doi":"","title":"Fundamentación moral del Ethos. Hacia una rehabilitación del Derecho como disciplina filosófica","year":2013,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Aequitas Revue de développement humain handicap et changement social","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Humanities","score_opus":0.08526421920784988,"score_gpt":0.4169471252986571,"score_spread":0.3316829060908072,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1608151209","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016489336,0.013801933,0.020108586,0.11860321,0.0012964895,0.000076559976,0.000104195366,0.00005082088,0.8294689],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90249103,0.00478954,0.0052508707,0.008223807,0.0011422744,0.00018744057,0.00005655701,0.000057122437,0.0778014],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9947296,0.0031359755,0.00014209379,0.0005755905,0.0009055555,0.0005111906],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99672866,0.0016938825,0.0003122481,0.0005119414,0.0005202723,0.0002329175],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006485992,0.00041081215,0.0004389639,0.0011416859,0.006514239,0.008759537,0.0011143219,0.006092839,0.0074756187],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0064811576,0.00026208334,0.00043538708,0.00074514584,0.052352972,0.0052960566,0.0035305996,0.0077135097,0.0007983643],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000014591797,0.0000042447086,0.00004770563,0.00001045864,0.0000010925417,0.000007955262,0.00063783,0.000031851137,0.000023169234,0.99688005,0.0010826793,0.0012714661],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008881186,0.000008836798,0.00038545806,0.00011130907,0.00000323489,0.00004646668,0.0013323153,0.00017176032,0.00010126111,0.9268719,0.070951924,0.0000064824444],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005440379,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006751238,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008759537,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006643328,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007928571,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.048200905},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1625510545","doi":"","title":"Las Reparaciones en la Jurisprudencia de la Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos (Remedies Under the Jurisprudence of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights)","year":2011,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Political science; Human rights; Humanities; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.017001522198187544,"score_gpt":0.34480880470531894,"score_spread":0.32780728250713137,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1625510545","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11821555,0.038468402,0.015070909,0.1467044,0.0030374264,0.00008325386,0.0001424703,0.00010778104,0.67816985],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94804454,0.004009823,0.004921763,0.014355907,0.0012255971,0.0000682783,0.000031815372,0.000052241816,0.027290082],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98774403,0.006300225,0.00034207405,0.001547529,0.0025795214,0.0014866056],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9907554,0.005726349,0.0006108224,0.0012003622,0.0012009497,0.00050616916],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019100312,0.0003627583,0.0005363469,0.0019686467,0.009910905,0.0123043265,0.001751322,0.008487198,0.003735578],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021664867,0.0005554826,0.00056325644,0.0024790566,0.032909688,0.0051417183,0.004894859,0.013390424,0.0003870628],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000058589544,0.000005816482,0.00014236405,0.000010228532,0.0000020280722,0.000020358168,0.0019509959,0.00006497105,0.000080340935,0.99199694,0.0024439287,0.0032761067],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004698882,0.000026734693,0.003833443,0.00033663306,0.00005878074,0.00013204558,0.0059371092,0.0008126249,0.00082418614,0.70737857,0.28055432,0.000058520098],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0501034,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.095199235,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0501034,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0071398946,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011218222,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1010133},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1695186912","doi":"10.12660/rda.v228.2002.46520","title":"Desvio de poder por atos administrativos, legislativos e jurisdicionais","year":2002,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Revista de Direito Administrativo","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Adidas (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Power (physics); Humanities; Art; Physics","score_opus":0.05218088684472881,"score_gpt":0.35895385924150836,"score_spread":0.30677297239677953,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1695186912","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13538608,0.021526963,0.015990518,0.04765984,0.0006557869,0.00007589771,0.0003707129,0.00012726412,0.7782069],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96548116,0.004350266,0.0029417132,0.0032846832,0.0002798949,0.000071652925,0.00011024267,0.000026579532,0.023453774],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98199064,0.008917579,0.0008555587,0.0016466769,0.005059766,0.0015296681],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9904509,0.004850824,0.0014535881,0.0010977079,0.0015278679,0.0006191079],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008632295,0.00026109174,0.00047537463,0.002235413,0.0049948497,0.010112043,0.0012173111,0.003399713,0.007230494],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013255988,0.00047752514,0.00053643744,0.0034116097,0.022769043,0.004761794,0.005753505,0.004385325,0.00084033905],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000098704295,0.00001586691,0.001323513,0.000083435065,0.000007675464,0.000039275208,0.0042761527,0.00007543763,0.00041453048,0.98526335,0.0018334887,0.006657488],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000037242422,0.00018620856,0.029326098,0.00082644797,0.000067096924,0.00050469575,0.020522716,0.00031580796,0.002424035,0.42872027,0.5170037,0.00006565969],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009231638,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015698446,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010112043,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0068369457,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009499491,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.049605787},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1713673456","doi":"10.30827/acfs.v45i0.531","title":"BIENES CONSTITUCIONALES: EL OBJETIVO DE LA TEORÍA CONSTITUCIONAL","year":2011,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Anales de la Cátedra Francisco Suárez","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.02553223115709057,"score_gpt":0.3491885178630568,"score_spread":0.32365628670596625,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1713673456","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02828348,0.00896304,0.05192552,0.07726624,0.001190638,0.000079440244,0.00017117723,0.00008898489,0.8320315],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7886946,0.0043586474,0.015361857,0.007919582,0.0012188886,0.00029594256,0.00015415873,0.00025910162,0.1817372],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99472576,0.0028842762,0.00011493901,0.00086671865,0.0009039403,0.0005043657],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972077,0.0013557469,0.00026980738,0.00045723352,0.00045571226,0.00025386026],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005096667,0.00054885657,0.0006380119,0.0016628087,0.008956897,0.012126091,0.0010522978,0.0032113362,0.00874528],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005160179,0.00046376543,0.0006614055,0.002289625,0.029981889,0.013972782,0.0055841156,0.006991069,0.0016136243],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000021889985,0.0000015981046,0.000031830077,0.0000053064196,4.7106812e-7,0.000005468054,0.00076632615,0.00002759915,0.000020476233,0.9975777,0.00091966597,0.0006413489],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007478086,0.000009191819,0.00017468103,0.000091708884,0.0000047817316,0.000030648895,0.0013297456,0.00022501539,0.00018582413,0.82921094,0.16872102,0.000008991127],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006442377,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00589605,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012126091,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007669924,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005238156,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05564946},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1717885948","doi":"","title":"CONGRESO INTERNACIONAL SOBRE DERECHO DE FAMILIA, EN JURÍDICAS","year":2005,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Gaceta UNAM (2000-2009)","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Derecho; Political science; Cartography; Geography; Philosophy","score_opus":0.021856253346203638,"score_gpt":0.33982203156014773,"score_spread":0.3179657782139441,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1717885948","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14920785,0.0457095,0.0020738994,0.42729458,0.0139799835,0.0002859351,0.0028884497,0.00032127215,0.35823858],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3606683,0.025101976,0.0023131222,0.017641053,0.0037255378,0.00032461778,0.0014503283,0.000167405,0.5886077],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991468,0.00023541438,0.000024466979,0.00011823558,0.00012888429,0.00034620607],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99760544,0.00033575133,0.00027497075,0.000088695684,0.00044829925,0.0012467611],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015768396,0.00038907683,0.0002661341,0.0006102907,0.006274964,0.0022970494,0.0008042453,0.0015524981,0.025820524],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026633497,0.00025744323,0.00023499441,0.00057398796,0.0012935651,0.0013109422,0.0034996716,0.0031037237,0.0018053245],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002251792,0.00013994047,0.02814031,0.0004609475,0.00004121354,0.0010160755,0.026321407,0.00022498128,0.0018953376,0.03965779,0.79175115,0.110125706],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008371815,0.000029972472,0.026117556,0.00014640574,0.000008569136,0.000076410855,0.006596322,0.00004547882,0.00016907329,0.00037804368,0.96641225,0.000011579256],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13026237,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2298714,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13026237,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0065555484,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015093405,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25900835},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W172220534","doi":"","title":"Lotta al terrorismo: da Bush a Obama, passando per la Corte Suprema","year":2011,"lang":"it","type":"article","venue":"Quaderni costituzionali","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Centre for International Governance Innovation","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Separation of powers; Political science; Law; Deference; Abandonment (legal); Constitution; Judicial review; Judicial deference; Justiciability; Terrorism; Politics","score_opus":0.11252686597443745,"score_gpt":0.3529861975164348,"score_spread":0.24045933154199733,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W172220534","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.27577606,0.035775125,0.0011766198,0.12221606,0.0022065565,0.00004180833,0.00017930685,0.000026118232,0.5626023],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9621774,0.00449696,0.00023457615,0.0052709896,0.00041462405,0.000021864098,0.00003292548,0.000009095331,0.027341569],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994741,0.00028168087,0.000010433436,0.000068591566,0.000075986674,0.000089157475],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99951565,0.0003189719,0.00006080491,0.00002109083,0.00004773779,0.000035779773],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009474899,0.0001358068,0.00011815196,0.00045178906,0.0054550017,0.0033794392,0.0002835993,0.001789441,0.0033305124],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020008464,0.00009752802,0.0000868882,0.00059791206,0.0050543267,0.0014607823,0.00096523017,0.0023450013,0.00024037618],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000045021872,0.000037142425,0.002297215,0.00009253663,0.000006533801,0.00038636016,0.028356379,0.000104159466,0.00059247424,0.9246572,0.025579952,0.017844941],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021782975,0.000061740364,0.015654396,0.0002813693,0.000016736443,0.00037907434,0.03868834,0.00012079935,0.0006544972,0.048141006,0.8959617,0.000018622817],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.030146807,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07226805,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030146807,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0041749896,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001750611,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.059942663},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W17661580","doi":"","title":"El Homenaje al jurista, profesor universitario y ciudadano de la República de las Letras y de las Ciencias Sociales Alfredo Rodríguez García, con el añadido de las particulares consideraciones y reflexiones de Guillermina Martín Reyes, Antonio García Lizana, María Encarnación Gómez Rojo y Stamatios Tzitzis","year":2012,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Revista europea de historia de las ideas políticas y de las instituciones públicas/Revista europea de historia de las ideas políticas y de las instituciones públicas","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Derecho; Garcia; Art; Philosophy","score_opus":0.032293080372353365,"score_gpt":0.3513416217942435,"score_spread":0.31904854142189015,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W17661580","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.094503604,0.09647685,0.0018633503,0.41447535,0.0064198924,0.000031048745,0.00016301419,0.000082918494,0.38598403],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.706795,0.042794906,0.0006499812,0.01902007,0.0022475102,0.000053785807,0.000102201164,0.000091974856,0.22824459],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99785763,0.0011441032,0.000034511286,0.00021479132,0.00032671556,0.00042221148],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983687,0.0006145914,0.00017887959,0.00009621592,0.00039210464,0.00034953922],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001510876,0.00036312884,0.00030264113,0.00081511616,0.00659778,0.0070865406,0.0005967686,0.002458633,0.00891317],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033022624,0.00019146872,0.00025488075,0.0012323463,0.004975117,0.0027740626,0.004388451,0.003589275,0.0012037916],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009442742,0.00006553646,0.009703922,0.00032514278,0.000021684013,0.0007205086,0.058915596,0.00022918089,0.000467129,0.64496064,0.21078542,0.073710985],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006886222,0.000015739406,0.010749179,0.00043415744,0.000009528487,0.0001536754,0.022786824,0.000087386,0.00021270844,0.0120097725,0.95351106,0.000023092929],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.047476847,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08056311,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.047476847,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007581413,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007059887,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.094401},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W179432892","doi":"","title":"El caso Tony Judt: una carta abierta a la Liga Antidifamación","year":2008,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Repository of Digital Objects for Teaching Research and Culture (University of Valencia)","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of California, San Diego; York University; Bard College; Georgetown University; London School of Economics and Political Science; Queen Mary University of London; Bilkent Üniversitesi; Princeton University","keywords":"Humanities; Art","score_opus":0.04823303009219563,"score_gpt":0.36069812757627145,"score_spread":0.3124650974840758,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W179432892","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.027708868,0.12967466,0.0017413258,0.4065392,0.006615884,0.000014810103,0.00020429406,0.00011841796,0.42738262],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.52454865,0.03406204,0.0010995849,0.058580175,0.004623235,0.0000649318,0.0001471642,0.0002404839,0.3766337],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957171,0.001534861,0.00011566502,0.00084471074,0.0011121301,0.00067560776],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969759,0.0014439214,0.00036444145,0.00057448586,0.00040086688,0.00024043264],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002852076,0.00027877098,0.00040312516,0.0017254453,0.0073515447,0.017424237,0.0010990681,0.006748399,0.0142258825],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0069410047,0.00045192623,0.000250434,0.00282283,0.019067597,0.011310553,0.0056619076,0.0059135407,0.0020199816],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003195696,0.000007380057,0.0006118431,0.00008485912,0.0000059454273,0.0002558582,0.019977026,0.000027885557,0.00013882965,0.7788635,0.17877693,0.02121797],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003880545,0.0000044884064,0.00064746477,0.00015715123,0.000002791642,0.00015753297,0.0032564555,0.000016146209,0.000071956754,0.013959057,0.9817145,0.000008653784],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02433049,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03935102,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02433049,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008123195,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003961203,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.058938146},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1872321450","doi":"","title":"Universidad, libertad académica y autonomía universitaria","year":2008,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Actualidad Contable FACES","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mica; Geology","score_opus":0.037321894831010005,"score_gpt":0.31500744549756404,"score_spread":0.27768555066655404,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1872321450","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0040464723,0.099479176,0.0005734621,0.05333103,0.0065467325,0.000027494041,0.0028127583,0.00031995168,0.8328629],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.059887752,0.02860865,0.0015093398,0.0021155986,0.0008608813,0.00010115929,0.0015337087,0.00017867831,0.90520424],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992322,0.000104540595,0.000049347585,0.00019433473,0.00023579603,0.00018381511],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99929214,0.00012444028,0.00007773073,0.000076703174,0.00021354813,0.00021533818],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008200911,0.0007485867,0.00066377927,0.0010467431,0.0032965716,0.007300061,0.00058410043,0.0018892714,0.14160274],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019855855,0.00036938532,0.00031751546,0.0023738558,0.0012669192,0.0041939733,0.0029987535,0.0040630638,0.03539648],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000070221446,0.000055382952,0.0014932627,0.0003214673,0.000011732842,0.00010567638,0.0015208223,0.00007997529,0.00022526004,0.18331097,0.6491216,0.16368365],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005410836,0.0000063893094,0.0025032486,0.00017217566,0.0000025669685,0.000038235852,0.00049488444,0.0000154759,0.00005134515,0.0031193402,0.993586,0.0000049287646],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022714538,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.032863975,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14160274,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005755827,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0062878607,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47370833},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1904969989","doi":"","title":"La regulación de la competición electoral en Canadá: un modelo igualitario","year":2013,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Revista de Estudios Políticos","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.012868021426429855,"score_gpt":0.3392151356405808,"score_spread":0.32634711421415097,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1904969989","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13552202,0.0044073826,0.018510448,0.077245004,0.00024917198,0.0001393735,0.0011289775,0.00014241166,0.76265514],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.933397,0.00272848,0.0024136663,0.0018145512,0.00006788178,0.000042214488,0.00014262003,0.000032028103,0.059361584],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974922,0.00036563442,0.000035669254,0.0002804529,0.00091019727,0.00091596623],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99854004,0.00021375097,0.00012739112,0.000109210276,0.00061797176,0.00039155586],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014625306,0.00037564966,0.0004033012,0.0015949497,0.008175775,0.008710327,0.0014976982,0.001944073,0.010136611],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031815264,0.00027150384,0.00041887411,0.0027340073,0.009217518,0.001727554,0.001898319,0.0018299713,0.00056055497],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018191615,0.000010687752,0.0031705268,0.000034346296,0.000007718322,0.00005353507,0.002153101,0.002545535,0.0001031765,0.9780563,0.00653511,0.007311741],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008670937,0.00006584144,0.027827041,0.00049642345,0.000111667534,0.0001308113,0.01600632,0.017723143,0.0007953064,0.35319483,0.58342427,0.0001376457],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97480917,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97813684,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91603565,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08396432,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14393117,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6092066},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1919089751","doi":"10.15210/interfaces.v7i1.6946","title":"DIREITO CANADENSE: ALGUMAS PARTICULARIDADES.","year":2012,"lang":"pt","type":"article","venue":"LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas)","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Population; Humanities; Law and economics; Law; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04563948030960855,"score_gpt":0.3032451758728577,"score_spread":0.25760569556324914,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1919089751","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06427899,0.008793632,0.0035001673,0.03636895,0.0009680076,0.000078116456,0.00042537355,0.000120654055,0.88546604],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8413443,0.0053024464,0.0020419448,0.006195243,0.00032842744,0.000067065965,0.00029146468,0.00006734534,0.14436178],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9939985,0.00087066664,0.00017854897,0.00089708896,0.002171358,0.0018837076],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99765366,0.00041059102,0.0001758725,0.00029882445,0.0009136362,0.000547481],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003019548,0.00047234693,0.00043526464,0.002288954,0.023501748,0.013704778,0.001773709,0.003133146,0.011318844],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005190806,0.00033430726,0.00043511408,0.0039831437,0.018475015,0.0034636687,0.006742029,0.004316819,0.00084448385],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023816521,0.000012164578,0.0043906923,0.00013812506,0.0000116594,0.00063620537,0.04014285,0.00014405698,0.00040769365,0.9048208,0.021732705,0.02753927],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000071772197,0.000016518778,0.008924898,0.0003370957,0.000043201857,0.000893671,0.052715212,0.0002185249,0.0004936898,0.038791694,0.8975014,0.00005696775],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7563463,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9232884,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24365371,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.030913372,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.048082102,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49017727},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1927495398","doi":"10.22201/iij.24487872e.2013.13.433","title":"Un llamado para repensar las fuentes de derecho Internacional: soft law y la otra cara de la moneda","year":2013,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Anuario Mexicano de Derecho Internacional","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Victoria University; Victoria University of Wellington; McGill University","keywords":"Humanities; Derecho; Philosophy; Cartography; Art; Geography","score_opus":0.019248405090907098,"score_gpt":0.339160907026004,"score_spread":0.3199125019350969,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1927495398","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.44429177,0.008132939,0.022385899,0.07002008,0.00040608947,0.000054148437,0.0000901916,0.000053863925,0.454565],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9842003,0.0010627309,0.00097114465,0.0013384239,0.00009147667,0.000030139234,0.000013925285,0.000014305359,0.012277403],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99560815,0.0023570994,0.00013686763,0.00049499405,0.00076022686,0.0006427745],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9915093,0.0045921286,0.0013334065,0.0009654492,0.0010188135,0.00058089837],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0065320516,0.00027841932,0.00034155237,0.0013309143,0.0053288303,0.0081399055,0.0011817265,0.0025496716,0.005704225],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013021593,0.00023435784,0.00032762365,0.0014195166,0.030500742,0.0069404724,0.0050172205,0.0034224081,0.0003402358],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019960751,0.000013035703,0.0036590896,0.00006895677,0.0000045765905,0.00012183839,0.022186771,0.00012769576,0.00026598555,0.96357673,0.0011555958,0.008799731],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005089453,0.00016058653,0.050623897,0.0014845234,0.00006881638,0.0005775717,0.15918303,0.001460424,0.0022471445,0.49169415,0.29235068,0.00009825926],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019080373,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.036611315,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019080373,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007514356,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0073091406,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.054520726},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1929798149","doi":"10.5944/trc.24.2009.6879","title":"Diseño constitucional e implementación de la Federación canadiense: de Macdonald a Harper","year":2009,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Teoría y Realidad Constitucional","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Art","score_opus":0.017819157338976828,"score_gpt":0.3735978720808749,"score_spread":0.3557787147418981,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1929798149","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13412863,0.01847791,0.005089367,0.05687797,0.00083170773,0.00012711348,0.0002971941,0.00010634513,0.78406376],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.83819634,0.006745017,0.0019808314,0.0042457706,0.00013731261,0.000091837566,0.00012829936,0.000050700593,0.14842387],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979194,0.00059021346,0.00006034185,0.000244575,0.0007112975,0.0004742372],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99830663,0.0004270522,0.00015549955,0.00020051777,0.000661959,0.00024834782],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026697614,0.00023917413,0.00015030963,0.0013872822,0.0039858026,0.0065367906,0.0009905692,0.0013240605,0.0069986475],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0044658734,0.0002242615,0.0001727319,0.002125933,0.008288803,0.0028848588,0.0028506983,0.0021254253,0.00040306442],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003388475,0.000042546497,0.006895334,0.00015756978,0.000019559586,0.0001304733,0.02568052,0.0004429578,0.00056154124,0.88930464,0.020751493,0.055979487],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010384615,0.000030765812,0.02762323,0.00042880402,0.000029396053,0.0000629264,0.011264307,0.0003077158,0.0007716662,0.02925128,0.9301794,0.00004005125],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.45776185,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6024759,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9752995,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.024700532,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.030800315,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.91019475},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1955731170","doi":"10.14201/alh.2702","title":"¿Juicio político o golpe legislativo? Sobre las crisis constitucionales en los años noventa","year":2009,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"AMÉRICA LATINA HOY","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Kellogg's (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Presidential system; Politics; Demise; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.02567557322084683,"score_gpt":0.36149756376512665,"score_spread":0.3358219905442798,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1955731170","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.59231037,0.016203167,0.00061454606,0.07653042,0.00044122062,0.000042660635,0.00025882648,0.000024102088,0.31357473],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9795821,0.0037134723,0.000081572674,0.00157087,0.000101037636,0.000014642759,0.000060177303,0.000005706071,0.014870486],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992029,0.00024649012,0.00001769294,0.00006264962,0.00012095578,0.00034931055],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99863786,0.0005269748,0.00028491762,0.000030679563,0.00022708272,0.00029242545],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013914097,0.00018507817,0.00018690014,0.0010912092,0.0038003146,0.0039722887,0.0003705745,0.0009158323,0.008165388],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024377971,0.000093563795,0.00011037843,0.0012089061,0.0032619068,0.0017409166,0.0019719433,0.001597551,0.00042810175],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004904869,0.00025586606,0.1519297,0.0008668237,0.000044608532,0.0016214597,0.15230107,0.00083962484,0.0011271407,0.47511324,0.0777911,0.13761885],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023064935,0.00007040345,0.2686911,0.0009720713,0.000032661927,0.00027684748,0.16445842,0.0006039732,0.00067425426,0.016457358,0.5477001,0.00003976805],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10846552,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.18596672,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10846552,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008957845,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0057018725,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21566838},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2007929062","doi":"10.1177/000842980103000331","title":"Comptes rendus / Reviews of books: Ley natural y razón práctica: Una visión tomista de la autonomia moral","year":2001,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Studies in Religion/Sciences Religieuses","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Natural (archaeology); Humanities; Geography","score_opus":0.09888371375417401,"score_gpt":0.4686996820655726,"score_spread":0.3698159683113986,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2007929062","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00039340346,0.7788205,0.00046832458,0.058879003,0.039756697,0.00003367698,0.000822092,0.00012939534,0.12069687],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.008845779,0.5296074,0.0010518291,0.028943237,0.037322547,0.00013814413,0.0012788697,0.0004047481,0.39240736],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985134,0.00024896488,0.00011293001,0.00024434464,0.00080172403,0.00007867179],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99597955,0.0016025098,0.00030129426,0.00026012032,0.001537195,0.00031930205],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011750048,0.0013634993,0.0015486903,0.0071060844,0.0017324934,0.007159632,0.0018582197,0.0045291586,0.08578795],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0052129496,0.0006661348,0.000560912,0.013174956,0.004275648,0.005123325,0.0018282935,0.003968391,0.028640362],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011474399,0.000012207866,0.00006253215,0.0009272976,0.000007337679,0.000021425554,0.00016813558,0.000051151903,0.00010542679,0.01014546,0.95347065,0.03501697],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003395105,0.0000031893333,0.0002815707,0.00079515326,0.0000036914512,0.000030013505,0.0001313767,0.000021920834,0.000029872212,0.0017462185,0.99694735,0.000006388471],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01979606,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.049438417,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08578795,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004657143,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008465696,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28698927},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W20090033","doi":"10.7589/0090-3558-46.1.195","title":"Argentina: La Juridicidad en la Sociedad de la Información ¿Qué pasa cuando el Legislador se abstiene?","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"AR: Revista de Derecho Informático","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.012920764974721053,"score_gpt":0.34981709368029756,"score_spread":0.3368963287055765,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W20090033","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.62613505,0.03779024,0.0024473632,0.11999132,0.0022286728,0.000067609384,0.0021623864,0.00028907217,0.20888828],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9535953,0.009253333,0.001154781,0.002926812,0.00066992675,0.00003326386,0.0006070667,0.00004179538,0.03171769],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989768,0.0004302152,0.0000336987,0.00016281343,0.00017502414,0.00022141103],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99825865,0.00032786996,0.0004180316,0.00008642272,0.00042710965,0.00048186016],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016928198,0.00024301611,0.0002739462,0.0006147953,0.002132424,0.0023533516,0.000420111,0.00093745487,0.008345153],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030191506,0.0001604292,0.00011469371,0.0008420548,0.0019440056,0.0013258726,0.0008972316,0.0013938055,0.0008325672],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005519287,0.00024271377,0.37487033,0.0007150425,0.000086411834,0.002891322,0.047815092,0.0005182515,0.0036443402,0.074930996,0.18287121,0.31086242],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030262727,0.0001059275,0.4212454,0.00045250528,0.00002979525,0.0004343624,0.0135570625,0.0005766056,0.0002495886,0.0021048298,0.56116223,0.000051376515],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.19244662,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.23871945,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19244662,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004519314,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0040989756,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38265294},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2018717224","doi":"10.1093/publius/pjt017","title":"Metropolitan Governance in the Federalist Americas: Strategies for Equitable and Integrated Development, edited by Peter K. Spink, Peter M. Ward, and Robert H. Wilson.","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Publius The Journal of Federalism","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Federalist; Metropolitan area; Federalism; Decentralization; Public administration; Corporate governance; Political science; Government (linguistics); Autonomy; Democratization; State (computer science); Multi-level governance; Democracy; Geography; Politics; Economics; Law; Management","score_opus":0.029379516194055866,"score_gpt":0.3199699283303993,"score_spread":0.2905904121363434,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2018717224","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0067148306,0.6018683,0.010780272,0.1365543,0.009946891,0.00011763683,0.00046813276,0.0004583761,0.23309124],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.14258826,0.56642187,0.01602384,0.008616234,0.005259126,0.00030728412,0.0006508935,0.0003080003,0.25982448],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99973685,0.00010306771,0.000012931255,0.000033346918,0.00007188921,0.000041876418],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999798,0.00006119807,0.000030182253,0.00001392382,0.000048172446,0.000048538044],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006411881,0.0006312654,0.0002950235,0.0008999479,0.0017745256,0.004283953,0.0007332496,0.0012257461,0.005415235],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008910941,0.00043813535,0.000255643,0.0020599216,0.0019087056,0.003943998,0.0018962177,0.001992653,0.0012050449],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007776638,0.000029348614,0.00066696055,0.00037519643,0.000012285873,0.00008829183,0.0049303854,0.00073765696,0.0001618158,0.2427513,0.64605063,0.1041884],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000023522184,0.0000040499995,0.00095433905,0.00039626102,0.000003406099,0.000038860733,0.0015572442,0.0001603153,0.000043029562,0.021474067,0.9753625,0.0000035583448],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.025063714,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.053727694,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025063714,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0051566944,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0076475563,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.049835682},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2024224753","doi":"10.24908/eoe-ese-rse.v5i0.644","title":"Medir progresos en educación en derechos humanos: Una experiencia interamericana en marcha","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Encounters in Theory and History of Education","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Human rights education; Political science; Curriculum; Economic Justice; Public administration; Library science; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.019630423367768005,"score_gpt":0.35819503088445753,"score_spread":0.33856460751668954,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2024224753","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.522931,0.0413789,0.0041840896,0.21061714,0.0025288395,0.00012908505,0.00011589531,0.00017318124,0.21794197],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9439523,0.014926935,0.0024339878,0.0054091224,0.00064114225,0.00008740126,0.000035021323,0.00008312572,0.03243093],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98825586,0.008358284,0.00018347375,0.0005755381,0.0015525175,0.0010744486],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9930756,0.003681893,0.0007113849,0.0005086449,0.0008630067,0.0011595157],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016885053,0.0006713201,0.0005993296,0.0012525546,0.013550716,0.010783331,0.0016827857,0.0030312352,0.002532906],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014748376,0.00049797044,0.0004059368,0.002930274,0.017579222,0.006429982,0.010374377,0.007417562,0.00040266232],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012507099,0.00030460328,0.005684368,0.00021826294,0.000014260628,0.00085212593,0.73209065,0.00025092997,0.0008133214,0.14811993,0.020184541,0.09134191],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014489208,0.00008909146,0.0061757932,0.00037658264,0.000010789916,0.00025757388,0.29720005,0.00020812979,0.0005354999,0.0089735305,0.68611485,0.00004363049],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.028069695,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.050473716,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028069695,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012641901,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011298963,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09172386},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2025504431","doi":"10.5216/sec.v16i2.32185","title":"Fronteras y horizontes que nos dan que pensar en los tiempos de la educación en derechos humanos","year":2014,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Sociedade e Cultura","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Quest University Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.016222411251334768,"score_gpt":0.35447312764164607,"score_spread":0.3382507163903113,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2025504431","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17573215,0.0108448705,0.0189085,0.051771708,0.0007551228,0.00006049812,0.00011694306,0.00009918639,0.741711],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93579096,0.0030394662,0.002607477,0.0027367473,0.00018478876,0.000043392494,0.000037341226,0.000046051595,0.055513784],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960145,0.0023282,0.00009669752,0.00045050404,0.0005917276,0.00051843794],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99712604,0.0011954122,0.00040399082,0.00044369034,0.00043522564,0.0003956974],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036083695,0.0003365146,0.00028010894,0.0012477529,0.0061682286,0.009126598,0.0006331441,0.0021112203,0.009220167],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0048373616,0.00021095788,0.00030673895,0.0012222468,0.031147053,0.008113757,0.0060403636,0.0035812757,0.00070484483],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012074414,0.00001839261,0.0014129976,0.000057974867,0.000005004035,0.00012084211,0.051353186,0.000055890654,0.0003746941,0.93376005,0.002037881,0.010790959],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019457219,0.00007201256,0.008876087,0.0005746165,0.000022345032,0.00036905624,0.16711076,0.00021218963,0.0012573786,0.3782493,0.4431944,0.000042351687],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007843277,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021248855,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009220167,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0043697823,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00551303,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03170514},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2052861333","doi":"10.4067/s0718-09502008000200006","title":"CONTRADICCIONES DE LOS FUNDAMENTOS TEÓRICOS DE LA CONSTITUCIÓN CHILENA CON EL ESTADO CONSTITUCIONAL: NOTAS PARA SU REINTERPRETACIÓN","year":2008,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Revista de derecho","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Optech (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03338402854603395,"score_gpt":0.36972348405509853,"score_spread":0.3363394555090646,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2052861333","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17414999,0.008053303,0.01352896,0.06828137,0.00043286558,0.000058326994,0.00033171897,0.000060278893,0.73510313],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9739516,0.002464795,0.0014592367,0.0017661303,0.00019854968,0.00008258427,0.000076845194,0.00004672847,0.01995349],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99663335,0.0018118615,0.00012230141,0.0003486712,0.00078019995,0.00030369617],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9957487,0.0023597355,0.0004797231,0.0006057318,0.00063640083,0.0001697708],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004194475,0.0003656897,0.00038858826,0.0021908581,0.0048720133,0.011104604,0.0010673973,0.0016702064,0.007273774],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007560178,0.00025244968,0.00026315,0.0026562626,0.037258863,0.006910488,0.0046952916,0.0037100331,0.00036536178],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000072338207,0.0000034486332,0.0006574069,0.00005685545,0.000003852501,0.00007365407,0.02097208,0.00007133285,0.000093033705,0.97408265,0.0014704652,0.002508004],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003144322,0.000032267682,0.008001549,0.0009798066,0.0000315202,0.0002924285,0.105884284,0.00074933976,0.00086607854,0.6031296,0.27995744,0.000044192817],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023292249,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04017844,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023292249,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0095861405,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00880038,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06955266},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2083976733","doi":"10.12818/p.0304-2340.2014v64p301","title":"MICHEL VILLEY Y LA CUESTIÓN DE LA DIALÉCTICA JURÍDICA - DOI: 10.12818/P.0304-2340.2014v64p301","year":2014,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Revista da Faculdade de Direito da UFMG","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Dialectic; Philosophy; Context (archaeology); Epistemology; Geography","score_opus":0.021477166212411854,"score_gpt":0.3714312907515158,"score_spread":0.34995412453910396,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2083976733","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012509366,0.13164252,0.0071332725,0.19132787,0.0036687278,0.000026063948,0.00024223211,0.00013780413,0.65331215],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6883482,0.041625895,0.003631701,0.014037378,0.0036969741,0.000110297085,0.00017578721,0.00017858135,0.24819529],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99778336,0.001428191,0.00004660861,0.00022318067,0.0003686206,0.00015004634],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99888915,0.0007233485,0.00010771968,0.000049952374,0.00013983581,0.000090006164],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020407836,0.00047756106,0.00030960175,0.0011598218,0.0042917114,0.0070673884,0.00060797477,0.003577196,0.020813633],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0037814386,0.00021947909,0.00020399374,0.0015502844,0.010898944,0.0058691544,0.0030016063,0.003737893,0.0027272666],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017732624,0.000006781846,0.00021274574,0.00007856541,0.0000027144838,0.00007408364,0.007034872,0.000058203175,0.000078625366,0.9324983,0.047337607,0.012599877],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007575896,0.000009284182,0.00059244124,0.0003110344,0.0000040167383,0.00015568579,0.0033659718,0.000114453025,0.00014429813,0.13152546,0.8637573,0.000012403058],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012967133,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011127106,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020813633,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008137807,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035255656,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0696286},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2112410071","doi":"10.14198/doxa2008.31.16","title":"Algunos aspectos de la metateoría de Principia iuris","year":2008,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"DOXA Cuadernos de Filosofía del Derecho","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Optech (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Humanities; Domain (mathematical