{"meta":{"query_hash":"7623da691b4d","filters":{"topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction"},"cohort_total":941,"direct_labels_cover":0,"predictions_cover":941,"exported":941,"export_cap":100000,"truncated":false,"label_status":"direct model label, unvalidated","prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated (Codex and Gemma teacher distillation)","score_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","snapshot":{"source":"OpenAlex, pinned release, all 482 partitions","release":"2026-06-24","frame_built":"2026-07-12"},"permalink":"https://metacan.xera.ac/q/7623da691b4d","api":"https://metacan.xera.ac/api/v1/cohort?topic=Conflict+of+Laws+and+Jurisdiction"},"results":[{"id":"W1034493188","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511617706.016","title":"Domestic Partnership and Default Rules","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"General partnership; Business; Finance","score_opus":0.029011444085496642,"score_gpt":0.24782211117382869,"score_spread":0.21881066708833205,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1034493188","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018414967,0.002038239,0.03687905,0.007983096,0.000323281,0.00017088701,0.00041079763,0.000087122375,0.9336926],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8395319,0.0019597132,0.01955242,0.0072491243,0.00036718178,0.00081468007,0.0007471416,0.00017017753,0.1296077],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.984945,0.004949115,0.0013994491,0.003043466,0.0036572828,0.0020057024],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9929462,0.0029497768,0.0004351938,0.0016475058,0.0014469327,0.00057431945],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010306219,0.0003360608,0.00074945105,0.0008744585,0.0063356934,0.007896067,0.0020888736,0.004202705,0.013327003],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017161582,0.0005452252,0.00080080854,0.0011320248,0.014165712,0.0073078508,0.0061463676,0.0073852665,0.0020068837],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000024576937,0.0000038934954,0.000119246055,0.000007208582,0.0000011225388,0.00002445866,0.000427283,0.000056340417,0.000013916468,0.9951427,0.0022014945,0.001999924],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019257546,0.000013680569,0.00040686177,0.00015727544,0.000005280394,0.00021929611,0.0008204593,0.0005427015,0.00014053233,0.85833234,0.13932367,0.000018658506],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015796522,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011589034,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015796522,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005347158,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006400697,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05450517},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W105120299","doi":"","title":"The Citation of Overseas Authority in Rights Litigation in New Zealand: How Much Bark? How Much Bite?","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Skepticism; Law; Expansive; Political science; Discretion; Position (finance); Citation; Primary authority; Scope (computer science); Common law; Business; Legal research","score_opus":0.012256782850882535,"score_gpt":0.2859796415920334,"score_spread":0.2737228587411508,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W105120299","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4628053,0.1485513,0.0028786424,0.1408591,0.002052568,0.00018655622,0.0002971869,0.000057212288,0.24231213],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92168415,0.057625696,0.001664044,0.007930061,0.001066651,0.00003887811,0.00011250184,0.000035317793,0.009842647],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.98077387,0.0042325505,0.0028258783,0.00080685626,0.01011699,0.0012438947],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.87342113,0.07035138,0.029660301,0.0039100084,0.020490505,0.002166684],"candidate_categories":["bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013553197,0.00019394778,0.0008610365,0.011158979,0.0035969813,0.010722535,0.0014780583,0.0034749368,0.0020069955],"category_scores_gemma":[0.14254747,0.00033237223,0.0005554434,0.016870227,0.00992549,0.01167485,0.0028638763,0.0030877774,0.0003151246],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015774787,0.00009548407,0.12196891,0.002427236,0.00013689598,0.0024341356,0.11306619,0.00044627054,0.001354747,0.2623718,0.049730655,0.44580996],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000709449,0.00022065658,0.37423977,0.013267681,0.00047585275,0.0064337733,0.099396326,0.0015515925,0.0023905428,0.05131602,0.45026147,0.00037533807],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.20509312,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3120373,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.988841,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015616843,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015498736,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4077987},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W105835462","doi":"","title":"The Central Authority's Role Under the Hague Child Abduction Convention: A Friend in Deed","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Convention; Deed; Commission","score_opus":0.01183632001611879,"score_gpt":0.2749969363166129,"score_spread":0.26316061630049414,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W105835462","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02231577,0.04741718,0.0023069673,0.739174,0.007807701,0.000026304302,0.000063800486,0.00009596824,0.18079236],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5727937,0.015250633,0.0026577238,0.122867696,0.0021316975,0.00006745697,0.00004968844,0.00022134345,0.28396],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99067515,0.0050621005,0.00028011962,0.0009296945,0.0012714582,0.0017815449],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9942364,0.0023037577,0.00057044654,0.00033466436,0.0010460332,0.00150868],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009635868,0.0003754302,0.0005244671,0.0010544589,0.015639244,0.008888696,0.0015240258,0.008071366,0.0073648146],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015864855,0.0005604893,0.00021067105,0.0012248071,0.015584833,0.009195927,0.0062549254,0.012008572,0.0012244642],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003760649,0.000046401954,0.0038439932,0.000057787336,0.000010508141,0.002360171,0.050021008,0.00016221037,0.00025000118,0.4551584,0.43986997,0.048181936],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000061170126,0.000016370397,0.0010970539,0.0002667042,0.0000035817172,0.00079488277,0.021220712,0.000115101124,0.0002171978,0.02136076,0.9548675,0.000034034667],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.050269485,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10312593,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.050269485,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01066635,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012590235,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09995377},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W105991027","doi":"","title":"Deena R. Zimmerman. A Lifetime Companion to the Laws of Jewish Family Life. Jerusalem, New York: Urim Publications, 2006.","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Women in Judaism A Multidisciplinary e-Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Judaism; Law; Political science; History; Philosophy; Theology","score_opus":0.03700928633179574,"score_gpt":0.3154300897653495,"score_spread":0.27842080343355374,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W105991027","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0010832597,0.8231515,0.0008533131,0.14223473,0.010698582,0.000033200075,0.00046871725,0.00008368656,0.021393007],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.054543138,0.8202797,0.003714829,0.026994975,0.010260469,0.00013725496,0.00046718447,0.00016254753,0.08343979],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988876,0.0004255557,0.00014709168,0.0000829971,0.0003540472,0.00010275668],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99384516,0.002454432,0.0006034403,0.0001473495,0.0023589325,0.00059065537],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028608022,0.000953138,0.0006367635,0.0045470656,0.0042553786,0.0019720062,0.0017525745,0.003623935,0.016923025],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007923415,0.00076847966,0.00033373758,0.0034750046,0.0020968365,0.0054368977,0.0013726229,0.0054178555,0.0044146758],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032045446,0.000036143505,0.00087006384,0.00018396227,0.000007454167,0.00021282276,0.0021108475,0.000026699188,0.000055406425,0.009086493,0.89253235,0.09484577],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020201715,0.000035904908,0.009754017,0.0015607543,0.000019805724,0.00056525425,0.0042331386,0.000059693008,0.00020445646,0.009780508,0.97373116,0.00003517064],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05267277,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15494673,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05267277,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024244678,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0040672105,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.104732394},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W106135499","doi":"10.21991/c9fh4p","title":"BURYING ROTHMAN: THE SUPREME COURT AND THE RIGHT TO REMAIN SILENT","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.026490083894995447,"score_gpt":0.26767407790958886,"score_spread":0.24118399401459342,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W106135499","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.043016944,0.013127233,0.00999514,0.683329,0.00223073,0.000048873426,0.00012412656,0.000048950667,0.24807899],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86573046,0.002310646,0.003090322,0.09719921,0.0018237326,0.00014230095,0.000037432983,0.00009322557,0.029572608],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98154205,0.010435847,0.000584676,0.00250098,0.0017184558,0.0032178839],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97913367,0.014933606,0.0015883837,0.0016120406,0.0015958967,0.001136435],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.026533056,0.00055617763,0.0015376264,0.001200181,0.017948171,0.017950458,0.0037533664,0.044031292,0.0074744304],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04574605,0.0009340144,0.001176334,0.001558447,0.0581714,0.018808465,0.008779341,0.039213646,0.0009876615],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009540946,0.0000068049644,0.000055877466,0.0000051840534,0.0000048580737,0.000050224608,0.0015496456,0.000047814,0.00003575302,0.9918968,0.0055350703,0.00080241327],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000049716175,0.000010534127,0.00018539463,0.00009057913,0.000015939053,0.00006868891,0.0016992954,0.00022856053,0.0001898786,0.9531639,0.04425655,0.000040846222],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.029322809,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02924937,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.044031292,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007830723,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017993998,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14032185},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W11172357","doi":"10.1002/hep.510330227","title":"Reasonable Accommodation as a Settling Concept","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian women's studies","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Settling; Accommodation; Environmental science; Psychology; Environmental engineering; Neuroscience","score_opus":0.025292509532532318,"score_gpt":0.31321113571681014,"score_spread":0.2879186261842778,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W11172357","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.092168584,0.0015171876,0.025801722,0.04475149,0.0005524482,0.00017242583,0.000116023395,0.00005606353,0.8348641],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9804561,0.00020910946,0.0025725972,0.0012207848,0.00006584038,0.00011646667,0.000034863875,0.000025295334,0.0152989365],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97443974,0.013627075,0.0011856281,0.0019973132,0.0032892528,0.00546089],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97144127,0.016643444,0.0015312376,0.003194915,0.0043496527,0.0028395138],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019544592,0.000469753,0.0011198961,0.0036563373,0.04389539,0.01984367,0.0050965217,0.01107684,0.015505329],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05198937,0.00064905855,0.0012894358,0.0054778797,0.071157895,0.014202351,0.011603382,0.013899601,0.0007500816],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000037467019,0.000005779103,0.00006970221,0.0000036398742,5.677633e-7,0.000016571064,0.0033357264,0.000028154638,0.000008410743,0.995433,0.00044860208,0.0006460369],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025954074,0.000017935632,0.0006217221,0.00010017965,0.000010436569,0.000065994245,0.028508361,0.0005531794,0.000071995775,0.939287,0.030710177,0.000027135226],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1987423,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.24525458,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1987423,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.025875777,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.045032848,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.395171},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W112340790","doi":"","title":"\"Cross-border High Anxiety? Offensive and Defensive Strategies in Transnational Litigation: Offensive Strategies\"","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Offensive; Jurisdiction; Political science; Presentation (obstetrics); Adversary; Contradiction; Law enforcement; Law; Public relations; Business; Computer security; Economics; Management","score_opus":0.007915159962747673,"score_gpt":0.3355214574742419,"score_spread":0.3276062975114942,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W112340790","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19930282,0.041484673,0.010138568,0.26162788,0.0010463987,0.00016954294,0.00010000324,0.00014086695,0.48598924],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9556817,0.009677656,0.0016132895,0.012269854,0.00018266856,0.000042489963,0.00003793963,0.000022418479,0.020471962],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9958801,0.0011520948,0.00008827771,0.00020067966,0.0013330465,0.0013457381],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969627,0.0010924714,0.00029980627,0.00006114802,0.00075200194,0.0008317871],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003540321,0.00061702536,0.00028698266,0.0024510126,0.0124938935,0.013522591,0.0013090807,0.0034713584,0.0025457395],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0051730336,0.00018501659,0.00035203868,0.0025628605,0.017607737,0.0049076364,0.0048695863,0.0039930237,0.00024183109],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005460848,0.000069249574,0.009267738,0.00032392846,0.000030264326,0.001381559,0.32424074,0.00027437074,0.00096241443,0.47636822,0.0523064,0.13472053],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020627853,0.000057951907,0.03351704,0.0009922178,0.00006586085,0.0020294997,0.6254413,0.00076989626,0.0009257498,0.067156896,0.26890397,0.00011901568],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.47900558,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.68686056,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47900558,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.028203573,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.031173967,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9524349},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1150528758","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.2810","title":"Book Note: Judicial Decision-Making in a Globalised World: A Comparative Analysis of the Changing Practices of Western Highest Courts, by Elaine Mak","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Judicial opinion; Law; Sociology; Law and economics","score_opus":0.0399550450963449,"score_gpt":0.3864004467570552,"score_spread":0.3464454016607103,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1150528758","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03147887,0.035953645,0.002294173,0.59104174,0.0045226957,0.000056967823,0.001095346,0.000053447257,0.3335031],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4121939,0.05191601,0.0058818227,0.12136002,0.008387413,0.00017989436,0.00075397507,0.00023105777,0.39909607],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99942744,0.00024218488,0.000021126329,0.000061450555,0.00018432521,0.000063502564],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9934134,0.0055771978,0.00015179846,0.000087472734,0.0006372294,0.00013293135],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009772363,0.00025228126,0.00025242873,0.0008950786,0.0052603036,0.00639711,0.00088407885,0.0022145303,0.013669438],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003954609,0.00018083505,0.0001361003,0.0041192886,0.0045726206,0.0056891995,0.001116034,0.0031258767,0.001635015],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028900176,0.00004211621,0.00254871,0.00014980116,0.000008724189,0.0001514115,0.012301571,0.00033910605,0.00015520981,0.17165843,0.78713024,0.0254859],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014241804,0.000031308242,0.01190192,0.00049671443,0.000014168867,0.00017122395,0.040335644,0.00033537546,0.00031848607,0.05501309,0.8913354,0.000032437656],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.044394292,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.19959128,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.044394292,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002903499,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004226768,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08827174},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W131512840","doi":"","title":"THE DOCTRINE OF ADOPTION OF CUSTOMARY INTERNATIONAL LAW: A FUTURE IN CONFLICTING DOMESTIC LAW AND CROWN TORT LIABILITY","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Tort; Legislation; Doctrine; Customary international law; Political science; Principal (computer security); Common law; Municipal law; Liability; Conflict of laws; International law; Business; Public international law","score_opus":0.011227561302186904,"score_gpt":0.28843705148403875,"score_spread":0.27720949018185187,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W131512840","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14355722,0.013581546,0.06335978,0.13855946,0.0005527252,0.00007542745,0.00006965575,0.000050167375,0.64019406],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98356795,0.0014509175,0.0055771125,0.005053549,0.00019657992,0.000038546685,0.000019437022,0.000013000806,0.004082806],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9925096,0.002415596,0.00031934027,0.0008343643,0.0024635473,0.0014574502],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.991091,0.0042748093,0.0012384247,0.0011997079,0.0015351647,0.0006608318],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009293227,0.00028399436,0.0006028093,0.0015022878,0.00858359,0.009540442,0.0022111128,0.008109617,0.0013357162],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014087198,0.0004803238,0.00072430994,0.0022400836,0.07533866,0.01343338,0.006799602,0.012118731,0.000188726],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[9.4876054e-7,0.0000016354699,0.00011156851,0.0000022516317,2.770353e-7,0.000028167566,0.0013134517,0.000021084543,0.0000138223995,0.9975553,0.000162369,0.00078905205],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000067544042,0.000015306383,0.0014137473,0.00013707338,0.0000053684926,0.00027384717,0.0037365437,0.0005632751,0.00024007942,0.96322775,0.030350007,0.000030303285],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05355514,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.051204376,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05355514,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011617636,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013864607,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1064868},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W13583423","doi":"10.1164/artpd.1958.78.4.610","title":"Common Law Relationships in Ontario – The Details","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Review of Tuberculosis","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.02873567802602111,"score_gpt":0.30018415806051296,"score_spread":0.27144848003449185,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W13583423","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016871095,0.54472136,0.0007193815,0.25504115,0.0043436317,0.00021116222,0.0019028994,0.000038368235,0.17615095],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.30466,0.5293533,0.0018399253,0.054491695,0.00340814,0.00026328015,0.0011463416,0.00007136771,0.104766],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.995034,0.0008354532,0.0003427147,0.00033602255,0.002145647,0.001306212],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9847206,0.0034417794,0.0013255045,0.000592381,0.0077563915,0.0021633664],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0051327227,0.0003494812,0.00065630995,0.0039771646,0.008265213,0.006193134,0.0015427162,0.0035664737,0.011537722],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014235381,0.0005544902,0.0006787601,0.010235479,0.006605075,0.0043915357,0.0019117484,0.0026779186,0.0005380443],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005469602,0.000047152986,0.010416166,0.0030192018,0.00008771939,0.000513911,0.011175024,0.0005056281,0.00026468115,0.36027172,0.49528345,0.118360706],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013655295,0.000012715687,0.03022546,0.001977605,0.000038995626,0.00014564092,0.004120669,0.00010031514,0.000053498705,0.0092294635,0.9540379,0.00004408988],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9885216,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9963199,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12685199,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.12685199,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.24035934,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.92037994},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W138226371","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1261","title":"A Reply on \"Charter Dialogue Revisited\"","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Political science; Law and economics; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.02461080390444508,"score_gpt":0.30957070772371026,"score_spread":0.28495990381926517,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W138226371","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0006417513,0.0005396669,0.0012963375,0.943027,0.052209944,0.00004548834,0.00013522647,0.00017735238,0.00192725],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.013834598,0.00035794082,0.0008163635,0.95567995,0.02035068,0.00021400342,0.00008960143,0.00024777363,0.008409109],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9486607,0.02399396,0.0039697275,0.005416262,0.012754002,0.005205394],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.89962506,0.06612971,0.0053698644,0.0028422081,0.02243111,0.0036020754],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03078487,0.0021339008,0.0016613654,0.0024564879,0.015904615,0.011265165,0.008415643,0.078697905,0.011178153],"category_scores_gemma":[0.17306131,0.0012545312,0.0033652561,0.0026653165,0.01213384,0.01030688,0.0076897903,0.08364332,0.0050628823],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000069898335,0.00001180867,0.00011556776,0.000099830206,0.000012694541,0.0006453153,0.0038543313,0.000111951565,0.00040335668,0.012217739,0.98065764,0.0017998441],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000048358146,0.000060157898,0.00076818146,0.00047694653,0.000043479955,0.00046892834,0.010415364,0.0006625995,0.0014216598,0.012464691,0.9729288,0.00024095284],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.025190571,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016124828,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.078697905,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.024584725,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013616025,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17837548},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1480424489","doi":"","title":"Heading for the Light: International Relocation from Canada","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Relocation; Statute; Supreme court; Law; Legislature; Political science; Geography","score_opus":0.020781188502298226,"score_gpt":0.2669756940476203,"score_spread":0.24619450554532205,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1480424489","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.057431504,0.011197376,0.00058113964,0.07145895,0.0019155117,0.00008901461,0.002260065,0.00008925449,0.8549773],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.58234733,0.024407836,0.0011804121,0.08813142,0.00063778984,0.0000771022,0.003730315,0.00032876412,0.29915908],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9951285,0.0001661201,0.000091011636,0.00041931143,0.0017845242,0.0024105867],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960698,0.00035437752,0.00028514842,0.00016101854,0.0017829079,0.0013467744],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015291971,0.00040212375,0.0002832256,0.0030802595,0.016558332,0.008431802,0.0015835048,0.0022981511,0.01099196],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0060986658,0.00034841025,0.0004008848,0.0061912206,0.0039098584,0.0024530687,0.0033955988,0.0058918227,0.0009610183],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039720355,0.00004100397,0.015031269,0.00018289177,0.000021413754,0.0020371315,0.015412337,0.00022863415,0.00024039412,0.16799477,0.7480483,0.050722044],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007007755,0.000010352178,0.024003234,0.00029803245,0.000020396034,0.00051071873,0.019581184,0.00007926939,0.00024502602,0.001888517,0.95328885,0.00006740439],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9887778,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99666315,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.070108406,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.070108406,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12616344,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5086745},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1482254455","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1146","title":"Appendix A: Supreme Court of Canada Cases Written by Justice Bertha Wilson 1982-1991","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Economic Justice; Law; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.03389982151679562,"score_gpt":0.29481558853046325,"score_spread":0.26091576701366764,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1482254455","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"dataset","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"dataset","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009452546,0.010089655,0.0013837665,0.019550422,0.0069722678,0.0073302514,0.3208482,0.000608839,0.62376404],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.053293824,0.013890677,0.0055755735,0.025282502,0.0022886102,0.0057170857,0.08289258,0.0003708528,0.8106883],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99645483,0.00021343687,0.0003212254,0.00028179685,0.001983273,0.0007454405],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9770563,0.006771053,0.0008972681,0.0005811803,0.0137360925,0.00095809647],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021200962,0.001254208,0.001274225,0.012275027,0.009402929,0.004483489,0.005430352,0.006236715,0.17645927],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021562388,0.0015163501,0.0009373263,0.019706393,0.0014510273,0.0016611764,0.0012425729,0.0027659081,0.024728356],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022231032,0.000034250428,0.00023013791,0.0001858756,0.000006305385,0.00012788427,0.00013669477,0.00008510898,0.00007141425,0.0034457652,0.9915258,0.0041285134],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001929752,0.000022422084,0.019899268,0.001127527,0.00004889658,0.00016753846,0.000692516,0.00018642326,0.0004093733,0.0030173364,0.97415507,0.00008065944],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.93442345,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9737674,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17645927,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03892354,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08687037,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5903151},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1482624622","doi":"","title":"Foreword: Transdisciplinary Conflicts of Law","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Discipline; Doctrine; Sociology; Politics; Context (archaeology); Field (mathematics); Interdisciplinarity; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.06637315951268648,"score_gpt":0.3348678872722926,"score_spread":0.26849472775960614,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1482624622","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0015681861,0.08366947,0.0045777117,0.27095073,0.50540686,0.00011245687,0.0002820936,0.0002016982,0.13323073],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.051009897,0.07224213,0.0051347152,0.10479595,0.47388333,0.00031364945,0.0007861233,0.00053209363,0.29130208],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985201,0.00058020535,0.00009990609,0.00016512828,0.0005154202,0.00011927513],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9952154,0.0030136402,0.00022549788,0.00022404947,0.0008862781,0.00043514298],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014931394,0.0010121998,0.0009881633,0.0021370172,0.0044712573,0.008864553,0.0015121123,0.004993807,0.035472028],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0069649396,0.00032138816,0.00079571095,0.0018446109,0.0040431917,0.005706811,0.0026489408,0.010349504,0.00916698],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012335115,0.000020349291,0.00010863325,0.00018277633,0.0000055394003,0.000053305914,0.000836379,0.000058586094,0.00012462705,0.040115174,0.93983877,0.01864349],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000024518129,0.000012690571,0.00024492847,0.00022350237,0.0000032360354,0.00011527803,0.0007588745,0.00006008621,0.000040246097,0.008628987,0.98990357,0.0000061408277],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016993282,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002633155,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.035472028,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022612175,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0018579988,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.118665755},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1482687590","doi":"","title":"(Still) A \"Real and Substantial\" Mess: The Law of Jurisdiction in Canada","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Roger Williams University - Digital Commons (Roger Williams University)","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Supreme court; Law; Plaintiff; Personal jurisdiction; Original jurisdiction; Tort; Political science; Test (biology); Exclusive jurisdiction; Liability","score_opus":0.008385995887342462,"score_gpt":0.18634015840235252,"score_spread":0.17795416251501006,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1482687590","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.033728044,0.017161531,0.0029639069,0.37475115,0.001555663,0.00008463697,0.0011143616,0.00011793104,0.5685229],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.75066674,0.004113616,0.0022244921,0.079591885,0.0003877325,0.000070816204,0.00019730726,0.00007701761,0.16267033],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960108,0.00045365957,0.00006864001,0.00038136408,0.0013387337,0.0017468906],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978009,0.0005018841,0.00010736605,0.000074445576,0.0009542802,0.00056102185],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002518192,0.00032015418,0.00028445772,0.0008111723,0.024010254,0.012387313,0.0018423181,0.008161207,0.010186611],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006923977,0.00041309945,0.0004161502,0.0015831444,0.014933401,0.0031749397,0.0025319685,0.0059277527,0.00086761016],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016328433,0.000008906847,0.0010735616,0.000028369896,0.0000068335403,0.0001575475,0.006428858,0.0001869685,0.00009558199,0.79499596,0.1893736,0.0076274816],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000047638416,0.00001696306,0.01111883,0.0003052575,0.000051655705,0.00013841935,0.012819059,0.00079266506,0.00036291147,0.10494439,0.8692658,0.00013648756],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9909072,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9957527,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07991501,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07991501,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12420775,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5798267},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1483392136","doi":"10.21991/c9tq11","title":"ABORIGINAL AND TREATY RIGHTS - RECONCILING POWERS AND DUTIES: A COMMENT ON HORSEMAN, SIOUI AND SPARROW","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Sparrow; Treaty; Political science; Law; Ecology","score_opus":0.02812045969686056,"score_gpt":0.28528189733142384,"score_spread":0.2571614376345633,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1483392136","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004864472,0.004807806,0.00044902018,0.95509803,0.009931958,0.00010590032,0.00016350063,0.00004190123,0.024537342],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.017967617,0.0014180451,0.00058580673,0.94305974,0.00372087,0.00020174553,0.000035677676,0.00007919636,0.032931324],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9808672,0.0049179555,0.0016771234,0.003055552,0.004097577,0.0053846],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9675364,0.02321256,0.0015170447,0.0010167293,0.004153026,0.0025642535],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.023022829,0.0014092999,0.0034201173,0.0014192692,0.04886727,0.015566687,0.010605105,0.12937737,0.008610894],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04583758,0.0035577186,0.003399852,0.0028922516,0.01712464,0.009721642,0.008561042,0.12737456,0.0023594531],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009358139,0.00007927597,0.0006916611,0.00028629965,0.00007320433,0.0008102931,0.03645017,0.0001704446,0.00048023454,0.14602524,0.8104142,0.004425451],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016338755,0.00006921993,0.003512371,0.001351716,0.00025336677,0.00021307945,0.026086794,0.00028859742,0.00082514994,0.021554349,0.9453912,0.0002907414],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5061175,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.67914253,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49388248,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.021478942,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.061714992,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9935821},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1493643925","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511770678.006","title":"<i>Logos biou</i>: law's life stories","year":2010,"lang":"he","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Logos Bible Software; Subjectivity; Linguistics; Philosophy; Sociology; Epistemology; Theology","score_opus":0.030486692915942346,"score_gpt":0.23327123926433646,"score_spread":0.2027845463483941,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1493643925","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0021200392,0.018596547,0.0013638216,0.0183845,0.0016041058,0.000026780493,0.00013763354,0.00011108953,0.9576555],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.15159568,0.01735728,0.0013021588,0.008667191,0.001802078,0.00020683074,0.00033925913,0.00027855535,0.818451],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.999689,0.00015764523,0.0000065001223,0.000028643366,0.000081530925,0.000036666806],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99971217,0.00017435635,0.000023315964,0.000020977437,0.00003892045,0.000030192357],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004151416,0.00054183236,0.00018997681,0.0012175448,0.0031214133,0.004299594,0.00060937286,0.0015747591,0.0160219],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011763362,0.00019586734,0.00011426601,0.0012372396,0.0065054223,0.0048851785,0.0012919601,0.0029387372,0.004369817],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001762952,0.000023355475,0.000115194525,0.00008655453,0.0000016573858,0.00011178163,0.012951994,0.000050073046,0.00017161643,0.6336568,0.32602927,0.026784088],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002114967,0.0000035441642,0.00018416627,0.00013727343,7.684341e-7,0.000102513346,0.002932548,0.000049103346,0.0001203237,0.032410834,0.9640532,0.0000035481207],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00596502,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009646386,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0160219,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030066876,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014205715,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.053598642},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1494327544","doi":"","title":"The Incorporation of International Customary Norms in Canadian Common Law (L'incorporation de la coutume internationale en common law canadienne)","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Doctrine; Customary international law; Common law; Political science; Supreme court; Foundation (evidence); International law; Public international law","score_opus":0.0075078298125198836,"score_gpt":0.25784421798828705,"score_spread":0.25033638817576714,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1494327544","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10955875,0.0064574275,0.010252635,0.0146313505,0.00042996238,0.00008277809,0.0001640254,0.000053185777,0.8583698],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97119886,0.002016048,0.003228037,0.0013968692,0.00006571672,0.000023304987,0.000046147354,0.000019195626,0.022005787],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9935229,0.00084214984,0.0001701437,0.00068566046,0.003293338,0.0014857076],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967637,0.0009675042,0.00039461316,0.00027593743,0.0012966043,0.0003015824],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004421354,0.00031551992,0.0002975942,0.0019134096,0.012505017,0.009676388,0.0009197714,0.0017452858,0.0023365903],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00805166,0.00025940497,0.0003376981,0.0037423968,0.02481176,0.002867419,0.00391101,0.0033899606,0.00015777079],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000042316187,0.0000040152054,0.0009231905,0.000017383703,0.0000023736507,0.00007204232,0.010811234,0.00012246516,0.00010094713,0.975486,0.0016828566,0.010773112],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015795027,0.00005120493,0.029525056,0.00075037574,0.000087279885,0.0005580841,0.025804881,0.0015643826,0.0016524657,0.2729241,0.6668494,0.00021706805],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.89421874,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.95146775,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10578126,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04618228,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06299173,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3350774},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1498872387","doi":"","title":"Citizenship, Public and Private","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law and Contemporary Problems","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Citizenship; Private law; Political science; Law; Argument (complex analysis); Immigration; Public law; International law; Law and economics; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.08418545540329092,"score_gpt":0.2658189085034144,"score_spread":0.18163345310012347,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1498872387","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04416775,0.006308372,0.009796064,0.05782296,0.00042450122,0.000045773264,0.00004809571,0.00004651768,0.88133997],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96082723,0.0015586514,0.00095443375,0.004450968,0.00022314941,0.00004841678,0.00002649721,0.000027883636,0.031882785],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9947336,0.0023031035,0.0001281548,0.000479192,0.0009485003,0.0014074657],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965856,0.0017220002,0.00028854015,0.00037455035,0.0004654944,0.0005638244],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035009624,0.0003322132,0.00037007476,0.0016672759,0.00951282,0.01505369,0.0008193526,0.0044853664,0.0064141965],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004881207,0.00025757335,0.0003489459,0.001814804,0.05948691,0.014055021,0.006417921,0.0050910916,0.0005945584],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000018765699,0.000007147128,0.00020195443,0.0000070732312,0.0000010051732,0.000029113307,0.003309345,0.000022503607,0.000010596874,0.9920238,0.0018518326,0.002533744],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007619258,0.00002012078,0.0014380614,0.00018726509,0.0000055585174,0.0001432112,0.017772533,0.00024031215,0.00013550148,0.7777688,0.20226647,0.000014528379],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020070134,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020834157,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020070134,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0088785235,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008437193,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.064418554},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1502707216","doi":"","title":"從加拿大最高法院CCH Canadian Ltd. v. Law Society of Upper Canada案探討加拿大圖書館提供文獻傳遞服務與自助式影印服務之侵權責任(上)","year":2012,"lang":"zh","type":"article","venue":"智慧財產權","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.02147692411295192,"score_gpt":0.27776519141566447,"score_spread":0.25628826730271254,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1502707216","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.041012768,0.005526264,0.0016987525,0.093128935,0.001046578,0.00018005128,0.001405239,0.00012400048,0.85587734],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.42876834,0.0027445487,0.0018335211,0.05444068,0.0002087172,0.0001292249,0.00036835665,0.00006130966,0.51144534],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99502254,0.00025167814,0.00010429555,0.00030350705,0.00223139,0.0020866808],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99490607,0.00091679156,0.00017217027,0.0001027418,0.0029613692,0.0009408658],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018627252,0.0003701949,0.00031334895,0.0013262117,0.020424794,0.0076006814,0.0017309521,0.0065183723,0.013392201],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0063251387,0.0006294529,0.00048279678,0.0017897844,0.004505094,0.0020221467,0.0014808831,0.0043614563,0.0010912836],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007925944,0.00003791278,0.0070014657,0.00017736612,0.000028305436,0.0004682667,0.0068440526,0.00043012158,0.0009509074,0.5933599,0.3659447,0.024677709],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000036704703,0.000030090132,0.012518787,0.00025757847,0.00006298119,0.00012188294,0.00535632,0.0004860059,0.0013958146,0.012990703,0.9666282,0.000115035495],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9852326,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9952213,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0725835,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0725835,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.18678941,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5266326},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1502825396","doi":"","title":"Jurisdiction and the Enforcement of Foreign Judgments","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Roger Williams University - Digital Commons (Roger Williams University)","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Supreme court; Law; Enforcement; Context (archaeology); Subject-matter jurisdiction; Personal jurisdiction; Original jurisdiction; Political science; History","score_opus":0.009999391177054026,"score_gpt":0.19920723389060857,"score_spread":0.18920784271355454,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1502825396","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15893058,0.0025245429,0.031598423,0.02179169,0.00044437035,0.0001663826,0.0001783454,0.00024151936,0.78412414],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9701877,0.00035494077,0.0028078489,0.0026919497,0.000087434906,0.00003532346,0.000053500415,0.00004913043,0.023732144],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97632265,0.0056441333,0.0009612387,0.0041003837,0.007630805,0.005340783],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98566484,0.0050399704,0.0011944356,0.0021057304,0.0049118656,0.0010832044],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015251478,0.0004556172,0.00067101076,0.0024115762,0.012217273,0.014378457,0.0024118344,0.004972179,0.005074261],"category_scores_gemma":[0.032336455,0.0006699676,0.00081379176,0.0013474862,0.026734097,0.0050802683,0.0068509053,0.0069701397,0.00090414553],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029046927,0.000018151986,0.0018270554,0.000022592792,0.00002745742,0.00029639114,0.0049802517,0.000674331,0.00043129982,0.9792474,0.003271662,0.009174443],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011071903,0.00009393376,0.0092714215,0.00049668597,0.0001362799,0.000379951,0.007189384,0.0045007677,0.003413318,0.7878789,0.18629159,0.00023711895],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.38792795,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.42458108,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.38792795,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016719041,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.035778392,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7713399},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1504181684","doi":"","title":"Global Problems in Domestic Courts","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Raymond and Beverly Sackler Institute for Biological, Physical and Engineering Sciences, Yale University; York University; Yale University; Carnegie Corporation of New York; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Business; Political science; Law and economics; Law; Economics","score_opus":0.028655749687731706,"score_gpt":0.29056532110783745,"score_spread":0.26190957142010574,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1504181684","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013959049,0.015536791,0.0016182405,0.05484676,0.0005946975,0.000032105854,0.0001438226,0.00006261478,0.9132059],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.75494313,0.017456643,0.001981678,0.040590297,0.0018345648,0.00022119202,0.0003951471,0.00024278807,0.18233456],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.990774,0.0032831237,0.00033089067,0.0014941908,0.0017718752,0.0023458123],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99707127,0.0011924634,0.00028881157,0.000594616,0.00044431636,0.00040851574],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0046370435,0.00064669526,0.001060942,0.0029907494,0.01394414,0.021049723,0.002353336,0.012443195,0.029236732],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007465709,0.00046188006,0.00093030947,0.005929419,0.023011962,0.013506127,0.012446716,0.010931051,0.0029875748],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000029558764,0.000007778144,0.00021455297,0.000026033713,0.0000053536414,0.00012742795,0.0024571936,0.00013123255,0.000013861058,0.97856367,0.013250638,0.005199226],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011414953,0.000016107615,0.0015442797,0.0004461657,0.000019900193,0.00050810166,0.010576007,0.00030131658,0.0000855733,0.5384441,0.4480261,0.000020915117],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015222122,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019865816,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029236732,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014747503,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007891107,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.107001126},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1505147135","doi":"10.1017/cbo9781139058933.006","title":"Placer Dome Inc.","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Brock University","funders":"","keywords":"Placer mining; Dome (geology); Geology; Mining engineering; Geochemistry; Paleontology","score_opus":0.030284985455280064,"score_gpt":0.23605018433406122,"score_spread":0.20576519887878114,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1505147135","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00015202275,0.0032667033,0.0014188497,0.00082454673,0.0006950494,0.0000352778,0.0012855172,0.0018589228,0.9904631],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00048222483,0.00091384695,0.00036969737,0.00017279958,0.000059209546,0.000013108222,0.00030584258,0.00033795464,0.9973454],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99957925,0.000036277557,0.00002076798,0.000099522826,0.0002260915,0.00003811937],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993616,0.00014258537,0.000038803602,0.000110823334,0.000204249,0.00014197612],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00040929715,0.0010982146,0.00078235066,0.0021652232,0.0014900905,0.004893665,0.0011691132,0.0019315657,0.79147875],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018308128,0.00068406574,0.00042184585,0.0025646433,0.0005953846,0.004958778,0.0023578429,0.0019053292,0.7529107],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002324027,0.000015618707,0.000050516952,0.0002508188,0.0000014816638,0.00007363237,0.00014885528,0.000045580935,0.00035035648,0.01213863,0.8201308,0.16677046],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000017436982,0.0000039890174,0.00004472682,0.000044950033,7.5864216e-7,0.00007045447,0.000025476578,0.000015498388,0.000068841306,0.0005902415,0.9991309,0.0000024201283],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021783486,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0078806095,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.79147875,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008351014,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010048762,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29743022},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1512866983","doi":"","title":"Foreign Official Immunity and the 'Baseline' Problem","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Fordham law review","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Statutory law; Doctrine; Law; Personal jurisdiction; Political science; Universal jurisdiction; State (computer science); Common law; State immunity; Customary international law; Qualified immunity; International law; Sovereign immunity; Public international law; Constitution","score_opus":0.05194192873920622,"score_gpt":0.304862104085157,"score_spread":0.2529201753459508,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1512866983","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.079363674,0.0035785115,0.02482327,0.0728157,0.001397259,0.00010165871,0.00041168617,0.00017420581,0.817334],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9553836,0.00084558653,0.0031784037,0.008589763,0.00045877692,0.00012442049,0.0002334206,0.00005407041,0.031131988],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9895285,0.004045824,0.00049194257,0.0020720249,0.0019388542,0.00192299],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99166334,0.0036129376,0.0007374902,0.0016147265,0.0017969043,0.0005745574],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009975283,0.0002875907,0.0009217686,0.0017197503,0.005888958,0.0053674257,0.0020815886,0.0045664497,0.02050413],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03411491,0.00029189832,0.0005964149,0.001669499,0.007353525,0.008203387,0.0051739984,0.0073702303,0.0015525062],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017740618,0.000020785596,0.0008338406,0.000034398334,0.0000048483407,0.00012936564,0.0008215757,0.00010473391,0.000025447453,0.9817585,0.006071459,0.0101772975],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007036372,0.000094240335,0.0043429197,0.00035404137,0.000026176684,0.0010309925,0.0051942565,0.001048132,0.00027076778,0.80309105,0.18445167,0.00002544944],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0134235555,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009520525,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02050413,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0050842417,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0047990372,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.068593085},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1517374998","doi":"","title":"Vicarious Liability for Sexual Abuse","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Vicarious liability; Liability; Abuse liability; Business; Sexual abuse; Psychology; Criminology; Tort; Psychiatry; Medicine; Medical emergency; Poison control; Suicide prevention; Finance","score_opus":0.015330460112827734,"score_gpt":0.30751584353046674,"score_spread":0.292185383417639,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1517374998","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.78277564,0.0036461402,0.006693927,0.018379023,0.0002789796,0.00015786612,0.00049031834,0.000056373032,0.18752171],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99607086,0.0003461575,0.00033922435,0.00053000724,0.000047060872,0.000017181554,0.00005824553,0.0000024632773,0.0025889236],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99795365,0.00081537676,0.00019678334,0.0001491821,0.0003670063,0.00051793957],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9892217,0.004920214,0.0023657891,0.0013302781,0.00071001943,0.0014519808],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026808262,0.00013371422,0.00031364337,0.0012632969,0.002426412,0.0010688457,0.00083614327,0.0040231794,0.0064602112],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023323001,0.00028035126,0.00030526365,0.0005229351,0.0019473509,0.000890726,0.002896668,0.002742942,0.00065695454],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002924661,0.00060810393,0.35583347,0.00019393233,0.00017776148,0.017143695,0.011428254,0.0018232024,0.00218251,0.5288419,0.016910475,0.06456412],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013917335,0.0010472052,0.34190094,0.0011934586,0.00026745925,0.12300486,0.0121508865,0.012884514,0.0035225304,0.41799384,0.085765384,0.0001297315],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0015091908,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004355214,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0064602112,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006471111,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023009758,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021611571},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1517882249","doi":"","title":"Personal Jurisdiction over Non-Resident Class Members: Have We Gone Down the Wrong Road?","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Roger Williams University - Digital Commons (Roger Williams University)","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Res judicata; Plaintiff; Personal jurisdiction; Settlement (finance); Law; Political science; Class (philosophy); Test (biology); Business; Computer science","score_opus":0.011543238349911571,"score_gpt":0.22792671017098304,"score_spread":0.21638347182107145,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1517882249","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11446373,0.013181274,0.008588883,0.6232121,0.0011212623,0.00005691118,0.00023394365,0.00013127894,0.23901063],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9334828,0.003285748,0.0015422065,0.044147175,0.000322876,0.000020961386,0.00006175165,0.00007773193,0.017058775],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.987023,0.0020968064,0.00034623334,0.0016757622,0.00400297,0.00485514],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9861421,0.003248676,0.0008422423,0.0011023331,0.0047475616,0.003917084],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010568639,0.00031514294,0.0007876547,0.0014967232,0.02209812,0.016652316,0.004542143,0.00853354,0.009545252],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027155869,0.00042458865,0.00073766964,0.0015163154,0.03866091,0.01658032,0.0049409056,0.013508237,0.0010788466],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000046972007,0.000044833396,0.010600166,0.00011245861,0.000043010066,0.00083109696,0.037639298,0.00031312296,0.0004893699,0.8255757,0.0571814,0.067122474],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000046698366,0.00007004127,0.036589213,0.0012649177,0.00014706126,0.0009747661,0.114242256,0.0009928274,0.0013599815,0.4246797,0.4193448,0.00028775175],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8304649,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8956878,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8304649,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04128148,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07358353,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34106702},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1518832054","doi":"","title":"Competing Class Actions Across Canada: Still at the Starting Gate after Canada Post v. Lépine","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Jurisdiction; Class (philosophy); Context (archaeology); Law; Political science; History; Artificial intelligence; Computer science","score_opus":0.008370203779381495,"score_gpt":0.26699537673889207,"score_spread":0.2586251729595106,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1518832054","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23272943,0.014398169,0.0016966572,0.4535488,0.0017703954,0.00009121883,0.00091586116,0.00006778148,0.29478177],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8093537,0.0029231287,0.00064538274,0.08823994,0.00024399394,0.00003554144,0.000116644536,0.00004407237,0.09839758],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99543756,0.00027997931,0.000070958835,0.0005190945,0.0012973254,0.0023950755],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968072,0.00078652764,0.00013296281,0.00010320411,0.0012607817,0.0009093823],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002307301,0.00030849627,0.0004804007,0.000675982,0.03138293,0.010163247,0.0021678621,0.010315211,0.0058382805],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0056107626,0.00038659506,0.00055944157,0.0015314433,0.006719217,0.0025723248,0.0025689625,0.011230823,0.0003660978],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001455842,0.000046676305,0.013165811,0.000109626424,0.000057252197,0.0026104983,0.040157434,0.00062971236,0.0010710006,0.6634181,0.23561195,0.042976327],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007284258,0.00006285642,0.032451343,0.00043655225,0.00013874508,0.0004206125,0.056598064,0.0009527506,0.001469201,0.026378691,0.8807249,0.00029340055],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.995194,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99854326,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09763391,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09763391,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.15479013,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7083869},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1523662420","doi":"","title":"Extraterritoriality and Extranationality: A Comparative Study","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Extraterritoriality; Presumption; Indigenous; Political science; International law; Law; Context (archaeology); Sovereignty; Geography; Jurisdiction","score_opus":0.12374301795006006,"score_gpt":0.4215840749916645,"score_spread":0.29784105704160446,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1523662420","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6418698,0.011244556,0.0009270126,0.0017611842,0.00006477206,0.00002915396,0.00007184096,0.0000044064996,0.34402722],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99209493,0.005161437,0.00030654875,0.00018963564,0.000022933082,0.0000148131785,0.0000450498,0.000005782201,0.0021588537],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99672014,0.0018065133,0.00009978327,0.00024999343,0.00055568747,0.00056787406],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.997358,0.0014168697,0.0003499188,0.00017871897,0.0004845574,0.0002118981],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022734466,0.00015345466,0.0003658754,0.0034681666,0.004901566,0.0045445217,0.00052739243,0.00077320065,0.004126327],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0040438697,0.00015046766,0.0002709386,0.0067512956,0.007340137,0.0058264914,0.0031419024,0.0014074068,0.00013985341],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000046865815,0.00014128868,0.026608134,0.0004500906,0.000049967635,0.0016462671,0.19958961,0.00046886696,0.0005419228,0.7136991,0.0022681672,0.05448972],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001991522,0.00019270829,0.19635138,0.0021168762,0.00010412701,0.002617507,0.5351256,0.0010436008,0.00065242755,0.038869962,0.22284552,0.000060310198],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.078761995,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1220383,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.078761995,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0059421733,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003000057,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15660709},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1526115827","doi":"","title":"Forum Non Conveniens in Quebec: Assessment of a Transplant","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Discretion; Doctrine; Law; Political science; Conflict of laws; Civil procedure; Common law","score_opus":0.014862442950173171,"score_gpt":0.29007396076489245,"score_spread":0.27521151781471925,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1526115827","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.74703723,0.0044632903,0.0018125747,0.052081343,0.00045743678,0.00028607895,0.000566465,0.000041178188,0.19325434],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98228526,0.0006231693,0.0004269225,0.004600755,0.00003878473,0.000048268237,0.000075540134,0.000007421266,0.011893962],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99299896,0.0012287587,0.00013662863,0.00043716957,0.0024720065,0.0027265118],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9864319,0.0037762134,0.0011942731,0.00038478232,0.005783717,0.0024290413],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008043705,0.00022015124,0.00037611852,0.0019327556,0.012802011,0.0082796365,0.002047361,0.0028295938,0.0075099804],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01591774,0.00021386328,0.0006418359,0.0029103984,0.0071577546,0.002895214,0.0031598557,0.0040686554,0.00018307762],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005532217,0.00035694908,0.1854245,0.00038526332,0.00011381512,0.002973363,0.038745437,0.0031485194,0.0019391454,0.58345526,0.052305184,0.1305993],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027307542,0.00047531142,0.5501202,0.0010321428,0.00022567356,0.0008177265,0.11986271,0.0076245363,0.0015281157,0.018245645,0.2995588,0.00023601908],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9807679,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9924344,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12852918,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.12852918,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14540005,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9325488},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1526549200","doi":"","title":"The FG Hemisphere Case in Hong Kong: China's Africa Policy in the Courts of Its First Special Administrative Region","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Mainland China; Appeal; Sovereignty; China; Political science; Government (linguistics); Law; Basic law; Democracy; State (computer science); Power (physics); Public administration; Constitution; Politics","score_opus":0.026965526531290886,"score_gpt":0.31750129764266655,"score_spread":0.2905357711113757,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1526549200","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8716797,0.0026610433,0.00038921437,0.016171679,0.00024013508,0.00007301404,0.000107163,0.000010001439,0.10866794],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9856582,0.0006654296,0.00011147973,0.0038912734,0.00004946001,0.00002821664,0.000017447795,0.0000024487642,0.009576042],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99747986,0.0006331107,0.000083782434,0.0001617907,0.00018566828,0.0014558581],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982212,0.0006977072,0.00023537065,0.00012515148,0.00024373215,0.0004768404],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029648566,0.00036933902,0.00041497542,0.00068521575,0.009664815,0.006085382,0.00069652963,0.0036111423,0.0023249735],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003332956,0.00033889915,0.00042102407,0.001244461,0.0062338104,0.00184314,0.0023350103,0.0028705006,0.00014361164],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004262232,0.00011685188,0.053338807,0.00027160134,0.00010406252,0.034353536,0.08957873,0.0017876761,0.0024928376,0.7797255,0.025143346,0.012660901],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006622141,0.00064806256,0.28149226,0.0016823786,0.00042807328,0.005010087,0.20227769,0.005543673,0.00701396,0.055879988,0.4388034,0.0005582367],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.53032184,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.54913723,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.53032184,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02312477,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015916755,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9448884},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1528881838","doi":"","title":"Siting Foreign Law: How Derrida Can Help","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Duke journal of comparative & international law","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Institution; Judaism; Sociology; Law; Classics; History; Political science; Archaeology","score_opus":0.09109940972700245,"score_gpt":0.3394804521501871,"score_spread":0.24838104242318462,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1528881838","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006066304,0.015512323,0.0014251331,0.6598805,0.01217656,0.000059543287,0.00007468203,0.000422107,0.3043828],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.087635376,0.01046083,0.003700873,0.30177623,0.002401824,0.00013175169,0.00019934423,0.0007731217,0.59292066],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962167,0.001955184,0.0000970458,0.00037057127,0.00049209624,0.00086839736],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99551964,0.0010619735,0.00014113645,0.00024146833,0.0006646389,0.002371186],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00554408,0.0007699303,0.000486105,0.0009035467,0.018751517,0.015401923,0.002531722,0.010511143,0.06343011],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009738266,0.00044053362,0.00053460215,0.0006887311,0.009950285,0.016976425,0.009377044,0.013675361,0.026466403],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001749573,0.00010538203,0.00092891,0.0001000986,0.000008039854,0.0010271085,0.030173773,0.000048959453,0.00013978557,0.05846032,0.85278666,0.05620355],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000052797354,0.000010782643,0.00025695938,0.00019224918,0.0000022773004,0.00027721343,0.026781112,0.000036150912,0.00004548086,0.005660525,0.96672016,0.0000118551625],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020779468,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.052184965,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06343011,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006023368,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008451311,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2121948},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1532334626","doi":"10.15837/aijjs.v8i2.1187","title":"CONSIDERATIONS REGARDING THE FIRST PRELIMINARY RULING OF THE HIGH COURT OF CASSATION AND JUSTICE","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Agora International Journal of Juridical Sciences","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Law; Political science; Preliminary ruling; Accountability","score_opus":0.02670280495105994,"score_gpt":0.3160015155987504,"score_spread":0.28929871064769047,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1532334626","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.080800116,0.0052740336,0.07888276,0.5852334,0.017955225,0.001454804,0.00051297084,0.0007749423,0.2291118],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.72822446,0.0012007861,0.08539786,0.100510135,0.00664163,0.0014924847,0.0002806768,0.00028728406,0.07596468],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.90601635,0.030684205,0.007633409,0.008870635,0.028795114,0.018000294],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9058785,0.059394676,0.004115489,0.007937077,0.01792068,0.0047535934],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.08605338,0.0008841926,0.0012566389,0.0022697547,0.018308308,0.022550633,0.009986412,0.03845382,0.0072870455],"category_scores_gemma":[0.17062235,0.0015741603,0.0034752158,0.0020446992,0.014184396,0.010501838,0.004246639,0.041269433,0.0018698386],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016411091,0.00011192063,0.001615522,0.00013389488,0.00006657203,0.0013568188,0.004818488,0.0009096073,0.0025122191,0.9390007,0.036316242,0.012993928],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021132467,0.00062291924,0.011695493,0.0012262984,0.00023056082,0.0014380708,0.00906217,0.003586496,0.010705479,0.4060947,0.55421275,0.000913706],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.040379822,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05825805,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08605338,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017273817,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.038527913,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.45509923},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1533771626","doi":"","title":"Jurisdiction and Choice of Law Rules for Defamation Actions in Australia Following the Gutnick Case and the Uniform Defamation Legislation","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Australian international law journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Choice of law; Jurisdiction; Law; Conflict of laws; Tort; Damages; Legislation; Plaintiff; Certainty; Publishing; High Court; Harm; Political science; Exclusive jurisdiction; Common law; Project commissioning; Legal certainty; Liability","score_opus":0.06615435756069121,"score_gpt":0.3853155047127825,"score_spread":0.31916114715209126,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1533771626","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6432474,0.003237824,0.0054010944,0.020038126,0.00012449012,0.00011640885,0.00006721921,0.000027048,0.3277405],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98418355,0.00053493044,0.00097856,0.0023737568,0.00007756539,0.000041727268,0.000014375766,0.0000071763866,0.011788381],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9844077,0.004852721,0.0011032767,0.0017351765,0.0050562704,0.002844749],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9769751,0.015261231,0.002880489,0.0014570849,0.002092058,0.0013339925],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009685969,0.00014723437,0.00046747125,0.0015964084,0.006572803,0.010373569,0.0015992572,0.005189484,0.0034187832],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029302191,0.000660818,0.00059499545,0.001182647,0.011138188,0.0047840094,0.00593916,0.0061059888,0.00037863373],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001086266,0.000100914396,0.011578149,0.00011065387,0.000038385573,0.0048972466,0.018829858,0.0019092645,0.0018926838,0.93719727,0.0030499285,0.020287035],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020798374,0.00049953227,0.1036066,0.0011083701,0.00032408995,0.006155686,0.0239927,0.015026747,0.006439873,0.6132422,0.22889335,0.00050281937],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.054120824,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.085763015,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.054120824,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008259227,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0073156315,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.107611656},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1537997761","doi":"10.71781/2285","title":"De la légitimité du recours à l'action déclaratoire dans les litiges du commerce international","year":2002,"lang":"fr","type":"dissertation","venue":"Open MIND","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"McGill University","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Political science; Law; Conflict of laws; International law; Legitimacy; Context (archaeology); Civil procedure; Action (physics); Politics; Geography; Physics","score_opus":0.05807476188364539,"score_gpt":0.3614719832594583,"score_spread":0.3033972213758129,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1537997761","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.081064574,0.004042699,0.0070106178,0.06358415,0.0009188443,0.00007109727,0.00034169582,0.00007543168,0.84289086],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8560813,0.0017439614,0.0014595382,0.008296691,0.00038125977,0.00006352179,0.00016506731,0.000072699026,0.13173594],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98643523,0.0029277054,0.00043575885,0.002053864,0.00543065,0.0027167406],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9706819,0.0133653255,0.002500802,0.0028645366,0.008980763,0.0016065639],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012174177,0.0004598233,0.0005644183,0.0024472135,0.0137355365,0.020847263,0.001753439,0.006570923,0.01566945],"category_scores_gemma":[0.034753494,0.0005179938,0.0005984953,0.0026463794,0.02895296,0.005086698,0.0052629313,0.0101233665,0.001336058],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029727626,0.000013616569,0.0051917443,0.00008608916,0.000022430197,0.00029132894,0.01670429,0.00017864034,0.0002052339,0.950944,0.016212795,0.010120085],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006077734,0.000047436697,0.033715766,0.0014175657,0.00014046708,0.00043859036,0.026483659,0.0014810192,0.0014249411,0.1485203,0.7860877,0.00018184535],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5585391,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5966946,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5585391,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.025849307,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.038998332,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8881215},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1538149780","doi":"","title":"Cameras in the Courtroom in the Twenty-First Century: The U.S. Supreme Court Learning from Abroad?","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Political science; Economic Justice; Human rights; Court of record; Original jurisdiction","score_opus":0.024478637445492345,"score_gpt":0.29717299224864313,"score_spread":0.2726943548031508,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1538149780","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4378912,0.02909883,0.00095383194,0.20352562,0.0010733511,0.000012479383,0.00007896388,0.000032773514,0.32733294],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9697356,0.0065107876,0.00018004228,0.012507521,0.00016920794,0.000007713166,0.000026481424,0.000018124396,0.010844325],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976427,0.0011229089,0.000054863194,0.00030257864,0.00030110165,0.0005758223],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99590176,0.0014732557,0.00037598357,0.00021658553,0.00054564845,0.0014867468],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004160294,0.00018932961,0.00033689258,0.0011019317,0.009803441,0.011129357,0.00084472366,0.0035760351,0.009187076],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009612783,0.00023859333,0.00020403751,0.0012504434,0.017765848,0.012654048,0.00473676,0.0069448906,0.00048701104],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012484283,0.00020327112,0.014346492,0.00011244995,0.000025584653,0.0014114677,0.26348764,0.00031295762,0.00041825473,0.48713434,0.06349153,0.16893117],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025049316,0.00015855514,0.021107152,0.0016007455,0.00003179594,0.0007735485,0.3881214,0.0002010604,0.0006293282,0.08531377,0.50194216,0.00009546758],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.058486186,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14506699,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.058486186,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006967889,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0066516595,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11629152},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1543124388","doi":"","title":"Staking Claims Against Foreign Defendants in Canada: Choice of Law and Jurisdiction Issues Arising from the in Personam Exception to the Mocambique Rule for Foreign Immovables","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Law; Subject-matter jurisdiction; Subject matter; Political science; Original jurisdiction","score_opus":0.025869041149856335,"score_gpt":0.2810066826580067,"score_spread":0.2551376415081504,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1543124388","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7387027,0.006616745,0.0019161821,0.051622428,0.00020871671,0.00017260456,0.0005060598,0.000057151574,0.20019744],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9728564,0.002426851,0.0010436631,0.0050621564,0.00004105746,0.000021268666,0.00010800254,0.000019078914,0.018421529],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9928625,0.000405849,0.00021204769,0.00053618196,0.0027983128,0.0031849588],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99303246,0.0024140675,0.00056392484,0.00017547286,0.0025299161,0.0012842186],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038200188,0.00037377444,0.0006268235,0.0029254784,0.028523583,0.011316651,0.0030286827,0.006014242,0.0042104386],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018292284,0.00065588695,0.0006874052,0.0036650714,0.008877864,0.0020348306,0.0042227097,0.0069227894,0.00026112434],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003328337,0.00016561219,0.111457005,0.00043345286,0.00017980907,0.009616898,0.059326474,0.0043267766,0.0023334133,0.6565121,0.06704514,0.0882705],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021365209,0.00019455972,0.36307025,0.0017879737,0.0009215007,0.0032889897,0.17259437,0.017933415,0.0051682563,0.09554998,0.33834982,0.0009271676],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9956317,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99862397,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12697056,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.12697056,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.20106317,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9212402},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1543518960","doi":"10.54648/aila2014005","title":"Summary of MC99 Judicial Updates 2013","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Air and Space Law","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.009011196931635462,"score_gpt":0.26001413831395365,"score_spread":0.25100294138231816,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1543518960","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0054821433,0.03447097,0.0029619008,0.08152871,0.08372431,0.0014895325,0.035370484,0.0019958501,0.7529762],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.027969303,0.029848047,0.006203307,0.08762067,0.038057834,0.0013952143,0.018110419,0.0013734945,0.78942174],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97835165,0.0010616103,0.0009939028,0.0011407678,0.016573193,0.0018789455],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9725496,0.0043323883,0.0011195615,0.0010300947,0.01993041,0.0010379665],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010915128,0.0012169969,0.0011162497,0.014342206,0.007292118,0.012074023,0.0047845906,0.0077513363,0.044454794],"category_scores_gemma":[0.032245412,0.0013559737,0.0019682269,0.011367505,0.0015441116,0.0027320476,0.0023668928,0.00844161,0.023310963],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019709145,0.000028446204,0.00012285121,0.00012065005,0.0000093994395,0.00007319548,0.00006361231,0.0001285389,0.0001749363,0.0044295536,0.9792276,0.015601608],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011071515,0.000013832796,0.0015405529,0.00021560684,0.000017320572,0.000022596856,0.000048225796,0.00008312478,0.00034838635,0.00036540948,0.9973055,0.00002833905],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2564791,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3858667,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2564791,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.020833,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.026234465,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.50997245},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1544830617","doi":"","title":"Canadian Competition Authority’s Reach for Foreign Affiliates in its Cartel Investigations","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Antitrust chronicle","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cartel; Competition (biology); Competition law; Liability; Business; Price fixing; Economics; Law and economics; International trade; Law; Political science; Market economy; Accounting; Industrial organization; Collusion; Monopoly","score_opus":0.029223051190185596,"score_gpt":0.31262913766199263,"score_spread":0.28340608647180704,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1544830617","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.031077504,0.0021579093,0.0013147461,0.08024133,0.0014633815,0.00013573444,0.0016256219,0.00022059164,0.88176316],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.35795012,0.002342513,0.0033745165,0.052061975,0.00038451146,0.00009680728,0.0009425317,0.00013607975,0.58271104],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9909603,0.00036403775,0.00018464324,0.00049958006,0.0054971,0.0024942523],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9826277,0.0030388113,0.00045394935,0.000570348,0.011130595,0.0021786941],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035187239,0.0003960017,0.0004621353,0.0022065444,0.022481225,0.006928509,0.0015220672,0.006809212,0.024074934],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013172223,0.000546922,0.0007588682,0.0022976932,0.003449489,0.0014563327,0.0017900885,0.0057515604,0.002139739],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000060403563,0.00005041134,0.007520784,0.0001374048,0.000023915502,0.00058414025,0.0029728927,0.00027691253,0.0015828473,0.3211769,0.6365425,0.029070817],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014962871,0.000019537143,0.012415641,0.000096943,0.000033928405,0.00012495398,0.0010942369,0.00042229198,0.000782102,0.004538621,0.9803946,0.000062190724],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9815161,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9927129,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04356202,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04356202,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.16212925,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3160661},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1549841706","doi":"","title":"Thinking Globally, Acting Locally: Recent Trends in the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments in Canada","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Enforcement; Jurisdiction; Political science; Conflict of laws; Law; Discretion; Comity; Legislature; Law and economics; Economics","score_opus":0.03635448826506476,"score_gpt":0.27538481644073515,"score_spread":0.23903032817567038,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1549841706","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16632412,0.25582275,0.0032282125,0.30554342,0.002999251,0.000238405,0.003454193,0.00027850078,0.2621112],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.77405983,0.15527564,0.004018138,0.029610207,0.00055692927,0.00007164776,0.0013793809,0.00022432064,0.034803856],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.983195,0.0009018023,0.0006751399,0.0014698077,0.010559807,0.0031984781],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94739515,0.0071923193,0.0027820948,0.0005975042,0.03449933,0.007533565],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008788154,0.00042926654,0.0008551719,0.0074123153,0.0141469,0.012688356,0.0047721504,0.0031647019,0.006678437],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026190791,0.0007124993,0.0007770386,0.016193677,0.009541704,0.0028126396,0.0026877183,0.0056614596,0.00045860856],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028102484,0.00020198997,0.077281594,0.0025845065,0.00024183889,0.0019552659,0.028891522,0.00330231,0.0015198037,0.25808668,0.2563825,0.36927098],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000056310902,0.000082468934,0.20831262,0.0021961422,0.00019813253,0.0006084222,0.024097752,0.0019029586,0.0013440159,0.0065975725,0.7542113,0.00039218215],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99836713,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.999244,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3547418,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.3547418,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.45264494,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7484081},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1550097599","doi":"","title":"Developing Case Law: The Future of Consultation and Accommodation","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Doctrine; Law; Accommodation; Duty; Political science; Legal doctrine; Politics; Common law; Psychology","score_opus":0.016873716296613585,"score_gpt":0.2854745660805662,"score_spread":0.2686008497839526,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1550097599","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0055667562,0.034497947,0.09533436,0.6910218,0.0018810771,0.00035268813,0.000073010175,0.00034463775,0.17092764],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6279898,0.051819917,0.20671824,0.07786095,0.005045671,0.0018311788,0.00027388317,0.00036604685,0.028094346],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.8174853,0.15083672,0.00448978,0.0053982306,0.0145774875,0.0072124507],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6531327,0.28614902,0.008424038,0.016017826,0.019844731,0.016431784],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.21615386,0.0011045076,0.0024613556,0.0072624916,0.013869301,0.034647767,0.012441149,0.030347154,0.017409418],"category_scores_gemma":[0.222532,0.0012023568,0.0012012973,0.005277425,0.087981604,0.056950666,0.028310433,0.020258797,0.0032516997],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001658137,0.00006778403,0.000194652,0.00024287222,0.0000046999194,0.00015710588,0.0057920674,0.0006122667,0.000045144945,0.91500914,0.017587729,0.060270146],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002574909,0.000024958135,0.000112893365,0.00086331187,0.0000022789563,0.00012684194,0.0068751583,0.001111125,0.00006265326,0.8696903,0.12106917,0.000035631336],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012677841,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0065324786,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21615386,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.023888562,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05224441,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9666218},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1553483483","doi":"","title":"Punitive Damages Revisited: Taking the Rationale for Non-Recognition of Foreign Judgments Too Far","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Punitive damages; Supreme court; Law; Political science; Damages; Common law; Jurisprudence; Legislature; Enforcement; Legislation","score_opus":0.040652471374308184,"score_gpt":0.30795637019792793,"score_spread":0.26730389882361977,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1553483483","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03346856,0.008685117,0.07047086,0.21819632,0.0053299502,0.0001879848,0.00008065703,0.00015303183,0.66342753],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8757417,0.0022147156,0.009208694,0.06971415,0.0031942981,0.0002834833,0.000025096731,0.0001530842,0.039464794],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9812238,0.0060076662,0.00084747165,0.0041732457,0.005676112,0.0020716882],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98102784,0.011779733,0.0012838563,0.0017271736,0.0033878847,0.00079356646],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018120755,0.0009867464,0.0012242157,0.0023413373,0.010839426,0.015799517,0.004897317,0.027563758,0.004611301],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03670369,0.0008032887,0.0014983667,0.0011907257,0.04831969,0.015503117,0.008801632,0.038522623,0.0009394948],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005346724,0.0000047976196,0.00013913857,0.000009764525,0.0000044141675,0.00009829925,0.00056879874,0.000097768774,0.000055929,0.9961015,0.0014416694,0.0014726204],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000041146897,0.000044308676,0.0005550834,0.00030121303,0.000039129573,0.00039389564,0.0011777312,0.0015019788,0.0006616533,0.9099306,0.08527274,0.000080674894],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013927891,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020283898,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027563758,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008993262,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009565311,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.095832825},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1554608732","doi":"","title":"General Report on Common Law Countries, New Trends in Procedure","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Civil law (Civil law); Law; Common law; Res judicata; Comparative law; Political science; Jurisprudence; Public law; Municipal law; Private law; Civil procedure; Sociology","score_opus":0.024907821681667736,"score_gpt":0.34494966618783873,"score_spread":0.320041844506171,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1554608732","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0075679934,0.057462245,0.0061957627,0.02479943,0.014555151,0.0010239719,0.061292317,0.0018945163,0.82520854],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.027960978,0.059049193,0.01103796,0.004263143,0.003002176,0.0010794076,0.09454445,0.0012723074,0.79779047],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.993763,0.000695526,0.0005122109,0.00060132,0.0038408914,0.00058702286],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9915868,0.0011056117,0.00096001656,0.0009966565,0.0047559226,0.00059498346],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005233313,0.00090742344,0.00066633354,0.009365313,0.0016369099,0.0065900376,0.001559138,0.0017026268,0.054312382],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008624806,0.00077717716,0.00077224633,0.013589013,0.0009604481,0.006556542,0.0028512313,0.0031486063,0.022021437],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000043452423,0.000046202575,0.001050031,0.00041618658,0.000008184644,0.000049616276,0.00044022966,0.00024580056,0.0003053878,0.02769593,0.88562006,0.0840789],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002246347,0.000014957913,0.0022889941,0.0001676168,0.000003659726,0.000031841086,0.0002248034,0.00001809314,0.00009538012,0.0005710089,0.996576,0.0000053691724],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.037598383,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02900672,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.054312382,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0053371214,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0140919015,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18169302},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1557609286","doi":"","title":"Book Review: Agreements on Jurisdictions and Choice of Law by Adrian Briggs, Oxford University Press","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Choice of law; Jurisdiction; Law; Legislature; Conflict of laws; Political science; Commonwealth; Nothing; Common law; Subject matter; Freedom of contract; Law and economics; Economics","score_opus":0.008154255014607616,"score_gpt":0.27149145577942946,"score_spread":0.26333720076482187,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1557609286","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000118434546,0.90327144,0.0005004865,0.026206903,0.014340399,0.000029626432,0.00030297102,0.000046875935,0.055182796],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.002732849,0.8241177,0.00074267306,0.011749544,0.009754697,0.00008863973,0.0005528457,0.00008195428,0.15017904],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99849474,0.00032331113,0.0001379324,0.00017622097,0.0007641007,0.0001037318],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99672145,0.0018570024,0.00019385196,0.000118888274,0.0009406259,0.00016834668],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012178991,0.0013295253,0.0016141583,0.0044904817,0.0012605907,0.004934769,0.0013918637,0.0026355004,0.036632925],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005687557,0.0009678242,0.00065160566,0.0075342767,0.0024892348,0.005522342,0.0014438934,0.0042473814,0.019707318],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000072000867,0.000006084211,0.00003827814,0.0004880002,0.000004417455,0.000016488866,0.00008232577,0.00009739919,0.000024983809,0.009367737,0.95635474,0.033512373],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000035429757,0.0000030836295,0.00018112257,0.0009423482,0.0000030893661,0.000047849386,0.000062080944,0.000016286253,0.000010270632,0.0033328999,0.9953923,0.0000052107434],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0186864,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03195362,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.036632925,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0043067145,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0068944064,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.122549355},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1567178154","doi":"","title":"International and Domestic Selective Adaptation: The Case of Charter 08","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Political science; Legitimacy; Normative; Law and economics; Politics; Interpretation (philosophy); Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.014339180715235657,"score_gpt":0.3028290416689316,"score_spread":0.28848986095369594,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1567178154","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.27880302,0.00060065795,0.0053680562,0.018624758,0.0002437382,0.00010201766,0.000038572198,0.00009162053,0.6961276],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9586592,0.00022408931,0.0012855064,0.002759794,0.00008528441,0.00008922537,0.000024142331,0.000045740184,0.036827043],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99339265,0.0029973234,0.00014579395,0.00094215624,0.00086425006,0.0016578584],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971251,0.001162247,0.00032632882,0.0008005819,0.00034143598,0.00024442087],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007830193,0.00033935983,0.00037662926,0.0011268369,0.015957294,0.007526362,0.0014942233,0.0054594716,0.0047936356],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0097511215,0.00029777954,0.0005009966,0.0017335833,0.024037164,0.0070723156,0.008346771,0.007531727,0.00044522755],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010288266,0.000014686722,0.00062960375,0.000009075139,0.000001907366,0.0010548782,0.038831163,0.00014002714,0.000110822046,0.9516804,0.0030701752,0.00444702],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000034836783,0.00008706725,0.004852331,0.0001667433,0.000025462015,0.0015592237,0.060587596,0.002905428,0.0012665403,0.28953066,0.63886124,0.00012291971],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.030986354,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024078859,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030986354,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010011221,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0073430073,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07263684},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1575560588","doi":"","title":"Tales, Techs and Territories: Private International Law, Globalization and the Legal Construction of Borderlessness on the Internet","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law and Contemporary Problems","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ontario Tech University","funders":"","keywords":"Narrative; Rhetorical question; The Internet; Relation (database); Globalization; Political science; Law; Sociology; Law and economics; Media studies; Literature; Art; Computer science","score_opus":0.02231019237107384,"score_gpt":0.24536371277368973,"score_spread":0.2230535204026159,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1575560588","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19020398,0.011894766,0.01936898,0.10352671,0.00038068276,0.00004397307,0.000049954193,0.000068458394,0.6744625],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9892926,0.0011810834,0.00077196216,0.0021131136,0.00010660505,0.000022450835,0.00000802782,0.000017747492,0.006486327],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963659,0.0024062803,0.00009319676,0.00024475614,0.0005212737,0.00036844812],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9955048,0.00309781,0.00045753442,0.00036210867,0.0002678982,0.00031002556],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038903262,0.00025727073,0.00032238488,0.0026192502,0.011176007,0.018295558,0.0010159735,0.005071274,0.0035160831],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006715396,0.00027891985,0.00025176798,0.0023341707,0.1011,0.017780831,0.008342959,0.004608483,0.0002387959],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000020840835,0.0000038743347,0.0001268316,0.0000065751474,6.01339e-7,0.000041439856,0.014010036,0.00003429511,0.000018109224,0.9838988,0.00076532003,0.0010919906],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009598989,0.000013057402,0.0006366966,0.00018173353,0.000004451943,0.00019822357,0.054936033,0.00032320694,0.00011466874,0.87058455,0.07298279,0.000014879106],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005755172,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006383719,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018295558,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004871951,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034855523,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.035348654},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1575733700","doi":"","title":"Issue #8 - March 17, 2004","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pro Tem","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Autonomy; Newspaper; Media studies; Art history; Humanities; Art; Political science; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.02734815451259263,"score_gpt":0.32702851939578614,"score_spread":0.2996803648831935,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1575733700","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0011932333,0.0032994933,0.00022761596,0.012064909,0.045160975,0.00033583556,0.0043530473,0.0010712029,0.9322938],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0009809474,0.00052947545,0.00004715355,0.0011453545,0.0015755332,0.000030480005,0.000820388,0.00006058321,0.9948101],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995117,0.0000385299,0.000017682176,0.00007230931,0.0002554972,0.000104379746],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983126,0.00020650645,0.000052602652,0.00010728873,0.00083122123,0.0004897309],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00073215266,0.0009860557,0.00075417996,0.001346663,0.0017796542,0.00596305,0.0014204815,0.0029254574,0.664909],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026817098,0.00038778063,0.0005400432,0.0009650214,0.0005190339,0.0015216969,0.0009380981,0.002110234,0.5532997],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005167228,0.000029799685,0.00014291971,0.00007053864,0.0000024195165,0.0000317999,0.0000139528,0.000014315538,0.00010848078,0.0003649898,0.98521614,0.013952928],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019217905,0.000037069494,0.0014111253,0.000149411,0.00000283648,0.000019982355,0.000065791995,0.000039874765,0.00010958364,0.0001399742,0.99799997,0.000005214742],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008054559,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02695121,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.664909,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002080041,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014378135,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4779666},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1583191926","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1195","title":"Freedom of Expression and Location: Are There Constitutional Dead Zones?","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Charter; Law; Commonwealth; Freedom of expression; Political science; Government (linguistics); High Court; Scope (computer science); Expression (computer science); Section (typography); Philosophy; Human rights; Business","score_opus":0.028745747575105944,"score_gpt":0.31092291435199476,"score_spread":0.2821771667768888,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1583191926","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06043924,0.014119574,0.056452308,0.14355643,0.0010058754,0.00012327281,0.0005958052,0.00012873915,0.7235787],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9578021,0.0029079146,0.0060982443,0.011357551,0.000650417,0.00023758967,0.0001528464,0.000066916706,0.02072645],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9905453,0.0034693826,0.0005242358,0.001596611,0.0017521575,0.0021123125],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9927918,0.0037459382,0.0006639103,0.0013785565,0.00078530697,0.0006345821],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009214392,0.00065069465,0.0012903719,0.0013945743,0.0072036097,0.016583757,0.0035464715,0.009358595,0.009231351],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015493512,0.0006153554,0.0010555162,0.001786187,0.066209726,0.020644447,0.008739285,0.011356612,0.0013796451],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000042856495,0.0000035091152,0.00006113639,0.000009093275,0.0000017730699,0.000010405934,0.00032092741,0.000044690813,0.000028883436,0.99737775,0.0006211271,0.0015163658],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028163573,0.000019424351,0.00040757866,0.00013201972,0.00001201726,0.00005545496,0.0017463155,0.00013996822,0.00018699314,0.9574252,0.039820634,0.000026283578],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01484575,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014114443,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016583757,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0066344407,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008694001,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04873091},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1586401760","doi":"10.1515/9783866539471","title":"Ausländisches Privat- und Privatverfahrensrecht in deutscher Sprache","year":2011,"lang":"de","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.06061242321787522,"score_gpt":0.3173953480208124,"score_spread":0.25678292480293713,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1586401760","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008594025,0.08724016,0.0014338361,0.008025021,0.0021484375,0.0000146406655,0.00083738903,0.00017646301,0.8915301],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.12030418,0.051777598,0.0018408275,0.0014578736,0.00039211125,0.00002583589,0.0009134984,0.0001464429,0.8231416],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994748,0.00008934846,0.000035540193,0.00008312561,0.00021365867,0.00010355987],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998325,0.000049929557,0.000029432967,0.000023470886,0.00003128176,0.000033402088],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00035963944,0.00042462282,0.0002722169,0.0010237274,0.0013183672,0.0039736396,0.00027450177,0.00073344633,0.03196309],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006482901,0.00031083505,0.0001751243,0.0021591913,0.0012815349,0.002321101,0.0010277898,0.0018126027,0.0122978315],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002388764,0.00004359576,0.00088427536,0.00027216267,0.000008738322,0.00020524244,0.0030035654,0.00048354836,0.00054161064,0.46801865,0.3903936,0.13612112],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000001465483,0.0000039181346,0.0009287125,0.000099339944,0.0000014929368,0.0001542152,0.00050196366,0.000045244764,0.000103699116,0.005793415,0.99236286,0.0000036022439],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01701662,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.029998014,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03196309,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003137552,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00284225,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10692716},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1588678454","doi":"","title":"Gérald Goldstein et Ethel Groffier. \"Traité de droit civil -Droit international privé\".","year":2004,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law; Philosophy; Humanities","score_opus":0.01164960271739483,"score_gpt":0.26798817062653496,"score_spread":0.2563385679091401,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1588678454","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.003654301,0.4745519,0.0017602026,0.3991632,0.016941827,0.00007101807,0.00062966096,0.0001427038,0.10308528],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.12890781,0.3155512,0.0032893603,0.23052666,0.013100066,0.00023200653,0.00053636014,0.0003237933,0.30753273],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972608,0.0009434633,0.00019554373,0.00027032662,0.00096848863,0.0003612359],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967325,0.0022553331,0.00026840775,0.00010382975,0.00047181704,0.00016815102],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022336822,0.0014841548,0.0005632846,0.0025893582,0.004196834,0.0031752067,0.002033222,0.015436078,0.011250618],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007625694,0.00056323386,0.00039732293,0.0031107143,0.003288744,0.005152293,0.0023477997,0.0059079737,0.0041716667],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000054942677,0.000031951895,0.00082403375,0.00024138957,0.000014321053,0.00028817295,0.003785467,0.000080098405,0.00008204841,0.09035114,0.85811776,0.0461288],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028639375,0.000021912152,0.0048669972,0.0007964318,0.000019489256,0.0003462093,0.003775833,0.000079236794,0.00040565716,0.02790419,0.9617087,0.000046732723],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06991421,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14548483,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06991421,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026195042,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021544502,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13901454},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W159121398","doi":"","title":"Introductory Note - Supreme Court of Canada: R. v. Hape","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Legal Materials","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.011599351063382408,"score_gpt":0.2886310946262413,"score_spread":0.2770317435628589,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W159121398","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015013031,0.0061022425,0.0016950796,0.33316392,0.0044887606,0.00040678575,0.00829666,0.0002524687,0.6305811],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.18569686,0.0052020214,0.003648613,0.39816839,0.0022813068,0.00031525205,0.0016803681,0.00020056678,0.40280658],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99601775,0.00024616433,0.00011929504,0.00038529074,0.0017816105,0.0014498791],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961874,0.001287296,0.00010035084,0.000103234604,0.0019551413,0.00036661746],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020354553,0.0006463983,0.0008017825,0.0018014386,0.016694767,0.0071980357,0.003492125,0.015219177,0.027201338],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0088685425,0.000678472,0.0011419496,0.00249576,0.004008829,0.0025015278,0.0017812348,0.011679891,0.0036864008],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000045544195,0.000041306597,0.0017940319,0.00010340333,0.000025274161,0.00048136248,0.0012147997,0.00022804481,0.0004327018,0.20715784,0.78176904,0.006706647],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012352533,0.0000537807,0.015411979,0.0007106457,0.000116152136,0.00029882966,0.0043016193,0.00067462993,0.0014244537,0.06114466,0.9155608,0.00017885011],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9373749,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97480834,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06262511,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03507255,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07149475,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25447035},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1591884389","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v31i1.4321","title":"ASSUMING REGULATORY AUTHORITY FOR TRANSNATIONAL TORTS: AN INTERSTATE AFFAIR? A HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE ON THE CANADIAN PRIVATE INTERNATIONAL LAW TORT RULES","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Tort; Perspective (graphical); Law; Political science; Conflict of laws; Private law; Public authority; Public law; Law and economics; Economics; Liability","score_opus":0.05363717620028837,"score_gpt":0.3399906221544078,"score_spread":0.28635344595411943,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1591884389","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.023285612,0.010441355,0.009673036,0.048241973,0.0004553382,0.000050934777,0.00022001212,0.000067644105,0.90756404],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.84987986,0.010995927,0.0033259129,0.01402565,0.00056524423,0.00009264988,0.00019765345,0.00010946369,0.12080759],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99262846,0.00079565315,0.00015143858,0.00089830393,0.0028031333,0.0027229623],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99647164,0.0013002488,0.00022864625,0.00028539763,0.0013653613,0.00034869343],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038089552,0.0004431722,0.0003828576,0.0030142502,0.019487804,0.016896797,0.0023548712,0.006102318,0.004050202],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0067919386,0.0006055278,0.0004982459,0.0030688972,0.039799727,0.0067720115,0.0032912586,0.010162086,0.00042058603],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001023753,0.0000020774748,0.000067973626,0.000005236821,7.697103e-7,0.000031325693,0.00253452,0.000066175475,0.000028652274,0.99354726,0.0020282117,0.0016866751],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011797486,0.000017691775,0.0040062903,0.00031897522,0.000028383949,0.0001961674,0.0074866125,0.0010706353,0.0005144331,0.3691045,0.6171523,0.00009224754],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.93843496,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.94292367,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9224049,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07759509,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06336641,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5629944},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1597733011","doi":"10.54648/joia2008054","title":"The Implementation of the New York Convention in Canada","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International Arbitration","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Convention; Enforcement; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.019834840425142986,"score_gpt":0.29783089158129056,"score_spread":0.27799605115614756,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1597733011","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12346096,0.009922779,0.0066041932,0.12302521,0.0033214681,0.0006738808,0.0008869534,0.00017170746,0.7319329],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6803562,0.0049026185,0.008470205,0.026413657,0.00031193695,0.00018740392,0.00038237582,0.00010984155,0.27886578],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98559326,0.0012052102,0.0004965084,0.0011190253,0.0071321237,0.0044538635],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98949665,0.0014314568,0.0005249824,0.0002951517,0.006669894,0.0015817997],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007227715,0.00033469347,0.00046393237,0.0014164627,0.02222275,0.013155592,0.0017253606,0.003962477,0.004315034],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013680712,0.0006786838,0.00053302175,0.0017164154,0.008180869,0.0019046674,0.003055582,0.007140716,0.00031993174],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006807222,0.000056074146,0.0082425745,0.00009935461,0.00004011178,0.0008195498,0.010881008,0.001251332,0.0018518558,0.8413595,0.09332831,0.042002354],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004690988,0.000047972928,0.022618454,0.00019406519,0.000036236568,0.00010650986,0.0051199025,0.0010158364,0.0016276687,0.009103276,0.95985734,0.00022582914],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9938029,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.996354,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16023327,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.16023327,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.29543382,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97401035},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1598422837","doi":"10.1016/b978-0-08-097086-8.86123-1","title":"Law and Geography","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Elsevier eBooks","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Geography; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.028008142015385592,"score_gpt":0.2829836082983853,"score_spread":0.2549754662829997,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1598422837","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00039992048,0.02401076,0.0010759747,0.0022774062,0.0004657129,0.000015783631,0.0001416951,0.000052308726,0.9715604],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.018358668,0.01935223,0.0013171273,0.0010095135,0.0005191723,0.00007044324,0.00025100418,0.000117303054,0.9590045],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996178,0.00010376709,0.00001927406,0.00009446064,0.00012986519,0.0000347674],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999788,0.000087667904,0.000015928465,0.000038592036,0.000045567172,0.000024291507],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003922068,0.0009388788,0.00067244546,0.0014056969,0.0015212427,0.005028996,0.00065871095,0.0018704063,0.11545492],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013495845,0.0003924847,0.00023471784,0.002981342,0.0034480907,0.0042699957,0.0020990826,0.002440124,0.0286257],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008313516,0.000021039808,0.00016468718,0.00015853028,0.0000049620458,0.00004419086,0.0010069225,0.00022721846,0.000190745,0.6943043,0.20087783,0.10299133],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000032682537,0.0000035838716,0.0001991,0.000211057,0.0000020929954,0.00003618371,0.0002338629,0.000070068796,0.000029509505,0.119110264,0.8800978,0.000003311879],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013472242,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.025453394,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11545492,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003353396,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021820052,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38623518},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1599213758","doi":"10.18800/derechopucp.200001.018","title":"Le nouveau Code de Procédure civile francais, vingt-cinq ans apre' s","year":2000,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Derecho PUCP","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Patheon (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Art","score_opus":0.014121779348253833,"score_gpt":0.27350681370339475,"score_spread":0.25938503435514093,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1599213758","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.061945666,0.010888506,0.006278694,0.08997353,0.014019892,0.0003340986,0.0071428213,0.00039583768,0.8090209],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.19004273,0.003610789,0.0049302755,0.01326402,0.00088992267,0.00039900173,0.0020466826,0.00023469795,0.78458196],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99235123,0.0014833577,0.00072561286,0.0007700488,0.002961843,0.0017079044],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9908063,0.0022809454,0.0006437698,0.0007084903,0.004983255,0.0005773],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0048749642,0.00051029515,0.00041356735,0.0015899234,0.0073073176,0.006086351,0.0011707804,0.004166713,0.020823713],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014914005,0.00044663905,0.00070969743,0.002208848,0.0026723947,0.0018863874,0.001626004,0.0054834858,0.0042253374],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012267209,0.00006890888,0.0062274355,0.00023732142,0.000030099121,0.0005812045,0.0068863914,0.00032851615,0.0024471325,0.60479444,0.3240652,0.054210622],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009008173,0.000019602894,0.0086186305,0.00014619011,0.000006924204,0.00012210471,0.0008317212,0.00007604341,0.0005846244,0.0024316586,0.9871214,0.000032047315],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6271739,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.62953806,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6271739,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017535744,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.040014084,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7500435},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1604660447","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1226","title":"Equal Autonomy in Canadian Federalism: The Continuing Search for Balance in the Interpretation of the Division of Powers","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Law; Federalism; Political science; Supreme court; Exclusive jurisdiction; Federal jurisdiction; Autonomy; Constitution; Jurisprudence; Writ; Separation of powers; Politics","score_opus":0.04632363708824638,"score_gpt":0.33090714569516394,"score_spread":0.28458350860691756,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1604660447","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03780632,0.032349303,0.011209588,0.4811604,0.0016429886,0.000063745334,0.00026582155,0.00008901152,0.43541276],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8847258,0.014207965,0.009500981,0.052012622,0.00070939556,0.000058660164,0.00011047865,0.00008148834,0.03859272],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9874495,0.002271742,0.00030216898,0.0012635669,0.0064295656,0.002283347],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99002105,0.004024892,0.00040901054,0.00054679567,0.004029929,0.0009683278],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010015995,0.00030276665,0.0007722666,0.0025799996,0.019148095,0.01192317,0.0024633855,0.0057920692,0.0045874445],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021392694,0.00049268815,0.0006349001,0.0038721801,0.024757026,0.004579619,0.0031525043,0.00986555,0.00026372215],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000070652313,0.0000031610086,0.00035651814,0.000031299212,0.0000064759374,0.000052436564,0.002905909,0.00017279487,0.000060354458,0.9735476,0.013791651,0.009064742],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000052556446,0.000016555497,0.007756532,0.00045900152,0.000047383088,0.000110990055,0.004881386,0.0015120114,0.00028981236,0.48498914,0.49975842,0.00012624433],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97798836,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9890497,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8494944,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1505056,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.18012491,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9852931},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1608848418","doi":"","title":"Goodyear and Nicastro: Observations from a Transnational and Comparative Perspective","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholar Commons (University of South Carolina)","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Supreme court; Law; Political science; Constitution; State (computer science); Perspective (graphical); European union; Club; International trade; Business","score_opus":0.0780719157132222,"score_gpt":0.2815661872234894,"score_spread":0.20349427151026722,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1608848418","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19985212,0.026064085,0.0020736032,0.054012284,0.00033246732,0.000044169792,0.00034488214,0.000015780663,0.7172606],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95062244,0.019443627,0.0011986168,0.012612581,0.00020626333,0.00007797087,0.0002818264,0.00006887221,0.015487892],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9937773,0.0029005043,0.00015891997,0.0006216909,0.0013041425,0.0012376421],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99045897,0.0059437105,0.00085358584,0.000517066,0.0017651492,0.0004615143],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0075076283,0.00030362722,0.0005303255,0.0056766034,0.015788421,0.011584813,0.0018127856,0.004195628,0.007989971],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012096864,0.0003661727,0.0005686393,0.01130646,0.016257994,0.016782397,0.0063939863,0.0082205795,0.0004247552],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003152394,0.000036821322,0.0039454154,0.00016500393,0.000023786944,0.0009022722,0.17468818,0.00012441831,0.00024584855,0.7944765,0.012804358,0.0125558665],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014032252,0.000052304516,0.019584013,0.001217181,0.00006208359,0.0012062441,0.44848633,0.0002115315,0.0007204224,0.05913543,0.4692399,0.00007052842],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.16916025,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.29291424,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16916025,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015326936,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0062097437,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33635128},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1628690444","doi":"","title":"Le Droit International Privé (1/2)","year":2008,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Law and economics; Economics","score_opus":0.012286257796185904,"score_gpt":0.2609161003219632,"score_spread":0.2486298425257773,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1628690444","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0062315892,0.004281353,0.0007885145,0.004045833,0.0008167778,0.00005235343,0.001924932,0.00025220783,0.9816064],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.06288245,0.0019826838,0.00076963124,0.0015177081,0.0002070822,0.00003402693,0.0007261807,0.00012740822,0.9317528],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983596,0.000054545755,0.000026848782,0.00016459645,0.00090940896,0.00048498108],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996295,0.000045756064,0.0000343244,0.000036197685,0.00017302974,0.00008122845],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00065437006,0.0003560012,0.00028527578,0.0014325542,0.0031048434,0.0050039296,0.0007244218,0.0019754875,0.09833076],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001040267,0.00027997943,0.00039625925,0.002242007,0.0012634883,0.0011521226,0.0011454456,0.0027712858,0.020362832],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032484957,0.000023250937,0.0017964765,0.00012417795,0.000008498235,0.00027460436,0.00081720576,0.0002346627,0.001315137,0.63387865,0.28275782,0.078737006],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000024425797,0.0000053477993,0.002077723,0.000028856162,0.0000021193791,0.000091966205,0.00007127271,0.00006166716,0.00022723291,0.0011533436,0.9962715,0.0000065674],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6150926,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6955627,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6150926,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013013482,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013440307,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.77434844},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1629672965","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511490330.004","title":"Family law and the construction of collective identity","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Identity (music); Collective identity; Law and economics; Sociology; Law; Business; Political science; Philosophy; Aesthetics","score_opus":0.021609939604858346,"score_gpt":0.22722807722772953,"score_spread":0.20561813762287118,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1629672965","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.039819945,0.009514722,0.012762601,0.016492205,0.00025585544,0.000035141242,0.000021876367,0.000046877765,0.9210508],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95535105,0.0022084792,0.002802066,0.00060901436,0.000098053344,0.000058982485,0.000018079983,0.000019026047,0.038835257],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980921,0.0011707412,0.00004504093,0.00019424837,0.0002758589,0.00022201681],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992113,0.00034615956,0.0001098692,0.00014409375,0.000080773934,0.00010779081],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028484939,0.00029710578,0.00028703408,0.0012915479,0.006340024,0.0059217117,0.00075060606,0.0015949657,0.0049291905],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003089999,0.00020506965,0.00026023432,0.00085898285,0.041570827,0.0053187804,0.0042962637,0.0019212846,0.00047777026],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000010463524,0.000002717155,0.00007524529,0.000004494672,7.5347754e-7,0.00001940261,0.0033773743,0.00006190884,0.000013823509,0.9928053,0.0006077163,0.00303032],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000034549273,0.000005615982,0.0002817421,0.000049073216,0.0000017955338,0.0000449038,0.0024256196,0.00013924732,0.000038911512,0.94628114,0.050724696,0.000003781451],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006016206,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0044953083,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006340024,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0053369924,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028998621,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.038722694},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1635410169","doi":"10.1163/ej.9789004158825.i-520","title":"State Succession to International Responsibility","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":51,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"State responsibility; State (computer science); International law; Doctrine; Political science; Independence (probability theory); Law; Ecological succession; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.027162323192087143,"score_gpt":0.3673587686274406,"score_spread":0.34019644543535343,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1635410169","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0026375905,0.0065447246,0.0023511213,0.003748615,0.0014177791,0.000020626261,0.000017805198,0.00005189112,0.98320985],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.17601846,0.009561685,0.001281379,0.0035082959,0.0009221438,0.00006351885,0.00007927365,0.000082137354,0.808483],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993368,0.00017442524,0.00002312753,0.00011310304,0.00021587276,0.00013666438],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99969316,0.000090716996,0.00003117505,0.0000502006,0.000082936676,0.00005183263],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006763944,0.00024596913,0.00018096408,0.0006854636,0.0028924223,0.004498098,0.0005180639,0.0011065623,0.0076840324],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014137856,0.0002462805,0.0002053524,0.00084937236,0.0055734175,0.0029981618,0.0021412973,0.003703183,0.0017235827],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002537465,0.000007867333,0.00009198972,0.000015560307,6.813322e-7,0.000021230217,0.0017995108,0.00012349292,0.000032698408,0.9409114,0.042004876,0.014988217],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000027531614,0.000011582801,0.00041902944,0.000109967725,0.0000016866728,0.00007331573,0.00088433304,0.00019253299,0.00011161204,0.12096128,0.8772278,0.0000041225844],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010801245,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016009161,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010801245,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00529398,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0056607053,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.038410723},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1649882548","doi":"10.7202/043716ar","title":"COLLECTIF, L'Internet et le droit : droit français, européen et comparé de l'internet, coll. « Légipresse », Victoires Éditions, Paris, 2001, 486 p., ISBN 2-908056-47-X.","year":2002,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; The Internet; Philosophy; Art; Computer science; Operating system","score_opus":0.015766213444368706,"score_gpt":0.25397122318146864,"score_spread":0.23820500973709993,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1649882548","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0017394113,0.84026945,0.00059135584,0.027025372,0.0034468768,0.00002418944,0.0019797639,0.000089772475,0.12483382],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.040575705,0.59660596,0.0016012555,0.0038943437,0.0029133651,0.00013481248,0.0033530032,0.0003058821,0.35061577],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99837214,0.00033873745,0.00016514774,0.00021085807,0.00071844814,0.00019463133],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984378,0.00050609285,0.00028490106,0.00007086372,0.00049192365,0.00020831902],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001359516,0.0019319693,0.0009800027,0.006981975,0.0033143107,0.008062323,0.0010405598,0.0028001773,0.054949805],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0027463995,0.0006163973,0.00055248337,0.018835641,0.0027540133,0.0091359615,0.0023513953,0.0028425138,0.012944748],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000040817897,0.000020072399,0.0013861181,0.0010381268,0.000030449191,0.00010059648,0.00515237,0.00009474132,0.00017248864,0.053155206,0.8355155,0.1032935],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000027535905,0.0000071655963,0.0033706953,0.0006750327,0.00000585694,0.00012531866,0.0020404942,0.000015599557,0.00005209914,0.0029491158,0.9907437,0.000012104526],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.16249582,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2788347,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16249582,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008795635,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009077511,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32309997},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1654395552","doi":"10.60082/2563-8505.1002","title":"Section 15 Jurisprudence in the Supreme Court of Canada in 2000","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Supreme Court law review","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Defence Research and Development Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Jurisprudence; Section (typography); Law; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.027678093894610904,"score_gpt":0.30503762935548795,"score_spread":0.27735953546087705,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1654395552","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.040548876,0.01926117,0.0026569718,0.10641376,0.0026271269,0.0002638887,0.0017988037,0.00014181256,0.8262875],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4644338,0.0068215663,0.003198506,0.09448346,0.0007283019,0.0002485879,0.00069424766,0.00016048693,0.429231],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9910458,0.00090409076,0.00030045575,0.0013646326,0.0034093913,0.0029757493],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9940697,0.0016599875,0.00020749705,0.00020139114,0.0029877268,0.0008738273],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004993916,0.00082422845,0.00082992564,0.0021187812,0.03408146,0.017812671,0.0030384734,0.015166533,0.007789634],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0119074,0.0009898876,0.00085316517,0.0032122948,0.01360438,0.0029728466,0.0027987529,0.011107249,0.00076690275],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014770365,0.000021926724,0.001070522,0.000035203393,0.000012356234,0.0002600291,0.004890667,0.0002831483,0.00016223332,0.9094394,0.07850309,0.005306797],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004026806,0.000021470134,0.0058950097,0.00042606858,0.000061994855,0.000116342504,0.004452412,0.0010210942,0.00042556683,0.055702854,0.9316798,0.00015730079],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99061114,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9933483,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20552689,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.20552689,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.20593472,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9214762},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W173131517","doi":"","title":"Chronique de droit international privé canadien (2004-2010). Seconde partie: droit civil des provinces canadiennes de common law","year":2011,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Journal du droit international","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law","score_opus":0.019957660859166806,"score_gpt":0.2533819900469439,"score_spread":0.23342432918777709,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W173131517","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.36348867,0.06740723,0.0017760271,0.0112290075,0.0014904552,0.00023898475,0.35336575,0.0009579088,0.20004606],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.74082893,0.02828988,0.0018276132,0.0011238228,0.00033621793,0.00032170163,0.102229215,0.00021160717,0.12483106],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982419,0.00009556807,0.00014240063,0.0002700962,0.00054701196,0.0007030018],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99646616,0.00043149033,0.0011863214,0.00012327393,0.0012946445,0.0004980492],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00071630714,0.00063912413,0.0006308423,0.009404706,0.0016013301,0.0038437415,0.0009937471,0.00072375487,0.015985997],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0038877437,0.00058641314,0.000650641,0.017581396,0.0010529481,0.0018299747,0.0018512118,0.002191496,0.0020367603],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00073388923,0.00015113027,0.40477616,0.0031280732,0.0005395486,0.0010639231,0.010850252,0.005213739,0.0013495606,0.062227868,0.39036226,0.11960357],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002091544,0.000028759581,0.56040895,0.00043207663,0.00005458724,0.000322553,0.004570482,0.00029463155,0.0004227395,0.0005010731,0.43290037,0.000042859054],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8143156,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8435599,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98442405,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015575962,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01610771,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37355578},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1732253618","doi":"","title":"The Exclusion of Property Rights from the Charter: Correcting the Historical Record","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Property (philosophy); Property rights; Law and economics; Political science; Law; Business; Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.01169331621321475,"score_gpt":0.24659498303242947,"score_spread":0.2349016668192147,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1732253618","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.046680007,0.08206889,0.027092032,0.54604506,0.053041507,0.00011887394,0.0017053235,0.00037709167,0.24287122],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7434535,0.05983537,0.030233035,0.044933308,0.034068596,0.00025589694,0.0012907651,0.0013314806,0.08459815],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98019385,0.007924916,0.0024428475,0.0025232271,0.0056400304,0.0012751692],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8789877,0.06468661,0.012265291,0.015183228,0.027176837,0.001700264],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.028837835,0.00050173927,0.0006544898,0.009811225,0.008649377,0.014266542,0.0035912506,0.0073022833,0.005550833],"category_scores_gemma":[0.14558731,0.0006049809,0.00045597265,0.012934814,0.021449188,0.01891224,0.0035085897,0.015433607,0.0009855964],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042626187,0.000018133014,0.0013363188,0.00028819675,0.000012073687,0.00016809472,0.013253835,0.000271927,0.00007786141,0.8098571,0.11724877,0.05742517],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008820192,0.000014747677,0.002585106,0.001662065,0.000020896287,0.00016147931,0.004200503,0.00049100985,0.00065197854,0.057154648,0.93299454,0.00005415383],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04973005,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06854728,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04973005,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009223561,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017276326,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15251082},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1747985514","doi":"10.1515/9780748699544-014","title":"8. Does Intellectual Property Have Personality?","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Edinburgh University Press eBooks","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Intellectual property; Personality; Focus (optics); Law; Property (philosophy); Affect (linguistics); Law and economics; Political science; Psychology; Sociology; Social psychology; Communication; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03767372808145148,"score_gpt":0.24510166474870695,"score_spread":0.20742793666725548,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1747985514","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016402941,0.00991112,0.0013473339,0.051396925,0.0007328901,0.000013149986,0.000046972826,0.000020267697,0.9201283],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7540585,0.010746269,0.0010338469,0.015633358,0.0014626951,0.000049005128,0.00006659805,0.000028655812,0.21692109],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992804,0.00024656212,0.000029313042,0.000093033246,0.0002085149,0.00014225721],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99903214,0.00036564335,0.0001448286,0.00011781446,0.00021399911,0.00012554448],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00091793644,0.00019830026,0.00019253713,0.00048283662,0.0016301484,0.0045111394,0.0003654433,0.001951213,0.0076513747],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024575128,0.00010848245,0.00020297998,0.00055281684,0.010774917,0.0053038974,0.0014861574,0.0017178367,0.0019015074],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007395965,0.000012493512,0.0010205351,0.00004206074,0.0000022736237,0.00011406002,0.0039536306,0.000041938216,0.000069721435,0.95513284,0.019226708,0.020376371],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009042821,0.000034703808,0.0051979446,0.00045484997,0.000007935682,0.0005180327,0.006375747,0.00011813802,0.00026119634,0.45253953,0.5344695,0.000013296207],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035707448,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003608359,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0076513747,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015941269,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014105801,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02559644},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1751178648","doi":"","title":"Earned Citizenship: Property Lessons for Immigration Reform","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Citizenship; Law; Entitlement (fair division); Polity; Political science; Law and economics; Property (philosophy); Property rights; Politics; Sociology; Economics","score_opus":0.1263720727743552,"score_gpt":0.3388844784916508,"score_spread":0.21251240571729563,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1751178648","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.033282656,0.01102485,0.0023976206,0.5523868,0.0018497681,0.000063379426,0.00008122525,0.00006206624,0.39885154],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.84213597,0.0071119727,0.0010664987,0.070007466,0.003206369,0.00017306568,0.000094202725,0.00011483265,0.076089635],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99412495,0.0026278154,0.00015061311,0.0005407824,0.0005513109,0.0020045354],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99243295,0.003327448,0.0004792119,0.00093424506,0.000974652,0.0018514687],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012070622,0.00038426917,0.0007898776,0.0013445216,0.01826557,0.017522966,0.0032360046,0.010326141,0.03583027],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019741358,0.00034020437,0.000886281,0.0017073455,0.034026574,0.024113983,0.012454098,0.012866897,0.0027050017],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017185455,0.00006525704,0.00030165195,0.000027956214,0.00000337183,0.00008575242,0.0027146037,0.00012732651,0.000012597596,0.97024304,0.016685793,0.009715577],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007015113,0.000064505075,0.0009926137,0.0004892594,0.000011211879,0.00006067092,0.015161283,0.00047213244,0.00008656158,0.7242197,0.2583462,0.00002573446],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.026969569,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023661386,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03583027,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012677472,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018984146,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.119864166},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W176148233","doi":"","title":"Security over receivables : an international handbook","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"RePEc: Research Papers in Economics","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Political science; Debt; Economy; Law; Public administration; Geography; Business; Finance; Economics","score_opus":0.04720736020091146,"score_gpt":0.37632341388608337,"score_spread":0.32911605368517194,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W176148233","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0014254836,0.3844531,0.01507943,0.0071941307,0.0043175183,0.0001708817,0.0012186205,0.00070788385,0.58543295],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.010085294,0.48681363,0.018087942,0.004465785,0.0031557193,0.00035232585,0.0024884974,0.0008174723,0.47373334],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99920017,0.00011825757,0.00010693201,0.00012626589,0.00037125667,0.000077035664],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991873,0.00039649758,0.000072616116,0.00008614302,0.00018564478,0.00007174247],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006906741,0.0013942356,0.0009029636,0.004492699,0.0013252407,0.00586716,0.0012554623,0.0024861677,0.043133624],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020582713,0.00086949626,0.0006299996,0.0064261477,0.0016774334,0.008545077,0.0021093395,0.0036916777,0.03025542],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002069867,0.00009068406,0.00022834569,0.0009330005,0.0000068990735,0.00015513954,0.0009538529,0.00095195865,0.0004917606,0.099046946,0.60375214,0.2933686],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000001010099,0.0000072377575,0.00017892255,0.000440863,0.0000013209628,0.00013436524,0.00010996755,0.00005850266,0.00004289005,0.0063290074,0.992691,0.0000050422464],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004161649,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0050670514,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.043133624,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020951899,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035626716,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14429635},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1764567595","doi":"10.3968/j.ccc.1923670020110703.280","title":"The Improvement of Civil Pretrial Procedures in China: the Comparison of Pretrial Procedures in China, Japan and South Korea","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cross-cultural communication","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tribunal; Burden of proof; China; Political science; Civil procedure; Humanities; Law; Legislation; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03422002991347494,"score_gpt":0.34751741511919065,"score_spread":0.3132973852057157,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1764567595","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9936615,0.00085743435,0.0002477126,0.0004561897,0.000016184607,0.00006951656,0.000062576386,0.0000053698227,0.0046235197],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981047,0.0005802317,0.00015634937,0.00013452781,0.000008037555,0.00002894007,0.00006911262,0.000004853499,0.0009132249],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99629253,0.001017298,0.00046949336,0.00026460458,0.0008693318,0.0010866731],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9902514,0.0024193956,0.0035981827,0.0005614656,0.0015984025,0.0015711578],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006702575,0.0002107504,0.00026175872,0.001488162,0.00108812,0.0014523171,0.00068737543,0.00043120855,0.0027042236],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011732867,0.00018365284,0.00055249815,0.0018620018,0.0017786855,0.0012395415,0.0015167161,0.0006184313,0.0001818379],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0017068587,0.00029163004,0.82136154,0.0009028541,0.0002584988,0.0018193336,0.023941742,0.001431747,0.0039041052,0.013183728,0.0023447764,0.1288533],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000396288,0.00030176176,0.98621756,0.0001029492,0.00007616835,0.0003339039,0.007685358,0.00044425408,0.000584093,0.00044634688,0.0037427773,0.000025337238],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.028372306,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.075284235,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028372306,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036654407,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0076731252,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.056414366},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W177438353","doi":"","title":"The Role of International Treaties in the Interpretation of Canadian Intellectual Property Statutes","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statute; Intellectual property; Law; Scope (computer science); Political science; International law; Supreme court; Interpretation (philosophy); Settlement (finance); Statute of limitations; Economics","score_opus":0.005704566361314508,"score_gpt":0.23442236867763405,"score_spread":0.22871780231631955,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W177438353","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0151888905,0.010529239,0.006500345,0.03545432,0.0009286688,0.000041058665,0.00019948081,0.00006545463,0.9310925],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88906515,0.014868767,0.006877068,0.00960753,0.00073413295,0.000074985386,0.0002545928,0.00022429776,0.07829352],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98416996,0.00253851,0.00043725382,0.0010698147,0.0073613795,0.0044230386],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9912515,0.0035597286,0.00050193875,0.00045333803,0.0036364605,0.0005969448],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007893923,0.0007922389,0.0006011039,0.008451095,0.023175472,0.01869265,0.002025181,0.002928161,0.006883096],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018950593,0.0005489712,0.00083268905,0.012810633,0.031680204,0.0057406803,0.0041439706,0.009846736,0.0003669943],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004038132,0.0000022354554,0.00022555467,0.000017195163,0.0000030844487,0.00003124752,0.0038110611,0.00016255052,0.00003275655,0.98321944,0.0049324604,0.0075584366],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000168404,0.00001191907,0.008352933,0.0006485897,0.00006848774,0.00009208767,0.012671623,0.0015565277,0.0004926873,0.38892654,0.5870506,0.00011116891],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97243595,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9827256,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16006146,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.16006146,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12289707,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97420967},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W178271059","doi":"","title":"Constitutional Jurisdiction Over Paracopyright Laws","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionality; Legislation; Law; Political science; Constitution; Doctrine; Context (archaeology); Argument (complex analysis); Legislature; Jurisdiction; Law and economics; Economics","score_opus":0.009051211902454236,"score_gpt":0.28952134262939605,"score_spread":0.2804701307269418,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W178271059","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.083645746,0.002703566,0.013756226,0.016601805,0.0003624846,0.00021402261,0.0006836107,0.00031813397,0.88171434],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9298212,0.0014879832,0.0038917572,0.0050340225,0.00025694197,0.00014656653,0.0002974065,0.00006333377,0.059000667],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9891104,0.0009861768,0.0004750306,0.0016055756,0.004957364,0.002865356],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9860271,0.00509105,0.0006609737,0.0018207504,0.005687155,0.0007130178],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008031725,0.00043343272,0.0005711883,0.0020757122,0.010179262,0.009865769,0.002669274,0.0038696392,0.00810364],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014972501,0.00072638405,0.00062572764,0.0018122386,0.019924397,0.003566323,0.0027793215,0.005104512,0.0007981631],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008695911,0.000007678727,0.00047686533,0.00002057687,0.0000036100603,0.00010785777,0.0015776053,0.00016208441,0.0002871696,0.9906606,0.0022926738,0.0043946253],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001256746,0.00007137991,0.008133337,0.0006061012,0.00015368515,0.0004659827,0.003892479,0.0020905775,0.0034271393,0.43865493,0.54222876,0.00014990302],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.591573,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6180711,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.591573,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.031626366,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.063920885,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.82166463},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1792641851","doi":"","title":"Charting Developments Concerning Punitive Damages: Is the Tide Changing?","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Working Paper Series","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Punitive damages; Damages; Political science; Law; Supreme court","score_opus":0.025414448180818647,"score_gpt":0.269588514230996,"score_spread":0.24417406605017736,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1792641851","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00985292,0.1026813,0.016505422,0.65287256,0.027978266,0.00011151486,0.00031710332,0.00038040025,0.18930045],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.34670934,0.19834433,0.04256043,0.26774156,0.061872225,0.00033325728,0.0009881271,0.0006988438,0.0807519],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97872156,0.0057118265,0.0018859826,0.0025071376,0.009265005,0.0019084577],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.93514645,0.033090394,0.007819112,0.003214003,0.017483791,0.0032462138],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020089898,0.0009676813,0.0012031874,0.0056448225,0.010082217,0.038298093,0.0034757624,0.01752519,0.0075824964],"category_scores_gemma":[0.044792693,0.00080389786,0.0013022609,0.0069843293,0.0177706,0.03870533,0.0057699,0.030728932,0.0019241992],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028420323,0.00008980537,0.0008546734,0.0003204159,0.000012755782,0.00032948487,0.002227758,0.0007856714,0.0003485985,0.7830814,0.114361435,0.09755952],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013348978,0.000096847354,0.0017226208,0.0012222786,0.000016401465,0.00026502548,0.0020680006,0.0003916715,0.000470036,0.11105558,0.8825398,0.00013820978],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019245803,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019281752,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.038298093,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010430459,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.021501832,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10624677},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1797560180","doi":"10.1002/iir.1217","title":"The Extra‐Territoriality of the Statutory Stay in an English Administration","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Insolvency Review","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Territoriality; Statutory law; Administration (probate law); Scope (computer science); Law; Political science; Law and economics; Connection (principal bundle); Business; Sociology; Computer science; Engineering","score_opus":0.03109945387347425,"score_gpt":0.367075164411868,"score_spread":0.33597571053839376,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1797560180","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4065415,0.012668383,0.013073534,0.017087812,0.00030140637,0.000060423263,0.00009553199,0.00002636733,0.550145],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9927967,0.0007788236,0.0005065665,0.00084499194,0.000064434644,0.00001877895,0.000017738972,0.0000048260445,0.004967165],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9914259,0.0044552595,0.0005672946,0.000571102,0.0014242567,0.0015561739],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99305516,0.003707256,0.00085716817,0.0006306868,0.0013185276,0.00043119027],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007130234,0.000113933296,0.00052464736,0.0009917062,0.00309153,0.0050186585,0.00089834374,0.0018163449,0.0033927616],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007562851,0.00025313295,0.00041075028,0.0010176261,0.013179452,0.0028681306,0.0046705413,0.0030318177,0.00029202524],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020187797,0.000012201306,0.001386544,0.000069610156,0.000014231062,0.0002261885,0.004752352,0.00033929825,0.000387021,0.98634434,0.0009925594,0.005455493],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009060384,0.00033149475,0.053859793,0.0025723656,0.00023390383,0.001267739,0.046488065,0.0016873043,0.0016420521,0.47913012,0.41255587,0.00014062741],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016169453,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.033404157,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016169453,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036104496,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005468582,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03770876},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1813004059","doi":"","title":"Judgment in S D Myers, Inc v Canada","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"TDM","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Business","score_opus":0.011114129556833345,"score_gpt":0.26189392930596467,"score_spread":0.25077979974913134,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1813004059","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012341711,0.0029658221,0.0012870033,0.48407045,0.006947435,0.0002456577,0.0015829513,0.00018477564,0.4903741],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.08208684,0.0015635224,0.0013606983,0.56146216,0.001971231,0.0001835245,0.00032478618,0.0001139121,0.35093334],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99330515,0.0005645361,0.00031624176,0.00087127206,0.0027812098,0.0021615797],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9913476,0.0026944017,0.00022891136,0.00020052142,0.00427347,0.0012551845],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038695217,0.00062559464,0.00092457625,0.0018596345,0.020135099,0.009454036,0.0036751833,0.03357776,0.01767782],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022012135,0.0010340307,0.0013400996,0.002047322,0.004399555,0.0027313395,0.0018183646,0.02020148,0.0027432146],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006504783,0.000027720278,0.0018059876,0.000056786557,0.000034443052,0.0003980322,0.0010031274,0.00021748967,0.00032578662,0.13657819,0.85314,0.0063473172],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010475718,0.00004946539,0.0044437796,0.00033760708,0.00013582857,0.00016861052,0.0034164449,0.000650628,0.0006256954,0.025674779,0.9642682,0.00012431732],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.93934095,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97890806,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06065905,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.032082733,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.133864,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23277766},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1836138028","doi":"","title":"'There are Parts of the World were Things are Badly Wrong':Forum Selection Clauses and Unfair Jurisdictions","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Selection (genetic algorithm); Law; Law and economics; Business; Political science; Computer science; Economics; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.014564627366096072,"score_gpt":0.28523456691375476,"score_spread":0.27066993954765867,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1836138028","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.30092272,0.0036765235,0.02210415,0.2269151,0.001157849,0.00009435135,0.00007285368,0.000044421686,0.445012],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9816332,0.00028505226,0.0010886426,0.011396947,0.00021870017,0.000034219793,0.000011218423,0.00001071778,0.0053213444],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9794471,0.0107412515,0.0007172723,0.0012169918,0.0043169237,0.0035604283],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9598287,0.028746663,0.0049762777,0.0017159171,0.002832098,0.0019003036],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.025368277,0.00025088043,0.00049578823,0.0013016162,0.01325363,0.009640989,0.0015286548,0.0103667285,0.005488028],"category_scores_gemma":[0.068078585,0.0003305587,0.0004025046,0.0011728392,0.02929102,0.010171012,0.0062567904,0.009289922,0.00038153608],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000052265415,0.000030360286,0.0033897492,0.000035843095,0.000012848932,0.00052772934,0.04263662,0.00018339584,0.00024127006,0.9352003,0.0070510725,0.010638571],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009860718,0.00006811053,0.0094265705,0.0005203293,0.000040756346,0.00063446624,0.06379525,0.00077684846,0.00065546035,0.8173702,0.10650308,0.000110364475],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01142542,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016777724,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025368277,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032758352,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005813628,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13416183},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1841300529","doi":"","title":"Judicial 'Copying' Does Not Affect Independence or Impartiality: Supreme Court of Canada","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Impartiality; Supreme court; Copying; Law; Political science; Affect (linguistics); Independence (probability theory); Judicial independence; Sociology","score_opus":0.013523042894234632,"score_gpt":0.281805691809006,"score_spread":0.2682826489147714,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1841300529","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19852772,0.003024623,0.0013485835,0.07559188,0.0005575272,0.0001189697,0.00069019495,0.000065677814,0.7200748],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95020497,0.0008947796,0.00048888894,0.01232212,0.00015378051,0.000037721922,0.0001048852,0.000035137837,0.035757612],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98481524,0.0011989679,0.00045923435,0.0018092968,0.0067149876,0.005002193],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9755739,0.010703352,0.0010860278,0.0016813847,0.008655308,0.0023000068],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007939891,0.00034959003,0.0009414859,0.0013417669,0.025524039,0.01344436,0.0031179313,0.010395793,0.01071055],"category_scores_gemma":[0.045976352,0.0006751617,0.0005967788,0.00240815,0.013194387,0.0041065346,0.004075687,0.011849129,0.0007823593],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017390827,0.000057021538,0.010440882,0.0000856193,0.00009515429,0.0012210917,0.0115992045,0.00087936677,0.00072194287,0.8844397,0.073591515,0.016694631],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005548209,0.00015818552,0.06322753,0.0010585194,0.00097621,0.00083787786,0.020172384,0.008664332,0.0052354713,0.3930294,0.505227,0.00085821317],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95917994,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9788153,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.059583586,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.059583586,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.115153775,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.43231124},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1841878223","doi":"","title":"Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments in Canada","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Enforcement; Corporation; Chevron (anatomy); State (computer science); Law; Political science; Obstacle; Law and economics; Business; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.014483324662284743,"score_gpt":0.23996572142701733,"score_spread":0.22548239676473258,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1841878223","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.46002418,0.0064811343,0.0044344887,0.07588079,0.00091862696,0.00038571874,0.00058905885,0.00013864881,0.45114735],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9562386,0.0018294759,0.0011114579,0.0079831295,0.000120167926,0.000039667102,0.00013685104,0.000030202707,0.032510433],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9796118,0.0012411703,0.0006119266,0.0014376835,0.00824946,0.0088478895],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9826868,0.0030896598,0.0016582554,0.0005970294,0.008027675,0.0039405786],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007705773,0.00031012288,0.0006018196,0.0025116976,0.028362656,0.009885608,0.0029105062,0.0042221486,0.0058771973],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029430212,0.0007104601,0.00054222555,0.0030927218,0.007195011,0.0017368086,0.0051270234,0.0073978235,0.00038698112],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022909706,0.00024046312,0.08514878,0.00030296645,0.0001702409,0.0050856983,0.047362294,0.0040425356,0.0022690122,0.58720523,0.13559933,0.13234435],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016548458,0.000128207,0.22894827,0.0010259881,0.00020218307,0.0010331343,0.044335365,0.0069465153,0.0029694326,0.04290528,0.6708282,0.0005119572],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9930816,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9964037,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13236625,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13236625,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.26737356,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9603889},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W185269366","doi":"","title":"Mediation in the Modern Millennium","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Institutional Knowledge (InK) - Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University (Singapore Management University)","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mediation; Context (archaeology); Alternative dispute resolution; Law; Political science; Conciliation; Family mediation; Transformative mediation; Sociology; History","score_opus":0.03048776896849187,"score_gpt":0.23931673461293929,"score_spread":0.20882896564444742,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W185269366","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0647291,0.09187689,0.004105059,0.040502142,0.0013821654,0.00009603521,0.00007513137,0.000062955965,0.7971705],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86780256,0.029333921,0.0029936512,0.0076920292,0.0004757084,0.00016943351,0.000053932377,0.000043157834,0.09143571],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971806,0.001333134,0.00009640654,0.00038340362,0.00037964107,0.00062680757],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99892694,0.00032666826,0.00017459795,0.00019701208,0.00017622262,0.00019856067],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031682146,0.0003018648,0.00032159165,0.0009822634,0.0064109643,0.006917901,0.000640879,0.0024711029,0.008199252],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028408463,0.00023943698,0.00025503244,0.0010321278,0.016013624,0.007074529,0.0066723377,0.003559137,0.0008176488],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009146703,0.000016609025,0.00057765323,0.0000822286,0.0000072888547,0.00016716376,0.035081115,0.00008621783,0.000137676,0.929004,0.007081195,0.027749754],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000052181913,0.000025946074,0.0020240778,0.0005279923,0.0000047325316,0.00025722996,0.011731458,0.00007858009,0.00012605055,0.107248805,0.877953,0.00001697334],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0096784895,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010115633,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0096784895,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007321028,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0053679864,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05311805},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W188080818","doi":"","title":"Judicial Globalization: New Development or Old Wine in New Bottles?","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alexandria (UniSG) (University of St.Gallen)","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Globalization; Law; Human rights; Political science; Conversation; Criminal law; Democracy; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.03379422245828086,"score_gpt":0.2585722732258251,"score_spread":0.22477805076754423,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W188080818","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010574873,0.14843687,0.002953028,0.5945605,0.016805673,0.000030959527,0.00009874364,0.000092889786,0.2264464],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.58812326,0.131454,0.002492524,0.16388252,0.05909348,0.0001564489,0.00022161861,0.00023223017,0.05434391],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9919126,0.0049472447,0.00024856377,0.00067436503,0.0014974695,0.0007197666],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9887489,0.006664657,0.0010931918,0.00095850317,0.0014379934,0.0010966981],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0061422097,0.00047122964,0.0007091712,0.0019905157,0.005212868,0.016846525,0.0017400741,0.006253396,0.012832094],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010029158,0.00028521675,0.0003330539,0.0032571354,0.030817078,0.022815283,0.006949025,0.0075054932,0.0011791105],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015780512,0.000030506573,0.00054372876,0.00024059849,0.000004527742,0.00015209665,0.01021891,0.0000716048,0.00007264714,0.85646796,0.09458906,0.037592497],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007293181,0.000024036888,0.0014040812,0.001423535,0.0000058747514,0.000249089,0.019542336,0.00022829675,0.0001019257,0.15965383,0.8173327,0.000027037413],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026020836,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002736376,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016846525,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0054986146,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037339085,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.042927682},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W189092474","doi":"","title":"The Canadian Legal Perspective on Challenging Enforcement of the $18.2 Billion Ecuadorian Judgment against Chevron - Part II: Foreign Judgment Enforcement Standards in Common Law Canada","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"TDM","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Chevron (anatomy); Perspective (graphical); Enforcement; Law enforcement; Law; Political science; Business; Computer science; Geology","score_opus":0.023351939156314262,"score_gpt":0.29231102144529447,"score_spread":0.2689590822889802,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W189092474","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.076212645,0.0091643175,0.0025577,0.35453725,0.0012674268,0.00025596193,0.00065401825,0.00007095764,0.55527973],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.79357153,0.0048556537,0.0036030188,0.07683923,0.00035962608,0.0001541211,0.00017622848,0.000073600124,0.12036706],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98536927,0.0014776499,0.00040919785,0.0012070248,0.004721142,0.0068156794],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98466045,0.0032377236,0.00067862746,0.0003712801,0.008563938,0.002487945],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007549698,0.00056027056,0.0006507716,0.0038894208,0.0366992,0.02120342,0.0038608687,0.012849345,0.0110158],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025931342,0.00059230166,0.0007781605,0.003940291,0.01416434,0.00417475,0.00432584,0.014038195,0.00045778218],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003698407,0.000053203457,0.0049248342,0.00008263212,0.00003606348,0.00064191624,0.011641656,0.0011751681,0.00038582378,0.8494239,0.1165992,0.014998705],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009826511,0.0000722823,0.031841036,0.0010787856,0.00018004476,0.00043131263,0.07913313,0.003014494,0.0013300868,0.08292974,0.7993563,0.00053450814],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9954112,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.997612,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18292335,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.18292335,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.34184682,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9476931},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1895924768","doi":"","title":"Canadian Conflict of Laws, 5th Edition","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Conflict of laws; Political science","score_opus":0.030837562297541497,"score_gpt":0.2798800881174427,"score_spread":0.2490425258199012,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1895924768","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0013364006,0.29781973,0.0020526377,0.050180104,0.02057885,0.0003857539,0.041526783,0.00067829393,0.58544135],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.032802608,0.21507928,0.0073495093,0.0075384364,0.0034277774,0.0006857932,0.025761036,0.00041438037,0.7069412],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99734396,0.00021061118,0.00020938274,0.00014173747,0.0017212362,0.00037313835],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9936812,0.0005777886,0.00021081616,0.00018940415,0.004929461,0.00041136512],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025616991,0.0027869986,0.0013349062,0.014823812,0.011201383,0.010952298,0.0044029253,0.006231717,0.06777759],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008427469,0.0019612582,0.0013720049,0.021559628,0.003673268,0.0046448717,0.0018908378,0.0041468227,0.00855338],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004563044,0.000015487998,0.00036112487,0.00014250391,0.0000047811627,0.00002580724,0.00028687977,0.00022701762,0.0000099133285,0.019070202,0.9610608,0.018790882],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004582848,0.0000025801762,0.0018344037,0.00032503862,0.0000074888567,0.000031122112,0.0004821034,0.000106229476,0.000016610382,0.003998808,0.9931733,0.000017690902],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9801499,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99033934,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09322175,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09322175,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.18150444,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6763743},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1914959741","doi":"","title":"Non-State Law in the (Proposed) Hague Principles on Choice of Law in International Contracts","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Choice of law; Conflict of laws; Arbitration; Law; International law; Political science; State (computer science); Private law; Municipal law; Comparative law; Commercial law; Law and economics; Economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.035032304122161274,"score_gpt":0.3051253577801458,"score_spread":0.2700930536579845,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1914959741","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04353884,0.004260059,0.22728702,0.08081893,0.0027198112,0.0006776699,0.0002284691,0.00017745877,0.6402918],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8519845,0.0012751442,0.060298912,0.02013191,0.0009075992,0.0020366258,0.00011513669,0.00013803034,0.06311215],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.952736,0.02347652,0.0038675787,0.0062545734,0.0099379085,0.0037274675],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9786943,0.014116695,0.0012386191,0.0032182443,0.002201093,0.00053107785],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.044941057,0.0007156221,0.001537745,0.0021778666,0.009486152,0.02180691,0.004310224,0.020505458,0.0041594366],"category_scores_gemma":[0.041436207,0.001280926,0.0028036386,0.002139851,0.046196178,0.017094705,0.008248076,0.020400595,0.0011632723],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000017820081,0.000002494686,0.000020043635,0.000004025518,0.0000010990335,0.000005376505,0.0003220504,0.000055537297,0.000009662171,0.99895585,0.00027786664,0.00034420495],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028435403,0.000015106998,0.000093255476,0.00008097364,0.000007159627,0.000028242597,0.00021276782,0.0004634196,0.00012707042,0.9717386,0.0271784,0.000026605248],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010153715,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009847424,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.044941057,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00986061,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017298004,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23767382},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1920220463","doi":"","title":"Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments and Arbitral Awards in Canada","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Enforcement; Business; Law and economics; Law; Political science; Economics","score_opus":0.02295291339054728,"score_gpt":0.23828100028745938,"score_spread":0.2153280868969121,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1920220463","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.40566844,0.005064082,0.004975112,0.06586619,0.0006713013,0.0003217266,0.00074963644,0.0002478438,0.5164357],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95079625,0.0009941956,0.0011607921,0.0048505077,0.000101829595,0.000045247845,0.00011014017,0.000040602943,0.04190051],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9730355,0.001585567,0.0009127454,0.0012576237,0.009843761,0.01336475],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9688793,0.0070569753,0.0024256932,0.00090567727,0.015679609,0.0050526913],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0102000525,0.00040021277,0.0011642022,0.0041230344,0.028929848,0.012896854,0.0033699258,0.0056705964,0.0068968455],"category_scores_gemma":[0.040209334,0.0011687847,0.0008592792,0.0039048158,0.0082991775,0.0019134762,0.004985164,0.009392205,0.0004573811],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002265471,0.00018688684,0.06941603,0.00017711241,0.00019189504,0.0017521862,0.01683401,0.0056011057,0.0012507486,0.7251676,0.108706705,0.070489235],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029627187,0.00014465048,0.2818975,0.0007705571,0.00038993964,0.0007715693,0.02900396,0.017609764,0.0049493564,0.060721267,0.602601,0.00084420847],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99582255,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9981186,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16469242,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.16469242,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.284765,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9688384},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1921771691","doi":"","title":"Recent Private International Law Developments Before the Supreme Court of Canada","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Political science; Conflict of laws; Jurisdiction; Appeal; Charter; Enforcement; Original jurisdiction; Context (archaeology); Statutory law; Doctrine; Choice of law; History","score_opus":0.009249835389792817,"score_gpt":0.260097049987172,"score_spread":0.2508472145973792,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1921771691","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02174408,0.01255944,0.0019786784,0.22528298,0.0040364573,0.00008797217,0.00061415497,0.0002016105,0.7334946],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.44777563,0.012138822,0.0036424005,0.26770872,0.004587588,0.00017934284,0.00089741923,0.00030415246,0.26276588],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9835397,0.0011002222,0.00039317313,0.0021280833,0.0073660407,0.0054728203],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98644394,0.0041417414,0.00065650465,0.000923068,0.0052204398,0.0026142448],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007503866,0.0005221773,0.0007418826,0.002660734,0.026876552,0.027419807,0.0042450507,0.018596334,0.0151361],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023629414,0.0011132116,0.000986784,0.004100597,0.01432877,0.005562901,0.00492071,0.022288285,0.0012114231],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016020496,0.00003557348,0.00051023206,0.00003790188,0.0000129705295,0.0003088366,0.0019952965,0.0002822901,0.00015495432,0.84576714,0.13749728,0.0133815],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003210329,0.000014142479,0.0023732446,0.00031700588,0.000034850746,0.00009875448,0.0021072708,0.00060349127,0.000323033,0.048497748,0.945496,0.00010235442],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.94132847,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9667956,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8918688,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.108131185,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1596324,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7845503},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1928814171","doi":"","title":"Oxford LibGuides: Canadian law: Canadian law","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"libguides","venue":"","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.038787975351773585,"score_gpt":0.2811137213560216,"score_spread":0.242325746004248,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1928814171","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0030512863,0.053508565,0.0004361547,0.032490764,0.0032110459,0.00011218221,0.006771873,0.000229213,0.90018886],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.020658158,0.015565283,0.0008157091,0.0046716365,0.00038123675,0.00009398344,0.0009324268,0.00013490873,0.95674664],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981883,0.00014058503,0.000104237355,0.00017417112,0.0008907697,0.00050193846],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975453,0.0002424845,0.00007016017,0.00008991568,0.0017780528,0.0002741051],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013399981,0.0014091443,0.00084021135,0.0048883506,0.019044569,0.012248899,0.002080918,0.007985713,0.13505319],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004296033,0.0011807217,0.00069158734,0.011409117,0.0043931333,0.004209827,0.0024811612,0.0072113103,0.009706881],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013272264,0.000015905922,0.00041188087,0.00016815639,0.0000047351887,0.000105952095,0.001193335,0.00013034146,0.000036824782,0.14658277,0.833643,0.017693734],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000041125227,0.0000019024883,0.0013279165,0.00023789021,0.000006683449,0.00002501402,0.0009454509,0.000043215037,0.000037935995,0.0032930304,0.9940574,0.00001946187],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99035853,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99689144,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13505319,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10273582,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.21183918,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.745404},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1940146181","doi":"10.3968/4276","title":"Consideration of \"Creation\" in Legal Finding: From the Formulation of Limitations of Law and the Judge's Own Initiative","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Studies in sociology of science","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Law; Discretion; Jurisdiction; Statute; Philosophy of law; Teleology; Political science; Sociology; Comparative law","score_opus":0.1620521966182047,"score_gpt":0.40171377453890134,"score_spread":0.23966157792069664,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1940146181","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04898152,0.014229022,0.17331335,0.18031563,0.0019494371,0.00026065297,0.00008417862,0.00019621696,0.58067],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9653136,0.0017527827,0.013856366,0.0066799913,0.00080419466,0.00018643173,0.000029616906,0.00011469964,0.011262305],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9525676,0.028099963,0.002259318,0.0046740286,0.010041701,0.0023574706],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94756734,0.034702357,0.003230372,0.0073441355,0.005016908,0.002138778],"candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.041585602,0.00055896724,0.0014168209,0.0030277327,0.012106394,0.02642947,0.004658726,0.011206766,0.003158758],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05212562,0.0009056631,0.0011652885,0.002163105,0.16940749,0.037049133,0.016982196,0.01487025,0.00062106183],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000029195076,0.0000050123654,0.00011506275,0.000020329626,0.000002704484,0.00005597836,0.005514588,0.00004957072,0.000050046492,0.9915456,0.00052500993,0.0021132152],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012974344,0.000020630103,0.0002108491,0.00021349348,0.00001030492,0.0002635571,0.0052790176,0.00029606224,0.00020413268,0.9455485,0.047911845,0.000028685909],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004191134,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003681866,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9878936,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009745069,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018088335,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21992832},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1943307676","doi":"","title":"Conflict of laws in international tort cases: The need for reform on both sides of the Tasman","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Yearbook of New Zealand jurisprudence","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tort; Jurisdiction; Law; Test (biology); Flexibility (engineering); Jurisprudence; Political science; Choice of law; Common law; High Court; Conflict of laws; Law and economics; Sociology; Economics; Liability; Management","score_opus":0.03126889659248875,"score_gpt":0.32029698873439144,"score_spread":0.28902809214190267,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1943307676","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07063235,0.048807565,0.0116162775,0.47006178,0.0026921402,0.00010985471,0.000038440612,0.00008529798,0.39595637],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9207864,0.01473988,0.006026553,0.03989981,0.0012797982,0.00011244876,0.000037737274,0.00003903527,0.017078416],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98416185,0.00804117,0.0009643529,0.0009819275,0.002681754,0.003168929],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9828604,0.009889024,0.0014012697,0.0012279984,0.003010854,0.0016104755],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021784484,0.00034916023,0.0007494693,0.0024324222,0.008043998,0.018802395,0.0023331328,0.008158,0.0031769865],"category_scores_gemma":[0.046908703,0.0005606015,0.0007693509,0.0026559304,0.036340594,0.011665589,0.006557446,0.013712095,0.00023323347],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008676377,0.000014789152,0.0009692417,0.00006357294,0.00000919643,0.00038538515,0.01138466,0.00042446516,0.000078840545,0.9526535,0.009202533,0.024805093],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004373222,0.00008822532,0.015182419,0.0031245577,0.00013958974,0.00144778,0.0538179,0.0035693573,0.0004750353,0.5832418,0.338738,0.00013158555],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.24610004,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2945865,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24610004,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.032569006,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.040905107,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.48933518},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1949110849","doi":"","title":"No Place Like Home: The Search for a Legal Framework for the Family Home in Canada and Britain","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Possession (linguistics); Autonomy; Law; Personhood; Property law; Political science; Law reform; Common law; Family law; Property rights; Sociology; Law and economics","score_opus":0.01483141649382996,"score_gpt":0.2700237786127038,"score_spread":0.25519236211887386,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1949110849","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.37943086,0.035040006,0.0035434908,0.1994079,0.0013243483,0.0002379111,0.0005253881,0.00011685332,0.3803733],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92531943,0.0058154454,0.0020395773,0.012342657,0.00007106479,0.000051926203,0.00010859621,0.0000467881,0.054204438],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99516946,0.0005500731,0.00014059547,0.00037963587,0.0014901289,0.0022701134],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9943508,0.0012731256,0.0002512222,0.00013988104,0.0019118743,0.0020731254],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002403692,0.0002613597,0.0004351649,0.002089829,0.030027186,0.012388877,0.0030102902,0.0051131346,0.0053941705],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007588987,0.0004900811,0.00039457314,0.0034257732,0.014326812,0.0022109982,0.003674612,0.0054016816,0.00024352872],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000054376134,0.000048575388,0.010047194,0.0001515225,0.000013061464,0.0017729556,0.044364575,0.0008455664,0.00048705857,0.86390615,0.040530756,0.03777817],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006881278,0.000042532778,0.058170803,0.0014136354,0.00007346426,0.0006046459,0.138024,0.0023064632,0.00054938823,0.031255502,0.76722157,0.0002692218],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99826556,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9990121,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24648245,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.24648245,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.25081787,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.87397355},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W195455339","doi":"","title":"Memorandum on Jurisdictional Issues","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Summit (Simon Fraser University)","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Memorandum; Political science; Computer science; Law","score_opus":0.02673619303779429,"score_gpt":0.25694770571366415,"score_spread":0.23021151267586987,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W195455339","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.003950381,0.0032007229,0.0010965472,0.45435345,0.39819095,0.00094829215,0.00236081,0.0008176025,0.13508128],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.018852223,0.0016056136,0.0013783632,0.20525706,0.07696021,0.0020531276,0.0010396888,0.0005407109,0.6923131],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9896427,0.0011280121,0.0013599677,0.0013553972,0.0031750528,0.0033388939],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98213965,0.007174061,0.000929079,0.0015174776,0.006189015,0.002050785],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013217217,0.002527643,0.0047237263,0.00388697,0.026172118,0.016271293,0.008421064,0.05345101,0.06542368],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05353237,0.0024852315,0.0038828733,0.0019228652,0.0059365793,0.0063015483,0.0094897775,0.05249852,0.030588636],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004237082,0.000026631786,0.00005519218,0.000043501925,0.000011247146,0.00034875865,0.00034416304,0.000031933858,0.00019253512,0.006660312,0.98981476,0.0024284828],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001053796,0.000037883434,0.0010158593,0.00041239607,0.000048260743,0.000107757885,0.00069142325,0.0002032076,0.00043425598,0.004192669,0.99267733,0.00007343237],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05477024,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.072602846,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06542368,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013007543,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0257001,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21886402},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1963493330","doi":"10.7202/042701ar","title":"Méthodologie conflictuelle et protection de l'incapable étranger","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Conflict of laws; Law; Private law; Political science; Law and economics; Public law; Sociology","score_opus":0.04107326155505436,"score_gpt":0.313102060231552,"score_spread":0.27202879867649765,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1963493330","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018369483,0.003993622,0.82259667,0.002466673,0.0005995516,0.0008144817,0.0008992688,0.00047720713,0.14978309],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2572538,0.0032308504,0.6892324,0.00058466475,0.0002802642,0.0021665744,0.0009467315,0.00035247506,0.045952193],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98054117,0.013228489,0.0007675296,0.0017894962,0.0029380033,0.0007353584],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97554713,0.018239541,0.0008588765,0.0027845702,0.0023009134,0.00026904137],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015393523,0.0015652492,0.0011906355,0.0052840724,0.0025032822,0.009755423,0.0024408242,0.002006925,0.019182393],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030642992,0.0007203172,0.0021026165,0.00395527,0.008891927,0.0059460104,0.0039943927,0.005068323,0.0029690969],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000098032855,0.00007874233,0.0017513303,0.00046130715,0.000059459362,0.00028467074,0.00892208,0.00086503464,0.0012194844,0.8808436,0.0029959374,0.102420285],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011092589,0.000110300025,0.0037021607,0.00093045464,0.00009601245,0.001592553,0.010918833,0.007975449,0.006463781,0.6309925,0.33696523,0.00014188314],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008995115,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010138635,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019182393,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038952741,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034173345,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08140969},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1965852444","doi":"10.1111/j.1744-1617.2007.00139.x","title":"ROCK‐PAPER‐SCISSORS: PLAYING THE ODDS WITH THE LAW OF CHILD RELOCATION","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":18,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Relocation; Settlement (finance); Jurisdiction; Law; Adversarial system; Odds; Duty; Process (computing); Proposition; Political science; Sociology; Psychology; Business; Computer science","score_opus":0.021213584404343063,"score_gpt":0.3040934368450104,"score_spread":0.2828798524406673,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1965852444","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1172285,0.027456809,0.033214822,0.22458462,0.0015808975,0.00016370999,0.0000688019,0.00014537107,0.59555644],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92029977,0.0068541206,0.0066888668,0.022335228,0.0005661127,0.00009739713,0.000026467847,0.00008529402,0.043046705],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98460084,0.007231555,0.0006281326,0.0012259263,0.004559284,0.0017542229],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9888426,0.008102571,0.0009362605,0.000691147,0.0009984955,0.0004288625],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012988304,0.0002682907,0.00046412167,0.0012588265,0.0077588176,0.010000324,0.0021237826,0.007816004,0.0060385885],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031623285,0.00044539946,0.0007312476,0.00095309486,0.026523527,0.008073905,0.004651437,0.008478173,0.00080271205],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014824107,0.000010014893,0.001409539,0.000057096866,0.0000072977978,0.00082596566,0.0035653873,0.0003698203,0.00011353433,0.9714192,0.0090766065,0.013130696],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004710635,0.00015012943,0.004087064,0.001181656,0.00005793738,0.0018816709,0.019881755,0.0014677818,0.0012748777,0.4636496,0.5062332,0.00008725595],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03783778,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0779049,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03783778,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0059635616,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010409915,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07523507},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1966565519","doi":"10.1093/jiplp/jps062","title":"Infringement for copying publicly filed court documents: class action certified in Ontario","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; Multiple Sclerosis Society of Canada; University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Copying; Class action; Law; Corporation; Certification; Economic Justice; Class (philosophy); Copyright infringement; Political science; Action (physics); Service (business); Business; Computer science; Intellectual property","score_opus":0.12448166996967591,"score_gpt":0.37367744676494447,"score_spread":0.24919577679526855,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1966565519","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6636771,0.0011352507,0.0011864094,0.037128594,0.00048226395,0.0010164023,0.0008719549,0.00013692307,0.294365],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8297586,0.00076547475,0.0010246516,0.004688509,0.000118738,0.00017947702,0.00032896028,0.000054936234,0.1630806],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98965585,0.00054545177,0.00046398453,0.0006921925,0.0043804524,0.0042620474],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9754885,0.0044021993,0.002577798,0.0013960424,0.0088190995,0.007316358],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006480654,0.00032508728,0.0003475434,0.0018261011,0.021548826,0.0053104446,0.0026462828,0.004755261,0.014913514],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022528438,0.0009190702,0.0005268086,0.0016701141,0.0043730424,0.0016238332,0.0037387467,0.0045372965,0.0010096937],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009896415,0.0013133021,0.24115568,0.0005488615,0.00013791569,0.010571287,0.12446515,0.0009463267,0.011893828,0.09478701,0.28670937,0.22648166],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004013294,0.00037763678,0.4314801,0.0004762429,0.00019279431,0.0011920307,0.036861245,0.002368171,0.006031794,0.0029604568,0.5173756,0.0002825813],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98249567,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9949936,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.099833004,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.099833004,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.20095055,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7243425},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1977315401","doi":"10.1111/j.174-1617.2004.tb00663.x","title":"IS THE TURN TOWARD COLLABORATIVE LAW A TURN AWAY FROM JUSTICE?","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Law and economics; Law; Individualism; Private law; Power (physics); Sociology; Public law; Political science","score_opus":0.04771668560999327,"score_gpt":0.3491699588710791,"score_spread":0.30145327326108584,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1977315401","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0069228793,0.036483794,0.013646754,0.8395524,0.0023532154,0.00003786476,0.000037867394,0.00006943591,0.100895695],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6669054,0.038764775,0.019035466,0.24242604,0.0070080967,0.00024452145,0.0000712332,0.00015905488,0.025385408],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9584314,0.019514274,0.0011523875,0.0042605377,0.011990449,0.0046509337],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9453626,0.030657874,0.003566434,0.004034916,0.009990751,0.0063874833],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03324645,0.00033999328,0.0009233702,0.0020228857,0.011689,0.016735127,0.0033624186,0.012652803,0.006099117],"category_scores_gemma":[0.063153125,0.00035016827,0.0009246899,0.0023173753,0.037490454,0.017832179,0.007474936,0.01271511,0.0010652518],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006219857,0.000017146376,0.0002673954,0.0001072935,0.000008366564,0.000060487426,0.0025699644,0.000104882645,0.000040130562,0.9522329,0.026774097,0.017811207],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002913379,0.000043530436,0.0009862157,0.0006278422,0.000017486884,0.00017490346,0.005095668,0.00029986328,0.00015823422,0.62151915,0.37102216,0.000025726838],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09311849,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.095056124,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09311849,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.023133963,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.048905797,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18515295},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1977653990","doi":"10.7202/042927ar","title":"Le statut des obligations en droit international privé","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.009769131220409608,"score_gpt":0.26400302294101474,"score_spread":0.2542338917206051,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1977653990","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13832138,0.0016607449,0.011322851,0.0085004,0.00014239535,0.00007131065,0.0029803559,0.000114371964,0.83688617],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.863489,0.0011002901,0.0036304034,0.0009670479,0.000062845014,0.0000948603,0.001123201,0.00005316016,0.12947918],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967173,0.0005854273,0.000121172285,0.0002944693,0.0015677577,0.00071376894],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961706,0.0010516746,0.00041353403,0.00036220058,0.0016769832,0.00032499916],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002658125,0.00027013975,0.0002495647,0.0024754475,0.0028277794,0.0044110054,0.0006849154,0.0010577716,0.011984947],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0065927943,0.00027615,0.00027592946,0.002694947,0.0039547235,0.0019271582,0.0013279996,0.0021199894,0.00079704926],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013894469,0.0000068264067,0.004033769,0.000021116197,0.000007927845,0.000041318362,0.0016402551,0.00066935876,0.00016539691,0.98015565,0.0060088625,0.0072356164],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000044198776,0.0000838647,0.10636121,0.0005628952,0.000059960435,0.00032511706,0.0062000635,0.0057334276,0.0015890738,0.26017636,0.6187336,0.00013022099],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5783701,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6080375,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5783701,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017119398,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01844699,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.84822595},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1986722370","doi":"10.1017/s0020589314000621","title":"CHOICE-OF-COURT AGREEMENTS, THE ITALIAN TORPEDO, AND THE RECAST OF THE BRUSSELS I REGULATION","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International and Comparative Law Quarterly","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trinity College","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Law; Prima facie; Supreme court; Political science","score_opus":0.08029000003947137,"score_gpt":0.3381065878157076,"score_spread":0.2578165877762363,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1986722370","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07848526,0.0016123398,0.007227236,0.061832745,0.0007608789,0.00009739927,0.00009127644,0.00006609335,0.8498267],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9523607,0.00035676057,0.0014919277,0.008995284,0.00027495535,0.00009879023,0.000033664746,0.00003451281,0.036353365],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97161204,0.012296078,0.001085961,0.0031104258,0.006057787,0.0058377357],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98202366,0.01001621,0.0019322,0.002112896,0.0028157777,0.001099292],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015517424,0.00035025738,0.00062189286,0.0020372393,0.01030491,0.017686225,0.0030671412,0.011264666,0.004564601],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028950734,0.0005022996,0.0007597919,0.0022160395,0.035944026,0.005957052,0.0082471045,0.016039424,0.0006091067],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008397723,0.0000060078532,0.00030428232,0.000008613808,0.000002197448,0.0001392677,0.003401192,0.00014671186,0.000024892835,0.99124545,0.0033069,0.0014060497],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008804413,0.00008820599,0.004405075,0.0008828556,0.000058548765,0.0005802711,0.02218061,0.0025198222,0.00080729794,0.48981425,0.4783282,0.00024675354],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.097844906,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.111590646,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.097844906,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.021691266,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015313579,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19455075},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1988282677","doi":"10.1002/crq.3890180404","title":"Money and mediation: Patterns of conflict in family mediation of financial matters","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Mediation Quarterly","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"College of Family Physicians of Canada; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Mediation; Negotiation; Conflict resolution; Psychology; Social psychology; Political science; Business; Law and economics; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.014540606464888065,"score_gpt":0.27174428040402865,"score_spread":0.25720367393914056,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1988282677","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9929281,0.00048868265,0.00057138427,0.00071848615,0.0000044410945,0.000017210785,0.000043048036,0.000003881331,0.0052246638],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996799,0.000071745126,0.00009394956,0.000013730797,0.0000015450552,0.000009358555,0.000012548524,8.464508e-7,0.00011636946],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99497414,0.0037679928,0.0002030343,0.00019071052,0.00035451134,0.0005095478],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9751222,0.017836971,0.004133536,0.0008955808,0.00097549177,0.0010361422],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004403607,0.00014828586,0.0002921634,0.001814418,0.0028692426,0.0034951612,0.0009842901,0.0007681553,0.0051590973],"category_scores_gemma":[0.036652185,0.00022192427,0.00020103484,0.0020218848,0.00391458,0.002974344,0.0029950438,0.0011904343,0.00022812396],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00047137355,0.00029594213,0.73569894,0.00015520194,0.00011715928,0.0010326342,0.2047609,0.0006036261,0.00055293826,0.018853374,0.0009994531,0.03645847],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000034070625,0.00016924841,0.5960259,0.00021535589,0.000055516197,0.002007711,0.37385097,0.001860358,0.00043191758,0.020445034,0.004845295,0.000058626614],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006288424,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0058399606,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006288424,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012547008,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009957037,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.023288786},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1988350243","doi":"10.1177/08969205000260010901","title":"Book Review: Blomley, Nicholas K. Law, Space, and the Geographies of Power (1994/1998). New York: Guilford Press","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Critical Sociology","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Power (physics); Sociology; Law and economics; Space (punctuation); Economic geography; Media studies; Philosophy; Economics; Physics; Thermodynamics; Linguistics","score_opus":0.02061286424465531,"score_gpt":0.3185644563102595,"score_spread":0.2979515920656042,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1988350243","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00009736375,0.9579306,0.00039936005,0.0129285045,0.010401217,0.000033160104,0.0005333957,0.00008354612,0.017592862],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0016263273,0.90243936,0.0007292671,0.0077373525,0.006611592,0.00007271385,0.0007910108,0.000081453276,0.079910904],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994604,0.000069307214,0.00004979088,0.00008944795,0.00028428397,0.00004673871],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973665,0.0011058939,0.00020150945,0.00006345936,0.0010503976,0.00021217352],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009471325,0.0022857839,0.0029181452,0.007100159,0.0009906249,0.003025711,0.002865286,0.0028267899,0.068488866],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004115634,0.0010058067,0.0007471727,0.012299512,0.0013833632,0.0044134706,0.001594111,0.0044016317,0.054297566],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001385092,0.0000076162382,0.000047101144,0.0008791403,0.000009628525,0.00002814628,0.00005014713,0.000046031244,0.000033043383,0.0009929762,0.94813883,0.049753424],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011007047,0.0000061510905,0.0002507604,0.0012693489,0.000016659153,0.00022467582,0.000055550634,0.000019606117,0.00003091985,0.00092782424,0.99717855,0.000009041087],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021085802,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.041922987,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.068488866,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002904819,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0040695444,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22911811},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1990109432","doi":"","title":"The Canadian Codification of Forum Non Conveniens","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Section (typography); Common law; Statutory law; Jurisdiction; Law; Supreme court; Jurisprudence; Nova scotia; Statute; Political science; Doctrine; Choice of law; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.020152470256363332,"score_gpt":0.26346658868257483,"score_spread":0.2433141184262115,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1990109432","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.035386004,0.004342454,0.052475296,0.023679245,0.002198682,0.0010571019,0.0056685233,0.0007816339,0.8744111],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5538715,0.005295259,0.13617237,0.009033514,0.00044458514,0.0008783327,0.0066026375,0.0005395187,0.2871624],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9800181,0.0015819779,0.0017262765,0.0018335145,0.0124435695,0.00239651],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97210306,0.0042954786,0.00083122,0.0033762574,0.018729864,0.0006641268],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012858994,0.0008540412,0.00087318796,0.009341904,0.015355446,0.013154575,0.003941316,0.0038736225,0.0086669065],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03337049,0.0008166369,0.0012072398,0.009218102,0.008624757,0.005116712,0.004393671,0.0057684914,0.001678407],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014866155,0.000010083897,0.00070444564,0.00010844903,0.000008639292,0.00023657217,0.0054303934,0.0003388672,0.00051331276,0.93360716,0.03108768,0.027939402],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000036043624,0.000022818704,0.0051850774,0.0009262818,0.00006889088,0.00036103296,0.005676729,0.0027646704,0.0033212309,0.1315685,0.8498578,0.00021089998],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9335172,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.95552635,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08569814,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08569814,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.19656223,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6217865},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1990832992","doi":"10.1163/15718190119684829","title":"J. Harries, Law and Empire in Late Antiquity","year":2001,"lang":"nl","type":"article","venue":"Tijdschrift voor Rechtsgeschiedenis / Revue d Histoire du Droit / The Legal History Review","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Inversa Systems (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Empire; Ancient history; Philosophy; Art; Law; History; Political science","score_opus":0.027285101639700257,"score_gpt":0.2604430926201265,"score_spread":0.23315799098042622,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1990832992","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.023274057,0.42902815,0.0008607855,0.32215667,0.004754643,0.000022781207,0.00023029892,0.000024503679,0.21964815],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6858838,0.16792417,0.0009913099,0.029484322,0.005690928,0.000057713092,0.00014527014,0.000051751842,0.1097707],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99908054,0.0005748236,0.000039291048,0.00006665918,0.00013193999,0.00010665015],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964663,0.0024777134,0.00018085894,0.0001332463,0.0005906077,0.00015116535],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021745388,0.00018705096,0.00032806717,0.0018203425,0.0045698755,0.0054720114,0.0004211196,0.0024487937,0.0072300388],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0063830893,0.00017282713,0.00015442153,0.0018442887,0.006953736,0.0044567585,0.0013801575,0.00241201,0.00049587403],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003618001,0.00002101877,0.0011706755,0.00031341435,0.000008880424,0.0002123189,0.013841493,0.00023039528,0.00011056331,0.84516525,0.11479539,0.024094494],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001178876,0.000015264026,0.004270708,0.0014081851,0.0000072632465,0.00016297676,0.012938523,0.00011512396,0.00020487398,0.22960095,0.751246,0.00001841713],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.034720123,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07051006,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.034720123,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037623509,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003847539,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06903607},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1991407196","doi":"10.3406/ridc.2008.19628","title":"La cession de créances en droit international privé québécois","year":2008,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue internationale de droit comparé","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.024036278501408385,"score_gpt":0.29449140862774564,"score_spread":0.27045513012633726,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1991407196","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21859594,0.0020554322,0.008376987,0.008271361,0.00021220543,0.00012819104,0.0004918186,0.0001552996,0.7617128],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5678838,0.0009494771,0.0022016668,0.0013859663,0.00003749532,0.00004406457,0.00020494324,0.00008371345,0.42720887],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99827635,0.00019414125,0.00003876235,0.00025369445,0.0006676022,0.0005694538],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99861646,0.00025598705,0.00014923421,0.00017333873,0.00059994165,0.00020499814],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010640961,0.00039197973,0.00018350441,0.001035799,0.0062613874,0.005503485,0.0007869116,0.0015625673,0.021764673],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024044663,0.00029407712,0.00037114264,0.0014259014,0.004350465,0.0020407496,0.001983585,0.0024257286,0.00093394803],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011716884,0.00005186905,0.02128561,0.00018425759,0.000054665896,0.0014183273,0.029917218,0.0020129045,0.0049823215,0.8268756,0.042565934,0.07053407],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002100822,0.00006188643,0.03927398,0.00025968088,0.000043053566,0.00041634636,0.013209164,0.0013367041,0.0031789185,0.011518321,0.93058443,0.00009653299],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.85917,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.92091244,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14082998,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.023963718,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02788182,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2833187},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1995152663","doi":"","title":"The Movement of U.S. Criminal and Administrative Law: Processes of Transplanting and Translating","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University)","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Legal pluralism; Legal culture; Political science; Legal realism; Comparative law; Legal research; Sociology","score_opus":0.03121101605329381,"score_gpt":0.26539013034974923,"score_spread":0.2341791142964554,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1995152663","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2665602,0.008586363,0.053103507,0.0526765,0.0009427928,0.00023585043,0.00005435714,0.0004841571,0.6173563],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.952995,0.0024444826,0.014468091,0.0033572256,0.00013659081,0.00010996628,0.000049226837,0.00022213437,0.026217302],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9868658,0.008624243,0.0004520592,0.00078791555,0.0022411316,0.0010287928],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98913693,0.0064540952,0.0010769421,0.0018916726,0.00087010796,0.00057028903],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01608433,0.0003944596,0.00035998298,0.0025234951,0.014669608,0.017009905,0.0012038879,0.0033372194,0.0044270875],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024663823,0.00042969215,0.0005405739,0.0046206145,0.033895634,0.012461589,0.011915252,0.0055149305,0.0009528115],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001665079,0.000036007405,0.0016385745,0.000040690255,0.0000051663565,0.0003393889,0.13237092,0.00027449752,0.00054926606,0.77341175,0.0045382287,0.08677875],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012843096,0.00015432121,0.004260545,0.00052430574,0.00002383794,0.0008936952,0.20614704,0.0012432046,0.0020763008,0.29052913,0.4940675,0.00006731021],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009102126,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010903001,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017009905,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007816233,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012248779,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0850631},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1996654317","doi":"10.1108/03090550210770489","title":"The internal grievance process and grievance arbitration in Quebec: an illustration of the North‐American methods of resolving disputes arising from the application of collective