{"meta":{"query_hash":"7623da691b4d","filters":{"topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction"},"cohort_total":941,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":941,"exported":941,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/7623da691b4d","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?topic=Conflict+of+Laws+and+Jurisdiction"},"results":[{"id":"W1034493188","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511617706.016","title":"Domestic Partnership and Default Rules","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"General partnership; Business; Finance","score_opus":0.029011444085496642,"score_gpt":0.24782211117382869,"score_spread":0.21881066708833205,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1034493188","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0006005573,0.00028217016,0.00006341594,0.000064848704,0.00014765358,0.00026123447,0.00007341509,0.00014827965,0.9983584],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.008892859,0.00025850267,0.000025684203,0.000030982992,0.00032148586,4.1453674e-7,0.000030725438,0.00002137282,0.99041796],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989123,0.00005479141,0.0001224178,0.0003429993,0.0003011407,0.0002663466],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992488,0.00010704836,0.0001379418,0.00020692377,0.000110348316,0.00018893788],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00016797356,0.00021482912,0.00025130532,0.00011770196,0.00058308494,0.00009163227,0.0002257867,0.00037936112,0.000009162984],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000013292941,0.00026329028,0.00011501068,0.000006198479,0.00063913624,0.000087541004,0.000120334415,0.0002602926,0.000013489116],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022064472,0.00000422763,0.000008254818,0.00002436908,0.00003216356,0.00011548723,0.0002480337,4.9805107e-7,0.0000026183257,0.96744597,0.029715218,0.0023810668],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026218765,0.000021945882,0.00013590114,0.00007889709,0.0001565743,0.0000039627,0.00011083227,0.000007908266,0.0000038755115,0.000082596074,0.9988465,0.00028884888],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004044534,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00016076105,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96913123,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015428699,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014400833,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99998194},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W105120299","doi":"","title":"The Citation of Overseas Authority in Rights Litigation in New Zealand: How Much Bark? How Much Bite?","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Skepticism; Law; Expansive; Political science; Discretion; Position (finance); Citation; Primary authority; Scope (computer science); Common law; Business; Legal research","score_opus":0.012256782850882535,"score_gpt":0.2859796415920334,"score_spread":0.2737228587411508,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W105120299","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98027885,0.0008047502,0.0012882137,0.0138398735,0.00035107293,0.00020512196,8.7785196e-7,0.000015864718,0.0032153984],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9929437,0.0016904619,0.000037649286,0.000016806565,0.0004782259,0.000001303706,0.0000024986002,0.0000060307466,0.0048233313],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.997582,0.0002694838,0.00025708906,0.00013826227,0.0005346961,0.0012184799],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992347,0.00021245907,0.00023296886,0.00008940325,0.0001243552,0.00010616012],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006778219,0.000092940165,0.00013348504,0.00022059494,0.00043535166,0.00013172129,0.00018795636,0.00012879602,0.000012831365],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023007422,0.00007420383,0.00007591604,0.00060683175,0.000092380185,0.00043341148,0.000011032918,0.0009348367,0.0000014626928],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013606752,0.00006699236,0.026239347,0.0000031051686,0.000029022685,0.0000036446868,0.013232174,0.0000040559976,0.0008438099,0.9041582,0.00039360003,0.054889984],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001360232,0.00024038614,0.093794525,0.00005962297,0.00001764229,0.000012970964,0.023605585,0.00008803246,0.00037216806,0.78909,0.091173925,0.00018492392],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009418424,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4065307,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.39711228,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011538093,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020530543,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99717796},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W105835462","doi":"","title":"The Central Authority's Role Under the Hague Child Abduction Convention: A Friend in Deed","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Convention; Deed; Commission","score_opus":0.01183632001611879,"score_gpt":0.2749969363166129,"score_spread":0.26316061630049414,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W105835462","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.31205666,0.00047592167,0.0029976645,0.30178133,0.0027648553,0.00064184295,0.0000034200266,0.0001699995,0.37910828],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9892765,0.0002051514,0.000007721818,0.00010548987,0.0004870914,0.0000129389455,4.833172e-7,0.0000035440867,0.009901049],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990738,0.0001703717,0.00013396861,0.0001236339,0.00023005746,0.00026817014],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996328,0.0001074246,0.00004425347,0.00012589301,0.000036825728,0.000052825573],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00072214694,0.000054409746,0.00005151883,0.000019296693,0.0010912026,0.00010483278,0.0001502065,0.000059833637,0.00046835563],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004047676,0.000024619032,0.000054138858,0.00016318039,0.00024450573,0.00018708083,0.000021298143,0.00007797225,0.000040797306],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018166904,0.000030113923,0.0033820488,5.205084e-7,0.000009869483,3.570257e-7,0.0046316176,0.0000017176761,0.00012972848,0.9585015,0.0007668735,0.03252749],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032553167,0.000019330246,0.11387565,0.000014689236,0.000007463096,0.0000014804909,0.014978681,0.000031370226,0.00015595426,0.018937547,0.85157377,0.00007854234],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005261552,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.039277367,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93956393,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009339881,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005611298,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9782533},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W105991027","doi":"","title":"Deena R. Zimmerman. A Lifetime Companion to the Laws of Jewish Family Life. Jerusalem, New York: Urim Publications, 2006.","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Women in Judaism A Multidisciplinary e-Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Judaism; Law; Political science; History; Philosophy; Theology","score_opus":0.03700928633179574,"score_gpt":0.3154300897653495,"score_spread":0.27842080343355374,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W105991027","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9124898,0.0028208143,0.00072051375,0.063465685,0.0012328917,0.0008294891,0.000028447346,0.0000964896,0.01831587],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99137384,0.00061224523,0.0009204134,0.0006971023,0.0018282046,0.000026183627,0.000009050907,0.000022631926,0.004510329],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964292,0.0004581562,0.00094765547,0.00032627425,0.00090492197,0.0009337682],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99767816,0.00018776821,0.000492603,0.00040890762,0.00025740138,0.00097513886],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035428756,0.00024135198,0.0004206873,0.0004536145,0.0014097036,0.00037756184,0.0010146202,0.00016878612,0.0002978716],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00024091921,0.00019713046,0.00017631252,0.0011979528,0.0001838143,0.00066523463,0.00015006668,0.00068326975,0.00009556715],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006892726,0.0022655027,0.08134047,0.000027739146,0.00022031894,0.00006337681,0.4946655,0.0022793557,0.0021944891,0.012607981,0.24565871,0.15798728],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015339144,0.0004869683,0.5854951,0.00014466779,0.000035809688,0.000051031086,0.020780195,0.0002927141,0.000014412141,0.0054819672,0.38529107,0.00039216157],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00066501676,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00041865022,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5041546,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004505197,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001058168,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998903},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W106135499","doi":"10.21991/c9fh4p","title":"BURYING ROTHMAN: THE SUPREME COURT AND THE RIGHT TO REMAIN SILENT","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.026490083894995447,"score_gpt":0.26767407790958886,"score_spread":0.24118399401459342,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W106135499","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017564105,0.0019529762,0.08670951,0.15281673,0.004376794,0.003299295,0.00014072761,0.00036655384,0.7327733],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9941119,0.00019947282,0.0004990166,0.0036370482,0.0003473751,0.00017781461,0.000010995134,0.000007844024,0.0010085672],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99747324,0.00025600826,0.0004673473,0.00042409834,0.000664742,0.00071458623],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984804,0.00039784296,0.00015065687,0.00038925686,0.00029685473,0.00028503666],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018414706,0.0002532787,0.000276305,0.00012318054,0.0058250586,0.00020906204,0.00052048714,0.00015435251,0.00064505945],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00058953924,0.00015982726,0.00018788977,0.00039453208,0.012417365,0.000480182,0.00022772978,0.0003005132,0.0001719093],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013248692,0.00004177837,0.0028517693,0.000003959815,0.00005334924,0.000009017487,0.0032156832,0.00003713529,0.000028083616,0.987137,0.0053685233,0.0011212179],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001427657,0.000042727246,0.0012754662,0.00009360832,0.00008428492,0.000096184805,0.007277494,0.00022484007,0.00011588072,0.05432094,0.9347047,0.00033616816],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002242738,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033795612,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9765478,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018708437,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00089996675,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9954692},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W11172357","doi":"10.1002/hep.510330227","title":"Reasonable Accommodation as a Settling Concept","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian women's studies","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Settling; Accommodation; Environmental science; Psychology; Environmental engineering; Neuroscience","score_opus":0.025292509532532318,"score_gpt":0.31321113571681014,"score_spread":0.2879186261842778,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W11172357","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8098829,0.00078822026,0.0000037952423,0.0142191565,0.00043616703,0.00021892812,0.0000106788,0.00009878964,0.1743414],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98902637,0.00020253618,0.000033337008,0.002940733,0.0003562079,0.000018304849,0.000004648062,0.000004913168,0.0074129766],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990263,0.000052342686,0.000113070586,0.00015771764,0.00017625024,0.0004742992],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993526,0.00005110188,0.000042602464,0.00010190893,0.00013712078,0.00031470926],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00033460173,0.000083630686,0.0001402572,0.00009551721,0.0011333489,0.00007963873,0.000110975816,0.000054978973,0.0002765684],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00025262375,0.00008866537,0.000029274428,0.0002474321,0.00013007932,0.00020397952,0.000009320366,0.0000751238,0.00006694324],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017538252,0.00003328158,0.0012878171,0.0000093961,0.00014370686,0.00004988192,0.46673834,0.000040189476,0.00005243736,0.44162506,0.016256385,0.07374597],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018696609,0.000086425825,0.0014520229,0.000024746076,0.000010698761,0.0000010006784,0.1763376,0.000009339711,0.000012959932,0.022133257,0.79956126,0.00018372593],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012881126,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08334865,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.78330487,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000903283,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00046741767,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99369216},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W112340790","doi":"","title":"\"Cross-border High Anxiety? Offensive and Defensive Strategies in Transnational Litigation: Offensive Strategies\"","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Offensive; Jurisdiction; Political science; Presentation (obstetrics); Adversary; Contradiction; Law enforcement; Law; Public relations; Business; Computer security; Economics; Management","score_opus":0.007915159962747673,"score_gpt":0.3355214574742419,"score_spread":0.3276062975114942,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W112340790","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97224563,0.0011612361,0.0030310699,0.0051932153,0.0003617823,0.00024934503,0.000005636848,0.000039967934,0.017712105],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9951836,0.0026824411,0.00009642811,0.00023981674,0.00053461926,0.0000040329155,0.000009999614,0.000016021644,0.0012330447],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99683666,0.00014249368,0.0004204401,0.00027944535,0.00057564385,0.0017453083],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986734,0.00018389855,0.00018715819,0.00008742587,0.00071438414,0.00015374938],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025957325,0.00018580399,0.00022182571,0.00019532838,0.0007097296,0.00041998597,0.00013606345,0.00020418572,0.00021047857],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000076030046,0.00018871066,0.00008644898,0.00034975974,0.00041306985,0.0008171709,0.000015785512,0.0012556289,0.000004498847],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000090998816,0.000033705855,0.002775741,0.0000042259826,0.00005333001,0.0000125567885,0.0071384953,0.0001019092,0.00020487237,0.9768908,0.000014439131,0.012678932],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019593365,0.000356926,0.13483775,0.000028533397,0.000039132476,0.00028100674,0.17407283,0.000024644927,0.000109012515,0.64659894,0.041254226,0.00043769405],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026860868,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.071030505,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3302919,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008043381,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0045409105,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.94592077},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1150528758","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.2810","title":"Book Note: Judicial Decision-Making in a Globalised World: A Comparative Analysis of the Changing Practices of Western Highest Courts, by Elaine Mak","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Judicial opinion; Law; Sociology; Law and economics","score_opus":0.0399550450963449,"score_gpt":0.3864004467570552,"score_spread":0.3464454016607103,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1150528758","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.36286113,0.008932737,0.004185601,0.013704781,0.0017936297,0.0008486953,0.0001285376,0.000052606414,0.60749227],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99882126,0.00009997033,0.00026360678,0.00034935118,0.00020726607,0.0000024233207,0.0000019250858,0.000005570057,0.0002486058],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976239,0.0004298351,0.00055178365,0.00015664789,0.0009430699,0.00029475868],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975145,0.00042237563,0.0014578528,0.00015703405,0.00032388078,0.00012435784],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020842908,0.0001189501,0.00044143855,0.00033146245,0.00042707013,0.00010945058,0.00037782782,0.00007578955,0.00014238474],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022762078,0.00009218692,0.00018081864,0.0014662669,0.00024590333,0.00047552338,0.00007914467,0.0002690386,0.0000017335637],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0026749729,0.0021288125,0.3146456,0.00004408066,0.0029578083,0.00013285613,0.26962164,0.010093774,0.0010436621,0.3605467,0.02146261,0.014647497],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0057491614,0.0004848865,0.086458944,0.0021910712,0.0036967038,0.00004779879,0.030107338,0.008294425,0.00053845905,0.02173649,0.8396278,0.0010669406],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.025207993,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4596303,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8181652,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021930011,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020044748,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98128325},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W131512840","doi":"","title":"THE DOCTRINE OF ADOPTION OF CUSTOMARY INTERNATIONAL LAW: A FUTURE IN CONFLICTING DOMESTIC LAW AND CROWN TORT LIABILITY","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Tort; Legislation; Doctrine; Customary international law; Political science; Principal (computer security); Common law; Municipal law; Liability; Conflict of laws; International law; Business; Public international law","score_opus":0.011227561302186904,"score_gpt":0.28843705148403875,"score_spread":0.27720949018185187,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W131512840","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92603236,0.0013318558,0.000083995445,0.00086876337,0.00041294628,0.00013014546,0.0000016334565,0.000010125812,0.07112818],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99562526,0.003727909,0.00003130537,0.00002372457,0.0002794487,0.000002155807,6.5125215e-7,0.0000036837719,0.00030589235],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99876046,0.00012166601,0.0003020925,0.00009090006,0.00025334308,0.00047156285],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994356,0.000088198954,0.00021890437,0.00007415723,0.00014390558,0.000039216462],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029452245,0.00006042962,0.00011323749,0.00004219393,0.00026304382,0.000023136658,0.0001726458,0.00006262734,0.000032469783],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000066056775,0.0000461395,0.000052209172,0.0001051666,0.00029279417,0.0002039204,0.00002717581,0.0005061342,4.5949463e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012648046,0.000049335675,0.009329962,0.000003890242,0.00003152395,5.896949e-7,0.0041134614,0.0000011722625,0.00014864703,0.9753787,0.0000022720321,0.010813984],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0031444333,0.0010971283,0.17655377,0.00016661835,0.000118973825,0.00022735678,0.049910977,0.0001385229,0.0004919199,0.5202788,0.24743363,0.0004378399],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0053064195,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.041365944,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.45509985,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025754404,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00045651663,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9761266},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W13583423","doi":"10.1164/artpd.1958.78.4.610","title":"Common Law Relationships in Ontario – The Details","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Review of Tuberculosis","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.02873567802602111,"score_gpt":0.30018415806051296,"score_spread":0.27144848003449185,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W13583423","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7002366,0.009812308,0.000005633703,0.041744813,0.000108347354,0.0010484153,0.0000018208924,0.000033078297,0.24700898],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98061675,0.015587692,0.0001202208,0.0031843104,0.000026516205,0.00008075409,0.0000029427656,0.0000053922467,0.00037543903],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986421,0.0004873071,0.00032887832,0.00011673851,0.00025458794,0.00017038405],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99914795,0.00028645137,0.00018466663,0.00024625543,0.00007811019,0.0000565541],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009664117,0.00007355693,0.00026847553,0.00002839594,0.00023691992,0.00002483997,0.00021430758,0.000025021873,0.0009236921],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000092037015,0.00005250106,0.00011023021,0.0004231043,0.0005084797,0.00017277537,0.00002799526,0.00021497108,0.00009131297],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003507326,0.00012957891,0.73045653,0.00027949075,0.00005657941,0.0000010039752,0.01174852,0.0000027516403,0.00002521211,0.09609658,0.0077700107,0.15343024],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000046582547,0.000030679545,0.47772345,0.0008254589,0.000044546396,5.897699e-7,0.0012714531,0.0000037447273,0.0000059889344,0.00083604397,0.5191153,0.00009613103],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8704151,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8796819,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5113453,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013868746,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008419378,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99998957},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W138226371","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1261","title":"A Reply on \"Charter Dialogue Revisited\"","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Political science; Law and economics; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.02461080390444508,"score_gpt":0.30957070772371026,"score_spread":0.28495990381926517,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W138226371","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005693181,0.00015241462,0.0008055221,0.0053888517,0.00080543413,0.0001023361,0.0000031347677,0.00006410745,0.986985],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99108356,0.00021576243,0.00024095131,0.0038836233,0.0026825848,0.0000011219789,0.0000023682715,0.000013205026,0.0018767976],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984044,0.00013475637,0.0003095099,0.00017170812,0.00054322026,0.00043643394],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99911296,0.00011846613,0.00016132512,0.00016600988,0.00013630342,0.00030496012],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025978878,0.00010614461,0.00014718794,0.000076683384,0.001343133,0.00023123035,0.00020372249,0.00009976193,0.0007122597],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009372734,0.000094107425,0.0001376773,0.00014994606,0.0001288681,0.00025494854,0.000018024735,0.0003844923,0.00019362524],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007254154,0.00007705227,0.0007026442,0.0000028742845,0.000022588218,0.0001215882,0.0038533711,0.0000017512772,0.00017115992,0.9622433,0.00590626,0.026824852],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035802496,0.00014484188,0.0026311704,0.00006786958,0.00001766481,0.000055231634,0.0005702744,0.000003088538,0.00013428682,0.01908788,0.9767779,0.0001517793],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019534582,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06646223,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9853904,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012960208,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000050097333,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99995697},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1480424489","doi":"","title":"Heading for the Light: International Relocation from Canada","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Relocation; Statute; Supreme court; Law; Legislature; Political science; Geography","score_opus":0.020781188502298226,"score_gpt":0.2669756940476203,"score_spread":0.24619450554532205,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1480424489","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.55820423,0.007913247,0.11037555,0.17691636,0.015797986,0.0011252192,0.00003591676,0.00011796388,0.12951353],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99548507,0.0012208504,0.000049051618,0.00016982123,0.0011704344,0.0000066944663,0.000002744014,0.0000055342307,0.0018897819],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989338,0.00003536745,0.00012221134,0.00007503682,0.00023221246,0.00060137955],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99964267,0.00006384779,0.00009001793,0.000056123412,0.00010682265,0.00004050025],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010178402,0.000044885273,0.00004579296,0.000021679243,0.00071869674,0.00004661489,0.0002554878,0.00003110398,0.00012316665],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008062596,0.000033748183,0.000042155818,0.000057222078,0.000023328168,0.00013718214,0.000008783188,0.00033235553,0.0000025928941],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007262081,0.000025569892,0.0050689364,5.413312e-7,0.00020879217,7.3353453e-7,0.0096445205,0.00000468354,0.0001150136,0.87777424,0.0018372745,0.105247065],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030573184,0.000054391916,0.004898533,0.00000965082,0.000037616697,0.000007904251,0.01714509,0.00013337762,0.0001186738,0.15403976,0.8231456,0.00010364221],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.72816896,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97126395,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8213084,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011302887,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036280423,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6435991},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1482254455","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1146","title":"Appendix A: Supreme Court of Canada Cases Written by Justice Bertha Wilson 1982-1991","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Economic Justice; Law; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.03389982151679562,"score_gpt":0.29481558853046325,"score_spread":0.26091576701366764,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1482254455","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.066234864,0.51772946,0.0001131387,0.065426074,0.0036960223,0.0044972156,0.0013696969,0.00044340396,0.3404901],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.77089655,0.21581398,0.00013946087,0.0052227834,0.0006190347,0.000058524653,0.00029381644,0.000052820804,0.006903036],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99677396,0.00031250087,0.00068987627,0.00040740825,0.0011787856,0.000637466],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99822927,0.0002893835,0.00030984913,0.0004592739,0.00036671472,0.00034549972],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009960078,0.00027433079,0.0007129923,0.00003104302,0.0009692688,0.000029170225,0.0004925302,0.0001273457,0.0016857722],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00031970738,0.00026355346,0.00019315464,0.00037869797,0.00043646267,0.0003115797,0.0000705124,0.00023173452,0.000062823354],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024448076,0.0001646909,0.0010615521,0.0021157707,0.00010474298,0.0001442704,0.0011086948,0.0000032667667,0.0001470686,0.028834997,0.96283305,0.0034574326],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021345376,0.00006226895,0.00019092642,0.0011074686,0.0002736588,0.000045924393,0.00018950818,0.000009452044,0.00006775241,0.000039264596,0.9975023,0.00029796743],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8322778,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.80815035,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.70466167,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027625525,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009760693,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99998164},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1482624622","doi":"","title":"Foreword: Transdisciplinary Conflicts of Law","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Discipline; Doctrine; Sociology; Politics; Context (archaeology); Field (mathematics); Interdisciplinarity; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.06637315951268648,"score_gpt":0.3348678872722926,"score_spread":0.26849472775960614,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1482624622","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.42151734,0.00003998911,0.0002163923,0.00094663556,0.00009669792,0.000074918455,0.0000030223366,0.000044348784,0.57706064],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9878866,0.00009619839,0.00019204715,0.0001530561,0.00010175067,0.0000029218274,0.0000013321951,0.0000037246716,0.011562391],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99939805,0.000029384688,0.00012883527,0.00008489532,0.00022037263,0.00013848789],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997206,0.000039613275,0.000031799365,0.000083820414,0.00005546795,0.000068731424],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001727862,0.00004315829,0.00009211114,0.000023791486,0.00036990803,0.0000037584434,0.00009309947,0.00005766871,0.00077439775],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000006778535,0.00003897904,0.000060836363,0.000094572104,0.000398239,0.00012150353,0.000010248534,0.000041990854,0.000018156632],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017329345,0.000061186794,0.00087620574,0.0000048537795,0.000009132918,0.000005026092,0.11299585,0.0000022369802,0.00028555305,0.88390976,0.00065389,0.0011789876],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003635442,0.0001032805,0.011037299,0.00001065472,0.000010200676,0.0000038783496,0.0033490018,0.000039788487,0.001624103,0.0029057506,0.9804259,0.000126615],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038584168,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030090937,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.979772,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001190167,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004740174,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.84791124},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1482687590","doi":"","title":"(Still) A \"Real and Substantial\" Mess: The Law of Jurisdiction in Canada","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Roger Williams University - Digital Commons (Roger Williams University)","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Supreme court; Law; Plaintiff; Personal jurisdiction; Original jurisdiction; Tort; Political science; Test (biology); Exclusive jurisdiction; Liability","score_opus":0.008385995887342462,"score_gpt":0.18634015840235252,"score_spread":0.17795416251501006,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1482687590","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8574417,0.000068150955,0.000058753947,0.0019713507,0.00018185031,0.00047772378,0.0001225576,0.0000764185,0.13960148],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9950637,0.0005527816,0.000019291314,0.000053139458,0.00003641006,4.5160994e-7,0.000023342314,0.0000166504,0.0042342152],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979603,0.00022775533,0.00026355713,0.00042413594,0.00056114426,0.0005631013],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985385,0.000295232,0.00022281264,0.00037414688,0.00024651753,0.00032280368],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00017907063,0.00026763207,0.0003811509,0.00031798385,0.0006896086,0.00015443083,0.0006474643,0.00017384409,0.00011356689],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000021289274,0.0002768977,0.00014803818,0.0013818973,0.0009856105,0.0019110596,0.0002712393,0.00032015174,0.000012397688],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00031112466,0.00043996968,0.37097317,0.00006254278,0.0003811599,0.00038712358,0.013177055,0.00014504469,0.00021500544,0.5968437,0.0029155812,0.014148517],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014310881,0.000097411066,0.036754653,0.000099569486,0.00011909297,0.000007035725,0.041271325,0.00017801758,0.00012120786,0.0005093881,0.918818,0.00059322646],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9126258,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9411021,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9159024,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010707907,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008683254,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999683},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1483392136","doi":"10.21991/c9tq11","title":"ABORIGINAL AND TREATY RIGHTS - RECONCILING POWERS AND DUTIES: A COMMENT ON HORSEMAN, SIOUI AND SPARROW","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Sparrow; Treaty; Political science; Law; Ecology","score_opus":0.02812045969686056,"score_gpt":0.28528189733142384,"score_spread":0.2571614376345633,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1483392136","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5178489,0.0027604327,0.0048428816,0.025606442,0.00259866,0.0014696984,0.00029642112,0.0003775608,0.44419897],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964414,0.0009072242,0.0005638558,0.0015701979,0.0001277519,0.000038196584,0.000020192932,0.0000063177345,0.00032486467],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99804085,0.00009327285,0.00037268986,0.0005332084,0.00038739212,0.00057260256],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99892384,0.00018296405,0.0001401755,0.00018049938,0.00016100999,0.0004115395],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005169653,0.00029327496,0.00031027893,0.00020355976,0.0030686464,0.00014644265,0.0001246518,0.00020813613,0.00027249713],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008293064,0.00027336902,0.00007576493,0.00016627688,0.0075795427,0.00060907955,0.000053350897,0.00023258742,0.000021839782],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012478973,0.000081287115,0.022403862,0.000011869156,0.000052609954,0.000022158887,0.0024491744,0.0000034902964,0.000017883065,0.9719638,0.0014286762,0.0014403866],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017102633,0.00026374604,0.0032292567,0.0002351792,0.00009203223,0.00013998603,0.005758114,0.00014239497,0.00012784208,0.042697657,0.9450757,0.0005278441],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031415604,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025603902,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.943647,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017731685,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005250757,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99997187},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1493643925","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511770678.006","title":"<i>Logos biou</i>: law's life stories","year":2010,"lang":"he","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Logos Bible Software; Subjectivity; Linguistics; Philosophy; Sociology; Epistemology; Theology","score_opus":0.030486692915942346,"score_gpt":0.23327123926433646,"score_spread":0.2027845463483941,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1493643925","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0018306607,0.00025292084,0.00012801639,0.0003721028,0.0033073945,0.0007825379,0.0005338974,0.00031437207,0.9924781],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.041096225,0.00091399875,0.000090009584,0.0004611713,0.0017578054,0.0000012703271,0.00005050517,0.00007108663,0.95555794],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99683696,0.00017376484,0.00040301005,0.0009649035,0.0008630261,0.00075831433],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970246,0.00020404378,0.0005571174,0.0008448964,0.00053047907,0.00083886797],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00044251693,0.00068667764,0.0007684477,0.00020049099,0.0025797826,0.00027423154,0.0011152119,0.0015715527,0.00014721838],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004409988,0.0008416479,0.00055108574,0.000030941093,0.002855546,0.0003236671,0.0005878496,0.0015164705,0.00015380932],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014442121,0.000027871813,0.000011105473,0.000061936,0.0002139636,0.0001409101,0.0020350518,2.8644513e-7,0.00034339115,0.9884466,0.007373762,0.0012007159],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00069711695,0.000116794916,0.00005616925,0.00013447953,0.0004689376,0.000005198577,0.0009772851,0.000005430131,0.00032366952,0.000025465239,0.9963014,0.0008880574],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021072628,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00090815214,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98892766,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002728297,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005336106,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998581},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1494327544","doi":"","title":"The Incorporation of International Customary Norms in Canadian Common Law (L'incorporation de la coutume internationale en common law canadienne)","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Doctrine; Customary international law; Common law; Political science; Supreme court; Foundation (evidence); International law; Public international law","score_opus":0.0075078298125198836,"score_gpt":0.25784421798828705,"score_spread":0.25033638817576714,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1494327544","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93759483,0.00028723717,0.00016752146,0.0048910063,0.00045135219,0.00016508573,0.000010750836,0.000016649068,0.056415595],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.995838,0.0026745924,0.0000253456,0.00019276702,0.00033492534,0.000008400167,0.00002738568,0.0000114893055,0.0008870827],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99768263,0.0004318534,0.00039098813,0.000119561366,0.00037735698,0.0009976301],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99903536,0.0002277687,0.00028519696,0.000104115774,0.0001720395,0.00017553722],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004437123,0.000102230646,0.00013471014,0.00016167652,0.0010032717,0.00009341206,0.00043553804,0.0001318927,0.000024048566],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000072606694,0.00009110895,0.00006705271,0.0002029322,0.00039700768,0.0004571991,0.000023620385,0.0008750397,0.0000045610086],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034338944,0.00003335795,0.069707446,0.0000010848065,0.000035176898,0.000012785864,0.003856809,0.00014918277,0.00004434533,0.92311656,0.000094340074,0.0029145519],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011415756,0.00021682649,0.09595793,0.00005986931,0.000026042322,0.00041558905,0.006567793,0.0016005666,0.00009116308,0.57374716,0.31984964,0.0003258674],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.92243695,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99930066,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.34936944,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0053738924,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0061769574,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994571},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1498872387","doi":"","title":"Citizenship, Public and Private","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law and Contemporary Problems","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Citizenship; Private law; Political science; Law; Argument (complex analysis); Immigration; Public law; International law; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.08418545540329092,"score_gpt":0.2658189085034144,"score_spread":0.18163345310012347,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1498872387","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.39402547,0.0023166172,0.000036532252,0.0055362037,0.00010495708,0.0002447424,0.0000034518932,0.00012060796,0.5976114],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9945416,0.00082906237,0.00004385065,0.0008544833,0.00011955486,0.000014536124,0.0000041945586,0.000007238566,0.003585468],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992379,0.000080188875,0.00014376914,0.00018687872,0.00016228823,0.00018896603],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996163,0.00004001262,0.00005217934,0.000087880624,0.00003768021,0.00016591478],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00032961846,0.00008112986,0.00012249108,0.000027209757,0.00087059004,0.00010322995,0.0000679424,0.00007568134,0.000038699276],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000013609479,0.000075165655,0.00002349302,0.00009016336,0.00051935756,0.0002965781,0.000039288752,0.000084484374,0.000005389108],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007943433,0.00001781415,0.030902594,0.000014209911,0.000017441778,0.000012170976,0.0049859476,4.1522597e-8,0.000113183574,0.96066636,0.0013818521,0.001880431],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00040784857,0.00005389268,0.0060445615,0.000017727272,0.0000032363553,0.0000114000595,0.00025057318,0.00000884148,0.000015912328,0.02316085,0.9698878,0.00013738695],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014338226,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00037983543,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9685059,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000008939457,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006612125,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.66959625},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1502707216","doi":"","title":"從加拿大最高法院CCH Canadian Ltd. v. Law Society of Upper Canada案探討加拿大圖書館提供文獻傳遞服務與自助式影印服務之侵權責任(上)","year":2012,"lang":"zh","type":"article","venue":"智慧財產權","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.02147692411295192,"score_gpt":0.27776519141566447,"score_spread":0.25628826730271254,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1502707216","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08527351,0.004809475,0.000017629047,0.014920459,0.004193115,0.0005176651,0.00027645624,0.00006885243,0.88992286],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98106796,0.0009863283,0.00019675046,0.002659451,0.001825442,0.000010345711,0.000022256463,0.000037120546,0.013194374],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967452,0.00017342322,0.00049971254,0.0003320603,0.0007687018,0.0014808526],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976736,0.0001052402,0.00022144738,0.00043318796,0.00023901262,0.0013275236],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011868873,0.00029663823,0.00041697684,0.000066985776,0.0011047628,0.00009146179,0.00042627924,0.00046018497,0.0034728902],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003633397,0.00031605488,0.00040674253,0.00055579643,0.0006616185,0.00053973024,0.00007074579,0.00035517482,0.0002141109],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001754491,0.00023762092,0.07959032,0.00014402886,0.0002636608,0.000004099155,0.0746032,0.000004601228,0.00036325032,0.7148144,0.11970192,0.010255296],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027286142,0.000047156696,0.023972433,0.00005495764,0.00009990064,0.0000030645213,0.0053136367,0.000037748225,0.0002191468,0.00048126906,0.9691263,0.00037156098],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97521544,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.93163776,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8957944,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007640656,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016621836,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99992913},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1502825396","doi":"","title":"Jurisdiction and the Enforcement of Foreign Judgments","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Roger Williams University - Digital Commons (Roger Williams University)","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Supreme court; Law; Enforcement; Context (archaeology); Subject-matter jurisdiction; Personal jurisdiction; Original jurisdiction; Political science; History","score_opus":0.009999391177054026,"score_gpt":0.19920723389060857,"score_spread":0.18920784271355454,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1502825396","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.494435,0.00009838064,0.0010572997,0.00236787,0.00023071902,0.0012209734,0.00011679043,0.00020548607,0.50026745],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97432923,0.0005056859,0.00005609924,0.000071371265,0.00005347445,8.9210545e-7,0.000038666534,0.00001714575,0.024927435],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99797875,0.00022630511,0.0002659508,0.00041625212,0.0005946452,0.00051809003],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998391,0.00026682185,0.00028724378,0.00041856116,0.000305156,0.00033126367],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00027719367,0.0002789049,0.00039588517,0.0004156223,0.0013333525,0.00022093837,0.0006568679,0.00020506227,0.00034388306],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000036700356,0.00026855056,0.00028970095,0.001016784,0.0016836064,0.0022078871,0.0003989053,0.00025762376,0.00005548713],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00047177108,0.00036038828,0.051359415,0.000039616258,0.0005019242,0.000045246466,0.006459023,0.000054505974,0.000059739454,0.9203159,0.004615143,0.015717303],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003362486,0.00013526712,0.0025671413,0.00006929623,0.00020638168,0.0000046309033,0.018642526,0.0001890863,0.00010484137,0.0021183612,0.9721552,0.0004447524],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0069582816,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00073122355,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9675401,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00035424085,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015143906,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999767},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1504181684","doi":"","title":"Global Problems in Domestic Courts","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Raymond and Beverly Sackler Institute for Biological, Physical and Engineering Sciences, Yale University; York University; Yale University; Carnegie Corporation of New York; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Business; Political science; Law and economics; Law; Economics","score_opus":0.028655749687731706,"score_gpt":0.29056532110783745,"score_spread":0.26190957142010574,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1504181684","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.40551695,0.00030320737,0.00009763331,0.0005362993,0.00066297455,0.00032831004,0.0000073955694,0.00014913708,0.5923981],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975402,0.000075006596,0.00023308943,0.0003308256,0.00022750138,0.000024955492,0.000002194692,0.0000073395277,0.0015589353],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987654,0.000109953595,0.00020990189,0.00022712287,0.0003101861,0.00037744534],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99945885,0.00002758553,0.000062395,0.0001768588,0.000057171983,0.00021715797],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005670797,0.00010064019,0.00014072082,0.000032033095,0.0002549108,0.000073779614,0.0002278478,0.00011719587,0.0012464823],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000080942074,0.000101502395,0.00005327382,0.00028217747,0.00019433098,0.0003071201,0.000038519323,0.00012269439,0.0003208834],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025571197,0.00022793593,0.1572982,0.00001728584,0.000016676417,0.000060454113,0.008158049,0.000021356744,0.000028344684,0.8277422,0.0015021438,0.0049017235],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00078391965,0.00010656129,0.22860953,0.00008686468,0.000019473497,0.000007862912,0.00078250305,0.000023776047,0.000015368412,0.06280437,0.7064187,0.0003410564],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.064352535,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10481576,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7649379,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017860619,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014468259,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996665},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1505147135","doi":"10.1017/cbo9781139058933.006","title":"Placer Dome Inc.","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"","keywords":"Placer mining; Dome (geology); Geology; Mining engineering; Geochemistry; Paleontology","score_opus":0.030284985455280064,"score_gpt":0.23605018433406122,"score_spread":0.20576519887878114,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1505147135","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00011404302,0.00030875579,0.000050144918,0.000069000664,0.0005963608,0.00032771222,0.00012853228,0.00019438425,0.9982111],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0034639584,0.0005672233,0.000021802025,0.000068591005,0.00083741365,4.709866e-7,0.00003235367,0.000030376563,0.99497783],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987178,0.000060937462,0.00013380453,0.0003036681,0.00041223448,0.00037155737],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99899006,0.00007101395,0.00017927334,0.00031024741,0.00015468795,0.00029471636],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00024035024,0.0002368179,0.00027414982,0.00014148338,0.00063665165,0.000060001064,0.00038919167,0.00052275776,0.00011411307],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000008225735,0.0002934273,0.00016942025,0.000007659841,0.000451565,0.00016541212,0.00020362448,0.0003876104,0.00010580861],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039083057,0.0000068964414,0.0000050713243,0.000015100704,0.000062068626,0.000038313516,0.000783506,1.2559786e-7,0.0000067485244,0.9560618,0.03765972,0.0053215893],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002685726,0.000017657381,0.000031835403,0.00004789602,0.00015291046,0.0000019137783,0.00013734854,0.000001553347,0.000011814871,0.000011673772,0.99898493,0.00033188012],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038175352,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00013701462,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9613252,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00037213363,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019828248,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999518},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1512866983","doi":"","title":"Foreign Official Immunity and the 'Baseline' Problem","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Fordham law review","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Statutory law; Doctrine; Law; Personal jurisdiction; Political science; Universal jurisdiction; State (computer science); Common law; State immunity; Customary international law; Qualified immunity; International law; Sovereign immunity; Public international law; Constitution","score_opus":0.05194192873920622,"score_gpt":0.304862104085157,"score_spread":0.2529201753459508,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1512866983","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0012125468,0.050850946,0.00028979545,0.0026438488,0.00013476002,0.0012969435,0.0000049477667,0.000085308886,0.9434809],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7547436,0.23350085,0.0012534922,0.0076653175,0.000646531,0.00022049485,0.000012003369,0.000027454123,0.0019302693],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989307,0.00038109245,0.00022789021,0.00011115887,0.00017065418,0.0001785384],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99948245,0.00009773068,0.00009912554,0.00018009101,0.00007941865,0.00006119863],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027549535,0.00008008366,0.00020979544,0.000008796736,0.000673057,0.000030844385,0.00018030182,0.000044127064,0.00060594076],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010122619,0.000049733037,0.000098514574,0.00013272178,0.00047084276,0.00012482208,0.000048400438,0.000112223555,0.000032391472],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000144726255,0.000019668008,0.000037398808,0.00014372497,0.000008956205,6.1375886e-7,0.0015418843,1.2278967e-8,3.3528153e-7,0.96234363,0.00077569403,0.035113603],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002284405,0.00002687268,0.000106729305,0.00039124172,0.00006053707,0.000002058001,0.00015225021,0.000004426283,0.0000035521612,0.018551564,0.98039716,0.00007514143],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011877014,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0039514774,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97962147,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001397757,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000051927353,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.994703},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1517374998","doi":"","title":"Vicarious Liability for Sexual Abuse","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Vicarious liability; Liability; Abuse liability; Business; Sexual abuse; Psychology; Criminology; Tort; Psychiatry; Medicine; Medical emergency; Poison control; Suicide prevention; Finance","score_opus":0.015330460112827734,"score_gpt":0.30751584353046674,"score_spread":0.292185383417639,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1517374998","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.971913,0.0007485864,0.012250311,0.0039435374,0.00047527687,0.00027285016,0.0000017986149,0.000073659314,0.010321012],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.984593,0.0035845055,0.0000676639,0.00012826733,0.001338852,0.000009544483,0.0000015935499,0.000011093572,0.010265481],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99759924,0.00009357005,0.00018742304,0.00015180158,0.0002673239,0.0017006572],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999462,0.000085760716,0.00008954539,0.00010391035,0.00014519248,0.00011359811],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002966005,0.00008101847,0.00011340684,0.000048660902,0.00088063057,0.000093651215,0.00020336105,0.000089799076,0.000077000645],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012020114,0.00007601032,0.00009154666,0.00015941184,0.00009144172,0.00020918112,0.00000779372,0.00063474727,0.000015194115],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002576004,0.0002402371,0.017716426,0.000004980101,0.00014710538,0.000004325084,0.020922264,0.000021255764,0.0002600184,0.62955254,0.00048936636,0.33038387],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005896431,0.00036370786,0.0010211695,0.000003503701,0.000031906617,0.00005956732,0.010915507,0.000049310183,0.0000063501634,0.11715249,0.8696642,0.00014267013],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012063634,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03479269,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86917484,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009298935,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018531395,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98281986},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1517882249","doi":"","title":"Personal Jurisdiction over Non-Resident Class Members: Have We Gone Down the Wrong Road?","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Roger Williams University - Digital Commons (Roger Williams University)","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Res judicata; Plaintiff; Personal jurisdiction; Settlement (finance); Law; Political science; Class (philosophy); Test (biology); Business; Computer science","score_opus":0.011543238349911571,"score_gpt":0.22792671017098304,"score_spread":0.21638347182107145,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1517882249","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7696471,0.00007546307,0.00036945558,0.008465084,0.0012259579,0.00082095276,0.0003383762,0.00046969947,0.21858789],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9218908,0.00040252204,0.00004161498,0.00013749851,0.00043649567,9.902901e-7,0.000097984805,0.000049522987,0.0769426],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99602646,0.00028524874,0.0003615568,0.0009512485,0.0012470029,0.0011284885],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99728405,0.00033729756,0.0003808099,0.0008282808,0.00040514182,0.0007643994],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00048149415,0.0005935177,0.0005423169,0.00071319035,0.0035966334,0.0007108534,0.0015198468,0.00061367126,0.0009448634],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006395414,0.00061394944,0.00071927457,0.0016559666,0.0018613624,0.0035352774,0.0006475224,0.001297309,0.00020750077],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0029301802,0.004919348,0.34507608,0.00020648226,0.003930321,0.0038405452,0.12230989,0.0004680541,0.0037114036,0.28981215,0.12766992,0.09512564],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014711064,0.00012510453,0.008596252,0.00006879848,0.00024657496,0.000018762814,0.020066166,0.00043199662,0.00008668108,0.00015076631,0.96797323,0.00076454296],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007884464,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.025866361,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84030336,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009298056,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005523091,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999684},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1518832054","doi":"","title":"Competing Class Actions Across Canada: Still at the Starting Gate after Canada Post v. Lépine","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Jurisdiction; Class (philosophy); Context (archaeology); Law; Political science; History; Artificial intelligence; Computer science","score_opus":0.008370203779381495,"score_gpt":0.26699537673889207,"score_spread":0.2586251729595106,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1518832054","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9408107,0.0009546424,0.000048591995,0.054425634,0.00046928573,0.000099793004,0.00001693548,0.000018749362,0.0031557137],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99363387,0.00050725095,0.00000427967,0.0018469134,0.0006849155,0.000002321631,0.0000031535772,0.000008885947,0.003308387],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99666303,0.00015444685,0.00026830556,0.00014770457,0.0005911083,0.00217543],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992611,0.00009025892,0.00019169,0.00011632706,0.00018665055,0.00015401214],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016028308,0.0001195739,0.00012617093,0.000013506564,0.002458854,0.00012223906,0.0002285545,0.00004544589,0.00014401601],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011167712,0.000093312316,0.00006199363,0.00019046235,0.00007151147,0.00015259848,0.000029171697,0.0011194028,0.0000027186722],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001435831,0.00036075866,0.06019693,0.00002808261,0.0012891861,0.00040877837,0.097980246,0.004361134,0.0065872283,0.13293374,0.018572945,0.67584515],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004356836,0.00012998552,0.028001437,0.000029325161,0.000038918766,0.00010301229,0.04787798,0.00009231135,0.000077143806,0.0018152845,0.9211025,0.00029638773],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9934917,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999893,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9025296,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0068941885,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014298681,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988398},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1523662420","doi":"","title":"Extraterritoriality and Extranationality: A Comparative Study","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Extraterritoriality; Presumption; Indigenous; Political science; International law; Law; Context (archaeology); Sovereignty; Geography; Jurisdiction","score_opus":0.12374301795006006,"score_gpt":0.4215840749916645,"score_spread":0.29784105704160446,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1523662420","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.85801697,0.000073198586,0.00011419213,0.0006189536,0.0005917322,0.0002054394,0.0000012073115,0.000039393595,0.14033893],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977452,0.0000065332783,0.000057823767,0.00003304727,0.0009086525,0.000008815841,7.564711e-7,0.0000011744979,0.0012379538],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993597,0.00016882605,0.00008149756,0.00006935125,0.00019971494,0.000120892466],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997425,0.000059741604,0.000019721812,0.000043213295,0.000043601765,0.00009122778],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008785748,0.00003631495,0.00006553921,0.000015847785,0.00029730907,0.0000501491,0.000032894302,0.000023891645,0.00035693773],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000014488679,0.000031864853,0.00001192485,0.0000635067,0.00007487162,0.00028402326,0.000010110937,0.000031965003,0.0000093016215],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014193827,0.00047923936,0.403481,0.0000015495382,0.000026228612,2.3067176e-7,0.18158638,9.155138e-8,0.00004955699,0.41053835,0.00099478,0.002828385],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002656207,0.000035549125,0.56013924,0.0000010925802,0.000013230964,1.994644e-7,0.03797636,0.000004976136,0.000017746817,0.0009672546,0.400499,0.00007973664],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005905632,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004593712,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4095711,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000023471843,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000022914232,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.89275885},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1526115827","doi":"","title":"Forum Non Conveniens in Quebec: Assessment of a Transplant","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Discretion; Doctrine; Law; Political science; Conflict of laws; Civil procedure; Common law","score_opus":0.014862442950173171,"score_gpt":0.29007396076489245,"score_spread":0.27521151781471925,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1526115827","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94505537,0.0003146376,0.0056400453,0.0010950236,0.000264019,0.00016725893,0.0000019426711,0.00001436096,0.04744733],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9961976,0.0022972862,0.000055829194,0.000027800748,0.00007330263,0.0000029863738,6.5817875e-7,0.0000056602385,0.0013388902],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.998233,0.00009380547,0.00023686558,0.00008813584,0.00024293225,0.0011052628],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99969375,0.000019489764,0.00011976365,0.000060582388,0.00004826254,0.000058163485],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016291209,0.00006404813,0.00013318044,0.00010200663,0.00014500259,0.000015444235,0.00015930668,0.00006421612,0.00011253915],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000075197604,0.00005894648,0.000078979414,0.00014208302,0.000076088014,0.00018415593,0.0000064951582,0.0006094107,0.000002324968],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006710894,0.00021977667,0.11514835,0.00000540858,0.00006509135,0.000009121302,0.03273301,0.0000030078427,0.00056275295,0.8192992,0.000023529537,0.031863604],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0060839467,0.002723891,0.41941884,0.00033862932,0.00019304812,0.00015969272,0.16997273,0.00053970277,0.0010345516,0.34022364,0.058351513,0.0009598155],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07647093,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6211025,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5446316,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000596304,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002780963,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9296789},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1526549200","doi":"","title":"The FG Hemisphere Case in Hong Kong: China's Africa Policy in the Courts of Its First Special Administrative Region","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Mainland China; Appeal; Sovereignty; China; Political science; Government (linguistics); Law; Basic law; Democracy; State (computer science); Power (physics); Public administration; Constitution; Politics","score_opus":0.026965526531290886,"score_gpt":0.31750129764266655,"score_spread":0.2905357711113757,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1526549200","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.909401,0.0043733846,0.000029689367,0.01761563,0.0002801371,0.00029014648,0.0000015563879,0.000007676584,0.0680008],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9893861,0.0065416684,0.0000017210633,0.000020072916,0.0029081097,0.00000559849,2.8340997e-7,0.0000065654717,0.0011298888],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99747455,0.00035937454,0.00027970027,0.000091756505,0.00035291433,0.0014417176],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99936825,0.00019334168,0.00021355879,0.000107072,0.000045129316,0.000072633375],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034470242,0.00009956078,0.00012578706,0.00006179378,0.000813438,0.000075009426,0.00028806564,0.00008334429,0.000029675384],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00024665706,0.00006369883,0.00008041939,0.00041619848,0.00015078223,0.00026762843,0.000019278848,0.0010364087,0.000002996517],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015452046,0.0002547726,0.010170854,0.0000058901887,0.00003890614,0.000109049455,0.1240549,0.000011999441,0.000014307147,0.84016347,0.0007906436,0.024230683],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019544377,0.0007814514,0.05980888,0.00014257732,0.000058363814,0.0043561496,0.28417054,0.00005247824,0.00007824349,0.09839405,0.5497077,0.000495089],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023650704,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14981438,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.74176943,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00076500105,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019019563,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8656993},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1528881838","doi":"","title":"Siting Foreign Law: How Derrida Can Help","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Duke journal of comparative & international law","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Institution; Judaism; Sociology; Law; Classics; History; Political science; Archaeology","score_opus":0.09109940972700245,"score_gpt":0.3394804521501871,"score_spread":0.24838104242318462,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1528881838","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13981149,0.0000774755,0.0007858932,0.0022300137,0.00074265833,0.00007200667,0.000010037388,0.000014598703,0.8562558],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9963812,0.000027126649,0.00073970744,0.00052990636,0.0009967906,0.0000014875726,0.0000032292114,0.0000065282916,0.0013140099],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99861395,0.00014390738,0.0003214335,0.0001027572,0.0006331375,0.00018478285],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983997,0.000112706424,0.0004731219,0.00006275198,0.0008129412,0.00013881411],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005833222,0.00010508584,0.00021321801,0.00008408455,0.00035777187,0.0001445193,0.00036856008,0.0000520072,0.0005283276],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003217905,0.000094367264,0.00015724328,0.000082860155,0.00029557577,0.00059597543,0.000033134133,0.00021064466,0.000012432187],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005876473,0.00005881753,0.0012312599,0.0000011677851,0.00009894354,0.000019801184,0.0135323275,0.000009011969,0.00021974901,0.98389584,0.0006035467,0.00027076883],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00050298375,0.00016542405,0.0028759493,0.00006677405,0.000029203553,0.000037843634,0.007836765,0.00008399213,0.0029534611,0.023935262,0.9613614,0.00015092551],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016134623,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004275211,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96075785,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016031272,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011472233,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5784817},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1532334626","doi":"10.15837/aijjs.v8i2.1187","title":"CONSIDERATIONS REGARDING THE FIRST PRELIMINARY RULING OF THE HIGH COURT OF CASSATION AND JUSTICE","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Agora International Journal of Juridical Sciences","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Law; Political science; Preliminary ruling; Accountability","score_opus":0.02670280495105994,"score_gpt":0.3160015155987504,"score_spread":0.28929871064769047,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1532334626","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9170656,0.00016716724,0.0011056262,0.074768916,0.0015352714,0.000082810315,0.0000032568398,0.000004058057,0.005267273],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99862516,0.00016480249,0.00043347085,0.00028484515,0.0004662349,7.2028934e-7,1.3851415e-7,0.0000016416772,0.000023002558],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983164,0.00015344298,0.000371976,0.0000768689,0.00099269,0.000088643625],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978119,0.0010393467,0.000550664,0.000056168996,0.00049893453,0.000042973134],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025938733,0.00004666212,0.00010615999,0.00006535534,0.0006346895,0.00009097498,0.00038839623,0.000038147435,0.00004444436],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018062056,0.000026189633,0.00006941201,0.00015166211,0.0010605666,0.0002919215,0.0000664894,0.000115728784,3.7468408e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000097607095,0.00016001651,0.031447932,0.000025889542,0.00011880844,0.0000046819796,0.015997117,0.0026488886,0.0013994727,0.9295544,0.0029648968,0.015580284],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0023895963,0.0016371487,0.57667744,0.0013823871,0.0007052985,0.00029829907,0.017630981,0.014661439,0.008355987,0.15500118,0.22077303,0.00048724824],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00063227164,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00033071934,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.77455324,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000031498028,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021945674,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4881583},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1533771626","doi":"","title":"Jurisdiction and Choice of Law Rules for Defamation Actions in Australia Following the Gutnick Case and the Uniform Defamation Legislation","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Australian international law journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Choice of law; Jurisdiction; Law; Conflict of laws; Tort; Damages; Legislation; Plaintiff; Certainty; Publishing; High Court; Harm; Political science; Exclusive jurisdiction; Common law; Project commissioning; Legal certainty; Liability","score_opus":0.06615435756069121,"score_gpt":0.3853155047127825,"score_spread":0.31916114715209126,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1533771626","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96325266,0.000050513212,0.0031980628,0.01024864,0.0012296956,0.00054810796,0.000020073581,0.00001783151,0.021434382],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983316,0.000060505474,0.0004941677,0.00009190569,0.0004883477,0.000012434994,0.00001073299,0.0000065918553,0.0005037059],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987437,0.00011898742,0.00047593555,0.000118509146,0.00035144374,0.00019138375],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987984,0.0005399038,0.0003286239,0.00007219184,0.00019550568,0.00006542063],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027954553,0.00009436379,0.00011787232,0.00010908662,0.0011946348,0.00025947354,0.00012549547,0.00010118529,0.0000314832],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014528575,0.000068319176,0.00009771289,0.00011220757,0.00036501035,0.0009349057,0.000017434042,0.00020422856,0.0000010673393],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000100371566,0.000024568875,0.0024525123,0.000005907591,0.000059898717,0.000008483616,0.0060458314,0.00007895497,0.00019977163,0.98779726,0.00008114104,0.0031453047],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.013842644,0.00030152607,0.12325293,0.0005481529,0.0006796508,0.0021576823,0.035043202,0.003533917,0.0017006794,0.30435804,0.51372474,0.0008568364],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024907038,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.090188384,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6834392,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014816063,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000028259306,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9815862},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1537997761","doi":"10.71781/2285","title":"De la légitimité du recours à l'action déclaratoire dans les litiges du commerce international","year":2002,"lang":"fr","type":"dissertation","venue":"Open MIND","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"McGill University","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Political science; Law; Conflict of laws; International law; Legitimacy; Context (archaeology); Civil procedure; Action (physics); Politics; Geography; Physics","score_opus":0.05807476188364539,"score_gpt":0.3614719832594583,"score_spread":0.3033972213758129,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1537997761","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5353137,0.00017621023,0.00010509783,0.00506392,0.0017883189,0.00030680603,0.00006583324,0.000005729738,0.45717436],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7912554,0.0042473204,0.0009290591,0.00012498615,0.0018705438,0.00007315138,0.00082096667,0.00004599312,0.20063257],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977513,0.0005454522,0.00042427905,0.000471323,0.00046904094,0.0003386369],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986513,0.0003412584,0.00041107906,0.00018023798,0.00024238533,0.00017369301],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00096989237,0.000293737,0.00030036984,0.00011050258,0.0012972441,0.0011300471,0.0008424147,0.00065813126,0.016676258],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016422987,0.00033926527,0.00017860963,0.00023231593,0.00035072456,0.00075435,0.00007914076,0.00049013656,0.00040916368],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007340133,0.00035838582,0.029739333,0.000016910164,0.00014121253,0.000033599972,0.09766497,0.000073224444,0.00052187406,0.002922189,0.0039849915,0.8644699],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003730429,0.00006495109,0.051321134,0.00026170138,0.00012042065,0.000023807535,0.04531654,0.0012360123,0.0006133433,0.0001215035,0.90019244,0.0003551005],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019333417,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.030683424,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89620745,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005565451,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00030165038,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999069},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1538149780","doi":"","title":"Cameras in the Courtroom in the Twenty-First Century: The U.S. Supreme Court Learning from Abroad?","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Political science; Economic Justice; Human rights; Court of record; Original jurisdiction","score_opus":0.024478637445492345,"score_gpt":0.29717299224864313,"score_spread":0.2726943548031508,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1538149780","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7335777,0.000988742,0.000038995113,0.04908703,0.0006060764,0.00050232396,0.0000028997315,0.000043700435,0.2151525],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960487,0.00066951354,0.00001131213,0.0018292001,0.00078559364,0.000028755152,0.000005311946,0.000006809238,0.0006148415],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978114,0.0007626073,0.0001990066,0.00013886888,0.0006413375,0.00044680908],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99888957,0.000739525,0.000070233,0.00022761482,0.000029433817,0.00004360382],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003300516,0.000104285726,0.00011088692,0.0000353796,0.00084076176,0.00020129254,0.00056293077,0.00008781692,0.0009202681],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011238385,0.000049428723,0.00006416924,0.00033716383,0.00017999385,0.00025124312,0.000041252308,0.00048612195,0.00009696723],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021055206,0.00020714481,0.4471251,0.0000020106775,0.000016867963,0.0000026229516,0.484615,0.00006409167,0.000028802333,0.04219921,0.02000992,0.005708154],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014358458,0.000011171701,0.21661171,0.000006913543,0.000008566748,4.838674e-7,0.075551756,0.00007202597,0.0000024300168,0.000145596,0.7073838,0.00006192453],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07467617,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.077010795,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.68737394,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007160736,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004789424,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999993},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1543124388","doi":"","title":"Staking Claims Against Foreign Defendants in Canada: Choice of Law and Jurisdiction Issues Arising from the in Personam Exception to the Mocambique Rule for Foreign Immovables","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Law; Subject-matter jurisdiction; Subject matter; Political science; Original jurisdiction","score_opus":0.025869041149856335,"score_gpt":0.2810066826580067,"score_spread":0.2551376415081504,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1543124388","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9915673,0.002082278,0.0018337663,0.00211314,0.00009983442,0.00039099375,0.00001098287,0.0000073783813,0.0018942952],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99483836,0.0043266555,0.00006128459,0.00028568262,0.00039160988,0.000017367864,0.0000042573256,0.00001192533,0.00006283485],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99808925,0.00019239777,0.00031404497,0.00016567405,0.00033395563,0.00090467685],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99936765,0.00023542058,0.00017301044,0.00009177538,0.00008149289,0.00005066233],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018415311,0.00010783882,0.00017285188,0.00006431352,0.00091776426,0.000049490907,0.00019657204,0.00006860629,0.000006095531],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000076175915,0.000078274345,0.000052958178,0.00020811261,0.00009385068,0.0002476446,0.000020557964,0.0005803058,2.8100416e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00046166088,0.00013822768,0.2995561,0.000019874167,0.00019146515,0.000010004235,0.09152996,0.0025087749,0.0015654452,0.47277975,0.00039439884,0.13084432],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003081795,0.0004960894,0.36340326,0.00042396242,0.00008116257,0.000056177578,0.20601186,0.002771695,0.0005625122,0.36312667,0.059334874,0.0006499532],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8950825,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99446034,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13019437,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001720357,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024552734,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.70587933},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1543518960","doi":"10.54648/aila2014005","title":"Summary of MC99 Judicial Updates 2013","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Air and Space Law","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.009011196931635462,"score_gpt":0.26001413831395365,"score_spread":0.25100294138231816,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1543518960","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.35911497,0.0005015918,0.00012774984,0.022063967,0.00037982693,0.00011131293,0.000004875967,0.00005949359,0.6176362],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970651,0.0005157482,0.000054888667,0.00038798817,0.0002711217,0.0000012596345,0.0000018139276,0.0000031749403,0.0016988505],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995662,0.000047401285,0.00006858404,0.000082574705,0.00012084808,0.000114405746],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997606,0.000052129442,0.000033392025,0.000065013286,0.00003210243,0.000056744742],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00026234682,0.000040844887,0.000090240996,0.000015109074,0.00021047774,0.000015147482,0.00005193338,0.000050686973,0.00007723965],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000015115588,0.000037546375,0.000026382035,0.00005394375,0.00024548927,0.000097178054,0.000019067827,0.000037971884,0.0000102138565],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010551632,0.000019633218,0.006615949,0.000008315536,0.0000076630295,3.0727998e-7,0.0030801687,0.0000013956596,0.00018008357,0.9730534,0.011137524,0.0058850134],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011555756,0.000042393396,0.0041910936,0.000010109635,0.000008233903,1.4026261e-7,0.00036814433,0.000025421677,0.000305701,0.0057095936,0.98917013,0.000053494008],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020873718,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013937861,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9780326,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000051425204,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000014529823,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98564637},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1544830617","doi":"","title":"Canadian Competition Authority’s Reach for Foreign Affiliates in its Cartel Investigations","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Antitrust chronicle","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cartel; Competition (biology); Competition law; Liability; Business; Price fixing; Economics; Law and economics; International trade; Law; Political science; Market economy; Accounting; Industrial organization; Collusion; Monopoly","score_opus":0.029223051190185596,"score_gpt":0.31262913766199263,"score_spread":0.28340608647180704,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1544830617","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8463795,0.00053532264,0.000267305,0.018863702,0.00033866873,0.00087301614,0.000066113185,0.00013436629,0.132542],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99788165,0.000094409676,0.0003153322,0.00044465638,0.00024811877,0.000018851873,0.000046737838,0.0000066247353,0.00094361266],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990562,0.000049770533,0.00016637126,0.00018475973,0.00014459342,0.00039831104],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995157,0.00004222329,0.000041832005,0.0001092172,0.00009446017,0.0001965687],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00042923389,0.000078615594,0.00011177582,0.0001278823,0.00060525606,0.000108261855,0.0001255057,0.00011091404,0.00012710647],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008564708,0.000092194125,0.00005204843,0.00033131478,0.00006852226,0.0004383719,0.000005465409,0.00009330472,0.000024534604],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000060632774,0.0000510801,0.007927574,0.000009546552,0.0000048443912,0.0000030371682,0.0031690213,0.00005887879,0.00061822066,0.9808626,0.0020262566,0.005262833],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016354888,0.0003482963,0.16536112,0.00013795737,0.000038580427,0.0000027124408,0.0036579263,0.0061080363,0.0024825884,0.050791536,0.76884776,0.00058796944],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.20701966,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7599969,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9300711,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00050600717,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006903071,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.79826087},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1549841706","doi":"","title":"Thinking Globally, Acting Locally: Recent Trends in the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments in Canada","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Enforcement; Jurisdiction; Political science; Conflict of laws; Law; Discretion; Comity; Legislature; Law and economics; Economics","score_opus":0.03635448826506476,"score_gpt":0.27538481644073515,"score_spread":0.23903032817567038,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1549841706","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.41195875,0.000034220036,0.000035653193,0.0013297232,0.00005759436,0.00011994642,0.000002891315,0.0000056718472,0.5864555],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994074,0.00009704355,0.000059125286,0.0002909358,0.00003331948,0.000005051549,0.000011895586,0.0000016845567,0.00009351604],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99908906,0.0000712362,0.00019512494,0.000087351604,0.0004039978,0.00015325205],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998013,0.000048359383,0.00006563664,0.00004295257,0.000025282723,0.00001648916],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00082015106,0.0000454738,0.00006896683,0.00005182615,0.000101479134,0.000035434758,0.000096480624,0.000026496924,0.000331326],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001296765,0.000035487297,0.000010847641,0.00027046632,0.000022135,0.00009108166,0.000018924891,0.00005379457,2.2889142e-7],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033497905,0.000075270735,0.093546554,0.0000094901125,0.000007402203,0.000007112451,0.0096784,0.00012143505,0.000021941909,0.04587954,0.0011463694,0.849473],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0035682914,0.00022890847,0.42647898,0.00036466433,0.000047780486,0.0000036286488,0.1540409,0.001970971,0.0007915892,0.077144526,0.33466837,0.0006913621],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99245584,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99850035,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84878165,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00039844096,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001653472,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36277875},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1550097599","doi":"","title":"Developing Case Law: The Future of Consultation and Accommodation","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Doctrine; Law; Accommodation; Duty; Political science; Legal doctrine; Politics; Common law; Psychology","score_opus":0.016873716296613585,"score_gpt":0.2854745660805662,"score_spread":0.2686008497839526,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1550097599","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92898893,0.0013826506,0.000524116,0.008748348,0.0005456907,0.00036009445,0.000013089516,0.000072899806,0.05936416],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980772,0.00011693856,0.0005650061,0.00033978687,0.00060962717,0.000008776806,0.000009868811,0.000004870496,0.00026788987],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99931514,0.00010934787,0.00016706594,0.00011025057,0.0001756433,0.00012252455],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995246,0.00012081116,0.000098295604,0.00009453459,0.00012388466,0.00003790137],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00043052694,0.000060484956,0.00007987972,0.00001782972,0.00075114367,0.00009789762,0.00007063672,0.00007188939,0.00005055838],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000030163797,0.0000486727,0.000023398135,0.00014438067,0.00021424024,0.00028151672,0.000020029098,0.00008595678,0.000007351498],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000064078768,0.000008691285,0.00086884893,0.0000070880756,0.000004694124,0.0000047189883,0.0016201406,0.000006575048,0.00012375411,0.9914115,0.000301338,0.005636236],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00040614392,0.000017172833,0.007515693,0.00002542662,0.000017996537,0.00002816409,0.0053772894,0.000040964645,0.00043168716,0.01825736,0.96775305,0.00012904823],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.040575035,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.108326755,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9731541,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000041683306,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006399876,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9658139},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1553483483","doi":"","title":"Punitive Damages Revisited: Taking the Rationale for Non-Recognition of Foreign Judgments Too Far","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Punitive damages; Supreme court; Law; Political science; Damages; Common law; Jurisprudence; Legislature; Enforcement; Legislation","score_opus":0.040652471374308184,"score_gpt":0.30795637019792793,"score_spread":0.26730389882361977,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1553483483","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5008132,0.00051367946,0.0046855304,0.007821631,0.0004013048,0.0026493531,0.00025558745,0.00011910364,0.48274064],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99270755,0.00016106019,0.0012828265,0.0016982247,0.00084742426,0.00011262706,0.00008066516,0.0000128148895,0.0030968136],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99888957,0.00010285136,0.00026002692,0.00017973657,0.00033830208,0.00022951621],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989821,0.00025067423,0.00023736362,0.00014799343,0.00030473663,0.00007716384],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008248629,0.00009904355,0.0001420752,0.000043046985,0.00080749404,0.000110316054,0.00019240603,0.000082474915,0.00068877474],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00024616363,0.000083689956,0.00010934853,0.0001776903,0.000169253,0.0005194625,0.000028952576,0.00011236275,0.00005756889],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019042133,0.00030798174,0.0030371728,0.00009224269,0.00018820312,0.0000019665001,0.015500424,0.000085629006,0.0040163565,0.76289636,0.014843992,0.19883925],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009995354,0.00012339941,0.0060254885,0.00011850114,0.00008543741,0.000001018974,0.006237096,0.00030364213,0.0045358106,0.008602922,0.97271127,0.00025590576],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013725008,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026125074,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95786726,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007943498,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000081094215,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.75416005},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1554608732","doi":"","title":"General Report on Common Law Countries, New Trends in Procedure","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Civil law (Civil law); Law; Common law; Res judicata; Comparative law; Political science; Jurisprudence; Public law; Municipal law; Private law; Civil procedure; Sociology","score_opus":0.024907821681667736,"score_gpt":0.34494966618783873,"score_spread":0.320041844506171,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1554608732","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24411312,0.00002513244,0.00002395904,0.0050304504,0.0002206191,0.0000617324,5.70996e-7,0.000072260205,0.75045216],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89039457,0.000015020448,0.00008433636,0.001424451,0.0005526974,0.0000013270428,0.000008741075,0.000004947313,0.107513905],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990872,0.000018523264,0.00019917096,0.0001503374,0.00030581473,0.00023891419],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99968094,0.000026425827,0.00005008253,0.000107300155,0.000025767107,0.00010950919],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00075225654,0.0000622692,0.0000939234,0.000080139565,0.00018246213,0.00004786527,0.000078905454,0.00009340069,0.0007381146],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000011928952,0.000056147903,0.000031281492,0.00028174746,0.00006957736,0.00010864139,0.00000979621,0.00009000707,0.000017882872],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005096274,0.00006362553,0.041524988,0.0000018929006,0.000004755572,0.00013473695,0.004162248,0.0000059440376,0.000020948133,0.90016556,0.02619827,0.027666051],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001830105,0.0000389683,0.05078836,0.0000065322574,0.0000024820167,0.0000050518133,0.00022468845,0.0000066435177,0.00012208452,0.0009762233,0.9475651,0.00008087611],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06694185,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.40263745,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9213668,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011415629,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010443375,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.93927145},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1557609286","doi":"","title":"Book Review: Agreements on Jurisdictions and Choice of Law by Adrian Briggs, Oxford University Press","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Choice of law; Jurisdiction; Law; Legislature; Conflict of laws; Political science; Commonwealth; Nothing; Common law; Subject matter; Freedom of contract; Law and economics; Economics","score_opus":0.008154255014607616,"score_gpt":0.27149145577942946,"score_spread":0.26333720076482187,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1557609286","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1593028,0.27345273,0.0009711362,0.03259923,0.0020982772,0.0015397589,0.00009367691,0.0001757295,0.5297667],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.18765667,0.7749169,0.00001889488,0.0016852167,0.0004330274,0.0000014302949,0.0000055077235,0.0000131391325,0.035269223],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998666,0.00010499736,0.00015388518,0.00012782539,0.00027889802,0.00066839304],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994926,0.00003896622,0.00016266984,0.000104930616,0.00008625034,0.00011460493],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008516018,0.000079465586,0.0001315216,0.00003590212,0.0006453173,0.000026958776,0.00018580005,0.00007377006,0.0001444977],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003278621,0.000078555386,0.000066442815,0.00008305931,0.00016582524,0.00027895442,0.000021130263,0.0009173942,0.0000015634189],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000513635,0.00020280747,0.0010198226,0.00003555645,0.00016794456,0.000001633751,0.0010602926,6.234797e-7,0.0006676033,0.9170116,0.058398023,0.021382699],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031446083,0.00014377724,0.00032230988,0.000063171596,0.000055097098,0.0000068101863,0.00015777655,0.0000027870294,0.000041924974,0.0008629726,0.9979524,0.00007650382],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027584173,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009245207,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9395544,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018816708,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004472652,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.51590425},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1567178154","doi":"","title":"International and Domestic Selective Adaptation: The Case of Charter 08","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Political science; Legitimacy; Normative; Law and economics; Politics; Interpretation (philosophy); Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.014339180715235657,"score_gpt":0.3028290416689316,"score_spread":0.28848986095369594,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1567178154","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96536815,0.0025660868,0.0037493813,0.0067309733,0.00077952887,0.00014707763,0.0000020839086,0.000015988619,0.02064074],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99642074,0.0020236233,0.000022581351,0.000042168303,0.0008066744,0.0000024751516,3.7829946e-7,0.000003735192,0.0006776339],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990029,0.000102983504,0.00011561342,0.00005025128,0.00014697456,0.00058131816],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99962133,0.00008158005,0.00010027819,0.000037252066,0.00010669115,0.000052861098],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016478678,0.00004542504,0.0000569048,0.000042095493,0.00040309405,0.00003402324,0.00008214821,0.000031723674,0.000068194895],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006740831,0.000032640764,0.00003426177,0.00009406667,0.00010529443,0.00026926075,0.000011454116,0.00039182568,0.000003978141],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000402757,0.00006357486,0.0045076115,0.0000016258531,0.00016618626,0.000009108195,0.056375753,0.000007835884,0.000066035886,0.79398847,0.000094942065,0.14467858],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0026319982,0.00080687826,0.026276413,0.000051112955,0.00033203576,0.021591939,0.34533808,0.0013061118,0.00008650345,0.27519026,0.32580498,0.0005836941],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00081358844,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031226075,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.51879823,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022143527,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00044277313,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3100314},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1575560588","doi":"","title":"Tales, Techs and Territories: Private International Law, Globalization and the Legal Construction of Borderlessness on the Internet","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law and Contemporary Problems","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ontario Tech University","funders":"","keywords":"Narrative; Rhetorical question; The Internet; Relation (database); Globalization; Political science; Law; Sociology; Law and economics; Media studies; Literature; Art; Computer science","score_opus":0.02231019237107384,"score_gpt":0.24536371277368973,"score_spread":0.2230535204026159,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1575560588","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.69225335,0.0014312774,0.00037281454,0.012913016,0.00069449074,0.00081067,0.000033117583,0.0000668928,0.29142433],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99847037,0.0005899541,0.000024099047,0.00037708174,0.00011364892,0.00001840113,0.000009204806,0.000004317751,0.00039295497],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992801,0.00011411286,0.0001879226,0.00014272425,0.00019643892,0.00007870442],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999615,0.00008737442,0.00012501981,0.00007895315,0.0000617111,0.000031947446],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00037749688,0.00007949074,0.00011886357,0.000015538653,0.00043096012,0.00010598978,0.00009955732,0.000058550464,0.000008340163],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001791225,0.00004905617,0.000020677982,0.00006312999,0.0019292748,0.00029125743,0.000048677706,0.00007650876,2.3268377e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007105369,0.000014011495,0.0064995787,0.000009368926,0.000022616447,9.1215657e-7,0.0042744437,4.531406e-7,0.000020179841,0.9882196,0.00006450009,0.0008032882],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012897803,0.00008664654,0.0022498476,0.000114645925,0.00001323046,0.000024778097,0.0024168992,0.00020445295,0.00013980686,0.03105609,0.9622756,0.00012819842],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01530878,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026535143,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96221113,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000011777778,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003235124,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99124837},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1575733700","doi":"","title":"Issue #8 - March 17, 2004","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pro Tem","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Autonomy; Newspaper; Media studies; Art history; Humanities; Art; Political science; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.02734815451259263,"score_gpt":0.32702851939578614,"score_spread":0.2996803648831935,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1575733700","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09132427,0.0009099666,0.0008761656,0.058265988,0.0011582016,0.00067295885,0.000005846136,0.00040564014,0.84638095],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9624405,0.00007444234,0.00041438884,0.000365296,0.00086934573,0.000019448837,0.0000020733316,0.0000071842137,0.035807323],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993948,0.000023014089,0.00007741805,0.00010877914,0.00021177428,0.00018426696],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997728,0.00001297659,0.000022991571,0.00008386674,0.000038767124,0.000068630994],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00028003965,0.00004223717,0.000055252374,0.000026371163,0.00028203492,0.000047414083,0.00010465717,0.000050559735,0.0006633988],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000029441244,0.000040543655,0.000029436946,0.00013997544,0.00007281838,0.00010573015,0.00001675936,0.00006527429,0.00030603184],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007620667,0.0005643188,0.01307521,0.00007319018,0.000067238885,0.00005296051,0.11707404,0.0001275695,0.0017612383,0.40251997,0.0801802,0.38442788],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015612361,0.000024269506,0.0017759078,0.0000105455465,0.0000034258185,4.906478e-7,0.0005764129,0.0000022398578,0.00021332577,0.0034380495,0.99373794,0.0000612559],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003302576,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001198761,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91355777,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000864942,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013094072,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7263752},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1583191926","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1195","title":"Freedom of Expression and Location: Are There Constitutional Dead Zones?","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Charter; Law; Commonwealth; Freedom of expression; Political science; Government (linguistics); High Court; Scope (computer science); Expression (computer science); Section (typography); Philosophy; Human rights; Business","score_opus":0.028745747575105944,"score_gpt":0.31092291435199476,"score_spread":0.2821771667768888,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1583191926","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08422571,0.404434,0.0036559354,0.03991302,0.0038384404,0.0032079043,0.00011229898,0.0003190185,0.46029368],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9750332,0.023518426,0.0005210001,0.0003764632,0.00028451026,0.00001866651,0.000007902112,0.0000045113497,0.00023526956],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991686,0.00007947133,0.00020981094,0.00014317378,0.0002838537,0.00011508853],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991874,0.00006380995,0.0001447996,0.00017108784,0.00035075608,0.00008215656],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005900224,0.000074969306,0.00019315368,0.0000130856215,0.00030071853,0.000023546296,0.00012221302,0.00007624771,0.0008469258],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015694994,0.00006276554,0.000043163724,0.00013877192,0.0009915107,0.00017280466,0.000030239977,0.000118056916,0.000019026149],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000032744567,0.000035399476,0.0019329117,0.0004783798,0.000007336688,0.0000013151073,0.00018229069,5.1715807e-7,0.0006189781,0.990738,0.0025609082,0.003440731],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012189964,0.000010754153,0.0016188625,0.0018134947,0.000030772004,0.000003229443,0.00006941871,0.000004892,0.0000796522,0.00095883536,0.99520224,0.00008592888],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00064780726,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023808235,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9926413,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000011187714,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013953018,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9273243},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1586401760","doi":"10.1515/9783866539471","title":"Ausländisches Privat- und Privatverfahrensrecht in deutscher Sprache","year":2011,"lang":"de","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.06061242321787522,"score_gpt":0.3173953480208124,"score_spread":0.25678292480293713,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1586401760","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0069724424,0.0038268578,0.00012001177,0.0016095797,0.0022911208,0.0011812119,0.000022571767,0.00021799137,0.9837582],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0422882,0.0061032833,0.0011956071,0.0005287172,0.002713295,0.00006234456,0.00011286645,0.00013784152,0.94685787],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99505657,0.00045415328,0.0011198455,0.0011572664,0.0010594903,0.0011526892],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976212,0.00034888642,0.00061715156,0.0008000339,0.00018686961,0.0004259061],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001963989,0.0007886867,0.0009618188,0.00046994488,0.000528574,0.00026896276,0.0010988083,0.0018353208,0.016876874],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021220319,0.0007542866,0.00041882187,0.0006032767,0.00090940663,0.0005547772,0.00041650294,0.0014621208,0.0050212005],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025298077,0.0010025697,0.022379257,0.00026690314,0.0009539914,0.00015248878,0.046290085,0.0000031059838,0.00018155556,0.8258707,0.0431233,0.059523076],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00057502993,0.00014744583,0.007995086,0.00030880127,0.000289967,0.0000013942807,0.0005384465,0.000012377813,0.0001756662,0.006789888,0.98221,0.0009559305],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008758831,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011094948,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9390867,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006842021,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014608882,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994908},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1588678454","doi":"","title":"Gérald Goldstein et Ethel Groffier. \"Traité de droit civil -Droit international privé\".","year":2004,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law; Philosophy; Humanities","score_opus":0.01164960271739483,"score_gpt":0.26798817062653496,"score_spread":0.2563385679091401,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1588678454","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7275173,0.0016997065,0.034570113,0.040227428,0.003204468,0.0004705984,0.00017359543,0.0002876954,0.19184908],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8875619,0.0019968785,0.0026046876,0.0050358037,0.0017860744,0.00004345307,0.00007306265,0.000078762816,0.10081939],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99646956,0.00026236297,0.0005801301,0.00064804277,0.00090502895,0.0011348639],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99836904,0.00023495729,0.00030823573,0.00038273667,0.00016535782,0.0005396519],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016512554,0.0003731501,0.00041411896,0.00020282374,0.0006241432,0.00032669303,0.0008744752,0.0010436638,0.0012375416],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002883207,0.0005075734,0.0004287117,0.000542158,0.0013811045,0.0006673615,0.000098957986,0.0012827434,0.00031668326],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006361742,0.00030027394,0.0013904957,0.000051368508,0.00020311475,0.00013489106,0.035974737,0.0010840774,0.00085831236,0.9055403,0.0009770298,0.053421788],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018221876,0.00023596169,0.015571675,0.00035066134,0.00016859874,0.00012826265,0.0031977051,0.00066921685,0.0006257152,0.39683023,0.5795826,0.0008172352],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0074525457,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0120685175,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.57860553,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005159599,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007006087,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99973756},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W159121398","doi":"","title":"Introductory Note - Supreme Court of Canada: R. v. Hape","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Legal Materials","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.011599351063382408,"score_gpt":0.2886310946262413,"score_spread":0.2770317435628589,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W159121398","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.88355416,0.000019874373,0.00017194943,0.008140208,0.0076998523,0.00010108682,0.000079799014,0.000029186192,0.100203894],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9937714,0.000012061196,0.0001145267,0.00019447884,0.0018340113,0.0000016747787,0.000013756015,0.0000059742492,0.004052149],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988257,0.000039550654,0.00029208904,0.00011776224,0.00054519624,0.00017969593],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994257,0.0000654732,0.00012719876,0.000079444835,0.0002400119,0.000062172614],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010052747,0.000061012874,0.000113744114,0.00005607504,0.00010231281,0.00005185683,0.00021762405,0.000048207014,0.002520143],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020303586,0.000062679595,0.000025281493,0.000050609873,0.00009494339,0.00017369681,0.000030782066,0.000039319817,0.000009563799],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002775768,0.0000850038,0.001609293,0.000015694799,0.00008194127,0.00003445329,0.0028799798,0.000010423304,0.5553051,0.40843025,0.028022531,0.0032477053],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012870683,0.000011911694,0.01951361,0.000011204944,0.000005263657,0.0000017076965,0.00013537012,0.0000015746347,0.0825236,0.00027990618,0.89731395,0.00007316484],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.66395026,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.59819704,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8692914,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024540816,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00047213506,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9983917},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1591884389","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v31i1.4321","title":"ASSUMING REGULATORY AUTHORITY FOR TRANSNATIONAL TORTS: AN INTERSTATE AFFAIR? A HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE ON THE CANADIAN PRIVATE INTERNATIONAL LAW TORT RULES","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Tort; Perspective (graphical); Law; Political science; Conflict of laws; Private law; Public authority; Public law; Law and economics; Economics; Liability","score_opus":0.05363717620028837,"score_gpt":0.3399906221544078,"score_spread":0.28635344595411943,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1591884389","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.54908574,0.00003719915,0.0014646337,0.17297484,0.0031413268,0.0023088986,0.00013751694,0.00012335299,0.27072647],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99679834,0.0000023512546,0.00054230855,0.0006647979,0.0006588893,0.00009422117,0.000008173805,0.000013954727,0.0012169497],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99867874,0.00008310194,0.00022018026,0.00025719157,0.00050582975,0.00025492368],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987838,0.0002016721,0.00010060343,0.00016598219,0.0004998138,0.00024808748],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006067471,0.00010790736,0.00013031112,0.00013565215,0.00057876547,0.00025268647,0.0005807537,0.0000942675,0.00044540697],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020929157,0.000096108095,0.000079214464,0.00010564627,0.00014669981,0.00068681664,0.000032764718,0.00013734328,0.000010707577],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000476381,0.000053049516,0.00020818155,0.000008897548,0.000034548197,8.147545e-7,0.009203876,0.000026619384,0.000108738284,0.9873226,0.0020166142,0.0009683693],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005659396,0.00038166367,0.050619375,0.00008460702,0.00017277873,0.0000010955417,0.012446369,0.00095105066,0.00039436953,0.02489887,0.9089907,0.0004931835],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.14728771,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.25657585,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9624238,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020032504,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00033650556,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.85839057},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1597733011","doi":"10.54648/joia2008054","title":"The Implementation of the New York Convention in Canada","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International Arbitration","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Convention; Enforcement; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.019834840425142986,"score_gpt":0.29783089158129056,"score_spread":0.27799605115614756,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1597733011","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97495025,0.0001220031,0.00022077456,0.01553004,0.0018940438,0.000103126134,0.0000018992779,0.0000014980022,0.0071763415],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9988791,0.00022729163,0.000031780677,0.00014488838,0.00031614603,7.887322e-7,9.543068e-7,0.0000016839516,0.00039740046],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988838,0.000077362034,0.0003716437,0.000033098044,0.00057131745,0.0000627707],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99919134,0.00007046605,0.00046022437,0.00003743497,0.00021490046,0.000025645897],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00044079177,0.00003085763,0.000051312283,0.000036133915,0.00018270062,0.000018462202,0.00018189677,0.000016135966,0.000085815314],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006762489,0.000019978626,0.000053598866,0.000118076154,0.000040114643,0.00018141135,0.00000730718,0.000090116126,4.087414e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023395466,0.000101420184,0.70415765,0.000006037642,0.00016142284,0.000011642267,0.029815082,0.0007212204,0.0047342367,0.17320363,0.04253679,0.044316906],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000675453,0.00003889383,0.7630011,0.000035824407,0.000010248565,0.000018292341,0.0076125376,0.00011332831,0.003044087,0.0020583407,0.2233404,0.00005152894],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.70696706,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96216697,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2551999,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004209908,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023619796,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41900507},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1598422837","doi":"10.1016/b978-0-08-097086-8.86123-1","title":"Law and Geography","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Elsevier eBooks","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Geography; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.028008142015385592,"score_gpt":0.2829836082983853,"score_spread":0.2549754662829997,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1598422837","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00001645841,0.0028912432,3.8906578e-7,0.00023528667,0.00039510435,0.00026283544,0.000014046886,0.00008622709,0.9960984],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0014686132,0.00046487365,0.000040397892,0.0004985037,0.0007590312,0.000008073975,0.0000062392264,0.000028171044,0.9967261],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99892557,0.000028308965,0.00017757186,0.0002568133,0.00040383404,0.00020792737],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99932486,0.000030595904,0.000108869885,0.00019304716,0.0001255574,0.00021707083],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004752751,0.00017862841,0.00024682345,0.00007984097,0.00035944683,0.00009693644,0.00013403024,0.00031155828,0.0002847568],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000072884077,0.0001777336,0.00011516581,0.000007949179,0.0006067939,0.00005047214,0.00006118256,0.00022811383,0.00007030266],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000025375264,0.0000012123544,0.0000055180685,0.0000055407218,0.000019497018,0.000003961062,0.0010075647,5.5864726e-9,3.113147e-7,0.42742598,0.0001982622,0.5713296],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000097851414,0.000027711134,0.00001062247,0.00006768977,0.000051999676,0.0000013561696,0.0000341739,1.3816737e-7,3.666674e-7,0.075526215,0.92398816,0.00019373966],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000789836,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002027411,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92378986,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000042774776,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010658136,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.72477657},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1599213758","doi":"10.18800/derechopucp.200001.018","title":"Le nouveau Code de Procédure civile francais, vingt-cinq ans apre' s","year":2000,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Derecho PUCP","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Patheon (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Art","score_opus":0.014121779348253833,"score_gpt":0.27350681370339475,"score_spread":0.25938503435514093,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1599213758","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.30068532,0.007908892,0.0008846804,0.037917454,0.0017566829,0.00060687325,0.000114405266,0.00028268385,0.64984304],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8660616,0.0029882605,0.00045337304,0.0016446998,0.0017451919,0.000046950765,0.000014880566,0.000046255038,0.12699877],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99753445,0.0002733756,0.00035831338,0.0004899965,0.00045837028,0.0008854667],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989852,0.000114382,0.0001126995,0.00033630093,0.00010517706,0.00034627187],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006270961,0.00026626707,0.00031261612,0.000064879525,0.0010364287,0.00019140016,0.00040522905,0.000504503,0.011682329],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000048402508,0.00031253838,0.00020086805,0.0005944588,0.0004344378,0.0004982087,0.000036834917,0.00046889414,0.0014108261],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000099215235,0.0010141444,0.010879532,0.00018830667,0.00016007334,0.00006612167,0.09796801,0.0002749518,0.0008579791,0.05444424,0.0766333,0.7574141],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005000677,0.000095294876,0.0054055345,0.00013439608,0.000057194156,0.000015008539,0.0017058175,0.00060961215,0.00052695035,0.0015778139,0.98900247,0.00036982502],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016355036,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.025328262,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9123692,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020763955,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007222566,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99993265},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1604660447","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1226","title":"Equal Autonomy in Canadian Federalism: The Continuing Search for Balance in the Interpretation of the Division of Powers","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Law; Federalism; Political science; Supreme court; Exclusive jurisdiction; Federal jurisdiction; Autonomy; Constitution; Jurisprudence; Writ; Separation of powers; Politics","score_opus":0.04632363708824638,"score_gpt":0.33090714569516394,"score_spread":0.28458350860691756,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1604660447","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5622852,0.056752622,0.0009851581,0.07344274,0.0015713928,0.013654357,0.000106131374,0.000038980786,0.29116344],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99767154,0.0015385075,0.000019787807,0.00067423773,0.000017226044,0.00003567381,0.0000018912758,0.0000036618865,0.000037462345],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99874955,0.00043896996,0.0002956359,0.00009587872,0.00021851077,0.00020147745],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99938333,0.00019243459,0.000109544104,0.00018348437,0.00010140959,0.000029780342],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034979845,0.000056759873,0.00016830611,0.000023323451,0.00013080284,0.000019296105,0.00040917014,0.000035752244,0.00006778231],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013664433,0.000030806485,0.00008770951,0.00022815987,0.00018771928,0.00010447627,0.000023351911,0.000105067,9.069307e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024429994,0.00005968738,0.03536439,0.00068687514,0.000018650991,8.8829876e-7,0.20658362,0.000010809169,0.000047986567,0.7091854,0.0004425815,0.04757465],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00046461396,0.00010259272,0.06374194,0.0074017625,0.00005454046,7.987232e-7,0.0060567283,0.00087659876,0.00012620188,0.0023111766,0.9186719,0.00019115921],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.47566026,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7449682,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9182293,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009441669,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002442015,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5278314},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1608848418","doi":"","title":"Goodyear and Nicastro: Observations from a Transnational and Comparative Perspective","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholar Commons (University of South Carolina)","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Supreme court; Law; Political science; Constitution; State (computer science); Perspective (graphical); European union; Club; International trade; Business","score_opus":0.0780719157132222,"score_gpt":0.2815661872234894,"score_spread":0.20349427151026722,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1608848418","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9869499,0.0003340958,0.0002709406,0.00464118,0.000049048514,0.00011236769,0.00014189047,0.000023743221,0.0074768034],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99794054,0.000024230683,0.0017871192,0.000017561202,0.00005153016,2.1250453e-7,0.000010887799,0.000002327738,0.00016556369],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993674,0.00014016684,0.000050668943,0.00012067199,0.000185811,0.00013525363],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994739,0.0000918479,0.00006093986,0.00007828441,0.00015358943,0.00014139804],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00028599452,0.00006107623,0.00013266168,0.00006718603,0.0008606001,0.000027942851,0.00009260182,0.00007020608,0.00006863598],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000023147764,0.00007914588,0.00004297105,0.00015570379,0.0003857827,0.00073923334,0.00004359454,0.00018600909,0.0000029939667],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036916383,0.000053048694,0.29849175,0.0000023700854,0.000061731655,7.084228e-7,0.28338024,0.0000016854901,0.00016922367,0.41756094,0.000054327378,0.00018706254],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00041386002,0.000023354623,0.80390996,0.000005945865,0.000057038895,4.3056085e-7,0.17173907,0.00003784302,0.000004110193,0.0007652996,0.022966325,0.0000767579],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002438004,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030428558,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.50541824,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000523683,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000057791563,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.66191274},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1628690444","doi":"","title":"Le Droit International Privé (1/2)","year":2008,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Law and economics; Economics","score_opus":0.012286257796185904,"score_gpt":0.2609161003219632,"score_spread":0.2486298425257773,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1628690444","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.49660265,0.046058543,0.013438525,0.1324279,0.012691971,0.00024820917,0.000011687588,0.00010502153,0.29841548],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8028257,0.07931649,0.000048512393,0.0002048429,0.0034284287,0.0000019152437,0.0000035843505,0.000016885473,0.11415367],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99655765,0.00015160923,0.00032851737,0.00019957095,0.0006060207,0.0021566297],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99929196,0.000039590897,0.00021651803,0.000107112784,0.00017557845,0.00016922626],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015941539,0.00014197748,0.00016478286,0.00010323253,0.0012275634,0.00007762213,0.00045748524,0.00016609524,0.0008068047],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000061134626,0.00016534378,0.00021734038,0.000264422,0.00041492048,0.0006397377,0.000041048446,0.0017893004,0.00033556359],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022808408,0.00014287118,0.0016485035,0.0000014199089,0.00016516329,0.000018566372,0.002421553,0.000013407676,0.00004352196,0.9228464,0.0007860341,0.07188977],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00055358006,0.00017057628,0.0011553688,0.000021979635,0.000025285908,0.001280795,0.0026438595,0.0000502038,0.000019898407,0.22551936,0.76838624,0.00017282975],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033029888,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011295882,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.76760024,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017525724,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00853152,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9970892},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1629672965","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511490330.004","title":"Family law and the construction of collective identity","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Identity (music); Collective identity; Law and economics; Sociology; Law; Business; Political science; Philosophy; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.021609939604858346,"score_gpt":0.22722807722772953,"score_spread":0.20561813762287118,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1629672965","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000657689,0.00017096695,0.00017716842,0.00005276714,0.00024602792,0.00040051586,0.00006531884,0.000037879345,0.99819165],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0084670065,0.0010614734,0.00002038858,0.000061611056,0.00012534234,4.316312e-7,0.000003624827,0.000009179636,0.99025095],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991629,0.00009910403,0.00012418411,0.00020320696,0.00028499032,0.00012561858],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992052,0.00011975511,0.000224523,0.00016271509,0.00022059458,0.00006725313],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002735799,0.00012734313,0.0002576739,0.00006732959,0.00070550386,0.00004960637,0.00020165661,0.00022528993,0.0000059225526],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000011017648,0.00012515746,0.00012298157,0.000014184123,0.0028167223,0.00014344932,0.00012148706,0.00020807878,0.0000011048522],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014403673,0.0000026658913,0.0000043909054,0.000011194449,0.00007742223,0.000009318652,0.0008887841,1.2592429e-7,0.0000047572094,0.9970352,0.0011250607,0.0006970418],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00076649315,0.000019719504,0.00005142134,0.00005075459,0.00019794346,0.0000034577151,0.0007966237,0.0000043751747,0.0000134363845,0.00092015724,0.9970459,0.00012973738],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015274863,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005698621,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.996115,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016341946,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016560858,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99989706},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1635410169","doi":"10.1163/ej.9789004158825.i-520","title":"State Succession to International Responsibility","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":51,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"State responsibility; State (computer science); International law; Doctrine; Political science; Independence (probability theory); Law; Ecological succession; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.027162323192087143,"score_gpt":0.3673587686274406,"score_spread":0.34019644543535343,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1635410169","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00069496303,0.00002002231,0.000740446,0.0030270193,0.0016193202,0.00025972453,0.000020591315,0.00011911096,0.9934988],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0016733204,0.000081730504,0.00024804697,0.00069340307,0.0008366394,0.0000033103224,0.000027574051,0.000011235747,0.99642473],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984936,0.0000617554,0.00023910876,0.0002848999,0.0007147607,0.00020583943],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999174,0.0001416472,0.0000832804,0.00017720622,0.00023706527,0.0001867811],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016095601,0.00010796795,0.00013213269,0.00019992446,0.00021902472,0.00009708596,0.00030060526,0.00020291889,0.0047458727],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000156063,0.00010112209,0.00007932899,0.00008466346,0.00009872219,0.00011109211,0.0000905387,0.00018369876,0.0004066361],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00037699394,0.00006624643,0.0004833444,0.0000121867515,0.000047228525,0.000025907131,0.011644426,0.0000034020322,0.00003703621,0.1613652,0.54470164,0.2812364],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000059482256,0.000021342741,0.0012374725,0.00003588501,0.000004156488,1.5853992e-7,0.0000784963,0.0000015593163,0.000010575185,0.008108898,0.99031585,0.00012611323],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002021985,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014564997,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.44561425,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005817927,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006631545,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9961639},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1649882548","doi":"10.7202/043716ar","title":"COLLECTIF, L'Internet et le droit : droit français, européen et comparé de l'internet, coll. « Légipresse », Victoires Éditions, Paris, 2001, 486 p., ISBN 2-908056-47-X.","year":2002,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; The Internet; Philosophy; Art; Computer science; Operating system","score_opus":0.015766213444368706,"score_gpt":0.25397122318146864,"score_spread":0.23820500973709993,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1649882548","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.38516855,0.036007162,0.025773635,0.07334627,0.0040835007,0.0021464394,0.00090657605,0.0011253963,0.47144246],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6648955,0.015202129,0.00079980056,0.0037803992,0.00067426515,0.00012104579,0.00012601176,0.00013980447,0.31426108],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99337995,0.0012935244,0.0011332759,0.0011590641,0.0010661039,0.0019680976],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965692,0.00082469214,0.0005946768,0.00073291047,0.00029668582,0.000981802],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001764868,0.00077476166,0.0010090572,0.0003865714,0.0012906587,0.00086245016,0.0011877546,0.0011588407,0.008302687],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00033535014,0.0010389272,0.0006320755,0.0012968539,0.0028151248,0.0009555812,0.00020369887,0.0018706119,0.0009872877],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012857601,0.0011392436,0.0051821135,0.00013783188,0.0004207604,0.0002556528,0.040586613,0.00031012564,0.00016782063,0.23019058,0.7124976,0.008983086],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019003066,0.00036804363,0.011245948,0.0004397059,0.00031706854,0.0001662796,0.0034517539,0.013665923,0.00052111247,0.012792392,0.95399004,0.0011414384],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08338207,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.036077164,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2797269,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024622628,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005108427,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998986},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1654395552","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1002","title":"Section 15 Jurisprudence in the Supreme Court of Canada in 2000","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Defence Research and Development Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Jurisprudence; Section (typography); Law; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.027678093894610904,"score_gpt":0.30503762935548795,"score_spread":0.27735953546087705,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1654395552","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19668765,0.15197389,0.000067085806,0.08688059,0.0022058908,0.0039143334,0.000037281603,0.00009664888,0.55813664],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9228071,0.07358963,0.000018480705,0.0023261448,0.00024432878,0.00004739214,0.0000058473843,0.000009968958,0.0009511061],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99767226,0.00047850452,0.0004999508,0.00022230182,0.00075403793,0.000372965],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999201,0.00015819511,0.00014360555,0.00029340998,0.00013170588,0.000072100745],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027229444,0.00012793945,0.00034217414,0.00004187154,0.00019673737,0.000029131626,0.00040687795,0.00007791004,0.0006951349],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015123622,0.00010393035,0.00007785098,0.00075424043,0.00013890926,0.00022397906,0.000025456584,0.00023605074,0.000007774563],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022162563,0.0014578223,0.14205791,0.005073271,0.0001415841,0.00048712664,0.04207202,0.00024911805,0.00049152505,0.3629446,0.3457219,0.09908151],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014741361,0.000023449615,0.009470686,0.0011236734,0.000019257097,0.000005882002,0.0002776349,0.000015296151,0.000008570723,0.00020663918,0.9885821,0.000119419514],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7909354,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98437035,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.72611946,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003549421,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00091605954,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.761124},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W173131517","doi":"","title":"Chronique de droit international privé canadien (2004-2010). Seconde partie: droit civil des provinces canadiennes de common law","year":2011,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Journal du droit international","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law","score_opus":0.019957660859166806,"score_gpt":0.2533819900469439,"score_spread":0.23342432918777709,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W173131517","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6713272,0.00094903697,0.0018602953,0.007346218,0.00923082,0.00027339178,0.00021130305,0.00007994845,0.30872184],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9452971,0.0015471132,0.0010233892,0.0011956934,0.005002543,0.00004050849,0.00004441145,0.00005465024,0.045794543],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960723,0.00029917,0.00094987574,0.0004687206,0.0009665548,0.0012433946],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970506,0.00016826301,0.0007426179,0.00023027296,0.000762843,0.001045391],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002189507,0.00037858804,0.00039638914,0.00031328833,0.0011073201,0.0005623219,0.0014833173,0.00038950302,0.009896077],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022608272,0.00045741047,0.00035162817,0.0002481453,0.0010952732,0.0017628785,0.00014691571,0.0009976266,0.00010914948],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018064637,0.00071747246,0.13041429,0.000058146103,0.0009815055,0.0009338817,0.04129585,0.00025232747,0.00016869989,0.7784346,0.017644525,0.028918104],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012119922,0.00039006097,0.07872509,0.0005370148,0.00016414297,0.003004697,0.0031389962,0.0048588607,0.0004061859,0.2775789,0.629196,0.0007880689],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.31784692,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8701229,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.61155146,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009930646,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002050136,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99978775},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1732253618","doi":"","title":"The Exclusion of Property Rights from the Charter: Correcting the Historical Record","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Property (philosophy); Property rights; Law and economics; Political science; Law; Business; Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.01169331621321475,"score_gpt":0.24659498303242947,"score_spread":0.2349016668192147,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1732253618","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.838943,0.0056233304,0.0066116345,0.11290783,0.006490187,0.0005882673,0.000001245645,0.00007428464,0.028760219],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9892506,0.0018822869,0.0000071824966,0.00011119649,0.0020563412,0.0000025379716,3.0466794e-7,0.00000657653,0.006682954],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977556,0.0006262978,0.0002466916,0.00010835295,0.00042969044,0.00083335704],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998795,0.00061802997,0.00025388724,0.00018179613,0.000108518536,0.000042768093],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005312137,0.000077610624,0.00010670738,0.000013075646,0.0038215073,0.00009361938,0.0005304299,0.00005580176,0.00003515674],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00024057028,0.000027052769,0.00011475231,0.00013050987,0.00014079566,0.00009629204,0.00003978461,0.0010649462,0.000008726404],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000072613606,0.00003536793,0.0018200552,5.328201e-7,0.000058497484,2.3690393e-7,0.012197318,0.0000016057696,0.00013001332,0.069825284,0.0032795498,0.91257894],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014903514,0.00014147961,0.00066410913,0.000014061001,0.000024734489,0.000013319929,0.0031127483,0.00014153204,0.000020834128,0.08556019,0.91010016,0.000057777797],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023355056,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.078963086,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9125211,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009072172,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005949427,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9974754},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1747985514","doi":"10.1515/9780748699544-014","title":"8. Does Intellectual Property Have Personality?","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Edinburgh University Press eBooks","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Intellectual property; Personality; Focus (optics); Law; Property (philosophy); Affect (linguistics); Law and economics; Political science; Psychology; Sociology; Social psychology; Communication; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03767372808145148,"score_gpt":0.24510166474870695,"score_spread":0.20742793666725548,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1747985514","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00004446294,0.000053372176,0.000043178487,0.0005546974,0.00077097234,0.00045506464,0.000044449444,0.00022185284,0.997812],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0016106247,0.00048080223,0.000032929634,0.000115387964,0.0015673,5.2844956e-7,0.000013629044,0.00002014119,0.99615866],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99821144,0.000064725195,0.00017882643,0.00050992734,0.0006617462,0.00037335756],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99889916,0.00013922062,0.0001737414,0.00029372546,0.0002431132,0.00025103113],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00033064344,0.0003087855,0.00035521638,0.00015670528,0.0008908374,0.000114480456,0.00052615063,0.00057894504,0.0020806717],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000047140962,0.0002171407,0.00028577272,0.0000100728375,0.000648539,0.00015945427,0.00015986775,0.0005612486,0.000009293984],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00036600928,0.000060142702,0.000012099184,0.00003043557,0.0003316436,0.00025449847,0.079939045,0.0000014338,0.000017616243,0.5712531,0.19239971,0.15533422],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023562313,0.00007022751,0.0000028750471,0.00011471235,0.0001335623,0.000001066494,0.0011353203,0.0000100308725,0.000017271339,0.0011401548,0.99674183,0.00039734135],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0057205954,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014157956,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8043421,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003787147,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00031065088,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99883157},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1751178648","doi":"","title":"Earned Citizenship: Property Lessons for Immigration Reform","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Citizenship; Law; Entitlement (fair division); Polity; Political science; Law and economics; Property (philosophy); Property rights; Politics; Sociology; Economics","score_opus":0.1263720727743552,"score_gpt":0.3388844784916508,"score_spread":0.21251240571729563,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1751178648","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02705865,0.000013468852,0.0025027087,0.009392535,0.00024902786,0.00041093014,0.0000032608034,0.00015811586,0.9602113],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9445203,0.000036257712,0.00097227487,0.00016272528,0.00017572998,0.000045521563,0.0000042785045,0.000005353963,0.05407755],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994809,0.000025826555,0.00009741972,0.00011203549,0.00011948041,0.00016434911],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99971443,0.0000148961935,0.000034889206,0.00008098399,0.00009616286,0.00005861568],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00039161652,0.00004517728,0.000059275444,0.000026535365,0.00040644192,0.0000319133,0.00008048682,0.000063268475,0.000527149],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000036157304,0.000028212573,0.00004936874,0.00007919027,0.000060749444,0.000117218784,0.000009056171,0.000032881006,0.000031828873],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000062852676,0.000044608627,0.00041595678,0.0000064807996,0.000016252694,4.092725e-7,0.030773873,3.8233022e-8,0.0007258265,0.89237016,0.0046536624,0.0709299],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00051978085,0.00023545272,0.01354292,0.000014674667,0.000028502736,6.1477834e-7,0.017804855,0.00013113643,0.00455029,0.022160962,0.940749,0.00026184518],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014268604,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016513059,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9360953,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000068368456,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000061808736,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99229544},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W176148233","doi":"","title":"Security over receivables : an international handbook","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Political science; Debt; Economy; Law; Public administration; Geography; Business; Finance; Economics","score_opus":0.04720736020091146,"score_gpt":0.37632341388608337,"score_spread":0.32911605368517194,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W176148233","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.45908728,0.000094153365,0.0000012256414,0.0006045772,0.0011307613,0.0004044453,0.000047099613,0.000058446716,0.538572],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.83436036,0.1541749,0.00020132288,0.00011732694,0.001981107,0.00013174726,0.000119732395,0.00004392116,0.008869604],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972959,0.0004578267,0.000415574,0.0007091081,0.0005229849,0.0005986134],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985938,0.00024834208,0.00014493265,0.00057370076,0.00018654851,0.000252651],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002172318,0.0001846194,0.00029510306,0.00037507192,0.00051092694,0.00030200946,0.00092404365,0.00051741826,0.00075010874],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00029747302,0.00022047722,0.0001399844,0.000089525114,0.0006183062,0.0003451932,0.0006072948,0.0012624208,0.000014437859],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00040885582,0.0009697391,0.065521635,0.00009701187,0.00028507298,0.00013999519,0.06839356,0.003019007,0.00009315695,0.014090828,0.0019552517,0.8450259],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035647687,0.00004642479,0.008931936,0.00013203498,0.0000035996686,0.000002564021,0.0016467922,0.0025327578,0.0000285261,0.00511523,0.9808858,0.0003178467],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0052678934,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015281316,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97893053,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013423436,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011043686,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.89908},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1764567595","doi":"10.3968/j.ccc.1923670020110703.280","title":"The Improvement of Civil Pretrial Procedures in China: the Comparison of Pretrial Procedures in China, Japan and South Korea","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cross-cultural communication","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tribunal; Burden of proof; China; Political science; Civil procedure; Humanities; Law; Legislation; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03422002991347494,"score_gpt":0.34751741511919065,"score_spread":0.3132973852057157,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1764567595","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9914656,0.0010761565,9.589412e-7,0.00060250325,0.00010655238,0.0009562616,0.0000070351452,0.000017239101,0.005767672],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99912816,0.0006055661,0.000025219922,0.0000082886545,0.00006677416,0.00006513443,0.000009471566,0.0000059519616,0.00008543448],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99851346,0.00024215232,0.00057017716,0.00015631806,0.00030915145,0.00020871387],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987783,0.00014790712,0.00048384204,0.0003769229,0.0001787095,0.00003436004],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001424324,0.0001175148,0.00022126808,0.000047462654,0.00073171145,0.00015606881,0.00065784075,0.000115339324,0.000017045657],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010221981,0.00006861824,0.00006040306,0.0003419855,0.0012469991,0.00035449202,0.00017460075,0.00026288888,3.9163353e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009877289,0.0003045973,0.39084914,0.00009414817,0.000033239605,5.7563543e-8,0.57951075,0.00002965202,0.0024732915,0.011525422,0.00013830136,0.0140536865],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012880865,0.00023890633,0.9728509,0.00014077885,0.000019453102,3.0559877e-7,0.020067323,0.00020198176,0.00229125,0.001570248,0.0012028421,0.00012792768],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011047102,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07948661,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.58200175,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006677935,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001422228,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9955384},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W177438353","doi":"","title":"The Role of International Treaties in the Interpretation of Canadian Intellectual Property Statutes","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statute; Intellectual property; Law; Scope (computer science); Political science; International law; Supreme court; Interpretation (philosophy); Settlement (finance); Statute of limitations; Economics","score_opus":0.005704566361314508,"score_gpt":0.23442236867763405,"score_spread":0.22871780231631955,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W177438353","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8103797,0.0043122983,0.00029881726,0.008321363,0.00030321654,0.00026758845,0.00000623555,0.000008192418,0.17610258],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9956358,0.0030269483,0.000005819701,0.000014845709,0.0001285895,0.0000033456931,0.0000019731103,0.0000030134681,0.0011796745],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988105,0.00016652324,0.00022136778,0.000049646755,0.00026143354,0.0004905142],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995157,0.0001794578,0.000116615454,0.000050809565,0.000119263445,0.000018125522],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017687455,0.000045455963,0.000063481195,0.00018744983,0.00027095873,0.000052735486,0.00029225633,0.00003069128,0.000025770103],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016001685,0.00002312337,0.00004849456,0.0002619041,0.00015279053,0.0001253606,0.000006724938,0.00034463033,0.0000010597911],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001054661,0.000055329383,0.013098428,0.0000011611145,0.000053103835,4.6313244e-7,0.052867673,0.00010416604,0.00018470333,0.71002495,0.00025508675,0.22324947],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004128212,0.00039133086,0.0073774396,0.0000398288,0.000025779374,0.00002272802,0.21253274,0.0012031365,0.00031073816,0.27255937,0.5050004,0.00012367229],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.43067092,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.94832945,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.51765853,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00041000883,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019906308,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5731203},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W178271059","doi":"","title":"Constitutional Jurisdiction Over Paracopyright Laws","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionality; Legislation; Law; Political science; Constitution; Doctrine; Context (archaeology); Argument (complex analysis); Legislature; Jurisdiction; Law and economics; Economics","score_opus":0.009051211902454236,"score_gpt":0.28952134262939605,"score_spread":0.2804701307269418,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W178271059","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.42964074,0.008908125,0.033250447,0.033419143,0.002917775,0.0005074905,0.0000112567195,0.0003937373,0.49095127],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.984353,0.004723471,0.000079945494,0.00027428457,0.0032010565,0.000004004234,0.000003276535,0.000006007849,0.0073549636],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974636,0.0001214334,0.00024435532,0.0001529292,0.0005045325,0.0015131686],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995045,0.00004018296,0.0001309876,0.00008290556,0.000106550644,0.00013484876],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019979218,0.000104494626,0.00011349011,0.00006755069,0.0012820682,0.00011367241,0.00017315544,0.00011411085,0.00087510684],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003906969,0.00009773587,0.0001211884,0.00017533283,0.00038595876,0.00058712804,0.000012888749,0.0010107077,0.00017523667],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002045311,0.000052369705,0.0014163178,4.7088002e-7,0.0000426739,0.0000011919781,0.0007168312,0.000037237554,0.000056371,0.9510057,0.0008181511,0.04583225],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00045578834,0.00006434155,0.001440863,0.0000077884115,0.000025465579,0.00007960641,0.00067202013,0.000043673717,0.00002406182,0.061696608,0.93535817,0.00013161589],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004153091,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009709245,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93454003,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015342785,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002686389,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9860762},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1792641851","doi":"","title":"Charting Developments Concerning Punitive Damages: Is the Tide Changing?","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Working Paper Series","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Punitive damages; Damages; Political science; Law; Supreme court","score_opus":0.025414448180818647,"score_gpt":0.269588514230996,"score_spread":0.24417406605017736,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1792641851","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.45190412,0.00067803054,0.000106707186,0.0149726095,0.00093476736,0.00028569996,0.000003289361,0.00029438475,0.53082037],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97636855,0.00007539413,0.00018482927,0.0011081757,0.0007165694,0.000021437143,0.0000053573244,0.000012617716,0.02150707],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99894243,0.00008806743,0.0001617111,0.00016031845,0.00027428716,0.00037316373],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996088,0.00009725151,0.0001044495,0.00010044797,0.000056190565,0.00003286303],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005495583,0.000100316305,0.00009764792,0.000047448513,0.0020070265,0.00022444132,0.00016387715,0.00005446597,0.00024859665],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000045389745,0.00008186643,0.000042900676,0.00034258273,0.00021907566,0.0002717804,0.00006233507,0.00012063794,0.000034528333],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000043082666,0.000040036728,0.12802552,0.000016417343,0.00009018249,0.000023653509,0.58670944,0.000019565345,0.0017336622,0.16264655,0.0055293175,0.115122594],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007914665,0.0000073078827,0.02443095,0.00008522272,0.000009334006,0.0000010751046,0.023463806,0.0000035819724,0.00041133753,0.0004640657,0.95091945,0.00012473458],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021445698,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0043138303,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9453901,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000059323338,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007409769,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99929225},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1797560180","doi":"10.1002/iir.1217","title":"The Extra‐Territoriality of the Statutory Stay in an English Administration","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Insolvency Review","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Territoriality; Statutory law; Administration (probate law); Scope (computer science); Law; Political science; Law and economics; Connection (principal bundle); Business; Sociology; Computer science; Engineering","score_opus":0.03109945387347425,"score_gpt":0.367075164411868,"score_spread":0.33597571053839376,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1797560180","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5842564,0.033142783,0.00037303235,0.039459366,0.045725904,0.0028730237,0.00009296621,0.00015577872,0.29392076],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.985506,0.012677549,0.000021997626,0.0002862688,0.0011150123,0.0000269761,0.000006383597,0.0000037714246,0.00035602713],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99851936,0.0004549821,0.0003568534,0.00011377918,0.00045340892,0.000101644175],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991392,0.00015489246,0.00019535267,0.00019695704,0.00028027195,0.000033342283],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020675468,0.00005560584,0.00010111481,0.00001580969,0.00017723025,0.000055252473,0.00046423567,0.000033998032,0.0000951356],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007138711,0.000035846053,0.00007572795,0.00011761214,0.00014122842,0.00024506083,0.000026451224,0.00010946325,0.0000024298238],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000040056348,0.000310306,0.04303676,0.00018943053,0.00003060796,7.117108e-7,0.010197242,0.000004151535,0.00010352977,0.74107194,0.0034591318,0.20155615],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000728179,0.00002834679,0.032038737,0.0003315628,0.000006841986,1.2912919e-7,0.0001064445,0.000022836844,0.000017109769,0.001474822,0.9658565,0.00004388721],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007408259,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008055327,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96239734,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008205235,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016736404,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.44950616},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1813004059","doi":"","title":"Judgment in S D Myers, Inc v Canada","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"TDM","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Business","score_opus":0.011114129556833345,"score_gpt":0.26189392930596467,"score_spread":0.25077979974913134,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1813004059","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8782979,0.00008290732,0.000020868181,0.012201517,0.00038891952,0.00009066401,0.0000015061029,0.000022645596,0.108893044],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99855834,0.000032433923,0.0000348046,0.00041380114,0.00009664423,0.0000027886495,8.829667e-7,0.0000017190017,0.0008585563],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99958503,0.000014112367,0.000058324593,0.00005814449,0.00016241147,0.00012196914],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998795,0.000008696787,0.00001320031,0.000043352724,0.000010855844,0.00004440099],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001303469,0.000025293282,0.000037578655,0.000015994972,0.00009824621,0.000012049534,0.000054620057,0.000020787149,0.000138785],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000120640225,0.000026018242,0.000007703235,0.00009120326,0.00002311851,0.00003899945,0.000008380981,0.00003969215,0.000010175019],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005985167,0.00039264868,0.083466426,0.000028362549,0.00004165655,0.00027633653,0.13081671,0.0019478318,0.0011801596,0.59430915,0.030944223,0.15653662],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022778501,0.000009840264,0.028557437,0.000008482093,0.0000014435279,1.756568e-7,0.0014785673,0.0000022004574,0.00011452431,0.0010267855,0.9685158,0.000056975307],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98457795,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99569243,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9375716,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00036369887,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00055170077,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15195985},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1836138028","doi":"","title":"'There are Parts of the World were Things are Badly Wrong':Forum Selection Clauses and Unfair Jurisdictions","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Selection (genetic algorithm); Law; Law and economics; Business; Political science; Computer science; Economics; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.014564627366096072,"score_gpt":0.28523456691375476,"score_spread":0.27066993954765867,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1836138028","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6345607,0.00053379766,0.0008819583,0.030946251,0.0013873957,0.00063788047,0.000010486342,0.00036801907,0.3306735],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.975573,0.00010666006,0.00007571478,0.0005063057,0.00021833135,0.0000051866996,7.415638e-7,0.000010280839,0.023503779],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99882483,0.00008256912,0.0002435501,0.00019771565,0.00034842748,0.00030287396],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992676,0.00012849532,0.00022411543,0.00014197032,0.0001386084,0.0000992614],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00061711774,0.000108829634,0.00014517624,0.00009478182,0.0010720284,0.000070597445,0.00013820712,0.00011204256,0.00043630291],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000053577958,0.00008039867,0.00008542685,0.0005288691,0.00026510714,0.00035367833,0.000049345217,0.00019474624,0.0000067911456],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004281142,0.0001379107,0.87685245,0.00002620472,0.000057701465,0.000001962566,0.009749441,0.00002004874,0.00027150067,0.07947305,0.024139052,0.009227842],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015260949,0.0000266271,0.3404976,0.00006639029,0.000028859975,0.000001898941,0.012015282,0.000024518367,0.0007759001,0.0008612549,0.6454354,0.00011368374],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034522372,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1823185,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6212963,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000076107564,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006738394,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8326021},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1841300529","doi":"","title":"Judicial 'Copying' Does Not Affect Independence or Impartiality: Supreme Court of Canada","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Impartiality; Supreme court; Copying; Law; Political science; Affect (linguistics); Independence (probability theory); Judicial independence; Sociology","score_opus":0.013523042894234632,"score_gpt":0.281805691809006,"score_spread":0.2682826489147714,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1841300529","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9868603,0.00020232995,0.00047451336,0.00766476,0.00086267217,0.00027735965,0.0000066842695,0.000023144827,0.0036282786],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9950803,0.0009225132,0.000014112397,0.000165952,0.00081397593,0.0000072852517,8.2184386e-7,0.000010860252,0.0029841932],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965234,0.0002228873,0.00034305803,0.00016213792,0.00093426823,0.0018142723],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990355,0.00012964722,0.0002576177,0.00012254651,0.00027226607,0.00018246936],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027807148,0.00012227979,0.0002295436,0.00006145148,0.0006662139,0.000094386734,0.00034127344,0.000107162785,0.00076645525],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002520988,0.00008654566,0.00008751017,0.00019241203,0.00013393347,0.00035765147,0.00003081878,0.0009407278,0.000007630456],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0016087199,0.0006442905,0.11184581,0.00009634415,0.0015684766,0.00006612276,0.025522828,0.00011877697,0.03185561,0.5889789,0.016498353,0.22119577],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0075499527,0.0042918813,0.08978877,0.0004548227,0.0006577284,0.0005450143,0.14428413,0.00080911414,0.028366435,0.47057804,0.24943553,0.003238579],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8459576,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98409915,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23293719,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013047059,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017906174,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98766136},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1841878223","doi":"","title":"Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments in Canada","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Enforcement; Corporation; Chevron (anatomy); State (computer science); Law; Political science; Obstacle; Law and economics; Business; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.014483324662284743,"score_gpt":0.23996572142701733,"score_spread":0.22548239676473258,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1841878223","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9680086,0.00020153607,0.00038432973,0.00031750696,0.00008918834,0.00007588003,0.0000013702894,0.000002341737,0.030919252],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997819,0.0018887601,0.000009686532,0.000047541715,0.00008007431,0.0000013924197,0.0000016900542,0.0000025180213,0.00014932065],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989601,0.000068364236,0.00014512784,0.000054336815,0.00020233073,0.0005697848],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997862,0.000025410016,0.00008371461,0.000027318814,0.000035003162,0.00004236897],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001307358,0.00003663134,0.00006992258,0.000042049167,0.00011131272,0.000011186785,0.000052115807,0.000020679896,0.00007697749],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000033056232,0.00003555487,0.000014488211,0.00006647388,0.000021877091,0.000084042396,0.0000066976513,0.00023837647,6.923191e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004993237,0.00003135648,0.045871038,0.000007577062,0.000042463445,8.310616e-7,0.0019791706,0.000018276216,0.000076443066,0.39124477,0.0000672767,0.5606109],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001704463,0.00044753868,0.009435189,0.00007365579,0.000031327243,0.000021885784,0.03205059,0.00029883388,0.00022190931,0.913737,0.041748952,0.00022868087],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9117153,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99268436,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5603822,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010687344,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026435987,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4689631},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W185269366","doi":"","title":"Mediation in the Modern Millennium","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Institutional Knowledge (InK) - Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University (Singapore Management University)","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mediation; Context (archaeology); Alternative dispute resolution; Law; Political science; Conciliation; Family mediation; Transformative mediation; Sociology; History","score_opus":0.03048776896849187,"score_gpt":0.23931673461293929,"score_spread":0.20882896564444742,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W185269366","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018655494,0.0009772887,0.0067375624,0.0025817913,0.0016842147,0.0015280402,0.00005661078,0.00037432535,0.96740466],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8378021,0.003914055,0.00083185546,0.00022074662,0.0005661448,0.0000067768933,0.00028734538,0.000029826504,0.15634112],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9952187,0.00071060896,0.0005456609,0.0011950334,0.0012938434,0.0010361809],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998073,0.00020312765,0.00030961394,0.0006659847,0.00041055988,0.00033771782],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013616619,0.0006089199,0.00045079528,0.0022672464,0.006111281,0.00021455178,0.0018285473,0.00035449932,0.0006889107],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005322972,0.0006815934,0.00040880678,0.0036315778,0.0019976995,0.0016907139,0.0010646534,0.0005942414,0.00085234595],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001693467,0.0014751303,0.0013460179,0.0001910429,0.0003023192,0.0015583215,0.010933867,0.0010750445,0.000008910111,0.94420254,0.014106164,0.024631271],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0027666863,0.000057808582,0.0056398576,0.0002651707,0.00032280176,0.000016720094,0.006259993,0.003306382,0.0000038152857,0.0013420151,0.97925675,0.0007620083],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00038271263,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006809017,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9651506,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005068661,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002799782,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999256},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W188080818","doi":"","title":"Judicial Globalization: New Development or Old Wine in New Bottles?","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alexandria (UniSG) (University of St.Gallen)","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Globalization; Law; Human rights; Political science; Conversation; Criminal law; Democracy; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.03379422245828086,"score_gpt":0.2585722732258251,"score_spread":0.22477805076754423,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W188080818","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.50554067,0.0008405151,0.020137992,0.021203352,0.0018578606,0.0012924355,0.000026668667,0.00031394057,0.4487866],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7856209,0.0018743594,0.014548422,0.00042706114,0.0007039685,5.85313e-7,0.00005376143,0.000031938376,0.19673896],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99852914,0.00012012344,0.00019663705,0.00030721046,0.00049869023,0.0003481942],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99921477,0.00005543979,0.00015966443,0.00017736033,0.000105499275,0.0002872785],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00039116858,0.00014716845,0.00027366207,0.0001862766,0.0005415888,0.00003457315,0.0003330218,0.00018498437,0.005985792],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007074211,0.00018114336,0.00007668758,0.000782577,0.00016256676,0.0005402736,0.00006663149,0.0001166609,0.0000622298],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008065689,0.00068483513,0.024938708,0.000064616645,0.00029082384,0.00019778173,0.13138393,0.00013213516,0.0002469308,0.61638933,0.14009425,0.08477008],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001971299,0.000079904894,0.030699061,0.00006965097,0.0000320711,0.0000023748953,0.008921804,0.000020893458,0.00001763661,0.0011930711,0.95674545,0.000246807],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014862852,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.091399714,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.81665117,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023171715,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018486565,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9949229},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W189092474","doi":"","title":"The Canadian Legal Perspective on Challenging Enforcement of the $18.2 Billion Ecuadorian Judgment against Chevron - Part II: Foreign Judgment Enforcement Standards in Common Law Canada","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"TDM","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Chevron (anatomy); Perspective (graphical); Enforcement; Law enforcement; Law; Political science; Business; Computer science; Geology","score_opus":0.023351939156314262,"score_gpt":0.29231102144529447,"score_spread":0.2689590822889802,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W189092474","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18314302,0.00035987596,0.0000025086063,0.0070626605,0.0014638947,0.0010216784,0.000074996075,0.000017544435,0.80685383],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979414,0.00020265867,0.000001993076,0.00068988506,0.00032156683,0.000057912046,0.000007770976,0.000011704519,0.00076511933],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974177,0.00016259505,0.00033788418,0.00017796668,0.0011926452,0.0007112105],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99910516,0.00006108389,0.00015410139,0.00030399955,0.00012492288,0.00025071035],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017759237,0.00016411452,0.00018077814,0.00006164865,0.0022110476,0.00006538423,0.0002952876,0.00007591847,0.0002434874],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000027464721,0.00011162842,0.00007904801,0.00020286128,0.0001845057,0.00013626812,0.00007192857,0.0002254631,0.0000012766285],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003245966,0.00005162481,0.0006273383,0.0000053168383,0.000034067547,0.0000016093843,0.015089024,0.0005884879,0.0000074138793,0.97845906,0.0020622443,0.0030413477],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00040734452,0.00012226435,0.0015267124,0.00009052214,0.000016633618,2.2576279e-7,0.029917637,0.00010904859,0.00070803607,0.00056603586,0.9663683,0.00016724512],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99457306,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99943286,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97789305,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008852745,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014661378,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990879},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1895924768","doi":"","title":"Canadian Conflict of Laws, 5th Edition","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Conflict of laws; Political science","score_opus":0.030837562297541497,"score_gpt":0.2798800881174427,"score_spread":0.2490425258199012,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1895924768","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.102441914,0.00060736394,0.000034504657,0.0070227035,0.0012257452,0.00031208483,0.000071747934,0.00012417255,0.88815975],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9870407,0.00027861234,0.00007628417,0.00091419177,0.0009024716,0.000010703429,0.000012225886,0.000011328069,0.010753492],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987837,0.000095464995,0.0002140352,0.00018307414,0.0003557604,0.00036794555],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99908096,0.000046297093,0.00008481471,0.00019998163,0.00012949342,0.00045842875],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00037137698,0.000095240495,0.00015238966,0.00007757654,0.0005271903,0.000076721044,0.00019672155,0.00014247447,0.0076847933],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008110329,0.00010371557,0.00007943001,0.00023501566,0.00020088164,0.00029528158,0.000013936238,0.00015271487,0.00045592748],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010860228,0.00012203434,0.009157257,0.000025294465,0.000052343676,0.000023228044,0.008879693,0.000012991004,0.0005254505,0.8657194,0.10227026,0.013201191],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020969864,0.00003931622,0.0027035642,0.000022305203,0.0000126773575,0.0000010183504,0.0003957026,0.000039291015,0.00021477148,0.0006038408,0.99563247,0.00012535558],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.74183017,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8549801,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8933622,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021041872,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014421139,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9932223},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1914959741","doi":"","title":"Non-State Law in the (Proposed) Hague Principles on Choice of Law in International Contracts","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Choice of law; Conflict of laws; Arbitration; Law; International law; Political science; State (computer science); Private law; Municipal law; Comparative law; Commercial law; Law and economics; Economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.035032304122161274,"score_gpt":0.3051253577801458,"score_spread":0.2700930536579845,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1914959741","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7710391,0.00014737724,0.000047288642,0.0017696088,0.0002661113,0.00017494732,0.0000015527274,0.000007341774,0.22654666],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99823284,0.00083475275,0.000011968812,0.0002867393,0.00018885492,0.0000032672522,8.564589e-7,0.0000061069604,0.00043459964],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982856,0.00014900668,0.00028877181,0.000109422195,0.00038892822,0.00077826326],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995418,0.00009460426,0.00017219875,0.00008595731,0.00006908038,0.000036314905],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029072794,0.000077484205,0.00011512079,0.000082307095,0.00017260034,0.000043482083,0.00040392592,0.000055757897,0.000048493417],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005395549,0.000058136306,0.000058041525,0.00012514986,0.00015027911,0.00024570953,0.000015725615,0.0009187673,0.0000075188836],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007471339,0.00016638705,0.005411304,0.0000010948359,0.000021052585,0.0000056349077,0.01448014,0.000016109954,0.00008651134,0.97610337,0.0000037964091,0.0036299005],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0043306197,0.001288344,0.22578067,0.0002363205,0.00003427329,0.000058438047,0.01944367,0.00019973402,0.00145695,0.49790674,0.24877277,0.00049145526],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.033386245,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4359808,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4781966,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00041268574,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005904525,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97305053},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1920220463","doi":"","title":"Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments and Arbitral Awards in Canada","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Enforcement; Business; Law and economics; Law; Political science; Economics","score_opus":0.02295291339054728,"score_gpt":0.23828100028745938,"score_spread":0.2153280868969121,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1920220463","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98182684,0.0010559,0.000036844212,0.00039042666,0.00005682896,0.000078965364,0.000002801503,0.0000021667756,0.016549222],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98942405,0.010249062,0.000009059827,0.00004671869,0.00006080736,0.0000015123458,0.0000010095093,0.0000027732947,0.0002050182],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99894315,0.00004445989,0.00015060075,0.00006654475,0.00020372657,0.0005915476],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99980295,0.00001643114,0.00007277684,0.000023656276,0.000028114731,0.000056097517],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006462012,0.00004572931,0.000079296224,0.0000478027,0.0001323574,0.000016667182,0.000038960727,0.000025503075,0.00014749882],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000016348946,0.000044789005,0.000014120667,0.00007045121,0.000035883982,0.00011571634,0.0000075000025,0.00028658885,4.0098897e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007612585,0.000092712056,0.13843077,0.000020841324,0.00012999601,0.000009131767,0.008048914,0.000011304145,0.00014421393,0.17426875,0.00022401752,0.6785432],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006168332,0.001457716,0.041664492,0.00023820292,0.00013755358,0.00023600571,0.108088575,0.0014207968,0.00044708847,0.7979193,0.041413598,0.0008083435],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.81122017,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97536474,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.67773485,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00086066127,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010914732,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22505993},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1921771691","doi":"","title":"Recent Private International Law Developments Before the Supreme Court of Canada","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Political science; Conflict of laws; Jurisdiction; Appeal; Charter; Enforcement; Original jurisdiction; Context (archaeology); Statutory law; Doctrine; Choice of law; History","score_opus":0.009249835389792817,"score_gpt":0.260097049987172,"score_spread":0.2508472145973792,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1921771691","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.68549114,0.0013572087,0.000512412,0.15722065,0.0020910918,0.0003140301,0.000007367336,0.000028963412,0.15297717],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9938135,0.0030868046,0.000025312484,0.0004841985,0.0003036551,7.7461374e-7,0.0000023415978,0.0000034846944,0.00227991],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99827117,0.000059866503,0.00020249822,0.0000733049,0.0005726176,0.0008205595],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99956584,0.000013661582,0.00013845236,0.000061379455,0.0001632388,0.00005740012],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014249614,0.00006069672,0.00007475254,0.000022938077,0.00053038454,0.000039946877,0.00034926223,0.000032739343,0.000086691085],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000044856883,0.00004458406,0.000034598324,0.000106122585,0.000057500907,0.00011890959,0.000014165511,0.0004659414,0.0000011624364],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019270552,0.00002577472,0.0022310645,3.2425217e-7,0.0000695578,0.0000012093867,0.0017702556,0.0000070429433,0.000037833895,0.891719,0.000468557,0.103650145],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023777064,0.00007571395,0.010063663,0.000011074813,0.000009523151,0.000020654837,0.002363498,0.0000088923025,0.00006766096,0.1164866,0.8705908,0.000064118176],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.068918265,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.91806275,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87012225,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014878431,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0049695643,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9372819},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1928814171","doi":"","title":"Oxford LibGuides: Canadian law: Canadian law","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"libguides","venue":"","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.038787975351773585,"score_gpt":0.2811137213560216,"score_spread":0.242325746004248,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1928814171","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00004963017,0.00057349,0.0000022902036,0.006968729,0.004312043,0.00049234554,0.0004033907,0.00020882116,0.98698926],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.09125169,0.0029804592,0.00032628982,0.03567499,0.006432947,0.00007293536,0.00060946913,0.0001609916,0.86249024],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99680996,0.00014524334,0.0004654615,0.000558377,0.0005279628,0.0014930087],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963753,0.00007083962,0.0001396837,0.00052240887,0.0002949201,0.0025967993],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00075146504,0.00039145828,0.0004525303,0.0004431001,0.0022966024,0.00046225887,0.00093537144,0.0011966681,0.018553045],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000070733164,0.00040415995,0.00024024503,0.00031152988,0.00063203956,0.0003678543,0.00004204859,0.0005585559,0.00058410014],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000010766489,0.000004474013,0.00006875546,0.000009453695,0.000032291453,0.000032499705,0.002670128,8.451996e-8,8.516995e-8,0.6260122,0.36908025,0.002088696],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000084536114,0.000033016306,0.000083936706,0.00007155898,0.00005177241,0.0000022982247,0.0009927289,0.0000012008202,0.0000035525688,0.004701891,0.9934427,0.00053079455],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9999872,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999987,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.62436247,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014590347,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008998534,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99984103},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1940146181","doi":"10.3968/4276","title":"Consideration of \"Creation\" in Legal Finding: From the Formulation of Limitations of Law and the Judge's Own Initiative","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Studies in sociology of science","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Law; Discretion; Jurisdiction; Statute; Philosophy of law; Teleology; Political science; Sociology; Comparative law","score_opus":0.1620521966182047,"score_gpt":0.40171377453890134,"score_spread":0.23966157792069664,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1940146181","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9836465,0.00028447277,0.00008814712,0.0032841978,0.00010290992,0.00016527581,0.000004611102,0.0000017795365,0.0124220755],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993353,0.00036185025,0.00017179594,0.000097163465,0.00001936893,0.000007624439,8.063203e-7,7.856508e-7,0.0000053206354],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990835,0.00028411773,0.00028999324,0.0000914245,0.00017096147,0.0000799858],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99523735,0.004123643,0.00029208572,0.00006851232,0.00027141,0.000007006792],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026059216,0.000036066456,0.00017891436,0.00005020371,0.00034120356,0.0000028495638,0.00011205845,0.000038382106,0.0000022961929],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029959353,0.00002293842,0.0000210999,0.00021484647,0.035026964,0.00019070986,0.00004699488,0.000058019916,6.998725e-8],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013947226,0.000010325125,0.012734705,0.0000026930059,0.0000075635053,1.3191952e-8,0.3706776,0.00005544901,0.00032297708,0.61580765,0.0000062071895,0.00036090962],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011793327,0.00014338532,0.37620395,0.000081899576,0.00002815071,1.3368434e-7,0.39842275,0.000817356,0.0016315514,0.22092159,0.0005040926,0.00006579234],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028623636,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007961291,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.39488605,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000026543603,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009690266,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96759915},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1943307676","doi":"","title":"Conflict of laws in international tort cases: The need for reform on both sides of the Tasman","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Yearbook of New Zealand jurisprudence","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tort; Jurisdiction; Law; Test (biology); Flexibility (engineering); Jurisprudence; Political science; Choice of law; Common law; High Court; Conflict of laws; Law and economics; Sociology; Economics; Liability; Management","score_opus":0.03126889659248875,"score_gpt":0.32029698873439144,"score_spread":0.28902809214190267,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1943307676","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93706536,0.0000974039,0.000012562947,0.0043832418,0.00032085614,0.0004893582,0.000031631735,0.00001090988,0.057588656],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9910491,0.00006461345,0.000049728522,0.00007707569,0.00023607959,0.000008733569,0.0000021043847,0.000005621304,0.008506951],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99902016,0.00004106842,0.00030964756,0.00011138656,0.00038209968,0.00013562122],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99926513,0.00019881838,0.00024710142,0.00018377749,0.0000794312,0.000025731046],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00046180314,0.00006942109,0.00014894633,0.00005411006,0.00007322066,0.000013874791,0.00036941317,0.000060053233,0.00003576873],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007603453,0.0000432846,0.00009448883,0.00013507165,0.00023187885,0.00007546338,0.00003461399,0.00007322578,9.1777326e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0015443757,0.000912934,0.32055077,0.00014315164,0.00017577683,0.000011546575,0.053339593,0.0005962508,0.018623682,0.5347433,0.046245474,0.023113139],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001205831,0.00029978796,0.32927787,0.00029618357,0.000031896958,0.0000024141414,0.0018579047,0.00007660477,0.009193714,0.0046301484,0.65297294,0.00015468898],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0575437,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014994193,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6067275,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000065089254,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017358123,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9487322},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1949110849","doi":"","title":"No Place Like Home: The Search for a Legal Framework for the Family Home in Canada and Britain","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Possession (linguistics); Autonomy; Law; Personhood; Property law; Political science; Law reform; Common law; Family law; Property rights; Sociology; Law and economics","score_opus":0.01483141649382996,"score_gpt":0.2700237786127038,"score_spread":0.25519236211887386,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1949110849","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9497326,0.001708068,0.004739779,0.028662233,0.0023115159,0.0023593705,0.000102526035,0.00006450029,0.0103194155],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9929091,0.00013509266,0.000456478,0.0028899855,0.00085693086,0.00016830093,0.000003191107,0.0000159455,0.0025649928],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986471,0.00016204492,0.00017128613,0.00022740768,0.00034922216,0.0004429592],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974581,0.0020217574,0.00004703344,0.00023093988,0.0001081422,0.00013404981],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016806884,0.000104147606,0.00015288926,0.000019322373,0.0010230606,0.0002686847,0.0003465058,0.00009403256,0.000035037385],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00027423433,0.000071714756,0.00005558938,0.00017115698,0.0001964405,0.00015363339,0.000050435123,0.00028591568,0.000006729996],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022382471,0.00003348804,0.012400832,0.00004960538,0.000042788022,0.000002152957,0.0037057654,0.000099249235,0.000052609506,0.9455818,0.019954586,0.01785329],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00043453823,0.00006595097,0.019261895,0.000031023013,0.000011754709,5.6253344e-7,0.002366863,0.00083829707,0.000007691232,0.004150512,0.9726987,0.00013222851],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9553165,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98670757,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9527441,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020244483,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007372187,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7868659},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W195455339","doi":"","title":"Memorandum on Jurisdictional Issues","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Summit (Simon Fraser University)","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Memorandum; Political science; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.02673619303779429,"score_gpt":0.25694770571366415,"score_spread":0.23021151267586987,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W195455339","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.64071053,0.000065831366,0.000085838736,0.0036873538,0.0006000139,0.0001444566,0.0000158145,0.00023311324,0.35445705],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9322616,0.00074223767,0.000054928427,0.00021043002,0.0004862999,4.0261443e-7,0.0000111601175,0.000008827731,0.06622412],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988809,0.00011497089,0.0000890471,0.00024075706,0.00041740277,0.0002569199],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994664,0.00006177794,0.00004994929,0.00015510194,0.00010273614,0.00016399662],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00014636638,0.000107612745,0.00012666256,0.00023550699,0.0012011303,0.000023851802,0.00023377743,0.00012455428,0.001007392],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000020949208,0.0001233461,0.00010440193,0.00052315876,0.00028485106,0.00031233864,0.000031359574,0.00015525626,0.0002827463],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00034160473,0.00037621395,0.5530044,0.0000075256194,0.000092741946,0.0004961862,0.002058307,0.0000809202,0.000008960115,0.12790407,0.31010312,0.005526008],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00047310386,0.00006811976,0.004876415,0.0000095100595,0.00001501461,4.636386e-9,0.008181646,0.000011362078,0.00015027782,0.00020240944,0.9858673,0.00014482334],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020520438,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.038562145,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6757642,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015547815,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001427247,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999058},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1963493330","doi":"10.7202/042701ar","title":"Méthodologie conflictuelle et protection de l'incapable étranger","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Conflict of laws; Law; Private law; Political science; Law and economics; Public law; Sociology","score_opus":0.04107326155505436,"score_gpt":0.313102060231552,"score_spread":0.27202879867649765,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1963493330","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.74863356,0.00020896325,0.06654385,0.011925616,0.00020744873,0.00043806527,0.0000056628724,0.00035844467,0.1716784],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9703934,0.00029203345,0.0036749633,0.0015893318,0.00050693867,0.00005374385,0.000003719859,0.00001635671,0.023469523],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987816,0.00027483908,0.00013679745,0.0001852475,0.0002113126,0.00041020312],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99950784,0.000114792056,0.000061729996,0.00012883477,0.00005042278,0.00013635856],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016850445,0.000091434464,0.000118719676,0.0000667179,0.0005496645,0.00008684131,0.00015144025,0.0002995285,0.00042669062],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023150585,0.00010109965,0.00008216602,0.00016681002,0.00028086107,0.00019626698,0.000011985006,0.0003408327,0.0000696309],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014490615,0.00017886619,0.0027741813,0.000036464233,0.000074187155,0.000019304609,0.11006675,0.0007115573,0.015945222,0.5872397,0.004291951,0.27851692],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029752334,0.00005228378,0.0056478726,0.000012930099,0.000020120211,0.0000071684753,0.0020445213,0.00047739843,0.0017924057,0.00984868,0.9796216,0.00017751024],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003523192,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002798092,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97532964,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00081985554,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015172259,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.53260356},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1965852444","doi":"10.1111/j.1744-1617.2007.00139.x","title":"ROCK‐PAPER‐SCISSORS: PLAYING THE ODDS WITH THE LAW OF CHILD RELOCATION","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Relocation; Settlement (finance); Jurisdiction; Law; Adversarial system; Odds; Duty; Process (computing); Proposition; Political science; Sociology; Psychology; Business; Computer science","score_opus":0.021213584404343063,"score_gpt":0.3040934368450104,"score_spread":0.2828798524406673,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1965852444","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009577958,0.22727405,0.0023100693,0.15047804,0.0004145496,0.0018037873,0.0000046592045,0.00010742093,0.6080295],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92067754,0.06741609,0.0000342005,0.011095611,0.00031243783,0.000018495646,0.0000030408291,0.000009930941,0.00043262856],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99880296,0.0001480279,0.00024644088,0.00012837465,0.00047820932,0.00019596684],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991314,0.0002126333,0.00018327289,0.00027683866,0.0001516478,0.00004423656],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003067722,0.00008665486,0.00016972524,0.0000148426725,0.00093152234,0.00003375858,0.00029869,0.000047931415,0.00006233109],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007058189,0.00004326626,0.000075941774,0.00038636487,0.0001683764,0.00013956754,0.000023901777,0.00016407382,0.000024018747],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000074665375,0.00017139208,0.0011388346,0.0009854577,0.00016896226,0.0000067480332,0.02739344,0.000038453283,0.00032496607,0.64706653,0.060436588,0.26219398],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006633283,0.0000307223,0.008466305,0.0012201379,0.0000663278,0.0000018351943,0.0013010303,0.0000064716774,0.000010229459,0.00004447472,0.9887173,0.000068840214],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021338395,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003230758,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9282807,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000040195075,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006729781,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7164611},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1966565519","doi":"10.1093/jiplp/jps062","title":"Infringement for copying publicly filed court documents: class action certified in Ontario","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; Multiple Sclerosis Society of Canada; University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Copying; Class action; Law; Corporation; Certification; Economic Justice; Class (philosophy); Copyright infringement; Political science; Action (physics); Service (business); Business; Computer science; Intellectual property","score_opus":0.12448166996967591,"score_gpt":0.37367744676494447,"score_spread":0.24919577679526855,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1966565519","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4962901,0.00074497703,0.006278622,0.038941316,0.0064560757,0.0022030133,0.0000027741673,0.000090219,0.4489929],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9900057,0.00023451947,0.001622267,0.0013222692,0.0007108212,0.000025763196,0.0000020020634,0.000017921555,0.0060587716],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976908,0.0003003405,0.0006956381,0.00014619762,0.0006563723,0.0005106592],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99704766,0.0012069115,0.0006399778,0.00012165654,0.00075643416,0.00022733415],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0049945177,0.00014394848,0.00026108764,0.00014865509,0.00046916227,0.00032439354,0.00024118234,0.00013580723,0.0014070092],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005042003,0.00010156542,0.00013192851,0.00022446441,0.0000976973,0.004400879,0.000047811063,0.00062898756,0.000034802986],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.02282322,0.006939655,0.015943894,0.00016909822,0.0015518754,0.000045861703,0.56517535,0.00023600041,0.008175576,0.041442927,0.17533123,0.16216531],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00081423466,0.00045121464,0.00037234664,0.00007069965,0.000085458516,0.000030988198,0.009487806,0.00007002875,0.00054106256,0.00009461709,0.98783183,0.00014971498],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.119626075,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.18297806,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8125006,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015810675,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00066555105,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995058},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1977315401","doi":"10.1111/j.174-1617.2004.tb00663.x","title":"IS THE TURN TOWARD COLLABORATIVE LAW A TURN AWAY FROM JUSTICE?","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Law and economics; Law; Individualism; Private law; Power (physics); Sociology; Public law; Political science","score_opus":0.04771668560999327,"score_gpt":0.3491699588710791,"score_spread":0.30145327326108584,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1977315401","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007223937,0.49925616,0.0003513689,0.23394316,0.00200194,0.0019764549,0.00024469604,0.00019818099,0.2548041],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.37268916,0.55391943,0.00041222034,0.0698585,0.0015877222,0.00011521287,0.000025350755,0.000027454767,0.0013649553],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99839485,0.00023603803,0.00029531584,0.00025854976,0.0005389312,0.0002763384],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989679,0.0001683924,0.00016261498,0.0002963006,0.0002833579,0.00012146269],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00079341204,0.00015361552,0.00031817902,0.000014927333,0.00066425884,0.00013669515,0.00036015498,0.00009782918,0.00041361988],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000147623,0.000103734084,0.00014950009,0.00049008476,0.00026588023,0.00019423805,0.00004574863,0.00022088853,0.00038828998],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004224303,0.0003001426,0.00024241637,0.0011161523,0.00036803435,0.0000581448,0.1557738,0.000012411303,0.00031058048,0.4036861,0.345677,0.09241299],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018827045,0.000029797471,0.0010302112,0.0012333223,0.00026005026,4.965285e-7,0.0029677136,0.0000016810347,0.000015390106,0.0025122685,0.9916158,0.00014500864],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0111981835,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029804807,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6459388,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014505441,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00040255507,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99538636},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1977653990","doi":"10.7202/042927ar","title":"Le statut des obligations en droit international privé","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.009769131220409608,"score_gpt":0.26400302294101474,"score_spread":0.2542338917206051,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1977653990","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.631175,0.0013708479,0.019412484,0.033570398,0.0012360626,0.00020341991,0.00006792573,0.00012544403,0.31283844],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8466157,0.0015653902,0.004276691,0.0007123773,0.001678266,0.000019170739,0.000036225472,0.000022620397,0.14507358],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998428,0.00014027682,0.00028770143,0.0002710619,0.0003926595,0.00048033762],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99918467,0.00017413423,0.000121786354,0.00016216074,0.00012479072,0.00023247254],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00058791146,0.00014547621,0.00015460556,0.00011681055,0.0008100002,0.00018322135,0.00036722232,0.0003601125,0.0009976882],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015956197,0.00020000251,0.00015542666,0.00030881126,0.0012910123,0.00067275943,0.000040166364,0.0004323052,0.00025370647],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009271112,0.000110723784,0.0015445199,0.000010092388,0.00006561804,0.000006090596,0.028354283,0.00020569467,0.00016277301,0.7787223,0.00095586525,0.18985279],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035532375,0.000036876867,0.011410837,0.000051922754,0.000043848322,0.000012409136,0.003584421,0.0007185287,0.00023426196,0.06250981,0.9208221,0.00021967056],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0043549407,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009143118,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9198662,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019793015,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000613895,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99991554},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1986722370","doi":"10.1017/s0020589314000621","title":"CHOICE-OF-COURT AGREEMENTS, THE ITALIAN TORPEDO, AND THE RECAST OF THE BRUSSELS I REGULATION","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International and Comparative Law Quarterly","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trinity College","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Law; Prima facie; Supreme court; Political science","score_opus":0.08029000003947137,"score_gpt":0.3381065878157076,"score_spread":0.2578165877762363,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1986722370","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8939133,0.00021040757,0.00010493978,0.017219903,0.00054439873,0.00029076388,0.0000139186695,0.000006941326,0.08769539],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979674,0.000009061695,0.000013823216,0.00013025528,0.00017802622,0.000008791296,0.0000019197769,0.0000014069603,0.0016892864],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99914056,0.00018948535,0.00017673982,0.00008454198,0.0003453952,0.00006327747],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993331,0.00017166273,0.00016940462,0.00008866026,0.00020898091,0.00002818832],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00045146496,0.000055385703,0.00009829753,0.000012078535,0.00022667581,0.000061469225,0.00019334028,0.000023587152,0.00003292923],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000013161402,0.000027220492,0.00003858285,0.00006610748,0.0007843449,0.00016101902,0.000020904694,0.000054701097,0.0000016679187],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007830878,0.000028191509,0.0031733033,0.0000017143808,0.000056813,6.323288e-8,0.07422786,0.0000051680477,0.00007619403,0.91745496,0.00085795805,0.00403945],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0024534627,0.0003389026,0.18256608,0.0000867244,0.00006820647,0.0000041164303,0.042348698,0.0016604027,0.00038432254,0.09617276,0.6737456,0.00017076998],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006171589,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0068172915,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8212822,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000017448185,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000028220931,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9329637},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1988282677","doi":"10.1002/crq.3890180404","title":"Money and mediation: Patterns of conflict in family mediation of financial matters","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Mediation Quarterly","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"College of Family Physicians of Canada; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Mediation; Negotiation; Conflict resolution; Psychology; Social psychology; Political science; Business; Law and economics; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.014540606464888065,"score_gpt":0.27174428040402865,"score_spread":0.25720367393914056,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1988282677","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9944833,0.00012019043,0.0009023978,0.003069759,0.00046742024,0.00025280743,0.00002170402,0.000023460903,0.0006589748],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987835,0.000473056,0.00005485452,0.00025409137,0.00030275199,0.000020588323,0.000037280428,0.0000068521167,0.00006696988],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99852085,0.00014795309,0.00048430357,0.00016571138,0.00050320936,0.00017799533],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99918216,0.00017610064,0.00031684455,0.00010617641,0.0001389341,0.00007976356],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00069118786,0.00009203006,0.00021427087,0.00022472416,0.0000707831,0.00001954281,0.000095601696,0.00013086307,0.00009440014],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011492283,0.00010016337,0.00003999227,0.00028979802,0.000089709196,0.00033083136,0.0000060927296,0.00008221946,0.000005087852],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008203607,0.00014069692,0.6925295,0.000057894184,0.000011847562,0.000004566051,0.1888983,0.000020142914,0.003764863,0.0046200324,0.0004717241,0.1093984],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009839592,0.00022180716,0.97702086,0.000026662014,0.000009824989,5.0051233e-7,0.0053671543,0.00030475386,0.00013271572,0.00040324827,0.015396187,0.0001323326],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033350238,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0054216925,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28449136,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006152852,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011118735,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.504158},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1988350243","doi":"10.1177/08969205000260010901","title":"Book Review: Blomley, Nicholas K. Law, Space, and the Geographies of Power (1994/1998). New York: Guilford Press","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Critical Sociology","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Power (physics); Sociology; Law and economics; Space (punctuation); Economic geography; Media studies; Philosophy; Economics; Physics; Thermodynamics; Linguistics","score_opus":0.02061286424465531,"score_gpt":0.3185644563102595,"score_spread":0.2979515920656042,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1988350243","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008537318,0.6487631,0.00003132694,0.10142843,0.00037684938,0.0005198839,0.000013354857,0.00008038102,0.24024934],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5352646,0.34918845,0.00022605587,0.081799924,0.0011085366,0.00007623376,0.000009340973,0.000033145407,0.032293692],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985523,0.00042132864,0.00027544372,0.00020930546,0.00018802275,0.00035356978],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998738,0.0008437873,0.000043096792,0.00019598799,0.000037757247,0.00014140818],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007841779,0.000108074775,0.00033950625,0.000017754315,0.00046917488,0.000028583681,0.00021841055,0.00020478948,0.002589914],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00029493013,0.000076852906,0.00014338728,0.00008101858,0.006437288,0.00011228846,0.00004615341,0.00021958907,0.000018930275],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000051424882,0.000033354587,0.00013731974,0.0000447599,0.000027785156,0.0000013974163,0.0049828556,1.2521159e-7,0.000005745956,0.7457159,0.24589926,0.0031000648],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039124212,0.00006733948,0.0003632008,0.00006981156,0.00007279497,0.0000022060603,0.00026364042,0.000002113447,0.000004775322,0.02038124,0.97829264,0.00008900555],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033165128,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00017317124,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7323934,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000011809221,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004682953,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99832183},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1990109432","doi":"","title":"The Canadian Codification of Forum Non Conveniens","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Section (typography); Common law; Statutory law; Jurisdiction; Law; Supreme court; Jurisprudence; Nova scotia; Statute; Political science; Doctrine; Choice of law; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.020152470256363332,"score_gpt":0.26346658868257483,"score_spread":0.2433141184262115,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1990109432","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5372653,0.0027479713,0.0026737077,0.022174912,0.0017260428,0.00056833285,0.0000056258386,0.000043039498,0.43279505],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9953164,0.002487453,0.000008973991,0.000039462135,0.00012043687,0.0000020152052,4.9830555e-7,0.0000042996166,0.0020204524],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984613,0.00006565169,0.00014498176,0.00005578594,0.00018535582,0.0010869277],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99953526,0.000023538945,0.0001218084,0.000080353755,0.0001368364,0.00010221047],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019868428,0.000040924555,0.00005435358,0.000048990758,0.0013386563,0.00003526635,0.00020903815,0.000052955216,0.000041137257],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000046936013,0.000031060757,0.000051073217,0.0001119142,0.00015041769,0.0000966761,0.000005019103,0.0004131598,0.00001216999],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012862124,0.000010195504,0.0042505353,3.737405e-7,0.00002571336,3.0173757e-7,0.006345408,2.1235078e-7,0.000048095455,0.95388365,0.0001431593,0.035279524],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00043782985,0.00035205352,0.020709049,0.000013220601,0.00004273101,0.000031969896,0.048899725,0.00004849841,0.00033976277,0.36443153,0.56451803,0.00017557669],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.35113338,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97486794,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6237346,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006874845,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004917896,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99996144},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1990832992","doi":"10.1163/15718190119684829","title":"J. Harries, Law and Empire in Late Antiquity","year":2001,"lang":"nl","type":"article","venue":"Tijdschrift voor Rechtsgeschiedenis / Revue d Histoire du Droit / The Legal History Review","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Inversa Systems (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Empire; Ancient history; Philosophy; Art; Law; History; Political science","score_opus":0.027285101639700257,"score_gpt":0.2604430926201265,"score_spread":0.23315799098042622,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1990832992","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0065929103,0.6221528,0.00000901515,0.024907866,0.003637914,0.0018680404,0.000039402534,0.00022347552,0.34056854],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1532529,0.6417413,0.00005780781,0.010174935,0.0015816137,0.00019524664,0.000049570554,0.00016853705,0.19277814],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9923844,0.0018071386,0.0019506876,0.0015412252,0.0009980486,0.0013185351],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959242,0.00039480248,0.0011820091,0.0015843628,0.0003019585,0.0006127052],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.004837022,0.0009868899,0.002039217,0.0002513915,0.0027480265,0.00023486465,0.0014954361,0.0006803342,0.0022859087],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004940828,0.0009371481,0.00072769343,0.0010722842,0.003358617,0.0010530504,0.00036696848,0.001997702,0.0007478704],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006219011,0.0011123691,0.001294674,0.010295662,0.0003389636,0.002086583,0.025037574,0.000010369406,0.00027272466,0.5792255,0.18898731,0.19071637],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00076534046,0.00020742184,0.00045955268,0.007204356,0.0004990239,0.00029277647,0.00016481026,0.00008390527,0.000002907468,0.00044649566,0.98880327,0.0010701627],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023355544,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06689783,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.79981595,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023965503,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007275188,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99935365},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1991407196","doi":"10.3406/ridc.2008.19628","title":"La cession de créances en droit international privé québécois","year":2008,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue internationale de droit comparé","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.024036278501408385,"score_gpt":0.29449140862774564,"score_spread":0.27045513012633726,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1991407196","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8039161,0.0027811527,0.0053946497,0.012998102,0.003396992,0.00019435813,0.000069678645,0.00011951695,0.17112945],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9092491,0.008933319,0.0011524239,0.00041111998,0.0030722246,0.000038296228,0.000054509233,0.00002998745,0.077059],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99748486,0.00036409052,0.00054142525,0.0004309498,0.0006995411,0.0004791372],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99822193,0.0006859175,0.00034075865,0.00021203818,0.00028299916,0.00025632433],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00091048056,0.00022891114,0.00030962395,0.0002076358,0.0003797931,0.00013194788,0.0008996441,0.00030599727,0.0017213464],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00027568117,0.0003043314,0.0002681976,0.00027379248,0.0005003178,0.0005922309,0.00012818302,0.00049388484,0.00033624674],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011624393,0.0010138291,0.19017819,0.000119026794,0.00041781043,0.0004989039,0.053526103,0.0013736193,0.0005179732,0.5841158,0.0090796575,0.15904282],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00049945625,0.00004655667,0.0986824,0.00047523933,0.000038628463,0.0004965334,0.000992795,0.010827196,0.00015238934,0.011310965,0.8761625,0.00031530927],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014665745,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0080616595,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8670829,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019450489,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005938449,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999409},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1995152663","doi":"","title":"The Movement of U.S. Criminal and Administrative Law: Processes of Transplanting and Translating","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University)","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Legal pluralism; Legal culture; Political science; Legal realism; Comparative law; Legal research; Sociology","score_opus":0.03121101605329381,"score_gpt":0.26539013034974923,"score_spread":0.2341791142964554,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1995152663","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.63052577,0.000011679948,0.00010223116,0.00044560575,0.000021060157,0.00036353618,0.000009601621,0.000017735692,0.36850277],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97411144,0.02564817,0.00019036909,0.000013794449,0.000016875809,0.0000012057162,7.558604e-7,0.0000031934132,0.0000141717455],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994129,0.00006761499,0.00011779193,0.0001184526,0.00014712509,0.00013614817],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99952984,0.00014243703,0.00010586096,0.000051784937,0.00013428542,0.000035777026],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00016055269,0.00006722158,0.000105974,0.00039164006,0.00040049225,0.000034597,0.00009204579,0.000039806266,0.0000077502],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000024165536,0.00005662669,0.00002445497,0.0008152791,0.00037712615,0.0002740582,0.000016652803,0.000057428908,1.2188046e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019152295,0.00017343037,0.007136192,0.00076120684,0.0001399186,0.000009818693,0.6472681,0.0000020559519,0.00065343414,0.18669055,0.000008683737,0.15696508],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011084126,0.00049580925,0.0028316714,0.00026908956,0.0002191327,0.0000022215909,0.13278244,0.00010902672,0.0065249773,0.000063842344,0.85531783,0.0002755223],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.14293924,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09891494,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8553092,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000013071808,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020229268,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9175275},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1996654317","doi":"10.1108/03090550210770489","title":"The internal grievance process and grievance arbitration in Quebec: an illustration of the North‐American methods of resolving disputes arising from the application of collective agreements","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Law and Management","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Grievance; Arbitration; Jurisdiction; Dispute resolution; Process (computing); Field (mathematics); Law; Dispute mechanism; Political science; Law and economics; Online dispute resolution; Business; Alternative dispute resolution; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.01932219873718558,"score_gpt":0.34113065041913115,"score_spread":0.32180845168194555,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1996654317","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9746485,0.0003283535,0.018428372,0.0025719542,0.00024331028,0.00029507728,0.0000068978584,0.0000021677959,0.0034753818],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981112,0.0008197763,0.000818024,0.0000903155,0.000081326245,0.0000049256714,8.117793e-7,0.0000024000115,0.00007124442],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99889,0.00017872361,0.0003813431,0.00008275052,0.00040615196,0.000061061735],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998691,0.00021007031,0.0007379294,0.00007210792,0.0002706759,0.000018188302],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006780817,0.000051746945,0.000100960824,0.000035250636,0.00014966006,0.000056905654,0.0002641395,0.000014396528,0.0000022333031],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000057865,0.000031461845,0.000031139636,0.0001426043,0.00034432713,0.00029942286,0.00004132851,0.000081205966,2.4884288e-8],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004688478,0.0003652381,0.15437935,0.00004690327,0.00048226616,0.000002536301,0.07213897,0.0010188885,0.002344488,0.21551116,0.000060659437,0.5531807],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009632049,0.00020695703,0.9433972,0.00037409578,0.00010901098,0.0000026856692,0.013202215,0.007064448,0.0025525359,0.012891143,0.019103965,0.00013252538],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011793438,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.092130095,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.78901786,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006358311,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000022842218,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9947871},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1997108446","doi":"10.7202/1027329ar","title":"Forum of necessity in Quebec Private International Law: C.c.Q. art. 3136","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"University of Ottawa; U.S. Department of Justice","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Law; Context (archaeology); Jurisprudence; Doctrine; Subject-matter jurisdiction; Political science; Appeal; Relation (database); Discretion; Common law; Subject (documents); Legislature; Law and economics; Sociology; Original jurisdiction; Computer science","score_opus":0.009973752715564773,"score_gpt":0.2611702568633445,"score_spread":0.2511965041477797,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1997108446","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6845858,0.000011326777,0.00077502726,0.004572032,0.0003350661,0.00010278071,0.0000046333566,0.00003370397,0.30957964],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99045026,0.000041902393,0.00022118758,0.00021583358,0.0002557026,0.0000066586276,0.000008704792,0.0000059246418,0.008793804],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99920565,0.0000752784,0.0001988252,0.00013602655,0.00017334662,0.00021088649],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995953,0.00006421939,0.00010535339,0.00012650022,0.000045305947,0.0000633215],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00053906435,0.00004587935,0.00013288688,0.00006240556,0.00008500843,0.000038938648,0.00022953078,0.000073496136,0.000135017],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001010324,0.000067726214,0.00006180976,0.0001268905,0.00010964933,0.00021814015,0.000039918134,0.00009439556,0.000034605346],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020566531,0.00007600786,0.07286303,0.000021178337,0.000010073707,0.0000036325737,0.00341789,0.000039757502,0.0005344959,0.90189767,0.00042688625,0.020688817],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006639836,0.000051593175,0.15471922,0.00017364587,0.000013215169,0.0000025731,0.000602794,0.0015157397,0.0007646943,0.1133868,0.7278619,0.00024388236],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.028492115,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.19677821,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.78851086,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001667053,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000043854263,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9779772},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1998171206","doi":"","title":"From Reaction to Agency: A 'Subaltern' Response to William Twining's Globalisation and Legal Scholarship","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Centre for International Governance Innovation","funders":"","keywords":"Legal pluralism; Subaltern; Jurisprudence; Law; Legal realism; Globalization; Political science; Sociology; Scholarship; Empirical legal studies; Agency (philosophy); Comparative law; Social science","score_opus":0.014250340757953261,"score_gpt":0.30465085906985534,"score_spread":0.29040051831190206,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1998171206","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9794509,0.00015841727,0.005638504,0.0116133895,0.00047808865,0.0001530577,0.0000031037448,0.000051564308,0.0024529893],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99589235,0.00028672817,0.0001722182,0.0007663848,0.0014899498,0.000005266443,0.0000018573858,0.000012201342,0.0013730642],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974468,0.00058304204,0.00021737024,0.00023803023,0.00045102555,0.0010637731],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99925053,0.000117915784,0.00010542613,0.00012633379,0.00011446928,0.00028530628],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006016686,0.0001095516,0.00012900638,0.00013549997,0.00067419745,0.00030352955,0.00018053193,0.00009335367,0.00001944173],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00080636085,0.000112236296,0.000052816235,0.00026666958,0.000034049404,0.0005632197,0.00002833198,0.00064873474,0.000056403314],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0032474,0.00010666781,0.010501158,0.0000031146533,0.00014772217,0.000008109784,0.030300507,0.0000367673,0.052386355,0.19793813,0.0005466788,0.7047774],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00062638934,0.0008468547,0.09781461,0.000050739756,0.000043259402,0.000035801095,0.0031240382,0.000020708427,0.00017871209,0.09452259,0.8024556,0.00028068072],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002913629,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013339943,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8019089,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011222094,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009262645,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.74440014},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2000066111","doi":"10.1017/s1472669600001444","title":"Flag The New Internet Gateway to Foreign Law Holdings in UK National and University Libraries","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Information Management","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Future Earth","funders":"","keywords":"Gateway (web page); Legislation; The Internet; Political science; Flag (linear algebra); Law library; Library science; International law; Law; Public administration; World Wide Web; Computer science","score_opus":0.017478508039495244,"score_gpt":0.22591805301329315,"score_spread":0.2084395449737979,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2000066111","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0058166,0.000018158384,0.0017249492,0.017707247,0.000083668645,0.0002789696,0.000001578287,0.00005143734,0.9743174],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9794604,0.000052140345,0.0003711603,0.0026065826,0.00004592175,0.000002160723,0.0000031524953,0.0000016381376,0.01745685],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99949646,0.00001947024,0.0001035771,0.000050574443,0.00022845104,0.00010147308],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999837,0.0000150443875,0.0000372911,0.000043044918,0.000019898327,0.000047721896],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00022032193,0.00004261872,0.000037848484,0.000093296345,0.00019462859,0.0003186422,0.00011804574,0.000023243374,0.00034673413],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000009219422,0.000038073802,0.000014584951,0.0002090418,0.00005344389,0.0017735707,0.00007414188,0.000045591532,0.00012030174],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006409422,0.0000032416265,0.00008263821,0.000003120154,0.000005043063,5.224947e-7,0.014151098,0.000049515147,1.6149438e-7,0.92995906,0.048595414,0.007143766],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017168562,0.000012022954,0.0022457433,0.000008988773,0.0000029876066,1.8042252e-7,0.004679026,0.00069976156,0.000004327706,0.002406277,0.98972017,0.00004884945],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003101222,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015524068,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9736438,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007540605,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000092987575,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.46881407},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2000981688","doi":"10.7202/043834ar","title":"La codification internationale du droit international privé : un échec ?","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.011161736375773083,"score_gpt":0.253255779957406,"score_spread":0.24209404358163292,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2000981688","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6839239,0.0009880962,0.022042459,0.046220515,0.0018533203,0.00021648344,0.000054602067,0.000129096,0.24457154],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8852309,0.002300086,0.0016884936,0.0008668729,0.0024081087,0.000027254935,0.00007338202,0.000025163657,0.10737971],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99817544,0.0001973777,0.00036786654,0.00034265872,0.00055463833,0.00036199755],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99895006,0.00026033027,0.00022648525,0.00018655935,0.0001852835,0.00019127605],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009847997,0.00017392369,0.00016491527,0.00013633318,0.0003968313,0.00019030325,0.0005096341,0.00047253925,0.0023939137],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021747102,0.00023075192,0.00017217682,0.00026608212,0.00082966016,0.0005100034,0.000046483103,0.0005095744,0.00040188016],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018665509,0.00016348656,0.0024229456,0.000008406247,0.00008239385,0.0000095457735,0.0151297,0.00009289763,0.00014791302,0.5367826,0.001246195,0.44389525],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004930243,0.000028476,0.016373392,0.00005300696,0.000054289914,0.000037699887,0.0013788908,0.004701379,0.00028105255,0.021301825,0.95505494,0.00024201063],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009252915,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001129727,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9538088,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025965406,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014431428,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99851805},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2004089465","doi":"10.7202/042387ar","title":"Les réactions de la doctrine à la création du droit par les juges en droit international privé","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Doctrine; Harmony (color); Political science; Modernization theory; Conflict of laws; Phenomenon; Law; Humanities; Welfare economics; Law and economics; Philosophy; Sociology; Economics; Physics; Epistemology","score_opus":0.007098500986316761,"score_gpt":0.27817793460019846,"score_spread":0.2710794336138817,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2004089465","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.76516724,0.00010450691,0.0141904885,0.005693095,0.00021404037,0.00017095952,0.00001903623,0.00023716156,0.21420349],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98392725,0.00088984874,0.001400733,0.00022022541,0.0013314035,0.00003744349,0.00003342885,0.000021898695,0.012137769],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984961,0.00026631512,0.0002563779,0.00025905712,0.00038078756,0.00034136765],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989662,0.00049879483,0.00013600361,0.00014877856,0.00009392404,0.00015626923],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011157623,0.00014254684,0.00015896415,0.00017461987,0.0008483996,0.00022984078,0.00032161476,0.00040290505,0.0005766093],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00034263555,0.00017378363,0.00013482112,0.00018730926,0.000526305,0.0003638952,0.00003297591,0.00045027788,0.00004004275],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004421724,0.00018311657,0.027520934,0.00001209823,0.000114699855,0.000017858869,0.020977905,0.00039368984,0.0012298931,0.6822315,0.0013514449,0.26592267],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00044514748,0.000029820052,0.097168885,0.000027899854,0.000060030165,0.000028198796,0.0019447249,0.0008481137,0.00054499955,0.01812964,0.8805333,0.00023924586],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0047117276,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003907347,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87918186,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013874834,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013487373,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7122754},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W200675586","doi":"","title":"Mutual recognition of cultural diversity: legal pluralism in Britain and Canada in the 21st century","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Figshare","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Diversity (politics); Cultural diversity; Pluralism (philosophy); Cultural pluralism; Political science; Sociology; Law; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.029757983503528106,"score_gpt":0.2597785624777074,"score_spread":0.23002057897417932,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W200675586","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97090787,0.000050737704,1.893493e-9,0.0014913991,0.00009514652,0.00012763767,0.010691018,0.0000056341514,0.016630579],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9975708,0.000021195448,0.0000019606655,0.00012713294,0.00010472391,0.000005536046,0.0021154126,0.0000012331265,0.00005200465],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995398,0.000050816278,0.00006780058,0.000069201604,0.00017012055,0.00010227974],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99979883,0.00006349106,0.000031852436,0.00003750803,0.000042591,0.00002570642],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000098927594,0.000034644116,0.000049139497,0.000022061913,0.00014953945,0.00003172356,0.00009672208,0.000047172187,0.004813105],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00024553473,0.000028543776,0.000012215879,0.00009321199,0.000017386954,0.00016778686,0.000046970614,0.00013757696,0.0000044551107],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008628351,0.00016556503,0.053060625,0.00017648682,0.000025922318,0.00020440151,0.34678152,0.0000028928687,0.00039822582,0.0052372226,0.3153472,0.27851367],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002673297,0.000012736375,0.14599599,0.00016286936,0.0000028005265,0.0000023739908,0.031176334,0.0000071980585,0.000027999868,0.000046754798,0.8222043,0.00009332192],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8286883,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9914238,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5068571,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003252173,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010013778,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9960966},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2011758464","doi":"10.7202/042166ar","title":"Quelques commentaires sur le rapport de l 'Office de revision du Code civil sur le droit international privé","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Civil code; Political science; Law; Conflict of laws; Code (set theory); Humanities; Library science; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.016545748258485024,"score_gpt":0.26272795850372177,"score_spread":0.24618221024523673,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2011758464","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9229081,0.00027200955,0.009532534,0.019594437,0.00021743226,0.00020945721,0.000022231017,0.00021665716,0.047027122],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98919153,0.000899015,0.0010419459,0.002558931,0.00067755574,0.000013825315,0.00004432412,0.000023364355,0.0055495044],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99846476,0.00017250048,0.00027853684,0.0002587112,0.00038420333,0.00044125572],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992006,0.00015392776,0.0001474761,0.00017495768,0.000120209974,0.00020282087],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001391755,0.00013602512,0.00018233653,0.000091332455,0.0006361831,0.00017456095,0.00040913522,0.00022911705,0.00023399624],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002461928,0.00016698035,0.00013524666,0.00013612877,0.00030744102,0.00042902562,0.000050158586,0.00028992596,0.000020558959],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00036383557,0.0013150021,0.13677214,0.00008485282,0.00030975233,0.00012399459,0.10547765,0.00042397034,0.0052612256,0.35642868,0.09666863,0.29677024],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007416329,0.00003548518,0.020098321,0.000064832515,0.000024980402,0.000016828244,0.0027082064,0.0016640858,0.0016779408,0.003043332,0.9696666,0.00025773008],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023371788,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02632487,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.872998,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013899327,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00071915187,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99144214},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2012492497","doi":"10.7202/042288ar","title":"La Cour suprême et les communications","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Broadcasting (networking); Jurisdiction; Legislation; Service (business); Law; Parliament; Business; Power (physics); Telecommunications; Political science; Engineering; Computer security; Politics; Computer science; Marketing","score_opus":0.019773996659117686,"score_gpt":0.31330528410558284,"score_spread":0.29353128744646517,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2012492497","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5331021,0.00057961314,0.001830331,0.028268153,0.000056614343,0.00011797203,0.000011684592,0.00017287287,0.43586066],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98024756,0.0010095958,0.0015198075,0.00060109515,0.00013827544,0.000011115735,0.000007834619,0.000008514777,0.016456213],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992352,0.00024010343,0.00010165937,0.00008975795,0.00015288149,0.00018038231],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993434,0.00024155191,0.00004204213,0.00024997033,0.000037623635,0.00008541653],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00080001,0.000054297274,0.00007342557,0.0000404542,0.0006304936,0.000077901306,0.00031495868,0.0001947827,0.00016171605],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000900872,0.00006215179,0.000055193836,0.00011222931,0.00054513046,0.00012926363,0.000027437429,0.00032922524,0.000044412078],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004136011,0.0000482008,0.002408154,0.0000023652253,0.000012857548,0.0000014225509,0.038474537,0.0000120738905,0.000099071156,0.85057145,0.0015366263,0.10682913],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011467306,0.000008336575,0.0071008373,0.000007826125,0.000011384722,0.0000022005586,0.004129379,0.00011987743,0.000023311868,0.0031700032,0.98523337,0.00007879094],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004282777,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016173268,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98369676,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026830906,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008175014,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.90250635},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2012580666","doi":"10.7202/1027080ar","title":"Véronique Fortin, Myriam Jézéquel, Nicholas Kasirer (dir.), Les sept péchés capitaux et le droit privé, Montréal, Éditions Thémis, 2007, 290 pages, ISBN 978-2-89400-240-7 Nadine Watté, Le droit patrimonial des familles en droit international privé : perspectives du récent Code belge, Montréal, Éditions Thémis, 2008, 78 pages, ISBN 978-2-89400-253-7","year":2009,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Art; Political science","score_opus":0.01188745430252379,"score_gpt":0.24681922050558408,"score_spread":0.23493176620306028,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2012580666","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.36328465,0.24178733,0.017355971,0.27684778,0.005373836,0.00659141,0.009059334,0.0022077872,0.07749191],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7195814,0.22836576,0.0037093891,0.0011729273,0.0057008234,0.00057076354,0.0025029494,0.00034126267,0.03805469],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98852044,0.0012438605,0.0026686492,0.0026399156,0.0018923872,0.0030347176],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99291897,0.0008110995,0.0016145712,0.0016274826,0.0015132227,0.0015146413],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaepi_narrow","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025030484,0.0015354055,0.001915093,0.0008680473,0.0047178394,0.0012160613,0.0021505116,0.001701588,0.0019997954],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009918194,0.0022016126,0.0016536374,0.0015621543,0.0021390272,0.0031309677,0.000493843,0.0024947317,0.00032896342],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00059733074,0.009439138,0.00622589,0.00045740596,0.0019593076,0.0011340952,0.027520556,0.0034125848,0.0028198443,0.48562923,0.40580535,0.054999266],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006034083,0.0012063592,0.08080416,0.0018399046,0.001173989,0.00086354767,0.023323525,0.004146607,0.00071163813,0.115553685,0.76049846,0.0038440314],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.060526215,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.074998856,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.37007555,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0048961854,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022932924,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99982077},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2014252366","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-2230.2009.00733.x","title":"Cohabitation and Comparative Method","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Law Review","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Canadian Association of Physicists","funders":"","keywords":"Cohabitation; Legislature; Sociology; Family law; Comparative law; Political science; Law; Common law; Gender studies","score_opus":0.15754106484424277,"score_gpt":0.4168717554287403,"score_spread":0.25933069058449754,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2014252366","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020515252,0.3480262,0.03664632,0.013966545,0.00026966538,0.0015578809,0.000007296414,0.00022284816,0.578788],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88941807,0.10322517,0.0032771514,0.0027776614,0.00010550253,0.00003113154,0.000004204839,0.000004704224,0.0011564016],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993137,0.00021263059,0.00011631238,0.00011165001,0.00015373534,0.000091944115],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99970996,0.00005809345,0.000048822618,0.000066379565,0.00006159008,0.00005514857],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00045037598,0.000049870352,0.00016907975,0.000008110517,0.00040554276,0.000013270721,0.00004493243,0.00002561396,0.00006088733],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000020492023,0.000044384175,0.00003365095,0.00007536084,0.00014022698,0.00013567659,0.000010428279,0.00004526221,0.000023109593],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000040717896,0.00003216592,0.0003764391,0.00025894627,0.00001739393,0.0000033712406,0.019996913,0.0000017059559,0.00004835453,0.90549016,0.0020016655,0.07176881],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007460128,0.00001548129,0.0010163087,0.00028299654,0.00002199344,0.000004340043,0.000032305656,0.00016904794,0.000010180168,0.0029223962,0.9953783,0.00007204107],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001082538,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007862114,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9933766,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000018781513,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000027008611,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3119148},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2016150660","doi":"10.1080/03050718.2012.748258","title":"Private international law and the Internet, 2nd edn","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Commonwealth Law Bulletin","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"The Internet; Law; Political science; Conflict of laws; Law and economics; Sociology; Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.01425567974650163,"score_gpt":0.27534418013345546,"score_spread":0.26108850038695386,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2016150660","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03572308,0.00030487753,0.00007483338,0.17140679,0.00072877173,0.00046057603,0.0000021232574,0.00008548937,0.79121345],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9790417,0.00027089447,0.00013643842,0.0129015595,0.00040281616,0.000053810214,0.0000042664196,0.0000092648925,0.0071792835],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99888813,0.00023512205,0.00021620115,0.00016412669,0.00025859525,0.00023781146],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992875,0.0002420449,0.00009995891,0.00016704819,0.000081155566,0.00012228754],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00082140346,0.00008905546,0.00013199767,0.000016871041,0.00055943656,0.00028041075,0.0003528589,0.000066942695,0.0031707266],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005228857,0.00006455928,0.000046484027,0.00004867927,0.00097197545,0.00008802264,0.00015194823,0.0001819672,0.00036076864],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022964548,0.000019728404,0.00033620157,0.0000036292406,0.000011571333,6.4740107e-7,0.0030864265,2.6347703e-7,0.0000028795316,0.97593224,0.017168302,0.0034151238],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005939683,0.000018895145,0.0010632735,0.00001821558,0.000005403198,0.0000015928764,0.00034170525,0.000057096815,0.00000977536,0.010769521,0.9870439,0.00007664398],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07069427,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008850611,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96987563,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000047694153,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000018266695,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9977405},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2021063160","doi":"10.7202/042413ar","title":"L'autorisation d'exercer le recours collectif","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Students Commission","funders":"","keywords":"Paragraph; Constitution; Plaintiff; Class (philosophy); Law; Political science; Character (mathematics); Unitary state; Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy; Mathematics","score_opus":0.010472280983543027,"score_gpt":0.2598584058930552,"score_spread":0.24938612490951217,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2021063160","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.72425926,0.00011009348,0.0028553815,0.0071890806,0.00033663504,0.00016060076,0.0000026411021,0.000183097,0.2649032],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9340557,0.00015475716,0.000775794,0.00043713575,0.0008066172,0.0000138617315,0.000004139223,0.000011524825,0.06374046],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992091,0.000072215895,0.000116171315,0.00014151484,0.00021046096,0.00025053107],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996329,0.00006180521,0.00005368462,0.000097690754,0.000049139788,0.0001047638],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00050966453,0.000063119805,0.00008615971,0.000066077286,0.0007199244,0.00007951435,0.00010814558,0.00019475936,0.00031132856],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008847422,0.00007622343,0.00006078018,0.00022526397,0.00018256514,0.00019110327,0.0000064132832,0.00016996652,0.000056291952],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000053278294,0.00012364428,0.00454412,0.000008863836,0.000045354103,0.0000057739912,0.12147473,0.00018805538,0.0009910639,0.23563783,0.029795796,0.6071315],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022289614,0.00002031249,0.0077656894,0.0000066706825,0.000013252243,0.0000014959442,0.0036483034,0.00020680773,0.00032761716,0.0048718704,0.98279285,0.00012220965],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004302545,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006183853,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9529971,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010243928,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020718054,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.65041894},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2021718236","doi":"10.1111/j.1559-3584.2000.tb03358.x","title":"The Frank G. Law Award","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Naval Engineers Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Lockheed Martin (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Service (business); Set (abstract data type); Engineering; Political science; Management; Law and economics; Sociology; Computer science; Business; Economics; Programming language","score_opus":0.00826888216165331,"score_gpt":0.26846854592630875,"score_spread":0.2601996637646554,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2021718236","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11274101,0.0026179696,0.00084224105,0.024793113,0.0033444348,0.00016772003,0.0000029543155,0.000176976,0.8553136],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98335123,0.0031070067,0.000097256794,0.00032794932,0.00168193,0.0000018610248,3.5955705e-7,0.000009661811,0.011422722],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999102,0.00006298593,0.00013333719,0.000057926714,0.0003802358,0.00026349808],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99961674,0.00008649507,0.00002635976,0.00006961919,0.000054832733,0.0001459447],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00077544193,0.00005761942,0.000062342326,0.000018547282,0.0014620012,0.00022542858,0.0001880985,0.00006002911,0.0012344231],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003887868,0.00004061462,0.00008762693,0.000115385716,0.00014185718,0.00015769983,0.0000041532326,0.0002970341,0.00013673455],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000090630725,0.00005667914,0.00024366839,0.0000030289432,0.0001157097,0.00004089002,0.022528253,0.0022335488,0.000108748165,0.25293452,0.05822949,0.66341484],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015810903,0.000021541757,0.0002874143,0.0000057521256,0.0000078137255,0.000018313256,0.00055890053,0.00015221811,0.000012459981,0.0006584917,0.9980608,0.00005813603],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000401679,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00019836695,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9398314,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000061221406,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000676704,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99983793},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2022829871","doi":"10.1108/17542431111147783","title":"Lessons learned from a comparative examination of global civil justice reforms","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Law and Management","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Originality; Scope (computer science); Economic Justice; Mediation; Civil procedure; Alternative dispute resolution; Value (mathematics); Civil society; Dispute resolution; Public administration; Political science; Judicial reform; Sociology; Law; Law and economics; Public relations; Computer science","score_opus":0.13252499292022324,"score_gpt":0.38311593089861873,"score_spread":0.2505909379783955,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2022829871","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21499217,0.00012825103,0.0021795717,0.0019903886,0.0008731691,0.000082998056,0.000016818618,0.000007984399,0.77972865],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978852,0.0008375806,0.00073502073,0.00014737489,0.00015463454,0.0000011098458,0.0000019260508,0.0000015531779,0.00023556402],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99917585,0.00005383796,0.0002259531,0.00006830614,0.00041087947,0.00006519696],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993547,0.000025173204,0.0002631136,0.000039546514,0.00027165195,0.00004581464],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004037508,0.000046609242,0.000099030214,0.000038252645,0.000075510616,0.00003273929,0.00018464941,0.00002586345,0.00011179593],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000010193401,0.000039310606,0.000042872,0.000045391025,0.00011124438,0.00025482388,0.000048366794,0.000043921045,0.0000022994507],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009113878,0.000106377796,0.00019701292,0.0000057451007,0.00021080438,0.000018152306,0.014180914,0.0000036591473,0.000025966923,0.9558252,0.00012131573,0.029213674],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002771686,0.00040098606,0.29079017,0.0003521372,0.0005391957,0.000012313067,0.03208936,0.000119185795,0.0004659147,0.10527212,0.5669155,0.00027139476],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002096297,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025498492,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8505531,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009027195,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000018027918,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31689882},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2027083919","doi":"10.1002/iir.186","title":"When Hong Kong becomes SAR, is the mainland ready? Problems of judgments recognition in cross‐border insolvency matters","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Insolvency Review","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mainland China; Insolvency; China; Mainland; Law; Political science; Political status of Taiwan; The Republic; Convergence (economics); Geography; Economics; Economic growth","score_opus":0.045173202571408694,"score_gpt":0.38651919300346776,"score_spread":0.34134599043205904,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2027083919","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.67561114,0.020064129,0.00016432223,0.14174585,0.0060463874,0.0032347387,0.00025294477,0.00011850645,0.152762],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8184212,0.1591813,0.0011047169,0.013763414,0.0008473011,0.00024678317,0.00019040136,0.000052914766,0.006191995],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981972,0.00012008474,0.0006371949,0.0002519398,0.0005690276,0.00022457606],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99894184,0.00012768194,0.00034494212,0.00021727577,0.00031105016,0.000057229023],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013349496,0.00013760499,0.00024440888,0.00010408547,0.00017208692,0.00009315115,0.00044440915,0.000088097564,0.0030203764],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020640503,0.00010907184,0.00013626803,0.00023374546,0.0002128075,0.00046818337,0.00006562259,0.00030495663,0.000088829176],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000058238587,0.0009420205,0.33334035,0.001914896,0.00030836472,0.000014269066,0.024894442,0.000006519182,0.0013032183,0.013115493,0.039133,0.5849692],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030436864,0.000025062545,0.04906925,0.0021288763,0.000027938608,0.0000036054992,0.000089771485,0.000019648418,0.000054703785,0.0039498704,0.944162,0.0001648932],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037495315,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035455734,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.905029,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007038374,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000097060314,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.997891},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2032914253","doi":"10.1093/tandt/ttm100","title":"A need for greater understanding of civil law entities by common law jurisdictions","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Trusts & Trustees","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Common law; Civil law (Civil law); Political science; Convention; Parliament; Trust law; Ratification; Statutory law; Municipal law; Public law; Politics","score_opus":0.045703478445133006,"score_gpt":0.31733983811627103,"score_spread":0.27163635967113803,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2032914253","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22484224,0.00030973658,0.005486369,0.001789206,0.0010299297,0.00073564664,0.00012427504,0.00026507804,0.7654175],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99547386,0.000044279463,0.00011507984,0.00023988643,0.00024522538,0.000017621007,0.000017773378,0.000019708234,0.0038265677],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986226,0.000059078408,0.00035218438,0.00019702488,0.00034566512,0.00042347456],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992508,0.00024067893,0.00013869176,0.00016685456,0.00008256056,0.00012037344],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007856922,0.00013843732,0.00025001352,0.00009634914,0.0009636749,0.000098645054,0.00017197558,0.0001547536,0.00036166297],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000012854222,0.00013836923,0.00015077881,0.000168326,0.000639972,0.0003104992,0.000026958154,0.000099828205,0.0000058280657],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008249775,0.00006842317,0.002400813,0.000029797886,0.000051575196,0.0000011824075,0.019303644,0.000002731566,0.00039687438,0.9744107,0.002765047,0.00048668703],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00147828,0.00027304044,0.0014654772,0.00009391329,0.00016795116,0.0000025361703,0.03210436,0.000040021,0.004230584,0.045655303,0.9140845,0.00040401236],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010213371,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08889911,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9287554,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020246454,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004166606,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9963777},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W203387216","doi":"","title":"Complexity of Transnational Sources: Reports to the XVIIIth International Congress of Comparative Law: Complexity of Transnational Sources: Canada","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Comparative law; Law; Legal pluralism; International law; Municipal law; Legal culture; Sovereignty; Convention; Private law; Public law; Legal