analysis); Mathematics","score_opus":0.042998497021014596,"score_gpt":0.35829624559932827,"score_spread":0.31529774857831366,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2112410071","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02307116,0.019836824,0.38755625,0.08506082,0.0048175035,0.00011124785,0.0003657943,0.0011889654,0.47799137],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7427836,0.0079848105,0.12468162,0.014020122,0.005577854,0.00062734936,0.0002644144,0.0009864175,0.10307389],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99384046,0.0032054323,0.00027874057,0.00083904754,0.0014463573,0.00038989985],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99568695,0.0020526194,0.00030021893,0.001156002,0.0006524579,0.00015175229],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0068517225,0.00092809874,0.0008503432,0.0027519374,0.0026837282,0.006577092,0.0024952213,0.0032283468,0.006610306],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00792213,0.0006190013,0.0015052783,0.0017417654,0.013797713,0.009947749,0.0047991555,0.0064914026,0.0018122308],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000050519056,0.000002631438,0.00006911279,0.000025621437,0.000004381677,0.000016230315,0.0005912859,0.0001085343,0.00008002826,0.9955112,0.0014548061,0.0021312586],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000117580785,0.000021454392,0.00023576787,0.00013368891,0.000017040491,0.00015952898,0.0003954272,0.0016447019,0.0005144355,0.87958914,0.11725633,0.000020668233],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002192342,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026366161,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0068517225,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0051742904,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002535899,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.037542284},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2130081002","doi":"10.22201/iij.24484873e.2006.117.3893","title":"Federalismo y democracia","year":2006,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Boletín Mexicano de Derecho Comparado","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.020425637725232915,"score_gpt":0.33828119871811785,"score_spread":0.3178555609928849,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2130081002","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002220672,0.13373902,0.00070631324,0.020202594,0.005323738,0.000037418293,0.00085440604,0.00013253922,0.83678323],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.031153124,0.10829284,0.0006645302,0.0018376198,0.0044110366,0.000046559202,0.0009963925,0.00012479414,0.8524731],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994418,0.00008973404,0.000030007819,0.00012520821,0.0002166305,0.000096662305],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996555,0.00010224834,0.000042106305,0.00004695363,0.00007227125,0.00008108668],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005325076,0.0008345688,0.0007199617,0.0015504298,0.0015945398,0.006891214,0.0005342003,0.0022439887,0.2834883],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012123511,0.00035047918,0.00036250695,0.0030035533,0.002039506,0.0030243276,0.002565905,0.0027033982,0.056585807],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004894597,0.00007323902,0.0013622353,0.0006625678,0.000016890837,0.00012971066,0.0007266672,0.00031824294,0.00036818133,0.17302631,0.62757564,0.1956914],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000042289757,0.0000074783206,0.0013182453,0.00034140368,0.0000026933537,0.000056204295,0.00013905509,0.00006106204,0.000055935277,0.005295078,0.9927147,0.0000040023983],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009541583,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014327289,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2834883,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035982465,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027632338,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9483628},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2132386362","doi":"","title":"Derechos humanos electorales: el caso Yatama contra el Estado de Nicaragua, análisis desde la perspectiva del sistema electoral costarricense","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dialnet (Universidad de la Rioja)","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Optech (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.019396006989133806,"score_gpt":0.3375664959680133,"score_spread":0.3181704889788795,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2132386362","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8207175,0.0036089153,0.00021034601,0.004743556,0.000034645236,0.000043929245,0.00012012114,0.000010031602,0.17051086],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9928271,0.0011715068,0.000073100426,0.00023369993,0.000012212044,0.000021373691,0.000038997416,0.0000036726908,0.005618298],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982299,0.0006893298,0.00005740842,0.0001362941,0.00032023294,0.0005668582],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986206,0.0004889248,0.0003614038,0.0001207658,0.0002979525,0.00011032236],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015746091,0.00018084246,0.00024994477,0.0022286973,0.0049272147,0.00487046,0.00090533315,0.0007480355,0.003353538],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0043274895,0.00014469092,0.00013935329,0.0045546107,0.0055805948,0.0010760265,0.004395649,0.0011079573,0.00020209071],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010720272,0.000028536711,0.16335715,0.0004213937,0.000048262482,0.00275835,0.45314988,0.000436405,0.00089685473,0.32624742,0.0053437143,0.04720488],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007650682,0.00003697581,0.27341986,0.0004636145,0.00004414802,0.00074699207,0.56593096,0.00026762742,0.0005214671,0.0044675176,0.15406482,0.000028427143],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.30790058,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5889952,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.30790058,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0080977855,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0058776825,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.61221683},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2134508815","doi":"10.1093/jicj/mqv043","title":"Ana Isabel Pérez Cepeda (dir.),<i>El principio de Justicia Universal: Fundamentos y límites</i>[<i>The Principle of Universal Justice: Foundations and Limits</i>]Ana Isabel Pérez Cepeda (dir.) and Demelsa Benito Sánchez (ed.),<i>El Principio de Justicia Universal. Una Propuesta de Lege Ferenda</i>[<i>The Principle of Universal Justice. A de Lege Ferenda Proposal</i>]","year":2015,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International Criminal Justice","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Obligation; Economic Justice; Premise; Law; Nationality; Criminal justice; Political science; International law; State (computer science); Sociology; Universal jurisdiction; Human rights; Criminology; Humanities; Philosophy; Immigration; Epistemology","score_opus":0.047377534986639824,"score_gpt":0.37693342590606443,"score_spread":0.3295558909194246,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2134508815","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00067235506,0.7267706,0.001484654,0.14996174,0.044633713,0.00003254006,0.00023011367,0.00010688439,0.076107316],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.027283305,0.6425999,0.0020924658,0.04468659,0.031926505,0.00016653117,0.00042824645,0.00030344003,0.2505131],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99843675,0.00036686336,0.000074559546,0.00030222457,0.0006802547,0.00013943166],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998787,0.00043639983,0.00013265623,0.000041502186,0.00047628325,0.00012626762],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014218776,0.0013651957,0.0006596316,0.0012575364,0.00203715,0.0065832417,0.0011935874,0.0031501225,0.013936648],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033993234,0.0005828825,0.00052612316,0.0018623477,0.002361645,0.0062568793,0.0018870961,0.0064712386,0.008940549],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020676865,0.000014731696,0.0002115101,0.00032450995,0.000008744438,0.000034346165,0.00061197806,0.00008080287,0.00007368842,0.02843169,0.916555,0.05363229],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000037421746,0.0000052525484,0.0005492443,0.0004717937,0.000004885251,0.00007363328,0.0003811696,0.000042936354,0.000048598682,0.0073942062,0.9910172,0.0000074867726],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018106366,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023756871,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018106366,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0048171193,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0054928865,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.046622694},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2172149638","doi":"","title":"Transformación de la democracia en Venezuela: una lectura crítica de la constitución del 99","year":2005,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Repositorio Institucional E-DocUR (Universidad Del Rosario)","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Political science; Argument (complex analysis); Democracy; Politics; Humanities; Presidential system; Polarization (electrochemistry); Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.009378861999925693,"score_gpt":0.3253211199998035,"score_spread":0.3159422579998778,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2172149638","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16251522,0.028582582,0.0020218377,0.1525593,0.0012051123,0.000036440797,0.00011784265,0.000054095726,0.6529076],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96206254,0.0031834801,0.00034370995,0.003861937,0.00025584947,0.000030208552,0.000029171408,0.000025530166,0.030207576],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985808,0.0005572861,0.000030619794,0.00016147451,0.00024411775,0.0004257424],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992755,0.00038046786,0.000074234486,0.000085422675,0.0001024345,0.00008200905],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019467312,0.00031694322,0.00020851496,0.001138237,0.010369997,0.008098348,0.00095714757,0.0024896944,0.0065486087],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004028755,0.0002108929,0.0002470107,0.0014848418,0.015461629,0.0040442785,0.0036684861,0.0050950856,0.00024847942],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024794223,0.000014670965,0.0011605264,0.000052303585,0.000004880531,0.0001858262,0.02877465,0.00015003496,0.00024850885,0.94663525,0.010887109,0.011861421],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000045311386,0.00003450934,0.017154923,0.0008032364,0.00003185058,0.00029537384,0.05463406,0.0006549313,0.0005771002,0.17931299,0.74641633,0.00003938772],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11515785,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2052084,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11515785,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013444424,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005946721,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22897512},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2198751096","doi":"","title":"EL DERECHO INTERNACIONAL Y LAS SANCIONES ECONÓMICAS IMPUESTAS POR EL CONSEJO DE SEGURIDAD DE LAS NACIONES UNIDAS: IMPLICACIONES EN EL CAMPO DE LOS DERECHOS ECONÓMICOS, SOCIALES Y CULTURALES","year":2012,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"International Law: Revista Colombiana de Derecho Internacional","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03544377293727255,"score_gpt":0.3971478491219716,"score_spread":0.361704076184699,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2198751096","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.54593843,0.003500586,0.0033395002,0.013847419,0.00018083813,0.000044192548,0.00014485755,0.00005006755,0.43295398],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9685658,0.0010568554,0.00067427364,0.00054099277,0.000046671707,0.000031681375,0.000038018447,0.00002129792,0.029024402],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966697,0.0014102824,0.00008195425,0.00031172385,0.0006923937,0.0008339005],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99499786,0.0016415396,0.0011611591,0.0003806672,0.00081504526,0.0010038432],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003087309,0.0003452338,0.00033216097,0.0010706327,0.005214372,0.0075980304,0.00090892566,0.0015491343,0.012622755],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0056371274,0.00022542516,0.00029593427,0.0016103275,0.010208284,0.003696123,0.006099435,0.0021344644,0.0005902892],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001522331,0.000086785476,0.0607006,0.00035895198,0.00006350082,0.0010713997,0.15409341,0.0011477079,0.002052311,0.70032346,0.009184698,0.0707649],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027700604,0.0001522505,0.18963496,0.0014114474,0.00006932278,0.0004041162,0.25656027,0.0009031428,0.0013091611,0.048898697,0.5005181,0.00011083518],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07221867,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14762343,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07221867,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01016023,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00978766,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14359659},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2203899788","doi":"10.5354/0719-5249.2001.36305","title":"Prácticas extraconstitucionales de fin de siglo","year":2015,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Revista de Derecho Público","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Literal (mathematical logic); Quarter (Canadian coin); Humanities; State (computer science); Fin; Art; Philosophy; Political science; History; Linguistics; Mathematics; Engineering; Algorithm","score_opus":0.0911701510176986,"score_gpt":0.40346277455172697,"score_spread":0.31229262353402837,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2203899788","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23644625,0.008025151,0.0070187384,0.012937352,0.001947884,0.00017242112,0.00019565281,0.00033614843,0.7329205],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8403616,0.0038648683,0.006055408,0.0017831736,0.0013526727,0.00016001034,0.0001117812,0.00011115731,0.14619927],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961538,0.0016538936,0.00015919976,0.0005528835,0.0008406574,0.000639539],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9940785,0.0027654755,0.0005396801,0.0012567645,0.00088155287,0.00047810187],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005064814,0.00048283683,0.0002494779,0.0015710471,0.005805531,0.00347792,0.0014505907,0.0019312036,0.0073502576],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008902132,0.00022360432,0.0003197488,0.0016665467,0.006485673,0.0013806964,0.002773499,0.0039075487,0.0013572127],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020623505,0.00049750897,0.0107623525,0.0006224749,0.00001942006,0.0012585021,0.055660557,0.0010028962,0.0032809381,0.6329131,0.035325658,0.2584503],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000042997148,0.0002452834,0.013058473,0.0006566234,0.000025916543,0.00042892524,0.015558998,0.00041966126,0.002737043,0.009324934,0.95744985,0.000051155712],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016847268,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04860542,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016847268,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0051809903,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006952916,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03759086},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2223133756","doi":"","title":"S NCHEZ CORDERO, A LA REAL ACADEMIA DE JURISPRUDENCIA","year":2012,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Gaceta UNAM (2010-2016)","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.03869253255945011,"score_gpt":0.36374655343574164,"score_spread":0.32505402087629154,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2223133756","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010239378,0.04389837,0.0023519436,0.33498207,0.00564057,0.000030069341,0.00006446548,0.00012900519,0.6026641],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.33037546,0.021293985,0.0025149288,0.050228927,0.0037400585,0.00008215658,0.00009097687,0.0002309928,0.5914426],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99430895,0.0022902559,0.00016351425,0.0009794533,0.0016885123,0.00056929333],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9948073,0.0020082933,0.00045015095,0.0004994728,0.0013734892,0.0008612512],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038280298,0.00054416887,0.00048322082,0.0009998746,0.0124727795,0.012423931,0.00093501114,0.005693949,0.014822525],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008605925,0.00034655366,0.00045792316,0.0009070691,0.013254347,0.005364362,0.0045824368,0.009438394,0.003041005],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030812746,0.000028483162,0.0006150448,0.00009020751,0.000006400634,0.0001644559,0.007430692,0.000101106954,0.00031603384,0.86161554,0.10571301,0.023888212],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009920738,0.000018623094,0.0012020975,0.000260776,0.0000052864198,0.00009650902,0.0030717442,0.00014850931,0.0001991733,0.05926582,0.93570644,0.000015062597],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.042662762,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07708828,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.042662762,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011050295,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015059996,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08482891},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2253721968","doi":"","title":"EXTENSO LEGADO ACADÉMICO DE JORGE CARPIZO","year":2012,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Gaceta UNAM (2010-2015)","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Art; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04769581760138006,"score_gpt":0.37752247881495965,"score_spread":0.3298266612135796,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2253721968","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0020230766,0.14921674,0.0015914628,0.4380927,0.30769047,0.00007070109,0.00038474597,0.0003667314,0.10056335],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.030351602,0.08361025,0.0015985455,0.115292236,0.18341875,0.00013445283,0.00030915762,0.00076561334,0.5845194],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99649173,0.0008364865,0.00015707586,0.0008076494,0.0013386139,0.00036846937],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9924729,0.0017228393,0.0005253514,0.00028176498,0.0030532565,0.0019439965],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003291751,0.0014971324,0.0008467718,0.0037429822,0.0041531464,0.008724269,0.0015902035,0.003963479,0.026586667],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011612436,0.000440864,0.00064060936,0.0019456196,0.0028617026,0.004827845,0.0037509492,0.0068973685,0.012906335],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031387306,0.000021334485,0.00019261871,0.00023004005,0.000005141331,0.00016749262,0.0009226351,0.00005412059,0.00022818478,0.010842654,0.9728535,0.014450779],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000019786069,0.0000053266867,0.00015860103,0.00016690104,0.0000019947759,0.0000662195,0.00027788032,0.000020898085,0.00006900089,0.0008905613,0.9983346,0.000006046764],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013684765,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022836007,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026586667,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008737406,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009692654,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.088941336},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2269288550","doi":"","title":"Internally Displaced Persons and Indigenous Peoples: The Necessity of a Special Protection Regime (Desplazamientos Internos Y Pueblos Indígenas: Sobre La Necesidad De Un Régimen De Protección Especial)","year":2008,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Political science; Human rights; Internally displaced person; Globe; Law; Convention; Political economy; Sociology; Medicine; Refugee","score_opus":0.012964424756551315,"score_gpt":0.28043604944409295,"score_spread":0.26747162468754165,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2269288550","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.44531527,0.011169292,0.0035869551,0.118781164,0.00042909966,0.000094619005,0.000027357684,0.000013642566,0.42058262],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98642355,0.001696596,0.00064518495,0.0040224544,0.00014559552,0.000051598672,0.0000043376886,0.0000030672934,0.007007582],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964779,0.001955139,0.00008017025,0.00023800234,0.00037830378,0.00087047595],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99892443,0.0006811344,0.00014084269,0.00006496864,0.00007985253,0.00010863859],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003914892,0.00020620589,0.00035942896,0.0006852399,0.010185986,0.0064996337,0.0011419153,0.0064852885,0.0017021173],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029004992,0.00024018328,0.0002604381,0.000739986,0.04226551,0.0036759842,0.0055268584,0.005273091,0.00011546571],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000044981816,0.000012763111,0.00044978538,0.000029304429,0.000002172444,0.00021846379,0.035181757,0.00004009174,0.00012210495,0.9607125,0.0006330001,0.0025936079],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005685653,0.0001536295,0.008909033,0.0010039135,0.000058188805,0.0011788579,0.28474578,0.000590289,0.0011110195,0.52557486,0.1765164,0.00010113583],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.028151926,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.038063183,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028151926,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005285243,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008448402,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.055976152},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2282560196","doi":"10.7202/1100696ar","title":"EN BÚSQUEDA DEL NUEVO DERECHO INDÍGENA","year":2023,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Revue québécoise de droit international","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Derecho; Geography; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.029895613039557987,"score_gpt":0.34481363673970106,"score_spread":0.31491802370014305,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2282560196","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14687237,0.08202194,0.012089589,0.1426677,0.0044716713,0.00006966068,0.00028793863,0.00011233035,0.6114068],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8591663,0.037016578,0.0038299426,0.015272449,0.0014257599,0.00010962483,0.00016909896,0.0001298348,0.082880385],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9954951,0.0024504007,0.0001201905,0.0005764821,0.000868827,0.0004890594],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965238,0.0014534048,0.0005112302,0.00035734934,0.0008124962,0.00034179582],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039939187,0.00056179217,0.00045732094,0.001808468,0.004996952,0.009598957,0.0010722689,0.0024234785,0.008676298],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0059485254,0.00020393191,0.00046664051,0.0028979254,0.015757006,0.007653928,0.004225502,0.0045351177,0.0012692187],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005049374,0.000031206644,0.007900923,0.00033023255,0.00002253721,0.00033996644,0.10959868,0.000120425684,0.00043411602,0.8196171,0.016138962,0.045415416],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010274576,0.00003630678,0.012538633,0.0017129269,0.00003445905,0.00066946185,0.10899288,0.00022431115,0.00049269194,0.111680575,0.7635517,0.000055750643],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.027580597,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03463026,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9724194,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0073725577,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008059418,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.054840088},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2286488511","doi":"10.7202/1100694ar","title":"EL DERECHO DE ACCESO A LA JURISDICCIÓN EN MÉXICO Y OTROS PAISES DE AMERICA LATINA","year":2023,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Revue québécoise de droit international","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.023371813149178154,"score_gpt":0.35546109796810466,"score_spread":0.3320892848189265,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2286488511","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.80485684,0.010923869,0.0009877499,0.037064694,0.00031278937,0.000041174284,0.00029826938,0.00003296548,0.14548159],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98586255,0.0031150838,0.00021693554,0.0017695372,0.00008525437,0.000030254178,0.000057779478,0.0000075573657,0.008854908],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99886703,0.00041435257,0.00003335698,0.00013127415,0.00022333596,0.0003306974],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99789894,0.00064669206,0.0007037066,0.000086126194,0.000356926,0.00030755156],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018492611,0.00014313834,0.00013925553,0.0010360477,0.0052781813,0.0033082473,0.00052958797,0.0008355468,0.0045615626],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004481912,0.00014912146,0.00010737209,0.0015796421,0.004504106,0.0017480346,0.0035319552,0.0012052056,0.00011661781],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019741007,0.00007632052,0.2376124,0.00052489055,0.00005698307,0.0035477232,0.41122282,0.00019756018,0.0012357195,0.17166495,0.039643157,0.13402005],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001939242,0.000059346523,0.31190446,0.001383178,0.00004810109,0.0010329126,0.32787815,0.00016925078,0.00027352353,0.005492065,0.35169473,0.000044859225],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.25478354,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.311458,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.25478354,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006968658,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005138931,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5066011},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2339861418","doi":"","title":"UTILIZACIÓN DEL DERECHO CONSTITUCIONAL COMPARADO EN LA INTERPRETACIÓN CONSTITUCIONAL: NUEVOS RETOS A LA TEORÍA CONSTITUCIONAL The use of compared constitutional law in constitutional interpretation: new challenges to the constitutional theory","year":2007,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Adjudication; Constitutional law; Political science; Law; Argumentation theory; Context (archaeology); Situated; Interpretation (philosophy); Constitutional review; Humanities; Philosophy; Geography; Epistemology","score_opus":0.07942994834887632,"score_gpt":0.36450615298498357,"score_spread":0.2850762046361073,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2339861418","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14525503,0.029277965,0.24292484,0.08410938,0.0025509032,0.00014338791,0.00019491828,0.00019380964,0.49534974],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9609239,0.0031355906,0.02713141,0.0015050374,0.0010473715,0.00013497619,0.000057664358,0.0002094725,0.0058547254],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.95255566,0.038984936,0.00088929624,0.002579628,0.004287489,0.0007030043],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9490636,0.040757194,0.0018904437,0.004835614,0.0030514973,0.00040167078],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.044482306,0.00061238883,0.0012235083,0.004174316,0.005591717,0.021984039,0.0028021766,0.0036935916,0.004507571],"category_scores_gemma":[0.047173887,0.00047306088,0.0007208521,0.004660002,0.061495304,0.030146567,0.007814221,0.0066183833,0.00033347867],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001147845,0.0000040701257,0.0002026094,0.000032625518,0.00000458006,0.000024343763,0.010038443,0.000053369033,0.00007274709,0.9855664,0.00030618702,0.003683129],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030347901,0.000042618234,0.0009505855,0.0006770751,0.000039648825,0.0001926617,0.018990695,0.0019395734,0.00093515706,0.8699122,0.10625404,0.00003534571],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037662562,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004845044,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.044482306,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008340139,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0049669724,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23524773},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2345767012","doi":"","title":"El Derecho de Defensa en la Jurisprudencia de la Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos (The Right of Defence under the Jurisprudence of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights)","year":2010,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Humanities; Political science; Human rights; Derecho; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.007362217167607629,"score_gpt":0.3370642327637867,"score_spread":0.32970201559617907,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2345767012","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12643027,0.012248881,0.0085044885,0.061254557,0.00080488325,0.00007778047,0.00011618305,0.00004374584,0.7905193],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9373979,0.0025562271,0.0014833455,0.008922288,0.00038702722,0.00006366506,0.000037893187,0.000031211133,0.049120553],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99017227,0.0048795277,0.00022986475,0.0010787022,0.0024454824,0.0011941985],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9938933,0.003294918,0.00059218745,0.0005198755,0.0013494832,0.0003502199],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0077729374,0.00024636343,0.00032690074,0.001172236,0.006984802,0.011573654,0.0010241966,0.004072367,0.0061500682],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007368849,0.00025768977,0.00034300983,0.0012376144,0.02199035,0.0037425447,0.005885305,0.006501417,0.0005998762],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016698637,0.000009092139,0.0013355955,0.000057621968,0.0000051142797,0.00015770955,0.01666448,0.000084431624,0.00032649058,0.96762776,0.0062905643,0.0074244696],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000034722194,0.00007040696,0.014009326,0.00080534554,0.000046354777,0.00056720845,0.041236933,0.0005834599,0.001698613,0.30569002,0.6351829,0.00007465128],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.026757961,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.039384995,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026757961,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0056440705,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010521781,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.053204417},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W235349360","doi":"","title":"The Inter-American Human Rights System in Crisis","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the Annual Meeting-American Society of International Law","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Context (archaeology); Human rights; Law; Authoritarianism; Public administration; Democracy; Politics; Geography","score_opus":0.013329862375810348,"score_gpt":0.3080409295311624,"score_spread":0.29471106715535206,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W235349360","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.026429657,0.011201169,0.0004794076,0.7615615,0.0075563164,0.00008666916,0.00011618582,0.000057710164,0.1925113],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5355051,0.014237599,0.00093774643,0.28979835,0.0063172635,0.00031023732,0.0002360636,0.00015913512,0.1524985],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9950245,0.0018965305,0.00014517293,0.00042848164,0.0007060676,0.0017991068],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977126,0.00064528815,0.00014439887,0.000087375694,0.00047269533,0.00093768386],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0043510804,0.00045781687,0.0005002515,0.0008479624,0.020106962,0.015749803,0.0013335358,0.011103086,0.01830392],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0047215633,0.0004069665,0.00034506185,0.0013643386,0.006838808,0.011117059,0.0074385824,0.012613695,0.0014223184],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007197435,0.00012202219,0.0028777153,0.00019226667,0.000014295304,0.0010285608,0.05153335,0.00020285496,0.0009274813,0.22967133,0.66952497,0.043833267],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011283695,0.000017611013,0.0041470593,0.000249322,0.00000412346,0.00013823088,0.062134862,0.00011973466,0.0001362955,0.0229237,0.910086,0.000031804684],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023409147,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.036056746,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023409147,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008717159,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014178183,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06324774},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2408761573","doi":"","title":"Bjarne Melkevik y su particular visión de la epistemología jurídica","year":2015,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Revista europea de historia de las ideas políticas y de las instituciones públicas/Revista europea de historia de las ideas políticas y de las instituciones públicas","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03199347303606025,"score_gpt":0.34355736777605506,"score_spread":0.3115638947399948,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2408761573","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0103715295,0.10305154,0.010366394,0.4046665,0.013949558,0.000055917528,0.00027021812,0.00016008048,0.4571083],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.36338088,0.04124617,0.008565761,0.090104826,0.0047145104,0.00023160022,0.00022150889,0.00039270002,0.491142],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99375266,0.0028438242,0.00026611343,0.0009555357,0.0013787358,0.0008032107],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997233,0.0013764903,0.0002313732,0.00017613481,0.0005841264,0.00039891098],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042310087,0.0008267809,0.00076212717,0.0017198692,0.012589583,0.014975609,0.0019326758,0.010036371,0.010341501],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0067372695,0.00044659732,0.00051462493,0.0017994273,0.022312276,0.008591068,0.0056103156,0.011275288,0.0036127025],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025451336,0.000010257001,0.00020918265,0.00011096889,0.000005750134,0.0001380556,0.010115847,0.00011292135,0.00011858562,0.9106378,0.07161188,0.0069032586],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000625662,0.000008951996,0.00026471136,0.00037602946,0.0000048278903,0.00014765674,0.0049057966,0.00010629536,0.00017013577,0.07997866,0.9140002,0.000030566123],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07831025,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09075199,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07831025,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0122810695,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01722719,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15570885},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2411071458","doi":"","title":"Palabra de abundancia: saberes indígenas que fortalecen diálogos interculturales de derechos humanos en la Amazonia colombiana","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Americanae (AECID Library)","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Amazon rainforest; Humanities; Geography; Philosophy; Biology; Ecology","score_opus":0.02567007427973995,"score_gpt":0.33122271278398524,"score_spread":0.3055526385042453,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2411071458","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9162176,0.0038254508,0.00055108365,0.0027301495,0.000027826576,0.00002039633,0.00013668353,0.000016105892,0.07647467],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9961886,0.00073930423,0.00019087484,0.00008464431,0.0000068790896,0.0000081105745,0.000020841373,0.0000068973263,0.0027537807],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99883586,0.0004797535,0.000032116754,0.00015797584,0.00018690326,0.00030731905],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985739,0.0005499614,0.00037695773,0.00010475976,0.00020957198,0.0001847899],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012532944,0.00031093878,0.00030516268,0.001869042,0.0062606367,0.0060709673,0.0007220807,0.0006145355,0.005051481],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031210035,0.00024661253,0.00012842742,0.001902888,0.0065080426,0.002654493,0.0036625077,0.0008987966,0.00017620869],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006268134,0.000021233021,0.07237363,0.00019695617,0.000016680602,0.00060346693,0.8696993,0.000073759315,0.0016294741,0.028214885,0.0013974519,0.025710613],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000046465507,0.000020781601,0.14934781,0.00027635766,0.000021960926,0.0003617909,0.77278596,0.00014655208,0.00030966016,0.0017833789,0.07491198,0.000029091725],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1917747,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.40590852,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1917747,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006351513,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030526142,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3813169},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2419599525","doi":"","title":"La anticoncepción como acto contra la vida y los casos de violación. La solución de G. Grisez","year":2012,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Alpha Omegan","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Humanities; Political science","score_opus":0.024101068837851056,"score_gpt":0.3760991621746144,"score_spread":0.35199809333676335,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2419599525","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.048419803,0.04961784,0.0072608897,0.2963798,0.0033939416,0.000031924355,0.00010517766,0.000027593942,0.59476304],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91271406,0.013089481,0.0019057918,0.030090649,0.0017322827,0.00006056483,0.000043688247,0.00003962386,0.040324003],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9914206,0.0047298274,0.00031323382,0.00093457015,0.0018035714,0.0007982413],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98992085,0.0075267376,0.000714892,0.0008206433,0.0006846574,0.0003321606],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00882304,0.0004151604,0.0005378907,0.0015605869,0.00561603,0.007214288,0.0014790299,0.0105056595,0.0039355997],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016991744,0.00038705472,0.0005403148,0.0012975457,0.040131453,0.005881565,0.0040295413,0.011351708,0.0003992253],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007711505,0.000008175656,0.00041785737,0.000021098806,0.0000022637169,0.000044911518,0.0017397255,0.00003146895,0.000044366447,0.991507,0.0034818726,0.0026936405],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022438242,0.000039596205,0.002934237,0.0005950155,0.000028462093,0.00054422644,0.005913339,0.00033522327,0.00040972026,0.7618131,0.22733696,0.000027683445],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0076192017,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012874481,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0105056595,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00408435,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005605633,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.046661258},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2467154805","doi":"","title":"José Miguel Gambra y Manuel Oriol, Lógica aristotélica - José Miguel Gambra y Manuel Oriol, Ejercicios de lógica aristotélica","year":2009,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Alpha Omegan","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Art","score_opus":0.02191420628507347,"score_gpt":0.35137901785263637,"score_spread":0.3294648115675629,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2467154805","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010746276,0.31896725,0.009905711,0.36126083,0.008113126,0.000039834453,0.00027504878,0.00017693432,0.290515],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.40520793,0.20435764,0.018550655,0.061966397,0.018437494,0.0002473746,0.00029926933,0.0005848559,0.29034844],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982004,0.00082333223,0.00004678613,0.00022547905,0.00056362746,0.00014035379],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979329,0.001350883,0.000110851535,0.00011480648,0.00040643165,0.000084137486],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036350316,0.000625705,0.0007450176,0.0022896118,0.005614776,0.008099467,0.0015681827,0.005182168,0.010393953],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007442199,0.00054629444,0.00045775837,0.0036820215,0.0060927607,0.0063292067,0.001998281,0.0068933456,0.0015618749],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021603242,0.000021156082,0.00014428218,0.00007402911,0.000010795776,0.000043551274,0.002137503,0.00009254027,0.00008976893,0.93210524,0.05795936,0.007300161],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000047679787,0.00001459101,0.0011441361,0.00043264672,0.00003653241,0.00012179956,0.0033274293,0.00036496593,0.00039883633,0.4512257,0.5428555,0.00003022506],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.040716927,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.059507165,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.040716927,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0055018594,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00386854,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08095986},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2467685831","doi":"10.22201/iij.24485306e.2011.7.7760","title":"Federalism and constitutional Judicial Review in Mexico and the united states: a Normative Assessment of two Different Jurisdictional schemes","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Mexican Law Review","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"York University","keywords":"Federalism; Normative; Law; Political science; Judicial review; Politics","score_opus":0.06372745995547327,"score_gpt":0.3919226954474803,"score_spread":0.328195235492007,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2467685831","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.42326194,0.038787298,0.026597936,0.12033855,0.0004926372,0.00021203364,0.00017880883,0.00008225868,0.3900486],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9889819,0.0024129678,0.0027931742,0.0023616524,0.0002825548,0.00015174664,0.000030286006,0.00001001546,0.002975565],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9777875,0.013680562,0.00085109076,0.0019144904,0.0035686265,0.002197651],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9730992,0.020255538,0.0028955126,0.0013089122,0.0019061468,0.0005347412],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.023187267,0.00021452786,0.00090769713,0.0040224916,0.008429598,0.014199967,0.0016635259,0.0064151934,0.0018934185],"category_scores_gemma":[0.038544584,0.00060205336,0.0005650007,0.0032012856,0.027371457,0.007788551,0.004858925,0.0047420976,0.00009777515],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009933455,0.0000062102604,0.00046829428,0.000018304185,0.000004898386,0.000026497475,0.0012612105,0.00017764076,0.000044221488,0.99535286,0.00034559637,0.0022844453],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014654707,0.000075282165,0.012002159,0.00056022854,0.00008828017,0.00016915324,0.0052695074,0.00317655,0.000520132,0.91035783,0.06756112,0.00007316876],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.028411005,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.037683014,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028411005,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014030303,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0132677,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12262744},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2483182129","doi":"10.1016/j.mexlaw.2016.07.006","title":"THE EXHAUSTION OF DOMESTIC REMEDIES AND THE NOTION OF AN EARLY STAGE IN THE CASE OF BREWER CARÍAS. IS THE INTER-AMERICAN HUMAN RIGHTS SYSTEM AT RISK?","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Mexican Law Review","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México; Universidad de Guadalajara; Canadian Bureau for International Education","keywords":"Stage (stratigraphy); Human rights; Law; Political science; Business; Law and economics; Sociology; Biology","score_opus":0.028736661397032282,"score_gpt":0.36712501990105895,"score_spread":0.33838835850402665,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2483182129","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.40651917,0.06020304,0.011926636,0.08717895,0.0006412215,0.00013259842,0.00009367827,0.000035169847,0.4332696],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98533773,0.0023742854,0.00076626247,0.0035381438,0.000084585,0.000030915795,0.00000870903,0.0000064142178,0.007852876],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99489564,0.0024665487,0.0001794034,0.0005131459,0.0008640064,0.0010811499],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.991981,0.00609987,0.00075869204,0.00038810424,0.00053403,0.00023826676],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0073946514,0.00021100433,0.00037166046,0.0020658702,0.0062581333,0.009124556,0.0014654184,0.0074598733,0.0017681766],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015433504,0.00036663358,0.0004063224,0.0012246986,0.025603728,0.0068762256,0.0038016487,0.0073401574,0.000112827816],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014334526,0.000008629073,0.00087750395,0.000058944213,0.0000042506867,0.00032924575,0.007438017,0.00012128446,0.00028545194,0.98476714,0.000945893,0.005149253],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000066990404,0.00016708285,0.021616757,0.0018537419,0.0001256921,0.0010801795,0.039947573,0.0008943177,0.0030006333,0.6667785,0.2642861,0.00018247239],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.049799085,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1039465,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.049799085,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009109423,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008374642,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.099018455},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2512364828","doi":"10.21501/23394536.2082","title":"Colombia: ¿Una democracia censitaria?","year":2016,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Summa Iuris","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Optech (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.025835378393868402,"score_gpt":0.3504440447424479,"score_spread":0.3246086663485795,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2512364828","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05359895,0.055884123,0.0015488018,0.0828108,0.0014666165,0.0000569495,0.00064184633,0.00015173141,0.80384016],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9099679,0.012883774,0.00077618,0.0052555217,0.0007210574,0.000046597317,0.00029223817,0.000058400503,0.06999848],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99802727,0.000650162,0.00004466979,0.00032966552,0.0004056394,0.00054269034],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983108,0.00040027857,0.00023516222,0.00020505622,0.00037128507,0.00047745588],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010110751,0.00043285053,0.00039020824,0.0018722768,0.0064268415,0.013483134,0.0006731874,0.0015448616,0.017746387],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0035389774,0.0001739114,0.00020781194,0.0018662163,0.0061293743,0.00363317,0.0024676623,0.002128505,0.0010877909],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010252471,0.000024505978,0.011205787,0.00069757167,0.00003451444,0.0005268981,0.02298501,0.00045013553,0.00037034508,0.7582154,0.12141257,0.08397478],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001596519,0.000015352605,0.019105216,0.00056044955,0.000026586948,0.00015560184,0.016319934,0.00025258792,0.00018900738,0.022140505,0.94117373,0.000045095596],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.33451578,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.44870976,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.33451578,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015839176,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009833885,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.66513735},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2522761415","doi":"10.7202/1067945ar","title":"DESARROLLO