agreements","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Law and Management","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Grievance; Arbitration; Jurisdiction; Dispute resolution; Process (computing); Field (mathematics); Law; Dispute mechanism; Political science; Law and economics; Online dispute resolution; Business; Alternative dispute resolution; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.01932219873718558,"score_gpt":0.34113065041913115,"score_spread":0.32180845168194555,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1996654317","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24304464,0.0056945714,0.038304336,0.03157953,0.00041965555,0.0003862702,0.00030255524,0.00020656773,0.680062],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90353453,0.0010375598,0.0070945946,0.00095973245,0.000026846015,0.00006783274,0.00007077477,0.000026824928,0.08718126],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985903,0.0005761036,0.000021700573,0.00008660624,0.0002769759,0.0004482837],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99870646,0.0005318934,0.00011102976,0.00010685064,0.00040399146,0.00013978119],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017417836,0.0002649389,0.00014984384,0.0007702051,0.01076237,0.004412438,0.0013356718,0.0015964691,0.0074934005],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025013278,0.00014748421,0.00026198992,0.0012264666,0.0060965647,0.0008405605,0.0014069497,0.0014542802,0.00033675964],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000053201424,0.00007610352,0.008775313,0.00012095736,0.000020592235,0.0019581362,0.031348966,0.0053915707,0.0010050978,0.80756,0.03603718,0.10765278],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008661136,0.00009759314,0.059391912,0.00065503974,0.00006662164,0.0012999147,0.03656124,0.030722464,0.0020910816,0.04904806,0.81981677,0.00016272963],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9852503,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9932232,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95710313,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04289688,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.034548588,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31124014},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1997108446","doi":"10.7202/1027329ar","title":"Forum of necessity in Quebec Private International Law: C.c.Q. art. 3136","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"University of Ottawa; U.S. Department of Justice","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Law; Context (archaeology); Jurisprudence; Doctrine; Subject-matter jurisdiction; Political science; Appeal; Relation (database); Discretion; Common law; Subject (documents); Legislature; Law and economics; Sociology; Original jurisdiction; Computer science","score_opus":0.009973752715564773,"score_gpt":0.2611702568633445,"score_spread":0.2511965041477797,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1997108446","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021435445,0.015536183,0.006446112,0.047924463,0.0022449396,0.0003576049,0.0020590355,0.00025346864,0.90374285],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.29627758,0.005183117,0.008514363,0.03818961,0.0007983605,0.00047107134,0.000823499,0.00013509684,0.64960724],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970522,0.00034418327,0.00011664192,0.00040063975,0.0014089056,0.0006774559],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99837625,0.0005108768,0.00014599253,0.00012771164,0.00072302815,0.00011614281],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027158868,0.00073693116,0.00039906014,0.0014995856,0.009688619,0.0077717174,0.0013193488,0.009015924,0.012266901],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0044682147,0.00066440896,0.00072173745,0.0022581576,0.008212462,0.0019963107,0.001605226,0.0063609146,0.0018540573],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016163769,0.000016808672,0.000491773,0.000049462407,0.0000038229878,0.00021337406,0.0028039217,0.00030428488,0.00036444172,0.89911723,0.08935589,0.00726278],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028761004,0.000041657877,0.008072696,0.0003369924,0.000018855848,0.00023028572,0.0012461392,0.001007522,0.0005167082,0.03956373,0.9488179,0.00011873598],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.93304956,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.94740176,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06695044,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.041527703,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05403796,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.301306},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W1998171206","doi":"","title":"From Reaction to Agency: A 'Subaltern' Response to William Twining's Globalisation and Legal Scholarship","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Centre for International Governance Innovation","funders":"","keywords":"Legal pluralism; Subaltern; Jurisprudence; Law; Legal realism; Globalization; Political science; Sociology; Scholarship; Empirical legal studies; Agency (philosophy); Comparative law; Social science","score_opus":0.014250340757953261,"score_gpt":0.30465085906985534,"score_spread":0.29040051831190206,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W1998171206","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.039370935,0.02707578,0.019262606,0.71239585,0.0031153355,0.000025222957,0.000021937378,0.00004512648,0.19868724],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8695734,0.012472692,0.0057503767,0.079788804,0.003184154,0.00008155946,0.00002107454,0.00015747844,0.028970394],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9908812,0.0058025923,0.00022276545,0.0011414085,0.0013223116,0.0006297405],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.989394,0.0075094383,0.00047885065,0.0009837669,0.00083620544,0.00079772295],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010086992,0.0004907346,0.0006752702,0.0015365017,0.008582003,0.011896898,0.0014282546,0.006783359,0.0030894408],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014020261,0.00035718223,0.00042826947,0.0021642004,0.075741366,0.020883236,0.013324985,0.015005936,0.00028675946],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000075669923,0.0000050688805,0.00017180564,0.000019751364,0.00000257121,0.000064833854,0.018229201,0.00007841305,0.000035358302,0.9718636,0.0059355274,0.0035861828],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000066595185,0.000010547087,0.00023377332,0.00015140958,0.0000038349294,0.00015751462,0.01589635,0.00023911291,0.00010805368,0.7705977,0.21258052,0.00001450627],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005217764,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0063042473,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011896898,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0063683027,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0046861107,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0533458},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2000066111","doi":"10.1017/s1472669600001444","title":"Flag The New Internet Gateway to Foreign Law Holdings in UK National and University Libraries","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Legal Information Management","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Future Earth","funders":"","keywords":"Gateway (web page); Legislation; The Internet; Political science; Flag (linear algebra); Law library; Library science; International law; Law; Public administration; World Wide Web; Computer science","score_opus":0.017478508039495244,"score_gpt":0.22591805301329315,"score_spread":0.2084395449737979,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2000066111","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.052589104,0.009892682,0.0028846648,0.15257509,0.005957144,0.00018642537,0.0047995467,0.004716805,0.7663985],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.19236463,0.0039906795,0.0029789691,0.029397497,0.0027867379,0.00020660955,0.003859555,0.0014462728,0.762969],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99646735,0.0009888875,0.00035077584,0.0002582813,0.0008622491,0.0010723908],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9772917,0.005887106,0.002871821,0.0026647407,0.0028068128,0.008477817],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042821146,0.00027271357,0.00033010237,0.0061241942,0.007262193,0.018301208,0.0011252032,0.0059321434,0.18339898],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017606046,0.000805373,0.0004215554,0.008097084,0.0039043133,0.01783348,0.008493471,0.0032643215,0.0456933],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012854021,0.00004681722,0.006267012,0.00017131203,0.000005554846,0.00050233153,0.00755158,0.000048259848,0.00050361105,0.03185465,0.8718212,0.08109909],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009872292,0.000014055089,0.007066589,0.00015097507,0.000003549334,0.000162505,0.004819473,0.00005099276,0.00013626719,0.0012181242,0.98634726,0.000020438414],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.032293964,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.075131774,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9816988,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0058180783,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008727866,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6135307},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2000981688","doi":"10.7202/043834ar","title":"La codification internationale du droit international privé : un échec ?","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.011161736375773083,"score_gpt":0.253255779957406,"score_spread":0.24209404358163292,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2000981688","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10819499,0.019714523,0.2109631,0.07389111,0.0018574172,0.00054259895,0.0015632648,0.0007199482,0.5825531],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7418638,0.011010075,0.17183132,0.0051562698,0.0004973339,0.0005395683,0.0016485049,0.00081537367,0.066637695],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98888284,0.0031333317,0.0014302633,0.0014603641,0.00404771,0.0010455456],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.980841,0.005549938,0.0019727428,0.005748326,0.0050844653,0.00080351235],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015711162,0.0007204246,0.0007720984,0.0047878865,0.002766051,0.018417986,0.0020688795,0.0025557813,0.008521989],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029731132,0.00047682237,0.0010865089,0.00819805,0.0068268315,0.021474574,0.0054977704,0.0052207867,0.0010795199],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036418573,0.000027171676,0.005852992,0.00021153825,0.000042687036,0.00011193496,0.0046052784,0.0015754182,0.00046463672,0.8877852,0.0055931355,0.09369355],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027657534,0.00009833082,0.010070511,0.0030636298,0.00007445391,0.00040211974,0.016882658,0.0051761265,0.0037504532,0.3678628,0.5924436,0.00014757756],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04732794,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.026667727,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04732794,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0117079085,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015087913,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.094104886},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2004089465","doi":"10.7202/042387ar","title":"Les réactions de la doctrine à la création du droit par les juges en droit international privé","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Doctrine; Harmony (color); Political science; Modernization theory; Conflict of laws; Phenomenon; Law; Humanities; Welfare economics; Law and economics; Philosophy; Sociology; Economics; Physics; Epistemology","score_opus":0.007098500986316761,"score_gpt":0.27817793460019846,"score_spread":0.2710794336138817,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2004089465","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17130964,0.004644216,0.0032984426,0.11206618,0.0009078393,0.00005736151,0.00009660071,0.000047558668,0.70757216],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.914054,0.0013756091,0.00059198216,0.006813842,0.00024596744,0.000033132375,0.000024147412,0.000034360542,0.076827],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9930189,0.002580879,0.00011549534,0.000492669,0.0025028377,0.0012890649],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99176323,0.0046626204,0.0006362559,0.00031858016,0.0020032437,0.0006160857],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0075898804,0.00035483393,0.00028162834,0.0014818672,0.01331675,0.012093929,0.0011179466,0.005481767,0.0075116614],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013940837,0.00032608834,0.00044025172,0.0014924628,0.034638494,0.0029698322,0.0031159562,0.012169093,0.0007293744],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033256583,0.00001958129,0.0014126246,0.000040595205,0.000008127802,0.00036157705,0.05269832,0.00022757852,0.00049023045,0.9246783,0.013411233,0.006618468],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005191811,0.000045364868,0.012361217,0.00029594748,0.000025713636,0.00034796738,0.0949274,0.0006855201,0.0015838473,0.1108722,0.7787206,0.000082288345],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.50002104,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5421755,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.50002104,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.045222417,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018431038,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9942212},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W200675586","doi":"","title":"Mutual recognition of cultural diversity: legal pluralism in Britain and Canada in the 21st century","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Figshare","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Diversity (politics); Cultural diversity; Pluralism (philosophy); Cultural pluralism; Political science; Sociology; Law; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.029757983503528106,"score_gpt":0.2597785624777074,"score_spread":0.23002057897417932,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W200675586","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.80467296,0.002657646,0.00079670857,0.061222777,0.00016280543,0.000039250932,0.00011171893,0.000017047038,0.13031912],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9934556,0.0001975865,0.00014848476,0.001368525,0.000012031104,0.0000066150155,0.000012041147,0.0000072596945,0.004791863],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98580825,0.0032025448,0.00039057902,0.0010602752,0.003969065,0.005569253],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9782461,0.0069824927,0.0015930091,0.0008980905,0.0052682804,0.0070120855],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00973415,0.00015779938,0.0007451086,0.0023336546,0.03850613,0.016338035,0.0032913445,0.0052214605,0.007112984],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024524115,0.00037499593,0.0003652126,0.0038325544,0.037493743,0.0038999876,0.015351806,0.007459464,0.00017259855],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009616759,0.00007027825,0.036885127,0.00009823684,0.000060703005,0.0013151079,0.44308865,0.0005447431,0.00055329205,0.45823753,0.013178917,0.045871157],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000056490248,0.00005094594,0.10889863,0.0005013484,0.000059192236,0.0005934165,0.5498467,0.00087053067,0.00048144636,0.05913317,0.27933034,0.00017784644],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.959586,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9837224,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.074138835,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.074138835,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14315537,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5379174},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2011758464","doi":"10.7202/042166ar","title":"Quelques commentaires sur le rapport de l 'Office de revision du Code civil sur le droit international privé","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Civil code; Political science; Law; Conflict of laws; Code (set theory); Humanities; Library science; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.016545748258485024,"score_gpt":0.26272795850372177,"score_spread":0.24618221024523673,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2011758464","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0030583104,0.004593625,0.0034318056,0.8579278,0.07344539,0.0001685786,0.0009072395,0.000275788,0.056191392],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.04982935,0.0059773074,0.0033600493,0.6060301,0.03466054,0.00055305177,0.00096351205,0.0011960361,0.29743013],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.96847486,0.0068637263,0.0022985768,0.002853239,0.016276494,0.0032329857],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.91711473,0.034759488,0.006229516,0.0026000158,0.03654632,0.0027499194],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019500399,0.001033175,0.0011191437,0.0017524927,0.011098657,0.012149636,0.0030576407,0.01860543,0.017342813],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09545543,0.00086916325,0.0016519781,0.0034789515,0.0054334383,0.006693159,0.0032132708,0.023749208,0.008136226],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036361427,0.00001812133,0.00036528063,0.00009480945,0.000008685393,0.00018910071,0.0018328498,0.0000742085,0.00036597176,0.02584889,0.967176,0.0039896425],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010086697,0.0000100710395,0.0011149124,0.00017891944,0.000010043542,0.000060865274,0.0012327965,0.00009832544,0.00047113825,0.0019449611,0.994825,0.00004299697],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12482027,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13631706,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12482027,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012194356,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018869387,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24818748},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2012492497","doi":"10.7202/042288ar","title":"La Cour suprême et les communications","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Broadcasting (networking); Jurisdiction; Legislation; Service (business); Law; Parliament; Business; Power (physics); Telecommunications; Political science; Engineering; Computer security; Politics; Computer science; Marketing","score_opus":0.019773996659117686,"score_gpt":0.31330528410558284,"score_spread":0.29353128744646517,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2012492497","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017679106,0.021849575,0.001550743,0.0967188,0.002209264,0.000037804486,0.00027358826,0.00010331146,0.85957783],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.46887228,0.005685399,0.0009770027,0.026387267,0.0022438257,0.00012647346,0.00016260079,0.00009157301,0.49545354],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99374276,0.0011002282,0.0001642472,0.0007218425,0.002596484,0.001674482],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977307,0.0013813233,0.00014387831,0.00011586035,0.00043027312,0.00019789477],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002830677,0.0006206985,0.00064990076,0.0010085279,0.013010684,0.015001657,0.000912409,0.010436489,0.016704045],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010031616,0.00054836005,0.0005929009,0.0016319931,0.007148733,0.0027417827,0.0020921892,0.013831723,0.0024689352],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016399812,0.000007909486,0.00016642852,0.000010344673,0.000004025057,0.00018550585,0.0010729484,0.00007502344,0.00013135029,0.96285826,0.03113714,0.004334628],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000032406606,0.00001570419,0.0008965284,0.00008064878,0.000010567886,0.00010574738,0.00071610213,0.00025734934,0.00034609073,0.04756705,0.9499452,0.000026504196],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.32695675,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.26713642,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.32695675,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.020203713,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015908951,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.65010726},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2012580666","doi":"10.7202/1027080ar","title":"Véronique Fortin, Myriam Jézéquel, Nicholas Kasirer (dir.), Les sept péchés capitaux et le droit privé, Montréal, Éditions Thémis, 2007, 290 pages, ISBN 978-2-89400-240-7 Nadine Watté, Le droit patrimonial des familles en droit international privé : perspectives du récent Code belge, Montréal, Éditions Thémis, 2008, 78 pages, ISBN 978-2-89400-253-7","year":2009,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Art; Political science","score_opus":0.01188745430252379,"score_gpt":0.24681922050558408,"score_spread":0.23493176620306028,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2012580666","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0005443031,0.78608876,0.0005748935,0.14424002,0.023391634,0.00002888275,0.0004949156,0.000069391135,0.0445672],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.01045132,0.70547295,0.0011071598,0.023898056,0.011374441,0.00008209877,0.0005133675,0.0002022298,0.24689832],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99870765,0.00032815072,0.00007370203,0.00019661487,0.0005699281,0.00012394859],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983871,0.00063622795,0.00019154619,0.000028257025,0.00058042305,0.00017653333],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001444826,0.0011487314,0.00085773604,0.001914899,0.0023550896,0.004719099,0.0013051889,0.0031617996,0.057254184],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004020595,0.0006711345,0.00046893652,0.0036976123,0.001365491,0.006139654,0.0017685631,0.0041353265,0.027383193],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010071543,0.0000051234633,0.00020405772,0.0003097265,0.0000042869997,0.00004445566,0.0007576347,0.000024401872,0.000049097165,0.0038710742,0.9643272,0.030392865],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000027178196,0.0000033240249,0.00093679514,0.00033515622,0.0000032447672,0.0001115989,0.000859697,0.000015863283,0.000028331324,0.00073353254,0.9969614,0.000008226404],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.10272728,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2036041,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10272728,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005375033,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0044768853,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20425868},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2014252366","doi":"10.1111/j.1468-2230.2009.00733.x","title":"Cohabitation and Comparative Method","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Law Review","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Canadian Association of Physicists","funders":"","keywords":"Cohabitation; Legislature; Sociology; Family law; Comparative law; Political science; Law; Common law; Gender studies","score_opus":0.15754106484424277,"score_gpt":0.4168717554287403,"score_spread":0.25933069058449754,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2014252366","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1038012,0.03381641,0.23697929,0.0077676754,0.0031577712,0.012149513,0.002755463,0.0002064893,0.59936607],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6076173,0.014520898,0.23680583,0.0074499766,0.0010957641,0.051210802,0.0018166093,0.00029573851,0.079187036],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9716375,0.023209462,0.0006950548,0.002153657,0.0016154452,0.0006888557],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98661196,0.007880609,0.0008254727,0.0020045533,0.0022629185,0.00041444463],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01753388,0.00062271726,0.0010369547,0.006297975,0.005179054,0.0026238132,0.0032288316,0.0014829335,0.036199946],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02997822,0.00037549852,0.00048591764,0.008447364,0.005568657,0.0038267458,0.004958543,0.0017625282,0.0021468122],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00024212651,0.00017195493,0.00461722,0.0015169088,0.00007137533,0.0004201315,0.026435876,0.00021024382,0.0005356929,0.8258078,0.011213282,0.12875724],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018074375,0.00046685676,0.011620217,0.0021981562,0.00016811748,0.0010412121,0.042775072,0.0012178705,0.0015636499,0.31607932,0.62261057,0.00007822253],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005204075,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006043207,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.036199946,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00354607,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002865819,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1211009},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2016150660","doi":"10.1080/03050718.2012.748258","title":"Private international law and the Internet, 2nd edn","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Commonwealth Law Bulletin","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"The Internet; Law; Political science; Conflict of laws; Law and economics; Sociology; Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.01425567974650163,"score_gpt":0.27534418013345546,"score_spread":0.26108850038695386,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2016150660","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.001161923,0.71394414,0.0010714268,0.025010955,0.0041679624,0.00002132375,0.00033459952,0.00014625532,0.25414136],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.048420656,0.4404924,0.0013942363,0.009613035,0.0068260925,0.00012107149,0.0005787517,0.00033141745,0.49222243],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99925035,0.0001915539,0.000049232003,0.000097113596,0.0003047051,0.000107041255],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99936897,0.00025153952,0.000109550456,0.0000837409,0.000109580644,0.000076600874],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008509,0.0009787752,0.0005769031,0.0024509216,0.0021667855,0.010470564,0.00083364727,0.0031680218,0.0390545],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002742993,0.0008313163,0.0004127739,0.0036986824,0.0039650034,0.010311808,0.00229986,0.0027536782,0.012310524],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002208019,0.00003419527,0.0002596565,0.0003768503,0.000009304536,0.00011347652,0.0015906419,0.00018948133,0.00013371414,0.15211897,0.7270898,0.11806182],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000043990617,0.000005326344,0.00054078386,0.000837703,0.0000034775624,0.00012892642,0.00075978506,0.0000777492,0.000039434235,0.027101688,0.9704936,0.0000071633126],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010865198,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.026556604,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0390545,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004171934,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030511909,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13065034},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2021063160","doi":"10.7202/042413ar","title":"L'autorisation d'exercer le recours collectif","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Students Commission","funders":"","keywords":"Paragraph; Constitution; Plaintiff; Class (philosophy); Law; Political science; Character (mathematics); Unitary state; Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy; Mathematics","score_opus":0.010472280983543027,"score_gpt":0.2598584058930552,"score_spread":0.24938612490951217,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2021063160","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017579429,0.004223411,0.019524414,0.013307093,0.0021815253,0.0002740841,0.0007513819,0.00060783984,0.94155085],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.17858621,0.0029520683,0.009018092,0.0049364204,0.0012586334,0.00038025223,0.00041090962,0.0003959796,0.80206144],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98831135,0.0024201137,0.00024425038,0.0012149168,0.005904569,0.0019047336],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9950163,0.0013404908,0.00031103048,0.0011000262,0.001812823,0.00041937828],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0069277417,0.0009216088,0.0008141858,0.0017875265,0.009295343,0.0084183095,0.0022616165,0.0030988513,0.03818174],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007525909,0.00053181825,0.0012418855,0.0016470522,0.006715412,0.00290188,0.0033025932,0.0050130733,0.00806372],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007258853,0.000047718946,0.0019530783,0.0001794734,0.000028707607,0.0003399362,0.0050545204,0.00043557023,0.001068385,0.8321778,0.09208939,0.06655278],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015306956,0.000023351275,0.0031099305,0.00011215573,0.0000077524255,0.00016588936,0.0008301777,0.0002595435,0.0005171212,0.0076020095,0.98732555,0.000031155425],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4469663,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.546178,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5530337,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016293028,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.026598774,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.88872933},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2021718236","doi":"10.1111/j.1559-3584.2000.tb03358.x","title":"The Frank G. Law Award","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Naval Engineers Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Lockheed Martin (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Service (business); Set (abstract data type); Engineering; Political science; Management; Law and economics; Sociology; Computer science; Business; Economics; Programming language","score_opus":0.00826888216165331,"score_gpt":0.26846854592630875,"score_spread":0.2601996637646554,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2021718236","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0015399593,0.003967207,0.0015158793,0.24542959,0.13007547,0.00014499307,0.0004840986,0.00036581288,0.61647695],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.003988889,0.0006953993,0.0002695601,0.010171934,0.0042029014,0.000036882415,0.000099173565,0.00006157193,0.9804735],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963104,0.00030477933,0.00012421081,0.00039725614,0.0018449882,0.0010182814],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9931297,0.0005278602,0.00015056567,0.00037807037,0.0016409572,0.0041728336],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038837958,0.00097032584,0.0010070509,0.0022674934,0.0058554267,0.007551071,0.0012163317,0.009123116,0.15810223],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011681432,0.00051880913,0.0008783345,0.0006332527,0.0020309195,0.0027671535,0.006986916,0.00871486,0.14154835],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001899241,0.000049128474,0.0002598676,0.000014780828,0.000004858388,0.00009806022,0.000042919,0.000038360966,0.00009874952,0.022899829,0.9489146,0.027559953],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007441531,0.000017546177,0.00070403086,0.000029285311,0.0000030357767,0.00004792087,0.00008651526,0.00006736877,0.000042630727,0.0032416536,0.995743,0.000009623896],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0099905245,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.039905246,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15810223,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030066448,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014711415,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5289047},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2022829871","doi":"10.1108/17542431111147783","title":"Lessons learned from a comparative examination of global civil justice reforms","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Law and Management","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Originality; Scope (computer science); Economic Justice; Mediation; Civil procedure; Alternative dispute resolution; Value (mathematics); Civil society; Dispute resolution; Public administration; Political science; Judicial reform; Sociology; Law; Law and economics; Public relations; Computer science","score_opus":0.13252499292022324,"score_gpt":0.38311593089861873,"score_spread":0.2505909379783955,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2022829871","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6659356,0.028985435,0.0031007265,0.03258477,0.00053259794,0.00018900487,0.00038265003,0.00004999961,0.26823917],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99300414,0.004119478,0.00062192976,0.0012392041,0.000058945858,0.000022879834,0.00006983991,0.000012081457,0.0008514606],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9855444,0.009206577,0.00046122307,0.00090814015,0.0016606081,0.0022189817],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97611654,0.015779868,0.0018004752,0.0021285024,0.0035141797,0.00066051085],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013611133,0.0002745285,0.0005951991,0.0048218444,0.0028178832,0.00595035,0.0010559241,0.0014234369,0.006604087],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026543211,0.0002074724,0.00039768746,0.009695442,0.010087043,0.0071503776,0.0045703007,0.0025532795,0.00016068366],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00030342583,0.0002111654,0.043937452,0.0021736908,0.00028835004,0.0019966208,0.13625386,0.0038148863,0.0010645977,0.574659,0.011623533,0.22367336],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010055488,0.0006707882,0.26711273,0.0047206446,0.00044985337,0.0008880172,0.39907938,0.0018206972,0.0031220578,0.053062577,0.26884177,0.00013102114],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.054217465,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10330194,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.054217465,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010725232,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0074385256,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10780376},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2027083919","doi":"10.1002/iir.186","title":"When Hong Kong becomes SAR, is the mainland ready? Problems of judgments recognition in cross‐border insolvency matters","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Insolvency Review","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mainland China; Insolvency; China; Mainland; Law; Political science; Political status of Taiwan; The Republic; Convergence (economics); Geography; Economics; Economic growth","score_opus":0.045173202571408694,"score_gpt":0.38651919300346776,"score_spread":0.34134599043205904,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2027083919","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.59804374,0.096207924,0.0012319068,0.102946065,0.0016433218,0.00009950645,0.0002725456,0.000031567866,0.19952337],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9672838,0.016970795,0.00027690618,0.007264077,0.00023138673,0.00001762112,0.000079110934,0.0000058829874,0.007870409],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9959651,0.0014477342,0.00043724355,0.00029404036,0.00083349535,0.0010223619],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98907274,0.0055867177,0.0015061125,0.00025620701,0.0029525198,0.0006257211],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010211112,0.0001309546,0.00043855447,0.0012749528,0.0029718548,0.0054982807,0.000830946,0.0015128382,0.0020528447],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014429199,0.0001926139,0.0002621943,0.0015998558,0.004335331,0.0023485469,0.0012071932,0.0021238958,0.00021853858],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00027893452,0.000111251116,0.09255266,0.0018990398,0.00023288811,0.013816583,0.11016152,0.0020050677,0.0012373114,0.43115634,0.14689201,0.19965638],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007192692,0.00018294701,0.23380218,0.003312362,0.0002311007,0.0020833754,0.20605195,0.0011955269,0.0018872162,0.031192202,0.5197895,0.00019966539],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.27145562,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.32971692,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.27145562,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009630982,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015809834,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5397512},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2032914253","doi":"10.1093/tandt/ttm100","title":"A need for greater understanding of civil law entities by common law jurisdictions","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Trusts & Trustees","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Common law; Civil law (Civil law); Political science; Convention; Parliament; Trust law; Ratification; Statutory law; Municipal law; Public law; Politics","score_opus":0.045703478445133006,"score_gpt":0.31733983811627103,"score_spread":0.27163635967113803,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2032914253","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02202604,0.046667244,0.14543413,0.66467077,0.0038928022,0.0002508302,0.00021179426,0.0001748187,0.116671585],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.71925503,0.04154051,0.06774462,0.14469081,0.011715972,0.00084604986,0.00048330388,0.00043494927,0.013288831],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9511752,0.032479197,0.002541015,0.0047533656,0.004946908,0.0041043335],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8103687,0.14852032,0.0102225,0.01365276,0.011328686,0.0059070606],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06710496,0.0017428003,0.0035672502,0.01026165,0.009251784,0.031647578,0.00952819,0.023084365,0.0102232015],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0730015,0.001712887,0.0021564665,0.008186226,0.122702956,0.1623971,0.015084759,0.057795193,0.0016859063],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005350453,0.000011566759,0.00015289096,0.000048710463,0.000004224882,0.000039994793,0.00990216,0.00016382641,0.000025384299,0.9842376,0.002261598,0.003146637],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008971101,0.000017569657,0.0005749864,0.00068000105,0.0000049359014,0.00018684095,0.015951745,0.0007435766,0.000056130648,0.9110488,0.07068487,0.00004148492],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.035843927,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018281134,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06710496,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016518475,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019269407,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35488915},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W203387216","doi":"","title":"Complexity of Transnational Sources: Reports to the XVIIIth International Congress of Comparative Law: Complexity of Transnational Sources: Canada","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Comparative law; Law; Legal pluralism; International law; Municipal law; Legal culture; Sovereignty; Convention; Private law; Public law; Legal realism; Politics","score_opus":0.06387599090077564,"score_gpt":0.29929243021675184,"score_spread":0.2354164393159762,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W203387216","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11904119,0.07731494,0.002169476,0.31497332,0.0026589402,0.00065714517,0.013350485,0.00026181617,0.4695727],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.65304977,0.09145109,0.003967977,0.01875003,0.0005905906,0.00033881952,0.0069609955,0.00040160885,0.22448915],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9862998,0.0007176499,0.00027959724,0.00089783943,0.0095675755,0.0022376503],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9841176,0.002273339,0.00053719024,0.0005107133,0.01016075,0.0024003806],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007123893,0.0009678712,0.0007978768,0.013443311,0.04158846,0.021366475,0.003439271,0.004084441,0.0117448],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013883899,0.0009683366,0.00067573367,0.027018733,0.009474689,0.0044175666,0.006663166,0.0054424433,0.0005860941],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000844153,0.00010006054,0.02335274,0.00088116404,0.000115091134,0.0006158836,0.055315744,0.0011840601,0.00078821485,0.17057322,0.6623951,0.08459426],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021746671,0.000013238024,0.03853253,0.00066233496,0.00007176487,0.00013217947,0.051746707,0.00057376514,0.0006606207,0.005095618,0.90231127,0.00017826377],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99803597,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9989335,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.25194433,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.25194433,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.37240815,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8676385},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2035879332","doi":"10.1017/s0008423904330106","title":"Shaping Nations: Constitutionalism and Society in Australia and Canada","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Political Science","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Mount Allison University","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Political science; Public administration; Law; Politics; Democracy","score_opus":0.0400795645033957,"score_gpt":0.3216511488129375,"score_spread":0.28157158430954177,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2035879332","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2694938,0.1087799,0.003387062,0.156405,0.0008088077,0.00008597433,0.0008028809,0.00007313608,0.4601634],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94807065,0.021364458,0.0013974375,0.0021785926,0.00009969692,0.000025885998,0.00019172054,0.00003300208,0.026638579],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961461,0.0009005571,0.00009046531,0.00027259268,0.0012997985,0.0012904081],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99669826,0.00075441354,0.00026484538,0.0001018893,0.0011455258,0.0010351252],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028541812,0.00030296302,0.0004785636,0.003073182,0.013366689,0.011837616,0.0012090413,0.0020393876,0.0043101753],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007751927,0.00026915074,0.00024907527,0.0077249533,0.021990098,0.003975869,0.0042077624,0.0024912353,0.0001780165],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036519166,0.000024184494,0.0107430285,0.00012734607,0.000024535,0.00024814802,0.04415934,0.0021861095,0.00020059108,0.86376894,0.030832196,0.047649015],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001853295,0.000023818258,0.10424826,0.0006718765,0.00005023845,0.00020360298,0.07206461,0.0023939135,0.00036304738,0.17996772,0.6398276,0.0001667819],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9899653,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9948301,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12173468,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.12173468,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.15694095,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8832511},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2039856143","doi":"10.7202/043363ar","title":"Les difficultés de l'introduction du forum non conveniens en droit québécois","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Ministère des Transports; Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0061904801856654075,"score_gpt":0.24040413880298447,"score_spread":0.23421365861731908,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2039856143","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17497908,0.009971883,0.015140533,0.14342669,0.0037231406,0.00025608993,0.0006492563,0.00025748266,0.6515959],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6130715,0.0021045029,0.0027852731,0.008318538,0.00028748234,0.00011757356,0.00014769082,0.00012505712,0.37304232],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9944561,0.0018379663,0.000105181425,0.00060167164,0.0015447293,0.0014543962],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99409544,0.0023542286,0.00025211138,0.00025792024,0.0022942747,0.0007460906],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006043098,0.00047008984,0.0003116659,0.0017934436,0.018616565,0.0095861675,0.0016329398,0.004731184,0.017264737],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010255879,0.00039722616,0.0003901556,0.0017315611,0.0077507277,0.003863294,0.0037731756,0.0050910916,0.0010823446],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004088743,0.000025778723,0.0025379802,0.00013256083,0.0000069312923,0.000948009,0.124678195,0.00047890205,0.0008067784,0.7043001,0.1166035,0.04944043],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011965842,0.00001794173,0.006005642,0.0003908046,0.000008958925,0.00009770814,0.03989539,0.0005379527,0.000411349,0.012097273,0.94047594,0.000049072536],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8758368,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9271901,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12416321,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.059324052,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.057734463,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.43042815},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2040883501","doi":"10.7202/043831ar","title":"Le projet d’un code civil européen et la Constitution européenne","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Constitution; Art; Law","score_opus":0.012496212421012941,"score_gpt":0.2652909958345235,"score_spread":0.2527947834135105,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2040883501","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10213186,0.010666213,0.013347982,0.12268808,0.0020257086,0.00012585548,0.00018928277,0.00009459676,0.7487305],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.77876085,0.0044921176,0.008663896,0.013361624,0.0006469454,0.0002841664,0.00021522645,0.00013436234,0.19344072],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98669213,0.006617142,0.00044866573,0.00092591956,0.0034221427,0.0018940638],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98855305,0.0055057183,0.000888098,0.0013679622,0.0023827509,0.001302543],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010264092,0.0004096809,0.00041558687,0.0026324,0.007357313,0.011261555,0.0009923276,0.0063825455,0.0086890245],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018752672,0.00031265485,0.00058327045,0.002667297,0.017154096,0.0056104036,0.0065058228,0.006607902,0.0010610027],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010318707,0.000014343316,0.0004573705,0.000019709802,0.0000027577746,0.000050242023,0.0025656992,0.00012759467,0.000080850645,0.98450214,0.0045132884,0.007655728],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000038682087,0.00006218998,0.0067253322,0.00040725523,0.000009495414,0.00014512902,0.005666928,0.00035787592,0.00047377314,0.16928017,0.816791,0.000042103853],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.032973118,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024687061,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.032973118,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010920993,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.021468854,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0792377},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2042926290","doi":"10.7202/042692ar","title":"Cabinet Action and the CRTC: An Examination of Section 23 of the Broadcasting Act","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Cabinet (room); Philosophy; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.016500125239373917,"score_gpt":0.2658498635612593,"score_spread":0.24934973832188537,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2042926290","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.51593935,0.0056992103,0.0009991585,0.03318457,0.0002026664,0.00011474001,0.00012256426,0.00001823495,0.44371948],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97775537,0.0010823435,0.00023316586,0.003335891,0.000051341416,0.00007086825,0.000034535293,0.000014021325,0.017422568],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9804052,0.00913222,0.0006315062,0.0007305529,0.005336272,0.0037642436],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97133,0.020631416,0.0040198984,0.0006259856,0.0022732785,0.0011192616],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009195861,0.0001597429,0.00021897514,0.00140942,0.009964213,0.007899784,0.0014771529,0.0036604917,0.005480366],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029042497,0.00033632523,0.00031822154,0.002551972,0.009207381,0.002354672,0.0024624998,0.005101696,0.00047676847],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008682355,0.0001460621,0.023439538,0.00016286326,0.000011265882,0.0013368184,0.1818671,0.000412449,0.0007335403,0.751938,0.014495277,0.025370343],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000043200595,0.00018130822,0.19414257,0.0015778487,0.000044601733,0.00060016935,0.26290753,0.0008152477,0.0011128879,0.019945351,0.51851153,0.00011781412],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.23204245,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.26959634,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9829162,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017083837,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.024483684,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.46138358},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2043056765","doi":"10.7202/050494ar","title":"D'un entrepreneur à  un autre: l'accréditation ne suit pas","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Relations industrielles","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.028849901238712443,"score_gpt":0.2722235304039143,"score_spread":0.24337362916520183,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2043056765","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.074067794,0.001934353,0.008401653,0.3101592,0.005189659,0.00013109542,0.000055445966,0.00013513578,0.59992576],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5334186,0.0009957969,0.0027284615,0.06494554,0.00072640757,0.000087238725,0.000029899245,0.00010144557,0.3969666],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9884986,0.0035709792,0.00037102716,0.0014310355,0.0033014603,0.002826819],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98630095,0.003640345,0.0010941344,0.0011975747,0.0032445996,0.0045222766],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0073418464,0.0004534947,0.00044869867,0.0008248535,0.018282061,0.0115286065,0.0011469803,0.00702466,0.020960968],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023530172,0.00042202804,0.00052602764,0.00062076654,0.016324984,0.005435211,0.0077160145,0.009639277,0.0046466],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000115897026,0.00013787391,0.011847975,0.0001517973,0.000030227604,0.0016249939,0.050676808,0.00012281905,0.0017913143,0.7557433,0.12811883,0.049638204],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000035070963,0.0000843091,0.006556738,0.00043975655,0.000027714908,0.0012197638,0.039091915,0.0003318792,0.0011843526,0.07752671,0.87341565,0.00008623002],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.057538956,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11091724,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.057538956,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0056068404,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020802198,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.114408076},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2048908424","doi":"10.7202/043109ar","title":"L'harmonisation du droit dans les transferts de fonds internationaux par télécommunications interbancaires","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Art","score_opus":0.015500558427110208,"score_gpt":0.26377479318932145,"score_spread":0.24827423476221125,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2048908424","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4041407,0.0023452605,0.044603396,0.010115617,0.00035240102,0.00041931754,0.00018778202,0.00018325144,0.53765225],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85519683,0.0006912341,0.0120242145,0.00078923046,0.000061631996,0.0002926583,0.00012367818,0.0000935018,0.13072692],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9911089,0.00310311,0.00043923742,0.0009784994,0.0027030096,0.0016671612],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99334323,0.0023856722,0.0008898052,0.0010328597,0.0017461675,0.0006022899],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0083117485,0.00035889176,0.00034912693,0.0015836412,0.005867407,0.006967077,0.0014225894,0.0019838845,0.011394159],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014870557,0.00035321273,0.0004175543,0.0025607003,0.0046549533,0.0040964475,0.006568461,0.0027219327,0.0011847364],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022571656,0.00022408011,0.029635767,0.00028259167,0.00005545935,0.0009073198,0.07881445,0.0044963076,0.0055804877,0.6017956,0.008985371,0.26899678],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008285539,0.00053728814,0.12025036,0.0010142458,0.00008091853,0.0011580487,0.07411668,0.0033202094,0.008030766,0.0708489,0.7203465,0.00021335117],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04022583,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.065917596,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04022583,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009926675,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013637612,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07998341},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2049289738","doi":"10.7202/042699ar","title":"L'effectivité des décisions de justice en droit international privé","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Section (typography); Statutory law; Conflict of laws; Law; Political science; International law; Economic Justice; Law and economics; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.010629454037191385,"score_gpt":0.2913040966234156,"score_spread":0.2806746425862242,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2049289738","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08527658,0.0075611165,0.008544652,0.057356182,0.00061896985,0.000153609,0.00028198966,0.00009879566,0.8401081],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8592862,0.0023731065,0.0022679267,0.0059110443,0.0002326014,0.00007152745,0.00006517072,0.000050361756,0.12974212],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9807835,0.006387733,0.00033729736,0.0011700751,0.0065678065,0.004753588],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98820937,0.0060335645,0.00083451474,0.0005205453,0.003171124,0.0012308476],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013055324,0.00055237283,0.0004433505,0.0014208684,0.00914481,0.014102438,0.0014463568,0.004702901,0.011796683],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021064632,0.00032947763,0.00060256023,0.0011851765,0.010393993,0.002652628,0.0028077343,0.006105722,0.0009690912],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000103608,0.000070649396,0.006452845,0.00013005966,0.00005794427,0.0006717734,0.007175752,0.0040200585,0.00091988995,0.8994498,0.039910812,0.041036814],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012163509,0.00022063173,0.039885294,0.0010713774,0.00010848515,0.00055824814,0.018110156,0.0068816044,0.0030142292,0.092001826,0.8377753,0.00025115965],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8390642,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8937208,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8390642,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.049167287,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.059827007,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35673535},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2051603156","doi":"10.1017/s0020589313000481","title":"<i>RE FLIGHTLEASE</i>: THE ‘REAL AND SUBSTANTIAL CONNECTION’ TEST FOR RECOGNITION AND ENFORCEMENT OF FOREIGN JUDGMENTS FAILS TO TAKE FLIGHT IN IRELAND","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International and Comparative Law Quarterly","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Trinity College","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Irish; Law; Enforcement; Political science; Test (biology); Common law; Linguistics","score_opus":0.05449964257874465,"score_gpt":0.3126494242527124,"score_spread":0.25814978167396774,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2051603156","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.35386223,0.00035260795,0.002408318,0.078442596,0.0008896525,0.00022969168,0.000751442,0.00006821238,0.5629952],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9739974,0.000089190486,0.0007796921,0.0121792685,0.00013967455,0.00005724502,0.00017126427,0.000028349828,0.012557931],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97803324,0.004544307,0.0015930096,0.0031745408,0.00531772,0.0073372247],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9669161,0.013561384,0.0027064295,0.003195401,0.009215384,0.004405309],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022021161,0.00030339137,0.00092722947,0.002204876,0.008142817,0.009261417,0.0032815635,0.006425393,0.010745513],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0820108,0.00046963166,0.0010866609,0.0013466638,0.019475715,0.004415692,0.004932674,0.009949393,0.0012088238],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005502242,0.0002882303,0.06549614,0.0001165439,0.00015500063,0.0023772805,0.017829612,0.0009909,0.0011104764,0.77799463,0.115320176,0.017770689],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006146448,0.00066638936,0.20029075,0.001539042,0.0005657294,0.0020715594,0.15344174,0.008524366,0.008706334,0.31932014,0.3032092,0.0010502049],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.40270895,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4818674,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.40270895,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013862214,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.029481385,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8007299},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W20592825","doi":"","title":"COMMENTI ALLA GIURISPRUDENZA - Sull'inimpugnabilità dell'ordinanza presidenziale in tema di sostituzione di arbitro","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Rassegna di diritto civile","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.031706117231919684,"score_gpt":0.29634892530314166,"score_spread":0.264642808071222,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W20592825","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.056049585,0.016670262,0.0010169399,0.8805202,0.01901598,0.00017072435,0.0031048579,0.00027460666,0.023176845],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2553167,0.009389109,0.0029054708,0.6214298,0.02816192,0.00034978698,0.0012669339,0.00019059629,0.08098975],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99807286,0.00060051243,0.00023843035,0.00028954042,0.0005807175,0.00021788105],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9856582,0.007928604,0.0013378258,0.00062464783,0.0037525527,0.00069808686],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004675254,0.00027677204,0.0004259652,0.000285393,0.000721271,0.0013453517,0.0013196296,0.003381547,0.013972684],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016298776,0.00013333988,0.0003966947,0.00040637274,0.001035252,0.00060587557,0.0004672891,0.0026503582,0.002972472],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0018896012,0.00023660022,0.05237974,0.00083937676,0.00014110969,0.00105299,0.001260513,0.00028288836,0.0029439714,0.0024606904,0.84630924,0.09020331],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00029013926,0.00074663165,0.094747365,0.00060540444,0.00014354473,0.0010327052,0.0014857297,0.0006806647,0.0038952169,0.0017360393,0.8945545,0.00008212776],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.057924945,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07808246,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.057924945,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026581504,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020442205,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.115175605},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2061027942","doi":"10.7202/1023204ar","title":"La parenté et les traités / Kinship and Treaties","year":2013,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Kinship; Sociology; Anthropology","score_opus":0.02843450506027186,"score_gpt":0.27790625742558295,"score_spread":0.24947175236531108,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2061027942","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.036266692,0.08333542,0.0033191498,0.12727787,0.005148825,0.00005267347,0.00033690984,0.000063138395,0.7441993],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.64604944,0.024625694,0.0022383856,0.03024965,0.0025533389,0.00015911928,0.00019578931,0.00012432801,0.29380417],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99389327,0.0029898998,0.00026570223,0.00049783644,0.0011981707,0.0011550635],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966574,0.0019872026,0.00033796087,0.00028955692,0.0005140433,0.00021373958],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0045570456,0.0005022225,0.00068030274,0.00095944246,0.006011893,0.00691827,0.0012032029,0.007445152,0.01213228],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012412042,0.00038705656,0.0004650151,0.0019762819,0.007529821,0.0037383349,0.002717614,0.010063174,0.0013685719],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023825394,0.000014624214,0.00036929816,0.000045802793,0.00000748447,0.0001098358,0.002248339,0.00007513517,0.000092092836,0.9610578,0.027104618,0.008851132],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000056718265,0.000041271327,0.002988361,0.00053249724,0.000025482166,0.00036372163,0.0025825372,0.00017159723,0.00021188743,0.11469805,0.8782906,0.000037297275],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06331051,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06059853,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06331051,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005176441,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008094473,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.125884},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2062031903","doi":"10.1093/ejil/chr072","title":"General Principles and Comparative Law","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Journal of International Law","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Scholarship; Political science; Comparative law; Relevance (law); International law; Legal research; Representativeness heuristic; Philosophy of law; Sociology; Law and economics; Psychology","score_opus":0.12568925113219045,"score_gpt":0.3191628386966847,"score_spread":0.19347358756449426,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2062031903","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008159627,0.05878363,0.0801896,0.04133091,0.001332907,0.00012255348,0.00029698462,0.00012364845,0.8096601],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8176601,0.035757165,0.07011709,0.019261405,0.0038100912,0.000908472,0.0007549102,0.0002989635,0.051431738],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98787296,0.007934118,0.00038312134,0.0013509736,0.0018191304,0.0006397952],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9930266,0.0047137905,0.0003576774,0.0011064037,0.00061895134,0.00017656833],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01125555,0.00073736854,0.001232435,0.0060028415,0.0052910047,0.008576914,0.0021557081,0.0043587987,0.010097596],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011867746,0.00037116863,0.0008519523,0.005599295,0.041797403,0.012035849,0.0056001446,0.0047293454,0.001229574],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000010187883,0.0000017491667,0.000025678679,0.00002097326,0.000001856563,0.0000069830544,0.00036321813,0.000042839103,0.000005618951,0.9970932,0.00088011235,0.0015565865],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002656669,0.000003802463,0.00008081594,0.00008786503,0.0000020357834,0.000040553994,0.0003707303,0.00009005168,0.000016656188,0.95110565,0.048196234,0.0000029263856],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0039322386,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027624615,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01125555,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0072305487,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028595359,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05952573},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2066178597","doi":"10.1093/nq/51.2.184","title":"Review: The Beginnings of English Law","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Notes and Queries","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"English law; Classics; History; Media studies; Law; Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.016568394844404543,"score_gpt":0.2911095621237957,"score_spread":0.27454116727939115,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2066178597","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00002102475,0.9919593,0.00003250755,0.0057830457,0.001037511,0.0000029282112,0.00002678329,0.000002855593,0.0011340381],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0009890898,0.99207896,0.00009348755,0.00418922,0.0018463884,0.000015256622,0.000038826027,0.000004577689,0.0007441719],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9948619,0.0024975035,0.00074144057,0.00029558723,0.0012934221,0.00031012335],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97974545,0.014584087,0.0013455441,0.00042928156,0.00336991,0.00052574155],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0049586585,0.0008483964,0.0032743302,0.0067380676,0.0010339416,0.006062089,0.0014874133,0.003245314,0.013380342],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023090048,0.0005620846,0.0010391898,0.00921794,0.0030312238,0.0073473495,0.0021194275,0.0039196014,0.0037048075],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000083782266,0.00001728493,0.00017363582,0.039962254,0.00019964426,0.00014543584,0.0006615283,0.00012011058,0.00013505026,0.02528943,0.6589368,0.27427512],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001533611,0.000017484766,0.0006488624,0.059830405,0.00010460948,0.00016861754,0.00030883646,0.000019078856,0.000029284936,0.007492741,0.9313545,0.0000101871765],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006457788,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017047588,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013380342,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0053916513,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011901198,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.044761717},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W206675118","doi":"","title":"Federation of law societies of Canada v Canada (attorney general)","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"UWE Research Repository (UWE Bristol)","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.03423450943527855,"score_gpt":0.31483914850243433,"score_spread":0.28060463906715577,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W206675118","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019997982,0.0096643,0.0011720661,0.20804416,0.005713518,0.000675519,0.007241033,0.0004883688,0.7470031],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.11672374,0.0047964905,0.0020357377,0.13331099,0.0007255892,0.000414261,0.0015392414,0.00027880503,0.74017525],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9812238,0.00078463013,0.0008424586,0.0011277869,0.008981265,0.007040076],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9731435,0.0038804251,0.00079021056,0.0008733472,0.017053612,0.0042589265],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006478149,0.0006458711,0.0010246655,0.0040477486,0.029707035,0.01253012,0.004510842,0.024799999,0.038863927],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027030123,0.0017931449,0.001359731,0.0051680207,0.0036506134,0.0036220555,0.0029656151,0.011218455,0.004833335],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005900237,0.000048580285,0.002965776,0.00014491436,0.000035021316,0.00035084478,0.0013939003,0.00014720738,0.00024691632,0.088952415,0.89313483,0.012520536],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000054308377,0.000016515814,0.01044446,0.00044454157,0.00007947773,0.00010975229,0.0019243612,0.0002479456,0.0003535189,0.004452295,0.9817739,0.00009896069],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98973185,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99422824,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06330234,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06330234,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.38992545,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.45929277},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2068102555","doi":"10.1177/0363199013484714","title":"Ireland and the Divorce and Matrimonial Causes Act of 1857","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Family History","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":55,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"British Academy","keywords":"Irish; Parliament; Law; Political science; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.022311094138322773,"score_gpt":0.26062171628748015,"score_spread":0.23831062214915738,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2068102555","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18527283,0.0070296116,0.0010134999,0.035977058,0.0012214526,0.00009417681,0.00070367183,0.000047619236,0.76864016],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8840787,0.0027161234,0.0007345632,0.01962167,0.0004986788,0.00015402275,0.0005969662,0.00007755504,0.09152178],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98614013,0.0025396165,0.00056420825,0.00056445604,0.0038898226,0.006301829],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9944283,0.0011949885,0.00088564097,0.0003348811,0.0016919259,0.0014643454],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00633091,0.00027403477,0.00054827775,0.0024477167,0.00838517,0.0056124707,0.0016954151,0.0027043612,0.0056909774],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013550041,0.00046355618,0.0007175557,0.0018073466,0.009958613,0.002123556,0.006623253,0.0077225664,0.001157187],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000112981696,0.00010357111,0.025275197,0.000098813536,0.000047063833,0.00093394896,0.023773456,0.00035187067,0.00016796507,0.8256733,0.08281751,0.040644374],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000040497205,0.000053020238,0.045198396,0.00039419995,0.000029834095,0.00018711884,0.010594162,0.000121097924,0.00029373314,0.011403057,0.93160164,0.00008327258],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.31026074,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.44944972,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31026074,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.026406348,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.028500319,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6169096},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2068997246","doi":"10.2202/1535-1661.1039","title":"North America as a Medieval Legal Construction","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Global Jurist Advances","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Legal history; Law; Core (optical fiber); History; Public administration; Engineering","score_opus":0.009992982864664449,"score_gpt":0.2861688978961509,"score_spread":0.2761759150314865,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2068997246","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019932555,0.010375358,0.0005255774,0.0104508605,0.00027416137,0.0000074440327,0.00007624841,0.000020689507,0.95833707],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7270012,0.0072281198,0.000983404,0.0025682254,0.00028279767,0.000038462735,0.00012620192,0.000038963764,0.2617326],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997017,0.00009573266,0.0000066594184,0.00007530944,0.000063963445,0.000056581957],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99989986,0.000026553997,0.000012778737,0.000015401287,0.000025877991,0.000019548903],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003222343,0.0001699808,0.00012663617,0.00073112844,0.0042288257,0.0033758439,0.00025132933,0.0007845141,0.008641199],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00044047774,0.000115545,0.0000742682,0.0010839795,0.005750759,0.002184466,0.0017695399,0.0012750451,0.00054950354],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000070656283,0.000009100185,0.000509941,0.000018782292,0.0000026103787,0.000082211314,0.0080985315,0.00006778014,0.00010035959,0.95033616,0.022686742,0.01808071],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000024926112,0.0000042600973,0.0021877612,0.000078714875,0.0000029571484,0.000091110094,0.00276779,0.000058134607,0.00006774066,0.05458038,0.94015527,0.000003348716],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.048142068,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14094537,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9518579,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0060598133,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026153119,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09572369},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2073539553","doi":"10.5430/wjel.v5n1p14","title":"Mutual Determination between Clausal Constituents","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Journal of English Language","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.03205743483887837,"score_gpt":0.3313195534517456,"score_spread":0.2992621186128672,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2073539553","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17153557,0.0012460413,0.4613541,0.0018519773,0.00019575699,0.000773833,0.00040316166,0.001311195,0.3613283],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9415078,0.0002173606,0.043959647,0.00026883234,0.00014374361,0.0003386324,0.00029144788,0.00039659935,0.0128757525],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.986153,0.0062186243,0.0008004756,0.002590388,0.0033123181,0.00092517096],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.989892,0.0050442494,0.0009703453,0.0016156374,0.0022682708,0.00020948616],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009215145,0.00078047125,0.0006765807,0.0017742005,0.0041413247,0.0043791607,0.0020262115,0.0012975576,0.009013019],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0167944,0.0015887665,0.00091399736,0.001367318,0.005261062,0.008770491,0.0056329677,0.0021685853,0.001750561],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005618397,0.000025615183,0.001222703,0.00012300964,0.000036216577,0.00024053386,0.009540477,0.00026308134,0.0046660267,0.96074414,0.00095712923,0.022124873],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006242721,0.00011111904,0.0042463923,0.00020889456,0.00019048202,0.0007125159,0.0043486306,0.005811402,0.01609728,0.8841511,0.08394223,0.0001176181],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019823913,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002618818,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009215145,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025217757,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002718493,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.048734963},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2079812163","doi":"10.7202/042612ar","title":"L'action d'intérêt collectif","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Collective action; Action (physics); Interest group; Order (exchange); Public interest; Law and economics; Value (mathematics); Political science; Special Interest Group; Epistemology; Sociology; Law; Business; Philosophy; Politics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.01617772241720579,"score_gpt":0.28467555323283517,"score_spread":0.2684978308156294,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2079812163","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014376915,0.003165731,0.015809827,0.021592172,0.0020782447,0.00019448496,0.0002684947,0.0003846684,0.9421296],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.36018533,0.0035819146,0.012109845,0.011338222,0.003256814,0.0010362123,0.00032942754,0.00030946636,0.60785276],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98241836,0.0060001127,0.0005168867,0.0019155394,0.0075513097,0.0015976902],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9912736,0.0036570835,0.0010750432,0.0015432185,0.0016162491,0.0008347848],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009893718,0.0014531707,0.0011109541,0.001882521,0.012196936,0.013111248,0.0015696438,0.005010215,0.03055629],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010730808,0.0007402047,0.0016339973,0.0014801451,0.012904646,0.0057367436,0.007820028,0.011953881,0.0073833624],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000056083558,0.00006621847,0.0009146654,0.00015962799,0.00004226882,0.00032054554,0.0056017064,0.00016337466,0.0007946114,0.9263264,0.026427515,0.039126948],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004625036,0.00009828286,0.0031892378,0.00020804376,0.000013569663,0.0005759127,0.0018502129,0.00025737158,0.0006664576,0.037664182,0.95539063,0.00003986011],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.025423829,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.026106287,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03055629,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0071289754,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0071312496,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10222095},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2081632868","doi":"10.7202/1013028ar","title":"Legal Hybridity in Hong Kong and Macau","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Hybridity; Mainland China; China; Political science; Ideology; Acknowledgement; Politics; Law; Sociology; Anthropology","score_opus":0.0273633526495178,"score_gpt":0.30415470072908285,"score_spread":0.27679134807956507,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2081632868","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9574136,0.0006012275,0.00028259188,0.0011751585,0.000016962029,0.000038175345,0.000026872418,0.000009533083,0.04043593],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99771,0.00007987701,0.00010126485,0.00012598817,0.0000014890222,0.000013988609,0.000009981308,0.0000015622777,0.0019557688],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99788696,0.0006024516,0.00006990704,0.00020808578,0.00026767838,0.00096485193],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99852896,0.00042565007,0.00025230166,0.00015905789,0.00024882538,0.0003852141],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015126365,0.00020908535,0.00026091453,0.0016251798,0.010365456,0.005543087,0.0011942288,0.0007388572,0.0034624464],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029419942,0.00032678017,0.00027256046,0.0025169046,0.012403003,0.0021622765,0.0054563163,0.0014895698,0.00011099461],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022166267,0.00008522515,0.11187131,0.00018368632,0.00009502223,0.015152584,0.27610713,0.0010356659,0.0015772288,0.5697212,0.0023953533,0.021553988],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000112956164,0.00022966237,0.23208305,0.00048145818,0.0001747225,0.004265721,0.5950761,0.0038442693,0.0021275156,0.033896174,0.12755999,0.00014840558],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5108503,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.58317506,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5108503,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03528231,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014572433,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98406076},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2090573100","doi":"10.1287/ited.1080.0016tn","title":"<b>Teaching Note</b>—Bidding on Priceline","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"INFORMS Transactions on Education","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Bidding; Case teaching; Computer science; Teaching method; Mathematics education; Business; Marketing; Psychology","score_opus":0.025943531337462022,"score_gpt":0.3369896970146339,"score_spread":0.31104616567717186,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2090573100","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0009306354,0.000092837974,0.0026958068,0.003490535,0.002396163,0.00085822947,0.0037202898,0.004102735,0.98171276],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0051744496,0.0001099334,0.0019877807,0.0013500734,0.0007436491,0.000287228,0.0019531073,0.0015067535,0.98688704],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993098,0.00007192103,0.000043146585,0.00007579007,0.00040250213,0.00009679786],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9939687,0.0015626252,0.00023164676,0.00058438827,0.002083537,0.0015690299],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007245105,0.000653325,0.0005377813,0.0010625114,0.001409167,0.0025535647,0.001097528,0.0020284797,0.91942024],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008063487,0.00055623037,0.00040350616,0.00078809506,0.00037267982,0.0019161779,0.001437665,0.0016764004,0.8347413],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030591444,0.00003670788,0.00006756965,0.000018346089,4.4525316e-7,0.000031345735,0.000009183666,0.000018008204,0.00028038214,0.00063885073,0.9792691,0.019599346],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000047678837,0.000048399015,0.0012278113,0.000060002207,0.0000015274901,0.00015031562,0.000074499185,0.00032218487,0.000754686,0.0011535787,0.99614346,0.000015764583],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035774866,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005103219,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.91942024,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009982797,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012070978,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.114937186},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2091946373","doi":"10.1093/iclq/lei083","title":"The Enforcement of Jurisdiction Agreements Within The Brussels Regime","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International and Comparative Law Quarterly","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":169,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trinity College","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Damages; Context (archaeology); Enforcement; Political science; Subject (documents); Law; Exclusive jurisdiction; Law and economics; Sociology; Geography; Computer science","score_opus":0.026511773848800275,"score_gpt":0.3078520052260265,"score_spread":0.28134023137722625,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2091946373","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5051988,0.0025200371,0.012495852,0.0076809055,0.00022020059,0.000116115654,0.00011028241,0.000064845044,0.47159302],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9911985,0.00020290914,0.0010624381,0.00023776136,0.000037649064,0.000027980383,0.000016173353,0.0000054795546,0.007211087],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97108924,0.012321559,0.0018249269,0.0028615783,0.006199318,0.005703367],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9684739,0.021676539,0.003854816,0.002428793,0.0026272687,0.0009386881],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012157982,0.00023700217,0.00076320174,0.002815412,0.007298403,0.010123485,0.0018561612,0.006234587,0.006223539],"category_scores_gemma":[0.037945315,0.0005514496,0.00058109744,0.0022728895,0.01286666,0.0033008438,0.0059132464,0.0048301066,0.0007378848],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000900414,0.000061350096,0.0030705128,0.00007305557,0.000042862288,0.0009486168,0.0037566551,0.0037306943,0.0009775052,0.9718062,0.002278445,0.013164112],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025234374,0.0004125111,0.023245502,0.0015657184,0.0001877697,0.0016076287,0.0107115,0.018043414,0.0045106737,0.7943259,0.1447889,0.000348167],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.044432145,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04070888,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.044432145,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008377197,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008433217,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08834702},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2094742225","doi":"10.1002/iir.81","title":"Insolvency proceedings and commercial arbitration. Vezna Lazic* (1998) (The Hague‐London‐Boston, Kluwer Law International), XIII &amp; 381 pages","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Insolvency Review","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Insolvency; Arbitration; Law; Political science; Citation; Library science; Computer science","score_opus":0.04786257025933938,"score_gpt":0.3469022313133048,"score_spread":0.2990396610539654,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2094742225","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00048418532,0.9102644,0.0003743236,0.035733383,0.0017621388,0.000006077813,0.00002695986,0.000013370482,0.051335152],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.08768631,0.7900142,0.00081558706,0.027404536,0.010891381,0.000078219935,0.0001498037,0.0000563991,0.08290358],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985201,0.0005372607,0.000081362465,0.0001472781,0.0004930868,0.00022095972],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99724317,0.001771096,0.0003362192,0.000082188984,0.0004543478,0.00011304533],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024673091,0.000722887,0.0007703134,0.0026497813,0.0030017975,0.0079640895,0.0014729867,0.0058920993,0.0102708945],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0065225423,0.0005045266,0.0004082297,0.0044486225,0.0047082966,0.006635613,0.0022833385,0.0043151304,0.0026527757],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026552327,0.00003003707,0.0001692944,0.00035901784,0.000015750333,0.0000839765,0.00040734635,0.00026811962,0.000048474252,0.34909853,0.5965274,0.052965432],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024236679,0.000020607748,0.0016307709,0.0019444199,0.000018690844,0.00016721297,0.0005150203,0.0002519664,0.000112663256,0.19412,0.80117595,0.000018474393],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011283375,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022176761,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011283375,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003952849,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0042009354,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.034359574},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2094934984","doi":"10.7202/1027255ar","title":"International Child Abduction in the European Union: the Solutions Incorporated by the Council Regulation","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Convention; European union; Political science; Law; International law; Restitution; Relation (database); International trade; Economics","score_opus":0.028052473433725633,"score_gpt":0.23924357885845965,"score_spread":0.21119110542473402,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2094934984","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05722965,0.052702166,0.02098304,0.16400544,0.0046373405,0.00012067151,0.000106350046,0.00012821978,0.7000871],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8227313,0.017561054,0.02359014,0.05978631,0.0022893914,0.0002670127,0.00016134784,0.00010157794,0.07351181],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.96924186,0.012250658,0.0017743252,0.0033981574,0.010029304,0.0033056955],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9862087,0.006046412,0.002119532,0.0024071182,0.0025319841,0.0006862089],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.023760807,0.0006278627,0.0007124256,0.0019291901,0.004324343,0.01062431,0.0021470727,0.014874909,0.0030043414],"category_scores_gemma":[0.034651715,0.0004722369,0.0009862869,0.002875332,0.019527733,0.007929047,0.007837921,0.009314135,0.00048272184],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010475541,0.00001770821,0.0005802745,0.000037958842,0.000004712047,0.00008734952,0.0021581794,0.00027334277,0.000040705952,0.9753517,0.0044945544,0.01694304],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000044521694,0.000107075415,0.0053319577,0.0015581907,0.00002855283,0.0005256725,0.004181198,0.0006586808,0.00038094664,0.22569774,0.7613995,0.000085917556],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02376582,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01820792,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02376582,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011704047,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01180286,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12566066},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W21149149","doi":"10.1017/cbo9781139031288.005","title":"Conceptual issues in choice of law","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Thompson Rivers University","funders":"","keywords":"Content (measure theory); Choice of law; Computer science; Law; Law and economics; Political science; Sociology; Mathematics; Conflict of laws; Mathematical analysis","score_opus":0.044051333050067205,"score_gpt":0.2661679371781535,"score_spread":0.22211660412808631,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W21149149","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007711672,0.017517606,0.030241368,0.049853567,0.0006571715,0.000054449512,0.00018434002,0.000049901584,0.8937299],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.837173,0.011865277,0.012682695,0.0063624885,0.0010606379,0.00034168884,0.0002252931,0.00016224732,0.13012664],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9949903,0.002889337,0.00014368634,0.00050677167,0.0010283994,0.00044156483],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9957838,0.0031641999,0.0001463181,0.00038084472,0.0003407982,0.00018406597],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0066704797,0.00058969087,0.00068645464,0.0018678175,0.0044402108,0.008408591,0.0019210039,0.0041319407,0.020438032],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010623935,0.00039270797,0.00079756626,0.0030120842,0.033163253,0.013800153,0.0031828207,0.0067106653,0.0016416158],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[6.2282794e-7,8.406778e-7,0.000009515046,0.000004245287,3.2383116e-7,0.0000031530244,0.00016078031,0.000029859228,0.0000018948056,0.9984451,0.000879189,0.00046463383],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000228615,0.0000014325093,0.000030752086,0.000032390228,8.4195364e-7,0.000011490174,0.00029160772,0.000143184,0.000009012233,0.98242974,0.017045386,0.000002009191],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008148098,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0071000652,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020438032,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011728108,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035488498,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.085093796},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2121178016","doi":"10.3968/j.css.1923669720130906.2986","title":"Comparative Research on China and Taiwan’s Legal Systems: From the View of the Agent Right of Daily Household Matters","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian social science","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; China; Wife; Legislation; Mainland China; Political science; Civil code; Government (linguistics); Marriage law; Property rights; Sociology","score_opus":0.07201075717983392,"score_gpt":0.3379202921230119,"score_spread":0.265909534943178,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2121178016","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9716205,0.0012326965,0.00008529003,0.0010081591,0.000010413099,0.000007656735,0.00002657073,0.0000011427769,0.026007451],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9987663,0.00035118952,0.000027826029,0.000045628738,0.000003920536,0.00000410374,0.000026538366,6.2999493e-7,0.00077379163],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99913496,0.00033203958,0.00003790111,0.000096889344,0.00015987398,0.00023839902],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986713,0.0005276021,0.00029660054,0.00007119913,0.00023251974,0.00020087052],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001166603,0.000107336266,0.00018063566,0.0027109939,0.002783629,0.001981402,0.00050224044,0.00048225038,0.0036467179],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002926227,0.000081866456,0.00012583533,0.005465357,0.0045806235,0.0027586035,0.0014728169,0.0006571343,0.000059612317],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008825093,0.000097960445,0.17979522,0.00022068687,0.00007274646,0.0024339166,0.45751554,0.00041962622,0.0011846576,0.3111971,0.0023992339,0.044574957],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016435537,0.00010633711,0.55396205,0.00031271658,0.00003752754,0.00043116874,0.39516243,0.0008700516,0.0004121034,0.010883719,0.037774064,0.00003138179],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07871049,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15203077,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07871049,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0064033265,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00404638,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15650469},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2125352624","doi":"10.5539/jpl.v5n1p145","title":"Discriminatory or Non-Discriminatory Application of Jus Sanguinis","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Politics and Law","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nationality; Political science; Immigration; Law","score_opus":0.026210788848680285,"score_gpt":0.33377112610367005,"score_spread":0.30756033725498977,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2125352624","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.34465224,0.003423634,0.017669715,0.015125,0.000648598,0.00009982759,0.00012812775,0.000059114423,0.61819375],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9926165,0.00020329595,0.0012869155,0.00095641863,0.000045262153,0.000038018494,0.000016784268,0.000010055258,0.0048265867],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.989647,0.005482401,0.00074225955,0.00097620673,0.0017952424,0.0013569357],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9931069,0.0032096393,0.0011337574,0.0012298783,0.0009193223,0.00040054618],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0060854745,0.00021151878,0.00039201527,0.00084805535,0.00447645,0.003461622,0.000769671,0.0016653008,0.0027545202],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014355539,0.00018412695,0.00032414,0.001009637,0.023083854,0.0036355979,0.0037833685,0.0027191045,0.00026007707],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000101421565,0.000012229809,0.0034379992,0.000045018834,0.00001137742,0.00013661404,0.01327729,0.00004881694,0.0003117767,0.97482854,0.0010322268,0.006848026],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023685854,0.0001287599,0.030612031,0.00071918895,0.000065266024,0.0011493817,0.03589774,0.0007729956,0.0019491463,0.73987013,0.18870752,0.000104098945],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0053876257,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009593006,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0060854745,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022413342,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002571033,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03218341},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2129425672","doi":"10.2307/4053780","title":"Christopher W. Brooks. Lawyers, Litigation and English Society since 1450. Rio Grande, Ohio: The Hambledon Press. 1998. Pp. x, 274. $55.00. ISBN 1-85285-156-2.","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Albion A Quarterly Journal Concerned with British Studies","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"History; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.01831498222541291,"score_gpt":0.2689766822779606,"score_spread":0.25066170005254773,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2129425672","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0002688906,0.9612128,0.00019042376,0.024083842,0.0019704415,0.000011134529,0.0004218741,0.000043917797,0.011796599],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.01850062,0.8947871,0.0012509573,0.0067115803,0.003992346,0.00007778938,0.0006622813,0.00014601291,0.07387141],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989498,0.00017530206,0.00011403489,0.00013415185,0.0005161621,0.000110565205],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99590766,0.0015600825,0.0006085434,0.000115855306,0.0013404136,0.00046742393],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001759034,0.0020405953,0.0009401619,0.007327979,0.002831587,0.0027249644,0.002299489,0.004643527,0.034374576],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005780633,0.0010956008,0.00041970654,0.008667513,0.0022953465,0.009015077,0.0015237188,0.0033135435,0.011900715],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030796324,0.000014572287,0.0003416704,0.00041376022,0.000007643299,0.00004171263,0.00080689834,0.000054575165,0.000047858488,0.0054270974,0.9021417,0.090671726],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001650832,0.000017933562,0.0062826094,0.003529966,0.000020270269,0.00019596012,0.0012021047,0.00006480674,0.00013452841,0.013007563,0.97549385,0.000033952212],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1263154,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.26151127,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1263154,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0048846314,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00409671,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25116038},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2131219729","doi":"10.5539/jpl.v5n1p82","title":"The European Rules on the Choice of Forum by Individuals: An Elaboration of Law Cases","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Politics and Law","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Autonomy; Scope (computer science); Settlement (finance); Action (physics); Law; Choice of law; Political science; Set (abstract data type); European union; Elaboration; Law and economics; Conflict of laws; Business; Sociology; Computer science; International trade","score_opus":0.03962476825540101,"score_gpt":0.3331868222958622,"score_spread":0.2935620540404612,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2131219729","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13115285,0.005598923,0.04248379,0.016202206,0.0006720011,0.00060647045,0.00028336572,0.000053322623,0.80294704],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94957596,0.0022355397,0.017881358,0.00731865,0.0003314048,0.00068380317,0.00010637919,0.00004343935,0.02182341],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.968856,0.015460707,0.002307239,0.002265529,0.0063459002,0.004764632],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98100454,0.015331755,0.0008074622,0.0012791529,0.0012404292,0.00033660047],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03006041,0.0006558263,0.0012261629,0.0029558728,0.008751182,0.013960968,0.001934171,0.012471857,0.0036247338],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03498425,0.00078299025,0.0017353385,0.0034111398,0.017117668,0.009252566,0.008450049,0.007292156,0.0005474863],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011134984,0.000017373859,0.00017679285,0.000011361859,0.0000031661427,0.00017075743,0.0009921816,0.00016552633,0.00005438931,0.99600047,0.0009005362,0.0014962733],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000101093,0.000077645636,0.0026934517,0.00077265484,0.0001137899,0.00083090994,0.005509691,0.0031115785,0.0015058238,0.79431653,0.190841,0.00012576237],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010807672,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008941473,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03006041,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0066215657,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005156041,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15897655},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2135966506","doi":"10.1093/oxfordjournals.cjilaw.a000494","title":"Foreign Sovereign Immunities, Acta Jure Imperil and Acta Jure Gestionis: A Recent Exposition from the Canadian Supreme Court","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Chinese Journal of International Law","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Exposition (narrative); Supreme court; Sovereignty; Political science; Law; Art; Politics","score_opus":0.016014454812775462,"score_gpt":0.2711608097080887,"score_spread":0.25514635489531323,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2135966506","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.030090854,0.072813585,0.0017833014,0.23190677,0.0024802184,0.00006121928,0.0010100079,0.00004088781,0.65981317],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.75862706,0.04923545,0.0012251817,0.07102029,0.0027888983,0.00011806792,0.00038336785,0.00007253823,0.116529055],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961377,0.00036050042,0.00007216233,0.0002762877,0.0020358767,0.0011174595],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99716574,0.0009517852,0.00016060586,0.00008801382,0.001417867,0.00021600178],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021784378,0.00083803775,0.0006282871,0.005754291,0.025025439,0.008080656,0.0022193866,0.009103394,0.0069514774],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0065695783,0.0004814893,0.0008941291,0.00748034,0.01916708,0.0028465022,0.0024600998,0.009713374,0.0004354369],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013656746,0.000010628583,0.0007795578,0.00009895575,0.000015126173,0.00041339683,0.011098755,0.00035651686,0.0001285369,0.8857819,0.09378813,0.0075148367],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027250477,0.000017921973,0.015694149,0.00094711216,0.00009475156,0.00029641466,0.013468003,0.00067524554,0.0002712029,0.1422795,0.8260597,0.00016877266],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97707534,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9885816,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11828501,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11828501,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.068744935,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8582218},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2136784259","doi":"10.5539/jpl.v4n2p153","title":"A Comparative Study of Contract Formation and Breach of Contract and Liability in China and Ohada (Note 1) Space Contract Laws","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Politics and Law","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Frustration of purpose; Severability; Breach of contract; China; Commercial law; Law; Exclusion clause; Business; Delict; Order (exchange); Civil law (Civil law); Privity of contract; Harmonization; Contract management; Private law; Liability; Legal liability; General partnership; Comparative law; Political science; Finance; Damages; Black letter law","score_opus":0.03148638514029677,"score_gpt":0.32725972629040456,"score_spread":0.2957733411501078,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2136784259","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9722359,0.0012559266,0.00015168572,0.00051439676,0.000010545667,0.000048222148,0.000025219812,0.0000014422034,0.025756666],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971813,0.0006633577,0.000064804444,0.00006609325,0.000003980508,0.000026866217,0.000024860556,0.0000011426305,0.001967719],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971935,0.0007315621,0.00014347743,0.00015524073,0.00078146235,0.0009947688],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953473,0.002015384,0.0009788309,0.00015019649,0.00075218815,0.0007561561],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004011133,0.00017871294,0.00036214772,0.003522665,0.005551333,0.0032120338,0.0009361847,0.000613719,0.0031834443],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006799219,0.00020537531,0.00027852735,0.006455585,0.0061608264,0.0028878176,0.0027405561,0.0012092037,0.000093755734],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020732477,0.00040550547,0.3383626,0.00031948477,0.000043994372,0.0016142443,0.3475718,0.0006777944,0.0005151055,0.2666429,0.0019441325,0.041695207],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000032986965,0.00022654308,0.6610876,0.00029324825,0.00003707417,0.00029658386,0.29357424,0.0011326625,0.00044538925,0.007206143,0.035615843,0.00005161248],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.18062758,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.25298443,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18062758,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012566812,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014002922,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35915244},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2137790678","doi":"10.1111/japp.12143","title":"Licensing Parents in International Contract Pregnancies","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Philosophy","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Convention; Law; Political science; Vetting; State (computer science); Business; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.05281687393416345,"score_gpt":0.318361155103381,"score_spread":0.2655442811692175,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2137790678","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17625785,0.0020038022,0.023560269,0.03896132,0.0009900186,0.00018759588,0.000037983315,0.000058769925,0.7579423],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97333884,0.00057714654,0.0019323663,0.005714233,0.00017522767,0.00010318104,0.000013155632,0.000016494645,0.018129418],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9879125,0.007079119,0.00058531895,0.0009939913,0.0018133556,0.0016157259],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9856527,0.00972672,0.0009856891,0.0015219561,0.0013512386,0.00076169206],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018047648,0.0001909779,0.00032741914,0.00041803045,0.005299929,0.005643907,0.0009994498,0.005214612,0.005698067],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031887222,0.00031016427,0.00032573816,0.00040451484,0.016898088,0.005767952,0.006638185,0.0053694732,0.0004954091],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008221905,0.000014501351,0.00089107093,0.000007313912,0.0000011555537,0.00019499238,0.006704654,0.000059287144,0.00010240462,0.9852733,0.0013898044,0.0053534484],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006312635,0.00016148543,0.0027627954,0.00045291,0.000032713244,0.0015237306,0.022880625,0.0014961184,0.0023531278,0.6869287,0.28127438,0.00007036197],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0043636663,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0032583615,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018047648,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002142719,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0045110984,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09544623},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2144256418","doi":"10.2979/gls.2004.11.1.57","title":"Courts and Globalization","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Globalization; Political science; Law; Federalism; Politics; International law; Political economy; Sociology","score_opus":0.022804613988008548,"score_gpt":0.35212047943698704,"score_spread":0.3293158654489785,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2144256418","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011064385,0.01957808,0.003140578,0.14583275,0.0013400029,0.000031376905,0.000087663066,0.00005617541,0.81886894],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7771548,0.012078266,0.0024525188,0.09177731,0.004810489,0.00014149332,0.00014329603,0.0001507899,0.11129108],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9905494,0.003954053,0.00043458364,0.0014999836,0.0021017208,0.001460333],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9917726,0.0041540004,0.0007021089,0.0009914155,0.0015260786,0.0008536882],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0058483332,0.0003623815,0.0006879419,0.0018172218,0.009234848,0.014077526,0.0015879188,0.007940142,0.018665291],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015088216,0.00034049962,0.0005339091,0.0021682708,0.028708661,0.010327251,0.007824957,0.010496488,0.0015032172],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000014842662,0.0000040762184,0.00009407178,0.000008363196,0.0000013914565,0.000024295674,0.0010070166,0.000033257245,0.000011320421,0.99066305,0.0053957803,0.0027557216],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014389582,0.0000131054,0.000571616,0.00022245792,0.0000057377933,0.000107814776,0.001816818,0.00014764175,0.000057532037,0.7037663,0.29326195,0.0000146773655],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009522158,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0067174034,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018665291,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009511662,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0076224506,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.069012284},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2144422300","doi":"10.1002/iir.148","title":"Japanese comments on the extraterritorial effects of U.S. Chapter 15","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Insolvency Review","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Debtor; Jurisdiction; Bankruptcy; Law; Section (typography); Subject (documents); Law and economics; Political science; Economic Justice; Business; Sociology; Debt; Computer science; Creditor; Finance","score_opus":0.03185332480602369,"score_gpt":0.3565427070390647,"score_spread":0.324689382233041,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2144422300","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.030156352,0.017411612,0.0017869516,0.60201657,0.016070254,0.00016742546,0.0010498938,0.0002345009,0.33110636],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.25478345,0.013207415,0.0012232764,0.49492154,0.008953327,0.00024908708,0.0004389922,0.00020041203,0.22602259],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99684036,0.000688434,0.00042335637,0.0003002178,0.0011451188,0.0006025373],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9883922,0.0067162593,0.0009326448,0.00034673378,0.0033152183,0.0002969493],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00662878,0.0004618493,0.0005961966,0.0015368215,0.0061276783,0.0033298892,0.0010662596,0.010313112,0.014783796],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017920475,0.00049984845,0.0007194507,0.002653562,0.00256658,0.0017413351,0.0016448888,0.0064737955,0.002749516],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000105458064,0.000021131678,0.001426847,0.00032298677,0.000024535651,0.0018368803,0.011678094,0.00033209985,0.0017157993,0.0773793,0.892541,0.012615986],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015797108,0.000024521747,0.005931825,0.0003493849,0.000043417134,0.00011932126,0.0047000595,0.00017254661,0.00072287576,0.003546717,0.9843232,0.00005039238],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13841267,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.17994231,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13841267,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0069336854,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0072171227,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27521402},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2156799455","doi":"10.3968/j.css.1923669720110702.023","title":"Mandatory Rules of the Rome I Regulation: Not \"Old Wine in New Bottles\" RÈGLES IMPÉRATIVES DE RÈGLEMENT ROME I: PAS DE \"VIEUX VIN DANS DE NOUVELLES BOUTEILLES\"","year":2011,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian social science","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Convention; Autonomy; Political science; Law; Conflict of laws; Choice of law; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03199954188465159,"score_gpt":0.2686479849930979,"score_spread":0.2366484431084463,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2156799455","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.038606346,0.006095885,0.017571291,0.09488411,0.004303064,0.00018602882,0.00031156428,0.00026975758,0.83777195],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.79374236,0.0026829839,0.013890234,0.04043886,0.0026337726,0.00041059768,0.00026958797,0.00022787065,0.14570375],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.988533,0.00401867,0.0008619461,0.0017950943,0.003660751,0.001130575],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9880795,0.005351023,0.0017240357,0.0016252259,0.0026338454,0.000586292],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010242398,0.00038371788,0.00037110213,0.0008119479,0.0030740192,0.008995842,0.001727055,0.0048015383,0.0048370333],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014866205,0.0005197236,0.00062272087,0.0005937978,0.01408841,0.003417518,0.0025669304,0.007854585,0.0012230037],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026284059,0.000024258457,0.0004991964,0.00007587578,0.0000065633053,0.00006523459,0.0015652337,0.00019207735,0.00046066614,0.96344125,0.02615904,0.00748432],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007816341,0.00011315047,0.007375629,0.0015349541,0.000053747113,0.0002185263,0.00296331,0.0011026135,0.0024963832,0.20437752,0.7794978,0.00018817998],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018380284,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024689332,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018380284,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004872931,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01065325,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05416763},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2162799772","doi":"10.17159/1727-3781/2012/v15i3a2500","title":"Mixed and Mixing Systems Worldwide: A Preface","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal/Potchefstroomse Elektroniese Regsblad","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Oxford; University of Cambridge","keywords":"Scholarship; Jurisdiction; Law; State (computer science); Political science; Thriving; International law; Sociology; Social science","score_opus":0.02539429521708089,"score_gpt":0.2957537107665136,"score_spread":0.2703594155494327,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2162799772","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009301146,0.22374307,0.00531217,0.13458465,0.09223196,0.00022636341,0.00042039072,0.00011606264,0.5340642],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.17405786,0.24027058,0.00463366,0.028734928,0.08332383,0.00046055918,0.0009578032,0.00045096464,0.46710983],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994635,0.00018287802,0.000034691,0.00006692951,0.00016133035,0.00009069218],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99903345,0.00047364738,0.000064995686,0.00007328347,0.00017741376,0.00017711116],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011164444,0.00080850336,0.00044977502,0.0025068389,0.00570614,0.008784123,0.0006819557,0.0026943844,0.020757021],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0027876906,0.00039908185,0.00034124576,0.0026926436,0.0035927335,0.009747375,0.0034377284,0.006318513,0.0035339466],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028185654,0.000071289134,0.00061310513,0.00031036304,0.000005529443,0.0003063423,0.01294261,0.00014607006,0.00028847082,0.3408371,0.52363586,0.120815],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000018579685,0.000013811524,0.00071493594,0.00048263563,0.0000011099156,0.00012637951,0.0030494274,0.000043937078,0.000051073144,0.021933295,0.9735744,0.0000070870274],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032380864,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00535178,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020757021,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028513423,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020128426,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06943917},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2163544984","doi":"10.1080/10406020802046331","title":"Cross-Border Litigation Gains Traction in U.S. and Canadian Courts","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Claims Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Traction (geology); Political science; Law; Business; Engineering","score_opus":0.019022057507745067,"score_gpt":0.3458004729089937,"score_spread":0.32677841540124863,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2163544984","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20180504,0.019041397,0.0014156605,0.19030628,0.0012354595,0.000085805405,0.0006580111,0.00009806456,0.58535427],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93398887,0.0069304374,0.00083979336,0.02207492,0.0004090512,0.000017714096,0.0002497241,0.000036971876,0.035452623],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9826135,0.0012333287,0.00046118812,0.0012983744,0.008671657,0.005721975],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96779454,0.0088881785,0.0015141479,0.00092176883,0.015714826,0.005166569],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009518209,0.00031231644,0.00059257296,0.0047799246,0.023076236,0.016036047,0.0022169119,0.008383025,0.01639574],"category_scores_gemma":[0.041669805,0.0003739767,0.00071197393,0.007253319,0.0082640555,0.004483304,0.006035885,0.00597638,0.00083830534],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016284271,0.000127894,0.034426324,0.00020740449,0.00009117172,0.0016277191,0.015389394,0.0008866824,0.001010048,0.58663934,0.22378814,0.13564311],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011870067,0.000116429874,0.15696925,0.001254361,0.00026799654,0.0007248249,0.040876035,0.0021166343,0.0016022222,0.060849935,0.73487884,0.00022479461],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.94899124,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9862206,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07787538,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07787538,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1288471,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5650281},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2165049268","doi":"10.5539/jpl.v3n1p45","title":"Access to Collective Litigations in China: A Tough Work","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Politics and Law","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Renmin University of China","keywords":"Plaintiff; China; Mediation; Political science; Supreme court; Legislation; Law; Collective bargaining; Law and economics; Business; Sociology","score_opus":0.0204089358417017,"score_gpt":0.336845850808468,"score_spread":0.3164369149667663,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2165049268","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90422493,0.0032688552,0.0013218137,0.032078095,0.0001231237,0.000065311106,0.000062468454,0.000034467117,0.058820907],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9923327,0.000491143,0.00014825571,0.0012121918,0.00008310168,0.000016596545,0.00001601218,0.000003051441,0.005697003],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9950471,0.0007339342,0.00021046588,0.00057492236,0.0015192614,0.0019144204],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99615365,0.0010199288,0.00078006764,0.00034362593,0.00038305242,0.0013196014],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0050684987,0.00019430502,0.00049161946,0.0022834134,0.009703155,0.006125161,0.0011503657,0.0023692134,0.0077502145],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0050329296,0.0003152469,0.00041115162,0.0020008704,0.0065415213,0.0039093457,0.0058248537,0.0018638382,0.00016547185],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014107583,0.00032301695,0.15890989,0.00037910216,0.0000978178,0.005180712,0.057973515,0.0010707502,0.0033358973,0.6258269,0.019346204,0.12741515],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015496985,0.00033864833,0.5006911,0.00068178744,0.00013001174,0.0020593205,0.05917707,0.0060059605,0.0024462114,0.19160709,0.23646742,0.00024035918],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.051580504,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.079573825,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.051580504,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0078682825,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014125814,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10256052},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2167094518","doi":"10.1017/s0020589309001201","title":"ARTICLE 23 OF THE BRUSSELS I REGULATION: A COMPREHENSIVE CODE FOR JURISDICTION AGREEMENTS?","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International and Comparative Law Quarterly","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":248,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trinity College","funders":"","keywords":"Formality; Jurisdiction; Code (set theory); Relation (database); Law and economics; Exclusive jurisdiction; Political science; Law; Business; Computer science; Sociology; Programming language; Data mining","score_opus":0.052260574153025874,"score_gpt":0.3436548449102697,"score_spread":0.29139427075724383,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2167094518","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07730599,0.0046572946,0.045037568,0.0841436,0.0029825964,0.00059153116,0.0006972639,0.00040278144,0.7841813],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8959472,0.0011581857,0.022279337,0.02554081,0.00095103175,0.00093602313,0.00027910597,0.00010936088,0.052798934],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98125964,0.005676685,0.0020838762,0.0015378857,0.0061032115,0.0033386804],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9812246,0.011097924,0.0021027918,0.0015906094,0.0031913926,0.0007926715],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012154175,0.00037844066,0.0009498251,0.0017179742,0.0058877603,0.011791604,0.0019233869,0.010501268,0.0054143006],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02868024,0.00067152927,0.0009326409,0.0016019423,0.01330119,0.0032958009,0.0037446537,0.0070677195,0.0013225129],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017723996,0.000016899505,0.00037797022,0.00003425048,0.000006201378,0.00012436963,0.0013761724,0.00036675573,0.00033703094,0.9800214,0.013607844,0.0037133435],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012784459,0.00016984403,0.006617049,0.0015475474,0.000075703596,0.00052733655,0.0036452126,0.002538948,0.002809171,0.5587339,0.42289326,0.00031427023],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.034575623,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.034561444,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.034575623,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00824533,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020420475,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06874871},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2170496276","doi":"10.1002/iir.1215","title":"UK Cross‐Border Cooperation: Extending Rescue to Jersey Debtors on a ‘Passporting’ Basis","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Insolvency Review","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Scope (computer science); Insolvency; Law and economics; Law; Business; Computer science; Political science; Economics","score_opus":0.03722315612111433,"score_gpt":0.43447054059867096,"score_spread":0.39724738447755664,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2170496276","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14904416,0.28566206,0.0030657547,0.053504262,0.0025185691,0.00037052744,0.00041548465,0.00010504637,0.5053142],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8554248,0.089264035,0.0025622586,0.009286388,0.00039978768,0.0001825792,0.0005442559,0.000027410435,0.042308427],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.996042,0.0016450066,0.00028496404,0.00023192061,0.00078373303,0.0010123579],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99388325,0.0027278312,0.0009341201,0.00034293853,0.0016208016,0.00049108075],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006572314,0.00021940355,0.00031054686,0.0012998929,0.0017720745,0.0037739181,0.0010652031,0.0019548733,0.0149475485],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012123481,0.00020065316,0.00027120116,0.0013017767,0.0018968576,0.0025096745,0.0040089353,0.0017664437,0.0011786399],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005023709,0.00026463557,0.009692488,0.005984712,0.00015327745,0.0014462147,0.009899801,0.0020647629,0.00093485136,0.15840387,0.17195578,0.63869727],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016073904,0.0006584451,0.046460416,0.011419224,0.00021688899,0.000892303,0.018238394,0.00081810355,0.00084486866,0.006499965,0.91372883,0.00006187115],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06333366,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12414615,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06333366,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033690438,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010631179,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12593001},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2186923397","doi":"","title":"Global Outlook on the Electronic Communications Convention)) Prospects for Canadian Implementation of the UNCITRAL Electronic Communications Convention","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Convention; Treaty; Law; Political science; Scope (computer science); Legislation; Politics; Computer science","score_opus":0.04158720581671024,"score_gpt":0.366888553569753,"score_spread":0.32530134775304276,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2186923397","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.024115529,0.023282874,0.0021519305,0.34190643,0.0039484454,0.00012016225,0.0027312103,0.00032705566,0.60141647],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.42746264,0.048362076,0.01610417,0.10253835,0.0014056081,0.00014335602,0.004348277,0.00016237295,0.39947307],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99290895,0.0005624095,0.00011944622,0.00026052058,0.0034438325,0.0027049182],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99346924,0.00050194375,0.00027128312,0.00013476536,0.0043751197,0.0012476345],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005569362,0.0005097383,0.00022044216,0.0022975905,0.00681457,0.008676925,0.001424325,0.0046361987,0.02824617],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0068815122,0.00021451576,0.0007454459,0.0028305412,0.0025369895,0.0023842924,0.0021359222,0.0030865415,0.0017748778],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000074692754,0.00008474605,0.0047733686,0.00038381622,0.000022614413,0.00036140232,0.0012332224,0.0013697186,0.0011634866,0.48535702,0.3900216,0.115154296],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012935465,0.000026284943,0.008595419,0.00019304221,0.000011712081,0.000055179866,0.0015842977,0.00040701925,0.0003061483,0.0061938153,0.9825654,0.000048680413],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96265286,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9731102,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.049537737,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.049537737,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.20696354,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3594231},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W219396504","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.720223","title":"Constitutional Authority Over Copyrights and Private Copying","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Copying; Law; Business; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.011674184486573631,"score_gpt":0.2957284341580446,"score_spread":0.28405424967147097,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W219396504","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20789714,0.0020573817,0.01869988,0.039009523,0.00034895225,0.00014933253,0.00027853422,0.00008191062,0.7314773],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9901724,0.00024515035,0.0009145748,0.001077301,0.00017786067,0.000058760164,0.00002980235,0.0000141238925,0.007309966],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97938615,0.008338729,0.0014753036,0.0023483282,0.0046492913,0.00380215],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9174113,0.06356998,0.004952922,0.0070089116,0.004643079,0.0024138405],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.023197604,0.00033106457,0.0009641162,0.0029435377,0.009621581,0.017088817,0.0021760385,0.009020889,0.01111666],"category_scores_gemma":[0.087501235,0.00071609725,0.0007207941,0.0030673572,0.034029692,0.011720987,0.0056989887,0.008648368,0.0007071671],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012253017,0.000014007886,0.00026711557,0.000007941197,0.0000035936614,0.000028462777,0.00089773326,0.000118975426,0.000074177864,0.99643195,0.0006923939,0.0014513733],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000044652377,0.000015149194,0.00089270313,0.000053498654,0.000018511471,0.000057148038,0.0009142309,0.00064617884,0.00037875984,0.98568165,0.011278209,0.000019315561],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01105252,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012983195,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023197604,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007007149,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010868505,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.122682154},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2194967447","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.2811","title":"Book Note: Fault Lines of Globalization: Legal Order and the Politics of A-Legality, by Hans Lindhal","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Principle of legality; Politics; Order (exchange); Political science; Globalization; Law; Fault (geology); Law and economics; Sociology; Economics; Geology; Paleontology","score_opus":0.018844290381754867,"score_gpt":0.30893007401613154,"score_spread":0.29008578363437665,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2194967447","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0010518954,0.12398212,0.0019020564,0.6898539,0.026287382,0.000025799742,0.00041639825,0.00007498976,0.15640545],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.04086036,0.09082215,0.0027283642,0.19126508,0.0548465,0.00013057345,0.0003218188,0.0002597107,0.61876553],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996233,0.00012847832,0.000016354263,0.00007705315,0.00012368431,0.000031130738],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978052,0.0017461743,0.0000659141,0.000049757942,0.00023634636,0.00009666843],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00086712954,0.00055744074,0.0004787427,0.0009833055,0.0030372401,0.0051743817,0.0009668952,0.004586101,0.015524834],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029360207,0.00039032765,0.00029659888,0.0017334875,0.004777092,0.007086873,0.0013306685,0.0065661776,0.0046057426],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000055611386,0.000008936954,0.000071429145,0.000033292232,0.0000023416808,0.000018480327,0.00041138267,0.000082788574,0.000028581293,0.124099754,0.87023973,0.004997644],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010300441,0.000005333783,0.00036030842,0.00020493635,0.0000045177135,0.000041491578,0.0007303093,0.00015860633,0.000058548736,0.11034801,0.8880608,0.000016954527],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02514072,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05274221,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02514072,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029070375,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031707364,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.051935732},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2196910315","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511778278.020","title":"Plate section","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Section (typography); Geology; Computer science; Operating system","score_opus":0.0140318607432354,"score_gpt":0.2972574624565435,"score_spread":0.2832256017133081,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2196910315","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00046678845,0.0008691816,0.0036927098,0.0023143431,0.00873083,0.00055928755,0.05818084,0.0058052917,0.9193807],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0014693646,0.000834401,0.0018982751,0.0010806281,0.0007772523,0.00021092607,0.03394718,0.0024837432,0.9572982],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990119,0.00008350686,0.00006463959,0.0001378297,0.0005973988,0.00010477063],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99634784,0.0005721494,0.00014414113,0.00054770516,0.0019699417,0.0004181344],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013193998,0.0012200576,0.0010777931,0.0040722103,0.0019817746,0.0029775158,0.0022030638,0.0016618771,0.9205951],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0068851598,0.0006148132,0.00093748386,0.0025774695,0.0007096579,0.002539759,0.0020009542,0.0016482397,0.8322003],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004087368,0.000017973935,0.00007001728,0.00024661835,0.0000018364822,0.00004205797,0.000033477027,0.00004449491,0.0006147329,0.0031007126,0.9732998,0.022487508],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004514762,0.000008639,0.00018588935,0.000063991865,0.0000017421901,0.00004042426,0.000033920085,0.00001523,0.00025762912,0.00049202633,0.9988914,0.000004599704],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007101833,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009820017,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9205951,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001406485,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002534628,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11326146},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2201366296","doi":"","title":"Not Merely Facts: Trade Usages in German Contract Law","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Norm (philosophy); Law; Political science; German; Context (archaeology); Arbitration; Legislature; Law and economics; Sociology; History; Linguistics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.01618352066453366,"score_gpt":0.3026983830871364,"score_spread":0.28651486242260277,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2201366296","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3086656,0.020375745,0.030565647,0.017312927,0.0002924978,0.00004000076,0.00032706786,0.0000927529,0.6223278],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9890805,0.0022422872,0.0011112858,0.0007221317,0.00007817288,0.000012376675,0.00005816039,0.00003131548,0.006663866],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973622,0.0012165221,0.00015411437,0.00032147745,0.0005534101,0.00039221995],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99813676,0.0011583263,0.000213155,0.0002676517,0.00015956536,0.000064607615],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028106235,0.00027334352,0.00023316186,0.0024148512,0.0034589828,0.006796025,0.0006055217,0.0023871604,0.0026175193],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033531445,0.00039017477,0.00024599794,0.003840002,0.023331208,0.012143771,0.003019752,0.0025311548,0.00044021057],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004560241,0.0000019752708,0.00031811427,0.000013800435,0.0000015176896,0.00007963968,0.009837538,0.00009389953,0.00008701473,0.98532563,0.00071439665,0.0035218822],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001279864,0.000023123905,0.005841436,0.00035397,0.000019093446,0.0006045477,0.022394424,0.0012787709,0.00061978865,0.67383707,0.29496834,0.000046579626],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010176884,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010476295,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010176884,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00669927,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014979645,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.048606813},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2202062549","doi":"","title":"Lost in Transition: Answering the Questions Raised by the Supreme Court of Canada's New Approach to Jurisdiction","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Jurisdiction; Connection (principal bundle); Law; Political science; Original jurisdiction; Service (business); Set (abstract data type); Business; Engineering; Computer science","score_opus":0.008238839868952278,"score_gpt":0.24013447202234744,"score_spread":0.23189563215339518,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2202062549","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14690684,0.015123117,0.0057388637,0.5448283,0.0018791123,0.00009608928,0.00061465765,0.000081978156,0.28473103],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.927678,0.0031963475,0.0016068905,0.048748318,0.0003892651,0.00003333489,0.00012286803,0.000048926322,0.01817611],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98482865,0.0015822253,0.00036633972,0.0016683771,0.0058187763,0.005735769],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9876623,0.0042197797,0.00047821773,0.0005265313,0.004910689,0.002202545],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009008518,0.00036648996,0.00082356506,0.0024781958,0.033886537,0.020517088,0.004976921,0.009820257,0.0038123166],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022425713,0.00052862626,0.00079981715,0.0041162698,0.03896041,0.00749754,0.0057585426,0.019580929,0.00027710473],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023346418,0.000011265175,0.002428249,0.000040270494,0.000017849621,0.00045152867,0.015331096,0.00049178436,0.00015284542,0.9438733,0.028623166,0.00855524],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008886616,0.000031472136,0.015247396,0.0010415652,0.00013534326,0.00034645793,0.06968822,0.0032072507,0.0007481828,0.38927332,0.51988155,0.0003104797],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99162924,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99561536,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21003674,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.21003674,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2660506,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9162454},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2203970239","doi":"10.2307/2586231","title":"The Common Law Mind: Medieval and Early Modern Conceptions. By J. W. Tubbs. Baltimore and London: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2000. 253p. $42.50.","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Political Science Review","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Content (measure theory); Law and economics; Sociology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.013905505361678217,"score_gpt":0.29971205071297474,"score_spread":0.2858065453512965,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2203970239","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0021194532,0.8625543,0.0014893262,0.07829913,0.0012488256,0.000008124577,0.00010270815,0.000026980893,0.054151174],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.23458849,0.6915632,0.002527912,0.011942122,0.0047454434,0.00007440284,0.00020535271,0.00009864618,0.054254394],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994006,0.00028313493,0.00003398804,0.0000733416,0.00014364121,0.0000652137],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99849355,0.0009415454,0.00017420645,0.000086434324,0.00016826652,0.00013585867],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015511948,0.0007409207,0.0004951065,0.0030098981,0.00227264,0.0038245707,0.0009912045,0.0027605756,0.009625157],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004598855,0.0008493703,0.00026541826,0.0033246882,0.014446194,0.012165883,0.0016952318,0.0034759603,0.0018286451],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007072095,0.000041281073,0.000888286,0.0005757328,0.000032237538,0.00018492744,0.010891014,0.00030121897,0.00013294251,0.595227,0.28449437,0.10716019],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012956058,0.000015970516,0.0041616457,0.0013758233,0.000015453106,0.00030310487,0.0028984058,0.0001350669,0.00007095614,0.5418578,0.44913575,0.000017028144],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013645265,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024101788,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013645265,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004289517,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020933005,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.032199383},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2209862075","doi":"10.1017/s0069005800007542","title":"The Internet in Light of Traditional Public and Private International Law Principles and Rules Applied in Canada","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Yearbook of international Law/Annuaire canadien de droit international","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Law; The Internet; Political science; Context (archaeology); Conflict of laws; International law; Choice of law; Adjudication; Convention; Common law; Legal aspects of computing; Constitution; Geography","score_opus":0.016943304210711056,"score_gpt":0.2086740138354284,"score_spread":0.19173070962471736,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2209862075","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04168552,0.0075243227,0.0030498947,0.06112589,0.00069143594,0.00015481332,0.0008949664,0.00012596874,0.884747],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7102077,0.0108072525,0.0070735174,0.011477462,0.00022361265,0.000098544835,0.00051480834,0.000103318336,0.2594939],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961719,0.00031000233,0.00014587761,0.00024857913,0.0019168056,0.0012069605],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99699867,0.00052369124,0.0001235676,0.00011958665,0.0017101148,0.00052428734],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013352165,0.00023226968,0.00024439424,0.002578101,0.011704411,0.010960048,0.0011962753,0.0017736069,0.005778868],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00490846,0.00027063393,0.00034499477,0.004060224,0.007128921,0.0016231432,0.0019180585,0.003054491,0.00035217564],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009950902,0.000017653429,0.0027296247,0.000052866002,0.000007060109,0.00036544117,0.0044347486,0.0013323425,0.00019604,0.9177791,0.051157393,0.021917924],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015006843,0.0000120333625,0.011867322,0.00023229768,0.000030385047,0.00012626869,0.008260462,0.0018945604,0.00044467393,0.047551308,0.9294785,0.00008718943],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99614596,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99715173,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11813311,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11813311,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.20963235,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.85711974},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2215097367","doi":"10.1017/s0069005800007566","title":"In the Name of the International: The Supreme Court of Canada and the Internationalist Transformation of Canadian Private International Law","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Yearbook of international Law/Annuaire canadien de droit international","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Internationalization; Globalization; Political science; Politics; International law; Law; Conflict of laws; Supreme court; Political economy; Sociology; Economics; International trade","score_opus":0.009493910066858615,"score_gpt":0.2176118620159596,"score_spread":0.208117951949101,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2215097367","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08940876,0.012050945,0.0021135649,0.17964679,0.0008414645,0.00006414116,0.00045758966,0.00009195949,0.7153247],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9279999,0.0032974894,0.00079717627,0.011507975,0.00022656334,0.00002428004,0.000111481735,0.000045675893,0.05598936],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9940369,0.0004966038,0.00007721849,0.00040061073,0.002579015,0.0024095997],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958759,0.0010404647,0.00019464151,0.00016317701,0.001980897,0.00074488163],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002250319,0.0003081018,0.00035826705,0.0023016054,0.030405624,0.015558065,0.0018425408,0.00445303,0.005916737],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009396916,0.00033227436,0.000343381,0.00305442,0.020943562,0.0026869744,0.0030325325,0.0063733105,0.00021955695],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012484457,0.000009989242,0.0010708479,0.000026200196,0.000007882819,0.00022068489,0.009469638,0.0004951789,0.00014750863,0.938157,0.04266433,0.007718275],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026101976,0.000013784714,0.013549788,0.00034594754,0.000061501814,0.00016219617,0.033190053,0.0017782076,0.00075822196,0.13864788,0.8112901,0.00017617784],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9943287,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.996378,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18427198,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.18427198,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.15885821,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9461289},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2216016638","doi":"10.7202/1100776ar","title":"La pratique judiciaire du droit international privé au Québec en 1995-1996","year":2023,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue québécoise de droit international","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.012476219094110117,"score_gpt":0.278332671971412,"score_spread":0.26585645287730186,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2216016638","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.35272396,0.05807788,0.004117767,0.13589258,0.0018941321,0.0002262094,0.0041870964,0.00014607281,0.44273424],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.68074864,0.0068143704,0.0011182283,0.006561023,0.000114242925,0.00008865714,0.0006467268,0.000043369993,0.30386475],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977863,0.0002475392,0.00005848589,0.00020995259,0.0008984992,0.0007991432],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961429,0.0006793197,0.00030898067,0.00007902504,0.0020561705,0.0007335824],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018522243,0.00025707972,0.00026024028,0.0009375317,0.008112694,0.0042776642,0.0009063269,0.002043814,0.008329584],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007066114,0.00025175454,0.00019141963,0.002092909,0.0025790636,0.00119989,0.0010323894,0.0036935234,0.00042541878],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022812895,0.00010433349,0.056706563,0.0002688893,0.00007016045,0.0011873945,0.039624266,0.0023906524,0.0013625594,0.39440635,0.3954634,0.10818734],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000335539,0.00004202105,0.10930749,0.00032551392,0.000033176715,0.00016628018,0.0110651245,0.0009384573,0.0007465769,0.0025278383,0.87474066,0.00007337203],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99473816,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9972037,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.112749316,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.112749316,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.10191095,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.81805736},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2217891573","doi":"","title":"CORELAREA NORMELOR JURIDICE ÎN SISTEMUL DE DREPT AL STATELOR UNITE ALE AMERICII","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.2967331681979392,"score_gpt":0.5740858709116878,"score_spread":0.2773527027137486,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2217891573","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24721424,0.020405034,0.0052392706,0.024544284,0.0023150963,0.00018844104,0.0016133819,0.00039449823,0.69808567],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6763182,0.004191061,0.0029565035,0.001678388,0.0008273319,0.00008430122,0.00066812837,0.000086519394,0.3131894],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986349,0.0002639355,0.00010481963,0.00019502429,0.0005431479,0.00025827007],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99848676,0.0004591619,0.00026506267,0.00010441003,0.00039824558,0.00028626126],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017043062,0.00019112763,0.0002986359,0.001135754,0.0035656556,0.0035399091,0.00050908275,0.0009160025,0.018944453],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0034241162,0.00017841891,0.0001667914,0.0015095867,0.0013687811,0.001116313,0.0018525295,0.0022080129,0.0027068148],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00025582674,0.00022151091,0.04055298,0.00061936444,0.000028767914,0.0018290499,0.015379454,0.0005651836,0.002206952,0.53732073,0.10732635,0.29369384],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000219518,0.000059306727,0.031549342,0.00017162149,0.000009674395,0.00048483306,0.0019896065,0.00022907353,0.0007264476,0.0075620343,0.95717645,0.000019568924],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020345053,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.041751057,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020345053,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036316966,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005494056,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06337547},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2218501108","doi":"","title":"Waiting in a New Line at City Hall: Registered Partnerships As an Option for Relationship Recognition in Canada","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"General partnership; Relevance (law); State (computer science); Value (mathematics); Nova scotia; Political science; Politics; Obstacle; Public administration; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.22269721522823016,"score_gpt":0.33258836531208524,"score_spread":0.10989115008385508,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2218501108","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.59932244,0.0019124125,0.0031786817,0.07186339,0.00044091677,0.00019794723,0.000116742885,0.00008220329,0.32288527],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97472626,0.0005137144,0.0009849381,0.0022968526,0.000013092671,0.000023482968,0.000024677625,0.00001262509,0.021404307],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99549496,0.0011630818,0.00007479784,0.00024876866,0.000814512,0.0022038117],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9945503,0.0013198877,0.00037809735,0.00022041293,0.0007278758,0.002803546],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027794589,0.000126641,0.00022934616,0.00047422326,0.023712454,0.009570891,0.0018829331,0.0029853797,0.006848223],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007866042,0.0003269668,0.00027706038,0.0012356638,0.008393791,0.003319221,0.005122579,0.0038515471,0.0003204956],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017586006,0.00024482646,0.026823023,0.00012779215,0.000013687762,0.0016908789,0.09466042,0.0010771871,0.0009257629,0.7238701,0.047384363,0.103006],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001492213,0.00026939285,0.0594023,0.00040570606,0.00006698821,0.00088575657,0.4148101,0.0060205683,0.001324177,0.03176438,0.48462775,0.0002736686],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95966595,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9902244,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05377084,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05377084,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13916498,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3901366},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2219907631","doi":"","title":"Intellectual Property and Private International Law: Comparative Perspectives","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Intellectual property; Political science; Enforcement; Jurisdiction; Legislature; Law; Conflict of laws; Context (archaeology); Comparative law; Public administration; Geography","score_opus":0.028384559942387342,"score_gpt":0.3171008365089493,"score_spread":0.28871627656656196,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2219907631","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010991698,0.245821,0.0039238012,0.04181255,0.001216216,0.000018544963,0.00010316418,0.000018141283,0.6960948],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.71535784,0.24110238,0.0029334852,0.009453417,0.005527922,0.00017269567,0.00019454824,0.000064866756,0.025192749],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99389607,0.0039563472,0.00011895558,0.00026698774,0.0010288794,0.0007327114],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99090403,0.0076790797,0.00034972662,0.00022119303,0.00052862946,0.0003172922],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0059615322,0.00067137537,0.00088142435,0.011197771,0.0063956524,0.02154589,0.0013926778,0.007200156,0.011833639],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006239733,0.00049374125,0.0006510873,0.014123011,0.028443707,0.020688917,0.0057776766,0.005354228,0.0008286463],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000043627533,0.000009805753,0.0000657103,0.000077341014,0.000002595502,0.000052061798,0.0017465508,0.00005439716,0.000012110244,0.9917355,0.002789116,0.003450472],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018129253,0.000040593524,0.0013786564,0.0012698725,0.000015743157,0.00033949598,0.022147108,0.0004406581,0.00008249376,0.62694544,0.3473064,0.000015352032],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0057252035,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007152006,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02154589,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013761898,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029409414,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09985006},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2222492351","doi":"","title":"ALI Family Law Report","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Family law; Law; Business; Political science","score_opus":0.011305844176247677,"score_gpt":0.28829336029107067,"score_spread":0.276987516114823,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2222492351","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0010356683,0.003326837,0.0007591849,0.019816916,0.0048219445,0.00032003765,0.0035153267,0.0003733592,0.9660307],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.005097382,0.002147342,0.0006279086,0.0068783783,0.00080390094,0.00030051015,0.0022223825,0.00010520024,0.981817],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963792,0.0004360455,0.0002045174,0.00049289095,0.0018911089,0.0005962656],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99658394,0.00054721226,0.00014816463,0.0004023589,0.0017884402,0.0005298131],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038450598,0.00073097623,0.0006469042,0.003152302,0.006521946,0.005213793,0.0024644178,0.005528407,0.34476635],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008697445,0.0005573778,0.0007894645,0.0019896254,0.000851476,0.0031397494,0.0034543378,0.0053387797,0.13272876],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016107047,0.00005457406,0.00037468426,0.000049888153,0.0000030597116,0.0001342334,0.00018663623,0.000027516218,0.00008555185,0.033366524,0.9190524,0.046648696],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000029895293,0.00000638211,0.00057970866,0.00006695692,0.0000015202083,0.000054367672,0.00010272989,0.000020193405,0.000049936516,0.00096408674,0.9981464,0.0000047233984],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.031550065,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.034941502,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.34476635,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005824779,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012339685,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.93461126},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2224330119","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1022","title":"Independent Child Legal Representation: A Concept in the Making","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Representation (politics); Political science; Computer science; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.032219969325136384,"score_gpt":0.37999114699862024,"score_spread":0.34777117767348387,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2224330119","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.051972833,0.008925039,0.09143082,0.27734157,0.002405951,0.00020342112,0.00013736231,0.00007537896,0.5675076],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96899647,0.0014755792,0.009157109,0.0072528007,0.0011833026,0.00027502523,0.000038065253,0.000043861204,0.011577742],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9734629,0.01747996,0.00083001505,0.0022836202,0.0038447715,0.002098895],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97257745,0.019576143,0.0018555326,0.0017878466,0.0018914927,0.0023116162],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.033512622,0.0006003129,0.0011424185,0.0048070145,0.015432042,0.025025055,0.0055044563,0.01753383,0.0062054168],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04894835,0.00067803054,0.00095143047,0.0040595727,0.11662178,0.02462402,0.012307873,0.015567556,0.00035015424],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000015214003,0.0000040488308,0.000052157437,0.0000033243434,7.1520174e-7,0.000011704903,0.001517315,0.000032061358,0.0000066755274,0.9971131,0.0005053366,0.000752106],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008416883,0.000012287485,0.00022278968,0.00013568805,0.0000071231866,0.00008738917,0.0051278584,0.00044826986,0.000072272465,0.96631527,0.02754474,0.000017857037],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005870587,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005415939,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.033512622,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010151961,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016870163,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17723382},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2229064158","doi":"","title":"Enforcement of Non-Monetary Foreign Judgments in Australia","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"ANU Open Research (Australian National University)","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Enforcement; Law; Political science; Business","score_opus":0.2871291089835885,"score_gpt":0.44008430814232213,"score_spread":0.15295519915873362,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2229064158","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.76718533,0.0015834289,0.005514646,0.024527596,0.00029086912,0.00018081619,0.000040791474,0.000042324697,0.20063417],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9801165,0.00042524154,0.0011045758,0.0027559253,0.000036185815,0.000032657194,0.000009813616,0.000008352618,0.015510741],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9838604,0.005533428,0.0011354988,0.0016190581,0.0045169885,0.003334588],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98326164,0.0059847375,0.003120662,0.0012337773,0.004638992,0.0017601625],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011953488,0.00018563594,0.00047153156,0.0013796036,0.011273448,0.005778104,0.0016014285,0.0034786158,0.0028320341],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03642353,0.00065596733,0.00037307222,0.0010274359,0.0069690146,0.0026033067,0.0054810755,0.0065790047,0.00027082107],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015185129,0.00044381234,0.06561024,0.0002916205,0.00014633522,0.0069392757,0.108955264,0.0030188665,0.004764119,0.69596034,0.016597593,0.09712069],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016914288,0.000608253,0.29004604,0.0014156016,0.00032627466,0.0029592435,0.052758787,0.022116773,0.0071927826,0.22910304,0.39275125,0.0005528903],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.34216082,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.42044872,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.34216082,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014603444,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.026051236,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.68033844},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2230079045","doi":"","title":"GLOBAL REACH, LOCAL GRASP: CONSTRUCTING EXTRATERRITORIAL JURISDICTION IN THE AGE OF GLOBALIZATION","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa; Dalhousie University","funders":"Dalhousie University","keywords":"Globalization; Jurisdiction; Political science; Law; Opposition (politics); Legislature; Politics","score_opus":0.015959254558613883,"score_gpt":0.2963842333416712,"score_spread":0.2804249787830573,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2230079045","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18960008,0.0034806943,0.025581896,0.016886625,0.000111494424,0.000040984756,0.00004975637,0.000069560556,0.7641789],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9918749,0.00035293942,0.0011304684,0.00045686407,0.000013520205,0.000012833529,0.000009239679,0.00001811109,0.0061312816],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99666375,0.0013567881,0.00006426406,0.00038488212,0.00058008375,0.00095022476],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977549,0.00086526945,0.00019663946,0.00023296283,0.00046591836,0.00048439714],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0043556606,0.00024337877,0.0003464679,0.0021597422,0.011116633,0.009064541,0.0010945909,0.002153624,0.0058707795],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0060202368,0.00023364744,0.00032464194,0.0016112308,0.052981775,0.011348304,0.011312788,0.0032449486,0.00028299727],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000037343018,0.0000021857195,0.00076858635,0.000008409218,0.0000020815703,0.00012655018,0.03694295,0.00012049699,0.000046980076,0.957545,0.000583672,0.0038493567],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009351638,0.000023629555,0.004182176,0.00022303853,0.000024425737,0.00028325804,0.12922005,0.0006983498,0.00023456168,0.72082204,0.1442438,0.000035441255],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12292661,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.20218097,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12292661,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015054262,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014822412,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24442214},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2233782463","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511815300.006","title":"Law and society","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Arbitration; Law; Ruler; Political science; Politics; Mediation; State (computer science); Morality; Sharia; Legislature; Islam; Sociology; Law and economics; History","score_opus":0.026744327006529647,"score_gpt":0.22776801724830165,"score_spread":0.201023690241772,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2233782463","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009043664,0.02654996,0.0043311827,0.062303733,0.0012989255,0.00007460542,0.00021612844,0.00008365233,0.8960981],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.778112,0.020844458,0.005548945,0.034512382,0.003040575,0.0003132609,0.00035610495,0.000119859316,0.15715241],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99577785,0.0019517839,0.00020618494,0.00084937614,0.0006477112,0.0005671052],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99756753,0.00091538916,0.00028900604,0.00051576004,0.00033446855,0.00037782316],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003156565,0.00058602984,0.0007244719,0.0014935682,0.007938441,0.013570502,0.00088986335,0.0047726645,0.014374538],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0037175417,0.00027890655,0.0003127884,0.0015713666,0.04592779,0.007105418,0.006573918,0.004782039,0.0030002336],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000030585197,0.0000075769008,0.00022077141,0.000025893223,0.000004666533,0.0000312225,0.0023050082,0.00007082133,0.000051296855,0.98152936,0.009431531,0.0063187927],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009224894,0.000018727136,0.000580429,0.00021537406,0.000005257605,0.000089620786,0.0020998744,0.00006207602,0.0000426423,0.53768,0.45918503,0.000011780437],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00933216,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007406922,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014374538,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0064376085,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0075274264,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.048087597},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2236363435","doi":"","title":"Introduction to a Special Issue of the Canada-United States Law Journal","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canada-United States law journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.01465744482680575,"score_gpt":0.23982699149073372,"score_spread":0.22516954666392797,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2236363435","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00075657363,0.04764957,0.00054040673,0.25581142,0.59780747,0.0001889932,0.0012440728,0.00028168515,0.0957198],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0066402415,0.030327406,0.000645912,0.13407624,0.6078849,0.00018384142,0.00096013764,0.00045136327,0.21882993],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964768,0.0002930336,0.00023910432,0.0002919914,0.0021469158,0.00055212],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9856678,0.0035764899,0.00061396894,0.0006986655,0.006726854,0.0027163075],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033652177,0.0020853004,0.0021225137,0.012095217,0.01092548,0.0136767365,0.002840826,0.0134369815,0.056728262],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011296922,0.000977921,0.0018120368,0.0066875685,0.004101121,0.0059808516,0.0034308524,0.010244027,0.014187878],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004054627,0.000012263219,0.00006485485,0.000029215653,0.0000020947145,0.000030304873,0.000020623464,0.000010831648,0.000021984191,0.00099816,0.9957163,0.0030893835],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000057979273,0.0000072166213,0.0013044603,0.00018853766,0.000008371363,0.000057032805,0.00013398551,0.00005836921,0.00002458128,0.0009982185,0.9971974,0.000016095004],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.19262333,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.47047722,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8073767,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015425204,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02095203,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38300425},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2237946526","doi":"10.7202/1069366ar","title":"GIBRAN VAN ERT, USING INTERNATIONAL LAW IN CANADIAN COURTS (THE HAGUE; LONDON; NEW YORK: KLUWER LAW INTERNATIONAL, 2002)","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue québécoise de droit international","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; International law; Political science; Conflict of laws","score_opus":0.027526974196285036,"score_gpt":0.28510144039416185,"score_spread":0.25757446619787683,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2237946526","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0012138182,0.6626146,0.0019573066,0.11886467,0.0037124401,0.000120946235,0.0011961211,0.0001375833,0.21018255],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.08369178,0.520256,0.006248568,0.09724715,0.0035458517,0.0003532639,0.0012530719,0.00044281041,0.28696153],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9954513,0.00093594496,0.0002698181,0.00035481073,0.00222333,0.000764832],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974988,0.0011175695,0.00022606248,0.00007736912,0.00086201716,0.00021822474],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0034955651,0.0015522165,0.00069999165,0.004566558,0.011572306,0.012084156,0.0033450841,0.013117777,0.020424584],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007368507,0.0012890176,0.00070079026,0.009677293,0.008328367,0.011935058,0.002410623,0.0072870906,0.0048427666],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019152321,0.000018408158,0.0002821828,0.00017657975,0.000009856993,0.00017324417,0.002970694,0.00012230226,0.00006174049,0.11332802,0.86286414,0.019973738],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001817522,0.0000073306896,0.0030920114,0.00078759453,0.000017303812,0.00011469655,0.0023335132,0.00009468519,0.00012428721,0.029645028,0.96370006,0.00006528927],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8603614,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.95080197,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1396386,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.032275982,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.030134017,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28092188},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2240531620","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511809217.014","title":"Plate section","year":2007,"lang":"es","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Section (typography); Computer science; Content (measure theory); Database; Operating system; Mathematics","score_opus":0.019703540048153903,"score_gpt":0.31395013504859465,"score_spread":0.29424659500044076,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2240531620","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0005417977,0.0011634034,0.0043393867,0.0028333524,0.010847841,0.0006240822,0.066418886,0.0068022152,0.9064291],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0016643301,0.0010944087,0.0021684982,0.001326119,0.00096742646,0.00023646498,0.040260587,0.0027251744,0.9495571],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989831,0.000085579646,0.00006883355,0.00014541048,0.0006095846,0.000107438325],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961358,0.0006180945,0.00015801874,0.00057685096,0.002070607,0.00044063575],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013643275,0.001253042,0.0011234445,0.0042520845,0.0019788144,0.0030096106,0.0022933248,0.0017120945,0.9206963],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0070565585,0.0006371915,0.0009876258,0.0026125656,0.0007118118,0.0025135812,0.0020149988,0.001673311,0.8308768],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000045966637,0.000019357854,0.00007520974,0.0002744418,0.0000020982504,0.00004610753,0.00003242928,0.00004774257,0.00069725036,0.0030013304,0.97159225,0.024165865],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000479403,0.000009743087,0.00019288692,0.00006859496,0.00000195942,0.00004413156,0.000033446777,0.000015919226,0.00028400982,0.0005077252,0.9988318,0.0000049211917],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0065777833,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008822848,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07930368,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014001302,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024812627,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1131171},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2241435909","doi":"","title":"Addressing Aboriginal disputes in Canada : a new initiative","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology)","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Geography; Environmental planning","score_opus":0.037766488863968065,"score_gpt":0.3220813184965003,"score_spread":0.28431482963253224,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2241435909","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18831806,0.030761674,0.006761812,0.4149227,0.0016133285,0.0007508487,0.00074120273,0.00018008194,0.35595027],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8114416,0.027483488,0.016592303,0.024639651,0.00046020176,0.00034122358,0.00054786954,0.00010070393,0.11839279],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966529,0.00069023506,0.000059641083,0.00015760398,0.0010844966,0.0013551948],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9947706,0.00077195896,0.00015986204,0.00013578549,0.0022670245,0.0018947866],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035212059,0.00037364117,0.0004300224,0.0017841009,0.026940254,0.008035947,0.0024979215,0.003053575,0.0073515936],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0056466134,0.00023030331,0.00041169225,0.0028631059,0.006013002,0.002869338,0.004585966,0.0037782178,0.0003676921],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001232109,0.00032889206,0.023916736,0.0008811833,0.000070519774,0.0014687194,0.09536157,0.0022442653,0.0014998529,0.21700896,0.23960045,0.4174957],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000051104493,0.00008809752,0.033321716,0.00069183396,0.00008288815,0.00029388338,0.19061586,0.0013518455,0.00072098145,0.021409776,0.7512944,0.00007771384],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9910691,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99732333,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08179565,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08179565,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.39010945,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.59347177},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2241629490","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199296064.013.0013","title":"Comparative Legal Families and Comparative Legal Traditions","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"reference-entry","venue":"","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":53,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Legal pluralism; Legal realism; Scientism; Sovereignty; Normative; Law; Legal profession; Legal research; Empirical legal studies; Legal history; Political science; Legal culture; State (computer science); Comparative law; Sociology; Social science; Politics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.08876847003633374,"score_gpt":0.3458378726875742,"score_spread":0.25706940265124045,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2241629490","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1512614,0.029767273,0.0090541225,0.01304637,0.00020628607,0.0000381794,0.00014217995,0.000031152147,0.796453],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9834472,0.0071522123,0.0021395455,0.00035178277,0.00021320797,0.000054126096,0.00007646117,0.000015997291,0.006549333],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99590296,0.0027575174,0.00010582663,0.0003922053,0.00056547404,0.00027606302],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9946725,0.0035814624,0.0005750159,0.00038679573,0.00047985764,0.00030445738],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0040975157,0.00022125622,0.00035265,0.0059989705,0.00452601,0.0050344532,0.0008926254,0.0013440812,0.010129112],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009238689,0.00017167906,0.00021703643,0.004835526,0.023769481,0.010547533,0.0032621287,0.001613734,0.0004216012],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000047185395,0.00000629502,0.00031156518,0.000028045679,0.0000023843531,0.000036894053,0.0058035767,0.00007535693,0.000018207116,0.98707634,0.00052213314,0.0061144982],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012944225,0.000017868295,0.001952372,0.00025605276,0.0000067502156,0.00014948133,0.008319648,0.00033299034,0.000037618025,0.94836533,0.040541638,0.000007357104],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006191986,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004816696,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010129112,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0057841064,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028746773,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.041966856},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2242234524","doi":"","title":"IGC 2000: The Constitutional Agenda","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.022729492305968744,"score_gpt":0.28690770868677,"score_spread":0.26417821638080125,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2242234524","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.003623154,0.008471586,0.0022070745,0.11015773,0.0060519767,0.00035349227,0.0023948695,0.00032364175,0.86641645],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.09028137,0.0066062505,0.008186099,0.3518479,0.008629093,0.003534771,0.0058937524,0.0009900127,0.5240308],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98258483,0.00389936,0.00089529314,0.0029824302,0.0061059315,0.003532144],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99439794,0.002044969,0.0003889031,0.0009914751,0.0013113106,0.0008653356],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0272435,0.0021270814,0.0021216231,0.0043850318,0.01008631,0.035902146,0.0099499,0.045407332,0.039803535],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03503868,0.0015262506,0.0017298927,0.00931391,0.014751272,0.013214687,0.010893646,0.03526369,0.016189044],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025212717,0.00006767393,0.00017413043,0.00008778252,0.00000616681,0.00006618953,0.0007143904,0.00026940004,0.00008118138,0.8221177,0.16855805,0.007832134],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000039281727,0.000027992006,0.00093856134,0.00065357634,0.000013040765,0.00005131895,0.00057427626,0.00025199822,0.00010256466,0.08836239,0.90892494,0.000060167706],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0894606,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.040254448,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0894606,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.027471391,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02832385,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19931984},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2243019493","doi":"","title":"The Beginnings of English Law [Book Review]","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; History; Philosophy","score_opus":0.007672248686932119,"score_gpt":0.2715811304718825,"score_spread":0.26390888178495037,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2243019493","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00008970587,0.94735205,0.00021487226,0.011549768,0.004766804,0.000011802072,0.00010228264,0.000024940682,0.0358877],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0025139102,0.92732286,0.0005551735,0.011021707,0.00514176,0.000040764764,0.00026336868,0.00004599182,0.053094454],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99916124,0.00021116564,0.000064545144,0.00007397788,0.0004014744,0.00008749764],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99821645,0.00083023525,0.00012804741,0.0000484219,0.0006652472,0.00011162403],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008603656,0.0005906741,0.0010473282,0.003250207,0.0010600343,0.004492663,0.0010263269,0.0018795962,0.030037185],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004141643,0.0004294182,0.0004672207,0.0048534153,0.0019776751,0.005113652,0.0012202495,0.003008774,0.010627463],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011636803,0.000010288607,0.000054822278,0.0019503084,0.00000949472,0.00007322171,0.00025423235,0.000038180944,0.00004989179,0.015344805,0.8441202,0.13808297],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000026692949,0.000003687405,0.00022370812,0.0022079344,0.000004983652,0.0001105281,0.000120134886,0.0000061729274,0.000008977206,0.002259566,0.9950477,0.000003920056],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011364886,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.025876842,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030037185,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026570053,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0065833163,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10048443},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2246410725","doi":"","title":"Supreme Court of Canada: Canada v. Khadr -- Introductory Note","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Legal Materials","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.006920887764073496,"score_gpt":0.2566967373765154,"score_spread":0.2497758496124419,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2246410725","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.023290215,0.008379206,0.001121011,0.35236883,0.0033482127,0.00019365508,0.0059121824,0.00016766244,0.605219],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.30046427,0.005681052,0.0022811277,0.2859868,0.0011659147,0.00019273245,0.0014742822,0.00015813338,0.4025956],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9956813,0.00022044356,0.00008879941,0.0003896827,0.0018508604,0.0017689579],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99655724,0.0008849275,0.00009940085,0.00008858812,0.001926854,0.00044299747],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016589669,0.00050432753,0.00071970513,0.0018213079,0.02229188,0.008708342,0.003332796,0.012653001,0.016671589],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006711708,0.0005429493,0.00084786426,0.002528819,0.004475736,0.0019736034,0.0018219887,0.009364679,0.001969117],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042822492,0.000030417925,0.002413095,0.00010165043,0.000027860293,0.00046365458,0.0019699193,0.00021872415,0.0003490422,0.34833807,0.638767,0.007277669],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000080344194,0.000024834178,0.013592374,0.0006569787,0.00012519873,0.0002736862,0.0066665323,0.0005984963,0.0013115306,0.040863574,0.9356338,0.00017267987],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98439884,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99401915,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.062676616,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.062676616,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13202652,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4547528},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2248283402","doi":"","title":"Backlash and the Construction of Legal Knowledge: The Case of Child Custody Law","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Backlash; Law; Political science; Child custody; Engineering","score_opus":0.010968618743308175,"score_gpt":0.27389830356292927,"score_spread":0.2629296848196211,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2248283402","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4511054,0.008698135,0.022521596,0.1155902,0.00045241116,0.000121877434,0.000033722743,0.00010608242,0.40137058],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99212426,0.0006811752,0.0012239402,0.0019387704,0.00007655771,0.000043007607,0.0000062128383,0.00002627724,0.0038799043],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9690739,0.019744864,0.00067659735,0.0018383098,0.0045722444,0.0040940875],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9703607,0.024312202,0.0019979388,0.0015141113,0.0011150555,0.0007000445],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.023978963,0.00047065972,0.0010197992,0.0043306937,0.03800029,0.021278512,0.0028974118,0.012546751,0.0035340488],"category_scores_gemma":[0.037919953,0.001127428,0.0008616011,0.0034820905,0.17731558,0.022789055,0.019659065,0.015286589,0.00034674827],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011081927,0.000014901431,0.00031292104,0.000021833735,0.0000029765083,0.00074473134,0.17659439,0.00010923752,0.00010439712,0.8188711,0.0005105169,0.0027018734],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005250941,0.000056833207,0.0010822938,0.00041186076,0.00003144263,0.0010285625,0.19436437,0.0011647362,0.001306305,0.6794304,0.1209849,0.00008583162],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.043573793,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.027371734,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.043573793,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.026738703,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015012604,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19400376},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2254561243","doi":"10.60082/0829-3929.1011","title":"DNA, Discrimination and the Definition of Family Class: M.A.O. v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration)","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Law and Social Policy","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Immigration; Citizenship; Family reunification; Immigration law; Political science; Refugee; Charter; Kinship; Family law; Law; Ethnic group; Contradiction","score_opus":0.03395841325068359,"score_gpt":0.3068113461500742,"score_spread":0.2728529328993906,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2254561243","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.060712595,0.08324455,0.0010784674,0.7585243,0.0075975964,0.00015842581,0.0010582526,0.00004048422,0.08758532],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.65359133,0.03520596,0.0015186099,0.18647195,0.002366311,0.0001655082,0.00042637144,0.00006356482,0.12019036],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977233,0.00047159835,0.00007456199,0.00020037996,0.00077646674,0.0007536792],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969215,0.0008681295,0.00025035843,0.000072886534,0.0010315833,0.0008555348],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028559582,0.0003274831,0.00040712245,0.0014196566,0.011945172,0.0054849265,0.0017155797,0.0040705106,0.0028687867],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004801718,0.0002509089,0.00025581708,0.0019548305,0.010178417,0.0016682547,0.0015913245,0.0044367383,0.00022443499],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000094704905,0.00007524971,0.046480067,0.00033122775,0.000032280714,0.00055356143,0.035577517,0.0004877561,0.0006046389,0.38136613,0.4808401,0.053556804],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000040207495,0.000047138587,0.089081004,0.0013040695,0.000030747877,0.00023775907,0.03168947,0.0004741892,0.00038842336,0.023375625,0.85321,0.000121338904],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9601652,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9781147,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.039834797,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.036279593,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05964863,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26322806},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2254587135","doi":"","title":"Parallel Proceedings - Converging Views: The Westec Appeal","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Race (biology); Flexibility (engineering); Jurisdiction; Law and economics; Political science; Law; Business; Computer science; Sociology; Economics; Management","score_opus":0.013457964438046262,"score_gpt":0.27821201529470724,"score_spread":0.264754050856661,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2254587135","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.023932837,0.004187854,0.031268135,0.15630871,0.001192996,0.000107640706,0.00007717579,0.000091896116,0.78283274],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.84166193,0.003449423,0.013888069,0.04223823,0.0016154775,0.00029472643,0.00008601516,0.00022235991,0.09654372],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9699251,0.010386235,0.0008587328,0.0035026425,0.011845869,0.003481276],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9697319,0.01641312,0.0011632987,0.004491199,0.0067133447,0.0014871056],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.024767868,0.0005143988,0.0010080016,0.0036204054,0.013636181,0.024728658,0.0030317828,0.014479725,0.014158835],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08865275,0.0007513891,0.0011114728,0.0028539032,0.025677219,0.029399643,0.012999251,0.021502377,0.0016595054],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013995364,0.0000063990133,0.00010605758,0.0000106806,0.000005712003,0.000050199975,0.0010303431,0.000071749215,0.000023583225,0.9904426,0.0037910282,0.0044476497],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021805476,0.0000062267927,0.00020645415,0.0000779634,0.000015024334,0.000060798964,0.0015626063,0.0005527829,0.00011127789,0.9539132,0.043457177,0.000014632497],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02072737,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024351997,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024767868,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012665003,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014071808,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13098651},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2255541280","doi":"","title":"Re-Imagining Haj Khalil v. Canada: Cultural Competence and Tort Law","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Tort; Law; Federal court; Political science; Duty; Duty of care; Causation; Immigration; Competence (human resources); Sociology; Psychology; Liability; Social psychology","score_opus":0.010508118503583418,"score_gpt":0.27404111346502413,"score_spread":0.2635329949614407,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2255541280","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.27811086,0.006607513,0.0028697748,0.2990618,0.0003504164,0.000082937426,0.0002122037,0.000032736025,0.41267183],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9773152,0.0015364806,0.00053861475,0.009779229,0.000040467323,0.000009346479,0.000016801472,0.000008939206,0.010755091],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974656,0.00047560688,0.00005390172,0.00015871042,0.0007714283,0.0010747343],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99808574,0.0008521026,0.0001756015,0.00006445624,0.0005087676,0.00031337747],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022139698,0.00031539332,0.00029720916,0.0011315084,0.024058819,0.010203313,0.0014243576,0.0052313968,0.003223028],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0041777245,0.00022950409,0.00030119528,0.0013764879,0.027327726,0.004141891,0.002912965,0.0064325407,0.00015814189],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000138666155,0.000017709408,0.0036788161,0.000040851588,0.0000090571475,0.00081610435,0.06318884,0.00031571006,0.0002603421,0.9114255,0.012345622,0.007887582],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003771863,0.00003505789,0.025905447,0.000806047,0.00009185302,0.0007391167,0.33219317,0.002210226,0.001698668,0.2811764,0.35488403,0.00022224076],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97723025,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9873647,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08439269,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08439269,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.10442571,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6123147},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2255784296","doi":"","title":"상품권거래와 법제개선방안 연구","year":2012,"lang":"ko","type":"article","venue":"정책연구보고서","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Statute; Legislation; Law; Payment; Certificate; Legislature; Finance; Political science","score_opus":0.029746297913652492,"score_gpt":0.317290957939412,"score_spread":0.2875446600257595,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2255784296","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.022342872,0.0068329712,0.020903355,0.027052388,0.005199123,0.0004590346,0.0017794486,0.000763231,0.9146676],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.21399878,0.018302368,0.023051446,0.010527314,0.0018329783,0.00048850453,0.004650387,0.0003602422,0.72678804],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99637043,0.0005406913,0.0001340755,0.0005250788,0.0019805157,0.0004492691],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9956434,0.00069316284,0.00035062083,0.0004011126,0.0026151226,0.0002966384],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025501214,0.0003863119,0.00025019297,0.0015361176,0.0026786688,0.004933641,0.0012718993,0.0012394623,0.051084287],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008398523,0.00023626373,0.000546503,0.0016933382,0.0010229343,0.0035766487,0.0016982662,0.0020160463,0.022025803],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006270911,0.0001458205,0.007160455,0.0004109935,0.000018915402,0.00043655856,0.0030314762,0.0009845156,0.00085827254,0.40448725,0.32181537,0.26058766],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000033810065,0.00003243228,0.0021958773,0.00019222828,0.000011779306,0.00014552794,0.0015430717,0.00037567964,0.00080965564,0.0075663975,0.987107,0.000017080441],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017013468,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015132122,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.051084287,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003933316,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0082156705,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17089397},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2255968584","doi":"","title":"Registered Partnerships: A Model for Partnership Recognition (Disponible en Français: Les unions libres enregistrées: Un modèle de reconnaissance des rapports personnels)","year":2001,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"General partnership; Context (archaeology); Commission; Value (mathematics); Political science; Principal (computer security); Public relations; Sociology; Library science; Law; Geography; Computer science; Computer security","score_opus":0.18752168678533365,"score_gpt":0.3255195186373213,"score_spread":0.13799783185198766,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2255968584","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03023103,0.0039933324,0.09328481,0.03899248,0.0005995657,0.0005272174,0.00024567763,0.00029577938,0.83183014],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.80442715,0.0037350438,0.044565454,0.0025239286,0.00013150564,0.00040204282,0.00014396479,0.00009556251,0.14397544],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98951507,0.005520516,0.00027637059,0.0010392655,0.002222076,0.0014266323],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9943447,0.0017260226,0.0006490888,0.0008395005,0.0011710774,0.0012695352],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0090730935,0.0003222426,0.00027745846,0.0012689179,0.008675822,0.016369255,0.0021553575,0.0033020268,0.013773021],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009828203,0.00045351827,0.000588115,0.0026437365,0.01457909,0.010511316,0.006550026,0.003195603,0.0021889368],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000057603747,0.00000950122,0.0005016457,0.00003103072,0.0000016964759,0.00006201574,0.0047621094,0.00028374157,0.000036109108,0.9743959,0.0046955617,0.015215013],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029244284,0.00009632065,0.0023402805,0.0004936513,0.000018236145,0.0005487282,0.024232537,0.0035837723,0.0002611842,0.20858876,0.7597171,0.00009010632],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.25635785,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.32203764,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.25635785,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.021904236,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.039832,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.50973135},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2256184578","doi":"","title":"Interpreting Copyright Law & Internet Facts","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Statutory law; Statutory interpretation; The Internet; Interpretation (philosophy); Context (archaeology); Legislature; Judicial interpretation; Legal aspects of computing; Common law; Law and economics; Political science; Law; Internet privacy; Business; Computer science; Sociology; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.011692061293764445,"score_gpt":0.3039792003554856,"score_spread":0.29228713906172116,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2256184578","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.044702303,0.0037432676,0.0423698,0.04623433,0.0011780041,0.00019692826,0.0004791451,0.00015065944,0.8609455],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90136844,0.004729261,0.022822682,0.014197767,0.0020243702,0.00023197639,0.00041663507,0.0002121085,0.053996757],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9808195,0.0064172144,0.0012640374,0.0019434056,0.007461894,0.0020939305],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9707875,0.020698257,0.0015824622,0.002005143,0.004592787,0.00033393755],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013624993,0.00056202407,0.00070715125,0.0064407014,0.011104364,0.021473622,0.0028806468,0.008642964,0.0071111456],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03580469,0.0006184646,0.0007406672,0.0056786197,0.04031938,0.012248808,0.0061148787,0.007006343,0.0007447834],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000040545824,0.0000038411195,0.000389501,0.000026013762,0.0000026412724,0.00031158744,0.005125681,0.00021650275,0.000070844566,0.98683804,0.0031106563,0.0039005582],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001489148,0.000010916764,0.0011236027,0.0005717246,0.000021660198,0.00019163216,0.010833716,0.001479542,0.0006713505,0.7632554,0.2217897,0.00003590286],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.16487645,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.17905897,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16487645,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.023058543,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.024981825,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.32783353},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2256484701","doi":"","title":"International Law's Mixed Heritage: A Common/Civil Law Jurisdiction","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":39,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Comparative law; Civil law (Civil law); Law; Political science; Jurisdiction; Common law; Public law; Municipal law; Israeli law; Scholarship; International law; Chinese law","score_opus":0.014208094704537585,"score_gpt":0.2763546892971283,"score_spread":0.2621465945925907,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2256484701","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.24932183,0.011531986,0.01766833,0.032805774,0.0002955859,0.000032519365,0.000069692,0.000047268535,0.688227],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9962304,0.0006344499,0.0007388278,0.00050569326,0.000047259346,0.0000075979633,0.000009826533,0.000006258724,0.0018196972],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99532396,0.0025558362,0.00009428543,0.00035431044,0.0009717313,0.0006998854],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969422,0.0013212217,0.0003340779,0.00045268636,0.0002760258,0.00067373057],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004898314,0.00018389571,0.00041857158,0.0026673097,0.005672713,0.015515567,0.0008459988,0.0016553844,0.0035739117],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0050953734,0.0002621261,0.00030175058,0.003217524,0.036647893,0.013573337,0.0097493855,0.003243348,0.0001468768],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000047525104,0.0000031710276,0.0006352727,0.000010004565,0.0000024118408,0.00004769103,0.008250132,0.000027204464,0.00003879014,0.9862889,0.00054332707,0.004148387],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023978879,0.000056674362,0.00777571,0.00061310374,0.00005829,0.0008572902,0.08027631,0.00064568885,0.00045274175,0.7201982,0.18901058,0.000031474287],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0079868985,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013529985,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015515567,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00409467,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004374656,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0297091},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2257456618","doi":"","title":"Crossing the River by Feeling the Stones: Rethinking the Law on Foreign Judgments","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Common law; Supreme court; Political science; Municipal law; Precedent; Feeling; Public law; Work (physics); Comparative law; Psychology; Social psychology; Engineering","score_opus":0.01322639198532087,"score_gpt":0.2735602578972054,"score_spread":0.2603338659118845,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2257456618","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09113453,0.0076851333,0.026271537,0.42923364,0.002051959,0.00006660646,0.00006644404,0.00016074837,0.4433293],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9287873,0.002112222,0.0042239786,0.04207304,0.0003301068,0.00004624805,0.000021076152,0.00014790642,0.022258284],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9815026,0.010200999,0.000375231,0.0015928736,0.0029512641,0.0033769957],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9828622,0.011485842,0.00064937345,0.0011495106,0.0027450472,0.0011080262],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018984135,0.0004576539,0.000732555,0.0018282162,0.024383618,0.028060446,0.0037467072,0.012934425,0.0057333144],"category_scores_gemma":[0.039544474,0.00043702894,0.0006685797,0.0018529634,0.078228466,0.022240702,0.010228558,0.022398628,0.00074257085],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011540025,0.00001264987,0.0005637934,0.000021551548,0.0000048150873,0.00014564584,0.054784887,0.00012477142,0.00009780746,0.92117727,0.013709937,0.009345323],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002975979,0.00003201907,0.0017432857,0.00053331495,0.000036804904,0.00013808969,0.13290028,0.001076708,0.00080237305,0.61745,0.2451344,0.00012301235],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.35635203,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.51341975,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.35635203,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02408933,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.035048105,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7085557},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2258196808","doi":"","title":"Book Review: Substance and Procedure in Private International Law by Richard Garnett","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Conflict of laws; Law; Doctrine; Political science; Private law; Comparative law; Municipal law; Procedural law; Centrality; Law and economics; Sociology; Mathematics","score_opus":0.004737880568937979,"score_gpt":0.2590876679153135,"score_spread":0.25434978734637553,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2258196808","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00006768355,0.92506295,0.00027240545,0.03746503,0.01713147,0.000010308582,0.000044234224,0.00001303373,0.019932853],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0014093273,0.9220885,0.00033253813,0.018777514,0.018696079,0.000030221583,0.00009059669,0.00004349116,0.038531788],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988187,0.00031138706,0.000077556426,0.00015055123,0.00057066075,0.000071087095],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954656,0.003259058,0.00023466247,0.00011927211,0.0007101462,0.00021137748],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014086324,0.0011241495,0.0016774309,0.0034062753,0.0013330448,0.0038291914,0.0015599144,0.004277252,0.015776074],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005704706,0.0006898794,0.00051590975,0.0057235267,0.0040745432,0.0060611404,0.0018203,0.0069119707,0.010773203],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010319225,0.000014583895,0.000045711895,0.00090068055,0.0000061470646,0.000038443493,0.0001423083,0.00014000172,0.00003191856,0.018808056,0.91899747,0.06086432],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000043145747,0.0000055506853,0.00015192815,0.0017282313,0.0000035193314,0.00012964825,0.000058344052,0.000025065048,0.000013477306,0.0050050635,0.99286735,0.000007452443],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012832964,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020583108,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015776074,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035971384,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005436101,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.052776217},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2259741072","doi":"","title":"LSU Law Center Journal of Civil Law Studies, Vol. 1, 2008 (Complete)","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University; Université de Moncton","funders":"","keywords":"Civil law (Civil law); Law; Comparative law; Property law; Political science; Public law; Private law; Sociology; Property rights","score_opus":0.038348880405159595,"score_gpt":0.3042427812302543,"score_spread":0.2658939008250947,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2259741072","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004309963,0.08841982,0.00058314577,0.073498815,0.0030769152,0.00003238778,0.0017940582,0.00028844812,0.8279965],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.12817079,0.10995556,0.002065362,0.026438981,0.0063976864,0.00027274567,0.0029489505,0.00045150213,0.7232983],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99922025,0.00022292988,0.00003941782,0.000095624804,0.00034002506,0.00008164875],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986216,0.0005640858,0.00009998201,0.00012478732,0.0004543705,0.00013516449],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008827737,0.0004283191,0.00037851447,0.002945013,0.0037131892,0.007013891,0.0005518645,0.0023361037,0.0902608],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0042108386,0.00033761183,0.00014285064,0.005494804,0.0023750134,0.0041171513,0.0015237986,0.0028204904,0.022971794],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000033514032,0.000018774594,0.0004246522,0.0000761854,0.0000023134928,0.000024185649,0.0006356469,0.00002800666,0.000034868714,0.07759371,0.89064,0.030518202],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000023261298,0.0000038170747,0.00094567076,0.000287811,0.0000021753826,0.000054027772,0.00046458733,0.000036104455,0.000033532055,0.0072342567,0.9909313,0.0000044008525],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015810406,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.027826184,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9097392,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0053334828,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0051005175,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30195248},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2259909374","doi":"","title":"A COMPELLING SITUATION: ENFORCING AMERICAN LETTERS ROGATORY IN ONTARIO","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Enforcement; Discretion; Law; Political science; Judicial discretion; Business; Judicial review","score_opus":0.011808045359732067,"score_gpt":0.27419540910986645,"score_spread":0.2623873637501344,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2259909374","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5752663,0.0009922448,0.0016072334,0.065223284,0.0002773879,0.0002321046,0.00013806947,0.000036306505,0.3562271],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96227986,0.00074295024,0.00107986,0.0050914497,0.00008159864,0.00003761702,0.00003426562,0.000010281461,0.030642185],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99418914,0.0010578097,0.0002312661,0.00035335287,0.0018135163,0.0023549693],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99292564,0.002668974,0.0009383609,0.00030329265,0.001666197,0.0014974258],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003118883,0.00017477515,0.00024927745,0.0005064539,0.028134832,0.0068047694,0.0012249746,0.0045953705,0.0042946916],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01296166,0.00057667523,0.000280787,0.0014313251,0.005778252,0.0016345886,0.0029842416,0.003880027,0.00029591253],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00036001776,0.00018605829,0.053040154,0.00024017233,0.000068502784,0.022564376,0.14075482,0.0023863863,0.0055124597,0.6749082,0.063340865,0.036638014],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019243831,0.00017025204,0.09731292,0.0004104716,0.00016884225,0.001994659,0.14068647,0.0031902797,0.0020323356,0.05153473,0.7020113,0.00029532838],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.94369376,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9866779,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.060112223,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.060112223,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09893953,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.43614674},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2260457615","doi":"10.1080/17536235.2007.11424315","title":"Canada and the US Contemplate Changes to Foreign-Judgment Enforcement","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Private International Law","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Enforcement; Conflict of laws; Political science; Law and economics; Law; Publishing; Economics","score_opus":0.016762771594698533,"score_gpt":0.28943341179609955,"score_spread":0.272670640201401,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2260457615","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.023126347,0.015819466,0.00088616676,0.6840294,0.012815964,0.00020948269,0.0062326794,0.00043302542,0.25644758],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.16323057,0.0069894926,0.0023349659,0.55894834,0.0015620211,0.00019507926,0.0017034909,0.0001774979,0.26485857],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9878906,0.0003838805,0.00038101408,0.00040252702,0.0068053138,0.0041366755],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98520494,0.0016410475,0.00058302435,0.00023399314,0.009552739,0.0027842443],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038088358,0.0005791702,0.00066081894,0.001762149,0.018286688,0.008515654,0.0044281404,0.026839374,0.012237764],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016581394,0.0007611862,0.001338386,0.0030691628,0.0030185347,0.0023167601,0.0026808404,0.015366359,0.002143285],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009027248,0.00006096991,0.005109711,0.00008018295,0.00002578083,0.0005418136,0.0011310538,0.0002943543,0.00040941246,0.04003541,0.9402059,0.012015235],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001300001,0.00004255405,0.026791885,0.00033909804,0.00013080833,0.00018447704,0.0030887155,0.0005451413,0.0012878728,0.0048996094,0.9623557,0.00020422612],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98385113,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99446785,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.062418878,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.062418878,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.25155577,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.45288277},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2261852550","doi":"","title":"Reform of Ontario's Law on Jurisdiction","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Law; Conflict of laws; Plaintiff; Political science; Choice of law; Commission; Legislature; Private law; Enforcement; Common law; Blame; Public law","score_opus":0.010073489727356924,"score_gpt":0.27396041100806545,"score_spread":0.2638869212807085,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2261852550","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.038362518,0.005879587,0.0025333238,0.24464844,0.0021869964,0.00016604684,0.0006874061,0.00009020486,0.7054455],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.65630454,0.0052559613,0.0039364714,0.04697802,0.0007166588,0.00013109205,0.00024151528,0.00007594801,0.28635988],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99213237,0.00091248,0.0003640353,0.00087139435,0.0033509238,0.0023689088],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9917999,0.0020270983,0.0004262987,0.0006451899,0.003936294,0.0011651875],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0044056415,0.00034364694,0.00044188977,0.0011313639,0.018820168,0.008409541,0.002008034,0.006193712,0.006047634],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011124106,0.00064377027,0.0005401516,0.0021505123,0.015017386,0.003818593,0.0033401104,0.005724582,0.0005096471],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001593393,0.000008067948,0.0012756173,0.00005543796,0.0000074151185,0.00025462967,0.0084236,0.0002536019,0.0002939004,0.9135723,0.0685107,0.0073287655],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000044879915,0.000017516697,0.0063568274,0.00022390622,0.000035011635,0.00012354479,0.0042068046,0.000660189,0.00033447496,0.041673582,0.9462343,0.00008914294],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98730624,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9945468,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16094628,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.16094628,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.20436528,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9731834},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2262118586","doi":"","title":"THE AMENDMENTS OF THE NEW ROMANIAN CIVIL CODE IN THE FIELD OF CIVIL LAW - THE GENERAL PART. THE NATURAL AND THE LEGAL PERSONS. THE RIGHTS IN REM AND IN THE AREA OF PRIVATE INTERNATIONAL LAW","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Jurnalul de Studii Juridice","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Civil code; Law; Civil law (Civil law); Private law; Political science; Commercial law; Public law; Comparative law","score_opus":0.01294694455184875,"score_gpt":0.29944480007266205,"score_spread":0.2864978555208133,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2262118586","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.045428887,0.009824334,0.020335687,0.00978133,0.0032487805,0.00024868426,0.00030085776,0.0001252934,0.9107062],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7447894,0.007427798,0.025074247,0.013121105,0.0026735533,0.0008902734,0.00062305154,0.00022404289,0.20517656],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9874127,0.0043490734,0.0009167968,0.001747491,0.0043505984,0.0012232639],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995698,0.0013618891,0.00048368628,0.0011366623,0.0011141247,0.00020573827],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0069040344,0.00040697443,0.00052902295,0.0014924912,0.0034031963,0.006194836,0.00074103934,0.0027468447,0.0036591599],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015932918,0.00046093576,0.0009495821,0.0014059928,0.012504228,0.003285215,0.0025580162,0.0077107446,0.0017050512],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000134303455,0.000017335758,0.00037444956,0.00006313503,0.0000041519925,0.00013256817,0.0020832075,0.00030832077,0.0002487306,0.9756488,0.0068114367,0.014294435],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000195097,0.00008570566,0.0035226222,0.00053405337,0.000018762259,0.00056516455,0.00079151813,0.00061072386,0.0009611147,0.10440684,0.88842404,0.00005994957],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009000293,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0060433503,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009000293,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005291735,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009268267,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03839439},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2262497743","doi":"","title":"Reputational Fallacies in International Law: A Comparative Review of United States and Canadian Trade Actions","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Brooklyn journal of international law","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Reputation; State (computer science); Political science; International law; Compliance (psychology); Law and economics; Law; Business; Economics; Social psychology; Psychology","score_opus":0.08039602248073814,"score_gpt":0.403834335563757,"score_spread":0.32343831308301885,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2262497743","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00083764753,0.99674773,0.000020358979,0.00080478407,0.00004737014,0.0000087024755,0.000059588372,0.0000015629931,0.0014723201],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.014291923,0.9851741,0.00006521221,0.00020060455,0.000032673608,0.000007116431,0.00005004574,0.0000010326877,0.00017719083],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99575907,0.00084332767,0.00041547607,0.00019574669,0.0025601732,0.00022618272],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97970355,0.008803476,0.0024561132,0.00030725315,0.008328428,0.0004012302],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009076927,0.00044680428,0.0013992892,0.014204835,0.001426726,0.003560754,0.001096785,0.0010961619,0.0021136396],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023709059,0.00037049342,0.00059184426,0.038792226,0.0021596383,0.001709827,0.0009719974,0.00085494615,0.00018680857],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001749456,0.000043338096,0.0064222165,0.06758976,0.0008546891,0.00021664481,0.0034059833,0.00057809893,0.0002213296,0.012227209,0.07303099,0.8352348],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007490542,0.00017209255,0.110481694,0.10407725,0.00372166,0.00076038623,0.0056275832,0.00020005337,0.00031900159,0.003860606,0.7706019,0.00010284665],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.47397372,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7395171,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.52602625,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0170165,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.052530184,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9424298},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2262629863","doi":"","title":"Relocation, Indeterminacy, and Burden of Proof: Lessons from Canada","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Relocation; Normative; Discretion; Indeterminacy (philosophy); Context (archaeology); Best interests; Supreme court; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; History","score_opus":0.01902613117649053,"score_gpt":0.26801094850233725,"score_spread":0.24898481732584674,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2262629863","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15425941,0.037304666,0.0038529276,0.22468317,0.00080775,0.00014365902,0.00046278094,0.00006919411,0.57841647],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9326117,0.020584391,0.0023994187,0.0130034555,0.00013299045,0.00004672203,0.00012685948,0.00008340437,0.031011041],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9875159,0.002222802,0.00035624212,0.00097650435,0.0044072,0.004521271],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9735478,0.01069311,0.00093121995,0.00078826793,0.010883006,0.0031565619],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008830407,0.00043365234,0.0009495953,0.0028640782,0.03082605,0.015540511,0.003883399,0.0047791055,0.0070534716],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028897282,0.000644078,0.00057937065,0.006370086,0.022720886,0.006041841,0.005331186,0.008245642,0.00032102127],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000089668225,0.000055727898,0.008718806,0.00023752224,0.000037766404,0.001228494,0.038335714,0.0015650344,0.00016380355,0.85790974,0.039766457,0.051891226],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017018702,0.0000878298,0.038352057,0.002715731,0.00019999649,0.0006556981,0.12862235,0.0038991792,0.0008536064,0.18866022,0.63536006,0.00042304344],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99762183,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99881303,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28633225,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.28633225,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.34237024,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8277534},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2262998801","doi":"","title":"Why Should a Confinement Need to Be 'Significant' to Attract Liability? A Proposal to Clarity and Reform the Current Approach to Forcible Confinement","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"CLARITY; Current (fluid); Liability; Business; Political science; Accounting; Engineering; Electrical engineering","score_opus":0.0680318117645147,"score_gpt":0.337792285669337,"score_spread":0.2697604739048223,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2262998801","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0041598883,0.00092379696,0.025022058,0.9256212,0.0045687673,0.000118780925,0.000056086632,0.00012403626,0.0394053],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.35017467,0.0013381366,0.060023703,0.5521491,0.008619553,0.00067241787,0.00006927052,0.00020213853,0.026750963],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9608938,0.013213328,0.0030532593,0.0063109472,0.010462572,0.006066086],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9465881,0.027008723,0.003356504,0.0038530983,0.014779475,0.0044140657],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.049936745,0.0009614062,0.0021986752,0.002301023,0.012820319,0.016330015,0.008810829,0.06445662,0.0053657107],"category_scores_gemma":[0.096804395,0.0013231452,0.0023028092,0.0013951283,0.05979515,0.018119298,0.0075249975,0.04962807,0.0015490899],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015397753,0.000059996026,0.00028851535,0.000054206812,0.000014351024,0.00011605494,0.0017882254,0.00020268813,0.00018664013,0.96215147,0.03167006,0.0034524314],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012920317,0.00009488498,0.0012001822,0.00044874405,0.000087617955,0.00033760068,0.0026657698,0.0014650183,0.00043628615,0.84953195,0.14336117,0.00024152234],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.029894823,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0656341,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06445662,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012071196,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0448544,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26409388},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2264437635","doi":"","title":"Genetics and Insurance Discrimination: Comparative Legislative, Regulatory and Policy Developments and Canadian Options","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Insurance law; Statute; Underwriting; Insurance policy; Legislature; Genetic testing; Medical underwriting; General insurance; Key person insurance; Casualty insurance; Business; Context (archaeology); Political science; Actuarial science; Law; Income protection insurance; Medicine","score_opus":0.021452505730098773,"score_gpt":0.3064814366916654,"score_spread":0.2850289309615666,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2264437635","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11822843,0.043799687,0.0013952015,0.35892344,0.0007914439,0.00009786098,0.00032556898,0.000048304733,0.47639006],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87630457,0.02617565,0.0020643927,0.05876549,0.00037536235,0.00007080007,0.0001740678,0.000036087727,0.036033582],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9883334,0.002021987,0.00033688263,0.00089592807,0.0042186584,0.0041933074],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9842858,0.008239809,0.0010643507,0.00038185556,0.003931437,0.0020967948],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010855941,0.00032233476,0.00043165352,0.0038159548,0.016138224,0.011831772,0.0025037907,0.00869123,0.0068708514],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017597225,0.0005328689,0.00076779746,0.0063699717,0.01677071,0.003467631,0.0035290886,0.005517944,0.00015587352],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005807822,0.000048854785,0.0036364982,0.00013646774,0.000014428769,0.00035163475,0.009223402,0.0005904393,0.00038439693,0.9506484,0.0094327275,0.025474645],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019512915,0.00016884138,0.09110864,0.0015114694,0.00022323523,0.0005927368,0.03824387,0.0023276412,0.0019287745,0.10039268,0.76293397,0.0003730473],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9730083,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98442113,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15314592,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.15314592,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.16871835,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98223066},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2265076134","doi":"","title":"Speakers at the 26th Annual Canada-United States Law Institute Conference","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canada-United States law journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Queen's University; Royal Bank of Canada; Industry Canada; University of Pennsylvania","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.02333792719180397,"score_gpt":0.2463191983104431,"score_spread":0.22298127111863913,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2265076134","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009585888,0.019923093,0.000811006,0.38241234,0.2576356,0.0008012752,0.0031235612,0.00032560888,0.3253817],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.02151749,0.0068346746,0.00034584606,0.020642055,0.02240669,0.00024128823,0.0008021279,0.00016124369,0.9270485],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967135,0.00015020728,0.00005632338,0.00020112074,0.001671634,0.0012072049],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9946286,0.00023498002,0.000075215445,0.000051958752,0.0027732314,0.002236055],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003513139,0.0014695877,0.0010348615,0.0032094473,0.014336787,0.009472824,0.001787952,0.009007106,0.063961424],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0043308996,0.00059880514,0.0008810712,0.002024943,0.0018770519,0.0020313612,0.0026351155,0.0070046843,0.013614111],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033024608,0.000027441965,0.00022051384,0.000024798961,0.0000025914208,0.00006349576,0.00014782492,0.000035356887,0.000091962516,0.0011445396,0.99286157,0.005346889],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016772907,0.000009627297,0.0018228084,0.00009002784,0.000008254209,0.000015692623,0.0008585906,0.000100091194,0.000115249975,0.00037295473,0.9965737,0.000016329237],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.62919235,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.88757396,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.37080765,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.030039243,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05833662,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.74598277},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2265499299","doi":"","title":"Transborder Litigation and Private International Law: The View from Canada","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Conflict of laws; Law; Political science; Private law; Business; Law and economics; Comparative law; Economics","score_opus":0.009362956698560269,"score_gpt":0.24603349731061047,"score_spread":0.2366705406120502,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2265499299","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.31179512,0.021996532,0.001338464,0.32409844,0.00059662986,0.00010977538,0.00040886746,0.000057448975,0.33959875],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9230659,0.010226819,0.00077784614,0.026586238,0.00011441294,0.000042130967,0.0001045402,0.00006786815,0.03901416],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9921245,0.00082986645,0.00013058602,0.00047247807,0.002221537,0.004220988],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98847276,0.0038233767,0.0006669229,0.0002615693,0.0043424447,0.0024328926],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0041937465,0.00048368535,0.00054861646,0.0031467492,0.06349532,0.019525405,0.0032984132,0.011858864,0.008566216],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017029267,0.00059012405,0.0007705189,0.0062275133,0.024017064,0.0056910557,0.00574839,0.011484112,0.0003706683],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000080025566,0.00008055243,0.0120429015,0.00025762306,0.00003267354,0.002292041,0.2244636,0.0007746678,0.00044059966,0.61957216,0.109803975,0.030159162],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000032593853,0.000033121283,0.021612912,0.00085891964,0.00010533794,0.00068549585,0.5435495,0.000873745,0.00045970053,0.027524538,0.40405318,0.0002110309],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9974819,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9990258,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21961144,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.21961144,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.35288158,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9051401},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2266649937","doi":"10.1017/cbo9781139031288.026","title":"The common law regime for enforcing foreign judgments","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Thompson Rivers University","funders":"","keywords":"Content (measure theory); Computer science; Law; Internet privacy; Computer security; Political science; Law and economics; Business; Mathematics; Sociology; Mathematical analysis","score_opus":0.03441302793609317,"score_gpt":0.24462882443107198,"score_spread":0.21021579649497882,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2266649937","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.001808749,0.0024252445,0.013497592,0.009256199,0.0003889826,0.000041053314,0.00008387633,0.00009808026,0.9724001],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5040097,0.0051206164,0.02191685,0.009078146,0.001234126,0.00048472467,0.000179342,0.0003265934,0.4576499],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99276227,0.0025502003,0.00030599645,0.00094589737,0.0026381398,0.00079742493],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99701405,0.0013685579,0.0001828529,0.00075902935,0.0005469918,0.00012862132],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007242717,0.000515659,0.0005581662,0.0019285529,0.0043897373,0.008445579,0.0014919058,0.0059913634,0.014975715],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014529864,0.00051789015,0.0007656304,0.0018843602,0.015035417,0.0054521826,0.0029141216,0.00820194,0.0041067298],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000014677344,0.0000017348816,0.000018531118,0.000007055258,0.000001061217,0.00000656723,0.00014710234,0.000060785478,0.000027432176,0.991846,0.0056401496,0.0022420217],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009189151,0.000007886875,0.00022548405,0.00020832197,0.0000069977077,0.000058313206,0.00027197608,0.00065567176,0.0002597036,0.83501554,0.16326286,0.000018022774],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018096318,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018598227,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018096318,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0069604036,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011391619,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.050501525},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2266894477","doi":"","title":"Transnational Legal Practice (International)","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.014755508824914882,"score_gpt":0.29283895990955533,"score_spread":0.27808345108464044,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2266894477","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0064696013,0.01201872,0.0023420185,0.019338112,0.0014180257,0.000027684775,0.00004394969,0.000053246877,0.95828867],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5374355,0.019194596,0.004876238,0.029244319,0.002262352,0.00025089367,0.00019337407,0.00023350338,0.40630934],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98986524,0.004496974,0.0005523915,0.0013339667,0.0022590563,0.0014924189],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9945041,0.0017124169,0.00054531463,0.0012196723,0.0010397506,0.0009787565],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005938175,0.00036896617,0.00029185522,0.0014064193,0.0062106294,0.009655095,0.0011193841,0.004137531,0.041120183],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00856773,0.00022662812,0.00041595133,0.0026112588,0.010828275,0.011639893,0.012088085,0.0065207323,0.005543694],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000055918968,0.00003182433,0.000577775,0.00012734285,0.0000037578468,0.00023060966,0.020974623,0.000051406827,0.00017283647,0.8852031,0.042980637,0.04964052],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000015600349,0.000013720564,0.00064468,0.00039089588,0.0000019416777,0.0003882201,0.009984518,0.000045916455,0.00008810945,0.020876717,0.96755755,0.0000061410224],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0058734487,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00841221,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.041120183,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0049533676,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0066825785,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13756067},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2270921645","doi":"","title":"Canada-United States Law Institute's Award Presentation to the International Joint Commission","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canada-United States law journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Commission; Joint (building); Presentation (obstetrics); Political science; Law; International law; Library science; Engineering; Medicine; Computer science","score_opus":0.020347778324913374,"score_gpt":0.28208086477534633,"score_spread":0.261733086450433,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2270921645","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0034975503,0.015869692,0.00039402547,0.73742914,0.103019156,0.0003028815,0.0012633454,0.00016302451,0.13806124],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.040154632,0.0076081594,0.0007292241,0.1835375,0.01562556,0.00021453423,0.00050988485,0.00013278409,0.75148773],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9921312,0.00028198297,0.0002356566,0.00055399403,0.004074611,0.002722542],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99342054,0.0008092012,0.00013469065,0.00014040395,0.0030302638,0.0024649242],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005243093,0.001667299,0.0018695553,0.0032140694,0.023993917,0.018679027,0.0030149193,0.041434564,0.021777475],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013189266,0.0009872053,0.0017532286,0.0030584505,0.0051491777,0.0031291412,0.0036811575,0.02500372,0.0035551686],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019634737,0.000025514575,0.00018211427,0.000024752837,0.000009986231,0.000119757366,0.00009515547,0.000092525086,0.00004966047,0.008795206,0.98782754,0.0027581246],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000046290486,0.000014531622,0.0025271687,0.000119410644,0.0000320378,0.00005199405,0.00084412144,0.000241797,0.00013087157,0.0031460426,0.9927874,0.00005834453],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8693296,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9620439,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13067043,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0751501,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.15051767,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5452547},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2271061355","doi":"10.1515/bjes-2015-0017","title":"The Last Habitual Residence of the Deceased as the Principal Connecting Factor in the Context of the Succession Regulation (650/2012)","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Baltic Journal of European Studies","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Directorate-General for Justice; European Commission; Tallinna Tehnikaülikool; University of Glasgow; Institute for Catastrophic Loss Reduction; Emory University","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Principal (computer security); Jurisprudence; Residence; Bachelor; Legal certainty; Ecological succession; Certainty; Member state; Political science; Law; Member states; Subject (documents); Law and economics; Sociology; European union; Business; Computer science; Geography; Computer security; Mathematics; Demography","score_opus":0.08126982000233142,"score_gpt":0.3517897097106578,"score_spread":0.2705198897083264,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2271061355","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9904079,0.00031964591,0.00032455515,0.0005050725,0.000018509101,0.000015082965,0.00006925445,0.0000022691768,0.008337651],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99903405,0.000078771234,0.0000981116,0.000037258116,0.000004706138,0.0000055881646,0.000034257562,8.369583e-7,0.00070642313],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99789196,0.0010067004,0.00018908236,0.00019956702,0.00028274904,0.00043001652],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9932268,0.0017790318,0.002766191,0.0004277477,0.0010157175,0.00078441884],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032916367,0.00010417747,0.00020003636,0.0009894553,0.0017072822,0.0017579391,0.000558038,0.0005046841,0.004083068],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009565993,0.000099589284,0.00013156426,0.0009080254,0.0022638792,0.0010974025,0.0020179276,0.0010447328,0.0003290018],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022004193,0.0001693969,0.82177275,0.00018613873,0.000033318294,0.0038420213,0.106882066,0.00028756153,0.0008511839,0.02410706,0.0018775605,0.039770886],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000032366063,0.00013669593,0.7991241,0.00035034964,0.000021535818,0.00116507,0.18420818,0.0003032019,0.00043958172,0.0018152262,0.0124058025,0.000027058919],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011890459,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018903237,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011890459,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013597866,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014711398,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02364254},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2273064688","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511977947.016","title":"Plate section","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Section (typography); Computer science; Content (measure theory); Information retrieval; Mathematics; Operating system","score_opus":0.030314491771449646,"score_gpt":0.29251493396307027,"score_spread":0.26220044219162064,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2273064688","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00045782098,0.0009722259,0.0038840533,0.0026279415,0.009532517,0.00057093165,0.06328881,0.0062593776,0.9124064],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.001534525,0.0009640625,0.0020332178,0.0012754513,0.00088425097,0.00023146352,0.036884226,0.0028194871,0.9533733],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989008,0.000094194154,0.00007257917,0.00015229642,0.0006671411,0.000112907044],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99588937,0.00067049975,0.00016656992,0.00060919207,0.0022061646,0.0004582357],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014351836,0.0012206237,0.0010822115,0.004148843,0.0020455362,0.0032042023,0.002234221,0.001746905,0.91944903],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0078078834,0.00062982907,0.0009450907,0.0026490616,0.00076540274,0.0026743053,0.0021184182,0.0017231028,0.8300563],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038105896,0.000016287193,0.000068404835,0.0002536284,0.0000018192314,0.000041478277,0.000034055804,0.000042990465,0.000538028,0.0031204028,0.9744289,0.021415947],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004180895,0.000007829548,0.0001674884,0.000069690555,0.000001674601,0.000039041926,0.000033799028,0.00001355503,0.00022837582,0.0004938618,0.9989361,0.0000044642106],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0072283484,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010103455,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08055097,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014706483,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002687966,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11489618},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2277789524","doi":"","title":"Introduction and Histroy of the Canada-United State Law Institute","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; State (computer science); Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.01093863396645248,"score_gpt":0.242480174350489,"score_spread":0.23154154038403651,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2277789524","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0016282747,0.042411868,0.0009076024,0.28446102,0.046729006,0.0001662626,0.0017230464,0.00026332153,0.6217096],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00799022,0.006837047,0.0004506613,0.038209707,0.004914088,0.00006913933,0.0002878359,0.000077880875,0.9411635],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975188,0.00024778006,0.00007856435,0.00037289318,0.0013283858,0.00045359225],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99646616,0.00059529085,0.0000858882,0.00017843557,0.0019849995,0.0006893073],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022319283,0.0007031032,0.00058960484,0.002913699,0.010832996,0.010201863,0.0015265471,0.008346637,0.053175487],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0054409727,0.0008112368,0.0005796388,0.0023617719,0.004109629,0.0034864713,0.0022851664,0.009696541,0.011134786],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000052426267,0.000014582989,0.00024253929,0.000019118534,0.0000013538202,0.00002885893,0.00015341744,0.000025046884,0.000022513781,0.042693373,0.9480873,0.008706644],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004252659,0.0000026229222,0.0012652999,0.000108902175,0.0000031156942,0.000017830633,0.00022141506,0.000044672397,0.000034012042,0.0028243437,0.99546283,0.000010705916],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.67503566,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.85737276,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.32496434,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.025382986,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03642962,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.65375626},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2282866472","doi":"","title":"Enforcement of Foreign Judgments - Should Fraud Unravel All?","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Plaintiff; Enforcement; Context (archaeology); Political science; Law; Safeguard; Business; History","score_opus":0.033505241774585456,"score_gpt":0.32314174602654944,"score_spread":0.28963650425196397,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2282866472","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21333738,0.0054720277,0.01413824,0.31677198,0.0022492553,0.00015536796,0.00009809088,0.00014621533,0.44763136],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9329542,0.0011103066,0.0025376105,0.033391595,0.0005734193,0.000038645514,0.000025882453,0.00003877051,0.029329529],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98765194,0.0036825305,0.00063140277,0.0010017694,0.0039840396,0.0030483282],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98294705,0.005194079,0.0031736647,0.002375629,0.004316665,0.0019928017],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014559395,0.00027517573,0.00064295996,0.0008401605,0.00784811,0.013175068,0.0012859936,0.010004739,0.0038211641],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04528742,0.0003859221,0.0007479314,0.0008751809,0.008119627,0.0077666296,0.004937034,0.010600713,0.0013902944],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000061368984,0.00009141162,0.01762138,0.000106144355,0.000078433455,0.002329624,0.019630572,0.0004262859,0.0010366185,0.8773132,0.030107176,0.051197883],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006115309,0.0002282578,0.021505866,0.0011971043,0.00012915366,0.0037341858,0.030557878,0.0021962374,0.004147106,0.2846056,0.6514298,0.00020762497],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02636957,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03101783,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02636957,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003960859,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0131968465,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07699835},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2283064137","doi":"10.1017/cbo9781107296916.018","title":"Plate section","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Section (typography); Content (measure theory); Computer science; Link (geometry); Information retrieval; Computer network; Mathematics; Operating system","score_opus":0.014214279089183636,"score_gpt":0.29099768553932226,"score_spread":0.2767834064501386,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2283064137","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00046492196,0.001048879,0.004154365,0.0030594561,0.010114931,0.0006093525,0.07146246,0.007139128,0.9019464],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0016816133,0.0011011906,0.0022992275,0.0016630343,0.0010257706,0.00028088913,0.041958984,0.0035307526,0.9464586],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99874073,0.00011273693,0.00008417251,0.00017296347,0.00076429406,0.00012516671],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9950305,0.00087498024,0.0001999835,0.000705189,0.0026443691,0.00054501987],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016379819,0.0011940377,0.0010695033,0.0042149173,0.0020767832,0.0034764146,0.002267744,0.0018626188,0.91796976],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009504764,0.0006487728,0.00093526015,0.0026140423,0.0008231594,0.0028028002,0.0022467244,0.0017942402,0.8268674],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034380264,0.000014567059,0.00006848308,0.00025462368,0.0000017162839,0.000039522445,0.000035582023,0.000038108396,0.00044573375,0.0030375652,0.9767695,0.019260213],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000041416783,0.000007226785,0.0001541781,0.00008000744,0.0000016363646,0.00003846227,0.000035285742,0.00001233524,0.00020461211,0.0005224786,0.99893516,0.000004468406],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0074695037,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010514287,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08203024,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001498493,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029537054,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11700618},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2283283787","doi":"","title":"Canada. La propriété foncière dei Métis manitobani davanti alla Corte suprema","year":2013,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Aisberg (University of Bergamo)","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy","score_opus":0.008655518613613147,"score_gpt":0.19461620131022472,"score_spread":0.1859606826966116,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2283283787","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017752156,0.012453934,0.0007891553,0.04374312,0.0010849118,0.000049312424,0.002886288,0.00011812842,0.92112297],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.19654739,0.0059681213,0.0017230499,0.005237459,0.00017397648,0.000039340684,0.0006962492,0.00009728569,0.78951716],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985757,0.000080612386,0.00004511702,0.0001953202,0.00063026685,0.00047299167],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987207,0.00014497772,0.000069124675,0.000051552594,0.0007602645,0.00025330155],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00070032524,0.00038858273,0.0003750671,0.0010945477,0.01007082,0.0059964266,0.001031944,0.0020936092,0.06789565],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019019392,0.0003813819,0.00027675755,0.0020710733,0.0024632297,0.0014640612,0.0017422033,0.0029842346,0.0036284437],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012641765,0.00003996426,0.0065607517,0.00023392789,0.000033542063,0.00049842376,0.004823986,0.00018401502,0.0010069888,0.6170908,0.29056236,0.07883881],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018681549,0.000008699516,0.007183594,0.00014635408,0.000015336585,0.00011813725,0.001461826,0.00012373006,0.00038702553,0.006131374,0.98438156,0.000023837483],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96490765,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9881874,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06789565,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03900571,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06826042,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28300756},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2283811889","doi":"","title":"Canada: Managing Differences at Home and Abroad: Festvortrag anlässlich der Zeugnisübergabe der Internationalen Rechtsstudien 2003","year":2003,"lang":"de","type":"article","venue":"Hochschulschriftenserver der Universität Trier (Universität Trier)","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Business","score_opus":0.015417507321390831,"score_gpt":0.22119050788596728,"score_spread":0.20577300056457645,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2283811889","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.69819885,0.0041212095,0.0030348839,0.06934402,0.00069889857,0.0005845428,0.0007661974,0.00019546036,0.22305585],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9206953,0.001373827,0.0025552083,0.0027695461,0.000045974582,0.0001259577,0.0003012783,0.00005184272,0.072081044],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971091,0.0005966307,0.000044221637,0.00021169112,0.0006868978,0.0013515054],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954006,0.0006132238,0.00015604864,0.00015939555,0.0011294978,0.0025412492],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004267286,0.0003270538,0.00032718075,0.0009420786,0.023815244,0.008090997,0.0019003808,0.0017802556,0.012017752],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006468976,0.00021044578,0.00029113513,0.0025430128,0.0040933304,0.0020957114,0.0057316595,0.0022979053,0.0006011437],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00064041675,0.0008735892,0.09228743,0.0003455262,0.00008794833,0.0014957184,0.192882,0.0022625807,0.0023691729,0.078191176,0.16302821,0.46553633],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012404298,0.00024726905,0.09161159,0.0002661966,0.000079827994,0.0001648811,0.4453984,0.0012332564,0.0018495548,0.007186521,0.4517338,0.00010462445],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97011,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9891467,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0738265,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0738265,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.21255752,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5356512},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2285720775","doi":"","title":"Non-justiciability in Australian Private International Law: A Lack of 'Judicial Restraint'?","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Melbourne journal of international law","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Justiciability; Law; Doctrine; Political science; Conflict of laws; Judicial review; Prerogative; Adjudication; Jurisdiction; Political question; International law; Politics","score_opus":0.04118482205336851,"score_gpt":0.3727313778072658,"score_spread":0.3315465557538973,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2285720775","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.34275994,0.0039022814,0.016749717,0.11399482,0.00049341365,0.000075191114,0.000039999064,0.000055070417,0.5219296],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.973573,0.00080454844,0.0016646674,0.0053636692,0.00015236119,0.00003952237,0.000012471087,0.00001838059,0.018371278],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99175996,0.0029762017,0.00046815883,0.0008239313,0.0029139004,0.0010577636],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98733693,0.0066415453,0.0009772257,0.0019043678,0.0023370904,0.0008028235],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00904303,0.0001418623,0.0004786863,0.001031825,0.0065498245,0.010517988,0.0017104555,0.0041318857,0.0027114684],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027974216,0.00047009185,0.00029610613,0.0013053357,0.023192408,0.0068830177,0.0055185775,0.0073727285,0.00030240547],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007038346,0.000019246512,0.0009928073,0.000039818176,0.0000036984961,0.00014439016,0.021576429,0.00010609141,0.00029831185,0.96341956,0.0020484994,0.011344073],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000035550598,0.000104442086,0.022689648,0.0006702598,0.000043372005,0.0006626924,0.023761056,0.0026445014,0.0013038223,0.66048205,0.28749353,0.00010912106],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04481104,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06604567,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04481104,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005735813,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01044935,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08910042},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2286779009","doi":"","title":"Directors of the Canada-United States Law Institute","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canada-United States law journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law; History of the United States","score_opus":0.013160852720148088,"score_gpt":0.24593434509686007,"score_spread":0.232773492376712,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2286779009","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008421874,0.01610829,0.0010987378,0.1747406,0.018103037,0.0005995176,0.00557394,0.0008536237,0.77450037],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.01805542,0.0037118196,0.0005714339,0.009653848,0.0012847937,0.00009637101,0.00083513313,0.000111126814,0.96568006],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99271023,0.00025435124,0.00018948526,0.00073267584,0.004340727,0.0017726014],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.976075,0.001241485,0.00053590146,0.00057652296,0.014313962,0.0072571114],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004257204,0.0008571743,0.0009576707,0.0047117835,0.012933317,0.0109863775,0.0021218008,0.006113268,0.077139676],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010995983,0.00084516936,0.0005171613,0.0036831184,0.0022357279,0.001830407,0.0018455848,0.0058448547,0.016080799],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019193783,0.000026227415,0.0010478403,0.000024279514,0.0000039670836,0.000072431474,0.00011669826,0.00007935629,0.00011260145,0.013157843,0.9710798,0.014259654],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007206593,0.000002923753,0.0030106646,0.00003663676,0.0000064970864,0.000018710281,0.00024108628,0.00017355208,0.000106605876,0.00046945413,0.9959133,0.000013331105],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.87627155,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.94041026,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.123728454,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04886485,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.18876207,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35454094},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2288658057","doi":"10.14288/1.0077458","title":"People and place as norms in multistate tort adjudication","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"cIRcle (University of British Columbia)","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Adjudication; Tort; Political science; Law and economics; Law; Sociology; Liability","score_opus":0.006099816499745988,"score_gpt":0.20846105085525632,"score_spread":0.20236123435551034,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2288658057","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.42211023,0.0036217207,0.11204633,0.013721923,0.00043550992,0.0001863224,0.00005697348,0.000070249196,0.44775078],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9920874,0.00029454206,0.004245671,0.00027278563,0.000059749345,0.00008245598,0.0000070014557,0.000012302384,0.0029380617],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97613233,0.016403336,0.00088356744,0.0015586598,0.003635076,0.0013869699],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98331857,0.012048259,0.0018353005,0.0011028098,0.0008339098,0.0008611443],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015996562,0.00036292363,0.00060019793,0.0026136704,0.006960074,0.013707046,0.0018929412,0.0035450193,0.002010326],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019083684,0.0005401619,0.0006532223,0.0021653126,0.10169852,0.012884459,0.012829593,0.0040319148,0.00017272188],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000781152,0.000006693646,0.00041652878,0.000012309021,0.0000029210291,0.000039849674,0.026148181,0.00017996626,0.00005333325,0.9702706,0.000079875615,0.0027819823],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029120332,0.000036793546,0.001718971,0.00012260363,0.000021449248,0.00008157689,0.02811318,0.001410358,0.0003316931,0.94738597,0.020709828,0.00003840084],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01343494,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014867923,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015996562,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007999134,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0059470087,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0845989},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2288822784","doi":"","title":"The Centrality of Irreparable Harm in Interlocutory Injunctions","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Interlocutory; Harm; Centrality; Law; Political science; Business; Appeal; Statistics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.026428508991621046,"score_gpt":0.32245855813267027,"score_spread":0.29603004914104925,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2288822784","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2824635,0.0033298698,0.077142395,0.02384188,0.0002849842,0.00007692193,0.00021557852,0.00007938412,0.6125656],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966434,0.00022468764,0.00072276546,0.00029313876,0.00009969436,0.000016571765,0.000009410582,0.0000148249155,0.0019753987],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9925424,0.0032018195,0.00023977399,0.0011522758,0.0016800102,0.001183714],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9160959,0.069261156,0.005347623,0.00355449,0.0032251629,0.0025154967],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0076452047,0.00029660735,0.001108831,0.005489488,0.00687161,0.01066229,0.0018107546,0.0055132704,0.016999088],"category_scores_gemma":[0.057508174,0.000551452,0.00051625306,0.005126627,0.022583354,0.01600612,0.005309059,0.007062421,0.00061958085],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030483394,0.000011832636,0.0010153977,0.00002660125,0.00000837285,0.0000999329,0.0015109441,0.00043332725,0.000108105276,0.99270004,0.0007208479,0.003334135],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021231657,0.000016014854,0.0015936703,0.000050303017,0.000029254037,0.00020438459,0.0020151462,0.0020201763,0.0001722058,0.98690885,0.0069545256,0.000014282265],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004594322,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0049499157,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016999088,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038388679,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022911732,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05686766},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2291206443","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2738736","title":"Justice LLHeureux-Dubb's Cosmopolitan Legacy: The Value of Comparative Analysis in the Evolution of the Choice of Law Rules Governing Movable Property","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Property (philosophy); Law; Economic Justice; Cosmopolitanism; Value (mathematics); Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Property value; Philosophy; Epistemology; Mathematics; Politics","score_opus":0.026903503431781425,"score_gpt":0.3193625272704075,"score_spread":0.29245902383862604,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2291206443","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20917466,0.023010345,0.008162951,0.1382346,0.0006956726,0.000029104747,0.00013844082,0.000038250353,0.620516],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9769305,0.0024914232,0.001928509,0.0068124123,0.00025591635,0.000024200284,0.000022168748,0.000046173416,0.011488751],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965798,0.0020792035,0.00006335963,0.00057681696,0.00039401997,0.0003068177],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99152887,0.006657276,0.00036660576,0.0007287361,0.0004248218,0.00029359202],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008164928,0.00018643754,0.0005098381,0.0021678002,0.0069266264,0.008202743,0.001071301,0.004721026,0.008236744],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01660223,0.00021461521,0.0002924008,0.0022383777,0.029310716,0.0072370134,0.0031850408,0.0059456667,0.00027548944],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033168802,0.000010464195,0.0009004486,0.000016805989,0.000009380867,0.00008007877,0.004048002,0.00017910854,0.00006154643,0.982929,0.0027801087,0.008952034],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026995407,0.00003629495,0.004846888,0.00031669415,0.000013463243,0.00016814945,0.0058930675,0.00057353015,0.00036322672,0.83782953,0.1498958,0.00003637919],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019603034,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.035600483,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019603034,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0049894466,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030485217,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.043180764},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2292100314","doi":"","title":"Party Autonomy and Consumer Arbitration in Conflict: A “Trojan Horse” in the Access to Justice in the E.U. ADR-Directive 2013/11?","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Arbitration; Law; Political science; Directive; European union; Charter; Economic Justice; Supreme court; Arbitration clause; Common law; Treaty; Law and economics; Sociology; Compulsory arbitration; Business; International trade","score_opus":0.05745122602695391,"score_gpt":0.3414235555081226,"score_spread":0.2839723294811687,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2292100314","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.063608214,0.011158696,0.03929638,0.3459632,0.0016698283,0.000087240696,0.00006617084,0.000055794757,0.5380945],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9370651,0.0023968392,0.0048328713,0.03370031,0.0013964551,0.00014063925,0.000023191107,0.000062087434,0.02038243],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9703105,0.017337196,0.0009215671,0.0029934044,0.0051020025,0.003335372],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98853487,0.008178268,0.00079522136,0.0012121447,0.0007034579,0.0005761026],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019489616,0.0004088222,0.0009420683,0.00077638763,0.009543314,0.016051266,0.002951152,0.018263971,0.0059683234],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031264253,0.0005488712,0.0011993959,0.0014703198,0.041253567,0.017991778,0.011722959,0.017268362,0.0009150883],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008316336,0.0000063427688,0.000070279224,0.00000962421,0.000002226347,0.000047311343,0.0015673448,0.00006298455,0.000033284163,0.99404764,0.0015494569,0.0025951168],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000036073838,0.00002409107,0.00049239444,0.00023065125,0.000011027423,0.00014304972,0.003118135,0.00073742826,0.00023552186,0.9160232,0.078907914,0.000040519622],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013306215,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011491849,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019489616,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0054918574,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0066265925,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10307217},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2293537518","doi":"","title":"Book Symposium on Will Kymlicka’s Multicultural Odysseys","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Multiculturalism; Political science; Sociology; Law","score_opus":0.005800921507748182,"score_gpt":0.26581376111057164,"score_spread":0.26001283960282345,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2293537518","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0015541803,0.1718429,0.0009239216,0.55312896,0.1290493,0.00005519901,0.00021618397,0.00009882919,0.14313056],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.054986984,0.11417242,0.0021330225,0.20577617,0.09393818,0.0002980792,0.0005520337,0.0002905027,0.52785265],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99804,0.00060056883,0.00007345341,0.00021478141,0.00074837566,0.0003228349],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99650204,0.001527155,0.00019579861,0.00019093562,0.0010209435,0.00056325423],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037650792,0.00066852744,0.00073446194,0.0032692186,0.0054662772,0.006278729,0.0012618137,0.0047247126,0.022595288],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0060515846,0.0004935664,0.000717947,0.0019935614,0.00443725,0.00648078,0.0044354643,0.007835644,0.0056350133],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006166183,0.000005854533,0.000036104026,0.000050648916,0.00000272974,0.00004693072,0.0005190932,0.000019092591,0.000040240975,0.03531807,0.9565518,0.0074032284],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000020378138,0.000002956542,0.00012916495,0.00014422716,0.0000013834124,0.00003904443,0.00030761154,0.0000090409285,0.000022586843,0.0025470743,0.9967913,0.000003547539],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0112561295,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023746556,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022595288,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0070010168,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0048598316,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07558876},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2294997926","doi":"","title":"Beals v. Saldanha: Striking the Comity Balance Anew","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Comity; Jurisdiction; Balance (ability); Political science; Law; Economics; Business; Psychology","score_opus":0.029484113913379056,"score_gpt":0.27983907677708153,"score_spread":0.25035496286370246,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2294997926","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07530067,0.0023020133,0.004063142,0.28962415,0.002755948,0.00016411574,0.0005285151,0.00022671724,0.6250347],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5974507,0.0009850704,0.0028323648,0.23664056,0.000595055,0.00010239335,0.00014163148,0.000117396456,0.16113488],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99364895,0.00081630814,0.00023454808,0.0006351397,0.0023046175,0.0023604177],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99622583,0.0012773493,0.00016876614,0.00023521062,0.0013919863,0.00070085475],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0061561186,0.0003939902,0.00058601034,0.0012653556,0.0114966445,0.0061250157,0.002107328,0.014594388,0.008352598],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01583644,0.00053342787,0.0007883016,0.0008148592,0.0073608803,0.003445207,0.0040139193,0.014205782,0.0016466681],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000132143,0.000036641282,0.0028583738,0.000056997214,0.00002935709,0.0009229719,0.00521239,0.00021439684,0.002038025,0.80593204,0.16318505,0.019381706],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023833918,0.00014380677,0.011441405,0.0007400406,0.00016810343,0.00085537345,0.010112765,0.0019352913,0.0053023975,0.20435324,0.76442695,0.0002822582],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.55249226,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8150652,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.55249226,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013938766,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.033573102,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9002864},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2296860909","doi":"","title":"Introduction - Reading Modern Law: Critical Methodologies and Sovereign Formations","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Sovereignty; Law; Modernity; Reading (process); Politics; Critical reading; Sociology; Political science; Philosophy of law; Comparative law; Law and economics","score_opus":0.09181163611098099,"score_gpt":0.39370761344481664,"score_spread":0.30189597733383566,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2296860909","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00887451,0.07389218,0.04829734,0.11472088,0.010256291,0.0002766067,0.0004326681,0.00031379925,0.7429358],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4681125,0.09084596,0.06351428,0.03926771,0.023121977,0.0012375369,0.0007993866,0.0007968064,0.3123038],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976527,0.0014556576,0.00008740787,0.00023032114,0.0004427198,0.00013118071],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99201363,0.0066804765,0.00028587034,0.00024638983,0.0005736919,0.00020000064],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027699394,0.0005836074,0.00051653344,0.002312051,0.0039487756,0.010486513,0.0010648358,0.0025355057,0.016274927],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00877093,0.00030934508,0.00038275795,0.003027422,0.0152646825,0.0093784565,0.0024855516,0.005486201,0.0025164676],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000964939,0.00002315267,0.00023210738,0.00027103332,0.000003825096,0.00007746928,0.016462255,0.00013547111,0.00014133191,0.90232223,0.059506636,0.020814918],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000047716717,0.000018331137,0.00042156308,0.0011649074,0.00000367952,0.00018443934,0.009171457,0.000218531,0.00018012387,0.44336978,0.5452512,0.00001119984],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001946445,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025957366,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016274927,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004989587,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027508147,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.054445088},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2297321629","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2187969","title":"Equity, Unjust Enrichment and PPSA Priorities: KBA Canada, Inc. v. 3S Printers Inc.","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Equity (law); Unjust enrichment; Political science; Law; Restitution","score_opus":0.014695853790185774,"score_gpt":0.29612265113745256,"score_spread":0.2814267973472668,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2297321629","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.025475992,0.009662638,0.0011871122,0.29766494,0.0013403998,0.00017576199,0.0015367193,0.00013295405,0.6628235],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.49802408,0.005159794,0.0020542217,0.1356566,0.00050705415,0.00017512515,0.00055238244,0.000111079506,0.35775965],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9952095,0.00042006822,0.00011186644,0.00027763515,0.002062215,0.0019187771],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968945,0.00092345173,0.00012451783,0.000086835236,0.0013771724,0.0005933924],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036287177,0.00051854266,0.0003870811,0.0011367882,0.014367695,0.009326053,0.0026137775,0.015074561,0.016386699],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008190625,0.0006358757,0.00046050164,0.0020967587,0.004221437,0.0031781434,0.0021510494,0.007739122,0.001107695],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006904873,0.000037124657,0.0020317994,0.00012420265,0.000019962397,0.00033890104,0.0032079332,0.00039777646,0.00028605413,0.57355934,0.40561885,0.014308976],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001260975,0.000045372028,0.020937562,0.00065357686,0.00013651825,0.00024022275,0.008722482,0.0011583442,0.001462682,0.100491405,0.8658386,0.0001871376],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9468923,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9816467,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05310768,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04984268,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13743487,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36163568},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2298261344","doi":"","title":"Johnston and Ferguson (eds), Asia-Pacific Legal Development [Book Review]","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Australian journal of Asian law","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Asia pacific; Publishing; Project commissioning; Political science; Library science; Media studies; Sociology; Engineering; Law; Computer science; Ethnology","score_opus":0.02183914424747425,"score_gpt":0.30363742696625906,"score_spread":0.2817982827187848,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2298261344","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00006761725,0.98245376,0.00021394412,0.0032517985,0.0030584913,0.000020586156,0.00012997731,0.000030859017,0.010772852],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.000589683,0.9816409,0.0003996086,0.0014813966,0.0011189486,0.000037563495,0.00017341773,0.000017218006,0.014541348],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994388,0.00009062233,0.00005589302,0.000058622103,0.0003042541,0.00005175124],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985936,0.0006022769,0.00012881207,0.000035276873,0.0005155014,0.00012454439],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010030326,0.0018060404,0.0023200712,0.005150954,0.0010404731,0.0034488512,0.0016124655,0.002616668,0.03276405],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003010259,0.0009965113,0.0006533169,0.009007944,0.00097551354,0.004990143,0.0012735267,0.0029449135,0.019431742],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001750368,0.000012455795,0.00009818511,0.0027808226,0.000016079814,0.000061447594,0.00018873965,0.00007675011,0.00006318316,0.0017367767,0.78061736,0.2143307],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007889496,0.000014740702,0.0007011619,0.004173982,0.000025368174,0.0003878143,0.00017344269,0.00003003231,0.000038987386,0.001830892,0.9926012,0.000014307658],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019996844,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.044960167,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03276405,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001771613,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005773991,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10960668},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2298741395","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1188","title":"Book Review: Transnational Constitutionalism: International and European Perspectives, by Nicholas Tsagourias (ed)","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Political science; Law and economics; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.01391628105875713,"score_gpt":0.27843217242413737,"score_spread":0.26451589136538023,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2298741395","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00012241889,0.94977313,0.00021407954,0.021544483,0.0096664345,0.0000065087743,0.00006357214,0.000014157521,0.018595245],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.003101605,0.9410881,0.00035283525,0.0073453146,0.014051975,0.000031357107,0.00018735125,0.00002990955,0.033811465],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995223,0.00011067638,0.00002790087,0.00008174481,0.00021100095,0.000046354602],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99880826,0.0007076135,0.00009343769,0.00003776686,0.00025321046,0.0000996576],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006870512,0.0011589073,0.0010608096,0.0028663683,0.0012465329,0.003980638,0.0012150261,0.002278862,0.019850116],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025594365,0.00043646252,0.00047142504,0.0074228826,0.0023978518,0.005893308,0.001365939,0.0037524037,0.0073553254],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014891659,0.000014481801,0.000098115626,0.0008997146,0.000010929936,0.000048363774,0.00023318522,0.0001547263,0.000045802477,0.020982739,0.90417165,0.0733254],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004858189,0.0000055894593,0.00031406822,0.0011335044,0.0000047027947,0.0001256676,0.00013370116,0.000032756412,0.000015223185,0.0049979733,0.9932267,0.0000052112414],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0094238175,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015203335,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019850116,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028149437,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0040177833,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06640524},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2299351235","doi":"10.1017/s0069005800009619","title":"Giving Effect to Out-of-Province Judgments in Class Actions","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Yearbook of international Law/Annuaire canadien de droit international","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Women's and Gender Studies et Recherches Féministes","funders":"","keywords":"Comity; Supreme court; Class action; Plaintiff; Law; Political science; Civil procedure; Jurisdiction; Doctrine; Damages; Settlement (finance); Legislature; Class (philosophy); Federal Rules of Civil Procedure; Business; Computer science","score_opus":0.012287917835134377,"score_gpt":0.2863827659192565,"score_spread":0.2740948480841221,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2299351235","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13220501,0.00073459157,0.0073003112,0.020368816,0.00088008016,0.0002764163,0.00023687985,0.0001747614,0.8378231],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8944765,0.0002480293,0.0019115848,0.004983128,0.00018050041,0.00005404235,0.000058848727,0.0000589788,0.09802835],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9895863,0.0022921194,0.00034428135,0.00083210756,0.0033490376,0.0035962767],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9818827,0.009199523,0.00061904645,0.0012356206,0.005748332,0.0013148134],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0076722726,0.0003365358,0.0004982724,0.0014810791,0.016167725,0.008217933,0.0014787567,0.0042132605,0.013438651],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030397722,0.00044241728,0.00053334783,0.000969056,0.008279323,0.0023832947,0.003911545,0.0066574807,0.0011431592],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023374528,0.00016533864,0.017730393,0.00014238314,0.000057386394,0.0019278671,0.05644518,0.0011020905,0.003101204,0.7337804,0.12704664,0.058267433],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014018285,0.00017001446,0.036292173,0.00058065983,0.00023054324,0.00044542583,0.035417233,0.003821914,0.008810575,0.14758642,0.76624596,0.0002588656],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.63810915,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8212881,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.36189085,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.026217707,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.027167493,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.72804415},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2302468188","doi":"","title":"Same-sex marriage harms free speech, new Ontario judge wrote in 2012","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Free speech; Psychology; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.022499170945129682,"score_gpt":0.2740959175224315,"score_spread":0.2515967465773018,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2302468188","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05555355,0.003980739,0.0020629647,0.63008964,0.0116692595,0.00035180373,0.0013263696,0.00020144701,0.29476422],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.15978585,0.001589547,0.0013461408,0.44978648,0.0021919208,0.00026644388,0.00029742366,0.0000945114,0.38464168],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9899322,0.0009547172,0.0006974117,0.00087737624,0.0040938966,0.0034444127],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9874889,0.005696379,0.00035588126,0.0003439293,0.0044424073,0.0016724517],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008589898,0.00057851675,0.00082016847,0.0009734353,0.03418466,0.0061639566,0.0029806131,0.036167517,0.0066935485],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022177476,0.0010154741,0.001207034,0.00069110305,0.007069921,0.0023105666,0.0028953142,0.022455702,0.0013551466],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014316397,0.00011473332,0.007818381,0.00012778898,0.00008015353,0.0018102368,0.019417988,0.00027356905,0.0014126934,0.1506684,0.8055994,0.012533436],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000117944,0.00010377943,0.01631482,0.00035757513,0.0002447128,0.00026311885,0.017115045,0.0006282088,0.0020072118,0.010502253,0.9521222,0.00022300532],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9160614,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9789752,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0839386,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.030826507,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.086423494,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22366303},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2303337045","doi":"","title":"Section 15(1) at the Supreme Court of Canada 2001.","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Section (typography); Supreme court; Law; Political science; History; Business","score_opus":0.020258215336807002,"score_gpt":0.24963841351475874,"score_spread":0.22938019817795174,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2303337045","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010114449,0.006370528,0.0013276789,0.07043799,0.003487878,0.00061707426,0.015010129,0.00037512206,0.8922593],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.062023073,0.0028658418,0.0018978582,0.1398395,0.0008635073,0.00046393467,0.0027955715,0.0001911569,0.7890595],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9934057,0.00035630495,0.0002102051,0.0005359934,0.0033753293,0.0021164273],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99424297,0.0009984212,0.00017653914,0.00019194967,0.0038042264,0.00058588176],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029384142,0.0008027618,0.000878748,0.0021684668,0.021897,0.009999933,0.0031620206,0.021713883,0.03621155],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009586032,0.0012901053,0.0013452824,0.0032265657,0.0027071019,0.002030416,0.001494715,0.010280428,0.0098348465],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042823645,0.0000661577,0.0022191503,0.0000665946,0.000022920687,0.00023583685,0.0009944099,0.00023865893,0.0003772368,0.10793439,0.8822185,0.00558335],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000725153,0.000026176558,0.015274208,0.00053063117,0.00008573963,0.00010891266,0.0010787327,0.00044646036,0.0006786264,0.014661009,0.9669137,0.00012325238],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96211606,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98711187,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04564219,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04564219,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09420093,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33115882},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2307180944","doi":"","title":"Review of the New Ontario Limitations Regime: Exposition and Analysis","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Exposition (narrative); Law and economics; Economics; Political science; Art; Literature","score_opus":0.029094567732955556,"score_gpt":0.2823597940473716,"score_spread":0.25326522631441606,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2307180944","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007608709,0.7027159,0.0026167263,0.10572913,0.0040884186,0.0001506308,0.0034422453,0.000043663786,0.1736047],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.13812725,0.7543319,0.0029911445,0.0292317,0.0051409104,0.00033124446,0.0018222581,0.00008093068,0.067942694],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.994987,0.00062710646,0.0003045336,0.00042223168,0.0029226555,0.0007364413],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98761415,0.0031034448,0.0012064509,0.00047519532,0.0072166757,0.00038410368],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005658202,0.0006585323,0.0009051636,0.008558048,0.0036008784,0.004948,0.0030081873,0.0028887624,0.006328886],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016358778,0.0006918547,0.000719902,0.015371252,0.0066338535,0.0029538006,0.0018786535,0.0023196263,0.00061809685],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000050536193,0.000020832586,0.0022298985,0.0043551093,0.00007432541,0.00021207967,0.0026547024,0.001414953,0.00027417144,0.4062323,0.45724326,0.12523784],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006138499,0.000008373395,0.007924182,0.002718817,0.00005033168,0.00007423672,0.0008884159,0.00014832208,0.00008337907,0.009893638,0.9781771,0.000027131768],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9075316,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9562159,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09246838,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08038482,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.10436876,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5832354},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2310673271","doi":"","title":"The Impact of 'Stateless Law' on Legal Pedagogy","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Stateless protocol; Law; Political science; Legal education; Sociology; Computer science; State (computer science)","score_opus":0.024473032417540005,"score_gpt":0.37721652258800714,"score_spread":0.35274349017046713,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2310673271","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.74193865,0.000709063,0.0042587304,0.047624096,0.00027546045,0.000053180844,0.00005541949,0.00008699473,0.20499843],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99726605,0.00006292569,0.00029046473,0.0006686983,0.000016440903,0.000017690516,0.0000049053588,0.000012996997,0.0016598882],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9752779,0.01630191,0.00044976897,0.0015157599,0.0041352706,0.0023193834],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.903341,0.06899695,0.0068963235,0.0054109297,0.0070845634,0.008270192],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.018019982,0.00019729561,0.00047447826,0.0016644765,0.009220698,0.012718204,0.0018562814,0.0029689556,0.018339302],"category_scores_gemma":[0.070765436,0.00040097785,0.00040484313,0.0015265245,0.020345142,0.007620997,0.012855666,0.005601345,0.0007101044],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016219713,0.0011913133,0.025438154,0.00012718719,0.000031936193,0.00016305417,0.07312695,0.00065668393,0.00047365972,0.83430344,0.0067558656,0.057569716],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002842874,0.0009847913,0.109351255,0.000778503,0.00016853787,0.0002710561,0.1662174,0.005351586,0.002454204,0.62671256,0.08730805,0.00011772922],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011190761,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021950122,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018339302,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011138324,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.026087943,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09529996},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2313866240","doi":"10.1177/0003603x1305800205","title":"Survey of International Jurisdictions Providing for Judicial Merger Prohibition Decisions","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Antitrust Bulletin","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Commission; Agency (philosophy); Database transaction; Judicial review; Political science; Intervention (counseling); Business; Law; European commission; Public administration; Law and economics; Economics; European union; International trade; Sociology","score_opus":0.04888812493038976,"score_gpt":0.3240987415475461,"score_spread":0.27521061661715635,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2313866240","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.79801035,0.020866437,0.0011770921,0.0035378158,0.000060204697,0.00011069104,0.002853363,0.000077690514,0.17330638],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98039824,0.011550299,0.00069812103,0.0006987248,0.000052809275,0.00006515729,0.002033668,0.000045264216,0.004457811],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9931999,0.0013710575,0.0007176904,0.0006248257,0.0020722507,0.0020143008],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.973176,0.008688952,0.011119885,0.000878376,0.0038666872,0.0022702073],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0049437475,0.00028656106,0.00042881444,0.013882914,0.0025239654,0.0044810507,0.0009942297,0.0010276296,0.008044949],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013334035,0.0003836654,0.00037187876,0.029203953,0.001926897,0.002417573,0.0019281573,0.0018104453,0.0010194766],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00037632545,0.00034703064,0.5323685,0.0015318141,0.00018941754,0.002179888,0.047767777,0.0009607754,0.0029665628,0.11990787,0.051232647,0.24017137],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001796926,0.00016475035,0.6823997,0.0013738385,0.00014525586,0.0024198946,0.051316805,0.00037890646,0.001650897,0.0033855732,0.25667423,0.000072051494],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012425897,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015224361,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013882914,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029670931,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003995309,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.026913047},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2319425583","doi":"10.3917/empa.085.0010","title":"Introduction","year":2012,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Empan","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Lockheed Martin (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.0262513695355356,"score_gpt":0.30853941128298384,"score_spread":0.28228804174744826,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2319425583","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0070884856,0.0064809113,0.0050296653,0.01662272,0.0070896754,0.00024677726,0.0053736893,0.00093444414,0.95113367],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.051767938,0.006584813,0.004724426,0.0069079786,0.002042877,0.00026774796,0.005821008,0.00043473506,0.92144835],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99858946,0.00024437584,0.00008862853,0.00032053073,0.00048011704,0.00027677946],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982455,0.0002572804,0.00013008688,0.00024964998,0.00074047194,0.0003771537],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012862171,0.00083239266,0.0004814893,0.0014386531,0.0025844835,0.005106965,0.0019265807,0.002377618,0.40627402],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0039690807,0.00029261442,0.0007451838,0.0014807795,0.001107367,0.0031312064,0.0033672687,0.0021256509,0.19601436],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022124175,0.00018998346,0.0042481413,0.0008613552,0.00002382114,0.0006939594,0.0030982583,0.00028928972,0.000989401,0.12152864,0.50450724,0.36334866],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000066816674,0.000024575029,0.0012052854,0.00023638795,0.000004382952,0.00017162855,0.0005031768,0.00003595749,0.00015053802,0.004139922,0.9935137,0.000007681111],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00781438,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007634106,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.40627402,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002127723,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004293882,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.84687805},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2320857469","doi":"","title":"Claude Emanuelli. Droit international privé québécois","year":2007,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue internationale de droit comparé","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law and economics; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.023677426058207576,"score_gpt":0.29831138795038836,"score_spread":0.2746339618921808,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2320857469","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0028401907,0.3056238,0.0019931258,0.18946476,0.04808029,0.00006251369,0.002059843,0.0006728753,0.44920266],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.026822437,0.034706224,0.0008715237,0.0061150147,0.0042246464,0.000043000375,0.0003980765,0.00027899304,0.92654],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99844766,0.00025698228,0.00006072557,0.00032911162,0.00063161197,0.0002738919],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977436,0.0005519621,0.00013683026,0.0001326584,0.0009815346,0.00045357618],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015824384,0.0011173466,0.00079587696,0.002715112,0.004446015,0.0044847936,0.0010133793,0.003914249,0.14394107],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004182391,0.00046063287,0.00043399978,0.00296567,0.001287292,0.0026203538,0.0011766203,0.0034341344,0.027439557],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004523039,0.00002010669,0.000544169,0.000114651855,0.000009517821,0.00015753479,0.0003531443,0.00014546818,0.00013388522,0.04469903,0.8767816,0.07699566],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004478651,0.0000026821401,0.0008664205,0.00008663073,0.0000020488885,0.0000768655,0.00012555819,0.000054987282,0.000059251146,0.0008847933,0.9978282,0.000007993536],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4795495,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.510773,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5204505,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011238948,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008491499,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9535164},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2332475208","doi":"10.1093/ulr/5.3.633-b","title":"Peter Kaye (ed.), European Case Law on the Judgments Convention, John Wiley &amp; Sons, Chichester/New York/Weinheim/Brisbane/Singapore/Toronto, 1998, pp. L + 964, ISBN 0-471-94089-5.","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Uniform Law Review","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Convention; Law; History; Political science","score_opus":0.04607043350071265,"score_gpt":0.2981543683563499,"score_spread":0.25208393485563724,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2332475208","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0005640959,0.6590527,0.0032020933,0.06326313,0.0043198154,0.000059376736,0.0004721183,0.000101284015,0.26896527],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.02011914,0.6616312,0.0045219865,0.016533835,0.0037767803,0.00021545062,0.00073100964,0.00020737002,0.29226318],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960937,0.001236214,0.00032338375,0.0004118625,0.0016413451,0.00029353442],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970952,0.0016568047,0.00035636788,0.00013260165,0.0006114417,0.00014754572],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030225453,0.0011856395,0.00080106617,0.0044343905,0.0026855615,0.006571564,0.0015248262,0.005824439,0.037894815],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010372659,0.00097102823,0.0005846739,0.006285409,0.00347774,0.012985968,0.002291688,0.0033107307,0.020385968],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013708074,0.000015314734,0.0001338549,0.0004897461,0.000007958397,0.00010065986,0.00049063476,0.00012584402,0.00006702579,0.07512144,0.86070716,0.062726595],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005478331,0.0000050966796,0.00053662417,0.0010233906,0.000006219217,0.00016988958,0.000286738,0.00005175823,0.00007642173,0.02327764,0.97454315,0.00001761578],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02087923,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.027414674,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.037894815,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004066824,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0066271448,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1267708},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2332491557","doi":"10.1093/tandt/ttt142","title":"'Absolute discretion' in the Singapore Court of Appeal; substance, form, and the company; Fideicomisa; FATCA, the ugly American; French trust disease arrives in Argentina; Cyprus raises its game; Jersey tries to improve its firewall, but must try harder; a Swiss dog seems unlikely to raise its leg; some interesting New Zealand trust possibilities; and Humpty-Dumpty and the split in the Supreme Court in Lehman Brothers","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Trusts & Trustees","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Discretion; Law; Absolute (philosophy); Political science; Law and economics; Business; Sociology; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.02129955411259839,"score_gpt":0.28187587895680133,"score_spread":0.26057632484420296,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2332491557","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012710292,0.004547261,0.0011849017,0.2398595,0.0043249927,0.00016546765,0.0012763774,0.00017692309,0.73575425],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.18049125,0.0011762449,0.0005094775,0.16553539,0.0017289952,0.00015544693,0.00047027567,0.00013897172,0.649794],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957759,0.00071016507,0.00028820318,0.000714583,0.0015598909,0.00095131056],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977831,0.0009515316,0.0001233146,0.00019720808,0.0007521949,0.0001926517],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029352573,0.0007177547,0.0006224108,0.00045032243,0.00974753,0.008834786,0.0013314139,0.014603554,0.033292584],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007893754,0.00067607185,0.0008368296,0.0007984757,0.004204517,0.0033836383,0.002138839,0.014297247,0.008315122],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032947515,0.00003179392,0.00091534626,0.000050444156,0.000015001852,0.00053562375,0.0021132068,0.00008742149,0.00032554337,0.52152854,0.46941414,0.004949996],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000035473462,0.0000310248,0.0043230094,0.00016850681,0.000025343808,0.00023924648,0.0011184848,0.00050674955,0.0004927575,0.03418882,0.95878804,0.00008254531],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.14502572,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.31740138,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14502572,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008383869,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010295922,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28836316},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2333516913","doi":"10.1093/cjcl/cxv003","title":"Exploring a Right to Physician-Assisted Suicide in Singapore","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Chinese Journal of Comparative Law","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Law; Human rights; Constitution; Legislature; Political science; Directive; Common law","score_opus":0.2508070739227968,"score_gpt":0.40914720696840434,"score_spread":0.15834013304560757,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2333516913","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.52171534,0.0072902716,0.0036980321,0.07910792,0.0003028903,0.00014006365,0.00013394801,0.000019645897,0.38759184],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9872406,0.0018184714,0.00047694665,0.004872066,0.00003815287,0.000035988516,0.000020937954,0.00000391245,0.005492869],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9954041,0.0025085718,0.00041616414,0.0003480114,0.00062213076,0.0007009478],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99690586,0.001630717,0.0005441195,0.00019925102,0.00038698473,0.00033300204],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0057057263,0.0002113567,0.00037113467,0.0006972635,0.0054793316,0.0065485123,0.0010287409,0.0050863144,0.0032457784],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005193609,0.00035513818,0.0004898968,0.0010385792,0.013275936,0.0037694154,0.0061527677,0.0048724664,0.0002742781],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019057152,0.00003400929,0.0048354557,0.0001163826,0.000015437736,0.0034193264,0.037106916,0.0003148906,0.000482908,0.9478621,0.0015999251,0.004193549],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013660485,0.00034770925,0.03291124,0.0026334326,0.00018731855,0.006246927,0.14984004,0.0045473375,0.002806589,0.46005788,0.34000376,0.00028120703],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.064470045,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09576405,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.064470045,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008520797,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013694584,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12818956},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2334493510","doi":"","title":"The Puzzle of Family Law Pluralism","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Scrutiny; Pluralism (philosophy); Counterintuitive; Law and economics; Autonomy; Family law; Status quo; Law; Cohabitation; Choice of law; Political science; Sociology; Economics; Conflict of laws; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02165747510458757,"score_gpt":0.28595957104838765,"score_spread":0.26430209594380005,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2334493510","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11099036,0.015830344,0.03466906,0.50707155,0.0010395003,0.00003283962,0.0000713003,0.000112582005,0.33018252],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96930367,0.002577367,0.0043166275,0.011420647,0.00081177434,0.00003552095,0.000018760113,0.00006338166,0.0114522325],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9883553,0.006582411,0.0002742874,0.0015617139,0.0022983046,0.00092795986],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99147123,0.0046720314,0.00077699765,0.001213472,0.0008502293,0.0010160493],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013489098,0.00025034903,0.0005185822,0.0010961874,0.014781934,0.009423101,0.0014740322,0.004362231,0.0032145202],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015720168,0.0003609792,0.00056564517,0.00095773995,0.05740936,0.0107402885,0.006820533,0.008665354,0.00041074108],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004085716,0.000007699816,0.00035603912,0.0000119586675,0.000004191478,0.00007328409,0.0055391067,0.00011279265,0.000033164644,0.9833787,0.0032677609,0.0072111334],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007155461,0.000008692617,0.0003972103,0.00007956778,0.0000028733275,0.000108205975,0.0034637586,0.00032198743,0.000060774164,0.9383857,0.05715373,0.000010376857],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008999775,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0067844735,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014781934,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007622876,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0066610514,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.071338},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W233525522","doi":"","title":"THE RECOGNITION OF FOREIGN JUDGMENTS IN QUEBEC - THE MIRROR CRACK'D?","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Political science; Psychology","score_opus":0.027224442048776908,"score_gpt":0.2752400403669361,"score_spread":0.2480155983181592,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W233525522","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18745637,0.030287182,0.005893816,0.28376698,0.0015472812,0.00018197858,0.0025802488,0.0001672111,0.488119],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9412155,0.0028259468,0.001361446,0.020152403,0.00011092278,0.00005339215,0.00016835654,0.000051435432,0.03406065],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9905282,0.001889416,0.00034737328,0.0011898727,0.0031955508,0.002849507],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9854842,0.0034228002,0.00090948783,0.0011782871,0.008081692,0.0009235169],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009382834,0.00037260677,0.00055521977,0.0021400768,0.018716658,0.011079708,0.0027587595,0.0050060954,0.006887361],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022815868,0.00040218627,0.00045894482,0.0033941923,0.015330328,0.0043664123,0.002311115,0.006209623,0.0005208443],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008959729,0.000028795359,0.019578405,0.0001729779,0.000055054978,0.0007038238,0.039592475,0.0003767249,0.0005858005,0.69435924,0.17544954,0.06900758],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006701818,0.000043738888,0.12675251,0.0019072951,0.00014164699,0.00049214414,0.07180821,0.0019057669,0.0027795848,0.0633569,0.73041344,0.00033163925],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99276924,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99646425,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09602785,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09602785,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12029711,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6967341},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2336068712","doi":"","title":"Crown Copyright and Copyright Reform in Canada","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Notice; Copyright Act; Obligation; Crown (dentistry); Business; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Copyright law; Intellectual property; Economics","score_opus":0.005158111713760381,"score_gpt":0.24017509259749034,"score_spread":0.23501698088372996,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2336068712","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03527174,0.087342486,0.0010288917,0.19255011,0.002502598,0.00015625433,0.00040327953,0.00013100763,0.6806136],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.69042796,0.06626537,0.002166763,0.052161455,0.0010707648,0.00011617413,0.00026639353,0.00010629895,0.18741876],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9881967,0.0008890393,0.00024913627,0.00076127663,0.006569826,0.0033339628],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98875564,0.0019649868,0.00037799162,0.00051485037,0.006779337,0.0016070949],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005493097,0.0004247214,0.00071745896,0.004317167,0.024539154,0.018727932,0.002460068,0.007103625,0.01042877],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017692614,0.00037292327,0.00057451177,0.00821132,0.018500479,0.0053963456,0.0042062607,0.005668787,0.00056352816],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013506319,0.000021552472,0.0005992219,0.0001668106,0.00001014981,0.0001829664,0.004859603,0.00042903534,0.00010955807,0.9046955,0.06085347,0.028058521],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020445075,0.000017695695,0.0045010643,0.0006735991,0.000028148785,0.00006028031,0.005368971,0.000634307,0.00032273898,0.054186836,0.9341226,0.00006329757],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98470646,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9851944,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98127204,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.24118403,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.3984912,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.88011897},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2337479390","doi":"","title":"« Résumé de l’affaire « Association pour l’accès à l’avortement c. Procureur général du Québec » » (2006 QCCS 4694)","year":2016,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Medicine; Philosophy","score_opus":0.016477024676488684,"score_gpt":0.26012798053638964,"score_spread":0.24365095585990096,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2337479390","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0070709903,0.09054524,0.0065453625,0.19661617,0.07801722,0.0012447846,0.048167206,0.0009050544,0.57088804],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.023121884,0.01690093,0.0030557597,0.021394242,0.0057926634,0.00037274053,0.0064531644,0.00022912756,0.9226796],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982785,0.0002841393,0.00015019154,0.00018454944,0.00074082206,0.00036189484],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9955497,0.0007313128,0.0001964168,0.00019899174,0.00294277,0.0003808307],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002622269,0.0007576051,0.00058590196,0.0030914051,0.0051796245,0.003345332,0.0019658464,0.004140878,0.092176884],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0052854014,0.00047005646,0.0006945573,0.0037801922,0.0014761138,0.0012686345,0.0013615543,0.0032772461,0.012671772],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001654608,0.000015727293,0.0003762961,0.00019674074,0.000005400615,0.00007743372,0.00029479075,0.00015085097,0.00015851755,0.005994361,0.9797245,0.012988898],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006047454,0.0000058823985,0.0047350074,0.0001902212,0.0000037056504,0.000026315984,0.00010993924,0.000057286707,0.00011253521,0.00030076204,0.9944383,0.0000140303455],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95140195,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9463709,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.092176884,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.023312284,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.033432152,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30836242},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2338685098","doi":"10.7202/1035848ar","title":"Cameroon: The Law across the Bridge: Twenty Years (1972-1992) of Confusion","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Law; Confusion; Political science; Civil law (Civil law); Common law; Comparative law; Public law; Psychology","score_opus":0.02109000016965107,"score_gpt":0.2922200964594448,"score_spread":0.27113009628979373,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2338685098","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.33665514,0.4454483,0.0014930946,0.12424353,0.004559404,0.00008288461,0.00065281586,0.000032570268,0.086832225],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91991234,0.062242396,0.0005512963,0.006857667,0.0005203339,0.0000315576,0.00011168621,0.00001697423,0.009755661],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988329,0.00044779349,0.000071086746,0.00014200702,0.0001403941,0.0003658967],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981882,0.0008637975,0.0004961174,0.000058966547,0.00024165194,0.00015129722],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027170056,0.00040660665,0.00024925437,0.002167062,0.005317035,0.0045999205,0.0006281916,0.002758938,0.00553585],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005103066,0.00038489042,0.00018281369,0.0049482207,0.006586595,0.004849849,0.002440346,0.0027252275,0.0002888374],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003927967,0.000055299366,0.025054801,0.0016136819,0.000038501643,0.014074394,0.14838661,0.0011011072,0.0018872133,0.49680075,0.05561042,0.25498438],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018900235,0.00006113563,0.08391293,0.0029213214,0.00003170508,0.0022371458,0.06871852,0.0003607925,0.00078175665,0.01152053,0.82934064,0.000094597206],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.15821472,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.20994262,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15821472,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017686019,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010268578,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3145876},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2339487206","doi":"","title":"Book Review of 'Legal Issues in Electronic Commerce, 2nd Edition'","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Cyberspace; Jurisdiction; Mainstream; Subject (documents); Work (physics); Political science; Field (mathematics); Engineering ethics; Public relations; Sociology; Law; Engineering; Computer science; The Internet; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.005614674076155714,"score_gpt":0.28873872352537794,"score_spread":0.2831240494492222,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2339487206","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0006409731,0.5770581,0.0012093756,0.039218765,0.022847096,0.00008043159,0.0009845558,0.00026717802,0.35769352],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.007851922,0.4254083,0.0014124359,0.011067732,0.009189186,0.00007770608,0.0012915196,0.00018744882,0.5435138],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99880755,0.00006458195,0.000027987824,0.00006738896,0.000905958,0.00012654002],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982399,0.00030582014,0.00007225189,0.000056441488,0.0011660754,0.0001595642],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00067605445,0.00088647957,0.00096697814,0.00602746,0.0035222536,0.005578431,0.0016419932,0.0014589292,0.04144738],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029064778,0.00040429473,0.0004971111,0.011551903,0.0024850327,0.0031726812,0.00090705085,0.0023176253,0.015613178],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003100898,0.0000056254903,0.0000453298,0.00021134737,0.00000168645,0.00002624574,0.00015275496,0.00007673725,0.00005227778,0.010299994,0.9463451,0.042779792],"study_design_scores_gemma":[9.05455e-7,0.0000019872034,0.00027972343,0.00023859135,0.0000013794773,0.00003930611,0.00008066297,0.00001917372,0.000010648888,0.00088787806,0.9984364,0.0000032421817],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3281397,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.54535604,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3281397,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013585964,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02266714,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6524594},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2340757021","doi":"10.5539/jpl.v9n2p232","title":"Study on English and French Law","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Politics and Law","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Honesty; Statute; Bad faith; Political science; Good faith; Faith; Fair dealing; Negotiation; Seriousness; Transparency (behavior); Law and economics; Sociology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.023745948562610714,"score_gpt":0.31083573832370504,"score_spread":0.28708978976109434,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2340757021","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06172795,0.01229285,0.0014774791,0.008656623,0.00038903882,0.000038095583,0.0004153237,0.000041617714,0.91496104],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.82960284,0.007560563,0.0013577187,0.0036332652,0.00044389063,0.00007602269,0.00044036278,0.00006226949,0.1568231],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99868673,0.00051103916,0.00005215771,0.00015948086,0.0002768365,0.0003137965],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983656,0.00094412296,0.000102766564,0.00006812748,0.00045570955,0.0000638038],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011942061,0.00029528688,0.00022930898,0.0021981741,0.0039581438,0.0028476475,0.00037893237,0.00079669955,0.020695692],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0027501697,0.000098900135,0.00023762733,0.0022125198,0.0029640517,0.0023732053,0.00076458335,0.0010943412,0.0020347307],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000269193,0.000049523504,0.00229955,0.0001459452,0.0000073516244,0.0007234323,0.022594856,0.00012463775,0.00028574246,0.90589386,0.03430379,0.03354428],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007364814,0.00003407307,0.011839003,0.00025933454,0.000009256064,0.00043000348,0.011296781,0.00024646462,0.00024475498,0.020395136,0.9552204,0.000017475584],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.091980174,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06899054,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.091980174,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0059888056,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025301978,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18288952},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2341203479","doi":"","title":"Displacing the ‘Conjugal Family’ in Legal Policy: A Progressive Move?","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research Portal (Queen's University Belfast)","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Centrality; Jurisprudence; Family law; Domestic relations; Political science; Law; Sociology; Gender studies; Criminology","score_opus":0.028378719095366055,"score_gpt":0.33979014011753006,"score_spread":0.311411421022164,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2341203479","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11357628,0.015947882,0.010266489,0.5659544,0.0018131178,0.00006649278,0.000036833913,0.000074602875,0.2922639],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9599302,0.002445572,0.0015122312,0.02416223,0.00041672774,0.000043034925,0.000011380891,0.000059339447,0.011419309],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9790228,0.01042132,0.00060102926,0.002101328,0.0033491927,0.00450434],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98030925,0.009960811,0.0016321571,0.0014426791,0.0022133074,0.004441748],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.028867798,0.00038835386,0.00084908906,0.0016994729,0.02868026,0.019337542,0.0032682538,0.012245029,0.010135334],"category_scores_gemma":[0.039702073,0.00058459,0.00049423776,0.0021026556,0.11552634,0.018840153,0.01852043,0.016419528,0.0010470569],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010873844,0.000019521878,0.00047130094,0.00003565182,0.0000035759406,0.00009509509,0.042317636,0.000064604406,0.00008473636,0.94079775,0.0024351147,0.013664109],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000052100066,0.00010439453,0.0033114813,0.0009006099,0.000016275435,0.0005603898,0.105302215,0.00024606514,0.00056187797,0.32228032,0.5665645,0.00009981756],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.16630308,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14787862,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16630308,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03396299,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.056364514,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33067024},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2341594630","doi":"","title":"Out of Bounds: Can a Court Sit Outside its Home Jurisdiction?","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University; Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Jurisdiction; Supreme court; Law; Original jurisdiction; Political science; High Court","score_opus":0.011611840874610906,"score_gpt":0.27361274921057477,"score_spread":0.26200090833596384,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2341594630","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.093313225,0.0027156076,0.012773946,0.16215068,0.0011804597,0.0001163806,0.00020515585,0.00015484101,0.7273897],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9249511,0.0007815606,0.0011168226,0.042468425,0.000554979,0.00008301286,0.0000597763,0.00010007687,0.029884296],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9871423,0.0019995312,0.00022710321,0.0014622759,0.0028961515,0.006272599],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99362844,0.0031338066,0.0003324103,0.00041269712,0.0014176855,0.0010749828],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005651518,0.00039613104,0.0008790943,0.0011682827,0.025575966,0.0152022,0.003859204,0.011726991,0.010695886],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023779662,0.00054392935,0.0010653244,0.0013893492,0.018202197,0.010269052,0.0059820055,0.014752685,0.0010337875],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003350862,0.000021641332,0.0023581048,0.000035413526,0.000016460106,0.0017869592,0.021535262,0.00024637504,0.00019221078,0.9317748,0.034150086,0.007849103],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013092825,0.0000704498,0.009605133,0.0012714926,0.00017064126,0.0015622007,0.12511368,0.0018576836,0.0017536227,0.3943474,0.46379673,0.00032009676],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5173326,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5961007,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5173326,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016812693,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.025972286,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9710198},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2342941036","doi":"","title":"Canadian Supreme Court to rule in territoriality principle","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Territoriality; Supreme court; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.022534259832589096,"score_gpt":0.3145621408360887,"score_spread":0.2920278810034996,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2342941036","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0147012845,0.002074581,0.002513326,0.083784014,0.0015801444,0.00017097162,0.0010966393,0.00009042091,0.8939886],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4680423,0.0021368966,0.006326388,0.09896134,0.0012574309,0.0003554333,0.00078865164,0.00020334442,0.42192817],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98448724,0.0014065573,0.0005602368,0.002191191,0.007052055,0.0043026432],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98779476,0.0030735366,0.00026710363,0.0008327716,0.006780569,0.001251334],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008416948,0.0006601627,0.0014784975,0.002760762,0.025887474,0.014139951,0.0048262873,0.017488431,0.018259393],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025868231,0.0011510558,0.00141101,0.003071596,0.010578835,0.0034109063,0.0033687605,0.02131842,0.0018615393],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014042843,0.000014273782,0.00042761807,0.00002101773,0.000018343671,0.00010836281,0.00079995434,0.00021877409,0.000104280894,0.90297455,0.092607096,0.0026916168],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015336517,0.000018361141,0.005086546,0.00040858472,0.00015570203,0.00013547923,0.0022103272,0.0017172644,0.00062793185,0.27801737,0.7112826,0.00018646382],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9670803,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9825013,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.071151525,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.071151525,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.17647626,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.51624286},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2345294130","doi":"","title":"Not Just the Government's Lawyer: The Attorney General as Defender of the Rule of Law","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Constitutionality; Charter; Political science; Legislation; Statutory law; Cabinet (room); Possession (linguistics); Duty; Legislature; Supreme court; Government (linguistics); Common law; Engineering","score_opus":0.023866231487865847,"score_gpt":0.2761670556046301,"score_spread":0.25230082411676424,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2345294130","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13909456,0.025852088,0.008626325,0.5829182,0.0038140086,0.00012594357,0.000026070928,0.00022976313,0.23931308],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7915138,0.0061638,0.0033279685,0.124032356,0.0020941407,0.0000739131,0.000027781509,0.0000828899,0.07268331],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98773605,0.0043713045,0.00047121252,0.0014887729,0.0020034143,0.0039292043],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9869665,0.0069658146,0.0013015853,0.00092986674,0.0013673644,0.002468781],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0091175,0.0003262261,0.0006382622,0.0014361906,0.011776011,0.017026305,0.0014868092,0.024010047,0.005087702],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017464556,0.0006781077,0.000400295,0.0010187902,0.018387638,0.007654862,0.0069066114,0.01399661,0.0009112287],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000051298877,0.00016989614,0.011161758,0.00009023486,0.00002977049,0.0037518092,0.019784072,0.00046735414,0.0017731134,0.82058465,0.07475536,0.067380704],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000104424194,0.0002607282,0.014105706,0.00077612104,0.00007727918,0.0023743254,0.029810408,0.0014209107,0.001484238,0.18134996,0.76808006,0.00015576648],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03319006,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.043124367,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03319006,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006287158,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020031659,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.065993786},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2349165180","doi":"","title":"Research on the Relief System within Marriage","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of China Women's University","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Autonomy; Minor (academic); Law; Harmonious Society; Political science; Economics; China","score_opus":0.05990768823350765,"score_gpt":0.29113031401633077,"score_spread":0.23122262578282313,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2349165180","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4639194,0.04588707,0.007863929,0.017446063,0.0006444691,0.00016260479,0.0001728926,0.000021888514,0.46388167],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9660571,0.018731164,0.00093222345,0.0005617444,0.0002458641,0.00003936989,0.00007858812,0.0000046931473,0.013349181],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987845,0.00042417072,0.00007679358,0.00020782731,0.00029621634,0.00021050744],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99846554,0.00045159739,0.00038642884,0.00008797419,0.00040833125,0.00020000135],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013178518,0.00014108876,0.00019667072,0.0017236836,0.003058106,0.0023646352,0.0007100912,0.00057033176,0.010351941],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0038882813,0.0001516057,0.00027493917,0.0026871995,0.0033113004,0.0029621795,0.0013036776,0.0007863876,0.00042433254],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000044323853,0.00009155703,0.03641837,0.0005218673,0.0000212508,0.000459081,0.036075976,0.00027892445,0.00060503586,0.7647981,0.0036727127,0.15701282],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000043507272,0.00028237177,0.2927559,0.0019359057,0.00010929802,0.0013685348,0.09299228,0.00223483,0.0010688631,0.19823879,0.40889943,0.00007029037],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01606136,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015191117,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01606136,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0042915726,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0045350958,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.034630656},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2359522463","doi":"","title":"Examination and Specific Utilization on Some Clauses Related to See Law","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Seed","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Law and economics; Political science; Economics","score_opus":0.038737816437472955,"score_gpt":0.31250040295890136,"score_spread":0.2737625865214284,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2359522463","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.39840418,0.0031659214,0.067093536,0.009686034,0.0013547607,0.0022814716,0.0064863665,0.00044406447,0.5110837],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.84840816,0.0027222934,0.06214804,0.005115553,0.0004879416,0.0013393126,0.0035935284,0.00053289137,0.075652115],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9946437,0.0013422911,0.0008082882,0.00043251846,0.0019406523,0.000832532],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9372352,0.04407237,0.0055505144,0.0036208208,0.008934421,0.00058677775],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005972554,0.00037690368,0.00046824684,0.0063187103,0.0042132987,0.0026601662,0.0018568406,0.0023332448,0.014435554],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03243144,0.00043457188,0.00041754855,0.007022677,0.0024634183,0.003345043,0.0017487628,0.0035289775,0.0014409133],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003428802,0.00036773575,0.04350393,0.0013770306,0.000051622323,0.0014366425,0.02981986,0.0009419706,0.018694099,0.6806199,0.037265938,0.18557844],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000062233565,0.00032737036,0.11423061,0.0021602057,0.00037849136,0.0032336824,0.052732173,0.0071186037,0.058179695,0.08754205,0.6738346,0.00020022623],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022562556,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.050766904,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022562556,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002958554,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0040106913,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.048291743},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2362438271","doi":"","title":"A Study on Canada's System of Recognizing and Enforcing Foreign Judgement","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Contemporary Legal Science","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Judgement; Enforcement; Law; Conflict of laws; Political science; Business; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.041921985797887994,"score_gpt":0.299298137988939,"score_spread":0.25737615219105103,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2362438271","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7626272,0.0015678527,0.000949777,0.013587689,0.000118072254,0.00020535021,0.0008438787,0.000027948236,0.22007222],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9828006,0.0007807581,0.0005912056,0.00074487284,0.000009161357,0.000020165859,0.00017970138,0.0000080385635,0.014865517],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9943698,0.0006478557,0.0001449451,0.00046243385,0.0024208205,0.001954215],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9916602,0.0011832672,0.0005831062,0.00023283185,0.004836455,0.0015041423],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00254872,0.00022473521,0.00025731782,0.0025632994,0.023088673,0.0067202803,0.0017240051,0.0012714547,0.0053261393],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009449885,0.0002616886,0.0003119543,0.0056506814,0.0048561613,0.0013811423,0.0017449405,0.001934913,0.00030584715],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015519066,0.00025552916,0.26533148,0.00027166144,0.000070411115,0.0017070689,0.13962248,0.0016333984,0.0011614545,0.4466871,0.056907576,0.08619655],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000050700197,0.000100471916,0.46467656,0.00043799705,0.00013841515,0.00056271534,0.22873445,0.0033607325,0.0011166688,0.008337983,0.29231316,0.00017021231],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9962298,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99804235,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.856529,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.143471,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2310421,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99345225},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W238310420","doi":"","title":"Respect for Treaty Rights in Ontario: The Law of the Land?","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Treaty; Law; Political science; Land law; Law of the land; Land rights; Law and economics; Economics; Land tenure; Geography; Constitution","score_opus":0.019298097343400163,"score_gpt":0.26987815335730025,"score_spread":0.2505800560139001,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W238310420","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16970119,0.00441732,0.0021239521,0.15554532,0.00045386204,0.00012407804,0.0007956254,0.000041207117,0.66679734],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.919714,0.0016438124,0.0008278356,0.006163791,0.00014376642,0.00006381191,0.000120023775,0.00004896517,0.071274094],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9914409,0.001242357,0.00029740797,0.00069916405,0.002335091,0.0039851363],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98961276,0.0029513072,0.00089703815,0.00063254795,0.0032012437,0.002705062],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005375938,0.00024833827,0.0007079563,0.001387368,0.025375858,0.012830959,0.0022191384,0.006674579,0.016802866],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022434052,0.0005952204,0.00044614694,0.0040703057,0.017252065,0.006471812,0.004223211,0.005603523,0.0005807611],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000068093344,0.00002922336,0.008344348,0.00008601806,0.000023799697,0.00025458206,0.022671584,0.00034921322,0.00022749206,0.9153181,0.038338527,0.014289096],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010358154,0.000039561695,0.05611529,0.00067936134,0.00008581578,0.00023131073,0.044953514,0.001105871,0.0004507038,0.1980375,0.6979903,0.00020719516],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98835945,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9965334,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12498774,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.12498774,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.22378816,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.90685374},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2383763873","doi":"","title":"Present Situation and Law Enactment Modes of Civil Partnership Legal Recognition","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hebei faxue","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"General partnership; Law; Position (finance); Civil law (Civil law); Political science; Sociology; Public law; Business","score_opus":0.05630706135885637,"score_gpt":0.33342412138380934,"score_spread":0.27711706002495295,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2383763873","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6241405,0.014224128,0.005181723,0.04149864,0.00036748155,0.00009195633,0.00021839127,0.000059548507,0.31421772],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98467803,0.0016865319,0.0010583564,0.0011010813,0.00008335409,0.000027672613,0.000062392195,0.000007830837,0.011294729],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9932822,0.002156946,0.00038218164,0.0010010195,0.0016124519,0.0015650538],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9931693,0.001952228,0.0015391823,0.00046773822,0.0015334514,0.0013381647],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0064165276,0.00012248955,0.0001880135,0.0018919756,0.006417008,0.0061782864,0.0013313129,0.0021141355,0.006071977],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009748406,0.00031372948,0.00021243011,0.0019802756,0.0076548154,0.0070214244,0.0024845197,0.004561082,0.0005969899],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000759003,0.00013411883,0.031644423,0.000106057865,0.000009210255,0.00091656984,0.034558244,0.00021816832,0.00070118235,0.8325945,0.0058542495,0.093187384],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000034657503,0.0002622882,0.15593813,0.0011793185,0.000030458696,0.0058986344,0.13130865,0.0021022705,0.0026114194,0.16091317,0.5394572,0.00026384412],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021266157,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.026732927,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021266157,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009833741,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0070179333,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.071349084},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2391695448","doi":"","title":"Comment on the Case:Big Sky Network Canada, Ltd. v. Sichuan Provincial Government","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Business Research","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Government (linguistics); Interpretation (philosophy); Sky; Law; Federal court; Political science; Business; Geography; Supreme court; Meteorology; Computer science","score_opus":0.05887363084214188,"score_gpt":0.3607075054906494,"score_spread":0.3018338746485075,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2391695448","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01250717,0.0017051103,0.00054745766,0.86555004,0.0040755714,0.00009393466,0.0005150556,0.00007861824,0.11492704],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.12743205,0.0017351515,0.00049440307,0.8001155,0.0029517596,0.00008793601,0.00020501792,0.00005819781,0.06691989],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99525553,0.00051901315,0.00018059612,0.0005518821,0.0018871352,0.0016058417],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9938193,0.0032923608,0.00024110879,0.00015997028,0.0018561594,0.00063121784],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003996336,0.0005465033,0.0008171324,0.0013982014,0.020142525,0.0050950884,0.004025597,0.034033425,0.008840496],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013025903,0.0007733768,0.0012098425,0.0027104227,0.006439179,0.0032697096,0.002284561,0.021893037,0.0014391176],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000065510205,0.000025423902,0.003016346,0.000058001417,0.000027453822,0.0035792093,0.007685229,0.00034218308,0.00036730286,0.14617293,0.83573365,0.0029267243],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009785143,0.00003829148,0.0071495147,0.00034749077,0.00009576071,0.0010900081,0.015865106,0.0010500725,0.0013196717,0.02766264,0.9450069,0.00027663578],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.73430896,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7715058,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26569104,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.031162819,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.038762446,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.53451145},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2392997425","doi":"","title":"Choice of Jurisdiction Clause in Commercial Contract and Its Legal Effects","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Business Research","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Plaintiff; Law; Business; Subject-matter jurisdiction; Original jurisdiction; Law and economics; Political science; Economics","score_opus":0.11529881632202328,"score_gpt":0.4498993918364264,"score_spread":0.33460057551440314,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2392997425","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09426575,0.023177065,0.10417233,0.020304088,0.000577508,0.00019201468,0.00029674935,0.000068496025,0.7569459],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96273893,0.004429048,0.01263944,0.0012455838,0.0004641888,0.00017750947,0.000067307876,0.000030594096,0.018207425],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9918195,0.0031768866,0.00038247032,0.0010000616,0.0028455774,0.00077555457],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98678046,0.009917021,0.00085387885,0.0006006977,0.001369615,0.00047829974],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007884263,0.00034784983,0.0005069647,0.0022211347,0.0035873214,0.0064544203,0.0011732695,0.0030566743,0.008843463],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015485731,0.00039838185,0.00070578017,0.00236209,0.015645633,0.008245159,0.0027113277,0.0051322775,0.00061522843],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000049358987,0.0000055224373,0.00011305579,0.000012870898,0.000002058034,0.00004936668,0.000245426,0.00016193227,0.000071122944,0.9971994,0.00035310583,0.0017812814],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013252912,0.000014658449,0.0005500957,0.00009551074,0.000013998479,0.00013679729,0.00029058917,0.0014033875,0.00026075015,0.9835576,0.013643849,0.000019456587],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006253633,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002928255,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008843463,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004635512,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028421555,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04169649},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2394124988","doi":"","title":"On Classification of Custody Right as to Ne Exeat Right for Children and the First Custody Case in US Supreme Court","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Jinan Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Majority opinion; Dissent; Context (archaeology); Concurring opinion; Political science; Convention; Certiorari; Original jurisdiction; Politics; History","score_opus":0.012234403910452713,"score_gpt":0.28241505025811225,"score_spread":0.27018064634765954,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2394124988","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11536476,0.0032908353,0.0035664476,0.078306235,0.0019031613,0.00021060319,0.0009701805,0.0001140595,0.7962737],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7714782,0.0015190216,0.0034522314,0.13786376,0.0008776797,0.00049375766,0.0005244632,0.00009428795,0.08369661],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98810184,0.0019235534,0.00076426007,0.0016641411,0.0038050888,0.0037411447],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9933013,0.0036840504,0.00038527616,0.00030722312,0.0017115296,0.0006106605],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008445135,0.0005481142,0.00072585436,0.002001597,0.015772173,0.010538803,0.0020052532,0.013491554,0.0039059976],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015425855,0.00078638387,0.0011513673,0.0027308252,0.009237428,0.0040024235,0.0036498343,0.018664349,0.00055512215],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014485639,0.000024661496,0.0011861866,0.000013082193,0.000006717247,0.00031705317,0.0023158751,0.00008930282,0.0002213428,0.96904504,0.024694989,0.0020713054],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025243842,0.00022222675,0.02068075,0.001347049,0.0002904108,0.0013260627,0.01146487,0.002676066,0.0038038245,0.35921258,0.59825224,0.0004714109],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.23431793,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.35828063,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23431793,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013809845,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02001577,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4659081},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2394669739","doi":"10.1057/9780230245266_15","title":"A View from the United States","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Surprise; Jurisprudence; Supreme court; Political science; Law; Legislature; Sociology","score_opus":0.03674315662625157,"score_gpt":0.27654734256507646,"score_spread":0.23980418593882488,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2394669739","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0016333107,0.029771086,0.0003833475,0.025623206,0.0016983688,0.0000042954675,0.00006115768,0.000018923556,0.9408064],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.25000775,0.048114467,0.0016996795,0.079042666,0.0024523633,0.00013998785,0.00024363564,0.00012451562,0.61817497],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99952126,0.00014328679,0.000013050423,0.0000928749,0.00013448962,0.00009501953],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998542,0.00004384035,0.000008706849,0.000014375114,0.00004552545,0.00003336184],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00043595483,0.00040025281,0.00025729305,0.0009245001,0.005313291,0.005797426,0.00044471747,0.0033975097,0.016819056],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007536171,0.00015539138,0.0002907213,0.0010826829,0.0045351177,0.004306293,0.002347803,0.004943037,0.0029367036],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000040050695,0.0000052713567,0.000058011723,0.000020326177,0.0000012739214,0.000037088223,0.0020482277,0.000022480215,0.000030341507,0.92965704,0.056704167,0.01141164],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000022608983,0.000004541202,0.0001314115,0.00017002085,0.000001948295,0.00004213371,0.0010749073,0.00001808169,0.000020258203,0.051762942,0.9467682,0.0000032474043],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.041117672,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06513059,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.041117672,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004958484,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0040918686,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08175665},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2403005348","doi":"","title":"General Report (Intellectual Property and Private International Law)","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Intellectual property; Enforcement; Statutory law; Political science; Law; Conflict of laws; Business","score_opus":0.01764697073525388,"score_gpt":0.28946753313272905,"score_spread":0.27182056239747515,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2403005348","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0037594084,0.04534204,0.0030513287,0.03736488,0.02766779,0.0019927556,0.061951466,0.0016371097,0.8172332],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.012294176,0.046109848,0.0035787527,0.016846387,0.012442798,0.0015006546,0.060420007,0.0006817313,0.84612566],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99757665,0.00028054486,0.00024424048,0.00024288536,0.0014144744,0.0002411934],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99497414,0.0011032242,0.00043987352,0.00039703463,0.0026585055,0.00042715704],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002618305,0.0009714234,0.0005467935,0.0057728416,0.0012649146,0.0037086497,0.0015999661,0.003950396,0.07531201],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0066979537,0.00053786486,0.0005392966,0.006493586,0.0006233191,0.0034426406,0.0017571326,0.0024522243,0.055523556],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010234821,0.000036663005,0.0002678727,0.00015353718,0.0000029049615,0.00004251158,0.00006243079,0.00005633846,0.00009987911,0.00390507,0.97457844,0.02078412],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000031184768,0.000014336609,0.0021859675,0.00021401013,0.0000024132357,0.000054700944,0.00007867461,0.000021497306,0.00006010302,0.00054523785,0.9968156,0.0000043407595],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018011684,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012672511,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07531201,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027669945,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005863734,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25194383},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2404498640","doi":"","title":"The Right Answers to Ontario's Jurisdictional Questions: Dismiss, Stay or Set Service Aside","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Dismissal; Aside; Law; Order (exchange); Political science; Civil procedure; Set (abstract data type); Set-aside; Service (business); Business; Computer science","score_opus":0.012079365742931973,"score_gpt":0.2959594579282441,"score_spread":0.2838800921853121,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2404498640","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09006037,0.0032649848,0.0028703301,0.415882,0.0005778759,0.000088544366,0.00036884795,0.000052950167,0.48683414],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92443895,0.001292576,0.0015143107,0.024305947,0.00023897007,0.000039189217,0.00006365304,0.000040303974,0.04806617],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99112344,0.0012210404,0.00052369444,0.0006612194,0.0030307942,0.0034398271],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.990464,0.0038006469,0.0007297788,0.00070572225,0.002649968,0.0016498681],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0059547513,0.0002543438,0.0005115141,0.00093962596,0.019446533,0.008731015,0.0021730545,0.00956645,0.0077769887],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024964865,0.00050681154,0.00057756633,0.0013442137,0.020368086,0.005001226,0.0037089847,0.006298605,0.0006336343],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000045829063,0.000015345253,0.0045192344,0.00008086407,0.000016861726,0.001126054,0.020253295,0.00024066588,0.0005633959,0.90927386,0.051798232,0.012066276],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000075526295,0.000031950523,0.020651072,0.0006532689,0.00009182959,0.000657929,0.058802728,0.0012992051,0.0011167984,0.30810463,0.60826683,0.00024818428],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.88670677,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9587597,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11329323,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.055299215,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.098888464,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40122575},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2415125617","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2787473","title":"Law in the Future","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University; Vector Institute; Royal Ontario Museum; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Law and economics; Economics","score_opus":0.007864486854241492,"score_gpt":0.27225704928721456,"score_spread":0.26439256243297304,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2415125617","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007080299,0.016528083,0.0014708893,0.42313358,0.002922929,0.000016916936,0.00013341857,0.000042363732,0.5486716],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5082395,0.009540768,0.001473892,0.18115133,0.00626041,0.000100195306,0.0001991609,0.000107816864,0.29292697],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99621046,0.0013885825,0.00010531514,0.00060635817,0.0008056151,0.0008835749],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964154,0.0011064725,0.00023286742,0.00042310485,0.00086545164,0.0009567401],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0058366726,0.0003267462,0.0005065034,0.0010958627,0.011493698,0.012095826,0.001025699,0.01193914,0.029046915],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01022379,0.0002683142,0.0005715251,0.000863215,0.02158875,0.013674369,0.0039868555,0.012797301,0.0037468548],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000069467633,0.000020367457,0.00024645647,0.000010237261,0.0000029495177,0.000040771003,0.00123384,0.00004439334,0.000039329043,0.94019175,0.053090923,0.00507204],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009803812,0.000014277854,0.0005159461,0.00016929091,0.000004673817,0.00006257268,0.0030132579,0.00011922252,0.000056022003,0.42658296,0.5694381,0.000013845791],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024177289,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.032443218,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029046915,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00832101,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012307375,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.097171664},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2416588647","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511667435.005","title":"Olympiodorus","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Moncton","funders":"","keywords":"Materials science","score_opus":0.055518115456918746,"score_gpt":0.2555528285071957,"score_spread":0.20003471305027692,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2416588647","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0014945678,0.0019460537,0.00049272226,0.0005767122,0.0017117404,0.00003999606,0.0005429705,0.00013433279,0.9930609],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.009408108,0.0008304653,0.00037234742,0.00020190421,0.00020893889,0.000025826197,0.00046135683,0.000119735916,0.98837143],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99981946,0.000021586922,0.000007721949,0.000054998527,0.000045120298,0.000051019968],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9999354,0.0000039777537,0.000004214982,0.000007641422,0.000015174406,0.000033657896],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00026216407,0.00077093166,0.00030451457,0.001109194,0.0020320863,0.0029373849,0.0005424142,0.0006995495,0.24895287],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003783846,0.00024735287,0.00028361904,0.0007614064,0.0007014678,0.0015428961,0.0024143574,0.0014163496,0.069574766],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014599743,0.00004813961,0.00068463,0.0002190749,0.000011560316,0.00020096444,0.0010412083,0.00015720582,0.00070229097,0.12803924,0.63202703,0.23672274],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000031020065,0.000008425633,0.0005000268,0.000032856984,0.0000010002323,0.000027025764,0.00009719468,0.000010569039,0.000046883168,0.0012619288,0.9980096,0.0000013607479],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009568903,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.039461594,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24895287,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012072674,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010192887,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8328303},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2418827997","doi":"10.5539/jpl.v9n4p93","title":"Vietnam’s New Law on the Right of Parties to Choose Applicable Law in Civil Relations Involving Foreign Elements","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Politics and Law","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statutory law; Scope (computer science); Law; Private law; Civil law (Civil law); Municipal law; Political science; Public law; Comparative law; Order (exchange); Conflict of laws; Commercial law; Common law; Business; Computer science","score_opus":0.023200792961884275,"score_gpt":0.2876636120949612,"score_spread":0.26446281913307695,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2418827997","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12377017,0.005665867,0.0075413883,0.043482456,0.0011955285,0.00020420508,0.0003831223,0.000054057225,0.81770307],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8698115,0.0034035186,0.0049415277,0.01031174,0.0003334596,0.00017149936,0.0001729005,0.000027403048,0.11082662],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99709857,0.00093279127,0.00023747586,0.00040150198,0.0008567761,0.0004729343],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99691653,0.0014793158,0.0002590133,0.00029964544,0.00076463027,0.00028086983],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033766625,0.00017155208,0.00018932096,0.00057082006,0.0032571924,0.004901755,0.0006121901,0.0020385978,0.0035536198],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0045895986,0.00033061698,0.00017328816,0.00075861905,0.006267214,0.0028521814,0.0017971301,0.0037296237,0.0002870984],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014474021,0.000020577678,0.0014250792,0.000094429466,0.000004059202,0.00053133426,0.01614716,0.0001758269,0.0007695901,0.95445603,0.012504487,0.01385693],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024824973,0.000068529895,0.008943712,0.0005771552,0.000019939112,0.000738473,0.008877465,0.00051690784,0.0011073177,0.07617151,0.9028977,0.000056480985],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06586877,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08722595,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06586877,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0047515905,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010578137,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13097072},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W24405889","doi":"","title":"ISPs are Not Broadcasters According to Supreme Court of Canada","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Political science; Law; Business; Telecommunications; Law and economics; Computer science; Economics","score_opus":0.016322955385347344,"score_gpt":0.2727488517932769,"score_spread":0.25642589640792957,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W24405889","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.038298365,0.0015389221,0.002742575,0.13653125,0.0015786908,0.00025062388,0.003025918,0.00019591283,0.81583786],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5570645,0.0017719845,0.0024134496,0.15240501,0.0008575056,0.00027798102,0.0010207015,0.00012926763,0.28405964],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98327005,0.00083694904,0.00044830516,0.0017589944,0.007778105,0.0059075663],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9852858,0.003321287,0.0005448188,0.00071007945,0.008979067,0.0011589065],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0058947536,0.0004975999,0.00093138526,0.0012660911,0.017380306,0.011158099,0.0027203474,0.012803072,0.008656802],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02171136,0.0008704379,0.00083635445,0.00260157,0.0065478142,0.0025333033,0.0018164857,0.013666024,0.0014396735],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006841083,0.000032338266,0.0029504495,0.000056240653,0.000037857953,0.0003729579,0.0034217623,0.00025617454,0.00043037787,0.76534,0.22090526,0.006128283],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016815405,0.00004758752,0.009348702,0.00042473755,0.000330551,0.00022878744,0.0046462114,0.0014901204,0.0014164739,0.049592163,0.9320954,0.0002110247],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96867263,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9794612,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.038012844,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.038012844,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1471345,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2758038},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2460071636","doi":"10.29173/alr114","title":"Public Policy and Recognition of Foreign Divorces: Zhang v Lin and Marzara v Marzara","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Zhàng; Enforcement; Foreign policy; Scope (computer science); Power (physics); Public policy; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Economics; China; Politics; Computer science","score_opus":0.07699427208444094,"score_gpt":0.32552049343677936,"score_spread":0.24852622135233843,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2460071636","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20727567,0.020027384,0.003869762,0.12457711,0.0009045858,0.0002220009,0.00035034015,0.00022231192,0.64255077],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8801468,0.0043229577,0.0014100461,0.039421923,0.00023048882,0.00008328945,0.00013975042,0.000027432125,0.07421732],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99487054,0.00064734335,0.00011819133,0.00037989282,0.0017791776,0.0022047833],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99680567,0.0014373134,0.00030558874,0.00013995839,0.0008506835,0.00046075665],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004154973,0.00030565474,0.00043559237,0.0014630802,0.012558229,0.006130266,0.002507057,0.008977627,0.003991503],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010359799,0.00052616023,0.000511885,0.001924288,0.0058754766,0.0012807559,0.002040677,0.0055639613,0.00035321424],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000111315734,0.00008947542,0.011925255,0.00031327203,0.000057615995,0.004046287,0.025406068,0.0009974253,0.0012302478,0.8154682,0.09714761,0.043207265],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028278684,0.00016854165,0.054891683,0.0007942155,0.00038001052,0.0029352924,0.026566816,0.0022244689,0.0047266423,0.046050318,0.8605075,0.00047175054],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8857633,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9520093,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8857633,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03747007,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05997742,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27186567},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2461767702","doi":"10.1017/s1474745616000197","title":"John Jackson: A Tribute","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"World Trade Review","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tribute; Art; Philosophy; Art history; Classics; Sociology","score_opus":0.03392591722821833,"score_gpt":0.3365287490613906,"score_spread":0.30260283183317227,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2461767702","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00085523067,0.0941379,0.000598626,0.66647667,0.07454653,0.000029084455,0.000112302165,0.00006825978,0.1631754],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.022905726,0.031798594,0.0005888652,0.5691962,0.017195297,0.000078168545,0.00013050107,0.00013174642,0.35797483],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9954723,0.0013715201,0.0002192376,0.0007526514,0.0015475515,0.00063681207],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9944384,0.001924277,0.00020342722,0.0003044984,0.002282536,0.0008468628],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042666094,0.00062557386,0.0008085665,0.001274909,0.0068661477,0.007517939,0.0015882802,0.010329707,0.030296866],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021326967,0.00033172898,0.0006501151,0.0012304262,0.003428677,0.005273221,0.0028896898,0.011649722,0.0104485415],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000072798603,0.000008479213,0.00006839144,0.000046762194,0.000005239682,0.000082145845,0.00017055724,0.000016830729,0.000043780838,0.051434077,0.93648064,0.011635741],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000032867915,0.000005782042,0.000097258984,0.00019193639,0.000003248332,0.00005940493,0.00018866303,0.000014313394,0.000026981377,0.003972907,0.9954312,0.0000050442445],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024085458,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.033210814,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030296866,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004542574,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009379006,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10135311},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2468736329","doi":"","title":"THE CANADIAN LAW OF TOXIC TORTS, by Lynda Collins & Heather McLeod-Kilmurray","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.01325860125064846,"score_gpt":0.26708937787523995,"score_spread":0.25383077662459147,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2468736329","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0054173563,0.10374472,0.00070570153,0.61392754,0.0051629147,0.00006718365,0.0009741941,0.000052596297,0.26994777],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2406391,0.12601434,0.0027198372,0.16565518,0.0057629137,0.00017181867,0.00067269284,0.00020069774,0.45816335],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9919675,0.00064080895,0.0002388965,0.0006854111,0.0044688876,0.0019986017],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9887939,0.001844488,0.00037710607,0.00029747028,0.0069799307,0.0017071574],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005464214,0.0013649643,0.0008263088,0.0047366926,0.03520422,0.015261043,0.0036474664,0.0177416,0.0123043675],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021291327,0.0013309334,0.0008125505,0.007840625,0.019500325,0.0059165973,0.0030703843,0.010448768,0.001101012],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017378174,0.0000211667,0.00074034143,0.00006949937,0.000010908919,0.000085789005,0.0023364436,0.0002514887,0.00005586509,0.25592083,0.7303937,0.010096657],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019821542,0.000005855405,0.005685475,0.00040280086,0.000028011294,0.00006282139,0.0037994443,0.00022161962,0.00007356924,0.030101411,0.9595047,0.00009460045],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99703085,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9988236,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16130252,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.16130252,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.3411008,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9727702},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2474707143","doi":"10.17345/1082","title":"CLARKSON, Stephen, WOOD, Stephen, A Perilous Imbalance. The Globalization and Canadian Law and Governance, UBC Press, Toronto/Vancouver, 2010","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revista Catalana de Dret Ambiental","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Globalization; Corporate governance; Political science; Law; Economic history; Sociology; History; Economics; Management","score_opus":0.006107625366688574,"score_gpt":0.2404427049458389,"score_spread":0.2343350795791503,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2474707143","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002638448,0.656532,0.0004441675,0.26610705,0.0032945268,0.000027152179,0.001163931,0.000044179178,0.06974855],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.17508574,0.62740433,0.001723939,0.043837994,0.0032180126,0.00006515242,0.001022871,0.00014321202,0.14749867],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985135,0.00020385957,0.000061095314,0.00009882629,0.000785302,0.00033743016],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99666387,0.0007463669,0.000205507,0.00007510151,0.0017653333,0.00054379395],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013575293,0.001137364,0.00057991676,0.004730809,0.01220788,0.008981752,0.0020593372,0.005346098,0.015490676],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003274294,0.00094195793,0.0003796733,0.013133719,0.008025607,0.0070138937,0.00159996,0.005245864,0.0017844985],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014051852,0.000010866406,0.0011848729,0.00018867341,0.000008040845,0.000077233024,0.0047390647,0.000107576714,0.000037917755,0.046133038,0.9254893,0.02200935],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001670168,0.000007211376,0.015761878,0.0013358918,0.000031798365,0.00010408967,0.017018512,0.00008300493,0.000092741066,0.02256406,0.9429358,0.00004821329],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97832197,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9932353,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06865433,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06865433,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0812856,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49812436},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2475766093","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511494611.013","title":"Cambridge Studies in International and Comparative Law","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Content (measure theory); Link (geometry); Computer science; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Information retrieval; Sociology; Mathematics; Computer network","score_opus":0.1510842261441088,"score_gpt":0.41332454842100513,"score_spread":0.2622403222768963,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2475766093","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0042207106,0.065624245,0.00044818452,0.024663253,0.00053142186,0.000013947963,0.00030688682,0.00003516705,0.90415627],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.63645846,0.06863885,0.0009873405,0.0050719175,0.0028984095,0.0001685563,0.00060228584,0.00014004053,0.28503424],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99846846,0.0008127323,0.00006335699,0.000159753,0.0003111817,0.00018451997],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975526,0.0014923263,0.00017315324,0.0003204906,0.00024172064,0.00021976867],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017128225,0.00049459003,0.00054019433,0.0034242724,0.0026578712,0.00735426,0.0006385685,0.002232692,0.0529056],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005042143,0.00017107885,0.00020985688,0.0056756213,0.008356272,0.004939323,0.0018385944,0.0022066347,0.0030249818],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000048358484,0.000008745824,0.00025411538,0.000093581235,0.000002831074,0.000027812945,0.0021712293,0.000035619025,0.000025264944,0.9414044,0.047169413,0.0088021085],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016089254,0.000020165498,0.004350473,0.0012309032,0.00000982059,0.000099028206,0.004797296,0.000119883465,0.000103418664,0.21173286,0.7775098,0.000010221434],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.028018206,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.030607373,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0529056,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009371003,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022807915,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17698687},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2477044125","doi":"","title":"Asia-Pacific Legal Development [Book Review]","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Singapore journal of legal studies","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Asia pacific; Pagination; Publishing; Project commissioning; Index (typography); Library science; Political science; Management; Media studies; Sociology; Law; Art; Ethnology; Computer science; Economics","score_opus":0.03317742970057561,"score_gpt":0.339465686248779,"score_spread":0.30628825654820335,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2477044125","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00016171354,0.9184368,0.0003120581,0.0097353,0.0077632014,0.00006591874,0.00046079545,0.00008077026,0.062983386],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0017292254,0.9232868,0.00079787866,0.00708189,0.0028784028,0.00009023099,0.0006638187,0.000046701618,0.06342513],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995627,0.000058209793,0.000034215955,0.000046782563,0.00025719078,0.000041004125],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986797,0.00034621553,0.00013899105,0.0000424088,0.0006959252,0.000096797085],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005948716,0.0009787943,0.001087508,0.003379852,0.000815138,0.002345366,0.001117904,0.0012262301,0.04502317],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029036175,0.00045371673,0.0005063535,0.008651777,0.0006961945,0.0022204227,0.0012164691,0.002261172,0.018031709],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005506139,0.000007482866,0.000050094182,0.0020172577,0.000010122908,0.00004656253,0.000053701606,0.000039465587,0.000033514647,0.0013026663,0.8527585,0.14367515],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000356915,0.00000577927,0.0004770884,0.0024039256,0.000015655081,0.0001706283,0.000051425795,0.000014608109,0.000019633324,0.00066558557,0.99616635,0.000005777848],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01288748,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.028496379,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04502317,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0014740735,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0079191625,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15061754},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2481554059","doi":"10.1515/9783866536081.313","title":"Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments in the Canadian Common Law Provinces","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Yearbook of Private International Law","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law enforcement; Law; Enforcement; Political science; Geography; Criminology; Psychology","score_opus":0.04062201942039266,"score_gpt":0.278676280110208,"score_spread":0.23805426068981533,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2481554059","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11847207,0.008816102,0.0029178523,0.021771515,0.0005310557,0.00019450928,0.00065370934,0.00008346192,0.84655976],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.77328634,0.0033827943,0.0016314036,0.0015122826,0.00007299547,0.000044221157,0.0001928186,0.000041726962,0.21983545],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9945644,0.00055930135,0.00011611278,0.0003477477,0.001545829,0.0028666498],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99622077,0.0006958463,0.00016281888,0.0001517575,0.0021385856,0.000630273],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002691361,0.00037439298,0.00045507465,0.0027532566,0.022399193,0.009704342,0.0024050153,0.0019854682,0.008570858],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010374862,0.0005063851,0.00034632854,0.005173898,0.0089768935,0.0016080261,0.0020281603,0.0033369611,0.00048387283],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000045338715,0.000059447437,0.01021453,0.000068395726,0.000016456606,0.0003161819,0.036412552,0.001491411,0.00025526012,0.7408367,0.117641285,0.09264249],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025682262,0.000029435763,0.071256265,0.00048559054,0.000048385977,0.00019464508,0.072113484,0.0029020763,0.00085323135,0.06533,0.7865949,0.00016631278],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9967801,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.998808,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14421684,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.14421684,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.26581493,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.99258715},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2481786755","doi":"10.1163/ej.9789004156395.i-320.98","title":"17. New Regulations for Letters of Petition","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"State (computer science); Quarter (Canadian coin); Political science; Law; Capital (architecture); Public administration; History; Archaeology; Computer science","score_opus":0.04471932463761571,"score_gpt":0.2900531101410725,"score_spread":0.24533378550345677,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2481786755","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0031463199,0.0046722763,0.0031963384,0.009781461,0.0045403317,0.0009584211,0.002707581,0.00081499666,0.97018224],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.009019035,0.002581222,0.005549306,0.013834355,0.0010633537,0.0012539924,0.0017969955,0.0003676216,0.9645342],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98773277,0.0019091963,0.0018417294,0.0010522378,0.0060787015,0.0013854244],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9885839,0.0036274388,0.00087799726,0.001183159,0.0052092965,0.0005182585],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007072014,0.0008296529,0.0006761341,0.0034467687,0.004475581,0.007712193,0.0024149686,0.006890297,0.042990703],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012919457,0.0014558766,0.0012734509,0.0021559247,0.0030041672,0.0028641664,0.0025532928,0.008424935,0.050049797],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033417422,0.00010343487,0.00052317086,0.00020867774,0.0000039092124,0.00019879153,0.0019937677,0.00015978316,0.0005765311,0.1553302,0.7998105,0.0410578],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000057942434,0.000011737736,0.0008490087,0.000100515965,0.0000022998681,0.000080306934,0.000111246605,0.000031244737,0.00014547228,0.0012757053,0.9973719,0.000014671386],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.049797494,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08277365,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.049797494,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008054845,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017007323,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14381826},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2483015779","doi":"10.1515/9783866537156.2.83","title":"PRIVATE INTERNATIONAL LAW IN A GLOBALIZING AGE: THE QUIET CANADIAN REVOLUTION","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Yearbook of Private International Law","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"QUIET; Political science; Law; Economic history; History; Physics","score_opus":0.022493179012263952,"score_gpt":0.28643851564635076,"score_spread":0.2639453366340868,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2483015779","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008556736,0.030055704,0.0011808729,0.22988145,0.0026749494,0.000038856528,0.00038952666,0.00009035224,0.7271316],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.28218994,0.033788003,0.0022142255,0.050481524,0.0017587483,0.00007296569,0.00038513725,0.00030489333,0.62880456],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967861,0.00026801063,0.000045763096,0.00024775515,0.0014908313,0.0011615888],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976248,0.0004137471,0.00008739709,0.0001368012,0.001014106,0.0007231795],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023014445,0.0006029432,0.0005561496,0.002230145,0.020715753,0.018167289,0.0016833505,0.005986986,0.016284304],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0060382737,0.00048407327,0.00040519005,0.0052241017,0.022833513,0.009504876,0.0033782383,0.009495785,0.0012559211],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004871835,0.000012179999,0.00012684808,0.00001953762,0.000001730872,0.000033636086,0.0030757813,0.0000916452,0.000031170333,0.8406871,0.1425583,0.013357106],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005839497,0.000003350023,0.0012327369,0.00015078613,0.0000050288795,0.000037686794,0.004404636,0.00015727515,0.00004678394,0.09451932,0.89941555,0.000020984342],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.968729,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9850631,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11564994,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11564994,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1801883,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.839103},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2487283933","doi":"10.14288/1.0077540","title":"A Comparative study of the contract remedy systems between Anglo-American law and Chinese law","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"cIRcle (University of British Columbia)","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Comparative law; Political science; Delict; Black letter law; Private law","score_opus":0.020351678212355603,"score_gpt":0.24015884327160109,"score_spread":0.21980716505924547,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2487283933","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.97732884,0.0003390557,0.00011715435,0.00025245437,0.000005890983,0.000021278232,0.000019681249,0.0000027330896,0.021912968],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990416,0.00017246684,0.00005581957,0.000035212855,0.000003068124,0.0000075145863,0.000021618649,0.0000011206513,0.0006616315],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978491,0.000640686,0.000110929366,0.00018597132,0.0006477377,0.0005656227],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967236,0.0010652095,0.00085251906,0.0001765095,0.00077842514,0.00040374845],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023934918,0.00013133,0.00025186833,0.005062248,0.0051701637,0.0029616249,0.0006834226,0.00032448812,0.0033131815],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005140333,0.00018453225,0.00014600645,0.0074944897,0.0051641604,0.0019842396,0.0017220876,0.00064960535,0.00010086124],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001669011,0.00017845185,0.2526396,0.00025378587,0.00007822445,0.0010122161,0.5174751,0.00036043106,0.0027005717,0.16111143,0.001573962,0.06244933],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020189531,0.00015017879,0.78141236,0.00013223186,0.000051240833,0.00021121926,0.19109716,0.0009820946,0.0004837809,0.0032663916,0.02215276,0.000040375926],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12828514,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.18515728,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12828514,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0100650275,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0053515416,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2550769},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2489818519","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511675805.004","title":"Hape <i>v</i>. Her Majesty the Queen (Attorney-General of Ontario intervening)","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Law Reports","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Jurisdiction; Sovereignty; Subject-matter jurisdiction; International law; Political science; Comity; Charter; Original jurisdiction; Politics","score_opus":0.03400585744532388,"score_gpt":0.28694594396651213,"score_spread":0.25294008652118827,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2489818519","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0018225799,0.0025889412,0.00038818808,0.01484605,0.0033638496,0.00021205914,0.0031234282,0.0005440796,0.9731108],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0021602465,0.0002360605,0.00006896073,0.0012275352,0.00006024553,0.000014053111,0.00019933796,0.00005860989,0.99597496],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992059,0.000035869216,0.000025475043,0.00014725226,0.00030770805,0.00027780156],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99895227,0.00007685646,0.000027572733,0.000047496647,0.0006446211,0.0002510714],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005083929,0.0005408855,0.0004236739,0.0005823647,0.006466035,0.0033746392,0.00089365756,0.0025688708,0.47247157],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015960725,0.00052920275,0.00031633888,0.00061154686,0.00095754204,0.00097015296,0.0018281101,0.0018832809,0.17728145],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015441943,0.000007880161,0.00050935557,0.00003638784,0.0000018438463,0.0001085783,0.00017893889,0.000024839876,0.0001893836,0.004202781,0.98489225,0.009832423],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000021017559,0.0000020827226,0.0009775518,0.000021499085,9.961356e-7,0.0000201038,0.00016160893,0.00002325488,0.000048849233,0.00010549592,0.9986327,0.0000036631893],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.79623425,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9304362,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47247157,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0130429985,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014197417,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7524553},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2490719310","doi":"","title":"Canadian Friend Tsin Wan Receives Title of Friendship Ambassador","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"友声：英文版","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Friendship; Political science; Psychology; Social psychology","score_opus":0.017251415511424797,"score_gpt":0.3110861304010085,"score_spread":0.29383471488958374,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2490719310","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008330625,0.0032377685,0.00045652522,0.16734298,0.043558057,0.00031429285,0.0033838102,0.00037839814,0.77299756],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.01320602,0.0006773447,0.00012407285,0.006893367,0.00093730073,0.000024407616,0.000270056,0.00006237466,0.977805],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986777,0.00006932179,0.000024742114,0.00009125012,0.00040726323,0.00072972913],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9944312,0.0001676785,0.00007239146,0.000070298905,0.0029407567,0.0023175776],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00069633283,0.00076263834,0.0007440343,0.001171371,0.025200883,0.0032312742,0.0008956677,0.002840972,0.28451192],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0042499797,0.0002963674,0.00038108643,0.0011456705,0.0010996803,0.0011081336,0.0013449256,0.003691174,0.05217367],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015345126,0.000014591929,0.00068343146,0.000011757956,0.0000022472104,0.00031522103,0.0005179625,0.00001507001,0.00005325842,0.0018215291,0.98841035,0.008139347],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000035599146,0.000008128608,0.0010567035,0.000018946788,0.0000025702384,0.00015368452,0.00269393,0.000020250473,0.000067639536,0.00016083068,0.9958056,0.000008039226],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8215639,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9557235,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28451192,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016234819,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.028157717,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.95178723},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2492795536","doi":"10.1017/cbo9781139043281.004","title":"Note on the text and translation","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Translation (biology); Natural language processing; Computer science; Linguistics; Artificial intelligence; Philosophy; Biology; Genetics","score_opus":0.04312504416634884,"score_gpt":0.24016169022400322,"score_spread":0.19703664605765436,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2492795536","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0008862418,0.0023130134,0.0046799006,0.017516183,0.056192145,0.0008536252,0.03325503,0.0037995724,0.88050437],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0025871191,0.0021729267,0.0034406115,0.002871293,0.003648113,0.0005386984,0.011950956,0.00336824,0.9694221],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99851173,0.00020979308,0.00015172923,0.00017762101,0.0008504975,0.00009857141],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9917956,0.0024303647,0.00030778247,0.00092848355,0.0042222734,0.000315573],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016374375,0.00098176,0.0009207018,0.0032604793,0.0019361066,0.0040615513,0.0013104203,0.0014817436,0.55542594],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018627789,0.0006099481,0.00053755275,0.0034744595,0.00096829556,0.0034465233,0.0022837361,0.0038782563,0.5403593],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015837702,0.00001236454,0.000016348191,0.00014574375,8.853033e-7,0.000031146945,0.00011617111,0.00002704752,0.00022802973,0.004851011,0.9749946,0.019560687],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002778433,0.0000061601745,0.00012288806,0.00007987317,9.419423e-7,0.000029329665,0.000056666653,0.00001903303,0.00009945119,0.00096207263,0.99861586,0.000004897881],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0059504597,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008474787,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.55542594,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019461171,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027062446,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.63413095},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2493112793","doi":"10.1515/9783866539174.339","title":"The Influence of Swiss Law on Quebec's 1994 Codification of Private International Law","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Yearbook of Private International Law","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Conflict of laws","score_opus":0.017122733301202942,"score_gpt":0.28656212550914495,"score_spread":0.269439392207942,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2493112793","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.047382247,0.01574908,0.002290586,0.038214155,0.0012552148,0.000107345266,0.0011636699,0.00018137271,0.89365643],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.41547096,0.0039778063,0.0015981041,0.0061804666,0.00022838001,0.000118702315,0.00028037827,0.00014486472,0.5720004],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963897,0.0006270157,0.0000689162,0.00030440153,0.0016350372,0.0009750302],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971975,0.0010128362,0.0001135026,0.00018014185,0.0012607258,0.00023531073],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023199762,0.00066545047,0.00036076523,0.003058177,0.010526657,0.008969164,0.0013936887,0.003690298,0.014159194],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0063232924,0.00080488244,0.0005846881,0.0029855713,0.0060462668,0.002346059,0.0015564346,0.0054132994,0.0009147731],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000041419156,0.000030322326,0.001324154,0.000048235754,0.000018009678,0.00023252939,0.00462537,0.0011883226,0.00033205995,0.8312215,0.13521357,0.025724437],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000034978093,0.000026786278,0.018222323,0.00033071262,0.00003304618,0.00012029233,0.0025477847,0.0022782725,0.00083637895,0.029929753,0.9455281,0.00011151841],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9867381,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99328965,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.116290025,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.116290025,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0834159,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.84374714},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2494351525","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511496837.002","title":"Note on transliteration, dates, and translations","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Transliteration; Natural language processing; Artificial intelligence; Linguistics; Computer science; History; Philosophy","score_opus":0.022878521693717863,"score_gpt":0.23541016433680964,"score_spread":0.21253164264309177,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2494351525","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0015462188,0.0051092366,0.012553867,0.012819582,0.03887021,0.001005141,0.025941316,0.004113886,0.8980406],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.006105822,0.0061286376,0.0135634085,0.0034239779,0.0043955585,0.0015015114,0.017804062,0.00880366,0.93827343],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981542,0.000447406,0.0002535592,0.0001853305,0.0008475963,0.000111937516],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9858973,0.0055317245,0.0005512122,0.0014014421,0.0063309497,0.00028724823],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025125782,0.0013720543,0.001332336,0.004351078,0.0019553523,0.003551937,0.0013928873,0.00085423,0.37965783],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022336192,0.0007533977,0.00049248716,0.0065025194,0.0010265303,0.004115601,0.0021375297,0.0044635106,0.3861908],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003711605,0.000019159805,0.000029864626,0.00033388424,0.0000019199013,0.00005638549,0.00066825654,0.00004483566,0.00054222136,0.010545691,0.9511538,0.03656688],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000050637514,0.000008235184,0.00011995403,0.00017205118,0.0000017005287,0.00005575737,0.00015824888,0.000024418528,0.00020738435,0.0017398143,0.9975001,0.0000071273516],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003569829,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0056367107,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.37965783,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001584897,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0023993237,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8848428},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2494374144","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511815300.010","title":"Family law and succession","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Cornerstone; Institution; Harmony (color); Order (exchange); Lease; Family law; Scope (computer science); Social order; Sociology; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Business; History","score_opus":0.029874986560415775,"score_gpt":0.23702590266870951,"score_spread":0.20715091610829373,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2494374144","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.003358651,0.0077056997,0.0011706616,0.0037329858,0.0004897985,0.000025647481,0.00002546379,0.000026074733,0.98346496],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.40722948,0.008785369,0.0014407323,0.003009936,0.00048710257,0.0000974984,0.00006718776,0.00005019879,0.5788325],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99923503,0.0002515615,0.000025840793,0.00013584267,0.0001841729,0.000167562],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99973387,0.00007563519,0.000020951999,0.000048798553,0.000074780255,0.000045996407],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010439215,0.00028482708,0.00022822624,0.00073298067,0.0049116663,0.0037022014,0.00072025915,0.0013241891,0.021110302],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020863365,0.00015862002,0.00015261561,0.0006268779,0.011740412,0.0032234157,0.002120758,0.002077829,0.002465906],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000272289,0.000006226953,0.00006638853,0.000008931581,4.0947893e-7,0.000035252768,0.0013000681,0.00004061901,0.000015137161,0.97999954,0.008987946,0.009536784],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007341598,0.000011834154,0.00036881215,0.00014837079,0.0000013491403,0.000136846,0.001462995,0.00010126001,0.00006734315,0.273081,0.7246079,0.000004866185],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014723383,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016081493,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021110302,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0050888606,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0039725546,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.070620954},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2496681289","doi":"10.1515/9783110869156.189","title":"Chapter V: THE INUIT CASE SYSTEM","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Geography","score_opus":0.049625965496093626,"score_gpt":0.2662628924672199,"score_spread":0.21663692697112627,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2496681289","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0018464692,0.0061746105,0.0021473567,0.0069577675,0.00075388985,0.00006229368,0.000084256026,0.000027021862,0.9819464],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.09012214,0.009850018,0.0030698166,0.009877132,0.0010259275,0.00027584727,0.00025539988,0.00013004131,0.8853936],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99934155,0.00024056202,0.000026919797,0.00007501829,0.00018678933,0.00012909518],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995758,0.0002478999,0.000017709572,0.000027828564,0.00009535797,0.00003541112],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007945563,0.00049738743,0.0003945348,0.0012332669,0.0047261347,0.006104915,0.0019075087,0.0030471366,0.032018907],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018490595,0.00030915166,0.0003847026,0.001556256,0.0033274672,0.0036049988,0.0016591769,0.0034681598,0.003850826],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000026741352,0.000021424432,0.00007337256,0.000040073315,0.0000016979626,0.00011199359,0.0010090421,0.00011168726,0.000052620202,0.895263,0.09112194,0.012190551],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003952936,0.000008236301,0.0003851253,0.00036673222,0.000005556588,0.00029586226,0.0019932347,0.00033327818,0.00018392735,0.21548748,0.7809246,0.000011946935],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02850893,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.052587125,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.032018907,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004376914,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003639315,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1071139},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2498007034","doi":"10.1017/cbo9781139179058.007","title":"Jurisdiction, questions of law and discretion","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Discretion; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.023312813315991016,"score_gpt":0.24101215694511388,"score_spread":0.21769934362912285,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2498007034","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007066131,0.10941085,0.007715901,0.0369566,0.0005555139,0.000018539764,0.00012785253,0.000048388938,0.8381002],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7471453,0.03277117,0.005229621,0.0062626707,0.0023947314,0.0002055546,0.00014857708,0.00014624026,0.20569614],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980167,0.0011533466,0.00006815377,0.00022191367,0.00033294383,0.00020695462],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99769187,0.00180162,0.00009624399,0.0001934583,0.00014238828,0.0000744777],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025567622,0.00056060794,0.0008160671,0.0012650471,0.0031768235,0.010502953,0.0013872848,0.0050234874,0.010535348],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006458167,0.0006661859,0.0003151955,0.0023145094,0.025443524,0.009119663,0.0016289621,0.004851465,0.0015037567],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000026643304,0.0000033696806,0.00002723961,0.000011451391,0.0000012027073,0.000008023025,0.00042269178,0.000053027314,0.000017665112,0.99386036,0.0041342615,0.0014580705],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005800514,0.000001962808,0.00011450421,0.00005682643,0.000002013625,0.000018550443,0.0004788865,0.00011370039,0.000024688477,0.9470301,0.052149277,0.000003782174],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012797698,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017107576,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012797698,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0053112176,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035377382,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.038535774},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2498487130","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511493973.030","title":"Summary Conclusions: family unity, expert roundtable, Geneva, November 2001","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tribunal; Refugee; Immigration; Political science; Law; Sociology; Gender studies; Library science","score_opus":0.05609457059006314,"score_gpt":0.2680530958322753,"score_spread":0.21195852524221218,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2498487130","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0041749254,0.10460851,0.0017789358,0.2267088,0.08050753,0.0015220522,0.00517103,0.0003580471,0.5751703],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.014414544,0.017985895,0.00064935203,0.026324987,0.004267188,0.0008108042,0.0016876804,0.00020268906,0.93365693],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99891126,0.00028754197,0.000073181356,0.00014938266,0.0003102681,0.0002682157],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99874973,0.00041708432,0.00008002113,0.00005544477,0.00032773605,0.0003699783],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031440747,0.0012466979,0.00044761485,0.0014002142,0.0050581526,0.005404083,0.0019609316,0.0084498245,0.06875919],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003480949,0.0006362885,0.0004294559,0.0019121123,0.0013445844,0.0036076647,0.0029195664,0.0054759807,0.015011927],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018119606,0.00001381154,0.00007647133,0.00011713214,9.583543e-7,0.0001095278,0.0008747475,0.000057147416,0.000062843574,0.003019936,0.9847915,0.010857796],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000063899606,0.000009618171,0.0010023287,0.0003228016,0.000001098779,0.000040805073,0.001460239,0.0000125596025,0.00005310922,0.000677809,0.9964042,0.000009055379],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04064796,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06548629,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06875919,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006783192,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006470757,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23002237},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2500566902","doi":"10.1007/978-90-6704-607-7_3","title":"The Globalisation of the Law and the Work of the Supreme Court of Canada","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Hague Academic Press, an imprint of T.M.C. Asser Press eBooks","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Globalization; Political science; Work (physics); Engineering; Mechanical engineering","score_opus":0.026303526262341993,"score_gpt":0.26080547203470583,"score_spread":0.23450194577236383,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2500566902","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018913962,0.03950314,0.0012796173,0.059184596,0.0005994498,0.000032067725,0.0001770888,0.000042409767,0.8802675],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.755301,0.020373112,0.0013441312,0.007370068,0.00026185886,0.000040396622,0.00011789248,0.00009803408,0.21509345],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99656963,0.00040869438,0.000045145483,0.00030508227,0.0012138766,0.0014575114],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998434,0.00041280658,0.00006810663,0.0000854136,0.0005894511,0.000410297],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016328645,0.00045731635,0.00035197826,0.0018021916,0.015435013,0.009967873,0.0013596254,0.0036000332,0.0089313425],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004800449,0.0003894691,0.00030289398,0.0039973194,0.021783153,0.0025566868,0.0028580746,0.004652943,0.0005626978],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008673246,0.0000043834402,0.00078372506,0.000028116168,0.0000061225714,0.00013629826,0.0068467683,0.00044594132,0.000051939867,0.92812717,0.048519917,0.015040957],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001309181,0.000008582773,0.0075290184,0.00042288762,0.000019049543,0.00014698581,0.01288758,0.0007203868,0.0001332698,0.20721786,0.770858,0.00004332405],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98062634,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99338853,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09800625,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09800625,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.16840532,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7110884},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W250370597","doi":"","title":"Extraterritorial Enforcement of Pipeda: A Multi-Tiered Analysis","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"˜The œGeorge Washington international law review","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statute; Personally identifiable information; Law; Business; Enforcement; Privacy law; Possession (linguistics); European union; Population; Law enforcement; Directive; Information privacy; Political science; Privacy policy; Sociology","score_opus":0.031117268261724635,"score_gpt":0.3390862629733977,"score_spread":0.3079689947116731,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W250370597","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6274482,0.007459243,0.03674021,0.015927626,0.00027632463,0.0021762368,0.0069293524,0.0003781671,0.30266464],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98208237,0.00088371,0.003145033,0.0015098872,0.00013072613,0.00017399779,0.0008574451,0.000057925277,0.011158897],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97173125,0.007484401,0.0012734516,0.0028261058,0.009114182,0.007570643],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.88395375,0.058150362,0.022551648,0.008481732,0.02363359,0.0032289643],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.025657617,0.000637956,0.0012079932,0.005699132,0.003800138,0.009818811,0.00459505,0.002900528,0.027916044],"category_scores_gemma":[0.057459004,0.0007905663,0.0031548578,0.00718879,0.00497774,0.006248503,0.004979493,0.0033013143,0.0014690456],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00055673247,0.00057323015,0.41189966,0.00072929455,0.0007261943,0.001221925,0.0044488763,0.008310972,0.00070544396,0.49891433,0.017056994,0.05485635],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018653755,0.0009224024,0.68988574,0.0015431733,0.0026666468,0.0010923209,0.024195472,0.0641164,0.0019462162,0.13432914,0.07882136,0.00029459607],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.19430543,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.12885717,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8056946,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012957121,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014891883,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38634884},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2503855069","doi":"10.1515/9783866537200.2.343","title":"RECOGNITION AND ENFORCEMENT OF FOREIGN JUDGMENTS IN QUEBEC","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Yearbook of Private International Law","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Enforcement; Psychology; Political science; Criminology; Law","score_opus":0.037764118086684666,"score_gpt":0.2832049070119058,"score_spread":0.24544078892522114,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2503855069","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13340734,0.018506465,0.0034181003,0.041521385,0.0010001435,0.00020495003,0.0009393149,0.00013799855,0.8008642],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.51817495,0.0038094737,0.0013287211,0.0028378519,0.00010052393,0.000060358638,0.00020088343,0.000054055003,0.47343323],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99776375,0.00047918144,0.00007160194,0.00023138842,0.0006205641,0.00083349214],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99770844,0.0006242948,0.00012547596,0.00011166792,0.0011347563,0.00029529756],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021566902,0.00031790286,0.00033513474,0.0015013481,0.012884241,0.00690772,0.001751341,0.002447607,0.016050326],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005499152,0.00043169488,0.00027054801,0.0025490555,0.0043329666,0.0015121526,0.0011682393,0.0029744105,0.00072078616],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006574695,0.00013048423,0.014683482,0.000094565876,0.000033232744,0.000868639,0.027806489,0.0021231342,0.00055764476,0.52278364,0.26962304,0.16122994],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023525601,0.000032686898,0.049358524,0.0003010981,0.000026299676,0.00017725815,0.01866153,0.0027164086,0.0005746627,0.014605958,0.9134186,0.00010351749],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9946026,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99755245,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.080044515,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.080044515,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.10638738,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5807663},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2509239612","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511894879.005","title":"Truth and reconciliation","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Sociology","score_opus":0.0359412574369504,"score_gpt":0.23028920706661696,"score_spread":0.19434794962966656,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2509239612","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0039349864,0.03204011,0.021123134,0.046201915,0.0016865864,0.000052662785,0.000115211864,0.00009769953,0.89474773],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.702063,0.015672669,0.0174317,0.011567557,0.0032028097,0.0004607434,0.00029526002,0.0003389382,0.24896723],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99084187,0.0063296678,0.0002725406,0.0008294906,0.0012065254,0.00051987916],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9950452,0.0032761728,0.00021116996,0.0009278656,0.00041304517,0.0001265908],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008920574,0.0007864079,0.0012562316,0.0021880122,0.004986976,0.013304406,0.0018499276,0.0063907607,0.017774612],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015704902,0.0006637476,0.0004664428,0.0021603578,0.03627134,0.016403094,0.0053653773,0.0066051167,0.0028639908],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000035602452,0.0000037267805,0.000012000792,0.000014916949,0.0000019632462,0.000009501976,0.000871354,0.0000613806,0.000010795734,0.98913413,0.005822193,0.004054368],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000061458964,0.0000030414672,0.000028811979,0.00007006231,0.0000022011325,0.000018287272,0.00047242973,0.00010957734,0.000039943647,0.941875,0.057370283,0.0000043134646],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0044861524,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004880023,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017774612,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0060989955,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0044547655,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05946201},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W251917808","doi":"","title":"The Deconstitutionalization of Canadian Private International Law","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University; York University","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Jurisprudence; Jurisdiction; Political science; Federalism; Spar; Foundation (evidence); Constitutional law; Original jurisdiction; Engineering","score_opus":0.010673002006720658,"score_gpt":0.266383159811213,"score_spread":0.25571015780449236,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W251917808","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.026757568,0.003133716,0.0049934336,0.12764347,0.0011072126,0.000058864047,0.0004737301,0.000106881256,0.83572507],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.78831774,0.0031269777,0.0061241784,0.042856675,0.0005847573,0.00010549982,0.0003551242,0.00023032402,0.15829879],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9882847,0.0011265482,0.00022610583,0.0013527244,0.0053403084,0.0036695858],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9907246,0.0020727695,0.00029489494,0.00082436256,0.004950215,0.0011331976],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0045619933,0.0005616136,0.0007201278,0.0036349727,0.026236594,0.017151315,0.0032406775,0.007728982,0.010518942],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022491414,0.0007534412,0.00087848265,0.004688024,0.027206304,0.005145398,0.004637565,0.012809836,0.0006873869],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000035965154,0.0000027516464,0.00012767065,0.000008488246,0.0000027839385,0.000022034754,0.0012666944,0.00013240219,0.00003004077,0.9842142,0.011544208,0.0026451794],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000034161043,0.000011744315,0.004257716,0.00023527427,0.000038377537,0.000094099385,0.0044532097,0.0013940411,0.00035496213,0.39119938,0.5978163,0.00011073732],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98602563,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9902507,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13144898,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13144898,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.20896019,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9537336},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2520981256","doi":"10.3138/uram.26.3.210","title":"Domestic Relations Law: Searching For Ultimate Reality In A Penultimate World","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ultimate Reality and Meaning","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.06958529394636921,"score_gpt":0.3884197617582988,"score_spread":0.3188344678119296,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2520981256","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.087271675,0.0070680617,0.06843411,0.081177875,0.00041209516,0.00007878832,0.00009741954,0.0000752782,0.75538474],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9810688,0.00089106226,0.006776517,0.0017701962,0.000101449084,0.000109611145,0.000030564217,0.000030035573,0.009221774],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99131703,0.006423663,0.00018537235,0.00068408326,0.0006993201,0.0006904919],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.990664,0.0064855944,0.00058259204,0.00082458893,0.0007653519,0.0006778279],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009113973,0.00041044457,0.00087390625,0.0028613843,0.013006942,0.02169947,0.0026706972,0.008566945,0.0071505783],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020175375,0.00053172733,0.0005647202,0.0034934545,0.075508565,0.027459694,0.009628363,0.007865331,0.00059351185],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000014879306,0.0000032453368,0.000065766784,0.000004904122,6.760757e-7,0.000022865557,0.0049371384,0.000025109237,0.000009038963,0.9936866,0.0003838192,0.00085931673],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004942482,0.000006301955,0.0001566894,0.000064905,0.0000037555908,0.0000742708,0.016965909,0.0003023804,0.00006936202,0.9650687,0.017274937,0.000007728485],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005266005,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0054333536,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02169947,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007289802,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006399893,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.052891433},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2521522969","doi":"10.7202/1069159ar","title":"MARTTI KOSKENNIEMI, FROM APOLOGY TO UTOPIA: THE STRUCTURE OF INTERNATIONAL LEGAL ARGUMENT (REISSUE WITH NEW EPILOGUE) (CAMBRIDGE: CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS, 2005) – UNITING PRAGMATISM AND THEORY IN INTERNATIONAL LEGAL SCHOLARSHIP: KOSKENNIEMI’S FROM APOLOGY TO UTOPIA REVISITED","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue québécoise de droit international","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Utopia; Pragmatism; Scholarship; Argument (complex analysis); Political science; International law; Law; Philosophy; Sociology; Epistemology","score_opus":0.0074616482203067064,"score_gpt":0.24250518285114167,"score_spread":0.23504353463083497,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2521522969","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0029950936,0.46325228,0.003482686,0.46885702,0.0056346813,0.000036122812,0.00015571048,0.000038288777,0.055548176],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.28517208,0.41464117,0.011689221,0.18733852,0.024069108,0.00040631442,0.00035755138,0.00029462215,0.0760314],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99707675,0.0012535534,0.0001509608,0.00031687962,0.0008559811,0.00034585074],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961067,0.0025518362,0.00039765736,0.00016798632,0.0005122206,0.00026352407],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042450004,0.0013587311,0.00095816486,0.0038743475,0.0075353314,0.008858865,0.0033648068,0.011119224,0.0064747403],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009587522,0.0007156518,0.00057473494,0.0042924103,0.02602533,0.035362843,0.00403971,0.011397565,0.0012300899],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031065163,0.000030433761,0.00036301735,0.00024833274,0.000014494392,0.0002116563,0.014031408,0.00008754201,0.00012024992,0.649393,0.31810546,0.017363306],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000035691857,0.000016447551,0.002343271,0.00087136345,0.000014106222,0.00028869862,0.008507807,0.00020922525,0.0002451903,0.5093595,0.47805077,0.00005784466],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04987461,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10417996,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04987461,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010179415,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008781474,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0991686},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2522136545","doi":"","title":"Forum clauses in carriage contracts after the Brussels I (bis) Regulation: procedural (un)certainty?","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS)","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Carriage; Certainty; Business; Medicine; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.029104283565256624,"score_gpt":0.289059362778737,"score_spread":0.2599550792134804,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2522136545","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.30222112,0.009327106,0.0287187,0.028971646,0.0008844287,0.00018913831,0.00045796952,0.00016711291,0.6290627],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96403605,0.001225346,0.0030683284,0.0029443284,0.00040218298,0.00008226795,0.00011629556,0.00004683903,0.028078357],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98782533,0.0028844706,0.0006073977,0.0015673803,0.0048864717,0.0022288738],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.988123,0.007412448,0.0018019835,0.00095312967,0.001236926,0.00047242866],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008251555,0.0003272166,0.00045773966,0.0013050801,0.004190939,0.011970123,0.0016543904,0.008292058,0.010567287],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03484768,0.0005907732,0.00057472754,0.0015029924,0.008078409,0.007830301,0.0041518766,0.006672625,0.0010012358],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023881415,0.000018852663,0.00085794344,0.000022613574,0.0000037534085,0.0002459279,0.0019195838,0.00024504363,0.00021834805,0.9875567,0.0022858786,0.006601402],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009678624,0.00023303174,0.01753232,0.0011063651,0.000070060756,0.0007484253,0.0057029715,0.0036469442,0.0023875288,0.7146066,0.25359252,0.0002764013],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.033870403,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.032507665,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.033870403,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0067604147,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006081029,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06734651},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2529410267","doi":"10.3138/9781442679368-005","title":"3. The Metis Land Grant","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of Toronto Press eBooks","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Metis; Land grant; Geography; Political science; Computer science; World Wide Web; Public administration","score_opus":0.022168247374900186,"score_gpt":0.22674623768589186,"score_spread":0.20457799031099166,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2529410267","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0011022899,0.014412963,0.00035433556,0.023919957,0.002362505,0.00005600191,0.000837864,0.00010179879,0.95685226],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0067229727,0.0018290766,0.0001351901,0.0022665767,0.00017235035,0.000029650544,0.00009847376,0.00004141255,0.98870426],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993716,0.00007040648,0.000021356173,0.000076643606,0.0002605064,0.00019950244],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99961567,0.00007377692,0.000021818172,0.00003747657,0.00017247823,0.00007885393],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00056855154,0.00061663147,0.0003899602,0.0011321909,0.005104417,0.0046650427,0.0009366411,0.0055114403,0.097287744],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019992667,0.00054676435,0.0002868713,0.0016898062,0.001451856,0.0018835121,0.0016453376,0.0034997067,0.019948179],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010412168,0.00000868232,0.00015248901,0.000049479873,0.0000013762065,0.00006390434,0.00052942167,0.000045788165,0.000052655785,0.13200828,0.8475969,0.01948053],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000024374176,0.0000019665663,0.00038158562,0.000032326327,0.0000011700804,0.000012977926,0.00015443884,0.00001410577,0.000019060715,0.0016939101,0.99768305,0.0000028576255],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.44262895,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8007593,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.557371,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008758924,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010731836,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.88010514},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2529422895","doi":"10.3138/9781442688469-007","title":"5. The Canada Land Law Amendment Association","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of Toronto Press eBooks","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Amendment; Law; Association (psychology); Political science; Psychology","score_opus":0.015973938374644028,"score_gpt":0.20490929150163698,"score_spread":0.18893535312699294,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2529422895","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0018031942,0.012516451,0.0005468862,0.024928624,0.001997506,0.00013162447,0.0027070625,0.0001614745,0.9552071],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.013847396,0.0023738625,0.0004967015,0.014908276,0.00026397235,0.00008760684,0.00034175388,0.00008006966,0.9676003],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99618334,0.0003058646,0.00010385769,0.00027190338,0.0019247218,0.0012101553],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99728477,0.00047769785,0.00007099146,0.00015041999,0.0017382968,0.0002778437],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018246553,0.0010325541,0.00081960834,0.0038072714,0.015579061,0.009791395,0.0027488035,0.015354473,0.056345135],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0056992886,0.0014286675,0.00087734667,0.0044652694,0.003860845,0.0032496897,0.0019353485,0.00947366,0.013325142],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010611995,0.000029749022,0.00028343868,0.000050652397,0.000003744969,0.000058031135,0.00068366266,0.0000966183,0.00005488291,0.15850766,0.82930434,0.010916708],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006224335,0.0000038658427,0.0014193426,0.00010054894,0.000007891262,0.000017495946,0.0003549893,0.00006649562,0.000067505614,0.004854987,0.9930808,0.000019947029],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9652013,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9920183,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.056345135,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.048117165,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.10090754,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3491161},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2530229452","doi":"10.7202/1100736ar","title":"La pratique judiciaire du droit international privé au Québec en 1997","year":2023,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue québécoise de droit international","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.01243789447304568,"score_gpt":0.2783358277303122,"score_spread":0.2658979332572665,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2530229452","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11269263,0.109313585,0.0039260895,0.18743531,0.004307847,0.00017876519,0.0026878929,0.00018416246,0.57927364],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.41481367,0.015154922,0.0014612229,0.015696406,0.00033145063,0.000103109785,0.00055553345,0.000059256043,0.5518244],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978796,0.00021222902,0.00006053807,0.00019563745,0.0009592656,0.00069270725],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978668,0.00037126298,0.00014131887,0.000055142544,0.0012386207,0.00032684326],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001371204,0.00036407966,0.0002841536,0.00090125523,0.008326969,0.0050224867,0.0008479212,0.00270396,0.009885771],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0043929224,0.0002832626,0.00023480513,0.0018738883,0.0028236532,0.0012078523,0.0009722299,0.004320188,0.0006112864],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007879857,0.000049052684,0.011325679,0.00016515085,0.000032062733,0.00081458193,0.014831186,0.0010023151,0.00072926027,0.43509853,0.4677254,0.06814803],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017358316,0.000017000075,0.020294685,0.00021652988,0.000016231008,0.00012528119,0.0034081945,0.00037824144,0.00042555816,0.002528452,0.9725336,0.000038959788],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9921813,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9947241,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.085671246,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.085671246,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.082630776,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6215913},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2532314227","doi":"","title":"Territorial Disputes and the Shifting Identity of Japan","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Identity (music); Political science; History; Genealogy; Aesthetics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.032591856113246456,"score_gpt":0.3245524393858084,"score_spread":0.29196058327256197,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2532314227","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9410793,0.0007021491,0.00038173253,0.001844956,0.000054602468,0.00000837118,0.000013789744,0.0000021418216,0.05591285],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99887854,0.0000882221,0.00005583628,0.00005814782,0.00000701783,0.0000036616457,0.0000040092273,0.0000011118442,0.0009033745],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99750155,0.0007099183,0.00014077895,0.00028646932,0.00025523666,0.0011060297],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998478,0.00026997906,0.00046399288,0.00012098993,0.00021136443,0.00045564637],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020803546,0.00017903771,0.00036197205,0.0017536108,0.0124123525,0.0073646256,0.0007535262,0.0015200191,0.0026747761],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0038403836,0.00022820619,0.00022508195,0.0024120926,0.0152439475,0.0037017514,0.005964593,0.0015950471,0.00015081772],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020859855,0.00006485554,0.05343328,0.00008441802,0.000047992122,0.0015441476,0.4434119,0.0004995274,0.0013279363,0.47982934,0.0020638015,0.017484091],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000058598343,0.00009884647,0.11599589,0.0001584177,0.00011007662,0.0004946752,0.6744912,0.0011361334,0.00042183846,0.11991705,0.087002054,0.00011517573],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.041104242,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.059687003,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.041104242,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004549978,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0042347293,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08173001},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2538423588","doi":"10.1093/he/9780198752844.003.0009","title":"9. Exemption clauses","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Notice; Legislature; Law; Legislative intent; Freedom of contract; Interpretation (philosophy); Law and economics; Common law; Exclusion clause; Political science; Business; Economics; Contract management; Computer science","score_opus":0.04088603709561555,"score_gpt":0.2545576212885471,"score_spread":0.21367158419293153,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2538423588","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002817941,0.0034351326,0.014423661,0.0037312002,0.0010744524,0.0001365261,0.00034373457,0.0001141517,0.9739232],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.19801994,0.0077557527,0.038354475,0.019902993,0.00331297,0.0011588366,0.0016798973,0.0006226828,0.7291925],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9905261,0.0017106406,0.0007078271,0.0010687431,0.0049806014,0.0010061123],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9956358,0.0019424999,0.000357466,0.0007841564,0.0011390665,0.00014103613],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004799169,0.00072496734,0.0007080292,0.0015026368,0.0043808827,0.008180328,0.0024329026,0.0058528204,0.029835967],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010221031,0.0007527375,0.0011406764,0.0014642015,0.006199993,0.006974422,0.0037757938,0.008838452,0.016991688],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000041497906,0.000007794539,0.00004511884,0.000033778306,0.0000010442621,0.000028246497,0.0003906278,0.000041611427,0.00011155343,0.9858453,0.007273067,0.0062177717],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008685523,0.000016468448,0.00024331351,0.00033922427,0.000004899806,0.00019461573,0.00025281933,0.00012723301,0.0005942487,0.19920887,0.7989879,0.000021635045],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0069463574,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005610377,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029835967,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003016617,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003988471,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.099811256},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2553277544","doi":"10.3917/rcdip.161.0051","title":"Le forum non conveniens en droit civil","year":2016,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue critique de droit international privé","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Choice of law; Humanities; Law; Conflict of laws; Philosophy","score_opus":0.01018021799764261,"score_gpt":0.28488523593729426,"score_spread":0.27470501793965163,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2553277544","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01365653,0.011640451,0.0035040379,0.3707063,0.006162098,0.000035317713,0.000078763864,0.000048006485,0.59416854],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.61886275,0.0040680245,0.0020650052,0.07220373,0.0076875133,0.0002221551,0.000067035726,0.000254285,0.2945695],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9825591,0.009227567,0.00036503913,0.0017248155,0.0035121646,0.0026113398],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9859569,0.009840564,0.00060952053,0.0011118056,0.0015683989,0.000912801],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014131274,0.0008439622,0.0011316705,0.0017108952,0.014835243,0.019677637,0.0027362213,0.032290157,0.015403753],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03400327,0.00063863036,0.0009747131,0.0016400901,0.024881182,0.012731971,0.007247868,0.027699292,0.0018579104],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007845904,0.000007291557,0.00004006503,0.000012083054,0.00000182498,0.000032426407,0.0021479325,0.00003377758,0.000048661655,0.98070234,0.015394727,0.001571124],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003338177,0.00001938755,0.0004326102,0.0002747066,0.000007542132,0.00010803889,0.0052716713,0.00023321497,0.00017873898,0.27481863,0.7185936,0.00002844843],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024738751,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02428658,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.032290157,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011870127,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011773176,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08612424},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2561025339","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198728689.013.18","title":"Roman Courts and Private Arbitration","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Arbitration; Arbiter; Publicity; Mediation; Adjudication; Political science; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.022266278392846343,"score_gpt":0.22940283366296163,"score_spread":0.2071365552701153,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2561025339","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0049514296,0.006145363,0.00412377,0.0036645194,0.00017921487,0.000019493451,0.000020053041,0.000018611074,0.9808775],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6924964,0.006999086,0.006062255,0.00319914,0.0005547353,0.00017496072,0.00007327232,0.000081586666,0.2903585],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99400395,0.0035600073,0.00018489992,0.00041448275,0.0013737706,0.00046294136],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983583,0.0009865293,0.00010462533,0.00025938888,0.00022941716,0.00006172189],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004040249,0.00032093743,0.00044313926,0.0012324079,0.0039826613,0.0063544232,0.00081078894,0.0019425997,0.013762388],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0051418743,0.0002822229,0.00034531773,0.0014987291,0.015784176,0.0038072856,0.0035051305,0.0036393604,0.0018452061],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000016467375,0.0000034253171,0.000024028343,0.000012057243,6.46093e-7,0.0000141272585,0.00062364916,0.00007203765,0.000012900473,0.9932318,0.00196323,0.0040405705],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012081125,0.000015597472,0.00026336656,0.00039722206,0.0000037809866,0.00011264343,0.0012011788,0.0010145404,0.00022737893,0.64022195,0.35651985,0.000010417173],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0022613746,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0024235777,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013762388,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0049103755,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028036518,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04603976},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2566536109","doi":"10.7202/1038259ar","title":"La méthode conflictuelle dans le projet de code civil camerounais : contribution à la systématisation de l’évolution des méthodes en droit international privé","year":2016,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.016514232589054555,"score_gpt":0.2773077953057261,"score_spread":0.26079356271667153,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2566536109","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08535547,0.0031333955,0.7729494,0.015232627,0.00088087353,0.0050362046,0.00085294177,0.0006371118,0.115922],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.29434264,0.0011752555,0.6723913,0.0006496093,0.00011489996,0.004171342,0.00047708055,0.0003409806,0.026336893],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.91485405,0.06734225,0.0039416254,0.0040702694,0.008297863,0.0014939707],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8717941,0.08031543,0.008085499,0.012963518,0.024600845,0.0022405412],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.062210433,0.0011634739,0.00073967763,0.008855244,0.0057978304,0.009789952,0.0031314117,0.002067366,0.012563813],"category_scores_gemma":[0.113708414,0.0008594479,0.0010961222,0.007899698,0.010605981,0.008229401,0.0066405903,0.0044298815,0.0015784573],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001204385,0.0001868091,0.0141164325,0.0011262706,0.00007430183,0.00021114181,0.08301066,0.0027231122,0.0015229507,0.5065105,0.0069753863,0.383422],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00014385517,0.00041319846,0.037984516,0.004685641,0.00012412686,0.00066730333,0.087672465,0.026378304,0.006776842,0.20889112,0.6259709,0.00029172446],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.053663462,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.055082522,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.062210433,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017597431,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.033702403,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3290041},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2566894245","doi":"","title":"Vienašaliai sandoriai paveldėjimo teisėje: valios išreiškimo forma ir teisinės pasekmės","year":2008,"lang":"lt","type":"article","venue":"Jurisprudencija","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Renunciation; Successor cardinal; Ecological succession; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Philosophy; Sociology; Mathematics; Theology","score_opus":0.03557778837050062,"score_gpt":0.29839088022680055,"score_spread":0.2628130918562999,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2566894245","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.069135204,0.11451495,0.006381602,0.04118403,0.01533173,0.00006956255,0.00030429434,0.00048165413,0.752597],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5507321,0.057345614,0.0044530146,0.0035536198,0.0055307103,0.00009724321,0.00031367422,0.00034896174,0.37762508],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988489,0.00036536332,0.00005011283,0.00021181814,0.0003419607,0.00018182799],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99938715,0.00021170847,0.00007821532,0.000057174184,0.00015761507,0.00010811536],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012148428,0.00053283735,0.00045040293,0.001006799,0.002361662,0.007051218,0.0005274304,0.0017493947,0.019367808],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023316739,0.00026029957,0.00028750187,0.0005747733,0.0018761606,0.0019271052,0.002784605,0.002849296,0.007676659],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00029222382,0.00025883698,0.0045509045,0.0013357475,0.0000428167,0.0023230957,0.0231514,0.0009992345,0.0044565513,0.44895542,0.17068428,0.3429495],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006009224,0.000042798987,0.002122782,0.0004318869,0.000010279008,0.0009077641,0.0025708626,0.00014217799,0.0009594443,0.008685922,0.9841023,0.00001780809],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014735472,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017756162,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019367808,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017995687,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022339022,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0647918},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2574434222","doi":"","title":"Family