realism; Politics","score_opus":0.06387599090077564,"score_gpt":0.29929243021675184,"score_spread":0.2354164393159762,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W203387216","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97047657,0.0001677533,0.0044539613,0.010640014,0.00081047637,0.00036631778,0.00018762975,0.000011555448,0.012885746],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992626,0.000033098975,0.00019999918,0.00008981249,0.00012920376,0.0000054364027,0.000023330782,0.000007817064,0.00024874642],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968507,0.00025004102,0.0007903572,0.00018256437,0.0012825046,0.00064382056],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99802756,0.00011066595,0.00071954954,0.00013856111,0.00089246384,0.00011117326],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021806539,0.00014046405,0.00034126162,0.000103811515,0.00043108957,0.000020365536,0.00052181666,0.00006279923,0.0004558942],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000027275713,0.0001147154,0.00016397223,0.0002444946,0.0012082566,0.0001860147,0.000023303617,0.0005220796,1.9864413e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012242299,0.00014555795,0.003794364,0.000006635292,0.0002669908,0.00000141005,0.015595822,0.00017099889,0.00011242529,0.97953725,0.000089822664,0.00015632222],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019855953,0.000743981,0.08586714,0.000076637625,0.00021181397,0.00020989504,0.066311136,0.00041612575,0.004701654,0.7651115,0.07378756,0.0005769341],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2201097,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9367437,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.716634,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00050475384,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0045039435,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7989803},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2035879332","doi":"10.1017/s0008423904330106","title":"Shaping Nations: Constitutionalism and Society in Australia and Canada","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Mount Allison University","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Political science; Public administration; Law; Politics; Democracy","score_opus":0.0400795645033957,"score_gpt":0.3216511488129375,"score_spread":0.28157158430954177,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2035879332","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9835595,0.00007268412,0.000043334414,0.011840047,0.0002316063,0.000038260907,0.000006819988,0.0000011991814,0.0042065843],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991114,0.000010798596,0.00021445894,0.0005352027,0.000092684604,2.7135567e-7,8.3318064e-8,8.0209935e-7,0.000034273035],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991103,0.000014922191,0.00013606044,0.00007512193,0.0002596079,0.00040400052],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99867356,0.000051829233,0.000032030002,0.000023790888,0.00013862319,0.0010801575],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007523345,0.00003506061,0.00006225334,0.00010932061,0.0005863872,0.00010681492,0.00010132914,0.000028672097,0.000030424633],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005435983,0.00003410394,0.000013187645,0.0002574256,0.0018922936,0.0002911313,0.0000065336017,0.00010383175,2.6267392e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[1.9501783e-7,0.0000013526684,0.0076937373,0.0000013902567,9.0073286e-7,0.000015553842,0.000990814,0.0000064204396,0.000018701521,0.9911588,0.00003893091,0.000073236355],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003422652,0.000023375136,0.9406874,0.000101226215,0.0000065669037,0.00009400073,0.0043896553,0.00001652716,0.000040341438,0.031205084,0.022976955,0.00011661314],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99523675,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99793583,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95995367,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001137356,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014975291,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9906089},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2039856143","doi":"10.7202/043363ar","title":"Les difficultés de l'introduction du forum non conveniens en droit québécois","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Ministère des Transports; Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0061904801856654075,"score_gpt":0.24040413880298447,"score_spread":0.23421365861731908,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2039856143","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.88727194,0.0016060217,0.010734108,0.08270812,0.0017547028,0.000343105,0.000032219294,0.00017500122,0.015374801],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9200703,0.0019929605,0.000806666,0.0009004819,0.009277569,0.000030261031,0.00002752303,0.000046305744,0.066847965],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99735624,0.00026152245,0.0004103363,0.000516007,0.00042784188,0.0010280727],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99882823,0.00018122769,0.00020995457,0.00029290182,0.000120845325,0.00036685122],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009012723,0.00029196162,0.000342904,0.00012480628,0.0010572425,0.00014761009,0.00033903707,0.0008212311,0.0010120459],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018385838,0.00035918888,0.00030573513,0.0004011435,0.0010098877,0.0004341775,0.000041582716,0.00073419296,0.0002230614],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008525178,0.00035107954,0.006408612,0.000066422515,0.0001537573,0.000032741296,0.11606916,0.00070079014,0.0022520884,0.30704144,0.018269764,0.5485689],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005808466,0.00015304235,0.012656163,0.000047457528,0.00016789972,0.00006150731,0.015198452,0.0029409765,0.00091274857,0.0036387942,0.96320385,0.00043828043],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.065021366,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06983309,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94493407,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004535185,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002483469,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999012},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2040883501","doi":"10.7202/043831ar","title":"Le projet d’un code civil européen et la Constitution européenne","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Constitution; Art; Law","score_opus":0.012496212421012941,"score_gpt":0.2652909958345235,"score_spread":0.2527947834135105,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2040883501","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20954318,0.0020784363,0.00773466,0.035240144,0.00073868944,0.000311136,0.000071839226,0.00021003849,0.7440719],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9483356,0.0021921897,0.0010747575,0.0020454936,0.00087745494,0.000014650201,0.000022954464,0.000028810247,0.045408126],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975339,0.00080322655,0.00032204017,0.00038349952,0.00036941477,0.0005878749],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990466,0.00019890333,0.00016813181,0.00023042543,0.00010046155,0.00025547887],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014917223,0.00021567775,0.0002422567,0.000085761676,0.0008271224,0.00017977024,0.0002814667,0.00045071557,0.0005214116],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015927547,0.0002701637,0.00015954455,0.00042161602,0.0021418966,0.0004736519,0.00004604871,0.0006740655,0.0002912053],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023552655,0.00016722566,0.00044230607,0.000022937684,0.00004297772,0.000045638986,0.013371968,0.000080460995,0.0005052948,0.84190583,0.0017558069,0.14163601],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000579893,0.00007041855,0.0022583827,0.000072242394,0.000078236386,0.000063553154,0.0013671486,0.00054140156,0.0004944187,0.0062386566,0.98793054,0.00030510087],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019568354,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005208365,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98617476,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00047921736,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005445417,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999751},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2042926290","doi":"10.7202/042692ar","title":"Cabinet Action and the CRTC: An Examination of Section 23 of the Broadcasting Act","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Cabinet (room); Philosophy; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.016500125239373917,"score_gpt":0.2658498635612593,"score_spread":0.24934973832188537,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2042926290","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9858407,0.00062963116,0.0008607671,0.002615445,0.0006004121,0.00021170439,0.000006173955,0.000014704479,0.009220464],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9909418,0.0005037957,0.00009914641,0.00007956139,0.0006975932,0.000004898339,0.00000280599,0.000008142437,0.0076622562],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987231,0.0004786095,0.00023337037,0.00013534054,0.00026344863,0.00016615177],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99921334,0.00021207116,0.00030337702,0.00013957958,0.00008722153,0.00004440913],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013668039,0.00008528862,0.00013833054,0.00004371671,0.00046211545,0.000034104727,0.00012388628,0.00022598873,0.00004819276],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015214065,0.00006608884,0.00008026619,0.00030448372,0.0012127899,0.00033668862,0.000018222365,0.0002686199,9.590391e-7],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006303147,0.00006710115,0.0016669927,0.000056311845,0.000033722936,1.8904758e-7,0.07302761,0.00052860734,0.0032622176,0.051882155,0.00005043098,0.86936164],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0027939477,0.000387829,0.75507617,0.00029866953,0.0005183135,0.000047364243,0.03895642,0.044106398,0.010396438,0.006745632,0.1402644,0.00040838803],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0039370027,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0044506313,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8689532,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00035038817,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000051021292,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.59515965},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2043056765","doi":"10.7202/050494ar","title":"D'un entrepreneur à  un autre: l'accréditation ne suit pas","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Relations industrielles","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.028849901238712443,"score_gpt":0.2722235304039143,"score_spread":0.24337362916520183,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2043056765","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4560975,0.011366295,0.001877391,0.382402,0.0030846812,0.0006601078,0.000084931584,0.0002850993,0.14414197],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86336195,0.0023255919,0.00091328245,0.00041665498,0.0026099775,0.000022040074,0.00007008145,0.000026822514,0.13025363],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99772424,0.0003547711,0.0005445513,0.0003972543,0.0004990411,0.00048014673],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985744,0.00043668158,0.0002741965,0.00030658653,0.00017580103,0.00023236884],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.000555814,0.00023252696,0.00020641745,0.00015881979,0.0012779632,0.00015655582,0.00022181474,0.0007412249,0.010001759],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002730086,0.00027307236,0.0001577307,0.0011487915,0.0003578525,0.0007848021,0.00005794147,0.00061910984,0.0015808739],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008779923,0.00026795597,0.006905203,0.000001738453,0.00008469343,0.000005381109,0.0108125275,0.0017128921,0.000034319863,0.1412527,0.030978093,0.8079357],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00047932263,0.000051003517,0.013440489,0.000058147933,0.00015444282,0.0000046261334,0.0018929333,0.0014046752,0.0005068239,0.0028510834,0.9788739,0.00028255244],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012087345,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006031548,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9478958,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003142192,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00033831614,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99997216},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2048908424","doi":"10.7202/043109ar","title":"L'harmonisation du droit dans les transferts de fonds internationaux par télécommunications interbancaires","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Art","score_opus":0.015500558427110208,"score_gpt":0.26377479318932145,"score_spread":0.24827423476221125,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2048908424","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8009229,0.0020034062,0.079606526,0.04587428,0.00053306244,0.00027055806,0.000050343562,0.00017535497,0.07056361],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96914566,0.0041526817,0.00194643,0.0008459789,0.0008675279,0.000069185386,0.000057560064,0.000040447598,0.022874525],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978693,0.0003580802,0.00048631706,0.00033765438,0.00037978738,0.00056885864],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99876547,0.0002992681,0.00016254988,0.00038114554,0.00013582171,0.00025573745],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00082575134,0.00024314733,0.0002427583,0.00014714255,0.0012324234,0.00019641865,0.00069739885,0.00051555206,0.0006190679],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013738751,0.00031801453,0.00027341093,0.00035209314,0.0012286855,0.0005867144,0.000044366217,0.0006429466,0.00007528739],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034494544,0.00027760674,0.009226476,0.00003011929,0.00012350264,0.0000073672004,0.17528157,0.00037004874,0.0011709062,0.45685533,0.0015674245,0.35505515],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008350869,0.00014175718,0.09312359,0.00023361543,0.00025144673,0.00003775333,0.012090474,0.017019743,0.0022752872,0.038686004,0.8346949,0.0006103074],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009844236,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021068968,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8331275,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036408054,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024593226,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999272},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2049289738","doi":"10.7202/042699ar","title":"L'effectivité des décisions de justice en droit international privé","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Section (typography); Statutory law; Conflict of laws; Law; Political science; International law; Economic Justice; Law and economics; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.010629454037191385,"score_gpt":0.2913040966234156,"score_spread":0.2806746425862242,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2049289738","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8340362,0.00008845675,0.0329194,0.002321113,0.0003012357,0.00013639146,0.000007818899,0.00013822166,0.13005121],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9824834,0.000277381,0.003593579,0.0005305424,0.0010823921,0.000019487123,0.000005375939,0.0000139502945,0.011993898],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988929,0.00013636037,0.0001365581,0.00018359654,0.0002966516,0.00035391576],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99918765,0.0003991684,0.000054673095,0.00011992039,0.00006277912,0.00017580994],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00088174694,0.00008859724,0.00010255968,0.00009289721,0.00065140025,0.00010780141,0.00028746895,0.00020666786,0.00035749792],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005924086,0.00010401813,0.00009239501,0.00015458363,0.00034537402,0.0002613817,0.000028885088,0.00028454047,0.00007165655],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000050003226,0.00015841496,0.010407804,0.00001791456,0.00007624727,0.000023114146,0.06282804,0.000338984,0.0019231024,0.40567142,0.0012752366,0.51722974],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00055697473,0.00006528632,0.069258034,0.000053862776,0.00012617517,0.00002434054,0.0045316485,0.0018798076,0.00069941505,0.046450667,0.8760361,0.0003176994],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011193306,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033536856,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87476087,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00169387,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013008628,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.501011},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2051603156","doi":"10.1017/s0020589313000481","title":"<i>RE FLIGHTLEASE</i>: THE ‘REAL AND SUBSTANTIAL CONNECTION’ TEST FOR RECOGNITION AND ENFORCEMENT OF FOREIGN JUDGMENTS FAILS TO TAKE FLIGHT IN IRELAND","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International and Comparative Law Quarterly","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Trinity College","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Irish; Law; Enforcement; Political science; Test (biology); Common law; Linguistics","score_opus":0.05449964257874465,"score_gpt":0.3126494242527124,"score_spread":0.25814978167396774,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2051603156","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93927675,0.00002783505,0.0007473742,0.0014744732,0.00015750439,0.000438318,0.000070500486,0.000009333962,0.05779791],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993912,0.00002487647,0.00005943722,0.00017019718,0.00014178109,0.000054140328,0.00002448741,0.0000023671705,0.00013152687],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99934435,0.0000535823,0.00018695564,0.00015041672,0.00016326967,0.00010139838],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99940974,0.00030649832,0.00007534539,0.000036964375,0.00011837502,0.00005310093],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002746662,0.000074473326,0.00012174309,0.000041376326,0.00020678036,0.00010082246,0.000058357058,0.00003263762,0.000051304763],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000010989371,0.000057851146,0.000020112378,0.000050123304,0.0001434262,0.00019801223,0.000008892966,0.000039372713,0.0000017130052],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00031842978,0.00011491499,0.008267305,0.000014713121,0.000056389363,4.965682e-7,0.046336696,0.000004084256,0.0007762884,0.92367387,0.000271255,0.020165559],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.010046752,0.00738373,0.10042128,0.00041495223,0.00014293668,0.0000089652485,0.1098721,0.0076063233,0.0046759713,0.26132137,0.49710748,0.0009981415],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032793104,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022976581,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6623525,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001883103,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000010532767,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9948515},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W20592825","doi":"","title":"COMMENTI ALLA GIURISPRUDENZA - Sull'inimpugnabilità dell'ordinanza presidenziale in tema di sostituzione di arbitro","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Rassegna di diritto civile","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.031706117231919684,"score_gpt":0.29634892530314166,"score_spread":0.264642808071222,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W20592825","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.85617965,0.0043393103,0.00045708325,0.0072909826,0.0012703012,0.0016502981,0.00008633649,0.0005041557,0.1282219],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98900944,0.0015063704,0.000079688805,0.00034773446,0.00079201185,0.00016335677,0.00003057184,0.000054771714,0.008016082],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9958531,0.0005247736,0.00079629454,0.00076229946,0.000946004,0.001117531],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978738,0.00061617827,0.0002515257,0.00066316634,0.00019316103,0.00040216974],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012736256,0.00038765365,0.00060583046,0.00024985778,0.0009039295,0.00035946467,0.0006735068,0.00034737133,0.0023308364],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005207959,0.00041569513,0.00026908232,0.0006504889,0.00044221344,0.0007462559,0.00021778877,0.00044653163,0.00030532945],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018450533,0.0046015433,0.7086671,0.00037385436,0.00025625873,0.0003248464,0.040915918,0.0002158833,0.0034898592,0.03502655,0.16931553,0.036628164],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016416764,0.00019632121,0.10136805,0.00023092648,0.000074228046,0.0000066777648,0.0012988384,0.0010584191,0.0005627443,0.0015365279,0.8912222,0.00080342323],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01244797,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.037939224,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.72190666,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004651068,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013907725,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998295},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2061027942","doi":"10.7202/1023204ar","title":"La parenté et les traités / Kinship and Treaties","year":2013,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Kinship; Sociology; Anthropology","score_opus":0.02843450506027186,"score_gpt":0.27790625742558295,"score_spread":0.24947175236531108,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2061027942","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7780542,0.004500269,0.00005347096,0.017557597,0.000283532,0.00020891211,0.000019298841,0.0000566262,0.19926614],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94795674,0.0052064448,0.00019306292,0.00020768367,0.00052582397,0.00003903912,0.000008023141,0.000018391347,0.04584482],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986391,0.00037024968,0.00021621735,0.00024275115,0.000152096,0.00037959102],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99922776,0.00028666414,0.00009406446,0.00013869832,0.000051134553,0.00020165484],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00050878344,0.0001216863,0.0002220161,0.000053522348,0.00027448763,0.00022756757,0.00013129225,0.00030925174,0.00100514],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000072665425,0.00017433766,0.000100787875,0.00017329458,0.0004622375,0.00037745037,0.000033032076,0.00026989367,0.00012918707],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008537924,0.0001255093,0.040406886,0.00019543429,0.00004948253,0.000020338568,0.040318552,0.000011125352,0.00013971186,0.4179361,0.0022502788,0.49853805],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004555335,0.00015235547,0.3748288,0.0003659623,0.000109285604,0.000063942454,0.007757087,0.00039422492,0.00004241616,0.09366567,0.52175844,0.00040630525],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011963598,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029119395,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5195081,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000105915,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006539362,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999081},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2062031903","doi":"10.1093/ejil/chr072","title":"General Principles and Comparative Law","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of International Law","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Scholarship; Political science; Comparative law; Relevance (law); International law; Legal research; Representativeness heuristic; Philosophy of law; Sociology; Law and economics; Psychology","score_opus":0.12568925113219045,"score_gpt":0.3191628386966847,"score_spread":0.19347358756449426,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2062031903","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1765296,0.000078778314,0.000164077,0.0005169848,0.00052508165,0.000022592048,0.000002241251,0.0000076292226,0.82215303],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99460727,0.00008716785,0.0017362183,0.00036916815,0.0006947632,1.3855285e-7,6.4789526e-7,0.0000040633367,0.002500537],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991839,0.00020247887,0.00022950895,0.000059468723,0.00024832567,0.00007632162],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999432,0.000025036663,0.00019417869,0.00003523654,0.00022823943,0.000085277716],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007532585,0.000048765385,0.00007946743,0.000034595534,0.00016268287,0.00006404229,0.00019599251,0.000010108321,0.0003189921],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000014854806,0.00004148799,0.000046670673,0.000025823228,0.000247307,0.00027853568,0.000035087658,0.00009516038,0.000019906714],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003319952,0.0000292901,0.00064482715,4.906109e-7,0.000036757596,0.000038427374,0.009073557,0.0000025336624,0.00011385235,0.98924345,0.00017679611,0.00060684944],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026926858,0.00009707273,0.016023869,0.000022315984,0.000008866537,0.000028585615,0.0005625447,0.0000146345565,0.00025476658,0.0012199456,0.98144,0.00005814597],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00029871994,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004361379,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98802346,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000025943575,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000020081632,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34927395},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2066178597","doi":"10.1093/nq/51.2.184","title":"Review: The Beginnings of English Law","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Notes and Queries","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"English law; Classics; History; Media studies; Law; Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.016568394844404543,"score_gpt":0.2911095621237957,"score_spread":0.27454116727939115,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2066178597","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.34898567,0.16780181,0.00016351575,0.12659067,0.001315662,0.00075738557,0.000017318911,0.00020139468,0.3541666],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9667568,0.030594526,0.00006742959,0.0022303564,0.0002443364,0.0000044054286,8.090562e-7,0.000002470438,0.00009887485],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997026,0.000019052828,0.00007189128,0.000050905506,0.000085072155,0.000070527225],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997286,0.000058128306,0.000037022244,0.000056654804,0.00009917602,0.00002036971],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00023816284,0.00003125439,0.000069000664,0.0000049635546,0.00027107293,0.000019998155,0.000044820852,0.000022556727,0.000029098848],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023894511,0.000020727424,0.000024378647,0.000059602786,0.00047308428,0.00008964949,0.000013743488,0.000036020276,8.73671e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000033768588,0.000008965974,0.0005018351,0.0000639778,0.0000056211593,2.221649e-7,0.044047147,7.6716145e-7,0.000027599099,0.94534206,0.00088006555,0.00911833],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000048587524,0.000020299929,0.0005021548,0.00014726057,0.000008740982,1.14225166e-7,0.0009287133,8.214421e-8,0.00016970669,0.0027023633,0.9954425,0.000029490646],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008317479,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027609596,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99456245,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000005855503,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000022901333,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99828625},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W206675118","doi":"","title":"Federation of law societies of Canada v Canada (attorney general)","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"UWE Research Repository (UWE Bristol)","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.03423450943527855,"score_gpt":0.31483914850243433,"score_spread":0.28060463906715577,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W206675118","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.705134,0.0005891392,0.000010519149,0.0027182898,0.0005616325,0.0003926598,0.000011623095,0.00001727389,0.2905649],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9767556,0.00006771488,0.000054927586,0.000076675395,0.0003506916,0.00002963388,0.0000052821065,0.000011503693,0.022647973],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964963,0.0005153776,0.00039987545,0.00022922127,0.0018874365,0.00047178107],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978285,0.00024328896,0.00016664877,0.00026890205,0.0012514021,0.0002412685],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009450432,0.0000983859,0.00022204411,0.000054529373,0.0013610444,0.00011329124,0.000307414,0.000100521574,0.00011520902],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016094572,0.00010131754,0.0000606361,0.00024191679,0.0005411751,0.00022765632,0.000058417103,0.00023345469,0.0000015577484],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005171783,0.00015414035,0.008535272,0.00027076775,0.00014875039,0.000040334362,0.008844532,0.00013027969,0.050163094,0.12925653,0.79756665,0.0048379423],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002611184,0.00010639012,0.016857143,0.00007305316,0.000012010738,0.0000029711262,0.0068480563,0.0003990388,0.039763812,0.00067393476,0.9347575,0.0002450274],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99990416,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9994516,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2716216,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012901876,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009778213,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999939},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2068102555","doi":"10.1177/0363199013484714","title":"Ireland and the Divorce and Matrimonial Causes Act of 1857","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Family History","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":55,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"British Academy","keywords":"Irish; Parliament; Law; Political science; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.022311094138322773,"score_gpt":0.26062171628748015,"score_spread":0.23831062214915738,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2068102555","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97163993,0.01244565,0.0000121611365,0.0011944468,0.0005245191,0.00007479992,4.9015773e-7,0.0000037076004,0.014104314],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9952163,0.0030908315,0.000048482434,0.00016568457,0.00025715138,7.8540296e-7,3.928874e-8,0.000003346073,0.00121735],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993329,0.00010587349,0.00020697179,0.000044907993,0.0002299987,0.000079326135],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993411,0.00016145181,0.00026711304,0.00004835702,0.000114073715,0.00006791383],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006162444,0.00004554638,0.00015299169,0.000052616087,0.00014161057,0.000019920108,0.00008059774,0.000044777964,0.000050024573],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000077470286,0.000029477287,0.000049462302,0.000031639633,0.00058813085,0.00020052341,0.000016303984,0.0001112109,0.0000015857029],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0016862683,0.00032611837,0.13021153,0.00017265423,0.0004948673,0.000050850722,0.34444228,0.000009014898,0.022280056,0.041808747,0.2915934,0.16692422],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012528454,0.00013976771,0.22122471,0.000037805545,0.000066524495,0.000013549901,0.0028680013,0.000012040361,0.00001156509,0.0006185511,0.77368397,0.00007067757],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004196811,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00021507552,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.48209056,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008275655,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001429197,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.63443506},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2068997246","doi":"10.2202/1535-1661.1039","title":"North America as a Medieval Legal Construction","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Jurist Advances","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Legal history; Law; Core (optical fiber); History; Public administration; Engineering","score_opus":0.009992982864664449,"score_gpt":0.2861688978961509,"score_spread":0.2761759150314865,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2068997246","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19508792,0.0036319024,0.0003606343,0.004649717,0.0022201652,0.00022367397,0.000057514993,0.00032106496,0.7934474],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9907095,0.0045672436,0.0010339181,0.00049828045,0.001130485,0.000013755167,0.000010782304,0.000006980961,0.0020290539],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986231,0.000077915145,0.0001934162,0.0002550905,0.00050232967,0.00034817844],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994562,0.000030476413,0.000118356336,0.00012649878,0.00009376014,0.0001747102],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00008604486,0.000120388606,0.00015552284,0.000027002792,0.0006098505,0.00010697137,0.00018215695,0.0000597148,0.0011644985],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000097310374,0.000120394194,0.00008116355,0.00044809296,0.00062150514,0.00059867767,0.000026390198,0.000091503556,0.00048730953],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000047147852,0.00010238588,0.024117313,0.000009985592,0.000028245317,0.000034750057,0.0027135864,0.000028136225,0.0000041548715,0.052022077,0.005833728,0.9150585],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018110221,0.00007324817,0.0027646758,0.0000073106953,0.000016296312,0.000011533076,0.001571716,0.000028941258,0.000003873498,0.0013221465,0.99387175,0.00014743368],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029424196,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008270015,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.988038,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015728436,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000060722527,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997486},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2073539553","doi":"10.5430/wjel.v5n1p14","title":"Mutual Determination between Clausal Constituents","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Journal of English Language","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.03205743483887837,"score_gpt":0.3313195534517456,"score_spread":0.2992621186128672,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2073539553","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7794692,0.00043307187,0.00020405622,0.00034936983,0.0025436382,0.0000845783,0.000005977158,0.000039864313,0.21687023],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9926818,0.000013438111,0.00039653474,0.00006430644,0.0048300168,5.4901284e-7,0.0000025880668,0.000006298473,0.002004495],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988403,0.00013423513,0.00027971837,0.00006798299,0.0005088452,0.00016891865],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987224,0.00010580855,0.00024292985,0.000070229915,0.0006192958,0.00023938307],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012284183,0.000065870416,0.00015456103,0.00019713782,0.00010998715,0.000079191464,0.00017818947,0.00005134309,0.00014083763],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013904087,0.00006085419,0.0000729173,0.00024001852,0.00011647523,0.0004132903,0.00002015551,0.00019362122,0.000013441212],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016548131,0.00019291323,0.09260868,0.0000150680335,0.00011665578,0.00033643286,0.6174681,0.000016375152,0.00023014391,0.0142554045,0.027351849,0.2472429],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009294971,0.000079711106,0.0039593233,0.000051582774,0.000051742045,0.0000031200116,0.023150323,0.000004298192,0.0002126696,0.00018322298,0.9712559,0.00011861119],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00018598164,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001101172,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94390404,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012786647,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021375428,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24815618},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2079812163","doi":"10.7202/042612ar","title":"L'action d'intérêt collectif","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Collective action; Action (physics); Interest group; Order (exchange); Public interest; Law and economics; Value (mathematics); Political science; Special Interest Group; Epistemology; Sociology; Law; Business; Philosophy; Politics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.01617772241720579,"score_gpt":0.28467555323283517,"score_spread":0.2684978308156294,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2079812163","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.75414616,0.00007719353,0.0034632613,0.003025161,0.0002797479,0.00012210527,0.0000019291042,0.00016554528,0.23871891],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94106907,0.00017197635,0.0005401504,0.0005312674,0.0008255804,0.000010976421,0.0000022661825,0.000008662772,0.05684006],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99925697,0.0000617581,0.000100777375,0.00012850683,0.00019897644,0.00025299483],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996578,0.00005713589,0.000043627508,0.000089475645,0.00004031715,0.0001116097],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003759601,0.00005857568,0.0000763229,0.000064915046,0.00067978795,0.00007081356,0.000098551485,0.0001761079,0.00053591887],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008324704,0.00006891497,0.00006141664,0.00022578936,0.00018796847,0.00015905983,0.0000062322943,0.00019103162,0.00009609501],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005901568,0.00010691125,0.0037125088,0.000010438971,0.00004524083,0.000008635251,0.057721116,0.00010359367,0.0017811416,0.25639132,0.017154489,0.6629056],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016002542,0.000022852419,0.0049661845,0.0000049062846,0.000012479802,0.0000028031545,0.0023957947,0.00014421123,0.00051770644,0.00370773,0.98796517,0.000100112156],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018667827,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0064550177,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9708107,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010655585,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009368139,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.58679354},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2081632868","doi":"10.7202/1013028ar","title":"Legal Hybridity in Hong Kong and Macau","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Hybridity; Mainland China; China; Political science; Ideology; Acknowledgement; Politics; Law; Sociology; Anthropology","score_opus":0.0273633526495178,"score_gpt":0.30415470072908285,"score_spread":0.27679134807956507,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2081632868","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5354382,0.00030955224,0.000012202192,0.0010052288,0.0006851581,0.000049021695,0.0000036130664,0.000016140759,0.4624809],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99861944,0.00024613665,0.0000778884,0.00010265354,0.0007756972,7.9085646e-7,2.3245042e-7,0.0000048119487,0.00017233017],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991384,0.00011818702,0.0001406179,0.00006720242,0.0002263392,0.00030926452],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99962854,0.000035577035,0.000057763937,0.000042814758,0.000030750634,0.00020453658],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011357748,0.00005523365,0.000087194094,0.000040603318,0.0019544244,0.00010358294,0.00006882453,0.00004719348,0.00021006311],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000352905,0.000051285464,0.00003432027,0.00008048337,0.000104417275,0.0007033519,0.00002424212,0.00023182102,0.000011428028],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017847799,0.00008339003,0.085757926,0.000004046289,0.000011795654,0.000035309662,0.002306326,0.0000022694887,0.000074738535,0.86463237,0.00028216222,0.046791844],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020135188,0.000013250405,0.047526333,0.000014477236,0.0000055021765,0.00006032255,0.0006136358,0.000004992054,0.0000676474,0.00040537975,0.9510138,0.00007328337],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0066717886,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020199038,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95073164,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008386125,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000075438065,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999429},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2090573100","doi":"10.1287/ited.1080.0016tn","title":"<b>Teaching Note</b>—Bidding on Priceline","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"INFORMS Transactions on Education","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Bidding; Case teaching; Computer science; Teaching method; Mathematics education; Business; Marketing; Psychology","score_opus":0.025943531337462022,"score_gpt":0.3369896970146339,"score_spread":0.31104616567717186,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2090573100","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.39771187,0.00003087092,0.075738795,0.010624933,0.0041425526,0.0006377603,0.000009094949,0.00049406936,0.51061004],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.986084,0.00013433864,0.0006338597,0.00090371456,0.00046857953,0.000041150524,0.0000092175915,0.000010719766,0.011714409],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99907035,0.00003549326,0.00020771654,0.00014341144,0.0003418187,0.00020124293],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99947774,0.00008685333,0.00007661084,0.0001613382,0.000085268824,0.000112203066],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003108176,0.00009754955,0.00008356746,0.0002203861,0.0016621237,0.00004672121,0.0001103591,0.000099780445,0.00032519293],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003908673,0.00009383781,0.00007770994,0.00023032635,0.000073500574,0.00051151053,8.64135e-7,0.00029508656,0.00022893769],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000040934483,0.0005354344,0.000073884396,0.0000074286495,0.000010840019,5.0317846e-7,0.04739489,0.00063571753,0.00009584345,0.013793692,0.00067348144,0.93673736],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026065527,0.00016486368,0.0043505994,0.000058946145,0.000016906608,0.0000066429157,0.0049957805,0.00028020126,0.0004932201,0.0004234326,0.9887135,0.00023523162],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003199988,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004703636,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98804003,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00028018592,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00041836654,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996376},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2091946373","doi":"10.1093/iclq/lei083","title":"The Enforcement of Jurisdiction Agreements Within The Brussels Regime","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International and Comparative Law Quarterly","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":169,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trinity College","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Damages; Context (archaeology); Enforcement; Political science; Subject (documents); Law; Exclusive jurisdiction; Law and economics; Sociology; Geography; Computer science","score_opus":0.026511773848800275,"score_gpt":0.3078520052260265,"score_spread":0.28134023137722625,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2091946373","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5159933,0.00020243302,0.0004943388,0.006315762,0.0009593448,0.00031065365,0.000013957542,0.000027703165,0.4756825],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9949402,0.00001482655,0.000017646656,0.00009408588,0.00027338017,0.000019525052,0.0000070900187,0.0000017050762,0.004631547],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99908566,0.00009761425,0.00023480773,0.00010139884,0.00038286622,0.000097669],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99945664,0.0001213651,0.00017125194,0.000078082885,0.00015058658,0.000022058754],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00036939318,0.00006524921,0.00007549955,0.000016422156,0.0006753606,0.00012630215,0.00018417444,0.000023957518,0.00006234679],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000019513368,0.000038537702,0.00004060901,0.000059685564,0.00039773807,0.00015792336,0.000011226071,0.000062945874,0.000008511566],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032650118,0.000029936231,0.0003277343,6.402286e-7,0.000035428995,2.2924385e-7,0.012731026,0.000010846201,0.000111001136,0.9843721,0.00071939075,0.0016290137],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00047011583,0.00028427382,0.011499581,0.000024548417,0.000021585312,0.0000018909685,0.014478519,0.0007866415,0.0005603086,0.094045445,0.87771046,0.000116638366],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014254525,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015918083,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8903267,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000033665114,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000025289575,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99230963},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2094742225","doi":"10.1002/iir.81","title":"Insolvency proceedings and commercial arbitration. Vezna Lazic* (1998) (The Hague‐London‐Boston, Kluwer Law International), XIII &amp; 381 pages","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Insolvency Review","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Insolvency; Arbitration; Law; Political science; Citation; Library science; Computer science","score_opus":0.04786257025933938,"score_gpt":0.3469022313133048,"score_spread":0.2990396610539654,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2094742225","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.048677076,0.059342258,0.0003032989,0.15237626,0.0056844223,0.0019952976,0.000067368725,0.00035693857,0.73119706],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.61093897,0.35355908,0.00039899527,0.023869293,0.0030851539,0.00030706523,0.00014306245,0.00005076019,0.0076476363],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974177,0.00010869669,0.00070549466,0.00044316906,0.0009873118,0.00033765205],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985087,0.0001540283,0.00037374106,0.00021046824,0.0005996946,0.0001534048],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012889005,0.00025987072,0.00032648275,0.00011315968,0.0007806811,0.0003678172,0.0008471183,0.00013736181,0.0011665656],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00041121492,0.00021669411,0.00020706258,0.0003738115,0.00043876134,0.0010009453,0.00015974222,0.00037319775,0.00027080797],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000088033215,0.00058619515,0.028226985,0.0002926786,0.00036253728,0.000022296845,0.010143086,0.0000023555078,0.00026490292,0.74455094,0.101391286,0.11406872],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029402148,0.000034461,0.0073066447,0.00082443666,0.00006173318,0.000030335968,0.00015277757,0.000024294133,0.000007831303,0.0027788125,0.9882387,0.00024595842],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013140283,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005692313,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88684744,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019144127,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011047532,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997465},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2094934984","doi":"10.7202/1027255ar","title":"International Child Abduction in the European Union: the Solutions Incorporated by the Council Regulation","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Convention; European union; Political science; Law; International law; Restitution; Relation (database); International trade; Economics","score_opus":0.028052473433725633,"score_gpt":0.23924357885845965,"score_spread":0.21119110542473402,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2094934984","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07911274,0.000095382966,0.004758068,0.1407986,0.0008346215,0.0004251503,0.000010678462,0.00008587709,0.7738789],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99610394,0.00011912487,0.000016164067,0.0004404643,0.0013188589,0.000016413956,0.000030240964,0.0000076312635,0.0019471524],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978974,0.001215575,0.00017550078,0.00013530972,0.00039690387,0.0001793224],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999359,0.00012167014,0.00012538573,0.00022835268,0.00013898476,0.0000265952],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0072305645,0.000054078402,0.00005699558,0.000024537858,0.0009987416,0.00014954379,0.00042238785,0.000046770183,0.00006087647],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002228183,0.000042096493,0.00004790054,0.00033993108,0.00019288133,0.00016506985,0.000030281151,0.00020867132,0.000039184713],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031952288,0.00026838278,0.007534529,0.000013084083,0.00005932982,0.0000045836136,0.10996672,0.0025505368,0.0009232329,0.64177,0.054763194,0.18211445],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016985055,0.000015929767,0.06234158,0.00002384169,0.000013675288,0.000017139248,0.0015748605,0.0023409661,0.000004961599,0.014317167,0.91910285,0.000077176745],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019801925,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0044838204,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91699123,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00042560356,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008677845,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7681614},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W21149149","doi":"10.1017/cbo9781139031288.005","title":"Conceptual issues in choice of law","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Thompson Rivers University","funders":"","keywords":"Content (measure theory); Choice of law; Computer science; Law; Law and economics; Political science; Sociology; Mathematics; Conflict of laws; Mathematical analysis","score_opus":0.044051333050067205,"score_gpt":0.2661679371781535,"score_spread":0.22211660412808631,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W21149149","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0010628199,0.00021954915,0.000005656798,0.00006105272,0.00022085955,0.00033656158,0.00006065262,0.00005286603,0.99798],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.016770866,0.00026839948,0.00001933089,0.000044161217,0.00022550032,4.4970722e-7,0.000010558264,0.000014658873,0.98264605],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99900866,0.00006203407,0.00016923856,0.00025353165,0.00029873283,0.00020779556],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99922377,0.0000975226,0.00018627956,0.00022123996,0.00016481995,0.00010636533],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00012725696,0.00016404224,0.00031827626,0.000102615355,0.0001700612,0.000025695274,0.00034473793,0.0003591115,0.000074611184],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000012051047,0.00020607378,0.00012032166,0.0000075757,0.001087088,0.00013501736,0.00012284935,0.00026027294,0.000017737279],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013469853,0.0000069957787,0.00000840154,0.000013367365,0.00002603482,0.000016132613,0.0018410273,3.8533932e-7,0.00001532337,0.98876774,0.008676273,0.00061482395],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029958418,0.000029581268,0.000052737912,0.000110709356,0.000040506155,2.0259606e-7,0.0003962048,0.0000022497118,0.000066342196,0.000032749605,0.99877226,0.00019688347],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05627771,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011724246,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.990096,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015048347,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000106161024,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9500066},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2121178016","doi":"10.3968/j.css.1923669720130906.2986","title":"Comparative Research on China and Taiwan’s Legal Systems: From the View of the Agent Right of Daily Household Matters","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian social science","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; China; Wife; Legislation; Mainland China; Political science; Civil code; Government (linguistics); Marriage law; Property rights; Sociology","score_opus":0.07201075717983392,"score_gpt":0.3379202921230119,"score_spread":0.265909534943178,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2121178016","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.87187225,0.00018307687,0.0000014949138,0.019868175,0.0004122619,0.0005514918,0.000071822076,0.000006169786,0.10703326],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999012,0.000017902694,0.0000024490098,0.00044131352,0.00014810226,0.000014312994,4.2906902e-7,0.0000027484211,0.00036072102],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99821055,0.00034985418,0.00014896055,0.00017662432,0.0007718653,0.00034213066],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992631,0.0001159582,0.00008997552,0.00016275296,0.0001747276,0.00019349932],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014650283,0.00005945378,0.00013521398,0.00006348977,0.0021085879,0.00020182168,0.0006480312,0.000045333927,0.000083180654],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000050067407,0.000036537444,0.000034543107,0.000771561,0.0035834867,0.00020531677,0.000051635318,0.00016076135,0.0000075418475],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011049042,0.000056044133,0.0186239,0.000026678585,0.000040046823,0.000003175111,0.2777064,0.000013365851,0.0027613963,0.59914064,0.094758525,0.0068587493],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013447576,0.00004431381,0.45538968,0.00010444445,0.000010312709,3.0015605e-7,0.053569075,0.00004543538,0.00020735856,0.0006873471,0.4896833,0.0001239721],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7348463,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.25704274,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5984533,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003201586,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00092554314,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991905},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2125352624","doi":"10.5539/jpl.v5n1p145","title":"Discriminatory or Non-Discriminatory Application of Jus Sanguinis","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Politics and Law","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nationality; Political science; Immigration; Law","score_opus":0.026210788848680285,"score_gpt":0.33377112610367005,"score_spread":0.30756033725498977,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2125352624","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9036057,0.0010807711,0.0005931321,0.00126151,0.00074671226,0.00012294229,0.000013166168,0.0000069992543,0.09256909],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99840057,0.00016022052,0.00017880526,0.00021008373,0.00067764026,0.0000010438981,5.130988e-7,0.0000057020306,0.00036544877],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99919885,0.00004555057,0.0002694042,0.00004400627,0.0002458095,0.00019638274],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992601,0.00006977915,0.00024925536,0.00007110012,0.00014528111,0.00020447702],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00060495024,0.00005637211,0.00014686714,0.000052767078,0.00017791984,0.000019494744,0.00008656923,0.00006362912,0.000040809493],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000041508858,0.00004307621,0.00006217531,0.000051860865,0.0002675166,0.00022558043,0.000017469703,0.00009120875,0.0000014034467],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015714291,0.000116476,0.0026683554,0.0000414832,0.000019370738,0.0000016287789,0.01770543,1.987789e-7,0.0004906239,0.9730899,0.00048098763,0.005369848],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00047538395,0.00023397406,0.041581817,0.00006457502,0.00017052982,0.0000234112,0.013257344,0.000017283197,0.0015377242,0.0074298903,0.9350535,0.00015454023],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014700223,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002428285,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96566,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000044726537,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009123442,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22222438},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2129425672","doi":"10.2307/4053780","title":"Christopher W. Brooks. Lawyers, Litigation and English Society since 1450. Rio Grande, Ohio: The Hambledon Press. 1998. Pp. x, 274. $55.00. ISBN 1-85285-156-2.","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Albion A Quarterly Journal Concerned with British Studies","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"History; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.01831498222541291,"score_gpt":0.2689766822779606,"score_spread":0.25066170005254773,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2129425672","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8702026,0.08563224,0.00012349684,0.008621138,0.0013537685,0.0011276626,0.00004947179,0.0003122726,0.032577362],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9336799,0.056742486,0.00015681436,0.0008656349,0.0018100621,0.00004603759,0.000008109551,0.000035581797,0.006655376],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971654,0.00037888257,0.0005508513,0.00045680293,0.00084436015,0.0006037179],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984226,0.000257383,0.00035936228,0.00019406126,0.00053116214,0.0002354169],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00105735,0.00029916305,0.0004549606,0.000023714367,0.0031250294,0.001174938,0.00029167574,0.0001695497,0.00017998122],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000052825708,0.00024812398,0.0002133869,0.0002583306,0.0013674636,0.0009920875,0.000026836111,0.0005503319,0.00001842221],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004647635,0.00022577727,0.0037574482,0.000101714584,0.0012368499,0.00015276896,0.42982414,0.000025873205,0.00008102966,0.001582148,0.17566457,0.3868829],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0024625333,0.0007208833,0.0055186725,0.0005311985,0.00019971111,0.0001913456,0.04647509,0.000074873686,0.000017050324,0.00088343356,0.9424286,0.00049661804],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007405332,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011213012,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.76676404,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018825874,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013801934,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999971},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2131219729","doi":"10.5539/jpl.v5n1p82","title":"The European Rules on the Choice of Forum by Individuals: An Elaboration of Law Cases","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Politics and Law","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Autonomy; Scope (computer science); Settlement (finance); Action (physics); Law; Choice of law; Political science; Set (abstract data type); European union; Elaboration; Law and economics; Conflict of laws; Business; Sociology; Computer science; International trade","score_opus":0.03962476825540101,"score_gpt":0.3331868222958622,"score_spread":0.2935620540404612,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2131219729","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92386115,0.00067583256,0.000007652192,0.0036971937,0.00017490164,0.00004870291,0.00003743896,0.0000022051852,0.071494915],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989272,0.00021351042,0.000015217405,0.0003605112,0.00039153642,1.9251951e-7,8.438865e-7,0.0000038204007,0.000087212116],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99908006,0.00029225796,0.00022267076,0.00002647332,0.00024007604,0.00013843933],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99903995,0.0003905547,0.0002885111,0.00006605947,0.0001415413,0.00007339438],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014845527,0.00004021303,0.00007797312,0.000013596713,0.0004283958,0.000056151213,0.00010769891,0.000023907638,0.000007898808],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011367426,0.000022023378,0.000033538403,0.00003398279,0.00031837996,0.00020768175,0.000012995987,0.0000790923,4.554029e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000027656552,0.000048637976,0.0015518448,0.0000022442825,0.000014125486,2.1483208e-7,0.0033463011,2.9576123e-7,0.00020243585,0.9932796,0.0006378259,0.000913712],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013807823,0.0002525691,0.008527193,0.00002881006,0.00003586179,0.0000035059486,0.0049782926,0.000002393239,0.0011451474,0.00534193,0.97950286,0.000043343178],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024455758,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000905693,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9879377,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000011505773,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000026541373,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36969954},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2135966506","doi":"10.1093/oxfordjournals.cjilaw.a000494","title":"Foreign Sovereign Immunities, Acta Jure Imperil and Acta Jure Gestionis: A Recent Exposition from the Canadian Supreme Court","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Chinese Journal of International Law","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Exposition (narrative); Supreme court; Sovereignty; Political science; Law; Art; Politics","score_opus":0.016014454812775462,"score_gpt":0.2711608097080887,"score_spread":0.25514635489531323,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2135966506","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.68918526,0.0010599867,0.000048929905,0.03552785,0.0017705177,0.00019524008,0.00013693003,0.000017120263,0.27205813],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99589664,0.0015632714,0.00016375387,0.0010904191,0.0009028996,0.00000326785,0.00003122388,0.000011082596,0.00033745787],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99861276,0.00019016117,0.00032768102,0.0001068379,0.0005776783,0.00018487536],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99863666,0.00020116671,0.00026218235,0.00011137346,0.00059262937,0.00019598119],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00079912966,0.0001301234,0.0001554235,0.00007730605,0.0009385591,0.00040555643,0.00033585474,0.00011749226,0.0009806621],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00032630548,0.00008875605,0.000095805044,0.000111190435,0.00020231487,0.0005734206,0.000022446664,0.0003318651,0.0000028705472],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016622133,0.00009928423,0.016517427,0.000004050762,0.0003293075,0.000034192457,0.012502386,0.000022027398,0.0011835053,0.95856965,0.008627586,0.001944344],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00074897247,0.0000869832,0.033855923,0.000111607784,0.000049384736,0.00010452722,0.00305156,0.00005718252,0.00008171031,0.048645206,0.9130312,0.0001757488],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06817625,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.30506298,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90992445,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00041796605,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005914799,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999326},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2136784259","doi":"10.5539/jpl.v4n2p153","title":"A Comparative Study of Contract Formation and Breach of Contract and Liability in China and Ohada (Note 1) Space Contract Laws","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Politics and Law","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Frustration of purpose; Severability; Breach of contract; China; Commercial law; Law; Exclusion clause; Business; Delict; Order (exchange); Civil law (Civil law); Privity of contract; Harmonization; Contract management; Private law; Liability; Legal liability; General partnership; Comparative law; Political science; Finance; Damages; Black letter law","score_opus":0.03148638514029677,"score_gpt":0.32725972629040456,"score_spread":0.2957733411501078,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2136784259","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9939819,0.00043707667,0.000023283816,0.00021268426,0.000047655692,0.00023836874,0.000013483168,0.0000019762456,0.005043561],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995691,0.00029040533,0.000053335385,0.000028968747,0.000041867057,7.3999473e-7,2.8210414e-7,0.0000027513292,0.000012538786],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989447,0.00017481245,0.00046222474,0.00008132743,0.00019101662,0.00014593577],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989613,0.00022981685,0.00045278334,0.000053382362,0.00017090746,0.00013178878],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010367411,0.00008503748,0.00040748634,0.000060193786,0.00012108665,0.000038507806,0.00004206475,0.000065613545,0.0000097228485],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006281149,0.00006931974,0.000027097933,0.00004864544,0.00035858268,0.00039703297,0.00001764024,0.0001569859,2.7166074e-8],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00048226415,0.0013176383,0.25545868,0.0001133252,0.00011945706,0.000016633372,0.39771023,0.0000018388749,0.0009742315,0.34062886,0.000011494805,0.0031653258],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0024119283,0.0010652858,0.9786698,0.00007731217,0.00007070758,0.000022133441,0.01139056,0.00030358724,0.00032615077,0.0039942646,0.0015765987,0.000091633636],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.031208107,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013085346,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.72321117,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000026552847,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000055585144,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97524315},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2137790678","doi":"10.1111/japp.12143","title":"Licensing Parents in International Contract Pregnancies","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Philosophy","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Convention; Law; Political science; Vetting; State (computer science); Business; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.05281687393416345,"score_gpt":0.318361155103381,"score_spread":0.2655442811692175,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2137790678","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.50612366,0.00020476388,0.00006011017,0.00644142,0.0015063236,0.000119488184,0.0000016705364,0.000014804861,0.48552775],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980084,0.000082494196,0.0002454486,0.00022681865,0.0013997243,0.0000010313181,6.561258e-7,0.000004951368,0.000030488369],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989697,0.000028571316,0.00030145,0.00006653505,0.0005080492,0.0001257168],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993113,0.00004486135,0.0002685859,0.000048917995,0.00019954721,0.00012675032],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00071013684,0.00005857023,0.00014029714,0.00013631866,0.000060317183,0.00005847004,0.00017814108,0.00005713151,0.000029841045],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007544535,0.00005383921,0.000051168296,0.00012632484,0.00006876844,0.00023855138,0.00001847302,0.00016229996,0.000010288103],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.002063654,0.0011238946,0.050533652,0.000022440392,0.0002470783,0.00020466003,0.18794861,0.0009863859,0.0019972834,0.6461587,0.0031887607,0.10552486],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005599428,0.00024955205,0.026568273,0.00040978834,0.000050674596,0.000027330378,0.0092618,0.00016061307,0.0004887879,0.24618213,0.7105782,0.00042343605],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000117636475,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008007908,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7073894,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014954765,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016983614,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21954992},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2144256418","doi":"10.2979/gls.2004.11.1.57","title":"Courts and Globalization","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Globalization; Political science; Law; Federalism; Politics; International law; Political economy; Sociology","score_opus":0.022804613988008548,"score_gpt":0.35212047943698704,"score_spread":0.3293158654489785,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2144256418","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94797176,0.015753536,0.00026833222,0.014648355,0.0010195503,0.00008856428,0.0000073440215,0.000018801948,0.020223748],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9956486,0.003480165,0.00016894525,0.00023485739,0.00042428516,3.687747e-7,1.346736e-7,0.0000020386192,0.000040600964],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99915713,0.000042203847,0.0002221848,0.00006746249,0.0003540149,0.00015700186],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993374,0.000020735199,0.00019146361,0.000033277633,0.00031181055,0.00010535948],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00041397114,0.00006720847,0.00016316865,0.000025889118,0.0003892787,0.00008093557,0.000084489606,0.00004609676,0.000007455994],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021669084,0.000057055837,0.00005155257,0.00015157748,0.00023283738,0.0003568823,0.00002435972,0.00006450351,0.0000032400258],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000089995076,0.00010992714,0.050486468,0.000020164924,0.00041188265,0.00025133148,0.016102487,0.00014338447,0.000016582248,0.89021605,0.0043957704,0.037755944],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014156525,0.00039339726,0.13900752,0.0001977165,0.00012671284,0.00015419007,0.010115952,7.729363e-7,0.0000266266,0.05063245,0.79770964,0.00021938048],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015224613,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027462733,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83958364,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00040025802,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020372265,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29940563},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2144422300","doi":"10.1002/iir.148","title":"Japanese comments on the extraterritorial effects of U.S. Chapter 15","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Insolvency Review","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Debtor; Jurisdiction; Bankruptcy; Law; Section (typography); Subject (documents); Law and economics; Political science; Economic Justice; Business; Sociology; Debt; Computer science; Creditor; Finance","score_opus":0.03185332480602369,"score_gpt":0.3565427070390647,"score_spread":0.324689382233041,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2144422300","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14092448,0.03651615,0.00013389735,0.04877171,0.022996634,0.002181893,0.000018487843,0.000099825134,0.74835694],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9777176,0.018315554,0.000013260695,0.0021939715,0.0010657556,0.000015348425,0.0000040370005,0.000005428722,0.0006690738],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99896914,0.000067302964,0.00026253378,0.000101929094,0.00048325525,0.00011587011],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992601,0.0003084225,0.00013869637,0.00011974102,0.00013058944,0.000042400447],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010393516,0.00006932679,0.000119392585,0.00003375233,0.00011291604,0.000018168297,0.00030407013,0.00003810721,0.0006878266],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00025913832,0.000048001166,0.0001004549,0.000078004865,0.00008568223,0.00008887561,0.000024306704,0.000088573164,0.00005921834],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009616794,0.0005794323,0.0020279093,0.0006089879,0.00020042795,0.00002703895,0.011143202,4.9627715e-7,0.0011601562,0.80625296,0.020019017,0.15788423],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012677176,0.00005208539,0.0018001767,0.0014178122,0.000015694124,6.4055973e-7,0.000059831094,0.0000013797988,0.0002844693,0.00045668383,0.99572366,0.00006077701],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006523627,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00018399615,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97570467,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000048782444,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000017422088,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.75312185},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2156799455","doi":"10.3968/j.css.1923669720110702.023","title":"Mandatory Rules of the Rome I Regulation: Not \"Old Wine in New Bottles\" RÈGLES IMPÉRATIVES DE RÈGLEMENT ROME I: PAS DE \"VIEUX VIN DANS DE NOUVELLES BOUTEILLES\"","year":2011,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian social science","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Convention; Autonomy; Political science; Law; Conflict of laws; Choice of law; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03199954188465159,"score_gpt":0.2686479849930979,"score_spread":0.2366484431084463,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2156799455","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91177166,0.00079573615,0.00016897816,0.014505621,0.00084195676,0.00046337198,0.0001443816,0.000022287775,0.071286],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9900932,0.00019302116,0.0006966367,0.0010413905,0.0006904843,0.000016877104,0.00000256922,0.00001530584,0.0072505362],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969499,0.00035324527,0.00044569222,0.00042363108,0.0006313946,0.0011961207],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99847364,0.00006559956,0.00026580624,0.0002599453,0.00013280695,0.0008022176],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00212597,0.00021968299,0.00027953702,0.00020226266,0.0016033918,0.000121240504,0.00102629,0.00024290223,0.00058324286],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016658139,0.0002153938,0.00015495406,0.001228712,0.003516767,0.0005042861,0.00011304549,0.00024437442,0.000010538904],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001852245,0.00008776412,0.11126567,0.000028891785,0.000024622128,0.000016430828,0.29245603,0.000012468429,0.0029677367,0.564326,0.0017728955,0.027022982],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002878408,0.00005454594,0.8447137,0.000112298694,0.000034773006,0.0000043601412,0.023369946,0.00010667068,0.0014424328,0.0059723714,0.123602904,0.00029819226],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.43311483,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.63364613,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.73344797,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003088828,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010051771,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996964},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2162799772","doi":"10.17159/1727-3781/2012/v15i3a2500","title":"Mixed and Mixing Systems Worldwide: A Preface","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal/Potchefstroomse Elektroniese Regsblad","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Oxford; University of Cambridge","keywords":"Scholarship; Jurisdiction; Law; State (computer science); Political science; Thriving; International law; Sociology; Social science","score_opus":0.02539429521708089,"score_gpt":0.2957537107665136,"score_spread":0.2703594155494327,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2162799772","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7994156,0.037729383,0.0031134954,0.02333059,0.0049876464,0.0022742709,0.000035574598,0.00093251036,0.12818094],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98144364,0.007970814,0.00036737527,0.00013179911,0.0028655494,0.0000901108,0.000008898883,0.00014098929,0.006980841],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9920394,0.0008634533,0.0011698644,0.0010359751,0.0016140902,0.0032772627],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9947667,0.00034711798,0.0016525544,0.0014908264,0.00057815557,0.0011646332],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0047165677,0.0007958158,0.0010645277,0.0002812699,0.012063302,0.004454098,0.0018781349,0.0005459195,0.00015244339],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007470655,0.00077823154,0.0004601527,0.00028428642,0.0016104295,0.0025954938,0.00039409165,0.0024106484,0.000064964086],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005619698,0.00036875374,0.0066524427,0.00013099404,0.0013653716,0.00021002848,0.008102125,0.00020355705,0.002558841,0.9031989,0.0030282626,0.07361878],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003073531,0.00056439365,0.0025610644,0.0003340319,0.0003889294,0.0005105421,0.0070561995,0.00046792006,0.00062015856,0.010467285,0.97272015,0.0012357931],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011947053,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.028378015,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9696919,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001829533,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012970415,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998908},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2163544984","doi":"10.1080/10406020802046331","title":"Cross-Border Litigation Gains Traction in U.S. and Canadian Courts","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Claims Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Traction (geology); Political science; Law; Business; Engineering","score_opus":0.019022057507745067,"score_gpt":0.3458004729089937,"score_spread":0.32677841540124863,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2163544984","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98840505,0.00016419367,0.000015911759,0.0013260122,0.00023369084,0.00007805493,0.000004903864,0.0000068384293,0.009765337],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9952228,0.001853324,0.000031323645,0.00017382835,0.00027312635,0.0000021013072,0.0000048047777,0.0000063582916,0.0024323075],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99919885,0.000066505534,0.00015673626,0.00010236056,0.00024349485,0.00023202729],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996099,0.00001762929,0.000059170023,0.000039586626,0.0000050588137,0.00026864666],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003280499,0.00006291223,0.00006773905,0.00009948692,0.0010517382,0.000074350515,0.00003990742,0.0000858157,0.001809106],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000010646096,0.0000682321,0.000027929193,0.000048596798,0.00024565123,0.00045153155,0.0000064660426,0.00023243469,0.000022318483],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019188852,0.00007848545,0.9371953,0.0000013203138,0.000009682063,0.00012733764,0.024743348,0.00008596347,0.0011955708,0.0002723345,0.0002750683,0.03599637],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029124337,0.00002704201,0.83430266,0.0000059384147,0.0000020935397,0.00012467841,0.0013408597,0.000034271325,0.00004690123,0.00016046902,0.16358626,0.000077600096],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.029026894,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.073492594,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16331118,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00053467206,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010940746,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99910337},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2165049268","doi":"10.5539/jpl.v3n1p45","title":"Access to Collective Litigations in China: A Tough Work","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Politics and Law","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Renmin University of China","keywords":"Plaintiff; China; Mediation; Political science; Supreme court; Legislation; Law; Collective bargaining; Law and economics; Business; Sociology","score_opus":0.0204089358417017,"score_gpt":0.336845850808468,"score_spread":0.3164369149667663,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2165049268","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.899633,0.000022865113,0.00003425394,0.011710586,0.00040050218,0.000067763234,0.0000028339996,0.0000031952093,0.088125035],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978135,0.00002283419,0.0002134421,0.0005489199,0.0004862726,0.0000012729726,1.1484626e-7,0.0000028631298,0.0009107704],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994707,0.000032770105,0.00016155442,0.00004566362,0.00014575316,0.00014356336],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99954176,0.00006817337,0.00007001186,0.000037640446,0.000115336756,0.00016707703],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00034714866,0.000036719288,0.00009176595,0.00007660156,0.00024087995,0.00015960746,0.00009643191,0.00004794019,0.00006118663],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012020357,0.000032859483,0.000029688948,0.00022384399,0.00010029068,0.0001994547,0.000020422423,0.00018498361,9.4964344e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010206377,0.000051614803,0.012776586,0.0000022491151,0.000008709794,0.000007516708,0.020381397,0.0000047950793,0.00007803821,0.9645961,0.0010739602,0.0010088173],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033798875,0.00009787065,0.2904682,0.000050250095,0.0000140271295,0.000007867904,0.0010480104,0.0000050486556,0.00012275118,0.06716733,0.6405877,0.00009301921],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003203695,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010248028,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8974288,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000048396632,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018872043,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.571864},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2167094518","doi":"10.1017/s0020589309001201","title":"ARTICLE 23 OF THE BRUSSELS I REGULATION: A COMPREHENSIVE CODE FOR JURISDICTION AGREEMENTS?","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International and Comparative Law Quarterly","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":248,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trinity College","funders":"","keywords":"Formality; Jurisdiction; Code (set theory); Relation (database); Law and economics; Exclusive jurisdiction; Political science; Law; Business; Computer science; Sociology; Programming language; Data mining","score_opus":0.052260574153025874,"score_gpt":0.3436548449102697,"score_spread":0.29139427075724383,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2167094518","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94992584,0.00007438244,0.0023634841,0.008979312,0.00051025744,0.00043698307,0.000047859732,0.000028827433,0.037633024],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99802244,0.0000056513886,0.0001407153,0.0003671818,0.00020027714,0.000012968328,0.0000071813943,0.0000015491025,0.0012420255],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992728,0.00006291736,0.00019253328,0.00012377056,0.00025090735,0.00009702415],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99940175,0.000078864054,0.00012470187,0.00007181784,0.00028771927,0.000035162055],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00010536737,0.00006421069,0.000105072155,0.000021700143,0.00032470172,0.000056882727,0.00012375119,0.000032903976,0.00004774311],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000029684156,0.00005082214,0.00006285007,0.0000750929,0.00018145371,0.0002138809,0.000005976179,0.000043087384,0.000004321405],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009597084,0.000091114365,0.00046467816,0.0000021996962,0.00004043202,1.2278502e-7,0.022186235,0.000020047464,0.0035384907,0.9653968,0.0007376914,0.0074261934],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015026889,0.0007764778,0.23190337,0.000064443055,0.00004181322,0.0000028967522,0.0080517875,0.0029940407,0.0031056446,0.13471383,0.61664337,0.00019963204],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00024605897,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001284594,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.830683,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003100262,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000021762986,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24973759},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2170496276","doi":"10.1002/iir.1215","title":"UK Cross‐Border Cooperation: Extending Rescue to Jersey Debtors on a ‘Passporting’ Basis","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Insolvency Review","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Scope (computer science); Insolvency; Law and economics; Law; Business; Computer science; Political science; Economics","score_opus":0.03722315612111433,"score_gpt":0.43447054059867096,"score_spread":0.39724738447755664,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2170496276","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.30944118,0.013778233,0.0008806761,0.0905856,0.006471759,0.0032219205,0.000038914473,0.0003525291,0.57522917],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94500405,0.024103314,0.000519057,0.010418925,0.0011067257,0.0003548413,0.00003085543,0.000023080534,0.018439142],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998265,0.000085220265,0.0005019026,0.00030584104,0.0005956072,0.00024640263],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988857,0.00006967362,0.000117331976,0.00018020556,0.00057934865,0.00016773534],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007169886,0.00013680845,0.00020595644,0.00010091196,0.000383888,0.00024877145,0.00031321018,0.00006705229,0.01561818],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00083196984,0.0001251031,0.00013619076,0.00033593614,0.000052728905,0.00038097933,0.00004913736,0.00013520708,0.0012706374],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000040934785,0.00047083714,0.019512076,0.0003033279,0.00019285607,0.000024776538,0.0056684366,0.00018913386,0.00052732514,0.24889876,0.105517484,0.6186541],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010345874,0.000052456588,0.007921405,0.001257193,0.000012649363,0.000002133927,0.00006893194,0.000050165632,0.000037993173,0.0000984834,0.99022603,0.00016910178],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030485229,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010369576,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8847085,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020876326,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011013352,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999507},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2186923397","doi":"","title":"Global Outlook on the Electronic Communications Convention)) Prospects for Canadian Implementation of the UNCITRAL Electronic Communications Convention","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Convention; Treaty; Law; Political science; Scope (computer science); Legislation; Politics; Computer science","score_opus":0.04158720581671024,"score_gpt":0.366888553569753,"score_spread":0.32530134775304276,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2186923397","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4147072,0.0024521032,0.0022433677,0.24785413,0.0012631918,0.011226406,0.00036900342,0.00024851228,0.31963608],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973637,0.0002886542,0.000050790648,0.0005797775,0.00008361771,0.0002706009,0.000067063076,0.000008154376,0.0012876821],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99835306,0.00036306612,0.00028604365,0.00011071545,0.0002607891,0.000626314],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99837303,0.00017592772,0.00020577763,0.0009289256,0.000210538,0.000105825944],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014374537,0.000098475044,0.0001032223,0.000041826537,0.0020219136,0.00005928712,0.0009505298,0.00007233339,0.00030547628],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006655336,0.00007144812,0.00016928068,0.00039940223,0.0003849149,0.00021565867,0.00007294113,0.00016307592,0.000014780124],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004680892,0.000064745975,0.020203235,0.0000026197856,0.00003956192,2.3663203e-9,0.0016860317,6.044304e-7,0.000029776427,0.9754188,0.0010433524,0.0015065601],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00057874905,0.00013941701,0.087139435,0.000018823632,0.0001264861,7.655554e-7,0.008982984,0.00013467515,0.0003000439,0.02963701,0.87277234,0.00016926897],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.15977854,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.88921994,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9457818,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011722407,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013180427,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992773},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W219396504","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.720223","title":"Constitutional Authority Over Copyrights and Private Copying","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Copying; Law; Business; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.011674184486573631,"score_gpt":0.2957284341580446,"score_spread":0.28405424967147097,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W219396504","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9353986,0.0033335995,0.009720889,0.00750514,0.00048757228,0.00016291525,0.000002905538,0.000079026206,0.04330939],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99325323,0.0038954488,0.00014021674,0.000116352276,0.0011385244,0.0000013250756,9.579989e-7,0.0000032810385,0.0014506438],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982402,0.00008856426,0.00016121221,0.00012279123,0.00031583718,0.0010714278],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996442,0.00004075258,0.00008534301,0.000049330265,0.000058333222,0.000122030935],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017520664,0.00007747152,0.00009616187,0.00003957748,0.0012669796,0.00011545639,0.00010451477,0.00007651082,0.00021290345],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000043497537,0.00007029799,0.000047809703,0.00009484628,0.00042274554,0.00038773502,0.000017435483,0.00076943054,0.000019493866],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014034639,0.000019183799,0.0028050249,7.1443145e-7,0.000026100932,0.0000010321971,0.0007888906,0.0000033895053,0.00006632644,0.97224975,0.000092223534,0.023933306],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00051895616,0.000058980804,0.0024128314,0.000013256686,0.000022111868,0.00009667285,0.0005943575,0.000100075944,0.00003073613,0.15355569,0.84245867,0.00013768357],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002620047,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0041260803,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8423664,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007189773,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013788462,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97447115},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2194967447","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.2811","title":"Book Note: Fault Lines of Globalization: Legal Order and the Politics of A-Legality, by Hans Lindhal","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Principle of legality; Politics; Order (exchange); Political science; Globalization; Law; Fault (geology); Law and economics; Sociology; Economics; Geology; Paleontology","score_opus":0.018844290381754867,"score_gpt":0.30893007401613154,"score_spread":0.29008578363437665,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2194967447","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0080745155,0.012743142,0.009481871,0.035597946,0.0013843897,0.0003386814,0.00008028987,0.000038461043,0.9322607],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99443275,0.00076056074,0.00035904438,0.0007038425,0.0007561171,0.0000011728016,0.0000034806988,0.000007953633,0.0029750848],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984936,0.00024779938,0.00037434787,0.00009308437,0.00058886845,0.00020228009],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99865586,0.000081013604,0.00027610455,0.000106961525,0.0007000093,0.00018002864],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011516502,0.00008830221,0.00020929742,0.000022793532,0.00050149456,0.00012845991,0.00019991858,0.000107566215,0.00008648464],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019611251,0.00006338195,0.00007054923,0.00013902404,0.00079585816,0.00032182244,0.00004518335,0.00016518756,0.0000014336197],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000059268878,0.00006251183,0.0005465488,0.000008474106,0.00003045888,0.000002162743,0.0044868765,0.00004329558,0.000039447703,0.9830711,0.011083674,0.0005662055],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002005918,0.00010978357,0.00012673637,0.000046496272,0.00007894101,0.00004608898,0.0018417297,0.0003626508,0.00035646438,0.026304992,0.9685973,0.00012292663],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08162152,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.035868905,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9863582,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004575751,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026325742,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98172396},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2196910315","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511778278.020","title":"Plate section","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Section (typography); Geology; Computer science; Operating system","score_opus":0.0140318607432354,"score_gpt":0.2972574624565435,"score_spread":0.2832256017133081,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2196910315","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000012725904,0.000037217203,0.00013723483,0.00038555244,0.0029279694,0.00009650097,0.0000022612217,0.00039941905,0.9960011],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00024652772,0.00021951478,0.00013204086,0.000070526534,0.0037600263,0.0000032305438,0.000004036708,0.00006654389,0.9954975],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99959975,0.000017674169,0.00004354858,0.00009810851,0.00014085635,0.0001000495],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99981457,0.000007323604,0.000043718297,0.00007917506,0.000010677379,0.0000445538],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00011497541,0.00005341893,0.000063565036,0.00006902978,0.00010882716,0.000034771158,0.00006316354,0.00038324547,0.059235185],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000009283552,0.000049200386,0.000033351862,0.000056545803,0.000056253397,0.00002081458,0.000007515189,0.0001492257,0.00033644104],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[6.645067e-7,0.000006223961,0.00002839086,0.0000022507977,0.0000070674073,5.539955e-7,0.0004639367,9.5188755e-9,0.00001978367,0.0215312,0.9585081,0.019431861],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000034105335,0.0000042854435,0.000041147483,0.0000077362765,0.0000049740866,1.5477791e-7,0.00006684791,6.171888e-7,0.0000033022757,0.00009897258,0.99967057,0.00006728854],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.033562336,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15862015,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12505782,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000014271439,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000046257537,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9728733},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2201366296","doi":"","title":"Not Merely Facts: Trade Usages in German Contract Law","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Norm (philosophy); Law; Political science; German; Context (archaeology); Arbitration; Legislature; Law and economics; Sociology; History; Linguistics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.01618352066453366,"score_gpt":0.3026983830871364,"score_spread":0.28651486242260277,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2201366296","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.937302,0.0010638568,0.00011721566,0.022800762,0.00028311944,0.00025027702,0.0000012990631,0.000047912064,0.03813357],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9942783,0.0033999353,0.000009608691,0.0005831566,0.0004216968,0.000007299679,8.548298e-7,0.000011188825,0.0012879563],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99725586,0.000180626,0.00027013427,0.00014014612,0.0003586991,0.0017945324],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99955004,0.0000782589,0.0001231236,0.00008227167,0.00003646305,0.00012984371],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016175334,0.00010734084,0.00016110236,0.000078670455,0.00047308923,0.00019190286,0.00023875432,0.00010846845,0.00038323007],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004049344,0.00009680663,0.0000910406,0.00014374529,0.00012302298,0.00065050815,0.000010885215,0.0012556456,0.0000805369],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019126242,0.00007689618,0.0014030446,0.0000015735402,0.000044038075,0.0000047285416,0.0050802026,0.0000039781667,0.0011614966,0.9304052,0.00015765282,0.061642077],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020864096,0.00045846752,0.07826011,0.000053853506,0.000047120517,0.00011646487,0.009433296,0.00010300418,0.00044523552,0.25075075,0.6576446,0.00060065894],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019468348,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07932431,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6796544,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007191885,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00092152815,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9870611},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2202062549","doi":"","title":"Lost in Transition: Answering the Questions Raised by the Supreme Court of Canada's New Approach to Jurisdiction","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Jurisdiction; Connection (principal bundle); Law; Political science; Original jurisdiction; Service (business); Set (abstract data type); Business; Engineering; Computer science","score_opus":0.008238839868952278,"score_gpt":0.24013447202234744,"score_spread":0.23189563215339518,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2202062549","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5719327,0.004205477,0.083666936,0.19841029,0.00085564936,0.0011982316,0.000024345596,0.000056237972,0.13965018],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9954998,0.0003929054,0.0000158428,0.00014202965,0.0004896351,0.00000473564,0.00000295103,0.0000072873154,0.003444839],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982044,0.00017567266,0.00024517594,0.000108966844,0.0004240823,0.00084166776],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996277,0.000053285177,0.000085922955,0.00009975305,0.00006804785,0.00006528727],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019019274,0.00007883357,0.000100603305,0.00004743106,0.00064621365,0.00005451391,0.0002366713,0.000041974978,0.000037712667],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000023554021,0.000055340115,0.000053983033,0.00036597738,0.00006864019,0.0001123135,0.000006812221,0.000647444,0.0000014486253],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002548777,0.0004847235,0.0027080318,0.000012894734,0.0001911803,0.000003682092,0.034624312,0.016853562,0.0033669882,0.8299137,0.082212254,0.029373817],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018009519,0.00025240038,0.017537279,0.00007790051,0.00010279992,0.00014054471,0.035293847,0.0009622025,0.00034632138,0.06691043,0.8760946,0.00048074976],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.632253,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9307827,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7938823,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010127258,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004922142,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.87316686},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2203970239","doi":"10.2307/2586231","title":"The Common Law Mind: Medieval and Early Modern Conceptions. By J. W. Tubbs. Baltimore and London: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2000. 253p. $42.50.","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Content (measure theory); Law and economics; Sociology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.013905505361678217,"score_gpt":0.29971205071297474,"score_spread":0.2858065453512965,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2203970239","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.36980268,0.04851575,0.000064697124,0.09337355,0.00017590303,0.0014986779,0.00014219776,0.00014400504,0.48628253],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.69813704,0.29952502,0.00005213716,0.0016899637,0.00006989266,0.0000035790374,0.0000014451493,0.000004864233,0.0005160118],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977561,0.00028201373,0.00020933303,0.0003727164,0.00057310035,0.00080669345],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986131,0.00026932798,0.00007920781,0.00022824472,0.00008030509,0.0007297688],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010393083,0.00013322772,0.00029363082,0.000029088247,0.0016822108,0.00018149888,0.00039675977,0.00003766455,0.00013452795],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008622759,0.00010072532,0.000057490703,0.00061438145,0.012576591,0.00041480354,0.00008457717,0.00016835608,0.0000133834],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010522133,0.00003879453,0.0006364193,0.000030504087,0.000008056207,0.0000035738656,0.0011168544,1.06286905e-7,0.000008596828,0.28306824,0.0011232682,0.71395504],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009873118,0.00008310972,0.004526389,0.00012733215,0.000044440854,0.000005458286,0.00028322477,0.000048587848,0.0000037580583,0.00029282988,0.9943464,0.00013977081],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.097965404,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026088038,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9932231,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017820873,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024812936,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99961746},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2209862075","doi":"10.1017/s0069005800007542","title":"The Internet in Light of Traditional Public and Private International Law Principles and Rules Applied in Canada","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Yearbook of international Law/Annuaire canadien de droit international","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Law; The Internet; Political science; Context (archaeology); Conflict of laws; International law; Choice of law; Adjudication; Convention; Common law; Legal aspects of computing; Constitution; Geography","score_opus":0.016943304210711056,"score_gpt":0.2086740138354284,"score_spread":0.19173070962471736,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2209862075","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3837083,0.00017557453,0.0000070245296,0.015910262,0.0008772741,0.00023449773,0.00037724368,0.000009324865,0.59870046],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960367,0.00025706584,0.000106367035,0.0006266978,0.00021138013,0.000038663256,0.000058788486,0.000015497284,0.0026488404],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99798757,0.00006010602,0.0005844217,0.00030470488,0.0006499174,0.00041328926],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987991,0.00022447844,0.00022391591,0.00013335193,0.00025843,0.00036074605],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00056735665,0.00015838537,0.00020522732,0.00038960372,0.00014361383,0.00013078658,0.00075741997,0.000107415195,0.00046657491],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020945641,0.00017387258,0.0000477204,0.00012921405,0.00047872032,0.000319887,0.00007481875,0.00023996508,0.0000025560012],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020519909,0.000027735005,0.028947528,0.000005822086,0.000078620506,0.000037749895,0.0016297377,0.000019495912,0.000022462133,0.9663014,0.0004984568,0.0024104994],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00080928503,0.000028856275,0.07523681,0.00014493531,0.000008523971,0.000036022084,0.001178026,0.0028489686,0.00009380885,0.0145565085,0.9047766,0.0002816749],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9684048,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9995296,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95174485,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034057428,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011877078,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8905899},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2215097367","doi":"10.1017/s0069005800007566","title":"In the Name of the International: The Supreme Court of Canada and the Internationalist Transformation of Canadian Private International Law","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Yearbook of international Law/Annuaire canadien de droit international","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Internationalization; Globalization; Political science; Politics; International law; Law; Conflict of laws; Supreme court; Political economy; Sociology; Economics; International trade","score_opus":0.009493910066858615,"score_gpt":0.2176118620159596,"score_spread":0.208117951949101,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2215097367","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1727352,0.00017056591,0.00002318908,0.17153135,0.003424114,0.0007666591,0.0016819927,0.000008402676,0.64965856],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99264663,0.00022911589,0.000038658953,0.0034169345,0.00032199727,0.000044370612,0.000059679587,0.000018202685,0.0032244255],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966213,0.00021344928,0.0009396575,0.00025456687,0.001565617,0.00040539788],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997354,0.00043378895,0.00058962026,0.00035641505,0.0010390193,0.00022718892],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017131601,0.00020329573,0.00027609724,0.0005185572,0.00031205802,0.000104417864,0.0030240088,0.00013411394,0.0010031157],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005290196,0.00014800989,0.00020031047,0.0003864194,0.0014087327,0.0004410786,0.00008475325,0.0003655965,0.000001979514],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000048556925,0.000031580767,0.00526597,0.00001012541,0.0002524257,0.000010376981,0.011243012,0.000213214,0.00003312103,0.9775913,0.004880838,0.0004195034],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013423599,0.000028926223,0.020060604,0.00021238434,0.000049965092,0.00006170765,0.0033239424,0.0037248097,0.0003710859,0.012675801,0.95791405,0.00023433269],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99504477,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9996055,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96491545,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020423883,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017188197,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999101},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2216016638","doi":"10.7202/1100776ar","title":"La pratique judiciaire du droit international privé au Québec en 1995-1996","year":2023,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue québécoise de droit international","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.012476219094110117,"score_gpt":0.278332671971412,"score_spread":0.26585645287730186,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2216016638","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.41636825,0.00033767088,0.0009854824,0.14845541,0.009904576,0.0004292826,0.00026312165,0.0004105979,0.42284563],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9124588,0.002685701,0.00017906514,0.0011559393,0.008089119,0.00011732439,0.00027196828,0.00006792836,0.07497418],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965252,0.0003856991,0.00076228194,0.0006672619,0.00097158644,0.00068795244],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976919,0.0008405102,0.00042129998,0.00031456744,0.00038428392,0.0003474197],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018588607,0.0003417902,0.0003693257,0.00042784918,0.00046407362,0.00027747228,0.001187782,0.00054593355,0.001696588],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009865325,0.00046296394,0.00040617006,0.00066036725,0.00048004056,0.0007580582,0.00022080613,0.0006793772,0.0014059742],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008827455,0.00038278272,0.034618843,0.00007481765,0.0004928762,0.0005344782,0.039330296,0.00046937529,0.00019261577,0.8104447,0.0115650585,0.10180588],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00054240465,0.000070321905,0.07794812,0.00039710483,0.000074368174,0.00021214306,0.0016432161,0.009697151,0.000029729728,0.012075097,0.8968804,0.00042997033],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.37348324,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5470871,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8853153,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0064885514,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037103333,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997822},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2217891573","doi":"","title":"CORELAREA NORMELOR JURIDICE ÎN SISTEMUL DE DREPT AL STATELOR UNITE ALE AMERICII","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.2967331681979392,"score_gpt":0.5740858709116878,"score_spread":0.2773527027137486,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2217891573","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.936058,0.0049997927,0.0003773873,0.0012935038,0.0009020018,0.0005216465,0.00005752744,0.00010790771,0.05568226],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95839816,0.035707336,0.00020737514,0.001252568,0.00044314167,0.00003690419,0.000017295632,0.000053987573,0.003883227],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99609584,0.00058117387,0.0008642073,0.0004689069,0.0012395346,0.00075032824],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99699706,0.00048817648,0.0009273728,0.00042573398,0.0005660377,0.0005956045],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020136936,0.00031866305,0.00070048263,0.0005662175,0.0016575998,0.000905796,0.0022235967,0.00016106956,0.008883536],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00033820228,0.00031627106,0.00026800364,0.001494344,0.0006807928,0.0026115864,0.0004710524,0.00049926614,0.000065107175],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005470168,0.0007867145,0.76988757,0.00006829926,0.00049829594,0.00037774266,0.018600347,0.00022696953,0.027398815,0.00081880385,0.12190022,0.058889203],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000497156,0.00002279082,0.43724278,0.00013975702,0.000082113256,0.000027364063,0.0010090559,0.000053471842,0.0018920813,0.00073591125,0.5578742,0.000423297],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023828324,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016587278,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.435974,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00031089975,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008159087,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99992895},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2218501108","doi":"","title":"Waiting in a New Line at City Hall: Registered Partnerships As an Option for Relationship Recognition in Canada","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"General partnership; Relevance (law); State (computer science); Value (mathematics); Nova scotia; Political science; Politics; Obstacle; Public administration; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.22269721522823016,"score_gpt":0.33258836531208524,"score_spread":0.10989115008385508,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2218501108","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9934133,0.00018079187,0.0004671641,0.002024737,0.00014055497,0.00023021756,0.0000017197883,0.000012699589,0.0035287824],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974998,0.00041158558,0.00011398207,0.000065337175,0.00032181773,0.000008477728,0.000015331623,0.000009415298,0.0015542149],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99807143,0.00022380876,0.00031886695,0.00016189681,0.00021751628,0.001006491],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994374,0.00009227791,0.00020046704,0.00007222729,0.00007046383,0.00012714791],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027678667,0.00007939622,0.00011169511,0.000108001805,0.00035772106,0.000033268596,0.00011704952,0.0000854698,0.00006460448],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00037190522,0.000087199616,0.000041440497,0.00020357841,0.000022905768,0.00038379268,0.000008943926,0.00065868045,0.0000029930209],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013066367,0.00020010868,0.35175166,0.000016462523,0.00004805979,0.000019182407,0.032113694,0.00004665139,0.00009959287,0.40375966,0.00013103346,0.21050727],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0027819818,0.0006278296,0.06985125,0.00015429728,0.000040399136,0.000081372345,0.03127135,0.0012553757,0.00009772179,0.88517725,0.00822537,0.0004357781],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.901846,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99958414,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.48141763,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0047066365,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008992058,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991141},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2219907631","doi":"","title":"Intellectual Property and Private International Law: Comparative Perspectives","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Intellectual property; Political science; Enforcement; Jurisdiction; Legislature; Law; Conflict of laws; Context (archaeology); Comparative law; Public administration; Geography","score_opus":0.028384559942387342,"score_gpt":0.3171008365089493,"score_spread":0.28871627656656196,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2219907631","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7997165,0.006681304,0.0025767058,0.00637518,0.0009238074,0.00022830424,0.000002586652,0.000068621855,0.18342699],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9877546,0.005130497,0.0000542878,0.000062958985,0.0010697887,0.0000029245252,0.0000010052387,0.0000058196097,0.005918113],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983294,0.00013698448,0.00012443717,0.00010073727,0.00026000832,0.0010484323],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995984,0.00007036851,0.000071061004,0.00004249157,0.00010426878,0.00011342166],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014531796,0.00008039765,0.000099403915,0.000054392047,0.00062792335,0.00010778857,0.00014639064,0.00004697765,0.00018082745],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009942294,0.00005721341,0.000044890196,0.00008160207,0.00024999576,0.00055413425,0.000033522014,0.0006923941,0.000024331193],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003766955,0.00006276135,0.0011154423,4.4273932e-7,0.00008482469,2.0245857e-7,0.0847123,3.5862257e-7,0.00008593044,0.90691924,0.00013951842,0.006841291],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00047381912,0.00019957364,0.0011986786,0.00001507775,0.000026953683,0.00011339395,0.15384586,0.00003268898,0.000095383046,0.055962626,0.78783065,0.00020530539],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00041889373,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002282492,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8509566,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00064033957,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00042248346,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.48295423},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2222492351","doi":"","title":"ALI Family Law Report","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Family law; Law; Business; Political science","score_opus":0.011305844176247677,"score_gpt":0.28829336029107067,"score_spread":0.276987516114823,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2222492351","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.348744,0.0015565184,0.00028669837,0.004205046,0.0003392685,0.00008494991,5.684175e-7,0.000075537515,0.64470744],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93755466,0.007874646,0.000021224125,0.00038608545,0.0010800544,0.000002004545,0.0000014970278,0.000010136743,0.05306969],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99760044,0.00010182465,0.00022438388,0.00013442429,0.00039879157,0.0015401384],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999609,0.000019420268,0.00008314523,0.00011277826,0.00006592266,0.00010971856],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002489452,0.00007664278,0.00010262524,0.00003238998,0.0009221965,0.000107242355,0.00018225108,0.00007681354,0.0007901417],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000020097723,0.00007217224,0.00010311536,0.00014459155,0.000119739125,0.00025656747,0.0000065362683,0.00079571275,0.00013045518],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020911491,0.00003582337,0.0003809932,4.7031781e-7,0.00004407106,0.000037845344,0.0013458467,0.00000507797,0.00007315869,0.86376905,0.0004941353,0.13379261],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017461376,0.00007079771,0.00049523695,0.000005032698,0.000014534487,0.00033974004,0.0018567562,0.0000028670984,0.0000068806676,0.12615384,0.87078696,0.00009273145],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0065141097,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017848393,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87029284,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00056084635,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017411975,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9959822},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2224330119","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1022","title":"Independent Child Legal Representation: A Concept in the Making","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Representation (politics); Political science; Computer science; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.032219969325136384,"score_gpt":0.37999114699862024,"score_spread":0.34777117767348387,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2224330119","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25582555,0.00035507238,0.00004465144,0.2807211,0.00023946624,0.00014980946,0.0000027639114,0.000010174894,0.46265143],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9876719,0.00007173218,0.000019955321,0.0054595154,0.006606762,7.887347e-7,2.0583e-7,0.000002719656,0.00016641323],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99905044,0.0001860029,0.00022513041,0.000051082978,0.0003483837,0.00013893466],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996853,0.000036177666,0.00016495536,0.00003230902,0.000054898086,0.000026393333],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000687062,0.000044775385,0.00010925323,0.00005819921,0.0005830722,0.00014702634,0.00012477582,0.000060809787,0.000028957402],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000035258523,0.00003381473,0.00007020043,0.00012855508,0.00018320727,0.0003308539,0.000013843619,0.00020984125,0.0000010643868],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015930396,0.000034216668,0.0002823984,0.0000012374217,0.000009354527,0.000008546523,0.16217563,0.000004752995,0.0000054890597,0.8225658,0.0006009112,0.014295737],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00055722287,0.000040860938,0.015849262,0.000017469352,0.000012758089,0.00003934626,0.017282184,0.000004918408,0.0000067308843,0.0028524327,0.96327394,0.00006285879],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005502003,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0051470893,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96267307,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007398243,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012189456,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8317419},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2229064158","doi":"","title":"Enforcement of Non-Monetary Foreign Judgments in Australia","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"ANU Open Research (Australian National University)","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Enforcement; Law; Political science; Business","score_opus":0.2871291089835885,"score_gpt":0.44008430814232213,"score_spread":0.15295519915873362,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2229064158","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5085904,0.000001817778,0.0000080332375,0.0010186584,0.00004143845,0.00062220555,0.000031594314,0.000006726748,0.48967913],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8597628,0.00009401057,0.00017027253,0.000015567877,0.00004371904,0.000002225678,0.00003128859,0.0000032927826,0.13987683],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978041,0.00023288021,0.00017587465,0.00022399098,0.0011902716,0.0003728685],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99908954,0.00010795187,0.00006189518,0.00010892947,0.00047724118,0.00015446497],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014623402,0.000071936374,0.00013125304,0.0005106167,0.0004882672,0.000041587497,0.0007352175,0.00009507491,0.001995718],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000069159105,0.000085766216,0.000049692113,0.0012702625,0.0004459007,0.0007519696,0.00018672404,0.00022590614,0.000055325672],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004760165,0.0007140053,0.109045036,0.000034482044,0.000114111455,0.00038588326,0.009878362,0.0003539827,0.0006401703,0.7867295,0.09057544,0.0010530077],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0022163184,0.00028726523,0.14229982,0.00008625864,0.000008308161,0.0000026117227,0.008046991,0.00006921833,0.0011357124,0.0066251694,0.8389553,0.00026704773],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.079175726,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004360801,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.78010434,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00045610304,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005696998,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99891657},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2230079045","doi":"","title":"GLOBAL REACH, LOCAL GRASP: CONSTRUCTING EXTRATERRITORIAL JURISDICTION IN THE AGE OF GLOBALIZATION","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; Dalhousie University","funders":"Dalhousie University","keywords":"Globalization; Jurisdiction; Political science; Law; Opposition (politics); Legislature; Politics","score_opus":0.015959254558613883,"score_gpt":0.2963842333416712,"score_spread":0.2804249787830573,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2230079045","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7783816,0.00018532948,0.01361293,0.00051882194,0.0038198035,0.0004634628,0.00001806037,0.0001189082,0.20288108],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99778205,0.00003215622,0.00025412865,0.00016552511,0.0016866227,0.000004966359,0.000020209232,0.000005978059,0.00004835915],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99808455,0.00027393192,0.00044265814,0.00022167695,0.00062479015,0.00035240405],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993567,0.00010195817,0.0001590343,0.00018473742,0.00010686844,0.00009068912],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002245267,0.000116057934,0.00016661304,0.000043763386,0.00036004776,0.000109255256,0.0002561574,0.00019529871,0.00006410321],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012429747,0.00010309138,0.00007901788,0.0006169797,0.0004554222,0.0003317741,0.000025943227,0.00016125118,0.000009416045],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012311066,0.000112141184,0.080652095,0.000014324891,0.000016107218,0.000034428333,0.0046466,0.000048874674,0.00042575927,0.89668596,0.0005452103,0.016695365],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0021527486,0.00023476216,0.153639,0.00015604735,0.00007794321,0.000028629722,0.024086574,0.00006687408,0.00069480797,0.026340444,0.7920108,0.0005114036],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04997151,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1341644,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87034553,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00029461854,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000121469624,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9563548},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2233782463","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511815300.006","title":"Law and society","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Arbitration; Law; Ruler; Political science; Politics; Mediation; State (computer science); Morality; Sharia; Legislature; Islam; Sociology; Law and economics; History","score_opus":0.026744327006529647,"score_gpt":0.22776801724830165,"score_spread":0.201023690241772,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2233782463","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000060853657,0.00036656336,0.000029688033,0.000049739163,0.0002270282,0.00020293557,0.000061712526,0.00011167612,0.9988898],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.004302081,0.0011135413,0.00003923366,0.00018911726,0.00045341864,2.0760203e-7,0.000010088412,0.000017699631,0.9938746],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991789,0.000029083018,0.00008104961,0.00023470457,0.00023360785,0.00024269005],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993824,0.000044648466,0.000101834885,0.00017684065,0.00008339178,0.00021088358],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00017655388,0.00016337654,0.00019017777,0.000028184653,0.00072354154,0.000054936052,0.0001748055,0.0003789186,0.000017104141],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000002098424,0.00020314116,0.00016138164,0.0000035937167,0.00072531274,0.00012686818,0.00016013593,0.0002578411,0.000008890952],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008093401,0.0000031261877,0.0000016322577,0.000016687973,0.0000522089,0.000007836156,0.0013131301,1.4859681e-8,0.0000064471237,0.98286486,0.013284937,0.0024410484],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017115776,0.000011328287,0.000016468319,0.000035923786,0.0001327431,0.0000013626202,0.0002412415,0.0000014639279,0.000011816012,0.000023434739,0.99913204,0.00022105146],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030371884,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000752568,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98584706,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013844756,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007150496,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8283856},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2236363435","doi":"","title":"Introduction to a Special Issue of the Canada-United States Law Journal","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canada-United States law journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.01465744482680575,"score_gpt":0.23982699149073372,"score_spread":0.22516954666392797,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2236363435","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7307529,0.000297934,0.0003161409,0.13888387,0.02623667,0.0009909862,0.0005979746,0.00007435647,0.10184918],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94934475,0.0007564335,0.00037795957,0.01375534,0.031306624,0.000008411503,0.00011227551,0.00007921254,0.0042589735],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963412,0.00056904764,0.00073829514,0.0002212621,0.0013858724,0.0007443055],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969266,0.0001163581,0.00055740064,0.00027474327,0.0013208231,0.0008040558],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011541956,0.000243021,0.00031254618,0.0002473418,0.0036055117,0.00023886397,0.0007131283,0.00010017574,0.0034127403],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020274293,0.00019366744,0.00011193566,0.0012823391,0.0004181873,0.00032915638,0.000071806164,0.00085537153,0.0000037455743],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022701711,0.00009312449,0.0007052753,0.000016268132,0.00023148971,0.00015395635,0.028635267,0.0015827819,0.00005680337,0.0467611,0.9173501,0.004186776],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035662903,0.000107818116,0.0008855362,0.000043566186,0.00005958683,0.0001322178,0.02096217,0.000058590296,0.0004270186,0.0011803012,0.97554904,0.00023752156],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9984717,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9998623,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21859188,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014014802,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027396944,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99769163},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2237946526","doi":"10.7202/1069366ar","title":"GIBRAN VAN ERT, USING INTERNATIONAL LAW IN CANADIAN COURTS (THE HAGUE; LONDON; NEW YORK: KLUWER LAW INTERNATIONAL, 2002)","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue québécoise de droit international","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; International law; Political science; Conflict of laws","score_opus":0.027526974196285036,"score_gpt":0.28510144039416185,"score_spread":0.25757446619787683,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2237946526","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.043083295,0.00021136632,0.00062701036,0.017231062,0.004930362,0.00036449556,0.00007525523,0.000073086856,0.9334041],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97522444,0.00014350632,0.0005058352,0.0038708062,0.0016797846,0.000022500624,0.0000628556,0.00003537396,0.018454896],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997546,0.0001552146,0.0005176861,0.00042541476,0.0007343462,0.00062132836],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986621,0.00014557011,0.00020972661,0.0002659413,0.00026726595,0.0004493808],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010060051,0.00021661856,0.00020655652,0.0003272929,0.0004598109,0.00044630043,0.0010291549,0.00020060383,0.004698606],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002803158,0.00024231695,0.00017969031,0.00025124618,0.00025066306,0.00062212313,0.000043427797,0.00037691637,0.00015979895],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027366877,0.0000797394,0.0062882937,0.0000028499808,0.00009828585,0.0000607587,0.003674845,0.00081411796,0.00008617936,0.9841402,0.003240675,0.0014866678],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00059260003,0.000011637934,0.0014744712,0.00008749669,0.00001955369,0.000060626426,0.0004291578,0.0028752305,0.000055239114,0.0201753,0.97395426,0.00026445003],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.83140564,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9537909,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97071356,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024738456,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014121889,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99621123},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2240531620","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511809217.014","title":"Plate section","year":2007,"lang":"es","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Section (typography); Computer science; Content (measure theory); Database; Operating system; Mathematics","score_opus":0.019703540048153903,"score_gpt":0.31395013504859465,"score_spread":0.29424659500044076,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2240531620","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00049195864,0.00012686204,0.00074760587,0.00056518207,0.0042861677,0.00022119551,0.0000037902091,0.00020833132,0.9933489],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0074506686,0.0020561707,0.000097333745,0.00021882144,0.0059376303,0.0000028441339,0.000006799642,0.00006985327,0.9841599],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987438,0.00005446952,0.0001938043,0.0002795711,0.00041745856,0.00031090222],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994938,0.00004346614,0.00014871109,0.00015158961,0.00004674344,0.000115721814],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00051197305,0.00017592676,0.00019030343,0.0002741906,0.00029687615,0.00011407565,0.00013114829,0.00061537663,0.06665929],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000146562425,0.00016325094,0.0001230674,0.0003436639,0.00014250592,0.000073573334,0.000024084164,0.00021676447,0.0032212033],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000055174918,0.00020445247,0.0012018285,0.00006874428,0.00019762566,0.000018589562,0.0064579304,0.0000020475172,0.00013250284,0.20784435,0.40798113,0.37583566],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015877836,0.00005014641,0.0012163623,0.00005663015,0.000028945573,0.0000010140413,0.00045177146,0.000011667315,0.000019919025,0.000112467445,0.9976815,0.00021078257],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009210114,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005344436,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5897004,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009891668,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007201564,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9975549},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2241435909","doi":"","title":"Addressing Aboriginal disputes in Canada : a new initiative","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology)","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Geography; Environmental planning","score_opus":0.037766488863968065,"score_gpt":0.3220813184965003,"score_spread":0.28431482963253224,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2241435909","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7416634,0.0071467333,0.00008448575,0.019363921,0.0072668027,0.0015793289,0.00027905026,0.0005444285,0.22207184],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9825786,0.0025008924,0.0015131723,0.00012436302,0.00040559212,0.000077473676,0.0002485756,0.0000598303,0.012491507],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99713856,0.00005930427,0.00066291145,0.0005959824,0.0008484624,0.0006947955],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99834883,0.00005892653,0.0007175194,0.00044205625,0.00025064166,0.00018200572],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00018599899,0.00043204837,0.0007603889,0.0010777266,0.00039809474,0.00006276471,0.00079326745,0.000968866,0.00032238744],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003613281,0.00048256476,0.00012953026,0.0017090908,0.00038818375,0.0004753872,0.0000395854,0.0010458411,0.000009681722],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00031759628,0.00057930034,0.08026079,0.0006551332,0.0008694556,0.000994972,0.05593038,0.00014699777,0.001016841,0.09262024,0.07792376,0.6886845],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00068376074,0.000055876397,0.008937086,0.0011071141,0.00009932393,0.0000024509059,0.007017875,0.000034081004,0.00072070485,0.0010940968,0.9796572,0.00059043197],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.87174153,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9959084,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90173346,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015196835,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009161879,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997626},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2241629490","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199296064.013.0013","title":"Comparative Legal Families and Comparative Legal Traditions","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"reference-entry","venue":"","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":53,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Legal pluralism; Legal realism; Scientism; Sovereignty; Normative; Law; Legal profession; Legal research; Empirical legal studies; Legal history; Political science; Legal culture; State (computer science); Comparative law; Sociology; Social science; Politics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.08876847003633374,"score_gpt":0.3458378726875742,"score_spread":0.25706940265124045,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2241629490","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007868141,0.0019792567,0.00013659224,0.001055255,0.0009705564,0.00048017854,0.00042114742,0.0001636568,0.98692524],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.34180197,0.019548388,0.00023155138,0.00015559836,0.0021532082,0.000067188055,0.0007320989,0.000015007363,0.635295],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99791557,0.00026126017,0.00037259306,0.00045642495,0.00058573147,0.00040840992],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990286,0.00025476026,0.00019140598,0.00015834732,0.00018555377,0.00018129611],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00019440467,0.00033830685,0.00073558826,0.00019640413,0.0012005067,0.00047547108,0.00021123505,0.0003699917,0.0006850415],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000007474797,0.00030702498,0.000150596,0.00027327397,0.000935366,0.0004888321,0.000031430212,0.0005494893,0.00006348095],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014869853,0.00011960789,0.00006145867,0.000023963783,0.00009838412,0.000006829437,0.012726779,0.0000032887488,7.2324934e-7,0.26540244,0.7189897,0.0025519845],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025044067,0.00008308955,0.0021081825,0.000094976,0.000086681765,0.000003391394,0.011343001,0.000033451866,0.000007462564,0.00042904186,0.98519385,0.00036640352],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.040800605,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08630823,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3516302,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017561877,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00056735193,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999382},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2242234524","doi":"","title":"IGC 2000: The Constitutional Agenda","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.022729492305968744,"score_gpt":0.28690770868677,"score_spread":0.26417821638080125,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2242234524","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.070661955,0.0005582039,0.000058523983,0.0085417675,0.00055682665,0.00021802301,0.000022072934,0.00013817329,0.91924447],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9429398,0.00025080744,0.0000866883,0.0033599904,0.0011608509,0.000019743358,0.000008513832,0.000006062678,0.052167516],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987887,0.00013877715,0.00016388866,0.00018663656,0.000417451,0.00030451964],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994718,0.000082880455,0.000037655554,0.00020323302,0.000057855046,0.00014658456],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00053907087,0.00009187212,0.000096320844,0.000016443866,0.0015250708,0.00017656924,0.00026691708,0.0000869439,0.028800445],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000047536112,0.00007148546,0.00008799196,0.00019016625,0.0011956325,0.00026259053,0.000018297224,0.00019312129,0.002436041],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016087628,0.00003752039,0.0007593516,0.0000016574214,0.000017748533,0.000007673801,0.0017102688,0.000034201275,0.00004156866,0.9591941,0.021848045,0.016331766],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018152231,0.000013540081,0.0020388204,0.000009105555,0.000011133313,0.0000033645565,0.0002471863,0.000010362478,0.000031462594,0.0027263733,0.9946239,0.00010322119],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00886405,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0065286113,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9727759,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010204865,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00035499418,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997748},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2243019493","doi":"","title":"The Beginnings of English Law [Book Review]","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; History; Philosophy","score_opus":0.007672248686932119,"score_gpt":0.2715811304718825,"score_spread":0.26390888178495037,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2243019493","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00037125565,0.021694977,0.000011403208,0.0061550275,0.00022397397,0.00011039505,4.6182726e-7,0.000042740743,0.9713898],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.48616457,0.07098134,0.00016439827,0.020127665,0.0037015947,0.000038068218,0.000005934656,0.000018989991,0.41879743],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995066,0.000038736664,0.0001177202,0.00005322792,0.00018092734,0.00010276829],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999583,0.000078523975,0.000050390594,0.0000846342,0.00018548657,0.000017982082],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004934742,0.000028655224,0.000059606173,0.0000052410583,0.00033842586,0.00002231404,0.00009994038,0.000022082902,0.00042738704],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007989277,0.000018683138,0.000043273718,0.000080597645,0.0002471334,0.00008419411,0.000011193875,0.00003247831,0.000009101143],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[7.51048e-7,0.0000064658016,0.00009134427,0.000007680731,0.0000016628312,8.22104e-8,0.00082362443,1.07507276e-7,0.000007168863,0.6818865,0.315447,0.0017276297],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029907256,0.000006841091,0.00018272226,0.00003528835,0.00000545019,2.2587287e-8,0.00016972821,6.649637e-7,0.00008373942,0.0007126299,0.9987467,0.000026341206],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010093802,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003979232,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.68329966,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000011901996,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000024876088,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99649805},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2246410725","doi":"","title":"Supreme Court of Canada: Canada v. Khadr -- Introductory Note","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Legal Materials","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.006920887764073496,"score_gpt":0.2566967373765154,"score_spread":0.2497758496124419,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2246410725","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9254485,0.000005235467,0.0000061475093,0.017281415,0.015274827,0.00008474977,0.00021954175,0.000015178291,0.04166444],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99389726,0.0000052940272,0.000060544535,0.0002725838,0.001957172,0.0000044905796,0.00002096369,0.000006661364,0.0037750506],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99875396,0.000043767544,0.00025789102,0.00013205547,0.0006415121,0.00017079884],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99933964,0.000054324068,0.00012887364,0.00011002418,0.00028815164,0.0000789907],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004019544,0.00007105387,0.00012659065,0.000031972973,0.00012387503,0.00006194487,0.00029444782,0.000049716524,0.0048573446],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00027824426,0.000072449606,0.000019483628,0.000040826075,0.00008879978,0.00014870583,0.000035275996,0.000080646285,0.0000031228474],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008078234,0.000040802643,0.002025394,0.000012634116,0.00006291872,0.000024031155,0.0009165858,0.000010235773,0.571028,0.31852934,0.10657189,0.00069740287],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010315377,0.0000053796716,0.013566063,0.00000591898,0.0000048585434,0.000002080003,0.00007469034,0.0000028104675,0.052978642,0.00019018081,0.9329866,0.00007960153],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99929935,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9998147,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8264147,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002617042,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034367412,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9960523},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2248283402","doi":"","title":"Backlash and the Construction of Legal Knowledge: The Case of Child Custody Law","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Backlash; Law; Political science; Child custody; Engineering","score_opus":0.010968618743308175,"score_gpt":0.27389830356292927,"score_spread":0.2629296848196211,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2248283402","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.48918092,0.000994761,0.000021121425,0.005663137,0.00043512412,0.00030112927,0.000008941794,0.000028308532,0.5033666],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977445,0.0003756652,0.00004401104,0.0002424595,0.00037234716,0.000008572465,0.0000010456798,0.0000064207134,0.0012049638],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989883,0.00028250564,0.00024819828,0.00014213317,0.00016773574,0.00017115186],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992146,0.00020279191,0.00014554402,0.00022302187,0.00013604006,0.00007800053],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009450407,0.00008673596,0.00017549076,0.0000209377,0.00088658393,0.00007181083,0.00016037354,0.00007923255,0.00026637412],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000078012636,0.000054256616,0.000084884516,0.00022682603,0.002223546,0.00022746531,0.00005133797,0.00019253792,0.0000142505905],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000053743566,0.000030311478,0.00048940897,0.000007858494,0.000022367598,0.000008803769,0.00233522,0.0000023719763,0.000030589537,0.99189746,0.00035967652,0.004762201],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010727709,0.000044193956,0.0006293926,0.00003925818,0.00006513545,0.00026631623,0.004875182,0.00004890205,0.00031293737,0.0047630407,0.98778254,0.00010035693],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.040684737,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07435921,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9874228,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002328722,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000060654937,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9657034},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2254561243","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1011","title":"DNA, Discrimination and the Definition of Family Class: M.A.O. v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration)","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Immigration; Citizenship; Family reunification; Immigration law; Political science; Refugee; Charter; Kinship; Family law; Law; Ethnic group; Contradiction","score_opus":0.03395841325068359,"score_gpt":0.3068113461500742,"score_spread":0.2728529328993906,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2254561243","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9467408,0.00018426252,0.00003951016,0.011916697,0.00008199932,0.000058694746,0.000008578556,0.0000013728295,0.040968094],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99828917,0.0003317842,0.00002888243,0.0007831669,0.00050414953,3.1530146e-7,8.1153985e-7,0.0000026475254,0.000059094913],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.999196,0.000100249614,0.00030209825,0.000041369243,0.00026586436,0.00009442387],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992529,0.00017608448,0.00032974183,0.000022965585,0.00017104788,0.000047247042],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009714765,0.000047105954,0.00015915865,0.00004877537,0.0003236709,0.000029094914,0.000038893297,0.00005665835,0.0000022008494],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006121891,0.000034547495,0.00003835973,0.00006798838,0.00056839635,0.00010057216,0.00001107063,0.00007378953,2.0796152e-8],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010150238,0.000009562065,0.0005194749,0.000020019184,0.000021105403,9.2912825e-7,0.026030093,2.8146012e-8,0.00036256592,0.9685581,0.00024242852,0.004134202],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0056538247,0.00046301674,0.57208973,0.00016864098,0.00034869506,0.000035322308,0.10111316,0.000011183445,0.0007105776,0.2518351,0.06723655,0.0003341931],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.269455,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3609291,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.71672297,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000042314066,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024743922,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7354098},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2254587135","doi":"","title":"Parallel Proceedings - Converging Views: The Westec Appeal","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Race (biology); Flexibility (engineering); Jurisdiction; Law and economics; Political science; Law; Business; Computer science; Sociology; Economics; Management","score_opus":0.013457964438046262,"score_gpt":0.27821201529470724,"score_spread":0.264754050856661,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2254587135","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7112337,0.0046204934,0.00046278216,0.033029858,0.00040309402,0.00040168798,7.111106e-7,0.00014108508,0.2497066],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95966333,0.015877796,0.000016641052,0.00035588848,0.001152235,0.000007161195,4.0855844e-7,0.000011561041,0.022914952],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99755335,0.0000679999,0.0002053421,0.00013209428,0.00039362276,0.0016475741],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996488,0.000028101202,0.00010011673,0.00006321969,0.00007006978,0.00008967593],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028067408,0.000098222794,0.000112280395,0.00003642938,0.0014995447,0.00020055201,0.00034201297,0.00006677102,0.00063070585],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000023230577,0.00006953816,0.000106224215,0.0002096205,0.00014985706,0.00031652488,0.000011405726,0.00111,0.0001315767],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006851286,0.000047559268,0.0023445091,0.0000030584042,0.00008446978,0.0000018910165,0.015183741,0.000014985377,0.000039305483,0.7201669,0.0012750184,0.26077002],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000354552,0.00010008074,0.0009299822,0.000016634734,0.000025749481,0.00009678459,0.010949156,0.000045894176,0.000003441012,0.061352275,0.92599934,0.000126126],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00070778053,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035777907,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9247243,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004842132,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011248724,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998004},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2255541280","doi":"","title":"Re-Imagining Haj Khalil v. Canada: Cultural Competence and Tort Law","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Tort; Law; Federal court; Political science; Duty; Duty of care; Causation; Immigration; Competence (human resources); Sociology; Psychology; Liability; Social psychology","score_opus":0.010508118503583418,"score_gpt":0.27404111346502413,"score_spread":0.2635329949614407,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2255541280","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.55281913,0.008831744,0.00039855792,0.083554216,0.000958683,0.00022924956,0.000003276222,0.00010986049,0.35309526],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99466497,0.0024236722,0.00003863572,0.0008534555,0.0005071725,5.5391945e-7,9.363888e-7,0.0000040924942,0.0015064896],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99805325,0.00007368369,0.00016052417,0.00012880124,0.00035765272,0.0012260864],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99959904,0.000025261323,0.00008695598,0.00006024578,0.000093700604,0.00013481935],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009637597,0.00008718677,0.000115768664,0.000021030339,0.0009803243,0.0001395966,0.00015499421,0.000041017847,0.00002875707],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000032582142,0.000077448254,0.000035899153,0.0000998641,0.00010617246,0.00032171872,0.00001072764,0.00071401254,0.0000015328159],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013241693,0.000012334358,0.0010384454,7.521537e-7,0.000022317465,0.000008694431,0.0034441387,0.0000030941783,0.000131819,0.96613675,0.0003109623,0.028877428],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006888752,0.0003238193,0.008130421,0.00004300693,0.000046680074,0.00021069052,0.0625147,0.000056002682,0.00004697004,0.08762532,0.8399141,0.00039943602],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.57095915,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97278935,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8785114,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00096013723,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032249885,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.75399613},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2255784296","doi":"","title":"상품권거래와 법제개선방안 연구","year":2012,"lang":"ko","type":"article","venue":"정책연구보고서","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Statute; Legislation; Law; Payment; Certificate; Legislature; Finance; Political science","score_opus":0.029746297913652492,"score_gpt":0.317290957939412,"score_spread":0.2875446600257595,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2255784296","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5722539,0.0029541599,0.00011218354,0.006922543,0.009033958,0.00032040916,0.000019309566,0.00017082559,0.40821275],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9676194,0.00066614046,0.000079354926,0.00058486033,0.0045063123,0.000009340945,0.0000057383645,0.00002015633,0.026508655],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980442,0.00017042003,0.00025997823,0.00022500023,0.0004999766,0.00080040406],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990288,0.00009954136,0.0001257872,0.00026920906,0.000073188115,0.0004035002],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00086608436,0.00017892863,0.00021258216,0.000056716195,0.00066310447,0.0001258996,0.00023890035,0.00023728407,0.005282652],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000080550955,0.000178231,0.0001639493,0.0003562012,0.00024115303,0.0005428605,0.000077743716,0.00021507996,0.0029969055],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000066763576,0.0010761049,0.30382735,0.000080221056,0.00020080716,0.00001376733,0.1558674,0.0000034090322,0.0009471919,0.21000685,0.09619536,0.23171477],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021314133,0.000050723906,0.07589732,0.000027336295,0.000056364224,0.0000023061766,0.0021716405,0.000019647317,0.00013929867,0.0002877389,0.9208986,0.00023584765],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002529541,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00040598016,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8247033,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012514206,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001061554,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99777937},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2255968584","doi":"","title":"Registered Partnerships: A Model for Partnership Recognition (Disponible en Français: Les unions libres enregistrées: Un modèle de reconnaissance des rapports personnels)","year":2001,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"General partnership; Context (archaeology); Commission; Value (mathematics); Political science; Principal (computer security); Public relations; Sociology; Library science; Law; Geography; Computer science; Computer security","score_opus":0.18752168678533365,"score_gpt":0.3255195186373213,"score_spread":0.13799783185198766,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2255968584","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.59862757,0.07797502,0.2753594,0.03175571,0.00083851255,0.001090172,0.00006465935,0.00025368383,0.014035252],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8770715,0.06933784,0.0012867635,0.00021861627,0.001820077,0.00009997504,0.000028718787,0.00007696677,0.05005956],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9929143,0.001026799,0.0007399463,0.0005978192,0.00047654266,0.004244593],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99787796,0.00038019355,0.00057757576,0.0003228242,0.00034632618,0.0004951185],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0079039745,0.00044380693,0.00046594377,0.00020824547,0.0026351486,0.00033134894,0.00053210283,0.00054308114,0.00032368902],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00045535446,0.00048730176,0.00054597546,0.00059699867,0.00084886694,0.0012188957,0.000035332043,0.0018217663,0.000031998723],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012917715,0.0007662709,0.004948796,0.00018593758,0.0007538762,0.00004291709,0.08030391,0.002012254,0.0003416158,0.24594684,0.0030906673,0.66031516],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0022783603,0.0008706879,0.00035241563,0.00075754593,0.0005106043,0.0009488111,0.053363554,0.041489698,0.00010973748,0.7322467,0.16613887,0.0009330138],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021948325,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03517674,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6593821,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018023803,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003950242,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997579},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2256184578","doi":"","title":"Interpreting Copyright Law & Internet Facts","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Statutory law; Statutory interpretation; The Internet; Interpretation (philosophy); Context (archaeology); Legislature; Judicial interpretation; Legal aspects of computing; Common law; Law and economics; Political science; Law; Internet privacy; Business; Computer science; Sociology; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.011692061293764445,"score_gpt":0.3039792003554856,"score_spread":0.29228713906172116,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2256184578","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21871518,0.0000035738503,0.00030910614,0.0016967242,0.0008271331,0.000051183557,4.2128943e-7,0.000108915636,0.77828777],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98235995,0.000003129159,0.0002538338,0.0007343093,0.00023643009,0.0000022295974,9.643678e-7,0.0000039287897,0.016405242],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99948686,0.000027422995,0.000088683824,0.000102871636,0.00013928204,0.00015489147],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997152,0.00005451458,0.000027136286,0.00007951973,0.00004010038,0.00008352913],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003107751,0.00004488438,0.000054039512,0.000018322353,0.00018284081,0.000114137554,0.00013643596,0.00006697675,0.00631799],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000048999365,0.000037817616,0.000034176668,0.00005081826,0.00016134484,0.00017027263,0.000030491046,0.00014543213,0.00022379361],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000035002115,0.000013889303,0.0012277085,8.964951e-7,0.0000041391236,0.0000011883415,0.01029638,4.0252743e-8,0.0016334408,0.9738711,0.0037554163,0.009192285],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000050631395,0.000011961128,0.00036009468,0.0000050490257,0.000002240352,4.850256e-7,0.0005019751,0.00006860707,0.0019545425,0.0013842699,0.995599,0.00006115641],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01644986,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.060870424,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9918436,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000013815159,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000023916808,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99459034},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2256484701","doi":"","title":"International Law's Mixed Heritage: A Common/Civil Law Jurisdiction","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Comparative law; Civil law (Civil law); Law; Political science; Jurisdiction; Common law; Public law; Municipal law; Israeli law; Scholarship; International law; Chinese law","score_opus":0.014208094704537585,"score_gpt":0.2763546892971283,"score_spread":0.2621465945925907,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2256484701","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3085717,0.0012288961,0.0016314636,0.010759054,0.0028971813,0.00020861221,0.0000060669468,0.00021645467,0.67448056],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98402196,0.0069756703,0.000042873122,0.00036530502,0.0016873007,0.000006181972,0.0000065637782,0.00001763791,0.006876521],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99729,0.00019797309,0.00029615464,0.00018240452,0.00064242136,0.0013910122],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993675,0.000048147223,0.00016566037,0.00012023846,0.00015976331,0.00013870464],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001607364,0.00012938994,0.00016001903,0.00007689371,0.0018937963,0.00012273653,0.00036298853,0.00012656057,0.00027256657],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002667857,0.00013115145,0.00015994183,0.00017151097,0.00033100857,0.0005867403,0.000034928995,0.0012398902,0.00006492721],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000044777757,0.00009059032,0.0011137266,8.5218664e-7,0.00009213939,0.000013327271,0.0031742975,0.000006873173,0.000106434905,0.9875027,0.00052352407,0.007330742],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007001684,0.0001632624,0.0009987031,0.000012660042,0.000024070556,0.00042152562,0.0033041365,0.00003340262,0.000043723012,0.10942268,0.8846818,0.00019384737],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006213134,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12718457,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8841583,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011366969,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010503066,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994056},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2257456618","doi":"","title":"Crossing the River by Feeling the Stones: Rethinking the Law on Foreign Judgments","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Common law; Supreme court; Political science; Municipal law; Precedent; Feeling; Public law; Work (physics); Comparative law; Psychology; Social psychology; Engineering","score_opus":0.01322639198532087,"score_gpt":0.2735602578972054,"score_spread":0.2603338659118845,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2257456618","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8484724,0.005084147,0.0024637561,0.037787847,0.0007084066,0.00045314868,0.0000024961885,0.000072237344,0.10495554],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99374264,0.00069985364,0.000006312393,0.0010761637,0.0011755796,0.0000048804977,0.000001051907,0.000013489585,0.0032800036],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972744,0.00034903197,0.00021924796,0.00013744888,0.00065571006,0.0013641445],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99928784,0.00024064125,0.00019764372,0.00017339607,0.00006979276,0.00003066463],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0051825615,0.00011405616,0.00008753247,0.00001915419,0.009440343,0.00078641676,0.0005441787,0.00007317813,0.000024560873],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000038428552,0.000054082557,0.00012418792,0.00017730877,0.0006607649,0.00020404469,0.000030855994,0.0016635767,0.000012892204],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019543037,0.000022330865,0.0004045762,4.7502803e-7,0.000038007074,9.138919e-7,0.009621561,0.00011135314,0.000085294,0.9807655,0.00073002715,0.008200384],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003201747,0.00008625244,0.00059579586,0.000029017554,0.000046702284,0.000042065767,0.017083505,0.00011499878,0.000074516174,0.6721376,0.30933806,0.00013127054],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009478212,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014995867,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.30862787,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006538126,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00071995077,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99711776},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2258196808","doi":"","title":"Book Review: Substance and Procedure in Private International Law by Richard Garnett","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Conflict of laws; Law; Doctrine; Political science; Private law; Comparative law; Municipal law; Procedural law; Centrality; Law and economics; Sociology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.004737880568937979,"score_gpt":0.2590876679153135,"score_spread":0.25434978734637553,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2258196808","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.055145115,0.8173608,0.0013817921,0.06263212,0.00055947545,0.0005109766,0.0000033332649,0.000072426046,0.06233391],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3331816,0.6507203,0.00001458722,0.007097124,0.00040349894,0.000007962574,0.0000030789183,0.000010225615,0.008561633],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984565,0.00011242874,0.0001983743,0.00014152654,0.00029357808,0.0007975918],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999676,0.000023358876,0.00012067361,0.00005563589,0.000055655342,0.000068692396],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020397543,0.00007799677,0.0001216993,0.00003606615,0.00022261436,0.000058923823,0.00018709448,0.0000518176,0.00011123831],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006657042,0.0000726611,0.000034878285,0.00010364443,0.00008255408,0.0002945012,0.000011887663,0.00066820666,0.000007782303],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028567387,0.00004875388,0.0031183348,0.000027147935,0.00003612009,0.0000012339611,0.0013472623,9.0141776e-7,0.00014095106,0.9416894,0.03805194,0.015509421],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002814494,0.00005019585,0.00031444294,0.00014220996,0.000007826396,0.000019626963,0.00013463192,0.000018898822,0.000012381203,0.02777028,0.97115904,0.0000890219],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00016694957,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0057808068,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9331071,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00037912905,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00027443565,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32258257},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2259741072","doi":"","title":"LSU Law Center Journal of Civil Law Studies, Vol. 1, 2008 (Complete)","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University; Université de Moncton","funders":"","keywords":"Civil law (Civil law); Law; Comparative law; Property law; Political science; Public law; Private law; Sociology; Property rights","score_opus":0.038348880405159595,"score_gpt":0.3042427812302543,"score_spread":0.2658939008250947,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2259741072","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.56783503,0.09951911,0.003926708,0.022143427,0.013075569,0.00075998873,0.000026999833,0.00018747844,0.2925257],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95475626,0.03904415,0.00004367818,0.0004935065,0.002755811,0.0000011942012,9.269838e-7,0.000018258725,0.002886224],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963759,0.00029214326,0.0005659883,0.00014732865,0.0008053087,0.0018133053],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99817914,0.00008680626,0.00046757294,0.00012619232,0.00094539806,0.00019487765],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029240355,0.00016074174,0.00034627647,0.000101894984,0.0017234916,0.00006637898,0.0004119453,0.00010044041,0.00019160584],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013851104,0.00013679845,0.00027709553,0.0002226557,0.0005976641,0.0005150252,0.000040454153,0.0015370087,0.000025634994],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010814842,0.00023112968,0.0020270732,0.000005605614,0.0005387924,0.00005939035,0.010177647,0.000010444019,0.00013653231,0.9746911,0.008692609,0.0033215203],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012179022,0.00046683048,0.00024665013,0.00004636134,0.00005367262,0.0012430663,0.0062206965,0.000003269876,0.000024041989,0.08388143,0.90640384,0.00019226978],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016400883,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08259811,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8977112,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011864506,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020118102,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99957615},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2259909374","doi":"","title":"A COMPELLING SITUATION: ENFORCING AMERICAN LETTERS ROGATORY IN ONTARIO","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Enforcement; Discretion; Law; Political science; Judicial discretion; Business; Judicial review","score_opus":0.011808045359732067,"score_gpt":0.27419540910986645,"score_spread":0.2623873637501344,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2259909374","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9745491,0.00018276546,0.014388083,0.0012272535,0.00022682874,0.0000731495,5.421014e-8,0.000022886728,0.009329858],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982665,0.00027493437,0.00010973837,0.00025762315,0.0003977993,6.941555e-7,7.142638e-7,0.000006881926,0.0006850807],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997738,0.00006826154,0.0002402323,0.00011069763,0.00033117924,0.0015116425],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996014,0.00006648529,0.00014761285,0.000056378474,0.000039114668,0.00008901125],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004263317,0.000074333584,0.000115134906,0.0001556225,0.00043531472,0.0000621962,0.00013971498,0.000034617442,0.000056791898],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000025538868,0.00007961698,0.0000643542,0.0002486821,0.000102841084,0.00022315638,0.000009500011,0.0012398397,0.000011571794],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014014493,0.00009727594,0.3417862,0.0000020679984,0.00008965131,0.00003449862,0.089215025,0.00054069725,0.0014074931,0.31783378,0.000038791128,0.24881436],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0029702338,0.0008735106,0.3420459,0.00015335527,0.00008647622,0.00019706116,0.19521803,0.0002341042,0.0001955853,0.05579254,0.40107992,0.0011532933],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.21954612,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97185427,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.75230813,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004066549,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002300525,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99975663},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2260457615","doi":"10.1080/17536235.2007.11424315","title":"Canada and the US Contemplate Changes to Foreign-Judgment Enforcement","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Private International Law","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Enforcement; Conflict of laws; Political science; Law and economics; Law; Publishing; Economics","score_opus":0.016762771594698533,"score_gpt":0.28943341179609955,"score_spread":0.272670640201401,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2260457615","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6410604,0.00014311787,0.0015112855,0.07495966,0.0022807082,0.00030796006,0.0000104178935,0.000007795256,0.27971864],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99324656,0.00010543362,0.000113115726,0.0048135314,0.0006003032,0.000001504775,6.0522456e-7,0.000003242052,0.0011157197],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988983,0.000031487925,0.00025949234,0.000055062334,0.00062153523,0.00013407622],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99929863,0.000116118004,0.00020730734,0.000044434473,0.00021963782,0.00011384939],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015583141,0.000053343112,0.00009916452,0.00004584469,0.00018992272,0.00007244235,0.00021802526,0.000021890188,0.0001353579],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007079974,0.00003559277,0.000035077013,0.000046710524,0.00009729868,0.00009699149,0.000045177312,0.00008504255,0.0000010940975],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002042876,0.000009079742,0.000950015,0.0000011627175,0.000064965825,0.000017036673,0.0013064172,0.000021569505,0.00010599381,0.99349856,0.0012597226,0.0025611783],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00065896363,0.000051206975,0.0019867714,0.000025264044,0.0000098962255,0.000011788604,0.00037806723,0.000015188024,0.00045151042,0.0029283403,0.993437,0.000046015353],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5112877,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8649237,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99217725,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026156663,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012628439,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4919667},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2261852550","doi":"","title":"Reform of Ontario's Law on Jurisdiction","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Law; Conflict of laws; Plaintiff; Political science; Choice of law; Commission; Legislature; Private law; Enforcement; Common law; Blame; Public law","score_opus":0.010073489727356924,"score_gpt":0.27396041100806545,"score_spread":0.2638869212807085,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2261852550","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.49764353,0.00024241739,0.00026503165,0.0038146814,0.00033499053,0.000091105234,5.214654e-7,0.000037922564,0.4975698],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99079025,0.0009119665,0.000018294162,0.0002236418,0.00041621714,6.4836127e-7,9.5003224e-7,0.0000046111195,0.0076333974],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99823546,0.000054551212,0.0002137087,0.00010130486,0.0003946866,0.001000256],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99958766,0.000011577592,0.00014956144,0.00009236642,0.00008515719,0.000073671734],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015526483,0.000076270044,0.000118522265,0.00007131114,0.00050825474,0.00003546337,0.00015045048,0.00008448127,0.00010491607],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000008606272,0.000067140696,0.000105528314,0.00012438772,0.000065621425,0.00021931932,0.0000045819334,0.00090833113,0.000012299418],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000060081627,0.00006655036,0.00012041551,3.481945e-7,0.000019063064,6.81819e-7,0.0030281805,0.00000368571,0.000098393066,0.96052516,0.000027995831,0.036049478],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006545533,0.0019422927,0.0058570104,0.000033362598,0.00003568398,0.000035246292,0.004118841,0.0000035670303,0.00027469094,0.4888314,0.49804384,0.00016953124],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08767198,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5636855,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49801585,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004920001,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029425095,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99889994},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2262118586","doi":"","title":"THE AMENDMENTS OF THE NEW ROMANIAN CIVIL CODE IN THE FIELD OF CIVIL LAW - THE GENERAL PART. THE NATURAL AND THE LEGAL PERSONS. THE RIGHTS IN REM AND IN THE AREA OF PRIVATE INTERNATIONAL LAW","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Jurnalul de Studii Juridice","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Civil code; Law; Civil law (Civil law); Private law; Political science; Commercial law; Public law; Comparative law","score_opus":0.01294694455184875,"score_gpt":0.29944480007266205,"score_spread":0.2864978555208133,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2262118586","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.831478,0.0011258811,0.000003940018,0.11776086,0.00047970974,0.0007601832,0.000014675686,0.0000046454575,0.04837212],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99542665,0.00059795973,0.0000048949782,0.003111618,0.00045549625,0.00003230598,5.977276e-7,0.00000612844,0.0003643711],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99669397,0.0014604724,0.000476629,0.00019679332,0.00085862906,0.0003135311],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969056,0.0021195682,0.0003836029,0.00047195517,0.00009275615,0.000026506235],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005083301,0.00016213735,0.00021723777,0.00003047137,0.0014326887,0.00019670103,0.0015503155,0.00007144708,0.000018653],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023725114,0.0000498923,0.00011833721,0.0004101169,0.0023686837,0.00015002186,0.00025563076,0.00060994306,4.1676563e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00041249458,0.00011009883,0.008392899,0.000008168838,0.00016206234,0.00000429794,0.16312978,0.000013030902,0.00017378807,0.81944126,0.007035529,0.001116603],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0023456842,0.00017899908,0.18551892,0.00019861988,0.00014672025,0.000027463784,0.02621006,0.0005990324,0.00040355657,0.021960953,0.7622216,0.00018840717],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02775195,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.50182855,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7974803,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000053415883,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014120765,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998673},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2262497743","doi":"","title":"Reputational Fallacies in International Law: A Comparative Review of United States and Canadian Trade Actions","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Brooklyn journal of international law","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Reputation; State (computer science); Political science; International law; Compliance (psychology); Law and economics; Law; Business; Economics; Social psychology; Psychology","score_opus":0.08039602248073814,"score_gpt":0.403834335563757,"score_spread":0.32343831308301885,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2262497743","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000333004,0.9433121,0.000023288489,0.0047518946,0.0010087454,0.00032287338,0.00042612385,0.000007725645,0.050113942],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0015462786,0.99653196,0.00026434447,0.00055621477,0.00031482868,0.000011593629,0.00036230776,0.000013785167,0.00039867967],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99729204,0.00026316967,0.0012542461,0.00018273466,0.00081315846,0.00019465474],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99756014,0.00034415652,0.0011521189,0.000082940496,0.00064335455,0.00021726497],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009109055,0.00021565557,0.0008436879,0.0007282302,0.00016407146,0.00010871598,0.00049767696,0.00015557012,0.00034705267],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016256195,0.00019744615,0.00032653433,0.00035723214,0.00041570957,0.00044867507,0.000033455526,0.00045427773,0.000003818492],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027367136,0.00015037319,0.000038753034,0.0037864195,0.00072585593,0.00006622933,0.0038113126,0.00008517832,3.980642e-7,0.95625687,0.0009838076,0.034067445],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002687915,0.00004164716,0.000053231448,0.044099215,0.00012881728,0.00012204445,0.00047800975,0.0000064520905,5.6017785e-7,0.0015115902,0.95313793,0.00015169423],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.050126646,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.18183903,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9547453,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008507543,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015288531,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.95619863},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2262629863","doi":"","title":"Relocation, Indeterminacy, and Burden of Proof: Lessons from Canada","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Relocation; Normative; Discretion; Indeterminacy (philosophy); Context (archaeology); Best interests; Supreme court; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; History","score_opus":0.01902613117649053,"score_gpt":0.26801094850233725,"score_spread":0.24898481732584674,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2262629863","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9883245,0.0014405737,0.00033052918,0.0028054474,0.00016718595,0.000079243975,0.0000037943862,0.0000066797893,0.0068420093],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971564,0.0017874312,0.000035650883,0.000022163082,0.00023266237,0.0000014997328,0.0000010223569,0.000004875256,0.00075830496],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988936,0.000067084504,0.00015460572,0.00008647968,0.00021978759,0.00057842716],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996082,0.000025973026,0.00013252685,0.00006573299,0.00009838439,0.0000691564],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006850497,0.000051705036,0.00008857989,0.00003194155,0.00027886522,0.000015893442,0.00013323787,0.000046188095,0.000060199804],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000047968064,0.000048874674,0.00002095895,0.00008136847,0.000077150806,0.000119372446,0.000014171637,0.00036763464,5.5823017e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011046263,0.0000823319,0.044294618,0.0000086560685,0.00025188123,0.000008629763,0.07008083,0.000003119813,0.00064384233,0.3925973,0.00046158765,0.49145675],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013912324,0.0005480988,0.09532943,0.000105742234,0.00018106702,0.00008596406,0.12057294,0.00007213952,0.0018943184,0.67538965,0.10387012,0.0005593008],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.94054997,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9796116,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49089745,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004068176,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006316795,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99931645},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2262998801","doi":"","title":"Why Should a Confinement Need to Be 'Significant' to Attract Liability? A Proposal to Clarity and Reform the Current Approach to Forcible Confinement","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"CLARITY; Current (fluid); Liability; Business; Political science; Accounting; Engineering; Electrical engineering","score_opus":0.0680318117645147,"score_gpt":0.337792285669337,"score_spread":0.2697604739048223,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2262998801","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2225137,0.000021485763,0.03726875,0.45103943,0.0006634077,0.007722077,0.000030911397,0.00019738468,0.28054282],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9683117,0.000010930281,0.0033422855,0.024328247,0.00043138544,0.0007175296,0.0000087727985,0.000018636867,0.0028304635],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973866,0.00017686673,0.00041243265,0.00061125954,0.0008132857,0.0005995537],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99836844,0.000083676474,0.000057453788,0.0004667024,0.00024105227,0.00078266114],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027765464,0.00022859103,0.00029539966,0.00012741571,0.00074979506,0.0003349594,0.00040622367,0.00008424125,0.00028950055],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022423343,0.00015411987,0.000078947975,0.0005445988,0.00010681632,0.00010037232,0.00024378738,0.00021494548,0.000039174574],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00051745836,0.0014306873,0.0030683752,0.0001375227,0.00008292909,8.1683123e-7,0.09709494,0.00015774673,0.0032787882,0.44150302,0.15076193,0.3019658],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027963007,0.00060492987,0.005814883,0.000020958043,0.000025131803,3.0774706e-7,0.006001728,0.00018077761,0.00038884414,0.00018436037,0.98623157,0.00026689193],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.035712216,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.029709386,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8354696,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00028193588,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018696267,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98799586},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2264437635","doi":"","title":"Genetics and Insurance Discrimination: Comparative Legislative, Regulatory and Policy Developments and Canadian Options","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Insurance law; Statute; Underwriting; Insurance policy; Legislature; Genetic testing; Medical underwriting; General insurance; Key person insurance; Casualty insurance; Business; Context (archaeology); Political science; Actuarial science; Law; Income protection insurance; Medicine","score_opus":0.021452505730098773,"score_gpt":0.3064814366916654,"score_spread":0.2850289309615666,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2264437635","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98083365,0.004922409,0.00024339143,0.005235167,0.000055224897,0.00010529567,0.000003875023,0.000008360881,0.00859263],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98498213,0.014074025,0.00017432646,0.00006988394,0.00015158937,0.0000021104497,0.0000011384758,0.0000041259323,0.0005406827],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99892986,0.00005462383,0.00011153209,0.00011050505,0.00014170873,0.0006517833],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996326,0.000014381949,0.000057421195,0.000031432373,0.000072020724,0.00019215175],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004810648,0.000072157905,0.000085792526,0.00012818837,0.0010739465,0.00010062494,0.000050402537,0.000048036713,0.0000030086394],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000018842748,0.00007206171,0.000010993803,0.00013483175,0.0002432002,0.00023181798,0.0000127974445,0.000307419,7.634557e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000556632,0.000010384578,0.015153196,0.0000017840731,0.000037912763,0.0000010248403,0.029533532,0.000010784088,0.000032338252,0.9320961,0.000007937431,0.023109427],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00082027,0.00012287644,0.7324128,0.000034751833,0.000018451285,0.000117234835,0.013416952,0.000010424203,0.000019124327,0.22010688,0.03271481,0.00020539995],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.042565264,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7219439,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.71725965,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008131495,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0041191326,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9638104},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2265076134","doi":"","title":"Speakers at the 26th Annual Canada-United States Law Institute Conference","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canada-United States law journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Queen's University; Royal Bank of Canada; Industry Canada; University of Pennsylvania","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.02333792719180397,"score_gpt":0.2463191983104431,"score_spread":0.22298127111863913,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2265076134","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.69561356,0.0015348833,0.00015659671,0.13977328,0.0052902955,0.00081766787,0.0025614926,0.00017907446,0.15407316],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9732637,0.0018625432,0.000039262457,0.015484005,0.00058231695,0.000008618511,0.00042904104,0.000037662496,0.008292898],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961658,0.00045650086,0.0005774447,0.0003045752,0.001453447,0.0010422246],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971231,0.00029315954,0.0003657934,0.00039861986,0.0009290691,0.00089022954],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007048371,0.00032755948,0.00030797417,0.00014604101,0.005815949,0.00047505755,0.000906082,0.000117721764,0.0025196814],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013746686,0.00026272776,0.00008669311,0.00095981796,0.0011631378,0.00054176734,0.00012597733,0.00080085214,0.000012053926],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008222532,0.0000750153,0.0007374573,0.000019994672,0.0003371354,0.0009106881,0.025882725,0.0069558276,0.000016079808,0.13132887,0.83084714,0.0028068176],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005047436,0.00005393969,0.0002561331,0.000044891764,0.000059797985,0.00008398442,0.01842359,0.0015706003,0.000030228193,0.0005043191,0.97810596,0.00036182662],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99931407,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999757,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.27765012,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018541199,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019419652,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999825},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2265499299","doi":"","title":"Transborder Litigation and Private International Law: The View from Canada","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Conflict of laws; Law; Political science; Private law; Business; Law and economics; Comparative law; Economics","score_opus":0.009362956698560269,"score_gpt":0.24603349731061047,"score_spread":0.2366705406120502,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2265499299","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95571965,0.0026623642,0.00072290783,0.029706603,0.00048723805,0.000087860884,0.000005504298,0.000012388768,0.01059546],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9831926,0.014905077,0.000013656428,0.00050173595,0.0005549616,0.0000018804685,0.0000038653443,0.0000044003755,0.00082181673],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988714,0.000085217005,0.00012396713,0.000080321406,0.00032564922,0.00051343744],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997356,0.00004767618,0.00006066632,0.00004595676,0.0000582296,0.00005185741],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005755776,0.00005276127,0.00005880665,0.000012730695,0.000911247,0.000050281018,0.0001551494,0.00003052155,0.00008847957],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000020394997,0.000039600065,0.000025638106,0.000058214588,0.00011723988,0.00016901513,0.000007846039,0.0004618074,0.0000015773525],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019289499,0.000016964626,0.0068033594,7.346512e-7,0.00011507897,0.000004720729,0.0059902114,0.0000056277163,0.00011155732,0.9432648,0.00021373726,0.043453906],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039050527,0.000034344586,0.015849521,0.000012710822,0.000020901784,0.0000695909,0.003231278,0.000030830084,0.000041254014,0.15246487,0.8277406,0.000113559974],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6998723,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.963123,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8275269,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004702423,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022843068,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7008667},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2266649937","doi":"10.1017/cbo9781139031288.026","title":"The common law regime for enforcing foreign judgments","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Thompson Rivers University","funders":"","keywords":"Content (measure theory); Computer science; Law; Internet privacy; Computer security; Political science; Law and economics; Business; Mathematics; Sociology; Mathematical analysis","score_opus":0.03441302793609317,"score_gpt":0.24462882443107198,"score_spread":0.21021579649497882,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2266649937","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000051856023,0.000105690044,0.00019137199,0.00012163535,0.00038670094,0.0011733235,0.00008401237,0.00011201671,0.9977734],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0047285454,0.00022168909,0.000033624598,0.0001241731,0.00036527426,0.0000046823116,0.000026806742,0.000029642433,0.9944656],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99878734,0.00004704397,0.0001715174,0.00029360555,0.0003311514,0.00036935156],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987588,0.00025239977,0.00025602404,0.00037163153,0.0002032945,0.00015785216],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003088373,0.00021907678,0.00025119138,0.0000485631,0.00237166,0.00018816398,0.0005742501,0.0003392603,0.000009664959],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000008350826,0.00021096577,0.00024686902,0.000005755788,0.0005960524,0.00014955734,0.00016884333,0.00025786026,0.00001652534],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004325273,0.0000026117807,7.039658e-7,0.000015794327,0.00007006418,0.0000057409384,0.0002784518,3.5044883e-7,0.000002969774,0.9496761,0.0459502,0.0039537456],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034067014,0.000042539355,0.0000025408601,0.00007578399,0.00012261345,7.2550023e-7,0.0003362728,0.0000292899,0.000034399927,0.00068210764,0.9980914,0.00024164158],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005976997,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00041438808,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9521412,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00028030423,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001087261,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989271},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2266894477","doi":"","title":"Transnational Legal Practice (International)","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.014755508824914882,"score_gpt":0.29283895990955533,"score_spread":0.27808345108464044,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2266894477","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.037179444,0.000065047374,0.0003371914,0.16704407,0.001362103,0.00028990986,0.000009003474,0.0001544946,0.7935587],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9728537,0.000040039857,0.0011568444,0.003342458,0.00091361476,0.00004919901,0.000015622249,0.000010666918,0.02161786],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99858254,0.00011692946,0.00019567965,0.00020329842,0.0006649763,0.00023657035],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99907106,0.00016132905,0.000078804565,0.00012900088,0.00036599464,0.00019378088],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00048695752,0.00008716609,0.00008597604,0.0000425484,0.0004765462,0.00042099913,0.00027406475,0.00009063564,0.007817484],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023396082,0.0000903893,0.00007724256,0.00013263193,0.00013650065,0.0019556414,0.00002057531,0.00017995178,0.0008086973],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000885569,0.00006217035,0.0002803134,0.0000013378335,0.000024993886,0.0000033560189,0.0008126641,0.000007626051,0.00022733347,0.98965365,0.0066467617,0.0022709586],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025713706,0.000017247183,0.0029304242,0.0000034625366,0.000011016399,0.000003697289,0.00079819455,0.000047535323,0.00006185905,0.003868188,0.99188614,0.000115081144],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015560414,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0055933753,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9857854,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012403369,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014129303,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999693},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2270921645","doi":"","title":"Canada-United States Law Institute's Award Presentation to the International Joint Commission","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canada-United States law journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Commission; Joint (building); Presentation (obstetrics); Political science; Law; International law; Library science; Engineering; Medicine; Computer science","score_opus":0.020347778324913374,"score_gpt":0.28208086477534633,"score_spread":0.261733086450433,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2270921645","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.556596,0.00007280354,0.00091781624,0.3688906,0.0145267965,0.00078969216,0.0006651949,0.000110941444,0.057430144],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9796472,0.00016567858,0.00018474701,0.01605984,0.0012299549,0.000014557907,0.00065860024,0.000026658587,0.0020127504],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970268,0.00023443052,0.00050050364,0.0002216362,0.001472771,0.00054383354],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99759233,0.00019330386,0.0002681116,0.0002442549,0.0009453587,0.0007566702],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00086080283,0.00020955686,0.00018640562,0.0001959904,0.0033995484,0.00063499913,0.0007339417,0.00009338422,0.00055091566],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002301244,0.00016584087,0.00006284024,0.00064283767,0.00029949393,0.00043897823,0.00009728708,0.00089119497,0.000004883812],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011237201,0.000081722486,0.00093096873,0.000012361856,0.00020171939,0.00021058803,0.010273268,0.012255039,0.00058110466,0.23801787,0.7329033,0.004419673],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003592767,0.00003279511,0.00092591933,0.000034842637,0.000023922288,0.00003658998,0.0064377934,0.0017979644,0.0002856686,0.00085109775,0.988993,0.0002211695],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9994341,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999662,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4230512,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00093529804,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025375737,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99789786},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2271061355","doi":"10.1515/bjes-2015-0017","title":"The Last Habitual Residence of the Deceased as the Principal Connecting Factor in the Context of the Succession Regulation (650/2012)","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Baltic Journal of European Studies","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Directorate-General for Justice; European Commission; Tallinna Tehnikaülikool; University of Glasgow; Institute for Catastrophic Loss Reduction; Emory University","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Principal (computer security); Jurisprudence; Residence; Bachelor; Legal certainty; Ecological succession; Certainty; Member state; Political science; Law; Member states; Subject (documents); Law and economics; Sociology; European union; Business; Computer science; Geography; Computer security; Mathematics; Demography","score_opus":0.08126982000233142,"score_gpt":0.3517897097106578,"score_spread":0.2705198897083264,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2271061355","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98130965,0.0021540287,0.000009355873,0.009659355,0.0007012861,0.00025058922,0.000001655587,0.0000037686725,0.005910322],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989565,0.00033708298,0.0000066384328,0.00015701303,0.00032737953,9.451434e-7,4.4475673e-8,0.0000067266037,0.00020767258],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99596244,0.002361703,0.0005725768,0.00008425566,0.0008464072,0.00017263021],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964856,0.001639763,0.0010151587,0.000251503,0.0005730569,0.000034940214],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005942822,0.00009352459,0.00017782944,0.000026913189,0.0010728673,0.000065854365,0.0008196575,0.000022559941,0.000005631867],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0051203147,0.000032079515,0.00012874379,0.0002867909,0.00072541874,0.00017146186,0.00019099649,0.0002670812,0.0000020718323],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004151557,0.00019180025,0.18764381,0.00004250175,0.0002458853,0.0000119051465,0.7330864,0.00033279214,0.0022034186,0.031495843,0.0049053985,0.03942508],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00069357903,0.00015406779,0.70721143,0.00048095518,0.000076571356,0.000013960196,0.24925803,0.000021723428,0.00037734027,0.00065768126,0.04097509,0.00007955154],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00029724097,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0037926347,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5195676,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000067075154,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001939788,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8251736},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2273064688","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511977947.016","title":"Plate section","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Section (typography); Computer science; Content (measure theory); Information retrieval; Mathematics; Operating system","score_opus":0.030314491771449646,"score_gpt":0.29251493396307027,"score_spread":0.26220044219162064,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2273064688","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000003513493,0.000084429106,0.00021544533,0.00009485457,0.0016085657,0.00009309642,0.0000017595161,0.00039591375,0.99750245],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00023005126,0.00045417232,0.00009176647,0.000056881454,0.0019269992,0.0000033638892,0.0000027430688,0.00006563935,0.99716836],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996241,0.00002387253,0.00004476445,0.00009625505,0.00011119507,0.00009982458],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99982935,0.000004274064,0.000045235316,0.0000709101,0.000009453484,0.000040779076],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.000097090815,0.00005339128,0.00006446308,0.00007000804,0.0000846118,0.000018261922,0.000060592618,0.00022481517,0.09844911],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000048245147,0.000049207632,0.000033633416,0.000054623637,0.000047298738,0.00002240444,0.000007697814,0.000060972296,0.00079494674],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[9.193399e-7,0.0000064310243,0.000030113082,0.0000022360407,0.000009354467,5.549081e-7,0.0010149535,3.9249994e-9,0.0000010743469,0.034458045,0.9567003,0.007776001],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003176726,0.0000068669096,0.000061572704,0.000012153535,0.0000064103447,1.1516344e-7,0.00010478721,2.1105818e-7,0.0000017639192,0.00017935273,0.99952716,0.00006782149],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.058349483,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.053003993,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.097654164,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000019832383,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003711084,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999831},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2277789524","doi":"","title":"Introduction and Histroy of the Canada-United State Law Institute","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; State (computer science); Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.01093863396645248,"score_gpt":0.242480174350489,"score_spread":0.23154154038403651,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2277789524","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91828316,0.00019741981,0.000020370253,0.034881424,0.0011129433,0.00020780481,0.000022634804,0.00004346341,0.045230772],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9917856,0.000065578795,0.00008394264,0.0010146763,0.0009627186,0.000004179278,0.0000053854087,0.000005563428,0.006072358],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99910516,0.000085231804,0.00017118177,0.00014834854,0.00030815374,0.00018190552],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99950075,0.000019328912,0.000090461,0.00018408491,0.00009453472,0.00011085609],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00028551658,0.00007243361,0.00009847894,0.000021188816,0.00057231396,0.000048708676,0.00014100896,0.000043080006,0.00018717936],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000054385426,0.000060044553,0.000028886709,0.00020925644,0.00040126347,0.00030134196,0.000036959773,0.0001391537,0.000006046312],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003096307,0.000044817472,0.00228042,0.000015178586,0.000032533546,0.000001639443,0.0022910235,0.00029412744,0.000987086,0.964714,0.020822193,0.008486052],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016282842,0.000011029559,0.003381048,0.0000087776025,0.000011054077,0.0000010663923,0.00017089538,0.000020840756,0.0006851531,0.00036382614,0.99511325,0.000070239264],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.89124817,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9878371,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.974291,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019625611,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00027927276,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.44018343},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2282866472","doi":"","title":"Enforcement of Foreign Judgments - Should Fraud Unravel All?","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Plaintiff; Enforcement; Context (archaeology); Political science; Law; Safeguard; Business; History","score_opus":0.033505241774585456,"score_gpt":0.32314174602654944,"score_spread":0.28963650425196397,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2282866472","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3596295,0.004072804,0.01829804,0.012530202,0.00076092186,0.00070694915,0.000008419613,0.00010846574,0.6038847],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9884253,0.00503423,0.00009910816,0.0002939995,0.00070801965,0.000003307836,0.0000023564762,0.000010224272,0.0054234453],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974548,0.00007084263,0.00031176826,0.000117356314,0.00059500226,0.0014501929],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994722,0.000026458418,0.00019857123,0.000099487756,0.000093385104,0.000109908826],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002091915,0.00009701017,0.00014122535,0.00009210703,0.0003449368,0.000042160038,0.00025250483,0.000090164474,0.00065829617],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000031326224,0.00008738136,0.00012403433,0.00013045369,0.00007836146,0.00025076108,0.000023567854,0.00066754804,0.000022455913],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030366014,0.000076063574,0.0010157723,0.0000018730207,0.00011567969,5.169167e-7,0.0025582642,0.000055585635,0.00019953749,0.92014545,0.000391206,0.0754097],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009920114,0.00043206845,0.00047137376,0.000021422042,0.00007023714,0.00002121031,0.009467851,0.00013586733,0.00060117344,0.15984647,0.82773054,0.00020978902],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014082153,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006204426,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.82733935,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009836411,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013421128,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7207881},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2283064137","doi":"10.1017/cbo9781107296916.018","title":"Plate section","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Section (typography); Content (measure theory); Computer science; Link (geometry); Information retrieval; Computer network; Mathematics; Operating system","score_opus":0.014214279089183636,"score_gpt":0.29099768553932226,"score_spread":0.2767834064501386,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2283064137","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000043676987,0.000045860863,0.00092112884,0.00036065333,0.0016169668,0.000083888044,0.0000011677097,0.00039734502,0.9965686],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0005183825,0.0002101721,0.00006728027,0.00011785292,0.0036715583,0.0000029217015,0.000003851414,0.000065126624,0.99534285],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99957883,0.00003526465,0.00004710785,0.00009852213,0.00014146899,0.00009878888],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998195,0.0000094674215,0.000047859066,0.000073351606,0.00000922963,0.000040547995],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00014832144,0.00005309697,0.00007310308,0.000065344975,0.000094349474,0.000030023582,0.00005686786,0.00021978132,0.0320254],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000009256111,0.000048939157,0.000033834764,0.000051832587,0.000042355252,0.000015379159,0.000006760537,0.000060118713,0.0007291716],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[5.150761e-7,0.000003263504,0.000023080192,0.0000028706143,0.0000064119317,1.9529777e-7,0.00027092907,4.929891e-8,0.0000015475359,0.024106434,0.9672313,0.008353452],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000038330967,0.000006646841,0.000041499818,0.00001400538,0.0000054359034,9.37039e-8,0.000052262225,0.000002529289,8.391292e-7,0.00010113096,0.9996698,0.000067464905],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01846043,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.035201218,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03243851,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000021986172,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000028439896,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98807573},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2283283787","doi":"","title":"Canada. La propriété foncière dei Métis manitobani davanti alla Corte suprema","year":2013,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Aisberg (University of Bergamo)","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy","score_opus":0.008655518613613147,"score_gpt":0.19461620131022472,"score_spread":0.1859606826966116,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2283283787","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8051297,0.0012163337,0.00020459064,0.028183792,0.0016949114,0.00054627174,0.00009523057,0.00006726953,0.16286187],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85010755,0.0013732046,0.00035895949,0.00019492254,0.00021082822,6.1313585e-7,0.000017222497,0.00002032275,0.14771637],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976704,0.00029009517,0.00022082964,0.00043411256,0.00070862746,0.0006759277],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998408,0.00017357903,0.00030534453,0.00035010927,0.00040151514,0.00036140374],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003527981,0.00025218894,0.00040875401,0.00009332898,0.00083673483,0.000064923115,0.000606153,0.00034030993,0.009474163],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003239266,0.00033729375,0.00019235419,0.00052145805,0.0007876835,0.0008737129,0.00024440594,0.00029635377,0.00029683876],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007134996,0.00044208058,0.025665957,0.00027103053,0.0006124322,0.00039996314,0.019411905,0.000040297724,0.00087198504,0.08897322,0.61985874,0.24338105],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005740766,0.000097768105,0.108689986,0.00010935061,0.00017086862,0.000014186445,0.011818906,0.00025862877,0.000040869112,0.00032485707,0.8775474,0.00035314518],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9825891,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9808016,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.25768864,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00045492893,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014572202,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999079},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2283811889","doi":"","title":"Canada: Managing Differences at Home and Abroad: Festvortrag anlässlich der Zeugnisübergabe der Internationalen Rechtsstudien 2003","year":2003,"lang":"de","type":"article","venue":"Hochschulschriftenserver der Universität Trier (Universität Trier)","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Business","score_opus":0.015417507321390831,"score_gpt":0.22119050788596728,"score_spread":0.20577300056457645,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2283811889","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.80554533,0.04200334,0.002145888,0.02267901,0.0086891595,0.0029340342,0.00072482356,0.00051516504,0.114763275],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8896406,0.011309644,0.00044730192,0.0013888596,0.00044757113,0.0000064669443,0.00012398098,0.000118170916,0.09651736],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9920453,0.0011195625,0.00080984854,0.002007206,0.0020479336,0.0019701365],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99495596,0.0005441937,0.0007511767,0.00090493227,0.0014415296,0.0014021831],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009888462,0.0012012802,0.0013252549,0.0009304273,0.004604634,0.00043261817,0.001237662,0.00084569276,0.0034015467],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023764955,0.0014205603,0.0004003268,0.003197957,0.0011793496,0.004856557,0.00076747907,0.0010910006,0.00016782919],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0034785336,0.0014628826,0.16892505,0.00076558214,0.021323763,0.009117084,0.08259463,0.00017971992,0.00025728278,0.39104253,0.30893996,0.011912954],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0059000426,0.00025839082,0.04438362,0.00027859586,0.003317971,0.000069025904,0.019471616,0.0003205481,0.000074027055,0.00079250784,0.92302674,0.002106918],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2591674,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.42006543,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.61408675,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025439386,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003812634,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99882436},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2285720775","doi":"","title":"Non-justiciability in Australian Private International Law: A Lack of 'Judicial Restraint'?","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Melbourne journal of international law","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Justiciability; Law; Doctrine; Political science; Conflict of laws; Judicial review; Prerogative; Adjudication; Jurisdiction; Political question; International law; Politics","score_opus":0.04118482205336851,"score_gpt":0.3727313778072658,"score_spread":0.3315465557538973,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2285720775","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7589533,0.000027795812,0.00023716547,0.028928936,0.0026040438,0.00015554442,0.000022407794,0.000013011728,0.20905782],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99611783,0.00009080792,0.0008317311,0.00059579004,0.0015381182,0.0000010205983,0.0000044487942,0.000006674234,0.0008135874],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99748355,0.00010867624,0.0009526272,0.00015162154,0.0010637287,0.00023976938],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982754,0.000115249575,0.0006732791,0.00010470201,0.00069589756,0.00013547944],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019141509,0.00012348847,0.00029196715,0.00022000828,0.000111849484,0.0000945503,0.0006651369,0.00012439297,0.00064340496],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00035477575,0.000119504904,0.00020042394,0.0001754858,0.0003240279,0.000598389,0.000036933412,0.00037074383,0.0000075928892],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00035129237,0.00050783966,0.0090484535,0.000006221029,0.00008864649,0.000067198336,0.0037572356,0.00026466858,0.0029046421,0.97898906,0.0005404111,0.0034743394],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0035169919,0.0007363238,0.30246508,0.000602239,0.00007313397,0.00007334544,0.0018594721,0.00024046008,0.004081252,0.1577414,0.5281763,0.00043398142],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021144317,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035695776,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.82124764,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003416789,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018231463,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7044833},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2286779009","doi":"","title":"Directors of the Canada-United States Law Institute","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canada-United States law journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law; History of the United States","score_opus":0.013160852720148088,"score_gpt":0.24593434509686007,"score_spread":0.232773492376712,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2286779009","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9488881,0.0003008864,0.0000758794,0.024638109,0.0030825578,0.0002979149,0.00038343444,0.00004774698,0.022285331],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99276334,0.00043170105,0.0000456422,0.0058499626,0.0002462569,0.000003614544,0.0001167355,0.000023310167,0.0005194653],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971818,0.00025845645,0.00053281896,0.00018521598,0.0012006182,0.00064109825],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99806106,0.00014454497,0.0003857058,0.0002525565,0.0006443635,0.000511746],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005380892,0.00022050616,0.00026920906,0.00013551908,0.002867594,0.00016337346,0.0006036245,0.00009077589,0.0001576088],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000113149865,0.00017248643,0.0000987584,0.0012074512,0.0007609863,0.00030738747,0.000057862264,0.00055878144,7.1522646e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015710208,0.00023772495,0.0048235827,0.000079410886,0.0007184193,0.00057852815,0.02736692,0.09322344,0.00021915093,0.79340947,0.0755876,0.003598678],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005351845,0.000033755714,0.0012223504,0.00009621898,0.000044341574,0.000024469637,0.005279481,0.000077104436,0.000450252,0.0015630564,0.99044645,0.0002273351],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9998378,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999804,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9148589,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017313856,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0055185994,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99843055},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2288658057","doi":"10.14288/1.0077458","title":"People and place as norms in multistate tort adjudication","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"cIRcle (University of British Columbia)","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Adjudication; Tort; Political science; Law and economics; Law; Sociology; Liability","score_opus":0.006099816499745988,"score_gpt":0.20846105085525632,"score_spread":0.20236123435551034,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2288658057","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9854736,0.000083675404,0.000040053623,0.00082301785,0.000045128458,0.00014537823,0.000010852576,0.00003388275,0.013344422],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969441,0.00062806305,0.0000928426,0.00004490984,0.00002119583,1.4972083e-7,0.0000053041426,0.000002224549,0.0022612046],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99941844,0.000038764872,0.00006510728,0.00017033886,0.00016844903,0.00013890916],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99969697,0.000026519705,0.000059448277,0.00007383754,0.00006253823,0.00008066161],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00022277793,0.000018774077,0.00010720565,0.000030666783,0.00026538037,0.00006109669,0.000102253754,0.00006535017,0.00008281818],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003411978,0.000070512986,0.000027003643,0.00021230307,0.00012546328,0.00031898398,0.00002007279,0.00005986876,0.000008254327],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012408602,0.000085634034,0.042675313,0.000008502737,0.0000045035063,0.000030238507,0.009450268,0.000003737359,0.000055350876,0.000054593635,0.0007763698,0.9468431],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00048568714,0.00005076448,0.98780876,0.00003491839,0.000006448115,0.000004233245,0.005443646,0.00007999635,1.4817742e-7,0.0004740284,0.0055303243,0.00008102407],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.55019563,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9237375,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.946762,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006924624,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007321807,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.45279965},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2288822784","doi":"","title":"The Centrality of Irreparable Harm in Interlocutory Injunctions","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Interlocutory; Harm; Centrality; Law; Political science; Business; Appeal; Statistics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.026428508991621046,"score_gpt":0.32245855813267027,"score_spread":0.29603004914104925,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2288822784","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9268256,0.0048034657,0.0010652255,0.009158224,0.0016140592,0.00020392955,0.0000013334826,0.00003393803,0.056294244],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.992219,0.00310836,0.0000072928565,0.000024163539,0.00021860903,0.0000022686881,2.86525e-7,0.0000036645886,0.004416367],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99828327,0.00021565592,0.00021802925,0.00006947368,0.00027299757,0.0009405808],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995519,0.000052647858,0.000112635906,0.00008407702,0.00011820138,0.00008053621],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0048783747,0.000047401107,0.0000809289,0.000046929053,0.0003510313,0.000046107994,0.00019285089,0.00004246607,0.000016813008],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016686996,0.00003563593,0.000057605735,0.00019966166,0.00014490259,0.00017295354,0.00001533758,0.0006773196,0.0000069145635],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001483944,0.00013309947,0.019480098,0.0000016325117,0.000065582106,0.0000011572229,0.01570086,0.000059896425,0.000054447166,0.91251373,0.0014406999,0.050400376],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006855069,0.00024612097,0.004587784,0.00001781285,0.000018376055,0.000019581823,0.05831909,0.000058965674,0.00003448403,0.29211465,0.64378804,0.00010957081],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0053015584,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06457136,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.64234734,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010771474,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003060451,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9524978},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2291206443","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2738736","title":"Justice LLHeureux-Dubb's Cosmopolitan Legacy: The Value of Comparative Analysis in the Evolution of the Choice of Law Rules Governing Movable Property","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Property (philosophy); Law; Economic Justice; Cosmopolitanism; Value (mathematics); Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Property value; Philosophy; Epistemology; Mathematics; Politics","score_opus":0.026903503431781425,"score_gpt":0.3193625272704075,"score_spread":0.29245902383862604,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2291206443","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9686514,0.0019166174,0.0007244832,0.003540939,0.00009170894,0.0002554863,0.000008099571,0.000005007483,0.024806254],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991561,0.00038636592,0.000019219733,0.00005167247,0.00011617807,0.0000030766512,8.1730695e-7,0.0000035887201,0.00026296155],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99759096,0.000625614,0.00038084542,0.00010469319,0.00066945935,0.0006284285],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99886847,0.00020447743,0.0005106423,0.00019638661,0.00019728311,0.000022754582],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036637525,0.000089381225,0.00023785295,0.00006440807,0.00062900176,0.000038734383,0.0005916743,0.00005778202,0.000009369768],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001189733,0.00004060179,0.00020618776,0.00087691186,0.00045209468,0.00026362314,0.00003196899,0.00080981664,0.0000010339195],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037310037,0.000108075554,0.0029283795,0.000007491529,0.00023952629,1.2303919e-7,0.017868504,0.0035674528,0.00044555994,0.9746317,0.000015074634,0.0001508032],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0025090787,0.00091341475,0.1494248,0.00026417096,0.0032794878,0.00003050859,0.35050273,0.0017377058,0.001193602,0.46768737,0.022051154,0.00040594445],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07546409,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.122006886,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5069443,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009882917,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018047458,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9306925},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2292100314","doi":"","title":"Party Autonomy and Consumer Arbitration in Conflict: A “Trojan Horse” in the Access to Justice in the E.U. ADR-Directive 2013/11?","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Arbitration; Law; Political science; Directive; European union; Charter; Economic Justice; Supreme court; Arbitration clause; Common law; Treaty; Law and economics; Sociology; Compulsory arbitration; Business; International trade","score_opus":0.05745122602695391,"score_gpt":0.3414235555081226,"score_spread":0.2839723294811687,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2292100314","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89008206,0.0004726414,0.000033803735,0.016376143,0.00034158083,0.0012368467,0.000009073171,0.00003623501,0.091411635],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99432874,0.000089233494,0.000055520777,0.0048269485,0.00023390872,0.00020949401,0.000004993463,0.0000076092356,0.00024357832],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978743,0.00078396243,0.0002949956,0.000294597,0.00040178193,0.00035034728],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99908763,0.00036167572,0.00008324878,0.00022945601,0.00009050578,0.0001474729],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002698591,0.00013640954,0.0001873576,0.00010035508,0.00026042305,0.00045099496,0.00043339215,0.0001194495,0.00005596828],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003532901,0.000097474614,0.000030866224,0.0006244208,0.00020750775,0.0007131686,0.000056116303,0.00035868012,0.00004008075],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002920854,0.00055241457,0.2934647,0.000040074272,0.000028765397,0.000072026836,0.37352413,0.00019815472,0.00010657487,0.3029273,0.021956779,0.006837009],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008319524,0.000062360035,0.19355318,0.000045198158,0.000025311101,0.000002717544,0.020794323,0.00010093661,0.00002233501,0.0020083745,0.7823615,0.00019179369],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.089872904,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.48014334,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.76040477,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017737795,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003225661,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9161877},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2293537518","doi":"","title":"Book Symposium on Will Kymlicka’s Multicultural Odysseys","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Multiculturalism; Political science; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.005800921507748182,"score_gpt":0.26581376111057164,"score_spread":0.26001283960282345,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2293537518","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.79530525,0.002500452,0.00026953703,0.091716275,0.004423974,0.0004824768,0.0000036569384,0.0002616777,0.105036706],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95920765,0.0047120065,0.000019428928,0.0009572273,0.0023079228,0.000004624819,0.0000018978344,0.000015195821,0.03277403],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972414,0.00010375267,0.0002018085,0.000181476,0.0004585177,0.0018130852],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993788,0.00005499688,0.0001247429,0.00013350666,0.00012841653,0.00017950886],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013755395,0.00013250612,0.00012969681,0.0000742859,0.0010389704,0.00016251723,0.00029634705,0.00014671023,0.00043395706],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008514249,0.00010726352,0.00013840906,0.00012479247,0.0001399981,0.00047840373,0.000017889435,0.0023038166,0.00011214289],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010931549,0.0002393902,0.00084670493,0.0000031448976,0.00014572634,0.000010232359,0.013789397,0.00001687901,0.024352977,0.92576766,0.008179759,0.026538825],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00047632618,0.0002499495,0.00047296128,0.000009651894,0.000024334797,0.00007007799,0.0023493432,0.000023449275,0.00027999294,0.00858645,0.98726404,0.0001933976],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006440133,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009300043,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9790843,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00048650455,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00125364,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999979},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2294997926","doi":"","title":"Beals v. Saldanha: Striking the Comity Balance Anew","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Comity; Jurisdiction; Balance (ability); Political science; Law; Economics; Business; Psychology","score_opus":0.029484113913379056,"score_gpt":0.27983907677708153,"score_spread":0.25035496286370246,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2294997926","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.41319332,0.0023459003,0.00014501678,0.021996854,0.0013325305,0.0005697498,0.000022206536,0.0003795876,0.56001484],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9876961,0.0004401533,0.00009735405,0.0018569138,0.0010436015,0.000015343303,0.0000023660464,0.000011977907,0.008836162],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984089,0.00024301629,0.00022222186,0.0002423667,0.00047120068,0.0004122997],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990891,0.00020695716,0.00010879851,0.00032924238,0.00007504664,0.00019084969],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00083066616,0.000121100034,0.00016532096,0.000021227774,0.0014640399,0.00026154204,0.0004084215,0.00011421523,0.0025871561],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017017964,0.00009706567,0.00009785236,0.00027513385,0.00031570313,0.0003171508,0.000056080764,0.00030014385,0.00037008442],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029382505,0.00023638547,0.047527455,0.000025348274,0.00008393378,0.000030715782,0.013227554,0.000040465766,0.00070382963,0.81148475,0.08677442,0.03983575],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023491717,0.000023196604,0.007918335,0.000023186338,0.000014307252,0.0000017606582,0.00050182384,0.00010266486,0.00007873988,0.0019085899,0.98904747,0.00014503866],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008445353,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010526498,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.902273,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009897655,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000038025762,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998359},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2296860909","doi":"","title":"Introduction - Reading Modern Law: Critical Methodologies and Sovereign Formations","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Sovereignty; Law; Modernity; Reading (process); Politics; Critical reading; Sociology; Political science; Philosophy of law; Comparative law; Law and economics","score_opus":0.09181163611098099,"score_gpt":0.39370761344481664,"score_spread":0.30189597733383566,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2296860909","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019721445,0.00024218668,0.122396134,0.020929826,0.00089145906,0.0001284438,0.0000020975622,0.00024397175,0.83544445],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9851042,0.00007796588,0.012333936,0.00019148219,0.0012434579,0.0000055593764,0.0000014347511,0.00000275509,0.001039192],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99941653,0.00012215962,0.00008539096,0.000070216134,0.0001136043,0.00019207931],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995561,0.00025211365,0.000015880976,0.000058756053,0.00004193879,0.00007517775],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009393535,0.000038684066,0.00005928075,0.00002608721,0.00054338865,0.00006947436,0.000032008615,0.000053754527,0.00034571136],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00043450863,0.000034503722,0.00001777758,0.000053447962,0.00018028979,0.0009972833,0.000021075426,0.000053833774,0.00001667744],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000023553423,0.000007700716,0.00017846399,0.0000025837635,0.000002722513,2.5133446e-8,0.007058935,8.334293e-7,0.00018056843,0.98002917,0.0010116638,0.011524995],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012859868,0.000035388864,0.003058709,0.000005918793,0.000041195897,0.000007066202,0.016161429,0.00047005215,0.0009979847,0.33045718,0.6484348,0.00020167221],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008337016,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00015207332,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96538275,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000028616925,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000010193105,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41793612},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2297321629","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2187969","title":"Equity, Unjust Enrichment and PPSA Priorities: KBA Canada, Inc. v. 3S Printers Inc.","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Equity (law); Unjust enrichment; Political science; Law; Restitution","score_opus":0.014695853790185774,"score_gpt":0.29612265113745256,"score_spread":0.2814267973472668,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2297321629","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92349,0.010409106,0.00078442076,0.008234902,0.0019648648,0.00033398933,0.000008578433,0.00006278737,0.054711338],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98816043,0.0067539657,0.000018799996,0.00026406284,0.001082932,0.000003785059,0.0000018637738,0.000011055867,0.0037031153],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963895,0.00013450929,0.00023589612,0.00012929927,0.0005712361,0.0025395683],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99932855,0.000056321558,0.00013429316,0.00009090548,0.0000842693,0.00030564764],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002936587,0.00012469359,0.00014767969,0.00006759839,0.0009108433,0.00012108592,0.00022554815,0.000076279706,0.00012636265],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005275967,0.00011760307,0.000037869147,0.000114786104,0.00011656937,0.00045523257,0.00012965944,0.0008779068,0.0000053185413],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000051493105,0.00010643583,0.034730062,0.000015641022,0.00020278382,0.0000048853767,0.013311945,0.0000023585735,0.00014970523,0.7795782,0.0026955914,0.1691509],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005589414,0.00018945221,0.009875346,0.000025440491,0.0000573224,0.00010483087,0.029475067,0.000009759061,0.000023978102,0.01593647,0.943444,0.0002993622],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.40945476,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.886104,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94074845,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00324834,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00588662,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99974906},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2298261344","doi":"","title":"Johnston and Ferguson (eds), Asia-Pacific Legal Development [Book Review]","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Australian journal of Asian law","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Asia pacific; Publishing; Project commissioning; Political science; Library science; Media studies; Sociology; Engineering; Law; Computer science; Ethnology","score_opus":0.02183914424747425,"score_gpt":0.30363742696625906,"score_spread":0.2817982827187848,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2298261344","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04307748,0.045828648,0.000119593366,0.29478678,0.0020835092,0.00072828424,0.0000048908296,0.00009039129,0.6132804],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8393789,0.0495766,0.0013914315,0.0027629489,0.001431265,0.000005119435,0.0000041660583,0.00003347539,0.10541611],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99839795,0.00013329682,0.0005154138,0.0001398373,0.0004891275,0.00032437782],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99907124,0.000018858022,0.00031879375,0.000104414474,0.00015829586,0.00032839057],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00094942003,0.00013567568,0.00028466966,0.00008673872,0.0004205886,0.00013850132,0.00019448463,0.000094580115,0.0010230141],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003106263,0.00012259942,0.000102851365,0.00019983784,0.00017872137,0.0006628981,0.000016331995,0.00025996866,0.000030350606],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017864397,0.0002708977,0.003410429,0.00024729932,0.00025553923,0.000964119,0.013411486,0.0000019039086,0.00042613116,0.046551507,0.58220947,0.3520726],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002510885,0.000112170565,0.0022936082,0.00056309946,0.00003990643,0.0002543536,0.0007793016,9.666759e-8,0.00016885062,0.00008077637,0.9953158,0.00014093853],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000239096,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005538266,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7963014,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001707376,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022421229,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998902},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2298741395","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1188","title":"Book Review: Transnational Constitutionalism: International and European Perspectives, by Nicholas Tsagourias (ed)","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Political science; Law and economics; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.01391628105875713,"score_gpt":0.27843217242413737,"score_spread":0.26451589136538023,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2298741395","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00024770366,0.13599263,0.00059222226,0.05689959,0.0005419087,0.00014564437,0.000045530698,0.000049145307,0.8054856],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.74250156,0.231769,0.0004133765,0.012449515,0.0014461379,0.0000058891646,0.000039372557,0.000021482585,0.011353691],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99820906,0.00031296554,0.00031324016,0.00021315833,0.00072952855,0.00022206159],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99911773,0.000066101326,0.00015880204,0.000077262426,0.00034164177,0.00023847888],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001005638,0.00012495673,0.00015555807,0.0000488491,0.0017752785,0.00013888013,0.00024369768,0.000055582474,0.0039863493],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008432529,0.000122268,0.0001108769,0.000073568066,0.0007086273,0.00071431807,0.000025694748,0.0003466969,0.000028853558],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000132990035,0.00007378728,0.0001070918,0.000005614402,0.000051889034,0.00004869415,0.002225551,0.0000018616439,0.00005400611,0.7140677,0.2828108,0.0005396753],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005429422,0.000025740697,0.00052397314,0.00008187287,0.000026421243,0.00056386116,0.00033830968,0.0000057302423,0.000008869545,0.0013471782,0.9963855,0.00014956799],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012075512,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001274121,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.79413193,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014583397,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017084884,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995243},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2299351235","doi":"10.1017/s0069005800009619","title":"Giving Effect to Out-of-Province Judgments in Class Actions","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Yearbook of international Law/Annuaire canadien de droit international","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Women's and Gender Studies et Recherches Féministes","funders":"","keywords":"Comity; Supreme court; Class action; Plaintiff; Law; Political science; Civil procedure; Jurisdiction; Doctrine; Damages; Settlement (finance); Legislature; Class (philosophy); Federal Rules of Civil Procedure; Business; Computer science","score_opus":0.012287917835134377,"score_gpt":0.2863827659192565,"score_spread":0.2740948480841221,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2299351235","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.28268173,0.000017809945,0.00010520164,0.008333683,0.001800999,0.00032616558,0.00024968508,0.000024231214,0.7064605],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98830557,0.000013055789,0.00020397129,0.0012173676,0.0003547404,0.00001728994,0.000032306707,0.000012267895,0.009843454],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99829406,0.000065249886,0.00040049502,0.0002691419,0.0005582847,0.00041279866],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987417,0.00010033662,0.00015145844,0.00016164247,0.000341977,0.0005029198],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00057980587,0.00013402021,0.00020105134,0.0006715723,0.00012380758,0.00006052453,0.00070586236,0.00012814824,0.00047295887],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003463546,0.00017511095,0.00010982722,0.00018463832,0.00012712958,0.00031289196,0.000027055938,0.00018601875,0.00002437119],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007694952,0.000068919915,0.023074724,0.000009638196,0.00010769119,0.000094295836,0.004507025,0.00035515998,0.00065164117,0.9542,0.0031822368,0.013671708],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00055162224,0.00019393714,0.06037103,0.0002719851,0.000014667408,0.000007691914,0.00044568625,0.00041463468,0.00069300097,0.003258193,0.93348163,0.000295934],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4297624,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.94314027,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9509418,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034777487,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012786613,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.90941924},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2302468188","doi":"","title":"Same-sex marriage harms free speech, new Ontario judge wrote in 2012","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Free speech; Psychology; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.022499170945129682,"score_gpt":0.2740959175224315,"score_spread":0.2515967465773018,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2302468188","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17204048,0.00003405438,0.0009387629,0.008084262,0.0006899063,0.00023712715,0.0000014407104,0.00011098761,0.817863],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.36151436,0.000043874894,0.0020413501,0.0015219315,0.0011857767,0.0000063070916,0.000005078072,0.000014949315,0.6336664],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99886835,0.00008588899,0.00018823819,0.00021161977,0.00031550505,0.00033040656],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993893,0.00008277189,0.000047759462,0.00026536186,0.00002326371,0.00019155996],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000781944,0.00009656019,0.0001521266,0.00007036588,0.00016927643,0.0001004219,0.00029799776,0.00012056844,0.0118794],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011990316,0.00008977286,0.00006170685,0.00015209791,0.000066645174,0.00032452162,0.00006637613,0.00016932526,0.0003289921],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000053298867,0.00018141011,0.10303176,0.000008230178,0.000028420607,0.000015540541,0.06974443,0.000008803613,0.00057372835,0.1458168,0.30029652,0.38024107],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00046164377,0.00003273258,0.046223033,0.000010432851,0.000005307049,4.0803872e-7,0.0003785851,0.000020794287,0.00012338857,0.009217391,0.94339037,0.00013593884],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.774521,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96369714,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6430938,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019553775,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023640995,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98902386},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2303337045","doi":"","title":"Section 15(1) at the Supreme Court of Canada 2001.","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Section (typography); Supreme court; Law; Political science; History; Business","score_opus":0.020258215336807002,"score_gpt":0.24963841351475874,"score_spread":0.22938019817795174,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2303337045","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5384279,0.000654439,0.000010615928,0.011749674,0.00150855,0.00024895853,0.00002341945,0.00005939377,0.4473171],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9416805,0.0001745267,0.000016015128,0.0006750289,0.0006470299,0.000008753061,0.0000030249432,0.000008215469,0.056786925],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998698,0.00012394019,0.0001863762,0.00015436913,0.0005275535,0.00030975055],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993397,0.00008539968,0.00009428001,0.00022334653,0.000104443825,0.00015280355],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00046842094,0.00008217944,0.00011563058,0.000016071126,0.00088724494,0.000044189546,0.00019629156,0.000076040276,0.008974539],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008244627,0.000067172135,0.000057530797,0.00018849732,0.0001811768,0.00014814944,0.000036889916,0.00014408365,0.00006559595],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026940384,0.00008077999,0.010359666,0.000015544048,0.000055121418,0.000008673151,0.0040585664,0.00011993563,0.0013649166,0.034807943,0.9459664,0.0031354849],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001490828,0.00002200399,0.0044788956,0.00000977374,0.0000120076365,0.0000016965325,0.0004814652,0.00008176919,0.00043452074,0.00012794619,0.99411374,0.000087094406],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.87899274,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98991853,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.40325263,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00033011395,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016345135,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9919314},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2307180944","doi":"","title":"Review of the New Ontario Limitations Regime: Exposition and Analysis","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Exposition (narrative); Law and economics; Economics; Political science; Art; Literature","score_opus":0.029094567732955556,"score_gpt":0.2823597940473716,"score_spread":0.25326522631441606,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2307180944","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.053985134,0.01155764,0.0022303488,0.041667707,0.00012694945,0.000368153,0.000002109773,0.000039357325,0.8900226],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8919827,0.010944602,0.0009143672,0.0014558772,0.00014083859,0.0000055000955,0.000012461756,0.0000029954087,0.09454067],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996485,0.000039716182,0.000099720404,0.000054396005,0.00011161946,0.00004600987],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997742,0.000033133743,0.00005259197,0.000074265794,0.00004580811,0.00001998127],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00016692342,0.000023293935,0.00006524693,0.000024087,0.00015562226,0.0000147253495,0.000040719817,0.000018100633,0.00030976898],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002039757,0.00001621802,0.00006646724,0.0003659407,0.00004583283,0.000064980544,0.000007954787,0.000022997841,0.0000013267503],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000075294474,0.00012868589,0.11210414,0.00018148625,0.00026072442,3.8803046e-7,0.020001719,0.000023352726,0.00030974802,0.61667204,0.18871038,0.061599813],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000051575025,0.000008750941,0.24431008,0.00015102961,0.0003442376,1.3332944e-7,0.00016957505,0.0000063433326,0.000035816436,0.0016348913,0.75324845,0.00003909009],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.30486444,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.717841,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83799756,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000032052227,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009762624,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.69976455},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2310673271","doi":"","title":"The Impact of 'Stateless Law' on Legal Pedagogy","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Stateless protocol; Law; Political science; Legal education; Sociology; Computer science; State (computer science)","score_opus":0.024473032417540005,"score_gpt":0.37721652258800714,"score_spread":0.35274349017046713,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2310673271","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8710993,0.0013572404,0.00019963073,0.0033280242,0.00039506366,0.00009997291,0.0000016761953,0.000021165555,0.1234979],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9941013,0.002148947,0.0000020420437,0.00002397706,0.0005167603,0.0000011095608,4.2994918e-7,0.000007269635,0.0031981515],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979553,0.00019761882,0.00017507737,0.00007502646,0.00039989987,0.0011970728],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99938357,0.00007893017,0.0001429771,0.000096568256,0.00017131565,0.00012661066],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033086506,0.00007241069,0.000105462386,0.000034439367,0.0006005243,0.00009705769,0.00024771068,0.00004960514,0.000018633875],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000082454455,0.000044882698,0.0001347717,0.00011564685,0.000175247,0.00016310207,0.000012796194,0.0007222896,0.00001450629],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011991924,0.00003641589,0.00039440437,2.4833793e-7,0.0000601206,0.0000013402957,0.00246749,0.00005924817,0.000031912346,0.9664216,0.00032268485,0.030084632],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014024463,0.002902735,0.0015363755,0.000018318346,0.0000351653,0.00012110096,0.03701905,0.000068095505,0.000104243096,0.46218482,0.49436423,0.00024342112],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017789254,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.042669453,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.50423676,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009901902,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0056683184,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99996865},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2313866240","doi":"10.1177/0003603x1305800205","title":"Survey of International Jurisdictions Providing for Judicial Merger Prohibition Decisions","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Antitrust Bulletin","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Commission; Agency (philosophy); Database transaction; Judicial review; Political science; Intervention (counseling); Business; Law; European commission; Public administration; Law and economics; Economics; European union; International trade; Sociology","score_opus":0.04888812493038976,"score_gpt":0.3240987415475461,"score_spread":0.27521061661715635,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2313866240","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.83859545,0.00018716445,0.0060555195,0.06875633,0.0029629713,0.0026167785,0.00015879392,0.00016323356,0.08050375],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99670553,0.00017400355,0.00030941117,0.00015835465,0.00041277718,0.00009916945,0.000029994158,0.000009646422,0.0021011338],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989703,0.00015401529,0.00025397094,0.00013739649,0.0003019799,0.00018232892],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987069,0.00047245735,0.00013990376,0.00013298196,0.00050231436,0.00004544905],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013048761,0.00006774308,0.000109108536,0.00006842433,0.00069234584,0.00007893991,0.00024693058,0.00006395545,0.0019625577],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00085684785,0.000052195737,0.000081088765,0.00018715221,0.00015669053,0.000097695425,0.000042503547,0.000080147394,0.00013687008],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00032907657,0.00079240825,0.06409312,0.000025722615,0.00030378057,0.0000010852144,0.02208868,0.00017876601,0.008505891,0.16112088,0.65931296,0.08324763],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029095946,0.00004937841,0.16207492,0.000036924084,0.000025185047,4.683655e-7,0.00064196746,0.00033922933,0.0002806615,0.0010526199,0.8350996,0.0001081187],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0217296,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002710776,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1757866,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003427855,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000894626,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99894977},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2319425583","doi":"10.3917/empa.085.0010","title":"Introduction","year":2012,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Empan","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Lockheed Martin (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.0262513695355356,"score_gpt":0.30853941128298384,"score_spread":0.28228804174744826,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2319425583","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.44023284,0.014141653,0.0001958688,0.21592279,0.035113227,0.00015125009,0.000004779822,0.0001066599,0.29413092],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7755303,0.00039046086,0.00008832505,0.00019720118,0.035231087,0.0000027404983,0.0000033054614,0.000006711837,0.18854992],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99915385,0.000113426104,0.000105396306,0.00009927163,0.00017836987,0.00034970514],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99963903,0.000017786584,0.000044960856,0.00010787873,0.000031496522,0.00015882023],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005193003,0.00006551282,0.00007418084,0.000025801053,0.00027380756,0.000031652053,0.000059680402,0.000096780306,0.009140967],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000034569774,0.000070546404,0.000052882253,0.00022271951,0.00017998114,0.0005192959,0.00001613146,0.00010207401,0.0024972977],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000064888072,0.00019442126,0.009266015,0.000012341449,0.000023246736,4.1034102e-7,0.047412325,0.000002218526,0.00013682741,0.3577067,0.27631637,0.30892265],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000055749788,0.000022322141,0.021737836,0.000005739226,0.000023063867,0.0000027440844,0.0013947656,0.000007255921,0.00009346306,0.0003237291,0.9762491,0.00008425154],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015647208,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00016389295,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6999327,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010240074,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002790928,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9982794},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2320857469","doi":"","title":"Claude Emanuelli. Droit international privé québécois","year":2007,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue internationale de droit comparé","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law and economics; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.023677426058207576,"score_gpt":0.29831138795038836,"score_spread":0.2746339618921808,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2320857469","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5533377,0.0048412187,0.03139213,0.01844717,0.012139231,0.00042276332,0.00010882913,0.00018952256,0.37912145],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8374785,0.002256342,0.0011887065,0.0008753478,0.00589774,0.000018404693,0.000102574166,0.000043010128,0.15213937],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99683,0.00010964025,0.0008559733,0.0005475673,0.000918263,0.0007385981],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99782693,0.0005137991,0.0004595146,0.00032287295,0.0004960145,0.00038086157],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016555878,0.00028134047,0.00035995117,0.00033429917,0.00030108073,0.00022844237,0.0010504713,0.00031608643,0.0032301035],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021876063,0.00040968717,0.00036679668,0.0004009751,0.00041341854,0.00056192547,0.00013956455,0.000525781,0.001110237],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000076102435,0.00051453046,0.028811038,0.00005758705,0.00029653628,0.00015742719,0.007819373,0.0002751249,0.00020005407,0.81139153,0.0040388983,0.14636178],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00054042164,0.000059898026,0.048740808,0.00034918272,0.0000624101,0.0001313147,0.0010068703,0.004613411,0.00021131139,0.028729212,0.91515285,0.00040233854],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014303284,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.042958718,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9111139,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002384565,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00029001408,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998355},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2332475208","doi":"10.1093/ulr/5.3.633-b","title":"Peter Kaye (ed.), European Case Law on the Judgments Convention, John Wiley &amp; Sons, Chichester/New York/Weinheim/Brisbane/Singapore/Toronto, 1998, pp. L + 964, ISBN 0-471-94089-5.","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Uniform Law Review","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Convention; Law; History; Political science","score_opus":0.04607043350071265,"score_gpt":0.2981543683563499,"score_spread":0.25208393485563724,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2332475208","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0031501066,0.10514996,0.000029393845,0.010578016,0.00077311473,0.0018577009,0.00005527566,0.00032094517,0.8780855],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.20272285,0.66215134,0.0006206787,0.053122927,0.00401994,0.0001321582,0.0003759378,0.00025950623,0.07659465],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99624157,0.0008732918,0.00084499887,0.00056823035,0.00075709267,0.0007148359],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99810886,0.00013264827,0.00036267607,0.00088352524,0.00009568671,0.00041657413],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.002525666,0.00042487233,0.00053688337,0.000022192793,0.0016944899,0.00034739857,0.00060190493,0.00013755055,0.0076182703],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000060481376,0.00031727433,0.00041754375,0.00026073176,0.00037489002,0.0005493341,0.00007606149,0.00038729538,0.0032431649],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008062584,0.00046375484,0.00009977678,0.00085934135,0.00028917685,0.00039494378,0.0076132687,0.000005334691,0.000016256216,0.3684542,0.29977664,0.3219467],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003806348,0.000087377084,0.000037726943,0.0025680028,0.00020196021,0.00012924537,0.00012457673,0.0000034406662,0.000008632019,0.00033461096,0.99573517,0.0003886087],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04212015,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05882921,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.80149084,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026964306,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013722114,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99992794},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2332491557","doi":"10.1093/tandt/ttt142","title":"'Absolute