DE LA JURISPRUDENCIA EN CHILE SOBRE LA CONSULTA INDÍGENA: LOS CASOS DEL TRIBUNAL CONSTITUCIONAL Y LA CORTE SUPREMA","year":2020,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Revue québécoise de droit international","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tribunal; Humanities; Political science; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.016978939112066698,"score_gpt":0.3152872854229678,"score_spread":0.2983083463109011,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2522761415","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21076965,0.018213538,0.0025931753,0.18186396,0.00067076297,0.00011232175,0.00012490417,0.000037053593,0.5856146],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9191327,0.0060865427,0.0007137298,0.010243265,0.00025383776,0.00011492434,0.00004028806,0.000035976245,0.06337863],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99436426,0.0028775362,0.00017749495,0.0004186439,0.0010343335,0.0011277151],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9939528,0.0030753065,0.0005736256,0.00035364338,0.0012879808,0.0007566516],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004867422,0.00032204692,0.0003935017,0.0019067507,0.012548371,0.011913702,0.0012824953,0.0031794778,0.0076515195],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010683139,0.00028021366,0.00034972257,0.0023619877,0.02237095,0.0049516405,0.00793099,0.0052549117,0.0005329034],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033724962,0.000032204352,0.0065922933,0.00024098506,0.000013433581,0.0010542441,0.16536394,0.00022729719,0.00035378177,0.79108596,0.017354365,0.017647825],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000373821,0.000054471144,0.019204788,0.0017568925,0.000032941953,0.00039294697,0.19983053,0.00043399984,0.00046981493,0.07677979,0.70092785,0.00007865058],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.16942786,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.24348795,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16942786,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.029458731,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.041477334,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33688337},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2523785034","doi":"10.7202/1068393ar","title":"THE ROLE OF INTERNATIONAL REGIMES IN THE CONSTITUTION OF STATE BEHAVIOR AND IDENTITY: THE CASE OF CONTEMPORARY MEXICO","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue québécoise de droit international","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Argument (complex analysis); Normative; Politics; Constitution; State (computer science); Political science; Argumentation theory; International relations; Identity (music); Law and economics; Political economy; Sociology; Environmental ethics; Law; Epistemology","score_opus":0.03181577027410935,"score_gpt":0.3339108188424717,"score_spread":0.30209504856836233,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2523785034","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.720283,0.0024017226,0.0039682034,0.015132051,0.000048380105,0.00004070254,0.00003931992,0.000022431608,0.25806424],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99639314,0.00040457415,0.00040835963,0.0002042733,0.000015269401,0.00003145547,0.000009152152,0.0000049704468,0.0025287142],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99842715,0.000847341,0.000030834104,0.00014212476,0.00010573102,0.00044689587],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990564,0.00049830857,0.00022507037,0.00008772055,0.000055194698,0.0000773228],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027833672,0.00013567232,0.0002988686,0.00091039255,0.011661817,0.006048359,0.00072430854,0.0023191508,0.0025512776],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026803878,0.00016562971,0.00023116634,0.0013835594,0.019796986,0.0032462163,0.004124942,0.002472369,0.000073124465],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001622045,0.000018957824,0.0031392148,0.000017761362,0.0000043272953,0.0002839729,0.038938127,0.00022026691,0.0000934797,0.9525493,0.00040658202,0.0043118354],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010303796,0.00010980767,0.049552962,0.0007307238,0.00012211683,0.0008056119,0.26513866,0.0030531976,0.0011872831,0.3967493,0.28234568,0.00010172327],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0492278,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.068124995,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0492278,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008378852,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032910535,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09788251},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2525482541","doi":"10.7202/1068392ar","title":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS AND THE INTER-AMERICAN SYSTEM OF HUMAN RIGHTS PROMOTION AND PROTECTION. STRATEGIC EXPLOITATION OF WINDOWS OF OPPORTUNITY","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue québécoise de droit international","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Promotion (chess); Exploit; International relations; International relations theory; Human rights; Order (exchange); Political science; Law and economics; International trade; Political economy; Law; Sociology; Economics; Computer security; Computer science","score_opus":0.06725276993745051,"score_gpt":0.3183040711625607,"score_spread":0.2510513012251102,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2525482541","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.043420263,0.01589805,0.003586389,0.0276001,0.0002557703,0.000037692604,0.000049879138,0.0000331576,0.90911865],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97797686,0.002457401,0.0010482263,0.0018568641,0.00014214257,0.000043610533,0.000016884125,0.000012647265,0.016445471],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9938585,0.0028315831,0.00015458393,0.0007134646,0.0011587158,0.0012831631],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972023,0.0011055493,0.00044281792,0.00033692794,0.00038826978,0.00052419974],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0050605265,0.0002957712,0.0002702536,0.0031857057,0.011393407,0.014352206,0.00079436816,0.0033303022,0.004194513],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004029055,0.00017758268,0.00025583076,0.0042768517,0.0638324,0.004702602,0.004025083,0.003838366,0.00026235386],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000016528023,0.0000036105241,0.00022055648,0.0000068146674,0.0000011014826,0.000020269463,0.0040748883,0.000029725472,0.000052427986,0.9921949,0.00050862704,0.0028854776],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013046277,0.00004135022,0.00871019,0.00036853502,0.0000120086415,0.00017135496,0.028969439,0.00030971877,0.00016697704,0.5251036,0.43609864,0.000035184992],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13844877,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2127701,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13844877,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.021658463,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018587064,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27528584},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2526211251","doi":"10.7202/1100691ar","title":"LE STATUT DE LA DÉCLARATION AMÉRICAINE DES DROITS ET DES DEVOIRS DE L’HOMME, REFLET DE L’ÉVOLUTION DU SYSTÈME INTERAMÉRICAIN DE PROTECTION DES DROITS DE LA PERSONNE","year":2023,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue québécoise de droit international","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Art","score_opus":0.03118975232040039,"score_gpt":0.33477131642597013,"score_spread":0.30358156410556975,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2526211251","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019029642,0.012944685,0.013833299,0.2463293,0.013861977,0.00029594093,0.0016990964,0.0002984982,0.6917076],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.17067666,0.0067216684,0.017038872,0.16580169,0.001655227,0.00051877263,0.0013992356,0.00037078687,0.63581705],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98575586,0.0042540967,0.0008516925,0.0017277887,0.005058224,0.00235227],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98519844,0.006827335,0.00091240247,0.0012789215,0.004587535,0.001195371],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010564103,0.0007334459,0.000597887,0.0010806677,0.0087486915,0.010070212,0.002178308,0.010218127,0.010862365],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022416286,0.00072221254,0.0010668671,0.0014270867,0.010545876,0.004455193,0.005225752,0.018420178,0.0035828091],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005454112,0.000034370223,0.0018065674,0.00022224303,0.00002438404,0.0002570954,0.0119940825,0.0002450058,0.0011008005,0.7422915,0.22181682,0.020152677],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010032004,0.000015904918,0.002009945,0.00029206494,0.000012063563,0.00009556538,0.0022281855,0.000089159425,0.00050073775,0.013719064,0.98098963,0.000037679496],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2521986,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3188369,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2521986,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012691445,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05000389,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.50146127},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2527246274","doi":"10.7202/1067950ar","title":"GOBERNANZA EN DERECHOS HUMANOS: HACIA UNA EFICACIA Y EFICIENCIA INSTITUCIONAL","year":2020,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Revue québécoise de droit international","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Human rights; Humanities; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.03184959978510107,"score_gpt":0.3281575067089187,"score_spread":0.29630790692381764,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2527246274","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.57169944,0.0019828903,0.0039936216,0.014799527,0.000087373985,0.000057284105,0.00009725712,0.000056296263,0.40722635],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.991731,0.00040959707,0.00043779003,0.0004407501,0.000021808424,0.000021370668,0.00002066019,0.000014933622,0.006902097],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99362826,0.0032839817,0.00013027021,0.0004845878,0.0012693695,0.001203533],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9879475,0.004936975,0.0022397393,0.00095753634,0.0019473151,0.0019707815],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0046092025,0.00024607326,0.00031498642,0.0014563327,0.0051900824,0.00856658,0.0008495653,0.0014429333,0.010939649],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012964246,0.00021215666,0.0002732638,0.0027062846,0.012719995,0.0040911674,0.005504996,0.0015555434,0.0006139173],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015787706,0.00014747004,0.13640635,0.00031369497,0.00008311749,0.00045728486,0.13990967,0.0019798886,0.0012201486,0.6374238,0.008121934,0.07377885],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000044193388,0.00015340063,0.28584433,0.0009931719,0.00011633118,0.00025959447,0.30764586,0.0015183049,0.0014103386,0.13766326,0.26425403,0.00009714395],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0503108,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.100642964,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0503108,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008852231,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009577687,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.100035906},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W25274199","doi":"10.1080/13554794.2014.959974","title":"Derechos fundamentales y ordenanzas locales.","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Neurocase","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Réseau québécois de recherche sur le vieillissement","keywords":"Philosophy; Humanities","score_opus":0.029509137592738138,"score_gpt":0.3554300108121799,"score_spread":0.32592087321944174,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W25274199","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.74879354,0.0065783914,0.0063744416,0.0039773276,0.00050482975,0.000054178126,0.00040654215,0.00016519969,0.23314553],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99113387,0.00076256425,0.0010105514,0.000119035896,0.000102207785,0.000011676599,0.000102915445,0.00001690247,0.0067403386],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99927396,0.00025536653,0.00006153652,0.00011075033,0.00019574106,0.000102619924],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99846834,0.0005925236,0.0003971115,0.00017289024,0.00024284361,0.00012632273],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010151115,0.00019179579,0.00017846262,0.0010136478,0.0012153751,0.0014058937,0.0003234004,0.0005705473,0.005414704],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0043422375,0.000088695684,0.00014545549,0.00075817964,0.0027790067,0.0015092037,0.0012281612,0.0006352557,0.0005679568],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002138285,0.0000756332,0.07700189,0.00050683244,0.00004167209,0.017885063,0.058094554,0.000427953,0.017017268,0.57565445,0.008440926,0.24464004],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000051092524,0.00022488185,0.1318054,0.0002504569,0.00008026301,0.051955137,0.051781043,0.0013724837,0.0088341115,0.18813992,0.5654005,0.00010479627],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025265552,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0041854805,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005414704,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011104754,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00066928857,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01811397},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2528998707","doi":"10.7202/1067940ar","title":"UNE RÉFORME PÉNALE EN AMÉRIQUE LATINE QUI DEVRAIT CHERCHER SA LÉGITIMITÉ","year":2020,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue québécoise de droit international","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.04347782516127516,"score_gpt":0.31983467028290113,"score_spread":0.27635684512162595,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2528998707","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05918367,0.030631524,0.005674512,0.18612047,0.0023945926,0.000060374772,0.00014585671,0.00010428484,0.7156847],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6694887,0.014408983,0.0041921884,0.030789398,0.00174082,0.00017584408,0.000116017094,0.0001087388,0.2789793],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990244,0.00033139644,0.000026510412,0.000106691565,0.00026766193,0.00024328216],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990189,0.00038071675,0.00013476434,0.00008882262,0.0002722943,0.00010454042],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017559907,0.00032873466,0.00014570993,0.0007220828,0.0033682752,0.004430771,0.0007167049,0.0027738952,0.008383628],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00286033,0.0001390411,0.00025357766,0.0010191784,0.0072948593,0.0027786593,0.0018186131,0.0042156437,0.0006795122],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001993281,0.000022440361,0.0013305941,0.00006654803,0.000006057889,0.00011879841,0.008635852,0.00015929688,0.00043695307,0.94270104,0.022969157,0.023533335],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026069181,0.000030230858,0.008152554,0.00035822758,0.000012541563,0.00019026159,0.0066730995,0.00023478558,0.000413597,0.04785601,0.9360269,0.000025652536],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09055969,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1150634,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09055969,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006166808,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0075575877,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18006516},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W25366595","doi":"10.1007/978-3-319-04981-6_5","title":"Decreto-Ley y tipo de gravamen","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Nueva Fiscalidad","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03066839710583526,"score_gpt":0.3766190674830123,"score_spread":0.3459506703771771,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W25366595","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8862271,0.010644251,0.0012568466,0.002086158,0.000304929,0.00007167683,0.0033310202,0.00016015786,0.09591788],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9839333,0.004541864,0.00087155396,0.00019179564,0.00019287068,0.000043696426,0.0009716444,0.000027559567,0.00922579],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994948,0.00008890546,0.000055344077,0.00011197908,0.00014600925,0.000103111575],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99915695,0.00019507842,0.0003399087,0.000076438846,0.00011277338,0.000118855976],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006198133,0.00036647197,0.0005305313,0.0016856543,0.0011814705,0.0011597781,0.0005425742,0.0005839752,0.017296804],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031608155,0.0001657128,0.00044443968,0.0013953601,0.0011692179,0.000739623,0.0008496148,0.000989443,0.001413344],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0023147468,0.0005915949,0.65938747,0.0008212816,0.0002801636,0.0199228,0.0037890014,0.0006713114,0.004226517,0.05482473,0.010163569,0.24300684],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00036569728,0.0010993944,0.7357328,0.0010852461,0.00034718667,0.10688345,0.006211565,0.0014801688,0.0036187225,0.01653822,0.12649632,0.00014128687],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00957204,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009524694,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017296804,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013813286,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007424039,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.057863533},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2548770425","doi":"","title":"La promoción de los derechos humanos y la democracia como condición de la cooperación al desarrollo","year":2002,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Revista Iberoamericana","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; European union; Democracy; Politics; Art; Law; Economics; International trade","score_opus":0.026312755853495604,"score_gpt":0.37094076470829623,"score_spread":0.3446280088548006,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2548770425","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10825851,0.010744869,0.006881653,0.052112184,0.00048711806,0.000067701825,0.00019856702,0.0000679414,0.8211814],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8711347,0.0075080167,0.0019381138,0.0031429648,0.00024096946,0.000071879535,0.00006690989,0.00003416921,0.11586241],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974502,0.0010956208,0.000054229327,0.0003253468,0.0004931037,0.00058152893],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99830484,0.0006038171,0.0003323559,0.00017519822,0.00024586258,0.00033788508],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020863325,0.00027218056,0.00020710914,0.0007843123,0.0045703705,0.00909752,0.0006543891,0.0020169732,0.01026694],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020712998,0.00019030459,0.00023307251,0.0016805002,0.013606839,0.0033137328,0.0038865712,0.0019704471,0.0008448247],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003087861,0.000019085874,0.0037446097,0.00009660713,0.00000654858,0.00014758276,0.01683934,0.00027122785,0.0006295021,0.94833153,0.009568718,0.020314367],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017459108,0.00004698376,0.015049631,0.00036014325,0.000011565591,0.0002368564,0.022799818,0.00037343957,0.0008510708,0.10764363,0.8525807,0.000028843211],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.033336833,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04859129,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.033336833,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0069836974,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0075446414,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06628555},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2566092028","doi":"","title":"El sistema federal en los Estados Unidos de América, México y Canadá: breve análisis comparativo","year":2012,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Documentos de Trabajo. Seminario Permanente de Ciencias Sociales","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.04330668131204524,"score_gpt":0.3731850832586836,"score_spread":0.32987840194663837,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2566092028","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.74804765,0.02922233,0.004782564,0.009908626,0.00017787106,0.00032609713,0.02697672,0.00013404201,0.18042396],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9487666,0.011472522,0.0038759997,0.00079986313,0.000065025684,0.0002004822,0.008504622,0.000075777636,0.026239213],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99678195,0.0004291619,0.000119872806,0.00032470617,0.0014830399,0.00086118205],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.992496,0.0013104939,0.00059503707,0.00025295687,0.0049230107,0.00042263436],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025044791,0.00047056688,0.0007412173,0.012624336,0.0047750613,0.005960179,0.00081992894,0.00053428527,0.007135245],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0068099177,0.0002468153,0.0009897,0.03206504,0.0017054545,0.00187805,0.002031712,0.0013260514,0.00026121523],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00034732567,0.00008182168,0.701631,0.0008645014,0.0010642782,0.00033975684,0.013223782,0.0038553227,0.0005042116,0.14307886,0.02538422,0.10962496],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000147551955,0.00003628593,0.8754402,0.0007545387,0.0004117273,0.00005788005,0.02643919,0.0016560905,0.00031998788,0.0047777332,0.090040065,0.000051552048],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98391366,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9840681,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.044640504,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.044640504,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05093106,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32389104},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2599320263","doi":"","title":"Constituciones Duraderas – Una Crítica Democrática (Enduring Constitutions – A Democratic Critique)","year":2011,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Democracy; Political science; Philosophy; Sociology; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.04342066246304023,"score_gpt":0.33164888925180125,"score_spread":0.28822822678876103,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2599320263","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.032992788,0.008566315,0.047158122,0.17940052,0.00294079,0.00007020807,0.00011636197,0.0002071324,0.7285477],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89064837,0.0024348097,0.0070093162,0.01984573,0.0018784568,0.000202363,0.00006453997,0.00024606625,0.07767039],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98492634,0.0088856695,0.00042523353,0.002105905,0.00241536,0.0012414441],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99081516,0.0056253104,0.00073234463,0.0014742432,0.000993941,0.00035907075],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0122526325,0.00048577916,0.00047662805,0.0012582672,0.009277358,0.009526863,0.0015178625,0.0047999024,0.0075633842],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015885476,0.00037407118,0.00073061057,0.0012168486,0.036294684,0.0082011875,0.0071360897,0.0107890805,0.0010459308],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004101779,0.0000024881251,0.00005870248,0.000012323475,0.0000014976129,0.000008529289,0.0014156902,0.000069158865,0.000025174435,0.9940906,0.002305468,0.0020062076],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024235065,0.000018043494,0.00040687574,0.00013469606,0.000012054892,0.000057059096,0.0013181756,0.00030471577,0.00035910954,0.5970216,0.4003262,0.000017249598],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007582026,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009593984,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0122526325,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0071163764,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0055614742,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06479889},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2610167096","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v33i3.4888","title":"CONSTITUTIONAL CHALLENGES OF THE SOUTH: INDIGENOUS WATER RIGHTS IN CHILE - ANOTHER STEP IN THE “CIVILIZING MISSION?","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Fondo de Financiamiento de Centros de Investigación en Áreas Prioritarias; Comisión Nacional de Investigación Científica y Tecnológica; Centro de Recursos Hídricos para la Agricultura y la Minería; Universidad de Concepción; Fonds National de la Recherche Luxembourg","keywords":"Indigenous; Constitution; Political science; Sovereignty; Argument (complex analysis); Colonialism; Realm; Law; Scholarship; International law; Human rights; Subject (documents); Indigenous rights; Sociology; Law and economics; Political economy; Politics","score_opus":0.10371930265903341,"score_gpt":0.38210742238380613,"score_spread":0.27838811972477273,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2610167096","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14852743,0.012344098,0.0029314156,0.24621569,0.0004431684,0.000060607632,0.00009081725,0.000035038654,0.58935183],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93994397,0.004680604,0.0009740589,0.011365362,0.00034768454,0.00010026855,0.000045815752,0.000029760584,0.042512413],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99826545,0.00084177166,0.00004301674,0.00016560512,0.00033238973,0.00035188333],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99851567,0.0008835401,0.00014753667,0.00014221246,0.00014726173,0.00016387236],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0041978164,0.000260568,0.0002957763,0.00079116505,0.009340188,0.008589355,0.0010094215,0.0024661934,0.004864243],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004953179,0.00019929501,0.00024134206,0.0010927202,0.031289905,0.006081389,0.0086303,0.0059151803,0.00027227192],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008227807,0.0000133255835,0.0005164543,0.000075216674,0.0000034772074,0.00029953715,0.031187674,0.00015213629,0.00028570942,0.958259,0.0034660555,0.005733138],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028180712,0.000023881763,0.0039874064,0.0005978036,0.000014484704,0.0003114174,0.070577435,0.00032526546,0.00082893344,0.46997637,0.45328516,0.000043713873],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.039046515,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.044975523,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.039046515,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013160017,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017289026,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.095483065},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2612632780","doi":"10.18041/0124-0102/advocatus.27.935","title":"La necesidad de repensar el derecho Hiperconsumo y macdonalización de la sociedad","year":2016,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"ADVOCATUS","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Optech (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Derecho; Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.018964856696433573,"score_gpt":0.39237943533326797,"score_spread":0.3734145786368344,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2612632780","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17379801,0.008251942,0.01617177,0.042591177,0.00055751647,0.0000953559,0.000087540895,0.00009218189,0.7583545],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97281545,0.0010887692,0.0014226632,0.0011844757,0.00008628452,0.0000462486,0.000012535749,0.00003109221,0.023312448],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9934285,0.0035934462,0.00019487442,0.0008290092,0.0011604844,0.00079363235],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9922127,0.0031907537,0.001227887,0.0013115399,0.001304263,0.00075276266],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00578211,0.0004255504,0.00043500873,0.001746116,0.009761703,0.011635768,0.0011399682,0.0023359626,0.00826472],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010469131,0.00024161674,0.0002525811,0.0012820306,0.035809405,0.0050415713,0.006623103,0.003218535,0.00044704985],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001676522,0.000011614657,0.0024739364,0.00015004024,0.000007852135,0.00013060347,0.052878868,0.00009922844,0.00036951367,0.92879313,0.0022623285,0.012806029],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025654783,0.00008725925,0.016894097,0.0009889442,0.000069059155,0.00037415398,0.13588962,0.00055522437,0.0014457789,0.1717785,0.6718104,0.000081410304],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06962142,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.17075606,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06962142,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011779897,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013808139,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13843232},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W26139217","doi":"10.1152/japplphysiol.00334.2015","title":"MIR PUIGPELAT, Oriol: Globalización, Estado y Derecho. Las transformaciones recientes del Derecho administrativo.","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revista de Administración Pública","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of British Columbia; Government of Canada","keywords":"Derecho; Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04098672864666459,"score_gpt":0.37174239972651246,"score_spread":0.3307556710798479,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W26139217","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.033804253,0.67685384,0.041634273,0.027789908,0.012878832,0.0004147669,0.0033668384,0.0072193877,0.19603798],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3723573,0.29504392,0.053155452,0.010320476,0.0067646103,0.0013283867,0.0028334928,0.0020171055,0.25617924],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99941456,0.0002191691,0.000033064665,0.00012897159,0.000143048,0.000061128405],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99957055,0.00011528576,0.00010648766,0.00003791272,0.00008841247,0.00008126194],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000839314,0.000800015,0.00062502944,0.0011294924,0.0003234957,0.0018257753,0.0006292036,0.0009877868,0.030219527],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015783416,0.00019982133,0.00039851308,0.0009759217,0.0011136285,0.00080338476,0.00079699454,0.00170597,0.012182036],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011781196,0.00023837852,0.0018111134,0.0016706102,0.00007429981,0.00039732747,0.00021604184,0.0002633333,0.009453442,0.016363278,0.055037,0.913297],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022519633,0.00072457903,0.009050409,0.0007129048,0.00012672791,0.0018942341,0.00025329675,0.0007290067,0.0059017255,0.006405585,0.9739391,0.000037105852],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019096079,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012439241,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030219527,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00077490276,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00090209587,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.101094365},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2616210969","doi":"","title":"Integração: nova ordem federal?","year":2000,"lang":"pt","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.07759148722002214,"score_gpt":0.40910378797107455,"score_spread":0.3315123007510524,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2616210969","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22045812,0.010124682,0.011786144,0.038093332,0.0003721229,0.00004856951,0.00031552248,0.00010768343,0.7186939],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9716589,0.0025075125,0.0013203598,0.0011239413,0.00011276147,0.000018659048,0.00012970525,0.000028266579,0.02309977],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99797803,0.00048422324,0.00006232483,0.00042286146,0.000557731,0.00049480743],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99865913,0.00030663854,0.00020979765,0.00025819018,0.00032121345,0.0002450438],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024470286,0.00019277669,0.00040592463,0.0026665994,0.0046101697,0.010024851,0.0007179162,0.0013105808,0.00908548],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00461036,0.00022620261,0.0003851235,0.004446093,0.01099993,0.006296009,0.0033202542,0.0018548063,0.00041403636],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012455041,0.0000077378045,0.0021218788,0.000028701874,0.000006396526,0.00004132439,0.003777874,0.00015117045,0.00010485401,0.9773787,0.0021081492,0.014260668],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022333452,0.0000456165,0.03469614,0.00045808774,0.000066494336,0.00021887735,0.018103648,0.0009425072,0.00042099564,0.56160176,0.3833957,0.000027971635],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06496512,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10509599,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06496512,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010184231,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008658798,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.129174},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2622318499","doi":"","title":"Una aproximación al debate sobre la gobernanza de Internet (Segunda parte)","year":2011,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Letras Internacionales","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.052979622519094084,"score_gpt":0.35108708613107187,"score_spread":0.29810746361197776,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2622318499","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.057350565,0.045089405,0.0037264815,0.5771859,0.008177863,0.000043642707,0.00056362257,0.00014591422,0.30771658],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.658149,0.042144552,0.0028544683,0.09730554,0.006633235,0.00008447527,0.00048159444,0.00032364065,0.19202344],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99689627,0.0009900252,0.00013602817,0.00048491306,0.0010128765,0.0004799003],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9936686,0.0033065141,0.00058478856,0.00040338462,0.0014304807,0.00060628215],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005468909,0.00029473196,0.0002741364,0.0016003713,0.0035806801,0.016936041,0.0011865959,0.0060536987,0.011694426],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010674484,0.0002848958,0.00033622648,0.0030445796,0.00681056,0.01259349,0.0031874382,0.007563492,0.002039738],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000792455,0.00003985984,0.004225905,0.0004912405,0.000015807589,0.00042849852,0.042487744,0.0002067634,0.00070836424,0.67615587,0.19971542,0.07544527],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000070084434,0.000013406071,0.0048591816,0.0006653943,0.000010694767,0.00020153407,0.012941614,0.00017488506,0.00027365302,0.01458385,0.966243,0.000025810683],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02992931,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03245988,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02992931,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008600576,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005989129,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06240183},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2635700455","doi":"10.21991/c92m3x","title":"Les leçons de Jordan, III : à quelles conditions est-il légitime de déroger aux droits constitutionnels fondamentaux?","year":2017,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.05378333636103678,"score_gpt":0.3759383895990287,"score_spread":0.32215505323799193,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2635700455","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23691915,0.015094933,0.007843406,0.1851175,0.00078065594,0.00009222799,0.00023688986,0.000055314867,0.55385983],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8541178,0.0027971312,0.0018894688,0.012603164,0.0002976073,0.00008829978,0.000068146415,0.00005393823,0.12808448],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99777883,0.0011798883,0.00007243137,0.00024282548,0.00041090875,0.00031507734],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99732274,0.0011817977,0.0003162377,0.00019060819,0.0007612332,0.00022734907],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006893009,0.00026229082,0.00029357232,0.0007671093,0.009360762,0.00943673,0.0010448607,0.0037715018,0.008654935],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0072017377,0.00017523153,0.00018136413,0.001124367,0.015691662,0.0062270677,0.003093719,0.0036772054,0.0010519535],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005506469,0.000017765651,0.0012725425,0.00006374173,0.000005513339,0.00019253221,0.026803227,0.00012573409,0.00027884077,0.9506609,0.0117616,0.008762442],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000061159764,0.00007042374,0.005672609,0.00057582563,0.000014932005,0.00023556278,0.10420236,0.0006518392,0.0023839294,0.25220233,0.63387454,0.000054437416],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03029887,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.045314725,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9697011,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0072458787,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010863687,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.060244977},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W26480920","doi":"10.1038/ijo.2015.217","title":"Aspectos jurídico procesales del nuevo derecho de la competencia desleal","year":2010,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Revista de derecho de la competencia y la distribución","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Institute of General Medical Sciences; National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases; National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; National Institute on Aging; Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Derecho; Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.009876324487322365,"score_gpt":0.338565991365072,"score_spread":0.32868966687774964,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W26480920","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94037706,0.0009622436,0.002117056,0.003685949,0.000056777706,0.00001982507,0.00006536918,0.00001112774,0.05270468],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975079,0.00008427974,0.00015291916,0.00008599833,0.000015372387,0.0000030572967,0.000009745487,0.0000027724566,0.0021378982],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968215,0.0013651049,0.00011261069,0.00043357836,0.00075158215,0.00051551097],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9925438,0.003724819,0.0014624705,0.0005595347,0.00083465496,0.00087482727],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0048522432,0.00012860389,0.00020871186,0.0010492052,0.0025850588,0.0026927025,0.00049067585,0.0007924043,0.005058575],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010417016,0.00014211901,0.00010300838,0.0007297526,0.006502785,0.001070022,0.001948431,0.0013144654,0.00020795644],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00034519774,0.0001784053,0.32219812,0.0001715002,0.000058373804,0.0043256534,0.10439173,0.00031753088,0.011258328,0.47691503,0.0019554342,0.07788475],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000068392976,0.00037173394,0.6440429,0.0002461817,0.00006167263,0.0064363144,0.13189434,0.00077233,0.006033777,0.10563064,0.10433772,0.00010390978],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0051353364,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010484079,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0051353364,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00151485,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002516604,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.025661469},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2737900107","doi":"","title":"LA CONSTITUCIONALIDAD Y LA DEMOCRACIA","year":2015,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"PUEBLO CONTINENTE","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Optech (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionality; Humanities; Political science; Democracy; Ideal (ethics); Law; Philosophy; Politics; Supreme court","score_opus":0.04912911007447443,"score_gpt":0.37685578024839494,"score_spread":0.32772667017392054,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2737900107","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018203447,0.016437199,0.003066701,0.019000415,0.0003170393,0.00001810553,0.00015971319,0.000042521817,0.9427548],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8784902,0.017101793,0.0018245012,0.0021404757,0.0009056138,0.00008966243,0.00022165755,0.00004288758,0.099183135],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985373,0.0007024189,0.000048048518,0.00021125568,0.0002756203,0.00022535927],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986389,0.00074004213,0.00018729443,0.00012637685,0.00016958347,0.00013773395],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016584819,0.00028799183,0.0002458603,0.0011577521,0.0029780609,0.008675814,0.00037416906,0.0011011962,0.020032065],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021368617,0.00015669015,0.00022935402,0.0018630417,0.0123711005,0.00325159,0.0025268183,0.0025245682,0.0014432033],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000392443,0.0000053396016,0.0002967345,0.000022938037,0.0000014702275,0.000013360398,0.0006119456,0.00011298447,0.00002864273,0.9896857,0.0034563108,0.005760658],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009758244,0.000012056076,0.0024729762,0.00030690513,0.0000054803345,0.0000615357,0.0021785188,0.00027737807,0.00011195327,0.5665174,0.42803553,0.0000104899755],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008348386,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00830434,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020032065,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0058496445,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035150708,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06701398},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2739139083","doi":"10.25247/p1982-999x.2011.v1n2.p%p","title":"Nótulas para uma filosofia jurídico-processual em Tomás de Aquino [Nótulas for a legal and procedural philosophy in Aquinate]","year":2012,"lang":"pt","type":"article","venue":"Americanae (AECID Library)","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Discovery Air (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Humanities","score_opus":0.046311679587044206,"score_gpt":0.3421903788281695,"score_spread":0.2958786992411253,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2739139083","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.042369306,0.0094998935,0.024958117,0.035509862,0.0006168181,0.00005271511,0.00008761724,0.000085251646,0.8868203],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8797133,0.002481513,0.0037269155,0.0025557398,0.00035878483,0.00008734733,0.000037528625,0.00006097629,0.1109779],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99670404,0.00169839,0.00010957158,0.0005505285,0.00061363843,0.00032376402],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985952,0.00062925875,0.00014865278,0.0002288435,0.00026147586,0.00013648029],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029473733,0.0002983021,0.00028835094,0.00089203444,0.010221107,0.010579529,0.00093030895,0.0034482353,0.008139617],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004925539,0.0002369163,0.00032360767,0.0010014805,0.034449138,0.008437465,0.0035706752,0.0052448763,0.0008434207],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000016229627,0.0000015969053,0.000036806454,0.000006437898,3.069654e-7,0.000012301992,0.0021514734,0.000019545543,0.000029653784,0.9960593,0.000816939,0.00086412195],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009056765,0.000020180345,0.0010949003,0.0001584556,0.000007906906,0.00011924853,0.010772308,0.0003697392,0.00030927177,0.7234225,0.26369417,0.000022185046],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009723213,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01877628,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010579529,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0064419587,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005524052,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.046739936},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2757225934","doi":"10.20318/eunomia.2017.3804","title":"La incidencia democrática de la nebulosa obligación de claridad del Dictamen relativo a la secesión del Quebec = Democratic Impact of the vague Obligation of Clarity in the Reference re Secession of Quebec","year":2017,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"EUNOMÍA Revista en Cultura de la Legalidad","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Tribunal; Obligation; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.023101448022894395,"score_gpt":0.3872741607202332,"score_spread":0.3641727126973388,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2757225934","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6847,0.0014780416,0.0016853489,0.011686591,0.000072758696,0.00006901372,0.000427022,0.00002878539,0.29985243],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9953259,0.00013644769,0.00008912288,0.00021914412,0.00001192775,0.0000075482567,0.000027882286,0.0000029909718,0.0041788863],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9918893,0.0023539702,0.00018017473,0.00069660775,0.0025193254,0.0023607034],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98338103,0.0058484534,0.004063284,0.00095098675,0.0043025347,0.0014538286],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006295958,0.0001356317,0.0003046046,0.0012247354,0.005664585,0.006732676,0.00056687056,0.00077642465,0.016408756],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019426646,0.00017774869,0.0002731018,0.002021526,0.008721449,0.0018761863,0.0039052295,0.002134824,0.00033695216],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002996251,0.000065931235,0.28101087,0.00023777645,0.00013869656,0.00086168066,0.0788002,0.0025968878,0.00139464,0.54852134,0.013010838,0.073061466],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004743899,0.00011035798,0.6659252,0.00046204924,0.00013380125,0.0004143059,0.0925858,0.003200189,0.0012386034,0.03546894,0.20030056,0.00011276751],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.65492505,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.75119376,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.34507495,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02221728,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016859554,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.69421434},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2758821449","doi":"10.14198/doxa2017.40.08","title":"La filosofía del derecho de Alexandre Kojève","year":2017,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"DOXA Cuadernos de Filosofía del Derecho","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Optech (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Derecho","score_opus":0.06038519638070435,"score_gpt":0.3850644373788855,"score_spread":0.3246792409981812,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2758821449","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.190065,0.0056970087,0.012957313,0.031557158,0.0006446583,0.000038717695,0.000068438196,0.00004645033,0.75892526],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96200204,0.001778432,0.0007215579,0.0013156432,0.000108684595,0.000024372812,0.000021807182,0.000038131875,0.033989295],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99745244,0.0013168524,0.00008184359,0.0002810409,0.0004967027,0.00037117038],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981177,0.001127347,0.0001946643,0.00021221711,0.00022923219,0.000118837015],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002280094,0.0003594538,0.00033069015,0.0015116207,0.0072946725,0.008396918,0.0007371289,0.0025828788,0.004696943],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0037490842,0.00023475457,0.0002640024,0.0013709625,0.027541267,0.0065598576,0.004537038,0.0035219355,0.00068466057],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009439617,0.0000044741323,0.00058229885,0.0000312946,0.0000017946512,0.00019382243,0.053557333,0.000054029544,0.00021336495,0.9382417,0.0020910196,0.0050194333],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008515073,0.000025455278,0.00523504,0.00058008643,0.000017047965,0.0009013322,0.11198703,0.00040244867,0.0010045086,0.3456404,0.53413355,0.000064602915],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0073017376,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01309815,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008396918,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00576585,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035848015,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.041834414},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2762486503","doi":"","title":"Entrevista al doctor Pere Vilanova","year":2017,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Perspectiva escolar","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Montenegro; Political science; History; Art; Ancient history","score_opus":0.0437321673461142,"score_gpt":0.4151310212250356,"score_spread":0.3713988538789214,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2762486503","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008386856,0.053299934,0.000664118,0.6310906,0.11534738,0.000101630976,0.00084450486,0.0002522854,0.19001281],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.04087148,0.0102568725,0.00028499152,0.06270462,0.010000252,0.000047684578,0.00024516127,0.00018974247,0.8753993],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973194,0.00051998923,0.0000811087,0.0005525803,0.0008715385,0.00065532443],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995605,0.0004151116,0.00016395129,0.00009654445,0.00090343476,0.0028160422],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014636089,0.0005245516,0.00064236217,0.00081460027,0.004168065,0.0039128065,0.00086389756,0.0029153135,0.10599751],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006217797,0.00033669078,0.0003504969,0.0005410015,0.0014471516,0.0017711442,0.0036682351,0.005378246,0.034125064],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000054064243,0.000038387523,0.00078365306,0.00013280708,0.000004810635,0.00018099093,0.00077817,0.00006206949,0.00025044702,0.010803825,0.96290016,0.024010642],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000045274724,0.000016210814,0.00083462644,0.00009768562,0.0000015858647,0.000115903684,0.0004681372,0.000022002596,0.00009994896,0.00043337152,0.9979012,0.000004765084],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01378375,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022396661,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10599751,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0059978445,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010679264,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35459697},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2779743566","doi":"10.4000/books.editionsmsh.10699","title":"Les particularités du constitutionnalisme uruguayen et ses faiblesses institutionnelles","year":2015,"lang":"fr","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Éditions de la Maison des sciences de l’homme eBooks","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec en Outaouais","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Constitution; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.24657069630047226,"score_gpt":0.42674343825713196,"score_spread":0.1801727419566597,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2779743566","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10605389,0.09016843,0.0053733066,0.012626349,0.0005889287,0.000052823383,0.00013024967,0.00006792049,0.78493816],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.80863863,0.01559857,0.002408952,0.0010083872,0.00023664074,0.00011798486,0.00009097187,0.000076072356,0.17182375],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982912,0.001052453,0.000040084047,0.00022561097,0.0001471451,0.00024348969],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995455,0.00020344416,0.00006535334,0.00005447328,0.00008876754,0.000042513948],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015838004,0.00036740248,0.00033684744,0.00080033945,0.005368335,0.0041356236,0.00054092985,0.0010159754,0.0050979317],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016599614,0.00031716115,0.00023853217,0.0011713074,0.009057558,0.0022574605,0.0017731576,0.002393354,0.00039899148],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002816569,0.000010341025,0.000858192,0.0001302715,0.000005274069,0.000119813085,0.05003742,0.00015702371,0.00059792167,0.928316,0.004130204,0.015609318],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012510408,0.00005739534,0.015266588,0.00068860326,0.00001808717,0.00023861419,0.016831413,0.0003909223,0.00066343346,0.055647742,0.9101522,0.000032443775],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.129612,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.20259555,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.129612,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011772916,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004330279,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25771517},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2791516439","doi":"","title":"The Quantitative Tactics Used to Delegitimize a Right to the City Social Justice Movement in Bogotá, Colombia","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alternate routes","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Movement (music); Social justice; Political science; Sociology; Law; Law and economics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.07993507558470733,"score_gpt":0.40827134965901696,"score_spread":0.32833627407430965,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2791516439","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.65568274,0.00090251473,0.007993222,0.0047772974,0.00012219077,0.00032171255,0.00019937292,0.00003376411,0.32996714],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99207336,0.00009561497,0.0011625353,0.00017049567,0.000005466679,0.00009883024,0.000020265028,0.000010244208,0.0063633136],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99421024,0.0031609056,0.00021801532,0.00052664476,0.00058182183,0.0013024245],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9957787,0.0023756514,0.0005095948,0.00040120652,0.0006113376,0.00032356646],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0046330392,0.00029508848,0.00032872244,0.003048239,0.010998685,0.008263872,0.0009580239,0.0016831157,0.0060688583],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011774192,0.00026537295,0.00019914837,0.0024749222,0.014073369,0.0029093428,0.0041619395,0.0023550359,0.00020143893],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007484196,0.000059531663,0.013848143,0.00018130137,0.000020334719,0.00023914303,0.05688948,0.00044796386,0.001030226,0.896601,0.0021756764,0.028432397],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010766823,0.00018293668,0.1251872,0.0009033686,0.00016525194,0.00030666383,0.49132666,0.0031561754,0.004509309,0.15536779,0.2186294,0.00015759018],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12401673,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.31501293,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12401673,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014696396,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010591,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24658972},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2794104303","doi":"10.7202/1043464ar","title":"REVUE DE LA JURISPRUDENCE 2015 EN DROIT MUNICIPAL","year":2016,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue du notariat","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ministry of Labour, Employment and Social Solidarity","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Political science; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.020401463457100893,"score_gpt":0.3349545461673124,"score_spread":0.31455308271021154,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2794104303","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08792644,0.06806632,0.008209945,0.09622415,0.004282063,0.00012863125,0.00048246497,0.00013917442,0.7345409],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8096589,0.008975457,0.0034424644,0.010630363,0.0010694015,0.0002202493,0.00018396079,0.00015406308,0.16566509],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97857624,0.008499877,0.0011578139,0.0021910234,0.006146899,0.0034281642],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99375314,0.003965205,0.00036745128,0.00058655674,0.0009189902,0.0004085382],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017163528,0.0006347885,0.0016217275,0.0033462737,0.014547577,0.01861416,0.002533795,0.0113980435,0.008757988],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021829233,0.0008867461,0.0016248077,0.0040698517,0.017358413,0.007040829,0.006802752,0.013549881,0.0010601423],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010723758,0.000011969835,0.0001496002,0.000036763722,0.00000873389,0.00006208463,0.0029206297,0.00013835334,0.00008779634,0.9884304,0.0049992157,0.0031436267],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004619576,0.00003868726,0.004052966,0.0009191494,0.000039321425,0.0001929087,0.00441381,0.00044590535,0.00058907125,0.10672035,0.8824664,0.00007521359],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3117987,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.23582435,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3117987,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05796189,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.050927833,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.61996764},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2821155027","doi":"10.5380/pr_eleitoral.v3i3.42805","title":"Las sentencias judiciales comos actos correctores del sistema democrático","year":2014,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Paraná Eleitoral revista brasileira de direito eleitoral e ciência política","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Encana (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.029954846405558656,"score_gpt":0.34723276643516693,"score_spread":0.31727792002960825,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2821155027","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03128916,0.0046416405,0.023853244,0.041384082,0.00095226895,0.00006765586,0.00010970272,0.000118485215,0.8975838],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.84163797,0.002672249,0.0047226013,0.0047331047,0.0005911071,0.00009844107,0.0000742611,0.00010150569,0.14536877],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9888009,0.005978221,0.00038228696,0.0013918849,0.0024107445,0.0010359919],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9957326,0.0018418733,0.0004648889,0.0006420568,0.0009989615,0.0003196567],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0050243214,0.00047226634,0.00040590353,0.0009508006,0.0069660707,0.010664312,0.0007937427,0.0031651077,0.00905117],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010129073,0.0003706542,0.000543921,0.0012227311,0.019071668,0.0044612056,0.003262397,0.0061304346,0.0014844588],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000061606993,0.000004121018,0.00020029668,0.000018525077,0.0000030837166,0.000025269444,0.0020982905,0.000088112596,0.00009823672,0.9906598,0.004157194,0.0026408434],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000032004235,0.000036634643,0.0023268815,0.00022010303,0.000030386514,0.0001329964,0.0045526666,0.00097123,0.00080050854,0.49576753,0.4950919,0.00003714302],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012451177,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020237522,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012451177,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0066526234,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008077336,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.048268378},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2885365491","doi":"10.18542/hendu.v7i1.6012","title":"Importação, Exportação e Consenso Regional na Corte Interamericana de Direitos Humanos","year":2018,"lang":"pt","type":"article","venue":"Hendu – Revista Latino-Americana de Direitos Humanos","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Intertek (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Human rights; Political science; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.09056744566287066,"score_gpt":0.3890171782875237,"score_spread":0.298449732624653,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2885365491","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.40944254,0.011863735,0.0076579694,0.020116957,0.00015105912,0.000021023738,0.00017595524,0.000051973744,0.55051875],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99125403,0.0014509087,0.0007112607,0.00055209774,0.00003428492,0.000010103396,0.000021241674,0.000013180127,0.005952829],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985049,0.0007237311,0.000039983497,0.00030226685,0.00020764234,0.00022159639],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981831,0.0008822212,0.0002775225,0.00027719158,0.0002502415,0.00012970652],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023142179,0.00015977415,0.00023334021,0.0013815049,0.0036562488,0.0058485717,0.0004997791,0.0008008532,0.0042669075],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026424332,0.00012512138,0.00022929325,0.0025890023,0.01400287,0.002333104,0.002694223,0.0017950399,0.00014940013],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020442712,0.000008986232,0.0070802863,0.00005937399,0.000010907023,0.00011039439,0.0193384,0.00019188398,0.00045287778,0.96005857,0.0012622925,0.011405511],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030777017,0.00007970414,0.092972964,0.0006990202,0.00009944128,0.0006150961,0.10470067,0.0010437455,0.0013195904,0.35626158,0.4421093,0.00006805498],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.028646346,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.057603102,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028646346,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003935166,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031816638,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05695921},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2886761854","doi":"","title":"Régimen Jurídico de la Tecnología","year":2001,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Revista de derecho y ciencias penales: Ciencias Sociales y Políticas","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Optech (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.05794881691201879,"score_gpt":0.39635961701410205,"score_spread":0.33841080010208324,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2886761854","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0109429965,0.01315146,0.021666164,0.12587234,0.01104151,0.00011658094,0.0002381794,0.00026806621,0.81670266],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.40932417,0.009019216,0.014064683,0.029308977,0.01214836,0.0004885749,0.00025710132,0.0005603425,0.5248285],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9843575,0.006524964,0.00061854813,0.0018923972,0.005411872,0.0011946439],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9919802,0.0033047071,0.0005279902,0.0018946106,0.0018655148,0.0004269359],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013853143,0.0006734189,0.0012241831,0.0031716754,0.008999694,0.016198274,0.0020762437,0.009249122,0.019758718],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022380766,0.0007972931,0.00087225,0.0019763017,0.026220009,0.007829545,0.0059486465,0.016615383,0.0038672283],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009608286,0.000009148604,0.000060724677,0.000021053902,0.0000033408794,0.00001265632,0.00057616114,0.00005146475,0.000068057656,0.985252,0.009792254,0.0041435068],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003905751,0.000027957874,0.00036487237,0.00022393715,0.000016721817,0.000110282344,0.00092759373,0.0003398366,0.0003684405,0.31795642,0.6796024,0.000022452812],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008113304,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007273805,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019758718,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009211763,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0108406935,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07326335},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2891085224","doi":"10.7202/1067015ar","title":"Entre théories et pratiques : la nature, sujet de droit dans la constitution équatorienne, considérations critiques sur une vieille antienne","year":2020,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue québécoise de droit international","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.01619906769008311,"score_gpt":0.3133602146104657,"score_spread":0.2971611469203826,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2891085224","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1512213,0.018341377,0.016120108,0.09274894,0.0010595524,0.000047780675,0.00011016666,0.0000346795,0.72031605],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9594857,0.0035071278,0.0015282542,0.0027339717,0.00020259977,0.000042783355,0.000023190205,0.000030334817,0.032446023],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99725085,0.0014352844,0.000068082314,0.00036603137,0.0005005502,0.00037920865],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99768746,0.0014551969,0.00023963168,0.00015671203,0.00031369785,0.00014718252],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037390348,0.00027533266,0.00028883407,0.0011421188,0.008101788,0.0069221966,0.00089016696,0.0024166922,0.0052728886],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0041777147,0.00021706766,0.00027789472,0.0014176746,0.040147953,0.004976368,0.003115977,0.007221152,0.0003606327],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005679196,0.0000035989274,0.00025778916,0.000015801912,0.0000012481619,0.000036189635,0.018225886,0.0000455878,0.00006231487,0.97875434,0.0006884902,0.0019031226],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025826479,0.000043972643,0.004488239,0.0006199404,0.000014863394,0.00019820797,0.054385237,0.000380206,0.00050392456,0.5078632,0.43144065,0.00003578126],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.046237122,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06359703,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.046237122,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012082729,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008674735,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09193593},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2897141440","doi":"","title":"El derecho a la vida en el caso Nadege Dorzema et al V República Dominicana","year":2013,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Revue québécoise de droit international","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Derecho; Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02116809678202996,"score_gpt":0.35879775572608347,"score_spread":0.3376296589440535,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2897141440","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.45587876,0.015044092,0.0007429481,0.09057245,0.000655001,0.000056126624,0.00016601279,0.000033740187,0.43685088],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94173276,0.0019564563,0.00019362998,0.004161726,0.00008356746,0.000030521664,0.000029051354,0.000017601491,0.05179473],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998847,0.00035430535,0.000025430265,0.00008918086,0.00014115663,0.0005428555],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993637,0.00028069946,0.00007496231,0.000044342596,0.00013169537,0.00010465252],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016261046,0.00020942611,0.00030437933,0.0010161027,0.010531401,0.006242714,0.0007851839,0.0024091674,0.0046168393],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030867222,0.00018159792,0.00014604726,0.0013345585,0.008488646,0.0016331698,0.003448858,0.00421525,0.00019174423],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007336916,0.000024174422,0.004929217,0.00009054751,0.0000104172495,0.0009105708,0.10038926,0.0000908545,0.00095063495,0.85261,0.019903976,0.020017043],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000033912074,0.0000235783,0.012386872,0.00041224336,0.000033644414,0.00045309035,0.10852801,0.00012045001,0.00084845506,0.033732463,0.8433962,0.000031032014],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.23881215,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.43933922,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23881215,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016203677,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015748909,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47484422},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2898901904","doi":"","title":"Justicia constitucional y derechos fundamentales del pueblo y el Estado de Quebec: a propósito del \"Asunto Henderson\"","year":2018,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Sistema: revista de ciencias sociales","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; State (computer science); Derecho; Tribunal; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.07759916354918436,"score_gpt":0.3751698489931104,"score_spread":0.29757068544392606,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2898901904","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14839898,0.019375226,0.005229071,0.22053762,0.0017752842,0.00012330677,0.000646852,0.000089651316,0.6038241],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8106088,0.0071995785,0.001065311,0.022846472,0.00033184912,0.000086564294,0.0001576968,0.000065259206,0.15763848],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982609,0.00041802134,0.00003285128,0.00021804747,0.00042741565,0.00064266793],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99728656,0.00055215537,0.00014801239,0.00010571403,0.0012352912,0.00067225384],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015301292,0.0003313898,0.00028951067,0.0013375399,0.018497696,0.011198092,0.0017016213,0.0027993252,0.010476242],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030847243,0.0002630133,0.00023546022,0.001630031,0.012729849,0.0038558417,0.003147677,0.0043599075,0.00046144726],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000310271,0.000036684098,0.013236526,0.00023877161,0.000026576115,0.00075042096,0.1531903,0.0003285685,0.0004290747,0.60840774,0.18783756,0.035486735],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006001819,0.000012613263,0.02065687,0.0006201799,0.00002949481,0.00012849135,0.11042801,0.0004395173,0.00025149997,0.0112571325,0.8561085,0.0000617346],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98162246,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99370956,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.065664634,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.065664634,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07433039,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4764325},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2907736897","doi":"","title":"El derecho a la identidad cultural de los pueblos indígenas de América. Estudio de derecho comparado: Canadá y México","year":2008,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Dialnet (Universidad de la Rioja)","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Derecho; Context (archaeology); Identity (music); Cartography; Political science; Sociology; Philosophy; Geography","score_opus":0.03026477074690407,"score_gpt":0.34356631476669375,"score_spread":0.31330154401978966,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2907736897","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9205274,0.003688583,0.00037461836,0.008450992,0.00007172232,0.000037796955,0.0002590749,0.000005966276,0.06658372],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9895788,0.0022464206,0.0001863806,0.000565814,0.000017779057,0.00003056784,0.00008953049,0.000010130588,0.007274545],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980854,0.0006206114,0.000048164926,0.00020937179,0.00039682895,0.0006396252],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99688303,0.00090363744,0.0004991911,0.00012360184,0.0011347022,0.00045583746],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024653277,0.00022754529,0.00032841606,0.0027369212,0.014705051,0.0078113526,0.0009820089,0.0010165888,0.004228268],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005505842,0.00025105797,0.00020328659,0.0057711476,0.0089682145,0.004445711,0.00424366,0.002057163,0.0001514931],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007560907,0.00004371521,0.10888122,0.00012819216,0.000021627826,0.00050281,0.80866295,0.000057038927,0.00033190034,0.050205,0.0048583504,0.02623153],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000051444918,0.000013218884,0.101069935,0.00022898188,0.000019283925,0.00007618632,0.8604143,0.000056032444,0.00013413951,0.0012890227,0.036678713,0.000014999942],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9017104,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9299998,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09828961,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.035095274,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.034236833,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2546352},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2908946625","doi":"","title":"Derecho Internacional Público","year":2016,"lang":"pt","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Bourgeoisie; Decolonization; Politics; China; Quarter (Canadian coin); Cultural revolution; Political science; Economic history; Political economy; History; Development economics; Economy; Law; Sociology; Economics","score_opus":0.09008762961630809,"score_gpt":0.3883331898214233,"score_spread":0.29824556020511517,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2908946625","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0011179155,0.039013322,0.0007911394,0.01504888,0.038298413,0.00003594133,0.0009882741,0.00055302714,0.9041531],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.01170707,0.026458604,0.0004611186,0.0025495677,0.011119006,0.00008671263,0.0009582898,0.00043641805,0.94622314],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986125,0.00033111894,0.00005255301,0.00020762531,0.00060408737,0.00019213579],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99847645,0.00035703514,0.0001295458,0.00022664708,0.00064724125,0.0001630668],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016436012,0.00095755345,0.00077887566,0.002382687,0.0020445192,0.0090372125,0.0011421122,0.0024814869,0.18003465],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029363781,0.00036500877,0.00044527464,0.003209104,0.0017045154,0.0037941476,0.002510434,0.0040671816,0.09119377],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000068689944,0.000040487128,0.00017874136,0.00025378916,0.0000056254758,0.00013725374,0.00044616396,0.00009484485,0.00021655756,0.060957763,0.8568691,0.080730855],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002749966,0.000002658228,0.00006472832,0.00007062046,0.0000010119405,0.00003645092,0.0000687042,0.000013019903,0.00001942537,0.0005828117,0.99913615,0.0000017042847],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009214949,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0084874295,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18003465,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0048815543,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0046021785,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6022759},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W29106938","doi":"10.1016/j.marpolbul.2017.10.014","title":"La Justicia, bajo el dominio de un poder político desmedido y sordo","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Diario La Ley","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.025139774980834678,"score_gpt":0.3833726440211082,"score_spread":0.3582328690402735,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W29106938","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92420036,0.00040890285,0.00025025423,0.0036774362,0.000034189277,0.000013330895,0.00002822433,0.0000065191666,0.071380824],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99158293,0.00022627291,0.00006823021,0.00023818818,0.000013595667,0.0000034394018,0.000010926624,0.0000013624748,0.007854983],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993262,0.00016953907,0.000024163013,0.00008587692,0.00020479257,0.00018942873],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988164,0.00032479566,0.00038090392,0.00008554815,0.0001683418,0.00022408733],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009465083,0.00007339993,0.00007746442,0.00032280528,0.0027123904,0.0019773007,0.00019120438,0.0005303887,0.0020933663],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022195503,0.0000738487,0.00003737649,0.00029678672,0.0046025347,0.0008273121,0.0013883858,0.00085265964,0.000100441524],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002581923,0.00018229426,0.32623112,0.0001686157,0.00002148606,0.0016660971,0.10610404,0.00042957938,0.0073346524,0.4333744,0.009187774,0.1150417],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000045670247,0.0002493914,0.43223336,0.00020536358,0.000027595253,0.00078525173,0.096283264,0.0003272606,0.0018591933,0.013313597,0.45462713,0.00004280906],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03437601,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11700236,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03437601,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029612374,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034151769,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.068351865},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2913200168","doi":"10.7202/1055495ar","title":"Límites en el ejercicio del control de convencionalidad y aplicación de estándares internacionales por tribunales estatales: El caso peruano","year":2019,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Tribunal; Political science; Art; Law","score_opus":0.014206607929560296,"score_gpt":0.3194315187021496,"score_spread":0.3052249107725893,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2913200168","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.936793,0.00095815986,0.0015250582,0.00544597,0.00002492088,0.000055758803,0.00006283921,0.000027006945,0.05510723],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99190193,0.00043619628,0.0004392999,0.00031255255,0.000012634065,0.00004346575,0.000024516452,0.000007930693,0.0068214],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.998187,0.0008980563,0.000044804045,0.00018008483,0.0002839261,0.00040605778],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960211,0.0012911755,0.0009124525,0.00024756146,0.0009571553,0.0005706145],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022366566,0.00018295337,0.00015427214,0.00059113733,0.0032820783,0.0031872885,0.000689791,0.0008365661,0.0075743734],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00601382,0.00018671383,0.00013148162,0.0010431022,0.003306837,0.0013660339,0.003859664,0.000965272,0.0003664706],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026041933,0.00028019818,0.23661286,0.0005441785,0.00008290292,0.0024909093,0.55629265,0.00072413555,0.010117623,0.06810267,0.006388749,0.11810265],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000036582187,0.00038895084,0.4280009,0.0005773288,0.000069591144,0.00042982658,0.37347317,0.00057643396,0.001799911,0.010482792,0.18409812,0.00006643398],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03741517,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09002455,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03741517,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002603225,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005504492,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07439476},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2913908320","doi":"10.7202/1055494ar","title":"La jurisprudencia de la Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos como fuente de derecho. Una revisión de la doctrina del “control de convencionalidad”","year":2019,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.01073277403643461,"score_gpt":0.3271572615737502,"score_spread":0.31642448753731556,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2913908320","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.029185276,0.007975298,0.016168164,0.048648324,0.001166016,0.00003883589,0.000073015966,0.000065849854,0.8966793],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8360392,0.0030201173,0.004137932,0.015925778,0.00086380803,0.00010318329,0.000057239595,0.00006543291,0.13978747],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9939733,0.00236654,0.00016244846,0.0012224056,0.0016415915,0.0006337718],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973762,0.00095992256,0.0002766038,0.00042393472,0.0006710267,0.000292331],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00362314,0.00036544347,0.00028074606,0.0007102946,0.0067042094,0.009202655,0.00081495824,0.0038379834,0.0058427295],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004707349,0.00027526967,0.00042490524,0.0008430089,0.026069716,0.0038231504,0.0046188054,0.007211754,0.0009544712],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003865025,0.000003501473,0.00018952294,0.000012842213,0.0000020309528,0.000021044552,0.0028705725,0.000038495662,0.0001273193,0.9915394,0.003116121,0.0020751609],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015674685,0.00003352327,0.0027267644,0.0002233485,0.000016351343,0.0002099673,0.007878744,0.00037165065,0.0006070382,0.4509407,0.5369413,0.000034988676],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02054075,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.027412068,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02054075,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0054999865,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00950731,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.040842354},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2914727888","doi":"10.7202/1055492ar","title":"Mexico’s Relationship with the Inter-American Court of Human Rights: Success or Failure?","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Government (linguistics); Political science; Order (exchange); Relation (database); Law; Fundamental rights; Business; Computer science","score_opus":0.025649938168111317,"score_gpt":0.31765943650283723,"score_spread":0.2920094983347259,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2914727888","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.40474436,0.011594497,0.0014457691,0.13514335,0.00024734568,0.00003748523,0.00010364802,0.00003796274,0.44664553],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98707473,0.0018859688,0.00049103965,0.003724191,0.0001358498,0.000024199222,0.000025894966,0.000010312514,0.006627853],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968912,0.0011272305,0.00005013046,0.0003194109,0.00047144035,0.001140574],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99679416,0.0016508459,0.00053215626,0.00022609632,0.0005093835,0.00028736604],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0059462385,0.00016739829,0.0003769482,0.0013609618,0.010327383,0.009856537,0.0010377958,0.0031127112,0.005676041],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008357486,0.00023084763,0.00027115748,0.0021945743,0.010401818,0.0038218973,0.0036783637,0.0044278167,0.00018145304],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000059029477,0.000036129004,0.0095475,0.000052120016,0.000030221214,0.00033089917,0.009300627,0.00016039527,0.00021508562,0.95208323,0.007307017,0.020877887],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017771129,0.000246831,0.15921675,0.0015720499,0.00024980848,0.0006866989,0.061233997,0.001482607,0.0015465062,0.15567659,0.6177448,0.00016567389],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.14203252,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.19552223,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14203252,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0142109655,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009109831,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28241158},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2914986013","doi":"","title":"Escrito de amicus curiae presentado ante la corte interamericana de derechos humanos","year":2013,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Revue québécoise de droit international","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.018249590113881286,"score_gpt":0.32686944853060623,"score_spread":0.30861985841672496,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2914986013","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.028545998,0.13535558,0.0048746048,0.3720983,0.021888185,0.000059620274,0.0005197473,0.00014168804,0.43651634],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.48424783,0.05189824,0.0031751746,0.09332127,0.015852181,0.00019061253,0.00043019865,0.00039821755,0.3504862],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970241,0.001181041,0.00006936573,0.00046646243,0.0007829687,0.00047591215],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995327,0.0024619813,0.00030662463,0.0004748733,0.0011009118,0.00032872093],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003828535,0.00054092985,0.00060059904,0.0038157445,0.0129460385,0.008617132,0.0009539588,0.0051414766,0.011375151],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009155272,0.00030536522,0.00042981483,0.0053499937,0.010793469,0.0050542573,0.0039738985,0.0068084924,0.0011792397],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028978266,0.000021088592,0.0008759567,0.000113473325,0.000009984267,0.00024066157,0.01949676,0.00005640221,0.0004032182,0.7036273,0.24905115,0.026075052],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000032427033,0.0000031600641,0.0016284056,0.00023726818,0.0000069971156,0.000088917805,0.0053031994,0.000045876193,0.00016231116,0.0173204,0.9751892,0.00001104614],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1407467,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.24472588,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8592533,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009686074,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011914701,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27985495},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2915033244","doi":"10.7202/1055488ar","title":"L’accord de paix en Colombie à la lumière du droit international interaméricain","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Art","score_opus":0.014759708509637787,"score_gpt":0.2877000523076343,"score_spread":0.2729403437979965,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2915033244","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13505404,0.006901298,0.0022914677,0.025501054,0.0011444562,0.00012898323,0.00027834694,0.00010008017,0.82860035],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7506853,0.0026006375,0.0025577801,0.007289433,0.00033703086,0.00013821624,0.0001966554,0.00007837899,0.2361165],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99845254,0.00027750342,0.000048805032,0.00026401473,0.0004976058,0.00045942256],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992168,0.0002110276,0.00008973609,0.00008262209,0.00018213085,0.00021770786],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014600841,0.00034270683,0.00019449706,0.0006100066,0.0057009775,0.00421597,0.0006067586,0.0020662271,0.012005201],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025836774,0.00021108604,0.00021386796,0.0010752728,0.004635235,0.0014536142,0.003719775,0.003969805,0.0008112067],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008131559,0.000021263682,0.005002822,0.00020598159,0.000011212634,0.0007396169,0.03499317,0.00019784796,0.0021036686,0.90100926,0.025592249,0.030041572],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019416653,0.000035859233,0.019091127,0.0002854911,0.000009555548,0.00024455425,0.005528724,0.00013681289,0.0005848712,0.011763915,0.9622623,0.000037363203],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.15958218,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.22391963,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15958218,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008139409,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013386015,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31730664},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W293941256","doi":"","title":"Política judicial en la Venezuela post-Chávez","year":2014,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Revista \"Cuadernos Manuel Giménez Abad\"","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Presidential system; Sanctions; Opposition (politics); Political science; Politics; Law; Supreme court; Constitutional court; Quarter (Canadian coin); Constitution; History","score_opus":0.014534981523918017,"score_gpt":0.33261201556002895,"score_spread":0.31807703403611093,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W293941256","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.44071946,0.055365875,0.0027019202,0.075287394,0.0030241276,0.00011857542,0.0004126981,0.00012300708,0.42224708],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96347183,0.0053020692,0.00065933296,0.002128916,0.0005753012,0.00006061768,0.00009402862,0.000021756412,0.027686248],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988349,0.00036283143,0.00003107666,0.00016582145,0.000185789,0.0004195845],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991353,0.0004941121,0.000111751935,0.000048049336,0.00014294952,0.000067872956],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024214275,0.00025629412,0.00039014593,0.0011375324,0.0077156276,0.0062136645,0.0006336572,0.002498271,0.006031249],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0038312657,0.00024960755,0.00025883477,0.0011138725,0.006960723,0.0019407156,0.002103464,0.004674877,0.00029869654],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000107565196,0.00007249346,0.0032813654,0.00022715874,0.0000113312135,0.0009379346,0.021452973,0.00039190246,0.0014459655,0.9357379,0.010993573,0.025339857],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013782941,0.00013409212,0.043668296,0.0012282698,0.0000698478,0.0005757413,0.032494057,0.000917631,0.0007728813,0.06645925,0.85345757,0.000084552616],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09518583,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13695961,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09518583,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012714576,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0073144366,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18926352},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2953712355","doi":"10.18601/16577558.n30.04","title":"Canadá y la crisis de Venezuela","year":2019,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"OASIS","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"St. Francis Xavier University","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Art","score_opus":0.016491308341627164,"score_gpt":0.3553192005076725,"score_spread":0.33882789216604536,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2953712355","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.30475593,0.051790476,0.0004669804,0.06597798,0.00037869738,0.000040861032,0.00040990594,0.00003351697,0.57614565],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94310534,0.0071634576,0.00016255722,0.0024952113,0.00004536086,0.000017274866,0.000074489304,0.000012432704,0.046924006],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991605,0.00012948309,0.000012410956,0.00009203625,0.00013825846,0.00046725338],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995968,0.00009876268,0.00003818091,0.000020624064,0.000113909235,0.00013176103],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004284275,0.00019978685,0.00019816682,0.0010595169,0.013633193,0.006824527,0.0005584531,0.0015364834,0.007407728],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015143451,0.0001418665,0.00011608825,0.002465941,0.009004173,0.0013744143,0.0019862424,0.002228994,0.00016135028],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005333381,0.000025653077,0.0071657626,0.00011877405,0.00001226812,0.000603586,0.01701385,0.00071327185,0.00045999666,0.9275266,0.025430687,0.020876287],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000054810782,0.000023579354,0.0568853,0.0010559872,0.00004387393,0.00029426545,0.07179135,0.0008363328,0.00038800246,0.061140373,0.80742174,0.00006441244],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95418245,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9803182,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.062217563,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.062217563,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05057732,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.45142215},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2958725854","doi":"10.12804/revistas.urosario.edu.co/sociojuridicos/a.7543","title":"Jurisdicción especial indígena, derecho colombiano y normativa internacional: la necesidad de un equilibrio en el marco de la extracción de minerales y el impacto de género.","year":2019,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Estudios Socio-Jurídicos","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Geography; Philosophy","score_opus":0.010445986032402835,"score_gpt":0.35713210267021195,"score_spread":0.3466861166378091,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2958725854","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6610194,0.009650542,0.0024632867,0.009218994,0.00009922544,0.00005791788,0.00020359895,0.000026839214,0.31726012],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958224,0.00065984303,0.00026624638,0.00019469883,0.000009830803,0.000009199487,0.000017873155,0.0000042457164,0.0030155818],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969717,0.0011754396,0.000108229426,0.00045070142,0.0006601616,0.0006336475],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99506855,0.0019376976,0.0011302952,0.0003893007,0.0008805814,0.0005935495],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024499646,0.00021982424,0.00029453338,0.0017669162,0.004920696,0.007866875,0.0007222814,0.00077166077,0.0058781253],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00681286,0.0001403109,0.00013306629,0.0019740805,0.011817446,0.0025923452,0.0040908935,0.0012134024,0.0001491263],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012548035,0.000045051685,0.089797564,0.000624514,0.000040119816,0.0007072761,0.14106505,0.00039032422,0.0019959288,0.70644534,0.0034638508,0.055299584],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023485882,0.0001065823,0.35829672,0.0011965437,0.00011313278,0.00052938797,0.31964016,0.0005812172,0.0013724453,0.040843714,0.27716902,0.0001275718],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.22782312,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.45572734,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22782312,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013332424,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0125451265,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4529941},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2978029557","doi":"10.31672/55.8","title":"LOS ACTOS DE LOS GOBIERNOS DEPARTAMENTALES Y SU CONTROL POR LOS MECANISMOS DE GOBIERNO DIRECTO","year":2019,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"revista de derecho público","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Optech (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.019239750598205943,"score_gpt":0.3498415249561466,"score_spread":0.3306017743579407,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2978029557","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.33076224,0.0037718227,0.0037476507,0.012755818,0.0001153837,0.00015430433,0.00018070049,0.000054594024,0.64845747],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9518315,0.00058716256,0.0010060819,0.0007615758,0.000031730873,0.000114519265,0.00003226156,0.000013330478,0.04562187],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99814916,0.0008423224,0.000053007243,0.00023336826,0.0002605607,0.00046161248],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99912804,0.00035432767,0.00017951743,0.00010829792,0.00012056173,0.00010930408],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022966452,0.00018823556,0.00022550556,0.0007573384,0.0049741515,0.004725888,0.0008123968,0.0018832693,0.0063446793],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030116832,0.00023755779,0.00015282196,0.00092672295,0.008757016,0.0010195888,0.0025436443,0.0018777067,0.00039737765],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026823762,0.000021332155,0.0054749837,0.0000488419,0.000005467756,0.00019584571,0.013446532,0.00023488623,0.0005629592,0.9692886,0.0029721654,0.0077215573],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011763786,0.0000773995,0.070714846,0.0007427932,0.00007809974,0.00034468723,0.056534037,0.0016287542,0.0018324375,0.12395736,0.7438968,0.000075183256],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.15239483,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.267913,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15239483,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0069401497,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008208952,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3030156},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2978217647","doi":"","title":"El Sentido Histórico de la Institución del Ombudsman: Orígenes","year":2019,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Sapienza Organizacional","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; State (computer science); Law; Democracy; Economic Justice; Institution; Human rights; Public administration; Politics","score_opus":0.013187375170970185,"score_gpt":0.3314086244275566,"score_spread":0.3182212492565864,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2978217647","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3423936,0.051363412,0.009606638,0.015035776,0.0017902912,0.000032871027,0.000091585556,0.000100058176,0.5795858],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9811451,0.0029175486,0.00097471307,0.00028055356,0.0001620046,0.000016193919,0.00001876921,0.000021858212,0.014463231],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987275,0.00064804987,0.00003323288,0.0001836,0.00016035243,0.00024725855],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99965835,0.00013892664,0.000067604524,0.000043814085,0.000053225536,0.000038112175],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001960772,0.0003291229,0.00027896452,0.0016498382,0.006719609,0.0061684423,0.00046283935,0.0010121636,0.0023329984],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020550075,0.0001745347,0.00013585901,0.0017533946,0.022274142,0.0035685364,0.002565551,0.0023647645,0.00028539274],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014189831,0.000006020317,0.00066901,0.000024668143,0.0000014965945,0.00006760719,0.02520725,0.00005611218,0.00011328683,0.96372783,0.0009958794,0.009116658],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000984637,0.000045038778,0.004062319,0.00047650046,0.000014611148,0.00036529507,0.043790787,0.00019046618,0.00041870022,0.1278311,0.8227646,0.000030791904],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019557193,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.027600663,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019557193,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006616421,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028886138,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04800576},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2982482568","doi":"10.4000/bifea.10314","title":"La autonomía indígena «tutelada» en Bolivia","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Bulletin de l’Institut français d’études andines","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Art","score_opus":0.015308586190653593,"score_gpt":0.28455391779967953,"score_spread":0.2692453316090259,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2982482568","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5337107,0.038072377,0.0074207145,0.041053724,0.00034500574,0.00008644443,0.00029808385,0.00006465842,0.37894827],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9847416,0.0031928283,0.0007099523,0.0009940473,0.000027920754,0.000026441672,0.00003863271,0.000011771372,0.010256736],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99801934,0.00085961923,0.00006082573,0.00024627705,0.0001996936,0.000614382],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99912065,0.00034905368,0.00022739083,0.00008114987,0.00010825076,0.000113534144],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026975127,0.0002615362,0.00034229652,0.0015663622,0.0055584824,0.0057890797,0.00058715616,0.00085125247,0.0033501782],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022260393,0.00028738595,0.0002475211,0.0023391596,0.019731013,0.0025543142,0.004177843,0.0028337028,0.00019572937],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030687454,0.000014887734,0.00798476,0.000105115905,0.000013163324,0.00014557257,0.057165917,0.0003084997,0.00037430166,0.91411257,0.0020583128,0.017686225],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005520178,0.00010719581,0.09883881,0.0015732057,0.00006970111,0.00041211132,0.08477095,0.0006514391,0.0009890082,0.18669507,0.62573606,0.000101212776],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.14688914,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.20741095,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14688914,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.020583374,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012890326,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2920683},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2996244861","doi":"10.21501/23394536.3481","title":"La responsabilidad internacional de los estados","year":2019,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Summa Iuris","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Optech (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.017990542404647616,"score_gpt":0.3738635601137221,"score_spread":0.35587301770907454,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2996244861","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15046039,0.0019418808,0.008266903,0.013196756,0.00020281346,0.00003596744,0.00006394547,0.000042655483,0.82578874],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9478664,0.00067903224,0.00087725976,0.0011201757,0.00007656709,0.00004451754,0.00003527567,0.000017571057,0.04928327],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99378705,0.0030268233,0.0002001815,0.0006299601,0.0010525174,0.0013035125],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9947325,0.0014048914,0.00096659356,0.00080435694,0.0010563841,0.0010352089],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005560119,0.00025378374,0.00029196122,0.0010168029,0.0060098935,0.008080832,0.0007447852,0.0022396115,0.007161374],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0061301296,0.00026129393,0.00030171315,0.0010596486,0.022057615,0.0033683986,0.007524944,0.00421755,0.000593101],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012753713,0.000017926044,0.0018797849,0.000021929352,0.000004092918,0.00005083288,0.011881841,0.00006645373,0.00028689601,0.9801343,0.0010686083,0.0045746565],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000056787252,0.00016165631,0.02502342,0.00052453775,0.00004870551,0.0004211167,0.059443034,0.00037353733,0.0015790719,0.35977972,0.55252415,0.000064318934],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008846661,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024077324,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008846661,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0053213593,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010955582,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.038609326},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2997694682","doi":"","title":"Introducción al dossier: Pensando El Derecho en Clave Pro-Fémina","year":2017,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Repositorio Digital Institucional de la Universidad de Buenos Aires (Universidad de Buenos Aires)","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries; York University","keywords":"Derecho; Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.014361780680139156,"score_gpt":0.338524743516827,"score_spread":0.32416296283668783,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2997694682","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008649332,0.09024349,0.007433396,0.10737698,0.023827614,0.00008230561,0.00035404623,0.0002048357,0.76182795],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.23722635,0.07329651,0.00647667,0.03744829,0.018048113,0.00028018974,0.00043331212,0.0005485932,0.62624204],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980755,0.0010664487,0.00006194141,0.00031145103,0.00033008607,0.00015454747],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99827945,0.0010186201,0.00012980083,0.00014579084,0.00025900605,0.00016731079],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001421906,0.0010527049,0.0004970017,0.0017730253,0.004958607,0.008431088,0.00096454215,0.0034113568,0.027273113],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026218924,0.0003864552,0.0003583695,0.0018496653,0.01119955,0.0067921574,0.0052702455,0.0075564436,0.0053938814],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039636234,0.000022627744,0.00056676497,0.00027872747,0.000005198111,0.00021943037,0.028571637,0.00007718312,0.00045755465,0.79328483,0.12782331,0.048653137],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000021157598,0.000017588649,0.0003793448,0.00050514203,0.00000258131,0.00017371413,0.0057319445,0.000049386483,0.00009547834,0.02503105,0.9680035,0.000008306926],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005929751,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007604897,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027273113,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004334106,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001998557,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.091237664},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3002188859","doi":"10.51343/rfdcp.v4i11.156","title":"EL PROCESO CONSTITUYENTE Y LA VIOLENCIA POLÍTICA: LOS DEBATES CONSTITUCIONALES DE 1979 Y 1993 FRENTE A LA SUBVERSIÓN","year":2019,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Revista de la Facultad de Derecho y Ciencias Políticas (Cusco)","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Universidad de Buenos Aires; De La Salle University; Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea; York University; Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos; Universidad de Alicante","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.014753440361892573,"score_gpt":0.3568075970065477,"score_spread":0.3420541566446551,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3002188859","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.42884225,0.01552268,0.0025832215,0.032749087,0.0007165075,0.00012102531,0.00022103527,0.000020711072,0.5192235],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9680787,0.0040701637,0.0003845669,0.0019411036,0.0002257624,0.00009341652,0.000072031005,0.000024282532,0.025109908],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99550617,0.0016751969,0.0001344594,0.00041699983,0.0011078459,0.0011592893],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996214,0.0024025906,0.00045068192,0.00013510058,0.00040281337,0.00039475074],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0047552856,0.00033977552,0.00046352658,0.0019123572,0.01205972,0.01131917,0.0010326712,0.0029937283,0.008389334],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006235273,0.0002167558,0.00046516492,0.0038763573,0.012369568,0.0040460248,0.004256545,0.004397939,0.00053315744],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013743732,0.00007069448,0.004081178,0.00015145756,0.000014687717,0.00036880572,0.08084388,0.00027854225,0.0008290551,0.8812817,0.004755044,0.027187496],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000077833276,0.00013118888,0.0764155,0.00071138894,0.00005319779,0.0001949624,0.15435311,0.00036538916,0.0025822783,0.07714664,0.6879069,0.00006156925],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09399935,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13131885,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09399935,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.028912231,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01380991,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2097739},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3006335579","doi":"10.35707/dostresmil/1907","title":"El régimen jurídico de los actos administrativos del Banco de la República, ¿derecho administrativo o derecho económico?","year":2017,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Dos mil tres mil","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Optech (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Derecho; Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04419801381961101,"score_gpt":0.4407117384034791,"score_spread":0.3965137245838681,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3006335579","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04728446,0.007969223,0.025467537,0.18931504,0.0018362314,0.0001228271,0.0002162152,0.00009850094,0.7276899],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89243996,0.0041558747,0.0061041974,0.022195948,0.00079816877,0.00021032276,0.000091772854,0.000098392105,0.073905475],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98526484,0.007678073,0.0005636601,0.0015148248,0.0037175647,0.0012610076],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99474096,0.0023823115,0.0007103159,0.00097445893,0.0008699719,0.00032199555],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011394358,0.00030157168,0.0005192764,0.0010298324,0.0064385845,0.011881851,0.0017254313,0.005048951,0.005719555],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016136482,0.00034503738,0.0004361697,0.0020580618,0.028866416,0.00555903,0.0043616197,0.0108620515,0.00075525045],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000031876953,0.000005461667,0.00011501758,0.000012670391,0.0000015567028,0.000009964575,0.00083160726,0.000068976566,0.000062916166,0.9952369,0.0020385596,0.0016130909],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003620748,0.000045636385,0.0027554685,0.000394213,0.000021924408,0.00008237913,0.005647716,0.0007088533,0.00084561534,0.5201224,0.4692884,0.000051109062],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.026151514,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.038172547,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026151514,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011849988,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019772392,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08597803},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3020970558","doi":"","title":"El nuevo mecanismo de nombramiento de los Magistrados de la Corte Suprema Canadiense: ¿Un ejemplo que España debería seguir?","year":2020,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Revista General de Derecho Constitucional - ISSN 1886-6212","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.024278642201475374,"score_gpt":0.3467100251255775,"score_spread":0.3224313829241022,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3020970558","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19538133,0.0039463425,0.0075961147,0.021144403,0.00021765639,0.000066968925,0.00016302115,0.00004618981,0.77143794],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9237423,0.0011201798,0.0012719515,0.0012888138,0.0000352185,0.00002112567,0.00003398186,0.000024198858,0.07246222],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99750596,0.00046681295,0.000045017052,0.00040251212,0.00075737695,0.000822297],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99891937,0.00027347569,0.000079721554,0.00013274128,0.0003946031,0.00020008977],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001778753,0.00026190202,0.00026339898,0.0010257713,0.012388008,0.00962318,0.0013734036,0.0018778256,0.0064127655],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031082516,0.00019137545,0.00021441681,0.0018750874,0.026343428,0.0019674404,0.003388392,0.0023477606,0.0004317422],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010466417,0.000005775707,0.002423087,0.0000257431,0.0000042581505,0.00011286668,0.014414037,0.00013879927,0.00030617358,0.97064555,0.0028322206,0.009081006],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019873427,0.00005233844,0.034037467,0.00048146516,0.00007123962,0.00032504415,0.08990177,0.00068748946,0.0023835744,0.20684217,0.6651115,0.000086115404],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.79258734,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.90085405,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20741266,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03326688,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.044237725,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41726828},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3033975833","doi":"10.18601/01236458.n51.05","title":"Fundamentos para una estrategia metodológica de aplicación de la jurisprudencia constitucional en el sistema judicial del Ecuador","year":2020,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Con-texto","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Performance Plants (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.07671775752121204,"score_gpt":0.42544106835450857,"score_spread":0.34872331083329655,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3033975833","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12610921,0.008176579,0.4891454,0.057622205,0.00049684354,0.000554491,0.0005283374,0.00042063076,0.31694633],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9048249,0.0016234996,0.08132678,0.0009070344,0.00014903788,0.0005513064,0.00012531687,0.000085139065,0.010407014],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9862298,0.008317548,0.0010286715,0.0013916073,0.0023403335,0.0006920887],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9906736,0.004494688,0.0010355287,0.0016981065,0.0018539192,0.0002442332],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0146617945,0.00059621513,0.0009186293,0.0030614368,0.0039613238,0.015387932,0.0024620697,0.002752352,0.007752976],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02903674,0.00064533885,0.00087202305,0.0030953959,0.016847102,0.010595174,0.004670282,0.0042015975,0.0005840815],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007484257,0.0000066210737,0.00045919558,0.000041659918,0.000006141136,0.000030449995,0.0020641703,0.0008476025,0.00009746155,0.99158317,0.0003378875,0.0045181676],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019317578,0.000020736064,0.001121926,0.0002701517,0.000022471935,0.0000726499,0.0036332745,0.0046146,0.00041401238,0.9566651,0.033120524,0.00002516949],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011181484,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008677556,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015387932,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010614014,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008962914,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07753986},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3041108799","doi":"10.25267/rejucrim.2020.i1.6","title":"Neoconstitucionalismo ambiental y derechos de la Naturaleza en el marco del nuevo constitucionalismo latinoamericano: El caso de Colombia","year":2020,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Revista de Estudios Jurídicos y Criminológicos","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Optech (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Geography; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0322238755475989,"score_gpt":0.36302036121594433,"score_spread":0.3307964856683454,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3041108799","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24338715,0.011399412,0.0035196173,0.017933432,0.00024445317,0.000062260726,0.00014477171,0.000052295112,0.72325665],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98429215,0.0009938182,0.00038376206,0.00032363873,0.000040725557,0.000031786472,0.000021554968,0.000017666107,0.013895006],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986487,0.00055546494,0.00003323729,0.00021629372,0.00020109923,0.00034525257],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991749,0.00036297468,0.00011002762,0.000098891745,0.00013802202,0.00011510921],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011345639,0.00036094827,0.00035485224,0.0016058558,0.008561864,0.011192054,0.0006980883,0.0013115398,0.005348286],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002333549,0.00017240677,0.0001872035,0.0023665393,0.0229875,0.0034143897,0.0035784454,0.0020053363,0.0001503393],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028035078,0.000010186132,0.0028889445,0.00011045639,0.000003347792,0.00022430917,0.065641195,0.0001570721,0.0002809748,0.9189396,0.0026054212,0.009110368],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000034803797,0.000037675287,0.03571118,0.0004896833,0.00003976504,0.0003003196,0.2211355,0.0006598087,0.00058957224,0.116445616,0.6244934,0.00006267199],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.22399627,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.42066824,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22399627,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018217329,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008424111,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.44538498},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3048440481","doi":"","title":"As restrições existentes na celebração de tratados internacionais no Direito Tributário (Limitations on the Power to Make Tax Treaties: A Perspective from Brazilian Federalism)","year":2003,"lang":"pt","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Government (linguistics); Power (physics); Perspective (graphical); Political science; Portuguese; Welfare economics; Economics; Law","score_opus":0.0434603590547473,"score_gpt":0.33702558323720144,"score_spread":0.2935652241824541,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3048440481","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.27452543,0.0042178007,0.011915696,0.047857095,0.00014380518,0.000050977895,0.00018394068,0.000039343777,0.66106594],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9929669,0.00047505475,0.00072369294,0.00094741414,0.000046958405,0.000027481125,0.000014556832,0.000010374666,0.0047875396],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9890511,0.0043233163,0.0006293212,0.0014473277,0.0022066396,0.0023422008],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9866637,0.0072670705,0.0019127218,0.0020828776,0.0013143349,0.0007593624],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015210511,0.00026488534,0.00063740293,0.0013183018,0.009612679,0.010901176,0.0014716905,0.004198387,0.0048743007],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020046946,0.00056031113,0.0006181052,0.0020591072,0.029916976,0.005246964,0.0064594676,0.0058468087,0.00028684014],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006642019,0.000005620684,0.0005228009,0.000017016335,0.0000038811563,0.000036033787,0.0071144663,0.00012291143,0.00014730323,0.989804,0.0004044676,0.0018148907],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007382178,0.00006761255,0.014920496,0.0006617553,0.00009706318,0.0003519728,0.017817749,0.0014837317,0.0009949065,0.7655358,0.19791327,0.00008185958],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.052460514,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09200164,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.052460514,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011687693,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009005751,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.104310334},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3083988542","doi":"10.5377/cuadernojurypol.v5i14.11160","title":"El derecho político frente al «nuevo constitucionalismo latinoamericano». Análisis comparativo con el modelo de democracia constitucional","year":2019,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Cuaderno Jurídico y Político","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Optech (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02649206044515294,"score_gpt":0.36755097593231845,"score_spread":0.3410589154871655,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3083988542","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14904456,0.012682645,0.0067654084,0.027270656,0.00035881813,0.00005873434,0.00012477404,0.0000492727,0.80364525],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9492134,0.0038057219,0.0012922836,0.0015193365,0.0001627049,0.00006767554,0.00006545028,0.000034162385,0.043839175],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984509,0.0006929306,0.00004380191,0.0002746864,0.0002753282,0.00026241178],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99848527,0.00069058314,0.00027825934,0.00014722228,0.0002497095,0.0001489888],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017524093,0.00027015057,0.00029921182,0.0016670807,0.0045160414,0.010407528,0.00054992666,0.0010997038,0.01082196],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003074715,0.00014056265,0.00020648881,0.0021311105,0.012390849,0.0036500131,0.002494031,0.0016875805,0.00057664857],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025552801,0.000012119887,0.0046778545,0.0001416593,0.000006121231,0.000105001825,0.021790018,0.00009010469,0.00041178073,0.9565781,0.0021419658,0.014019732],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020216585,0.000051468094,0.03150088,0.0010138942,0.00004455841,0.00030995748,0.08096037,0.0004540716,0.0007699674,0.10896319,0.7758818,0.000029605486],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04107154,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08807755,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04107154,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008700858,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0054194485,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08166492},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3090070772","doi":"10.47712/rd.2019.v4i2.45","title":"EJERCICIO DEL DERECHO DEL CIUDADANO A LA REVOCATORIA DEL PARLAMENTARIO","year":2019,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"REVISTA DE DERECHO","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Optech (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Derecho; Philosophy","score_opus":0.025606592339305907,"score_gpt":0.3450405335345095,"score_spread":0.3194339411952036,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3090070772","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.28249764,0.009109008,0.008022217,0.051681947,0.0008569984,0.00022543775,0.00019109456,0.00018939674,0.6472263],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9181831,0.0035936984,0.0019993572,0.0025086768,0.00036717544,0.00018698019,0.000087600594,0.00007252233,0.07300078],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99221206,0.0041406658,0.00018202151,0.00072586857,0.0013969297,0.0013424851],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9926564,0.0027186824,0.0011748119,0.00074750726,0.0020143997,0.00068816065],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0061783367,0.00028440866,0.00022203497,0.0014740974,0.0054851375,0.009979367,0.0013775843,0.002208993,0.009579248],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014396436,0.00022630337,0.00031721956,0.0018948322,0.007085286,0.004065436,0.006178114,0.002046203,0.0009428697],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007928473,0.00006146406,0.020445352,0.00083238626,0.000039286457,0.0020074192,0.2267077,0.00051465485,0.0021717676,0.63186234,0.032085124,0.083193235],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009035957,0.00007815321,0.027998423,0.00068293914,0.000029351871,0.00035588074,0.09941588,0.00025833875,0.0010870702,0.0131744845,0.8568682,0.00004222842],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016972465,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.039749432,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016972465,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0058335084,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011891327,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04232526},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3108959183","doi":"10.32457/riem.vi3.434","title":"Consideraciones sobre el Régimen Municipal Argentino","year":2011,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Revista iberoamericana de estudios municipales","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Optech (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.07759291257997766,"score_gpt":0.3563236753302094,"score_spread":0.2787307627502318,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3108959183","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.54284424,0.00675054,0.0008388253,0.022335203,0.00013108525,0.00005212193,0.0003935366,0.000028827431,0.4266256],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9641494,0.0016762569,0.00023336652,0.00070736144,0.000043527372,0.000027776396,0.000078319696,0.000012822593,0.033071104],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990339,0.000373632,0.000022768389,0.000112382884,0.00013671434,0.00032055413],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99955314,0.00010677002,0.00008731769,0.000026479,0.00011772447,0.00010849341],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008009948,0.00015265025,0.00021013399,0.0006339408,0.008918752,0.0034721324,0.0005084896,0.0009623197,0.007423803],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011677825,0.00017798376,0.00010865637,0.0013244149,0.004062178,0.000972517,0.0016387133,0.0013146331,0.0002567434],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015735354,0.00005643315,0.028383553,0.00026799942,0.000023322384,0.0020659682,0.15502807,0.0011691275,0.00075905403,0.73126954,0.0319107,0.048908938],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024722805,0.00006870688,0.10152123,0.00036496163,0.000042860975,0.00028296234,0.09450225,0.0005095207,0.00028516506,0.011190593,0.79117966,0.000027444055],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4523733,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.66341144,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4523733,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018102238,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005488978,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8994804},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3111272487","doi":"10.28939/iam.debats.134-2.11","title":"NOGUERA FERNÁNDEZ, Albert La ideología de la soberanía. Hacia una reconstrucción emancipadora del constitucionalismo","year":2020,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Debats Revista de cultura poder i societat","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Okanagan College","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.029591007120229957,"score_gpt":0.35700537850975034,"score_spread":0.3274143713895204,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3111272487","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013653871,0.0756943,0.003107064,0.2699139,0.005680468,0.000032027867,0.00018555348,0.00007248175,0.6316603],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5446643,0.047850173,0.0031038087,0.030552402,0.002000048,0.00009256836,0.00014299103,0.00017025686,0.37142354],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99902034,0.0005010588,0.000030401286,0.00015186748,0.00020272503,0.00009371385],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989303,0.00054425554,0.00009496688,0.000082090795,0.00023453031,0.00011394135],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012781473,0.00053935364,0.00024296793,0.00086214434,0.0056730136,0.006092492,0.000611301,0.0027407308,0.009966664],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029970077,0.00021023258,0.00027193647,0.00079975586,0.008074887,0.0049135354,0.0018580925,0.004384195,0.0013721328],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027202665,0.000022038845,0.00057591865,0.00007864892,0.0000057740563,0.00012293407,0.008773603,0.000047146277,0.00016719637,0.8757078,0.09650686,0.017964877],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013951425,0.000010852405,0.001873399,0.00037581546,0.000008082879,0.000136825,0.009015087,0.00009146676,0.000302072,0.18077698,0.80738395,0.000011466218],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020781558,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05618852,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020781558,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0049416064,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004358515,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04132116},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3118614791","doi":"","title":"El reenvío en el Derecho Internacional Privado contemporáneo","year":2020,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Derecho; Humanities; Geography; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.06599963428179362,"score_gpt":0.4028983771535709,"score_spread":0.3368987428717773,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3118614791","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.74742866,0.001364985,0.003891248,0.007661412,0.000060374445,0.00005365709,0.000103769074,0.000032162443,0.23940368],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97229314,0.0003136009,0.0003460592,0.00033473852,0.000011441523,0.000018188353,0.0000192368,0.000014251772,0.026649162],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972314,0.0007717034,0.000047556256,0.00028659095,0.00050897925,0.0011537537],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965139,0.0012643277,0.00042217807,0.00038516888,0.00077080505,0.000643555],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002099802,0.00013319628,0.00023919147,0.0007259256,0.008159775,0.0050863097,0.0008143243,0.0011463113,0.006694199],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005760317,0.00019700441,0.00015518896,0.0013807518,0.011009563,0.0025400212,0.0035248755,0.002103194,0.00024439354],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006416345,0.00004135101,0.019435538,0.000075612385,0.000011359562,0.000455632,0.10620594,0.0007191103,0.0011874038,0.8509978,0.004220529,0.016585533],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004468436,0.00012416691,0.160914,0.0006216652,0.000052629654,0.00049590826,0.2887603,0.0014105046,0.0018352666,0.04375427,0.50189847,0.00008810784],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.57342255,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7903449,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.57342255,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.024094263,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.026258752,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.85817933},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122691247","doi":"","title":"ESPECIALISTAS ANALIZAN IMPACTOS DE LA REGULACIÓN DE LA CANNABIS. SEMINARIO INTERNACIONAL EN JURÍDICAS","year":2019,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Gaceta UNAM (2010-2019)","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.010933712318928852,"score_gpt":0.34816616555671587,"score_spread":0.337232453237787,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122691247","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5214792,0.024820067,0.006904794,0.03581562,0.0009855229,0.00038704945,0.003016189,0.00019200938,0.40639955],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88686585,0.013072884,0.0028735532,0.0038795206,0.0002635117,0.00021229705,0.00087243074,0.000088880464,0.09187113],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975586,0.00072492467,0.000089619556,0.00044923663,0.00075179077,0.0004257694],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99614465,0.0013227306,0.0008796642,0.00023776805,0.0011217436,0.00029342994],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031976858,0.00031436392,0.00030741905,0.0026014503,0.0056652967,0.0035270199,0.0006504336,0.0012075428,0.019163325],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0067207036,0.00022766007,0.0004269858,0.0034220584,0.003041267,0.002087684,0.0029068924,0.001649472,0.0011429715],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00077087234,0.00032891522,0.24356577,0.004298439,0.00035406006,0.0017641858,0.19026577,0.00071615266,0.009028043,0.19551781,0.069848776,0.2835412],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023359415,0.00019884892,0.2600107,0.0011274781,0.00017870164,0.00030100564,0.08286665,0.00029991407,0.0034110786,0.009156463,0.64236414,0.00006168088],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.078786835,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16704985,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.078786835,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0076338253,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008181287,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1566565},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125089694","doi":"10.30827/acfs.v55i0.15579","title":"Pluralismo liberal, razón pública y libertades básicas","year":2021,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Anales de la Cátedra Francisco Suárez","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.017239529139084844,"score_gpt":0.3591622275219714,"score_spread":0.3419226983828866,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125089694","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09616721,0.004684735,0.013392913,0.040043917,0.00026261018,0.00006959093,0.00009509142,0.00004812619,0.8452358],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9555449,0.0011865534,0.0021211384,0.00236399,0.0003508817,0.00009383872,0.00004153249,0.000041061656,0.038256105],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9916134,0.0034850102,0.00029182012,0.0012078467,0.0022320535,0.0011698257],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9913243,0.004323175,0.0008641252,0.0019816484,0.00087802124,0.0006287221],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009909776,0.00037638,0.0008407828,0.002066822,0.008463863,0.013527668,0.0014747946,0.0047100713,0.007498978],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0116333775,0.0005094395,0.0005610214,0.0026037076,0.06075943,0.0120654935,0.0077301925,0.008030289,0.00057214947],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000029618093,0.0000050538856,0.00005401062,0.0000065248573,7.925226e-7,0.0000065707477,0.0013604134,0.000020551935,0.000031045725,0.9976866,0.00023022157,0.0005953071],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016869588,0.000015057991,0.0009144151,0.00005009169,0.000005618621,0.000037131733,0.0030175513,0.00012632021,0.00012765855,0.95247364,0.043208238,0.0000073271467],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0069810795,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009955825,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013527668,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009033682,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0073065055,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06554425},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3143043853","doi":"","title":"«Lo que nos depara el futuro» - Preguntas filosóficas acerca del futuro del derecho público","year":2015,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Revista europea de historia de las ideas políticas y de las instituciones públicas/Revista europea de historia de las ideas políticas y de las instituciones públicas","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.040744329659772704,"score_gpt":0.3416598115803419,"score_spread":0.3009154819205692,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3143043853","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.064784296,0.021457223,0.0041160122,0.086275965,0.0010247071,0.000045853325,0.00019300793,0.00009930849,0.82200354],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8099062,0.009018089,0.0009483378,0.0068519753,0.00042414817,0.000051916897,0.00009103213,0.00009403294,0.1726143],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964224,0.0014050109,0.00008188376,0.0004279614,0.0007817708,0.0008809347],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99800307,0.000602439,0.00020900024,0.00020385097,0.00061316503,0.00036839282],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023610867,0.00044406403,0.00036099885,0.001370471,0.014714525,0.018243171,0.0010781843,0.0034170013,0.013480826],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0039995885,0.0002137526,0.00031273684,0.0018189913,0.019613745,0.006975396,0.004052544,0.004097847,0.001726671],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017920851,0.00001438534,0.0018296385,0.00010516369,0.000005018002,0.00020718892,0.038389683,0.00010248685,0.0002080026,0.91617095,0.025949433,0.01700007],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006456925,0.000013444635,0.005308701,0.00049613544,0.000010809045,0.0001581458,0.047277622,0.00014937887,0.00037211206,0.04124483,0.90493214,0.000030246365],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.21173197,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3024563,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21173197,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.026016343,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018998649,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4209991},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3155677309","doi":"","title":"Régimen jurídico de las regiones y los departamentos: análisis crítico de la descentralización territorial en Colombia","year":2021,"lang":"es","type":"dissertation","venue":"TDX (Tesis Doctorals en Xarxa)","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Geography; Cartography; Philosophy","score_opus":0.018744466093575125,"score_gpt":0.3921418352272874,"score_spread":0.3733973691337123,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3155677309","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.47386417,0.017923204,0.003638445,0.041322883,0.00054663006,0.00012787475,0.0009818837,0.00009624603,0.46149865],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9882089,0.0019470695,0.00041601408,0.0010078574,0.000069611306,0.000040697963,0.000116734744,0.00003073356,0.008162343],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99543625,0.001550288,0.00027114194,0.0006768726,0.0011486977,0.00091677066],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99305564,0.0021670384,0.0017637128,0.0004832504,0.0017065987,0.0008237797],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003472294,0.0003097334,0.00044540368,0.003171941,0.0123438295,0.011015763,0.0014339199,0.0013192558,0.008928105],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011668205,0.00025862706,0.0001952615,0.0047085737,0.013515475,0.004344539,0.0054940926,0.0028436033,0.00034252962],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000119505195,0.000027899396,0.06487789,0.0010887897,0.000047848895,0.00077453954,0.3829957,0.00049325224,0.0006262789,0.4689721,0.02884631,0.05112988],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014766235,0.00002532531,0.13801432,0.0010707347,0.00007127521,0.0002895368,0.37543547,0.00034317598,0.00033306767,0.010166896,0.4741424,0.00009311318],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.40601376,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6036008,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.40601376,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.021576483,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015208441,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.807301},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3160863273","doi":"","title":"Jen Moore c. el Ministerio del Interior del Peru et al (informe de amicus curiae) (Jen Moore v. Minister of the Interior of Peru et al (Amicus Curiae Brief))","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Thompson Rivers University","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Derecho; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0203055209684275,"score_gpt":0.35066740528230145,"score_spread":0.3303618843138739,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3160863273","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0027562403,0.07575665,0.00043410633,0.69588166,0.012110411,0.00009399926,0.00065150356,0.00009918827,0.2122162],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.05277435,0.037925575,0.00062465505,0.3534648,0.0053191874,0.00043705085,0.00040107072,0.00017860222,0.5488747],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99704486,0.00092703477,0.00014077866,0.00049505435,0.0007122571,0.0006800113],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99751735,0.0013745605,0.00020556142,0.000088992005,0.00050643313,0.0003070832],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002731876,0.00077498064,0.0004692853,0.0008811337,0.008603622,0.0068766354,0.0013825354,0.014095605,0.047223754],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009170666,0.0007808246,0.0004903839,0.0020990088,0.0025236604,0.005894418,0.004759591,0.0105016995,0.010399733],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001555659,0.0000114952845,0.0005038949,0.00019539849,0.000007086079,0.00015551479,0.0024414146,0.000043433294,0.00011407214,0.039535947,0.9483476,0.0086285705],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000040869504,0.000006220942,0.0015600604,0.000209286,0.000004219452,0.000040155785,0.0012513454,0.000014604603,0.00005155422,0.002148665,0.99469614,0.000013600568],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10775608,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13786395,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10775608,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0068818643,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012881707,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21425772},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3164812074","doi":"","title":"A quienes sancionar? Maximos responsables y participacion determinante en la Jurisdiccion Especial para la Paz","year":2020,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Open Access at Essex (University of Essex)","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Environment and Climate Change Canada","keywords":"Physics","score_opus":0.12280311285272978,"score_gpt":0.427438487425281,"score_spread":0.30463537457255124,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3164812074","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.46623927,0.001699733,0.012839267,0.016308557,0.0001296205,0.000077624136,0.00010491003,0.000049636394,0.5025514],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9900658,0.000140792,0.0008914016,0.0003303985,0.000021291307,0.000023381632,0.00001208582,0.000013963967,0.00850092],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9870647,0.0064033377,0.00040066818,0.0015700137,0.0017453732,0.0028159036],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98694164,0.0071143457,0.0012956279,0.0014170104,0.0019503172,0.0012811148],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01422839,0.00027514898,0.00062511314,0.0016878712,0.008252519,0.012564404,0.0015648595,0.0037092278,0.0092944475],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025630165,0.000486947,0.0003691502,0.0016453828,0.014334274,0.007041052,0.006202529,0.0042660423,0.0008517226],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035125264,0.000036163063,0.005038343,0.000025977914,0.00001081678,0.00010467214,0.013108478,0.00024374093,0.00034993046,0.9711745,0.0008812542,0.008991099],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006112138,0.0001574539,0.052030057,0.0004891075,0.00008790122,0.00056375767,0.07920966,0.0017624072,0.0011143183,0.7513932,0.113035806,0.00009513955],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016013904,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.032689642,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016013904,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004515128,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0070756376,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.075247824},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3173603788","doi":"10.7202/1079424ar","title":"Strategies for Compliance with Non-Binding International Decisions: The Spanish Case","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue québécoise de droit