Maintenance Enforcement Act. : Canada. Province of B. C. 2002","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"神戸学院法学","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Enforcement; Business; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.010749480463000075,"score_gpt":0.24405926740811867,"score_spread":0.2333097869451186,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2574434222","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011944098,0.025413234,0.0011936651,0.03171073,0.0027614885,0.0008793514,0.30417603,0.00083395455,0.6210874],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.044086315,0.00940378,0.0023797974,0.0041626296,0.000103447645,0.0003757645,0.03607142,0.00019517081,0.90322155],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99853134,0.00008008623,0.00007577598,0.00008714029,0.00085439446,0.0003711688],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9945109,0.00021592528,0.00012466467,0.00011733699,0.00456357,0.0004675295],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00084285636,0.00087973074,0.0006228787,0.0021592428,0.0045106728,0.0025465593,0.0023828605,0.0015460484,0.051209632],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0037583192,0.0011731694,0.00043496268,0.0058966205,0.0008224412,0.0007683017,0.0006699696,0.0024706833,0.0111307325],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008120889,0.00006273266,0.0033572663,0.00016347799,0.000011111997,0.000057535115,0.00028354206,0.00018476423,0.00014441309,0.0037366906,0.96223456,0.029682644],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000059614475,0.000020727077,0.07927188,0.00040968932,0.000034975492,0.000047870886,0.00079563813,0.00025599197,0.00028160273,0.00042881363,0.9183567,0.000036480888],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9965417,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99854773,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05438849,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05438849,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12905289,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.39461797},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2581053164","doi":"","title":"After The Hague: Some Thoughts On The Impact On Canadian Law Of The Convention on Choice Of Court Agreements","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"NSUWorks (Nova Southeastern University)","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Convention; Political science; Choice of law; Conflict of laws","score_opus":0.022179899259934775,"score_gpt":0.2574662220360747,"score_spread":0.23528632277613995,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2581053164","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004640411,0.058599204,0.0014231052,0.64238304,0.010138063,0.000077385295,0.00043484027,0.000058964673,0.282245],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.25809848,0.06480445,0.00592656,0.3559657,0.005119305,0.00019417287,0.0004676236,0.00044388158,0.30897984],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98311526,0.0025398845,0.0005202097,0.0013661423,0.008304699,0.004153803],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9888297,0.0032899822,0.0003108994,0.0003447354,0.0061597107,0.0010650706],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01174985,0.0010756714,0.00090403104,0.0047923005,0.034352455,0.02475083,0.005885291,0.020319166,0.01921824],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025492769,0.00094445253,0.0013788228,0.008521594,0.029822651,0.015069797,0.0039955503,0.021833312,0.0014818643],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001871538,0.000019013783,0.00039511695,0.00008811115,0.000012795868,0.00015246093,0.007184855,0.00020206944,0.00010950153,0.69398683,0.28695917,0.010871401],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020635953,0.000009471428,0.0020964483,0.000488077,0.000020705165,0.000056001434,0.007512476,0.00017535558,0.0001618517,0.039826464,0.94946223,0.00017030053],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9920474,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.993601,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8303257,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.16967425,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.16770245,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9630602},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2583551081","doi":"10.1017/9781316681060.004","title":"Customary Norms <i>vs</i> State Law","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"State (computer science); Content (measure theory); Law; Political science; Computer science; Internet privacy; Computer security; Mathematics; Algorithm","score_opus":0.02465987583544364,"score_gpt":0.23503692008788662,"score_spread":0.210377044252443,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2583551081","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0008412949,0.006564358,0.0010829899,0.0043409793,0.00042356737,0.00000615444,0.00009981838,0.000042694093,0.98659813],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.13858502,0.015978988,0.002061521,0.0048315106,0.00087170495,0.000092820614,0.00036602194,0.00023937575,0.836973],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99941635,0.00018458192,0.000018287541,0.000060025242,0.00025470532,0.000066107285],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996176,0.00021889567,0.000026461117,0.000039727085,0.000071935225,0.000025357653],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006567154,0.0003422065,0.00021295293,0.0007419618,0.0014837555,0.0043562828,0.0005383226,0.0012891908,0.027462922],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015548029,0.00018907327,0.00018924875,0.0013357449,0.004839015,0.003423851,0.0009134106,0.0029020882,0.005441765],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000029888108,0.00000413146,0.000039237024,0.000029484581,7.055326e-7,0.000008393318,0.0006474751,0.00005208114,0.000038665457,0.9303455,0.055855546,0.012975766],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000023331586,0.0000038691273,0.0003181363,0.00024874997,0.0000022163886,0.000041116302,0.00085257867,0.00012723959,0.00014816817,0.27443147,0.72381717,0.0000069306975],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009522934,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016393011,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027462922,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003944515,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033982235,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09187263},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W25849069","doi":"10.1186/s12931-015-0201-y","title":"The Administration of Justice in Commercial Disputes / L'administration de la justice et les litiges commerciaux (M.Pilkington, J.M.Spence, H.Dumont, dir.)","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Administration (probate law); Economic Justice; Administration of justice; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.02396279633155077,"score_gpt":0.33312699498151305,"score_spread":0.30916419864996225,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W25849069","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0070564128,0.49279374,0.0006165381,0.41737562,0.017643059,0.000042181917,0.00016788852,0.000057684665,0.064246945],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.22628142,0.37299538,0.0024153483,0.056048013,0.03827698,0.00013812007,0.0003168503,0.00014097996,0.30338696],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99705744,0.0014175859,0.00016853871,0.0002210164,0.00053196674,0.0006034642],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965778,0.0018583884,0.00037363873,0.00007048714,0.0005681836,0.00055141974],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004706214,0.0005201081,0.00054183573,0.0015312028,0.003836715,0.0050722538,0.00070207234,0.007161788,0.016664555],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005250801,0.00033443669,0.0004140865,0.0012682937,0.0028666325,0.0027473583,0.001724413,0.005627834,0.0025067052],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009773565,0.00010288189,0.003070878,0.00040181936,0.000026815165,0.0005186398,0.0023804854,0.00011493756,0.00054980157,0.06523401,0.8017649,0.125737],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022804517,0.00006677808,0.014208527,0.00056249223,0.000017733975,0.00066649367,0.003208302,0.00023363785,0.00063887023,0.012258461,0.96807766,0.000038256723],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.034606226,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07639678,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.034606226,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036731025,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0052040825,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06880957},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2585497728","doi":"10.1017/9781316681060.011","title":"Grassroots Law in Context","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Grassroots; Context (archaeology); Law; Political science; Sociology; Law and economics; Geography; Archaeology; Politics","score_opus":0.036075958759389286,"score_gpt":0.2523282722211582,"score_spread":0.21625231346176893,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2585497728","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0013887404,0.019413676,0.0006401443,0.015399711,0.0009401367,0.000010350659,0.00005527329,0.000032036285,0.96212],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.21884085,0.024633653,0.0013349841,0.013687814,0.001407028,0.00006991001,0.00013347085,0.00014127638,0.73975104],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993845,0.00016944823,0.000010524596,0.00008707745,0.00021821442,0.00013023928],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99973994,0.000120721656,0.00001617982,0.000028038005,0.000045768797,0.00004931417],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007082917,0.0003763156,0.00030524968,0.000691024,0.0034765617,0.0051641115,0.00063626486,0.002064466,0.028619409],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016083391,0.00014786723,0.00017467537,0.0015394856,0.0070960014,0.0036416764,0.0018930247,0.0034385992,0.0035401832],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000018630669,0.000005069221,0.000049756065,0.00003588877,8.4739514e-7,0.000042539097,0.0013902761,0.00007765782,0.000036049103,0.89732605,0.08980567,0.011228299],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000018510622,0.0000027630163,0.00032302685,0.00025349835,0.0000012742673,0.00002992367,0.001428609,0.000066993605,0.000034428376,0.17581227,0.822042,0.0000034112934],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024077132,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.046433076,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028619409,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0068622404,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006057993,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09574145},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2587009173","doi":"","title":"A Distant Export: The New Zealand Experience with a North American Style Personal Property Security Regime","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"ResearchSpace (University of Auckland)","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Style (visual arts); Property (philosophy); Geography; Business; Economy; Political science; History; Economics; Archaeology","score_opus":0.014154367921714404,"score_gpt":0.2530403542025865,"score_spread":0.23888598628087213,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2587009173","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5381945,0.0016387661,0.0011804323,0.039248556,0.0005958698,0.00011244352,0.0000786142,0.000052863605,0.418898],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8039783,0.0028384593,0.0009041021,0.006863781,0.00013781592,0.000075783755,0.00009751804,0.00014907039,0.18495506],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9958313,0.0010785257,0.00013816652,0.00041288315,0.0012662318,0.0012729042],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99703985,0.000762162,0.0003785628,0.00028719794,0.00058578706,0.0009463628],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004852918,0.0003519942,0.00040508131,0.0005855974,0.021857755,0.0077294274,0.0012831368,0.0025845733,0.012518356],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0070816004,0.00044392416,0.00049630005,0.0016698343,0.014267178,0.006970707,0.006886063,0.007223337,0.0010656199],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012436319,0.00017091492,0.008899677,0.00019619334,0.000021976708,0.008932086,0.83342355,0.00017229322,0.0025049648,0.06720007,0.043966826,0.03438708],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002632184,0.00013435748,0.018240051,0.0001960175,0.00001821568,0.0018710499,0.37182832,0.00013136544,0.00037237408,0.0030279618,0.60406995,0.000083884544],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5615644,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7768871,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4384356,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016701555,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013380374,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8820353},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2593858148","doi":"","title":"Panel 6. Achieving Efficient and Effective Settlements Under the OSC's New No-Contest Settlement Scheme","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"CONTEST; Settlement (finance); Human settlement; Scheme (mathematics); Computer science; Geography; Mathematics; Political science; Archaeology; World Wide Web; Law","score_opus":0.05175315742170448,"score_gpt":0.3184664979056069,"score_spread":0.2667133404839024,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2593858148","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02078743,0.00047745983,0.00789503,0.044866074,0.0013665091,0.001092281,0.00097528036,0.00014118734,0.92239875],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2376298,0.00074124365,0.0112611065,0.021195075,0.00051450956,0.00057163666,0.0006662472,0.00010551258,0.7273149],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98386556,0.0012107367,0.0004369267,0.0010577004,0.008834482,0.0045946906],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.988765,0.0011219135,0.00034730663,0.0007137292,0.0071344497,0.0019176162],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007546406,0.00036738915,0.00035828614,0.000635816,0.012027143,0.008141003,0.0022043283,0.0065256576,0.029986491],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015147493,0.00045059103,0.0008640375,0.00056845834,0.004718642,0.0023260931,0.0039102947,0.005686829,0.0038966322],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006650001,0.00012384457,0.004680271,0.00018266005,0.000015529273,0.00039909105,0.0048958785,0.0012081644,0.00165636,0.4847637,0.46359617,0.038411796],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000050082646,0.000048227943,0.007390958,0.00012684433,0.000017976205,0.00011689159,0.0032204364,0.00048600617,0.0010483844,0.009628133,0.9778086,0.000057474495],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.71135426,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.89414734,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.71135426,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02233564,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07816148,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5806912},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2599096538","doi":"","title":"Intellectual Property: The Law in Canada Daniel Gervais & Elizabeth F. Judge (Toronto: Thomson Carswell, 2006)","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Property (philosophy); Law; Real property; Law and economics; History; Sociology; Political science; Philosophy; Epistemology","score_opus":0.014145441240156598,"score_gpt":0.24746705625402005,"score_spread":0.23332161501386345,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2599096538","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005967915,0.2059503,0.0015299784,0.35425198,0.0023837877,0.00007596653,0.0011482243,0.00008459304,0.42860723],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.21270315,0.15179275,0.0023362779,0.058967225,0.0017705235,0.000070746006,0.00044903567,0.0001514102,0.57175887],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99652535,0.00024601113,0.00008850068,0.00026410463,0.0020280844,0.0008479872],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971495,0.0005190906,0.0001264775,0.00008045651,0.0015213945,0.000603066],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018062545,0.00057735277,0.0005318056,0.0017511985,0.01862904,0.014405349,0.0018065873,0.008375751,0.013023261],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0055044377,0.00066571526,0.00036505488,0.0051002516,0.011692106,0.004279003,0.0019011336,0.006054098,0.001635114],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001093269,0.000014378398,0.0012482412,0.000074757416,0.000007972633,0.00021620121,0.0026261173,0.0003461584,0.000060676462,0.36405116,0.61079043,0.020552954],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000068676427,0.00000572142,0.0051748534,0.000411601,0.000016072845,0.00011047249,0.0039648246,0.0002713473,0.000107119966,0.03429103,0.95559496,0.000045138153],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9918194,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9971547,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08642598,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08642598,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.16229768,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6270673},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2601680162","doi":"10.54648/aila2013011","title":"Summary of MC99 Judicial Decisions 2012","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Air and Space Law","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Liability; Convention; Political science; China; Law; Judicial review; Judicial opinion","score_opus":0.017621990479683478,"score_gpt":0.282594284359484,"score_spread":0.26497229387980054,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2601680162","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016366223,0.037984516,0.0039672037,0.06148435,0.025395934,0.0015563464,0.028029863,0.0009992276,0.8242163],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.08449633,0.03386133,0.00874583,0.07977325,0.01631472,0.0012746564,0.015251985,0.0007469011,0.75953513],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9911033,0.0006572051,0.00048325708,0.0005393133,0.0059836814,0.001233383],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99154526,0.0023614594,0.0006011315,0.0003549143,0.004668665,0.00046843078],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005385814,0.0010401981,0.0007417222,0.009259545,0.007210522,0.008622271,0.0025412634,0.005251107,0.017383391],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014400698,0.00084014854,0.0017042876,0.007705043,0.0013212312,0.0013263115,0.0013269794,0.0058984677,0.008308963],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000051000006,0.000058292626,0.00034907565,0.00029257263,0.000029818399,0.00029039936,0.00028525252,0.00044552475,0.00065754965,0.020495914,0.9455605,0.031484094],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015280622,0.000031707063,0.0045870864,0.00036376997,0.000042249416,0.00006193985,0.00014879214,0.00019631612,0.0009771298,0.0014376944,0.99209255,0.000045469795],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.17421092,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.31743455,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17421092,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014862078,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019110985,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34639376},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2604224154","doi":"","title":"Commercial Free Speech – A Critical Reconsideration","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Doctrine; Commercial speech; Supreme court; Proportionality (law); Political science; Free speech; Law; Constitutional law; European union; Law and economics; Sociology; First amendment; Business; International trade","score_opus":0.02024164898825469,"score_gpt":0.31915758254302684,"score_spread":0.29891593355477214,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2604224154","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005964503,0.047468357,0.0058081774,0.8440371,0.013613385,0.00003499495,0.000047929327,0.00003540422,0.08299021],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5005542,0.047884587,0.005576794,0.34529716,0.062359285,0.0002604866,0.00007914114,0.00026651102,0.03772179],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9822251,0.009441408,0.0007528887,0.0028596495,0.0036004288,0.0011204857],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9600507,0.03346536,0.00081693055,0.0012993045,0.0035675394,0.0008001257],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02029743,0.00090707507,0.0011897626,0.0027279258,0.009947988,0.019223494,0.0055028303,0.021964014,0.0036891673],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027165597,0.0004940717,0.000996573,0.0020036784,0.06946038,0.03350652,0.006100644,0.031328395,0.00092908525],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000054193,0.0000047010294,0.000033378987,0.000041441854,0.0000020146754,0.00007913907,0.0040047565,0.000041007504,0.000033964883,0.98032516,0.012117167,0.003311904],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013918249,0.000021039614,0.00014474768,0.0006443887,0.0000073462193,0.00021491887,0.010660869,0.00037649908,0.00020057893,0.56802964,0.4196546,0.00003146524],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010792425,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007913845,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021964014,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012347713,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009408327,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10734433},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2605620558","doi":"","title":"Chronique de droit international privé canadien (2010-2015): Droit civil québécois (1re partie)","year":2016,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Journal du droit international","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.011501177208589461,"score_gpt":0.26523336973458317,"score_spread":0.2537321925259937,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2605620558","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.50565445,0.03691653,0.0015744441,0.015899928,0.0019090123,0.00032162273,0.31227094,0.00072750263,0.1247255],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.76427513,0.014608078,0.0015453163,0.0016425854,0.00033362108,0.000301257,0.07609285,0.00013519097,0.14106596],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99867624,0.000056438486,0.00008925639,0.00016715046,0.00039006787,0.0006208355],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969536,0.00019590714,0.0006204524,0.000062403575,0.0014909288,0.00067662937],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008024207,0.00063697505,0.00056979223,0.006626664,0.0025691788,0.0036354857,0.0010921332,0.0009804388,0.025276875],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002905435,0.0004855259,0.0008870232,0.008734399,0.001014933,0.001725681,0.0015980257,0.0026206905,0.0015484861],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00059485814,0.00018390961,0.41491807,0.0018539102,0.00055314996,0.00091966026,0.008038064,0.0029099586,0.0010385885,0.029542303,0.44099477,0.098452814],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016529828,0.000027242815,0.7533844,0.0005771587,0.000044957807,0.00021454657,0.0052494607,0.000448202,0.00023997776,0.00024058683,0.23951097,0.000045944354],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98335844,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99063677,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.033442646,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.033442646,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.037773233,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24264449},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2605904935","doi":"","title":"LibGuides: Authorised Law Reports: What are Authorised Reports?","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"libguides","venue":"","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Internet privacy; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.040484555912580815,"score_gpt":0.32408001643743467,"score_spread":0.28359546052485385,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2605904935","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.034766067,0.037190422,0.004339666,0.10740216,0.0058457106,0.0006982148,0.050917454,0.0025171307,0.75632316],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.26094675,0.053630162,0.016838478,0.016267292,0.0034623651,0.0014556709,0.041562248,0.002417169,0.6034199],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97546965,0.0069977366,0.0034723734,0.0008216114,0.012170378,0.0010681881],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8469786,0.057882458,0.017470412,0.005019234,0.0687523,0.0038969722],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01757378,0.00040557206,0.00045877422,0.013955677,0.0028179018,0.016437996,0.0014830692,0.0034184956,0.031308807],"category_scores_gemma":[0.14489733,0.0006395028,0.00023323945,0.02194348,0.002279156,0.008835133,0.0025311173,0.0020094996,0.012489512],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000608775,0.000039296134,0.009868012,0.0009908,0.000009369448,0.00020892973,0.0076435995,0.000087536864,0.0002132082,0.04842567,0.8168117,0.115641],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009209927,0.000010241897,0.014596618,0.0014055219,0.000008218788,0.00019269777,0.0052054683,0.00015956737,0.00032956217,0.0028172983,0.9752206,0.000044917564],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.090010725,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.069909506,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.090010725,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00736955,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.022753833,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17897362},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2610771774","doi":"10.2307/j.ctt1w1vmdn.13","title":"United States Participation in Drafting Paris Convention 1919","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"MQUP eBooks","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"International Air Transport Association","funders":"","keywords":"Convention; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.048592260297859936,"score_gpt":0.3406177031735707,"score_spread":0.29202544287571075,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2610771774","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002949077,0.007029047,0.0015354005,0.010346343,0.0030991745,0.000053369316,0.000121183315,0.00006043397,0.97480583],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.12934846,0.0100746155,0.0046995003,0.0109518645,0.0015620039,0.0002223198,0.00042394418,0.00015846593,0.84255886],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967776,0.0012962169,0.00013231249,0.00034129713,0.0009529134,0.0004996675],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991003,0.00039505778,0.000052665448,0.000064170876,0.00031957545,0.000068304464],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0043294975,0.00072603935,0.00033403648,0.0016026892,0.0057212044,0.008472123,0.001072923,0.003891731,0.013899627],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004464246,0.00031933663,0.00053694414,0.0015606455,0.0061853994,0.002734005,0.0028215782,0.0063689123,0.0035795285],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000092943665,0.000011482518,0.00009234865,0.000038020255,0.0000034208142,0.00010113867,0.0034490242,0.00022953805,0.00011046375,0.87730646,0.10515415,0.01349467],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000030048277,0.0000069569332,0.00016240143,0.00010204184,0.0000019396668,0.000027892109,0.00047481703,0.00004641874,0.0001474432,0.014948728,0.98406917,0.000009189565],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0571441,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.049214456,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0571441,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01641092,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010511064,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11907011},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2610894389","doi":"10.34961/19056","title":"Legislative comment: family property division under the Family Law Act 2011","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Limerick Institutional Repository (University of Limerick)","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Division (mathematics); Legislature; Property (philosophy); Law; Legislative history; Family law; Law and economics; Political science; Business; Sociology; Philosophy; Mathematics; Arithmetic","score_opus":0.03595816700906779,"score_gpt":0.24571314538606848,"score_spread":0.2097549783770007,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2610894389","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.024181213,0.0035773378,0.0007521473,0.76978844,0.011759865,0.00031870435,0.0028187225,0.00031960438,0.18648392],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.06323445,0.0022288798,0.00082359544,0.70929587,0.002531712,0.00041204641,0.00071764545,0.00009577278,0.22066006],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99064636,0.0010874129,0.0007739202,0.0009291613,0.0034842123,0.0030789692],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9843403,0.0083016725,0.0010114027,0.00056744646,0.0048330077,0.00094627816],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007460442,0.0005446297,0.0009261632,0.001162038,0.01812797,0.0052283704,0.0049547893,0.028357793,0.011542095],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024991918,0.0010369883,0.0008922142,0.0023216545,0.0042822324,0.0019947335,0.002627957,0.021328606,0.0033180583],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000474224,0.00004013659,0.0028629429,0.00017845046,0.000011641526,0.0009414118,0.009098478,0.00018048339,0.00069787534,0.049028203,0.93042874,0.006484208],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000031350137,0.000025346724,0.015718432,0.0005515494,0.000032199598,0.00027359065,0.00481382,0.00024112697,0.00059508544,0.0013878538,0.97622776,0.000101695616],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8486687,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.91470087,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8486687,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03998799,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.061618075,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.30444503},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2612569314","doi":"","title":"Beyond Convergence and the New Media Decisions: Regulatory Models in Communications Law","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Convergence (economics); Law; Business; Computer science; Law and economics; Political science; Economics","score_opus":0.035926426187780025,"score_gpt":0.29242761609655477,"score_spread":0.25650118990877474,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2612569314","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.028461032,0.005758927,0.15909863,0.111831166,0.0007243757,0.00023115681,0.00010899973,0.00020271771,0.693583],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9086248,0.0030337602,0.02350515,0.0073705264,0.0010643342,0.00036419375,0.00004538219,0.00007309754,0.05591877],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98549753,0.007675903,0.00039541224,0.0012566816,0.003550004,0.0016244549],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98820055,0.006627118,0.0009875598,0.0010795604,0.0023195175,0.0007857329],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014515546,0.0006850561,0.0008890278,0.0028662414,0.0052995617,0.016782241,0.003964233,0.008877659,0.0061973203],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01580919,0.0005148813,0.0013803166,0.0023346094,0.042599373,0.015079779,0.0060716867,0.009565775,0.0008697995],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002099391,0.0000052908604,0.00003223788,0.0000051402153,7.479102e-7,0.000009711654,0.00026980275,0.0006256009,0.000008612635,0.99812955,0.0002485767,0.00066258205],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016790857,0.00001875293,0.00016518396,0.00007759416,0.0000054208704,0.000024393534,0.00050661096,0.008173028,0.000075369324,0.9744889,0.016430289,0.000017744795],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04887696,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.036742654,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04887696,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.020423248,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020395335,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14818174},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2613195154","doi":"10.29173/alr1305","title":"Turning Lead into Gold: The Uncertain Alchemy of All Obligations Clauses","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Debtor; Bankruptcy; Obligation; Law and economics; Business; Order (exchange); Law; Property (philosophy); Unjust enrichment; Alchemy; Economics; Political science; Creditor; Restitution; Finance; Debt","score_opus":0.04283342699370961,"score_gpt":0.3567925954943779,"score_spread":0.3139591685006683,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2613195154","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08001022,0.010022842,0.06429123,0.05139818,0.00063143624,0.0000687896,0.00006815269,0.000084027415,0.79342514],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9706289,0.0022872798,0.0038454754,0.005579755,0.00020121621,0.00003439332,0.000016481838,0.000044758803,0.017361712],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99102086,0.0036623927,0.00027957463,0.0009351319,0.0030808542,0.0010213032],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98772347,0.008579824,0.0008876294,0.0012260283,0.0012952442,0.00028773583],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010290244,0.00026320972,0.00044058508,0.0012725361,0.0052611344,0.0071763042,0.0015630502,0.0037885068,0.005943196],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024219738,0.00046157307,0.00051014195,0.0008144869,0.024526933,0.013272902,0.0045859315,0.0067361654,0.0004871877],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000062217537,0.0000020315415,0.000091537324,0.000008316231,0.0000026389673,0.000032894783,0.000432554,0.00032652757,0.000039179402,0.9951885,0.00061125646,0.0032584057],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008968629,0.000009678275,0.0002610717,0.00005907244,0.000009571699,0.000042712654,0.0004794282,0.00073659874,0.00025366637,0.96640235,0.031724714,0.000012177517],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024446271,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02670479,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024446271,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0075286054,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0072434302,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05462408},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2613457364","doi":"","title":"L’OMPI: transposition en droit canadien des Traités Internet de 1996","year":2014,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de propriété intellectuelle","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Transposition (logic); Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.011816714546310149,"score_gpt":0.24429002914935985,"score_spread":0.2324733146030497,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2613457364","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20593295,0.010470814,0.008426151,0.029647833,0.010338645,0.00048231293,0.050584875,0.0023182172,0.68179816],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.30718687,0.005086686,0.006851604,0.0024771076,0.0014370546,0.00087408116,0.013172718,0.00082921615,0.66208464],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976993,0.00035507607,0.0001695765,0.00029115516,0.0009701979,0.0005147117],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967956,0.0012471587,0.00033251173,0.00044500653,0.0008010412,0.00037871214],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021433155,0.000624645,0.00042391024,0.0038888885,0.002128007,0.0039760503,0.0009207833,0.0018737233,0.042968184],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011045767,0.00039869756,0.00044092958,0.0058365813,0.0015265536,0.0024746116,0.0023896121,0.002926288,0.0091668945],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0010239122,0.00022701325,0.031287767,0.0005306754,0.000054735243,0.0019621102,0.010760504,0.0012685957,0.0028674705,0.16307752,0.3786746,0.408265],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000409587,0.00005293186,0.031203134,0.0001424747,0.00001434288,0.00055385975,0.001479866,0.0001995261,0.0016175739,0.0019327236,0.9627194,0.000043149677],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1092815,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05652237,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8907185,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005585548,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0054364046,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21729082},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2613804343","doi":"10.1017/9781316471203.004","title":"Legal Systems and Presumptions of Unity and Validity","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University; University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Epistemology; Law and economics; Psychology; Philosophy; Sociology","score_opus":0.0637927309348264,"score_gpt":0.2641489172887685,"score_spread":0.2003561863539421,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2613804343","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006193577,0.014734083,0.021457298,0.024966104,0.00043485424,0.00003481016,0.00012283244,0.000065117165,0.93199134],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.86161023,0.012153815,0.015049758,0.0046368274,0.0010102157,0.00029917515,0.00028023825,0.0001431254,0.1048167],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9915235,0.0047449367,0.0003316106,0.0008414408,0.0019176187,0.00064084167],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9922092,0.005563037,0.00041501436,0.0009846101,0.00064673903,0.00018133869],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00808897,0.0004860096,0.00068585895,0.0023159545,0.0041087526,0.010446343,0.0017417968,0.004065604,0.009446476],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018446377,0.00055322325,0.0006892275,0.0020321838,0.04587285,0.010522222,0.0039677257,0.0063491417,0.0018503995],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[6.686432e-7,7.4538497e-7,0.0000149347225,0.000006658989,6.287518e-7,0.000005636856,0.00023630614,0.000046109046,0.0000044954695,0.9976458,0.0012120071,0.0008261112],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002260512,0.000001208943,0.00005017,0.000065091146,0.0000012792507,0.000013491591,0.00019689913,0.00012694142,0.000021388194,0.9841011,0.015417839,0.0000023885652],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0054843333,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0040284847,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010446343,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007970459,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005256764,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.057829976},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W261386153","doi":"","title":"Introduction to Symposium on International Forum Shopping","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Texas international law journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Jurisdiction; Forum shopping; Economic Justice; Pride; Plaintiff; Principle of legality; Personal jurisdiction; Political science; Legislature; Sociology","score_opus":0.02131975852613543,"score_gpt":0.2982042085360114,"score_spread":0.27688445000987594,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W261386153","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0019652983,0.025208296,0.0013978499,0.046645027,0.38730386,0.00061487535,0.0010846527,0.0005490031,0.5352312],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0092403,0.020288967,0.0012047578,0.017054789,0.14309621,0.00049387227,0.0018234323,0.00045701902,0.8063406],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991798,0.0001147565,0.00004867718,0.00017440549,0.00026946067,0.00021292445],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982608,0.00015500265,0.000059923826,0.000049724105,0.00039167845,0.0010829327],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011944176,0.001975352,0.0008521123,0.0018837346,0.0033559562,0.006172536,0.0015328367,0.004774212,0.31298867],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019217875,0.000538829,0.0012061008,0.0012995692,0.00070011534,0.0044266945,0.0054952754,0.006869729,0.12513326],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036406138,0.00012107472,0.000087016866,0.00019059321,0.0000023098096,0.00009826751,0.00017788382,0.00004051494,0.00037257525,0.00279184,0.97125643,0.02482504],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000044838175,0.000028053919,0.00023020396,0.00014316924,0.0000015413095,0.000045720633,0.00020466605,0.0000145496015,0.000028384771,0.0004921968,0.9988022,0.0000048284974],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0014168702,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004335409,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31298867,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001762654,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024928998,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97993827},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2614125479","doi":"10.1002/iir.1267","title":"The Inherent Power of Common Law Courts to Provide Assistance in Cross‐Border Insolvencies: From Comity to Complexity","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Insolvency Review","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Comity; Insolvency; Statutory law; Law; Legislature; Power (physics); Common law; Commission; Law and economics; Position (finance); Political science; Economics; Jurisdiction; Business; Finance","score_opus":0.0806527052875713,"score_gpt":0.4639371395023051,"score_spread":0.3832844342147338,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2614125479","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.056975063,0.28352526,0.030568188,0.20744853,0.0020277812,0.00016796529,0.0000768727,0.000059083508,0.41915116],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92636967,0.04739356,0.0036926218,0.013909007,0.0016650227,0.000082361585,0.000026571675,0.000018695579,0.0068424996],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9629417,0.023527911,0.0018690187,0.0015430385,0.007996701,0.0021215607],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9138854,0.065252095,0.0056478907,0.003788988,0.010179,0.0012465898],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.030940525,0.00029136756,0.000586521,0.004229832,0.0032963678,0.011633832,0.0020698148,0.005749145,0.0029902817],"category_scores_gemma":[0.050563663,0.00041074576,0.00061755104,0.002897391,0.026174866,0.009231394,0.005531722,0.005175861,0.00028010947],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000044870794,0.000010796472,0.00040997102,0.00028509184,0.000021129215,0.00007862901,0.0016630316,0.000369653,0.00007907886,0.9745364,0.002819555,0.019722177],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004194865,0.000113586735,0.0062485007,0.011109998,0.00012639846,0.0005679857,0.0071329977,0.0016280647,0.00065436814,0.7201227,0.2521659,0.00008758305],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008369005,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0100664245,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030940525,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0057086106,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01182198,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16363108},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2622758090","doi":"","title":"Research Guides: Remedies: Remedies - Canada","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"libguides","venue":"","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Medicine","score_opus":0.14902050531228522,"score_gpt":0.44166164029390664,"score_spread":0.2926411349816214,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2622758090","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0021581165,0.010149893,0.0021801621,0.10762536,0.0055517782,0.0012184432,0.015861895,0.0015095939,0.85374475],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.015512327,0.00949281,0.0068425774,0.030389935,0.0006374086,0.00082953495,0.005377166,0.0005903544,0.93032795],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9886418,0.0013723659,0.0007915007,0.00059859076,0.006739122,0.0018566409],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96614033,0.0051192446,0.00077823864,0.0010195753,0.023586463,0.003356127],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009616248,0.0010556882,0.00096589344,0.0056542647,0.013636438,0.011080502,0.0043647042,0.010601848,0.1570199],"category_scores_gemma":[0.034453183,0.001093393,0.0009286892,0.0068590334,0.00481426,0.004783862,0.0046331054,0.008173989,0.02411074],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011951161,0.000045846085,0.00044276117,0.00016791582,0.0000031528202,0.000045054843,0.00036460455,0.00007035243,0.00005083917,0.036697607,0.9396768,0.022423023],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024174613,0.000008880207,0.0019484283,0.00055056275,0.000009137618,0.000031776657,0.001257255,0.00009585229,0.00020661134,0.0053110505,0.99052423,0.00003191335],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9260918,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97002274,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1570199,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.049886648,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.3509621,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.52528393},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2623963415","doi":"10.15821/slr.2015.23.1.005","title":"The Restrictions of Subrogated Underwriter’s Right under the Montreal Convention 1999","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Seoul Law Review","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Underwriting; Convention; Business; Law; Political science; Actuarial science","score_opus":0.05335164273572838,"score_gpt":0.34206240903013935,"score_spread":0.28871076629441095,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2623963415","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06569309,0.02803506,0.0028315464,0.07651554,0.0017862375,0.0002785301,0.0015395563,0.00010226751,0.8232181],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.66155964,0.012486776,0.0020213174,0.05688377,0.0011111135,0.00031255028,0.0005653324,0.00013813986,0.26492134],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98815304,0.0015252741,0.00045276177,0.001531758,0.0046596336,0.003677508],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9914637,0.00355073,0.0006331162,0.00068263436,0.0029868665,0.00068298925],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009569812,0.00064206717,0.0005826637,0.0024042777,0.007718848,0.010155302,0.004120437,0.009441314,0.013100405],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024814285,0.0010888838,0.00093481696,0.0028718235,0.01039084,0.0053838626,0.0032668486,0.011127275,0.0011221851],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000048505204,0.000038145474,0.0020710758,0.00007979939,0.00003432515,0.00016984995,0.0012692909,0.00026886305,0.00042295296,0.9200995,0.061839446,0.013658199],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011878926,0.0000817169,0.032620993,0.00095298054,0.00019561389,0.00020398533,0.0024264285,0.0007062044,0.0022710855,0.07049737,0.8896669,0.00025793616],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7773859,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.84862274,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7773859,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.032992825,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06263541,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.44785023},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2626267038","doi":"","title":"The General Principles of Law: Who Needs Them?","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.03704335970269884,"score_gpt":0.2847005071333762,"score_spread":0.24765714743067735,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2626267038","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0046333987,0.03148757,0.015395268,0.87037086,0.002807878,0.000099040444,0.00015586718,0.000072652656,0.07497754],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.59860283,0.049326234,0.050409447,0.26227507,0.012753909,0.0008930619,0.00048734093,0.00027805893,0.024973998],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9812975,0.011525434,0.0009843111,0.0011935261,0.0032211498,0.0017781636],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95644295,0.026978737,0.003255095,0.003315781,0.0071894326,0.0028180494],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03534033,0.00083691924,0.0028420233,0.002916593,0.008036403,0.01722966,0.0046926253,0.017563688,0.0064157103],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06269129,0.0010359397,0.0014321043,0.0036110552,0.091640726,0.039117057,0.005756719,0.026188554,0.0013090102],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000101713085,0.00002832894,0.0005386694,0.00011763157,0.000011797395,0.000035038665,0.0025393874,0.00017392963,0.000022480159,0.95203394,0.034150116,0.010338502],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019022364,0.000009808707,0.000627431,0.0004664139,0.000011012566,0.00006357482,0.003567939,0.00019402275,0.000025480409,0.92350197,0.071492545,0.000020827823],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03014914,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.032484412,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03534033,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011607019,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.025330864,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18689972},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2626939963","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2987207","title":"Family Violence and Proving Grave Riskk for Cases under the Hague Convention Article 13(b)","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Convention; Law; History; Political science","score_opus":0.03619065261292647,"score_gpt":0.3136975977160221,"score_spread":0.27750694510309565,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2626939963","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3746799,0.011383101,0.006530625,0.14869602,0.002999095,0.00053862063,0.0012448437,0.00011275409,0.45381507],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9661932,0.0015588286,0.0020441504,0.009662354,0.0003240997,0.00019451724,0.00022014402,0.000027285154,0.019775407],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9823252,0.005559524,0.0012396778,0.0009437027,0.0027109815,0.007220892],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9554449,0.028990794,0.004872777,0.002535714,0.003328924,0.0048269466],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021140821,0.0003479414,0.00082211447,0.0038328965,0.012071088,0.007823302,0.0033006242,0.018280078,0.011847654],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11925768,0.00085649494,0.0010095047,0.0017294572,0.0082397405,0.005126929,0.007192784,0.009424997,0.00093164877],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00038168425,0.00038761465,0.11510315,0.00033721054,0.00018391416,0.007215389,0.024860937,0.0013125709,0.0005360406,0.6788129,0.10244643,0.06842213],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016096534,0.00036300297,0.20171331,0.004739674,0.0004638842,0.006776975,0.06550363,0.003346445,0.0019681677,0.52296543,0.19142099,0.00057754834],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11646871,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.28441346,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11646871,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004426783,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.031022947,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23158163},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2628882733","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198758457.013.16","title":"The Emergence and Development of Intellectual Property Law in Canada","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Intellectual property; Dominion; Statute; Law; Political science; Independence (probability theory); Common law; Statute of limitations; Property law; Supreme court; Property rights","score_opus":0.035722346509865145,"score_gpt":0.23073299639863884,"score_spread":0.1950106498887737,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2628882733","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.033319097,0.038687475,0.0024335345,0.06674786,0.0009888527,0.00009150404,0.0003553388,0.00010774842,0.8572687],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7061384,0.0583669,0.0045195734,0.01351369,0.00041017713,0.00009290453,0.0003793625,0.00018557413,0.21639349],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9938651,0.0004614777,0.00011076076,0.00044199242,0.003530067,0.0015905554],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960168,0.00107504,0.00016925501,0.00012736634,0.0019524328,0.0006591174],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002306311,0.0003663768,0.00041644723,0.004632536,0.019760003,0.016161507,0.0015420318,0.0028614714,0.006969938],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0063580945,0.0004802505,0.00046621144,0.009344786,0.022839742,0.0038223807,0.0031571714,0.0058760163,0.0005423837],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000076233982,0.000010337796,0.0005866459,0.00007594477,0.0000047332096,0.0002530018,0.00809846,0.00039465915,0.00012166535,0.937836,0.02240431,0.030206768],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000101006735,0.000009487393,0.0040777945,0.00044947962,0.000011712238,0.00013139438,0.006166518,0.0007246796,0.00021583076,0.058006603,0.9301466,0.000049844584],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99189293,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.993166,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.67971647,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.32028356,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.33605388,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7883747},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2666126237","doi":"","title":"Layered Rights: Robertson v. Thomson","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Law and economics; Chemistry; Political science; Economics","score_opus":0.017198936154274657,"score_gpt":0.2916194686784881,"score_spread":0.27442053252421345,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2666126237","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.051788893,0.0029091788,0.0063419654,0.047632698,0.0005532671,0.00011726215,0.00033235335,0.00013414792,0.8901901],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.68826467,0.0015583272,0.0020143006,0.09146625,0.0006553361,0.00020636844,0.00020859983,0.00007847951,0.2155477],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99221593,0.0012890813,0.0002951288,0.001039101,0.0032908758,0.001870036],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99683243,0.0015565519,0.00021067265,0.00031344272,0.0007039621,0.00038292524],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003798306,0.00045740465,0.00035986802,0.0011118816,0.0062041753,0.009621709,0.0019969968,0.011458859,0.008597061],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012123572,0.0005558724,0.00078332605,0.0011599881,0.0067760637,0.005418711,0.00530739,0.0070680343,0.0018538974],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000418345,0.000017720447,0.0006530014,0.00002041742,0.000014558243,0.0006975529,0.003993667,0.00016604985,0.0005965758,0.9612833,0.025778282,0.0067370716],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016242776,0.000079684505,0.0036000076,0.00044852574,0.00014572029,0.000984798,0.00331386,0.0013179071,0.0031990863,0.25365496,0.73290604,0.00018690615],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.16887046,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16771004,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16887046,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011205037,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010634118,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33577502},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2726606836","doi":"10.1007/978-3-319-56574-3_30","title":"Commonwealth Africa: Foreign Law in Commonwealth African Courts","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Ius comparatum","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Thompson Rivers University","funders":"","keywords":"Commonwealth; Law; Political science; Context (archaeology); Comparative law; International law; Geography","score_opus":0.08071544789419803,"score_gpt":0.333722654878665,"score_spread":0.25300720698446694,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2726606836","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01819766,0.04909212,0.0007403624,0.017628197,0.0012035142,0.000059473874,0.00006675473,0.000020383814,0.9129915],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5510724,0.029662987,0.0011350091,0.009565262,0.00094541075,0.0001689673,0.000091585396,0.0000703357,0.40728804],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99927086,0.00024821408,0.000023727063,0.00005621246,0.000118941534,0.0002821411],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994815,0.00027816615,0.000058763755,0.000029750217,0.00007951827,0.0000723648],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010083363,0.00045612804,0.00027790325,0.001855558,0.008637565,0.008903575,0.0007142152,0.0033530854,0.01460719],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028665261,0.0002629338,0.00017433923,0.0034918513,0.0051316665,0.0055642463,0.002663056,0.004285167,0.0008805609],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007264528,0.000013513483,0.0001505727,0.000049614082,0.0000016538121,0.00018242995,0.0063405144,0.000041583357,0.000061972074,0.94297653,0.03367914,0.016495185],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011218732,0.000021653645,0.0024120223,0.0011673194,0.000009407606,0.00042516275,0.014710934,0.00012256586,0.0002584394,0.13103136,0.8498113,0.000018556935],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.046127576,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09350994,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.046127576,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00780921,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008642122,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0917182},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2727239441","doi":"10.1093/law/9780199666409.001.0001","title":"Human Rights and Private International Law","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Law; Political science; Conflict of laws; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.019888380856064317,"score_gpt":0.25051333534988623,"score_spread":0.23062495449382192,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2727239441","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0009936843,0.008937834,0.0007267631,0.0055775465,0.00047049538,0.000012935963,0.000027147817,0.000016685759,0.98323697],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.12706165,0.015929257,0.0010124256,0.0073903124,0.0015965374,0.00009626791,0.00012258173,0.00007253929,0.84671843],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99878687,0.0004609472,0.000032474753,0.00012367137,0.00045838405,0.00013758578],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999137,0.00045107654,0.00004674721,0.0001536498,0.00014233516,0.000069355985],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000934564,0.00032294472,0.0002868716,0.0008857112,0.0029186322,0.0065784594,0.00050422054,0.0020633582,0.022362672],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001953917,0.00021517252,0.00023665265,0.0010485557,0.011520318,0.0047469884,0.0025994368,0.003405144,0.002902973],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001236291,0.0000071838376,0.00002813753,0.00002524458,5.635667e-7,0.00001876868,0.00086164015,0.00007853992,0.00002876743,0.9658089,0.025501424,0.0076396298],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000027892786,0.000007670784,0.00018923957,0.0003341346,0.0000014981891,0.000063861684,0.0010338265,0.00014017217,0.00005839814,0.20253673,0.7956271,0.000004526811],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0079748565,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008794741,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022362672,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004810321,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004266905,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.074810624},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2731669318","doi":"","title":"A Review of Canadian Radiocommunications Law Around \"Jammers\"","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Canadian journal of law and technology","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Business; Political science","score_opus":0.06626764288385133,"score_gpt":0.3556558498855568,"score_spread":0.2893882070017055,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2731669318","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00011771933,0.9909146,0.00008533365,0.002291471,0.00048672376,0.000014662366,0.000083310886,0.0000074542386,0.0059987158],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0018555665,0.99488467,0.00015899556,0.0012313499,0.00022596492,0.000012387624,0.00006128826,0.0000024721767,0.0015673904],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973578,0.0003285925,0.00019636466,0.00014427183,0.0017892128,0.00018364745],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9940848,0.0018225162,0.00038558245,0.000081168175,0.0034339956,0.00019197624],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00345905,0.0013357042,0.0017759504,0.012887791,0.0025541915,0.0035781257,0.0017704084,0.0027579307,0.0047528716],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0094914315,0.000514465,0.0006130736,0.021151498,0.0030768116,0.0017083025,0.00095065206,0.001996535,0.0008280318],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003744118,0.000030171519,0.00036689508,0.026344752,0.00008348701,0.00021200911,0.0006777084,0.0005858964,0.00022706938,0.02570053,0.44552386,0.50021017],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000512205,0.000009859921,0.0014273371,0.010199625,0.00007199381,0.00009318229,0.00019909491,0.000022569562,0.000051541134,0.0011633937,0.9867388,0.000017434055],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6780591,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.79618657,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3219409,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.024953801,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.089166865,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6476737},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2734332218","doi":"","title":"La cyberintimidation : Analyse juridique","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Business","score_opus":0.012614384422242532,"score_gpt":0.2889151570106097,"score_spread":0.27630077258836716,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2734332218","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.29168928,0.020144764,0.04090552,0.035414476,0.00034228415,0.0004853684,0.001678518,0.00013455308,0.6092052],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9089247,0.0079235295,0.007872908,0.0013386669,0.00022520225,0.00029816732,0.000330931,0.000052313746,0.07303355],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9953099,0.0014275976,0.0001745291,0.0003680831,0.0020986218,0.0006213817],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99207073,0.0039336737,0.0010583164,0.00031176524,0.0023080623,0.00031747587],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004323518,0.00023655924,0.00046243734,0.005188738,0.006153858,0.0077232574,0.001172254,0.0014533811,0.018420171],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013400047,0.00028673979,0.0004571808,0.007186868,0.007072041,0.0045148693,0.002238295,0.0035352325,0.0007972376],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021507532,0.000036652105,0.011338458,0.00023042405,0.000026591712,0.00011958132,0.026041308,0.0012009892,0.00020590138,0.91385543,0.0073349816,0.03958817],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003471199,0.0000782393,0.14549662,0.0011049195,0.00012000932,0.0004676672,0.060207326,0.0072256546,0.0017841358,0.19562954,0.58767724,0.00017390292],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.21720998,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2839081,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.21720998,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02421889,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02056602,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.43189138},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2737184433","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v34i1.5009","title":"A THIRD REVOLUTION IN FAMILY DISPUTE RESOLUTION: ACCESSIBLE LEGAL PROFESSIONALISM","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Family law; Scholarship; Economic Justice; Law; Dispute resolution; Political science; Doctrine; Alternative dispute resolution; Practice of law; Sociology; Legal practice; Service (business); Legal profession; Business","score_opus":0.09713719114710222,"score_gpt":0.4104399470507432,"score_spread":0.313302755903641,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2737184433","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.31313738,0.017649988,0.01503321,0.15319538,0.000523487,0.00015365909,0.00019243581,0.00015333864,0.4999612],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9621617,0.004357213,0.0041736397,0.004252138,0.00008437447,0.00002453122,0.000042861375,0.00002085851,0.02488259],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9950505,0.00069392513,0.00008386726,0.0004179936,0.0020522072,0.0017015334],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9951139,0.0012510356,0.0003170839,0.00044243896,0.001143205,0.0017323383],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031438281,0.00014027183,0.00022586384,0.0017831858,0.012454087,0.006992619,0.0013520927,0.001921408,0.0055802907],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00672779,0.00018236991,0.00037278142,0.0020331172,0.022183882,0.004214067,0.00524263,0.0026644217,0.00020589429],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020813322,0.00005679682,0.0069305967,0.00012075116,0.000006543546,0.0004269397,0.04121637,0.00055475073,0.0003552152,0.8122344,0.015565764,0.12251113],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026766613,0.00008308093,0.040774006,0.0006491652,0.000020002959,0.0006635831,0.04680397,0.0015925289,0.0006634072,0.12375792,0.78488314,0.00008244178],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9162753,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9486666,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9162753,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07570172,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.126576,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.54925704},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2738143575","doi":"10.29173/alr784","title":"Organized Pseudolegal Commercial Arguments in Canadian Inter-Partner Family Law Court Disputes","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Meaning (existential); Government (linguistics); Family law; Conflict of laws; Spouse; Phenomenon; Character (mathematics); Sociology; Political science; Epistemology; Philosophy; Mathematics","score_opus":0.03193519093153488,"score_gpt":0.3449691696536009,"score_spread":0.31303397872206606,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2738143575","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22537164,0.18413036,0.004398997,0.037542112,0.0007144407,0.00018558603,0.00037759778,0.000054251806,0.547225],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96321833,0.026467606,0.000820775,0.0031589651,0.00011550926,0.000033898727,0.00008390897,0.000017440054,0.0060835704],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9841791,0.00469154,0.00044152405,0.0009957056,0.0069537875,0.0027384057],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9725921,0.015736049,0.0020504834,0.00072565174,0.0076278523,0.0012678755],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012023884,0.00031293728,0.0005792119,0.008419313,0.016933462,0.014909311,0.0025671194,0.004488472,0.003945688],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031262092,0.00039107777,0.0004186598,0.011911423,0.022521762,0.00378474,0.0033107277,0.0037034329,0.00019361945],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033814074,0.000041414074,0.0071806177,0.0006448943,0.00007332994,0.0011464012,0.045593735,0.0014001599,0.00016274079,0.85632855,0.027680753,0.059713624],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006553776,0.00005030392,0.07048266,0.003978013,0.00022524963,0.0009331359,0.090996295,0.0019171261,0.00055091304,0.1415177,0.6890521,0.00023086194],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9367463,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96615225,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10021844,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10021844,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09887192,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.72713906},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2745647843","doi":"10.1163/18754112-02003004","title":"The Development of Singapore’s Military Justice System","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International Peacekeeping","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Military justice; Law; Economic Justice; Political science; Human rights; Independence (probability theory); International law; International court; Public administration; Public international law","score_opus":0.025110063677621208,"score_gpt":0.3142576477662071,"score_spread":0.28914758408858593,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2745647843","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7375249,0.0028520424,0.0012360814,0.014892935,0.00018944156,0.000098874385,0.0004364536,0.000066631845,0.24270256],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9844675,0.00090192765,0.00066845084,0.00071079377,0.0000218727,0.000015875274,0.00016631949,0.000012309532,0.013035085],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986261,0.00037595633,0.00013443775,0.00013871028,0.00037763122,0.00034725078],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979449,0.00014590609,0.00039037946,0.00013108131,0.0009616715,0.00042605595],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016978607,0.00014851312,0.00016904318,0.00081706385,0.0020483912,0.0039385674,0.00038108914,0.00063004944,0.0056150877],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019964275,0.00015469416,0.00020521341,0.00092682714,0.0019725186,0.0019793287,0.0030238074,0.0012711358,0.0007734778],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014414471,0.00020482815,0.097656086,0.00060114445,0.000100715144,0.0037132322,0.04120083,0.0019523805,0.0069777453,0.57980436,0.024869818,0.24277486],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002330211,0.00043191767,0.30388996,0.0004908408,0.000035716526,0.0009694026,0.015486064,0.0018495119,0.0036118545,0.011560906,0.661541,0.00010953903],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04379356,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.079061896,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04379356,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0065841745,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009974624,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08707732},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2746004208","doi":"","title":"Domestic Implementation of International Treaties: The Next New Challenge for Private International Law?","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the Annual Meeting-American Society of International Law","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; International law; Private law; Commercial law; Political science; Conflict of laws; Municipal law; Comparative law; Public law; Sociology","score_opus":0.02513259140451764,"score_gpt":0.33399813620009283,"score_spread":0.3088655447955752,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2746004208","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0026961216,0.0052453857,0.0017214152,0.86007226,0.00726512,0.000054271022,0.000046821548,0.00005730965,0.12284128],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.18203849,0.014628968,0.0039243493,0.5576205,0.0135850385,0.00050901825,0.0003531496,0.00040421713,0.22693627],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9756419,0.012060534,0.0007151994,0.0018178215,0.004462113,0.0053024944],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99203545,0.0029704403,0.0005617082,0.00091313606,0.0018559173,0.001663275],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020905014,0.0006187503,0.0014076191,0.0008308273,0.015242751,0.030468255,0.0031572357,0.025354048,0.02001191],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02373951,0.0008500363,0.0011397549,0.001519352,0.0117488345,0.02440292,0.010863523,0.024118695,0.0052226274],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014304975,0.000071089045,0.00030627518,0.00009525874,0.0000078673265,0.00015782265,0.0067157196,0.0001480504,0.000163703,0.49939087,0.46490738,0.02802175],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012991914,0.000022315677,0.00075883354,0.0004111206,0.0000063442167,0.00004550592,0.014022521,0.00014280897,0.000116856776,0.053369716,0.9310588,0.000032164622],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013530139,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021207392,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030468255,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011552692,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.026611716,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.110557616},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2747492913","doi":"","title":"A Whole New Meaning to Having Our Head in the Clouds: Voice Recognition Technology, the Transmission of our Oral Communications to the Cloud and the Ability of Canadian Law to Protect Us from the Dangers it Presents","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Meaning (existential); Cloud computing; Head (geology); Transmission (telecommunications); Computer science; Communication; Telecommunications; Law; Psychology; Political science; Geology","score_opus":0.06512706790163116,"score_gpt":0.3402128090900553,"score_spread":0.27508574118842416,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2747492913","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017926298,0.031771228,0.007997277,0.5112102,0.0058927494,0.00006546519,0.00023304955,0.000219881,0.42468384],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.51221997,0.03440422,0.0069833347,0.12756608,0.002170278,0.000081282626,0.00016144858,0.0003512146,0.31606215],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9859926,0.0021231964,0.0003462699,0.0013747395,0.007997941,0.00216518],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9890342,0.0038122968,0.00059363834,0.00070136925,0.004434767,0.001423809],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0052071293,0.00065128686,0.0004318929,0.0017662403,0.0336722,0.02617626,0.00263387,0.0112042185,0.00973279],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013906918,0.00066375016,0.00047707107,0.0020847686,0.061056677,0.013536326,0.005983117,0.014044045,0.0017525152],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000038225204,0.000021926326,0.0014133101,0.00018005795,0.000011970271,0.00076319213,0.081701316,0.00014475214,0.0010252825,0.6975354,0.16306724,0.05409738],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000066791213,0.000015928803,0.0021486073,0.0005521283,0.000017544642,0.00066497584,0.035717223,0.00023253774,0.0006310123,0.030988568,0.92886794,0.00015697778],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95118207,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.95734805,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06842665,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06842665,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08179681,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49647242},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2752149979","doi":"","title":"Canada Law Book Company","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biographies | United Kingdom Encyclopedia of Law","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Business; Political science","score_opus":0.02212696804910387,"score_gpt":0.2649659791132603,"score_spread":0.24283901106415645,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2752149979","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00030402513,0.0024775513,0.00016023779,0.0017956328,0.00037891627,0.00004831631,0.0017406053,0.0001876572,0.99290705],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0009944311,0.0007608907,0.00008069908,0.0004714086,0.000031280808,0.000016020998,0.00032694355,0.000060699604,0.99725765],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982249,0.00006440403,0.000035109424,0.00017439591,0.0012364748,0.00026468252],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998228,0.00018403413,0.000043132775,0.00014852104,0.0011950864,0.00020123798],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005304256,0.0012228428,0.00082567363,0.005304302,0.010483357,0.008485376,0.0016684795,0.00477357,0.40291512],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028339415,0.0013120221,0.0006403377,0.0061814524,0.001661787,0.0027175972,0.0015663062,0.004149131,0.20578697],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000067016913,0.000014331314,0.00010610119,0.0000322279,0.0000016416624,0.000026697442,0.00006416421,0.00006555421,0.000040359326,0.020264106,0.95310277,0.026275288],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002478926,0.0000017971097,0.00021482841,0.000057539633,0.0000017392954,0.000014230178,0.00005880979,0.000050832277,0.0000363903,0.0011519989,0.9984041,0.000005303785],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.84329724,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9454179,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.40291512,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.025201445,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04320102,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8516691},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2754018347","doi":"","title":"Theories of law and the constitutional law of the British Empire : an address read by invitation before the Canadian Bar Association, [...]","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books  | UK Encyclopedia of Law","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Association (psychology); Bar (unit); Empire; Constitutional law; Political science; Philosophy; Geography; Epistemology","score_opus":0.009587300853810907,"score_gpt":0.2527566127517983,"score_spread":0.24316931189798738,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2754018347","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0031848163,0.29948482,0.002934144,0.37105784,0.007506289,0.00002795687,0.0006966366,0.00012953856,0.31497794],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.26000354,0.18436782,0.0034995563,0.048763484,0.009220063,0.00010232626,0.0007321183,0.00023839025,0.49307275],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993187,0.00016739586,0.000024873201,0.00005415147,0.0003112234,0.0001235145],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991074,0.0004297353,0.00004807054,0.00004372392,0.00028981263,0.00008120143],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00096171943,0.00058779307,0.00045275028,0.0020200307,0.005068653,0.005712818,0.0010291939,0.003481705,0.013377302],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024248173,0.00041769247,0.00029512309,0.0035158445,0.012007085,0.0052321586,0.00088014326,0.0040793256,0.0018979062],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008385747,0.0000072786274,0.00021386407,0.00013180653,0.0000046829045,0.00004106791,0.002664666,0.00019523915,0.00008574484,0.43913963,0.54090774,0.016599854],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000048732195,0.000004869884,0.002474175,0.0002933796,0.000004068277,0.00005486049,0.0024765925,0.00019515098,0.00008181778,0.16345386,0.830938,0.000018440725],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5358928,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7465969,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9807737,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.019226326,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013358724,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9336809},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2755268770","doi":"","title":"The Upper Canada law list","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books  | UK Encyclopedia of Law","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.011072686608371947,"score_gpt":0.25198706522070485,"score_spread":0.24091437861233292,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2755268770","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00049678405,0.0016469932,0.00019443307,0.0039990535,0.0008416002,0.000085210886,0.007069724,0.00041726825,0.98524886],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.001366822,0.0007391936,0.00013721493,0.001087621,0.000057013163,0.000028271405,0.0012665822,0.00013708322,0.99518025],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99722844,0.00006891924,0.000053842927,0.00016420486,0.0018358872,0.00064870116],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99589276,0.00022165332,0.000058682454,0.00019104267,0.00310114,0.0005346333],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007565139,0.0010942598,0.00092284946,0.006079931,0.014539459,0.011734189,0.0023232973,0.0036027485,0.48078552],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004386079,0.001177529,0.000790087,0.0086855795,0.0018339605,0.0028487674,0.0020046083,0.0043785768,0.21542482],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000037292498,0.000008878605,0.00010898849,0.000025242138,9.170437e-7,0.00001797999,0.000046488007,0.000030809177,0.000025700601,0.010909052,0.9768689,0.01195322],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000016452519,0.0000011903609,0.00044432824,0.00004223282,0.0000011111861,0.0000096616905,0.00008597339,0.00003099322,0.000034134802,0.0007241181,0.9986167,0.000007976419],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95634925,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9807402,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.48078552,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.048658952,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09942431,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7405964},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2760976352","doi":"","title":"Manitoba. Law Reform Commission","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biographies | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Commission; Law reform; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Economics","score_opus":0.02506875251680596,"score_gpt":0.27766213789328437,"score_spread":0.2525933853764784,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2760976352","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002345311,0.0026335255,0.00013851482,0.026598373,0.0019400774,0.00025979654,0.02357795,0.00077560154,0.94173074],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0029321,0.00046959886,0.00009093723,0.002260342,0.000060170303,0.00006237491,0.0018097891,0.00007232097,0.99224234],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99876946,0.0000815157,0.000045651956,0.000121471814,0.00062692893,0.00035492718],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966338,0.0003595391,0.00012937866,0.0002571351,0.00199464,0.0006255046],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008915616,0.00068139576,0.00060249626,0.0032758976,0.0063233613,0.004670896,0.0025927864,0.0037157713,0.49025202],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0035272308,0.00102729,0.00049973436,0.0057338695,0.0011124474,0.0016306466,0.0017923615,0.0035195965,0.15112627],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020009682,0.000032591455,0.00050103624,0.00007440598,0.000003828841,0.000059744365,0.00010338083,0.00004942285,0.000054188058,0.008618937,0.9717615,0.018720927],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019349785,0.000004519987,0.0031580324,0.000083939245,0.0000044356752,0.000011195592,0.0002972915,0.00006998534,0.00006272709,0.0007064428,0.9955751,0.000007042962],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.86163163,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.92006886,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9785083,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.021491678,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.061904673,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7270936},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2761172895","doi":"10.3917/neg.028.0223","title":"À propos de l’ouvrage de Robert A. Baruch Bush et Joseph P. Folger, The Promise of Mediation. The Transformative Approach to Conflict , Éd. révisée, San Francisco, Jossey-Bass Publishers, 2005, 287 p.","year":2017,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Négociations","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"HEC Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Bass (fish); Humanities; Art; Philosophy; Geology","score_opus":0.026519645828153294,"score_gpt":0.3106052506210481,"score_spread":0.2840856047928948,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2761172895","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0008825557,0.7352511,0.0076023107,0.2260117,0.01244935,0.00004072572,0.00017443759,0.000044350632,0.017543426],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.041472726,0.7086884,0.01697593,0.16550103,0.014074065,0.0003518999,0.00026566396,0.0002508077,0.05241966],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9951002,0.002702478,0.00022538214,0.0006086136,0.0011351038,0.00022816438],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9940089,0.0041059875,0.0003705443,0.0002175301,0.0010031098,0.00029398216],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0070410324,0.0016982737,0.0014366789,0.0029023036,0.0046285647,0.010588792,0.0028523768,0.0067050764,0.008500321],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011187196,0.0009552352,0.0011147301,0.0038491145,0.013960383,0.019740036,0.0050013186,0.013064882,0.0030110432],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010415731,0.00008646581,0.0006286165,0.0014553597,0.000050706098,0.00051852973,0.02060639,0.00024117964,0.00035527739,0.35120437,0.535018,0.0897309],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010350678,0.000012564051,0.000466329,0.0010397664,0.00001315835,0.00033817944,0.0028509179,0.000072344505,0.00021067039,0.06748084,0.92747205,0.000032861713],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.040167097,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.059693974,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.040167097,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0058491286,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008261387,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07986659},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2762226998","doi":"","title":"University of Alberta. Institute of Law Research and Reform","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biographies | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law; Public administration; Law reform","score_opus":0.04676969797403268,"score_gpt":0.3042039743835327,"score_spread":0.2574342764095,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2762226998","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0019774963,0.015781034,0.00054072187,0.018441994,0.003054113,0.000049951374,0.040310767,0.0008572311,0.9189867],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.012413787,0.0058826837,0.0013750033,0.0012091561,0.00019772392,0.000044007527,0.006455974,0.00024926852,0.9721725],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998061,0.00009939327,0.000058328627,0.00021587162,0.0010451087,0.0005203223],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99607724,0.00046592898,0.00011605076,0.00023936247,0.002256441,0.0008449425],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008906365,0.0013494304,0.0010085737,0.0048992503,0.0050100605,0.007468758,0.0019530151,0.0030851583,0.3379568],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0032015746,0.0009451799,0.0006137719,0.010523147,0.0017964022,0.0020593198,0.0015548925,0.0027843043,0.07548122],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000047629677,0.000029868037,0.000857407,0.00019010453,0.00000784047,0.00008713378,0.00021166414,0.00014579226,0.00004845283,0.036091607,0.88948166,0.07280095],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016406555,0.0000050153826,0.004412092,0.00024513734,0.000011284343,0.000034041204,0.0007546745,0.00015713047,0.00008040048,0.0047786,0.98948926,0.000015988577],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95609236,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9695035,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3379568,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.038861386,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07547895,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9443243},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2762411864","doi":"","title":"Canada case citator = Table de la jurisprudence citee du Canada.","year":2016,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Books | European Encyclopedia of Law","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Table (database); Political science; Humanities; Law; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.0064119489842306135,"score_gpt":0.23378951212356072,"score_spread":0.2273775631393301,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2762411864","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0023060322,0.032522492,0.0006762768,0.029517923,0.013664679,0.0003392204,0.016829733,0.00037194908,0.90377176],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.024770444,0.014712844,0.0008144261,0.009077158,0.0013011651,0.00016214608,0.0039391974,0.00026019974,0.9449623],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957569,0.00013346267,0.00012534381,0.0003772797,0.0027035782,0.0009033456],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962209,0.00045615854,0.00010521665,0.000117464784,0.0028267507,0.00027356582],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009265525,0.0008460669,0.0011224685,0.0068410686,0.012765315,0.00798419,0.0022856155,0.004480121,0.13691884],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0048675514,0.00077045284,0.0010835857,0.010666013,0.002759018,0.0017978479,0.001518487,0.0053054066,0.022278853],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010859558,0.0000068124727,0.00022109313,0.0001209882,0.000007917648,0.0001197994,0.00015306554,0.000050488274,0.000073682844,0.028384387,0.96244013,0.008410738],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000065439567,0.0000013438043,0.0011089453,0.000116192816,0.0000060877596,0.00004355095,0.00014563285,0.000026899601,0.00009829777,0.00075942336,0.9976761,0.000010963592],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9792981,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9881082,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13691884,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.065720245,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.10128886,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47683597},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2763647815","doi":"","title":"University of British Columbia. Faculty of Law","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biography | US Enciclopedia of law","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.018625780709912783,"score_gpt":0.24871574592866916,"score_spread":0.23008996521875638,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2763647815","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002326495,0.006750256,0.0001640884,0.01357604,0.0017014031,0.000045389792,0.015012717,0.0003989756,0.96002454],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0050785667,0.0015670927,0.00012290635,0.0006010911,0.00004821784,0.000015883126,0.0008075266,0.000086722444,0.99167186],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99899596,0.00006681869,0.00004942983,0.00014531282,0.00042507294,0.000317469],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971432,0.000371572,0.00010471118,0.00016743239,0.001441292,0.00077171455],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005238681,0.0008968552,0.00083013444,0.0033703235,0.008157429,0.007851895,0.0017053693,0.0037667875,0.5959379],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0036050174,0.0009114041,0.0004183388,0.006584025,0.0014226821,0.0022781142,0.0017355699,0.0031246229,0.18768209],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026347696,0.00003416067,0.0011099487,0.0001502565,0.000004634524,0.00014044931,0.00028526183,0.000069820075,0.000068073576,0.007960148,0.9225239,0.06762689],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000075783923,0.0000040247,0.0045355745,0.00027204273,0.0000059357117,0.00003914168,0.0009866871,0.00010167219,0.00006999512,0.0009469739,0.99301445,0.000015895577],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.88904715,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9589613,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.88904715,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.019648457,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.028278751,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5763455},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2763850975","doi":"","title":"Canada. Privy Council","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biographies | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.021366187253584818,"score_gpt":0.21595695186401404,"score_spread":0.1945907646104292,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2763850975","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00041288702,0.0009169988,0.00012263744,0.0070987307,0.0011008126,0.00007539797,0.010053711,0.0007746846,0.97944415],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.001210282,0.00024949596,0.00007442634,0.0010768034,0.00004296803,0.000014322697,0.0010777682,0.00015873667,0.99609524],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984333,0.00004934454,0.000030707553,0.00013942001,0.0008801219,0.00046707853],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9965209,0.00022489688,0.000107672946,0.00024492544,0.0018706757,0.0010310803],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006460306,0.0009175045,0.0008849431,0.0030505657,0.0084811365,0.006069224,0.0019279749,0.0036367138,0.79626733],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031017456,0.0011398803,0.00068041653,0.0050181425,0.0017044588,0.0017001185,0.0022476418,0.0029959565,0.48881608],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011325123,0.000013446761,0.0001292517,0.000035141944,0.0000013289385,0.000018839175,0.00002078203,0.000027317777,0.000021571328,0.0026022121,0.98307586,0.014042897],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000063199536,0.0000024275416,0.0005160344,0.000031432715,0.0000014332618,0.000006957069,0.00006601043,0.000033902055,0.00002209289,0.00045832488,0.99884987,0.000005177713],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8856584,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.95621955,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.79626733,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.020099992,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06670998,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29059988},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2766450298","doi":"","title":"Proceedings of the ... annual meeting of the Canadian Bar Association.","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Association (psychology); Bar (unit); Political science; Geography; Psychology; Meteorology","score_opus":0.008383829629134398,"score_gpt":0.21585425077542483,"score_spread":0.20747042114629044,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2766450298","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0030940806,0.046462905,0.00073654304,0.09409115,0.045846187,0.00026888464,0.0121279815,0.0002832925,0.79708904],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0076343715,0.008627776,0.0005445722,0.0037035556,0.0019352904,0.000045820594,0.0019653956,0.000069853944,0.9754733],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99913317,0.000047228204,0.000019751737,0.000067872425,0.0005399763,0.00019198423],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99835664,0.00007218485,0.00003630991,0.000043671484,0.0011039986,0.00038719972],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009296799,0.0008428234,0.00047321265,0.0012699389,0.004245248,0.0023885623,0.0011395572,0.002328767,0.14332017],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022120303,0.00033567462,0.00037833137,0.0012326919,0.0010581118,0.001034522,0.0011040721,0.0022348366,0.03825497],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001002795,0.000006642162,0.00016408927,0.000023591487,0.000001809085,0.000014480708,0.00004045498,0.00001554856,0.000044126937,0.00063492055,0.9885225,0.010521812],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002197167,0.0000021856686,0.0020331545,0.000043551838,0.0000021774028,0.000011105437,0.00017189377,0.000015456857,0.00003028763,0.00020601775,0.99747664,0.0000052515334],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.81339055,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9484158,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18660945,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010836548,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.027536415,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47945374},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2768530020","doi":"10.5539/jpl.v10n5p56","title":"Influence of the Decisions of the European Court of Human Rights on the Legal Order of Bosnia and Herzegovina in Terms of Exercising Same Sex Unions","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Politics and Law","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Convention; Publicity; Political science; Law; Context (archaeology); Fundamental rights; Order (exchange); International human rights law; Law and economics; Sociology; Business; Geography","score_opus":0.02360879527302272,"score_gpt":0.3155810714569732,"score_spread":0.29197227618395044,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2768530020","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.685587,0.0039161625,0.00095154403,0.018420098,0.0007054927,0.00010279754,0.00014864268,0.000012684645,0.2901555],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99399537,0.00033430193,0.0002511705,0.0017706628,0.00007925554,0.000019539839,0.000017825805,0.0000064835726,0.0035254173],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.988361,0.0045745885,0.0005843111,0.0015198872,0.001297922,0.0036622926],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99239576,0.0045600766,0.0009779775,0.0003850971,0.001009442,0.0006716373],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021288645,0.00026178866,0.0006311656,0.0012481689,0.006001081,0.011112902,0.001215451,0.0035753471,0.0050859405],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02440946,0.00033173437,0.0005260655,0.0009655913,0.007125533,0.0026094054,0.003963119,0.0041958676,0.00032248537],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004262598,0.00018111929,0.016423823,0.00012288404,0.0001307898,0.0014372823,0.013765447,0.0012464178,0.0021368817,0.9307802,0.0064452747,0.02690367],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008561608,0.0008664207,0.33875433,0.0024566513,0.0012290089,0.0013974903,0.06307713,0.0049545,0.01029122,0.2046668,0.37097484,0.00047538689],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.054030135,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.056927953,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.054030135,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010983699,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01137419,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1125865},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2768561102","doi":"10.5539/jpl.v10n5p116","title":"Brexit, Arbitration and Private International Law","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Politics and Law","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Brexit; European union; Conflict of laws; Law; Jurisdiction; Political science; International law; Scots law; Arbitration; European Union law; Common law; Enforcement; International trade; Sources of law; Economics","score_opus":0.025194250365299244,"score_gpt":0.3303375270903412,"score_spread":0.30514327672504193,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2768561102","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16005178,0.015377454,0.022330884,0.078427926,0.00041884824,0.0000792118,0.00011737298,0.000056803136,0.72313964],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97686166,0.001241592,0.0012363398,0.003467571,0.000102914746,0.0000528721,0.00002436675,0.000016452843,0.016996222],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9885262,0.006333255,0.0004618405,0.0011809493,0.0015073,0.0019904368],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9889942,0.006602801,0.0017225208,0.0013550413,0.0008383639,0.00048713008],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008839568,0.0002573048,0.00044873529,0.0011080428,0.00709178,0.011657273,0.0007874329,0.00616656,0.0052377605],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01846873,0.00037301268,0.0004969602,0.0013610641,0.030282846,0.009425674,0.0058988845,0.004907261,0.0005727114],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000045973657,0.000003922249,0.0002607305,0.0000054497013,0.0000011719789,0.000025293351,0.0007800041,0.00013179703,0.000014055132,0.99662364,0.0007601887,0.0013891439],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023978982,0.000027471546,0.001559061,0.00016273723,0.0000051267857,0.00010809892,0.0025962552,0.00094585,0.00016671976,0.9289129,0.06547029,0.000021613063],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011550503,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00891186,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011657273,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008371166,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005558047,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06073731},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2769365249","doi":"10.14453/ltc.735","title":"Law as Minor Jurisprudence: Is it a Mistake?","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Law/text/culture","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Mistake; Minor (academic); Jurisprudence; Law; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.033291896444684915,"score_gpt":0.3570352434425964,"score_spread":0.3237433469979115,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2769365249","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22944108,0.016939415,0.04145817,0.39907578,0.0025411735,0.000109514396,0.00005799843,0.00016282084,0.31021407],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9860389,0.0011307907,0.00237441,0.006008809,0.0004412179,0.000042390555,0.000014140438,0.00003996667,0.0039093522],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9800908,0.011862378,0.00066860823,0.0018741838,0.003646206,0.0018578012],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9722703,0.01636638,0.0032442682,0.0038594892,0.0027440046,0.0015155538],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011161694,0.0003804138,0.0009773388,0.002039639,0.0123992255,0.016719442,0.002609507,0.007687978,0.0018680779],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04380174,0.00040373855,0.0005370398,0.0022253098,0.10037932,0.020900272,0.0071941656,0.010473928,0.00035915204],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000049518762,0.0000108988725,0.0007521811,0.00003150489,0.0000031231748,0.00012997794,0.04436629,0.000041086045,0.000066383254,0.9475091,0.0014243266,0.0056601306],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000883996,0.000030424611,0.0018082228,0.00036090313,0.000010586345,0.0005098968,0.048761114,0.00067377725,0.00028262968,0.8750887,0.07243398,0.00003094313],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0075804656,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007194946,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016719442,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008148676,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0076970346,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05912304},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2769685875","doi":"","title":"The ongoing relationship of the common laws of England and Canada","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Bristol Research (University of Bristol)","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.04625337912484769,"score_gpt":0.3136928207869095,"score_spread":0.26743944166206185,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2769685875","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16255432,0.02452945,0.005135181,0.4244338,0.0019789494,0.00012120592,0.00065680774,0.000066987865,0.38052326],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93323827,0.0037310608,0.0012535697,0.01861016,0.00020801018,0.00005153968,0.000083517174,0.000049332546,0.04277452],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9733185,0.0049027223,0.000846319,0.0026919723,0.008535553,0.009704909],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9288931,0.028348012,0.00411211,0.0025903743,0.023420412,0.012636015],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01115307,0.00023544449,0.00096742966,0.0031238445,0.024356939,0.01964851,0.003856056,0.008384738,0.014321425],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05744113,0.00075135403,0.00046902144,0.005334517,0.026160916,0.006981258,0.007142403,0.011971257,0.00043855616],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003505902,0.000018060973,0.0031379028,0.0000789281,0.000027094664,0.0003035487,0.026033126,0.00030297143,0.000107660635,0.92109174,0.03367114,0.015192853],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004774994,0.00002367236,0.030718569,0.00091373286,0.000055076744,0.00021235202,0.08418494,0.0007215378,0.00024567975,0.11676103,0.7659328,0.00018285579],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98438174,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.992519,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13507298,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13507298,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2651044,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9800276},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2769961377","doi":"","title":"“LOVE WILL TEAR US APART” SOME THOUGHTS ON INTRAFAMILIAL TORTS AND FAMILY LAW MODERNIZATION BETWEEN ITALY AND CANADA","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Iris (Roma Tre University)","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tort; Law; Family law; Comparative law; Common law; Civil law (Civil law); Political science; Municipal law; Private law; Public law; Sociology; Liability","score_opus":0.015137105339160696,"score_gpt":0.22632354975131597,"score_spread":0.21118644441215528,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2769961377","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.64936274,0.0090656085,0.0005890573,0.08956827,0.00026206102,0.000043052907,0.0002397715,0.000026651769,0.25084284],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.988373,0.0016197568,0.00011540315,0.0025082882,0.000049561906,0.000007994181,0.000037783684,0.000010326598,0.007277928],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961927,0.00052274443,0.00004278788,0.00025707178,0.0005973228,0.0023874054],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972313,0.0006969438,0.00029832986,0.00011385283,0.000804287,0.0008551309],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002379106,0.00019453488,0.00032932282,0.0020501972,0.019643523,0.006995188,0.0020119327,0.0019376563,0.00469018],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004396586,0.0002521877,0.00040201758,0.003238448,0.018883524,0.0025046198,0.0038730297,0.0048869452,0.00012312907],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009383948,0.0000762751,0.0416001,0.000115783514,0.000046160592,0.0021914395,0.37051266,0.00047503185,0.0005360044,0.53463244,0.022231452,0.027488707],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024613897,0.000033705575,0.1320345,0.00058230315,0.000064553664,0.0007406301,0.5850796,0.00051844685,0.0005105203,0.011056061,0.26919854,0.00015655956],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98656917,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9924372,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.108354606,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.108354606,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08601281,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7861714},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2778109760","doi":"","title":"Canadian Bar Association. Meeting","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biographies | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Association (psychology); Bar (unit); Psychology; Geography; Meteorology","score_opus":0.008448659156581974,"score_gpt":0.22379385940653446,"score_spread":0.2153452002499525,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2778109760","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00026666748,0.0015454598,0.00012269108,0.005926594,0.008244217,0.00009812965,0.0043243826,0.00042602123,0.97904575],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.000624208,0.00044592482,0.0000844679,0.00079284096,0.00044001633,0.000025455007,0.0009780976,0.00007532057,0.99653375],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986603,0.000057971574,0.00002993253,0.00014570131,0.00080597086,0.00030012807],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980134,0.00007265203,0.000041645933,0.00007779861,0.0011275231,0.0006670343],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00065449823,0.0017336104,0.0008555872,0.0029603085,0.0057779863,0.0043466003,0.001930136,0.00395183,0.83938414],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018673436,0.00079778297,0.0009956649,0.0026517995,0.0006358842,0.0013054077,0.002454856,0.0031653426,0.72857404],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000122392685,0.000009578033,0.000055586792,0.000023725264,0.0000011968222,0.00001406551,0.0000051503916,0.0000145029635,0.00003383227,0.00029978264,0.98344326,0.016087027],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000052436994,0.0000031035881,0.0004601896,0.000026437014,0.0000013150245,0.000010316181,0.00003309291,0.000022027756,0.000014273196,0.00012774277,0.999292,0.000004232133],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3197007,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6288202,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99477553,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0052244957,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015260131,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6356796},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2780698079","doi":"10.1017/s2071832200022483","title":"Opening the Ranks of Constitutional Subjects: Immigration, Identity, and Innovation in Italy and Canada","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"German Law Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Immigration; Subjectivity; Identity (music); Political science; National identity; Sociology; Gender studies; Law; Aesthetics; Epistemology; Politics","score_opus":0.025786940089979612,"score_gpt":0.3309389715755926,"score_spread":0.305152031485613,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2780698079","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.75935113,0.0022087947,0.00039439023,0.011235004,0.00006907702,0.000047440408,0.00012965695,0.000019508348,0.22654511],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9908516,0.00064260804,0.00021285308,0.00051032956,0.000010345725,0.000016941658,0.000045968744,0.00000890016,0.007700453],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9945909,0.0006499589,0.00006186057,0.0003111811,0.0010338719,0.003352281],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99737096,0.0007922084,0.00025586193,0.00010682505,0.0005008234,0.0009733812],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002620931,0.0002974779,0.00047323704,0.002768924,0.02954471,0.011229234,0.0017258206,0.002029111,0.0038179092],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0063259476,0.00019483374,0.0004368546,0.005584595,0.023309883,0.002344736,0.00923255,0.0037011534,0.00013106779],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015913422,0.00009509522,0.052964065,0.00013457006,0.000026968633,0.0028896378,0.42120782,0.0008277044,0.00063135324,0.47317535,0.0093109,0.038577404],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000046895922,0.00004346381,0.10798082,0.000537435,0.00008521544,0.0005924792,0.67477095,0.0012139876,0.0005916861,0.01668001,0.19730048,0.00015658757],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99151796,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99646723,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1991611,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1991611,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.17250335,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9288596},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2785082277","doi":"","title":"Review of Authorities: Conflicts Cooperation and Transnational Legal Theory by Nicole Roughan","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Victoria","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law and economics; Law; Public administration; Sociology","score_opus":0.012191467901574661,"score_gpt":0.3128944338789071,"score_spread":0.3007029659773324,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2785082277","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00007427742,0.9886856,0.000115318064,0.007769608,0.0018926009,0.0000024511305,0.000009445115,0.0000023920197,0.0014483258],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0025198823,0.98897654,0.00018003462,0.0045633134,0.002827103,0.0000091025,0.000023112218,0.0000056176564,0.0008953281],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99805486,0.0008549218,0.00017261687,0.00022796707,0.0005798509,0.000109705834],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9919795,0.0055440855,0.00043507246,0.00015437025,0.0016508198,0.00023621587],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00293295,0.0007659588,0.0016797611,0.0047806413,0.0011240505,0.0029737246,0.0012163683,0.0025562807,0.0028533603],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011194523,0.00047645392,0.0004975688,0.0074561564,0.002884121,0.005070105,0.0018099664,0.0037399638,0.0011526737],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000679067,0.000030266478,0.00034817698,0.013422515,0.00011549887,0.00025108524,0.0010579358,0.000882215,0.00020137713,0.08961321,0.61454475,0.27946508],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009467494,0.000026051099,0.0007618011,0.010822763,0.000047701105,0.00028831715,0.0005871548,0.00009387115,0.000060947485,0.016732045,0.9705447,0.000025260717],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00904618,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013664346,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00904618,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002981288,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0072711813,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021630883},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2788291926","doi":"","title":"The England & Wales Court of Appeal refuses to expand the qualification of victim down the chain to the ultimate consumer (Air Canada / Emerald Supplies)","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"e-Competitions Bulletin","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Damages; Cartel; Law; Appeal; Federal court; New england; Business; High Court; Forensic engineering; Commerce; Supreme court; Engineering; Political science","score_opus":0.019761651201053766,"score_gpt":0.27995213601614233,"score_spread":0.26019048481508855,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2788291926","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.032735765,0.0021031003,0.0009933612,0.46826413,0.017301237,0.00054874003,0.0008435521,0.00023520234,0.47697493],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0797183,0.0008518197,0.0004890614,0.40088522,0.0026954368,0.0003813746,0.00019722064,0.00012445467,0.514657],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9908414,0.0006113277,0.000586037,0.0012075787,0.00221961,0.0045340704],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9907244,0.0035175746,0.00029373087,0.0005829054,0.0030503636,0.0018310657],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0046980088,0.0009719821,0.0022602936,0.0016466202,0.02547861,0.013472489,0.0047351685,0.07371433,0.03585766],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022364542,0.0028657562,0.002686572,0.0014588311,0.0053637843,0.005061172,0.005867062,0.050166085,0.011667507],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020564257,0.00018581872,0.003162238,0.00016065786,0.00010494883,0.0065632733,0.004688328,0.00024579023,0.0011214102,0.19503002,0.7769857,0.011546201],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015339292,0.000111186615,0.0075784335,0.0006720815,0.00013647784,0.0009732126,0.0064162672,0.00065917027,0.0005750188,0.017997174,0.96442854,0.00029907684],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.35394415,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.58693904,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.35394415,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015310954,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.037044335,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7037679},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2788528529","doi":"10.5287/ora-r5ky09kxg","title":"Private international law aspects of cross-border wrongs on the internet","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"Oxford University Research Archive (ORA) (University of Oxford)","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Choice of law; The Internet; Conflict of laws; Discretion; Law; Context (archaeology); Political science; Tort; Forum shopping; Common law; Legal aspects of computing; Geography; Computer science","score_opus":0.02515402789112517,"score_gpt":0.33671233908109827,"score_spread":0.3115583111899731,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2788528529","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.095632076,0.0046545914,0.014705849,0.020919088,0.0003091537,0.00009914182,0.00009360831,0.000064957996,0.8635216],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95299184,0.003085896,0.0030231604,0.0066741505,0.0005696027,0.00009705346,0.000057271372,0.00004736255,0.033453684],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9915183,0.0032562928,0.0005503003,0.00090703386,0.0022097721,0.0015582541],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9896147,0.0068089557,0.0008339969,0.0016945186,0.00073300616,0.00031491902],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0047917278,0.00033048433,0.00049038295,0.0012430227,0.0050448063,0.012332912,0.0014172129,0.012423417,0.0056972676],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014041172,0.0004860837,0.000832457,0.0017578547,0.017186178,0.00853582,0.005549767,0.008035684,0.0005940223],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007496307,0.00003167186,0.0007347363,0.000016077925,0.0000041407543,0.0004033465,0.0020961263,0.00039730925,0.00014612316,0.9891755,0.002337663,0.004649725],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002971624,0.00007854329,0.004590846,0.0005292375,0.000048082613,0.0016447195,0.00786178,0.0032942467,0.0011327165,0.8221462,0.15856268,0.00008136223],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006964224,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0053272634,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012423417,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003954357,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030996555,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.028690934},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2788772058","doi":"10.4172/2475-319x.1000133","title":"Innocent Suspects Lying by Omission","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Forensic Psychology","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Lying; Medicine","score_opus":0.02871784244804488,"score_gpt":0.38954189582274645,"score_spread":0.3608240533747016,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2788772058","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9498313,0.0018249667,0.0045183743,0.018076753,0.00034813362,0.0000890614,0.000061840765,0.000046216697,0.025203345],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967384,0.0003927013,0.00076003734,0.0009152831,0.000104687235,0.000019542273,0.00002113832,0.000009308638,0.0010389664],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.988118,0.0075577246,0.0007215501,0.0008484021,0.0017443927,0.0010098399],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95908004,0.018866466,0.0151412375,0.002831637,0.0026108737,0.0014697359],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0081023015,0.00034942062,0.00055072893,0.0016477612,0.004505359,0.0037532363,0.0008031,0.00257371,0.0028020353],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0897606,0.00045150146,0.00034835693,0.0006906735,0.00626551,0.003691355,0.0039682365,0.002764644,0.000589035],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0015157862,0.00026855362,0.32284114,0.0004475584,0.00011582147,0.03797202,0.42726555,0.00047877186,0.0034868068,0.06092349,0.017166123,0.12751843],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015245669,0.00090291555,0.12621412,0.003307011,0.0002872381,0.09912607,0.5374084,0.005414513,0.0061717085,0.1281857,0.09243735,0.0003924664],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027678302,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031096262,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0081023015,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013536667,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001533241,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04284954},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2789962272","doi":"10.1093/law/9780199678983.003.0004","title":"The Incidental Question","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Perspective (graphical); Conflict of laws; Political science; International law; Law; English law; Computer science","score_opus":0.027903546324027882,"score_gpt":0.26347178146017597,"score_spread":0.23556823513614808,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2789962272","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.017333407,0.005959272,0.022131866,0.021867227,0.0012256065,0.0000699926,0.00006917888,0.000043572527,0.93129987],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8601394,0.0048712594,0.005486186,0.014492768,0.0015364299,0.0002054325,0.00016185206,0.000113739734,0.1129929],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9934475,0.0030164311,0.00021788839,0.0008692961,0.0018947665,0.00055408984],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99521494,0.0030887956,0.00018063786,0.0007246949,0.00062241266,0.00016853894],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0048166183,0.0003876503,0.0006317776,0.0012488217,0.0038897088,0.0060495543,0.0014027354,0.0036796713,0.010444016],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010276921,0.00029182655,0.0005794532,0.0007760382,0.032127243,0.00881732,0.0052309353,0.007076385,0.0013637559],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000019438107,0.0000028765821,0.00005756655,0.000012726013,8.6363906e-7,0.000031246294,0.00074808375,0.000025155416,0.000022484855,0.9953376,0.0017302788,0.0020291382],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000043505556,0.000009201804,0.00021980911,0.00024020257,0.000004514742,0.00021972798,0.0018572235,0.00018333677,0.00016535162,0.81934124,0.17774653,0.000008505296],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0029418615,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002972608,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010444016,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004270515,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0041870605,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.034938693},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2790148011","doi":"10.17118/11143/11941","title":"La convention sur la protection des enfants et la coopération en matière d'adoption internationale et sa mise en œuvre en droit québécois","year":2005,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue de droit Université de Sherbrooke","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Institut National de la Recherche Scientifique","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Art","score_opus":0.011080558277926885,"score_gpt":0.24372276978766982,"score_spread":0.23264221150974293,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2790148011","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07347609,0.066791415,0.010255308,0.2550287,0.0073027858,0.0006402731,0.0030414711,0.00033811497,0.5831258],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.30250832,0.015584975,0.012857228,0.023450233,0.00065117236,0.0006549575,0.0010654517,0.00017279881,0.6430548],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99261487,0.0019178756,0.00043740153,0.00047911788,0.0029506858,0.0016001071],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99149257,0.0019230676,0.0007101836,0.00068353035,0.0037397323,0.0014509127],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00927741,0.00067724846,0.00064874196,0.0012081037,0.006330313,0.0051823105,0.001713713,0.0055234497,0.011730297],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012324753,0.0004783691,0.00057656475,0.0015808707,0.00512878,0.0019487122,0.0025914663,0.0068216156,0.00096987723],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017472409,0.00010610132,0.009863609,0.00040148714,0.000056758698,0.000835991,0.020060668,0.0006738023,0.0038628597,0.49286965,0.3440838,0.12701052],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021519725,0.000039471517,0.018302375,0.00048071885,0.00001565438,0.00011064815,0.001992839,0.00014910295,0.0005414139,0.0038780177,0.974409,0.00005925213],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9359801,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.94707704,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06401992,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03509809,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1292047,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25465566},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2790327354","doi":"","title":"Introduction to Quebec law","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.010565973658349104,"score_gpt":0.24119502587250896,"score_spread":0.23062905221415986,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2790327354","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.001968475,0.036848716,0.0006975869,0.014937656,0.0020829933,0.000091733804,0.0035037738,0.0002445927,0.9396244],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.015029096,0.010937378,0.00063486164,0.0027551923,0.00026175685,0.000057813602,0.00081032445,0.00008241699,0.96943116],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992267,0.00009097713,0.000023247483,0.000087649365,0.0003789216,0.00019259933],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994048,0.000089641595,0.00001898816,0.000035230925,0.00036485196,0.00008655001],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000531062,0.00092703296,0.00053906866,0.004004863,0.0080259675,0.005561909,0.0012400764,0.0019776516,0.18064232],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0018418955,0.0005538672,0.00058151357,0.0053032106,0.0019793136,0.0020556473,0.0010155737,0.0028142503,0.016518978],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009027039,0.000022721608,0.0005137814,0.00009173336,0.0000046729137,0.000098237644,0.0005719264,0.0001968135,0.000054038515,0.07051723,0.88096464,0.046955153],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000017156233,0.0000024950177,0.0013114953,0.00009469793,0.0000018627142,0.000029073468,0.00027029467,0.000052465013,0.00001793949,0.0015613846,0.9966486,0.00000788445],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97743636,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98884916,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18064232,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.052806105,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.043615308,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6043087},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2790639434","doi":"","title":"Ottawa law review special issue","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.014281023691317672,"score_gpt":0.262344268986645,"score_spread":0.2480632452953273,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2790639434","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0014203428,0.12777169,0.00032603164,0.0836115,0.014526941,0.00028510168,0.018555008,0.0006316944,0.7528717],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.008398779,0.040498044,0.0004619859,0.013922797,0.0017027173,0.00021761871,0.0035273554,0.00023436133,0.93103635],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9948403,0.00022041454,0.00030795808,0.00032665936,0.0033535552,0.0009509984],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9896137,0.0014170227,0.0003386664,0.0005859261,0.007131023,0.0009136649],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018357465,0.0009356184,0.0014496421,0.009260958,0.010624892,0.012352262,0.0032100591,0.0066758087,0.19824262],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00999923,0.0015946256,0.0012945522,0.012443452,0.0029884158,0.0034685142,0.0019460716,0.0050152526,0.048983984],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011720502,0.000009918566,0.000152909,0.00016392556,0.0000069928396,0.000021125552,0.000042188232,0.000030576637,0.000020088155,0.006131048,0.98265314,0.010756512],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008356487,0.0000034398167,0.0014457842,0.00043811116,0.000023300117,0.000019212855,0.00014578582,0.000024976669,0.000045969715,0.0009921001,0.99683326,0.00001967645],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.91543764,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9719757,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9337561,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06624389,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.16321912,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6631876},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2791241774","doi":"","title":"University of British Columbia law review centennial edition.","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Centennial; Law; History; Political science; Archaeology","score_opus":0.010110544497024655,"score_gpt":0.2089371662173512,"score_spread":0.19882662172032656,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2791241774","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0007520338,0.19111341,0.00043200946,0.032492775,0.010471634,0.00013324161,0.028061038,0.00048476062,0.73605907],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.006086743,0.05739111,0.00039181364,0.0044419267,0.0008693789,0.000115359944,0.005686878,0.0001644823,0.9248524],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99864453,0.00006165391,0.00009339938,0.00009034096,0.00088952616,0.0002205407],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953165,0.0004229487,0.00015040241,0.0002147754,0.0035420677,0.0003532504],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010740351,0.00081739324,0.0008650256,0.00621316,0.0033027173,0.0050093695,0.0013961204,0.0027282087,0.16351429],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005140877,0.0008406446,0.00037555117,0.01118566,0.0011152102,0.0021937569,0.0009425692,0.002643729,0.05750921],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000038715525,0.0000034792986,0.00006530024,0.00008583638,0.0000011064345,0.000010411009,0.000019932268,0.00001729372,0.000012191092,0.0012139366,0.9851304,0.013436285],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000023207763,0.0000015764709,0.0013676139,0.00035260228,0.0000037401444,0.000017671833,0.00006144146,0.000015221307,0.000021864362,0.00038292375,0.9977683,0.0000047323256],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.77711374,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9287947,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9812548,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018745193,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.041103818,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5470098},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2791279621","doi":"","title":"Canadian law, fifth edition.","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; History","score_opus":0.01244289478975106,"score_gpt":0.23693130776376556,"score_spread":0.2244884129740145,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2791279621","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0007061026,0.11163063,0.00083236926,0.016857468,0.0036009585,0.00007147391,0.014467782,0.00062917743,0.85120404],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.009951186,0.04937513,0.0012899874,0.003460297,0.00058893295,0.00006867103,0.0044453,0.00021229265,0.93060815],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99880147,0.000035321853,0.000036583355,0.00008076499,0.00086305564,0.00018281407],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981989,0.00012152799,0.0000510169,0.00006909443,0.0013844423,0.00017498861],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006090759,0.0011120802,0.000638799,0.0046464987,0.005810041,0.005485439,0.0020073452,0.0019185334,0.11962406],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0032939075,0.000809337,0.00044952345,0.0084175775,0.0019319832,0.0027937747,0.00096673163,0.0019843008,0.030878779],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000035804198,0.0000040718965,0.00011468653,0.00006153844,0.0000011680918,0.000017610355,0.00013757449,0.00004120407,0.000025958054,0.010552912,0.9692592,0.01978031],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000010364187,9.0553783e-7,0.0005227546,0.00008494062,0.0000015279938,0.000019102557,0.00012108322,0.000018194529,0.000016205868,0.0010686469,0.99814117,0.0000043834766],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95677567,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98617864,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11962406,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.047392063,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07291769,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.40018237},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2791684113","doi":"","title":"Damages for Breach and Interpretation of Jurisdiction Agreements in Common Law Canada","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Damages; Jurisprudence; Law; Subject-matter jurisdiction; Interpretation (philosophy); Enforcement; Political science; Common law; Conflict of laws; Business; Original jurisdiction; Computer science","score_opus":0.026790064369380216,"score_gpt":0.3329113235339074,"score_spread":0.3061212591645272,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2791684113","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.055359602,0.13454168,0.008267022,0.114709914,0.0015697554,0.0002303182,0.0005392315,0.00010122771,0.68468124],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.899329,0.042163804,0.004408362,0.014512757,0.00035267023,0.000074735515,0.00021138148,0.00005433066,0.038892925],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9768604,0.003600038,0.0009324728,0.0012586433,0.013318523,0.0040299944],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9804977,0.005691717,0.0010054668,0.000574027,0.011108263,0.0011228924],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012517277,0.0003492804,0.0006812234,0.00637615,0.017295271,0.013606417,0.0029116992,0.004971311,0.0037287273],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027347906,0.0005084671,0.0006307708,0.008190555,0.020582456,0.0030665405,0.0035873745,0.0054976027,0.00025258353],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000062588715,0.000010510385,0.0010717593,0.00012795956,0.000015114558,0.00020651953,0.0048698587,0.00057736575,0.000069695794,0.9554046,0.021484986,0.016155418],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021430436,0.000028701004,0.013417323,0.0022172593,0.000103092265,0.00027879517,0.0136271985,0.0016501789,0.0004349923,0.21152078,0.75651425,0.00018602908],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9778496,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98515785,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16139922,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.16139922,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.29285917,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97265804},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2791850572","doi":"","title":"Canada Law Book Limited.","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biographies | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.013927806475409015,"score_gpt":0.24334327731679034,"score_spread":0.22941547084138134,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2791850572","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00020750749,0.0027858764,0.00022169654,0.0017563357,0.00020980262,0.00004294322,0.005179963,0.0002815913,0.9893142],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0013031448,0.0013552577,0.00018707452,0.0005914647,0.000027198384,0.000019013316,0.0012811051,0.00011808729,0.9951178],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988129,0.000033092063,0.00002768888,0.00012186523,0.0008326858,0.00017176446],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982609,0.00017928382,0.00004603252,0.000116103256,0.0012197731,0.00017792595],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00040464732,0.00097197515,0.00063231005,0.00320687,0.0066974745,0.0053403424,0.001560418,0.002649199,0.4648454],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026563862,0.0010557586,0.0004027616,0.006240345,0.0011195862,0.0025140007,0.0012820245,0.0025554954,0.23109795],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000056434396,0.0000071719037,0.00009561755,0.00004800282,0.0000010543831,0.000023143464,0.000070090726,0.000041965708,0.00005997453,0.011263397,0.96363276,0.024751302],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000014594762,0.0000011169626,0.00027899616,0.000050723764,0.0000011922261,0.000014838734,0.000055587625,0.00002919423,0.000035647572,0.0006401536,0.9988871,0.0000039173997],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8870646,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9680569,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4648454,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01948169,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.035389677,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7633331},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2792079564","doi":"10.11575/prism/34157","title":"Pure economic loss claims","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PRISM (University of Calgary)","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Economics","score_opus":0.01216955272951178,"score_gpt":0.2269849192101994,"score_spread":0.2148153664806876,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2792079564","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013989553,0.0033645297,0.021477928,0.008322746,0.0009937229,0.00016832381,0.0003599105,0.00019551581,0.9511277],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6520579,0.0049123024,0.008184204,0.009285117,0.0028492096,0.00055098266,0.0006645409,0.00027385977,0.3212218],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9894488,0.0015128445,0.0005781657,0.0014311731,0.0055151707,0.0015138404],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9916136,0.0028337776,0.00060971634,0.0022342126,0.0023221266,0.000386568],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007527572,0.0016576793,0.0010548598,0.004386331,0.0050968,0.013325318,0.0038688525,0.008065409,0.029841684],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022558738,0.00080365,0.0013120008,0.0021391963,0.009925339,0.011245457,0.010587119,0.007532643,0.008701635],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000052449373,0.000049456732,0.0006063439,0.00007813957,0.000025728408,0.0006542291,0.00046434966,0.0003349258,0.0002236708,0.96355903,0.017511658,0.016439946],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000459234,0.000051403666,0.00079666264,0.0004458613,0.000052315336,0.0014727989,0.0004794448,0.0018002009,0.0008075106,0.7679869,0.22600918,0.000051900093],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0018285608,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0012771885,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.029841684,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003676461,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029683176,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09983039},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2792770270","doi":"","title":"Canada: The British Columbia Court of Appeal refuses to rule on a class action of indirect purchasers (Sun-Rype Products/Archer Daniels Midland ; Pro Sys Consultants/Microsoft Corporation )","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Concurrences Review","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Class action; Law; Corporation; Political science; Humanities; Sociology; Art; Computer science","score_opus":0.07854447336416934,"score_gpt":0.3345121602147928,"score_spread":0.25596768685062343,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2792770270","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.044399686,0.013028331,0.0023536123,0.26333433,0.009744796,0.00092032633,0.0056061363,0.0004061079,0.6602066],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.18112095,0.0052799615,0.002412566,0.20759764,0.00054443657,0.00045556523,0.0010705467,0.00016894151,0.60134935],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98830914,0.0005835109,0.00062894117,0.0013148731,0.005032407,0.0041311886],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9873984,0.0029350433,0.000369391,0.0005552879,0.007561643,0.001180286],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0053908024,0.000835929,0.0010042082,0.0027615381,0.024392432,0.008704309,0.0047542253,0.02083926,0.021523673],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017459556,0.0017412025,0.0015413704,0.0036527226,0.0046429215,0.002372438,0.0023982862,0.019948417,0.0030444032],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000069886824,0.000055266897,0.0052533527,0.00025538317,0.000089464134,0.00096682104,0.0034512032,0.0001559351,0.00072282186,0.12874159,0.8398859,0.02035238],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009711843,0.00002537819,0.01431397,0.000783811,0.00023196582,0.00028279508,0.0049052285,0.00029355683,0.0012939662,0.0059695113,0.9716069,0.00019580872],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98905396,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99629164,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.074190766,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.074190766,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2062553,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5382942},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2793490968","doi":"","title":"Canada : La Cour d'appel de la Colombie-Britannique refuse de certifier un recours collectif des acheteurs indirects (Sun-Rype Products Ltd. v. Archer Daniels Midland Company - Pro Sys Consultants Ltd. v. Microsoft Corporation )","year":2012,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue Concurrences","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04645014931346661,"score_gpt":0.30500126485241574,"score_spread":0.25855111553894916,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2793490968","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17449915,0.010393167,0.0022653067,0.035020385,0.0009601416,0.0003882093,0.002443331,0.00012865808,0.7739016],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.648113,0.0032157295,0.0016478586,0.0044399165,0.000060980565,0.000097955584,0.00034170563,0.00008930252,0.34199363],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.996847,0.0002668143,0.00013212423,0.00038887467,0.0012034104,0.0011616974],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971252,0.0005507188,0.0002674238,0.0001546429,0.0013829439,0.00051909185],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015678147,0.0004487791,0.00026693585,0.0012764321,0.016923225,0.0060306746,0.0015370366,0.0022926256,0.026778752],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003505285,0.00043407176,0.00031684025,0.0030208058,0.0060315235,0.001284351,0.0023215793,0.0026961572,0.001361094],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017074234,0.00004610973,0.04486965,0.0008043624,0.000102065416,0.003607652,0.11302097,0.0003957408,0.0038162149,0.568919,0.181423,0.0828245],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012662938,0.00002473766,0.05698069,0.00037900594,0.00003413755,0.00038649037,0.030040242,0.00012680166,0.00073824805,0.0020023808,0.9091912,0.00008331128],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98538476,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99581295,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.059427265,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.059427265,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08803196,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.43117696},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2793750418","doi":"","title":"Constitutional law: a charter litigation manual: Canadian Bar Association - Ontario, 1992 Institute of Continuing Legal [...]","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Books | Encyclopedia of Canadian Laws","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Charter; Political science; Constitutional law","score_opus":0.010650670112996894,"score_gpt":0.23302150666323432,"score_spread":0.22237083655023743,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2793750418","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0029891718,0.05311484,0.0059556607,0.050585087,0.0030440595,0.001020976,0.07359395,0.0017005097,0.8079957],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.031072238,0.033591874,0.0121676745,0.005632243,0.0006306595,0.00058618386,0.02662378,0.0008353877,0.88886],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9959888,0.00017275983,0.00019401748,0.00021247026,0.0030556775,0.0003763323],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99337643,0.00086389156,0.0002211483,0.00023602418,0.004963924,0.00033866632],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031561567,0.0013310044,0.00061903195,0.00676191,0.010707872,0.0066605057,0.00277298,0.003471362,0.0845501],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009158759,0.0015661943,0.00045609733,0.013939743,0.0044752047,0.0055134664,0.0015191054,0.0035949294,0.020912701],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000058333167,0.000009639827,0.00031607854,0.00005607394,0.0000013284306,0.000022412843,0.00042105417,0.00008906642,0.00005371406,0.011484402,0.96827334,0.019267159],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008862552,0.000003639644,0.0058372146,0.00018913855,0.000004836999,0.000032242035,0.0006680035,0.000112656446,0.00008395767,0.0030335651,0.9900023,0.000023667055],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97547126,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99209315,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.94027245,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.059727527,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12707444,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.43335557},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2795200660","doi":"","title":"Accès - Secteur public : La Cour de cassation rejette le pourvoi dans l'affaire de l'accès à l'Abattoir de Laval (Privileg...)","year":2006,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue Concurrences","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.024188158784894494,"score_gpt":0.2793382239535228,"score_spread":0.2551500651686283,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2795200660","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10348446,0.008117577,0.0020906357,0.24893682,0.0032953036,0.000111202,0.00023787978,0.00009008652,0.63363606],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.79119337,0.0013851782,0.00038968486,0.02184415,0.00080554065,0.000056746176,0.00003990689,0.000046180972,0.18423912],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968388,0.00087273994,0.00009403684,0.00032390168,0.0007919972,0.0010784847],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99729675,0.0011395253,0.0002875126,0.00013822,0.00054115633,0.00059681066],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035816587,0.00021440741,0.00020293762,0.0004430664,0.012823773,0.0077034617,0.0007687232,0.0073942975,0.010731031],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007260224,0.00032196622,0.00033286438,0.0006538078,0.0076727946,0.0034864878,0.0054254252,0.0080451695,0.0007453233],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000059762595,0.000031485073,0.0033212018,0.000046485355,0.0000126098885,0.0007796958,0.038902536,0.00009573735,0.00047868083,0.87333626,0.073387794,0.009547836],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002453356,0.000047345224,0.013852477,0.00016041294,0.000017197384,0.0003609126,0.02194403,0.00014762634,0.00055107835,0.023803435,0.93904895,0.00004199337],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.17410296,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.32428476,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17410296,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0128263375,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015836313,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34617913},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2795599869","doi":"10.29173/alr1318","title":"From Many Different Stones: A House of Justice","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Globe; Law; Human rights; Economic Justice; Political science; Globalization; Supreme court; International law; International court; Sociology; Law and economics; Public international law; Psychology","score_opus":0.029136999425136954,"score_gpt":0.32090465755887626,"score_spread":0.2917676581337393,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2795599869","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0021866043,0.021245414,0.0012393687,0.8661506,0.010594152,0.000035956156,0.000045845605,0.00003591955,0.09846609],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.09763554,0.008280539,0.0015316479,0.6032995,0.004210309,0.00013855805,0.00004825378,0.00010821654,0.28474742],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99491334,0.0013705298,0.00012432085,0.000601701,0.00152328,0.0014668393],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967083,0.0014294821,0.000100685495,0.00016364126,0.00079095794,0.00080693135],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0047736885,0.0004979408,0.0007478801,0.0011417826,0.026872663,0.014838799,0.0024077054,0.015034331,0.010479884],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0120182615,0.000452626,0.00067108596,0.0012352166,0.0149861295,0.009754917,0.005866665,0.017876377,0.0020319053],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010361255,0.000019622757,0.0002532563,0.000023745302,0.0000050321446,0.0003244133,0.0043804445,0.00007688681,0.00006518222,0.47430143,0.50493294,0.015606691],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008991409,0.000008183822,0.00041787096,0.00019113919,0.0000062236672,0.00009771562,0.007579767,0.000089142304,0.000055504544,0.06454445,0.92698306,0.000017962228],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2159542,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.31623158,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2159542,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015166612,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.029771188,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42939436},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2796507726","doi":"10.1017/s0069005800008201","title":"L’offense aux souverains et chefs de gouvernement étrangers par la voie de la presse. Par Jean-F. Marinus. Collection de droit international, Éditions Bruylant. Bruxelles: Éditions de l’Université de Bruxelles, 2002. 587 pp.","year":2003,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Yearbook of international Law/Annuaire canadien de droit international","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Art","score_opus":0.00768690730649266,"score_gpt":0.2343184618051722,"score_spread":0.22663155449867955,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2796507726","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0019058147,0.8294098,0.0008327412,0.037447467,0.005429526,0.000022125216,0.002438832,0.00014191061,0.12237182],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.047358908,0.43413806,0.0023540354,0.005556154,0.0033048028,0.00009252863,0.003050616,0.00041002574,0.50373495],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988368,0.00023349274,0.00009698577,0.00016622189,0.0005098907,0.00015654344],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990381,0.00034836557,0.0001938064,0.00006687232,0.0002782438,0.000074694864],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010207021,0.0013122932,0.0006188122,0.004084734,0.002213676,0.0056141904,0.0010638047,0.0020058528,0.063355505],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025038158,0.00090840267,0.00052931247,0.007318152,0.0019729994,0.0058515808,0.0015369493,0.0033256758,0.015655879],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030079156,0.00002005315,0.0007798164,0.00034314554,0.000014038355,0.000061489816,0.0017424815,0.00009359371,0.00015880552,0.019835494,0.8864759,0.09044515],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000043882033,0.000006146774,0.003991988,0.0004739113,0.0000040092227,0.00011759742,0.00064524997,0.000030466384,0.00013070187,0.0016184807,0.9929669,0.0000102923095],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.23783225,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.33073834,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23783225,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0052989135,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0043583307,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4728958},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2799673227","doi":"10.7202/1044707ar","title":"ANALYSE CRITIQUE DE L’INTERVENTION NOTARIALE DANS LES RELATIONS JURIDIQUES INTERNATIONALES ISSUES DE L’IMMIGRATION AU QUÉBEC","year":2013,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue du notariat","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.01662808653333349,"score_gpt":0.3016808259440576,"score_spread":0.2850527394107241,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2799673227","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.047642376,0.028077388,0.006247246,0.5343737,0.0028959308,0.00018184017,0.00022311085,0.00005147791,0.38030693],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8350631,0.008165768,0.002605777,0.05239944,0.0008654102,0.00026292226,0.00008645535,0.00006116529,0.10049004],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9821437,0.0068914113,0.000407495,0.0010190412,0.006111367,0.0034270533],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97718185,0.009743788,0.0009076542,0.00082170614,0.010126667,0.0012183342],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020840067,0.00043955393,0.00059427455,0.0021297347,0.018836103,0.008603077,0.0029652216,0.007691828,0.008668804],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030608166,0.00038421404,0.00070911064,0.002246761,0.022269567,0.0029084382,0.004560818,0.009116272,0.00046568515],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000047695332,0.000037711514,0.0017573336,0.00023185261,0.000028367042,0.00020636627,0.038215227,0.00074767106,0.00032005456,0.84144944,0.087045535,0.029912861],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008210146,0.000051473904,0.016168589,0.0018669096,0.000102223115,0.0001813593,0.0331945,0.0010658294,0.0009265025,0.06671699,0.87954605,0.00009754123],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.90332097,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9211689,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10064788,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10064788,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.16122983,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7302549},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2802060371","doi":"10.7202/1044791ar","title":"LES SUCCESSIONS EN DROIT INTERNATIONAL PRIVÉ QUÉBÉCOIS","year":2010,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue du notariat","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.01454646757391599,"score_gpt":0.2898997815445691,"score_spread":0.2753533139706531,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2802060371","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8281077,0.0069771996,0.0012926871,0.010756395,0.0009028293,0.00010149205,0.0018896342,0.00009275488,0.14987934],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.849911,0.002087124,0.00059246854,0.0006450685,0.00013304385,0.000047332862,0.0005546648,0.000035205707,0.14599419],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984692,0.0002481044,0.000040731662,0.00012030048,0.00030144825,0.00082023913],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99775225,0.0002568969,0.0002940723,0.00007724727,0.0005567589,0.0010627636],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009637213,0.0005381551,0.0003668341,0.0011871024,0.007427532,0.0027245083,0.0005914307,0.001277172,0.020170277],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0036155237,0.00023621261,0.0004063015,0.0020088407,0.0022088499,0.0012017986,0.0011372794,0.002949048,0.00094146526],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0016255046,0.00073546916,0.24653646,0.00054544304,0.00031345332,0.010234605,0.052901957,0.0059964387,0.008228971,0.31904122,0.14445743,0.20938301],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000087728644,0.00017172552,0.53586555,0.00025132627,0.00003125431,0.001150327,0.022326851,0.0011224673,0.0009997074,0.0027123985,0.43520728,0.00007338277],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9449228,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9694117,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.055077195,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.024072768,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.021381646,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17466098},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2804077329","doi":"10.1017/s0069005800007487","title":"Canadian Cases in Private International Law in 1999-2000 / La jurisprudence canadienne en matière de droit international privé en 1999-2000","year":2001,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Yearbook of international Law/Annuaire canadien de droit international","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Jurisprudence; Law; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.006873410630274624,"score_gpt":0.24527255307748072,"score_spread":0.23839914244720609,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2804077329","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14852661,0.01593552,0.0006080878,0.045069188,0.000749113,0.00020461943,0.010118154,0.00014438243,0.7786443],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7033956,0.009618105,0.0010174306,0.008444981,0.00017533268,0.00011150532,0.0033723179,0.000100038174,0.27376467],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9936593,0.00022566509,0.00011594506,0.00027428323,0.003452195,0.0022725635],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9944448,0.001229797,0.00044871867,0.000241661,0.0024774538,0.001157688],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029695737,0.0003741254,0.00049917446,0.00418791,0.018629253,0.00790627,0.0018585569,0.0031454933,0.011013566],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012590568,0.0006518566,0.00040399958,0.011415767,0.0042912858,0.0015188218,0.0026096522,0.0034547776,0.00060257403],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013478776,0.00007837986,0.012254577,0.00027035648,0.00004179904,0.0009441212,0.018999834,0.0008014743,0.00035447048,0.48895314,0.43985212,0.037314955],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004282856,0.00001634309,0.07696666,0.0002909663,0.000052286123,0.00018817665,0.010617274,0.00057920214,0.00050789287,0.0050385995,0.9056179,0.000081859056],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9977654,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99914765,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.77731246,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.22268756,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.18036152,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9015722},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2804081601","doi":"10.1017/s0069005800008420","title":"Canadian Cases in Private International Lawin 2002-3 / Jurisprudence canadienne en matière de droit international privé en 2002-3","year":2004,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Jurisprudence; Law","score_opus":0.010428720427029399,"score_gpt":0.2702190700593593,"score_spread":0.2597903496323299,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2804081601","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19088718,0.008695218,0.0009955758,0.07995711,0.0011284613,0.00029519468,0.002661007,0.00014734734,0.7152329],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.61020386,0.0027952462,0.001048122,0.024982195,0.00027607934,0.00014815266,0.0006604785,0.00012199845,0.3597638],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98718137,0.00077642925,0.00027722193,0.00077483366,0.004888766,0.00610139],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99322283,0.0023709293,0.00041010915,0.00032990333,0.002137271,0.0015289406],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0052896747,0.00064165913,0.0009499056,0.0035492193,0.03505507,0.0146009065,0.0031523171,0.012495093,0.012773503],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015901683,0.001359909,0.0010882056,0.007667576,0.007666093,0.0022837438,0.005395918,0.012170433,0.0006343225],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016277989,0.00014679608,0.0075743445,0.0001594116,0.000068221096,0.0022354953,0.018979717,0.00097444037,0.00067677477,0.78579694,0.17013277,0.01309223],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000120998426,0.000039578532,0.0349459,0.0002531904,0.000094586445,0.00039707546,0.013714895,0.0008035217,0.0010847466,0.009373127,0.9390069,0.00016547818],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9944661,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.997505,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20284355,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.20284355,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.18816449,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9245885},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2804823524","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.3260","title":"Three Objections to Forum of Necessity: Global Access to Justice, International Criminal Law, and Proper Party","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Rehabilitation Institute","funders":"","keywords":"Plaintiff; Jurisdiction; Law; Adjudication; Political science; Tort; Liability; Civil procedure; Forum shopping; Economic Justice; Business","score_opus":0.046513576739178324,"score_gpt":0.3678885889683903,"score_spread":0.32137501222921194,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2804823524","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05185289,0.007333583,0.027905578,0.4204592,0.0033545936,0.00020738761,0.00027741844,0.0001595216,0.4884498],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87221235,0.0028476932,0.012164622,0.079402305,0.0023233665,0.00047972862,0.00012914516,0.00010614705,0.03033467],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9861196,0.0035477928,0.00068224047,0.001733367,0.0051781116,0.0027387831],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97945285,0.0130395815,0.0016525869,0.0020493942,0.0018243687,0.0019811725],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017710466,0.00071134797,0.000992432,0.0020899542,0.012453236,0.013783666,0.004335374,0.025702247,0.008579534],"category_scores_gemma":[0.036931496,0.000559536,0.0012177686,0.0020228415,0.075613245,0.02058003,0.011680953,0.020452566,0.00087559037],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000060438515,0.000004679707,0.00010165925,0.00001143696,0.0000011766201,0.000024020439,0.0011195936,0.00001938294,0.000016890435,0.9955154,0.0021954307,0.0009844103],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000056902005,0.000021002425,0.0009169552,0.00026287747,0.00002239764,0.00017325647,0.003801277,0.0003152722,0.00027698374,0.92335904,0.0707346,0.000059366943],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.066685654,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06087169,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.066685654,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01081426,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020323768,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.132595},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2805493865","doi":"","title":"LibGuides: Canada Legal Research Guide: Case Law","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"libguides","venue":"","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Legal research","score_opus":0.06150004744115774,"score_gpt":0.3902384504438241,"score_spread":0.3287384030026664,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2805493865","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004163697,0.015478927,0.0028498273,0.023589969,0.0014267764,0.0015228248,0.05171495,0.0014160958,0.8978368],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.015197679,0.011758135,0.011127056,0.0050591775,0.0001573065,0.0011096611,0.014672243,0.00064326363,0.94027555],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.996151,0.00044934795,0.00031703134,0.0001778953,0.0023099391,0.0005948296],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98304635,0.0025528572,0.0004151506,0.00038904004,0.012659899,0.0009366834],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004649954,0.0012202007,0.0008571449,0.01219168,0.010656859,0.008864566,0.0034750553,0.0042524883,0.0984197],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017398084,0.0015670604,0.00069481187,0.018216634,0.0031391869,0.0038309894,0.0020896033,0.0039148754,0.019642273],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008522943,0.000020937156,0.00045240863,0.00011035625,0.000002200795,0.000039487975,0.00033353287,0.000101367834,0.000025556357,0.013508913,0.9640834,0.021313405],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013524615,0.000004536123,0.004286031,0.0006307873,0.000010015515,0.00006316107,0.0016109231,0.0002102929,0.00013339688,0.0036981208,0.98930246,0.000036590256],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9732635,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9925303,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0984197,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06957622,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.24844696,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5048132},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2808153947","doi":"10.11575/prism/29095","title":"O'Reilly v. Director, Southern Region, Regional Services, Alberta Environment","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PRISM (University of Calgary)","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Telecommunications; Public administration; Political science; Engineering","score_opus":0.008305067575239697,"score_gpt":0.18504990313494551,"score_spread":0.17674483555970583,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2808153947","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009279951,0.011633441,0.00081203354,0.061927788,0.002368322,0.00014699828,0.0013241938,0.0004283452,0.9120789],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.04855172,0.0047122226,0.0007270391,0.017766474,0.00018189843,0.000036133566,0.00034971707,0.00007334048,0.9276016],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990441,0.00005788058,0.000018594836,0.00008050896,0.00046581082,0.00033314232],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979849,0.0003284434,0.000052535957,0.000050014267,0.0010167656,0.0005673613],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000785493,0.00042184847,0.00023437616,0.00063723134,0.00562766,0.0026987586,0.00094234076,0.003030126,0.059090964],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020140046,0.00046743365,0.00019542857,0.00088054664,0.0010007255,0.00090075046,0.0008734821,0.0035037633,0.0060506156],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005118014,0.000026365939,0.0028731807,0.000070052025,0.000005187223,0.0003587459,0.0003684882,0.00016435176,0.0004620476,0.015285412,0.9499324,0.030402593],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029567005,0.000018117024,0.010496204,0.00011954943,0.000014779408,0.00016688216,0.0008227706,0.00015429899,0.0004632149,0.0013132641,0.98637855,0.000022853932],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.81622785,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.94467455,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18377215,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0077678612,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.045012664,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36970878},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2809508227","doi":"","title":"The Divergent Paths of Commonwealth Privacy Torts","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Commonwealth; Political science; Law; Common law; Jurisprudence; Context (archaeology); Privacy policy; Privacy law; Normative; English law; Harmonization; Information privacy; Law and economics; Sociology; Geography","score_opus":0.013567864239714175,"score_gpt":0.30299308994022567,"score_spread":0.2894252257005115,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2809508227","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.34838843,0.0059761773,0.036137845,0.04857933,0.00019742132,0.0001619412,0.00015675684,0.00008110991,0.560321],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97956306,0.0011553651,0.0025783246,0.0019780244,0.000032869844,0.000072347975,0.000026573636,0.000032105287,0.014561327],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9881076,0.0053119124,0.00043496056,0.0012826491,0.0028020777,0.0020607503],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99271214,0.003922928,0.0006907202,0.00091373443,0.0010801061,0.00068040856],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0074954936,0.00022566106,0.00034617324,0.0025827289,0.008316966,0.011073921,0.0010491027,0.0031491197,0.0034062865],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018077608,0.00058873673,0.0005983328,0.0016733347,0.038553555,0.010030773,0.010648637,0.0053938534,0.00034072984],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000061430037,0.00000454433,0.0005851352,0.0000072849793,0.0000028497716,0.00006771035,0.008161417,0.00007301628,0.000051156978,0.98775023,0.00037964305,0.0029109172],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003299378,0.000041258038,0.010314495,0.00034674202,0.000037142312,0.0004153546,0.022671742,0.0009210594,0.0006317334,0.83522016,0.129306,0.00006132235],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.037448812,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.034575652,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.037448812,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010265807,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0077824616,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07448405},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2810951285","doi":"","title":"Ward v. Canada (Attorney General)","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Betascript Publishing eBooks","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.019715544655884546,"score_gpt":0.24433362194941793,"score_spread":0.2246180772935334,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2810951285","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0014017284,0.0056065232,0.0001891082,0.0087045,0.0005851022,0.00005528729,0.00089775823,0.00010571844,0.98245424],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.010631254,0.0017937137,0.00016469124,0.007994989,0.000070040376,0.000029381277,0.00021787811,0.000047754143,0.9790502],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99842983,0.000051429368,0.000030216816,0.00011060972,0.0007779884,0.0005998639],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99925,0.0000973101,0.00002078626,0.000028681017,0.0004776062,0.0001256792],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00054715533,0.0006042695,0.00040089514,0.0013770452,0.010520133,0.0053281803,0.001580973,0.005825649,0.076033436],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020045196,0.00070863805,0.00051479635,0.0021278334,0.0016229153,0.001332447,0.0011916732,0.003896725,0.016904688],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011294262,0.00000892261,0.00037998654,0.000047752204,0.0000029423952,0.00014990638,0.0003574639,0.000070643015,0.00010796096,0.062690996,0.91691554,0.019256711],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000804008,0.000004086001,0.0013021918,0.00012374319,0.000007358619,0.00008029823,0.00033142537,0.000062851475,0.00010519129,0.002686748,0.9952762,0.000012013583],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9531492,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98805654,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.076033436,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.026398402,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0699276,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25435722},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2811186273","doi":"10.7202/1045583ar","title":"RECENSION ET CRITIQUE. Aleksander STEPKOWSKI, L’Institution du trust dans le système mixte de droit privé écossais, Varsovie, Liber, 2005, p. 198","year":2007,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue du notariat","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University; Université Laval; Privy Council Office","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Institution; Philosophy; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.012268208121384619,"score_gpt":0.2654924988591995,"score_spread":0.2532242907378149,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2811186273","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0025993837,0.41654003,0.001823315,0.47800303,0.008427335,0.000035582987,0.00031163657,0.000030356547,0.09222936],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.22942136,0.49291268,0.0033293343,0.121637575,0.017615026,0.00034919937,0.00044947342,0.00024392274,0.13404144],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9931884,0.0032024418,0.00035610588,0.0007860902,0.0020979515,0.0003690179],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9931253,0.0042498996,0.0005629314,0.0003263666,0.0015509349,0.000184515],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007340502,0.001504036,0.00084838347,0.0025229896,0.00466893,0.008495114,0.002802258,0.007812417,0.008463976],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011688315,0.00062331173,0.00078210136,0.0046632634,0.018137611,0.014736505,0.0038653517,0.009869822,0.0030103205],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000044449447,0.00003963004,0.00044127647,0.0008799116,0.00001724131,0.00019984569,0.014034429,0.00017713217,0.0001432027,0.56953853,0.3941419,0.020342419],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030250385,0.0000233863,0.00190891,0.0024828166,0.000019891544,0.00025813538,0.0103076715,0.00016916584,0.0004265799,0.13047294,0.8538681,0.0000320817],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.040204413,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.043959986,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.040204413,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01823138,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013096022,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1322785},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W285780054","doi":"","title":"Presentment and Payment in Cheque Electronic Clearing: Advance Bank v. TD Bank","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Cheque; Clearing; Payment; Business; Bank account; Payment processor; Financial system; Issuing bank; Economics; Finance; Computer science; Computer security","score_opus":0.011974549669402096,"score_gpt":0.2802375553375331,"score_spread":0.268263005668131,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W285780054","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.44794306,0.0013357789,0.0050866804,0.038697816,0.00039659618,0.0003830227,0.0002984005,0.000090435475,0.50576824],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9404325,0.00060213474,0.0012345415,0.011162294,0.0001240386,0.00008448137,0.00006113968,0.000020372965,0.046278615],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98871875,0.0015319583,0.00047991317,0.0010474832,0.0034829506,0.004739029],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9942893,0.002764158,0.0005158449,0.00046850153,0.0015198063,0.00044241518],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007647857,0.00040320487,0.0004923257,0.0013562558,0.021497497,0.013483743,0.0033328938,0.015136904,0.00525953],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01498147,0.0007950629,0.0006909262,0.0021982654,0.013305971,0.0041195643,0.0044132695,0.012394064,0.0005225659],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011173303,0.00010591794,0.009763394,0.000042491174,0.000026320391,0.0047668554,0.017957682,0.0009080341,0.0007794196,0.9357038,0.020763591,0.009070768],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00045922797,0.0003537235,0.044788055,0.00068297214,0.00061132724,0.0048845187,0.06712613,0.009788272,0.009782168,0.15815437,0.7025877,0.00078149233],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.81217074,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8811313,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.81217074,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03506982,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.057788536,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3778708},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2883784538","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.3261","title":"Cross-Border Transfers of Court Proceedings","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Statute; Jurisdiction; Conflict of laws; Choice of law; Political science; Exclusive jurisdiction; Competence (human resources); Subject-matter jurisdiction; Original jurisdiction; Economics","score_opus":0.018092407634794964,"score_gpt":0.3823943637304611,"score_spread":0.3643019560956661,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2883784538","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.053853966,0.0009444174,0.026414517,0.0052893558,0.0013030112,0.0013534637,0.00097158155,0.00077008095,0.90909964],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6322628,0.0010362993,0.019576395,0.008738861,0.0009111006,0.0010116488,0.0014646302,0.0003174631,0.33468077],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98095787,0.002842785,0.0015587794,0.0030772605,0.0075175706,0.0040457486],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98497206,0.0041777273,0.00083794096,0.0046551744,0.004171338,0.0011858152],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009193307,0.00049144094,0.0005054833,0.003683365,0.0066367514,0.008554698,0.0033745286,0.004726579,0.029652052],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03573378,0.00086265913,0.0010084857,0.0031207367,0.0038009195,0.0042102886,0.008617376,0.006736102,0.0057383506],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000112722126,0.00019792012,0.0026750641,0.00012147982,0.000056403784,0.0009157225,0.003262095,0.0009710336,0.001967183,0.86954457,0.046262667,0.07391314],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020355942,0.00032864246,0.0213543,0.00066580035,0.0001432494,0.0011274097,0.003222517,0.005623386,0.0066898535,0.13465299,0.8257689,0.00021939837],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03783648,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.052427035,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03783648,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010547473,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017808026,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09919602},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2884140513","doi":"10.5539/ass.v14n8p153","title":"Family Dispute Resolution from the Perspective of Comparative Law","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Asian Social Science","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rationality; Family law; Perspective (graphical); Law; China; Dispute resolution; Civil law (Civil law); Political science; Resolution (logic); Law and economics; Sociology; Public law; Computer science","score_opus":0.04228712628705835,"score_gpt":0.362150587038631,"score_spread":0.3198634607515727,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2884140513","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.029895278,0.031930596,0.12279102,0.04711184,0.00094594184,0.00019601072,0.000115928015,0.00005356218,0.76695985],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9446114,0.007902528,0.02943766,0.0027002657,0.00068050605,0.00027282658,0.00007378716,0.000028805442,0.014292227],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98672825,0.009686842,0.0003729401,0.0009889414,0.0013396633,0.00088334293],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9931907,0.0047958107,0.00047384138,0.0005787456,0.0006852387,0.00027555836],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016289469,0.00043338563,0.00076351524,0.0041610305,0.0057965987,0.0076287007,0.0028114256,0.004138812,0.005910996],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013771914,0.0003089336,0.0008327267,0.0025382603,0.03134734,0.013124328,0.0037469226,0.005057903,0.0003001221],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000013280232,0.000002773445,0.000045815577,0.000014856066,0.0000020008576,0.000057415928,0.00064937875,0.00007830983,0.000010162164,0.9974107,0.0004002731,0.0013269421],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007021274,0.000010648866,0.0002400662,0.00013915687,0.000008032208,0.00014461733,0.0026052468,0.0007775716,0.000076591874,0.96238506,0.033596803,0.000009124829],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005349892,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004948728,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016289469,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009067621,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00508643,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08614802},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2894981321","doi":"","title":"LE CARACTÈRE « EXCEPTIONNEL » FRAPPE ENCORE ! UNE NOUVELLE VICTIME PAR RICOCHET :: LA CLAUSE D’EXCEPTION DE L’ART 3082 CCQ","year":2018,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Appeal; Context (archaeology); Political science; Common law; Confusion; Supreme court; Interpretation (philosophy); Liability; Humanities; Sociology; History; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.018844303494513777,"score_gpt":0.281617003558825,"score_spread":0.26277270006431125,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2894981321","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22170511,0.012815096,0.006537195,0.17568913,0.00264151,0.00016432529,0.0004962795,0.0002497212,0.57970166],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.78668934,0.0015722429,0.0016292521,0.021132266,0.00023337013,0.000045079913,0.000071086964,0.00008055877,0.1885468],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978896,0.0004483816,0.0000623001,0.0003274282,0.00061506656,0.00065729243],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990062,0.0003414488,0.00008976905,0.00008750676,0.00037005814,0.000105084546],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023979682,0.00031588197,0.00039129745,0.000596281,0.010983782,0.004337169,0.0013715324,0.00559325,0.0075141573],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0037312435,0.00027719987,0.0003817471,0.0005546641,0.008868291,0.0015464576,0.0018280622,0.0052959537,0.0009845237],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008218611,0.00002355035,0.0051041828,0.00015333811,0.00002423555,0.004252214,0.06664247,0.0002757029,0.0017429979,0.7410777,0.15131347,0.02930786],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015486656,0.00002307624,0.010271425,0.0002899477,0.000030305879,0.001937273,0.023607453,0.00025077787,0.0013879212,0.010509437,0.9515716,0.00010532453],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8416484,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.88619477,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1583516,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014889316,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016158413,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3185683},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2896173369","doi":"10.1080/14729342.2018.1530862","title":"Exclusive rights of patent owners versus rights of chattel owners: the implied licence approach","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Oxford University Commonwealth Law Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Victoria University","keywords":"Scope (computer science); Law; Patent law; Business; Common law; Law and economics; Exclusive right; Political science; Intellectual property; Economics","score_opus":0.049150318670832915,"score_gpt":0.2853740135228697,"score_spread":0.23622369485203676,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2896173369","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.112668045,0.003008117,0.121219054,0.0463782,0.00030798005,0.00031418804,0.00019262536,0.00008606749,0.7158257],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9623224,0.00084146304,0.006684974,0.003361608,0.00027766667,0.00034738766,0.000039538772,0.000034614735,0.02609043],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9785161,0.009325353,0.001171991,0.0029346298,0.005460441,0.002591541],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.963152,0.024169823,0.0035718721,0.005319395,0.0026919872,0.0010949286],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01779667,0.00063697324,0.0009114753,0.0033345053,0.0058362163,0.013123508,0.0033714816,0.014534228,0.011766493],"category_scores_gemma":[0.049337365,0.00073297607,0.0012586478,0.0018307798,0.046353962,0.025966238,0.008980245,0.010728653,0.001063641],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000074498544,0.000012262427,0.0003385474,0.00001583923,0.0000031292798,0.00008027004,0.00097438024,0.000089528585,0.00006723483,0.9959359,0.00032603974,0.0021494105],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004184487,0.00006322569,0.0014528013,0.0003175108,0.000038230635,0.00042933447,0.0019371654,0.001751824,0.00045811638,0.96334445,0.03011678,0.000048612794],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008426302,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0063463235,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01779667,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0057561514,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0068338253,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09411889},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2897993594","doi":"10.1017/cem.2018.433","title":"WWGD (What would Gwyneth do?)","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"letter","venue":"Canadian Journal of Emergency Medicine","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Credit Valley Hospital","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Content (measure theory); Action (physics); World Wide Web; Internet privacy; Advertising; Computer science; Business","score_opus":0.12329027816501137,"score_gpt":0.37951744345959754,"score_spread":0.25622716529458617,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2897993594","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00047390306,0.0006833139,0.00006180003,0.9718174,0.013910368,0.000031078744,0.00007158067,0.000025108493,0.012925344],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0034453666,0.00069374795,0.00015039029,0.9407704,0.0067191483,0.00008392829,0.00003288128,0.00002736192,0.04807683],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99622154,0.0006274284,0.00033599808,0.00047708937,0.0007433941,0.0015945722],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99169403,0.0014003617,0.0003856239,0.00015270269,0.0016056404,0.004761649],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003266648,0.0008120513,0.0010435838,0.000989939,0.011458238,0.00743873,0.0024261915,0.06723934,0.048919126],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017741408,0.0009385764,0.0013346703,0.00066147646,0.003825641,0.005305024,0.005854602,0.048597,0.017183425],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016895385,0.00004317635,0.00086551654,0.000039754646,0.00000786275,0.0015612876,0.0004007667,0.0000276194,0.000098644174,0.004431772,0.98606575,0.0064410055],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000060923354,0.00003189017,0.0020442938,0.0005990894,0.000015653977,0.0011433156,0.0032333895,0.00014244352,0.00010127843,0.0074966317,0.9850605,0.00007046948],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07462356,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13964151,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07462356,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0118729975,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.022740064,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16365075},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2898442080","doi":"","title":"A Comparative Analysis of Canadian and American Law Relating to the Preservation of the Confidentiality of Settlement and Mediation Discussions","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Settlement (finance); Law; Confidentiality; Mediation; Political science; Sociology; Criminology; Business","score_opus":0.03822904667678589,"score_gpt":0.3379862577107253,"score_spread":0.29975721103393943,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2898442080","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.31777117,0.014356641,0.0026809606,0.031010773,0.0005627783,0.00043990402,0.0009962079,0.00006402284,0.6321176],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97844374,0.0041528507,0.00096846384,0.0015217364,0.00007417712,0.00009046673,0.0002030604,0.0000204649,0.014524977],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9495352,0.010084177,0.00092279934,0.0011212808,0.025950117,0.012386463],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9189152,0.036976855,0.003977273,0.0019019879,0.034521434,0.003707219],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.025127254,0.00033317838,0.000610576,0.0148911355,0.033337723,0.010662949,0.0029601,0.0025040717,0.010770627],"category_scores_gemma":[0.09726657,0.00038618155,0.00065327616,0.029993102,0.013187045,0.0027472342,0.003749889,0.002917583,0.00030639058],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004542022,0.00012900493,0.0362938,0.0008365545,0.00010667951,0.0011237378,0.16216259,0.0012880369,0.0006183627,0.6426029,0.04896162,0.10542247],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007037652,0.000114142305,0.29963198,0.0017757744,0.00041071937,0.0004970875,0.2548181,0.0010383151,0.0012742453,0.024329036,0.41585204,0.00018818471],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9883571,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9948396,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18675572,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.18675572,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.26554763,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9432481},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2899773232","doi":"10.1017/s0069005800008183","title":"Canadian Cases in Private International Law in 2001-2 / Jurisprudence canadienne en matière de droit international privé en 2001-2","year":2003,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Yearbook of international Law/Annuaire canadien de droit international","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Political science; Law; Conflict of laws; Content (measure theory); Library science; Computer science; Mathematics","score_opus":0.009502899293501874,"score_gpt":0.25357983183335553,"score_spread":0.24407693253985366,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2899773232","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07464731,0.020415159,0.00066018634,0.049596757,0.001043752,0.00018208218,0.006385426,0.00015820902,0.8469112],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5185672,0.010758208,0.0012574651,0.012220923,0.00024297394,0.00013081548,0.002376509,0.00013204632,0.45431384],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99349123,0.00028006764,0.00012694104,0.00032515443,0.0034575576,0.0023190696],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99569416,0.0011352578,0.00029362887,0.00022999749,0.00181504,0.0008318069],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002816916,0.00045415678,0.00056809705,0.0038493671,0.021425221,0.009016755,0.0018767167,0.004572338,0.0130171515],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010596283,0.0007963762,0.0004962835,0.010893944,0.0049606133,0.0016119281,0.002561782,0.0045525986,0.000769719],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000058354854,0.00004393968,0.0039060344,0.00015608588,0.000018095274,0.00065656786,0.011085955,0.0006155078,0.00021753741,0.5549758,0.40763366,0.02063245],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002451319,0.000011239247,0.027685884,0.00023416932,0.000027095228,0.0001484545,0.0051167384,0.0004369163,0.00032423314,0.0059246845,0.96000135,0.00006463621],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9964813,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.998425,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7909306,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.20906934,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.17405508,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.91736746},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2900635075","doi":"","title":"Art 6:102: Implied Terms","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Compromise; Scope (computer science); Political science; Law and economics; Process (computing); Exegesis; Law; Substantive law; Business; Sociology; Computer science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.014957104384269695,"score_gpt":0.3130728842547334,"score_spread":0.2981157798704637,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2900635075","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0040785074,0.0012977648,0.021211358,0.030876055,0.0022865378,0.0003108345,0.0019453056,0.00043846772,0.9375552],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.25180858,0.0015480208,0.03493521,0.08268351,0.0046683317,0.0024199937,0.0027324515,0.0007231725,0.6184807],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9838525,0.0040586954,0.0016390956,0.0019669167,0.007171142,0.0013116905],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9908063,0.00362177,0.00045471056,0.0020096889,0.0029366415,0.0001708324],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011795382,0.0008207674,0.0009489282,0.0013347308,0.0048797037,0.008164303,0.0033591492,0.0145407915,0.031214584],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028159317,0.0008479645,0.0015157682,0.0013246748,0.008717283,0.007307401,0.0039987927,0.012904987,0.022166414],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019818328,0.000015010735,0.000101526995,0.00007351229,0.0000028832596,0.000069236055,0.0010270519,0.00008654457,0.00030255172,0.9471367,0.04639874,0.0047664545],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026048072,0.00003551874,0.0005001351,0.00045897692,0.000019667817,0.0004023206,0.000496098,0.00045196438,0.00071634084,0.23287709,0.7639633,0.00005253732],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007302173,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009699628,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.031214584,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0041572563,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0066189724,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.104423225},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2903296248","doi":"","title":"SOLICITOR-CLIENT PRIVILEGE AND THE CONFLICT OF LAWS","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Privilege (computing); Conflict of laws; Law; Supreme court; Context (archaeology); Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.04445663548282397,"score_gpt":0.31964159329450864,"score_spread":0.27518495781168467,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2903296248","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.041083228,0.13227165,0.0059598656,0.15318547,0.0016455646,0.00009425458,0.00022124419,0.000054757234,0.66548395],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8969737,0.04035696,0.0025887021,0.03061411,0.0006477584,0.000052672305,0.000093191535,0.000027731032,0.028645169],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9782219,0.004675542,0.00087735284,0.0012206234,0.010757864,0.0042466554],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98107105,0.009084363,0.0018699548,0.0006213812,0.0059534046,0.0013999172],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012097507,0.00024485672,0.00050886464,0.003708461,0.010717989,0.012249921,0.0021526918,0.004599475,0.004593288],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027710848,0.00034119567,0.00045915094,0.004032882,0.022590712,0.0037047756,0.003138757,0.0051046107,0.00028550677],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000050365106,0.0000049629543,0.0009135647,0.000095197254,0.000006883818,0.0001495749,0.0021480906,0.00008798909,0.00007638984,0.97439945,0.010589373,0.011523445],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023744115,0.00002768499,0.01526843,0.0027609086,0.00008375266,0.00050205283,0.009851588,0.00049104233,0.00039639094,0.23963258,0.73086065,0.00010121324],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8297287,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9121794,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17027128,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.054848284,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.10824836,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.397954},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2904474592","doi":"10.4324/9781315591520-8","title":"Two jurisdictions in dispute about canonical appeals","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Non canonical; Law and economics; Law; Business; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.03640043004196601,"score_gpt":0.35235740935834603,"score_spread":0.31595697931638,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2904474592","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.030398624,0.0015559418,0.011666599,0.102653205,0.0026974445,0.00025998428,0.00018947641,0.00020193776,0.8503768],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.75694066,0.0007534974,0.005121379,0.044191528,0.00317834,0.0005891296,0.00020106866,0.000289835,0.18873452],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.96626484,0.009268514,0.0014146179,0.0050726105,0.008096405,0.009882946],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97424877,0.01519436,0.0006290794,0.0022075742,0.0048780926,0.002842104],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.028339582,0.0006844358,0.001398894,0.0025717607,0.026681742,0.024787592,0.0057513234,0.026826108,0.0404465],"category_scores_gemma":[0.074484214,0.0012680201,0.0017183864,0.0025478145,0.020113004,0.01438189,0.017492438,0.032373782,0.0046838117],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031552845,0.00002235314,0.0003164221,0.000012889482,0.0000053456324,0.0006115749,0.00391592,0.00006934577,0.00008761664,0.97220135,0.019875543,0.0028501356],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012785601,0.000048893937,0.0014489628,0.00029540763,0.00004904796,0.0007155372,0.010369616,0.0016973494,0.0005093415,0.5258658,0.45870587,0.00016628116],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03332451,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04003965,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0404465,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016785089,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018378342,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14987582},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2904852339","doi":"10.3968/10687","title":"Reflection and Improvement of Litigation Relief in China's Administrative Contract Dispute Resolution","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian social science","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Vagueness; Scope (computer science); Interpretation (philosophy); Dispute resolution; Administrative law; Judicial interpretation; Law and economics; Law; Business; Ambiguity; Political science; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.021876337412117083,"score_gpt":0.3365631970575533,"score_spread":0.3146868596454362,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2904852339","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7896794,0.0041007088,0.019085174,0.031036427,0.00033293443,0.0006117595,0.000043651296,0.00014977106,0.15496011],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98977613,0.0004734375,0.0026627523,0.00063660974,0.000055462286,0.000050706836,0.000017697472,0.0000064205137,0.006320765],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9883201,0.0041980133,0.00081485015,0.00075323315,0.0038555292,0.0020582932],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961349,0.0015611373,0.0005299432,0.00022047418,0.00106947,0.0004840716],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012695341,0.00022478405,0.00038336412,0.0027224144,0.0062661096,0.006678411,0.0022398322,0.0020881165,0.0036651099],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016656604,0.0002824587,0.00055459485,0.002169797,0.0034438302,0.0039048954,0.005653828,0.0022131556,0.00018596865],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011452958,0.00039358943,0.03461403,0.0004571459,0.00004064612,0.0019003929,0.0610206,0.0039498806,0.004206096,0.56111884,0.013356262,0.31882808],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00034648716,0.00071731384,0.17394154,0.0011810518,0.0003611572,0.0016029305,0.15918678,0.07140929,0.010632516,0.25272778,0.3275409,0.00035233577],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03418437,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03436301,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03418437,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010961805,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.030358074,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.079533815},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2906321805","doi":"","title":"Force majeure clauses in comparative perspective: the Canadian common law approach in light of recent developments in the courts of Singapore and the United Kingdom","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Adelaide Research & Scholarship (AR&S) (University of Adelaide)","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Force majeure; Perspective (graphical); Law; Political science; Kingdom; Common law; Comparative law","score_opus":0.1742650682525985,"score_gpt":0.39322314210665293,"score_spread":0.21895807385405444,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2906321805","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03778762,0.025788732,0.004629374,0.059264343,0.0004411303,0.00005608396,0.00034303372,0.000020170804,0.8716695],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94409055,0.012620681,0.0037381095,0.006095567,0.00026826185,0.00005259838,0.00017641683,0.000040385425,0.03291743],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9948001,0.001507471,0.0001461405,0.00047951733,0.001685739,0.0013811272],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99356514,0.0028445325,0.0002866554,0.00020076173,0.002712331,0.00039064328],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005467426,0.00058056763,0.00077620125,0.010131665,0.016390728,0.016192013,0.003571581,0.0054891133,0.012806243],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0142338285,0.00037442995,0.00070589076,0.014556625,0.027616113,0.011304957,0.0029287222,0.0049853604,0.0003512328],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005161436,0.000002871353,0.00023702506,0.00002375094,0.0000034814618,0.000064089756,0.0029534418,0.00019443023,0.000020130361,0.9896945,0.0030892957,0.0037118208],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026656633,0.000021936185,0.011093302,0.0011171158,0.000096013915,0.00022500042,0.03793809,0.002602625,0.0002135224,0.6154527,0.3310691,0.00014384462],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9588586,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9821753,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.117516816,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.117516816,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0849199,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.85264814},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2909133158","doi":"10.7202/1055257ar","title":"Le choix de la loi applicable à la succession limité par les mesures de protection familiale en droit international privé québécois","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.005987839826960482,"score_gpt":0.25610275911139274,"score_spread":0.25011491928443225,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2909133158","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15547258,0.0017398832,0.0047225384,0.015655925,0.00032689224,0.0001272004,0.0004722081,0.00013595262,0.8213468],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6294778,0.0006712322,0.0022658443,0.0027627426,0.000056819506,0.00009091905,0.00016953355,0.000067303044,0.36443773],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99725777,0.000289551,0.000063378306,0.00031182927,0.0008198145,0.0012576838],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972953,0.00030447083,0.00015734907,0.00023140221,0.0013289053,0.00068248424],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019205513,0.00033938704,0.0002772094,0.0009621979,0.009307704,0.004988119,0.00097339123,0.0014359383,0.016234424],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004165605,0.0003346475,0.00031743493,0.00083682715,0.0049968525,0.001114598,0.0028010083,0.0031139557,0.0009279506],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008367838,0.000048284568,0.019953614,0.00010427179,0.000027591384,0.0008887309,0.024012985,0.0011237677,0.002320549,0.84273106,0.062181834,0.046523612],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029869661,0.00006689405,0.056601662,0.00041202758,0.00004434644,0.0003420988,0.0126381945,0.0009722952,0.0014726098,0.017739246,0.90957963,0.000101138],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9158181,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9668679,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.084181905,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03653621,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06619914,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26509},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2910617774","doi":"","title":"Three's Company - How American Law Can Recognize a Third Social Parent in Same-Sex Headed Families","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hastings women's law journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Sociology; Political science; Genealogy; Psychology; History","score_opus":0.04696890691286071,"score_gpt":0.28544455105574595,"score_spread":0.23847564414288525,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2910617774","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20972498,0.0040802527,0.011141245,0.22423117,0.0017788741,0.00013946646,0.00009981525,0.0001554861,0.5486488],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91697156,0.0011609044,0.003787474,0.038405914,0.00018731528,0.000111189336,0.000029191453,0.000039866285,0.03930658],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99401784,0.0019119943,0.00021395295,0.00065841345,0.001470102,0.0017276518],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9947798,0.0031372884,0.00029315174,0.00041090092,0.000617398,0.0007615128],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0076987976,0.00020714528,0.00032503586,0.0006464916,0.015479721,0.0074063325,0.0014756907,0.00792656,0.0029222963],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01655859,0.00040118702,0.0005998445,0.0006622211,0.015432876,0.0046049994,0.0048556775,0.007846826,0.00032058483],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012649015,0.000033621833,0.0032464038,0.000010859446,0.0000047445474,0.0007983974,0.01602802,0.00017085993,0.00029837774,0.9449553,0.019767072,0.014673801],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006691832,0.000097625365,0.011156171,0.0005857625,0.00009893132,0.0020105348,0.04104079,0.0022543145,0.0022581995,0.27035633,0.6698742,0.00020022543],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.31309688,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3744405,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31309688,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008873817,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.023517895,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.62254894},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2915360265","doi":"","title":"L’Enrichissement Injustifié, L’Union De Fait Et L’Emprunt À La Common Law Dans Le Droit Mixte du Québec (Unjust Enrichment, Cohabitation, and Borrowing from the Common Law in the Mixed Jurisdiction of Quebec)","year":2018,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Common law; Law; Appeal; Cohabitation; Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.007428972992978004,"score_gpt":0.2579409945712888,"score_spread":0.25051202157831076,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2915360265","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5081881,0.0031121282,0.005442213,0.016921144,0.00014514242,0.00011734278,0.00059558457,0.00006344613,0.46541482],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92565787,0.0005258967,0.00069591106,0.00062070525,0.00001564167,0.000028096883,0.000076826705,0.00001638592,0.072362624],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986873,0.0003052097,0.00003403596,0.00016663042,0.0003400155,0.00046676781],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988574,0.00023707194,0.00012489644,0.00010128525,0.0005032842,0.0001760627],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001131107,0.00030154438,0.00020431688,0.0010151312,0.009527821,0.005145454,0.0008440543,0.0013847749,0.013113265],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023596238,0.00020393968,0.00025603402,0.0013779865,0.009251792,0.0017336863,0.0020245027,0.0014139479,0.00042322886],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000081805614,0.000045380348,0.030660372,0.00013480484,0.000042401156,0.00094737083,0.08119922,0.0013048885,0.0014243791,0.82115555,0.02061923,0.042384584],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000039041875,0.000091311755,0.21633404,0.00070165895,0.00011119747,0.0004766596,0.12513997,0.0037443833,0.0024795192,0.06045927,0.59020907,0.00021380998],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9750259,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9851142,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0593715,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0593715,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03538476,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.43077242},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2920080742","doi":"","title":"Of Irregular Votes and Robocalls: Resolving Disputed Elections in Canada and New Zealand","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Lawmaking; Political science; Democracy; Constitutionalism; Order (exchange); Law and economics; Jurisdiction; Law; Politics; Sociology; Economics; Legislature","score_opus":0.0099578981029491,"score_gpt":0.2462043766314103,"score_spread":0.2362464785284612,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2920080742","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.74064577,0.0042573214,0.003738452,0.03999632,0.0005312426,0.00052452844,0.0004846727,0.00007631126,0.20974547],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9618397,0.0012993517,0.0021802776,0.002056218,0.00005556018,0.00006234801,0.00017482163,0.000047703772,0.032284018],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9906218,0.0015161034,0.00035813497,0.0008725301,0.002765263,0.0038661966],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9929134,0.0027948385,0.00067410845,0.0004004628,0.0019372718,0.0012799401],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00915885,0.00029404432,0.00068773027,0.0022826174,0.018867198,0.01070412,0.0028802839,0.0033563313,0.007016594],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03360375,0.0005460175,0.00054117246,0.0036707665,0.007718727,0.0028230692,0.005601427,0.0043120566,0.00049827434],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00067569775,0.00027209296,0.09020442,0.0006670869,0.0001998121,0.009365495,0.23610553,0.0087697,0.0027386385,0.35864747,0.085956395,0.20639761],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00027929316,0.00011914111,0.116256945,0.0005874507,0.00020109137,0.00065411883,0.34215406,0.00808932,0.0018473071,0.026951974,0.5024707,0.00038858905],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99317497,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9976006,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09032728,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09032728,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12184535,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.65537333},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2921280898","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v35i0.5692","title":"George M. Duck Lecture","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Windsor Yearbook of Access to Justice","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"George (robot); Windsor; Art; Humanities; Library science; Art history; Biology; Computer science; Ecology","score_opus":0.04109636855055323,"score_gpt":0.3630343156885368,"score_spread":0.32193794713798357,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2921280898","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0011566542,0.046713296,0.00070991373,0.12231718,0.07284584,0.000055714958,0.0010726172,0.00029159998,0.75483716],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0057646437,0.01148055,0.0002872954,0.006232682,0.0044450588,0.000013809696,0.00020792415,0.00008408598,0.971484],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983902,0.00015442411,0.0000495932,0.00027922407,0.0008042762,0.0003222741],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964044,0.00019258521,0.00006633357,0.00013703838,0.0014423168,0.0017573697],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013744503,0.00082294963,0.0005322509,0.0013430441,0.004774778,0.0037770565,0.00076827063,0.002419812,0.19137754],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0040108534,0.0004658161,0.0004152932,0.0007373369,0.0012163613,0.0019651814,0.0020823255,0.0033966945,0.08736842],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000067315787,0.000006861585,0.00007308806,0.0000151543445,7.567012e-7,0.000035619625,0.00004662088,0.000014833297,0.00004410067,0.002601754,0.982495,0.01465957],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000010779027,0.0000041540707,0.00024213409,0.000034457793,7.6065413e-7,0.00005246835,0.0000559135,0.000009289812,0.0000218836,0.00034725745,0.99922836,0.0000022859147],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.100133486,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2972647,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19137754,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01047208,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0108977165,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6402216},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2922088468","doi":"","title":"EQUUSTEK V GOOGLE: LA RHÉTORIQUE DE LA VIRTUALITÉ EN DROIT INTERNATIONAL PRIVÉ","year":2016,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cyberspace; Rhetoric; Internationalism (politics); Political science; Virtuality (gaming); Sociology; Law; Globalization; Law and economics; Politics; The Internet","score_opus":0.008815120384069716,"score_gpt":0.31168137675624,"score_spread":0.3028662563721703,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2922088468","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08723912,0.0068679666,0.0065660705,0.074709356,0.0008672948,0.000044389628,0.00013863118,0.00013720019,0.8234301],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9366762,0.0017947111,0.0010412773,0.011141957,0.00022405238,0.000028560684,0.00004297254,0.00007887061,0.048971415],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99484164,0.0011127334,0.00008554373,0.00043836233,0.0024149208,0.0011068677],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966916,0.002204974,0.00020269271,0.00016061554,0.0005738112,0.00016630648],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027095259,0.00036349322,0.0002910333,0.001915445,0.013828841,0.011942319,0.001531517,0.006966566,0.004521842],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01013617,0.00033893177,0.00033515485,0.002228922,0.023623819,0.0077352454,0.004716502,0.0058480753,0.00037405425],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010792224,0.0000029608843,0.00025555768,0.000022636847,0.0000024373344,0.00020407562,0.009132108,0.000106104104,0.00009707788,0.9750768,0.011583856,0.0035056958],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000033027114,0.000028083152,0.002420751,0.0005735368,0.000043866123,0.0005770403,0.032623295,0.0014427439,0.0014618319,0.16211718,0.7985467,0.00013196238],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5948641,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.59700763,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5948641,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02600262,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018431809,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8150437},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2922195051","doi":"10.7202/1056952ar","title":"L’harmonisation internationale du droit privé","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.016963281105763568,"score_gpt":0.24994851711951757,"score_spread":0.232985236013754,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2922195051","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013134527,0.005536195,0.026314456,0.014712721,0.0010090572,0.000084504565,0.0006886017,0.00037439162,0.93814546],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4486791,0.010963094,0.021094987,0.0092116445,0.001241261,0.00043796952,0.0022900326,0.0014478207,0.5046341],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9877357,0.0029031064,0.00051985093,0.002196049,0.0052532484,0.0013920625],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99471813,0.0009145363,0.00052761077,0.0015289114,0.0019553953,0.00035545998],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0052846917,0.0006958721,0.0006196514,0.0026678653,0.0030910037,0.012468287,0.0014997149,0.0027202622,0.043166444],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009496849,0.00053052924,0.0009160235,0.004291424,0.005495208,0.00969922,0.006498941,0.0060165883,0.0077195056],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029358565,0.000025885973,0.0008115504,0.00013393072,0.000026975284,0.00008435313,0.0020337773,0.0010065077,0.00065433333,0.93226105,0.021185668,0.04174659],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011214426,0.000031210984,0.0025118932,0.00024452325,0.000011108897,0.00014687992,0.0011048664,0.00044412987,0.0006571935,0.045834303,0.9489778,0.000024776416],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.028624581,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015114515,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.043166444,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010277397,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012619642,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14440608},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2943331549","doi":"","title":"The Utility of Citizenship Stripping Laws in the Uk, Canada and Australia","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Melbourne University law review","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Citizenship; Law; Stripping (fiber); Political science; Project commissioning; Publishing; Engineering; Politics","score_opus":0.06806905477514832,"score_gpt":0.3142376083634411,"score_spread":0.2461685535882928,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2943331549","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09168504,0.62067795,0.0005055707,0.13371538,0.002356042,0.00014637076,0.0014106792,0.000024389916,0.1494786],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7147727,0.23821966,0.00051004527,0.031102465,0.0011436454,0.000088306915,0.00042336277,0.000041902742,0.013697862],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.97358036,0.005384749,0.0016173469,0.0013914892,0.012245204,0.005780894],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.88309634,0.05478787,0.0066125747,0.0019233956,0.049133874,0.004445936],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.024120469,0.0003954915,0.0016313493,0.013400508,0.006284239,0.01276251,0.0035798908,0.0062862877,0.0035501467],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11869921,0.00069257896,0.0011071417,0.017448459,0.00990726,0.0038705196,0.0028401928,0.0064596934,0.00020844399],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00043014676,0.00013510202,0.032285202,0.007513489,0.0011072112,0.0010859714,0.012633528,0.003368367,0.00023936378,0.5724838,0.17240272,0.19631504],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00018721477,0.00019902717,0.21540669,0.024736475,0.0028572422,0.00047496677,0.017245447,0.0019703873,0.00058789336,0.043756783,0.69224054,0.0003373519],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95551896,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97524107,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08420292,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08420292,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.16853832,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.61093783},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2943774203","doi":"10.1017/s0020782900006914","title":"SupremeCourt of Canada: Mugesera v.Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration)","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Legal Materials","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Citizenship; Immigration; Political science; Law; Content (measure theory); Politics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.009112330724101208,"score_gpt":0.25057192659917027,"score_spread":0.24145959587506907,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2943774203","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04755713,0.007658196,0.00063122966,0.18805908,0.0031466319,0.00015654291,0.0036785314,0.00018282863,0.74892974],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.37638497,0.003820469,0.00086692185,0.10976193,0.00040350592,0.00007387274,0.0009013422,0.00012651118,0.50766045],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971872,0.00014851356,0.00005285676,0.00019128899,0.0010664696,0.0013537095],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99762017,0.00027994317,0.000054470227,0.00006044959,0.001354387,0.00063046714],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016216347,0.0003735979,0.0004377799,0.0008838178,0.020778142,0.0055087805,0.0019325458,0.007351855,0.016317334],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006369063,0.00044867134,0.0004941344,0.0013249702,0.0020492647,0.0013251252,0.0015558677,0.0068770163,0.0011468453],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000055266733,0.000025466508,0.005048721,0.00007397764,0.000020872081,0.000779322,0.0028385436,0.00016644367,0.00031324386,0.10851172,0.8684487,0.013717814],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004263566,0.00002353954,0.019595455,0.00033974077,0.000080419006,0.00023012885,0.005033029,0.000384151,0.0007373146,0.0071007954,0.96634346,0.00008922745],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9914978,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99755174,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.053527392,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.053527392,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14272279,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38837022},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2945387792","doi":"","title":"7.4 Families and Property Rights in Canada","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Property (philosophy); Property rights; Law and economics; Political science; Business; Law; Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.010894122088965686,"score_gpt":0.23015198633982117,"score_spread":0.2192578642508555,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2945387792","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.29775873,0.0069720102,0.0009416065,0.045586288,0.00035819007,0.00007169426,0.0015236433,0.000047513535,0.6467403],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91153985,0.0020579344,0.000488772,0.0031797478,0.00005381188,0.00001896925,0.00017646154,0.00002132949,0.08246302],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968868,0.0002425797,0.000050375085,0.00013249886,0.0006622276,0.0020254862],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99696594,0.0003514276,0.00013029462,0.000069878755,0.0013778539,0.0011046602],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010515403,0.00016065945,0.00029923237,0.0015782869,0.015266984,0.0059185857,0.0010245919,0.0019551895,0.024413945],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0036366275,0.00017721123,0.0005028764,0.00201537,0.00416379,0.0014239583,0.0017311012,0.002119235,0.00055549055],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007876368,0.00007707109,0.05522419,0.00014184225,0.00004693753,0.0010484053,0.016793603,0.0011805515,0.0004481,0.8159529,0.06805786,0.040949777],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008798292,0.00005772499,0.17482722,0.0009804118,0.00012792529,0.00050073746,0.07096116,0.002186854,0.0010663156,0.060060937,0.688969,0.00017366341],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9958572,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9982798,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07716497,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07716497,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14740916,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5598737},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2946065467","doi":"10.15168/11572_368650","title":"Marital status discrimination in the allocation of rights, obligations, and benefits: Legal paths to protect non-normative families","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"Institutional Research Information System (Università degli Studi di Trento)","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Normative; Argument (complex analysis); Political science; European union; Convention; Human rights; Family law; Law; Law and economics; Sociology; Business; International trade","score_opus":0.04203468787288808,"score_gpt":0.3361627486649549,"score_spread":0.29412806079206677,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2946065467","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13718921,0.048768286,0.03747781,0.216383,0.0010213323,0.00019296595,0.000118427524,0.000059160167,0.5587899],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96214795,0.009486906,0.0075189555,0.008990019,0.00035812004,0.00012718022,0.000029013492,0.000024100329,0.011317805],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98749477,0.006758364,0.0004103463,0.0008704181,0.0029421165,0.001523899],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99012125,0.005772484,0.00083809515,0.0010543397,0.001689905,0.00052397436],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022314953,0.00034618247,0.0005075993,0.0017885887,0.007291155,0.008188123,0.0023608664,0.005570004,0.003051519],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023212181,0.0003286535,0.00042011624,0.0016036105,0.037020862,0.011245202,0.005922596,0.006092117,0.0002732844],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005481786,0.000008400744,0.00029245616,0.00002229746,0.0000020809389,0.000022997361,0.003972106,0.0000813651,0.000033135624,0.9898371,0.0005349102,0.0051877694],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003470381,0.000053810734,0.0037890146,0.001126865,0.000037168465,0.00013919902,0.012667408,0.00068239414,0.00067147706,0.82276475,0.1579829,0.000050237355],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08102122,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.11593567,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08102122,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017858285,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.028294358,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16109926},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2946429698","doi":"","title":"LE DROIT CANADIEN DES BREVETS EN CAPSULE – PARTIE II","year":2009,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Patentability; Scope (computer science); Political science; Patent law; Law; Normative; State (computer science); Law and economics; Sociology; Intellectual property; Computer science","score_opus":0.022762561645108533,"score_gpt":0.2748898762452553,"score_spread":0.25212731460014676,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2946429698","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0026960475,0.262907,0.0020609526,0.032278255,0.016853055,0.00009318486,0.0015105151,0.0002696468,0.6813314],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.040120482,0.11115476,0.0021774173,0.010245976,0.0037196458,0.00008574842,0.001171976,0.00034849936,0.83097553],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99788314,0.0001773635,0.00005496399,0.00023482264,0.0013632453,0.00028644723],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99873084,0.0002566456,0.000051963998,0.00007503918,0.0007803462,0.00010526448],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014709682,0.0005944451,0.0005520086,0.003918263,0.0051705707,0.0057831826,0.0012912897,0.0018622909,0.04604176],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004428635,0.00029598616,0.0005121561,0.0051015825,0.0031397003,0.0019049486,0.00138681,0.0029763668,0.00720699],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000032062733,0.00001179179,0.00027550172,0.00049126445,0.0000136213475,0.00011745388,0.0015937763,0.00019245587,0.0003095845,0.20390369,0.69417727,0.09888157],"study_design_scores_gemma":[9.666743e-7,0.000001831019,0.000313609,0.00009134457,0.0000020519565,0.000021077121,0.00009932565,0.0000113877795,0.000046622572,0.0009267714,0.99848026,0.0000048072334],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.81952107,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.84832615,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18047893,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.022318086,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.026888164,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3630836},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2946962158","doi":"","title":"RE-ARRANGING THE ARRANGEMENT LANDSCAPE: THE IMPLICATIONS OF RE MAGNA INTERNATIONAL INC","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Test (biology); Law; Variety (cybernetics); Balancing test; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology; Computer science; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.07158653283137478,"score_gpt":0.31340565440114715,"score_spread":0.24181912156977237,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2946962158","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.043216716,0.0069233086,0.0021948274,0.39592278,0.001160015,0.00015036475,0.0003197821,0.00013453694,0.54997766],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7500411,0.00351685,0.0039374703,0.09741761,0.00060409884,0.00014229964,0.00017096456,0.000096242446,0.14407328],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.978079,0.003088912,0.0004504514,0.001782089,0.009101169,0.007498483],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98696923,0.0036943369,0.0006508159,0.00090750377,0.005744041,0.002033917],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009607279,0.0004376904,0.0005418734,0.0015699952,0.018245678,0.014230469,0.0040493542,0.013021183,0.007052223],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02834611,0.00055973174,0.0007178694,0.0014401732,0.016134014,0.0044546053,0.0037094567,0.009481306,0.00077278004],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024695955,0.000019050189,0.0013435348,0.000042488213,0.000011778,0.00038586385,0.002643872,0.00054483255,0.00023437843,0.91766775,0.06489336,0.012188535],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000829702,0.00007736742,0.014191657,0.00046065834,0.0000872127,0.00034563895,0.013162003,0.0024468028,0.0011357571,0.11797229,0.84974253,0.00029515836],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9527724,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97654426,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9527724,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0871233,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12849411,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6321267},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2947277614","doi":"10.7202/1059392ar","title":"LA LOI 89 ET LE DROIT INTERNATIONAL PRIVÉ","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.012543122355005414,"score_gpt":0.269172592454876,"score_spread":0.2566294700998706,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2947277614","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.073950686,0.0075934315,0.0022576526,0.033233568,0.0013401329,0.00015212793,0.0008466658,0.00012113207,0.88050455],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.39505962,0.0037405032,0.0021193363,0.016113386,0.000667411,0.0004003,0.00074344745,0.00019243079,0.5809636],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99522406,0.00072134077,0.00020388172,0.0006664857,0.001305573,0.0018788223],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99761707,0.00072322425,0.0005359058,0.0002471898,0.00048357097,0.00039305384],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029702347,0.0004435678,0.00040900154,0.0017540625,0.004944102,0.009231482,0.0012656244,0.0038279241,0.026515504],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006541694,0.00049870746,0.00072105206,0.00237037,0.0046581887,0.003291254,0.0050098374,0.008403563,0.0027483827],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010167834,0.00004823647,0.006610833,0.00015357583,0.000025141175,0.0002836689,0.009454602,0.00037388736,0.00063977303,0.914516,0.03772295,0.030069796],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027148044,0.00006509962,0.015329761,0.00026911907,0.000018090102,0.00012911366,0.0034112902,0.00012360784,0.00048072208,0.008185625,0.9719096,0.00005076345],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.18438096,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.21482556,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18438096,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017366093,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016939918,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36661547},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2947697804","doi":"10.7202/1059343ar","title":"HOW HYBRID IS SAINT LUCIAN LAW?","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; SAINT; Code (set theory); English law; Civil law (Civil law); History; Sociology; Political science; Art history; Computer science; Commercial law; Programming language","score_opus":0.01268402080624465,"score_gpt":0.2459202118506119,"score_spread":0.23323619104436724,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2947697804","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09218978,0.003404571,0.002444796,0.113100365,0.00039172184,0.000015421421,0.0002096912,0.0000755765,0.78816813],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9411904,0.0012897763,0.0007865255,0.009089685,0.0002620943,0.000020981935,0.00011273858,0.00004272272,0.047205083],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99640036,0.0012729327,0.000074953736,0.00040034534,0.00070901355,0.001142367],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985442,0.00044091392,0.0001586118,0.00021762002,0.0003712756,0.00026745212],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028672772,0.00020220848,0.00030684454,0.0018599887,0.0046529872,0.011565141,0.0008414128,0.0020095597,0.0063434467],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00454938,0.00022394548,0.00033182232,0.0016982089,0.027293088,0.0042587747,0.0026108166,0.0024646793,0.0011359158],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009191762,0.000004594739,0.0017148987,0.0000124525695,0.0000070978726,0.0000989323,0.0034276752,0.00005893208,0.000040683673,0.98132,0.0073627424,0.005942784],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001616805,0.000033125114,0.015916092,0.0002635124,0.000017989983,0.00038436142,0.012397063,0.0005662226,0.00026452736,0.5548324,0.415258,0.000050459603],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12569799,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15928322,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12569799,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01933974,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0071981004,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24993265},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2947788385","doi":"","title":"L'EFFICACITE EN DROIT QUEBECOIS D'UNE CONVENTION D'ARBITRAGE OU D'ELECTION DE FOR INVOQUEE A L'ENCONTRE D'UN APPEL EN GARANTIE","year":2004,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law; Arbitration; Convention; Appeal; Supreme court; Jurisdiction; Jurisprudence","score_opus":0.015452921952930805,"score_gpt":0.28063631076907675,"score_spread":0.26518338881614595,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2947788385","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.024179999,0.01568683,0.0075583383,0.07423179,0.0017679996,0.00014036101,0.00038720487,0.00017399709,0.87587345],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.41069525,0.0046360902,0.005257436,0.016822435,0.00037232248,0.00010077405,0.00011349755,0.0000948929,0.5619073],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9898009,0.0018578996,0.000347543,0.0009963567,0.0049501103,0.0020472729],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99308634,0.0022910507,0.00039338908,0.00045534424,0.003250334,0.0005235575],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005716899,0.00056517014,0.0005705424,0.0016258461,0.0109568685,0.010391496,0.0017683053,0.0058587776,0.013230701],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011675395,0.0005207919,0.00075788854,0.0016077827,0.0061718724,0.0023168295,0.0020182924,0.0053130067,0.0016084105],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031397933,0.000022646418,0.0017927423,0.00014087153,0.000030751962,0.00030975248,0.002863987,0.00026690227,0.00061460567,0.89793795,0.065956,0.030032301],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026092785,0.0000331443,0.0063770474,0.00024799813,0.00003885723,0.00018245421,0.0011650623,0.0005796249,0.000977282,0.024009198,0.96628946,0.00007378723],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.92709553,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.95957285,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07290447,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.037054177,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.056990907,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26884818},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2947980340","doi":"10.7202/1059144ar","title":"Le droit international privé du divorce et de la filiation adoptive : un renversement de la méthodologie conflictuelle","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue générale de droit","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.017089917024183315,"score_gpt":0.29351922453878676,"score_spread":0.27642930751460343,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2947980340","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.15187506,0.017053777,0.42257488,0.07264051,0.0021979888,0.0020371836,0.001792654,0.00016782843,0.32966027],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.82746285,0.0048667965,0.124325596,0.004885796,0.0005355195,0.005252991,0.00041231845,0.0002844445,0.03197373],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9377417,0.051866375,0.0015011686,0.002886352,0.0046828203,0.0013216037],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8955804,0.08748703,0.0048878654,0.005865682,0.0053695347,0.0008095011],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04869986,0.0011469809,0.0015447219,0.00840656,0.007048827,0.015952952,0.0042735655,0.0028780908,0.017116409],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07169446,0.00073033624,0.0014917857,0.008240255,0.03054788,0.01815031,0.008293037,0.0074374704,0.0007591065],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042993892,0.000042968433,0.0044263415,0.00021237503,0.000044197142,0.000057720903,0.044653654,0.00025684835,0.000057634268,0.93098617,0.0018349343,0.017384175],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000758641,0.0000893716,0.00909862,0.0018209078,0.0001233054,0.00024679373,0.101070344,0.0035050798,0.00090203434,0.7550064,0.1279165,0.00014479201],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023229256,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022015797,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04869986,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012879227,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008660779,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2575525},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2949196423","doi":"10.11575/prism/32682","title":"An Evaluation of the Clicklaw Wikibook JP Boyd on Family Law: Final Report","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Open MIND","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Law Foundation of British Columbia","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.18161608580275274,"score_gpt":0.43475547581112456,"score_spread":0.2531393900083718,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2949196423","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3870295,0.009558417,0.011078566,0.021341728,0.006915904,0.039927058,0.058401667,0.009294038,0.45645303],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5308336,0.008664797,0.06813021,0.018033955,0.0017972754,0.041106906,0.12926076,0.0056913774,0.19648115],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.90722847,0.032300934,0.0042684344,0.0029778902,0.050065894,0.003158309],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.75681347,0.07026885,0.0078512775,0.013160214,0.12335247,0.028553808],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06947946,0.0010088149,0.0012564702,0.0071552373,0.0035420205,0.008729764,0.0036422384,0.0025747507,0.014293223],"category_scores_gemma":[0.18934672,0.00079757004,0.0011144823,0.0055153617,0.0026784563,0.008383338,0.00718061,0.003614318,0.006855442],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.004958066,0.0099083325,0.015351615,0.004861274,0.000387442,0.0004191129,0.009065539,0.0010955366,0.0021090538,0.0064813425,0.54599416,0.3993686],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004144594,0.009040113,0.076556586,0.0035426444,0.00047331644,0.00022684409,0.009851497,0.0023415384,0.0062393225,0.0020266287,0.8851935,0.00036333306],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0642707,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.111266196,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06947946,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01259719,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01935512,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3674469},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2951920380","doi":"","title":"BOOK REVIEW: INTERNATIONAL LAW CHIEFLY AS INTERPRETED AND APPLIED IN CANADA, 8TH EDITION","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.016260050953258963,"score_gpt":0.2758640490587191,"score_spread":0.25960399810546014,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2951920380","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00019695668,0.81292003,0.00037637673,0.053704344,0.04611361,0.00013401671,0.0026123931,0.00020534701,0.0837369],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.004309056,0.65459716,0.00080851023,0.030344462,0.019534282,0.00023507794,0.0023633237,0.00020926238,0.28759885],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9958864,0.00022161427,0.00017101,0.00019618028,0.0031148258,0.00040999523],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.985285,0.0016417577,0.0004911359,0.00020116415,0.0117067695,0.0006742916],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002979728,0.0018325556,0.0025098359,0.015173834,0.0043570935,0.0092169745,0.0037953425,0.005240487,0.040103056],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013562047,0.0011033714,0.0008612669,0.028670084,0.0035128468,0.0029658224,0.0014651979,0.004298914,0.01325118],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000020014181,0.0000023397452,0.000023972658,0.00017738788,0.0000023630735,0.0000060976704,0.000019105215,0.0000309626,0.00000735302,0.00088076474,0.9899741,0.00887357],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000028950574,0.0000023198347,0.0003724147,0.000726786,0.000008449055,0.000020131762,0.000054908287,0.000018763272,0.000010445546,0.0007035597,0.9980704,0.000008973556],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8923923,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96422833,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10760772,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.056740537,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.15678374,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41168332},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2954472095","doi":"","title":"CANADA V CRAIG - THE COMMON LAW AS THE SERVANT OF SOCIETY","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.022211428900739433,"score_gpt":0.2741144784323228,"score_spread":0.2519030495315834,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2954472095","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018406335,0.029014902,0.0017295134,0.37340203,0.0048690927,0.00014873287,0.0012564061,0.00013490682,0.5710382],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.44229287,0.016090201,0.0025981271,0.25958583,0.0016971356,0.00014913552,0.00050427933,0.0002079143,0.27687457],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98731947,0.0012237552,0.00037036004,0.00085771806,0.00624601,0.003982691],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9850344,0.0042537088,0.0006079379,0.0004494845,0.007670631,0.001983821],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0061015654,0.00055997266,0.0006866634,0.0035259272,0.025387062,0.012112197,0.0032093632,0.014812667,0.0128830355],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027060525,0.0007587742,0.000895468,0.0050102603,0.009794331,0.003924885,0.0027789727,0.011657203,0.0010982465],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030454634,0.000011800848,0.0013334267,0.00012997429,0.000022115728,0.0001692774,0.0017918525,0.00016778956,0.00014186869,0.47719052,0.5065558,0.012455151],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000287466,0.000014915886,0.006594341,0.0006047116,0.000094894865,0.00012679845,0.0039196042,0.00023478913,0.0003637612,0.03436525,0.95353913,0.000113023976],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98719496,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99492407,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07534687,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07534687,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.30179286,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.54668236},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2955714486","doi":"10.3138/9781487530167-007","title":"5. The Reference Jurisdiction of the Supreme Court of Canada","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of Toronto Press eBooks","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Jurisdiction; Law; Political science; Original jurisdiction","score_opus":0.021246436787885407,"score_gpt":0.217124683386625,"score_spread":0.1958782465987396,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2955714486","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0025433407,0.01648648,0.00060069363,0.021258181,0.0007900096,0.00003692293,0.00064181164,0.000034928868,0.9576077],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.15020666,0.0080133295,0.0010557655,0.0135203535,0.000375358,0.00007406806,0.0003080668,0.000106090934,0.82634044],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978809,0.00025391293,0.000049428647,0.00021629196,0.0006890411,0.0009103488],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99867994,0.0003273321,0.00004392848,0.00005937212,0.000743839,0.00014557739],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001070852,0.00059290376,0.00047115373,0.0019561064,0.018501779,0.009989118,0.0016225043,0.008807778,0.030121533],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0038101715,0.0006912858,0.00044393496,0.0034093217,0.006085278,0.0028858904,0.0013592287,0.005754487,0.0030072795],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006411616,0.0000052572796,0.00013721564,0.00002976288,0.0000023251805,0.000059643466,0.0020990388,0.00008668793,0.000034297464,0.83730876,0.15492398,0.005306526],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000089896475,0.000004462016,0.0014821126,0.0002549363,0.0000142768995,0.000040921543,0.0016663603,0.00017893988,0.00012671012,0.054110344,0.94208515,0.000026775468],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98128456,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99385506,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9238505,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07614952,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09152164,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5525061},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2956195834","doi":"","title":"CASE COMMENTS - COMMENTAIRES D'ARRET - SAUVE V. CANADA: THE RIGHT THING TO DO FOR WRONGDOERS?","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.03651461795572938,"score_gpt":0.3192425386169643,"score_spread":0.2827279206612349,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2956195834","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012411857,0.0018010318,0.0007542854,0.90256315,0.0059254332,0.0001400276,0.00038947965,0.000071383896,0.07594336],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.10175389,0.0021875151,0.00079569255,0.7742432,0.0021881266,0.00010187156,0.00010032376,0.00010284969,0.11852657],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9898969,0.0011889602,0.00037697054,0.00097961,0.003484629,0.0040728855],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99040157,0.0036883058,0.0005351369,0.00020683355,0.003748275,0.0014198315],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0056032175,0.0007228777,0.00084836525,0.0014777755,0.028543178,0.0067823566,0.003810861,0.03436046,0.010976057],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023681007,0.00077780423,0.001282491,0.002011613,0.00704423,0.002920806,0.0024839337,0.031334084,0.0012293262],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000080543825,0.000037873455,0.00276624,0.00015286749,0.000033018037,0.0038541874,0.013914224,0.00020979308,0.0006217244,0.09937735,0.87208426,0.0068678674],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000043882275,0.000028050046,0.0048609055,0.00039395606,0.00010732754,0.001443388,0.025222031,0.00030589473,0.00068322103,0.009288036,0.9574458,0.0001774421],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.93329245,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97184956,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06670755,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04599573,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07202115,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3337239},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2963240845","doi":"","title":"LE LIVRE X DU CODE CIVIL DU QUEBEC : BILAN ET ENJEUX","year":2010,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Jurisprudence; Political science; Civil code; Conflict of laws; Jurisdiction","score_opus":0.031406309937161064,"score_gpt":0.29141230250977135,"score_spread":0.26000599257261026,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2963240845","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08837342,0.25192466,0.004116628,0.16017538,0.004041606,0.00010628936,0.0016326357,0.00015827466,0.48947117],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7013333,0.045042254,0.0028994933,0.016278261,0.00086730166,0.000080618775,0.0004423626,0.00010048903,0.23295595],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964653,0.00069258094,0.00006834368,0.00031638314,0.0017870578,0.00067033456],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966192,0.00081614684,0.00022122602,0.000114065864,0.0019299403,0.00029948613],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00215054,0.00039536276,0.00040610417,0.0029816693,0.009504966,0.0069384375,0.001031875,0.00252816,0.011516115],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0061154757,0.00030225934,0.00039955176,0.0044537424,0.0062191933,0.0018210298,0.00085138134,0.0031279484,0.00064393075],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000058586316,0.00003274956,0.0076390384,0.00036559036,0.00004699908,0.0005359277,0.010619442,0.00070674554,0.0005867385,0.645174,0.2324533,0.10178089],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013132562,0.000021623808,0.036895502,0.00057323684,0.000027750828,0.00015869753,0.004989184,0.00049699843,0.00026664574,0.010661879,0.9458333,0.000062032566],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99269897,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9947962,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.083562694,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.083562694,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.086477876,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6062926},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2963942600","doi":"10.7202/1065029ar","title":"La gestation pour autrui : l’influence des droits fondamentaux européens sur le droit international privé","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue québécoise de droit international","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy; Political science","score_opus":0.015212320402516182,"score_gpt":0.2700815275447722,"score_spread":0.254869207142256,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2963942600","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.50083476,0.014418318,0.0041139666,0.07170467,0.0007001541,0.000036716912,0.0002362825,0.000050646297,0.4079045],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96494794,0.003589518,0.0009138338,0.0032371152,0.00013077524,0.000029802908,0.000057396446,0.00004828732,0.02704537],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99608934,0.0021435518,0.00011187781,0.0004126171,0.00043333095,0.0008093179],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9937645,0.0034098923,0.0009930183,0.00034444785,0.00058905093,0.00089913694],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0044262847,0.00021916624,0.00028573986,0.00085089885,0.004398789,0.007232945,0.00067822373,0.0018230467,0.010632011],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008626682,0.00021108161,0.00043390814,0.0012627436,0.0072892806,0.0031716453,0.004006077,0.0028711436,0.000698087],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00019596325,0.00005815235,0.030529775,0.00012567149,0.000043001743,0.0012763501,0.097590275,0.0004331519,0.0005088055,0.815749,0.007878153,0.04561167],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000071640956,0.00023299587,0.12680855,0.0021541947,0.00009081832,0.0014569964,0.16252778,0.00062239385,0.001309814,0.0927019,0.61188775,0.0001351033],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.050037686,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0431784,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.050037686,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005928964,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0073376005,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09949285},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2967660575","doi":"","title":"LA REFONTE DU CODE CIVIL ROUMAIN ET LE CODE CIVIL DU QUEBEC","year":2010,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Civil code; Decree; Legislation; Law; Code (set theory); Statute; Political science; Romanian; Civil procedure; Politics; Civil law (Civil law); Commercial law; Computer science","score_opus":0.02155987300214066,"score_gpt":0.28327152944110456,"score_spread":0.2617116564389639,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2967660575","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04012593,0.062364254,0.0059466297,0.088281,0.0063464325,0.00022442153,0.0024743397,0.00032189325,0.79391503],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.35976678,0.014231099,0.0046833684,0.015748147,0.00080811145,0.00017133002,0.0007312105,0.00015235908,0.60370755],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9941486,0.0010309828,0.0001395672,0.0005829821,0.0029953136,0.0011025402],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99346113,0.0013623044,0.00036078045,0.00028740164,0.0040725176,0.00045584506],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002926448,0.00047533927,0.00044514332,0.0019316302,0.008388716,0.005003611,0.0012913832,0.0031115082,0.015793853],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008910659,0.00033755213,0.00050200714,0.0024383455,0.0038318755,0.00169252,0.000852096,0.0043100156,0.0012938337],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000066898414,0.000029562982,0.003662158,0.00018306922,0.000029506988,0.00026326068,0.0025397346,0.00039283227,0.000550703,0.72081447,0.2075202,0.063947655],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012194929,0.000012250181,0.0072850203,0.0001501275,0.000008909017,0.000070504604,0.0005144596,0.00020393501,0.0002159425,0.002248595,0.9892456,0.000032307293],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97792417,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9763367,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.059913877,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.059913877,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.10746151,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.43470764},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2979039387","doi":"","title":"Japan's Dismissal Restriction System in Comparison with Germany and South Korea","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian parliamentary review","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dismissal; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.025182728982518856,"score_gpt":0.28092764596142705,"score_spread":0.2557449169789082,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2979039387","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6433587,0.20527108,0.0005192396,0.018337857,0.0009110775,0.00022479826,0.004279835,0.00004485126,0.12705258],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94118595,0.042845093,0.00072839117,0.004611842,0.00021950172,0.00012792791,0.0021148091,0.000031981064,0.008134498],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99186,0.001493944,0.0012079725,0.0006653357,0.0027804177,0.0019924429],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9728166,0.00521861,0.0040747826,0.0007281116,0.015689004,0.0014729181],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013532206,0.00024103759,0.00085043564,0.0106846,0.0037237494,0.0047505014,0.0012856673,0.0010545172,0.0018804327],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02194457,0.00047709607,0.0007313734,0.015119121,0.0015352695,0.0014236756,0.0014636584,0.0009869472,0.00024633994],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.004095678,0.00022540198,0.30958053,0.016271887,0.002479818,0.0021937026,0.023393443,0.0022779019,0.0068881703,0.12274147,0.15590988,0.35394207],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001147557,0.00018593021,0.72082776,0.0020456684,0.002322156,0.0003631162,0.008904341,0.00023731243,0.0012105133,0.00094630895,0.26273838,0.00010372179],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.574513,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.80081296,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.574513,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.019240772,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.033494372,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8559855},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2979843472","doi":"","title":"Edwards v Attorney‐General for Canada (1930)","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.025694178086829944,"score_gpt":0.23581948786598,"score_spread":0.21012530977915006,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2979843472","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009215901,0.011369145,0.0005765857,0.02569058,0.0018727578,0.0001371754,0.0011176233,0.0000965201,0.9499237],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.058182426,0.002336504,0.0004903674,0.030428462,0.00019684137,0.00008420322,0.00014917714,0.0000634871,0.9080686],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997198,0.0001478239,0.00006179896,0.00023667043,0.0010339676,0.0013217108],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986986,0.0003469246,0.00003404959,0.00003614525,0.00068121194,0.00020298838],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015194858,0.00070813583,0.00050583616,0.0022572426,0.019123634,0.007304361,0.0018983579,0.012294542,0.019704578],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0054127984,0.00096018636,0.0006445085,0.0026063456,0.0039825686,0.00199987,0.0017504201,0.00826467,0.0025601292],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031125277,0.000023552382,0.0010390189,0.000054639175,0.0000104989585,0.00048012208,0.0034750255,0.00016715696,0.00018372244,0.4065911,0.5716251,0.016318858],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013429228,0.000007613972,0.0024674197,0.00017003948,0.000018919003,0.0001412251,0.0011452266,0.00010094038,0.00020776747,0.013601395,0.9820759,0.000050087863],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98493606,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99494344,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06349668,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06349668,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.122666605,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.46070284},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2982233201","doi":"","title":"Substance and Procedure in Private International Law by Richard Garnett","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Melbourne journal of international law","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Publishing; Project commissioning; Conflict of laws; Political science; Sociology; Media studies","score_opus":0.010014374189077474,"score_gpt":0.2740219235597967,"score_spread":0.26400754937071924,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2982233201","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006632348,0.061911702,0.0029112687,0.6689297,0.010275253,0.00003190924,0.00003693352,0.000027474789,0.2492434],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2894707,0.042368207,0.0029860542,0.18602641,0.012879957,0.00015710763,0.000039642477,0.00019316997,0.46587878],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961767,0.0020192594,0.00014045888,0.0004292107,0.00083632226,0.00039798944],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99229616,0.0060524154,0.00026151843,0.00025215067,0.0006303481,0.00050733675],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005385278,0.00047179416,0.000774016,0.0013374463,0.008410662,0.008416729,0.0014342115,0.011836478,0.004809148],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013872126,0.00072557665,0.0004541384,0.0013985543,0.018972302,0.012319612,0.003500768,0.01839273,0.0009898782],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015982972,0.000029539924,0.00013906664,0.000033663535,0.0000054110114,0.00007376939,0.004734574,0.00024394109,0.000037834638,0.8250231,0.16189401,0.007769108],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015495929,0.000015541691,0.00052052335,0.00039174207,0.000010718189,0.00008761896,0.004947521,0.00037149218,0.00007956917,0.3723481,0.6211729,0.000038782022],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04356239,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07195003,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04356239,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005253282,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0057457555,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08661765},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2991368215","doi":"10.5539/jpl.v12n4p79","title":"On the Establishment and Application of Broad Prohibition of Repeated Suits in Chinese Law – With “The Requests in the Latter Lawsuit Essentially Deny the Judgement in the Former Lawsuit” as the Object","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Politics and Law","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Lawsuit; Law; Element (criminal law); Civil procedure; Judgement; Obligation; Political science","score_opus":0.0074096594414209726,"score_gpt":0.27845177316236713,"score_spread":0.27104211372094617,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2991368215","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18302903,0.0032095525,0.02736741,0.015015229,0.00082607626,0.000905361,0.00026534585,0.00010233615,0.7692796],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92195886,0.0016963101,0.0073298593,0.0047389553,0.000384948,0.00042435102,0.00008820628,0.000022660375,0.06335563],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99481356,0.0011528614,0.00045953752,0.00094261166,0.0018832504,0.000748277],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99851054,0.000643876,0.00016521318,0.00021120087,0.0003657202,0.00010352392],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004077584,0.00046517845,0.0002746434,0.0014136188,0.0048661907,0.0034852738,0.0012724639,0.0028602525,0.003120041],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004997611,0.0004517042,0.0006174145,0.0013374991,0.015755925,0.0032620605,0.0024071604,0.0034324443,0.00044096302],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022979833,0.000018687282,0.0016648798,0.000082664585,0.000011009389,0.00065331045,0.008810743,0.00027038244,0.0010858378,0.9722118,0.0038726013,0.01129516],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008305589,0.0002588146,0.06646225,0.0010943995,0.0002392344,0.0013206576,0.007594748,0.00916607,0.008190915,0.54260147,0.36260664,0.000381767],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06254943,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08550414,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06254943,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0070261923,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013004415,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.124370694},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2991960392","doi":"","title":"Marriage and cohabitation contracts","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cohabitation; Business; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.011275600041635128,"score_gpt":0.29874217455912305,"score_spread":0.2874665745174879,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2991960392","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02152289,0.00431169,0.00073341205,0.015287712,0.0009831267,0.00026867705,0.11814035,0.00008766942,0.8386645],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.19136363,0.008196617,0.00118404,0.004343994,0.0014513,0.0004975756,0.10429993,0.00013571129,0.6885272],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99960345,0.00006631226,0.000038382255,0.000032107888,0.0001764821,0.00008330718],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980211,0.0008327643,0.0002204901,0.0000775084,0.000664882,0.00018338987],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00036314683,0.00023112114,0.00017825821,0.0020662753,0.0017514245,0.0008603935,0.0003886444,0.0006126705,0.23997834],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0039886395,0.00017541542,0.0001687895,0.0049535153,0.00033509225,0.0010495386,0.0008580454,0.0007347094,0.024553355],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006910785,0.00004546602,0.0068096416,0.00033157313,0.000009062367,0.00028382277,0.0020182324,0.00008860246,0.000078998644,0.05437812,0.8910463,0.04484112],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024078041,0.000025563224,0.07322842,0.00035003506,0.000009628171,0.00035643135,0.0028751432,0.00010954829,0.0001701473,0.010005664,0.91283035,0.000015004157],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.055819582,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07841167,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23997834,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008371075,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015232487,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.80280757},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2993622183","doi":"","title":"Culture Change - A Tale of Two Cities and Mandatory Court-Connected Mediation","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mediation; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.026913421353771914,"score_gpt":0.2780342440047755,"score_spread":0.2511208226510036,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2993622183","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9513395,0.0007140494,0.0006041866,0.016477095,0.00013323645,0.000043759122,0.000031885756,0.000020202111,0.03063607],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980696,0.00016758281,0.000121081226,0.00052456337,0.000007871152,0.000010676412,0.000008817297,0.0000062688373,0.0010835321],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99420655,0.002711605,0.00012434776,0.00052537536,0.0009370873,0.0014949827],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9936645,0.0018145985,0.0010935636,0.00060289685,0.00092211633,0.0019022542],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003970791,0.0003473024,0.0005969131,0.0022320864,0.031101614,0.012621412,0.0023420234,0.0018261811,0.0051570563],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009022679,0.00048772251,0.00038166178,0.0034053477,0.024573304,0.005486266,0.013187286,0.0044325236,0.00017764162],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011695218,0.00019530278,0.07898809,0.00011175247,0.00005878813,0.0015357272,0.8318564,0.00015492362,0.00063150894,0.057606332,0.004275382,0.024468808],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012934022,0.000050604955,0.046790745,0.0000988626,0.000027578506,0.0002155578,0.93169934,0.00018062131,0.00021888866,0.0042365696,0.016421217,0.000047088906],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.35818198,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.576594,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.35818198,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.022062482,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01888281,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.71219426},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2994269004","doi":"10.3138/cjcrim.42.3.355","title":"Gladue: The judicial and political reception of a promising decision","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Criminology","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":30,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Politics; Political science; Judicial opinion; Law and economics; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.04809534679410901,"score_gpt":0.31309349475969894,"score_spread":0.26499814796558996,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2994269004","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.042041913,0.0012139176,0.011521703,0.17057075,0.0030519515,0.00005560766,0.0001526871,0.00019509284,0.7711964],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9204932,0.00040953778,0.0025974894,0.01310749,0.0010224599,0.000047421527,0.00005155261,0.00020465587,0.062066186],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99441963,0.0030843804,0.00008467373,0.00035199863,0.0011280082,0.0009313005],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98190653,0.012136182,0.00081610243,0.0009431242,0.0024988004,0.0016992441],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006214819,0.00033410176,0.00033872292,0.0018651428,0.011175428,0.012010405,0.0013981415,0.011505996,0.028309861],"category_scores_gemma":[0.054980665,0.00036702352,0.0004383616,0.0013374188,0.010306355,0.0069205444,0.0040201466,0.010376375,0.0024419494],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013816191,0.000038644375,0.0010283769,0.00003846934,0.000013929046,0.001173636,0.015991606,0.00027626017,0.0006449965,0.86882555,0.096295275,0.015535146],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006449275,0.00007280522,0.003031956,0.00020690987,0.000038645107,0.0006265698,0.0323334,0.0019930215,0.000809945,0.5528988,0.40782502,0.0000984202],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01453222,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0438614,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9854678,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0042437366,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005369379,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09470588},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W2999433751","doi":"","title":"Of Magnets and Centrifuges: The US and EU Federal Systems and Private International Law","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"European union; Conflict of laws; Law; Political science; Tribute; Federal law; International law; Private law; Context (archaeology); Comparative law; Legislation; Business; International trade; Geography","score_opus":0.006089811896752751,"score_gpt":0.24844578656795285,"score_spread":0.2423559746712001,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W2999433751","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06802331,0.08492728,0.0056786267,0.15161058,0.0009294712,0.000027386892,0.00010098407,0.000057214675,0.6886451],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9042691,0.023128634,0.0019491597,0.020313205,0.0006794719,0.00008375443,0.00007792907,0.000046077577,0.049452666],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957789,0.0022416317,0.00013575835,0.0003433573,0.00078443147,0.0007159269],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99818015,0.0011312997,0.0002563818,0.0001133051,0.00018161096,0.00013724582],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003654283,0.00018868498,0.00027482962,0.001485397,0.004698736,0.0123535,0.00066335336,0.0046046367,0.0050299936],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004722276,0.00026347637,0.00035842793,0.0026340368,0.01526932,0.01029071,0.003492233,0.0039375257,0.0004801922],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004699627,0.000003957558,0.0001971436,0.000010599078,0.0000011175129,0.00001902574,0.001185226,0.000050189574,0.00001814952,0.9887333,0.005085773,0.0046909116],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014620557,0.000040205632,0.0062397434,0.000714885,0.000012975114,0.00018485352,0.011646783,0.0006075995,0.00023474729,0.56161314,0.4186532,0.00003717707],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017956857,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02629459,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017956857,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0099738,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0053735464,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.072365284},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3000242353","doi":"10.1177/1023263x19888590","title":"Transatlantic enforcement of Dutch collective settlement judgments: the case of Canada","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Settlement (finance); Appeal; Human settlement; Enforcement; Class action; Political science; Law; Collective action; Perspective (graphical); European court of justice; Law and economics; Sociology; Business; Geography; International trade; European Union law; European union; Politics; Archaeology","score_opus":0.06147016887756197,"score_gpt":0.2843131598444432,"score_spread":0.22284299096688126,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3000242353","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6363689,0.003514265,0.0022475075,0.037228465,0.00025742376,0.00015402203,0.00035483547,0.000034026067,0.3198406],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9745623,0.0010882025,0.0006555004,0.0019632147,0.00003452018,0.000039908162,0.000063780244,0.000017653627,0.021574972],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98786515,0.0013087427,0.00035334856,0.000999237,0.0038668786,0.005606572],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99195826,0.002752121,0.0007020984,0.00043469443,0.002817997,0.0013348351],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0062017622,0.00046884778,0.0006805401,0.0016993782,0.034687854,0.009680849,0.003177757,0.006778523,0.005055806],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01851049,0.00060230016,0.00066423806,0.0033856153,0.00899687,0.0018239869,0.005131939,0.007036893,0.000386269],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002364835,0.00017270773,0.03617416,0.0002036699,0.00020853101,0.0120971855,0.086316824,0.005392775,0.0015647121,0.7698238,0.046874225,0.040935066],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00037106796,0.00012438576,0.076427944,0.0011970364,0.0006824971,0.0034064378,0.21216394,0.01482797,0.0043759723,0.055038393,0.63054526,0.0008391736],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9914675,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99578613,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09982577,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09982577,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1400552,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.72429},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3003349098","doi":"10.36253/978-88-6655-255-0","title":"La mediazione familiare. Modelli, principi, obiettivi","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Studi e saggi","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Mediation; Subject matter; Jurisprudence; Perspective (graphical); Law; Sociology; Law and economics","score_opus":0.021860788264776197,"score_gpt":0.2966032637889476,"score_spread":0.27474247552417136,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3003349098","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0016963056,0.04026172,0.011347575,0.018528374,0.0021625988,0.00003599239,0.00010931287,0.00018376356,0.9256743],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.28256047,0.04914345,0.012785614,0.00999226,0.0064468123,0.00053968764,0.00030405732,0.000723374,0.6375043],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99873513,0.00070371816,0.00002886733,0.00016134937,0.000273707,0.00009729205],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992256,0.00048909173,0.00005555325,0.000097770964,0.00007846796,0.000053547712],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010880298,0.0010254664,0.0004273784,0.0017991953,0.0032272313,0.009920248,0.0010451245,0.0015929503,0.0139242485],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022155473,0.00030788715,0.00039224347,0.0018592115,0.014004318,0.009746629,0.002668232,0.004995866,0.0035319803],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000039333504,0.000005875719,0.000032076925,0.00004451601,0.0000014458595,0.000016902932,0.0021177,0.000060759543,0.000034292858,0.97231007,0.018512273,0.0068601347],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004441102,0.000010217316,0.00012916127,0.0002408714,0.0000035187602,0.000078376885,0.0014280068,0.00020777744,0.0000811099,0.20937511,0.78843504,0.0000063890843],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0043416647,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00510386,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0139242485,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006344787,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00245882,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04658121},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3003431644","doi":"","title":"Recognizing the Relevance of Human Rights: The Application of the Presumption of Conformity in the Context of Copyright","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Presumption; Conformity; Context (archaeology); Human rights; Law and economics; Relevance (law); Presumption of innocence; Intellectual property; Law; Political science; Conformity assessment; Business; Sociology; Economics; Geography","score_opus":0.022731631576189907,"score_gpt":0.3042069912945416,"score_spread":0.2814753597183517,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3003431644","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07734336,0.004872836,0.06692582,0.24628621,0.001548971,0.00031334625,0.00006735325,0.000061444436,0.6025807],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9591688,0.0012893362,0.01087457,0.017412888,0.000604524,0.00013040102,0.000019385228,0.000030688752,0.010469462],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9591418,0.020312859,0.0015173856,0.0035642025,0.010817746,0.004646137],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95741105,0.029256064,0.002601144,0.0035383115,0.00577773,0.0014156053],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.043073326,0.00055196177,0.001025738,0.0024030108,0.016663017,0.014290194,0.0043190904,0.014353805,0.0026173722],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07465078,0.00060686993,0.0012324889,0.0015786543,0.13356374,0.014446359,0.011886968,0.017897412,0.00031172714],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000033279284,0.000004508573,0.00021344879,0.000011097084,0.0000032032224,0.00019796232,0.004758115,0.0001713986,0.00005396589,0.99261415,0.0004910179,0.0014778287],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019391735,0.000023641738,0.0007099309,0.0002519425,0.000016158268,0.00021347604,0.005992119,0.00071334874,0.00036360143,0.9560763,0.035571255,0.000048849663],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.22855175,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16107716,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22855175,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.021866433,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.047220483,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.45444286},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3006902917","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190695620.013.7","title":"Postcolonial Legal Studies","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Orientalism; Scholarship; Reading (process); Field (mathematics); Sign (mathematics); Sociology; History; Political science; Law; Literature; Art","score_opus":0.05113801757809438,"score_gpt":0.2764375093115878,"score_spread":0.2252994917334934,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3006902917","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02774122,0.043677587,0.00054257247,0.045001686,0.0012179245,0.0000216773,0.00006623266,0.000022874709,0.8817083],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.746646,0.037184693,0.0005116407,0.010837407,0.0010304621,0.000094024435,0.00012452425,0.000041782423,0.2035295],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99775714,0.0013426896,0.000051033,0.00014677845,0.00039788778,0.00030458395],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9955348,0.0028722817,0.00026336874,0.00027546793,0.00066777045,0.0003863397],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024312215,0.00031757238,0.0002284557,0.0023716378,0.0066976333,0.006707017,0.0010817555,0.0020427404,0.011261507],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0043926346,0.00011360686,0.00011816671,0.0032457027,0.01869162,0.0032292719,0.0031918443,0.003685821,0.0010220902],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000055614746,0.0000316588,0.00030812426,0.00010152268,0.0000019943725,0.00026333783,0.046691295,0.00004932537,0.000090742535,0.8985668,0.036478646,0.017411007],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000037603031,0.0000104886785,0.0013988026,0.0006661398,0.0000015889784,0.000097434204,0.023114864,0.000059081616,0.00012203017,0.040087543,0.9344324,0.000005932816],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.027030218,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04005103,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027030218,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018598583,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006121365,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13494283},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3010365700","doi":"","title":"A Survey and Critique of the “Seller in Possession” Statutory Regimes of Common Law Canada: An ABC Prequel","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statutory law; Law; Possession (linguistics); Common law; Political science; Comparative law; Civil law (Civil law); Public law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.01603979151317123,"score_gpt":0.28702845409056554,"score_spread":0.2709886625773943,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3010365700","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06180622,0.04651341,0.014993009,0.32985118,0.000967294,0.000115453324,0.0006048382,0.00013651486,0.54501206],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91846466,0.02537538,0.0041124797,0.028125262,0.000498316,0.00008491338,0.0001872617,0.00010751176,0.023044141],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98366815,0.002637351,0.00045272722,0.0013190471,0.0086885635,0.0032341152],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97482634,0.012024944,0.0010547301,0.0012752534,0.009374718,0.001443941],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013361176,0.00061774947,0.00090397376,0.0072397864,0.02006649,0.020449413,0.005684155,0.006965959,0.003677885],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024261586,0.000794264,0.0007645131,0.0139565375,0.0541042,0.0065462263,0.003059243,0.011039023,0.00031567007],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006279382,0.000009569255,0.0011053478,0.00004828928,0.0000063629036,0.00006955679,0.005255169,0.0004062361,0.000039232254,0.97220135,0.011204586,0.009647955],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002565596,0.000024506457,0.012295104,0.0019278146,0.00005498656,0.0001866754,0.033916872,0.004230663,0.0004470798,0.3421809,0.60453457,0.00017514467],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9816737,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9816368,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17223562,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.17223562,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1886997,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9600893},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3010920414","doi":"","title":"Whose Law Governs Your Data?: Takedown Orders and 'Territoriality' in Comparative Perspective","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Political science; Territoriality; European union; Order (exchange); Law; International law; Comity; Law and economics; Business; Sociology; International trade","score_opus":0.10713339401268357,"score_gpt":0.4113434876144245,"score_spread":0.30421009360174095,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3010920414","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07118068,0.023437092,0.009123613,0.034078073,0.0003886396,0.000035814206,0.000060207716,0.000024533094,0.8616713],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97510713,0.0063765165,0.0011447689,0.003499108,0.00022786648,0.00005665563,0.00004993052,0.00005172752,0.013486275],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98986757,0.00632617,0.00023624611,0.00088554,0.0013798531,0.0013045649],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9930784,0.0050346795,0.0004545321,0.00042898298,0.00067356264,0.00032981034],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0070430133,0.00034345043,0.0006943171,0.0030594408,0.01637244,0.022328522,0.0017062463,0.005111379,0.004693921],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009057742,0.00037413984,0.00051819254,0.0047580376,0.07418095,0.020073172,0.0080846585,0.0066012065,0.0004379698],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003457353,0.0000036798099,0.00022708368,0.000027952008,0.0000025477266,0.00011000702,0.03783271,0.000035218014,0.000046370882,0.95906675,0.000913481,0.0017308294],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012645888,0.00004050526,0.003895977,0.0009792892,0.0000350901,0.00064929784,0.2431577,0.00035671954,0.00041464053,0.28303665,0.46738088,0.00004067577],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03696839,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.035716098,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03696839,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015597435,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0058122366,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11316782},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3011226166","doi":"","title":"Amending Authors and Constitutional Discourse","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law; Constitutional law","score_opus":0.031353111407934495,"score_gpt":0.3063425613770974,"score_spread":0.2749894499691629,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3011226166","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.037749015,0.033554893,0.012459446,0.07419561,0.0020016294,0.000062138235,0.0000688607,0.00014439417,0.83976406],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9277817,0.009825861,0.0041395766,0.005011691,0.001769512,0.00007327928,0.000079844795,0.00008867419,0.051229928],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9823903,0.008858606,0.0007516631,0.0013833484,0.0049935556,0.001622574],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9726442,0.021173468,0.0015067572,0.0012706888,0.002768239,0.00063657353],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00994334,0.00042852227,0.0006581484,0.005939208,0.0147776995,0.018055668,0.0018812107,0.0049254033,0.0045359074],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02853019,0.00038186193,0.00042795096,0.006468642,0.055271123,0.011345347,0.0050616693,0.0054062284,0.000615483],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002262671,0.0000028797524,0.0001126154,0.000014911299,7.56232e-7,0.000033007353,0.010049874,0.000043547523,0.000021333515,0.9847488,0.0012108445,0.0037591937],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015622287,0.00001479111,0.0005608802,0.00048440057,0.000011966629,0.00012574435,0.01491312,0.00024987938,0.00030319835,0.51191777,0.47137004,0.000032587883],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03349777,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03891153,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03349777,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.025698008,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015358685,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18645298},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3012435264","doi":"10.19195/0137-1134.112.14","title":"Hipoteka polska a hypothèque prowincji Quebec. Porównanie z perspektywy prawa prywatnego międzynarodowego","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Przegląd Prawa i Administracji","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Scope (computer science); Law; Private law; Conflict of laws; Doctrine; Element (criminal law); Perspective (graphical); Comparative law; International law","score_opus":0.02547096924191811,"score_gpt":0.3448648622684423,"score_spread":0.3193938930265242,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3012435264","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4798618,0.007922311,0.005298769,0.029547753,0.00025973518,0.00021710609,0.0014329713,0.00011366285,0.47534585],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.929604,0.0020559484,0.0009302837,0.0013847002,0.000013735725,0.000033978064,0.00017586422,0.000019253728,0.06578225],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991943,0.000089269226,0.000030894633,0.00016269581,0.00022982527,0.00029309752],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999345,0.0001393198,0.000110425346,0.000058004793,0.00023992431,0.00010730211],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006405965,0.0002597735,0.00017757388,0.00083725987,0.005458511,0.0058321864,0.00056214514,0.0011719296,0.007500965],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015167334,0.00026073077,0.0001906006,0.0012215349,0.00510643,0.0013906996,0.0013496489,0.002131585,0.00040224646],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007823176,0.000048636342,0.023688504,0.00017501379,0.000041131927,0.0018824907,0.01393676,0.00078078476,0.0020948297,0.8900298,0.029544715,0.037699126],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000053641932,0.000059120022,0.17304084,0.0005129796,0.000109150824,0.001413049,0.040881496,0.002946963,0.0040125735,0.04849572,0.7282965,0.00017798251],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9476244,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96806943,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.052375615,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.024420736,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.032929588,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17718571},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3013584812","doi":"10.32082/fp.v5i55.263","title":"Nie koniec historii: dynamika prawa na przykładzie instytucji zasiedzenia","year":2020,"lang":"pl","type":"article","venue":"Forum Prawnicze","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Theology; Political science; Physics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03014482125171007,"score_gpt":0.2768719590568252,"score_spread":0.24672713780511513,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3013584812","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08597276,0.020930614,0.007108028,0.0634529,0.00085939985,0.00005576606,0.00034674266,0.00016734471,0.82110643],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8364073,0.011205464,0.0018313738,0.0047697234,0.0004683783,0.00007743325,0.00016533624,0.00020899482,0.14486594],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99805826,0.0006665568,0.00009911206,0.00041774742,0.0004330123,0.00032532573],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984475,0.0005919174,0.00027057162,0.00025944717,0.00027428055,0.00015645946],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020775718,0.00034630147,0.00032060195,0.0022492667,0.0055672973,0.015153441,0.0007429131,0.0017985223,0.016378086],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004749661,0.00045027418,0.00029093924,0.003766868,0.012846582,0.009207826,0.0055168844,0.003281872,0.0016418681],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019611314,0.000013790363,0.0023964883,0.00006783189,0.000012212168,0.00020411228,0.017980127,0.00016808468,0.00015860377,0.94856435,0.014055845,0.01635891],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015003821,0.000019802606,0.007894332,0.00038080214,0.00002477936,0.00035622247,0.021545103,0.00042186078,0.00041928858,0.27589285,0.6929915,0.000038435137],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016530998,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019815134,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016530998,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0075954637,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00588699,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.055109203},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3015260480","doi":"10.5206/uwojls.v10i1.10229","title":"The Evolution of the Duty to Consult","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Western Journal of Legal Studies","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tribunal; Appeal; Duty; Supreme court; Political science; Agency (philosophy); Subject (documents); Law; Indigenous; Work (physics); TRACE (psycholinguistics); Process (computing); Abandonment (legal); Sociology; Engineering; Computer science","score_opus":0.04893452292364313,"score_gpt":0.3429191904893343,"score_spread":0.29398466756569114,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3015260480","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0604318,0.0040119826,0.046212595,0.36980453,0.0013707143,0.00016449102,0.000065225664,0.00013874708,0.5178],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90536404,0.0013576036,0.01552405,0.046734188,0.00066567736,0.00018020564,0.00003635863,0.00014670663,0.02999117],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9306765,0.032661334,0.003524783,0.0084907785,0.018853428,0.005793304],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.89426553,0.06531058,0.0048355474,0.010261167,0.017374804,0.007952286],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.045033514,0.0002345778,0.00063555944,0.0025194953,0.020585367,0.01982776,0.0039431495,0.024157424,0.0055958414],"category_scores_gemma":[0.12909888,0.0008743956,0.0006799612,0.0019497938,0.07905618,0.016969282,0.0153771555,0.022680512,0.001054231],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007482007,0.000012757873,0.00032809973,0.000017627925,0.000002157602,0.0001587229,0.010214547,0.00011021415,0.000122050755,0.9767769,0.0041642194,0.0080851745],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002505694,0.00004173622,0.0017937571,0.00054939743,0.000011402335,0.0007645507,0.012842464,0.0012175663,0.0004949507,0.6713219,0.31084362,0.00009349625],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.029136833,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020830607,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.045033514,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.026696395,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.031744365,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23816282},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3016181407","doi":"","title":"The Ontario Court of Appeal challenges the Canadian Competition Authority over potentially defamatory language it used in a website press release posting (TPG Technology Consulting / Donald Powell / Canada)","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"e-Competitions Bulletin","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Competition (biology); Law; Business; Political science; Media studies; Sociology; Biology; Ecology","score_opus":0.016755511048093887,"score_gpt":0.25221814211281485,"score_spread":0.23546263106472096,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3016181407","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.025164383,0.0011288628,0.0013216285,0.5300721,0.005081998,0.00050579023,0.0015299143,0.00035154185,0.43484384],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.09659707,0.0008012929,0.0015103406,0.2394241,0.0010515181,0.00024050617,0.00032782883,0.00031571684,0.65973157],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98342955,0.00061943865,0.00052702165,0.000925375,0.008465273,0.006033438],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97809106,0.0059849853,0.00047590942,0.0005349117,0.011394122,0.0035188845],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0070191,0.0008603156,0.0011656431,0.0028095585,0.054452114,0.01558495,0.0046071555,0.038239483,0.03140228],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028804336,0.0021330602,0.0019456346,0.0034476584,0.007513059,0.0031052302,0.0030187154,0.028914958,0.005024059],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004856193,0.00005171457,0.0019770723,0.000051325875,0.000029853325,0.00096356234,0.0030715864,0.00014063096,0.0006363774,0.08261585,0.9036488,0.0067646895],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007350183,0.000027069435,0.00702859,0.00012471751,0.000110420166,0.00017097023,0.0049822936,0.0007528827,0.00084183767,0.0043819607,0.98132885,0.00017692172],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9900484,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99728966,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0992682,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0992682,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.27482167,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7202445},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3016242284","doi":"","title":"Conceptualizing the Relationship between International Human Rights Law and Private International Law","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Harvard international law journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Private law; Human rights; Political science; Municipal law; Law; International human rights law; International law; Public law; Public international law; Convention; Comparative law; Law and economics; Fundamental rights; Context (archaeology); Doctrine; Sociology; Geography","score_opus":0.04501395622463918,"score_gpt":0.3359462139225189,"score_spread":0.2909322576978797,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3016242284","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0503492,0.00583035,0.09255328,0.040656853,0.0003958398,0.00014202,0.00006838777,0.00007943469,0.8099246],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9790622,0.0019449954,0.008621224,0.0023673766,0.00026990162,0.00018574159,0.00004224843,0.000030744097,0.0074755205],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9925126,0.004037219,0.000244938,0.00093876524,0.0012793776,0.0009871351],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99480516,0.0033023816,0.00059528166,0.00061120756,0.00027803206,0.00040796938],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009583574,0.00062037207,0.00054075534,0.0045407717,0.004644398,0.015589823,0.0021062172,0.0061584557,0.0053154617],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0079735285,0.00048149133,0.00060571794,0.0032768084,0.09008035,0.02314567,0.008753688,0.0074907695,0.00040188865],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[3.5382925e-7,0.0000014917013,0.000038578946,0.0000025450622,3.468e-7,0.0000062684076,0.0005305514,0.000033291435,0.000006489816,0.9990715,0.00004236996,0.0002660498],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000063070197,0.000009962234,0.0003329227,0.00009453031,0.000004629124,0.000043778644,0.0028075946,0.0004817817,0.00004384976,0.9801844,0.01598401,0.000006325657],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0042462964,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0036845673,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015589823,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008889927,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0071438407,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.064501226},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3022722483","doi":"","title":"The Deconstitutionalization of Canadian Private International Law","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Knowledge@SchulichLaw","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Law; Jurisdiction; Supreme court; Political science; Federalism; Constitutional law; Foundation (evidence); Spar; Engineering","score_opus":0.0228525492798454,"score_gpt":0.30121431506693697,"score_spread":0.27836176578709154,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3022722483","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.023738254,0.0035802678,0.004804886,0.1018245,0.00076681754,0.00003482988,0.0003278773,0.0000813651,0.8648412],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8569893,0.0034586913,0.00331286,0.020257771,0.0004199195,0.000056076475,0.00024264633,0.00014203777,0.11512073],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9918046,0.0009061094,0.00014591488,0.0009415274,0.003868831,0.0023331167],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9946872,0.0010069085,0.00020486367,0.0005627042,0.0028491088,0.0006891445],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003157048,0.00043214756,0.0004594298,0.0025283187,0.017471993,0.012868199,0.0019963346,0.004526751,0.007627845],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014319359,0.0004431948,0.000518449,0.003303788,0.024289552,0.0039890106,0.00416905,0.007571982,0.0005605083],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000031161285,0.0000015057766,0.00011855304,0.000007557514,0.0000016743469,0.000021050957,0.0014178453,0.00009251147,0.000030763797,0.98646414,0.008615489,0.003225747],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002183509,0.000009106006,0.0039816685,0.00021885782,0.00002683573,0.000107497304,0.0049625705,0.0012734578,0.0003326859,0.37647763,0.61252934,0.000058470523],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.972645,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9794384,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.103060655,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.103060655,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13593721,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7477609},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3023287867","doi":"10.2307/j.ctv5vdctx.9","title":"Chaoulli v Quebec:","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of Ottawa Press eBooks","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"History","score_opus":0.027252614949996912,"score_gpt":0.23425467274110445,"score_spread":0.20700205779110753,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3023287867","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007237007,0.02723698,0.00046493975,0.0184027,0.0010353206,0.00008612167,0.0019737307,0.00010874202,0.9434545],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.046504818,0.0052128346,0.00046283726,0.003780588,0.000095916286,0.000069304,0.00030999558,0.00006861349,0.94349504],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989937,0.000105714265,0.000027003387,0.00011921136,0.0003401017,0.00041427035],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994259,0.00009089215,0.000028948658,0.000044639914,0.00030953044,0.0001000718],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00065088354,0.00079944875,0.0005113688,0.0019016747,0.013005179,0.008106506,0.00165731,0.0046863286,0.077397004],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0019123063,0.0006903948,0.00052544783,0.003175578,0.002788026,0.002369964,0.0015016319,0.0048876153,0.004533228],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000052113533,0.000043201453,0.0016316666,0.00019252693,0.00002033374,0.00047236064,0.0032237738,0.00033713083,0.00023872961,0.3032753,0.64096844,0.04954442],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001049892,0.0000047628223,0.0025135488,0.00017050933,0.000009394287,0.000073297604,0.0011777745,0.00012587135,0.00012127022,0.004113425,0.99165714,0.000022468404],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99166614,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99724436,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.077397004,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07245483,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09895664,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5256991},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3034359653","doi":"","title":"比較的レンズをとおした仲裁の考察：一般的原則と具体的争点 (Looking at Arbitration through A Comparative Lens: General Principles and Specific Issues)","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Arbitration; Dispute resolution; Common law; Law; Comparative law; Political science; Mediation; Civil law (Civil law); China; Alternative dispute resolution; English law; Public law","score_opus":0.07152819640180234,"score_gpt":0.3263341953587405,"score_spread":0.2548059989569381,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3034359653","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.027374098,0.034221973,0.04723112,0.056038428,0.0008736664,0.000115387826,0.000059193382,0.000040883046,0.8340453],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9447663,0.0063237916,0.0070741936,0.004454803,0.0011795046,0.00032525448,0.000033600554,0.00010635915,0.035736237],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98853314,0.008236785,0.00037907966,0.0009813112,0.0010764231,0.0007932824],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9881215,0.009553009,0.00074186386,0.00048693307,0.00074365037,0.00035303418],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015277454,0.0008950419,0.00084664597,0.0041189543,0.011556854,0.016164584,0.0027777902,0.007818297,0.008977612],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015482621,0.00067057955,0.0008214191,0.005613573,0.0661056,0.027794167,0.0066452036,0.00771147,0.00061525987],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000022905908,0.0000023115656,0.000022330965,0.000024548208,0.00000134604,0.000032534055,0.0065744584,0.000030219211,0.000017773227,0.99221355,0.00038561234,0.00069303234],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015501742,0.000017529916,0.00035826888,0.00033139717,0.000012649379,0.00013022375,0.013277218,0.0004318474,0.00017976842,0.91882354,0.06640493,0.00001711882],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0073289406,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005081664,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016164584,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011790214,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006911116,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08554441},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3039612490","doi":"10.3968/11724","title":"International Copyright Law","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian social science","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Intellectual property; Copyright law; Scope (computer science); Law; Treaty; Political science; Subject matter; Convention; Moral rights; Copyright Act; Law and economics; International law; Subject (documents); Common law copyright; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.02575879050887778,"score_gpt":0.3006881086349127,"score_spread":0.2749293181260349,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3039612490","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00281218,0.0035604383,0.0049889334,0.005917257,0.00067760254,0.000077964796,0.00020169446,0.000096863354,0.98166716],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4186638,0.016847685,0.015240175,0.016396588,0.0036843359,0.000831,0.0015437381,0.00038452412,0.5264082],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97851115,0.003218216,0.0014791478,0.003295462,0.011544261,0.0019518031],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98314613,0.0055135395,0.0014965666,0.004653731,0.0043662093,0.0008238817],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012423675,0.0007213166,0.0007590342,0.004117079,0.0059212265,0.01325802,0.0020669342,0.005063413,0.034801506],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0366958,0.0004217204,0.0008919448,0.005010296,0.012619427,0.010311297,0.005298333,0.0070909606,0.007278675],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000032224289,0.00000674887,0.0001342641,0.000026045516,0.0000031417171,0.000023996268,0.0005295547,0.0000365734,0.00006559836,0.97838473,0.008765333,0.01202079],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008645625,0.000023935874,0.0008004614,0.00044724456,0.0000193344,0.00020685131,0.0006669774,0.00018983282,0.0003364593,0.16378784,0.83349293,0.0000195131],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010157061,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006397674,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.034801506,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0061594336,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011371917,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11642265},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3048873214","doi":"","title":"FOREWORD: Legal Essays: A Checklist","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Checklist; Sociology; Law; Political science; Psychology","score_opus":0.022565913414219874,"score_gpt":0.2817222981809641,"score_spread":0.25915638476674424,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3048873214","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0423193,0.020734457,0.058435984,0.15551418,0.08924427,0.11511033,0.17032756,0.014673359,0.33364055],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.07295042,0.01909624,0.3385853,0.03351631,0.018496456,0.1316472,0.12331466,0.007272548,0.2551209],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97709763,0.0053943205,0.007675619,0.0005916217,0.008511439,0.00072933425],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7680353,0.043578416,0.019836498,0.005929739,0.15050712,0.012112875],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013956747,0.0019353834,0.0018794494,0.025108667,0.0054136175,0.0051703546,0.0027802428,0.0029244425,0.07091689],"category_scores_gemma":[0.12568733,0.0010061063,0.0010311946,0.013985999,0.0020587074,0.0060076145,0.004510887,0.0042904806,0.05396098],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006804617,0.00014023193,0.0011571881,0.0019086798,0.0000063800344,0.00018054522,0.0010009697,0.000082192695,0.0010770228,0.0016774347,0.9320941,0.060607336],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003213198,0.00009191066,0.0044142604,0.0018305675,0.00000857243,0.00026116075,0.0019157344,0.00009203521,0.0003508405,0.0014139852,0.98954415,0.000044701374],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0031637915,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00770442,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07091689,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00410759,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013027907,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23724061},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W305326441","doi":"","title":"Celebrating the 50th Anniversary of the Jessup Moot Court Competition","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the Annual Meeting-American Society of International Law","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; International law; Economic Justice; Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.00918782458745182,"score_gpt":0.2647899019119019,"score_spread":0.25560207732445006,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W305326441","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013529968,0.016787274,0.00096708845,0.21969706,0.18007709,0.0001232997,0.0011583192,0.00038880928,0.567271],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.037706796,0.0029078675,0.00045042377,0.017447326,0.015206451,0.00007170568,0.0005971227,0.0002451033,0.9253673],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977125,0.00017894745,0.000057747176,0.00026285162,0.0010746076,0.00071330724],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964574,0.00010875418,0.00012794496,0.0001095033,0.00061429065,0.0025821421],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021760748,0.0008223726,0.0005371118,0.0012754992,0.009494009,0.008578697,0.001158312,0.0044051874,0.089382984],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0038330208,0.0004041352,0.00053573865,0.00071088615,0.0017149412,0.0029120632,0.008822069,0.0069895694,0.024989445],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016050646,0.000026522719,0.00021203823,0.000018202045,0.0000016851156,0.00011182776,0.00021313482,0.000017827664,0.00012186623,0.0048009087,0.98590404,0.00855595],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000021951018,0.000012143591,0.001280303,0.00005719814,7.818871e-7,0.000042106018,0.00035126184,0.000021664506,0.000059286318,0.0006035117,0.997563,0.0000064712476],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023277154,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.089159556,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.089382984,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004113891,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032935243,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29901582},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W306366585","doi":"","title":"Britain permits controversial genetic test.","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PubMed","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Test (biology); Genetics; Biology; Psychology; Ecology","score_opus":0.015622975241329789,"score_gpt":0.24354805891837783,"score_spread":0.22792508367704803,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W306366585","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010295509,0.0098941075,0.0030238014,0.47865173,0.028702993,0.00019808025,0.0011074665,0.0005111834,0.46761513],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.06603457,0.0023049554,0.0027834163,0.46640494,0.004627135,0.00024193936,0.0006883997,0.00023820755,0.45667642],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9800417,0.0032136762,0.0012885234,0.0019311925,0.010973736,0.0025511866],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9774236,0.014983515,0.0007262008,0.0015093803,0.0042602033,0.0010970089],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011970643,0.0005472192,0.0008654518,0.0011719704,0.0062822495,0.0048143836,0.0023110183,0.029164173,0.02348162],"category_scores_gemma":[0.036206383,0.00072871294,0.0011337925,0.00079428335,0.0047283038,0.0029384422,0.0033471258,0.014434042,0.010802275],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00016676587,0.00008168805,0.0014073106,0.0001785741,0.000027590482,0.001544898,0.0016816458,0.00005431192,0.0023683175,0.2171149,0.7452573,0.030116698],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003546218,0.000037079866,0.0013027178,0.0001147851,0.000025889272,0.0004269142,0.00024301722,0.00004440808,0.0006608473,0.003953305,0.9931324,0.00002311996],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04063539,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.055131767,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04063539,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035592031,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008697284,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08079773},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3080640902","doi":"","title":"Share the Wealth? Kerr v Baranow and the \"Joint Family Venture\"","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian journal of family law","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Joint venture; Business; Joint (building); Business administration; Engineering; Structural engineering","score_opus":0.0658104394636366,"score_gpt":0.26196873119723174,"score_spread":0.19615829173359514,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3080640902","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12174105,0.004074922,0.0013315316,0.6433665,0.0018239261,0.00006100398,0.00012574969,0.000026252852,0.22744909],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7932053,0.0011851313,0.00026731603,0.15510526,0.0010257522,0.00007290837,0.000030562358,0.000028936933,0.04907883],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9956742,0.0013666939,0.000108638866,0.00041232994,0.0005661665,0.0018719888],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99481344,0.0025173626,0.00037616794,0.0003684193,0.00037308663,0.0015515106],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0065754745,0.00029476485,0.00070243445,0.0005243749,0.014594821,0.007472067,0.0019448875,0.027769541,0.008779316],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021328222,0.0005563083,0.0005801937,0.00064688944,0.012318747,0.008546342,0.0071454607,0.01684853,0.0006008381],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010116467,0.00013062087,0.0045182304,0.000026187454,0.000033280365,0.0014992806,0.008791175,0.0001739282,0.00022551899,0.85599333,0.11561236,0.012894886],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028722745,0.0001419313,0.00983596,0.00071243744,0.0001539278,0.0022368412,0.039051842,0.0010352192,0.0009483991,0.5005137,0.4448417,0.0002407759],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.085341774,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.17422387,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.085341774,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0050146007,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018111557,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16969007},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3082016325","doi":"","title":"With Great Advantage Should Come Responsibility: How the Territorialist Approach in Private International Law Maybe Overcome to Ensure Justice is Done for those Left in the Wake of Canadian Business Abroad","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Wake; Economic Justice; Political science; Business; Engineering","score_opus":0.036242820470721346,"score_gpt":0.32300708028986314,"score_spread":0.2867642598191418,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3082016325","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06596251,0.0072803753,0.010838389,0.3205195,0.0008949597,0.00007285327,0.00011290204,0.00012287455,0.59419566],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.91807157,0.0026549182,0.0036114564,0.014265794,0.0001041413,0.000024947902,0.000041681138,0.00010537451,0.061120126],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9954184,0.0016094234,0.000058128826,0.00037778015,0.0007845012,0.0017517139],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964855,0.00096688786,0.00011060697,0.0001895713,0.0013300822,0.0009173895],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0056800167,0.00032875972,0.0003362393,0.0011545533,0.02874257,0.017323239,0.002154364,0.005251311,0.0063752555],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008939839,0.00024135449,0.0004332962,0.0015714593,0.03987518,0.0066557126,0.0038343682,0.006021618,0.0005964786],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012330233,0.000013521464,0.0013058706,0.000027219143,0.00000766843,0.00019138162,0.031227157,0.0004085082,0.00010561468,0.9243507,0.027793033,0.014557033],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022642567,0.000025435082,0.0065642307,0.00052836526,0.00006795799,0.00022368542,0.13525556,0.002326007,0.00057023985,0.3754179,0.47889137,0.00010666902],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9513057,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9719648,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.086603835,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.086603835,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12742482,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.62835777},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3084677261","doi":"","title":"Research Guides: The Law of Canada: Case Law","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"libguides","venue":"","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.14241118086900328,"score_gpt":0.41229647680230685,"score_spread":0.26988529593330357,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3084677261","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0049600056,0.032185927,0.0031544734,0.073086046,0.0023090476,0.0011651402,0.019931763,0.0005250987,0.8626826],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.05417213,0.025525268,0.008929733,0.017435117,0.00077337655,0.0012337513,0.0062125246,0.00044639324,0.8852718],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99466234,0.0010309132,0.0004225587,0.00044638198,0.0026938925,0.0007439484],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98296607,0.0055675856,0.00044400385,0.00050363864,0.009504073,0.0010146069],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006045745,0.0009623143,0.0007513883,0.008307819,0.013497343,0.0121689895,0.0033116797,0.010517438,0.06776084],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023704452,0.001106934,0.0005042179,0.018299052,0.0060266485,0.004181684,0.0020130035,0.0048247282,0.007014509],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009779223,0.000028303759,0.0005018249,0.00024373864,0.0000031756663,0.0000647541,0.0018658759,0.0001866716,0.000043403463,0.11489312,0.861427,0.020732328],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012683052,0.000006122802,0.0029176418,0.00072787335,0.000010402432,0.00004172166,0.0034086916,0.00019284745,0.00011679936,0.013269283,0.9792563,0.00003970375],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9748566,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9899379,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07758834,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07758834,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.24560453,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5629455},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3084767512","doi":"10.1136/bmj.m3581","title":"Canadian court says wife cannot block husband’s medically assisted death","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"BMJ","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Wife; Block (permutation group theory); Medicine; Computer science; Law; Political science; Combinatorics; Mathematics","score_opus":0.049104593026200086,"score_gpt":0.325819374373972,"score_spread":0.27671478134777194,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3084767512","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.049479175,0.0045016212,0.0006087853,0.33639878,0.003456081,0.00014796623,0.000939252,0.000065556065,0.6044028],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4081269,0.0032490208,0.0007677,0.21134444,0.0005640807,0.000072168594,0.00032237385,0.0000347873,0.3755186],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978357,0.00016027388,0.00005404105,0.00018609018,0.0008608818,0.00090314855],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976579,0.0005547172,0.000066709785,0.00009163092,0.0009599044,0.00066914986],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013832208,0.00022195051,0.00027768366,0.0003895983,0.021119148,0.0028880688,0.0011327825,0.007207174,0.014206009],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0060926857,0.00047124064,0.0003543975,0.0004295775,0.0027597018,0.00077740115,0.0015773351,0.007125334,0.0012950345],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000058438396,0.000035998422,0.0086829495,0.0000642288,0.000023231978,0.0029102883,0.00830795,0.00017956125,0.0008528728,0.21600455,0.7467033,0.016176559],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000050331077,0.000030847943,0.008669265,0.00030037508,0.000037766833,0.0007960207,0.005797615,0.00037224544,0.00052367937,0.0055221966,0.9778276,0.00007209772],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9798621,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.993601,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027770571,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.027770571,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.10025972,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20149052},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W308696149","doi":"","title":"Challenge of Jurisdiction: Van Breda v. Village Resorts Ltd. and Black v. Breeden","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Plaintiff; Law; Subject-matter jurisdiction; Common law; Political science; Appeal; Discretion; Original jurisdiction","score_opus":0.01980215187143085,"score_gpt":0.26419970146889193,"score_spread":0.24439754959746107,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W308696149","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.29123244,0.0073503084,0.002931711,0.0705119,0.0005202217,0.00013661946,0.00053984416,0.000045376055,0.6267316],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9578837,0.0006459769,0.0005935627,0.007956024,0.000041041272,0.00003855438,0.000074952186,0.0000133273925,0.03275295],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.994719,0.0006443753,0.000089197485,0.00052478747,0.0022231964,0.0017994056],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976336,0.0007486065,0.0002070392,0.00011861502,0.00071554584,0.0005765102],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019470609,0.00027460282,0.00035576866,0.0011899224,0.0128938155,0.006363456,0.0021862928,0.0059034717,0.004129624],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008233917,0.0003028374,0.00051357184,0.001839962,0.014414302,0.0026517073,0.0041971146,0.005072971,0.0003092843],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000076621945,0.000021369691,0.005908273,0.0000672259,0.000023470217,0.0010389708,0.05622776,0.00020430764,0.0007480761,0.90464586,0.020323401,0.010714785],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002998554,0.00012084495,0.08183094,0.00083749124,0.00032887352,0.0015597435,0.124162525,0.0017649576,0.002975307,0.15775037,0.62797546,0.00039367052],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9630806,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98082435,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9630806,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.038323212,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.039661225,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27805567},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W309291630","doi":"","title":"Conflict of Laws Trends - Torts","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Institutional Repository at DePaul University (DePaul University)","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Conflict of laws; Law; Law and economics; Political science; Economics","score_opus":0.046433706895241886,"score_gpt":0.2495112546030284,"score_spread":0.20307754770778652,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W309291630","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010116523,0.0063170143,0.028351469,0.01732171,0.0009082193,0.00026976777,0.00041195797,0.00019751224,0.9361058],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6590688,0.008944207,0.014601066,0.020538736,0.0016507073,0.00062721514,0.0005662306,0.0001683052,0.29383475],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99037486,0.0026098983,0.0005734063,0.0012700465,0.0037450742,0.0014267395],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9937589,0.0029726555,0.0008183894,0.00091030204,0.0011613901,0.0003784041],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0072246366,0.00081509986,0.0007814394,0.0030099882,0.0055581923,0.008172663,0.0022252577,0.006287682,0.03080321],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012357964,0.0005181032,0.0010956962,0.0025698056,0.009062545,0.006706559,0.0055647953,0.0076429765,0.0034253774],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000045559627,0.000016052934,0.0005060328,0.000023305549,0.0000049034193,0.0002351031,0.0004298699,0.00014843204,0.00003187499,0.98168063,0.01010789,0.0068113836],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017278153,0.00004251927,0.0015582725,0.00045543798,0.000023174365,0.0027092134,0.0013523188,0.0017521223,0.00031908773,0.46741715,0.5243225,0.000030885793],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0043357406,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005899852,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03080321,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005143285,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038642867,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10304695},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3093419797","doi":"10.3917/rcdip.202.0215","title":"Le règlement 2019/1111, Bruxelles II : la protection des enfants gagne du ter(rain)","year":2020,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue critique de droit international privé","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Art; Philosophy","score_opus":0.023982317835573693,"score_gpt":0.2958343540158824,"score_spread":0.2718520361803087,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3093419797","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11289211,0.004957431,0.007307544,0.029252196,0.002810419,0.0007926633,0.0036115258,0.00039727712,0.8379787],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.28913534,0.0030213362,0.00587605,0.015250077,0.00036380359,0.00080803613,0.0021681245,0.00027237393,0.6831048],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99638236,0.0006070961,0.0001373774,0.00044832815,0.001118267,0.0013064481],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978618,0.00045862971,0.0002621459,0.00020957699,0.00064491085,0.0005629953],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038193043,0.00041179077,0.0002696786,0.00077362044,0.0035696747,0.004011707,0.0013502988,0.002619908,0.025129639],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006479411,0.0005161129,0.0005570159,0.0007671794,0.0018174257,0.0013057223,0.003428317,0.004596066,0.0063496227],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005480179,0.0002452515,0.032006096,0.0007148956,0.00005839587,0.001796944,0.03332297,0.0015037301,0.009613176,0.46298987,0.29815507,0.15904556],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021765247,0.0001064798,0.026369818,0.00044978823,0.000016027761,0.00021319969,0.0038717804,0.0001800508,0.0016102161,0.0026857853,0.9644323,0.000042806292],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.15305728,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.28726226,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15305728,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0070292074,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.021005318,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3043328},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3096476607","doi":"","title":"FACL Ontario Podcast: Race and Identity in the Law, Part 1","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Race (biology); Identity (music); Sociology; Gender studies; Law; Political science; Genealogy; History; Art","score_opus":0.03004997721602811,"score_gpt":0.2959063701529974,"score_spread":0.26585639293696933,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3096476607","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0045716194,0.031901393,0.00068040966,0.2008916,0.014400695,0.00042802788,0.032549553,0.00042006542,0.7141566],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.026095744,0.014547071,0.0005838743,0.010575482,0.005349902,0.00017436827,0.004103589,0.00018593029,0.93838406],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976441,0.00021039628,0.00006784376,0.00013568887,0.0014503582,0.00049166294],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99553853,0.0008324407,0.00022017477,0.00023258527,0.0017901832,0.001386113],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002311212,0.000711571,0.0007190014,0.003414484,0.013377108,0.008256509,0.0024284835,0.007369487,0.15733813],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006563814,0.0007675549,0.00051050505,0.006028211,0.003298907,0.0028630705,0.0030094506,0.0039130724,0.014597051],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007504214,0.000018668363,0.00048250266,0.00004657036,0.0000018837429,0.000021499924,0.00015994714,0.000057535573,0.000017928774,0.005369172,0.98692954,0.0068872496],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012430379,0.0000045502206,0.004994908,0.00020358387,0.0000055599785,0.000010640331,0.0006435879,0.00009790509,0.000042909745,0.0014907703,0.9924793,0.0000137674715],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9554968,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9901371,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9554968,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06117474,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09881683,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5263485},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3099391973","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198850397.001.0001","title":"Comparative Succession Law","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Estate; Law; Civil law (Civil law); Entitlement (fair division); Common law; Comparative law; Family law; Political science; Statutory law; Public law; Economics","score_opus":0.06290376510184068,"score_gpt":0.35612895398715216,"score_spread":0.29322518888531146,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3099391973","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0028135167,0.0042308373,0.0010909114,0.004210223,0.0006082458,0.000014589435,0.000059312082,0.000017725251,0.98695475],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3791552,0.0058842343,0.0013204265,0.004296684,0.0014626847,0.00009752584,0.00031267462,0.000079543104,0.60739106],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984493,0.0005958985,0.000049148362,0.00023179506,0.00041932875,0.0002544795],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991744,0.0002712271,0.000049192637,0.00011322624,0.00029469345,0.00009728575],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014465703,0.00031782617,0.000295659,0.0015119157,0.0046632565,0.0043847985,0.0008741228,0.0014559334,0.055441104],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003874787,0.00018615244,0.00033107246,0.001144633,0.005118843,0.0037192763,0.0024976009,0.0027854815,0.0049815015],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008574968,0.000010687118,0.00009939101,0.000020502826,0.0000010396318,0.000043792326,0.00053346925,0.00007077892,0.000027531743,0.96295244,0.029051408,0.007180452],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000088990755,0.000017923987,0.00045573112,0.00022329378,0.0000027529088,0.00013934483,0.00090890465,0.00019166897,0.000104749946,0.18678579,0.8111559,0.000005066263],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0061786906,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005827196,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.055441104,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00671921,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024366053,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18546897},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W310650258","doi":"","title":"Intellectual Property Litigation in Australia","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Defense Counsel Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Jurisdiction; Intellectual property; Common law; Jurisprudence; Political science","score_opus":0.08291134681595079,"score_gpt":0.32407302064554006,"score_spread":0.24116167382958925,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W310650258","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20436028,0.052087776,0.0055312407,0.0651587,0.0011763412,0.00035281418,0.00019140347,0.00014662319,0.67099494],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7924417,0.034648374,0.0034598713,0.03152809,0.0010325909,0.00023049723,0.00018890301,0.000048392543,0.13642162],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9952825,0.0008857016,0.00030960565,0.00047906017,0.0022247613,0.0008184506],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996221,0.0015911891,0.0006668337,0.0001694606,0.00092680915,0.00042470652],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032700202,0.0002154626,0.00031611486,0.0035517463,0.0084416745,0.007860625,0.0011459106,0.0066381595,0.00828463],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008407947,0.00033139362,0.0006813779,0.003694376,0.004977209,0.004457537,0.0060481383,0.0041793296,0.00085057784],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031993837,0.00017051937,0.007943633,0.00057875016,0.000036898997,0.0074495,0.028926412,0.0011976137,0.0013165441,0.7571661,0.046360504,0.14882155],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019922698,0.00016383566,0.03346692,0.0011445789,0.000049744438,0.0054280558,0.007647723,0.0027732633,0.0009000441,0.08758478,0.8607539,0.000067240515],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04026842,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.036305945,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04026842,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0136817675,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012636647,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.099268675},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3108699951","doi":"","title":"Facilitating Money Judgment Enforcement Between Canada and the United States","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Enforcement; Commission; Jurisdiction; Conflict of laws; Law; Statute; Convention; Political science; Treaty; Negotiation; Business; State (computer science); Personal jurisdiction; Choice of law","score_opus":0.024497266980014486,"score_gpt":0.2634825255529577,"score_spread":0.23898525857294323,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3108699951","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18850373,0.0020226398,0.011448041,0.06467473,0.001058277,0.00067538454,0.00020324044,0.00033839166,0.73107564],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90761757,0.0010086711,0.0073549906,0.017094582,0.0001636348,0.00020487013,0.00012639086,0.00009699721,0.06633239],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.96659297,0.0055922256,0.0008155203,0.0023568457,0.0123657165,0.01227669],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96999913,0.008744757,0.0011535011,0.0015812939,0.011791149,0.00673003],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.021282371,0.00037627685,0.00058702886,0.0034145487,0.0441799,0.016996006,0.003962492,0.004103394,0.010834662],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04755825,0.00076849724,0.0005391941,0.003079977,0.010079481,0.004341755,0.012966613,0.007217516,0.0009966717],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014424839,0.0002584387,0.018530378,0.00010903258,0.00005753564,0.0029007955,0.06604259,0.0021369217,0.001958448,0.6529126,0.14495312,0.109995954],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011494244,0.00009946263,0.03364751,0.0006757952,0.00010706123,0.00035742795,0.092793584,0.005365924,0.0023437818,0.037343264,0.8268217,0.00032968342],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9784934,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9908614,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1330269,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1330269,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.36993873,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9651822},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3112206666","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198799986.013.17","title":"Diffusion, Reception, and Transplantation","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"reference-entry","venue":"","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Process (computing); Field (mathematics); Political science; Reflection (computer programming); Transplantation; Law and economics; Sociology; Engineering ethics; Computer science; Engineering; Medicine","score_opus":0.029354913957907118,"score_gpt":0.2974978804223531,"score_spread":0.26814296646444596,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3112206666","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08067248,0.0055334168,0.035292286,0.02956622,0.00048345336,0.00013319461,0.0000637891,0.00012831783,0.8481268],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96369505,0.0019022971,0.0033344752,0.0012714604,0.00022488761,0.00009626183,0.000041199717,0.00006638339,0.029367926],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9927234,0.0034707552,0.00021572554,0.00085827085,0.0017327598,0.0009990238],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99440056,0.0032036302,0.0006509416,0.0006472251,0.00059162546,0.00050599413],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0082340995,0.00040414365,0.00065509387,0.0024217512,0.005607191,0.012592749,0.0015646443,0.0035811823,0.014926374],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017295271,0.00030226193,0.0006360654,0.0024273123,0.028150821,0.019103117,0.010374176,0.0045771655,0.0012541972],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011769559,0.00001289314,0.0003960638,0.000031833773,0.0000023030793,0.000052102958,0.005440088,0.00015623235,0.00013956298,0.98366934,0.0007756857,0.009312153],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026010475,0.00007816419,0.0017390192,0.00033298475,0.0000125454635,0.0003733524,0.014307287,0.0010522251,0.00049940834,0.8484774,0.1330746,0.000026996853],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0028874304,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017156352,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014926374,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007174341,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00451491,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05205375},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3112238147","doi":"","title":"Guides: Quebec Law: Ressources par domaine de droit","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"libguides","venue":"","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law","score_opus":0.019052418890344553,"score_gpt":0.2850354195976615,"score_spread":0.26598300070731695,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3112238147","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0070848535,0.015567631,0.0020158465,0.033028685,0.0026100518,0.00077895523,0.050613537,0.0013151027,0.88698536],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.011239426,0.0023272536,0.0011259756,0.0023235478,0.00013992634,0.00021536645,0.003870291,0.00020642218,0.9785517],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976605,0.00025032694,0.00014585728,0.00022077857,0.0012692893,0.00045324373],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953827,0.0007064201,0.00016705072,0.00020955053,0.0031611086,0.00037311416],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025138478,0.0011647636,0.00076866127,0.004374338,0.00792361,0.007906476,0.0024321089,0.008150202,0.19783269],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008319617,0.0010360256,0.00076250924,0.006921531,0.0020070786,0.0023218102,0.0013668479,0.0046439236,0.020957386],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015787988,0.000032123226,0.00067407195,0.00008941059,0.0000048636753,0.00007063858,0.00043040188,0.00016466026,0.00008409903,0.028852075,0.9544205,0.015161305],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016739852,0.000006873102,0.005548408,0.00020055982,0.00000589147,0.000040067844,0.00044384232,0.00021528239,0.000108234875,0.0011496496,0.99223375,0.000030715135],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9878935,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9915651,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19783269,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.057629816,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.11242511,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.66181624},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3113891289","doi":"10.5937/gakv0404106k","title":"Regulatory activities of the European Union and other states in the international community: The tripartite relationship in the field of private international law","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Glasnik Advokatske komore Vojvodine","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Atomic Energy (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"European union; Law; Political science; European Union law; International law; Conflict of laws; Private law; Legislation; Sources of law; Common law; Public law; Normative; Business; International trade","score_opus":0.02795281383796602,"score_gpt":0.304417219093294,"score_spread":0.276464405255328,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3113891289","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.21108557,0.00859195,0.053562365,0.03624977,0.00025081044,0.00022420376,0.00005660947,0.00006728429,0.6899114],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98765343,0.0008852084,0.0034474903,0.0012359278,0.000050756218,0.0001059949,0.00001161915,0.0000119572,0.006597574],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9709038,0.022213537,0.00063146313,0.0011257654,0.0033409654,0.0017844125],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98098844,0.013225325,0.0015576035,0.0011705648,0.0016517229,0.0014063839],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01883023,0.00018015146,0.00037692918,0.0033790653,0.0070923446,0.013549494,0.0014465792,0.004278501,0.0032647795],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019152643,0.0004485225,0.00042973846,0.003917742,0.026600577,0.009790086,0.009761279,0.0037235513,0.0003108416],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005283341,0.000010248698,0.00036147583,0.000013866461,0.0000034067243,0.000036525384,0.010429246,0.00010681741,0.00009599307,0.98398733,0.00035470608,0.004595168],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022061406,0.00006471716,0.0036745875,0.0003408045,0.00002148393,0.00021041355,0.032637294,0.0013109613,0.0003872213,0.8702122,0.09107665,0.000041621395],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004401803,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00496595,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01883023,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0053230072,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007069995,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09958494},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3117032328","doi":"","title":"LA COMPÉTENCE INTERNATIONALE INDIRECTE ET LA SOUMISSION AU TRIBUNAL ÉTRANGER SELON LA COUR SUPRÊME DU CANADA APRÈS L’ARRÊT BARER C KNIGHT BROTHERS","year":2019,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"CONTEST; Tribunal; Jurisdiction; Supreme court; Law; Plaintiff; Political science; Humanities; Knight; Philosophy","score_opus":0.022042963572016495,"score_gpt":0.2678361889028034,"score_spread":0.24579322533078693,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3117032328","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021268276,0.081168115,0.0033795245,0.1437501,0.0038310536,0.00008484588,0.00022919882,0.000080617196,0.7462083],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.51157135,0.01932362,0.0030759035,0.023491783,0.001422919,0.00008415888,0.000118565156,0.00007987472,0.44083184],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99234664,0.0011349776,0.0002327594,0.00071714155,0.0034797268,0.0020887344],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953393,0.0016327592,0.0002282007,0.00022689822,0.0019726811,0.0006001873],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005550862,0.00049580575,0.00060708827,0.0017598289,0.010342442,0.014101603,0.0013094884,0.006060951,0.00901768],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0092402,0.00043732548,0.00060357276,0.0015228239,0.009218124,0.0027575884,0.0022167386,0.0076101357,0.0008523648],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015368738,0.0000113399365,0.0009339211,0.00007113131,0.000010692418,0.00021468963,0.0027966155,0.00015778883,0.00024458097,0.9154145,0.063828155,0.016301293],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013482226,0.000019217596,0.004815466,0.0003317499,0.000021178623,0.00012993267,0.0020017175,0.0002160063,0.00039859393,0.022698931,0.96930885,0.00004498093],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.92244583,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9519273,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07755417,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.040391766,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07917225,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29306412},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3117068828","doi":"10.31436/iiumlj.v28i2.575","title":"DETERMINATION OF A CHILD’S HABITUAL RESIDENCE IN INTERNATIONAL CHILD ABDUCTION CASES: CHARTING THE WAY TOWARDS HARMONIZATION","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"IIUM Law Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Residence; Harmonization; Convention; Law; European union; Convention on the Rights of the Child; Political science; Jurisprudence; Psychology; Sociology; Business; Human rights; International trade; Demography","score_opus":0.02993824471647548,"score_gpt":0.30355966327036743,"score_spread":0.27362141855389194,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3117068828","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.50384504,0.0045387344,0.027362963,0.01850946,0.00016780791,0.00015648668,0.000047668967,0.000051064388,0.44532076],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9925897,0.00054949726,0.0025244162,0.0012531818,0.000041430907,0.00004899328,0.000015545424,0.0000132405985,0.002963958],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9846383,0.008478758,0.0012964127,0.0012734322,0.002434488,0.0018785194],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9867166,0.007891962,0.0019808826,0.0013101167,0.0014957223,0.00060462044],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013797856,0.00015478462,0.0003808164,0.0017066541,0.0053763534,0.008586804,0.001835762,0.0035551921,0.0010389314],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023256922,0.00035508774,0.0003482201,0.0019312358,0.028563105,0.005310495,0.009991042,0.0055873226,0.00013581963],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015248067,0.000012878042,0.004805438,0.000028843451,0.000004187811,0.00064949994,0.034152683,0.00028764794,0.00034812206,0.94584334,0.0010809138,0.012771253],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000633091,0.00035818847,0.058490016,0.0019680576,0.00009778955,0.00432613,0.14869262,0.004162216,0.008441032,0.51413524,0.25896665,0.00029869511],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015578914,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.029353818,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015578914,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0075960755,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009793207,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07297087},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3118179374","doi":"10.25313/2520-2308-2020-11-6521","title":"INHERITANCE BY CONTRACT IN PRIVATE INTERNATION LAW","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International scientific journal Internauka Series Juridical Sciences","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Inheritance (genetic algorithm); Statute; Legislature; Conflict of laws; Law; Element (criminal law); Political science; Property (philosophy); Law and economics; Private law; Estate; Sociology; Comparative law; Epistemology; Biology","score_opus":0.03258722145211966,"score_gpt":0.3618706701168974,"score_spread":0.3292834486647777,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3118179374","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0675931,0.010976267,0.10795185,0.024935935,0.0005838578,0.00014069914,0.00017765812,0.00010930585,0.78753126],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9431237,0.0031745385,0.012062434,0.002532758,0.0006051613,0.00015834722,0.000076819,0.000047286794,0.038218822],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9940205,0.0021660244,0.00030543673,0.0007841493,0.0020248892,0.000698909],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99649614,0.0020451734,0.0003852836,0.00050902413,0.00042117044,0.00014327443],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0049000154,0.0002525036,0.00044130132,0.0011136088,0.0038893358,0.005739363,0.0010590233,0.0038853127,0.0039592492],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0060189012,0.0003447158,0.0006984044,0.0019686008,0.017173111,0.006546623,0.0026900647,0.0040127663,0.000518201],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[8.8703626e-7,0.000002009407,0.00004819372,0.0000038028265,6.448109e-7,0.000021723046,0.00015882004,0.000092327304,0.000010174874,0.99873537,0.00027033288,0.0006556655],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007779243,0.000009209174,0.00024530588,0.000048855083,0.0000047017156,0.00007417284,0.00014000213,0.0014376718,0.000071325885,0.9680406,0.029912783,0.0000075666753],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015056101,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0067843744,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015056101,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008236916,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005558893,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.059763253},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3118739551","doi":"","title":"The \"Family\"—and \"Families\" in Law: A Review of Archana Parashar and Franscesca Dominello, The Family In Law","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Canadian journal of family law","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Family law; Law; Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.0634057558751246,"score_gpt":0.3427713802528224,"score_spread":0.2793656243776978,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3118739551","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000030780044,0.9984079,0.000017176482,0.001222523,0.00015429466,0.0000012835565,0.0000050097565,4.29167e-7,0.00016067241],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0008489285,0.9975217,0.000067656016,0.0011992449,0.0002601033,0.000004661916,0.000007016455,0.0000010181499,0.000089677036],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99784243,0.0008823239,0.00030859033,0.0002370681,0.0006136088,0.00011606742],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9885748,0.009260797,0.000527486,0.00011439942,0.0012230036,0.0002994615],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0050839987,0.0010124139,0.002192541,0.009139156,0.0015782282,0.004578876,0.0012408934,0.004678493,0.0035028209],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010985922,0.0006488622,0.00075548014,0.013863447,0.0047974656,0.0067637097,0.0028651063,0.0040157824,0.00045360063],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000090740745,0.00010198063,0.0012827213,0.07814125,0.0003213224,0.0002661732,0.003879527,0.00025903492,0.0001834533,0.06201448,0.13934019,0.7141191],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023010596,0.000035126075,0.0031583107,0.10349325,0.00028677064,0.00059763406,0.002738327,0.000053480526,0.00005741006,0.009672517,0.8798433,0.000040812138],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03196209,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.092083,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03196209,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005224508,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01869737,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06355214},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3118831414","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3753032","title":"First Comes Marriage, Then Comes Baby, Then Comes What Exactly?","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Legalization; Repeal; Political science; Population; Decriminalization; Adultery; Law; Sociology; Gender studies","score_opus":0.02039003108676344,"score_gpt":0.2750722255484602,"score_spread":0.25468219446169676,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3118831414","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06019398,0.0041779703,0.0034447047,0.5010358,0.004128701,0.000047836846,0.00052350014,0.000051207237,0.4263963],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8326623,0.0025791323,0.0016484887,0.06330098,0.0006850556,0.00005790184,0.00017163785,0.000093273564,0.098801196],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99507,0.0024882867,0.00011217122,0.00043163533,0.00061826815,0.0012796222],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959925,0.0014405462,0.00036686836,0.00020627465,0.00078463036,0.0012093063],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004883067,0.00011381288,0.0004405544,0.00044732462,0.009002778,0.005795046,0.0009794594,0.0040912316,0.030930774],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017896237,0.00028685434,0.00025467647,0.00071019575,0.006884312,0.0054562856,0.002431365,0.0069047995,0.0047600833],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023797464,0.000040997886,0.0059611,0.000039271436,0.0000125574725,0.0003903785,0.013488979,0.000035364,0.00014322106,0.893073,0.0651216,0.021669708],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022031367,0.00007535707,0.008208554,0.00056875864,0.000023568206,0.0010132592,0.0861371,0.00021345378,0.00064042147,0.2718194,0.6312187,0.00005938487],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023746321,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04172355,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030930774,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030483755,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009559417,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10347378},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3120180655","doi":"","title":"로마법상 uti possidetis 법리의 근대 국제법에서의 원용 :민족자결 원칙과의 경합을 중심으로","year":2017,"lang":"ko","type":"article","venue":"한양법학","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Doctrine; Adjudication; Secession; Political science; Law; Context (archaeology); Frontier; International law; Independence (probability theory); Comparative law; Geography","score_opus":0.04045460487685131,"score_gpt":0.3535061560512428,"score_spread":0.3130515511743915,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3120180655","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.082332194,0.005395179,0.03190783,0.014405177,0.0005657071,0.00008418463,0.00011332525,0.0001046605,0.8650917],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9567656,0.0010626931,0.0047470382,0.0012672889,0.00026581835,0.00007791217,0.000035615387,0.000025433756,0.035752464],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99743915,0.00084059016,0.00014461973,0.00046518916,0.0007606421,0.00034983363],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975647,0.0012292799,0.0003353136,0.00037846674,0.000391458,0.00010070447],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031966495,0.00024789094,0.00033548396,0.0010011108,0.0062020826,0.005765681,0.00081461726,0.0019211153,0.0040271957],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0057364656,0.0002892651,0.0003465001,0.0009638035,0.02069084,0.00441543,0.0032133975,0.0038605477,0.00083583384],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004709793,0.0000040504183,0.00033189004,0.000019624773,0.0000011924927,0.000049000842,0.0041057765,0.00002590559,0.00010994593,0.9891801,0.0008708723,0.005296888],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016936889,0.00007111722,0.003757323,0.0003835303,0.000014518962,0.0012971025,0.007474154,0.0006925603,0.001951971,0.44021702,0.54407483,0.000048921007],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036841754,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0068811607,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0062020826,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030152604,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030185664,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.021877408},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3120281924","doi":"10.2307/j.ctv1d5nkwc.8","title":"Canada and Cross-Cumulation in Rules of Origin","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of Ottawa Press eBooks","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rules of origin; Economics; International economics","score_opus":0.02933597654221995,"score_gpt":0.25910012048431846,"score_spread":0.22976414394209851,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3120281924","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009698441,0.008852952,0.0021112529,0.005491211,0.0002130311,0.00003188023,0.00020989023,0.00003172537,0.97335964],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6727565,0.009891344,0.0025810634,0.0015567638,0.00014077574,0.00009237909,0.00019503754,0.00013324311,0.31265298],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970686,0.000519353,0.00009246543,0.00038448532,0.0008351644,0.0011000709],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99689436,0.001160839,0.00013219037,0.0003068171,0.0011450979,0.00036065798],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001708596,0.0005227049,0.0009313293,0.0027749094,0.015416517,0.0144232875,0.0019947526,0.0029231873,0.02173157],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007728978,0.0007107127,0.00044464396,0.0068484982,0.01540528,0.0042805877,0.0029264148,0.0051630703,0.0011869932],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000040072255,0.000002932613,0.00013729343,0.000009903027,0.0000022297208,0.000022856459,0.0012965543,0.00017027963,0.000007787955,0.9878612,0.0069910088,0.0034939863],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021841774,0.000009781426,0.0028759209,0.00030474341,0.000029999006,0.000107247746,0.006080277,0.00096760667,0.00012360762,0.48686558,0.50255424,0.000059050904],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9577014,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9754402,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07965981,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07965981,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07545704,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5779751},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121164040","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3046777","title":"Has the CJPTA Readied Canada for the Hague Choice of Court Convention?","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Convention; Political science","score_opus":0.03748253400218303,"score_gpt":0.3245374225245528,"score_spread":0.28705488852236977,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121164040","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008610597,0.00370021,0.0006541644,0.77781034,0.009162409,0.000054384534,0.00070359657,0.000091643364,0.19921272],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.14292437,0.002522977,0.0014649602,0.5407593,0.002171135,0.00008503735,0.0003349078,0.00031057856,0.3094267],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9725362,0.0021549254,0.00086190226,0.0020427937,0.010151678,0.012252632],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96430415,0.0060852496,0.001107706,0.001397858,0.019883608,0.0072214594],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01800041,0.00041050577,0.0014199263,0.0025338398,0.030341066,0.028371895,0.0061335936,0.035618283,0.053767614],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06533123,0.00092135195,0.0012906294,0.0044270037,0.010230986,0.008841553,0.0040876116,0.02625268,0.0076854727],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005571828,0.00005152754,0.0027510398,0.00007359219,0.000049524926,0.0003097589,0.0022504763,0.0001116926,0.00019043885,0.31069502,0.6708639,0.012597317],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002858763,0.000011138252,0.0034079216,0.00026498493,0.00003932989,0.00009773711,0.00528536,0.00018289586,0.0002992824,0.013589851,0.97663337,0.00015939548],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.94068223,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9710476,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06593612,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06593612,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.2321597,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47840226},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121191412","doi":"","title":"Family and Legal Succession in Romania - A Conclusion","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Romanian; Civil code; Stress (linguistics); Scope (computer science); Order (exchange); Law; Political science; Subject (documents); State (computer science); Code (set theory); Family law; Civil law (Civil law); Civil procedure; Legal history; Sociology; Set (abstract data type); Public law; Linguistics; Computer science; Business; Philosophy","score_opus":0.011707355357134429,"score_gpt":0.31185194206437894,"score_spread":0.30014458670724453,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121191412","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.92079306,0.01924336,0.0004988005,0.006597951,0.00011958476,0.000032769254,0.00012309379,0.0000064727974,0.05258492],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9959512,0.001958697,0.00012897539,0.00030131068,0.00002189252,0.000008940354,0.000025456657,0.0000040779887,0.0015994816],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99776804,0.001211185,0.00012962265,0.00023958889,0.00022188631,0.00042973066],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982004,0.000857117,0.00030366244,0.00012783306,0.00030452985,0.0002064356],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031961575,0.00019196447,0.0004280193,0.0019035366,0.0033767521,0.0034584403,0.00047084616,0.0005552917,0.003493194],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005918695,0.00026697604,0.00023204897,0.0030574591,0.005923725,0.0038615344,0.0034170176,0.0011483774,0.00020221135],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00032464362,0.00015688967,0.1375978,0.00078367,0.00003576334,0.0028982123,0.48224676,0.00053146714,0.0010771975,0.25832152,0.004362286,0.11166375],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021429483,0.0001404807,0.29249564,0.0020483716,0.000020661548,0.0013749507,0.5552357,0.00035531603,0.0007151951,0.014178965,0.13334931,0.00006404181],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018191077,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.026263976,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018191077,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0057176873,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003940124,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.041484892},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121356489","doi":"","title":"The Payoffs and Pitfalls of Laws that Encourage Shared Parenting: Lessons from the Australian Experience","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Law; Family law; Legislature; Population; Political science; Argument (complex analysis); Common law; Sociology; Medicine","score_opus":0.02804136045200981,"score_gpt":0.31121835898828426,"score_spread":0.2831769985362744,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121356489","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.38783705,0.027048124,0.004806539,0.34000903,0.00222266,0.00018374373,0.00007977396,0.00007895156,0.23773421],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8994347,0.020946335,0.0034844643,0.02968947,0.0005272774,0.0001588633,0.00003202674,0.000102588434,0.045624267],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9767994,0.016334543,0.00052525906,0.0007719874,0.003100739,0.002467981],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98257715,0.011488585,0.000956542,0.0006232953,0.0018330354,0.0025214674],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.022905575,0.0004063507,0.00055763766,0.0009012492,0.013523756,0.0065421187,0.0025908859,0.0052157594,0.0058454424],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03196532,0.00059536396,0.00048408477,0.0015783431,0.014888694,0.008289913,0.008517176,0.009334326,0.00066552375],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018987788,0.00013269912,0.0015786848,0.00027130762,0.000006813196,0.0019449347,0.87041,0.00011018122,0.0001650351,0.060308382,0.014971653,0.050081324],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015235564,0.00021257643,0.011397721,0.0025650333,0.000020671989,0.0012447055,0.49809837,0.0004067669,0.00037576904,0.026319256,0.4592714,0.00007250965],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08990407,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1480868,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08990407,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0111044105,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014531222,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17876154},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121549881","doi":"","title":"Copyrights, Federalism, and the Constitutionality of Canada's Private Copying Levy","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionality; Copying; Federalism; Political science; Law and economics; Law; Business; Economics; Supreme court","score_opus":0.010743120386991588,"score_gpt":0.24142404904333215,"score_spread":0.23068092865634054,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121549881","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12060879,0.003442377,0.0029247412,0.083966516,0.00033810985,0.00012914345,0.0009366413,0.0001403341,0.7875132],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9334317,0.0010344597,0.0011409804,0.0083833365,0.00024053034,0.00008813421,0.00012405196,0.000060243423,0.05549649],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98962224,0.0009415536,0.00029100096,0.000961814,0.003866504,0.004316883],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9810612,0.009472025,0.0007745411,0.0013324786,0.005244525,0.0021151153],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0069574346,0.00041557438,0.0011226438,0.002767109,0.023235144,0.01809648,0.0033415346,0.011995449,0.015128539],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03002274,0.0008576689,0.0008673349,0.0034546626,0.022509305,0.005068809,0.003429314,0.009683148,0.0005132131],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022860164,0.000017036613,0.00081136654,0.000014211672,0.000010832146,0.00004638187,0.0007688874,0.0004643346,0.00008136865,0.9855774,0.009336207,0.0028490962],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00020918636,0.000040711733,0.01473191,0.0003408001,0.00019117954,0.000092147704,0.0035686926,0.0049091056,0.00087432226,0.74066645,0.23411079,0.00026469468],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9774754,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98496115,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.100379385,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.100379385,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.16084215,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.72830683},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121595799","doi":"","title":"Single Family For Sale - 2962 Admiral Court- Coquitlam- British Columbia - Price $1,388,000","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"History; Medicine; Ancient history","score_opus":0.04092890737974705,"score_gpt":0.3121311125659624,"score_spread":0.27120220518621535,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121595799","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005564004,0.00067633315,0.00032326675,0.002712504,0.0010311855,0.00024830582,0.0043855067,0.00064728834,0.98441154],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0029182734,0.00009073747,0.00005545094,0.00016832714,0.00001682574,0.0000109410985,0.0004113455,0.000053057844,0.99627507],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99947757,0.000032151762,0.000013814645,0.000087407396,0.00019074276,0.00019832312],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99814403,0.00007464652,0.000024807172,0.000065624066,0.00065151986,0.0010394114],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00037098062,0.0009079345,0.0007600692,0.0009317603,0.008886394,0.0036933005,0.0015279687,0.0022068606,0.8466037],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013860804,0.0008419525,0.00048034574,0.00095829275,0.0007819802,0.00090757693,0.0021931827,0.0023198712,0.53735334],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001166567,0.000075841584,0.0013299364,0.000046243127,0.0000060359453,0.00016326836,0.0000951546,0.000085296604,0.000518321,0.00052847614,0.9654107,0.031624053],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000078335645,0.00007982387,0.017183943,0.00014649898,0.000013001507,0.0001906113,0.0020261174,0.00026915647,0.00023083223,0.00022663474,0.97952455,0.000030449533],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.72099084,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9457673,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.72099084,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0057266345,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011717722,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.56130457},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121730844","doi":"","title":"Forum-Selection Clauses: Beyond the Contracting Parties","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University; Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Selection (genetic algorithm); Test (biology); Database transaction; Political science; Forum shopping; Law; Law and economics; Business; Economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.023693000752775563,"score_gpt":0.30516055780784124,"score_spread":0.28146755705506565,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121730844","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17424989,0.0027466984,0.041410554,0.019969415,0.0002712372,0.0003041588,0.00032929372,0.00006332401,0.7606554],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96703064,0.0006703591,0.004044198,0.0038537341,0.00012273471,0.00008779942,0.00008546866,0.000026009156,0.024079077],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98888284,0.0019244965,0.0002770276,0.0012901921,0.0037350752,0.0038903735],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9937962,0.0031709424,0.00059430086,0.00055449747,0.0012292053,0.00065485446],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007440892,0.00042265188,0.0006555298,0.0016720799,0.01064604,0.007682749,0.0023404963,0.004511628,0.012622958],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011901736,0.00028167776,0.00091650797,0.002600756,0.014381295,0.006912023,0.0039819637,0.006289476,0.0005937424],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023114251,0.000008362315,0.0016433886,0.000023618157,0.000008577718,0.0002703022,0.0038992285,0.00016198924,0.00020182048,0.9851907,0.0016691919,0.0068996083],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012944113,0.0001413311,0.021388398,0.00077741296,0.00018530307,0.00066342024,0.0270978,0.002545348,0.0024473504,0.7171082,0.22739416,0.00012178704],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.24428172,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3940214,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24428172,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012488612,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.022916172,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.48571968},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3121759858","doi":"10.22329/wyaj.v28i2.4497","title":"Transnational and Comparative Administrative Law: Papers from the Sixth Administrative Law Discussion Forum, Québec City","year":2010,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"Scholarship at UWindsor (University of Windsor)","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor; Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Windsor; Administrative law; Law; Political science; Comparative law; Sociology","score_opus":0.05851439177848305,"score_gpt":0.2978660881579995,"score_spread":0.23935169637951642,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3121759858","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0883486,0.040888768,0.00038141356,0.6906611,0.009825829,0.0002840443,0.0061032977,0.000086672,0.1634203],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.51702476,0.02066995,0.0007396934,0.053601183,0.0032356859,0.00084236794,0.0036384063,0.00028692614,0.399961],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99344444,0.0014529775,0.0001430254,0.0005209524,0.0018606726,0.002577939],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9805681,0.005147369,0.0007611873,0.00058247347,0.006602556,0.006338269],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01279968,0.0007434474,0.0012009307,0.0035740377,0.048700906,0.017977344,0.0037616987,0.010645292,0.040476836],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015328549,0.0007869093,0.0006011322,0.009147814,0.00776541,0.005269023,0.005118649,0.008237044,0.0022146325],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018344949,0.00024649574,0.0052461233,0.00022106442,0.00003153244,0.00038049754,0.05510557,0.00019254368,0.00030410715,0.02549976,0.89514595,0.01744298],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006786935,0.000023137696,0.029012214,0.00068472564,0.000020703976,0.000031584546,0.07926351,0.00017634567,0.00019530857,0.0013333453,0.88909453,0.00009676076],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97695506,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9927987,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15851627,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.15851627,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.15000108,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97600186},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122564250","doi":"","title":"A Comparative Study of the Law of Palliative Care and End-of-Life Treatment","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Palliative care; Common law; End-of-life care; Law; Civil law (Civil law); Comparative law; Palliative treatment; Political science; Medicine; Public law; Nursing","score_opus":0.03555414244016503,"score_gpt":0.33989763476743656,"score_spread":0.30434349232727154,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122564250","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9225348,0.009147769,0.00045557006,0.0034724807,0.00009098732,0.000059353337,0.00007037656,0.000002216224,0.064166486],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965461,0.0020218082,0.0001380496,0.0004040101,0.000024260122,0.000025096024,0.00003460026,0.0000027454885,0.00080339715],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98997587,0.0073152753,0.0002990286,0.0002734547,0.0013620029,0.00077432557],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9520835,0.03703307,0.0050085266,0.0007937108,0.003780104,0.0013010873],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0071663363,0.000094548224,0.00041592948,0.0030868,0.0022086315,0.0027391647,0.00053787563,0.00088364055,0.002534189],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05311751,0.00017732751,0.00023188464,0.0054282565,0.006789131,0.0037202344,0.002560268,0.0014799879,0.00008599467],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00078116223,0.00091383624,0.21232888,0.0010368007,0.00023204969,0.0021739572,0.16266306,0.0013245146,0.00040736783,0.51956254,0.0056926915,0.0928831],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002842117,0.001065897,0.6207693,0.0015401404,0.00016228818,0.0013599652,0.28601426,0.0009528742,0.00042320593,0.0160057,0.071359575,0.00006252175],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.044335436,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0782324,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.044335436,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007213984,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005761336,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08815473},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3122860694","doi":"","title":"International Law in Domestic Courts: A Conflict of Laws Approach","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Conflict of laws; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Economics","score_opus":0.025003570827611708,"score_gpt":0.3085897903037968,"score_spread":0.28358621947618506,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3122860694","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012099051,0.03342825,0.059326194,0.08841541,0.0012075092,0.00007127365,0.00008305347,0.000056996905,0.8053122],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.90660673,0.01726302,0.014999987,0.024512028,0.0029203515,0.0002735126,0.00010853371,0.00010649134,0.03320946],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9833816,0.010688064,0.0005529586,0.0010927757,0.003038086,0.0012464512],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98893553,0.007578371,0.00088750117,0.00077896914,0.0011534463,0.00066619617],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009209191,0.00042986954,0.00081250595,0.0040610977,0.00656787,0.013496923,0.0026243874,0.008920211,0.007197589],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01607263,0.00038589138,0.000678344,0.0045260806,0.030876888,0.01827142,0.006519558,0.01062613,0.00083594414],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[3.5765515e-7,0.0000018951977,0.000026769083,0.000003965587,3.9952246e-7,0.000012296591,0.00041180468,0.000035732042,0.0000027869585,0.9983193,0.0005990749,0.00058561156],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003324223,0.000006793914,0.00013533486,0.00014560718,0.0000035059734,0.00008258713,0.0013006831,0.00048143714,0.000037004174,0.928531,0.06926638,0.0000064658066],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004846704,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0032928577,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013496923,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012485225,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005875448,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09058702},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123216792","doi":"10.1017/s0069005800009280","title":"Weaving a Tangled Web:<i>Hape</i>and the Obfuscation of Canadian Reception Law","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Yearbook of international Law/Annuaire canadien de droit international","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Common law; Charter; Supreme court","score_opus":0.010895082368999491,"score_gpt":0.22941838449610846,"score_spread":0.21852330212710896,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123216792","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02115465,0.009539387,0.002732577,0.1573696,0.0014947506,0.0000505669,0.00037459767,0.00014652405,0.80713737],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.720816,0.008418095,0.0029380245,0.032258473,0.00062343915,0.000030662148,0.00020105785,0.00019202426,0.23452222],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99543947,0.0003929806,0.00007220588,0.00034753923,0.0022227694,0.0015251383],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964986,0.00092374155,0.000104079765,0.00026907635,0.0017648413,0.00043959793],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023760442,0.00028444635,0.00032210897,0.0024446642,0.02149684,0.016371427,0.0015107192,0.0029667122,0.013663857],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0069681397,0.0004108713,0.00036820964,0.0025577364,0.020746587,0.003960231,0.0034877488,0.005448851,0.0008242339],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010347087,0.000006781373,0.0005852232,0.000042678625,0.0000050464623,0.00022938082,0.0077524716,0.00016884698,0.00012031511,0.86071,0.113269135,0.017099733],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000076717615,0.000005372214,0.0022974804,0.00019972336,0.000014979337,0.00014502318,0.011718434,0.00037237944,0.0003400968,0.054421447,0.9304207,0.0000565338],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98321116,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98978883,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08948002,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08948002,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.11688878,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.649226},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3123519131","doi":"10.1017/s0069005800007360","title":"Parallel Proceedings — Converging Views: The <i>Westec</i> Appeal","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Yearbook of international Law/Annuaire canadien de droit international","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Comity; Appeal; Flexibility (engineering); Jurisdiction; Race (biology); Law and economics; Law; Political science; Grandiosity; Psychology; Sociology; Social psychology; Economics; Management","score_opus":0.01304379184956695,"score_gpt":0.25763626641313553,"score_spread":0.24459247456356858,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3123519131","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.025533825,0.011011308,0.005172211,0.19359763,0.0009259699,0.000056214543,0.00018282305,0.00007174585,0.7634483],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8323488,0.014932393,0.0049773008,0.037514903,0.0007988151,0.00005579891,0.00024853132,0.00015420245,0.10896913],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98497146,0.0024810787,0.0003333653,0.0010567738,0.008459501,0.002697828],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97843575,0.0070706797,0.0006834651,0.0012828843,0.010250622,0.002276538],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013923222,0.0003658032,0.0005941092,0.005035922,0.01962321,0.027782768,0.0029639842,0.00544072,0.014346683],"category_scores_gemma":[0.033056755,0.00046552095,0.0005069422,0.005049126,0.028129578,0.011827736,0.0073031583,0.011396362,0.00082429673],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019872099,0.000011874413,0.00074919173,0.000052677293,0.000010865589,0.00024326323,0.014950079,0.00014745208,0.000084168845,0.90727466,0.050730634,0.02572527],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014496553,0.000012861647,0.0046208277,0.0006833472,0.000052874195,0.00024006031,0.047780547,0.00062334014,0.0003539912,0.27492142,0.6706094,0.00008678957],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.75876975,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.85537225,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24123025,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06639636,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.081010535,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4853018},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124068151","doi":"","title":"E-Business Law in China: Strengths and Weaknesses","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"MacEwan University","funders":"","keywords":"Electronic signature; China; Foreign direct investment; Business; Digital signature; Certification; Commercial law; The Internet; Electronic business; Law; Political science; Business model; Computer security; Marketing; Computer science","score_opus":0.005222867904479482,"score_gpt":0.2853407110419321,"score_spread":0.28011784313745264,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124068151","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.61602694,0.02664159,0.005078053,0.14084424,0.00067656505,0.0003772242,0.0005001044,0.0002145349,0.20964079],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98451,0.0051185023,0.001215497,0.0049238848,0.0002661294,0.00007975541,0.00013958597,0.000014766894,0.0037318987],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9927747,0.001668393,0.000496959,0.00062151905,0.0035417292,0.00089669134],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9823303,0.006749052,0.001891512,0.0013723742,0.0059922757,0.0016643957],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016491106,0.00038725918,0.00054972986,0.0057328115,0.004305708,0.0061958227,0.0022834146,0.0017626549,0.0025265575],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01837337,0.0003093498,0.00043767912,0.008151725,0.0073415404,0.004698406,0.0033719316,0.0016576176,0.00020751951],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009591439,0.00016796142,0.20268218,0.0010613394,0.00017498486,0.0009776775,0.009023992,0.0037599036,0.0007480834,0.46587625,0.017794648,0.2976371],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015567255,0.00036472644,0.5567356,0.002943043,0.00044239187,0.00080160965,0.021076597,0.019219248,0.002450876,0.14887677,0.24667493,0.0002585363],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0847711,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08415141,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0847711,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015171162,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0437932,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16855532},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124075457","doi":"","title":"Flying Robots and Privacy in Canada","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Trespass; Drone; Tort; Seclusion; Internet privacy; Business; Privacy laws of the United States; Privacy by Design; Information privacy; Computer security; Privacy law; Expectation of privacy; Privacy policy; Political science; Law enforcement; Law; Liability; Computer science","score_opus":0.01814733757848509,"score_gpt":0.26321710293998524,"score_spread":0.24506976536150016,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124075457","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1097068,0.0145592,0.004175942,0.07876421,0.00052616245,0.00009899613,0.0011676431,0.00015262545,0.7908484],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85631174,0.01085806,0.0022513326,0.009692548,0.00008860919,0.00003327782,0.00038715382,0.000046882906,0.12033042],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966685,0.00029150466,0.00008189477,0.0003621315,0.0013544887,0.0012415354],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99711597,0.0006318093,0.00023945651,0.00016371116,0.0012493646,0.0005996335],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012886893,0.00023198151,0.00030796908,0.0012337933,0.015396971,0.007749958,0.001517239,0.002147321,0.014554963],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0043758107,0.00030787633,0.00048234235,0.002537092,0.010214891,0.0023503164,0.0030217608,0.0030528752,0.0006360781],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000050574294,0.000041172094,0.009477319,0.00012029328,0.000021723705,0.00073837175,0.009636082,0.0017713057,0.00027080966,0.86074597,0.058051027,0.05907539],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024005532,0.000038039052,0.027096907,0.0003698311,0.000041091127,0.00044209667,0.013129013,0.0029426743,0.00055727974,0.06032142,0.8949164,0.0001212918],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99375385,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9932713,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11533622,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11533622,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12531063,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.83682674},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124383368","doi":"","title":"Judicial Jurisdiction in Canada: The CJPTA - A Decade of Progress","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Law; Political science; Nova scotia; Context (archaeology); Judicial review; Common law; Sociology; Geography","score_opus":0.012855091849962951,"score_gpt":0.2913338133331039,"score_spread":0.2784787214831409,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124383368","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012785754,0.43575183,0.002525878,0.42503992,0.005110308,0.000042243206,0.0006824565,0.00008353139,0.11797809],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.51379967,0.39835206,0.0051556663,0.05111141,0.0026251564,0.00005107423,0.0006118393,0.000116760544,0.028176403],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9816959,0.0018943218,0.0005745435,0.001670193,0.009871088,0.0042939535],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9695033,0.007132151,0.0011609492,0.00088368176,0.016927158,0.0043927277],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015797552,0.00056430564,0.0012070616,0.005819187,0.01553377,0.021690011,0.0040701455,0.005776518,0.006622667],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03353069,0.00058121874,0.0007485329,0.010854412,0.021948807,0.0073957886,0.004725078,0.009730106,0.00051287544],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031967884,0.000025470812,0.0022886388,0.0008717881,0.000029744506,0.00024471912,0.00529265,0.0008104402,0.00015222456,0.7269501,0.116470784,0.14683145],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021486692,0.000024194245,0.0114061395,0.0035184145,0.000042342406,0.00015401834,0.007959075,0.0007537369,0.00025187887,0.06348262,0.91228503,0.00010103775],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98529667,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98845065,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22249545,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.22249545,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.46929768,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9017951},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3124426488","doi":"10.26686/vuwlr.v36i1.5588","title":"The Needs of the Many and the Needs of the Few: A New System of Public Interest Intervention for New Zealand","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Victoria University of Wellington Law Review","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Lawmaking; Adversarial system; Intervention (counseling); Public interest; Order (exchange); Supreme court; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Fair dealing; Balance (ability); Public relations; Business; Sociology; Legislature; Psychology","score_opus":0.02554518457729594,"score_gpt":0.2556189662009864,"score_spread":0.23007378162369047,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3124426488","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2551749,0.0060281204,0.041630264,0.22329152,0.0010993618,0.002331141,0.00015276605,0.00036325018,0.4699286],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8307655,0.002338536,0.050652385,0.015036905,0.00028604703,0.0008602054,0.000047900045,0.00012569102,0.09988687],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9937511,0.0015601212,0.0004998965,0.0009581495,0.0021012365,0.0011295181],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99507916,0.0012748743,0.00045547154,0.0006886775,0.0009619325,0.0015398699],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0077534863,0.00027141353,0.00048880646,0.00094470684,0.007475212,0.0107933665,0.0018615191,0.0047548455,0.006182416],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011014761,0.00083763537,0.00065525935,0.00051767397,0.012654119,0.006919824,0.007072426,0.006133175,0.00046670213],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001821829,0.0003803788,0.010449287,0.00095664803,0.000071099465,0.0034282806,0.047969725,0.0017762685,0.0138217965,0.73845094,0.030216707,0.15229674],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00039769718,0.0005902566,0.04288396,0.0010559451,0.00019076598,0.002597984,0.021764044,0.0043452336,0.0023579753,0.18245979,0.74087507,0.00048129787],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.25163287,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.46446574,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.25163287,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018312529,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.062072158,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5003364},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125007305","doi":"","title":"Foreign Judgments at Common Law: Rethinking the Enforcement Rules","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; International law; Legal history; Civil law (Civil law); Comparative law; Public law","score_opus":0.018352113265173536,"score_gpt":0.29025956208475373,"score_spread":0.2719074488195802,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125007305","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08247492,0.0052839466,0.14371483,0.1212899,0.0022578575,0.00065559364,0.00037959425,0.0010000757,0.6429432],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87163264,0.0019831785,0.04455514,0.022483664,0.0008295573,0.00022427714,0.00019034227,0.00048704183,0.057614222],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.94039863,0.010271218,0.0036711062,0.0077778115,0.02958761,0.008293655],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9249935,0.03466634,0.002330396,0.011409732,0.023270542,0.0033294489],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04849794,0.0007046759,0.001183923,0.0042070295,0.016300062,0.03108016,0.008291814,0.012387733,0.0038011342],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08104445,0.0012561058,0.0014074262,0.0029686466,0.03579248,0.013518559,0.007268848,0.02168715,0.00092360517],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000102128215,0.000014210017,0.0006425823,0.000022894872,0.000010440056,0.00011775885,0.0032904604,0.00059700134,0.0001977357,0.97681785,0.0075629978,0.010715901],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010121534,0.00009420677,0.004503203,0.0011518318,0.00018790508,0.00027281922,0.00668115,0.01009747,0.0034428842,0.6502566,0.32284433,0.0003663832],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.684841,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6854568,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.684841,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.043688502,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09512525,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6340301},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125233476","doi":"","title":"Freedom of Expression and Location: Are There Constitutional Dead Zones?","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Supreme Court Law Review: Osgoode’s Annual Constitutional Cases Conference","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Charter; Law; Commonwealth; Political science; Freedom of expression; Government (linguistics); Constitutional right; Expression (computer science); Philosophy; Human rights","score_opus":0.041088998735953425,"score_gpt":0.3126134903062507,"score_spread":0.27152449157029723,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125233476","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.052119944,0.011377086,0.04314224,0.15407626,0.0012174646,0.0001309339,0.0006007952,0.00013684876,0.73719835],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9401081,0.0029331218,0.0063596847,0.016794557,0.00089155626,0.00031878002,0.00019717925,0.000094121315,0.032302983],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9887611,0.0040619713,0.0006149549,0.001832154,0.002110277,0.0026195238],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9928965,0.003597809,0.00058670365,0.0014350613,0.00079893955,0.00068502006],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010613348,0.0006810065,0.001310008,0.0013540179,0.008733648,0.018570043,0.004029809,0.0113320155,0.010423649],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01728815,0.00069882517,0.0010983758,0.0016582855,0.064161055,0.021408502,0.009351515,0.013231853,0.001693392],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000043671866,0.000003996926,0.00005632203,0.000008533738,0.0000017138983,0.0000129954815,0.00033406113,0.000045083412,0.000029404206,0.9971955,0.0008939274,0.0014140959],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003623671,0.000022151606,0.0003746764,0.00014639426,0.00001407882,0.00006686712,0.0020964032,0.000146856,0.00022273124,0.93676263,0.060078397,0.000032636268],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019396815,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017851414,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98060316,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007917589,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010357316,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05744636},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125314535","doi":"","title":"The Hague Choice of Court Convention and the Common Law","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Convention; Statutory law; Common law; Political science; Treaty; Legislation","score_opus":0.010592877105990928,"score_gpt":0.30380700147795814,"score_spread":0.2932141243719672,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125314535","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013854821,0.011522211,0.027128277,0.06648267,0.0040472965,0.00037173758,0.00082199153,0.00021902609,0.87555194],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5174531,0.006470044,0.045070205,0.04015923,0.0013896754,0.00096604787,0.0009670093,0.0005214664,0.38700318],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9580994,0.010517164,0.0018943836,0.0046780678,0.02014336,0.0046675485],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98112583,0.006795609,0.0008836112,0.0023937807,0.007486909,0.0013142736],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017482122,0.00056675257,0.0009066681,0.0027269153,0.013821118,0.024841612,0.0042894175,0.010298852,0.007001382],"category_scores_gemma":[0.038062964,0.0008458316,0.0009493388,0.0059353914,0.019993605,0.006133643,0.0042980206,0.01084985,0.0014824134],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006626881,0.0000050925705,0.00012687514,0.000015537546,0.000003320189,0.000022937615,0.0007308831,0.00020075684,0.00006358211,0.9757003,0.018665573,0.004458448],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003523438,0.000025950932,0.0013428059,0.00031393295,0.000023851373,0.00006235222,0.0016427865,0.00062751694,0.00041157292,0.23494688,0.76041925,0.00014796348],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.80955786,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.85149235,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.80955786,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05767945,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13590823,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4184956},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125461684","doi":"","title":"LOST IN TRANSITION: ANSWERING THE QUESTIONS RAISED BY THE SUPREME COURT OF CANADA’S NEW APPROACH TO JURISDICTION","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Jurisdiction; Law; Jurisprudence; Original jurisdiction; Political science; Divergence (linguistics)","score_opus":0.020994341459550578,"score_gpt":0.26034756498327005,"score_spread":0.23935322352371946,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125461684","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17587267,0.024659988,0.006580259,0.49346188,0.0016719496,0.0000968101,0.00033554086,0.000059960355,0.297261],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95901686,0.003982088,0.0017269718,0.023268286,0.00025575532,0.000026321726,0.00006480138,0.00002841658,0.011630443],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.986896,0.0021947746,0.0003068294,0.0011823492,0.0049056667,0.0045143585],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9843203,0.006189411,0.0007799879,0.0006023588,0.0060015433,0.002106325],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009084908,0.00034485466,0.000881282,0.0032438566,0.030235592,0.022296239,0.004994703,0.009122645,0.0032208734],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028870666,0.00040037133,0.00068654364,0.004787661,0.04054738,0.008077515,0.005804675,0.013282921,0.00023223799],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021335882,0.000012990996,0.002609651,0.000061938044,0.000018881356,0.00046022632,0.02640536,0.00046667832,0.00012116905,0.93779385,0.019691853,0.012336098],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000059281905,0.000032944037,0.017355725,0.0014712025,0.00013918536,0.00035220355,0.12013952,0.0035571572,0.000594481,0.4458426,0.4102173,0.000238378],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98596746,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99289215,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17498094,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.17498094,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.20832823,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9569052},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125481302","doi":"10.1017/s2071832200001383","title":"“Transnational Law” as Proto-Concept: Three Conceptions","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"German Law Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":77,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Private law; Political science; Law; Public law; Comparative law; Municipal law; International law; Term (time); Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.02048432206843382,"score_gpt":0.34116796321686693,"score_spread":0.3206836411484331,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125481302","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06577934,0.015962752,0.113400355,0.0301352,0.0011052554,0.0002955998,0.00038333816,0.0002662034,0.77267194],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9316607,0.004364773,0.03498598,0.003997947,0.0005563812,0.0010318037,0.0002996292,0.00014396918,0.022958778],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99720025,0.0012794385,0.00014088642,0.0003983687,0.00067804294,0.0003030147],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99832946,0.0006942138,0.00019090525,0.00027827086,0.0002396933,0.0002674635],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003937741,0.00068628293,0.0005792337,0.0026630128,0.0031527397,0.010339841,0.0017308153,0.0034187296,0.0037797973],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033187887,0.00039210514,0.0006905293,0.0031881942,0.031477552,0.01162067,0.0064854636,0.005141808,0.0006772856],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000024917883,0.0000033741492,0.000050422448,0.0000117059135,9.154267e-7,0.000015472951,0.0018470248,0.000015534148,0.000036901427,0.99658585,0.00044008822,0.0009902816],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010008995,0.000023251134,0.00043175629,0.00012396839,0.0000063248744,0.0002895924,0.0046213646,0.0005078835,0.0002133523,0.9265133,0.06723977,0.000019311123],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021972833,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0013834323,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010339841,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004317493,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022589304,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.031325758},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3125870324","doi":"","title":"‘First Among Equals’: Breaking the Deadlock in Parental and Sibling Funeral Disputes","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Executor; Kinship; Statutory law; Deadlock; Sibling; Law; Common law; Political science; Genealogy; Sociology; Law and economics; History; Computer science","score_opus":0.011795020133626655,"score_gpt":0.2827142158863467,"score_spread":0.27091919575272005,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3125870324","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.64892024,0.002450638,0.06538831,0.043255743,0.00042165455,0.00021092955,0.000039785897,0.000060181625,0.2392525],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9942321,0.00011052991,0.0026757782,0.00083926256,0.000017763994,0.000037433263,0.000006056958,0.000008876717,0.0020722514],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9658778,0.023880174,0.0011139597,0.0021795966,0.0031288243,0.0038196265],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9738392,0.018339429,0.0019219803,0.0020138063,0.0017002214,0.0021852667],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.038278688,0.00021857004,0.0008190665,0.0016398343,0.016472647,0.010517235,0.003440044,0.0065678884,0.003250626],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07612647,0.0005391984,0.0005228016,0.0015796338,0.057322595,0.01362076,0.014459093,0.0067785257,0.00026530388],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000963191,0.000011788889,0.0010891479,0.00001294855,0.0000032242958,0.00023798514,0.042909287,0.000120511526,0.000058043945,0.94983184,0.0005405061,0.00517509],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000048597674,0.000053807194,0.0024381103,0.000330583,0.000020452571,0.0007487825,0.14239945,0.002015016,0.0004121804,0.8103821,0.041092962,0.000057978166],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015565252,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021264123,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.038278688,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008650706,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012475674,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20243943},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3127605035","doi":"","title":"La litispendance internationale et la révocation des donations entre époux en droit international privé québécois après l'arrêt RS c PR","year":2020,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Bar Review","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Dissenting opinion; Supreme court; Interpretation (philosophy); Law; Political science; Jurisdiction; Legislation; Revocation; Impossibility; Philosophy","score_opus":0.04673601920653227,"score_gpt":0.31111832381255056,"score_spread":0.2643823046060183,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3127605035","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.056975663,0.047454536,0.0036451053,0.12986386,0.0043004346,0.0002502967,0.0009601247,0.00019680236,0.75635314],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.41749692,0.01229789,0.0026921935,0.051241614,0.0011884599,0.00020170955,0.00029923907,0.00011291047,0.5144691],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99237,0.0012338299,0.00027767543,0.0007210482,0.0028791528,0.0025182972],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9948059,0.0021129996,0.00030672987,0.000301895,0.00194074,0.00053183886],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009208391,0.0005006579,0.000542308,0.0015502645,0.0110200085,0.008782964,0.0019541485,0.008381147,0.010332091],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011961165,0.0005486518,0.0009064919,0.0015985995,0.0068136957,0.002258061,0.0021633378,0.009862206,0.0008997302],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005617762,0.00003493221,0.0023127515,0.00018701513,0.000031778458,0.00058837666,0.0045314287,0.00020585893,0.00061850547,0.8760428,0.09692307,0.0184674],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000040613744,0.000049647657,0.009626791,0.00031293684,0.00007338113,0.00022304287,0.002031621,0.00021417261,0.0009927766,0.011729885,0.97462636,0.00007882322],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9000341,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.93238133,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09996587,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.032915857,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.075031094,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2388224},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3129244293","doi":"","title":"Legal Recognition of Non-Conjugal Families: New Frontiers in Family Law in the US, Canada and Europe","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Family law; Law; Genealogy; Political science; Sociology; History","score_opus":0.014363771141026308,"score_gpt":0.2351771035032266,"score_spread":0.2208133323622003,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3129244293","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03848616,0.050803214,0.0022987784,0.12127087,0.0014945188,0.000095499854,0.000339705,0.00008059015,0.7851307],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.65860194,0.029834112,0.0019334718,0.019755965,0.0005009155,0.000082461076,0.0003124177,0.00011848593,0.28886023],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9947654,0.00086517865,0.00009563608,0.00026129084,0.0017580909,0.002254344],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953296,0.0014124436,0.00017177785,0.00013143187,0.0018277508,0.0011269492],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003561468,0.00035102104,0.0006023389,0.0022782595,0.0137699125,0.012609736,0.0034889935,0.0055842185,0.009674976],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010528232,0.00034122495,0.00043913763,0.0038032439,0.01653545,0.0036149703,0.003821656,0.005000156,0.0005284668],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011552316,0.00004358227,0.0024757828,0.000048443195,0.000005161713,0.00019776032,0.013333034,0.00036746688,0.00006541563,0.8172551,0.117672585,0.048524175],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018403312,0.000020995567,0.018352576,0.0012305395,0.000025282894,0.00034048324,0.057409488,0.0013295765,0.00028938384,0.13044551,0.7904498,0.00008793288],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9774605,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9904648,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08094732,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08094732,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.24337922,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.58731663},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W31326347","doi":"10.1016/j.jcjq.2019.05.012","title":"Die Anerkennung und Vollstreckung ausländischer Urteile nach kanadischem Recht (Supreme Court of Canada, 18.12.2003 - Beals v. Saldanha)","year":2007,"lang":"de","type":"article","venue":"IPRax: Praxis des Internationalen Privat- und Verfahrensrechts","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development; National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences","keywords":"Supreme court; Political science; Humanities; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.03530740473711649,"score_gpt":0.3204974065646801,"score_spread":0.2851900018275636,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W31326347","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14024575,0.0029702634,0.009271683,0.17972517,0.0034740241,0.0008952204,0.0027776663,0.0007993105,0.6598409],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.56195664,0.0015423181,0.0044602603,0.13117552,0.0004039205,0.00044901742,0.00053721364,0.00019280687,0.29928225],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9899504,0.00075255835,0.00044850036,0.00081395486,0.003466506,0.0045681796],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9927167,0.002037129,0.000489419,0.0005922868,0.0027258028,0.001438671],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005913633,0.00038272695,0.00048715566,0.00075176544,0.012806074,0.0045949584,0.002541389,0.010170047,0.009518673],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013749684,0.0009532638,0.0011139426,0.0010556796,0.003688237,0.001311819,0.0029073807,0.011859937,0.0013205104],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028743895,0.0003209749,0.04798699,0.00027450328,0.0001739957,0.0033551122,0.010824013,0.0017669714,0.004817538,0.3265021,0.52926916,0.074421205],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00026989332,0.0002775531,0.103594474,0.0007193889,0.0002258493,0.0014141359,0.008377467,0.0023009523,0.003982989,0.017216891,0.8611458,0.00047461514],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9545757,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98601913,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.045424283,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.031648703,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.10927972,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2296285},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3132954373","doi":"","title":"Digital Legal Deposit in Selected Jurisdictions: Australia, Canada, China, Estonia, France, Germany, Israel, Italy, Japan, Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, South Korea, Spain, United Kingdom","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Lincoln (University of Nebraska)","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Library of Australia","keywords":"Geography; China; Kingdom; Environmental protection; Archaeology","score_opus":0.013028912757024039,"score_gpt":0.23695895694228805,"score_spread":0.22393004418526402,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3132954373","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.73176026,0.022415325,0.0003653013,0.0029821435,0.00016443827,0.00020406637,0.01536791,0.00008203692,0.22665852],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8953747,0.017299388,0.0012521417,0.0004279442,0.000047395155,0.0000847836,0.00525552,0.000052488078,0.08020565],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988431,0.00009742746,0.00008587823,0.00010674364,0.00049882004,0.0003680937],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964631,0.00038568163,0.00063729,0.00013509608,0.0018946484,0.00048412674],"candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010199754,0.00017038973,0.00024828146,0.0070917057,0.0024755558,0.002233972,0.00062395626,0.00025882266,0.009681529],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0030830735,0.0002289376,0.0001736418,0.018478671,0.001250179,0.0013830641,0.0017139242,0.00041467667,0.0007607326],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002303298,0.00014194363,0.57662034,0.0020610343,0.0001493927,0.0012090236,0.02847527,0.0009922818,0.0007273355,0.0416269,0.09689041,0.25087583],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000093499675,0.000020681608,0.8408355,0.0003802238,0.000027672964,0.00028412533,0.014208184,0.00022326935,0.00036716022,0.00037371618,0.14325419,0.000015971042],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7214464,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8366358,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.997766,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007116976,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013335226,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5603881},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3134615578","doi":"","title":"Persisting Uncertainties in Appellate Jurisdiction at the Supreme Court","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Original jurisdiction; Law; Jurisdiction; Remand (court procedure); Political science; Certiorari; Court of record; Court of equity","score_opus":0.012412844068183578,"score_gpt":0.26082107591047066,"score_spread":0.24840823184228708,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3134615578","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3177795,0.010671978,0.019816328,0.37869665,0.0008727133,0.000056031065,0.0005053681,0.00006843355,0.2715329],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9900158,0.00066452846,0.00077289675,0.0059225387,0.0002245036,0.000009538185,0.00004004811,0.000014271112,0.002335957],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9700178,0.0072298157,0.0012520505,0.003947556,0.00985398,0.007698796],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9285934,0.050752107,0.004246288,0.002201433,0.010126959,0.0040798006],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.036704317,0.00019351719,0.000809032,0.0017231972,0.016988399,0.022885788,0.0038459366,0.008646144,0.003092444],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08327798,0.00042317153,0.0006109812,0.0033795002,0.028147351,0.010812567,0.0056199115,0.013627597,0.00032477782],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020801497,0.000009652989,0.004381262,0.000022880733,0.000019172561,0.00039246443,0.013925667,0.0007237489,0.00016115066,0.9631203,0.006443694,0.010779307],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026531257,0.000029852377,0.013568811,0.00047593156,0.0000814727,0.0003570195,0.040732354,0.0033702964,0.00074071425,0.82535356,0.115071066,0.00019237498],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.38940105,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.56694376,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.38940105,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04562243,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.046808712,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.774269},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3135539140","doi":"10.3917/rcdip.181.0003","title":"L’exception de prévisibilité","year":2018,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue critique de droit international privé","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.0202303535849991,"score_gpt":0.3429983308759759,"score_spread":0.32276797729097684,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3135539140","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.027812684,0.0035518978,0.064345516,0.036049757,0.0018664462,0.00012042173,0.00022724288,0.000520453,0.86550546],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.69618183,0.0025338111,0.025766613,0.022211215,0.0015703966,0.00046865587,0.00037183287,0.0007604918,0.25013524],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.96699476,0.007954584,0.0019481727,0.0066416278,0.011761603,0.0046992595],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9813312,0.005964302,0.0016763349,0.0038214822,0.006287998,0.0009185619],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015918167,0.00090254,0.0010346215,0.0015794782,0.005105744,0.016019305,0.0031192983,0.0072295396,0.011260445],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025094513,0.00076492084,0.0016249068,0.0011111223,0.016582925,0.009105244,0.007589395,0.013891962,0.0024924597],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018256711,0.0000101928945,0.0006188474,0.000047180038,0.00001031578,0.00010330867,0.0030656718,0.00031346825,0.00025136987,0.98302215,0.00499902,0.007540075],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029366442,0.000103379345,0.0024614758,0.00054857857,0.000049061724,0.00054355315,0.002722426,0.0010810607,0.0018112183,0.31524938,0.67529917,0.000101379606],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.032129038,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018481798,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.032129038,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008385836,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016101198,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08418429},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3137028859","doi":"","title":"The Use of Overseas Case Law in the Australian PPSA","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Legislation; Common law; Legislature; Law; Personal property; Political science; Property (philosophy); Business","score_opus":0.06122967173051668,"score_gpt":0.3132699337392461,"score_spread":0.2520402620087294,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3137028859","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.16346085,0.016650716,0.021692095,0.052821722,0.0014775263,0.00014661544,0.00005906262,0.000047959813,0.7436434],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94342047,0.004946491,0.0049797087,0.010704723,0.00047266297,0.00009660572,0.000028473627,0.000032714735,0.0353181],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98160595,0.011154148,0.0007775727,0.0014966566,0.0037865322,0.0011791976],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9740859,0.017527334,0.0016033232,0.0024541595,0.0029294197,0.001399777],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.024063597,0.00026164443,0.00044614775,0.002514392,0.00721811,0.010659242,0.0013786671,0.0031940613,0.0043472047],"category_scores_gemma":[0.027157018,0.0005362598,0.0004747321,0.0026094685,0.022381965,0.0075387736,0.010074633,0.006325528,0.00046357384],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000074516415,0.000015811407,0.0011345856,0.00007647717,0.000005817313,0.00042123644,0.021611778,0.00016990064,0.00020068219,0.95542896,0.0023787392,0.018548654],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000016697697,0.00013736545,0.016159661,0.001975805,0.00004901832,0.0012873408,0.027107073,0.002816889,0.0006777052,0.33222014,0.61746126,0.000091058544],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04445634,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.056650516,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04445634,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010103464,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009776086,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.127262},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3139194885","doi":"10.1111/fcre.12559","title":"The Hague Convention and Transnational Custody Disputes","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Family Court Review","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Convention; Jurisdiction; Residence; Law; Conflict of laws; Supreme court; Political science; Child custody; Convention on the Rights of the Child; Personal jurisdiction; Psychology; Sociology; Human rights; Demography","score_opus":0.024254080818758357,"score_gpt":0.326433527995847,"score_spread":0.30217944717708867,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3139194885","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015116069,0.0076639075,0.0045525217,0.011946778,0.0004828389,0.0000589448,0.00012433165,0.000037513215,0.9600171],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8212067,0.0072253845,0.0037657395,0.019678634,0.0006341267,0.00043259424,0.0002200202,0.00015238566,0.14668451],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9779474,0.006426815,0.0010531807,0.0031794414,0.006332694,0.005060517],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9938778,0.002892633,0.0005010848,0.0008463963,0.0013828495,0.0004991755],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013984777,0.0006807736,0.0010414554,0.0037786195,0.02388754,0.022274261,0.004087309,0.01570505,0.011644859],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0213048,0.0009828527,0.0010396978,0.00622916,0.03847868,0.013533319,0.013473846,0.013606089,0.00111153],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000018270223,0.0000022984457,0.000059297483,0.000004324572,0.0000014445359,0.000049440212,0.00069384486,0.00006444199,0.000009410541,0.99608517,0.0021244837,0.00090409373],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027541175,0.000015425525,0.0009185563,0.00045867736,0.000018668981,0.00025324506,0.0057468773,0.000713011,0.0001454923,0.6961778,0.29543355,0.00009117596],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.39205045,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3579076,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.39205045,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.036213905,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.031976312,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7795369},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3139238919","doi":"10.9785/9783504386962-021","title":"The lex loci delicti Rule in Canadian Conflict of Laws","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Verlag Dr. Otto Schmidt eBooks","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Conflict of laws; Law; Political science; Biology; Genealogy; History","score_opus":0.04094449221733419,"score_gpt":0.2855148081430966,"score_spread":0.2445703159257624,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3139238919","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011155843,0.010199625,0.0006183527,0.023284856,0.00048156784,0.000034860244,0.00022703614,0.00003256663,0.9539652],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.63151205,0.012331108,0.0017310359,0.0051079667,0.00022466683,0.000059170463,0.00027126417,0.00007159598,0.3486912],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99747145,0.00023357374,0.00005278603,0.00016171977,0.0009840511,0.0010963639],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989988,0.00021748336,0.00004681587,0.000043587697,0.00048195515,0.0002114021],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011473589,0.00037510105,0.0003602557,0.0023360404,0.017049568,0.008696363,0.0014313379,0.0025390137,0.015202064],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0035862986,0.0003155539,0.00023517795,0.0035645373,0.010512501,0.0017720626,0.0023011533,0.0037986215,0.0009230979],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008124947,0.0000063828943,0.00056030584,0.000034572335,0.0000027459685,0.00014418925,0.007471849,0.0002280034,0.000047173595,0.8769199,0.090403825,0.024172992],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009558691,0.000007073233,0.0056775953,0.00035946307,0.000011424653,0.0001681879,0.013974631,0.00043120366,0.00011192602,0.0722703,0.9069356,0.000043135355],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98169863,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99240714,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10131846,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10131846,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.11837156,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.73512036},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3139949028","doi":"10.17159/obiter.v41i1.10546","title":"Contractual Capacity and the Conflict of Laws in Common-Law Jurisdictions (Part 2): Australasia, North America, Asia and Africa","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Obiter","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Law; Common law; Conflict of laws; Comparative law; Civil law (Civil law); Political science; Private law; Position (finance); Municipal law; Choice of law; Public law; Business","score_opus":0.043301375399198275,"score_gpt":0.27123275677887093,"score_spread":0.22793138137967267,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3139949028","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.36736497,0.058360532,0.004620541,0.020565929,0.00046346564,0.00011857407,0.00004147976,0.000013210338,0.54845124],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9906165,0.0045447242,0.0005732064,0.00065425585,0.00008425311,0.000041041403,0.000010465802,0.000004747273,0.003470855],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99622226,0.0018414281,0.00017577715,0.00019789205,0.00075720774,0.0008054318],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961128,0.0022407416,0.00075121614,0.00014365048,0.00036941803,0.0003821122],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003137531,0.0002515458,0.00028417475,0.0022411668,0.0053182305,0.006958047,0.00067847787,0.0017809956,0.0034773585],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0059866034,0.00017746807,0.00029717345,0.0031127557,0.019519964,0.0061380775,0.0040929476,0.0022463303,0.000106488056],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010838161,0.000025779484,0.002256195,0.00012932195,0.000006774894,0.00033454335,0.08277881,0.00015490025,0.00023605392,0.8985303,0.0014096379,0.014126808],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028574825,0.0001612492,0.045121785,0.002617741,0.000034059176,0.002290095,0.27318838,0.00086405565,0.00062455225,0.3643456,0.31065378,0.00007010531],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023235366,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02353826,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023235366,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0054428927,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0055541163,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.046200275},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3140923647","doi":"","title":"COURT OF APPEAL FOR ONTARIO","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.029134159508970005,"score_gpt":0.319971863978682,"score_spread":0.29083770446971197,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3140923647","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018648982,0.0030961463,0.0005192863,0.1415979,0.005209458,0.0016404547,0.005530503,0.00026535025,0.823492],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.028813094,0.00092417526,0.00034884247,0.06273889,0.00083283446,0.0005786227,0.00053147506,0.00008793914,0.90514416],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9929971,0.0003112147,0.00021933747,0.0008111959,0.0025760974,0.003085104],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99421966,0.0013761107,0.00013999124,0.00026725655,0.0027977843,0.0011991872],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028044947,0.0012487717,0.0021359946,0.0023716716,0.03706902,0.0094003035,0.0038036448,0.03515433,0.06834079],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012819017,0.0025172327,0.002576288,0.002513788,0.0031451194,0.0020031398,0.0026924298,0.015555385,0.0103771],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00029375532,0.00012132727,0.004084521,0.00015881889,0.00011440789,0.0017412876,0.0022865273,0.0002699087,0.0005751438,0.075501665,0.9065555,0.008297203],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023605466,0.000036368572,0.010242182,0.00024835992,0.00014869294,0.00015529596,0.0018158865,0.0005286736,0.0002892095,0.0060544875,0.9801189,0.00012592728],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96212506,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99073094,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96212506,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0745883,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.18170473,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5411785},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3142066918","doi":"","title":"COURT OF APPEAL FOR