discretion' in the Singapore Court of Appeal; substance, form, and the company; Fideicomisa; FATCA, the ugly American; French trust disease arrives in Argentina; Cyprus raises its game; Jersey tries to improve its firewall, but must try harder; a Swiss dog seems unlikely to raise its leg; some interesting New Zealand trust possibilities; and Humpty-Dumpty and the split in the Supreme Court in Lehman Brothers","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Trusts & Trustees","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Discretion; Law; Absolute (philosophy); Political science; Law and economics; Business; Sociology; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.02129955411259839,"score_gpt":0.28187587895680133,"score_spread":0.26057632484420296,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2332491557","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9556243,0.0025896444,0.0000091538195,0.036083054,0.00015312043,0.0049799536,0.00010380868,0.000033752487,0.00042321972],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996063,0.0010425567,0.000019132574,0.0009833735,0.00019779276,0.0005121695,0.000007931342,0.00003419645,0.0011398534],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9952215,0.0013167416,0.0010665003,0.0007231487,0.0007620841,0.0009100501],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99657327,0.0019602797,0.0004679592,0.00058593997,0.00012927206,0.00028328376],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033252651,0.00052905886,0.0008837872,0.00027918606,0.0007053829,0.0007737959,0.001046274,0.00013611563,0.00006709395],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007838236,0.00027248423,0.00015352078,0.0008971155,0.002062515,0.00082817266,0.00018587192,0.00066600717,0.0000035194378],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0026849674,0.00028408322,0.15302415,0.00020231406,0.00008941236,0.00001813295,0.8263172,0.00022631754,0.0002063414,0.0062437854,0.0011929668,0.009510352],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0067137117,0.00018037099,0.83390194,0.00045267353,0.000091138485,0.000008287832,0.14777483,0.0035222634,0.000031727744,0.002916723,0.003928186,0.00047811918],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.049073964,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09116731,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6808778,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001234199,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002547774,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99997276},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2333516913","doi":"10.1093/cjcl/cxv003","title":"Exploring a Right to Physician-Assisted Suicide in Singapore","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Chinese Journal of Comparative Law","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Law; Human rights; Constitution; Legislature; Political science; Directive; Common law","score_opus":0.2508070739227968,"score_gpt":0.40914720696840434,"score_spread":0.15834013304560757,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2333516913","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92110825,0.00014991642,0.00010224429,0.0050436747,0.00042633337,0.00011599483,7.7527136e-7,0.000009935451,0.07304289],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99860716,0.00001275471,0.00010230738,0.0004145825,0.0006927074,0.000003902313,3.0328187e-7,0.00000485192,0.0001614571],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99867266,0.000313271,0.00031370952,0.00007176353,0.0004506238,0.0001779468],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990582,0.00017574025,0.0002102965,0.000099733035,0.00029378495,0.00016228159],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012637408,0.00010119004,0.00029829648,0.000083618375,0.00022846766,0.00007804747,0.00028412952,0.000020644182,0.000015142802],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000047915255,0.00005683812,0.00008439376,0.0005835381,0.00014594597,0.00055214786,0.000030740728,0.00021600383,0.000017367158],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010998377,0.00060174294,0.0090667615,0.00000832002,0.00015744,0.00011974522,0.7116214,0.0034629353,0.0045776535,0.26009646,0.0033001124,0.005887552],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004001686,0.0010690484,0.23377338,0.00064026506,0.00009117931,0.00005200837,0.052434403,0.00037385995,0.0032814224,0.10152172,0.60201675,0.00074427284],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010072213,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008441235,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.659187,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014243406,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000117116215,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47104073},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2334493510","doi":"","title":"The Puzzle of Family Law Pluralism","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Scrutiny; Pluralism (philosophy); Counterintuitive; Law and economics; Autonomy; Family law; Status quo; Law; Cohabitation; Choice of law; Political science; Sociology; Economics; Conflict of laws; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02165747510458757,"score_gpt":0.28595957104838765,"score_spread":0.26430209594380005,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2334493510","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3159399,0.0008324934,0.000061638675,0.017851813,0.0012422209,0.0002904773,0.000022599996,0.00013867566,0.6636202],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9838381,0.00040928522,0.000045174675,0.0006594302,0.00046781314,0.000013864123,7.7535213e-7,0.000009818949,0.014555751],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99875057,0.00014250513,0.0002234378,0.00016416937,0.00040991086,0.00030940693],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990838,0.00025170378,0.00010366779,0.00029265558,0.00012296427,0.00014517318],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007149061,0.00008629847,0.00012534499,0.000014468891,0.0010057339,0.00009165434,0.0003445515,0.00009087716,0.0003000938],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001058857,0.000050035454,0.000098282806,0.00012563707,0.00068341446,0.00029490175,0.000051130613,0.00008658638,0.00022857348],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014679034,0.000015807522,0.0005248551,0.0000017691874,0.0000128852,0.0000011372832,0.0006837474,2.1888033e-7,0.0036031487,0.98482025,0.0030847585,0.007236744],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025402254,0.000026276568,0.002353281,0.000028472037,0.000008224488,2.9018653e-7,0.00044992263,5.270551e-7,0.0012702111,0.008473447,0.9870464,0.00008893016],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022364961,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.037629712,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98396164,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006027951,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006915234,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9841452},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W233525522","doi":"","title":"THE RECOGNITION OF FOREIGN JUDGMENTS IN QUEBEC - THE MIRROR CRACK'D?","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Political science; Psychology","score_opus":0.027224442048776908,"score_gpt":0.2752400403669361,"score_spread":0.2480155983181592,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W233525522","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9120141,0.0039612297,0.00015007087,0.01610905,0.0003794042,0.0003574086,0.0000018156708,0.000019050212,0.06700782],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9812264,0.0110154245,0.000005877548,0.00006735957,0.00014704016,0.0000062006498,4.7271928e-7,0.0000053582803,0.007525888],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982578,0.00022606585,0.00022647933,0.000072182585,0.00031306778,0.0009043815],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995289,0.00012570021,0.00015913408,0.000082804894,0.00007201269,0.000031440362],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026651374,0.000057205274,0.00007319219,0.00004191432,0.0007679987,0.00007542109,0.00023914482,0.00004946281,0.00013918837],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010017839,0.00003440721,0.00007370826,0.00020450455,0.00014301954,0.00018655826,0.00001167421,0.0006560068,0.000022616401],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000058732436,0.00012518757,0.0032161374,0.0000023085277,0.000076571996,0.0000015990174,0.011081764,0.0000020152995,0.0001333197,0.2503756,0.00061178126,0.734315],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012362894,0.00034876307,0.008402737,0.00006128033,0.000054698878,0.00003575515,0.06256518,0.00019991603,0.00012384294,0.6581104,0.2686313,0.00022985169],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02763595,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5133517,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.73408514,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00050871127,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00041356037,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9788391},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2336068712","doi":"","title":"Crown Copyright and Copyright Reform in Canada","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Notice; Copyright Act; Obligation; Crown (dentistry); Business; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Copyright law; Intellectual property; Economics","score_opus":0.005158111713760381,"score_gpt":0.24017509259749034,"score_spread":0.23501698088372996,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2336068712","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9338529,0.003494077,0.00006824956,0.013621862,0.0002525687,0.00010676766,0.0000018476801,0.000014210288,0.04858753],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9891395,0.0071266675,0.000017842382,0.00022195424,0.00049533584,0.0000017775998,8.0733145e-7,0.0000067525452,0.002989394],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99787235,0.00006695807,0.00020614796,0.00011818631,0.00031781424,0.0014185256],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99966305,0.000024318948,0.00007987934,0.000062492654,0.000045557812,0.0001246749],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012489334,0.00008209797,0.00011905907,0.00006631684,0.0004692944,0.000062330604,0.00014840825,0.000052846153,0.00021154215],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000016083502,0.000069415095,0.000027200564,0.00015272919,0.00006482643,0.00029059692,0.00001363849,0.0008280736,0.000006607038],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014070992,0.00007973792,0.0386223,0.0000053274052,0.00008913477,0.000026788886,0.006351476,0.000020117866,0.00009117474,0.67916876,0.0019430834,0.2734614],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00083895685,0.000088607114,0.012268185,0.000021305043,0.000014334518,0.000103937855,0.011882789,0.00013720921,0.00006294546,0.023484569,0.9508645,0.00023265253],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9422371,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9995805,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94892144,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009525477,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010797466,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9948104},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2337479390","doi":"","title":"« Résumé de l’affaire « Association pour l’accès à l’avortement c. Procureur général du Québec » » (2006 QCCS 4694)","year":2016,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Medicine; Philosophy","score_opus":0.016477024676488684,"score_gpt":0.26012798053638964,"score_spread":0.24365095585990096,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2337479390","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0986128,0.0019320097,0.0046218983,0.5371829,0.002918186,0.00064665894,0.000058289555,0.0003476334,0.35367963],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6561022,0.001306647,0.000247629,0.0007967036,0.002295207,0.00003754138,0.000003476916,0.000026714748,0.3391839],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99684006,0.00036091643,0.0005353892,0.0004752537,0.0007470282,0.0010413554],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99830776,0.0003427409,0.00039256184,0.000242229,0.00034498816,0.00036972782],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016615066,0.00028463476,0.00030624,0.00007983464,0.00067670457,0.00017069845,0.00034251256,0.00043057054,0.007699267],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00044248588,0.00023567447,0.0002470001,0.0003344499,0.00019892871,0.00075318094,0.00008821997,0.00018806654,0.0015886752],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030652383,0.0005503306,0.3389166,0.000040253664,0.00019540961,0.000009264783,0.0059450385,0.0000031275185,0.0012699967,0.17875837,0.23026732,0.24401367],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008430734,0.00012674567,0.025590306,0.00011637311,0.00012397843,0.000002698891,0.0010443974,0.00018976038,0.00040117046,0.0036360868,0.967543,0.00038239747],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.14006662,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.19374664,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7372757,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037908729,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019215333,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991887},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2338685098","doi":"10.7202/1035848ar","title":"Cameroon: The Law across the Bridge: Twenty Years (1972-1992) of Confusion","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Law; Confusion; Political science; Civil law (Civil law); Common law; Comparative law; Public law; Psychology","score_opus":0.02109000016965107,"score_gpt":0.2922200964594448,"score_spread":0.27113009628979373,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2338685098","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9463408,0.0001272988,0.00015257813,0.012617556,0.00035368477,0.00026986713,0.000037309004,0.00004420072,0.04005672],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9951392,0.00041743543,0.000010161078,0.00039708358,0.00048677478,0.000012332904,0.0000014523683,0.000009492082,0.0035260615],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989514,0.00014146556,0.00018660231,0.00015180849,0.00025281252,0.00031595744],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991987,0.00021973305,0.00013370646,0.00032075043,0.000060141687,0.00006699033],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010097852,0.000058557154,0.00012760278,0.000011117171,0.00047350247,0.000053904012,0.0003803836,0.000084294494,0.00017045546],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008083767,0.00004223502,0.00011608226,0.0001587478,0.000635009,0.00010956328,0.0000722058,0.00010114996,0.000058520818],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007873793,0.0001139793,0.0165682,0.00003667505,0.00007242912,0.000023398403,0.071616784,0.00000839321,0.007376908,0.6065168,0.0057144756,0.29187325],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005339365,0.000071054805,0.12990583,0.00013475551,0.000038564067,0.000015202141,0.002242476,0.000021478025,0.001217592,0.012429756,0.8531927,0.00019665538],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007012035,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0059636845,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8474782,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000087885324,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000060247763,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99960035},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2339487206","doi":"","title":"Book Review of 'Legal Issues in Electronic Commerce, 2nd Edition'","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Cyberspace; Jurisdiction; Mainstream; Subject (documents); Work (physics); Political science; Field (mathematics); Engineering ethics; Public relations; Sociology; Law; Engineering; Computer science; The Internet; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.005614674076155714,"score_gpt":0.28873872352537794,"score_spread":0.2831240494492222,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2339487206","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009245,0.92438227,0.0003579686,0.032388363,0.00028792422,0.0003146157,0.00000294806,0.000040079693,0.03298082],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.18720272,0.7923434,0.000009541589,0.0019756795,0.0013449012,0.000008185933,0.0000090518015,0.000015253023,0.017091298],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968732,0.00026618745,0.0004700997,0.00014570465,0.00048565038,0.0017591702],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999406,0.000049779697,0.00024355084,0.00011724745,0.0001393576,0.0000440573],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003122283,0.00011864036,0.00027231142,0.00013404807,0.00028793086,0.000039376067,0.00025640114,0.00008255515,0.00081496243],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005963447,0.00011596783,0.00014442505,0.00037107238,0.00012284273,0.0004120344,0.00001630664,0.0011739809,0.000014672701],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026961323,0.00015890757,0.00089837506,0.00008894004,0.0000383629,0.0000033760211,0.00028396831,0.0000044395765,0.0000696245,0.89297944,0.09752451,0.007923106],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003176964,0.00015770322,0.0007147315,0.0004546943,0.00002591888,0.00003241012,0.00037984474,0.0000034592947,0.000026138518,0.048900604,0.948867,0.000119783945],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006066224,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.025417397,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8513425,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011089918,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025810604,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9923662},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2340757021","doi":"10.5539/jpl.v9n2p232","title":"Study on English and French Law","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Politics and Law","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Honesty; Statute; Bad faith; Political science; Good faith; Faith; Fair dealing; Negotiation; Seriousness; Transparency (behavior); Law and economics; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.023745948562610714,"score_gpt":0.31083573832370504,"score_spread":0.28708978976109434,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2340757021","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8788132,0.00007874687,0.0000063523717,0.0018789921,0.0003150535,0.000043536787,0.0000032389285,0.0000048770494,0.11885598],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981651,0.00009903156,0.000012537302,0.00033574196,0.0007264385,2.6541213e-7,2.5214298e-8,0.0000028391964,0.00065806176],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994332,0.000056030396,0.0001415893,0.00005149683,0.00019450088,0.00012316408],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995016,0.0001125457,0.00007706296,0.00004193557,0.00012778818,0.00013909674],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00041840217,0.00004196201,0.00009517992,0.000024721448,0.00023412974,0.00006757233,0.000045729837,0.000032732038,0.00002557081],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000051766612,0.000026061465,0.000023485381,0.00002188465,0.00018518721,0.00012271163,0.000012752403,0.000059691974,8.014562e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002978878,0.000063737236,0.003709868,0.0000010928145,0.000013515322,0.000008815402,0.010115069,1.937686e-8,0.000022697774,0.98477364,0.00021787704,0.0010706658],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008308298,0.0007794424,0.02466834,0.000046773832,0.000032958287,0.0000060484276,0.004981226,2.2135505e-7,0.000058194168,0.0193852,0.9491325,0.00007824086],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015863783,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012730889,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9653885,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002218845,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000027620881,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.239814},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2341203479","doi":"","title":"Displacing the ‘Conjugal Family’ in Legal Policy: A Progressive Move?","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research Portal (Queen's University Belfast)","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Centrality; Jurisprudence; Family law; Domestic relations; Political science; Law; Sociology; Gender studies; Criminology","score_opus":0.028378719095366055,"score_gpt":0.33979014011753006,"score_spread":0.311411421022164,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2341203479","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.74369407,0.000077582175,0.000017658742,0.016813733,0.00015254115,0.00061922375,0.000018902658,0.000071404975,0.23853488],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9857424,0.00018133354,0.000023261047,0.00006970715,0.0006574179,0.000003934908,0.000007016835,0.000011639301,0.013303325],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99649173,0.0007772228,0.00015341556,0.00026042105,0.0011436023,0.0011736351],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988092,0.00025440572,0.00007534172,0.0002521655,0.00022080205,0.00038808573],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023148458,0.00012903793,0.00016479673,0.0004494343,0.0015447929,0.00013018,0.000511884,0.00015017345,0.00023333149],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00026607284,0.00011421705,0.00010257672,0.0014171029,0.0009294948,0.0010624358,0.0002997872,0.0007066107,0.0000661498],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002008481,0.00039180162,0.10423719,0.00002277662,0.00006496873,0.0004480915,0.030792292,0.000010974684,0.00012728538,0.8508104,0.006318837,0.0065745106],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005569642,0.00008011769,0.2131649,0.00005749825,0.00001201057,0.000003516244,0.049597323,0.000019794163,0.000048335714,0.00029305503,0.7359506,0.0002158851],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08911905,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001971942,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8505174,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004718143,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00087436434,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997551},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2341594630","doi":"","title":"Out of Bounds: Can a Court Sit Outside its Home Jurisdiction?","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University; Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Jurisdiction; Supreme court; Law; Original jurisdiction; Political science; High Court","score_opus":0.011611840874610906,"score_gpt":0.27361274921057477,"score_spread":0.26200090833596384,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2341594630","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9250568,0.0032135167,0.0019484387,0.023396928,0.0018526207,0.00051943184,0.000008520517,0.0001285278,0.04387521],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9842483,0.004656081,0.000018094373,0.00011014878,0.0008594715,0.000009635738,0.0000017113691,0.000016206093,0.010080385],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970872,0.00014643291,0.00036151792,0.0001626391,0.000571403,0.0016708409],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99902475,0.000049640166,0.0002672397,0.00012752047,0.00035175454,0.0001791111],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016751502,0.00012737382,0.00021363496,0.00013858118,0.0006759334,0.00014315327,0.00029410276,0.00011900286,0.0006043155],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006852311,0.000119516146,0.00015394118,0.00020108433,0.0001348902,0.00040756067,0.00002507796,0.00094003946,0.00013959726],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000118154356,0.00054036046,0.02845515,0.000025483705,0.0009326133,0.000009285005,0.063570775,0.00003884187,0.0050289324,0.7512165,0.0071198936,0.14294401],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0029322095,0.0015958836,0.039602377,0.00013370828,0.00029131904,0.00016329282,0.058858953,0.00020830565,0.00058376085,0.48520762,0.40932244,0.001100143],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0045683617,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.030875273,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.40220255,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000946933,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003036713,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9868087},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2342941036","doi":"","title":"Canadian Supreme Court to rule in territoriality principle","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Territoriality; Supreme court; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.022534259832589096,"score_gpt":0.3145621408360887,"score_spread":0.2920278810034996,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2342941036","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.70344466,0.0000030876852,0.00006198705,0.050916668,0.0014660291,0.0001838675,0.000010770079,0.000044664914,0.24386825],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98467296,0.0000058012856,0.000076690296,0.00030461382,0.00071450695,0.000008232622,4.798149e-7,0.0000029150895,0.01421377],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993162,0.000048508664,0.00009709192,0.00011805671,0.0001620026,0.0002581023],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995377,0.00002920968,0.000010577394,0.000098038945,0.00003754602,0.0002868956],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00055209635,0.000037969316,0.000058498073,0.00006547585,0.00013619404,0.00003362203,0.00011366672,0.000054529482,0.0013402614],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010533374,0.000028113003,0.000017897783,0.00011591654,0.000025742214,0.000108963024,0.0000146353705,0.000024468838,0.00016568901],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021091382,0.00005351101,0.74953204,0.0000026085318,0.000007565206,0.000009170826,0.011288496,0.0000010985254,0.0014561025,0.16550256,0.025057059,0.047068708],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009796577,0.000007514022,0.121026315,0.000006391408,6.3019365e-7,4.8135323e-8,0.00014344053,5.4378864e-7,0.0000868141,0.0008591555,0.8777179,0.000053270494],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.92359793,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9915555,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85266083,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00053016626,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00039182248,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99957263},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2345294130","doi":"","title":"Not Just the Government's Lawyer: The Attorney General as Defender of the Rule of Law","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Constitutionality; Charter; Political science; Legislation; Statutory law; Cabinet (room); Possession (linguistics); Duty; Legislature; Supreme court; Government (linguistics); Common law; Engineering","score_opus":0.023866231487865847,"score_gpt":0.2761670556046301,"score_spread":0.25230082411676424,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2345294130","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90911263,0.0009957107,0.000045991444,0.014949435,0.00038128198,0.00015561722,0.000004674362,0.000008214764,0.07434645],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9898918,0.0026439496,0.0000047630842,0.0005626292,0.00052171684,0.0000025903726,1.760652e-7,0.000008235856,0.006364093],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977447,0.00025825104,0.00024175878,0.00008973577,0.0008855851,0.0007799924],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99930984,0.000091649454,0.00027090168,0.00020816541,0.000081020786,0.00003842896],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018399421,0.00008359823,0.000116629584,0.0000083207715,0.0014081278,0.000026170403,0.00057906634,0.00005873794,0.00009078239],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005393006,0.000040539857,0.00020175276,0.00014077307,0.0006070323,0.00010600303,0.000054641307,0.00074848917,0.0000059702456],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030916814,0.000039460054,0.0018483546,0.000001152623,0.0000838619,4.2065517e-7,0.0075344252,0.000024116214,0.000704204,0.98793566,0.0002752042,0.0015222402],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009783653,0.0003009525,0.029080324,0.000025379393,0.00018263502,0.00027048655,0.019984014,0.000040568015,0.003765703,0.05942805,0.8857085,0.00023500455],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004755934,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009204701,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92850757,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00038945844,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012518981,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998919},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2349165180","doi":"","title":"Research on the Relief System within Marriage","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of China Women's University","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Autonomy; Minor (academic); Law; Harmonious Society; Political science; Economics; China","score_opus":0.05990768823350765,"score_gpt":0.29113031401633077,"score_spread":0.23122262578282313,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2349165180","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7093266,0.000006746103,0.000019341333,0.0012855207,0.00031092402,0.00006152029,0.0000010070885,0.000011834648,0.2889765],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9947588,0.0000604255,0.000034137116,0.0000336129,0.00022990431,1.07166045e-7,4.671326e-8,0.0000036635986,0.0048793172],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.998173,0.0007193775,0.00013732498,0.00007912316,0.0006637428,0.00022741481],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991132,0.00015199641,0.00021251584,0.00013270606,0.00023397394,0.00015560158],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004929763,0.0000537873,0.00011695413,0.00019963921,0.0010273339,0.00003639737,0.00045476313,0.000064007785,0.00036389168],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000807438,0.000038060287,0.00007301623,0.00039941765,0.00022207847,0.000234424,0.00005011506,0.00046999412,0.00002588737],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006723277,0.0001575909,0.0010587109,0.000013840221,0.00007091607,0.00027845666,0.19507205,0.000007380554,0.00005901494,0.79808,0.0038524142,0.0006772543],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00086030527,0.0011799355,0.04194153,0.00020013895,0.00003151057,0.000020141535,0.5123484,0.000019196534,0.00015076826,0.004043176,0.43903208,0.0001728374],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00063806085,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00007881898,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.79403687,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006761356,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023249499,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.79015255},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2359522463","doi":"","title":"Examination and Specific Utilization on Some Clauses Related to See Law","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Seed","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Law and economics; Political science; Economics","score_opus":0.038737816437472955,"score_gpt":0.31250040295890136,"score_spread":0.2737625865214284,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2359522463","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.85570824,0.000092122755,0.00003866289,0.0033047514,0.0002246136,0.0002056676,0.0000013407929,0.00011382792,0.14031076],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99672693,0.00014575064,0.00002870888,0.00062601385,0.00009019786,0.0000015642988,0.000006225678,0.0000035955798,0.002371041],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99941915,0.000065287764,0.000091719136,0.00013284557,0.00017920545,0.00011179864],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997717,0.000028827551,0.000028370661,0.00006735778,0.00004107973,0.000062674284],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00027359178,0.000049199894,0.00005709609,0.000056195455,0.00027944762,0.000066018925,0.000041098257,0.000066079716,0.000043333697],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000026733023,0.000050127204,0.000013139875,0.00018060578,0.000041297502,0.00023524444,0.0000051023917,0.00004511082,0.000060727005],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014650777,0.00003707239,0.00045014685,0.0000011080476,0.0000024579176,0.0000012160253,0.009559576,0.000008627538,0.0025674708,0.94519776,0.00017825924,0.041981634],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024363615,0.00019867072,0.74012953,0.000022084201,0.0000052724795,3.4987028e-7,0.00080321083,0.000041681593,0.00058375864,0.015474535,0.24238472,0.00011256182],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001483824,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00018798784,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92972326,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004583888,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000010588589,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21493132},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2362438271","doi":"","title":"A Study on Canada's System of Recognizing and Enforcing Foreign Judgement","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Contemporary Legal Science","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Judgement; Enforcement; Law; Conflict of laws; Political science; Business; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.041921985797887994,"score_gpt":0.299298137988939,"score_spread":0.25737615219105103,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2362438271","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6543243,0.00008236967,0.000020327088,0.00061517156,0.00017657073,0.00034320488,0.0000022572647,0.00002459858,0.34441122],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991935,0.0000030668336,0.000045097855,0.000112358524,0.00012166181,0.000009143956,2.6231803e-7,0.0000034412249,0.0005114645],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984488,0.00006786817,0.0002453924,0.00026017634,0.0007407513,0.00023699786],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993947,0.00006336461,0.00012782172,0.00014140051,0.00011832074,0.00015438224],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018061842,0.00007928589,0.0001412275,0.000089844885,0.00069383584,0.00010259474,0.0002449815,0.000020785035,0.0000091048905],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009262092,0.00007174852,0.000018938754,0.00038454312,0.0002799863,0.0005601544,0.00006025696,0.000070984475,0.0000017009681],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020466959,0.0005579035,0.22843045,0.00010496461,0.000072774645,0.00014177107,0.08532888,0.00010860769,0.0034353544,0.5175319,0.004754731,0.15932804],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020933577,0.0011731565,0.12840836,0.0004917708,0.00003589729,0.000008303644,0.25214592,0.0013967782,0.004147109,0.000073877105,0.60927665,0.0007488534],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5406984,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.36459008,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6045219,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00032148237,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015597118,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6470045},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W238310420","doi":"","title":"Respect for Treaty Rights in Ontario: The Law of the Land?","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Treaty; Law; Political science; Land law; Law of the land; Land rights; Law and economics; Economics; Land tenure; Geography; Constitution","score_opus":0.019298097343400163,"score_gpt":0.26987815335730025,"score_spread":0.2505800560139001,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W238310420","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9581362,0.00033142453,0.0000611225,0.0031663284,0.00020496729,0.00020693487,8.1110807e-7,0.000006471778,0.037885755],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9932343,0.00029039386,0.0000051038965,0.000053999982,0.00018450351,0.00000433613,2.2293146e-7,0.0000028934192,0.0062242397],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987585,0.000119510696,0.00015264112,0.00006807438,0.0002199967,0.0006813029],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99965286,0.00008704191,0.00009575004,0.000093971415,0.000047536574,0.000022840275],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001409402,0.000050965795,0.00008854324,0.000022146814,0.0009995505,0.000016288526,0.00024284002,0.000044121534,0.000034678433],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000022441633,0.000026327423,0.0001149796,0.00011239062,0.00017551545,0.000078491146,0.000010390739,0.0006117174,0.0000011590353],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006648936,0.00003691863,0.03167745,4.1934277e-7,0.000026228021,7.154924e-7,0.007399691,0.0000066013613,0.000019136809,0.9601379,0.000104734376,0.0005237155],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00092646084,0.00020246283,0.059731122,0.000013814381,0.000024254537,0.00006556756,0.0012289276,0.000006177192,0.00010289897,0.4506761,0.48693627,0.000085931635],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.41373622,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9917547,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5780185,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007661662,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020202326,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7687835},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2383763873","doi":"","title":"Present Situation and Law Enactment Modes of Civil Partnership Legal Recognition","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hebei faxue","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"General partnership; Law; Position (finance); Civil law (Civil law); Political science; Sociology; Public law; Business","score_opus":0.05630706135885637,"score_gpt":0.33342412138380934,"score_spread":0.27711706002495295,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2383763873","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7265139,0.00018156864,0.00096525846,0.0011582982,0.00010399968,0.00023170836,0.0000039861307,0.000043441723,0.27079782],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986253,0.00011172897,0.00012619325,0.00009963157,0.0002525081,0.000006071838,0.000010111917,0.000004234121,0.00076424365],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99923277,0.00006358025,0.0001576002,0.00011931562,0.000264405,0.00016231874],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996108,0.00009534235,0.00007078489,0.00006647235,0.00007879908,0.0000778211],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007824377,0.000054575452,0.00008095156,0.000042568616,0.00019619265,0.000045351982,0.000041364463,0.00006451035,0.000080932245],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000033287964,0.000054472843,0.000030285719,0.00009070211,0.00013322895,0.00026559544,0.000014620341,0.000050642568,0.0000071434683],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003025681,0.00046038485,0.0057617365,0.00009294679,0.000075055774,0.000011467524,0.048315115,0.000034455876,0.013594784,0.70518893,0.0023769382,0.22378562],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009008989,0.00022555466,0.02031739,0.000094588184,0.00006757336,0.000002515227,0.0079644,0.00030100363,0.023213156,0.01767463,0.92892754,0.00031072076],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008268782,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.033287086,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9265506,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000045928693,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000339907,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99833524},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2391695448","doi":"","title":"Comment on the Case:Big Sky Network Canada, Ltd. v. Sichuan Provincial Government","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Business Research","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Government (linguistics); Interpretation (philosophy); Sky; Law; Federal court; Political science; Business; Geography; Supreme court; Meteorology; Computer science","score_opus":0.05887363084214188,"score_gpt":0.3607075054906494,"score_spread":0.3018338746485075,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2391695448","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10528383,0.000035314133,0.00008051542,0.6647114,0.0015026988,0.0004491751,0.000037878443,0.000024400148,0.2278748],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98802966,0.000052773088,0.00001258487,0.00504833,0.002816548,0.000029083265,0.000007301681,0.0000059841664,0.0039977613],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966118,0.00025863704,0.00016858122,0.00019701356,0.0023678127,0.00039617546],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985633,0.00048381407,0.000052192925,0.00017142009,0.00063520216,0.00009409443],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017572063,0.00008262769,0.00007791927,0.000035248766,0.0011603726,0.00023555229,0.00047769895,0.000049321297,0.00045253357],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00048790482,0.00006255577,0.00003052843,0.0003923929,0.00014123762,0.0000794587,0.00008480146,0.00028453668,0.00002281781],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018414312,0.0002494078,0.0021164813,0.0000036273727,0.000049007274,0.0006748305,0.0013795083,0.00027913472,0.00003950602,0.36017016,0.52699447,0.107859746],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013792192,0.000037538008,0.03086816,0.000026948093,0.0000021110602,0.000008690905,0.00063938054,0.00011789851,0.00002613279,0.0015935294,0.96646595,0.000075752425],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6845248,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8335288,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8827458,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014119286,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00084238773,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.89247656},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2392997425","doi":"","title":"Choice of Jurisdiction Clause in Commercial Contract and Its Legal Effects","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Business Research","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Plaintiff; Law; Business; Subject-matter jurisdiction; Original jurisdiction; Law and economics; Political science; Economics","score_opus":0.11529881632202328,"score_gpt":0.4498993918364264,"score_spread":0.33460057551440314,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2392997425","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9594683,0.00021123592,0.000034403143,0.0070253685,0.00070837396,0.00023668881,0.0000064903375,0.000016497503,0.03229265],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984528,0.00021938386,0.000013088727,0.000036362315,0.00053941674,0.000019167188,0.0000069616635,0.000005825116,0.0007070106],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982216,0.00026667243,0.00017826592,0.00014901256,0.0009817154,0.00020273706],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99789256,0.00050308194,0.00004883143,0.00006274831,0.0013934133,0.00009937676],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017012076,0.000054907767,0.000111141315,0.00033567348,0.000114787654,0.00009105765,0.00020220627,0.0000872695,0.000051783318],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020071063,0.000055761226,0.000017303733,0.00050627213,0.00017707482,0.0004911561,0.00007615192,0.00021363978,0.000014842347],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013405856,0.0012182761,0.70584065,0.00014938535,0.00011326771,0.00011674467,0.021441102,0.00013529668,0.007785309,0.15542965,0.005080395,0.101349354],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009767088,0.00004160045,0.8193192,0.000068134046,0.0000026033226,0.0000014606317,0.00017957042,0.00030064143,0.0003265469,0.0004802718,0.17824094,0.000062361905],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.027528659,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009760547,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17316054,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017644155,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00028485098,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9789471},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2394124988","doi":"","title":"On Classification of Custody Right as to Ne Exeat Right for Children and the First Custody Case in US Supreme Court","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Jinan Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Majority opinion; Dissent; Context (archaeology); Concurring opinion; Political science; Convention; Certiorari; Original jurisdiction; Politics; History","score_opus":0.012234403910452713,"score_gpt":0.28241505025811225,"score_spread":0.27018064634765954,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2394124988","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97438115,0.00006835957,0.000119330085,0.018002719,0.00022350492,0.00069310033,0.0000054322536,0.000008209436,0.00649818],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99849385,0.00007734776,0.00006442382,0.00023078677,0.00032288587,0.000030752344,0.000001515827,0.0000072285684,0.00077122194],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.999013,0.000112792135,0.00027972422,0.00013418452,0.00024771082,0.00021256882],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99927723,0.00016822526,0.0001636995,0.0001193522,0.00014099611,0.00013050598],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009918751,0.000086086126,0.00016130018,0.00011306792,0.00072539324,0.00013878233,0.00015125405,0.00007337876,0.00035337094],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012464635,0.00005545702,0.00006797562,0.00015709299,0.00017033443,0.00021657386,0.000016324873,0.00016931962,0.000020859346],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0020420991,0.0011776193,0.12267315,0.000050835682,0.00024718844,0.00024003233,0.109029815,0.00028521742,0.0010065078,0.5234224,0.1535294,0.0862957],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0050530704,0.0006232623,0.70421904,0.00015429281,0.00008568967,0.0007257767,0.0023865302,0.0006435536,0.00020760542,0.01366562,0.27190948,0.00032611124],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004105749,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0047127847,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5815459,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000908929,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006675802,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6206692},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2394669739","doi":"10.1057/9780230245266_15","title":"A View from the United States","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Surprise; Jurisprudence; Supreme court; Political science; Law; Legislature; Sociology","score_opus":0.03674315662625157,"score_gpt":0.27654734256507646,"score_spread":0.23980418593882488,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2394669739","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00035153897,0.0053584725,0.000030794636,0.00088351755,0.0006996098,0.000564766,0.0002502581,0.00015688586,0.99170417],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9675693,0.0053193267,0.000036468064,0.0014766827,0.0024107466,0.000025410402,0.00040639754,0.00007488433,0.02268079],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980579,0.00013279251,0.00035952366,0.00033922357,0.0006242324,0.0004863114],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983579,0.00044233262,0.00027803367,0.0005278526,0.00015606951,0.00023781176],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000555723,0.0003637401,0.0003749072,0.000104707564,0.0007183502,0.000150655,0.0005165467,0.00038722387,0.0033988429],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000030910873,0.00026992703,0.00024483626,0.00003333448,0.0005102203,8.763028e-7,0.00012730298,0.00040221692,0.00049700576],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000126633795,2.553008e-7,0.00013513931,0.00000698079,0.00012242614,0.000006539303,0.011109606,1.8816242e-7,0.00000428498,0.93739843,0.0002120511,0.050991453],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009196232,0.000013999234,0.0002263466,0.000084201514,0.000100350124,6.529591e-7,0.00027406172,0.0000025102286,0.000003311134,0.43105814,0.5679184,0.00022602563],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018307097,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009064609,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96902335,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010891962,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012326104,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99997526},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2403005348","doi":"","title":"General Report (Intellectual Property and Private International Law)","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Intellectual property; Enforcement; Statutory law; Political science; Law; Conflict of laws; Business","score_opus":0.01764697073525388,"score_gpt":0.28946753313272905,"score_spread":0.27182056239747515,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2403005348","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.84800094,0.0017265879,0.0019459429,0.007225254,0.0015452959,0.00015122857,8.714902e-7,0.00006136632,0.1393425],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9648618,0.0038321146,0.00010023708,0.00014883399,0.00242051,0.0000028332365,0.0000021783565,0.000009293857,0.028622182],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979973,0.000087573666,0.00019566398,0.00010879883,0.00033914662,0.0012715519],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995857,0.00002789227,0.00010154092,0.00006578777,0.000078819554,0.0001402672],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025689073,0.00007871454,0.00008683525,0.000046160087,0.00056564936,0.0001062831,0.00014545853,0.000062651816,0.00019329987],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016009684,0.0000563836,0.00005326248,0.00007192365,0.00013094247,0.00044783924,0.000036810445,0.0006286357,0.000018900133],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003119077,0.000056481134,0.0084420275,8.63705e-7,0.00008844875,0.0000056355084,0.005501481,7.639931e-7,0.00030428453,0.9535493,0.00035685996,0.031662628],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022147801,0.00006552982,0.001153239,0.0000058486685,0.000016591313,0.0009638776,0.001490586,0.000021670854,0.00005693775,0.021709647,0.9741755,0.00011906259],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010279175,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002180772,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97381866,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00050618814,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006026634,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4350575},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2404498640","doi":"","title":"The Right Answers to Ontario's Jurisdictional Questions: Dismiss, Stay or Set Service Aside","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Dismissal; Aside; Law; Order (exchange); Political science; Civil procedure; Set (abstract data type); Set-aside; Service (business); Business; Computer science","score_opus":0.012079365742931973,"score_gpt":0.2959594579282441,"score_spread":0.2838800921853121,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2404498640","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5557709,0.0035110896,0.005802959,0.36972737,0.0024588157,0.0010342018,0.000025126412,0.00032123906,0.06134835],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91300064,0.0057942513,0.0002985909,0.0021034016,0.0031415196,0.000030879823,0.0000074714017,0.000029314999,0.0755939],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99675685,0.00020910711,0.00032584762,0.00020590764,0.0006702105,0.0018320779],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990607,0.00015601904,0.00013345425,0.00016547859,0.00022173657,0.00026263582],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029385546,0.00014908468,0.00013224676,0.00008370061,0.003064597,0.0003008819,0.00043703805,0.00009848094,0.00070954126],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000785855,0.00010156983,0.00010252172,0.00039025646,0.00008884671,0.00038546222,0.0000327104,0.0013061328,0.00013438262],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004691661,0.00015994458,0.0030351053,0.0000025422994,0.00032117136,0.000008690309,0.026900372,0.00040201118,0.000051095118,0.8401868,0.009833821,0.11862931],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028185442,0.00014629058,0.0030830642,0.000016149092,0.000033511515,0.000079202735,0.004013177,0.000026308162,0.000007930924,0.03264586,0.9595145,0.00015214896],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.038976848,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.95618546,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9496807,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003732867,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007981499,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99823326},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2415125617","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2787473","title":"Law in the Future","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University; Vector Institute; Royal Ontario Museum; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Law and economics; Economics","score_opus":0.007864486854241492,"score_gpt":0.27225704928721456,"score_spread":0.26439256243297304,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2415125617","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4588116,0.0061484803,0.001391275,0.2703041,0.0014243101,0.0002787596,0.0000014948996,0.000058829977,0.26158112],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98844635,0.007383428,0.0000031773545,0.00040489988,0.0017612936,0.0000019732615,8.424215e-8,0.00000345293,0.0019953644],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983961,0.00018190968,0.000096921634,0.00006369792,0.0002490216,0.0010123702],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999781,0.000051885647,0.000043390388,0.00006682658,0.000027250815,0.000029628194],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029114494,0.000043193293,0.000049124617,0.000027509137,0.00041831948,0.000051099625,0.00023961856,0.00004837652,0.0000771851],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000017616048,0.000021317604,0.000047806625,0.000119065815,0.000079146215,0.00017934862,0.000006314161,0.0005062675,0.000027544558],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006247295,0.000011179355,0.000673701,1.233979e-7,0.0000048979123,0.0000011841224,0.0019758772,5.168063e-8,0.00003413303,0.92299175,0.000116705145,0.07418417],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002077354,0.000046646775,0.001086298,0.0000055476276,0.0000032966207,0.000024903688,0.009049405,1.501989e-7,0.0000033052763,0.3057377,0.6837953,0.000039726976],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00072409865,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.112913,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.68367857,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00039654618,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007282485,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.903274},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2416588647","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511667435.005","title":"Olympiodorus","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Moncton","funders":"","keywords":"Materials science","score_opus":0.055518115456918746,"score_gpt":0.2555528285071957,"score_spread":0.20003471305027692,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2416588647","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00003708819,0.00028073858,0.000053218188,0.000084719126,0.00056613516,0.00028184446,0.000108875065,0.00022089576,0.9983665],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0008319266,0.00026343882,0.000019794685,0.000048056976,0.0005415467,2.7770162e-7,0.000023080142,0.000026799895,0.99824506],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99870896,0.00005508374,0.00012389454,0.00033596932,0.00049496436,0.00028112],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988829,0.000042011383,0.00016128142,0.0003177754,0.00028052955,0.00031548901],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00026349237,0.00021496437,0.00026665613,0.00012474947,0.00047955185,0.00006455017,0.000427132,0.00045646084,0.00003625969],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000015037532,0.00027399347,0.0001738263,0.000007666359,0.00043950565,0.000102472775,0.00017778894,0.0002941368,0.0000644071],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028995208,0.000003799419,9.470941e-7,0.000007741233,0.000042191885,0.000091044225,0.0004565885,2.4903244e-7,0.0000021272874,0.8736765,0.12132464,0.0043651704],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028785068,0.000027403028,0.0000048465035,0.0000518753,0.00011468631,0.0000018274883,0.00018313034,0.000002905675,0.0000066054054,0.000041214913,0.9989787,0.00029898202],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003120266,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009146871,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.877654,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00045031885,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004452078,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999712},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2418827997","doi":"10.5539/jpl.v9n4p93","title":"Vietnam’s New Law on the Right of Parties to Choose Applicable Law in Civil Relations Involving Foreign Elements","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Politics and Law","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statutory law; Scope (computer science); Law; Private law; Civil law (Civil law); Municipal law; Political science; Public law; Comparative law; Order (exchange); Conflict of laws; Commercial law; Common law; Business; Computer science","score_opus":0.023200792961884275,"score_gpt":0.2876636120949612,"score_spread":0.26446281913307695,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2418827997","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4293242,0.00026655477,0.0001634258,0.025253862,0.00019245634,0.0002557541,0.0000149217,0.000008033563,0.5445208],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967402,0.00009457722,0.00008594583,0.001184311,0.00023881697,0.0000019778747,1.394806e-7,0.000004513225,0.0016495256],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991046,0.0000622113,0.00032656983,0.000060566657,0.00025332085,0.00019271324],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993399,0.00018539422,0.00016433187,0.00008114145,0.000084766136,0.00014446805],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006597076,0.00005628329,0.00012971723,0.00003740333,0.00030029207,0.000047522,0.00010759894,0.000043726865,0.00017642454],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000047362635,0.000032449716,0.000048272723,0.00007623263,0.00017464047,0.00016655549,0.00002237843,0.00008365873,0.000004036108],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007582635,0.000027915192,0.0010371711,0.0000023834825,0.000010209413,9.554475e-7,0.0019673875,0.000004039571,0.00015539418,0.99550784,0.0010313753,0.00024775122],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035672067,0.00012240035,0.0013778169,0.00015799746,0.000016229938,0.000001125535,0.0009803803,0.000007667029,0.00054421,0.22643822,0.7699364,0.000060858583],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005429384,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020295478,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7690696,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006598569,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000721246,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9975816},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W24405889","doi":"","title":"ISPs are Not Broadcasters According to Supreme Court of Canada","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Political science; Law; Business; Telecommunications; Law and economics; Computer science; Economics","score_opus":0.016322955385347344,"score_gpt":0.2727488517932769,"score_spread":0.25642589640792957,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W24405889","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9834057,0.0006324638,0.0007619925,0.0074804034,0.00088153925,0.00010488888,0.000004019082,0.000011470472,0.006717529],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9964798,0.00039022503,0.000021821987,0.00027431935,0.00080679957,0.0000014249275,4.1029284e-7,0.000009312478,0.0020158677],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972153,0.000086151544,0.00020346342,0.00008266903,0.000503094,0.0019093376],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993621,0.000044817523,0.00015903942,0.000081488615,0.00011148109,0.00024104997],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020256652,0.00008062448,0.00014320579,0.00006577842,0.0004365312,0.000033312834,0.00021066144,0.000046197416,0.000066715525],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010505076,0.00007845989,0.000060674076,0.00018169233,0.000032085387,0.00025287195,0.000023808887,0.0005088296,0.000005228548],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00038166472,0.00027389228,0.48780283,0.000027744225,0.00053734035,0.000008926952,0.031576674,0.00015392435,0.0062392945,0.29819697,0.011553698,0.16324705],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00092045695,0.00032840454,0.058026258,0.0001160397,0.00010299643,0.00012378326,0.2290374,0.000024086388,0.0013078445,0.004487626,0.7048874,0.00063768076],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.31792945,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8539716,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.69333375,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015797633,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0040462837,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.71779335},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2460071636","doi":"10.29173/alr114","title":"Public Policy and Recognition of Foreign Divorces: Zhang v Lin and Marzara v Marzara","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Zhàng; Enforcement; Foreign policy; Scope (computer science); Power (physics); Public policy; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Economics; China; Politics; Computer science","score_opus":0.07699427208444094,"score_gpt":0.32552049343677936,"score_spread":0.24852622135233843,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2460071636","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08200838,0.21851522,0.000017613404,0.013354789,0.00018677233,0.0010260977,0.000013544976,0.000040743147,0.68483686],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.77772385,0.21872342,0.000098362536,0.0020473222,0.00041608268,0.000032727654,0.000016668093,0.000011626719,0.0009299579],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989265,0.00018381182,0.00026390707,0.00014736877,0.00018233497,0.00029602888],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991636,0.0002768781,0.00014813199,0.0001334211,0.00007937642,0.00019853606],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009084735,0.000103758684,0.0002664295,0.000042790143,0.00024002763,0.000049917708,0.00008193645,0.00008005416,0.00031455248],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00041243812,0.00009092839,0.000059713777,0.0002523743,0.00025097324,0.0005814111,0.000051860115,0.00006605769,0.000023777055],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003889255,0.000046535013,0.0060270755,0.00090740557,0.000026621921,2.2119772e-7,0.0015455208,2.3712428e-9,0.000013186225,0.72893107,0.0005384948,0.26196],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013446258,0.00003422214,0.0024250473,0.00095483556,0.00007651261,0.000005410042,0.00008199035,0.0000015205709,0.000012791488,0.002903889,0.9932321,0.00013727648],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.048442945,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008801735,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99269354,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002598695,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000047239104,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.95789355},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2461767702","doi":"10.1017/s1474745616000197","title":"John Jackson: A Tribute","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Trade Review","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tribute; Art; Philosophy; Art history; Classics; Sociology","score_opus":0.03392591722821833,"score_gpt":0.3365287490613906,"score_spread":0.30260283183317227,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2461767702","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0001759658,0.27381653,0.00017703377,0.4496597,0.00059619657,0.000720016,0.000011994531,0.00022894742,0.2746136],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.18035068,0.7679172,0.00010516824,0.005619165,0.0010057314,0.000061466475,0.0000043409946,0.00001834737,0.04491787],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990209,0.00014577096,0.00020070333,0.00015465973,0.00024255627,0.00023542643],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995498,0.000076654636,0.00007094031,0.00016116846,0.000017748805,0.00012370014],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006705612,0.00007725972,0.00020646024,0.000035520436,0.00019024611,0.00002173845,0.00015409596,0.000026652937,0.0020008497],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007133077,0.000049266644,0.00013634046,0.00040456187,0.00008872055,0.00013465084,0.000012173281,0.00005489951,0.000309407],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000023231948,0.000025515988,0.00025595058,0.00014045759,0.000012629362,0.0000047013546,0.00023396767,3.9002024e-9,0.00002953358,0.07423816,0.06588262,0.85917413],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000120801706,0.000009138372,0.0009865697,0.0030256046,0.000032311298,0.0000010830742,0.0000061528185,7.313342e-8,0.000010226975,0.00030265265,0.9954181,0.00008733287],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008011632,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009869231,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92953545,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006525502,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006825322,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99891144},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2468736329","doi":"","title":"THE CANADIAN LAW OF TOXIC TORTS, by Lynda Collins & Heather McLeod-Kilmurray","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.01325860125064846,"score_gpt":0.26708937787523995,"score_spread":0.25383077662459147,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2468736329","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007431314,0.00079438766,0.000062876665,0.017308488,0.0009099022,0.00014495204,0.000051083087,0.000021970513,0.973275],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99195164,0.0006910649,0.000044996632,0.00047993183,0.0005027014,0.0000035830813,8.70547e-7,0.000013882115,0.006311318],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984022,0.00018498555,0.00029447442,0.00013027874,0.00049682584,0.00049122947],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99889094,0.0001313136,0.00015647955,0.00017386432,0.00018824836,0.00045915408],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011702001,0.000105013896,0.00014483684,0.000022736773,0.0031878545,0.000225598,0.00035158073,0.0001250583,0.00073832547],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000408311,0.00006251127,0.00011799397,0.00010112927,0.0005515556,0.00023599395,0.00001654419,0.00016929928,0.000032412907],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012811996,0.000027312797,0.0007334064,0.000001140725,0.00003338819,0.000006828693,0.0010215242,6.113575e-7,0.00079897535,0.97936887,0.008215734,0.0097794235],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028584135,0.0000633311,0.0003025645,0.000039504026,0.000015178229,0.000012647396,0.00034433193,0.0000011688539,0.0005067495,0.013341726,0.9849807,0.000106243584],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.87673736,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9974841,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9845203,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00033859597,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004364716,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9981099},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2474707143","doi":"10.17345/1082","title":"CLARKSON, Stephen, WOOD, Stephen, A Perilous Imbalance. The Globalization and Canadian Law and Governance, UBC Press, Toronto/Vancouver, 2010","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revista Catalana de Dret Ambiental","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Globalization; Corporate governance; Political science; Law; Economic history; Sociology; History; Economics; Management","score_opus":0.006107625366688574,"score_gpt":0.2404427049458389,"score_spread":0.2343350795791503,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2474707143","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8596754,0.009699657,0.000030610365,0.0014623844,0.0022385747,0.0012220639,0.0006779125,0.00012989895,0.12486346],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9950291,0.0020813951,0.000044180575,0.0006853877,0.00041841008,0.000019959989,0.00005484998,0.0000186062,0.0016481446],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99852455,0.000094555035,0.00021818186,0.0003374869,0.0003453752,0.00047986204],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999049,0.000039174145,0.00013771569,0.0002939517,0.00008444138,0.00039571925],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005123336,0.00017636213,0.00019663517,0.000012646759,0.0009160279,0.00048594523,0.00025179487,0.00017501578,0.00017524126],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000067950925,0.00015538736,0.000051724805,0.00010574036,0.00053372746,0.000459846,0.000067914036,0.0002241659,0.000004485219],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010501222,0.00010981075,0.08469651,0.000121458936,0.000104802835,0.000049539063,0.022352077,0.0000010860018,0.001059392,0.74632144,0.12743866,0.017640216],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033020027,0.00003305812,0.039430402,0.000027855207,0.000040610314,0.000017956321,0.0014853334,0.00007674724,0.000015740601,0.000088804896,0.9582465,0.00020675558],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7826069,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9788185,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83080786,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00034912815,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024872698,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7045438},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2475766093","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511494611.013","title":"Cambridge Studies in International and Comparative Law","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Content (measure theory); Link (geometry); Computer science; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Information retrieval; Sociology; Mathematics; Computer network","score_opus":0.1510842261441088,"score_gpt":0.41332454842100513,"score_spread":0.2622403222768963,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2475766093","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00029805483,0.0015029901,0.0000026929863,0.0005019167,0.00048065977,0.00009906744,0.000006163481,0.00004679591,0.99706167],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.033981208,0.0074857175,0.00006081353,0.00014225305,0.00038340842,0.000006235514,0.0000036609129,0.000013024864,0.95792365],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995812,0.00003285218,0.00006873623,0.0001081684,0.00013632198,0.000072700816],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99985415,0.000031312382,0.00003845936,0.000032666987,0.000021342703,0.000022073584],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00007345953,0.000060131475,0.00013408503,0.00006985484,0.00006590359,0.000014443531,0.000055357716,0.00006775607,0.0004980922],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000058913142,0.000053437612,0.000014443671,0.00004242059,0.0003843076,0.000034056022,0.00002447928,0.00005514893,0.000023636605],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000026091807,0.00001722748,0.00044191445,0.0000040415625,0.000052959327,0.00000713434,0.01643098,6.914917e-8,4.5037064e-7,0.34766147,0.63492364,0.0004574955],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010293603,0.0000054883308,0.00032127814,0.00003740375,0.0000022654062,5.6174065e-7,0.004247804,0.0000017078622,7.047113e-7,0.00004098817,0.99517655,0.00006231117],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03343947,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13957004,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3602529,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000042243453,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002169198,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97299695},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2477044125","doi":"","title":"Asia-Pacific Legal Development [Book Review]","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Singapore journal of legal studies","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Asia pacific; Pagination; Publishing; Project commissioning; Index (typography); Library science; Political science; Management; Media studies; Sociology; Law; Art; Ethnology; Computer science; Economics","score_opus":0.03317742970057561,"score_gpt":0.339465686248779,"score_spread":0.30628825654820335,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2477044125","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.029973181,0.5679593,0.000021100774,0.050659668,0.0014582915,0.0003067236,0.0000018568006,0.00005993057,0.34955996],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3231925,0.5141384,0.0014484153,0.005006218,0.0034822484,0.0000114763925,0.0000023763728,0.000039797014,0.15267855],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980075,0.00014986952,0.0006679159,0.00012959322,0.00074296835,0.00030220448],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989087,0.000073545874,0.00034569183,0.00008892576,0.00045175807,0.00013139898],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015757274,0.00014558263,0.0004281771,0.0000793786,0.0008954503,0.000094188035,0.00020357627,0.000051069444,0.0010862165],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017909272,0.00011474289,0.00017217286,0.00023501762,0.00026749325,0.0006276067,0.00002427973,0.00026850952,0.0000473422],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009597246,0.00016905736,0.0005030989,0.00017249628,0.0004801979,0.00023581841,0.022259168,0.0000062707354,0.00005233,0.0029579538,0.6530069,0.32006073],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018776489,0.00009154075,0.00059736776,0.0008628241,0.00006241752,0.000050787698,0.002659267,2.5001955e-7,0.00006845062,0.000053449752,0.9952328,0.00013305576],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009244259,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00016617439,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.34222594,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024969436,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00041679156,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998269},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2481554059","doi":"10.1515/9783866536081.313","title":"Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments in the Canadian Common Law Provinces","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Yearbook of Private International Law","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law enforcement; Law; Enforcement; Political science; Geography; Criminology; Psychology","score_opus":0.04062201942039266,"score_gpt":0.278676280110208,"score_spread":0.23805426068981533,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2481554059","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0014547497,0.00004026055,0.0000034269428,0.0005010828,0.00013952018,0.0003413972,0.00009687297,0.000005357848,0.99741733],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9809116,0.00011460593,0.00004397671,0.00040135984,0.00016258516,0.0000105245645,0.00011527566,0.000009682279,0.018230407],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989475,0.000035283992,0.0002960276,0.0001282905,0.00048395075,0.00010892192],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99943465,0.00006799554,0.00024282998,0.00010744253,0.00010157243,0.00004549069],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005597188,0.0000949176,0.00015602843,0.000101086516,0.00010876108,0.000042334366,0.00027364577,0.00013339713,0.0006057531],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000010113688,0.00008313314,0.00005061665,0.000013340164,0.0003998141,0.00007767606,0.000036796326,0.00012752328,0.00001023395],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010989263,0.0000069597754,0.00007512635,0.000013551945,0.00002830702,0.000001572411,0.00072749605,6.895419e-7,0.0000044179824,0.9966744,0.00008506115,0.0023714262],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014662524,0.00005033606,0.00008756766,0.00018639861,0.000015020739,5.13673e-7,0.00004681629,0.000008558194,0.00005178331,0.2649357,0.73439306,0.00007763037],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3840475,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.74210596,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97945684,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001607849,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000100670855,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6632572},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2481786755","doi":"10.1163/ej.9789004156395.i-320.98","title":"17. New Regulations for Letters of Petition","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"State (computer science); Quarter (Canadian coin); Political science; Law; Capital (architecture); Public administration; History; Archaeology; Computer science","score_opus":0.04471932463761571,"score_gpt":0.2900531101410725,"score_spread":0.24533378550345677,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2481786755","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000040487834,0.00008877583,0.003608045,0.005700548,0.00022295944,0.00030070808,0.000018103208,0.000046268244,0.9899741],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0009301946,0.00052464154,0.00096940674,0.00021865156,0.0008573862,0.0000037620498,0.000048101916,0.000012273622,0.9964356],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993986,0.000005091688,0.00017070217,0.00012105429,0.00021271825,0.00009183259],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995747,0.000058439473,0.00012775089,0.00009963887,0.00008351041,0.000055912944],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000087904766,0.00007638565,0.00013124615,0.000073461626,0.00020916146,0.00001191686,0.00006940903,0.00014206358,0.0020311545],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000012802277,0.000080110076,0.00014680212,0.000016405844,0.00012382258,0.000066492656,0.000007670469,0.000046977333,0.000014081231],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007207463,0.0000044527314,0.000005897983,0.0000065620675,0.000019277206,2.8306678e-7,0.001533871,0.0000047168305,0.000049177535,0.70957404,0.2805545,0.00824002],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010303224,0.000020006055,0.00010837585,0.000031734595,0.000024892626,3.429481e-7,0.00002166117,0.0000034690324,0.000009808641,0.005625585,0.99396294,0.00008814432],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00091856037,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019612873,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.71340847,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004835111,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014347713,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988811},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2483015779","doi":"10.1515/9783866537156.2.83","title":"PRIVATE INTERNATIONAL LAW IN A GLOBALIZING AGE: THE QUIET CANADIAN REVOLUTION","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Yearbook of Private International Law","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"QUIET; Political science; Law; Economic history; History; Physics","score_opus":0.022493179012263952,"score_gpt":0.28643851564635076,"score_spread":0.2639453366340868,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2483015779","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000380779,0.00017277422,0.000018566074,0.009088999,0.0014741534,0.00038042862,0.00012565881,0.000044967946,0.9883137],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5985356,0.0013484319,0.0005318078,0.0029906228,0.0027205464,0.000022846703,0.00033566589,0.000066623455,0.39344785],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976747,0.00007662251,0.0005789732,0.00035699893,0.0009900035,0.00032271162],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99889344,0.00009041065,0.00035569412,0.00029652473,0.00022514832,0.00013878457],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008489221,0.00024195551,0.00027312292,0.00024479776,0.0002341823,0.0001512213,0.0011092421,0.00036553686,0.0011007342],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008178591,0.00023461485,0.0001947267,0.00006144805,0.0005205051,0.0002857299,0.00013478339,0.00046481358,0.000100451034],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024467152,0.000016659606,0.00008114009,0.0000048490433,0.000081107115,0.0000388539,0.0007160486,0.00001436655,0.00003989597,0.99608463,0.0006396368,0.0022583497],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021795601,0.000021760294,0.00079115666,0.00028905857,0.000018369881,0.0000034145494,0.000026910493,0.00002558394,0.000015614545,0.12912795,0.86926556,0.00019666007],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.15309142,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.50007737,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86862594,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013741719,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00029687484,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998124},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2487283933","doi":"10.14288/1.0077540","title":"A Comparative study of the contract remedy systems between Anglo-American law and Chinese law","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"cIRcle (University of British Columbia)","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Comparative law; Political science; Delict; Black letter law; Private law","score_opus":0.020351678212355603,"score_gpt":0.24015884327160109,"score_spread":0.21980716505924547,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2487283933","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9835383,0.00007805894,0.000004779271,0.00007596131,0.00008270587,0.00046725638,0.000059868325,0.000025430963,0.015667593],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99962795,0.00004359669,0.000007352519,0.000019854515,0.000047654987,4.5204698e-7,0.0000015746799,0.0000036291867,0.00024793542],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989832,0.00024130402,0.00011639507,0.00018450701,0.0003328206,0.00014174083],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99928313,0.00009817903,0.00021021099,0.00015472705,0.00017003204,0.000083726154],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00024381824,0.000033856864,0.00033776386,0.000013938681,0.0009789917,0.000046008,0.00022558263,0.000043120515,0.000010482556],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000011584357,0.00007911359,0.000060148206,0.00030525104,0.0016596797,0.00021673634,0.00007110817,0.00009317035,9.180527e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017318187,0.00042222327,0.92526156,0.000021425449,0.00014843493,0.00004067259,0.062189333,0.0000050024723,0.00004790084,0.00023764819,0.0002887861,0.011319703],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006636595,0.00016453769,0.96275586,0.000034631546,0.00003914756,0.000005969007,0.034604747,0.000014215578,1.2070389e-7,0.00002944978,0.0016081487,0.00007952871],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9269208,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.94202757,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.037494294,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000040306673,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005294138,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7529712},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2489818519","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511675805.004","title":"Hape <i>v</i>. Her Majesty the Queen (Attorney-General of Ontario intervening)","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Law Reports","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Jurisdiction; Sovereignty; Subject-matter jurisdiction; International law; Political science; Comity; Charter; Original jurisdiction; Politics","score_opus":0.03400585744532388,"score_gpt":0.28694594396651213,"score_spread":0.25294008652118827,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2489818519","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.33282632,0.000014167288,0.00005279326,0.000829933,0.0016726892,0.00009215697,0.0000023864586,0.000028203136,0.66448134],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.960223,0.0000046839764,0.00026667013,0.00026003906,0.00031388906,0.000011019133,0.0000065685363,0.000007010138,0.038907126],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988354,0.000048718015,0.0003635195,0.00016414924,0.000454372,0.00013388488],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992454,0.000024984678,0.0002846884,0.00017916229,0.00021298535,0.000052749554],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006018814,0.00007427265,0.0000991076,0.000026925087,0.00016021311,0.000041112587,0.00021972167,0.000058952148,0.0026212737],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004537668,0.000057103895,0.00012499317,0.000049180362,0.000223059,0.00019393915,0.000064941625,0.000109267865,0.000010748364],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038466587,0.00014599439,0.17901517,0.0000027610574,0.0001289628,0.00012455428,0.032536298,0.000004012162,0.00011020075,0.78381395,0.001727123,0.0023524943],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006610285,0.000026803875,0.061775103,0.000020829875,0.000013177133,0.000023353903,0.00012108237,0.0000035243602,0.0005718576,0.006389977,0.9309149,0.00007329989],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.60830647,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3184672,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9291878,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019426217,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022690643,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9982905},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2490719310","doi":"","title":"Canadian Friend Tsin Wan Receives Title of Friendship Ambassador","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"友声：英文版","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Friendship; Political science; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.017251415511424797,"score_gpt":0.3110861304010085,"score_spread":0.29383471488958374,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2490719310","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13744776,0.000062096085,0.000027807197,0.001182756,0.00039012238,0.00004759365,0.000008469576,0.000020775948,0.8608126],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9889333,0.0000173974,0.00010315443,0.000078830344,0.0002127936,6.9101657e-7,0.0000030077363,0.0000046705936,0.010646139],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994934,0.000019166948,0.00008637671,0.00007649341,0.00013893546,0.00018559146],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99968815,0.000028193677,0.00003055185,0.00007996978,0.000040145995,0.00013296747],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003742171,0.000036433154,0.00005729595,0.00006672822,0.00013252329,0.000014948829,0.0000827401,0.00006165033,0.0023691598],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000048210255,0.000036793343,0.000028482065,0.00014471737,0.0000685458,0.000047202193,0.000006044175,0.000052227224,0.00015949173],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028461765,0.00008629952,0.02887633,0.000022810298,0.00004289214,0.000036700192,0.091831245,0.0000013552406,0.001098364,0.56459737,0.075095735,0.23828243],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000042832027,0.00001268793,0.015073578,0.0000053926233,0.0000036793035,2.2028263e-7,0.002826185,0.0000017065853,0.0003228596,0.0003915245,0.9812707,0.000048666177],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.33947206,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.724636,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90617496,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007804991,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017169744,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985428},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2492795536","doi":"10.1017/cbo9781139043281.004","title":"Note on the text and translation","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Translation (biology); Natural language processing; Computer science; Linguistics; Artificial intelligence; Philosophy; Biology; Genetics","score_opus":0.04312504416634884,"score_gpt":0.24016169022400322,"score_spread":0.19703664605765436,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2492795536","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00019580779,0.00020114197,0.00007854938,0.00047897606,0.00017656364,0.00030743948,0.00004222339,0.000057811092,0.9984615],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.021693496,0.0005458459,0.000009974685,0.000102445854,0.00031600954,3.2202067e-7,0.0000062684912,0.000013314656,0.9773123],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992843,0.00005737812,0.00007203738,0.00018057028,0.00023933717,0.00016633942],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994261,0.00015954633,0.00008946626,0.00017221869,0.000050719224,0.00010195131],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00021724489,0.000136305,0.00012610218,0.0000571657,0.00064177485,0.00004608327,0.00016475416,0.0002449819,0.000021143664],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00000584408,0.00012565147,0.000083143306,0.0000048833604,0.00034021423,0.00007522727,0.000039421193,0.0002546452,0.000013879907],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002711996,0.0000027676163,0.0000011860226,0.0000058487703,0.000018758581,0.000004204955,0.0014557203,9.56889e-8,0.000008725345,0.9592037,0.003035433,0.03623642],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012845092,0.000018180866,0.00004929521,0.000042883446,0.00008672459,5.6680796e-7,0.00010461731,0.0000069666703,0.000017300526,0.00002297862,0.999377,0.00014499818],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007251969,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006596705,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9963416,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008579802,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005356461,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5123918},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2493112793","doi":"10.1515/9783866539174.339","title":"The Influence of Swiss Law on Quebec's 1994 Codification of Private International Law","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Yearbook of Private International Law","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Conflict of laws","score_opus":0.017122733301202942,"score_gpt":0.28656212550914495,"score_spread":0.269439392207942,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2493112793","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014031331,0.000061432176,0.00002895801,0.002262925,0.0013892838,0.00043661045,0.00026800105,0.000042338932,0.9814791],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9022911,0.00043356715,0.00023652571,0.00030886245,0.0006218871,0.000017632265,0.00012672353,0.00004252238,0.095921144],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969963,0.00005257811,0.0009130895,0.0003489109,0.001485557,0.00020355663],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99709064,0.0003436213,0.001307844,0.0005106019,0.0006652339,0.00008207279],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000733229,0.0002534292,0.00035324373,0.00012889242,0.00024978133,0.000085429085,0.0013932413,0.00038750508,0.0004576445],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000094400224,0.00022659212,0.00025096186,0.000041300762,0.0021604784,0.00028013706,0.00020469354,0.00047604254,0.000043710672],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011319748,0.000057671165,0.000039432794,0.000018184695,0.00018208394,0.0000016790444,0.00047108007,0.000033223037,0.0061456864,0.9920977,0.00006111325,0.000778947],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000266147,0.00005933371,0.00050957565,0.00031992217,0.000032186956,8.355063e-7,0.000015885233,0.000009597581,0.006006771,0.12415284,0.86844385,0.00018305001],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013739664,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022708263,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8882598,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018781754,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015046864,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99512476},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2494351525","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511496837.002","title":"Note on transliteration, dates, and translations","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Transliteration; Natural language processing; Artificial intelligence; Linguistics; Computer science; History; Philosophy","score_opus":0.022878521693717863,"score_gpt":0.23541016433680964,"score_spread":0.21253164264309177,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2494351525","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000102233214,0.00012015921,0.0010011974,0.00026164192,0.00014494057,0.00032292563,0.00031335177,0.00010767237,0.9976259],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.007856569,0.00022589708,0.000038121238,0.000060343547,0.00022997554,4.2043465e-7,0.00010694665,0.000017560697,0.99146414],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991166,0.000042975757,0.00012621077,0.00030081434,0.00024817567,0.00016523318],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99947095,0.000066778106,0.00008274084,0.000173178,0.00009494485,0.00011142952],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00011027448,0.00017619715,0.00017789993,0.0000961039,0.00067783514,0.000086797416,0.00014284509,0.00029373003,0.000010556666],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000028163863,0.00022052834,0.00009660308,0.000007985802,0.0002868727,0.00011289798,0.000016383756,0.0002285574,0.000004605718],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002824225,0.0000063367042,0.0000017786248,0.000012302706,0.000019827045,0.000019386925,0.0009401226,0.0000028634963,0.000010725743,0.98414403,0.009202446,0.0056119235],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030472956,0.000030142082,0.00004704257,0.00006481975,0.000106123276,7.973784e-7,0.000026325062,0.000033849945,0.000019326199,0.000029670387,0.99911517,0.00022200446],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017207362,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003064045,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98991275,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009150337,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010160302,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8992885},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2494374144","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511815300.010","title":"Family law and succession","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Cornerstone; Institution; Harmony (color); Order (exchange); Lease; Family law; Scope (computer science); Social order; Sociology; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Business; History","score_opus":0.029874986560415775,"score_gpt":0.23702590266870951,"score_spread":0.20715091610829373,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2494374144","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00035382828,0.00067561085,0.000031558895,0.00004969541,0.00032296905,0.00022967938,0.00005553526,0.00011620472,0.9981649],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0141003085,0.0011302991,0.000018821256,0.00014753643,0.00038743118,2.4305646e-7,0.000012843354,0.000019452385,0.9841831],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99905175,0.000048413338,0.00009987387,0.0002647064,0.000282622,0.00025260943],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992894,0.000049344377,0.00012551341,0.00019647284,0.00009470731,0.0002445502],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00018159092,0.00018242905,0.00021418344,0.00007247358,0.00073499855,0.00006551016,0.00021357139,0.00038849132,0.000012804462],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000003273641,0.00021404852,0.000092514994,0.000004855645,0.0005718117,0.00017591023,0.00018687696,0.00029395553,0.000011314567],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022446899,0.000003903715,0.000005979547,0.00001679937,0.000025322217,0.00002052588,0.00043215486,2.2499602e-8,0.000026351318,0.9888785,0.0053385356,0.005229459],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019691646,0.000016059432,0.00007147742,0.00007822467,0.00010886781,0.0000011848033,0.00013742586,0.0000012757853,0.00001726281,0.000025051737,0.9991048,0.00024142567],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007560444,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00013846623,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9937663,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012758272,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008184195,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990483},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2496681289","doi":"10.1515/9783110869156.189","title":"Chapter V: THE INUIT CASE SYSTEM","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Geography","score_opus":0.049625965496093626,"score_gpt":0.2662628924672199,"score_spread":0.21663692697112627,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2496681289","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000046751324,0.00020593802,0.000039803686,0.00059341,0.000732966,0.0003288808,0.000018708826,0.00016887751,0.99786466],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.25954056,0.00014185719,0.000007936138,0.00014077564,0.0007245887,0.0000052101627,7.9531e-7,0.00001889003,0.7394194],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99906814,0.000023176752,0.00020584874,0.00021350045,0.00030272175,0.00018663083],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993164,0.00005077262,0.0001336326,0.00029974795,0.00010076635,0.00009871092],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00046616272,0.00016438481,0.00017593424,0.000051871,0.0006518413,0.00007972135,0.00021566892,0.00028828997,0.01141487],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000055781825,0.00010747637,0.00015187936,0.00001362056,0.0002500523,0.00006733415,0.000058373374,0.00021326987,0.00086858147],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002583859,0.0000015545925,0.0000011390749,0.0000069055095,0.000024392835,0.00021930553,0.010354773,1.9013182e-8,1.4804678e-7,0.962498,0.0005621235,0.02632907],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000041074116,0.00001883629,0.00000351089,0.000049359016,0.000053746022,0.00013397064,0.0012236041,0.000002133527,8.1720697e-7,0.0045634173,0.9937506,0.00015896442],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012168437,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03998881,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99318844,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011742848,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008561871,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99990934},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2498007034","doi":"10.1017/cbo9781139179058.007","title":"Jurisdiction, questions of law and discretion","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Discretion; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.023312813315991016,"score_gpt":0.24101215694511388,"score_spread":0.21769934362912285,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2498007034","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00013312534,0.00037608028,0.00056096824,0.00005275572,0.00023262812,0.00023173275,0.00012465965,0.00008091186,0.99820715],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.03427845,0.0011300724,0.000039649985,0.00002564863,0.00023010258,4.2182992e-7,0.000019549003,0.00001529173,0.9642608],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992064,0.00005399264,0.00013604561,0.00019819537,0.00023887726,0.00016648344],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992595,0.000044691973,0.00018834384,0.00018285199,0.0001660835,0.00015858174],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00018665538,0.0001434061,0.00020653427,0.00009156241,0.00049686263,0.000025255735,0.00013092642,0.0003073914,0.000017779968],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000004821018,0.00017685804,0.00009858523,0.000006325155,0.0007814556,0.00016010189,0.000067681896,0.00019616415,0.000003195603],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019480898,0.000007116444,0.0000046366904,0.000023264,0.00003883887,0.0000031208874,0.0008405059,1.8499544e-7,0.000017656916,0.99571025,0.0008729429,0.002462026],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015121952,0.000021027134,0.000067814944,0.00009110013,0.00019992917,0.0000015486175,0.00009701401,0.0000029300036,0.000034178458,0.000060554506,0.9991061,0.00016655771],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0056409813,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000184249,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9982332,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011250424,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000075414864,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8527514},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2498487130","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511493973.030","title":"Summary Conclusions: family unity, expert roundtable, Geneva, November 2001","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tribunal; Refugee; Immigration; Political science; Law; Sociology; Gender studies; Library science","score_opus":0.05609457059006314,"score_gpt":0.2680530958322753,"score_spread":0.21195852524221218,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2498487130","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00016185296,0.0011815947,0.00034116828,0.000215796,0.0010722181,0.0006384137,0.0002291525,0.00021623317,0.99594355],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00012984985,0.0050202166,0.000093090566,0.001092854,0.0005161647,0.0000016149481,0.00007262312,0.000057677746,0.9930159],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975855,0.00018865259,0.00027564255,0.0006215293,0.0007106279,0.00061809714],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981686,0.00011967058,0.00027665248,0.00057624216,0.00040873614,0.00045013454],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00042205967,0.0004411133,0.00051135395,0.00022248611,0.0015193999,0.00021255217,0.00067554094,0.00080326677,0.000085029234],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002588391,0.000553736,0.00031122103,0.000029840767,0.00055537367,0.00041634243,0.0004516708,0.00059480476,0.000030408917],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039048617,0.000019440808,0.0000049615614,0.000013553004,0.000097037504,0.00014239577,0.00041640617,9.487324e-7,0.000048716887,0.6661712,0.331903,0.0011432915],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005318436,0.00003981943,0.000011959894,0.0001486292,0.00014153149,0.000004351655,0.0005555621,0.000006082343,0.000021576443,0.000034168555,0.9978921,0.0006123975],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017797628,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005688893,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.666137,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001100247,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006021192,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997805},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2500566902","doi":"10.1007/978-90-6704-607-7_3","title":"The Globalisation of the Law and the Work of the Supreme Court of Canada","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Hague Academic Press, an imprint of T.M.C. Asser Press eBooks","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Globalization; Political science; Work (physics); Engineering; Mechanical engineering","score_opus":0.026303526262341993,"score_gpt":0.26080547203470583,"score_spread":0.23450194577236383,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2500566902","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02894162,0.0033731002,0.000016290876,0.0025161726,0.002009929,0.0024517004,0.00022847777,0.000028637221,0.9604341],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9579503,0.00089623564,0.000012590085,0.00015743637,0.00031682992,0.000028991482,0.0000022136799,0.000031313222,0.040604103],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968751,0.0003772514,0.0008976006,0.00028901626,0.00125949,0.0003015509],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961496,0.0005943686,0.001746993,0.0010216862,0.00040214014,0.00008520661],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020582313,0.00026934952,0.0004998229,0.000017553994,0.000604873,0.00003601788,0.0019257676,0.00063807465,0.000012319865],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019525237,0.00014025474,0.0002365559,0.000022271406,0.0039412263,0.0000956455,0.00056788843,0.0011812332,6.3114335e-8],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016577366,0.000009318985,0.0002938342,0.0000865241,0.00017366096,1.4335632e-7,0.0063132383,0.000013910435,0.00105505,0.98836094,0.0008645714,0.0026630054],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00083200977,0.000040461724,0.0051216455,0.0006618622,0.00049440796,0.0000026274952,0.0005136,0.000044677392,0.023942087,0.037669703,0.93034065,0.00033626126],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.431358,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3482022,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9506913,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000064534936,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006980486,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99876946},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W250370597","doi":"","title":"Extraterritorial Enforcement of Pipeda: A Multi-Tiered Analysis","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"˜The œGeorge Washington international law review","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statute; Personally identifiable information; Law; Business; Enforcement; Privacy law; Possession (linguistics); European union; Population; Law enforcement; Directive; Information privacy; Political science; Privacy policy; Sociology","score_opus":0.031117268261724635,"score_gpt":0.3390862629733977,"score_spread":0.3079689947116731,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W250370597","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.026002329,0.043771688,0.02585864,0.04905574,0.025067678,0.0052596787,0.00047049063,0.0005467967,0.823967],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98791665,0.008016897,0.0002644051,0.0008298889,0.00083933794,0.000049255723,0.00006437831,0.000009772656,0.002009433],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99808234,0.00014660995,0.0005599964,0.00021825892,0.0007881182,0.00020469313],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99899256,0.00007054744,0.00032461912,0.00024037345,0.0002906435,0.00008127504],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013383762,0.0001287296,0.00031101008,0.00007427052,0.0003132816,0.00008648561,0.0005861841,0.00006712325,0.0013089239],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007067187,0.00009813544,0.00037926948,0.00042724895,0.00019650321,0.0002261249,0.000068206486,0.00013164256,0.000030376017],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016393726,0.00013202241,0.00024160062,0.00007001297,0.00052703853,0.0000020405944,0.0016686188,0.000098603414,0.000071406495,0.99324125,0.00028471506,0.0036463053],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039905577,0.000023887607,0.0002097945,0.0003505732,0.00040292693,7.2209224e-7,0.000100067395,0.000074197815,0.000073680116,0.0013721436,0.99687093,0.000122001],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04013614,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.028831782,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99658626,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022185048,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012263472,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999604},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2503855069","doi":"10.1515/9783866537200.2.343","title":"RECOGNITION AND ENFORCEMENT OF FOREIGN JUDGMENTS IN QUEBEC","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Yearbook of Private International Law","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Enforcement; Psychology; Political science; Criminology; Law","score_opus":0.037764118086684666,"score_gpt":0.2832049070119058,"score_spread":0.24544078892522114,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2503855069","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0018201666,0.00006643586,0.000010266807,0.00017237104,0.00013375557,0.00022197758,0.000056176672,0.000009498069,0.99750936],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.54984194,0.0011074112,0.0003162068,0.0001939035,0.00031887286,0.0000080670015,0.00019575225,0.000020946942,0.44799688],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99897707,0.000013493415,0.0003493261,0.00014504018,0.00042672883,0.000088363],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99945873,0.000033849687,0.0002770593,0.00008146401,0.00011485414,0.000034022145],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002378294,0.000097239405,0.0001783692,0.00013972573,0.000029189609,0.000018414667,0.00014361966,0.00014285273,0.0016197631],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000014694086,0.0001080742,0.00006150898,0.000013828784,0.00019364817,0.00012776756,0.000043642067,0.00009727416,0.000012127448],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029309642,0.00001852037,0.000036152764,0.000011675021,0.000034091954,0.0000020800514,0.00045962736,9.811424e-7,0.000053834738,0.97359926,0.00004595618,0.02570849],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032293898,0.000060116407,0.00018031926,0.00040307394,0.000017036537,3.0367423e-7,0.000035213136,0.000006839372,0.00028856864,0.285575,0.71299595,0.00011464847],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020431865,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015106744,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.71295,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013886676,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000056861445,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992929},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2509239612","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511894879.005","title":"Truth and reconciliation","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Sociology","score_opus":0.0359412574369504,"score_gpt":0.23028920706661696,"score_spread":0.19434794962966656,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2509239612","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0004236608,0.00033384294,0.000042942465,0.000049705355,0.00039512196,0.0002080868,0.000055242665,0.000094572584,0.9983968],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.007685961,0.0010189618,0.00002007638,0.000029647725,0.00043009585,2.4124e-7,0.000014971687,0.000014237545,0.9907858],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99923885,0.00004170275,0.00009232381,0.00022216675,0.00021199814,0.00019298946],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993655,0.00006975603,0.0001360413,0.000152899,0.000099173354,0.00017659565],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020946216,0.00014162659,0.00017282424,0.000082483966,0.00042397718,0.000044363715,0.00013249666,0.00031931986,0.000021500728],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000134106185,0.00017975265,0.00007678149,0.000004277744,0.00026352066,0.00013934626,0.0000806095,0.00019483517,0.000011023551],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018060837,0.0000023165924,0.000007839222,0.000012476659,0.000027436858,0.000006968893,0.0007051772,2.5722025e-8,0.0000035854537,0.9750034,0.0038107783,0.020401923],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018376225,0.000014920102,0.000099510995,0.000037730068,0.00010832525,0.0000011565211,0.00014491283,0.0000026547689,0.000010771943,0.000022159036,0.99917954,0.00019456071],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010669326,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004665764,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9953688,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018555044,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009477981,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.73301005},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W251917808","doi":"","title":"The Deconstitutionalization of Canadian Private International Law","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University; York University","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Jurisprudence; Jurisdiction; Political science; Federalism; Spar; Foundation (evidence); Constitutional law; Original jurisdiction; Engineering","score_opus":0.010673002006720658,"score_gpt":0.266383159811213,"score_spread":0.25571015780449236,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W251917808","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.048200443,0.0016896118,0.004319316,0.013894128,0.0017916698,0.00016136466,0.000003704903,0.000018167379,0.92992157],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9914012,0.0062139146,0.000027832231,0.00008419983,0.00015371517,0.0000013166244,0.00000134824,0.000002867848,0.0021136354],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988174,0.00009703705,0.00014522743,0.000051875384,0.00023087522,0.0006576151],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996148,0.000036553593,0.00008830553,0.000047356476,0.00013990597,0.0000730847],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002027296,0.0000374671,0.00004054896,0.000098097946,0.0010694754,0.000065563116,0.00016807832,0.00003679616,0.0000870322],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014912341,0.000029888837,0.000042414515,0.00019945129,0.00018845708,0.0001470512,0.0000036450567,0.00026951052,0.000006442889],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002765143,0.000005150664,0.0013047424,1.4544086e-7,0.000027344573,2.269785e-7,0.00027246337,0.000013547047,0.000014150642,0.9959144,0.000043185315,0.0024018844],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009040212,0.00001165302,0.0002104438,0.0000029446771,0.000004404481,0.000016546297,0.0008553425,0.000004575296,0.000027132166,0.2642207,0.7345271,0.00002871551],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.049701758,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8410715,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9432007,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00070864556,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004357373,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.95662636},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2520981256","doi":"10.3138/uram.26.3.210","title":"Domestic Relations Law: Searching For Ultimate Reality In A Penultimate World","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ultimate Reality and Meaning","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.06958529394636921,"score_gpt":0.3884197617582988,"score_spread":0.3188344678119296,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2520981256","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15921211,0.0002522785,0.009394758,0.0042281304,0.0004485096,0.0017974905,0.00012823043,0.00040508504,0.8241334],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99401265,0.00017898399,0.0045401063,0.00012377005,0.000071038936,0.000058742175,0.000031188072,0.000018247738,0.0009652682],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979599,0.00040600332,0.0004121888,0.000371166,0.00027948173,0.000571237],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99872696,0.0006528865,0.00013857472,0.00018730959,0.000099421806,0.00019483644],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003679283,0.00015935053,0.000279489,0.00014285331,0.0012994179,0.00019423405,0.00010781968,0.00010333055,0.000071144226],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00071596925,0.00016599869,0.00007832537,0.0003503254,0.00023091889,0.00042512582,0.000029962333,0.00023510329,0.000009219681],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000052875308,0.000078090525,0.0033014284,0.00010451598,0.000018826475,0.000007726221,0.027792811,0.0003988678,0.000303968,0.9624055,0.00012841515,0.005406979],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005632491,0.0001560852,0.036750436,0.0010019464,0.00021572277,0.000031249,0.013567872,0.036063634,0.0006183954,0.3094017,0.5949875,0.0015729709],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024304079,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04597648,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83480054,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001770111,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000120237004,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99942034},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2521522969","doi":"10.7202/1069159ar","title":"MARTTI KOSKENNIEMI, FROM APOLOGY TO UTOPIA: THE STRUCTURE OF INTERNATIONAL LEGAL ARGUMENT (REISSUE WITH NEW EPILOGUE) (CAMBRIDGE: CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS, 2005) – UNITING PRAGMATISM AND THEORY IN INTERNATIONAL LEGAL SCHOLARSHIP: KOSKENNIEMI’S FROM APOLOGY TO UTOPIA REVISITED","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue québécoise de droit international","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Utopia; Pragmatism; Scholarship; Argument (complex analysis); Political science; International law; Law; Philosophy; Sociology; Epistemology","score_opus":0.0074616482203067064,"score_gpt":0.24250518285114167,"score_spread":0.23504353463083497,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2521522969","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94460726,0.0001810943,0.004017608,0.019036328,0.0011519898,0.00059464,0.0011181623,0.00006520097,0.029227726],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98140067,0.0002004412,0.0020611677,0.00095527293,0.0015378853,0.000007090333,0.0005991002,0.00002624689,0.0132121295],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974511,0.00034310107,0.00056385266,0.0006076276,0.0006009414,0.00043332393],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982919,0.0004824772,0.0003813273,0.00029405107,0.00032195472,0.00022828867],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006319704,0.0002683492,0.0003672812,0.00034853644,0.00021246944,0.00020419234,0.0010326577,0.00023681781,0.00035750333],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003635704,0.00027492602,0.00009392958,0.00024340373,0.00023587001,0.00060060306,0.0002658568,0.0005118583,0.000010547983],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00064693956,0.00010927204,0.034919146,0.000009345702,0.00025107415,0.00009205659,0.001557839,0.0004243675,0.0029877021,0.953122,0.0028135215,0.0030667263],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014014913,0.00008582876,0.28177285,0.00029186122,0.00007799852,0.000049103808,0.0007812153,0.00045122774,0.0006056609,0.00353441,0.7105705,0.00037779627],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.23811682,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09383518,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9495876,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009022522,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00042483408,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999703},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2522136545","doi":"","title":"Forum clauses in carriage contracts after the Brussels I (bis) Regulation: procedural (un)certainty?","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS)","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Carriage; Certainty; Business; Medicine; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.029104283565256624,"score_gpt":0.289059362778737,"score_spread":0.2599550792134804,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2522136545","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9829832,0.0011160655,0.00018076331,0.005808516,0.00037570845,0.0004386367,0.000075503776,0.000092453214,0.008929208],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99759877,0.00025978146,0.00012018594,0.00088044023,0.00065934943,0.000028564991,0.000181591,0.000014227802,0.00025711433],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99826145,0.0003306724,0.00026006455,0.00036361715,0.00033718836,0.00044700422],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998893,0.00027472974,0.00011262077,0.0004906154,0.000046772933,0.00018225856],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013308267,0.00015273952,0.00018167893,0.00005221461,0.00050858787,0.00026829663,0.0006904838,0.00007668736,0.00002411528],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000044290166,0.00011270031,0.000027250284,0.00026767424,0.00018276263,0.00074699725,0.00030545663,0.00019396732,0.000005298099],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0015878502,0.00024331703,0.43463552,0.00018436095,0.00018099789,0.00007653544,0.40052053,0.0013427181,0.00020605474,0.011571798,0.0063623213,0.14308798],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010723829,0.00006971961,0.4477041,0.00033404146,0.00007062565,0.0000157579,0.031804983,0.03430569,0.000007753759,0.0043915757,0.47979346,0.00042989344],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011523881,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14026684,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47343114,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000034964294,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011725479,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9950585},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2529410267","doi":"10.3138/9781442679368-005","title":"3. The Metis Land Grant","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of Toronto Press eBooks","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Metis; Land grant; Geography; Political science; Computer science; World Wide Web; Public administration","score_opus":0.022168247374900186,"score_gpt":0.22674623768589186,"score_spread":0.20457799031099166,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2529410267","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00001927542,0.0024055135,0.000008095771,0.00008198427,0.00017577277,0.00020359321,0.000035273515,0.000041186526,0.9970293],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00078352273,0.009630066,0.000022897906,0.000009949405,0.0001373626,1.15275675e-7,0.000003370843,0.0000090705225,0.98940367],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992276,0.00004196553,0.00009514565,0.00015990822,0.00032009336,0.0001553156],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99940956,0.00007613743,0.00013549735,0.00022029727,0.000079459576,0.000079052064],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00018095186,0.00011238995,0.00017418896,0.000008478445,0.00076820055,0.000031406074,0.00038284948,0.00020262349,0.00097027],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000033303977,0.000106033214,0.00015522349,4.89588e-7,0.00047041784,0.00006544851,0.000062162224,0.0001062032,0.000007907963],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012647014,0.0000073296214,0.0000048534343,0.000010264703,0.00015571009,0.000015813675,0.022962367,8.014649e-7,0.0000031638651,0.7853723,0.006122058,0.18521883],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001553583,0.00002742876,0.0000339741,0.00003935734,0.00008863562,2.9108233e-7,0.00011369145,0.0000018801279,0.0000031934792,0.0014674297,0.99795204,0.00011670414],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5034356,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4297771,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99183,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013989447,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008940378,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99994296},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2529422895","doi":"10.3138/9781442688469-007","title":"5. The Canada Land Law Amendment Association","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of Toronto Press eBooks","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Amendment; Law; Association (psychology); Political science; Psychology","score_opus":0.015973938374644028,"score_gpt":0.20490929150163698,"score_spread":0.18893535312699294,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2529422895","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000028095721,0.0009912783,0.0000021451478,0.00018351943,0.00031960435,0.0001756576,0.000049621434,0.000020548357,0.9982295],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0027780526,0.003972078,0.000007904526,0.00003455901,0.00013602385,1.357715e-7,0.0000055631085,0.000006646715,0.99305904],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990476,0.000039907485,0.000095842435,0.0001293644,0.00052793906,0.0001593641],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99926156,0.0001068852,0.000267587,0.0001471373,0.00014397889,0.000072849885],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00015694872,0.00009562886,0.00014809005,0.000003580474,0.0009806129,0.000020454263,0.00025105383,0.00016696483,0.00015028934],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000056403433,0.000098247896,0.00008062243,4.1849736e-7,0.0001701176,0.000053837328,0.000060195205,0.00010188329,0.0000012030508],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006675203,0.000009270222,0.00004301692,0.000013488533,0.0003161609,0.000025253956,0.022241691,0.000002862888,0.00000286811,0.8384807,0.12679249,0.012005412],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001388941,0.000014730442,0.000036775204,0.00002085141,0.000050097526,1.387103e-7,0.0001368687,0.000001287208,0.0000043958075,0.000096041294,0.999399,0.00010089994],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9980898,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99956185,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8726065,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018250361,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00043907785,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.75421804},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2530229452","doi":"10.7202/1100736ar","title":"La pratique judiciaire du droit international privé au Québec en 1997","year":2023,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue québécoise de droit international","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.01243789447304568,"score_gpt":0.2783358277303122,"score_spread":0.2658979332572665,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2530229452","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.38794634,0.0003055655,0.0010936018,0.16978338,0.010187465,0.00041182162,0.0003690908,0.000406058,0.42949668],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90425074,0.0026341886,0.00016930551,0.0011057405,0.008027275,0.00010973427,0.0003373564,0.00006357992,0.0833021],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99675775,0.0003640936,0.0007093567,0.00061591103,0.000908631,0.000644266],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978305,0.0007861689,0.00039017104,0.00029028353,0.00037950612,0.0003233791],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017669735,0.000316778,0.00034235453,0.00038656913,0.0004350151,0.0002649723,0.0011191152,0.0005125513,0.0017423596],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00094708614,0.00042949748,0.00037954707,0.00061645085,0.0004516158,0.0007118925,0.0002055759,0.0006367084,0.0014238129],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007679521,0.0003446372,0.02002577,0.00006716395,0.0004473295,0.00038752463,0.038140964,0.0003762038,0.00014726383,0.8226546,0.017572813,0.099758916],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005002441,0.000064826796,0.0463864,0.00038091693,0.00006903904,0.00016517937,0.0016392577,0.009357689,0.000028442151,0.012286782,0.92872214,0.00039908136],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.26642793,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4718692,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9111493,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0060661254,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035703424,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998157},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2532314227","doi":"","title":"Territorial Disputes and the Shifting Identity of Japan","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Identity (music); Political science; History; Genealogy; Aesthetics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.032591856113246456,"score_gpt":0.3245524393858084,"score_spread":0.29196058327256197,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2532314227","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.86613023,0.00006945077,0.0001413446,0.003886339,0.0011819919,0.0000863371,5.7910563e-7,0.000023047678,0.12848069],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984111,0.000017408478,0.00005415944,0.00002923649,0.00093020074,0.0000011400945,1.8992867e-7,0.0000010669795,0.00055550365],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995708,0.00006472556,0.000071307804,0.000043858636,0.00019011198,0.000059197682],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99976563,0.00008028263,0.000031334712,0.000042208143,0.000040744588,0.00003980365],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009704525,0.000020593512,0.000052013962,0.00000876215,0.00013386122,0.000053127802,0.00006832114,0.000021739777,0.00002495519],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021133499,0.000012688753,0.000017357432,0.00005390891,0.00024168566,0.00018780785,0.00003018848,0.000025398358,0.0000017141431],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031283726,0.000012317688,0.03871218,0.000002296636,0.000008321773,7.173512e-8,0.053389363,2.1656533e-7,0.00003205949,0.89921683,0.0009951735,0.007599893],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0043086,0.00011289805,0.07684913,0.000030605526,0.00006986913,8.8597227e-7,0.06420213,0.0003295335,0.0002875535,0.100260176,0.7533108,0.00023779228],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.025637425,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010695653,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.79895663,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000008571871,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003121,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98085093},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2538423588","doi":"10.1093/he/9780198752844.003.0009","title":"9. Exemption clauses","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Notice; Legislature; Law; Legislative intent; Freedom of contract; Interpretation (philosophy); Law and economics; Common law; Exclusion clause; Political science; Business; Economics; Contract management; Computer science","score_opus":0.04088603709561555,"score_gpt":0.2545576212885471,"score_spread":0.21367158419293153,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2538423588","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00023083917,0.000034403507,0.00009679314,0.000056752047,0.0004126108,0.00025050418,0.00003659776,0.00019225682,0.99868923],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0009519007,0.0008164841,0.000058677644,0.000043721295,0.0006850888,3.0676324e-7,0.000015131241,0.00002053783,0.99740815],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989866,0.00003987431,0.00010910701,0.00029173246,0.00034366443,0.00022899327],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992574,0.000037125777,0.0001645096,0.00024350463,0.00016113737,0.00013633135],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00016058153,0.00017545417,0.00018954556,0.00011529707,0.0006736177,0.00006691205,0.00032161886,0.00045019994,0.00080335385],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000063785337,0.00021626941,0.0001465793,0.0000063907555,0.00048135355,0.00012875663,0.00012682652,0.00021254692,0.000011109128],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000046080288,0.000005109851,0.0000047369135,0.0000109842495,0.0000471537,0.000018050727,0.0028704854,1.3885006e-7,0.0000040656746,0.97830975,0.009156826,0.009526623],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017084167,0.000046483496,0.000011089418,0.00006948929,0.0000985308,5.9187107e-7,0.00022058735,0.0000019927948,0.000010831425,0.0018528769,0.99728125,0.00023545245],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00072379905,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001088511,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98812443,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020840122,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001404919,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8819211},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2553277544","doi":"10.3917/rcdip.161.0051","title":"Le forum non conveniens en droit civil","year":2016,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue critique de droit international privé","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Choice of law; Humanities; Law; Conflict of laws; Philosophy","score_opus":0.01018021799764261,"score_gpt":0.28488523593729426,"score_spread":0.27470501793965163,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2553277544","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11503546,0.0010015947,0.061619505,0.43208808,0.007871157,0.0005046876,0.00029394618,0.0001674388,0.38141814],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89382124,0.0026171573,0.000297399,0.00127962,0.0027170572,0.000045092023,0.000020740483,0.00003738132,0.09916433],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997907,0.00018571441,0.0004546133,0.0004434281,0.00040786507,0.00060142175],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984994,0.00042872934,0.00018094496,0.00025421535,0.00037487334,0.0002618653],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000869262,0.00019689264,0.0002576327,0.00013293629,0.00026596972,0.00013275955,0.0006519266,0.0003635094,0.0017602019],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005005296,0.00023164834,0.0002680156,0.00016942594,0.00041671487,0.0007481784,0.0001318951,0.000265889,0.0005152919],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025239082,0.00016950458,0.0020920392,0.00004401361,0.00008074413,0.00006128299,0.0027609211,0.0000044302546,0.0019569993,0.93529403,0.005806021,0.051704764],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00064158475,0.00008376302,0.0029494225,0.00067835744,0.000032203712,0.00008334981,0.0006875367,0.00053638115,0.00092388666,0.1337117,0.8593587,0.0003130737],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019202933,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0039989604,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8535527,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010485874,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00048749833,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991523},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2561025339","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198728689.013.18","title":"Roman Courts and Private Arbitration","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Arbitration; Arbiter; Publicity; Mediation; Adjudication; Political science; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.022266278392846343,"score_gpt":0.22940283366296163,"score_spread":0.2071365552701153,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2561025339","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0006728305,0.00003909564,0.00014905498,0.0001403422,0.00016094641,0.00025639983,0.00003151311,0.000098948054,0.9984509],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0043119793,0.0009318516,0.000043512096,0.00004085925,0.00022825929,2.9143536e-7,0.0000053928557,0.000014361424,0.9944235],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992163,0.000029899264,0.00009106656,0.00024881633,0.00024130683,0.00017257693],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999472,0.00003802692,0.00014079316,0.0001566606,0.000065802,0.00012671648],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00013200905,0.00014542535,0.00015920923,0.00007755447,0.0005018056,0.00005916163,0.00016070812,0.00029598668,0.000071995244],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000004276562,0.0001517563,0.000068574634,0.0000024768663,0.00029778978,0.00013603434,0.00009208395,0.00014418368,0.0000010821573],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025886551,0.0000023217158,0.0000070155993,0.00000867694,0.000030423249,0.000016437885,0.00086127885,3.839306e-8,0.000014005494,0.9863898,0.000357523,0.012286582],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022756615,0.000030575968,0.000043207703,0.00008035784,0.00006516002,8.444514e-7,0.00002930898,0.0000021013805,0.00001230046,0.0069448063,0.99237376,0.00019001841],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00019239675,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00030421253,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99201626,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012468788,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000090653244,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6188443},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2566536109","doi":"10.7202/1038259ar","title":"La méthode conflictuelle dans le projet de code civil camerounais : contribution à la systématisation de l’évolution des méthodes en droit international privé","year":2016,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.016514232589054555,"score_gpt":0.2773077953057261,"score_spread":0.26079356271667153,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2566536109","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.46703672,0.00041000627,0.5130977,0.0025652105,0.00038658574,0.00031651132,0.00016260473,0.00014060781,0.015884047],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9799548,0.0023826887,0.0056482437,0.00017758737,0.00066021783,0.000119061,0.00006771176,0.000048539663,0.010941184],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99439687,0.003147398,0.00053141755,0.00048717397,0.00056283094,0.0008743094],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99709034,0.0016569945,0.00038297958,0.00024982405,0.00030381445,0.0003160489],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006368904,0.00030915663,0.0003491322,0.00016590678,0.0009262699,0.00025155113,0.0004559701,0.0010148957,0.00022814817],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016729253,0.0003303635,0.00021800019,0.00031929614,0.0025757342,0.0008149759,0.00006441847,0.00050562667,0.000044389257],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011349016,0.00020474658,0.042096972,0.000091387126,0.00017873914,0.00003242445,0.03773574,0.000081394224,0.019826422,0.824276,0.00030081967,0.075061925],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0041446467,0.00029771618,0.2147056,0.001701897,0.00048805907,0.00051676686,0.012810475,0.012353416,0.012517765,0.3100831,0.42905685,0.001323735],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01076648,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010921389,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5141929,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008697445,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00079213956,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999148},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2566894245","doi":"","title":"Vienašaliai sandoriai paveldėjimo teisėje: valios išreiškimo forma ir teisinės pasekmės","year":2008,"lang":"lt","type":"article","venue":"Jurisprudencija","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Renunciation; Successor cardinal; Ecological succession; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Philosophy; Sociology; Mathematics; Theology","score_opus":0.03557778837050062,"score_gpt":0.29839088022680055,"score_spread":0.2628130918562999,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2566894245","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7372426,0.00494827,0.0004041359,0.008585142,0.010236115,0.0021779207,0.0001704603,0.00072469545,0.23551068],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9472413,0.008293575,0.0002761437,0.0011806514,0.007130238,0.00012536622,0.000041086158,0.00012622568,0.03558541],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9898154,0.0011188921,0.0016532165,0.0014857553,0.0033561252,0.0025705853],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995074,0.00072331296,0.000724636,0.0013567236,0.0010060227,0.0011153072],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036986575,0.00092672155,0.0011780533,0.0006848309,0.005395525,0.0004903392,0.0015181958,0.0012310272,0.0030743137],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005528327,0.0009187503,0.0008922014,0.0027459613,0.0018162131,0.0015064506,0.00044266463,0.0015536373,0.003996329],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006384717,0.003059864,0.031573933,0.0004341299,0.00073604134,0.002022459,0.18626088,0.00005510238,0.0023819366,0.036897745,0.66068023,0.075259194],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018424839,0.00058854395,0.021151269,0.00027465064,0.00020037002,0.0001354004,0.004805949,0.0001296119,0.0014406579,0.0015786435,0.9666065,0.0012459118],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008978206,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012542533,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.30592626,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008116412,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018223362,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993263},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2574434222","doi":"","title":"Family Maintenance Enforcement Act. : Canada. Province of B. C. 2002","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"神戸学院法学","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Enforcement; Business; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.010749480463000075,"score_gpt":0.24405926740811867,"score_spread":0.2333097869451186,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2574434222","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08207044,0.000062574574,0.0005383992,0.0017319344,0.00047837742,0.00018751487,0.000006098313,0.00003208875,0.91489255],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9684114,0.00004391632,0.000072716386,0.00039943488,0.00014486093,0.000004057085,0.0000010889946,0.000003958025,0.030918553],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99918336,0.000042950738,0.0001365158,0.00010621695,0.0003237317,0.00020720462],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996045,0.00004073508,0.00008091132,0.0001251851,0.000075009164,0.00007361762],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003226393,0.000053227333,0.000093097005,0.00001622958,0.00014817508,0.000013893386,0.00014422895,0.000033066844,0.00044142583],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000073524054,0.000049379745,0.000025065265,0.00007380362,0.00007807376,0.000050333656,0.000020062113,0.00004712441,0.000013629039],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005163793,0.00010351148,0.0070469785,0.0000625526,0.000041767275,0.000010185343,0.005679977,0.00010050802,0.0015993285,0.4182149,0.38910034,0.17798834],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000113242946,0.000027056307,0.0073562628,0.000015026944,0.0000041960993,1.3121817e-7,0.00031944283,0.000103625694,0.00016773563,0.00011745848,0.9917122,0.00006358834],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7288304,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8726359,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.886341,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011423343,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00059789576,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.48333034},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2581053164","doi":"","title":"After The Hague: Some Thoughts On The Impact On Canadian Law Of The Convention on Choice Of Court Agreements","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"NSUWorks (Nova Southeastern University)","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Convention; Political science; Choice of law; Conflict of laws","score_opus":0.022179899259934775,"score_gpt":0.2574662220360747,"score_spread":0.23528632277613995,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2581053164","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.85591024,0.000019350573,0.00001036901,0.0035692488,0.00044311487,0.00039227205,0.00007872019,0.000013161215,0.13956352],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9899652,0.0000057464053,7.2075227e-7,0.00023875678,0.0003730912,7.1101806e-7,0.0000027818792,0.000008202026,0.009404764],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99871325,0.00027374568,0.00014088488,0.00016562115,0.00044084887,0.00026562536],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991382,0.00015948706,0.00018367628,0.00035695347,0.000091184265,0.00007049907],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00032804534,0.00012942772,0.00012857481,0.000110273984,0.0005607594,0.00003861733,0.00046520197,0.0001143161,0.0001316141],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000012186308,0.00007140377,0.00019582726,0.0003789372,0.00038454361,0.00009743634,0.000036248337,0.00022109416,0.000030519863],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001296507,0.00067385053,0.12447576,0.000023811177,0.00033174752,0.000024358458,0.01745511,0.0018313191,0.00014713912,0.8472352,0.0018207318,0.004684481],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019215245,0.0005636256,0.4731246,0.0006886789,0.00022283607,9.999355e-7,0.012920587,0.0002460547,0.0006554572,0.0031491271,0.50601166,0.00049485284],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.25710446,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3313893,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84408605,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016602695,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013316252,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.74784255},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2583551081","doi":"10.1017/9781316681060.004","title":"Customary Norms <i>vs</i> State Law","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"State (computer science); Content (measure theory); Law; Political science; Computer science; Internet privacy; Computer security; Mathematics; Algorithm","score_opus":0.02465987583544364,"score_gpt":0.23503692008788662,"score_spread":0.210377044252443,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2583551081","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00009775022,0.000084964886,0.000035009944,0.00012263669,0.00069091487,0.00038917936,0.00028142647,0.00022396928,0.9980742],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0032707213,0.0005493578,0.0000134929005,0.00018840599,0.00043037464,5.4190167e-7,0.00003324058,0.000037304697,0.99547654],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99846035,0.000052206386,0.00016057184,0.0004547808,0.00048386175,0.00038821442],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998456,0.000053982672,0.00034250686,0.00064587983,0.00020975983,0.00029188645],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00024572882,0.00029669987,0.00037153042,0.000096799784,0.0017844603,0.0001945326,0.0008244486,0.00042307793,0.000018452789],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000008711705,0.0003550077,0.0002630352,0.0000034906595,0.0010898679,0.0002650809,0.00032567602,0.00046729014,0.00005455141],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000080065984,0.0000066483644,0.0000029212483,0.000024857873,0.00007749734,0.00023409465,0.00060868263,3.067623e-7,0.0000057641323,0.95858216,0.036130484,0.0042465134],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003512019,0.000036359797,0.00002191121,0.000108656255,0.0001242033,0.0000023580012,0.00005045334,0.0000024882168,0.000033615208,0.000069093825,0.9987889,0.00041079015],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013554744,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011888265,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9626584,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002878104,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000274117,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998902},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W25849069","doi":"10.1186/s12931-015-0201-y","title":"The Administration of Justice in Commercial Disputes / L'administration de la justice et les litiges commerciaux (M.Pilkington, J.M.Spence, H.Dumont, dir.)","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Administration (probate law); Economic Justice; Administration of justice; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.02396279633155077,"score_gpt":0.33312699498151305,"score_spread":0.30916419864996225,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W25849069","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91012436,0.00048271116,0.0013465078,0.009931473,0.00028939114,0.00033264124,0.000018721197,0.00006524067,0.07740893],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9946897,0.0033315383,0.00027514386,0.00018320412,0.0005154595,0.000033556746,0.000022340299,0.0000140190405,0.00093501434],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99804324,0.0006585531,0.00042502256,0.00020848717,0.0002799625,0.00038475372],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99790704,0.0014190556,0.00023858703,0.00020971755,0.000109998284,0.00011558875],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022878787,0.00011370295,0.00020469472,0.000072353825,0.00069576764,0.00019471957,0.00032537925,0.00021389639,0.000035657486],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00070642424,0.00013775515,0.00008791809,0.00037204305,0.00041512976,0.00028051986,0.000030345022,0.00031932766,0.0000048273014],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007030715,0.0007277813,0.1284823,0.00030584287,0.000041394353,0.00014071501,0.025050621,0.000156674,0.0011440675,0.75804764,0.001645208,0.083554685],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006435264,0.0003097432,0.8117285,0.00031816316,0.0002624726,0.000066693145,0.0095002195,0.0008697209,0.00057120586,0.015260057,0.1600947,0.00037503405],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026808614,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.038751688,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7427876,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017412631,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00040325572,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9787886},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2585497728","doi":"10.1017/9781316681060.011","title":"Grassroots Law in Context","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Grassroots; Context (archaeology); Law; Political science; Sociology; Law and economics; Geography; Archaeology; Politics","score_opus":0.036075958759389286,"score_gpt":0.2523282722211582,"score_spread":0.21625231346176893,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2585497728","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00020282964,0.00012651905,0.000012617385,0.00009957472,0.00045025718,0.0003514184,0.000075369186,0.000087505614,0.9985939],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.05631933,0.00023472516,0.000004722492,0.000078450386,0.00023705326,4.6938385e-7,0.00001256891,0.000019914927,0.94309276],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998845,0.000055766734,0.00013922827,0.00035633918,0.00031197388,0.00029173406],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99900514,0.00005519191,0.00022599225,0.00042759467,0.00012118174,0.00016492452],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00023549573,0.00020909544,0.00031670547,0.00011747371,0.0007991574,0.000112469024,0.0005848047,0.00045760543,0.00001654794],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000013586163,0.00027120428,0.0001672174,0.0000030336853,0.00076378015,0.00016282876,0.00017739343,0.0003976173,0.000024798941],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034323828,0.0000060070615,0.000010946883,0.000012047505,0.000027782196,0.00019520873,0.0006637374,9.3761855e-8,0.0000026291088,0.9878898,0.006107376,0.0050500063],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00042620453,0.000019659876,0.0000737919,0.00015256445,0.000050645463,0.0000010004312,0.0001615477,0.000001893743,0.000011052843,0.000079766665,0.99873984,0.00028205046],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.030036079,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012600272,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99263245,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030961685,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018862297,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999974},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2587009173","doi":"","title":"A Distant Export: The New Zealand Experience with a North American Style Personal Property Security Regime","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"ResearchSpace (University of Auckland)","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Style (visual arts); Property (philosophy); Geography; Business; Economy; Political science; History; Economics; Archaeology","score_opus":0.014154367921714404,"score_gpt":0.2530403542025865,"score_spread":0.23888598628087213,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2587009173","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97216105,0.000041776348,0.0001835624,0.018176867,0.000016888756,0.00028488517,0.00001247065,0.000042649324,0.00907986],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96633434,0.00019293091,0.000098268,0.0000139606345,0.00010118509,6.896756e-7,0.000006218189,0.000005879735,0.033246536],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983567,0.00014039861,0.00006571639,0.00024385424,0.0008171455,0.0003761584],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99925834,0.00007798131,0.000119836826,0.000203497,0.00014582003,0.00019454544],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003597806,0.00009020766,0.00016251086,0.00006962369,0.00087599957,0.00005928812,0.00032109517,0.000031033233,0.00016895599],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003476338,0.000059339505,0.000064335334,0.0006425663,0.0014175915,0.00024918118,0.00008235456,0.00018955175,0.000008207773],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013043823,0.0002984758,0.4182505,0.0000282935,0.0000791738,0.00017810488,0.46996018,0.000009446837,0.0002812494,0.0026584056,0.097047344,0.00990445],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000607737,0.00029670648,0.27170917,0.000026944563,0.00001599671,0.0000036374468,0.079245076,0.00017527581,0.00001755934,0.000064846136,0.647676,0.0001610527],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2767217,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3805312,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.55062866,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000103731196,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00046959252,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7280947},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2593858148","doi":"","title":"Panel 6. Achieving Efficient and Effective Settlements Under the OSC's New No-Contest Settlement Scheme","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"CONTEST; Settlement (finance); Human settlement; Scheme (mathematics); Computer science; Geography; Mathematics; Political science; Archaeology; World Wide Web; Law","score_opus":0.05175315742170448,"score_gpt":0.3184664979056069,"score_spread":0.2667133404839024,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2593858148","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.80081004,0.0003403699,0.0019871895,0.02686692,0.0009639037,0.00141022,0.000011478429,0.00017172443,0.16743813],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99216247,0.000025092515,0.0002508624,0.0012488728,0.00042867957,0.000021604146,0.0000048037714,0.000008832613,0.0058487854],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987655,0.00015069758,0.00014653153,0.00021226188,0.0004421119,0.0002828952],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999289,0.00016068647,0.00006149055,0.00014549088,0.00011176748,0.0002315713],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011149639,0.00010951832,0.000107297055,0.0000304996,0.00049065345,0.00015623511,0.0001421516,0.00005039908,0.00021197741],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010724861,0.00007384372,0.00003819222,0.00013592902,0.00014056012,0.00009858041,0.00009534737,0.00010869167,0.0001115456],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003397689,0.0008105828,0.1625988,0.00005306589,0.00058042986,0.000013119499,0.15237333,0.0004295725,0.0033078007,0.3480701,0.13835563,0.19306779],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0019738898,0.00027108318,0.1299625,0.000049314633,0.000059889648,0.000001965954,0.02184875,0.000580302,0.00021958347,0.000854304,0.8438226,0.0003558184],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004888721,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015828458,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.705467,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016060637,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014875126,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7390316},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2599096538","doi":"","title":"Intellectual Property: The Law in Canada Daniel Gervais & Elizabeth F. Judge (Toronto: Thomson Carswell, 2006)","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Property (philosophy); Law; Real property; Law and economics; History; Sociology; Political science; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.014145441240156598,"score_gpt":0.24746705625402005,"score_spread":0.23332161501386345,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2599096538","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15947579,0.0036548744,0.000035107376,0.0091593275,0.0013795672,0.00083232915,0.000044383323,0.0001428753,0.8252757],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97506636,0.00034181194,0.00004372351,0.002455375,0.0009051368,0.000047412,0.000014538969,0.000028221879,0.021097401],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99744606,0.00034987938,0.00040199366,0.00039330946,0.0007221176,0.0006866106],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989876,0.0002163218,0.00010285043,0.0003896189,0.000115281226,0.00018833393],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007942775,0.00022078288,0.00026642616,0.000020054309,0.0009432153,0.00022984807,0.00053497375,0.00013859686,0.0012418691],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010638119,0.00015102663,0.000088310255,0.00028820804,0.00036722652,0.00044510327,0.000085902546,0.0003727228,0.00007726825],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011761195,0.00026329287,0.014178737,0.000035493984,0.00006467368,0.00008129316,0.015535494,0.00020621289,0.00052609085,0.48580387,0.46973252,0.013454721],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029071578,0.000033855766,0.0021278032,0.000030514464,0.000015663467,0.0000018609043,0.0028297675,0.00009351317,0.00023282185,0.00058719824,0.99350655,0.00024971212],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9993401,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9998934,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.81559056,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014584095,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013466679,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996711},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2601680162","doi":"10.54648/aila2013011","title":"Summary of MC99 Judicial Decisions 2012","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Air and Space Law","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Liability; Convention; Political science; China; Law; Judicial review; Judicial opinion","score_opus":0.017621990479683478,"score_gpt":0.282594284359484,"score_spread":0.26497229387980054,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2601680162","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.40923816,0.00080609473,0.00013008664,0.013889165,0.00033585407,0.00019401057,0.0000049208606,0.000042099964,0.5753596],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99430484,0.0006545915,0.00011041186,0.0003173374,0.00018004721,0.000004078468,0.0000010781488,0.0000032270575,0.0044243997],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99952483,0.00003345131,0.000081791935,0.00008062784,0.00014967946,0.0001295934],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996503,0.00010333945,0.000030866202,0.00007413731,0.000054630626,0.000086699736],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00015601321,0.000040989293,0.000086462176,0.000019856212,0.00026630558,0.000021152267,0.000057468274,0.000057348967,0.0003833553],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000027659296,0.000036239406,0.000032424272,0.00007798059,0.0002342519,0.00023085627,0.00002518955,0.000044537963,0.000036290847],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000096315125,0.000052610412,0.006954497,0.000004333415,0.00001404901,9.815851e-7,0.0060587954,0.0000011154219,0.0004323241,0.91277415,0.044773906,0.028923605],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012664711,0.000035437726,0.02059325,0.000016591326,0.000008673723,2.6723546e-7,0.0009384255,0.0000089354435,0.00011519546,0.0107437465,0.9673503,0.00006254671],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.026746769,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010704211,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92257637,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000007354302,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000025789926,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9797342},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2604224154","doi":"","title":"Commercial Free Speech – A Critical Reconsideration","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Doctrine; Commercial speech; Supreme court; Proportionality (law); Political science; Free speech; Law; Constitutional law; European union; Law and economics; Sociology; First amendment; Business; International trade","score_opus":0.02024164898825469,"score_gpt":0.31915758254302684,"score_spread":0.29891593355477214,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2604224154","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.48060614,0.0015418264,0.03960723,0.3574366,0.0031782363,0.00034046627,0.000010150041,0.00023086039,0.11704847],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9916181,0.0024615643,0.00011482578,0.00024388522,0.0018917912,0.000002444069,3.0384706e-7,0.000009214952,0.0036578665],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99773943,0.00021638471,0.00019582051,0.00012252362,0.0003358944,0.0013899229],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99933255,0.00022345834,0.000059895927,0.00011670204,0.00015164362,0.000115776114],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025102515,0.00007383169,0.00010045733,0.000064523745,0.00086144975,0.000108540145,0.00019766993,0.00009475534,0.000535191],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010051877,0.000054631066,0.00008229786,0.0000905369,0.00016785182,0.00039569678,0.000021289488,0.0005379391,0.00007521721],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022642243,0.000025883566,0.000961394,4.5108573e-7,0.000015914933,0.0000028008408,0.0005684078,3.370671e-8,0.0002713067,0.7243326,0.001376776,0.27242184],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005947451,0.00018341337,0.001138062,0.000022715398,0.0000207866,0.00013564003,0.0014114236,0.000001889642,0.00010718947,0.8251124,0.17113538,0.00013632335],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000680524,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.041587014,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.51101196,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007890454,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020844424,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97590154},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2605620558","doi":"","title":"Chronique de droit international privé canadien (2010-2015): Droit civil québécois (1re partie)","year":2016,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Journal du droit international","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.011501177208589461,"score_gpt":0.26523336973458317,"score_spread":0.2537321925259937,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2605620558","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.34889758,0.0018993863,0.027899954,0.35818633,0.05356901,0.00050633063,0.00054699084,0.0001873206,0.20830712],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7784114,0.0067367167,0.00037043955,0.001391004,0.014887805,0.000033431035,0.00002826908,0.00006435908,0.19807658],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99513274,0.00027390278,0.0011251816,0.00058245397,0.0017912856,0.0010944555],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963588,0.00032889453,0.000911125,0.00030261246,0.0011399386,0.000958602],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021893417,0.00040602818,0.00041632238,0.00043597614,0.00071978563,0.0005867623,0.0015958726,0.00046579854,0.020808948],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00069508806,0.0004028838,0.00052282383,0.00028936478,0.000610385,0.001847677,0.00019850234,0.0008002402,0.0006174331],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00033092438,0.0009210729,0.051298503,0.000035221397,0.0015933235,0.0009073588,0.01356219,0.0001640785,0.0011983003,0.5374669,0.2145451,0.17797703],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014654465,0.00017894387,0.024692347,0.0005620255,0.000089540525,0.0013587901,0.0005773798,0.0012724585,0.00014078741,0.048062656,0.9210679,0.0005317566],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.033795033,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2104307,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.70652276,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00939219,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022113028,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998423},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2605904935","doi":"","title":"LibGuides: Authorised Law Reports: What are Authorised Reports?","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"libguides","venue":"","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Internet privacy; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.040484555912580815,"score_gpt":0.32408001643743467,"score_spread":0.28359546052485385,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2605904935","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00036281144,0.0130866105,0.00013036915,0.011384384,0.039488595,0.0014665225,0.000038044345,0.0017453902,0.9322973],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.04024336,0.01791722,0.0013274921,0.003641001,0.026990056,0.0003311032,0.0007686431,0.0003542823,0.9084268],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99228513,0.0005153081,0.0021427085,0.0013751865,0.0022262556,0.0014553852],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9935587,0.00034652164,0.0027275688,0.001659335,0.00077577936,0.0009320615],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004861885,0.0007835847,0.001268034,0.00033411244,0.001922578,0.0020055128,0.000533518,0.002070881,0.010131149],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009171486,0.00074597244,0.0007958399,0.0006895998,0.00071476627,0.0027886655,0.0002401202,0.0010393192,0.00017140064],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019789224,0.00017921257,0.00094717625,0.00015241021,0.00023725313,0.0012095375,0.010776139,0.000001482593,0.000011643305,0.022441434,0.94792706,0.016096864],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012259012,0.00004524736,0.00020644408,0.00061285344,0.00029549902,0.00008823136,0.009393124,0.0000024837727,0.000050860795,0.0034458372,0.9847911,0.0009457114],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03433686,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01109143,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03988055,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00059441617,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009792838,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99949914},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2610771774","doi":"10.2307/j.ctt1w1vmdn.13","title":"United States Participation in Drafting Paris Convention 1919","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"MQUP eBooks","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"International Air Transport Association","funders":"","keywords":"Convention; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.048592260297859936,"score_gpt":0.3406177031735707,"score_spread":0.29202544287571075,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2610771774","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008065872,0.00006648169,0.000039314895,0.00036838604,0.0004300811,0.00034073566,0.000009701586,0.00008914438,0.9905903],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.20979474,0.00020572433,0.000019471903,0.000103197606,0.00038374224,0.0000248665,0.00012968616,0.000029094854,0.7893095],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99873954,0.00006657389,0.0003330455,0.0002511081,0.00033818386,0.0002715668],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99911016,0.000074844844,0.0003742187,0.00023662904,0.00011552558,0.000088647976],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006874259,0.00016562447,0.00022843132,0.00021805671,0.0005849404,0.00016116648,0.00015921646,0.00032549677,0.00031566634],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000048218495,0.00018459659,0.0000960592,0.000011321468,0.0002250905,0.0000886423,0.000043066997,0.00026987263,0.00008158957],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000823187,0.00005030588,0.001760172,0.00008951317,0.000112195434,0.000060064867,0.09152454,0.00003306842,0.000060446244,0.69734544,0.0014381828,0.20744376],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023425203,0.000031391704,0.00046536763,0.00022162199,0.00003904707,1.8882662e-7,0.00023018825,0.00013577405,0.000023644727,0.013225606,0.9851818,0.00021111772],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010462315,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016444003,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9837436,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001508321,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010760813,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9961271},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2610894389","doi":"10.34961/19056","title":"Legislative comment: family property division under the Family Law Act 2011","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Limerick Institutional Repository (University of Limerick)","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Division (mathematics); Legislature; Property (philosophy); Law; Legislative history; Family law; Law and economics; Political science; Business; Sociology; Philosophy; Mathematics; Arithmetic","score_opus":0.03595816700906779,"score_gpt":0.24571314538606848,"score_spread":0.2097549783770007,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2610894389","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3437453,0.00030419044,0.004948114,0.0062891697,0.00079869095,0.00046155596,0.000041746778,0.00008209953,0.64332914],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9906638,0.00044281242,0.00047710844,0.00017027884,0.00008137093,7.7611226e-8,0.000010586581,0.0000067300325,0.00814722],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99819493,0.00025346453,0.00016885911,0.00035103742,0.0007470113,0.00028472338],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980492,0.00013276582,0.00066168443,0.0005575886,0.00043381535,0.00016494267],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.000408583,0.00017972168,0.00032121388,0.000087150125,0.0095275,0.000060344297,0.0012530439,0.0001597057,0.00014337864],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000018818702,0.0001693959,0.0002816975,0.00015448872,0.005686676,0.0013081151,0.0004212002,0.00024501572,0.00004633371],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0028004888,0.0024910038,0.020906813,0.00014156662,0.0022474031,0.0005286022,0.10875925,0.0017750373,0.041643545,0.7770647,0.02342431,0.018217323],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009325121,0.0003046938,0.11832996,0.000098791264,0.00019296193,0.000004446,0.04158297,0.00019776351,0.00014735985,0.00012343097,0.83778083,0.0003042617],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.15567407,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015229651,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.81435657,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025199147,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000666122,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9970193},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2612569314","doi":"","title":"Beyond Convergence and the New Media Decisions: Regulatory Models in Communications Law","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Convergence (economics); Law; Business; Computer science; Law and economics; Political science; Economics","score_opus":0.035926426187780025,"score_gpt":0.29242761609655477,"score_spread":0.25650118990877474,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2612569314","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10637211,0.016358325,0.0007505128,0.02020058,0.00097157125,0.0009686213,0.00001364905,0.00014496727,0.8542197],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9924837,0.003324902,0.0011475268,0.0015600191,0.00009355533,0.000025677602,0.0000029633413,0.0000091726915,0.001352487],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984603,0.00048341087,0.00027365988,0.00019773794,0.00034529992,0.00023960498],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99813175,0.0008478456,0.00007569269,0.00064986467,0.00006989667,0.0002249765],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015907258,0.000097164164,0.00016672048,0.00003398133,0.0008642998,0.00012573993,0.0004645844,0.00010924396,0.00026204195],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004141882,0.00007938311,0.000052819396,0.00027519529,0.0011439123,0.00046406846,0.00009207801,0.0002484046,0.00004370553],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011304726,0.000018030192,0.0002961994,7.498743e-7,0.000005333462,6.486713e-7,0.005067434,0.000019198578,0.000009873537,0.9925523,0.0009190539,0.0010999],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00085873593,0.0000068443173,0.0008903158,0.000030054282,0.000012803117,0.0000013201213,0.0015686412,0.00021136884,0.000024205625,0.50697774,0.4893004,0.00011753681],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022175899,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14304294,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88611156,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000624367,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021425364,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98433554},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2613195154","doi":"10.29173/alr1305","title":"Turning Lead into Gold: The Uncertain Alchemy of All Obligations Clauses","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Debtor; Bankruptcy; Obligation; Law and economics; Business; Order (exchange); Law; Property (philosophy); Unjust enrichment; Alchemy; Economics; Political science; Creditor; Restitution; Finance; Debt","score_opus":0.04283342699370961,"score_gpt":0.3567925954943779,"score_spread":0.3139591685006683,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2613195154","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.038239922,0.14710465,0.00022614813,0.20288604,0.0006603536,0.002142928,0.0000052643663,0.00011938927,0.6086153],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9246292,0.0631902,0.00030076693,0.009053066,0.00023055384,0.000067509136,0.000022275246,0.000016219254,0.002490172],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989559,0.00013722916,0.00030431844,0.00014917189,0.00026426217,0.0001891398],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990893,0.0003492778,0.00016240074,0.00024441446,0.00009391865,0.000060707705],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00062554015,0.00009420428,0.000216658,0.000015126013,0.00031458554,0.000035969075,0.0002840934,0.000054298514,0.0001703129],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00032563377,0.000065919216,0.00013427541,0.00032993566,0.00030335347,0.00017655031,0.000034711993,0.000108959226,0.00007843277],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000013445758,0.000034595625,0.00013360585,0.0002297894,0.00003561603,5.528248e-7,0.007199775,0.00001214229,0.00019939948,0.9815356,0.001094933,0.009522606],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000089145215,0.000018970986,0.00009856103,0.001141253,0.00008365484,0.0000011603801,0.0001957141,0.0000015473724,0.000101804384,0.003789016,0.9943924,0.000086775704],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13459517,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10617123,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99329746,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006589062,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001241317,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9101388},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2613457364","doi":"","title":"L’OMPI: transposition en droit canadien des Traités Internet de 1996","year":2014,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de propriété intellectuelle","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Transposition (logic); Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.011816714546310149,"score_gpt":0.24429002914935985,"score_spread":0.2324733146030497,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2613457364","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8122505,0.002791221,0.06606478,0.004488729,0.0008780835,0.00045835145,0.00002503681,0.00016586384,0.11287742],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9287908,0.0011623699,0.0016969999,0.00083819777,0.0008225043,0.000046476518,0.000019296165,0.000060002716,0.06656335],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99631387,0.0011287744,0.00047008094,0.0005296108,0.0004092331,0.001148448],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983563,0.0005375648,0.00014070951,0.00025753936,0.00014796664,0.0005599385],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016938115,0.0003558962,0.00039798915,0.00019039825,0.0008604404,0.00016240412,0.00053348934,0.0008686301,0.0028083886],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00043604578,0.00040785872,0.0002972964,0.00055566104,0.0019853269,0.00027226546,0.000033759356,0.0010377615,0.0001601259],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022246486,0.00027688243,0.002374032,0.0002711186,0.00021764626,0.000035520017,0.32162696,0.00014356777,0.0024399166,0.12381868,0.0019115281,0.5466617],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012519867,0.001699541,0.004273518,0.00070868694,0.0005034448,0.00017794226,0.012730542,0.029595463,0.019699942,0.059097975,0.8690445,0.0012164795],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.056908015,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.058750287,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86713296,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002934011,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003582852,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99983734},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2613804343","doi":"10.1017/9781316471203.004","title":"Legal Systems and Presumptions of Unity and Validity","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Law and economics; Psychology; Philosophy; Sociology","score_opus":0.0637927309348264,"score_gpt":0.2641489172887685,"score_spread":0.2003561863539421,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2613804343","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004749243,0.00022052974,0.000043184646,0.00002544282,0.0002646745,0.00032994867,0.00028316182,0.00004515509,0.99403864],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.09047105,0.00090037484,0.0000068796267,0.0000033071879,0.00014510265,3.1287513e-7,0.000008573351,0.000009485647,0.9084549],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991835,0.00008085576,0.00011889801,0.0002469338,0.00022586022,0.00014396674],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990265,0.000078822595,0.00027340668,0.0002940157,0.00016675457,0.00016054133],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00027742467,0.00014817709,0.00027910207,0.00008533618,0.0008911282,0.000111447756,0.00021894577,0.00029218505,0.0000023165335],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000022615794,0.00017914223,0.00006812845,0.0000022758945,0.00096814963,0.00016124139,0.00020084811,0.00022103624,6.638412e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023857468,0.0000045916986,0.00004418172,0.00008387335,0.000047700727,0.000018071774,0.0003942105,2.0289136e-7,0.000009185052,0.9964985,0.0021994216,0.00067618815],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022602733,0.000031482065,0.00049837795,0.00013868784,0.0001751193,0.0000033869408,0.00015107478,0.000013592385,0.000007989033,0.00001546913,0.9985705,0.0001683015],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01643029,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00026519588,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.996483,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006629129,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013436358,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9901194},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W261386153","doi":"","title":"Introduction to Symposium on International Forum Shopping","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Texas international law journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Jurisdiction; Forum shopping; Economic Justice; Pride; Plaintiff; Principle of legality; Personal jurisdiction; Political science; Legislature; Sociology","score_opus":0.02131975852613543,"score_gpt":0.2982042085360114,"score_spread":0.27688445000987594,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W261386153","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006949062,0.00002074849,0.0010092824,0.348512,0.010801102,0.00010681127,0.000008329902,0.00007213455,0.63252056],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9437382,0.00023837804,0.0004502286,0.0039757085,0.018418632,0.0000059523927,0.00000838759,0.00001725959,0.033147234],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99805945,0.000076697674,0.00032523615,0.00024025803,0.0010082101,0.0002901641],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990972,0.000058344118,0.00014557398,0.00011781404,0.0003658002,0.00021523055],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005894753,0.000119368844,0.00010577345,0.0002390942,0.00077095174,0.00047395853,0.00053055875,0.00007652611,0.010880191],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016938665,0.0001200455,0.000118577955,0.00013672536,0.000088820154,0.00057742116,0.000060386483,0.00032101,0.0009120713],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007524257,0.0001839774,0.0012711661,9.4594407e-7,0.00011198159,0.000020690475,0.0017477837,0.0005538754,0.000422651,0.8189633,0.15174793,0.02490045],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002826712,0.00008411833,0.0004675711,0.000029168517,0.0000073381534,0.000056198314,0.00037621317,0.00038761133,0.00012010778,0.0013423207,0.9967102,0.00013651702],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003045146,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010009598,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93678916,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00052802084,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000021049082,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99986583},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2614125479","doi":"10.1002/iir.1267","title":"The Inherent Power of Common Law Courts to Provide Assistance in Cross‐Border Insolvencies: From Comity to Complexity","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Insolvency Review","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Comity; Insolvency; Statutory law; Law; Legislature; Power (physics); Common law; Commission; Law and economics; Position (finance); Political science; Economics; Jurisdiction; Business; Finance","score_opus":0.0806527052875713,"score_gpt":0.4639371395023051,"score_spread":0.3832844342147338,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2614125479","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.72209436,0.012069811,0.00018649932,0.065328434,0.0026895874,0.0021698251,0.00026351446,0.000049954255,0.195148],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9914898,0.0048861126,0.00019889195,0.0025338153,0.00011951251,0.000093842544,0.000008903043,0.000008466673,0.00066061603],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981452,0.0001472244,0.0005804354,0.00025653507,0.0006516142,0.00021894368],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998382,0.0002000796,0.0003770744,0.0005303616,0.00039132853,0.000119163546],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012366391,0.00012480066,0.00031412003,0.00003068459,0.00072293275,0.00032253843,0.0010891915,0.000056134304,0.00042043306],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006801645,0.00010080263,0.00011754011,0.00009484194,0.00042856042,0.0003202888,0.00023382313,0.00016444009,0.000046801902],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021871665,0.00079806783,0.18516056,0.00022925856,0.00014242915,0.000014155481,0.010595695,0.000017391687,0.0001696989,0.721437,0.01255446,0.068662584],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013915013,0.0000288478,0.18584388,0.0013422801,0.000006240032,2.0299179e-7,0.00006808788,0.000007686649,0.000023954499,0.003662387,0.80877656,0.00010071824],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.032288395,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1283838,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7962221,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023219606,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012128231,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97415566},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2622758090","doi":"","title":"Research Guides: Remedies: Remedies - Canada","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"libguides","venue":"","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Medicine","score_opus":0.14902050531228522,"score_gpt":0.44166164029390664,"score_spread":0.2926411349816214,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2622758090","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000099517805,0.0025984936,0.0000027415524,0.040938787,0.007776547,0.00040253482,0.000066612425,0.00012694456,0.9479878],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0029407593,0.019192157,0.00011274433,0.00065840303,0.011146156,0.000049542166,0.00008978591,0.000045014058,0.9657654],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9941873,0.00044557848,0.00047878636,0.0005675281,0.0032753064,0.0010454971],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961975,0.000814743,0.0002724414,0.000953329,0.0014086686,0.00035327568],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00498199,0.00026020268,0.0004803828,0.00024814377,0.00460382,0.0005551207,0.0016426998,0.00059020886,0.0030718977],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0043876814,0.00023395079,0.00012171881,0.00021806835,0.0013264557,0.0002470138,0.00031601905,0.0009910224,0.00008858715],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005236799,0.0000075658936,0.00007799753,0.000046092086,0.000044448516,0.000035673645,0.002455993,9.678385e-8,0.0000016281715,0.0066149672,0.9814041,0.009306181],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008624051,0.000030897656,0.00017080226,0.00027758288,0.000019040537,6.908631e-7,0.009844062,0.0000015844288,0.000013232612,0.0011372522,0.9881381,0.000280515],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9972183,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9994515,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.040280383,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011336863,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012354535,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99783945},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2623963415","doi":"10.15821/slr.2015.23.1.005","title":"The Restrictions of Subrogated Underwriter’s Right under the Montreal Convention 1999","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Seoul Law Review","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Underwriting; Convention; Business; Law; Political science; Actuarial science","score_opus":0.05335164273572838,"score_gpt":0.34206240903013935,"score_spread":0.28871076629441095,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2623963415","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0026937972,0.22009674,0.00023289284,0.08307244,0.0013555059,0.0016197263,0.000014679904,0.0001574474,0.6907568],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.82444525,0.1662722,0.000019959896,0.0016088854,0.00035692562,0.000057714744,0.000019199217,0.0000148883455,0.007204962],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985698,0.00047473243,0.0002958321,0.000114942915,0.00036759343,0.00017710736],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990938,0.00017904644,0.0001693826,0.000265001,0.00020758362,0.00008519295],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015385809,0.00007494912,0.00014946607,0.000011891128,0.0007888378,0.000059296584,0.0002315745,0.00005387512,0.0000890423],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006823299,0.000040896924,0.00012469347,0.00035210326,0.00038911958,0.00011480046,0.000028138991,0.00011281131,0.00004561924],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000051267025,0.00002888867,0.000044025062,0.00004396659,0.000027806564,7.909108e-7,0.00044146858,0.000002337878,0.0000029101022,0.9765857,0.01548225,0.0073347245],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001203864,0.000026048147,0.00046502645,0.0002540997,0.00007881292,0.0000019386005,0.0004575647,0.000011057865,0.0000056895647,0.011022877,0.9875048,0.00005173978],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.028735815,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.040673114,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97202253,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000804316,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013848394,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97773194},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2626267038","doi":"","title":"The General Principles of Law: Who Needs Them?","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.03704335970269884,"score_gpt":0.2847005071333762,"score_spread":0.24765714743067735,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2626267038","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.604085,0.00011799878,0.0002550284,0.0010833947,0.00014720006,0.000067649904,0.0000021508038,0.000030068062,0.39421147],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95561534,0.00011067606,0.0001685987,0.00021315139,0.00030571365,0.0000063030525,0.0000012553796,0.0000069356106,0.043572046],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99924,0.000086541295,0.00012381663,0.00006927041,0.00026642144,0.00021397702],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995185,0.00008593292,0.00006811171,0.00013834666,0.00007628935,0.000112827765],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008329097,0.00005280772,0.00008614712,0.000020269983,0.00043856862,0.000058845828,0.00022056802,0.000108110245,0.00002035904],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009878627,0.000041617426,0.000058103964,0.00012527993,0.00067522965,0.00007377053,0.000020888776,0.000120635435,0.000009832031],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011068292,0.000008158708,0.0015715715,0.0000017927324,0.000010035333,8.448655e-7,0.03134624,0.000015675234,0.000058052676,0.9596967,0.0003265091,0.006953363],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015329984,0.000025466516,0.00167287,0.0000055036276,0.000012322577,0.0000012576354,0.006125786,0.00011186406,0.00040280365,0.030854441,0.9605646,0.00006974164],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0043614544,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020180647,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96023816,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021389115,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000113372356,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.65932435},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2626939963","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2987207","title":"Family Violence and Proving Grave Riskk for Cases under the Hague Convention Article 13(b)","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Convention; Law; History; Political science","score_opus":0.03619065261292647,"score_gpt":0.3136975977160221,"score_spread":0.27750694510309565,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2626939963","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97899455,0.0047795605,0.012296771,0.0026880815,0.00025653126,0.00026328163,0.0000014033538,0.000025350293,0.00069446664],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9956522,0.0032845817,0.000025002404,0.00012194107,0.0004018968,0.000010183154,5.885124e-7,0.0000068932254,0.0004967135],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985647,0.00012159604,0.00014333072,0.0001091412,0.00023060974,0.0008306111],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994905,0.000102649996,0.000105290885,0.00006255701,0.00014314467,0.0000958541],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028327748,0.00006551546,0.00007631208,0.00002921378,0.00077805057,0.00015486406,0.0001077741,0.000046095825,0.0000039310175],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013039843,0.000048028476,0.00005234357,0.00009038331,0.00013499377,0.00022973254,0.000015673013,0.00036338973,0.000003969485],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001512051,0.00006758128,0.007579174,0.00000559874,0.000089134985,0.0000028380641,0.0056906007,0.000058198137,0.0006708495,0.79400605,0.00026555976,0.19141322],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013627207,0.00067358295,0.006401849,0.00007606475,0.000101450954,0.00017127408,0.093081474,0.0007905422,0.00014485385,0.87013155,0.02684769,0.00021696238],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036540972,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01723257,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19119626,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00034723498,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012510046,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9616178},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2628882733","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198758457.013.16","title":"The Emergence and Development of Intellectual Property Law in Canada","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Intellectual property; Dominion; Statute; Law; Political science; Independence (probability theory); Common law; Statute of limitations; Property law; Supreme court; Property rights","score_opus":0.035722346509865145,"score_gpt":0.23073299639863884,"score_spread":0.1950106498887737,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2628882733","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0006372862,0.00007198415,0.000009688919,0.000035662877,0.0001595134,0.000216799,0.000008585175,0.000006568922,0.9988539],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0073966393,0.0005136787,0.00003512427,0.000008703828,0.000028561311,6.312047e-7,0.000002247988,0.000005041118,0.9920094],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99926996,0.000051688752,0.00011947863,0.00014706381,0.00024510545,0.0001666744],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99947464,0.000090556336,0.00014337125,0.00015716554,0.00007240316,0.00006187237],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020522969,0.00009241603,0.00014184322,0.000023540102,0.0010411362,0.000028629367,0.00040379685,0.00009093219,0.000012754552],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000021383961,0.000069629954,0.000020531836,0.0000053028693,0.00040285103,0.00004805622,0.00018434391,0.00015969631,5.7089697e-8],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019218458,0.000015364782,0.00015577921,0.00011092057,0.00014582917,0.00004483923,0.06544177,0.0000021428768,0.0000051021398,0.51628375,0.020221908,0.3973804],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009061279,0.000008624948,0.000049071266,0.000062217485,0.000009440455,1.5097258e-7,0.0013047915,0.0000063946663,0.000014301952,0.000035515564,0.9983206,0.000098285],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.85256284,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9948035,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9780987,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00045655176,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0048758085,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8649475},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2666126237","doi":"","title":"Layered Rights: Robertson v. Thomson","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Law and economics; Chemistry; Political science; Economics","score_opus":0.017198936154274657,"score_gpt":0.2916194686784881,"score_spread":0.27442053252421345,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2666126237","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23033732,0.0004637452,0.00096795405,0.0019867667,0.001277007,0.0003052868,0.0000057090324,0.00035321395,0.76430297],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9805355,0.000056030753,0.0005395054,0.0007606853,0.0014514067,0.000007623624,0.0000067082256,0.000015345968,0.016627168],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982451,0.00010845156,0.00027442377,0.00029360963,0.000519009,0.00055935973],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999032,0.00012224381,0.00009515791,0.00027097212,0.00010733335,0.00037229675],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013799203,0.00014043604,0.00017454126,0.000062291816,0.0010410409,0.00017234978,0.00026961893,0.00019403965,0.0024593512],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007925882,0.00013225418,0.00011337727,0.00029996064,0.00019795845,0.000422039,0.00003852976,0.00023726522,0.00047050085],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006962792,0.00012277177,0.0040219785,0.000008241231,0.00003008971,0.00003919064,0.0041142143,0.0000064766746,0.0009573782,0.9687932,0.009617824,0.012219013],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031465798,0.00004158852,0.004362402,0.00002290212,0.0000118945645,0.0000016156062,0.00047132137,0.000006910741,0.0010350603,0.005579892,0.9879595,0.00019222125],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.053863242,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14995351,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9783417,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016827876,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006999936,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99845254},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2726606836","doi":"10.1007/978-3-319-56574-3_30","title":"Commonwealth Africa: Foreign Law in Commonwealth African Courts","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Ius comparatum","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Thompson Rivers University","funders":"","keywords":"Commonwealth; Law; Political science; Context (archaeology); Comparative law; International law; Geography","score_opus":0.08071544789419803,"score_gpt":0.333722654878665,"score_spread":0.25300720698446694,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2726606836","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00018285179,0.0015307964,0.000014157049,0.002021744,0.0011537585,0.00078978617,0.00009816586,0.00016605592,0.9940427],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6145612,0.0005344012,0.000055667493,0.00026346196,0.00063390925,0.000025304676,0.000057215715,0.000057392812,0.38381144],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99675196,0.00016672368,0.00068405434,0.00059829134,0.00089035626,0.00090859213],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99737746,0.00021593973,0.00079569325,0.0009852006,0.00017623957,0.00044947088],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012552919,0.00047940193,0.0010471182,0.00023454249,0.0016376149,0.00035562014,0.0010702742,0.00061107014,0.0004674612],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000024395013,0.000517599,0.0002476115,0.000046196157,0.0010472266,0.00024365194,0.00017841694,0.0011050398,0.0002960196],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000044864442,0.00005882684,0.00017402001,0.00002572104,0.00003105652,0.00006261425,0.004718574,0.0000035115343,5.002568e-7,0.9516906,0.04178582,0.001403882],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004009347,0.00009965929,0.0004911961,0.00023801262,0.000035115125,0.0000031003794,0.00027731506,0.00004157496,7.365682e-7,0.10512662,0.89281946,0.00046626283],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018126462,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11627997,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8510336,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005555151,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006354987,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99972755},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2727239441","doi":"10.1093/law/9780199666409.001.0001","title":"Human Rights and Private International Law","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Law; Political science; Conflict of laws; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.019888380856064317,"score_gpt":0.25051333534988623,"score_spread":0.23062495449382192,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2727239441","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00034681772,0.000010901785,0.000029951385,0.00009205813,0.00032612224,0.00017980275,0.000056141776,0.000092978975,0.99886525],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0020182617,0.000049232305,0.000026553364,0.00003223953,0.00045042747,3.7904377e-7,0.000013638138,0.000009296933,0.9974],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99915874,0.000050475857,0.000089210174,0.00024861656,0.00027984087,0.000173139],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999507,0.000029856716,0.00012509685,0.00014539239,0.00007767422,0.00011496617],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00011733417,0.00013108649,0.00014630145,0.00007355627,0.0009264932,0.00007759975,0.00035148725,0.00025992183,0.000099775294],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000016539132,0.00012956133,0.00007259135,0.0000043805194,0.00051488105,0.00014971363,0.00019518749,0.0001526043,0.0000010500054],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012290382,0.000004703741,0.0000039470215,0.0000059756594,0.000052128,0.000019584773,0.00081880897,2.061727e-8,0.0000061303813,0.9928302,0.004662496,0.0015836706],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030952913,0.000017810484,0.000015391352,0.00007893018,0.0000412125,6.0639735e-7,0.000014930802,4.900228e-7,0.000010052745,0.013777268,0.9855656,0.00016820467],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013263015,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021446403,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9809031,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023705211,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000620911,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7125931},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2731669318","doi":"","title":"A Review of Canadian Radiocommunications Law Around \"Jammers\"","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Canadian journal of law and technology","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Business; Political science","score_opus":0.06626764288385133,"score_gpt":0.3556558498855568,"score_spread":0.2893882070017055,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2731669318","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[8.463097e-7,0.8870657,8.00487e-7,0.0114961015,0.0001840873,0.00026721274,0.000051638624,0.000007355704,0.10092626],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00029373466,0.9981892,0.0001496331,0.0009440541,0.00021549613,0.000008722023,0.000009337299,0.000016848438,0.00017294224],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99843174,0.00017519518,0.00074738153,0.000130568,0.000118841635,0.00039628104],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977987,0.000086857064,0.0006459567,0.00036336563,0.0003303439,0.0007747892],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00083612226,0.00017583185,0.0010846341,0.0014534771,0.0006207144,0.00004314787,0.0007407102,0.00053677923,0.00017601883],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013382992,0.00016516537,0.00023412042,0.0010767527,0.0013709088,0.00012337902,0.000017819557,0.0006550049,0.00000644684],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[1.120533e-7,0.0000031033385,0.0000015964937,0.0013195437,0.00005740338,0.000016896729,0.000105339386,5.688571e-9,1.3951365e-8,0.59297293,0.0014118688,0.4041112],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000058694248,0.000037554655,2.0423829e-7,0.023417767,0.0003622833,0.00022150435,0.00010668107,3.914986e-8,6.779514e-8,0.0008335493,0.9748266,0.00013508531],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.74136597,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9911045,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9734147,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004491152,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007328887,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99829865},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2734332218","doi":"","title":"La cyberintimidation : Analyse juridique","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Business","score_opus":0.012614384422242532,"score_gpt":0.2889151570106097,"score_spread":0.27630077258836716,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2734332218","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6335865,0.000019317353,0.00013899234,0.0019658024,0.00058332505,0.000120554396,0.0000034702061,0.000154425,0.3634276],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9945294,0.00004950009,0.0006219739,0.00036459864,0.00077490945,0.000017463828,0.000008891346,0.000011882366,0.0036213705],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989052,0.00015763137,0.00018098106,0.0002185388,0.0002929801,0.0002446575],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992492,0.000088178145,0.000076700075,0.0002575097,0.00010373322,0.00022463013],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00095158187,0.00009570827,0.00011781687,0.00005341719,0.00050668995,0.00021638146,0.00021182044,0.00019570741,0.0023289146],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018035373,0.00009785822,0.00008831016,0.00018663012,0.00022387342,0.0004075565,0.000034846264,0.00039621897,0.00042630476],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017798784,0.000099019104,0.009566227,0.0000072480293,0.0000310258,0.000011464247,0.003818895,0.000008478424,0.012499125,0.9499606,0.0028311247,0.021149015],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016151273,0.000013243941,0.012042192,0.0000069404496,0.000016319074,0.0000017542772,0.00028396008,0.000013628275,0.0012587238,0.0021305226,0.9839342,0.00013699183],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015679393,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.099733576,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98110306,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000044227727,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020843171,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985831},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2737184433","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v34i1.5009","title":"A THIRD REVOLUTION IN FAMILY DISPUTE RESOLUTION: ACCESSIBLE LEGAL PROFESSIONALISM","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Family law; Scholarship; Economic Justice; Law; Dispute resolution; Political science; Doctrine; Alternative dispute resolution; Practice of law; Sociology; Legal practice; Service (business); Legal profession; Business","score_opus":0.09713719114710222,"score_gpt":0.4104399470507432,"score_spread":0.313302755903641,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2737184433","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.59883845,0.00041493517,0.00052087574,0.014113432,0.0020410714,0.00089788553,0.000019752313,0.000092284085,0.38306135],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9916076,0.00013330801,0.0004136572,0.00040772025,0.0007372873,0.00004462279,0.0000034267364,0.000014000288,0.0066383923],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99815786,0.00013995018,0.00036802646,0.00032560815,0.00062714354,0.00038141303],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987435,0.00008575219,0.00032296826,0.00050131103,0.00021264896,0.00013387082],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010258135,0.00012923205,0.0002394744,0.00018962771,0.0010169388,0.00040927835,0.0011532203,0.00016710759,0.00010125131],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005829057,0.00013019513,0.0000713517,0.00024778792,0.00025038968,0.0019665945,0.000377557,0.00022551451,0.000044754423],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0026643707,0.0017387313,0.19894674,0.0013534813,0.00018297715,0.00019947697,0.04907245,0.0010825972,0.012259089,0.5435824,0.11005931,0.078858405],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005309018,0.00004830066,0.7197284,0.00043746686,0.00006201098,6.180001e-7,0.0009079624,0.00020728454,0.00013730566,0.00080516876,0.27691463,0.000219936],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014961568,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003947763,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5427772,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014020082,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000378287,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9915979},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2738143575","doi":"10.29173/alr784","title":"Organized Pseudolegal Commercial Arguments in Canadian Inter-Partner Family Law Court Disputes","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Meaning (existential); Government (linguistics); Family law; Conflict of laws; Spouse; Phenomenon; Character (mathematics); Sociology; Political science; Epistemology; Philosophy; Mathematics","score_opus":0.03193519093153488,"score_gpt":0.3449691696536009,"score_spread":0.31303397872206606,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2738143575","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.022694448,0.0049790535,0.0000017257827,0.050701063,0.0010462486,0.00082731125,0.000011230211,0.000025161013,0.91971374],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9758789,0.009359974,0.000017619292,0.011097724,0.0002652015,0.00003232011,0.000017372184,0.000018089777,0.0033127754],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984262,0.00018979737,0.00034082666,0.0002631595,0.00025195067,0.0005280552],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99879605,0.00009829684,0.00015972566,0.00049355195,0.000078570716,0.00037379214],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00080102606,0.0001599902,0.0003996317,0.000028367685,0.0012543591,0.00029151907,0.0006380195,0.00010551596,0.00088127045],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00025294744,0.0001482475,0.000105103856,0.00010206357,0.00037256442,0.0004777369,0.000080252445,0.00018428509,0.00039120243],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000059048775,0.00006817412,0.021318147,0.00015180794,0.000035490728,0.000015722191,0.0015781666,3.5968984e-8,0.000010241398,0.94666547,0.016588576,0.013562256],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027913266,0.00001563679,0.011766298,0.0010607484,0.000040399016,9.914589e-7,0.00002393644,0.000002800207,0.000004058936,0.0002157626,0.9864102,0.00018003046],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9884441,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9980812,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96982163,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020263813,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00027015535,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96492934},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2745647843","doi":"10.1163/18754112-02003004","title":"The Development of Singapore’s Military Justice System","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International Peacekeeping","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Military justice; Law; Economic Justice; Political science; Human rights; Independence (probability theory); International law; International court; Public administration; Public international law","score_opus":0.025110063677621208,"score_gpt":0.3142576477662071,"score_spread":0.28914758408858593,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2745647843","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8802333,0.0019494429,0.023988634,0.019102445,0.008347239,0.0001395024,0.00000445362,0.000030267396,0.066204734],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99678034,0.0003120439,0.0014334483,0.00002479656,0.0007637121,7.7163975e-7,1.5741334e-7,0.0000037407278,0.0006810209],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986329,0.00007480481,0.0005250797,0.00005227577,0.00060594175,0.0001089963],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99855936,0.00033548046,0.00040165838,0.00005068999,0.0005993039,0.000053508236],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019919127,0.000044652905,0.00009218034,0.00007416763,0.00035463323,0.00002101979,0.00030772077,0.000030277808,0.000024921148],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004412114,0.000025860103,0.00008229475,0.000057917154,0.00009572317,0.00022257154,0.00003052379,0.00006635294,0.00000534741],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00044822096,0.00016510581,0.0071034166,0.00011465403,0.00070116867,0.000031461957,0.053170104,0.00008756551,0.023329373,0.16256246,0.004356967,0.7479295],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00069921446,0.00006126435,0.022843353,0.001230089,0.00007601861,0.000034907804,0.024181142,0.00010778784,0.0017644647,0.00035248048,0.9485127,0.00013661633],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005171265,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00021796788,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9441557,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00029450931,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026485667,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27275878},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2746004208","doi":"","title":"Domestic Implementation of International Treaties: The Next New Challenge for Private International Law?","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the Annual Meeting-American Society of International Law","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; International law; Private law; Commercial law; Political science; Conflict of laws; Municipal law; Comparative law; Public law; Sociology","score_opus":0.02513259140451764,"score_gpt":0.33399813620009283,"score_spread":0.3088655447955752,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2746004208","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.55602616,0.00018322149,0.00079748855,0.23321684,0.0029748522,0.0016048488,0.00091847795,0.0001161564,0.20416197],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9936211,0.000657518,0.0022417896,0.0005529104,0.0007957627,0.00004176002,0.000008517774,0.000018099872,0.0020625547],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979195,0.000020834874,0.00059649005,0.00024971183,0.0009922216,0.00022121417],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99671984,0.0003801341,0.0012439304,0.0000999081,0.0014944595,0.00006170498],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007976115,0.00015424122,0.00023950297,0.00004578847,0.00025132258,0.00006541553,0.00126474,0.000060460534,0.00013934907],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00025131635,0.00009782688,0.00040462322,0.00017362209,0.001279216,0.0006652259,0.00022530674,0.00008645296,0.000001397639],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014608324,0.00013358177,0.0080434345,0.00003151682,0.0005340261,3.9409166e-8,0.030878333,0.000004359654,0.010027606,0.9241588,0.006016067,0.020026159],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0021184073,0.00042152966,0.0072632097,0.00045746163,0.00012379601,0.0000030626757,0.09177915,0.000098083234,0.013569925,0.02095255,0.86288726,0.00032554872],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0064655617,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00042877687,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9032062,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018622914,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011118458,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9774038},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2747492913","doi":"","title":"A Whole New Meaning to Having Our Head in the Clouds: Voice Recognition Technology, the Transmission of our Oral Communications to the Cloud and the Ability of Canadian Law to Protect Us from the Dangers it Presents","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Meaning (existential); Cloud computing; Head (geology); Transmission (telecommunications); Computer science; Communication; Telecommunications; Law; Psychology; Political science; Geology","score_opus":0.06512706790163116,"score_gpt":0.3402128090900553,"score_spread":0.27508574118842416,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2747492913","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4472547,0.00015205794,0.000055787772,0.54272866,0.00013737446,0.0021979054,0.0000616823,0.000016661283,0.0073952037],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965434,0.00004393895,0.00038231435,0.0025908586,0.00017733523,0.00015316004,0.0000034191949,0.000008491355,0.00009706651],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979914,0.0008934322,0.00029022928,0.00021486051,0.00033537616,0.00027474322],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979137,0.00030354827,0.00015860674,0.0013464236,0.00012643392,0.00015128226],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034303481,0.000113852475,0.00018217212,0.00004955398,0.002792639,0.0002677808,0.0020214838,0.000107898864,0.000008628126],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009139004,0.000055037828,0.000068973466,0.00046248277,0.00038406346,0.00016346236,0.00021183722,0.00044607386,0.0000125596425],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00087792973,0.0002996945,0.027089315,0.000046061465,0.00023475438,0.0000037087689,0.60574967,0.00026460254,0.006779492,0.12539546,0.019635327,0.21362399],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00063372037,0.000087967754,0.046466146,0.0003089615,0.00006489238,0.0000010373092,0.06256805,0.00007073117,0.00030867886,0.009436546,0.8799083,0.00014492944],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.92540735,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97917515,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.860273,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000076553806,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018719024,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985056},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2752149979","doi":"","title":"Canada Law Book Company","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biographies | United Kingdom Encyclopedia of Law","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Business; Political science","score_opus":0.02212696804910387,"score_gpt":0.2649659791132603,"score_spread":0.24283901106415645,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2752149979","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.092835106,0.00067473034,0.00004960889,0.0072211362,0.0014895357,0.00037861784,0.00018088246,0.00020801899,0.89696234],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.991001,0.0034398518,0.00008797232,0.0018748799,0.0003830852,0.000013042584,0.000017024433,0.000021047623,0.0031620646],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99814224,0.0001569276,0.0003802284,0.00025374076,0.000608792,0.0004580737],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99870914,0.0003242778,0.00020094452,0.00029542547,0.00024867197,0.00022153104],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00026560802,0.00018119458,0.00025624986,0.00035280772,0.0006001323,0.000035589816,0.00036525814,0.0001346288,0.00033779046],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005121089,0.00013920465,0.0001374416,0.0011660301,0.0014378713,0.00029640383,0.000055240154,0.000093971394,0.0000062029108],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002621563,0.000044487104,0.00422791,0.00001051816,0.000050224626,0.000006793678,0.000585579,4.059796e-7,0.00020754023,0.96213603,0.031541515,0.0011627983],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039629702,0.000045003933,0.001953407,0.00007663635,0.00003342798,7.2761134e-7,0.00019166505,5.2454146e-7,0.0001721942,0.0011308272,0.99577814,0.00022116148],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9659169,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9598301,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9642366,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007563375,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00030158373,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.56766015},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2754018347","doi":"","title":"Theories of law and the constitutional law of the British Empire : an address read by invitation before the Canadian Bar Association, [...]","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books  | UK Encyclopedia of Law","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Association (psychology); Bar (unit); Empire; Constitutional law; Political science; Philosophy; Geography; Epistemology","score_opus":0.009587300853810907,"score_gpt":0.2527566127517983,"score_spread":0.24316931189798738,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2754018347","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07649484,0.00024126245,0.000006583101,0.010951087,0.00030851623,0.00047236565,0.0005091996,0.000013865666,0.9110023],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9956124,0.00016050339,0.000010148806,0.0008969928,0.00013423486,0.000019104351,0.000010611528,0.0000055646988,0.00315047],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985074,0.0003491008,0.00031592793,0.00013817645,0.0004952767,0.00019415],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99867094,0.00041450505,0.00031704683,0.00020292327,0.0003152242,0.00007937135],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012427908,0.00008628129,0.00017971874,0.000012248411,0.0015644388,0.00008534573,0.00029529215,0.00012359496,0.00008282989],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023971203,0.00004824701,0.000073176,0.00006840968,0.004926135,0.00022739072,0.000037436897,0.00008734777,7.297605e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011171582,0.000010764722,0.00999293,0.000005750234,0.000027480373,2.1763212e-7,0.007076997,2.8634648e-7,0.00001354815,0.9805985,0.000903533,0.0013588065],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00069953874,0.000044650023,0.019302819,0.00011211665,0.00007309678,0.0000017928734,0.0010188527,0.0000010606125,0.000121090045,0.16206327,0.81645566,0.00010607449],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.72691905,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9682017,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9191175,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001025626,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00033167793,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997354},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2755268770","doi":"","title":"The Upper Canada law list","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books  | UK Encyclopedia of Law","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.011072686608371947,"score_gpt":0.25198706522070485,"score_spread":0.24091437861233292,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2755268770","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020857846,0.00017238017,0.0000063327852,0.0069352775,0.00078083255,0.00014247624,0.000019188024,0.000030330595,0.9710553],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9303159,0.00066668045,0.000018989394,0.0005431777,0.00044510153,0.00001187452,9.687699e-7,0.000009284789,0.06798803],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988004,0.000078435885,0.00022328133,0.00014847837,0.000444288,0.00030509144],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990957,0.00036093424,0.00009585912,0.00023723012,0.000089435875,0.000120837845],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00036795923,0.0000897886,0.000120547695,0.00000967612,0.0007756674,0.000037374248,0.0002873467,0.000060006332,0.00028809623],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006273123,0.000052779036,0.000060590093,0.000045091525,0.0005069931,0.00009600333,0.000043347038,0.000058374346,0.000008859193],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000826274,0.000006029799,0.001868794,0.000002028548,0.000010240135,0.0000023350929,0.0006389243,3.9176328e-8,0.0000312924,0.9768159,0.009124443,0.011491759],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013087009,0.000015893083,0.0016492152,0.000019030596,0.000009571454,4.1133808e-7,0.00015984509,1.8705273e-7,0.000109106986,0.0053442013,0.9924687,0.00009292687],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.94107795,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9903724,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9833443,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011883684,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00039246673,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5965885},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2760976352","doi":"","title":"Manitoba. Law Reform Commission","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biographies | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Commission; Law reform; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Economics","score_opus":0.02506875251680596,"score_gpt":0.27766213789328437,"score_spread":0.2525933853764784,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2760976352","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04517808,0.00023980816,8.779938e-7,0.0056388318,0.0009365389,0.00019127673,0.000054963268,0.00004278653,0.94771683],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9875816,0.007336251,0.00016202865,0.00019074441,0.0005451846,0.000011248681,0.000010739591,0.000015446085,0.00414676],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99875236,0.00004847104,0.00023398783,0.00019437658,0.00033252066,0.00043828652],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99852616,0.000023851184,0.00019554705,0.0005555458,0.00013279417,0.0005661299],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00039211806,0.00012853804,0.00018933947,0.0007078557,0.0024857346,0.00016119854,0.0006454877,0.00017986454,0.000206393],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006129053,0.00012512387,0.00014866983,0.00045173618,0.0011706967,0.00040365383,0.00004406565,0.00011180536,0.000020273656],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018858165,0.000035914873,0.049564656,0.000021345626,0.000044010874,0.000021835862,0.0037391626,1.13524415e-7,0.000033810913,0.8913814,0.021612776,0.033526152],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014187931,0.000034779852,0.07675714,0.000030693278,0.000017517812,5.8185714e-7,0.0017421304,4.686072e-7,0.000023949133,0.0014805918,0.9196211,0.00014918296],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98440677,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9982903,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9435701,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011932343,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00025852487,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988129},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2761172895","doi":"10.3917/neg.028.0223","title":"À propos de l’ouvrage de Robert A. Baruch Bush et Joseph P. Folger, The Promise of Mediation. The Transformative Approach to Conflict , Éd. révisée, San Francisco, Jossey-Bass Publishers, 2005, 287 p.","year":2017,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Négociations","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"HEC Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Bass (fish); Humanities; Art; Philosophy; Geology","score_opus":0.026519645828153294,"score_gpt":0.3106052506210481,"score_spread":0.2840856047928948,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2761172895","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.026817044,0.0062929965,0.04774858,0.4539871,0.0033665898,0.0072243023,0.00092347,0.0001894548,0.45345047],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9756504,0.0014097561,0.0012325838,0.002343373,0.0011765093,0.0006792103,0.00006209373,0.00005130657,0.017394742],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99607545,0.00087424257,0.0007338693,0.0003952006,0.0010122801,0.0009089736],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996653,0.0007854493,0.0007790876,0.0008425863,0.0005846779,0.0003551799],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005062209,0.00032421108,0.00041666298,0.00011305562,0.0042202948,0.0012804214,0.0014495595,0.00039512408,0.0006495866],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020035321,0.00023765521,0.000294384,0.0005802427,0.0009493776,0.002010047,0.000102489284,0.00070479885,0.000054847776],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006649058,0.0012462238,0.007843597,0.00013938955,0.0005220385,0.0000022617567,0.5253023,0.0019355048,0.0003800187,0.16963731,0.26635322,0.026571644],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011009055,0.00013683295,0.12115361,0.000109035886,0.00034100574,0.0000053557874,0.013843233,0.0066305674,0.0003715496,0.0024894022,0.85336894,0.0004495677],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011142675,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0116074765,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9488334,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00051662297,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015498125,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99975634},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2762226998","doi":"","title":"University of Alberta. Institute of Law Research and Reform","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biographies | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law; Public administration; Law reform","score_opus":0.04676969797403268,"score_gpt":0.3042039743835327,"score_spread":0.2574342764095,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2762226998","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.34255308,0.00013201319,2.4920317e-7,0.0016283296,0.00015503548,0.00010565889,0.000030969044,0.0000031830514,0.65539145],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98552877,0.010871682,0.00009671678,0.000009147941,0.000057702924,4.8376893e-7,0.0000030406952,0.0000040362806,0.003428415],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991686,0.000040504245,0.00014123907,0.00013385536,0.00026808094,0.00024771935],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989827,0.00004271067,0.00014505279,0.0003120783,0.00026202266,0.00025539298],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00051010854,0.000059841048,0.00016798767,0.00077134697,0.0009458591,0.00002126623,0.00038396855,0.000115289484,0.000056103956],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006692002,0.00006470866,0.00006198335,0.00051253266,0.004315555,0.0003233184,0.00005423573,0.000081726765,0.0000011085982],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002864765,0.000025818857,0.055194434,0.000039999555,0.000038292346,0.0000051817947,0.00891468,8.622374e-8,0.00004534532,0.92943144,0.0014126016,0.0048634754],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001498093,0.00006857846,0.08381641,0.000035407276,0.00001126401,1.9934564e-7,0.0018699738,3.0614447e-7,0.000032500026,0.0014621406,0.91249233,0.000061055944],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9940773,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99855566,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9279693,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000041194253,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00034533994,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99839413},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2762411864","doi":"","title":"Canada case citator = Table de la jurisprudence citee du Canada.","year":2016,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Books | European Encyclopedia of Law","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Table (database); Political science; Humanities; Law; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.0064119489842306135,"score_gpt":0.23378951212356072,"score_spread":0.2273775631393301,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2762411864","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19251357,0.00030102296,0.00002921554,0.0014143293,0.00084765925,0.00020897485,0.00036764255,0.000043250813,0.8042743],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96422744,0.0025253005,0.00007321622,0.0007207527,0.0010572718,0.0000056295476,0.000003187228,0.000060190123,0.031326994],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963597,0.001022381,0.00060865545,0.00046832606,0.0008099829,0.0007309207],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99753845,0.0008972348,0.00037201116,0.0004536557,0.0002079109,0.0005307248],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013203596,0.0003214582,0.00037175874,0.000047551915,0.0006395065,0.00010917247,0.00056827726,0.00009699518,0.00029130167],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003452955,0.00027223292,0.000086140775,0.00018184322,0.00061862654,0.0002554036,0.00017201429,0.00020399802,0.0000151925005],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001171419,0.00022539424,0.032356918,0.0002377889,0.00023190737,0.024509592,0.00537089,0.000012157031,0.00067516003,0.6112595,0.28291038,0.042093154],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004813888,0.000055910707,0.007330489,0.00017957824,0.000072189614,0.00019059045,0.00025122205,0.0000033475942,0.00009164919,0.00011571924,0.9908424,0.00038553288],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99873495,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9984041,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7729473,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00072126597,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0069201584,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999973},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2763647815","doi":"","title":"University of British Columbia. Faculty of Law","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biography | US Enciclopedia of law","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.018625780709912783,"score_gpt":0.24871574592866916,"score_spread":0.23008996521875638,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2763647815","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8076712,0.00014120391,0.000027274595,0.00011625675,0.0001693403,0.00014720697,0.0005549687,0.000034417048,0.19113816],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99752194,0.00086079224,0.000256271,0.000025039677,0.000059894293,5.4429546e-7,0.000005167483,0.0000053212234,0.0012650226],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989316,0.00008101471,0.00022566601,0.00017884611,0.0003712137,0.00021168908],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99911827,0.000076056655,0.0002323345,0.00017129624,0.00029379124,0.000108268556],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000361552,0.000058538648,0.00022536523,0.00004838358,0.0001665453,0.000014990282,0.00025400828,0.000120683115,0.00033940413],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000017813425,0.00007604167,0.00024702633,0.00036740693,0.001506067,0.00019561057,0.000044957767,0.00003722387,0.0000026091052],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010984683,0.0006920598,0.62104195,0.00014149705,0.000298527,0.000023364846,0.009163182,4.658946e-7,0.0074636554,0.3011732,0.016740719,0.043151505],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005690984,0.00012965557,0.119697146,0.00010032569,0.00005044916,6.2277303e-7,0.0005479678,1.8614425e-7,0.00040134988,0.0010881146,0.8772826,0.0001324883],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.585557,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.51725054,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8605419,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000018118759,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007688583,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5549166},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2763850975","doi":"","title":"Canada. Privy Council","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biographies | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.021366187253584818,"score_gpt":0.21595695186401404,"score_spread":0.1945907646104292,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2763850975","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05620489,0.0006584954,0.0000057273583,0.021664467,0.0012151167,0.0002580362,0.00032186095,0.00004805782,0.9196234],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96149325,0.015691295,0.000101865546,0.00070919935,0.0005580803,0.000020265585,0.0000048634197,0.000020464375,0.021400733],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982025,0.00006354201,0.00025153425,0.00020730376,0.0007498013,0.00052533404],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985775,0.00010583492,0.00009999126,0.00023726738,0.0003646835,0.0006147498],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00045605388,0.00012501494,0.00017574937,0.00057687046,0.0003640247,0.000022175318,0.00029927204,0.00011507158,0.0005791179],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022705115,0.0001008225,0.00009024277,0.0015360506,0.00050467893,0.00016148695,0.000014191873,0.000052749554,0.000009685148],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001794832,0.000022267683,0.083211675,0.000014886243,0.000071600196,0.00002773666,0.0026135927,2.033399e-7,0.00011457592,0.16592783,0.6968975,0.051080145],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016037218,0.000020609052,0.03084482,0.000024346737,0.000013976099,5.3139786e-7,0.00031850068,9.0035044e-8,0.000018158424,0.00034813982,0.96809137,0.00015908903],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9995282,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999915,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90528834,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000551176,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011836576,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9937654},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2766450298","doi":"","title":"Proceedings of the ... annual meeting of the Canadian Bar Association.","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Association (psychology); Bar (unit); Political science; Geography; Psychology; Meteorology","score_opus":0.008383829629134398,"score_gpt":0.21585425077542483,"score_spread":0.20747042114629044,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2766450298","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2223699,0.000037037044,7.248895e-8,0.010077045,0.00038052275,0.00026987292,0.00019014417,0.0000069906987,0.76666844],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9661753,0.00009168855,0.000020545995,0.00019659313,0.00020999934,0.00000764075,3.8641315e-7,0.000010634057,0.033287205],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99852574,0.00005655319,0.00033151047,0.00013724195,0.00054423243,0.00040472712],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985162,0.000116254334,0.00038677873,0.00014784715,0.0005210883,0.00031180773],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008664511,0.00009265383,0.00017685875,0.00018048663,0.0005221692,0.000018801036,0.00050945807,0.000160763,0.00013509815],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00079258985,0.000057462654,0.00012771082,0.0004112942,0.00026778402,0.00016358284,0.0000301216,0.000097047734,0.0000029399466],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004539058,0.000011663778,0.6810018,0.000024173276,0.000053400076,4.9328617e-7,0.016492266,9.232841e-7,0.00024129414,0.25371304,0.04160014,0.0068562683],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010385698,0.000010605651,0.20191593,0.00008155267,0.000022986298,2.0474529e-7,0.0008335543,2.5800233e-7,0.00019459473,0.0005938324,0.7961707,0.000071939874],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9847675,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9989483,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.75457054,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007109049,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030231245,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.53628933},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2768530020","doi":"10.5539/jpl.v10n5p56","title":"Influence of the Decisions of the European Court of Human Rights on the Legal Order of Bosnia and Herzegovina in Terms of Exercising Same Sex Unions","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Politics and Law","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Convention; Publicity; Political science; Law; Context (archaeology); Fundamental rights; Order (exchange); International human rights law; Law and economics; Sociology; Business; Geography","score_opus":0.02360879527302272,"score_gpt":0.3155810714569732,"score_spread":0.29197227618395044,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2768530020","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9759343,0.000026432992,0.0000031312022,0.0013767205,0.000055931974,0.00006684768,0.000014021388,4.5360719e-7,0.022522127],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99972165,0.00005530324,0.000016423312,0.0000392688,0.00004956296,9.559759e-8,4.234948e-8,0.000003275486,0.0001143532],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99892056,0.00020380119,0.0004197731,0.00004780641,0.00031087446,0.00009719436],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985401,0.000215892,0.00077864586,0.00023088782,0.00019407093,0.000040390634],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010461324,0.000054052587,0.00019723069,0.00003716305,0.00048323552,0.000026529573,0.00035022348,0.00003374168,0.000004646374],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018982735,0.000026533698,0.00006847636,0.00006618303,0.0011844824,0.00010386652,0.00008692967,0.00013941231,2.438786e-8],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000147641795,0.00013343185,0.031405706,0.000018806924,0.000029515966,0.0000016319583,0.009500255,0.00006920145,0.005886644,0.9524352,0.000056403525,0.00044842757],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005269482,0.00021142377,0.9401647,0.0009766434,0.00006743183,0.0000061914293,0.001276162,0.000018958952,0.005233905,0.041377284,0.0100749815,0.00006539754],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009803186,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004144385,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91105795,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000012740143,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005878575,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99679065},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2768561102","doi":"10.5539/jpl.v10n5p116","title":"Brexit, Arbitration and Private International Law","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Politics and Law","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Brexit; European union; Conflict of laws; Law; Jurisdiction; Political science; International law; Scots law; Arbitration; European Union law; Common law; Enforcement; International trade; Sources of law; Economics","score_opus":0.025194250365299244,"score_gpt":0.3303375270903412,"score_spread":0.30514327672504193,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2768561102","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6203124,0.00010901292,0.00010850075,0.015025433,0.000722084,0.00003771962,0.0000045876577,0.0000044057065,0.3636759],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997995,0.00025696505,0.0001921476,0.00054873707,0.0006595144,1.4485087e-7,2.6214474e-7,0.0000021881904,0.0003450398],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995822,0.000014280346,0.00012518253,0.000038588525,0.00015791529,0.000081851525],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995714,0.00001777678,0.00017873375,0.000046783392,0.00009348602,0.00009183133],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00029170958,0.00003216239,0.000063769956,0.000016939419,0.00062249677,0.00033986976,0.000088128196,0.00003513877,0.00001774631],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000037963215,0.000028031547,0.000023418668,0.000005444576,0.0003079413,0.00034856296,0.000021827158,0.000071295406,4.8928746e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000034860652,0.000009971276,0.0010798059,0.0000021981693,0.000010817404,0.000003961213,0.0010505466,2.1722396e-7,0.00008996351,0.99726397,0.000020104002,0.0004649696],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004419651,0.000067403125,0.019063666,0.000042935677,0.00001901559,0.000023478875,0.00025057213,0.000018294653,0.00017287265,0.21630783,0.7635335,0.000058468606],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025790487,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013421143,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.78095615,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000025237163,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000039832204,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47878048},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2769365249","doi":"10.14453/ltc.735","title":"Law as Minor Jurisprudence: Is it a Mistake?","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law/text/culture","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Mistake; Minor (academic); Jurisprudence; Law; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.033291896444684915,"score_gpt":0.3570352434425964,"score_spread":0.3237433469979115,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2769365249","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.023822382,0.0005823771,0.000011435956,0.021611964,0.0009001474,0.00031439963,0.00004030814,0.00012476029,0.95259225],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8046272,0.00031914812,0.0001569229,0.00578912,0.0012751416,0.000022565797,0.0000079371885,0.00001742453,0.18778454],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980007,0.00008147678,0.00024268636,0.00045411338,0.00070048566,0.00052055414],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99854517,0.000029637691,0.00023647599,0.0006838358,0.00021768044,0.0002871769],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00038097712,0.00022626777,0.0002589146,0.00001844668,0.0037177755,0.0009852235,0.0008660884,0.0003693065,0.002484038],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000100953046,0.00019041466,0.00020703263,0.00009633234,0.00079910253,0.0006718312,0.00010163846,0.00030888218,0.0009516553],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036261772,0.000097536205,0.0004693735,0.000024190906,0.000051204494,0.00004605596,0.06987218,2.8780514e-7,0.00086948083,0.7717193,0.15172653,0.005087617],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035967107,0.00007345913,0.0011520528,0.00005863028,0.000042031592,0.0000051688953,0.0027559497,0.0000034824766,0.0006420587,0.0053323507,0.9892895,0.00028562415],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.025784919,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.032159057,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.837563,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000856781,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011130421,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998262},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2769685875","doi":"","title":"The ongoing relationship of the common laws of England and Canada","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Bristol Research (University of Bristol)","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.04625337912484769,"score_gpt":0.3136928207869095,"score_spread":0.26743944166206185,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2769685875","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97253644,0.00030460022,0.000053346113,0.0029683614,0.00006279661,0.0001749185,0.000011977609,0.000004427803,0.023883097],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9973384,0.0001388725,0.000031925094,0.000004919782,0.000021747517,6.855498e-8,8.4821744e-7,0.0000027418766,0.0024604383],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984041,0.00036627622,0.00013265677,0.00009877894,0.0007841427,0.00021404342],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99788284,0.0013208718,0.00015471799,0.00020511376,0.0003530267,0.00008342734],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003449201,0.000039709605,0.00011610224,0.000067867346,0.0015596156,0.000011944006,0.0003979989,0.000057102152,0.000012743654],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00046378892,0.00003538586,0.000043511965,0.00039279542,0.001364226,0.00008678314,0.0001363084,0.00022462588,3.8173587e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003336027,0.000093089526,0.81807965,0.000100089615,0.000060456863,0.000019721841,0.038994774,0.000010190643,0.0005238762,0.06609406,0.011295027,0.06439548],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002855607,0.000037856258,0.600756,0.000040051335,0.000010732755,0.0000010670743,0.02268283,0.000036070833,0.00008110756,0.0005941524,0.37542826,0.00004636144],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9263528,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98988825,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3641332,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001864365,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006746295,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99974024},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2769961377","doi":"","title":"“LOVE WILL TEAR US APART” SOME THOUGHTS ON INTRAFAMILIAL TORTS AND FAMILY LAW MODERNIZATION BETWEEN ITALY AND CANADA","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Iris (Roma Tre University)","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tort; Law; Family law; Comparative law; Common law; Civil law (Civil law); Political science; Municipal law; Private law; Public law; Sociology; Liability","score_opus":0.015137105339160696,"score_gpt":0.22632354975131597,"score_spread":0.21118644441215528,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2769961377","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9224553,0.000023291377,0.000032880504,0.0012211207,0.00024766196,0.00011686505,0.000038248738,0.000027169895,0.075837426],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9940679,0.00014826191,0.0000228619,0.000116718445,0.00060123764,9.235842e-8,0.000006078437,0.0000065277413,0.0050303135],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992124,0.000057308567,0.00007281867,0.00023715654,0.0002321161,0.00018824048],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994856,0.00004858224,0.000089143854,0.00016263884,0.000052832536,0.00016119657],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00008033548,0.00010087615,0.00013652006,0.000059478964,0.0011237243,0.00012799696,0.00015884908,0.000101855985,0.0000064694686],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000022959479,0.00011154527,0.000022807757,0.000047728856,0.00028462106,0.0006371198,0.00006474795,0.0000880579,0.0000026038122],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003988506,0.0002144925,0.57915556,0.000065165324,0.00038338196,0.0008821229,0.028006954,0.000095115705,0.000880917,0.32223007,0.011824004,0.05586336],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005628253,0.0000858511,0.24635266,0.00002584462,0.000060735394,6.482071e-7,0.0012081804,0.00007134196,0.000060834973,0.00061107293,0.750743,0.00021702138],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.64526534,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7385139,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.73891896,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016222638,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015459066,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8642892},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2778109760","doi":"","title":"Canadian Bar Association. Meeting","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biographies | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Association (psychology); Bar (unit); Psychology; Geography; Meteorology","score_opus":0.008448659156581974,"score_gpt":0.22379385940653446,"score_spread":0.2153452002499525,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2778109760","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06623811,0.00042480885,0.0000023812381,0.034211542,0.001076458,0.00024573412,0.00024192115,0.000060728627,0.8974983],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9636743,0.013047411,0.000182998,0.0005426398,0.00075536955,0.000022305388,0.000009694786,0.00002517522,0.021740088],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980917,0.00012811483,0.00030644104,0.00023599633,0.0004243879,0.0008133634],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99804014,0.00018810746,0.0001618563,0.00020796008,0.00026518045,0.0011367564],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008408746,0.0001382857,0.00019789819,0.002192378,0.00069159,0.00005307003,0.000311324,0.00024879636,0.0010004214],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004898988,0.00012268806,0.00016006615,0.0018976473,0.00022397743,0.0002567537,0.0000120354625,0.00007867922,0.000071002505],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004763105,0.000012431164,0.74380565,0.00000809963,0.00008994345,0.000012704087,0.0038266017,3.4323494e-7,0.000066916415,0.086845994,0.13888228,0.026444286],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014232258,0.000019127223,0.06001765,0.000036835503,0.000021687867,2.6048457e-7,0.00058661395,1.8709014e-7,0.000015841966,0.0005845978,0.93839717,0.00017769002],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9959952,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9998249,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8974362,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00073678425,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018608232,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999128},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2780698079","doi":"10.1017/s2071832200022483","title":"Opening the Ranks of Constitutional Subjects: Immigration, Identity, and Innovation in Italy and Canada","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"German Law Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Immigration; Subjectivity; Identity (music); Political science; National identity; Sociology; Gender studies; Law; Aesthetics; Epistemology; Politics","score_opus":0.025786940089979612,"score_gpt":0.3309389715755926,"score_spread":0.305152031485613,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2780698079","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9764714,0.00013505995,0.00011440405,0.003218716,0.00022034808,0.00005576102,0.0000028002721,0.0000014168631,0.019780058],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996031,0.00010132841,0.000019239953,0.00008403237,0.00012666147,7.581889e-7,8.1967323e-7,0.0000010188039,0.000063047104],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99942666,0.00004445763,0.00018186591,0.000048178048,0.00021943508,0.00007942428],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99955755,0.00003374765,0.00019965906,0.000052146966,0.00013089378,0.000025996913],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000985586,0.000031989923,0.000060225942,0.0000389462,0.0018060041,0.00029811944,0.00010707938,0.000024162788,0.000026088608],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009181512,0.00002555669,0.000007618402,0.000060805396,0.0006137959,0.00069145876,0.00003126996,0.00010574026,1.3853446e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007473326,0.0000041129883,0.071703024,0.0000029096138,0.0000073709552,0.0000069893654,0.0027588913,0.0000018264229,0.00016771648,0.9235028,0.00017979996,0.0016571073],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010203691,0.000025487807,0.85476834,0.00010486076,0.000021075688,0.00014655793,0.004298093,0.00007305082,0.00016205983,0.022521647,0.11671126,0.00014721772],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.69095856,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.95830244,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9009811,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000040572697,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00027705508,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994935},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2785082277","doi":"","title":"Review of Authorities: Conflicts Cooperation and Transnational Legal Theory by Nicole Roughan","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law and economics; Law; Public administration; Sociology","score_opus":0.012191467901574661,"score_gpt":0.3128944338789071,"score_spread":0.3007029659773324,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2785082277","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.26353297,0.37929395,0.025989104,0.17606789,0.0020254343,0.0017208579,0.00009485478,0.00012459238,0.15115036],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8591373,0.13485263,0.000012293199,0.00023720706,0.00022477082,0.0000040030227,0.000004953015,0.0000061460596,0.0055207163],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99864274,0.00018685638,0.0002278333,0.000105051055,0.0002769438,0.0005605523],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99936086,0.000051648698,0.00022544494,0.000101276266,0.0001916459,0.000069136244],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00398831,0.00007317297,0.00014923427,0.000029141967,0.0012495291,0.00015438149,0.00020764147,0.000063646396,0.000091204965],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000183277,0.000068481226,0.00005968295,0.00003811944,0.00023135393,0.0005427281,0.000011495656,0.00044503776,0.0000010198756],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015955626,0.000020521664,0.00007127624,0.000041671377,0.000032672084,2.1812437e-7,0.0008358587,1.7459384e-7,0.0001975147,0.98039114,0.00035406195,0.018038912],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000679744,0.00024275639,0.0003656157,0.0004459856,0.00007225643,0.000039314218,0.0020360842,0.000018441033,0.00014445923,0.08399868,0.91178685,0.00016980594],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00035423203,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019378779,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9114328,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018452408,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012815696,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9610494},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2788291926","doi":"","title":"The England & Wales Court of Appeal refuses to expand the qualification of victim down the chain to the ultimate consumer (Air Canada / Emerald Supplies)","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"e-Competitions Bulletin","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Damages; Cartel; Law; Appeal; Federal court; New england; Business; High Court; Forensic engineering; Commerce; Supreme court; Engineering; Political science","score_opus":0.019761651201053766,"score_gpt":0.27995213601614233,"score_spread":0.26019048481508855,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2788291926","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24549179,0.0004134954,0.00019729354,0.73427725,0.00063456723,0.0012169321,0.0002531516,0.00003989234,0.017475642],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99554926,0.00016673793,0.000087115084,0.0017261386,0.00026038362,0.00014278293,0.000014912556,0.000009599671,0.0020430784],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99823797,0.0004339297,0.0003426599,0.00015762309,0.00057849474,0.0002493136],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981713,0.0007742065,0.00016712614,0.0004466974,0.00033576405,0.00010490042],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001979082,0.00011027256,0.0001435747,0.000029643614,0.0014076366,0.0000682239,0.0005637246,0.000039479677,0.0003669478],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003662731,0.000053752767,0.000054697775,0.00027985455,0.00040277856,0.000024182973,0.00006808257,0.00013081222,0.000063792766],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020976314,0.00013859943,0.0013919801,0.000017809525,0.000119837845,0.0000011973555,0.14331025,0.00072443055,0.0005491359,0.11427069,0.73560375,0.0036625867],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018980222,0.000033478373,0.0038357473,0.000021401745,0.000020534793,0.0000012415576,0.022329085,0.000011759262,0.00026774395,0.00012484677,0.97308743,0.00007690772],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.42001662,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7290404,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.75005746,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008339113,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00036564714,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998924},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2788528529","doi":"10.5287/ora-r5ky09kxg","title":"Private international law aspects of cross-border wrongs on the internet","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"Oxford University Research Archive (ORA) (University of Oxford)","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Choice of law; The Internet; Conflict of laws; Discretion; Law; Context (archaeology); Political science; Tort; Forum shopping; Common law; Legal aspects of computing; Geography; Computer science","score_opus":0.02515402789112517,"score_gpt":0.33671233908109827,"score_spread":0.3115583111899731,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2788528529","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.32504088,0.000015406145,0.00017949351,0.0010159889,0.00026302974,0.00047733486,0.00024115304,0.000038396884,0.6727283],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8011116,0.0010982672,0.00027713896,0.000023507875,0.00014306839,4.0195096e-7,0.0007740929,0.00002755112,0.19654441],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962905,0.00058225624,0.00022745976,0.0005518016,0.001741052,0.00060692773],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99723357,0.00063313625,0.00045237926,0.00046261534,0.0010211334,0.00019717381],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011874675,0.0002569895,0.00041001634,0.0008004411,0.0014964582,0.00010470096,0.0020816703,0.00032229506,0.0019735033],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014186611,0.00028771616,0.00038255643,0.00073658297,0.0023922888,0.00055961777,0.0004523485,0.0010542019,0.000016437483],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0016315202,0.0002978458,0.0021088088,0.000088262634,0.00028142182,0.00007636866,0.0153115615,0.000025090221,0.0002403698,0.9712906,0.0038306876,0.0048174975],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00078456756,0.0003099671,0.021003164,0.00024792503,0.000052557585,7.2430515e-7,0.023654392,0.00011696156,0.00017621495,0.0077560176,0.94563264,0.00026488374],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.028337007,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09686671,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96353453,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00045036216,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000613113,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999575},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2788772058","doi":"10.4172/2475-319x.1000133","title":"Innocent Suspects Lying by Omission","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Forensic Psychology","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Lying; Medicine","score_opus":0.02871784244804488,"score_gpt":0.38954189582274645,"score_spread":0.3608240533747016,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2788772058","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8463043,0.00044282211,0.0013402519,0.017671458,0.005057675,0.0000729681,0.0000010608712,0.000021005375,0.12908848],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99530613,0.0003143994,0.000463107,0.0013153307,0.0019318529,3.3240303e-7,4.2078278e-7,0.0000062683275,0.0006621661],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990338,0.00010434126,0.00029131613,0.00009501295,0.00025531143,0.00022019341],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999145,0.000041976204,0.00029735523,0.0000915344,0.00028951743,0.0001346589],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007576854,0.00006148477,0.00015082002,0.00010251693,0.00025392784,0.000025270727,0.0001623795,0.000105268686,0.00045795887],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012296558,0.00005101722,0.000070921094,0.00018319506,0.00032983022,0.00013602216,0.000013454575,0.00016211775,0.000028155453],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026837247,0.00015802582,0.0050870464,0.0000029832877,0.000054138123,0.000034700646,0.00974362,2.0548751e-7,0.016819196,0.010043066,0.6624216,0.29536703],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00060102675,0.00046038677,0.0065715085,0.000027717744,0.000012737587,0.000046139983,0.00049472944,0.0000028271575,0.0009139329,0.0043358263,0.9864647,0.000068479596],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000068361915,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00010322346,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3240431,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006258204,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007943621,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.50143284},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2789962272","doi":"10.1093/law/9780199678983.003.0004","title":"The Incidental Question","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); Conflict of laws; Political science; International law; Law; English law; Computer science","score_opus":0.027903546324027882,"score_gpt":0.26347178146017597,"score_spread":0.23556823513614808,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2789962272","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00005979428,0.000073430325,0.000026816992,0.00017099953,0.0005520703,0.00023819227,0.000019852238,0.00008519643,0.99877363],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0030720737,0.0016525794,0.000009752944,0.000015040205,0.0003676532,3.5224707e-7,0.0000070579836,0.000012498579,0.994863],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99914235,0.00005029097,0.00008560513,0.00019419857,0.00033683146,0.00019071727],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99916077,0.000064458676,0.00023513137,0.00033803613,0.0001037589,0.00009786589],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003105819,0.00013277534,0.00012677099,0.000040018145,0.0031487492,0.00020574573,0.0005890277,0.00028539592,0.000030974406],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000017721617,0.00012713905,0.00013337184,0.0000014788505,0.00061576784,0.00012814057,0.00018537762,0.000263902,0.000002642906],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030020927,0.0000017251612,0.0000061716405,0.0000028586933,0.000029362624,0.000020258116,0.0008299714,1.2079057e-7,8.911975e-7,0.9593222,0.0014703935,0.038285993],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012410988,0.000018828174,0.000044931396,0.00005258304,0.00006132046,9.0784306e-7,0.00014044138,0.0000028593545,0.0000029965302,0.002588686,0.9968146,0.00014770273],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027665906,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0063454146,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9953442,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022181138,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015306206,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99814904},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2790148011","doi":"10.17118/11143/11941","title":"La convention sur la protection des enfants et la coopération en matière d'adoption internationale et sa mise en œuvre en droit québécois","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue de droit Université de Sherbrooke","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Institut National de la Recherche Scientifique","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Art","score_opus":0.011080558277926885,"score_gpt":0.24372276978766982,"score_spread":0.23264221150974293,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2790148011","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.71557844,0.00046311013,0.012342834,0.0032940125,0.00032134284,0.0005792384,0.0000528029,0.00016007537,0.26720813],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7074347,0.0056969896,0.0011425981,0.00012831778,0.00060695724,0.000024025601,0.00009949572,0.000042797572,0.2848241],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99693596,0.0016330562,0.00032893996,0.00039112542,0.00035278485,0.0003581157],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99877155,0.00043997442,0.00025523684,0.00018027824,0.00018047584,0.00017249829],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021974,0.00023324354,0.00023910099,0.00021292566,0.0003672604,0.00016784466,0.00026406386,0.0006381279,0.0006258257],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014744017,0.00033664465,0.00021083973,0.0003399047,0.00020855575,0.0011973839,0.00008611702,0.00043120483,0.00012464587],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023555616,0.00046529414,0.0032827454,0.00043820313,0.00018294105,0.00007730539,0.07896854,0.001680608,0.0053925943,0.5941175,0.0004345836,0.31472412],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011078903,0.00011749688,0.034025688,0.00079027103,0.00017157836,0.00017227545,0.0023980131,0.009619111,0.0006246502,0.0025116617,0.94809616,0.00036521952],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019639384,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08340465,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9476616,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036790848,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00037799304,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99990857},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2790327354","doi":"","title":"Introduction to Quebec law","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.010565973658349104,"score_gpt":0.24119502587250896,"score_spread":0.23062905221415986,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2790327354","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03357068,0.0000344797,0.000036028756,0.047602214,0.0009975462,0.00026812495,0.000031475916,0.00005204946,0.9174074],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6985377,0.00034433047,0.00028461564,0.0013918607,0.005239208,0.00003442887,0.000005551469,0.00002585041,0.29413646],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988765,0.00006480249,0.0002053323,0.00022058403,0.0002568391,0.00037590665],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989667,0.000049677656,0.00005627272,0.00022582234,0.00011248082,0.000589027],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00034186192,0.00009071066,0.00013943882,0.00029996346,0.0002735149,0.000029285495,0.00018248417,0.00009328237,0.001110575],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012441422,0.00007761115,0.000054879874,0.00026800352,0.00017316495,0.00022111482,0.000013833859,0.000047040754,0.00013301533],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009991585,0.0000085333995,0.0006412841,0.0000037055602,0.000010153066,0.00000470264,0.0025131449,5.7045463e-7,0.00024477995,0.8279189,0.07762211,0.091022134],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010261262,0.000029537507,0.004119307,0.00001562511,0.0000084097765,6.130773e-7,0.00015983444,7.704643e-8,0.00010585837,0.0009482341,0.9943893,0.00012060711],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97977835,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9990355,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9167672,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003406238,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000633267,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99980253},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2790639434","doi":"","title":"Ottawa law review special issue","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.014281023691317672,"score_gpt":0.262344268986645,"score_spread":0.2480632452953273,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2790639434","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0004845444,0.0010594216,0.0000021144565,0.015820524,0.0009274868,0.00033424175,0.000058394195,0.000034700945,0.9812786],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.09883776,0.13166714,0.00048631005,0.016758626,0.03624759,0.00011504188,0.000027144159,0.000110500594,0.71574986],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99851185,0.00011020831,0.00034224705,0.00021772213,0.00036417364,0.00045380395],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998831,0.00009123112,0.0001200569,0.0002610167,0.00011910415,0.000577633],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005575105,0.00012486306,0.0002620619,0.00017248622,0.00030121874,0.000020963294,0.00029238922,0.000113266105,0.007278475],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001623701,0.00010252708,0.000110497924,0.00024986514,0.00030316014,0.0002109668,0.000016074338,0.00007072362,0.00028106925],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002523957,0.000008075151,0.0006174798,0.000045739016,0.000011160955,0.0000120776285,0.00062025466,1.5688167e-8,0.0000070498313,0.5396447,0.36633018,0.09270074],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013687213,0.000025275122,0.001244042,0.00035422528,0.000024407202,0.0000010022999,0.00003637163,2.6415517e-8,0.000010712956,0.0011468988,0.99686295,0.00015720862],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.75537777,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9799389,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6305328,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019021724,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00073354575,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.993629},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2791241774","doi":"","title":"University of British Columbia law review centennial edition.","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Centennial; Law; History; Political science; Archaeology","score_opus":0.010110544497024655,"score_gpt":0.2089371662173512,"score_spread":0.19882662172032656,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2791241774","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012296744,0.0010061291,0.000009414633,0.002408461,0.00047633922,0.00032545347,0.0006488691,0.000028341681,0.98280025],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.60660636,0.1363646,0.00028949926,0.0017106013,0.0012434003,0.0000059765885,0.000041060575,0.000035523113,0.25370297],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99905837,0.00008371817,0.00019037272,0.00015190158,0.00025584677,0.00025980562],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991439,0.00005275978,0.000123147,0.00014877654,0.00018496715,0.00034645773],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00029855917,0.000050931616,0.0002020259,0.00005473584,0.00024146381,0.000015943113,0.00020853383,0.00008418516,0.0023117536],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005929649,0.000074871365,0.0000947082,0.00017798139,0.00040367316,0.00018469889,0.000016096683,0.00004635211,0.000015833175],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008021396,0.000041552852,0.009076957,0.00019667992,0.000040754097,0.000059828282,0.00077008107,4.505381e-8,0.00002577664,0.077761546,0.80898046,0.10303828],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019899604,0.00002354651,0.013419687,0.0006202548,0.000029661167,0.0000014618278,0.00009760745,5.0678906e-8,7.761863e-7,0.00045444944,0.9850587,0.00009480576],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99150527,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99935454,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7290973,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013514148,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00065077044,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99860024},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2791279621","doi":"","title":"Canadian law, fifth edition.","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; History","score_opus":0.01244289478975106,"score_gpt":0.23693130776376556,"score_spread":0.2244884129740145,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2791279621","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011347908,0.00009508022,0.000008302439,0.010708154,0.00095019117,0.00023989422,0.0002626401,0.00004485797,0.976343],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93577284,0.0008016825,0.00010439709,0.0014281919,0.0013211491,0.00002669818,0.000015629033,0.000025285792,0.060504105],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983981,0.00007961726,0.00026137775,0.00023399867,0.0003306733,0.0006962376],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997918,0.00009720771,0.0000804004,0.00025579287,0.00014808979,0.0015005206],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003786698,0.00013270613,0.00018253237,0.0005265952,0.00059904426,0.00004133512,0.00029717837,0.00017966279,0.0022628056],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011192498,0.00011771054,0.00008830916,0.00028481166,0.00028961603,0.00029113126,0.000011038578,0.00008223674,0.00014028096],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004159098,0.00000813884,0.0051474203,0.0000059279378,0.000019583917,0.00002908437,0.00303507,2.8472945e-7,0.000018932224,0.90111697,0.060680542,0.029933888],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017213527,0.000025755739,0.0070591695,0.00003717228,0.000013259261,0.0000012241251,0.00018960181,2.847743e-7,0.0000143737225,0.003503408,0.9888031,0.00018051335],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99857384,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999326,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9281226,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00073946436,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003274317,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99864924},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2791684113","doi":"","title":"Damages for Breach and Interpretation of Jurisdiction Agreements in Common Law Canada","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Damages; Jurisprudence; Law; Subject-matter jurisdiction; Interpretation (philosophy); Enforcement; Political science; Common law; Conflict of laws; Business; Original jurisdiction; Computer science","score_opus":0.026790064369380216,"score_gpt":0.3329113235339074,"score_spread":0.3061212591645272,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2791684113","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.33080515,0.06945959,0.000046615525,0.29515293,0.0016498234,0.0059966627,0.00031424948,0.000028324475,0.29654664],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9923203,0.0063306675,0.0000075956996,0.0010271708,0.00003350451,0.000018745304,0.0000066307675,0.0000032741243,0.00025214115],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99947286,0.0000800219,0.0001453373,0.00007228804,0.00010552446,0.00012397101],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995347,0.000039739076,0.00011455281,0.00017679248,0.000047608195,0.00008658949],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007170422,0.00004397879,0.00013218756,0.000017958131,0.00069929706,0.000045206667,0.00017939796,0.000024926867,0.000027563474],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006070155,0.000036450045,0.000020728248,0.000030435638,0.00013212592,0.0001052672,0.000011187881,0.00004694138,6.27828e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015248614,0.000013499577,0.017072503,0.0010078087,0.000040906074,0.000003995011,0.0076007308,0.0000021192625,0.000009275281,0.26599246,0.012694948,0.6955465],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012592819,0.000015721998,0.040481005,0.00093332323,0.000034952922,5.2674903e-7,0.00015482765,0.000080635364,0.0000046055848,0.0009951945,0.9571086,0.00006464503],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9979785,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999675,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94441366,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021006419,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00047316673,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.53784984},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2791850572","doi":"","title":"Canada Law Book Limited.","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biographies | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.013927806475409015,"score_gpt":0.24334327731679034,"score_spread":0.22941547084138134,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2791850572","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014116907,0.0010612891,5.903145e-7,0.014579765,0.0012766878,0.00021625296,0.00017743942,0.000028464417,0.9685426],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96675,0.015624091,0.00007716836,0.002155422,0.0006618705,0.000017138227,0.000015329853,0.000020900094,0.014678062],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985422,0.0000514025,0.00024051109,0.00021916276,0.0004087854,0.0005379362],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983932,0.00005278263,0.00019517544,0.00053301686,0.00015468308,0.0006711874],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00026108112,0.00013994455,0.00020575138,0.0005508325,0.0020476175,0.00013875138,0.00064104336,0.00013868645,0.00040656692],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000112286696,0.00015168454,0.00011812772,0.00046724683,0.0010186157,0.00036196224,0.000032093583,0.00011067314,0.0000063532866],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010819153,0.000018786732,0.043398302,0.000017057444,0.00006831228,0.000047203663,0.0016568863,7.535022e-7,0.000009789215,0.4636821,0.48314738,0.007942621],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000119660675,0.000020198175,0.044753835,0.000018693658,0.00002070656,5.175806e-7,0.00034916165,5.291305e-7,0.000014722263,0.00030711092,0.9542177,0.00017718971],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99991506,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99999577,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9538645,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011863672,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002441294,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992516},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2792079564","doi":"10.11575/prism/34157","title":"Pure economic loss claims","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PRISM (University of Calgary)","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Economics","score_opus":0.01216955272951178,"score_gpt":0.2269849192101994,"score_spread":0.2148153664806876,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2792079564","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7139533,0.00005571026,0.009095034,0.0034505967,0.00019185807,0.000096433854,2.653012e-7,0.00005819929,0.2730986],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9770932,0.0009434747,0.0011143425,0.000054708707,0.00007267874,9.676394e-8,0.0000035490639,0.00000492465,0.020713028],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994978,0.000041763433,0.000056491248,0.0001229677,0.00012640694,0.00015459246],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99968696,0.000023762552,0.000061928775,0.000108071516,0.000024987627,0.00009431567],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00017204187,0.000048537797,0.000100594465,0.000059004415,0.00035711497,0.000011860397,0.0002025121,0.00009226761,0.0015687129],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000003903768,0.00006496551,0.00007669315,0.00006951199,0.00022805415,0.00022464317,0.00004186822,0.00007439852,0.00013168203],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012716574,0.00011520933,0.03322484,0.000013782055,0.00007167588,0.00016234074,0.041701164,0.0000022039976,0.00012386519,0.16162744,0.0103878835,0.7524424],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032208613,0.000028411589,0.01883472,0.0000071707527,0.000017434168,0.0000019633505,0.0009240087,0.0005665097,0.000009472785,0.0024147027,0.97677433,0.00009920821],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0093972,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013738303,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96638644,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000924849,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009498989,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999344},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2792770270","doi":"","title":"Canada: The British Columbia Court of Appeal refuses to rule on a class action of indirect purchasers (Sun-Rype Products/Archer Daniels Midland ; Pro Sys Consultants/Microsoft Corporation )","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Concurrences Review","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Class action; Law; Corporation; Political science; Humanities; Sociology; Art; Computer science","score_opus":0.07854447336416934,"score_gpt":0.3345121602147928,"score_spread":0.25596768685062343,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2792770270","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8882025,0.08533441,0.00005383241,0.009288279,0.0028484445,0.005292245,0.00038376087,0.00008046732,0.008516098],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9762891,0.022082578,0.000042100615,0.00041387847,0.00020571158,0.000083509585,0.000026784406,0.000008165509,0.00084817165],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980573,0.00039640712,0.00046621662,0.00022883154,0.0005655755,0.00028566786],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99841213,0.00019153999,0.00051080936,0.00021892662,0.00053843675,0.00012812842],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015499918,0.000106060186,0.0003897088,0.00002139694,0.0004434477,0.00013229882,0.0002963638,0.00006462519,0.00008812897],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010545696,0.00010632149,0.000049017828,0.0007312906,0.00029401586,0.0002425795,0.00003573693,0.00014302059,0.0000048476913],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004761449,0.00039411522,0.061965838,0.0041528298,0.00016518352,0.0000039363085,0.005173982,0.0000025526815,0.0020360819,0.0014300027,0.24373873,0.6808891],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015470952,0.000103954895,0.012910198,0.0021961227,0.00006677697,0.0000042805814,0.00037848993,0.0000024758692,0.00042998634,0.00001899343,0.98357636,0.00015766473],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5812596,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8145199,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.73983765,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014420792,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015899724,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.43356645},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2793490968","doi":"","title":"Canada : La Cour d'appel de la Colombie-Britannique refuse de certifier un recours collectif des acheteurs indirects (Sun-Rype Products Ltd. v. Archer Daniels Midland Company - Pro Sys Consultants Ltd. v. Microsoft Corporation )","year":2012,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue Concurrences","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04645014931346661,"score_gpt":0.30500126485241574,"score_spread":0.25855111553894916,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2793490968","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9564795,0.024119794,0.000110163455,0.0071373023,0.0031101867,0.0012728269,0.00028317727,0.00012805984,0.007359004],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98215383,0.0046800217,0.0011228138,0.0002127887,0.00090748613,0.00012076355,0.000047601494,0.000047509784,0.010707178],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99408907,0.0026281408,0.00070783874,0.00068539503,0.0005327976,0.0013567839],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995783,0.0015290078,0.0007200913,0.00035830832,0.0008009129,0.00080868625],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034404856,0.00049660733,0.00066772377,0.00013359086,0.0011469836,0.00044194842,0.00059526344,0.00061374746,0.00014014935],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023522053,0.00054520863,0.00010221823,0.001606473,0.0018070455,0.0008377972,0.00009923062,0.00076699676,0.000016305788],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00029362898,0.0017272538,0.589496,0.0018467098,0.0006934171,0.00024041694,0.09356217,0.00004987691,0.01761126,0.011477601,0.11654899,0.16645263],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010994356,0.00023178096,0.08327455,0.0013009299,0.00030151845,0.0003142671,0.00389245,0.00022450028,0.012441296,0.0010478739,0.8947812,0.001090196],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.26850474,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.26389447,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7782322,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014468986,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009033203,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99969995},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2793750418","doi":"","title":"Constitutional law: a charter litigation manual: Canadian Bar Association - Ontario, 1992 Institute of Continuing Legal [...]","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Charter; Political science; Constitutional law","score_opus":0.010650670112996894,"score_gpt":0.23302150666323432,"score_spread":0.22237083655023743,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2793750418","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17118447,0.000034634864,0.000020454378,0.0046221875,0.0009321735,0.00034112053,0.00030995012,0.000025560754,0.82252944],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97404623,0.00009491347,0.000104901446,0.00034483126,0.00036518055,0.000019531288,0.000041861917,0.0000086904665,0.024973867],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981833,0.00008673701,0.00045293712,0.0002349982,0.0004909219,0.0005510747],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99851453,0.00008378133,0.00026047416,0.00017137437,0.00026880988,0.00070103124],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006631897,0.00014615477,0.0002660984,0.000335709,0.0003656117,0.000046899204,0.00019760343,0.00023477744,0.000851526],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016978118,0.00014353254,0.00011047533,0.00017569956,0.00060348416,0.0006980399,0.000011348037,0.00012301904,0.000028571529],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007087098,0.000009360359,0.050856706,0.0000074194554,0.000038205777,0.0000117300115,0.0041471724,0.0000011378494,0.000062333245,0.93446434,0.0039616027,0.006432913],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035441725,0.000027611704,0.045683283,0.0001065985,0.000031562202,0.0000015240212,0.00011783709,7.5746135e-7,0.00005378514,0.0009971593,0.95245135,0.00017412467],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99916697,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99996656,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9484897,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022741565,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0043326053,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.93236125},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2795200660","doi":"","title":"Accès - Secteur public : La Cour de cassation rejette le pourvoi dans l'affaire de l'accès à l'Abattoir de Laval (Privileg...)","year":2006,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue Concurrences","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.024188158784894494,"score_gpt":0.2793382239535228,"score_spread":0.2551500651686283,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2795200660","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8653699,0.00821709,0.003041277,0.051059958,0.0026663952,0.0004050468,0.00011498628,0.0002748295,0.06885051],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98140156,0.0027379936,0.0005174375,0.00018048333,0.0038684183,0.000051273284,0.000052880107,0.00003853881,0.01115142],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99566615,0.0013962414,0.0006028129,0.0006052235,0.00050247734,0.0012271277],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99788177,0.0006106441,0.00046689608,0.00031589755,0.00025481777,0.0004699761],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026611192,0.00037545312,0.0004383198,0.00015503219,0.0011040025,0.0006989045,0.0006953622,0.00056937156,0.00038934415],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00051595585,0.0004385471,0.00028029314,0.0008206911,0.00092372776,0.0010785911,0.00010936425,0.00060948497,0.00007750473],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031362164,0.0007476856,0.37382096,0.00040676488,0.00015311698,0.00032308578,0.041258205,0.0003146168,0.0054900125,0.23024797,0.043832265,0.30337396],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000586703,0.000118066004,0.08958521,0.000374982,0.00013587139,0.00020936123,0.00577784,0.004667214,0.00044211888,0.006080621,0.89140356,0.0006184815],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03657131,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05706165,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84757125,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008464117,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003473441,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99980664},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2795599869","doi":"10.29173/alr1318","title":"From Many Different Stones: A House of Justice","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Globe; Law; Human rights; Economic Justice; Political science; Globalization; Supreme court; International law; International court; Sociology; Law and economics; Public international law; Psychology","score_opus":0.029136999425136954,"score_gpt":0.32090465755887626,"score_spread":0.2917676581337393,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2795599869","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15726857,0.15815553,0.00015656055,0.0072592157,0.001469014,0.0013541359,0.0000140106295,0.00011752149,0.6742054],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88631433,0.10845861,0.00008083292,0.0020759313,0.00017836774,0.000027815013,0.0000043123673,0.000019895102,0.0028398847],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989427,0.00024042053,0.0002603278,0.00015990066,0.00023162468,0.00016505155],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99916816,0.0003258513,0.00012317978,0.00024092478,0.000052060965,0.00008985439],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00026129017,0.00009244583,0.00029254254,0.000010119932,0.00016181215,0.00001768071,0.00014475296,0.00005032416,0.0012794564],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00024852078,0.00007537208,0.00011378419,0.00012682834,0.000114124596,0.00008898951,0.000014869742,0.00006325681,0.000106241925],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002819174,0.000094462936,0.00037983336,0.0005039386,0.000032922864,0.0000014041076,0.002723134,1.0572799e-7,0.000032486336,0.9884198,0.0018280243,0.0059811193],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010537827,0.000016307089,0.000375444,0.00092631544,0.0002594537,5.232414e-7,0.00013581682,8.3945525e-7,0.000044291406,0.0007094868,0.99733216,0.000093980365],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.060478676,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019581003,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99550414,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002913354,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000042147938,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996335},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2796507726","doi":"10.1017/s0069005800008201","title":"L’offense aux souverains et chefs de gouvernement étrangers par la voie de la presse. Par Jean-F. Marinus. Collection de droit international, Éditions Bruylant. Bruxelles: Éditions de l’Université de Bruxelles, 2002. 