international","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Compliance (psychology); Jurisdiction; Human rights; Treaty; Constitution; Covenant; Political science; Law; State (computer science); International law; International human rights law; State responsibility; Subject (documents); Law and economics; Sociology; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.07169632879697992,"score_gpt":0.37075330807347084,"score_spread":0.29905697927649094,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3173603788","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18884347,0.0017889712,0.010532477,0.05710759,0.0003096545,0.00026621638,0.000070394686,0.00007232092,0.74100894],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95000535,0.0005988074,0.0021168552,0.008928542,0.00013256478,0.00018437611,0.00004095585,0.000055890545,0.037936542],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97044444,0.014777024,0.001009176,0.0021523747,0.004765926,0.006851136],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98611623,0.0074886335,0.0011328224,0.0019948941,0.0023467652,0.0009206566],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.038775586,0.0005110559,0.0007312765,0.0015830887,0.01297813,0.01802023,0.002703933,0.012544902,0.005527883],"category_scores_gemma":[0.040047504,0.00042838423,0.000976474,0.002218806,0.021745944,0.005718606,0.008670849,0.009956854,0.000772239],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000144283185,0.000045855206,0.0010041314,0.000016760208,0.000007889481,0.00048752688,0.0073972293,0.0003846046,0.0000988191,0.98414433,0.0030461994,0.0033521012],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033077004,0.000102578364,0.0041375207,0.000459216,0.00009104456,0.00064188655,0.035368346,0.0047873226,0.0013634893,0.61304945,0.33953896,0.0001294088],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.078881614,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05249068,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.078881614,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016208155,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02289078,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20506734},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3179400873","doi":"","title":"Los métodos de la reforma informal (The Methods of Informal Amendment)","year":2019,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Sociology; Art","score_opus":0.012897209102573077,"score_gpt":0.38898907605203054,"score_spread":0.37609186694945745,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3179400873","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08889639,0.0056691472,0.23536114,0.01202876,0.00094984623,0.0010079655,0.0006805474,0.00047266323,0.6549335],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86376417,0.0014302097,0.04507668,0.0008641768,0.00036441715,0.00095383235,0.00018638345,0.00025310658,0.08710701],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9822809,0.012379981,0.0007202963,0.0010957518,0.0027961512,0.000726972],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9806368,0.009483297,0.001940326,0.0049262317,0.002448666,0.00056478416],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014131127,0.0005084831,0.00043247791,0.0020672842,0.0029196953,0.0056433454,0.0017637426,0.0017586047,0.016459703],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026904618,0.0002560565,0.00058367697,0.0024945294,0.011800447,0.0038619307,0.005502248,0.001790536,0.001987852],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006986441,0.00004212204,0.0012849702,0.00030714087,0.000012904317,0.00006511824,0.008280234,0.00076482905,0.0004932744,0.91710246,0.0051682214,0.06640883],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012190216,0.00018001028,0.0035112556,0.0006607759,0.0000348275,0.00018664951,0.0070557105,0.0022704287,0.0021961837,0.35144368,0.6322827,0.000055983164],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0048920144,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006671636,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016459703,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0057300483,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0044908845,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.074733436},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3189081890","doi":"10.15517/id.2020.45931","title":"DERECHO, SISTEMA Y LEGITIMACIÓN. LA PROPUESTA HABERMASIANA: LA SUPERACIÓN INDIVIDUALISTA DEL \"SUJETO\" POR LA CATEGORÍA DE LA \"INTERSUBJETIVIDAD\"","year":2021,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Revista Jurídica IUS Doctrina","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"HIV Legal Network","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.02169864666525912,"score_gpt":0.36917995542870014,"score_spread":0.347481308763441,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3189081890","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.067642726,0.016732639,0.035766795,0.08013484,0.0011948228,0.000057643974,0.00010154569,0.00008532391,0.7982837],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96481854,0.0018711833,0.0026149633,0.0024343173,0.00041951906,0.00006710538,0.000027236643,0.00004287828,0.027704174],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9931229,0.0040281047,0.0002229979,0.0009606816,0.0011457308,0.0005195602],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961892,0.0021352856,0.00038803127,0.0005192683,0.000532989,0.00023531503],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0067815473,0.00048870256,0.0004796025,0.0020778251,0.0057137795,0.010283403,0.0010661168,0.0045288964,0.0045565115],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008387121,0.00035053265,0.00047849264,0.0016550086,0.07542777,0.007561559,0.0052520186,0.0054126936,0.0006455628],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000022317256,0.0000018946661,0.00009660069,0.000009852414,8.325951e-7,0.000011606546,0.0024058155,0.000020844716,0.000033630135,0.995843,0.00040171735,0.0011720252],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012493145,0.000019663137,0.00088178215,0.0001563623,0.000008833977,0.00007864782,0.005099126,0.00020274073,0.00021588927,0.92157227,0.07173781,0.000014273266],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0060766526,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0070250784,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010283403,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0046297247,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005054461,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03586471},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3207643404","doi":"","title":"Globalización, ética de mercado y derechos humanos","year":2020,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Aequitas Revue de développement humain handicap et changement social","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.11613296338579915,"score_gpt":0.42813717478069296,"score_spread":0.3120042113948938,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3207643404","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0649719,0.04018193,0.01801564,0.07916852,0.0023651419,0.000051635507,0.00028444108,0.00016011465,0.7948006],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8995719,0.018042149,0.0025642437,0.008728537,0.0018777656,0.00009232462,0.00016544994,0.00015415454,0.06880343],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981535,0.0008281586,0.000056128458,0.00033866504,0.00031491116,0.00030857],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99819034,0.00083106034,0.0003444648,0.00019345549,0.0002598741,0.00018071165],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001457841,0.0005721328,0.00033146818,0.0014750888,0.0036161935,0.008837338,0.0009789859,0.0030278394,0.009228508],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031450223,0.00014860251,0.00037918406,0.0021488215,0.016335852,0.006829034,0.004445251,0.0029034794,0.0011861767],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018003266,0.0000060583066,0.0014206622,0.00014728961,0.000006930426,0.00018544865,0.033056654,0.00017779348,0.00014104073,0.94503266,0.010280672,0.009526788],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007655094,0.00003110753,0.009137351,0.00092844124,0.000020963349,0.0005635229,0.040721092,0.00039936902,0.00037258526,0.24156617,0.7062115,0.000040250532],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009994991,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009230308,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009994991,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0042305687,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002328962,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030872405},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3209843414","doi":"","title":"Alcances y límites de los derechos humanos desde una racionalidad analógica","year":2020,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Aequitas Revue de développement humain handicap et changement social","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.11246295510379468,"score_gpt":0.44241414055728545,"score_spread":0.3299511854534908,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3209843414","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20366839,0.00423813,0.04605361,0.018970022,0.00039521293,0.000046104866,0.00014166116,0.00022291318,0.7262639],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9800371,0.0007814799,0.0030098853,0.00065118854,0.00010500953,0.00004125234,0.00003778887,0.000048340076,0.015287857],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99512285,0.002653459,0.00013393443,0.0009163741,0.0007805688,0.00039279458],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99510324,0.0020597994,0.0006055591,0.0009501205,0.00096391037,0.00031727893],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035910967,0.00060754357,0.0003625861,0.001643192,0.0031229004,0.008505402,0.001072246,0.0023838878,0.010517438],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0072844657,0.0003833468,0.00040802328,0.0011594025,0.038070884,0.009292113,0.0056650634,0.002807207,0.0009090655],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030813393,0.000008662742,0.0008936297,0.00004836886,0.0000066170514,0.00013823491,0.040447187,0.00017832972,0.00042701187,0.95186067,0.0008954882,0.0050651017],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000322769,0.000040926767,0.0038214305,0.00026173666,0.000035644607,0.00044372215,0.04509729,0.0010054719,0.000739361,0.83737415,0.11109053,0.000057519665],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0064809364,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0038121354,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010517438,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004507772,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019269264,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.035184383},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3211148681","doi":"10.26514/inter.v12i35.5813","title":"Estudo Comparado Internacional em Educação Especial: Documentos Normativos e Orientadores no Brasil e no Canadá - International Comparative Study in Special Education: Normative and Guideline Documents in Brazil and Canada","year":2021,"lang":"pt","type":"article","venue":"INTERFACES DA EDUCAÇÃO","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Normative; Humanities; Guideline; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.032292518092150065,"score_gpt":0.38617290652090047,"score_spread":0.3538803884287504,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3211148681","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9363196,0.0030743787,0.00071640423,0.0029654284,0.000044951063,0.0002146906,0.0009334462,0.000025470921,0.055705633],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9944976,0.0012199901,0.0005350719,0.00017079775,0.000005939386,0.000072258896,0.00023990496,0.000012366189,0.0032461134],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98777974,0.003019128,0.00096651167,0.0008835858,0.0057651745,0.0015857965],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9562941,0.011557951,0.005561616,0.0019291413,0.021944769,0.0027125138],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014311628,0.00025241743,0.0005451888,0.00610866,0.005533115,0.0045993947,0.0011804013,0.0004626347,0.0021098957],"category_scores_gemma":[0.036052246,0.0003255038,0.0003021559,0.012909822,0.004949376,0.0014314047,0.0025989607,0.00091605226,0.00010647547],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001578109,0.00012960263,0.3882162,0.00084673613,0.000085780164,0.0005013302,0.47933286,0.0002614086,0.00087620603,0.02789888,0.0047605867,0.09693257],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010730718,0.00007870511,0.6469552,0.00079450425,0.0000708626,0.00014388122,0.30621278,0.00014370035,0.00066920946,0.00067456195,0.04420022,0.00004564904],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9347279,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.95861536,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06527209,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05016817,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1099125,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36399728},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3211815032","doi":"","title":"El rol de Canadá frente a la Comisión Interamericana de Derechos Humanos en el contexto de la OEA/ The role of Canada before the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights in the framework of the OAS","year":2012,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Cuestiones Jurídicas","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.021306835806628135,"score_gpt":0.4076690892223403,"score_spread":0.3863622534157122,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3211815032","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14296658,0.013585523,0.0031429336,0.11760125,0.00067348237,0.00006044353,0.00026740957,0.000045614815,0.7216567],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9346695,0.0057694153,0.000921734,0.008514491,0.00015195868,0.000030509902,0.000054599426,0.000036666388,0.049851123],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99292517,0.001584179,0.00009209699,0.00055823993,0.0025130995,0.0023272024],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99443096,0.0013840046,0.0005215834,0.00023141436,0.002135779,0.0012961711],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035489814,0.0003298768,0.000355136,0.0019358966,0.019904342,0.01688689,0.0012538717,0.002887392,0.0070269913],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005881512,0.00019847468,0.00032399662,0.0038286117,0.025595384,0.0036024132,0.004664981,0.00382617,0.00046531818],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018761591,0.000012964011,0.0045233597,0.000055688037,0.000008000915,0.00021275175,0.020422114,0.00022106167,0.00018010398,0.9496772,0.011517848,0.0131500885],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017024433,0.000024025776,0.020852052,0.00095571496,0.000052731168,0.00023097289,0.109905645,0.000601469,0.00060119346,0.06891942,0.7977455,0.00009420369],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9381567,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96526986,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07152466,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07152466,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1828758,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5189501},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3214812954","doi":"10.4000/books.psorbonne.90192","title":"La désobéissance civile ou l’expression vertueuse d’un désaccord sur les valeurs fondamentales de la démocratie constitutionnelle","year":2020,"lang":"fr","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Éditions de la Sorbonne eBooks","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Political science; Humanities","score_opus":0.04022877128376393,"score_gpt":0.3057225903604062,"score_spread":0.26549381907664227,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3214812954","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006575474,0.01354718,0.0014639426,0.019430328,0.0009788009,0.000013802172,0.000087526074,0.000048615162,0.9578544],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.30237347,0.008427644,0.0010819297,0.004372588,0.00080946437,0.000055503704,0.00011030336,0.00012549711,0.68264353],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989008,0.00042226067,0.000019878615,0.0001537511,0.0002530724,0.00025028127],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994709,0.00027243412,0.0000472494,0.000081448256,0.00008810092,0.000039846993],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008877254,0.0004367016,0.000208081,0.00063078065,0.0053744162,0.0051526106,0.00045146447,0.001858703,0.014089914],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018304086,0.00025425456,0.00019487129,0.0009400133,0.012388841,0.0026485187,0.0019914755,0.0034003204,0.002719225],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007134557,0.0000042770757,0.000085495274,0.000016777129,0.0000013768747,0.00002033055,0.0025051758,0.000035445883,0.00012621003,0.9648111,0.026526313,0.005860338],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000574774,0.000011539839,0.00077253033,0.000118971024,0.0000033979748,0.0000532742,0.0014221942,0.0000839015,0.00029029377,0.07210019,0.92513114,0.000006828475],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02122739,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05533323,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02122739,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005299114,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0045287907,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.047135472},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3217670636","doi":"10.4067/s0718-80722021000300303","title":"EL DERECHO A LA ALIMENTACIÓN ADECUADA EN CHILE Y SU NECESARIA CONSAGRACIÓN COMO DERECHO FUNDAMENTAL EN LA NUEVA CONSTITUCIÓN CHILENA","year":2021,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Revista chilena de derecho privado","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Derecho; Philosophy; Humanities; Political science","score_opus":0.01581440022953749,"score_gpt":0.34891546645991184,"score_spread":0.33310106623037433,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3217670636","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09672974,0.024899539,0.0066773626,0.083719656,0.00063158374,0.000112101,0.00028103765,0.0000807461,0.7868683],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.83359987,0.016281568,0.0031574254,0.007143602,0.00075641926,0.00028020324,0.00016535177,0.00007591198,0.13853966],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970011,0.0011771255,0.00011649297,0.00042596407,0.0007635619,0.0005157618],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975987,0.0012583863,0.000328654,0.00027499747,0.00036499512,0.00017423167],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004343151,0.00032289117,0.00036841715,0.0014004316,0.0046891184,0.010200505,0.0010393962,0.0027881889,0.007689307],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005342263,0.00035206354,0.0003210929,0.0018267592,0.028212646,0.0038689775,0.00517764,0.0042383038,0.0005195373],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016319525,0.000016658374,0.0006925867,0.00015751005,0.0000048579614,0.00022520054,0.011933571,0.00021214201,0.00043939537,0.9736192,0.0033522798,0.009330173],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004467082,0.000048244,0.00654307,0.00090433925,0.000019899077,0.00025301275,0.016186224,0.00031777128,0.00079025514,0.20123589,0.77360106,0.000055649536],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05453194,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05402639,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05453194,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015883122,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.021636965,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11524063},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W32847991","doi":"10.1136/oemed-2020-106470","title":"El constitucionalismo latinoamericano y la codificación en el siglo XIX","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Anuario Iberoamericano de Justicia Constitucional","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Fonds de Recherche du Québec - Santé; Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Institut de Recherche Robert-Sauvé en Santé et en Sécurité du Travail; Cancer Research Society","keywords":"Humanities; Latin Americans; Political science; Art; Law","score_opus":0.03147410561429315,"score_gpt":0.3499861123954017,"score_spread":0.3185120067811086,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W32847991","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6368179,0.025778415,0.0014493627,0.04174302,0.0003023021,0.00002610839,0.0002739666,0.000017565962,0.29359138],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98132527,0.005987366,0.0005868481,0.001462375,0.00016622036,0.000022203607,0.00011430163,0.000014269381,0.010321009],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990984,0.00036486643,0.00003419308,0.00012346126,0.00019288763,0.00018610296],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982191,0.00086683675,0.00045009537,0.00014849834,0.0001912378,0.00012425214],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003149332,0.00013426233,0.00021445136,0.0013092029,0.0016510119,0.0037385942,0.00032805654,0.00075232907,0.0043905703],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004687105,0.00010044143,0.00016641064,0.0023123182,0.006660995,0.0018796059,0.0015842076,0.0011627876,0.0001479036],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010762286,0.000050064547,0.047479488,0.00020215439,0.000027822261,0.00019724884,0.030286921,0.00012363626,0.00080332364,0.8706992,0.0042584077,0.045764115],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000079505146,0.00012114639,0.19342421,0.0017080015,0.00008128228,0.00028484382,0.056529745,0.00034956104,0.0010278537,0.13407186,0.6122831,0.000038875372],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.033321965,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.056380127,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.033321965,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025029823,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027491667,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06625605},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3601015","doi":"10.1227/00006123-198705000-00004","title":"¿Nuevos derechos a debate?: razones para no resistir","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Anuario de Filosofía del Derecho","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05989594409544469,"score_gpt":0.3570506483159381,"score_spread":0.2971547042204934,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3601015","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0038059955,0.00868081,0.00027977134,0.97884357,0.005289345,0.0000064815517,0.000022846285,0.000019878104,0.0030514093],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.16025512,0.017709559,0.0014410221,0.7817652,0.03180518,0.00007262285,0.00008821952,0.00011377174,0.006749299],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97866917,0.012199588,0.001813466,0.0019215649,0.0038231374,0.0015730802],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.884519,0.07414731,0.0074909166,0.004999813,0.021658156,0.0071848966],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.060463924,0.00044559076,0.0009864672,0.0016269077,0.0041041602,0.010675587,0.003658675,0.013889168,0.0048434855],"category_scores_gemma":[0.18965739,0.00048955093,0.0006429621,0.0014043822,0.017139172,0.014604089,0.0044390685,0.016502185,0.0018137929],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00053901656,0.00019927522,0.026671372,0.0012125012,0.00020155,0.0007188379,0.011785692,0.00022771448,0.00032098868,0.09316819,0.51539,0.3495648],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003517158,0.000253916,0.013079877,0.007110308,0.0002330302,0.0010411825,0.037552737,0.00040023585,0.0005174951,0.12242861,0.8168258,0.00020508163],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010302489,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015320612,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.060463924,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0053681848,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011179181,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3197676},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4200235447","doi":"10.18042/cepc/igdes.5.02","title":"La futura Constitución chilena será escrita con mujeres","year":2021,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"IgualdadES","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"WSP (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03411169070354164,"score_gpt":0.37035834183293537,"score_spread":0.3362466511293937,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4200235447","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11948295,0.006345592,0.0070803533,0.022061301,0.00034365582,0.00010554625,0.0002502055,0.000068929534,0.84426147],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8565131,0.004634849,0.0021688994,0.0016809441,0.0002879427,0.0002125769,0.00015303309,0.000059012906,0.13428965],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981616,0.00073209987,0.00006904698,0.00027686832,0.00038236807,0.000378059],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983695,0.0005006598,0.000228638,0.00031366153,0.00037255458,0.00021505321],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027282878,0.00046045796,0.0003923351,0.0021376396,0.0071173846,0.009834326,0.0010719238,0.0016880037,0.012163018],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0034954885,0.0002617213,0.0004062014,0.0024137283,0.014886483,0.0062912614,0.005683182,0.0026621951,0.00080746086],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016257141,0.000011796221,0.0022441607,0.00009806696,0.0000066579337,0.00022485951,0.026845047,0.00012622838,0.00022278434,0.95401675,0.0042486,0.011938783],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022007905,0.00005095987,0.008208662,0.0008855625,0.000027870205,0.00027643534,0.058637694,0.0003658384,0.00074126985,0.16447958,0.76626235,0.000041785494],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.029958742,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.063278764,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029958742,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010701267,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011822861,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07764351},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4206365152","doi":"10.7202/1044712ar","title":"TABLE DE LA JURISPRUDENCE","year":2013,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue du notariat","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"China Scholarship Council; McMaster University; McGill University","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Table (database); Philosophy; Political science; Law; Computer science; Data mining","score_opus":0.018395635138367155,"score_gpt":0.308510109282512,"score_spread":0.2901144741441448,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4206365152","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007055104,0.06656643,0.010109762,0.020268012,0.005786925,0.00022159424,0.016326576,0.0006087577,0.87305677],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.20998886,0.102357864,0.054085877,0.008979231,0.0076787947,0.0010782407,0.0250345,0.001335186,0.5894613],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9941175,0.002262376,0.0004402625,0.0005889852,0.0023363896,0.00025449623],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.986989,0.009174536,0.00047062582,0.0010648054,0.0020930113,0.00020802794],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003906263,0.00077051675,0.0013106021,0.009644167,0.003754707,0.011807393,0.0011808218,0.002159216,0.05621341],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010241755,0.0007404559,0.00088942423,0.011520398,0.0031500177,0.0039794887,0.0009283977,0.0048492076,0.010780483],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011566205,0.000035890964,0.00034641134,0.00057712104,0.000036111865,0.00010559278,0.0005165921,0.00062179257,0.00042878487,0.83450127,0.10721511,0.05549968],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027025808,0.000021253949,0.0011465738,0.00040312487,0.000013912092,0.000108058804,0.00018661097,0.00022606905,0.00037880155,0.028002841,0.9694667,0.00001898841],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.041390385,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021084398,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9437866,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009765294,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009370486,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1880526},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4206534886","doi":"10.7202/1044797ar","title":"TABLE DE LA JURISPRUDENCE","year":2010,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue du notariat","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"China Scholarship Council; Barrick Gold Corporation","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Table (database); Philosophy; Political science; Computer science; Law; Database","score_opus":0.015490844038590254,"score_gpt":0.3252700740360141,"score_spread":0.30977922999742386,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4206534886","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0065392377,0.07108208,0.009904255,0.020311635,0.00617347,0.00022769229,0.015690412,0.0006139411,0.86945724],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.19695522,0.109581105,0.054317906,0.009244106,0.008294823,0.0010878406,0.024599003,0.0013508731,0.59456915],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9940982,0.0022634803,0.0004502037,0.0005846153,0.0023565793,0.0002468819],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98703605,0.009110782,0.00046886705,0.0010744564,0.00209981,0.00021003236],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039605186,0.0007809463,0.0013516414,0.009568568,0.003707457,0.011729688,0.0011996455,0.0021801174,0.056837108],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010174728,0.0007652066,0.0008889079,0.011415841,0.0031139394,0.00400104,0.00092448946,0.0049226275,0.011187992],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000119609176,0.000037300953,0.00033686444,0.0006162155,0.000037335547,0.00010921858,0.00048801172,0.0006595642,0.00045723421,0.82380825,0.114298485,0.05903187],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026191186,0.000021160951,0.0010542287,0.0003842142,0.000013589416,0.000105129155,0.00016109484,0.00021677183,0.00036442134,0.026312858,0.9713221,0.000018161112],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0398266,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020366047,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9431629,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009709333,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009435412,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19013906},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4229487000","doi":"10.21892/9789588557724.3","title":"Tendencias del programa de Derecho","year":2018,"lang":"es","type":"book-chapter","venue":"CORPORACIÓN UNIVERSITARIA DEL CARIBE CECAR eBooks","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Optech (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Doxa; Episteme; Humanities; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.04731101886598166,"score_gpt":0.3019943972225367,"score_spread":0.254683378356555,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4229487000","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019508513,0.004989302,0.017819924,0.021461012,0.0010490268,0.0000980553,0.000096908116,0.00030970605,0.9346676],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.50334096,0.009223768,0.008243815,0.0025462187,0.0009646083,0.0003757045,0.0002484965,0.000905115,0.4741513],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9927563,0.0031682088,0.00016738586,0.00065737276,0.0025290835,0.0007217541],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99023706,0.005348241,0.0006421259,0.0010019677,0.0019616408,0.0008089515],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0047145393,0.00045976407,0.0003191558,0.002988599,0.0051733484,0.009871062,0.0014733206,0.0017273132,0.028137831],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021141853,0.0003356991,0.00028686173,0.0067274487,0.012835774,0.009726023,0.005356153,0.0044608074,0.0030712353],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011602686,0.000016729582,0.00038607095,0.00011806691,0.0000028303418,0.0000644479,0.018023087,0.00012967065,0.00012446113,0.92415506,0.023317602,0.03365037],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008651158,0.000025193613,0.0015738113,0.00041278097,0.000008651043,0.00013566492,0.021555193,0.00044163343,0.0004940408,0.08147938,0.89385086,0.000014154646],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008732171,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010070754,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028137831,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0086124325,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012864347,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09413046},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4232467898","doi":"10.7202/1045720ar","title":"TABLE DE LA JURISPRUDENCE","year":2004,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue du notariat","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Royal Bank of Canada","keywords":"Table (database); Computer science; Database","score_opus":0.02125538920914743,"score_gpt":0.32542550754361244,"score_spread":0.304170118334465,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4232467898","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0064183865,0.0743861,0.010435212,0.021121666,0.0066759884,0.00024017449,0.01610146,0.0006644712,0.8639566],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.18303749,0.11011598,0.056846656,0.009466673,0.008321298,0.0010883242,0.024952197,0.0014048493,0.60476655],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99405104,0.0022443568,0.0004580162,0.0005861168,0.0024103154,0.0002501633],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.987094,0.008959499,0.00048528996,0.0010971464,0.0021399665,0.000224114],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0040042317,0.0007944885,0.0014080717,0.0096938815,0.0037138667,0.011795532,0.0012102817,0.0022721037,0.056957643],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010296461,0.000807059,0.000909955,0.011303279,0.0031032132,0.0040800655,0.0009282261,0.0051236437,0.011714504],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012811014,0.00003887366,0.0003364849,0.0006335163,0.000039316965,0.00011053711,0.0004632456,0.0007077884,0.00048563333,0.81123126,0.1230924,0.06273291],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025744179,0.000021517144,0.0009943068,0.0003682421,0.000013469915,0.00010219844,0.00014495976,0.00021181683,0.0003597332,0.026413634,0.9713262,0.000018196935],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.039760638,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020320447,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.056957643,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009805182,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009452147,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19054234},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4232575241","doi":"10.7202/1045564ar","title":"REVUE DE JURISPRUDENCE EN DROIT DES OBLIGATIONS","year":2008,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue du notariat","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Political science; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.04932970650362369,"score_gpt":0.30979059485408916,"score_spread":0.2604608883504655,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4232575241","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.022902653,0.060879845,0.032096468,0.10110973,0.0031231297,0.000054995762,0.0001538136,0.00008798529,0.7795914],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88871825,0.016236404,0.009672858,0.009671313,0.0034355111,0.00024959492,0.00008990542,0.00021213554,0.071714],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.978362,0.013392971,0.00066876883,0.001819975,0.0042557395,0.0015005912],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9851089,0.011438262,0.0004147959,0.0016575617,0.001099539,0.00028093046],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019421719,0.000879294,0.0024339757,0.0041995132,0.0113184545,0.01644219,0.0034582794,0.015916733,0.007738222],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023298424,0.00093754556,0.0012710904,0.0041566305,0.071875215,0.017068917,0.0054102736,0.019653786,0.0010381443],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000013084745,0.0000019860045,0.0000063933967,0.000006568486,0.0000011823065,0.0000075482562,0.0003876527,0.000027379472,0.000009426174,0.998629,0.00048787572,0.00043384064],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013770853,0.0000073218725,0.00013694965,0.0001591622,0.000005059809,0.00006566574,0.00070034404,0.00019441167,0.000090811125,0.90412605,0.09448859,0.000011953421],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021226019,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012957902,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021226019,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.021002654,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0118251955,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15238559},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4235274469","doi":"10.2307/j.ctv103xc7v.13","title":"LOS INTENTOS POR LOGRAR LA INCORPORACIÓN DE QUEBEC EN EL CONSENSO CONSTITUCIONAL:","year":2020,"lang":"es","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Dykinson eBooks","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.03943652279073629,"score_gpt":0.34433756017618916,"score_spread":0.3049010373854529,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4235274469","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11580371,0.008080618,0.001822527,0.040233344,0.0005440874,0.00008215637,0.00022247859,0.00003884062,0.83317214],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5944621,0.0031664679,0.00092525344,0.006966432,0.00007221639,0.00007060555,0.00006849351,0.00003790682,0.39423054],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.998823,0.00027612172,0.000018479606,0.00010505957,0.00030621074,0.00047110795],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994537,0.0001689623,0.00003359045,0.00003860188,0.00020047172,0.00010454124],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016879338,0.0002455923,0.0001845898,0.0009497581,0.012351028,0.0073926602,0.0009500241,0.0031834384,0.007810045],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002127472,0.00027551124,0.00018000396,0.0019293625,0.0068349447,0.0028374877,0.0021246062,0.0032567808,0.00038194892],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031524374,0.00002842926,0.0027040734,0.000054093354,0.000006663442,0.00027720066,0.04012307,0.00012276985,0.00033438698,0.88721275,0.039393943,0.029711105],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014660228,0.00002779559,0.00998905,0.00032721876,0.000029616538,0.00010988966,0.0425794,0.0002528751,0.000846914,0.021957623,0.9238297,0.000035311128],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9300255,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.982141,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06997448,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.027877498,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.045839846,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20226634},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4235934855","doi":"10.7202/1043608ar","title":"TABLE DE LA JURISPRUDENCE","year":2015,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue du notariat","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"China Scholarship Council","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Table (database); Political science; Law; Computer science; Data mining","score_opus":0.055535715237667836,"score_gpt":0.3544230507346927,"score_spread":0.2988873354970249,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4235934855","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0071856813,0.06531869,0.009858024,0.019713832,0.005476393,0.0002208535,0.017366696,0.00061518035,0.8742448],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.21405338,0.10250378,0.0530848,0.008858932,0.0074721123,0.0010749139,0.026698958,0.0013498676,0.5849032],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.994292,0.002180993,0.0004310789,0.0005778902,0.0022683043,0.00024969567],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98657703,0.009507522,0.0004883344,0.0010861006,0.002129524,0.00021147811],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037866824,0.00074982404,0.0012690496,0.009785677,0.0036287953,0.011441906,0.0011441648,0.0020563046,0.057578247],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010386844,0.0007135651,0.00086378265,0.011797511,0.0030219723,0.0038350278,0.00091590564,0.0046492983,0.010953149],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000120458215,0.000036409223,0.00038249572,0.00061691983,0.000037907797,0.000108720466,0.000545002,0.0006457481,0.00044764872,0.82355833,0.11447955,0.059020802],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026198784,0.000020748123,0.0012027523,0.0004088323,0.00001376816,0.000107165964,0.00018995484,0.00021954245,0.00037448676,0.026397817,0.97102034,0.00001839525],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.040177934,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020744953,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94242173,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0093925595,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009054686,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19261843},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4240002370","doi":"10.7202/1069819ar","title":"TABLE DE LA JURISPRUDENCE","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue du notariat","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Samsung; Hydro-Québec; Autorité des Marchés Financiers; Parks Canada; Shell Canada; Mozilla Foundation; China Scholarship Council; Bombardier; Curtin University of Technology; University of Pennsylvania","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Table (database); Political science; Law; Computer science; Database","score_opus":0.015007255057697387,"score_gpt":0.31191293048508956,"score_spread":0.29690567542739216,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4240002370","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006022699,0.061389126,0.008623396,0.0172738,0.005566284,0.00022283061,0.01419397,0.00056926545,0.8861386],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.18357106,0.09395312,0.047948457,0.0083678,0.007381139,0.0010622228,0.022720601,0.0012835343,0.6337122],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9939746,0.0023198451,0.00045053576,0.0005978154,0.0024039415,0.00025330856],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9873548,0.008822886,0.00044917266,0.0010712274,0.0020984216,0.00020352367],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039111325,0.00076867413,0.0013075056,0.009466369,0.003781773,0.011773604,0.0011692095,0.0021727497,0.059710898],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0098984,0.00075094815,0.0008799223,0.01101017,0.0030132055,0.0038187199,0.0009355092,0.0049308655,0.012154742],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000119682656,0.000039712108,0.00033503724,0.000591176,0.00003603687,0.00011201545,0.0005077554,0.0006271883,0.0004614937,0.8244008,0.11417166,0.058597352],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024950974,0.000020552943,0.0009984956,0.00035670117,0.000012332748,0.000100170735,0.00015499572,0.00019845215,0.00034454366,0.02403859,0.97373307,0.00001721191],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04165766,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021092696,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.059710898,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009770774,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00964317,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19975281},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4240167526","doi":"10.7202/1061835ar","title":"TABLE DE LA JURISPRUDENCE","year":2018,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue du notariat","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"AstraZeneca (Canada)","funders":"Mozilla Foundation; China Scholarship Council; Enerkem","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Table (database); Political science; Computer science; Law; Database","score_opus":0.024994561763833016,"score_gpt":0.344840302799438,"score_spread":0.319845741035605,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4240167526","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008402312,0.055806432,0.009072948,0.016727874,0.0045337533,0.00022296983,0.020087926,0.0006023562,0.8845435],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.23998392,0.09059517,0.049358718,0.0075875744,0.006113926,0.0010662922,0.030796017,0.0013390176,0.57315934],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99464285,0.0020512207,0.0003966171,0.00053944835,0.002124783,0.00024503854],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9861649,0.009906313,0.000500093,0.0010692406,0.0021463528,0.00021297157],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00345941,0.0006905582,0.0011789274,0.009892364,0.003543017,0.010533047,0.0010620786,0.0018053607,0.060116656],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010425665,0.00063975336,0.00078948366,0.012458643,0.002764133,0.0035501367,0.00086937565,0.004102126,0.010440104],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013507444,0.00003935917,0.000505562,0.000675938,0.000040747676,0.00011863685,0.0006733644,0.00067156774,0.00048667993,0.8121594,0.121588565,0.062905066],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002623194,0.000021012285,0.0015597169,0.00041962598,0.000014381184,0.00011238355,0.00024204665,0.00022052704,0.0003912484,0.02439151,0.972583,0.000018240129],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04149577,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022126233,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93988335,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008832014,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0084879715,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20111024},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4243864889","doi":"10.47623/ivap-rvap.82.2008.2.07","title":"Derechos fundamentales en el sistema constitucional canadiense: entre la Carta constitucional y los códigos provinciale","year":2008,"lang":"eu","type":"article","venue":"DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Derecho; Philosophy","score_opus":0.25667961312747356,"score_gpt":0.5644755498180939,"score_spread":0.30779593669062033,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4243864889","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.070568696,0.0046803937,0.0065808846,0.016773779,0.0001921853,0.00008780184,0.00038943457,0.00009165444,0.9006352],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9120354,0.002185572,0.0035434256,0.0009026635,0.00008815486,0.000055482997,0.00018244646,0.00006579413,0.08094103],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964437,0.00054164353,0.000094428506,0.00043000732,0.0014873338,0.00100288],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976357,0.00067520683,0.00013683805,0.00019501057,0.0010686824,0.00028847394],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030096422,0.00033674517,0.00040425517,0.0030989,0.014400184,0.014706218,0.0012509277,0.0015133454,0.0059865187],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0048557143,0.00036926565,0.00032591738,0.005901665,0.02889466,0.003509772,0.002933851,0.0032746177,0.00039383624],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005085017,0.0000018467821,0.0004619118,0.00001405256,0.0000014863475,0.000023068395,0.008800442,0.00007587409,0.00007117054,0.9841217,0.0018127842,0.004610453],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024823454,0.000013908809,0.0105632525,0.00025010025,0.000037723854,0.00010947703,0.025421897,0.0008035102,0.00046553102,0.26891896,0.693344,0.00004680156],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9348131,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96231717,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1014397,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1014397,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1007356,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.73599994},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4246970040","doi":"10.7202/1045641ar","title":"TABLE