ONTARIO","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.08406018535968542,"score_gpt":0.307653976796292,"score_spread":0.22359379143660657,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3142066918","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019600717,0.003021704,0.0005247816,0.14119434,0.004944204,0.001560273,0.0052761743,0.0002530686,0.82362473],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.031020403,0.0009103705,0.00035311305,0.060484163,0.0008043939,0.0005509302,0.00051866105,0.00008787223,0.90527004],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9929635,0.00032002392,0.00022195077,0.00082555995,0.0025671849,0.0031017442],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99431807,0.0013284377,0.0001377252,0.00026524955,0.0027684683,0.0011820475],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027115417,0.001177095,0.0019654217,0.0021731115,0.036621995,0.009294176,0.003659871,0.0335785,0.06666914],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012351941,0.002425092,0.002459627,0.002351146,0.0031198007,0.0019668168,0.0027474614,0.015195497,0.009861368],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002925998,0.00012347594,0.004427466,0.00016436183,0.00011819384,0.0019599984,0.0024473933,0.0002748105,0.00065596116,0.08119995,0.89941853,0.008917202],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00021364403,0.000035473964,0.010414861,0.00024087905,0.0001410015,0.00017035575,0.0018912357,0.0005162542,0.00029889785,0.0062066675,0.97974616,0.000124509],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96193016,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9908318,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07534877,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07534877,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.18677421,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5466962},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3143023780","doi":"","title":"Exporting Same-Sex Marriage, Importing Same-Sex Divorce (Or How Canada’s Marriage and Divorce Laws Unleashed a Private International Law Nightmare and What to Do About It)","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nightmare; Law; Conflict of laws; Political science; Criminology; Sociology; Psychology","score_opus":0.019940484880154038,"score_gpt":0.31109343616841234,"score_spread":0.2911529512882583,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3143023780","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13533774,0.006303675,0.0014096546,0.24138923,0.0027108355,0.00010452547,0.0012372435,0.00008190234,0.6114252],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.65756726,0.005976156,0.0014163804,0.12729101,0.0004963641,0.000053996453,0.00047996777,0.00010499839,0.20661384],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9935539,0.00054937,0.00020925331,0.00043989936,0.0015585326,0.003689068],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9956845,0.0010566951,0.00034748137,0.00028772803,0.001533181,0.0010903352],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037471596,0.0002469782,0.000404166,0.0010878755,0.024075486,0.009873817,0.0018925248,0.0052679963,0.011545812],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010597654,0.0003218321,0.00057096704,0.002176698,0.013245719,0.0053053563,0.0039670137,0.008044728,0.00054470316],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014829195,0.000053949396,0.0111456765,0.00008516036,0.000018588787,0.0003319019,0.039914496,0.00009060329,0.00021270273,0.80230135,0.12379982,0.022030894],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000150373735,0.000015824122,0.02833837,0.00052990724,0.000043580105,0.0002536795,0.14457586,0.00020265675,0.00057693396,0.035099685,0.79022294,0.00012543538],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9794652,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99187917,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03985255,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03985255,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.15214139,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2891518},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3146550811","doi":"","title":"Cross-Border Transfers of Court Proceedings Judical","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Law; Political science; Interpretation (philosophy); Transfer (computing); Judicial review; Computer science","score_opus":0.012850033173358578,"score_gpt":0.3831301442597012,"score_spread":0.3702801110863426,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3146550811","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11043724,0.0026494712,0.02148062,0.030216131,0.0012382806,0.00014845151,0.00011771862,0.0001662813,0.8335458],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9329143,0.000821785,0.003286248,0.011466169,0.0005130492,0.00009494091,0.000066085166,0.000072016905,0.05076539],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9853461,0.005217092,0.0006550855,0.0016351598,0.004802714,0.0023438493],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9897876,0.00538231,0.0007993512,0.0020307289,0.0015092363,0.00049077766],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00930916,0.0002341979,0.0004066072,0.0015639657,0.0076690638,0.009315345,0.0018807872,0.0054974672,0.01506715],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030239034,0.00038229392,0.00047356286,0.001588467,0.008882142,0.0078108464,0.0073457463,0.009607718,0.0017772195],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018919309,0.00003405401,0.0009242333,0.000027469738,0.000012165455,0.00034040518,0.0049567316,0.00023059692,0.0003287868,0.96929115,0.007598695,0.016236797],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000707603,0.00013469052,0.010080464,0.0007586543,0.00005891998,0.001119027,0.0148538025,0.0028835477,0.0031095084,0.483461,0.48337382,0.00009585315],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006718097,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008032607,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01506715,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0039387844,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005279992,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.050404668},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3148514299","doi":"","title":"COURT OF APPEAL FOR ONTARIO","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Law; Political science; History","score_opus":0.05290381990451381,"score_gpt":0.3098131237803991,"score_spread":0.2569093038758853,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3148514299","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019191703,0.0028821342,0.00050467555,0.13986428,0.004926736,0.001594072,0.00537732,0.00025885954,0.8254002],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.028676191,0.0008837624,0.00034271876,0.06353439,0.0007966938,0.00057479244,0.00051568577,0.00008882452,0.90458703],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99301344,0.00031131305,0.00021629356,0.0008126699,0.0025611187,0.0030851902],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9942027,0.0014066179,0.00013873092,0.00026881945,0.0028039387,0.0011791992],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027774652,0.0012164569,0.002081127,0.0022833722,0.03686396,0.009337118,0.0038012713,0.03525041,0.069048434],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012590378,0.002499243,0.002549308,0.0024014234,0.0031976798,0.00200126,0.0027543055,0.015763536,0.010529523],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00028682713,0.00012329649,0.004143747,0.00015702132,0.00011135095,0.0017499465,0.002347599,0.00026515537,0.0006033306,0.07756379,0.9041761,0.008471764],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023247235,0.000035598703,0.010275837,0.00024820317,0.00014387067,0.00015736018,0.0018686065,0.000528318,0.00029389502,0.0061530876,0.97993845,0.00012431973],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96147656,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99040574,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96147656,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.073800154,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.18360125,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5354601},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3149844019","doi":"10.1093/icon/moab102","title":"Comparative law at the heart of immigration law: Criminal inadmissibility and conjugal immigration in Canada and the United States","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Constitutional Law","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Immigration; Immigration law; Law; Criminal law; Comparative law; Political science; State (computer science); Sociology","score_opus":0.021672226556005276,"score_gpt":0.31211759102192743,"score_spread":0.2904453644659222,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3149844019","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7474692,0.013631175,0.0007696937,0.01777192,0.00020101374,0.000069408954,0.0004646865,0.000019801217,0.2196031],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9921897,0.002124699,0.00023434417,0.00059617334,0.000014760863,0.000013203342,0.00009063086,0.000007693593,0.00472865],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963038,0.00081734336,0.000099198594,0.00027973275,0.0010294021,0.0014706402],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.993255,0.002127112,0.00042152562,0.00020627031,0.0028774063,0.0011127169],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033451207,0.00022981326,0.0005380974,0.00797912,0.02564873,0.008199973,0.0016816172,0.0015708423,0.005809039],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014442632,0.00022344086,0.00030000822,0.012248126,0.019899385,0.0029567205,0.0044865035,0.0027884673,0.00013539627],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013097911,0.00014309767,0.09956683,0.00029095451,0.00007371947,0.0014390621,0.21080908,0.0009556048,0.00030551993,0.5971643,0.01685258,0.072268344],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027420178,0.00006451868,0.25831392,0.0014198443,0.0001175954,0.00049816375,0.5761921,0.0011960223,0.0004967078,0.029558677,0.13197823,0.0001368159],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99514633,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9977239,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14993688,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.14993688,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13766763,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98595273},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3150294960","doi":"","title":"Le contrat de mariage en droit québécois : Un destin marqué du sceau du paradoxe","year":2006,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.004327173251825506,"score_gpt":0.20983599832189767,"score_spread":0.20550882507007218,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3150294960","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23297217,0.0072846264,0.0037417382,0.3485177,0.0008301199,0.00003517009,0.00023742384,0.000043694774,0.4063374],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95988625,0.0008665643,0.000514807,0.013366455,0.00011078671,0.000021150345,0.000025853222,0.000027381337,0.025180815],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9953648,0.0016022829,0.00008130222,0.000493621,0.00084928906,0.0016086317],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9944323,0.0026213718,0.00043950925,0.00049422774,0.0013620504,0.0006504548],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005985165,0.000365432,0.0008722226,0.0015782131,0.021661248,0.007728718,0.0018738466,0.01025935,0.009473584],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012594308,0.0003157387,0.00052328664,0.002275076,0.024593152,0.0050366106,0.004579382,0.008506917,0.00042361414],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003269952,0.000011883111,0.0018896419,0.00003854349,0.000022267153,0.00053828553,0.016892133,0.0003133804,0.00011156471,0.9537388,0.021528004,0.004882743],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000094517825,0.000025028685,0.01112154,0.0007015333,0.00008130714,0.00090253,0.09175926,0.0019230648,0.00045513772,0.49519154,0.39759365,0.00015093984],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8873459,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9046128,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11265409,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03616249,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.033661757,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26237845},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3150368514","doi":"","title":"COURT OF APPEAL FOR ONTARIO","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.02806408851281638,"score_gpt":0.3228265749649389,"score_spread":0.2947624864521225,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3150368514","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0186888,0.002964912,0.00051607785,0.14001568,0.005101746,0.0016129642,0.005594543,0.0002600376,0.8252453],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.029091245,0.00091247587,0.00034971634,0.0634274,0.000826794,0.00057598273,0.00053314114,0.00008971772,0.9041934],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.992963,0.00031269182,0.00022125727,0.0008309957,0.0025778546,0.0030942014],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99422646,0.0013896385,0.00013687232,0.00026860883,0.0027924534,0.0011859423],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002761562,0.0012229244,0.0020759443,0.002257627,0.036729172,0.009386905,0.0038187327,0.035325088,0.0685396],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012569724,0.002497862,0.0025773947,0.002404049,0.003188055,0.0019943519,0.0027523413,0.015922096,0.010657492],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002941694,0.00012513745,0.0041031362,0.00016098522,0.00011406485,0.0018171581,0.0023111212,0.00026427003,0.0006255251,0.07728036,0.90441924,0.008484814],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023374292,0.000035516045,0.010212768,0.0002496678,0.0001438769,0.00016297433,0.001828981,0.0005202194,0.000297999,0.0061922423,0.9799958,0.00012618459],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96083397,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99036205,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.073594704,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.073594704,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.18253544,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.53396946},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3154848296","doi":"10.1017/s0069005800009024","title":"Four Flaws: Reflections on the Canadian Approach to Private International Law","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Yearbook of international Law/Annuaire canadien de droit international","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Conflict of laws; International law; Political science; Jurisprudence; Public international law; Private law; Public law; Terminology; Consistency (knowledge bases); Comparative law; Federalism; CLARITY; Constitution","score_opus":0.02978425839318673,"score_gpt":0.2946982329152556,"score_spread":0.2649139745220689,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3154848296","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.024761844,0.0076041864,0.0065134144,0.3646806,0.0017991445,0.00008022978,0.00037533455,0.00012817174,0.5940571],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7982205,0.008179967,0.010884201,0.070118256,0.00088111765,0.00010708898,0.0002326611,0.0002360031,0.11114012],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9839946,0.0023558876,0.00036334418,0.0012585588,0.0081444485,0.0038830724],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9857669,0.004521553,0.00037052177,0.00078398775,0.006968265,0.0015888514],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009068821,0.00053220295,0.0006486205,0.0041940985,0.034622647,0.019368865,0.0040039443,0.008386625,0.007579974],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019545913,0.0005892554,0.00087337056,0.005017342,0.038291514,0.0072254674,0.0053532654,0.013115714,0.00047336065],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000055428454,0.0000054544143,0.00015663895,0.000016405049,0.0000023920718,0.000051014293,0.003988549,0.00014075065,0.00003237564,0.9793331,0.012804687,0.003462966],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000032214983,0.000015370528,0.0024272155,0.00047644248,0.00004206959,0.000201345,0.017935192,0.0014346843,0.00031379913,0.36237854,0.6145692,0.00017388501],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98789155,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9896163,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8041588,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.19584118,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.20762435,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.93271023},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3155326177","doi":"","title":"The Constitutionality of Using Production Orders to Obtain Stored Communications Content","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionality; Charter; Production (economics); Parliament; Law; Order (exchange); State (computer science); Supreme court; Phrase; Political science; Economic Justice; Section (typography); Computer science; Business; Advertising; Economics; Politics; Algorithm","score_opus":0.0872357522293535,"score_gpt":0.3693318671618149,"score_spread":0.2820961149324614,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3155326177","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07365692,0.0011332053,0.04694229,0.022716874,0.0007843643,0.0006079382,0.0014459842,0.0009183542,0.85179394],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8464271,0.0006724415,0.018456038,0.014961434,0.00062332256,0.0012092248,0.00039291603,0.00036766654,0.11688975],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.96165013,0.007829777,0.004122539,0.0074568177,0.01360663,0.0053341254],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95488495,0.022587216,0.002253308,0.013348072,0.006119363,0.00080714916],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02408789,0.00065106,0.0008298623,0.0016586431,0.010270793,0.018146083,0.0037919404,0.0128411455,0.008878007],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04486348,0.002598051,0.0012356314,0.0022658189,0.016091304,0.012967163,0.005780175,0.011711236,0.003833922],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005149765,0.000033903874,0.00034263634,0.000032588403,0.000013281558,0.0001804094,0.0021186569,0.00014628319,0.0010718859,0.9832237,0.007533289,0.0052519115],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00038179057,0.0005126796,0.0030539357,0.0007353169,0.00026520732,0.00090708514,0.0031029305,0.0030170036,0.021417728,0.4661605,0.500012,0.00043394393],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.053533502,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05460096,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.053533502,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008745215,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017730301,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12739044},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3159327241","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3910648","title":"International Law Association’s Guidelines on Intellectual Property and Private International Law (“Kyoto Guidelines”): Jurisdiction","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Law; Intellectual property; Conflict of laws; International law; Political science; Subject-matter jurisdiction; Business; Original jurisdiction","score_opus":0.033178313282403615,"score_gpt":0.3306543823224574,"score_spread":0.2974760690400538,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3159327241","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0065195975,0.017633073,0.046415586,0.17714189,0.04037103,0.0045952206,0.013297226,0.003075503,0.690951],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.07864779,0.027336469,0.21067043,0.21243681,0.020596467,0.021690555,0.018453985,0.0030128846,0.40715456],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9377104,0.0138967605,0.018104738,0.0031277493,0.021798538,0.005361908],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.914681,0.03888682,0.0051261606,0.008192991,0.030248053,0.0028650616],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03593473,0.001945227,0.003640967,0.009835617,0.008296383,0.021996677,0.006998839,0.051464792,0.017689414],"category_scores_gemma":[0.106293045,0.00401228,0.0037236025,0.012647431,0.010856071,0.011614231,0.007626326,0.036173377,0.019689055],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007982426,0.0003376291,0.00059673365,0.00086596824,0.00007512466,0.00030334445,0.0020696598,0.00039819934,0.0007711967,0.34703854,0.61884224,0.028621588],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000091976624,0.000045886914,0.0037115216,0.0026953577,0.00015897349,0.00031334668,0.00076220947,0.000519162,0.0008655575,0.12006145,0.8705483,0.00022616806],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0375775,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.041220065,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.051464792,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005629958,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.053741198,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19004327},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3160375458","doi":"10.1093/jiplp/jpaa196","title":"Canadian Federal Court of Appeal Rules it can interpret contracts: rejects Goldilocks approach to jurisdiction  <i>Salt Canada Inc v Baker</i>, 2020 FCA 127, 28 July 2020","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Jurisdiction; Goldilocks principle; Law; Federal court; Political science; Taste; Law and economics; Economics; Psychology; Supreme court","score_opus":0.019796597576460375,"score_gpt":0.262074863091499,"score_spread":0.24227826551503864,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3160375458","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021982038,0.0016398547,0.0050790864,0.24653696,0.0016947984,0.00041431544,0.002116517,0.0003969887,0.7201393],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5150067,0.0015839285,0.010001681,0.22908543,0.00091760576,0.00041633288,0.00093808013,0.000312667,0.2417375],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97425985,0.0020882725,0.0011300871,0.0020800505,0.01151696,0.008924797],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.969875,0.010319436,0.0006049082,0.0015506725,0.015415996,0.0022339884],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017692076,0.00063307775,0.00102942,0.003561947,0.025290448,0.016157754,0.0060743974,0.020988248,0.018681834],"category_scores_gemma":[0.059035,0.0014790011,0.0012158684,0.0028773246,0.009340055,0.0038239677,0.003815641,0.014357422,0.002709366],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005691193,0.00003405592,0.002936581,0.000049749367,0.00002486393,0.0005558538,0.0022660794,0.0006356352,0.0004858268,0.6020893,0.3800954,0.010769806],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016767193,0.000037667676,0.0069376207,0.00061848137,0.00018646718,0.00023491119,0.00443377,0.0050253365,0.001293248,0.1042738,0.8763981,0.00039297662],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.973963,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98681784,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08430457,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08430457,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.24803206,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6116754},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3160920373","doi":"","title":"The forms and architects of China's international legal order","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Oxford University Research Archive (ORA) (University of Oxford)","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"China; Law; Political science; Comparative law; Private law; Chinese law; Law and economics; Economics","score_opus":0.01977485562290755,"score_gpt":0.2780488031252014,"score_spread":0.2582739475022939,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3160920373","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.43845358,0.0020220785,0.016797984,0.015218025,0.00016420179,0.00031549553,0.00015450742,0.0001552141,0.5267189],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9866964,0.0004597348,0.002765071,0.00041015187,0.00005081286,0.000074781514,0.000043344942,0.000018603712,0.009481096],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99757665,0.00057002803,0.0001465041,0.0004917971,0.0006385284,0.00057649874],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982351,0.00060841674,0.00018879127,0.00035896432,0.0002763221,0.00033244048],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033074517,0.00024698125,0.00031844733,0.002950428,0.0052066925,0.0069267186,0.0008505823,0.0012259714,0.0034149156],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0034652671,0.00037914072,0.00029355832,0.0023807553,0.02951057,0.0041724807,0.0027389536,0.00254023,0.00018918],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000032710607,0.000004876274,0.0017512233,0.000013924663,0.000002795438,0.00011297057,0.008406301,0.00034190537,0.00015156862,0.9825414,0.00062949356,0.006040179],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000045322013,0.000057708432,0.031897936,0.00023764456,0.00003532497,0.00022914357,0.0122897895,0.0063749105,0.00071925856,0.79395294,0.15407108,0.000089021494],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06503095,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06801501,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06503095,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015015693,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017773455,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12930483},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3162675507","doi":"10.1093/law/9780198840107.003.0067","title":"Canada","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Choice of law; Jurisdiction; Conflict of laws; Law; Political science; Legislature; Competence (human resources); Autonomy; Public administration; Economics; Management","score_opus":0.0239355248983954,"score_gpt":0.21573659232885034,"score_spread":0.19180106743045494,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3162675507","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0004648832,0.002877649,0.00020013282,0.0029719728,0.00054283993,0.000022063026,0.0021622046,0.000115505005,0.9906426],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.004158689,0.0019831674,0.0003261851,0.00093554857,0.00004859868,0.000011314428,0.0009472403,0.00006633972,0.9915229],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994254,0.000025116286,0.000013304221,0.00010069487,0.00029901558,0.00013646914],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994759,0.000031717063,0.000010409154,0.000028906048,0.00035753162,0.00009561762],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002671036,0.0005718357,0.00042381504,0.0016400855,0.0068866825,0.0051848507,0.000979809,0.0015440191,0.4049156],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000761864,0.00029028536,0.00034978957,0.0030034063,0.0009439331,0.0014504443,0.0012976163,0.0015619172,0.094539605],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019260497,0.000012989521,0.00035100552,0.00012704729,0.0000033968372,0.00017157529,0.00043075156,0.00013455443,0.00018368833,0.11531216,0.80724007,0.07601349],"study_design_scores_gemma":[9.729583e-7,9.031493e-7,0.00016118768,0.000028720138,6.5527166e-7,0.000020829428,0.00008416535,0.000016653103,0.000021917791,0.0006896423,0.99897206,0.0000022226338],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.86039037,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9402866,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4049156,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.026571732,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.028279841,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3163144258","doi":"10.1017/9781108597135.013","title":"Cambridge Studies in International and Comparative Law","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Content (measure theory); Action (physics); Computer science; Law; Information retrieval; Political science; Mathematics; Physics","score_opus":0.1774137959823022,"score_gpt":0.4383854440602534,"score_spread":0.26097164807795126,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3163144258","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0014254415,0.08869057,0.0002806146,0.03728349,0.0017115577,0.00001894341,0.0018762135,0.00006406719,0.868649],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1974129,0.12323023,0.0007402934,0.008997023,0.007586885,0.00021108262,0.0037108546,0.00022392147,0.6578868],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993112,0.00026128106,0.000038944225,0.00008286088,0.00023376077,0.00007194541],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985299,0.0007326914,0.000076751465,0.00019142182,0.0003323148,0.00013681919],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010022527,0.00045321014,0.00044391994,0.0036095388,0.0013878254,0.0047993194,0.00056297117,0.0012765209,0.1020898],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029541785,0.00014685903,0.00019168592,0.0047729816,0.00288632,0.0029972217,0.0010815535,0.0013326274,0.009335322],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007936997,0.000009859973,0.0001931523,0.00018312859,0.0000035904627,0.000031096297,0.0010274372,0.000109825036,0.000042693766,0.372017,0.60333407,0.023040213],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000035354944,0.000005212888,0.0014813256,0.0005060319,0.00000259256,0.000022526689,0.0007011287,0.00004594156,0.00003355529,0.02548705,0.9717069,0.000004079529],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.044330288,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03733469,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1020898,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008161315,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0017637493,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34152436},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3163571463","doi":"","title":"Hong Kong's Children Proceedings (Parental Responsibility) Bill : Comparative Family Law Reform and Multidisciplinary Collaboration","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian journal of family law","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Multidisciplinary approach; Law; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.02786398686844673,"score_gpt":0.29906628127550855,"score_spread":0.27120229440706184,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3163571463","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.74675703,0.0041277963,0.00041391506,0.074243635,0.00053182634,0.00022533658,0.00030549624,0.000023559433,0.17337146],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.961155,0.001060834,0.00029675078,0.0049877805,0.00005169705,0.00014817325,0.000068630856,0.000006473132,0.032224696],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9943879,0.0021066058,0.00020044242,0.00032783937,0.0007196818,0.0022574605],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99074805,0.003121644,0.00052424305,0.00055763085,0.0013343742,0.0037140471],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008094067,0.00021977289,0.00029707092,0.0015368148,0.015792698,0.008426788,0.0017767467,0.0039080405,0.009496086],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0137402015,0.00041682296,0.000388662,0.0017811201,0.004910886,0.002867797,0.0052872165,0.0031827996,0.00029406702],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00036098826,0.0010127594,0.094881676,0.00027054053,0.00010702876,0.0035115944,0.12903096,0.0012980002,0.0005330547,0.56082255,0.102502316,0.105668545],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00024285889,0.0003708733,0.42075568,0.0009694616,0.00025778683,0.000549157,0.2690593,0.0011246315,0.001201758,0.016398475,0.28893027,0.00013977637],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5144365,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.688033,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5144365,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.032475714,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.11437896,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9768462},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3168805362","doi":"","title":"The Way We Do Things Back Home: Do Expatriate Judges Preferentially Cite the Jurisprudence of Their Home Countries?","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Expatriate; Nationality; Jurisdiction; Law; Jurisprudence; Commonwealth; Political science; Foreign national; State (computer science); Sociology; Immigration","score_opus":0.009298472188995058,"score_gpt":0.24933986991380463,"score_spread":0.2400413977248096,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3168805362","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9616194,0.001322045,0.00089747336,0.005466023,0.00008211856,0.000019436962,0.00003250906,0.000014055101,0.030547025],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9958895,0.0005103146,0.00022998315,0.0012445335,0.000055478133,0.00000983215,0.000020197302,0.000009661087,0.0020305952],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9919471,0.004386154,0.00038062688,0.0009296993,0.0015738556,0.0007824777],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9579254,0.018584587,0.013063843,0.0021114026,0.0058723222,0.002442503],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005612684,0.00013455788,0.00064166525,0.0026874766,0.004447531,0.0067472993,0.0009012527,0.0017782392,0.003895189],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07449411,0.0002271161,0.00016445761,0.003436575,0.0056884284,0.005577434,0.0025525459,0.0016694219,0.0010302514],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00034631987,0.0004039457,0.5706763,0.00027723968,0.00025207092,0.0024798573,0.24919608,0.00023383669,0.0021873137,0.029232139,0.007603315,0.13711154],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013011499,0.0005006661,0.4900705,0.0009649572,0.0002656322,0.003886551,0.38265803,0.0010602095,0.0028419283,0.04641448,0.071053915,0.00015294274],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0073968773,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0158972,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99731255,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011499044,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014376013,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.029683053},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3168928576","doi":"","title":"L’interaction du droit d’auteur avec la sanction des manoeuvres de confusion ou de parasitisme","year":2021,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de propriété intellectuelle","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Intellectual property; Concurrence; Common law; Law; Philosophy","score_opus":0.015473348790219282,"score_gpt":0.2720755309102836,"score_spread":0.2566021821200643,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3168928576","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6422756,0.0012675759,0.0025369502,0.015792305,0.00019901215,0.000070815906,0.00020080921,0.000038145557,0.33761883],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9596854,0.00019193091,0.00023290535,0.00081877597,0.000020914915,0.000011215775,0.0000248286,0.000008095131,0.039006013],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99688333,0.00080789014,0.00007009355,0.00026421613,0.00080096576,0.0011734281],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9935768,0.0010173793,0.0009480928,0.000309682,0.0027249118,0.0014230679],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018546769,0.00018803736,0.00021151193,0.0009557392,0.009567285,0.004242127,0.000771777,0.0012404544,0.0127676],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005429399,0.00017828915,0.00020171223,0.0009557652,0.007865257,0.0010488009,0.002239703,0.0016936009,0.0005856892],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022721982,0.00017864733,0.33870015,0.000215541,0.00011610622,0.0039763083,0.13610478,0.0025948514,0.006142154,0.34274364,0.041268103,0.12773249],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029334598,0.00012540547,0.52884483,0.00047921864,0.00007582846,0.0008105984,0.08990084,0.0016943185,0.0013051757,0.010305424,0.36627692,0.0001521552],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.92584884,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96837664,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92584884,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.031656172,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.027036922,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22968268},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3170429193","doi":"","title":"Equity in the Age of the Internet: Google Inc. v. Equustek Solutions Inc.","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Equity (law); Enforcement; Supreme court; Political science; The Internet; Law; Law and economics; Business; Economics; Computer science","score_opus":0.027105794267258176,"score_gpt":0.31758106199452196,"score_spread":0.2904752677272638,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3170429193","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.114340484,0.006697752,0.002134487,0.29123384,0.0007761408,0.000055037406,0.0003324791,0.00006606574,0.58436364],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.84481394,0.0017111568,0.0005523855,0.092817485,0.0003394549,0.000032528438,0.00007337573,0.000040880506,0.059618752],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9958568,0.000515743,0.00007545389,0.00039064582,0.0016059655,0.0015553295],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980868,0.00088631327,0.00014186617,0.00008494402,0.0004778696,0.00032235964],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025608074,0.000315547,0.0002645966,0.0008766777,0.016090384,0.011137027,0.001440006,0.015450593,0.0038572429],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0070153554,0.00034076298,0.00047309225,0.0016650384,0.009641271,0.006738846,0.0034625593,0.008904017,0.0005468394],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036868645,0.000019383457,0.0024661347,0.000027884771,0.000013016056,0.0013609213,0.019951778,0.0001308253,0.00024797316,0.85266167,0.113710806,0.009372754],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000074604075,0.000032960637,0.011443886,0.0003299778,0.000091860114,0.0010320031,0.030198121,0.0011002288,0.0016107674,0.1160366,0.83783543,0.00021351354],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.810807,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8619568,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.810807,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016887547,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018031653,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3806144},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3172460546","doi":"","title":"A Proposed Transjudicial Approach to s. 15(2)Charter Adjudication","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Dalhousie law journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Adjudication; Charter; Political science; International law; Law; Law and economics; Business; Economics","score_opus":0.019784451617929466,"score_gpt":0.2909947069325724,"score_spread":0.27121025531464293,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3172460546","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.03677035,0.00046069673,0.5583048,0.07059456,0.0025081313,0.0022637676,0.0004925652,0.0007243955,0.32788077],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5483751,0.00022214252,0.3460269,0.021590108,0.0016019656,0.0022129493,0.00020890072,0.00014781945,0.07961416],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.961141,0.016018799,0.0019229527,0.006566527,0.009715018,0.004635755],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97593474,0.008807313,0.0010638231,0.0041136,0.008669966,0.0014106531],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.034875687,0.0007371812,0.0008747931,0.004394312,0.012609515,0.019065747,0.0072452687,0.023788022,0.012118399],"category_scores_gemma":[0.043594897,0.0012468101,0.0023665337,0.0026399135,0.011888302,0.007129579,0.0053987005,0.014312025,0.0024324732],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025364945,0.00008631869,0.00050145376,0.000022645712,0.00002116279,0.00021865459,0.001511926,0.0010691871,0.000450873,0.9712388,0.010557446,0.014296012],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015167693,0.00016514634,0.0017812024,0.00023000152,0.00014456753,0.0005838486,0.0025228672,0.03463294,0.0020783178,0.87451994,0.082995735,0.0001938376],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.025416983,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0541197,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.034875687,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0072015226,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.025220249,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18444246},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3174052708","doi":"","title":"Organized Pseudolegal Commercial Arguments in Canadian Inter-Partner Family Court Disputes","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Meaning (existential); Phenomenon; Government (linguistics); Law; Spouse; Family law; Political science; Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.016288455452285824,"score_gpt":0.3124513646557923,"score_spread":0.2961629092035065,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3174052708","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.47011486,0.010533606,0.0062987613,0.018956758,0.00020799864,0.00013893419,0.00021084743,0.000044826123,0.49349347],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99452245,0.0011687538,0.00048419664,0.00082120585,0.000019473351,0.000017118173,0.000025694235,0.000007793801,0.0029332913],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9885315,0.003063627,0.00030782455,0.0008618777,0.004628076,0.0026070448],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9794103,0.012648548,0.0018846397,0.00079892576,0.00393058,0.0013270875],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0074444287,0.0002994807,0.00042401307,0.004871276,0.029793583,0.014435209,0.0020381876,0.0044848216,0.0049857125],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03144494,0.00037998505,0.0003232281,0.00795184,0.02566852,0.0045187455,0.0053180763,0.0044498416,0.00016735312],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004216676,0.000029723164,0.009442223,0.00013662227,0.00003219285,0.0016177095,0.10390721,0.0009754791,0.00016834999,0.84360933,0.010551387,0.02948762],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007908763,0.000047403846,0.068634525,0.0015420495,0.00013127149,0.0014103642,0.2696322,0.004186631,0.0010246743,0.20329176,0.44977087,0.00024920236],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.90198195,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9453426,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09801805,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.074699186,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.061629158,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.54198307},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3176972755","doi":"10.1080/20414005.2021.1937448","title":"What’s a palace? In search of the vulnerable edifices of transnational sovereignty","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Transnational Legal Theory","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Sovereignty; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Political economy; Criminology; Sociology; Politics","score_opus":0.02216821477597833,"score_gpt":0.3014603085959229,"score_spread":0.2792920938199446,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3176972755","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0006997452,0.029398222,0.0007452174,0.75049347,0.20239337,0.000006482042,0.000032356013,0.000018447789,0.016212642],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.062091805,0.061249766,0.001807579,0.2564036,0.58401036,0.00004981228,0.000089652516,0.00018217134,0.034115337],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963481,0.0018525725,0.00013389309,0.0004969758,0.0008354619,0.00033303257],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97852534,0.017750988,0.00049748394,0.00039697337,0.0019175545,0.00091162353],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0056813504,0.00063718425,0.0010220708,0.0016579948,0.00769109,0.017307976,0.0020461155,0.009965362,0.0057646176],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017337466,0.00027916513,0.00062405766,0.0013768682,0.015998522,0.016343838,0.002659258,0.019194625,0.0013237629],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001794903,0.00001166087,0.00014031697,0.00025671342,0.000012727757,0.00010404705,0.004380317,0.0000502811,0.000074735086,0.24204463,0.74126005,0.011646502],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007423712,0.000013184236,0.00038909735,0.00077943015,0.000014773109,0.0000907926,0.007815791,0.0001963347,0.000112124486,0.1326023,0.8579529,0.000025884923],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036198962,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008900516,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017307976,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034039288,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005600487,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.030046225},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3177270722","doi":"10.7202/1077698ar","title":"L’autorité de la règle de rattachement en droit international privé : regards croisés vietnamo-québécois","year":2021,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.00705301801885037,"score_gpt":0.27713052732720767,"score_spread":0.2700775093083573,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3177270722","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6948412,0.0054881913,0.002866209,0.02428336,0.00029203476,0.00011987071,0.0002789024,0.00002455171,0.2718056],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9051963,0.0017355963,0.00048507552,0.0014944464,0.000029054847,0.00003542825,0.000081723236,0.0000222852,0.090920135],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981183,0.00037277464,0.000048837945,0.00021531632,0.00040936732,0.0008355909],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973062,0.0006615019,0.0003964012,0.00017690817,0.0009287284,0.0005302667],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022382257,0.00021107637,0.0002163843,0.00089220953,0.0059340955,0.0052746697,0.0007781787,0.001396732,0.012462827],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0040994207,0.00024493682,0.0002047135,0.0014516963,0.0059063383,0.0021615895,0.0019057909,0.0024441876,0.00049269234],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010663362,0.00007851199,0.08218135,0.00046584892,0.000051052582,0.0023674893,0.24569961,0.0010440388,0.0028812063,0.5660689,0.023312557,0.07574287],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018944842,0.00011172273,0.120646514,0.0010461069,0.00003955843,0.0007790617,0.25624752,0.00077592186,0.002052341,0.00862091,0.6095651,0.000096316064],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.74398685,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.83510834,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.25601315,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.019265063,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.029624898,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5150417},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3177680402","doi":"","title":"'State Succession to Bits in the Context of the Transfer of Territory of Macao to China: Lessons Learned from the Sanum Saga'.","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"China; Ecological succession; Scope (computer science); Context (archaeology); Convention; State (computer science); Treaty; Political science; Law; Geography; Economy; Computer science; Economics; Archaeology","score_opus":0.026397391564572017,"score_gpt":0.31446669217293377,"score_spread":0.2880693006083618,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3177680402","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.67220366,0.0034787827,0.0035971096,0.042250507,0.00041761817,0.00006517289,0.00005499629,0.000016236992,0.27791592],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9880911,0.00037664367,0.00021290172,0.0014603253,0.000040914958,0.000024131954,0.00001187979,0.0000043886744,0.009777787],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970124,0.0009686172,0.00008285441,0.00035500337,0.00035181185,0.0012292961],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99829286,0.0008077589,0.00021354649,0.0001431328,0.00028309773,0.00025963865],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004378105,0.0002107512,0.00042956191,0.0006424433,0.006992731,0.0057908283,0.001430316,0.0033019718,0.0043747784],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0064874277,0.00020407254,0.00036658274,0.0010320353,0.017072149,0.005069124,0.0068495977,0.0046965666,0.00012614336],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001824655,0.000011879374,0.0032966305,0.0000250721,0.0000070036654,0.0006520625,0.022697754,0.00027083885,0.000095663825,0.9657814,0.0020779516,0.0050654933],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009221463,0.00019374205,0.06185153,0.00058151473,0.00007826818,0.00041346002,0.12099088,0.006497565,0.0015227485,0.5062477,0.3013728,0.00015764956],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1298254,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.22684278,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1298254,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014019885,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014402676,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2581395},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3183751795","doi":"10.3917/rcdip.212.0491","title":"The Elgar Companion to the Hague Conference on Private International Law, par Thomas John, Rishi Gulati et Ben Köhler (dir.), Edward Elgar, 2020, 544 pages","year":2021,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue critique de droit international privé","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law and economics; Law; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.0313685133514739,"score_gpt":0.32643751270842075,"score_spread":0.29506899935694686,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3183751795","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0013482699,0.56163,0.0013306888,0.05026547,0.04622834,0.000053539603,0.001232821,0.00021239561,0.33769846],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.008658357,0.089405544,0.00059245015,0.006366937,0.0062434855,0.00008978571,0.00077647914,0.00024989524,0.88761705],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99877363,0.0002232516,0.00006856546,0.00022164782,0.0005581953,0.00015474603],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99915934,0.00032497384,0.0000990397,0.00007248844,0.0002528496,0.00009123269],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014510342,0.0013069715,0.0009871644,0.0020477148,0.0018904643,0.00858767,0.0012127472,0.0047643096,0.07765005],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029877382,0.00060204533,0.00034032826,0.0038248943,0.0022087903,0.0054199477,0.0022645548,0.0037941635,0.03871011],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014514084,0.000010713859,0.00005628017,0.000134074,0.0000027518827,0.000026008636,0.00014914942,0.00007778886,0.000060473336,0.0102071045,0.95348746,0.03577371],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000019561269,0.0000023664147,0.0002796803,0.00022592681,0.0000010165717,0.000020923339,0.00014324753,0.000018733195,0.000024876312,0.0017747715,0.9975031,0.0000034084885],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02054038,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.036628194,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07765005,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0063175424,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0045782626,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25976527},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3184145648","doi":"","title":"Choice of court agreements: selected common-law jurisdiction and Indian laws compared time for the convention of 30 June 2005 on choice of court agreements?","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"UTAS Research Repository","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Law; Choice of law; Conflict of laws; Political science; Subject-matter jurisdiction; Original jurisdiction; Plaintiff; Common law; Context (archaeology); Exclusive jurisdiction; Business; Geography","score_opus":0.05485866980026198,"score_gpt":0.38492249332431927,"score_spread":0.3300638235240573,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3184145648","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10689821,0.0037292412,0.0093847,0.025568454,0.00036749733,0.000117517586,0.00020186222,0.00007492067,0.8536576],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9578522,0.0010199525,0.0020096998,0.0034647838,0.00015169974,0.00008068831,0.000062031526,0.00004544621,0.03531337],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9900052,0.0026077523,0.00045274905,0.0015363746,0.0025940926,0.0028038186],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9884935,0.006281811,0.0016239203,0.0012449758,0.0015745026,0.0007812876],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007236404,0.00023228828,0.00055307825,0.0028835752,0.009494112,0.018735452,0.0028744503,0.0035198876,0.012076741],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018478114,0.0003748076,0.0008945671,0.005292162,0.0146077685,0.009154056,0.0052250186,0.008906454,0.0007753544],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000045824254,0.000009010059,0.00034823662,0.000009370159,0.000002053872,0.000023598803,0.0019577572,0.00004218713,0.00003839329,0.9941801,0.0010866415,0.0022980934],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000047971058,0.000080977225,0.018163605,0.00070651586,0.000113312584,0.00034364764,0.019065559,0.0027478298,0.0013992204,0.62998474,0.32717168,0.00017496519],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09392113,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.091646105,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09392113,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015291542,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010383717,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18674886},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3184396697","doi":"","title":"Regulation of Contracts in Canadian Private International Law [Article]","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"UA Campus Repository (The University of Arizona)","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Business; Conflict of laws; Private law; Law and economics; Political science; Public law; Economics","score_opus":0.004917646907167414,"score_gpt":0.2031746976194812,"score_spread":0.19825705071231378,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3184396697","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.036002282,0.0017556112,0.0026710161,0.015152379,0.0001888322,0.000111664485,0.00035956918,0.00006596145,0.9436927],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.823436,0.0017519642,0.0022555161,0.002927261,0.0001267006,0.00006911262,0.0001961193,0.000059073223,0.16917817],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99371135,0.0006511664,0.00014591501,0.00047499512,0.0031167492,0.001899804],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996018,0.0009797973,0.00019032088,0.00032021338,0.0020112027,0.0004804351],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003180043,0.00034618413,0.00031476337,0.002421985,0.016352028,0.010053238,0.0018603986,0.0039585233,0.017666794],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011446465,0.0004765225,0.0004338074,0.0037669113,0.009180338,0.002385652,0.0024418891,0.0022965248,0.0006902418],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000072671146,0.000010647681,0.0007039178,0.0000169793,0.0000029840023,0.000049231465,0.0017329715,0.00041395973,0.000096035255,0.9720605,0.018091299,0.0068140836],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000049443057,0.00003245683,0.01659062,0.0003792144,0.00006011263,0.00020024575,0.0065145637,0.0072439667,0.00062083604,0.23349142,0.73467475,0.00014231082],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9748848,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98102474,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09914167,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09914167,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14411514,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.71932656},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3186550581","doi":"10.17159/obiter.v39i3.11328","title":"CONTRACTUAL CAPACITY AND THE CONFLICT OF LAWS IN COMMON-LAW JURISDICTIONS (PART 1): THE UNITED KINGDOM","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Obiter","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Jurisdiction; Conflict of laws; Common law; Comparative law; Political science; Civil law (Civil law); Private law; Choice of law; Position (finance); Municipal law; Public law; Business","score_opus":0.07260518125190656,"score_gpt":0.3266917376229886,"score_spread":0.254086556371082,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3186550581","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19916998,0.13606855,0.0040152627,0.024366023,0.000636041,0.00006733592,0.00009368041,0.00001519265,0.63556784],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98338103,0.008584463,0.00052530546,0.0012011422,0.00004661298,0.000030514222,0.000024003617,0.0000061766145,0.006200698],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9942596,0.0030609507,0.00043384352,0.00030707702,0.0008845711,0.0010539853],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99583876,0.002350282,0.00076944445,0.00028571888,0.00053484243,0.00022090126],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024454973,0.00017940083,0.0003179377,0.0017126577,0.004589178,0.008761553,0.00065768405,0.0027938439,0.003758301],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007032683,0.00022947126,0.000292709,0.0026220107,0.010860172,0.0058470387,0.0045015947,0.001869301,0.000267579],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019337733,0.0000105671,0.0014598056,0.00015286388,0.000007779113,0.00027307984,0.020873962,0.00020839687,0.000104608014,0.96373296,0.0028598825,0.01029678],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000033191864,0.00010363258,0.025933249,0.0035225751,0.000037461,0.0019687973,0.08690159,0.0008395829,0.0007029509,0.17633945,0.70351475,0.00010281767],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.061126575,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.058210947,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.061126575,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00822825,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036911534,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12154156},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3186962189","doi":"10.3917/rcdip.212.0361","title":"La réforme du droit de l’adoption internationale en Allemagne","year":2021,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue critique de droit international privé","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Conflict of laws; Legislature; Private law; Comparative law; German; Public law; Substantive law; Criticism; Law reform; Constitutional law; Municipal law","score_opus":0.015396704174468883,"score_gpt":0.2970802576611876,"score_spread":0.28168355348671875,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3186962189","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06432255,0.005870284,0.022815831,0.076425955,0.0017892241,0.00023172585,0.0002822008,0.00029063158,0.8279716],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5363314,0.0041022105,0.010308654,0.025164189,0.0006722558,0.00044804532,0.00027730476,0.00017992788,0.42251608],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99337935,0.0019573877,0.00019624222,0.0011078347,0.0019869774,0.0013722007],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958812,0.0012963584,0.0004694206,0.00085502444,0.0010728019,0.00042514733],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0066274684,0.0005044845,0.00039105036,0.000957928,0.0029479335,0.0058052093,0.001514503,0.003926378,0.013854186],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0110496385,0.00045995257,0.0007951444,0.0010427947,0.0053660003,0.005139599,0.0034277125,0.0065899715,0.0021087595],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030102485,0.000036385885,0.001135231,0.00007198945,0.000011505544,0.000087279375,0.0021825247,0.00030880873,0.00064610766,0.9656545,0.012893938,0.016941603],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003394568,0.000099629266,0.0072127446,0.00031151596,0.000028533814,0.000108496126,0.0011725536,0.0005532192,0.0011662876,0.04960232,0.9396618,0.000048835085],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.050510902,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.053610105,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.050510902,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010610701,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015406135,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10043383},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3191512495","doi":"","title":"Privacy, Eh! The Impact of Canada's Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act on Transnational Business","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment & Technology Law","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Internet privacy; Personally identifiable information; Business; Information privacy; Data Protection Act 1998; Electronic surveillance; Privacy protection; Privacy policy; Business information; Public relations; Computer security; Political science; Computer science; Marketing","score_opus":0.009539611023522526,"score_gpt":0.2509941445194883,"score_spread":0.2414545334959658,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3191512495","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06297048,0.0041476833,0.00083971646,0.22660883,0.00077300007,0.00006798351,0.001550012,0.00007786918,0.7029644],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6073608,0.0034973382,0.00076963234,0.07906719,0.00034424587,0.000065980894,0.00028524591,0.000081209684,0.3085283],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99246985,0.00058943144,0.00012678008,0.0004027983,0.0033701323,0.003041061],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9922869,0.0027305589,0.00035841294,0.00040661293,0.0030668133,0.001150665],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032109807,0.0003002775,0.00036191253,0.0014404538,0.019455867,0.018283783,0.0015354968,0.011160988,0.021080375],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016772918,0.0005805046,0.00064682565,0.0023984336,0.010992162,0.0051208856,0.0036364738,0.009980031,0.0012799321],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008421003,0.00004870566,0.005456841,0.000059286907,0.000024143792,0.00029792273,0.006267424,0.0003665641,0.0003707125,0.80623823,0.16429088,0.016495079],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006860269,0.000051240506,0.036644794,0.00054296816,0.00015052209,0.00019075815,0.020129716,0.001109848,0.0013098462,0.07140478,0.868239,0.00015800234],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9867003,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9917753,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.054565832,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.054565832,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1303004,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.39590466},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3192949206","doi":"","title":"Comparative Analysis of Unitary Authorities in the UK, Canada and New Zealand","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Korean Society and Public Administration","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Unitary state; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.04051871764160269,"score_gpt":0.3098881204086471,"score_spread":0.2693694027670444,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3192949206","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9915011,0.000573196,0.000052817344,0.00024327975,0.000005696108,0.000017455059,0.00014587231,0.0000026525438,0.0074579613],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99864167,0.00023457302,0.00003736251,0.000025735832,0.0000013873307,0.0000050196913,0.00007812485,0.0000021694768,0.00097396533],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967867,0.00050074636,0.00015735855,0.00017140113,0.0007638383,0.0016199693],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9917983,0.0014262225,0.001286474,0.00018479904,0.0038056981,0.001498444],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012369604,0.00015686924,0.0005860251,0.0052801915,0.0049951053,0.0030692897,0.00094681635,0.0005201106,0.005302282],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010118092,0.00026666417,0.00044644385,0.012658696,0.0032467626,0.0013230388,0.0024075462,0.0008834532,0.00028607898],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00073061784,0.00021198716,0.8081788,0.0003500702,0.00024407162,0.0022556526,0.09781178,0.0013052912,0.00080473156,0.04406671,0.0037584265,0.04028195],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011040671,0.00005094387,0.91935843,0.00007379435,0.0000613361,0.000101795704,0.07449008,0.00029595284,0.0000818376,0.000319662,0.005135942,0.00001923877],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9572106,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98821265,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0427894,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0378612,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02991897,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2747035},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3194409652","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198868958.003.0003","title":"The Distant Shore: Discretion and the Extent of Judicial Jurisdiction","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Law; Club; Discretion; Shore; Subject (documents); Political science","score_opus":0.016508602960436786,"score_gpt":0.22936025309351019,"score_spread":0.2128516501330734,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3194409652","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17152879,0.0075776298,0.01298906,0.01626773,0.00019161201,0.000033683857,0.000050462608,0.00003958223,0.79132146],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98797244,0.0005669134,0.0005813456,0.0009639968,0.00007444645,0.00001818996,0.000014580264,0.000020106741,0.009788013],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9880326,0.0052481233,0.00048753488,0.0013488898,0.0030971742,0.0017857485],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98965305,0.0069590947,0.0006676483,0.0010689861,0.0007861448,0.0008650708],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007105226,0.00020019471,0.00062856264,0.0016920093,0.007885801,0.01149295,0.0015519632,0.0030792172,0.0046585137],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018729383,0.00046226947,0.00036923605,0.0016175691,0.041221093,0.008514132,0.010665238,0.006031558,0.00057862373],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009862753,0.000007269079,0.00077242585,0.000016920032,0.0000044891035,0.00010639916,0.0076927473,0.00018352277,0.00016386225,0.98428303,0.0009577262,0.0058018025],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029999392,0.00003286115,0.0037487424,0.00029428763,0.000015466563,0.00015204583,0.009293179,0.0005865694,0.00020122678,0.92960083,0.05601623,0.000028492517],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0148862535,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.025905982,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0148862535,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005672562,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0058970335,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.041157484},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3195987185","doi":"","title":"Global Trends in Mediation, Second Edition","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mediation; Salient; Alternative dispute resolution; Perspective (graphical); Political science; Dispute resolution; Table (database); Lawyer supported mediation; Table of contents; Law; Regional science; Sociology; Dispute mechanism; Computer science; Data mining; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.0055187686675281945,"score_gpt":0.2712215027718405,"score_spread":0.2657027341043123,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3195987185","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000877102,0.22428705,0.0022472106,0.04870379,0.043630276,0.000056898763,0.0031187586,0.0007586104,0.6763202],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.013955971,0.13205357,0.0025193188,0.013723731,0.014126837,0.00015679974,0.003848692,0.0007663737,0.8188488],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992447,0.000107199805,0.000048978553,0.000095237345,0.00041539094,0.00008857173],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989329,0.00027001242,0.00006940791,0.000110642024,0.00050464645,0.00011231334],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009855813,0.0008984772,0.000606649,0.0025696727,0.0012789394,0.006324542,0.0010339391,0.001770207,0.06850369],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003518249,0.0003830558,0.000534338,0.0043045287,0.0015429219,0.0042481557,0.001808646,0.0033187114,0.023227954],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006029066,0.000009271147,0.000102383776,0.00010658531,0.0000032800447,0.000022157486,0.0002244553,0.000116295836,0.00005346433,0.031194657,0.9339815,0.034179904],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000010620274,0.0000023244556,0.00019347091,0.000106022315,0.0000010666204,0.000023232313,0.0000826805,0.00001822435,0.000011497857,0.003764351,0.99579394,0.000001992179],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019955788,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.025868706,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06850369,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0041273227,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0055349497,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2291677},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3197683296","doi":"10.29173/mlj795","title":"Legal Research in Canada's Provincial Appellate Courts","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law","score_opus":0.09364104594505025,"score_gpt":0.3204198856045571,"score_spread":0.22677883965950685,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3197683296","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6802141,0.014262617,0.0010073622,0.1270956,0.00051221484,0.00051846326,0.0032993348,0.00007024303,0.17302005],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9506634,0.004193425,0.0015262973,0.009659988,0.00008944871,0.00013212001,0.0004495382,0.00002701394,0.033258785],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9873002,0.0023923283,0.000502743,0.0007544555,0.0044534956,0.004596703],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.91417724,0.024505477,0.0035444617,0.0015309884,0.04286027,0.01338166],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012720342,0.00029949012,0.00079694256,0.0070859734,0.03834704,0.015820596,0.0040995106,0.0043126745,0.009506519],"category_scores_gemma":[0.047112294,0.0009701614,0.00057042635,0.013670684,0.00883621,0.0029793682,0.0037382764,0.0048880167,0.00044301042],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00046907063,0.0004974969,0.2781111,0.00097086834,0.00024931596,0.0014477834,0.0755363,0.002614717,0.0011118387,0.41909373,0.12234928,0.09754843],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023844518,0.0002234862,0.48217818,0.0024714053,0.0003640673,0.00031341624,0.17067128,0.0047079963,0.0016137087,0.031757414,0.30518872,0.0002718432],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99820876,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9995503,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6874155,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.31258452,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.6330172,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7973045},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3200511077","doi":"","title":"146 Cong. Rec. 3040 - TRIBUTE TO MICHAEL S. McGILL","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"govinfo.gov","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tribute; Art; Art history","score_opus":0.01671313624895357,"score_gpt":0.30000338478977606,"score_spread":0.2832902485408225,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3200511077","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0029407886,0.0098022595,0.0006791442,0.089091904,0.003345174,0.00030698258,0.011671931,0.00040027307,0.8817615],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.024277864,0.0026090825,0.0006110721,0.13249923,0.0010556879,0.0009975815,0.0026476965,0.00021840393,0.83508337],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966529,0.00038625408,0.000081676815,0.0003706397,0.0014402962,0.0010682151],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99707806,0.0011847625,0.00012100617,0.00015546511,0.0011736349,0.00028713333],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021453358,0.0016454197,0.0013636838,0.002460918,0.008123768,0.004948392,0.0039093494,0.016846737,0.09718959],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011962467,0.0020161816,0.0010736268,0.0027194603,0.002415604,0.0023372932,0.0031000357,0.01011559,0.05041485],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003257939,0.000016128675,0.0003919349,0.000038540762,0.000009138019,0.00009644305,0.00019590821,0.00006371342,0.00013927696,0.016169505,0.9785044,0.004342376],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004386264,0.00001803365,0.0036505486,0.00026987641,0.000030721152,0.00007406987,0.00023947883,0.0001637625,0.00016017105,0.0046932213,0.9906193,0.000036940768],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.47152218,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.68858624,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.47152218,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009270426,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01247937,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.93755525},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3202452705","doi":"10.1080/17441048.2021.1958482","title":"Characterisation and liberative prescription (the limitation of actions) in private international law – Canadian doctrine in the Eswatini courts (the phenomenon of dual cumulation)","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Private International Law","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Doctrine; Supreme court; Phenomenon; Law; Conflict of laws; Dual (grammatical number); Political science; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.036954648326038356,"score_gpt":0.31738019525574357,"score_spread":0.2804255469297052,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3202452705","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06551269,0.0015429831,0.010285283,0.01583855,0.00018863395,0.00011205199,0.00010145398,0.000027034343,0.9063913],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9333347,0.0011235644,0.0036199612,0.0022187303,0.000104009436,0.000095492134,0.000028961676,0.000021149668,0.059453372],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99518186,0.0009044427,0.00015504728,0.00057173794,0.0020625747,0.0011242765],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983535,0.00056932896,0.00016140188,0.00020532857,0.00054178655,0.00016878209],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002526107,0.00039249146,0.00030524997,0.0014884184,0.010215037,0.008587138,0.00085968705,0.003130428,0.003276894],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00606845,0.00031219763,0.00026097003,0.00186719,0.02450115,0.004818269,0.004259921,0.00447706,0.00025968606],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002446338,0.0000015231145,0.00007878436,0.0000053855915,5.046494e-7,0.000033583867,0.0027825176,0.000030764022,0.0000736738,0.99475455,0.0005945396,0.0016417276],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027861508,0.00003161754,0.004126295,0.00030883367,0.0000296987,0.00057694316,0.013242487,0.0018471294,0.0017326503,0.5932803,0.384693,0.00010318787],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4698988,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.52457386,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5301012,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.019963197,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.023193132,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.93432736},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3203035535","doi":"","title":"Contractual governance in ‘a world of broad regions’","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Corporate governance; Business; Computer science; Finance","score_opus":0.018752859348815806,"score_gpt":0.2674813241001151,"score_spread":0.24872846475129928,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3203035535","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3394471,0.0066217408,0.054857396,0.082726136,0.00041352052,0.00010292098,0.00018831939,0.00008908784,0.5155538],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98757577,0.0003402744,0.0023723997,0.0013893022,0.00007110703,0.000032600066,0.00002843496,0.000014410809,0.00817561],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9910171,0.0058716764,0.00019408869,0.00091519003,0.0008994972,0.001102398],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9920094,0.00436027,0.00072890014,0.0009186716,0.0009835869,0.0009991515],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009612148,0.00016461969,0.00051954924,0.0008894281,0.0055042864,0.010240058,0.0012492893,0.0032698184,0.0076157595],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015297286,0.00030984243,0.00031779226,0.0025494255,0.021191703,0.00680886,0.00503377,0.0023092434,0.00039833097],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000057596194,0.000003646416,0.00021073951,0.000008696409,0.000004712953,0.00004108052,0.002665663,0.00040896155,0.000049450686,0.9938876,0.0010360208,0.0016776547],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023031565,0.0000130386725,0.001957315,0.000074236064,0.0000071677455,0.000077495046,0.006474966,0.0013540031,0.00006693787,0.90424126,0.085692145,0.000018475557],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024562174,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.023409914,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024562174,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00766438,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0067448914,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.055609226},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3203512638","doi":"","title":"New romanian choice-of-law rules on marriage effects","year":2012,"lang":"ro","type":"article","venue":"Analele Științifice ale Universităţii Alexandru Ioan Cuza din Iași, seria Ştiinţe Juridice","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Romanian; Law; Choice of law; Private law; Civil code; Political science; Paragraph; Conflict of laws; Jurisdiction; Civil law (Civil law); Comparative law; Public law; Municipal law; Settlement (finance); Sociology; Economics","score_opus":0.022262466043608747,"score_gpt":0.28105062847050005,"score_spread":0.2587881624268913,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3203512638","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06950999,0.0021082084,0.087796874,0.0054539125,0.00068818644,0.00039426188,0.0008738052,0.00012423238,0.83305055],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8732068,0.0015603845,0.05509586,0.0031136537,0.0006248402,0.00097584183,0.0003541715,0.00015403659,0.064914346],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.988982,0.002976008,0.0011743576,0.0019151765,0.0039532743,0.0009991477],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9929524,0.0031942972,0.0005309923,0.0015502197,0.0015332596,0.00023878503],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007223662,0.00036711188,0.00081703276,0.0012529726,0.0024193148,0.004196784,0.0016073106,0.0018216617,0.007977014],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018976154,0.000591287,0.0010490213,0.0009617162,0.009561069,0.003029325,0.0030962508,0.006368903,0.0013848974],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014880939,0.000015744588,0.00033809512,0.000021724567,0.000005331344,0.00003999,0.00036062964,0.0004275892,0.00016182919,0.99245787,0.0018452968,0.004311029],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012860507,0.00010532568,0.0047528977,0.00022368817,0.00005147964,0.00029425643,0.00041377638,0.0033245478,0.0020685536,0.83196974,0.15655039,0.00011668878],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009397458,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010681028,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009397458,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0039179637,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035321151,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03820288},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W320397684","doi":"","title":"A Rational Thinking of the People's Mediation System of China/UNE PENSEE RATIONNELLE DU SYSTEME DE LA MEDIATION POPULAIRE DE CHINE","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian social science","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mediation; Political science; China; Humanities; Alternative dispute resolution; Social harmony; Sociology; Welfare economics; Law; Philosophy; Economics; Social science","score_opus":0.006671650982445831,"score_gpt":0.2511180785501751,"score_spread":0.24444642756772927,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W320397684","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5733278,0.0010140843,0.08588851,0.01945941,0.00013906781,0.00055655563,0.00018787077,0.00012908131,0.31929767],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98756194,0.00009743952,0.0057361424,0.00014860685,0.000016812028,0.000068503934,0.000022454453,0.000005496417,0.006342561],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99608386,0.0019627186,0.00016490818,0.0004905613,0.0007544833,0.0005433844],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99860626,0.0004432338,0.00020314447,0.00022053983,0.0003688036,0.00015814662],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005366003,0.0003574784,0.00032767924,0.0018121161,0.003941133,0.00572395,0.0012176532,0.0016042534,0.007366913],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0037702322,0.00024344468,0.0007917831,0.0010928941,0.013193873,0.0038859101,0.002233764,0.0013426552,0.00026121348],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009355572,0.000010372507,0.0011940915,0.000018925397,0.000012197453,0.0001435542,0.0042605344,0.0019771082,0.00026616102,0.98937666,0.0004708115,0.0022603264],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011469557,0.00008386731,0.0070048706,0.00012718268,0.00007334302,0.00020711187,0.013618755,0.048921227,0.001099967,0.8843747,0.044288255,0.00008602033],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.045945086,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01922264,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.045945086,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012712984,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009639359,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09223962},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3204000247","doi":"","title":"The Canadian Supreme Court of British Columbia certifies a class action subject to a requirement for the plaintiff to redraft pleadings to conform to several key court holdings (MasterCard / Visa / Watson / Bank of America)","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"e-Competitions Bulletin","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Plaintiff; Supreme court; Class action; Law; Political science; Subject (documents); Business; Computer science; State (computer science); Library science","score_opus":0.02332223736837245,"score_gpt":0.2742732645562077,"score_spread":0.25095102718783524,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3204000247","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.033965155,0.0013878312,0.0012597,0.07102533,0.004258301,0.0004733657,0.007550017,0.0003863266,0.879694],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.08536328,0.0006332061,0.0012780286,0.024244241,0.00020814346,0.000120606725,0.0012622909,0.00009262835,0.88679755],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9948597,0.00018736593,0.00016903935,0.00036960375,0.0026214933,0.0017929302],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99450076,0.00080205343,0.0001151392,0.00018227982,0.0035534014,0.00084637007],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022441992,0.0005463054,0.0006026403,0.0017260319,0.02118242,0.0073820762,0.0019890366,0.008178579,0.033567887],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0075914185,0.0012318926,0.00083008455,0.0015109127,0.0027933563,0.0010938873,0.0013403146,0.008695619,0.0049807834],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004837634,0.000063833875,0.003994544,0.000050456747,0.000026262307,0.0002793067,0.0007674525,0.00022618992,0.0007658002,0.0804903,0.8993663,0.013921163],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004275154,0.000024189823,0.019248147,0.00010658983,0.00005026815,0.000054688404,0.0014319762,0.00058290805,0.0010255665,0.0036784294,0.97363484,0.000119748714],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9867411,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99704415,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04647229,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04647229,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14578806,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33718163},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3205219429","doi":"","title":"Revisiting the Double Actionability Rule in Singapore: Time for a Change","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Criticism; Law; Rule of law; Political science; Subject (documents); Common law; Law and economics; Sociology; Computer science","score_opus":0.03274959011869361,"score_gpt":0.32676646133365256,"score_spread":0.29401687121495895,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3205219429","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.058033988,0.017320937,0.007026794,0.8172989,0.008175568,0.000052824656,0.0002709573,0.000088235814,0.09173176],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6481105,0.022722334,0.010034005,0.26080483,0.0032082903,0.0000878875,0.0002450435,0.00019204836,0.05459502],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99139893,0.0023832768,0.0012018937,0.0011683259,0.002944585,0.00090296596],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98581034,0.005294814,0.001092185,0.0015906603,0.0048705456,0.0013415196],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013974233,0.00048491123,0.0010544051,0.0010367814,0.0048201787,0.01038476,0.0023028497,0.008382915,0.0068407934],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019435588,0.0004082546,0.001075216,0.0015549066,0.015424703,0.015243546,0.006145479,0.021240292,0.0015597065],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026168273,0.000049122256,0.0018983273,0.0001854477,0.000018493896,0.0010438827,0.005440461,0.00046369422,0.00046446078,0.9052234,0.04589483,0.03929165],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000037067355,0.00012310606,0.004706852,0.001207239,0.00003397637,0.00076850806,0.009447147,0.0013697798,0.0011585444,0.26169533,0.7192682,0.00018427438],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09807675,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14145438,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09807675,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013775424,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.028218057,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1950118},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3207233330","doi":"","title":"International Comity and the Construction of the Charter's Limits: Hape Revisited","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Comity; Law; Political science; Jurisdiction; International law; Jurisprudence; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.005612957396643109,"score_gpt":0.2450747189055387,"score_spread":0.2394617615088956,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3207233330","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.044481985,0.003516208,0.014304056,0.028228633,0.00044454416,0.00008335922,0.00007251048,0.000086549204,0.90878224],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9442838,0.0011717493,0.0022367474,0.0070494395,0.00022787736,0.00007134124,0.000035949513,0.000047076486,0.04487612],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9925559,0.0012047011,0.00014661287,0.0010920034,0.0026499687,0.002350901],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99633706,0.0017716001,0.00017730046,0.0003733316,0.0010001692,0.0003404545],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005292857,0.00047018865,0.00070833426,0.0020701431,0.012841218,0.017098423,0.0026265027,0.006275196,0.005701889],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010156351,0.0005221054,0.00075822626,0.0019291496,0.049321666,0.007899418,0.0071835076,0.013414068,0.0003358872],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000015473502,0.0000019095762,0.000071380775,0.000004973318,0.0000011685672,0.0000564941,0.0009358769,0.00007147751,0.000014707011,0.9967501,0.00076655886,0.0013238975],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000031386684,0.000025246454,0.0023511422,0.0002728477,0.000033091026,0.00032002514,0.010191077,0.0015793045,0.00077864557,0.71295476,0.2713663,0.000096186246],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.61765736,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5637898,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.61765736,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.034615267,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.036772996,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.76918864},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3208203523","doi":"","title":"International Negotiable Instruments (Introduction)","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Negotiable instrument; Scope (computer science); Law; Statute; Business; Political science; Law and economics; Computer science; Economics","score_opus":0.011761471826403323,"score_gpt":0.26615372621622424,"score_spread":0.25439225438982094,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3208203523","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0003417077,0.01308271,0.0024851372,0.0040579415,0.002239059,0.000056747594,0.00033946944,0.00012401293,0.97727317],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.024686981,0.02018967,0.0047612227,0.005497337,0.0026765142,0.00027252137,0.0009256254,0.00030879362,0.9406814],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99840975,0.00034680788,0.00008982125,0.00028833732,0.00062596396,0.00023928408],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99938905,0.00021618484,0.00005141686,0.00012037124,0.00016078552,0.00006209508],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011155242,0.0010178181,0.00054686,0.0017707708,0.002486072,0.009394263,0.0015879854,0.0036761467,0.103856124],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0032064235,0.0005410523,0.00070305326,0.0025022787,0.003238876,0.007856123,0.004102128,0.0053744465,0.046485763],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008462171,0.00001756045,0.00006395308,0.00009714865,0.0000025682527,0.00006074192,0.00050625484,0.00019057571,0.00007081161,0.73348737,0.23357064,0.031923942],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000014983061,0.000004907947,0.00006652378,0.00013307974,8.538923e-7,0.000050302497,0.000099925,0.000052031497,0.000023498573,0.030204006,0.96936035,0.000002970811],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035088598,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003941438,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.103856124,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037467212,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002800168,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34743333},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3208426249","doi":"","title":"The Ottawa Convention and its role in settling international lease finance contract disputes","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Basic Education College Magazine For Educational and Humanities Sciences","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Lease; Convention; Business; Finance; Law; Law and economics; Economics; Political science","score_opus":0.03248245415034241,"score_gpt":0.3081284826120781,"score_spread":0.2756460284617357,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3208426249","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05564704,0.009706319,0.0022580829,0.1585596,0.003142719,0.000108348075,0.00037773993,0.000084368294,0.77011573],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6889591,0.0037468448,0.003524121,0.02684362,0.0007934662,0.00017663473,0.000104837214,0.00018883878,0.2756626],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9834221,0.0037461752,0.001147141,0.0016108042,0.0045605404,0.0055132913],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.977425,0.0118323015,0.0013457657,0.0015862001,0.0055524884,0.0022583453],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013109564,0.00057259435,0.0010003867,0.0027987864,0.036000017,0.04084047,0.0032439556,0.020083345,0.012461759],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04277228,0.0016685217,0.0008840069,0.0039488114,0.026719743,0.00994174,0.0061903843,0.021841517,0.0014128274],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007931658,0.00004120427,0.0017911253,0.000046912424,0.000025776244,0.00022381477,0.0059463927,0.00050198747,0.0002024377,0.9214242,0.060707774,0.009009068],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007094691,0.000056805773,0.0144086275,0.00071706955,0.00011565193,0.00018909868,0.019112686,0.0014743588,0.0010271909,0.15223229,0.8100601,0.0005352541],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.850131,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9334416,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.850131,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.061368395,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.093887076,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.44526094},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W3211474663","doi":"","title":"University of New Brunswick Law Journal","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of New Brunswick Law Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":125,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.029468113813380343,"score_gpt":0.24319566050455477,"score_spread":0.2137275466911744,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W3211474663","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0056615784,0.03272503,0.00032666422,0.15412527,0.0059515284,0.00017881654,0.0016458567,0.000097332,0.7992879],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.045932796,0.023400225,0.0010242066,0.024967821,0.0015850202,0.00019772728,0.0008014548,0.00013141865,0.90195936],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99685764,0.00038122304,0.0003423859,0.00034642118,0.0013400866,0.000732208],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9923193,0.0023552298,0.00043896976,0.00052046386,0.0030681072,0.001297914],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026123207,0.00082612265,0.0007854017,0.0040027658,0.014217706,0.02023257,0.0020178056,0.007845018,0.08917287],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012140282,0.0016521197,0.0005775124,0.0052101687,0.0060939016,0.00460165,0.0038813374,0.010174219,0.012254503],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020772799,0.00005424143,0.0021725707,0.00021617861,0.000029587914,0.00080920337,0.001696037,0.00015016872,0.000257579,0.14687032,0.81868327,0.029040163],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000084207995,0.00000295568,0.0028921776,0.00042293366,0.000013531914,0.00007022887,0.0017987662,0.00006305604,0.00011035746,0.00546084,0.98912585,0.00003097312],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.76566315,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9382501,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.76566315,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04512054,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08899627,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47143382},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W334472714","doi":"","title":"The Chinese Legal System: Globalization and Local Legal Culture","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":138,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Legal research; Legal culture; Political science; Law; Legal profession; China; Human rights; Legal realism; Globalization; Context (archaeology); Law and economics; Sociology; Geography","score_opus":0.007253728114567884,"score_gpt":0.2596272134548995,"score_spread":0.2523734853403316,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W334472714","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22718641,0.019010626,0.0007136379,0.02977653,0.00026999068,0.0000549824,0.00009322934,0.000032162465,0.7228625],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94295925,0.00901957,0.0002633176,0.0011834239,0.00013004534,0.00004292573,0.000048243,0.000010460958,0.04634273],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996427,0.00012077025,0.000010469306,0.000033561068,0.00010311002,0.00008931176],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99975544,0.000059249694,0.00003480646,0.000019428107,0.00006110554,0.00006994842],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006851563,0.00026612473,0.00017322028,0.0010953685,0.0042691366,0.0035271537,0.00054900727,0.0004433076,0.0040031876],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007710893,0.000100034806,0.00010847955,0.0027948883,0.008500996,0.0023836314,0.0014735226,0.0009163573,0.00018512139],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010813327,0.000024876783,0.0052732327,0.00011463265,0.000007592455,0.000407966,0.07769303,0.00041342937,0.00016624849,0.85283935,0.019353021,0.043695744],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000035426783,0.00009466198,0.08140577,0.0008912151,0.00004817592,0.0005204034,0.114195116,0.0026899867,0.0004700827,0.23796286,0.5616272,0.000059151695],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1178356,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15908083,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1178356,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01235907,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008472348,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23429948},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W338844312","doi":"","title":"Lessons for the Hague: Internet Jurisdiction in Contract and Tort Cases in the European Community and the United States, 23 J. Marshall J. Computer & Info. L. 1 (2004)","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"UIC Law Open Access Repository (University of Illinois at Chicago)","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Tort; Political science; Law; The Internet; Conflict of laws; Computer science; Liability","score_opus":0.04574332797324318,"score_gpt":0.31074261406364556,"score_spread":0.26499928609040235,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W338844312","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.056030408,0.087658316,0.0027099894,0.508396,0.0031486086,0.00012158773,0.00024044153,0.000051056926,0.34164363],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7821484,0.026154181,0.0024234494,0.15216778,0.0018382502,0.0003386111,0.0002030368,0.00006120994,0.034665197],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9844698,0.0071192966,0.0006894974,0.0012148435,0.0028907852,0.0036158583],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9573583,0.035609376,0.0012110597,0.00079498865,0.0031664309,0.0018598383],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.026698204,0.000808173,0.0011402463,0.0063494695,0.0277257,0.034408487,0.0064121303,0.050996546,0.0077336207],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05072854,0.0010519841,0.0016679134,0.007104571,0.038743492,0.039916065,0.012859902,0.016673043,0.00073980907],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036903642,0.00009108887,0.0020847577,0.00008087145,0.00001654016,0.0007831071,0.013470719,0.00031996294,0.00002136432,0.9014597,0.06771016,0.013924879],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00016786526,0.00006916621,0.007561794,0.002963949,0.00011042078,0.00065022043,0.115096085,0.0015170766,0.00021857479,0.5928442,0.278586,0.00021475527],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.33723614,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4479377,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.33723614,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.023963695,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.040779214,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6705464},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W368303738","doi":"","title":"Family law arbitration in Canada","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Carswell eBooks","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Arbitration; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.023305016297701854,"score_gpt":0.2454259611486881,"score_spread":0.22212094485098624,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W368303738","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018700987,0.021631159,0.0025785386,0.0420211,0.0011117301,0.00010056622,0.0003185845,0.00007356206,0.9134638],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.37644225,0.014138275,0.0027470014,0.0064772195,0.000253739,0.00010181489,0.00016438571,0.0001068195,0.5995685],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99563867,0.0004760676,0.00010436371,0.0003734312,0.0016109821,0.0017966045],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977849,0.0005589938,0.00006269593,0.00007399295,0.0011055393,0.0004138796],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025862015,0.00048314992,0.0007632523,0.0022119053,0.02460698,0.009433295,0.0029004745,0.0049395533,0.02270927],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008130752,0.000685653,0.0005657271,0.005060315,0.0067116157,0.0022804888,0.0028090684,0.0048848675,0.0011126131],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013111906,0.000019083043,0.0010676204,0.000041660973,0.000010303359,0.00029397203,0.0040790318,0.00091782806,0.000040541567,0.8320924,0.1237505,0.037673987],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023166062,0.000013605772,0.004427692,0.00040480235,0.000029478293,0.00020489427,0.009365597,0.0024822194,0.00017251688,0.09896012,0.88383764,0.000078308134],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99397427,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9969644,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13065094,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13065094,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.25463042,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.94794333},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W369612255","doi":"10.5287/ora-kky0xak7k","title":"The constitution of Canada and the conflict of laws","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Royal Bank of Canada; Drexel University","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Law; Political science; Constitution; Judicial review; Adjudication; Economic Justice; Judicial independence; Politics","score_opus":0.012622205939634515,"score_gpt":0.28352127929154747,"score_spread":0.27089907335191293,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W369612255","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018790442,0.017011968,0.0044749742,0.05549196,0.0009664211,0.00011170584,0.00068817975,0.00009327145,0.9023711],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8465003,0.011837281,0.005782354,0.016697876,0.00039733978,0.00016331927,0.00048999966,0.00012276984,0.11800879],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9921143,0.0010338771,0.00018335936,0.0006539426,0.0032350873,0.002779395],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99620336,0.0010184317,0.0001717587,0.00017779678,0.001850146,0.000578626],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031442672,0.00045116115,0.0005725908,0.003703639,0.024231162,0.012241247,0.001595094,0.0032919277,0.010109814],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008162689,0.00046544417,0.00050894154,0.004274895,0.02966823,0.0026536728,0.0037813867,0.0043548974,0.0006240389],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000024991361,0.0000016903358,0.00016984898,0.000011342952,0.000001928253,0.00006174033,0.0009575702,0.00015904683,0.000022965043,0.9881832,0.0075417417,0.002886509],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025299369,0.000006348755,0.0033458495,0.00032531243,0.000019269151,0.00010089951,0.0025760692,0.0006820968,0.00010419338,0.27453214,0.7182146,0.00006788385],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9783482,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9797346,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15926635,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.15926635,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.19598593,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97513187},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W378134884","doi":"","title":"判例から見る仲裁法(35)仲裁判断の取消手続と承認・執行手続との関係[Dalimpex Ltd. v. Janicki, 64 O.R. (3d) 737, Ontario Court of Appeal, May 30, 2003]","year":2008,"lang":"ja","type":"article","venue":"JCAジャーナル","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.030519824114746793,"score_gpt":0.2802264896142281,"score_spread":0.24970666549948128,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W378134884","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.024707774,0.0028039366,0.002879718,0.03130478,0.0008094177,0.00017693687,0.00066549424,0.00010359063,0.9365484],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3879331,0.0021230069,0.005231963,0.037426196,0.000677555,0.00022672869,0.0002896293,0.00005677098,0.5660351],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99809045,0.00018948663,0.000110408575,0.00033646074,0.00070783397,0.0005653795],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990097,0.00022422113,0.0000914073,0.00006906816,0.0005068911,0.000098591976],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020458058,0.00044457632,0.00026797445,0.0008348671,0.0064591886,0.004015483,0.0009332493,0.006221782,0.017812937],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033263683,0.0005122071,0.0005567107,0.00056692486,0.0048914505,0.0017615075,0.0016713795,0.0046406235,0.0057392595],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004392183,0.000036986738,0.002408231,0.000090026144,0.00001791867,0.00055115856,0.006682198,0.00012466106,0.0018816871,0.85736924,0.112697914,0.018096026],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030179383,0.000055345045,0.0065358155,0.00016664993,0.000060307586,0.00046553384,0.0024847563,0.00022155866,0.0023997864,0.06536756,0.9221331,0.000079323116],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.21412446,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.35599434,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.78587556,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0068400875,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007780879,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42575622},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W39164428","doi":"10.1038/s41598-024-69782-w","title":"Le mariage en droit gabonais : étude comparative entre droit écrit et règles coutumières","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Crown-Indigenous Relations and Northern Affairs Canada","keywords":"Humanities; Ethnology; French; Political science; Art; Sociology","score_opus":0.017306979397410462,"score_gpt":0.35851382249239805,"score_spread":0.3412068430949876,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W39164428","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98926264,0.004542826,0.00029021464,0.00018461139,0.000023858167,0.000026468419,0.00077327865,0.000016219432,0.004879906],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.984377,0.004896491,0.00079497363,0.00010772535,0.000025463209,0.000054855216,0.0006820266,0.000027477707,0.009033959],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994823,0.00008502109,0.000037270776,0.0001252864,0.00014315349,0.00012698783],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993856,0.00015092111,0.00018488067,0.000037481885,0.0001612624,0.00007979323],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007432027,0.00077601045,0.00054437696,0.00407529,0.0017962893,0.0020986972,0.00064614235,0.00074855034,0.003709751],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002503525,0.00034883464,0.00068152207,0.0034291428,0.0009253875,0.0007306506,0.0009769305,0.00090947404,0.0005520191],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004514126,0.000094541116,0.86943924,0.00028542738,0.00041516215,0.0024496145,0.030142516,0.0006385876,0.00524701,0.002774755,0.0011362957,0.08692545],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009198976,0.00006703905,0.97241545,0.00015697198,0.000078926176,0.0016487557,0.008965104,0.00022345946,0.0005472599,0.00012189169,0.015739057,0.00002694203],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7050446,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7595343,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7050446,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0065622814,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027235395,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.59338486},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4200141961","doi":"10.1139/cjfas-2021-0251","title":"Note of appreciation","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Biology; Ecology; Geography","score_opus":0.02622736210860282,"score_gpt":0.2724147902642348,"score_spread":0.246187428155632,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4200141961","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0017566618,0.006754761,0.00084370235,0.6342964,0.29392004,0.00015397657,0.0008700992,0.00041169248,0.060992703],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.019786432,0.0032516832,0.0011998664,0.4615804,0.061957505,0.00025454143,0.0003055051,0.00029476764,0.45136932],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962496,0.00050877786,0.00028753135,0.0006474579,0.0018279281,0.000478808],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9747072,0.004516032,0.0011201799,0.0010329802,0.014422817,0.004200755],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028032681,0.00088114676,0.0016389887,0.000988693,0.0039619314,0.004949418,0.0026534596,0.008829113,0.046844795],"category_scores_gemma":[0.047577973,0.00053511525,0.0011096812,0.00073777616,0.0015625866,0.0024027308,0.003647456,0.020384071,0.02875733],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018838777,0.0000067451024,0.00019452035,0.000035621346,0.0000064771634,0.0004040342,0.00015158726,0.00002330075,0.00021030098,0.002190045,0.9913966,0.005361864],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000072016605,0.00000987292,0.00077808026,0.00009765033,0.0000054879224,0.0005274172,0.00040767866,0.000092463706,0.0000955158,0.001044964,0.9969131,0.000020563044],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019791203,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.051731516,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.046844795,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029471854,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007252434,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15671152},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4200143573","doi":"10.1017/9781108894760.011","title":"Commensurability, Comparative Law, and Confucian Legal Tradition","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Commensurability (mathematics); Reification (Marxism); Law; Sociology; Political science; Environmental ethics; Philosophy","score_opus":0.05643707234168038,"score_gpt":0.26055260707256284,"score_spread":0.20411553473088245,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4200143573","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015600745,0.04541938,0.0023743396,0.010922463,0.0003189785,0.000012848606,0.000012785681,0.000019691026,0.9253187],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8449972,0.03248396,0.0038628203,0.002780662,0.0006767962,0.0001051983,0.000065614484,0.00005877708,0.11496886],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99853146,0.0008740397,0.000028512959,0.00011170857,0.00034340247,0.000110835135],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99911636,0.0005756089,0.00007058473,0.00008733832,0.0000940155,0.00005603978],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017840951,0.00031178538,0.00032411682,0.0018288357,0.0035117068,0.004958439,0.00081045524,0.00127791,0.004947885],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0027302892,0.00017651609,0.0001414939,0.0024824631,0.026424307,0.0059108,0.0023133503,0.0025362717,0.00046944455],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000019526965,0.000004819429,0.000074088006,0.000021859456,7.1982237e-7,0.000029872008,0.0059908107,0.000035323996,0.000022410642,0.98279667,0.0021479488,0.008873595],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000061118885,0.000021463948,0.00102332,0.0004749481,0.0000038399007,0.00020060333,0.010482795,0.00020328899,0.00012611623,0.65058905,0.33685932,0.000009101895],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008013734,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013139197,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.008013734,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0070424792,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030009586,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.051097035},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4200303422","doi":"10.1017/9781009039406.010","title":"Appendix B: Cases","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Content (measure theory); Information retrieval; Link (geometry); World Wide Web; Database; Mathematics; Computer network","score_opus":0.03639975539055304,"score_gpt":0.33842787689419207,"score_spread":0.302028121503639,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4200303422","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0038537087,0.0013232976,0.0042455546,0.0060841623,0.0019095178,0.0074919737,0.54002416,0.0007789963,0.43428868],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.04343664,0.006098689,0.01644893,0.013228887,0.0014132645,0.02414582,0.42715225,0.00072861,0.4673469],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973678,0.000529877,0.00046886294,0.00029325896,0.0009999968,0.00034029633],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9797463,0.008609942,0.0016401347,0.0011348937,0.0076461653,0.0012225931],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021733597,0.00093627255,0.00076352584,0.008768866,0.0016942257,0.001631496,0.0013962734,0.0020009694,0.5848785],"category_scores_gemma":[0.031607132,0.0005979255,0.00070856715,0.0060079624,0.00043352277,0.0015148037,0.0011751323,0.0012119764,0.13523434],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004239266,0.000036281985,0.0007662777,0.0002961731,0.000005690529,0.00019825497,0.0000646723,0.00007670165,0.00004087459,0.002683814,0.986371,0.009417744],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017412966,0.000056482313,0.014764874,0.0028059985,0.000025466637,0.0017440546,0.00078612467,0.00023937055,0.0002656827,0.00935522,0.9697408,0.000041813244],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024125172,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022594707,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4151215,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031102218,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0049823197,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5921204},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4200363401","doi":"10.1017/9781108894760.002","title":"How to Do Comparative Law: Some Lessons to Be Learned","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Conciliation; Argument (complex analysis); Dream; Diversity (politics); Law; Sociology; Magnum opus; Political science; Art; Psychology; Mediation; Literature","score_opus":0.09708558413066343,"score_gpt":0.2964495488872397,"score_spread":0.19936396475657625,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4200363401","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004188393,0.20241264,0.036352444,0.5050221,0.0063516777,0.00006717351,0.00008903391,0.0001719432,0.24534461],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.48199144,0.18074434,0.12738544,0.09695903,0.012674989,0.0009029839,0.00035944858,0.0011002719,0.0978821],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.984192,0.012390176,0.0003040961,0.0009547265,0.0015469564,0.0006120968],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9774335,0.017564278,0.00031820845,0.0017211944,0.0018906894,0.0010721836],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.026579628,0.0013261271,0.001818131,0.0044853366,0.009414279,0.016165577,0.004051932,0.0070987237,0.01415415],"category_scores_gemma":[0.029066695,0.00066137116,0.00066600915,0.0042517134,0.058719076,0.048434697,0.0063995323,0.011373253,0.0031107585],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009647309,0.000024539248,0.00014392124,0.0001846215,0.000008437901,0.00007630162,0.008603168,0.00013610929,0.00003868493,0.91611224,0.042269945,0.032392357],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000067840524,0.0000065381355,0.000122067,0.00071391644,0.0000022248664,0.00006699158,0.008546828,0.00013548309,0.000053029482,0.80553144,0.18479954,0.0000151112245],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014055617,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022098893,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026579628,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011888486,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0065074875,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1405682},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4200516249","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198863168.003.0014","title":"Hedge or Counterweight? New Constitutionalism and the Role of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms in Intellectual Property Litigation","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionalism; Intellectual property; Charter; Political science; Law; Government (linguistics); Fundamental rights; Law and economics; Human rights; Sociology; Democracy; Politics","score_opus":0.016722075310253603,"score_gpt":0.22905531180780486,"score_spread":0.21233323649755126,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4200516249","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005771736,0.007947741,0.0049438523,0.033564672,0.0008202771,0.000046663492,0.00012788265,0.0000702438,0.946707],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7070278,0.012403901,0.0063909334,0.013820453,0.0008919594,0.000117868796,0.00019310259,0.00014249876,0.2590115],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9940076,0.0009290004,0.00009221005,0.0005106842,0.0032274176,0.0012330746],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968291,0.0013203754,0.00011489394,0.00025307407,0.0012158862,0.00026664013],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004166624,0.0004931862,0.00047227784,0.0031424044,0.011583738,0.013714494,0.0021152606,0.0032234816,0.008553028],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006537066,0.00032324105,0.00045087936,0.0032062011,0.03441867,0.005239291,0.0024902865,0.0057547954,0.0005720292],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000011304413,0.00000134255,0.000027449456,0.0000055202936,5.5135405e-7,0.000011557009,0.000481549,0.000079166806,0.000015684784,0.992272,0.0050128293,0.002091171],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010973064,0.0000065340696,0.0007694758,0.00024041007,0.0000148688,0.00005515522,0.0020329424,0.0009281181,0.00023231472,0.40265936,0.59301054,0.000039263086],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.91683847,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.93159646,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10991972,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10991972,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09670988,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.79752713},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4205147196","doi":"10.12987/9780300195071-012","title":"A Tamer Tort Law: The Canada- U.S. Divide","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Yale University Press eBooks","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tort; Law; Political science; Liability","score_opus":0.031125111752017497,"score_gpt":0.22987727637390012,"score_spread":0.19875216462188264,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4205147196","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011852954,0.034511212,0.0012019303,0.11761725,0.00082379946,0.000020972755,0.00032364423,0.00005005398,0.83359814],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5741581,0.03457646,0.0014502555,0.036375318,0.0006252223,0.00004641552,0.00029010477,0.000118446966,0.35235962],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99776447,0.00019052865,0.00002587711,0.00015461931,0.0010277588,0.0008366568],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99876475,0.00033390467,0.0000527001,0.00004380336,0.00051913585,0.00028572313],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010380618,0.00041702527,0.00034896718,0.002334315,0.013907512,0.009316317,0.001346638,0.004365417,0.014425403],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0034139308,0.00025352617,0.0003404355,0.003983339,0.012054863,0.0028675296,0.00202639,0.00521921,0.0010005754],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000067982614,0.000008082627,0.0004839509,0.000018939556,0.0000024202852,0.000064168555,0.0016522581,0.00013768687,0.00003524943,0.8867863,0.093382336,0.017421868],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013711403,0.000008503566,0.004824893,0.00042909395,0.000019083694,0.00011486922,0.0068174335,0.00060992624,0.00013318812,0.18573299,0.8012668,0.000029404178],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97208065,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9904406,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08633567,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08633567,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13258077,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.62641203},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4205466436","doi":"10.1093/ww/9780199540884.013.251417","title":"Barrie, Peter Anthony Stanfield, (born 12 March 1953), a Circuit Judge, since 2010; Resident Judge, Shrewsbury Crown Court, since 2010","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"reference-entry","venue":"Who's Who","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Crown (dentistry); Art; Art history; Materials science; Composite material","score_opus":0.03303782434266753,"score_gpt":0.29914342087819834,"score_spread":0.2661055965355308,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4205466436","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0061082086,0.029599467,0.00090731686,0.2797803,0.05825421,0.00055504864,0.002933039,0.0003389495,0.62152344],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0099231545,0.0029904665,0.00020890553,0.10703177,0.0018605569,0.00025370187,0.00018347432,0.0000866073,0.8774614],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99739516,0.0002428261,0.00016768755,0.0005516965,0.0008094513,0.00083314214],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979753,0.00061642425,0.00007529986,0.00005605751,0.0007827409,0.00049420056],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019107969,0.0012750342,0.0011726829,0.0015454561,0.024531929,0.00760687,0.0028321526,0.021302303,0.03586082],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0077577685,0.001493182,0.00076839764,0.0011703634,0.0024684572,0.0038466912,0.0023327984,0.022623196,0.015179814],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015772328,0.000020245312,0.00022044899,0.000034448884,0.0000035380735,0.00019732483,0.0003678606,0.00003188548,0.00006693009,0.011743026,0.9837526,0.0035458598],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024699575,0.000021806552,0.0016685855,0.00026158322,0.000013436561,0.00010664006,0.0011208545,0.00007155025,0.00013786044,0.0032827773,0.993251,0.0000392858],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.38761368,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.76715815,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96413916,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009986483,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.021570276,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.77071506},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4205494464","doi":"10.18356/5485fed0-en-fr","title":"No. 6672. United States of America and Canada","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"United Nations Treaty Series","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Geography","score_opus":0.010353346618598262,"score_gpt":0.23625720510373246,"score_spread":0.2259038584851342,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4205494464","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00026879818,0.014092294,0.00023857615,0.0031475225,0.0016402722,0.00006379757,0.0050473325,0.00016097703,0.97534037],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0011645673,0.0023361577,0.0001575329,0.0008378082,0.000066842375,0.00002499819,0.000938592,0.000059355047,0.9944141],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993081,0.000025912474,0.000025068017,0.0001131723,0.00036980162,0.00015807676],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99912816,0.000057658675,0.000024727486,0.000045564466,0.0006419131,0.00010196389],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00046092414,0.0011348953,0.0005571441,0.0023863148,0.006414561,0.0042172996,0.001384877,0.0027339852,0.19895953],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015568888,0.0006053838,0.00030532127,0.0055740387,0.0011635824,0.0017890289,0.0010735077,0.00275536,0.08945864],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008913022,0.0000059726935,0.00008180082,0.000052706753,0.000001279161,0.000026520114,0.00011907763,0.00006166687,0.00005006134,0.019501613,0.95019495,0.02989551],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000011937493,0.0000012039625,0.00020606437,0.000042024443,8.1381324e-7,0.000012647628,0.000045341345,0.000010524142,0.000015504462,0.00048333252,0.99917835,0.0000029591176],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9242714,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9715829,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19895953,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.020604173,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.039092064,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.66558594},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4205624113","doi":"10.7202/1068170ar","title":"LOYOLA LAW SCHOOL INTERNATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS CLINIC","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revue québécoise de droit international","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Human rights; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.028444325609672704,"score_gpt":0.3192340680291044,"score_spread":0.29078974241943173,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4205624113","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0091021005,0.014998227,0.0002589601,0.14402711,0.002789984,0.0002130237,0.0010920515,0.0003135169,0.827205],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.049301818,0.0038171299,0.0002825335,0.032786902,0.00052553206,0.0002754806,0.00026790198,0.00010739,0.91263545],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985025,0.00015890662,0.000040643194,0.00019694526,0.00042215068,0.00067893753],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977633,0.00047167818,0.0001386978,0.00009208283,0.0006791489,0.0008550878],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001352038,0.00054168596,0.00028250663,0.0010930165,0.013666737,0.0056962413,0.0014623078,0.0076627447,0.22015668],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0041517997,0.0007313385,0.0003001564,0.0009521219,0.002704644,0.0027326776,0.0033405123,0.007124868,0.028696485],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019717549,0.000073316194,0.0016262088,0.00006557535,0.0000037631387,0.0008036771,0.0010800896,0.000020406098,0.00019740006,0.019858832,0.95088387,0.02536724],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024499239,0.00001144754,0.00420584,0.00024291953,0.0000037150724,0.00024262135,0.0018699389,0.000047442714,0.00010623731,0.0013073016,0.99191564,0.000022362785],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.45361462,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7775975,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.45361462,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010945455,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.026056021,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9019486},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4205644112","doi":"10.1007/978-3-030-84647-3_19","title":"Chapter 7: Article 21—Adoption","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Children's well-being","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Political science; Sociology; Computer science; Engineering ethics; Engineering","score_opus":0.010203728247796386,"score_gpt":0.24043340866477048,"score_spread":0.2302296804169741,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4205644112","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00039009957,0.022779427,0.00062611327,0.009818173,0.004740361,0.000046422036,0.00017658701,0.000052917683,0.9613699],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00728489,0.02141719,0.00067075307,0.006712976,0.002254465,0.00009705117,0.00028723327,0.00011619071,0.96115917],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99951494,0.00013943294,0.000016605729,0.00006226248,0.00020953394,0.000057278587],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996314,0.00015486992,0.000020269788,0.000030114894,0.00011218231,0.000051194635],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005182025,0.000481364,0.00028994321,0.0011275122,0.0021271594,0.0040364806,0.0006798138,0.0024845693,0.11200823],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011600256,0.00022692606,0.0002898252,0.0017091898,0.0018068718,0.00250325,0.0019019471,0.0031639691,0.0369556],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000501821,0.000032944095,0.00009504159,0.00013637352,0.0000016838098,0.000052478594,0.0013721092,0.000059407306,0.000106299405,0.11249593,0.83489347,0.05074932],"study_design_scores_gemma":[7.245048e-7,0.000003288289,0.00019255033,0.00030611316,8.1532716e-7,0.000051497864,0.0002497825,0.000009185728,0.000033274326,0.0049644657,0.99418616,0.0000019477566],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00903142,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020892087,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11200823,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002815238,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00197051,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37470484},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4205703315","doi":"10.1163/ej.9789028609020.177-280.9","title":"Table des matières","year":2010,"lang":"fr","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Martinus Nijhoff Publishers eBooks","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Table (database); Round table; Political science; Law; Humanities; Cartography; History; Geography; Art; Advertising; Computer science; Business; Database","score_opus":0.033437242779895994,"score_gpt":0.25723836629653063,"score_spread":0.22380112351663464,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4205703315","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00097194035,0.010879726,0.002521737,0.0054204925,0.014542926,0.00014481986,0.015074208,0.0013711329,0.949073],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0055662696,0.0053467974,0.0025982028,0.0014491086,0.0026693898,0.00019206587,0.0076534054,0.0007829904,0.9737419],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998814,0.00018322075,0.00007076817,0.00019791475,0.00061600516,0.000118098505],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99785906,0.0005739902,0.00009844348,0.00018693195,0.0010542339,0.0002272376],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00090208603,0.0010537324,0.00091494486,0.002980109,0.0025949702,0.0070973793,0.0009677827,0.0012530002,0.68211514],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005172818,0.00048245862,0.0007995489,0.003276092,0.0005812451,0.002862593,0.0013375819,0.0024023924,0.38587803],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008111758,0.000032020525,0.00015525807,0.00023444096,0.000006157652,0.00008167758,0.000104530685,0.000117446674,0.00025453203,0.039647955,0.8561828,0.10310207],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000058376963,0.000007250816,0.0001537545,0.00007796596,0.0000014383935,0.00005338644,0.000039686754,0.000024262246,0.00006402854,0.001338323,0.99822956,0.000004500065],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015067194,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013278248,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31788486,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027403801,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002636186,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.45342416},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4206235530","doi":"10.1093/cjcl/cxac001","title":"Applying the CISG to Hong Kong: Legal Analysis and Policy Recommendations","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Chinese Journal of Comparative Law","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"China; Negotiation; Business; International trade; Product (mathematics); Convention; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.03545764800285394,"score_gpt":0.3969114897672369,"score_spread":0.36145384176438294,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4206235530","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.034073863,0.031519387,0.0031660984,0.75214887,0.004566716,0.001651801,0.0058136075,0.00019477407,0.16686498],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.31329858,0.11117041,0.025260918,0.32543257,0.003150968,0.0031767872,0.00817288,0.0001596038,0.21017723],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99088496,0.0030718201,0.0005847483,0.0005825464,0.0018565108,0.003019392],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.980588,0.005391431,0.001337444,0.0008133333,0.008682661,0.0031871253],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.020108832,0.0011525826,0.00089797575,0.004248711,0.0038014469,0.013294939,0.0041574477,0.010113208,0.02259194],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023452062,0.00081347354,0.0013823997,0.005034902,0.0042431746,0.008922404,0.004319244,0.0072638234,0.0029286875],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017451453,0.00059964496,0.0150534585,0.0030502984,0.00008702661,0.0019910971,0.005102086,0.0048864083,0.00065036456,0.3760606,0.53120744,0.061137047],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001981267,0.00020269095,0.03973556,0.009940229,0.00016444919,0.00020434205,0.037634615,0.0060604485,0.0010074076,0.047116883,0.85740256,0.00033263114],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.71785307,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.53557205,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.71785307,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.034525193,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.21282388,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.56761706},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4206399425","doi":"10.4309/jgi.2001.4.4","title":"Note 1","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Gambling Issues","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Art","score_opus":0.13614966704838202,"score_gpt":0.4309496319170668,"score_spread":0.29479996486868476,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4206399425","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006637167,0.0019117283,0.0018165888,0.054545097,0.011496983,0.0020995208,0.038128935,0.0008132977,0.8825508],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.016355421,0.0012132373,0.0015015997,0.08808113,0.0033038284,0.0027761643,0.006160244,0.000192166,0.8804163],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963786,0.0004493373,0.0002753677,0.0005777533,0.0012614619,0.0010575965],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99130577,0.004603054,0.00046428273,0.0007486004,0.002360727,0.0005174955],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036725649,0.0014455712,0.0014089161,0.0027423745,0.007790453,0.004648431,0.0061519747,0.013697883,0.13881527],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015164303,0.0012307662,0.001253803,0.0034101335,0.0012777707,0.0024270143,0.002856541,0.010589057,0.10199219],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000725727,0.00016760893,0.0006768542,0.00013217989,0.000011166871,0.00012651362,0.00035728977,0.0001034078,0.00036051724,0.018833747,0.97165823,0.007499954],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008526765,0.00005436134,0.011732178,0.0002568393,0.000020914438,0.00006891376,0.0005756349,0.00012734575,0.0007307508,0.005438569,0.98085034,0.000058797516],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1185874,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2288089,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8611847,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032207645,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009126047,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4206751831","doi":"10.1163/ej.9789028609020.177-280.2","title":"Introduction","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Martinus Nijhoff Publishers eBooks","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law","score_opus":0.014139357013766918,"score_gpt":0.2442795291708181,"score_spread":0.23014017215705118,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4206751831","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00046131253,0.003065144,0.0024919338,0.006190695,0.0041946243,0.00008890509,0.0016980551,0.00044118523,0.98136824],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0028438568,0.0018960328,0.0012362001,0.0025189817,0.00080262794,0.00006674602,0.0012416819,0.00018750866,0.98920643],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992372,0.00010415947,0.000031148764,0.00018461203,0.00034138345,0.00010152243],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99906415,0.00017384117,0.00003381845,0.000118646756,0.00043837866,0.00017111255],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00074442755,0.0006852849,0.00045623476,0.0011415232,0.001829368,0.004767512,0.0016781873,0.0024621694,0.51535064],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028348041,0.00028639636,0.00041505494,0.0012488652,0.00095287367,0.003824244,0.0022912715,0.0021473283,0.3069227],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017502682,0.000030412912,0.00014502992,0.00012618407,0.0000017299569,0.000058452042,0.0004906058,0.00008403652,0.00015473878,0.114270754,0.782866,0.10175462],"study_design_scores_gemma":[9.80051e-7,0.000003518703,0.000068551766,0.000055943117,4.3336937e-7,0.000025465517,0.00006152839,0.000008415401,0.000019772886,0.0033826956,0.99637103,0.000001726357],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0067937826,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007624802,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.51535064,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002218546,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0026369498,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6912935},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4210513953","doi":"10.1139/bcb-2021-0592","title":"Note of appreciation","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biochemistry and Cell Biology","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Biology; Psychology; Chemistry","score_opus":0.010012831891315329,"score_gpt":0.26615267214147875,"score_spread":0.2561398402501634,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4210513953","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.001373002,0.0062823724,0.0010491811,0.6081422,0.3369454,0.0001048025,0.000630268,0.00035783558,0.045114934],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.02293475,0.003816564,0.0017700448,0.47653455,0.09666457,0.0002729651,0.000290333,0.00042607376,0.39729023],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9956214,0.0006888066,0.000308256,0.00070694,0.0022070261,0.00046769483],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.968016,0.006068122,0.0013231694,0.0013894031,0.017784385,0.0054189493],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030205718,0.00092710886,0.0017400375,0.0009103406,0.0035106342,0.005309779,0.0025509826,0.0071373302,0.043755237],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06466827,0.00045744306,0.0010627178,0.0005706566,0.0017731182,0.0025911655,0.0039885486,0.020205535,0.030905101],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019985424,0.0000061698934,0.0001813392,0.00003608781,0.000006737093,0.00035610664,0.00019047005,0.000023348488,0.00021541546,0.0023867511,0.99083143,0.005746119],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007935933,0.000009088344,0.0005702626,0.00010593938,0.0000059890667,0.00074593065,0.00045913685,0.000100651334,0.000099906254,0.0015382722,0.99633586,0.000021103562],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010896529,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02684223,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95624477,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025356973,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0062855966,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14637583},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4212913071","doi":"10.1163/1875-8096_pplrdc_a9789028616325_01","title":"Constitutional Aspects of Private International Law in Australia and in Canada (Volume 126)","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"dataset","venue":"Collected Courses of the Hague Academy of International Law","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Volume (thermodynamics); Law; Political science; Conflict of laws; Physics; Thermodynamics","score_opus":0.025724519941913083,"score_gpt":0.30976190826515226,"score_spread":0.28403738832323916,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4212913071","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"dataset","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"dataset","genre_consensus":"dataset","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00037600295,0.0000792777,0.00001732898,0.000051238814,0.000008332484,0.0000049141827,0.9984628,0.000041788244,0.0009582385],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0010807293,0.00013266051,0.00009286322,0.000026545466,0.0000046746177,0.000034267374,0.9965917,0.000023194227,0.0020133257],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99885297,0.00009861891,0.00011301906,0.00017982298,0.0004503477,0.00030519598],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99500495,0.0011212154,0.0005612903,0.0006484745,0.0021053273,0.0005588403],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009049187,0.001037679,0.0009447113,0.008459623,0.0016086103,0.0035057466,0.0016726945,0.0011627588,0.04816836],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0069669425,0.0008127735,0.0009412276,0.018670201,0.00063047715,0.0009537643,0.0017212188,0.0019642923,0.028257456],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036582926,0.000024465424,0.0038422293,0.0003903923,0.000025336001,0.000025049761,0.0001162694,0.00035525628,0.00004640066,0.0011483167,0.9908131,0.0031766968],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007052465,0.000007143335,0.054942433,0.000530692,0.0000307534,0.00003579456,0.00036288425,0.00032276518,0.00019993431,0.00095773727,0.942511,0.000028268045],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.77226335,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8538072,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22773665,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008786199,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017807141,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.45815563},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4214911020","doi":"10.18356/9789210010221c007","title":"No. 1375. Canada and Australia","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"United Nations Treaty Series","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"History; Geography","score_opus":0.029752333630378693,"score_gpt":0.2696244062832851,"score_spread":0.23987207265290642,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4214911020","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0006699219,0.017827628,0.00022214184,0.0064301775,0.0021586649,0.0000696582,0.0021852783,0.00010753495,0.97032905],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0014011405,0.0010719287,0.000060739803,0.0012041522,0.000066673754,0.000017473689,0.00016447833,0.000023410874,0.99599],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996055,0.000020898922,0.000013027894,0.000058919988,0.00020893352,0.00009284198],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996014,0.000048148282,0.000015896463,0.000022179205,0.0002499102,0.000062502404],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003406425,0.00075967674,0.0004243762,0.0012504571,0.0052631134,0.002692425,0.0010355993,0.0025724166,0.15925401],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009865646,0.00058548246,0.00027177838,0.0020976358,0.0009751474,0.0013035589,0.0008810691,0.0029541813,0.04891542],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015633623,0.000009569848,0.00013073828,0.00006901484,0.0000019696924,0.000037344722,0.0002406056,0.00006227763,0.000102496095,0.02953104,0.9406155,0.029183783],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000015890315,0.0000018203816,0.00053513487,0.00004074107,9.1655784e-7,0.000012487466,0.00006862823,0.000016457458,0.000030192921,0.0006723646,0.99861693,0.0000028028298],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.82932055,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9456119,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17067945,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010712838,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014062663,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.53275776},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4214926895","doi":"10.1093/ulr/5.2.299-a","title":"The Evolution of Legal Systems, Bijuralism and International Trade / Evolution Des Systemes Juridiques Et Mondialisation - Ottawa (Canada), 20-21 October/octobre 2000. Conference organised by the Faculty of Law, University of Ottawa in collaboration with the Canadian Department of Justice and the Department of Heritage Canada / Colloque organise par la Faculte de droit de l'Universite d'Ottawa en collaboration avec le Ministere de la Justice du Canada et le Ministere du Patrimoine du Canada.","year":2000,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Uniform Law Review","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Economic Justice; Library science; Humanities; Law; Art","score_opus":0.0049458349740787964,"score_gpt":0.21857613864043451,"score_spread":0.21363030366635571,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4214926895","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.053153757,0.54866195,0.000528058,0.16159767,0.0018532912,0.00016439595,0.0069584935,0.00008501821,0.22699736],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6105132,0.25901738,0.001323583,0.007014188,0.0004997623,0.00013161829,0.0033574011,0.00008470292,0.118058145],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99559814,0.00073109765,0.00024413156,0.00037498155,0.0019585583,0.0010931246],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9879546,0.0020196254,0.001059117,0.00037542303,0.007322845,0.0012684395],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003866119,0.00034813583,0.00054331066,0.006069963,0.008687789,0.009754465,0.0017802463,0.002387751,0.008931803],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01253395,0.00077690755,0.0003455805,0.015148118,0.008770035,0.0034045323,0.0017074398,0.0024255603,0.00084890384],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022017639,0.00006901161,0.03328672,0.002198607,0.00021231796,0.0004869677,0.018548585,0.0013188724,0.0006462648,0.3123954,0.48303378,0.14758334],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000039738505,0.00002845888,0.18722206,0.0015134555,0.00013116452,0.00012611227,0.009596545,0.00020876962,0.00039753612,0.0109397,0.7896829,0.000113544615],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98817086,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99491054,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16838464,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.16838464,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.15741567,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9645559},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4214946147","doi":"10.3917/riges.373.0005","title":"Introduction","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gestion","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy","score_opus":0.02051162510308103,"score_gpt":0.2934924808710313,"score_spread":0.2729808557679503,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4214946147","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.088680215,0.009662658,0.013938533,0.013664576,0.0023157438,0.0007182749,0.017528962,0.0008424404,0.8526486],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5523444,0.010737047,0.014159965,0.007965341,0.00146889,0.0012250665,0.01442022,0.00043180675,0.39724734],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99663585,0.00061497843,0.00022337049,0.0007621064,0.0012688866,0.00049487816],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995105,0.0010408886,0.000977095,0.00051467534,0.0016908371,0.0006713816],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022251594,0.0005383336,0.0005521828,0.0015104961,0.0013088331,0.0037152872,0.0016217165,0.0018841916,0.1478477],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009650326,0.00019927468,0.00068479497,0.0015735773,0.0013141718,0.0017848527,0.0019680462,0.0012101537,0.023790523],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006411456,0.00040478818,0.0815993,0.002534586,0.0001251843,0.002250749,0.0068093864,0.0014527639,0.00432651,0.15019634,0.25411588,0.49554327],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003366512,0.00018877028,0.073975295,0.0012508067,0.000053525582,0.002635864,0.004007992,0.00031821572,0.0012300486,0.021410197,0.89482707,0.00006850036],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010796233,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010426019,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8521523,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020310152,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033690808,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49459982},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4223498131","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2021-0085","title":"Frontiers of legality: Understanding the public policy exception in choice of law","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Principle of legality; Public law; Law; Political science; Municipal law; Private law; Comparative law; Doctrine; Philosophy of law; Common law; Choice of law; Conflict of laws","score_opus":0.0494973636357639,"score_gpt":0.286267658032464,"score_spread":0.2367702943967001,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4223498131","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08012637,0.010670705,0.15520571,0.17570114,0.00076464156,0.00012022991,0.000092968425,0.00011020203,0.577208],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97752756,0.0030159522,0.0087974155,0.00425022,0.00076804566,0.00012567727,0.000041169944,0.00005915911,0.0054147793],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9918665,0.0048092594,0.00021171058,0.00082568865,0.0013076133,0.0009791881],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9850735,0.011466043,0.0011591171,0.0008537633,0.0006815999,0.00076595315],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011314901,0.00053774286,0.0008943353,0.0030436548,0.0075012674,0.01843717,0.0028003652,0.008634241,0.0038962935],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013297574,0.0004877281,0.001086379,0.002493598,0.08042515,0.030554509,0.009808066,0.011335889,0.00055212673],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000011801671,0.0000031790269,0.000058230882,0.0000052167943,3.9167733e-7,0.00001670817,0.0011988367,0.0000931971,0.000011389441,0.9979519,0.00013158712,0.0005282075],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000029504488,0.0000032080743,0.000104831044,0.00004512745,0.0000013712358,0.000019255149,0.0010558687,0.0004656246,0.000019559602,0.99171066,0.0065674647,0.000004110098],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0071977526,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0031968637,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01843717,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010972444,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007926917,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.079611},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4224116544","doi":"10.1017/9781009023122.021","title":"Hybridity in International Adjudication","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Centre for International Governance Innovation","funders":"","keywords":"Hybridity; Adjudication; Political science; Sociology; Law; Anthropology","score_opus":0.029823459231707913,"score_gpt":0.2445653156702511,"score_spread":0.2147418564385432,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4224116544","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.064280756,0.008284441,0.020784704,0.0070904824,0.000204371,0.00003029831,0.00003465509,0.00005559574,0.8992347],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.977029,0.002366632,0.0034274003,0.0011426439,0.00014626545,0.0000626754,0.000043825803,0.000053736152,0.01572782],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99018586,0.0061680474,0.00031736412,0.00079672044,0.0017645261,0.0007673891],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9940849,0.003984426,0.0003692941,0.00082890777,0.00051991944,0.00021260741],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0044549247,0.00020641323,0.000351013,0.0018429777,0.004530408,0.010535159,0.0007855113,0.0016584053,0.003633992],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008843735,0.00021897366,0.00032736917,0.0036233738,0.021318916,0.0076724864,0.0054689585,0.0044379095,0.00052905496],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000019490842,0.0000026226994,0.00018551809,0.000009027235,0.0000012912438,0.000029437579,0.0054470827,0.000057586534,0.000032149543,0.988305,0.0005627793,0.0053656497],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005757647,0.000016713378,0.0011959918,0.00018203682,0.0000070823844,0.00029596087,0.0110243,0.0006086559,0.00021675971,0.8700189,0.11641225,0.000015615096],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026175617,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027053645,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010535159,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037971316,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001924886,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02755022},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4224994360","doi":"10.1017/9781108891103","title":"Injunctions in Patent Law","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Enforcement; Flexibility (engineering); Patent law; Patent troll; Law and economics; Patent infringement; Political science; Law; Business; Intellectual property; Economics; Management","score_opus":0.04471699258732026,"score_gpt":0.23667623311097702,"score_spread":0.19195924052365676,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4224994360","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0020267281,0.029170403,0.006773272,0.008759304,0.000932547,0.000049585255,0.00004635211,0.000069893555,0.9521719],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.19077241,0.042579573,0.007861828,0.01463639,0.00277037,0.00033924624,0.00018916953,0.00016174681,0.7406892],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9959485,0.0009938718,0.00017200698,0.00045526683,0.0020791371,0.00035120526],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971486,0.001908208,0.00017110856,0.0003066124,0.00037208354,0.0000934967],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002962554,0.000630184,0.00057519967,0.0018242906,0.003954346,0.00834159,0.0011225193,0.0037633448,0.0074217203],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007452604,0.00041787032,0.00050983374,0.0020456316,0.01587026,0.00769545,0.002886345,0.005535766,0.0029678026],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000019561166,0.0000046612136,0.000022191307,0.000022980372,9.504881e-7,0.00002613586,0.00041744937,0.00009895454,0.0000360151,0.9778762,0.013093254,0.008399348],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000044180374,0.000012685546,0.00014345486,0.00022739757,0.000004444878,0.00010932251,0.00026654423,0.00024668055,0.00013472892,0.576474,0.42236778,0.000008467772],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002945555,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025714734,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00834159,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0047556083,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004184189,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.034504473},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4229542000","doi":"10.1093/iclq/50.3.632","title":"Pragmatism Rules","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International and Comparative Law Quarterly","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Law; Enforcement; Convention; Political science; Civil procedure; Pragmatism; Schedule; Law and economics; Business; Sociology; Economics; Management; Philosophy","score_opus":0.047062230425255897,"score_gpt":0.34246835315150387,"score_spread":0.295406122726248,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4229542000","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0040133856,0.0011479402,0.05487414,0.018922634,0.001065365,0.00030252198,0.00050290406,0.000347115,0.918824],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.51633203,0.0018571897,0.08785043,0.025491662,0.00253357,0.0026126509,0.0010639814,0.000768167,0.36149034],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98380554,0.0041349125,0.0015115242,0.004231722,0.0048514456,0.0014648644],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9900933,0.0039041163,0.00058293424,0.0026395167,0.0025141903,0.00026587467],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0137036815,0.00087864336,0.0009811461,0.0020643312,0.007840577,0.010244099,0.0039063985,0.006903786,0.030678764],"category_scores_gemma":[0.032833353,0.00085153437,0.0015663219,0.0016168677,0.012013585,0.010152038,0.006054818,0.0106535815,0.011517673],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005731749,0.000004566856,0.00003848612,0.000016022102,0.000002902333,0.000028162605,0.0003452946,0.00007759862,0.000035598696,0.9890745,0.007882708,0.002488384],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002253907,0.0000075987177,0.00007199576,0.00010018917,0.000008946692,0.00009283612,0.00018727712,0.00047592644,0.00021207216,0.86173165,0.13707356,0.000015389847],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004134622,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004182502,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030678764,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0053061186,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0054764766,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.102630734},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4229941087","doi":"10.1017/cbo9781107784772.002","title":"Declarations of personal interest","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institute of Cancer Research","funders":"","keywords":"Content (measure theory); Computer science; Personally identifiable information; Internet privacy; World Wide Web; Information retrieval; Computer security; Mathematics","score_opus":0.07858023651737239,"score_gpt":0.24946876557943012,"score_spread":0.17088852906205773,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4229941087","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.003235556,0.038039424,0.008957222,0.20499481,0.09184033,0.0015218545,0.014476622,0.0009390474,0.63599515],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.07082284,0.028642109,0.018636128,0.083813645,0.026781667,0.0038273798,0.014404728,0.0013977515,0.75167376],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99185467,0.0017547088,0.0007301288,0.0008651566,0.0040874956,0.0007078686],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.951503,0.015916105,0.003536319,0.005084564,0.018779699,0.0051803407],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009307251,0.00084315997,0.0012737269,0.0009787771,0.0013941029,0.003063319,0.002506716,0.003466412,0.1844615],"category_scores_gemma":[0.11650759,0.00045585097,0.0006595923,0.0013015795,0.001835182,0.0019080009,0.002355082,0.0063337516,0.0766278],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000058281636,0.000023573615,0.00045345243,0.00072093547,0.000022619577,0.0007605535,0.001114277,0.0000422953,0.00023235878,0.027113652,0.91523826,0.054219782],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001830049,0.000019251886,0.00036805047,0.0010510777,0.000015389674,0.0012443046,0.0004349802,0.000062946565,0.00015390504,0.0055968966,0.9910246,0.000010349544],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00086552114,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0018542425,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1844615,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0012663074,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007496192,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6170852},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4230651989","doi":"10.3917/tu.023.0038","title":"Introduction","year":2018,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Tous urbains","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Musée de la Civilisation","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.019074275491195867,"score_gpt":0.2895488549977709,"score_spread":0.270474579506575,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4230651989","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02435476,0.009598477,0.011904239,0.03256087,0.006349354,0.00033491943,0.0033512376,0.0011749006,0.9103713],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.17434911,0.00640644,0.00820636,0.013247647,0.0014740658,0.0003990302,0.0027295067,0.00044629653,0.79274154],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976434,0.0005110123,0.0001011774,0.0005716059,0.0007033432,0.00046934598],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99741024,0.00035773852,0.00021523007,0.0004148795,0.0011529289,0.00044895805],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023610878,0.0006995935,0.00054644234,0.0009488608,0.0037075116,0.0043438436,0.001976089,0.0026334357,0.19619736],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00603753,0.00024156675,0.00055587717,0.0012339137,0.0017905827,0.0027157085,0.003460428,0.0017557257,0.06322535],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018909945,0.00013702636,0.009977426,0.0008554169,0.000027279897,0.0006799161,0.006460789,0.00030197235,0.0014641313,0.25115252,0.36195782,0.36679658],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000049888217,0.000030961375,0.0035531174,0.0003512985,0.0000074941454,0.00030281948,0.001515386,0.00006880659,0.00025512942,0.0064893183,0.9874089,0.000011763306],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014757552,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016619023,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8038026,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032191654,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004647688,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.65634555},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4231095648","doi":"10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195329278.003.0004","title":"Canada","year":2007,"lang":"it","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Doctrine; Jurisdiction; Law; Political science; Common law","score_opus":0.03738016599703249,"score_gpt":0.23467394150259557,"score_spread":0.1972937755055631,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4231095648","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0012496843,0.0028138368,0.00039538383,0.004575471,0.0006712819,0.000034147677,0.0039906446,0.00022934425,0.9860401],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0051191426,0.0013606264,0.00041345548,0.0012989437,0.00003525173,0.000012300431,0.0011064162,0.00007842411,0.9905753],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991636,0.000024655388,0.000017753326,0.00014690786,0.00042370654,0.000223424],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991186,0.00004214249,0.000023581208,0.00003629267,0.0006206351,0.00015866717],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00026872766,0.00055469666,0.00038507982,0.0013051447,0.007596147,0.004488093,0.0010175218,0.0017325677,0.3298147],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010235509,0.00034202693,0.00039600284,0.0028654304,0.00092526636,0.0013793724,0.001245377,0.0017702703,0.080054045],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025286461,0.000015449286,0.0007688231,0.00014908735,0.0000059472964,0.00028845097,0.00051962864,0.000110300934,0.00032732336,0.10391978,0.8204121,0.0734579],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000018215972,0.0000019119252,0.0004225801,0.000025301191,0.0000012954067,0.00003540297,0.00013423165,0.000020550782,0.00004929811,0.0007226643,0.9985807,0.000004180448],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9231589,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97479826,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3298147,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.028759308,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.045585718,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4231814723","doi":"10.1093/nq/510184","title":"Review: The Beginnings of English Law","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Notes and Queries","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"English law; Law; History; Classics; Media studies; Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.016568394844404543,"score_gpt":0.2911095621237957,"score_spread":0.27454116727939115,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4231814723","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00002102475,0.9919593,0.00003250755,0.0057830457,0.001037511,0.0000029282112,0.00002678329,0.000002855593,0.0011340381],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0009890898,0.99207896,0.00009348755,0.00418922,0.0018463884,0.000015256622,0.000038826027,0.000004577689,0.0007441719],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9948619,0.0024975035,0.00074144057,0.00029558723,0.0012934221,0.00031012335],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97974545,0.014584087,0.0013455441,0.00042928156,0.00336991,0.00052574155],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0049586585,0.0008483964,0.0032743302,0.0067380676,0.0010339416,0.006062089,0.0014874133,0.003245314,0.013380342],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023090048,0.0005620846,0.0010391898,0.00921794,0.0030312238,0.0073473495,0.0021194275,0.0039196014,0.0037048075],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000083782266,0.00001728493,0.00017363582,0.039962254,0.00019964426,0.00014543584,0.0006615283,0.00012011058,0.00013505026,0.02528943,0.6589368,0.27427512],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001533611,0.000017484766,0.0006488624,0.059830405,0.00010460948,0.00016861754,0.00030883646,0.000019078856,0.000029284936,0.007492741,0.9313545,0.0000101871765],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006457788,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017047588,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013380342,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0053916513,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011901198,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.044761717},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4232415409","doi":"10.1007/978-3-642-27833-4_219-4","title":"Campbellrand-Malmani Platform, South Africa","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Encyclopedia of Astrobiology","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Geography","score_opus":0.018744502176744705,"score_gpt":0.24550062041612977,"score_spread":0.22675611823938507,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4232415409","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0028884283,0.018252842,0.0010895503,0.002927698,0.0009183889,0.00010093577,0.0005720746,0.00019659965,0.97305346],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.009707317,0.0055721053,0.00091702683,0.00019998547,0.000042405754,0.00004070646,0.0001256712,0.00011558354,0.98327905],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99992263,0.000008184375,0.0000029817538,0.000019585588,0.000025286192,0.000021294854],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99991107,0.000024775767,0.00000755603,0.000007411749,0.000028631484,0.000020675141],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00017359461,0.00060659234,0.00020541075,0.0010114767,0.0026998573,0.002658077,0.0004969034,0.0010469715,0.19123551],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006403667,0.0003631252,0.000115830946,0.0015708999,0.0005547719,0.002982073,0.0013541979,0.0011282574,0.026412385],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000060684153,0.000028268561,0.0003412675,0.000575965,0.0000035394642,0.000717268,0.0029690634,0.00021863135,0.0024035347,0.1223467,0.5035492,0.3667859],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000020329644,0.0000037321752,0.00030273234,0.00008491792,0.0000011005083,0.00012141516,0.00034152772,0.000029821846,0.00020746552,0.0017334229,0.99716944,0.0000023552614],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017860444,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0719948,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19123551,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017010325,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002784351,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.63974655},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4232813910","doi":"10.1139/juvs-2018-0034","title":"Note of appreciation","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Unmanned Vehicle Systems","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.02031185928765546,"score_gpt":0.3228300597744643,"score_spread":0.30251820048680883,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4232813910","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0021988647,0.0063975453,0.00087064505,0.58293223,0.36017233,0.00013729779,0.00074213854,0.00034604364,0.046202812],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.028660428,0.003864913,0.0012802868,0.48718643,0.10365684,0.00029712042,0.0002890253,0.00028625422,0.37447864],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99674124,0.0004371046,0.0002923322,0.00063079176,0.0014909361,0.00040756894],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97589195,0.00456038,0.0011816949,0.0010661673,0.013875631,0.0034241248],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0024497712,0.0008737427,0.0015471595,0.0007867819,0.0033552358,0.0050773793,0.0024149113,0.008776047,0.037889674],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05151118,0.00047868676,0.0010977868,0.0006056611,0.0017378845,0.0024634404,0.0031706942,0.0203506,0.023712458],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002476245,0.000008674301,0.00026857667,0.00004277209,0.00000837883,0.0005765902,0.00019787934,0.000029987665,0.00025013054,0.0022693202,0.9900383,0.0062845936],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008186592,0.000011639121,0.0008971834,0.000100481106,0.000005799115,0.00081914105,0.0004487166,0.00011309575,0.00010659011,0.001206452,0.9962599,0.000022941327],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01179041,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.027560482,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.037889674,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002579115,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005384057,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12675363},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4233505623","doi":"10.1007/978-1-4939-7131-2_100593","title":"Legal Issues and Implications","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law and economics; Engineering ethics; Sociology; Engineering","score_opus":0.03258932250512865,"score_gpt":0.33012266195395384,"score_spread":0.2975333394488252,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4233505623","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00083832646,0.011108145,0.001405528,0.08836674,0.003711796,0.00003085259,0.00004754396,0.0000185291,0.8944726],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.09661177,0.019573541,0.0031989608,0.09050343,0.007858515,0.00038847528,0.00017764607,0.000121977624,0.7815657],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9963432,0.0016378262,0.000102681704,0.0003877446,0.0010482788,0.00048017205],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99677676,0.0020278953,0.00009145104,0.00017897955,0.0006703089,0.00025452854],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0051726284,0.00056511967,0.000631423,0.0019710166,0.0074349255,0.010363907,0.0022189145,0.009632865,0.047033332],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0099687725,0.00031613174,0.0004191831,0.0016413516,0.018955193,0.009550464,0.0047047674,0.009576092,0.006812812],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000016266093,0.000008709099,0.000013186667,0.000017664484,5.877199e-7,0.00002644263,0.00061992655,0.000037959624,0.000012256478,0.9470935,0.046618633,0.0055495133],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000040163845,0.0000031344018,0.000064588094,0.00032801213,0.000002008904,0.000057891975,0.0017228602,0.00006678557,0.000031890533,0.520266,0.4774466,0.000006198101],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011246385,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019021986,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.047033332,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007663151,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008930562,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1573422},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4233550381","doi":"10.1017/s0008413100000827","title":"Note from the Editor","year":2004,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Journal of Linguistics / La revue canadienne de linguistique","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Applied linguistics; Linguistics; Cognitive linguistics; Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy; Psychology; Cognition","score_opus":0.013406934769436682,"score_gpt":0.2636589230990023,"score_spread":0.25025198832956563,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4233550381","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00014314667,0.0025007795,0.00029642723,0.3341892,0.6553346,0.000028001577,0.00016662444,0.00010513904,0.0072360653],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.003378071,0.0033960142,0.0006778148,0.46375695,0.3912634,0.00007248358,0.00016205378,0.00016370864,0.13712962],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977725,0.00035420008,0.0003058598,0.00043121463,0.00095510116,0.00018107807],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9820592,0.0044533443,0.0007276725,0.00060884835,0.010492268,0.0016586643],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028259687,0.0010181429,0.00090976694,0.0010036262,0.0025016228,0.003603011,0.0018762427,0.008279472,0.04909203],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030704867,0.0004871271,0.0009226235,0.0006839764,0.000973944,0.0038660767,0.0015662794,0.011691825,0.03328221],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000074825166,0.0000028116947,0.000036248,0.000023735434,0.0000017511903,0.00008062643,0.000011405756,0.000007661859,0.00003789849,0.00025319873,0.996166,0.0033711926],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006691663,0.0000069693456,0.00021086315,0.00008034235,0.0000053660833,0.00027309015,0.000060182254,0.00003363145,0.00013735778,0.0004943053,0.9986791,0.000012038597],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004132718,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008448063,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04909203,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016317493,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003467354,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16422915},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4233859335","doi":"10.7202/1044861ar","title":"SÛRETÉS","year":2010,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue du notariat","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.013860775817756528,"score_gpt":0.2664874436191961,"score_spread":0.25262666780143955,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4233859335","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010251828,0.0032081204,0.015591645,0.01648889,0.0070491806,0.0002469349,0.0024684083,0.0016491427,0.943046],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.058049124,0.0019710294,0.007813891,0.0043813735,0.0009907723,0.00024071026,0.0020891572,0.00059347774,0.92387056],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9946779,0.0013863062,0.00033659145,0.0008077666,0.002205027,0.0005863368],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9919464,0.0019961991,0.00053764874,0.0017016776,0.003110665,0.00070736854],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0044455486,0.0008522657,0.000712593,0.0021394764,0.0033732844,0.0070419423,0.0019445617,0.0024248047,0.27743664],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018666003,0.0004705785,0.0008778174,0.0017702644,0.0014829922,0.0037658035,0.004932665,0.0029601608,0.08499584],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00033625777,0.00016567744,0.0048379875,0.00045511924,0.000059296726,0.0005210819,0.0028237416,0.00071213406,0.0021926006,0.29198366,0.33253327,0.36337912],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014944308,0.000034593475,0.0015174336,0.000138184,0.000011184149,0.00016838408,0.00041785697,0.00020109183,0.0006104248,0.009825865,0.98704356,0.000016476315],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0064698867,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008074398,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.27743664,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025240497,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00490983,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4234058516","doi":"10.1089/blr.2010.9960","title":"In the High Court of Justice Before The Hon. Mr. Justice Arnold: <i>Intervet UK Ltd. v. Merial, the Queen's University of Belfast, and the University of Saskatchewan</i> (Case no. HC09C00779)","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biotechnology Law Report","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Queen (butterfly); Economic Justice; Law; Sociology; Biology; Political science; Botany","score_opus":0.006586631673614615,"score_gpt":0.23238556536232835,"score_spread":0.22579893368871373,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4234058516","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01946944,0.004402921,0.0013171316,0.68104297,0.016859137,0.00016419575,0.00079185003,0.00016426889,0.27578804],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.096510805,0.0009838574,0.0007838843,0.5120934,0.002163407,0.0001364443,0.00019470144,0.00012709605,0.38700643],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9940661,0.0005351221,0.00028811747,0.0009103069,0.001623172,0.002577188],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9957487,0.002105923,0.00013871536,0.00015838844,0.0010138814,0.0008344658],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037010498,0.0005252623,0.00096945587,0.0007995333,0.02653173,0.010689012,0.0025527962,0.027414534,0.018780177],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01598029,0.00094678154,0.0010699787,0.00090956927,0.0037730895,0.0036760038,0.0040430496,0.028481167,0.004686309],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000048878235,0.000041992058,0.0010802952,0.00004500054,0.000021071322,0.0014709937,0.0024354197,0.00006521273,0.0005695598,0.1315513,0.8563915,0.006278805],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004206089,0.000034266,0.0032593098,0.00022646574,0.00006828718,0.00048557136,0.0052882303,0.00027614724,0.0012383191,0.026918063,0.96206206,0.000101179125],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.19795176,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.43589395,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8020482,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010149983,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014959707,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3935991},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4234302142","doi":"10.1093/ww/9780199540884.013.7773","title":"Blais, Hon. Jean Jacques, (born 27 June 1940), PC (Can.) 1976; QC (Can.) 1978; Counsel, MBM Intellectual Property Law LLP (formerly Marusyk, Miller &amp; Swain), Ottawa, since 1999","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"reference-entry","venue":"Who's Who","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Miller; Law; Intellectual property; Property (philosophy); Genealogy; Management; History; Political science; Philosophy; Economics; Biology","score_opus":0.030317161747875698,"score_gpt":0.2830266855075744,"score_spread":0.25270952375969874,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4234302142","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00092209753,0.030685866,0.00025499868,0.034978107,0.007457233,0.000048543996,0.003830777,0.00022880372,0.92159355],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0030126907,0.004687401,0.0001197326,0.001270172,0.0004212094,0.000015670026,0.00027055308,0.00008667716,0.9901157],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996177,0.00003381019,0.000018601539,0.00008605005,0.00017148367,0.00007235921],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994797,0.00009313828,0.000041957177,0.000021491069,0.00026845894,0.000095290445],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00040007982,0.00086119806,0.0004186063,0.0012555664,0.003924883,0.0028574197,0.0007285328,0.0022777522,0.25789207],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001449386,0.00045441752,0.00018598586,0.0017533329,0.0011028092,0.002000458,0.001037428,0.0033614617,0.1401673],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008826294,0.0000042327056,0.00009942714,0.00004021202,8.615269e-7,0.000043039166,0.00016720436,0.000019267829,0.00004940412,0.007523099,0.98077434,0.011270183],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000010711076,0.000001171697,0.00026680357,0.00002785478,3.2991917e-7,0.000017945611,0.00004830435,0.0000031778607,0.000023616476,0.00026419942,0.9993436,0.0000019392],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2268931,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.43985543,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.77310693,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0072779343,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0047795638,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8627349},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4234308217","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3006704","title":"Exceptional Procedures to Correct Miscarriages of Justice in Common Law Systems","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Economic Justice; Common law; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.01916179656834591,"score_gpt":0.3359113619956188,"score_spread":0.31674956542727284,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4234308217","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.51826096,0.0033213703,0.37962303,0.0218873,0.0019402616,0.0014946074,0.00045664492,0.0045289686,0.06848678],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93086433,0.00035738535,0.063440874,0.0013172417,0.00022256581,0.00024286064,0.00013961698,0.00014915453,0.0032658728],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.96303016,0.017371478,0.004347946,0.0024527223,0.0083367545,0.0044610966],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.84583753,0.08111467,0.020687787,0.02997564,0.015449531,0.006934891],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.025475398,0.00048028486,0.0008780613,0.0067440444,0.009100921,0.005838145,0.0037226845,0.004877674,0.005172337],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1999059,0.0006282937,0.001173763,0.0022934198,0.00494009,0.0068885544,0.009247907,0.008083084,0.00084153865],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00036955808,0.0009582535,0.07097449,0.0005816732,0.0002537069,0.0038986516,0.016632859,0.014939384,0.0022547487,0.39110574,0.034068435,0.4639625],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00017233248,0.0011293947,0.05487974,0.0028976323,0.0005395749,0.009311747,0.017573282,0.101255395,0.016219184,0.70432997,0.09117005,0.00052171556],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007278175,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012199148,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025475398,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024368416,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01774819,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13472837},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4234546058","doi":"10.1163/1875-8096_pplrdc_ej.9789028609020.177_280.4","title":"II. Mariage","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"dataset","venue":"Collected Courses of the Hague Academy of International Law","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Limit (mathematics); Law; Political science; Humanities; Mathematics; Art; Mathematical analysis","score_opus":0.027105653637920276,"score_gpt":0.35296224775227364,"score_spread":0.32585659411435336,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4234546058","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"dataset","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"dataset","genre_consensus":"dataset","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0017671832,0.00075207994,0.0006245697,0.00078118814,0.00041913718,0.00012844501,0.98562384,0.0020977508,0.0078057484],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0018998014,0.0003129865,0.0011297608,0.0006275934,0.000067516,0.0005875634,0.98973024,0.00048474417,0.005159785],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99693406,0.00068143924,0.00033953678,0.000979773,0.0006026287,0.0004624707],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967997,0.0006448665,0.00024501642,0.0012610169,0.00064896484,0.00040047258],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020800815,0.0022926454,0.001369763,0.004593999,0.0017805853,0.0048482777,0.0023210591,0.0021682149,0.06600029],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01228906,0.00096195546,0.0022876423,0.0045890734,0.00087717234,0.0022619986,0.0043953233,0.002993182,0.18925308],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020398808,0.000056057896,0.0041569676,0.0007267327,0.000048366328,0.00003703851,0.000105769905,0.00020986327,0.00023105972,0.001449195,0.98422134,0.008553683],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012310217,0.0000409623,0.0048812157,0.0004570677,0.00003006871,0.00010940721,0.00025112843,0.00026123316,0.0003674532,0.0013569761,0.9920894,0.000032053646],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010956357,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.024138037,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06600029,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011780333,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032034318,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22079295},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4235012708","doi":"10.1093/ww/9780199540884.013.u174408","title":"Morton, His Honour (Stephen) Alastair, (28 July 1913–9 May 1992), JP; a Circuit Judge (formerly Deputy Chairman, Greater London Quarter Sessions), 1971–87","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"reference-entry","venue":"Who Was Who","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Honour; Quarter (Canadian coin); Art; Art history; Management; Law; History; Political science; Archaeology; Economics","score_opus":0.03611893765986885,"score_gpt":0.3028656891188444,"score_spread":0.26674675145897553,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4235012708","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00460041,0.00836952,0.00052776514,0.082951665,0.024716377,0.00025543067,0.0016627064,0.00025120354,0.87666506],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0050845346,0.00071800867,0.000090780944,0.014123957,0.00050674804,0.000046717374,0.00008172073,0.00004880224,0.9792986],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99900216,0.00009138168,0.000042871085,0.0001910011,0.0002776419,0.00039503982],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99924445,0.00017512047,0.000036385896,0.00003605608,0.00037142506,0.0001366468],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011412705,0.0008336858,0.0005743511,0.00097591564,0.014865701,0.0051418133,0.0015001934,0.010665565,0.09564068],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003748979,0.00089301454,0.0005231752,0.0006517728,0.0015540333,0.002125672,0.0021558283,0.012616779,0.035885446],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025313222,0.000016059892,0.00019338158,0.000031571566,0.0000026550742,0.00022903696,0.00035502133,0.00002608459,0.00012342322,0.012329793,0.9804928,0.0061749844],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000071159916,0.000010791532,0.0010876535,0.000077916295,0.0000040425502,0.000042312935,0.00034444133,0.00002483351,0.00011492452,0.00089652673,0.9973787,0.000010839949],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.25964555,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6008952,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.25964555,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006119779,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009053412,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5162685},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4235059816","doi":"10.22215/etd/2005-10683","title":"A proceduralist theory of supranational law","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University; Canadian Heritage; Library and Archives Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.01866527316592898,"score_gpt":0.33081810352090507,"score_spread":0.3121528303549761,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4235059816","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.012452494,0.001560236,0.2788831,0.029624159,0.0003002234,0.00009617264,0.0002500061,0.0001337455,0.6766998],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.84540284,0.0018011751,0.06323027,0.0046384456,0.00062208786,0.00038609907,0.00024203194,0.00023044467,0.08344653],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99534684,0.0021713362,0.00014723574,0.00063747005,0.0011960984,0.00050089404],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964653,0.0018338149,0.00026798237,0.00070551917,0.0005335706,0.0001937763],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0063765603,0.00040707143,0.0005206125,0.0014691128,0.0032277175,0.008776374,0.0028881896,0.00364541,0.010497681],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0073510716,0.0004719473,0.0012047372,0.002171215,0.018567303,0.0107494015,0.0030463748,0.005366138,0.001514376],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[5.626985e-7,0.0000014961527,0.000011400833,0.0000020706755,5.995313e-7,0.000003546194,0.00010930044,0.00011225358,0.0000068711993,0.9991405,0.0002513307,0.000359947],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000051893885,0.0000025757508,0.00004809652,0.000016341295,0.0000025561476,0.000011674777,0.000104944804,0.00077767856,0.00003038818,0.98437923,0.014619013,0.0000023608507],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00847562,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0068932767,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.010497681,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0064306213,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008092494,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04665768},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4235252376","doi":"10.1007/978-1-4614-6170-8_100091","title":"Guilt by Association","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Association (psychology); Psychology; Psychotherapist","score_opus":0.013973283285943891,"score_gpt":0.26378577728869573,"score_spread":0.24981249400275185,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4235252376","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0011520223,0.0018309017,0.001458656,0.011296857,0.0011613694,0.0000197942,0.00003174327,0.000017297802,0.9830314],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.098747134,0.0020844124,0.0009856839,0.015912866,0.0018212612,0.00013981223,0.000080176,0.000068628615,0.88016003],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966628,0.0012072432,0.000086323744,0.0006086178,0.00090546045,0.0005294485],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988456,0.00042983494,0.00008416337,0.00018598615,0.00029817794,0.00015621433],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002311755,0.0006968211,0.00063836895,0.0009251195,0.006432133,0.006320405,0.00130427,0.0060063936,0.031209383],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0063247727,0.0004260196,0.0004888908,0.0006901135,0.015063069,0.00620275,0.0043200627,0.008896697,0.00959119],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006480073,0.00001065131,0.00011417749,0.000012847111,0.0000050121134,0.00005450577,0.0011454312,0.00006324173,0.00002152112,0.894632,0.09390153,0.010032611],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000886387,0.000010823038,0.00032822028,0.00014758526,0.0000059456047,0.00019017963,0.00095525244,0.0001585751,0.00005961989,0.48285973,0.5152641,0.000011063968],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011114359,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019559734,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.031209383,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0042561707,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0041280105,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10440576},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4235312523","doi":"10.1002/9781444338386.wbeah13161","title":"<i>Legis actio</i>","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"The Encyclopedia of Ancient History","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Lawsuit; Statute; Action (physics); Law; Philosophy; Classics; Political science; Art; Physics","score_opus":0.019928879065593624,"score_gpt":0.2580812322776695,"score_spread":0.23815235321207587,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4235312523","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0003350529,0.00022916852,0.00020102006,0.0020509872,0.0003063147,0.000020315534,0.00091407355,0.000115201416,0.995828],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.028925944,0.00085539796,0.0004650372,0.0037639719,0.00060500926,0.00012351484,0.00167134,0.00045535743,0.9631345],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989002,0.00031841395,0.00006457169,0.00012164492,0.00042049846,0.00017471421],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99877995,0.00034635596,0.00012961114,0.0001750404,0.00044104512,0.00012792605],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007983944,0.00036209886,0.0002750661,0.0019778938,0.0035062914,0.005637379,0.0006979709,0.0017429962,0.24288967],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023081868,0.00017983773,0.00024754446,0.0034055049,0.0015245301,0.002845543,0.0021055278,0.0025148967,0.096505426],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000072989133,0.000014147979,0.00016061134,0.0000924313,0.0000015990356,0.00009055901,0.0012355783,0.000029758032,0.000121078076,0.22714001,0.7529649,0.01814212],"study_design_scores_gemma":[8.8464094e-7,0.0000021519659,0.0002782053,0.00006117417,5.7882755e-7,0.000039925035,0.0003140392,0.000017280921,0.000100870326,0.0023280487,0.99685377,0.0000030935864],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009235974,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.013437247,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24288967,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003103421,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0022100338,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8125469},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4235739477","doi":"10.36019/9780813584256","title":"Sovereign Acts","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Rutgers University Press eBooks","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sovereignty; Political science; Law; Politics","score_opus":0.02851219976296745,"score_gpt":0.2393656655902465,"score_spread":0.21085346582727904,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4235739477","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00028595576,0.0053297193,0.0002792152,0.00312599,0.0013778658,0.000012677543,0.00006179805,0.000024358704,0.98950243],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.015318916,0.00659616,0.00024640493,0.0022736012,0.0009430715,0.000047062058,0.00019342518,0.000057077872,0.9743242],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990088,0.00021401799,0.00004686771,0.00014313521,0.00041269258,0.00017443918],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995542,0.00012070521,0.000028217872,0.00006954653,0.00015848933,0.00006876232],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007482793,0.0007044667,0.00040067884,0.00096258946,0.004156088,0.0063129254,0.00068949716,0.0020056437,0.07865247],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002024738,0.00032360613,0.0003548118,0.0010464211,0.0032784534,0.0047056805,0.0035119154,0.003890984,0.023366896],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000053317776,0.000010992996,0.000053304433,0.00004077742,0.0000015481814,0.000034616955,0.0008729505,0.0000529473,0.000044000597,0.5337322,0.43445885,0.030692466],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000001048458,0.0000021647497,0.000063020765,0.000080885235,6.8147534e-7,0.00002546128,0.0001777512,0.000016359216,0.000019521656,0.010284424,0.9893271,0.0000017595833],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009343369,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015121514,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07865247,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0036326146,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003543758,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26311874},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4236370887","doi":"10.3917/lpm.021.0122","title":"Le carnet d'Hubert Nyssen","year":2007,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"La pensée de midi","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Espace pour la vie","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.012620814750565451,"score_gpt":0.29607097957746725,"score_spread":0.2834501648269018,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4236370887","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0085953735,0.06632524,0.012865424,0.16560833,0.021889886,0.000104490275,0.0026815215,0.00090858986,0.7210212],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.02549916,0.013809579,0.0047496925,0.009346003,0.00084237853,0.00007016719,0.00046106114,0.00039299333,0.9448289],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987931,0.00029766795,0.000060755043,0.00032770776,0.00041477144,0.00010596747],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968611,0.0010689958,0.00025423587,0.0004168649,0.0010454034,0.00035352475],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017335007,0.0009232118,0.00072438625,0.0019128942,0.005235843,0.0041572624,0.0013247132,0.0033683472,0.086090885],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006176226,0.0007151609,0.0003405931,0.0014443067,0.0034590927,0.0047827153,0.0029082445,0.0037377758,0.018834561],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007289296,0.000013881766,0.0010344845,0.00020312062,0.000013441062,0.00034934253,0.0022126979,0.00024271737,0.0005236349,0.20447966,0.72371113,0.06714297],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000001205546,0.0000027942885,0.0003107726,0.00009176114,0.00000142149,0.000072875366,0.0002771954,0.000032569045,0.00010728087,0.0020480617,0.9970464,0.0000076163074],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09016426,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.19722515,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09016426,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0037909534,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0043674465,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28800273},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4236832899","doi":"10.17345/rcda1082","title":"CLARKSON, Stephen, WOOD, Stephen, A Perilous Imbalance. The Globalization and Canadian Law and Governance, UBC Press, Toronto/Vancouver, 2010","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Revista Catalana de Dret Ambiental","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Globalization; Corporate governance; Law; Economic history; Political science; History; Economics; Management","score_opus":0.006107625366688574,"score_gpt":0.2404427049458389,"score_spread":0.2343350795791503,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4236832899","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002638448,0.656532,0.0004441675,0.26610705,0.0032945268,0.000027152179,0.001163931,0.000044179178,0.06974855],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.17508574,0.62740433,0.001723939,0.043837994,0.0032180126,0.00006515242,0.001022871,0.00014321202,0.14749867],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985135,0.00020385957,0.000061095314,0.00009882629,0.000785302,0.00033743016],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99666387,0.0007463669,0.000205507,0.00007510151,0.0017653333,0.00054379395],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013575293,0.001137364,0.00057991676,0.004730809,0.01220788,0.008981752,0.0020593372,0.005346098,0.015490676],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003274294,0.00094195793,0.0003796733,0.013133719,0.008025607,0.0070138937,0.00159996,0.005245864,0.0017844985],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014051852,0.000010866406,0.0011848729,0.00018867341,0.000008040845,0.000077233024,0.0047390647,0.000107576714,0.000037917755,0.046133038,0.9254893,0.02200935],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001670168,0.000007211376,0.015761878,0.0013358918,0.000031798365,0.00010408967,0.017018512,0.00008300493,0.000092741066,0.02256406,0.9429358,0.00004821329],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97832197,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9932353,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06865433,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06865433,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0812856,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49812436},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4237010115","doi":"10.1002/crq.3890180401","title":"Masthead","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"Mediation Quarterly","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University; Royal Roads University; Toronto Public Health","funders":"","keywords":"Citation; Computer science; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.018050015377427217,"score_gpt":0.3128819204824273,"score_spread":0.29483190510500007,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4237010115","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0003270542,0.0005190868,0.0005936847,0.001074857,0.0010147511,0.000052529922,0.001490256,0.0007270069,0.9942008],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0005046037,0.00012667173,0.00010301531,0.00010430917,0.000050222843,0.000011568264,0.00027335013,0.00008276802,0.9987436],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99963164,0.000050183677,0.000018693883,0.000081658916,0.00016621809,0.000051538045],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988236,0.00021035073,0.000049117483,0.00019025074,0.00053829065,0.00018827003],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00052743114,0.00094477745,0.00073250406,0.001970874,0.0028219149,0.004515467,0.0013010163,0.0020791574,0.89641446],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0026433896,0.0006910705,0.00040265237,0.0021551943,0.0005619084,0.003026878,0.0022077153,0.0021259827,0.76093554],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002656914,0.000020634956,0.00008724372,0.000056012566,8.729848e-7,0.000042217365,0.000070508344,0.000032859265,0.00013922481,0.004914382,0.9170416,0.077567846],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000056962626,0.0000074347845,0.00036371293,0.00004536165,0.0000010185989,0.00003244585,0.0000781595,0.000037345268,0.000063145126,0.0009876646,0.99837494,0.00000300737],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005222786,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01672788,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10358554,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008394808,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0012167501,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4237915007","doi":"10.1163/9789087901714_014","title":"Other Titles Of Interest","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"History","score_opus":0.1579199206582472,"score_gpt":0.3550053481163315,"score_spread":0.1970854274580843,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4237915007","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000098055716,0.00077814894,0.00047682674,0.0017538465,0.0033364007,0.00004285952,0.0003639097,0.000112070855,0.9930379],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00067362405,0.00034290654,0.0001792135,0.00086058344,0.0004766828,0.000030133371,0.00024399292,0.000095974574,0.997097],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998762,0.00024110144,0.00005052412,0.00020931201,0.00057243113,0.00016464505],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99730444,0.0006382342,0.00011314514,0.00028104638,0.0012097404,0.00045335255],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014725,0.00078791514,0.00087072654,0.0029815743,0.0024875482,0.0043884953,0.0022074897,0.002416921,0.6416246],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0073304116,0.00036289077,0.00053232186,0.003022903,0.0008521638,0.002646094,0.0028376118,0.0021076428,0.52397454],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013849004,0.000027449365,0.00006590478,0.000096730655,0.0000017236014,0.000049850594,0.00013633157,0.000027426757,0.00014152145,0.03034089,0.9226295,0.04646882],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000021844949,0.0000028003017,0.00003882793,0.00004452336,0.0000010416152,0.00003162202,0.00003885393,0.000017699565,0.000034705034,0.0015217131,0.9982644,0.0000017422758],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035552175,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011177647,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6416246,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018159705,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030696806,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.511179},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4237965811","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198795674.003.0009","title":"Scope of (Remedial) Jurisdiction","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Scope (computer science); Remedial education; Law; Political science; Computer science","score_opus":0.03239930293863498,"score_gpt":0.2640027156571886,"score_spread":0.23160341271855361,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4237965811","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019279746,0.0068068653,0.07973456,0.014854869,0.0005946097,0.0001280574,0.00016137939,0.00020154387,0.87823844],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9275346,0.0028245056,0.010406218,0.003869979,0.0006702225,0.00029053658,0.00016492991,0.00014202803,0.054097034],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98343,0.0059225606,0.0007613723,0.002654715,0.005022375,0.0022089675],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9913378,0.004521911,0.00062951294,0.0017891534,0.0013481502,0.00037348433],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0086582005,0.00047737898,0.0008778948,0.002085085,0.0050328793,0.009712805,0.0027613265,0.005011994,0.011636465],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01715002,0.0004984468,0.0009544257,0.0017032301,0.027570186,0.0107504465,0.009296653,0.006304528,0.0016761436],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000016817838,0.0000023317568,0.000084665146,0.000015926236,0.0000018128698,0.000025972633,0.0009757104,0.00009698856,0.000045821584,0.99419266,0.0010017444,0.0035547456],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009957533,0.000021079575,0.00048482284,0.00028406343,0.0000128916345,0.0002900506,0.0015419067,0.0006011599,0.0002707541,0.79741573,0.19903353,0.000033987322],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006330307,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004764332,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.011636465,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005204599,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0070869303,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04578948},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4238265016","doi":"10.22145/flr.36.3.1","title":"The Dangers of Shared Care Legislation: Why Australia Needs (Yet More) Family Law Reform","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Federal Law Review","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Law reform; Family law; Project commissioning; Law; Political science; Publishing","score_opus":0.07022404376108987,"score_gpt":0.3400619872985388,"score_spread":0.26983794353744894,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4238265016","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09122064,0.014674732,0.001533646,0.8523049,0.0013438674,0.000083128376,0.00004331426,0.00004225951,0.038753476],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.68436265,0.0087363385,0.0041981717,0.27111578,0.0010424182,0.00013446878,0.00005318944,0.000054926393,0.030302117],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97809863,0.008585189,0.00082751794,0.0014668476,0.0069187456,0.004103097],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96366763,0.01403091,0.0031439739,0.0016504789,0.011257779,0.006249245],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02799746,0.00017837997,0.0005453855,0.0012942201,0.009350637,0.007540604,0.002274669,0.009833974,0.005326303],"category_scores_gemma":[0.054068133,0.0005594096,0.0007351306,0.0013294321,0.00827364,0.008163075,0.0055739144,0.011379763,0.00062458724],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000912919,0.0003062134,0.021346526,0.0010576174,0.00007610931,0.002072182,0.05144029,0.0004913274,0.0019403108,0.61180294,0.16772237,0.14165282],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000087634915,0.00040431996,0.08719522,0.003122968,0.000090701404,0.0011339018,0.030049426,0.001726633,0.00092417415,0.08899556,0.7860881,0.00018139547],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.18658645,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2511615,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.18658645,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014802713,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04627138,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37100077},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4238434725","doi":"10.2307/3504925","title":"10.2307/3504925","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Time to knit","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy of law; Political philosophy; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Sociology; Comparative law; Politics","score_opus":0.008358234391410172,"score_gpt":0.22909699235097541,"score_spread":0.22073875795956524,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4238434725","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00035152773,0.00035496612,0.00048248415,0.00030651817,0.00040634163,0.000059179158,0.0011695052,0.0007839613,0.99608564],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0012542186,0.00039087646,0.0006405622,0.00043002257,0.00011579967,0.000041021143,0.001738054,0.00043085424,0.9949587],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993777,0.000052509735,0.000049809656,0.00016889338,0.00025246217,0.00009863939],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99783033,0.00046193,0.00008617023,0.0003978589,0.00052782294,0.0006959539],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00091721036,0.0016179911,0.0011582286,0.0025342337,0.0016553844,0.0050914614,0.0020013037,0.0025727334,0.9844611],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022760069,0.0008079377,0.0008512682,0.0026769636,0.0017605938,0.0057289074,0.0043450072,0.001602517,0.9850515],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00018457622,0.0001762388,0.0005188509,0.0004640927,0.000017271097,0.00019780622,0.00009199352,0.00016882691,0.0017590842,0.0068040974,0.5635043,0.42611295],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026663332,0.000037574046,0.00090241415,0.00020219664,0.0000072609514,0.00022752969,0.0001250053,0.00011645865,0.00023894556,0.0013706952,0.9967282,0.000017011818],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004192462,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004394912,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015538871,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011638612,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0014130325,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.022164285},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4238445777","doi":"10.1017/s0069005800009437","title":"Canadian Cases in Private International Law in 2006–7 / Jurisprudence canadienne en matière de droit international privé en 2006–7","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Yearbook of international Law/Annuaire canadien de droit international","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Plaintiff; Jurisdiction; Law; Jurisprudence; Political science; Corporation; Business","score_opus":0.00830340332927449,"score_gpt":0.24646524195460523,"score_spread":0.23816183862533075,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4238445777","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010961046,0.01184931,0.00052459206,0.02136943,0.00096241693,0.000116038325,0.0007461444,0.00008816222,0.95338285],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.27140534,0.011169358,0.0020072649,0.030641198,0.00065241783,0.0001686526,0.00090034347,0.0001330985,0.68292236],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9925338,0.00038879426,0.0001920108,0.00053965044,0.0037657456,0.0025799258],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969273,0.0007315514,0.00023641379,0.00023893382,0.0011795341,0.00068625994],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033268852,0.00070577237,0.00058125204,0.0034908077,0.022031108,0.0112537835,0.0027716826,0.00967524,0.01691217],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008276814,0.0009683149,0.0007630243,0.007054998,0.009104073,0.002297173,0.003415164,0.008304748,0.001552351],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018368513,0.00003651803,0.0007875947,0.00008291116,0.000009647557,0.00053571706,0.00522453,0.00023726471,0.00017487664,0.7612363,0.22187035,0.009785975],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000118193175,0.0000064544884,0.003367571,0.0001647194,0.0000117622285,0.00012594918,0.0012996887,0.00017343136,0.00016472599,0.0061474647,0.98848766,0.00003871512],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98419154,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9896979,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12899241,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.12899241,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.114640765,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9359098},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4238554487","doi":"10.1787/3f9aa177-en","title":"Directorate for Legal Affairs","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Secretary-General's report to Ministers","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"African Union; China Scholarship Council; European Commission","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.0298367888729463,"score_gpt":0.30493274423607647,"score_spread":0.27509595536313014,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4238554487","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00023327928,0.005953403,0.00051499496,0.008076123,0.0043154308,0.00009241746,0.0012347101,0.00040584223,0.9791738],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0012827025,0.0021303054,0.00032293593,0.0012970457,0.00051391154,0.000049816525,0.0005310835,0.00012687377,0.9937453],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9990356,0.00013568273,0.000062316605,0.00016651297,0.0004393878,0.00016059857],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99880624,0.00018984509,0.0000692124,0.00009967659,0.00064271863,0.00019237165],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013286992,0.00061149907,0.0004936356,0.0018077845,0.0032290155,0.0069202953,0.001072219,0.0028514767,0.31471184],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0024595077,0.00041091576,0.0003105208,0.0021353564,0.0008225909,0.004044707,0.0020131175,0.0039576394,0.23392144],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000031920108,0.000008364213,0.000039323993,0.000053801883,5.168967e-7,0.000025774207,0.00011424246,0.000014440574,0.000051544503,0.03185177,0.9416834,0.026153699],"study_design_scores_gemma":[4.6846438e-7,4.91398e-7,0.000027998267,0.000018890847,2.2318245e-7,0.0000116251795,0.000018244362,0.0000033297395,0.0000073108713,0.00026256588,0.9996482,6.299538e-7],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015504966,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02442732,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31471184,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004935685,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0069834203,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9774804},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4238561584","doi":"10.1007/978-1-4614-6170-8_100280","title":"Legal