587 pp.","year":2003,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Yearbook of international Law/Annuaire canadien de droit international","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Art","score_opus":0.00768690730649266,"score_gpt":0.2343184618051722,"score_spread":0.22663155449867955,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2796507726","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16314596,0.0012937759,0.0037291634,0.027155561,0.0029982906,0.00070644746,0.0056341314,0.00013790243,0.79519874],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8441815,0.006213684,0.0021294856,0.0035979918,0.0010666213,0.00015586596,0.00065325364,0.00012044506,0.14188118],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9955438,0.00070100644,0.0007465133,0.0006917255,0.0009669298,0.0013500656],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959968,0.00074911024,0.00048609587,0.00034459832,0.00086208596,0.0015613335],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020404411,0.00047573607,0.00039578314,0.00069935207,0.0011563953,0.00036994426,0.0013064301,0.0006832522,0.009919884],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000779837,0.00072042504,0.00045018448,0.00040604864,0.0012242121,0.0007286054,0.00011334615,0.00082869275,0.00007800704],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001315625,0.00034250785,0.016422553,0.000038414833,0.0010819052,0.00068437896,0.009790672,0.0030948194,0.0003138881,0.62995356,0.33749655,0.0006491823],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014874077,0.00011075682,0.033435892,0.00039885603,0.0002052971,0.0006503073,0.0017315379,0.004646829,0.00044171038,0.015858287,0.94038606,0.0006470915],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5179385,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8056475,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6810355,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.028099485,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010521484,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995247},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2799673227","doi":"10.7202/1044707ar","title":"ANALYSE CRITIQUE DE L’INTERVENTION NOTARIALE DANS LES RELATIONS JURIDIQUES INTERNATIONALES ISSUES DE L’IMMIGRATION AU QUÉBEC","year":2013,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue du notariat","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.01662808653333349,"score_gpt":0.3016808259440576,"score_spread":0.2850527394107241,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2799673227","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7975158,0.002861865,0.034861065,0.15747888,0.001247527,0.00038305257,0.000038658007,0.00012070245,0.005492451],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95604223,0.0025688575,0.0018291383,0.00015064368,0.0035951966,0.00011276492,0.00008897323,0.00003052674,0.03558168],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997614,0.00066982955,0.00062334037,0.00036719974,0.00026975267,0.00045587463],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99852437,0.00032303884,0.0003134835,0.00023567218,0.0004078713,0.0001955775],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009948652,0.00023824938,0.00027790532,0.00016653455,0.0007681466,0.00029233418,0.00027700645,0.00036685122,0.002244144],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005194617,0.00028129676,0.00036190418,0.0003142242,0.00029844066,0.0011164234,0.000059241414,0.0003018836,0.00034027867],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000044742577,0.0008913446,0.3823753,0.00020349285,0.00037053454,0.000021447571,0.27551872,0.0016913337,0.0041666236,0.26619083,0.012742111,0.055783525],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00047025146,0.00020155113,0.26182565,0.0005867618,0.00037610953,0.000030568946,0.010102488,0.030209588,0.00067491666,0.009009006,0.6860027,0.0005104316],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9295801,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.88590497,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.67326057,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002702903,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009503591,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99996394},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2802060371","doi":"10.7202/1044791ar","title":"LES SUCCESSIONS EN DROIT INTERNATIONAL PRIVÉ QUÉBÉCOIS","year":2010,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue du notariat","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.01454646757391599,"score_gpt":0.2898997815445691,"score_spread":0.2753533139706531,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2802060371","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6977489,0.0005977425,0.0005842094,0.1421,0.029901331,0.00024597213,0.000064057094,0.0001077337,0.12865007],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9437175,0.0012759567,0.0006247468,0.00018930467,0.008179285,0.0000146283055,0.000025892017,0.000020190675,0.04595249],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99865216,0.000114802235,0.00030300854,0.00030974773,0.00030822863,0.00031205916],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99904406,0.000224607,0.0001592204,0.00023758358,0.00014916815,0.00018538817],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005664585,0.0001533053,0.00018722612,0.000078547186,0.0005298294,0.0001407287,0.0004736914,0.00036239348,0.0069198688],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003400968,0.00017132385,0.0001690806,0.00023081966,0.00025982189,0.00039714397,0.00011462187,0.00053266075,0.00040024237],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014055267,0.00021837218,0.031745907,0.000024778794,0.000063834996,0.000018464047,0.021356508,0.000011304448,0.0010225059,0.741369,0.0017722157,0.20238307],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021648579,0.000026037202,0.049659602,0.00007373565,0.00004922807,0.000014721507,0.0006075544,0.0007893094,0.000032689375,0.002032231,0.9463052,0.00019321548],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11563168,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.19981231,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.944533,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002029944,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020934264,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9939879},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2804077329","doi":"10.1017/s0069005800007487","title":"Canadian Cases in Private International Law in 1999-2000 / La jurisprudence canadienne en matière de droit international privé en 1999-2000","year":2001,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Yearbook of international Law/Annuaire canadien de droit international","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Jurisprudence; Law; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.006873410630274624,"score_gpt":0.24527255307748072,"score_spread":0.23839914244720609,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2804077329","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.27880242,0.00055776833,0.00004794371,0.041760813,0.0076036626,0.0006892756,0.0035658225,0.000057436933,0.6669149],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9083963,0.001123447,0.00060071546,0.0034929807,0.0026146916,0.00015044714,0.00077513704,0.00011775004,0.08272853],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99287385,0.0004867379,0.0016999098,0.0012070365,0.0014694041,0.002263055],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99500185,0.0006630208,0.0005493996,0.000544017,0.0008780214,0.0023636804],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024400754,0.00073131314,0.0007196676,0.0027173373,0.00034189117,0.0005021784,0.0036974787,0.0009743734,0.010212102],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00089845614,0.0010738283,0.00037944652,0.0008792318,0.00096268236,0.0016819885,0.00022255596,0.0013787382,0.00019479975],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000162637,0.00022758922,0.07857823,0.000033224565,0.0005396887,0.006135001,0.015375224,0.0012179702,0.000052170955,0.8841494,0.0032295415,0.010299355],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001380073,0.00009394867,0.043447454,0.0009507031,0.000050353192,0.0010880068,0.0013604934,0.004132003,0.00004953391,0.01407234,0.93244225,0.00093281956],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9953503,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99968183,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92921275,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07370404,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012511624,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991712},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2804081601","doi":"10.1017/s0069005800008420","title":"Canadian Cases in Private International Lawin 2002-3 / Jurisprudence canadienne en matière de droit international privé en 2002-3","year":2004,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Jurisprudence; Law","score_opus":0.010428720427029399,"score_gpt":0.2702190700593593,"score_spread":0.2597903496323299,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2804081601","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5036707,0.00046994642,0.00037461397,0.12865001,0.0055871387,0.000435037,0.0002532107,0.00006783383,0.36049154],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8346934,0.0011603814,0.0015517807,0.001289268,0.0018841525,0.000032504064,0.00003700581,0.000027515089,0.159324],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972384,0.00017376791,0.00053233444,0.00047872745,0.00052452605,0.001052256],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985864,0.00018477031,0.00013030066,0.00021369856,0.000166213,0.00071859383],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011051124,0.00026037113,0.0002422189,0.00044637945,0.00027136353,0.00023144118,0.0009395764,0.0003534887,0.024556806],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00035576252,0.0003213685,0.00011143262,0.0005254543,0.00023839156,0.0008270868,0.000106222506,0.00043080345,0.00066440215],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004008267,0.00030934147,0.033875,0.000028088181,0.00017286,0.0012907126,0.0413711,0.0014229503,0.0001308121,0.8619477,0.0074549667,0.051956367],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00069278735,0.00006181924,0.053193327,0.00021363763,0.000021597063,0.0001171688,0.0020736263,0.0005736951,0.00009446889,0.0057511763,0.9368116,0.00039509375],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.977769,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9976182,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92935663,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011750019,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020325552,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999238},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2804823524","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.3260","title":"Three Objections to Forum of Necessity: Global Access to Justice, International Criminal Law, and Proper Party","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Rehabilitation Institute","funders":"","keywords":"Plaintiff; Jurisdiction; Law; Adjudication; Political science; Tort; Liability; Civil procedure; Forum shopping; Economic Justice; Business","score_opus":0.046513576739178324,"score_gpt":0.3678885889683903,"score_spread":0.32137501222921194,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2804823524","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.040431447,0.000040893236,0.008641347,0.013234,0.0019526681,0.0002210059,0.000029848607,0.000033032888,0.93541574],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9948256,0.000028073944,0.0014480238,0.002077315,0.0014218328,0.000006496193,0.0000010481153,0.0000068088057,0.00018481794],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987089,0.000053206506,0.0002560039,0.00018623532,0.00049663463,0.00029901275],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99891865,0.000025888032,0.0001179834,0.00010544845,0.0004894683,0.0003425484],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004813077,0.000099503886,0.00014186774,0.000052582578,0.0013918941,0.00048300985,0.00038522275,0.00007231738,0.00047057812],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007968396,0.00008727507,0.000057889225,0.00019894994,0.00027908722,0.00065998215,0.00017726877,0.00013331705,0.000025529895],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000130873,0.00009220214,0.0065085613,0.000008729365,0.00004485419,0.000006322835,0.0024766105,0.000012150843,0.00012716376,0.9732761,0.0039537614,0.013362665],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010891401,0.0009183285,0.048984833,0.00024453658,0.0003324905,0.00017507146,0.0061749863,0.00016093501,0.00063641014,0.10134994,0.83942765,0.0005056884],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.053344447,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7132377,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95439416,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000116613446,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010915206,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99990815},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2805493865","doi":"","title":"LibGuides: Canada Legal Research Guide: Case Law","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"libguides","venue":"","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Legal research","score_opus":0.06150004744115774,"score_gpt":0.3902384504438241,"score_spread":0.3287384030026664,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2805493865","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00061218004,0.0005767768,0.0000046462724,0.02005887,0.006216032,0.000510344,0.00015194513,0.00018185328,0.9716874],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.018003631,0.00085463095,0.00034074127,0.0025861007,0.009793366,0.00005584198,0.0001034726,0.00007928823,0.9681829],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99476904,0.0005303424,0.0006249709,0.0006389454,0.0023114656,0.0011252414],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99661905,0.00081819744,0.0001500005,0.00069874927,0.0011621953,0.00055182766],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039215526,0.0002982963,0.00041894356,0.00019903875,0.0030344608,0.00072481955,0.0008439123,0.0009920555,0.006421063],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00080593635,0.0002819694,0.00014585344,0.0005239544,0.0009798768,0.00032243415,0.00023698599,0.002189083,0.000090844755],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000029782536,0.000014796899,0.0000062686318,0.000020610833,0.000022456557,0.0021497644,0.0006293868,1.7879074e-7,0.000003975614,0.1953565,0.79837734,0.0034157236],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010794363,0.00003167471,0.0000035087623,0.00004857,0.000021787588,0.00015720575,0.002862494,0.0000042872266,0.000037470814,0.0005210717,0.9958568,0.00034716472],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9997335,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99994403,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19747947,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008250302,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01248642,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999632},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2808153947","doi":"10.11575/prism/29095","title":"O'Reilly v. Director, Southern Region, Regional Services, Alberta Environment","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PRISM (University of Calgary)","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Telecommunications; Public administration; Political science; Engineering","score_opus":0.008305067575239697,"score_gpt":0.18504990313494551,"score_spread":0.17674483555970583,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2808153947","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6101332,0.00056655315,0.017051628,0.011420687,0.00020161609,0.0003715995,0.0000011754026,0.00013701628,0.36011654],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.78586054,0.0008206417,0.0045449715,0.00025483637,0.00023458994,7.821889e-7,0.000053920365,0.000025282236,0.20820446],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991049,0.000076430086,0.0000915529,0.00019644907,0.00034053958,0.00019013115],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995503,0.00004651799,0.0001241125,0.00016034205,0.000031588173,0.00008717914],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00013415923,0.00008225761,0.00012658566,0.00006082274,0.00044738944,0.000012706009,0.00024076944,0.00011146501,0.00052325334],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000002672436,0.000102510705,0.000100132,0.00008643105,0.00025697635,0.00015480495,0.00005576062,0.000060352053,0.00010393066],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00048007327,0.0013255,0.1758394,0.00015859633,0.00030436605,0.00020254451,0.2075113,0.000018291623,0.0015415596,0.20170075,0.047545496,0.36337215],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033641647,0.000021221238,0.033937402,0.000017050157,0.000030194797,0.0000010534886,0.0010868293,0.00032850276,0.000007527173,0.0010288421,0.9630699,0.00013504752],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.24449107,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010251727,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9155244,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008541488,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000052889318,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.76053995},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2809508227","doi":"","title":"The Divergent Paths of Commonwealth Privacy Torts","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Commonwealth; Political science; Law; Common law; Jurisprudence; Context (archaeology); Privacy policy; Privacy law; Normative; English law; Harmonization; Information privacy; Law and economics; Sociology; Geography","score_opus":0.013567864239714175,"score_gpt":0.30299308994022567,"score_spread":0.2894252257005115,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2809508227","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9574394,0.0031229896,0.0011192426,0.008400417,0.0013559723,0.00018250958,0.0000013353709,0.000030082563,0.028348004],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9839249,0.012641332,0.00000924327,0.000051186904,0.00096558465,0.0000012119904,2.5892558e-7,0.000005181507,0.00240106],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99805313,0.00016067945,0.00020617685,0.000074467556,0.00036746226,0.0011380744],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99938565,0.0000606827,0.00018692281,0.00012199014,0.00016640805,0.00007832448],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031011049,0.000056097077,0.00008380683,0.000036118938,0.0016003612,0.000048359,0.0003112465,0.00004114268,0.00006831783],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008988162,0.000038623257,0.00007523188,0.00016990017,0.00025734343,0.000103052094,0.00003759334,0.0004605868,0.000013623712],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041902196,0.00004476357,0.009069308,0.0000011249479,0.00005878644,5.1791926e-7,0.008371044,3.4494028e-7,0.00007617306,0.8303916,0.0007440534,0.15120037],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024335133,0.00047213482,0.0064889123,0.0000119896995,0.000019475734,0.000014301734,0.006881783,0.000009445668,0.00007999187,0.14281686,0.84287745,0.000084276115],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014127847,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017097604,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8421334,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00044739313,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019548456,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996994},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2810951285","doi":"","title":"Ward v. Canada (Attorney General)","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Betascript Publishing eBooks","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.019715544655884546,"score_gpt":0.24433362194941793,"score_spread":0.2246180772935334,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2810951285","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00030142124,0.00028714607,0.000011519128,0.004148947,0.0101853,0.00043679873,0.00020390941,0.00030462208,0.9841203],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.001505262,0.000029157758,0.00019227403,0.0027085175,0.008005923,0.000036100475,0.00030445203,0.00009663948,0.9871217],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9959847,0.00016833517,0.0005413855,0.0006809004,0.0017670235,0.0008576825],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976199,0.00012707763,0.00042879515,0.0007055285,0.00050436216,0.00061433215],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014498048,0.0004382111,0.0005417449,0.00020787427,0.001165957,0.0031945303,0.0013377727,0.0012152462,0.0007247092],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00048575617,0.00046654278,0.00024710372,0.00006999037,0.00032902477,0.00084710954,0.0002069571,0.002076253,0.000027986962],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000037967773,0.000005596788,0.0000218939,0.000019906023,0.000054679105,0.00002783857,0.0016824566,2.283707e-7,0.000024570225,0.15110491,0.8247246,0.022329478],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019166022,0.000013335357,0.000060549617,0.0000678681,0.00007866427,0.0000029227117,0.0001321323,0.0000031300287,0.000019807903,0.00436554,0.9945309,0.0005334458],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9085787,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9867083,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1698063,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013562231,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016007315,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997786},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2811186273","doi":"10.7202/1045583ar","title":"RECENSION ET CRITIQUE. Aleksander STEPKOWSKI, L’Institution du trust dans le système mixte de droit privé écossais, Varsovie, Liber, 2005, p. 198","year":2007,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue du notariat","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Université Laval; Privy Council Office","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Institution; Philosophy; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.012268208121384619,"score_gpt":0.2654924988591995,"score_spread":0.2532242907378149,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2811186273","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.380158,0.026069462,0.21604697,0.15945919,0.01985338,0.0025284218,0.00020144548,0.0007550494,0.19492806],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9357037,0.034019027,0.0017852811,0.0020153117,0.0050582048,0.00003095771,0.000106615684,0.000083939616,0.021196952],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9959374,0.000622972,0.00087388896,0.0007561095,0.00057592045,0.0012337015],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99787617,0.00037975181,0.00038225288,0.0004972135,0.00031286138,0.0005517253],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004359583,0.00043147895,0.00058200257,0.00018221464,0.0013893002,0.00026146998,0.0003996457,0.00079731434,0.00055254356],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000412099,0.00052999886,0.00034845056,0.0006853625,0.00060443295,0.0011005804,0.00012676654,0.0006212829,0.00022773017],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025542802,0.0010142119,0.010599867,0.00044455958,0.00015020331,0.00036233274,0.021939926,0.0005405481,0.0015222651,0.91129905,0.0138654895,0.038006138],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014051185,0.00013878255,0.03142628,0.0009261236,0.0002326075,0.00021014335,0.0010582157,0.002186234,0.0003712293,0.0065320865,0.9548265,0.00068671396],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.025590923,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.027837956,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.940961,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020552818,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00082979543,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999108},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W285780054","doi":"","title":"Presentment and Payment in Cheque Electronic Clearing: Advance Bank v. TD Bank","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Cheque; Clearing; Payment; Business; Bank account; Payment processor; Financial system; Issuing bank; Economics; Finance; Computer science; Computer security","score_opus":0.011974549669402096,"score_gpt":0.2802375553375331,"score_spread":0.268263005668131,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W285780054","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.87173665,0.0033516076,0.000061304025,0.010022508,0.00025093026,0.0006345503,0.000003495069,0.00013534176,0.113803625],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99186116,0.0014797165,0.0002120618,0.00060270645,0.00051613007,0.000050501407,0.000003147432,0.0000137324305,0.0052608415],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99839264,0.00011653882,0.00023739149,0.0003314746,0.00034879424,0.0005731767],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99944705,0.00005192697,0.00006712496,0.00020038728,0.00003431651,0.00019922137],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005944911,0.00013251703,0.00016423089,0.000048579397,0.0003284588,0.00012093041,0.00017173323,0.000098910365,0.0005789655],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000046003443,0.00013664416,0.00004765843,0.00017582241,0.00012950801,0.00043975498,0.000067454894,0.000279993,0.0000982818],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000110213645,0.0003775653,0.027088659,0.000027864166,0.00004688997,0.000014388015,0.0063346103,0.00025142787,0.0011857019,0.86843085,0.0016210562,0.09451079],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00057354005,0.00007943469,0.016469143,0.000028754801,0.000007985499,0.0000011974424,0.0002983371,0.000098248485,0.00047624216,0.0020228368,0.97977054,0.00017375061],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0064416225,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.050798845,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9781495,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004455842,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012801157,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.973785},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2883784538","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.3261","title":"Cross-Border Transfers of Court Proceedings","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Statute; Jurisdiction; Conflict of laws; Choice of law; Political science; Exclusive jurisdiction; Competence (human resources); Subject-matter jurisdiction; Original jurisdiction; Economics","score_opus":0.018092407634794964,"score_gpt":0.3823943637304611,"score_spread":0.3643019560956661,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2883784538","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14079922,0.000049451948,0.0002518483,0.001594003,0.00047428402,0.00007510669,0.0000036216004,0.000029277366,0.8567232],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962361,0.00013663268,0.00031969982,0.00015137385,0.0011773496,0.0000014475261,3.4942803e-7,0.000010717511,0.001966326],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99881613,0.000025698722,0.0002650626,0.000118213466,0.00048376905,0.00029114846],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99902976,0.00002097862,0.00012091724,0.000054298063,0.00060115114,0.00017292547],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00087107084,0.000083072846,0.00014332842,0.000043894186,0.0011344645,0.00020290137,0.00018595418,0.000104155595,0.0026227706],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000035849655,0.000075762575,0.000104126535,0.00014984589,0.0007420947,0.00043470642,0.000011712291,0.00019165828,0.000023916104],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000089566056,0.00009704417,0.00470423,0.000012235226,0.00005052289,0.000004124163,0.0152131,0.0000015244739,0.0022750471,0.9616119,0.0009332542,0.015007425],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010031696,0.00054161967,0.007886099,0.000089803674,0.000050765444,0.000050252544,0.00244918,0.000030841646,0.0030839413,0.016960012,0.96760744,0.00024687976],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016840596,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.042657357,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9666742,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000050646733,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000097689684,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998289},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2884140513","doi":"10.5539/ass.v14n8p153","title":"Family Dispute Resolution from the Perspective of Comparative Law","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Asian Social Science","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rationality; Family law; Perspective (graphical); Law; China; Dispute resolution; Civil law (Civil law); Political science; Resolution (logic); Law and economics; Sociology; Public law; Computer science","score_opus":0.04228712628705835,"score_gpt":0.362150587038631,"score_spread":0.3198634607515727,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2884140513","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.081649035,0.000046490546,0.00028064835,0.005818429,0.00039353996,0.00014866056,0.000016109898,0.000030457504,0.9116166],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99837685,0.0000071278987,0.000111399735,0.0002952805,0.0010464313,0.000003292987,6.9981155e-7,0.0000021765436,0.00015671604],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986374,0.00014541269,0.00011941718,0.00022173558,0.00062235835,0.0002536739],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99921143,0.00007539587,0.000106143605,0.00011436155,0.00043005744,0.00006263514],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008310092,0.000059759648,0.000104680366,0.00002189859,0.0029935928,0.0000947581,0.00045460858,0.000047903966,0.00005957698],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000050716975,0.000046455072,0.0000515957,0.0007825164,0.008069295,0.00036356086,0.000065679356,0.00008503086,0.000031105963],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009248216,0.00001508299,0.00018416333,1.2399916e-7,0.0000034618874,1.1779511e-7,0.16677256,2.1240739e-8,0.0011993411,0.82668495,0.0005653378,0.0045655984],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021254297,0.000115018134,0.46955824,0.000016154883,0.000021813563,1.1509452e-7,0.2328786,0.000028833696,0.00083431805,0.09106654,0.20509928,0.00016854735],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.039958537,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014380699,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91672784,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020723081,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00027724518,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99830437},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2894981321","doi":"","title":"LE CARACTÈRE « EXCEPTIONNEL » FRAPPE ENCORE ! UNE NOUVELLE VICTIME PAR RICOCHET :: LA CLAUSE D’EXCEPTION DE L’ART 3082 CCQ","year":2018,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Appeal; Context (archaeology); Political science; Common law; Confusion; Supreme court; Interpretation (philosophy); Liability; Humanities; Sociology; History; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.018844303494513777,"score_gpt":0.281617003558825,"score_spread":0.26277270006431125,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2894981321","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016079875,0.12814,0.00016306022,0.49000013,0.0020891165,0.0015327327,0.00013299378,0.00011338518,0.36174873],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.82021093,0.13427915,0.00005172394,0.012325794,0.0025544951,0.00006407959,0.000048663733,0.000049005797,0.030416172],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969661,0.000945858,0.00045902285,0.00039534943,0.00039128057,0.0008423448],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980232,0.00011047803,0.00023801923,0.0005761762,0.0002558207,0.00079628994],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021626703,0.00029167923,0.00042777864,0.00008452168,0.002292826,0.00015727806,0.0005547682,0.00035935323,0.0070739016],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014946733,0.00026727974,0.00026213407,0.000989519,0.0013177489,0.0003267762,0.00004547082,0.00045683188,0.005371187],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000095429305,0.00009367167,0.00072551763,0.00061978045,0.000105387706,0.000028486598,0.026103944,0.0000028777981,0.00004052971,0.11694107,0.63136995,0.22395924],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017408855,0.000080673155,0.0048797927,0.0016868288,0.00021786858,0.000029922321,0.0009843793,0.0000374563,0.000007454172,0.0014536113,0.9901336,0.00031434093],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.58125097,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8935268,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.80413103,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007585216,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029929925,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99997795},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2896173369","doi":"10.1080/14729342.2018.1530862","title":"Exclusive rights of patent owners versus rights of chattel owners: the implied licence approach","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Oxford University Commonwealth Law Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Victoria University","keywords":"Scope (computer science); Law; Patent law; Business; Common law; Law and economics; Exclusive right; Political science; Intellectual property; Economics","score_opus":0.049150318670832915,"score_gpt":0.2853740135228697,"score_spread":0.23622369485203676,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2896173369","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.39990237,0.000068398425,0.0012092444,0.0022900908,0.0010974255,0.00037711594,0.00001989258,0.000037661797,0.5949978],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99828863,0.0002344053,0.0005188749,0.000068981986,0.00038159417,2.7228296e-7,0.0000034362467,0.000005665562,0.00049815077],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981118,0.00037551523,0.00031777238,0.00018542467,0.000594372,0.00041514324],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99822044,0.00019281212,0.0006707244,0.00027598397,0.00037825605,0.00026179553],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00078062655,0.00014330515,0.00028272232,0.00012039261,0.0035054039,0.000044066837,0.0007834799,0.00013147436,0.00016804902],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000012643064,0.00009909314,0.00017372271,0.00040653214,0.0014590798,0.0003885226,0.0001130475,0.0003558794,0.0000025110603],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0017935068,0.00037618546,0.00101753,0.00002757248,0.0002449086,0.00002083271,0.059409976,0.000035950165,0.00013717507,0.9299997,0.0013667289,0.0055699],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0024449367,0.00070334494,0.0020822955,0.00007444715,0.00013696255,0.00001347876,0.030461367,0.00014992851,0.00043306628,0.002503057,0.9607542,0.00024287758],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012078142,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017421598,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9593875,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021604003,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00020215478,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9977919},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2897993594","doi":"10.1017/cem.2018.433","title":"WWGD (What would Gwyneth do?)","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"Canadian Journal of Emergency Medicine","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Credit Valley Hospital","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Content (measure theory); Action (physics); World Wide Web; Internet privacy; Advertising; Computer science; Business","score_opus":0.12329027816501137,"score_gpt":0.37951744345959754,"score_spread":0.25622716529458617,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2897993594","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00051472615,0.0141048515,0.000026491527,0.84644985,0.06796754,0.00015877892,0.0000121088,0.000010512402,0.07075515],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0043476843,0.04184624,0.000059903017,0.48236927,0.37077314,0.0000072887015,0.00007249021,0.00013697629,0.10038701],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967579,0.0002578834,0.0009881188,0.00024028565,0.0009926108,0.0007632057],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966131,0.000076068216,0.00083071616,0.0003003319,0.0010865802,0.0010932302],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017402418,0.00027712222,0.000576979,0.0007065948,0.0006112108,0.000062493644,0.00079548225,0.0012435707,0.056755923],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00075775484,0.00023280029,0.00025989284,0.0005239333,0.0006485446,0.00044659886,0.000010477521,0.0026150383,0.00008797177],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000034517723,0.0000025140478,0.00026404788,0.000022876768,0.0000776861,0.00035778567,0.009691085,1.7160811e-7,0.0000026408482,0.00017278898,0.98499924,0.004405695],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002008265,0.00027899226,0.00016912843,0.0006349578,0.00016393237,0.000011607929,0.0022445635,5.0098055e-7,8.1813204e-7,0.0011537261,0.99491113,0.00022983622],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07222032,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15512873,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.36408055,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00040928702,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031404796,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99968594},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2898442080","doi":"","title":"A Comparative Analysis of Canadian and American Law Relating to the Preservation of the Confidentiality of Settlement and Mediation Discussions","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Settlement (finance); Law; Confidentiality; Mediation; Political science; Sociology; Criminology; Business","score_opus":0.03822904667678589,"score_gpt":0.3379862577107253,"score_spread":0.29975721103393943,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2898442080","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9677638,0.000008956437,0.00011811157,0.012567141,0.000019286641,0.00019173378,0.000032220072,0.000001814632,0.019296981],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99966085,0.000028568005,0.000040995423,0.00007363441,0.000009604286,0.0000032298244,0.000003865749,5.6598697e-7,0.0001787003],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994088,0.00014404615,0.00015884699,0.00005753478,0.00017467422,0.000056091903],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995386,0.000099556026,0.00014840244,0.0000777568,0.00009105418,0.000044653018],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004711277,0.000025528367,0.00010856992,0.00008521674,0.00021456146,0.000010184264,0.000054132866,0.000012274986,0.000050546518],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000049968232,0.000013911236,0.00002514047,0.000962758,0.00023620672,0.00006718779,0.00002086919,0.000023074092,4.3920696e-8],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013590335,0.000025264735,0.6225468,0.0000047554813,0.00025464216,2.992951e-8,0.19586137,0.000436448,0.0009065231,0.17684685,0.00029715506,0.0028065976],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000049803657,0.000020568461,0.95585805,0.0000058641385,0.00012104655,1.769295e-8,0.027046079,0.0010963475,0.00012602648,0.00014941973,0.015502826,0.000023949542],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8563514,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9831007,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.33331126,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000016725298,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004054924,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1650255},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2899773232","doi":"10.1017/s0069005800008183","title":"Canadian Cases in Private International Law in 2001-2 / Jurisprudence canadienne en matière de droit international privé en 2001-2","year":2003,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Yearbook of international Law/Annuaire canadien de droit international","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Political science; Law; Conflict of laws; Content (measure theory); Library science; Computer science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.009502899293501874,"score_gpt":0.25357983183335553,"score_spread":0.24407693253985366,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2899773232","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2028031,0.00037233668,0.00006799448,0.038896333,0.011038619,0.0007600158,0.0036790401,0.00004702514,0.7423355],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9100009,0.00080808,0.0012524135,0.0041011553,0.001833682,0.00014531735,0.0006032629,0.00011475273,0.08114042],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99260867,0.00052501075,0.0016701946,0.0011713038,0.0013972439,0.0026275923],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9946734,0.00052828086,0.0005454153,0.00053429685,0.00105796,0.002660705],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030771452,0.0006989266,0.000702532,0.002497313,0.00033096716,0.00040650152,0.0032739823,0.000901657,0.012916158],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017074862,0.0010392861,0.00034893106,0.00078395574,0.00082538236,0.0015598313,0.00015590356,0.00127734,0.00019282145],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000072470786,0.00018957767,0.05706919,0.000030887066,0.00044403528,0.00278232,0.0068511786,0.0009104541,0.00006225687,0.92247134,0.006491303,0.0026249536],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013747355,0.00009925151,0.023550995,0.0008324032,0.00004928204,0.0006546049,0.001785321,0.0029745551,0.000119666394,0.022679023,0.9449179,0.00096224225],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99235225,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9997271,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9384266,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.061066136,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009850566,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99920577},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2900635075","doi":"","title":"Art 6:102: Implied Terms","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Compromise; Scope (computer science); Political science; Law and economics; Process (computing); Exegesis; Law; Substantive law; Business; Sociology; Computer science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.014957104384269695,"score_gpt":0.3130728842547334,"score_spread":0.2981157798704637,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2900635075","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3477084,0.00054351694,0.0016087473,0.021246763,0.0014531241,0.00018204187,0.0000015048431,0.00008738825,0.6271685],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.964458,0.0034445066,0.000014617331,0.0000959004,0.0013136162,0.0000021318608,6.5081167e-7,0.000009410757,0.03066116],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977224,0.0000569567,0.00014847584,0.00012288208,0.00030997992,0.0016392951],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99938625,0.000018998835,0.00019946613,0.0002223774,0.00005501477,0.00011787789],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021332083,0.00007963419,0.000108678556,0.000045539357,0.0029989644,0.00043388543,0.0004863408,0.000078951336,0.00018364753],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011602544,0.00007138021,0.00010156025,0.00003342198,0.00015933781,0.0003980097,0.000035713027,0.0008691971,0.00016892326],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002362566,0.00003056961,0.006438847,8.1873617e-7,0.000054010092,0.000004239002,0.0013195947,5.0350513e-7,0.00024509872,0.85926247,0.0010587925,0.13156143],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00045180754,0.000110478824,0.012818793,0.000010450934,0.000021763602,0.000062689374,0.0016365359,0.000005275843,0.000030321165,0.28938437,0.6953187,0.00014880086],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005988438,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013740381,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.69425994,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005270637,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00142184,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998299},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2903296248","doi":"","title":"SOLICITOR-CLIENT PRIVILEGE AND THE CONFLICT OF LAWS","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Privilege (computing); Conflict of laws; Law; Supreme court; Context (archaeology); Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.04445663548282397,"score_gpt":0.31964159329450864,"score_spread":0.27518495781168467,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2903296248","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.022636179,0.40835613,0.0000046547084,0.18922427,0.0008443787,0.0020967894,0.000026332014,0.000028048233,0.37678322],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8855859,0.106285796,0.0000067316637,0.0060562873,0.00044763,0.000026591537,0.0000013463831,0.000006727363,0.0015830066],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99907625,0.00029095562,0.00015546543,0.000058264108,0.00016535512,0.00025368447],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999337,0.000109692315,0.00007801992,0.00019698012,0.00004483033,0.0002334419],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022872917,0.00005841755,0.00017070063,0.000016290142,0.00051016593,0.000023494804,0.00019336172,0.000033112054,0.00037091266],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013919115,0.000031439107,0.00006134689,0.00011742184,0.0004973462,0.00006380637,0.000017972245,0.000081272934,0.000039539384],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000027709318,0.000006194515,0.0012878967,0.0001436679,0.000022858025,3.0265986e-7,0.012490027,6.956411e-8,0.0000022364218,0.9383932,0.017694581,0.029956214],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008662137,0.0000042488305,0.003296545,0.00019691247,0.000047387097,0.0000015754999,0.0001296094,0.0000014544415,0.000001851886,0.00010352339,0.99608755,0.00004272262],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3323975,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5457561,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97839296,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000625947,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019899858,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.67204815},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2904474592","doi":"10.4324/9781315591520-8","title":"Two jurisdictions in dispute about canonical appeals","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Non canonical; Law and economics; Law; Business; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.03640043004196601,"score_gpt":0.35235740935834603,"score_spread":0.31595697931638,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2904474592","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000056604065,0.00037462928,0.00005103535,0.002818269,0.0010926679,0.00034130184,0.000043535274,0.00012677746,0.9950952],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.02090343,0.002258065,0.00006990764,0.00017610981,0.0019556978,0.000017049217,0.000026846428,0.000031618576,0.9745613],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983283,0.000037941732,0.0003743112,0.00040055843,0.00048214814,0.00037668794],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99891603,0.00008395866,0.00022199798,0.00048056597,0.00008630559,0.00021116038],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00058585394,0.00022550396,0.00037190368,0.00016652621,0.000856891,0.00021198066,0.0004313223,0.00044461092,0.0025389146],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004215172,0.00022368318,0.00021038555,0.00001946765,0.00046454612,0.00018713145,0.00009700174,0.0004843051,0.00040609448],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000061045553,0.000016745773,0.0001690992,0.000004828815,0.000024416617,0.000019510304,0.0013894967,0.0000011005054,0.0000015850992,0.97370607,0.0035844787,0.021076566],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023734356,0.000018464474,0.0014641994,0.00012395895,0.000031390355,0.0000011970483,0.0000377281,0.000006373909,5.6276735e-7,0.014232838,0.98358864,0.0002573287],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024887357,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.24982554,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98000413,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025358942,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006617026,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9983729},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2904852339","doi":"10.3968/10687","title":"Reflection and Improvement of Litigation Relief in China's Administrative Contract Dispute Resolution","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian social science","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Vagueness; Scope (computer science); Interpretation (philosophy); Dispute resolution; Administrative law; Judicial interpretation; Law and economics; Law; Business; Ambiguity; Political science; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.021876337412117083,"score_gpt":0.3365631970575533,"score_spread":0.3146868596454362,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2904852339","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8147964,0.000016035116,0.000041852487,0.002125857,0.00025840726,0.00020040017,0.00000922952,0.000010753737,0.18254107],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994153,0.000022519906,0.00003627936,0.00009795183,0.0002704684,0.0000060916677,0.0000014327892,0.0000021510007,0.00014781229],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99906915,0.000043887823,0.00014556397,0.0001854247,0.00026604137,0.00028992153],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994957,0.000015515921,0.00008550553,0.000050323775,0.00015818226,0.00019481564],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010667413,0.00004870048,0.00007511591,0.00014928526,0.0010144088,0.00006802867,0.0001015734,0.00006618648,0.000033843946],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016276432,0.000054193522,0.000015553105,0.0007196429,0.0015262979,0.00036031663,0.000010748913,0.000067740795,0.0000016009466],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000058556918,0.000062129126,0.04268879,0.000012604007,0.0000075036432,0.0000044304234,0.15681906,3.828886e-7,0.03307785,0.5573007,0.00038875552,0.20957924],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039085248,0.00048219445,0.91016483,0.000044253717,0.000008949177,6.8915136e-7,0.009425931,0.0002221055,0.0030435415,0.0041013192,0.07189609,0.00021926944],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.27460253,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.64892656,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.867476,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00064048334,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010583464,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.78021145},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2906321805","doi":"","title":"Force majeure clauses in comparative perspective: the Canadian common law approach in light of recent developments in the courts of Singapore and the United Kingdom","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Adelaide Research & Scholarship (AR&S) (University of Adelaide)","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Force majeure; Perspective (graphical); Law; Political science; Kingdom; Common law; Comparative law","score_opus":0.1742650682525985,"score_gpt":0.39322314210665293,"score_spread":0.21895807385405444,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2906321805","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9412317,0.00024744094,0.000011288873,0.018488552,0.000023202141,0.00090835086,0.000009243762,0.0000060338907,0.039074164],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992554,0.00037217978,0.00010722708,0.00013088383,0.0000151582535,0.0000032798337,0.000008572436,0.0000071492577,0.00010012857],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99352914,0.004263244,0.0003165235,0.0002967386,0.0010839598,0.0005103773],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99722075,0.0015037246,0.00020229508,0.0003301755,0.00060781545,0.00013522152],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01141399,0.00013732938,0.0003764795,0.0006692905,0.0010890721,0.00007826577,0.0010429478,0.00019078715,0.000027224254],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00044312622,0.00010109708,0.000063203726,0.0018307589,0.0023180835,0.0005111772,0.0001778847,0.0013541527,0.000001427505],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00045561662,0.00016163466,0.06384603,0.00003554018,0.00004579267,0.000013935644,0.22900155,0.00014618736,0.00006753219,0.70561326,0.00012710181,0.00048583566],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0041201166,0.00021582338,0.545239,0.00045804156,0.000041343577,0.0000061686383,0.36434376,0.00077069004,0.00013343316,0.029004114,0.055367026,0.00030051215],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.64087236,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.90038604,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.67660916,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00053546653,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000612529,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8541075},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2909133158","doi":"10.7202/1055257ar","title":"Le choix de la loi applicable à la succession limité par les mesures de protection familiale en droit international privé québécois","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.005987839826960482,"score_gpt":0.25610275911139274,"score_spread":0.25011491928443225,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2909133158","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90716225,0.00063832017,0.016639842,0.004498143,0.00063954224,0.0005781054,0.0000254221,0.0001486547,0.06966974],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9648723,0.0014345645,0.0007792703,0.00024679195,0.0008545908,0.00011613398,0.000015452213,0.000043360335,0.031637512],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974317,0.0006946792,0.00032725907,0.00045768105,0.00048466027,0.00060402055],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99881446,0.0004042466,0.0002239822,0.00023980883,0.000090143374,0.0002273566],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019098781,0.00023619138,0.00027575274,0.00013302898,0.0006854428,0.00025636866,0.0004626296,0.0009992158,0.0002771449],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019721084,0.00028643437,0.0002105919,0.00031591934,0.0007938172,0.00041973544,0.00007490679,0.00087477674,0.00007700073],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025368252,0.00049060537,0.10261865,0.00023503254,0.00024041075,0.000037371174,0.03985996,0.0016398033,0.022612637,0.4577487,0.0010454543,0.3732177],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008343801,0.00011627413,0.08897691,0.00020170402,0.000073526426,0.000043657798,0.0043581836,0.00384526,0.0028532713,0.024356801,0.87392473,0.00041530898],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2086968,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.030537277,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87287927,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017704569,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00083047786,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99995875},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2910617774","doi":"","title":"Three's Company - How American Law Can Recognize a Third Social Parent in Same-Sex Headed Families","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hastings women's law journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Sociology; Political science; Genealogy; Psychology; History","score_opus":0.04696890691286071,"score_gpt":0.28544455105574595,"score_spread":0.23847564414288525,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2910617774","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9474234,0.00004822747,0.000118619915,0.010984319,0.0004638296,0.0001864155,0.0000122266565,0.00011150152,0.04065147],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99653864,0.00015288295,0.0003137884,0.0012278002,0.0013610541,0.000023279767,0.0000029535759,0.00002472052,0.00035485596],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972236,0.00024130597,0.00043993376,0.000301617,0.00083185855,0.0009616809],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99873126,0.00016033309,0.00045131912,0.00010736963,0.00018062674,0.0003690876],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010764536,0.00023704549,0.00050737674,0.00012803887,0.0034914098,0.00033026835,0.00033076902,0.000106793814,0.00015002304],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010377232,0.00023261429,0.00015027066,0.0005199589,0.0015317108,0.00035015558,0.00006030589,0.00071173377,0.000011606818],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00048597966,0.000892101,0.0774048,0.000043297412,0.00024968997,0.0005718367,0.70250446,0.0000390228,0.0012175502,0.113234736,0.0062405006,0.09711603],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003387735,0.000736114,0.07260618,0.0001924456,0.000045970373,0.0002845021,0.24942984,0.00012735973,0.00011853065,0.010734495,0.6611128,0.0012240411],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.040830106,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1521915,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6548723,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006249716,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026251233,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9978059},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2915360265","doi":"","title":"L’Enrichissement Injustifié, L’Union De Fait Et L’Emprunt À La Common Law Dans Le Droit Mixte du Québec (Unjust Enrichment, Cohabitation, and Borrowing from the Common Law in the Mixed Jurisdiction of Quebec)","year":2018,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Common law; Law; Appeal; Cohabitation; Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.007428972992978004,"score_gpt":0.2579409945712888,"score_spread":0.25051202157831076,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2915360265","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91352177,0.008948347,0.0032822446,0.06465168,0.00074352307,0.00038451515,0.00001840603,0.000023857514,0.008425677],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9912788,0.006130309,0.00002906151,0.0010171842,0.0009133136,0.000017144695,0.000017571441,0.00002548579,0.00057111774],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99427104,0.0029451973,0.0006800508,0.00028624432,0.0005898436,0.0012276464],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982946,0.0006560959,0.00052522036,0.00026443778,0.00015679831,0.000102829006],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009427976,0.00025706217,0.00032601057,0.00006345244,0.001835566,0.00027109816,0.00053511595,0.00020724835,0.00003012149],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003891523,0.00020473171,0.00014596956,0.00045470623,0.0013761184,0.00072923064,0.000080943144,0.0015989515,0.000006082179],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008115596,0.0003113502,0.0142223425,0.000010753032,0.00013943318,0.0000024953306,0.07108795,0.000029546216,0.00068495015,0.899341,0.00057110103,0.013517942],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0024480254,0.001321295,0.19144495,0.00043987783,0.0005780671,0.00019172323,0.1327583,0.00084293506,0.0004269985,0.45241094,0.21657541,0.000561489],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.86252195,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9899756,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.44693005,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018577288,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023081687,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994639},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2920080742","doi":"","title":"Of Irregular Votes and Robocalls: Resolving Disputed Elections in Canada and New Zealand","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Lawmaking; Political science; Democracy; Constitutionalism; Order (exchange); Law and economics; Jurisdiction; Law; Politics; Sociology; Economics; Legislature","score_opus":0.0099578981029491,"score_gpt":0.2462043766314103,"score_spread":0.2362464785284612,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2920080742","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9910565,0.0057387836,0.00027988153,0.002342414,0.0001211024,0.000058732305,6.171185e-7,0.0000055634337,0.0003964197],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9940484,0.0047209933,0.00003245221,0.000020925725,0.00021704915,6.2206044e-7,4.160853e-7,0.0000049322007,0.00095417554],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985726,0.00007957161,0.00015924787,0.000071014074,0.00017518643,0.0009424198],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996441,0.00006106959,0.00007838576,0.000039793078,0.000028636881,0.00014803074],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009568866,0.000058588856,0.000108469474,0.000066688604,0.00021891693,0.000026289188,0.00005569621,0.000038863098,0.000012598875],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006679194,0.000055610315,0.000016788928,0.00016721697,0.00004645906,0.00021712863,0.000013533222,0.00042597615,1.1653495e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003177058,0.00003297392,0.833485,0.0000043051086,0.000060608665,0.0000010831001,0.005838356,0.000012760785,0.00048781384,0.09304108,0.000322843,0.066681385],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013219151,0.00020818242,0.846062,0.00007573389,0.00007336203,0.00018348363,0.013005371,0.00015078294,0.000118922144,0.048331015,0.090127826,0.00034138694],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.93393254,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99680257,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.089804985,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006929541,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004097501,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.72687906},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2921280898","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v35i0.5692","title":"George M. Duck Lecture","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"George (robot); Windsor; Art; Humanities; Library science; Art history; Biology; Computer science; Ecology","score_opus":0.04109636855055323,"score_gpt":0.3630343156885368,"score_spread":0.32193794713798357,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2921280898","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.39678064,0.00011256979,0.0012561281,0.0073569347,0.0016008945,0.00046737777,0.0000106874295,0.00014000498,0.5922748],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9898443,0.000030121959,0.0003747277,0.0012139935,0.0024245975,0.000007317063,0.0000012929847,0.000014309107,0.0060893036],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988976,0.00005912462,0.00017791144,0.00020726187,0.00037423486,0.0002838688],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992001,0.00007852903,0.000085451546,0.00021497534,0.00026173244,0.00015922774],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00037014947,0.00009001288,0.00014202848,0.000106488325,0.0003196985,0.000113001304,0.0004719698,0.000102240476,0.0016565737],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00027205306,0.00008931507,0.00005099022,0.00036919845,0.0002213773,0.0003105272,0.00010517305,0.000093054274,0.00026935156],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012605633,0.0009998572,0.035331737,0.00063727965,0.0003812954,0.000046209567,0.22979453,0.00020490453,0.030440837,0.17744882,0.28381577,0.2396382],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020021145,0.00013228663,0.025401574,0.000048908158,0.000102863996,6.3257517e-7,0.00067083945,0.000025861253,0.0026982566,0.00052493135,0.970017,0.00017660749],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025560835,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017897697,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6862013,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000041499155,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014112872,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992561},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2922088468","doi":"","title":"EQUUSTEK V GOOGLE: LA RHÉTORIQUE DE LA VIRTUALITÉ EN DROIT INTERNATIONAL PRIVÉ","year":2016,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cyberspace; Rhetoric; Internationalism (politics); Political science; Virtuality (gaming); Sociology; Law; Globalization; Law and economics; Politics; The Internet","score_opus":0.008815120384069716,"score_gpt":0.31168137675624,"score_spread":0.3028662563721703,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2922088468","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.066452675,0.00031004948,0.014924661,0.055001024,0.0027958686,0.00013363535,0.000027552232,0.000121236866,0.8602333],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.64202344,0.001437987,0.00040507506,0.00035081242,0.0015642362,0.000010591119,0.0000016691192,0.000012638007,0.35419357],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980838,0.0007026292,0.0002459719,0.00024779595,0.00038959013,0.00033024128],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99824303,0.0012523324,0.00009230517,0.00013963023,0.00009022782,0.00018248499],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017893316,0.00013017695,0.0001322003,0.000054983408,0.00015371651,0.00014088584,0.00034305113,0.00034798033,0.006814756],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003149707,0.00010657487,0.000113562586,0.00014655209,0.000516289,0.0004405826,0.00009284102,0.0001552101,0.0004323652],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000123383425,0.00009069428,0.0037205808,0.0000049669693,0.00004364391,0.000012092237,0.005735127,7.735829e-7,0.00094094925,0.8217558,0.005213099,0.16246988],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004021088,0.0000472457,0.006299624,0.00008813111,0.000017595079,0.00001524808,0.00073687086,0.000052914147,0.0003170084,0.019056039,0.9727965,0.00017069325],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024273267,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010531433,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9675834,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00049440935,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026879288,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9940932},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2922195051","doi":"10.7202/1056952ar","title":"L’harmonisation internationale du droit privé","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.016963281105763568,"score_gpt":0.24994851711951757,"score_spread":0.232985236013754,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2922195051","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7268757,0.0008306152,0.00067435636,0.016786864,0.003005982,0.00038268368,0.00002420659,0.000083269224,0.2513363],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.83419263,0.0018170924,0.00026466485,0.0004029289,0.0021830883,0.00001856667,0.000037727008,0.000026799418,0.16105647],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982905,0.000121607896,0.0003566799,0.00038013334,0.00037779595,0.00047327596],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99902743,0.00014238807,0.00022981476,0.0002690955,0.00014530882,0.00018599161],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00069087115,0.00013455065,0.00024234934,0.0000982951,0.00022157237,0.00014681039,0.0003406007,0.00025578123,0.0042570094],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008457779,0.00023609692,0.00020703212,0.00034573922,0.0001657505,0.0005452976,0.00006641882,0.0002583254,0.0031629577],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031218653,0.00024135843,0.07346921,0.00017805124,0.00008918011,0.000027506398,0.011083399,0.00026842655,0.000949128,0.83738124,0.0020822724,0.07419901],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006913623,0.00014461759,0.0596394,0.00034558555,0.00008146907,0.00005027231,0.0008355227,0.008920611,0.00029472,0.066190906,0.8623667,0.0004388503],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015842202,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00050564006,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8602844,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009278934,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016614908,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9976132},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2943331549","doi":"","title":"The Utility of Citizenship Stripping Laws in the Uk, Canada and Australia","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Melbourne University law review","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Citizenship; Law; Stripping (fiber); Political science; Project commissioning; Publishing; Engineering; Politics","score_opus":0.06806905477514832,"score_gpt":0.3142376083634411,"score_spread":0.2461685535882928,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2943331549","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6569194,0.010981491,0.000006019621,0.04159034,0.00040756434,0.0009416702,0.00003543825,0.000013503958,0.28910458],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98398,0.014816279,0.00000423521,0.00017162912,0.000027495269,2.0681667e-7,5.4999936e-7,9.905492e-7,0.000998635],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991414,0.00030344762,0.000105756975,0.00008888864,0.00021490126,0.00014561317],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993491,0.0001445711,0.00014316046,0.00026408472,0.0000556735,0.00004336979],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001600452,0.000049494833,0.0001338529,0.0000061730257,0.0016866106,0.000056882644,0.00045561034,0.000027866245,0.00008388327],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014140487,0.00003395059,0.000038461763,0.00006530013,0.0004207424,0.000073771975,0.000044366512,0.00011321115,5.641369e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001777231,0.000017636803,0.05379735,0.00037151334,0.000037010454,0.000045113797,0.0023745839,9.7113855e-8,0.0000033529764,0.9092385,0.015348335,0.0187487],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009549762,0.0000053115023,0.113864064,0.0003185085,0.000028208631,7.5569505e-7,0.0006881819,9.77945e-7,0.000002230443,0.00039032593,0.8845609,0.000045034365],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.91534525,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9895931,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9088482,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000051055886,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016090104,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99961305},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2943774203","doi":"10.1017/s0020782900006914","title":"SupremeCourt of Canada: Mugesera v.Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration)","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Legal Materials","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Citizenship; Immigration; Political science; Law; Content (measure theory); Politics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.009112330724101208,"score_gpt":0.25057192659917027,"score_spread":0.24145959587506907,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2943774203","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9534734,0.000021238196,0.0000071331,0.013930169,0.00087756413,0.00006735415,0.00016398306,0.000005114024,0.031454034],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962646,0.000018019758,0.000092894814,0.00026218634,0.00039155522,0.000003369546,0.0000131337365,0.000003943555,0.0029503005],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99905205,0.00004524727,0.00028884012,0.00008907901,0.00042399231,0.00010078631],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999504,0.000060961163,0.00014380386,0.000056481123,0.00018932253,0.000045389676],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002639422,0.0000547245,0.00012226329,0.000029854942,0.00006489531,0.000036861635,0.00012379297,0.000030406401,0.0012853593],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000076857104,0.000054956916,0.000014904081,0.000030122737,0.0000651904,0.00011788533,0.000023963465,0.000023097171,6.289212e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00043499234,0.00011878285,0.013938233,0.00010261898,0.0003635305,0.000022486412,0.005989331,0.000051725547,0.2914076,0.58403355,0.09759658,0.00594058],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035062243,0.000027875312,0.04343184,0.00004270931,0.000015259848,0.000004004725,0.0005640276,0.000013868577,0.16199924,0.00054369104,0.79286313,0.00014370674],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9728421,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99418026,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.69526654,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001354676,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00083795853,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996276},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2945387792","doi":"","title":"7.4 Families and Property Rights in Canada","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Property (philosophy); Property rights; Law and economics; Political science; Business; Law; Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.010894122088965686,"score_gpt":0.23015198633982117,"score_spread":0.2192578642508555,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2945387792","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.69075894,0.000014102362,0.0000062351673,0.0051801032,0.000075005206,0.000047940983,6.1269986e-7,0.000009774262,0.30390728],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9855911,0.00006539736,0.000012585709,0.000088722285,0.000030601015,0.0000019425238,4.1273637e-8,6.273766e-7,0.014208941],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997014,0.000019688207,0.000043938366,0.000058186008,0.00008896414,0.000087856475],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998897,0.000027336719,0.0000068337513,0.00002843739,0.000011909943,0.000035794284],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00008089551,0.00002126306,0.000033215474,0.000012493888,0.00008806812,0.000008452109,0.00002842978,0.000012321165,0.00023645294],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000010991963,0.000008954612,0.0000035317264,0.000038329577,0.00004224606,0.00007420574,0.0000071861555,0.0000111742975,0.0000032011235],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010656902,0.000018242898,0.42755178,0.000003974834,0.0000061587975,0.000012042456,0.007095124,1.2623721e-7,0.0005418176,0.18459299,0.009511088,0.370656],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000094902454,0.0000036274937,0.063971706,0.000006776881,4.898437e-7,1.09638925e-7,0.00054194906,0.000002250725,0.00008399993,0.00062407163,0.934635,0.00003512457],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.998962,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999027,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92512393,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000108708795,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00029730232,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2588994},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2946065467","doi":"10.15168/11572_368650","title":"Marital status discrimination in the allocation of rights, obligations, and benefits: Legal paths to protect non-normative families","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"Institutional Research Information System (Università degli Studi di Trento)","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Argument (complex analysis); Political science; European union; Convention; Human rights; Family law; Law; Law and economics; Sociology; Business; International trade","score_opus":0.04203468787288808,"score_gpt":0.3361627486649549,"score_spread":0.29412806079206677,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2946065467","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7696851,0.00020240538,0.00063272595,0.0008595048,0.0007009865,0.004516048,0.00043434772,0.00005272046,0.22291616],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99730897,0.00022423877,0.000053884774,0.000015499581,0.000076847195,0.00021478932,0.0014520477,0.000006425303,0.00064727047],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9956322,0.0004922291,0.0006465328,0.00026362954,0.0025139314,0.0004515287],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971038,0.00028614065,0.00040929022,0.00023836749,0.0018238241,0.00013856833],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024727632,0.00022612418,0.0003234337,0.0018243465,0.0018079478,0.00034758064,0.00043880317,0.00026266318,0.00001702966],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00031328996,0.00019917908,0.00009105715,0.0017501889,0.0002870838,0.0035560061,0.00009236058,0.00046448247,0.00006345535],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00031544192,0.00010824067,0.002102255,0.0007517495,0.00008956237,0.0000039817087,0.29444572,0.00070250314,0.00001047536,0.6776064,0.00046820752,0.023395479],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011068953,0.00024946313,0.27595827,0.0013367407,0.000052124502,0.0000031506888,0.6675049,0.0009947738,0.000033285374,0.0001540231,0.052280556,0.00032579456],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02832202,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016972115,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6774524,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013581858,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012761133,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994916},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2946429698","doi":"","title":"LE DROIT CANADIEN DES BREVETS EN CAPSULE – PARTIE II","year":2009,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Patentability; Scope (computer science); Political science; Patent law; Law; Normative; State (computer science); Law and economics; Sociology; Intellectual property; Computer science","score_opus":0.022762561645108533,"score_gpt":0.2748898762452553,"score_spread":0.25212731460014676,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2946429698","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006656081,0.3917681,0.0000020528153,0.381774,0.0005732899,0.0005861917,0.00005554685,0.00002365212,0.21856107],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.69556224,0.21250747,0.000030631494,0.02056793,0.0007922539,0.000021369331,0.000014870298,0.000020547892,0.070482686],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978676,0.0004564945,0.00032421763,0.00025376742,0.00025083235,0.0008471051],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983795,0.000035025838,0.00010443922,0.00039982042,0.00010682774,0.0009743751],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015644517,0.00018605369,0.00034627612,0.000044856763,0.0025242001,0.00007912399,0.00052222627,0.00013620273,0.0021930058],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015711963,0.00017129538,0.00017057819,0.0005267317,0.0004896428,0.000214234,0.000021338405,0.0002511905,0.00039956108],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[5.8891305e-7,0.000016929804,0.000033050215,0.00017825654,0.000025000707,0.000032223947,0.005058065,0.000001884301,0.000002188894,0.5438092,0.05134135,0.39950132],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000074284355,0.000085436535,0.0030352024,0.0016179212,0.00012675532,0.000028048562,0.00013483758,0.000008252824,0.0000031345876,0.007924629,0.9867473,0.00021416172],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9626542,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9963375,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93540597,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012311,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003393651,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99877435},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2946962158","doi":"","title":"RE-ARRANGING THE ARRANGEMENT LANDSCAPE: THE IMPLICATIONS OF RE MAGNA INTERNATIONAL INC","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Test (biology); Law; Variety (cybernetics); Balancing test; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.07158653283137478,"score_gpt":0.31340565440114715,"score_spread":0.24181912156977237,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2946962158","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0008232337,0.020384219,0.000014867358,0.43098068,0.0002956492,0.0007169555,0.000029931378,0.000015333613,0.54673916],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95919085,0.03056643,0.000018820607,0.008331363,0.0002464393,0.00007602132,0.000008690502,0.0000074286313,0.0015539874],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99928415,0.0001546797,0.00016204185,0.000077444514,0.00016915247,0.00015251459],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993656,0.00005822497,0.000092017035,0.00031468924,0.00009608021,0.00007333272],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001365429,0.000051987463,0.00008119953,0.000023641585,0.0007503239,0.000030218185,0.0006140347,0.00002187361,0.0031881714],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000082229104,0.00002620008,0.00006510471,0.00018633406,0.0001561974,0.000047505113,0.000023935205,0.00009203104,0.000055424214],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000040311797,0.000019865181,0.0049937707,0.00011233037,0.00011290311,0.000001486185,0.04797572,0.0000011550623,0.00000675302,0.56450105,0.19240755,0.18986338],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026974622,0.0000040962536,0.01154292,0.00014545195,0.00004155534,5.7615165e-7,0.0011861692,0.0000030885124,0.0000011954049,0.00078052783,0.9862308,0.000036664045],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.16437975,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7340671,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9583676,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008174237,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022636037,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99772304},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2947277614","doi":"10.7202/1059392ar","title":"LA LOI 89 ET LE DROIT INTERNATIONAL PRIVÉ","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.012543122355005414,"score_gpt":0.269172592454876,"score_spread":0.2566294700998706,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2947277614","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.44061634,0.0006650973,0.00035328677,0.024454301,0.0026160604,0.0002276348,0.000037745187,0.00007060868,0.5309589],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87327266,0.0013415635,0.00031267185,0.00055141724,0.00111463,0.000012230571,0.000036105477,0.000027189884,0.12333156],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99835914,0.00020421024,0.00029751853,0.00036214222,0.00033974164,0.00043724017],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99911475,0.00017246752,0.00017154495,0.00026752148,0.0000977995,0.00017594062],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009892709,0.00012739883,0.00023844306,0.00008589252,0.00014239943,0.00017638817,0.00044052707,0.0003145728,0.0024817754],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007565608,0.00021769939,0.0002113035,0.000270066,0.00021390014,0.00051140634,0.000097236654,0.00038183256,0.0015388805],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021024822,0.00021382337,0.013415216,0.00008008016,0.00007183662,0.00003844524,0.0059699886,0.0000975882,0.00032213496,0.9204035,0.0014849796,0.057881393],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005683766,0.00006671281,0.019831877,0.00024934608,0.00003244698,0.000056746052,0.00095462304,0.0013052342,0.00007692786,0.039171696,0.93740624,0.00027978048],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002541407,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013214546,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93592125,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00044704616,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000329693,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99923855},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2947697804","doi":"10.7202/1059343ar","title":"HOW HYBRID IS SAINT LUCIAN LAW?","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; SAINT; Code (set theory); English law; Civil law (Civil law); History; Sociology; Political science; Art history; Computer science; Commercial law; Programming language","score_opus":0.01268402080624465,"score_gpt":0.2459202118506119,"score_spread":0.23323619104436724,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2947697804","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.67325824,0.00010983653,0.000097201555,0.01288121,0.0004277517,0.00023890071,0.000012224542,0.00010342014,0.3128712],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9541943,0.0001271207,0.000115904346,0.0010863222,0.0006804802,0.000008529148,0.0000058284427,0.000013838098,0.043767665],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990252,0.000053472308,0.00011250785,0.0002302686,0.00021198783,0.00036655957],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994423,0.000038297847,0.00006787369,0.0002519558,0.000054475655,0.00014510717],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00035690854,0.00006869266,0.00015505923,0.000041264346,0.00022603449,0.00018508972,0.00020976788,0.000081424056,0.0005505759],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000028734006,0.000102542595,0.000120922436,0.00012790092,0.00008180911,0.00022533457,0.000030131441,0.00013039805,0.0004488906],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002042234,0.00007798867,0.016304974,0.00007323985,0.000042615517,0.000045106248,0.014392979,0.0000067664346,0.0013250377,0.9187131,0.004801489,0.04419631],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019595053,0.000043776712,0.0027385827,0.000044516182,0.000014711336,0.000008230552,0.0009575348,0.00012688605,0.00066838146,0.017637877,0.97738045,0.00018308515],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003537993,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013872882,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.972579,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030591997,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006446219,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.602842},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2947788385","doi":"","title":"L'EFFICACITE EN DROIT QUEBECOIS D'UNE CONVENTION D'ARBITRAGE OU D'ELECTION DE FOR INVOQUEE A L'ENCONTRE D'UN APPEL EN GARANTIE","year":2004,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law; Arbitration; Convention; Appeal; Supreme court; Jurisdiction; Jurisprudence","score_opus":0.015452921952930805,"score_gpt":0.28063631076907675,"score_spread":0.26518338881614595,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2947788385","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005988066,0.44837555,0.006089894,0.51170945,0.0028982381,0.005403809,0.00021751453,0.00013702316,0.019180426],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4221571,0.50690275,0.0007831837,0.024425475,0.0037079158,0.0006244307,0.00017462218,0.00015454194,0.041069947],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99722695,0.0006835396,0.0005415395,0.00038963385,0.00029622612,0.0008621255],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984473,0.00016423398,0.00024641206,0.00035777688,0.00021783085,0.00056644704],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002931875,0.00028642005,0.00049356057,0.000106366504,0.0011693165,0.00014310161,0.00042922702,0.00032142684,0.0007078569],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00037675037,0.00027384853,0.00046842883,0.0007458636,0.00028580005,0.0002859507,0.000017190996,0.00043804158,0.00026900938],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019823698,0.00007877634,0.000064104155,0.0017528863,0.00022133657,0.000018266242,0.008181375,0.000042804397,0.00003740694,0.4335129,0.013434223,0.5426361],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005864754,0.00009859497,0.0011424837,0.003019732,0.0005850347,0.00002772271,0.00021873177,0.0000723989,0.000041933592,0.015015482,0.97887176,0.00031967048],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7663517,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.95154166,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96543753,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025332826,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002313389,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999714},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2947980340","doi":"10.7202/1059144ar","title":"Le droit international privé du divorce et de la filiation adoptive : un renversement de la méthodologie conflictuelle","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.017089917024183315,"score_gpt":0.29351922453878676,"score_spread":0.27642930751460343,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2947980340","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.61759293,0.000406791,0.009540213,0.011853423,0.0013141587,0.00044223963,0.00006877383,0.000113063055,0.3586684],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9694687,0.003512887,0.0032514795,0.0008052831,0.00082606653,0.000039617993,0.000063882064,0.000030987972,0.02200106],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969346,0.0014119068,0.00035532896,0.00041670495,0.00034436956,0.00053710444],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99792784,0.0012003954,0.00029062518,0.00025449548,0.00013055744,0.00019607632],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038201336,0.0001720912,0.00027538135,0.00009520952,0.0002694105,0.00019142512,0.000438844,0.0004539829,0.0012636267],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005352667,0.0002772537,0.00020982676,0.0002459076,0.00042039182,0.00038145075,0.00014753331,0.00043991324,0.0002095243],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008255496,0.00032019266,0.059280515,0.00008104525,0.00014827272,0.000053048487,0.02141595,0.0016240294,0.0013033801,0.9034695,0.0013295036,0.010892005],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015965662,0.00020394729,0.12390319,0.0003373853,0.00012665195,0.000086151034,0.0040665534,0.009033374,0.0009987418,0.07389831,0.78522146,0.0005276442],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004147744,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00039194233,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8295712,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013240931,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007033387,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999968},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2949196423","doi":"10.11575/prism/32682","title":"An Evaluation of the Clicklaw Wikibook JP Boyd on Family Law: Final Report","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Open MIND","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Law Foundation of British Columbia","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.18161608580275274,"score_gpt":0.43475547581112456,"score_spread":0.2531393900083718,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2949196423","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.59364307,0.0000068190034,0.0000073365977,0.0012058867,0.00017648716,0.00028160782,0.000004226876,0.0000010232322,0.40467355],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98925936,0.000005750243,0.00007152984,0.000096356656,0.00014618631,0.000011079542,0.0000017632713,0.0000036718222,0.010404287],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986521,0.0002581954,0.00017827134,0.00017553904,0.0006229564,0.000112958536],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992727,0.000045840854,0.00015438868,0.00030487013,0.00017695002,0.000045273166],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027777227,0.000049565613,0.000079082936,0.000018026725,0.00029286527,0.00007043942,0.00032841225,0.000055260083,0.0014045245],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010203317,0.000029086386,0.000039833845,0.000090734684,0.00017168779,0.00029070498,0.00004175477,0.00003689971,0.00007449793],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006278454,0.00014784318,0.0019694662,8.394546e-7,0.000015470623,0.0000036803951,0.0060979836,0.0000067120673,0.0135152405,0.020534886,0.0010134298,0.95663166],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00049165875,0.00011479935,0.022198984,0.00005625581,0.000039201208,0.0000017256181,0.0006730985,0.000023678365,0.0068236385,0.0015174311,0.96797454,0.00008501085],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025618263,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0043139053,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9669611,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007308281,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003136599,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995083},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2951920380","doi":"","title":"BOOK REVIEW: INTERNATIONAL LAW CHIEFLY AS INTERPRETED AND APPLIED IN CANADA, 8TH EDITION","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.016260050953258963,"score_gpt":0.2758640490587191,"score_spread":0.25960399810546014,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2951920380","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00009841204,0.48354024,9.858728e-7,0.19811302,0.00044139242,0.00065274735,0.000018579423,0.000010210571,0.3171244],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.13581419,0.5156452,0.000006810992,0.34514427,0.00041427356,0.00008475176,0.000046060406,0.0000125351635,0.0028318954],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990858,0.00012467086,0.00019920462,0.0001249283,0.00027616494,0.0001892643],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993782,0.000027703452,0.00006606385,0.00013240166,0.00006873339,0.0003268917],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00088735647,0.00007501649,0.00017073844,0.000028030685,0.0001710143,0.00003522821,0.00021968494,0.000028149296,0.001097048],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013035476,0.000060725193,0.000022811839,0.0001316479,0.00009401774,0.000100676414,0.000018597008,0.00012474522,0.000048742215],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000026232005,0.0000024661306,0.000070735725,0.00019670703,0.000010757315,0.000006996632,0.00070081087,2.9965673e-7,3.129931e-7,0.0808441,0.8956542,0.022509998],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000067409535,0.0000050860936,0.00039676862,0.0019083369,0.000017699853,0.0000034461514,0.00006573117,0.0000032426228,5.275489e-7,0.0003161554,0.99714196,0.0000736374],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9958961,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9997607,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31429252,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001150384,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027724097,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99981606},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2954472095","doi":"","title":"CANADA V CRAIG - THE COMMON LAW AS THE SERVANT OF SOCIETY","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.022211428900739433,"score_gpt":0.2741144784323228,"score_spread":0.2519030495315834,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2954472095","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0052958988,0.03326448,2.3162882e-7,0.76681316,0.00024285933,0.0011147126,0.00002338364,0.000009615284,0.19323564],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8627928,0.023866963,0.0000031216564,0.10897571,0.00018200041,0.000051685285,0.00000339277,0.000009263264,0.004115071],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989023,0.0002853044,0.0001773504,0.00007836127,0.00029795794,0.00025870334],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991276,0.00014674825,0.000088317414,0.00037443708,0.00009910791,0.00016376935],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011151885,0.00007321081,0.0001494291,0.0000033620383,0.0014673249,0.000061245184,0.0006040768,0.00003251042,0.001571226],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004103855,0.000033493267,0.0001038695,0.00017645418,0.00038039588,0.00005777515,0.000024479605,0.00015555588,0.00006715498],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[3.0864263e-7,0.0000030514614,0.00014646525,0.000114914226,0.000038680526,0.0000010114353,0.004560514,9.924532e-7,0.0000020886723,0.44956017,0.52503186,0.020539923],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018034807,0.0000047352955,0.00150638,0.00017298832,0.00003270642,0.0000013703018,0.0005671551,0.0000064597966,0.0000017715603,0.00094768807,0.9966917,0.000049027312],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.999847,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99995786,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8574969,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024778757,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023732032,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99983263},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2955714486","doi":"10.3138/9781487530167-007","title":"5. The Reference Jurisdiction of the Supreme Court of Canada","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of Toronto Press eBooks","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Jurisdiction; Law; Political science; Original jurisdiction","score_opus":0.021246436787885407,"score_gpt":0.217124683386625,"score_spread":0.1958782465987396,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2955714486","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00029476345,0.0005226871,0.000006285268,0.00010924559,0.000507798,0.00028134632,0.00009596213,0.000007952504,0.99817395],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.05111607,0.00086585013,0.000008007178,0.000006450224,0.000056573965,8.136978e-8,0.0000020959892,0.0000069000553,0.94793797],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989305,0.000060196064,0.00016865108,0.00013611064,0.0005728409,0.00013169668],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986661,0.00011129213,0.00050521793,0.0003675431,0.0003059188,0.000043945347],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00023380987,0.00010338188,0.000216037,0.000007179407,0.00038099932,0.000006516191,0.0006091142,0.00017672048,0.00016836503],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000010639474,0.00008397167,0.000119661265,0.0000013991481,0.00048741524,0.000054583114,0.00013759706,0.00013005188,2.9411856e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001495592,0.00001126453,0.00006575877,0.00007669703,0.00020704986,8.5458265e-7,0.01597922,0.000009671211,0.0001056456,0.957773,0.017316079,0.008305244],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012513188,0.00002903929,0.00054281665,0.00010283797,0.00008196506,1.114389e-7,0.00043454376,0.0000063322695,0.00007675687,0.0002295228,0.99829257,0.000078362624],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9812673,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9915993,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9809765,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003305834,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011931501,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34242654},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2956195834","doi":"","title":"CASE COMMENTS - COMMENTAIRES D'ARRET - SAUVE V. CANADA: THE RIGHT THING TO DO FOR WRONGDOERS?","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.03651461795572938,"score_gpt":0.3192425386169643,"score_spread":0.2827279206612349,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2956195834","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0065820105,0.017682223,0.00002981595,0.9543054,0.0007631546,0.0027804733,0.00018759504,0.000023184677,0.017646132],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8627372,0.0033155472,0.00005066643,0.13284753,0.00028064847,0.00015581302,0.00001575356,0.000017867138,0.00057902304],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987997,0.00017659554,0.00020230979,0.00014653016,0.00025338927,0.00042150263],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99898523,0.00013960381,0.00006768902,0.00031789846,0.00006978371,0.0004197719],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012943075,0.00011212544,0.00017739188,0.000022969782,0.0029796117,0.00012757177,0.0004423976,0.000035476365,0.0003632417],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001439086,0.00006906194,0.000075287855,0.00020478175,0.00010634465,0.00007511146,0.00002779435,0.00013372167,0.000020769423],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000043367545,0.000009231539,0.00024512698,0.00016700043,0.00007865924,0.00030653065,0.015416263,0.000018579305,3.4083973e-7,0.23132573,0.70960724,0.04282096],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010468884,0.000012680111,0.00014424518,0.00037795465,0.000058816153,0.00004308939,0.0010324713,0.0000012845129,0.000001510456,0.00050155964,0.99761724,0.00010443337],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9976953,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.999884,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85615516,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016539922,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022694427,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9983184},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2963240845","doi":"","title":"LE LIVRE X DU CODE CIVIL DU QUEBEC : BILAN ET ENJEUX","year":2010,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Jurisprudence; Political science; Civil code; Conflict of laws; Jurisdiction","score_opus":0.031406309937161064,"score_gpt":0.29141230250977135,"score_spread":0.26000599257261026,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2963240845","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0020011715,0.13971308,0.0000026486857,0.6624568,0.0019286209,0.00048046678,0.00006300227,0.00002799845,0.19332619],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5666645,0.36164606,0.000024566785,0.03988663,0.0022489824,0.000040103438,0.000022991013,0.00003949814,0.02942664],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981097,0.0005304062,0.0003041689,0.00025242026,0.00026832905,0.0005349738],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99839985,0.00012573056,0.00013490634,0.00048743852,0.00016258372,0.0006894775],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023717186,0.00018913964,0.00032687574,0.000042056497,0.001252162,0.0001714063,0.0005974713,0.00018281022,0.008183301],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00034448263,0.00015586616,0.0001970977,0.00040384257,0.00060487015,0.00020368915,0.000039280887,0.00052550796,0.0010823385],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[7.2508533e-7,0.000019738525,0.00028435257,0.0003194276,0.000022761635,0.000017503595,0.0035399382,2.2126791e-7,0.000007444954,0.747114,0.14597617,0.10269773],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007984821,0.00001743998,0.0016311193,0.001217752,0.000097189535,0.0000221574,0.00019651325,0.000012155202,0.000001933038,0.00069502386,0.9958276,0.00020125828],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9691494,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9997512,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8498514,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002339184,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0051087867,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996954},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2963942600","doi":"10.7202/1065029ar","title":"La gestation pour autrui : l’influence des droits fondamentaux européens sur le droit international privé","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue québécoise de droit international","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.015212320402516182,"score_gpt":0.2700815275447722,"score_spread":0.254869207142256,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2963942600","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.739258,0.00031522074,0.0013332346,0.012456847,0.0035992116,0.0003704026,0.00018296478,0.00012712563,0.24235702],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9137485,0.0014879556,0.000972005,0.00064883893,0.0012871255,0.000040793082,0.00016705567,0.00006237461,0.08158535],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966674,0.00030694366,0.0007324998,0.00071786705,0.0009396816,0.0006356226],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976278,0.00044486273,0.00051394466,0.0003297493,0.00078249414,0.00030113588],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00110494,0.00034365573,0.00033981667,0.00030573725,0.00030716005,0.0004265754,0.0010286086,0.00034277124,0.0025384005],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00042206148,0.00048565026,0.00031903535,0.00038871475,0.0004794202,0.0015497807,0.0001495027,0.000533866,0.0012304673],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011306442,0.0006676027,0.029616341,0.00011167006,0.00031668568,0.000110641005,0.010652397,0.001730396,0.0025707837,0.8906522,0.0011031516,0.062355105],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015017524,0.00011838315,0.11670684,0.0007212229,0.000079318044,0.00023677478,0.0011298336,0.01405976,0.00024396542,0.04872097,0.81587654,0.000604632],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017678836,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0075502107,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84193116,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023056814,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012164381,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997595},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2967660575","doi":"","title":"LA REFONTE DU CODE CIVIL ROUMAIN ET LE CODE CIVIL DU QUEBEC","year":2010,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Civil code; Decree; Legislation; Law; Code (set theory); Statute; Political science; Romanian; Civil procedure; Politics; Civil law (Civil law); Commercial law; Computer science","score_opus":0.02155987300214066,"score_gpt":0.28327152944110456,"score_spread":0.2617116564389639,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2967660575","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0035991035,0.10621902,0.000009381484,0.5661068,0.0016061242,0.00058418786,0.00015346459,0.00004284467,0.32167906],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6831445,0.2558672,0.000030612657,0.026496008,0.0014212927,0.000058826234,0.000029169983,0.0000568997,0.032895435],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968224,0.0013517345,0.00043139033,0.00034550042,0.00036623332,0.00068274536],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979662,0.00025067947,0.00020639603,0.0006284503,0.00016500714,0.00078332215],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0052727605,0.0002653389,0.00046354163,0.00005178246,0.0013189877,0.00023545674,0.00076841685,0.0002813307,0.0062061595],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00047193957,0.00022176649,0.00025672818,0.00045395613,0.0009518537,0.00028772393,0.00005978515,0.00081844226,0.00074198074],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000022615252,0.000030858264,0.0002397912,0.0003474777,0.00004241651,0.00004915091,0.004793037,4.4890734e-7,0.000020170808,0.74997807,0.14699899,0.097497314],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016494672,0.000018081202,0.0011526088,0.0015633467,0.00012767158,0.000043850738,0.0003408204,0.00003230272,0.000004227254,0.00056670175,0.99571145,0.00027398247],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9514914,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9998692,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8487125,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005364586,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0039143744,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99998116},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2979039387","doi":"","title":"Japan's Dismissal Restriction System in Comparison with Germany and South Korea","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian parliamentary review","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dismissal; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.025182728982518856,"score_gpt":0.28092764596142705,"score_spread":0.2557449169789082,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2979039387","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8487882,0.08645042,0.000027530463,0.009167217,0.0003635993,0.0016938366,0.000037532784,0.000099167366,0.0533725],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9670819,0.031566847,0.0000235818,0.0009634393,0.00012344489,0.000035504167,0.0000194935,0.000009461729,0.00017635242],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989273,0.00012923326,0.0002352454,0.0002070278,0.00018582419,0.00031539376],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993352,0.000019006864,0.00008049069,0.00013125734,0.000026051239,0.00040796964],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003819221,0.00010628974,0.00024736632,0.00010247695,0.000271027,0.000050802617,0.00009103971,0.000049324346,0.00011554776],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000009101121,0.00009718261,0.000027503827,0.00036577802,0.00008929421,0.00015717169,0.000007334249,0.00011273453,0.000021210488],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024589233,0.00003387284,0.86676097,0.00077747845,0.000040700437,0.0001500376,0.006728991,0.0000046130403,0.000002523385,0.004793845,0.010293018,0.11038936],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023624077,0.000052421434,0.08095052,0.002268693,0.00006502354,0.000014751095,0.0052875304,0.00004222175,3.3415512e-7,0.000007883017,0.91089624,0.00017816728],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.57599115,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.814674,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9006032,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00052941917,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026525548,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42683235},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2979843472","doi":"","title":"Edwards v Attorney‐General for Canada (1930)","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.025694178086829944,"score_gpt":0.23581948786598,"score_spread":0.21012530977915006,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2979843472","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00019805996,0.00006541807,0.0001375304,0.000108048785,0.001087489,0.00057424366,0.00036672046,0.00009622633,0.99736625],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00018977819,0.0005078586,0.00013034996,0.0001168986,0.0011807287,0.0000024091996,0.00008871085,0.000027616474,0.99775565],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985115,0.00006399025,0.00014474937,0.00035851306,0.0004984798,0.00042278305],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99901384,0.00008869866,0.00018011499,0.00025339174,0.0002228049,0.00024113647],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00013006608,0.00022917853,0.0003080643,0.00007631337,0.0011200584,0.000041967985,0.0005071287,0.00039367806,0.000030042234],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001393694,0.00028886937,0.00020417951,0.000014950925,0.00025326328,0.00008240509,0.000109409266,0.00024160133,2.5448117e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000909136,0.0000090752565,0.00000894782,0.000036992882,0.00010406008,0.000058446793,0.0016459868,0.0000049796513,0.0000013253173,0.5349178,0.45691603,0.0062054647],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037416926,0.000041706917,0.000018435692,0.000033864206,0.00009198014,0.0000012690168,0.00009161647,0.00001686426,0.0000071826803,0.00009800168,0.99889874,0.00032616238],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.59418184,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.75766855,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5419827,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014541796,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0054655536,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99995637},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2982233201","doi":"","title":"Substance and Procedure in Private International Law by Richard Garnett","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Melbourne journal of international law","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Publishing; Project commissioning; Conflict of laws; Political science; Sociology; Media studies","score_opus":0.010014374189077474,"score_gpt":0.2740219235597967,"score_spread":0.26400754937071924,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2982233201","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.79779714,0.00079496985,0.00023120879,0.026872793,0.0018132087,0.0001975024,0.000013791013,0.000019610503,0.17225975],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9936564,0.0011077789,0.00048030837,0.001079447,0.0006990697,0.0000066112166,0.000004784331,0.00001040856,0.002955168],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983494,0.00007274368,0.00049332925,0.00014139089,0.0007425629,0.0002005323],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99886096,0.000067660054,0.00038178195,0.000057506062,0.0004951378,0.00013697059],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00072631193,0.000109372406,0.00017284592,0.0001174466,0.00014016814,0.00025123052,0.00042204247,0.00008572658,0.0007873858],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000909106,0.00009923284,0.00006969489,0.00010447515,0.0002095778,0.0011076671,0.00003575599,0.00028245128,0.000018629229],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007049294,0.00016967744,0.0189618,0.0000063621314,0.00009801558,0.000021497814,0.0037622198,0.000016197233,0.0025471908,0.9646574,0.007521167,0.0021679732],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011522233,0.0000754857,0.018603016,0.00015349059,0.0000112291345,0.000057959096,0.0006243345,0.00016015055,0.0008107378,0.024596915,0.95356274,0.00019174539],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014045746,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0026773585,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9460415,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001932395,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000056790876,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8621322},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2991368215","doi":"10.5539/jpl.v12n4p79","title":"On the Establishment and Application of Broad Prohibition of Repeated Suits in Chinese Law – With “The Requests in the Latter Lawsuit Essentially Deny the Judgement in the Former Lawsuit” as the Object","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Politics and Law","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Lawsuit; Law; Element (criminal law); Civil procedure; Judgement; Obligation; Political science","score_opus":0.0074096594414209726,"score_gpt":0.27845177316236713,"score_spread":0.27104211372094617,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2991368215","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9478171,0.00012359268,0.000008827752,0.03588664,0.000043543067,0.0007244242,0.0000036207641,0.0000014204318,0.015390819],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969142,0.00011752722,0.0000032904647,0.0027734127,0.00008587603,0.00001905881,0.000001134552,0.000005069607,0.00008043438],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99828273,0.0005318795,0.00036050502,0.00009401048,0.00054777303,0.00018308776],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986824,0.0006091309,0.00034461223,0.00022109151,0.00012161803,0.000021152315],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0041132574,0.00009224881,0.00014533501,0.000038886366,0.0002605615,0.00013403616,0.00030823742,0.000046313573,0.00001213386],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000049211038,0.000030706808,0.00004352228,0.00024511162,0.0003847706,0.0001523994,0.000030720475,0.00027471533,5.817531e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008814275,0.00014602595,0.009767665,0.000019617264,0.000022920924,0.000002508928,0.037460335,0.000034365257,0.00030249445,0.9516728,0.00011927517,0.00036384762],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0034296333,0.0015942021,0.7379342,0.0006210609,0.0001981154,0.00008313104,0.043576602,0.0003088942,0.00091990305,0.09646091,0.11454019,0.0003331774],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012120539,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04297915,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8552119,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000040776824,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000067751724,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99445784},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2991960392","doi":"","title":"Marriage and cohabitation contracts","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cohabitation; Business; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.011275600041635128,"score_gpt":0.29874217455912305,"score_spread":0.2874665745174879,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2991960392","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.63236994,0.000048481423,0.0006938004,0.006991324,0.00012530676,0.00008973389,4.4408534e-7,0.00005830518,0.35962263],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978946,0.000066009445,0.00028689968,0.00028374352,0.00008558956,0.0000017287281,6.4640466e-7,0.0000014028243,0.0013793813],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997368,0.000013815444,0.000042255542,0.000051889307,0.00008495452,0.000070300586],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998678,0.000025420532,0.000013273428,0.00002389156,0.000023467372,0.00004614735],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00017385712,0.00002054458,0.000029000037,0.000013488385,0.00017248582,0.00004168641,0.000018316181,0.000026560972,0.00013272063],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004395252,0.000018979605,0.000008335993,0.000039746155,0.000055180855,0.00012776037,0.000003671777,0.000020011892,0.000019590507],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005546291,0.000019266552,0.0019867325,0.0000013375446,0.0000036501667,0.000001945374,0.010282074,0.0000034585391,0.0006614817,0.9624796,0.00022004309,0.024334887],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011319153,0.000073434494,0.19218802,0.000013220324,0.000012015566,0.0000014712791,0.0046884427,0.000010560862,0.0004765622,0.051719025,0.7495332,0.00015217987],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029114378,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0041341637,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9107605,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000021011885,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000311292,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4401242},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2993622183","doi":"","title":"Culture Change - A Tale of Two Cities and Mandatory Court-Connected Mediation","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mediation; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.026913421353771914,"score_gpt":0.2780342440047755,"score_spread":0.2511208226510036,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2993622183","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91366726,0.003732915,0.000024310115,0.0026020482,0.00054675125,0.00040082657,0.00005003962,0.0001481499,0.07882771],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99484634,0.0010646757,0.000098669094,0.00039884972,0.0007132159,0.000025598225,0.0000112241405,0.0000080994905,0.002833301],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99910426,0.00009095125,0.00015841627,0.00015851308,0.00030142645,0.00018640656],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995101,0.000044489432,0.00010136373,0.00011391232,0.00010064319,0.00012950093],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00026262962,0.000087235494,0.00014351652,0.000041169398,0.00033551786,0.00006269003,0.000095812284,0.000098827375,0.0013203264],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000067339344,0.00008431106,0.00004046905,0.00014498245,0.00024862032,0.00041336514,0.000025255955,0.00011028973,0.000036202706],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006271219,0.00031834393,0.05468758,0.00016716501,0.00014224112,0.000022249862,0.1941892,0.000003357063,0.004545015,0.68501115,0.032860067,0.027990935],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001134233,0.0001162236,0.012683776,0.00006657983,0.000040669118,0.00000261097,0.0040393155,0.00016040645,0.00054573384,0.0025906789,0.9783527,0.00026702054],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0048777475,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009985812,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9454927,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000039221435,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000016657836,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995926},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2994269004","doi":"10.3138/cjcrim.42.3.355","title":"Gladue: The judicial and political reception of a promising decision","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Criminology","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Political science; Judicial opinion; Law and economics; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.04809534679410901,"score_gpt":0.31309349475969894,"score_spread":0.26499814796558996,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2994269004","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97835374,0.00029434415,0.0000548559,0.0090293335,0.0002785971,0.00004849901,0.0000015657665,0.0000018102523,0.011937226],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990814,0.000105240746,0.00011659538,0.00024535006,0.00036197767,2.7976623e-7,1.6946836e-7,0.0000027643014,0.00008623442],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99927306,0.00012564979,0.00021260588,0.00005131313,0.00011326737,0.000224122],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993733,0.00011942778,0.00007834704,0.000051132556,0.00012060187,0.00025718182],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004889999,0.000038120612,0.000112145375,0.000105350395,0.00027506493,0.000025704938,0.00010932884,0.000086512235,0.0006993855],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00024454755,0.000029259076,0.000037999187,0.000052697615,0.00054082565,0.00008473824,0.000002866682,0.00013013295,0.0000029836895],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008267555,0.000011364193,0.0036833752,0.0000037648301,0.000017879996,0.000029628603,0.014704001,0.0000031722182,0.00014442412,0.18369816,0.0012527468,0.79636884],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00080211286,0.00055815163,0.17683932,0.0001115418,0.00011865896,0.0003570764,0.0056841667,0.000023422834,0.00016500075,0.102543384,0.7126497,0.00014744402],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.030415311,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.059095155,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7962214,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007758332,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00078057544,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97604126},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2999433751","doi":"","title":"Of Magnets and Centrifuges: The US and EU Federal Systems and Private International Law","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"European union; Conflict of laws; Law; Political science; Tribute; Federal law; International law; Private law; Context (archaeology); Comparative law; Legislation; Business; International trade; Geography","score_opus":0.006089811896752751,"score_gpt":0.24844578656795285,"score_spread":0.2423559746712001,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2999433751","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.982879,0.003921096,0.00003632237,0.003918844,0.0003026256,0.00012531182,0.0000014529951,0.0000062260874,0.008809155],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9898133,0.008430554,0.000004217277,0.00007913527,0.00017850118,8.028662e-7,4.1949968e-7,0.0000037519594,0.0014893175],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999058,0.0000793629,0.00012892536,0.000086323045,0.00020860245,0.00043877235],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99972206,0.00004323939,0.00010089022,0.00004165623,0.0000462091,0.000045916575],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001089787,0.000052974978,0.00008647885,0.000025726498,0.00029894168,0.00016385496,0.00009081297,0.000039903276,0.000016168226],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001426504,0.0000375975,0.000018619916,0.000036397483,0.00013475472,0.00016780004,0.000029112816,0.0003065098,9.4294876e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020585794,0.000008009858,0.01857696,0.0000045108154,0.000040304556,3.7772722e-7,0.0012373414,0.000002184279,0.00017805722,0.9762426,0.000009034209,0.0036800357],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0026821273,0.00076523185,0.051633317,0.000112044814,0.00006831611,0.0005555227,0.016582558,0.0008599246,0.000048405476,0.07266021,0.8536947,0.00033764547],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013253066,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024324486,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9035824,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008805573,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018006867,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22992478},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3000242353","doi":"10.1177/1023263x19888590","title":"Transatlantic enforcement of Dutch collective settlement judgments: the case of Canada","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Settlement (finance); Appeal; Human settlement; Enforcement; Class action; Political science; Law; Collective action; Perspective (graphical); European court of justice; Law and economics; Sociology; Business; Geography; International trade; European Union law; European union; Politics; Archaeology","score_opus":0.06147016887756197,"score_gpt":0.2843131598444432,"score_spread":0.22284299096688126,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3000242353","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6486873,0.0006002316,0.000796492,0.004070678,0.00020309733,0.000323522,0.00006418442,0.0000040109057,0.3452505],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993257,0.000065201864,0.00003786935,0.00030264514,0.000105931445,3.7199268e-7,5.9974934e-7,0.000002823585,0.00015889033],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99876416,0.00038627008,0.00039810123,0.00006682448,0.0002706831,0.00011396521],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991306,0.00010979589,0.00036898238,0.000045115405,0.00023103254,0.0001144531],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005005083,0.00007291927,0.00021752696,0.000022255324,0.00023399701,0.00002200544,0.00013137133,0.0000088856095,0.00014297577],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000013749497,0.00005001668,0.000052382693,0.00020353773,0.00017780249,0.000065831424,0.000021530164,0.000107771295,3.091533e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013195872,0.00049209653,0.0033761668,0.0001300379,0.0015139115,0.0016331684,0.3595559,0.001507126,0.0019962797,0.5891288,0.033260394,0.0060865106],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00449658,0.0032120736,0.009424755,0.00019765687,0.00048808442,0.00022889728,0.13329425,0.00059875567,0.0052585513,0.0004685543,0.841938,0.0003938295],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02894695,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.059850387,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8086776,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000054584052,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00028062295,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9775194},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3003349098","doi":"10.36253/978-88-6655-255-0","title":"La mediazione familiare. Modelli, principi, obiettivi","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Studi e saggi","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Mediation; Subject matter; Jurisprudence; Perspective (graphical); Law; Sociology; Law and economics","score_opus":0.021860788264776197,"score_gpt":0.2966032637889476,"score_spread":0.27474247552417136,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3003349098","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0004073523,0.0017849539,0.0001023296,0.0012108417,0.001281122,0.000720123,0.000040141815,0.00024753137,0.9942056],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.009308719,0.006685317,0.00008386549,0.00022303603,0.0024260338,0.00009998671,0.00004815515,0.00005739542,0.9810675],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974242,0.00021096737,0.0003619515,0.0005041725,0.0009902384,0.00050849403],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986348,0.00027311235,0.00023592655,0.00038598408,0.00024359477,0.00022654617],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00087012234,0.00033162584,0.00048130206,0.00012280677,0.0006296639,0.00011707357,0.0004430598,0.0006935689,0.0011396207],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000937102,0.00032116115,0.00022741695,0.00012916108,0.00053924375,0.00016713649,0.00018973033,0.0006310358,0.0010666513],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001836202,0.00015978987,0.00022444474,0.00009055776,0.00029720474,0.000046062552,0.03123174,0.000010640311,0.000010697953,0.23157045,0.64191324,0.09442678],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019589966,0.00003972576,0.00025701057,0.00012302175,0.00007165377,8.264632e-7,0.00057797425,0.000014707338,0.0000012643559,0.011052866,0.9873095,0.000355506],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012284077,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021473106,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.34539628,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00048370822,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010186811,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99992406},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3003431644","doi":"","title":"Recognizing the Relevance of Human Rights: The Application of the Presumption of Conformity in the Context of Copyright","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Presumption; Conformity; Context (archaeology); Human rights; Law and economics; Relevance (law); Presumption of innocence; Intellectual property; Law; Political science; Conformity assessment; Business; Sociology; Economics; Geography","score_opus":0.022731631576189907,"score_gpt":0.3042069912945416,"score_spread":0.2814753597183517,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3003431644","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9564186,0.00018474925,0.000084097555,0.0016110287,0.00016598115,0.0008698517,0.00001857379,0.00000968159,0.040637452],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99941176,0.000039921106,0.000019510991,0.00014037736,0.00014721787,0.000027598897,0.000001993289,0.000003994146,0.0002076297],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99842066,0.00040393963,0.0004643347,0.00012361132,0.0004506366,0.00013679828],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99818784,0.00040374312,0.0006048694,0.0004987021,0.00028538983,0.000019479281],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021247664,0.000076039105,0.000169732,0.000019987541,0.00060047687,0.00001830448,0.0006905814,0.00007988529,0.00007436282],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013289688,0.00003458865,0.0000960796,0.00031566285,0.0015134256,0.00016706812,0.0000480451,0.00017401198,0.000004878551],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000818941,0.00012574124,0.008556426,0.000045397235,0.00003298671,5.356299e-8,0.030743498,0.000003538585,0.01158857,0.9415082,0.0007399678,0.006573751],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011471125,0.00031275483,0.13084947,0.00036445275,0.00012102142,0.0000012140614,0.011337334,0.0002172448,0.11028643,0.051344816,0.69379807,0.00022008244],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.032731056,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.087118864,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89016336,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000031407773,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000053480147,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97371006},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3006902917","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190695620.013.7","title":"Postcolonial Legal Studies","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Orientalism; Scholarship; Reading (process); Field (mathematics); Sign (mathematics); Sociology; History; Political science; Law; Literature; Art","score_opus":0.05113801757809438,"score_gpt":0.2764375093115878,"score_spread":0.2252994917334934,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3006902917","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00006598492,0.00016211274,0.000012964413,0.0009204414,0.00052601413,0.00029889605,0.0000557501,0.00018559002,0.9977722],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0023060248,0.0012353974,0.000045096833,0.00014881122,0.00064175203,3.896414e-7,0.000008412379,0.000020332733,0.9955938],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989056,0.000046150373,0.00012512882,0.00032652955,0.0003740928,0.00022249487],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992853,0.0000636481,0.00015549011,0.00016582613,0.00016397268,0.00016576535],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00011325333,0.00020606632,0.00031697078,0.00007315051,0.00071945775,0.000063140564,0.000354236,0.00030948326,0.000064520755],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000017943126,0.00024661512,0.000197159,0.000008031741,0.00046878663,0.00012269516,0.00025514918,0.00033410828,0.00000375196],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008363626,0.0000036624808,0.0000015905588,0.000018419663,0.00017501824,0.0001509965,0.0040243575,3.9001247e-7,0.0000025904794,0.98501205,0.005093748,0.005433533],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024421053,0.00007541249,0.0000035999606,0.000052123418,0.000170138,9.248198e-7,0.00059885345,0.0000018594151,0.000005625243,0.0008455105,0.9977503,0.0002514315],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006993995,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010777892,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9926566,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024720895,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023225772,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999986},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3010365700","doi":"","title":"A Survey and Critique of the “Seller in Possession” Statutory Regimes of Common Law Canada: An ABC Prequel","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statutory law; Law; Possession (linguistics); Common law; Political science; Comparative law; Civil law (Civil law); Public law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.01603979151317123,"score_gpt":0.28702845409056554,"score_spread":0.2709886625773943,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3010365700","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96088696,0.0003305404,0.0000010573083,0.0006312079,0.000245742,0.0002619533,0.000043166474,0.000010051869,0.03758935],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978881,0.00007205161,0.0000148515255,0.00045265563,0.000030251402,0.0000045239026,0.000005147198,0.000007970119,0.0015244653],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99843657,0.00060239976,0.0002552515,0.00016973427,0.0003443663,0.00019169923],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999094,0.00026665506,0.0001288342,0.0002797379,0.00012512696,0.00010563149],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010282218,0.000083389416,0.00021255216,0.00002139206,0.0001700726,0.000029477624,0.00022864093,0.00009472423,0.00014206678],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007871868,0.000067127614,0.000029848972,0.00015823514,0.00029661684,0.00027985728,0.000051932206,0.00017936538,0.0000011732279],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005377595,0.000118980446,0.69461745,0.000052310603,0.000015342117,0.0000022823888,0.0039636665,0.000018668814,0.0006287438,0.2988445,0.0012268431,0.00045745578],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00041790982,0.000061005663,0.9022376,0.00012804926,0.0000063949624,4.0765747e-7,0.001699339,0.00002558591,0.0006106783,0.0017521691,0.09292091,0.00013996908],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9767326,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99537957,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.29709232,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008928582,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00069436105,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27373847},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3010920414","doi":"","title":"Whose Law Governs Your Data?: Takedown Orders and 'Territoriality' in Comparative Perspective","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Political science; Territoriality; European union; Order (exchange); Law; International law; Comity; Law and economics; Business; Sociology; International trade","score_opus":0.10713339401268357,"score_gpt":0.4113434876144245,"score_spread":0.30421009360174095,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3010920414","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.433578,0.00007753249,0.000017859633,0.004387197,0.0009476617,0.0003361962,0.00003427454,0.00004608887,0.5605752],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9961724,0.000043468557,0.00007281389,0.00015559113,0.00038549025,0.0000028720701,0.000008589237,0.000003712373,0.00315503],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99905276,0.00011404494,0.00011868965,0.00028633216,0.00024780564,0.0001803872],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995329,0.000080575475,0.00004365567,0.00020730846,0.00006711224,0.00006846262],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00045105803,0.00007536633,0.00015431653,0.000026459651,0.00015201341,0.00011246918,0.00018477703,0.0000671881,0.00041903634],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000032754455,0.000070063725,0.000016982644,0.00013392961,0.00017770784,0.0005406677,0.000088574074,0.00010551592,0.000053045966],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003296077,0.00005829989,0.010358314,0.0000026821629,0.000015783055,0.0000015594652,0.061364774,0.000001785447,0.00005521731,0.926269,0.0016110273,0.00022859492],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00069479755,0.000062161635,0.015549912,0.000013786955,0.000008734321,4.4782186e-7,0.10707526,0.00019341904,0.000017151233,0.0027676644,0.8734478,0.00016888273],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.23648486,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.22163747,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9235013,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013854155,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008352458,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7925656},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3011226166","doi":"","title":"Amending Authors and Constitutional Discourse","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law; Constitutional law","score_opus":0.031353111407934495,"score_gpt":0.3063425613770974,"score_spread":0.2749894499691629,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3011226166","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.37437546,0.0009797582,0.00086831127,0.009289045,0.0012353528,0.00025775796,0.000022727978,0.00021956157,0.612752],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99108195,0.00019116423,0.00021037264,0.0003288963,0.0005041768,0.000008329379,0.0000026013786,0.0000045864276,0.007667891],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990831,0.00006911087,0.00012957038,0.00018737922,0.0002819716,0.0002488914],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999528,0.000051327068,0.00004552562,0.00009474243,0.000033586708,0.00024683576],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00033200538,0.00008026424,0.00009849203,0.000035054243,0.00095426256,0.00016627171,0.00009233079,0.000078181954,0.002560983],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007342321,0.00008011545,0.000040915173,0.00011831047,0.0020706896,0.00037047314,0.00002866732,0.00014166997,0.00020337354],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000023603027,0.000023504432,0.002904177,0.0000022715326,0.000008320484,0.0000065443282,0.0015611042,0.0000028091151,0.000073976655,0.99041885,0.0022129484,0.0027831348],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002612043,0.000022313185,0.0014714989,0.000026752756,0.000016335245,0.0000055144287,0.0015317232,0.00008591289,0.00003224638,0.0038274974,0.9925613,0.00015774103],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011532488,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011325743,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99034834,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006874188,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000038292743,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9983508},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3012435264","doi":"10.19195/0137-1134.112.14","title":"Hipoteka polska a hypothèque prowincji Quebec. Porównanie z perspektywy prawa prywatnego międzynarodowego","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Przegląd Prawa i Administracji","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Scope (computer science); Law; Private law; Conflict of laws; Doctrine; Element (criminal law); Perspective (graphical); Comparative law; International law","score_opus":0.02547096924191811,"score_gpt":0.3448648622684423,"score_spread":0.3193938930265242,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3012435264","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.41361937,0.00076651433,0.00038726628,0.048100054,0.0030005912,0.0025188532,0.000100358426,0.0013158262,0.5301912],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9342127,0.00015394238,0.0012287117,0.00091131666,0.0038910815,0.00013256537,0.00003484659,0.00008666837,0.059348207],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99487615,0.00044506308,0.00084043946,0.00109101,0.0013266745,0.0014206389],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968837,0.00031688123,0.00049520365,0.0008752496,0.00063962245,0.0007893313],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017694321,0.000545142,0.0005531725,0.00024658052,0.0018952341,0.0007458989,0.00096023036,0.0005567147,0.004331256],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010285069,0.0005553269,0.00033010478,0.00079211197,0.0015561868,0.0011563386,0.00018298483,0.00058052083,0.0014278558],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0018059928,0.0043735215,0.02917573,0.0004085593,0.00090248504,0.0007483516,0.18935429,0.000005048932,0.017941413,0.3877085,0.22194967,0.14562647],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00073756615,0.0007397652,0.01062808,0.00008934775,0.00009902373,0.00005120435,0.005031391,0.000035748555,0.0019977097,0.0016321704,0.9781576,0.0008004384],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01951531,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06165585,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7562079,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004886393,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002505611,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996898},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3013584812","doi":"10.32082/fp.v5i55.263","title":"Nie koniec historii: dynamika prawa na przykładzie instytucji zasiedzenia","year":2020,"lang":"pl","type":"article","venue":"Forum Prawnicze","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Theology; Political science; Physics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03014482125171007,"score_gpt":0.2768719590568252,"score_spread":0.24672713780511513,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3013584812","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14640528,0.011176169,0.002009983,0.27851498,0.018007342,0.0037389917,0.00052532903,0.001951051,0.53767085],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97120804,0.0010920366,0.000464331,0.0048567024,0.0026340676,0.00006219627,0.00007421651,0.00011708734,0.01949135],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9943951,0.00040160574,0.0010128013,0.0012000137,0.0014361524,0.0015543781],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99708325,0.0002200742,0.0006831819,0.00065953075,0.00028240905,0.0010715688],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.000822469,0.00064333604,0.00078877783,0.00014247152,0.0016827468,0.00047474657,0.0011126045,0.00071977836,0.0026073223],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005936394,0.0006982516,0.0005197845,0.0012416492,0.0006459169,0.001007197,0.00046624715,0.0009687328,0.002250779],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011413342,0.0014364697,0.023210926,0.000619445,0.0009005497,0.00029776472,0.1423691,0.00007934824,0.002886628,0.17705145,0.3734577,0.27654928],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001159236,0.0008294255,0.002975096,0.000101801415,0.00017267358,0.000006605879,0.0031457911,0.0012470032,0.00009349987,0.0004367193,0.9890104,0.0008217513],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0034629207,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030086453,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.82480276,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008604996,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012156097,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996169},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3015260480","doi":"10.5206/uwojls.v10i1.10229","title":"The Evolution of the Duty to Consult","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Western Journal of Legal Studies","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tribunal; Appeal; Duty; Supreme court; Political science; Agency (philosophy); Subject (documents); Law; Indigenous; Work (physics); TRACE (psycholinguistics); Process (computing); Abandonment (legal); Sociology; Engineering; Computer science","score_opus":0.04893452292364313,"score_gpt":0.3429191904893343,"score_spread":0.29398466756569114,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3015260480","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.84110504,0.00445254,0.0001526722,0.1493503,0.0010547317,0.00013479251,0.0000024386877,0.0000074111053,0.0037400569],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982128,0.00042401475,0.000012836405,0.00035390636,0.00049617834,8.1637376e-7,8.520174e-9,0.0000023737148,0.00049704337],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999067,0.00013053439,0.00026456575,0.00004693959,0.00038274963,0.00010821016],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991034,0.00015664258,0.00024720276,0.000053991014,0.0003763394,0.00006242008],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005766969,0.000046884357,0.000134734,0.00001240772,0.0005489191,0.00004130679,0.00024437762,0.000017924078,0.0000037551533],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00060933764,0.000023628767,0.00009189417,0.00018181615,0.00025398523,0.00011246382,0.000069133916,0.00011151786,0.000003893099],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007283814,0.00012648365,0.40626597,0.00006062098,0.0010739365,0.000023036264,0.44044268,0.00026028298,0.0033697917,0.0754204,0.032354854,0.039873574],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022784299,0.00019480819,0.07494232,0.000060101185,0.000044708584,0.000004032805,0.031723436,0.0000019964966,0.00017109879,0.0002480551,0.89233166,0.000049931878],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00035895576,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018724411,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8599768,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008782089,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012837628,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42218974},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3016181407","doi":"","title":"The Ontario Court of Appeal challenges the Canadian Competition Authority over potentially defamatory language it used in a website press release posting (TPG Technology Consulting / Donald Powell / Canada)","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"e-Competitions Bulletin","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Competition (biology); Law; Business; Political science; Media studies; Sociology; Biology; Ecology","score_opus":0.016755511048093887,"score_gpt":0.25221814211281485,"score_spread":0.23546263106472096,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3016181407","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.68524265,0.0026223634,0.000026186171,0.1798995,0.00079544634,0.00080462405,0.000120882556,0.00009367958,0.13039465],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99776006,0.00015808627,0.00014281413,0.00030530198,0.00018510899,0.000035297926,0.00001998976,0.000013058843,0.0013802556],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99799925,0.00033759713,0.00036627427,0.00019755315,0.00049512816,0.00060419866],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99878436,0.00037940586,0.00020682196,0.00027408238,0.00016622515,0.00018911978],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001544972,0.0001454403,0.00018626738,0.00011948889,0.0017643522,0.000076257624,0.00034682165,0.0001654299,0.0009510893],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00027569724,0.00012243836,0.00006365201,0.00020711964,0.00043341357,0.00007289286,0.00006288056,0.00051325007,0.000023715826],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012228567,0.00047872824,0.10034144,0.00010725616,0.00018330791,0.00010058126,0.11403072,0.00011140665,0.0006036183,0.75985897,0.020630127,0.0034315593],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029161514,0.000014270866,0.076407626,0.00008619643,0.000019610321,0.00000761681,0.014390082,0.000015727692,0.00003388076,0.000070324706,0.9085192,0.00014382794],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9941208,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99991596,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8878891,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00081756484,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014462393,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99996215},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3016242284","doi":"","title":"Conceptualizing the Relationship between International Human Rights Law and Private International Law","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Harvard international law journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Private law; Human rights; Political science; Municipal law; Law; International human rights law; International law; Public law; Public international law; Convention; Comparative law; Law and economics; Fundamental rights; Context (archaeology); Doctrine; Sociology; Geography","score_opus":0.04501395622463918,"score_gpt":0.3359462139225189,"score_spread":0.2909322576978797,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3016242284","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20646523,0.000026027708,0.00029886543,0.007865437,0.0050220424,0.00024198437,0.000059146452,0.000075354175,0.7799459],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9893742,0.000025197805,0.00026146942,0.0015161617,0.003597231,0.000009606098,0.00009780541,0.0000199517,0.0050983853],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972498,0.0002499805,0.00060345733,0.0003161091,0.0012644501,0.0003162245],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99820703,0.00055223645,0.00041454704,0.0001833924,0.0004521546,0.00019063125],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014246767,0.00019528762,0.00019551799,0.00011104339,0.0025059155,0.0012149006,0.0010352067,0.00015314348,0.0035447846],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000105299754,0.0001603039,0.00017001544,0.00009383065,0.0007114524,0.00151233,0.00019769631,0.00066028995,0.00044829844],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024239065,0.000030010104,0.058398336,0.0000016618187,0.00016471847,0.0000071826107,0.0018799349,0.000013098825,0.00007377963,0.93881154,0.0004397382,0.00015578819],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007457585,0.000033465283,0.027484618,0.000077919394,0.000025282623,0.00004173763,0.00039584597,0.000048719838,0.000053711126,0.108032905,0.862876,0.00018404874],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033686797,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005638269,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86243623,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00032833547,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000040663996,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99982196},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3022722483","doi":"","title":"The Deconstitutionalization of Canadian Private International Law","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Knowledge@SchulichLaw","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Law; Jurisdiction; Supreme court; Political science; Federalism; Constitutional law; Foundation (evidence); Spar; Engineering","score_opus":0.0228525492798454,"score_gpt":0.30121431506693697,"score_spread":0.27836176578709154,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3022722483","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0056815255,0.00041035074,0.00024445826,0.001989154,0.0015460326,0.00015663172,0.000008265001,0.000029963272,0.9899336],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9917992,0.00032333797,0.00012326488,0.00012801461,0.00022381042,0.000012731349,0.000009087721,0.0000061923824,0.007374372],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990634,0.00013902465,0.00021435642,0.00013097632,0.00021734743,0.00023494883],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992055,0.00011695857,0.000078505596,0.00013969408,0.00030381832,0.00015547557],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007593213,0.000072483235,0.00007929161,0.00012997007,0.0011012201,0.000087894725,0.0002491492,0.000079168254,0.0004905463],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00030549892,0.000062447485,0.00005833896,0.00046065933,0.00053395284,0.00017736042,0.000014960412,0.00007406344,0.000117540774],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000026385026,0.000019828938,0.0016434788,0.0000017098879,0.000018248742,4.4756993e-7,0.001506195,0.000006690017,0.00003740134,0.9934095,0.0015073979,0.0018464695],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013870215,0.000007354481,0.0010707568,0.0000119142915,0.0000075982616,0.0000012026547,0.00023939197,0.000027805063,0.00031953517,0.00948525,0.9886174,0.0000730406],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.046682104,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.74057555,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9871101,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016188662,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006540849,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.95966613},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3023287867","doi":"10.2307/j.ctv5vdctx.9","title":"Chaoulli v Quebec:","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of Ottawa Press eBooks","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"History","score_opus":0.027252614949996912,"score_gpt":0.23425467274110445,"score_spread":0.20700205779110753,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3023287867","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000056293753,0.00014035263,0.00006472521,0.00012356481,0.00032333354,0.00028883823,0.000045195262,0.00007259453,0.9988851],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0047956333,0.00020159916,0.000050992818,0.000024867924,0.00015401261,5.067306e-8,0.0000101872465,0.000016221893,0.99474645],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99902254,0.000033018638,0.0001265342,0.0002492101,0.0003863057,0.00018238823],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991603,0.000053053376,0.00025994412,0.00027782904,0.0001502389,0.00009864619],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00017621831,0.00015262958,0.00028534402,0.00009990294,0.0002628551,0.000022697051,0.0003953643,0.0004057592,0.00089679664],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000005399434,0.00019797208,0.00020059584,0.0000044418302,0.00045882675,0.00007561199,0.00010390564,0.0002175576,0.000069860405],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013335732,0.0000059811837,0.000009453157,0.000029546496,0.00006082413,0.0000118082,0.005117479,0.0000010530888,0.000005909223,0.97623944,0.006843013,0.011662135],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022090519,0.00002815193,0.000033898184,0.00009749354,0.000081829705,2.84793e-7,0.00022777014,0.000002900027,0.0000139389,0.0006577255,0.9984385,0.00019662129],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0891005,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08463682,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99159545,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011745625,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00032238106,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9819294},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3034359653","doi":"","title":"比較的レンズをとおした仲裁の考察：一般的原則と具体的争点 (Looking at Arbitration through A Comparative Lens: General Principles and Specific Issues)","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Arbitration; Dispute resolution; Common law; Law; Comparative law; Political science; Mediation; Civil law (Civil law); China; Alternative dispute resolution; English law; Public law","score_opus":0.07152819640180234,"score_gpt":0.3263341953587405,"score_spread":0.2548059989569381,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3034359653","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93422776,0.013754588,0.002723855,0.01396608,0.00025826006,0.00028747594,0.000002797691,0.000089899324,0.03468925],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9673443,0.027827937,0.00027800363,0.00056283624,0.0020921945,0.000004227959,0.0000043888667,0.00001389274,0.0018722531],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99761885,0.00019866016,0.00030302728,0.00026061307,0.00042440832,0.0011944501],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99948066,0.000033085376,0.00019752685,0.00007556874,0.00009670345,0.00011645626],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00091231894,0.00015155692,0.00022117009,0.000035844427,0.0011831016,0.00015308576,0.00016247803,0.000091265414,0.00011035787],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003053828,0.00014445027,0.00008488832,0.00019260486,0.00016801812,0.00060449017,0.00004639779,0.0008666571,0.00003388105],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011203185,0.00003351441,0.0023521346,0.000004642599,0.00007681081,0.000005488481,0.052135587,0.00005508324,0.0025687346,0.9384785,0.00048058757,0.0036968712],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006610282,0.00034495088,0.0015802936,0.000019899247,0.000032595744,0.00005814202,0.012313014,0.00036404503,0.00042326938,0.0263385,0.9575995,0.00026476034],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004460107,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0060620643,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9571189,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006872901,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006907693,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.909958},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3039612490","doi":"10.3968/11724","title":"International Copyright Law","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian social science","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Intellectual property; Copyright law; Scope (computer science); Law; Treaty; Political science; Subject matter; Convention; Moral rights; Copyright Act; Law and economics; International law; Subject (documents); Common law copyright; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.02575879050887778,"score_gpt":0.3006881086349127,"score_spread":0.2749293181260349,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3039612490","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0033315464,0.000007300167,0.000024192912,0.046083,0.00062388496,0.00006481612,0.0000123247655,0.00004174766,0.94981116],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99019265,0.000007576679,0.00003571692,0.008067419,0.0011928299,0.0000023300333,0.000001595851,0.0000029269484,0.00049696286],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989526,0.000022166834,0.00007364004,0.00017836591,0.00043762528,0.00033558733],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991154,0.000010307676,0.00002590758,0.000037818572,0.00012815133,0.00068239577],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003368033,0.000043067444,0.00005198068,0.000045301073,0.0018955822,0.0002367198,0.00050362386,0.000044843997,0.0013345813],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009178065,0.00004800468,0.00003055166,0.00056439085,0.0011952973,0.00038141242,0.000022649938,0.00007474477,0.00013637732],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000013210142,0.000002217008,0.00097073836,4.2955404e-7,0.0000018487057,0.0000054528678,0.017439408,8.3901924e-8,0.00020921248,0.96670705,0.0060881446,0.008574091],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000047421858,0.0000054548154,0.0006196367,9.875649e-7,0.0000015209646,1.1660421e-7,0.0022464215,0.00002572481,0.00003924625,0.0003018481,0.99664503,0.00006660403],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12606907,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15420882,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9905569,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00040121292,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00087477925,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99957836},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3048873214","doi":"","title":"FOREWORD: Legal Essays: A Checklist","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Checklist; Sociology; Law; Political science; Psychology","score_opus":0.022565913414219874,"score_gpt":0.2817222981809641,"score_spread":0.25915638476674424,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3048873214","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12032949,0.00042141485,0.0005258925,0.04032884,0.0008127543,0.0003901842,0.000036051002,0.0005074468,0.8366479],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9822011,0.000054079926,0.00028176425,0.0055512767,0.0019408566,0.000020246312,0.000008458453,0.000018305627,0.009923907],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99855447,0.00010030886,0.00021769338,0.00029837774,0.00044706423,0.00038206772],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99914294,0.00004479418,0.00007432923,0.00017518026,0.000079681035,0.00048309503],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003508633,0.00012724126,0.00017939198,0.000020724143,0.0006665765,0.00021849132,0.00031340212,0.00012598875,0.0020329182],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019333615,0.00013052754,0.0001231633,0.0003010426,0.00021738971,0.0005074403,0.000063605934,0.0002675361,0.0007521256],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041408923,0.000041834614,0.0017927767,0.000015152065,0.00002327007,0.000022987233,0.0043118726,0.0000064302367,0.00029614675,0.9642466,0.025147207,0.004054354],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003173251,0.000057916634,0.0008345649,0.000013649609,0.000015380258,8.5701214e-7,0.00091249903,0.00008425457,0.00014313399,0.001410277,0.9960365,0.00017361886],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013820467,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01222528,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97088933,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000072362935,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016216205,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988794},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W305326441","doi":"","title":"Celebrating the 50th Anniversary of the Jessup Moot Court Competition","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the Annual Meeting-American Society of International Law","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; International law; Economic Justice; Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.00918782458745182,"score_gpt":0.2647899019119019,"score_spread":0.25560207732445006,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W305326441","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7560795,0.00005498303,0.000016340173,0.057043523,0.00029141334,0.00027917835,0.00005988374,0.000030108244,0.1861451],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99726343,0.00008324986,0.000535966,0.0012246069,0.00026651693,0.0000028388972,0.000001287668,0.0000062930244,0.00061580195],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984532,0.000032843418,0.00033162147,0.0001507186,0.0008649985,0.00016663395],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977917,0.00012592241,0.0009271175,0.0000896111,0.001034433,0.000031230964],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000794329,0.00010258166,0.00018285346,0.000016392994,0.00052393053,0.00003773905,0.0009456331,0.000047629263,0.00002327598],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014095563,0.00006377942,0.00033448223,0.00035124004,0.001565524,0.00027489956,0.00014279153,0.00018005734,5.0741113e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007950214,0.00028190715,0.023693599,0.00004900247,0.00022004478,5.905471e-8,0.084424675,0.00008586234,0.04082732,0.8285504,0.018206174,0.0035814794],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001088045,0.000606633,0.13037765,0.0011545828,0.00022966243,0.0000064528485,0.37475538,0.0011810444,0.054392856,0.013864584,0.42177156,0.0005715576],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002504521,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008002307,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8146858,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007240998,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000064268344,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.57682383},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W306366585","doi":"","title":"Britain permits controversial genetic test.","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PubMed","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Test (biology); Genetics; Biology; Psychology; Ecology","score_opus":0.015622975241329789,"score_gpt":0.24354805891837783,"score_spread":0.22792508367704803,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W306366585","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.43106323,0.00059455226,0.00009566466,0.025033671,0.0006230868,0.00089226064,0.000009507843,0.00021698882,0.54147106],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98399305,0.00007209303,0.00007412731,0.00053605513,0.0015376348,0.00013281082,7.589116e-7,0.0000052066894,0.013648253],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99919635,0.00004143911,0.00009697249,0.000121749385,0.00022270693,0.0003207543],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996161,0.00009542512,0.000032491887,0.00007599846,0.000039938408,0.00014008627],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003018924,0.00004974636,0.00007054796,0.000031111922,0.00025444524,0.000066827815,0.00011038965,0.00005462066,0.00016083896],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00026321248,0.000053300315,0.000046692832,0.000097304764,0.000087200504,0.00012762655,0.000014954987,0.000053332347,0.000056361994],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006473294,0.000044716617,0.0100637255,0.0000010846137,0.0000062148547,0.0000026621,0.001603543,0.000004278797,0.000011285715,0.0027698816,0.005844022,0.9796421],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021751605,0.0000050891017,0.3153359,6.138982e-7,0.0000070023884,6.462013e-7,0.0001276584,0.000022368444,0.00001349613,0.000088836845,0.68412644,0.000054430846],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006985392,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019688045,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9795877,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010809449,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000039927752,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21735238},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3080640902","doi":"","title":"Share the Wealth? Kerr v Baranow and the \"Joint Family Venture\"","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian journal of family law","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Joint venture; Business; Joint (building); Business administration; Engineering; Structural engineering","score_opus":0.0658104394636366,"score_gpt":0.26196873119723174,"score_spread":0.19615829173359514,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3080640902","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.39004907,0.017472379,0.000048463753,0.028666416,0.0030903518,0.00052164093,0.000043723343,0.000018093706,0.5600898],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9934664,0.00048819114,0.000024377112,0.005200594,0.00047461022,0.0000025008044,4.377948e-7,0.000008024951,0.00033487013],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988825,0.00022259177,0.00026472722,0.00008454173,0.00024592807,0.00029973293],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99897,0.0000733935,0.00017827218,0.00014270587,0.00017380623,0.00046184458],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013582151,0.00008594239,0.00016384841,0.00005689625,0.0011349367,0.00013426726,0.00034297793,0.000074453375,0.00016355288],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007623341,0.00004925056,0.00011298189,0.0001322964,0.0010512718,0.00017011046,0.000011758862,0.0002948324,0.000010770571],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009264009,0.000014999074,0.0015996675,0.000010784337,0.0001017125,0.00011772759,0.10314643,0.0000025671302,0.00007395996,0.8568748,0.022909803,0.015054877],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005691899,0.000063639935,0.051338166,0.00005495611,0.000043153068,0.00002202544,0.010995688,0.00000685348,0.000010606759,0.006172083,0.93063366,0.00008995969],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.17532742,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.27008247,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9077239,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000882866,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008852362,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.87291306},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3082016325","doi":"","title":"With Great Advantage Should Come Responsibility: How the Territorialist Approach in Private International Law Maybe Overcome to Ensure Justice is Done for those Left in the Wake of Canadian Business Abroad","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Wake; Economic Justice; Political science; Business; Engineering","score_opus":0.036242820470721346,"score_gpt":0.32300708028986314,"score_spread":0.2867642598191418,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3082016325","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.57841593,0.00060215406,0.00024382622,0.12057731,0.010420058,0.01057166,0.0030277707,0.00014349808,0.27599776],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9882787,0.00013618603,0.00080551207,0.0029805296,0.0017017883,0.00026788053,0.0010052486,0.00005629557,0.0047678486],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973192,0.00036116215,0.00043534423,0.0005483588,0.0009050952,0.0004308055],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983958,0.00033010397,0.00023719225,0.0004685411,0.00035949604,0.0002088456],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016764242,0.00030071952,0.0004440884,0.0002810141,0.0005017399,0.00039260185,0.0010019831,0.00037083923,0.00007878482],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00037795506,0.00021232221,0.000109183886,0.00097083615,0.0001987202,0.00035009623,0.000039767776,0.0006408288,0.0000028408963],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.004774401,0.00038599712,0.0142500065,0.0010077821,0.00024056702,0.00008331168,0.17064084,0.00033098794,0.0005221496,0.80089784,0.0057890625,0.0010770373],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00093621074,0.000094914954,0.034251798,0.0003119475,0.00013308412,0.0000028452075,0.018862575,0.000054129927,0.000060975184,0.0005665715,0.9443435,0.0003814647],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4603508,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9373839,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9385544,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00038459778,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006112595,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8658248},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3084677261","doi":"","title":"Research Guides: The Law of Canada: Case Law","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"libguides","venue":"","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.14241118086900328,"score_gpt":0.41229647680230685,"score_spread":0.26988529593330357,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3084677261","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00020876777,0.0012109455,0.0000012237421,0.017331619,0.0012211795,0.00033578562,0.00009827046,0.000030322028,0.97956187],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.22504988,0.00062769226,0.00007296961,0.0026862393,0.004321565,0.000042641026,0.000039516515,0.000045068376,0.76711446],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963886,0.0006272305,0.00036110636,0.00023396593,0.001884399,0.0005046932],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971756,0.00070542813,0.00012646656,0.0004464266,0.001342385,0.00020370721],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005910302,0.00012779665,0.00026126864,0.000052696523,0.0014781401,0.00011697525,0.00060720753,0.0002838608,0.0009301873],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003014989,0.00008493683,0.000073771014,0.00034471578,0.001368469,0.000092429036,0.0001536874,0.00051703316,0.00001006929],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000023832897,0.000005953295,0.000001076461,0.000010589425,0.000014847598,0.000094873656,0.0021506783,5.6557707e-7,2.7536913e-7,0.43133718,0.56606674,0.00031483168],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006254461,0.000029213335,0.0000015364258,0.000036634046,0.000015588937,0.000019241232,0.017692197,0.000002900354,0.000014629414,0.0031649747,0.97885877,0.00010179964],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9994313,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.999815,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4281722,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00049167546,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0064744796,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999831},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3084767512","doi":"10.1136/bmj.m3581","title":"Canadian court says wife cannot block husband’s medically assisted death","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"BMJ","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Wife; Block (permutation group theory); Medicine; Computer science; Law; Political science; Combinatorics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.049104593026200086,"score_gpt":0.325819374373972,"score_spread":0.27671478134777194,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3084767512","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.044280574,0.00008420105,0.000054287782,0.44606194,0.0005749713,0.0003433221,0.000030508365,0.00013638173,0.5084338],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9886397,0.00002909026,0.000116066534,0.0059997495,0.0013843802,0.000012003506,0.000008504664,0.00000889958,0.0038015652],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99878526,0.00008626175,0.00018267296,0.00017559122,0.0004434476,0.00032676238],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988742,0.000041609277,0.00005465966,0.000100389625,0.000089394474,0.0008397683],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00044865563,0.00007694442,0.00012500198,0.000036198002,0.00045220592,0.00007205138,0.00019494754,0.00011707275,0.0007764386],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00034816054,0.00007657192,0.000053026237,0.0002095955,0.00007312202,0.00006509192,0.0000178298,0.00012782338,0.000117608324],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028761411,0.000035138037,0.024627585,0.000012497724,0.00006718694,0.00017782314,0.022156747,0.000010814243,0.00014865561,0.017338928,0.9139629,0.021432985],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017426215,0.000034565688,0.03230474,0.000010562576,0.00001590746,0.0000022332692,0.0006001727,0.00012126957,0.000008238808,0.0000515335,0.9665674,0.00010909166],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6002914,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8111791,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9443592,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019373088,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016556261,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8501459},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W308696149","doi":"","title":"Challenge of Jurisdiction: Van Breda v. Village Resorts Ltd. and Black v. Breeden","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Plaintiff; Law; Subject-matter jurisdiction; Common law; Political science; Appeal; Discretion; Original jurisdiction","score_opus":0.01980215187143085,"score_gpt":0.26419970146889193,"score_spread":0.24439754959746107,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W308696149","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6364115,0.00596763,0.000977329,0.00331692,0.00047931378,0.00025339884,0.0000032065875,0.00007963202,0.35251108],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9716712,0.024836209,0.00003231352,0.000030230007,0.00053705863,0.0000016619399,5.63276e-7,0.000013641044,0.002877103],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978764,0.00014431408,0.00029196567,0.00017529793,0.0003723595,0.0011396591],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99935776,0.000027907088,0.00021288797,0.00013022535,0.00012920891,0.00014199193],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020230964,0.00011418142,0.00018102545,0.000116139556,0.0004567673,0.000035386933,0.00019165811,0.0001285265,0.00028986152],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003237313,0.00010934541,0.00009304796,0.0001622452,0.00028251036,0.00027753104,0.000033952267,0.0006766209,0.000013803763],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015234922,0.00019164679,0.0060464684,0.000014186795,0.00020739733,0.000011875652,0.05345748,0.0000011100524,0.00019751862,0.8064233,0.0003000506,0.13299663],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016610344,0.0019890594,0.018084489,0.00008876616,0.000172882,0.00021530253,0.039387546,0.000026969052,0.0002039125,0.62283844,0.3147743,0.00055730814],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016649768,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010678278,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.349634,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002685346,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00088944036,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.595873},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W309291630","doi":"","title":"Conflict of Laws Trends - Torts","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Institutional Repository at DePaul University (DePaul University)","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Conflict of laws; Law; Law and economics; Political science; Economics","score_opus":0.046433706895241886,"score_gpt":0.2495112546030284,"score_spread":0.20307754770778652,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W309291630","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.64371014,0.000060758095,0.00014842485,0.000533101,0.0004847914,0.0000954388,0.000020670606,0.00009057396,0.35485607],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8985811,0.00008923474,0.000059070797,0.00004190783,0.00019434643,9.370063e-8,0.00001699487,0.0000061478795,0.10101109],"study_design_codex":"case_report","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99818146,0.00034127085,0.0001685664,0.0003056242,0.00070079096,0.00030231304],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99861836,0.00012027065,0.00021108025,0.00033097313,0.0003902225,0.0003290766],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004255101,0.00016417215,0.00021835962,0.0003335181,0.0022127526,0.000030029421,0.0006650455,0.0001850619,0.00011372088],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000046907597,0.00016862666,0.00019630944,0.0008741672,0.0010175834,0.0006342312,0.00026049934,0.00019049362,0.000030069134],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0049438463,0.0010958698,0.0024285573,0.00006331048,0.001127305,0.77991974,0.005316317,0.0053236745,0.0039586322,0.18795711,0.0013428975,0.006522726],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00084705633,0.00008146757,0.0036587908,0.000020361476,0.00013009067,0.0029232348,0.0048525124,0.000056671517,0.00037025602,0.00007742625,0.98677266,0.00020949851],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0059845583,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030645651,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98542976,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001375028,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009368181,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99908626},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3093419797","doi":"10.3917/rcdip.202.0215","title":"Le règlement 2019/1111, Bruxelles II : la protection des enfants gagne du ter(rain)","year":2020,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue critique de droit international privé","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Art; Philosophy","score_opus":0.023982317835573693,"score_gpt":0.2958343540158824,"score_spread":0.2718520361803087,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3093419797","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23936448,0.0032520439,0.05387227,0.49904752,0.003203085,0.0012079328,0.00025922296,0.00030100695,0.19949244],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9736722,0.004504207,0.0013265398,0.0016487092,0.0038663838,0.0001028424,0.000054484797,0.000041551662,0.014783076],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99789983,0.00030678182,0.00047946343,0.00046186475,0.00042945865,0.00042260892],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988796,0.00013475258,0.00019557594,0.00014463086,0.00035727076,0.00028817006],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008671747,0.00021789952,0.00024304185,0.000093141025,0.00069391204,0.0002341662,0.00048181473,0.0002644202,0.0012094578],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005821407,0.00029968706,0.00021729957,0.00025872103,0.00043737737,0.0006645756,0.0001923444,0.00040318334,0.00012479158],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009182632,0.00042212292,0.0008538899,0.00019808229,0.00013873819,0.00007339909,0.022355981,0.00008404152,0.0022218686,0.84952337,0.0066776015,0.11735909],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006297012,0.00025169388,0.0028290616,0.00043577093,0.00004477745,0.00007994818,0.0012657495,0.003451072,0.0009972774,0.031694323,0.9579909,0.0003297407],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0045012636,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012108044,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95131326,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005265641,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00037694137,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999455},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3096476607","doi":"","title":"FACL Ontario Podcast: Race and Identity in the Law, Part 1","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Race (biology); Identity (music); Sociology; Gender studies; Law; Political science; Genealogy; History; Art","score_opus":0.03004997721602811,"score_gpt":0.2959063701529974,"score_spread":0.26585639293696933,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3096476607","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8122845,0.0003209855,0.000032852797,0.02342475,0.00030472604,0.00029739185,0.0000069868265,0.00006229659,0.16326545],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9919213,0.000082461,0.000043469787,0.0057148477,0.00044900365,0.000012391648,0.0000033748595,0.0000060326406,0.0017671314],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988019,0.00018224685,0.00017081463,0.0002242077,0.00037573863,0.00024508275],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999539,0.000070135546,0.000051021812,0.00013889559,0.000031251053,0.00016966251],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00069281075,0.000089799214,0.00013702932,0.000012155536,0.0005373979,0.00033835665,0.0002588891,0.00007951178,0.00082935096],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000739131,0.000075456795,0.00004837658,0.00020584441,0.00020670876,0.00063046446,0.00006224258,0.0002852572,0.00014364696],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003611506,0.00006486347,0.055202294,0.000012720496,0.000016947834,0.00003566966,0.08869256,0.000006577627,0.000084233885,0.849128,0.0053984355,0.0013215691],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025464664,0.00003640315,0.02591724,0.000011765466,0.000010424745,0.0000011134183,0.0029933183,0.000006105061,0.000015042609,0.0021527945,0.9684987,0.00010241743],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3597141,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9193794,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9631003,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007798703,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009664344,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9080812},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3099391973","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198850397.001.0001","title":"Comparative Succession Law","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Estate; Law; Civil law (Civil law); Entitlement (fair division); Common law; Comparative law; Family law; Political science; Statutory law; Public law; Economics","score_opus":0.06290376510184068,"score_gpt":0.35612895398715216,"score_spread":0.29322518888531146,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3099391973","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000004609223,0.0001356349,0.000049010538,0.0028834692,0.0003984222,0.00018497714,0.000007635323,0.00015529004,0.99618095],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.005993992,0.00012183093,0.00004881979,0.001028379,0.0011771806,0.0000039756173,0.00004085812,0.00000858329,0.9915764],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999119,0.000056865112,0.00013436514,0.00019481166,0.00035981473,0.00013518537],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999566,0.00006511885,0.000085773296,0.00008310541,0.00006917386,0.00013080533],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000120823235,0.000109781984,0.00023688443,0.000022038419,0.00042209384,0.000086947235,0.00017094036,0.00021888355,0.0036516301],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000054673405,0.000097359705,0.000085366155,0.000046998113,0.00023155904,0.00010308048,0.0000415345,0.00020892214,0.00070225686],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000039250617,0.0000046896926,0.0000017291579,0.000004370461,0.000010539742,0.0000022206752,0.0056400616,1.0676739e-7,0.0000020661003,0.7321324,0.26155266,0.0006452495],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000056014724,0.000023662054,0.000007202243,0.00003262474,0.000015643345,7.701704e-8,0.00033420997,0.000004905973,0.000010580017,0.008382133,0.99100673,0.00012622442],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021466874,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009268428,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.72945404,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012543151,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003941504,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99725914},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W310650258","doi":"","title":"Intellectual Property Litigation in Australia","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Defense Counsel Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Jurisdiction; Intellectual property; Common law; Jurisprudence; Political science","score_opus":0.08291134681595079,"score_gpt":0.32407302064554006,"score_spread":0.24116167382958925,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W310650258","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9839552,0.00010495424,0.000280062,0.0011441449,0.00049955945,0.00009933636,0.000001071142,0.000029447283,0.013886192],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9892201,0.0013543845,0.00010109785,0.00014668697,0.0005711346,0.0000028938296,0.0000012419721,0.0000063750263,0.008596101],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987584,0.00018565333,0.0002444795,0.00010822962,0.00043076326,0.00027249043],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994535,0.00008257373,0.00007762818,0.000063849046,0.00018352781,0.00013891028],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008524495,0.00007417784,0.000105272185,0.00012206525,0.00063562463,0.00008471662,0.000115645955,0.00008774961,0.0009176365],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00025305088,0.00005662977,0.00006138535,0.0002629774,0.00019230551,0.0002842264,0.000006170941,0.00031801593,0.00013291655],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003518489,0.00041772268,0.055572227,0.000013671733,0.000058456106,0.0009311958,0.7735211,0.000113302725,0.0014688381,0.0074743936,0.12566644,0.034410775],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00055659894,0.000098503886,0.01671439,0.000047981343,0.00000834676,0.0004725913,0.003090055,0.000086312786,0.00007410529,0.0017040559,0.97696006,0.00018701842],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015238224,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014837252,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8512936,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016338725,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00027548324,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99999565},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3108699951","doi":"","title":"Facilitating Money Judgment Enforcement Between Canada and the United States","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Enforcement; Commission; Jurisdiction; Conflict of laws; Law; Statute; Convention; Political science; Treaty; Negotiation; Business; State (computer science); Personal jurisdiction; Choice of law","score_opus":0.024497266980014486,"score_gpt":0.2634825255529577,"score_spread":0.23898525857294323,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3108699951","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9450424,0.00024977422,0.00019754263,0.0330318,0.00015994733,0.000470526,0.000065062464,0.00007914422,0.020703824],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9940644,0.0001225544,0.00006406856,0.0048292805,0.0002542494,0.000016930675,0.000036086298,0.0000061735254,0.00060627615],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987414,0.00018190409,0.00021334649,0.0001731256,0.00043506248,0.00025515357],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99913543,0.00034516427,0.00007074051,0.00009963671,0.00006040777,0.00028859178],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00050339353,0.00009583917,0.00014655414,0.000013147301,0.00077336235,0.00013441069,0.00015531838,0.00003575866,0.0002662365],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018101001,0.00007323913,0.000031368963,0.00019609464,0.00021468193,0.00010454244,0.00006323794,0.00015740264,0.000012014554],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024860294,0.00003602741,0.050051313,0.000115630275,0.00039317567,0.000020561029,0.20475729,0.0018733505,0.00010243307,0.693484,0.02891396,0.02000367],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00067855197,0.00003603418,0.0011675917,0.00001235645,0.000025123949,8.186485e-8,0.01370054,0.0005228773,0.000052776682,0.00061816076,0.98306584,0.00012006161],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97324526,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8375482,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95415187,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000114508526,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018742078,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5948156},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3112206666","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198799986.013.17","title":"Diffusion, Reception, and Transplantation","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"reference-entry","venue":"","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Process (computing); Field (mathematics); Political science; Reflection (computer programming); Transplantation; Law and economics; Sociology; Engineering ethics; Computer science; Engineering; Medicine","score_opus":0.029354913957907118,"score_gpt":0.2974978804223531,"score_spread":0.26814296646444596,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3112206666","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00099689,0.0009683698,0.00058640627,0.0065713963,0.0009090528,0.00022549003,0.00004267937,0.00014845573,0.98955125],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.007667829,0.73112714,0.00015100007,0.00047568322,0.0018294371,0.000013791232,0.0003515789,0.000016126214,0.25836742],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99901396,0.00009520938,0.00016832272,0.00024282762,0.00033165357,0.00014805462],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99960023,0.000054389275,0.000074995085,0.000062864856,0.00006662372,0.00014087018],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00014069187,0.00011593227,0.00016894737,0.000054558677,0.00038316782,0.00010249814,0.00008683769,0.00029622676,0.0018459412],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000029574163,0.00010531835,0.00004735325,0.00012597337,0.00009556137,0.00010281079,0.000013947923,0.00019367583,0.000060913735],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025543304,0.000024627483,0.00038515293,0.00017713477,0.000024202713,0.0000056356835,0.02037652,5.419278e-8,0.000003139225,0.016859671,0.37143853,0.59067976],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001347348,0.000024596306,0.0014701417,0.00008675914,0.000047849804,9.4621015e-7,0.0007172924,0.000004419191,0.000001704615,0.0005643858,0.99681103,0.00013614968],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032243724,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035012779,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7311838,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004131095,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015984541,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99906653},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3112238147","doi":"","title":"Guides: Quebec Law: Ressources par domaine de droit","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"libguides","venue":"","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law","score_opus":0.019052418890344553,"score_gpt":0.2850354195976615,"score_spread":0.26598300070731695,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3112238147","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020988835,0.0027660353,0.0004400783,0.019812958,0.0061259074,0.000628944,0.00007823305,0.00029476965,0.9488642],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.077673025,0.00284981,0.00073692965,0.0053390395,0.008028102,0.00003498787,0.00011073704,0.000082801795,0.9051446],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99556774,0.0004712526,0.000910826,0.0008238659,0.001038386,0.0011879063],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974218,0.0006388324,0.0005365874,0.0006731116,0.00031238876,0.00041726473],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017728927,0.0005457914,0.0008446067,0.00014655026,0.0014361795,0.00054428197,0.0010266082,0.001057737,0.0141411815],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017205715,0.00055351807,0.0005166028,0.00036468057,0.0023309838,0.00055710506,0.00014925639,0.00063286145,0.002115059],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025813752,0.0001049027,0.00055529067,0.00017062601,0.0001742423,0.000022941611,0.031123167,0.000018879638,0.00006538116,0.800601,0.153289,0.013848734],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003715388,0.00013530758,0.0004271152,0.00041497633,0.00019128568,0.000006021708,0.004896033,0.00007710852,0.00013666436,0.015307726,0.97734207,0.000694129],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.619488,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.56321275,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8240531,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009431834,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00075029494,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998638},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3113891289","doi":"10.5937/gakv0404106k","title":"Regulatory activities of the European Union and other states in the international community: The tripartite relationship in the field of private international law","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Glasnik Advokatske komore Vojvodine","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Atomic Energy (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"European union; Law; Political science; European Union law; International law; Conflict of laws; Private law; Legislation; Sources of law; Common law; Public law; Normative; Business; International trade","score_opus":0.02795281383796602,"score_gpt":0.304417219093294,"score_spread":0.276464405255328,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3113891289","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9175293,0.000054916316,0.000036739468,0.037098568,0.00022870256,0.00024344864,0.00001824739,0.000009108954,0.044781],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983605,0.00006336063,0.000018493762,0.0012573448,0.0001153091,0.000010270955,0.000006945455,0.0000064438777,0.00016129376],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99754345,0.0015289728,0.00028425222,0.00008800507,0.0004369067,0.00011843703],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998452,0.0010044666,0.00018773174,0.0002979915,0.000044969023,0.00001285165],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004299562,0.0000818179,0.00009307916,0.000069767666,0.0003538789,0.000061343904,0.0008261881,0.00004185757,0.000023336377],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023931725,0.000042088224,0.000053467513,0.00028251237,0.0005703326,0.00018117958,0.00012161707,0.00036673184,8.601121e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006577043,0.00027936153,0.11662856,0.000015041465,0.00003893324,0.0000022607785,0.19768927,0.00036638847,0.0004921348,0.6793496,0.00048099458,0.0045916736],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011713778,0.000085585416,0.7353021,0.00018596707,0.000022698478,0.000006098506,0.042078543,0.000057945064,0.00081532,0.032544173,0.1876048,0.00012541632],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008445921,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.028311038,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.64680547,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000456271,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000040294628,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9981569},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3117032328","doi":"","title":"LA COMPÉTENCE INTERNATIONALE INDIRECTE ET LA SOUMISSION AU TRIBUNAL ÉTRANGER SELON LA COUR SUPRÊME DU CANADA APRÈS L’ARRÊT BARER C KNIGHT BROTHERS","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"CONTEST; Tribunal; Jurisdiction; Supreme court; Law; Plaintiff; Political science; Humanities; Knight; Philosophy","score_opus":0.022042963572016495,"score_gpt":0.2678361889028034,"score_spread":0.24579322533078693,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3117032328","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08864002,0.12496021,0.000014052144,0.37666038,0.0025168094,0.0018557108,0.00051287224,0.000053467098,0.40478647],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8396479,0.077930585,0.000032687574,0.010616275,0.00051495247,0.00003707504,0.000060303475,0.000051895408,0.07110833],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962557,0.0019133593,0.00036157193,0.00031267776,0.00062685425,0.00052983756],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981898,0.00057932903,0.00017276908,0.00029257772,0.0001608272,0.00060468336],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030452423,0.00024995123,0.0003990714,0.00006332785,0.00058302836,0.00014806211,0.00057844585,0.00019840029,0.0060808603],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015555881,0.00020405011,0.00016077935,0.00039530965,0.00033367757,0.00020008892,0.000034315326,0.0005048043,0.00031918223],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035959896,0.00012177071,0.025878305,0.0024410177,0.00043925978,0.00034319994,0.021202521,0.000071612405,0.00004591369,0.45606315,0.2430604,0.2502969],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021924973,0.00001611538,0.014120582,0.0025822325,0.00008790325,0.00005714574,0.00016253181,0.000064553555,0.0000030124015,0.00011881054,0.9823119,0.0002559512],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9846161,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99699074,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.75100785,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014362816,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0069129895,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987169},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3117068828","doi":"10.31436/iiumlj.v28i2.575","title":"DETERMINATION OF A CHILD’S HABITUAL RESIDENCE IN INTERNATIONAL CHILD ABDUCTION CASES: CHARTING THE WAY TOWARDS HARMONIZATION","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"IIUM Law Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Residence; Harmonization; Convention; Law; European union; Convention on the Rights of the Child; Political science; Jurisprudence; Psychology; Sociology; Business; Human rights; International trade; Demography","score_opus":0.02993824471647548,"score_gpt":0.30355966327036743,"score_spread":0.27362141855389194,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3117068828","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5578433,0.0004822541,0.015213632,0.3488126,0.0034015016,0.0006232311,0.000016738142,0.00009871269,0.07350799],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99743456,0.00018906406,0.0001778394,0.0006407249,0.0015211607,0.000003432146,0.0000029515552,0.000006617883,0.00002365418],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99866056,0.00017949936,0.00036423677,0.00012593203,0.0005160882,0.00015367514],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993057,0.00005327028,0.00029735093,0.000056964458,0.00021093528,0.00007577559],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00091688434,0.00007053158,0.00009871079,0.00006415137,0.00078303844,0.00014626251,0.00022867831,0.000059840535,0.0001624864],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000533047,0.000058724272,0.00006323755,0.00026625488,0.00014082389,0.0006148525,0.000033474196,0.00029022692,0.000004598681],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005153322,0.0003497649,0.016967189,0.000056831377,0.00007884375,0.00016063993,0.3399748,0.0010431145,0.0033872388,0.17272209,0.0008436234,0.46390054],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005071495,0.0010713048,0.20433095,0.0015613079,0.00019207402,0.0014392034,0.0709932,0.038803734,0.012284877,0.006562429,0.6564303,0.0012591284],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019886175,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004143468,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.65558666,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000105315376,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005437738,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6022578},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3118179374","doi":"10.25313/2520-2308-2020-11-6521","title":"INHERITANCE BY CONTRACT IN PRIVATE INTERNATION LAW","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International scientific journal Internauka Series Juridical Sciences","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Inheritance (genetic algorithm); Statute; Legislature; Conflict of laws; Law; Element (criminal law); Political science; Property (philosophy); Law and economics; Private law; Estate; Sociology; Comparative law; Epistemology; Biology","score_opus":0.03258722145211966,"score_gpt":0.3618706701168974,"score_spread":0.3292834486647777,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3118179374","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.66712594,0.00023188097,0.00045028454,0.044047963,0.01415397,0.00020115102,0.000028614857,0.000063326705,0.27369684],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9886466,0.00043492296,0.00023116833,0.00035482415,0.0008037797,0.000010562537,0.0000051063134,0.000010364135,0.009502672],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960031,0.0001884957,0.00067771587,0.00055629225,0.0019312884,0.0006430882],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99823654,0.00010831026,0.00069706084,0.00028728158,0.00034138424,0.00032941013],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0045281867,0.00019594772,0.00023333525,0.00023208931,0.0044715144,0.008464761,0.0033315748,0.00013424076,0.0017082418],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010206825,0.00017319722,0.00015479139,0.00022211994,0.004748183,0.0050275186,0.00024207502,0.0005173223,0.00008373601],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025546274,0.00049568433,0.0675631,0.00000683904,0.00008610992,0.00021417995,0.008831183,0.00003474458,0.010226675,0.8322812,0.015236484,0.06476838],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004908937,0.000093910945,0.009143845,0.00017424325,0.0000056611393,0.000052700925,0.0007519191,0.00028279435,0.0017343513,0.02008478,0.9669238,0.00026110976],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006130825,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021180533,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9516873,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004425846,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002565082,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99920434},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3118739551","doi":"","title":"The \"Family\"—and \"Families\" in Law: A Review of Archana Parashar and Franscesca Dominello, The Family In Law","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Canadian journal of family law","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Family law; Law; Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.0634057558751246,"score_gpt":0.3427713802528224,"score_spread":0.2793656243776978,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3118739551","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00043023194,0.9544379,0.0000019211075,0.0009736226,0.00059390673,0.0008242904,0.00007288799,0.000003873581,0.04266136],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0033650193,0.9929659,0.00001899124,0.0030548393,0.00041665402,0.000024770103,0.0000043544997,0.000032956486,0.0001165474],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9959296,0.001018786,0.0015385544,0.0003141298,0.0005329597,0.00066599314],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99710476,0.00080904254,0.0008635574,0.0003947065,0.00026655148,0.00056136586],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004805603,0.0003822727,0.0015828495,0.00024851866,0.0007489689,0.00019623146,0.00091797503,0.00032827645,0.000017711918],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018047645,0.00024070095,0.00038298365,0.0006699103,0.0039807362,0.0002340003,0.000046248282,0.00090265594,0.000005491912],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035976544,0.000043772427,0.00014938679,0.014128538,0.00030576147,0.00026278305,0.0075039486,5.677549e-7,0.000003202896,0.5754876,0.01228916,0.38978928],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028531018,0.00008595935,0.00024057817,0.039453443,0.00021695318,0.000025066296,0.0010377576,8.1312163e-7,1.2733908e-7,0.0010885785,0.9573307,0.00023468406],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.31918737,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7872288,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9450416,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00028918867,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002316016,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987299},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3118831414","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3753032","title":"First Comes Marriage, Then Comes Baby, Then Comes What Exactly?","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Legalization; Repeal; Political science; Population; Decriminalization; Adultery; Law; Sociology; Gender studies","score_opus":0.02039003108676344,"score_gpt":0.2750722255484602,"score_spread":0.25468219446169676,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3118831414","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5239938,0.03715245,0.0036398948,0.37261045,0.0033664517,0.0012153436,0.000019922853,0.0006391597,0.057362534],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94228184,0.05166947,0.000029244957,0.0014305986,0.001560783,0.000006875731,0.000004619931,0.00003210654,0.0029844579],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961583,0.00031226178,0.00038942308,0.0002899991,0.00072733336,0.0021227095],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988531,0.0002480149,0.0002592288,0.00018433086,0.0001218867,0.00033346948],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002019211,0.00023584618,0.00036073307,0.000093141985,0.0015109744,0.000725481,0.00071381696,0.00015199932,0.0008287883],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001482907,0.00020124683,0.00025986426,0.0003392547,0.0002241475,0.0010996204,0.00008825914,0.0014836038,0.00013107952],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00034008495,0.00025264453,0.024976969,0.000037085465,0.000961395,0.000038471917,0.090919025,0.000082827726,0.00015307774,0.71725756,0.00634926,0.15863161],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001298004,0.0005059992,0.004418104,0.00007426729,0.00010351832,0.00005394448,0.076988325,0.00014479166,0.000033611388,0.09131502,0.8245887,0.00047569541],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00091248174,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007313631,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.81823945,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006693827,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015502885,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99978894},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3120180655","doi":"","title":"로마법상 uti possidetis 법리의 근대 국제법에서의 원용 :민족자결 원칙과의 경합을 중심으로","year":2017,"lang":"ko","type":"article","venue":"한양법학","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Doctrine; Adjudication; Secession; Political science; Law; Context (archaeology); Frontier; International law; Independence (probability theory); Comparative law; Geography","score_opus":0.04045460487685131,"score_gpt":0.3535061560512428,"score_spread":0.3130515511743915,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3120180655","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.39264897,0.0016932861,0.00009977936,0.035147734,0.00704145,0.0005592486,0.00008425914,0.00020896796,0.56251633],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.949484,0.0016492114,0.00011206369,0.0005018727,0.0028510015,0.000013946529,0.000007851333,0.000033340977,0.04534673],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99707896,0.00017688778,0.00046916888,0.0006183521,0.00082130416,0.0008353251],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99769217,0.00011584818,0.0005296653,0.0010676791,0.0001918136,0.0004028212],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010060831,0.00031453103,0.00042179888,0.00008775507,0.0040209545,0.0013296686,0.0011143835,0.0004236333,0.0034972443],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003187566,0.00031956797,0.00030819775,0.0001648616,0.00085265044,0.0008158228,0.00030734902,0.00039345195,0.0021862888],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012009188,0.00043981924,0.071431994,0.000093621085,0.00024129373,0.00019370079,0.033970326,0.000003336376,0.0007419883,0.07494169,0.050512884,0.76730925],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00047871764,0.00016547227,0.20678888,0.00011974418,0.000096115975,0.000005145629,0.0014571087,0.00014095377,0.0002725921,0.0038473124,0.7861574,0.0004705316],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02109493,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010280822,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7668387,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016156424,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00031092178,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999256},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3120281924","doi":"10.2307/j.ctv1d5nkwc.8","title":"Canada and Cross-Cumulation in Rules of Origin","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of Ottawa Press eBooks","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rules of origin; Economics; International economics","score_opus":0.02933597654221995,"score_gpt":0.25910012048431846,"score_spread":0.22976414394209851,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3120281924","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03130147,0.00015234416,0.000009833536,0.00002936984,0.0000833346,0.000109588545,0.000081293976,0.0000067335864,0.968226],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.27485618,0.00019342989,0.00009127025,0.000009615478,0.00004309636,5.4174595e-8,0.000017286544,0.000007547623,0.7247815],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993809,0.000024046674,0.00012623063,0.00014209124,0.0002407513,0.000085964166],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99949175,0.0000524744,0.00017633587,0.00009838081,0.00013525832,0.00004579483],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00012050232,0.00007642449,0.00019449933,0.000060216087,0.00010249421,0.00001123191,0.000108563225,0.00015547469,0.000105142244],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000009045506,0.000103068116,0.00003996365,0.00000461458,0.00028467344,0.00004895823,0.00005155367,0.000097471086,1.4621322e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015266809,0.0000050163853,0.0016635804,0.000060534167,0.000030047624,0.00002851819,0.0027418158,0.000013404738,0.000013362032,0.9899316,0.00030960474,0.005187291],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022056734,0.00000940241,0.0035018092,0.00011151147,0.000024025063,2.419752e-7,0.000113452814,0.000011607177,0.000028915072,0.0006303448,0.99525213,0.0000959766],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9519112,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97302413,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99494255,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010753919,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00061348884,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4202996},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121164040","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3046777","title":"Has the CJPTA Readied Canada for the Hague Choice of Court Convention?","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Convention; Political science","score_opus":0.03748253400218303,"score_gpt":0.3245374225245528,"score_spread":0.28705488852236977,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121164040","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.30923226,0.011700246,0.009769802,0.6125732,0.0067923274,0.0020478026,0.000044495297,0.000046287623,0.04779357],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9892616,0.0016447506,0.000003729755,0.000114129725,0.00082350645,0.000004155115,6.542205e-7,0.0000062642152,0.008141186],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985179,0.00007658126,0.00017292575,0.000079223595,0.00032763788,0.00082575],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99890673,0.0002717957,0.00035357638,0.00024130635,0.00018225302,0.00004436203],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028282516,0.000062524676,0.00009671081,0.000012485991,0.0046892106,0.00019953013,0.0006817583,0.000038300575,0.00004071905],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003701076,0.000036392717,0.0000996534,0.00003527999,0.00030790723,0.00012535027,0.000021934733,0.0004903058,9.796698e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000065082204,0.00003289777,0.0045372304,0.0000047407375,0.00033862653,6.554763e-7,0.0029952151,0.000014132784,0.00008363745,0.93418056,0.010695895,0.04705134],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004921338,0.00008207937,0.014117133,0.000012903592,0.00008475561,0.000009195743,0.0079966495,0.0001068525,0.000040205206,0.03615449,0.94082755,0.000076070326],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.71380067,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9884371,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9301316,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00043906565,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006868817,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987613},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121191412","doi":"","title":"Family and Legal Succession in Romania - A Conclusion","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Romanian; Civil code; Stress (linguistics); Scope (computer science); Order (exchange); Law; Political science; Subject (documents); State (computer science); Code (set theory); Family law; Civil law (Civil law); Civil procedure; Legal history; Sociology; Set (abstract data type); Public law; Linguistics; Computer science; Business; Philosophy","score_opus":0.011707355357134429,"score_gpt":0.31185194206437894,"score_spread":0.30014458670724453,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121191412","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9640613,0.0013270217,0.00013325554,0.004202744,0.00026266777,0.00007444863,3.3262953e-7,0.000013158442,0.029925022],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98834604,0.008689402,0.000010585498,0.00005511366,0.00035652815,0.0000011992275,3.0987e-7,0.0000056687672,0.0025351716],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99844426,0.000091446076,0.00013977071,0.00011916964,0.00024898787,0.0009563962],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996204,0.000020605097,0.00014218153,0.000101745696,0.00003801032,0.000077066165],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021571647,0.00006638247,0.00010181085,0.00006412643,0.0020012795,0.00032544875,0.00024051857,0.000076580465,0.000017960914],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000080503574,0.000058828107,0.000033428256,0.00004057823,0.0001278825,0.000599808,0.000066075445,0.00072915765,0.000004681819],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006447274,0.00005076316,0.041981447,0.000002279233,0.00001641179,0.000024197276,0.0022790702,6.3102044e-7,0.001858915,0.8129439,0.00006388574,0.14071405],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0026823713,0.00043369655,0.38521704,0.00013442768,0.000028797698,0.00015688165,0.012177751,0.00016189668,0.000036949725,0.17306238,0.42552623,0.0003815698],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014446425,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07724641,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6398815,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00041649694,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010940516,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999298},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121356489","doi":"","title":"The Payoffs and Pitfalls of Laws that Encourage Shared Parenting: Lessons from the Australian Experience","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Law; Family law; Legislature; Population; Political science; Argument (complex analysis); Common law; Sociology; Medicine","score_opus":0.02804136045200981,"score_gpt":0.31121835898828426,"score_spread":0.2831769985362744,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121356489","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9701312,0.0015923075,0.0005571884,0.0241744,0.00035308508,0.000127455,0.000004908693,0.000020025258,0.003039406],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9920133,0.0058764913,0.0000106451325,0.00006509984,0.00040671232,0.0000043183477,0.000001066225,0.0000065297636,0.0016158359],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980041,0.00028205733,0.00019870908,0.00013399015,0.00038318592,0.0009979912],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991347,0.00034416036,0.00022735148,0.00015795465,0.000060927312,0.00007490077],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026123582,0.000088329405,0.00011277935,0.000015416252,0.0015495273,0.00024467788,0.00044954312,0.000058040703,0.000049427632],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016688707,0.00005104485,0.00007477794,0.00009787311,0.0003296382,0.00019382456,0.000040341718,0.00062616664,0.0000027566973],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000056456047,0.000052697742,0.056682136,0.0000023728858,0.00014130688,0.0000010680733,0.06850496,0.000004271006,0.0013616211,0.6871902,0.0008452552,0.18515772],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005768732,0.00017038897,0.07548258,0.00006138149,0.00006404446,0.00001914527,0.12455686,0.00006342424,0.0003662207,0.17314886,0.62524474,0.00024547824],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0045503415,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04085479,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6243995,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000114263676,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00044644054,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997503},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121549881","doi":"","title":"Copyrights, Federalism, and the Constitutionality of Canada's Private Copying Levy","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionality; Copying; Federalism; Political science; Law and economics; Law; Business; Economics; Supreme court","score_opus":0.010743120386991588,"score_gpt":0.24142404904333215,"score_spread":0.23068092865634054,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121549881","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.117369205,0.000461691,0.00015645027,0.014935972,0.0007214028,0.0001800839,0.00004750981,0.00001820671,0.8661095],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991496,0.000071822906,0.00007496907,0.00023226869,0.00022913817,0.0000010380433,9.938265e-7,0.0000023718894,0.00023774827],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989854,0.00016544796,0.0002282915,0.00006817017,0.00038460002,0.00016805505],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99947876,0.00012017787,0.00015491436,0.00005260145,0.0001245953,0.000068929505],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00097078824,0.000055560406,0.00012243653,0.0000117530535,0.0062176213,0.00007465839,0.00009661565,0.000034233246,0.00011190338],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000032953038,0.00003653154,0.000040810504,0.000058501348,0.00082256866,0.00011158174,0.000017400129,0.00012955753,3.4878573e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023323184,0.000008114927,0.0005950503,0.0000022815238,0.000011166262,0.000005314056,0.00010913112,0.00001633224,0.000014243481,0.9982781,0.0007093,0.00022764182],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006064716,0.0000056186936,0.002661072,0.000016630836,0.000013631649,0.00002870724,0.00014253183,0.00002058255,0.00017473433,0.011058612,0.9852167,0.0000547464],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8517678,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9638883,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9872195,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000108474276,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000108824715,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9950761},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121595799","doi":"","title":"Single Family For Sale - 2962 Admiral Court- Coquitlam- British Columbia - Price $1,388,000","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"History; Medicine; Ancient history","score_opus":0.04092890737974705,"score_gpt":0.3121311125659624,"score_spread":0.27120220518621535,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121595799","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4719428,0.00012012242,0.0006927004,0.0023074462,0.0012647025,0.000671078,0.000076717624,0.00020418968,0.5227202],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8638448,0.00007834131,0.0007758013,0.00044035167,0.0007324535,0.00003940099,0.000009768135,0.000016412798,0.13406263],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99874324,0.000037614027,0.0001902389,0.00027184316,0.00033430956,0.00042274792],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99909705,0.00008898922,0.00015288727,0.00029258386,0.00019377096,0.00017474538],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005662589,0.000073803494,0.00017003759,0.000014566033,0.0029990778,0.0025146957,0.00042748207,0.00013831237,0.0014190905],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00025909703,0.00011499121,0.000106941414,0.000049189235,0.0003151347,0.00051230134,0.00006745024,0.00007800424,0.000035207522],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004294676,0.0005211204,0.046812203,0.0000429753,0.000073463474,0.000024532721,0.004947793,9.206859e-7,0.0023117727,0.00950563,0.7334709,0.20224574],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00050147995,0.000119609074,0.0815102,0.00002438983,0.000017740027,0.000001660685,0.0008764354,0.000037842576,0.000031866253,0.0010390087,0.91566366,0.00017608727],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.27428705,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.52884746,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.391902,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009254398,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015666014,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994937},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121730844","doi":"","title":"Forum-Selection