DE LA JURISPRUDENCE","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue du notariat","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"China Scholarship Council; Fraternal Order of Eagles","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Table (database); Political science; Philosophy; Law; Computer science; Data mining","score_opus":0.021085988014077472,"score_gpt":0.3311181194447752,"score_spread":0.31003213143069774,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4246970040","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0063558193,0.071424924,0.010514381,0.020458156,0.0065766703,0.0002430776,0.016991762,0.0006754114,0.8667598],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.18113531,0.10722532,0.056945853,0.009231613,0.008208484,0.0011072201,0.025798291,0.001410437,0.60893744],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9941717,0.002188736,0.00045035378,0.0005774137,0.0023675147,0.0002442465],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98740923,0.00872694,0.0004734436,0.0010724853,0.0021024535,0.00021545205],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003914993,0.0008016675,0.0014009072,0.009665843,0.003679507,0.011803506,0.0012105048,0.0022371567,0.058617886],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01008484,0.0008021775,0.00091425335,0.01125537,0.0030301185,0.004046563,0.0009161867,0.0050479835,0.012174716],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001268537,0.000038811988,0.00033703836,0.0006326253,0.00003911744,0.000110577515,0.00046009463,0.0007007461,0.00048409912,0.80928034,0.12561817,0.06217164],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026338908,0.0000214192,0.0009958902,0.00037241567,0.000013384263,0.00010310929,0.00014668684,0.00021557271,0.00036148183,0.026185026,0.9715403,0.00001837546],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.039545037,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020093799,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9413821,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009658524,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009358967,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19609636},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4249310468","doi":"10.7202/1045334ar","title":"TABLE DE LA JURISPRUDENCE","year":2008,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue du notariat","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"China Scholarship Council","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Table (database); Philosophy; Political science; Law; Computer science; Data mining","score_opus":0.0363247591356911,"score_gpt":0.32201735261452197,"score_spread":0.28569259347883086,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4249310468","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006410925,0.071674794,0.010209504,0.020849835,0.0064511243,0.00022993979,0.01565582,0.00062543043,0.8678927],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.18938968,0.10836892,0.054805376,0.009397505,0.008265404,0.0010830587,0.024245856,0.0013574518,0.60308677],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99417007,0.0022202889,0.00044493904,0.00058112905,0.00233695,0.00024662228],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9875453,0.008694535,0.00045896415,0.0010539346,0.002039081,0.00020814061],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039364225,0.0007858059,0.001382228,0.009478081,0.0037189885,0.011760817,0.0012108795,0.0022404545,0.0570778],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009975283,0.0007788193,0.00090039393,0.01126524,0.00313165,0.0040505235,0.0009299106,0.0050445385,0.011416509],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011642725,0.000036189453,0.00032130966,0.0005893242,0.000036193454,0.00010467212,0.00046440595,0.00064425304,0.00044077056,0.8257742,0.11433505,0.05713722],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025759644,0.000020862763,0.0010051922,0.0003756938,0.000013268086,0.00010331851,0.00015596465,0.00021503342,0.0003564363,0.027501086,0.9702093,0.000018201026],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.039599705,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020124242,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0570778,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009706203,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009370061,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19094425},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4251654352","doi":"10.7202/1043524ar","title":"TABLE DE LA JURISPRUDENCE","year":2016,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue du notariat","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"China Scholarship Council","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Philosophy; Political science; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.022291547419637306,"score_gpt":0.3221360226563859,"score_spread":0.2998444752367486,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4251654352","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007561964,0.06105538,0.009777452,0.018595591,0.0051293736,0.00022370384,0.018156407,0.0006119407,0.8788881],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.22244185,0.09788315,0.053356774,0.0083212415,0.0070388,0.0010725087,0.027799519,0.001345917,0.5807402],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99431473,0.0021687618,0.0004244195,0.00056953554,0.0022719023,0.0002505898],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98672915,0.009399204,0.00048906734,0.0010644606,0.0021080915,0.00020999667],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003676428,0.0007407692,0.0012559795,0.009754714,0.0036000488,0.011297492,0.0011203496,0.0019903062,0.058217026],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010315624,0.0006956729,0.00085437327,0.011837086,0.0029264023,0.0037746604,0.0008942105,0.004508553,0.010830192],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012516812,0.000037441157,0.00041884626,0.0006262675,0.00003966366,0.00011096696,0.0005621316,0.0006702038,0.00045936034,0.82182133,0.11410086,0.061027836],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002694123,0.000021463082,0.0013233953,0.00040854805,0.00001428937,0.00010974242,0.00019938756,0.00023024846,0.00038560168,0.026391031,0.97087055,0.000018759036],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04103154,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021225026,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.058217026,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009234871,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008935734,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19475532},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4283020440","doi":"10.22201/cisan.24487228e.2022.2.526","title":"La gobernanza de la British Columbia Assembly of First Nations: una estrategia para salir de la Ley India","year":2022,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Norteamérica","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Art","score_opus":0.0179012092521432,"score_gpt":0.3402953360641047,"score_spread":0.3223941268119615,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4283020440","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.28039947,0.004011281,0.0015247628,0.03357601,0.00022153188,0.000092035756,0.0004377923,0.00007026555,0.6796669],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9330595,0.0009654981,0.0006786358,0.0020974244,0.0000262361,0.00004573153,0.00008822695,0.000023336828,0.063015394],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971174,0.0007849051,0.00005411697,0.00023673211,0.000641709,0.0011651074],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997693,0.00081024715,0.00019501786,0.00018800152,0.0005831038,0.00053058594],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021841468,0.0002466572,0.0001647161,0.0016714337,0.009991689,0.008304886,0.00084584166,0.0011904712,0.008628375],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004298743,0.00025209587,0.0001315817,0.0027853225,0.009149067,0.001243364,0.0026052573,0.002736333,0.0003936827],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000058775604,0.0000307596,0.016378658,0.00011776997,0.0000148727395,0.00046922296,0.04425034,0.00043114755,0.001057126,0.8769644,0.023310214,0.03691672],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000036141442,0.000051032683,0.101821125,0.0006380716,0.0000517452,0.0001692873,0.101544835,0.0005816241,0.0017072532,0.03507987,0.75818795,0.00013112822],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.80914557,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9441443,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19085443,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.027847432,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05880801,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3839568},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4285722593","doi":"10.7202/1088130ar","title":"L’importance des peuples autochtones et afro-descendants dans la construction de la notion de communauté en droit colombien","year":2020,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue de droit Université de Sherbrooke","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.021938771096193455,"score_gpt":0.27541662488609214,"score_spread":0.2534778537898987,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4285722593","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6824589,0.005203288,0.0036443926,0.0069447705,0.00016959097,0.00007604655,0.00013502211,0.000026108513,0.30134183],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98532003,0.0007073913,0.0006073061,0.00024280246,0.000022890055,0.000023089835,0.000023306819,0.0000107369715,0.013042336],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99898297,0.00031837626,0.00003107178,0.00018015831,0.00018212905,0.00030532482],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993051,0.00025642753,0.00010051727,0.00006240717,0.000105935884,0.0001695704],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014117984,0.0003401168,0.00024521514,0.0009591541,0.005915772,0.003731525,0.0005668873,0.0009705362,0.005458133],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013281128,0.00019366875,0.00016891025,0.001198117,0.018500792,0.0016848816,0.0032264306,0.0017549569,0.00023264666],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000074708245,0.00001042405,0.01288395,0.00014107782,0.000014115351,0.0009897938,0.41393808,0.00012947325,0.0033061523,0.5511705,0.0009815018,0.016360305],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003790394,0.00011416532,0.1593161,0.00080351345,0.000042798565,0.0013719196,0.27991986,0.00050419726,0.0014123804,0.050484713,0.5058332,0.00015925756],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.19288519,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.29293308,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19288519,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008574405,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0050245603,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38352495},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4287731372","doi":"10.11144/javeriana.10554.41009","title":"Las mutaciones dentro de la constitución política de Colombia de 1991","year":2020,"lang":"es","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Optech (Canada)","funders":"United Nations","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.018412159573627088,"score_gpt":0.38348953181268425,"score_spread":0.3650773722390572,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4287731372","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5540048,0.009871098,0.000552649,0.013302393,0.00015276691,0.000078831006,0.0013323199,0.000044577635,0.4206606],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94611216,0.0019428987,0.00020412,0.00030205704,0.000028099701,0.000032563723,0.0002626047,0.000013547925,0.051101927],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99849975,0.0003508884,0.000056924266,0.00020497691,0.000298046,0.00058945455],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985374,0.00055474974,0.00032077578,0.00007298894,0.0003316031,0.00018243626],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011122079,0.00024725834,0.00028831876,0.002109696,0.0071249832,0.0057224846,0.00046625698,0.0009049437,0.012322171],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004105503,0.00020149347,0.00011570367,0.0035554946,0.0029939248,0.001754263,0.0015538987,0.0014819864,0.00050433713],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00039432876,0.00007671799,0.054727033,0.0006892679,0.00003814124,0.0011445329,0.19581774,0.00084473414,0.00179746,0.53560865,0.04861141,0.16025007],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001822608,0.000043338758,0.2827378,0.00027698107,0.00003750939,0.00014170444,0.10431276,0.00034989516,0.0009824561,0.007606907,0.6034461,0.00004625444],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.47177625,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.74548453,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47177625,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02738299,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0071676597,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9380604},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4287732392","doi":"10.11144/javeriana.10554.50851","title":"El dilema de la nulidad de las sentencias de la Corte Constitucional en sede de revisión de tutela","year":2020,"lang":"es","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Optech (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Derecho; Political science","score_opus":0.016036867668256592,"score_gpt":0.38989209339844744,"score_spread":0.37385522573019087,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4287732392","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11744517,0.012584199,0.019067917,0.04237155,0.0025816273,0.00012055637,0.00019979561,0.00023033381,0.8053988],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.77837104,0.0034029474,0.0044885906,0.0035844573,0.00071326207,0.00011213608,0.00013209584,0.0002527681,0.20894265],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9955571,0.0018148932,0.00013368655,0.0006797835,0.0010831633,0.00073135697],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960699,0.0012240778,0.00037489744,0.00058588176,0.0012332019,0.0005120694],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0050383816,0.0005037414,0.00031807867,0.0015047244,0.008020147,0.011572731,0.0009601809,0.001875606,0.0102626765],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006644367,0.00028513736,0.00039126014,0.0014935775,0.015698249,0.005850809,0.004516811,0.003816245,0.0013228385],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038294333,0.000015732743,0.002362943,0.0000905546,0.000010160002,0.00014422706,0.055368435,0.00014862364,0.0007890791,0.8899626,0.016910523,0.03415882],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007498688,0.00003441753,0.004081936,0.00030555195,0.000011341344,0.00012683723,0.01787591,0.00017252444,0.0005168115,0.041282665,0.9355586,0.000025855981],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.031291813,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.063672364,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.031291813,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010322422,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010984052,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.074894786},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4289782184","doi":"10.21017/rev.repub.2022.v32.a125","title":"EL DERECHO NATURAL EN LA CONSTITUCIÓN POLÍTICA DE COLOMBIA, UNA VISIÓN DESDE LOS POSTULADOS DE JAVIER HERVADA","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revista Republicana","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Optech (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Constitution; Dialogical self; Argumentative; Epistemology; Humanities; Natural (archaeology); Politics; Philosophy; Legal positivism; Political science; Law; Philosophy of law; Sociology; Comparative law; Geography","score_opus":0.014967396066036474,"score_gpt":0.3648676905595998,"score_spread":0.3499002944935633,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4289782184","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12639196,0.13598037,0.004530615,0.091465816,0.004608038,0.00010438894,0.0007253586,0.00032537148,0.6358681],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9207926,0.015681308,0.0021089392,0.0020170521,0.00056110823,0.000090774265,0.00016478139,0.0000568473,0.058526564],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989489,0.00042145842,0.000031007432,0.00017472841,0.000232491,0.00019151767],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993443,0.0002730509,0.00007825635,0.00003082237,0.00014956076,0.00012402677],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011037398,0.00061700953,0.00038435563,0.0014101879,0.006634529,0.008332275,0.00047004793,0.001838794,0.0051704305],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022491384,0.00017276766,0.00023085246,0.0009649516,0.0050351648,0.0026695556,0.001553778,0.0023182363,0.0003154877],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001431507,0.000041240375,0.0025737102,0.000710069,0.000010974661,0.0008257615,0.04999897,0.00081126887,0.0014847838,0.82565016,0.05231214,0.06543781],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015566822,0.000020558828,0.006318564,0.00034188907,0.00001689537,0.00022977557,0.02428273,0.00034796476,0.00026159492,0.015152851,0.9529727,0.00003892112],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.23436181,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.37168744,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23436181,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017618267,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010049641,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.46599537},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4293228088","doi":"10.31672/60.4","title":"LA HUMANIZACIÓN DEL DERECHO INTERNACIONAL PÚBLICO Y DEL DERECHO INTERNACIONAL PRIVADO","year":2022,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"revista de derecho público","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Optech (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Derecho; International law; Normative; Order (exchange); Law; Conflict of laws; Political science; Private law; Human rights; Humanities; Public law; Philosophy; Economics","score_opus":0.03694159231555253,"score_gpt":0.3590153476992917,"score_spread":0.32207375538373917,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4293228088","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.053082157,0.005938128,0.01629313,0.052200343,0.0005861605,0.00003184501,0.000080094236,0.00006517574,0.87172294],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9571656,0.0021478678,0.0013585226,0.0025342738,0.00043418774,0.000051920117,0.000038048725,0.000043217275,0.036226287],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99043465,0.0055973562,0.0001694066,0.0008424266,0.00166524,0.001290863],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9915426,0.0051581357,0.0008071164,0.0011458425,0.0007401249,0.00060618186],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008563074,0.00025973137,0.00037057907,0.001332147,0.003917026,0.014700692,0.0009973628,0.003465768,0.008469924],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009689936,0.00027027243,0.0003225475,0.0019954408,0.05490321,0.008469284,0.0048258887,0.004494845,0.00052711024],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000022842623,0.0000025650193,0.00011171489,0.00000694839,6.502329e-7,0.000005165959,0.0012447328,0.000035691857,0.000027469623,0.9970901,0.00047152,0.0010010656],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019453466,0.000041116822,0.0035584376,0.0002718934,0.000009401663,0.00012153477,0.016988277,0.00040813014,0.00045955586,0.7371297,0.24097158,0.000020906897],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010406791,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013233983,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014700692,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0078079654,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011736705,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.056651056},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4297862563","doi":"10.56657/2.1.1","title":"La Significatividad de las Cuestiones del Significado","year":2022,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Elenkhos - Revista de la Sociedad Filosófica del Uruguay","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Medicine","score_opus":0.02170424297295202,"score_gpt":0.342018118231643,"score_spread":0.320313875258691,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4297862563","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6074758,0.002938708,0.017275885,0.015823252,0.00043793052,0.00006690076,0.0015160912,0.0003721694,0.35409325],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99257374,0.0004378855,0.0009811113,0.00025520156,0.0000548761,0.000022093727,0.00015013649,0.000048741716,0.0054761255],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973092,0.0009910737,0.00012565336,0.0004798302,0.0008459021,0.0002483873],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9887623,0.007913632,0.0011694776,0.00066626753,0.0012115948,0.00027672137],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017061967,0.00051789975,0.00026541014,0.0013777666,0.0012063277,0.0048865187,0.00060515647,0.0010458322,0.027709953],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018712424,0.00023767968,0.00036575037,0.0015388789,0.0047297026,0.004104127,0.0033585394,0.0018763426,0.0015931323],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012444967,0.00020446973,0.05519021,0.0021983627,0.0002566149,0.0012061282,0.0882937,0.0015542225,0.013819789,0.68640757,0.0128141865,0.13681027],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018125502,0.0004395855,0.21989264,0.0014642975,0.00044811063,0.0014010539,0.085496776,0.0023134605,0.013962781,0.5111452,0.16299899,0.00025588082],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003160443,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002204963,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027709953,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017043588,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017323128,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09269905},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4307237984","doi":"10.26443/glsars.v2i1.190","title":"Legal Pluralism, Transitional Justice, and Ethnic Justice Systems","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill GLSA Research Series","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"International Labour Organization","keywords":"Legal pluralism; Jurisdiction; Indigenous; Political science; Law; Tribunal; Transitional justice; Pluralism (philosophy); Ethnic group; Redress; Sociology; Economic Justice; Legal profession; Legal realism","score_opus":0.19161802353145188,"score_gpt":0.4600137222489433,"score_spread":0.26839569871749147,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4307237984","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23626101,0.011411046,0.0064293854,0.0346122,0.0002055944,0.00007449141,0.00006563645,0.000059276954,0.7108814],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9934835,0.0005679225,0.00059614226,0.00059241,0.000043297146,0.000016470362,0.000009081705,0.0000063048387,0.004684776],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9950092,0.002244825,0.00016220141,0.0006410567,0.00050224684,0.0014405975],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971058,0.00089051254,0.0006381162,0.00020671662,0.0003407528,0.0008181315],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003488279,0.0002485396,0.00026636102,0.0017384074,0.0175676,0.011893814,0.0010076377,0.0017413109,0.0050252085],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0042692074,0.0001513776,0.00020505322,0.0011306028,0.03992121,0.004998384,0.0077460064,0.0024190133,0.00016955248],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008131483,0.000013247755,0.0017823821,0.00004080242,0.0000036612582,0.00020002855,0.024753822,0.00020973971,0.000088655455,0.96415484,0.00118731,0.007557427],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000036333207,0.000051141084,0.021411516,0.00065201614,0.000024665416,0.00037054394,0.12348143,0.0014327827,0.0003364183,0.63066804,0.22144097,0.00009413688],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10001251,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12805688,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10001251,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01837453,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010939798,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19886076},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4312258376","doi":"10.18041/0124-0021/dialogos.53.2020.9186","title":"El dilema democrático de la refrendación directa de los acuerdos de paz","year":2020,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Diálogos de saberes","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy; Physics","score_opus":0.027974912445485268,"score_gpt":0.3877296736695975,"score_spread":0.3597547612241122,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4312258376","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12709166,0.0028241784,0.013608367,0.04646294,0.0004992407,0.000107177715,0.0001244339,0.00011457519,0.80916744],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9202631,0.0010752364,0.0017897002,0.0025899224,0.00020762646,0.00006371527,0.000048961192,0.000055169166,0.07390655],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99126667,0.004378101,0.00021324544,0.00092667155,0.0018480666,0.0013671881],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99423754,0.0017634963,0.000912323,0.0007524918,0.0011941269,0.0011400569],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0043845926,0.000466235,0.00046037146,0.0015162339,0.009519999,0.0118014375,0.0010797791,0.0025534302,0.017389167],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0102041885,0.00030972486,0.00049553264,0.0016714003,0.016063357,0.0058406917,0.008479568,0.005413289,0.002070621],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034326116,0.000045284643,0.003680285,0.00006740048,0.0000131505985,0.00021314273,0.025543807,0.00022014992,0.00034308757,0.94686043,0.006195054,0.016783932],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003761404,0.00010394389,0.012942872,0.0004694996,0.000036457823,0.00043672248,0.047018435,0.00080482435,0.0010001025,0.28702053,0.6500625,0.00006657028],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011665237,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019297628,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017389167,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0083330665,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009869398,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.060460925},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4313887162","doi":"10.4067/s0718-52002022000200071","title":"¿Cómo Conciliar la Libertad Religiosa con las Normas Antidiscriminación? Tres Mecanismos y sus Fundamentos en el Sistema Jurídico Chileno","year":2022,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Estudios constitucionales","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Discovery Air (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Physics","score_opus":0.021046541034752852,"score_gpt":0.33317637540940637,"score_spread":0.3121298343746535,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4313887162","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3085223,0.009751552,0.0051990114,0.15703805,0.0004139141,0.00010626402,0.00023316889,0.00003297156,0.5187027],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97481245,0.0015977721,0.0007192574,0.0032243503,0.0001466177,0.000071291244,0.00003965228,0.000019413106,0.019369077],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9928861,0.0037453813,0.00025810176,0.0006198812,0.0014956879,0.0009946858],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9928739,0.0025293168,0.0014537158,0.0010172147,0.0013597526,0.00076619943],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008669701,0.00021379498,0.00038716654,0.0015044177,0.0048414357,0.010174949,0.0012717121,0.0017661167,0.006048832],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014166185,0.0002697195,0.00022110227,0.0022076378,0.03185093,0.0062267426,0.00590766,0.0037501473,0.000465765],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017416338,0.00002129353,0.005033235,0.000097030264,0.000009033625,0.000074111085,0.017877594,0.00006845043,0.00017390904,0.9660832,0.0023083708,0.008236195],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011370779,0.000096379124,0.03422352,0.001101994,0.000047582987,0.00021149134,0.105897576,0.0005303719,0.001541098,0.44210547,0.41405094,0.0000798979],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.047224797,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06813151,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.047224797,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012965692,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02268937,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09407312},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4320162470","doi":"10.7202/1095691ar","title":"TABLE DE LA JURISPRUDENCE","year":2021,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue du notariat","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Table (database); Political science; Philosophy; Computer science; Law; Data mining","score_opus":0.024052541106897293,"score_gpt":0.3323852070102007,"score_spread":0.3083326659033034,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4320162470","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005933816,0.06650207,0.008551299,0.018040743,0.0059128725,0.0002208868,0.013894517,0.0005626938,0.88038105],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.17961523,0.100567244,0.04753386,0.008628634,0.007638359,0.0010678179,0.022435991,0.0012747583,0.6312381],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99380684,0.0024065597,0.00046799605,0.0006117252,0.0024472952,0.00025967],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98679245,0.0092606805,0.00045430445,0.0010889454,0.0021911964,0.00021249459],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0040672123,0.00078476506,0.0013452601,0.009461005,0.003812965,0.011993878,0.001196844,0.002225204,0.059013203],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010113308,0.00077403296,0.0009038036,0.011033148,0.0030671852,0.0039038719,0.00094179995,0.0050523295,0.012163419],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011822302,0.000039646493,0.00033551623,0.00061202416,0.000036801364,0.000113481976,0.0004988771,0.00063696696,0.00045212585,0.8231831,0.11539014,0.05858308],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025059033,0.00002072899,0.0009852344,0.0003650438,0.0000126754885,0.00009924821,0.00015235506,0.00020029655,0.00034092506,0.024264032,0.9735171,0.000017223168],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0429057,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021629026,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9409868,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010033605,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010076679,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19741881},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4320514247","doi":"10.17118/11143/19152","title":"L’importance des peuples autochtones et afro-descendants dans la construction de la notion de communauté en droit colombien","year":2021,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue de droit Université de Sherbrooke","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Parks and Wilderness Society","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.017418781850468794,"score_gpt":0.2786432881529214,"score_spread":0.2612245063024526,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4320514247","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.28976429,0.02287479,0.005741303,0.014014701,0.0004034383,0.000103798,0.00018262168,0.000057317342,0.6668577],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98572034,0.0014259407,0.0008387431,0.00028489318,0.00005472396,0.000030432662,0.00001997542,0.000011597901,0.011613299],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99836797,0.0006026854,0.000052144842,0.00029207498,0.0003153437,0.0003697766],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985788,0.00086597237,0.00013142213,0.00012970646,0.00016590879,0.00012813054],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017126235,0.00034312936,0.00032835192,0.0012680932,0.0053664693,0.0064659705,0.0005711567,0.00157449,0.0031994495],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025188974,0.00019313507,0.00015645663,0.0009969842,0.024562132,0.0022305832,0.002103531,0.0020377259,0.00012193018],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002708734,0.0000056388494,0.0023614692,0.000103826,0.000004499925,0.00032004947,0.10060652,0.000093070266,0.00088899065,0.8817703,0.0008042598,0.0130142],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003615927,0.000066060915,0.047663435,0.000613218,0.000032825446,0.001252299,0.07402809,0.00054771145,0.0012357285,0.08094235,0.7934398,0.00014233304],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.18650411,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.29819936,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18650411,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011533454,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005122604,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3708371},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4323519087","doi":"10.17118/11143/19916","title":"Quelques réflexions sur la constitutionnalisation du droit et le constitutionnalisme au sein de l’État","year":2022,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue de droit Université de Sherbrooke","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Political science; Humanities; Art","score_opus":0.023276432318642137,"score_gpt":0.26888342814857263,"score_spread":0.2456069958299305,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4323519087","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06976774,0.019912383,0.010887191,0.29629487,0.0026048783,0.00004242059,0.00016285964,0.000047366655,0.6002802],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89074403,0.004082088,0.0018829707,0.01474098,0.00096582336,0.00006532177,0.000055149685,0.00007352875,0.08739012],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98988086,0.0050201397,0.00030856061,0.0014631728,0.0019790968,0.0013480614],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9910704,0.0055265836,0.0005859112,0.001108039,0.0012670881,0.0004419911],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012958372,0.0004534048,0.0006428212,0.0017083676,0.010815862,0.014015423,0.0016077451,0.0072357086,0.01636745],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016679322,0.00045504625,0.00055031804,0.0023667486,0.06358041,0.012803206,0.005859172,0.011101165,0.00089019455],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000073300316,0.0000031226193,0.000067125,0.000013536037,0.0000023995235,0.00001863212,0.0040586526,0.00002570622,0.000046390225,0.9932059,0.0014880287,0.0010633087],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008718804,0.0000267073,0.0019300127,0.00032546968,0.00001894391,0.0001514196,0.01988788,0.00015377054,0.0009774748,0.6236745,0.35271397,0.000052625288],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.050028402,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.061016608,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.050028402,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018658489,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01268052,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13537747},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4360609899","doi":"10.38116/9786556350486cap1","title":"DEMASIADO CONOCIDO PARA IGNORARLO, DEMASIADO NUEVO PARA RECONOCERLO: LA CONDICIÓN DEL DERECHO HUMANO AL AGUA A NIVEL MUNDIA","year":2023,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Livros","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Optech (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.08318372939461795,"score_gpt":0.4015641302636914,"score_spread":0.3183804008690735,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4360609899","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23633806,0.008421913,0.009770093,0.09867375,0.00037510644,0.000053066713,0.000042124444,0.00005990232,0.6462659],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98717576,0.00047999938,0.0007439812,0.0017880513,0.00006256978,0.000023359047,0.000005756587,0.000023531029,0.009696971],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9876578,0.006853853,0.00044784442,0.0013776127,0.0022570095,0.0014058726],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9840417,0.011326205,0.0010285445,0.0018219238,0.0011385318,0.00064301107],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015003574,0.0002739877,0.000586983,0.0017787428,0.015496815,0.016089778,0.0018538013,0.007925286,0.0044015544],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026452504,0.0005128962,0.00027060686,0.001812972,0.09941035,0.011432256,0.007499627,0.010050765,0.0002726413],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005773628,0.0000063291695,0.00020461199,0.000014989969,0.0000014612963,0.00003468094,0.024420477,0.00001574652,0.000085403226,0.97298425,0.0004779438,0.0017482749],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000039927945,0.000046764628,0.003187567,0.00033346628,0.000028315639,0.00025276307,0.10683282,0.00026939277,0.0010034473,0.74804544,0.13991793,0.00004222443],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.025601678,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0414281,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025601678,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007867642,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014313782,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07934743},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4372055443","doi":"10.18800/9789972428883.010","title":"Notas personales sobre el doctor Fernando de Trazegnies Granda","year":2009,"lang":"es","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Encana (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Art; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04774778595040031,"score_gpt":0.35378055830032873,"score_spread":0.30603277234992843,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4372055443","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01757346,0.059505273,0.00053842255,0.740424,0.028892126,0.00003711652,0.00022664574,0.000117978205,0.15268503],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.101398945,0.028274711,0.000599162,0.0905424,0.009484814,0.00004560704,0.00007301104,0.00017911648,0.76940215],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981641,0.0006268131,0.000044329514,0.00035352987,0.00043142214,0.00037973368],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99789584,0.00057290803,0.00014456072,0.00008070084,0.0003307854,0.000975204],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014442627,0.0005350393,0.0004704193,0.00075540564,0.011817725,0.003307947,0.00069671747,0.0033605637,0.035336748],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003718132,0.0004029376,0.00027628746,0.0007439368,0.0042549446,0.002457065,0.0029480178,0.008000125,0.008022138],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000060794402,0.000057859364,0.0014882896,0.00013964262,0.0000067306582,0.0006975639,0.017857822,0.000056474226,0.00056062563,0.024956733,0.9223005,0.03181707],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000018429075,0.000012277318,0.0007935369,0.000073754454,0.0000014765717,0.0002253486,0.0034785639,0.000011770511,0.00006375426,0.00050099986,0.99482876,0.000007892014],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.035392735,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09017564,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.035392735,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004601925,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006601225,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11821324},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4376461794","doi":"10.7764/r.483.4","title":"El Congreso Nacional y la interpretación constitucional en el proceso legislativo: criterios y momentos","year":2022,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Revista Chilena de Derecho","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.01675891498004329,"score_gpt":0.3616723546161334,"score_spread":0.3449134396360901,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4376461794","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.031245967,0.0050114305,0.011629527,0.03894548,0.0006602514,0.000063126994,0.00016613328,0.000048123242,0.91223],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8218902,0.002960249,0.0065937005,0.0051009003,0.00032881496,0.00021787462,0.00018833192,0.00016678937,0.16255312],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99018097,0.0059635383,0.00022145043,0.0009485102,0.0017401573,0.0009454514],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968144,0.00128112,0.00035983927,0.00038700757,0.0007270783,0.00043050898],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005589959,0.00039305008,0.00031344665,0.0010847802,0.008070332,0.009944589,0.0012951487,0.0029441381,0.011848503],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006723136,0.0002434781,0.000461984,0.0012995407,0.02058197,0.0050988332,0.0044360915,0.005046599,0.0012949605],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000070146016,0.000007064853,0.0006448749,0.000022462635,0.0000024119915,0.00003298039,0.009369752,0.000083111954,0.00008058384,0.9822466,0.0047387094,0.002764388],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000129005775,0.000034122826,0.006913666,0.0006676151,0.000013425357,0.00012304906,0.035522863,0.0007680239,0.0005804109,0.21758239,0.7377402,0.00004137865],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03565572,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05943815,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03565572,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012686892,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011595071,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.092050314},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4378978164","doi":"10.3167/hrrh.2023.490206","title":"L'influence des organisations internationales sur les politiques publiques de l'enseignement supérieur au Mexique et la configuration des programmes d’études du diplôme de Droit","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Historical Reflections/Réflexions Historiques","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Explication; Philosophy","score_opus":0.07501901933836283,"score_gpt":0.38910692040299805,"score_spread":0.31408790106463524,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4378978164","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97267187,0.0005465471,0.00017960668,0.0016582754,0.000015223111,0.000015787364,0.00006462555,0.00000487347,0.024843289],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99525046,0.00028499568,0.00010001866,0.00006374791,0.000014665025,0.000017660117,0.0000352268,0.0000017848729,0.004231415],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99856734,0.00044339747,0.000026587108,0.00009539942,0.00020854722,0.0006587119],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9945833,0.0014972931,0.0016239808,0.000094554154,0.0006152202,0.001585674],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015493718,0.00013702863,0.00014220225,0.0010895764,0.0013482281,0.0026281732,0.000327177,0.0003770909,0.0060792277],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00426225,0.00009089683,0.00012564228,0.0010377216,0.0013600101,0.00053689856,0.0021759672,0.00069496385,0.0001703353],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004844217,0.00047780696,0.7281724,0.00040439956,0.000108250126,0.0010245857,0.05852279,0.0023364106,0.0044995914,0.102986045,0.00289808,0.09808524],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020234791,0.00014047082,0.93352616,0.0001833819,0.00003345182,0.000058746507,0.026584389,0.00031370355,0.0006604339,0.0008721811,0.037593737,0.000013072353],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05161445,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06509145,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05161445,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0048105125,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038875926,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10262805},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386947533","doi":"10.18046/recs.i40.5672","title":"Constitucionalismo dialógico y justicia constitucional. Una vuelta larga para volver a las virtudes deliberativas de la Acción Pública de Inconstitucionalidad","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revista CS","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.04240367918298141,"score_gpt":0.4145469089745717,"score_spread":0.3721432297915903,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386947533","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.040690083,0.013987626,0.03116553,0.053330537,0.0004807206,0.000068569774,0.00015344254,0.00010743639,0.860016],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9781902,0.0017717176,0.002748575,0.0010178781,0.00015482566,0.000056785728,0.000033670112,0.000032165186,0.015994126],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99525297,0.0025939704,0.0001318795,0.0008760447,0.00071358547,0.0004314231],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99764687,0.0013436459,0.00026173875,0.0003140976,0.0002061103,0.00022756963],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004121678,0.00037210184,0.00039300404,0.0014564042,0.005950099,0.013039316,0.0008310969,0.0021298372,0.0046741827],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004534818,0.00017792895,0.00030454912,0.0017542981,0.040901367,0.0061011086,0.0036331892,0.0031980646,0.0002602368],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000018973691,0.0000017677347,0.00015226493,0.000019222014,9.940455e-7,0.000013788201,0.0035264739,0.000041523,0.000047557704,0.99341935,0.00040437854,0.0023707529],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015963811,0.000017707982,0.0017890995,0.00025405592,0.0000134310485,0.000103945946,0.01707398,0.00060056715,0.0003789504,0.68289024,0.2968397,0.00002228326],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.037266612,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05171379,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.037266612,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011917222,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009134977,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.086465895},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388711186","doi":"10.5154/r.rga.2013.50-51.07","title":"Usos y costumbres en las comunidades indígenas bajo la teoría del Neoconstitucionalismo","year":2013,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Revista de Geografía Agrícola","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Context (archaeology); Philosophy; Geography","score_opus":0.01300447784558175,"score_gpt":0.3182668526696566,"score_spread":0.30526237482407487,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388711186","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.28280923,0.020367658,0.0044189515,0.033206973,0.00034931157,0.000035566074,0.00018319854,0.0000513301,0.65857774],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94765115,0.0034224242,0.00094202877,0.0009469233,0.00006366476,0.000019492427,0.00004560663,0.00001733446,0.046891328],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99929845,0.00026126055,0.000014161741,0.00010079353,0.0001511224,0.00017408584],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99957603,0.00013380294,0.000074493924,0.000051007202,0.00009920165,0.00006547274],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00091133727,0.00027653782,0.000191575,0.0010514581,0.004772189,0.006287774,0.00079974596,0.0009636479,0.004449381],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011764226,0.0001504021,0.0001667057,0.0018784676,0.013807106,0.0020038176,0.002299805,0.0015923027,0.00022642163],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016533992,0.000006674344,0.004657362,0.00005732763,0.000005451043,0.00017868586,0.037912417,0.00012962274,0.00018305257,0.9410716,0.0034718465,0.0123094395],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016763788,0.000026611035,0.06567046,0.0009360971,0.00005678975,0.00036770417,0.116843216,0.00068782055,0.00070072134,0.14614591,0.668504,0.000043958946],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.38375694,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5940821,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.38375694,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.019688714,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012905587,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.76304644},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388846332","doi":"10.4324/9780429020858-3","title":"Justicia