Issues and Implications","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law and economics; Engineering ethics; Sociology; Engineering","score_opus":0.026284949334195926,"score_gpt":0.31595168043066735,"score_spread":0.2896667310964714,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4238561584","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0008790791,0.011520024,0.0014924192,0.08936848,0.0032775125,0.000032078806,0.000045819965,0.000016853412,0.8933678],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.100118555,0.019493576,0.003512731,0.10015934,0.007261198,0.00040028806,0.00015626414,0.00011172744,0.7687863],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960616,0.0017987164,0.00010890172,0.00041351482,0.001114741,0.0005025106],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9968876,0.0019568673,0.00008611928,0.0001680927,0.0006627394,0.00023845084],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0054405057,0.0005533699,0.0006600378,0.0021153118,0.007667289,0.010087277,0.0023118749,0.010150073,0.04339447],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010095361,0.0003453676,0.00045714856,0.0017010682,0.020293277,0.009431263,0.004690436,0.009436183,0.0057038623],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000015381767,0.000008368095,0.000012674683,0.0000146653865,6.2321914e-7,0.00002313857,0.0004926855,0.00004137026,0.000011320833,0.9547635,0.039470643,0.0051595187],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000042461847,0.0000034143532,0.000073321506,0.0003124672,0.0000022300474,0.000057198882,0.001644439,0.00008017122,0.000032534484,0.56423277,0.43355,0.0000071612258],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01407155,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.022111515,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04339447,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008002089,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009668801,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14516896},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4238683523","doi":"10.1163/2210-7975_hrd-0126-0014","title":"canadian-lawyer-vol32-issue-5-may-2008-62-pp","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"dataset","venue":"Human Rights Documents online","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.02051945768696951,"score_gpt":0.34837898340845347,"score_spread":0.32785952572148397,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4238683523","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"dataset","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"dataset","genre_consensus":"dataset","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00018643963,0.00012840967,0.000040034025,0.00041109533,0.00011289602,0.000008169399,0.9955329,0.0002899074,0.0032901992],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0008489149,0.00021978351,0.00019577221,0.00014727449,0.000028579449,0.00004887892,0.9877893,0.0001378515,0.010583619],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987324,0.00011926011,0.000115849434,0.00019421641,0.0005204385,0.0003178608],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99467224,0.0011685231,0.00037860777,0.0010634785,0.001894603,0.0008225766],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017053027,0.0016910085,0.0014991602,0.006522666,0.0016298331,0.0064970297,0.0025251254,0.002105676,0.18302423],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0102720335,0.0009447613,0.0012024621,0.0100738965,0.00086635695,0.002228922,0.0019755166,0.0027628122,0.18463168],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014581469,0.00000861374,0.0005576979,0.00007657534,0.000005067143,0.000005861475,0.000007501547,0.00005477574,0.000010063627,0.00029707004,0.99753916,0.0014229992],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009028605,0.0000060431726,0.006074325,0.00030647806,0.000011385586,0.000029765768,0.000112012305,0.00026712683,0.00015242521,0.0008622569,0.9920657,0.00002211846],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.30886847,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.49666145,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.69113153,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0071301395,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009998658,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.61414135},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4239264341","doi":"10.1515/9780822392170-003","title":"Note on Language","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Linguistics; History; Computer science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.026439676758386103,"score_gpt":0.30687005885796514,"score_spread":0.28043038209957905,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4239264341","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0009951651,0.004132191,0.0016496523,0.027126038,0.013161672,0.00008524637,0.0021826015,0.00028357984,0.9503838],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.031379927,0.004474427,0.0018817841,0.019335397,0.005575244,0.0003058204,0.0024273945,0.0010578749,0.9335621],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99770266,0.00071583356,0.00021073817,0.00039289362,0.0006065484,0.0003712803],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973537,0.00090286636,0.00014912056,0.0003577766,0.001033993,0.00020259152],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015590837,0.000794713,0.00056187226,0.0017325445,0.004947401,0.006932395,0.001601212,0.0017839303,0.22569254],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006958159,0.00029459572,0.00043658153,0.0023221902,0.002752721,0.0060390467,0.004563054,0.004335596,0.13534604],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027243232,0.000011688908,0.00015978329,0.000109841436,0.0000020990522,0.00010174912,0.0030135673,0.000026767104,0.00025077842,0.2224738,0.743479,0.030343652],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000010633639,0.0000021968117,0.00008794914,0.00006698709,3.8988617e-7,0.000025005766,0.00041980523,0.000008165019,0.000029852274,0.002254877,0.99710125,0.000002493153],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016794305,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018466953,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22569254,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003436152,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030353782,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.75501674},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4239346953","doi":"10.1177/201395251100200202","title":"Collective Action in Labour Conflicts under the Rome II Regulation (Part II)","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Labour Law Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Undo; Action (physics); Interpretation (philosophy); Relation (database); Phenomenon; Labour law; Law and economics; Law; Collective action; Focus (optics); Industrial action; Conflict of laws; Political science; Sociology; Epistemology; Computer science; Philosophy; Linguistics","score_opus":0.06869349735759056,"score_gpt":0.28998700595435706,"score_spread":0.2212935085967665,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4239346953","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12500556,0.008081314,0.011743552,0.023359725,0.001312686,0.00029478496,0.000108178414,0.00005689061,0.83003736],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9377614,0.0014207623,0.002718176,0.005176289,0.0008118387,0.0004681077,0.000064586624,0.000016943028,0.0515619],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99565387,0.0015361634,0.00020944177,0.00047243104,0.00072885165,0.0013991663],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99847597,0.0008039427,0.00026802192,0.0002371313,0.00010349427,0.00011148281],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030285777,0.00032293797,0.000491049,0.000733068,0.003355328,0.0059113326,0.0011006497,0.0057568066,0.0030172076],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029878234,0.00027767598,0.0011147344,0.00047774185,0.010178138,0.0016653752,0.0042260755,0.0036031408,0.0006303996],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017132692,0.000028856064,0.00075430877,0.00006920956,0.0000084710555,0.00026960822,0.0026696539,0.0007494562,0.00048660953,0.98167026,0.006010477,0.007265832],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000111867215,0.00024086794,0.017840445,0.0011240186,0.000064178756,0.00094454194,0.005072343,0.003982188,0.002453217,0.5902994,0.3777309,0.00013597234],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0072960644,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0064459983,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0072960644,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0042420323,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030581972,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03077823},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4239515316","doi":"10.1163/1875-8096_pplrdc_ej.9789028609020.177_280","title":"La conception du droit international privé d'après la doctrine et la pratique au Canada (Volume 053)","year":2014,"lang":"fr","type":"dataset","venue":"Collected Courses of the Hague Academy of International Law","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Conflict of laws; Doctrine; Political science; Law; Philosophy; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.01202237686975697,"score_gpt":0.2854950348615887,"score_spread":0.27347265799183174,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4239515316","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"dataset","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"dataset","genre_consensus":"dataset","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0009587236,0.0003176643,0.00008249629,0.00021812622,0.000040834344,0.000009727583,0.99667776,0.00012273838,0.0015719804],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.002433495,0.0002301359,0.00024203911,0.00006108057,0.000013504184,0.00005035149,0.99488443,0.000045552984,0.0020393694],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99834406,0.00018419302,0.00012626895,0.00034613747,0.0005905923,0.00040873853],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99530965,0.001090532,0.00041710047,0.0005976449,0.0020743764,0.00051078975],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012771848,0.0014247843,0.0010140211,0.0097012995,0.0019093379,0.0052390103,0.0021572001,0.0016037723,0.030011661],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008690294,0.00075169053,0.001342677,0.01358939,0.0009157896,0.001415535,0.0018114039,0.0025806807,0.02033005],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000043259526,0.00002239131,0.005854113,0.00031375192,0.000031999673,0.0000197316,0.000115820614,0.00029201698,0.000048414742,0.0020040893,0.9868286,0.0044257343],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008425569,0.000008838763,0.04303068,0.00056101265,0.00003815075,0.00004317542,0.00046795016,0.0005963196,0.0002845024,0.0013289629,0.9535157,0.000040415685],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8390826,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.88363194,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1609174,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011566128,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.021249099,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3237301},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4240019898","doi":"10.4337/9781848445024.00006","title":"Table of jurisprudence","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Edward Elgar Publishing eBooks","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"General Motors of Canada; Jaguar Land Rover; Université Laval; Mattel; RAND Corporation; Loblaw Companies Limited; McDonald's Corporation","keywords":"Table (database); Jurisprudence; Law; Computer science; Political science; Database","score_opus":0.032279226762637794,"score_gpt":0.2693124874955256,"score_spread":0.23703326073288783,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4240019898","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00025036675,0.029892797,0.00097568723,0.004890205,0.0024738489,0.00005081491,0.0005564727,0.00011681986,0.960793],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.012327749,0.0269103,0.0036535962,0.0054801595,0.0026383,0.00022865627,0.0011751703,0.000342144,0.947244],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980057,0.0004703563,0.00012906484,0.00024273271,0.0009984877,0.0001535792],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981623,0.000874899,0.0000662298,0.00018231157,0.0005726867,0.00014152638],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014594349,0.00080601336,0.0013227736,0.0055179754,0.0035202708,0.0091482885,0.0014804918,0.003418499,0.102789365],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004016671,0.00081073225,0.0004032126,0.005872296,0.0025637394,0.0037892861,0.0015442733,0.0053740717,0.04560794],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009165598,0.000032851924,0.00006000772,0.00019339958,0.0000037882014,0.000055067438,0.00039375664,0.000115026036,0.000078985926,0.49828637,0.42073718,0.08003441],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000025392176,0.0000047170856,0.00010072934,0.00023535515,0.0000015403234,0.00003626775,0.00008165054,0.000037965525,0.000022422317,0.033177298,0.96629566,0.0000038871685],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008125366,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012111957,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.102789365,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0045288727,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006157633,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.34386468},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4240545051","doi":"10.1163/37612_wna_adm_adm_1_506_261h","title":"ADM 1/506/261h - from W Barrie, Jno Browy, T Watts","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"dataset","venue":"Warfare in North America, c. 1756-1815","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Art","score_opus":0.02391878310259153,"score_gpt":0.2915504308450175,"score_spread":0.267631647742426,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4240545051","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"dataset","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"dataset","genre_consensus":"dataset","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000027210042,0.000028306302,0.000023052991,0.000053865457,0.000021541242,0.0000048815077,0.9991272,0.00006141013,0.00065250596],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0002842048,0.00005516765,0.00014679616,0.00010814475,0.000016151942,0.00006264067,0.9976682,0.000056813267,0.0016018394],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99919194,0.00013224622,0.000107846914,0.00022955092,0.00018899296,0.00014943117],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966009,0.00095638365,0.0004410926,0.00053130265,0.0009923865,0.00047792465],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010744142,0.0014341834,0.0013816436,0.0032148168,0.00096109015,0.0025356552,0.0025938794,0.0021523938,0.27943787],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009634462,0.0006732556,0.0010132659,0.005643209,0.00039350244,0.0014607093,0.0021090284,0.0016258886,0.23606943],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025714158,0.0000065759755,0.0004776757,0.00028401116,0.000009342736,0.0000066797807,0.0000072080384,0.00006363471,0.000013840536,0.00023027643,0.9978835,0.0009914722],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028372725,0.000014153808,0.004045356,0.00052317104,0.000024086494,0.00003567893,0.000062655396,0.00015203809,0.00008288049,0.0011408692,0.9936161,0.00001932435],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03930063,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07481979,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.27943787,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0013104709,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024444622,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9348128},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4240812274","doi":"10.25071/1925-5624.40381","title":"Note from the Editor","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Tusaaji A Translation Review","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"History","score_opus":0.066109807796035,"score_gpt":0.3453535359672862,"score_spread":0.2792437281712512,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4240812274","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00009412395,0.0033103193,0.00014830602,0.4825542,0.5109488,0.000033276232,0.00006651132,0.00004247369,0.0028020209],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0014046038,0.0021528243,0.00018304397,0.6886523,0.28357834,0.00007208943,0.00002672988,0.00004292281,0.02388724],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99483156,0.00096141297,0.00071485573,0.0010080447,0.0020468826,0.00043714323],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.975315,0.008584478,0.0017579063,0.0009846395,0.010762449,0.002595558],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0057505737,0.0013090738,0.0019051979,0.0017088335,0.0034543083,0.0054950067,0.002880614,0.02102169,0.015871273],"category_scores_gemma":[0.057911295,0.0009159218,0.0016863894,0.00095909694,0.0021286802,0.0038389282,0.0025398473,0.029380348,0.0132952705],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000106713605,0.0000040373066,0.00004845196,0.000047544498,0.0000073597535,0.00021446924,0.000034822104,0.0000092569235,0.00003818112,0.00041050193,0.99659616,0.002578553],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019246541,0.000012625899,0.00030494275,0.00022484767,0.000019166644,0.00040206194,0.00010818682,0.000045487428,0.000117270494,0.00062819425,0.9980907,0.000027342332],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00713484,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01234726,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02102169,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002837544,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0065336945,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.053094745},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4240824345","doi":"10.1163/1570-6664_iyb_sim_org_40510","title":"University of Toronto Faculty of Law","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"dataset","venue":"International Year Book and Statesmen's Who's Who","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Library science; Sociology; Political science; Media studies; Computer science","score_opus":0.01397937474049559,"score_gpt":0.29564319088668084,"score_spread":0.28166381614618524,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4240824345","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"dataset","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"dataset","genre_consensus":"dataset","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00031411208,0.00017647537,0.00007065854,0.00013141918,0.000032522043,0.000008347103,0.9965366,0.00031568782,0.0024141679],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0016606365,0.00029181386,0.0003486927,0.00005331783,0.000017670827,0.000065481436,0.9911601,0.00013520663,0.006267105],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99857676,0.00015139683,0.00011337217,0.00036899254,0.0005191287,0.0002704191],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99432915,0.0011029682,0.0005602697,0.0011276182,0.0019525405,0.00092732493],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011541409,0.001607351,0.0014010326,0.006756955,0.0013254011,0.0040293476,0.0015994094,0.0012395799,0.10193646],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012344963,0.00087693334,0.0007716476,0.010770201,0.00069482945,0.001352329,0.0021214837,0.0018320804,0.122778066],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029342184,0.000010599141,0.0018798296,0.00017235182,0.000010980634,0.00001288287,0.000025214558,0.0001630175,0.000018681254,0.00042007116,0.99334186,0.003915139],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000100160745,0.000013027003,0.013492417,0.0003129389,0.000028843733,0.000051316638,0.00016281666,0.0006738196,0.00017440777,0.0012078357,0.9837563,0.00002622888],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.19565296,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.30768672,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.89806354,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003234307,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009102827,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38902825},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4241033154","doi":"10.1186/1916-0216-43-3","title":"Reviewer acknowledgement 2013","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Acknowledgement; Otorhinolaryngology; Head and neck surgery; General surgery; Medicine; Volume (thermodynamics); Library science; Surgery; Computer science","score_opus":0.027564179049071557,"score_gpt":0.3029760507050092,"score_spread":0.27541187165593767,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4241033154","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00013735639,0.001990342,0.001053172,0.23316598,0.7567745,0.00022677687,0.0007485307,0.0004531687,0.005450275],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.009612299,0.0051730974,0.0044404888,0.4207087,0.43970725,0.0019891271,0.0016659237,0.0019046114,0.114798516],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97003585,0.006856865,0.0051640593,0.0028552525,0.013730972,0.0013570165],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.37961727,0.02378438,0.01196329,0.0060700164,0.5702177,0.0083471965],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02582574,0.0017239224,0.0023048676,0.0068183406,0.0039087366,0.007644963,0.003634726,0.009133423,0.065772034],"category_scores_gemma":[0.36394525,0.0009474232,0.0018763962,0.00349008,0.0021903338,0.0042552114,0.0033025932,0.0075020557,0.0424296],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008960923,0.000001198957,0.00005977069,0.00012126123,0.000002879016,0.000047453712,0.00006382161,0.000006317972,0.00002139345,0.00015038691,0.9972282,0.0022882205],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002590843,0.000010100686,0.00044582834,0.0011695917,0.000022306449,0.00037707764,0.00036915412,0.00007594438,0.0001060894,0.00069089216,0.99665976,0.00004741296],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01159116,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01978348,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97417426,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006207793,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014033595,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22002935},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4241228602","doi":"10.1017/s0069005800011036","title":"Index of Cases / Index de la jurisprudence","year":2013,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Yearbook of international Law/Annuaire canadien de droit international","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Index (typography); Computer science","score_opus":0.007563593112254729,"score_gpt":0.2599177418427528,"score_spread":0.25235414873049805,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4241228602","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0028246143,0.016056232,0.0036039,0.0031739918,0.0013215239,0.00036655736,0.029064277,0.00086103496,0.9427279],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.11765755,0.07490881,0.030002695,0.0023726865,0.0040921485,0.0013283375,0.08777642,0.0021386808,0.67972267],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99509734,0.00061670924,0.0005352879,0.00039933366,0.002964818,0.0003865213],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961355,0.001079248,0.00045465195,0.0005463869,0.0014180645,0.00036613646],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021979492,0.00076919363,0.00086209335,0.027105311,0.0031099853,0.008588583,0.0014128718,0.001356427,0.12593025],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008696203,0.0006883958,0.000538009,0.02070268,0.0014392567,0.004550775,0.0021878341,0.0020218752,0.0493458],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033603133,0.000053016214,0.0010202632,0.0004607106,0.000012123402,0.00018948484,0.0005808652,0.00017065242,0.00046233606,0.19689642,0.65055406,0.14956649],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004686049,0.000005275736,0.0018843877,0.00025375228,0.0000044264507,0.00029344045,0.00025943737,0.00013687005,0.00021392737,0.015951434,0.980981,0.000011326248],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019191794,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017502168,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12593025,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0074642813,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004106681,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.42127866},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4241336499","doi":"10.4095/301343","title":"Families with Children Living at Home, 1996 - Common-law couples with children living at home","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"report","venue":"","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Developmental psychology; Sociology; Gerontology; Medicine","score_opus":0.015432594256732846,"score_gpt":0.26993175529211794,"score_spread":0.2544991610353851,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4241336499","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.95141274,0.0020779285,0.00010988174,0.00092258357,0.000047429538,0.00023879673,0.013580313,0.0000218761,0.031588517],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9307334,0.007948846,0.0004314853,0.0007429569,0.00005938236,0.00048038532,0.018573675,0.000013764733,0.04101607],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99950385,0.00005928384,0.000046463596,0.000055912544,0.00015997772,0.00017451597],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99923754,0.00005941088,0.00021637048,0.00004667876,0.0001904567,0.00024953875],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005754119,0.00029325008,0.0001739945,0.001635915,0.0032103367,0.00065525464,0.0006356827,0.00036313612,0.007324366],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013518274,0.00027493865,0.00017492153,0.0025726012,0.0005112104,0.00056973816,0.0015522756,0.00058883853,0.0007425677],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011975822,0.0002340543,0.92255086,0.00014138177,0.000034758155,0.0038467098,0.0141612515,0.00014094074,0.000615086,0.0010009882,0.020854408,0.036299784],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002401555,0.000056025852,0.9558127,0.00011733127,0.0000144143105,0.0022905737,0.012875351,0.000042554188,0.00022451092,0.00009638521,0.028427565,0.000018570987],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6462244,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.83204395,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6462244,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004358134,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0042906376,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.71171814},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4241932694","doi":"10.1017/s0714980800017128","title":"CJG volume 27 issue 1 Cover and Back matter","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"paratext","venue":"Canadian Journal on Aging / La Revue canadienne du vieillissement","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institute of Aging","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research","keywords":"Cover (algebra); Volume (thermodynamics); Content (measure theory); Action (physics); Computer science; Environmental science; Mathematics; Engineering; Physics; Mechanical engineering; Thermodynamics","score_opus":0.012351670177991006,"score_gpt":0.23817557371660042,"score_spread":0.22582390353860943,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4241932694","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00077121163,0.0064241746,0.0003970141,0.04021674,0.49944672,0.00024568598,0.0010297071,0.00060009887,0.4508686],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.004685336,0.0072504915,0.0005630269,0.019301828,0.12970454,0.00012598137,0.001106864,0.0005605907,0.83670133],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974814,0.0003042461,0.00016145787,0.00017868007,0.0016389625,0.00023528864],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9873679,0.002209889,0.00049604545,0.0006028211,0.007157893,0.0021654828],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.002084245,0.0010780842,0.0011116136,0.0033347146,0.0023900624,0.006466384,0.0011640515,0.0034060373,0.5611818],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017397767,0.00035912995,0.00068814395,0.0022212784,0.0010133017,0.0020192186,0.0013826296,0.002835273,0.40583894],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008728974,0.000009154466,0.000038443213,0.00006118838,0.0000012159284,0.00003371572,0.000006032094,0.0000076085526,0.00004500193,0.0002417897,0.98834884,0.011198358],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011440961,0.000009226244,0.000429102,0.00015998154,0.0000021548058,0.00011118764,0.00003524908,0.00003623327,0.000059360504,0.00042255712,0.99871886,0.0000046809155],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026610582,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0042054798,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43881822,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021874427,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035311482,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6259209},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4242352726","doi":"10.1046/j.1525-1497.18.s1.2.x","title":"Precourses","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of General Internal Medicine","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Family medicine","score_opus":0.03146099782636478,"score_gpt":0.36305049893967956,"score_spread":0.33158950111331476,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4242352726","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0023379116,0.0028431045,0.001247334,0.0482376,0.035315637,0.00015887892,0.000749728,0.0003183015,0.9087916],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0077294447,0.0005684716,0.0003452902,0.010205485,0.0028354218,0.00005966188,0.00023150217,0.00008705773,0.97793764],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99756706,0.0003872102,0.00010335511,0.00031111462,0.0010777035,0.00055360026],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9920473,0.0007326078,0.00021184652,0.00078384747,0.0026740367,0.003550403],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020789912,0.00035137346,0.00040668028,0.0016040342,0.0046669273,0.0042770994,0.0016632782,0.0028516583,0.4177839],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011584754,0.00026573677,0.00048625816,0.00082647573,0.0010115645,0.002078547,0.004779405,0.003432813,0.13966306],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003563158,0.000039567265,0.00042435047,0.00005731037,0.0000026076839,0.00025755074,0.00031697264,0.00002158207,0.00017045482,0.02086388,0.9089513,0.06885884],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000030578174,0.000006764896,0.00023847898,0.000033992867,9.878689e-7,0.000086874126,0.00014072636,0.000010594846,0.000040230974,0.0019759669,0.99745995,0.0000022987444],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004704247,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014589529,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4177839,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002054156,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0070060045,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4243302066","doi":"10.1017/cbo9781139057387.001","title":"Note on the text","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Content (measure theory); Computer science; Information retrieval; World Wide Web; Mathematics","score_opus":0.04294638317180457,"score_gpt":0.23362169383886533,"score_spread":0.19067531066706075,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4243302066","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0003179839,0.0032364142,0.0029938004,0.013747554,0.033438362,0.00044205243,0.0085684545,0.001984708,0.93527067],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0007313082,0.0012688135,0.0009061326,0.0025739237,0.0022452774,0.00010238439,0.002157285,0.0006778036,0.98933697],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991166,0.000080001526,0.000048455677,0.000105975414,0.0005887158,0.000060250724],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99670726,0.0008962753,0.000121948484,0.00029495847,0.0017740465,0.0002055736],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000717986,0.000839834,0.00074023294,0.0020409264,0.0018970501,0.0029559052,0.001233379,0.0017866241,0.6038131],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008065508,0.00043463713,0.00066140114,0.0020201115,0.0007288283,0.0029497521,0.0016684248,0.0029084133,0.49533492],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000074030086,0.0000058867736,0.000015008196,0.00007268395,7.30526e-7,0.000018458546,0.000028349716,0.00002432087,0.00012172826,0.0038893747,0.98061,0.015205961],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000013733635,0.000003634662,0.000072526636,0.000056389505,7.705591e-7,0.000021646332,0.000018440354,0.0000114720315,0.000068544614,0.0008540138,0.9988882,0.0000029105954],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008222235,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0113222115,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6038131,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018744726,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021241363,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5651125},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4243388527","doi":"10.1080/00358530902760549","title":"Book Reviews","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Round Table","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Commonwealth; Appeal; Law; Jurisdiction; Supreme court; Political science; Sociology","score_opus":0.031067223381341512,"score_gpt":0.32478701842220403,"score_spread":0.29371979504086254,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4243388527","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00026479978,0.02528293,0.001258856,0.008534153,0.021871364,0.0002072515,0.0042242487,0.0015024922,0.9368538],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.001337928,0.014566328,0.0009188993,0.004663237,0.0052597127,0.00008938053,0.0030234407,0.00056992023,0.9695711],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99886394,0.000101243524,0.00006630834,0.00019059985,0.00068056496,0.000097412965],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99763715,0.00031499896,0.00010316255,0.00024657373,0.0012619307,0.00043628382],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00059869734,0.00096797507,0.0011173504,0.0030388015,0.0011702948,0.006618687,0.00212874,0.0024121555,0.7538292],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004355654,0.0004730088,0.00078345666,0.0031624234,0.0005321811,0.0036894162,0.0021246294,0.0024283817,0.7342086],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000074625946,0.000015408934,0.000030574764,0.00021068536,0.0000022575687,0.000031802152,0.000020332425,0.000025032909,0.00009867366,0.001843401,0.93258494,0.065129474],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000020573502,0.000003913014,0.000050387884,0.0001062261,0.0000012274659,0.000044375938,0.00001584423,0.000007152249,0.00002073424,0.0003999762,0.99934584,0.0000021686806],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026259331,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0046150037,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7538292,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015507828,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024083469,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.35113275},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4243725796","doi":"10.1007/978-3-319-06910-4","title":"Introduction to Law","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Law Foundation of Nova Scotia","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.012874173753651175,"score_gpt":0.28247392631571394,"score_spread":0.26959975256206276,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4243725796","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00015246602,0.005123292,0.0026193468,0.003966261,0.0010586601,0.000035129375,0.00014066283,0.00010050332,0.9868038],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0036716193,0.003953368,0.0013836112,0.0027159816,0.00069355115,0.0000764127,0.00014323913,0.00012696626,0.98723525],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99917454,0.00018940194,0.000028122757,0.00010378846,0.00042638413,0.00007769283],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99944836,0.00024033157,0.000018615121,0.000060218674,0.0001858882,0.000046659232],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006863003,0.0008703733,0.0006525335,0.002243296,0.0026745268,0.0048107347,0.0011984742,0.0023949745,0.11543256],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025033418,0.00049022405,0.00042198904,0.0018407791,0.004068215,0.0055748923,0.0021513023,0.004207163,0.044983726],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000029317537,0.000022016797,0.000038778973,0.00004785286,0.0000014718943,0.000030789975,0.0003195393,0.00014300224,0.000040890223,0.47773713,0.47657856,0.045037013],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000001305072,0.0000025509803,0.000047060625,0.00010858967,8.832168e-7,0.000027571114,0.00009336568,0.000059824793,0.000017739545,0.09911395,0.90052354,0.0000036459094],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01013862,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02383622,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11543256,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0040713283,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004450638,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.38616037},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4243792749","doi":"10.1093/ww/9780199540884.013.u18635","title":"Hall, Her Honour Jean Graham, (26 March 1917–14 March 2005), a Circuit Judge (formerly Deputy Chairman, South-East London Quarter Sessions), 1971–89","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"reference-entry","venue":"Who Was Who","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Honour; Quarter (Canadian coin); Management; Political science; Law; History; Archaeology; Economics","score_opus":0.04260345588085104,"score_gpt":0.30596902971586704,"score_spread":0.263365573835016,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4243792749","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004415307,0.012735462,0.00059696124,0.30173558,0.062126923,0.00031288367,0.0022280747,0.0003051275,0.61554366],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0049961433,0.0010336775,0.00011703184,0.04952973,0.0009447933,0.000071593844,0.000103996616,0.00006382383,0.94313926],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99861586,0.00015046656,0.00006534283,0.0002265415,0.00040017985,0.0005415386],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99851376,0.00032613848,0.0000590344,0.00005318558,0.000663874,0.0003839715],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018937349,0.00067158916,0.0007590884,0.00083945435,0.016288918,0.006688453,0.0018435874,0.013428671,0.062855095],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0058621,0.00080247084,0.00051753456,0.0006514222,0.0017093705,0.0024575393,0.0024127788,0.01343501,0.024273487],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010374304,0.0000070388305,0.00011934801,0.000015780333,0.0000014442156,0.00010557194,0.00018010773,0.000014187647,0.00003226048,0.0048679714,0.9916244,0.0030214405],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000066919724,0.000008695434,0.0008366482,0.00008124852,0.0000032856012,0.000035258654,0.0006026393,0.000024013008,0.00006951994,0.0008506072,0.9974688,0.0000125391225],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.26311213,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.62641233,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.26311213,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0079317065,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014969252,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5231613},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W424419290","doi":"10.7202/043792ar","title":"GÉRALD GOLDSTEIN et ETHEL GROFFIER, Traité de droit civil – Droit international privé, t. 2, Cowansville, Éditions Yvon Blais, 2003, 1 253 p., ISBN 2-89451-676-2.","year":2004,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Les Cahiers de droit","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Trait; Political science; Philosophy; Computer science","score_opus":0.010452086148816207,"score_gpt":0.2592442953242487,"score_spread":0.2487922091754325,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W424419290","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0003343209,0.90826654,0.0013894395,0.023617351,0.0053509637,0.000024381769,0.0004378426,0.00022754968,0.060351606],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.007443928,0.668655,0.002306615,0.0063244035,0.00330333,0.000061926745,0.0005514754,0.00036176556,0.31099162],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99911636,0.00016290296,0.00006945735,0.00014079898,0.000442593,0.00006792859],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990308,0.00046511393,0.00013189657,0.000029890452,0.00024904447,0.00009325391],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001170844,0.001884677,0.0009754335,0.0038161266,0.0011174136,0.002581318,0.0013172238,0.002940845,0.07956186],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023390306,0.00072507176,0.00038704622,0.0044405838,0.0011766198,0.0062361537,0.0012385402,0.0026233392,0.058528103],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023370352,0.000010692077,0.00012816605,0.0006210285,0.000008295966,0.00004995189,0.00046951487,0.000079067904,0.00015842824,0.0058203125,0.8974936,0.09513754],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005091803,0.000006656161,0.00070467964,0.00039618107,0.000005118307,0.00020261791,0.00032981482,0.00003334346,0.000104617444,0.0022646836,0.9959352,0.000011985547],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.026710587,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04734603,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07956186,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022940245,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015644431,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2661609},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4244296500","doi":"10.21991/c9h66z","title":"PROCEEDINGS OF THE 1996 PLURALT CONFERENCE - SHOULD WE KEEP TALKING?","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Engineering ethics; Political science; Engineering","score_opus":0.061589044021180525,"score_gpt":0.283101541909172,"score_spread":0.2215124978879915,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4244296500","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007168452,0.0065949825,0.0005875644,0.89840895,0.024871746,0.00006578029,0.00012225585,0.000025250078,0.06215501],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1556512,0.006711983,0.0020625994,0.37129337,0.027865047,0.0005886352,0.00037601974,0.00028826942,0.4351629],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9756383,0.008476374,0.0016548441,0.002270646,0.006814118,0.0051458576],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97088057,0.014209748,0.0018584838,0.0015915802,0.0047047986,0.0067548784],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0344421,0.0008907659,0.0016286698,0.0012944173,0.0293595,0.027742058,0.0045653814,0.048569545,0.029668998],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08691797,0.0009682687,0.0015785324,0.0021223612,0.010238759,0.015716229,0.011388753,0.036828976,0.005121972],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002123112,0.00018996657,0.0011023761,0.000254982,0.00004258768,0.00108624,0.010724926,0.00025996123,0.0009774786,0.16307181,0.78557867,0.03649874],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005023857,0.000028341161,0.0015140187,0.0003881186,0.000017265622,0.000120462275,0.009329041,0.00010232387,0.00041088293,0.019103942,0.9688728,0.00006249042],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03856961,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.064644635,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.970331,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0153462505,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.022773234,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18214941},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4244735823","doi":"10.1163/9789401204613_008","title":"Legal Authority and Ethical Platforms: The Ottawa Treaty Comes to Fruition","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Treaty; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.05314283259170686,"score_gpt":0.34710285044479716,"score_spread":0.2939600178530903,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4244735823","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0092618605,0.03544426,0.0028436375,0.3135217,0.0034770889,0.000041685373,0.00024842843,0.000066597975,0.6350947],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.43298325,0.020632,0.0042133937,0.065489605,0.001866995,0.0001694843,0.00015577379,0.00027252286,0.4742169],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99343854,0.0017106286,0.00020970026,0.0006178926,0.0023379691,0.001685254],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99460995,0.0029150886,0.00027456452,0.0004349305,0.0011209055,0.0006444509],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003815402,0.00073794945,0.0009664595,0.0020085082,0.015619891,0.019381378,0.0030635085,0.015008367,0.01317045],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01117664,0.0008547699,0.0007715903,0.0023819313,0.036657255,0.011088384,0.0058472077,0.018352011,0.0019472982],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010522465,0.000007760718,0.00013722031,0.00003459079,0.000006278022,0.000043773958,0.003313053,0.0001433464,0.00003438821,0.9328584,0.057795465,0.0056151347],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018524526,0.000009203617,0.0010537106,0.0007381377,0.000031793035,0.00005877658,0.0065827435,0.0002450954,0.00018726835,0.42935997,0.5616268,0.000087876775],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7837875,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.92620784,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7837875,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.052090354,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.078138046,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.43497163},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4245762063","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780190682910.003.0001","title":"Introduction","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law and economics; Corporate governance; Political science; Subject (documents); Horizontal and vertical; Focus (optics); Law; Sociology; Computer science; Economics; Mathematics; Management; Geometry","score_opus":0.020101474425283428,"score_gpt":0.23727013917897613,"score_spread":0.2171686647536927,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4245762063","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0006711934,0.007858081,0.002625908,0.007979941,0.0047617787,0.00007323111,0.001176686,0.00039381016,0.97445923],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0053511537,0.0060794624,0.0015507085,0.003109351,0.0013839041,0.00006782566,0.001223974,0.00027412633,0.9809595],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99906,0.00012880968,0.000041598818,0.00023569269,0.00042979457,0.00010415898],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99921644,0.00017950233,0.00004310842,0.000116848845,0.00031547144,0.00012864522],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00061817287,0.00078322756,0.00060685194,0.0013441414,0.0026190234,0.00572376,0.0015698784,0.002666843,0.3908208],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028788107,0.00029195484,0.000490447,0.0017030305,0.0015297921,0.004981766,0.0031640127,0.0028242802,0.21645428],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019383857,0.000028810115,0.00020063574,0.0001955267,0.000003019578,0.00011636659,0.00097340986,0.00011659232,0.00022919242,0.17135242,0.71175426,0.115010455],"study_design_scores_gemma":[7.5060126e-7,0.0000035764479,0.000066615314,0.00007277951,4.6925672e-7,0.000051977662,0.000099105935,0.000010485232,0.000024326662,0.0048244447,0.9948436,0.0000017772603],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002988599,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004014276,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6091792,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025977388,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0021050682,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8689202},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4246450512","doi":"10.1139/cjce-2020-0659","title":"Note of appreciation","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Engineering","score_opus":0.014410527099977774,"score_gpt":0.22731834611080218,"score_spread":0.2129078190108244,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4246450512","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0013377679,0.006425847,0.0006598343,0.60684365,0.3389134,0.00012404472,0.0006596528,0.00032537352,0.044710428],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.015975157,0.003787497,0.0010848832,0.5155063,0.10322021,0.0002524059,0.00027495908,0.0002761429,0.35962236],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966518,0.00045318357,0.00028605858,0.00055327703,0.0016602143,0.0003953791],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9735972,0.005154915,0.0011862593,0.00097128644,0.015134358,0.0039560273],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026730683,0.0009396891,0.0016285457,0.0010201863,0.0039101834,0.004804394,0.0025951504,0.0090263765,0.041456655],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05578027,0.00053986796,0.0011882455,0.00074116536,0.0016058412,0.0025730846,0.0033902891,0.020880565,0.03008607],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014613987,0.00000539502,0.0001811792,0.00003292867,0.000005594674,0.0003673201,0.00012823257,0.000019180232,0.00013553645,0.0015710403,0.9924746,0.0050643864],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000069131515,0.000009225973,0.0007665144,0.000103166836,0.0000060114303,0.0006565962,0.0003811475,0.00008192899,0.00008259189,0.0010576886,0.9968264,0.000021909022],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018848754,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04876665,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.041456655,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002892473,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006556371,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13868636},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4246582876","doi":"10.1017/s0008413100001195","title":"Note from the Editor","year":2009,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Journal of Linguistics / La revue canadienne de linguistique","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Content (measure theory); Applied linguistics; Computer science; Cognitive linguistics; Linguistics; Sociology; Psychology; Data science; World Wide Web; Philosophy; Mathematics; Cognition","score_opus":0.013109162823863268,"score_gpt":0.26829837782857663,"score_spread":0.25518921500471337,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4246582876","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00014222192,0.0024549419,0.00030319762,0.33689898,0.6527162,0.000027241083,0.0001674568,0.0001076542,0.0071820654],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0034802605,0.003321865,0.0006707972,0.4632955,0.39592463,0.00007376292,0.00016094903,0.00016885612,0.13290338],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976593,0.00037906127,0.00031117068,0.00045932247,0.0010020755,0.00018903936],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9820118,0.0045076394,0.00071939843,0.00060924585,0.01048935,0.0016626377],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028729883,0.0010194392,0.0009033039,0.0009869706,0.0025398158,0.0036737865,0.0018676433,0.008218539,0.051087573],"category_scores_gemma":[0.032105412,0.0004891477,0.0009267715,0.00065319805,0.0010121091,0.00394235,0.0016213553,0.012048215,0.03408612],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000068805875,0.000002742322,0.00003449348,0.00002311621,0.0000017184187,0.00007960166,0.000011304223,0.0000075493845,0.00003634104,0.00025261144,0.99626863,0.0032750934],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000065744143,0.0000067247724,0.00020027078,0.00008260571,0.0000051713027,0.00028218125,0.00005942245,0.0000337506,0.00013588087,0.00049765856,0.99867755,0.000012187701],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00407013,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008292022,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.051087573,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001656734,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0036273561,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17090493},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4246782948","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1705620","title":"Review of Guardianship, Custody and Access Under the Domestic Relations Act of Alberta (Part 6 of 6) Summary Proceedings; Appendix A; Selected Bibliography and Amalgamation of Statutes","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legal guardian; Statute; Law; Political science; Library science; Computer science","score_opus":0.011486792671628053,"score_gpt":0.3058262696752231,"score_spread":0.29433947700359503,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4246782948","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0014455221,0.9421954,0.00026041156,0.0086762635,0.003208634,0.000111888665,0.0038532147,0.000038947965,0.040209647],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0147978,0.953701,0.00088931795,0.004391995,0.0010377594,0.00011656261,0.0035375382,0.000023651022,0.021504438],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99620086,0.00044695736,0.00035155736,0.00024092899,0.0023642576,0.00039550712],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99069124,0.002128764,0.00084034563,0.00021246416,0.0058536464,0.00027349504],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005459244,0.000744941,0.00096688606,0.013592964,0.0016990022,0.0030928084,0.0032101537,0.0018913569,0.009450072],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010297249,0.00075555535,0.00074582425,0.024036119,0.0018571359,0.0011390592,0.0011493159,0.0015811311,0.001449366],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007499612,0.000039859777,0.0018522108,0.0119783785,0.00009171592,0.00017646214,0.00097577897,0.0008457543,0.00028857452,0.017253604,0.6244364,0.34198624],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015193252,0.000027866796,0.025527533,0.0114417635,0.00013985652,0.00007316654,0.0006626979,0.000080034,0.00016104571,0.0011097286,0.9607315,0.000029602472],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9102457,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.95452887,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08975428,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03875083,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.118379794,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28115827},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4247294679","doi":"10.1007/978-1-4939-7131-2_100458","title":"Guilt by Association","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Association (psychology); Psychology; Psychotherapist","score_opus":0.018629968408582956,"score_gpt":0.28077102604928944,"score_spread":0.2621410576407065,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4247294679","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0010702407,0.0019234336,0.0013518782,0.012671362,0.0014915015,0.000019508896,0.000035124383,0.000019990097,0.9814169],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.08813421,0.0021040926,0.0008883286,0.016642725,0.002102445,0.00013429226,0.0000892735,0.00007729456,0.8898274],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99679357,0.0011205754,0.00008514146,0.0005880795,0.0008972912,0.0005153073],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99869907,0.00049606984,0.000092102244,0.00020746102,0.00033468736,0.00017051221],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023535173,0.0007346219,0.0006460053,0.00092885905,0.0064753904,0.006655293,0.0013082144,0.0060622753,0.035907246],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0069721234,0.00042128103,0.00049863756,0.00069658906,0.014585512,0.0064119487,0.0044126934,0.009250865,0.012255812],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007470084,0.000011814853,0.00011497368,0.000016431151,0.000005184566,0.0000594208,0.0013179812,0.000058689835,0.000023577539,0.86439127,0.12287555,0.011117519],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000874706,0.0000107705655,0.00028914478,0.00015915095,0.0000060172097,0.00018685636,0.0009211657,0.00012910677,0.00005743499,0.4200696,0.5781518,0.000010256127],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009353261,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016708322,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.035907246,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0042416095,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004024039,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12012166},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4247492084","doi":"10.26443/el.v38i1.7","title":"Note from the Editor","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Education Libraries","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.02327162615347551,"score_gpt":0.32933951579991416,"score_spread":0.30606788964643866,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4247492084","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00021531888,0.0019044477,0.00025004896,0.38630238,0.60342175,0.000056978024,0.0001302532,0.000057612564,0.007661191],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.003807536,0.0018847557,0.0003455344,0.5754906,0.3448086,0.000111480374,0.000071582705,0.000063932865,0.07341585],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99718165,0.00042720037,0.00045667903,0.0005254694,0.0011034325,0.0003056574],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98168683,0.006192666,0.0011275683,0.0008331844,0.008568301,0.0015914475],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003094244,0.00089839887,0.0014871208,0.001222242,0.0026073114,0.0036179551,0.0024110612,0.01672079,0.024616849],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03918419,0.00074252556,0.0012616292,0.0006448366,0.0013947781,0.0024571093,0.0017634319,0.018416833,0.016797306],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017870956,0.0000062103886,0.00009170734,0.00005333451,0.00000839732,0.000387595,0.000027379368,0.000013401434,0.00007766922,0.00060907396,0.9952329,0.0034744206],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002571721,0.000012909468,0.00050696195,0.00020829223,0.000019587362,0.0005618693,0.000109935776,0.00006908639,0.00021687323,0.000792283,0.997451,0.00002539332],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0038184386,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0067853644,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024616849,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001996479,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038199753,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.082351506},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4247751161","doi":"10.7202/1082032ar","title":"Common Law","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law","score_opus":0.04743022982172887,"score_gpt":0.31088208614180773,"score_spread":0.26345185632007884,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4247751161","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0016092005,0.0023165282,0.0056617255,0.011147414,0.0005358733,0.00008651311,0.0003131802,0.000100389116,0.9782292],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.18044974,0.0025180178,0.005023008,0.020466158,0.0015845441,0.00046446547,0.00057300855,0.00022491421,0.7886962],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99445796,0.0016743429,0.0002991335,0.0012563292,0.0016678869,0.0006443422],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9946845,0.0019655507,0.00026080236,0.0011614591,0.0015625459,0.0003651424],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0043866807,0.0006724195,0.0009295413,0.0024162165,0.0068507683,0.009568565,0.0017655258,0.0068409326,0.06674953],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015993621,0.0006240285,0.0009204316,0.002161282,0.008428777,0.0064401524,0.0031591915,0.0067833746,0.014748395],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000045234983,0.000011110525,0.000087124514,0.000013303925,0.0000041823073,0.000018464085,0.0002688578,0.000060314054,0.000040633015,0.9537445,0.041246846,0.0045001796],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012660661,0.000014722439,0.00043406335,0.00012649794,0.000011532622,0.0000760849,0.00030851658,0.00021522988,0.00012681512,0.43772718,0.5609246,0.000022105742],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.033526663,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03756866,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06674953,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0063649127,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009133666,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4248061299","doi":"10.1163/2210-7975_hrd-0126-0020","title":"canadian-lawyer-vol32-issue-11-novdec-2008-62-pp","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"dataset","venue":"Human Rights Documents online","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law","score_opus":0.019587261608767958,"score_gpt":0.3425685679876989,"score_spread":0.32298130637893097,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4248061299","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"dataset","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"dataset","genre_consensus":"dataset","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0001622661,0.00010399003,0.000038116243,0.0003366547,0.00010439723,0.000008128019,0.9955245,0.0003015075,0.0034204805],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0007547838,0.00020123298,0.00019209478,0.00013074327,0.000025080524,0.00004848138,0.9869775,0.00014961555,0.01152044],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99883384,0.00010857582,0.00010851422,0.0001826816,0.00047109128,0.0002954576],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953367,0.0010023732,0.00031929841,0.000943102,0.0016990778,0.0006994674],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001690095,0.0016473698,0.0014038828,0.006016654,0.001571906,0.0060719973,0.0023303241,0.0019647558,0.1888227],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00935714,0.000928135,0.0011213858,0.008974688,0.00079945335,0.0021665483,0.0018422033,0.0026382203,0.205661],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013767232,0.000007936457,0.00043733485,0.00007128359,0.000004351355,0.0000054621282,0.0000072179896,0.000050982042,0.000010230294,0.00025896248,0.99781466,0.0013177139],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008908195,0.0000059632316,0.00481847,0.00027118335,0.00000934136,0.000025880108,0.00009730022,0.00021962164,0.00015175332,0.0007441223,0.99354714,0.00002011309],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2669255,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.45775652,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8111773,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006778263,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009072121,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6316749},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4248247390","doi":"10.1353/cch.2011.0029","title":"Note from the Editor","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Colonialism and Colonial History","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Colonialism; Empire; Elite; Politics; Creole language; History; Kingdom; Classics; Sociology; Media studies; Political science; Law; Ancient history; Archaeology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.025735048849180563,"score_gpt":0.2619494154182394,"score_spread":0.23621436656905884,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4248247390","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00009064832,0.0052751256,0.00015269265,0.28010118,0.7082473,0.000043314558,0.0001070361,0.00009421863,0.0058884793],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0018447475,0.0072095715,0.00042362235,0.40701252,0.48566675,0.00014304298,0.00010564059,0.00016034239,0.09743366],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.995643,0.0005821321,0.00049945107,0.0006107215,0.002296868,0.00036776008],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9691066,0.0051468536,0.0015688254,0.0010041938,0.019759895,0.0034136323],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0048193503,0.0016422692,0.0017368624,0.0017884321,0.0027417946,0.0062601324,0.0032739206,0.011499842,0.036268625],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03875351,0.0007693656,0.0014509002,0.0012565395,0.001469091,0.0050224364,0.0024438517,0.013533842,0.030940924],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000065139416,0.0000028908198,0.000022994856,0.00003806968,0.000002104123,0.000057255842,0.000011010255,0.000005618936,0.000019883013,0.00011577906,0.99625695,0.0034608173],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000073979786,0.000010456958,0.00014870494,0.0001400172,0.000006613897,0.00012515073,0.00006129056,0.000020299683,0.00007150588,0.00023735824,0.999158,0.000013132522],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0040836614,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007188865,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.036268625,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003197794,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007097396,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12133062},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4248492875","doi":"10.1017/9781316676868.004","title":"Note on the text","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Content (measure theory); Computer science; Information retrieval; World Wide Web; Database; Mathematics","score_opus":0.01822239021382028,"score_gpt":0.29809920493283937,"score_spread":0.2798768147190191,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4248492875","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00083702337,0.0020223192,0.0052424115,0.032807756,0.08212076,0.0014499873,0.052216224,0.0046080304,0.8186955],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0020899572,0.001339633,0.0020057943,0.008680905,0.006589171,0.00047207024,0.014013564,0.0015975842,0.9632113],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980862,0.00018929617,0.00016314742,0.00020397763,0.0011777887,0.00017958712],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9884848,0.002812958,0.00047191436,0.00086509506,0.006709149,0.0006560632],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016904708,0.0009224355,0.0009549714,0.0030022212,0.002394347,0.0030483569,0.0015332003,0.0021019813,0.72034365],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0215593,0.00049177953,0.0010393353,0.0026935223,0.0006881419,0.0022601183,0.00188101,0.0028486946,0.6101273],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000130388535,0.000007627875,0.000033366985,0.000070744565,0.000001054309,0.000017562668,0.000017033837,0.000016170976,0.0001339285,0.0013861554,0.9913741,0.006929293],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006678126,0.000010187705,0.00041284217,0.00008774125,0.0000024356002,0.00003201159,0.000044214015,0.000022108261,0.00018592457,0.0008667027,0.99832064,0.000008412969],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014092881,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015587929,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.72034365,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001992357,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032624449,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3988958},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4248816294","doi":"10.1163/2210-7975_hrd-0126-0019","title":"canadian-lawyer-vol32-issue-10-oct-2008-54-pp","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"dataset","venue":"Human Rights Documents online","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.020057939572797546,"score_gpt":0.3441452823363915,"score_spread":0.32408734276359397,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4248816294","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"dataset","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"dataset","genre_consensus":"dataset","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0001979762,0.00013750591,0.00004305202,0.00044701574,0.00013594785,0.000008781249,0.99444336,0.0003275945,0.004258788],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.000919163,0.0002497941,0.00020275684,0.00016464735,0.000033530214,0.00004862258,0.9827467,0.00017197644,0.015462674],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986802,0.0001131916,0.000114025206,0.00020224089,0.0005564997,0.00033382862],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9944999,0.0011763255,0.00034738955,0.0010624267,0.0020609214,0.0008529847],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017799989,0.0016688012,0.0015663644,0.0065280423,0.0017155135,0.0068349093,0.0025074875,0.0020256282,0.2141843],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010107791,0.0009474303,0.0011737468,0.010026337,0.00086268137,0.002354888,0.001862947,0.0028912826,0.21769556],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001463091,0.000008672017,0.0004915612,0.00006384282,0.000004454994,0.000005262458,0.0000068011573,0.000049647915,0.000009681025,0.00026425114,0.99764985,0.0014313341],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008760201,0.000006491452,0.005953799,0.0002668786,0.000010196721,0.00002754948,0.0001060921,0.00024798766,0.00015729388,0.0008053672,0.992309,0.000021830794],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.33172765,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5223102,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7858157,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00798344,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0107956985,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.71651787},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4251398286","doi":"10.4324/9781843145790-19","title":"Canadian Pacific Hotels Ltd v Bank of Montreal [1987] 1S.C.R. 71","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Geography","score_opus":0.019206397705546243,"score_gpt":0.2491591532684103,"score_spread":0.22995275556286404,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4251398286","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0019291105,0.0078118057,0.0003116214,0.013015176,0.0007193832,0.00007469184,0.0012109026,0.00010936468,0.9748179],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.02318554,0.002382421,0.0002491054,0.009443859,0.00012244364,0.00005978067,0.0002572406,0.0000490555,0.9642506],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981224,0.00011291227,0.000028682005,0.000120548175,0.000763004,0.00085244724],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990569,0.00009510808,0.000040605264,0.000029788727,0.00065846817,0.000119181845],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007866035,0.0010439716,0.0004056142,0.0015838403,0.014668348,0.00516704,0.0018059975,0.0053638355,0.054716073],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0027807464,0.00096241746,0.00059157785,0.0025928174,0.0023597023,0.0016719924,0.0013027666,0.004340805,0.009140235],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018316965,0.00001323682,0.0007229999,0.00006591809,0.0000065337626,0.00019298411,0.00067013456,0.00011625823,0.0001028136,0.12136664,0.8656372,0.011086993],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009046682,0.000008468168,0.0038378523,0.00010111075,0.000011322004,0.000062002815,0.00044082737,0.00008423132,0.00013996051,0.002374573,0.99290234,0.00002824691],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97624266,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99381036,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.054716073,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.037340682,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.061892204,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2709269},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4252107597","doi":"10.1017/s0142716420000739","title":"Editors’ Note","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Applied Psycholinguistics","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung","keywords":"Psychology; Content (measure theory); Action (physics); Mathematics; Physics","score_opus":0.03746741469687732,"score_gpt":0.3445947365422463,"score_spread":0.307127321845369,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4252107597","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00018887044,0.001978834,0.00068346213,0.24557836,0.72611356,0.00007587103,0.00090743974,0.00043735903,0.024036217],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.004655949,0.0030219506,0.0021405409,0.35668457,0.3643243,0.00026249923,0.00066929456,0.00068623724,0.26755464],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9945062,0.0005905189,0.000650144,0.0012826266,0.0025675322,0.00040294646],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9534798,0.009621023,0.0016913036,0.0019541446,0.030047394,0.0032061834],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005690783,0.0010406937,0.0012974475,0.0017003873,0.0025379756,0.00498716,0.0030165077,0.006763358,0.12219388],"category_scores_gemma":[0.066548035,0.0006450093,0.001416761,0.0012905175,0.001304844,0.0040776134,0.0020990209,0.012217474,0.09187458],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005017366,0.0000024121573,0.000027692851,0.000019114344,0.0000010589475,0.000032779455,0.00001546494,0.0000067067467,0.00002378719,0.00036248553,0.99649376,0.003009786],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004906621,0.0000038607277,0.000096358264,0.00005896057,0.0000026939938,0.00009994965,0.000042410313,0.000027882574,0.00009051451,0.00043990667,0.99912506,0.000007443614],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0042238147,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010350152,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12219388,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0019979863,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005542046,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4087792},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4252336247","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511609855","title":"The Confluence of Public and Private International Law","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":80,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Private law; Municipal law; Public law; Law; Political science; Comparative law; Conflict of laws; International law; Public international law; Jurisdiction; Commercial law; Subsidiarity; Economics; European union","score_opus":0.025802495847276206,"score_gpt":0.24330271694890804,"score_spread":0.21750022110163184,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4252336247","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008191558,0.008219784,0.023118734,0.02192801,0.0004232964,0.000045421802,0.000039432107,0.00008424298,0.93794954],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.83440965,0.009234258,0.012298589,0.01010945,0.0015711342,0.00031986338,0.00011188113,0.00019763275,0.13174754],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9914112,0.003570629,0.0003251871,0.0011379593,0.002569207,0.0009857778],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99474275,0.003133216,0.00030429804,0.00086540077,0.0005386319,0.00041570642],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006578248,0.0003844377,0.0006667779,0.0021548213,0.0041019954,0.019066794,0.0011018799,0.0038475941,0.008866628],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0076650837,0.00055624417,0.0004813312,0.002433406,0.035576433,0.019774223,0.008710046,0.008413773,0.0011916754],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[9.98331e-7,0.0000024307187,0.000031188214,0.000008856434,7.4429124e-7,0.000013526634,0.0010352168,0.000023289267,0.000017387236,0.99427044,0.001349361,0.0032465516],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000041501107,0.000009226374,0.00024449138,0.00013285429,0.0000047332383,0.00007832895,0.0015607032,0.00024007182,0.000085714695,0.82584155,0.17179134,0.000006645115],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0040124157,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0041914308,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019066794,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008192977,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0067138793,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.059444427},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4252510352","doi":"10.1017/s0069005800009814","title":"<i>Index of Cases / Index de la jurisprudence</i>","year":2009,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Yearbook of international Law/Annuaire canadien de droit international","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Index (typography); Jurisprudence; Content (measure theory); Information retrieval; Computer science; Political science; World Wide Web; Law; Mathematics","score_opus":0.007362477811250207,"score_gpt":0.26752533271683065,"score_spread":0.26016285490558044,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4252510352","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000991948,0.017082093,0.0026410203,0.006251671,0.003558375,0.00038108186,0.06675957,0.0014026902,0.90093166],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.03423445,0.058631364,0.016801143,0.0038424956,0.007632014,0.00089466333,0.12554961,0.0028486922,0.7495656],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970414,0.00028109984,0.00028558096,0.00018298371,0.0019176473,0.00029124907],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99399686,0.001468992,0.00069948175,0.0005754285,0.00259062,0.0006686638],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016154058,0.00082708074,0.00089414185,0.023380155,0.0021307536,0.006244575,0.0015218627,0.0011324567,0.16252261],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008632425,0.00057355675,0.00046142176,0.027127346,0.001283816,0.003423947,0.0015874947,0.0020422759,0.07784094],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009790294,0.000011602735,0.0001903825,0.00015221378,0.0000032821786,0.000018707184,0.00010470074,0.000037429592,0.00014088809,0.02727971,0.94606936,0.025982013],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002703052,0.0000034318432,0.001960093,0.00016467659,0.0000022128377,0.00006164404,0.00009163902,0.00006803055,0.00012453175,0.0052759987,0.9922367,0.000008399318],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08662817,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08605866,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16252261,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0090103615,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0053207716,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.54369235},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4252742130","doi":"10.1093/ww/9780199540884.013.u228540","title":"Macdougall, Gordon Walters, (died 1947), KC; late Professor of Private International Law, McGill University","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"reference-entry","venue":"Who Was Who","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Art history; Art; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.030152947925898167,"score_gpt":0.3014830357229402,"score_spread":0.27133008779704204,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4252742130","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0033351548,0.20958824,0.0019089655,0.35017624,0.098156966,0.00010638524,0.0021039615,0.00028673685,0.33433732],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.016527459,0.02849785,0.000616147,0.017437547,0.0052618985,0.00003516976,0.00021408891,0.00011639468,0.93129355],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996264,0.00006240009,0.000029570374,0.000095792115,0.00012424578,0.000061578605],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991617,0.0001926162,0.00005250444,0.000040665876,0.00041681228,0.00013576199],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00078794966,0.00059702573,0.0003816074,0.0016502434,0.004253177,0.0027709603,0.000752684,0.0022901325,0.04382602],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0028234785,0.00043779347,0.0001964093,0.0013041532,0.0017598128,0.0028996898,0.0011254621,0.004002365,0.011063271],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000100063235,0.0000036050913,0.000116043346,0.00003964869,0.0000016077854,0.00005604398,0.0003304415,0.000019963361,0.000035175362,0.016656974,0.96375054,0.018980023],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000016013536,0.0000019553022,0.00017332555,0.00004728372,0.0000013352583,0.00005928202,0.00015281723,0.000008051232,0.000054047618,0.0021140538,0.9973832,0.0000031101156],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.068576135,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.15893444,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.95617396,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0048278063,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00309666,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14661264},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4252847594","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3757118","title":"Global Legal Institutions","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Political science","score_opus":0.026613358026094915,"score_gpt":0.31833027415627396,"score_spread":0.291716916130179,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4252847594","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0023452921,0.0014425134,0.0006912179,0.008492251,0.00032415302,0.0000200974,0.00022536576,0.000082847204,0.98637635],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.23382299,0.004720827,0.002195891,0.010815638,0.0010077534,0.00017462473,0.00081397814,0.00025136178,0.7461969],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983644,0.00044568715,0.000054217104,0.0002567879,0.00048537948,0.0003934766],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979017,0.0005791632,0.00021315664,0.00050902076,0.0004698948,0.00032706078],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020340143,0.00041346825,0.0003834241,0.0024982078,0.0034426765,0.009285381,0.00070918567,0.0033572786,0.1365357],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005963242,0.00027190254,0.00034366807,0.0034005046,0.0045921304,0.005532884,0.0037529794,0.003274403,0.02209117],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000064172477,0.000014222713,0.00054457656,0.000033952067,0.000004147232,0.000049325492,0.0010452813,0.0000658092,0.0000878581,0.8998056,0.076965876,0.021376861],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000056600943,0.000007739296,0.0011260894,0.00015683901,0.0000055437886,0.000064169304,0.0009357238,0.00006548931,0.000103901104,0.112608366,0.8849144,0.0000061374217],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005406074,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009855057,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1365357,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033700957,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005582148,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.45675743},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4253029584","doi":"10.1016/s0969-4765(04)00087-6","title":"Canadian airports issue biometric ID cards","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biometric Technology Today","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Biometrics; Smart card; Computer security; Identification (biology); Airport security; Business; Engineering; Internet privacy; Telecommunications; Computer science","score_opus":0.010827390170647566,"score_gpt":0.2818114486733163,"score_spread":0.27098405850266877,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4253029584","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020999819,0.0016120217,0.004630156,0.011662239,0.004852709,0.0008381839,0.021675663,0.0031941023,0.9305352],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.11788233,0.0018526372,0.008359115,0.004636781,0.0006128378,0.00022244167,0.017434873,0.00044263064,0.8485564],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9928417,0.00023391766,0.00019178666,0.00032780916,0.005069667,0.0013351196],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98813814,0.00066974194,0.00033325588,0.00061775267,0.009120707,0.0011204472],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002364129,0.00075687806,0.0004639352,0.003664769,0.00822904,0.006227197,0.0014841959,0.002797186,0.07588539],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008544957,0.00055140676,0.00060382875,0.003958091,0.0008242045,0.0013262207,0.0020220494,0.0020027966,0.02485868],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000669001,0.00003899919,0.0050612534,0.000086768494,0.00001153663,0.00027225734,0.00044274327,0.00016190915,0.0014613224,0.0152095,0.92356235,0.053624548],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001268911,0.0000118561,0.00720013,0.000036477657,0.000010089961,0.00006177974,0.00044273277,0.00026483161,0.0007905567,0.0004049484,0.9907302,0.000033603832],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.89101255,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9094109,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10898745,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.023045298,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.029252805,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2538619},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4253581861","doi":"10.3917/riges.352.0079","title":"Introduction","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Gestion","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Environmental science","score_opus":0.010748148604501158,"score_gpt":0.2786141182437563,"score_spread":0.26786596963925513,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4253581861","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09600223,0.009709886,0.013937358,0.013169011,0.0022203068,0.0007175332,0.017834537,0.00083976093,0.8455694],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5741549,0.010369276,0.013859299,0.0073784273,0.0013911838,0.0011887447,0.014212528,0.0004153297,0.3770304],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965862,0.000620248,0.00022802074,0.0007735538,0.0012888795,0.0005030683],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9949704,0.0010751818,0.0010260425,0.0005312609,0.0017169678,0.0006801369],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002205238,0.00053241197,0.0005605331,0.00152866,0.0013022232,0.0037173124,0.0015970819,0.0018843611,0.14421636],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009767647,0.00019744747,0.00068639644,0.0015850993,0.0013121057,0.0017782459,0.0019292873,0.0011823282,0.022731714],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00067491655,0.00041184606,0.087629415,0.002618094,0.00013160806,0.0023307204,0.0070709907,0.0015301952,0.0046835537,0.15224399,0.24707095,0.49360374],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000034899676,0.00019960525,0.08073012,0.0012581259,0.000057063593,0.002817763,0.0042186775,0.00033684142,0.0013530739,0.022424497,0.88649774,0.000071600276],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010731537,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010406207,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85578364,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020234403,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0032823635,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4824518},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4253926598","doi":"10.4135/9781412952637.n73","title":"Canadian Law and Society Association (Association Canadienne Droit Et Société)","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"reference-entry","venue":"","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Association (psychology); Political science; Library science; Law; Sociology; Philosophy; Computer science; Epistemology","score_opus":0.01484463295430814,"score_gpt":0.2842073199251827,"score_spread":0.26936268697087457,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4253926598","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0016422312,0.010772086,0.00043247084,0.024679122,0.0057665063,0.00022718111,0.01193932,0.00034170435,0.9441994],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0075073037,0.0042549847,0.0006184866,0.0016687011,0.0003340994,0.00007645646,0.0021535202,0.00008802905,0.9832985],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99531037,0.00019656669,0.00020414591,0.00030704058,0.0028434647,0.0011383663],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9891584,0.000722992,0.00020162704,0.00039925493,0.007978902,0.0015388788],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029279275,0.0011396316,0.0011841011,0.005688722,0.015151504,0.0106836185,0.0024729194,0.007044994,0.19089408],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0084927725,0.0009832676,0.0008644134,0.008289258,0.0027164228,0.0030079698,0.00230393,0.0048020873,0.02963444],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000062702397,0.000020592408,0.00031787428,0.000046679528,0.0000028418376,0.00002409249,0.00013972943,0.000046251294,0.000019906553,0.026290866,0.9599839,0.013100909],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000049808,0.0000026143648,0.0021318595,0.00009108349,0.00000426904,0.000013752902,0.00022900791,0.000058650203,0.000031805805,0.0016680729,0.995749,0.000014858681],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98063856,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9916026,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.98063856,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.055641584,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.23152195,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6386043},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4254404409","doi":"10.1139/gen-2020-0185","title":"Note of appreciation","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Genome","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Biology; Evolutionary biology; Genetics","score_opus":0.02979618219306887,"score_gpt":0.29122000360686073,"score_spread":0.26142382141379183,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4254404409","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00096743036,0.004117276,0.0007278261,0.6943023,0.25237808,0.00007987232,0.0003996043,0.00023382028,0.046793748],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.013156507,0.0022284435,0.0010958929,0.57052135,0.06333692,0.0001659562,0.00016766474,0.00023235868,0.34909493],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99655616,0.0005531385,0.00023556995,0.0006333963,0.0015661834,0.00045547815],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9784348,0.005187371,0.00092939363,0.0010728276,0.010291743,0.0040838644],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002706883,0.0008105897,0.0014620153,0.0007874408,0.003821941,0.0060915975,0.0024111806,0.011583803,0.042762212],"category_scores_gemma":[0.050957087,0.0005009245,0.0010364362,0.00057437574,0.0018490066,0.002887874,0.003965548,0.026514594,0.027979366],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015237808,0.000005248768,0.00014245693,0.00002576313,0.000004458303,0.00027982486,0.00017111535,0.000017228425,0.00014461493,0.0028369136,0.9917311,0.0046260334],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000060833254,0.0000067212322,0.00040229078,0.00008132789,0.0000037150962,0.00040683497,0.00041720405,0.000068836904,0.000065386885,0.0013832375,0.9971424,0.000015966618],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013241326,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.035382558,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.042762212,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025653874,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006652431,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14305389},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4254986221","doi":"10.4095/301344","title":"Families with Children Living at Home, 1996 - Common-law couples with no children living at home","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"report","venue":"","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Gerontology; Developmental psychology; Medicine","score_opus":0.01340842490495662,"score_gpt":0.2640564991664639,"score_spread":0.25064807426150726,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4254986221","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93933475,0.0026501366,0.00014043615,0.0009848663,0.00005942858,0.00026493694,0.016279597,0.000024440804,0.040261354],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9157616,0.0078009786,0.00044940063,0.0008464996,0.000059282454,0.00051095535,0.023173355,0.000015275707,0.05138279],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994373,0.00006185144,0.00005567949,0.00006877191,0.0001803214,0.00019623569],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991295,0.00006538679,0.00023307053,0.000062900814,0.00024415427,0.00026497137],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00060615456,0.00031493718,0.00020415973,0.0016390738,0.003346305,0.0006977973,0.00070793985,0.00036666574,0.008477188],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015170614,0.00027254826,0.00018494904,0.0025079683,0.00056640204,0.000599283,0.001575713,0.0005514633,0.0008339909],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00015956286,0.00027824673,0.9095583,0.00019567752,0.00004089531,0.0037346438,0.012045505,0.00016810546,0.0007063799,0.0015318283,0.02516539,0.046415374],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000030078714,0.00006693555,0.9475532,0.00015070068,0.000020361984,0.002302744,0.011548563,0.000051627096,0.0002815108,0.00014173203,0.03783111,0.000021367523],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6580852,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.82595354,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.6580852,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0043366584,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005084681,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.68785673},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4255626685","doi":"10.5040/9781474200790.ch-008","title":"Prince Albert v Strange (1849)","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Hart Publishing eBooks","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":21,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"History","score_opus":0.03566224685223425,"score_gpt":0.2669125854209219,"score_spread":0.23125033856868765,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4255626685","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0017944261,0.05713957,0.00069671776,0.033726305,0.01769216,0.00007550494,0.00040886234,0.000051281088,0.8884153],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.018734228,0.009597725,0.0002895418,0.020335702,0.0022059202,0.00006606956,0.00010970823,0.0000460066,0.94861495],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993393,0.00017130942,0.000038884828,0.00009472079,0.00020891972,0.00014693437],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99971837,0.0001072361,0.000023445346,0.00001829982,0.00009558464,0.00003704917],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009067545,0.00052786194,0.000398069,0.001115595,0.004027695,0.002759498,0.0006532569,0.0045763287,0.035359494],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0027014664,0.00043900244,0.00030599005,0.0010133325,0.0023221183,0.0025273785,0.0019642622,0.005033787,0.011116351],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001836327,0.000015043971,0.00016076911,0.00005930846,0.0000029363669,0.00020252944,0.00091253745,0.00004754601,0.00003382338,0.14980377,0.8167361,0.03200729],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002753749,0.000004478224,0.00014799536,0.00009193948,0.0000013667741,0.00011569898,0.00012592023,0.000007141742,0.000025387906,0.009302585,0.9901708,0.00000392965],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.027507067,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08853423,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.035359494,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028454834,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0044969856,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11828929},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4255841119","doi":"10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195312898.001.0001","title":"The Law Market","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Business; Earnings; Asset (computer security); Control (management); Economics; Political science; Finance","score_opus":0.01771173041880927,"score_gpt":0.23328583747617118,"score_spread":0.2155741070573619,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4255841119","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002488823,0.0022920165,0.0014978308,0.028023465,0.00085901946,0.000040561285,0.0002396696,0.00008767983,0.964471],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.12743893,0.0043630865,0.0013587339,0.022143321,0.0019091842,0.00014338928,0.00059928,0.00019289946,0.84185123],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99723166,0.00044430478,0.00009336309,0.0006426853,0.0009664978,0.0006215584],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979329,0.0004906332,0.00016025723,0.00033749166,0.0005244414,0.0005543116],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020956015,0.00045358052,0.0004554218,0.0012774835,0.0055733807,0.015536901,0.0014976606,0.0071852724,0.15990481],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0064115287,0.00031109477,0.00048097732,0.0014811631,0.0063571846,0.011390024,0.0050645857,0.0065526236,0.027807985],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000076203237,0.000025084542,0.00023644223,0.000014486951,0.000002045868,0.00007221404,0.0002827105,0.00007235494,0.00007116284,0.8919984,0.08929371,0.017923754],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000074564246,0.000014241705,0.00045800846,0.00007043331,0.0000019411257,0.00008021727,0.00040981194,0.00024231008,0.00006470342,0.09296852,0.9056747,0.000007672595],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01081601,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008869594,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15990481,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0061728167,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0086165825,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5349349},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4256143135","doi":"10.22215/etd/2007-07532","title":"Justifying &amp; mitigating the semantic indeterminacy in charter jurisprudence: an exploration of legal validity, moral considerations &amp; hermeneutics","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University; Canadian Heritage","funders":"","keywords":"Indeterminacy (philosophy); Charter; Hermeneutics; Jurisprudence; Philosophy; Epistemology; Sociology; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.20039903408272283,"score_gpt":0.4394917003188688,"score_spread":0.23909266623614597,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4256143135","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.104250886,0.004384178,0.45048556,0.15582217,0.00078817504,0.00040191633,0.00015416941,0.00019602264,0.28351694],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9400571,0.0006439273,0.05246303,0.0025313792,0.00031336962,0.00020250365,0.000048207214,0.00011413612,0.0036265398],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.8923724,0.07775332,0.003960116,0.0062136534,0.016815348,0.0028851577],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.71918833,0.23715515,0.012502893,0.016618099,0.013267678,0.0012677821],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.092367835,0.0007504852,0.0013699926,0.0040190755,0.008413018,0.01880561,0.0043497276,0.009246728,0.0053411885],"category_scores_gemma":[0.22701968,0.001162499,0.0012318785,0.0031524745,0.07359228,0.0331219,0.011560035,0.012668385,0.0004252791],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008684105,0.0000060919874,0.00014126019,0.000022006298,0.000004007304,0.00002283719,0.0021474813,0.00025451506,0.000036722748,0.9944482,0.00039477946,0.0025133898],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020217885,0.0000069797616,0.00019453838,0.00011576241,0.000014852207,0.000025771327,0.0014807184,0.0023169743,0.00023401425,0.98889834,0.0066789375,0.00001295609],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007856435,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010544587,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.092367835,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012407542,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018888686,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.48849362},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4281905339","doi":"10.52975/llt.2022v89.002","title":"Editors’ Note / Note de la rédaction","year":2022,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Labour / Le Travail","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan; Mount Royal University","funders":"","keywords":"Redaction; Philosophy; Theology","score_opus":0.011660390845767135,"score_gpt":0.2850344602586965,"score_spread":0.27337406941292935,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4281905339","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000119277734,0.0021257969,0.00019031702,0.3354447,0.65974414,0.000033758344,0.00018060918,0.00006304988,0.0020983396],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0024088984,0.002475063,0.0009942247,0.4897159,0.47293416,0.0001688966,0.00010842959,0.00008877635,0.031105626],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9838509,0.0022459687,0.0030127615,0.0025786355,0.0064860224,0.0018256077],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.89503825,0.037518244,0.007158048,0.004911741,0.048745535,0.006628189],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014116679,0.0017553145,0.0037845462,0.0023518137,0.005191033,0.0115378965,0.0070978533,0.046341326,0.022105882],"category_scores_gemma":[0.14066888,0.0015245164,0.0038638976,0.002048977,0.0041989167,0.0053033866,0.0042196997,0.044271346,0.022830103],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015864467,0.00000788998,0.00007585314,0.00008735215,0.000012190267,0.00018091727,0.000059864964,0.000014355771,0.00005874487,0.00055455026,0.99648345,0.0024488205],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027122696,0.000011566645,0.00034258407,0.00032565728,0.00003027753,0.00037952024,0.00019416309,0.00012292339,0.00016890687,0.0008563201,0.99750453,0.00003639612],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012539127,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021486852,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.046341326,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006175939,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013224248,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07465702},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4286386909","doi":"","title":"The Elgar Companion to the Hague Conference on Private International Law","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Conflict of laws; Law; Political science; Law and economics; History; Sociology","score_opus":0.02297782393661018,"score_gpt":0.27295236065461453,"score_spread":0.24997453671800435,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4286386909","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0033863634,0.110003814,0.003979243,0.056780186,0.055788934,0.00008447755,0.0005797782,0.00022677347,0.76917034],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.036937416,0.026065385,0.0016668661,0.0112218615,0.009564954,0.00013047445,0.00047068563,0.0003153654,0.913627],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975006,0.00072144315,0.000118601354,0.00031255194,0.0009800292,0.00036681278],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99798226,0.0010314364,0.000111060835,0.00025067167,0.00044616283,0.00017834477],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023831653,0.0008978764,0.0006803481,0.0029923795,0.0036815442,0.009561855,0.0014542125,0.0054973317,0.033097513],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0056657805,0.00045502107,0.0005631249,0.003610393,0.0046947612,0.0050496217,0.0031184724,0.005111158,0.009645374],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020847501,0.00003207055,0.00011942071,0.00012169481,0.0000053871886,0.00010898232,0.0005624747,0.00023286065,0.00013008507,0.09881192,0.865017,0.034837242],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000021610338,0.0000040749414,0.00017660113,0.00018916384,0.0000013936352,0.000035666464,0.00027240606,0.00004638516,0.00005901175,0.0071327724,0.99207413,0.0000062377676],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018740024,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.031258196,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.033097513,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0089036,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006236943,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.110722184},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4292002106","doi":"","title":"Les juristes face au dogme de la wertfreiheit, in La neutralité et le droit, Rencontres juridiques Montpellier-Sherbrooke, 25-26 octobre 2012, Les Editions Revue de Droit de l’Université de Sherbrooke, 2013, pp. 7 à 18.","year":2013,"lang":"fr","type":"preprint","venue":"HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Art","score_opus":0.015774421033436823,"score_gpt":0.2480858019564281,"score_spread":0.23231138092299128,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4292002106","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0323698,0.14954488,0.006435109,0.52874994,0.005792905,0.000030702307,0.00020418996,0.000087944005,0.2767845],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7569495,0.03375221,0.0033097693,0.032588035,0.0043571102,0.00010522438,0.00014539811,0.00027463443,0.16851813],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9913368,0.0035730638,0.00038055095,0.0008785969,0.0024182461,0.0014127381],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99391717,0.00411941,0.00041682823,0.00038104982,0.00079516124,0.00037038044],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00842882,0.0006388461,0.0006593023,0.0015759479,0.012462029,0.016714748,0.0016280822,0.010353224,0.0065493435],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019894531,0.00048494985,0.00039053944,0.0024021184,0.02687105,0.009658332,0.004792146,0.012080923,0.0010237937],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000146875445,0.0000056674858,0.0002035873,0.0000427393,0.0000044610015,0.00012412813,0.012263872,0.000056091307,0.00009030083,0.93011236,0.047349572,0.009732515],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021861295,0.000011634654,0.0015931306,0.0004009994,0.000010050399,0.00028721034,0.013465497,0.00013003041,0.00054703717,0.18125674,0.8022395,0.000036250705],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.054779097,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10275995,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.054779097,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016543258,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011794,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.120030284},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4292012736","doi":"","title":"Due process--right to medical access--Supreme Court of Canada holds that ban on private health insurance violates Quebec charter of human rights and freedoms--Chaoulli v. Quebec (Attorney General), 2005 S.C.C. 35, 29272, [2005] S.C.J. No. 33 QUICKLAW (June 9, 2005).","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PubMed","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Political science; Charter; Human rights; Health insurance; Health care","score_opus":0.017744551504262348,"score_gpt":0.2785862839930347,"score_spread":0.26084173248877235,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4292012736","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0136785265,0.0038730402,0.0073014405,0.19795322,0.0016723111,0.0005332703,0.004826208,0.00024328628,0.7699186],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4604786,0.0030332587,0.007819016,0.14524008,0.0007428381,0.00068217644,0.0012294877,0.0001739499,0.3806005],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9848306,0.001668177,0.00052613503,0.0015941615,0.0068457173,0.004535055],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9868739,0.004433309,0.00042583677,0.00090983807,0.0060043074,0.0013527232],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009832804,0.00083027605,0.0013634897,0.0012267411,0.019679315,0.009230588,0.0030102662,0.0147307515,0.023205321],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028322339,0.0009335157,0.001656593,0.0015911631,0.0073929057,0.0033816034,0.0027592226,0.011971827,0.0037641064],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000051726623,0.000052866595,0.0020779555,0.000060229824,0.000029506267,0.00035026178,0.0014674303,0.00024066966,0.0005552972,0.8202615,0.16703436,0.007818197],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00025449813,0.000087207845,0.01146852,0.0006996984,0.00015893026,0.0005827854,0.0014294103,0.0025525738,0.0021190236,0.1258358,0.8545736,0.00023788869],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.90580493,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.94724387,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09419507,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.031305917,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.10970247,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22714138},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4294307015","doi":"10.1093/he/9780198860907.003.0009","title":"9. Exemption clauses","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Notice; Legislature; Law; Legislative intent; Political science; Freedom of contract; Law and economics; Interpretation (philosophy); Exclusion clause; Common law; Economics; Business; Contract management","score_opus":0.03947923908794791,"score_gpt":0.24768638792239284,"score_spread":0.2082071488344449,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4294307015","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0015671793,0.002881169,0.0093549015,0.0027871262,0.0009958895,0.0001136337,0.00029146433,0.000107919484,0.98190075],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.09982602,0.006503894,0.024360772,0.016150657,0.0025455845,0.00082003576,0.0014176056,0.0005661266,0.84780926],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9920557,0.0012989087,0.00054634653,0.00089886633,0.004316285,0.0008837432],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966338,0.0014348213,0.00024875038,0.0005950312,0.0009709977,0.00011654717],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037893343,0.00080155185,0.00070989603,0.0016339716,0.004309995,0.00826429,0.0025421218,0.0054835714,0.0391398],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007784377,0.0007873601,0.0012128663,0.0015712805,0.005092273,0.0067253043,0.0035979012,0.009489073,0.0242268],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004806853,0.00001028193,0.000041545787,0.000042347594,0.000001155792,0.000034648245,0.00041388022,0.000051184423,0.00013660992,0.9764534,0.014392862,0.008417168],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000066206144,0.000012486162,0.00015245214,0.00025370056,0.00000364184,0.00014909494,0.00017808814,0.000098074146,0.00042960866,0.116600364,0.8820999,0.000015916341],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008056769,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0068840906,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0391398,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032592986,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0041768993,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13093573},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4295714057","doi":"10.54648/erpl2007036","title":"Towards a European <i>Ius</i> Commune – What Lessons can We Learn from Quebec’s Mixed Legal System?","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Review of Private Law/Revue européenne de droit privé/Europäische Zeitschrift für Privatrecht","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Context (archaeology); European union; Member states; Common law; Law; Jurisdiction; Derecho; Geography; Philosophy; Business","score_opus":0.024968081916264998,"score_gpt":0.2920405933714443,"score_spread":0.2670725114551793,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4295714057","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.31559584,0.018363269,0.010284968,0.22902927,0.001128224,0.00013245108,0.0012691999,0.00021884484,0.42397794],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9264759,0.0019425155,0.004646593,0.008841278,0.000081686834,0.000050357827,0.00028850758,0.000035712757,0.057637475],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9976649,0.0005953992,0.00005820142,0.000309315,0.00072484714,0.0006473896],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99545276,0.00080557144,0.00032010156,0.00032125268,0.0021941413,0.0009062208],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004449862,0.0002778407,0.00029583607,0.0013347231,0.008566366,0.009138922,0.0016149223,0.0025011625,0.011887412],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005327855,0.00018616415,0.00041022687,0.0018360548,0.0055696294,0.0033683393,0.0025741311,0.0029056615,0.00044235],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010038064,0.00008003996,0.022270607,0.00016268947,0.000066349065,0.00079228386,0.011347406,0.0016285611,0.00066994975,0.83319104,0.0554768,0.07421382],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000069706286,0.00009791389,0.08707877,0.001214365,0.00008415034,0.00045494194,0.02244325,0.006239675,0.0008532228,0.04872704,0.8325894,0.00014748702],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96822506,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97628754,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06608699,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06608699,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06935063,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47949696},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4296022918","doi":"10.5937/zrpfns55-34676","title":"Child's habitual residence in the jurisprudence of the Court of Justice of the European Union","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Zbornik radova Pravnog fakulteta Novi Sad","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Jurisdiction; Residence; Interpretation (philosophy); Convention; Economic Justice; Political science; European union; Jurisprudence; International law; Enforcement; Sociology; Business","score_opus":0.021693685417922336,"score_gpt":0.2964419690910474,"score_spread":0.2747482836731251,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4296022918","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18328263,0.04553483,0.017509095,0.10028007,0.004691545,0.00017874634,0.00023928464,0.00013631104,0.64814746],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9489028,0.0032866052,0.0029992182,0.02437012,0.0009035028,0.0001030936,0.000042892236,0.0000718551,0.019320007],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97809064,0.010646664,0.0017940468,0.0028234012,0.0036085239,0.0030366103],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98513144,0.010857143,0.0008990229,0.0007731702,0.0016851455,0.00065419526],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.025130345,0.00041585474,0.0009917595,0.0014655741,0.0099323755,0.015170778,0.0019192577,0.012037396,0.0016249462],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030595,0.0006797713,0.0007037219,0.0019556873,0.024799671,0.0056492724,0.006683215,0.012558761,0.00031304918],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011087742,0.0000073036967,0.00046398345,0.000022246708,0.0000067078568,0.00035945224,0.007577013,0.00013279334,0.000117692485,0.9829077,0.0047214692,0.003672647],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003972584,0.00009647402,0.0041582803,0.0014490443,0.00005436708,0.0008913156,0.013255296,0.00085193705,0.00086831005,0.35562167,0.6224948,0.00021879667],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.032798853,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.027047172,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.032798853,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009275429,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011744087,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13290358},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4296613264","doi":"10.1093/ajcl/avac016","title":"Multicultural Populations and Mixed Legal Systems in the United States: Louisiana and Puerto Rico","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The American Journal of Comparative Law","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Multiculturalism; Political science; Geography; Law","score_opus":0.056486827888494,"score_gpt":0.34960018607404464,"score_spread":0.2931133581855506,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4296613264","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9766923,0.0026172358,0.00007218646,0.008608222,0.00002492783,0.000021048247,0.00014626104,0.0000040222803,0.011813925],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99601066,0.0016862482,0.000085004765,0.0009821405,0.000021952723,0.00001903016,0.00009291898,0.0000028028721,0.0010991658],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999574,0.0001604868,0.000015465697,0.000042348478,0.000055726738,0.00015193991],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99927324,0.00013719787,0.0001867032,0.000027605563,0.00013559456,0.00023977945],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007392509,0.00015098031,0.00015260426,0.0012683909,0.003679243,0.0022811769,0.0007415306,0.0006100612,0.0023539045],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015205077,0.00010960615,0.00012556864,0.0018496185,0.002166261,0.0012946517,0.0028826843,0.0009372851,0.00009753583],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009845996,0.00025451987,0.5784902,0.00017238583,0.000090616166,0.0025644565,0.30953565,0.0001782757,0.00093005964,0.025339415,0.012911797,0.06943431],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012367938,0.000040874125,0.5455847,0.0003875031,0.00004036962,0.0005879588,0.4151161,0.0002689906,0.00019660263,0.0024756812,0.035250194,0.00003855323],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.5220019,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7175593,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5220019,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005560839,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003508208,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96162623},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4297510182","doi":"10.1017/9781009063814.001","title":"Conventions","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.020294389527565845,"score_gpt":0.3256436250552786,"score_spread":0.30534923552771276,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4297510182","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00075886195,0.00086491945,0.014560094,0.0058677737,0.0049600815,0.0013701062,0.04611801,0.0045919474,0.9209081],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.010408172,0.0026898177,0.025344692,0.006722842,0.0017159249,0.0036084852,0.08068753,0.009493937,0.85932857],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98368996,0.0031826945,0.002415498,0.0019794735,0.0076224175,0.0011099202],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9684719,0.0043205055,0.0013872279,0.008086053,0.016400121,0.0013342069],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014026669,0.001491116,0.0011200204,0.010269276,0.005144963,0.010516153,0.005895209,0.003268768,0.4413328],"category_scores_gemma":[0.054830812,0.0009571676,0.0014192119,0.007821264,0.002779525,0.009256981,0.0047493116,0.0050813556,0.3429336],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003239672,0.000018920318,0.00021606889,0.00033872528,0.0000049108035,0.000044575027,0.0011485323,0.00006731803,0.00043085043,0.10916854,0.86140186,0.027127314],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000024495318,0.0000036055233,0.00012992714,0.00012622838,0.0000018667677,0.000026303549,0.00014926796,0.000016059344,0.000085166546,0.0033289734,0.9961216,0.000008529354],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015692258,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015823165,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4413328,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0054170843,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008136961,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.79687095},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4300945641","doi":"10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198747123.001.0001","title":"Comparative Succession Law","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Entitlement (fair division); Cohabitation; Discretion; Property (philosophy); Creditor; Political science; Law; Law and economics; Sociology; Economics; Debt; Finance","score_opus":0.06083438541908747,"score_gpt":0.2946948702974055,"score_spread":0.233860484878318,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4300945641","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0027552433,0.0029874884,0.0021836213,0.0030472206,0.00031433455,0.000014549826,0.00005712389,0.000020742837,0.9886197],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.47389272,0.0046486254,0.002382946,0.0032371508,0.00075306284,0.00011286839,0.0002877729,0.00007927866,0.5146055],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987669,0.0004519403,0.00003994566,0.00020648754,0.0003297249,0.00020503899],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99934727,0.00021503976,0.000041474337,0.000121465724,0.00021008722,0.00006472761],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013200118,0.00029856217,0.00028658917,0.0010881786,0.0038687405,0.0037552014,0.00082143553,0.001258667,0.037773795],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0027840582,0.0001962399,0.00037734734,0.0008053842,0.0056250007,0.003254418,0.0022310026,0.00274975,0.0037120215],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004003953,0.0000047011113,0.00004192309,0.000008180943,5.9377504e-7,0.000015523563,0.00020679733,0.000051720486,0.000017376231,0.99057287,0.0063352017,0.0027410632],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011894525,0.00002033128,0.0004324515,0.00015455537,0.0000038444127,0.00011701115,0.0005707815,0.00033340594,0.00015461845,0.39819893,0.59999716,0.000005057415],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006610832,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0058934623,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.037773795,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0055130897,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020365492,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1263659},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4303491992","doi":"10.1017/9781800106093.002","title":"Note on the Text","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Natural language processing; Information retrieval","score_opus":0.023120843268946777,"score_gpt":0.3076589971216274,"score_spread":0.28453815385268066,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4303491992","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0006707501,0.0052357074,0.0050568124,0.07350598,0.13487029,0.0025106866,0.12370695,0.0051016742,0.6493411],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0026133275,0.0037299304,0.002581182,0.022582216,0.019128226,0.0013410153,0.03287983,0.0016521827,0.9134921],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9968496,0.0003790727,0.00037579105,0.0003724519,0.001745388,0.0002777288],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9789956,0.003983687,0.0009622585,0.0011444475,0.013914882,0.0009991021],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025402277,0.0011032805,0.0009975168,0.004130236,0.0020641075,0.0042232955,0.0016750052,0.0022604698,0.64216185],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03138612,0.00058359123,0.0012651731,0.0032728424,0.00062816136,0.0024311084,0.0018068479,0.0027508147,0.5076828],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009175621,0.0000035422063,0.000020804391,0.00006911168,7.864452e-7,0.000013198361,0.00000703675,0.0000136950075,0.000040842286,0.00069390814,0.99403787,0.0050900094],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000064433907,0.000007935118,0.0002527107,0.00014713827,0.000002261321,0.000022109767,0.000024398778,0.0000147127685,0.00009666687,0.00079557527,0.99862194,0.000008064922],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017994808,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016488284,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.35783815,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030194346,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005845456,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5104127},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4306933946","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198754183.003.0006","title":"Horizontality: Presuppositions and Functions","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Dignity; Presupposition; Jurisprudence; Exposition (narrative); Law; Human rights; Political science; Order (exchange); Sociology; Law and economics; Epistemology; Philosophy; Art","score_opus":0.025989249903199223,"score_gpt":0.2766433838844074,"score_spread":0.25065413398120817,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4306933946","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.015914865,0.0059140483,0.027867017,0.008726887,0.0002182757,0.000030578038,0.00007511117,0.00005663102,0.9411966],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94342875,0.0042423727,0.0053973673,0.0014661046,0.00036269467,0.00011354207,0.00012651262,0.000068725814,0.04479395],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.996682,0.0019181393,0.00008919367,0.00034446965,0.00072727154,0.00023887822],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977163,0.0015913344,0.000089230394,0.00026823435,0.00026875312,0.00006610929],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030168607,0.00038934973,0.00038187814,0.0009875873,0.0026095938,0.0066651357,0.0009584224,0.0017940429,0.0070909876],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0041371672,0.00035518355,0.00029207315,0.001022299,0.032573823,0.007998816,0.0029815305,0.0046388023,0.0009951537],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000012429892,0.0000017572961,0.000015143994,0.000005238298,4.5102053e-7,0.0000080994505,0.000436711,0.000043015632,0.000017796536,0.9982407,0.00032576616,0.0009041564],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003670889,0.0000069322255,0.0001441635,0.00011294811,0.0000026940966,0.000034709657,0.0012526821,0.00032939913,0.00021393983,0.9516395,0.0462537,0.0000056966833],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0030599353,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0017113327,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0070909876,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004585681,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028528734,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03327161},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4312563132","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-14264-2_3","title":"Conflicts of Law","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Progress in IS","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Law; Conflict of laws; Choice of law; Political science; Subject-matter jurisdiction; Personal jurisdiction; Private law; Common law; Tort; International law; Original jurisdiction; Context (archaeology); Substantive law; Comparative law; Liability","score_opus":0.04773683651121564,"score_gpt":0.3368288457886477,"score_spread":0.28909200927743206,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4312563132","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00043177398,0.0034353037,0.0011080997,0.005080421,0.00040638287,0.000022002125,0.000022150403,0.0000130809585,0.98948085],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.13872163,0.0073540853,0.0030629577,0.010909628,0.0012885196,0.00023119459,0.00012400637,0.000101676975,0.83820635],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9967179,0.0017018615,0.00008547261,0.00038399652,0.00075665885,0.00035419708],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985145,0.00082483597,0.000080484395,0.00017644813,0.00027200062,0.00013179258],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030095652,0.0007629108,0.00071963447,0.0014022125,0.006599887,0.012532729,0.0012467193,0.0054849554,0.022841584],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0061280876,0.00036912694,0.0003284333,0.0014124748,0.01885457,0.0074032033,0.0038222843,0.0061916136,0.0052309255],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000012036775,0.0000043208984,0.000016135575,0.0000075604416,7.151999e-7,0.000009345049,0.0007857179,0.000030480323,0.000011485697,0.9750795,0.02089218,0.0031613922],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000026368382,0.000004595698,0.000086498396,0.00012993284,0.0000019748159,0.00004922236,0.0012815892,0.000090541114,0.000041773554,0.5318767,0.46642974,0.000004803182],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01291947,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018784154,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022841584,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0070905006,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007925432,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07641268},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4312926044","doi":"10.1007/978-3-030-78318-1_110","title":"Orr, Alexandra","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Trent University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology","score_opus":0.03422855691000146,"score_gpt":0.2901516064137893,"score_spread":0.2559230495037878,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4312926044","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0003135246,0.019593371,0.00091671763,0.0054995976,0.002439187,0.000014436564,0.00010240958,0.00009444469,0.9710262],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.002543168,0.0046361177,0.00031313155,0.0010425939,0.00027333965,0.000012975031,0.000039970782,0.00007103864,0.9910676],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997178,0.000058689486,0.00000849132,0.000063493455,0.000110827415,0.00004078645],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99980134,0.00006101831,0.000010081881,0.00003179603,0.00007021476,0.000025509824],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00038858788,0.00069637666,0.0005609262,0.0013124658,0.0022135274,0.003716276,0.00084998156,0.001900371,0.10409952],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011205667,0.00044866488,0.00028573553,0.0013356139,0.0011252617,0.0030417454,0.0016616336,0.003086976,0.05655092],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001191816,0.00001502222,0.000057693967,0.000079196776,0.0000023704995,0.0000665803,0.0005279294,0.00014042402,0.0001587378,0.15884958,0.73539025,0.10470029],"study_design_scores_gemma":[8.904623e-7,0.000001510518,0.000054092416,0.00005281292,0.0000010158096,0.00003906634,0.000085027525,0.00003259505,0.00002755713,0.005461221,0.99424237,0.000001830525],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0073584663,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02431251,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8959005,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020125178,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001168128,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3482476},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4312947185","doi":"10.1007/978-3-031-14264-2_5","title":"Comparative Legal Strategies","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Progress in IS","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Sovereignty; Mandate; Political science; Data governance; Legislature; Corporate governance; Variety (cybernetics); Realm; Legislation; Law; Law and economics; Politics; Business; Computer science; Sociology","score_opus":0.05730928409788204,"score_gpt":0.3672815565047576,"score_spread":0.3099722724068755,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4312947185","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0011521636,0.0030732555,0.0025019534,0.004574194,0.00018068159,0.00002057311,0.000054322412,0.000019491514,0.9884234],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4152395,0.008253574,0.011080235,0.006245047,0.00082104304,0.00037511555,0.00046369561,0.00016207094,0.55735976],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972487,0.001558253,0.00005187847,0.0003515712,0.0005081146,0.0002815135],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982666,0.00094907096,0.000066259716,0.00026455172,0.00033800027,0.000115507646],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003766877,0.00056085986,0.0005555416,0.0040451447,0.0049838987,0.008515086,0.0017698556,0.0034127692,0.04102791],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0070851753,0.00025432924,0.0003526033,0.0032592027,0.012334154,0.007826798,0.0027658592,0.0031786843,0.0036050293],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000013378033,0.0000037177442,0.000011729832,0.000005838946,5.0508663e-7,0.0000037597028,0.00022517906,0.000028758586,0.0000057462016,0.99276537,0.0041614273,0.0027867134],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004765507,0.0000063803845,0.00016147144,0.00011465557,0.0000026769087,0.000025663314,0.0014019548,0.00018578002,0.000060352202,0.7387065,0.2593263,0.0000035616717],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011869782,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015308439,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04102791,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008124705,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004215642,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13725203},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4313857695","doi":"10.1139/cjm-2022-0255","title":"Note of appreciation","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Microbiology","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Biology; Chemistry","score_opus":0.01913677623634561,"score_gpt":0.2794322559167629,"score_spread":0.2602954796804173,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4313857695","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0014126932,0.0076686107,0.0010073923,0.58654,0.36443472,0.00011855461,0.00067952013,0.00040000663,0.03773844],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.022072947,0.0049914382,0.0019330672,0.50661176,0.123087324,0.00024133826,0.00031615165,0.00038734786,0.34035867],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9950376,0.00072643143,0.00041182627,0.00075570674,0.002575864,0.0004924983],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95353556,0.008053693,0.0021972042,0.0016477712,0.027826555,0.0067391302],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030223513,0.0010186669,0.0018734944,0.0010602969,0.0027973305,0.0046631703,0.00255697,0.007948308,0.041830014],"category_scores_gemma":[0.070625454,0.0005482482,0.0011782965,0.0006767007,0.0017048417,0.002487411,0.0036530474,0.019835904,0.03245811],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018307099,0.0000064699584,0.00023354065,0.000044363707,0.000008341181,0.0005459619,0.00014222227,0.000024749053,0.00026669676,0.0013281604,0.99084365,0.0065376377],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008090371,0.000013294698,0.0008052515,0.00012056153,0.0000070481874,0.0013560068,0.00039691204,0.00011845775,0.00011611263,0.0010686637,0.9959622,0.000027538246],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013926064,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.033178195,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.041830014,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024385867,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006607382,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13993531},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4318754752","doi":"10.1139/cjpp-2023-0005","title":"Note of appreciation","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Physiology and Pharmacology","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Chemistry; Medicine","score_opus":0.023088256716065556,"score_gpt":0.3335611390993996,"score_spread":0.31047288238333404,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4318754752","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0013776404,0.0076737595,0.0010444307,0.595762,0.35706124,0.00010927818,0.0007020463,0.00041817463,0.035851356],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.022361182,0.004919185,0.001916191,0.5154608,0.11242571,0.0002738509,0.00031547624,0.00047941637,0.34184822],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99538004,0.00076803856,0.00035009347,0.00068871945,0.0023515262,0.00046155238],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9581408,0.0074089095,0.0017286866,0.0015277985,0.024298452,0.006895294],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033302119,0.0009796494,0.0018123344,0.0010060703,0.0031347196,0.0046104672,0.0024087457,0.0063673374,0.04363099],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07099353,0.0004781231,0.0011126922,0.00055940374,0.0017780318,0.0024416812,0.0037984469,0.01959215,0.03144741],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018833865,0.0000059031554,0.00018395903,0.00003829634,0.0000074583813,0.00047254955,0.00017281517,0.000023737932,0.00020252717,0.0016493812,0.99077153,0.0064530573],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008972698,0.000011723237,0.0007083916,0.00013970399,0.000007010793,0.0012748922,0.0005107809,0.00010439733,0.000096210555,0.0014186646,0.99569255,0.000026797597],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014427212,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.036663175,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04363099,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025238094,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0070093824,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14596021},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4319048415","doi":"10.1093/tandt/ttad002","title":"Managing and preventing cross-border disputes arising with the increasingly popular use of succession substitutes","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Trusts & Trustees","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Probate; Choice of law; Popularity; Business; Common law; Ecological succession; Civil law (Civil law); Law; Law and economics; Leasehold estate; Interim; Property (philosophy); Conflict of laws; Commercial law; Economics; Political science","score_opus":0.026056207600680704,"score_gpt":0.3632673720752475,"score_spread":0.3372111644745668,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4319048415","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.4333323,0.007070646,0.17826134,0.056237683,0.00072800246,0.00060809084,0.000028842425,0.00024750005,0.3234857],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9727878,0.001107768,0.015863687,0.0016499794,0.000083022875,0.00007232218,0.000012423639,0.0000152529465,0.008407723],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9795179,0.011758709,0.0013256988,0.00086743553,0.0049728435,0.0015573576],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97405857,0.01246466,0.0069529745,0.002014718,0.002869622,0.0016395061],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01696226,0.00024482032,0.00029798714,0.0019220859,0.0070331558,0.007024157,0.0016930728,0.0029814807,0.0039644237],"category_scores_gemma":[0.032602705,0.00024899025,0.00039681498,0.0015034461,0.007075913,0.0069517475,0.008383568,0.0032876863,0.000418953],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000057307057,0.00046792027,0.034970473,0.00033502438,0.00005914948,0.0026961847,0.028302982,0.0038739196,0.0032138596,0.64311016,0.01680551,0.26610753],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006657908,0.0012264005,0.032553136,0.0025359958,0.00014334143,0.0051981215,0.13480735,0.020001743,0.010594832,0.2531102,0.5395222,0.00024011722],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036100654,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0072236345,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01696226,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032439095,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007023422,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08970606},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4320162514","doi":"10.7202/1095686ar","title":"L’INTERPRÉTATION ÉVOLUTIVE DE LA NOTION D’ÉLÉMENT D’EXTRANÉITÉ À L’ÈRE DU CYBERESPACE ET SES RÉPERCUSSIONS SUR LE DROIT INTERNATIONAL PRIVÉ","year":2021,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue du notariat","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.013977314449726188,"score_gpt":0.27622414842505416,"score_spread":0.262246833975328,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4320162514","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02487021,0.02342998,0.054716982,0.064200036,0.0032390312,0.000039219194,0.0003001575,0.000055793258,0.8291486],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8864653,0.011908035,0.012621074,0.009344767,0.0022200213,0.00016894694,0.00024088485,0.00023069393,0.07680018],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.992922,0.0029287396,0.0002692994,0.0011756873,0.0020460947,0.0006582221],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9957457,0.0021171067,0.00047655508,0.000497144,0.0009811913,0.00018224328],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00504193,0.0006319631,0.0005069881,0.0020682644,0.004747513,0.01080962,0.001480363,0.005620047,0.010189366],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007804973,0.00044546035,0.001168168,0.0021401625,0.03526387,0.016043888,0.005378677,0.01001705,0.0012320282],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000043236173,0.0000016508486,0.000066262146,0.000016131029,0.000002121754,0.000026390766,0.0013050517,0.000040004106,0.0000414081,0.9963231,0.0010513547,0.0011222223],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012067158,0.000015196745,0.0010760758,0.00036696915,0.00001442305,0.00037139014,0.0029678275,0.00038562078,0.0003536132,0.764396,0.23000278,0.000038037164],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0089793205,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008241829,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01080962,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007968709,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0039817407,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05781728},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4322736752","doi":"10.1139/cjas-2022-0140","title":"Note of appreciation","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Animal Science","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology","score_opus":0.030890173611715418,"score_gpt":0.31716488915966873,"score_spread":0.2862747155479533,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4322736752","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0018142235,0.006896712,0.0012974081,0.6068662,0.32036752,0.00015559775,0.0011050008,0.00054727495,0.060950167],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.023548683,0.0038473199,0.0020916567,0.4053178,0.07579114,0.00029544963,0.00043739937,0.0005026292,0.48816797],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9958644,0.00062419905,0.0002987346,0.0006170808,0.0022022824,0.00039331525],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96413213,0.0061101266,0.001432561,0.0013338376,0.021650983,0.005340482],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029420895,0.00085541187,0.0015589189,0.0009931187,0.0030931702,0.0043462473,0.0023996616,0.006008179,0.054400865],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05674753,0.00045091176,0.00096028834,0.0006325808,0.0014337766,0.002392186,0.0035235523,0.016994245,0.035816584],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017968063,0.0000060033913,0.00020042445,0.00003676941,0.0000060228426,0.00033985524,0.00016484216,0.0000215091,0.00025468756,0.0017576275,0.99043274,0.006761465],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000069759926,0.00001022433,0.00080180325,0.00010389745,0.0000058222163,0.0007323968,0.00047346763,0.00010095144,0.00011318744,0.001168829,0.99646014,0.000022283508],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015558599,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.038694553,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.054400865,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002266771,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006121409,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18198901},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4327581087","doi":"10.9785/9783504386436-005","title":"Abkürzungsverzeichnis","year":2023,"lang":"de","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Verlag Dr. Otto Schmidt eBooks","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"York University; Northwestern University","keywords":"Psychology","score_opus":0.045810145309151486,"score_gpt":0.2919508196197687,"score_spread":0.24614067431061723,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4327581087","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0019027068,0.019449785,0.006685413,0.009389749,0.06789576,0.0016660959,0.10927994,0.0036385776,0.780092],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.022891298,0.026057245,0.003973907,0.0054966183,0.011710791,0.0029048836,0.1541252,0.002467723,0.7703724],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9950191,0.0007111782,0.0010155215,0.000899106,0.0018667026,0.0004885144],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9925875,0.0017389461,0.00077328546,0.0010781495,0.0030744437,0.0007476586],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027352804,0.0015970888,0.0015945194,0.0048500565,0.0017642304,0.006470849,0.0025362764,0.0025334829,0.57395905],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017388435,0.0005741759,0.0009864457,0.0065328837,0.0007122956,0.0038707769,0.003795157,0.0028945892,0.4354477],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000120070516,0.000042027015,0.00030624785,0.0009152673,0.000010904341,0.00010220579,0.00009896626,0.00017976515,0.00030869013,0.011875419,0.92812526,0.057915196],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009498911,0.000014802978,0.00039588823,0.000307032,0.0000035991964,0.0000525383,0.000045063793,0.000057581045,0.0000802235,0.001281058,0.9977458,0.0000068557733],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0047523705,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021113488,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.42604095,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018023084,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00423497,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6076957},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4327694445","doi":"10.3917/licla1.108.0005","title":"Introduction","year":2023,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Littératures classiques","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.02081004340441001,"score_gpt":0.31327953128268166,"score_spread":0.29246948787827165,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4327694445","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0015460976,0.004637972,0.004722998,0.0142028425,0.009706214,0.00023292236,0.0038028792,0.0012964725,0.9598516],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.012778013,0.0037893355,0.0034786416,0.006722042,0.0020245013,0.00023999478,0.0038265244,0.0007192127,0.9664218],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99784136,0.0003519348,0.0001230035,0.0005530216,0.0008471981,0.000283551],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977774,0.0003477056,0.00010687664,0.00037025,0.0009374747,0.00046020935],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001548447,0.00097174227,0.0007131766,0.0015900491,0.003121066,0.008312614,0.00232361,0.0041396944,0.53076977],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006062606,0.00040486705,0.00084856007,0.0017823855,0.0016163536,0.00528906,0.004933084,0.0031093173,0.34588575],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000085469495,0.000058628935,0.0006242256,0.00038542625,0.00000950841,0.00030273985,0.000947438,0.0001258456,0.00045924322,0.0619211,0.78059554,0.15448485],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000369374,0.000008459321,0.00021458103,0.00010399692,0.0000018153253,0.00010323928,0.00020561075,0.000024764766,0.00006992505,0.0029333343,0.9963257,0.0000048570523],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004843437,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0055470155,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.46923023,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003028179,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0048650135,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.66929996},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W43601898","doi":"10.21991/c90080","title":"LEGAL IMPLICATIONS OF THE PERSONS CASE","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.043017311832716065,"score_gpt":0.28871949705185274,"score_spread":0.24570218521913667,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W43601898","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.039838634,0.0037295274,0.0060075023,0.3441212,0.0022140192,0.00012929547,0.0001488257,0.000048270762,0.6037628],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87248,0.0025791388,0.0035207847,0.06996602,0.0033606105,0.00029169154,0.00008931326,0.000035631983,0.047676846],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9874473,0.005375248,0.00046683528,0.0014322441,0.002418459,0.002859946],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98549783,0.010734982,0.00087788043,0.0007966366,0.0011063982,0.0009861685],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01250149,0.00042289693,0.0010905551,0.0025195037,0.011402133,0.008037258,0.0034442672,0.022998223,0.014785567],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03150299,0.0007027649,0.001745585,0.0012966057,0.016728153,0.009951051,0.005754959,0.013887098,0.0008637091],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030947635,0.000063284664,0.00030432307,0.000016811358,0.000010894103,0.0014299524,0.0011198572,0.0001917545,0.00008196372,0.9845145,0.0089765005,0.0032592781],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012745913,0.000040736984,0.0011193973,0.0001624883,0.000060286548,0.0013273259,0.0036987315,0.00085218606,0.00039216352,0.8941569,0.09800979,0.000052578045],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019487543,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012911529,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022998223,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0053366683,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0078243725,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06611502},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4361994865","doi":"10.18356/9789210011068c004","title":"No. 53193. Canada and Hong Kong Special Administrative Region (under authorization by the Government of the People's Republic of China)","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"United Nations Treaty Series","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"China; People's Republic; Government (linguistics); Authorization; The Republic; Political science; Public administration; Law","score_opus":0.022614355612494624,"score_gpt":0.24433811997321675,"score_spread":0.22172376436072214,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4361994865","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0004890736,0.0062385723,0.00033475814,0.0014689078,0.00084966485,0.00011305583,0.0052779536,0.00024078749,0.9849873],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0006982342,0.00066273496,0.000073772,0.0002292559,0.000033337852,0.000024392819,0.000560243,0.000050015406,0.99766797],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9997117,0.000016808111,0.000015243859,0.00006124089,0.00013760042,0.00005727457],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995957,0.000044775676,0.00001912058,0.000032720363,0.00025620701,0.000051596533],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00040033486,0.0010956414,0.0005726418,0.0015393434,0.0033584323,0.0031449595,0.0011768668,0.0018606891,0.2600557],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008522576,0.0007101044,0.00024594707,0.003229229,0.0008821973,0.0015258357,0.0007722946,0.0022082857,0.14053215],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017071035,0.000010824572,0.00011009476,0.00011271408,0.0000018224216,0.000031041753,0.0002121252,0.0000724179,0.000092278104,0.022259723,0.94858056,0.028499272],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000022604033,0.0000032004796,0.0005608712,0.000048926864,0.000001164121,0.000015580625,0.000049150927,0.00002458103,0.00003773391,0.00042720337,0.9988262,0.000003075037],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.61863387,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.79567385,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.38136613,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009787064,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009431232,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.86997294},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4366000912","doi":"10.18356/9789210011051c012","title":"No. 53188. Canada and Turkey","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"United Nations Treaty Series","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Property (philosophy); Political science; Geography; Philosophy","score_opus":0.020975249175150795,"score_gpt":0.24713807263277546,"score_spread":0.22616282345762467,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4366000912","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00046277008,0.021867638,0.00013814504,0.0027797613,0.0013519241,0.000036570003,0.0027515155,0.00016157646,0.97045016],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0019490641,0.0025309788,0.000074385556,0.00055774965,0.000084476975,0.00001812345,0.0004657178,0.000054789027,0.99426466],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996799,0.000017063276,0.000013759505,0.00007886607,0.0001414755,0.0000689755],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997391,0.00002814396,0.000015189002,0.000021537975,0.00015293152,0.000043179454],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00020119092,0.0011951699,0.0005230156,0.0023649829,0.004756967,0.0040218383,0.001171981,0.0027926618,0.2645632],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00065084535,0.00048105116,0.00022852149,0.0043462203,0.0011213474,0.0018858631,0.0010809185,0.0021497307,0.110197544],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019973038,0.000008039794,0.00009294063,0.00008813838,0.0000017823687,0.000052790085,0.00016780158,0.00008185728,0.00008772303,0.024485061,0.92216504,0.05274896],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000017928049,0.0000019841211,0.00030615475,0.000049941562,8.923079e-7,0.000023058203,0.00006195225,0.000014412524,0.000026631333,0.0005147189,0.9989957,0.000002754154],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6994229,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.86798686,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3005771,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01164689,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00901368,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8850521},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4366338464","doi":"10.5463/thesis.109","title":"Huwelijkse voorwaarden met gescheiden vermogens. Koude uitsluiting in het licht van de dynamische en affectieve relatie van echtgenoten.","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"L'Alliance Boviteq","funders":"","keywords":"Spouse; Property (philosophy); Covenant; Solidarity; Feeling; Community property; Event (particle physics); Cohabitation; Political science; Law; Psychology; Social psychology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.015037865019044723,"score_gpt":0.32919691876135737,"score_spread":0.3141590537423126,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4366338464","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0754174,0.02169537,0.03663029,0.025069691,0.0020274743,0.00015193867,0.0012917448,0.00024823268,0.8374679],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.57168174,0.014765963,0.015780035,0.0023269886,0.00040990714,0.00020459834,0.0011391002,0.00071225,0.39297935],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962845,0.0013255419,0.00015319287,0.00060867,0.0011612179,0.00046689317],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985668,0.000558216,0.0002249751,0.00021515276,0.00024396933,0.00019079627],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018461741,0.00053959305,0.00051881606,0.00094705715,0.002700299,0.011222078,0.0013262887,0.0019443054,0.053372268],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0062138084,0.0005438479,0.00044462952,0.0013940638,0.0046817316,0.008425195,0.005195696,0.002429722,0.0077829994],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007022602,0.00020824891,0.0038469622,0.00040831952,0.00006202603,0.0009037608,0.02085433,0.0014879374,0.0019193491,0.8198253,0.035324275,0.115089394],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000109317725,0.000023093817,0.0022866118,0.00041548678,0.00002055782,0.00027601974,0.010587907,0.0007532453,0.00074674765,0.09106681,0.89377505,0.000037592148],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.029129347,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04165586,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.053372268,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004869469,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005097871,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17854804},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4366381860","doi":"10.1017/9781839703102.068","title":"Living Without The Jurisdictional Rules of Brussels IIA","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"Family matters","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Honour; Privilege (computing); Aside; Family law; Law; Political science; Sociology; Law and economics; Art","score_opus":0.01740378811191115,"score_gpt":0.28218167395708854,"score_spread":0.26477788584517736,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4366381860","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0056518083,0.0051488085,0.004896053,0.008887951,0.00075561536,0.000051680974,0.00028325067,0.00008014666,0.97424465],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.547878,0.005969584,0.007949106,0.009047866,0.0010213548,0.0004491748,0.00077905145,0.00020404567,0.42670175],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9908832,0.0030504074,0.0004436207,0.0015892441,0.0026888167,0.0013447206],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976502,0.0011609278,0.0002218565,0.00035086414,0.00048482092,0.00013139274],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027959119,0.000504124,0.00051476987,0.0015305344,0.0063608726,0.010592619,0.0019289439,0.005284476,0.027216978],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007214134,0.00050541275,0.00039832905,0.001965461,0.009844566,0.0037880947,0.0038895777,0.007209655,0.0062804585],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005754179,0.000006647369,0.00013095715,0.000029950685,0.00000176816,0.00007449193,0.001272759,0.00017409233,0.00004789069,0.9809764,0.012055794,0.005223423],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000089997075,0.000021469536,0.0009281981,0.00066293264,0.000006218755,0.00020051475,0.0012983312,0.00028061421,0.00025114475,0.29815617,0.6981412,0.00004418525],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06766126,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.052796766,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06766126,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008285476,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006932973,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13453484},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4366958445","doi":"10.5040/9781509954308","title":"The Common Law Jurisprudence of the Conflict of Laws","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Hart Publishing eBooks","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Choice of law; Jurisprudence; Conflict of laws; Jurisdiction; Political science; Common law; Comparative law; Municipal law; Enforcement; Civil law (Civil law); Politics; Public law","score_opus":0.05120477763624903,"score_gpt":0.30774858891451606,"score_spread":0.25654381127826703,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4366958445","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0030512295,0.026211156,0.006688566,0.022617375,0.0011333239,0.00004907849,0.00004811018,0.000033476,0.9401677],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.56979215,0.044297703,0.010225239,0.021116188,0.0037254437,0.0006153033,0.00017043714,0.00021047986,0.3498471],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99599767,0.0020969568,0.000104157596,0.00028459667,0.0011813609,0.00033527592],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99714476,0.0021300795,0.00014175175,0.00023886288,0.0001875162,0.00015687346],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027340609,0.0004756947,0.0005362148,0.0017700444,0.0065895095,0.009685951,0.0011602417,0.0032511314,0.0043981937],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0054221787,0.0004065289,0.00029749094,0.0021877976,0.048038874,0.005989183,0.003936854,0.006013632,0.0010602237],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[7.514846e-7,0.0000015619042,0.000016143911,0.000014981338,5.497434e-7,0.0000277929,0.0015610787,0.000033152555,0.000012471942,0.9889459,0.007309996,0.0020756214],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000038787825,0.000006573975,0.00017682668,0.00023330706,0.0000016891707,0.00012421655,0.00216115,0.00012812673,0.00004104094,0.60308975,0.39402747,0.000006020004],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01013166,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009897559,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01013166,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007933572,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0074552465,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05756235},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4367551791","doi":"10.37232/sp.1987.4.6","title":"Konkubinat w świetle prawa państw kapitalistycznych","year":2023,"lang":"pl","type":"article","venue":"Studia Prawnicze / The Legal Studies","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cohabitation; Family law; Common law; Marriage law; Law; Comparative law; Political science; Legislation; Sociology","score_opus":0.07460446297322261,"score_gpt":0.3837372752043912,"score_spread":0.3091328122311686,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4367551791","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.097695485,0.09876419,0.012863404,0.07673536,0.0027216717,0.00018534574,0.0011741145,0.0004295205,0.7094309],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6404082,0.06977808,0.005733283,0.005013566,0.0010632597,0.0003536371,0.0009990581,0.00041499097,0.2762359],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99753225,0.00071445544,0.00012433562,0.00036749773,0.00067217636,0.00058920775],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99877256,0.00024028476,0.000218272,0.00013675158,0.00035361128,0.0002785136],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015264722,0.00044154326,0.00044625025,0.0033115584,0.004097144,0.0094438335,0.0007369547,0.0013916959,0.03529372],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0036773696,0.00040753113,0.00032535766,0.0050476547,0.004013607,0.0071720826,0.0056630247,0.0035031606,0.0063427463],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008792521,0.0001480022,0.0056174896,0.0006660052,0.000034955927,0.0014020125,0.03531496,0.00029850073,0.00078976864,0.5631837,0.10885273,0.283604],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007660122,0.000027506876,0.0085588405,0.0004929849,0.00001706207,0.0008068711,0.01919927,0.00024650455,0.00030030392,0.039080348,0.9312374,0.000025345958],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011449416,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015847273,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03529372,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00554858,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0062842923,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11806929},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4368347671","doi":"10.3917/rn.231.0098","title":"Ithaque, Encore","year":2023,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"La Revue Nouvelle","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Musée de la Civilisation","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.028424257591278805,"score_gpt":0.29840853446605936,"score_spread":0.26998427687478055,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4368347671","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.028984094,0.035782676,0.018524902,0.22163355,0.02138699,0.00009274338,0.001292169,0.00065984065,0.67164296],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.23912522,0.018443327,0.010134688,0.03813472,0.009296738,0.0001968751,0.0007474407,0.0005128088,0.68340814],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9955024,0.0012628298,0.00027182614,0.0010818102,0.0012941968,0.0005867996],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98941934,0.004621835,0.0009058218,0.0012636485,0.0030923258,0.0006969248],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004475515,0.0005964859,0.0009576839,0.0017109644,0.005043119,0.008970601,0.0022871688,0.0053941375,0.050935265],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016814584,0.0003305234,0.0006923173,0.0015703352,0.006223495,0.0071700453,0.0049135475,0.0066144057,0.011079785],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020951321,0.000114383685,0.008894653,0.0008534707,0.000087284236,0.0020133064,0.016626177,0.0003966799,0.0035786412,0.58197045,0.22553657,0.15971878],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000065558465,0.000034184235,0.0048764194,0.0003100164,0.000014321389,0.00097599375,0.003429377,0.00017588725,0.00075579266,0.019915361,0.9694688,0.00003720475],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.026303953,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03580268,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.050935265,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034278247,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0049908464,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17039543},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4376598791","doi":"10.1017/9781009153515.011","title":"Cambridge Studies in International and Comparative Law: 168","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.13521127943875583,"score_gpt":0.41845939668032206,"score_spread":0.28324811724156623,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4376598791","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0058729253,0.07646136,0.00048392382,0.060550425,0.0008806608,0.000018200326,0.00034191142,0.000031988297,0.85535854],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6624071,0.052010354,0.0010186338,0.011685491,0.004059583,0.00019576652,0.00051847915,0.00013987428,0.2679647],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99846566,0.0009220027,0.000047261063,0.00012898412,0.00028394957,0.00015208744],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979169,0.0013002026,0.000114875715,0.00021178545,0.00024194088,0.00021420918],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018622396,0.0005001656,0.00047554597,0.0028717099,0.0031048332,0.009178807,0.0006822411,0.0037712567,0.047830846],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005091275,0.00021752142,0.00020348984,0.0043357075,0.011487231,0.006971562,0.0020990279,0.0024949575,0.0037966643],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000068035306,0.0000116197325,0.0003296793,0.000088546556,0.000002497495,0.00004285741,0.0034061642,0.000034750377,0.000029282544,0.9236647,0.06557178,0.006811273],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020379272,0.000023097056,0.0046879053,0.0016901729,0.000008912678,0.0001115545,0.008620199,0.00015484412,0.00009693067,0.23516914,0.7494004,0.000016576703],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.029896613,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.032113153,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.047830846,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008592449,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027551923,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16001016},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4376877431","doi":"10.1108/oxan-db279101","title":"Canadian debate over streaming services moves venues","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Emerald expert briefings","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Outrage; Journalism; Business; The Internet; Political science; Net neutrality; Advertising; Public relations; Law; Computer science; Politics; World Wide Web","score_opus":0.014825353117477222,"score_gpt":0.29845969476006107,"score_spread":0.28363434164258383,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4376877431","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01092912,0.005969525,0.0005901241,0.42320648,0.0036667683,0.00005180377,0.0014009981,0.00017921702,0.554006],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3435835,0.0077010025,0.0014032542,0.19622989,0.0026173147,0.00006738293,0.0010117204,0.00039160796,0.4469944],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99392265,0.00056019926,0.000112854315,0.0005249703,0.0030809962,0.0017984477],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98954123,0.0023456058,0.00016859394,0.00035495695,0.004731652,0.002858117],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0047471663,0.00036346377,0.00039639603,0.0018893211,0.017979734,0.01322426,0.0023334913,0.007517775,0.03998927],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014109216,0.0004205586,0.0005350092,0.003817407,0.0055679656,0.0036844641,0.0024773427,0.008410965,0.0027769632],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000416625,0.0000108324075,0.0006293002,0.00007188509,0.0000055239693,0.00010993957,0.0018049667,0.00011105637,0.00016757245,0.3317766,0.64605135,0.019219343],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013796411,0.0000073233764,0.0019744523,0.00013704885,0.0000068552004,0.00003842946,0.0022438082,0.00011844652,0.00011243354,0.005187763,0.9901271,0.000032589232],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96537894,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9766913,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.061751533,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.061751533,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12047032,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.44804078},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4377080528","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780192844477.002.0011","title":"Canada","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Geography","score_opus":0.01572854066853991,"score_gpt":0.2824721603607427,"score_spread":0.2667436196922028,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4377080528","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00083082845,0.0006292324,0.00029516092,0.0033886984,0.0005312137,0.000118715776,0.020331314,0.00044140033,0.97343326],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0015247688,0.00022636857,0.00014953775,0.00040511927,0.000024282594,0.000021067768,0.0012063892,0.00011997022,0.99632263],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99759775,0.0000883809,0.000059166043,0.00025107717,0.0014369001,0.000566592],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9935063,0.00049052085,0.00010204514,0.00042622458,0.004565023,0.00090986624],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011935794,0.001120997,0.0012262668,0.0041874424,0.013757672,0.010763269,0.0021531538,0.0037722886,0.59916735],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0061703515,0.0010896121,0.0010397468,0.004915133,0.0020358495,0.0016845977,0.002015229,0.003236249,0.23255637],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002351894,0.000023798852,0.00031620814,0.00007226259,0.0000062411177,0.00004680557,0.000097911136,0.00009578762,0.000069470596,0.021066366,0.9620859,0.016095748],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010519851,0.0000036400593,0.0011838372,0.00007078428,0.000005087276,0.000015665686,0.00017889384,0.00013836069,0.00012185616,0.0016316602,0.9966273,0.0000124611],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9717419,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98813117,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.40083265,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04579717,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14803776,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4377239287","doi":"10.1515/9780228012252-020","title":"University of Toronto Faculty of Law Legal Process (LAW100HIS – Four Credits) First Year – Winter 2019","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"McGill-Queen's University Press eBooks","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.02175647194421352,"score_gpt":0.23974661510592823,"score_spread":0.21799014316171472,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4377239287","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0013784459,0.0049618823,0.0003278913,0.01531378,0.004298236,0.00009224092,0.0024510834,0.0003885865,0.970788],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.002039851,0.00040975932,0.000058500777,0.00027962282,0.00008485318,0.000008090321,0.00016432928,0.00004570977,0.9969092],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99878615,0.00010289058,0.000033227472,0.00013654598,0.0006179308,0.00032328427],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975618,0.00024144135,0.00006645364,0.00022155968,0.0010365216,0.000872231],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011857332,0.00068923767,0.0005031161,0.0013760469,0.0077056265,0.008743913,0.0011392349,0.00440602,0.5080085],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002646254,0.0007787677,0.00042624646,0.0020052285,0.002168831,0.0020824217,0.002065891,0.0026199103,0.13339347],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006968167,0.000011076001,0.00010490914,0.00002452921,0.0000010455067,0.00002831746,0.0001580925,0.000037974343,0.000053020096,0.009516953,0.9793149,0.010742188],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000035890528,0.0000050009016,0.0008637463,0.000051788906,0.0000011696961,0.00001201684,0.00021360021,0.0000444017,0.000062661646,0.0007593487,0.9979786,0.000004105297],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.60913885,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8713293,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.60913885,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.025341708,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.023002464,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.78632605},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4377254407","doi":"10.1515/9780773580961-003","title":"The Relationship of International and Domestic Law as Understood in Canada","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"McGill-Queen's University Press eBooks","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Geography","score_opus":0.019466403389846003,"score_gpt":0.2359486315445049,"score_spread":0.2164822281546589,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4377254407","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.025026351,0.010762303,0.0016824818,0.020421015,0.00034795888,0.000038488048,0.0002751883,0.00006334796,0.9413828],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7533,0.009953943,0.0018923522,0.0045737573,0.0001123268,0.00008147817,0.00013830578,0.0001575016,0.22979034],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9955042,0.0005505177,0.000082939994,0.00035797956,0.0014294623,0.0020750065],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99825937,0.00052774505,0.0000922723,0.00007905862,0.000576714,0.00046498355],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012508103,0.00058016385,0.0007204243,0.0035880543,0.026451368,0.024099017,0.0026077132,0.0041431636,0.015161854],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0045112767,0.00068028364,0.0004988423,0.010892284,0.025785109,0.00460658,0.004047576,0.0074126874,0.0007800923],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000056134772,0.0000067365318,0.00033920284,0.000023752811,0.0000036556098,0.00008142142,0.011020242,0.00025336308,0.00004848333,0.96985596,0.011344727,0.007016998],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018762039,0.000012094244,0.0058426224,0.00046184336,0.000026084806,0.00013208619,0.041175872,0.0012505546,0.00022205095,0.20891018,0.7418522,0.00009572742],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9966001,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99795157,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23805249,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.23805249,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.31167898,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8837511},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4377261219","doi":"10.1515/9780773559998","title":"Legalizing Misandry","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"McGill-Queen's University Press eBooks","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Geology","score_opus":0.02208816710523791,"score_gpt":0.2450250039522314,"score_spread":0.22293683684699347,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4377261219","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.003827127,0.0069134855,0.008810559,0.06473382,0.0020241097,0.000058477355,0.000047192974,0.00012990036,0.91345537],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.40126386,0.006894352,0.007879854,0.063197955,0.0023060371,0.00027593033,0.000081900485,0.00031881896,0.5177814],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9900282,0.003510716,0.00046019134,0.0013849839,0.0031365615,0.0014794266],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98862934,0.006001786,0.0006135486,0.0017519259,0.0025901257,0.00041334133],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010290107,0.0006125339,0.00070893025,0.0016134836,0.011581325,0.013107245,0.0025069248,0.014247396,0.011886101],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025177458,0.0004941906,0.0006234691,0.0009092436,0.030627942,0.013046314,0.008981981,0.010717859,0.0029929343],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000022687984,0.0000035137023,0.00006863718,0.000015300542,0.0000015663704,0.00008015535,0.002486566,0.000031011787,0.000034908513,0.9713759,0.021524107,0.0043761255],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008360744,0.00000870499,0.0001378248,0.00048719742,0.000013327839,0.0002745075,0.0033778097,0.00021862012,0.00044932347,0.32882917,0.6661761,0.000019071595],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024492616,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.032880258,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024492616,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0069772988,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013575948,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.054419935},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4378193692","doi":"10.52975/llt.2023v91.002","title":"Editors’ Note / Note de la rédaction","year":2023,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Labour / Le Travail","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan; Mount Royal University","funders":"","keywords":"Redaction; Philosophy; Theology","score_opus":0.015226853676384607,"score_gpt":0.3030467427302455,"score_spread":0.2878198890538609,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4378193692","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00012029131,0.0020935957,0.00018900186,0.33564332,0.65957355,0.000033759046,0.00017701571,0.000061410676,0.002108063],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.002448313,0.0024981233,0.0009807129,0.48569757,0.47678754,0.00016772687,0.000106162384,0.000086668704,0.031227108],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9842039,0.002208731,0.0029712543,0.0025053718,0.0063125063,0.0017982253],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8965315,0.03679189,0.006981757,0.004825758,0.048342027,0.0065269875],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013982811,0.0017369218,0.0037262042,0.0023283684,0.005148374,0.011425004,0.0069763213,0.045874696,0.021708252],"category_scores_gemma":[0.13848278,0.0015035234,0.00383621,0.002026415,0.004143443,0.0052233604,0.0041514034,0.04426814,0.022117306],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001582972,0.000008002199,0.00007743519,0.00008660271,0.000012160471,0.00017986097,0.000059950886,0.000014501129,0.00005827843,0.00056053675,0.99647576,0.0024510936],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000027051228,0.000011550114,0.000349594,0.00032763672,0.00003035647,0.00037749615,0.00019726307,0.00012271857,0.00016887004,0.0008650224,0.99748576,0.000036695306],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012660175,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021848693,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.045874696,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006113442,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013054568,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0739491},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4379530600","doi":"10.1017/s0069005800011139","title":"I. Commerce","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Yearbook of international Law/Annuaire canadien de droit international","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Content (measure theory); Computer science; Information retrieval; World Wide Web; Database; Business; Internet privacy; Mathematics","score_opus":0.008728747301879593,"score_gpt":0.25316628782322925,"score_spread":0.24443754052134967,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4379530600","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00053826236,0.00088490086,0.00020358154,0.0033171917,0.00030822793,0.000021787364,0.0008473267,0.00011218142,0.9937664],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.028867755,0.0034897295,0.00050495303,0.005416679,0.00053310994,0.00006211511,0.0023086348,0.00023284629,0.95858413],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99856335,0.00017480561,0.00005307458,0.000292487,0.0006085712,0.00030772993],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982765,0.00021639255,0.00014596179,0.00036926873,0.0006050081,0.00038682352],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000921319,0.00047402806,0.00040404964,0.001983925,0.0028718193,0.01217067,0.0011610758,0.0021685646,0.4004394],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004538294,0.00025768927,0.0003963352,0.004068223,0.0015668299,0.0060729007,0.0026266,0.0026903704,0.25756112],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030463525,0.000048083937,0.001609638,0.00013355172,0.0000050090225,0.00009397711,0.00062563305,0.00004299239,0.00017158507,0.23028515,0.6879554,0.0789985],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000027331723,0.0000058378446,0.00072487985,0.00012466291,0.0000019021007,0.00007753425,0.000298756,0.000023494362,0.000046749345,0.0049058823,0.99378294,0.000004565819],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017580688,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016852079,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9824193,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00317454,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003950993,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8552004},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4379531584","doi":"10.1017/s006900580001119x","title":"Canadian Cases in Private International Law in 2013 / Jurisprudence canadienne en matière de droit international privé en 2013","year":2014,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Yearbook of international Law/Annuaire canadien de droit international","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Political science; Law; Library science; Computer science","score_opus":0.006593393487994693,"score_gpt":0.24028775102706204,"score_spread":0.23369435753906734,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4379531584","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06912848,0.02705533,0.0011467598,0.06095307,0.001544068,0.0001805969,0.005929484,0.00023873257,0.8338235],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.58600825,0.014615854,0.0019757838,0.013889321,0.00038305167,0.00011111384,0.0015523273,0.00017946561,0.38128492],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99334985,0.00030620268,0.0001313725,0.0003409628,0.0034476114,0.0024241228],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963108,0.000808422,0.00020682125,0.00016844862,0.0016764383,0.00082914194],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031629347,0.00046330303,0.0006386297,0.0033212344,0.0195593,0.008319129,0.0017291171,0.003726087,0.012142113],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008573399,0.0006835405,0.0006669108,0.009792283,0.0057194578,0.0012728876,0.002323513,0.004723747,0.0007182231],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000049564314,0.000036802245,0.0027830333,0.00014717037,0.00002062439,0.00055402704,0.009317657,0.00051593466,0.00023143215,0.6386158,0.32460067,0.023127342],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020117815,0.0000100677225,0.023241084,0.00024516162,0.000034298173,0.00016877291,0.0051789116,0.00050467363,0.00042073027,0.007886275,0.9622136,0.00007634795],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9967128,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9981664,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22860338,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.22860338,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.21304215,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8947107},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4379531609","doi":"10.1017/s0069005800011231","title":"Cross-Border Torts: Canadian-U.S. Litigation Strategies. By Wyatt Pickett. Markham: LexisNexis, 2013. 