Clauses: Beyond the Contracting Parties","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University; Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Selection (genetic algorithm); Test (biology); Database transaction; Political science; Forum shopping; Law; Law and economics; Business; Economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.023693000752775563,"score_gpt":0.30516055780784124,"score_spread":0.28146755705506565,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121730844","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7847601,0.008702303,0.0119825145,0.06697311,0.0030418749,0.00056354934,0.0000015278048,0.00025285364,0.123722166],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9932221,0.0016335059,0.000014315455,0.0003127185,0.0013603258,0.0000062536897,5.3666014e-7,0.000009923779,0.0034403277],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974883,0.00023913887,0.00019959518,0.00010406947,0.00044096567,0.0015279332],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99933964,0.00009772208,0.000171243,0.000070265975,0.00020789441,0.00011325362],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0044576023,0.000083314866,0.00009822924,0.00004717143,0.001400183,0.00022170946,0.00020579327,0.000076616336,0.00003399315],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00028620023,0.000060246137,0.00007872687,0.00019578992,0.00011792904,0.0004531429,0.000015326079,0.0011410543,0.000026882628],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007524009,0.00004310369,0.0076564164,7.37055e-7,0.000096697935,9.706536e-7,0.011940255,0.000065821194,0.000109851295,0.9152286,0.002428779,0.062353533],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004704639,0.00025838392,0.0002564508,0.0000066840153,0.000039864324,0.00010005604,0.108336106,0.00011038327,0.000071236704,0.37304527,0.517174,0.00013111379],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022387558,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04247778,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.54218334,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000973658,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029218278,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99989986},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121759858","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v28i2.4497","title":"Transnational and Comparative Administrative Law: Papers from the Sixth Administrative Law Discussion Forum, Québec City","year":2010,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"Scholarship at UWindsor (University of Windsor)","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor; Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Windsor; Administrative law; Law; Political science; Comparative law; Sociology","score_opus":0.05851439177848305,"score_gpt":0.2978660881579995,"score_spread":0.23935169637951642,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121759858","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.86161816,0.00014879981,0.000021973077,0.0700439,0.00052189745,0.00083017175,0.0010104969,0.000053780546,0.06575084],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9952044,0.000047281046,0.00026894326,0.0005226848,0.0002369534,0.0000024340807,0.0001195826,0.000020190222,0.0035775385],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9953745,0.0009723086,0.0005461042,0.0010568649,0.0013534506,0.00069676316],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962745,0.0013145606,0.00074561575,0.00055144326,0.0004639637,0.0006499301],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012725721,0.00057970016,0.00076707115,0.00009015973,0.006178076,0.0003515949,0.001103476,0.00072748226,0.004761923],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000098537465,0.00047923726,0.00047068828,0.00051097,0.0065601943,0.002309843,0.00031532394,0.0018213047,0.000028384577],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0017610769,0.00058729405,0.046703298,0.000024406943,0.00055837043,0.000028783194,0.20465577,0.0000028483305,0.00994291,0.7339138,0.00018291119,0.0016385588],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0031544613,0.00084785116,0.4507698,0.000115112874,0.0005765685,0.000009455074,0.20156367,0.000051639116,0.0022152173,0.006389203,0.33331957,0.0009874388],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.036565244,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8080762,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.77151096,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002525389,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001262211,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99976593},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122564250","doi":"","title":"A Comparative Study of the Law of Palliative Care and End-of-Life Treatment","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Palliative care; Common law; End-of-life care; Law; Civil law (Civil law); Comparative law; Palliative treatment; Political science; Medicine; Public law; Nursing","score_opus":0.03555414244016503,"score_gpt":0.33989763476743656,"score_spread":0.30434349232727154,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122564250","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98663706,0.0026340578,0.00001794387,0.00008365737,0.00005333492,0.0002157006,0.0000023549767,0.0000018597136,0.010354036],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99860334,0.0012471499,0.0000071260456,0.000004717104,0.000024609617,0.0000024675833,1.191615e-7,0.000002296345,0.00010817738],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.998907,0.00028350297,0.00018752115,0.00006501805,0.00022772937,0.00032920812],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994763,0.00006155727,0.00023740817,0.00006273332,0.00012878465,0.000033231037],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00042246238,0.0000579544,0.0001852709,0.000022126562,0.00024626445,0.0000071123122,0.000078898185,0.000024777353,0.000015005088],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000021013624,0.000037326863,0.000058544425,0.00011717819,0.00018290023,0.00004287848,0.000007636597,0.00018194786,1.3758628e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005404921,0.00036091256,0.060293164,0.000003994786,0.0003036066,1.6262909e-7,0.28755248,0.000018103949,0.00013305008,0.64858407,0.0000019652427,0.002694411],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0024086088,0.004099245,0.022763917,0.00003109603,0.00015889722,0.0000018380323,0.944294,0.000003534163,0.0014454593,0.017869925,0.0068223397,0.00010118806],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004529919,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.087759726,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.65674144,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027749522,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013879319,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9288863},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122860694","doi":"","title":"International Law in Domestic Courts: A Conflict of Laws Approach","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Conflict of laws; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Economics","score_opus":0.025003570827611708,"score_gpt":0.3085897903037968,"score_spread":0.28358621947618506,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122860694","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10283947,0.00025328083,0.00017553821,0.002835702,0.00042170545,0.00029481266,0.000014441003,0.00008408275,0.89308095],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9956491,0.00014096424,0.00063816516,0.00103162,0.00035167628,0.000012329527,0.0000141498485,0.000007627398,0.002154349],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998541,0.000112305075,0.00033242788,0.00023974935,0.0004967109,0.00027783742],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993516,0.00007607124,0.000120859426,0.00018904581,0.00011419663,0.00014821751],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00069311704,0.00011390216,0.0002166083,0.00007521178,0.0001726938,0.00009105032,0.00033870188,0.00012719494,0.00042242653],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009794473,0.00011700285,0.00008388397,0.0002075139,0.0002720637,0.00034121642,0.000028099515,0.00020723483,0.0000399122],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003465647,0.00019874341,0.0009241822,0.0000057986767,0.000013330461,0.00001081071,0.0020944513,0.000046698486,0.00030815974,0.9938369,0.0003747663,0.0021515007],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00089134334,0.000084436055,0.0066522616,0.00005141856,0.000013307063,0.000005630619,0.0005920106,0.00016378412,0.00009699532,0.008647,0.98260975,0.00019203682],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011966046,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004859311,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9851899,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013499106,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000874682,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99461335},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123216792","doi":"10.1017/s0069005800009280","title":"Weaving a Tangled Web:<i>Hape</i>and the Obfuscation of Canadian Reception Law","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Yearbook of international Law/Annuaire canadien de droit international","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Common law; Charter; Supreme court","score_opus":0.010895082368999491,"score_gpt":0.22941838449610846,"score_spread":0.21852330212710896,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123216792","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18693045,0.00013213091,0.000024920151,0.016248297,0.0011610992,0.0003397217,0.0003617182,0.000023621613,0.79477805],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9909287,0.00038380935,0.00018161797,0.0014902198,0.0004611168,0.00003300597,0.00008526458,0.00001885371,0.006417423],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982348,0.000106992906,0.0004418832,0.00025186344,0.00056395424,0.00040046874],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99806696,0.00014304557,0.00024140415,0.00018323163,0.0007856561,0.00057969],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007986233,0.00014190438,0.00020931245,0.00070575025,0.00052845094,0.00006463253,0.00063301367,0.0001599726,0.00072649505],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00029785666,0.00015371131,0.00012719625,0.0002806324,0.0011203958,0.00034694595,0.000029125082,0.00019736268,0.000013861519],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004150158,0.000011352485,0.004200814,0.000004753095,0.00010487209,0.000023244811,0.005727672,0.000023282495,0.00009445164,0.98707443,0.0019268435,0.0007667776],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010604605,0.000034735243,0.0110784825,0.00012480316,0.0000325766,0.00008368187,0.0010661181,0.0008483949,0.00013357452,0.00719438,0.97810197,0.00024082324],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9844864,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99806845,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97988003,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002099742,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025191673,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7954612},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123519131","doi":"10.1017/s0069005800007360","title":"Parallel Proceedings — Converging Views: The <i>Westec</i> Appeal","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Yearbook of international Law/Annuaire canadien de droit international","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Comity; Appeal; Flexibility (engineering); Jurisdiction; Race (biology); Law and economics; Law; Political science; Grandiosity; Psychology; Sociology; Social psychology; Economics; Management","score_opus":0.01304379184956695,"score_gpt":0.25763626641313553,"score_spread":0.24459247456356858,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123519131","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.070412345,0.00008745218,0.000115534436,0.025408575,0.0016051378,0.0003078889,0.00012629436,0.000052178762,0.9018846],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9662381,0.00017299557,0.00018815976,0.003737495,0.001225606,0.00005101327,0.000047163954,0.000025129459,0.028314346],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99800396,0.000036899542,0.0003982748,0.00029820006,0.0007161868,0.0005465052],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99829453,0.00007611955,0.00021176074,0.00015024607,0.00073797064,0.00052939565],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007466378,0.00016457701,0.00017281598,0.0002759321,0.00045298002,0.00019554445,0.0011602498,0.00014084976,0.0012593947],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018553475,0.0001729437,0.00015033464,0.00019803425,0.00044899964,0.0004344594,0.000048286947,0.00025785732,0.000060387374],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029853363,0.000019392777,0.016079215,0.000004104548,0.00012069509,0.000057934743,0.0038934522,0.0000380161,0.000027482161,0.9674615,0.010513022,0.0017553199],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003000148,0.00002406185,0.006104721,0.00007538315,0.000016508686,0.00006936085,0.0014010156,0.00046312975,0.00002219448,0.0052682827,0.9860644,0.00019097638],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4691966,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8478479,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9755513,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002243627,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011434052,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996536},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124068151","doi":"","title":"E-Business Law in China: Strengths and Weaknesses","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"MacEwan University","funders":"","keywords":"Electronic signature; China; Foreign direct investment; Business; Digital signature; Certification; Commercial law; The Internet; Electronic business; Law; Political science; Business model; Computer security; Marketing; Computer science","score_opus":0.005222867904479482,"score_gpt":0.2853407110419321,"score_spread":0.28011784313745264,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124068151","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9513603,0.0024502913,0.00097366335,0.0027794724,0.00026931794,0.00007446056,3.9185002e-7,0.000026568241,0.04206555],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9896825,0.008962847,0.000016752925,0.000052006835,0.00046573396,6.652514e-7,5.0121866e-7,0.0000069496255,0.00081205525],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981201,0.00005629731,0.00017567615,0.00010765386,0.00022255456,0.0013177036],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999667,0.00007838412,0.00006942093,0.000049425416,0.000058905185,0.0000768723],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003085516,0.00007293577,0.00010134527,0.00009127681,0.00046133294,0.00008117852,0.000108447755,0.00007187765,0.000032368327],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009781753,0.00006777936,0.00002561879,0.00030867744,0.0001246273,0.00028230945,0.000015434329,0.0006761487,0.0000032942278],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029786226,0.000039455215,0.007490345,0.0000020994448,0.00001230191,0.0000066094644,0.0023349016,0.0000023416678,0.000062817744,0.8914938,0.00000952438,0.098515995],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015928999,0.00019612804,0.20948273,0.0000701765,0.000031967305,0.0002011723,0.02358372,0.000011614222,0.00007670465,0.3780661,0.3862734,0.00041335425],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008223169,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.26964375,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.51342773,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000394503,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00080484356,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99838114},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124075457","doi":"","title":"Flying Robots and Privacy in Canada","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Trespass; Drone; Tort; Seclusion; Internet privacy; Business; Privacy laws of the United States; Privacy by Design; Information privacy; Computer security; Privacy law; Expectation of privacy; Privacy policy; Political science; Law enforcement; Law; Liability; Computer science","score_opus":0.01814733757848509,"score_gpt":0.26321710293998524,"score_spread":0.24506976536150016,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124075457","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9568733,0.0002512034,0.00005197678,0.0067330506,0.00034505536,0.00013822284,0.0000038809144,0.000033463915,0.035569824],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99719614,0.00016490223,0.000085634085,0.0004236429,0.0001811657,0.00000788681,4.166758e-7,0.0000060858865,0.0019341253],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991233,0.00007035423,0.00013578325,0.00016974166,0.00023227616,0.00026855434],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99954736,0.00009285407,0.000038090253,0.000118185,0.00002773867,0.00017577264],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002856183,0.00006637242,0.00010068286,0.000023677947,0.0003480985,0.000050795024,0.00012097336,0.00004359855,0.00035937593],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000113132744,0.00005282901,0.000016171934,0.00010727737,0.000072372546,0.0002668104,0.00004164131,0.000074192016,0.00002290893],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003623943,0.0000399981,0.53605556,0.000019865069,0.00002236439,0.00006282463,0.005940644,0.000007884025,0.002452913,0.26301828,0.004191835,0.1881516],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005155122,0.000013920968,0.13373002,0.00008415373,0.000004440167,0.0000012118544,0.00068662746,0.000009728094,0.00015248831,0.0019044629,0.8627197,0.00017771135],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9813229,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99691767,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8585279,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00036791604,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00057096465,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.39349145},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124383368","doi":"","title":"Judicial Jurisdiction in Canada: The CJPTA - A Decade of Progress","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Law; Political science; Nova scotia; Context (archaeology); Judicial review; Common law; Sociology; Geography","score_opus":0.012855091849962951,"score_gpt":0.2913338133331039,"score_spread":0.2784787214831409,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124383368","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97352695,0.0015905089,0.00008080259,0.014297914,0.0006487703,0.0001694135,0.000001559233,0.000007178059,0.009676928],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99629027,0.0028086074,0.0000043447585,0.000032515018,0.0005608634,0.0000042456463,2.62902e-7,0.0000055953,0.00029328416],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99808985,0.0001225314,0.00022180696,0.00009183112,0.0004347269,0.001039246],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99934757,0.000032410393,0.0003247305,0.00016159381,0.00008218723,0.000051525145],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022780013,0.00006464647,0.00011745462,0.00004461861,0.0013000064,0.00008095745,0.000494163,0.000049422855,0.000021849246],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000112032925,0.000048463946,0.000052532247,0.00008342712,0.00021439116,0.00020187895,0.000029504425,0.00084026175,0.000001137596],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000100025885,0.000057591245,0.21834312,0.0000031839418,0.000085112086,0.000007378156,0.0049702404,0.000008629874,0.000046953108,0.40958253,0.0002711924,0.36652404],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012665526,0.00022532651,0.74845695,0.0000791233,0.00006748264,0.000055227138,0.019847814,0.0001376231,0.00011365926,0.12299648,0.106492355,0.00026140487],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9260036,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99807346,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5301138,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017859646,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01546204,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998729},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124426488","doi":"10.26686/vuwlr.v36i1.5588","title":"The Needs of the Many and the Needs of the Few: A New System of Public Interest Intervention for New Zealand","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Victoria University of Wellington Law Review","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Lawmaking; Adversarial system; Intervention (counseling); Public interest; Order (exchange); Supreme court; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Fair dealing; Balance (ability); Public relations; Business; Sociology; Legislature; Psychology","score_opus":0.02554518457729594,"score_gpt":0.2556189662009864,"score_spread":0.23007378162369047,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124426488","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.48405337,0.17447506,0.006460746,0.27009314,0.007222361,0.012285231,0.00012569242,0.00014213106,0.045142252],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9771081,0.018454779,0.000027374635,0.000044706358,0.0001859319,5.4125593e-7,9.1445247e-7,0.000005331861,0.004172316],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988142,0.0003830061,0.00035733441,0.00007306322,0.0002407331,0.00013165851],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984385,0.00028490095,0.0007119335,0.0003111884,0.00019850992,0.000054992535],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017169862,0.00008833768,0.0003211786,0.000034660294,0.00039426112,0.00002281986,0.0006712769,0.00006614459,0.000029837249],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008206542,0.000046502802,0.00038235047,0.00044698897,0.00059686776,0.00012668208,0.0001199879,0.00009371472,6.938331e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000090175316,0.00003673194,0.00062326586,0.0009252766,0.00011613732,2.355506e-8,0.0111945355,0.0000024548895,0.00004088502,0.9662878,0.0030466788,0.017636014],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007912734,0.000045454668,0.00019343142,0.002241055,0.0002501729,5.308219e-7,0.0039497814,0.0000340621,0.000092378476,0.0003451348,0.9920086,0.000048120684],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009075745,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008521799,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98896194,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000056542245,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012479626,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9975229},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125007305","doi":"","title":"Foreign Judgments at Common Law: Rethinking the Enforcement Rules","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; International law; Legal history; Civil law (Civil law); Comparative law; Public law","score_opus":0.018352113265173536,"score_gpt":0.29025956208475373,"score_spread":0.2719074488195802,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125007305","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5135162,0.003043237,0.00063818716,0.013867387,0.0003709647,0.00032880573,0.0000018064861,0.000077741424,0.4681557],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9865121,0.003971466,0.000033823544,0.00080421,0.0010846966,0.0000053101967,0.0000024747244,0.000010721607,0.0075751976],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99738634,0.00016784453,0.00023857194,0.00011637691,0.0005671186,0.001523735],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995194,0.00006221883,0.00015932383,0.00012909534,0.000051390507,0.00007857482],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034147666,0.00009952388,0.00010631252,0.000033575456,0.0026104555,0.00014321113,0.00035047953,0.00007352202,0.00030509295],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000014605968,0.00007154458,0.000110756526,0.000078159384,0.00014152032,0.00026055786,0.00005560377,0.0009191797,0.00007626104],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020102854,0.000018903402,0.0005609011,6.126669e-7,0.000047281315,5.63069e-7,0.0050164876,0.000025362686,0.000030311721,0.96201307,0.00024637836,0.032020047],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031252392,0.000093055016,0.00013597573,0.000012549703,0.000027825734,0.000031101183,0.0039388216,0.00006534699,0.000075495176,0.4297116,0.56549424,0.00010146412],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002289866,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.073149964,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.56524783,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021671965,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00055536267,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998688},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125233476","doi":"","title":"Freedom of Expression and Location: Are There Constitutional Dead Zones?","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Supreme Court Law Review: Osgoode’s Annual Constitutional Cases Conference","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Charter; Law; Commonwealth; Political science; Freedom of expression; Government (linguistics); Constitutional right; Expression (computer science); Philosophy; Human rights","score_opus":0.041088998735953425,"score_gpt":0.3126134903062507,"score_spread":0.27152449157029723,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125233476","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12558071,0.16446044,0.03715884,0.07760367,0.008138721,0.008082574,0.005168367,0.0007917422,0.5730149],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9911965,0.007008607,0.00033384102,0.00067597884,0.00041141314,0.00005965566,0.00005213441,0.0000064314886,0.00025544214],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997575,0.00030326808,0.00055741426,0.00039267223,0.0008400035,0.0003316275],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99628514,0.0005483594,0.00040983726,0.00041857114,0.0021255044,0.00021260501],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001266349,0.00025954528,0.00043261168,0.00004526292,0.0014030043,0.00009409174,0.00046622416,0.00017593199,0.0012152924],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00093876844,0.00019417478,0.0001194085,0.00030493952,0.016357096,0.0005846497,0.00014414827,0.00043945224,0.000038650436],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031641044,0.00007256446,0.0008136558,0.00017443148,0.000024050792,0.000014483251,0.00028600916,0.0000133177255,0.0004108209,0.9951442,0.0024627217,0.00055212725],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00058878853,0.00009017621,0.0019478117,0.002741395,0.00018883693,0.0002656005,0.00142318,0.000077995086,0.00021462372,0.008253684,0.9837157,0.00049220485],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027898767,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0063292603,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9868905,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000041057385,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014177203,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99989706},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125314535","doi":"","title":"The Hague Choice of Court Convention and the Common Law","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Convention; Statutory law; Common law; Political science; Treaty; Legislation","score_opus":0.010592877105990928,"score_gpt":0.30380700147795814,"score_spread":0.2932141243719672,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125314535","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.843386,0.016454928,0.0028464836,0.03999724,0.00090561,0.00043781716,0.0000011046285,0.00003399573,0.095936805],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99135077,0.00666481,0.0000024698138,0.00009264304,0.00034192295,9.166402e-7,2.5259152e-7,0.0000037471955,0.0015424455],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99858534,0.0001768996,0.00019624064,0.000053998676,0.00027002592,0.00071750116],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992503,0.00039280052,0.00016780813,0.00007137834,0.00007834842,0.00003935037],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008898169,0.000046984936,0.00008428685,0.00001678276,0.0013838348,0.000071872135,0.00016447742,0.000043179596,0.000008638204],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000054665317,0.000026641646,0.00006458824,0.00008765832,0.0005989716,0.00010076681,0.000014618867,0.00058429845,0.000001616712],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006460367,0.000009246564,0.0009957856,6.502668e-7,0.000031210657,1.7310302e-7,0.0011216936,4.2502293e-7,0.000026843614,0.9730788,0.0000368965,0.024633676],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014410301,0.00013794072,0.0063247276,0.000015559252,0.000056140336,0.00003543436,0.012625869,0.00003337953,0.0000852081,0.42342898,0.55573606,0.000079646234],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0056116194,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16734032,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.55569917,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015770261,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00030658487,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99991626},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125461684","doi":"","title":"LOST IN TRANSITION: ANSWERING THE QUESTIONS RAISED BY THE SUPREME COURT OF CANADA’S NEW APPROACH TO JURISDICTION","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Jurisdiction; Law; Jurisprudence; Original jurisdiction; Political science; Divergence (linguistics)","score_opus":0.020994341459550578,"score_gpt":0.26034756498327005,"score_spread":0.23935322352371946,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125461684","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0030009397,0.027763827,0.00029568476,0.7069251,0.00028316886,0.0019956552,0.00008442686,0.000019688898,0.25963154],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.980963,0.0050803036,0.000020994727,0.0075870743,0.00037561974,0.000050071263,0.000022423064,0.000014458092,0.0058860644],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987905,0.0002787284,0.00024438155,0.00012314944,0.00029393513,0.00026931538],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993998,0.00006240778,0.00005702945,0.00025209383,0.000060018774,0.00016868913],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012686157,0.00008471715,0.00015022208,0.00002946433,0.0007407742,0.00004189387,0.00032932134,0.000033383767,0.00026185735],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000048503698,0.000051216328,0.000053276304,0.00044168177,0.00011529222,0.000058535254,0.000006319778,0.00014584458,0.0000099337985],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004804191,0.000022664894,0.00014025702,0.000118832824,0.000019578914,0.0000021202754,0.0072749243,0.00041682334,0.000024205021,0.07153533,0.91075784,0.009682607],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005853582,0.000004862136,0.0026582472,0.0002255629,0.000027595168,0.0000022986555,0.00028319738,0.000030679003,0.0000037344346,0.00014438076,0.996494,0.000066908324],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.995981,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9994441,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9779621,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00048239934,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002819424,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.56975114},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125481302","doi":"10.1017/s2071832200001383","title":"“Transnational Law” as Proto-Concept: Three Conceptions","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"German Law Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":77,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Private law; Political science; Law; Public law; Comparative law; Municipal law; International law; Term (time); Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.02048432206843382,"score_gpt":0.34116796321686693,"score_spread":0.3206836411484331,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125481302","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.067329034,0.0001603349,0.0015784436,0.063669935,0.00068229414,0.0005483313,0.000012827249,0.00013738153,0.86588144],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958726,0.00001704581,0.0002077558,0.0020471758,0.0011347715,0.000008654198,0.000005218212,0.000006104151,0.0007006837],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986346,0.000091942726,0.00024895545,0.00013034126,0.0005796922,0.00031447443],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993522,0.000032967473,0.000110278364,0.00009254719,0.00018786172,0.00022410088],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00047819826,0.00009562261,0.00011564662,0.000038363116,0.002271311,0.00027296235,0.00021648454,0.000096470416,0.0026910757],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000011040169,0.00009156801,0.00012628951,0.00012185824,0.00036663367,0.0005608324,0.0000074482705,0.00030982777,0.00006477417],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000108062995,0.000046734396,0.000047667796,5.525497e-7,0.000010477395,0.000012683906,0.004586793,0.0000068498566,0.00019839994,0.98952585,0.0004899813,0.005063215],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00043969162,0.00010855626,0.0037923618,0.000009654541,0.000015157628,0.00006230136,0.00036895048,0.000007865855,0.00010432194,0.14233227,0.85262895,0.00012990675],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006336476,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0051367325,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92854357,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009729767,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001782428,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990276},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125870324","doi":"","title":"‘First Among Equals’: Breaking the Deadlock in Parental and Sibling Funeral Disputes","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Executor; Kinship; Statutory law; Deadlock; Sibling; Law; Common law; Political science; Genealogy; Sociology; Law and economics; History; Computer science","score_opus":0.011795020133626655,"score_gpt":0.2827142158863467,"score_spread":0.27091919575272005,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125870324","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.991425,0.0014602069,0.00053893524,0.0026266046,0.00026411389,0.0000925297,4.220913e-7,0.000020583422,0.0035715993],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958195,0.00242068,0.000012334847,0.00007086692,0.001264917,0.0000027177477,4.0843247e-7,0.00000841587,0.00040014635],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99797195,0.00013154154,0.00019397824,0.000134266,0.00026845516,0.0012998086],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996117,0.000096687545,0.00010519562,0.00006720722,0.000049239752,0.00006999973],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002442605,0.00008675173,0.00010016341,0.00008735764,0.0013488042,0.00021445016,0.00019218517,0.00006155656,0.00003514813],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000074474374,0.00006392131,0.000047442238,0.00025815627,0.00031175223,0.00032094668,0.000040787934,0.00074589875,0.0000053844556],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000050969888,0.000052601114,0.5886656,0.000003262087,0.0000611866,0.000004332905,0.02619586,0.000020095222,0.000075636344,0.33407652,0.00007198059,0.050721914],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020347151,0.00080402975,0.56746686,0.00024638613,0.00008570848,0.00024087302,0.080667734,0.0026092494,0.00005638683,0.26085508,0.08423338,0.0006995849],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006956804,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.26697508,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2600183,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00040471536,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004944468,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999513},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3127605035","doi":"","title":"La litispendance internationale et la révocation des donations entre époux en droit international privé québécois après l'arrêt RS c PR","year":2020,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Dissenting opinion; Supreme court; Interpretation (philosophy); Law; Political science; Jurisdiction; Legislation; Revocation; Impossibility; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04673601920653227,"score_gpt":0.31111832381255056,"score_spread":0.2643823046060183,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3127605035","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.003238635,0.083699204,0.00034843318,0.6658882,0.00087199686,0.00079394225,0.00027458326,0.000054378874,0.24483065],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6132019,0.3325129,0.00039420841,0.023818687,0.0013383953,0.00012156349,0.00021511661,0.000045727786,0.028351504],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997555,0.0009791879,0.00039070062,0.0002989433,0.00047312013,0.00030302],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985076,0.00039531905,0.0001986696,0.0001913628,0.00026611242,0.00044094468],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014528234,0.00018131244,0.00022614143,0.0000659578,0.00047751004,0.00023177877,0.00071174355,0.00013527567,0.0038696767],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008149485,0.00017794233,0.00017070348,0.00045847092,0.00048365848,0.00046372172,0.000058720456,0.00037791257,0.0005720886],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000019742797,0.000021429874,0.0006734835,0.00026788484,0.000072233095,0.00001225299,0.015093691,0.000012257129,0.0000025011543,0.70557994,0.0076996945,0.27056265],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001277396,0.000016528327,0.008714383,0.0017029189,0.000091247246,0.00002285891,0.00045362473,0.00019105153,0.0000020410548,0.0035372626,0.9849619,0.0001784125],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.34108105,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8862889,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97726226,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010492096,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019046272,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9970409},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3129244293","doi":"","title":"Legal Recognition of Non-Conjugal Families: New Frontiers in Family Law in the US, Canada and Europe","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Family law; Law; Genealogy; Political science; Sociology; History","score_opus":0.014363771141026308,"score_gpt":0.2351771035032266,"score_spread":0.2208133323622003,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3129244293","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011222801,0.00051688874,0.000023926807,0.000594802,0.0005967476,0.00027013564,0.000029086665,0.0000070898373,0.9867385],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.04469502,0.007306456,0.000404756,0.00474147,0.0009025744,0.000015809246,0.00021282172,0.000040425348,0.94168067],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987184,0.00014521666,0.00029948403,0.00022937643,0.0004124316,0.00019510237],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99954206,0.00008871249,0.0001020827,0.000121217025,0.00008364013,0.00006227793],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00043620184,0.00013327862,0.00028275046,0.00008470293,0.000097393735,0.00007162852,0.00017315938,0.0001637457,0.0000932125],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000036992664,0.00011404167,0.000033292064,0.00020823034,0.00016747082,0.00013359125,0.000030250929,0.00028465543,0.0000014063611],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008580012,0.000078428544,0.003952179,0.00014345947,0.00008439295,0.0002441232,0.021146577,0.000007492047,0.00004496002,0.045253698,0.8400462,0.08891264],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026039768,0.00002753535,0.004380927,0.00012859376,0.000016512955,7.888721e-7,0.0041262135,0.000007297529,0.0000032445307,0.0005350967,0.99036974,0.0001436268],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9884056,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99767244,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15032353,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020658145,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004044437,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.71746576},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W31326347","doi":"10.1016/j.jcjq.2019.05.012","title":"Die Anerkennung und Vollstreckung ausländischer Urteile nach kanadischem Recht (Supreme Court of Canada, 18.12.2003 - Beals v. Saldanha)","year":2007,"lang":"de","type":"article","venue":"IPRax: Praxis des Internationalen Privat- und Verfahrensrechts","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development; National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences","keywords":"Supreme court; Political science; Humanities; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03530740473711649,"score_gpt":0.3204974065646801,"score_spread":0.2851900018275636,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W31326347","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.78673905,0.030514402,0.0027000348,0.003900189,0.011932808,0.0020023624,0.0011049801,0.00026794014,0.16083822],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9521357,0.002769296,0.0028566879,0.0003841019,0.002331805,0.00003728626,0.00035051262,0.00014969018,0.038984913],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9912916,0.0005442889,0.0020902234,0.0013288494,0.0029842698,0.001760773],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99342924,0.0012085602,0.0014804506,0.0009911732,0.00197883,0.0009117331],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003744192,0.00091038534,0.0010287284,0.00056953635,0.0013231237,0.0003480979,0.001736663,0.0008183357,0.0026057048],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019395796,0.000999811,0.00036513148,0.0012146478,0.0012866879,0.0011567632,0.00046471364,0.0010484497,0.00011595933],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0032758245,0.0044974233,0.25842255,0.001425409,0.019367164,0.0012906108,0.046557173,0.000533695,0.013053288,0.13203713,0.3101998,0.20933995],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014492612,0.00032615583,0.060537685,0.0007381829,0.00076776603,0.000013401007,0.0009318598,0.0005292341,0.014559459,0.001969924,0.91698825,0.0011888106],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.44054583,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7669278,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.60678846,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030615316,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035648788,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999977},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3132954373","doi":"","title":"Digital Legal Deposit in Selected Jurisdictions: Australia, Canada, China, Estonia, France, Germany, Israel, Italy, Japan, Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, South Korea, Spain, United Kingdom","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Lincoln (University of Nebraska)","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Library of Australia","keywords":"Geography; China; Kingdom; Environmental protection; Archaeology","score_opus":0.013028912757024039,"score_gpt":0.23695895694228805,"score_spread":0.22393004418526402,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3132954373","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98328775,0.000031879532,0.00032050535,0.0028031112,0.0003841328,0.0003417755,0.000109776345,0.0000899398,0.01263115],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91643465,0.000018906605,0.000190518,0.00011351496,0.000483896,6.233771e-7,0.00007231472,0.000017283824,0.08266831],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99801236,0.00011448306,0.00027099613,0.00042600185,0.00060964003,0.00056652655],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99875,0.00007943942,0.0002516815,0.00027081542,0.00028672104,0.00036135945],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00022258256,0.00022881164,0.00034684793,0.00042539914,0.00077853026,0.00012278231,0.00050986256,0.00026964862,0.0004740509],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000043745815,0.0002910725,0.00010851014,0.0019359771,0.0004291297,0.00068156404,0.00009960459,0.00034564274,0.000059485566],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00047495918,0.00041194836,0.8906339,0.00003661844,0.00030883212,0.00017952875,0.05307962,0.0001852397,0.00030228926,0.0032790143,0.03601342,0.015094649],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010945163,0.00016316678,0.5215132,0.00006030309,0.000051325667,0.0000048615225,0.0022058233,0.0003195048,0.000014801034,0.000048372844,0.47423968,0.0002844207],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9681394,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97102994,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43822625,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003312633,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011902584,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99995416},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3134615578","doi":"","title":"Persisting Uncertainties in Appellate Jurisdiction at the Supreme Court","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Original jurisdiction; Law; Jurisdiction; Remand (court procedure); Political science; Certiorari; Court of record; Court of equity","score_opus":0.012412844068183578,"score_gpt":0.26082107591047066,"score_spread":0.24840823184228708,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3134615578","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9475724,0.0017270749,0.00030187704,0.017511513,0.00040556098,0.00023084927,4.5246577e-7,0.00003924015,0.032211002],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.981006,0.004425657,0.000005071176,0.00009628708,0.0005215886,0.000007432491,0.0000010837643,0.000009743928,0.01392711],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99752927,0.00021064702,0.00022719007,0.00013628579,0.0003752209,0.001521384],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995265,0.0000805258,0.00012709055,0.000096574324,0.000103542756,0.00006573643],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027566953,0.00009517995,0.000106701154,0.00008127437,0.001287319,0.00015769491,0.00021724154,0.00007881709,0.00046713676],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000069021975,0.000071023955,0.00009283973,0.00022390067,0.00016025949,0.00029755358,0.000033278997,0.00096132455,0.00012949322],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017140884,0.0002021836,0.14510022,0.00001572292,0.00036495752,0.00000790889,0.10486125,0.0011028396,0.002019664,0.41098723,0.0073037357,0.32786286],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014739159,0.00039774936,0.032915782,0.000092420785,0.00008884053,0.00018633713,0.1560138,0.0015860967,0.00010030765,0.18204221,0.6244592,0.00064334075],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010547915,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08725178,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.61715543,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018704125,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008960879,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99604094},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3135539140","doi":"10.3917/rcdip.181.0003","title":"L’exception de prévisibilité","year":2018,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue critique de droit international privé","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0202303535849991,"score_gpt":0.3429983308759759,"score_spread":0.32276797729097684,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3135539140","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.55426306,0.0010762681,0.039371118,0.09908146,0.00762932,0.00037540137,0.00008693626,0.00017557839,0.29794088],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92859715,0.0015349782,0.0012941128,0.001675994,0.0107534295,0.000028323297,0.00003029731,0.000027617472,0.056058075],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99820185,0.00023540782,0.0003713621,0.00037204157,0.00033394573,0.00048540137],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986894,0.00015280546,0.00013796844,0.00022161935,0.0005719585,0.00022626149],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001286387,0.00015405632,0.00016663602,0.00011081051,0.00030088375,0.00018373989,0.00046351107,0.00032526365,0.003905219],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005641804,0.00021990774,0.0001778825,0.00022657926,0.0005939577,0.0005235231,0.00007413758,0.0003018234,0.000614088],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003784638,0.000216735,0.00492195,0.000068187815,0.00006340108,0.00003067692,0.012928683,0.000010720514,0.0011969308,0.8820715,0.006422585,0.092030786],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024365717,0.00013988845,0.014230479,0.00034552792,0.00003858828,0.00009303901,0.00043865165,0.0032731597,0.00051984016,0.1576782,0.8227621,0.00023691688],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002002471,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014584898,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.81633943,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015229433,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00029093426,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99700534},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3137028859","doi":"","title":"The Use of Overseas Case Law in the Australian PPSA","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Legislation; Common law; Legislature; Law; Personal property; Political science; Property (philosophy); Business","score_opus":0.06122967173051668,"score_gpt":0.3132699337392461,"score_spread":0.2520402620087294,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3137028859","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8706349,0.0009712761,0.0001331364,0.116271794,0.0002869821,0.00033923928,0.000004787236,0.000023649187,0.011334198],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971121,0.0015891999,0.0000052398327,0.00048077045,0.0003012432,0.0000013096411,2.220144e-7,0.0000037295142,0.00050621235],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984113,0.00028166064,0.00016579877,0.00006739086,0.0002793214,0.00079451426],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99958456,0.00014916006,0.00009379746,0.00007418597,0.000041635634,0.00005665771],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017044037,0.000051337873,0.000067260306,0.000013459632,0.000679051,0.00012886117,0.00021459586,0.000039269784,0.000023662904],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010367435,0.000030585135,0.000073213494,0.00020375995,0.00016364211,0.0001941532,0.000011909928,0.00081098935,0.0000034612697],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003182602,0.000016785545,0.00057039334,8.901093e-7,0.000022181535,0.000050269464,0.010255306,0.000020797823,0.000032280408,0.9815632,0.00052346906,0.0069125877],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024939456,0.00014791198,0.0002812127,0.0000051291836,0.000018961253,0.00025842496,0.033855695,0.00002890938,0.000012281317,0.01843111,0.9466524,0.000058540852],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0091472855,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1004726,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9631321,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017737408,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007009002,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9974509},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3139194885","doi":"10.1111/fcre.12559","title":"The Hague Convention and Transnational Custody Disputes","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Convention; Jurisdiction; Residence; Law; Conflict of laws; Supreme court; Political science; Child custody; Convention on the Rights of the Child; Personal jurisdiction; Psychology; Sociology; Human rights; Demography","score_opus":0.024254080818758357,"score_gpt":0.326433527995847,"score_spread":0.30217944717708867,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3139194885","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0067301476,0.65376157,0.00064811856,0.27506325,0.00096327765,0.00053182716,0.00001370195,0.000069641595,0.06221845],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.19975758,0.7907724,0.00008700976,0.0024909473,0.00026347025,0.000040372062,0.000027871556,0.000007419966,0.006552921],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999201,0.00017103393,0.00014770184,0.0001117206,0.00025813776,0.00011042724],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995285,0.00015069195,0.00004367919,0.000084062005,0.00014282398,0.00005024368],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007941049,0.000049278293,0.00010092338,0.000007255336,0.0005510166,0.000083695675,0.00006761763,0.000032410488,0.00013744376],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009813436,0.00003640433,0.00006349597,0.00013241613,0.000114643626,0.00010179068,0.000011706274,0.000068400666,0.000012668288],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000018955116,0.000027567448,0.0004571978,0.00020415618,0.000024635516,0.000004574071,0.0006991866,1.8614848e-7,0.00008982158,0.73855877,0.021852901,0.23807913],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006442691,0.00000550086,0.011169043,0.00022682597,0.000032875952,0.0000016333145,0.0002522345,0.000012458945,0.0000035929625,0.0009353784,0.98724794,0.000048108945],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000070859285,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005120425,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96539503,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000022194361,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012940797,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.423803},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3139238919","doi":"10.9785/9783504386962-021","title":"The lex loci delicti Rule in Canadian Conflict of Laws","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Verlag Dr. Otto Schmidt eBooks","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Conflict of laws; Law; Political science; Biology; Genealogy; History","score_opus":0.04094449221733419,"score_gpt":0.2855148081430966,"score_spread":0.2445703159257624,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3139238919","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0011739987,0.00086349994,0.00000264085,0.0029099244,0.0005148087,0.0006143314,0.000054142674,0.00007185962,0.9937948],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.12912112,0.0007277233,0.000025063706,0.0008019117,0.00084903673,0.000030396466,0.000028053058,0.00008216933,0.86833453],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99745566,0.00009843082,0.00061781233,0.0004554312,0.0006940387,0.000678631],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99826795,0.00017934597,0.0003235462,0.0004580295,0.00020865274,0.00056250335],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007996274,0.00034598785,0.0005035976,0.00023810404,0.00078267785,0.00015919539,0.0006979513,0.0006357201,0.00055064564],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009331662,0.00031864233,0.00026626172,0.00006737016,0.00071063836,0.00007305134,0.00009016518,0.0007027134,0.00021830737],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000044402743,0.0000065898184,0.00046314608,0.000025670139,0.0000873962,0.000054413915,0.0061853984,0.0000020876676,0.00004095014,0.9588653,0.009622625,0.02460205],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026380026,0.000055561217,0.00039254632,0.000095997806,0.000044075816,9.933747e-7,0.00037341967,0.000010375588,0.000032662872,0.006973527,0.99143046,0.00032657647],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.54553527,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8172679,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9818078,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00046468028,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018983164,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99992657},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3139949028","doi":"10.17159/obiter.v41i1.10546","title":"Contractual Capacity and the Conflict of Laws in Common-Law Jurisdictions (Part 2): Australasia, North America, Asia and Africa","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Obiter","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Law; Common law; Conflict of laws; Comparative law; Civil law (Civil law); Political science; Private law; Position (finance); Municipal law; Choice of law; Public law; Business","score_opus":0.043301375399198275,"score_gpt":0.27123275677887093,"score_spread":0.22793138137967267,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3139949028","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9274706,0.00018774295,0.000024073332,0.01101969,0.00007907358,0.00030715019,0.000056203142,0.000028848379,0.06082658],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986961,0.00019817795,0.000031828138,0.0006969894,0.00012616343,0.000013833824,0.000003820948,0.000005199515,0.00022787947],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990815,0.00016663662,0.00023508836,0.0001595393,0.00017279242,0.00018443666],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994471,0.0002149892,0.000088381006,0.00009169255,0.00003811116,0.00011970435],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00023620954,0.00008738892,0.00023861183,0.000023501912,0.00024761507,0.00005910816,0.00009013626,0.000062551335,0.000102993596],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003192195,0.000067461544,0.000041955416,0.00018087219,0.0012715783,0.00015047748,0.00003379551,0.00018294387,0.0000054572038],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005389552,0.0002688474,0.14607333,0.000060516148,0.00016081343,0.00001877575,0.6220609,0.000022488113,0.00034551142,0.19958489,0.008509817,0.02235519],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009405326,0.000071202,0.03820752,0.000011453017,0.00003143264,0.0000013932889,0.0021104312,0.00016522603,0.000021397893,0.00019579455,0.9581477,0.00009589751],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005465581,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008104194,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9496379,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000013985775,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000025415251,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.826236},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3140923647","doi":"","title":"COURT OF APPEAL FOR ONTARIO","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.029134159508970005,"score_gpt":0.319971863978682,"score_spread":0.29083770446971197,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3140923647","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16358352,0.000014595752,0.0019737585,0.0064446563,0.00012929474,0.00015344041,0.0000013721288,0.000028162394,0.8276712],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9493191,0.0000052504256,0.0015452552,0.00011851418,0.00021484561,0.0000034022187,7.7743715e-7,0.0000013686383,0.048791446],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997304,0.000005288884,0.00006259388,0.00004101209,0.00008551684,0.00007515279],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99986243,0.00002067301,0.000019649045,0.000032644148,0.000038443213,0.000026139389],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00018323067,0.000017937864,0.000040119234,0.000011071241,0.00008759705,0.0000074150607,0.000041583477,0.000024363924,0.00089604704],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000007636678,0.000016274002,0.000031116462,0.000022872842,0.000034103956,0.00005455264,0.000003913798,0.000015245866,0.0000088731085],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003606586,0.000111826754,0.013341454,0.000005333726,0.0000180438,9.9980404e-8,0.03845579,0.000009109272,0.0002849774,0.79970366,0.032672875,0.11536079],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000109333254,0.0000210347,0.0032687422,0.0000013801683,0.0000032756013,3.5651862e-8,0.0005932368,0.000026055282,0.00017308994,0.00033280632,0.99544823,0.000022786537],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11152235,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.76316667,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96277535,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007759073,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009914376,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98110867},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3142066918","doi":"","title":"COURT OF APPEAL FOR ONTARIO","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.08406018535968542,"score_gpt":0.307653976796292,"score_spread":0.22359379143660657,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3142066918","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.112226,0.000004506389,0.0016078018,0.00024614244,0.00015643932,0.0001084242,8.228323e-7,0.00001836219,0.8856315],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9739966,0.0000031938666,0.0013521457,0.000042279622,0.00005317224,0.000003872746,4.6781582e-7,0.0000013796868,0.024546912],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997596,0.000005889402,0.00005705384,0.0000402173,0.00006705358,0.00007017779],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99986196,0.000012281321,0.000021373626,0.000035713227,0.000042687632,0.000025985535],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001769695,0.000017436352,0.00003935495,0.000010866159,0.00007421695,0.0000035047835,0.000047033653,0.000024605517,0.001531205],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00000704705,0.000015386126,0.000030009232,0.00002168168,0.000044664965,0.000041904204,0.000004606059,0.000013589952,0.0000057997963],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036440157,0.00007221572,0.030245189,0.000004032696,0.00001308653,1.7351742e-7,0.080944,5.20359e-8,0.0000834361,0.8726806,0.005229758,0.01069102],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013213842,0.0000652295,0.02615577,0.0000023294463,0.0000068016343,5.2381846e-8,0.0022501627,0.000003944761,0.00041849946,0.0034812882,0.96744776,0.00003604447],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.37988684,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6522092,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.962218,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003446761,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000088450455,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99938154},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3143023780","doi":"","title":"Exporting Same-Sex Marriage, Importing Same-Sex Divorce (Or How Canada’s Marriage and Divorce Laws Unleashed a Private International Law Nightmare and What to Do About It)","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nightmare; Law; Conflict of laws; Political science; Criminology; Sociology; Psychology","score_opus":0.019940484880154038,"score_gpt":0.31109343616841234,"score_spread":0.2911529512882583,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3143023780","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9093149,0.0004677977,0.00013373232,0.061091527,0.0007887304,0.0008042849,0.000010094319,0.00011189434,0.027277058],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94859457,0.00044226903,0.0005177017,0.002780209,0.00056255114,0.000053231888,0.00001171746,0.000033502638,0.047004264],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976184,0.00014131583,0.00039729456,0.0005430794,0.000692066,0.0006078654],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998543,0.00021581628,0.0003467586,0.00026743478,0.00014595674,0.00048101047],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00081319263,0.00026474666,0.00033326918,0.000077704804,0.0008372715,0.0017052826,0.000316422,0.00013502991,0.0009768925],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00038473742,0.00023846884,0.000052221207,0.00018055864,0.00020129005,0.001107894,0.00030056314,0.00021678646,0.0000095136975],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002710637,0.00016000995,0.14663643,0.00024102189,0.0004255078,0.0002739247,0.47173825,0.0000401724,0.0074901967,0.055891167,0.04512602,0.27170625],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008164307,0.00008928245,0.028413875,0.00034389916,0.00003921348,0.000013776573,0.11651613,0.00033128983,0.0005062923,0.00069912826,0.8515079,0.00072276633],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.51662594,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7407085,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8063819,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023530365,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00025849618,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99993634},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3146550811","doi":"","title":"Cross-Border Transfers of Court Proceedings Judical","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Law; Political science; Interpretation (philosophy); Transfer (computing); Judicial review; Computer science","score_opus":0.012850033173358578,"score_gpt":0.3831301442597012,"score_spread":0.3702801110863426,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3146550811","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9140848,0.00027613412,0.0005195371,0.006321973,0.00029082695,0.00009707407,0.0000015273306,0.000021859189,0.0783863],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99023753,0.0035070227,0.000016618153,0.000030009627,0.0005286113,0.0000017374701,2.3480113e-7,0.000009053915,0.0056691663],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99798,0.000018547658,0.00020999867,0.00011814214,0.00044824238,0.0012250422],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993678,0.000015444326,0.0001875361,0.000088819615,0.00023313434,0.00010730561],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023753773,0.00007715031,0.00014477366,0.000047742436,0.0017040683,0.00026246233,0.00037632955,0.00010437019,0.0002681295],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001560432,0.00007105872,0.000120097095,0.00005471906,0.00046421104,0.00047094465,0.000016001379,0.0008213041,0.000007176073],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001226871,0.0001027223,0.045592908,0.000008006956,0.00013260286,0.000001852526,0.005660428,0.000001513283,0.00072091277,0.8325299,0.00017316788,0.11495329],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0032493724,0.0012635165,0.11369696,0.00010159666,0.00014839375,0.00015663181,0.012714655,0.00005342282,0.0007069235,0.19004843,0.67728484,0.00057526707],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013526373,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003689429,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6771117,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00029362034,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018152194,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995956},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3148514299","doi":"","title":"COURT OF APPEAL FOR ONTARIO","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Law; Political science; History","score_opus":0.05290381990451381,"score_gpt":0.3098131237803991,"score_spread":0.2569093038758853,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3148514299","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4130006,0.000009522751,0.0014258404,0.0011627458,0.00015298082,0.00012521436,0.0000010977834,0.000023112301,0.5840989],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95334834,0.000013387502,0.0006019185,0.00005787584,0.00008786029,0.0000032652945,8.28795e-7,0.000001319144,0.045885224],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99972475,0.000005914513,0.00005945641,0.000041682735,0.00009554331,0.00007263872],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998514,0.00002277825,0.000019614943,0.000033499164,0.0000461553,0.000026571279],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00012072417,0.000018066545,0.000044840064,0.000011322906,0.00016808439,0.0000029395405,0.000039974668,0.000024393119,0.00047850306],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000095089335,0.000016357677,0.00003369305,0.000028353375,0.00006913408,0.000039774335,0.00000389462,0.000015381245,0.0000049038067],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007708003,0.00018720543,0.13210672,0.000010453219,0.00003459685,0.000001919408,0.11743839,0.000003784463,0.00042546625,0.66567516,0.07064474,0.013394449],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012622096,0.000034268363,0.018333623,0.0000013226094,0.0000025999916,2.8081288e-7,0.0006234025,0.000007121377,0.0001323126,0.00040065986,0.9803118,0.000026383797],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2126192,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.45410094,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9096671,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000050413986,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015659767,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.79262406},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3149844019","doi":"10.1093/icon/moab102","title":"Comparative law at the heart of immigration law: Criminal inadmissibility and conjugal immigration in Canada and the United States","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Immigration; Immigration law; Law; Criminal law; Comparative law; Political science; State (computer science); Sociology","score_opus":0.021672226556005276,"score_gpt":0.31211759102192743,"score_spread":0.2904453644659222,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3149844019","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9684999,0.00058150844,0.00014269986,0.0222374,0.00042528,0.00011119076,0.00009105322,0.0000021516278,0.007908839],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980453,0.00021316842,0.00004553557,0.0015008586,0.000106243,0.0000023628068,0.000030898293,0.0000013162261,0.00005430124],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99842894,0.00033826838,0.00042472873,0.00009428405,0.0006241923,0.00008960552],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99791014,0.00067168835,0.00025001168,0.000053167692,0.0010536266,0.000061350365],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00085816387,0.00007187776,0.00017497157,0.000035764406,0.0003386469,0.000069999514,0.00011617594,0.0000315732,0.00007572149],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007459669,0.000047989597,0.000046297762,0.00009470107,0.0027587456,0.00028081296,0.000044588647,0.00015243414,3.356774e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00030534776,0.000028239576,0.003725104,0.0000031684663,0.00005473223,0.000011350897,0.003669056,0.00026675186,0.00015999012,0.9915519,0.000139775,0.00008458836],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0053033754,0.00012777977,0.057307273,0.0002912547,0.00016642985,0.0006100269,0.035970602,0.0019128822,0.004707202,0.060952835,0.8323302,0.00032013012],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8141705,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98317105,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93059903,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00033471314,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014247736,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999552},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3150294960","doi":"","title":"Le contrat de mariage en droit québécois : Un destin marqué du sceau du paradoxe","year":2006,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.004327173251825506,"score_gpt":0.20983599832189767,"score_spread":0.20550882507007218,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3150294960","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.40138876,0.002206142,0.00561278,0.081218466,0.0013457197,0.0003823697,0.000017101713,0.0002135986,0.50761503],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9265156,0.0007776471,0.0008192511,0.0010213121,0.0024140857,0.000018364222,0.000009929355,0.000024999817,0.06839884],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99771357,0.00040392223,0.00041618512,0.0003758373,0.0003738544,0.00071662065],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988946,0.00041316752,0.00013877061,0.00021419283,0.000103240425,0.00023606262],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011350344,0.00023248197,0.00029640304,0.00005579043,0.00090380793,0.0002153963,0.0003023699,0.00032611284,0.0027589148],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001133452,0.00025914237,0.00018908828,0.00037930332,0.00048570294,0.00035718104,0.00006223925,0.00021522891,0.00029775975],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002223257,0.00035480462,0.032897733,0.000015868622,0.00003583527,0.00008493696,0.003883408,0.000035323646,0.0002632545,0.9061928,0.018522417,0.037691433],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00082987174,0.000093034876,0.07376535,0.00003185072,0.00008655277,0.00003275252,0.0015535029,0.0012949416,0.00031309942,0.021395564,0.900238,0.00036548456],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7281692,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3879826,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8847972,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00033189365,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00084805215,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99998605},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3150368514","doi":"","title":"COURT OF APPEAL FOR ONTARIO","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.02806408851281638,"score_gpt":0.3228265749649389,"score_spread":0.2947624864521225,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3150368514","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13252042,0.000010783079,0.0020821858,0.0056389812,0.00013188153,0.00015464913,9.0833106e-7,0.000028996717,0.8594312],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9758726,0.0000042353868,0.00062268757,0.00017689263,0.00008832248,0.0000011166197,7.7669495e-7,7.1841447e-7,0.023232682],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99973935,0.000005169057,0.000057779056,0.00004071097,0.00008366332,0.00007334524],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998693,0.000014936612,0.000019104396,0.00003264467,0.000038626484,0.000025388066],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00016309341,0.00001796894,0.000042591542,0.000011154671,0.00008561493,0.000007999987,0.000040820374,0.000024318066,0.000324567],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000083755,0.00001612738,0.000031424133,0.00002780262,0.000022993725,0.000040741597,0.0000016830471,0.000014831886,0.0000028199456],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030005931,0.000077267556,0.0041896817,0.0000019346821,0.000006448759,1.7730783e-7,0.017343221,0.0000012891844,0.00034497885,0.9031452,0.014131226,0.060728583],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012544537,0.000085921776,0.019023392,0.0000021193248,0.0000038808134,4.5655028e-8,0.0006198347,0.000009286527,0.0001502397,0.0040856428,0.9758658,0.000028402577],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.072055645,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3136056,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96173453,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000049100276,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000087801585,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.93412364},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3154848296","doi":"10.1017/s0069005800009024","title":"Four Flaws: Reflections on the Canadian Approach to Private International Law","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Yearbook of international Law/Annuaire canadien de droit international","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Conflict of laws; International law; Political science; Jurisprudence; Public international law; Private law; Public law; Terminology; Consistency (knowledge bases); Comparative law; Federalism; CLARITY; Constitution","score_opus":0.02978425839318673,"score_gpt":0.2946982329152556,"score_spread":0.2649139745220689,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3154848296","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018209113,0.000009559816,0.00038045945,0.029741155,0.003392743,0.00047160866,0.00052173424,0.000054132906,0.9472195],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9632365,0.000013034181,0.00081863726,0.01315878,0.001719421,0.000065053515,0.00014427163,0.000041934327,0.020802328],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99675333,0.00008624928,0.00056059833,0.00049923843,0.0011907261,0.00090986304],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996668,0.00019106416,0.00019735684,0.00036055795,0.001037623,0.0015454206],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017614631,0.00025430074,0.00020914592,0.00097556884,0.0010520386,0.00034947402,0.0018820767,0.0002620617,0.0011763329],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00051794376,0.00027762106,0.00020102385,0.00037109506,0.00047458702,0.00035382874,0.000065309236,0.00047732837,0.00014270277],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003905205,0.000037531703,0.001057426,0.0000020176997,0.00020110566,0.00006160008,0.0027096744,0.00015413637,0.000043543325,0.989202,0.0057408027,0.00075107673],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023681048,0.000046472713,0.005158014,0.000067157685,0.000015489624,0.000040812916,0.00080591073,0.0001919247,0.00012769052,0.009765204,0.98324907,0.00029541712],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95309037,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99857444,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9794368,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009608278,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023611016,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999676},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3155326177","doi":"","title":"The Constitutionality of Using Production Orders to Obtain Stored Communications Content","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionality; Charter; Production (economics); Parliament; Law; Order (exchange); State (computer science); Supreme court; Phrase; Political science; Economic Justice; Section (typography); Computer science; Business; Advertising; Economics; Politics; Algorithm","score_opus":0.0872357522293535,"score_gpt":0.3693318671618149,"score_spread":0.2820961149324614,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3155326177","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94332725,0.0012197873,0.0129051665,0.035414983,0.001087388,0.0004324452,0.000002675265,0.000031281408,0.005578997],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99756175,0.0012314335,0.00019323776,0.000052216332,0.0004239471,0.000002898375,6.093935e-7,0.00000326481,0.00053064927],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985541,0.0002601199,0.00020916924,0.00008052005,0.00027165248,0.0006244294],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998967,0.000061447594,0.00015311978,0.00021033474,0.00055284286,0.00005525686],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003989403,0.000048184764,0.000071734496,0.000041535543,0.0023283353,0.000044400353,0.000315113,0.00003280958,0.000010442937],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00043543067,0.000037552985,0.00004928843,0.00023835116,0.0008800282,0.00012740555,0.000033781205,0.00035600743,0.000004512433],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000040982995,0.00003518093,0.0022135212,5.823584e-7,0.000051035524,3.4324298e-8,0.002334387,0.000011749539,0.0012930473,0.9818303,0.00009023891,0.012098931],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00059003884,0.0004057067,0.005566117,0.000060785747,0.00009376667,0.00006422462,0.06194341,0.00020849817,0.0004711579,0.12661897,0.80372113,0.00025617913],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038395838,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.056437902,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8552113,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00083950005,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030210617,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989705},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3159327241","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3910648","title":"International Law Association’s Guidelines on Intellectual Property and Private International Law (“Kyoto Guidelines”): Jurisdiction","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Law; Intellectual property; Conflict of laws; International law; Political science; Subject-matter jurisdiction; Business; Original jurisdiction","score_opus":0.033178313282403615,"score_gpt":0.3306543823224574,"score_spread":0.2974760690400538,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3159327241","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.095325395,0.0020904082,0.0068803956,0.3089589,0.010780862,0.0005741872,0.000043403234,0.00035140602,0.57499504],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8325543,0.04037467,0.0010772919,0.008143737,0.009256049,0.000028777533,0.00006830819,0.000060316313,0.108436584],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99648035,0.00022513465,0.0006966486,0.00036242744,0.0011276433,0.0011077872],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972822,0.00014644407,0.00034121418,0.00013862563,0.0019470395,0.00014445955],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035984332,0.0001974889,0.00021054316,0.00012237606,0.0009766816,0.000497792,0.0003739591,0.00019576633,0.00054475217],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018698757,0.0001630601,0.00015319244,0.00021419051,0.00011394523,0.0006022979,0.00010351441,0.0011463325,0.00005790645],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000095264855,0.000108595996,0.0008132898,0.0000019013352,0.0003534891,0.000008486147,0.0016520979,0.000040495084,0.00038914697,0.94191545,0.005046326,0.049575437],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00069907337,0.00011402166,0.00013172999,0.000049820625,0.000035736557,0.000094988965,0.0017825699,0.00033109146,0.00019395028,0.050873604,0.945489,0.00020440885],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017566904,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01507558,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9404427,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027641244,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001438361,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.84125274},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3160375458","doi":"10.1093/jiplp/jpaa196","title":"Canadian Federal Court of Appeal Rules it can interpret contracts: rejects Goldilocks approach to jurisdiction  <i>Salt Canada Inc v Baker</i>, 2020 FCA 127, 28 July 2020","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Jurisdiction; Goldilocks principle; Law; Federal court; Political science; Taste; Law and economics; Economics; Psychology; Supreme court","score_opus":0.019796597576460375,"score_gpt":0.262074863091499,"score_spread":0.24227826551503864,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3160375458","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.039668456,0.0010551513,0.00197577,0.40146643,0.0025798222,0.001734981,0.00020800109,0.00008985309,0.55122155],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9707422,0.00052909256,0.0010140943,0.025344994,0.0014606501,0.000009932029,0.0000146893635,0.00004711042,0.0008372376],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9952609,0.00083717215,0.0013024658,0.00043925262,0.0014339203,0.00072630326],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9948053,0.0009047624,0.0007931653,0.00022777727,0.001672948,0.0015960527],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019158518,0.00035576205,0.00071117067,0.00011826796,0.0008451148,0.0003745375,0.000743865,0.00025434443,0.0003414069],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007732173,0.00027604008,0.00018888374,0.000642735,0.0002251655,0.0010814536,0.000103285,0.0013374613,0.000036299207],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.004126535,0.00041859297,0.00010746256,0.00010062854,0.00066120864,0.00030611578,0.102415875,0.00034838144,0.0014426428,0.0012297253,0.8795663,0.0092765335],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005738576,0.0011619692,0.000035940782,0.00014255189,0.00016335382,0.00021276568,0.012257998,0.00073043077,0.00055292394,0.00002371784,0.98378855,0.00035592413],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96844065,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9670793,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9310737,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015819166,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009438537,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999692},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3160920373","doi":"","title":"The forms and architects of China's international legal order","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Oxford University Research Archive (ORA) (University of Oxford)","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"China; Law; Political science; Comparative law; Private law; Chinese law; Law and economics; Economics","score_opus":0.01977485562290755,"score_gpt":0.2780488031252014,"score_spread":0.2582739475022939,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3160920373","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.61577547,0.00007943141,0.0030709468,0.01009311,0.0001292666,0.00026475068,0.00010955109,0.000030826744,0.37044665],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97026587,0.0072803544,0.0019492274,0.0000125022625,0.000059188555,1.06095804e-7,0.00003356497,0.000008542954,0.02039063],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978928,0.0004254734,0.000109100365,0.00029070588,0.00084229314,0.00043964808],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983262,0.00045888853,0.000118575816,0.00026174833,0.00062022003,0.00021438232],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009950071,0.00009970979,0.00018571423,0.00031365463,0.0020521535,0.00006113839,0.0008222002,0.000078530735,0.00021114943],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023402662,0.000106422594,0.0001282264,0.0007631748,0.002083966,0.0004932411,0.00083603855,0.0004090716,0.0000016291127],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013718122,0.00031885688,0.024561936,0.000073726645,0.00037760154,0.00029313148,0.03531447,0.000038258895,0.0016738065,0.82058245,0.002648978,0.11274496],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007757841,0.00014259937,0.042699825,0.000039631537,0.00001943297,0.000005448429,0.04484506,0.00033818412,0.00005965359,0.004688391,0.9062739,0.0001121004],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005154164,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.026681146,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9036249,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001205467,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006811186,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999247},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3162675507","doi":"10.1093/law/9780198840107.003.0067","title":"Canada","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Choice of law; Jurisdiction; Conflict of laws; Law; Political science; Legislature; Competence (human resources); Autonomy; Public administration; Economics; Management","score_opus":0.0239355248983954,"score_gpt":0.21573659232885034,"score_spread":0.19180106743045494,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3162675507","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000023822407,0.00007786355,0.000016937673,0.00019942175,0.00041109073,0.00013114193,0.00008252405,0.000050561433,0.9990066],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00045827415,0.0005168424,0.00002684137,0.000118836026,0.00023782413,1.3822225e-7,0.000019860585,0.000013836011,0.9986076],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990575,0.000031112206,0.00008440318,0.0002374874,0.00038561277,0.00020389358],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99936193,0.00004091426,0.00010005253,0.00020600787,0.00013591361,0.00015519703],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00007326459,0.00013957954,0.00018426261,0.000040040984,0.0005045115,0.00004395484,0.00026194425,0.00023966399,0.00035981543],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000058939077,0.00018400984,0.00010128937,0.000005493821,0.00013947608,0.000046281748,0.0001222942,0.00023365804,3.361864e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000085293195,0.0000017684542,0.0000018815151,0.000008304132,0.000046178855,0.00017600569,0.0003704328,5.3501094e-7,7.50756e-7,0.9778604,0.01416138,0.0073638223],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010941872,0.000007140903,0.0000058240716,0.000046025056,0.00006299424,7.6862983e-7,0.00020937515,0.0000016706739,0.000004569507,0.00014358862,0.9992107,0.00019788597],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7636845,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.92457324,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98504937,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00048151484,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021362875,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7503703},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3163144258","doi":"10.1017/9781108597135.013","title":"Cambridge Studies in International and Comparative Law","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Content (measure theory); Action (physics); Computer science; Law; Information retrieval; Political science; Mathematics; Physics","score_opus":0.1774137959823022,"score_gpt":0.4383854440602534,"score_spread":0.26097164807795126,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3163144258","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0001509512,0.0004999705,0.0000015313633,0.00080531416,0.000829922,0.00009699964,0.000008591438,0.00016223275,0.9974445],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.020108592,0.0028888094,0.000022442233,0.00008426809,0.00037540274,0.000009277945,0.0000021262817,0.00003217596,0.9764769],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995963,0.000028550076,0.00006502825,0.0001076175,0.00012972554,0.00007278278],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998414,0.000057482455,0.000032770065,0.00003079918,0.000018122124,0.000019422769],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00013379696,0.000053643966,0.000120804936,0.00007750914,0.000048409896,0.000021944372,0.00005280606,0.00006154331,0.0003516642],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000011266215,0.000047901398,0.0000133555595,0.00006294877,0.00024111403,0.000033032607,0.000031151307,0.000050523344,0.000057228415],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000017560953,0.00000869611,0.00039842253,0.0000045197185,0.000057924117,0.0000046718305,0.010908131,7.968791e-8,2.9790868e-7,0.58958745,0.3983013,0.00072674616],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008002246,0.0000044709077,0.00046743406,0.00005689615,0.000002942524,8.888558e-8,0.00777167,0.0000026010468,4.2189617e-7,0.0001156992,0.99144214,0.000055584063],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.050103884,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4838318,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5931409,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000045807512,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000015019999,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9562216},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3163571463","doi":"","title":"Hong Kong's Children Proceedings (Parental Responsibility) Bill : Comparative Family Law Reform and Multidisciplinary Collaboration","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian journal of family law","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Multidisciplinary approach; Law; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.02786398686844673,"score_gpt":0.29906628127550855,"score_spread":0.27120229440706184,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3163571463","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8732107,0.00038629037,0.0000013229126,0.0012323838,0.0004740118,0.0003550124,0.000043538377,0.000012270085,0.124284424],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998726,0.000049073144,0.00013050041,0.0003337768,0.0002651716,0.0000021856663,0.0000062675203,0.000011312864,0.00047568974],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986152,0.00008214219,0.00040131254,0.00021535212,0.0003402799,0.00034568392],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983889,0.000045621535,0.00027533123,0.000099008685,0.00056240754,0.00062873104],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008208148,0.0001466178,0.0002933058,0.00019516051,0.0007851854,0.00028747652,0.00021098883,0.00013398993,0.000029828692],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000025419762,0.00012119094,0.000073652016,0.00039917108,0.00056113664,0.0010320499,0.000021862843,0.00025444402,0.000012867582],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00054887397,0.0001138362,0.32736492,0.000035634526,0.0002038659,0.00005775759,0.12578304,0.000028822098,0.00743349,0.53472984,0.0023321107,0.0013678295],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013265708,0.00065617956,0.8093874,0.00018981576,0.000055439756,0.00003107381,0.057839263,0.000046894478,0.00024286252,0.0017617238,0.12807946,0.0003833167],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.142426,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.39139712,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5329681,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007290708,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012526419,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.86328465},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3168805362","doi":"","title":"The Way We Do Things Back Home: Do Expatriate Judges Preferentially Cite the Jurisprudence of Their Home Countries?","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Expatriate; Nationality; Jurisdiction; Law; Jurisprudence; Commonwealth; Political science; Foreign national; State (computer science); Sociology; Immigration","score_opus":0.009298472188995058,"score_gpt":0.24933986991380463,"score_spread":0.2400413977248096,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3168805362","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9347726,0.02229538,0.00048044533,0.032346264,0.0010784407,0.00064990076,0.0000059668037,0.000051875108,0.008319123],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8733739,0.121624894,0.000008403085,0.00011704605,0.0006609291,0.000013646077,6.877123e-7,0.000017954912,0.00418253],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99621296,0.00043895427,0.00047665584,0.0002176516,0.00081570464,0.0018380962],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99821013,0.00042735436,0.0005202198,0.00032418137,0.00040417918,0.00011393738],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004732648,0.00019812754,0.00023864221,0.00006672964,0.0019651973,0.0008280927,0.0011375729,0.0001359883,0.0006432133],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007704984,0.00010472573,0.00022215594,0.0002959481,0.0004906949,0.00067617267,0.00009404723,0.0013826847,0.00012048783],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001968498,0.00010437813,0.007816631,0.000024164587,0.0005671333,8.744792e-7,0.05649932,0.000013519674,0.00059271615,0.77128154,0.004145433,0.15875742],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009295834,0.0004251528,0.008720803,0.000116647665,0.00009202352,0.000030712767,0.03909667,0.000028239225,0.0002196123,0.5198638,0.4300832,0.0003935967],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014593287,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030925162,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.42593774,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004375575,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017371537,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993341},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3168928576","doi":"","title":"L’interaction du droit d’auteur avec la sanction des manoeuvres de confusion ou de parasitisme","year":2021,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de propriété intellectuelle","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Intellectual property; Concurrence; Common law; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.015473348790219282,"score_gpt":0.2720755309102836,"score_spread":0.2566021821200643,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3168928576","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8229788,0.005544087,0.091665484,0.005946939,0.0021726682,0.00034487984,0.000016039048,0.00021600319,0.07111511],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8993049,0.015501509,0.0025808134,0.0008711936,0.001078362,0.000055271154,0.000030195239,0.000068049376,0.08050966],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9959439,0.0015226732,0.0005048375,0.0006049322,0.00044930182,0.00097432284],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998008,0.00073183473,0.00023781243,0.0002914875,0.00034312624,0.000387703],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015630986,0.00036122825,0.00037596165,0.00015886569,0.0016431048,0.0003897721,0.00027723517,0.00095527974,0.0074879997],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009800288,0.00043747996,0.0003479668,0.00063525664,0.001488887,0.0004499825,0.000090826376,0.0011969962,0.00033655006],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00047975098,0.000757843,0.0093915425,0.0003498526,0.00030427446,0.0005730692,0.19349818,0.0006218855,0.014116225,0.05332215,0.008290417,0.7182948],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007431136,0.00024823824,0.007064681,0.00044366324,0.00022814742,0.00086208025,0.015043657,0.011373712,0.016845863,0.024396641,0.92217714,0.00057309616],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0054560145,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029263913,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91388667,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002478439,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00085762504,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998077},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3170429193","doi":"","title":"Equity in the Age of the Internet: Google Inc. v. Equustek Solutions Inc.","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Equity (law); Enforcement; Supreme court; Political science; The Internet; Law; Law and economics; Business; Economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.027105794267258176,"score_gpt":0.31758106199452196,"score_spread":0.2904752677272638,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3170429193","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91045564,0.0011109659,0.00040279602,0.006260363,0.00058414,0.000321159,0.0000026514786,0.0000135984465,0.08084869],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99527895,0.0007988713,0.0000034110235,0.00017273953,0.00019027934,0.000002965042,0.0000011908623,0.0000052415453,0.0035463308],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977542,0.00037281757,0.00022887188,0.0000935717,0.00043148172,0.0011190561],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995185,0.00008748666,0.00014877116,0.00016138071,0.00005761715,0.000026221422],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004622174,0.00006889377,0.00010790857,0.000053372187,0.0003396524,0.000065466105,0.00067350967,0.00006922087,0.00013180786],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000070382244,0.0000418176,0.00009080609,0.00027403294,0.00015642092,0.00016258897,0.000118204945,0.0011552145,0.000029433037],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023142693,0.00010699725,0.012178315,0.0000040573213,0.000039681447,0.0000011864743,0.01613826,0.000028280334,0.0005073617,0.9493936,0.00041623096,0.021162922],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001412132,0.00055983843,0.060870815,0.00010312252,0.00007049457,0.00009007271,0.051353082,0.0002525791,0.00005612008,0.36553213,0.5193818,0.00031775836],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006682803,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09388606,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5838614,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00066571264,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015226641,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99993175},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3172460546","doi":"","title":"A Proposed Transjudicial Approach to s. 15(2)Charter Adjudication","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Adjudication; Charter; Political science; International law; Law; Law and economics; Business; Economics","score_opus":0.019784451617929466,"score_gpt":0.2909947069325724,"score_spread":0.27121025531464293,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3172460546","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08712161,0.00014829681,0.018164853,0.030682724,0.0008707911,0.00071138714,0.000007778503,0.00022198031,0.86207056],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9929548,0.000058665766,0.0015643506,0.002909668,0.002112856,0.00000404424,0.00000440951,0.000010546104,0.00038066544],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983748,0.00014505189,0.00028346293,0.00019062041,0.0006106432,0.000395387],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99925625,0.000015415613,0.00010442795,0.00012619911,0.00015030107,0.00034738507],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008713607,0.0001111221,0.00016248475,0.00008923659,0.0013975068,0.00025248967,0.00026686478,0.00011011026,0.00020377059],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000029206116,0.00010278885,0.00010864556,0.00029026272,0.00010318865,0.00033588274,0.000007664784,0.00027319655,0.000064145315],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025191347,0.0008596411,0.00026239833,0.000007733357,0.000057011657,0.000029094961,0.10490612,0.00006336325,0.004700486,0.57611036,0.011967209,0.3007847],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00077725644,0.00032509567,0.008080288,0.000031035364,0.000044588363,0.000049581293,0.0015719724,0.0000663675,0.00023883123,0.009553641,0.9789725,0.00028882193],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007354882,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013531009,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9670053,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000087334985,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000120722674,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99990255},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3174052708","doi":"","title":"Organized Pseudolegal Commercial Arguments in Canadian Inter-Partner Family Court Disputes","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Meaning (existential); Phenomenon; Government (linguistics); Law; Spouse; Family law; Political science; Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.016288455452285824,"score_gpt":0.3124513646557923,"score_spread":0.2961629092035065,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3174052708","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93017316,0.000351342,0.00014678772,0.023626179,0.0011636649,0.00018376131,0.000004193179,0.000023676022,0.044327248],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.993443,0.0015232585,0.000011374967,0.00026272118,0.00080795184,0.0000033617043,0.0000024117269,0.000015457272,0.0039304583],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966696,0.00015490128,0.00024891563,0.0001672679,0.00032693072,0.002432376],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991721,0.000027316926,0.00017291738,0.00019935044,0.00009637573,0.00033196926],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027073484,0.00012608884,0.00018797211,0.00015502993,0.0020533681,0.00047743908,0.0006554181,0.00013290306,0.00017551593],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021341599,0.00012292295,0.00008081916,0.00009440196,0.00017621982,0.00051077286,0.0000428371,0.001378011,0.000063208434],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010063497,0.00017142302,0.5254237,0.0000034649504,0.00017948405,0.00004702662,0.010057659,0.000002532974,0.000302211,0.33563122,0.003867116,0.12421354],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0022039649,0.00020397594,0.39842767,0.00007068818,0.000041916144,0.000039973063,0.0060280673,0.00006376401,0.000020061723,0.035621684,0.5568588,0.00041944525],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.694432,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98682755,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5529917,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024881505,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0062576,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999376},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3176972755","doi":"10.1080/20414005.2021.1937448","title":"What’s a palace? In search of the vulnerable edifices of transnational sovereignty","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Transnational Legal Theory","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Sovereignty; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Political economy; Criminology; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.02216821477597833,"score_gpt":0.3014603085959229,"score_spread":0.2792920938199446,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3176972755","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8100934,0.00048800773,0.0006948547,0.048239782,0.001031566,0.00034361312,0.000101080965,0.000021034077,0.13898663],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99698764,0.000051138122,0.00007099731,0.00009127305,0.00006666163,0.000008115425,0.000012369073,0.000005333206,0.0027064786],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99778694,0.00082600577,0.0002794375,0.00014619915,0.0008109389,0.0001504939],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987481,0.00073700584,0.000059139573,0.00010426766,0.00031709275,0.00003435154],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023485254,0.00006612484,0.00013188356,0.00007169972,0.00022313086,0.00004101796,0.00020230708,0.00007827861,0.0017032214],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000075983524,0.00005670418,0.00012618571,0.00044959388,0.00032355828,0.00048578368,0.00000996442,0.00023387026,5.4487623e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000056935027,0.00013970015,0.00056937756,0.000020593494,0.000019283914,0.0000010218943,0.008297037,0.00053892884,0.0019887758,0.9874562,0.000008270831,0.0009038901],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0021026242,0.00006046927,0.11109447,0.00010072051,0.000050985334,0.000004400459,0.026419546,0.00042828274,0.0356109,0.75101554,0.07280087,0.0003111903],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009869397,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001553632,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23644063,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004987025,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007357939,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99920934},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3177270722","doi":"10.7202/1077698ar","title":"L’autorité de la règle de rattachement en droit international privé : regards croisés vietnamo-québécois","year":2021,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.00705301801885037,"score_gpt":0.27713052732720767,"score_spread":0.2700775093083573,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3177270722","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.772363,0.0053261337,0.015897987,0.026956413,0.0027633207,0.00025938477,0.00008068326,0.00016887361,0.1761842],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.752288,0.0044299765,0.0042259106,0.002192378,0.0028238026,0.00006189428,0.00006298335,0.000062014915,0.23385303],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970497,0.00061988406,0.00040004498,0.0004862453,0.00064540096,0.00079872087],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985648,0.00036979417,0.00017558922,0.00031138046,0.00018514764,0.00039330026],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018415445,0.0002514068,0.0002970707,0.00009047605,0.00055593817,0.00034106508,0.0004960333,0.0007645958,0.001747839],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000464135,0.00034115167,0.00031336496,0.0003948684,0.00079282734,0.00028189473,0.00011316065,0.0008428412,0.00006535636],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006869892,0.0006051251,0.017777467,0.00011815423,0.0005090919,0.00068750454,0.11089399,0.0001912623,0.0041679973,0.6701901,0.00825379,0.18653682],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00064533565,0.000059587594,0.013899774,0.00013042557,0.00014085254,0.00011739582,0.007011206,0.0010509206,0.0024368335,0.027652243,0.9464861,0.00036931847],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0125622945,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008259723,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9382323,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006146897,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014315458,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99990404},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3177680402","doi":"","title":"'State Succession to Bits in the Context of the Transfer of Territory of Macao to China: Lessons Learned from the Sanum Saga'.","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"China; Ecological succession; Scope (computer science); Context (archaeology); Convention; State (computer science); Treaty; Political science; Law; Geography; Economy; Computer science; Economics; Archaeology","score_opus":0.026397391564572017,"score_gpt":0.31446669217293377,"score_spread":0.2880693006083618,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3177680402","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9600625,0.00038969886,0.00038269564,0.0372267,0.00022921324,0.00023856791,0.000014230493,0.0000035012497,0.0014528625],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99819297,0.0009251603,0.000003686209,0.00028589967,0.00026844506,0.0000031153834,3.899379e-7,0.0000067581163,0.00031356025],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99799174,0.00050072453,0.00031370023,0.00011210243,0.00047139745,0.0006103267],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994289,0.00013544131,0.00011747272,0.00018112923,0.00009466183,0.00004238853],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022636321,0.000080862235,0.00016518198,0.000053397638,0.0003594869,0.000023434717,0.0006842484,0.00005229014,0.00005224368],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008271211,0.000040665866,0.00011417455,0.0003522606,0.00022873416,0.000085848544,0.000031970183,0.0005833256,0.0000023447258],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007499638,0.0003290476,0.0234429,0.000009934727,0.00018137209,9.297603e-7,0.42119813,0.000045011515,0.06426634,0.09326953,0.0010529575,0.3954539],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0026986364,0.0024300963,0.4710572,0.00071388343,0.00017026982,0.000014511449,0.18126632,0.000047082263,0.035555605,0.12301306,0.18257008,0.00046323577],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021470157,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.19839722,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4476143,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001561117,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00090367533,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98504597},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3183751795","doi":"10.3917/rcdip.212.0491","title":"The Elgar Companion to the Hague Conference on Private International Law, par Thomas John, Rishi Gulati et Ben Köhler (dir.), Edward Elgar, 2020, 544 pages","year":2021,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue critique de droit international privé","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law and economics; Law; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.0313685133514739,"score_gpt":0.32643751270842075,"score_spread":0.29506899935694686,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3183751795","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.044903055,0.0032302104,0.00797255,0.706784,0.012063638,0.0008319761,0.00040556176,0.00014129511,0.22366771],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92981327,0.011655032,0.00082831644,0.00889441,0.004153952,0.00012233746,0.00026158805,0.000057559933,0.04421351],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9959211,0.00089636806,0.000749231,0.00070926896,0.0011007721,0.0006232798],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99680054,0.0009308723,0.00031409017,0.0005810483,0.0010941998,0.00027927218],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020166934,0.00035673456,0.00034130338,0.00007940358,0.0009700459,0.0012333433,0.001605573,0.00030550425,0.001084437],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010444779,0.0003271532,0.00032241674,0.0003604216,0.0005106482,0.00054769666,0.00045551945,0.0008603985,0.00031582205],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006603592,0.00021998139,0.0015396845,0.000026737971,0.00023250701,0.00009245654,0.0037080168,0.00051641784,0.0003712751,0.94734126,0.028848382,0.017037228],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003474078,0.00007737724,0.022242071,0.0006064477,0.00005460288,0.00008289565,0.0007354006,0.004482326,0.0006154575,0.055547435,0.9148463,0.0003622943],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009243376,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009532467,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89179385,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007516962,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00033580168,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99991804},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3184145648","doi":"","title":"Choice of court agreements: selected common-law jurisdiction and Indian laws compared time for the convention of 30 June 2005 on choice of court agreements?","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"UTAS Research Repository","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Law; Choice of law; Conflict of laws; Political science; Subject-matter jurisdiction; Original jurisdiction; Plaintiff; Common law; Context (archaeology); Exclusive jurisdiction; Business; Geography","score_opus":0.05485866980026198,"score_gpt":0.38492249332431927,"score_spread":0.3300638235240573,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3184145648","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9705561,0.0011074482,0.00008093963,0.002463307,0.0006072197,0.0016492906,0.0001264692,0.00003821193,0.023371043],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99333364,0.0003100836,0.0000441688,0.000031387906,0.00028101806,0.000052192398,0.000060730308,0.0000146634275,0.005872092],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99659604,0.0007776591,0.00057818193,0.00030010563,0.0013415233,0.00040646593],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963656,0.0012546516,0.0003748954,0.00035951272,0.0015042077,0.00014113556],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020069538,0.00012566683,0.00033439932,0.0001515398,0.0008578529,0.00007095704,0.0002797156,0.00014586392,0.00017371542],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00029624664,0.00011398046,0.00010419149,0.00052094494,0.00082962797,0.00018988755,0.000089991816,0.00028151955,0.0000055453525],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0027860447,0.0074746665,0.09756697,0.0022243445,0.0039287047,0.000057995483,0.045032386,0.00032113297,0.61089605,0.044097424,0.1641287,0.021485584],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004006551,0.0012067533,0.1250733,0.00068688026,0.00024665362,0.0000055289365,0.0045254077,0.0027800305,0.116692156,0.00041241205,0.74401546,0.00034887638],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0119809,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00647716,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.57988673,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018097319,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00036491614,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9945984},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3184396697","doi":"","title":"Regulation of Contracts in Canadian Private International Law [Article]","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"UA Campus Repository (The University of Arizona)","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Business; Conflict of laws; Private law; Law and economics; Political science; Public law; Economics","score_opus":0.004917646907167414,"score_gpt":0.2031746976194812,"score_spread":0.19825705071231378,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3184396697","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7734496,0.0000075135704,0.00008111945,0.001480096,0.0002726749,0.00009047114,0.0000016402876,0.00001051361,0.22460638],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981115,0.0000054280267,0.00008828182,0.00003535438,0.000064914086,8.198282e-8,0.0000021875362,0.0000022055433,0.0016900828],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99935246,0.00011732791,0.00010363895,0.00009154523,0.00020680088,0.00012820368],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995023,0.00007319612,0.00012112221,0.00011518837,0.00010791558,0.000080294805],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003946903,0.000039386276,0.00008128522,0.00007048102,0.00031055463,0.000012367361,0.00020311435,0.00006416106,0.000055103847],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000042966312,0.00004200636,0.00004155051,0.000098605735,0.00034594373,0.00015870587,0.000020236715,0.000066518856,0.00000386084],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009653448,0.000078781326,0.119884424,0.000008969451,0.000049389695,0.000010670453,0.02311186,0.00056439097,0.021285078,0.82826865,0.0003069904,0.006334246],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00047352773,0.00004306007,0.44476408,0.000033767075,0.000020066123,0.0000018097295,0.0014150293,0.0015938921,0.0017323301,0.0015561427,0.54827857,0.00008773931],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.47434384,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.50503993,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.82671255,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016350772,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001364639,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.52915657},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3186550581","doi":"10.17159/obiter.v39i3.11328","title":"CONTRACTUAL CAPACITY AND THE CONFLICT OF LAWS IN COMMON-LAW JURISDICTIONS (PART 1): THE UNITED KINGDOM","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Obiter","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Jurisdiction; Conflict of laws; Common law; Comparative law; Political science; Civil law (Civil law); Private law; Choice of law; Position (finance); Municipal law; Public law; Business","score_opus":0.07260518125190656,"score_gpt":0.3266917376229886,"score_spread":0.254086556371082,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3186550581","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9205071,0.000036343554,0.00003462041,0.0065296437,0.00030229063,0.00027746026,0.000014761066,0.000023436727,0.07227438],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99768716,0.000043756914,0.000011041502,0.0014973963,0.00033510706,0.000014723168,0.0000029051369,0.000004985405,0.00040291803],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989535,0.00033267177,0.00022664158,0.00011046406,0.00019371556,0.00018295675],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990852,0.0004850665,0.00009692128,0.00018557948,0.00010406666,0.000043157164],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001182709,0.000072755094,0.00015381185,0.000045425848,0.0006408391,0.000071444105,0.00015860172,0.0000764975,0.00018878448],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000047576876,0.000042398857,0.000045607445,0.00025260018,0.002860923,0.00011056055,0.000035599114,0.00016855296,0.000010241253],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000108307664,0.000055528762,0.0062892064,0.0000032331468,0.00003064297,7.718097e-7,0.07009267,0.0000011905719,0.00010742331,0.9207489,0.0016222505,0.00093988836],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00082887075,0.000036547986,0.010617024,0.000020182515,0.00002232134,0.0000016195327,0.0008551276,0.0001570418,0.00010393278,0.0015882087,0.9857079,0.00006125227],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.043044556,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.037907027,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9840856,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000022285538,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000029005552,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998527},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3186962189","doi":"10.3917/rcdip.212.0361","title":"La réforme du droit de l’adoption internationale en Allemagne","year":2021,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue critique de droit international privé","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Conflict of laws; Legislature; Private law; Comparative law; German; Public law; Substantive law; Criticism; Law reform; Constitutional law; Municipal law","score_opus":0.015396704174468883,"score_gpt":0.2970802576611876,"score_spread":0.28168355348671875,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3186962189","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3629878,0.0027920804,0.042290833,0.18457639,0.0050884476,0.0003085074,0.00021178367,0.00017864378,0.40156552],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85634476,0.0143194385,0.0031328776,0.0021080635,0.005065815,0.00006528215,0.00024658526,0.00005005458,0.11866712],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974567,0.0005090817,0.0005306299,0.0004653489,0.0005470755,0.00049112557],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99791783,0.0006514878,0.00019444952,0.00022274762,0.0007563507,0.0002571546],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016945784,0.00021779249,0.0002546203,0.0001498167,0.0002345293,0.0003300557,0.0005672171,0.00046526844,0.004073814],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012224788,0.00033084815,0.00030541467,0.0002671971,0.0002668487,0.0007702199,0.00016881798,0.00058179727,0.0002513983],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027072547,0.00039939838,0.004710311,0.0001150275,0.00015488999,0.0004587792,0.007162449,0.0001571729,0.0007916381,0.934009,0.0033910016,0.04862326],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00051331386,0.000048217073,0.018030902,0.00052574195,0.000069670095,0.0009140698,0.00150685,0.005932338,0.0004529352,0.097933844,0.8737382,0.00033390895],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013056167,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001535902,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8703472,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023772565,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00066187244,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99991435},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3191512495","doi":"","title":"Privacy, Eh! The Impact of Canada's Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act on Transnational Business","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment & Technology Law","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Internet privacy; Personally identifiable information; Business; Information privacy; Data Protection Act 1998; Electronic surveillance; Privacy protection; Privacy policy; Business information; Public relations; Computer security; Political science; Computer science; Marketing","score_opus":0.009539611023522526,"score_gpt":0.2509941445194883,"score_spread":0.2414545334959658,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3191512495","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.966842,0.00013392523,0.0003584254,0.030070523,0.00012651525,0.00029230642,0.0000037686157,0.000013824249,0.0021587422],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995706,0.00022406022,0.000009146448,0.000096312935,0.000040391144,0.000006847545,9.761932e-7,0.000003624932,0.000048015354],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99885505,0.00005876108,0.0003138626,0.000068042595,0.00047932312,0.00022498514],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992814,0.000037065052,0.00034532943,0.00007424827,0.0002170608,0.00004489679],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004007152,0.000095160576,0.0001396723,0.00016005423,0.00034463423,0.00003836807,0.0001808099,0.0000945484,0.00013308336],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000048725225,0.00006383049,0.00006711576,0.00025304614,0.00019001692,0.00038394373,0.000015512447,0.00025259572,3.3600287e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0017024715,0.0017286381,0.038728435,0.00013021422,0.00209343,0.00003139494,0.040405627,0.0012578588,0.00611214,0.70686895,0.0040909164,0.19684993],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.014221299,0.009219931,0.16677028,0.0005595122,0.00041716758,0.00074307213,0.013152285,0.004471358,0.0063294168,0.044819888,0.738031,0.0012647755],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016395373,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.027687985,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7339401,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000543024,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00028187924,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9901545},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3192949206","doi":"","title":"Comparative Analysis of Unitary Authorities in the UK, Canada and New Zealand","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Korean Society and Public Administration","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Unitary state; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.04051871764160269,"score_gpt":0.3098881204086471,"score_spread":0.2693694027670444,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3192949206","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9724734,0.00017103303,0.00003294402,0.02138218,0.000021368223,0.00008542162,0.00002142021,0.0000059780978,0.0058062705],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986568,0.00020138526,0.00009391819,0.0002623403,0.00010919634,0.0000022522852,0.00005179716,9.224475e-7,0.0006213616],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.999372,0.000090076835,0.00014130124,0.00009107668,0.00019916755,0.00010637631],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99963033,0.00014226462,0.000062721774,0.000054522217,0.00004264575,0.000067523186],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004343493,0.000051268868,0.000120761215,0.000027678117,0.00023414729,0.00007786338,0.000056516677,0.000049351474,0.000045694636],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000016558286,0.000041911757,0.000035278186,0.00040855905,0.00015901455,0.00017258606,0.0000069996095,0.000071497205,5.0158203e-8],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031266063,0.000105497376,0.38634992,0.000012963101,0.00043414,0.0000014944882,0.34578598,0.000018315553,0.00001849841,0.21052384,0.041472156,0.015245941],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030503672,0.00008361228,0.5373765,0.000006713774,0.00018629346,0.0000013438937,0.13835493,0.0009972983,0.00001713065,0.0005906163,0.32194304,0.00013744406],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5174432,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98490894,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4674658,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000036295965,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00061428803,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.48577023},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3194409652","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198868958.003.0003","title":"The Distant Shore: Discretion and the Extent of Judicial Jurisdiction","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Law; Club; Discretion; Shore; Subject (documents); Political science","score_opus":0.016508602960436786,"score_gpt":0.22936025309351019,"score_spread":0.2128516501330734,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3194409652","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00022710364,0.00050710083,0.0005478951,0.0006886381,0.00041229965,0.0003916599,0.00003480325,0.000029790595,0.99716073],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.03216219,0.011040057,0.000011512065,0.00002038298,0.00027224183,0.0000013982535,0.000013465368,0.000014246873,0.9564645],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989204,0.00013071181,0.00016837793,0.0002145408,0.0004084381,0.00015757112],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99913734,0.00017568219,0.0002445076,0.00023632226,0.00014258432,0.00006354464],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00047088088,0.00013736224,0.00021291735,0.000034046283,0.0012149166,0.000082623,0.00023768269,0.00019524484,0.000025676087],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000013820378,0.00009779675,0.00017093398,0.0000110754345,0.0014780917,0.00006103277,0.00013491065,0.00024528586,9.477113e-8],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023958935,0.000004115583,0.0000023363223,0.000008548359,0.00006842687,0.0000052565883,0.0036179477,7.0200997e-7,0.0000030587414,0.96749115,0.00014901269,0.028409883],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00040740226,0.000026262049,0.00004441314,0.00007108741,0.00020834719,8.8018794e-7,0.0013702372,0.000031138432,0.000009444553,0.0036489617,0.994073,0.00010887286],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011768405,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017735916,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99392396,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010232742,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000119067445,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9344279},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3195987185","doi":"","title":"Global Trends in Mediation, Second Edition","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mediation; Salient; Alternative dispute resolution; Perspective (graphical); Political science; Dispute resolution; Table (database); Lawyer supported mediation; Table of contents; Law; Regional science; Sociology; Dispute mechanism; Computer science; Data mining; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.0055187686675281945,"score_gpt":0.2712215027718405,"score_spread":0.2657027341043123,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3195987185","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7256419,0.0015457893,0.0017945693,0.007628603,0.001177714,0.000085331245,0.000008206294,0.00006800583,0.2620499],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9925561,0.0004602594,0.000009781426,0.000047393078,0.0021961932,0.0000021286628,0.000011061046,0.000003892145,0.00471319],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982358,0.000096241776,0.00019600576,0.0000986556,0.0003009698,0.001072304],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99974465,0.00001544489,0.000095095,0.00004376018,0.000056135752,0.000044922752],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014977463,0.00006130936,0.00007804704,0.00012141245,0.0002992144,0.000066027336,0.00010647087,0.0000788049,0.00042115507],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000018391966,0.00006250158,0.000055930504,0.000464172,0.000046201334,0.0002978908,0.000005927196,0.00039846142,0.000012245952],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001516064,0.000059510454,0.02558264,5.754813e-7,0.000010936839,0.0000023730468,0.0005356528,0.000027539209,0.000019481651,0.8967839,0.0025447723,0.07441747],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007440382,0.000097037264,0.16975956,0.0000054942825,0.00000990263,0.000035053625,0.002092204,0.000024699975,0.0000072268413,0.5470378,0.28003958,0.00014741087],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003218298,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.37930572,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.37608743,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017224795,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00097643654,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6320203},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3197683296","doi":"10.29173/mlj795","title":"Legal Research in Canada's Provincial Appellate Courts","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law","score_opus":0.09364104594505025,"score_gpt":0.3204198856045571,"score_spread":0.22677883965950685,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3197683296","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5941357,0.000054832588,0.000007770925,0.0010618339,0.00085211935,0.00013017053,0.0000018594077,0.0000106434,0.40374509],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984501,0.000057876296,0.000043032618,0.000116120595,0.0011654319,0.000002839269,3.4416067e-7,0.000008777864,0.00015547467],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978305,0.00035572643,0.00024113487,0.00013243724,0.0008844838,0.0005557177],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99937683,0.00004534392,0.00006961521,0.0000933677,0.00019141685,0.00022344466],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022145875,0.00007218884,0.000112591115,0.00009769706,0.0012373416,0.00016560858,0.0002901354,0.00006244444,0.00039568328],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000030175755,0.00006949408,0.00003579183,0.00018478572,0.00017815611,0.00025914266,0.000045024666,0.00061682955,0.000030062283],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00029629926,0.00025643103,0.0761961,0.000019127081,0.00004599054,0.002890939,0.019527517,0.000010420952,0.00008481194,0.6058549,0.0100974245,0.28472],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00038809777,0.00007622932,0.036544707,0.000044466957,0.000005880859,0.00005804363,0.033016786,0.000018029987,0.000112763904,0.0073571554,0.92221093,0.00016688216],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99949044,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99998146,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91211355,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011713081,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025536264,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9516756},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3200511077","doi":"","title":"146 Cong. Rec. 3040 - TRIBUTE TO MICHAEL S. McGILL","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"govinfo.gov","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tribute; Art; Art history","score_opus":0.01671313624895357,"score_gpt":0.30000338478977606,"score_spread":0.2832902485408225,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3200511077","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.34075657,0.0001550853,0.000046803463,0.029334567,0.00090087455,0.00053390727,0.00018120982,0.00033790708,0.6277531],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6975091,0.0006542629,0.00045197434,0.0060808645,0.0011910829,0.00005339107,0.00003089399,0.000033965738,0.2939945],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99843407,0.0000867644,0.0002661484,0.00028554373,0.00043946135,0.00048800194],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991895,0.00007853314,0.000060652354,0.0002615938,0.00009520685,0.00031451377],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005383771,0.00014001141,0.00019804189,0.00005970886,0.00070366164,0.00008499386,0.00029038786,0.00014874288,0.0066604842],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008463265,0.00014428562,0.00010604173,0.0003836791,0.00011367626,0.00025191414,0.000037797152,0.00013314314,0.0024138323],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014786988,0.00011585697,0.00095941697,0.000011530496,0.000048950245,0.000025290557,0.012001693,0.000021367458,0.00048472497,0.015376747,0.23349132,0.73731524],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029104095,0.000077721874,0.0035053054,0.000016022872,0.000014571672,0.0000017719017,0.00040353282,0.000018877518,0.00016590694,0.00034112553,0.9949636,0.00020052775],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011250919,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008503027,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7614723,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015610407,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000099106685,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9983629},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3202452705","doi":"10.1080/17441048.2021.1958482","title":"Characterisation and liberative prescription (the limitation of actions) in private international law – Canadian doctrine in the Eswatini courts (the phenomenon of dual cumulation)","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Private International Law","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Doctrine; Supreme court; Phenomenon; Law; Conflict of laws; Dual (grammatical number); Political science; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.036954648326038356,"score_gpt":0.31738019525574357,"score_spread":0.2804255469297052,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3202452705","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9562343,0.000053885982,0.00013627401,0.030043546,0.0007076731,0.00022811437,0.000017605775,0.0000029524394,0.012575651],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984692,0.00027290054,0.00018176957,0.0004534839,0.00036018147,0.000008748683,0.000036089736,0.000005621245,0.00021202299],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99803495,0.00036048662,0.0006927247,0.000111379246,0.0006757759,0.00012466121],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981921,0.00034878284,0.000683429,0.00010507653,0.0006279547,0.000042710355],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016033241,0.00008756662,0.00015158809,0.0001809121,0.00019555679,0.00012880524,0.00029449194,0.00006323137,0.00011733062],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002656387,0.0000608127,0.00006810171,0.00024400091,0.00022574243,0.00081857614,0.000037150352,0.0002568569,0.0000015102335],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010120771,0.00014224152,0.013250582,0.000007179613,0.00009059535,0.0000104501105,0.026297506,0.0006257242,0.0040207948,0.952457,0.000042271,0.0029544283],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017386335,0.0001436662,0.6479487,0.00024171891,0.000059751317,0.000058672493,0.005520204,0.0020226054,0.0022588125,0.03943668,0.30038404,0.00018651762],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011849808,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0743838,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9130203,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025469452,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001960529,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99473035},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3203035535","doi":"","title":"Contractual governance in ‘a world of broad regions’","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Corporate governance; Business; Computer science; Finance","score_opus":0.018752859348815806,"score_gpt":0.2674813241001151,"score_spread":0.24872846475129928,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3203035535","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10206278,0.002225248,0.013633068,0.061919138,0.0006991399,0.0007968167,0.00012270157,0.00019425889,0.81834686],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9592326,0.002234674,0.0017585998,0.00006698107,0.000063058,0.000039013965,0.000034701214,0.00002124369,0.036549125],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9943486,0.0036859503,0.000559823,0.0004974358,0.0005631088,0.0003450753],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9952082,0.0016460635,0.00071825937,0.0010716898,0.0012181321,0.00013766173],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005781916,0.00019858823,0.0003687616,0.00017057353,0.00025539956,0.00013717054,0.00096062664,0.00026149277,0.00040879936],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018565374,0.00020162757,0.0001814138,0.00041389585,0.0005519064,0.00016559749,0.00047979612,0.0004538064,0.000020754935],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021881391,0.0003441122,0.0064757545,0.00005323348,0.00003114457,0.0000036686276,0.027079526,0.000005691777,0.0004442209,0.8983004,0.0019222371,0.06531812],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014604278,6.1525566e-7,0.06653974,0.00739762,0.00005028674,0.0000018257043,0.0006255167,0.0004932974,0.009858908,0.046383947,0.8663945,0.0007932939],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01624244,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09651062,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86447227,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024068145,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005729158,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99030846},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3203512638","doi":"","title":"New romanian choice-of-law rules on marriage effects","year":2012,"lang":"ro","type":"article","venue":"Analele Științifice ale Universităţii Alexandru Ioan Cuza din Iași, seria Ştiinţe Juridice","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Romanian; Law; Choice of law; Private law; Civil code; Political science; Paragraph; Conflict of laws; Jurisdiction; Civil law (Civil law); Comparative law; Public law; Municipal law; Settlement (finance); Sociology; Economics","score_opus":0.022262466043608747,"score_gpt":0.28105062847050005,"score_spread":0.2587881624268913,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3203512638","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.68446845,0.004682133,0.00017683762,0.002370545,0.005311493,0.0015604834,0.00027486018,0.0003708276,0.30078435],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95505863,0.0028242802,0.00056491006,0.0008066466,0.0049030897,0.000012484927,0.00018216066,0.00016914282,0.03547865],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9917269,0.0011231502,0.0011951963,0.0014962238,0.001957089,0.0025014582],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99299675,0.0018194489,0.0013427734,0.0015121643,0.00041186364,0.0019170068],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001531719,0.0012687423,0.0015539657,0.0007708307,0.0022926927,0.00039904242,0.001863431,0.0010206659,0.0034392923],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002742821,0.0014671854,0.0009334398,0.0016884055,0.0009644782,0.0031012525,0.00047407203,0.0010898372,0.0014045333],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0031397415,0.005365801,0.054970622,0.0022012226,0.003643833,0.00042891252,0.08034581,0.00014882447,0.02300399,0.59733105,0.18194842,0.047471765],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0035952427,0.0010573562,0.036677178,0.0009250525,0.00144883,0.000015886377,0.004769154,0.00006579302,0.008339292,0.00028629776,0.940987,0.0018329143],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.031974107,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005095694,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.75903857,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00084028085,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008039863,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99937296},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W320397684","doi":"","title":"A Rational Thinking of the People's Mediation System of China/UNE PENSEE RATIONNELLE DU SYSTEME DE LA MEDIATION POPULAIRE DE CHINE","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian social science","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mediation; Political science; China; Humanities; Alternative dispute resolution; Social harmony; Sociology; Welfare economics; Law; Philosophy; Economics; Social science","score_opus":0.006671650982445831,"score_gpt":0.2511180785501751,"score_spread":0.24444642756772927,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W320397684","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94646186,0.00006296371,0.0005465497,0.0029142299,0.000769395,0.00030320682,0.000023558667,0.000027671236,0.04889055],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990161,0.000009266029,0.00006276528,0.000054041095,0.00079349516,0.000010356732,0.0000056213603,0.000004895564,0.00004344278],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982422,0.00033100872,0.00023596646,0.00011003887,0.0007287791,0.0003519985],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99911994,0.00009822412,0.0002720584,0.00008949818,0.00019161585,0.00022868498],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0040796897,0.000066570654,0.00012472869,0.00011200014,0.0020999096,0.00006452766,0.00034273308,0.00010354668,0.00003521171],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005270449,0.000058966318,0.000060297934,0.0010186885,0.0005242143,0.00044744578,0.000019159434,0.00008670001,0.0000014207604],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000025572047,0.000013922989,0.3339484,0.00002950717,0.000004722686,2.3559319e-7,0.17360993,0.000025938794,0.0009379176,0.490766,0.00015861737,0.0005022734],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015146944,0.000008437089,0.9755565,0.00003978431,0.000017882157,0.0000034351285,0.019969424,0.0008123039,0.00017391726,0.00055530167,0.0026156984,0.00009583288],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.21719201,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.27622488,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6416081,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012259061,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026119293,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991992},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3204000247","doi":"","title":"The Canadian Supreme Court of British Columbia certifies a class action subject to a requirement for the plaintiff to redraft pleadings to conform to several key court holdings (MasterCard / Visa / Watson / Bank of America)","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"e-Competitions Bulletin","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Plaintiff; Supreme court; Class action; Law; Political science; Subject (documents); Business; Computer science; State (computer science); Library science","score_opus":0.02332223736837245,"score_gpt":0.2742732645562077,"score_spread":0.25095102718783524,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3204000247","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6366914,0.000030160163,0.005277408,0.32694632,0.0014769792,0.004574722,0.0007092388,0.00012163748,0.024172107],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9832398,0.000029683322,0.0014008067,0.0031898152,0.00031290462,0.0004138884,0.000018048302,0.000026234105,0.011368782],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99783504,0.00011784339,0.00048902555,0.00035127997,0.0006065532,0.0006002582],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979671,0.0004404202,0.00018016632,0.00034999583,0.000612774,0.00044954833],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014750034,0.00014180134,0.0003088881,0.00013075444,0.0016994199,0.0005389787,0.0004939429,0.00009361239,0.0010482242],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006148607,0.00015874786,0.00015851998,0.00047269216,0.0002319613,0.00007401699,0.000082329876,0.00013272099,0.00011065445],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000274928,0.00009498024,0.00070785434,0.000045750287,0.00011327028,0.0000014059332,0.038500194,0.0004026405,0.0034827702,0.004801462,0.93555796,0.016016815],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023759986,0.00044838202,0.0102356635,0.00016157502,0.00003606992,0.0000026460752,0.006590731,0.000084035324,0.00022492313,0.000066144115,0.98171055,0.00020170081],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7610911,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9626887,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3465484,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00052176864,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024898603,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99986494},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3205219429","doi":"","title":"Revisiting the Double Actionability Rule in Singapore: Time for a Change","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Criticism; Law; Rule of law; Political science; Subject (documents); Common law; Law and economics; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.03274959011869361,"score_gpt":0.32676646133365256,"score_spread":0.29401687121495895,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3205219429","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8804511,0.0051593473,0.0009043505,0.097271495,0.0005297519,0.00059792906,0.0000035456571,0.000054100463,0.0150283985],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99088144,0.0019458663,0.00004676794,0.00019463369,0.0026121757,0.000029380082,0.0000035246953,0.000009051515,0.0042771674],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998354,0.00014672024,0.00016984493,0.0001254897,0.00020639611,0.0009975447],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995261,0.000116770745,0.00009288203,0.00008491384,0.00013996632,0.000039382798],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0043488233,0.0000575682,0.00009737685,0.000030302486,0.0008057611,0.000106380736,0.00012162539,0.000054451026,0.00011364298],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015987866,0.00004666158,0.000097063305,0.00023639562,0.00004995504,0.00022663409,0.000017137161,0.0006192755,0.000009016022],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017288748,0.000099821846,0.008629421,0.00001539631,0.00007782411,0.0000047952326,0.012194892,0.000011935426,0.0009908885,0.45810986,0.00010698781,0.5195853],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017527214,0.0000849496,0.013985194,0.00007193061,0.00004955166,0.000112049886,0.019331185,0.00019118223,0.00017236511,0.39730713,0.5666753,0.00026644146],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00083737244,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005282533,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5665683,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00092043844,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018309251,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.61973447},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3207233330","doi":"","title":"International Comity and the Construction of the Charter's Limits: Hape Revisited","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Comity; Law; Political science; Jurisdiction; International law; Jurisprudence; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.005612957396643109,"score_gpt":0.2450747189055387,"score_spread":0.2394617615088956,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3207233330","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8987995,0.0005355238,0.00023438445,0.022812972,0.0007577245,0.00024153022,0.0000017052778,0.000012217767,0.076604486],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9933715,0.0034974976,0.00000824999,0.00009866411,0.0002327396,7.2782615e-7,3.1031428e-7,0.000002838478,0.0027874785],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990551,0.000163172,0.00014531898,0.00006486841,0.00024873094,0.0003228118],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995552,0.000071923074,0.00018007685,0.00007694876,0.000095514646,0.00002034182],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019003373,0.0000438097,0.000083826606,0.000024732492,0.00031124012,0.000050120027,0.00019793342,0.00003762293,0.00009903416],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000063243024,0.000025106776,0.00006952954,0.00007864172,0.00030287844,0.00012349867,0.000020900781,0.00050036435,0.0000043378436],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005346227,0.000006214881,0.014503296,9.940616e-7,0.00005360719,3.388612e-8,0.0011490121,6.607757e-7,0.00009361076,0.9630328,0.000021804255,0.021084493],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0046673273,0.00019341399,0.041242987,0.00011321333,0.00012742184,0.00028006852,0.018382972,0.00044698673,0.00010921662,0.5792316,0.35497496,0.00022982927],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00015196562,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00040201165,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3838012,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018476688,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00044294045,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23938388},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3208203523","doi":"","title":"International Negotiable Instruments (Introduction)","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Negotiable instrument; Scope (computer science); Law; Statute; Business; Political science; Law and economics; Computer science; Economics","score_opus":0.011761471826403323,"score_gpt":0.26615372621622424,"score_spread":0.25439225438982094,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3208203523","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.29097974,0.00058039435,0.008831777,0.5029262,0.005449208,0.0002613158,0.000003284538,0.00022285276,0.19074523],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9826668,0.003688378,0.00006838257,0.000537898,0.0077760196,0.0000016358696,0.0000030061817,0.000008517782,0.0052493676],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99831486,0.00006413825,0.00015727391,0.00013499561,0.0003819584,0.00094677525],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996348,0.000008036458,0.000088525914,0.000047153124,0.000093054754,0.00012842975],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007812869,0.000064009764,0.00007467728,0.000041156083,0.00048833486,0.0001269753,0.0002556384,0.00004398886,0.0009964283],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011161812,0.000064416585,0.00006687664,0.00016426029,0.000053630785,0.00041593894,0.000023794075,0.00073044363,0.00012566704],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007167522,0.000051515286,0.0044940365,0.0000013473681,0.00016239293,0.0000016285386,0.0043407143,0.000033216515,0.00037868862,0.8221049,0.0050299,0.16333],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031093234,0.00008921975,0.00020215708,0.0000017902437,0.0000108767945,0.000021262407,0.0042605014,0.00006221523,0.000030289977,0.020706516,0.97422856,0.000075663505],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00027034007,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00047578465,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9691987,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00060239114,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010896912,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999168},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3208426249","doi":"","title":"The Ottawa Convention and its role in settling international lease finance contract disputes","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Basic Education College Magazine For Educational and Humanities Sciences","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Lease; Convention; Business; Finance; Law; Law and economics; Economics; Political science","score_opus":0.03248245415034241,"score_gpt":0.3081284826120781,"score_spread":0.2756460284617357,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3208426249","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.74966127,0.0042291638,0.000015870022,0.19730188,0.0023158945,0.0007483344,0.000090093716,0.000023790735,0.045613714],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98636115,0.00065709185,0.00014372058,0.0010685816,0.0013473697,0.00017813167,0.000025097821,0.0000043140803,0.010214572],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990627,0.000056196302,0.00022763191,0.00023586469,0.00024340294,0.0001742019],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990504,0.0005085589,0.00012286924,0.000036467558,0.00021694918,0.000064774526],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00063341093,0.00008400242,0.000086039996,0.00007781217,0.0016157863,0.00030902863,0.00018057399,0.000030294359,0.00014142857],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00040379024,0.00007286249,0.000028551798,0.00018426591,0.00045618176,0.00052072253,0.000023926412,0.000063275875,0.0000070960928],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016054324,0.00007032778,0.0048091235,0.000013712116,0.00000460755,5.455537e-8,0.00815032,0.0000058349165,0.000042442516,0.97732794,0.0050793807,0.004480228],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002525771,0.00006801231,0.047310032,0.000036984617,0.0000090552,0.000001730893,0.020746103,0.0016957527,0.000016340233,0.016411813,0.9133234,0.00012819225],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00027684093,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025959744,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9609161,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005386979,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009054712,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999684},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3211474663","doi":"","title":"University of New Brunswick Law Journal","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of New Brunswick Law Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":125,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.029468113813380343,"score_gpt":0.24319566050455477,"score_spread":0.2137275466911744,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3211474663","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.42646596,0.001252838,0.020971244,0.08696822,0.0016547871,0.00045492934,0.000014264268,0.00018139131,0.46203637],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9840463,0.0019462925,0.003083565,0.0005243014,0.0013097764,6.352167e-10,0.0000020992377,0.000016009311,0.009071661],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981972,0.00022023558,0.00027095975,0.00020233597,0.000728015,0.00038124764],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976763,0.000067103974,0.00059919717,0.00013827872,0.00036738307,0.00115173],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005024235,0.00015451087,0.000379527,0.000094487645,0.0022110688,0.00007948207,0.0008107883,0.00018921611,0.0027057217],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000038084836,0.00019182313,0.00038279034,0.00036274313,0.000622107,0.00088060537,0.00012530884,0.00063098123,0.00004519996],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0012579542,0.00024522,0.009627915,0.000044788212,0.0005005485,0.00067493727,0.12273186,0.00029387113,0.0005711646,0.77239466,0.06836241,0.023294654],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0021215428,0.00028213212,0.0040247934,0.00007670303,0.00014970131,0.00006178682,0.027466355,0.000033298096,0.00006380962,0.0011754414,0.9643476,0.00019682272],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3205291,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4071996,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8959852,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019580238,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037865113,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990879},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W334472714","doi":"","title":"The Chinese Legal System: Globalization and Local Legal Culture","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":138,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Legal research; Legal culture; Political science; Law; Legal profession; China; Human rights; Legal realism; Globalization; Context (archaeology); Law and economics; Sociology; Geography","score_opus":0.007253728114567884,"score_gpt":0.2596272134548995,"score_spread":0.2523734853403316,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W334472714","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00027302484,0.004407109,0.00037728995,0.0010746261,0.0016470149,0.0005253688,0.000041676918,0.00024906918,0.99140483],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.050965473,0.0020308385,0.000023213343,0.0003797725,0.0041614184,0.000027815538,0.00010076878,0.000041121897,0.94226956],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976934,0.00021478727,0.00038343194,0.0004405267,0.000822109,0.000445703],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987966,0.000076412456,0.0002482926,0.00034244388,0.00022740879,0.00030883093],"candidate_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007053816,0.000331891,0.0003537661,0.000036073718,0.0022339707,0.0010478994,0.0004063478,0.00061361183,0.00012908407],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000076689365,0.00023614924,0.0001591969,0.0002138171,0.00068279053,0.0004892343,0.00009527018,0.00053595507,0.00014257782],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028441733,0.000012702779,0.00014565836,0.000052256808,0.000053799493,0.000034025077,0.0005368949,0.000008089335,0.0000015604963,0.92654365,0.06944739,0.0031355147],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026220139,0.00004361783,0.0001687864,0.0001656697,0.0000688195,0.000027696222,0.00059570535,0.000046330162,5.3209556e-7,0.001989732,0.996346,0.00028491794],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0151400855,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06704051,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9268986,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006462775,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005575982,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999891},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W338844312","doi":"","title":"Lessons for the Hague: Internet Jurisdiction in Contract and Tort Cases in the European Community and the United States, 23 J. Marshall J. Computer & Info. L. 1 (2004)","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"UIC Law Open Access Repository (University of Illinois at Chicago)","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Tort; Political science; Law; The Internet; Conflict of laws; Computer science; Liability","score_opus":0.04574332797324318,"score_gpt":0.31074261406364556,"score_spread":0.26499928609040235,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W338844312","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97646433,0.00024872812,0.00031043563,0.010112204,0.00014210961,0.0010863454,0.000022367827,0.000018744662,0.011594749],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981089,0.0008394804,0.000038074275,0.0005594124,0.00006074296,0.00000354457,0.00003103076,0.0000071876834,0.0003516118],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978785,0.0013174508,0.00021557481,0.00019086707,0.00020913378,0.00018847955],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982514,0.0010668217,0.0002197344,0.00030348115,0.00010281587,0.000055784472],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002550421,0.00011924917,0.00021540694,0.000060525457,0.0019184032,0.0005058588,0.0013443606,0.00007332858,0.000011431087],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000034133383,0.00008002713,0.000056325014,0.0002722751,0.001208518,0.0007204222,0.0007355381,0.0003485452,7.719722e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0037102075,0.0012009776,0.07057001,0.00016517792,0.00046329442,0.00034581765,0.6125389,0.0034896755,0.00010426463,0.28013417,0.0050779576,0.022199564],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007277488,0.00021449725,0.7171949,0.00020870274,0.0001624531,0.00005955191,0.024921117,0.002177986,0.00004265048,0.0012572096,0.24615979,0.00032361096],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.484771,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.33867475,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6466249,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015465776,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000066251174,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99938095},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W368303738","doi":"","title":"Family law arbitration in Canada","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Carswell eBooks","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Arbitration; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.023305016297701854,"score_gpt":0.2454259611486881,"score_spread":0.22212094485098624,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W368303738","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0014257092,0.0006092991,0.0000033179758,0.00005600633,0.0013010403,0.00030877453,0.000019172126,0.000033766784,0.99624294],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.15636678,0.00005741188,0.000009596206,0.001357595,0.0012641029,0.000020104582,0.000039101924,0.00003017729,0.8408551],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986075,0.00007911352,0.0002584458,0.00021241125,0.00046959778,0.00037292132],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993993,0.00006340272,0.00012580243,0.00019070628,0.00006497943,0.00015578394],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00031965956,0.00016966618,0.00023921559,0.000057633282,0.00020198835,0.000045007502,0.00018427928,0.0002807198,0.00010221575],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000072788985,0.00019347605,0.000069403,0.000023818822,0.00012577864,0.00006240351,0.00002493943,0.0003580187,0.000030348972],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001459268,0.00001252546,0.00023394632,0.00005310953,0.000034359568,0.000049672428,0.012276545,0.000003566273,0.00006571485,0.8854569,0.078644566,0.023154482],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009960666,0.0000069450602,0.00020021603,0.0000584342,0.000020888136,3.9686768e-7,0.00035800826,0.000001930679,0.000015312697,0.0034628992,0.9955655,0.0002098792],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9903166,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9992366,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9169209,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022330852,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0072604893,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9983674},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W369612255","doi":"10.5287/ora-kky0xak7k","title":"The constitution of Canada and the conflict of laws","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Royal Bank of Canada; Drexel University","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Law; Political science; Constitution; Judicial review; Adjudication; Economic Justice; Judicial independence; Politics","score_opus":0.012622205939634515,"score_gpt":0.28352127929154747,"score_spread":0.27089907335191293,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W369612255","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06265339,0.0010859569,0.0000059941785,0.0011469272,0.0006455308,0.00029312828,0.000007879631,0.000006609769,0.93415457],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9058179,0.0037552507,0.0000033040244,0.00004701841,0.000081751794,0.000008445795,0.000018297533,0.0000027900155,0.09026524],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99919605,0.00009134599,0.00021726948,0.00007165381,0.0003213769,0.00010230788],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99912995,0.00032878225,0.00022909312,0.00009691605,0.00018750045,0.000027761458],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00062953593,0.000061172905,0.00014863035,0.000014179301,0.00051809923,0.000022497878,0.0001205252,0.00008288835,0.00008803671],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013634101,0.000032770222,0.000039901322,0.00009038786,0.0006117186,0.000027324266,0.0000056856757,0.0000781637,1.770488e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000989391,0.000004917619,0.00018223669,0.000016117698,0.000035001336,2.9474455e-7,0.0064030183,9.746462e-7,0.000017489565,0.9829247,0.0022457086,0.00807063],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033552764,0.000010933234,0.0025761141,0.000035851783,0.000048404323,3.931191e-7,0.018555371,0.000011933181,0.00022189226,0.0011795248,0.97696066,0.000063410866],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95183986,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9956386,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9817451,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000030514773,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011578447,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3984853},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W378134884","doi":"","title":"判例から見る仲裁法(35)仲裁判断の取消手続と承認・執行手続との関係[Dalimpex Ltd. v. Janicki, 64 O.R. (3d) 737, Ontario Court of Appeal, May 30, 2003]","year":2008,"lang":"ja","type":"article","venue":"JCAジャーナル","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.030519824114746793,"score_gpt":0.2802264896142281,"score_spread":0.24970666549948128,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W378134884","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6988887,0.0030550226,0.00011614953,0.0055541964,0.0056812684,0.0014396479,0.00016845712,0.00027131027,0.28482527],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8964542,0.0032094505,0.00034934553,0.0007337701,0.0017952526,0.000032920456,0.00004622128,0.00008389545,0.09729492],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99361616,0.00041292724,0.0014695699,0.0010835908,0.0019252928,0.0014924463],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99635684,0.0001836147,0.0009250894,0.0010581308,0.0007789635,0.0006973303],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013472729,0.00072891475,0.0011715378,0.00028143454,0.0015767624,0.00017076285,0.0010653583,0.0008895576,0.0134748975],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019684754,0.0007601525,0.00053136685,0.0014017363,0.0013004786,0.0006615323,0.00029621704,0.0009782529,0.001528845],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00062007504,0.0033709134,0.095771596,0.00029534078,0.0011048745,0.0005377852,0.3189757,0.00016370966,0.0019755245,0.011717752,0.54534215,0.020124592],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014600067,0.00057260477,0.054774173,0.0002198508,0.00022726816,0.00003588605,0.0034874487,0.00019199269,0.00040193342,0.00010110959,0.937662,0.0008657069],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.20441763,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09684393,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3923199,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009009487,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024806554,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997231},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W39164428","doi":"10.1038/s41598-024-69782-w","title":"Le mariage en droit gabonais : étude comparative entre droit écrit et règles coutumières","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Crown-Indigenous Relations and Northern Affairs Canada","keywords":"Humanities; Ethnology; French; Political science; Art; Sociology","score_opus":0.017306979397410462,"score_gpt":0.35851382249239805,"score_spread":0.3412068430949876,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W39164428","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13170522,0.0002622837,0.00016082478,0.0010035774,0.0009760087,0.00056786597,0.000039705264,0.00022981015,0.8650547],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8694083,0.00079867936,0.00018421489,0.0002850071,0.00055499026,0.000034112694,0.0009637201,0.000034288067,0.12773666],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99745715,0.00021574211,0.00046603818,0.00049644616,0.00087443617,0.0004901796],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99860084,0.00039774677,0.00026761615,0.00022213605,0.00031350015,0.0001981619],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00090143067,0.00031637473,0.00050723087,0.00023339379,0.0006671187,0.00026699516,0.00040031743,0.00048883876,0.0020665],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008105365,0.00035351343,0.00022873239,0.00032222626,0.00014289356,0.00039410472,0.00003265855,0.0004598929,0.00018826047],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017033322,0.00025631403,0.0005159681,0.000059679085,0.00017212503,0.000024740466,0.1499271,0.0000056521058,0.0002436671,0.83043104,0.00941236,0.008780997],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006596008,0.00010526904,0.06426557,0.00017386573,0.00014519098,0.0000013731161,0.15138458,0.000035946443,0.0009836212,0.0059835576,0.7753869,0.00087449554],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.033523366,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4423229,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8244475,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018808225,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00086694304,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998917},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4200141961","doi":"10.1139/cjfas-2021-0251","title":"Note of appreciation","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Biology; Ecology; Geography","score_opus":0.02622736210860282,"score_gpt":0.2724147902642348,"score_spread":0.246187428155632,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4200141961","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9359561,0.0013342263,0.00044627307,0.0141412355,0.0007633444,0.000036949597,0.0000021616352,0.0000021169546,0.04731759],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983502,0.00020383515,0.0008335526,0.00011511189,0.00012513614,1.7825955e-7,1.8327894e-7,0.0000012212587,0.00037059293],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99936014,0.000058608894,0.00018391946,0.00005610042,0.00021396844,0.00012725077],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994249,0.00009779845,0.00015107646,0.00003202073,0.000101903315,0.00019231002],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007661387,0.000031995856,0.0000997539,0.000077225784,0.00040444304,0.00012220524,0.00009782282,0.00002998608,0.00019797061],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005065158,0.000028141407,0.00003314527,0.0002966809,0.00057607837,0.00027426385,0.000003870628,0.000042667132,4.8874574e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010816795,0.00003055419,0.30808863,0.00003177596,0.00004096353,0.000071020775,0.11742023,0.00002273705,0.00083784224,0.0670736,0.0050320746,0.5013398],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003314831,0.00029620886,0.075624414,0.00016945369,0.000045306213,0.000043291653,0.03929231,0.00036058787,0.00086587673,0.01560139,0.8671788,0.00019088842],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016755436,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16314429,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86214674,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000027413256,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021549077,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98979205},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4200143573","doi":"10.1017/9781108894760.011","title":"Commensurability, Comparative Law, and Confucian Legal Tradition","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Commensurability (mathematics); Reification (Marxism); Law; Sociology; Political science; Environmental ethics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05643707234168038,"score_gpt":0.26055260707256284,"score_spread":0.20411553473088245,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4200143573","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0010547071,0.00013683303,0.00003246284,0.00026054966,0.00024909122,0.0003563126,0.000264017,0.000091101174,0.9975549],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.09088084,0.00014099323,0.00001831557,0.00021382421,0.00021278953,5.430295e-7,0.000082384446,0.000013078571,0.90843725],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988273,0.00014243332,0.00015027817,0.00039057026,0.00029064395,0.00019878658],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99909866,0.00011905599,0.00014679458,0.00022267638,0.00021217104,0.00020064715],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001927005,0.00021431818,0.00037292947,0.000062388404,0.000811421,0.00014172062,0.00017702338,0.00027407112,0.000017950957],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000039872466,0.00028064373,0.00013511462,0.000007997404,0.0010577906,0.00016079233,0.000114987,0.00039498505,0.0000034431464],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031649466,0.000010775362,0.0000018626996,0.00002201852,0.0000728349,0.00007954611,0.0011950998,1.4228135e-7,0.0000083405575,0.9910627,0.00664225,0.00087280315],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033059748,0.000041386607,0.000050873732,0.000089299145,0.00012639246,0.0000042181423,0.0007676341,0.000007752318,0.000035634388,0.00008310184,0.9981817,0.00028141317],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004719324,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009888959,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9915394,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022510371,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019509993,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999646},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4200303422","doi":"10.1017/9781009039406.010","title":"Appendix B: Cases","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Content (measure theory); Information retrieval; Link (geometry); World Wide Web; Database; Mathematics; Computer network","score_opus":0.03639975539055304,"score_gpt":0.33842787689419207,"score_spread":0.302028121503639,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4200303422","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000003987916,0.0012185464,0.00003068964,0.00056160527,0.00062882924,0.00007611986,0.0000055835953,0.00018179667,0.9972928],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00024434333,0.0009333717,0.000106724605,0.0001478452,0.00121868,0.0000032709677,0.000035013814,0.00006252259,0.99724823],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994952,0.000038854017,0.000049357306,0.00012379099,0.00017328969,0.000119493685],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997764,0.000022430908,0.000034834113,0.00010039732,0.000012508383,0.000053417396],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00007686324,0.000060026046,0.0000953171,0.000047924266,0.000091518006,0.000044733686,0.00007349457,0.00015850435,0.33727854],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000025593054,0.00005679058,0.000049699367,0.00007868939,0.000058934227,0.0000101344895,0.000017432973,0.000050860104,0.0006995392],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[2.320281e-7,0.000008325449,0.000045360368,0.0000053725576,0.000010434657,0.00002630861,0.00027066984,4.6339967e-9,8.3835744e-7,0.03265942,0.9606219,0.006351158],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026966683,0.000003822241,0.000012271151,0.00003610109,0.000006470042,0.0000011942685,0.00049006956,1.2863767e-7,0.0000016500966,0.000028162704,0.99931514,0.000078045545],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04818619,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.098771356,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.33657902,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000019820589,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010840881,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.958152},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4200363401","doi":"10.1017/9781108894760.002","title":"How to Do Comparative Law: Some Lessons to Be Learned","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Conciliation; Argument (complex analysis); Dream; Diversity (politics); Law; Sociology; Magnum opus; Political science; Art; Psychology; Mediation; Literature","score_opus":0.09708558413066343,"score_gpt":0.2964495488872397,"score_spread":0.19936396475657625,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4200363401","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0004600559,0.00012496178,0.00017895528,0.0054772,0.00043134455,0.00062986533,0.0002875147,0.00013181011,0.9922783],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0103689125,0.00008645688,0.0000797801,0.00085260853,0.00045510777,0.0000018800769,0.00003337451,0.000026197458,0.9880957],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981849,0.00011314557,0.00013028612,0.0006368245,0.0005383751,0.00039643873],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99846214,0.000093604314,0.00012819156,0.00042632152,0.00035490826,0.0005348537],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00018077878,0.0003026421,0.0004894737,0.00016735564,0.0008901329,0.0003576219,0.00053518696,0.00035943044,0.000023380586],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000015556396,0.00038937858,0.00023308278,0.000022163307,0.0003198097,0.00019320015,0.00042388157,0.00039121398,0.000028301092],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000053170777,0.000009742082,3.0552394e-7,0.000011360207,0.000091824324,0.000106658525,0.0047329497,0.0000029793562,0.00005622681,0.95739293,0.036430698,0.0011111483],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023215463,0.000065006985,0.00000915621,0.00011063722,0.00010593454,0.0000011103544,0.002363516,0.0000012792939,0.00018019888,0.000049003203,0.9964451,0.00043686182],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026685984,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009854661,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96001446,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00040872314,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002638032,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998558},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4200516249","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198863168.003.0014","title":"Hedge or Counterweight? New Constitutionalism and the Role of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms in Intellectual Property Litigation","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Intellectual property; Charter; Political science; Law; Government (linguistics); Fundamental rights; Law and economics; Human rights; Sociology; Democracy; Politics","score_opus":0.016722075310253603,"score_gpt":0.22905531180780486,"score_spread":0.21233323649755126,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4200516249","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0035506971,0.0011363745,0.000007251335,0.004036068,0.00020122346,0.00052660936,0.000036164267,0.000005159577,0.99050045],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6637659,0.00032850064,0.000012348072,0.00019416743,0.00017033068,0.0000042926285,0.000008097013,0.0000049580526,0.33551142],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992512,0.00005415683,0.00022183087,0.00013939482,0.00023474284,0.00009868659],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993977,0.00018893967,0.000096830125,0.000108251996,0.00013241016,0.00007585831],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00029561904,0.000095361705,0.00019942531,0.00006008493,0.00026398897,0.000046485064,0.00010526001,0.00016879168,0.0012698146],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007900715,0.000041150754,0.0000452937,0.000044184108,0.0017938092,0.00006508484,0.000033738943,0.0001389657,0.0000013300106],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023792543,0.0000032547612,0.00005670909,0.0000063762723,0.000022046072,7.52905e-7,0.018866947,9.57491e-8,0.000005769694,0.97846174,0.0006344555,0.0019180613],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00040834447,0.00001800799,0.00014893478,0.00020704248,0.000028887214,0.000004345385,0.0007248782,0.000044881766,0.00005393632,0.044855643,0.95341897,0.00008613467],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6589177,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9603262,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9527845,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000074578384,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013577115,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99964315},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4205147196","doi":"10.12987/9780300195071-012","title":"A Tamer Tort Law: The Canada- U.S. Divide","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Yale University Press eBooks","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tort; Law; Political science; Liability","score_opus":0.031125111752017497,"score_gpt":0.22987727637390012,"score_spread":0.19875216462188264,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4205147196","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000031898257,0.00008727992,0.000008238774,0.0005473025,0.0005264724,0.0002673081,0.00009000323,0.00005007026,0.99839145],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.011156873,0.00014662664,0.0000039312085,0.00020210193,0.00043525902,4.7292815e-7,0.000006605758,0.0000145333215,0.9880336],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988886,0.000044619548,0.00008996103,0.0002491793,0.00048623423,0.00024137362],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99898386,0.00007223986,0.00020157242,0.00048769414,0.00011709226,0.00013752714],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00017835935,0.00016534873,0.00019017712,0.000024906965,0.0021525754,0.0001121552,0.0007816216,0.0002212633,0.00015372365],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000010266104,0.00015600464,0.00012420236,0.0000017950465,0.0006934326,0.00008224149,0.00021719701,0.00029738696,0.000006260935],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012665249,0.0000021067858,0.0000059689814,0.000005773324,0.00006249133,0.00006358115,0.0013899221,3.308613e-7,5.956245e-7,0.96619827,0.027455138,0.004803148],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011290122,0.000008551818,0.000037005226,0.000045995486,0.00010399996,6.902612e-7,0.00011649517,8.589887e-7,0.000004024367,0.00060157204,0.9987756,0.00019228175],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.94616646,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9656978,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9713205,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00031086014,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008127021,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99914646},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4205466436","doi":"10.1093/ww/9780199540884.013.251417","title":"Barrie, Peter Anthony Stanfield, (born 12 March 1953), a Circuit Judge, since 2010; Resident Judge, Shrewsbury Crown Court, since 2010","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"reference-entry","venue":"Who's Who","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Crown (dentistry); Art; Art history; Materials science; Composite material","score_opus":0.03303782434266753,"score_gpt":0.29914342087819834,"score_spread":0.2661055965355308,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4205466436","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0069170943,0.01008119,0.0005114466,0.011052176,0.022474693,0.0024737013,0.0018374862,0.0006283768,0.94402385],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.024250004,0.11075967,0.00020574912,0.0016657322,0.012060443,0.00023261724,0.00049881934,0.00028287285,0.8500441],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9908023,0.0007294494,0.0014279165,0.0019312158,0.0030081673,0.00210098],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9944683,0.00078583637,0.001002702,0.0018615297,0.0008119031,0.0010697825],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.002345203,0.0011250549,0.001587836,0.0005802986,0.0021174678,0.00105419,0.0021515938,0.0028904793,0.006782394],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006446628,0.001140239,0.000704826,0.00064925384,0.0014427429,0.000829579,0.000565111,0.0040523205,0.00059467345],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018392735,0.00019785756,0.0018318772,0.00033996062,0.00019221976,0.00019699147,0.005910512,0.0000013295851,0.000088966764,0.005912951,0.95846933,0.026674056],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006897785,0.00019599403,0.017133962,0.0010559147,0.00022819998,0.000017240967,0.0005081362,0.000015448486,0.000061742256,0.0010207118,0.97774273,0.0013301562],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01804601,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.059410065,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10067847,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006041158,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033308405,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99998283},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4205494464","doi":"10.18356/5485fed0-en-fr","title":"No. 6672. United States of America and Canada","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"United Nations Treaty Series","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Geography","score_opus":0.010353346618598262,"score_gpt":0.23625720510373246,"score_spread":0.2259038584851342,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4205494464","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0032772636,0.00014943893,0.000010445891,0.0036177498,0.00033995128,0.00025667553,0.0009873832,0.00008317218,0.99127793],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0030877404,0.007822873,0.00039941416,0.0002464934,0.00017785098,0.000008601559,0.002056793,0.00003046306,0.98616976],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99905616,0.000034420173,0.00024116786,0.00017105333,0.0003427814,0.00015440724],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99835956,0.00026568602,0.00022129311,0.0001721069,0.0008693085,0.000112050824],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00007276463,0.00017661424,0.0002265601,0.001661835,0.0006234353,0.000049923718,0.00012063343,0.00022624148,0.0006368512],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017780084,0.00017909726,0.000041755236,0.00056754827,0.0006686809,0.00013118064,0.000029312923,0.00024606547,0.0000054919174],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000077030636,0.00005087511,0.00031053837,0.00007599145,0.0002948492,0.000017024397,0.010514393,0.000022412487,0.00005874572,0.9582293,0.02445468,0.0058941618],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011129496,0.000051122934,0.000090529364,0.000041488085,0.000065334476,0.0000011182059,0.00096729264,0.000011879385,0.000024429235,0.0013343376,0.9971301,0.00017108826],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9216351,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97346586,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9726754,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008411199,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00058225595,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.73033744},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4205624113","doi":"10.7202/1068170ar","title":"LOYOLA LAW SCHOOL INTERNATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS CLINIC","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue québécoise de droit international","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.028444325609672704,"score_gpt":0.3192340680291044,"score_spread":0.29078974241943173,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4205624113","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.095998086,0.000024911447,0.0004749398,0.020459456,0.0014746073,0.00017949911,0.000041207913,0.00019911313,0.88114816],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9815953,0.00004192673,0.0002434302,0.0035289456,0.0044053644,0.000021447993,0.00007793328,0.000016462453,0.010069205],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99841243,0.00007660983,0.0003876812,0.0003391142,0.00052669377,0.0002574911],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990177,0.00008373093,0.00017104753,0.00013766527,0.00023501203,0.00035485314],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003884277,0.00012548981,0.00015950817,0.000080837905,0.00045069095,0.00022319588,0.0007303352,0.00013470963,0.006604886],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018599829,0.00015312509,0.0001832695,0.00012982223,0.00015326694,0.0004108219,0.00006361396,0.00028150517,0.0009450428],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000047924983,0.00009140798,0.0028473013,0.000006512923,0.00009879503,0.00004167101,0.0031418595,0.000013563525,0.00037835952,0.98524255,0.0072955303,0.00079455605],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00040753922,0.000041824027,0.0024648583,0.00003794116,0.000017396973,0.0000067381184,0.00014711395,0.00036954216,0.00006967608,0.019276883,0.9769832,0.00017728077],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012590551,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019486427,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9696877,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00045257018,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015341099,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998328},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4205644112","doi":"10.1007/978-3-030-84647-3_19","title":"Chapter 7: Article 21—Adoption","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Children's well-being","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Political science; Sociology; Computer science; Engineering ethics; Engineering","score_opus":0.010203728247796386,"score_gpt":0.24043340866477048,"score_spread":0.2302296804169741,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4205644112","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009111551,0.00025563335,0.00004038247,0.0016383679,0.0009012334,0.00043190527,0.000010259966,0.00025945663,0.98735124],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.51752055,0.0017191847,0.000059839203,0.0006244215,0.002534087,0.000017534749,0.00010590313,0.00010072017,0.47731778],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979232,0.00004776668,0.00035483774,0.0005161155,0.00073826755,0.00041981234],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990999,0.000059206366,0.0002375376,0.00035180518,0.00006996372,0.00018160173],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00054416416,0.00029334947,0.00029955833,0.00018199968,0.0013316886,0.00015198054,0.00031493788,0.00029354918,0.016959105],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000020207015,0.00033742178,0.00026792355,0.00006226205,0.00021067658,0.00026112408,0.00016454913,0.00059240987,0.000653642],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012669182,0.000016994223,0.00055775756,0.00000550261,0.00005787935,0.000012459811,0.0038447727,0.000009619811,0.000015264133,0.97567624,0.00049276114,0.01929808],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002360008,0.000057384168,0.00205873,0.000067443594,0.00009849015,0.000006669047,0.0001223178,0.000012514387,0.000028430059,0.039063875,0.9577881,0.00046001782],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000805437,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00022902248,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95729536,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002335913,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008092611,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99996847},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4205703315","doi":"10.1163/ej.9789028609020.177-280.9","title":"Table des matières","year":2010,"lang":"fr","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Martinus Nijhoff Publishers eBooks","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Table (database); Round table; Political science; Law; Humanities; Cartography; History; Geography; Art; Advertising; Computer science; Business; Database","score_opus":0.033437242779895994,"score_gpt":0.25723836629653063,"score_spread":0.22380112351663464,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4205703315","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008181532,0.0003552924,0.00008444878,0.0022018447,0.005237898,0.0007578872,0.000048980262,0.00037072512,0.9827614],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.009237273,0.000001831153,0.0013579761,0.0006346798,0.0026792781,0.00006334318,0.000047989128,0.0001663404,0.9858113],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.995221,0.00019329802,0.0010115252,0.0009935142,0.0012139522,0.0013667111],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99669987,0.00029275886,0.0007325232,0.0008465569,0.00064982526,0.00077844976],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017848812,0.0008230664,0.0008200806,0.00031098048,0.002125518,0.0023843152,0.0010314268,0.0016882282,0.017344043],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00028325323,0.00087957096,0.00051375676,0.00013246837,0.004261834,0.0015337586,0.00033631918,0.001697876,0.0008872228],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009322937,0.00012028831,0.0010413678,0.00024903473,0.00038743176,0.000090075875,0.010986421,0.000004087686,0.0013693856,0.30418167,0.2686652,0.41281182],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039613797,0.00014192318,0.0002879299,0.00021665616,0.00019957476,0.000019220955,0.00014357215,0.000023118242,0.0003556088,0.031183189,0.9661364,0.0008966473],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007570143,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012237678,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6974712,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00029083225,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006045901,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998907},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4206235530","doi":"10.1093/cjcl/cxac001","title":"Applying the CISG to Hong Kong: Legal Analysis and Policy Recommendations","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Chinese Journal of Comparative Law","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"China; Negotiation; Business; International trade; Product (mathematics); Convention; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.03545764800285394,"score_gpt":0.3969114897672369,"score_spread":0.36145384176438294,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4206235530","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.78373486,0.0004901031,0.0040906826,0.14557144,0.0002938719,0.00027675423,0.0000067944093,0.000011293655,0.06552423],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969461,0.00012085344,0.00019183563,0.0012414099,0.0007058583,0.000008847917,0.0000011377145,0.0000029413543,0.00078100374],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99879926,0.00044022355,0.00026238215,0.000076668424,0.00028968687,0.0001317909],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988126,0.00044365204,0.00019357566,0.0001279309,0.00032091825,0.000101320824],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009791584,0.000081940336,0.00024923283,0.00009970852,0.0011025111,0.00026315023,0.00021940538,0.000021587857,0.00010885894],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008016634,0.00004108273,0.00014729626,0.0015238841,0.00018397486,0.00025186012,0.0000593018,0.00020219246,0.0000040810896],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008881492,0.00012353272,0.00826982,0.000003417322,0.0013235173,0.00001341547,0.10855247,0.0012558124,0.0012431792,0.8629195,0.0029650766,0.01324146],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003590197,0.0000668936,0.058375936,0.000027813034,0.00038042388,0.000035940488,0.014911932,0.00044703003,0.00024649934,0.016529014,0.9084662,0.00015325734],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011592442,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013934122,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9055012,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000047572074,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014355553,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8479736},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4206399425","doi":"10.4309/jgi.2001.4.4","title":"Note 1","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Gambling Issues","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Art","score_opus":0.13614966704838202,"score_gpt":0.4309496319170668,"score_spread":0.29479996486868476,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4206399425","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8760371,0.0026776611,0.0016167631,0.02874873,0.0017642365,0.000057567013,3.3588958e-7,0.00004196208,0.089055605],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9879803,0.003441299,0.0010647617,0.00013445487,0.0024385252,1.5751539e-7,9.367971e-8,0.000004806788,0.004935607],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991983,0.000052402567,0.00020861486,0.000042137795,0.0003683092,0.00013019751],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994195,0.00005251393,0.00017199773,0.00004838205,0.0002232056,0.000084375264],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009301322,0.000040032366,0.00011052096,0.00009517234,0.00018706165,0.000077048426,0.0001259278,0.000046305577,0.00030471236],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000193135,0.0000343009,0.00007829289,0.00016090646,0.000050044677,0.00025384667,0.000008140208,0.00011258335,0.000022573966],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004579331,0.00048495625,0.08075631,0.000023764638,0.00016338534,0.000649036,0.19506502,0.00029759444,0.008093124,0.037943665,0.037057895,0.63900733],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001410909,0.00006384579,0.0026992501,0.00003414678,0.000011438209,0.000016854176,0.0011647361,0.000016896967,0.0001411579,0.00092074764,0.99474615,0.00004371661],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004205778,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00022664547,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9576882,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004014778,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007144663,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33363867},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4206751831","doi":"10.1163/ej.9789028609020.177-280.2","title":"Introduction","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Martinus Nijhoff Publishers eBooks","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law","score_opus":0.014139357013766918,"score_gpt":0.2442795291708181,"score_spread":0.23014017215705118,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4206751831","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00011719772,0.000056035416,0.000023257437,0.008459906,0.0056895064,0.00047153025,0.000010827616,0.00043569342,0.984736],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00024997102,3.8983876e-7,0.00017105986,0.00037933013,0.013044443,0.000025463352,0.000055572094,0.000086133514,0.98598766],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99739605,0.0000642506,0.00047726205,0.00065135857,0.0008616371,0.0005494506],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99820554,0.00006650801,0.00039484035,0.0006190492,0.0003808761,0.0003331755],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001214094,0.0003634516,0.0003831652,0.00029523688,0.00082894845,0.0012130907,0.00048299154,0.0011237853,0.011622106],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000204692,0.00039731266,0.00028141402,0.000036264402,0.0006775036,0.00057472993,0.00011250346,0.0012479293,0.0005693759],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020084015,0.000009105755,0.000006150463,0.000010362884,0.000044670902,0.000009973247,0.0017068367,9.5989584e-8,0.00010730517,0.049219325,0.8765109,0.072355166],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016494984,0.000041193984,0.000020264459,0.000020100098,0.00006816219,0.000004605172,0.000054451077,7.3961246e-7,0.00005781408,0.01400856,0.98514235,0.00041678955],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00071931496,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002288111,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10863145,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00023602066,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00045955344,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998479},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4210513953","doi":"10.1139/bcb-2021-0592","title":"Note of appreciation","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biochemistry and Cell Biology","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Biology; Psychology; Chemistry","score_opus":0.010012831891315329,"score_gpt":0.26615267214147875,"score_spread":0.2561398402501634,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4210513953","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89892703,0.0003888035,0.000025748579,0.00032352871,0.000117762625,0.000031291394,0.000013084731,0.0000104176825,0.10016232],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99807227,0.0000955887,0.000025078523,0.0000344566,0.00008008043,0.0000050110257,0.00001595105,0.0000010073563,0.0016705528],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997186,0.000040410312,0.000059235437,0.0000764178,0.00004103071,0.00006429963],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998559,0.000025207175,0.000045864614,0.00004012052,0.00001262645,0.00002029647],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00017677386,0.000023277089,0.000042742307,0.000008388788,0.00019991283,0.0000024089677,0.000047673864,0.00004194426,0.00028647893],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000012104254,0.00002503778,0.000015850974,0.000048382688,0.000080983875,0.00000793129,0.00003308674,0.000041103598,5.736442e-7],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029250657,0.000062580315,0.0040954463,0.000017212447,0.0000047087938,3.723351e-7,0.0031779457,0.0000032038552,0.94595605,0.0049026525,0.0004297656,0.041320786],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013923425,0.00005023588,0.00032764557,7.991662e-7,0.000005384487,4.2288178e-7,0.0012837527,0.00001824139,0.13541229,0.00040671177,0.86230004,0.0000552326],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002052715,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000006828216,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8618703,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000015037285,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000037883583,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31367433},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4212913071","doi":"10.1163/1875-8096_pplrdc_a9789028616325_01","title":"Constitutional Aspects of Private International Law in Australia and in Canada (Volume 126)","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"dataset","venue":"Collected Courses of the Hague Academy of International Law","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Volume (thermodynamics); Law; Political science; Conflict of laws; Physics; Thermodynamics","score_opus":0.025724519941913083,"score_gpt":0.30976190826515226,"score_spread":0.28403738832323916,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4212913071","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06006596,0.000333772,0.0000016618634,0.007570577,0.0037751193,0.0009121312,0.8944082,0.000008316589,0.032924246],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9727715,0.00027653194,0.000022151426,0.00023114338,0.0001556468,0.000013496927,0.025311764,0.0000060253697,0.0012117045],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975303,0.00014360591,0.00073036435,0.00026848822,0.001115395,0.00021188063],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99858123,0.0002502676,0.0007457768,0.00013659713,0.00023112533,0.000054982425],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00038765473,0.00018188907,0.00041475592,0.00017936729,0.00008340841,0.000022837454,0.001147087,0.00028435045,0.0005350887],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00024522742,0.00017433117,0.000093072755,0.00032421708,0.0014566662,0.00018424292,0.00021298158,0.00050272536,0.0000025167312],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018374441,0.00013241256,0.007127673,0.000072001385,0.00024479543,0.000005116245,0.00013361954,0.0004569935,0.00012559618,0.7217087,0.26978117,0.000028128692],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00076346734,0.00001810211,0.024285147,0.0005672719,0.000041647287,0.0000042818183,0.00007347046,0.00005815609,0.00043769786,0.0025271499,0.9710476,0.00017604082],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.82164145,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9156247,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9127056,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007085844,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014694036,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7109019},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4214911020","doi":"10.18356/9789210010221c007","title":"No. 1375. Canada and Australia","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"United Nations Treaty Series","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"History; Geography","score_opus":0.029752333630378693,"score_gpt":0.2696244062832851,"score_spread":0.23987207265290642,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4214911020","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0007983776,0.000100601625,4.6608096e-7,0.0024642723,0.0004923743,0.00018769821,0.00045287242,0.000071618684,0.9954317],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0041450597,0.0016539939,0.000040658648,0.00009189972,0.00022489575,0.000014426663,0.00051842007,0.000017271022,0.99329334],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990822,0.00003566792,0.00016143877,0.00018512642,0.00038297984,0.00015258884],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999325,0.000106772546,0.000099383586,0.0001346363,0.00023410772,0.000100119425],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00010530073,0.00015117007,0.00014673096,0.000872374,0.0013088025,0.00007484909,0.000107836524,0.00013576553,0.0073785493],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000785235,0.00016893492,0.000040134906,0.00034839482,0.00020589311,0.0001729325,0.000038722676,0.00021653913,0.000016734035],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008523911,0.000005472847,0.00011471427,0.0000073940255,0.000045559693,0.000012388917,0.0010922347,0.000002735882,6.851964e-7,0.96906245,0.029184315,0.00046355088],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008492048,0.000033424112,0.00024782075,0.0000146105995,0.000052468145,0.000002546836,0.00035839097,7.5213165e-7,0.0000010902561,0.0012549673,0.9977769,0.00017207324],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.93099105,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9929801,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96859264,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002829597,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005746629,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99999136},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4214926895","doi":"10.1093/ulr/5.2.299-a","title":"The Evolution of Legal Systems, Bijuralism and International Trade / Evolution Des Systemes Juridiques Et Mondialisation - Ottawa (Canada), 20-21 October/octobre 2000. Conference organised by the Faculty of Law, University of Ottawa in collaboration with the Canadian Department of Justice and the Department of Heritage Canada / Colloque organise par la Faculte de droit de l'Universite d'Ottawa en collaboration avec le Ministere de la Justice du Canada et le Ministere du Patrimoine du Canada.","year":2000,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Uniform Law Review","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Economic Justice; Library science; Humanities; Law; Art","score_opus":0.0049458349740787964,"score_gpt":0.21857613864043451,"score_spread":0.21363030366635571,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4214926895","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8844133,0.018718533,0.00017104077,0.074793115,0.00027600597,0.0030184942,0.01048189,0.000009692236,0.008117899],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9925466,0.0066280453,0.00004561139,0.00024081342,0.000025663483,0.00001081459,0.00022132632,0.0000109184175,0.0002701611],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963929,0.0019739373,0.0006157895,0.0001955063,0.0005657669,0.00025609214],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976135,0.000679455,0.00082475453,0.00018441341,0.00055918354,0.00013873063],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018792814,0.00021023018,0.00043872336,0.000025440628,0.0007842201,0.00007278468,0.00032766085,0.00011071939,0.000011085885],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012797864,0.00015468476,0.00003310869,0.00046622846,0.0008946072,0.0003210887,0.00002871839,0.00014188072,1.5388485e-8],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024346192,0.000097649274,0.0043956945,0.0022803138,0.0002986763,0.000037212656,0.01479698,0.0015811232,0.00011882745,0.9557219,0.020141363,0.00028677945],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018766428,0.00012676611,0.013440625,0.0014039121,0.0011193388,0.00007890016,0.043896563,0.0016429136,0.00024423195,0.000064793094,0.9358308,0.00027455483],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9999155,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999986,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9556571,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0048682643,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.045867827,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99895185},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4214946147","doi":"10.3917/riges.373.0005","title":"Introduction","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gestion","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy","score_opus":0.02051162510308103,"score_gpt":0.2934924808710313,"score_spread":0.2729808557679503,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4214946147","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6224655,0.0004576191,0.0058062836,0.19806513,0.008040565,0.0002544231,0.0000010811149,0.00045977562,0.16444963],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98884,0.00005254343,0.00011942579,0.000045111785,0.0057259873,0.0000034811005,0.000003147679,0.0000020446134,0.005208261],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996385,0.000048530022,0.00004102932,0.00004343135,0.00010628873,0.00012222823],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998525,0.000011058921,0.000017497243,0.000043944787,0.000025321207,0.000049696904],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00044883194,0.000021088708,0.000022796126,0.000021897953,0.00020243422,0.000015552394,0.000020867294,0.000041406143,0.0005753087],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000822851,0.00002171918,0.000012931552,0.000080274534,0.000029235742,0.0002657114,0.0000038727585,0.000038881833,0.00025008354],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011552896,0.00007788426,0.024669733,0.0000030993076,0.000005339264,1.2538638e-7,0.017330687,0.000007457635,0.0015956286,0.59971136,0.04132707,0.31526008],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026141506,0.000005499059,0.065956555,0.0000011351602,0.0000035569753,4.7005614e-7,0.0002795417,0.0000034049986,0.00008568093,0.00022895403,0.93338144,0.000027632457],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00039446467,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006858046,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8920544,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000494348,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000010672319,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6299227},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4223498131","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2021-0085","title":"Frontiers of legality: Understanding the public policy exception in choice of law","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Principle of legality; Public law; Law; Political science; Municipal law; Private law; Comparative law; Doctrine; Philosophy of law; Common law; Choice of law; Conflict of laws","score_opus":0.0494973636357639,"score_gpt":0.286267658032464,"score_spread":0.2367702943967001,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4223498131","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.34024146,0.0012110213,0.004841051,0.015007397,0.0009491208,0.000279554,0.000039158,0.000019930038,0.6374113],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99934256,0.00017793114,0.00005147789,0.00003550457,0.00008078952,4.3178005e-8,7.990562e-7,0.0000021398657,0.00030872907],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99894994,0.00031229152,0.00013970793,0.000062980405,0.00039981594,0.00013527859],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994855,0.000045617486,0.00026439337,0.000079294216,0.00007178206,0.00005342592],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009461248,0.000039740116,0.00012352546,0.000047799116,0.00107971,0.00001686707,0.00029333122,0.000031791697,0.0005965982],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000021650974,0.000041649157,0.00008214482,0.00010065285,0.0004231035,0.0005362309,0.00007187706,0.00013490678,1.05680904e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000055482826,0.00007191518,0.0052342345,0.000005077323,0.00003794846,0.000002279982,0.031997442,0.00006363966,0.00013933281,0.9602567,0.0007928191,0.0013431218],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00097592536,0.00017975518,0.010299217,0.000016855047,0.00003985937,0.0000039898973,0.25658956,0.00006544586,0.000011875598,0.0075865723,0.72413063,0.0001003477],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5680793,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.60717434,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95267016,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013416586,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018586157,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.83043647},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4224116544","doi":"10.1017/9781009023122.021","title":"Hybridity in International Adjudication","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Centre for International Governance Innovation","funders":"","keywords":"Hybridity; Adjudication; Political science; Sociology; Law; Anthropology","score_opus":0.029823459231707913,"score_gpt":0.2445653156702511,"score_spread":0.2147418564385432,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4224116544","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00031572027,0.00004568464,0.000033043943,0.00026585214,0.0007433694,0.000263884,0.00013542552,0.000086602005,0.9981104],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.010424548,0.00062300294,0.000013973911,0.000055405435,0.00026706062,0.0000012917176,0.00009547236,0.000014562473,0.9885047],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998865,0.00007031477,0.00013874909,0.00030967555,0.0004485896,0.00016768971],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99939615,0.000051862356,0.00017275164,0.00020011415,0.00009049173,0.00008865592],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002768684,0.0001325068,0.00016274677,0.00022068135,0.00036525584,0.000036765407,0.00047366033,0.00016194314,0.00022630574],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001773192,0.00019379423,0.00011295554,0.000011453234,0.0001973524,0.00014163404,0.00023836574,0.00039235575,0.000010517901],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034909746,0.0000101803425,0.00001966841,0.000004816258,0.000026620053,0.00007106221,0.00047152082,0.0000019763927,0.000003667174,0.984142,0.010870834,0.004342722],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025729337,0.000012701575,0.00018918625,0.00002595883,0.000028847418,0.0000011688943,0.00015879696,0.000017657896,0.0000055590435,0.00003082743,0.9990881,0.0001838904],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0067377263,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00028453153,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9882173,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008130274,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021765019,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998765},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4224994360","doi":"10.1017/9781108891103","title":"Injunctions in Patent Law","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Enforcement; Flexibility (engineering); Patent law; Patent troll; Law and economics; Patent infringement; Political science; Law; Business; Intellectual property; Economics; Management","score_opus":0.04471699258732026,"score_gpt":0.23667623311097702,"score_spread":0.19195924052365676,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4224994360","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00012766635,0.00006978791,0.000021305324,0.00009046021,0.0007001996,0.0003892463,0.00013901763,0.00012915641,0.99833316],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0010875181,0.00016873065,0.000008044828,0.00011486855,0.00021783356,0.0000029260127,0.00006938173,0.000017875413,0.99831283],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99864614,0.00019980638,0.0001416421,0.00033113922,0.00039583162,0.0002854657],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993586,0.0000641742,0.00012265095,0.0002531439,0.00007070122,0.00013071856],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00026552577,0.00016128238,0.00022528523,0.00018563458,0.00088163867,0.000049985294,0.00038405138,0.00023974625,0.000081054895],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000008030292,0.00022233029,0.00015226098,0.00003350004,0.00033756194,0.000102965,0.0002627905,0.00055073044,0.000009558644],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028829108,0.000019162237,0.0000065755466,0.00001207968,0.000023678102,0.0001016596,0.00096941565,0.0000048497827,0.0000011516453,0.90256387,0.09565404,0.00061470363],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030412996,0.000031048483,0.000037679514,0.000032104883,0.00005523422,8.9737625e-7,0.00066068047,0.0000057786215,0.0000019272848,0.000020227926,0.9986255,0.0002247947],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023018979,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001904518,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90297145,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013403184,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005653017,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98348683},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4229542000","doi":"10.1093/iclq/50.3.632","title":"Pragmatism Rules","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International and Comparative Law Quarterly","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Law; Enforcement; Convention; Political science; Civil procedure; Pragmatism; Schedule; Law and economics; Business; Sociology; Economics; Management; Philosophy","score_opus":0.047062230425255897,"score_gpt":0.34246835315150387,"score_spread":0.295406122726248,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4229542000","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.498924,0.00007696262,0.00044258614,0.0042234627,0.00028519562,0.00006755864,0.000005954703,0.000041466814,0.49593285],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99433875,0.00005029058,0.000120543154,0.0002989393,0.00033073517,0.000011504234,0.00000811924,0.000001829863,0.004839285],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99939007,0.000055294982,0.00011350052,0.00011813493,0.00021682105,0.000106204774],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99970007,0.000056815814,0.000044938995,0.000042912143,0.00009508692,0.000060172453],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000117454925,0.000059784055,0.00008107351,0.00002703935,0.00027993554,0.00013971943,0.000106273015,0.000030046886,0.00046210946],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000020264417,0.000055583812,0.000027305196,0.000039122493,0.00018165984,0.00029957935,0.0000069339885,0.00005362767,0.00010173987],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016046723,0.00003287036,0.0007754628,4.7886846e-7,0.000020511128,0.000003797332,0.019155458,4.083316e-7,0.000058174355,0.9648222,0.00044827865,0.014666328],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020711798,0.00008589681,0.011646814,0.0000110420015,0.0000039724773,0.000006123835,0.0037088126,0.00014233531,0.000012607289,0.03838968,0.9457006,0.00008502493],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033792285,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0060571097,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9452523,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000023325445,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000015228963,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.51084054},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4229941087","doi":"10.1017/cbo9781107784772.002","title":"Declarations of personal interest","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institute of Cancer Research","funders":"","keywords":"Content (measure theory); Computer science; Personally identifiable information; Internet privacy; World Wide Web; Information retrieval; Computer security; Mathematics","score_opus":0.07858023651737239,"score_gpt":0.24946876557943012,"score_spread":0.17088852906205773,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4229941087","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00046865028,0.00006886238,0.00019347871,0.000033504122,0.00023380129,0.0001952191,0.00013381593,0.000057035744,0.9986156],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.03141151,0.00017262087,0.000023683746,0.000017572163,0.0001548802,2.404147e-7,0.000015458814,0.000013501615,0.96819055],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99926746,0.000038291364,0.00012976311,0.000212245,0.0002001464,0.00015210752],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992667,0.000040566676,0.00019115476,0.00017321596,0.00020630193,0.00012208815],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00011632411,0.00014095654,0.00020768007,0.0001251658,0.0003129865,0.0000194401,0.0002840866,0.000290097,0.00007567847],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000008947773,0.00017749524,0.00018602665,0.0000065162903,0.0005329839,0.0000828838,0.00010707992,0.00022297345,0.000011334983],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030353805,0.000008086231,0.0000047281615,0.000014616429,0.000060198076,0.000016989381,0.0019169983,2.4680649e-8,0.000015814332,0.98749363,0.00882019,0.001618385],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014849575,0.000034721896,0.0000398213,0.0000811897,0.00011791053,0.000001030186,0.0002482514,0.0000024436433,0.0000540811,0.000038395712,0.99906707,0.00016659166],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024087683,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003287514,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9902469,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011821682,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002288817,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7238046},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4230651989","doi":"10.3917/tu.023.0038","title":"Introduction","year":2018,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Tous urbains","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Musée de la Civilisation","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.019074275491195867,"score_gpt":0.2895488549977709,"score_spread":0.270474579506575,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4230651989","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12468565,0.0048228377,0.0010744389,0.20276493,0.024729399,0.0002393859,0.000012526294,0.00021410895,0.6414567],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.56107944,0.000408233,0.00012748144,0.00049872434,0.033653792,0.0000035056084,0.0000034791417,0.000012231695,0.4042131],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988622,0.00012300347,0.00016284753,0.00024751964,0.0002449511,0.00035950085],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994603,0.000025546115,0.00006988135,0.00019905518,0.00015025181,0.00009499004],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003688343,0.00010224712,0.000113152004,0.00004593547,0.0005829192,0.000065299995,0.00012473961,0.00014925412,0.011121762],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006332906,0.00011451256,0.000069124944,0.00039920522,0.00086254184,0.00023884999,0.000029995743,0.00012316064,0.004162934],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017157587,0.00012094529,0.00025378962,0.000009548537,0.000028194698,0.0000039433075,0.023690714,0.0000017683857,0.00028235014,0.29297408,0.3864646,0.2961529],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011793743,0.0002076477,0.0019807327,0.000011570211,0.000033088545,0.0000052279465,0.0005662177,0.0001102138,0.00015415609,0.001818482,0.9948618,0.00013295074],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0033939262,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018640279,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6083972,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001759939,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009879191,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9966124},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4231095648","doi":"10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195329278.003.0004","title":"Canada","year":2007,"lang":"it","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Doctrine; Jurisdiction; Law; Political science; Common law","score_opus":0.03738016599703249,"score_gpt":0.23467394150259557,"score_spread":0.1972937755055631,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4231095648","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00017244642,0.000034251443,0.00009785287,0.0001765508,0.001026412,0.00038686776,0.00020391805,0.00007539308,0.9978263],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0063064983,0.00085767993,0.000054788507,0.00023937669,0.00049928605,1.808567e-7,0.000020748033,0.000032610562,0.99198884],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976804,0.000058117992,0.00025937398,0.0005309868,0.0008732012,0.0005978754],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984723,0.00012131173,0.00033362038,0.00039563244,0.00023969964,0.00043743732],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002853118,0.00039263148,0.00041175878,0.00013839033,0.0011324491,0.00007433703,0.00065769925,0.00059617596,0.00054028374],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000008485824,0.0005031512,0.00023241574,0.000019716375,0.0004573592,0.00011631434,0.0002715635,0.00058068516,0.0000021491308],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009567493,0.000008824673,0.000017822427,0.000028239154,0.0001409961,0.0003201649,0.0009516999,0.0000025872682,0.0000026301182,0.9756851,0.0035014001,0.019244848],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037159928,0.00004992362,0.00006883391,0.000101026955,0.00021118806,0.000002689988,0.00056289375,0.000018787852,0.000014593885,0.000093499526,0.99797666,0.0005282966],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9106773,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.84109914,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99447525,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00097143045,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016233806,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99974203},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4231814723","doi":"10.1093/nq/510184","title":"Review: The Beginnings of English Law","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Notes and Queries","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"English law; Law; History; Classics; Media studies; Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.016568394844404543,"score_gpt":0.2911095621237957,"score_spread":0.27454116727939115,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4231814723","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.34898567,0.16780181,0.00016351575,0.12659067,0.001315662,0.00075738557,0.000017318911,0.00020139468,0.3541666],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9667568,0.030594526,0.00006742959,0.0022303564,0.0002443364,0.0000044054286,8.090562e-7,0.000002470438,0.00009887485],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997026,0.000019052828,0.00007189128,0.000050905506,0.000085072155,0.000070527225],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997286,0.000058128306,0.000037022244,0.000056654804,0.00009917602,0.00002036971],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00023816284,0.00003125439,0.000069000664,0.0000049635546,0.00027107293,0.000019998155,0.000044820852,0.000022556727,0.000029098848],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023894511,0.000020727424,0.000024378647,0.000059602786,0.00047308428,0.00008964949,0.000013743488,0.000036020276,8.73671e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000033768588,0.000008965974,0.0005018351,0.0000639778,0.0000056211593,2.221649e-7,0.044047147,7.6716145e-7,0.000027599099,0.94534206,0.00088006555,0.00911833],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000048587524,0.000020299929,0.0005021548,0.00014726057,0.000008740982,1.14225166e-7,0.0009287133,8.214421e-8,0.00016970669,0.0027023633,0.9954425,0.000029490646],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008317479,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027609596,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99456245,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000005855503,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000022901333,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99828625},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4232415409","doi":"10.1007/978-3-642-27833-4_219-4","title":"Campbellrand-Malmani Platform, South Africa","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Encyclopedia of Astrobiology","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Geography","score_opus":0.018744502176744705,"score_gpt":0.24550062041612977,"score_spread":0.22675611823938507,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4232415409","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0006809577,0.0003830666,0.00038981336,0.00017325323,0.0012484187,0.00031107312,0.00007691694,0.000077925986,0.99665856],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.046815217,0.0013571444,0.00034492326,0.00005318704,0.0020061918,0.000011599855,0.000091702335,0.000047213613,0.9492728],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99836195,0.000058131485,0.00050215534,0.00039196425,0.00023915104,0.00044664924],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987022,0.00018944539,0.00051559176,0.00030781128,0.00013897783,0.00014592223],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00050176325,0.00029326166,0.0006106054,0.0001770041,0.0002376521,0.000012926964,0.00038582445,0.00074412127,0.0028267854],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006792081,0.00028107184,0.00025076687,0.000036419027,0.0006143593,0.000050454742,0.000093056,0.00038470948,0.00031780393],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010090952,0.000026748332,0.00050186756,0.00004517149,0.00018203391,0.00000866048,0.022456134,0.0000060055763,0.00003055475,0.9306602,0.014163378,0.031818338],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025418415,0.00021260917,0.00009342893,0.000046088982,0.00007072923,0.0000012430669,0.00021430435,7.3650455e-7,0.0000025160232,0.0036665285,0.995185,0.00025260897],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00018055785,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00052848354,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98102164,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006327578,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00025272838,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999641},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4232813910","doi":"10.1139/juvs-2018-0034","title":"Note of appreciation","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Unmanned Vehicle Systems","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.02031185928765546,"score_gpt":0.3228300597744643,"score_spread":0.30251820048680883,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4232813910","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95727825,0.00037654,0.0019815732,0.0011891285,0.003093598,0.00015978183,0.0000028807317,0.000017980365,0.035900254],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966853,0.000055026343,0.00007319295,0.00001935776,0.0024791947,6.091625e-7,2.1325306e-7,0.0000054178877,0.00068167516],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998657,0.00017783747,0.0004709654,0.000058948415,0.0004967391,0.00013851433],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99834335,0.00007777206,0.0006967777,0.00008429045,0.0007145454,0.000083239895],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016127882,0.000050532894,0.00018814651,0.00011399376,0.00017337072,0.000041774572,0.0001603304,0.00008473114,0.00003853508],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014193526,0.000043913107,0.00008933054,0.000220213,0.00011614929,0.00026903025,0.000010799892,0.00008579535,0.000016293641],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0018308901,0.0012921223,0.09087945,0.0004731609,0.00075536035,0.00005598189,0.2959088,0.0008193656,0.15670587,0.17636162,0.04352783,0.23138954],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014490391,0.0012922162,0.022311065,0.0004531667,0.000083584215,0.00002313372,0.008657695,0.0020380018,0.0046741683,0.0008500199,0.9579422,0.00022569785],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00073726487,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00019986887,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9144144,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000083645595,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013587248,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17907245},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4233505623","doi":"10.1007/978-1-4939-7131-2_100593","title":"Legal Issues and Implications","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law and economics; Engineering ethics; Sociology; Engineering","score_opus":0.03258932250512865,"score_gpt":0.33012266195395384,"score_spread":0.2975333394488252,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4233505623","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000059908238,0.00038058625,0.000030316723,0.007150021,0.00013926838,0.0001090612,0.000008050209,0.00008059701,0.9920422],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0021750513,0.0016750185,0.0001163666,0.00020006925,0.0010758886,0.0000027584656,0.0000061248156,0.0000093091885,0.9947394],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99953955,0.000005864529,0.00008973022,0.0001515252,0.0001200894,0.000093217415],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99968165,0.000020843252,0.00004345676,0.00011659401,0.000083862404,0.00005360034],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00012406023,0.00007423625,0.000091359565,0.00003766795,0.0003420281,0.000094403855,0.0000749351,0.00016267122,0.007825194],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000008098578,0.00007011768,0.000034937715,0.000009929817,0.00028708964,0.00007976148,0.00002835852,0.00006489916,0.00024842724],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[6.095181e-7,0.0000014119311,0.000010647653,0.0000011877095,0.000007288147,1.954563e-7,0.000805918,1.1065652e-9,0.0000019971162,0.9542178,0.0353768,0.009576132],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002193966,0.00001587329,0.00014635263,0.000008908112,0.000013608855,6.131741e-7,0.0000621296,2.398645e-7,0.0000012905974,0.06801279,0.9316326,0.00008366506],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024866078,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0055109607,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8962558,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002308704,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000059449416,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9930818},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4233550381","doi":"10.1017/s0008413100000827","title":"Note from the Editor","year":2004,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Journal of Linguistics / La revue canadienne de linguistique","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Applied linguistics; Linguistics; Cognitive linguistics; Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy; Psychology; Cognition","score_opus":0.013406934769436682,"score_gpt":0.2636589230990023,"score_spread":0.25025198832956563,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4233550381","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19500318,0.047069702,0.0023782677,0.3351718,0.31487277,0.0010587927,0.0015865839,0.000060116283,0.10279879],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8376533,0.0005532363,0.0011714417,0.001650222,0.15653081,0.0000033340448,0.000007476099,0.00005304471,0.0023771739],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.996669,0.00064720167,0.00085864577,0.0002561735,0.0002664634,0.0013025464],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99233764,0.001736569,0.000820757,0.0005345494,0.0023883793,0.0021821086],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0043331785,0.00032832523,0.0004486164,0.0001425395,0.0019166172,0.00046012044,0.0014478662,0.00052500836,0.00019098779],"category_scores_gemma":[0.034134798,0.00026293166,0.00033429323,0.0005337911,0.0016709197,0.000043622324,0.000033411274,0.0018405204,0.000029643777],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000341027,0.000035229346,0.0012904707,0.000040217536,0.00020562838,0.0024772796,0.14476012,0.002764365,0.000010637339,0.82479256,0.020492608,0.0030967938],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000375943,0.000113363734,0.0019470183,0.0007270158,0.00031959827,0.00016487883,0.0018100829,0.00008974891,0.000017584836,0.07755233,0.916603,0.00027943176],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8983243,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99349016,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8961104,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036176722,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015099495,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999823},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4233859335","doi":"10.7202/1044861ar","title":"SÛRETÉS","year":2010,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue du notariat","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.013860775817756528,"score_gpt":0.2664874436191961,"score_spread":0.25262666780143955,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4233859335","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5690294,0.0018042413,0.00025331284,0.15948573,0.039432842,0.00028067292,0.000027169202,0.00012517416,0.22956148],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90800893,0.0011729554,0.000537953,0.0004515559,0.011490359,0.000008336052,0.000007095011,0.000021145543,0.078301646],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99882126,0.0000919671,0.00022779425,0.00026692383,0.00020736836,0.00038467822],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99919224,0.00012973414,0.000103398204,0.00027371233,0.00009893948,0.00020196717],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00061219087,0.00013829743,0.00018804205,0.00004086593,0.00045661413,0.000108116474,0.00023235711,0.00034154358,0.0063738083],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017620245,0.00015859868,0.00015141789,0.00029633185,0.0003232694,0.0002859549,0.00005362269,0.0004635429,0.0015280362],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001112676,0.00014410174,0.006264853,0.000043350115,0.000033108132,0.000026280897,0.014784913,0.0000069359585,0.001314788,0.82122123,0.0088600945,0.14728922],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018892008,0.000037514103,0.009400104,0.000035451263,0.00005281793,0.000015937807,0.00021097304,0.00053984247,0.000046017147,0.0024538843,0.9868265,0.00019205087],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007103733,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009549379,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97796637,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000066683744,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012465638,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999508},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4234058516","doi":"10.1089/blr.2010.9960","title":"In the High Court of Justice Before The Hon. Mr. Justice Arnold: <i>Intervet UK Ltd. v. Merial, the Queen's University of Belfast, and the University of Saskatchewan</i> (Case no. HC09C00779)","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biotechnology Law Report","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Queen (butterfly); Economic Justice; Law; Sociology; Biology; Political science; Botany","score_opus":0.006586631673614615,"score_gpt":0.23238556536232835,"score_spread":0.22579893368871373,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4234058516","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9238715,0.0000548889,0.00013387139,0.06915093,0.00065491354,0.00052563817,0.000042813175,0.000037506074,0.0055278917],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984357,0.00020258759,0.00013486916,0.00014461137,0.00009709813,6.353436e-7,0.0000022334978,0.0000052551018,0.0009770157],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99869895,0.00029501956,0.00028473113,0.00022936809,0.00028428616,0.00020766756],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981003,0.00035305685,0.00057904853,0.0007074829,0.00023117391,0.00002894188],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024772573,0.000119070886,0.00027789743,0.000045067856,0.0008897327,0.000012922559,0.000761377,0.0003941946,0.00006767972],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00025510986,0.00006808392,0.00011202242,0.00035235408,0.006376892,0.000094569354,0.0002417911,0.0005464539,0.0000020531802],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007074979,0.00035815127,0.001757058,0.00015643715,0.00031119713,0.0017030112,0.07706686,0.000010257067,0.0066370196,0.9003228,0.008818849,0.0021508595],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016178691,0.00022170515,0.0028156592,0.000046459332,0.0012915243,0.0006355952,0.24265055,0.000040664952,0.0024752442,0.0030371465,0.7449728,0.00019476011],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13570009,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1363426,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89728564,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000025490943,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016784319,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99632716},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4234302142","doi":"10.1093/ww/9780199540884.013.7773","title":"Blais, Hon. Jean Jacques, (born 27 June 1940), PC (Can.) 1976; QC (Can.) 1978; Counsel, MBM Intellectual Property Law LLP (formerly Marusyk, Miller &amp; Swain), Ottawa, since 1999","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"reference-entry","venue":"Who's Who","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Miller; Law; Intellectual property; Property (philosophy); Genealogy; Management; History; Political science; Philosophy; Economics; Biology","score_opus":0.030317161747875698,"score_gpt":0.2830266855075744,"score_spread":0.25270952375969874,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4234302142","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0011867033,0.019209217,0.00030674806,0.008951725,0.009871237,0.0027008003,0.001485348,0.000858313,0.9554299],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.009252972,0.1462427,0.00032337953,0.0031006872,0.007338207,0.00014371019,0.002037238,0.00028624243,0.83127487],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9890619,0.0008281442,0.0019038863,0.0021413732,0.0033043216,0.0027603547],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9941576,0.0009747387,0.0010926686,0.0015443178,0.0010498854,0.0011807566],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaepi_narrow","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027061785,0.0016415288,0.002116891,0.00071052485,0.00276579,0.0011222614,0.0020928609,0.0024669499,0.005472955],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00075994816,0.0013444881,0.0008542444,0.0016119359,0.00246896,0.00061700825,0.00035526007,0.0027331514,0.0011980823],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021856406,0.0003416068,0.00015152489,0.0003495851,0.0003698126,0.00006707222,0.01767128,0.000004261285,0.000008207955,0.009491232,0.8734416,0.09788528],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009783526,0.00038233874,0.00010216065,0.0015651775,0.00030305082,0.000019828385,0.0011709774,0.000026179388,0.000031803775,0.00041466753,0.99308985,0.0019155879],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1441194,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.53682196,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.39270255,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015157827,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025512553,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99991465},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4234308217","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3006704","title":"Exceptional Procedures to Correct Miscarriages of Justice in Common Law Systems","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Economic Justice; Common law; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.01916179656834591,"score_gpt":0.3359113619956188,"score_spread":0.31674956542727284,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4234308217","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9506176,0.0012436067,0.00035116766,0.0032566972,0.0013166203,0.0002799465,0.0000042083298,0.00001985778,0.04291028],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99615407,0.0011102905,0.000009980352,0.000043760774,0.0007705561,0.0000065642444,6.925904e-7,0.000007339876,0.0018967649],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99823177,0.00012531453,0.00025070534,0.00011598958,0.00037224454,0.0009039652],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993533,0.00006241271,0.00024173649,0.00013819619,0.00011489127,0.0000894543],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023085135,0.0000771503,0.00017501535,0.00007504591,0.0009900975,0.00017188466,0.00039920374,0.00007162948,0.000024326737],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017551084,0.00007277174,0.000058624086,0.000067340436,0.00013319144,0.00024551305,0.00002953694,0.00052991096,0.000009230537],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009489202,0.00007524758,0.00995267,0.000026622569,0.000038030554,0.0000032122687,0.0042926245,0.00016989929,0.00051416655,0.97827303,0.00033663423,0.0062229545],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0050144796,0.0024854613,0.18247283,0.0016193474,0.0004512499,0.0004934424,0.13392623,0.00041473928,0.00043238432,0.4403732,0.23074786,0.001568775],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011064352,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.17633505,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.53789985,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00047692543,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014460632,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99552107},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4234546058","doi":"10.1163/1875-8096_pplrdc_ej.9789028609020.177_280.4","title":"II. Mariage","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"dataset","venue":"Collected Courses of the Hague Academy of International Law","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Limit (mathematics); Law; Political science; Humanities; Mathematics; Art; Mathematical analysis","score_opus":0.027105653637920276,"score_gpt":0.35296224775227364,"score_spread":0.32585659411435336,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4234546058","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"dataset","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"dataset","genre_consensus":"dataset","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00044761738,0.00036947825,8.828421e-7,0.013094081,0.0029952938,0.00040232373,0.90988344,0.000022205084,0.07278467],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.12724623,0.007172427,0.00015369666,0.0028285421,0.005855098,0.00012701156,0.67185247,0.00008531748,0.1846792],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979093,0.00014481947,0.00044010094,0.00023475436,0.0010648079,0.00020621526],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997936,0.00019723491,0.0011697855,0.000327125,0.00030543664,0.00006439136],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00050223636,0.00017723758,0.00034640773,0.00012789824,0.0010478835,0.00006179334,0.002830351,0.0005050959,0.0009642775],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00067600026,0.00014861776,0.0002806028,0.00015073015,0.0011690194,0.000171683,0.00046699177,0.0004993649,0.000015402777],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004519923,0.00007917786,0.00002535028,0.00001817002,0.00019429291,6.4948034e-7,0.00014671078,0.0000034793882,0.000039938794,0.042536624,0.9567744,0.00013597471],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027011737,0.000026726453,0.00084207737,0.00022244886,0.00012020704,0.0000014134786,0.000035673576,0.0000044467292,0.0003341331,0.0017700464,0.99623513,0.0001375477],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0087976735,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0042788414,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23803097,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012840753,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00038198248,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999949},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4235012708","doi":"10.1093/ww/9780199540884.013.u174408","title":"Morton, His Honour (Stephen) Alastair, (28 July 1913–9 May 1992), JP; a Circuit Judge (formerly Deputy Chairman, Greater London Quarter Sessions), 1971–87","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"reference-entry","venue":"Who Was Who","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Honour; Quarter (Canadian coin); Art; Art history; Management; Law; History; Political science; Archaeology; Economics","score_opus":0.03611893765986885,"score_gpt":0.3028656891188444,"score_spread":0.26674675145897553,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4235012708","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02727732,0.00563878,0.00092161726,0.0038441087,0.0076873074,0.0023672327,0.00078996253,0.0008546205,0.95061904],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1513649,0.044940926,0.0001373526,0.0021584588,0.010947696,0.00030166493,0.0011465155,0.00036372003,0.7886388],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9920519,0.0004689549,0.0014153551,0.001599127,0.002271677,0.0021929764],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962286,0.00023421824,0.00092843495,0.0011606795,0.00047603075,0.000972064],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012042269,0.0011834083,0.0015572543,0.00081901596,0.0017447605,0.00066302397,0.0011839693,0.0020207749,0.002255187],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000094797615,0.0010802138,0.0008380838,0.00092734426,0.00058656454,0.00088764424,0.00024278137,0.0018009194,0.0012129964],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011314525,0.00025460855,0.007520336,0.00040745953,0.00033439233,0.0002011548,0.018451238,0.0000023300158,0.0000045071597,0.0017768155,0.79858106,0.17235297],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009938768,0.00029950944,0.0118463,0.001288788,0.00029845108,0.000024903717,0.0014077659,0.000016174043,0.000023701501,0.0002955367,0.98219854,0.0013064656],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012684165,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013354701,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18361749,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010336313,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013828713,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99956465},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4235059816","doi":"10.22215/etd/2005-10683","title":"A proceduralist theory of supranational law","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University; Canadian Heritage; Library and Archives Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.01866527316592898,"score_gpt":0.33081810352090507,"score_spread":0.3121528303549761,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4235059816","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016208045,0.00014829713,0.0000072095736,0.000608226,0.00032175466,0.00016698135,0.0000105311365,0.000044641398,0.98248434],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.798363,0.00009648267,0.00008557456,0.000151317,0.00043218248,0.000013843386,0.00029396598,0.000009252075,0.20055439],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99911475,0.000056431552,0.0001907875,0.00012064962,0.0004070687,0.000110283465],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994476,0.00007054961,0.00013347571,0.00006513264,0.00024255458,0.000040675593],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00039043842,0.0000773618,0.00012444794,0.00005761593,0.00021888576,0.000029409333,0.00012435442,0.00017807445,0.004530936],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000054749293,0.00007330482,0.00008379198,0.00010576053,0.000100026606,0.000121444056,0.0000033308484,0.000083182276,0.000021495094],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030034693,0.000029614865,0.000019771072,0.00002259858,0.00001581325,1.4234298e-7,0.008523258,3.404061e-7,0.000041189596,0.98498964,0.0009017586,0.005425859],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020032976,0.00002686315,0.0047716,0.000072392235,0.00005798184,2.637814e-7,0.022654312,0.0000031535967,0.00063098007,0.02430508,0.94705576,0.00022130983],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030825727,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10970847,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96068454,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004361923,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002939838,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9963791},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4235252376","doi":"10.1007/978-1-4614-6170-8_100091","title":"Guilt by Association","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Association (psychology); Psychology; Psychotherapist","score_opus":0.013973283285943891,"score_gpt":0.26378577728869573,"score_spread":0.24981249400275185,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4235252376","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000048925394,0.00010082063,0.00013674579,0.008765066,0.00055430114,0.00010940787,0.000010986964,0.00012371906,0.9901941],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00064349396,0.00047625042,0.00004638494,0.0005910636,0.0009688404,0.0000021466412,0.00003086344,0.000015380032,0.9972256],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990168,0.000023513678,0.00015108036,0.0001607659,0.00048828364,0.00015953908],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992525,0.00009317359,0.00018585246,0.00027996497,0.00011448274,0.00007403966],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005658563,0.00010115109,0.00015137492,0.000034964283,0.0002461817,0.00007537459,0.00031171838,0.00046519766,0.007880002],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000202426,0.00010297804,0.00009649418,0.000011571815,0.000037999587,0.000040950315,0.000058170324,0.000144207,0.0009097428],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[5.3455165e-7,0.0000013181708,0.00002133772,0.0000010555153,0.000012433044,1.09368294e-7,0.00021234615,1.5810258e-8,0.0000026232294,0.4661514,0.5272399,0.006356904],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000051900635,0.000016628455,0.000008763053,0.000010516947,0.000021812008,3.442692e-8,0.00001462203,0.0000013371275,0.0000025078846,0.025848262,0.9738954,0.00012824257],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013579257,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020753837,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.44665542,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00031505254,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006528879,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99986815},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4235312523","doi":"10.1002/9781444338386.wbeah13161","title":"<i>Legis actio</i>","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"The Encyclopedia of Ancient History","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Lawsuit; Statute; Action (physics); Law; Philosophy; Classics; Political science; Art; Physics","score_opus":0.019928879065593624,"score_gpt":0.2580812322776695,"score_spread":0.23815235321207587,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4235312523","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00004606601,0.020368602,0.000016067133,0.00037966366,0.00734282,0.00025811882,0.000012461964,0.0001401023,0.9714361],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00040712394,0.007852689,0.000046509685,0.00034300954,0.002949302,0.000015388514,0.0000056759,0.000109912246,0.9882704],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986756,0.00012904899,0.0001832883,0.00017211665,0.000523194,0.00031677927],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99905086,0.000059868402,0.00035251668,0.00038186615,0.00003981674,0.00011509044],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000601467,0.0001501711,0.00022061054,0.00012835502,0.00015067452,0.0000044500575,0.00039826112,0.00021980135,0.013082997],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000044701996,0.000119659984,0.00013453793,0.00011354844,0.00062537275,0.0000638394,0.000042473417,0.00019636811,0.00033967194],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000036884874,0.000043007727,0.000046908885,0.000016523365,0.000015444652,4.6824283e-7,0.009140691,7.924589e-8,0.0000108660115,0.0051934686,0.9789392,0.0065896916],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000067780165,0.000013171726,0.00017143333,0.00003536602,0.000056542012,3.0143232e-7,0.0003002383,1.5825582e-7,0.0000011106387,0.000014992295,0.99919856,0.00014035047],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005428176,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023458765,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020259393,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00040415724,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004123139,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9878192},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4235739477","doi":"10.36019/9780813584256","title":"Sovereign