Canadiana","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Geography","score_opus":0.11678828579766382,"score_gpt":0.3652029325472548,"score_spread":0.24841464674959096,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388846332","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0012032476,0.008327823,0.00020921623,0.0047950605,0.00073759316,0.000026812437,0.00024424843,0.000038387305,0.9844177],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.029970068,0.007563689,0.00037369863,0.0030082357,0.00019100039,0.000042897966,0.00026746825,0.00008653067,0.9584964],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991879,0.00005526333,0.0000126966215,0.00016160704,0.00032754947,0.00025493553],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99963343,0.0000465547,0.000013583781,0.000020403206,0.00020253105,0.00008344732],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003646158,0.0007225478,0.00032163027,0.0016536021,0.012861362,0.004596738,0.00077868014,0.0013860408,0.041295145],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00073198666,0.0002591056,0.0002182173,0.0025423672,0.0037732334,0.0012984786,0.001362263,0.0029323772,0.006652488],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014218548,0.000011649705,0.00036332634,0.00014150121,0.000003548828,0.00022264599,0.0073872153,0.0001158817,0.00042124293,0.5173608,0.4329306,0.041027367],"study_design_scores_gemma":[7.0828645e-7,7.3010676e-7,0.00020705059,0.000023383134,6.1147847e-7,0.0000252,0.00025407036,0.000006158247,0.000014337141,0.0009799714,0.99848527,0.0000023156279],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.92964965,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9790303,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07035035,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.036320195,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.036527213,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26352268},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390677204","doi":"10.6035/recerca.7238","title":"Estado de derecho e intervencionismo jurídico","year":2023,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Recerca Revista de pensament i anàlisi","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.061986651941859115,"score_gpt":0.3948349192354252,"score_spread":0.3328482672935661,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390677204","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.075961396,0.009075676,0.01406847,0.050441813,0.0007962316,0.000059281247,0.00007432089,0.00007776945,0.84944504],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9392295,0.0034626536,0.0016265241,0.003559567,0.0003241681,0.00007679588,0.000038638125,0.00005800358,0.051624212],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99157494,0.0046383757,0.00021565874,0.000834117,0.0015537798,0.001183118],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969783,0.0015091647,0.00044120406,0.00031809602,0.0004268677,0.0003263875],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0054654605,0.00034881287,0.00038250588,0.0016771962,0.0078178635,0.013490831,0.0012795664,0.0032357832,0.008492576],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0075711226,0.00022041988,0.00032299926,0.0019785461,0.021430966,0.008486711,0.007258753,0.004627045,0.0010108121],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000036246167,0.000003458917,0.0002333576,0.000020573154,0.0000012296916,0.000029120738,0.0058001946,0.00004861051,0.000032084088,0.9900718,0.0012659719,0.0024899158],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015679201,0.00003692818,0.0026639127,0.0006744886,0.00002352015,0.00014814585,0.04086201,0.00049295323,0.00056514074,0.45689005,0.4975813,0.00004596242],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00930609,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014212208,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013490831,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007636007,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011715696,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05540341},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4393125330","doi":"10.62758/re.v2i1.186","title":"MEDIAÇÃO DA INFORMAÇÃO, PERSPECTIVA DOS COMUNS E PROTAGONISMO SOCIAL: ORGANICIDADES PARA INCLUSÃO, IGUALDADE E EQUIDADE SOCIAL","year":2023,"lang":"pt","type":"article","venue":"Revista EDICIC","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Sociology; Humanities; Art","score_opus":0.1435008814085627,"score_gpt":0.43165638686760033,"score_spread":0.2881555054590376,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4393125330","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16198303,0.016501494,0.028292535,0.04502242,0.0006945497,0.00011449195,0.00023025456,0.00014846008,0.74701273],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9751694,0.0036167565,0.003497253,0.0009082086,0.00020951223,0.0000768428,0.00004206119,0.00005698656,0.016423043],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.990387,0.00635576,0.0003401795,0.0007945393,0.0015721733,0.0005503576],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9821748,0.012951768,0.0015315562,0.0015804718,0.0012251831,0.0005361676],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008023493,0.0005426389,0.00053302356,0.005374393,0.009826014,0.022851361,0.0013849621,0.0032489686,0.008561868],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013445828,0.000429358,0.0005607794,0.0065680225,0.051787294,0.014029149,0.007892664,0.0036223633,0.0008043745],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018790639,0.000012297492,0.0009854445,0.00017305145,0.0000073861506,0.0001870365,0.080992535,0.000069493384,0.0003481094,0.9069839,0.0009891788,0.009232746],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029873527,0.000090545094,0.006884453,0.0012883033,0.00007163855,0.0006924114,0.19238624,0.0005779331,0.002393089,0.42610726,0.36941263,0.000065681445],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0062263003,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0072230296,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022851361,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008741181,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006433154,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.063422024},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401121506","doi":"10.56238/levv15n38-093","title":"Impactos e perspectivas das declarações de Salamanca e Montreal para inclusão como instrumento de conquista da cidadania e da autonomia na contemporaneidade","year":2024,"lang":"pt","type":"article","venue":"LUMEN ET VIRTUS","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.05790864320886395,"score_gpt":0.40496600760881446,"score_spread":0.3470573643999505,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401121506","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.776409,0.0040917383,0.00227111,0.02049867,0.00028225523,0.00020378697,0.00095544505,0.000100021694,0.19518803],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97442913,0.0013408997,0.001013381,0.00079365063,0.000039410228,0.00006291506,0.00017580834,0.000030387113,0.022114478],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99324095,0.0023291372,0.00023785287,0.0006629541,0.0020489062,0.0014802483],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98944026,0.003653301,0.0018116535,0.0005651863,0.0028479844,0.0016815998],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0067533166,0.00037778539,0.00035056542,0.00259947,0.010132319,0.012181548,0.001827541,0.0014046591,0.013815283],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015978986,0.00033548666,0.00040992387,0.005180841,0.0072751963,0.0032435376,0.0077777575,0.0020368728,0.0004561887],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00030780362,0.00016059495,0.19854908,0.0009605072,0.000149536,0.0013306155,0.5258939,0.0010900135,0.0028557268,0.12580669,0.018088808,0.12480665],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022117325,0.000127543,0.27591515,0.0008711998,0.00009465996,0.00013846325,0.42345223,0.00040430468,0.0013289868,0.004484394,0.29302067,0.00014031256],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7514816,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8481921,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7514816,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.034197465,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.034181207,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49996394},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402006746","doi":"10.53054/bmj.vi2278-bis.10486","title":"El principio de solidaridad familiar a la luz de la jurisprudencia de la Corte Constitucional colombiana","year":2024,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Boletín del Ministerio de la Presidencia, Justicia y Relaciones con las Cortes","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Lockheed Martin (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.013307871985333886,"score_gpt":0.3604691473674253,"score_spread":0.3471612753820914,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402006746","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0935621,0.015432612,0.032015037,0.042131104,0.0006007577,0.00015448184,0.0003889255,0.00027584733,0.8154391],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96605265,0.0015230807,0.00490938,0.001419687,0.00014941023,0.00008413268,0.000071705734,0.000042720374,0.025747253],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.996222,0.0014106024,0.00015588458,0.0008069132,0.000773187,0.00063130696],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99683446,0.0007810014,0.000507766,0.00068278686,0.000690271,0.0005036775],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002610546,0.00047559626,0.0005545652,0.0017118108,0.008251961,0.0141241215,0.0010465164,0.0020892841,0.008867792],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0046189413,0.0002767404,0.00031910045,0.0015320634,0.023024024,0.0039988174,0.004659447,0.0035090114,0.00047598363],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000052667397,0.000004464554,0.0005570768,0.000053238266,0.0000038317844,0.000033032124,0.003259739,0.00009209053,0.00013600744,0.9909938,0.001369126,0.0034922604],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000038581817,0.0000636804,0.014166102,0.00046631874,0.000040648556,0.00030347612,0.01570126,0.0006214545,0.00042213328,0.41751632,0.5505733,0.00008671154],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08955321,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.21305202,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08955321,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012205372,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012531307,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17806387},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403095861","doi":"10.37417/r1nbfn13","title":"Las relaciones entre el parlamento y las autoridades independientes: Sistema de nombramiento y control parlamentario","year":2024,"lang":"es","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.021757417839831882,"score_gpt":0.32083256300626295,"score_spread":0.2990751451664311,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403095861","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05199516,0.016978834,0.06100323,0.01913983,0.00049245305,0.00008724311,0.00040982332,0.00027929057,0.8496141],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9121646,0.008652304,0.009887987,0.0016225376,0.0006161554,0.00020624099,0.00031804436,0.00011511337,0.066417],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974255,0.0008934951,0.00014721672,0.00065575173,0.000613106,0.000265025],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99620974,0.0021510955,0.00056979334,0.00035871254,0.0005366765,0.00017401397],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031380248,0.00048246188,0.00037347898,0.0018094616,0.002638037,0.009432052,0.0012834106,0.0017982526,0.014756199],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0052199373,0.00042419703,0.00058507774,0.0028320854,0.008749457,0.0051584877,0.0025472909,0.002417672,0.0014497677],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000075525377,0.000007443612,0.001170366,0.000048562713,0.000006528084,0.00004876715,0.0020546084,0.00025645003,0.00006674375,0.98106694,0.004105456,0.011160481],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022353343,0.00005121975,0.016189799,0.0006811692,0.000049532846,0.00027724224,0.003532382,0.003928642,0.00051275344,0.61131555,0.3633932,0.000046235516],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0139219,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00898675,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014756199,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0050913696,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003986458,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.049364388},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405214092","doi":"10.26522/ssj.v18i4.4367","title":"The Chilean Constitutional Process Narrated Through a Spiral","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Studies in Social Justice","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University College London","keywords":"Spiral (railway); Process (computing); Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Computer science; Engineering; Mechanical engineering","score_opus":0.1332613908672854,"score_gpt":0.49446460909011375,"score_spread":0.36120321822282836,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405214092","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.62284744,0.0026821257,0.018787835,0.038262337,0.00035918297,0.00029503313,0.000447306,0.00031474716,0.31600392],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9828104,0.00042167387,0.0014674928,0.00033955346,0.000033416243,0.00011126698,0.00007230744,0.00008203185,0.014661919],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962186,0.0021615284,0.00007328203,0.00035346794,0.00055545,0.0006376628],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99655765,0.0020462319,0.00029875507,0.0004318721,0.0003189662,0.00034642016],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0049854834,0.00045851414,0.00038190288,0.0017064437,0.01267638,0.013311356,0.0013970694,0.0024476803,0.0063107964],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012645449,0.00042171538,0.0003966635,0.002284038,0.041404065,0.009740514,0.008530672,0.0055412943,0.00053908076],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032606626,0.000019040637,0.0015657265,0.0000792318,0.0000044579306,0.000948978,0.5247762,0.000462157,0.0007961351,0.4610451,0.0032155712,0.007054796],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023215262,0.00003736478,0.0029517682,0.00034721437,0.0000069921844,0.00042984117,0.57145756,0.00089405855,0.001056709,0.07461639,0.34810323,0.00007569383],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.039333176,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.036325768,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.039333176,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.021865979,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0105661955,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1586495},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413263378","doi":"10.35428/cds.vi20.346","title":"El derecho a la educación en el entramado de un Estado federal","year":2024,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Cartografías del Sur","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institute of Aging","funders":"","keywords":"Derecho; Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02033292315950917,"score_gpt":0.36407207090874943,"score_spread":0.34373914774924025,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413263378","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4140431,0.0047579654,0.0050727073,0.025107406,0.00021861483,0.00005633544,0.00009290128,0.000045687662,0.55060524],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97924453,0.0009957647,0.0004141179,0.00056107517,0.00003853392,0.000016891488,0.000014745768,0.000008635271,0.018705685],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965148,0.0018708284,0.00006765389,0.00028843383,0.0005167954,0.00074144674],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972274,0.0012295003,0.00040861208,0.00015833121,0.00056732114,0.0004089218],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002991819,0.00015434175,0.00017704774,0.0007337344,0.0060724895,0.004767277,0.00043329908,0.0010415695,0.0077020656],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004028292,0.00012356366,0.00013662326,0.0010109816,0.0077867927,0.001771565,0.002362897,0.0017483566,0.00027846816],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042078955,0.00003471701,0.013736804,0.0001539961,0.000008314303,0.00044488657,0.074373044,0.00040035023,0.00054193026,0.8685428,0.0070066922,0.03471436],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003168222,0.00015123421,0.13229665,0.0014680879,0.00006282863,0.00034990866,0.138548,0.0009099774,0.001066056,0.059591703,0.66546404,0.000059795213],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09798103,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.19601889,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09798103,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010779405,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010032553,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19482142},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W607779337","doi":"","title":"Traducción del francés al castellano de la ley constitucional francesa de 10 de julio de 1940, del decreto constitucional francés de 4 de octubre de 1941, del decreto constitucional relativo a la sustitución y sucesión de la jefatura del estado francés de 17 de noviembre de 1942 y de la ordenanza de 3 de junio de 1943 instituyendo el comité francés de liberación nacional","year":2014,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Revista europea de historia de las ideas políticas y de las instituciones públicas/Revista europea de historia de las ideas políticas y de las instituciones públicas","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Decree; Philosophy; Art; Political science","score_opus":0.012537132952084876,"score_gpt":0.31497103945391636,"score_spread":0.3024339065018315,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W607779337","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.048504718,0.018824473,0.0026545764,0.05216612,0.004592069,0.00008324541,0.0004326236,0.00006467813,0.8726775],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.44255087,0.005417418,0.0018214514,0.014979532,0.0016000394,0.00029704117,0.00020300805,0.00009578672,0.53303486],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981681,0.00049900357,0.00005938024,0.0002733122,0.00048942235,0.0005107947],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990864,0.00034425536,0.00012606503,0.00009325802,0.000263517,0.000086538275],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024009268,0.0004702996,0.00027419731,0.0014453944,0.00498576,0.0035809968,0.0006823501,0.0034513285,0.0048701577],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003232767,0.00027652332,0.00042073824,0.0011239167,0.011217275,0.0017565014,0.0018196589,0.0055988487,0.00087930536],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000554554,0.000016755417,0.0009765225,0.000060573002,0.0000056743615,0.000118382835,0.011390724,0.00010157021,0.00037512413,0.91819537,0.0578554,0.01084842],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014756282,0.000028077031,0.00990554,0.00024533368,0.0000064102314,0.000060690007,0.0019841928,0.00004341636,0.00025155334,0.014936456,0.97250324,0.000020352021],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.103962995,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16655134,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.103962995,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011391049,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0062729036,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2067157},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W64984606","doi":"10.15581/009.40.29270","title":"Propiedad y derechos subjetivos","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Anuario Filosófico","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Hegelianism; Divergence (linguistics); Property (philosophy); Philosophy; Epistemology; Linguistics","score_opus":0.05083625474904832,"score_gpt":0.403124759786123,"score_spread":0.35228850503707465,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W64984606","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.042574823,0.0055918936,0.0084930975,0.01660277,0.0017279269,0.000059127142,0.00020679936,0.0002426757,0.9245008],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8599019,0.009213899,0.0046048015,0.004374179,0.0017105886,0.00023169968,0.0004239254,0.00022846846,0.11931057],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963457,0.0015782212,0.00013630824,0.0005435288,0.00080808613,0.00058806624],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981249,0.00085666316,0.00019946785,0.000369883,0.0003272169,0.000121951096],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0059849434,0.00086052786,0.0010886363,0.001979096,0.0060034306,0.007728104,0.001115477,0.0037856281,0.009619245],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0057675615,0.0003293539,0.0009588603,0.001321824,0.020072384,0.0073838374,0.005922212,0.008566362,0.0014279567],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033792243,0.000025865098,0.00031406904,0.000032021355,0.0000036811196,0.0001419974,0.003128558,0.000047668247,0.00011829867,0.98762727,0.0025850155,0.0059417686],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008853641,0.00006442015,0.0021292495,0.00039762474,0.00003422027,0.0005875765,0.010747726,0.00050113775,0.0008701126,0.37394106,0.6105883,0.00004999556],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01199238,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010783402,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01199238,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0077803964,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035718086,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.056451023},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7030566485","doi":"","title":"National Bank Financial and Sun Life Financial Announce Closing of Project Borealis PV Solar Farms in Ontario, Canada","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Closing (real estate); Financial analysis; National bank; Financial instrument; Government (linguistics)","score_opus":0.031209394052786804,"score_gpt":0.29735658029502354,"score_spread":0.26614718624223677,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7030566485","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21536149,0.0025423223,0.0007253883,0.05469381,0.00040737522,0.00020160842,0.0033465347,0.00007413994,0.72264725],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.38907793,0.0010143023,0.00035636488,0.0049150996,0.00005732283,0.00005564759,0.00043701127,0.00004306786,0.60404325],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978714,0.00012256211,0.000036360372,0.00015984167,0.0007723422,0.0010374206],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980691,0.0003897032,0.000098278826,0.0000879391,0.0008470255,0.00050798676],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013803797,0.00016871499,0.00032861467,0.0006449844,0.022186141,0.0065599317,0.0014622333,0.00394756,0.017341048],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0034988355,0.0004405443,0.00026002523,0.0015371097,0.004116551,0.0010808505,0.001765577,0.004425251,0.0006100906],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021132753,0.00011216984,0.022650998,0.00019942224,0.000035971636,0.0018717386,0.04171323,0.0009181646,0.0018350015,0.44619185,0.4535946,0.030665535],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000031808544,0.00001536104,0.066555284,0.000104391824,0.000018586326,0.00008048394,0.025569636,0.00040582937,0.00048759193,0.004161953,0.9025199,0.000049312992],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9951999,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.998958,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.109583534,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.109583534,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.15754174,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.79508793},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7033694896","doi":"","title":"A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial to Evaluate the Therapeutic Effect of Magnesium-L-Threonate Supplementation for Persistent Pain After Breast Cancer Surgery","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Breast cancer; Therapeutic effect; McGill Pain Questionnaire; Placebo; Chronic pain; Neuropathic pain; Anxiety; Pain medicine","score_opus":0.3028585194299553,"score_gpt":0.585693161385269,"score_spread":0.28283464195531366,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7033694896","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9730708,0.008860754,0.0009022415,0.00072013243,0.0013905208,0.012888597,0.0008112051,0.00012631019,0.00122952],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9666618,0.004607232,0.0026849394,0.0012958024,0.000880747,0.020534778,0.0007205503,0.000015735053,0.0025983488],"study_design_codex":"randomized_trial","study_design_gemma":"randomized_trial","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989899,0.0005138417,0.000120542645,0.00017744766,0.00007834881,0.00011998444],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99856395,0.0004044596,0.00031579353,0.0001287342,0.00015411139,0.0004328658],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002238917,0.0017045926,0.005915865,0.0005820958,0.0008424308,0.0008413899,0.0010835975,0.0024829367,0.006820924],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025686119,0.00096825685,0.0019552566,0.0004886057,0.001569679,0.0011655965,0.00061912864,0.0023710593,0.0009431892],"study_design_candidate":"randomized_trial","study_design_consensus":"randomized_trial","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.9864202,0.0066534923,0.00022682153,0.00088865054,0.0005719621,0.000018258666,0.00003102665,0.0000539175,0.0011765966,0.000033384404,0.00015802578,0.0037676217],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.9666426,0.03236529,0.00041726726,0.000020668966,0.0002227073,0.000006031291,0.000008424546,0.000079855956,0.00008911729,0.000024623501,0.000117688454,0.000005636394],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00087372394,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001731195,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006820924,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00069802016,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016683057,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.022818267},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7119446081","doi":"","title":"The legal development of the notion of human dignity in the constitutional jurisprudence","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dignity; Jurisprudence; Human rights; Reputation; Philosophy of law; Constitutional court","score_opus":0.056499666021540176,"score_gpt":0.3696061576897807,"score_spread":0.31310649166824056,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7119446081","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07132448,0.03290782,0.22972511,0.044843677,0.0012227044,0.00023586117,0.00014026479,0.000054619704,0.6195455],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9561803,0.004919537,0.031161679,0.0017035262,0.00038967934,0.00020525075,0.000038320202,0.000034019013,0.005367538],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.987206,0.009317201,0.00034129788,0.00096939056,0.0017063675,0.00045970123],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98207414,0.013191313,0.0009365659,0.0018762132,0.001476485,0.0004452516],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.025060942,0.0005075841,0.0009782335,0.004537034,0.005617023,0.009098105,0.0020849463,0.0043009664,0.0022611034],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023418626,0.00037972972,0.0006439651,0.0033520465,0.08466656,0.014129485,0.006576702,0.0062118713,0.00018653712],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000018619488,0.0000025507873,0.000030299105,0.000013201677,0.0000011421718,0.000016945372,0.0013834601,0.00007120654,0.000029742014,0.9970023,0.000046418216,0.0014008394],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007744993,0.000045051354,0.00046031244,0.00027772904,0.00000774845,0.00012338204,0.002213738,0.0005646927,0.00017778015,0.9625138,0.03359182,0.000016226997],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0072619254,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0056978674,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025060942,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0114167845,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01032922,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13253647},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7120453026","doi":"","title":"Caso Airton Honorato y otros vs. Brasil : amicus curiae presentado ante la Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos","year":2023,"lang":"pt","type":"article","venue":"Lume (Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul)","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul; Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais; University of Toronto; Universidade Federal de Santa Maria; Universidade Federal de Uberlândia; Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior; Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico; University of Ottawa","keywords":"Human rights; Jurisprudence; Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)","score_opus":0.03040926991168221,"score_gpt":0.3271751904561916,"score_spread":0.2967659205445094,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7120453026","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5391905,0.009368973,0.0012131628,0.04293098,0.00030309247,0.000041259114,0.00008323974,0.000026620475,0.4068423],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98897237,0.0012343557,0.0002099893,0.0013204567,0.00003423028,0.000009368147,0.000009130265,0.0000056202957,0.008204526],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971673,0.0011687292,0.000080695085,0.00048547133,0.0006133092,0.00048458992],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974963,0.0011922406,0.0004004749,0.0002780434,0.00031655678,0.00031634406],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026227639,0.00015798306,0.00023646271,0.0011671176,0.0091348775,0.005120388,0.0003921584,0.0014511062,0.0037403156],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004334333,0.00015438015,0.00011656045,0.002360504,0.013339926,0.0020338073,0.0030319255,0.0018746735,0.00015157576],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027506818,0.000020027635,0.011113595,0.00010316262,0.000009558692,0.00052250095,0.21159847,0.000052724594,0.001012878,0.738596,0.00798632,0.028957253],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000127872645,0.00004525695,0.075768545,0.00061520573,0.00004233048,0.00054721057,0.31292927,0.00017095014,0.0009430771,0.056361258,0.552514,0.00005011666],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10657864,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2960888,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10657864,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006592754,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007817875,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21191657},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7133682114","doi":"10.20318/eunomia.2013.2146","title":"La interpretación constructiva en el constitucionalismo commonwealth: ¿activismo o vandalismo judicial?","year":2014,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"EUNOMÍA Revista en Cultura de la Legalidad","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"International Council for Canadian Studies","keywords":"Interpretation (philosophy); Constructive; Supreme court; Duty; Constitutionalism; Legislation; Focus (optics); Judicial interpretation","score_opus":0.010996729463039218,"score_gpt":0.35743762007417423,"score_spread":0.34644089061113503,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7133682114","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.109865665,0.0057801954,0.029266382,0.058421668,0.00094824086,0.0000532203,0.00008614798,0.00006888527,0.7955096],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98545176,0.000873451,0.0011513977,0.0010573562,0.00026543072,0.000026955651,0.000020155647,0.000030093925,0.011123323],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99275255,0.0034092835,0.00018271111,0.000830795,0.0017794368,0.0010451835],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9948906,0.0031184591,0.0006059196,0.00050308835,0.00067646155,0.00020540485],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0066237273,0.0003933406,0.00048209226,0.0025772464,0.008932191,0.015841346,0.0017402413,0.003356114,0.0021291128],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010284029,0.00030846157,0.0003541813,0.0020986563,0.07828506,0.006966909,0.004327083,0.0055594146,0.000214033],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000014906783,0.000002168134,0.00013599926,0.000007641883,8.256264e-7,0.000022567498,0.0077503016,0.000027213135,0.00003919252,0.9901663,0.00048785692,0.0013584404],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018059627,0.000020383755,0.0023904876,0.00036455886,0.000023077013,0.0001663849,0.030754084,0.00084418297,0.00054229546,0.7555119,0.20933293,0.00003174712],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07528156,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07789853,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07528156,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013918967,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0103340475,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14968675},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7140100909","doi":"10.20318/eunomia.2014.2196","title":"El dominio del Derecho. Recíproca rendición de cuentas e imperio de la Ley","year":2014,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"EUNOMÍA Revista en Cultura de la Legalidad","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Cambridge; University of Oxford; York University","keywords":"General partnership; Government (linguistics); Reciprocal; Rule of law; Core (optical fiber); Ideal (ethics); Ethos; Corporate governance; Public law","score_opus":0.011932477856917471,"score_gpt":0.36044138639304774,"score_spread":0.34850890853613026,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7140100909","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.048054278,0.006285448,0.010524981,0.023486517,0.0007621093,0.000032511838,0.00012962846,0.00020374506,0.9105208],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9062229,0.002115075,0.00176257,0.0010027809,0.00036654624,0.00004309875,0.00006890353,0.0002029412,0.088215284],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99699485,0.0014304612,0.00006138816,0.0005094263,0.0006622325,0.00034159576],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99786013,0.000780989,0.00032239125,0.0005097433,0.00037847375,0.00014831235],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002593661,0.00034329836,0.00027244695,0.0015230566,0.004294422,0.0100454,0.00095204025,0.001712713,0.007878973],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007548909,0.00026526317,0.0002837102,0.0013699012,0.01813287,0.007074646,0.004693398,0.0025281457,0.0014302145],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022335294,0.000008302886,0.00044451965,0.000028761226,0.000002729864,0.00008000018,0.015117119,0.00010573346,0.00015128801,0.9664233,0.0049966155,0.012619376],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014793745,0.000019371233,0.0015230902,0.00020131632,0.0000130595945,0.00019109336,0.017556792,0.00029925784,0.0005389449,0.2070875,0.772529,0.000025647008],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01543439,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018703293,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01543439,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005304634,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037947223,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03848797},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7140138948","doi":"10.20318/eunomia.2014.2207","title":"Autoridad","year":2014,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"EUNOMÍA Revista en Cultura de la Legalidad","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Chicago; Harvard University; University of Toronto; University of Oxford; Yale University","keywords":"Politics; Autonomy; Point (geometry); Work (physics); Action (physics); Power (physics)","score_opus":0.010773533016650952,"score_gpt":0.33868553265489615,"score_spread":0.3279119996382452,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7140138948","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0046572927,0.0029783698,0.0030328957,0.007048342,0.002426703,0.00005641193,0.0013794312,0.0016773122,0.9767432],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.056396574,0.0023557614,0.0031213856,0.0022673607,0.00055973255,0.00008113313,0.0015687816,0.0009339862,0.9327153],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.998823,0.00021127562,0.000058198177,0.00026548392,0.00047809212,0.00016397501],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987752,0.0001957447,0.00009221386,0.0002763656,0.00038480124,0.00027576642],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010870534,0.00057427253,0.0004448648,0.0013632593,0.0023459161,0.005214612,0.0011094391,0.0018227717,0.2756774],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0032534855,0.00026782526,0.00046955672,0.0010448636,0.0014493163,0.0032723167,0.0035813607,0.0021358056,0.11712091],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026319374,0.00009443509,0.0014967402,0.00043338514,0.000015463916,0.00060226495,0.0023249981,0.00024125932,0.0011885102,0.3298503,0.42187017,0.24161918],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000074621125,0.000010264906,0.0003139287,0.0000660374,0.0000029831529,0.00019251963,0.00019948873,0.00006310552,0.0002314924,0.0051673586,0.9937395,0.0000059442277],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0042775264,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006564159,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2756774,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018052369,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021421707,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W8629607","doi":"10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a008664","title":"Mauritania: la \"rectificación\" de la democracia","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Afkar ideas: Revista trimestral para el diálogo entre el Magreb, España y Europa","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Geography","score_opus":0.017786938378702075,"score_gpt":0.3629824692375754,"score_spread":0.3451955308588733,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W8629607","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.71078163,0.1158628,0.0005450138,0.0554346,0.0020233185,0.000106267114,0.007431344,0.0002829863,0.107532024],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9494733,0.022036841,0.0009335025,0.0023124043,0.0007099357,0.000055630382,0.0017891955,0.000035431476,0.02265388],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996203,0.00007589262,0.000022581324,0.000042823875,0.000082403916,0.00015594374],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995871,0.000055155597,0.00010810524,0.00003518155,0.00011092321,0.000103576254],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005044516,0.00029854622,0.00022248742,0.0012589318,0.0014941414,0.0013478653,0.00046911466,0.0004369529,0.007906723],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015682097,0.00015405988,0.00034120266,0.0023684448,0.00092284865,0.0006580022,0.0010041652,0.0010056956,0.00079099473],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002979448,0.00014012937,0.5119167,0.000988407,0.0001819072,0.002886165,0.006989698,0.00062277843,0.0021872206,0.03488863,0.06146741,0.37743306],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002573636,0.000044632696,0.7306829,0.00029432675,0.000033875458,0.00065370026,0.002075841,0.000317244,0.0002810396,0.0008831099,0.2646831,0.000024417453],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6189709,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7374162,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6189709,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0081234565,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008800193,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.76654613},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W87401982","doi":"","title":"El rol de Canadá frente a la Comisión Interamericana de Derechos Humanos en el contexto de la OEA","year":2012,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Cuestiones Jurídicas","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Art","score_opus":0.0399432141204982,"score_gpt":0.4579854370517774,"score_spread":0.41804222293127924,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W87401982","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19240388,0.009049856,0.002025122,0.096463844,0.0004364244,0.000047643563,0.00024001671,0.000029115678,0.6993041],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95937103,0.0031003195,0.00048878853,0.0043015666,0.00007748311,0.00001596608,0.00002703757,0.000015995125,0.032601688],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9951763,0.0010175472,0.00007649245,0.0004413604,0.0016948192,0.0015933785],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99430674,0.0022931925,0.00040119232,0.00021296943,0.0018204562,0.00096532697],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003658141,0.00021452436,0.00034251148,0.0016881533,0.022008173,0.01430575,0.0012919601,0.002883852,0.006572663],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0063759955,0.00021652425,0.00022196786,0.0032182487,0.027705083,0.0024359745,0.0042392393,0.0043552695,0.00017966822],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020942618,0.000011056326,0.0035266147,0.000051759336,0.0000066675348,0.00021594792,0.027809976,0.00020300828,0.00021043755,0.94931644,0.0074971584,0.011129937],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018100975,0.0000202643,0.020375846,0.00056873873,0.000045487363,0.00016844159,0.14448668,0.00036445668,0.0006257517,0.056200583,0.77704364,0.00008202598],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96826565,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98693544,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07598157,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07598157,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.17690824,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5512875},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W94566060","doi":"","title":"La Comunidad Europea, la Unión Europea y el Acuerdo con Canadá sobre tratamiento de datos API/PNR: ¿Crónica de la probable denuncia y sustitución anunciadas de un Tratado?","year":2007,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Revista General de Derecho Europeo / General Journal of European Law - ISSN 1696-9634","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.020635396796600574,"score_gpt":0.3387381831798606,"score_spread":0.31810278638326,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W94566060","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.60563415,0.036914323,0.0031511465,0.10676073,0.0011848825,0.00048489065,0.0076855817,0.00018655944,0.23799773],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9136642,0.019336943,0.0024915806,0.020080214,0.00023599678,0.00012938019,0.0021516336,0.00007472257,0.04183522],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99444807,0.0010265411,0.0002608269,0.00035498073,0.0018612657,0.0020482468],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98496616,0.0024861281,0.0020677063,0.0005071333,0.007366962,0.0026058513],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0043343757,0.00028264645,0.00036182094,0.0015853386,0.0028814042,0.004620972,0.0010749404,0.001067076,0.0058423863],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01625541,0.00024497934,0.0004884779,0.0029659872,0.0024436784,0.0011167885,0.0017134413,0.0019406602,0.00034988794],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0015581851,0.00024135233,0.47603527,0.0012713117,0.0007982196,0.0009534715,0.009742782,0.002518967,0.0025301308,0.057956245,0.09235832,0.35403562],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008567441,0.0002563289,0.5811918,0.0015964598,0.00033748758,0.00033454777,0.019530332,0.00072865095,0.0023513497,0.0020993946,0.39134055,0.00014742279],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9574492,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9732154,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.042550802,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.028480772,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.109582745,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2066434},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W987159862","doi":"10.18356/f1e4ed5d-en","title":"Human rights and the state in Latin America","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"Griffith Research Online (Griffith University, Queensland, Australia)","topic":"Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Wilfrid Laurier University","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Political science; Bureaucracy; Context (archaeology); Democracy; State (computer science); Authoritarianism; Latin Americans; Law; Irony; Successor cardinal; Political economy; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics; History; Philosophy","score_opus":0.14687598113539863,"score_gpt":0.44760576356991866,"score_spread":0.30072978243452003,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W987159862","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.065578714,0.03230871,0.0008193093,0.06065512,0.00022590392,0.000020223213,0.00006731409,0.000026675123,0.84029806],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92706513,0.010071995,0.00042950752,0.0066154213,0.00021906961,0.00007234683,0.000053498665,0.000025435782,0.05544756],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991979,0.00041073823,0.000019218856,0.00010193152,0.00010048319,0.00016970153],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99966586,0.00016797063,0.000049598828,0.0000339381,0.000040534927,0.000042104573],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011187291,0.00020233865,0.00017347846,0.0009718997,0.004803058,0.0065174303,0.0003740828,0.0013780751,0.005253638],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016389381,0.00010765761,0.00014472872,0.0019131374,0.022658236,0.0028001172,0.0036492604,0.0023822566,0.00022349393],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000052427754,0.0000076274223,0.0006048724,0.00003328542,0.0000021947083,0.00009854897,0.0143089695,0.0001209035,0.00009180825,0.9775988,0.0020595603,0.005068243],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029579049,0.000018377841,0.0051831105,0.00048425698,0.000005803983,0.00015572853,0.024942892,0.00019554875,0.0001823652,0.3263311,0.6424465,0.000024768657],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.055132516,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.049437925,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.055132516,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011354181,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0052890526,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.109623194},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}