Acts","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Rutgers University Press eBooks","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sovereignty; Political science; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.02851219976296745,"score_gpt":0.2393656655902465,"score_spread":0.21085346582727904,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4235739477","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000005857118,0.000049613354,0.000031169828,0.00006326651,0.0006800552,0.00042265796,0.000051596,0.00018046668,0.9985153],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0016408042,0.00023614246,0.000025679457,0.00007965278,0.00042139651,2.9214692e-7,0.000025310648,0.00002431745,0.9975464],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99853426,0.000121028075,0.00011259096,0.0003667047,0.000510047,0.00035535684],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990469,0.00011432431,0.00019493679,0.00033619456,0.00011686551,0.00019074332],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00021515205,0.00021025764,0.00028875034,0.00019927268,0.0004954266,0.00008855886,0.0005245692,0.00057370815,0.00020715885],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000012431896,0.00026826654,0.00021931334,0.000022394468,0.0003023567,0.00014700896,0.00014750606,0.00037496738,0.00008893627],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005689184,0.00001167411,0.0000018190179,0.000042523774,0.00010724621,0.000053527998,0.004149997,0.000002599731,0.000030540425,0.8903965,0.10204288,0.0031038478],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030768843,0.000027247863,0.0000013341855,0.00008723255,0.0001081117,4.5555674e-7,0.000095705574,0.0000035384182,0.00007827839,0.0006366083,0.9983567,0.00029710346],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010408548,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002300959,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8963138,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006116984,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010591106,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99997693},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4236370887","doi":"10.3917/lpm.021.0122","title":"Le carnet d'Hubert Nyssen","year":2007,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"La pensée de midi","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Espace pour la vie","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.012620814750565451,"score_gpt":0.29607097957746725,"score_spread":0.2834501648269018,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4236370887","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.28064802,0.0038238526,0.0004575463,0.024217764,0.0015598884,0.00014282796,0.000008556843,0.00008498095,0.6890566],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9074938,0.0008082729,0.00030621316,0.0007765085,0.001368204,0.0000028925786,0.0000059775875,0.000019373421,0.08921871],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99837476,0.00020428842,0.00023674493,0.00024731093,0.00030511167,0.000631785],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991449,0.0002532822,0.00008303998,0.00018772454,0.00007480135,0.0002562631],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016891735,0.00013815945,0.00017547084,0.000047128226,0.0004098537,0.00010037376,0.00020306004,0.00030565323,0.00064264936],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007067761,0.00016428986,0.00012885417,0.00031584935,0.00055319397,0.00017838365,0.000049458456,0.00024779636,0.00033811844],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027767011,0.0001555595,0.004884998,0.000025990228,0.000039585066,0.0001443599,0.021830631,0.000009704921,0.00072443584,0.86600286,0.018047264,0.08810684],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023469629,0.000041974294,0.021701083,0.000035412948,0.00003463603,0.000026128022,0.0018077024,0.00004352942,0.0005334074,0.0028014926,0.9725463,0.00019367189],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03944872,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.026447617,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.954499,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013490244,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003278222,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99131715},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4236832899","doi":"10.17345/rcda1082","title":"CLARKSON, Stephen, WOOD, Stephen, A Perilous Imbalance. The Globalization and Canadian Law and Governance, UBC Press, Toronto/Vancouver, 2010","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revista Catalana de Dret Ambiental","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Globalization; Corporate governance; Law; Economic history; Political science; History; Economics; Management","score_opus":0.006107625366688574,"score_gpt":0.2404427049458389,"score_spread":0.2343350795791503,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4236832899","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8596754,0.009699657,0.000030610365,0.0014623844,0.0022385747,0.0012220639,0.0006779125,0.00012989895,0.12486346],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9950291,0.0020813951,0.000044180575,0.0006853877,0.00041841008,0.000019959989,0.00005484998,0.0000186062,0.0016481446],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99852455,0.000094555035,0.00021818186,0.0003374869,0.0003453752,0.00047986204],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999049,0.000039174145,0.00013771569,0.0002939517,0.00008444138,0.00039571925],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005123336,0.00017636213,0.00019663517,0.000012646759,0.0009160279,0.00048594523,0.00025179487,0.00017501578,0.00017524126],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000067950925,0.00015538736,0.000051724805,0.00010574036,0.00053372746,0.000459846,0.000067914036,0.0002241659,0.000004485219],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010501222,0.00010981075,0.08469651,0.000121458936,0.000104802835,0.000049539063,0.022352077,0.0000010860018,0.001059392,0.74632144,0.12743866,0.017640216],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033020027,0.00003305812,0.039430402,0.000027855207,0.000040610314,0.000017956321,0.0014853334,0.00007674724,0.000015740601,0.000088804896,0.9582465,0.00020675558],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7826069,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9788185,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83080786,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00034912815,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024872698,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7045438},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4237010115","doi":"10.1002/crq.3890180401","title":"Masthead","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"Mediation Quarterly","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University; Royal Roads University; Toronto Public Health","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.018050015377427217,"score_gpt":0.3128819204824273,"score_spread":0.29483190510500007,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4237010115","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0015131165,0.00067205215,0.001116517,0.0046599624,0.009512155,0.00034509972,0.000046422298,0.00010157881,0.9820331],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.03861789,0.0015963542,0.00005521252,0.00039584693,0.010859806,0.00007582236,0.00041498133,0.000037576305,0.9479465],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99835014,0.00019753078,0.0002749345,0.00025467528,0.0006056562,0.00031706027],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992085,0.00010054931,0.00021729757,0.00019160047,0.00013594942,0.00014608928],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00044129536,0.00015590018,0.00021921723,0.00015977288,0.00036688914,0.00015249358,0.00020785898,0.00040621049,0.02543902],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000034612633,0.00016504212,0.000105043786,0.0002484344,0.00009602356,0.00018190226,0.000004367222,0.00023867756,0.023211012],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009181406,0.000043681495,0.000047200985,0.000016360778,0.000021415914,0.0000037022878,0.045673244,0.000001796356,0.000012759747,0.002157634,0.7725591,0.17945391],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000119513476,0.00010639705,0.00020076678,0.000027000648,0.000013036076,4.952355e-7,0.0020764992,0.000007685439,0.0000012686767,0.00018184059,0.9970841,0.00018142397],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022053737,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002418971,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22452496,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018661853,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00032499523,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97754955},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4237915007","doi":"10.1163/9789087901714_014","title":"Other Titles Of Interest","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"History","score_opus":0.1579199206582472,"score_gpt":0.3550053481163315,"score_spread":0.1970854274580843,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4237915007","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000035777797,0.00011508449,0.00010886848,0.00018009292,0.00021532975,0.00006272986,0.000005544118,0.000030018906,0.99924654],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0065734037,0.00012563847,0.000061428196,0.0001120993,0.00035195574,2.4902744e-7,0.0000014864565,0.000011220141,0.9927625],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99959284,0.0000042589486,0.0001238829,0.000079921665,0.00012413852,0.00007497212],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99971867,0.000030228888,0.00007652757,0.000084947074,0.000054252712,0.000035387173],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00019921696,0.000060673345,0.000105134764,0.00006280347,0.000042317286,0.000009860364,0.00008761806,0.0001804162,0.021011295],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000006811576,0.0000537088,0.000071636176,0.0000096999265,0.00015308501,0.000022070508,0.000015972088,0.00007269065,0.00024447264],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000023305038,0.0000031754444,0.000011025387,0.0000035683881,0.000011386987,6.494718e-7,0.0005449793,7.650105e-9,0.000004960431,0.97414047,0.004253723,0.02102372],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025939044,0.000012740665,0.000014299896,0.000039344843,0.000008565653,9.25805e-8,0.00007301788,1.7811898e-7,0.000015591477,0.014082267,0.9856675,0.00006041688],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023849632,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.026156386,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98141384,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000024746683,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004219025,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99161375},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4237965811","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198795674.003.0009","title":"Scope of (Remedial) Jurisdiction","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Scope (computer science); Remedial education; Law; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.03239930293863498,"score_gpt":0.2640027156571886,"score_spread":0.23160341271855361,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4237965811","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00010725051,0.00010827979,0.0000909956,0.00003708559,0.00081873394,0.00036408988,0.000044304135,0.00009496749,0.9983343],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.001068748,0.0026853727,0.000041462437,0.000009946346,0.0005733667,5.7704085e-7,0.000026543761,0.000018382918,0.9955756],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987112,0.00009303792,0.00016653637,0.00028429824,0.0004960009,0.00024888327],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99860346,0.000058557518,0.000515207,0.00045010247,0.00022611914,0.0001465443],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00030885582,0.00017905392,0.0003306016,0.00015236372,0.00086260034,0.000056081597,0.0006768851,0.0005130115,0.00006199645],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000026765949,0.00022248608,0.00021220176,0.000009882665,0.0006839768,0.00017973341,0.00017821966,0.00029380812,0.0000012909926],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015202661,0.000031502674,0.000031091568,0.000077512785,0.00015930465,0.00004095715,0.005218619,0.0000013642923,0.00002635136,0.88253325,0.04722604,0.064502],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031929652,0.00005073663,0.00004784881,0.00017475468,0.00015254383,3.8303284e-7,0.00009803557,0.0000020396888,0.000057496753,0.00046435764,0.99843264,0.0001998561],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018702719,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024873605,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9512066,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003133236,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00091053057,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.90727186},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4238265016","doi":"10.22145/flr.36.3.1","title":"The Dangers of Shared Care Legislation: Why Australia Needs (Yet More) Family Law Reform","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Federal Law Review","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Law reform; Family law; Project commissioning; Law; Political science; Publishing","score_opus":0.07022404376108987,"score_gpt":0.3400619872985388,"score_spread":0.26983794353744894,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4238265016","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007963871,0.08538684,0.0000075720423,0.015213415,0.0007552954,0.0009923832,0.000044267083,0.0001038807,0.88953245],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9196423,0.06769514,0.00013799603,0.005830293,0.00045819336,0.000086294196,0.00006367231,0.000019375859,0.0060667316],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986633,0.00012520663,0.0003522364,0.00014069409,0.00045988834,0.00025865197],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992286,0.000042747826,0.00016738476,0.00025400642,0.00021579035,0.000091449496],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00037561337,0.000120479686,0.00025985463,0.000013940581,0.0016373751,0.00007685218,0.00026164632,0.00007821429,0.00019618648],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002345529,0.00008398246,0.000180939,0.00026090431,0.00047707907,0.00029763463,0.000032214786,0.00011917718,0.00003239876],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001297416,0.00002006484,0.00033252465,0.0003761862,0.000034424498,0.000005976057,0.010893646,8.977347e-7,0.000023412902,0.95387524,0.028442638,0.0059819934],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010105302,0.000033169825,0.0009581664,0.00054233725,0.000024548155,0.0000022091303,0.0007425506,7.3907955e-7,0.000011320814,0.000119357304,0.997357,0.00010755534],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.049199093,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011977915,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96891433,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014071117,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007733883,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99966234},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4238434725","doi":"10.2307/3504925","title":"10.2307/3504925","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Time to knit","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy of law; Political philosophy; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Sociology; Comparative law; Politics","score_opus":0.008358234391410172,"score_gpt":0.22909699235097541,"score_spread":0.22073875795956524,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4238434725","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0025829908,0.00002328896,4.091975e-7,0.0017752142,0.0000051424536,0.0001005954,0.0000028509178,0.00011918063,0.99539036],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0021299187,0.0000015995125,0.000024165784,0.00009481963,0.00030040866,0.0000060046764,0.0000022361917,0.0000057206653,0.99743515],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99940425,0.00003960185,0.000077465564,0.00010993309,0.0001849909,0.00018373308],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99971014,0.00002583398,0.000011984363,0.00010177254,0.000029430561,0.00012083983],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00019991628,0.000048643284,0.000065666245,0.000029271061,0.00024550973,0.000052191655,0.0001196165,0.00004381644,0.9959568],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000022894059,0.000050303628,0.00003479083,0.00016923374,0.000043248834,0.00008849401,0.000010253458,0.000038495964,0.9664809],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014991438,0.000017515047,5.750285e-7,5.0148464e-7,0.0000033727217,0.000001209987,0.0004248053,0.00000499056,0.000011265638,0.00005855286,0.085665435,0.9137968],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006357374,0.000040021263,0.00011795018,0.000004143554,0.000004812734,3.1986323e-7,0.000007931828,0.000011864827,0.000006393377,0.000016309148,0.99965537,0.000071325514],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00077239063,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000009959006,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9139899,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003236074,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000039268783,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20513223},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4238445777","doi":"10.1017/s0069005800009437","title":"Canadian Cases in Private International Law in 2006–7 / Jurisprudence canadienne en matière de droit international privé en 2006–7","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Yearbook of international Law/Annuaire canadien de droit international","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Plaintiff; Jurisdiction; Law; Jurisprudence; Political science; Corporation; Business","score_opus":0.00830340332927449,"score_gpt":0.24646524195460523,"score_spread":0.23816183862533075,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4238445777","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3898346,0.00007082551,0.00004716204,0.017159315,0.0034221439,0.00052924245,0.0022262398,0.000056988625,0.5866535],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96765906,0.00029715555,0.0006199357,0.00274773,0.0014677532,0.00011974542,0.0005077758,0.0000691866,0.026511664],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9950921,0.00023840017,0.0011287535,0.00080977194,0.0011810005,0.0015499946],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99647653,0.0003353965,0.00034509163,0.00039465586,0.000825171,0.0016231325],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016407622,0.00043408954,0.00046904094,0.0021927045,0.00037621774,0.00022042957,0.0027766144,0.000510387,0.0038109098],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009910148,0.00061535416,0.00022960326,0.0004954904,0.0005859048,0.0011297354,0.00014058723,0.0007958116,0.00009378477],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000091643225,0.00011440111,0.14168131,0.0000123497975,0.00025588684,0.003255347,0.011633651,0.00058869965,0.000075243835,0.83709353,0.0035863484,0.0016115538],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012405989,0.000067682595,0.09954767,0.000369003,0.00002119777,0.0005848503,0.0013595991,0.0016125726,0.00011674588,0.009757245,0.88455087,0.0007719775],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99245787,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9996558,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8809645,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.033383403,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0065016095,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996298},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4238554487","doi":"10.1787/3f9aa177-en","title":"Directorate for Legal Affairs","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Secretary-General's report to Ministers","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"African Union; China Scholarship Council; European Commission","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.0298367888729463,"score_gpt":0.30493274423607647,"score_spread":0.27509595536313014,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4238554487","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0009169871,0.0002744265,0.00023778377,0.0056379493,0.005399246,0.0019970615,0.00022496715,0.00022511717,0.98508644],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.008533784,0.00013271443,0.0011420184,0.0007795617,0.0030221224,0.00006990326,0.00079725904,0.0001439998,0.9853786],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962294,0.000053598877,0.00094387477,0.0011047167,0.000944851,0.0007235609],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99745196,0.00009847043,0.0007163288,0.00085750927,0.00035299934,0.0005227498],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010055352,0.00058389484,0.0008472423,0.00028432292,0.000534256,0.0003067078,0.00046088238,0.0006440844,0.0012575071],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000094156036,0.0006216144,0.0006849242,0.00009053851,0.00029676163,0.0002433343,0.000114071,0.00031220616,0.00028293076],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00059781363,0.000076899734,0.00031361688,0.0003021583,0.001104286,0.0019876752,0.008588471,0.00008643149,0.00088177767,0.7353133,0.20979504,0.040952504],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002933286,0.00022102061,0.000055597076,0.000109615336,0.00017791525,0.000051374136,0.0002506999,0.00002051868,0.000040375082,0.00097458164,0.9970192,0.00078582426],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002097627,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031698425,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7872241,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00036706598,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011419456,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996555},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4238561584","doi":"10.1007/978-1-4614-6170-8_100280","title":"Legal Issues and Implications","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law and economics; Engineering ethics; Sociology; Engineering","score_opus":0.026284949334195926,"score_gpt":0.31595168043066735,"score_spread":0.2896667310964714,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4238561584","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000016972157,0.0003540534,0.00017305589,0.010765442,0.00011102855,0.00010117278,0.0000045918155,0.00008081979,0.9883929],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0069286004,0.0015273765,0.00008729574,0.0002722492,0.0006950287,0.0000030435606,0.0000064194296,0.000009487627,0.9904705],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995449,0.000007945221,0.000092834205,0.0001448243,0.000119462224,0.00009002325],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996942,0.000032309814,0.000046037905,0.0001163515,0.000055654753,0.00005542398],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00014774816,0.000075220705,0.00010537568,0.000036995607,0.00029865254,0.00008835282,0.000072342555,0.00015950591,0.0017692269],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000009418949,0.00007128931,0.000038208793,0.000007974363,0.00016110162,0.000044755663,0.000023332188,0.000078714686,0.00012021277],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[4.1602075e-7,8.6883944e-7,0.000013596544,0.0000016344052,0.0000057275884,1.2660053e-7,0.0002829493,8.157069e-9,0.0000017198022,0.9547771,0.012706706,0.032209154],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002505053,0.000010926729,0.0001845484,0.000008633683,0.000013894551,5.393127e-7,0.000023188604,6.038728e-7,6.739121e-7,0.043587584,0.95605654,0.00008782242],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029775717,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00416329,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94334984,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000019651054,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000042696527,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991433},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4238683523","doi":"10.1163/2210-7975_hrd-0126-0014","title":"canadian-lawyer-vol32-issue-5-may-2008-62-pp","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"dataset","venue":"Human Rights Documents online","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.02051945768696951,"score_gpt":0.34837898340845347,"score_spread":0.32785952572148397,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4238683523","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"dataset","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"dataset","genre_consensus":"dataset","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00070476235,0.00033269118,7.118873e-7,0.0030667493,0.0027642057,0.0006990148,0.97664046,0.00013219503,0.015659215],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0004494325,0.0007709344,0.00002088153,0.00059214607,0.005923318,0.000036437606,0.87254894,0.000040212377,0.11961769],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9958036,0.00026907813,0.0007032846,0.0008364734,0.001170885,0.0012166888],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972891,0.00008006234,0.0004073776,0.00096919923,0.00024961313,0.0010046093],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00054849737,0.0005761558,0.0006364401,0.00046404405,0.0028967229,0.00039915676,0.0012763786,0.00080534787,0.046177562],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003674665,0.00045151135,0.00023461202,0.00025843058,0.0004067604,0.00049828266,0.00012939554,0.00057131605,0.0028155223],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007798148,0.00016978495,0.000019854893,0.000022520802,0.00010258447,0.000097939315,0.00022751585,7.975406e-8,0.0000020480693,0.0023470707,0.9962255,0.00077735464],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005998484,0.00008944261,0.00008815193,0.00022697977,0.0001350355,0.000002523033,0.000034705856,2.4312723e-7,0.0000035766168,0.0028447257,0.99531835,0.00065641454],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.85497326,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9792202,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.124246985,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013427888,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008665571,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99979365},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4239264341","doi":"10.1515/9780822392170-003","title":"Note on Language","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Linguistics; History; Computer science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.026439676758386103,"score_gpt":0.30687005885796514,"score_spread":0.28043038209957905,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4239264341","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000054361203,0.000060118036,0.000031882584,0.0063233017,0.00031303626,0.00010882349,0.000008959557,0.00014992953,0.99299854],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.006242949,0.00014488227,0.000037793965,0.0018063551,0.0012620977,0.0000010848653,0.000010262891,0.000015958798,0.99047863],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99934715,0.0000085651245,0.00008762835,0.00016528022,0.00029534876,0.00009603388],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99969524,0.000041248306,0.00004645611,0.00010312876,0.000021142314,0.00009278889],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00008633949,0.00009488331,0.000119021286,0.00003260524,0.00014168849,0.000038779708,0.00010901827,0.00019131738,0.0075956727],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001889902,0.00008741652,0.00009093018,0.000012378398,0.00006192494,0.000025829391,0.000019980977,0.00017725129,0.0020265619],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004557031,0.000002062025,3.9007648e-7,0.000002263523,0.000006558045,0.000013823464,0.003691261,6.53878e-8,0.000005282649,0.94990504,0.010691153,0.03567753],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000042522017,0.000034311823,0.0000047226454,0.000019804445,0.000010577821,9.241912e-8,0.00011382585,0.0000015857247,0.000008009623,0.0037983637,0.9958573,0.000108858905],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00068742037,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017033209,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9851662,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000052575193,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000071883376,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99875045},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4239346953","doi":"10.1177/201395251100200202","title":"Collective Action in Labour Conflicts under the Rome II Regulation (Part II)","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Labour Law Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Undo; Action (physics); Interpretation (philosophy); Relation (database); Phenomenon; Labour law; Law and economics; Law; Collective action; Focus (optics); Industrial action; Conflict of laws; Political science; Sociology; Epistemology; Computer science; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.06869349735759056,"score_gpt":0.28998700595435706,"score_spread":0.2212935085967665,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4239346953","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6592708,0.00006701502,0.00007343441,0.0022807121,0.0008936009,0.00015460857,0.000004226177,0.00004992374,0.33720562],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96998644,0.00015973957,0.0000702197,0.00083359896,0.001283237,0.0000025453578,0.000001425708,0.000024591141,0.027638216],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974493,0.0011572122,0.0003666163,0.00019389471,0.0004572184,0.00037580045],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99907714,0.00005028638,0.00028863605,0.00016595943,0.00026108563,0.00015688172],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027599556,0.00013676735,0.00014588909,0.000103017024,0.0040809535,0.0001895799,0.00029923956,0.00006931136,0.0019191607],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000072702554,0.00010851098,0.00008296929,0.00047984766,0.0002479943,0.00056978466,0.00008600196,0.00049104437,0.00007312965],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014933189,0.00021025054,0.0011374112,0.0000038557414,0.000059789447,0.00004514428,0.10735526,0.00006798854,0.0005691317,0.8838112,0.0014074935,0.005183149],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00061558915,0.00019597345,0.27365625,0.000044277356,0.000016542841,0.00003583192,0.0038756288,0.000010936197,0.00015865972,0.0073672486,0.7138634,0.00015966313],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032178985,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011203793,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8764439,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003579463,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018624663,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989932},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4239515316","doi":"10.1163/1875-8096_pplrdc_ej.9789028609020.177_280","title":"La conception du droit international privé d'après la doctrine et la pratique au Canada (Volume 053)","year":2014,"lang":"fr","type":"dataset","venue":"Collected Courses of the Hague Academy of International Law","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Conflict of laws; Doctrine; Political science; Law; Philosophy; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.01202237686975697,"score_gpt":0.2854950348615887,"score_spread":0.27347265799183174,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4239515316","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.044848803,0.00062434503,0.00028331255,0.11557172,0.0131612625,0.0019363641,0.3499753,0.00011088084,0.47348803],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9448111,0.0018479275,0.0001219984,0.001941054,0.0023788128,0.00008236385,0.027979432,0.000048288555,0.020789035],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9944026,0.0016309215,0.0011081237,0.0005253867,0.0019571518,0.00037582056],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9951464,0.001861869,0.0017875202,0.00028488645,0.0007547018,0.00016462203],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018070698,0.00044147027,0.0006536654,0.00019744271,0.0004014333,0.00012934113,0.002570496,0.00093698787,0.0011329026],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011146071,0.0004233074,0.00034630526,0.0004990478,0.0020016837,0.00040457578,0.0004582917,0.001323971,0.000018700275],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015626644,0.00024851787,0.0011438766,0.000071815935,0.0006955184,0.0000065278396,0.0005653739,0.00048156633,0.00014930427,0.5269434,0.46849424,0.0010436205],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00096705003,0.0000660067,0.011557717,0.0006749397,0.00022656578,0.000044604712,0.0001876217,0.0006073145,0.00035520477,0.001315955,0.9836339,0.00036315012],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.37037,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5391845,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8999623,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011876229,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034640038,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998219},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4240019898","doi":"10.4337/9781848445024.00006","title":"Table of jurisprudence","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Edward Elgar Publishing eBooks","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"General Motors of Canada; Jaguar Land Rover; Université Laval; Mattel; RAND Corporation; Loblaw Companies Limited; McDonald's Corporation","keywords":"Table (database); Jurisprudence; Law; Computer science; Political science; Database","score_opus":0.032279226762637794,"score_gpt":0.2693124874955256,"score_spread":0.23703326073288783,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4240019898","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00013925825,0.00062408566,0.000055784658,0.00064188696,0.0014166858,0.00029939544,0.00004040467,0.00021004996,0.99657243],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.012026642,0.00065922516,0.00027179785,0.00022274854,0.0017728416,0.0000095160985,0.000025132826,0.000066271474,0.98494583],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99730206,0.000055419307,0.0005154777,0.00044398964,0.0012395516,0.00044352055],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981071,0.00016347645,0.00053184375,0.0004712738,0.00049711193,0.00022924186],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010367412,0.0002828215,0.00048551985,0.00025249153,0.00057731854,0.0005795802,0.0008190258,0.00076091447,0.0007193892],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00030432348,0.00030772085,0.00024394787,0.000049097864,0.00056729175,0.00077472575,0.00017112514,0.00074296247,0.000060329723],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024352512,0.000020646994,0.00006389319,0.000060220173,0.00011152141,0.00003740356,0.014991962,0.0000017161968,0.00003373347,0.6825042,0.2419453,0.060205083],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013579267,0.000037549024,0.000041880612,0.00020348106,0.00003602017,0.0000039241113,0.00009563281,0.0000017365892,0.00005354927,0.0055681407,0.9935181,0.0003041956],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035987436,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018774219,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7515728,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001443668,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010462998,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999375},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4240545051","doi":"10.1163/37612_wna_adm_adm_1_506_261h","title":"ADM 1/506/261h - from W Barrie, Jno Browy, T Watts","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"dataset","venue":"Warfare in North America, c. 1756-1815","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Art","score_opus":0.02391878310259153,"score_gpt":0.2915504308450175,"score_spread":0.267631647742426,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4240545051","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"dataset","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"dataset","genre_consensus":"dataset","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0026904754,0.0008716235,0.000025504401,0.0035104603,0.0022994562,0.00079199625,0.98573595,0.00026905353,0.0038054606],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.006329538,0.004311903,0.00017493808,0.0032457092,0.0031453974,0.00013147068,0.98195237,0.00007761203,0.0006310434],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9944379,0.0005192423,0.0010074739,0.0013755673,0.0015156788,0.0011441394],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99684125,0.00041350204,0.00067488855,0.001055083,0.00020377916,0.0008114924],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00031298952,0.0007528438,0.0012070696,0.0003174658,0.00067558634,0.00032053166,0.0016312392,0.00071788556,0.0052727317],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000699352,0.00080206525,0.00038071125,0.0017014191,0.00071572606,0.00039379983,0.00043073538,0.0014385009,0.0031314597],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006991561,0.00012485422,0.002739077,0.000046690133,0.00008667994,0.00021172907,0.0030850829,0.000024082125,0.0000027804595,0.000011659659,0.9756267,0.01797077],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00046691674,0.00015590872,0.006260722,0.000118956246,0.0001244733,0.000001258688,0.0013459087,0.000022356431,0.0000023793514,0.00006823515,0.990531,0.000901871],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.14288457,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.18611203,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.043227464,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00040181537,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00091176527,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999443},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4240812274","doi":"10.25071/1925-5624.40381","title":"Note from the Editor","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Tusaaji A Translation Review","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"History","score_opus":0.066109807796035,"score_gpt":0.3453535359672862,"score_spread":0.2792437281712512,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4240812274","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0003169756,0.19257876,0.0058477265,0.7531979,0.002010396,0.0011516721,0.000043363034,0.00023116384,0.04462201],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.25000486,0.57922024,0.0018836638,0.11568669,0.052446533,0.00011637703,0.0001384611,0.00004548968,0.0004576682],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991144,0.00018368385,0.00018195095,0.0001269985,0.0002874569,0.00010554218],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99954057,0.00018072309,0.000055940767,0.00009764412,0.000041737247,0.000083404564],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003610837,0.00006036899,0.00012545627,0.000004185224,0.00025910026,0.000036823647,0.00015558313,0.000039393042,0.0016749679],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000093650066,0.000043083826,0.00009413967,0.0002270382,0.000055337223,0.00012149562,0.0000047274043,0.000098157674,0.00028582232],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009785145,0.000014193514,0.0003232991,0.00014238249,0.00001660036,8.79088e-7,0.021060739,0.0000016177111,0.00008140583,0.0035806969,0.11614664,0.8586218],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008267081,0.000008356569,0.00052740495,0.00021013974,0.00004753361,3.4855805e-8,0.00005285737,0.000053700493,0.0000034224029,0.00012359412,0.99883336,0.00005694976],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00074979046,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004645926,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8826867,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000105619265,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006646601,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99923766},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4240824345","doi":"10.1163/1570-6664_iyb_sim_org_40510","title":"University of Toronto Faculty of Law","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"dataset","venue":"International Year Book and Statesmen's Who's Who","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Library science; Sociology; Political science; Media studies; Computer science","score_opus":0.01397937474049559,"score_gpt":0.29564319088668084,"score_spread":0.28166381614618524,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4240824345","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"dataset","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"dataset","genre_consensus":"dataset","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00054642546,0.00027788355,0.000035338497,0.0005030902,0.0004017776,0.00014841421,0.8598561,0.000014911339,0.13821602],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0131508345,0.021562966,0.00022394965,0.00055882306,0.0010812104,0.0000033776698,0.87148833,0.000033139368,0.09189734],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999063,0.000060812952,0.00017167884,0.00017602535,0.0004126354,0.000115802824],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999317,0.000063130734,0.00021960722,0.00012335548,0.00020721697,0.00006968697],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002345937,0.000102325255,0.00022561359,0.000029794175,0.000120201454,0.000027038193,0.00028757507,0.00014476209,0.002756149],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000019835501,0.00011021514,0.00007613838,0.000017292881,0.00029834715,0.00018855654,0.00008899318,0.00009520884,0.00001627716],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000040669303,0.000032612566,0.000072529656,0.00002548505,0.0001026117,0.0000024601516,0.0015402603,0.0000011471311,0.0000038657417,0.026006136,0.97136575,0.00080644386],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026961003,0.000055071814,0.00045850236,0.00007547341,0.000035139074,2.7358988e-7,0.0004451236,0.000009117836,0.0000075826147,0.00024884802,0.9982923,0.00010293604],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09205848,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03659008,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0554684,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009885741,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008117445,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9981555},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4241033154","doi":"10.1186/1916-0216-43-3","title":"Reviewer acknowledgement 2013","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Acknowledgement; Otorhinolaryngology; Head and neck surgery; General surgery; Medicine; Volume (thermodynamics); Library science; Surgery; Computer science","score_opus":0.027564179049071557,"score_gpt":0.3029760507050092,"score_spread":0.27541187165593767,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4241033154","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9810995,0.0039907214,0.00008900426,0.0048985993,0.0030345207,0.000072639334,3.415865e-7,0.000011936209,0.0068027647],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97564447,0.018777005,0.00015502439,0.0011450583,0.0030222684,0.0000032319956,9.689047e-7,0.000010553097,0.0012414225],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986686,0.0003506081,0.00044004846,0.0001026624,0.00020848212,0.00022957954],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99846154,0.00042801152,0.00030208644,0.000090702335,0.00053914223,0.00017851277],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002745403,0.000085107094,0.00038933105,0.00014283572,0.0002605113,0.000033783417,0.000091485024,0.000111692156,0.00045434412],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001046873,0.00006948992,0.00015824613,0.00012107768,0.00015426273,0.00024088149,0.000024973246,0.00018274719,0.00004713845],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008408013,0.00023411436,0.65132535,0.00010669188,0.00010683868,0.000044006676,0.0026221895,8.6004513e-7,0.0001613117,0.0040419623,0.26387456,0.077398],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013665484,0.00006814819,0.270658,0.00010523956,0.000020278274,0.000015869748,0.000025650821,0.000005337422,0.000010138666,0.00026676024,0.7286279,0.0000600437],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00009694535,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00023357941,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.46475333,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000027372716,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000118242286,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49747494},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4241228602","doi":"10.1017/s0069005800011036","title":"Index of Cases / Index de la jurisprudence","year":2013,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Yearbook of international Law/Annuaire canadien de droit international","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Index (typography); Computer science","score_opus":0.007563593112254729,"score_gpt":0.2599177418427528,"score_spread":0.25235414873049805,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4241228602","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.32497668,0.0005848486,0.000267126,0.0118684145,0.0031407897,0.00032852558,0.0009003993,0.000026086067,0.6579071],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9537571,0.00025671918,0.00024552565,0.0011662244,0.000939066,0.000044790737,0.000050040362,0.000035589957,0.043504916],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971856,0.00019046906,0.00068341586,0.0003817354,0.000855392,0.00070340675],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967422,0.0004052378,0.00042293742,0.00025743683,0.0012186677,0.00095353666],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007645799,0.0002575403,0.0003211427,0.0005774881,0.00017918317,0.00015758871,0.0012496659,0.00044312552,0.0070916875],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005051618,0.00034971276,0.00024095034,0.0002774241,0.0014733408,0.0007119721,0.00008092579,0.00042445294,0.00008117352],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028979603,0.00009639725,0.06734495,0.00003583379,0.00036782803,0.0002712396,0.0032016668,0.0003095734,0.00009358509,0.90582067,0.01287334,0.009555928],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005824429,0.000108274886,0.0918234,0.00053561234,0.000051232302,0.00034672726,0.001220803,0.0043222434,0.00024757994,0.025307396,0.8750016,0.00045265091],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9314092,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.83223385,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8805133,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004554014,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037118853,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998955},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4241336499","doi":"10.4095/301343","title":"Families with Children Living at Home, 1996 - Common-law couples with children living at home","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"report","venue":"","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Developmental psychology; Sociology; Gerontology; Medicine","score_opus":0.015432594256732846,"score_gpt":0.26993175529211794,"score_spread":0.2544991610353851,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4241336499","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.749834,0.0014431705,0.000009580867,0.00021106459,0.00069079094,0.00097458676,0.00013792927,0.00054067594,0.2461582],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9366176,0.009180617,0.00022589463,0.00016841028,0.002341314,0.000073490824,0.00031946757,0.00017678757,0.05089638],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99397403,0.00018321598,0.0007233463,0.0011706349,0.002808015,0.0011407362],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99662095,0.0006189142,0.0008546109,0.0009453767,0.0004789264,0.00048124048],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017050871,0.0008538472,0.001235511,0.00029142405,0.0032163614,0.0005640415,0.00086625706,0.0009969375,0.0019772751],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009160399,0.00064179796,0.00028496343,0.0004978079,0.0015234362,0.0005050613,0.0006796899,0.0011236301,0.00008992639],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032440137,0.0001499631,0.9826518,0.000055064887,0.000505421,0.000015713662,0.009782826,0.000008317752,0.000014110176,0.0005484706,0.0025755158,0.0036603573],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002707126,0.00025298315,0.7823206,0.0010033431,0.00033901242,0.0002138747,0.00062397955,0.0000054515876,0.000011618014,0.000009503726,0.21371993,0.001228961],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.21196002,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6349807,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.42302066,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009078529,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012188123,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99960333},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4241932694","doi":"10.1017/s0714980800017128","title":"CJG volume 27 issue 1 Cover and Back matter","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"Canadian Journal on Aging / La Revue canadienne du vieillissement","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institute of Aging","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Cover (algebra); Volume (thermodynamics); Content (measure theory); Action (physics); Computer science; Environmental science; Mathematics; Engineering; Physics; Mechanical engineering; Thermodynamics","score_opus":0.012351670177991006,"score_gpt":0.23817557371660042,"score_spread":0.22582390353860943,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4241932694","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03265903,0.0055891853,0.000077266326,0.053513475,0.016465351,0.00076310633,0.00045850445,0.000017827038,0.89045626],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.040524624,0.0073728543,0.000050681607,0.005309655,0.005364527,0.00001600502,0.00010609747,0.0001072551,0.9411483],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966978,0.00037255176,0.00061871874,0.000593554,0.00026115924,0.0014562563],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9952981,0.00009711686,0.0004299404,0.00036642447,0.0003118703,0.00349654],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00092447037,0.0005048228,0.000633853,0.0007089693,0.0019338124,0.0007855452,0.0005386544,0.00045128595,0.14245094],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008369662,0.00055321056,0.00022169351,0.0003227772,0.00041975957,0.00030530774,0.000030599847,0.0010780995,0.029462162],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000059247977,0.000011897971,0.001438802,0.0000630745,0.000094981784,0.00057120866,0.015708812,0.00008942081,0.0000017833082,0.00020000228,0.97962517,0.00218893],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032467398,0.000089267574,0.0016159227,0.0007662332,0.00005650498,0.00040242542,0.00094949716,0.000023376071,0.0000010443217,0.000014831749,0.9951371,0.000619131],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2609731,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.46683863,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20586552,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026410967,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024635107,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99969196},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4242352726","doi":"10.1046/j.1525-1497.18.s1.2.x","title":"Precourses","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of General Internal Medicine","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Family medicine","score_opus":0.03146099782636478,"score_gpt":0.36305049893967956,"score_spread":0.33158950111331476,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4242352726","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4152107,0.0025167344,0.002068737,0.011283649,0.0064708483,0.000068925794,5.09628e-7,0.000014186612,0.5623657],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96264,0.0009767141,0.00052615086,0.00061048137,0.003998153,4.649356e-7,1.2893601e-7,0.0000063036887,0.031241639],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988513,0.0001483708,0.00034662255,0.000055882396,0.00045048507,0.00014731105],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99916184,0.00006757445,0.00027854746,0.00005389893,0.0002645991,0.00017355946],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012044789,0.00006183353,0.00017718493,0.00011218929,0.00010094533,0.000018728957,0.00015449741,0.000042893986,0.0016985873],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005517386,0.00004296357,0.00007466663,0.00010231619,0.00015875118,0.0001526667,0.0000057234292,0.00016913019,0.000007980892],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00029219536,0.00030888288,0.04821178,0.000020342986,0.00037973613,0.00036509373,0.042946868,0.000055983488,0.018013895,0.22212362,0.5453561,0.12192548],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005002031,0.0003946468,0.0032163325,0.00010796179,0.000032082997,0.000100297504,0.001160992,0.000005629135,0.0007158501,0.0018653383,0.9918491,0.00005152669],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011494474,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00017167687,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.54742926,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006836479,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009585123,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999214},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4243302066","doi":"10.1017/cbo9781139057387.001","title":"Note on the text","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Content (measure theory); Computer science; Information retrieval; World Wide Web; Mathematics","score_opus":0.04294638317180457,"score_gpt":0.23362169383886533,"score_spread":0.19067531066706075,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4243302066","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00004840105,0.000032226635,0.000057115663,0.0002995247,0.00039620962,0.0003457312,0.00005793306,0.00011403777,0.9986488],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0046341806,0.00022785825,0.0000051912925,0.0002750698,0.00034938334,4.6837167e-7,0.000005153822,0.00002119165,0.9944815],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989751,0.000070496695,0.00009808016,0.0002874483,0.00033600128,0.00023286905],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99908483,0.0001362622,0.00015033978,0.0003893705,0.00011322201,0.000125974],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002241906,0.00019585463,0.00018048292,0.00007981211,0.0008437996,0.00005094211,0.00053692487,0.0003335632,0.00009442507],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000015362068,0.00017747753,0.00019159114,0.000006717851,0.0004999685,0.000053003878,0.00013574747,0.00041565456,0.00011470338],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037375034,0.0000046835753,4.1542592e-7,0.0000040990803,0.00003196598,0.000032615684,0.0010065858,6.914173e-8,0.000002566323,0.9480582,0.045985505,0.004835928],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000113671646,0.000035228622,0.000015455525,0.00006499363,0.0000791588,5.9227585e-7,0.00009497943,0.0000014569252,0.000030301493,0.000080861966,0.9992743,0.00020900028],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002525274,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00010378485,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9532888,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018229811,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015096396,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.72373235},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4243388527","doi":"10.1080/00358530902760549","title":"Book Reviews","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Round Table","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Commonwealth; Appeal; Law; Jurisdiction; Supreme court; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.031067223381341512,"score_gpt":0.32478701842220403,"score_spread":0.29371979504086254,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4243388527","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0027918532,0.03813559,0.00021816991,0.023898665,0.00028576414,0.00028822356,5.569178e-7,0.000075414326,0.9343058],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.26013368,0.025562413,0.00011117067,0.02329555,0.001839525,0.000017597074,0.0000025293702,0.0000080126965,0.6890295],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99950695,0.000075498,0.00008040077,0.00006352407,0.00011910858,0.00015450732],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997598,0.00002408485,0.000034745637,0.00012998318,0.000017192122,0.000034229095],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006896024,0.000036465644,0.00006842881,0.000008605104,0.0005792862,0.00008068643,0.00013404242,0.000024197694,0.001073645],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000032568878,0.000023692874,0.00003137042,0.00012646338,0.00004384796,0.00018194648,0.00000689176,0.00005261666,0.00025622587],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000764693,0.000044782544,0.00006850839,0.0000025473223,0.000005114329,0.0000010155512,0.008523424,0.0000035849475,0.00018714031,0.16970088,0.71589464,0.10556072],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000037841277,0.000016332326,0.00028309185,0.0000065642703,0.000006027256,2.995351e-7,0.0001193971,0.000005655127,0.000018692997,0.0032242963,0.996246,0.00003580479],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010767857,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00022691787,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28035137,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000032688582,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000034960034,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998395},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4243725796","doi":"10.1007/978-3-319-06910-4","title":"Introduction to Law","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Law Foundation of Nova Scotia","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.012874173753651175,"score_gpt":0.28247392631571394,"score_spread":0.26959975256206276,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4243725796","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000024777144,0.000015611256,0.0004212714,0.025191419,0.0016083224,0.00017498304,0.000001453887,0.00014046597,0.972444],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00013625626,0.000021031858,0.00011325741,0.0015293616,0.021888228,0.0000060772054,0.00001556274,0.000011893735,0.9762783],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991958,0.000035888716,0.00011309152,0.00021771195,0.0002868548,0.00015063793],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995621,0.00002463857,0.00004294267,0.00016969483,0.00008659369,0.00011404869],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00040352467,0.000083864805,0.00012836605,0.000051462623,0.00028846008,0.00008302176,0.00011967226,0.00020195925,0.0047594276],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002520318,0.00008287407,0.000058694517,0.000042647574,0.000087604196,0.00006453815,0.000023778022,0.00011279015,0.0021288025],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000011653392,0.000001663768,1.6122968e-7,0.0000015994211,0.00000280311,9.593057e-8,0.00042575024,3.2109486e-7,0.0000012571403,0.50905824,0.48482108,0.0056858566],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024108318,0.000027479718,0.000003021895,0.000007874729,0.000010674721,1.7044634e-7,0.000030843763,4.52218e-7,0.000004231821,0.0074649616,0.9923167,0.00010948348],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020631931,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016847817,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5074956,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018707689,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014202838,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99864817},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4243792749","doi":"10.1093/ww/9780199540884.013.u18635","title":"Hall, Her Honour Jean Graham, (26 March 1917–14 March 2005), a Circuit Judge (formerly Deputy Chairman, South-East London Quarter Sessions), 1971–89","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"reference-entry","venue":"Who Was Who","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Honour; Quarter (Canadian coin); Management; Political science; Law; History; Archaeology; Economics","score_opus":0.04260345588085104,"score_gpt":0.30596902971586704,"score_spread":0.263365573835016,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4243792749","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014748426,0.012778951,0.0016928451,0.011337129,0.008759106,0.0035444687,0.0012240778,0.0011763392,0.9447387],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.08279799,0.055878066,0.00016532221,0.0013736588,0.014460369,0.00032579928,0.0010328427,0.0004773749,0.8434886],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9907844,0.0006877815,0.0013185975,0.001648286,0.0027957011,0.002765249],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958797,0.0003812035,0.00079064496,0.0012009451,0.00056349736,0.0011839942],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021889277,0.0011107282,0.0014728277,0.0009481008,0.002064911,0.00076465006,0.0015244685,0.0021020852,0.003951238],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017383363,0.0010594476,0.0008197492,0.0009843949,0.0007031123,0.0006654061,0.00034501156,0.002513959,0.0014441614],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021885951,0.0004907837,0.0051230025,0.00062270253,0.00041159758,0.0001916074,0.026964055,0.0000039054303,0.000010911496,0.0036275387,0.70324737,0.25908768],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010177989,0.00020416893,0.009326523,0.0013347393,0.00018059209,0.000015127473,0.00413002,0.00003867957,0.000004443171,0.00042262312,0.9820538,0.0012714422],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0119332755,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03902906,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.27880648,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009025564,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018922806,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997873},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W424419290","doi":"10.7202/043792ar","title":"GÉRALD GOLDSTEIN et ETHEL GROFFIER, Traité de droit civil – Droit international privé, t. 2, Cowansville, Éditions Yvon Blais, 2003, 1 253 p., ISBN 2-89451-676-2.","year":2004,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Trait; Political science; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.010452086148816207,"score_gpt":0.2592442953242487,"score_spread":0.2487922091754325,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W424419290","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5015712,0.005836437,0.08360182,0.09611414,0.0075366045,0.0016371614,0.0019481913,0.0007985364,0.30095595],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7844147,0.0089934645,0.005246699,0.007726839,0.0027470386,0.00019710939,0.0006912506,0.0002051275,0.18977775],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99491423,0.00041886058,0.00092657935,0.000933231,0.0012582199,0.0015488646],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99741614,0.00029272767,0.00048278048,0.0005653449,0.00044949361,0.0007934861],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018006954,0.000591181,0.00063902047,0.00038168006,0.001372043,0.00049920415,0.001089266,0.0014192375,0.00276606],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004414301,0.00080375775,0.0005398959,0.0013990173,0.0022792846,0.0010352156,0.00011337688,0.001752897,0.00043417324],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008971003,0.0007205008,0.00036576833,0.00007989978,0.0003436506,0.00016824064,0.03109831,0.0013975278,0.0007264581,0.91999775,0.014300122,0.030712046],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0026439668,0.00030204316,0.0047850814,0.00051897863,0.00028989764,0.00024434188,0.00473191,0.0009642715,0.00050737505,0.20735349,0.7765465,0.001112135],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008708777,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01851781,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7622464,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005439432,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013045185,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99992806},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4244296500","doi":"10.21991/c9h66z","title":"PROCEEDINGS OF THE 1996 PLURALT CONFERENCE - SHOULD WE KEEP TALKING?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Engineering ethics; Political science; Engineering","score_opus":0.061589044021180525,"score_gpt":0.283101541909172,"score_spread":0.2215124978879915,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4244296500","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.058460675,0.00060676155,0.004852343,0.015206636,0.0034534638,0.0012177514,0.00018287585,0.0002905364,0.9157289],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9969496,0.00018680409,0.00051566784,0.00058796996,0.00017485546,0.000056303572,0.000008409398,0.000008423945,0.0015119703],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997483,0.000041848187,0.0005763562,0.00041688958,0.00080876774,0.0006731481],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99835914,0.00007902998,0.00036493933,0.00022544776,0.00075131096,0.00022013146],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00049848907,0.00026715765,0.00031085132,0.00015743484,0.0022329714,0.00009466225,0.0007058608,0.00027109313,0.00089713855],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00035980257,0.00021625428,0.0002946222,0.0005873695,0.010942236,0.0008785888,0.00021892232,0.00033406087,0.00006451684],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039054707,0.000103682745,0.04274248,0.000018006673,0.000044052667,0.000001917747,0.0016147939,0.0000049677155,0.00043404722,0.9514476,0.0016484355,0.0019009857],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001198904,0.00009735866,0.007970355,0.0005201393,0.0001374032,0.00008394962,0.0129386885,0.00015401667,0.0032483728,0.13432606,0.8386506,0.0006741605],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016509269,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014818403,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9384889,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001929162,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016747155,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999066},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4244735823","doi":"10.1163/9789401204613_008","title":"Legal Authority and Ethical Platforms: The Ottawa Treaty Comes to Fruition","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Treaty; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.05314283259170686,"score_gpt":0.34710285044479716,"score_spread":0.2939600178530903,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4244735823","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00090243225,0.000085041305,0.0003650845,0.01131445,0.00037177163,0.00036184443,0.000019095993,0.000107351276,0.9864729],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.081909575,0.00035960978,0.00016339326,0.003343739,0.0013991002,0.000008062878,0.000016966838,0.000021774296,0.9127778],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986956,0.000021700947,0.00023816404,0.0002583772,0.0005465288,0.00023963796],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992195,0.00027368407,0.00005502569,0.00016302596,0.00009377057,0.0001950258],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014767695,0.00017197104,0.0002155787,0.00008279714,0.0008160399,0.00016359867,0.0001514262,0.000882889,0.0013061466],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000061781924,0.000115182986,0.000104579296,0.000037341866,0.00036300076,0.00008368882,0.00005680363,0.0007566371,0.00007901616],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012309105,0.000003878245,0.000032680575,0.0000036744984,0.000016066662,0.000005039105,0.0025002921,7.0600116e-8,9.542595e-7,0.96578014,0.0051585096,0.02648639],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008862116,0.00006342311,0.0007446686,0.000025329951,0.00003256555,0.0000033175415,0.00037691148,0.0000031244076,0.0000040101136,0.034247596,0.96424526,0.00016519897],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00691222,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04405192,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9590867,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011517817,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010894974,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99970084},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4245762063","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780190682910.003.0001","title":"Introduction","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law and economics; Corporate governance; Political science; Subject (documents); Horizontal and vertical; Focus (optics); Law; Sociology; Computer science; Economics; Mathematics; Management; Geometry","score_opus":0.020101474425283428,"score_gpt":0.23727013917897613,"score_spread":0.2171686647536927,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4245762063","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000030626437,0.000020433266,0.0001275315,0.00026617973,0.0010831069,0.00023854214,0.000022602368,0.00018724913,0.99802375],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00004165222,0.0002924142,0.00006533656,0.000028469254,0.00525485,3.6407172e-7,0.000030827,0.000015896558,0.9942702],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998928,0.00009865662,0.00009499876,0.0003175235,0.00032212777,0.00023869245],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992597,0.00003088302,0.00014584287,0.00026528022,0.00017823392,0.00012002321],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00023856146,0.00014638432,0.000175007,0.00011149301,0.0007013829,0.000063378946,0.00032918528,0.00039055807,0.0003478003],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000013122759,0.00018456229,0.00012195342,0.000015107291,0.00046347923,0.000121512705,0.00011249584,0.00023834863,0.0000073012875],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003214328,0.0000057768325,7.895049e-7,0.000010471498,0.000034924517,0.000007544637,0.0016815418,1.9706843e-7,0.0000015142805,0.6162688,0.37281612,0.009140145],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001438373,0.00004094469,0.000003742213,0.000023473565,0.00008597702,6.7887095e-7,0.00022532568,0.000002101586,0.000008184958,0.0005139777,0.9987579,0.00019384181],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00047527347,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00049425906,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6259418,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004674313,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00040488463,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7526232},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4246450512","doi":"10.1139/cjce-2020-0659","title":"Note of appreciation","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Engineering","score_opus":0.014410527099977774,"score_gpt":0.22731834611080218,"score_spread":0.2129078190108244,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4246450512","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.496124,0.004808547,0.21390265,0.04735241,0.0070601394,0.000503114,0.000043124433,0.00010484525,0.23010117],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99929696,0.000023228533,0.00012574624,0.000057346344,0.00047032995,1.4371011e-7,2.1559057e-7,0.00000433031,0.00002166853],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999573,0.000011044282,0.0001547881,0.000029169913,0.00012244284,0.000109562076],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994184,0.000024901581,0.00008359514,0.000024418587,0.00009625005,0.00035245833],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020831959,0.00003192691,0.000086009946,0.00008328332,0.000046978505,0.000017765815,0.00009083584,0.00003473052,0.00017266086],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00026868694,0.000035466794,0.000047424233,0.0001586868,0.000017664916,0.000120385565,0.0000018273787,0.00008573863,0.0000015924849],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006436613,0.000038370654,0.03440305,0.00035434155,0.00032789286,0.00026946445,0.43660668,0.2672975,0.022216119,0.10801138,0.024486946,0.10592387],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021676451,0.000071217604,0.007307843,0.00007372758,0.000020876487,0.0000036599968,0.00053943414,0.0032670724,0.000355819,0.00008860798,0.9879529,0.000102082384],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030498637,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15008116,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9634659,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006727151,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00048370135,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8654277},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4246582876","doi":"10.1017/s0008413100001195","title":"Note from the Editor","year":2009,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Journal of Linguistics / La revue canadienne de linguistique","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Content (measure theory); Applied linguistics; Computer science; Cognitive linguistics; Linguistics; Sociology; Psychology; Data science; World Wide Web; Philosophy; Mathematics; Cognition","score_opus":0.013109162823863268,"score_gpt":0.26829837782857663,"score_spread":0.25518921500471337,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4246582876","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11623035,0.051284544,0.0012021059,0.4184599,0.24048503,0.0009756891,0.0011950599,0.000060232793,0.1701071],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8294079,0.0005547827,0.00077925535,0.002903091,0.16233936,0.0000015894967,0.0000070901942,0.00003441195,0.00397253],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964737,0.00085285166,0.00086372835,0.00025103457,0.000259655,0.0012989793],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9922008,0.0019709473,0.00082240073,0.000535513,0.0023435566,0.0021267775],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004594472,0.00032633473,0.00046363167,0.00014383202,0.0017894909,0.00048517474,0.0014561076,0.00051644415,0.00022483726],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03364467,0.0002599061,0.00033086393,0.00052492035,0.0011272416,0.000042887135,0.000019509203,0.0018023326,0.00002052811],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000049718667,0.00004282804,0.0014217742,0.000026442221,0.00016747252,0.0023972597,0.12690258,0.0006492992,0.000016156615,0.7589833,0.094152965,0.015190197],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023521892,0.00017170586,0.0049165646,0.00053472223,0.00030749702,0.00013002711,0.0012235652,0.0003341202,0.000010465698,0.05590618,0.9359497,0.0002802372],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7182382,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97845024,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84179676,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021689339,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009013491,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99998534},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4246782948","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1705620","title":"Review of Guardianship, Custody and Access Under the Domestic Relations Act of Alberta (Part 6 of 6) Summary Proceedings; Appendix A; Selected Bibliography and Amalgamation of Statutes","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legal guardian; Statute; Law; Political science; Library science; Computer science","score_opus":0.011486792671628053,"score_gpt":0.3058262696752231,"score_spread":0.29433947700359503,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4246782948","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9749616,0.019740716,0.00008067797,0.0017014816,0.00007399931,0.00033045904,0.000006038144,0.000006104006,0.0030989582],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.81988245,0.17996691,0.000022012066,0.000016504595,0.00004346369,0.0000027813842,0.000003760791,0.0000055133696,0.000056570854],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986897,0.00008727736,0.0004397321,0.000099219156,0.00029458938,0.00038945233],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99845916,0.00026493674,0.0006649901,0.00007631827,0.00048444467,0.00005017415],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021924686,0.00008275397,0.000239696,0.00066125684,0.00020185743,0.000031759573,0.00018908022,0.00007503502,0.000054504053],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00023855155,0.00006148739,0.00007636183,0.0025939897,0.00034854742,0.00043580832,0.00002657077,0.0005589459,2.2948525e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017789986,0.0002948037,0.38537535,0.0020286562,0.00078642287,1.9388922e-7,0.007918354,0.000007752053,0.011684594,0.5682762,0.0033068156,0.020142913],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0031146044,0.0020007358,0.6772891,0.00814929,0.002191643,0.00019454381,0.01767903,0.00013220307,0.0026683046,0.23338197,0.052373078,0.0008254504],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017538795,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005946324,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.33489427,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000022809154,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007937201,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33181885},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4247294679","doi":"10.1007/978-1-4939-7131-2_100458","title":"Guilt by Association","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Association (psychology); Psychology; Psychotherapist","score_opus":0.018629968408582956,"score_gpt":0.28077102604928944,"score_spread":0.2621410576407065,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4247294679","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000018335308,0.00010870375,0.000022081846,0.0057068886,0.00070063904,0.0001181844,0.000019714043,0.00012326392,0.9931822],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00019194267,0.00052296056,0.000062157334,0.00042695264,0.0015241345,0.000001933199,0.000029352334,0.0000150431515,0.9972255],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99901205,0.000017155795,0.0001458296,0.00016852775,0.0004909647,0.00016543946],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99923813,0.000059100617,0.00017502927,0.00028057882,0.00017564559,0.00007152915],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00047246562,0.00009977835,0.00013045849,0.000035653848,0.00028329605,0.00008079863,0.00032348014,0.00047484972,0.03651093],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017315292,0.00010121867,0.00008792979,0.000014532918,0.00006929511,0.00007495507,0.00007129487,0.000118051445,0.0019465751],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[9.612543e-7,0.00000263981,0.000020085214,9.116939e-7,0.000019264447,2.078238e-7,0.00076456764,2.3811901e-9,0.0000037066661,0.1809168,0.81616026,0.0021105683],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000045642988,0.000024731396,0.0000069768203,0.000010958913,0.000021550013,3.9690278e-8,0.000041361076,5.170271e-7,0.0000050044187,0.042193476,0.9575266,0.00012314213],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011215946,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027823753,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14136632,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00037186098,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009212514,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988305},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4247492084","doi":"10.26443/el.v38i1.7","title":"Note from the Editor","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Education Libraries","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.02327162615347551,"score_gpt":0.32933951579991416,"score_spread":0.30606788964643866,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4247492084","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08953173,0.00068982854,0.00017024575,0.3902953,0.062169153,0.00024756853,0.000018012128,0.00014330784,0.45673487],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9251249,0.00008146572,0.00039023894,0.0012090905,0.05700911,0.000018751305,0.0000126474015,0.000005450076,0.016148338],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995955,0.000041519877,0.000059227434,0.00008083123,0.00013992119,0.000082997045],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99937207,0.0001804245,0.00008104778,0.00028741983,0.000036294776,0.000042735464],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000121492376,0.000035213132,0.00003655047,0.000007838923,0.0025237945,0.0010093013,0.0003523633,0.00004123675,0.0007182208],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004885303,0.000026267251,0.000023542785,0.000023596012,0.0003030058,0.00095419725,0.000034443117,0.000052662766,0.00008011096],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000046050245,0.000030220674,0.019480417,7.95348e-7,0.000004965259,4.5658947e-8,0.04141387,8.3605634e-8,0.000015565785,0.2422317,0.64611584,0.05070192],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023388138,0.000002289261,0.12522422,0.0000064717856,0.0000036838612,1.459645e-8,0.0026515834,8.344847e-7,0.000057358593,0.014423329,0.8575741,0.000032723034],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009109841,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017209285,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83559316,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000013240233,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00080902275,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99877477},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4247751161","doi":"10.7202/1082032ar","title":"Common Law","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law","score_opus":0.04743022982172887,"score_gpt":0.31088208614180773,"score_spread":0.26345185632007884,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4247751161","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005620383,0.00006562056,0.00003299067,0.022538586,0.00040365246,0.00004945372,0.0000068122763,0.00006208861,0.97122043],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99436647,0.00007826179,0.000099699915,0.004358266,0.0009596147,6.9308146e-7,6.384109e-7,0.000006856547,0.00012950492],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991453,0.000108217835,0.00015574836,0.00008298455,0.00030632876,0.00020138065],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994985,0.000029791145,0.0000699117,0.000049313032,0.000059201986,0.000293281],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00032974055,0.000056263012,0.0001011375,0.000009357114,0.0045329607,0.000111979425,0.00016376449,0.00005301882,0.00074389897],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000015763866,0.000051888394,0.00007831731,0.00009262917,0.00013811806,0.00024348588,0.000024392339,0.00023311177,0.00011065651],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001182417,0.000014270322,0.00010679699,0.00000143664,0.000009620814,0.000024082256,0.0013290423,0.000004487562,0.00004739175,0.99017036,0.0008279754,0.007452742],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017739943,0.000054622888,0.00009246375,0.0000066998455,0.000009056295,0.0000103662005,0.00047706833,0.000015928426,0.00014354014,0.0022628806,0.9966807,0.000069295944],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0050602076,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.031423192,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9958527,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000045573066,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000070675346,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.996763},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4248061299","doi":"10.1163/2210-7975_hrd-0126-0020","title":"canadian-lawyer-vol32-issue-11-novdec-2008-62-pp","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"dataset","venue":"Human Rights Documents online","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law","score_opus":0.019587261608767958,"score_gpt":0.3425685679876989,"score_spread":0.32298130637893097,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4248061299","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"dataset","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"dataset","genre_consensus":"dataset","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0013321221,0.00030855354,9.991373e-7,0.0030469703,0.002964007,0.0007630004,0.9809463,0.00014389501,0.010494161],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00045970627,0.00068491924,0.000025006442,0.00061832584,0.006221016,0.00004049494,0.88859135,0.000046000274,0.10331318],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9954955,0.0002731953,0.00077013375,0.0009043661,0.0012591337,0.0012976935],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997059,0.00008394258,0.000453512,0.0010509415,0.0002880734,0.0010645484],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00058761693,0.00062385545,0.00068796374,0.00051077903,0.0030160618,0.00043390263,0.0013796532,0.00085821486,0.042271107],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000040749906,0.00049094314,0.00024907698,0.00030257597,0.00043718686,0.0005480856,0.00014407467,0.000529121,0.0023015942],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000072141306,0.00019761296,0.00003149384,0.00002440315,0.00009219377,0.000108184875,0.0002358854,1.00397806e-7,0.000002057347,0.0027722213,0.9959947,0.0005339637],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00070347334,0.00008157235,0.00012129048,0.00024156267,0.00014332643,0.000002912969,0.00003992953,3.5055498e-7,0.0000034633433,0.0030692208,0.99488413,0.0007087825],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.862053,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98852503,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12647207,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014303466,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009365274,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99975425},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4248247390","doi":"10.1353/cch.2011.0029","title":"Note from the Editor","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Colonialism and Colonial History","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Colonialism; Empire; Elite; Politics; Creole language; History; Kingdom; Classics; Sociology; Media studies; Political science; Law; Ancient history; Archaeology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.025735048849180563,"score_gpt":0.2619494154182394,"score_spread":0.23621436656905884,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4248247390","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.88747877,0.00839101,0.00015011826,0.014304434,0.05290951,0.00027755415,0.000015812844,0.000041007854,0.036431793],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97950965,0.00053912745,0.00023456513,0.00096124975,0.017682284,0.0000026670525,3.7971802e-7,0.0000076072033,0.0010624685],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99896556,0.00019057225,0.00026155374,0.00008206467,0.00035016882,0.0001501009],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99909127,0.00019178327,0.0003178843,0.00008956772,0.000183336,0.00012616649],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008004206,0.00007313102,0.00016267986,0.000039876544,0.00037283875,0.000022983884,0.00024896918,0.000117409676,0.00048000616],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012629414,0.00005431243,0.00008918059,0.000053676667,0.0004622503,0.00020376909,0.000026202448,0.00021839161,0.00000863027],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008778583,0.0001646148,0.0027814324,0.0000042991237,0.00005839043,0.00007187119,0.39064342,2.608766e-7,0.00051585777,0.02188959,0.56800014,0.01499225],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034246757,0.0001877329,0.02098832,0.000011533432,0.000059713617,0.0000043482883,0.000363097,0.0000016869203,0.000012185425,0.0014090324,0.9765523,0.00006756429],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009122116,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0047129,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.40855217,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002658013,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005752242,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9974762},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4248492875","doi":"10.1017/9781316676868.004","title":"Note on the text","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Content (measure theory); Computer science; Information retrieval; World Wide Web; Database; Mathematics","score_opus":0.01822239021382028,"score_gpt":0.29809920493283937,"score_spread":0.2798768147190191,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4248492875","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000026134144,0.000049841252,0.000051063238,0.007111283,0.00037652813,0.00013245411,0.0000035621827,0.0001501115,0.99212253],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.001035393,0.00007865435,0.000018269393,0.0007303787,0.0013906285,0.0000045626184,0.0000021286899,0.000049540326,0.99669045],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995019,0.00004167099,0.00004448819,0.000091823684,0.00021232905,0.00010781332],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99975735,0.0000534184,0.000039849045,0.00012204331,0.0000072714265,0.000020038751],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00014594878,0.000060568666,0.00005867419,0.000034180022,0.00015560172,0.00004152411,0.00012623284,0.00013835423,0.015996771],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000013566774,0.00003548818,0.00004409117,0.00006440697,0.00008760715,0.0000071431255,0.000008273876,0.00007821552,0.0008532045],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[3.282893e-7,0.0000057710795,0.0000048878255,4.912699e-7,0.000002232832,2.812377e-7,0.00016813538,3.982675e-8,3.395623e-7,0.1476249,0.84485406,0.007338537],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020724405,0.00000586957,0.000051559502,0.000014575879,0.0000037056095,2.0511056e-8,0.000059354847,7.827578e-7,0.000001439537,0.00024749414,0.9995397,0.000054783144],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03979313,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07193784,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15468563,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000022335837,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000038436403,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999247},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4248816294","doi":"10.1163/2210-7975_hrd-0126-0019","title":"canadian-lawyer-vol32-issue-10-oct-2008-54-pp","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"dataset","venue":"Human Rights Documents online","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.020057939572797546,"score_gpt":0.3441452823363915,"score_spread":0.32408734276359397,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4248816294","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"dataset","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"dataset","genre_consensus":"dataset","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00070455146,0.0003498978,7.137165e-7,0.0022780648,0.0023485888,0.00069921504,0.9731838,0.00013437604,0.020300806],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00022658631,0.0005779715,0.000018799878,0.00044458447,0.0052528856,0.000034268884,0.78436154,0.00003688892,0.20904648],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9956914,0.00027235743,0.000729627,0.00086839905,0.0011960857,0.0012421114],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971776,0.00008009785,0.00042596436,0.001006809,0.00028483316,0.001024691],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00055652554,0.0005990213,0.00065879966,0.00047203587,0.0029008766,0.0004219879,0.0013205861,0.00082465133,0.09460648],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000038657443,0.00047046808,0.000244659,0.0002698097,0.0004065109,0.0005160953,0.00013680068,0.000528818,0.0043919524],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010754285,0.00017892309,0.00000950956,0.000023016388,0.000106343396,0.00009552836,0.0002512557,1.0059978e-7,0.0000019352894,0.0015972998,0.99697,0.0007553371],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00065506296,0.00010576224,0.00008002757,0.00022270721,0.00013937987,0.0000023848286,0.000030805037,3.3311852e-7,0.0000033726938,0.002548602,0.9955322,0.0006793499],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8237099,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9760691,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18882225,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013506874,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00086306507,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997747},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4251398286","doi":"10.4324/9781843145790-19","title":"Canadian Pacific Hotels Ltd v Bank of Montreal [1987] 1S.C.R. 71","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Geography","score_opus":0.019206397705546243,"score_gpt":0.2491591532684103,"score_spread":0.22995275556286404,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4251398286","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0001311326,0.00078251737,0.0000075825305,0.0015372449,0.0006316941,0.0002621818,0.00009604528,0.00005458701,0.99649704],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.15733843,0.0011146184,0.000029963056,0.00009248365,0.00082345674,0.0000032206622,0.000030188756,0.000027600398,0.84054005],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985181,0.000028396662,0.0003026641,0.0002387766,0.00045306204,0.0004589755],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987985,0.000060813014,0.00017125286,0.00028155203,0.00016120188,0.0005267178],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00041568532,0.00021367132,0.00033689337,0.00021560659,0.00030541606,0.000047887523,0.00024132006,0.0005613385,0.013983205],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000016299435,0.0002082507,0.00019760015,0.000042892763,0.00023133747,0.00012856981,0.00002417956,0.00022338679,0.00030823494],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008843492,0.000014711885,0.00042059514,0.000018161889,0.000088372915,0.0000107961905,0.008155352,2.743251e-7,0.0000108387385,0.8440547,0.023927959,0.12328942],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007808122,0.000023646853,0.0007956049,0.000035811194,0.000054130433,8.5132e-7,0.00034839593,9.240351e-7,0.00000795807,0.0052787857,0.9931385,0.00023734568],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8665292,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9548406,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9692105,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00033795284,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007412355,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98691815},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4252107597","doi":"10.1017/s0142716420000739","title":"Editors’ Note","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Applied Psycholinguistics","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung","keywords":"Psychology; Content (measure theory); Action (physics); Mathematics; Physics","score_opus":0.03746741469687732,"score_gpt":0.3445947365422463,"score_spread":0.307127321845369,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4252107597","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0014620175,0.00002392679,0.0061411485,0.0059801266,0.0054435674,0.00017556858,0.0000071086497,0.00025132048,0.98051524],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9541759,0.000045829955,0.0014245228,0.0032104957,0.04083138,0.0000070911074,0.000005296856,0.000014214711,0.00028527618],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991257,0.00001670643,0.00014656782,0.0001920153,0.00029827267,0.00022069205],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99946946,0.000058232836,0.00005433554,0.00011435385,0.000077558114,0.00022606832],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00017334991,0.00007801451,0.00009729922,0.000018205168,0.00030530742,0.000061086794,0.00017835198,0.00009563613,0.0002572313],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00026465207,0.000086168104,0.000037577745,0.00020193633,0.00010351572,0.000014492437,0.000017940894,0.00014790111,0.0003855402],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007364256,0.000072723,0.00024415198,0.00001489473,0.000020720201,0.0000100430925,0.06722603,0.00001818394,0.00053944817,0.68746495,0.20957972,0.034735467],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018420654,0.000014021777,0.00016591832,0.0000022634963,0.000011312618,7.753182e-8,0.00040308782,0.00004279856,0.000035962068,0.002575884,0.99645597,0.000108526234],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00012753862,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000022344795,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9802299,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000023162063,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000060690494,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4955468},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4252336247","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511609855","title":"The Confluence of Public and Private International Law","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":80,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Private law; Municipal law; Public law; Law; Political science; Comparative law; Conflict of laws; International law; Public international law; Jurisdiction; Commercial law; Subsidiarity; Economics; European union","score_opus":0.025802495847276206,"score_gpt":0.24330271694890804,"score_spread":0.21750022110163184,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4252336247","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00039739726,0.00016101162,0.00004177314,0.0003229027,0.00019437463,0.00019548606,0.000036988164,0.000040039136,0.99861],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0077214134,0.0007895786,0.000014036403,0.00007169303,0.0001468625,2.6309317e-7,0.00000971319,0.0000058634014,0.99124056],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990965,0.000098301694,0.000120047,0.0001869498,0.00032604314,0.00017214676],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99917215,0.00012723841,0.00020166906,0.00018228819,0.00021744546,0.0000991892],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00033506108,0.00010654721,0.00014327593,0.00005015077,0.0006040661,0.00011402197,0.00051441183,0.00016979562,0.0000018916479],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002837912,0.00010383833,0.000070667316,0.000010339982,0.0011156516,0.00012259261,0.00015040043,0.00018857203,9.256195e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001407103,0.0000042399215,0.00000683766,0.000006151478,0.000041404466,0.0000075852904,0.0002949508,7.49702e-8,0.000007840034,0.9843819,0.009493666,0.0057412414],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017115583,0.0000186064,0.00012729048,0.000039837516,0.000032282085,9.858276e-7,0.00011126112,0.000005657635,0.000020276524,0.00010106872,0.9992689,0.000102714104],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000846385,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00012801246,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9897752,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015128421,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000240013,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.46460494},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4252510352","doi":"10.1017/s0069005800009814","title":"<i>Index of Cases / Index de la jurisprudence</i>","year":2009,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Yearbook of international Law/Annuaire canadien de droit international","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Index (typography); Jurisprudence; Content (measure theory); Information retrieval; Computer science; Political science; World Wide Web; Law; Mathematics","score_opus":0.007362477811250207,"score_gpt":0.26752533271683065,"score_spread":0.26016285490558044,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4252510352","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16166575,0.00085996784,0.00029616032,0.01812089,0.0029841266,0.00024276876,0.0011947476,0.000031201544,0.8146044],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96354777,0.00037273322,0.00022737609,0.0023573516,0.0011729115,0.000011231999,0.00006111375,0.000027165632,0.032222334],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99711835,0.00017521738,0.00069297163,0.00039523875,0.0009034523,0.0007147555],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99720424,0.00029839028,0.00042225007,0.00025724556,0.0008977598,0.00092008116],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00093011267,0.00026934038,0.00034700515,0.0005365903,0.00019272049,0.00012541591,0.0012041135,0.00044509204,0.002027809],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00041442786,0.00037312214,0.00028111695,0.00030290676,0.0011347948,0.00053280115,0.000043575037,0.00042475812,0.000024256327],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000070263995,0.00012589122,0.020526752,0.000019186462,0.00025975594,0.00055707706,0.0026786122,0.00042475466,0.00008692626,0.95262456,0.009855304,0.012770916],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006221343,0.00017893192,0.04192931,0.00049516105,0.000058785943,0.00041518846,0.0006560775,0.0019840293,0.00027588065,0.029195957,0.9237832,0.00040538353],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7223203,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7479397,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9234286,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004583266,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0039903237,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998721},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4252742130","doi":"10.1093/ww/9780199540884.013.u228540","title":"Macdougall, Gordon Walters, (died 1947), KC; late Professor of Private International Law, McGill University","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"reference-entry","venue":"Who Was Who","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Art history; Art; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.030152947925898167,"score_gpt":0.3014830357229402,"score_spread":0.27133008779704204,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4252742130","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018011468,0.00034225467,0.000041283307,0.0030112658,0.0035128675,0.0005807442,0.00087333925,0.00013834404,0.97348845],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.035971414,0.04955394,0.00019575529,0.0004071361,0.0017360714,0.0000040247783,0.0004344475,0.000057851285,0.91163933],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99745893,0.00021106878,0.00041115013,0.00048020462,0.00094004057,0.0004986309],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985228,0.00012274156,0.0005255018,0.00030708328,0.00032872564,0.0001931132],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000677331,0.00028856043,0.00052584865,0.0002601,0.0005766457,0.000042444175,0.0008296646,0.0006460966,0.0005613569],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000059422404,0.00030544077,0.00023507298,0.00032602326,0.00033673074,0.0003070257,0.00027309966,0.0005671492,0.00004544019],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006405587,0.0004350088,0.0025343199,0.00062930735,0.0009066025,0.00014685569,0.01077948,0.00001001561,0.000033734126,0.7387179,0.1320598,0.11310642],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004928756,0.000052018207,0.0015071047,0.00061719934,0.00008096993,6.5609703e-7,0.00041398653,0.000015631531,0.000049421244,0.0006449412,0.9958128,0.00031243105],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011073733,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016544282,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86375296,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006827889,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00032669868,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999398},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4252847594","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3757118","title":"Global Legal Institutions","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Political science","score_opus":0.026613358026094915,"score_gpt":0.31833027415627396,"score_spread":0.291716916130179,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4252847594","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.27184647,0.0027341517,0.05013026,0.15939404,0.0012837544,0.00025623353,0.0000099034705,0.0002845649,0.5140606],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99529594,0.0018409148,0.000027598186,0.0006813182,0.0013527594,0.0000010648258,9.236605e-7,0.0000033293607,0.0007961573],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982882,0.00007036658,0.00012799732,0.00009940427,0.0002741252,0.0011399052],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996566,0.000008355613,0.000054886656,0.00004140602,0.000060901188,0.00017780956],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006403864,0.00005945395,0.00007507369,0.000016938295,0.00083712646,0.000114746465,0.00019316748,0.000051849678,0.00010097572],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009855045,0.00005776726,0.00008221667,0.00029594492,0.00009855117,0.0003086862,0.000017103206,0.00057324744,0.000065365544],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012396296,0.000013202956,0.0013667499,4.1860648e-7,0.000023700002,0.0000029063594,0.00076943863,0.000019003777,0.000008279333,0.98065794,0.0004219528,0.016704034],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025614654,0.00011968758,0.00081131223,0.0000029339794,0.00001783593,0.00004511166,0.0040151286,0.000021422577,0.0000017385421,0.047732577,0.94689023,0.00008588386],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017298611,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019483523,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9464683,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00083776197,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0057823644,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998539},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4253029584","doi":"10.1016/s0969-4765(04)00087-6","title":"Canadian airports issue biometric ID cards","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biometric Technology Today","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Biometrics; Smart card; Computer security; Identification (biology); Airport security; Business; Engineering; Internet privacy; Telecommunications; Computer science","score_opus":0.010827390170647566,"score_gpt":0.2818114486733163,"score_spread":0.27098405850266877,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4253029584","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.60090345,0.013270017,0.0010359728,0.13783303,0.0070939693,0.001511618,0.00014378651,0.003100073,0.2351081],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99532175,0.00055560993,0.0006038318,0.00026380052,0.0003223791,0.000028245064,0.000012595659,0.000019556084,0.0028722342],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99798083,0.00003458794,0.00028489984,0.0004167845,0.0004638301,0.0008190757],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99886787,0.000044280718,0.00011699762,0.00041122577,0.00017388232,0.00038573143],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":["bibliometrics"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007082813,0.00017522399,0.0002555329,0.017196797,0.00079512666,0.000074880394,0.00055971637,0.0007300076,0.0006030969],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006575573,0.00018217578,0.0000853284,0.037024938,0.00046273155,0.00016078148,0.00006904582,0.00023906093,0.0005451039],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000071017594,0.0002194106,0.04605175,0.000015154665,0.00013031079,0.00025885893,0.0017506235,0.0000042308207,0.00076461834,0.09631261,0.018370599,0.8361147],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030696188,0.00011004282,0.009206824,0.000008741365,0.000022261871,0.000012223538,0.00066822016,5.942096e-7,0.0007974539,0.0026774765,0.9859567,0.00023244887],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4705046,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14338149,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96758616,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001363998,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001054152,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99394244},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4253581861","doi":"10.3917/riges.352.0079","title":"Introduction","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gestion","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Environmental science","score_opus":0.010748148604501158,"score_gpt":0.2786141182437563,"score_spread":0.26786596963925513,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4253581861","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7600489,0.000010819541,0.001036294,0.16716745,0.005001923,0.000110837515,5.704966e-7,0.0002260014,0.06639717],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9898853,0.000018217079,0.00023027966,0.000039865434,0.0039035368,0.000003377245,0.0000031804504,0.000002137418,0.005914127],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996817,0.00002393075,0.000042385564,0.00007106478,0.00010508468,0.00007579394],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99983114,0.000011896545,0.00001790986,0.00006194987,0.000043344793,0.000033766373],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00033769297,0.000021401775,0.000022515846,0.000024255329,0.00023501736,0.00003017335,0.000032389464,0.00006144977,0.000951765],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014411296,0.00002221131,0.000013293983,0.00007830215,0.00005155148,0.00012365312,0.0000038719363,0.00010475545,0.00015831327],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008511501,0.000031013024,0.0027664602,0.0000015604676,0.0000025973238,4.6529897e-7,0.004062062,0.0000042909473,0.029430822,0.6101205,0.0182867,0.33528507],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000033815515,0.000007302649,0.027502319,6.7779064e-7,0.0000024435092,6.839859e-7,0.00010471789,0.000014250779,0.00023122522,0.0013077848,0.97076577,0.000029009487],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006796772,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017495833,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95247906,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000014529802,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002273036,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999615},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4253926598","doi":"10.4135/9781412952637.n73","title":"Canadian Law and Society Association (Association Canadienne Droit Et Société)","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"reference-entry","venue":"","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Association (psychology); Political science; Library science; Law; Sociology; Philosophy; Computer science; Epistemology","score_opus":0.01484463295430814,"score_gpt":0.2842073199251827,"score_spread":0.26936268697087457,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4253926598","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0017019301,0.00045587085,0.000022286567,0.007244587,0.002623236,0.0003676169,0.0002977317,0.00012674164,0.98716],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.032953046,0.040593594,0.00011454367,0.0077904454,0.0022775205,0.000021225818,0.0005402877,0.00004531125,0.915664],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967244,0.0002106821,0.00039094075,0.0004555184,0.00086775474,0.0013506958],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975541,0.000488956,0.0005086983,0.00015853152,0.00046295047,0.0008267425],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004205701,0.00027411905,0.00043087348,0.00014045603,0.0013894485,0.00040846656,0.00020674025,0.0018458549,0.0013505073],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00033735365,0.0003157712,0.00023611404,0.00030990838,0.00006993986,0.0003112698,0.000038422324,0.0008138338,0.000046915524],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000026893163,0.000023636128,0.004424098,0.00004104339,0.0002965759,0.0000036817078,0.014804141,2.864127e-7,2.9122836e-7,0.34366584,0.61272955,0.024008194],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022719268,0.000019696436,0.0030160449,0.000057454326,0.00011744879,3.758077e-7,0.0039266427,0.000010830659,7.5757794e-7,0.0015761453,0.9906868,0.00036066308],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9904046,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9994566,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.37795722,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.024403933,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033284265,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999294},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4254404409","doi":"10.1139/gen-2020-0185","title":"Note of appreciation","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Genome","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Biology; Evolutionary biology; Genetics","score_opus":0.02979618219306887,"score_gpt":0.29122000360686073,"score_spread":0.26142382141379183,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4254404409","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5388097,0.00027477744,0.006684906,0.02345651,0.00035465078,0.00026221364,0.000013442184,0.0001178293,0.43002596],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99902886,0.00003888507,0.0001615817,0.00021119713,0.00030570978,9.115304e-7,0.0000018308755,0.0000016755762,0.0002493352],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99971163,0.000018521507,0.00005967841,0.00004812956,0.00010535395,0.000056679346],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998643,0.000011111396,0.00003214426,0.000028758173,0.000024732442,0.000038952105],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00009955472,0.000017080505,0.000039756684,0.0000091007705,0.000059823273,0.000006933105,0.00005031818,0.000022631046,0.00023236718],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003372251,0.000018098854,0.000020377487,0.000098089986,0.000023855817,0.000041370968,0.000008455698,0.000020596815,0.000043511478],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007180833,0.000082380604,0.006470149,0.000055204982,0.000038699643,0.0000029136374,0.52827185,0.00022602922,0.17782542,0.12641457,0.0008028967,0.15973811],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000063295745,0.000022578166,0.013877906,9.510207e-7,0.0000036285487,1.8884265e-8,0.00041572005,0.000029733197,0.00018577198,0.00025750764,0.9851128,0.000030104195],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00022734825,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000069409645,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9843099,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000012428415,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000029678607,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25442576},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4254986221","doi":"10.4095/301344","title":"Families with Children Living at Home, 1996 - Common-law couples with no children living at home","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"report","venue":"","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Gerontology; Developmental psychology; Medicine","score_opus":0.01340842490495662,"score_gpt":0.2640564991664639,"score_spread":0.25064807426150726,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4254986221","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.67848855,0.0010512699,0.0000067854585,0.00015143065,0.00080945785,0.000932495,0.00013340102,0.0005047299,0.31792185],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90815675,0.009637594,0.0002838386,0.00019027408,0.0031001642,0.00007980424,0.00035887057,0.00019308567,0.07799962],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9939971,0.00017750627,0.00072084507,0.0011692707,0.0027973184,0.0011379375],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99646443,0.0006177573,0.000849583,0.0009461692,0.0006422546,0.00047982205],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016645627,0.00085888297,0.0012326703,0.00027284498,0.0031319608,0.0005554773,0.0008655094,0.0009958611,0.0025402743],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011385307,0.00064382044,0.0002848454,0.00045459342,0.0014843624,0.0005063756,0.0006801705,0.0011210514,0.00018648864],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041183448,0.00016179099,0.9845398,0.00006494898,0.0005271544,0.000015561596,0.007719772,0.00000668116,0.000018243261,0.00042804913,0.0037984336,0.0026783638],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026755934,0.00028337812,0.7107026,0.0010217536,0.000307104,0.00017517692,0.000372534,0.0000063554767,0.000008787516,0.00000595323,0.28563806,0.0012107132],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.20316426,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5530833,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.34991905,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00089740293,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011886697,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996013},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4255626685","doi":"10.5040/9781474200790.ch-008","title":"Prince Albert v Strange (1849)","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Hart Publishing eBooks","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"History","score_opus":0.03566224685223425,"score_gpt":0.2669125854209219,"score_spread":0.23125033856868765,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4255626685","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000684887,0.0000908875,0.00011181915,0.0028176547,0.0014250058,0.0003524899,0.000026061192,0.00034040847,0.9947672],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.008489785,0.00004344059,0.000094127194,0.00089047285,0.0032017876,0.000016144686,0.000038145048,0.00007053658,0.98715556],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99760914,0.000066902234,0.00037561904,0.00052074576,0.0009475452,0.00048004446],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99848276,0.00016754842,0.00030688295,0.00047672392,0.0002583726,0.00030768025],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012965361,0.00030645123,0.00037004385,0.00017688886,0.00069309433,0.0024921412,0.0007097419,0.0007542449,0.001565295],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019011463,0.00032319187,0.00023793707,0.000020113444,0.00031836054,0.00062796497,0.00013546694,0.0007801565,0.00029519387],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000065746963,0.000004246168,0.000016459337,0.00002233192,0.000036087382,0.0000079197,0.0035951848,1.3450999e-7,0.000009766124,0.86970747,0.05241959,0.07417426],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015116464,0.000024770588,0.00004666855,0.00016520194,0.00004117831,0.0000018277063,0.000046439356,0.0000022883407,0.000005440976,0.008947932,0.99020183,0.00036524414],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028412943,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0108369505,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9377822,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018417263,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003318522,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99992204},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4255841119","doi":"10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195312898.001.0001","title":"The Law Market","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Business; Earnings; Asset (computer security); Control (management); Economics; Political science; Finance","score_opus":0.01771173041880927,"score_gpt":0.23328583747617118,"score_spread":0.2155741070573619,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4255841119","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000037690331,0.000104085186,0.0000137291845,0.00027122477,0.00025320513,0.0002899637,0.00001670307,0.00012764866,0.99891967],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00008880729,0.0011848779,0.000017287568,0.00013517337,0.00039759846,3.843758e-7,0.000006447108,0.00001130663,0.9981581],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99883276,0.00015038722,0.000101479214,0.00022437223,0.0003842987,0.0003066811],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99916935,0.00016610064,0.00014013729,0.0003006201,0.00009897977,0.00012483675],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003607835,0.00015459568,0.00016148994,0.00003570517,0.0020694837,0.00015459397,0.0006247185,0.00032684449,0.000058148198],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000088701645,0.00014490334,0.00016539461,0.000011266043,0.00058149436,0.000084966625,0.00011179567,0.00032134846,0.0000011908465],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036503603,0.000003803267,3.455837e-7,0.0000036894046,0.000027972448,0.000016428605,0.00080191426,1.3065826e-7,1.2939222e-7,0.82463247,0.15623066,0.018245934],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014699095,0.00002619576,0.000008430434,0.000034305333,0.00006667937,4.866383e-7,0.0002177556,0.0000031895759,0.0000012280894,0.0024350644,0.9968878,0.00017187258],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012163176,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003913621,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8406571,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003162914,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00035110614,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99922967},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4256143135","doi":"10.22215/etd/2007-07532","title":"Justifying &amp; mitigating the semantic indeterminacy in charter jurisprudence: an exploration of legal validity, moral considerations &amp; hermeneutics","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University; Canadian Heritage","funders":"","keywords":"Indeterminacy (philosophy); Charter; Hermeneutics; Jurisprudence; Philosophy; Epistemology; Sociology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.20039903408272283,"score_gpt":0.4394917003188688,"score_spread":0.23909266623614597,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4256143135","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.959762,0.000036489226,0.0003137701,0.0009773531,0.0011071992,0.0007033153,0.000009456932,0.00007504644,0.03701542],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99144316,0.00013882261,0.000710727,0.0001541185,0.0005249378,0.000048051043,0.0003528935,0.000028132547,0.0065991483],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972255,0.00039399118,0.0008078726,0.00036503276,0.00081341807,0.00039414453],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983499,0.0003305174,0.00048777988,0.00033452953,0.00039481308,0.00010248292],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018012879,0.00024785008,0.00034059575,0.0002877049,0.0008912713,0.0003464234,0.00023446666,0.00041925043,0.00037069578],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00030169872,0.00022361988,0.00012048911,0.00041007416,0.00020547815,0.001518714,0.000024946936,0.0005166189,0.00001959319],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012047266,0.0006424169,0.012073614,0.0005476573,0.0000890049,0.000029215093,0.7999169,0.00035553655,0.0067630596,0.15771604,0.0011194878,0.02062656],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0032818783,0.000674899,0.12831919,0.0036979003,0.0014255513,0.000040210136,0.6031629,0.0026116108,0.011009822,0.123643,0.11720501,0.0049280133],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008028959,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.42214003,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.41411108,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013016762,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005375793,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99857664},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4281905339","doi":"10.52975/llt.2022v89.002","title":"Editors’ Note / Note de la rédaction","year":2022,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Labour / Le Travail","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan; Mount Royal University","funders":"","keywords":"Redaction; Philosophy; Theology","score_opus":0.011660390845767135,"score_gpt":0.2850344602586965,"score_spread":0.27337406941292935,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4281905339","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7322626,0.006096937,0.0030937258,0.067576356,0.058970843,0.00054153026,0.00029195088,0.00045913958,0.13070692],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8033293,0.000826324,0.00024146549,0.0008875744,0.014123355,0.000044211916,0.000012372898,0.00003785934,0.18049756],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970905,0.0011068144,0.0002622598,0.0003336831,0.000646904,0.00055981404],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99912834,0.00023342298,0.00015579328,0.00021017593,0.00006819169,0.00020404735],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017159285,0.00017650849,0.00019875423,0.00007626967,0.0017476148,0.00015746595,0.00029259856,0.00023261673,0.0044417777],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000062087776,0.00022755856,0.00015817156,0.0006088595,0.00042935563,0.00031087376,0.0000864877,0.0007246225,0.0001975906],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015657504,0.0010679114,0.0019738553,0.000095002164,0.00009254519,0.00011957909,0.15803488,0.0012376435,0.005903395,0.16127813,0.14113994,0.52890056],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00048953627,0.00013175183,0.01428484,0.000013900837,0.000039690218,0.000018463285,0.0025799524,0.0003956912,0.00020713812,0.0021825382,0.9794085,0.0002479854],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.041248813,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0020241477,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8382686,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00090139057,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007741698,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99955195},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4286386909","doi":"","title":"The Elgar Companion to the Hague Conference on Private International Law","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Conflict of laws; Law; Political science; Law and economics; History; Sociology","score_opus":0.02297782393661018,"score_gpt":0.27295236065461453,"score_spread":0.24997453671800435,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4286386909","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04388172,0.00014712772,0.009056882,0.3140524,0.0006547254,0.0002512991,0.00001317867,0.00010441814,0.63183826],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97110945,0.00045032118,0.00092906476,0.0009296283,0.000075351316,0.000024005614,0.000033094708,0.000009172161,0.026439903],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961524,0.0026883124,0.00019910114,0.0002551348,0.00048388066,0.00022117731],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968379,0.0010273491,0.00011024228,0.00069446175,0.0012219007,0.00010815093],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038556822,0.000091818976,0.00008617887,0.000025232417,0.0017798435,0.00067863753,0.0008449896,0.00005472861,0.00023384261],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009532471,0.000067792294,0.00007114787,0.00028654875,0.00027736198,0.0001091388,0.00023070874,0.00018574657,0.00012491173],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000049308105,0.0000713514,0.00033289238,0.0000010926565,0.000012937333,9.654713e-7,0.011048781,0.0000066571083,0.0005294024,0.96457994,0.0012657612,0.022145309],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014319926,3.1258068e-7,0.0046879635,0.000115709605,0.000005844307,0.0000014402814,0.0008841962,0.0008363212,0.0058810073,0.004159238,0.98318976,0.00009498791],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019419527,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.035760175,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.981924,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008071563,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012905801,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995197},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4292002106","doi":"","title":"Les juristes face au dogme de la wertfreiheit, in La neutralité et le droit, Rencontres juridiques Montpellier-Sherbrooke, 25-26 octobre 2012, Les Editions Revue de Droit de l’Université de Sherbrooke, 2013, pp. 7 à 18.","year":2013,"lang":"fr","type":"preprint","venue":"HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Art","score_opus":0.015774421033436823,"score_gpt":0.2480858019564281,"score_spread":0.23231138092299128,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4292002106","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.40096036,0.013424126,0.03499887,0.054941237,0.0003901653,0.0011601344,0.0002570513,0.0006260894,0.49324197],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8165791,0.04671075,0.014673245,0.00021598238,0.00029928566,0.00022017045,0.00031692488,0.00014723341,0.1208373],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9833976,0.012678914,0.00094397867,0.001130017,0.0005457236,0.001303785],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9920161,0.0040337266,0.00079556677,0.0015243863,0.00092559727,0.0007046685],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010187069,0.0006714221,0.0007700798,0.00030290196,0.001658533,0.000837104,0.001995637,0.0013455051,0.0009014996],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008678219,0.00087229017,0.0005487504,0.00063191494,0.0015506096,0.00079576165,0.0009852687,0.0016782961,0.00008078476],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005862366,0.0016881707,0.034654625,0.00050173874,0.00020952312,0.000055578228,0.0854286,0.0015182185,0.0041204775,0.8060007,0.03152641,0.03423729],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012050695,0.00000529439,0.16147605,0.0044351975,0.00020078258,0.000068140376,0.0026349293,0.008059983,0.0061473395,0.046667684,0.7679301,0.001169435],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.44460186,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4881221,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7593331,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002933226,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018772422,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99995095},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4292012736","doi":"","title":"Due process--right to medical access--Supreme Court of Canada holds that ban on private health insurance violates Quebec charter of human rights and freedoms--Chaoulli v. Quebec (Attorney General), 2005 S.C.C. 35, 29272, [2005] S.C.J. No. 33 QUICKLAW (June 9, 2005).","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PubMed","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Political science; Charter; Human rights; Health insurance; Health care","score_opus":0.017744551504262348,"score_gpt":0.2785862839930347,"score_spread":0.26084173248877235,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4292012736","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9501575,0.0005572016,0.000021552636,0.04016753,0.0009299496,0.0018270327,0.00017940013,0.00009148911,0.0060683265],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9801815,0.0002671549,0.000048420814,0.001874833,0.0013716955,0.00034798478,0.000034694855,0.00003936974,0.015834345],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9946323,0.00028513116,0.0010044184,0.0007134121,0.0018659254,0.0014988045],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968843,0.0001316675,0.0006475971,0.00047990066,0.0002397839,0.0016167599],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019061258,0.0004171097,0.00086540444,0.00024412964,0.00080579205,0.00014211454,0.00083724293,0.00030674916,0.0006356949],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013958207,0.00036152423,0.00011225615,0.0003264356,0.0005837906,0.0007451784,0.000111369336,0.00035907244,0.0000070785413],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0015305029,0.003499074,0.10804231,0.0014694607,0.0010048138,0.00012653698,0.030950828,0.00050972594,0.0011270538,0.052571755,0.70400584,0.095162086],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011791326,0.000064600164,0.25178063,0.00019530735,0.000018656016,0.0000030001452,0.000075001444,0.00008259047,0.002332031,0.00017390093,0.74363923,0.00045592745],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.91690034,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9980088,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14373831,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007908599,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001611905,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99988365},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4294307015","doi":"10.1093/he/9780198860907.003.0009","title":"9. Exemption clauses","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Notice; Legislature; Law; Legislative intent; Political science; Freedom of contract; Law and economics; Interpretation (philosophy); Exclusion clause; Common law; Economics; Business; Contract management","score_opus":0.03947923908794791,"score_gpt":0.24768638792239284,"score_spread":0.2082071488344449,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4294307015","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00008191643,0.000058016358,0.00003120324,0.000100569414,0.00042414526,0.00027706524,0.00006659515,0.00019363928,0.99876684],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0009711512,0.0015566953,0.000027889117,0.000050066472,0.00026312977,8.127773e-7,0.0000310177,0.0000215671,0.99707764],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99888664,0.000060427374,0.00010718186,0.00028827728,0.00044267724,0.0002147786],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993742,0.00004753422,0.00016355173,0.0002282199,0.000070197704,0.0001162821],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00017583431,0.00016301591,0.00018624305,0.00013038484,0.0010782734,0.000050828887,0.00035377534,0.00026329554,0.0017179318],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000049994383,0.00021729016,0.00016530578,0.000008119931,0.00022999462,0.00013686651,0.00021767383,0.00035171275,0.0000023054151],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000040253544,0.0000057694174,0.000004650768,0.000008857247,0.000040430972,0.00003492409,0.0018144936,0.0000015017532,0.000002352277,0.9831107,0.0029118466,0.012024168],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017526945,0.000039485945,0.000009758747,0.000023246204,0.00009499433,7.842235e-7,0.00029692682,0.000001888575,0.0000026425525,0.0009861239,0.9981372,0.00023170449],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016445979,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00072199764,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9952253,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00036159,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016618334,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991946},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4295714057","doi":"10.54648/erpl2007036","title":"Towards a European <i>Ius</i> Commune – What Lessons can We Learn from Quebec’s Mixed Legal System?","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Review of Private Law/Revue européenne de droit privé/Europäische Zeitschrift für Privatrecht","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Context (archaeology); European union; Member states; Common law; Law; Jurisdiction; Derecho; Geography; Philosophy; Business","score_opus":0.024968081916264998,"score_gpt":0.2920405933714443,"score_spread":0.2670725114551793,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4295714057","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.040104803,0.081924334,0.006654243,0.030284721,0.0055295303,0.0033208714,0.00027046842,0.0022996133,0.8296114],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7508335,0.21585555,0.008616154,0.008098951,0.0051340126,0.000036642152,0.00064012007,0.0010511632,0.009733899],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98078567,0.009800739,0.0035203984,0.0018885634,0.0016626451,0.0023419994],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9912642,0.00081505993,0.0022809028,0.0033093088,0.001005392,0.0013251171],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"category_scores_codex":[0.017244186,0.0012865218,0.002113946,0.00039995552,0.0014011973,0.0009147098,0.0045160577,0.0002975568,0.0004489311],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023010601,0.001387197,0.0011352793,0.0019228924,0.001243773,0.0016035539,0.001929061,0.002186227,0.0010955249],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019427873,0.0007465874,0.00034117734,0.0061651445,0.00055530696,0.0022250519,0.009905983,0.00001873076,0.0063672205,0.6885138,0.006004857,0.27896187],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012853608,0.00022472678,0.004478034,0.019920612,0.0005127606,0.00007709056,0.0017138207,0.000021654028,0.0014436613,0.000120463206,0.96883696,0.0013648274],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007573302,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005248065,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96283215,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00030293944,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005220072,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999887},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4296022918","doi":"10.5937/zrpfns55-34676","title":"Child's habitual residence in the jurisprudence of the Court of Justice of the European Union","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Zbornik radova Pravnog fakulteta Novi Sad","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Jurisdiction; Residence; Interpretation (philosophy); Convention; Economic Justice; Political science; European union; Jurisprudence; International law; Enforcement; Sociology; Business","score_opus":0.021693685417922336,"score_gpt":0.2964419690910474,"score_spread":0.2747482836731251,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4296022918","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.79592943,0.0019080462,0.00059695315,0.03675761,0.0016175364,0.0009613757,0.000099039324,0.000036916164,0.16209309],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99839556,0.000443695,0.00016291148,0.0002601759,0.00020782666,0.0000035275089,0.0000024679507,0.000013245224,0.00051057205],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99453497,0.0032131395,0.00060015667,0.00028225497,0.0010851319,0.0002843455],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975452,0.0006464784,0.00055082457,0.0008431674,0.00037172236,0.000042613763],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0043919827,0.00015004781,0.0002624528,0.000051129427,0.00047543616,0.00004046805,0.0013491426,0.000094103605,0.000053159354],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017946801,0.00008873843,0.00018953312,0.0012488797,0.0009515375,0.00017619062,0.0002687502,0.00040876627,0.000005591764],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023707382,0.0025260674,0.15764728,0.0009771745,0.00028407213,0.000093324175,0.32203934,0.0017945542,0.065058686,0.34396252,0.012326972,0.09305295],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00065275305,0.00007917149,0.8630903,0.00074003503,0.00022200223,0.000015089133,0.016580304,0.000060115082,0.008382426,0.0006177887,0.10934377,0.00021624561],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0025558488,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005457334,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.705443,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000430726,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00040792083,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38636962},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4296613264","doi":"10.1093/ajcl/avac016","title":"Multicultural Populations and Mixed Legal Systems in the United States: Louisiana and Puerto Rico","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The American Journal of Comparative Law","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Multiculturalism; Political science; Geography; Law","score_opus":0.056486827888494,"score_gpt":0.34960018607404464,"score_spread":0.2931133581855506,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4296613264","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99160016,0.00042128982,0.000032798638,0.0068197628,0.00012191823,0.00014609705,0.0000061072374,0.000004260431,0.00084763207],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993563,0.0000630164,0.000028745042,0.0004125468,0.00007925814,0.000005788727,0.0000024429787,0.000002257577,0.000049628226],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.998028,0.0012717837,0.00021803933,0.000058098278,0.0003051341,0.00011897034],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992018,0.00029492742,0.00030808616,0.00005981916,0.00008753499,0.000047878613],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008255196,0.0000622326,0.00019136317,0.00006005207,0.0008500566,0.00013187944,0.0001749712,0.0000057998036,0.000008133077],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000073873543,0.00003445047,0.000028666738,0.0004720041,0.0006489515,0.00013830952,0.00002999798,0.00022504972,3.2816448e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00040303596,0.00016643081,0.0042189294,0.0000041559283,0.000111590416,0.00003881074,0.51439786,0.013275786,0.00012424451,0.46328953,0.00262198,0.0013476429],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00052604114,0.0005782577,0.052091703,0.000017301774,0.000045858356,0.000108980545,0.6809156,0.0031856324,0.0000025063778,0.0015180313,0.2608931,0.000117001284],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018789098,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029527724,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4617715,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000050986557,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000027414397,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98774487},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4297510182","doi":"10.1017/9781009063814.001","title":"Conventions","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.020294389527565845,"score_gpt":0.3256436250552786,"score_spread":0.30534923552771276,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4297510182","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[5.549092e-7,0.00017100103,0.000030903087,0.0010047414,0.000634788,0.00009787068,0.000009254748,0.00029361175,0.99775726],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00006995865,0.0002829206,0.00003817216,0.00013569604,0.00042367305,0.000013718782,0.00001592384,0.000053109226,0.9989668],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99961615,0.000039434573,0.00003664339,0.000074330725,0.00015726114,0.00007616975],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99985206,0.000007807355,0.00003097386,0.000073720854,0.0000044500457,0.00003100851],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00009925234,0.000033550994,0.0000491963,0.000060346192,0.0001963939,0.00001721133,0.000079972575,0.000058832873,0.7486299],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000072769453,0.000035029065,0.000043684406,0.0000743644,0.000048364105,0.000009115492,0.00002008099,0.000056812107,0.00038253993],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[9.8508124e-8,0.000006525267,0.000037054404,8.8432057e-7,0.000005789821,5.042302e-7,0.00023770463,6.606457e-9,6.701979e-8,0.17913662,0.81878304,0.0017917247],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028625074,0.000003764568,0.00001488165,0.0000022073314,0.0000060583384,5.6316924e-8,0.0006035606,1.4888282e-7,3.5757758e-8,0.00018994657,0.9991041,0.000046606325],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01418568,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01886581,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7482474,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003283687,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000060701834,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990373},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4300945641","doi":"10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198747123.001.0001","title":"Comparative Succession Law","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Entitlement (fair division); Cohabitation; Discretion; Property (philosophy); Creditor; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Sociology; Economics; Debt; Finance","score_opus":0.06083438541908747,"score_gpt":0.2946948702974055,"score_spread":0.233860484878318,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4300945641","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00007049292,0.00007408712,0.000035340097,0.000051113653,0.0003980774,0.0003409297,0.00006214928,0.00016391175,0.9988039],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.001861313,0.0001261346,0.000041788328,0.00005212527,0.00037463073,5.793888e-7,0.000048441972,0.000013163912,0.9974818],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986191,0.00016753406,0.00011911919,0.0003002878,0.0005248955,0.00026910254],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99898773,0.0000644597,0.00019417884,0.00023154356,0.0002740048,0.00024810343],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00025774734,0.00019559535,0.0003359985,0.00007978902,0.00077761867,0.00008574193,0.0004693941,0.00042454182,0.00006622075],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000043109612,0.0002225601,0.00012617563,0.000016353702,0.0005734982,0.00018677447,0.00019208141,0.0003437036,0.0000037647203],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000062068815,0.000012379609,0.0000018646992,0.00001242857,0.00004405873,0.000024979483,0.008223122,0.0000015162926,0.0000013939875,0.9140752,0.07637209,0.0011688939],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031731537,0.00004234477,0.0000028062782,0.00008344183,0.00008627704,4.205718e-7,0.0007739417,0.0000070192455,0.000010958285,0.0014308431,0.996992,0.0002526399],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032920537,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00409523,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9206199,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005979923,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00073314225,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9075738},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4303491992","doi":"10.1017/9781800106093.002","title":"Note on the Text","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Natural language processing; Information retrieval","score_opus":0.023120843268946777,"score_gpt":0.3076589971216274,"score_spread":0.28453815385268066,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4303491992","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000027324304,0.00005152835,0.00000747973,0.012100479,0.0005148794,0.0001483034,0.000005349007,0.00014312047,0.98702615],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0005454613,0.00016898083,0.00000819227,0.0016390509,0.0007195688,0.0000141067085,0.0000026267928,0.000052232557,0.9968498],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99941015,0.00007865763,0.00003835567,0.00009686731,0.00027863643,0.00009735509],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997256,0.00007048324,0.000037650723,0.0001395468,0.0000041279372,0.000022624876],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00022799284,0.000052291012,0.000053933276,0.000036522255,0.00031333687,0.00003128055,0.0001769379,0.00007065629,0.4711323],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000249627,0.000032666427,0.000044859058,0.00008578703,0.000063588624,0.00000637699,0.00002679276,0.00012332022,0.00076859794],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[5.457619e-7,0.000005507814,0.0000051421234,4.1475533e-7,0.000003606242,4.2786976e-7,0.00072773837,3.9327393e-8,1.7844063e-7,0.19171397,0.79981005,0.007732377],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019131454,0.000010716776,0.000018501603,0.000003893001,0.000003554751,3.1765445e-8,0.0005189244,6.048066e-7,2.9994823e-7,0.00018045303,0.99919355,0.00005031153],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01053681,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013104897,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4703637,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004400777,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000053074957,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9960521},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4306933946","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198754183.003.0006","title":"Horizontality: Presuppositions and Functions","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dignity; Presupposition; Jurisprudence; Exposition (narrative); Law; Human rights; Political science; Order (exchange); Sociology; Law and economics; Epistemology; Philosophy; Art","score_opus":0.025989249903199223,"score_gpt":0.2766433838844074,"score_spread":0.25065413398120817,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4306933946","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00003063071,0.00025076573,0.000059686936,0.0032111986,0.00047819625,0.00020829942,0.0000992043,0.00013676472,0.99552524],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0028979057,0.000954459,0.00002977957,0.00015218202,0.00041099568,0.000019387391,0.00007070542,0.000014290548,0.9954503],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992589,0.000023412853,0.00012141498,0.00020359713,0.00027140384,0.00012132495],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999628,0.000055244334,0.000052008447,0.00012805134,0.00003797704,0.00009869141],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00017384999,0.00009785806,0.000115510804,0.00007395908,0.0012461259,0.00007412823,0.00006993856,0.00013199564,0.035472214],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000007632817,0.00010694487,0.00007747484,0.00002189429,0.00017028039,0.000113066206,0.0000706551,0.00020923027,0.00007177463],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002804208,0.0000066182574,0.0000061289643,0.000002572126,0.000027651995,0.0000023606133,0.0007545783,1.083994e-7,0.0000017234538,0.9686394,0.01775213,0.012803946],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000052112933,0.000051561656,0.000055297067,0.0000056898516,0.000062498184,0.0000019616882,0.00032239468,7.6902575e-7,1.9472485e-7,0.014033215,0.98529,0.0001243206],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004348524,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0043070046,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9675379,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009838297,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013793398,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9654095},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4312563132","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-14264-2_3","title":"Conflicts of Law","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Progress in IS","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Law; Conflict of laws; Choice of law; Political science; Subject-matter jurisdiction; Personal jurisdiction; Private law; Common law; Tort; International law; Original jurisdiction; Context (archaeology); Substantive law; Comparative law; Liability","score_opus":0.04773683651121564,"score_gpt":0.3368288457886477,"score_spread":0.28909200927743206,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4312563132","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0001644794,0.0030062036,3.1086253e-7,0.0010124983,0.00038042912,0.00026052515,0.000038552003,0.00003507836,0.9951019],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.21104869,0.003260125,0.00011794766,0.0006014951,0.0005611961,0.000087279506,0.000036616464,0.000063123225,0.7842235],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99885035,0.000028245411,0.00024418472,0.00019995082,0.0005103721,0.00016688449],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99947834,0.000045599925,0.00019265823,0.00017220166,0.000062120824,0.000049077273],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00036712192,0.00011041815,0.0002338317,0.000090133646,0.00016028175,0.000023481321,0.00023022328,0.00018646289,0.007936942],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000006702821,0.00012435473,0.00009496083,0.000035675923,0.0005153092,0.00006515516,0.00009053183,0.00025186545,0.000018415465],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009253326,0.000016910499,0.0004071421,0.000021620135,0.000017048511,0.00000946105,0.010696391,7.153504e-8,1.6843572e-7,0.95768225,0.00031386694,0.030825833],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011158755,0.000039638653,0.000073777686,0.00006522935,0.0000145644935,3.1896553e-7,0.00005974378,0.0000010891696,0.000008906093,0.01147436,0.98802984,0.00012095473],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015062168,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001011008,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98771596,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008867665,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008471883,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99296993},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4312926044","doi":"10.1007/978-3-030-78318-1_110","title":"Orr, Alexandra","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology","score_opus":0.03422855691000146,"score_gpt":0.2901516064137893,"score_spread":0.2559230495037878,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4312926044","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000004716764,0.00025278062,0.000010838499,0.0020009733,0.0007685027,0.00013472539,0.000010849763,0.00013645565,0.99668014],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0005174106,0.001368945,0.000024618097,0.0003785986,0.00060746184,0.0000053739427,0.000017286451,0.000017085586,0.9970632],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99912447,0.000014952283,0.00012072881,0.00017394504,0.00042580295,0.00014007634],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996462,0.000041859585,0.00006579916,0.00013821853,0.000035987705,0.000071941904],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00023793953,0.000097732765,0.00013111922,0.000059919657,0.0005559587,0.00004640414,0.00015997759,0.00014553862,0.24967836],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000009173155,0.00009981306,0.00011032196,0.000018143726,0.00011015277,0.000069546004,0.00006548841,0.00020547428,0.00036476585],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000022317417,0.0000027803594,0.0000036571062,0.000001674268,0.0000121695375,0.0000054960506,0.0009996757,1.3443119e-7,3.516319e-7,0.95284635,0.029397525,0.016727936],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004435732,0.000021141797,0.000006869916,0.0000055274204,0.000015910438,5.2081595e-7,0.00013177346,4.6220032e-7,2.9151812e-7,0.011586299,0.98805493,0.00013193225],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022296698,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002636511,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9586574,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011594258,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001574405,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.75100756},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4312947185","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-14264-2_5","title":"Comparative Legal Strategies","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Progress in IS","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Sovereignty; Mandate; Political science; Data governance; Legislature; Corporate governance; Variety (cybernetics); Realm; Legislation; Law; Law and economics; Politics; Business; Computer science; Sociology","score_opus":0.05730928409788204,"score_gpt":0.3672815565047576,"score_spread":0.3099722724068755,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4312947185","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00031084009,0.003126089,0.0000013051038,0.001308634,0.0004566706,0.00028734788,0.000029123452,0.000065044784,0.9944149],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.31081155,0.0013220113,0.00009224392,0.00015500281,0.00066746253,0.00011038624,0.00003778852,0.000030249825,0.6867733],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99885666,0.000041524716,0.00018961247,0.0002441777,0.0004689185,0.00019913085],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99960405,0.000039929102,0.00013007336,0.00012774832,0.000050245242,0.000047965976],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00024966875,0.00014215967,0.00025309756,0.000106888234,0.00032430486,0.00017276383,0.00022502121,0.00014733979,0.008615746],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000022068125,0.0001542666,0.0000815432,0.000047698933,0.00040764303,0.0002259091,0.00007682214,0.00038698423,0.000049808918],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012735443,0.000017227934,0.00020833027,0.000008678285,0.000023857547,0.000023792498,0.020854644,6.822389e-7,5.919781e-8,0.9613941,0.0020925312,0.015363372],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008661135,0.00004530143,0.00016789665,0.00003651389,0.000012161122,5.4589464e-7,0.0018998986,0.0000044813173,0.0000012189845,0.01369955,0.9838772,0.00016865418],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008783952,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025703195,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98178464,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015854479,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00030095427,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9922905},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4313857695","doi":"10.1139/cjm-2022-0255","title":"Note of appreciation","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Microbiology","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Biology; Chemistry","score_opus":0.01913677623634561,"score_gpt":0.2794322559167629,"score_spread":0.2602954796804173,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4313857695","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9828607,0.00023356124,0.00010359088,0.0050780983,0.0016423205,0.00005647349,0.000026711776,0.000007301856,0.009991279],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99896723,0.00007240783,0.00004794616,0.00008118854,0.00023875864,1.8371443e-7,0.000004106609,0.0000026405492,0.00058553804],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99952024,0.00007976173,0.00017588997,0.00003711895,0.000028476094,0.00015849677],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99947494,0.000055179662,0.00015172806,0.000036992766,0.00014880969,0.0001323429],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005972964,0.000028067916,0.00009749552,0.00022747161,0.000112755944,0.0000074217382,0.000115433715,0.000081586564,0.00020094156],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014763202,0.000027485119,0.00005184512,0.00021703588,0.00013511122,0.00004479567,0.0000031979523,0.00007066304,0.000025789184],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006994674,0.000035717396,0.06379904,0.00003753764,0.00019254231,0.00017730567,0.118378766,0.0002749349,0.40508935,0.046807095,0.18314894,0.18198884],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012955639,0.00005104157,0.0071452353,0.000013480715,0.000008086829,0.000013818287,0.0006902024,0.00000236908,0.00083481625,0.00043167846,0.9906424,0.000037257156],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013252907,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1760027,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8074935,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007861984,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001002302,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9933179},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4318754752","doi":"10.1139/cjpp-2023-0005","title":"Note of appreciation","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Physiology and Pharmacology","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Chemistry; Medicine","score_opus":0.023088256716065556,"score_gpt":0.3335611390993996,"score_spread":0.31047288238333404,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4318754752","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9928582,0.00016787418,0.0000144672085,0.0029405984,0.0014606337,0.00004330313,0.0000060681805,0.000004353635,0.002504501],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987815,0.00033263612,0.000011618509,0.0002216423,0.00047474008,7.037092e-7,0.0000014812596,0.0000021594221,0.00017352703],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994774,0.00014255529,0.00014105137,0.00004584308,0.000040997194,0.00015214286],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994552,0.00011898521,0.00013007812,0.000020169753,0.00010464958,0.00017092394],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00042245336,0.000032296855,0.0001152188,0.0001721247,0.00017191829,0.0000029985415,0.00007569832,0.000078844554,0.000791406],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003640182,0.000031655403,0.00003342363,0.00016371164,0.00024993907,0.00006320527,0.0000045080506,0.00010114719,0.000006672517],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001080711,0.000024542655,0.007949275,0.000056408673,0.00014480329,0.0000476675,0.032910578,0.000283004,0.8766915,0.014661302,0.037229586,0.029893218],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008972348,0.00030207104,0.08495899,0.000015277072,0.00008830161,0.000011595138,0.00097082707,0.00013758638,0.023034154,0.012352155,0.87710226,0.00012955132],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029796672,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007853832,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85365736,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000025691676,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005373406,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8665341},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4319048415","doi":"10.1093/tandt/ttad002","title":"Managing and preventing cross-border disputes arising with the increasingly popular use of succession substitutes","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Trusts & Trustees","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Probate; Choice of law; Popularity; Business; Common law; Ecological succession; Civil law (Civil law); Law; Law and economics; Leasehold estate; Interim; Property (philosophy); Conflict of laws; Commercial law; Economics; Political science","score_opus":0.026056207600680704,"score_gpt":0.3632673720752475,"score_spread":0.3372111644745668,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4319048415","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99595225,0.00027712435,0.00010104302,0.001622694,0.00011738049,0.00021260846,0.000003176703,0.00013928447,0.001574452],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971048,0.00029601398,0.00027903455,0.00003842142,0.00012547447,0.000007564364,0.0000059491717,0.000015676766,0.0021270313],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987579,0.00013343415,0.00020299714,0.00022294439,0.0003821406,0.00030059207],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99925846,0.00026223334,0.00016074286,0.00016793046,0.00008591863,0.00006474402],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007464524,0.00012028512,0.00017181171,0.00010473463,0.0010653175,0.0003890941,0.00013504126,0.0000666027,0.00004931298],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014440416,0.00008148635,0.000043134554,0.0004549545,0.00043948743,0.0006843732,0.00008884624,0.00011432945,0.000002699925],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010571595,0.000047061123,0.8501224,0.000106053296,0.00007458116,0.000018653796,0.028650561,0.00040799068,0.00076756196,0.013577488,0.00014789433,0.105974026],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005690737,0.000060406932,0.87982994,0.0004332283,0.00011750548,0.000006884837,0.0070753857,0.0012577947,0.0005916327,0.0009307753,0.10880624,0.00032110393],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0067169867,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029414857,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10865834,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000022974727,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004678488,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99989736},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4320162514","doi":"10.7202/1095686ar","title":"L’INTERPRÉTATION ÉVOLUTIVE DE LA NOTION D’ÉLÉMENT D’EXTRANÉITÉ À L’ÈRE DU CYBERESPACE ET SES RÉPERCUSSIONS SUR LE DROIT INTERNATIONAL PRIVÉ","year":2021,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue du notariat","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.013977314449726188,"score_gpt":0.27622414842505416,"score_spread":0.262246833975328,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4320162514","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4244549,0.0020608471,0.031669296,0.41857374,0.0082482165,0.00051122485,0.00022988362,0.00016699628,0.11408492],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9686665,0.0035484366,0.001272328,0.0005156904,0.0019434072,0.000029894509,0.00014258655,0.00003101089,0.023850149],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975776,0.00079943816,0.00039367194,0.0004539213,0.00040519406,0.00037014871],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99841315,0.0006050868,0.00021363453,0.00020755244,0.00038349428,0.00017706108],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010280623,0.00021645172,0.00025309346,0.000092126196,0.0005044417,0.00027136735,0.00023131414,0.00032256875,0.0009008912],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000696551,0.000256237,0.0002449776,0.00036566512,0.00023154957,0.0006570724,0.000119956945,0.00036491768,0.00010086181],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009179788,0.0011374753,0.009336126,0.00007917365,0.00022269812,0.00012729682,0.093364954,0.0020337964,0.0035947105,0.8575982,0.004206812,0.028206976],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009812558,0.000070275244,0.08081776,0.00046891268,0.00013769035,0.00008452829,0.0049298326,0.010847138,0.00041326304,0.0043390733,0.89654344,0.00036681516],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009252309,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0159996,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89233667,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009191072,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00087432825,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999989},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4322736752","doi":"10.1139/cjas-2022-0140","title":"Note of appreciation","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Animal Science","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology","score_opus":0.030890173611715418,"score_gpt":0.31716488915966873,"score_spread":0.2862747155479533,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4322736752","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96962786,0.000038140195,0.000053112723,0.0024400544,0.00053288706,0.00003739557,0.0000030540725,0.0000061461965,0.027261358],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9995456,0.000027017883,0.000094210125,0.000035612375,0.00019728766,1.5677007e-7,1.164351e-7,0.0000017843257,0.00009822595],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990894,0.000026053383,0.00017029565,0.00006218124,0.00040781466,0.00024424956],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990125,0.00003739202,0.0001531728,0.000046326637,0.00034553462,0.00040510498],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019358664,0.000029650897,0.00007241091,0.00037089724,0.00043536327,0.00006208685,0.00030591848,0.000028846565,0.000101831465],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005031516,0.000028323248,0.00004022946,0.0013955729,0.00055035343,0.00039690762,0.000007194212,0.000065997476,0.000014817237],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008404861,0.000034959285,0.081143916,0.000022878838,0.000021652115,0.00015024931,0.14258447,0.00026073918,0.35666162,0.22009811,0.011409043,0.18752833],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016778315,0.00034536482,0.68554133,0.000052234485,0.000011108285,0.000008483551,0.00414725,0.00027389865,0.0021590556,0.0015994394,0.3055785,0.00011556427],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019070493,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.044176508,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6043974,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016398751,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035380009,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9874616},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4327581087","doi":"10.9785/9783504386436-005","title":"Abkürzungsverzeichnis","year":2023,"lang":"de","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Verlag Dr. Otto Schmidt eBooks","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"York University; Northwestern University","keywords":"Psychology","score_opus":0.045810145309151486,"score_gpt":0.2919508196197687,"score_spread":0.24614067431061723,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4327581087","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0010116004,0.00056321477,0.000047491427,0.0018490113,0.007498557,0.0012536354,0.00013496826,0.0011433386,0.9864982],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.016220812,0.0023992492,0.00009553389,0.00064166693,0.005485041,0.00007412802,0.00009674169,0.00032253875,0.9746643],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99324167,0.00018627227,0.0012812308,0.0016165613,0.0021763332,0.0014979447],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962527,0.0003973575,0.0008225627,0.0012563083,0.00044898532,0.00082204473],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014148282,0.001168968,0.001243448,0.0006701616,0.002087016,0.0006206209,0.0012842496,0.0020199993,0.0054805186],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000110605775,0.0012811219,0.0010969723,0.00018573446,0.0013662913,0.00022883133,0.0005282889,0.0015979602,0.029128775],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011516594,0.000044112356,0.00016446327,0.0001240255,0.000578029,0.00030077618,0.0065135574,0.0000025282402,0.00028842944,0.9135886,0.020438496,0.057841808],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006441988,0.000287167,0.0003208328,0.00055726524,0.00051598187,0.0000046558757,0.0005090531,0.000025621652,0.00009713927,0.019046614,0.9766005,0.0013909299],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028399886,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0016905499,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95616204,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003922906,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006557628,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99927557},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4327694445","doi":"10.3917/licla1.108.0005","title":"Introduction","year":2023,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Littératures classiques","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.02081004340441001,"score_gpt":0.31327953128268166,"score_spread":0.29246948787827165,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4327694445","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.050517146,0.011161187,0.00007307639,0.58540297,0.023359518,0.00039944082,0.000045927765,0.0013987713,0.327642],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.17200659,0.01789679,0.00017552743,0.0014846217,0.036494095,0.000040147504,0.00011477217,0.00005082713,0.7717366],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976478,0.00040771026,0.00032050395,0.00048748506,0.00049526757,0.0006412344],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990629,0.00012936264,0.00013739936,0.00031787023,0.0001537152,0.0001987436],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007142121,0.0002307569,0.00024868606,0.00017568066,0.0005847522,0.0002822296,0.00023897743,0.0005015747,0.0015845097],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015481943,0.00024003205,0.00018766348,0.0015433335,0.00075070385,0.00057248835,0.000077539844,0.00049410074,0.0017413691],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016327222,0.0000405331,0.00021209252,0.000035947753,0.00003353595,0.000013132736,0.0048360843,0.000008675033,0.0003710136,0.32065752,0.61601835,0.057756778],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000121171244,0.00009916346,0.0074497033,0.00006377519,0.00004257704,0.0000042573274,0.001230123,0.00014925968,0.0004802975,0.015695574,0.9744076,0.00025645734],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014185259,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012929549,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.58391833,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022531624,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015565306,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993282},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W43601898","doi":"10.21991/c90080","title":"LEGAL IMPLICATIONS OF THE PERSONS CASE","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.043017311832716065,"score_gpt":0.28871949705185274,"score_spread":0.24570218521913667,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W43601898","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.042336345,0.0003466328,0.027381958,0.013256778,0.0025937867,0.00091266754,0.00047487335,0.00019368128,0.9125033],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99769133,0.000027911943,0.00054054783,0.00053692004,0.00012726411,0.000059664344,0.000010950854,0.000005840761,0.0009995706],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982975,0.000108744134,0.00042914881,0.0002976989,0.00037033902,0.00049657817],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987111,0.00010006843,0.00022080708,0.00040710976,0.00036874026,0.00019218374],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00038611598,0.0001757958,0.00019504446,0.00012715145,0.0034050324,0.000048321534,0.00041536707,0.00016657305,0.0007147815],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000285183,0.000147341,0.0002930229,0.0005295454,0.009623548,0.00055779616,0.0001315454,0.00021665558,0.000048430396],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001459826,0.00011075733,0.026752265,0.0000046336468,0.00004012953,0.000025012056,0.001103608,0.000013945319,0.00010247629,0.96833616,0.0025353762,0.00096102245],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00079715403,0.000047988968,0.0073797777,0.00008448215,0.00013972986,0.0019293554,0.013132662,0.000049236474,0.00048773576,0.028951589,0.94658816,0.00041214074],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0050741346,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0065886453,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.955355,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017761948,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021212988,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9978924},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4361994865","doi":"10.18356/9789210011068c004","title":"No. 53193. Canada and Hong Kong Special Administrative Region (under authorization by the Government of the People's Republic of China)","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"United Nations Treaty Series","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"China; People's Republic; Government (linguistics); Authorization; The Republic; Political science; Public administration; Law","score_opus":0.022614355612494624,"score_gpt":0.24433811997321675,"score_spread":0.22172376436072214,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4361994865","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010777309,0.000062099476,0.000039106788,0.018300116,0.00089991954,0.00070676696,0.00076080445,0.00004328918,0.9684106],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.27004576,0.00096976414,0.000007784821,0.000028353521,0.00034964076,0.000010739217,0.0001391297,0.000019226349,0.7284296],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99851376,0.000096263226,0.00026624024,0.00017288106,0.0008373192,0.000113523696],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987174,0.00023603809,0.00044903814,0.00020265464,0.00035226278,0.000042598935],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001973737,0.00014745655,0.00018232154,0.00018959607,0.0008334507,0.00005303988,0.0001741032,0.00015447833,0.0000903208],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00029585118,0.00010648704,0.000064200714,0.00074318826,0.00040211703,0.00015435214,0.000051770017,0.00016218133,3.8685224e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002304397,0.000013432968,0.00050184136,0.000016106029,0.00006986782,6.468834e-7,0.005926299,0.0000077943205,0.0000061388528,0.980419,0.012111955,0.0009039009],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020464254,0.00009477769,0.029127141,0.00014314249,0.00015236517,0.0000026719024,0.0076129124,0.000019860436,0.000073084426,0.004108725,0.9582589,0.0002017434],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.19749631,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.92512006,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97631025,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021781384,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006513033,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8078476},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4366000912","doi":"10.18356/9789210011051c012","title":"No. 53188. Canada and Turkey","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"United Nations Treaty Series","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Property (philosophy); Political science; Geography; Philosophy","score_opus":0.020975249175150795,"score_gpt":0.24713807263277546,"score_spread":0.22616282345762467,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4366000912","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00027712097,0.000098505814,0.0000011027992,0.0033724273,0.0005670799,0.00019072474,0.00033314765,0.00017985274,0.99498004],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0011404332,0.003549497,0.00003456143,0.00009459627,0.0003352283,0.0000103851025,0.00041900284,0.000028411265,0.99438787],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99909925,0.000025627593,0.00016810634,0.00019334107,0.0003493581,0.00016434093],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990771,0.00020176728,0.00009064975,0.00013998909,0.00038153114,0.000108996705],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00011413368,0.00016062256,0.0001615588,0.0010955862,0.00093449623,0.000095793235,0.00009793655,0.00021018558,0.0004474356],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018350309,0.00016840326,0.000040859988,0.00047358457,0.00023619345,0.00014378561,0.000032007963,0.00016701018,0.000056212593],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000076177403,0.0000037718578,0.00004616963,0.000011813777,0.000057873785,0.000014283948,0.0014267891,0.0000033386784,7.435177e-7,0.9620457,0.034981813,0.0014000647],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008312468,0.000021139786,0.00016810285,0.000047009587,0.000046927664,0.0000013350409,0.000406696,0.000004705798,0.0000014545562,0.0032182864,0.9958295,0.00017167644],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.890715,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9934622,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96084774,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016191642,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006852984,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7187484},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4366338464","doi":"10.5463/thesis.109","title":"Huwelijkse voorwaarden met gescheiden vermogens. Koude uitsluiting in het licht van de dynamische en affectieve relatie van echtgenoten.","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"L'Alliance Boviteq","funders":"","keywords":"Spouse; Property (philosophy); Covenant; Solidarity; Feeling; Community property; Event (particle physics); Cohabitation; Political science; Law; Psychology; Social psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.015037865019044723,"score_gpt":0.32919691876135737,"score_spread":0.3141590537423126,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4366338464","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5876404,0.00032347624,0.00007953717,0.0005485427,0.0014087764,0.0010305308,0.000032747488,0.0006324715,0.40830353],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.77090603,0.001084972,0.00088981516,0.00018177161,0.0011696101,0.0001432904,0.00078843225,0.00018546169,0.22465062],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99569124,0.0007498922,0.00074716605,0.0007936344,0.0010235189,0.0009945753],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99786645,0.0007586994,0.00039460548,0.0004036712,0.00026400044,0.00031256035],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031380914,0.0004910929,0.00065827713,0.000540509,0.00069955044,0.0002726717,0.00060259434,0.0012690462,0.0014619076],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015058339,0.00053530437,0.00034450105,0.0009288507,0.0000742364,0.00032349944,0.000090223606,0.0010938045,0.00055892207],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00055653794,0.00046473174,0.027920922,0.0008108192,0.0012035574,0.0007539771,0.64260817,0.0008613907,0.008983389,0.023532316,0.010309778,0.2819944],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0038178605,0.0008542836,0.2956769,0.0024395331,0.0015736914,0.000023554925,0.30690238,0.0033757382,0.003164266,0.018598435,0.35784715,0.005726232],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.031180497,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16674592,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3475374,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000984844,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008777159,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99970984},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4366381860","doi":"10.1017/9781839703102.068","title":"Living Without The Jurisdictional Rules of Brussels IIA","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"Family matters","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Honour; Privilege (computing); Aside; Family law; Law; Political science; Sociology; Law and economics; Art","score_opus":0.01740378811191115,"score_gpt":0.28218167395708854,"score_spread":0.26477788584517736,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4366381860","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0031931237,0.0007161123,0.000063563915,0.0031905735,0.001460174,0.00031873357,0.00012768476,0.00018224586,0.9907478],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0155333495,0.00089048524,0.00017739828,0.003985368,0.001453506,0.00007273986,0.00004046524,0.00025629692,0.9775904],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99852544,0.00022654569,0.0001867788,0.00020720402,0.0006347042,0.00021933211],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993076,0.00014627488,0.00023728413,0.00023760389,0.000021779388,0.000049464303],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005439313,0.00013994964,0.0002062149,0.00014514757,0.00039769802,0.000044876317,0.00038904848,0.000113733026,0.019525083],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000011480555,0.00011537517,0.00012835483,0.00013012011,0.0003057397,0.00004134499,0.00010849317,0.00021130846,0.00010926481],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000038363487,0.00002804989,0.002625889,0.000023203389,0.00008230377,0.0000011227663,0.0055264514,0.0000024808096,0.00003222111,0.0045017125,0.9855155,0.0016572609],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000055413304,0.000013889484,0.011123866,0.000078659854,0.00004058172,5.0091074e-7,0.001936632,0.0000027348367,3.345057e-7,0.0001678256,0.98645383,0.0001257381],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0104630515,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009329766,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019415818,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008214412,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015309318,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99612635},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4366958445","doi":"10.5040/9781509954308","title":"The Common Law Jurisprudence of the Conflict of Laws","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Hart Publishing eBooks","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Choice of law; Jurisprudence; Conflict of laws; Jurisdiction; Political science; Common law; Comparative law; Municipal law; Enforcement; Civil law (Civil law); Politics; Public law","score_opus":0.05120477763624903,"score_gpt":0.30774858891451606,"score_spread":0.25654381127826703,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4366958445","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00039258032,0.00022518203,0.0000024232795,0.002818225,0.001840982,0.00047596468,0.00007926711,0.00011348017,0.9940519],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.032423683,0.00010899855,0.00000629746,0.00032530466,0.0006786504,0.000025028927,0.0000129400505,0.000042198164,0.9663769],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972019,0.00030105966,0.00058938825,0.0002632331,0.001281051,0.00036336645],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968738,0.0010739255,0.0008000798,0.00075815513,0.00040288636,0.00009113663],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028991925,0.00019404663,0.00038417985,0.00006453259,0.0012309306,0.0009142942,0.0018073608,0.00043798206,0.00003965586],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00035708686,0.0001270261,0.0003265019,0.00011726549,0.0017598218,0.00035991074,0.0003958266,0.0007386309,0.0000140254415],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008843558,0.0000071855516,0.00004002245,0.000039926337,0.000048186936,0.0000011835663,0.00662078,7.140053e-7,0.000038547016,0.84223545,0.14597024,0.00498893],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001011517,0.000020848123,0.00019468182,0.0003119637,0.000047297624,5.088083e-7,0.00034886008,0.000003284465,0.00016329538,0.01730882,0.98137003,0.00012927718],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0076885577,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.033870526,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83539975,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012864555,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009816595,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989193},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4367551791","doi":"10.37232/sp.1987.4.6","title":"Konkubinat w świetle prawa państw kapitalistycznych","year":2023,"lang":"pl","type":"article","venue":"Studia Prawnicze / The Legal Studies","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cohabitation; Family law; Common law; Marriage law; Law; Comparative law; Political science; Legislation; Sociology","score_opus":0.07460446297322261,"score_gpt":0.3837372752043912,"score_spread":0.3091328122311686,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4367551791","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.26649225,0.10329947,0.000012045998,0.2712234,0.020989787,0.0036836464,0.00020805042,0.0016453072,0.33244604],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.84707695,0.052244276,0.0000157816,0.0009640994,0.0029713013,0.0002986051,0.000014381563,0.00007553167,0.09633906],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9939662,0.0008675055,0.0008816806,0.0010021975,0.0016650361,0.0016173848],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99640995,0.0014827863,0.00046235492,0.0008451509,0.00057750405,0.00022227858],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035781593,0.0006869604,0.0009777896,0.00018351804,0.0059960647,0.00060470257,0.0011233005,0.0002856189,0.0002511937],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013505401,0.0004928626,0.00053659646,0.002707054,0.0022355171,0.0006888538,0.0014205163,0.0008198688,0.0037494542],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013726094,0.00042380765,0.0050684074,0.00023979784,0.0039039631,0.0001727731,0.17300238,0.00003970141,0.00008089733,0.19953088,0.5913714,0.026028724],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006842193,0.00032664492,0.018074265,0.00013967899,0.0003907335,0.0000041516564,0.06374865,0.000022105103,0.000033018565,0.002529858,0.9134544,0.00059225847],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005407386,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008185197,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5805847,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003932737,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00046089906,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997523},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4368347671","doi":"10.3917/rn.231.0098","title":"Ithaque, Encore","year":2023,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"La Revue Nouvelle","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Musée de la Civilisation","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.028424257591278805,"score_gpt":0.29840853446605936,"score_spread":0.26998427687478055,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4368347671","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.29616883,0.0024691315,0.00006821266,0.05571402,0.006437858,0.00023606721,0.000034495795,0.00033022425,0.63854116],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4294111,0.0048530996,0.00012567558,0.0002313494,0.0020984595,0.00001590802,0.000013699096,0.000023022578,0.5632277],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99868935,0.00017639315,0.00020427236,0.00026635095,0.00023164148,0.00043199578],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99928087,0.00022033084,0.00007812666,0.00020549085,0.000057152192,0.00015803278],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00062422635,0.0001264428,0.00017356106,0.000072966184,0.00042949498,0.00006606676,0.0002108901,0.00027063806,0.003328131],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000078878016,0.00014434358,0.00013748332,0.0010360744,0.00027878137,0.00016113758,0.00008255312,0.00021021525,0.0043552467],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001682513,0.00015592779,0.004136548,0.000194198,0.000061153354,0.00020903898,0.22736375,0.000098563214,0.00029783515,0.22014412,0.24763618,0.29968587],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015399561,0.000045749188,0.0047984184,0.00011415249,0.000026393465,0.000006693383,0.012910269,0.0006258951,0.000040124647,0.0015965537,0.97951025,0.00017151475],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022209594,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012771836,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.73187405,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007812528,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001377584,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.997583},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4376598791","doi":"10.1017/9781009153515.011","title":"Cambridge Studies in International and Comparative Law: 168","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.13521127943875583,"score_gpt":0.41845939668032206,"score_spread":0.28324811724156623,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4376598791","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00033655023,0.0014993371,0.0000012225097,0.0008187642,0.0006668998,0.00012660408,0.000015361149,0.000051241757,0.99648404],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.026287334,0.0017010282,0.000031125273,0.00018455935,0.00030046498,0.000019872414,0.0000104395185,0.000015746362,0.97144943],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994706,0.00006207657,0.000074008385,0.00012889439,0.00018666896,0.000077750345],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999835,0.00004342899,0.00004583589,0.000039962095,0.0000148376375,0.00002092623],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00016293752,0.00006176103,0.00013514444,0.00008678238,0.000099468074,0.000022658174,0.000080664395,0.000043957873,0.007954348],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000008130819,0.000058083147,0.00001672262,0.00005802708,0.00021797897,0.000033146385,0.00007013359,0.00008478764,0.000014151161],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000030878925,0.000017752645,0.0007264715,0.0000044163,0.00005578368,0.000004607981,0.013228252,1.6431032e-7,3.4996637e-7,0.4321787,0.553332,0.00044841852],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010706449,0.000008838668,0.00029859907,0.00001452108,0.0000037865839,2.465129e-7,0.015798211,0.0000020319344,2.3457791e-7,0.0001016231,0.9835982,0.00006668141],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.028105028,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16038921,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4320771,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000093133014,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002497171,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9929525},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4376877431","doi":"10.1108/oxan-db279101","title":"Canadian debate over streaming services moves venues","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Emerald expert briefings","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Outrage; Journalism; Business; The Internet; Political science; Net neutrality; Advertising; Public relations; Law; Computer science; Politics; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.014825353117477222,"score_gpt":0.29845969476006107,"score_spread":0.28363434164258383,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4376877431","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6394027,0.0009307849,0.000003346155,0.34409395,0.000579989,0.00020982386,0.000023941784,0.0005896514,0.0141658],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8590865,0.0013668245,0.000072662326,0.1261297,0.0015513644,0.000040918876,0.000077459066,0.000047463305,0.011627114],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99890596,0.000039293645,0.00012835521,0.00020373832,0.00025924877,0.0004633937],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99953187,0.000037779213,0.000042378586,0.00012817812,0.00003654632,0.00022326756],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020845587,0.00009838653,0.00010771732,0.000113469665,0.0008191449,0.00016801656,0.00018591994,0.00008458974,0.0003817394],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002287059,0.00010886023,0.00005809638,0.0003740065,0.000059219306,0.0002736568,0.000028772345,0.000076851255,0.00017154423],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011861286,0.000023709552,0.002414348,0.000026054748,0.00005950734,0.00007729736,0.28312132,0.000016202264,0.0027557441,0.007816615,0.6491585,0.054518845],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008938998,0.000008393243,0.012116522,0.00003300658,0.0000030926221,4.5094993e-7,0.00056600844,0.00012682329,0.000102737715,0.00043117054,0.9863859,0.00013652054],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.990255,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7836553,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3372274,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012689311,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013440762,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6300283},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4377080528","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780192844477.002.0011","title":"Canada","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Geography","score_opus":0.01572854066853991,"score_gpt":0.2824721603607427,"score_spread":0.2667436196922028,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4377080528","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[3.6883702e-7,0.000042703323,0.0000034398677,0.001991317,0.0010560945,0.00004901521,0.00000919957,0.0004823655,0.9963655],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.000094138675,0.00024503213,0.0000070302976,0.00020148481,0.00074229285,0.0000021541834,0.0000012134549,0.0001469157,0.9985597],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99962765,0.000010543476,0.000029313724,0.000062296385,0.00017830243,0.00009186792],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998685,0.000014017844,0.000018925233,0.000052609423,0.000005717117,0.000040194598],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000052222927,0.000033328775,0.000047872094,0.000023578534,0.000056565947,0.000011332073,0.000059844773,0.00006976016,0.01828771],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000014084483,0.000031199957,0.0000128184465,0.00006645698,0.000020060856,0.0000055415885,0.000006630474,0.000030158631,0.00017986886],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[4.9378702e-8,5.340241e-7,0.00002178958,7.8917566e-7,0.0000040872533,0.0000020331986,0.00005390551,7.8599625e-9,1.6990587e-8,0.018309008,0.97694784,0.0046599363],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001158103,7.423893e-7,0.000055605982,0.00000827389,0.000002059651,1.2563611e-8,0.00012084955,1.6815883e-7,9.8294706e-8,0.000017600514,0.9997397,0.00004329474],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9998136,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999914,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022791872,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000718059,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00081894355,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9826097},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4377239287","doi":"10.1515/9780228012252-020","title":"University of Toronto Faculty of Law Legal Process (LAW100HIS – Four Credits) First Year – Winter 2019","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"McGill-Queen's University Press eBooks","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.02175647194421352,"score_gpt":0.23974661510592823,"score_spread":0.21799014316171472,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4377239287","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00008015057,0.000004654225,0.000015194887,0.0001984275,0.00033201816,0.00045715293,0.0019778921,0.00010351356,0.996831],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.027845977,0.0003340694,0.0000604657,0.00002184022,0.00011854471,3.12957e-7,0.00007977886,0.000034802706,0.9715042],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99800855,0.00009991269,0.00024348861,0.0005037856,0.00082172436,0.0003225206],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99836844,0.00007211644,0.00053292996,0.00040587285,0.0004335102,0.0001871454],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00023233416,0.00030409283,0.00054678746,0.00008546819,0.0010385967,0.000020036112,0.0008459331,0.00041315978,0.001955914],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000009393995,0.00039671475,0.0003883502,0.000017883305,0.0006488405,0.00045035526,0.0004938049,0.0003644892,0.000005954358],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028043165,0.00003797222,0.000012595024,0.0001073449,0.00022027979,0.000068711655,0.0035011494,0.000013919255,0.0000030339475,0.9901843,0.005255663,0.00031459285],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00067097147,0.00013901247,0.000031771622,0.00012376512,0.0002680717,6.8783925e-7,0.0015958963,0.0000024618034,0.000042476437,0.00017615074,0.99658245,0.0003662889],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.18232559,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027391526,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9913268,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006872574,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018865641,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998485},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4377254407","doi":"10.1515/9780773580961-003","title":"The Relationship of International and Domestic Law as Understood in Canada","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"McGill-Queen's University Press eBooks","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Geography","score_opus":0.019466403389846003,"score_gpt":0.2359486315445049,"score_spread":0.2164822281546589,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4377254407","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00030134982,0.000002650349,0.0000031583213,0.0009043561,0.00034570176,0.00019470112,0.000072407754,0.000015644366,0.99816],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3750649,0.00017888412,0.000015652613,0.000048578517,0.000043245644,4.313725e-7,0.0000065261497,0.000009717008,0.62463206],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990861,0.000055856748,0.00015229019,0.00018712413,0.00037121083,0.00014743362],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989801,0.00048678528,0.00018048442,0.0001607897,0.00010589449,0.00008591814],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00018506919,0.000119745266,0.00014782051,0.00007414301,0.00069990277,0.000026872454,0.00028750542,0.00020633853,0.000027618367],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004537687,0.00012153068,0.000047042926,0.000010192869,0.00044276458,0.0000753381,0.00012202368,0.00041024448,8.036594e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027200604,0.0000025190132,0.00013615689,0.0000061633127,0.000029695584,0.000024004805,0.00041337538,0.000001710663,8.300525e-7,0.9988365,0.000056476336,0.00046533425],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024306338,0.0000117555355,0.0005188535,0.000056100795,0.00003547547,7.9028064e-7,0.0005000401,0.0000020496955,0.0000058758465,0.009314198,0.9891883,0.00012348327],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.93801874,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6457209,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98952234,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005008671,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00045939587,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5383157},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4377261219","doi":"10.1515/9780773559998","title":"Legalizing Misandry","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"McGill-Queen's University Press eBooks","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Geology","score_opus":0.02208816710523791,"score_gpt":0.2450250039522314,"score_spread":0.22293683684699347,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4377261219","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000073665033,0.0000036474419,0.000045580833,0.00026689924,0.0005271195,0.0004286785,0.00022480682,0.00038658312,0.99810934],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00045329804,0.00010971902,0.00007830903,0.000104838786,0.00060951285,0.0000011948712,0.000070011185,0.00004473069,0.99852836],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977701,0.00021725308,0.00023611163,0.0005559728,0.0006832371,0.0005373778],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99875826,0.00011000732,0.00029325654,0.00039574562,0.00020765708,0.00023509485],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00027302976,0.0003508496,0.00042589408,0.000239107,0.0016918866,0.000110940586,0.00058399333,0.0007197306,0.00008410107],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000014931676,0.00044274176,0.0003271951,0.00003541771,0.00041708915,0.00022060919,0.00023556386,0.0005452573,0.000022859624],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003658489,0.000020786429,0.0000051505435,0.000045347628,0.00008052917,0.00014826127,0.00069345464,0.0000053828485,0.0000024647507,0.8413394,0.15559836,0.0020242534],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004086375,0.000030045841,0.000013970643,0.00014362145,0.00018332996,5.8343045e-7,0.00016188745,0.0000025047557,0.000026429718,0.00042541776,0.99811965,0.00048389495],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03373767,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005554128,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8425213,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00090189854,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00034273692,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998024},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4378193692","doi":"10.52975/llt.2023v91.002","title":"Editors’ Note / Note de la rédaction","year":2023,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Labour / Le Travail","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan; Mount Royal University","funders":"","keywords":"Redaction; Philosophy; Theology","score_opus":0.015226853676384607,"score_gpt":0.3030467427302455,"score_spread":0.2878198890538609,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4378193692","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.79258776,0.0019537236,0.0020511795,0.06320554,0.043190185,0.00039036418,0.00012288739,0.0010138951,0.09548449],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.67950284,0.0036090417,0.00020504075,0.0004920581,0.024509294,0.000021232117,0.000016614515,0.000049466413,0.29159442],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99770117,0.0005447538,0.00026326758,0.00033132744,0.000486146,0.0006733176],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99899733,0.0003342823,0.00011874266,0.00020949401,0.000096959426,0.00024319578],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015930095,0.00018893495,0.00020825161,0.000107448854,0.00073676003,0.00021355679,0.0002262656,0.0004974168,0.00083312445],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013156298,0.00022339856,0.00015409727,0.001057799,0.0005288548,0.0003908581,0.00004096244,0.00043748363,0.0020104959],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000064460364,0.00032668948,0.002046128,0.00014732528,0.000077057084,0.00011672784,0.10294081,0.00031354962,0.0069524767,0.0967564,0.20400502,0.58625335],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039331862,0.000058080455,0.054936245,0.000052380543,0.000033726403,0.000005412891,0.0012154758,0.00062678434,0.00043690338,0.0028453371,0.93916357,0.00023276312],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.029206939,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003323616,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.73515856,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003719269,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00055073336,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99876654},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4379530600","doi":"10.1017/s0069005800011139","title":"I. Commerce","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Yearbook of international Law/Annuaire canadien de droit international","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Content (measure theory); Computer science; Information retrieval; World Wide Web; Database; Business; Internet privacy; Mathematics","score_opus":0.008728747301879593,"score_gpt":0.25316628782322925,"score_spread":0.24443754052134967,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4379530600","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.035176538,0.000020946796,0.0003144893,0.012774893,0.0019368645,0.0001329548,0.00018866843,0.000044460125,0.9494102],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9702018,0.000029277484,0.0003296594,0.0030926794,0.0010772693,0.000016942346,0.00008646434,0.00002112728,0.025144763],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983105,0.00007895593,0.00032624113,0.00025535116,0.0005827068,0.00044621326],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998298,0.000108139284,0.00014619337,0.00019653857,0.00059104775,0.00066008006],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007104577,0.00013074472,0.00016241852,0.0003596289,0.00026757177,0.00010668502,0.0009105389,0.00014862203,0.0019339962],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003621223,0.00017306634,0.00012502777,0.00011773341,0.00033119193,0.00028633053,0.00003598338,0.00018823255,0.00007725543],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011320882,0.000016881018,0.0064620357,0.0000028351599,0.00007600704,0.000015705795,0.001490085,0.000031704127,0.000029828205,0.9801373,0.0069062803,0.004820005],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025470683,0.000029235094,0.008085477,0.000049273418,0.000010857921,0.000014075631,0.00034181133,0.0006314011,0.000054664677,0.008661922,0.98168826,0.00017829012],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6764689,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9216428,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.974782,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002186704,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000972957,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9989784},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4379531584","doi":"10.1017/s006900580001119x","title":"Canadian Cases in Private International Law in 2013 / Jurisprudence canadienne en matière de droit international privé en 2013","year":2014,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Yearbook of international Law/Annuaire canadien de droit international","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Political science; Law; Library science; Computer science","score_opus":0.006593393487994693,"score_gpt":0.24028775102706204,"score_spread":0.23369435753906734,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4379531584","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.25837195,0.00034051645,0.00012827196,0.10150965,0.012834195,0.0007959825,0.0032967813,0.000058853584,0.6226638],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9312579,0.00079608074,0.0009446013,0.0041904114,0.0030184991,0.00014425178,0.00069899694,0.000109727014,0.058839552],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99332356,0.00046164435,0.0016041653,0.001137309,0.0013463724,0.0021269538],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99492353,0.0005995299,0.00056249317,0.00054963847,0.001042911,0.002321925],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026587488,0.00066723453,0.0006928905,0.0023991691,0.00031188855,0.0004267526,0.0037211769,0.000866672,0.007629918],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010231459,0.00097435416,0.0003400665,0.0006040511,0.00083601964,0.0015983627,0.00023030507,0.0012069613,0.0002661628],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000785411,0.00014139866,0.039920125,0.000035304896,0.0003896186,0.0011097693,0.0073976647,0.0016623428,0.000043971708,0.93529433,0.007079765,0.0068471623],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012309923,0.0001008844,0.039505508,0.0008789625,0.00004385601,0.00035994628,0.0010000304,0.011034253,0.00005844464,0.024016492,0.9208839,0.0008867213],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9966086,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9998118,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9138041,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04499682,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0053049135,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992707},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4379531609","doi":"10.1017/s0069005800011231","title":"Cross-Border Torts: Canadian-U.S. Litigation Strategies. By Wyatt Pickett. Markham: LexisNexis, 2013. 350 pages.","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Yearbook of international Law/Annuaire canadien de droit international","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Archaeology; Geography","score_opus":0.0075093967714318244,"score_gpt":0.29512337914037384,"score_spread":0.28761398236894203,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4379531609","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.056515254,0.00014786932,0.000259575,0.0145089505,0.002904923,0.00032874098,0.0012496106,0.00006774348,0.9240173],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9443593,0.00015006048,0.00019773906,0.0031603903,0.0012805851,0.000052115225,0.0007260044,0.000048169593,0.050025653],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969338,0.0001142382,0.0006114465,0.00052821205,0.0009077623,0.0009045329],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99655885,0.00011959305,0.00027245947,0.00031923535,0.0011984187,0.0015314271],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009686321,0.0002811995,0.00027838428,0.00060210144,0.0005383638,0.0005257685,0.0010366945,0.00035428762,0.007741079],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003535857,0.00037442363,0.00017552011,0.00021612187,0.0006134109,0.00097278453,0.000041459898,0.00035131024,0.000098652636],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025529434,0.00003331267,0.011747851,0.000011997657,0.0002008035,0.00004636008,0.0018979326,0.00013244768,0.000068601774,0.90297,0.07497127,0.007893906],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039441537,0.000046632627,0.011003886,0.000076608754,0.000017259232,0.000019167652,0.0005030648,0.00048188661,0.00007541606,0.0054129697,0.981593,0.0003756741],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97974855,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99717414,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90662175,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0055496274,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00453498,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998708},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4379531681","doi":"10.1017/s0069005800011292","title":"Index of Cases / Index de la jurisprudence","year":2014,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Yearbook of international Law/Annuaire canadien de droit international","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Index (typography); Jurisprudence; Statistics; Mathematics; Political science; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.007211791566789055,"score_gpt":0.26286725545028017,"score_spread":0.25565546388349114,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4379531681","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20749265,0.00041733368,0.0009430841,0.009258839,0.0037599546,0.0002085611,0.0009291722,0.000027904272,0.7769625],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9665439,0.00019459522,0.0002517578,0.0012087844,0.0012730786,0.000019334244,0.000051476192,0.000035899895,0.030421186],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99715537,0.00026580584,0.0006570965,0.0003916228,0.0008684076,0.00066167465],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99697614,0.00053187925,0.00043643973,0.00027010782,0.00091023307,0.0008751768],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013236086,0.0002518584,0.00033549604,0.00056819315,0.00018818586,0.000112137655,0.0012440876,0.00043626747,0.0022790951],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008070342,0.0003487505,0.00024302094,0.00026208654,0.0014460405,0.00044543174,0.00007565051,0.00041489874,0.000031485022],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000044524553,0.00007399053,0.04999089,0.00003331069,0.00026221244,0.00017295037,0.002412816,0.000467188,0.00004908808,0.9322361,0.0047300234,0.009526921],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005266327,0.00010839248,0.039511856,0.00045105058,0.00004792673,0.00024947466,0.00049477286,0.0057212994,0.00019599692,0.01966378,0.9326806,0.00034822297],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8285668,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8549008,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92795056,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0039969347,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031146964,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99989647},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4381145157","doi":"10.4324/9781003352747","title":"Courts, Pluralism and Law in the Everyday","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Pluralism (philosophy); Law; Law and economics; Political science; Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.030535560266000045,"score_gpt":0.30458137594127493,"score_spread":0.27404581567527486,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4381145157","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00012626342,0.00018265875,0.0000011091522,0.007908778,0.00033864216,0.00019934455,0.000006487226,0.000064702064,0.991172],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0028857286,0.0009767045,0.0000036910376,0.001297934,0.0005189689,0.000008825346,0.00001222469,0.000009567611,0.99428636],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99920326,0.00007470961,0.000112205715,0.00013969197,0.00031996184,0.00015016297],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995761,0.00022290467,0.000039344657,0.00010620392,0.000023104389,0.00003234439],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00077403197,0.00008049925,0.000114539915,0.000040265666,0.0002575649,0.000118721284,0.00016090914,0.0001882585,0.00024561194],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000016989125,0.00005528395,0.000037871563,0.00005342097,0.00022733392,0.000067194305,0.000030169873,0.00018356851,0.00007793466],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[9.477508e-7,0.0000027020235,0.000010414884,0.0000033824804,0.0000042874826,0.0000074840286,0.009672195,7.647282e-8,1.08701784e-7,0.8543589,0.13401008,0.0019293961],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000055099357,0.000007815714,0.00038138253,0.000026454636,0.000008376917,4.350869e-7,0.0007766967,0.000001475316,8.743303e-8,0.032919955,0.9657446,0.00007759003],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0114570595,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07450691,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83173454,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006268339,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014560531,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9951257},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4382246855","doi":"10.4324/9781003312994-1","title":"Introduction","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy","score_opus":0.035352377535896325,"score_gpt":0.291090700144741,"score_spread":0.25573832260884466,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4382246855","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000016074638,0.000023426117,0.00002922853,0.01360518,0.0020626013,0.00009754654,0.0000025296672,0.00036377923,0.9838141],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00007232904,0.0008175894,0.00001857863,0.00007302951,0.008464988,0.000002082328,0.000015992175,0.00001961766,0.99051577],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993431,0.0000075623916,0.0001025466,0.00017067813,0.0002666157,0.00010950301],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996992,0.000022765702,0.0000493763,0.00011581441,0.000063421576,0.00004947507],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002596677,0.00007401046,0.000094139235,0.00007526488,0.00022613363,0.000042912085,0.00007296471,0.00020821483,0.012448204],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000022885533,0.00007462596,0.00007011843,0.000023530922,0.000091909016,0.000053066815,0.000019277306,0.00012364716,0.0041975826],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[9.98024e-7,8.5659696e-7,5.0357266e-7,0.000001499391,0.000008159707,0.0000010313861,0.0003646752,1.3168784e-7,9.75935e-7,0.82667077,0.1524969,0.020453485],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001935466,0.000008873357,0.000009635741,0.0000064593173,0.000012045923,1.7691349e-7,0.000066129665,6.898687e-7,0.0000010282107,0.038647022,0.9611428,0.00008579545],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005924314,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00257176,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8086459,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000640079,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006841088,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99657774},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4382290491","doi":"10.1515/9780228012450-011","title":"British Columbia: Honour and Circumstance; Regulation by Independent Tribunal Avoided","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"McGill-Queen's University Press eBooks","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Honour; Tribunal; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.012101517338838522,"score_gpt":0.20657470230339006,"score_spread":0.19447318496455154,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4382290491","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00041495252,0.000013412752,0.000027943179,0.00022040289,0.00034462241,0.0006681758,0.0010000325,0.00019541357,0.997115],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.01881857,0.0009705342,0.000018527908,0.000078499485,0.00013806304,0.0000032102278,0.00014158568,0.000039205155,0.9797918],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977569,0.00017635846,0.00025271124,0.0006374507,0.00081052445,0.00036607834],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99887633,0.00008406719,0.00035373893,0.0002614819,0.00017585077,0.00024850847],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003640798,0.0002223425,0.00039172734,0.00009589768,0.002138055,0.00028558867,0.00033284732,0.00048625877,0.0019414643],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000015873527,0.0004303931,0.00016865286,0.000023746059,0.00033978748,0.0002715702,0.00031065565,0.0006049224,0.0000023009038],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010876864,0.00004340774,0.00008801019,0.00005961711,0.0002394667,0.00025018124,0.0012082832,0.0000032816843,0.000018234507,0.9271407,0.054644503,0.016195556],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007713975,0.00006474518,0.00026687837,0.00007372379,0.00014961707,0.000004173169,0.00032264853,0.0000025964823,0.0000046690534,0.0018256978,0.996077,0.00043686116],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.16142623,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002893622,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9414325,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00075244886,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012786736,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998148},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4383375884","doi":"10.17159/obiter.v44i2.14052","title":"TACIT CHOICE OF LAW IN INTERNATIONAL COMMERCIAL CONTRACTS: PROGRESS OR STAGNATION IN THE COMMON- LAW JURISDICTIONS?","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Obiter","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Common law; Law; Comparative law; Private law; Municipal law; Public law; Commercial law; Choice of law; Civil law (Civil law); Political science; Conflict of laws","score_opus":0.056463391715519694,"score_gpt":0.387100000997883,"score_spread":0.3306366092823633,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4383375884","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.841284,0.000032871354,0.0000066661314,0.016853737,0.00068580324,0.0004599224,0.000038857426,0.00006161113,0.14057657],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99826896,0.000038836715,0.00001569706,0.0008440932,0.00023899258,0.00005790704,0.000034217057,0.0000055069454,0.0004957938],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99889666,0.0001886115,0.00026431063,0.00011382331,0.0003656975,0.00017087495],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993957,0.00032287615,0.00008553861,0.00010290837,0.00006915442,0.00002379013],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00086558907,0.000061888866,0.00011168713,0.00011295649,0.00016639342,0.000087084605,0.00023932676,0.00007677641,0.0001658885],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000041221072,0.000047332545,0.000036559642,0.0004265278,0.00024304111,0.00034413568,0.00002899499,0.00014813576,0.000019161915],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017560514,0.0005327446,0.17323849,0.000019611094,0.000029473751,0.000031181506,0.09666494,0.00003560558,0.00008916772,0.6994386,0.0022443815,0.027500255],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00059155317,0.00003590092,0.2300343,0.000041614385,0.0000050223302,5.186618e-7,0.0012566189,0.0001413896,0.000028532511,0.0009516115,0.76684296,0.00006997895],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013202896,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14795019,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.76459855,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007200556,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000037214042,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99336827},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4384519883","doi":"10.1093/lawfam/ebad017","title":"Cohabitant protection on relationship breakdown in Ireland: A lesson in illusory justice?","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Law Policy and the Family","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statutory law; Irish; Cohabitation; Jurisprudence; General partnership; Political science; Economic Justice; Law; Law reform; Common law","score_opus":0.062315521629999204,"score_gpt":0.36818286033509456,"score_spread":0.30586733870509536,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4384519883","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.89643484,0.00009795245,0.000038553135,0.04170594,0.0007604274,0.0001713695,0.000005940321,0.000016915345,0.060768053],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976029,0.00047771572,0.0000069819785,0.0007566027,0.00071345066,0.0000066843177,9.2974966e-7,0.0000044129824,0.0004303708],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99884814,0.00023393362,0.00030139106,0.00007140805,0.00041771453,0.00012743492],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99916786,0.00047827588,0.00016705344,0.00004357129,0.00010344681,0.00003976558],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017606074,0.000056995905,0.00010971141,0.00037062896,0.00016099557,0.000070186405,0.00016942433,0.000063832245,0.0000041743547],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005235753,0.000041356627,0.000053235,0.00028527962,0.00019390428,0.00019435356,0.000022211718,0.00026235482,0.000010327333],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00054314255,0.000041089686,0.0018599228,0.0000037423513,0.000018838662,0.000031117597,0.015351206,0.00034225447,0.000058987032,0.9757398,0.00009563602,0.0059142937],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.007018906,0.0002026669,0.5413333,0.0005167982,0.000036179263,0.000055447006,0.005136231,0.0012708526,0.000024916106,0.26008618,0.18411463,0.00020389489],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0149952965,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0042257407,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7156536,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018427124,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012274475,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9915639},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385371242","doi":"10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190202095.002.0003","title":"Copyright Page","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Library science; Political science; Czech; Excellence; Scholarship; Media studies; History; Geography; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.02876055650433393,"score_gpt":0.32799408821852327,"score_spread":0.2992335317141893,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385371242","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[6.781137e-7,0.00036046148,0.000030495274,0.00058795285,0.00075739983,0.00009995159,0.000010047215,0.00033686135,0.99781615],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.000096015865,0.00024037382,0.00010114689,0.00012871865,0.0014311107,0.0000025824204,0.000012056629,0.00006839467,0.9979196],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994478,0.00003505438,0.00004990527,0.000100432146,0.00024605906,0.00012073987],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997392,0.000007239632,0.00003900547,0.00009837107,0.000024073763,0.000092052454],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00018631738,0.00006157076,0.000091945934,0.000052718722,0.00006392231,0.000031994176,0.00010276878,0.00019209865,0.07801857],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000012866499,0.000050868446,0.00002623031,0.00007483255,0.00008187187,0.00001954194,0.000012403977,0.000054141536,0.0014607493],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[4.0733366e-7,0.0000054155685,0.000007468428,0.0000015413935,0.0000059125205,0.0000014108836,0.0006123906,1.8604387e-9,4.0572e-7,0.017890012,0.98000425,0.0014708062],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000049867125,0.000005810906,0.000002495889,0.000011646233,0.0000062523586,6.61934e-8,0.00019928264,4.4114012e-7,4.4116436e-7,0.00024762793,0.99939764,0.000078413395],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014877224,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.035872035,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07655782,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000032034797,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014072204,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99931675},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385394055","doi":"10.1515/9781553394495-012","title":"The Legal Duty to Consult and Canada’s Approach to Aboriginal Consultation and Accommodation","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"McGill-Queen's University Press eBooks","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Accommodation; Duty; Reasonable accommodation; Law; Political science; Psychology","score_opus":0.012460491332992197,"score_gpt":0.2329669783091944,"score_spread":0.2205064869762022,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385394055","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00024070143,0.0000022908393,0.00013428136,0.002710043,0.0001873686,0.0007193355,0.0003613232,0.000051385214,0.99559325],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.021018777,0.00025372827,0.00012593987,0.00024326655,0.00013137782,0.0000034269162,0.000013758294,0.000018359036,0.9781914],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987193,0.00008473189,0.00015121019,0.00038313083,0.000401016,0.00026061415],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988475,0.00022503133,0.00013646977,0.00019095922,0.00029666547,0.00030339375],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00024255658,0.0002057415,0.00020546163,0.00008961047,0.0017418049,0.00012489388,0.00021699676,0.00018977126,0.0000057767443],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000037241112,0.00018041611,0.000032172615,0.000013573304,0.00027750368,0.00013739029,0.00012090696,0.00018087949,0.0000017469362],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010556775,0.0000031328339,0.000007192426,0.0000098568735,0.000040580213,0.0000069553994,0.00093541056,0.0000013234652,0.0000040120863,0.98765254,0.0027416442,0.008491774],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035665347,0.000029230217,0.00013531878,0.00004756939,0.000064382875,0.0000010989523,0.0004956189,0.0000030865851,0.000012341983,0.00017456178,0.9984354,0.00024474703],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5478886,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.055276483,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99569374,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00038483427,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004300746,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995578},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385512612","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.3257","title":"Has the CJPTA readied Canada for the Hague Choice of Court Convention?","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Convention; Law; Jurisdiction; Supreme court; Political science; Choice of law; Conflict of laws; Selection (genetic algorithm); Computer science","score_opus":0.057148745656535785,"score_gpt":0.3242584069041801,"score_spread":0.26710966124764435,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385512612","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009385546,0.001113772,0.003335067,0.12883902,0.0055154017,0.00083219615,0.000054887863,0.000033797638,0.85089034],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99491036,0.00009003207,0.00006517302,0.0006019748,0.0019066511,0.00000392648,0.0000011327563,0.000007935645,0.0024128342],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988493,0.00012789204,0.00024518912,0.00009133838,0.00043368535,0.00025262084],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986357,0.00044526777,0.00024605874,0.00016845798,0.00041240262,0.00009208754],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013141107,0.0000734896,0.00011208628,0.000012084063,0.0034674222,0.00017121024,0.00040578548,0.000049437993,0.00038469833],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014887734,0.000042553926,0.00010131582,0.00008939326,0.00064567843,0.00011527357,0.000022304392,0.00016785406,0.0000035520711],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004803418,0.00003438331,0.00061435404,0.000005629021,0.00012298329,0.0000017752699,0.0042280243,0.000009249674,0.000119916054,0.9390817,0.05012937,0.005604566],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034387477,0.000069606314,0.0026705374,0.000022972883,0.00006319223,0.00000907091,0.0023625924,0.00014824283,0.00018879151,0.008016132,0.9860384,0.00006658662],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.955873,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99832296,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9855248,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009446422,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00057529163,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9978299},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385594139","doi":"10.59962/9780774836340-026","title":"22 Appointment to the Quebec Court of Appeal, 1979","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Law; Political science; Psychology","score_opus":0.02211660874165503,"score_gpt":0.22547751815885028,"score_spread":0.20336090941719526,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385594139","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0008069484,0.00017505216,0.00004613897,0.00027548827,0.00027548114,0.00076170336,0.00042679106,0.000038764276,0.99719363],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.016248383,0.00040697106,0.000054929864,0.000045747205,0.00015641811,7.558252e-7,0.000010086724,0.000015433718,0.98306125],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99866897,0.000053130527,0.00019193404,0.00029531957,0.0005774227,0.00021321245],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985931,0.000048262482,0.00044041948,0.00047061042,0.00030627596,0.00014135342],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00036621268,0.00010138543,0.00036537676,0.00003416558,0.00083897234,0.00017970178,0.00086410803,0.00025758424,0.0005699328],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001600017,0.0001933307,0.00022745259,0.000004661199,0.00090028543,0.000070864226,0.00029557565,0.00019731482,0.000009798565],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006841359,0.00006606403,0.000047821602,0.0001367114,0.00037183793,0.00013024599,0.012312162,0.0000043037453,0.000009456354,0.050732113,0.4885058,0.44761506],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002688834,0.0000671484,0.000546397,0.00044889486,0.000126024,0.0000023218022,0.00047905633,0.0000019237664,0.0000013694944,0.0007002624,0.9971732,0.0001845454],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.93044674,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9741317,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.50866735,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013584181,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003342891,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7883797},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385735616","doi":"10.4337/9781839107108.00015","title":"References","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Edward Elgar Publishing eBooks","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Office on Violence Against Women; Vlaamse regering; Central European University; University of Toronto; Queen's University; European Commission; Queen's University Belfast; Vlaams Instituut voor de Zee; University of Cambridge; Government of Canada; United Nations Development Programme; Australian Government; Directorate-General for Justice; McGill University; University of Oxford; Harvard University; World Bank Group; U.S. Department of Justice","keywords":"Corporate governance; Political science; Rule of law; Law; Public administration; Sociology; Politics; Management; Economics","score_opus":0.07057174785323456,"score_gpt":0.2950307274783182,"score_spread":0.22445897962508365,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385735616","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000031302854,0.00010498011,0.000014731941,0.0031914946,0.0037904398,0.00028773848,0.000040289502,0.0010361051,0.99150294],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0025125814,0.00020869981,0.00007064216,0.0003579215,0.0038127047,0.00001765356,0.00006603189,0.00009634246,0.9928574],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99719447,0.00007236681,0.00041207895,0.00055429566,0.0012348999,0.000531868],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984214,0.0002510608,0.0003167105,0.0004210436,0.00030955242,0.00028028234],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017604845,0.00031322078,0.0003893664,0.0003371995,0.0008737211,0.0026303243,0.0008362719,0.0009182383,0.00097078085],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00044248925,0.00032424534,0.00025099833,0.000049590395,0.00034020466,0.00065938587,0.00020847442,0.00097141956,0.0007592375],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005585646,0.0000026217967,0.0000089442265,0.000013983674,0.000052636657,0.000017681812,0.0042144954,1.6603914e-7,0.000001432824,0.8027871,0.1093835,0.083511844],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000089193105,0.000025510375,0.000037915677,0.00017055901,0.000038052814,8.1840204e-7,0.000272261,0.0000012526726,0.0000023870614,0.094251215,0.9047711,0.00033976408],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031876294,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010290865,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.79538757,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020507083,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006796769,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999425},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385745318","doi":"10.59962/9780774819657","title":"Transforming Law’s Family","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Genealogy; Political science; History","score_opus":0.026407515907544286,"score_gpt":0.2091663398537894,"score_spread":0.18275882394624512,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385745318","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00080364215,0.00031189117,0.000058667625,0.000005409752,0.00029115542,0.00046397714,0.00030062572,0.00012655646,0.99763805],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0049689217,0.000715999,0.00009292485,0.0000404767,0.0001496795,5.0005787e-7,0.000019447574,0.00002208955,0.99398994],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987077,0.00007674094,0.00017773738,0.00031652022,0.00042942664,0.00029188677],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99919575,0.00003986542,0.00019512282,0.00019604941,0.0002159161,0.00015728608],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002420792,0.000099938334,0.0003528248,0.000032213262,0.0006556559,0.00013360672,0.00049574213,0.00048424833,0.00045284693],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000004000365,0.00027205673,0.00024932055,0.000011937136,0.0010342082,0.00015260906,0.00008095244,0.00028023226,0.0000067652363],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006942953,0.00012301886,0.000028392136,0.00034705707,0.00040248732,0.0005787287,0.038649958,4.376365e-7,0.000033666867,0.124462344,0.4388878,0.39641666],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00036161992,0.000046458343,0.000086420536,0.00037959506,0.0001388578,0.000003316934,0.0006699657,6.372985e-7,0.0000015590565,0.0020236971,0.99602133,0.00026654298],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.88483995,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8989562,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5571335,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016165386,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005182434,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999732},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385860639","doi":"10.59962/9780774855150","title":"The Courts","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.016236545961310123,"score_gpt":0.21948270470363448,"score_spread":0.20324615874232435,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385860639","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0003320819,0.0005018614,0.000028084709,0.000030151936,0.0004183209,0.00035862473,0.00012376906,0.000077287215,0.99812984],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0009593464,0.0013251309,0.000028909943,0.00002376847,0.00024330038,2.1174833e-7,0.000009712074,0.00001381989,0.9973958],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986734,0.00008406759,0.00015141709,0.00022923914,0.0005696086,0.00029231637],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99891555,0.00018460627,0.00024804022,0.00022721483,0.00029890076,0.00012566039],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005787877,0.0000715005,0.00021442561,0.000021613929,0.0013697135,0.00026719534,0.0005618322,0.00036427754,0.0001866685],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000019289211,0.00015446554,0.00017568203,0.0000108230715,0.0013483173,0.000057706857,0.00013370038,0.0002779727,0.000005340821],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015133362,0.000014285984,0.000017901559,0.000023786457,0.00008044703,0.00012803196,0.0021377474,1.9875618e-7,4.735457e-7,0.009703837,0.77333635,0.21454182],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002128359,0.000024504487,0.00030933204,0.00016545427,0.00007093219,0.0000036542178,0.00045277583,0.0000014550818,2.0090553e-7,0.0017242328,0.9968768,0.00015783796],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5922947,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8878549,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.29556018,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019556734,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00055935245,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999304},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385864729","doi":"10.59962/9780774817769-018","title":"Strategic <i>Charter</i> Litigation and the Right to Communicate in Canada","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Political science; Business; Public administration; Law","score_opus":0.014879469001190141,"score_gpt":0.18973252159759302,"score_spread":0.17485305259640288,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385864729","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.027527198,0.0001215306,0.0000017106782,0.00029019435,0.0001254877,0.0005063432,0.00018459167,0.000015081292,0.9712279],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.38136768,0.00060218945,0.00004208557,0.0001270848,0.000049950446,8.689417e-7,0.000011777301,0.000011192029,0.6177872],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99914986,0.000086421045,0.0001483719,0.0001846706,0.00027600463,0.00015465339],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999303,0.000104450475,0.0001471129,0.00022191952,0.00011535523,0.00010819546],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00029275712,0.00006894571,0.0002462256,0.000021551452,0.00042841444,0.00013363587,0.00038749634,0.0001700147,0.00018653838],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000005263028,0.00012769266,0.000048919974,0.00000867978,0.00068720133,0.00005086221,0.00014104163,0.00035817368,7.4058363e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00042953735,0.000078546655,0.0007598511,0.0003198568,0.00042707263,0.00086621114,0.056997377,0.0000080937325,0.00009787004,0.6879658,0.039404977,0.21264479],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007441093,0.000014813366,0.0006023649,0.00023685333,0.000042812004,0.0000038633593,0.0008590999,0.000008785418,0.0000012648431,0.007543847,0.98976696,0.00017520713],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9994647,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.999978,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.950362,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00014954283,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00062480156,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.52071553},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385984866","doi":"10.4324/9781003193104-15","title":"International Cooperation and Harmonization in Public Enforcement of the Japanese Competition Law","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Harmonization; Enforcement; Competition law; Competition (biology); International trade; Business; Law enforcement; Law and economics; Political science; Law; Economics; Market economy","score_opus":0.04309322426642152,"score_gpt":0.2786074781034288,"score_spread":0.23551425383700725,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385984866","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0003276225,0.000011523463,0.0000385257,0.003457739,0.00052134786,0.0002511025,0.000013704621,0.000028748394,0.9953497],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6903984,0.00054167956,0.000006749128,0.0001292605,0.00012789654,0.000005948227,0.0000890857,0.000008252554,0.30869272],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99924326,0.00002633705,0.0002094564,0.00011929143,0.0003320083,0.00006965414],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99958926,0.000033980832,0.000112849004,0.000074283635,0.00016598594,0.000023623707],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00031833947,0.00006957597,0.000088384215,0.00008337068,0.00015072284,0.00007546469,0.000105172716,0.00012311053,0.0014274538],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000026188129,0.000057202018,0.000030895644,0.00005228246,0.00016442289,0.00015570805,0.000053266496,0.00008589077,0.000008645548],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000025048812,0.0000057158763,0.00007240449,0.0000048437078,0.000009764037,1.8053429e-7,0.0019186734,0.000007676336,0.000013973529,0.9965505,0.0001095263,0.0013042251],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022789823,0.000017694134,0.00042153487,0.00009088405,0.000011891265,3.5037536e-7,0.00047467096,0.00033165794,0.000018342764,0.008632485,0.9896672,0.00010538968],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035243449,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02331551,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9895577,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009452903,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000055328164,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994854},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386089148","doi":"10.1017/9781108866477.001","title":"Table of Cases","year":2023,"lang":"pl","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Table (database); Computer science; Information retrieval; Content (measure theory); Database; Table of contents; World Wide Web; Mathematics","score_opus":0.0400005313357244,"score_gpt":0.3222967439980128,"score_spread":0.2822962126622884,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386089148","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00047566136,0.00031680852,0.000015006769,0.00038540093,0.0013751045,0.0001743666,0.000042614858,0.00020207734,0.997013],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.018913329,0.0022183617,0.00002825172,0.0000356059,0.00063632947,0.0000046578884,0.0000029357607,0.00012442889,0.9780361],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989622,0.000048670747,0.00021388596,0.00020409777,0.00034242624,0.00022866797],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99934095,0.00018388784,0.00017724739,0.00016459693,0.000060962353,0.000072377974],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.000278298,0.0001242991,0.00027027456,0.000102385005,0.00012725225,0.000029729597,0.00016249713,0.0002627029,0.069562644],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000098086304,0.0001124086,0.00010382429,0.0004374074,0.00019245718,0.000051032024,0.000041241678,0.00008156493,0.0016569714],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019180005,0.00019751464,0.0031041799,0.00016941702,0.00026232068,0.00007087019,0.007905862,0.0000037365448,0.00007533354,0.14801788,0.7860206,0.054153092],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008150254,0.000054097858,0.00044329496,0.000115021365,0.000038068552,7.9212555e-7,0.0013410508,0.0000066978596,0.000036838715,0.00008662333,0.9976675,0.00012851825],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.091830745,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09189408,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2116469,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002543537,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016517482,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99912035},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386546524","doi":"10.1017/cyl.2023.6","title":"Canadian Cases in Private International Law in 2022","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Yearbook of international Law/Annuaire canadien de droit international","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Conflict of laws; Content (measure theory); Law; Business; Link (geometry); Political science; Law and economics; Internet privacy; Computer science; Sociology; Mathematics; Computer network","score_opus":0.011934730073365147,"score_gpt":0.2677654424157692,"score_spread":0.25583071234240407,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386546524","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.26397866,0.00003788444,0.0000042208803,0.018431444,0.0031669592,0.00031571486,0.0009793759,0.000054726195,0.713031],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98041755,0.00013448868,0.00007324038,0.0020741036,0.00062195316,0.00007194268,0.00043567634,0.000035647256,0.016135398],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99706286,0.00009706771,0.0006302201,0.00047045253,0.0008303478,0.00090903125],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981137,0.00016024194,0.00016215979,0.00022946036,0.00043298202,0.00090144755],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001090417,0.00021641812,0.00025357638,0.0021397246,0.00022339505,0.00016809221,0.0013595535,0.00025172136,0.0023124004],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00047561,0.00030302184,0.00013396898,0.0006298482,0.00031132964,0.00057758,0.00007680369,0.0003889652,0.00013223635],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028507617,0.000027256356,0.057112947,0.0000049071195,0.0000806467,0.001279795,0.0026491433,0.00027972576,0.000033696826,0.933868,0.0031853388,0.0014500368],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00064397906,0.000030855557,0.04922763,0.00017319614,0.0000072891476,0.000048960428,0.0012092312,0.0012758665,0.00004898672,0.013236108,0.93373126,0.0003666633],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99038506,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99975044,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9305459,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010748807,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031798845,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999422},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387067447","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4576144","title":"Does a Refusal of Treatment need to be Informed? Towards a Resolution of the Current Confusion in English, Canadian and Australian Common Law","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Atlantic School of Theology","funders":"","keywords":"Confusion; Current (fluid); Law; Common law; Resolution (logic); Political science; Psychology; Engineering; Computer science; Psychoanalysis","score_opus":0.02293978546494002,"score_gpt":0.3158380909988425,"score_spread":0.2928983055339025,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387067447","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9845624,0.00008727112,7.551425e-7,0.012495021,0.00033543457,0.00022390408,0.000012796067,0.000009856472,0.0022725454],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99694115,0.0023578587,0.0000021683247,0.00003312251,0.00010512585,0.000004744585,0.0000026005507,0.0000037966206,0.00054945686],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99861366,0.00010465011,0.0002320609,0.000076328055,0.00021611893,0.00075719884],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99959755,0.000027045578,0.0000986107,0.00007764212,0.000078154146,0.000120980505],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010285864,0.00006758766,0.00013024219,0.0001579219,0.00026378833,0.000024141658,0.00012256419,0.00005222152,0.000009610208],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005697285,0.00004039527,0.000051747767,0.0003906341,0.00010667194,0.00009665155,0.000021811678,0.00032936706,4.868333e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019429681,0.000102472724,0.03174165,0.000025380295,0.0000841489,0.0000022057793,0.14152831,0.000091725255,0.0005375455,0.57047457,0.00043730318,0.2547804],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0012014656,0.0009707334,0.059944604,0.00016518452,0.00004439478,0.000004346775,0.03733413,0.000048725007,0.0003387301,0.020956205,0.87881505,0.00017641859],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.49622577,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98357064,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87837774,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016515765,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003831671,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.679722},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387616837","doi":"10.4324/9781003315926-15","title":"Winds of Change in Common Law Jurisdictions","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Uniwersytet Jagielloński w Krakowie","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.12775045332078735,"score_gpt":0.35558995092702883,"score_spread":0.22783949760624148,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387616837","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00015705789,0.00009049894,0.0000024242029,0.001582423,0.00057824975,0.00028329674,0.000037186895,0.00013709262,0.99713176],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.09481923,0.001318711,0.000013265725,0.00022802815,0.0006286778,0.000021577676,0.000029954332,0.000034053905,0.9029065],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989434,0.000024226587,0.00030434236,0.00018385949,0.00036003816,0.0001841489],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994783,0.000084744795,0.00012570817,0.00018220863,0.0000610977,0.00006798296],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00038046142,0.00012615944,0.00029056563,0.00020515065,0.0001699153,0.00002033873,0.00015940446,0.00036773027,0.001520134],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000038322287,0.00013263506,0.00012446745,0.00009102547,0.0002708655,0.0001063014,0.000052896605,0.00023165774,0.00015657321],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000033785354,0.000012100976,0.00015451491,0.00000944488,0.000013216868,0.000004599375,0.0055711777,2.0938765e-7,0.0000012470583,0.9872455,0.00054207473,0.0064425613],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010546009,0.000037760998,0.00096023147,0.00011999979,0.000021662761,2.0713622e-7,0.00014882114,0.0000051860584,0.0000033996666,0.04057692,0.9578766,0.00014372301],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.037010577,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2918317,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9573346,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008261736,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006575723,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993926},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387698691","doi":"10.32782/2524-0374/2023-9/72","title":"RECOGNITION AND ENFORCEMENT OF DECISIONS OF FOREIGN COURTS IN CIVIL CASES IN CANADA","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Juridical scientific and electronic journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Enforcement; Law; Political science; Business; Criminology; Psychology","score_opus":0.03668277065668941,"score_gpt":0.28246599564490976,"score_spread":0.24578322498822036,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387698691","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9967921,0.00039530327,0.000022634991,0.00037844304,0.00012777039,0.00007801607,0.000008853183,0.0000027585993,0.0021941492],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99755293,0.002283432,0.0000046841974,0.000011044214,0.00002730249,0.0000018980923,0.000004614811,0.0000020383095,0.00011207428],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99874395,0.00007545903,0.00029507713,0.00011620588,0.00040069554,0.00036862827],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994997,0.00019947073,0.00009470647,0.000040277926,0.00005612219,0.000109714296],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020748682,0.00004546618,0.0001251549,0.00019065126,0.00022469359,0.0000386185,0.00006474482,0.000034957688,0.00018837195],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021732692,0.00003994317,0.000021356751,0.00046938125,0.00018010403,0.00010178671,0.000023751749,0.00016766523,5.8155786e-7],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003693806,0.00034637915,0.13561432,0.000071368726,0.00006838599,0.00021445657,0.016864361,0.00019527953,0.0018607022,0.12669179,0.009876296,0.70782727],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0054750163,0.0011132461,0.23732819,0.001264566,0.00009656249,0.00024437165,0.04200563,0.003713599,0.0016409138,0.48754835,0.21875189,0.0008176571],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4218862,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9524827,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7070096,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00027370988,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023739424,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5819635},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388094158","doi":"10.5539/ass.v19n6p53","title":"Research on Relevant Issues Regarding the Creditor’s Right of Revocation in the Chinese Civil Code","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Asian Social Science","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Revocation; Creditor; Debtor; Civil code; Business; Law and economics; Enforcement; Debt; Law; Subrogation; Political science; Economics; Actuarial science; Finance; Computer science","score_opus":0.05659898153777028,"score_gpt":0.4369740911129814,"score_spread":0.38037510957521115,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388094158","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1665244,0.000045269302,0.0000051641277,0.08463609,0.0009420886,0.00037914605,0.000004134959,0.000053084776,0.74741066],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971276,0.00013373137,0.000005936771,0.000082694976,0.0017855209,0.00002340386,0.0000010306901,0.0000040341138,0.00083604665],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99661714,0.00064767816,0.0001831714,0.00023600564,0.0018974681,0.0004185093],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99895245,0.00047988317,0.00007997335,0.00021977501,0.0002265225,0.000041426614],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014803598,0.00006068238,0.000097144286,0.00019651731,0.0029312845,0.00017191352,0.0009619609,0.000064284155,0.00003409994],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011825712,0.000034985092,0.000047205933,0.0055903657,0.0019433092,0.00022807396,0.000080433754,0.00028056427,0.000045343986],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002310041,0.00005609657,0.002373845,0.000008646729,0.0000038179883,0.0000063531097,0.31828794,0.0000032133994,0.0011265172,0.5981531,0.03383804,0.04611929],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014655732,0.00007310171,0.5313121,0.00005380868,0.0000036253277,3.7739628e-7,0.091813274,0.0000535683,0.000132617,0.028596122,0.34770757,0.00010728058],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028448426,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0065135485,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8306032,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015480543,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00028918774,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9983668},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388175518","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780199250080.001.0001","title":"Reform and Development of Private International Law","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Conflict of laws; Private law; Comity; Law; Political science; International law; Comparative law; Common law; Sociology; Jurisdiction","score_opus":0.03346444341505439,"score_gpt":0.286945276979848,"score_spread":0.2534808335647936,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388175518","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00010808067,0.000060167684,0.00004339888,0.0003332366,0.00022597633,0.000073013565,0.0000027548392,0.000022696819,0.99913067],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0019931525,0.0002943783,0.0012198251,0.000075992626,0.00018378285,0.000002239101,0.000014015738,0.000005232426,0.9962114],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99937665,0.0000059985805,0.00016696555,0.0000972648,0.0002796963,0.0000734291],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99975425,0.000010955612,0.00009020694,0.000049333306,0.00005687259,0.000038385675],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00017121813,0.000059682374,0.000095486226,0.000038368406,0.0001269143,0.000023215161,0.000104651124,0.00011659959,0.0015165611],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000035735607,0.000052703777,0.000020458056,0.00001249686,0.0001291257,0.00006173797,0.000047814454,0.000060914048,0.00002228087],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000020412738,0.000009178611,0.000013303229,0.0000088888755,0.000029578065,5.106523e-7,0.0054736547,1.3875148e-8,0.0000026393607,0.950674,0.0020596066,0.041726574],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000060894334,0.000005621636,0.000077178156,0.000031755062,0.0000033898361,2.034798e-7,0.00010978053,0.0000011123777,0.00002064183,0.0020249754,0.9975994,0.000065025815],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003924824,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0028741756,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99553984,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026767564,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014096039,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993962},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388175659","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780199243396.001.0001","title":"Res Judicata, Estoppel, and Foreign Judgments","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":156,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Res judicata; Law; Estoppel; Jurisdiction; Political science; Statutory law; Civil procedure; Context (archaeology); Doctrine; History","score_opus":0.026572777567814107,"score_gpt":0.2985802656244782,"score_spread":0.2720074880566641,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388175659","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00009976622,0.00052993227,0.00004964313,0.00095293176,0.00021209232,0.0002565648,0.000008508827,0.00010566658,0.9977849],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00140967,0.003945445,0.00008968838,0.00037543912,0.0007562951,0.000008192331,0.000030130997,0.000017181244,0.99336797],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99886805,0.000033577642,0.00017362449,0.00027431824,0.00040098833,0.0002494425],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994618,0.000063768086,0.00010069465,0.00016856576,0.000050751398,0.00015441295],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003256854,0.00014205372,0.00019686196,0.00008805678,0.0004311318,0.000104603074,0.00016386573,0.00024842317,0.0020758233],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002628667,0.00013554293,0.000060439135,0.000051451854,0.00027378494,0.00011754309,0.000060576258,0.00016821167,0.00013318403],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008034198,0.000016990356,0.0004926143,0.0000138869445,0.000034174052,0.000012088268,0.0010769059,5.9355376e-8,0.0000010619814,0.42672068,0.53241676,0.039206762],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011304674,0.000026923197,0.00025234852,0.000040376955,0.00003093383,0.0000013752034,0.00018611642,0.0000014293067,0.0000011524966,0.033361893,0.96582484,0.00015955023],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002617378,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0033304144,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4334081,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012930937,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002982063,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988364},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388175754","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780199250080.003.0003","title":"Reform Of Private International Law By Judges: Canada As A Case Study","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Law; Political science; Conflict of laws; Legislative process; Common law","score_opus":0.023869414797512114,"score_gpt":0.28149691261571935,"score_spread":0.25762749781820726,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388175754","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0055656726,0.000048222937,0.0000014458068,0.00076768495,0.000443141,0.00028773918,0.000052515556,0.0000276519,0.9928059],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.31040302,0.00012925446,0.0000084833,0.000266304,0.00016359154,0.000004039189,0.00001223514,0.000011927498,0.68900114],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99867857,0.000014404938,0.00028683257,0.00020220177,0.0006845768,0.00013340697],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99939114,0.000024572162,0.00017949224,0.0001669419,0.00014163459,0.00009624577],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00018806051,0.00013445193,0.00019361828,0.000041260773,0.0002006603,0.00003567049,0.00021610761,0.0001270722,0.0094314935],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000075015378,0.0001216953,0.00005945271,0.000019972582,0.00011531992,0.00008230588,0.000058908576,0.00014469746,0.000017717512],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005386747,0.000051035942,0.000058026384,0.0000039371216,0.0001194667,0.0005018165,0.002612596,9.8632704e-8,8.036382e-7,0.98496974,0.009718792,0.0019582922],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016967331,0.000071733855,0.000004394367,0.00001430783,0.000028293443,0.000028021192,0.0038235022,0.000002328682,0.0000041432163,0.0010918392,0.9946212,0.00014051984],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98629004,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9926173,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98490244,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006479707,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024416612,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99147403},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388850007","doi":"10.24908/cmj.v23i2.16959","title":"After Arbour — “Reimagining” RMC","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Military Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","keywords":"Art","score_opus":0.01528573848852906,"score_gpt":0.28191235358199157,"score_spread":0.2666266150934625,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388850007","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.77012247,0.0021302106,0.000023871575,0.07392924,0.004051692,0.00016302598,0.00004558722,0.00014336711,0.1493905],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9878381,0.0006456559,0.000051116884,0.0012870004,0.0016386356,0.000004670311,0.000003816401,0.000011638453,0.0085193785],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99882835,0.00009762758,0.00015292947,0.00011737583,0.00025624287,0.00054749375],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987911,0.000031533258,0.000020611664,0.000098986704,0.000087481494,0.0009702722],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00082617515,0.00007266723,0.00008540327,0.000310612,0.00087040756,0.00006568582,0.00017762135,0.00006749773,0.0031102232],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009885659,0.00006661833,0.00008581807,0.00038381875,0.00012513652,0.00024421085,0.000010087042,0.00031185488,0.0005823424],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000054086704,0.000024321858,0.13042744,0.0000143128145,0.00011888863,0.0040236516,0.10006965,0.000092946815,0.00005535225,0.006515503,0.6172497,0.14135411],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009687164,0.000015380914,0.10222153,0.000015401207,0.0000071893173,0.000023416202,0.0031161094,0.00005409525,7.0487e-7,0.002051971,0.8923022,0.00009513838],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.28714573,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8050868,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.51794106,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00029704924,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014365162,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99780107},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389333524","doi":"10.7202/1105874ar","title":"IMPLICIT COMPARATIVE LAW","year":2013,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue de droit Université de Sherbrooke","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Oxford; University of Cambridge; McGill University; Louisiana State University","keywords":"Law; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.016513483265602508,"score_gpt":0.2422702281938782,"score_spread":0.2257567449282757,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389333524","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.30605686,0.0019146032,0.0004138594,0.0058322097,0.0005933738,0.0003269512,0.000016460395,0.00008443489,0.6847612],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6208991,0.00085138367,0.0003668928,0.00062408164,0.00058970903,0.0000062234344,0.000008219649,0.000018200888,0.37663624],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984089,0.00015852181,0.00020021576,0.00032646116,0.00019441653,0.00071145536],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99897254,0.00009292133,0.000121286364,0.00024731728,0.0001364058,0.00042952332],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00023612737,0.00019464215,0.0003043444,0.00006470645,0.0007935631,0.00010267296,0.00035134944,0.0003137159,0.0054036533],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000006229813,0.00027305676,0.00020634723,0.00034593727,0.00048383707,0.0004842348,0.00011648658,0.00028078115,0.0016644163],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019793919,0.00008903281,0.0014274542,0.00006895914,0.000088747474,0.00005052616,0.020685008,0.0000857822,0.0014721598,0.957794,0.011393956,0.006824543],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00041955916,0.00010455616,0.007748629,0.00015694452,0.0001082633,0.00004282412,0.0031955978,0.0013610863,0.0004711274,0.014747713,0.9713287,0.00031504],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.031858396,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013366495,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9599347,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031722486,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001237161,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99997216},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389355543","doi":"10.7202/1105714ar","title":"LE RÉGIME QUÉBÉCOIS D’ASSURANCE PARENTALE : UN SYSTÈME DISCRIMINATOIRE À L’ENDROIT DES ENFANTS ADOPTÉS","year":2016,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue de droit Université de Sherbrooke","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal; Ministère de l’Emploi et de la Solidarité Sociale (Québec); Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.009513186058202143,"score_gpt":0.21325177859630465,"score_spread":0.2037385925381025,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389355543","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.67618287,0.012969192,0.0032652672,0.010923829,0.0013567015,0.00044427998,0.00018528159,0.00024619032,0.29442638],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.83090377,0.006748061,0.000273914,0.00009033866,0.00040392496,0.0000068101335,0.0000073943274,0.000047693105,0.16151811],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99726325,0.0002615935,0.00035096833,0.0006174795,0.00036521052,0.0011414988],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99844575,0.00016017184,0.00023493363,0.00044961646,0.00013240779,0.00057711866],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00046071422,0.00033862967,0.00044374555,0.0001333719,0.0013760631,0.00007224437,0.0006394563,0.00042778405,0.0011065125],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000076292374,0.00038931752,0.00036282017,0.00051403453,0.00101997,0.0007371052,0.00019562,0.0002193878,0.0002783286],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013225037,0.00030639145,0.029190453,0.00047231358,0.00020492285,0.0005714007,0.02457878,0.000023128257,0.0026443263,0.6871099,0.0009193781,0.25384676],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0018473356,0.00021658927,0.054386705,0.0031231553,0.00036651397,0.00029587589,0.007366083,0.0001737658,0.0042286725,0.018987762,0.9081195,0.00088806526],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05211578,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13983671,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9072001,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006026258,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00074465113,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999924},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389612478","doi":"10.4337/9781800889866.00046","title":"Right of recourse against third parties","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Edward Elgar Publishing eBooks","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Computer science; Law and economics; Economics","score_opus":0.038970532001059995,"score_gpt":0.27488210162930415,"score_spread":0.23591156962824417,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389612478","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00030824883,0.00015264376,0.000010294405,0.0022777244,0.0034622308,0.00033247974,0.000069427624,0.0005437369,0.9928432],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0047732405,0.00030438963,0.00009895969,0.0002688652,0.0019052491,0.000017258026,0.00006358146,0.000095069634,0.99247336],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99718183,0.00008955358,0.000608251,0.00046491734,0.0011603293,0.0004951353],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980114,0.00026468036,0.0005796081,0.00048386405,0.00042902096,0.00023139575],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002063351,0.00031768085,0.0005366304,0.00035131973,0.0005653321,0.00096890563,0.0007268702,0.00083902816,0.00037118833],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00042477014,0.00032155172,0.0003566635,0.000055089884,0.0005252927,0.00065287173,0.00018468752,0.00081271573,0.00017181308],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017936545,0.000010339534,0.00002982488,0.00005493769,0.00014505307,0.000026130578,0.009299416,0.0000020217078,0.000011210198,0.79253983,0.1551336,0.04272972],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013776704,0.000033305605,0.00003803859,0.00033888518,0.00005917939,4.6386558e-7,0.00042867803,0.000004360038,0.000033777927,0.038130004,0.9604635,0.000331993],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014496634,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0059854626,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.80533,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016433926,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00073751947,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99992365},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389703888","doi":"10.1017/9780511843280.012","title":"Cambridge Studies in International and Comparative Law","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Content (measure theory); Political science; Link (geometry); Law; Computer science; Law and economics; Information retrieval; Mathematics; Sociology; Computer network","score_opus":0.1774137959823022,"score_gpt":0.4383854440602534,"score_spread":0.26097164807795126,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389703888","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0001509512,0.0004999705,0.0000015313633,0.00080531416,0.000829922,0.00009699964,0.000008591438,0.00016223275,0.9974445],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.020108592,0.0028888094,0.000022442233,0.00008426809,0.00037540274,0.000009277945,0.0000021262817,0.00003217596,0.9764769],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995963,0.000028550076,0.00006502825,0.0001076175,0.00012972554,0.00007278278],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998414,0.000057482455,0.000032770065,0.00003079918,0.000018122124,0.000019422769],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00013379696,0.000053643966,0.000120804936,0.00007750914,0.000048409896,0.000021944372,0.00005280606,0.00006154331,0.0003516642],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000011266215,0.000047901398,0.0000133555595,0.00006294877,0.00024111403,0.000033032607,0.000031151307,0.000050523344,0.000057228415],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000017560953,0.00000869611,0.00039842253,0.0000045197185,0.000057924117,0.0000046718305,0.010908131,7.968791e-8,2.9790868e-7,0.58958745,0.3983013,0.00072674616],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008002246,0.0000044709077,0.00046743406,0.00005689615,0.000002942524,8.888558e-8,0.00777167,0.0000026010468,4.2189617e-7,0.0001156992,0.99144214,0.000055584063],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.050103884,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4838318,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5931409,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000045807512,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000015019999,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9562216},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390279131","doi":"10.18356/9789213584712c002","title":"No. 53597. Canada and Israel","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"United Nations Treaty Series","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Geography; Political science","score_opus":0.022014136884480395,"score_gpt":0.2501456423061326,"score_spread":0.22813150542165223,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390279131","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00027986753,0.000100487705,0.0000013049116,0.0035642516,0.00052322395,0.00018167861,0.00032532171,0.00017633189,0.99484754],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0008015562,0.003659078,0.00003608441,0.00013651265,0.00032366673,0.000010224558,0.00037424787,0.000028785576,0.99462986],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990964,0.00002413019,0.00017054453,0.0001939214,0.00034900408,0.0001660072],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99907213,0.0001974775,0.000092004164,0.00014196621,0.00038862694,0.00010777391],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000114784256,0.0001601668,0.00016122093,0.0011097325,0.0009483577,0.000093640636,0.00009926514,0.00020846415,0.00030422577],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017685576,0.00016993044,0.000041228286,0.00047586233,0.0002353626,0.00014716819,0.00003275911,0.00016198431,0.000065805565],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000063376087,0.000003539738,0.000070016475,0.000010139554,0.000049660208,0.000011599366,0.0009456638,0.0000012579393,6.442058e-7,0.97384155,0.023532426,0.0015271659],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008562788,0.000021751886,0.00022451866,0.000045225177,0.000047524238,0.0000012513316,0.0006294832,0.0000034870097,0.0000013351175,0.002957238,0.9958103,0.00017230921],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8853443,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9955234,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9722778,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016070814,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006691862,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.72940964},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390460676","doi":"10.54783/endlessjournal.v6i3.230","title":"Problems Faced by Duty to Consult and the Protection of Aboriginal Peoples in Canada","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"ENDLESS International Journal of Future Studies","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Doctrine; Indigenous; Duty; Law; Constitution; Legislature; Political science; Government (linguistics); Governor; Engineering","score_opus":0.01650022742376678,"score_gpt":0.3327897669708928,"score_spread":0.316289539547126,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390460676","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94913775,0.0015924021,0.000037622678,0.046467274,0.001993888,0.00019506089,0.000020421421,0.0000053784624,0.0005501831],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99380535,0.005445247,0.000020545507,0.000075654534,0.00047862504,0.0000110014025,6.5422483e-7,0.0000026252042,0.00016028149],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989419,0.00009483102,0.00027194218,0.00006417708,0.0005330281,0.00009410673],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99906516,0.0001790966,0.00021092274,0.000028242022,0.00048397266,0.000032612665],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00070762425,0.000056457702,0.00016440787,0.00009531749,0.00011900212,0.00002301157,0.00015822105,0.000019593508,0.000008667713],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022953098,0.000036901285,0.000030081195,0.00020915011,0.000118094445,0.00008993191,0.000026312016,0.00011651249,3.950649e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.002108168,0.00017387728,0.118348286,0.00016055138,0.002054934,0.00008905096,0.628473,0.002139896,0.0025687516,0.08360222,0.056054007,0.104227245],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0031796177,0.000113903465,0.09047723,0.00037295316,0.00004000155,0.000019858164,0.26612186,0.00006772543,0.000494599,0.0013010395,0.6376264,0.00018482654],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.30982158,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.87143725,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5815724,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00021323105,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00047488866,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6947744},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390495711","doi":"10.1139/cjb-2023-0122","title":"Note of appreciation","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Botany","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Biology; Botany","score_opus":0.017861977744421404,"score_gpt":0.3198275394416241,"score_spread":0.30196556169720273,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390495711","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3865617,0.0015887093,0.00338662,0.004329677,0.0016621309,0.00015197447,0.0000070647334,0.00020926767,0.6021029],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9961383,0.00010656197,0.000091809954,0.000018386616,0.00026302924,0.0000016360685,1.8863163e-7,0.0000023340522,0.0033777687],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99968207,0.000018585199,0.00006038742,0.00005262163,0.00012875529,0.000057588146],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998746,0.000036416594,0.000012594226,0.000037504324,0.00002060931,0.000018266235],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00021964806,0.000018676703,0.00003218685,0.000020983725,0.00005505362,0.000024800802,0.000034279226,0.00003017329,0.00018238538],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000029351235,0.00001799462,0.000027543132,0.0001241887,0.000028682032,0.000074542564,0.0000050929975,0.000025775911,0.000040541414],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007667357,0.000028266997,0.00093235035,0.00002432792,0.000016290736,0.0000034393022,0.030065078,0.0000032309695,0.010999247,0.45567232,0.0055673905,0.49668038],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002313724,0.000009028903,0.0059560635,0.000018338204,0.0000058704477,1.13866186e-7,0.0001884937,0.0002449441,0.00017898699,0.0019476479,0.9913999,0.000027482642],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005179812,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00043499065,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9858325,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000025170428,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000050855793,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1996992},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390564651","doi":"10.1017/9781009235402.004","title":"Settling In","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Agrarian society; Colonization; Colonialism; Navy; League; Political science; Economic history; Ancient history; Geography; Law; History; Agriculture; Archaeology","score_opus":0.028043117033571756,"score_gpt":0.24332037924914923,"score_spread":0.21527726221557747,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390564651","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00021781187,0.00026442553,0.000011034691,0.00012078804,0.00052335527,0.00023043464,0.00006423976,0.00016077714,0.9984071],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0024129916,0.00033714288,0.000011465902,0.00003351857,0.00031588532,2.9161689e-7,0.0000112196985,0.000023256443,0.99685425],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99905485,0.00002514543,0.00011966085,0.0003184375,0.00025734413,0.00022453445],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99954623,0.000046751735,0.00006629613,0.0001765733,0.000056876997,0.000107280815],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00019681126,0.00016161341,0.00020034912,0.00021727361,0.00021072116,0.00007198914,0.00025016296,0.00034211687,0.000015393716],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000058096625,0.00020896965,0.00013692088,0.000011720324,0.00021570017,0.00007214569,0.00014076194,0.00043146283,0.000043893542],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013230513,0.0000024487952,0.0000018401191,0.000027771255,0.000025652958,0.00027164666,0.00083440973,9.4985717e-7,0.0000040378045,0.9897615,0.0073615904,0.0016949441],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001276504,0.000010181631,0.000007452779,0.00021816172,0.00006284034,0.0000010232318,0.00022678428,0.000021542386,0.0000053659,0.000092310744,0.9990119,0.0002148267],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030344736,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00034242487,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9916503,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003617485,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016472541,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8521535},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390616247","doi":"10.1139/dsa-2023-0074","title":"Note of appreciation","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Drone Systems and Applications","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology","score_opus":0.014201588750859933,"score_gpt":0.3154328569895113,"score_spread":0.3012312682386514,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390616247","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.067631364,0.019067831,0.32356885,0.0060339156,0.0014557285,0.003020824,0.00013197323,0.00067092845,0.5784186],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99695396,0.00020745823,0.000042281627,0.000004604074,0.0003672144,0.000109743356,0.0000055936334,0.0000033447054,0.0023057773],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996252,0.000019470845,0.00010865832,0.00008849195,0.00009923131,0.00005891677],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99980175,0.00004299416,0.000027910997,0.0000639391,0.00003234043,0.000031051397],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00023178748,0.000027955297,0.00005447808,0.00003623465,0.00014805622,0.00005560709,0.000033324082,0.000037559013,0.000013179737],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000004314124,0.000026772159,0.00001727849,0.00016026021,0.000050148014,0.00006638139,0.0000064022856,0.000028581051,0.000015866959],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[4.7408267e-7,0.0000108137665,0.00012787589,0.00006009733,0.0000055061055,7.066667e-8,0.0029557317,0.000008829408,0.00069754076,0.9346126,0.00033166542,0.061188813],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023978348,0.0000053909735,0.0005571695,0.000021559583,0.000010008332,4.428679e-7,0.0006325065,0.00079727574,0.00002476285,0.0009121824,0.9969809,0.000033823806],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0017572163,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00014806048,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9966492,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000018964141,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003707408,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26563972},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390718940","doi":"10.1017/9781805431817.035","title":"Persons entitled to be summoned to a convocation","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology","score_opus":0.03932092501704992,"score_gpt":0.35786208445658513,"score_spread":0.3185411594395352,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390718940","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000055326844,0.0001178833,0.00030001404,0.020247413,0.000970926,0.00046034434,0.000019012405,0.00035834868,0.97747076],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0019310176,0.000034201687,0.00025742833,0.001379322,0.00076452596,0.0000403148,0.0000090446065,0.00010177864,0.9954824],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992436,0.000027327464,0.00007658124,0.00022589393,0.00024947186,0.00017713368],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99964905,0.0000105089675,0.000021597896,0.00012738472,0.000023363038,0.00016806863],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00018601636,0.00008791106,0.00011264908,0.00020976391,0.0000654193,0.00011522061,0.00011397687,0.00014390712,0.03621009],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000036242465,0.0000841759,0.00005550618,0.00025810313,0.000024655652,0.000018211116,0.00003009591,0.000057866804,0.007618528],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000018096998,0.000007902351,0.0000040230198,0.000008212713,0.000016952497,0.0000010598392,0.012588643,3.200845e-8,0.000023908748,0.019327927,0.96646374,0.0015557995],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000334289,0.000020772979,0.000012041903,0.000050368522,0.00002170946,6.6442404e-8,0.0020008753,0.0000010275991,0.000007579334,0.000052353604,0.99768406,0.00011572368],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.027324537,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.108594604,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08127006,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008244152,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009399098,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99315417},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390877498","doi":"10.1139/tcsme-2023-0139","title":"Note of appreciation","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Transactions of the Canadian Society for Mechanical Engineering","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Calculus (dental)","score_opus":0.012972967191125446,"score_gpt":0.2549250029702599,"score_spread":0.24195203577913443,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390877498","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0071117165,0.00033032455,0.9811378,0.0066440017,0.0025566763,0.00060672883,0.0001944577,0.00012445574,0.0012938053],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971653,0.00003290394,0.0023404118,0.000022586779,0.00008152846,0.000014134712,0.0000012675068,0.00000906261,0.00033277305],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99952537,0.000006648513,0.00012498081,0.00007216325,0.0001315195,0.00013934141],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99968314,0.00009182554,0.000017909166,0.00008174012,0.00004507571,0.000080315804],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00031049582,0.000043485245,0.000073864525,0.000032056676,0.00019563288,0.000016730653,0.000115399125,0.00010055448,0.000044057873],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000028135555,0.00004035465,0.00038889798,0.00026725346,0.000033722783,0.00007201066,0.0000014629201,0.000098111836,4.9789537e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010711675,0.000044210246,0.0000054709767,0.00067633815,0.00047015538,2.8351343e-7,0.029354403,0.0400088,0.032176595,0.8025027,0.001268764,0.0934816],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026776167,0.000061175255,0.00007844531,0.00025479513,0.00026589882,0.0000010646734,0.0009365488,0.25353205,0.020989196,0.0027155846,0.7206584,0.00023904206],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.039515045,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10502301,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9900536,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022999637,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00033577875,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9668809},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390893816","doi":"10.1017/9781108566230.001","title":"Table of Cases","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Table (database); Computer science; Information retrieval; Database","score_opus":0.03711431031105409,"score_gpt":0.3329521909904064,"score_spread":0.2958378806793523,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390893816","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000008762367,0.00012873061,0.000008886122,0.00013818192,0.0003840783,0.00006293107,0.0000126388095,0.0003578665,0.9988979],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00076265895,0.0006972781,0.000029086425,0.000014221528,0.00033403834,0.0000022284532,0.0000012000125,0.00010099205,0.9980583],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99966735,0.000013038297,0.000050398965,0.00006124247,0.00013202138,0.000075933436],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998172,0.000037984333,0.000046012363,0.000063188716,0.00001288268,0.000022740784],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00009345533,0.00003405136,0.000081494996,0.000054373766,0.000034575583,0.000007322656,0.00005613189,0.00009581567,0.017811954],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000039765873,0.000030610983,0.000025659821,0.000121482546,0.000058791116,0.000012452208,0.000009740472,0.000022574219,0.00016900313],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[3.8437264e-7,0.000005724624,0.00010177094,0.000006278659,0.000009111835,0.0000032688874,0.0002900522,3.2874407e-8,0.0000010797833,0.033508513,0.96252847,0.0035453192],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002066008,0.0000064055816,0.000028224315,0.000027641001,0.000005472748,9.401375e-8,0.00030304398,2.3699945e-7,0.00000454411,0.000048171245,0.99951947,0.00003604063],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.16579358,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.21526965,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04947607,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000070867577,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000059042337,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9830859},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390925355","doi":"10.1515/9780776627922-004","title":"CHAPTER IV Legal Cases Around the World","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of Ottawa Press eBooks","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"History; Political science","score_opus":0.0371662392765481,"score_gpt":0.24774947977110418,"score_spread":0.21058324049455607,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390925355","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0002239207,0.0001583691,0.000019424073,0.0003806991,0.0003823089,0.00036676915,0.00005410974,0.00005488205,0.9983595],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.064370856,0.00010199104,0.0000203386,0.00005775067,0.00026684641,1.10054025e-7,0.0000049369137,0.000016578615,0.9351606],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988982,0.000040480892,0.00014602969,0.00026623602,0.00044076695,0.00020829914],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99897337,0.00016727079,0.00027909872,0.00035717842,0.00013815405,0.0000849173],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002384144,0.00018446636,0.0002685364,0.000115550814,0.00056266814,0.000057248795,0.0005162396,0.00020424397,0.0008092751],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000073383326,0.00017858148,0.00023257291,0.000007527385,0.0007681555,0.00011380877,0.00014750798,0.0002988487,0.00004626156],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025431755,0.000005521533,0.00001464531,0.000014003216,0.000077342804,0.00004540411,0.0028853482,0.0000019820206,0.0000031090558,0.98927224,0.0035217595,0.0041332203],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019290615,0.000037481666,0.000028036211,0.00008476218,0.00012725269,0.0000027321503,0.00045546764,0.0000058493893,0.0000110998535,0.0006042745,0.9982525,0.0001976449],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021538233,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.059563544,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9947307,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008532275,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015956128,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9849774},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391161308","doi":"10.5040/9781509970131","title":"Private International Law in East Asia","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Hart Publishing eBooks","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique; York University; National Research Centre","keywords":"East Asia; Political science; Law; Geography; China","score_opus":0.030704746449904473,"score_gpt":0.2849421706320657,"score_spread":0.2542374241821613,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391161308","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000059920894,0.00010908227,0.000008097316,0.005920729,0.0039598364,0.0002450565,0.00004942479,0.0002692401,0.98937863],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.012145955,0.000016365464,0.000054990927,0.0006084784,0.0031845453,0.00003059292,0.00012742187,0.00004598733,0.9837857],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99797034,0.000072449424,0.0003494078,0.00042578613,0.00084074965,0.00034124692],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993251,0.00006227753,0.00013624625,0.00021715311,0.0001267425,0.00013251328],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012247503,0.00019697762,0.00022669847,0.0003103045,0.0002260893,0.0043863514,0.0007180553,0.0004980614,0.0005494965],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013448148,0.00021128301,0.0001449497,0.000060519043,0.00022998692,0.0010054258,0.00022883996,0.0009601358,0.00023094761],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000047160943,0.0000074272507,0.000014767576,0.000018777959,0.000028380919,0.00003754447,0.0054797297,2.9462578e-7,0.0000053014924,0.8565813,0.12915832,0.008663464],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011556287,0.000007637447,0.00003126873,0.0003601272,0.000015008486,0.0000018246607,0.00015743598,0.000010289306,0.000002850028,0.051152032,0.9479439,0.00020200985],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016210208,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013346749,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8187856,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00064719585,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007099597,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9966472},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391378650","doi":"10.1139/as-2023-0048","title":"Note of appreciation","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Arctic Science","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Geology","score_opus":0.01947327005408917,"score_gpt":0.35673500420651344,"score_spread":0.3372617341524243,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391378650","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.597235,0.00044391514,0.005740959,0.00809539,0.00367596,0.00023744335,0.0000023018956,0.00020984128,0.38435918],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99876666,0.000048178168,0.00031915674,0.000035864534,0.000119069584,0.0000018245224,1.4155673e-7,0.000001509736,0.0007075915],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99922425,0.000017473249,0.000077392324,0.00012632647,0.00042451726,0.00013002829],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99967825,0.000093973744,0.000019507894,0.00007576783,0.00008684238,0.00004565919],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011702258,0.000024002547,0.000035123852,0.00009114858,0.00023304942,0.00008285531,0.00015532394,0.000017472585,0.000118877804],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00028469015,0.000021818214,0.000022145052,0.00087950914,0.0005230493,0.00036226778,0.000020283102,0.000036599373,0.00004082415],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002699107,0.000021508944,0.0029496835,0.000025351092,0.0000030581111,0.0000015797266,0.042486954,0.000015919639,0.013981365,0.6779014,0.00017796838,0.26243255],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000132918,0.00009943012,0.07399229,0.00022703661,0.000028562661,0.0000031812092,0.002717979,0.0077677737,0.00789821,0.037803918,0.86908674,0.00024195407],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016132595,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00022825124,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86890876,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000077408156,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00033789247,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24387765},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391436236","doi":"10.1139/bcb-2023-0272","title":"Note of appreciation","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biochemistry and Cell Biology","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Chemistry; Biology; Psychology","score_opus":0.010047788432344856,"score_gpt":0.28404442817065984,"score_spread":0.273996639738315,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391436236","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8041491,0.0029355234,0.00015356575,0.00054456433,0.00025851213,0.00003353755,0.000009165732,0.0000347224,0.19188134],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970245,0.0005081141,0.000034037817,0.00001375142,0.0001944013,0.000001433893,0.000008704072,0.0000012456442,0.002213836],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997531,0.000015447591,0.000057757232,0.0000860352,0.00002618387,0.000061435574],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998783,0.000037173944,0.000015762647,0.00003300591,0.000013444012,0.000022314109],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00012795605,0.000026451005,0.00004019346,0.000009928802,0.00004904737,0.00000896617,0.000029314237,0.00009792447,0.000082049],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000013392318,0.000024273379,0.000018166644,0.000049102946,0.000102240054,0.000014894747,0.00000931534,0.00003172791,0.0000035161656],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000070265946,0.000015177139,0.0005875084,0.000073244664,0.000005785721,5.939048e-7,0.002001135,1.8824849e-7,0.88104314,0.010650003,0.00038450112,0.10523168],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000043625456,0.000018807576,0.00011641525,0.000010151756,0.0000074313193,3.0412804e-7,0.00023219518,0.000046547924,0.26747045,0.00064257847,0.73136634,0.000045135082],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00012696373,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000009198056,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7309818,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000084381745,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000041098123,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.098983966},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391445570","doi":"10.1177/2753412x231222587","title":"Consensus and Compulsion: The Extra-territorial Effect of Chinese Judicial and Specially-Invited Mediation in Common Law Countries","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Chinese Journal of Transnational Law","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mediation; Law; Political science; Common law; Psychology; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.006553439253355836,"score_gpt":0.29651403873488674,"score_spread":0.2899605994815309,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391445570","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.969076,0.0011040668,0.000023980761,0.025953121,0.0022130457,0.0001720425,0.00003067876,0.0000097046095,0.0014173709],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974961,0.00015376869,0.000026140098,0.000121880075,0.0021817365,0.0000016064619,0.0000064264373,0.0000067116935,0.0000055878286],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99846864,0.00027905087,0.00044923197,0.00009748609,0.00060370093,0.00010186895],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980597,0.0015618914,0.00013066585,0.00004161371,0.00014184331,0.00006426844],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015723758,0.000115642586,0.00029207702,0.00010951419,0.00024788806,0.00011131154,0.00010035052,0.00008984858,0.0000326201],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000059811093,0.00006849288,0.00008222443,0.0002241166,0.0005800945,0.00024030062,0.000010243577,0.00022295774,1.7590575e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00072396465,0.000055070104,0.03871881,0.000100941885,0.000083571125,0.000041165036,0.010834788,0.00005970383,0.0008676123,0.9465756,0.0001279167,0.0018108527],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00811767,0.0013275602,0.5230477,0.00044494268,0.00027329463,0.0002459097,0.00038342486,0.0029872842,0.00033943617,0.29971984,0.16253796,0.0005750124],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00053514866,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011866709,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6468558,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000477353,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000077176264,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.66219026},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391483123","doi":"10.1002/iir.1530","title":"<i>Re Simplicity &amp; Vogue Retailing (HK) Co Ltd</i> [2023] <scp>HKCFI</scp> 1443 (<scp>HCCW</scp> 457/2022, 30 May 2023) (coram Linda Chan J) [case comment]","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Insolvency Review","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Chemistry; Advertising; Business","score_opus":0.06577311175620933,"score_gpt":0.3824403934068162,"score_spread":0.31666728165060687,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391483123","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.092225194,0.31849664,0.0028653054,0.05497854,0.017002132,0.004736102,0.001957199,0.0016346411,0.50610423],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4875601,0.40947613,0.0005791363,0.025851749,0.008089341,0.00074379117,0.0015022174,0.00024527652,0.06595225],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99508345,0.00047762846,0.0012304374,0.00096604694,0.0014473763,0.0007950693],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99663556,0.0013444169,0.00046468058,0.00058308645,0.00054762996,0.00042460344],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028516434,0.00051296584,0.0007192921,0.0002844879,0.0008263203,0.0006865497,0.0010505256,0.0003237151,0.0018808927],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017493878,0.0005110459,0.0006486765,0.0010431529,0.00028462138,0.0008028527,0.00029276905,0.00095430616,0.0022131195],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000068646505,0.00066412863,0.0031284248,0.0026957367,0.0007398211,0.0012430495,0.007837485,0.000026636817,0.00038381654,0.04286697,0.84276426,0.097642794],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023634739,0.0000773712,0.00013977515,0.0033937593,0.0001608275,0.00010214987,0.0007488414,0.000283756,0.00007840448,0.0011041893,0.9935156,0.00015898012],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029258844,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030676895,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.44015202,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005227856,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00041302855,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997341},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391633959","doi":"10.29053/2523-1367/2023/v7a17","title":"Les limitations de l’accès à internet en Afrique à l’aune de la Communication 742/20, African Freedom of Expression Exchange et 15 autres (représenté par FOI Attorneys) c. Algérie et 27 autres","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"African Human Rights Yearbook / Annuaire Africain des Droits de l’Homme","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Freedom of expression; Humanities; Philosophy; Political science; Human rights","score_opus":0.0360023532497368,"score_gpt":0.3225714502278518,"score_spread":0.28656909697811495,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391633959","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5086618,0.00056567474,0.0013593064,0.010894328,0.00016450271,0.0010028941,0.00017543562,0.0011191549,0.4760569],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9835277,0.00033902767,0.0019469392,0.00013575224,0.00022289917,0.0002141564,0.00011768474,0.00008918438,0.013406611],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9934036,0.0034988557,0.0007267511,0.00062800903,0.0007036069,0.0010391707],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9950893,0.0027997652,0.0005253007,0.0008644353,0.0002965352,0.00042466752],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004010521,0.00044017777,0.00056705566,0.000601009,0.0012613531,0.00032645313,0.0012492029,0.00047439136,0.0005121418],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00057570514,0.0004316257,0.00031150418,0.00089445914,0.0015145602,0.0006467678,0.0004438277,0.000659873,0.00004622057],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000096586584,0.00064687233,0.004284559,0.00009560805,0.00019489281,0.000087750595,0.422228,0.00018994903,0.004880798,0.5273136,0.037565418,0.0024159476],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010655213,0.00033928658,0.040311873,0.0006025537,0.00015808102,0.00001628659,0.014940718,0.00087991054,0.0018323433,0.16179731,0.7771748,0.0008813699],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013458679,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018644327,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.73960936,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006744618,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003076905,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99981356},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391796572","doi":"10.7202/1100104ar","title":"P. DAILLIER, A. PELLET, DROIT INTERNATIONAL PUBLIC, (NGUYEN QUOC DINH), 7ÈME ÉD., PARIS, L.G.D.J., 2002, 1510 p.","year":2023,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue québécoise de droit international","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Pellet; Titer; Political science; Virology; Medicine; Materials science; Composite material","score_opus":0.023804142165996453,"score_gpt":0.28365308121559774,"score_spread":0.25984893904960127,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391796572","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.065759644,0.005476984,0.0014949745,0.18627915,0.030031277,0.00081603916,0.0011319818,0.000843803,0.7081661],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.37304908,0.040440936,0.0005481501,0.0024296658,0.015001494,0.00019603258,0.0012139616,0.00017305106,0.56694764],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.994408,0.00027778288,0.0011713557,0.0010864311,0.0017359413,0.001320485],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99675435,0.0005049362,0.0006357667,0.00057868124,0.00082309364,0.00070318615],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018636064,0.00053056784,0.00056933897,0.0007794388,0.0006651266,0.0008160351,0.0019750744,0.0006510192,0.016434632],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007764556,0.0007241347,0.00066065125,0.0013133393,0.00061284483,0.0013814907,0.00037887946,0.00087386457,0.007038894],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010106345,0.00063699717,0.008309286,0.00007984752,0.0007697176,0.0003132765,0.0066952812,0.00025874277,0.00020130635,0.58096904,0.31381783,0.08784762],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008713946,0.000074847245,0.006849356,0.00030831114,0.00009619132,0.00010628379,0.0010225519,0.015350816,0.000033432072,0.017274173,0.95731133,0.0007012923],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014710222,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0111906035,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.64349353,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024669645,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00093427394,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99952096},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391796622","doi":"10.7202/1100715ar","title":"Gérald Goldstein et Ethel Groffier, Traité de droit civil : Droit international privé, Tome I, Théorie générale, Cowansville (Qc.), Yvon Blais, 1998","year":2023,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue québécoise de droit international","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Combinatorics; Philosophy; Mathematics","score_opus":0.01716330493011127,"score_gpt":0.28247964868275144,"score_spread":0.2653163437526402,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391796622","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.42814228,0.00095695705,0.0027319088,0.0776908,0.013217661,0.00090146234,0.0017379397,0.0007537966,0.4738672],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8554932,0.005890815,0.000514628,0.0027620536,0.005438209,0.00018230542,0.0010815146,0.00013962283,0.12849766],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99412644,0.0003798867,0.0012472825,0.0011319075,0.0017293618,0.0013851367],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969525,0.00068597466,0.00066251715,0.00056667475,0.00047232016,0.0006600443],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024789004,0.00057752524,0.00067203643,0.00070861215,0.00049985346,0.00055255106,0.0018953476,0.0007841909,0.0029155333],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006003766,0.0008388539,0.0007632742,0.0012199002,0.0005847297,0.0011698934,0.00030874513,0.0011127882,0.0014926288],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023084282,0.00069221907,0.005309192,0.00015133752,0.00072849303,0.00042890664,0.01610653,0.0015581726,0.0011753852,0.9257301,0.017315557,0.030573258],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014700379,0.00019667101,0.017349895,0.0007256871,0.00015273689,0.00020926738,0.0013149666,0.01763301,0.00014265157,0.12841493,0.83146495,0.00092519703],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012254391,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.047137987,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8141494,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032810553,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013090442,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994062},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391796633","doi":"10.7202/1100712ar","title":"Paul-André Crépeau et Élise M. Charpentier, Les Principes d’UNIDROIT et le Code civil du Québec : valeurs partagées ?, Scarborough (Ont.), Carswell, 1998","year":2023,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue québécoise de droit international","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Art","score_opus":0.02707822753473357,"score_gpt":0.28580971626366053,"score_spread":0.258731488728927,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391796633","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6244267,0.004433629,0.0006998381,0.15646791,0.006070114,0.0006365321,0.0011155682,0.00055718725,0.2055925],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93903565,0.013936932,0.000097387645,0.0013116603,0.0019890093,0.00012786237,0.00040962882,0.000086199645,0.043005638],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99603987,0.00047884023,0.0008189538,0.0008363565,0.0009803724,0.0008456162],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99776924,0.00056015624,0.00048293264,0.0004672944,0.0003287534,0.000391628],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018983854,0.00044821037,0.0005298089,0.00029603584,0.00067473634,0.0003937399,0.0010001156,0.0003768937,0.0009181882],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000442299,0.0005725733,0.00052271655,0.00064070686,0.0005968536,0.0009899308,0.00024919625,0.00061084394,0.000596634],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020489436,0.001052521,0.02940363,0.00028263248,0.0007693309,0.0005013446,0.04252105,0.0018054037,0.0005050548,0.81619596,0.06286193,0.04389625],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008164902,0.00008994101,0.01912095,0.00045515006,0.00011997534,0.00007304583,0.002517033,0.007882987,0.00013220905,0.005938101,0.9622822,0.00057192886],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.392125,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.72100294,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89942026,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011386803,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022278687,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999951},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391796724","doi":"10.7202/1100336ar","title":"Nabil N. Antaki. Le règlement amiable des litiges, Cowansville (Qc.), Yvon Blais, 1998","year":2023,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue québécoise de droit international","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Art","score_opus":0.02422173144455293,"score_gpt":0.28517295560757444,"score_spread":0.2609512241630215,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391796724","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.50440234,0.0028267712,0.00072065456,0.03579855,0.006580041,0.00051181583,0.00048673849,0.00039534338,0.44827774],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.83395815,0.009234922,0.0004193572,0.00068068627,0.0031698723,0.000095194126,0.00034578136,0.000055565568,0.15204048],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997236,0.00016933147,0.00057759177,0.0005275595,0.00069352315,0.00079600536],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986961,0.00022238985,0.000244259,0.00027521388,0.0002550567,0.00030700708],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011318194,0.00025916938,0.00030072778,0.00025209883,0.0006988757,0.00025161845,0.0006036763,0.0002518833,0.001447829],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018882236,0.00034485915,0.00028672017,0.0007214142,0.00052891334,0.0005423429,0.00012242852,0.0003113905,0.0013437495],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006965891,0.0005279302,0.0061012576,0.00021779732,0.00031459262,0.0001868451,0.019215677,0.00083304633,0.00069720024,0.85646534,0.037095517,0.078275114],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00051996676,0.00010441866,0.00727487,0.0003996811,0.00005138336,0.000036944348,0.0023775545,0.0041470933,0.00022367542,0.023453237,0.96105963,0.00035154715],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.084537484,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.054694403,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9239641,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001604209,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00080721517,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99990034},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391796729","doi":"10.7202/1100397ar","title":"CONFÉRENCE INAUGURALE","year":2023,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue québécoise de droit international","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.02541870969521281,"score_gpt":0.29801414766917916,"score_spread":0.27259543797396635,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391796729","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22575556,0.0007454097,0.00036438648,0.06560982,0.009798862,0.000202541,0.00013948168,0.00027663607,0.6971073],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.61601686,0.003615226,0.00012578558,0.0010908579,0.0032772634,0.000033952274,0.00008625944,0.000023375396,0.37573043],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99841815,0.00008881304,0.00031151538,0.00030996156,0.00042020023,0.00045136746],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991005,0.00018438188,0.00014754487,0.00017403514,0.00019879262,0.00019471828],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00060813606,0.00013889594,0.00016806724,0.00017373003,0.00023506761,0.0001300678,0.00048024938,0.00018655445,0.002606437],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019244234,0.00019375756,0.00017128547,0.000599793,0.00029358084,0.0003595228,0.000063336054,0.00023142758,0.0030856687],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016985468,0.00007339048,0.002219309,0.00003646377,0.00007067542,0.00010906868,0.0057881987,0.00015192361,0.00019099136,0.9123537,0.021649068,0.057340242],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020276531,0.000035980895,0.009536001,0.00018689303,0.000026333488,0.000034358793,0.0005147509,0.0064493115,0.00004201875,0.019789714,0.9629798,0.0002020641],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013557702,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0055025322,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94133073,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00048460616,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00033539996,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9983053},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391796776","doi":"10.7202/1100340ar","title":"La pratique judiciaire du droit international privé au Québec en 1999","year":2023,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue québécoise de droit international","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.012121512505041772,"score_gpt":0.27703721670350256,"score_spread":0.2649157041984608,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391796776","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.37923136,0.00037817244,0.0009934106,0.15395086,0.009845867,0.00040504185,0.00024143298,0.00039340433,0.45456046],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90575415,0.0030506898,0.0001700739,0.0010757911,0.007947608,0.00010951376,0.00024775878,0.000063497224,0.08158094],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967433,0.00036425347,0.0007140043,0.00061868114,0.00091246434,0.0006473045],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99782115,0.00079065986,0.00039111913,0.00029260307,0.00038003433,0.00032443562],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017692387,0.00031809614,0.0003438472,0.000403396,0.00043696555,0.00026597004,0.0011203563,0.0005140194,0.0017621948],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009476896,0.00043155055,0.00038097543,0.0006220582,0.00045193272,0.0007182041,0.00020552128,0.0006376665,0.0014303719],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007694052,0.00034930266,0.02839474,0.00006832186,0.0004529355,0.00039118115,0.038489904,0.0004395756,0.00018346457,0.8110651,0.014765899,0.10532265],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005030326,0.00006462475,0.06013221,0.00038052275,0.00006878692,0.00016422899,0.0016210247,0.008285451,0.000027703214,0.011704357,0.9166496,0.00039845495],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.35310307,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.49963844,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9018837,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0060614645,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036047467,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998136},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391796911","doi":"10.7202/1100905ar","title":"La pratique judiciaire du droit international privé au Québec en 1993-1994","year":2023,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue québécoise de droit international","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.012439749400341692,"score_gpt":0.27841298944922455,"score_spread":0.26597324004888284,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391796911","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.43148592,0.00031591748,0.0010862745,0.12874681,0.009966129,0.0004323986,0.00026778638,0.00041362742,0.42728513],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90753424,0.0025947054,0.0001801073,0.0011401282,0.008057104,0.00011759257,0.00027538568,0.00006790269,0.08003281],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965525,0.00037811176,0.0007607416,0.00065828173,0.0009664845,0.00068385294],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997794,0.000832378,0.0004198301,0.0003122257,0.0002968967,0.00034471645],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018208775,0.00034023132,0.00036756226,0.0004298245,0.00046486003,0.00027112104,0.0011850835,0.0005346929,0.0017903388],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008427498,0.00046147502,0.00040684245,0.0006553047,0.00047999137,0.00075518346,0.00022062821,0.0006749671,0.0011737786],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008562638,0.00037586215,0.028691603,0.00007386127,0.0004844836,0.0004229401,0.038665723,0.00048390945,0.00019462928,0.8163956,0.012891739,0.101234056],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005461127,0.000070932045,0.05580217,0.00040709763,0.00007560473,0.00017825884,0.0016872914,0.0097835,0.000029150808,0.012380014,0.9186071,0.00043275283],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.36490586,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.50433284,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90571535,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0063299364,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036365914,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997837},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391796926","doi":"10.7202/1101225ar","title":"La négociation et la mise en oeuvre des conventions de droit international privé : perspectives canadiennes et québécoises","year":2023,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue québécoise de droit international","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Wildlife Federation","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Philosophy; Humanities","score_opus":0.017699024686863428,"score_gpt":0.30730472235818485,"score_spread":0.28960569767132144,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391796926","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.58262926,0.0005474322,0.001341608,0.033801172,0.0023947202,0.00031767343,0.00054253964,0.0002859005,0.3781397],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9242153,0.007927566,0.00051218586,0.00054759736,0.0014849099,0.0001256233,0.00032625266,0.00006170939,0.06479881],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966791,0.0008806487,0.0005614516,0.0005883507,0.00064997654,0.0006404658],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99729013,0.001225966,0.0003633173,0.00022820855,0.0005526619,0.0003397297],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025771158,0.00030737935,0.00030604345,0.0005252582,0.00041985637,0.00042985272,0.0007506211,0.00041328295,0.0011354134],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013382733,0.00043046154,0.00040354763,0.0006312548,0.00059857516,0.0009476334,0.00012170356,0.000586681,0.00022083132],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000050103634,0.00034553275,0.012574912,0.00006136362,0.0004050529,0.00014321388,0.10820989,0.0005728161,0.000165401,0.8522606,0.002094235,0.023116866],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00065281347,0.00006358179,0.1259079,0.00053843204,0.00012701923,0.00020960213,0.018218385,0.0052782926,0.000017262768,0.06350038,0.7850401,0.00044624595],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.15129374,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.47453663,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.78876024,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034629295,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015174836,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998147},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391796936","doi":"10.7202/1101425ar","title":"Turp, D. et G. A. Beaudouin (dir.), Perspectives canadiennes et européennes des droits de la personne, Actes des Journées strasbourgeoises de l’institut canadien d’études juridiques supérieures 1984, Cowansville (Qué.), Les Éditions Yvon Blais Inc., 1986, 722 p. (40,00$ CAN)","year":2023,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue québécoise de droit international","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.017598337688037567,"score_gpt":0.288174862413007,"score_spread":0.2705765247249694,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391796936","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.88205427,0.0055733677,0.00014676618,0.021879533,0.00087608764,0.000386795,0.0026026198,0.00038332574,0.08609721],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9563101,0.028191466,0.00069861324,0.00043168187,0.0014445533,0.00013828445,0.00035332356,0.00011170323,0.012320289],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9952972,0.0010564,0.0006863562,0.00082350953,0.0006803987,0.0014561279],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99604833,0.0014481668,0.00039438627,0.00030957704,0.00093118055,0.0008683482],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002078867,0.0006157403,0.00057421,0.00078139134,0.0021588611,0.00088472717,0.0009517358,0.00045419866,0.0009368175],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021000865,0.0007526831,0.0004302278,0.00092006155,0.002612475,0.0012492185,0.00012444278,0.0008623874,0.000035207624],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011344354,0.0005199143,0.02406106,0.00027384452,0.00071342214,0.000895056,0.20021534,0.0027051857,0.0015165308,0.7501512,0.010632132,0.008202879],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008219038,0.00035914683,0.18048139,0.0017388315,0.00037111397,0.001109314,0.07383342,0.0021825265,0.0005490599,0.04446468,0.69267267,0.0014159601],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.78780204,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9767441,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7056865,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003807618,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004254629,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99997646},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391796941","doi":"10.7202/1101342ar","title":"CHRONIQUE DE JURISPRUDENCE","year":2023,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue québécoise de droit international","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Political science; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.020654002210930583,"score_gpt":0.3074305793459025,"score_spread":0.28677657713497196,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391796941","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.28924412,0.0011402736,0.0029553121,0.09277708,0.00725933,0.00027589328,0.00012386356,0.00038755496,0.6058366],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.70727855,0.00866845,0.00058825,0.0013492614,0.0056916024,0.00006868597,0.00005780343,0.00003943621,0.27625796],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982192,0.00013317766,0.0003177603,0.00033074693,0.00042201695,0.00057709054],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99903953,0.00020888243,0.00014974848,0.00018897657,0.0001684926,0.00024439278],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001005379,0.00015288162,0.00017023986,0.00017828424,0.00025488908,0.00014309009,0.0005592987,0.00025119708,0.0017682528],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002395971,0.00021659149,0.0001996169,0.000554986,0.00025159668,0.00034369034,0.00006999495,0.00030158772,0.0016148818],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023435052,0.00011676584,0.0034133473,0.00006708434,0.00009678907,0.00021072474,0.011992476,0.000478419,0.00048066,0.88688153,0.027061736,0.06917702],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018114182,0.000041308915,0.01467704,0.0002634907,0.00003030722,0.000064494336,0.00032605132,0.011866479,0.00011173336,0.029240055,0.9429811,0.00021678754],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01841121,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010641284,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91591936,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017096313,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008278863,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991625},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391796955","doi":"10.7202/1101429ar","title":"CHRONIQUE DE JURISPRUDENCE","year":2023,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue québécoise de droit international","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Philosophy; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.020654002210930583,"score_gpt":0.3074305793459025,"score_spread":0.28677657713497196,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391796955","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.28924412,0.0011402736,0.0029553121,0.09277708,0.00725933,0.00027589328,0.00012386356,0.00038755496,0.6058366],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.70727855,0.00866845,0.00058825,0.0013492614,0.0056916024,0.00006868597,0.00005780343,0.00003943621,0.27625796],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982192,0.00013317766,0.0003177603,0.00033074693,0.00042201695,0.00057709054],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99903953,0.00020888243,0.00014974848,0.00018897657,0.0001684926,0.00024439278],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001005379,0.00015288162,0.00017023986,0.00017828424,0.00025488908,0.00014309009,0.0005592987,0.00025119708,0.0017682528],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002395971,0.00021659149,0.0001996169,0.000554986,0.00025159668,0.00034369034,0.00006999495,0.00030158772,0.0016148818],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023435052,0.00011676584,0.0034133473,0.00006708434,0.00009678907,0.00021072474,0.011992476,0.000478419,0.00048066,0.88688153,0.027061736,0.06917702],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018114182,0.000041308915,0.01467704,0.0002634907,0.00003030722,0.000064494336,0.00032605132,0.011866479,0.00011173336,0.029240055,0.9429811,0.00021678754],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01841121,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010641284,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91591936,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017096313,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008278863,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9991625},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391869603","doi":"10.51644/9780889205666-009","title":"5 Narine-Singh v. Attorney General of Canada","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.01535839148972607,"score_gpt":0.24022172452039653,"score_spread":0.22486333303067046,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391869603","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00034573989,0.00012055978,0.000017850438,0.00067985314,0.00058906636,0.00009765955,0.000021147309,0.000029264444,0.99809885],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.014697926,0.000055010896,0.00006809332,0.00014504013,0.00074744393,8.8400486e-7,0.000018686756,0.00001484782,0.9842521],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998945,0.000009885105,0.00022534438,0.0001588087,0.0004796942,0.0001812816],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994967,0.000024322964,0.00014145675,0.00013428152,0.00012106649,0.00008217494],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00013779767,0.000121972924,0.00020352738,0.000041004863,0.00018265312,0.000018444494,0.00013475517,0.00018459845,0.0028822355],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000007604322,0.00012084259,0.00008211145,0.000018657178,0.00011626075,0.000033115124,0.00002697659,0.00010833561,0.000005428505],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000027829085,0.000004133007,0.00009259048,0.0000072496414,0.000020148316,0.0000062305808,0.00016856956,0.0000052157297,0.0000068698187,0.819075,0.17769906,0.0029121481],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000521692,0.0000105275785,0.00021482407,0.000018082532,0.000015561529,3.3005153e-7,0.00001808693,0.000005781643,0.0000131450115,0.0019920229,0.9975217,0.00013777705],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.975577,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98962164,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8198226,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022671491,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0013486131,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9980293},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392771881","doi":"10.1093/grurint/ikae018","title":"35th Sharing Session – On SEPs – Standing Committee on the Law of Patents, WIPO, Geneva","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"GRUR International","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Session (web analytics); Law; Political science; Business; Engineering; Advertising","score_opus":0.06926275575575312,"score_gpt":0.3552564782010414,"score_spread":0.28599372244528826,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392771881","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5782402,0.00006866932,0.0002077708,0.012503216,0.0027327484,0.00013612384,0.000050958013,0.00008397251,0.4059763],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99602634,0.000058556143,0.00001458884,0.0003956842,0.0004558971,0.000005716645,0.000011802406,0.0000066827033,0.0030247313],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990245,0.00004245246,0.00013529224,0.00014506825,0.00054603623,0.00010665743],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99962723,0.00014912522,0.000044781504,0.000092904724,0.000056555717,0.000029394683],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00048964506,0.000060043014,0.00005704442,0.000060434446,0.0002545568,0.00013740319,0.00024707758,0.000042119947,0.00083599717],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000035124827,0.000042637887,0.000062457795,0.00009253414,0.00008007268,0.000120480254,0.00005134772,0.0001299976,0.000059454644],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018833442,0.000030838808,0.0015873008,0.000004388352,0.000036397356,0.0000038370404,0.0032981508,0.000040876315,0.0004450617,0.9874276,0.0034127517,0.0036939892],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021774854,0.000085485524,0.006883941,0.00054527156,0.000016253085,0.0000013408202,0.0014810272,0.0027532026,0.0023702634,0.015261601,0.97023773,0.00014611139],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00092968764,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003160167,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.972166,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001326124,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000028563867,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9153583},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4393019965","doi":"10.7202/1105759ar","title":"Wither the Divisional Court? Looking at the Past, Analyzing the Present, and Querying the Future of Ontario’s Intermediary Appellate Court","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ottawa Law Review","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Remand (court procedure); Political science; Court of record; Business; Original jurisdiction; Supreme court","score_opus":0.013631076992749217,"score_gpt":0.2866863568475972,"score_spread":0.27305527985484795,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4393019965","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02244054,0.49921376,0.00007134295,0.38565937,0.000961834,0.0011656024,0.000011894055,0.000030094066,0.09044558],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8015639,0.17134401,0.00003912737,0.009648598,0.0032785202,0.00007519681,0.000014318352,0.000040138715,0.013996156],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99816126,0.00064254156,0.00030688147,0.00020045991,0.00046645707,0.00022240238],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99865496,0.0005215715,0.0002464493,0.00041538943,0.00011525457,0.000046387297],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025696473,0.00012883177,0.00023275243,0.000007093353,0.0014863294,0.00013181713,0.00040511283,0.000049884315,0.00074960286],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000034241944,0.000050419683,0.00016807037,0.00021353489,0.00066147244,0.000098873745,0.00024611378,0.00030517406,0.000008941346],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028242199,0.00011597517,0.060397163,0.00086519565,0.00069518917,0.000028743774,0.055225767,0.000028469367,0.00010084634,0.23749407,0.16622053,0.4787998],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006523574,0.000007208579,0.005263091,0.0008220027,0.00014505253,0.000010629299,0.0006604425,0.000013142553,0.0000069737366,0.00034070815,0.99259466,0.0000708749],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011371327,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.19071002,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8263741,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008213032,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00017743575,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998136},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4393031737","doi":"10.1111/1468-2230.12885","title":"<i>R (on the application of W80)</i> v <i>Director General of the Independent Office of Police Conduct</i>: Landmark Ruling or Business as Usual?","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Law Review","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Nortel (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Landmark; Law; Political science; Director general; Management; Computer science; Economics; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.046857292845601334,"score_gpt":0.3459466951516419,"score_spread":0.29908940230604053,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4393031737","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.75099546,0.10503264,0.0019717983,0.020965954,0.0013304736,0.004471668,0.00019525361,0.00016196875,0.11487477],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9863033,0.012016909,0.000019741561,0.0009676013,0.00013352548,0.00003807016,0.000004425053,0.000011680722,0.0005046957],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986521,0.00022739208,0.0003657839,0.00016765256,0.00046131722,0.00012577072],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99898046,0.00025652576,0.00022325735,0.00031109422,0.00019794866,0.00003070387],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009901734,0.00009637192,0.00027446848,0.000017089389,0.00014170815,0.000020886366,0.00032095096,0.00005755675,0.00010120569],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009596946,0.00005031291,0.00012710603,0.00049522024,0.00019321505,0.000078416735,0.000051858016,0.00010565707,0.000008419145],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005476653,0.00014475739,0.000108283144,0.0034072339,0.000096596086,8.2525685e-7,0.0051174005,0.0000774294,0.011079721,0.9392018,0.001116442,0.039594743],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015327423,0.000041755713,0.0004453332,0.0038759343,0.00021770151,0.0000048811003,0.00007417653,0.0005622155,0.0025295587,0.002448727,0.98949057,0.00015588007],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019907892,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0034962073,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9883741,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000030475212,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019124732,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98661864},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4394114213","doi":"10.6084/m9.figshare.23982570","title":"Law","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"dataset","venue":"Figshare","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.08092811840701054,"score_gpt":0.3569291505564001,"score_spread":0.2760010321493896,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4394114213","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"dataset","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"dataset","genre_consensus":"dataset","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[1.4948817e-8,0.000054540436,1.9735917e-9,0.00030184447,0.0003795729,0.00013092623,0.9728179,0.00015036057,0.026164837],"genre_scores_gemma":[4.7246718e-7,0.000046672125,5.413965e-7,0.0002846302,0.0020038344,0.00008870435,0.9941205,0.000010316918,0.003444369],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991421,0.00004566816,0.000096387776,0.00017212733,0.0003302798,0.00021344669],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99945956,0.00010913051,0.0000717962,0.000209693,0.00006350952,0.00008629425],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00007271643,0.0000923663,0.0001127782,0.000042651314,0.0003765323,0.00013251766,0.00032199864,0.0002874421,0.34282845],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00048391562,0.000097996446,0.00007718621,0.00016695948,0.000013852222,0.00006708237,0.000088872046,0.00019599902,0.15061545],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[4.8459964e-7,0.000003426975,1.4585253e-8,0.00004012494,0.000006010702,0.000014361056,0.00007025737,7.6613816e-8,1.2592538e-8,0.00011653891,0.9993219,0.00042681978],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027645285,0.000006948601,0.0000072143735,0.00047819,0.000006727511,1.5773128e-7,0.000035514127,1.9458497e-7,2.2346158e-7,0.000042551528,0.99927604,0.00011861882],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010764007,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03789767,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19221298,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000050254446,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013881146,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9958234},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4394586781","doi":"10.59403/2a43jtb031","title":"Chapter 31: Spain","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"EC and international tax law series.","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Geography","score_opus":0.038975138312135,"score_gpt":0.28634173755810266,"score_spread":0.24736659924596766,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4394586781","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00006184754,0.00013920105,0.000012680071,0.008744758,0.0019249596,0.00013216736,0.000116707684,0.00012268018,0.988745],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.008478813,0.0028765542,0.000031547464,0.0005463957,0.0016111368,0.000007852119,0.000073806805,0.000031792493,0.9863421],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99895376,0.000009541472,0.00021271784,0.0002749345,0.00038672236,0.00016234061],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99947953,0.000043566484,0.00012845885,0.000110789646,0.00013485526,0.00010281907],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00026938744,0.00016917539,0.00017176657,0.000075578784,0.00032218915,0.00015526578,0.00019711112,0.0002244703,0.0034143287],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000023555584,0.00017643104,0.00009889492,0.000016150641,0.00039156084,0.00027666142,0.00009512745,0.00019466435,0.00039095464],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013377462,0.0000033617785,0.000010092255,0.0000040397595,0.00005575912,0.0000112444095,0.0007018789,2.3070677e-7,0.0000032449204,0.98650676,0.004289952,0.0084000705],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000093518735,0.00003161259,0.000049824117,0.000060452083,0.000012615753,0.0000029793907,0.00009879431,0.0000045329457,0.000002592765,0.07836645,0.9210971,0.00017955352],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019362468,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009372083,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9168071,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007405756,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000055987377,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99749666},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4395027506","doi":"10.59403/1tvzyyw010","title":"Chapter 10: Personal Scope of the Mutual Agreement Procedure and Arbitration Provisions, and the Mutual Assistance Provisions","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"WU Institute for Austrian and International Tax Law, tax law and policy series.","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"York University; Université du Luxembourg","keywords":"Scope (computer science); Arbitration; Agreement; Law; Mutual recognition; Law and economics; Business; Political science; Computer science; Sociology; International trade; Philosophy; Linguistics; Programming language","score_opus":0.029031522470391657,"score_gpt":0.2958994099348989,"score_spread":0.26686788746450724,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4395027506","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0031776328,0.0011538734,0.000040111005,0.027330402,0.00093907525,0.0026241627,0.0022274712,0.000027180287,0.96248007],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.38634324,0.0033549685,0.00007989682,0.0018712939,0.001430282,0.00007290746,0.00015111001,0.000028803865,0.60666746],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99850464,0.000033938548,0.0004035945,0.0004039375,0.00043640655,0.00021747687],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990045,0.00008937713,0.00039346848,0.0001613644,0.00022479083,0.00012649929],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00041599656,0.00028256062,0.00032761262,0.000077669254,0.0009885242,0.0002810547,0.00021143725,0.00026358265,0.0001505607],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010604967,0.00018955048,0.000115322735,0.00004018762,0.0026585478,0.0005386967,0.00014888821,0.00024394947,0.0000027512092],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00029622272,0.000014543746,0.000019120385,0.000070794405,0.0000902025,7.1269255e-7,0.0022322065,5.43931e-7,0.000017033282,0.9933092,0.0012861695,0.0026632731],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014132287,0.00017884496,0.00010216982,0.0003512941,0.00007935714,0.000019507353,0.00029923837,0.000049874885,0.000018233046,0.010287761,0.9869758,0.00022470334],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003418277,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.026297487,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98568964,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006733011,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00040795913,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99147004},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4395027554","doi":"10.59403/1tvzyyw007","title":"Chapter 7: Dual Residence for Non-Individuals","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"WU Institute for Austrian and International Tax Law, tax law and policy series.","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"York University; Université du Luxembourg","keywords":"Dual (grammatical number); Residence; Sociology; Demography; Art","score_opus":0.04955234767842484,"score_gpt":0.32891535915128667,"score_spread":0.2793630114728618,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4395027554","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00016858753,0.00016497246,0.00015266452,0.016506884,0.002377239,0.0014130655,0.005481429,0.000055464363,0.9736797],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.044734925,0.0019018529,0.0003776132,0.0025335748,0.0053090123,0.00008369448,0.00061305333,0.000054667966,0.9443916],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981806,0.000012580824,0.000473218,0.0005469009,0.00038854222,0.0003981396],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987656,0.00012321015,0.00035993708,0.00021552604,0.00029066252,0.0002450708],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00043764422,0.00037385288,0.00044218556,0.00017824899,0.00085103844,0.0004201932,0.00029109695,0.00050871284,0.0002754518],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009181956,0.00038069612,0.00020612378,0.00003140368,0.0011734273,0.0008991772,0.00012450562,0.00021414898,0.000022053491],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001090145,0.000009863849,0.000009913275,0.000054571585,0.00013792473,0.0000024842573,0.00083582936,0.0000013625774,0.000012261282,0.99012375,0.005720575,0.0029824448],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00095989276,0.0002243388,0.000019112504,0.00024600155,0.00006804089,0.000014530932,0.00007497507,0.0000068083614,0.000030046309,0.062106818,0.93584484,0.0004045838],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010686294,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.031066038,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9301243,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000120641496,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00036413732,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998645},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4395059326","doi":"10.29173/alr2701","title":"A \"Century\" Overdue: Revisiting the Doctrine of Spoliation in the Age of Electronic Documents","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Doctrine; Philosophy; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.01432152474522506,"score_gpt":0.3170235668739854,"score_spread":0.30270204212876034,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4395059326","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17885622,0.28675622,0.0000074534673,0.06813249,0.0004253782,0.0041381638,0.000012273581,0.000021775433,0.46165004],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9367099,0.06119984,0.0000023183775,0.0015954467,0.00007784719,0.000050788465,0.000010751958,0.0000036605613,0.00034948485],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983865,0.00061687443,0.00032669184,0.000097223165,0.00039664644,0.00017605453],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991977,0.00031644,0.00024232164,0.00020614293,0.000026490126,0.000010861827],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022508344,0.000056217883,0.00018346641,0.000015803123,0.0002664923,0.000013203697,0.00032506743,0.000013617021,0.00044439064],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00012934313,0.00003584905,0.000094726165,0.00050882803,0.00006700103,0.00008142447,0.000053197036,0.00014311008,0.0000025697757],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000056597996,0.000027439768,0.00068942836,0.00022450366,0.000013361254,6.981658e-7,0.003943354,0.0000026748653,0.000025874979,0.97465247,0.00020548275,0.020209048],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009777052,0.000029218976,0.0010287932,0.00029033038,0.00003978163,0.0000011730489,0.00023846864,0.0000022073557,0.0000036110443,0.0005202174,0.99770993,0.00003847765],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04615467,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008626954,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9975045,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007864637,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006972699,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9601971},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4395099524","doi":"10.1017/9781839704444.010","title":"Remembering and Celebrating the International Society of Family Law at Our Golden Jubilee","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Art history; Genealogy; History; Art; Political science","score_opus":0.040094118637564194,"score_gpt":0.3184921331584627,"score_spread":0.2783980145208985,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4395099524","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00071875605,0.00011844429,0.000014685498,0.002497387,0.000644342,0.00012653293,0.000010565439,0.00018170592,0.9956876],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.009115423,0.00082319556,0.00021980853,0.00028630573,0.0009083314,0.0000072947805,0.0000030161693,0.00009258201,0.98854405],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993071,0.000020070898,0.00011858689,0.00014001841,0.00030375776,0.00011047388],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99968916,0.000048963833,0.0001186354,0.000089371104,0.000027165343,0.000026713338],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00036445394,0.00007452477,0.000103630584,0.000017704082,0.00019986193,0.00005209981,0.00016986138,0.00012400368,0.00036145785],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000013457508,0.000054883465,0.00007559352,0.000064959095,0.00009530495,0.000039357503,0.00013306286,0.00007991848,0.000018888151],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000014719524,0.000005701605,0.0006291943,0.000017763736,0.000085381005,4.1533897e-7,0.0046412693,8.486687e-7,0.00032940507,0.03288862,0.9582474,0.0031525057],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006528822,0.00000417464,0.00025293967,0.00005637637,0.000010044838,1.6532731e-7,0.0048367716,0.000052351883,0.000018976001,0.00007066743,0.99456644,0.00006582918],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.025267227,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08758612,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06231889,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000058685684,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003486841,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9812236},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4395458534","doi":"10.1515/9780228020219","title":"The Notwithstanding Clause and the Canadian Charter","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"McGill-Queen's University Press eBooks","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.01566150267862535,"score_gpt":0.22838482380273958,"score_spread":0.21272332112411424,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4395458534","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000062817767,0.000017797798,0.0000025680997,0.0052696387,0.0006362382,0.0005588496,0.00017560483,0.0000967988,0.99323624],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0050788205,0.0007312264,0.00000336285,0.00023106339,0.0003317707,0.0000021899789,0.000007147475,0.000025513296,0.9935889],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99843323,0.00023237572,0.00013911205,0.00033945544,0.0004203812,0.00043545308],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99889576,0.0002966092,0.00011028712,0.00031403522,0.00011313619,0.00027015057],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006652222,0.00022205278,0.00022872792,0.00013366588,0.0053739394,0.00041829518,0.00047949632,0.00035876615,0.000020491923],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000023099501,0.00015603554,0.00015059054,0.000030992655,0.0012070057,0.000094263654,0.00019401482,0.0006318534,0.000013439636],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000044073753,0.0000010621999,0.0000014857934,0.000015295653,0.00010564459,0.000052944248,0.0040319134,2.1753321e-7,8.384759e-8,0.9674958,0.026683824,0.0015676512],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003501537,0.0000129764285,0.000007719322,0.00009766535,0.00020577238,8.972357e-7,0.0007448453,0.0000095622745,0.0000014398529,0.0020425213,0.996323,0.0002034392],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.39682052,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.063344136,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9696392,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009925255,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00057884224,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99592096},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396513459","doi":"10.4324/9781003496434-6","title":"Walking the Law throughout the Journey of Nishiyuu","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.045238641089262704,"score_gpt":0.3410663951454087,"score_spread":0.29582775405614603,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396513459","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000011749562,0.0019600876,0.000014090144,0.016913151,0.0010458442,0.00021035135,0.00000917945,0.000064046166,0.9797715],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.05847727,0.0013029074,0.000009389013,0.00085126405,0.0013264769,0.0000035851263,0.0000020378488,0.000022876733,0.9380042],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988535,0.00003420797,0.0002449018,0.00016216093,0.00054127787,0.00016393446],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992382,0.00022860669,0.00013779517,0.00027125064,0.000088666224,0.000035517958],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008972198,0.00013352935,0.00017172174,0.00002252775,0.0006663499,0.00019914415,0.00042610933,0.0001998066,0.0024757793],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000014866229,0.00006466818,0.00023665308,0.000038021193,0.0006866666,0.00007525412,0.000098399454,0.00041035388,0.00016003878],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001562064,0.0000020304365,0.0000012276689,0.0000072268654,0.00006264221,0.0000015328503,0.011227644,2.3833674e-7,0.00000198937,0.97828126,0.0057178293,0.0046948236],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021048221,0.000011158964,0.0000054709103,0.00007012097,0.0000873705,0.0000010524983,0.0012615224,0.0000023344912,0.0000072628304,0.17411387,0.82434464,0.000074172494],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005058279,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0135950595,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8186268,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004826783,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000109023174,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9984361},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396686538","doi":"10.29173/mlj1149","title":"Hugh A. Robson – A Labour Jurist Ahead of his Time","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Winnipeg; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Keynesian economics","score_opus":0.025588707846138765,"score_gpt":0.2703114869458497,"score_spread":0.24472277909971096,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396686538","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8091698,0.00031284717,0.00016207207,0.025992692,0.00066924695,0.00016523847,0.000016436408,0.00008995642,0.1634217],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967,0.00010771004,0.00023348974,0.0007145556,0.0018200906,0.0000010933497,0.000001211316,0.000011358766,0.00041048878],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987658,0.00013698846,0.00027699975,0.00011709262,0.00045879418,0.00024427794],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992909,0.00004038087,0.00018820007,0.00007615566,0.00016132662,0.00024303308],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004583963,0.00008680025,0.00018248035,0.000029734905,0.00069579075,0.00013847771,0.00024570752,0.00007744164,0.0012761079],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006599024,0.000083110135,0.00011856417,0.00018694538,0.00015275103,0.00024094015,0.000035142144,0.00024143101,0.00017536929],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00046895002,0.000570497,0.014024415,0.00012859772,0.00035689975,0.00035156615,0.065143146,0.000090148606,0.011275328,0.51381165,0.06696287,0.32681596],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037088426,0.00014695336,0.0026011856,0.000026353477,0.000027424527,0.0000128782485,0.0046607084,0.000061118655,0.00032134494,0.0011162135,0.9905343,0.000120644414],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015900321,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.028074192,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9235714,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000076786506,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000888201,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996369},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396880097","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198816713.002.0009","title":"Note on the Text","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Information retrieval","score_opus":0.022366345624006658,"score_gpt":0.3081068980970454,"score_spread":0.28574055247303876,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396880097","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000026821292,0.000041221883,0.000024926967,0.009908403,0.00071779074,0.00020098282,0.0000026863074,0.00011131018,0.98899],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0010080467,0.00016977686,0.000010033477,0.0011481382,0.00089103857,0.0000035198339,8.62683e-7,0.000051077786,0.9967175],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999509,0.00004331859,0.00003846445,0.00009651634,0.00021052625,0.0001021958],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99969447,0.00007214123,0.000039785937,0.00016433038,0.00000752218,0.000021766118],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00016700356,0.00005788592,0.00006458221,0.000031406027,0.000101563994,0.000038733586,0.00015054712,0.00014173712,0.032229323],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000020708547,0.00003296403,0.00004412693,0.000052662635,0.000062394254,0.000008366514,0.000011809005,0.000085896696,0.0064760502],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[5.018397e-7,0.0000037385537,0.0000037822165,8.364776e-7,0.0000035747773,1.1899801e-7,0.0004616136,2.1658508e-8,4.8478785e-7,0.21392903,0.77795917,0.007637135],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002436787,0.000008983638,0.000021506205,0.000020405923,0.000003483817,1.7766194e-8,0.00016636329,0.0000010683499,0.0000011977027,0.000105015315,0.999594,0.000053645093],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009783076,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008258402,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22163478,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000020048945,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000054172368,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99681085},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396974789","doi":"10.1017/9781009354059.016","title":"Cambridge Studies in International and Comparative Law","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.14899324870604902,"score_gpt":0.43985146440135275,"score_spread":0.29085821569530373,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396974789","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00007119092,0.003946393,0.0000016189189,0.0011099082,0.0010440521,0.00009045485,0.000009433473,0.00006951341,0.9936574],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.026530916,0.0018732202,0.000032498137,0.00011033792,0.00044501788,0.000007128275,0.0000023486277,0.00001795235,0.9709806],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996077,0.000024150477,0.0000636396,0.00012179465,0.00011896864,0.00006373626],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998947,0.000021311556,0.000021758724,0.00002915318,0.000014519023,0.000018568],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00011337142,0.000057321184,0.00011516748,0.00008010197,0.000025906722,0.000039311533,0.00004748999,0.00006134604,0.0006388024],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000045642296,0.0000484269,0.000015124208,0.000049569713,0.0002442383,0.00002698778,0.000034042965,0.00006624481,0.00012001974],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[8.2364477e-7,0.0000047537524,0.00002922839,0.000008485509,0.000042544194,0.00000376755,0.00865329,1.3267557e-8,2.6696262e-7,0.51633555,0.47471458,0.00020667701],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000048869475,0.0000045979987,0.000034919634,0.000104478015,0.000005749306,2.1994663e-7,0.0074715605,0.0000023529246,5.2979095e-7,0.00046464175,0.99180615,0.00005590551],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022330701,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14493783,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5170916,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004194569,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000015368716,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9841797},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4398135016","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198833949.002.0005","title":"Note to the Reader","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.02822240224242628,"score_gpt":0.32686747043806974,"score_spread":0.29864506819564346,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4398135016","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[1.8706474e-7,0.000059635535,0.00051647617,0.08432675,0.00050296006,0.00018018398,0.0000041853377,0.00016723042,0.9142424],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00016042619,0.000106330524,0.00019327026,0.0047410843,0.0025714457,0.000006479375,0.0000016321961,0.000052816562,0.9921665],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995127,0.000033602184,0.000044211793,0.00011044099,0.00019582946,0.000103252234],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99977505,0.000016119815,0.000023386096,0.00010613916,0.000007124376,0.00007218843],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00010018164,0.000053516487,0.000066600056,0.000022549975,0.00011082617,0.000043445936,0.00017384985,0.00010192373,0.02048323],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002982459,0.00003359997,0.000035323228,0.00011843212,0.000036812566,0.000008555614,0.00002530442,0.00007073716,0.0021724296],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[5.7602034e-7,0.0000015749562,0.0000032451503,0.0000010076991,0.00000415705,4.7007998e-7,0.0040398263,3.8705377e-8,8.3681266e-7,0.014688425,0.9669075,0.014352347],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015579044,0.000006246507,0.00002451498,0.000008589316,0.000005789298,3.25766e-8,0.0003502124,7.969663e-7,9.214356e-7,0.000029235307,0.99950314,0.00005495489],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018358761,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.051597465,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.079585664,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000014209145,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000052812265,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986045},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4398482850","doi":"10.7910/dvn/nzk4op","title":"Petition of Zoheth Smith","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"dataset","venue":"Harvard Dataverse","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Genealogy; Computer science; History","score_opus":0.020264571972668437,"score_gpt":0.29374063393559674,"score_spread":0.2734760619629283,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4398482850","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"dataset","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"dataset","genre_consensus":"dataset","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000046270394,0.0000016318161,0.000015342335,0.000018135928,0.0010810129,0.00018847361,0.991947,0.000034347722,0.00666781],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.000034688746,0.001679167,0.00008474174,0.000085994834,0.0011241257,0.0000075679623,0.995965,0.000008660102,0.0010100248],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985495,0.00015186807,0.00025511268,0.00027212157,0.0005349769,0.00023641656],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987548,0.000059830094,0.00027773326,0.00062600255,0.00017000853,0.00011162613],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006516697,0.00014448808,0.00023810744,0.00013369902,0.0002644062,0.00005889225,0.00045655336,0.00028122464,0.044052836],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021893122,0.0001493097,0.000099789606,0.00016922872,0.00044241594,0.0002463926,0.00013242714,0.00017554713,0.01945241],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019340476,0.00005030549,0.0000063852326,0.000052560827,0.000024901388,0.000005934768,0.00029746705,9.4327845e-8,0.0000036235608,0.00032138746,0.9989285,0.000289508],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016799528,0.000062203726,0.000061530365,0.00010965172,0.00008821675,8.368842e-7,0.00022328224,0.0000010413702,0.000009725506,0.00005344413,0.9990657,0.00015639249],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009441027,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0047451886,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024600424,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000081706195,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00034874608,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9971552},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4398772153","doi":"10.1093/9780191956942.003.0025","title":"Techniques of Judicial Avoidance","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.02204779829027288,"score_gpt":0.3061508557356381,"score_spread":0.28410305744536524,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4398772153","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000007278322,0.0005977269,0.00005344223,0.00095273793,0.00042394633,0.00015439595,0.000013204148,0.00022028762,0.99757695],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0052462374,0.0013249151,0.00014412554,0.00007667606,0.001021114,0.0000034631473,0.00000294843,0.000017775854,0.99216276],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99923885,0.000005796251,0.00018767644,0.0001585021,0.0003080628,0.00010108777],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99965525,0.000030328589,0.000082102386,0.000110451736,0.0000829178,0.000038952097],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00024616544,0.00009735042,0.00017914505,0.00009053832,0.00008959857,0.000025597694,0.00012674749,0.000271816,0.0025440385],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000009328365,0.00009165866,0.00012629222,0.000025615665,0.0002407274,0.000041598865,0.00003643692,0.00017386516,0.00013740762],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000022160195,0.0000024462497,0.0000012119466,0.000015440057,0.000014361561,0.0000024546757,0.00073763024,6.9642314e-9,0.000024151725,0.96473396,0.006838647,0.027627489],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009348118,0.000022584316,0.000002022716,0.0001311485,0.000024033752,1.905254e-7,0.000037740934,3.5212108e-7,0.00015332353,0.1586302,0.84090453,0.00008453934],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016140454,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023620164,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.83406585,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000051628933,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012801777,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9983678},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399020562","doi":"10.1017/9781108694131.051","title":"13 November 1749. Cleland to Lovel Stanhope","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy","score_opus":0.020072833684840086,"score_gpt":0.3335509538343557,"score_spread":0.3134781201495156,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399020562","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000029420215,0.00045668523,0.00021522238,0.0033573643,0.0016199526,0.0002870473,0.000041638392,0.0003741507,0.99361855],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00052685454,0.0002025688,0.00017058403,0.00076733157,0.0018217325,0.000008975634,0.000004770285,0.00018710787,0.99631006],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989705,0.000024639876,0.0001154753,0.00028810927,0.00035920116,0.00024207307],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995922,0.000015127572,0.000035355457,0.00017337633,0.000025206093,0.00015872881],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00021081627,0.00013676091,0.00016553924,0.00014579474,0.000058667792,0.0001597102,0.00015808758,0.00025713976,0.055188622],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000018394334,0.00011517005,0.00007465773,0.00022749613,0.000055819,0.000030502797,0.000055488366,0.00012819537,0.011733074],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000023717064,0.000011469125,0.00003752102,0.000014175449,0.00002774341,0.00000470879,0.0014823525,9.613385e-8,0.000003275473,0.022044377,0.9722338,0.0041381237],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006121342,0.000017863138,0.000057050678,0.00008516116,0.00002145857,2.2775333e-7,0.00034893063,8.665743e-7,0.0000013888123,0.00028996248,0.99894,0.0001758838],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.030011775,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15317419,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12316241,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006275237,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000101741396,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9890364},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399169272","doi":"10.25148/lawrev.18.4.6","title":"\"Bricolage\" as Comparative Research Method For Critical Legislative Innovation","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"FIU Law Review","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Bricolage; Legislature; Mediation; Interpretation (philosophy); Creativity; Context (archaeology); Documentation; Sociology; Epistemology; Politics; Political science; Law and economics; Law; Social science; Computer science","score_opus":0.3736235350714559,"score_gpt":0.6193453327188024,"score_spread":0.24572179764734653,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399169272","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00006122131,0.063849345,0.020951174,0.05292279,0.00066444906,0.0020774049,0.00003163466,0.00015284828,0.8592891],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6199813,0.117581286,0.105624184,0.03263974,0.011459679,0.006198253,0.0004175733,0.00019593502,0.10590205],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979734,0.0007507545,0.000280301,0.000261169,0.0004563338,0.00027807298],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99705315,0.0019720239,0.000029047487,0.00011963244,0.0007655182,0.0000606264],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005575489,0.00007880593,0.0002389089,0.00008048143,0.00063662877,0.00019343494,0.00013570316,0.00006993505,0.0005314371],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0012181426,0.00006847692,0.000083842926,0.0014155889,0.00026969097,0.00032221442,0.000030985055,0.00023873258,0.000261506],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003886666,0.000016011178,5.565775e-7,0.0006112404,0.000012804719,0.0000020471493,0.0034887614,5.9390384e-8,0.000031595733,0.9504267,0.022401445,0.023004923],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003861761,0.00008281537,0.000006778221,0.001613417,0.000027883476,0.0000011587418,0.00020708155,0.000097410775,0.00004814831,0.055594116,0.94220495,0.000077593184],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015772533,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005775605,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91980356,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000113217844,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00031534088,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5818864},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399173316","doi":"10.3138/utlj_2023_0163","title":"Private international law’s ambivalent humanism","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Ambivalence; Humanism; Law; Political science; Philosophy; Sociology; Psychoanalysis; Psychology","score_opus":0.015077751754143142,"score_gpt":0.2671355663726974,"score_spread":0.25205781461855425,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399173316","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018368823,0.00071557285,0.0007841223,0.0024988807,0.0018803779,0.00005077443,0.000008063175,0.000055233297,0.97563815],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99032336,0.0011520649,0.00037586907,0.000059063233,0.0004878293,1.9291779e-8,0.0000014792556,0.0000037434663,0.007596592],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99934256,0.000049868828,0.00008336177,0.0000857071,0.0003209301,0.00011758237],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99970216,0.000020072783,0.000051351006,0.000051527684,0.00008493492,0.00008994353],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00031624385,0.000045871304,0.00006842981,0.000016088343,0.00070579135,0.00010857453,0.00025296494,0.000047245878,0.0051757],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000040554705,0.000051420702,0.00010597861,0.000016135622,0.00020199637,0.00068582856,0.000046262005,0.00010410898,0.000019948142],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014233389,0.000023440834,0.000056145098,0.0000039868523,0.000057610985,0.000047671612,0.011335407,0.0000028241047,0.00014191645,0.98134756,0.0013606456,0.0056085587],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001520893,0.0000320073,0.000614104,0.0000474342,0.000022463008,0.0000075837775,0.0034464155,0.00003492603,0.000022435406,0.0026235336,0.99294007,0.000056919303],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08148535,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1934053,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9915794,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00041159347,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000050856208,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9957337},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400314006","doi":"10.7202/1111680ar","title":"Plurifiliation et multiple parentage : réflexions de droit comparé","year":2023,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue de droit Université de Sherbrooke","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Biology","score_opus":0.021441562431827807,"score_gpt":0.263249378109552,"score_spread":0.2418078156777242,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400314006","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7741495,0.0011925941,0.004834481,0.017897898,0.0017215749,0.0005891456,0.000204305,0.00063565036,0.19877487],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7601131,0.0035692889,0.00039405466,0.0004739052,0.00053754606,0.000009023813,0.00013909675,0.00004113576,0.23472281],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977228,0.00029569652,0.00028803103,0.0004371413,0.00032213124,0.000934199],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986748,0.00027547203,0.00017826195,0.00031673827,0.000092226546,0.0004624904],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009245544,0.00022393542,0.00030537328,0.0002232694,0.00093504647,0.00009866898,0.00040738517,0.0003898389,0.0009372343],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000098308505,0.00035532177,0.00028522464,0.0009812535,0.00024477905,0.00039006653,0.0001577698,0.00039021793,0.00069854036],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001604863,0.00029488292,0.06245633,0.00033331814,0.00019598099,0.00048012333,0.05412325,0.00571771,0.003031713,0.8422176,0.016739193,0.014249378],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00095198693,0.00009646637,0.06453,0.0003313742,0.00018513383,0.000031638683,0.004590836,0.031073464,0.000384117,0.010639597,0.88676167,0.00042373696],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008456264,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020117346,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8700225,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0051754634,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00038757335,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99997604},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401263543","doi":"10.5040/9798400678127","title":"Legal Systems of the World","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"ABC-CLIO eBooks","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Business","score_opus":0.025528425547619533,"score_gpt":0.2696205801807139,"score_spread":0.24409215463309436,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401263543","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00011051522,0.0005309466,0.0000024198814,0.00021688541,0.0023837453,0.00050312007,0.00002220638,0.000068021036,0.9961621],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.029059257,0.000042775042,0.000003749059,0.00010758144,0.0014911117,0.000018215647,0.0000027110966,0.00002832975,0.96924627],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99819225,0.00014781822,0.00038987023,0.00024278928,0.0007397845,0.0002874807],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998815,0.00012957583,0.00039766877,0.0004404753,0.00012925157,0.00008802575],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00047115056,0.00018985466,0.00034138837,0.00013952874,0.00048014795,0.00011291186,0.0005422337,0.00028973844,0.0003501635],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000024489646,0.0001475752,0.00028218015,0.00007905053,0.0005065524,0.00004895834,0.000083511826,0.00038565963,0.00009091398],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000067835135,0.000016617618,0.000065967535,0.00007037501,0.00007919163,0.0000073597844,0.0035762645,0.0000018498084,0.000016145823,0.7378944,0.2520695,0.006195495],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010374201,0.000017080069,0.000048212296,0.00028374593,0.00006395916,0.0000014218141,0.000103352075,0.000003966278,0.00001623594,0.00076701294,0.9984291,0.00016216509],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037794558,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009858485,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7463596,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020078842,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004832712,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.60179424},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401374673","doi":"10.30722/slr.19771","title":"Interpreting Discrimination Law Creatively: Statutory Discrimination Law in the UK, Canada and Australia by Alice Taylor","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"˜The œSydney law review.","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statutory law; Law; Alice (programming language); Statutory interpretation; Political science; Law reform; Project commissioning; Sociology; Publishing; History; Art history","score_opus":0.028665098347608685,"score_gpt":0.33385518813652304,"score_spread":0.3051900897889144,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401374673","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06365494,0.06295792,0.0006088328,0.0930438,0.0033103647,0.0049446695,0.00051718456,0.00026852882,0.7706938],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.990808,0.0021548811,0.000012197984,0.00525323,0.00014525508,0.00008448725,0.000051538074,0.000012513856,0.0014778847],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99795276,0.0006454859,0.00034020763,0.0002833392,0.0004983572,0.00027985012],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991813,0.00038370074,0.00010273758,0.00018870362,0.00006640227,0.00007716446],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018726574,0.0001597649,0.00019425414,0.000019037414,0.00063664396,0.00030896396,0.0002760503,0.00006231997,0.00012670441],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006334182,0.00010186545,0.00006016293,0.00025684113,0.0004195199,0.00035752243,0.000045511177,0.00026868875,0.0000069980174],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000044407466,0.0000182402,0.000108331486,0.00032900285,0.000015131636,0.0000063871003,0.012928614,3.3506265e-7,0.00005711483,0.96239704,0.0180349,0.006100439],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006262503,0.000023395425,0.00047138584,0.0009635772,0.000086117296,0.0000028536551,0.0019756164,0.000045400968,0.000030816314,0.0015079449,0.9946831,0.00014717007],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9164482,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9828845,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9766482,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002715321,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011152211,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.48966148},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401713962","doi":"","title":"Multicultural Odysseys: The Role of International Institutions and Legal Norms","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Multiculturalism; Political science; Sociology; Law and economics; Law","score_opus":0.01284401661251711,"score_gpt":0.26536986083418784,"score_spread":0.25252584422167074,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401713962","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6186091,0.00046346587,0.0054898346,0.015005113,0.00019893322,0.00017695273,0.000009206164,0.00006348697,0.35998395],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99372506,0.0002679436,0.0018598606,0.00004962042,0.0000380813,0.000004507617,0.000017109045,0.0000038398534,0.00403395],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987358,0.0005027051,0.00019629602,0.0001412327,0.00027501606,0.00014895078],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982644,0.00048778782,0.00012328986,0.000237715,0.0008111177,0.00007570722],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030323195,0.00006456048,0.000072800016,0.00005357759,0.00061896525,0.00013220757,0.00034193005,0.000056194276,0.0000715966],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00067395135,0.00005018069,0.000049854785,0.00020899046,0.000491834,0.00023561294,0.0001061797,0.00011322391,0.0000056559597],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007133205,0.00012300123,0.006291559,0.0000027594874,0.000020355339,7.198736e-7,0.04258497,0.0000027313506,0.004727331,0.889121,0.000065012704,0.057053458],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003128235,3.3944218e-7,0.043084946,0.00009574597,0.00001551784,0.0000057040925,0.008036697,0.0007612908,0.01513929,0.00079700147,0.93163,0.00012063712],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009190384,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02662664,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.931565,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000043672164,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000086254695,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9974075},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401724100","doi":"10.1093/law-ocl/9780198815426.003.0012","title":"Accountability, Private Rights of Action, and Canadian Competition Institutions","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Competition law; Enforcement; Damages; Accountability; Agency (philosophy); Dominance (genetics); Competition (biology); Political science; Law and economics; Business; Law; Economics; Sociology; Market economy","score_opus":0.04865185703594416,"score_gpt":0.26617736540937703,"score_spread":0.21752550837343287,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401724100","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.003909785,0.000017555414,0.000042665506,0.000072928,0.00026886616,0.000356925,0.0001645104,0.000035774618,0.995131],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.14651857,0.00040359137,0.00003679695,0.000022792286,0.00009984384,2.9117973e-7,0.00003954794,0.0000086430555,0.8528699],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992812,0.000030499346,0.00011472214,0.00021161127,0.00020383873,0.0001581],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993201,0.00003223259,0.00013785205,0.0001898072,0.00015869836,0.00016130654],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00012325242,0.00012325478,0.00018618042,0.00017710391,0.0006444901,0.0000345813,0.00017447605,0.00029709365,0.00011631575],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000003649556,0.00014822309,0.00007114434,0.000010081049,0.0004981602,0.00016757395,0.000065263106,0.00018139245,0.0000011045128],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014190007,0.0000039452684,0.000055155608,0.000025783635,0.000032155225,0.0000028371326,0.00090482534,0.0000014755858,0.0000048463903,0.9978049,0.000109915556,0.0010400051],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001714209,0.000021250296,0.00024442977,0.000075252945,0.0000736906,8.1016645e-7,0.000106746425,0.0000031252778,0.000011485227,0.0022324163,0.9969136,0.00014578208],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.22470696,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5813381,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9968037,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00035105093,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006304125,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.78045577},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401745632","doi":"10.1515/9789888455676-008","title":"Chapter 6: Lessons from Law Reform in Ontario and Elsewhere in Canada","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Hong Kong University Press eBooks","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law","score_opus":0.030410200774152418,"score_gpt":0.21052474728259724,"score_spread":0.18011454650844483,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401745632","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013420464,0.00004673122,0.0000035019257,0.00021445914,0.00017793495,0.00019349121,0.000038894595,0.000021426264,0.9858831],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.27765864,0.00016496897,0.000016553991,0.00008203481,0.00006271666,3.7167655e-7,0.000014025833,0.000015077324,0.7219856],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99893665,0.000036066343,0.00014997213,0.00035071804,0.00027612058,0.00025044568],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994572,0.00004984432,0.000117862764,0.0001987947,0.000044879267,0.00013142164],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00013494259,0.00018702427,0.00029331268,0.00008556975,0.0002328045,0.00004204539,0.00023481286,0.00026626984,0.00016109103],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000019919323,0.00022632911,0.000042156702,0.0000063156444,0.00019831437,0.00008919688,0.00013730355,0.0004894185,0.0000014946755],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000333469,0.0000027289748,0.0008743708,0.000006114663,0.000021943246,0.00013740179,0.005584213,0.0000014940294,0.0000014626545,0.98557156,0.000036543508,0.00772879],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00038738255,0.000010212527,0.004421149,0.00017451904,0.000026778565,3.6644505e-7,0.00068039104,0.0000061609517,0.000002893301,0.0008727472,0.9931598,0.00025762644],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99981934,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.999993,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99312323,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029586798,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008367493,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9229433},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401784187","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780192870360.013.4","title":"The Contractual Lens","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Lens (geology); Business; Optometry; Optics; Medicine; Physics","score_opus":0.030856379468928833,"score_gpt":0.2424374595201694,"score_spread":0.21158108005124057,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401784187","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000018607701,0.0002855098,0.000013434016,0.00048975163,0.00075595366,0.00026052602,0.000053654847,0.00016481079,0.99795777],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0012563503,0.0026473626,0.0000043539844,0.00004356324,0.00044298556,3.8156642e-7,0.000005051381,0.000019627552,0.9955803],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990492,0.00002678328,0.00010493275,0.00023688165,0.00033464734,0.00024756946],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99933654,0.00016652855,0.000093188144,0.00022237391,0.000091530346,0.000089827685],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00021988459,0.00015878578,0.00015214042,0.000052239535,0.0011592903,0.00017110359,0.00038628333,0.00030744498,0.000072050025],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00000800527,0.00014135826,0.00018938178,0.0000055442724,0.0005223152,0.000079392834,0.0001402351,0.0004054793,0.000008030257],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027149812,0.0000017047224,2.933346e-7,0.000006035903,0.000080670136,0.000044268778,0.0017722182,2.0259938e-7,8.3258334e-7,0.97889173,0.005179374,0.013995517],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010273378,0.000021766278,0.0000018257227,0.000050872248,0.00013498872,8.949733e-7,0.0003748207,0.0000045746892,0.0000022474026,0.004093446,0.99504477,0.00016707575],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00063891,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019464815,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98986536,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016957425,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00016986654,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8916441},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402217647","doi":"10.7202/1110209ar","title":"Chronique de jurisprudence en droit international privé","year":2022,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue québécoise de droit international","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Political science; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.012153924499546706,"score_gpt":0.28363083891843244,"score_spread":0.2714769144188857,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402217647","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.30523464,0.0020443725,0.010303052,0.1123072,0.020423628,0.0007116462,0.00073019706,0.00028928652,0.547956],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85110766,0.0024591906,0.0010682233,0.0023008317,0.005590685,0.00024358415,0.00016684129,0.000055293087,0.13700771],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965732,0.00041719156,0.0006078662,0.0006042085,0.0011247145,0.00067278463],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984356,0.000312882,0.0003907225,0.00030353817,0.00025479967,0.00030245088],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017526103,0.0002632312,0.00027546682,0.00028071145,0.00063308707,0.00022420697,0.0016787809,0.00022457019,0.012926916],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00029703003,0.00040629026,0.00034868377,0.00039545033,0.00027956633,0.00057095743,0.0003764825,0.00088065286,0.00023309301],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011214567,0.00058901147,0.004969647,0.000043064614,0.0002942843,0.00026588392,0.020587036,0.0021999378,0.0005817247,0.9173853,0.009979654,0.042992327],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00047425472,0.00012243453,0.0062256237,0.00012708789,0.000058200294,0.0003865985,0.0010588054,0.01357195,0.000087854074,0.02969446,0.94779915,0.00039356676],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01241697,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005300887,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93781954,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008126625,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014763909,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998389},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402272772","doi":"10.26443/law.v69i1.1370","title":"Mathur v. Ontario","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.027966647036996067,"score_gpt":0.3052310094489832,"score_spread":0.2772643624119871,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402272772","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014734265,0.00024592897,0.000034589753,0.0028553822,0.0021054402,0.00003879221,0.0000034266384,0.00008774566,0.9798944],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9877501,0.000110687986,0.0001221711,0.00017454465,0.00081063027,0.0000011587223,4.5201492e-7,0.000007512599,0.0110227065],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992547,0.000045626897,0.00012821807,0.00008743766,0.00028482417,0.00019917192],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99972135,0.000028123195,0.000023091676,0.00004961365,0.00004436969,0.00013344134],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00055615517,0.00005221137,0.000064269836,0.000037442984,0.0029480443,0.00029332718,0.000102653474,0.00005265181,0.0029444438],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000008767926,0.00004485739,0.00008827924,0.00008911453,0.00006839114,0.00029722304,0.000014269444,0.0002772307,0.00023278141],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003381852,0.0000115185085,0.000100756035,0.000002274213,0.00001802339,0.00008689406,0.0030881802,8.589959e-7,0.0000194553,0.9709866,0.0016501052,0.02403193],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000053452182,0.00002159672,0.00028563754,0.000032011783,0.000012112056,0.000059636834,0.00024902355,0.000005611252,0.000025930309,0.0051493854,0.9940441,0.000061453335],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11713566,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.81036294,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99239403,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003007828,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000051123367,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99834996},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402655455","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198907329.003.0021","title":"Common Law Jurisdictions","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Law and economics; Business; Sociology","score_opus":0.028002825997369356,"score_gpt":0.30989713818558723,"score_spread":0.28189431218821787,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402655455","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000002965779,0.00070784247,0.000015159715,0.004444075,0.0016534947,0.00018694616,0.000033022534,0.0005252304,0.9924313],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0056708604,0.00088884856,0.000023007718,0.00046423354,0.0014080266,0.0000067613255,0.000023331435,0.00003737964,0.99147755],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989509,0.000010461664,0.00021095149,0.00025633554,0.0003799918,0.0001913544],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99949753,0.000054138225,0.00005205578,0.00020898847,0.000060183953,0.00012710309],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00021560525,0.00016413798,0.000198303,0.00009213375,0.00056948187,0.00017706478,0.00015848468,0.00039075987,0.009242142],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000017467503,0.00015818317,0.00020644658,0.000032642518,0.00033338176,0.00009028851,0.000055094908,0.00037054732,0.003243356],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000012799574,0.0000047002704,8.807649e-7,0.000007298291,0.000037938484,0.000009349922,0.001300022,1.5727944e-7,6.3601334e-7,0.9759684,0.019052189,0.003617108],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002266516,0.000014951297,0.0000014517526,0.000050524195,0.00006271659,9.5247276e-7,0.00005318312,0.0000023065252,0.0000010342069,0.25787753,0.7417766,0.00013609683],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0053066057,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.041826155,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7227244,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013496436,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010402821,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9975327},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403085703","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2023-0074","title":"Family lawyers on cohabitation and judge-made law","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Cohabitation; Law; Political science; Family law; Sociology","score_opus":0.013498242166093787,"score_gpt":0.25600637802477283,"score_spread":0.24250813585867903,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403085703","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15505332,0.0019088736,0.00028049506,0.002142068,0.00068511884,0.00007859245,0.000007875774,0.000053200445,0.83979046],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99717516,0.0010164198,0.00016212398,0.00011992664,0.00015536607,1.9286768e-8,7.576559e-7,0.000003306964,0.0013668982],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994264,0.00007309545,0.000066288725,0.000091043476,0.00023126551,0.00011186665],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997005,0.000050530296,0.00004114324,0.000041490137,0.000062531304,0.000103798724],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00031693533,0.0000485324,0.000076761775,0.0000167697,0.0007685504,0.00008263817,0.00008893147,0.000057792102,0.0002752677],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000005928247,0.00005298241,0.000058127614,0.000024650688,0.00026259062,0.0005610234,0.000015187982,0.0001001398,0.000008161671],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000044380537,0.000021016918,0.00010115287,0.000009795984,0.00003690724,0.000028014321,0.018677857,0.000007365439,0.00037581284,0.96466523,0.0017144978,0.014317969],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002682524,0.00014502996,0.0036513344,0.00009548017,0.000040629053,0.0000049375117,0.016104475,0.00006571694,0.000020050824,0.0015229329,0.9779966,0.000084572406],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10656919,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15944493,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9762821,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00022427272,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000047916947,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.89938027},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403110036","doi":"10.1017/cyl.2024.5","title":"Canadian Cases in Private International Law in 2023","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Yearbook of international Law/Annuaire canadien de droit international","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Thompson Rivers University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Conflict of laws; Political science; Business","score_opus":0.01063988413388932,"score_gpt":0.26899013704301256,"score_spread":0.2583502529091232,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403110036","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10681275,0.00019738075,0.000013235666,0.019924015,0.0049104625,0.00030150704,0.0011576721,0.00004796383,0.866635],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97820306,0.00013131977,0.00012172593,0.0017781908,0.00085721456,0.00005738318,0.00026245927,0.00003654476,0.018552076],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972871,0.00008129822,0.00062091305,0.0005023697,0.0007282664,0.0007800703],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983246,0.00016545918,0.00009782819,0.00019849677,0.0003602852,0.0008533721],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008923607,0.00022361164,0.0002366369,0.0018282793,0.0001612299,0.00032517273,0.0011786179,0.000259598,0.003052284],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00030593885,0.00029978686,0.00014791341,0.00042835192,0.00031418932,0.0007235171,0.00005519257,0.0004434645,0.000112681606],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020850812,0.000024567737,0.016553465,0.0000095771675,0.00010878659,0.0017865874,0.0023074087,0.00014648364,0.000023607456,0.97457254,0.00234615,0.002099959],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003473823,0.000025073461,0.012051131,0.00038306945,0.0000096359645,0.00008380017,0.0006361118,0.0015828933,0.000036491096,0.013746665,0.97077125,0.00032650187],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9923536,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99973565,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9684251,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013146322,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004134538,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999454},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403306459","doi":"10.1017/9781009302180.046","title":"A Formal Proof of Correctness","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Correctness; Computer science; Programming language; Formal proof; Mathematics; Mathematical proof; Geometry","score_opus":0.024185736557494692,"score_gpt":0.23629066049899453,"score_spread":0.21210492394149982,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403306459","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00017241634,0.00019236178,0.00015990752,0.000036606176,0.0007291815,0.00038964904,0.00015222332,0.00011157349,0.99805605],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.010934759,0.00009301312,0.000009604039,0.000011669728,0.00024699984,5.3491436e-7,0.000014242944,0.000022734652,0.9886664],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99895585,0.00002312009,0.00015699913,0.00026904722,0.00035595451,0.000239032],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992657,0.000044617434,0.0001639576,0.00021872118,0.00018795166,0.000119083175],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00019477883,0.00017902872,0.000279908,0.00015773364,0.0002597514,0.000037372236,0.0003218824,0.0003344102,0.000019506577],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000067473516,0.00021083711,0.00022395795,0.000012404633,0.00043955585,0.00012036255,0.0002033494,0.00029806493,0.000008600465],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000048123733,0.0000060095863,8.3477767e-7,0.000102986225,0.00007569829,0.00006159456,0.0010317096,6.320727e-7,0.000006566688,0.98435605,0.008419378,0.0058904206],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015928477,0.000044762917,0.0000032209455,0.00023578368,0.00019439364,0.0000022081017,0.00026671714,0.00002217069,0.00015689994,0.00005347604,0.9986505,0.00021058788],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015294491,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00010207184,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9902311,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017010434,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026229018,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8597688},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403729115","doi":"10.21991/cf29474","title":"The Place of Gladue in Constitutional Law","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Constitutional law","score_opus":0.016706125249959868,"score_gpt":0.2963097214409912,"score_spread":0.27960359619103137,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403729115","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0062562516,0.012125104,0.04155857,0.04116206,0.009138875,0.0013779603,0.00047498246,0.0004528041,0.8874534],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972947,0.00060095784,0.00019823614,0.000436999,0.00029736978,0.0000889916,0.000048438997,0.000007391748,0.0010268627],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.996953,0.00017853506,0.0007717941,0.00046642302,0.0008495883,0.0007806527],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980819,0.000986883,0.00012785174,0.00028657922,0.00031749601,0.00019928973],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014487947,0.00026145086,0.0002974932,0.00025440723,0.0026663684,0.00028788342,0.00045128513,0.00025171385,0.00027926892],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00047676818,0.00022011017,0.0002638966,0.0008154982,0.031203244,0.0008712641,0.000119361146,0.0004253307,0.00016792929],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000059362996,0.000070306254,0.002868321,0.000023933524,0.000060851267,0.00003647781,0.00034772776,0.0005295726,0.00008227659,0.9905774,0.0033597383,0.001984034],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000548071,0.00003105602,0.00020540041,0.00033736957,0.000030450608,0.00007449347,0.002373062,0.00070069416,0.000112229594,0.05903867,0.93627465,0.0002738521],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018066169,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010049297,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9910385,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00050062215,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0046853838,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.998632},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403807679","doi":"10.1017/cjlj.2024.19","title":"Marital Contracts on the Fault Lines: A Liberal Inquiry","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Hebrew University of Jerusalem; Bar-Ilan University; McGill University","keywords":"Fault (geology); Political science; Psychology; Business; Geology; Seismology","score_opus":0.04678743187483218,"score_gpt":0.3290234045316248,"score_spread":0.2822359726567926,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403807679","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7407029,0.007109819,0.00016269072,0.0842939,0.009894989,0.0004015543,0.00003822363,0.000068487614,0.15732741],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99339265,0.00019028691,0.000040095714,0.002308921,0.002397649,0.0000028598113,6.4151135e-7,0.000013614588,0.0016532817],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985264,0.00015134041,0.00032456956,0.00014246855,0.0004526693,0.0004025841],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985114,0.0004053128,0.00010657672,0.00014328664,0.00021427248,0.0006192043],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011756148,0.00011809331,0.00015854891,0.00012687134,0.0006745809,0.000667568,0.00046475464,0.00011717945,0.00048495],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00026881415,0.000084794505,0.00015761104,0.00027036414,0.00057603384,0.00048414298,0.000009789279,0.0005196379,0.00007950031],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030554635,0.000024689762,0.00059809425,0.000016592872,0.00008681983,0.0015119734,0.044179525,0.00003854859,0.0001248207,0.88304114,0.047206108,0.023141118],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009179899,0.00012002783,0.0013836398,0.00032303765,0.000027202914,0.00006134822,0.0011310286,0.00003986087,0.000046356305,0.0029773535,0.9936786,0.00011971062],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02892463,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1836081,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9464725,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024568615,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002230075,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97754186},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404213268","doi":"10.56553/popets-2025-0044","title":"Towards Privacy-preserving and Fairness-aware Federated Learning Framework","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings on Privacy Enhancing Technologies","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"Agence Nationale de la Recherche; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Consortium de Recherche et d’innovation en Aérospatiale au Québec","keywords":"History; Philosophy","score_opus":0.022409386602149473,"score_gpt":0.31280323082428646,"score_spread":0.290393844222137,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404213268","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9313424,0.0018053207,0.0067275492,0.028079728,0.0005717659,0.0005090495,0.0000019988734,0.01215668,0.018805495],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99483436,0.0017536915,0.0024222324,0.000062823485,0.00019334933,0.00007105008,0.000001551848,0.000042126394,0.0006188109],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99789584,0.000021245594,0.00031057987,0.00066312565,0.0005147855,0.0005944438],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99921274,0.00023457491,0.00010923595,0.00016308254,0.0002022167,0.000078119294],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00090101134,0.00026965328,0.00027885695,0.0003767017,0.0012851948,0.0013984725,0.0006567344,0.0005021447,0.0000584947],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0056152157,0.00025132234,0.00007281198,0.0010050993,0.0003240098,0.0007422506,0.0007805551,0.0010673933,0.000032234853],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000055482975,0.00006773274,0.0064149396,0.00065246416,0.0001148904,0.000029375786,0.04915721,0.0000054589736,0.010327307,0.35956576,0.002248652,0.5713607],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003110238,0.000538414,0.0017476078,0.004229683,0.00008554115,0.00001824548,0.07713161,0.0043027294,0.07847562,0.24132453,0.59055835,0.0012766741],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00025589397,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000029819732,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5883097,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002101258,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012897822,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999939},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404379895","doi":"10.1163/17087384-12340107","title":"Domination through Law: The Internationalization of Legal Norms in Postcolonial Africa, written by Mohamed Sesay","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"African Journal of Legal Studies","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"International law; Political science; Internationalization; Law; Public international law; International trade; Business","score_opus":0.02475017851912183,"score_gpt":0.33728173893948243,"score_spread":0.3125315604203606,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404379895","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7525275,0.023890814,0.0013974465,0.11470283,0.0033285285,0.0005372086,0.00004712189,0.000053136264,0.10351547],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970695,0.0010749971,0.00006978225,0.00009807377,0.00044957813,0.000006832683,0.0000014798976,0.0000077893,0.001222004],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983557,0.00019612271,0.00051397807,0.00011178058,0.00065011025,0.00017231585],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998808,0.00037786714,0.00028496145,0.00005818691,0.0004381881,0.000032777738],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012389662,0.0000978314,0.00024084783,0.00010558421,0.00024157825,0.00012774728,0.00022922331,0.000045962657,0.000027663304],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002770267,0.00006517872,0.000116539,0.0004890357,0.0004170719,0.00085390225,0.0000443887,0.00020569042,0.0000022068302],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021878416,0.00021190525,0.0015123865,0.000048007216,0.00053818943,0.00006580864,0.24650337,0.00011271464,0.0014237028,0.7191471,0.020372933,0.009845112],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00047771854,0.0003018708,0.002081053,0.00019106007,0.00008562984,0.000015522495,0.034587666,0.000086026055,0.0003391252,0.006234271,0.9554704,0.00012968369],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003460531,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002454576,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93509746,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002579772,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015065468,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5231311},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404552231","doi":"10.1163/17087384-bja10101","title":"Defects of English Rules of Contractual Interpretation and Their Challenges for African Businesses","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"African Journal of Legal Studies","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Interpretation (philosophy); English law; Law; Political science; International law; Dispute resolution; Business; Law and economics; Sociology; Linguistics","score_opus":0.03877806472517567,"score_gpt":0.3209686850953129,"score_spread":0.2821906203701372,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404552231","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8843393,0.10332781,0.00040363742,0.002834799,0.0011103718,0.00017777884,0.000028403045,0.000019772466,0.007758172],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9889586,0.010410694,0.00010187529,0.0000074712916,0.0004808547,0.0000039407764,2.3832933e-7,0.0000062947925,0.000030009916],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99920017,0.00007437991,0.0003379613,0.00008527256,0.0001836949,0.00011850513],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973804,0.001103273,0.00028067685,0.000038283513,0.0011560353,0.000041349696],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007559515,0.00008524806,0.0003457061,0.00012802082,0.00010615539,0.00003607466,0.000087352455,0.000031920757,0.0000034616087],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014517441,0.000059718317,0.00011347325,0.00011685033,0.00038121804,0.00031171503,0.00002266374,0.000074937976,8.166707e-8],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00035687597,0.000107677406,0.000361384,0.00050601416,0.0009637677,0.000006287156,0.76368815,0.00000998049,0.0007952876,0.07381743,0.00046773982,0.15891942],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006633496,0.0015787057,0.0063547497,0.0011054665,0.000338229,0.0000076213573,0.54093647,0.000049699385,0.0017246532,0.008139491,0.4388801,0.00022146633],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000096246025,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003120605,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43841234,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000033511275,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011134729,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24352422},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404916787","doi":"10.59295/ssdoed2024.17","title":"The main problems of international succession law","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Ecological succession; Computer science","score_opus":0.01725977076970469,"score_gpt":0.32318112867823157,"score_spread":0.30592135790852687,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404916787","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009357448,0.00032497427,0.0003463208,0.018381786,0.0011377741,0.00007128319,0.0000018815948,0.000057949663,0.9703206],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9800255,0.00034714435,0.000027131822,0.000047445268,0.00016886221,0.0000032048658,8.2212205e-7,0.000001697808,0.01937819],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996124,0.000023449764,0.0000720342,0.00004926205,0.00018438206,0.000058474947],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998362,0.00007504539,0.000011879927,0.000035111487,0.000025867164,0.000015860309],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004393144,0.000018456765,0.000020773525,0.0000119703955,0.00018963272,0.00010209466,0.00010369415,0.000019823854,0.00039953206],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000011727614,0.000010669422,0.000024475905,0.00007023849,0.00010445482,0.000099998964,0.000017487497,0.000031991338,0.000015781901],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000013436534,0.000004428993,0.0001507156,0.0000026111254,0.00000529757,3.1519744e-7,0.0019895034,0.000001161443,0.0002938115,0.9775065,0.002138085,0.017906195],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018312698,0.0000057414723,0.00024560414,0.000021485987,0.0000015321197,1.5932042e-7,0.00055719144,0.00022638563,0.00015581571,0.008081129,0.9906704,0.000016256154],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004394836,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010300986,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9885323,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000019419977,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000033961565,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.66437066},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405000996","doi":"10.1515/9780776636429-018","title":"CHAPTER B-7 Liability of the Crown in Times of Pandemic","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of Ottawa Press eBooks","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Liability; Pandemic; Crown (dentistry); Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Political science; Law; Medicine; Materials science; Composite material; Internal medicine; Infectious disease (medical specialty)","score_opus":0.03156407138720232,"score_gpt":0.23507523944281006,"score_spread":0.20351116805560773,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405000996","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0027342136,0.00007337246,0.000007004436,0.00013267371,0.000086099506,0.00028801744,0.00006048834,0.000015944599,0.9966022],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7196822,0.000092671806,0.00003151173,0.000013214808,0.000032674612,8.545088e-8,0.0000014690479,0.000007859302,0.2801383],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991014,0.000055865363,0.00022513159,0.00019076669,0.0003263248,0.00010050699],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999091,0.00008082138,0.00040288782,0.00025003214,0.00012726273,0.000047940943],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00026517917,0.00011137748,0.0003287128,0.000059020476,0.00009101068,0.0000035586113,0.0004520491,0.00023761527,0.0004309767],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000023211347,0.000109435125,0.00021473735,0.0000105818735,0.0009588899,0.00004057909,0.00017414047,0.00021077188,0.0000012487984],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005699258,0.000015893525,0.001358229,0.000087918714,0.000050972903,0.0000023648063,0.01171254,0.0000037867676,0.00007845315,0.9822783,0.00021981285,0.0041347193],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029782264,0.00004323718,0.001427587,0.00018661507,0.00007651713,1.5605062e-7,0.00028418025,0.000008631468,0.00024271407,0.0042446195,0.99306613,0.000121805955],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009773524,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006202852,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9928463,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00004761152,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012858116,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9968205},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405534597","doi":"10.1017/9781108622288.002","title":"Note on Language","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Linguistics; Computer science; Programming language; Natural language processing; Philosophy","score_opus":0.014475483808996163,"score_gpt":0.34714202459673,"score_spread":0.33266654078773383,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405534597","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000002058344,0.00045118114,0.000016804945,0.0014807048,0.0010251804,0.00007996779,0.000008063655,0.00047797937,0.99645805],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00050694763,0.00014869534,0.000038200575,0.0003122022,0.0017111802,0.0000028387908,0.0000029152648,0.0001060249,0.997171],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999564,0.000016846308,0.00003657073,0.00011889123,0.0001698195,0.00009389646],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998456,0.000009773011,0.000016513324,0.00008911622,0.0000032692308,0.000035724937],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00008749936,0.000057876026,0.0000640552,0.0000779769,0.000028580964,0.000044062566,0.00006712692,0.00014869735,0.031133978],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000009824695,0.00004699061,0.000043436616,0.00006471167,0.00003497238,0.000006978423,0.0000099192775,0.00008470296,0.009670136],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[4.3330257e-7,0.000004247825,4.1692152e-7,0.0000061824267,0.000005535741,0.0000065083937,0.0026769016,5.3204556e-9,0.0000016013081,0.05941443,0.9242641,0.013619632],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018207535,0.000008203654,0.0000016686558,0.000059599726,0.000007427992,4.8665093e-8,0.00034230927,4.5856493e-7,0.0000028068323,0.00014643696,0.99934953,0.00006330812],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014114463,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021140734,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.075085424,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000025483492,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000031216372,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9967209},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405604044","doi":"10.1515/9782766303267-007","title":"CHAPITRE 4 Des précédents en droit de la famille canadien : le paradigme du choix en matière d’unions de fait et de contrats domestiques","year":2024,"lang":"fr","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.011350673589445052,"score_gpt":0.2826917495457145,"score_spread":0.2713410759562695,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405604044","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07018359,0.0010895423,0.0005872335,0.031616468,0.00036545657,0.00055789115,0.00018189581,0.00027815645,0.89513975],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.47723007,0.0035445872,0.0007564912,0.002283174,0.0010340246,0.000065977336,0.000038265418,0.00008488161,0.51496255],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99683,0.0005649325,0.0004829347,0.0005786724,0.0004454659,0.0010980259],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99793863,0.000920638,0.0001632629,0.0002715336,0.00011969801,0.0005862381],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001996185,0.00051039126,0.0005354311,0.000205028,0.0008948409,0.0004178487,0.00056953187,0.0011007184,0.0020345328],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014976975,0.00053980923,0.0003787811,0.00014222287,0.0010180017,0.0003621828,0.00015380055,0.00093346694,0.00019792962],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000094335255,0.000047534464,0.0030033085,0.0000828903,0.00028078663,0.00033444542,0.041464552,0.000020376412,0.000053876156,0.94911176,0.0019921314,0.003598895],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00031674918,0.00012603971,0.01691269,0.00048546802,0.0002587218,0.00017726466,0.0027264827,0.00044880217,0.00002669132,0.1916217,0.78631777,0.0005816331],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4509653,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3408878,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7843256,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020194135,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019882927,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997053},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405959154","doi":"10.1139/cjce-2024-0554","title":"Note of appreciation","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Engineering; Architectural engineering","score_opus":0.007066033378532572,"score_gpt":0.23892461826019318,"score_spread":0.2318585848816606,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405959154","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24687295,0.004835289,0.16768785,0.009269648,0.010120745,0.0003152612,0.000015813903,0.00004840476,0.56083405],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99939555,0.000031439708,0.00010032424,0.000022400209,0.00015556734,2.5279527e-7,1.7218912e-7,0.0000024619894,0.00029181177],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995995,0.000011512244,0.00016032394,0.000026826068,0.000091347785,0.00011047193],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99960214,0.000039110175,0.000067092406,0.000037054368,0.00012314043,0.00013148662],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003469811,0.00003057832,0.00008270796,0.00025478817,0.00006348366,0.000019290586,0.00009059886,0.000041148738,0.0000889468],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022030825,0.000033986533,0.000046278827,0.0002157274,0.000021217564,0.00009839228,0.00000194166,0.00007816652,5.52661e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038173013,0.000053116506,0.049130075,0.00032723384,0.00039758542,0.00009724627,0.08128793,0.12950552,0.008586322,0.53125995,0.025071455,0.17424539],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019472244,0.000022179753,0.019522004,0.00020970423,0.00002486865,0.0000019685785,0.0003373601,0.0010013949,0.00032782412,0.0005433088,0.9777423,0.00007233656],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0065199863,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.40211362,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9526709,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013412215,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00082457555,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9856313},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405994514","doi":"10.1139/cjes-2024-0161","title":"Note of appreciation","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Geology; Geochemistry","score_opus":0.021152089319580566,"score_gpt":0.3030239290583927,"score_spread":0.28187183973881214,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405994514","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6563235,0.0008997387,0.00097652164,0.008584206,0.0022027346,0.00008880664,0.0000041451653,0.0000045154975,0.33091587],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9983675,0.000044030974,0.00036225634,0.00012254599,0.000115459094,1.4836994e-7,7.55873e-8,7.0082046e-7,0.000987271],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99932593,0.000054408203,0.00019356624,0.00005182451,0.00021796681,0.00015629153],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993625,0.00006972258,0.000156735,0.0000373989,0.00020878114,0.00016486125],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013341241,0.000029604795,0.00008560663,0.0003306492,0.00043109214,0.00006767234,0.00022282416,0.00003563114,0.00015947693],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00032399385,0.00002639454,0.000049063285,0.0006088948,0.0004716574,0.00024266426,0.0000032937155,0.000060186376,0.000002058884],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015536814,0.000028059158,0.4247709,0.000020777927,0.00003647581,0.000015405669,0.030885695,0.00065503136,0.0008633982,0.39221948,0.0031406032,0.14734864],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015660212,0.0001058494,0.17008634,0.00010849797,0.000015404943,0.0000019823465,0.0025537927,0.000084958185,0.0006101026,0.005192841,0.82101774,0.00006587083],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024289064,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.42817003,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8178772,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000010758555,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038055298,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98220825},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405995312","doi":"10.1139/cjpp-2024-0379","title":"Note of appreciation","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Physiology and Pharmacology","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Chemistry","score_opus":0.01273913433178535,"score_gpt":0.3275042180371555,"score_spread":0.31476508370537015,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405995312","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97812307,0.00080093916,0.0001357899,0.00511706,0.0022494365,0.00006506354,0.000004777918,0.0000022664158,0.013501603],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998697,0.00022212729,0.000026159085,0.0005521047,0.00023749894,6.070868e-7,5.263017e-7,0.0000011092977,0.00026290404],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995165,0.00014510872,0.00014915809,0.00004456131,0.000027586822,0.00011710384],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995118,0.000108317,0.00011891349,0.000020989499,0.00012890334,0.00011111627],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00030463078,0.000032003158,0.000121666155,0.00015523992,0.00016580231,0.000003180495,0.00007898257,0.00008379345,0.00063154974],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000035144163,0.00003142106,0.000032581767,0.000106433334,0.00027797793,0.00005483263,0.000004158286,0.000108635395,8.4974545e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020182983,0.00005492544,0.012991684,0.00009608156,0.0002686418,0.000018043002,0.018025775,0.00013889733,0.8039524,0.08277204,0.028730538,0.052749168],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008467407,0.00016336024,0.042588778,0.000023703073,0.000117179035,0.000004246318,0.000467157,0.000042629224,0.03172486,0.0170972,0.90684175,0.00008239444],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037802712,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010898561,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87811124,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000037157402,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009210173,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6915027},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406154715","doi":"10.1139/cjb-2024-0143","title":"Note of appreciation","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Botany","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Biology; Botany","score_opus":0.012756183260286916,"score_gpt":0.3177263129734375,"score_spread":0.3049701297131506,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406154715","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2495161,0.00017352916,0.0028985331,0.002840343,0.000490233,0.000099689,0.0000016661127,0.000040673287,0.7439392],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9930761,0.000052867446,0.00012243143,0.00006633645,0.000065100015,0.0000018282745,1.2618415e-7,8.8316193e-7,0.006614327],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99972,0.000023518205,0.00006695222,0.00004392871,0.00009063573,0.000054992663],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998398,0.00003285613,0.000027022397,0.000049357463,0.000039123115,0.000011854493],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00019102209,0.000017387294,0.000039316797,0.000023752069,0.000087547,0.000008716101,0.000045684184,0.000032463584,0.00007051724],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006549465,0.00001805413,0.000022090338,0.0001437749,0.000032638534,0.000041178977,0.00000754173,0.000019907748,0.0000067850838],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020484693,0.0000643301,0.012439321,0.000011586588,0.000016031114,4.0644625e-7,0.0099604735,0.0000042207043,0.008322016,0.64430404,0.005419229,0.31943783],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009229243,0.000006694546,0.06804391,0.0000138309315,0.0000070190686,1.4319758e-8,0.0002970563,0.000052054005,0.00042110396,0.0035487404,0.9274905,0.000026833904],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007497677,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008468594,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9220712,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000025235839,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006063854,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11334295},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406160470","doi":"10.1139/cjz-2024-0181","title":"Note of appreciation","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Zoology","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Biology","score_opus":0.011675086781089567,"score_gpt":0.2898226097370941,"score_spread":0.27814752295600453,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406160470","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7657606,0.00079361774,0.00252274,0.015557558,0.0030191909,0.00007801575,0.0000047294375,0.000003986711,0.21225956],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99840033,0.00003764922,0.000103209204,0.00019616421,0.0001420067,1.9916018e-7,2.7083934e-7,0.0000011638014,0.0011190099],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995586,0.000071138704,0.00017198305,0.000030584943,0.000057550373,0.000110143395],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99947697,0.000060177354,0.00012579418,0.000038109232,0.00018593897,0.00011303972],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000419049,0.00002322472,0.000094057075,0.00021706684,0.00010759686,0.000008856614,0.0001051179,0.000070848364,0.00018756567],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00024571168,0.000023779792,0.000042741685,0.00015792369,0.00012386954,0.000056522276,0.0000022386835,0.00007525591,0.000002267855],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004402791,0.00002614476,0.32794583,0.00001949374,0.0000995274,0.000046578494,0.02594197,0.000089546105,0.0006257366,0.37170324,0.011809849,0.26164803],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002789223,0.00007675284,0.20226768,0.000035779776,0.00003308475,0.0000054413895,0.0010733268,0.000013470552,0.00016907758,0.009345309,0.78665316,0.000047965124],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0319287,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4568442,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.77484334,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010500494,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019178395,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97451776},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406172810","doi":"10.1139/as-2024-0075","title":"Note of appreciation","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Arctic Science","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology","score_opus":0.012953007715780925,"score_gpt":0.3543738806071637,"score_spread":0.34142087289138273,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406172810","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.41670722,0.000057738605,0.0050430773,0.0057264697,0.0012265664,0.00016678768,6.134821e-7,0.000046633988,0.5710249],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980765,0.000024343726,0.0004111351,0.00011983308,0.000031588974,0.000002015056,9.487738e-8,6.021714e-7,0.0013338961],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99935704,0.00002169664,0.00008535558,0.000106623884,0.00030473428,0.00012451963],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995885,0.000084260384,0.000040107454,0.000098202,0.00015863555,0.00003032393],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010255416,0.000022450642,0.000042395604,0.0001024972,0.00035970312,0.000030921186,0.00020345433,0.00001871501,0.00004841173],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006037245,0.000021885575,0.000017980998,0.0010119417,0.000593227,0.00020548701,0.000029556479,0.000028784634,0.000007677267],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005970407,0.000040908224,0.029431812,0.000011016191,0.0000026471896,1.8501899e-7,0.0131705245,0.000017873137,0.009461634,0.8006832,0.000153831,0.14702041],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037719708,0.000057773817,0.5461666,0.00013355125,0.000026245452,3.5019747e-7,0.0032604928,0.0013797835,0.013639667,0.0521243,0.38265187,0.00018217781],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022605895,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00042639973,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7485589,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007771428,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00039496616,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.341735},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406172913","doi":"10.1139/facets-2024-0314","title":"Note of appreciation","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"FACETS","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Business","score_opus":0.01173564825068896,"score_gpt":0.3478951955509687,"score_spread":0.33615954730027975,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406172913","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23432283,0.000096755204,0.0032833717,0.0038482454,0.00062503055,0.00012362124,0.0000028761933,0.000045472025,0.7576518],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9928729,0.000030519757,0.000085334585,0.000060357645,0.00004145282,0.0000017869846,0.0000010129128,7.5766985e-7,0.006905907],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997291,0.00002424756,0.00005978444,0.00004342001,0.000088225424,0.000055217286],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999855,0.000026323904,0.000025113648,0.00004503576,0.000036972728,0.000011591032],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00016414409,0.000017234366,0.000039031565,0.000029577835,0.0000835109,0.00000825762,0.000045574732,0.000034365225,0.000085842155],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005868727,0.000017765538,0.000018907143,0.0001242127,0.000028950884,0.000041994186,0.00000830879,0.00002152742,0.000011703024],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023096323,0.00009739874,0.024688913,0.00002908482,0.00002566291,3.3522463e-7,0.0350633,0.000045233126,0.007629879,0.45857018,0.014708826,0.4591181],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000094052164,0.000006439523,0.038345113,0.000012563437,0.0000049411674,9.0021155e-9,0.0002982187,0.000050481263,0.0017383964,0.0018885775,0.9575363,0.000024901185],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008002307,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006782322,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94282746,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002199766,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000054309396,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12097148},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406232664","doi":"10.1139/cgj-2024-0743","title":"Note of appreciation","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Geotechnical Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Geotechnical engineering; Geology; Forensic engineering; Engineering","score_opus":0.01191021813618962,"score_gpt":0.29572890892633047,"score_spread":0.2838186907901408,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406232664","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08405532,0.001147015,0.081407316,0.121475875,0.004572805,0.0006550505,0.000031948177,0.00015223584,0.70650244],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9977813,0.000118453645,0.00014311794,0.00042003026,0.00019989081,0.0000011111994,6.685668e-7,0.00000223458,0.0013332271],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993457,0.00005904737,0.00017839926,0.000060579445,0.00015869219,0.00019753797],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99944305,0.000047799815,0.00006218566,0.00007187661,0.00012910458,0.00024597193],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00065426773,0.000036155652,0.00008099813,0.0002054364,0.0003716131,0.00004328438,0.00016590455,0.00012699787,0.00023518903],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00029201846,0.000037442805,0.000063166925,0.00029585193,0.00010076238,0.00007878548,0.000007978189,0.00021592848,0.0000063689376],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022615479,0.000042654476,0.0030062268,0.000011234873,0.00004252904,0.000025237681,0.0025005534,0.00061962195,0.00057234935,0.3203353,0.033771686,0.63905],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000106699474,0.000013806538,0.007994509,0.0000332432,0.000011300048,0.0000025622342,0.00017010438,0.00021197615,0.000049876646,0.006173977,0.98518777,0.000044162814],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.079246365,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13386795,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9514161,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00032082596,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00151013,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.926885},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406237153","doi":"10.1139/er-2025-0003","title":"Note of appreciation","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Reviews","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Environmental science; Geography; Ecology; Environmental planning; Biology","score_opus":0.01458240015517653,"score_gpt":0.32746598362241086,"score_spread":0.3128835834672343,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406237153","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1200257,0.03224898,0.0049115317,0.0029873129,0.001060209,0.0014177649,0.00000693624,0.000046576984,0.837295],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9588388,0.030150563,0.00035502462,0.00022546848,0.00007517093,0.000017709332,0.0000058768114,0.0000025346956,0.01032883],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995212,0.00008320621,0.0001579865,0.000071743896,0.00010074236,0.000065100256],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998061,0.000023055165,0.00006985917,0.00008218124,4.1404513e-7,0.000018410637],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00039692424,0.00003455303,0.00009608827,0.000021848418,0.00009106868,0.000005300782,0.00006371166,0.000030438521,0.00021585626],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003874016,0.000032231146,0.00005694563,0.00006943979,0.00006787265,0.000056831996,0.000015245344,0.000030897296,0.00007944708],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000032327723,0.000053208583,0.006213067,0.000009380448,0.000003937422,8.980932e-8,0.0021599242,3.5239395e-7,0.003131839,0.0039228834,0.0018710736,0.982631],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000050797917,0.0000061848455,0.014146923,0.00002588501,0.000008984081,1.7747013e-8,0.00009593998,0.000004562262,0.00035968318,0.00023531288,0.98503935,0.000026346144],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000094290524,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0000656822,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9831683,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007127421,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000011310596,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23634747},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406414140","doi":"10.1139/gen-2024-0172","title":"Note of appreciation","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Genome","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Biology; Evolutionary biology; Genetics; Computational biology","score_opus":0.012354807282856846,"score_gpt":0.3082531812014131,"score_spread":0.2958983739185562,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406414140","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19429193,0.00023149801,0.0041887537,0.0026524165,0.0004604229,0.00012387977,0.000003320118,0.00003823052,0.7980095],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99340504,0.00005810333,0.00012617793,0.000068669804,0.00008110296,0.0000018731489,0.0000014269766,8.6077586e-7,0.0062567475],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997438,0.000019497933,0.000062299776,0.00004342102,0.00007363473,0.000057302455],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998629,0.000019399617,0.000024528883,0.000047935075,0.000033567405,0.000011643008],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001864438,0.000016197826,0.000037892485,0.000035872683,0.00008650894,0.000007656733,0.000050171075,0.000027880827,0.000103422186],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000026532509,0.000017174723,0.000019774909,0.00014265253,0.00002978564,0.000032322278,0.000009111516,0.000018374449,0.000011875549],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029041392,0.00009425741,0.007701809,0.000038597133,0.000037600556,6.373265e-7,0.05221516,0.000071810726,0.042282876,0.67004263,0.0006318858,0.22685371],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000585457,0.000005701582,0.04779452,0.0000036258841,0.000004745016,9.232123e-9,0.00024595228,0.000007352375,0.00017650549,0.0024965552,0.94918567,0.000020822172],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005811222,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00035736934,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9485538,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000028895409,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005732705,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11324004},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406618900","doi":"10.1139/cjps-2024-0229","title":"Note of appreciation","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Plant Science","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Biology","score_opus":0.012508653671556381,"score_gpt":0.28708830353993775,"score_spread":0.27457964986838135,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406618900","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7577448,0.00043886522,0.003368832,0.00795972,0.0046562045,0.0001671059,0.00006420268,0.000007898848,0.22559237],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992556,0.00002729528,0.00016354391,0.000089788344,0.00007775258,1.415353e-7,2.543985e-7,6.8002566e-7,0.0003849193],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99932706,0.00002590327,0.00017129592,0.00005282742,0.00025826704,0.00016466304],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99926835,0.000051419895,0.0001416847,0.000050815437,0.00026228293,0.0002254184],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014494152,0.000026789867,0.00007349619,0.00040891106,0.0003809643,0.00005333814,0.00029970027,0.000027876966,0.000045440633],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00043068622,0.000025011605,0.000029298933,0.00065259554,0.00044347666,0.00025562465,0.0000045838324,0.000067631554,0.0000015018342],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042145868,0.00004202979,0.10226367,0.000032640684,0.000030301106,0.000069881964,0.06281236,0.0003781288,0.017720489,0.6460843,0.016780015,0.15374403],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020822344,0.00005684851,0.08304289,0.00016890475,0.000018822935,0.000009422105,0.0019901828,0.00019331776,0.0023440118,0.0031276976,0.908752,0.00008764438],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024460606,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14238204,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.891972,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018319352,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006116979,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99951744},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406619086","doi":"10.1139/bcb-2024-0284","title":"Note of appreciation","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biochemistry and Cell Biology","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Chemistry; Biology; Psychology","score_opus":0.00758998031046336,"score_gpt":0.2822330150651093,"score_spread":0.2746430347546459,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406619086","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.66748303,0.00056261785,0.00017216963,0.0004984117,0.00011808688,0.000030503541,0.0000034060986,0.000010908559,0.33112085],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9956034,0.00027108315,0.000043097894,0.000041957148,0.000057132183,0.000001573297,0.000006027165,5.3324624e-7,0.0039751898],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997661,0.000018871739,0.00006321094,0.00007353933,0.000019270394,0.000059013182],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999855,0.000033639313,0.00003067666,0.00004194226,0.000023462677,0.000015289914],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00011325726,0.000024865769,0.000047827136,0.0000110654855,0.00007326896,0.0000036063948,0.00003762129,0.000104342726,0.000035782],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000026839096,0.000024342666,0.000014986536,0.00005589408,0.000114823364,0.0000088247225,0.000013184905,0.000025406978,7.5002697e-7],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019677183,0.00003696574,0.0066461023,0.000045608853,0.000006807712,1.101016e-7,0.00090751034,2.8180517e-7,0.8919792,0.017417183,0.00045151732,0.082489],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013815031,0.000013757847,0.00094153854,0.000007512957,0.000008297291,4.7800647e-8,0.00033152348,0.000011390234,0.4765991,0.0010447626,0.520862,0.00004195009],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00017363788,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000016392441,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5204104,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000008468061,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000047509766,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09926651},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406633508","doi":"10.1139/cjm-2024-0228","title":"Note of appreciation","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Microbiology","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Biology; Chemistry","score_opus":0.009787924830809935,"score_gpt":0.2733444852018722,"score_spread":0.2635565603710623,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406633508","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.88716346,0.0018826631,0.0017323337,0.013824977,0.0039011068,0.00013123461,0.000031067797,0.000005430936,0.09132773],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99859595,0.00004689956,0.00011481846,0.00021647876,0.00011268929,1.5548224e-7,0.0000013485892,0.0000012749989,0.0009103987],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99955773,0.000081400336,0.00018669045,0.000035996538,0.000018602184,0.000119570715],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99950415,0.00004987275,0.00013766326,0.00003862171,0.00018634375,0.00008334281],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00041956818,0.000027795511,0.00010340431,0.00020408502,0.000108451975,0.000007896611,0.00012085475,0.00008710633,0.0001575639],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014206191,0.000027268512,0.000050444818,0.00013668856,0.00015108484,0.000038471222,0.000002933087,0.00007627359,0.000002800763],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010469774,0.00006493181,0.08274878,0.000051012445,0.00028525447,0.00004748594,0.04738237,0.00009786744,0.27373603,0.231645,0.1063391,0.25749746],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014571873,0.000031527557,0.004030524,0.000025875499,0.000013125864,0.0000055999403,0.00037343183,8.075019e-7,0.0014157925,0.0007317313,0.99319845,0.00002738851],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016943567,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.23157525,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88685936,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000116699026,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001797987,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9896027},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406653293","doi":"10.1016/b978-0-7020-3428-2.00031-0","title":"10.1016/b978-0-7020-3428-2.00031-0","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Time to knit","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; History","score_opus":0.01300498420364538,"score_gpt":0.21598146124282808,"score_spread":0.2029764770391827,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406653293","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[7.1971226e-7,0.00024573528,4.3372106e-7,0.0008742166,0.000014452156,0.00041447062,0.000057432888,0.00026577854,0.99812675],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0000030919073,0.00000788463,0.000019813187,0.00008185711,0.0014984757,0.000013611098,0.00004859797,0.00006560797,0.99826103],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998141,0.000040889852,0.0003182306,0.0004440039,0.000638576,0.00041730725],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989855,0.000073600575,0.00012558053,0.00037138537,0.000117280564,0.00032662234],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00035061222,0.00031013836,0.00038161816,0.00018489714,0.00044665835,0.00014341879,0.0004185761,0.00048464542,0.99884003],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000027915532,0.00034066735,0.00022305666,0.00007483834,0.00019068072,0.00012036876,0.000073143274,0.00032243947,0.9936341],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037833277,0.000014288967,9.754779e-9,0.00000469409,0.0000377769,0.000010313615,0.00026857844,0.0000016737488,9.589469e-7,0.0020300602,0.20509402,0.7924998],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011559239,0.000103412305,0.0000014356765,0.00007796025,0.000063513515,0.0000017461201,0.0000028352717,0.0000027052386,0.0000011954264,0.00072298315,0.998493,0.00041360973],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005847816,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000030351275,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.793399,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017310142,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002106279,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999045},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406695657","doi":"10.1139/cjss-2024-0111","title":"Note of appreciation","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Soil Science","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Environmental science","score_opus":0.012846437921240125,"score_gpt":0.2937677790153111,"score_spread":0.28092134109407096,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406695657","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.73000383,0.00029362354,0.001198872,0.006353261,0.0020143513,0.00006511599,0.000002779272,0.000004148699,0.26006404],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990015,0.00002933208,0.00012797266,0.00011497125,0.00009407895,1.8433953e-7,4.965906e-8,9.0502016e-7,0.0006309884],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992572,0.000027302498,0.00018434947,0.000058342943,0.00028892947,0.00018385107],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990247,0.000037947815,0.00014854352,0.00006213795,0.0004637387,0.00026294892],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016389161,0.000028753127,0.00007626243,0.00038349963,0.0004504087,0.00006517537,0.00033357096,0.00003179566,0.000053873395],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00054274226,0.000027661055,0.000038225484,0.00094531087,0.0006927495,0.00033176746,0.0000060516204,0.000072787734,0.0000018597312],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001758113,0.000033532837,0.162246,0.000022603625,0.00001991111,0.000019782494,0.050835468,0.0006301793,0.0045521804,0.3373346,0.005079045,0.4392091],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00036145336,0.00009134079,0.37032434,0.00022003223,0.000029654804,0.000004935075,0.00406227,0.00031682313,0.0038170905,0.009984805,0.6106432,0.0001440394],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07576995,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.33593637,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6055642,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026531232,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007940672,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9976834},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406919552","doi":"10.1080/01440365.2025.2456268","title":"Jurisdiction over <i>Infangthief</i> in England: The Case of John Milksop","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Legal History","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Vancouver Island University","funders":"British Academy","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.01138246775021285,"score_gpt":0.27994912713641446,"score_spread":0.2685666593862016,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406919552","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8747801,0.008268927,0.0000966942,0.004874773,0.0023222296,0.00013348514,0.0000018961227,0.000009782796,0.10951208],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99445945,0.0007443216,0.000011350341,0.0004437622,0.00035333447,0.0000010053118,1.1286416e-7,0.0000039975193,0.003982644],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99876493,0.00043742493,0.0003757205,0.000050974002,0.0002434248,0.00012751468],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990655,0.00031407372,0.00031290122,0.000140341,0.00013182925,0.000035363773],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028783185,0.00006415499,0.00015100968,0.00015709826,0.00023919568,0.000010721746,0.00024042594,0.00006454997,0.00012238209],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00011106644,0.000039254715,0.00010462904,0.00022351339,0.00032707682,0.00021352986,0.0000229597,0.00036726057,0.0000015397228],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001969267,0.0006251844,0.0054931715,0.00009330326,0.00029761918,0.0009698341,0.49984342,0.00045581124,0.004662207,0.12696081,0.2573222,0.101307176],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00045223522,0.000051376064,0.0024657324,0.00004336912,0.000059171132,0.000085564236,0.0019772332,0.00002852724,0.000049230253,0.0003113242,0.99443567,0.00004058805],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012169613,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012822389,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7371135,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00039372558,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00047467573,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9944084},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406927454","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.5046382","title":"Both Sides Now: Common Law Relationships as Status in Canada","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Geography","score_opus":0.011587484145910721,"score_gpt":0.27961623770035055,"score_spread":0.26802875355443984,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406927454","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7321527,0.0035279724,0.00014420837,0.009847383,0.0005050257,0.00014991581,0.0000026630435,0.00002175668,0.2536484],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9898104,0.004596986,0.000007939191,0.00028705204,0.00010032242,0.0000027445012,0.0000017414905,0.00000491873,0.0051878924],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977529,0.0002690715,0.00023023724,0.000103772465,0.000278689,0.0013653191],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995562,0.00015559113,0.000078258934,0.00007983859,0.00004580205,0.000084304294],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016415628,0.000071323135,0.00011450337,0.000066950015,0.0007739761,0.00007380839,0.00015368234,0.000056461748,0.000037570277],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007488846,0.00007296544,0.000037304162,0.00025712937,0.000057429257,0.00017900219,0.000015880098,0.0013920915,0.0000056274816],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016045602,0.000014212537,0.06506821,0.0000011661313,0.00002129774,0.0000034787797,0.0006570405,0.00004092934,0.00000566909,0.92718023,0.00034859026,0.0066431467],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00044437012,0.000045845507,0.024075115,0.000033062708,0.00001787254,0.000009261594,0.019698257,0.000036409292,0.000014441162,0.44645518,0.50904137,0.00012883026],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98880094,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999215,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5086928,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0057933507,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.021495806,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9980232},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407398196","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.5135615","title":"Advance Requests for Medical Assistance in Dying in the International Context: Some Legal Issues for the Canadian Case","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Agencia Estatal de Investigación; European Social Fund; Universidad de Granada; Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Legal case; Business; Public relations; Political science; Law; Geography","score_opus":0.02000914929675053,"score_gpt":0.3648590491087031,"score_spread":0.3448498998119526,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407398196","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.068274476,0.0630269,0.0130418595,0.8312041,0.0099179,0.0046971054,0.00020957428,0.000056580826,0.0095714675],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.984548,0.009141932,0.000056237233,0.0014039834,0.0018179124,0.00024531953,0.000011321643,0.000010571943,0.002764763],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971372,0.00022010902,0.00042796714,0.00025893538,0.00057720253,0.0013786098],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986659,0.0006990905,0.00020467798,0.00016399732,0.0001882141,0.00007807955],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010181279,0.00015022267,0.00021198743,0.00019148877,0.0009812762,0.00042789144,0.0010733653,0.00026515353,0.00001994604],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010531431,0.00010887815,0.00015105668,0.00013629426,0.00013921215,0.00022029794,0.000056131656,0.00279609,5.296651e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006983305,0.000027309088,0.00056566537,0.000012613684,0.00006944904,0.0000768319,0.0055922335,0.000083641746,4.7102577e-7,0.93302596,0.00050070917,0.059975296],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007426914,0.000049072085,0.00018772407,0.00025087304,0.000028473793,0.0002059057,0.013049163,0.0016979753,0.0000012766487,0.27804694,0.70556915,0.00017076914],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.46411845,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99763435,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9162735,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004177135,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.021183489,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99964565},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W440754315","doi":"","title":"LibGuides@Southampton: Law: Canadian Law","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"libguides","venue":"","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.028207986712467065,"score_gpt":0.2869046556559629,"score_spread":0.25869666894349586,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W440754315","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00006185101,0.0007027163,0.000006442461,0.012419716,0.0038956406,0.0005121831,0.0001287057,0.00031237467,0.98196036],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.032775097,0.00095350813,0.0002314208,0.01851342,0.007089072,0.000071450304,0.00028162205,0.00008750257,0.9399969],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99736154,0.0001456738,0.00041596818,0.00048169165,0.0006771101,0.00091802067],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980866,0.00011188186,0.00014752599,0.0004505061,0.00028777393,0.0009157337],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005837587,0.00032380247,0.0004112204,0.00017114004,0.0014790411,0.0007023705,0.0006701907,0.00096774416,0.026279842],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005817989,0.00031165086,0.00022820111,0.00021310923,0.0006070665,0.00036217284,0.00006377243,0.00047683474,0.0023072374],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[5.580051e-7,0.0000053452886,0.000012965863,0.000008166793,0.000022135766,0.0000064715628,0.0016740492,1.4114482e-7,5.35835e-7,0.5094885,0.48692635,0.0018547417],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000085929794,0.000022679618,0.000025949177,0.000059239417,0.00003382424,0.0000012331261,0.00093926536,0.0000031632894,0.000006170007,0.004205735,0.99420345,0.00041337265],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9979548,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9969383,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5072771,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004691705,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015508166,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99993354},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407729879","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198939108.001.0001","title":"Comparative Succession Law","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Ecological succession; Political science; Biology; Botany","score_opus":0.038966546846896606,"score_gpt":0.36373519670414894,"score_spread":0.32476864985725235,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407729879","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000004214291,0.00021897638,0.000062276,0.0010507319,0.0006498387,0.00019765834,0.00000835066,0.00012213408,0.9976858],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0018659083,0.00016495537,0.000037573096,0.000533466,0.0004995557,0.000005667049,0.000035054076,0.000003896897,0.99685395],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99919355,0.000058777732,0.0001364089,0.00017946768,0.000290868,0.00014091977],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99954,0.000108505024,0.000070687325,0.000115382456,0.000103401624,0.000062034356],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00019357141,0.00010505113,0.00022436834,0.000051543982,0.00052154245,0.000083243285,0.00017357788,0.00026560272,0.0028061382],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000055893543,0.000093259376,0.00008387516,0.000056967277,0.00022514594,0.0000886925,0.000044213662,0.00017987248,0.00016972703],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000025239276,0.0000060328107,0.0000020224818,0.000005586626,0.000010658992,7.117694e-7,0.0017772348,1.1544104e-7,5.049987e-7,0.73373574,0.26332134,0.0011375293],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000055337678,0.000010510403,0.0000098874025,0.0000949107,0.0000188766,3.555807e-8,0.00023321896,0.0000022019253,0.000008769227,0.016417775,0.98304296,0.00010553897],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0044998615,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023204591,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7197216,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018305755,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00070011785,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9981054},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407746191","doi":"10.5771/9780739146576-161","title":"Chapter 07. Deconstructing the Backlash: Same-Sex Marriage Litigation and Social Change in the United States and Canada","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Lexington Books","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Backlash; Political science; Gender studies; Demography; Sociology; Engineering; Mechanical engineering","score_opus":0.03383495484500468,"score_gpt":0.266002593717724,"score_spread":0.23216763887271932,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407746191","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4738865,0.0002880597,0.0000044083263,0.018036555,0.0007354707,0.00106872,0.00009068111,0.00005946216,0.50583017],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8831603,0.0013624453,0.00007258113,0.009671669,0.0035233125,0.00006712053,0.0001566437,0.00009273162,0.101893194],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987685,0.00008074802,0.00024843373,0.00026102393,0.0003747236,0.00026654915],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992302,0.0002914871,0.00022045684,0.00013877929,0.00006035321,0.00005868958],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000741076,0.00020766955,0.00020239968,0.000090656715,0.0011200794,0.00023379333,0.00018416789,0.00027715025,0.0002059046],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000023111526,0.00015323763,0.000039860406,0.000023980483,0.00062101264,0.00010328938,0.00006384378,0.0006356847,0.0000020554055],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016917078,0.0000039415295,0.001810594,0.00003943667,0.000039398714,0.000015692865,0.15892191,1.5982961e-7,0.000023426692,0.7773441,0.00019592875,0.06158849],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019266248,0.00001942868,0.0020067464,0.00007182352,0.000032787477,0.0000059825334,0.005229537,0.00003023897,0.000011080359,0.017272532,0.9748778,0.00024939555],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7628656,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.94810027,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97468185,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008559599,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001427262,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.86148584},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407872525","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.5135237","title":"Formal Causation in the Law","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Merck Canada Inc. (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Causation; Philosophy; Law; Political science; Epistemology","score_opus":0.009164324274295232,"score_gpt":0.30048192473640195,"score_spread":0.2913176004621067,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407872525","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4002853,0.0017033698,0.0040312624,0.050219204,0.00060073717,0.00025219444,4.2507656e-7,0.000031569525,0.54287595],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9957373,0.0013690684,0.000004321961,0.00054195913,0.00021447534,0.0000032674282,4.950149e-7,0.0000016277544,0.0021274537],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99861723,0.0001433694,0.00011875617,0.000051737185,0.00018628655,0.00088261394],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99981976,0.000044558976,0.000039136157,0.00005072871,0.000031629534,0.000014183454],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036375953,0.0000369731,0.000046022305,0.00005443354,0.00065593026,0.000084604275,0.00016862807,0.000042274754,0.000018282126],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000031055668,0.00002709326,0.00003889349,0.00022757145,0.000053783893,0.00025950721,0.000008145583,0.000679581,0.0000055625173],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007270889,0.0000146162565,0.0006986915,4.314013e-7,0.0000069222347,4.2659676e-7,0.0033072429,0.0000031848253,0.00000831964,0.9731708,0.000058865062,0.022723224],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033279258,0.000056585664,0.004617341,0.000011102165,0.000012360677,0.000011408658,0.024461817,0.000023361345,0.000007913702,0.5201806,0.4502301,0.000054622098],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035762605,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13668676,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.595452,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00048899255,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011664357,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.87906647},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407872549","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.5134828","title":"The next step in the unification of private international law in Europe: should it be codification?","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institute on Governance","funders":"","keywords":"Unification; Conflict of laws; Law; Political science; Computer science; Programming language","score_opus":0.055059404064902485,"score_gpt":0.35205072775695617,"score_spread":0.29699132369205367,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407872549","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17610641,0.006552862,0.0041864556,0.5203036,0.003591338,0.0022812192,0.000044873246,0.00006192027,0.28687134],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9580304,0.03866893,0.000020790523,0.0004194588,0.00029788382,0.000030073334,0.000018903727,0.0000073936235,0.0025061534],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99701256,0.0007682414,0.00059730164,0.0002120847,0.0006683338,0.000741476],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99859285,0.000296718,0.00046956536,0.00030037377,0.00031495345,0.000025515088],"candidate_categories":["research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008258865,0.00012778354,0.0001574253,0.00015248776,0.0004402569,0.0002780009,0.0014445405,0.00016355196,0.000016745034],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00029258046,0.000090066256,0.00008779523,0.00048456117,0.00022399978,0.00015842194,0.0001261324,0.002731142,0.000002400707],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034528228,0.00006667982,0.0010667111,0.0000048868305,0.000041358508,5.863991e-7,0.0046922155,0.00013074643,0.000027122564,0.9805816,0.0001296729,0.013223886],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004823419,0.000051994437,0.011971808,0.00015280419,0.000039607923,0.000007024256,0.017874409,0.00050462794,0.00001586914,0.1796912,0.7890216,0.0001867218],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0041012396,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09918882,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8008904,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00091336726,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031065934,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995696},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407932841","doi":"10.21991/cf29485","title":"What is Most Bothersome About Section 33: Or What Hasn’t Yet Been Said","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Thompson Rivers University","funders":"","keywords":"Section (typography); History; Political science; Business; Advertising","score_opus":0.021247723575024358,"score_gpt":0.3104137479691132,"score_spread":0.28916602439408884,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407932841","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.028762417,0.025168465,0.121116616,0.23480278,0.092848875,0.005268735,0.0009833918,0.0021665166,0.4888822],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9516005,0.009971258,0.00035996982,0.012661891,0.00084245624,0.00020321118,0.00018487268,0.000021196673,0.024154635],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99627256,0.00016831729,0.0007632142,0.0008263934,0.0008819597,0.0010875546],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99804246,0.00032200123,0.00026273655,0.00048509124,0.0005951311,0.00029258445],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007831452,0.0004493499,0.00048000112,0.0005051196,0.004780814,0.0017069756,0.0005323632,0.0005409656,0.001992074],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00035349638,0.0004379574,0.00032179448,0.0012625876,0.0067308014,0.0062043373,0.00018618343,0.00045160548,0.00031799581],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017428635,0.00015322979,0.0033059518,0.00002810006,0.0001581705,0.00001736798,0.0010337235,0.00012539876,0.00013497846,0.9451569,0.03007628,0.019635623],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014646454,0.00006531993,0.0005133334,0.0009343874,0.00010834106,0.000042237858,0.0215427,0.0002239802,0.0002480846,0.018235214,0.9560903,0.00053147663],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013630379,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005019564,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92692167,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00090343284,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0046405457,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99980724},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407997480","doi":"10.3366/ircl.2025.0595","title":"Note from the Senior Editor","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Research in Children s Literature","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.022415664406430176,"score_gpt":0.4215819235893415,"score_spread":0.3991662591829113,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407997480","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.38463557,0.0028480256,0.00012288608,0.3371134,0.01498744,0.0010686506,0.00048278872,0.00010207735,0.25863916],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97810507,0.00042514224,0.000084448606,0.0007587096,0.013020844,0.000033393582,0.00010544174,0.0000051652073,0.007461795],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980156,0.00036145406,0.00015126946,0.00023056465,0.0009844406,0.00025671124],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99848443,0.0008612051,0.00002391375,0.00018103246,0.00039940263,0.000049986877],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015733631,0.000065204316,0.00006668724,0.00020391932,0.00039648009,0.0006179979,0.00073439215,0.00014191975,0.00022652514],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000745476,0.000047832145,0.000053310723,0.00074002176,0.00020359007,0.00023232582,0.00013629845,0.0007587128,0.00003953786],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000109152315,0.00016433478,0.3688873,0.0000030020665,0.0001135137,0.000014381003,0.021781899,0.00000816071,0.00019029992,0.19201203,0.35971412,0.05700178],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020157309,0.0000053273106,0.2023172,0.00014481609,0.0000014546831,3.0975994e-7,0.00019004452,0.000036104175,0.000027740307,0.011244508,0.78578955,0.000041371153],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0059697307,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018384878,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5934695,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020838597,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00025518195,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9024487},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408071029","doi":"10.1139/cjp-2024-0292","title":"Note of appreciation","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Physics","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Physics; Theoretical physics","score_opus":0.01386339074964357,"score_gpt":0.28924537081569934,"score_spread":0.2753819800660558,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408071029","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.49299243,0.00088753836,0.030448483,0.011696633,0.0048507014,0.00022440705,0.000025348438,0.000011683102,0.45886278],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99889714,0.000020776435,0.000096304386,0.000085978485,0.00032339356,1.432107e-7,3.5382945e-7,0.0000015113626,0.0005743871],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996318,0.000030425199,0.00012930114,0.000025553021,0.000097038,0.00008583215],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994868,0.000031425603,0.000121896446,0.000039106973,0.00021542246,0.00010534189],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00023787963,0.00002421555,0.00007431352,0.00006860646,0.00011934991,0.000018483595,0.000091983966,0.0000309947,0.000033293327],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000736922,0.000025353398,0.000053135765,0.00020771744,0.00006601142,0.00010551277,0.0000017910484,0.00006464598,0.0000013749258],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000911995,0.000021929705,0.014163995,0.0000170805,0.000048316408,0.000005371893,0.021927588,0.00019859975,0.00060536875,0.52602047,0.008382424,0.42859975],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002594715,0.000042197404,0.017500553,0.000102461105,0.000043797856,4.6962433e-7,0.001223408,0.000053098734,0.0015721673,0.03270411,0.94642854,0.00006971593],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017297689,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06995933,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9380461,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00011034904,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017844365,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9892462},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408616048","doi":"10.5040/9781509970988","title":"Promise of Legality","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Hart Publishing eBooks","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Principle of legality; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.03207437519503229,"score_gpt":0.2990559866967297,"score_spread":0.2669816115016974,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408616048","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000060544644,0.00013207067,0.000024779749,0.0014575687,0.0010381531,0.00040930128,0.000065699285,0.00016567558,0.9966462],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.002588191,0.000015102333,0.00006885735,0.00024094518,0.00088427274,0.000020966667,0.00005394805,0.000016419255,0.9961113],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981556,0.0001386078,0.00039836514,0.00032207623,0.0007015226,0.00028383735],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985961,0.00015363935,0.00033812592,0.00037652746,0.00041144664,0.00012418455],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017050985,0.00017033948,0.00036258812,0.00019625157,0.00035542823,0.0010277494,0.0005856405,0.00056533486,0.00032151712],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005529619,0.00018088735,0.00021261616,0.00005957242,0.00030929092,0.0006109699,0.0001415922,0.00054505264,0.000009858324],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010754752,0.000014662052,0.000022135271,0.00011931387,0.000043298533,0.0000027743847,0.004502635,9.8578575e-8,0.000012295916,0.45343128,0.5135257,0.028315023],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014084199,0.00001333717,0.00005488912,0.0002983175,0.00004716667,1.8346583e-7,0.00009911482,0.0000011825051,0.000036361296,0.011105643,0.9880482,0.00015476535],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030727433,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002383595,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47452244,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026427585,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003358405,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99106115},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409148924","doi":"10.1093/jnlids/idaf017","title":"<i>Deripaska v Montenegro</i>: the alpha and omega of State succession to BITs","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International Dispute Settlement","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Montenegro; Omega; Ecological succession; Alpha (finance); State (computer science); Mathematics; Philosophy; History; Biology; Ethnology; Botany; Statistics; Linguistics; Algorithm","score_opus":0.009722941722857389,"score_gpt":0.3239730956249972,"score_spread":0.31425015390213984,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409148924","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.864077,0.0005867251,0.0045419764,0.10966933,0.002591467,0.0002437399,0.00006145029,0.000007948972,0.0182204],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99532366,0.0008860759,0.00025024996,0.00096093863,0.00017695736,0.0000026809232,0.00000196347,0.0000030039118,0.002394454],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988568,0.000062025945,0.00038252625,0.00007427835,0.000522855,0.00010155203],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991421,0.000088247805,0.00024952085,0.000060226732,0.0003953946,0.00006451866],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007781877,0.000058867743,0.00010997735,0.00014965383,0.00013567334,0.00006928669,0.00027178848,0.000020524958,0.00006163318],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009962924,0.00003924033,0.000066464796,0.00015878669,0.00006247037,0.00016852992,0.00007897612,0.000083491024,0.0000011837269],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010263072,0.0007825297,0.12184582,0.00007865927,0.001268144,0.00003548089,0.047975224,0.0009508676,0.01984636,0.1647565,0.14121006,0.50022405],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00044419072,0.000096779884,0.12950796,0.00017273326,0.000024703288,0.0000020098362,0.0016301498,0.00007953928,0.0012216257,0.0012217268,0.8655433,0.000055300898],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003197426,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00054061087,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7243332,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000083881576,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010678916,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16001743},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409443593","doi":"10.5539/jpl.v18n2p47","title":"The Expansion of China’s Exclusive Jurisdiction in International Civil Procedure: Legal Transplant or False Analogies?","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Politics and Law","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Office for Philosophy and Social Sciences; China Scholarship Council","keywords":"Jurisdiction; China; Political science; Law; Civil procedure; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.012586918219278645,"score_gpt":0.30773541178842195,"score_spread":0.2951484935691433,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409443593","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91367614,0.0006711704,0.00044667584,0.01865075,0.0013165786,0.00014506206,0.000015005427,0.000007815309,0.0650708],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99670666,0.0021105963,0.000025611509,0.00014910658,0.00017446271,0.0000010271478,6.4443645e-7,0.0000022041306,0.0008297057],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991814,0.00006131268,0.00033294127,0.000056657213,0.0002383821,0.0001293233],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99951464,0.00011003934,0.00017469142,0.000043051845,0.000112190806,0.000045398378],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000495093,0.000052283867,0.00012087954,0.00009477007,0.00025159487,0.00006507297,0.00012802184,0.000056069523,0.000014007413],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007434062,0.00003326103,0.00005320397,0.00011561129,0.00018951611,0.00017130963,0.000016657144,0.00014014044,8.469986e-8],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013968628,0.00005443898,0.0014210629,0.000017782773,0.000038191683,0.000013668452,0.0064072893,0.000020079067,0.00028440703,0.9887175,0.00022613029,0.002659778],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002231833,0.0005012488,0.14184888,0.00076150754,0.00012931475,0.00006425523,0.013500476,0.00055058306,0.0014705076,0.061009694,0.7777255,0.00020619185],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018035559,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006830596,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9277078,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000052983884,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00028267823,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3811633},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409691613","doi":"10.63485/64d27-7t570","title":"The access principle","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Business","score_opus":0.06370695146254446,"score_gpt":0.4337911804431264,"score_spread":0.37008422898058196,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409691613","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016643839,0.0003188905,0.00036333743,0.025530977,0.0016296825,0.00034095583,0.0000025510158,0.00017762063,0.9549922],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8141677,0.0053429725,0.00020848987,0.000658894,0.004637384,0.0000853921,0.000007257566,0.000016358383,0.1748756],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99905825,0.00008127364,0.00014257529,0.00017529503,0.00033029995,0.000212338],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993908,0.0000961689,0.000086171356,0.00027764804,0.000081022416,0.0000682189],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007448804,0.00007806373,0.00008191309,0.000020062587,0.0009925452,0.0007332094,0.000760036,0.0001661579,0.00076759903],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000069477974,0.000051792496,0.00008443198,0.00006101835,0.0001501951,0.00009196834,0.0006194563,0.0002628987,0.00006821037],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010324399,0.000042408486,0.0025423304,0.000010447804,0.00004842444,0.0000013370147,0.007408499,0.000087978624,0.0000023226276,0.5886229,0.021594293,0.3796287],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026306017,0.0000020556747,0.004175032,0.000007259074,0.000006540932,5.7375235e-8,0.00018372617,0.00006181301,0.000010086454,0.0050512194,0.99039775,0.00007814872],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005905425,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0291068,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96880347,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009879141,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00031713565,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9886095},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409826429","doi":"10.12927/hcpol.2025.27478","title":"Advance Requests for Medical Assistance in Dying in the International Context: Some Legal Issues for the Canadian Case","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Healthcare policy","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Political science; Law; Psychology; History","score_opus":0.0414000788324212,"score_gpt":0.45370887413456157,"score_spread":0.4123087953021404,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409826429","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019300984,0.0024720393,0.000112702146,0.9730532,0.00072433456,0.0009322717,0.000054943463,0.000015713083,0.0033337902],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9745527,0.00039143732,0.000046696467,0.0229074,0.00091132504,0.00030629538,0.000005510898,0.000004601472,0.00087404344],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988823,0.00013886287,0.00022967836,0.00015168876,0.00024830826,0.00034917332],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989735,0.0006637243,0.00004727988,0.000120740726,0.00011000607,0.00008476083],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018879722,0.00006240419,0.000100365214,0.00015412178,0.00072291,0.00012030135,0.00032604334,0.000100548255,0.000009275679],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013477979,0.000046221823,0.000038344457,0.0002751848,0.00011600499,0.00015148523,0.000013970293,0.00018411542,7.523612e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002192968,0.0000100188045,0.002216831,0.000022985238,0.000003642813,0.000031461816,0.010800607,0.0000016722861,3.1838812e-7,0.9160176,0.0016241025,0.06924882],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00033311543,0.000016839724,0.0034787352,0.00009945171,0.0000018137915,0.000008876018,0.005574516,0.0005118303,0.00000157692,0.012580509,0.9773424,0.000050336195],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96160674,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9986851,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9757183,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00080706086,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033543564,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5950484},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410086246","doi":"10.1080/2049677x.2025.2500222","title":"The reasonable person: a legal biography","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Comparative Legal History","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Biography; Art; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.0467847796578261,"score_gpt":0.3189757578113134,"score_spread":0.27219097815348725,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410086246","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012416063,0.013465199,0.00015486227,0.005820665,0.0019977323,0.00020909809,0.0000019362164,0.000106491076,0.96582794],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.79524964,0.00014016745,0.000039962073,0.00047273876,0.00023348625,0.00003394346,0.0000017442488,0.0000035319492,0.2038248],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989608,0.00021950956,0.00012313628,0.00019630519,0.00024073836,0.00025951964],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993929,0.00015816132,0.0000640709,0.00017881252,0.0001367124,0.00006929303],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00043295388,0.00009860894,0.00014392534,0.00009788958,0.0015104593,0.00009293677,0.0002693543,0.000058779442,0.00017044913],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000029748377,0.00007992046,0.00013172152,0.0003439762,0.00091564766,0.00024919273,0.000022497405,0.000191774,0.000050626753],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000035576268,0.000028127733,0.00025605122,0.0000021041815,0.000027684404,0.0000023047257,0.010091472,9.563405e-7,0.00008011993,0.57756215,0.41039768,0.001515776],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013925697,0.000027515778,0.0022545587,0.000013624075,0.000014890806,3.0407654e-7,0.00499442,0.00003196703,0.000027015678,0.0002378428,0.9921681,0.0000905019],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006737495,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0069570746,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7828336,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00053493306,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00051055476,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99987674},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410406545","doi":"10.17223/22253513/55/12","title":"Good faith in civil law: legislation, doctrine, case law","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta Pravo","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Doctrine; Legislation; Civil law (Civil law); Political science; Good faith; Faith; Common law; Public law; Philosophy; Theology","score_opus":0.010835086522614959,"score_gpt":0.27700078321015625,"score_spread":0.2661656966875413,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410406545","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1168893,0.00045612245,0.00044711155,0.0050906474,0.0006705356,0.00057106337,0.000032487205,0.0002674596,0.87557524],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98002946,0.00015010311,0.00023626475,0.00090411847,0.00017659995,0.000005734392,0.00002151962,0.000017831315,0.01845835],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976191,0.00036583093,0.00039477678,0.000554138,0.0004343109,0.00063185405],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987486,0.00023076433,0.00016163687,0.00046116527,0.00019600379,0.0002018409],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00081331335,0.00026418045,0.00033884426,0.00046853555,0.0012197739,0.00022830049,0.00043674043,0.00028222147,0.0003560303],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000046621808,0.0003114753,0.0001423418,0.0015333568,0.00058260857,0.0011758101,0.00015552093,0.00039480173,0.00007203672],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000051776762,0.00014393017,0.0030605732,0.000017122227,0.000051755313,0.0010097305,0.007030723,0.00006581091,0.00007742536,0.9846034,0.001729845,0.0021579284],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0013912318,0.00007448738,0.0014743037,0.000087061,0.00007663747,0.000042854354,0.005467545,0.00012079015,0.0000709233,0.0041348655,0.9867135,0.00034577507],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.049000528,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.22779046,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9849837,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005037997,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00041854242,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999337},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410785159","doi":"10.1093/9780199289011.003.0046","title":"Indirect Infringement","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.05774787078388627,"score_gpt":0.2836102972743134,"score_spread":0.22586242649042715,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410785159","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000010858229,0.00014933554,0.000028752167,0.0002603055,0.00048708238,0.00015553136,0.0000022536901,0.00013468224,0.9987712],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0025244555,0.0011260663,0.000049468385,0.00016631608,0.00049660745,0.000003775414,0.0000037379587,0.000014442247,0.9956151],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999298,0.000008740604,0.00012950043,0.00015405184,0.00026789465,0.00014185758],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99964607,0.000015894671,0.000079064106,0.00012905523,0.00005113857,0.00007879985],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00024558124,0.00010470711,0.00013150013,0.00007670937,0.00020063735,0.000034767454,0.00013262036,0.00021335275,0.029094052],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000069259145,0.00010022889,0.00008523118,0.000011443097,0.00009787464,0.000051950607,0.000042690244,0.00012207078,0.00089118147],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000019615918,0.000003898047,0.000019891053,0.0000024764013,0.000024613053,0.0000022777954,0.002603255,9.640646e-9,3.5074575e-7,0.93609804,0.0088407,0.052402508],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000342111,0.00001841538,0.000072718365,0.00002206363,0.000020655132,1.1140063e-7,0.00003218246,6.501123e-8,0.0000048261195,0.027392318,0.9722736,0.00012885385],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014718786,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0035811544,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9634329,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000767231,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000091484304,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99988675},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410785181","doi":"10.1093/9780199289011.003.0057","title":"Court Hierarchies and Appeal Routes","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.03460893872970739,"score_gpt":0.2672966941032091,"score_spread":0.23268775537350173,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410785181","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000059393602,0.000589779,0.000053465592,0.001273419,0.0002393196,0.00012761449,0.0000071705053,0.00009935335,0.9975505],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.008777027,0.003424537,0.00010738007,0.0001563384,0.00055401726,0.0000022320858,0.000005382703,0.0000151177155,0.98695797],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99932706,0.000011900204,0.00012124693,0.0001813073,0.00020944918,0.00014901765],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996498,0.0000404985,0.00006286045,0.00009866056,0.00004551976,0.00010266516],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001919921,0.00012231848,0.00015987376,0.00006789384,0.00030743008,0.00006577552,0.0000960647,0.00021264728,0.0029297357],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000007632838,0.00011000241,0.000057111316,0.000009071971,0.00038585634,0.000081016544,0.000046073594,0.00014239653,0.000101642305],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000041420885,0.0000027573424,0.00005517274,0.000004533486,0.000018248884,0.0000021408468,0.0027701445,2.9490548e-9,6.191898e-7,0.9622015,0.004391588,0.030549161],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000047558184,0.000026327945,0.00018365926,0.000024360994,0.000020480325,7.803164e-7,0.00014745089,4.933542e-7,0.0000011114162,0.08519004,0.91422373,0.00013402055],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003666264,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0048352354,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9098321,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003286012,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007007364,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9979817},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410785311","doi":"10.1093/9780199289011.003.0049","title":"Restrictions on Remedies","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Business","score_opus":0.08263441978788812,"score_gpt":0.3028758547031378,"score_spread":0.22024143491524972,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410785311","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000005641184,0.000088694724,0.000022403601,0.0013796604,0.0008814908,0.00013023695,0.000004566652,0.0001736217,0.9973137],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0016556664,0.0028181262,0.00003087478,0.0002149482,0.0009797302,0.0000040184236,0.0000044694793,0.0000152414505,0.99427694],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99924487,0.0000117097325,0.00013324777,0.00017621956,0.00029665246,0.00013730096],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995385,0.000052673626,0.000074799194,0.0001706225,0.00007826525,0.00008517341],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00015493327,0.0001108043,0.00012188298,0.000115013005,0.0004389353,0.000029251787,0.00011636252,0.00026993925,0.009554662],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000026854193,0.00010127909,0.00009901357,0.000020009968,0.00017213321,0.00004802206,0.000019260948,0.00019541846,0.0010729961],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000038941234,0.0000054217717,0.000004361986,0.000001051953,0.000013595139,0.0000022167837,0.0010330793,2.5648664e-8,3.4098147e-7,0.9461919,0.039081372,0.013662726],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003089786,0.000048347145,0.00006748825,0.000031254647,0.000019724486,1.9146738e-7,0.00006336698,8.464232e-8,0.0000018420147,0.063152626,0.9364724,0.000111770496],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027526137,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006081998,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.897391,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007361496,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000101915866,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997048},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410785493","doi":"10.1093/9780199677993.003.0009","title":"Statutory Reform in Other Jurisdictions","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statutory law; Business; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.07088974087683915,"score_gpt":0.3345669908827408,"score_spread":0.26367725000590164,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410785493","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000016863749,0.00043087607,0.000022002492,0.0010861462,0.00061443535,0.00021526687,0.000024228688,0.00014359449,0.9974466],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0013247787,0.00045913775,0.000049530703,0.00020447043,0.00066613196,0.000008249473,0.000010469481,0.000030427282,0.9972468],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988082,0.00002116266,0.00024854986,0.00022585584,0.0004633633,0.00023287303],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99941224,0.000021251155,0.00009517963,0.00020355724,0.00011960254,0.00014819937],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005896106,0.00015056993,0.00020174858,0.00020284181,0.00016971187,0.000043735126,0.00015206028,0.00039975767,0.006751084],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000010640942,0.00014114958,0.00008783366,0.000042698728,0.00019373072,0.00014427512,0.00003305049,0.0003043568,0.0005506647],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000059388435,0.000011367734,0.000021149594,0.000002599877,0.000012129021,0.0000041195663,0.0036127418,5.017345e-7,3.9458266e-7,0.9763106,0.011005679,0.009012748],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012795629,0.000024663543,0.000056514178,0.000036033343,0.000011751008,3.5741857e-7,0.0004301495,0.0000018770633,2.536325e-7,0.023428129,0.97570765,0.0001746515],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018805277,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08551709,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.964702,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011164667,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005387344,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9941569},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410902917","doi":"10.7166/36-1-3257","title":"Note from the Editor","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The South African Journal of Industrial Engineering","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.02114510440531773,"score_gpt":0.2569793044325815,"score_spread":0.23583420002726377,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410902917","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7195669,0.0016388224,0.019703103,0.12097499,0.1066357,0.0009446921,0.00007477784,0.00020589025,0.030255172],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9746032,0.0000142406025,0.000044245502,0.000082169914,0.025053684,0.0000012118728,1.9906125e-7,0.0000051447046,0.00019590938],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991132,0.00009954643,0.0002568405,0.00005383985,0.00030771273,0.0001688413],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990139,0.0005557074,0.00015888798,0.00011861558,0.000089500805,0.00006336331],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012554005,0.000070192706,0.00013098822,0.000052360137,0.00030479595,0.000097153505,0.00044434957,0.000085324755,0.00004756064],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010134424,0.000039969294,0.000110164714,0.00035580705,0.000082419145,0.00008044841,0.000031653468,0.00051440974,0.0000032810378],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001069841,0.0001433228,0.008173402,0.000010558528,0.0014291084,0.000044388635,0.4883038,0.032935347,0.0028567777,0.055796627,0.18494925,0.22428757],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00056955265,0.000034641533,0.00060205767,0.00011106917,0.000092921306,6.984323e-7,0.0109573845,0.00023937103,0.00010825147,0.00024211119,0.98696154,0.0000803915],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00041461113,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000025612811,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8020123,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008210439,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00028880461,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23442748},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411656813","doi":"10.51847/mkt45kkkki","title":"10.51847/mkT45kkkKi","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Time to knit","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Electronic signature; Signature (topology); Political science; Computer science; Mathematics; Geometry","score_opus":0.009664524410592174,"score_gpt":0.23153171557340926,"score_spread":0.22186719116281708,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411656813","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0031865987,0.000023713796,4.0819148e-7,0.0018636271,0.0000054294096,0.00011161355,0.000002904097,0.00013088102,0.9946748],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0023968623,0.0000015790187,0.000026548505,0.00009409723,0.00032510143,0.000006871597,0.0000026048776,0.000006589361,0.99713975],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99935615,0.000041548636,0.00008508415,0.00011924072,0.00019808691,0.00019989464],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996886,0.000027024029,0.000013289602,0.000107671796,0.00003247908,0.00013091772],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00021152153,0.000054035852,0.00007192911,0.000031249045,0.000261693,0.000056516663,0.0001302862,0.000048960403,0.995512],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002380807,0.000055501045,0.00003802412,0.00018029347,0.000047087855,0.00009368048,0.000010874774,0.00004294373,0.9671356],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001623968,0.000017507615,6.185168e-7,4.938545e-7,0.000003436703,0.0000011620017,0.00051234517,0.0000045785464,0.000013612596,0.00005022261,0.021219984,0.9781598],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007542399,0.000040082024,0.00013754643,0.000004185642,0.00000523709,3.3748802e-7,0.000009281071,0.000014917339,0.0000039758806,0.000007068873,0.99962217,0.000079774225],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007490002,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000010525989,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9784022,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000034329463,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000037250516,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22632669},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411656945","doi":"10.51847/ipjoxybrse","title":"10.51847/iPjoXybrSE","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Time to knit","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Position (finance); Law; Computer security; Business; Computer science; Political science","score_opus":0.009683966214258648,"score_gpt":0.23214000444692695,"score_spread":0.2224560382326683,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411656945","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0034507967,0.000022294276,3.620498e-7,0.0016982957,0.000005289195,0.0001108996,0.0000030673998,0.00012790377,0.9945811],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.002237845,0.0000016119037,0.00002777137,0.000100253936,0.00031199746,0.0000068622003,0.0000023298537,0.000006585696,0.99730474],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99935937,0.00004463673,0.000084314444,0.00011849989,0.0001953677,0.0001977915],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99967927,0.000025975476,0.000013106337,0.0001124757,0.000031735464,0.00013743405],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00022644535,0.000053203687,0.00007018477,0.000031798656,0.000256338,0.000053534506,0.0001262358,0.000046438632,0.99622774],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000024412464,0.00005507628,0.00003784303,0.00017705283,0.000048422455,0.0000968101,0.0000110097935,0.0000427122,0.97175896],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001696551,0.000019093588,5.060673e-7,4.99283e-7,0.0000033567912,0.0000014941011,0.00049867766,0.000005404018,0.000012082248,0.000050396244,0.021439435,0.97795206],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007266154,0.000040412466,0.00011626959,0.0000043012537,0.000005402618,3.804554e-7,0.000009809367,0.000015836551,0.0000033487163,0.0000076263686,0.99964553,0.00007840886],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007752587,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000010631135,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9782061,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000034194964,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000040968793,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22459456},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412091225","doi":"10.1093/law/9780192871114.003.0009","title":"Statutory Reform in Other Jurisdictions","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statutory law; Business; Law and economics; Law; Political science; Economics","score_opus":0.024158450273894537,"score_gpt":0.2517249303117463,"score_spread":0.22756648003785176,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412091225","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000035204732,0.000069941605,0.00006163456,0.00013139992,0.000380134,0.00033186446,0.00011395842,0.00014249829,0.99873334],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00041534135,0.00077436294,0.000045980094,0.00007988257,0.00014545843,0.0000010472437,0.0000108533,0.000016518854,0.99851054],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989255,0.00004576362,0.00016320735,0.00030886338,0.00028572037,0.00027095267],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993605,0.000043565553,0.00012683128,0.0002743698,0.0000886891,0.00010602089],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00019732385,0.00018793548,0.0002385117,0.00031903895,0.00046120063,0.00004252917,0.00033259657,0.0004564888,0.00017147174],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000048360102,0.00023069177,0.00015176857,0.00001930027,0.0002860946,0.00012198214,0.00013458006,0.00042946177,0.0000017843191],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039436123,0.000010339521,0.000011874908,0.000015822281,0.00004212377,0.000024162518,0.002590256,9.642683e-7,6.706472e-7,0.98372537,0.0015296151,0.0120093655],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002825365,0.000020298949,0.000035343284,0.0001400773,0.00006116005,2.2132762e-7,0.00040908073,0.0000051211405,0.0000021396438,0.0009769008,0.99785066,0.00021648926],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009610455,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013563167,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.996321,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011219393,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00044123436,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99698466},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412207960","doi":"","title":"Between Integration and Compatability:The Reconfiguration of Cognitive and Normative Structures in Transnational Hybrid Law","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"CBS Research Portal (Copenhagen Business School)","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Centre for International Governance Innovation","funders":"","keywords":"Control reconfiguration; Normative; Cognition; Law; Law and economics; Political science; Sociology; Psychology; Computer science; Neuroscience; Embedded system","score_opus":0.0707842954916354,"score_gpt":0.3744293849555574,"score_spread":0.303645089463922,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412207960","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9719879,0.0001726794,0.00024687222,0.004408658,0.00004403892,0.0011226658,0.00005161379,0.000012199455,0.021953344],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993621,0.000083120976,0.00004942374,0.000039413102,0.00009139337,0.00008307992,0.000100345525,0.0000067718483,0.00018435113],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99804085,0.0005414927,0.00035242716,0.00023062366,0.0005971635,0.00023746045],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99776644,0.0006849527,0.00009897508,0.000096475036,0.0012313244,0.00012181708],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018575377,0.000097819786,0.000184664,0.00014498513,0.0005091287,0.00029997833,0.00013924592,0.00007229467,0.0025649802],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008338859,0.00007583449,0.000020244554,0.0005021762,0.0009861082,0.0013619412,0.000042383275,0.000312551,0.000019180588],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00042368966,0.00037067523,0.096466124,0.0003690423,0.00021806234,0.000022236449,0.076542765,0.000024125131,0.008530295,0.5336411,0.0057536056,0.2776383],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00042428146,0.00004585069,0.9758888,0.00006393976,0.000010268771,0.0000019439153,0.010257944,0.0001034887,0.0015583207,0.010112598,0.0014245278,0.00010802525],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013521028,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011105628,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.87942266,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000040961768,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002188912,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9983468},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412264572","doi":"","title":"Book Review: Review of Lucja Biel: Lost in the Eurofog: The Textual Fit of Translated Law. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang 2014. (=Studies in Language, Culture and Society, Volume 2).","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen)","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Centre for International Governance Innovation","funders":"China Postdoctoral Science Foundation","keywords":"Volume (thermodynamics); Sociology; Media studies; Law and economics; Physics","score_opus":0.07244303586737372,"score_gpt":0.3605769821235284,"score_spread":0.2881339462561547,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412264572","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.025031997,0.80155504,0.000015085044,0.01315739,0.00003109461,0.00157216,0.00008964923,0.0000102700615,0.1585373],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.19682124,0.47355777,0.000069183894,0.0012669809,0.000030139565,4.9019906e-7,0.000021611986,0.000012169991,0.32822043],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99642575,0.0018011552,0.00024368153,0.0002428461,0.00096148293,0.00032510972],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99828047,0.00044502967,0.00023988012,0.0004043199,0.00053826533,0.000092035734],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0055767437,0.00013450817,0.0005106692,0.00008109895,0.00052128645,0.000011334313,0.0011169107,0.00010821662,0.024915066],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015684876,0.00010025415,0.00020776923,0.0009964046,0.0022922677,0.0003565199,0.0003666179,0.00038786998,0.0007807849],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010453626,0.000059400412,0.000011102913,0.001219916,0.00008063307,0.000033730306,0.09040944,0.0000020698385,0.00016923773,0.00018895137,0.9071909,0.00053004513],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006504412,0.00014030188,0.0014485191,0.002157339,0.00010030275,0.0000030678589,0.07965498,0.000018171919,0.00004808138,0.000004471812,0.9156784,0.0000959752],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006417955,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0080377115,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3279973,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013594796,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00026698713,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999972},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412270705","doi":"","title":"Book review: A Game of Chinese Chess. Kun Fan “Arbitration in China: A Legal and Cultural Analysis” Oxford, 2013. 366 s.","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen)","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Centre for International Governance Innovation","funders":"","keywords":"Arbitration; China; Advertising; History; Media studies; Political science; Law; Sociology; Business","score_opus":0.01621905281576614,"score_gpt":0.29930246002910954,"score_spread":0.2830834072133434,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412270705","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.68240726,0.058888197,0.00062329357,0.006907425,0.00003995816,0.001231738,0.00005088215,0.000028682485,0.24982256],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7726348,0.021755176,0.000069395785,0.00008350899,0.000019157396,1.7029934e-7,0.000029233686,0.0000060262378,0.2054025],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969429,0.0012228099,0.00022817867,0.00034303093,0.00088292983,0.00038016576],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99839896,0.00025423826,0.0003038451,0.000384812,0.00047007998,0.00018804404],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030029055,0.00014965449,0.0005845663,0.0003063195,0.0008502959,0.000028622046,0.0007933988,0.00013056771,0.08510096],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014930776,0.00014777583,0.00025261022,0.0017507452,0.00129766,0.00091933226,0.000398128,0.0003051623,0.0006008481],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005728533,0.00017916695,0.0003095854,0.0004093394,0.00037220202,0.000025859816,0.029069409,0.00006436117,0.0017882304,0.0009097315,0.96383494,0.0024642977],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007934757,0.00016280034,0.06283611,0.00017161704,0.00019101027,0.0000010736819,0.004618681,0.0006100327,0.00007638537,0.0000096041485,0.93038636,0.00014285742],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01945318,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.038908307,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.090227574,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001911552,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00025217386,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98707634},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412551459","doi":"10.1080/20403313.2024.2402641","title":"Form, function, and property in <i>Bound by Convention</i>","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Jurisprudence","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Convention; Property (philosophy); Function (biology); Law and economics; Law; Political science; Sociology; Philosophy; Biology; Epistemology; Cell biology","score_opus":0.008798589737944564,"score_gpt":0.2900367113578773,"score_spread":0.2812381216199327,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412551459","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.66308236,0.0023517574,0.002605729,0.018193783,0.0012691546,0.0007674656,0.000007085611,0.00017071037,0.31155193],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96036446,0.00047946934,0.000021849926,0.0006375093,0.00005121085,0.000028436241,0.0000019712259,0.0000030051956,0.03841206],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999268,0.00005623034,0.00015066843,0.00018169834,0.00016734093,0.00017608883],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997317,0.000043698114,0.000035580695,0.00008870704,0.000053268843,0.00004702624],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00045330974,0.000060624105,0.00008677496,0.000061864266,0.00031594638,0.0001037706,0.000094630144,0.00007355924,0.00009025522],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000059926748,0.00004926292,0.00002198109,0.00031556928,0.00017345352,0.00029489657,0.000031149968,0.0000922286,0.000013337289],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015078357,0.00034559282,0.38485038,0.00010594962,0.000039390197,0.0000056135364,0.008931328,0.0000017219666,0.003923203,0.3075285,0.15201719,0.14210035],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028581402,0.000026652873,0.042001016,0.00004875583,0.000008090532,2.256738e-7,0.0004853817,0.00002770092,0.00008508708,0.007951797,0.94900215,0.0000773056],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0040184157,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0040333727,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.796985,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006207413,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011727507,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.60746694},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412638469","doi":"10.1080/20403313.2025.2535809","title":"Elucidating Law","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Jurisprudence","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Law and economics; Economics","score_opus":0.010975571518249199,"score_gpt":0.36734181345539907,"score_spread":0.3563662419371499,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412638469","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.025001254,0.00019946742,0.0027666765,0.005765744,0.00064626825,0.00012049492,9.4016497e-7,0.00016207741,0.9653371],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98569643,0.00007514834,0.0003304116,0.0011564647,0.00017871747,0.0000096673275,5.851283e-7,0.0000027945382,0.012549798],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992824,0.00005670487,0.00011741482,0.0001465321,0.00020333234,0.00019359528],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996279,0.00009325935,0.000034298653,0.00013683901,0.00006075621,0.000046966597],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004349918,0.00005019947,0.00007043605,0.00003824498,0.0006339647,0.00009854374,0.00019705387,0.00005969087,0.00019370893],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000099708115,0.00005227826,0.000037516038,0.00028367477,0.00016583706,0.00019077152,0.00004077712,0.00008777753,0.000074700445],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000030362703,0.000014791044,0.0014536973,0.0000047786734,0.0000046082832,0.0000018186406,0.0020206396,0.0000015177746,0.00037042564,0.9736507,0.0022891888,0.020184802],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000072855415,0.0000072626085,0.0032964603,0.000038694805,0.000006534347,1.3702088e-7,0.0005720465,0.000023667511,0.00091138424,0.0066144266,0.9883902,0.00006631321],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004630619,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030885532,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98610103,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005500685,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000109389315,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.70001423},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412733033","doi":"10.38131/kpilj.2025.6.31.1.259","title":"Recognition and Enforcement of Korean Judgments in Foreign Courts - Practical Cases in the United States, Canada, and Australia -","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Korea Private International Law Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Enforcement; Political science; Psychology; Law; Criminology","score_opus":0.0629483475204991,"score_gpt":0.3496436952614157,"score_spread":0.2866953477409166,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412733033","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97930014,0.000017272736,0.000034443143,0.004165959,0.00016703704,0.00012844408,0.000037052578,0.0000022938523,0.016147377],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99893284,0.00039161663,0.00008909572,0.00040540242,0.00004687968,0.0000044492713,0.000044284567,0.0000020614173,0.00008335393],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99899906,0.00013505806,0.0002872473,0.00008420042,0.00036388266,0.00013056441],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994603,0.00022790444,0.00012307536,0.000037902624,0.000105792424,0.00004506513],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00081304647,0.000060774757,0.000082061604,0.00013520406,0.00015841446,0.00009641441,0.00009970035,0.000037156613,0.00014103754],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013694647,0.000048759226,0.000013762263,0.000119767275,0.00012417423,0.00019807651,0.000028924185,0.00017704467,1.9784255e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017251345,0.0001293273,0.06812766,0.000012763175,0.000068759095,0.0001903186,0.003081727,0.00006225962,0.000021219323,0.9229392,0.0010198787,0.004174363],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0036559727,0.00025493352,0.2826428,0.0007634464,0.000083977175,0.00036620692,0.013533137,0.0011916506,0.0004459364,0.24377222,0.45292947,0.00036025234],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.84894955,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8764159,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.679167,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019629073,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00012929137,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19883436},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412991010","doi":"10.1139/cjas-2024-0139","title":"Note of appreciation","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Animal Science","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Chemistry; Psychology; Biology","score_opus":0.016364977452616232,"score_gpt":0.3106706430431921,"score_spread":0.29430566559057586,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412991010","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.85522944,0.00018200553,0.00051237934,0.0040832777,0.00078249746,0.000053705273,0.0000022469983,0.0000029381295,0.13915151],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994219,0.000017835779,0.00021975079,0.000092190116,0.000096067946,1.3421582e-7,3.9902883e-8,8.893124e-7,0.00015122673],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992761,0.00002656684,0.00018042728,0.00006037671,0.00027041446,0.0001861103],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990898,0.000033917782,0.00013947775,0.000048296413,0.00042928694,0.00025923253],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013775401,0.000029372572,0.00007663891,0.00033383694,0.00041930997,0.0000659367,0.00031975989,0.000030728745,0.00008052781],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00048488574,0.000028107239,0.00003917947,0.00089332653,0.0006133636,0.00034263814,0.000006617535,0.000071056034,0.0000017388668],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007397957,0.000037124097,0.06216249,0.00001833502,0.000018882842,0.00002513512,0.035155747,0.000057344165,0.145845,0.596554,0.004013886,0.15603812],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022661083,0.00026155575,0.5098129,0.000118194934,0.000021376907,0.00000427907,0.0027685817,0.0001167308,0.004334608,0.0032120196,0.47901958,0.00010354137],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024174845,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.060677327,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.59334195,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024020029,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006200969,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994329},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413026716","doi":"10.1017/9781009340267.006","title":"Liverpool 1974","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"History","score_opus":0.022806537720165956,"score_gpt":0.23393086826131518,"score_spread":0.2111243305411492,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413026716","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000025406729,0.00014478678,0.00013149754,0.00012639583,0.00056835986,0.00037052247,0.0001149717,0.00021647422,0.99830157],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00057411176,0.0005902019,0.000027874692,0.00010263826,0.00037553158,4.3051787e-7,0.000022147144,0.000015406718,0.9982917],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988276,0.00004594959,0.00013110168,0.0003764497,0.00035003613,0.00026888872],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990813,0.00008802591,0.00014423642,0.00032645595,0.00019003008,0.00016995547],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00015834125,0.00022268463,0.00027436516,0.00017921139,0.0006728316,0.0000706243,0.0004718825,0.00046743007,0.00003634082],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000015225604,0.0002930702,0.00023448917,0.000011090251,0.0003864945,0.00008901436,0.00022817364,0.00036628658,0.000029828192],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027999798,0.0000047751073,0.0000015459391,0.000022437496,0.000069918955,0.000074476375,0.00034068275,1.3432975e-7,0.0000034918917,0.8950624,0.0940061,0.010386071],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002234514,0.000019457399,0.000012919002,0.0001453219,0.0001745344,6.360452e-7,0.00012505295,0.000003587382,0.000022670145,0.00001923742,0.99897546,0.000277679],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031346576,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00015546456,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90496933,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00036854172,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004105844,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99995214},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413131219","doi":"10.1017/cyl.2025.10023","title":"Canadian Cases in Private International Law in 2024","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Yearbook of international Law/Annuaire canadien de droit international","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Thompson Rivers University","funders":"","keywords":"Content (measure theory); Law; Action (physics); Business; Political science; Mathematics; Physics","score_opus":0.008136756780978237,"score_gpt":0.2669299365593608,"score_spread":0.25879317977838256,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413131219","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09344055,0.00007800234,0.000015027232,0.02054391,0.00409649,0.00030963408,0.0005962691,0.000024179253,0.8808959],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95958275,0.00008583408,0.00014396058,0.0036787805,0.00040506193,0.000059251815,0.0001627064,0.00002181655,0.035859853],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99745125,0.00008874021,0.0006548337,0.00045830567,0.0005968405,0.0007500421],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99831086,0.00014799727,0.0001423535,0.00022961062,0.00049833243,0.00067083206],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007992187,0.00021688383,0.000262355,0.0019845173,0.0001999626,0.00019048713,0.0013415741,0.00026781778,0.0022489592],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00044237837,0.000300344,0.00013210434,0.00045608007,0.00033870756,0.0005151653,0.00006896002,0.0004057732,0.000038340502],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032765834,0.000035807363,0.061909456,0.0000063148573,0.00010276082,0.0005170911,0.0013434818,0.00014704866,0.000016622253,0.9314336,0.0029567208,0.0014982971],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006345902,0.000020941796,0.029876105,0.0003073831,0.0000105092895,0.000026498908,0.00077932375,0.000612904,0.00005388724,0.018809127,0.94857967,0.00028907481],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99212426,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99980134,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9456229,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01334431,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0045894394,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99994487},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413186588","doi":"10.32920/29896169","title":"Is It Time to Regulate Collaborative Practice?","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Process management; Computer science; Knowledge management","score_opus":0.029264642588121653,"score_gpt":0.39063425734414,"score_spread":0.3613696147560183,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413186588","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00026050583,0.00008346638,0.00021014287,0.21138269,0.0005069295,0.0006075252,0.000048988786,0.000102096725,0.78679764],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0022544577,0.00042297647,0.0035040015,0.011516241,0.00045907684,0.00006155685,0.000014245317,0.0000078638095,0.9817596],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984509,0.000234703,0.0002264603,0.00041049928,0.00044995252,0.00022753177],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99842405,0.0002242492,0.00014313465,0.00032066143,0.0007442148,0.00014368963],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00084069045,0.00014774501,0.00022939719,0.00011354941,0.00035795968,0.00028501192,0.00030334038,0.00031598017,0.010651614],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00048820724,0.00014927993,0.00008382926,0.00045897256,0.00007335152,0.00014965166,0.00040270502,0.00024983753,0.0017124556],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005493228,0.000059502137,0.0000106540965,0.000018202734,0.00012863593,0.0000043132086,0.070854396,0.00003839728,0.000019332529,0.018651493,0.8879779,0.022182263],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000064099266,0.000021688242,0.000053360858,0.00007809072,0.00004982173,9.5522104e-8,0.0026819194,0.000061578125,0.00007189015,0.0009786932,0.99576527,0.00017348211],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005314845,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0010545262,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19986644,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018572625,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012397387,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9990648},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413405698","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780190879679.001.0001","title":"American Law in a Global Context","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Political science; Law; Law and economics; History; Sociology; Archaeology","score_opus":0.01404078272785415,"score_gpt":0.31849943873650766,"score_spread":0.3044586560086535,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413405698","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00002703327,0.00016175126,0.00002105604,0.0023597698,0.00032157308,0.00018066193,0.000019680803,0.00007378139,0.9968347],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0113698635,0.00017284078,0.00002193013,0.002184128,0.00023903666,0.000007197614,0.000010213733,0.0000035114922,0.9859913],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991796,0.000052710577,0.0001562358,0.00019046554,0.0002306324,0.00019035107],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996562,0.000058276324,0.00006874867,0.0001117709,0.000045780507,0.000059219266],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00019150556,0.00009893602,0.00023001256,0.00003803446,0.00012290738,0.0000568148,0.00017078055,0.00014266661,0.00058684475],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000019343604,0.00010076595,0.00007977704,0.00015444077,0.00042594562,0.000044893473,0.000037421898,0.00013288452,0.00006967778],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000045420425,0.00000867855,0.00010829099,0.000003419553,0.000007726012,0.0000037753507,0.0005679051,5.7425343e-8,2.436219e-8,0.8749706,0.05367101,0.070653975],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008905043,0.000017506034,0.00016961248,0.000051677045,0.000008400306,8.5838536e-8,0.00059609936,9.3892567e-7,1.1287097e-7,0.01323271,0.9857313,0.00010251305],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.14648512,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.60858524,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9320603,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000616318,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009267144,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8591985},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414118994","doi":"10.37381/6bksdp60","title":"Book Review: Mixed Jurisdictions Worldwide: The Third Legal Family, by Vernon Valentine Palmer","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Tulane European and Civil Law Forum","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Work (physics); Legislation; Subject (documents)","score_opus":0.007211965514747228,"score_gpt":0.24020845802683788,"score_spread":0.23299649251209065,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414118994","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0040907874,0.10751503,0.000022830121,0.018070968,0.00077527115,0.00045847008,0.000031703374,0.00015504441,0.8688799],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.49894917,0.090395756,0.000007884769,0.053020127,0.0005866832,0.000015682095,0.000082249884,0.0000613245,0.3568811],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981543,0.0004865151,0.00027258825,0.00029354333,0.0003840866,0.00040898958],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99930865,0.00006861055,0.000113416434,0.00032361475,0.000052530442,0.000133178],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010999398,0.00016296978,0.00020227447,0.000023723425,0.00083400955,0.00015229097,0.00027259215,0.00003918923,0.001154381],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000017104354,0.000121012534,0.00011178787,0.00015762821,0.00025079833,0.00025998027,0.00010870749,0.00023217229,0.0006700758],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000945569,0.000039228536,0.0004421821,0.00004243107,0.000025670406,0.000005561612,0.0004887852,3.6188544e-7,0.0001709912,0.028840667,0.96688765,0.00304704],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002794336,0.0000587985,0.0032242567,0.00017964741,0.000050868453,0.0000040180294,0.00023162462,0.0000072300513,0.000014163326,0.000028015551,0.9957555,0.00016647151],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0011406633,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013514754,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5119988,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000023900904,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000027845792,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997587},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414119062","doi":"10.37381/p1jhme57","title":"Civil Liability in a Mixed Jurisdiction: Quebec and the Network of Ratio Communis","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Tulane European and Civil Law Forum","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Liability; Legal liability; Legislation; Government (linguistics); Civil rights","score_opus":0.007974544654062023,"score_gpt":0.22826010192935264,"score_spread":0.22028555727529062,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414119062","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.45802978,0.0006175554,0.000026620419,0.0027054243,0.00024138844,0.0003131649,0.000003992649,0.000034843608,0.5380272],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965228,0.00033969677,0.000010072291,0.00028296307,0.000116385054,0.000002828074,0.0000052140117,0.000008987084,0.0027110446],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982126,0.0009910734,0.00024329827,0.00015762822,0.00016851611,0.00022692895],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993607,0.00020411286,0.00009291204,0.0002455288,0.000039218794,0.000057556284],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002326787,0.00009095533,0.0002001484,0.000012581086,0.00036686435,0.00007481529,0.0001454324,0.00003874997,0.00013890774],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000025402205,0.00006842502,0.00004440587,0.00013802429,0.0006631146,0.00012474961,0.000112825044,0.00015248734,0.000012615847],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014644522,0.00006069858,0.058162685,0.00003113123,0.00002182391,0.0000026675666,0.014071288,0.000027024671,0.00002944887,0.9182485,0.0009908016,0.008207516],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020062923,0.000111661415,0.26840985,0.00008487332,0.000023630446,0.000002387401,0.0042745047,0.0003030729,0.000007947416,0.0033199934,0.7212817,0.00017408664],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.029852832,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.42661798,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9149285,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000021487285,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003200182,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97660744},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414582886","doi":"10.21608/jlr.2025.385720.1742","title":"Nationality of Children Born Through Surrogacy Abroad: A Conflict of Laws Perspective / جنسية الأطفال المولودين عبر الأم البديلة في الخارج منظور في تنازع القوانين","year":2025,"lang":"ar","type":"article","venue":"مجلة البحوث الفقهية والقانونية","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nationality; Legislature; Statelessness; Conflict of laws; Human rights; Sovereignty; Perspective (graphical); Foreign national","score_opus":0.026535816613431996,"score_gpt":0.3773307367666614,"score_spread":0.3507949201532294,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414582886","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5309152,0.010538578,0.0009694728,0.014102803,0.0037691179,0.0035287065,0.0020647072,0.000446665,0.43366474],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98046994,0.0031084323,0.00060312526,0.00093670917,0.0011585414,0.00009712012,0.00019802092,0.00010590188,0.013322185],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9891441,0.0016482092,0.002751811,0.0020481066,0.0027494063,0.0016583995],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9910758,0.0015033562,0.0021126207,0.0016450761,0.003204563,0.00045858286],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035819844,0.0012073838,0.0023160027,0.0007152517,0.0016860755,0.00029050992,0.0019009552,0.0012099431,0.0031823665],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016234239,0.0012964506,0.0014823757,0.0036070603,0.0028793805,0.0013938479,0.00068851205,0.0014532199,0.00027067986],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013031978,0.00352408,0.05711716,0.0006637601,0.0034323607,0.000023398112,0.11983322,0.00017596336,0.0017663056,0.7833607,0.022018442,0.0067813797],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.011232485,0.0018881721,0.27107212,0.0021043818,0.0024815688,0.000029958392,0.04912902,0.00049954344,0.0126063805,0.031213505,0.6144092,0.0033336633],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.050514102,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0050660335,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7521472,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011557018,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024460922,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99983424},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414848184","doi":"10.1017/s0922156525100526","title":"Post-jurisdiction (The erosion of jurisdiction doctrine)","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Leiden Journal of International Law","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Territoriality; International law; Subject-matter jurisdiction; Doctrine; Exclusive jurisdiction; Human rights; Federal jurisdiction; Criminal jurisdiction","score_opus":0.010672265236716974,"score_gpt":0.30807002222453217,"score_spread":0.2973977569878152,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414848184","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5348316,0.00087824644,0.0080008125,0.06358914,0.009319901,0.0003558436,0.000020215668,0.000050293827,0.38295397],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9944884,0.0005277585,0.0001554887,0.00043563556,0.00076834485,0.000002437615,0.0000031167142,0.0000049022,0.0036139083],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99833965,0.00014382154,0.00058539916,0.00009437214,0.00071321515,0.00012356215],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99791074,0.00017259341,0.0005325739,0.0001060292,0.0012274715,0.000050574377],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001130437,0.00008102611,0.000154894,0.00021745652,0.00030874283,0.00008044772,0.00042995147,0.00008492643,0.00022500523],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017860104,0.00006171832,0.0001978386,0.0002443515,0.000250957,0.0004858078,0.00003435754,0.00023397783,0.00000790088],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027989002,0.00017733658,0.0062802252,0.000008273976,0.00016462116,0.0000050652734,0.0030057118,0.00011635377,0.008461423,0.9622914,0.0021610537,0.017048633],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011425706,0.00028510523,0.063183054,0.0005206153,0.00015136837,0.000033406828,0.0016842777,0.00014546298,0.007845427,0.020966895,0.9038955,0.00014633531],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001564833,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00071816857,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94132453,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002072356,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00021423333,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25168},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4417001220","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.5812702","title":"Recoding Family Law: Toward a Theory of Relationships of Economic and Emotional Interdependency in the Civil Code of Québec","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Interdependence; Normative; Civil code; Code (set theory); Conceptual framework; Family law","score_opus":0.0425876866076393,"score_gpt":0.3081006798319529,"score_spread":0.2655129932243136,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4417001220","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8946522,0.012403771,0.005914833,0.004976919,0.0006063976,0.0004677975,0.000067034605,0.000012890651,0.08089817],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99137586,0.008075838,0.0000342948,0.0000164548,0.00010362821,0.0000040367336,0.0000025373133,0.000004459507,0.00038288382],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977615,0.0008820771,0.0005748437,0.00014737887,0.00022582995,0.00040840602],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986905,0.0005082027,0.00055757584,0.0001272907,0.00009328035,0.000023175318],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008987359,0.00009990581,0.00027390942,0.00018131275,0.00016835601,0.000023030834,0.00037747493,0.00016914571,0.000034515644],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016399453,0.00008566932,0.00014094482,0.000077095654,0.0002467581,0.00007773596,0.000100180056,0.001785736,3.7742626e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004123277,0.000024938772,0.0060602506,0.000038645612,0.000089312336,1.8703975e-7,0.01620632,0.00009988793,0.0000172988,0.97005415,0.000012730273,0.0073550497],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030127438,0.00009006839,0.011942496,0.00043079554,0.00006541015,0.0000089987525,0.026691893,0.000057770856,0.000017340824,0.95932347,0.0009749146,0.00009557473],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03022873,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.48096353,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4507348,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007186938,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006888767,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99874127},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4417288444","doi":"10.1017/9781108966221.006","title":"Processes of Legalisation in Transnational Litigation","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Work (physics); Globalization; Legislation","score_opus":0.02670998176512969,"score_gpt":0.23903912354345927,"score_spread":0.21232914177832957,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4417288444","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0035876476,0.00010456856,0.00076854846,0.0005006253,0.00034143278,0.0007657285,0.0003390137,0.00004182743,0.9935506],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.38099313,0.00038399952,0.000044968627,0.000025155416,0.00008726242,0.0000013957365,0.00008530317,0.0000109222165,0.61836785],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99797255,0.00013479583,0.00049085176,0.0005031204,0.00063940743,0.00025926324],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99812025,0.0002335355,0.00047608602,0.00021652202,0.00084853626,0.0001050759],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00038651616,0.00029504613,0.00044231614,0.00053240964,0.0003528612,0.00005277072,0.0003997128,0.0005365004,0.000023239423],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000053022115,0.00040983627,0.00019415913,0.00008944353,0.0006601079,0.00039387355,0.000077146346,0.00035414333,7.9388946e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001563571,0.000040716408,0.00006025403,0.0004947149,0.000068021356,0.000011086948,0.0023551174,0.000022284361,0.0000646487,0.9934206,0.00024214211,0.0030640364],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010346965,0.00007954321,0.0007509857,0.0006671337,0.00023912743,7.7798614e-7,0.00090414117,0.00020199374,0.0009931944,0.00011209295,0.994599,0.0004173173],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0023655891,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003787768,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9943569,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00038660027,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011847425,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998354},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W45745707","doi":"","title":"Improved Knight Coverings.","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ars Combinatoria","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Knight; Mathematics; Physics","score_opus":0.011955711676823159,"score_gpt":0.26542991653165043,"score_spread":0.2534742048548273,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W45745707","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.55183905,0.00012773776,0.00001948078,0.00048756902,0.003343911,0.00016175126,9.900186e-7,0.0001294793,0.44389004],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9940041,0.00006599374,0.000056652243,0.00012539484,0.000018091569,0.000008604823,9.26959e-7,0.000008363586,0.005711885],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992064,0.000091160684,0.00011435255,0.00014628841,0.00019650665,0.00024525943],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995882,0.00004409834,0.0000476481,0.00014046571,0.00006896274,0.000110609784],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00043638615,0.000070643524,0.00009372218,0.000029356454,0.00040516673,0.0000722524,0.00011721201,0.00008069208,0.00048290862],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016062726,0.000074132244,0.000051094135,0.00019054984,0.00008212562,0.00015907973,0.00001351748,0.00008968504,0.00007789893],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000030201354,0.000037891583,0.0012462039,0.0000016244347,0.0000069994067,0.0000016227992,0.0018398844,1.5899506e-7,0.00034140708,0.99410236,0.001401322,0.0010175161],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037448236,0.000038997823,0.00094723614,0.0000043764703,0.0000068656136,4.956784e-7,0.00034164882,0.0000088239985,0.000763229,0.10419624,0.8932025,0.000115107745],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007501184,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00014483553,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8918012,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000803505,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011159979,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5287511},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W46635493","doi":"10.29173/alr58","title":"Same-Sex Marriages in Canadian Private International Law","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Spouse; Law; Parliament; Residence; Government (linguistics); Conflict of laws; Jurisdiction; Family law; Position (finance); Political science; Politics; Marriage law; Choice of law; Sociology; Economics","score_opus":0.01688912670945522,"score_gpt":0.30087814510298344,"score_spread":0.2839890183935282,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W46635493","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004661423,0.0051281196,5.2997683e-7,0.051907893,0.00039470452,0.00052131887,0.000002566859,0.000014895152,0.9373686],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91717446,0.03645786,0.00006935526,0.02559788,0.0003213974,0.00012538768,0.000026573634,0.000015349287,0.020211766],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990324,0.000105449486,0.00021992174,0.00015981145,0.00018272088,0.0002997453],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994365,0.00009606386,0.000052848998,0.0001516272,0.000048340964,0.00021463336],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004209174,0.000080313686,0.00016629304,0.000029520965,0.00017663224,0.00009385458,0.00026798318,0.00005697182,0.0061353277],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000118572185,0.00007466033,0.00005723601,0.0001402357,0.00011025502,0.00030990163,0.000025434189,0.00008830012,0.00075157505],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[2.7354977e-7,0.000009426357,0.002793779,0.00004339188,0.000008452296,0.0000017593412,0.00054279156,1.083792e-7,0.0000026088132,0.98031074,0.0029101835,0.0133765],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005950952,0.000004846069,0.0017789027,0.00042834572,0.0000069137855,7.513997e-7,0.000021399814,0.0000046680293,0.0000026157747,0.0016491499,0.99595046,0.000092452276],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99187905,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99563557,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99304026,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00015624324,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00010165246,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9947732},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W566814400","doi":"10.1017/cbo9781139034937","title":"Foreign Relations Law","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Public law; Political science; Comparative law; Municipal law; Jurisdiction; Public international law; Foreign relations; International law; Private law; Foreign policy; Politics","score_opus":0.021979728799054007,"score_gpt":0.22939872526748697,"score_spread":0.20741899646843298,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W566814400","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000172952,0.000044018187,0.0006235947,0.00006501899,0.00030647794,0.00034493103,0.0000777946,0.00022761381,0.9982933],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0016412665,0.000039092065,0.000044152144,0.000121174475,0.00061343546,7.986003e-7,0.00006324266,0.000023157076,0.9974537],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99876606,0.00014740779,0.00013371163,0.00031780568,0.00035079703,0.00028418496],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99900246,0.00012560749,0.00017459948,0.0003301813,0.00017152539,0.00019563305],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00025516294,0.00018217551,0.00024154058,0.00009759538,0.0011140859,0.00007525162,0.00040181377,0.00048036696,0.00002160045],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000014829552,0.000235648,0.00019827379,0.000014878402,0.00057549006,0.00012309011,0.00012184324,0.0003610428,0.00005805493],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009168614,0.0000039819797,0.0000016177136,0.00000970948,0.000028756227,0.000013634095,0.00027985743,7.845329e-7,7.6195283e-7,0.75518703,0.24404748,0.0004172109],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022843032,0.0000221765,0.000009517333,0.000062635474,0.00013552542,8.7973257e-7,0.00013212301,0.00001407822,0.00000491126,0.00013536021,0.999001,0.00025333164],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003412811,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00036879253,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7550517,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004881541,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000421146,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96094465},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W577616740","doi":"","title":"Modern Chinese Legal Reform: New Perspectives","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ontario Tech University","funders":"","keywords":"Democratization; Political science; Politics; Legal realism; Law; China; Civil liberties; Context (archaeology); Legal research; Public administration; Democracy; Sociology; Geography","score_opus":0.0143000140724539,"score_gpt":0.2934767265924045,"score_spread":0.2791767125199506,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W577616740","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00015432629,0.0010551923,0.0002295098,0.00374552,0.00045395503,0.00029254978,0.0000040691507,0.00023325364,0.99383163],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0029494644,0.00094401423,0.00013864678,0.00014429147,0.0036119414,0.000006927982,0.000014020585,0.000027821665,0.9921629],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986813,0.000030853924,0.00018111008,0.00032091493,0.0005022189,0.0002835853],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99925977,0.000024932557,0.00010668943,0.00023523146,0.00014242252,0.00023095847],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001740453,0.00021254572,0.0002606332,0.000096013,0.00036607488,0.0002323474,0.00029057366,0.00037541133,0.0076463046],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000029601242,0.00016288584,0.00018639065,0.000067927955,0.00017345986,0.00042036985,0.00005831389,0.00029707566,0.0006652221],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000071511454,0.000021260968,0.000010721211,0.000006485864,0.00005422506,0.0000033002866,0.026280044,5.3470166e-7,0.0000034719772,0.6685951,0.2758099,0.029207803],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000114987735,0.000026788142,0.00014306605,0.000017983108,0.000016955846,9.153442e-7,0.001604369,0.000027676106,2.4007483e-7,0.032110445,0.9657084,0.00022821485],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05899968,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015525261,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.68989843,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008240557,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014538141,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99326086},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W58397629","doi":"10.21991/c9pm3h","title":"RIGHTS BROUGHT HOME: THE UNITED KINGDOM ADOPTS A \"CHARTER OF RIGHTS\"","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Kingdom; Law; Political science; Human rights; Public administration","score_opus":0.05191623041426489,"score_gpt":0.2862027304870549,"score_spread":0.23428650007279003,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W58397629","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18379816,0.0007237012,0.06757988,0.010072304,0.008119553,0.0021737355,0.00047227595,0.00062499166,0.7264354],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9978336,0.000034709636,0.0005537905,0.0005930795,0.00028560206,0.00006306799,0.00007419239,0.000007601295,0.0005543695],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99707913,0.00020270576,0.00069174706,0.00043894266,0.0008048324,0.00078262534],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980461,0.0002246133,0.00034111794,0.00047022654,0.0006566951,0.0002612651],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006809382,0.00031256012,0.00035302344,0.0003530034,0.003876555,0.00008822935,0.0006439582,0.00028300242,0.0013891478],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013542308,0.00023159862,0.0003133286,0.0009267709,0.012060848,0.0007417582,0.00013248344,0.0003322411,0.00019334],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008468105,0.00017340011,0.0057796733,0.0000070595543,0.00010007322,0.000015318314,0.0015485843,0.000024849513,0.000048643782,0.9878973,0.0041250857,0.00019537349],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010191771,0.00007023002,0.001703714,0.00012803978,0.00010406559,0.00005942317,0.0011766757,0.00011211386,0.00040161618,0.105787136,0.8890489,0.0003889445],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01357429,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0046076123,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88492376,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018568056,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010362606,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995237},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W587900359","doi":"10.4324/9781315874067-7","title":"Equality in Asia-Pacific : reality or a contradiction in terms?","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Routledge eBooks","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Contradiction; Gender studies; China; Sociology; Constitutionalism; Political science; Colonialism; Human sexuality; Sexual orientation; Law; Democracy; Politics","score_opus":0.07307751012844488,"score_gpt":0.335448266776132,"score_spread":0.2623707566476871,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W587900359","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00082256494,0.00009709121,0.000042328364,0.00048130486,0.00075776584,0.00092431874,0.00004886722,0.0001456799,0.9966801],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.17952263,0.0002527985,0.0000114077975,0.00007466515,0.0009825405,0.00007188477,0.000048418857,0.000035811103,0.8189998],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969642,0.0005376639,0.0007748648,0.0005800337,0.00058393355,0.00055930426],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988233,0.00022310177,0.00030758622,0.00040304943,0.00006758708,0.00017541203],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016191325,0.00032130527,0.0006531645,0.00035470098,0.0003155394,0.00008722157,0.00030429443,0.00084008905,0.00017732216],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013387202,0.0003147024,0.00018170556,0.00012549758,0.00042800594,0.00012724627,0.000052546096,0.0007791621,0.000063385094],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0013536729,0.0005976513,0.008688161,0.00039099916,0.000152747,0.0009027795,0.21015604,0.0000040853565,0.000052656706,0.5116641,0.075353876,0.19068323],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00079193705,0.000063214975,0.0030644785,0.00029019132,0.000018623212,0.000006831025,0.00048681712,0.000020584883,0.000004493037,0.006916251,0.9879557,0.0003809057],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008339336,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10383541,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91260177,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017419364,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014053752,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999305},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W588571081","doi":"","title":"紹介 Marvin Baer, Joost Blom, Elizabeth Edinger, Nicholas Rafferty, Genevieve Saumier, Catherine Walsh, Private International Law in Common Law Canada, Cases, Text, and Materials","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"国際法外交雑誌","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Common law; Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.015955949474760332,"score_gpt":0.28266990381534635,"score_spread":0.26671395434058603,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W588571081","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96387726,0.00069795403,0.000006298546,0.0057716933,0.0014556176,0.0003575788,0.00011705115,0.000059005615,0.027657518],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9954843,0.0010689622,0.00015355049,0.0013168448,0.0005601413,0.000023997374,0.000051665163,0.000024891087,0.0013156668],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99817896,0.00014167697,0.00042070006,0.0003418323,0.0004944117,0.00042244061],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99928224,0.00009493739,0.00014447443,0.00020959173,0.00008161933,0.00018716103],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007232873,0.00020096412,0.00031987275,0.00006177558,0.00038719556,0.00020462407,0.00032269568,0.0001401181,0.00041568434],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000052862757,0.0002004096,0.000039180555,0.00016562184,0.0002532116,0.0002981715,0.00015965184,0.00016821799,0.000012655162],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026348972,0.00042395463,0.011629671,0.00009028738,0.00015078933,0.00040658016,0.007835798,0.00004542986,0.020086443,0.9419392,0.0049383175,0.0121900365],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014008292,0.00007719426,0.011961479,0.00013574392,0.00002572681,0.000028589868,0.0003402596,0.000007721602,0.0058618733,0.0039039766,0.97585326,0.00040335138],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.90925133,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97670513,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97091496,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005367268,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002787612,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8172467},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W59419847","doi":"","title":"Diffusion and Globalization Discourse","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Harvard international law journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Globalization; Metaphor; Jurisprudence; Metropolitan area; Power (physics); Movement (music); Diffusion; Sociology; Political science; Law; Aesthetics; History; Political economy; Philosophy; Linguistics; Physics","score_opus":0.008859628905455608,"score_gpt":0.2931288734744705,"score_spread":0.28426924456901487,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W59419847","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19015162,0.00006396669,0.0049349233,0.006098044,0.0019659954,0.00008051773,0.000012508501,0.00004874296,0.7966437],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99430156,0.00025383945,0.00024308563,0.00020180695,0.0017571823,0.0000013264922,0.000012377278,0.0000050183103,0.0032238315],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999131,0.00005445405,0.00016646592,0.000088920446,0.00043341002,0.00012575043],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996095,0.000021063834,0.00009911603,0.000036369605,0.00016065413,0.00007333453],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00032432735,0.000056112647,0.000057204088,0.00004440833,0.0007522027,0.0003506143,0.00011545269,0.000044914716,0.0011093732],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000027934873,0.00005151608,0.000042214313,0.00005009458,0.00014413579,0.00045672894,0.000025800999,0.00008767697,0.000040521696],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013601928,0.000041457257,0.0075464384,6.288913e-7,0.000009255478,0.000007016038,0.00034640575,0.000014792001,0.00017923578,0.98406446,0.0020911652,0.0056855436],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028136015,0.000014278942,0.019725014,0.000019634317,0.0000087576245,0.000035228,0.0003308202,0.00018731841,0.000026716378,0.01848652,0.9608148,0.00006957536],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0037379204,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0048183734,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96557796,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010048538,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000029031364,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998037},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W599857793","doi":"10.1093/law/9780199655724.001.0001","title":"Extraterritoriality and Collective Redress","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Redress; Class action; Jurisdiction; Punitive damages; Political science; Collective action; Law; Enforcement; Law and economics; Sociology; State (computer science)","score_opus":0.036957737461660665,"score_gpt":0.2543525045295619,"score_spread":0.2173947670679012,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W599857793","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00022896062,0.00012786414,0.000031853313,0.00004137354,0.0012308528,0.00040071842,0.00008735836,0.00010570568,0.99774534],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0010019868,0.0003843917,0.00003309505,0.0000142865565,0.0015334082,0.0000010757683,0.000014812393,0.000015448228,0.99700147],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987718,0.00019504355,0.00011097002,0.00029220936,0.0003198274,0.00031013633],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99919516,0.000093846145,0.00015871855,0.00019181253,0.00013296485,0.0002275176],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00032627568,0.0001831396,0.00025917505,0.000084473555,0.0008588359,0.00009548475,0.0002461431,0.00050818536,0.000042232525],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000012627712,0.00022335234,0.00009120892,0.00001520559,0.00046446142,0.0001711569,0.00015980157,0.0002971807,4.098886e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001997051,0.000029228804,0.000069682734,0.000059419122,0.00014969187,0.00002744352,0.018366192,1.4592091e-7,0.000007352651,0.9146459,0.057389256,0.009055989],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002994038,0.000028925746,0.0000891343,0.00004758163,0.00013638946,7.8564705e-7,0.0003098902,0.0000010730661,0.0000091179745,0.0010971429,0.99773854,0.00024198988],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001764683,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00080583006,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9403493,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006470615,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006893697,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.91080445},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W610995838","doi":"10.1093/law/9780192870520.001.0001","title":"Conflict of Laws Within The Uk","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Conflict of laws; Choice of law; Political science; Jurisdiction; Law; Public policy; Context (archaeology); Legislation; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.042054594835941234,"score_gpt":0.26716353225486456,"score_spread":0.22510893741892332,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W610995838","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00028877315,0.00008392704,0.00009967098,0.0000536486,0.0003649656,0.0004004835,0.00005137273,0.0000637307,0.99859345],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0027747161,0.00023925783,0.000040167593,0.000070879316,0.0002625115,3.6192506e-7,0.000011837735,0.000014380371,0.9965859],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99871236,0.00011414186,0.00019675224,0.00022596386,0.00050966087,0.00024110955],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987976,0.00017573661,0.00038864836,0.00033816698,0.0001914196,0.00010845961],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006450587,0.0001702777,0.00026519407,0.00010192296,0.0005714216,0.000037558915,0.0006605694,0.0004101011,0.000073522046],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000017012113,0.00015560599,0.00019414563,0.000025467043,0.00094963494,0.00005422309,0.00015597999,0.0003840273,7.747725e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006784342,0.000008178886,0.000018271365,0.000021448788,0.00008105701,0.000017263394,0.009114366,0.0000024643307,0.000004686573,0.9774744,0.010621136,0.0025688745],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00022711825,0.000037298676,0.000027292062,0.00006874282,0.0001253973,7.242648e-7,0.000933091,0.000003705748,0.000047309215,0.0003729449,0.99798965,0.00016672444],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035397832,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0032647236,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9873685,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019748708,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005392005,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.63454276},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W614083899","doi":"","title":"判例から見る仲裁法(31)仲裁判断の取消しと当事者自治[Noble China inc. v. Lei, 42 O.R. (3d) 69, Ontario Court of Justice, November 4, 1988 ]","year":2007,"lang":"ja","type":"article","venue":"JCAジャーナル","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"China; Economic Justice; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.01871193973247826,"score_gpt":0.29110064006933717,"score_spread":0.2723887003368589,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W614083899","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5357257,0.00062324695,0.0003675795,0.0017307526,0.004119782,0.0006046688,0.00005542031,0.000116447576,0.4566564],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90764195,0.00032270869,0.0004382109,0.0005366275,0.0021978905,0.000010518243,0.00004295471,0.000056995068,0.08875212],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99483764,0.00013948485,0.0012812741,0.0008151931,0.0015568369,0.0013695479],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971706,0.00032397974,0.00077863986,0.00074398075,0.000421411,0.000561355],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00278904,0.0005595417,0.0008515134,0.00030303432,0.0010337883,0.00020524285,0.0007543901,0.0007499272,0.0066227103],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015619803,0.00058050465,0.00034598671,0.00086278626,0.0006882681,0.00059894874,0.0002640739,0.0009236936,0.0007497371],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0022435708,0.0069636977,0.13036834,0.0014119187,0.0014963903,0.0004872864,0.4165759,0.00042395358,0.007224031,0.057921432,0.22752658,0.14735691],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011925728,0.00040112453,0.22378346,0.00017796822,0.0004851974,0.000007082242,0.00390644,0.00022231473,0.00041147255,0.00026976605,0.7684921,0.00065051595],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.37961262,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5307681,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5409655,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008846575,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011816312,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99966466},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W614308756","doi":"10.5040/9781472562425","title":"Legal Recognition of Same-Sex Partnerships","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Bloomsbury Publishing (UK) eBooks","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":111,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.07932982603025138,"score_gpt":0.28851568002178185,"score_spread":0.20918585399153047,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W614308756","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0014536385,0.0004420985,0.000044426597,0.0013714291,0.0015390925,0.00063098257,0.000119617995,0.0002938893,0.9941048],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.023927143,0.00028539865,0.00018704758,0.0007082378,0.0045445464,0.000048624537,0.0004202527,0.00008926252,0.9697895],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9956707,0.00034752762,0.0008964808,0.0007218345,0.001566952,0.0007965425],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971426,0.0003405584,0.00090962066,0.0005832553,0.0006241688,0.00039977088],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","scholarly_communication","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002901254,0.0004610342,0.0007376055,0.00052661495,0.0007145417,0.0020382407,0.0009209236,0.0013703092,0.0019291242],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007339661,0.0005199722,0.00046129283,0.00017410211,0.0006390567,0.0008814185,0.00016572917,0.0012871553,0.00006489645],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010183552,0.0000975263,0.00028176818,0.00018198538,0.00032469863,0.0001007796,0.0112881735,0.0000014390623,0.000059352347,0.1579715,0.5399969,0.289594],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004730324,0.00008820603,0.00004151792,0.00041630288,0.00019033172,0.000010800142,0.00078263425,0.0000027568158,0.000056139976,0.034167234,0.96322334,0.0005477204],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0046725706,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0062334416,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4232264,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00045420133,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00201324,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99992615},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W624539192","doi":"10.1017/cbo9781139031288","title":"Private International Law in Commonwealth Africa","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Thompson Rivers University","funders":"","keywords":"Commonwealth; Sierra leone; Tanzania; Political science; Law; Jurisdiction; Enforcement; Conflict of laws; Statute; Public administration; Sociology; Socioeconomics","score_opus":0.028602177614038965,"score_gpt":0.24441534635285966,"score_spread":0.2158131687388207,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W624539192","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00022032415,0.000052993833,0.00003271228,0.0002046643,0.0005933841,0.00042682784,0.00008137208,0.000106235784,0.9982815],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0040718466,0.00020089303,0.00003576598,0.000098245844,0.00033217788,0.0000016285854,0.000048500748,0.00001711228,0.99519384],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986453,0.00014060097,0.00017141154,0.00030928187,0.00040262975,0.00033076634],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99920326,0.00007866658,0.00018456171,0.00024223408,0.00012741689,0.0001638349],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00025897374,0.00017593389,0.0002470519,0.00016462352,0.00033245436,0.00009978531,0.00068839424,0.00034180094,0.000027007945],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000011199695,0.00022372277,0.000110845,0.000019238278,0.00040629128,0.00018134611,0.0002523127,0.00042913595,0.000031747888],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019878988,0.000015120763,0.000011237469,0.000013593401,0.000028868946,0.000043978835,0.0011577479,6.0833236e-7,0.000002090954,0.90179974,0.0960141,0.0008930334],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034560476,0.000016086615,0.000080446174,0.00009373594,0.000023551122,5.905692e-7,0.00016608882,0.000019037554,0.000004095721,0.000067321984,0.9989671,0.00021632879],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010186928,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00069020264,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.902953,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00091822597,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003427446,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99640435},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W624890805","doi":"","title":"International civil procedure","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Medical Entomology and Zoology","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Arbitration; Civil procedure; Common law; Law","score_opus":0.012521730852468356,"score_gpt":0.3096490457651945,"score_spread":0.2971273149127261,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W624890805","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.28049558,0.000310526,0.00069279847,0.026746137,0.0021881019,0.00007857845,6.595958e-7,0.00006120679,0.6894264],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9924135,0.00057242834,0.000052329473,0.0017438199,0.00017975808,0.000009057812,0.000002534211,0.000002567609,0.0050239884],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99917835,0.00018996919,0.00010457333,0.00014411066,0.00019210717,0.00019087837],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99963534,0.00011230363,0.000026746271,0.00004306068,0.000033394776,0.0001491453],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00067702285,0.00004624735,0.00008984378,0.000045213437,0.00016822152,0.000008332105,0.00010319373,0.0002658768,0.008720452],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009411705,0.000041433406,0.000019786967,0.00006045327,0.000576197,0.00003948265,0.000021930626,0.0001511952,0.000035898447],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013784412,0.000061403945,0.058409765,0.0000029244663,0.000022606317,0.00005356441,0.0029937646,7.096667e-8,0.000012207687,0.9158785,0.0011286687,0.021422775],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00044237534,0.000057477326,0.010664376,0.0000048891234,0.000008284512,0.0001287428,0.00043706264,0.000021694257,0.00001314694,0.027207313,0.96094275,0.000071896204],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00039813376,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0022648457,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9598141,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000015005518,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013951975,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9921857},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W627225013","doi":"10.82308/32239","title":"Towards a uniform conflict of laws regime in ASEAN governing international commercial transactions : uniformization of choice of law rules in contract and tort","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eScholarship@McGill (McGill)","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tort; Conflict of laws; Choice of law; Uniformization (probability theory); Law and economics; Law; Economics; Political science; Business; Mathematics; Liability","score_opus":0.030623079284877296,"score_gpt":0.29370623368739524,"score_spread":0.26308315440251795,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W627225013","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8403989,0.00004112383,0.0000026675218,0.000113565,0.00010046415,0.00024729277,0.00043400034,0.000020053792,0.15864193],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998915,0.00050692173,0.00017694703,0.000063361455,0.000020222413,0.000009749047,0.000026296253,0.00001470989,0.00026674793],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981355,0.0002039911,0.00069038937,0.00022703916,0.00050688296,0.00023620088],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990639,0.00021208948,0.00029677575,0.00014663908,0.00018535693,0.00009523226],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010771559,0.00014698779,0.00035880096,0.000190637,0.00023171834,0.000019230001,0.00023237281,0.00019562045,0.0005187519],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016256238,0.00016570243,0.000094016126,0.00034020605,0.0002770823,0.0008609515,0.000019416284,0.00029119075,0.0000023742055],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004715722,0.0005976764,0.008966307,0.00008559553,0.00008921057,0.0000073553133,0.0011907606,0.0004550215,0.0044348836,0.54676986,5.295818e-7,0.43693122],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0071206335,0.0004778982,0.3695465,0.0008498704,0.00013328322,0.000009686812,0.0016429694,0.0009250849,0.018569237,0.0058819475,0.59403706,0.00080580765],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06192124,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07934513,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5940365,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026352375,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000640879,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9443255},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W62748862","doi":"","title":"Making Long-Distance Parents Pay Up: International child-support enforcement","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Enforcement; Political science; Law; Public administration","score_opus":0.03609533812147204,"score_gpt":0.34968942484932736,"score_spread":0.3135940867278553,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W62748862","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011736459,0.000012422005,0.0219091,0.010340374,0.0027906855,0.00016644139,0.000010083248,0.00013251741,0.9529019],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9325841,0.00008341363,0.000045901168,0.00038655903,0.00042156092,0.000008572915,0.000003214069,0.0000044127746,0.066462286],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99906266,0.000022484586,0.00015270694,0.0001541065,0.0004105692,0.00019745804],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996966,0.000017669876,0.000065331464,0.00009510252,0.000064288295,0.000060974813],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00025733176,0.00006169069,0.00005989539,0.0000331815,0.00024853938,0.00006226998,0.0001943356,0.00003819868,0.011361563],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000032327687,0.000036706482,0.000046878213,0.00005679619,0.00007091107,0.00024487087,0.000040961968,0.00003534337,0.00019903318],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032365948,0.00007074899,0.13323347,0.0000038618514,0.00005536134,0.000007634534,0.007316198,0.000001698472,0.000044453038,0.5031639,0.007475703,0.34859464],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002512003,0.000015372572,0.02429171,0.000032994278,0.0000036785623,6.785449e-7,0.00043108105,0.000008277909,0.00004184714,0.00034632356,0.9744914,0.00008542108],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00043900128,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018936356,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9670157,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012538525,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004768959,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9895422},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W629202107","doi":"","title":"Party autonomy in contractual and non-contractual obligations : a European and Anglo-Common Law perspective on the freedom of choice of law in the Rome I regulation on the law applicable to contractual obligations and the Rome II regulation on the law applicable to non-contractual obligations","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Choice of law; Law; Private law; Autonomy; Political science; Public law; Common law; Comparative law; Municipal law; Conflict of laws; Civil law (Civil law); Perspective (graphical)","score_opus":0.018843790704817998,"score_gpt":0.2737858430248974,"score_spread":0.2549420523200794,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W629202107","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.27239937,0.00006761598,0.00027191377,0.050908975,0.00014806447,0.011247248,0.00027526135,0.00007716465,0.66460437],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98672193,0.000023557917,0.00003965599,0.0062261717,0.0005757912,0.0009818277,0.00007718992,0.000070677466,0.005283189],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9939122,0.0016174362,0.0014294514,0.0010326887,0.0012918252,0.00071640546],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.984476,0.012521255,0.0009592527,0.0012926909,0.00051649986,0.00023434249],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0069287736,0.0007229373,0.001079502,0.0002689508,0.0033308147,0.00069845293,0.0009994556,0.0004473453,0.00013813809],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005060418,0.00039696475,0.0002274975,0.00074192317,0.0030639712,0.00056938693,0.0002291984,0.0013147885,0.000023453393],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00032038527,0.00036707567,0.00005463954,0.000010518909,0.00011617727,0.0000010527094,0.058130912,0.0006331295,0.00021326229,0.93847644,0.0013142758,0.000362119],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01270249,0.003997124,0.1750508,0.0014969762,0.0011502645,0.00001834822,0.07908789,0.006391424,0.00085489696,0.265784,0.45086315,0.0026026238],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.044549234,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16886547,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.71432257,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00046521332,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00032420218,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99984825},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W636401370","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511609855","title":"The confluence of public and private international law: justice, pluralism and subsidiarity in the international constitutional ordering of private law","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Private law; Public law; Municipal law; Law; Comparative law; Political science; Subsidiarity; International law; Conflict of laws; Jurisdiction; Public international law; Commercial law; Economics; European union","score_opus":0.0317691857291862,"score_gpt":0.30128467673162795,"score_spread":0.26951549100244176,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W636401370","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010219908,0.0003849291,0.00012384586,0.009231418,0.00046554516,0.0003409423,0.000062195206,0.000017447082,0.97915375],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9731922,0.0035172638,0.00020749887,0.0010263385,0.00034685206,0.000012961538,0.000062055675,0.0000071537206,0.021627659],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99838674,0.00010228528,0.00042298666,0.00021054567,0.00070801616,0.00016943506],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998704,0.00053484546,0.00030391174,0.00013859766,0.00027002167,0.000048590373],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014990293,0.00013441479,0.00019238371,0.000076519325,0.0003756975,0.00022316515,0.0005775059,0.00015968014,0.00008047381],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020784496,0.00009294526,0.000048985494,0.00006984656,0.0035027883,0.00030687323,0.00013625847,0.00026482006,6.9655243e-7],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000133110325,0.0000211556,0.0006495837,0.000012738814,0.000037395926,0.0000019508375,0.0013180339,0.0000021381866,0.000029018174,0.99628395,0.00023137228,0.001399381],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032524872,0.000020246383,0.0033715356,0.00009133661,0.000029475554,0.000006663343,0.00027647303,0.000056675144,0.000021876334,0.053534336,0.94215006,0.00011606709],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015668604,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008868005,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9629723,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000085870895,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00028770903,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992091},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W657487758","doi":"","title":"Reform and development of private international law : essays in honour of Sir Peter North","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Conflict of laws; Law; Comity; Choice of law; Jurisdiction; Political science; Private law; Convention; International law; Municipal law; Comparative law; Common law","score_opus":0.026227633712212695,"score_gpt":0.26659155891765457,"score_spread":0.24036392520544186,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W657487758","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010375317,0.000044280692,0.00002357464,0.00010716508,0.00012667786,0.0001173185,0.000007914869,0.00000991227,0.98918784],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.21862645,0.0006023877,0.0015836074,0.000069667876,0.00016387661,0.000007790474,0.000043651795,0.000013519639,0.77888906],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990991,0.00001563981,0.00033128262,0.00012933936,0.00032319527,0.00010145316],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996189,0.00002230558,0.00018025574,0.00006326527,0.000079397745,0.00003588775],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00026180744,0.00008485733,0.00017997916,0.00009899618,0.00006194563,0.000012756846,0.0001439123,0.00011614417,0.0004557384],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000007277727,0.00007539576,0.000031087613,0.000035158442,0.00013926715,0.00008771005,0.00006725135,0.00010742296,0.0000046674263],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041888274,0.00017551078,0.0060273623,0.00015383074,0.00015468455,0.000008394715,0.05625469,0.0000019407182,0.000020580015,0.8343353,0.0010511266,0.10177467],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020151911,0.000017080873,0.007815379,0.00010744096,0.0000049176524,3.9756532e-7,0.00020039055,0.000004761076,0.000037644615,0.0009985755,0.99049884,0.00011306468],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000956149,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.036614288,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9894477,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026142097,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00018987153,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.980965},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6899564154","doi":"10.58079/tm9e","title":"Présentation - Legal Recognition of Non-Conjugal Families: New Frontiers in Family Law in the US, Canada and Europe (20.05.2021, en ligne)","year":2021,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Industrias Culturais (Universidade de Coimbra)","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Family law; Legislation; Work (physics); Government (linguistics); Feature (linguistics)","score_opus":0.01962246327885084,"score_gpt":0.24304890453850933,"score_spread":0.2234264412596585,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6899564154","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8943428,0.0011734343,0.000080054655,0.045137387,0.0024448277,0.00046654057,0.00016569543,0.000012129924,0.05617717],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9746324,0.0025741472,0.00033955366,0.001643465,0.00097581674,0.0000064374804,0.0002237914,0.000022871523,0.019581545],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99748784,0.0008263552,0.0003712521,0.0003874283,0.00049088616,0.00043621438],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99903333,0.00021419353,0.00021624829,0.00016178304,0.00020225282,0.00017216573],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005323188,0.00022109433,0.000338203,0.00014199199,0.000250512,0.00015602469,0.00026889532,0.00034623884,0.00017141763],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016281081,0.00023069112,0.0000651738,0.0018238145,0.0002732562,0.00088849256,0.00006325736,0.0006196496,0.0000053374474],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004272048,0.0005792798,0.027453825,0.0001839057,0.00035737432,0.0024471958,0.1351923,0.00048088623,0.010903054,0.025517914,0.5621343,0.23432274],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0021544178,0.00011812061,0.25500238,0.00033566402,0.00012271405,0.000032567958,0.13023937,0.00022276133,0.00060691155,0.00015239214,0.6106583,0.0003543704],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9344128,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.933897,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23396838,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00059816364,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023060772,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9407311},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6903731061","doi":"10.13140/rg.2.2.11533.05602","title":"Judicial Insights into Parenting Orders Under Recent Amendments to the Canadian Divorce Act","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Government (linguistics); Legislature; Work (physics)","score_opus":0.03536357579227641,"score_gpt":0.3208382454383051,"score_spread":0.2854746696460287,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6903731061","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.34110722,0.00014568902,0.00038332268,0.14045355,0.001959128,0.00031732905,0.0000012823814,0.00007133053,0.51556116],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9906556,0.00014545074,0.000063170155,0.005654576,0.0003353958,0.000008225514,0.0000057050465,0.000005686033,0.0031262003],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99895287,0.000111683454,0.00012028644,0.00018024934,0.0003379579,0.00029695153],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994045,0.000036429665,0.000027500497,0.00012989133,0.00014242773,0.0002592708],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00024706038,0.00006622002,0.00007136065,0.000047688773,0.0017285676,0.00022143203,0.0001519777,0.000055644166,0.0013657023],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000100752295,0.000051605755,0.0000330209,0.00046197415,0.000056121942,0.00009662776,0.00004771107,0.000088415414,0.00010387427],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024286954,0.00015350146,0.0109181665,0.000008432918,0.00018350195,0.00004540239,0.2578614,0.00047864238,0.0008749621,0.40084472,0.056189913,0.27241707],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000686894,0.000009012521,0.0038371498,0.000007413323,0.000007932135,1.14176004e-7,0.009191521,0.000019169982,0.00014209219,0.0011511361,0.9854821,0.000083653176],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.80585736,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9973178,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9292922,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00037906526,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00092017604,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999571},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6949653008","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.15418631","title":"The influence of civil law on the evolution of the modern and contemporary Canadian constitution and institutions","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Civil law (Civil law); Constitution; Relation (database); Comparative law; Public law; Common law; Constitutional law; Legal history","score_opus":0.03727077056225938,"score_gpt":0.2541252990419243,"score_spread":0.21685452847966494,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6949653008","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0024711038,0.00043753933,0.000047153382,0.0037549592,0.00009007809,0.00060450955,0.0002769467,0.000045515164,0.9922722],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9743268,0.00035609285,0.000001233293,0.00013423417,0.000047176665,8.737288e-8,0.000049498794,0.00005994755,0.025024964],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99877924,0.00035649122,0.00020745356,0.0001786951,0.00032388844,0.00015423496],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998847,0.000113021255,0.0001690979,0.00029450303,0.00049407914,0.00008229991],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00094252214,0.00009113633,0.00010849718,0.000097251504,0.006178659,0.00023448533,0.00053994067,0.00010774649,0.00012050111],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005985898,0.00006067259,0.000036991303,0.00021922546,0.0027219893,0.000121963865,0.00031028455,0.00026992479,0.000019210012],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000133118965,0.000008451286,0.0000050803696,0.00002435942,0.000023768678,3.706765e-7,0.0018139485,0.000037846727,0.0000384735,0.96840453,0.027022202,0.002607659],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010012907,0.000037400485,0.0005734968,0.00017902478,0.000017525972,0.000002636244,0.0003637601,0.000033262117,0.0000056545814,0.007878005,0.99075013,0.000058968722],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.029416906,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015128044,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97185564,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00037341338,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00034500821,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999992},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6980444723","doi":"","title":"The Case for a Canadian Nondelegation Doctrine","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"","score_opus":0.014994849434603115,"score_gpt":0.27967804805574065,"score_spread":0.26468319862113754,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6980444723","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.66437477,0.0002712664,0.00007923535,0.016947893,0.0017670462,0.0013742357,0.00003861961,0.00009885649,0.31504807],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98143375,0.00003414261,0.00008591086,0.0006720654,0.0005248754,0.00004783685,0.0000073733004,0.00000841579,0.017185617],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99915856,0.000059180173,0.00013468068,0.00015377712,0.00014729278,0.00034648908],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99921197,0.0001588931,0.00004933854,0.0001927574,0.00012216519,0.0002648688],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00072795094,0.0000677079,0.00007665746,0.00003087315,0.001569806,0.00024240045,0.0001497103,0.00007649875,0.00042161962],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000101472666,0.000055217562,0.000063265,0.00014594579,0.00007579242,0.0002318174,0.000011311444,0.00010039835,0.00026924396],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001991554,0.000009359365,0.0012159497,0.0000063101847,0.000015514572,0.000026178246,0.0012985049,0.000009496835,0.000060620503,0.9794246,0.0055081234,0.012405425],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026393033,0.00003579384,0.00034894317,0.000005660956,0.0000080986,0.000010016217,0.00088704616,0.00012603098,0.00003878817,0.0023367,0.99585295,0.000086016276],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7468296,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9759805,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9903448,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019335627,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00035036483,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99973},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6983275006","doi":"","title":"The Malta Papers:Comparative Experiences On Mixity In Public And Private Law","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research Publications (Maastricht University)","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Law Foundation of Nova Scotia","funders":"","keywords":"Private law; Conflict of laws; Comparative law; Jurisdiction; Public law; Civil law (Civil law); Foundation (evidence); Acknowledgement; Commercial law; Black letter law","score_opus":0.1572143087209409,"score_gpt":0.39585091013450163,"score_spread":0.23863660141356074,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6983275006","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23947567,0.00033491154,0.000030859268,0.041730672,0.0001014667,0.00043418055,0.0000066055536,0.0001360336,0.7177496],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97852045,0.00084195554,0.000024611023,0.00002149474,0.000072399154,0.000019214298,0.0000036296155,0.0000037755442,0.02049245],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99794877,0.0006173106,0.00010658255,0.00031264356,0.0005723487,0.00044236297],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99826646,0.0010712685,0.000023749977,0.0002181913,0.00022514918,0.00019517318],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017561595,0.00007087255,0.00007750514,0.00075646525,0.002379397,0.0009985277,0.0005017939,0.0000696098,0.00011970684],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00025286886,0.000059132406,0.000032663924,0.004162535,0.0011892369,0.0008095981,0.0001503323,0.0003825558,0.000035529734],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000085555985,0.000041925145,0.0004977652,0.0000025379925,0.000011524832,0.0000040724526,0.0107557,5.718588e-7,0.00002232755,0.9810683,0.0013507087,0.0062359814],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008480402,0.000044663728,0.00392246,0.000013070268,0.000002077367,4.012036e-7,0.03489545,0.00010049737,0.000011913441,0.0009997515,0.95986325,0.000061685016],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0012324029,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004643325,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98006856,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00031645052,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00043981252,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99891937},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6987380912","doi":"","title":"Structures of Judgment: How the Modern\\nSupreme Court of Canada Organizes its Reasons","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Supreme court; Style (visual arts); Court decision; Precedent; High Court","score_opus":0.016276143004333964,"score_gpt":0.24881429909498048,"score_spread":0.23253815609064651,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6987380912","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8830806,0.0013204443,0.000051344414,0.026969615,0.000534146,0.0004386009,0.00008678117,0.000060613416,0.087457865],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9959134,0.00010754785,0.00007218858,0.00050061895,0.0002105065,0.0000022677864,0.000003107608,0.0000074871496,0.0031828634],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99863386,0.0001077942,0.00018541256,0.00015850618,0.00064308755,0.0002713314],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99913436,0.00009585402,0.00016686771,0.0002503503,0.00021283556,0.00013974513],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00033178402,0.00010629358,0.00019145539,0.000020563379,0.00041594423,0.000054335247,0.00035824694,0.000077433724,0.00024147797],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00022362941,0.00008189477,0.00005777386,0.00020872078,0.00014390361,0.00016078954,0.0000266786,0.00014238988,0.0000015012691],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000051593397,0.00011849543,0.0031627691,0.000041344505,0.00013392958,0.000010420286,0.011778698,0.00020124277,0.017001249,0.88925254,0.072996065,0.005251638],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00089049264,0.00021557724,0.065990664,0.00010601149,0.00012227854,0.0000051871957,0.004314476,0.00015855579,0.029747583,0.033293713,0.86477816,0.00037728687],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.31893942,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.69029146,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8559588,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009318571,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005682478,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6855958},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6988008665","doi":"","title":"Whiting v. Krassner","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"","score_opus":0.01952518278292006,"score_gpt":0.32055299764817835,"score_spread":0.3010278148652583,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6988008665","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14829043,0.000012163229,0.0009934419,0.006467113,0.00013910003,0.000032538755,1.16875874e-7,0.00009615872,0.8439689],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99139524,0.000013679159,0.00041155913,0.0003168609,0.00024762453,0.0000012961922,2.515219e-7,0.0000018619053,0.0076116477],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999678,0.000010052485,0.00004345194,0.000052255404,0.00011232357,0.00010392557],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998825,0.000009640754,0.000010969937,0.00003509004,0.00002163787,0.0000401483],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00016593978,0.000020080512,0.00002570755,0.000013569206,0.00024833722,0.000034607154,0.000041058214,0.00002403627,0.0006512091],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000024792635,0.000018012946,0.000018641,0.00007341743,0.000036365036,0.00009004078,0.00000675076,0.000026169353,0.0001172788],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[9.148802e-7,0.000015548974,0.0016252007,6.3910807e-7,0.000002588323,0.0000015629855,0.009283066,0.00001354709,0.00021976155,0.9653998,0.0004183571,0.023018997],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001602798,0.000010477324,0.0045942734,0.000005045082,0.0000024255964,3.0749342e-7,0.0032410966,0.0000023385542,0.000311369,0.00916824,0.98244095,0.00006321997],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005528219,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0043435628,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9820226,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000035286197,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000048976486,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.83570504},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6989768757","doi":"","title":"Charleston School of Law, National Moot Court Competition: Team Quarter Finalist","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Quarter (Canadian coin); Government (linguistics); Work (physics)","score_opus":0.033511784490963994,"score_gpt":0.32532123869156093,"score_spread":0.29180945420059695,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6989768757","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.046162147,0.00006009983,0.00024489374,0.0037416185,0.00033635926,0.000103347134,0.000010454785,0.000049948372,0.9492911],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9939498,0.000018610956,0.0001778937,0.00047468237,0.0007784573,0.000007133307,0.00001049918,0.0000033124527,0.004579647],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991198,0.00005277503,0.00014146777,0.00007179736,0.00045117858,0.00016298844],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995406,0.000043713237,0.00005855634,0.000061321916,0.00018074889,0.00011503742],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00055086194,0.00005033583,0.00008079707,0.000032474385,0.00023939474,0.000027841576,0.00007888959,0.000055976925,0.0057135844],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002962708,0.000047652095,0.000047663114,0.00007595083,0.00016253536,0.0003328683,0.000010836149,0.000057359608,0.00023987905],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006157443,0.000102554644,0.008682392,0.0000042635484,0.0000069161492,6.7065145e-8,0.002158541,8.8798095e-7,0.00015865071,0.97118,0.017553814,0.00014572982],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017623037,0.000028672392,0.036344822,0.000011664425,0.0000069756697,9.357805e-7,0.0010863759,0.000016384824,0.00018005677,0.001398277,0.9606662,0.00008345333],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002831499,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0011553548,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96978176,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000068643065,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008147555,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9951953},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6989843473","doi":"","title":"Canadian Media Guild v Canadian Broadcasting Corp","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Broadcasting (networking); Guild; Trade union; European union","score_opus":0.027340919919937447,"score_gpt":0.2599260879013641,"score_spread":0.23258516798142667,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6989843473","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3319238,0.0004508222,0.0000067997,0.008162364,0.0015662557,0.00025500832,0.00006382695,0.00014402879,0.6574271],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98872054,0.00013116277,0.00021399246,0.002792258,0.0013605194,0.000012224632,0.000023857012,0.000022338836,0.0067230826],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980156,0.00010982207,0.00023827131,0.00029743044,0.0004238011,0.0009150857],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99713534,0.00008949978,0.00006443599,0.00027023818,0.00015537065,0.0022851124],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00049939216,0.0001511209,0.00017911632,0.00017162696,0.0026269916,0.00013909029,0.00037386836,0.00020341361,0.0030196642],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00039321787,0.00017305989,0.00008239074,0.0004039603,0.00027553274,0.00032506013,0.000021835287,0.00030041294,0.00085238414],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002762035,0.00007589653,0.25129727,0.000022977174,0.000117349424,0.0015104363,0.0624798,0.00007131518,0.00020340315,0.46010897,0.19260472,0.03148023],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017145502,0.000014098082,0.020531366,0.000020110727,0.000008802857,0.000013817587,0.00076614966,0.0000185052,0.000019585023,0.0004251699,0.9777862,0.00022475176],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9989129,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9998798,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.78518146,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010394572,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003369368,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99992555},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6991315305","doi":"","title":"Forum Selection Clauses before Canadian Courts: A Tale of Two (or Three) Solitudes","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Selection (genetic algorithm); Government (linguistics); Agency (philosophy); Jury selection","score_opus":0.016067963328931935,"score_gpt":0.28448325833944926,"score_spread":0.2684152950105173,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6991315305","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90639824,0.00021414619,0.00015354477,0.006537975,0.0006621258,0.00085318077,0.000034083554,0.00017462698,0.08497209],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9944384,0.000032276,0.00031613905,0.0007189723,0.00046218542,0.00005753568,0.000008160693,0.000017336619,0.003948955],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985277,0.00007024396,0.0002653974,0.00022877584,0.00035432455,0.00055354636],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99895483,0.000047797195,0.00011440829,0.00017819376,0.00025416614,0.00045057407],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00031517123,0.0001329526,0.00019956626,0.00009609473,0.0007660451,0.00017607551,0.00022530841,0.00013952274,0.003803321],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009132527,0.00011912344,0.000089703964,0.0002669126,0.00025577008,0.00064528384,0.000026736532,0.00017091748,0.0002149412],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000045466248,0.00016781887,0.24639417,0.00005104186,0.00014289013,0.000008907819,0.0065845763,0.0000468521,0.0013017731,0.7001932,0.025717815,0.019345436],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007198342,0.00029651224,0.046144243,0.000091721326,0.000047423935,0.0000057960997,0.0026206789,0.0001932267,0.00071521406,0.024604274,0.9241988,0.00036228943],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9230683,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9941558,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89848095,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026366004,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00064915465,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9971073},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6996003542","doi":"","title":"Private International Law in Common Law Canada: Cases, Text and Materials, 3rd ed.","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Common law; Private law; Public law; Conflict of laws; Comparative law; Municipal law; Civil law (Civil law)","score_opus":0.010842185037731792,"score_gpt":0.2734022041468452,"score_spread":0.2625600191091134,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6996003542","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.81335807,0.000009643616,0.0000013463698,0.00421815,0.00097595266,0.00007369023,0.0000143730595,0.000018969457,0.18132979],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99754703,0.000034674293,0.00007014848,0.0008209845,0.00023391264,0.0000039574693,0.000008767639,0.0000036128272,0.0012769051],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99943405,0.000031475844,0.00012470197,0.00010329882,0.00017429466,0.00013217042],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997664,0.00004750713,0.000030742427,0.000066131885,0.000024991854,0.00006419137],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00025747492,0.00004955563,0.00007743438,0.000016161652,0.00017599322,0.000099027595,0.00010382848,0.00005410752,0.0010663986],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000013267836,0.000046322395,0.0000075421644,0.000036163357,0.00013554796,0.0001406457,0.000040472656,0.000080347745,0.000004833141],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007047703,0.000012964745,0.0032415967,0.0000013793874,0.0000030970084,0.000014114082,0.0003573827,9.4832416e-8,0.0015384589,0.99260116,0.0009830726,0.0012396452],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015707537,0.0000071834756,0.014563169,0.000005012087,0.000001977957,0.000004591417,0.00018727226,0.0000055955784,0.0011364514,0.0018744313,0.98197955,0.00007769719],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9851365,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.999211,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9907267,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005616438,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00009307886,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99984676},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6996342734","doi":"","title":"Safety Valves: A Band-Aid Solution to the Ills of Mandatory Minimums?","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Safety valve; Statutory law; Work (physics); Discretion; Supreme court; Work safety","score_opus":0.016434526667478327,"score_gpt":0.27601037551575,"score_spread":0.2595758488482717,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6996342734","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6318428,0.0013001479,0.00068078854,0.03260701,0.0033801605,0.0015551759,0.00026089733,0.00024943386,0.3281236],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99173033,0.00006840214,0.00011447749,0.0014789609,0.00046256607,0.00006204319,0.000011399205,0.000011725073,0.0060600857],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981757,0.00036752064,0.00027464094,0.00022942292,0.0006524666,0.00030025924],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992278,0.00011526689,0.00011685316,0.00030288796,0.00007679379,0.00016035514],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015749165,0.00009584434,0.00015708066,0.000048973805,0.0017026543,0.00005435265,0.00040726384,0.000051391915,0.002873743],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000102132326,0.00008335787,0.00013365324,0.0003622949,0.00016713908,0.00017138217,0.00014305541,0.0002180726,0.00011218515],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007375797,0.00059987645,0.0074204127,0.00005623997,0.00022312517,0.000016254999,0.07764641,0.000991359,0.0071680197,0.7415176,0.12887745,0.034745704],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029648477,0.000106875545,0.003606796,0.000011906202,0.000020291525,0.0000010777712,0.0028406486,0.000015428453,0.00023211027,0.000722834,0.9920316,0.00011396822],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008218881,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010766899,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8631541,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00020065595,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002199567,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999597},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6999111685","doi":"","title":"CAW-Canada, Local 1015 v Scotsburn Dairy Group","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Pension; Jurisdiction; Liability; Grievance; Pension fund; Collective bargaining","score_opus":0.01827540020680759,"score_gpt":0.25421552490691396,"score_spread":0.23594012470010636,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6999111685","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5676987,0.0011449006,0.0008655215,0.0060567204,0.0023682977,0.00042584038,0.000027408176,0.0003270485,0.42108554],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.987073,0.00016209426,0.00012778435,0.0019486814,0.0010867915,0.000014909671,0.000011292002,0.000019558658,0.009555888],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99792165,0.00014828428,0.00026710948,0.00032615403,0.00079919246,0.00053760794],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989583,0.00007758354,0.00008288106,0.00029402057,0.00010578379,0.00048141705],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004168305,0.00015928697,0.00021342345,0.0000373414,0.0013733986,0.00006921972,0.0003337378,0.00014640467,0.0014966936],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007156626,0.00016570526,0.00009232169,0.00028331482,0.0006392235,0.00037157213,0.00005954135,0.0002948057,0.00034582888],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000113652466,0.00032013506,0.022405151,0.000031961405,0.00011111478,0.00066167256,0.008528898,0.00008465505,0.0005204129,0.7184183,0.23471946,0.01408458],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034408312,0.000045605968,0.010257323,0.000021083919,0.00001159264,0.000011751963,0.0010521146,0.000019344361,0.00013938911,0.0006132946,0.9872501,0.00023432114],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.87291014,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.95755374,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.75253063,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00038543734,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008426334,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999267},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6999389560","doi":"","title":"Compensation for Extraordinary Rendition: A\\nComparative Study and the Need for a Domestic Cause of\\nAction in the United States","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarly Commons (University of the Pacific)","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Compensation (psychology); Legislation; Government (linguistics); State (computer science)","score_opus":0.0430371593938651,"score_gpt":0.29551883480554914,"score_spread":0.25248167541168404,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6999389560","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98369366,0.000017539323,0.0035163353,0.009914146,0.000101311794,0.0013668032,0.000035255136,0.000011435957,0.0013435191],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99967027,0.000018631596,0.00008999419,0.000021510896,0.000023756927,0.000005643573,0.000017240358,0.0000028340964,0.00015010154],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99855554,0.0009337861,0.00011146133,0.00010413724,0.00019423278,0.00010082775],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99804765,0.0013471859,0.00018947248,0.00020186667,0.00019180657,0.000021998103],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020920408,0.00006248928,0.0001490708,0.00011103624,0.0012829147,0.00007732791,0.0002993276,0.000041533443,0.000006515943],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015126367,0.000042755633,0.00007307767,0.00043442196,0.00047258637,0.00041389046,0.000038847313,0.00014149024,3.4784608e-7],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0026359304,0.0007922727,0.056499615,0.000052412463,0.00023260011,0.0000010820917,0.7163854,0.00044334846,0.0002071536,0.21644785,0.0020398444,0.0042624883],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004489814,0.00048066795,0.27256507,0.000044691013,0.00024529535,0.0000016466934,0.6776271,0.0063024196,0.000008247146,0.0152604645,0.022855021,0.000119560915],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0059561846,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011570241,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21606545,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000043289285,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000030941686,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9867272},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7005345869","doi":"","title":"Regulation of Contracts in Canadian Private International Law","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Conflict of laws; Work (physics); Private law; Legislation","score_opus":0.012380739075759456,"score_gpt":0.2688447677873889,"score_spread":0.25646402871162943,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7005345869","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.44016412,0.000025052463,0.0000405683,0.0036771637,0.0005829895,0.0001514505,0.000007650461,0.000027626102,0.55532336],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976895,0.000013503161,0.00013678802,0.0006154133,0.00031130336,0.000005366566,0.000012452754,0.00000579078,0.0012099114],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990703,0.000097826334,0.00020404693,0.00013097964,0.00026207097,0.00023476726],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994421,0.000056166864,0.000082527724,0.000119639866,0.00008800891,0.00021155484],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007886812,0.000058142126,0.000104363695,0.00007019864,0.00016561482,0.000059853937,0.00017091479,0.00009143938,0.0005493419],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016739743,0.00006430951,0.00003461709,0.00011967696,0.00013287575,0.0003056134,0.000013391754,0.00009831723,0.000049128947],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007890827,0.0000141376595,0.013713177,0.0000019603988,0.0000050109934,7.5860345e-7,0.00062452554,0.000031237352,0.00057631667,0.98324406,0.00011130031,0.0016696301],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029283485,0.000014804746,0.110094756,0.000027607914,0.000003150295,2.6811537e-7,0.000056083074,0.00016916117,0.0003305835,0.010844137,0.87809145,0.00007514084],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.82661957,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.974394,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9723999,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00019465297,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00013197557,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6014909},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7008246214","doi":"","title":"Bindend karakter van onderlinge akkoorden (“mutual agreements”) en de status ervan in het intern recht – Sifto Canada Corp / Her Majesty the Queen (Canada)","year":2018,"lang":"nl","type":"article","venue":"Lirias (KU Leuven)","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Majesty; Queen (butterfly); Population; White (mutation)","score_opus":0.015546057782817315,"score_gpt":0.2725804836666124,"score_spread":0.2570344258837951,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7008246214","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9122683,0.000381338,0.000058147263,0.025320208,0.0055020163,0.0008679906,0.00024637472,0.00005891121,0.05529673],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96230996,0.0001905738,0.000050997867,0.0039260136,0.0022204653,0.00002951572,0.00003349824,0.000056106343,0.031182889],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9943589,0.0010346816,0.00080827513,0.0007361979,0.0014977332,0.001564231],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977268,0.0004702467,0.0004006457,0.00067367085,0.00021733566,0.00051133207],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015194793,0.0004844499,0.00051027426,0.000118059215,0.00080666767,0.00029104936,0.0009917379,0.00036883523,0.0037704608],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00030013476,0.00042350465,0.00013471181,0.0006171338,0.0004541341,0.00033872275,0.00031617662,0.0008431474,0.00015889335],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010358662,0.00063872436,0.3533209,0.00013754494,0.0010964834,0.0007296196,0.17568202,0.00014459112,0.00025479827,0.004601814,0.31925732,0.14310029],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00092734915,0.00025309125,0.0690781,0.00015072746,0.00008853052,0.0000047312956,0.0136896325,0.00040971476,0.00009030138,0.00045294812,0.9143194,0.0005354515],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99778295,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99987453,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5950621,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003190985,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006922278,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99982166},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7008316119","doi":"","title":"Canada-United States Law Institute annual conference: the management and resolution of cross border disputes as Canada and the U.S. enter the 21st century, April 14-16, 2000 (tape 1 of 2)","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Diplomacy; Settlement (finance); Commission; Dispute resolution; Joint (building); Resolution (logic); European commission","score_opus":0.007415871277765849,"score_gpt":0.2601785605129353,"score_spread":0.2527626892351695,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7008316119","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.87035584,0.0019286773,0.000004948813,0.014430662,0.0003963112,0.00071265706,0.00030249986,0.000017334522,0.11185106],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98917353,0.0034794684,0.000008286116,0.0024244317,0.000084543695,0.000019410654,0.000030286494,0.0000068781646,0.0047731474],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984267,0.00022362861,0.0002919747,0.00019218675,0.00057991955,0.0002856026],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991616,0.00014311097,0.00013063231,0.00025882537,0.00019811904,0.00010768792],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00058854197,0.00013426963,0.00017702409,0.000017319451,0.0010597897,0.0001645951,0.00027942614,0.000052137457,0.0005121349],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000027742924,0.00007598793,0.000032723485,0.000217257,0.0018718321,0.0002322138,0.00008315279,0.00017377482,0.0000010716196],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00038823253,0.000061501094,0.0030644508,0.00006453294,0.00025703677,0.000007907885,0.017758315,0.0003060158,0.000004233418,0.9546148,0.010091091,0.013381891],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006816848,0.000021426744,0.011154855,0.000036055804,0.00004406554,0.0000017767697,0.006776407,0.00006113911,0.000020435866,0.0007295312,0.98037595,0.00009665828],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99865466,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9993356,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9702849,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013465078,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006169295,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8151153},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7008473100","doi":"","title":"Canada-United States Law Institute annual conference: the management and resolution of cross border disputes as Canada and the U.S. enter the 21st century, April 14-16, 2000 (tape 2 of 2)","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Resolution (logic); State (computer science); Legislation; Dispute resolution","score_opus":0.007215303367252644,"score_gpt":0.25976057872621555,"score_spread":0.25254527535896293,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7008473100","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8682824,0.0019562256,0.000004857858,0.014371611,0.00039847463,0.0007118202,0.00029673072,0.000017337412,0.11396057],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98907554,0.0035603628,0.000008130029,0.0024254005,0.00008566444,0.000019092486,0.000030409223,0.000006872193,0.004788499],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998427,0.00022356317,0.00029208962,0.0001920617,0.0005797948,0.0002855117],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99916404,0.00014134531,0.00013079094,0.00025839073,0.0001977339,0.00010767359],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005857413,0.00013423241,0.00017706188,0.000017309565,0.0010598573,0.00016490647,0.00027929057,0.00005213772,0.0005037157],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002745076,0.00007596628,0.000032717966,0.00021710977,0.0018718095,0.00023235251,0.00008314259,0.00017373996,0.000001061645],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003820373,0.000060791113,0.0029460574,0.00006430999,0.00025414384,0.000008005056,0.0175712,0.0003038365,0.000004059093,0.955021,0.0098325545,0.01355197],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00068593083,0.000021435528,0.011002509,0.000035677058,0.00004393796,0.0000017806751,0.0067181657,0.000060798684,0.000020330357,0.0007347816,0.9805781,0.00009650681],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99866635,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.999339,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97074556,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00013468441,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00061453664,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8151673},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7010426284","doi":"","title":"Intangible Justice? Intellectual Property Disputes and Canadian Small Claims Courts","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Intellectual property; Nova scotia; Jurisdiction; Competence (human resources); Economic Justice; Dispute resolution","score_opus":0.024583054766330888,"score_gpt":0.2580312812363469,"score_spread":0.233448226470016,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7010426284","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7289619,0.00104298,0.00006789063,0.014355676,0.0019267817,0.00074934954,0.00007932907,0.00022664499,0.25258946],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98120916,0.00015325459,0.00013145882,0.001857435,0.00044794063,0.000057746598,0.000016701224,0.00001781462,0.016108494],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99855465,0.00019285506,0.00017343255,0.00028935258,0.0003234934,0.00046623847],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990446,0.00012720579,0.000046094712,0.00016865524,0.000066982946,0.00054646935],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006695389,0.00012009955,0.00014724617,0.00009185057,0.0025791624,0.00021305459,0.00025857706,0.00007083084,0.003830958],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00017158374,0.00010446133,0.000048277867,0.00025543274,0.00023161975,0.00018107473,0.00012705137,0.00034352232,0.000079967416],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018040322,0.00030427385,0.014852996,0.00010582583,0.00017151826,0.00021275479,0.103138074,0.00014945172,0.00064723147,0.67810845,0.13473782,0.06739121],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018862511,0.00009946795,0.00067302835,0.00001011881,0.000035630335,0.0000074049353,0.005353865,0.00013073167,0.000030307887,0.001126048,0.99216074,0.00018403365],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.61404234,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.84680444,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85742295,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003675036,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005875795,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99871933},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7011204039","doi":"","title":"Legislating About Relocating Bill C-78, N.S. and B.C.","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Relocation; Appeal; Notice; Statute; Supreme court; Government (linguistics)","score_opus":0.015723792794735767,"score_gpt":0.27648948631200854,"score_spread":0.26076569351727275,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7011204039","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.63146347,0.0005347085,0.00003154109,0.0018653072,0.0005446661,0.00024611258,0.000002507729,0.00015008371,0.3651616],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9865622,0.00013215534,0.0005931428,0.0006475294,0.0005659302,0.000008739658,0.0000027927624,0.00001600096,0.011471516],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987099,0.00010383138,0.00022073691,0.00029056185,0.00032513618,0.00034982615],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992814,0.00013084401,0.00010842536,0.00020996612,0.00008099695,0.00018838525],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00079313584,0.00011074772,0.00016169461,0.00003817638,0.00066524255,0.00023008282,0.00015234806,0.00011556804,0.0006138813],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016730749,0.000097066186,0.00005056479,0.00018796253,0.00014792821,0.00046837755,0.00006441194,0.00021562201,0.0003207667],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003013375,0.000063536885,0.17501143,0.000068224246,0.000050692797,0.000009560076,0.022590414,0.00004234583,0.0036310565,0.73119813,0.0021907836,0.06511367],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039221262,0.00005245933,0.014568933,0.000104614825,0.000012302762,0.0000020251173,0.0024398132,0.00017736714,0.00013282768,0.0017818103,0.980092,0.00024364074],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.029417114,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0075768847,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9779012,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006233605,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008961455,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9770461},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7016059518","doi":"","title":"What of litigation?: Domestic courts and lawmaking processes in transnational law","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS)","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institute on Governance","funders":"","keywords":"Lawmaking; Globalization; Government (linguistics); Action (physics); Legislature; Legislation","score_opus":0.0295708467779748,"score_gpt":0.3255717681592132,"score_spread":0.2960009213812384,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7016059518","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99534166,0.00047743172,0.00008065478,0.00175085,0.00015656019,0.00014096149,0.00007407452,0.00006209378,0.0019157365],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99696755,0.0023113564,0.00010126597,0.000092701346,0.00012371328,0.0000071901827,0.00033721144,0.0000071304976,0.000051861774],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990389,0.000097735036,0.00018967302,0.00024243165,0.00023260273,0.00019869447],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991946,0.00049128936,0.000069675065,0.00014575153,0.000035186145,0.00006344792],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00074980763,0.000078610334,0.00012743726,0.000076644035,0.00032488824,0.00017121035,0.00025412982,0.00003908744,0.000006631667],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000015956324,0.00007698907,0.00000954154,0.00032387036,0.0002007047,0.0009161699,0.00010812295,0.00007669274,6.0300584e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013813037,0.00015964195,0.09819615,0.0026051274,0.00010200574,0.00003748218,0.43650812,0.0025619662,0.00061203534,0.39226884,0.00010324185,0.066707276],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015509279,0.00011352198,0.598196,0.0032686773,0.00011855606,0.000014979228,0.04497098,0.15671702,0.000047156624,0.06953924,0.12469289,0.0007700157],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018761064,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.045254577,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49999988,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00000781479,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005392883,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.972167},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7017783167","doi":"","title":"Canada-United States Law Institute annual conference : the world's longest undefended border: gateway or checkpoint? (DVD 1 of 3)","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Gateway (web page); State (computer science)","score_opus":0.02813175608480099,"score_gpt":0.2873405675343251,"score_spread":0.25920881144952407,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7017783167","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7151532,0.00034394456,0.00006665524,0.024791263,0.0014059953,0.0008551146,0.00037662743,0.00022658113,0.2567806],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9766525,0.0003844898,0.00008773426,0.0022618652,0.0002849489,0.000022333626,0.0000622191,0.00001764628,0.020226251],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977721,0.00022970508,0.00042879404,0.00030903917,0.00074926903,0.0005110749],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99840105,0.0002088395,0.0002191899,0.0003972113,0.00046798575,0.00030573827],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00049838645,0.00021291542,0.00029822078,0.000074246906,0.0014050741,0.000104968094,0.000557466,0.000103460334,0.0016991581],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00014739766,0.0001588522,0.00008218713,0.00080490526,0.0014788187,0.0004954731,0.000090716865,0.00035115404,0.00002963502],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00033929042,0.00026402005,0.002961889,0.000054198197,0.0001863681,0.00017368463,0.020990215,0.00026464864,0.00014183985,0.93524486,0.037243374,0.0021356414],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00047552248,0.00006433008,0.003575101,0.000046527686,0.000024988012,0.0000069291796,0.003326664,0.000034534587,0.0005584987,0.00062234804,0.99103224,0.00023233423],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95496583,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99690324,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9537889,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002070042,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020974812,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999895},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7017841418","doi":"","title":"Canada, Netherlands Agree on Treaty Treatment of Closed Mutual Funds","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS)","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Treaty; Government (linguistics); Investment (military)","score_opus":0.021921442015778836,"score_gpt":0.282350350235553,"score_spread":0.26042890821977416,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7017841418","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9731685,0.00009365226,0.000019583802,0.0004934289,0.00040051006,0.00014360088,0.00042566002,0.000037237663,0.025217855],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971744,0.00044025804,0.00009023909,0.00011039874,0.0007900218,0.000005177763,0.0004381148,0.000012175873,0.000939245],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99872535,0.00012374512,0.00020313248,0.00033603897,0.0002893523,0.00032235926],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988095,0.00029940155,0.00011109677,0.0005781559,0.000021840067,0.00017999204],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00031954123,0.0001580401,0.00022002065,0.000042177,0.00048416323,0.000058739908,0.00049643277,0.00006949516,0.000053580257],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000007016778,0.00012588133,0.000033495875,0.00013497676,0.00013875256,0.0001283261,0.000086134896,0.00011970678,0.0000019016381],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005397303,0.000478242,0.2193446,0.000087522465,0.00026869608,0.000035741352,0.067852914,0.00012715753,0.0022457999,0.0039368737,0.0024757734,0.702607],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008630278,0.00035962483,0.28263867,0.00007854629,0.000088423876,0.0000030641856,0.0024221635,0.011545866,0.00008166304,0.00016475932,0.70147467,0.00027952067],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8305702,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9895109,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.70232743,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003629809,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002292242,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.51332915},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7019798847","doi":"","title":"I giudici della Corte Suprema del Canada e la Judicial Cross-Fertilization: «a more cosmopolitan approach to law»?","year":2014,"lang":"it","type":"book-chapter","venue":"CINECA IRIS Institutional Research Information System (University of Bari Aldo Moro)","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Subject (documents); Identity (music); Constitution; Government (linguistics); Economic Justice; Field (mathematics); Perspective (graphical)","score_opus":0.05419468583203665,"score_gpt":0.29981256005631807,"score_spread":0.2456178742242814,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7019798847","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007030841,0.00007400858,0.028555334,0.0015262056,0.0007765903,0.001711813,0.0011166343,0.000103833234,0.9591047],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9768133,0.00013977001,0.00040007112,0.0003265683,0.0005053195,0.000007639144,0.0009083735,0.00002792644,0.020871026],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9919682,0.0004395614,0.0010670586,0.0006348574,0.0049857246,0.0009045852],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99202144,0.00040764597,0.0007821395,0.0007039666,0.0051092184,0.0009755823],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":["sts"],"category_scores_codex":[0.003824277,0.0005153887,0.00092172815,0.0009849904,0.004795741,0.00035324597,0.0013682601,0.0008663232,0.00051530736],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002969334,0.0006407563,0.00031192103,0.000786549,0.003077976,0.0017627394,0.0005957745,0.0009392375,0.0003166048],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003696965,0.000036083107,0.00028000612,0.0007196194,0.00017988181,0.00002313518,0.0052260333,0.0035719909,0.000005541838,0.967598,0.021082453,0.0009075167],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0014460913,0.00015692817,0.005834371,0.0008909349,0.00010044376,0.000043427255,0.016076488,0.008565099,0.0000056436875,0.00027865983,0.96596,0.00064186717],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.58570015,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08045545,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9697825,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0040347907,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006424437,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997885},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7023744948","doi":"","title":"Personal Connecting Factors","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Casebook; Conflict of laws; Private law; Common law; Public law; Jurisdiction; Municipal law; Comparative law; International law","score_opus":0.026778895591155816,"score_gpt":0.28665064855114164,"score_spread":0.2598717529599858,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7023744948","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.85036993,0.00015565056,0.000022562954,0.0015882152,0.0009684912,0.00012998037,0.00002044863,0.00017564153,0.14656909],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9937751,0.000009645354,0.000043657215,0.0005932007,0.0004607956,0.000016501102,0.00001175511,0.000012438527,0.005076863],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99861634,0.00019886691,0.00013723633,0.00021478077,0.00052170944,0.0003110591],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994921,0.000116434065,0.0000700146,0.00010482479,0.000039069157,0.00017754755],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00062077434,0.00008593149,0.000112038746,0.000037124642,0.0030511115,0.00012123284,0.00020633607,0.00004292546,0.011879077],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010669198,0.000094067356,0.000098381955,0.00021526497,0.00008901065,0.00020627161,0.0000965349,0.0003035976,0.00007887211],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000063994405,0.00023270438,0.064989306,0.000015413894,0.00009118263,0.000039889193,0.10475456,0.00009490596,0.0016623948,0.8065312,0.010236625,0.011287854],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017552792,0.000047206006,0.0023966536,0.0000031810478,0.0000084856,0.000001704687,0.021090463,0.000030112358,0.00006851809,0.0005957097,0.9754462,0.00013623116],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020042084,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006503485,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9652096,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002119672,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00011322257,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9982468},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7025031187","doi":"","title":"Spousal Support under British Columbia's New Family Law Act: A Preliminary Analysis","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Family law; Legislation; Spouse; Identification (biology); Government (linguistics)","score_opus":0.028116562750578483,"score_gpt":0.28517552560119336,"score_spread":0.25705896285061486,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7025031187","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4851165,0.00052789913,0.0003216127,0.0018412266,0.0009217582,0.0004234273,0.000046144978,0.00040090227,0.5104005],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92583025,0.00008442568,0.00037564314,0.0028586765,0.0009853985,0.00001752059,0.000054781616,0.000026661202,0.069766626],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974511,0.00019015209,0.0003725239,0.0004874473,0.0009032267,0.0005955327],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981527,0.000073352705,0.00013961772,0.00038856553,0.00022334822,0.0010224666],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009316679,0.00015008726,0.00037943484,0.00005606517,0.0007584299,0.0012922958,0.00041523555,0.00025155002,0.0030393659],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008631241,0.00023379344,0.0002718269,0.0008379817,0.00035076588,0.0007165161,0.000109261026,0.00027873344,0.00041719156],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002795978,0.0008682564,0.13466772,0.000034364228,0.0015709171,0.00055182073,0.011086875,0.0003649585,0.00016592733,0.1965547,0.6283938,0.025461007],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007249191,0.00021467241,0.07072121,0.00001900229,0.00037905475,0.000008106917,0.0019397784,0.000026922673,0.000005681518,0.0044459277,0.9211709,0.00034385506],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7804755,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.87057024,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.44071373,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00024245636,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007963617,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997445},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7025243950","doi":"","title":"West Brom breaks transfer record on Zenit's Rondon","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"Internet Archive (Internet Archive)","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Club; Transfer (computing); Set (abstract data type); Order (exchange); Quarter (Canadian coin)","score_opus":0.02167851626879516,"score_gpt":0.27456050309837554,"score_spread":0.2528819868295804,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7025243950","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.001208961,0.00025488922,0.0024779153,0.00064466003,0.0029199657,0.0010456786,0.0010780192,0.0007177793,0.98965216],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.022669477,0.0005685785,0.00032921715,0.00052428705,0.0031416274,0.000083804975,0.00075297436,0.0006129457,0.9713171],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9950187,0.00086695305,0.0007121181,0.001246199,0.0011038262,0.0010521626],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99781495,0.00037717717,0.00027780357,0.0007204024,0.000078191246,0.00073146576],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00052646606,0.00085474487,0.0009091129,0.0008325369,0.000113110014,0.0003043686,0.0014948872,0.0004486228,0.03294586],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010534739,0.00083209,0.0005423147,0.00019506652,0.00093689765,0.00014051893,0.00028492854,0.001232356,0.0058361134],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000417283,0.00022752781,0.00021629695,0.000048072812,0.0002875194,0.00009575164,0.017962797,0.0000012618102,0.000050199647,0.011687188,0.96272725,0.006278881],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009734664,0.00070953637,0.00028725446,0.0011833376,0.00011314877,0.000012948059,0.00034495792,0.000088994995,0.000043427674,0.0016509901,0.99371284,0.00087908446],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.22829182,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5207176,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.29242578,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00018877661,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00034334007,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999413},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7025249688","doi":"","title":"Tracking trends in innovation and mobility","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS)","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"UNESCO Institute for Statistics","funders":"","keywords":"Tracking (education); Tracking system; Radar tracker; Field (mathematics); Global Positioning System","score_opus":0.08824635478450506,"score_gpt":0.3378032517433447,"score_spread":0.24955689695883965,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7025249688","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12551686,0.0025864295,0.00014383059,0.0006417389,0.00051586033,0.00036810213,0.00054062286,0.0001711754,0.86951536],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92734766,0.003367711,0.0002642859,0.00023345214,0.0018278848,0.000010863628,0.0049839853,0.00007028465,0.061893865],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983415,0.000094757226,0.00038051166,0.0005836219,0.0003206851,0.00027889997],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99899983,0.00013698937,0.00020966686,0.00048504924,0.00006113794,0.00010732591],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018335889,0.00022497466,0.00030999983,0.00028501713,0.0003418896,0.00018152136,0.00046514536,0.00020738291,0.000050237584],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000012935532,0.00022493527,0.00002081261,0.00019637831,0.00022093179,0.00045666727,0.00039222333,0.00036849853,0.0000021723145],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007783412,0.00003877779,0.0075015617,0.00015952294,0.00005184204,0.000012938105,0.030671464,0.000033091106,0.00001433468,0.06633824,0.00070066995,0.8943997],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003696137,0.000048293612,0.034606755,0.00067447085,0.0000676597,0.0000040198624,0.0011820468,0.0070931683,2.632727e-7,0.019527692,0.9359593,0.0004667498],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0050131036,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06256413,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9352586,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000052624226,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000058633188,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9545416},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7027856991","doi":"","title":"Des faits et des sources. Marie-Ève Martel, Pas de lapin dans le chapeau. Coulisses éthiques et déontologiques du travail journalistique, Montréal, Éditions Somme toute, 2023, 150 pages","year":2024,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Érudit (Université de Montréal)","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Diaphragm muscle; Context (archaeology); Archaeomagnetic dating","score_opus":0.01662801743572041,"score_gpt":0.23145910590483337,"score_spread":0.21483108846911297,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7027856991","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.272623,0.4450545,0.009002019,0.23458682,0.00069768203,0.0004388686,0.00061361387,0.00070398,0.03627952],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.32851377,0.5967247,0.0020285572,0.0018270862,0.00067097996,0.000030991025,0.00011155783,0.00008660515,0.07000577],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9956617,0.0014799577,0.00048041772,0.0007002467,0.0005684382,0.0011092788],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975078,0.00085121085,0.00027164002,0.00032619952,0.00041514676,0.0006279749],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017798282,0.0005642012,0.0005762372,0.0003216431,0.0035630714,0.0005846862,0.0005972584,0.00067413464,0.0006303997],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00029957603,0.0006291582,0.00047730553,0.00073739595,0.0018439856,0.0018248295,0.00027614002,0.00088499795,0.00008503545],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016603195,0.00060074445,0.0044163377,0.00035391425,0.0007433961,0.0058804597,0.10177522,0.000448027,0.00090032467,0.40398994,0.3710017,0.1097239],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005257545,0.00027947457,0.020367384,0.0006495129,0.00040327356,0.00045802252,0.038972225,0.001235044,0.00016338269,0.020280967,0.9160092,0.0006557543],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.284048,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8297945,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.54574656,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005630726,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005845287,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99961597},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7029130710","doi":"","title":"Improving Canadian Indigenous Health: Diabetes &amp; Cardiovascular Disease","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"Scholarship@Western (Western University)","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Disease; CINAHL; Population; Public health; Diabetes mellitus; Social determinants of health; Population health","score_opus":0.07673275035199353,"score_gpt":0.31356635812983746,"score_spread":0.23683360777784393,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7029130710","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8491877,0.009282687,0.00032675735,0.0014306332,0.0044741267,0.0032794673,0.0008562905,0.0017617557,0.1294006],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0571754,0.001329101,0.000037592014,0.00068689283,0.0023646776,0.0000054794045,0.00024070442,0.00051953126,0.9376406],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9959345,0.00070351665,0.00025479708,0.00090952695,0.0008798637,0.0013178322],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964855,0.000038730857,0.0003312369,0.0010515677,0.00015497798,0.0019380002],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010158076,0.00047949565,0.0006398132,0.0013275769,0.0013848695,0.0004899092,0.0011009774,0.0006063213,0.0007342393],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000064981985,0.00060476066,0.0004837957,0.0006201256,0.00041091355,0.00057547743,0.0001969316,0.00053227064,0.0013281519],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018089102,0.000062057305,0.98412687,0.00023354265,0.0007197802,0.00020839108,0.0040160343,0.000002263951,0.0000021580809,0.00008116722,0.00059178815,0.00993787],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030337903,0.00004076521,0.083476916,0.0003614539,0.00023170981,8.48837e-7,0.00020679917,2.4827111e-8,0.0000013657508,0.000018400591,0.9147816,0.00057674735],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11483308,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.926754,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9141898,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014357629,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028748156,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999152},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7029377444","doi":"","title":"Introduction and Purpose of the Canada-United States Law Institute","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"State (computer science); Government (linguistics); Legislation; Work (physics); Focus (optics)","score_opus":0.008298697639075004,"score_gpt":0.23224592980682573,"score_spread":0.22394723216775073,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7029377444","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.94144005,0.00022937146,0.000018973313,0.017803064,0.0011236285,0.00024702272,0.000025237829,0.000043761727,0.03906887],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9948033,0.000062963794,0.000042358926,0.0006315399,0.0008975583,0.000005963601,0.00002180064,0.000005739943,0.0035287398],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991207,0.00008922475,0.00016917732,0.00014513917,0.00030104714,0.00017471153],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995455,0.000026453463,0.00008527086,0.0001654727,0.0001050022,0.00007230185],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00026097082,0.000072741794,0.00009830831,0.000022854983,0.0006237252,0.00006563269,0.00012723063,0.000051404604,0.00010970709],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003837783,0.000058613772,0.00002777346,0.00026780987,0.0004496459,0.00024398521,0.000034668345,0.00011493089,0.0000031961886],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012747177,0.000029192952,0.0029557,0.00001087117,0.000011177255,0.000001514992,0.00054744456,0.00020487803,0.00042460873,0.9793601,0.015710264,0.0007314857],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014836146,0.000011554699,0.006447842,0.0000096852045,0.000012771129,0.0000010088831,0.00030303397,0.000019274294,0.00070558564,0.0027665826,0.98950154,0.00007279371],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9792151,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99165326,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97659355,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010198988,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019002154,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47972527},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7029535576","doi":"","title":"Judicial reliance on the \"Spousal Support Advisory Guidelines\": Spousal support and soft law across Canadian jurisdictions","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"Open MIND","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Government (linguistics); Subject (documents); Derogation; Normative; Legislature; Subpoena","score_opus":0.06771648319441739,"score_gpt":0.3946146651608725,"score_spread":0.32689818196645515,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7029535576","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1989204,0.00009834473,0.0000024130604,0.0075436477,0.0038809674,0.0015987257,0.0007674762,0.000014544402,0.78717345],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.73583,0.00047852445,0.00011860493,0.002484833,0.001434465,0.0001040037,0.0014800814,0.00008865759,0.25798082],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99702835,0.00014278083,0.00062134385,0.0007339507,0.0006893787,0.0007841932],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998151,0.00015729498,0.00035000162,0.00049555633,0.0004327667,0.0004133509],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018488762,0.00036133404,0.0004467652,0.000113008224,0.002527426,0.00085626927,0.0009012179,0.0006212577,0.006256612],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020078073,0.00032078696,0.00014267597,0.00029500385,0.00031639318,0.00039794223,0.00007686083,0.0006161146,0.0012847157],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008165827,0.00028455455,0.002603639,0.00005747994,0.0003754653,0.0002290753,0.19673899,0.000035383997,0.0001900676,0.033516396,0.21378717,0.5513652],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030018628,0.00015823334,0.0037785696,0.00010114746,0.00007738595,0.0000047349126,0.014810294,0.000014358355,0.00003778005,0.000102014514,0.9802238,0.0003915292],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.43729886,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.93106616,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7664366,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00025932986,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036916572,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999244},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7029755098","doi":"","title":"L’étranger avec qui je partage ma vie : l’enrichissement injustifié entre conjoints de fait québécois","year":2022,"lang":"fr","type":"dissertation","venue":"Papyrus : Institutional Repository (Université de Montréal)","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Paid work; Power (physics)","score_opus":0.006354703216265444,"score_gpt":0.2029335724650793,"score_spread":0.19657886924881385,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7029755098","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.796269,0.017839778,0.00008884664,0.0031044297,0.0041077225,0.0008315534,0.00023267312,0.00019943694,0.17732657],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.83981055,0.0030291,0.00016401261,0.00033032123,0.00057970866,0.000093862436,0.0007495181,0.000051703093,0.15519121],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9951545,0.0005532059,0.0007207003,0.0009914692,0.0015878933,0.0009922503],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99754226,0.0001970309,0.00074326416,0.00046547895,0.00033684738,0.00071513624],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006237547,0.0006704734,0.00063572417,0.00038180916,0.016185582,0.00014721275,0.0007441953,0.00064844097,0.0036920782],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000834854,0.0008550381,0.0006534243,0.000741738,0.0005982237,0.0005595793,0.0002365115,0.00088461174,0.00017234472],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011065293,0.00090835884,0.013912809,0.00032797456,0.00094258523,0.0033451545,0.7781934,0.0011870037,0.009176493,0.16462111,0.0039007326,0.02237783],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008788505,0.00017328518,0.030398607,0.00019345619,0.0007187623,0.00015857468,0.22647797,0.00055878964,0.00092162326,0.00028433392,0.7384521,0.0007836545],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.46030432,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.35573116,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.73455137,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014882621,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00505193,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99939007},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7029794092","doi":"","title":"Laval – Hameau du Grand Grenoux","year":2024,"lang":"fr","type":"other","venue":"Industrias Culturais (Universidade de Coimbra)","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Order (exchange); Suite; Falling (accident)","score_opus":0.02740679818249149,"score_gpt":0.2594777543382265,"score_spread":0.23207095615573503,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7029794092","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0062351683,0.002542657,0.000062627485,0.0661811,0.004790278,0.00065185083,0.00026358938,0.00042728492,0.9188454],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.04792149,0.0014207638,0.000077901954,0.0003944736,0.005203002,0.000012852575,0.00009555982,0.00022261286,0.94465137],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963225,0.00045274186,0.00040575958,0.00096496346,0.00082608254,0.0010279552],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982293,0.00014937659,0.00037982033,0.00040932855,0.0002016889,0.0006304794],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00058420317,0.0007043989,0.00073078496,0.000450415,0.00076014834,0.00058643596,0.000836247,0.0022979798,0.03294836],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00016514199,0.0007266065,0.0005885106,0.0012772677,0.0010522938,0.0004960248,0.00021809003,0.0016059265,0.0060882648],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000057737285,0.00014263958,0.00029681547,0.00009459371,0.00060583715,0.0005763616,0.027104191,0.000014863681,0.00026457454,0.10501924,0.8327488,0.03307439],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010862148,0.00014973887,0.00407022,0.0006570798,0.0006398486,0.00006448918,0.0077560656,0.00006586134,0.00004459675,0.0006011752,0.98401463,0.00085005135],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021798154,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012218552,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1512659,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010653717,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00074663194,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9995185},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7032991359","doi":"","title":"Parallel proceedings in China, Korea and Japan : a comparative analysis of the development of general international jurisdiction rules","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"Open MIND","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; International investment; Tribunal; Modernization theory","score_opus":0.041812931643262226,"score_gpt":0.3483181780305122,"score_spread":0.30650524638724996,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7032991359","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.39730057,0.00007216809,0.000008400403,0.00012639917,0.000075885495,0.0002141591,0.000021818492,6.29421e-7,0.60217994],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6494384,0.00020208229,0.011101563,0.000009390198,0.00015396759,0.000038105823,0.00013191665,0.000025801295,0.3388988],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991748,0.000036715322,0.0002538803,0.00018800782,0.00026621658,0.00008038244],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995234,0.00001053389,0.0003220688,0.00005912284,0.000059826445,0.000025050707],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00031706886,0.000085049694,0.00029833132,0.00021721765,0.00007124307,0.000058317368,0.0002790335,0.00009865085,0.0028964295],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000011053727,0.00006822727,0.000056290613,0.00038389518,0.00012953042,0.00005389573,0.00013864411,0.00007202067,0.0000011022345],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001225741,0.00061871734,0.22214572,0.00005751387,0.004382032,0.0000011930248,0.6302612,0.000057416964,0.0008038093,0.006748507,0.007490352,0.12731096],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027793244,0.000010059219,0.35245818,0.00020539961,0.00018193551,1.6781276e-7,0.004421422,0.00023279256,0.00016591845,0.000023708477,0.641898,0.0001245249],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005332329,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.061297596,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6344076,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000053295615,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00019366546,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99801505},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7037944048","doi":"","title":"Final decision in the Laval case","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Lund University Publications (Lund University)","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nucleofection; Gestational period; TSG101; Dysgeusia; Liquation; Diafiltration; Emperipolesis; Triacetin; Demotion","score_opus":0.025886503183038378,"score_gpt":0.2662477812073222,"score_spread":0.2403612780242838,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7037944048","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.26755854,0.0000036937531,0.000681421,0.0065181246,0.00017166893,0.00018119192,0.000015187712,0.000072417875,0.7247977],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4773399,0.00014923904,0.001055072,0.00017666307,0.00023356162,3.912181e-7,0.000028738052,0.0000093886165,0.52100706],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989275,0.00019544148,0.00008641745,0.0002563549,0.0002680309,0.00026625657],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989141,0.00031532394,0.00007290973,0.00036096905,0.00019313607,0.0001435279],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000538459,0.00009112661,0.00009038998,0.0006418215,0.002094344,0.00014274938,0.00070278044,0.0001575087,0.00039283265],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00010624851,0.000097271084,0.000086326734,0.0020406675,0.00034209123,0.00090608606,0.00009977793,0.00038197023,0.000033910415],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021948956,0.00011738161,0.002124804,0.0000010472228,0.000007392546,0.00023691493,0.0048630494,0.000004266929,0.000021740465,0.98651314,0.0023783825,0.0037099181],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004487007,0.000017127204,0.005709391,0.0000032774005,0.000029640922,0.00004294264,0.018508278,0.00006011289,0.0000012305501,0.00039459474,0.97467,0.000114738476],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01005231,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1417773,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98611856,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017947589,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00034479043,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992048},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7038179209","doi":"","title":"Harmonizing jurisdiction in transnational cases: a deep comparative inquiry","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"eScholarship@McGill (McGill)","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Discretion; Common law; Judicial discretion; Equity (law); Legal culture; Comparative law; Legal research; Judicial opinion","score_opus":0.09793150739387599,"score_gpt":0.3262352736123033,"score_spread":0.22830376621842732,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7038179209","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.778106,0.00029545155,0.0000011442169,0.0000531273,0.002511692,0.00086638296,0.00022749312,0.0002409718,0.21769777],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9934626,0.00038708615,0.0002565008,0.00012073999,0.00020732265,0.0002471014,0.0008241967,0.00008913136,0.0044052694],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99513423,0.00080122496,0.0010326481,0.0010110536,0.0012151592,0.0008056935],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977682,0.00036231137,0.0005956389,0.00034628075,0.00057303056,0.00035448946],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015858625,0.0006118702,0.00075084803,0.000819205,0.0022324587,0.00014725677,0.0005597604,0.0010654274,0.0009648322],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00025008948,0.00073412457,0.000362995,0.0010181124,0.00020320331,0.0014275016,0.000038997317,0.0015590552,0.00013829688],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007212682,0.0006891172,0.00022149162,0.00017479877,0.0002512928,0.00018134007,0.010106595,0.000044259898,0.0032503954,0.879354,0.000010189355,0.104995236],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00439996,0.000679843,0.03788052,0.0010750659,0.0007255237,0.000053234868,0.054995228,0.00015018762,0.013650403,0.0690891,0.8130393,0.0042616483],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0055831214,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12708706,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8130291,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012366779,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00023625861,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99994844},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7043408338","doi":"","title":"3.5 S. Woodson Canada, University of Missouri Registra","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Blue Tiger Commons (Lincoln University - Missouri)","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Work (physics); Watt; Government (linguistics)","score_opus":0.03332698040260732,"score_gpt":0.23181438822902775,"score_spread":0.19848740782642044,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7043408338","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.78785896,0.0001967664,0.00034620843,0.007887982,0.0003697284,0.00032094834,0.00009379737,0.0001385632,0.20278706],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9496554,0.00006491897,0.00026578203,0.00005164989,0.00013119086,6.393365e-8,0.00001667657,0.000011690447,0.04980264],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99815917,0.0003358931,0.0001613668,0.00030061393,0.0006286241,0.00041432833],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982349,0.00013611892,0.00023056356,0.00040170044,0.00037330133,0.00062337646],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005666331,0.00016560065,0.00030051728,0.00014069113,0.00083234545,0.000026273776,0.00070357096,0.0001935572,0.00034917792],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000084713676,0.00022456596,0.0001666367,0.0005387909,0.00042853502,0.00021648388,0.0001523183,0.00024203482,0.000029610863],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0017709524,0.0013885138,0.07669965,0.0001254069,0.0007628798,0.002012642,0.16868563,0.0011404456,0.0003991045,0.05682517,0.6761164,0.014073171],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009162441,0.000059431015,0.004702118,0.000033924414,0.00008966092,0.0000023918246,0.028726336,0.00004502305,0.00006394793,0.000082720595,0.965036,0.00024225086],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8624262,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.93322796,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2889195,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009515007,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002505071,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.91575336},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7066330393","doi":"","title":"Ideas of Spousal Support Entitlement","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Entitlement (fair division); Affect (linguistics); Duration (music); Supreme court; Child support","score_opus":0.014746999171852637,"score_gpt":0.2860893629103817,"score_spread":0.27134236373852905,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7066330393","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3145127,0.00006488534,0.00032895934,0.0014465129,0.000823148,0.00019698017,0.000009893306,0.00009535825,0.6825216],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9900264,0.000037066115,0.00023075889,0.00042404112,0.000510531,0.000006861254,0.0000066789407,0.000008439329,0.0087491805],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988839,0.0000955588,0.00021775438,0.000156173,0.00040952722,0.00023707004],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99943006,0.000043149525,0.00009229509,0.00019274921,0.00008387988,0.00015786654],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008528979,0.000073235125,0.00013777714,0.000032066746,0.00022908782,0.000048495403,0.00018353011,0.000067333975,0.0058183586],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008224861,0.00007358382,0.000078745055,0.000108314365,0.00015134618,0.00015458303,0.00003842268,0.00008572067,0.00044522146],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014820883,0.000075935015,0.010231722,0.00001437493,0.000019860014,0.0000020262057,0.0014920037,0.0000033447848,0.00079256174,0.9724461,0.008801881,0.0061053927],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024184005,0.00007511125,0.004610992,0.000012026882,0.000014028037,3.6980686e-7,0.00023799787,0.000007051485,0.0006655375,0.0038238948,0.99022037,0.000090782756],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009302241,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008825887,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9814185,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000045679568,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000086263804,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9972949},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7067131376","doi":"","title":"L’accord en médiation en Belgique, cadre juridique et considérations pratiques","year":2021,"lang":"fr","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Digital Access to Libraries (Université catholique de Louvain (UCL), l'Université de Namur (UNamur) and the Université Saint-Louis (USL-B))","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Subpoena; Identity (music); Legitimacy","score_opus":0.013944414052310122,"score_gpt":0.23254694566351775,"score_spread":0.21860253161120763,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7067131376","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1097581,0.0020628863,0.006064241,0.06336376,0.0006107976,0.0024266155,0.0015149816,0.00063543965,0.81356317],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.45889166,0.014977236,0.0012991446,0.004917128,0.0007650767,0.000022649905,0.00148053,0.00029421542,0.51735234],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9929486,0.0016949761,0.000847076,0.0018122713,0.0011346481,0.0015624423],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9928834,0.002570092,0.0011401214,0.0011113689,0.00094853505,0.0013464873],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014694561,0.0015045047,0.0016068956,0.0013445122,0.0043035476,0.0026599776,0.0025964477,0.00202241,0.00201719],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00043009853,0.0017196399,0.0010043673,0.0015026464,0.002502671,0.0033261192,0.0037899131,0.0019807685,0.00012755944],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0011430008,0.00015197121,0.0015836089,0.00015329628,0.0007582958,0.0012322576,0.13480508,0.00027682158,0.000066660345,0.8491621,0.0023925293,0.008274389],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0029048447,0.00036756913,0.0054820315,0.00057663705,0.0009989471,0.00029968855,0.012152932,0.00045516397,0.00018565336,0.010957305,0.9637436,0.0018755966],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007137068,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0058176704,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9613511,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0046112197,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00406103,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997704},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7071856384","doi":"","title":"Unintended Consequences: The New Test for Interlocutory Mandatory Injunctions","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Interlocutory; Prima facie; Test (biology); Supreme court; High Court","score_opus":0.02572105252229743,"score_gpt":0.3053892936091394,"score_spread":0.27966824108684196,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7071856384","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014925906,0.010091202,0.013218563,0.24086583,0.019520747,0.0033057104,0.0003046006,0.0027180964,0.69504935],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9165599,0.00022150986,0.0002891604,0.0024043387,0.0023307663,0.00010893054,0.0000147218525,0.000026886722,0.07804384],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988438,0.00008928708,0.00022039107,0.0002775879,0.00025904304,0.0003099075],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989655,0.00043708642,0.00004475028,0.00023634525,0.000104387815,0.00021192033],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006964944,0.00012401746,0.00012428498,0.000056790257,0.0009561542,0.00042882276,0.0003145774,0.00010875097,0.001198235],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00032450948,0.000093619754,0.00014997256,0.00027354524,0.0011205022,0.00036984775,0.00003911728,0.00027169578,0.0003244872],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013847425,0.00002323437,0.000105311396,0.000016913802,0.000042769738,0.000005221032,0.0033058932,0.0000026946827,0.00046233137,0.8748344,0.11493443,0.0062529617],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014721912,0.00008212261,0.00010120373,0.00007695137,0.00004289263,0.0000036713154,0.0023714122,0.00005160411,0.00016024477,0.027087426,0.9697485,0.00012675603],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009373863,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024701431,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9016339,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017253103,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00073037186,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997148},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7072474066","doi":"","title":"Why Solar Energy is Taking Over Edmonton","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"","score_opus":0.019386760246559904,"score_gpt":0.30965148255495406,"score_spread":0.2902647223083942,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7072474066","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0000012873016,0.002405646,0.0003797975,0.002319979,0.0014443279,0.000060653783,0.000010368197,0.00040872509,0.9929692],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00037283677,0.0012272147,0.000050199196,0.0036223144,0.0025118566,0.0000063927296,0.0000042286515,0.00017562142,0.9920293],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99904186,0.0000340622,0.000100157486,0.00026337904,0.0003456328,0.00021492728],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99966663,0.000010890461,0.00008646921,0.0001501638,0.000014954025,0.000070900875],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00013154381,0.00013066821,0.00014624023,0.00013266501,0.00009380034,0.0001585737,0.0001419673,0.00033398267,0.094199836],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000008761107,0.00011708745,0.00011386868,0.00014222208,0.00006625994,0.00004714743,0.00003974452,0.00010363914,0.00043102278],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[6.3102226e-7,0.0000063939497,0.000006899863,0.000010208326,0.000033090917,0.000004241098,0.0012274975,9.657697e-9,0.000004864384,0.055934377,0.9323801,0.010391694],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000035791723,0.000007720428,0.00000628194,0.00009756891,0.000027967562,1.6302592e-7,0.00016315511,0.000006852416,0.000009359175,0.0008769877,0.9986092,0.00015895702],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2001565,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12111142,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09376881,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005842058,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006322798,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9066282},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7095553874","doi":"","title":"of Surfaces by Self-Assembly Par","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Limiting; Center (category theory)","score_opus":0.01065489390609067,"score_gpt":0.2737166963962663,"score_spread":0.26306180249017563,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7095553874","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.805457,0.00004287052,0.00014984226,0.0058353343,0.00010455377,0.000047770223,0.0000028138884,0.00007580202,0.18828402],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99143213,0.00018882037,0.00011321597,0.00003829993,0.00003623534,0.000001164264,1.6385034e-7,0.0000020837356,0.008187903],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99955744,0.00003514601,0.00007971271,0.00006720235,0.00015612332,0.00010440453],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99975264,0.00006953015,0.00003423143,0.000057454545,0.00004347055,0.00004264911],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00024700983,0.000028985529,0.000055318058,0.000011389049,0.000090550086,0.000009835519,0.00007439283,0.00003615629,0.0004903614],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000018625396,0.000017822938,0.000024250628,0.00006146821,0.000053345124,0.00011001853,0.0000093679555,0.00001037338,0.000031852745],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026457032,0.00032454243,0.14592361,0.000014684318,0.00008034102,0.000001180609,0.01720359,2.7901092e-7,0.24919482,0.31182387,0.15995044,0.11545617],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013433212,0.000030043317,0.0071610897,0.0000050834096,0.0000046772707,4.6073914e-8,0.00037567594,0.0000020608209,0.019803014,0.0003476494,0.972083,0.000053341064],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019565343,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008778544,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.81213254,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001631928,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003875882,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.53691137},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7095654883","doi":"","title":"Frequently Used Databases Database Name","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Trademark; Statute; Statutory law; European union; Intellectual property; Legal research; Legislature; Variety (cybernetics)","score_opus":0.10245657323432875,"score_gpt":0.3354239558571542,"score_spread":0.23296738262282543,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7095654883","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10821838,0.00048621418,0.001616411,0.007968361,0.00062285084,0.00023706577,0.00007516921,0.0004037591,0.8803718],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9658302,0.0005265149,0.0009759804,0.00064145593,0.00042916942,0.0000074978875,0.00003136079,0.000008156452,0.031549636],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991341,0.00006279742,0.00011200344,0.00016600681,0.0003033936,0.00022166403],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995161,0.00007278913,0.00003104292,0.00022201969,0.000034475157,0.00012355577],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002660007,0.00006192131,0.000073442854,0.000039268056,0.00037131962,0.00006316801,0.00014070523,0.00002688518,0.02464532],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009187928,0.000057190297,0.00003620088,0.00014582413,0.00011451601,0.00045864898,0.00003296121,0.000062812636,0.00080482743],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008683958,0.00039321536,0.01777569,0.0000135756145,0.000038195092,0.000045011417,0.016313735,0.0000018365049,0.0019731536,0.7028275,0.20324546,0.057363898],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014778238,0.000010593482,0.00041905872,0.0000068112554,0.0000072330226,5.957212e-7,0.00076295657,0.00013921558,0.0001565508,0.00007149285,0.99818355,0.00009415781],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010165713,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0068109403,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85761184,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000033587716,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000020967462,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999732},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7096080617","doi":"","title":"CEPS Special Report/March 2009","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Temptation; Legislation; Supreme court; Interpretation (philosophy); Human rights; Relation (database); Hearsay","score_opus":0.06926705941248526,"score_gpt":0.3580854265485957,"score_spread":0.2888183671361104,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7096080617","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020556858,0.000020175827,0.00015232302,0.014115866,0.0012743169,0.00007908434,8.133461e-7,0.000083001454,0.9637176],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5601182,0.00004208355,0.0006914572,0.0004933359,0.0349781,0.000006942526,0.000010067114,0.000010173791,0.40364966],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992063,0.00004423127,0.000115569375,0.000113632195,0.00035625094,0.00016398325],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995723,0.000016535147,0.000034255,0.0001046523,0.000107865126,0.00016444264],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007778291,0.000037162747,0.000059279813,0.000027415,0.000161169,0.00005729088,0.00008294234,0.000050782484,0.0028972647],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001540167,0.00003376795,0.00003126246,0.000132876,0.00007871442,0.00012310166,0.000019944891,0.000050418672,0.00029989652],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001326609,0.00004168865,0.0038795264,7.0075197e-7,0.000005567045,0.00007848874,0.008494162,0.0000010586303,0.000016486856,0.14631839,0.8137533,0.027397323],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009211205,0.000018063829,0.0022095079,7.2715704e-7,0.0000024946808,0.0000043544414,0.0016652951,0.000004154368,0.000016300362,0.0022732152,0.99366134,0.000052449137],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004590137,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005688406,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5600679,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000055050255,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002032712,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9980142},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7099389732","doi":"","title":"www.publish.csiro.au/journals/ijwf International Journal of Wildland Fire, 2006, 15, 87–97 Spatio-temporal analysis of wildfire ignitions in the St Johns River Water Management District, Florida","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Arson; Lightning (connector); Cluster analysis; Hydrology (agriculture); Wildland–urban interface; Index (typography)","score_opus":0.019720472726035096,"score_gpt":0.2831614331698858,"score_spread":0.2634409604438507,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7099389732","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9357281,0.00005128353,0.0029918584,0.008354921,0.0009018294,0.00020930066,0.000065755354,0.000015634863,0.05168135],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972711,0.00028218556,0.00016456177,0.00024626392,0.0006130072,0.000006162489,0.000109204986,0.0000059827144,0.0013015171],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99753326,0.00025331174,0.00066328107,0.00015972617,0.0011255542,0.0002648401],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99891835,0.00011392471,0.00035947078,0.00018314099,0.0003274327,0.000097677774],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002129822,0.00012440232,0.00027930326,0.0006515957,0.00028492865,0.00027075745,0.00063003873,0.00007595774,0.0014038673],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007216385,0.00007793385,0.0002770868,0.0009069672,0.00020851138,0.00066264975,0.00007204766,0.0001867348,0.000007905311],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001561545,0.00085585,0.8729099,0.000015857375,0.0024278697,0.000050645725,0.03919417,0.0018396833,0.000012871078,0.007528412,0.02709722,0.047911346],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011525545,0.00010233325,0.49878973,0.000057263318,0.0007680922,0.0000048885877,0.005364284,0.0026381745,0.000021205386,0.0015018466,0.48938057,0.00021906226],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010855795,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023504741,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.46228337,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017261031,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008706099,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.999509},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7100315909","doi":"","title":"SHORT COMMUNICATION ANALYSIS OF GEOMORPHOLOGY CITATIONS IN THE LAST QUARTER OF THE 20TH CENTURY","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Quarter (Canadian coin); Landform; Multidisciplinary approach; Citation; Citation analysis; Scientific communication; Bibliometrics","score_opus":0.024848649251201532,"score_gpt":0.3195211932315428,"score_spread":0.29467254398034126,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7100315909","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.91699576,0.000043184682,0.00009835711,0.0051019993,0.00003271006,0.000101739446,0.000004241581,0.000004031625,0.07761797],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994609,0.00024772342,0.00002286609,0.00013517684,0.000008492419,0.000004868421,0.000008302964,8.737156e-7,0.000110804795],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992953,0.000281692,0.00015698692,0.00004609675,0.00015306928,0.00006683356],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994612,0.00017417867,0.00005626451,0.00023273833,0.00006690669,0.000008766112],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00058654964,0.00002494108,0.00007941286,0.000081645034,0.0001325653,0.000007820527,0.0002480938,0.00003320463,0.00030682684],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000029012339,0.000014717778,0.000070337715,0.0010449338,0.00019295607,0.000047261175,0.000015934967,0.000051303963,9.617296e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006035564,0.0001478133,0.8552526,0.0000010898758,0.00008854282,1.7705928e-7,0.053588584,0.00013637745,0.00014133668,0.086349174,0.0007189141,0.0035693287],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004223045,0.000008266376,0.9577858,0.0000022298354,0.000085688465,1.4628782e-7,0.018476928,0.00012020641,0.0000070138403,0.00019896706,0.023253381,0.000019176836],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008701135,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.118582316,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.109881185,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000013153081,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000020006933,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9979},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7103289453","doi":"","title":"Compensation for Extraordinary Rendition: AComparative Study and the Need for a Domestic Cause ofAction in the United States","year":2014,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"Scholarly Commons (University of the Pacific)","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Action (physics); Compensation (psychology); Cause of action; Government (linguistics); Legislation","score_opus":0.044349013234526155,"score_gpt":0.29114056827476587,"score_spread":0.2467915550402397,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7103289453","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.96254957,0.00005970968,0.0051412047,0.02672045,0.00035684212,0.0037414848,0.00012937072,0.000019825915,0.0012815745],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99923915,0.00008974493,0.00007142956,0.000063976986,0.00007020024,0.00001474305,0.00004510556,0.000008204042,0.0003974425],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961884,0.0025884027,0.00025979662,0.00028903515,0.00041154135,0.00026283917],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958983,0.002761162,0.00045190426,0.00045436717,0.000373172,0.00006110908],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0041337945,0.00018573251,0.00034314656,0.00022012983,0.0040812697,0.00038132904,0.00071001676,0.00011831672,0.00002650751],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00024197789,0.0001306669,0.00019773176,0.0010097366,0.0011673112,0.0010530604,0.00012564252,0.00043998202,0.0000019039511],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0049436484,0.0013635397,0.024097428,0.000088709276,0.0005133278,0.0000022467211,0.8778787,0.0007856081,0.0001243584,0.08119378,0.0029564658,0.006052139],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0072664022,0.0009242111,0.18995844,0.00008382578,0.00068331376,0.0000037047025,0.7332325,0.023322277,0.0000035045794,0.012003717,0.032289006,0.00022908197],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007163075,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014011432,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16586101,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00012424076,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007223852,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994483},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7104253091","doi":"10.71781/1858","title":"Le droit de l'OHADA face au commerce électronique","year":2011,"lang":"fr","type":"dissertation","venue":"Papyrus : Institutional Repository (Université de Montréal)","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Face (sociological concept); Context (archaeology); Legal certainty","score_opus":0.007986705366992987,"score_gpt":0.19569668302031107,"score_spread":0.1877099776533181,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7104253091","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.57766014,0.006769365,0.0013536945,0.0010434897,0.0015837263,0.00042298879,0.00004548223,0.00015455858,0.41096655],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7846278,0.0012839894,0.0002508801,0.0001660668,0.00038188172,0.000025716423,0.00022420275,0.000034557524,0.2130049],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99695706,0.00038347277,0.0004303037,0.00065207225,0.0007000769,0.0008770344],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99813914,0.00012427197,0.00049881206,0.0003707491,0.0002967365,0.00057026476],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00046146582,0.0004609448,0.00045687868,0.00020888075,0.016367149,0.000081010396,0.0006632219,0.00084138894,0.00015747677],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000046638517,0.0006272817,0.00045293337,0.00044849972,0.0007212207,0.00060384104,0.00012580954,0.00071431603,0.00010902255],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005293212,0.00040715508,0.013571144,0.00010863115,0.0003576071,0.0004683275,0.2721364,0.0004228469,0.0057994155,0.6972413,0.0004661219,0.008491719],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0011994566,0.00025364064,0.08189973,0.00036394244,0.0005575516,0.00033226385,0.1457273,0.0008074418,0.010450471,0.0034707626,0.75374883,0.0011886026],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7810559,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.43656594,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7532827,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012674927,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0108156605,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996179},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7104288863","doi":"10.71781/2227","title":"Parallel proceedings in China, Korea and Japan : a comparative analysis of the development of general international jurisdiction rules","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"Papyrus : Institutional Repository (Université de Montréal)","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; International investment; Tribunal; Modernization theory","score_opus":0.008776333270194175,"score_gpt":0.22722466177456146,"score_spread":0.2184483285043673,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7104288863","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9256902,0.0010197139,0.000014532073,0.000117152784,0.00032157236,0.00017751382,0.000022215836,0.000011437668,0.07262569],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9876463,0.00026754558,0.00055613194,0.0000054533934,0.000049805054,0.000012602756,0.00021266632,0.0000042757697,0.011245254],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985588,0.000059656675,0.00038020444,0.00026472457,0.00059603306,0.00014056163],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999037,0.000027372556,0.00046951108,0.00008432953,0.00031466392,0.00006706707],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002330516,0.0001481765,0.0003384895,0.0004120587,0.0017384863,0.000029139092,0.00022739598,0.00019058667,0.000027038126],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000023843882,0.00014523494,0.00017980575,0.00059288985,0.00020055131,0.0001793556,0.00007127256,0.00016902608,3.4706952e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00040137224,0.00023031612,0.17574686,0.00006710672,0.0015625136,0.000011155723,0.76259065,0.0007422095,0.0050389967,0.049996994,0.00005659289,0.0035552506],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003172761,0.000012363432,0.91335356,0.00013666846,0.0003972372,0.0000032830576,0.07415939,0.00078918465,0.0016370289,0.00007686461,0.008971466,0.0001456677],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03752525,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1367465,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7376067,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013545111,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0011793443,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99956113},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7112575025","doi":"","title":"Financial Leasing (Uniform Law)","year":2017,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Factoring; Convention; Personal property; Scope (computer science); Property (philosophy); Real estate","score_opus":0.026287140270579237,"score_gpt":0.29461645729310487,"score_spread":0.26832931702252566,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7112575025","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23760146,0.0008517947,0.00010049524,0.0074998043,0.0064338157,0.0005263858,0.00004659745,0.0001525884,0.7467871],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9740071,0.00064471347,0.00027196782,0.0017596267,0.0056403605,0.00001978977,0.000007577682,0.000045347148,0.01760348],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99610984,0.00019393142,0.00064160593,0.00080060575,0.0010379774,0.0012160251],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99690026,0.00009501278,0.0007115195,0.0013693424,0.00028179638,0.00064209],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014999334,0.00044348268,0.0005728794,0.00006138204,0.013446163,0.0028919026,0.0015169133,0.0006129567,0.00353245],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000550059,0.0004966826,0.00043179546,0.00018591981,0.002027667,0.0026965872,0.00042898027,0.00084643724,0.0019276942],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007775662,0.00013939104,0.0015634841,0.00003703411,0.00003776545,0.000043689404,0.0030635127,0.000004093633,0.00019678262,0.96622777,0.0020388449,0.026569849],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009804111,0.00016724743,0.015829258,0.00024413911,0.00009462421,0.000005498872,0.0006123605,0.00009442843,0.00025616869,0.022628676,0.95842916,0.0006580251],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08637401,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12519991,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9563903,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00032296978,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00060234143,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99974847},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7112905474","doi":"","title":"(Un)regulation of extraordinary expenses for children in family crises: comparative insights from the canadian model","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Nova Science Publishers (Nova Science Publishers, Inc.)","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Discretion; Appeal; Legislation; Normative; Perspective (graphical); Balance (ability); Best practice","score_opus":0.08572185253320347,"score_gpt":0.34796822781738856,"score_spread":0.2622463752841851,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7112905474","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8812773,0.0008200322,0.0017274678,0.019304123,0.004428797,0.002137066,0.0001271482,0.00020874942,0.08996932],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99589896,0.000009751486,0.0025804152,0.00082092604,0.0003177722,0.000079272235,0.00005729804,0.00002301172,0.00021258177],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9929978,0.00012031291,0.00081583386,0.001549055,0.003013406,0.001503544],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99597305,0.0004455686,0.00028952723,0.0007880516,0.0017697104,0.0007340744],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":["sts","scholarly_communication"],"category_scores_codex":[0.006795701,0.0003722043,0.00044862446,0.0022866684,0.0032946542,0.013921397,0.0040433807,0.0002615405,0.00024168678],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014168076,0.00030445133,0.00015737223,0.013113138,0.0093074655,0.035374124,0.00031148194,0.0005550935,0.000014456865],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013581192,0.0005189895,0.015574942,0.000046028494,0.000110418216,0.000012394885,0.28877687,0.008823831,0.021083072,0.4987,0.10128874,0.06492889],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0020309875,0.0003746095,0.6511619,0.0004768354,0.000111415364,0.000009980914,0.09358045,0.0941164,0.0020471308,0.08544856,0.068550006,0.002091733],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5179198,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3939712,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.635587,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023096045,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020049646,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99994075},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7118503195","doi":"10.4324/9781003080510-4/douez-facebook-privacy-class-actions-janet-walker?context=ubx&amp;refid=634613d3-10f5-4cae-9aa7-41495e1453ec","title":"Douez v Facebook and Privacy Class Actions","year":2020,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Waiver; Doctrine; Supreme court; Relevance (law); Class (philosophy); Field (mathematics); Face (sociological concept)","score_opus":0.04194384660272514,"score_gpt":0.2977682073778901,"score_spread":0.25582436077516496,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7118503195","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20286326,0.0021346319,0.00042652976,0.10623848,0.0025017054,0.002232987,0.00010609663,0.00052226987,0.68297404],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9817903,0.0018458928,0.00016291278,0.005327796,0.0022933553,0.000059016922,0.000007958808,0.000039588638,0.008473195],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99694973,0.00030831675,0.00054488936,0.00079951563,0.00068015105,0.00071737805],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977607,0.00016096153,0.00024059216,0.00036568678,0.00014733468,0.0013246879],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00045672225,0.00036111934,0.00044515982,0.000051100968,0.0020110987,0.00078131875,0.00045368346,0.00036934964,0.0064891046],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00021686773,0.00039659947,0.00021542158,0.0005096129,0.0007583801,0.0009929689,0.00029047544,0.0007685512,0.0018009159],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003095955,0.0003474562,0.0058739805,0.00023231212,0.00039590275,0.000058094935,0.06225532,0.000041835163,0.006926029,0.83872133,0.036669884,0.04816824],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008231233,0.00022485302,0.0022077346,0.000056321576,0.00011485031,0.0000035839346,0.0026423912,0.00028457033,0.00037486482,0.001021681,0.99179786,0.00044814352],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036986507,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024585384,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.955128,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001537622,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00032915594,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998486},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7119558353","doi":"","title":"Private International Law in Common Law Canada: Cases, Text and Materials, 5th Edition","year":2022,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Casebook; Conflict of laws; Private law; Common law; Public law; Comparative law; Municipal law; Jurisdiction; Civil law (Civil law)","score_opus":0.01533587482708051,"score_gpt":0.2638613333295441,"score_spread":0.24852545850246358,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7119558353","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90341794,0.0007453988,0.0000057348316,0.010646073,0.009438429,0.0007369364,0.001287851,0.00006924017,0.07365241],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9923369,0.0002987963,0.000030354604,0.0039995364,0.0015132142,0.00010093465,0.00024938775,0.000031712305,0.0014391143],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99615663,0.0006565287,0.0007556185,0.0006181591,0.0011946091,0.0006184286],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987628,0.00016526075,0.0003333243,0.00030706622,0.000091152935,0.00034039724],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012333023,0.00030440872,0.00043734707,0.00007718534,0.0021672945,0.0005067851,0.00052192586,0.0001517786,0.006942764],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003418099,0.00037059007,0.00006736751,0.00033650157,0.00050304405,0.0007504412,0.0005202693,0.0006055841,0.00002519454],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001654439,0.00018035814,0.0013564256,0.00003004662,0.000049921906,0.00024132,0.0012340778,0.0000405635,0.0005826974,0.99158466,0.003533431,0.0010010742],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010344546,0.00016811641,0.0051948396,0.00007379837,0.000035915396,0.000046747893,0.0015232678,0.00006501018,0.00058070157,0.0074281055,0.9833978,0.00045127416],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9763417,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99138904,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98415655,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014934117,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005448247,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998746},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128193979","doi":"10.3138/ccar_v2i2_279","title":"Les Recours Collectifs Et Le Droit International Privé Au Québec","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Work (physics); Context (archaeology); Power (physics)","score_opus":0.05604269264827971,"score_gpt":0.36310665143519066,"score_spread":0.30706395878691095,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128193979","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007934786,0.007567085,0.0000720639,0.40524527,0.0011438346,0.0004622259,0.000022636297,0.00008189965,0.5774702],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8997733,0.057090383,0.00012653504,0.0101117855,0.0012634131,0.000077952966,0.000038472812,0.000022844064,0.031495336],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991217,0.000105008854,0.00019112027,0.00016235995,0.00019949213,0.00022026912],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993311,0.00004235412,0.000097493474,0.00011220861,0.00011353171,0.00030329044],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005676912,0.000076139186,0.00013224717,0.00010493356,0.0006066603,0.00007021926,0.00016420377,0.00006832197,0.0022056664],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00018390342,0.00008650252,0.00008578498,0.000229084,0.00006621395,0.00026129052,0.000006984182,0.00013503639,0.00012996276],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000024787576,0.000023463439,0.0019165656,0.00005612825,0.00003123112,0.0000023504722,0.0010856162,0.000007449953,0.00001271684,0.04337723,0.064293325,0.88919145],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000791868,0.00000609155,0.005024361,0.0002057908,0.000015326696,0.0000034578832,0.00023303408,0.000016418018,0.0000041529165,0.000021953068,0.9942941,0.00009612372],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96266776,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9993515,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9300008,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032262611,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0047432403,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99870646},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128195529","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v8i2.203","title":"A Real and Substantial Look at Jurisdiction in the Civil and Class Action Settings","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Centre de réadaptation Lethbridge-Layton-Mackay","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Supreme court; Original jurisdiction; Statutory law; Class action; Subject-matter jurisdiction; Action (physics); Class (philosophy); Civil procedure","score_opus":0.03344623111615447,"score_gpt":0.310251943957258,"score_spread":0.27680571284110356,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128195529","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.80276525,0.013281097,0.000014809039,0.0922933,0.0007911371,0.002182359,0.000017897855,0.00008964812,0.08856447],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8116154,0.18394099,0.000007766405,0.0030758898,0.00032217315,0.00010356844,0.000014863194,0.000012103999,0.0009072127],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986304,0.0003047777,0.00024922,0.00025741605,0.00024153314,0.0003166226],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992918,0.00008748744,0.00012771362,0.00014739129,0.00007361871,0.00027201747],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008782636,0.00012163822,0.00018672152,0.00012082104,0.00071394554,0.00015972058,0.00008841252,0.0001263449,0.000540698],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000067708905,0.00010426179,0.000046532285,0.00034031473,0.00015987332,0.00044515094,0.000012729147,0.00020866597,0.000049343147],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031666466,0.000062848485,0.020154733,0.0016008244,0.00006811523,0.000028118275,0.01597799,0.0000028336858,0.0019843485,0.022674954,0.21594606,0.7214675],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013553855,0.000020062243,0.048372246,0.00027369984,0.000037517686,0.000016879807,0.0010524818,0.00006662422,0.0000054428483,0.00008717384,0.94981056,0.00012176229],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.30160704,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8821338,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7338645,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00056836975,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00022256564,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7030436},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128215102","doi":"10.3138/ccar_v2i2_217","title":"Protecting Canadian Plaintiffs in International Class Actions: The Need for A Principled Approach in Light of <i>Currie V. Mcdonald’s Restaurants of Canada Ltd.</i>","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Plaintiff; Class (philosophy); World class; Class action; Government (linguistics)","score_opus":0.05043083678692827,"score_gpt":0.32353347706725993,"score_spread":0.27310264028033165,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128215102","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16325064,0.012245087,0.0001367219,0.4949408,0.003366259,0.013998597,0.00065948366,0.000058020534,0.31134441],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99492246,0.0025226674,0.000102447164,0.0013957963,0.0001914267,0.00028661508,0.000021162095,0.000013860759,0.0005435467],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982098,0.00022877227,0.0005902693,0.00022024315,0.00032645089,0.00042447983],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988387,0.00014620769,0.00029157667,0.0001934887,0.00022739294,0.00030263478],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001637781,0.00012186931,0.00029261564,0.0003217654,0.00034345116,0.000027282467,0.00031313565,0.00010025301,0.0001638253],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006925835,0.00011369974,0.000085284824,0.00070337835,0.000072007126,0.00019349948,0.000010208767,0.0002900702,9.077344e-7],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00032474357,0.00056318403,0.030542046,0.007194782,0.0005986603,0.000045852987,0.029165193,0.0038953628,0.0024569964,0.27365127,0.116887115,0.53467476],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026136395,0.0000079083675,0.003293791,0.00067213754,0.000015125734,0.000002616616,0.0015878651,0.00056210055,0.00005515291,0.000021122241,0.993407,0.00011378956],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9960347,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999796,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8765199,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030841457,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0073278467,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99829966},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128236326","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v6i2.431","title":"Certification Rates in Ontario Versus The Rest of Canada: Why the Disparity?","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Certification; Rest (music); Plaintiff; Consistency (knowledge bases); Class action; Common law; Action (physics)","score_opus":0.07727410158364759,"score_gpt":0.32370167984862935,"score_spread":0.24642757826498177,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128236326","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.29427227,0.0073925834,0.000005317364,0.5540799,0.006592915,0.0018123118,0.00002333189,0.000022279031,0.13579907],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9919567,0.004525816,0.0000029341843,0.0020581528,0.00011372947,0.000040428386,0.000007786605,0.0000045975685,0.0012898603],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99919313,0.00013355924,0.00019302634,0.00010339966,0.00019148058,0.00018539996],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99929345,0.00014566026,0.00010736548,0.0002346438,0.00008847322,0.00013039584],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007874207,0.000056366636,0.00010488156,0.000029237533,0.00044974056,0.000034302742,0.0002100208,0.000046508572,0.00068451575],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00030058168,0.000037705944,0.00003584051,0.0002717549,0.0001246977,0.00008950865,0.0000056561166,0.00029785637,0.000004695903],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000064307016,0.00006723686,0.071554855,0.00043151242,0.00009649023,0.000009952108,0.008517447,0.000028031782,0.0007250055,0.2988893,0.4581272,0.16148865],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000042615786,0.0000030244732,0.12936296,0.000068340276,0.000014139337,3.1941016e-7,0.00020850086,0.0000056541057,0.000008342968,0.000029038922,0.87021756,0.00003952777],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9997977,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9999998,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6976844,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007772825,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004336915,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7693501},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128627543","doi":"10.26180/10064861","title":"Between a Rock and a Softer Place: Cartel Settlements in Australia and Canada","year":2019,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"Monash University","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cartel; Discretion; Settlement (finance); Adversarial system; Human settlement; Damages; Incentive","score_opus":0.013101811094637275,"score_gpt":0.2296237614134693,"score_spread":0.21652195031883203,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128627543","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99581355,0.00003777409,0.0000027126757,0.0011110106,0.00018868427,0.00025992555,0.0001207595,0.0000070095366,0.0024585705],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98232496,0.00008567405,0.000006443859,0.000044970166,0.00004850964,1.1878294e-7,0.0000058730666,0.000003818732,0.017479641],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99886626,0.000107006446,0.0001154362,0.00032095367,0.00027375662,0.00031659138],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995384,0.0000635122,0.00006765333,0.00009829757,0.000034424298,0.00019766665],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00018934354,0.00012866435,0.00020318349,0.0000729103,0.00026999894,0.00004293561,0.00011606928,0.0001261635,0.0003575531],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000005365063,0.00016252564,0.000023418466,0.00016832931,0.00007534972,0.00026131832,0.00014989998,0.00017188059,0.000009879498],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033391378,0.000014365476,0.9911122,0.000024191933,0.000029310853,0.000027950604,0.006162161,0.0000063745174,0.000013673397,0.00019075467,0.0013656879,0.0010199383],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008861744,0.000050057904,0.73546624,0.000033526314,0.00004025754,4.473161e-7,0.005598115,0.00009226085,0.0000056312,0.000022510007,0.25762996,0.00017482435],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9443649,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9485464,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.25626427,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00046312905,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003448963,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6627604},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128636332","doi":"10.26180/10064861.v1","title":"Between a Rock and a Softer Place: Cartel Settlements in Australia and Canada","year":2019,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"Monash University","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cartel; Discretion; Settlement (finance); Adversarial system; Human settlement; Damages; Incentive","score_opus":0.013101811094637275,"score_gpt":0.2296237614134693,"score_spread":0.21652195031883203,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128636332","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.99581355,0.00003777409,0.0000027126757,0.0011110106,0.00018868427,0.00025992555,0.0001207595,0.0000070095366,0.0024585705],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98232496,0.00008567405,0.000006443859,0.000044970166,0.00004850964,1.1878294e-7,0.0000058730666,0.000003818732,0.017479641],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99886626,0.000107006446,0.0001154362,0.00032095367,0.00027375662,0.00031659138],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995384,0.0000635122,0.00006765333,0.00009829757,0.000034424298,0.00019766665],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00018934354,0.00012866435,0.00020318349,0.0000729103,0.00026999894,0.00004293561,0.00011606928,0.0001261635,0.0003575531],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000005365063,0.00016252564,0.000023418466,0.00016832931,0.00007534972,0.00026131832,0.00014989998,0.00017188059,0.000009879498],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033391378,0.000014365476,0.9911122,0.000024191933,0.000029310853,0.000027950604,0.006162161,0.0000063745174,0.000013673397,0.00019075467,0.0013656879,0.0010199383],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008861744,0.000050057904,0.73546624,0.000033526314,0.00004025754,4.473161e-7,0.005598115,0.00009226085,0.0000056312,0.000022510007,0.25762996,0.00017482435],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9443649,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9485464,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.25626427,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00046312905,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003448963,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6627604},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7132370321","doi":"","title":"INHERITANCE RIGHTS OF SPOUSES AND UNMARRIED PARTNERS IN CROATIA","year":2018,"lang":"hr","type":"dissertation","venue":"Repository of the University of Rijeka","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Quarter (Canadian coin); Inheritance (genetic algorithm)","score_opus":0.011614167757941746,"score_gpt":0.2513796961892894,"score_spread":0.23976552843134766,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7132370321","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9787158,0.00035741943,0.000003252572,0.000076689386,0.0006028817,0.00023310892,0.000012650115,0.0000075190965,0.019990701],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.990027,0.00026320372,0.00010240544,0.0000024627227,0.000050638213,5.6609775e-8,0.000004280892,0.0000059781387,0.009543946],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986412,0.00023775683,0.0003239457,0.00024739423,0.0004008844,0.00014879998],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99838424,0.00009247629,0.0009209468,0.00026684024,0.00027851088,0.00005698509],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00027774135,0.000150069,0.00041956053,0.000117865886,0.00049717893,0.000008114234,0.0004264742,0.0002793113,0.00004426379],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000028936523,0.00014662661,0.00016844869,0.00029394298,0.0013263143,0.00015282488,0.00006373557,0.000144167,9.670262e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0026293998,0.0008245505,0.18245277,0.0020299123,0.0006631014,0.000038621707,0.719185,0.00006539587,0.0789091,0.0083417,0.0024127061,0.0024477725],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0016516817,0.00044040687,0.8073366,0.0028709765,0.000592143,0.000003820596,0.07970365,0.00010353214,0.04209427,0.0005507918,0.06409602,0.00055610266],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02447003,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015867127,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6394813,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00008512833,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024068655,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9820261},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7132439577","doi":"","title":"Marriage - changes in family law and civil registry","year":2021,"lang":"hr","type":"dissertation","venue":"Repository Faculty of Law University of Zagreb","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Face (sociological concept); Value (mathematics); Quarter (Canadian coin)","score_opus":0.02082760070460423,"score_gpt":0.2601412566809708,"score_spread":0.23931365597636658,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7132439577","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.75760704,0.0008146879,0.000002546168,0.0002257259,0.0005036124,0.0002437033,0.00012535346,0.000021274163,0.24045607],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.975977,0.0012361533,0.00010369477,0.00004096419,0.000117427044,5.206146e-8,0.00031574734,0.000014825646,0.022194145],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99780273,0.00028027082,0.00037662836,0.000571146,0.00067042775,0.00029877044],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99819374,0.00010706591,0.0008098039,0.00032161837,0.0004093201,0.00015847961],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00036120688,0.00028818077,0.00074198085,0.00011573862,0.0006683254,0.00005292508,0.00037605723,0.000673158,0.00008832178],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001886249,0.00037790305,0.00023039925,0.000268236,0.0010098147,0.00026827623,0.00010910234,0.00033723304,0.0000020200353],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0016042009,0.0012450852,0.0051472904,0.004173033,0.00097560394,0.0013505494,0.7072132,0.00003341227,0.12203329,0.15119123,0.0013824565,0.0036505947],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0026197184,0.00066013273,0.07218667,0.003633429,0.00075674243,0.000023129725,0.6082217,0.000059607704,0.009790073,0.00022225172,0.30061865,0.0012078639],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13106814,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.22720234,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2992362,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016198872,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00028027673,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99986726},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7132490994","doi":"","title":"COMPULSORY CIVIL MARRIAGE IN THE REPUBLIC OF CROATIA FROM 1946 TO 1998","year":2016,"lang":"hr","type":"dissertation","venue":"Repository of the University of Rijeka","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"The Republic; Quarter (Canadian coin); Russian federation","score_opus":0.01058440772219309,"score_gpt":0.22746208628574155,"score_spread":0.21687767856354845,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7132490994","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9565525,0.00021974141,0.000028595336,0.0009887744,0.0012464725,0.00048687923,0.00008211482,0.000010927072,0.04038401],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9881507,0.0001242776,0.00005231714,0.000027547538,0.000149494,1.9947898e-7,0.000021077867,0.000009789503,0.011464587],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973431,0.00077993737,0.00047311053,0.00034815018,0.0008382154,0.00021745403],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974244,0.00043039297,0.0011302094,0.0006961245,0.00024341774,0.00007544273],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006610757,0.0002012064,0.00051045616,0.00019000129,0.00066984905,0.000020110949,0.0015543324,0.0003132494,0.00013384577],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007567362,0.00015244745,0.0004204634,0.00046099437,0.0005998085,0.00016489455,0.00015460952,0.00024883854,0.000008940719],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.001571039,0.0010196888,0.051342584,0.0005681668,0.00070142624,0.000042610674,0.82727665,0.000100975114,0.092410535,0.0030828686,0.011936958,0.009946524],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0010685362,0.00025498687,0.8034276,0.0019805506,0.00044846575,0.0000019034964,0.095766395,0.000040557672,0.006429337,0.0003953,0.08978558,0.000400813],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.056708436,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013256551,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.752085,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00016054502,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00029992347,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.94957304},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7132994659","doi":"","title":"Globalization, federalism and Canadian private international law","year":2003,"lang":"","type":"dissertation","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; State (computer science); Negotiation; Conflict of laws; Convention; International law; Globalization; Enforcement; Comity","score_opus":0.015460998178530331,"score_gpt":0.3394112510056028,"score_spread":0.3239502528270725,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7132994659","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10219602,0.0009013505,0.00006728182,0.009014698,0.0056226,0.0005214282,0.000028262884,0.000051382838,0.881597],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7799131,0.0033322019,0.0001525999,0.002190145,0.0006467937,0.000024187033,0.0007248452,0.00004628379,0.21296984],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99784553,0.00016010008,0.0003574649,0.0005268872,0.0005995331,0.0005104603],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99853504,0.00003179167,0.00028287998,0.00018311419,0.00040420314,0.00056300097],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00040886484,0.00031920636,0.00027681582,0.00016579505,0.0017867291,0.00078716874,0.00028873663,0.00052082003,0.0026140446],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009031004,0.00038450444,0.00008990173,0.00034154108,0.00022500298,0.00029090376,0.000020994592,0.0002405567,0.000075439966],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022544462,0.000031483378,0.0014923256,0.000033240933,0.00011506594,0.0000108147515,0.08340011,0.000008949457,0.000059623108,0.9097591,0.0028012234,0.0022655006],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00030809187,0.00002760984,0.0031835572,0.00009769586,0.00006362934,0.0000033816266,0.012466099,0.00009170511,0.000055960398,0.0019504362,0.9813413,0.00041053194],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.73532814,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8954571,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97854006,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00043868946,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00072712917,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998607},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7133028849","doi":"","title":"Child support obligations of step-parents in Canada","year":2006,"lang":"","type":"dissertation","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; Library and Archives Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Child support; Discretion; De facto; Family law; Child custody; Common law","score_opus":0.012635887259745819,"score_gpt":0.3243500185046148,"score_spread":0.311714131244869,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7133028849","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7679331,0.00031116564,0.000007323574,0.0007671155,0.0015590573,0.00048909045,0.000047710662,0.000012074856,0.22887342],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9681311,0.0002986057,0.000022213959,0.00004668542,0.00018260082,0.000024997677,0.00056179985,0.000022963559,0.030709034],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971892,0.00013193225,0.0007629762,0.00040389036,0.0010304692,0.00048148347],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99855924,0.00006389263,0.0007030404,0.00026241736,0.00025833826,0.00015305927],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00032059028,0.00028511594,0.00049942936,0.0002239833,0.00038044533,0.000042534117,0.0003387529,0.00027055547,0.0012746585],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005145645,0.00034518357,0.00012804585,0.0009315998,0.000090730195,0.0001312659,0.00002341616,0.00037247108,0.000014806111],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002688984,0.0013923777,0.48228174,0.0010127804,0.00036385318,0.000093004885,0.40556479,0.0017335329,0.00055627426,0.013043402,0.042304736,0.051384613],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007913965,0.00009863147,0.70544195,0.0007152796,0.00013576714,9.3625016e-7,0.14481279,0.00023708722,0.000535384,0.00006517424,0.14650324,0.00066233537],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99882656,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99972,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.260752,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008214161,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006287304,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99990004},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7133419607","doi":"","title":"Allocation of Cases Based on Geography","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"CityU Scholars","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Plaintiff; Mainland; Focus (optics); Mainland China; Section (typography)","score_opus":0.030827481323398364,"score_gpt":0.29926273200423925,"score_spread":0.2684352506808409,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7133419607","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0020615545,0.0006684613,0.000015083316,0.0008281008,0.00070434384,0.00024513324,0.00006180003,0.00010395801,0.99531156],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.60071176,0.00066798157,0.00008470765,0.0004958715,0.00071137084,0.000014701733,0.000102169535,0.000059546077,0.3971519],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987604,0.000028060209,0.00022216873,0.00027466542,0.0005714813,0.00014320221],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99923736,0.00012390451,0.00013656598,0.0002449043,0.0001665498,0.000090731184],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00051669404,0.00015355859,0.00019543676,0.00035110526,0.0002166009,0.00013270749,0.0001773005,0.0003233989,0.0007842699],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007916622,0.00016144682,0.00024117956,0.00008866411,0.00021631323,0.00011816489,0.000021694788,0.00039810978,0.00014238249],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028954564,0.000035356286,0.00021057246,0.00007797097,0.00006443792,0.000038542814,0.00044498086,0.000022441001,0.000026686741,0.9789877,0.0012725631,0.018789804],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008378941,0.00008943874,0.00041479294,0.0003672292,0.00008673231,6.330533e-7,0.000031810683,0.000023721374,0.00002164701,0.012272384,0.98643553,0.00017226963],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006439165,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00044449925,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.985163,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000079273166,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00015555692,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8587205},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7135223398","doi":"10.18572/2072-4152-2025-7-32-37","title":"A CONFLICT OF INTERESTS IN THE PRACTICE OF LAW (A COMPARATIVE LAW STUDY)","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"Justice of the peace","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Settlement (finance); Comparative law; Supreme court; Practice of law; Common law; Conflict of laws; Legal profession","score_opus":0.07092890673757644,"score_gpt":0.41910300291284786,"score_spread":0.3481740961752714,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7135223398","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4963884,0.0015737063,0.00004328918,0.01000493,0.0011999726,0.0016049388,0.000036745303,0.000007894994,0.48914012],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99799347,0.00021963048,0.000040053517,0.00062134414,0.000071838534,0.000014108277,5.445543e-7,0.0000052846553,0.0010337097],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957257,0.002142664,0.0008793229,0.00026135938,0.00074032584,0.00025062324],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99448603,0.00325265,0.0010460252,0.00063722185,0.0005437653,0.00003428498],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030675365,0.0001846826,0.0005526249,0.00007127404,0.00036124716,0.000051006256,0.0012131877,0.00011444672,0.000044878157],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006964052,0.00012404894,0.00019145687,0.0009850431,0.0016294415,0.0002920396,0.00031659452,0.0004426462,0.0000029609225],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00043064816,0.002114612,0.00030670303,0.00028308944,0.00020891502,0.0000018744612,0.42965475,0.00014584519,0.00045196817,0.56528157,0.0008978719,0.00022219216],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015782034,0.0007689422,0.007005142,0.00089790666,0.0025257913,0.0000017027734,0.67674756,0.00036632162,0.0020495886,0.0006699937,0.3072023,0.00018654321],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.033863585,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.032490622,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.56461155,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006992552,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00024185069,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9851639},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7135605321","doi":"","title":"The parties know better - some comments on the dispute resolution provisions in the draft AB 18","year":2018,"lang":"da","type":"article","venue":"Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen)","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institute on Governance","funders":"","keywords":"Dispute resolution; Online dispute resolution; Alternative dispute resolution; Dispute mechanism; Legislation; Dispute board","score_opus":0.0785568585040894,"score_gpt":0.33115284339705836,"score_spread":0.25259598489296897,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7135605321","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5746414,0.0042468198,0.00010645047,0.11789513,0.00039124364,0.0031167867,0.0001765222,0.000033970897,0.29939172],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7275216,0.0024769923,0.000015270976,0.00025689573,0.00015283863,7.181314e-7,0.000014741819,0.000012940939,0.26954803],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99048954,0.005446291,0.00031067402,0.00053872674,0.0021881058,0.0010266341],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9940824,0.0033120678,0.000412393,0.0013162148,0.00067993294,0.0001970137],"candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.008808429,0.00027828675,0.00039384814,0.00017645748,0.013824148,0.00022463713,0.0041527334,0.0002363948,0.08712557],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00027998217,0.00018647138,0.00033156417,0.0015269686,0.0076974137,0.0008019886,0.0015984762,0.0009756415,0.025913298],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010359113,0.00024259927,0.000019346315,0.000024741377,0.00016579799,0.000031908436,0.049377948,0.000010918504,0.0002900762,0.0060095955,0.9369273,0.0058638486],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008126679,0.0006481199,0.012900365,0.0001812141,0.0000984867,0.0000012097978,0.08655095,0.0006045802,0.00015705913,0.000114067145,0.8977462,0.00018509146],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012672923,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.028684864,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1528802,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00060712354,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006075147,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99500304},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7138825029","doi":"","title":"La fin des avouées et avoués, et après… La reconfiguration du marché des causes d’appel en droit de la famille","year":2025,"lang":"fr","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Independence (probability theory); Power (physics); Class (philosophy); Order (exchange)","score_opus":0.03425846064433743,"score_gpt":0.3007004093995047,"score_spread":0.2664419487551673,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7138825029","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02095889,0.0013703818,0.0033408098,0.003923167,0.00047191602,0.00045109316,0.00013044824,0.00024167215,0.9691116],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3678779,0.055238172,0.0022668573,0.00092991296,0.0005472577,0.000058284444,0.000114716146,0.000075489384,0.5728914],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99581915,0.0018768244,0.0006078906,0.0006451034,0.00050703046,0.00054400705],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99481374,0.004071009,0.00026487286,0.00030612646,0.00031900854,0.00022526078],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003828488,0.0005277861,0.0005495767,0.0002690788,0.0009683969,0.00052710186,0.00041942074,0.0012545263,0.00363606],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00079351576,0.0005499245,0.00034653148,0.00017634722,0.0023903206,0.00054589997,0.00016134544,0.0008748739,0.00016803629],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003230834,0.00007932653,0.0014848129,0.00017176522,0.00014080037,0.000035134723,0.013837617,0.000018629844,0.000099579185,0.831824,0.002720993,0.14955503],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00035394594,0.00010034232,0.014695375,0.0008333607,0.00015994303,0.000026922386,0.0026020727,0.00010685554,0.00014284562,0.10141405,0.87900984,0.0005544225],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01943395,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.051133767,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8762889,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005191039,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009256808,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99969524},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7143407263","doi":"10.70675/6bd01173z67ebz4a5ezb3c9zed5eebf49e2b","title":"Le droit de l'OHADA face au commerce électronique","year":2011,"lang":"","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Face (sociological concept); Context (archaeology); Legal certainty","score_opus":0.017947021489239854,"score_gpt":0.30360834222223504,"score_spread":0.28566132073299516,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7143407263","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19652472,0.00021184789,0.004902225,0.00085169275,0.0011651132,0.00065721484,0.0000089642745,0.00016073127,0.7955175],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.76903605,0.001128526,0.0001264134,0.00036909393,0.00042819913,0.00005426694,0.00016504928,0.000046687368,0.2286457],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966479,0.00037773757,0.000616817,0.0006633446,0.00057269895,0.0011214901],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983334,0.00013300228,0.00045302874,0.00039649627,0.00026044348,0.00042363472],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011017954,0.00045223473,0.0005330096,0.00013996585,0.002035005,0.000208338,0.000715752,0.0009919016,0.003188568],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006406538,0.0005339469,0.00038475267,0.00043233435,0.0002739917,0.00039845836,0.000049107293,0.00076736434,0.00023046928],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019431718,0.0005069948,0.0023534563,0.00011378777,0.00019724508,0.000005667099,0.21714363,0.0000064369406,0.0010896657,0.73929393,0.0015049347,0.03758994],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00086225884,0.00054826576,0.03497169,0.00023958946,0.00031280896,0.0000061412734,0.12098255,0.00033269165,0.009606987,0.016348062,0.81402373,0.0017652039],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.48420385,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4211026,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.81251884,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005710598,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0055585452,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997112},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7144397256","doi":"","title":"Gian Paolo Romano, Le dilemme du renvoi en droit international privé : la thèse, l'antithèse et la recherche d'une synthèse","year":2021,"lang":"ja","type":"article","venue":"Institutional Repositories DataBase (IRDB)","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Privy Council Office","funders":"","keywords":"Work (physics); Order (exchange); Context (archaeology)","score_opus":0.06579056865118027,"score_gpt":0.35512208077832247,"score_spread":0.2893315121271422,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7144397256","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.27262533,0.002931734,0.008847687,0.058984313,0.031407565,0.001120703,0.00491512,0.00077782857,0.6183897],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96746784,0.0046144663,0.0059388834,0.0005501103,0.0059315218,0.000094031406,0.0026277343,0.0000632073,0.012712218],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9923057,0.0030621109,0.0010008179,0.0011844507,0.0018073188,0.00063960196],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99383754,0.003136646,0.0004662507,0.0008858944,0.0012364022,0.00043728866],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0047656237,0.0005250403,0.00054123683,0.00019142605,0.0017479982,0.0013446436,0.000953959,0.0008389762,0.00051266246],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009450386,0.0005904985,0.00036231463,0.0011001861,0.0014635179,0.0025768308,0.0008373316,0.0014528903,0.00017537933],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002984301,0.0014521916,0.004535438,0.00013667824,0.00060748635,0.0030329437,0.014195461,0.00009655559,0.00687016,0.95015246,0.0144968275,0.0041253944],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009904129,0.000054512813,0.010064278,0.0007069633,0.00016129717,0.000539454,0.0032454615,0.00019533026,0.0027156477,0.001653986,0.9789922,0.0006804436],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011146418,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007947001,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96449536,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010798993,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0052192905,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996921},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7153400476","doi":"","title":"Droit français - droit québécois inspirations mutuelles","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"TRIPS architecture; Human rights; Confidentiality","score_opus":0.011333802927681142,"score_gpt":0.23084454358820178,"score_spread":0.21951074066052065,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7153400476","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0023397733,0.0014152201,0.008055326,0.0066215564,0.00047492265,0.0006917198,0.000087988796,0.00038076512,0.9799327],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0446991,0.0017401272,0.0013670761,0.00025978094,0.00018901752,0.000048750415,0.000502594,0.000079078534,0.9511145],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9951202,0.0021408014,0.0006024745,0.00073943107,0.00090947817,0.00048757176],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9941787,0.001443504,0.00055347866,0.0015506537,0.0019981447,0.00027549156],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0044531045,0.00035223618,0.0004661725,0.00029448207,0.0013274441,0.000483994,0.0012022279,0.0006165157,0.0016358094],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00085908273,0.00043366425,0.0003555361,0.00037931465,0.0005965222,0.00034153034,0.00027608717,0.0006301213,0.0008199893],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000056704384,0.00019613747,0.00029032282,0.000056810582,0.00007725517,0.000003477305,0.05148709,0.0000035394266,0.00007228734,0.88345736,0.016650293,0.04769976],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000331097,6.760975e-7,0.00062597776,0.00070973474,0.00007111321,0.0000018026217,0.00044254752,0.0002131933,0.00023681755,0.0103524085,0.9865516,0.00046303414],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04506208,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.23601589,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9699013,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00047948532,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019475141,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999727},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7161773259","doi":"10.82308/34131","title":"Jurisdictional fairness and freezing measures : an analysis in Canadian private international law","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Conflict of laws; Scope (computer science); Subject-matter jurisdiction; Exclusive jurisdiction","score_opus":0.0148599611187937,"score_gpt":0.30814532722215227,"score_spread":0.2932853661033586,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7161773259","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6107175,0.00013844112,0.000074655145,0.0010377567,0.0010402004,0.00023155124,0.000044477634,0.00007347949,0.38664192],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99341524,0.00019361523,0.00009005632,0.000118491065,0.0003017655,0.00002001689,0.0009284123,0.000013892735,0.0049185134],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99833864,0.00008312348,0.00028606443,0.00037623226,0.000581097,0.00033486725],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99924165,0.000025346853,0.00010209769,0.00011724818,0.0001808358,0.00033279794],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006511764,0.00016358851,0.00023743826,0.0008490001,0.0005009518,0.0002778496,0.00023762853,0.00032751047,0.00069119554],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003335005,0.00018077124,0.00009663714,0.0005262971,0.00008877984,0.00041714974,0.000009260937,0.00022696619,0.000005412148],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003248851,0.000058363534,0.071507975,0.0000115663515,0.0003429768,0.000016309688,0.022850439,0.00027450558,0.000041009967,0.89737797,0.000018315197,0.007468105],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00061726506,0.00004059447,0.69407696,0.00011330087,0.00047081657,0.0000012490765,0.013432868,0.0006173372,0.00007625051,0.017209573,0.27255842,0.00078537635],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96434045,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9996293,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8801684,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007578519,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009246942,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7568106},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7161849637","doi":"10.82308/31648","title":"A new pair of glasses for conflicts of jurisdiction in Brazil: seeing the principle of proximity with Canadian lenses","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Conflict of laws; Jurisdiction; International arbitration; Good faith; Lien","score_opus":0.02630039433654809,"score_gpt":0.3395459626128943,"score_spread":0.31324556827634625,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7161849637","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9790831,0.00009147222,0.00006208835,0.0005233877,0.0002887908,0.001399884,0.00004788323,0.000038012837,0.018465357],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9812847,0.00012223568,0.00022681328,0.0000183267,0.0000922557,0.000053772623,0.00010163376,0.000023464592,0.018076804],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986323,0.000071994706,0.000445525,0.000195942,0.00041261347,0.00024161187],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986165,0.0002558782,0.0004656403,0.00016696872,0.0004021437,0.00009288064],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006964488,0.00013464695,0.00035312484,0.00027838344,0.0001651018,0.00001842054,0.00019450887,0.00022437159,0.000047471218],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00020749915,0.00010118733,0.000098257,0.0005445362,0.00009578964,0.00013005605,0.000007726545,0.00012135293,5.598386e-7],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.002300287,0.00051956915,0.21428844,0.0048219482,0.0009854552,0.000008198678,0.42354771,0.00029062122,0.004596266,0.27205077,0.00385776,0.07273297],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0017131885,0.0010039749,0.6192369,0.0019927707,0.0003681719,7.089925e-7,0.04448429,0.00020438105,0.024836997,0.0013608298,0.30420142,0.00059637835],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7358812,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9819203,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.40494844,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00010239819,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025052659,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.44442344},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7161953416","doi":"10.82308/39830","title":"Droit international privé et cyberespace: fondements d'une approche renouvelée","year":2013,"lang":"fr","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cyberspace; Conflict of laws; Jurisdiction; Private law; Context (archaeology); Choice of law; International law; Field (mathematics)","score_opus":0.019317125600591668,"score_gpt":0.3206740955609809,"score_spread":0.30135696996038924,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7161953416","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19642314,0.00021369962,0.0014012117,0.010479519,0.006681733,0.00082323473,0.000022588174,0.00014180204,0.78381306],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2528651,0.0013238087,0.0020324718,0.0008279911,0.0010425479,0.00015981942,0.0012549732,0.00005381329,0.7404395],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968027,0.00017831207,0.00061520253,0.0006584668,0.0012374086,0.00050792866],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99831444,0.00012648916,0.0005167197,0.00027613633,0.00052099454,0.00024520903],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00064816105,0.00039665008,0.00037218357,0.00018987647,0.00054715795,0.00036808077,0.0006758136,0.000661748,0.012333584],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00013053541,0.00041696857,0.00025494804,0.00048549176,0.00019553283,0.00071497523,0.000083908206,0.00050656754,0.001595094],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006560935,0.00050875737,0.0014548884,0.00008162464,0.00045718453,0.0000052287946,0.10403947,0.000020858266,0.0014981929,0.79519594,0.030257514,0.06641476],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005992121,0.00010356133,0.0123614855,0.00019045512,0.00011588839,0.0000017063512,0.035463065,0.00055836095,0.0003538165,0.0061245095,0.94354624,0.0005817315],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.026554862,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019559314,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9132887,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003615132,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00047437783,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998282},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7162512094","doi":"10.5749/9781452954684-014","title":"Conclusion. A Land Claim Is Canada’S Claim","year":2010,"lang":"","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of Minnesota Press eBooks","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"","score_opus":0.02215871185098925,"score_gpt":0.21478694123489978,"score_spread":0.19262822938391053,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7162512094","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008778294,0.00038866422,0.000039178874,0.0017408152,0.0014035613,0.0007549848,0.00078900036,0.00004952589,0.98605597],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.113043636,0.0018040583,0.00015472903,0.00030965687,0.0005285612,3.7317818e-7,0.000035918576,0.000052068037,0.884071],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99666727,0.000109215536,0.00049323885,0.0008306881,0.0012856114,0.0006139722],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969457,0.0002182293,0.0009042312,0.000732303,0.00066092616,0.0005386455],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00038798564,0.00056906324,0.0008895122,0.00016753806,0.0025716533,0.00007981338,0.0012064152,0.0012957619,0.0043953336],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001924518,0.0007166304,0.00041859422,0.000022621203,0.00231165,0.0001596322,0.00072833605,0.0010704758,0.000018919747],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0020754621,0.00026270372,0.00074667507,0.0007327681,0.002050792,0.0015599396,0.1800648,0.000006452361,0.001512294,0.6604822,0.071488984,0.07901688],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001041575,0.00013663943,0.00010862669,0.00024660182,0.00044872708,0.000008448854,0.0011785846,0.000035674228,0.0002622115,0.0004394293,0.9953977,0.0006958051],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.94650805,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9667689,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9239087,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003102111,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031889412,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99952847},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W751935596","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.2822","title":"Book Review: Property and Sovereignty: Legal and Cultural Perspectives, by James Charles Smith (ed)","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sovereignty; Property (philosophy); Cultural property; Law; Law and economics; Sociology; Political science; Environmental ethics; Philosophy; Epistemology; Cultural heritage","score_opus":0.018785126942324343,"score_gpt":0.2842859793379544,"score_spread":0.26550085239563004,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W751935596","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0006843464,0.6003939,0.000012676809,0.017836083,0.0001266322,0.0001768412,0.000008413269,0.000032553668,0.38072854],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.30974513,0.6579958,0.00018930198,0.006189047,0.0010401197,0.000009452379,0.000003575632,0.000021456606,0.024806062],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99869424,0.00019117039,0.00019937727,0.00020612316,0.00042990196,0.00027918618],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99910945,0.000021794584,0.00013748222,0.0000782017,0.0002529014,0.00040016478],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00076172274,0.00013841552,0.00022420548,0.00003255557,0.0009071242,0.00043635024,0.00012159692,0.00007528798,0.0003502865],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009370548,0.000087392735,0.00005524608,0.00009196892,0.00040904596,0.0010287504,0.00004526114,0.0002769543,0.000008572581],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004406761,0.00006433752,0.00022765448,0.000045251458,0.00005225037,0.000021816037,0.009581089,1.657245e-7,0.000036259218,0.18734114,0.78734416,0.015241796],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00044281638,0.00011077629,0.0000834907,0.00025794536,0.000041993375,0.00015184029,0.006348671,0.0000070539986,0.00001452548,0.001166927,0.9912142,0.00015975318],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023835555,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0034726753,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3559225,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000103554084,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00014073939,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9826648},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W770072493","doi":"10.1093/9780198727255.001.0001","title":"The International Protection of Adults","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Commonwealth; Jurisdiction; Conflict of laws; Convention; Work (physics); Common law; Political science; Law; Engineering","score_opus":0.03187358128743832,"score_gpt":0.2944128736517059,"score_spread":0.26253929236426754,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W770072493","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000028096201,0.000079344194,0.000052436248,0.002255212,0.0011856735,0.00023005041,0.0000040250434,0.000029741424,0.9961354],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0019774956,0.0002484377,0.000013095346,0.000019875792,0.00088850356,0.000011120682,0.0000066422895,0.000004651555,0.99683017],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992199,0.000023053803,0.00012569918,0.000077365745,0.0004883398,0.00006562372],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99938595,0.00003346268,0.00013120426,0.00008014009,0.00033938777,0.000029865854],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00056576234,0.00004569704,0.000060474857,0.000027617263,0.00016722205,0.000038294947,0.0002046834,0.00012126328,0.00026966716],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008905697,0.000031192303,0.000049206323,0.000024332461,0.00012831367,0.00004660546,0.000026953076,0.00009657264,0.000034988734],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000074187905,0.000016483815,0.000009038511,0.000008786278,0.000052039417,4.100787e-7,0.00584563,5.4756407e-7,0.0000053042454,0.40067014,0.36215705,0.23116039],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006629221,0.000021853528,0.000013600329,0.000029040253,0.000004575101,1.4601096e-7,0.0003599476,0.000013683993,0.000005801978,0.008771588,0.9906767,0.00003676165],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0020697599,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0076336563,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.62851965,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00017291293,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005530909,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42597592},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W77547115","doi":"","title":"Futile or fruitful: the charter and the decision to withhold or withdraw life-sustaining treatment.","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PubMed","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statute; Charter; Directive; Law; Health care; Best interests; Medicine; Political science","score_opus":0.040946052541163555,"score_gpt":0.29802132205878523,"score_spread":0.25707526951762166,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W77547115","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7937047,0.00045272848,0.00028203573,0.1351293,0.0006305093,0.0040377406,0.0000072048324,0.00018252313,0.06557329],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98462254,0.00018933043,0.00003526947,0.0031579782,0.0005293544,0.00044415228,5.183756e-7,0.0000062858862,0.011014578],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99893975,0.00010478596,0.00014357037,0.00018449622,0.00027392866,0.00035343863],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991697,0.00035815904,0.000053189706,0.00019228354,0.000043100037,0.00018358749],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008704906,0.00010044319,0.00014061676,0.00003578667,0.0008632994,0.00026316842,0.00017335602,0.000050557534,0.0000961194],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003495248,0.00004027401,0.00004267067,0.0002732668,0.00016364841,0.000137476,0.000025884188,0.00006428947,0.000008879181],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010108436,0.000032916254,0.0004733359,6.561942e-7,0.00001958963,0.000004857204,0.028049974,0.000002221953,9.311502e-7,0.004526264,0.0025510676,0.96332735],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0015296114,0.00015938457,0.13058202,0.000008167331,0.000044204153,0.0000034342186,0.0068580983,0.000036429898,0.000010205439,0.0008184983,0.8598373,0.000112639376],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007050192,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027266263,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9632147,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000065806875,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008036252,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6639888},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W77558344","doi":"","title":"Chronique de droit international privé canadien","year":2010,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Journal du droit international","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.008449559125953647,"score_gpt":0.2758843348218272,"score_spread":0.2674347756958736,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W77558344","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.49463692,0.00023791648,0.0027097613,0.10233177,0.05283403,0.0001590722,0.000094612566,0.00005618852,0.3469397],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86331874,0.0019952066,0.0013280284,0.0014000254,0.025031747,0.000013020725,0.000031547694,0.000037766622,0.10684391],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99713355,0.00011704979,0.00064420607,0.0003174579,0.0011577143,0.0006300279],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977715,0.00014440171,0.00049838907,0.00016872697,0.0007975076,0.00061947136],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017644996,0.00022903731,0.00022009488,0.0002949669,0.0006259113,0.00067985884,0.0012291847,0.00037245514,0.01760399],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00050334824,0.00027881443,0.0003196053,0.00020377566,0.0004119063,0.0011211234,0.000116660805,0.0015413625,0.00029893572],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010651331,0.00048155888,0.030165784,0.000012334748,0.00057115353,0.0005268015,0.0077960254,0.00013121105,0.0016187455,0.8102738,0.048218686,0.100097336],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00066332996,0.00009944385,0.023170156,0.00009859524,0.000043410444,0.001994743,0.00035480622,0.0039021862,0.00010912609,0.03799349,0.9312811,0.00028962462],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006950966,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.036344353,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8830624,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027190612,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001169744,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999664},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W77651103","doi":"","title":"Gracefulness of n-cone Cm v Kcn.","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ars Combinatoria","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematics; Cone (formal languages); Pure mathematics; Combinatorics; Algorithm","score_opus":0.017482517811680212,"score_gpt":0.28205087288481795,"score_spread":0.26456835507313775,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W77651103","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.82638675,0.00014811772,0.000015458369,0.00037527393,0.0021210676,0.00011287571,0.0000012341675,0.000045008575,0.1707942],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99842495,0.00003948713,0.000036647805,0.000038176862,0.000011239727,0.0000069483017,9.1135365e-7,0.0000067214446,0.0014349428],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991122,0.00014546383,0.00015738132,0.00012161259,0.00027318564,0.0001901939],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994822,0.0000832918,0.00008235335,0.00015941025,0.00011313434,0.000079585116],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006117358,0.0000639494,0.00013227548,0.000043671305,0.00023718979,0.000022473989,0.00013188437,0.00007757586,0.00027594238],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00019065653,0.000067086505,0.000056015484,0.00027969942,0.00014400936,0.0001231845,0.000013366602,0.00007531705,0.000032188247],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000041953344,0.00007137282,0.005285687,0.000004370354,0.000008863017,0.0000014391562,0.0023694898,4.4413477e-7,0.00013141392,0.98972183,0.0006292495,0.0017716695],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006771635,0.00007006613,0.0047622854,0.000015675825,0.000018036882,7.9347853e-7,0.0014136583,0.0000036615843,0.0047109495,0.49815044,0.49002042,0.00015684245],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008304782,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00012918505,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49157137,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003803084,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000090817084,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30213755},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W847674796","doi":"","title":"Canadian Supreme Court, SoCan v. Canadian Association of Internet Providers","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; The Internet; Political science; Law; Association (psychology); Computer science; Psychology","score_opus":0.018083061155471727,"score_gpt":0.25254381462586545,"score_spread":0.23446075347039372,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W847674796","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.71664166,0.000023161054,0.00044471855,0.02846413,0.0038171571,0.0016328824,0.0024313815,0.00013945614,0.24640542],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9931652,0.000012399176,0.00039050623,0.0003696189,0.0010128095,0.000028503124,0.00029118205,0.000013685732,0.004716096],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987553,0.00002930757,0.0002199302,0.00018503371,0.0002801951,0.0005302672],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991169,0.000056662328,0.00015098324,0.00011733617,0.00017911043,0.0003790399],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00036045822,0.00012288972,0.00018473773,0.00010708695,0.0003922128,0.000087549706,0.0002152874,0.00016808425,0.00005947416],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000097717995,0.00014483568,0.00008893211,0.00017010777,0.000082296036,0.00048662105,0.000009168264,0.00012669204,0.000036307607],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000848387,0.00014376253,0.08705238,0.0001066209,0.00033874184,0.000009147609,0.033546165,0.0021554166,0.00017208405,0.3938903,0.40143263,0.08106793],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00038588594,0.000036938494,0.0011864624,0.000023047582,0.000027177686,3.766412e-7,0.00031260296,0.001285141,0.00023525709,0.00048975094,0.99584764,0.00016973165],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9684106,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9995534,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.594415,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021445516,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024712365,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5906227},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W854690614","doi":"10.71781/2522","title":"La désignation de la loi applicable en matière de successions internationales : la professio juris en droit international privé québécois et comparé","year":2012,"lang":"fr","type":"dissertation","venue":"Open MIND","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02269715151132467,"score_gpt":0.3884320344193233,"score_spread":0.3657348829079986,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W854690614","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4758825,0.00020121258,0.0010332876,0.0024256906,0.0008453895,0.0008065317,0.00013347848,0.0000134438,0.51865846],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8736933,0.0005255976,0.004050309,0.00007357488,0.000820882,0.00032167294,0.0014109266,0.00005108684,0.11905267],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9954673,0.002128641,0.00063393026,0.0005232811,0.00078706734,0.00045976858],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99676925,0.0018754316,0.0006211764,0.00022468598,0.0002630223,0.00024644326],"candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004281303,0.00036573998,0.0004105554,0.00023354469,0.0005551131,0.0008113548,0.0014797561,0.00093761535,0.010248219],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002915718,0.00039331146,0.00017387254,0.00030527258,0.00026317572,0.0011799983,0.00029002468,0.0008962923,0.00038993036],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022968439,0.0016703309,0.042517878,0.00013517865,0.0004746907,0.000027040545,0.38910982,0.00015071651,0.0042282203,0.11636177,0.0030160695,0.4420786],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000572166,0.000026857162,0.102444746,0.0006819908,0.0001462903,0.000017757744,0.01895347,0.0008548148,0.0007107806,0.001653415,0.87352306,0.00041466343],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.038051847,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06808288,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.870507,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011508854,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019098555,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998519},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W978723205","doi":"","title":"Interest-Based Negotiations in Multi-Party Disputes as an Alternative to Litigation in Aboriginal Cases in Canada:A Case Study","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Negotiation; Political science; Law and economics; Law; Business; Economics","score_opus":0.09162068237218847,"score_gpt":0.3867314760308211,"score_spread":0.29511079365863263,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W978723205","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9966473,0.000016164158,0.000060854087,0.0018211638,0.00013689786,0.0005474031,0.0000099923,0.000017692808,0.0007425173],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99916553,0.000006045805,0.00010804357,0.00039783618,0.00004255761,0.000062421124,0.000003825182,0.0000049178725,0.00020882023],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988152,0.00026063639,0.0002617057,0.00022819772,0.00020808549,0.0002262208],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994821,0.00018088886,0.00004400513,0.000101888865,0.000053593376,0.00013750649],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00028744809,0.00008772972,0.00012001548,0.00022034514,0.000119006654,0.000056959234,0.00010027818,0.000029036732,0.0003635798],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001323757,0.00008846209,0.000013400519,0.00051229517,0.000030414596,0.0003204521,0.000010107862,0.000112003116,0.000007366738],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021542797,0.0012679886,0.8706161,0.000003498339,0.0000051453458,0.0036615273,0.113796614,0.0016183069,0.000014423728,0.002747685,0.0001615183,0.006085678],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003107468,0.0006354491,0.6312165,0.000086677304,0.0000118457165,0.000031795804,0.27941278,0.07324563,0.00016221755,0.00009141357,0.011486338,0.00051187834],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99861336,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99997133,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23939955,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008958924,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004902347,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3980944},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}