350 pages.","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Yearbook of international Law/Annuaire canadien de droit international","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Archaeology; Geography","score_opus":0.0075093967714318244,"score_gpt":0.29512337914037384,"score_spread":0.28761398236894203,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4379531609","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002645328,0.54712826,0.0008336282,0.11505894,0.003319839,0.00007925194,0.0057472144,0.00022545063,0.32496208],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.09206161,0.46587622,0.0018934363,0.010289885,0.0009237539,0.00008357045,0.0036839764,0.00015352221,0.42503408],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99815303,0.00008643946,0.000056097124,0.00013093847,0.0010723907,0.0005010594],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99833006,0.00019754701,0.0001380145,0.000043597083,0.0009710603,0.0003197954],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001368557,0.0017475637,0.0005127095,0.007215371,0.012607752,0.007555081,0.0022652089,0.004572117,0.03868142],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00406875,0.0011373456,0.00074798876,0.017109646,0.005504038,0.0043784934,0.0022112455,0.0031135115,0.0047152666],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000073654155,0.000008696783,0.0006042354,0.00010529709,0.0000036982763,0.0000517965,0.0006888365,0.00010341282,0.000024350267,0.02776665,0.92835444,0.042281236],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008193866,0.000005391055,0.01405336,0.0010484849,0.000020303005,0.00014823352,0.0029112906,0.00020988674,0.00008786818,0.010587713,0.9708793,0.000040081435],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99029505,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.996594,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.093734,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.093734,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13236287,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.680091},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4379531681","doi":"10.1017/s0069005800011292","title":"Index of Cases / Index de la jurisprudence","year":2014,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Yearbook of international Law/Annuaire canadien de droit international","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Index (typography); Jurisprudence; Statistics; Mathematics; Political science; Law; Computer science","score_opus":0.007211791566789055,"score_gpt":0.26286725545028017,"score_spread":0.25565546388349114,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4379531681","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0028291557,0.015773037,0.00357333,0.0031753983,0.0013262036,0.00036527094,0.029123792,0.00086344755,0.9429703],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.117224015,0.07342258,0.029843122,0.0023804824,0.0041132616,0.0013244693,0.08782607,0.002156666,0.68170923],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9950624,0.00062392483,0.0005383941,0.0004032097,0.002981262,0.0003907778],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99606955,0.0011012305,0.00046150485,0.0005546528,0.00144121,0.00037183068],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022091726,0.00076938974,0.0008657058,0.02721613,0.0031172584,0.008658328,0.0014173088,0.0013611517,0.12708148],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008791949,0.00068944565,0.00054111215,0.020684624,0.0014403894,0.004570355,0.0022036058,0.0020251232,0.049792368],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000034023902,0.000053132444,0.0010261737,0.00046394044,0.000012229078,0.00018928209,0.00058603677,0.00017021298,0.0004656803,0.19702995,0.6509664,0.14900298],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004691065,0.000005312612,0.0018966916,0.00025359332,0.00000441928,0.00029186351,0.00026059907,0.00013690801,0.00021476626,0.015867984,0.9810519,0.000011364731],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019307423,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.017558137,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12708148,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007503394,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0041330396,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4251299},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4381145157","doi":"10.4324/9781003352747","title":"Courts, Pluralism and Law in the Everyday","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Pluralism (philosophy); Law; Law and economics; Political science; Sociology; Epistemology; Philosophy","score_opus":0.030535560266000045,"score_gpt":0.30458137594127493,"score_spread":0.27404581567527486,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4381145157","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14423658,0.03610436,0.0073492685,0.11139296,0.0014346419,0.000052745465,0.00005956462,0.00010384728,0.699266],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9525347,0.0043794005,0.0011748201,0.006204175,0.0006052637,0.000040223025,0.000024531255,0.00004965143,0.034987293],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98569936,0.008660528,0.00042333547,0.0008649285,0.002816891,0.0015349109],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9941282,0.003727218,0.0005980295,0.0004216774,0.0004011861,0.000723691],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004729437,0.000343381,0.00080521114,0.0014079886,0.020400567,0.02348746,0.0016533289,0.0063336464,0.004597941],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008551544,0.00053381873,0.00042017488,0.002169828,0.07636941,0.01574511,0.010542194,0.0070837163,0.0005303854],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000857905,0.000023883913,0.00052913185,0.000050962062,0.0000063256384,0.00041295003,0.1659876,0.00012347702,0.00021487776,0.8169285,0.009042237,0.0066715665],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018316874,0.000037373728,0.0012147785,0.00030172116,0.0000064676683,0.00058328605,0.17557256,0.00017297827,0.00011062166,0.30159935,0.5203448,0.00003769754],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010624114,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012605378,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02348746,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006385177,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004816374,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04632795},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4382246855","doi":"10.4324/9781003312994-1","title":"Introduction","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy","score_opus":0.035352377535896325,"score_gpt":0.291090700144741,"score_spread":0.25573832260884466,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4382246855","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00090109627,0.0071339468,0.003915371,0.00568929,0.00580406,0.00019008624,0.0021324037,0.00081480894,0.97341895],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0042406055,0.00640215,0.003402344,0.0028553559,0.0010562616,0.0001353089,0.002631385,0.0003326164,0.97894394],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992335,0.00008392781,0.000040075152,0.00016570184,0.00038383584,0.00009304538],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994511,0.00010469322,0.000030944484,0.000049906226,0.00026500734,0.00009838845],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00046963655,0.00073720125,0.0005403921,0.0013092733,0.0017203981,0.004417135,0.0016017992,0.0021796767,0.40534815],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0021385592,0.00031125912,0.00048711273,0.0013184607,0.00071050075,0.00331821,0.002338352,0.002006923,0.24670476],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002671345,0.000049328297,0.00028450927,0.00031911998,0.000003022252,0.00017830677,0.0006954661,0.00015365287,0.00039336903,0.051129695,0.7958571,0.15090975],"study_design_scores_gemma":[9.378041e-7,0.000006340313,0.000103439714,0.00009319243,5.013417e-7,0.000086351734,0.000107094354,0.00001663487,0.00003341759,0.0018667546,0.99768317,0.0000021927906],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0026860547,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0034594068,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5946518,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016505404,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016142465,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.84819865},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4382290491","doi":"10.1515/9780228012450-011","title":"British Columbia: Honour and Circumstance; Regulation by Independent Tribunal Avoided","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"McGill-Queen's University Press eBooks","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Honour; Tribunal; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.012101517338838522,"score_gpt":0.20657470230339006,"score_spread":0.19447318496455154,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4382290491","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0053170584,0.018822683,0.0003451131,0.010809525,0.00065059314,0.000048140955,0.00030530634,0.00004578658,0.96365577],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.07975009,0.0063799294,0.00028239304,0.0023876652,0.00008847864,0.000057449874,0.00013748558,0.00004722796,0.9108692],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9986499,0.00020718627,0.000041264957,0.00015348221,0.00050859805,0.00043955928],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999126,0.00017842234,0.000047865124,0.00006468923,0.00040714932,0.00017590157],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00080161134,0.0006200871,0.00044983657,0.0022214814,0.013551761,0.009412958,0.0024455274,0.003813159,0.038069267],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002778699,0.0007005489,0.00023571,0.0064428477,0.0054910504,0.0016968377,0.0017839507,0.0044619236,0.00352221],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026666203,0.000042501306,0.0012549604,0.00013444417,0.0000088371535,0.00032838125,0.009840617,0.0005016984,0.00019243239,0.32394454,0.58905464,0.07467025],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000057702255,0.00000521957,0.00535996,0.0003138106,0.000011198736,0.000052050134,0.007636445,0.00020096944,0.00007176072,0.01304443,0.97326994,0.000028475706],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9799498,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99383366,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06007849,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06007849,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06522563,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.435902},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4383375884","doi":"10.17159/obiter.v44i2.14052","title":"TACIT CHOICE OF LAW IN INTERNATIONAL COMMERCIAL CONTRACTS: PROGRESS OR STAGNATION IN THE COMMON- LAW JURISDICTIONS?","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Obiter","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Common law; Law; Comparative law; Private law; Municipal law; Public law; Commercial law; Choice of law; Civil law (Civil law); Political science; Conflict of laws","score_opus":0.056463391715519694,"score_gpt":0.387100000997883,"score_spread":0.3306366092823633,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4383375884","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.38065344,0.016020307,0.061055265,0.07081755,0.00032416784,0.00021226547,0.00013607927,0.000051167193,0.47072977],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99081224,0.0015910715,0.003510922,0.001055899,0.00007155456,0.000050865845,0.000026112324,0.000013226294,0.0028680817],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97478545,0.011111682,0.001772893,0.0027936618,0.0067957523,0.0027406258],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9550191,0.027244281,0.006623108,0.0043179803,0.0043311636,0.002464349],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02892801,0.00022415377,0.00078178354,0.0029862826,0.0066426103,0.018130992,0.0024029845,0.0035550806,0.0028962714],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0535705,0.0003925562,0.00051429216,0.004715833,0.043019276,0.018376827,0.00912653,0.0062054694,0.0002964304],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000056093854,0.000012591289,0.0009089524,0.000022330316,0.000002866338,0.00003740744,0.0066824094,0.00014495064,0.000037444668,0.98381305,0.00029189803,0.008040521],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017266693,0.000030486231,0.004948277,0.00051181,0.000016106384,0.00014809234,0.013786917,0.0016822167,0.00037516505,0.9438529,0.03458606,0.00004469449],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01568413,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015578265,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02892801,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012038865,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018071018,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15298778},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4384519883","doi":"10.1093/lawfam/ebad017","title":"Cohabitant protection on relationship breakdown in Ireland: A lesson in illusory justice?","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Law Policy and the Family","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statutory law; Irish; Cohabitation; Jurisprudence; General partnership; Political science; Economic Justice; Law; Law reform; Common law","score_opus":0.062315521629999204,"score_gpt":0.36818286033509456,"score_spread":0.30586733870509536,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4384519883","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.26086825,0.005282569,0.004004598,0.41991213,0.0014289118,0.00017763035,0.00015178864,0.000056419456,0.30811775],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9440498,0.0013463468,0.00089522684,0.03977191,0.00023438563,0.00009624527,0.000035398854,0.00002306657,0.013547747],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98460346,0.006296691,0.0005006581,0.0007971656,0.0021193824,0.0056827003],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98522085,0.0045521986,0.0012806325,0.0014067122,0.0025982875,0.0049412465],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.014614166,0.00018329386,0.00057822646,0.0010046776,0.008732963,0.006281717,0.0031201139,0.0043391194,0.008984771],"category_scores_gemma":[0.034935314,0.00027347883,0.0005863505,0.0009279674,0.017494863,0.0068745683,0.014335036,0.008571672,0.0007285321],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00029692662,0.00040791064,0.027126648,0.0004750065,0.000048864924,0.0022110383,0.08480954,0.0004957202,0.0009732545,0.6514253,0.07420424,0.15752551],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013540173,0.00057192025,0.05036879,0.0040850504,0.00008501996,0.0013982594,0.38083634,0.0010093342,0.0015447482,0.19506258,0.36467734,0.00022524694],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.116706066,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.18849267,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.116706066,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012517024,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.031112308,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23205352},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385371242","doi":"10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190202095.002.0003","title":"Copyright Page","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Library science; Political science; Czech; Excellence; Scholarship; Media studies; History; Geography; Law; Sociology","score_opus":0.02876055650433393,"score_gpt":0.32799408821852327,"score_spread":0.2992335317141893,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385371242","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0002304762,0.0007867578,0.00044624985,0.0020305424,0.0061875414,0.000113889306,0.0070999833,0.00082474353,0.98227996],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0013660638,0.0006418051,0.0002562304,0.00092658924,0.00080968486,0.00006362042,0.0043068384,0.0006437738,0.9909854],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985879,0.000128541,0.0001301098,0.00024714338,0.0007597025,0.00014653127],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964734,0.00049393583,0.00013262338,0.0011047792,0.0013957528,0.00039956393],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011494161,0.00075508497,0.0009522539,0.003031825,0.0019188576,0.011896303,0.0014646273,0.0019056458,0.8699914],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0095862085,0.0005438161,0.0007272862,0.0037784562,0.001232574,0.0051160296,0.0027097962,0.0020867425,0.7866964],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000139214335,0.000011132326,0.00007504692,0.0001411425,0.0000023182108,0.000029155419,0.00005885188,0.000017054537,0.000112921225,0.007597045,0.95867836,0.033263035],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000250841,0.000002754897,0.00015615513,0.00008185678,8.684241e-7,0.000023057695,0.00003246937,0.000008819455,0.000039247716,0.0008302932,0.9988194,0.000002515645],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036442517,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0041619833,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13000858,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017268027,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025748217,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18544137},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385394055","doi":"10.1515/9781553394495-012","title":"The Legal Duty to Consult and Canada’s Approach to Aboriginal Consultation and Accommodation","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"McGill-Queen's University Press eBooks","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Accommodation; Duty; Reasonable accommodation; Law; Political science; Psychology","score_opus":0.012460491332992197,"score_gpt":0.2329669783091944,"score_spread":0.2205064869762022,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385394055","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005312488,0.01297309,0.0009186617,0.08808931,0.0019000416,0.00005513578,0.00010690094,0.000035719404,0.8906086],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.18750733,0.008754021,0.0019403307,0.03628836,0.00041037737,0.00010762342,0.000054785804,0.00011883879,0.7648184],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9914426,0.0015099077,0.00019238556,0.0004621284,0.0028972812,0.0034956282],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9963625,0.001185404,0.00010623147,0.00014001683,0.0011482467,0.0010577377],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004108138,0.00060645473,0.0005597835,0.0020854808,0.03701906,0.014582201,0.0026956596,0.013980989,0.015754994],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008998529,0.00090119167,0.0006261688,0.0035847079,0.024744365,0.003947941,0.005217165,0.015306469,0.0012502],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009138509,0.000013289303,0.00021820412,0.000041190353,0.0000049053706,0.00018461626,0.020823972,0.00013590413,0.000039889455,0.81567967,0.15221581,0.010633385],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009697331,0.0000059800127,0.001118473,0.00035752467,0.000011124037,0.00016211632,0.013095493,0.00018930124,0.00005573589,0.038965594,0.94598615,0.000042862062],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9907354,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9965083,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11517664,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11517664,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.32778883,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8356689},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385512612","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.3257","title":"Has the CJPTA readied Canada for the Hague Choice of Court Convention?","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Convention; Law; Jurisdiction; Supreme court; Political science; Choice of law; Conflict of laws; Selection (genetic algorithm); Computer science","score_opus":0.057148745656535785,"score_gpt":0.3242584069041801,"score_spread":0.26710966124764435,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385512612","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.091943644,0.007846938,0.005296772,0.47557658,0.003934265,0.00016173402,0.0008867623,0.000103186874,0.41425002],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7071182,0.004104509,0.003206753,0.22517219,0.0006714518,0.000116529256,0.00030626974,0.000112407935,0.059191775],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97438306,0.0023984623,0.00071643374,0.0027170945,0.012384983,0.0073999367],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96877444,0.010418081,0.0019580286,0.0012666789,0.014442309,0.0031403932],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019064128,0.0002852026,0.0007200207,0.0017625977,0.024021257,0.018594394,0.004270539,0.009782716,0.009094413],"category_scores_gemma":[0.049557094,0.00046384038,0.0008299754,0.0032403849,0.014838952,0.0069646104,0.003450097,0.013173971,0.0008748519],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024798019,0.000027567929,0.005638075,0.000078315854,0.000022648079,0.0003148173,0.009327471,0.00015442139,0.00019949223,0.90811443,0.062274996,0.013822932],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006296105,0.000044174933,0.017802369,0.0010536282,0.00012487885,0.00021430459,0.035462078,0.0006444927,0.0009939801,0.060940135,0.88235414,0.0003028388],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9704085,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9790446,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08888275,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08888275,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.24987572,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6448925},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385594139","doi":"10.59962/9780774836340-026","title":"22 Appointment to the Quebec Court of Appeal, 1979","year":2017,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Law; Political science; Psychology","score_opus":0.02211660874165503,"score_gpt":0.22547751815885028,"score_spread":0.20336090941719526,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385594139","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0052032,0.015687248,0.00039452632,0.048615325,0.005664454,0.00026110315,0.00205025,0.00013685858,0.92198694],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.015727578,0.0013682704,0.00018703207,0.012430023,0.0002597208,0.00010298607,0.00015223982,0.00007002101,0.969702],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960877,0.00036992482,0.00011556954,0.00040376413,0.0011511476,0.0018719804],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977431,0.00050018966,0.000045560006,0.0001010446,0.0012926827,0.0003174845],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025009317,0.0013164656,0.0012816582,0.0033966093,0.044425398,0.014786915,0.0035460736,0.02064554,0.09539406],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008997649,0.0017451663,0.0012319995,0.0031656523,0.0047829943,0.0032649082,0.0026448974,0.015251894,0.013507264],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028220025,0.00003150875,0.00049740844,0.000033099896,0.000009735472,0.00025574554,0.00095946447,0.000105536004,0.00005792964,0.08279877,0.90711683,0.008105745],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020303103,0.0000075328885,0.0023745915,0.00018545437,0.000018981293,0.00006466259,0.0015239023,0.0001621392,0.00012588144,0.0047082785,0.99075645,0.000051876257],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97615594,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99259347,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09539406,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08806404,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12150204,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6389523},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385735616","doi":"10.4337/9781839107108.00015","title":"References","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Edward Elgar Publishing eBooks","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Office on Violence Against Women; Vlaamse regering; Central European University; University of Toronto; Queen's University; European Commission; Queen's University Belfast; Vlaams Instituut voor de Zee; University of Cambridge; Government of Canada; United Nations Development Programme; Australian Government; Directorate-General for Justice; McGill University; University of Oxford; Harvard University; World Bank Group; U.S. Department of Justice","keywords":"Corporate governance; Political science; Rule of law; Law; Public administration; Sociology; Politics; Management; Economics","score_opus":0.07057174785323456,"score_gpt":0.2950307274783182,"score_spread":0.22445897962508365,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385735616","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00018943915,0.0059155715,0.0010956471,0.00379446,0.0034567409,0.00007096709,0.002761728,0.00029262694,0.9824227],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0012436737,0.0039354106,0.0010717022,0.0012370083,0.0004859271,0.00004177621,0.0026992525,0.0003105822,0.9889746],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993825,0.00007679963,0.00002942278,0.00009540866,0.00036009017,0.000055756245],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99928623,0.00014780382,0.000026650714,0.00007560392,0.00039655957,0.000067101435],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004302455,0.0006562649,0.00063593325,0.0033674957,0.0020971997,0.0034227513,0.0014383435,0.0015364556,0.4909573],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0025237855,0.00028182226,0.00048560067,0.004390714,0.00064541947,0.0030771976,0.0016033517,0.0019899786,0.35430986],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005780287,0.000012442094,0.000057933477,0.00009233293,9.698542e-7,0.00003669256,0.00014092698,0.000053420004,0.00005968624,0.023760365,0.9365818,0.039197706],"study_design_scores_gemma":[5.096067e-7,9.902725e-7,0.000048667378,0.00005735611,3.715612e-7,0.000023374612,0.0000448569,0.000007674828,0.00001399231,0.0015013964,0.99829954,0.0000013253435],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009305185,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01617915,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.50904274,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026068215,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016465026,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385745318","doi":"10.59962/9780774819657","title":"Transforming Law’s Family","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Genealogy; Political science; History","score_opus":0.026407515907544286,"score_gpt":0.2091663398537894,"score_spread":0.18275882394624512,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385745318","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004027286,0.019049233,0.0023406644,0.04919348,0.0018177606,0.00003244971,0.000047412446,0.00010914304,0.9233825],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2551386,0.02842162,0.003216495,0.032076966,0.0007499666,0.00007868781,0.00010302767,0.00015056414,0.68006414],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998664,0.00052818755,0.000022767601,0.000094155934,0.00042320843,0.00026772107],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994487,0.00015697403,0.000025743468,0.00005223515,0.00016641986,0.00014987825],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00115668,0.00026056526,0.00019401031,0.00069613574,0.0101893945,0.0052471333,0.00071848114,0.0022093356,0.008774902],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022041544,0.00016862445,0.00021473598,0.0007156204,0.015397731,0.005167692,0.0025809496,0.0038154451,0.0016593523],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000031429079,0.000010754677,0.00014194015,0.000020354832,0.0000012114368,0.00017446003,0.019136209,0.00008522117,0.00007218569,0.78616047,0.15755014,0.0366439],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000012023263,0.000002879454,0.0001355597,0.00008904961,7.094543e-7,0.00011825159,0.004915986,0.000034328277,0.000034473713,0.027592212,0.9670709,0.0000044222356],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.20801838,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.2888422,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20801838,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015385367,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01661412,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4136151},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385860639","doi":"10.59962/9780774855150","title":"The Courts","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.016236545961310123,"score_gpt":0.21948270470363448,"score_spread":0.20324615874232435,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385860639","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00046709448,0.004718713,0.0014465537,0.008449193,0.0008866766,0.00003077203,0.00011084266,0.000059889637,0.9838303],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.027621794,0.003741351,0.0011894995,0.0071121673,0.00050936063,0.000063327236,0.00013617756,0.00007079651,0.9595555],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9975854,0.0004482338,0.00010804649,0.0004670955,0.0010039469,0.0003872105],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988632,0.0002558311,0.00004777315,0.00021416423,0.0005066316,0.000112390255],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012712901,0.0005267983,0.00043282576,0.0012005921,0.005646442,0.010480825,0.0013981741,0.0046220226,0.058184803],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004056745,0.00037467844,0.0003961331,0.0014804848,0.0058671455,0.0057605384,0.0030706308,0.0062890137,0.018003792],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000034438954,0.0000052318683,0.00004681114,0.000017830853,0.0000011668131,0.000028720606,0.00044811593,0.000046415153,0.000044839762,0.87755847,0.10366804,0.018130846],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002805841,0.000003112947,0.000084029656,0.000085554064,0.0000016500699,0.000031292926,0.00025842505,0.000050222265,0.00005592609,0.05223879,0.9471843,0.0000038176363],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.035337046,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04992281,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.058184803,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008793129,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009370919,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385864729","doi":"10.59962/9780774817769-018","title":"Strategic <i>Charter</i> Litigation and the Right to Communicate in Canada","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of British Columbia Press eBooks","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Political science; Business; Public administration; Law","score_opus":0.014879469001190141,"score_gpt":0.18973252159759302,"score_spread":0.17485305259640288,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385864729","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010743153,0.0096439915,0.0008100751,0.051409025,0.0006708761,0.000053345673,0.00028470962,0.000057593912,0.9263272],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.37209597,0.010821538,0.0012460883,0.012107316,0.00018146321,0.00007816196,0.00019015334,0.0001272352,0.60315204],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9938281,0.0005416818,0.00010062201,0.00034045667,0.0020904965,0.0030986415],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99662673,0.0008243887,0.000111742775,0.0001005135,0.0014859261,0.0008506302],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019659288,0.0007995512,0.00070157246,0.0022051246,0.03285671,0.020783829,0.0025600244,0.007347235,0.027066074],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006415899,0.0010280204,0.00047659694,0.005104671,0.013971961,0.0035583815,0.0029685914,0.009904711,0.0018175676],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012757594,0.000018932627,0.0005222232,0.000046131696,0.000007317502,0.00016055144,0.0057434584,0.00044745157,0.00006680326,0.8153598,0.16148381,0.01613076],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023490244,0.000011582681,0.003631264,0.00042618922,0.00002647593,0.00011065566,0.012889201,0.0011225566,0.00025526216,0.07842776,0.90296793,0.0001075375],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.997288,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9984908,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19263826,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.19263826,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.4128433,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9364252},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4385984866","doi":"10.4324/9781003193104-15","title":"International Cooperation and Harmonization in Public Enforcement of the Japanese Competition Law","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Harmonization; Enforcement; Competition law; Competition (biology); International trade; Business; Law enforcement; Law and economics; Political science; Law; Economics; Market economy","score_opus":0.04309322426642152,"score_gpt":0.2786074781034288,"score_spread":0.23551425383700725,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4385984866","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06773024,0.010921378,0.02956838,0.03075508,0.00107312,0.0003210288,0.00010738038,0.00012368556,0.8593997],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8893691,0.0044153705,0.014545179,0.0070400713,0.00043599968,0.0003559284,0.0001793028,0.00007563454,0.08358347],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9885231,0.0045564584,0.0011228679,0.0012587223,0.0027951233,0.0017437753],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9933294,0.0018404593,0.00080222456,0.0010580628,0.002331972,0.0006378614],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013767257,0.00036066704,0.00035896397,0.0023201462,0.004991303,0.0072664884,0.0010489703,0.0025137102,0.0044043865],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011910638,0.00026933197,0.00043718852,0.0026855334,0.00914656,0.0044232598,0.0055894717,0.00268507,0.00045690523],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015933992,0.000047180023,0.0021341091,0.00014070801,0.000015841642,0.00028789334,0.014467935,0.0005314632,0.0004774894,0.92821044,0.01215224,0.041518856],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000029752264,0.00008610285,0.017742291,0.00055276434,0.00005199234,0.00030703598,0.017389748,0.0020757935,0.00087037706,0.25710523,0.7037142,0.00007470721],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.028693698,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02404757,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028693698,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006603205,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018826408,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0728091},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386089148","doi":"10.1017/9781108866477.001","title":"Table of Cases","year":2023,"lang":"pl","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Table (database); Computer science; Information retrieval; Content (measure theory); Database; Table of contents; World Wide Web; Mathematics","score_opus":0.0400005313357244,"score_gpt":0.3222967439980128,"score_spread":0.2822962126622884,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386089148","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0073268414,0.013512382,0.0027970204,0.00668169,0.002206064,0.0018337972,0.42118374,0.0008434015,0.5436151],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.121476464,0.0474058,0.00675604,0.011354551,0.0022825403,0.0049254256,0.5113212,0.001214373,0.29326352],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99812585,0.00027814406,0.0003535593,0.00032192495,0.0006621213,0.00025846655],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99613816,0.0011680826,0.0007202764,0.00023208372,0.0013812429,0.00036005257],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00071763503,0.00074085256,0.0008161923,0.009521595,0.0012772329,0.0018046544,0.0012999746,0.0008786325,0.36235356],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01124717,0.00039039575,0.000741637,0.0061395294,0.00034402125,0.0014453585,0.0008014957,0.00085332495,0.07668778],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000098252895,0.00003387608,0.0036511072,0.0009070059,0.00003216616,0.00084133295,0.0001138729,0.0001289692,0.000118818905,0.005337156,0.94927955,0.039457954],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006840746,0.000053134525,0.016398575,0.004042227,0.000077426565,0.004553169,0.0007978803,0.00011645582,0.0002502952,0.0064501744,0.96715957,0.000032779026],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010974364,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011549114,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.63764644,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021541826,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002553414,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9095253},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4386546524","doi":"10.1017/cyl.2023.6","title":"Canadian Cases in Private International Law in 2022","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Yearbook of international Law/Annuaire canadien de droit international","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Conflict of laws; Content (measure theory); Law; Business; Link (geometry); Political science; Law and economics; Internet privacy; Computer science; Sociology; Mathematics; Computer network","score_opus":0.011934730073365147,"score_gpt":0.2677654424157692,"score_spread":0.25583071234240407,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4386546524","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.044543486,0.009026979,0.00041171067,0.06996592,0.0015983864,0.0001389324,0.004569832,0.00014207512,0.86960274],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.50265694,0.0052011716,0.00083934166,0.04152951,0.000426651,0.00012833318,0.0018523111,0.0001226724,0.44724312],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99129254,0.0003682768,0.0001300772,0.00043433893,0.003286805,0.0044878563],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99526936,0.0005813038,0.00020172131,0.00028307567,0.0020050183,0.0016595653],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00276763,0.00053001544,0.00052396697,0.0027801078,0.023281919,0.009337695,0.002337492,0.008749337,0.020990007],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010139348,0.0007800634,0.0007118667,0.00628691,0.004807578,0.0022003234,0.003661817,0.00642122,0.0016034372],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000057157897,0.00004927643,0.0034554522,0.00009480027,0.000025369662,0.00084829435,0.0051830695,0.0003675762,0.00021671005,0.41606385,0.558092,0.0155464895],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003827741,0.000012044659,0.02264798,0.00020572662,0.000040411425,0.00025874897,0.0059272163,0.0005221337,0.00032711274,0.008551259,0.9613788,0.00009024488],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99570686,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9982527,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16066936,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.16066936,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.16866042,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9735046},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387067447","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.4576144","title":"Does a Refusal of Treatment need to be Informed? Towards a Resolution of the Current Confusion in English, Canadian and Australian Common Law","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Atlantic School of Theology","funders":"","keywords":"Confusion; Current (fluid); Law; Common law; Resolution (logic); Political science; Psychology; Engineering; Computer science; Psychoanalysis","score_opus":0.02293978546494002,"score_gpt":0.3158380909988425,"score_spread":0.2928983055339025,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387067447","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013415002,0.003516509,0.002000825,0.949679,0.0017799195,0.000036190206,0.000045343277,0.00002354618,0.02950362],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.64882106,0.0066976156,0.006924351,0.32156795,0.002054515,0.00010097042,0.00008980229,0.00012482364,0.013618882],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.93431616,0.022005638,0.0055681854,0.0050060963,0.018145384,0.01495864],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8355536,0.09147238,0.010784185,0.00591911,0.038019024,0.01825168],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.10417369,0.00037705715,0.0015756013,0.003687625,0.026770692,0.021469124,0.007990122,0.026803752,0.005459738],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1931723,0.0011441512,0.0011822663,0.0044728434,0.055319935,0.015950011,0.009954904,0.036861915,0.0005463856],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005903828,0.00004847241,0.0066184024,0.0003606036,0.000048816677,0.0013540547,0.12573849,0.00024177661,0.00026563767,0.73362035,0.08526269,0.04638176],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008376666,0.000056097713,0.017358262,0.0062178005,0.00018842593,0.0015168928,0.21460922,0.0014628089,0.00051629293,0.30587044,0.45160082,0.00051926036],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8649693,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9197316,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13503069,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.079278104,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.32623056,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.57520556},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387616837","doi":"10.4324/9781003315926-15","title":"Winds of Change in Common Law Jurisdictions","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Uniwersytet Jagielloński w Krakowie","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.12775045332078735,"score_gpt":0.35558995092702883,"score_spread":0.22783949760624148,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387616837","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.063342445,0.006105137,0.005163727,0.04260446,0.00042835897,0.000061748106,0.00007652935,0.000036584686,0.882181],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9577191,0.00165473,0.00092999905,0.004811201,0.00018754945,0.000072266695,0.00004420626,0.000037507634,0.03454345],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99007714,0.004065818,0.00019513899,0.0011023692,0.0026047751,0.001954807],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970541,0.0010941138,0.00026349537,0.00028450266,0.0008199121,0.00048386998],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005728481,0.00017967918,0.0003967187,0.0030559914,0.014290945,0.01497466,0.0011313909,0.0035540084,0.008835308],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009342147,0.00036217135,0.000492505,0.0033259762,0.03283429,0.01054306,0.009023737,0.00722425,0.00071708916],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000017309835,0.0000031974218,0.00009270184,0.0000028937254,5.6992354e-7,0.00002460692,0.0040187975,0.000034645796,0.000011865462,0.99333537,0.0013415116,0.0011320753],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001815114,0.000017791139,0.0015198924,0.00018471817,0.000005005918,0.0001295256,0.019335976,0.00036785868,0.00009474307,0.62035275,0.35795137,0.00002227505],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03418819,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.02874145,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03418819,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.019908613,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010289933,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1444478},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4387698691","doi":"10.32782/2524-0374/2023-9/72","title":"RECOGNITION AND ENFORCEMENT OF DECISIONS OF FOREIGN COURTS IN CIVIL CASES IN CANADA","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Juridical scientific and electronic journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Enforcement; Law; Political science; Business; Criminology; Psychology","score_opus":0.03668277065668941,"score_gpt":0.28246599564490976,"score_spread":0.24578322498822036,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4387698691","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.93827075,0.0014009412,0.00040810756,0.014080685,0.00017748418,0.00016513931,0.0005523981,0.000022924643,0.04492149],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98915803,0.00037477104,0.00023766665,0.0012623367,0.00002448412,0.00001723521,0.00013217321,0.0000061980745,0.008787162],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99321085,0.00070823915,0.000348286,0.00056843035,0.0020896683,0.0030745235],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9812268,0.0045923516,0.003261086,0.0004081335,0.0073106256,0.0032011052],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00501659,0.00016524133,0.0003581407,0.0020768128,0.01068756,0.0054142335,0.001971055,0.0026933711,0.0039676973],"category_scores_gemma":[0.038250472,0.00029540432,0.00024914058,0.002823989,0.0026961584,0.0008635757,0.0019588787,0.0028905238,0.00035078003],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008067055,0.00043907942,0.6383152,0.00034521075,0.00019597371,0.004330103,0.062367905,0.0025949294,0.001683519,0.06172165,0.09782921,0.12937056],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010596837,0.0001272216,0.8173225,0.00042893825,0.00015396575,0.0006545064,0.07133903,0.0047779744,0.0022924896,0.005062785,0.09756024,0.00017432816],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98207915,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99335724,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0545435,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0545435,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1267144,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3957426},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388094158","doi":"10.5539/ass.v19n6p53","title":"Research on Relevant Issues Regarding the Creditor’s Right of Revocation in the Chinese Civil Code","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Asian Social Science","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Revocation; Creditor; Debtor; Civil code; Business; Law and economics; Enforcement; Debt; Law; Subrogation; Political science; Economics; Actuarial science; Finance; Computer science","score_opus":0.05659898153777028,"score_gpt":0.4369740911129814,"score_spread":0.38037510957521115,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388094158","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3195247,0.026330482,0.0072164666,0.061982002,0.000817461,0.00018940412,0.00020619156,0.000022696664,0.58371055],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9697192,0.009626287,0.00057475705,0.0023606413,0.0003332748,0.000060834,0.000067174566,0.000008310388,0.017249562],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99607074,0.0010124422,0.00025755315,0.00063841656,0.00116244,0.00085842697],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98718345,0.008369167,0.0016993925,0.00046883887,0.0017860695,0.0004930748],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0057716486,0.00030232995,0.00043588248,0.0029486641,0.0074752965,0.0070914812,0.0012399672,0.0029214018,0.01296795],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0147643555,0.00028343577,0.00048725551,0.004733313,0.010394145,0.010026521,0.0015715618,0.0041893935,0.00041866378],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011997063,0.000029195335,0.0061926562,0.00017554729,0.000009391706,0.00035945585,0.0139779365,0.00019365897,0.00012881929,0.95805466,0.003507696,0.017359],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000039958384,0.000107784384,0.12657674,0.003591773,0.00019175324,0.00088380865,0.08636053,0.0039986554,0.001556862,0.4677699,0.3087365,0.00018568343],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.062606074,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.072161354,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.062606074,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.014988361,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015952697,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12448335},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388175518","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780199250080.001.0001","title":"Reform and Development of Private International Law","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Conflict of laws; Private law; Comity; Law; Political science; International law; Comparative law; Common law; Sociology; Jurisdiction","score_opus":0.03346444341505439,"score_gpt":0.286945276979848,"score_spread":0.2534808335647936,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388175518","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.018541295,0.0034263406,0.011918809,0.06365132,0.00054294954,0.000058364392,0.00005197149,0.000079399186,0.90172946],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.84599364,0.0033508595,0.004941055,0.009774989,0.0010952485,0.00015440657,0.00011405526,0.00006794651,0.13450775],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9924194,0.0031446302,0.0002877398,0.00083794055,0.0023090022,0.0010013434],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99472344,0.0014187626,0.00044099154,0.0011365846,0.0016250836,0.00065514265],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006878798,0.0002588893,0.0003700238,0.0016779589,0.0045623374,0.0110700615,0.0010374745,0.0035564865,0.008072142],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014409324,0.0002726928,0.000364519,0.0012393999,0.01815779,0.009175001,0.009223438,0.00527539,0.0010870493],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000012802378,0.00000931008,0.00003599799,0.000008184256,5.589991e-7,0.000010792385,0.00072842004,0.000097563534,0.000028884702,0.9924845,0.0027712528,0.0038231618],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001484052,0.00002045355,0.00041314884,0.0001609364,0.0000037400923,0.000040217106,0.0014505121,0.00082011835,0.00020385673,0.680484,0.3163782,0.0000099683775],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0048578554,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030357086,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0110700615,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010474797,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011645051,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07600033},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388175659","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780199243396.001.0001","title":"Res Judicata, Estoppel, and Foreign Judgments","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":156,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Res judicata; Law; Estoppel; Jurisdiction; Political science; Statutory law; Civil procedure; Context (archaeology); Doctrine; History","score_opus":0.026572777567814107,"score_gpt":0.2985802656244782,"score_spread":0.2720074880566641,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388175659","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01816058,0.013846987,0.0050229994,0.010412135,0.0009969422,0.000035677105,0.000046145353,0.000045348643,0.95143324],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7042314,0.009816229,0.0019138644,0.008821842,0.0022910023,0.000095180934,0.00008011676,0.00008137733,0.27266896],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99619377,0.0016032994,0.0001446836,0.0003470569,0.0012465537,0.00046469274],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99744934,0.0018428339,0.00017686085,0.00018823636,0.00024172237,0.00010107479],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016612413,0.00035594453,0.00036735553,0.00070689083,0.0018833831,0.006654266,0.00075973134,0.002646275,0.0057757595],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0048248107,0.00023868846,0.0003577532,0.00056881004,0.009993632,0.0038094094,0.002336316,0.005553055,0.000836714],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008611625,0.000010438407,0.0001424198,0.000025744059,0.0000024724113,0.00014452275,0.0012582692,0.00017168265,0.000102130645,0.98438,0.007994659,0.0057590543],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019912704,0.00012331067,0.002470711,0.0006161252,0.00001955764,0.000458916,0.0051861987,0.0011003597,0.0009313932,0.4252956,0.56373864,0.000039302144],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0050089625,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00820462,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006654266,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031253207,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002070881,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.022675931},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388175754","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780199250080.003.0003","title":"Reform Of Private International Law By Judges: Canada As A Case Study","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislature; Law; Political science; Conflict of laws; Legislative process; Common law","score_opus":0.023869414797512114,"score_gpt":0.28149691261571935,"score_spread":0.25762749781820726,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388175754","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.38639,0.005238526,0.002022223,0.05029899,0.00053174293,0.0004004653,0.0004481967,0.00010033941,0.5545695],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.92722917,0.0025744059,0.00156879,0.0049925246,0.000087353495,0.00011859586,0.0001305066,0.000034313853,0.06326446],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99234337,0.0012666477,0.00011683665,0.00037105868,0.0025141889,0.003387891],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9934214,0.001880337,0.00020808638,0.00023656104,0.0027556836,0.001497992],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035268387,0.0003892905,0.00050102646,0.0022458471,0.034692027,0.009718021,0.0026787475,0.0056982944,0.0052854987],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007945864,0.00036597115,0.00037765934,0.005816912,0.007167728,0.0016634926,0.0030792917,0.0043226457,0.00027547602],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008833696,0.0003034072,0.009816196,0.00020237817,0.000028894756,0.005712834,0.05518956,0.0031294671,0.00093354,0.7640307,0.11840347,0.042161215],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001770446,0.000119823395,0.019371068,0.0004430911,0.00010070723,0.0008086757,0.1077055,0.006002171,0.001137945,0.028444368,0.83552325,0.00016639323],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9857465,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.995105,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12489495,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.12489495,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14683692,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9061805},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4388850007","doi":"10.24908/cmj.v23i2.16959","title":"After Arbour — “Reimagining” RMC","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Military Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Memorial University of Newfoundland","keywords":"Art","score_opus":0.01528573848852906,"score_gpt":0.28191235358199157,"score_spread":0.2666266150934625,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4388850007","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.049952164,0.0034423505,0.009589838,0.350524,0.027294884,0.00046423718,0.0002832293,0.00082313793,0.55762607],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.31987455,0.0006850608,0.0049671764,0.17360315,0.002579376,0.00020887157,0.00015354178,0.0004852986,0.497443],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9871717,0.0017220896,0.00036380644,0.0010998698,0.003860319,0.005782223],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9889944,0.0014951458,0.0002995429,0.0014182958,0.0051688724,0.0026236924],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008998206,0.0004905573,0.0005772901,0.001448772,0.020993901,0.012102722,0.0031498952,0.011785187,0.026902128],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030372787,0.00049838313,0.00077107426,0.0010555645,0.009176392,0.0055612763,0.006889047,0.018373393,0.005024646],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007613817,0.000103904305,0.0018753028,0.000078694364,0.000023835873,0.001049962,0.007701623,0.00026645444,0.0009985944,0.46159595,0.4682049,0.05802465],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015801117,0.000040969353,0.002053711,0.00012959357,0.000014676104,0.00021775153,0.0038919304,0.00025623458,0.0007563864,0.018203259,0.974358,0.00006169156],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.23923548,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.36214772,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23923548,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018302638,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.049849212,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4756859},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389333524","doi":"10.7202/1105874ar","title":"IMPLICIT COMPARATIVE LAW","year":2013,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue de droit Université de Sherbrooke","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Oxford; University of Cambridge; McGill University; Louisiana State University","keywords":"Law; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.016513483265602508,"score_gpt":0.2422702281938782,"score_spread":0.2257567449282757,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389333524","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0041037835,0.010754902,0.020546284,0.009848653,0.0005696773,0.000025100484,0.00020449577,0.00007028175,0.9538768],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6234076,0.012770305,0.015623835,0.00785835,0.0024497986,0.00028814882,0.00062609307,0.0003112724,0.33666465],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965796,0.0015663396,0.00013203564,0.00076586904,0.0007082125,0.00024801324],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975146,0.0013286558,0.00015646644,0.00052411616,0.00039567307,0.00008050938],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032260076,0.0005638532,0.0006551435,0.0020772635,0.00446877,0.006833265,0.0013010479,0.002804256,0.03379656],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0068639405,0.00029175283,0.0007131358,0.0022822982,0.011516489,0.009407211,0.0032128447,0.0040072165,0.0037436525],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000017614108,0.0000013422284,0.000038210885,0.0000124682265,0.0000013790785,0.000007065365,0.00019961398,0.00003279128,0.000011361136,0.9955752,0.0018223076,0.0022964159],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004446222,0.000005311656,0.0001922069,0.00008567136,0.000005209332,0.000051156796,0.00022723404,0.00031124294,0.00008459947,0.78985006,0.20917836,0.0000045345173],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0048183855,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0063341926,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03379656,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007062384,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025975027,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11306071},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389355543","doi":"10.7202/1105714ar","title":"LE RÉGIME QUÉBÉCOIS D’ASSURANCE PARENTALE : UN SYSTÈME DISCRIMINATOIRE À L’ENDROIT DES ENFANTS ADOPTÉS","year":2016,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue de droit Université de Sherbrooke","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal; Ministère de l’Emploi et de la Solidarité Sociale (Québec); Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Art","score_opus":0.009513186058202143,"score_gpt":0.21325177859630465,"score_spread":0.2037385925381025,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389355543","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.53520983,0.0042076055,0.011332906,0.046296168,0.0005689,0.00028103852,0.00089068507,0.00013431336,0.40107846],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.93795645,0.00072019483,0.0033647455,0.002827696,0.00005004561,0.00014075504,0.00013388443,0.00002737784,0.054778773],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957209,0.0013979401,0.00013424749,0.0005543244,0.001137773,0.0010548502],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99482876,0.0012084476,0.0005575267,0.0006093218,0.001953841,0.0008421863],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0043159234,0.00026619347,0.00032006108,0.00093615794,0.007231069,0.00404439,0.0011125188,0.0015846482,0.005467068],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008151759,0.00021557255,0.00024909235,0.0011666635,0.004885389,0.001204917,0.0016602537,0.002475637,0.0002830677],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012940748,0.000049061546,0.054612115,0.00013539146,0.000047001624,0.0008263487,0.06565527,0.0007637638,0.0015476972,0.7598281,0.027030762,0.08937506],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006963438,0.00015848492,0.19941975,0.0011155987,0.00009184764,0.00048322335,0.03283372,0.0019050856,0.0015622224,0.028822737,0.7333454,0.00019238537],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.85102403,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.87692827,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14897597,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02681859,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.037237976,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.29970658},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389612478","doi":"10.4337/9781800889866.00046","title":"Right of recourse against third parties","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Edward Elgar Publishing eBooks","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Computer science; Law and economics; Economics","score_opus":0.038970532001059995,"score_gpt":0.27488210162930415,"score_spread":0.23591156962824417,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389612478","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0038528482,0.0013847488,0.0056054606,0.009794934,0.0003540249,0.000053750868,0.00009013362,0.00006963432,0.9787946],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.38087985,0.0021084002,0.007401365,0.027169777,0.0010497592,0.00046232223,0.00025915125,0.00017286366,0.58049655],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9866549,0.0025046896,0.0007099999,0.002094257,0.005391017,0.0026451165],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9948224,0.0020413701,0.000347952,0.0013804673,0.0011296828,0.00027816923],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008281132,0.0006491656,0.0010050668,0.0012817218,0.0054290565,0.010288136,0.0025679364,0.012645901,0.014572325],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010734616,0.0007122369,0.0016359657,0.0008553752,0.015149634,0.0050334,0.0072944066,0.011107694,0.0065167174],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000420409,0.0000060975785,0.000045751818,0.000008876393,0.0000021616381,0.000060507176,0.00073156226,0.000041978506,0.00013369422,0.99055123,0.005941536,0.0024723026],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019036444,0.0000294691,0.0003287486,0.0002412992,0.000021705457,0.0003813747,0.0005319268,0.0003642832,0.001014346,0.42064252,0.5763853,0.0000398139],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.027894398,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.020674272,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027894398,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0063981107,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0149721075,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05546409},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4389703888","doi":"10.1017/9780511843280.012","title":"Cambridge Studies in International and Comparative Law","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Content (measure theory); Political science; Link (geometry); Law; Computer science; Law and economics; Information retrieval; Mathematics; Sociology; Computer network","score_opus":0.1774137959823022,"score_gpt":0.4383854440602534,"score_spread":0.26097164807795126,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4389703888","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0025942586,0.08329745,0.00032759694,0.04794321,0.00157075,0.000022408505,0.0014546533,0.000056464167,0.86273324],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3743483,0.11901487,0.00087620737,0.010856617,0.0088812895,0.00024784217,0.0032528227,0.0002278574,0.48229417],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998961,0.00043214925,0.00005535547,0.00011726176,0.0003228457,0.00011134089],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99772626,0.0013033921,0.00012470684,0.00024795855,0.00040420739,0.00019352752],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014348666,0.00041851948,0.00052634365,0.004216335,0.0017113433,0.0061248825,0.0006162267,0.0015563063,0.09317478],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004490693,0.00016173754,0.00021712606,0.005793618,0.004338316,0.0034118614,0.0012695584,0.0016920592,0.006445827],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008761503,0.000011313903,0.0002910504,0.00020128506,0.000004869911,0.0000370202,0.001863618,0.00010585927,0.0000476633,0.6070356,0.37295297,0.017440056],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000058671217,0.000010009994,0.002647444,0.00093160436,0.0000047810213,0.00003240363,0.0016640119,0.00007439849,0.000046224515,0.044627555,0.94994843,0.0000073931074],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.052985016,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.044121373,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.90682524,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011014454,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019576084,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3117007},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390279131","doi":"10.18356/9789213584712c002","title":"No. 53597. Canada and Israel","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"United Nations Treaty Series","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Geography; Political science","score_opus":0.022014136884480395,"score_gpt":0.2501456423061326,"score_spread":0.22813150542165223,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390279131","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00033151524,0.0078348145,0.00014430177,0.003207353,0.0008927668,0.000039165196,0.0022933746,0.00011753398,0.9851392],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00072199485,0.0005452115,0.000031809457,0.00037302315,0.00003690359,0.000008322871,0.00020421356,0.000025664278,0.99805295],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9996735,0.000015254882,0.00000848934,0.000052964606,0.00016797495,0.00008187125],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99959975,0.000053899676,0.000016142307,0.000022185195,0.00024855614,0.000059544287],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00032964355,0.00079356914,0.0005087907,0.0015771405,0.004726027,0.0033130099,0.001155658,0.0025165982,0.3703258],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00088030176,0.0005371517,0.00022093556,0.0023744386,0.00083499076,0.001201837,0.00075555284,0.002334172,0.13479722],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014696307,0.000008488941,0.00008932708,0.000042121912,0.0000014458399,0.000025652334,0.000093168295,0.00004935929,0.00008940029,0.017930817,0.95138454,0.030270947],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000018789721,0.0000013684291,0.00027198324,0.00003539391,6.620112e-7,0.000009731283,0.000047047695,0.000018312381,0.000034347377,0.0004260856,0.9991509,0.000002286712],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.72763515,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9091625,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3703258,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011200876,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009906647,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.89815384},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390460676","doi":"10.54783/endlessjournal.v6i3.230","title":"Problems Faced by Duty to Consult and the Protection of Aboriginal Peoples in Canada","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"ENDLESS International Journal of Future Studies","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Doctrine; Indigenous; Duty; Law; Constitution; Legislature; Political science; Government (linguistics); Governor; Engineering","score_opus":0.01650022742376678,"score_gpt":0.3327897669708928,"score_spread":0.316289539547126,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390460676","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.517051,0.009325601,0.0027566382,0.25822526,0.00070646836,0.00016126382,0.00018640007,0.000042229083,0.21154514],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96423995,0.0029110622,0.0013531378,0.015904922,0.00007055498,0.000035742363,0.000037175178,0.000018959287,0.015428535],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98055285,0.0026262954,0.0005395463,0.0010520753,0.008397756,0.0068313857],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9839469,0.004503202,0.0011966708,0.0005087852,0.0050522,0.004792333],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010668584,0.0002053567,0.00052987755,0.0017729299,0.041456122,0.00975423,0.003323252,0.005329988,0.0035621875],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019007515,0.0005361228,0.00054131384,0.0030030936,0.019407975,0.0026265574,0.0071561383,0.008435087,0.00015462884],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006419024,0.00011129147,0.04462963,0.00022482181,0.000065430184,0.003719144,0.19680195,0.0010402806,0.00080260105,0.644871,0.0366214,0.07104831],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000048152335,0.00007260932,0.08296614,0.0014823402,0.000108567816,0.0018541123,0.38828298,0.0021373604,0.0007812627,0.06714706,0.45477298,0.0003464202],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99271846,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9961009,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13352261,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13352261,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.334909,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9687789},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390495711","doi":"10.1139/cjb-2023-0122","title":"Note of appreciation","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Botany","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Biology; Botany","score_opus":0.017861977744421404,"score_gpt":0.3198275394416241,"score_spread":0.30196556169720273,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390495711","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0020927524,0.008228973,0.0013879944,0.581094,0.29431558,0.0001786425,0.0013270703,0.000547557,0.11082745],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.026620748,0.003957864,0.0018357883,0.27966568,0.06396196,0.00027756146,0.0004280693,0.00045980138,0.6227925],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99686843,0.0005331663,0.00021942389,0.0005024886,0.0015891329,0.0002874938],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9726116,0.005169317,0.0011583283,0.0012064032,0.016595427,0.003258889],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022187298,0.0009086186,0.001726219,0.0010923024,0.0033405344,0.004669934,0.002502455,0.005760932,0.06846848],"category_scores_gemma":[0.046941992,0.00048206837,0.0008562849,0.00078182446,0.0013786952,0.002769024,0.0038465285,0.014401552,0.04045555],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020266465,0.0000067589904,0.00019194538,0.000044869696,0.0000054320635,0.00029745162,0.0002088276,0.000025072755,0.00025565893,0.0022622314,0.9897328,0.00694858],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000057077577,0.0000072534967,0.00072267203,0.00008606478,0.0000042002443,0.00042343867,0.0004759244,0.00009859982,0.000088089364,0.0011189901,0.99695337,0.00001552413],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014006419,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03625767,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93153155,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022850882,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0042598043,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22904986},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390564651","doi":"10.1017/9781009235402.004","title":"Settling In","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Agrarian society; Colonization; Colonialism; Navy; League; Political science; Economic history; Ancient history; Geography; Law; History; Agriculture; Archaeology","score_opus":0.028043117033571756,"score_gpt":0.24332037924914923,"score_spread":0.21527726221557747,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390564651","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0016142688,0.0009861203,0.0019678397,0.009257725,0.003760128,0.00009317404,0.00033149865,0.00031778438,0.9816715],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.015031612,0.00059464754,0.0007524939,0.0054661757,0.00054785213,0.00008896016,0.00043243545,0.00027478856,0.97681093],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99729615,0.0005167441,0.00012742246,0.00073105644,0.00074192765,0.0005866047],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99817026,0.00024516106,0.00012086039,0.00042960473,0.0005797748,0.00045435794],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018149888,0.0008152972,0.00067582,0.0011402261,0.00804221,0.0077253366,0.0015354764,0.0037029772,0.43846148],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006246425,0.0003236984,0.00078250834,0.0011890801,0.0023284303,0.005938856,0.007837302,0.0046165828,0.22281718],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004680498,0.000059532336,0.0007672057,0.00009912962,0.000008477336,0.0003332995,0.003598663,0.000047717203,0.00037879258,0.32294747,0.5823287,0.08938412],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000018613374,0.0000059003537,0.00012412241,0.00004130619,0.0000012638006,0.000041992615,0.0005814148,0.000010731993,0.00004899247,0.0033738383,0.9957657,0.0000028591244],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0052277306,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009247698,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.43846148,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025471542,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034325342,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8009665},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390616247","doi":"10.1139/dsa-2023-0074","title":"Note of appreciation","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Drone Systems and Applications","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology","score_opus":0.014201588750859933,"score_gpt":0.3154328569895113,"score_spread":0.3012312682386514,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390616247","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0021664419,0.0075934147,0.001555129,0.5113701,0.3587993,0.00020424207,0.0017064714,0.00063257484,0.115972295],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.025523713,0.0035777087,0.0017007889,0.2491422,0.06880859,0.00029676702,0.000524045,0.0004114071,0.6500148],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99672806,0.00048735633,0.00021501374,0.0004657932,0.0017867126,0.00031702965],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96874756,0.0048872144,0.001196581,0.00119752,0.020253675,0.003717495],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022013152,0.0008221356,0.0013444979,0.00093291857,0.0027588133,0.0045665535,0.0020933342,0.004786632,0.071839534],"category_scores_gemma":[0.051166136,0.00039440545,0.0008775197,0.00065710454,0.0011523064,0.0021275715,0.003125462,0.012144469,0.044912875],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018386427,0.0000063716,0.00019363596,0.00003728793,0.000004893463,0.00023986654,0.00013778068,0.000029131294,0.00021783746,0.0019791964,0.9891657,0.007969972],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000060340317,0.000008661902,0.0007788215,0.000087052336,0.0000044948415,0.0004395384,0.00036576972,0.000113062444,0.00009908136,0.00096106017,0.99712026,0.00001628962],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015133797,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.033886388,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9281605,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024175385,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005082556,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24032718},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390718940","doi":"10.1017/9781805431817.035","title":"Persons entitled to be summoned to a convocation","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology","score_opus":0.03932092501704992,"score_gpt":0.35786208445658513,"score_spread":0.3185411594395352,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390718940","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002932748,0.0027139331,0.0009783129,0.07159796,0.053519648,0.0004885315,0.0006574637,0.0004884115,0.86662287],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.006305799,0.00063925993,0.0001588154,0.01715947,0.0012891818,0.0001202499,0.00020956899,0.000119326956,0.9739983],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99663216,0.0005345788,0.000104671686,0.0003237981,0.0007621345,0.0016426912],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953654,0.00023903794,0.00015060313,0.00022481056,0.0016768683,0.002343345],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019620573,0.001044882,0.00065096264,0.0010020178,0.019770425,0.006055145,0.0024625536,0.0063824723,0.4319173],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010944887,0.0006163268,0.0009406449,0.0006055035,0.0017420921,0.0038786966,0.009230981,0.011339192,0.21710363],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008889345,0.000012220111,0.00010847362,0.000019304302,0.0000013030136,0.00021604715,0.00048738078,0.000006585984,0.00005448563,0.0039396593,0.98832524,0.0068203895],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000040567425,0.000010310783,0.00034592423,0.000103499886,0.0000020915588,0.00013041816,0.0034151901,0.000009432273,0.00003599136,0.00053769693,0.9953982,0.0000072434323],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.032738928,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07463585,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4319173,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029943362,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.013595944,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.810301},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390877498","doi":"10.1139/tcsme-2023-0139","title":"Note of appreciation","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Transactions of the Canadian Society for Mechanical Engineering","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Calculus (dental)","score_opus":0.012972967191125446,"score_gpt":0.2549250029702599,"score_spread":0.24195203577913443,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390877498","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0013720925,0.008885028,0.0008959932,0.49972042,0.40824243,0.0001295117,0.0009289994,0.00032537445,0.079500124],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.020256294,0.0052172295,0.0012073056,0.30446905,0.10895317,0.00024001392,0.00038308132,0.00032669655,0.5589472],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966097,0.0004803218,0.00025271453,0.0005078534,0.0017915779,0.00035786905],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.977545,0.0036532762,0.00085072994,0.0008381215,0.014274933,0.0028378537],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022249657,0.00094140664,0.0013885028,0.0009908939,0.0033713565,0.0044510304,0.0021222744,0.0056580007,0.048618298],"category_scores_gemma":[0.043440316,0.00042881037,0.0008955201,0.00068684656,0.0014573976,0.0023081496,0.0031353484,0.013823874,0.032879584],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013177212,0.000004194614,0.00012915621,0.000032636846,0.0000041800386,0.00021392085,0.00010915863,0.000017562654,0.0001297654,0.001704837,0.991918,0.0057234564],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004228206,0.0000064615733,0.0005377937,0.00008214021,0.0000038096498,0.0004052423,0.00027318622,0.000060777238,0.0000667221,0.0008463039,0.9976993,0.000013885626],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017795445,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.043980118,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.048618298,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025181894,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0056539373,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16264439},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390893816","doi":"10.1017/9781108566230.001","title":"Table of Cases","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Table (database); Computer science; Information retrieval; Database","score_opus":0.03711431031105409,"score_gpt":0.3329521909904064,"score_spread":0.2958378806793523,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390893816","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0069677522,0.013331561,0.0028179716,0.0066582253,0.0022070785,0.0017931277,0.41191432,0.0008433497,0.5534665],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.11862103,0.047556568,0.0067520146,0.011347336,0.0022925101,0.00482945,0.50821906,0.0012488964,0.29913312],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981152,0.00028071692,0.00035389964,0.0003232727,0.00067024236,0.00025670862],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996191,0.001136126,0.0006996779,0.00022961704,0.0013844967,0.00035907427],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00071719376,0.0007480262,0.0008085041,0.009432845,0.0012793014,0.0018031689,0.0013013472,0.00088708237,0.36348552],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0111761335,0.0003918169,0.000743485,0.0060585444,0.0003466412,0.0014483401,0.0008103035,0.00084905146,0.07824256],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000091629,0.000032229564,0.0034857758,0.0008728342,0.00003052662,0.00082029676,0.00010982401,0.00012627883,0.00011374294,0.005162241,0.9506246,0.03852994],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000066435365,0.0000497206,0.015658194,0.004036416,0.00007564802,0.00449798,0.0007821122,0.00011580059,0.000244609,0.0063302717,0.9681106,0.000032132353],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.011256464,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011838179,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.36348552,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021502238,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002604675,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.90791065},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4390925355","doi":"10.1515/9780776627922-004","title":"CHAPTER IV Legal Cases Around the World","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of Ottawa Press eBooks","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"History; Political science","score_opus":0.0371662392765481,"score_gpt":0.24774947977110418,"score_spread":0.21058324049455607,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4390925355","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.001551937,0.080874585,0.00056576927,0.012390136,0.0030563008,0.000051826653,0.00016176172,0.000060434475,0.9012874],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.05465684,0.14266576,0.0018043837,0.023105917,0.004304545,0.00014205792,0.000814933,0.00017501441,0.77233064],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992337,0.00016438635,0.00004574388,0.00007334627,0.0003668006,0.00011602603],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99898237,0.0005312764,0.00012432129,0.00007004708,0.0002003858,0.000091511385],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005816682,0.00055966823,0.00022912365,0.004051374,0.002953587,0.0052648615,0.00072104414,0.002394445,0.04690517],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002523572,0.0002983203,0.00040168394,0.0032357248,0.002534558,0.0037532805,0.0023567427,0.0028051788,0.0099993665],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004010558,0.00003350478,0.00036029523,0.00033616918,0.0000030940657,0.00051295914,0.0026782516,0.00016299436,0.00014959044,0.18282424,0.7170622,0.095872715],"study_design_scores_gemma":[9.496752e-7,0.0000030605238,0.00027413384,0.0010806017,0.000001673734,0.0005365911,0.0009161765,0.000023617991,0.00005893525,0.0096921995,0.9874073,0.0000047447093],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007995419,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012745733,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04690517,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002885461,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030663526,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1569134},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391161308","doi":"10.5040/9781509970131","title":"Private International Law in East Asia","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Hart Publishing eBooks","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique; York University; National Research Centre","keywords":"East Asia; Political science; Law; Geography; China","score_opus":0.030704746449904473,"score_gpt":0.2849421706320657,"score_spread":0.2542374241821613,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391161308","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011833173,0.03153843,0.0008803745,0.0142027335,0.0009426098,0.000015181652,0.00009583577,0.000053166994,0.9404384],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.30569476,0.047213152,0.0014231827,0.009434097,0.0012946621,0.00008036766,0.00023099578,0.00012500824,0.63450384],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99948645,0.00013861283,0.00003535461,0.000050019917,0.00017447598,0.000115071656],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99947447,0.00018615315,0.00007222895,0.000083433886,0.00009505505,0.00008871325],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007262771,0.00029519427,0.00019966972,0.0007148958,0.0019802556,0.0068347445,0.00043962244,0.001238795,0.018051557],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0014728458,0.00017402934,0.00019073639,0.0017023457,0.0026769317,0.0053692493,0.0025893014,0.0022997425,0.002367296],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006345675,0.00001909917,0.00046264098,0.00012911769,0.0000028058478,0.00020755308,0.010386303,0.00013426525,0.00013432647,0.89626956,0.06474901,0.027498895],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000032537662,0.000008488139,0.0013465957,0.0003941551,0.0000036797849,0.00020728543,0.004802779,0.00012571776,0.00012139575,0.036642104,0.9563395,0.000005047314],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0043513672,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0058997064,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018051557,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002636038,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029803992,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.060388505},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391378650","doi":"10.1139/as-2023-0048","title":"Note of appreciation","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Arctic Science","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Geology","score_opus":0.01947327005408917,"score_gpt":0.35673500420651344,"score_spread":0.3372617341524243,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391378650","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0006576642,0.0048218057,0.0015016844,0.44367915,0.53934664,0.00009563479,0.0005860159,0.0008019959,0.008509419],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.016903,0.006024465,0.0034720532,0.42285663,0.45580912,0.00038849993,0.00056926836,0.0014157048,0.09256117],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.97803694,0.0035381126,0.0019891616,0.0035454861,0.011780191,0.0011100839],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7179882,0.0327244,0.0081173405,0.0062632933,0.21675652,0.018150223],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008804144,0.0018500974,0.0034722725,0.0018039752,0.0033531953,0.009024291,0.004064071,0.008356304,0.026782168],"category_scores_gemma":[0.18344222,0.00074210466,0.0018546309,0.001370602,0.0036659911,0.0059716795,0.004067261,0.025070043,0.03832496],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028179229,0.000008624542,0.00016839984,0.0000910568,0.0000112513235,0.00033441046,0.0001250141,0.000026638678,0.00020730867,0.00065851054,0.99367964,0.004660872],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021161122,0.000028845181,0.00090293575,0.0002454629,0.000014710887,0.00167365,0.00033747015,0.00026249027,0.00030852522,0.0024213248,0.99370277,0.00008080117],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0057232496,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010672394,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.026782168,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035042728,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009309863,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08959526},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391436236","doi":"10.1139/bcb-2023-0272","title":"Note of appreciation","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biochemistry and Cell Biology","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Chemistry; Biology; Psychology","score_opus":0.010047788432344856,"score_gpt":0.28404442817065984,"score_spread":0.273996639738315,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391436236","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0013698485,0.0062065693,0.0010490936,0.6114068,0.33450598,0.00010404921,0.00062667596,0.00035660024,0.04437427],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.02322467,0.003813688,0.0018011286,0.47722414,0.09738116,0.00027337574,0.00029194233,0.00042722418,0.39556268],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9955924,0.00069547695,0.00031204362,0.000709331,0.0022222803,0.0004685263],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96749973,0.006157771,0.001347043,0.0014047244,0.018095434,0.005495238],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030389891,0.00092132343,0.0017400515,0.0009088083,0.003485749,0.005279906,0.002542839,0.007129069,0.043738652],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06531123,0.00045892075,0.0010706354,0.00056992174,0.0017751008,0.002572348,0.0039814757,0.020267151,0.030652445],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020135862,0.000006200156,0.00018222445,0.00003605047,0.000006814054,0.00035443038,0.00018990679,0.000023570816,0.00021799536,0.0023756763,0.9908036,0.0057832696],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008126534,0.000009243792,0.00057955366,0.00010613763,0.0000061101578,0.00075027865,0.0004581299,0.00010255865,0.00010137928,0.0015559692,0.99630105,0.000021487971],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010915431,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.026941298,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.043738652,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002534969,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006319228,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1463204},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391445570","doi":"10.1177/2753412x231222587","title":"Consensus and Compulsion: The Extra-territorial Effect of Chinese Judicial and Specially-Invited Mediation in Common Law Countries","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Chinese Journal of Transnational Law","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mediation; Law; Political science; Common law; Psychology; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.006553439253355836,"score_gpt":0.29651403873488674,"score_spread":0.2899605994815309,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391445570","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.87732416,0.0007890286,0.0016308329,0.0041562296,0.00007096389,0.000096432406,0.000045156547,0.000023659966,0.11586347],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9982723,0.00010081782,0.00011926612,0.00024181824,0.000010714794,0.000017236105,0.000010825993,0.0000033133965,0.0012237484],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9811473,0.0068998886,0.0009256801,0.0023658965,0.0047435197,0.0039178217],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9691094,0.015010224,0.006224161,0.0028911405,0.004519217,0.0022459768],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.017317014,0.0002698136,0.0009006265,0.0024817877,0.0066564246,0.0048325574,0.0021096538,0.0017775199,0.008018329],"category_scores_gemma":[0.052406177,0.00028602415,0.0007610364,0.003141602,0.0118345255,0.0041056653,0.008885147,0.00266319,0.00027365956],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003386585,0.00017173101,0.23722352,0.00037493586,0.00040636185,0.0039510713,0.107363276,0.0035902355,0.0009871708,0.57773775,0.00493288,0.06292234],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003439857,0.0005336135,0.6021283,0.0009093673,0.0010802372,0.0011524854,0.18222746,0.008959928,0.0020824529,0.15005252,0.05022929,0.00030035607],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07003823,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07805038,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07003823,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0066878125,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014203726,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13926113},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391483123","doi":"10.1002/iir.1530","title":"<i>Re Simplicity &amp; Vogue Retailing (HK) Co Ltd</i> [2023] <scp>HKCFI</scp> 1443 (<scp>HCCW</scp> 457/2022, 30 May 2023) (coram Linda Chan J) [case comment]","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Insolvency Review","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Chemistry; Advertising; Business","score_opus":0.06577311175620933,"score_gpt":0.3824403934068162,"score_spread":0.31666728165060687,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391483123","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0069182147,0.011961967,0.0008317794,0.27590886,0.008489184,0.00021448178,0.00055387954,0.00016696884,0.69495463],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.08685605,0.007541365,0.00063793926,0.3129958,0.0024470843,0.00024391696,0.000432693,0.000118806944,0.5887264],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969637,0.0004748193,0.00023477882,0.00036683428,0.0011114059,0.0008485252],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9961343,0.0015594498,0.00035819897,0.00018520681,0.0014362324,0.0003267176],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028288593,0.00047373172,0.0003343417,0.00084776897,0.006430585,0.005941489,0.0020463343,0.013481645,0.025823541],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008584873,0.00047223934,0.0005811332,0.0011806559,0.0031558478,0.0029234206,0.0016507644,0.009906432,0.00970169],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011543516,0.000013510675,0.00092708814,0.00014485794,0.0000071349596,0.001136737,0.0012423161,0.00006917759,0.00025581816,0.09223235,0.8968047,0.007154752],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006234974,0.000011966623,0.0026586666,0.00030652192,0.0000097659695,0.00034097378,0.0010846842,0.00007127218,0.00027123492,0.0018335423,0.9933761,0.000029012983],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.19797723,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.30553055,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19797723,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0072344486,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014456805,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.39364976},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391633959","doi":"10.29053/2523-1367/2023/v7a17","title":"Les limitations de l’accès à internet en Afrique à l’aune de la Communication 742/20, African Freedom of Expression Exchange et 15 autres (représenté par FOI Attorneys) c. Algérie et 27 autres","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"African Human Rights Yearbook / Annuaire Africain des Droits de l’Homme","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Freedom of expression; Humanities; Philosophy; Political science; Human rights","score_opus":0.0360023532497368,"score_gpt":0.3225714502278518,"score_spread":0.28656909697811495,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391633959","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.39159614,0.02460715,0.0023933544,0.062415637,0.0008062099,0.00010512668,0.0003242728,0.000035038767,0.51771706],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9081632,0.006979316,0.0015616431,0.0027893751,0.00033759777,0.000096135154,0.00007132197,0.000021683354,0.07997973],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99453676,0.0022349274,0.0003162699,0.00037587635,0.0013087637,0.0012273827],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99532914,0.0030842694,0.00054436305,0.0002503326,0.0006237921,0.0001681654],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004474969,0.00028605116,0.00018777647,0.001067621,0.0032954484,0.006280029,0.00035566895,0.0031430807,0.008491239],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009423835,0.00030606767,0.00023776447,0.001111941,0.0037578675,0.0037136127,0.0019257803,0.0021965452,0.00082101533],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00026269592,0.000100159246,0.0151262535,0.00036647127,0.000028838927,0.0014786993,0.064675264,0.00050856377,0.0033961514,0.7476428,0.035478193,0.13093582],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003688162,0.00007345608,0.031821903,0.0006226784,0.000027694487,0.0009913621,0.023621567,0.00042611733,0.0039339294,0.022301443,0.9160767,0.00006629625],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.022358127,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018099373,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.022358127,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0028171488,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0035615966,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.044455945},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391796572","doi":"10.7202/1100104ar","title":"P. DAILLIER, A. PELLET, DROIT INTERNATIONAL PUBLIC, (NGUYEN QUOC DINH), 7ÈME ÉD., PARIS, L.G.D.J., 2002, 1510 p.","year":2023,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue québécoise de droit international","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Pellet; Titer; Political science; Virology; Medicine; Materials science; Composite material","score_opus":0.023804142165996453,"score_gpt":0.28365308121559774,"score_spread":0.25984893904960127,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391796572","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00037287947,0.8831586,0.0011377009,0.03299813,0.0070802933,0.000038291942,0.0012176218,0.0001554788,0.07384099],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.012236521,0.713122,0.0022733936,0.012914996,0.0049712434,0.000118561285,0.0013084399,0.00035737932,0.2526974],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992029,0.0001482678,0.00008338911,0.00010251228,0.000381286,0.00008162903],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989901,0.00040632614,0.00015026078,0.00003853275,0.00031987802,0.00009484224],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00097628246,0.0026211317,0.00081506534,0.005802763,0.0038384649,0.0051838225,0.0017697125,0.0045964853,0.05142512],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002486162,0.0010725944,0.00073460717,0.008938318,0.0024269903,0.0067263274,0.001364705,0.00423992,0.027277136],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019164318,0.000009717636,0.00023069263,0.00037041135,0.000010420184,0.00008030817,0.0007472296,0.00006369637,0.0001026502,0.007646284,0.947039,0.043680474],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000053674926,0.0000065492886,0.0017930102,0.0006871334,0.00000719084,0.0001786766,0.00087177113,0.00005470641,0.00012854872,0.0029817203,0.99326634,0.00001887423],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.28740275,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5176592,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.28740275,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008103709,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004500633,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5714598},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391796622","doi":"10.7202/1100715ar","title":"Gérald Goldstein et Ethel Groffier, Traité de droit civil : Droit international privé, Tome I, Théorie générale, Cowansville (Qc.), Yvon Blais, 1998","year":2023,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue québécoise de droit international","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Combinatorics; Philosophy; Mathematics","score_opus":0.01716330493011127,"score_gpt":0.28247964868275144,"score_spread":0.2653163437526402,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391796622","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0024818126,0.48658174,0.0022181002,0.36462533,0.0024340304,0.00004633904,0.0004203863,0.00006307527,0.14112908],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1754093,0.50216573,0.004174239,0.10617557,0.003389009,0.00031794282,0.0004949976,0.00026054456,0.2076127],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9982315,0.00057176594,0.00007565532,0.0002599066,0.00062161754,0.00023951348],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970542,0.0017698031,0.0002343686,0.000095406496,0.0006523913,0.00019372242],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025586013,0.001328689,0.0007300033,0.0025392047,0.0076195914,0.006109199,0.0021546674,0.009603686,0.021738652],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0061798207,0.0009493243,0.00046191944,0.005427363,0.010540961,0.009455269,0.0021160266,0.007646912,0.004393179],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027284363,0.000039114628,0.00076661963,0.00022021007,0.000015465363,0.00012971163,0.0057014665,0.00020410035,0.00007900543,0.37393486,0.59994334,0.01893893],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000047522277,0.000015556794,0.005389671,0.0011918286,0.000028537346,0.00015627747,0.007415491,0.00013956563,0.0002460445,0.16845177,0.8168533,0.000064378255],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.37149507,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.48976526,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.37149507,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015598049,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011145044,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.73866546},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391796633","doi":"10.7202/1100712ar","title":"Paul-André Crépeau et Élise M. Charpentier, Les Principes d’UNIDROIT et le Code civil du Québec : valeurs partagées ?, Scarborough (Ont.), Carswell, 1998","year":2023,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue québécoise de droit international","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Art","score_opus":0.02707822753473357,"score_gpt":0.28580971626366053,"score_spread":0.258731488728927,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391796633","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0039008774,0.49237096,0.0015543078,0.3452691,0.0065320237,0.000093187824,0.0012662895,0.0000882883,0.14892493],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.12324579,0.36439905,0.0028304954,0.071640134,0.0028172925,0.00023211562,0.0008960571,0.00023392054,0.4337052],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99813616,0.00035329096,0.00007833884,0.00020694721,0.00087650574,0.0003487673],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99617994,0.0010800046,0.00026193805,0.000077992794,0.002047949,0.0003521479],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018547394,0.0010794089,0.00049080595,0.0020871796,0.011377972,0.0072193784,0.001880182,0.0056543,0.025295405],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0054270695,0.00069768296,0.00034996567,0.004849879,0.0046515586,0.005137042,0.0017047583,0.0060385712,0.0039196257],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002383247,0.0000197055,0.0013672173,0.00020013974,0.0000087775825,0.00013546487,0.005293108,0.00009052729,0.00009396128,0.04030569,0.9301304,0.022331115],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011174356,0.000008815625,0.010752604,0.00054646184,0.000012249162,0.00009875654,0.0065544443,0.00007688241,0.0001907753,0.0049402765,0.976766,0.000041406223],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9451942,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9770922,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.054805815,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03176284,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0353519,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23045659},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391796724","doi":"10.7202/1100336ar","title":"Nabil N. Antaki. Le règlement amiable des litiges, Cowansville (Qc.), Yvon Blais, 1998","year":2023,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue québécoise de droit international","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Art","score_opus":0.02422173144455293,"score_gpt":0.28517295560757444,"score_spread":0.2609512241630215,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391796724","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0024470298,0.34886,0.0005908508,0.25299993,0.008318897,0.00012565586,0.0024206843,0.00014982735,0.38408718],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.045757644,0.11240468,0.00094093534,0.040235143,0.0016214495,0.00021799623,0.00092169293,0.00015756297,0.79774296],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9980749,0.00019542918,0.00010245731,0.00022811105,0.0009785094,0.00042061487],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966517,0.00065015076,0.00028152697,0.00006703388,0.0019928277,0.0003567125],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016032441,0.001085179,0.0004903259,0.0017013208,0.012267363,0.005854311,0.002131592,0.0068119536,0.061604075],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0047253584,0.00073844084,0.00037432677,0.0025466222,0.0019929202,0.003966548,0.0017896089,0.008584642,0.014685655],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014490781,0.000011927625,0.00036752748,0.000102446465,0.0000022550228,0.00007650557,0.0005902897,0.000033453034,0.000080002,0.017144646,0.9649846,0.016591888],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000125285305,0.0000062782815,0.0038833814,0.00033670856,0.00000685634,0.000052402527,0.0009311284,0.00003985863,0.00012143538,0.0016581343,0.9929282,0.000022969467],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8496402,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9299907,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8496402,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02070343,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.028559959,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3024906},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391796729","doi":"10.7202/1100397ar","title":"CONFÉRENCE INAUGURALE","year":2023,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue québécoise de droit international","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.02541870969521281,"score_gpt":0.29801414766917916,"score_spread":0.27259543797396635,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391796729","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0018106151,0.11474087,0.0016356624,0.06474728,0.25509992,0.0005341669,0.0070678443,0.0010182312,0.55334544],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.007220308,0.010842594,0.00059557805,0.007027453,0.012660136,0.00032897154,0.002507012,0.00036703906,0.95845085],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957224,0.00063026784,0.00023098086,0.00054704776,0.0017568637,0.0011124054],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9902048,0.00038034518,0.0003131876,0.0004779523,0.0068014828,0.001822324],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003804995,0.001700422,0.0010980357,0.0037281886,0.0049718535,0.0074265376,0.0025272113,0.004250823,0.3413831],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009569378,0.0005408499,0.00095636136,0.0023949791,0.0011871397,0.0029798483,0.0045628855,0.0042826734,0.14669406],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000042230968,0.000015378677,0.0001266618,0.00015565114,0.0000033836222,0.000051665647,0.00006676505,0.000020168158,0.00016799738,0.0028883463,0.97361577,0.02284608],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000033189535,0.0000061948404,0.00034065192,0.00007773314,0.0000012055857,0.000026587064,0.0000478495,0.000012150026,0.000041784064,0.00015473047,0.99928397,0.0000037262723],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.079509504,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1158637,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3413831,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00716578,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0136766005,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9394371},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391796776","doi":"10.7202/1100340ar","title":"La pratique judiciaire du droit international privé au Québec en 1999","year":2023,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue québécoise de droit international","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.012121512505041772,"score_gpt":0.27703721670350256,"score_spread":0.2649157041984608,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391796776","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1597491,0.10161734,0.00414827,0.19503923,0.0037694464,0.00019549548,0.0034521818,0.00018633417,0.53184265],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5291326,0.014042003,0.0015314323,0.01605859,0.0003064264,0.00009736023,0.00065125234,0.000054851538,0.43812552],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979371,0.00022303696,0.000060975435,0.00020566105,0.0009020377,0.0006711979],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975223,0.00044272837,0.00016904766,0.0000643393,0.0013892911,0.00041224124],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014466777,0.00032201502,0.00027673168,0.00089348137,0.007816015,0.0047626006,0.0008623514,0.002673231,0.008717428],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004964176,0.0002545369,0.00023664045,0.001865869,0.002601496,0.0012595538,0.0009763528,0.0041846535,0.0005038924],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010699294,0.00006637599,0.018135436,0.00019481129,0.00004421413,0.0009770071,0.01712308,0.0013082598,0.00092259154,0.4394334,0.43866044,0.08302733],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002026484,0.000022844228,0.032790963,0.0002428204,0.000020960902,0.00014833153,0.0038915752,0.00055508566,0.00049219717,0.0026623437,0.95910263,0.000049995026],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99355376,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9956377,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08876223,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08876223,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0900402,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.64401805},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391796911","doi":"10.7202/1100905ar","title":"La pratique judiciaire du droit international privé au Québec en 1993-1994","year":2023,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue québécoise de droit international","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.012439749400341692,"score_gpt":0.27841298944922455,"score_spread":0.26597324004888284,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391796911","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.34624305,0.06422846,0.003742579,0.14194895,0.0019183195,0.00022325378,0.0038290375,0.00013792352,0.4377284],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.72318166,0.008176641,0.0011953413,0.007328054,0.00012974236,0.00009021691,0.00060444255,0.00004050082,0.2592534],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977939,0.00025412044,0.00005734559,0.00019719027,0.0008621394,0.0008353739],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99611485,0.0006910365,0.000287368,0.00007448496,0.0020824573,0.00074981764],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018905982,0.00024287806,0.0002608424,0.0009543616,0.008312154,0.0039812224,0.00092114566,0.0020346397,0.008015497],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0068859463,0.00024259965,0.00018923738,0.002160665,0.0025583738,0.001189659,0.0010462477,0.0038625891,0.00042205642],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022215387,0.000116100695,0.05602657,0.00028650017,0.00006941157,0.0012380555,0.039349075,0.0019776819,0.0012985189,0.39805588,0.39272404,0.108636014],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000035745114,0.000043956425,0.12124743,0.0003631077,0.000036853664,0.00019892999,0.012432184,0.0010297489,0.0008193332,0.002569505,0.86114246,0.00008071012],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9948637,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9973443,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10862269,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10862269,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.103720985,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.78811646},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391796926","doi":"10.7202/1101225ar","title":"La négociation et la mise en oeuvre des conventions de droit international privé : perspectives canadiennes et québécoises","year":2023,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue québécoise de droit international","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Wildlife Federation","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Philosophy; Humanities","score_opus":0.017699024686863428,"score_gpt":0.30730472235818485,"score_spread":0.28960569767132144,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391796926","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.22948715,0.069731526,0.0022660003,0.3223642,0.0012225473,0.000047789035,0.0002734237,0.00003085492,0.37457645],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9255712,0.012901437,0.00051497336,0.013461471,0.00013439651,0.00004211683,0.000048355112,0.000023422015,0.04730268],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99643975,0.0013396872,0.00006274142,0.00021018759,0.0007238092,0.0012239222],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958294,0.0016491411,0.00040325816,0.00012684362,0.0012175194,0.0007738186],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039315512,0.00039062955,0.0004311302,0.0015400597,0.019172631,0.011777044,0.0014378978,0.004971811,0.006814796],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0067203026,0.000247268,0.0003010368,0.0033908356,0.025625598,0.004315913,0.003374548,0.0054516657,0.0002396078],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003783497,0.000033848646,0.006907771,0.00013926867,0.000022866647,0.0006900591,0.14176156,0.0003824857,0.00034641993,0.7863573,0.042165898,0.021154774],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023057086,0.000038165457,0.02583864,0.0008032735,0.00003790484,0.00024500935,0.21307215,0.0004383452,0.0003690235,0.039189406,0.71981746,0.00012762967],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9681826,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98085403,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07438487,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07438487,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.057985537,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.53970253},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391796936","doi":"10.7202/1101425ar","title":"Turp, D. et G. A. Beaudouin (dir.), Perspectives canadiennes et européennes des droits de la personne, Actes des Journées strasbourgeoises de l’institut canadien d’études juridiques supérieures 1984, Cowansville (Qué.), Les Éditions Yvon Blais Inc., 1986, 722 p. (40,00$ CAN)","year":2023,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue québécoise de droit international","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Humanities; Political science; Philosophy","score_opus":0.017598337688037567,"score_gpt":0.288174862413007,"score_spread":0.2705765247249694,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391796936","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00052084844,0.79250705,0.00044522432,0.14688326,0.012165206,0.000049335584,0.00065207155,0.00006878226,0.046708174],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.014369543,0.656391,0.0008221449,0.04075799,0.006893274,0.0002237324,0.00062901876,0.00020474115,0.27970865],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979273,0.00050613424,0.00013437288,0.00020376203,0.0009430535,0.0002853532],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967546,0.0012299849,0.00033532263,0.000051138664,0.0012401078,0.00038886385],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023663796,0.0019993456,0.0009125059,0.0029044377,0.007877948,0.0068152156,0.002283872,0.006884247,0.045701455],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0039725243,0.0013299463,0.00073560583,0.007330533,0.0030043041,0.00607021,0.0018529878,0.0067030312,0.022930546],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011535092,0.0000059233566,0.00018016029,0.0001360095,0.0000039923752,0.00003412563,0.00048337653,0.000031407886,0.00002472518,0.0030126937,0.98391414,0.01216198],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014488603,0.000011131099,0.005241031,0.00069474796,0.000013886487,0.00009350938,0.0022767137,0.000045686014,0.00007932088,0.0020375482,0.9894671,0.000024793968],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.60485935,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.78886163,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.39514065,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0159135,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014850487,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7949354},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391796941","doi":"10.7202/1101342ar","title":"CHRONIQUE DE JURISPRUDENCE","year":2023,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue québécoise de droit international","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Political science; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.020654002210930583,"score_gpt":0.3074305793459025,"score_spread":0.28677657713497196,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391796941","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0019820293,0.3288184,0.006335907,0.07877462,0.026977027,0.00024252887,0.0013925198,0.00030715886,0.5551699],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.12984037,0.32552356,0.01810955,0.03933444,0.017594963,0.0008998188,0.002382136,0.0009840279,0.46533114],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98946244,0.0028794156,0.0006478234,0.0011943073,0.004680776,0.0011353467],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98656565,0.0036695455,0.00069976086,0.0008504576,0.0072064186,0.0010081574],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0057802303,0.0011585878,0.0011014689,0.010762846,0.010854452,0.016765937,0.0018414959,0.003798102,0.025686862],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012944687,0.000922631,0.00048872444,0.0128294425,0.018639326,0.009438197,0.0032742743,0.012641949,0.005482807],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028622053,0.000016829536,0.00034694557,0.00050249154,0.000007928071,0.00026968954,0.0064331214,0.0001261273,0.00032667076,0.6458809,0.2905254,0.055535235],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002487467,0.000003320248,0.00041952322,0.00022278703,7.49113e-7,0.00009728891,0.0005840049,0.00001996988,0.00003158605,0.006784668,0.9918262,0.0000074153636],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3867116,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.42522424,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97431314,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.043378163,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.039532322,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7689214},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391796955","doi":"10.7202/1101429ar","title":"CHRONIQUE DE JURISPRUDENCE","year":2023,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue québécoise de droit international","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Philosophy; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.020654002210930583,"score_gpt":0.3074305793459025,"score_spread":0.28677657713497196,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391796955","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0020138412,0.32889214,0.006498667,0.07997605,0.026678165,0.00024474706,0.0014273118,0.0003073586,0.55396175],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.13282597,0.32081658,0.018088864,0.038951498,0.017202662,0.0008907442,0.0023538398,0.00097613886,0.46789366],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98935306,0.0029509803,0.0006410857,0.0012122967,0.0047106547,0.0011318711],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9866658,0.0036512446,0.0006870932,0.00085045386,0.0071628955,0.0009824826],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0058055837,0.001169747,0.0011080232,0.010665892,0.010969541,0.016711809,0.0018570086,0.0038072818,0.02524953],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0129331825,0.0009256446,0.00048975536,0.01277823,0.019143397,0.009363641,0.0032485703,0.012623795,0.005323452],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002801163,0.000016523916,0.0003367744,0.000488371,0.000007839378,0.00025766017,0.0063566696,0.0001270213,0.0003220361,0.65333176,0.28535715,0.053370193],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000025266077,0.000003336961,0.00042161625,0.0002208453,7.656456e-7,0.000095112184,0.0005857653,0.000020704798,0.000032516054,0.006903315,0.991706,0.0000075197786],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.40792075,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.44460854,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.97475046,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.045194425,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04072955,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.81109273},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4391869603","doi":"10.51644/9780889205666-009","title":"5 Narine-Singh v. Attorney General of Canada","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.01535839148972607,"score_gpt":0.24022172452039653,"score_spread":0.22486333303067046,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4391869603","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.003974947,0.012291679,0.0006178667,0.028663967,0.0009712716,0.000093034534,0.0014885071,0.00012263448,0.9517761],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.043501094,0.0032668817,0.00049597624,0.024412714,0.000111821464,0.00005551895,0.00028465432,0.00005318588,0.9278181],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99771464,0.00016612478,0.000037540813,0.00015438614,0.0008653735,0.0010618402],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987116,0.00020166945,0.000030481235,0.000033312368,0.00085865246,0.00016430985],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001127122,0.0008703492,0.00053061877,0.0015503472,0.017191881,0.004993395,0.0019415535,0.00784297,0.035884984],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0027268312,0.0006244968,0.0006649386,0.001979227,0.0020128828,0.0016855795,0.0014339349,0.0053453445,0.0060035926],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000024385856,0.000027666863,0.0014125133,0.00007545684,0.000008227498,0.00029110702,0.0015727638,0.00016790222,0.00019861052,0.15050709,0.8291971,0.016517159],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000071422737,0.000009052002,0.0031752281,0.00014795882,0.000014214041,0.00008819611,0.0011833907,0.00016290083,0.00022643042,0.004432684,0.99052596,0.000026792584],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9577987,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99001795,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04220128,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.031002061,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06014636,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22493672},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4392771881","doi":"10.1093/grurint/ikae018","title":"35th Sharing Session – On SEPs – Standing Committee on the Law of Patents, WIPO, Geneva","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"GRUR International","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Session (web analytics); Law; Political science; Business; Engineering; Advertising","score_opus":0.06926275575575312,"score_gpt":0.3552564782010414,"score_spread":0.28599372244528826,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4392771881","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00587189,0.025811478,0.007657417,0.20740308,0.12613997,0.0029227617,0.011235252,0.0010729822,0.6118852],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.020458473,0.005248773,0.0025431234,0.027096057,0.019655224,0.0016142761,0.0040811696,0.00086367835,0.9184393],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9925485,0.0015836573,0.00045062488,0.0008003004,0.0028295638,0.0017874911],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9929053,0.0018874374,0.00034678573,0.0008138891,0.0029294854,0.0011171376],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010466296,0.0015796353,0.0014207629,0.0023844265,0.0056880238,0.00860789,0.003049277,0.019677525,0.1426623],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01192412,0.0007392869,0.0020890546,0.0015221802,0.002867622,0.0044879583,0.005684756,0.00939212,0.052013252],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000055394426,0.000044646207,0.00012903022,0.000149948,0.000008671131,0.00015166086,0.00012625901,0.0001607609,0.00061262294,0.011007466,0.9783245,0.009229135],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010930333,0.000014745898,0.0008051299,0.00021693482,0.0000055078485,0.00003254008,0.00011741155,0.0000878279,0.00027966726,0.0027996092,0.9956118,0.000017836004],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024880935,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.029962681,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1426623,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0067422497,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01666958,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47725296},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4393019965","doi":"10.7202/1105759ar","title":"Wither the Divisional Court? Looking at the Past, Analyzing the Present, and Querying the Future of Ontario’s Intermediary Appellate Court","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ottawa Law Review","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Remand (court procedure); Political science; Court of record; Business; Original jurisdiction; Supreme court","score_opus":0.013631076992749217,"score_gpt":0.2866863568475972,"score_spread":0.27305527985484795,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4393019965","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.053821295,0.03587412,0.0013644582,0.73769385,0.0011498693,0.000085757376,0.0059537324,0.00007165529,0.1639853],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.84838676,0.03491613,0.0037312994,0.05815662,0.0011490252,0.00010406165,0.0024278513,0.00011660878,0.051011667],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9834715,0.0032543754,0.00070088234,0.0017097015,0.0061159604,0.0047475277],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96824014,0.00832296,0.003302591,0.001673468,0.01446366,0.003997168],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015185391,0.000335268,0.0007636881,0.0027021861,0.018610781,0.021408182,0.0029588987,0.0063731414,0.010972247],"category_scores_gemma":[0.044261742,0.0006594015,0.00072095694,0.008662401,0.016064541,0.019296095,0.0031601558,0.0061905696,0.0013719042],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013935064,0.000043635457,0.044033967,0.0005602025,0.00008782702,0.0007735514,0.031776734,0.00063703646,0.00040640793,0.34516913,0.50860745,0.0677647],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004136803,0.000030479698,0.04971244,0.0019343871,0.00018004447,0.00024887756,0.10719609,0.00090739323,0.0004902667,0.08736795,0.7516159,0.0002748507],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97119504,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99112064,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15812474,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.15812474,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.17862691,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.976456},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4393031737","doi":"10.1111/1468-2230.12885","title":"<i>R (on the application of W80)</i> v <i>Director General of the Independent Office of Police Conduct</i>: Landmark Ruling or Business as Usual?","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Modern Law Review","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Nortel (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Landmark; Law; Political science; Director general; Management; Computer science; Economics; Artificial intelligence","score_opus":0.046857292845601334,"score_gpt":0.3459466951516419,"score_spread":0.29908940230604053,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4393031737","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.010353602,0.022419099,0.0017284356,0.49670193,0.018676946,0.0005730395,0.002120178,0.0003463775,0.44708043],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.04310167,0.0066471356,0.0014258258,0.79245913,0.00549946,0.0005320341,0.0005268129,0.00009880584,0.14970908],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.992722,0.0011852889,0.0007749318,0.0009844039,0.0026378466,0.0016956021],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9928275,0.0043386817,0.0005263619,0.00028266944,0.0016389065,0.00038595713],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0071650706,0.0008035746,0.0010057306,0.0019156219,0.0061255354,0.0060938094,0.0033204358,0.02811304,0.012001797],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019876992,0.0011868253,0.0018183222,0.0018872764,0.0057250466,0.003172921,0.002527381,0.01587394,0.011055971],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003587962,0.000029539255,0.00054599915,0.00016956717,0.000018930506,0.00047236448,0.00078645884,0.00007152916,0.00062783284,0.11609056,0.8730095,0.008141875],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005969044,0.00010332278,0.005650286,0.0010554307,0.000046098063,0.00027950495,0.0015533568,0.0001328438,0.00076665496,0.01627471,0.97395116,0.00012699736],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1107417,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.21993376,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1107417,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0071943128,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011866007,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22019422},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4394114213","doi":"10.6084/m9.figshare.23982570","title":"Law","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"dataset","venue":"Figshare","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.08092811840701054,"score_gpt":0.3569291505564001,"score_spread":0.2760010321493896,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4394114213","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"dataset","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"dataset","genre_consensus":"dataset","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00012090144,0.000037861013,0.000031523177,0.00006218703,0.000012557614,0.000008316097,0.99778676,0.00009464077,0.0018451748],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00045180097,0.000053991487,0.00016202104,0.000059857644,0.000004902387,0.00004868467,0.9977984,0.00004189898,0.0013783725],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99840647,0.00020398939,0.00019482111,0.0003572884,0.0005788693,0.00025849167],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.993038,0.002222022,0.0004684167,0.0010953769,0.0026436446,0.0005325801],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011834399,0.0010147111,0.0007952675,0.0048767203,0.0013160564,0.0027265705,0.0020967019,0.0017583576,0.12054158],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011170486,0.0005435857,0.00079619413,0.010161199,0.000431649,0.0012778218,0.0015856866,0.0016216927,0.10312396],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022849621,0.000014194515,0.0011590028,0.00033024664,0.000009616972,0.000018305762,0.000038217306,0.00012159109,0.00004658425,0.0011905875,0.99455416,0.0024945696],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000052117088,0.0000047723925,0.0048878016,0.00025279462,0.000008098504,0.000026328587,0.00011085215,0.00018771681,0.000103699495,0.0007693223,0.9935834,0.00001309045],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.19353616,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.316371,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19353616,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038443308,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007157538,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4394586781","doi":"10.59403/2a43jtb031","title":"Chapter 31: Spain","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"EC and international tax law series.","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Geography","score_opus":0.038975138312135,"score_gpt":0.28634173755810266,"score_spread":0.24736659924596766,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4394586781","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00059211795,0.0123164365,0.0003514587,0.005998989,0.003379467,0.000029876952,0.0005985334,0.00025052097,0.9764825],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.008523075,0.010406199,0.00046276487,0.003817889,0.0009660033,0.000045737084,0.000991983,0.00040268814,0.9743838],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99959177,0.000058175297,0.000018852113,0.00008775986,0.00017179515,0.00007161425],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99978715,0.00003174231,0.000016836686,0.000031963125,0.00009325716,0.00003917799],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00033720877,0.0007592801,0.00061730156,0.0011266737,0.0017687305,0.0095084235,0.0009789113,0.0023162114,0.22216745],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0010246544,0.00026376187,0.00045426027,0.0017927983,0.00088699994,0.0033735698,0.0023162751,0.0025582938,0.1399656],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031646407,0.000038361453,0.0002681935,0.00025232194,0.0000036274112,0.00019492222,0.00064893416,0.00014761738,0.0003464689,0.11475758,0.7848145,0.09849585],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000016492728,0.0000022092913,0.00010982294,0.00008416683,4.288228e-7,0.00003382844,0.000109082655,0.000007645617,0.00002485517,0.0019509745,0.9976738,0.0000016506858],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005745268,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008437074,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22216745,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031574278,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001400425,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.74322414},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4395027506","doi":"10.59403/1tvzyyw010","title":"Chapter 10: Personal Scope of the Mutual Agreement Procedure and Arbitration Provisions, and the Mutual Assistance Provisions","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"WU Institute for Austrian and International Tax Law, tax law and policy series.","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"York University; Université du Luxembourg","keywords":"Scope (computer science); Arbitration; Agreement; Law; Mutual recognition; Law and economics; Business; Political science; Computer science; Sociology; International trade; Philosophy; Linguistics; Programming language","score_opus":0.029031522470391657,"score_gpt":0.2958994099348989,"score_spread":0.26686788746450724,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4395027506","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0014057218,0.013777271,0.008157417,0.018093808,0.00509363,0.00014495588,0.0003878488,0.00026869832,0.95267063],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.028555857,0.013365207,0.0052241287,0.010778528,0.0042626974,0.0003372848,0.0005508626,0.0004204899,0.93650484],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979113,0.00051854964,0.0000879215,0.00024405669,0.0010433794,0.00019480863],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99869907,0.00060646114,0.00011240158,0.00016539115,0.00034946055,0.000067222274],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011916851,0.00056046527,0.00045159212,0.0008393263,0.0021187156,0.0069800513,0.0009295399,0.0030565523,0.04272371],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0044849385,0.00049966265,0.00057251303,0.0013600956,0.0025557652,0.0059380285,0.002031515,0.004896847,0.018934762],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016830396,0.000029309766,0.00014496835,0.0001534577,0.0000034807517,0.00006142141,0.0010811205,0.00019870668,0.00030902965,0.568952,0.38632008,0.042729456],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000002863022,0.000007669359,0.00021502472,0.00019025514,0.0000023249181,0.000051697305,0.00020356655,0.0000814937,0.00013606937,0.023088098,0.97601557,0.000005314553],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0045693726,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004880107,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04272371,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021813416,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033032778,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14292508},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4395027554","doi":"10.59403/1tvzyyw007","title":"Chapter 7: Dual Residence for Non-Individuals","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"WU Institute for Austrian and International Tax Law, tax law and policy series.","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"York University; Université du Luxembourg","keywords":"Dual (grammatical number); Residence; Sociology; Demography; Art","score_opus":0.04955234767842484,"score_gpt":0.32891535915128667,"score_spread":0.2793630114728618,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4395027554","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002998989,0.03555944,0.0029996398,0.03616342,0.00985567,0.000062867744,0.00033976682,0.00017144284,0.91184884],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.026137438,0.021911016,0.0010555716,0.012965391,0.004372783,0.000097150056,0.00035529744,0.0002022683,0.9329031],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995536,0.00009043864,0.000014082102,0.00008524167,0.00018313206,0.00007347478],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997081,0.000103140366,0.000025019144,0.00003501295,0.000082655235,0.00004601839],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00032849,0.0004058356,0.0004248615,0.0005240803,0.001868825,0.0036779095,0.0006708554,0.0019015381,0.043578275],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001159285,0.00023054519,0.00046399096,0.0006963136,0.0012469644,0.003377739,0.0016890214,0.0033585636,0.014860766],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016490265,0.00003267873,0.00023685378,0.00016117957,0.0000028270551,0.00010628781,0.0015534799,0.000102085745,0.0002128989,0.33065522,0.6184809,0.048439078],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000016161489,0.000007981324,0.00022391278,0.00016847606,0.0000018410906,0.00007303844,0.00030571237,0.000028816066,0.00006720061,0.01073525,0.9883837,0.0000024166982],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035104558,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005189474,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.043578275,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0015728321,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016317096,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14578384},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4395059326","doi":"10.29173/alr2701","title":"A \"Century\" Overdue: Revisiting the Doctrine of Spoliation in the Age of Electronic Documents","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Doctrine; Philosophy; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.01432152474522506,"score_gpt":0.3170235668739854,"score_spread":0.30270204212876034,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4395059326","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.022833878,0.24249403,0.01100416,0.28711578,0.0041683866,0.000066180844,0.00012939279,0.00007497205,0.43211326],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.75036526,0.12819639,0.005960161,0.071586825,0.0039614723,0.000073201394,0.00006446259,0.00010861502,0.03968362],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9882841,0.004127988,0.00040948307,0.00078368594,0.004797853,0.0015968967],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9737464,0.016619744,0.0009988425,0.0012223792,0.00640864,0.001004018],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0144074205,0.000358403,0.00062783394,0.005380861,0.015264496,0.023005186,0.0028292225,0.008563494,0.0030498928],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020607559,0.00039199676,0.00045996203,0.0055639804,0.07658871,0.015460265,0.004971587,0.0109156575,0.000401296],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000037767193,0.0000029461826,0.0001528951,0.00003555529,0.0000018320692,0.00006557136,0.0038133387,0.000087981476,0.000026067517,0.9827587,0.00570442,0.0073469128],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008756191,0.00002066828,0.0016986241,0.001467889,0.00001873938,0.00022467933,0.011561471,0.00046572983,0.00024793835,0.42320648,0.5610287,0.000050364095],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.66322637,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7079515,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.66322637,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06792042,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09412928,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6775139},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4395099524","doi":"10.1017/9781839704444.010","title":"Remembering and Celebrating the International Society of Family Law at Our Golden Jubilee","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Art history; Genealogy; History; Art; Political science","score_opus":0.040094118637564194,"score_gpt":0.3184921331584627,"score_spread":0.2783980145208985,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4395099524","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.003457535,0.09742737,0.00081653014,0.6707227,0.14887577,0.000022596778,0.00009207558,0.00009297658,0.078492336],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.10680778,0.054893784,0.0023213679,0.21624586,0.1026734,0.00012298448,0.00019412268,0.0005509073,0.5161898],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9939918,0.00211629,0.0001522462,0.00068118266,0.0015344636,0.0015239547],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99381316,0.0006925237,0.00026060667,0.00021190851,0.0010704257,0.0039514285],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005726727,0.0010974199,0.000610398,0.0017564469,0.015553099,0.012539795,0.0012383284,0.005686047,0.015039725],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007898147,0.00040435194,0.000708149,0.00093853887,0.0077443495,0.0083657885,0.0070717265,0.015132277,0.0027257525],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013086539,0.000029797511,0.0003378895,0.00004656292,0.0000050606345,0.00022964756,0.0066597154,0.000020691947,0.0001370415,0.029830774,0.93960905,0.023080762],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000001034312,0.0000075184003,0.00034302135,0.00008101888,0.000001063113,0.00007699583,0.0021659187,0.000007931522,0.00002683143,0.0013265477,0.9959566,0.0000054997713],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.027542308,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.056307286,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.027542308,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008186655,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010347447,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05939859},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4395458534","doi":"10.1515/9780228020219","title":"The Notwithstanding Clause and the Canadian Charter","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"McGill-Queen's University Press eBooks","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.01566150267862535,"score_gpt":0.22838482380273958,"score_spread":0.21272332112411424,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4395458534","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013600762,0.008649627,0.0056734513,0.04762427,0.0016474202,0.0001516118,0.0011303991,0.0001409261,0.9213815],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5562603,0.013113524,0.014909692,0.037484918,0.00086620863,0.0002375504,0.001541734,0.00028365277,0.3753025],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99149346,0.0007721732,0.0002164336,0.001136693,0.0043962123,0.0019850773],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99383694,0.0012575783,0.00026914425,0.0003842331,0.0037312126,0.00052076724],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003790332,0.0005208498,0.00042774068,0.0021781102,0.01612467,0.008026985,0.0019091861,0.0036763514,0.011015083],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011194201,0.0004730539,0.00055660354,0.0032913336,0.012647961,0.0024542534,0.002145687,0.0053377873,0.0007951515],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000092528335,0.0000033108456,0.0002872732,0.000028891716,0.0000020583796,0.00006459738,0.00089602463,0.00021652551,0.0000880738,0.94923854,0.0407155,0.008449951],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020704185,0.000011400292,0.003372928,0.00024517393,0.000016655758,0.000073614065,0.00096871576,0.0005467122,0.00032447572,0.0576132,0.93671197,0.000094489435],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98493123,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.988513,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09264183,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09264183,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.18401119,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6721667},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396513459","doi":"10.4324/9781003496434-6","title":"Walking the Law throughout the Journey of Nishiyuu","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.045238641089262704,"score_gpt":0.3410663951454087,"score_spread":0.29582775405614603,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396513459","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09087243,0.008711483,0.0016061601,0.0066763717,0.0010917664,0.000077532684,0.00010967698,0.000101289625,0.8907532],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.36207625,0.0077583855,0.0025257932,0.0010639204,0.00013012938,0.000100111734,0.00011962407,0.00013430919,0.62609154],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9998691,0.00002587848,0.0000044986355,0.000020020047,0.00003186868,0.000048656257],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9999026,0.000021731537,0.000007329118,0.000005065613,0.000022442398,0.000040888324],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00021275849,0.00036874955,0.00019919888,0.0004556867,0.009339393,0.0034309065,0.0004707151,0.00071185996,0.01165885],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00030538999,0.00018544894,0.00013186884,0.00088344567,0.0031649063,0.0023115547,0.0025074543,0.0014815115,0.0013986096],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004004219,0.000068788075,0.004507158,0.00039024913,0.0000056743343,0.0033129177,0.5065957,0.00016669663,0.0019548265,0.2628943,0.11343758,0.10662606],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000023387913,0.000026405422,0.0035643156,0.00024264077,0.000005406754,0.0007596606,0.14860241,0.00008980535,0.00034180327,0.0032846443,0.8430675,0.000013052497],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05484125,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.24750069,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05484125,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030786565,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0031789488,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.109044075},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396686538","doi":"10.29173/mlj1149","title":"Hugh A. Robson – A Labour Jurist Ahead of his Time","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Manitoba Law Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Winnipeg; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Keynesian economics","score_opus":0.025588707846138765,"score_gpt":0.2703114869458497,"score_spread":0.24472277909971096,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396686538","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.007008098,0.02295513,0.00073971547,0.8501271,0.016847648,0.000023833249,0.000056599667,0.00004685677,0.10219507],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.11608253,0.010786104,0.0014033059,0.3006957,0.0039651147,0.00002999642,0.0000365606,0.00007332529,0.5669275],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981267,0.00044009616,0.00006172958,0.00025648522,0.0006447392,0.00047024287],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954211,0.00088629476,0.0001304713,0.00012034478,0.0012593191,0.0021823081],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019322507,0.00040366908,0.00046333525,0.00056963717,0.021184856,0.005084927,0.0010879413,0.00812011,0.015021534],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005072155,0.00052921555,0.00025673828,0.00056814385,0.0058879526,0.0022641206,0.0020922697,0.014107882,0.0032898788],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000037284924,0.00004676479,0.002472738,0.0000571559,0.000014427301,0.0014444292,0.0047171637,0.00014619998,0.00076857454,0.10953263,0.85923445,0.021528294],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000829151,0.000017725335,0.0017157977,0.00019296081,0.00000554543,0.0005029849,0.0053149005,0.00011132113,0.00026888703,0.009237886,0.9825951,0.000028625482],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.32037184,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.54090303,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.67962813,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010852292,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.028763572,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.63701415},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396880097","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198816713.002.0009","title":"Note on the Text","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Information retrieval","score_opus":0.022366345624006658,"score_gpt":0.3081068980970454,"score_spread":0.28574055247303876,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396880097","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00023339006,0.0008390068,0.000594014,0.010352761,0.017254118,0.00016013534,0.0051003313,0.0002534839,0.96521276],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0013255214,0.00046827635,0.00028441564,0.0036197484,0.0017618354,0.00012033892,0.0019521891,0.00022857123,0.990239],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99873966,0.00014858045,0.000085114276,0.00015198372,0.0007237122,0.0001508968],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99715877,0.000614217,0.0000926113,0.00025197415,0.0017009208,0.00018151183],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008767445,0.000841466,0.0006101078,0.0023339188,0.0038662255,0.0048706336,0.0014825495,0.0024913752,0.49975467],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0063923597,0.0003498319,0.0006942512,0.0030919295,0.001149507,0.0030378955,0.0026351858,0.003521402,0.3652078],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000785544,0.0000074555746,0.000031961812,0.000045149616,5.8766307e-7,0.000028778595,0.00007247756,0.000015697857,0.00005643804,0.010148855,0.9804756,0.009109269],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000013046889,0.0000016657143,0.000127122,0.00004686987,4.5634826e-7,0.0000143940915,0.000060034956,0.000009720285,0.0000339849,0.00094726123,0.99875474,0.000002412616],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.028343271,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03964592,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.49975467,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0041528763,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003937666,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.71353924},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4396974789","doi":"10.1017/9781009354059.016","title":"Cambridge Studies in International and Comparative Law","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.14899324870604902,"score_gpt":0.43985146440135275,"score_spread":0.29085821569530373,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4396974789","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0026364347,0.08431757,0.00033481,0.04923628,0.0016699441,0.000023659095,0.0015358607,0.00005895455,0.8601865],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.35626924,0.11845367,0.000885101,0.0105765,0.009209046,0.00026097437,0.0034869765,0.00023374923,0.5006247],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9989371,0.00044218812,0.000056920315,0.0001199654,0.0003305005,0.00011340227],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976992,0.001314949,0.0001266054,0.00024800218,0.00041508043,0.00019624709],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014364456,0.00043840086,0.00054192095,0.004511728,0.0017079074,0.0062120743,0.00065104547,0.0015545882,0.097616106],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0046273936,0.00017066974,0.0002204703,0.005803096,0.004304819,0.0035172293,0.0013247947,0.0017135001,0.0067978636],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008868642,0.000011609061,0.00029986212,0.00020950436,0.0000051253705,0.00003818565,0.0018680186,0.00010917469,0.00004890619,0.5941344,0.38552666,0.017739596],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000058727305,0.000010220601,0.0025769721,0.0009285703,0.0000049228806,0.00003139482,0.0016411348,0.0000718522,0.000045747798,0.042492714,0.95218325,0.000007344352],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.052146442,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.043617256,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9023839,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0112042455,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019521287,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3265584},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4398135016","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198833949.002.0005","title":"Note to the Reader","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.02822240224242628,"score_gpt":0.32686747043806974,"score_spread":0.29864506819564346,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4398135016","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0004772733,0.005557823,0.0018988667,0.020099325,0.035160977,0.00015081874,0.0021416754,0.0016199504,0.93289316],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0015512441,0.0017555926,0.00055357453,0.0058817775,0.0029683374,0.000051611838,0.0008993028,0.0007296398,0.98560876],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999015,0.00013037836,0.000060153598,0.00021063254,0.0004918153,0.00009197494],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99758685,0.0005110345,0.0000922177,0.00037476292,0.0011905557,0.00024466167],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00064028404,0.00088983367,0.0008609921,0.0016507856,0.0026956648,0.0073766694,0.0018151072,0.002202565,0.59520024],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006645597,0.0004656035,0.00073098595,0.002148836,0.0009912947,0.005792195,0.0040413947,0.003180947,0.559642],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008873704,0.000010228076,0.000046160436,0.00008047951,0.0000011716993,0.000041784126,0.00013914223,0.000016881653,0.00010525447,0.0037155317,0.9595117,0.036322776],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000015350785,0.0000027702467,0.000045394452,0.000060570135,6.028936e-7,0.00004410763,0.00009145626,0.000008852296,0.00003620794,0.00051478774,0.9991912,0.0000024783785],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0027922993,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0049290545,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.40479976,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016940089,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0016349092,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5773977},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4398482850","doi":"10.7910/dvn/nzk4op","title":"Petition of Zoheth Smith","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"dataset","venue":"Harvard Dataverse","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Genealogy; Computer science; History","score_opus":0.020264571972668437,"score_gpt":0.29374063393559674,"score_spread":0.2734760619629283,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4398482850","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"dataset","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"dataset","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0035096921,0.0039044677,0.00065406295,0.095823646,0.022577362,0.00018286132,0.00072261493,0.00034031624,0.872285],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.005211454,0.0003310399,0.00012383837,0.007607613,0.000460863,0.000025184208,0.00007024192,0.000057884998,0.9861119],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99821043,0.00016831639,0.000040507108,0.00039667246,0.00070306344,0.00048111874],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99912554,0.00011320126,0.000032369728,0.000079293706,0.00034296478,0.00030653784],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012884984,0.0006749414,0.00057235156,0.00081528793,0.008857387,0.00401715,0.0011763587,0.0055742795,0.20863277],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0038526743,0.0007099014,0.00044860243,0.0006448707,0.0018820416,0.0021101607,0.0028802291,0.008182831,0.058768194],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000031982323,0.000009094193,0.0001115768,0.000020134905,0.000001838326,0.00011984118,0.0001461602,0.00003143302,0.00015943745,0.014172101,0.9791812,0.0060151923],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003719446,0.000006769123,0.00034271536,0.000021234127,0.0000012117831,0.00003936816,0.00014859301,0.000023829973,0.00012567129,0.00058166,0.9986993,0.0000058422593],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04274825,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10471833,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.20863277,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004313291,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0061123557,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.69794613},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4398772153","doi":"10.1093/9780191956942.003.0025","title":"Techniques of Judicial Avoidance","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Computer science","score_opus":0.02204779829027288,"score_gpt":0.3061508557356381,"score_spread":0.28410305744536524,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4398772153","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.016184092,0.003168336,0.07870449,0.0063237385,0.00047834468,0.00007654343,0.0000396839,0.00012070118,0.8949041],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85516965,0.0025719083,0.030194001,0.0026935139,0.0005825657,0.0002803204,0.00007507298,0.00017042356,0.10826243],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.991426,0.003928998,0.00024482695,0.00089143397,0.0030099817,0.0004986954],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9951214,0.0024337147,0.00035477593,0.0011511606,0.0008117982,0.00012711636],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0048631993,0.00054673303,0.00047242126,0.0019458372,0.0033263841,0.0056273295,0.001789774,0.0017115265,0.006097614],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009367755,0.0003159609,0.0005858584,0.0010747885,0.0251358,0.0043042386,0.004619185,0.0053043123,0.0012061778],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000017454074,0.0000030456097,0.000037434264,0.000010750831,0.0000015490981,0.000012996503,0.0007626663,0.00009231792,0.00010158207,0.9947472,0.00101517,0.0032134678],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010312981,0.000017476978,0.00020464846,0.00011160817,0.000008691842,0.00015752144,0.00111459,0.00080346427,0.0005754887,0.83404106,0.1629402,0.00001496971],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016775395,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0023436998,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.006097614,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033036359,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029550241,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.025719404},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399020562","doi":"10.1017/9781108694131.051","title":"13 November 1749. Cleland to Lovel Stanhope","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy","score_opus":0.020072833684840086,"score_gpt":0.3335509538343557,"score_spread":0.3134781201495156,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399020562","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00018011795,0.0021448252,0.00027388148,0.005876816,0.010348011,0.00009183764,0.005543827,0.0006617716,0.9748789],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00036250116,0.00041154126,0.00004378858,0.0006281757,0.00027997457,0.000014562886,0.0007093821,0.00011096311,0.997439],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99967146,0.000035019948,0.000015888332,0.00007369567,0.0001421436,0.00006178138],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993173,0.000099461075,0.000028431878,0.00006300558,0.0002864349,0.0002054388],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00051388325,0.00065850944,0.0005601539,0.0011029836,0.0013673987,0.0031985678,0.00089386373,0.0016690023,0.85210735],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0022970047,0.00032464284,0.00032441667,0.00082519854,0.00039583188,0.0014582437,0.0015821755,0.0017934683,0.72908634],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022471158,0.0000055585024,0.000030046456,0.000038709666,0.0000010717558,0.00003040507,0.000010056416,0.000011017565,0.000051870786,0.0013829031,0.9840344,0.014381466],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000022928543,0.0000031204797,0.0001061447,0.00003884139,3.6963206e-7,0.000011019195,0.000012198534,0.0000050170697,0.00001644985,0.00013419456,0.9996691,0.0000013037319],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0064943586,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.021396836,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.85210735,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001045709,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009397428,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.21095091},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399169272","doi":"10.25148/lawrev.18.4.6","title":"\"Bricolage\" as Comparative Research Method For Critical Legislative Innovation","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"FIU Law Review","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Bricolage; Legislature; Mediation; Interpretation (philosophy); Creativity; Context (archaeology); Documentation; Sociology; Epistemology; Politics; Political science; Law and economics; Law; Social science; Computer science","score_opus":0.3736235350714559,"score_gpt":0.6193453327188024,"score_spread":0.24572179764734653,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399169272","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0082565565,0.0044109803,0.9194194,0.0041393545,0.00094692304,0.0067321146,0.0003936904,0.00035852037,0.0553425],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.09579983,0.00154282,0.860594,0.0010467974,0.00022221256,0.037981868,0.00017284359,0.00019701931,0.0024426011],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.7991912,0.18919191,0.002773145,0.004596808,0.0035860783,0.0006608907],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.75714535,0.21228072,0.0047863754,0.021489838,0.0035202664,0.00077748165],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.13444157,0.001603812,0.0025843298,0.012837628,0.0052539646,0.0072080744,0.004160811,0.0030661894,0.015085376],"category_scores_gemma":[0.17560548,0.00076608616,0.0014858008,0.0122902235,0.031568572,0.009098049,0.0092035765,0.0046422337,0.0012546841],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006925793,0.00006140789,0.000309124,0.0009621368,0.00006378301,0.00011860658,0.01492942,0.0003696256,0.00038440997,0.95181376,0.00264051,0.028277919],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00013471281,0.00020389019,0.0011977841,0.0022656475,0.0000899637,0.00027350237,0.010976412,0.0041064504,0.00094380777,0.86875015,0.110989004,0.00006859819],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0013158977,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0025121828,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.86555845,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00584476,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0065500075,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7110035},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4399173316","doi":"10.3138/utlj_2023_0163","title":"Private international law’s ambivalent humanism","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Ambivalence; Humanism; Law; Political science; Philosophy; Sociology; Psychoanalysis; Psychology","score_opus":0.015077751754143142,"score_gpt":0.2671355663726974,"score_spread":0.25205781461855425,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4399173316","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08260108,0.004836615,0.0070545026,0.20098773,0.0005958319,0.000022902374,0.00007988662,0.000049748498,0.70377177],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9790546,0.0009764068,0.0005449921,0.0080082,0.00020955186,0.000020594734,0.000018222032,0.000020537698,0.011146912],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9948637,0.0026296403,0.00011105947,0.00065793976,0.0010559321,0.00068170903],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99670416,0.001794056,0.0002558048,0.00045887707,0.0003739082,0.00041314596],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004207421,0.00022488204,0.0002534457,0.0010719943,0.0072246874,0.011839545,0.0007888456,0.0038319428,0.0029468942],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006494272,0.00026984964,0.00023686934,0.0008602828,0.06428312,0.008963867,0.0050616404,0.0056098076,0.00034812337],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000021615908,0.0000033672777,0.00008631892,0.0000052076634,6.8771743e-7,0.000032064774,0.0075108195,0.000038149796,0.00002078267,0.9891099,0.0022940875,0.0008964276],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009569294,0.000006791796,0.0005339176,0.00008164193,0.0000026809594,0.00012535315,0.011467137,0.00021857934,0.00010879109,0.8605281,0.12690063,0.000016740265],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014254999,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010725976,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014254999,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011367314,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004919272,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08247596},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4400314006","doi":"10.7202/1111680ar","title":"Plurifiliation et multiple parentage : réflexions de droit comparé","year":2023,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue de droit Université de Sherbrooke","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy; Biology","score_opus":0.021441562431827807,"score_gpt":0.263249378109552,"score_spread":0.2418078156777242,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4400314006","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07347771,0.14196546,0.005524026,0.645339,0.006618285,0.00007218911,0.00027009915,0.000039982737,0.12669323],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9129941,0.033624597,0.0023186477,0.036559895,0.00235228,0.00015863345,0.00010082048,0.00006539699,0.011825593],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.96973497,0.018331347,0.0013828693,0.0022823862,0.005855141,0.0024133867],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.84962475,0.119495824,0.008021485,0.0045732646,0.0147821335,0.003502418],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.043271597,0.00045900152,0.0014378184,0.0040622763,0.0075171306,0.012677406,0.003053029,0.0069199842,0.011449756],"category_scores_gemma":[0.13658063,0.00043386637,0.000784875,0.005693239,0.035621017,0.018195888,0.014272707,0.010459103,0.00033472886],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000093049086,0.000034961093,0.005272181,0.00065813545,0.00004400583,0.00039332095,0.15787745,0.00009481114,0.00011590853,0.7475786,0.024051277,0.063786365],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004923454,0.0000983519,0.016684553,0.006218866,0.00009368172,0.0008128012,0.4047739,0.00022506127,0.0006385946,0.16233313,0.4079516,0.00012028786],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07284715,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0716194,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07284715,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01756725,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01683387,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22884482},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401263543","doi":"10.5040/9798400678127","title":"Legal Systems of the World","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"ABC-CLIO eBooks","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Business","score_opus":0.025528425547619533,"score_gpt":0.2696205801807139,"score_spread":0.24409215463309436,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401263543","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0040162522,0.014294676,0.0016239448,0.010778113,0.00030430374,0.00002239356,0.00012219678,0.00004253038,0.96879566],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5527299,0.025755432,0.0049671894,0.009727632,0.0010372608,0.0002265697,0.00065880927,0.00012358082,0.4047736],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99897975,0.00029744173,0.000038038317,0.0001649686,0.00028540578,0.00023442518],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99949086,0.00014700601,0.000055113847,0.000098143275,0.00013217684,0.000076690565],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007641052,0.00040744687,0.00020700687,0.0020513027,0.0046552224,0.009476994,0.00048325697,0.001555667,0.011002415],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017547214,0.00020168224,0.00021895822,0.0024788019,0.015695905,0.007439702,0.0029600663,0.0024668328,0.0014858221],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[8.042579e-7,0.000002168744,0.000052763695,0.000009124912,6.5935996e-7,0.000008147078,0.0017402606,0.000054020304,0.000021279662,0.9809187,0.011370599,0.0058213747],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000029719033,0.0000044797603,0.00060067483,0.00014412992,0.000002005916,0.000048911585,0.0024717562,0.00010275276,0.00003441186,0.34712747,0.6494538,0.0000065563977],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.032743655,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.029730128,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.032743655,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009785207,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007815219,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07099694},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401374673","doi":"10.30722/slr.19771","title":"Interpreting Discrimination Law Creatively: Statutory Discrimination Law in the UK, Canada and Australia by Alice Taylor","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"˜The œSydney law review.","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statutory law; Law; Alice (programming language); Statutory interpretation; Political science; Law reform; Project commissioning; Sociology; Publishing; History; Art history","score_opus":0.028665098347608685,"score_gpt":0.33385518813652304,"score_spread":0.3051900897889144,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401374673","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.003322195,0.33381882,0.00056128646,0.5914143,0.010061413,0.00003923354,0.00013541995,0.000034202578,0.060613204],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.17574799,0.38252163,0.002170341,0.2623557,0.010114869,0.000116054325,0.0002185498,0.00014609989,0.16660884],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9902172,0.002377219,0.00038204165,0.00045995688,0.0050586937,0.0015048757],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9868248,0.0057521053,0.0005029933,0.00022188695,0.005522347,0.0011758691],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009209078,0.0005914817,0.000821852,0.004441092,0.0105857,0.01262225,0.0017188346,0.009563369,0.0036003222],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0238999,0.0007004788,0.00061103096,0.0056644105,0.014902261,0.0060498323,0.0030331234,0.012871566,0.0009228644],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016595708,0.00001823273,0.0007723206,0.0003531887,0.000015656258,0.00015066266,0.0052567706,0.0003427474,0.00007386447,0.16383208,0.7947646,0.03440335],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010529192,0.000010911603,0.005061378,0.002419498,0.000028291775,0.00009901592,0.0066353646,0.00032321055,0.000075700154,0.035749774,0.9495155,0.00007083288],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8948404,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.94574386,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8948404,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.051751062,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12057536,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.37548202},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401713962","doi":"","title":"Multicultural Odysseys: The Role of International Institutions and Legal Norms","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Multiculturalism; Political science; Sociology; Law and economics; Law","score_opus":0.01284401661251711,"score_gpt":0.26536986083418784,"score_spread":0.25252584422167074,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401713962","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.028920166,0.019232854,0.011230242,0.08428675,0.0007359233,0.000046764235,0.000039448034,0.00007063499,0.8554371],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9565424,0.005005601,0.003921421,0.0052163857,0.0005316539,0.00010712571,0.00002559162,0.0000750261,0.028574891],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99229586,0.004138366,0.00026110242,0.00079994975,0.0013509315,0.0011538599],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9905827,0.0054510133,0.0009333396,0.0010700026,0.0008624682,0.0011004058],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009282838,0.00044609504,0.00047034578,0.0019169362,0.014520806,0.018021803,0.0019449579,0.004546026,0.0045862384],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012543325,0.00044396715,0.00038694235,0.0024731818,0.06820306,0.017421013,0.008813703,0.0066834833,0.0003326988],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000014312022,0.0000037156883,0.00008384928,0.000006949364,0.0000011455602,0.00002136804,0.010221672,0.000028340684,0.000010067273,0.98607814,0.0013590626,0.0021841333],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010959069,0.000008029962,0.0007803018,0.00021706149,0.0000053955832,0.00009252047,0.019773245,0.00039519076,0.0000977582,0.8159044,0.1626969,0.000018269584],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.030799966,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.027631707,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.030799966,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011235997,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010661687,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08152324},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401724100","doi":"10.1093/law-ocl/9780198815426.003.0012","title":"Accountability, Private Rights of Action, and Canadian Competition Institutions","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Competition law; Enforcement; Damages; Accountability; Agency (philosophy); Dominance (genetics); Competition (biology); Political science; Law and economics; Business; Law; Economics; Sociology; Market economy","score_opus":0.04865185703594416,"score_gpt":0.26617736540937703,"score_spread":0.21752550837343287,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401724100","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005502926,0.0045766365,0.0022389812,0.011171762,0.00019902318,0.000026007534,0.00008385828,0.000035606507,0.9761653],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.69770586,0.007295059,0.0026723205,0.0040380745,0.00027280644,0.00008941963,0.00015479987,0.00007897368,0.28769273],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9933335,0.0009598833,0.00010229922,0.00043520913,0.0031649426,0.0020040995],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971666,0.0009372784,0.00017070596,0.00023804103,0.001117493,0.00036986527],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028425287,0.00040401463,0.00042499418,0.002741273,0.012261113,0.012570517,0.0015421741,0.0025479428,0.011266042],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004903867,0.0003491261,0.00035117252,0.0035009857,0.026933448,0.0033450585,0.0031765623,0.003883687,0.0006447057],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000012459552,0.0000016213446,0.000061011797,0.000009662909,5.591079e-7,0.000011759227,0.0010030067,0.000103599545,0.000017330201,0.99083143,0.0040605217,0.0038981212],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008494253,0.000008031168,0.0021873587,0.00042564305,0.000012457579,0.000057644036,0.0026519757,0.00094752386,0.0001641227,0.28288552,0.7106152,0.000035986814],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9452348,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9558799,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8861957,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11380428,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12211012,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8257117},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401745632","doi":"10.1515/9789888455676-008","title":"Chapter 6: Lessons from Law Reform in Ontario and Elsewhere in Canada","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Hong Kong University Press eBooks","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Law","score_opus":0.030410200774152418,"score_gpt":0.21052474728259724,"score_spread":0.18011454650844483,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401745632","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0818004,0.019970747,0.0009378672,0.12138038,0.00090456236,0.0001389101,0.0009833217,0.00006492511,0.77381885],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5491402,0.016979959,0.0016772458,0.015209309,0.00020692336,0.000097197015,0.00043358462,0.000106814405,0.4161487],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99739575,0.0002970095,0.00005157108,0.00013200194,0.0007090237,0.0014146846],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979759,0.0003234354,0.000072739625,0.00005505498,0.0009890255,0.0005839971],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012856403,0.0003910189,0.00048361157,0.0017652704,0.028488258,0.012516663,0.0020916336,0.003700591,0.015410902],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0035442947,0.00039279799,0.00058310037,0.0060534496,0.007618535,0.0036820108,0.0026434914,0.0041343253,0.0006346944],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000047858408,0.00006940166,0.008882952,0.00020978606,0.000023635843,0.00080569286,0.06537386,0.0007857661,0.00019337918,0.6343367,0.24035947,0.0489115],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020009684,0.000014577498,0.01882543,0.0005314943,0.000033368637,0.00013122967,0.084556706,0.0003657421,0.00019048822,0.021579398,0.8736972,0.000054486656],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9981173,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99947685,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7655996,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.23440039,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.34437516,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.887987},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4401784187","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780192870360.013.4","title":"The Contractual Lens","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Lens (geology); Business; Optometry; Optics; Medicine; Physics","score_opus":0.030856379468928833,"score_gpt":0.2424374595201694,"score_spread":0.21158108005124057,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4401784187","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0037416955,0.0043234155,0.01924067,0.016868329,0.00035308048,0.000030381629,0.000066428845,0.000047678277,0.9553284],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.730595,0.005621091,0.010796658,0.0058957986,0.0009662564,0.0002864902,0.00015218135,0.000176741,0.24550988],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9934946,0.0033761624,0.00015943634,0.0004964308,0.0020175653,0.00045586695],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99689204,0.0016099003,0.0001884348,0.00042000224,0.00057001074,0.00031956745],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004331496,0.0004968449,0.00039541099,0.0019760977,0.0049649724,0.010612783,0.0013287846,0.0026271886,0.012661796],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006500638,0.00028857836,0.0002601656,0.0020654995,0.036960315,0.007843715,0.004105981,0.005394585,0.00200951],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[5.9105724e-7,0.0000013775979,0.00000955392,0.0000033627182,1.5000154e-7,0.000003344367,0.00045272728,0.000021650956,0.000006593748,0.9974203,0.0011773986,0.0009029004],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000023905318,0.000004454914,0.000054449472,0.00010105434,9.871652e-7,0.000026054055,0.0011506821,0.00025618577,0.00004686042,0.84985685,0.14849685,0.000003243898],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012567178,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008070236,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012661796,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011755476,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008584021,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0852924},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402217647","doi":"10.7202/1110209ar","title":"Chronique de jurisprudence en droit international privé","year":2022,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Revue québécoise de droit international","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Political science; Philosophy; Law","score_opus":0.012153924499546706,"score_gpt":0.28363083891843244,"score_spread":0.2714769144188857,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402217647","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004770007,0.2372429,0.004698924,0.07339894,0.008632731,0.00013214692,0.0008215872,0.000145776,0.670157],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.25240916,0.21635166,0.010563633,0.030182492,0.0053430554,0.00047117256,0.0010369549,0.0004537631,0.48318803],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99367464,0.0016929073,0.00023802528,0.00062985544,0.0028098652,0.0009547538],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9936686,0.0020093408,0.00039876433,0.00030152083,0.0029861866,0.0006355428],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004243803,0.00071824295,0.00064559234,0.00733707,0.009211362,0.012435011,0.0012102195,0.0034392283,0.014047437],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0076648076,0.0006295014,0.0003547284,0.009276218,0.017501865,0.006038137,0.002331759,0.009905556,0.0016773408],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001838705,0.000012397467,0.00042387474,0.00022195072,0.0000052824626,0.00015404675,0.007378476,0.0001395101,0.0002174277,0.8056797,0.16069786,0.02505101],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000027963586,0.000005252852,0.0011280002,0.00028177022,0.0000013362702,0.000081748934,0.0014498114,0.000051521987,0.000056184363,0.008680438,0.9882506,0.0000105396875],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7425099,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7837292,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7425099,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.057963323,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04871978,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.518013},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402272772","doi":"10.26443/law.v69i1.1370","title":"Mathur v. Ontario","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"McGill Law Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.027966647036996067,"score_gpt":0.3052310094489832,"score_spread":0.2772643624119871,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402272772","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014437712,0.0041552936,0.0005732053,0.05268115,0.0011366189,0.00019063479,0.0014655112,0.00015965727,0.9252001],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.14333388,0.002843319,0.0006849269,0.062432695,0.00038842089,0.0001565767,0.0007089937,0.00010393854,0.7893472],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99365425,0.00022545097,0.000113691814,0.0005161453,0.002962117,0.0025282842],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99798703,0.00030461463,0.00007062096,0.000082714716,0.0011500224,0.00040488836],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014531222,0.0005290852,0.00041159475,0.0012370764,0.026560381,0.0053939433,0.0016590853,0.007832654,0.03288166],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0048775207,0.00077484146,0.0010244792,0.0013087502,0.0028039692,0.0015338792,0.0018550617,0.0057654213,0.002740968],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00012634025,0.00002987338,0.0060017197,0.00020598779,0.000041001225,0.0020888671,0.0034769047,0.00023909101,0.0013729049,0.3062969,0.65544724,0.024673082],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000036641028,0.000020796611,0.007303337,0.00015376642,0.00004941265,0.00019539244,0.0009927144,0.00021598703,0.00045437252,0.0049240766,0.9855864,0.00006703752],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97982395,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99454874,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06887633,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06887633,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.10265624,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49973512},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4402655455","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198907329.003.0021","title":"Common Law Jurisdictions","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Law and economics; Business; Sociology","score_opus":0.028002825997369356,"score_gpt":0.30989713818558723,"score_spread":0.28189431218821787,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4402655455","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005119479,0.0047249286,0.0037724345,0.0020308704,0.00026005603,0.000069911344,0.00014538711,0.00005762724,0.9838193],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6300512,0.0083791865,0.0064936294,0.0050018323,0.0006130907,0.00025849845,0.00059604243,0.00012180695,0.3484847],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99623626,0.0010277586,0.00018693147,0.0007051411,0.0010563347,0.00078757555],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99801,0.0007394858,0.00016246965,0.0002996396,0.0005993281,0.00018901602],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020481504,0.0004217325,0.00043930238,0.0023779913,0.0045545353,0.0070837126,0.0013053891,0.0018389534,0.0312884],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0034754123,0.0002609755,0.00044497274,0.002164288,0.007190669,0.004252686,0.0041021104,0.0026091621,0.0032545186],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000014285786,0.0000025164993,0.000061678234,0.0000144600635,0.0000010666997,0.00004350421,0.0008772263,0.0000507332,0.000029964149,0.9884848,0.005340139,0.005092608],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004090381,0.000010204088,0.00045473498,0.00036323123,0.000008519202,0.00023249214,0.0015267172,0.0001641882,0.00014480358,0.16453761,0.8325417,0.000011675593],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01105142,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010516634,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0312884,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0050849123,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0044829524,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10467017},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403085703","doi":"10.3138/utlj-2023-0074","title":"Family lawyers on cohabitation and judge-made law","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Cohabitation; Law; Political science; Family law; Sociology","score_opus":0.013498242166093787,"score_gpt":0.25600637802477283,"score_spread":0.24250813585867903,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403085703","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18884562,0.010688272,0.008060885,0.26851958,0.0011233962,0.00010504296,0.00006413375,0.000052886706,0.5225402],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9511358,0.0016800058,0.0006678441,0.023430066,0.00037836752,0.000026186955,0.000010786575,0.000016284368,0.022654647],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9881443,0.004491446,0.00031526302,0.0010109176,0.0025809698,0.0034570675],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98199147,0.011353642,0.001279738,0.0008105339,0.0027209166,0.0018437544],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016124118,0.00019764299,0.00040098478,0.0009873769,0.022601776,0.006168781,0.0017654216,0.0063456977,0.006471619],"category_scores_gemma":[0.030207805,0.00033314887,0.00022822448,0.000776519,0.03866308,0.0044375765,0.0060087168,0.008555009,0.0003234507],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020590565,0.000038571136,0.00443837,0.000031655276,0.0000051141137,0.00064032804,0.050865714,0.00012265553,0.00021435799,0.9117439,0.0123387985,0.019540003],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000067083776,0.00014217451,0.017370403,0.0008062993,0.000057627618,0.0005788161,0.08329585,0.0007335171,0.001482042,0.33688527,0.5584641,0.000116855124],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.38109186,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.51115465,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.38109186,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018381473,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03176819,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7577473},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403110036","doi":"10.1017/cyl.2024.5","title":"Canadian Cases in Private International Law in 2023","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Yearbook of international Law/Annuaire canadien de droit international","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Thompson Rivers University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Conflict of laws; Political science; Business","score_opus":0.01063988413388932,"score_gpt":0.26899013704301256,"score_spread":0.2583502529091232,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403110036","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.026474271,0.006734955,0.00059910957,0.041727364,0.0018470961,0.00020689661,0.003984235,0.00016392379,0.9182621],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.24276467,0.004967828,0.0015860184,0.04596427,0.00046668135,0.00018244317,0.0020138929,0.00018475682,0.7018695],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9914191,0.00032886042,0.00021975712,0.00055284146,0.003373799,0.0041057095],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9944876,0.0007324838,0.0002245213,0.00028149516,0.002760149,0.0015137788],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027588462,0.0006840905,0.00061800797,0.0044708326,0.025153713,0.009826863,0.0036497721,0.012359379,0.023682911],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012342574,0.0012752564,0.0012445464,0.0058067176,0.0046940506,0.00219355,0.0037138686,0.010335598,0.00234058],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006309362,0.000058589158,0.0031846205,0.00010756215,0.000035548597,0.001159503,0.003956108,0.0003295191,0.00026081727,0.4139735,0.5616922,0.015178895],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003540958,0.000009744285,0.012932389,0.00019580267,0.000042159532,0.0002831463,0.002692215,0.00023909436,0.00039758164,0.0074705374,0.9756232,0.00007885178],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99395376,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99785346,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11339071,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.11339071,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.17555755,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.822711},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403306459","doi":"10.1017/9781009302180.046","title":"A Formal Proof of Correctness","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Correctness; Computer science; Programming language; Formal proof; Mathematics; Mathematical proof; Geometry","score_opus":0.024185736557494692,"score_gpt":0.23629066049899453,"score_spread":0.21210492394149982,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403306459","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0012721318,0.0025775784,0.7982108,0.00705221,0.0014066151,0.0001765668,0.000495578,0.0023735713,0.18643497],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0789476,0.005347497,0.72638625,0.0060200975,0.0010684014,0.0007142767,0.0012018456,0.0026623353,0.17765175],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9971992,0.0008103294,0.00019784216,0.00045952856,0.0011352147,0.00019785803],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967315,0.0019081631,0.00009767763,0.000556647,0.00063182774,0.00007411713],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0031362146,0.0012473523,0.00074197096,0.0011110435,0.0013318254,0.004038384,0.001811322,0.0017198224,0.03420182],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011411876,0.0009937116,0.0019460568,0.00090937177,0.0053095953,0.008399273,0.0032280383,0.005522085,0.016173892],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009951185,0.00001778544,0.00005658814,0.00017911801,0.000008427535,0.000046164267,0.00032455724,0.0017990466,0.0005840234,0.91161,0.03730496,0.048059233],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015752266,0.000018671988,0.00007140231,0.00023293744,0.000008603802,0.00014991773,0.00008635388,0.00407824,0.001174182,0.6691418,0.32500416,0.000018005136],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019935113,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0015782876,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03420182,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0020563467,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0027543395,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11441654},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403729115","doi":"10.21991/cf29474","title":"The Place of Gladue in Constitutional Law","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Constitutional law","score_opus":0.016706125249959868,"score_gpt":0.2963097214409912,"score_spread":0.27960359619103137,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403729115","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04058061,0.013838874,0.088676125,0.1296768,0.0015439896,0.000103679464,0.0001899338,0.00029790186,0.7250921],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9412621,0.002322249,0.011950683,0.018377429,0.0008911447,0.00021179263,0.000054962467,0.00011123379,0.024818445],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98272127,0.00838314,0.0006382804,0.0033787678,0.0028148424,0.0020637023],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98607975,0.009376278,0.00055525807,0.0020506212,0.001173501,0.0007645852],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.024381848,0.00040389813,0.00079705194,0.0018031149,0.012316078,0.018511137,0.0024406791,0.009254424,0.0040383404],"category_scores_gemma":[0.026155043,0.0007767832,0.0007611013,0.0015226383,0.09771367,0.012267391,0.008377106,0.01735064,0.0005991628],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000013939346,0.0000015039075,0.000024112253,0.0000039082192,5.026642e-7,0.00000647561,0.00046008683,0.0000443636,0.000013803598,0.9980737,0.00033949417,0.0010305869],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018765393,0.000017735398,0.00019242425,0.00009493333,0.0000054345646,0.000030491354,0.00046105715,0.0003310143,0.0001175149,0.93674815,0.06195515,0.00002733986],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.072260596,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.046648894,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9277394,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.024043478,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020046609,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17444843},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4403807679","doi":"10.1017/cjlj.2024.19","title":"Marital Contracts on the Fault Lines: A Liberal Inquiry","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Hebrew University of Jerusalem; Bar-Ilan University; McGill University","keywords":"Fault (geology); Political science; Psychology; Business; Geology; Seismology","score_opus":0.04678743187483218,"score_gpt":0.3290234045316248,"score_spread":0.2822359726567926,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4403807679","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.3815693,0.0031956194,0.02038983,0.17867018,0.00021166723,0.0000755077,0.000052811592,0.000020172507,0.41581494],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99589705,0.0002939227,0.00043261933,0.0019468843,0.000050388993,0.0000111711815,0.000003858787,0.0000033306533,0.0013607779],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9836068,0.010535142,0.00033860092,0.0008018166,0.0030559776,0.001661599],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96069974,0.030948712,0.0019021771,0.0019641502,0.0029335974,0.0015516976],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0176362,0.00019348085,0.00055886444,0.0022326612,0.011423092,0.010369624,0.0020402467,0.006247864,0.003951201],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03211508,0.00034740442,0.00038092077,0.0020548364,0.07948335,0.014023769,0.008941335,0.009459517,0.00017456482],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000027839603,0.000008149977,0.0003098904,0.0000043948007,9.2459675e-7,0.00005180769,0.010875148,0.00007545663,0.000015399033,0.9870926,0.00024228562,0.0013212875],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001039966,0.000011657757,0.0010045863,0.00013385207,0.0000041425496,0.00009279083,0.0372723,0.0009634818,0.000093448434,0.9389494,0.021448446,0.000015460022],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01406286,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011247275,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0176362,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013611351,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00831178,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.098757744},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404213268","doi":"10.56553/popets-2025-0044","title":"Towards Privacy-preserving and Fairness-aware Federated Learning Framework","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings on Privacy Enhancing Technologies","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":true,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"Agence Nationale de la Recherche; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Consortium de Recherche et d’innovation en Aérospatiale au Québec","keywords":"History; Philosophy","score_opus":0.022409386602149473,"score_gpt":0.31280323082428646,"score_spread":0.290393844222137,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404213268","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008283426,0.0000860936,0.9904694,0.00020210349,0.000016139355,0.00003722987,0.000051689396,0.0003774851,0.00047644053],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6370073,0.00016530146,0.35981193,0.00034785067,0.000084648076,0.00015347694,0.00031969868,0.00008893947,0.0020208273],"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99366695,0.0025492716,0.00032534378,0.0013357552,0.0015386388,0.0005840741],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9932314,0.002171238,0.0004934916,0.002794594,0.00092361466,0.00038557526],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009745507,0.00070435664,0.0014881897,0.0009477753,0.001212988,0.002897978,0.003615785,0.0017646041,0.0010055787],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013476236,0.00045638985,0.0010961107,0.0013382126,0.0015664398,0.005144182,0.0052847895,0.0027512568,0.00038756884],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00066077453,0.000493139,0.0033490083,0.00012788411,0.00018945162,0.0004005985,0.00048076225,0.6304648,0.0056245434,0.19807921,0.004687598,0.15544233],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018925019,0.000033664022,0.00011169942,0.0000068369263,0.000011597618,0.00007403589,0.000027178961,0.92750484,0.001557034,0.069651075,0.0009928037,0.000010232637],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0016282588,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0014822319,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009745507,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0017604891,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033728646,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05153978},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404379895","doi":"10.1163/17087384-12340107","title":"Domination through Law: The Internationalization of Legal Norms in Postcolonial Africa, written by Mohamed Sesay","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"African Journal of Legal Studies","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"International law; Political science; Internationalization; Law; Public international law; International trade; Business","score_opus":0.02475017851912183,"score_gpt":0.33728173893948243,"score_spread":0.3125315604203606,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404379895","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.040832218,0.23094082,0.00080149213,0.6636299,0.016815929,0.00003997986,0.00019342928,0.000021005852,0.046725143],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.65494925,0.19008006,0.0013376375,0.06528265,0.013976562,0.00016212944,0.00015406293,0.00010980265,0.07394784],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991755,0.00043891493,0.00005829972,0.00009271032,0.00011386546,0.000120791425],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99714077,0.0021887587,0.00026981783,0.000048449547,0.00022155551,0.00013065469],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022602354,0.000700868,0.0004211473,0.00097056205,0.0052725035,0.0058970815,0.00058813184,0.0040447856,0.0015264715],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0047166543,0.00030096222,0.00021970774,0.0013810397,0.008446957,0.0073333723,0.0026194158,0.0061993147,0.00023488935],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011548439,0.0000328818,0.0014567559,0.0009084434,0.000021936174,0.0015735936,0.27172452,0.00032485745,0.00094588025,0.3097863,0.34903,0.064079314],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008590718,0.000028029766,0.00799516,0.0012062578,0.0000071508803,0.0006883033,0.08524053,0.0001917843,0.00047695456,0.0176755,0.88644713,0.000034635523],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019229937,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.028643772,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019229937,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032770808,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004380292,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.038236022},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404552231","doi":"10.1163/17087384-bja10101","title":"Defects of English Rules of Contractual Interpretation and Their Challenges for African Businesses","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"African Journal of Legal Studies","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Interpretation (philosophy); English law; Law; Political science; International law; Dispute resolution; Business; Law and economics; Sociology; Linguistics","score_opus":0.03877806472517567,"score_gpt":0.3209686850953129,"score_spread":0.2821906203701372,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404552231","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6515771,0.00259622,0.015548119,0.0528606,0.00015625631,0.00011238996,0.00008202606,0.000024821546,0.27704245],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99679416,0.00033598577,0.0010079867,0.0004016509,0.000020008523,0.000019490302,0.000007175226,0.0000062324934,0.0014074353],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98451865,0.009596256,0.0008601027,0.00073182635,0.0028164147,0.0014766862],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95314413,0.035864472,0.0036986263,0.002994976,0.0034297085,0.0008680246],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02627798,0.0001595467,0.00039527606,0.0014897536,0.0070825024,0.010646558,0.0011115051,0.0017097447,0.004149636],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05051591,0.00040255144,0.00020573143,0.0015973398,0.025269007,0.008464672,0.004168128,0.003311796,0.0002652341],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023290211,0.00003624158,0.004794197,0.000040658924,0.0000036782528,0.0004584527,0.056431837,0.00030610303,0.00016340059,0.92183405,0.0012706448,0.014637387],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003203165,0.00003565532,0.012043837,0.0005999881,0.00001630305,0.00081926526,0.16539824,0.0032363734,0.0007963869,0.75645626,0.060513377,0.000052410825],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012253568,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.011569072,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02627798,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004115021,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005939,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13897288},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4404916787","doi":"10.59295/ssdoed2024.17","title":"The main problems of international succession law","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Ecological succession; Computer science","score_opus":0.01725977076970469,"score_gpt":0.32318112867823157,"score_spread":0.30592135790852687,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4404916787","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008769993,0.013248476,0.022805158,0.07970164,0.0024743234,0.00011842465,0.00027333104,0.00007749809,0.8725312],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.648381,0.018666122,0.028169755,0.025068697,0.008767132,0.0007184239,0.000586214,0.00023301043,0.2694097],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99520135,0.0013402456,0.000268651,0.0010441227,0.0014682648,0.00067739666],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99603397,0.0020492293,0.00029452742,0.0006722372,0.0007197445,0.00023023467],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0053204005,0.00043606202,0.0008085134,0.0018074216,0.006366312,0.007811279,0.0019416118,0.004142762,0.023348441],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0128168445,0.00039928904,0.0008359218,0.00250648,0.0144651495,0.009801002,0.0041177203,0.008360204,0.0036248513],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000016639232,0.0000054553575,0.000043795895,0.000010047918,7.366825e-7,0.000013128749,0.00016407437,0.000044358447,0.000005292518,0.9937419,0.0036723765,0.0022971046],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007765986,0.0000057069246,0.00014711027,0.000110678746,0.0000020798072,0.00009628554,0.00032644146,0.00023851363,0.000043589105,0.9116134,0.08740261,0.000005756717],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005480517,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0037502062,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023348441,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0049074334,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0039808084,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07810837},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405000996","doi":"10.1515/9780776636429-018","title":"CHAPTER B-7 Liability of the Crown in Times of Pandemic","year":2020,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of Ottawa Press eBooks","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Liability; Pandemic; Crown (dentistry); Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19); Political science; Law; Medicine; Materials science; Composite material; Internal medicine; Infectious disease (medical specialty)","score_opus":0.03156407138720232,"score_gpt":0.23507523944281006,"score_spread":0.20351116805560773,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405000996","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0012621188,0.007207299,0.00042087262,0.004545058,0.0006376465,0.00003418257,0.00007968533,0.000018604353,0.98579454],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.041654155,0.0054232613,0.00053594855,0.0056804568,0.0003919414,0.0000419387,0.00009534501,0.000031138272,0.9461459],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9994912,0.00006078962,0.000013191916,0.00004934254,0.00026187376,0.00012357695],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99976605,0.0000600486,0.00000975779,0.000014658073,0.000114394505,0.000035093813],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00033966312,0.00036680055,0.00014851369,0.0007199606,0.0063583055,0.0041446905,0.00070641976,0.0031200172,0.01891218],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00066723564,0.00021989446,0.00029326516,0.0008022067,0.0037201159,0.0013665643,0.000921513,0.0028284208,0.0036404463],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000044519174,0.000012975832,0.00019101718,0.000054085976,0.0000013112839,0.000116902505,0.0019490024,0.00020392572,0.00025888815,0.7284593,0.2552299,0.013518298],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000015672396,0.0000045320007,0.00044431406,0.00014201902,0.0000018388549,0.00009876523,0.0007354508,0.000095974996,0.00013466689,0.021041682,0.97729355,0.0000056557374],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.44185758,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6574166,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.44185758,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01806802,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.018958505,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8785714},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405534597","doi":"10.1017/9781108622288.002","title":"Note on Language","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Linguistics; Computer science; Programming language; Natural language processing; Philosophy","score_opus":0.014475483808996163,"score_gpt":0.34714202459673,"score_spread":0.33266654078773383,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405534597","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0013622695,0.0007677762,0.0015931587,0.032155834,0.015951574,0.0010460892,0.0067360043,0.0005835177,0.9398039],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0051773326,0.00036459696,0.0009952207,0.057868246,0.0027168044,0.0019506401,0.0010707178,0.0004321957,0.92942417],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99287415,0.0013207179,0.00068855414,0.0010618174,0.002189537,0.0018652579],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9846394,0.009506508,0.00033104763,0.0010369291,0.0037820693,0.000704141],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006237809,0.0021421106,0.0030553988,0.0041844924,0.0171398,0.01304236,0.0068094856,0.034772936,0.18709502],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03226494,0.0022562428,0.0025469153,0.0038033975,0.0043131863,0.0051517845,0.005893594,0.033849962,0.15169072],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007189582,0.00007609124,0.00014051772,0.00009243234,0.000010709958,0.00016271297,0.0006428467,0.00007250028,0.00029643896,0.082777396,0.9106983,0.004958258],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006904169,0.00002284239,0.0013023176,0.00028324508,0.000015028256,0.00005671275,0.0005159103,0.0001860343,0.00032496208,0.013296559,0.98386866,0.0000586463],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.17328712,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.22824512,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.81290495,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008541091,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015623828,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.62589514},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405604044","doi":"10.1515/9782766303267-007","title":"CHAPITRE 4 Des précédents en droit de la famille canadien : le paradigme du choix en matière d’unions de fait et de contrats domestiques","year":2024,"lang":"fr","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science","score_opus":0.011350673589445052,"score_gpt":0.2826917495457145,"score_spread":0.2713410759562695,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405604044","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0044158287,0.019782927,0.0051814807,0.02436423,0.0012931072,0.00005617671,0.00013206746,0.000026198944,0.944748],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.24626158,0.02575773,0.0094123185,0.014528566,0.0017699167,0.00031635712,0.00041909274,0.00017455904,0.7013599],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983191,0.0006932264,0.000049869763,0.00018368146,0.00044677014,0.00030739594],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99867165,0.0008931384,0.00006108436,0.00006117822,0.00021021947,0.00010272409],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017611898,0.0005678323,0.00041804978,0.001974494,0.0077782655,0.0070559606,0.0011724237,0.004614815,0.02117793],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0029200395,0.0004066483,0.00050764723,0.0025509584,0.009250258,0.0036467805,0.0018675829,0.0076002283,0.0025362824],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003856494,0.000012827621,0.000097287484,0.000045390167,0.0000014493318,0.00008805241,0.0072236136,0.00012922306,0.000052906144,0.96588236,0.0199539,0.0065091625],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005152214,0.000011482902,0.000723874,0.0006276541,0.0000037264986,0.00020177882,0.006791467,0.000102867634,0.00012353668,0.20991024,0.7814826,0.000015709671],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09604433,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.13829905,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9039557,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0115397135,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011063549,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1909706},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405959154","doi":"10.1139/cjce-2024-0554","title":"Note of appreciation","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Engineering; Architectural engineering","score_opus":0.007066033378532572,"score_gpt":0.23892461826019318,"score_spread":0.2318585848816606,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405959154","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0013530296,0.0064107208,0.0006659292,0.60648304,0.34046555,0.0001255276,0.00065620453,0.00032686567,0.043513056],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.016405964,0.003818432,0.0011109003,0.51793903,0.104845665,0.00025907348,0.00027678563,0.0002771274,0.35506704],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99660623,0.0004574103,0.00029556156,0.0005635829,0.0016767666,0.00040039525],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97307307,0.00525883,0.0012218531,0.0010020899,0.015445516,0.003998588],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026989728,0.0009502917,0.0016723545,0.001026953,0.003927156,0.0048046745,0.0026213187,0.009126388,0.04086101],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0565692,0.000548645,0.0012107372,0.0007457493,0.0016296803,0.0025736364,0.003413157,0.021211619,0.02947636],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014827897,0.0000054560433,0.00018613174,0.000033145345,0.0000058416026,0.00038390225,0.00013023219,0.000019726562,0.00013722702,0.0015499867,0.9924785,0.005054965],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000071388686,0.000009471825,0.00080036337,0.00010640298,0.0000062778745,0.0006896146,0.0003937885,0.00008541008,0.00008458868,0.0010746269,0.9967194,0.000022843813],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019226493,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04962995,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.959139,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029423623,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0065892194,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13669372},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405994514","doi":"10.1139/cjes-2024-0161","title":"Note of appreciation","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Geology; Geochemistry","score_opus":0.021152089319580566,"score_gpt":0.3030239290583927,"score_spread":0.28187183973881214,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405994514","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0013103802,0.0056163874,0.0007060731,0.6493501,0.30410546,0.00011331422,0.00058617827,0.00030358022,0.03790853],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.017032547,0.003104849,0.0011162511,0.5898249,0.085078664,0.00023271529,0.00022184785,0.00028372728,0.3031044],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9958587,0.0005774781,0.00034873412,0.0007682357,0.0019477094,0.00049902074],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97186285,0.0059149456,0.0013260187,0.0011486823,0.015534499,0.0042130463],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003087136,0.00096683996,0.0018320411,0.0010049725,0.0044825547,0.005627999,0.0028459353,0.011244153,0.037603285],"category_scores_gemma":[0.061697613,0.00058953435,0.0013079421,0.0007781846,0.0020336234,0.0028939177,0.0037966445,0.026130358,0.025527976],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016495456,0.0000057405687,0.00018745849,0.000034349006,0.0000071099084,0.00042800733,0.0001818503,0.000023130742,0.000174427,0.0021333937,0.9923854,0.004422571],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007656271,0.000009253123,0.00071436376,0.00011420542,0.0000067006167,0.0006424579,0.00051452534,0.00009595906,0.00009728549,0.0013706167,0.9964007,0.000026267946],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021481594,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05413188,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96239674,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0032934977,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0076104132,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12579554},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4405995312","doi":"10.1139/cjpp-2024-0379","title":"Note of appreciation","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Physiology and Pharmacology","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Chemistry","score_opus":0.01273913433178535,"score_gpt":0.3275042180371555,"score_spread":0.31476508370537015,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4405995312","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0013576105,0.0075765317,0.0010298737,0.5966894,0.3564197,0.000107947795,0.00069533224,0.00041299724,0.035710588],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.022130165,0.0048686345,0.0019042261,0.51629645,0.11262111,0.00027002068,0.00031387387,0.00047584795,0.3411197],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9953941,0.00076632306,0.0003493558,0.0006876627,0.002341763,0.00046086567],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9585814,0.0073291087,0.0017166905,0.0015085454,0.02399672,0.006867555],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0033268633,0.00097013544,0.0017925731,0.0010016479,0.0031251856,0.004585631,0.0023954634,0.006367956,0.043882303],"category_scores_gemma":[0.070840456,0.00047521113,0.0011093635,0.0005549513,0.0017663084,0.0024333585,0.0037688245,0.019562779,0.031381994],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018685894,0.0000058513165,0.000182076,0.00003805159,0.000007407995,0.0004672672,0.0001706029,0.00002335238,0.00019957163,0.0016520426,0.99080664,0.006428428],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000089536115,0.000011635135,0.00070321624,0.00013889988,0.0000069820762,0.0012623902,0.0005015035,0.00010309993,0.00009563489,0.0014180987,0.995723,0.000026571464],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014311864,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.036532473,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.043882303,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00251303,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0069728065,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14680094},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406154715","doi":"10.1139/cjb-2024-0143","title":"Note of appreciation","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Botany","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Biology; Botany","score_opus":0.012756183260286916,"score_gpt":0.3177263129734375,"score_spread":0.3049701297131506,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406154715","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0020361878,0.008144091,0.0013369848,0.5799304,0.2999691,0.00017393456,0.0012410707,0.0005203221,0.10664783],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.02609357,0.0039560287,0.001782549,0.28545648,0.06583199,0.00027106862,0.0004049737,0.00044012838,0.61576325],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99690104,0.00052634656,0.00022050196,0.00050652376,0.0015567481,0.00028887216],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97341555,0.0050364803,0.0011292392,0.001178259,0.016068058,0.0031725012],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002218086,0.00091035827,0.001725418,0.001084559,0.0034068292,0.0047073355,0.0025086685,0.0059530465,0.06600226],"category_scores_gemma":[0.046175662,0.0004832987,0.00087081623,0.00077762426,0.0013891548,0.0027912373,0.003812945,0.0146796,0.03934592],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020020781,0.0000067463416,0.00019088239,0.0000440399,0.0000054508946,0.0003033929,0.00020746958,0.00002477703,0.000248061,0.0022736662,0.9898733,0.0068021473],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000561846,0.000007168433,0.00070671836,0.0000856728,0.000004185068,0.00042072116,0.0004697382,0.000096784555,0.00008678268,0.0011103683,0.9969908,0.000015479016],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0140859075,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03665339,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93399775,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023106972,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004248311,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2207995},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406160470","doi":"10.1139/cjz-2024-0181","title":"Note of appreciation","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Zoology","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Biology","score_opus":0.011675086781089567,"score_gpt":0.2898226097370941,"score_spread":0.27814752295600453,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406160470","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0018061869,0.0074814004,0.00094811356,0.59934235,0.3387002,0.00014584803,0.0008319594,0.0004171135,0.050326787],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.025855968,0.0045850514,0.0017507197,0.46417677,0.09682973,0.00032229928,0.00033486987,0.00039190784,0.40575263],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99614537,0.00059324,0.00034328387,0.0006231034,0.0018920765,0.00040298468],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9672486,0.0055572116,0.0015237612,0.001277375,0.019840622,0.0045523825],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028007487,0.0009054517,0.0016640368,0.0010295818,0.0034554931,0.0043980684,0.0025851438,0.0075500845,0.042748395],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0550035,0.0005259359,0.0010873998,0.000732982,0.0016997261,0.002494711,0.0037045889,0.01984059,0.02772447],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019966114,0.000005916506,0.00022296348,0.000046549972,0.00000763632,0.00053483073,0.00020168965,0.000024778114,0.00025704334,0.0017849962,0.9902811,0.006612389],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006738402,0.000009683129,0.00083391165,0.000115084404,0.0000059109875,0.0009016288,0.00050853414,0.00009489074,0.00009806866,0.0010425819,0.99636036,0.000022686503],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017801154,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04315401,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.042748395,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026411854,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0059400075,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14300764},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406172810","doi":"10.1139/as-2024-0075","title":"Note of appreciation","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Arctic Science","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology","score_opus":0.012953007715780925,"score_gpt":0.3543738806071637,"score_spread":0.34142087289138273,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406172810","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0013408196,0.005162429,0.0007386108,0.6339441,0.31404018,0.00012271418,0.00047289848,0.00029943322,0.043878842],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.016115405,0.0027934122,0.0011343207,0.55591166,0.089055754,0.0002620493,0.00018181613,0.00026644746,0.33427915],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9960317,0.0006146859,0.0003316254,0.00073742616,0.0017843852,0.0005002206],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9744265,0.0057747276,0.0012246937,0.0011865351,0.013283122,0.004104392],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030028052,0.0010222455,0.0018553319,0.0008846709,0.0046060095,0.006341604,0.0029375986,0.013038329,0.039235227],"category_scores_gemma":[0.059125308,0.00062286685,0.0013511433,0.00072617154,0.0020520107,0.0031066006,0.004155843,0.028796691,0.026491249],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020012267,0.0000071413597,0.00018661072,0.00003937642,0.000007124877,0.0004205761,0.00021895149,0.000026078998,0.00019908666,0.002363082,0.9916061,0.0049058152],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007871314,0.000009023112,0.00058813096,0.00010978886,0.000005608919,0.0005084682,0.0005233602,0.00009916204,0.00009114498,0.0012607857,0.9967738,0.000022844295],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0161237,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04010361,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.039235227,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031723417,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007284238,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13125491},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406172913","doi":"10.1139/facets-2024-0314","title":"Note of appreciation","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"FACETS","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Business","score_opus":0.01173564825068896,"score_gpt":0.3478951955509687,"score_spread":0.33615954730027975,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406172913","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0013585014,0.0055121877,0.00089176296,0.6103357,0.33373773,0.00013487453,0.00046902904,0.0002598359,0.047300354],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.019032242,0.0035371375,0.0013838307,0.5179826,0.11358111,0.00032448757,0.00018661327,0.00025454594,0.34371743],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966221,0.00054016756,0.00034557193,0.00067660597,0.0013803203,0.0004352783],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97713,0.0061233067,0.0010694065,0.0012494833,0.011531481,0.0028964034],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028754673,0.0010619239,0.0020046302,0.00093318976,0.0047506345,0.006189678,0.002762054,0.01264418,0.034700874],"category_scores_gemma":[0.058669977,0.0006324825,0.0012598046,0.00079255685,0.002427004,0.0038325582,0.004185208,0.028358333,0.02111264],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001980053,0.000007160807,0.00021511798,0.00004289156,0.0000069496587,0.00044978852,0.00031246486,0.000028048795,0.00018285228,0.0035445746,0.98958683,0.0056033675],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000075816015,0.000007912541,0.00058212347,0.00012332312,0.0000053061026,0.0005137841,0.0006422179,0.00010359594,0.00008452771,0.0017075923,0.99619955,0.000022423967],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01840462,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04507989,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.034700874,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031909859,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0066257077,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.116086006},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406232664","doi":"10.1139/cgj-2024-0743","title":"Note of appreciation","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Geotechnical Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Geotechnical engineering; Geology; Forensic engineering; Engineering","score_opus":0.01191021813618962,"score_gpt":0.29572890892633047,"score_spread":0.2838186907901408,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406232664","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0015407829,0.006065611,0.0007283374,0.62635046,0.30822697,0.00014764482,0.0006964282,0.0003283535,0.055915345],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.01824596,0.0032278285,0.0010247364,0.49605772,0.07875546,0.0002695827,0.0002514537,0.00026093438,0.40190628],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99621826,0.00047638422,0.00031750905,0.0006867833,0.0018251062,0.00047591084],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9736379,0.0048602587,0.0011644047,0.0010301612,0.015663369,0.0036439947],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002699435,0.0009816146,0.0017734886,0.0010361188,0.004675787,0.0053478093,0.0029079171,0.011072578,0.039379835],"category_scores_gemma":[0.053891007,0.0006037252,0.0012511868,0.0008421306,0.001952049,0.002790319,0.0035257128,0.023678334,0.026568636],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016184722,0.0000054612888,0.00018280925,0.000033098833,0.0000059134413,0.00040981531,0.00017839321,0.00002082846,0.00016525619,0.0019978215,0.9926475,0.0043368237],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000063745324,0.000008057541,0.0007287833,0.000095734744,0.000005555482,0.00048300158,0.00046747958,0.000083997395,0.00008759999,0.0010226441,0.99698895,0.000021981978],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.030465048,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.079272516,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.039379835,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038222896,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00800098,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13173866},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406237153","doi":"10.1139/er-2025-0003","title":"Note of appreciation","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Reviews","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Environmental science; Geography; Ecology; Environmental planning; Biology","score_opus":0.01458240015517653,"score_gpt":0.32746598362241086,"score_spread":0.3128835834672343,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406237153","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0008041478,0.005734213,0.0005224335,0.65038407,0.30372941,0.000096530406,0.00035223423,0.00023241053,0.038144525],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.009090184,0.0025898165,0.00082125707,0.5944874,0.08674779,0.00019726098,0.00013125109,0.00018704243,0.30574796],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99471575,0.0007746051,0.00045369755,0.00094010826,0.0025148839,0.00060103036],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9682407,0.0066153784,0.0015869378,0.0014492518,0.017679065,0.004428719],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0041396827,0.0009416878,0.0017284714,0.0011186593,0.0044382215,0.0065581608,0.0031808503,0.016469512,0.032218795],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05589997,0.0006899235,0.0013926082,0.00091521564,0.0019939563,0.003186937,0.0039333743,0.026314052,0.024894983],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015583199,0.0000063007224,0.00012769981,0.00003749755,0.0000060369657,0.00023358276,0.00011999822,0.000017811122,0.00014965428,0.0020201914,0.99329317,0.0039726887],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000063785783,0.0000084053945,0.0004424363,0.00008869645,0.0000049611936,0.00020964108,0.00022385408,0.000060440514,0.00007349008,0.000886704,0.99797946,0.000015460151],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014948849,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04420024,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.032218795,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033632624,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007888957,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10778254},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406414140","doi":"10.1139/gen-2024-0172","title":"Note of appreciation","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Genome","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Biology; Evolutionary biology; Genetics; Computational biology","score_opus":0.012354807282856846,"score_gpt":0.3082531812014131,"score_spread":0.2958983739185562,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406414140","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0009914538,0.0041126693,0.00074266305,0.6908351,0.25819975,0.00008047977,0.00039585732,0.0002308357,0.04441113],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.014011721,0.0023008927,0.0011482857,0.5740549,0.067087956,0.00017241781,0.00016963985,0.00023564082,0.34081858],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9964992,0.0005631446,0.00024961503,0.00064715947,0.0015781784,0.00046275507],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97762114,0.005430777,0.0009777105,0.0011288499,0.0106934225,0.004148261],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027468656,0.00081715727,0.0015067303,0.0007908387,0.0038163646,0.0060775364,0.002417796,0.011566471,0.0415487],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05246752,0.00050706445,0.0010617878,0.0005755202,0.0018688062,0.0028957096,0.0040013003,0.027023867,0.026691364],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015711537,0.0000053703534,0.00014937346,0.00002653142,0.0000047674534,0.0003019597,0.00017849161,0.000017935457,0.00015033969,0.0028338141,0.9916032,0.0047124936],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000063560133,0.0000070104093,0.00042508103,0.00008562699,0.0000039627707,0.0004441724,0.00043978813,0.00007244158,0.000068160516,0.0014234452,0.9970072,0.00001681131],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013206792,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03494492,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0415487,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002572539,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006632901,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13899422},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406618900","doi":"10.1139/cjps-2024-0229","title":"Note of appreciation","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Plant Science","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Biology","score_opus":0.012508653671556381,"score_gpt":0.28708830353993775,"score_spread":0.27457964986838135,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406618900","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0015589162,0.007610263,0.0011053922,0.6140577,0.31858528,0.00012263871,0.00089589256,0.00044048054,0.05562345],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.024058461,0.004074944,0.0018499618,0.42446914,0.079302736,0.00022717247,0.00036714427,0.00041163794,0.46523884],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99644095,0.0005239981,0.0002585897,0.000598625,0.0018428522,0.00033498925],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9704794,0.0053462256,0.0012460891,0.0011159161,0.017841652,0.003970708],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025028333,0.000827947,0.0015581502,0.0009906042,0.0031654586,0.0042130323,0.0023655174,0.0062257987,0.0477573],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04988663,0.00043693374,0.000942863,0.00068837585,0.00142571,0.0023118355,0.00323602,0.016477725,0.031814124],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016907135,0.0000055134174,0.00018311814,0.0000351185,0.000006105579,0.00037831688,0.00015457137,0.000023104312,0.00024775928,0.0017711591,0.99069387,0.0064843954],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000594389,0.000008569983,0.00071742316,0.00008325858,0.000005442427,0.00059344544,0.0003669948,0.000101578735,0.000107505664,0.0010452536,0.9969445,0.000020047393],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017994242,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.044217117,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9522427,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002386208,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0054598497,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15976405},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406619086","doi":"10.1139/bcb-2024-0284","title":"Note of appreciation","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Biochemistry and Cell Biology","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Chemistry; Biology; Psychology","score_opus":0.00758998031046336,"score_gpt":0.2822330150651093,"score_spread":0.2746430347546459,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406619086","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0013417717,0.0061356314,0.0010186875,0.6092903,0.33797,0.00010157921,0.00059670076,0.0003413878,0.043203954],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.02291363,0.0037836349,0.0017624269,0.48264426,0.09871775,0.00026784086,0.00028059576,0.0004119467,0.38921785],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99558556,0.00069465523,0.00031684688,0.00071870454,0.0022094464,0.00047471857],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96797436,0.006089963,0.001332533,0.0013867117,0.01778452,0.005431907],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030618953,0.00092341326,0.0017416567,0.00090977823,0.0035458887,0.005332992,0.0025545112,0.007324002,0.04267182],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06476569,0.00046039827,0.0010821527,0.0005714227,0.0017976895,0.0026091572,0.003979137,0.02061586,0.029958336],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019862304,0.000006195474,0.00018228439,0.000035593614,0.000006826802,0.00035842296,0.00019120064,0.00002328179,0.00021275386,0.0024046067,0.99087524,0.0056837765],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008039112,0.000009157292,0.000574244,0.00010629227,0.000006094861,0.0007491176,0.00046017705,0.00010106126,0.00009984996,0.0015542185,0.9963102,0.000021496347],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01095996,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.027165012,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9573282,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025546532,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0063088555,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14275151},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406633508","doi":"10.1139/cjm-2024-0228","title":"Note of appreciation","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Microbiology","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Biology; Chemistry","score_opus":0.009787924830809935,"score_gpt":0.2733444852018722,"score_spread":0.2635565603710623,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406633508","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0013883989,0.007563955,0.0009930553,0.58650625,0.36465827,0.000117344025,0.00067415414,0.00039651073,0.037701964],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.021699982,0.0049043917,0.0019159752,0.5069145,0.123222865,0.00023693898,0.00031359753,0.00038172517,0.34041002],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9950871,0.0007179204,0.00040801946,0.0007519108,0.0025465211,0.00048851443],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9544973,0.007886389,0.002168118,0.0016150308,0.027143098,0.0066900477],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003005357,0.0010074712,0.001851039,0.0010525209,0.0027833988,0.004615891,0.0025396105,0.007944835,0.042296294],"category_scores_gemma":[0.070180796,0.0005448239,0.0011759234,0.000667429,0.001688171,0.0024685455,0.0036181528,0.019795787,0.032494843],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018252947,0.000006430502,0.00023022245,0.00004407226,0.0000082972965,0.0005414445,0.00013879285,0.000024356012,0.0002630457,0.0013303868,0.9908642,0.006530488],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008115334,0.000013248962,0.0007998629,0.00012005892,0.000007023464,0.001343656,0.00038558003,0.00011698442,0.00011551912,0.0010687476,0.995994,0.00002727329],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0137671735,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.033074547,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.042296294,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0024246813,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0065594846,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14149517},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406653293","doi":"10.1016/b978-0-7020-3428-2.00031-0","title":"10.1016/b978-0-7020-3428-2.00031-0","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Time to knit","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; History","score_opus":0.01300498420364538,"score_gpt":0.21598146124282808,"score_spread":0.2029764770391827,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406653293","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00011623378,0.00034465332,0.0007006118,0.00023456056,0.000117183066,0.000033390323,0.0004157491,0.0005814054,0.997456],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00039497687,0.00026248966,0.00035219724,0.00011425166,0.000029644532,0.000029939987,0.0002984419,0.00017268094,0.9983454],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9995515,0.000029446759,0.000026657635,0.00015781367,0.00015248724,0.00008204053],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99843556,0.00051030016,0.00009765742,0.00023368692,0.00028874763,0.0004341278],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009085494,0.0021574886,0.001317666,0.0018652173,0.0014145552,0.004733668,0.002765758,0.0044384613,0.97891986],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016585663,0.0008915383,0.00086224335,0.0021332998,0.0013097017,0.0050354637,0.0033376843,0.0023229944,0.9890604],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009378391,0.00010578421,0.00031559446,0.00038401084,0.000013317774,0.00009286099,0.00009332745,0.00027631922,0.0013765813,0.007904793,0.40632302,0.58302057],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000124736225,0.00002958074,0.0004139964,0.00025148137,0.0000065071545,0.0001366673,0.00007667481,0.00009077666,0.0001910706,0.0012799541,0.99750036,0.000010428235],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004483121,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0044930982,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.021080136,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00097278116,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010147024,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03006816},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406695657","doi":"10.1139/cjss-2024-0111","title":"Note of appreciation","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Soil Science","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Environmental science","score_opus":0.012846437921240125,"score_gpt":0.2937677790153111,"score_spread":0.28092134109407096,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406695657","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0014830552,0.0065982747,0.0009251411,0.6461191,0.29825065,0.00011893063,0.00077903125,0.00037476412,0.045350954],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.021510849,0.00369498,0.0016137654,0.50254846,0.08077511,0.00022193095,0.0002792034,0.00034805594,0.38900754],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9962992,0.00053632504,0.00029250534,0.00063845975,0.0018507334,0.00038272404],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.970153,0.0054015573,0.0013174368,0.0011123981,0.01776859,0.0042471816],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027887924,0.0008273819,0.0015903285,0.0009478958,0.0034142016,0.0044675167,0.0024829237,0.007648635,0.039166026],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05152355,0.0004831559,0.0010112609,0.0007053588,0.0015602873,0.002340778,0.0032465113,0.018682837,0.026121669],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015699225,0.000005636859,0.00019669572,0.000032684224,0.000006046031,0.00037914203,0.00016054985,0.000022910175,0.000212394,0.0017121342,0.9914954,0.005760771],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006256421,0.000008945634,0.00074783433,0.000088111665,0.0000053494723,0.0005875069,0.00041341226,0.00009978573,0.0001032251,0.0010798267,0.99683785,0.000021919535],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020284979,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.050619125,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.039166026,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0026828349,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006533348,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1310234},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406919552","doi":"10.1080/01440365.2025.2456268","title":"Jurisdiction over <i>Infangthief</i> in England: The Case of John Milksop","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Legal History","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Vancouver Island University","funders":"British Academy","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.01138246775021285,"score_gpt":0.27994912713641446,"score_spread":0.2685666593862016,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406919552","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.72602934,0.004534834,0.0015356377,0.043015398,0.00019929535,0.00005657417,0.000041188072,0.000016546692,0.22457115],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9759379,0.0006546146,0.00018217413,0.0034837497,0.000028452101,0.000021867034,0.000005147739,0.000010855236,0.019675272],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9936021,0.00261855,0.00023095834,0.00059990876,0.00055366254,0.0023948364],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99056304,0.006664807,0.00070062967,0.00033598646,0.00077462225,0.0009609791],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0057330374,0.00021928958,0.0005812155,0.0006933784,0.042537246,0.0089457985,0.0017518305,0.00860579,0.006553729],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01238109,0.0009978879,0.0002074206,0.0010586048,0.04232665,0.005033283,0.009433843,0.011928344,0.00042321993],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000051489067,0.000021771508,0.0021242818,0.00007305465,0.0000075241396,0.007314835,0.6658405,0.00012682247,0.0003775892,0.31543663,0.0046476726,0.0039777597],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000405772,0.000056819634,0.0058717546,0.00084695616,0.00003694177,0.0022758003,0.62388825,0.00020915111,0.0008831898,0.039726917,0.32599518,0.00016852403],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.45028433,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.58782715,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.45028433,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.019885013,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017840665,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8953268},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4406927454","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.5046382","title":"Both Sides Now: Common Law Relationships as Status in Canada","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Geography","score_opus":0.011587484145910721,"score_gpt":0.27961623770035055,"score_spread":0.26802875355443984,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4406927454","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.66388524,0.0036742308,0.00092268904,0.06380038,0.00029083595,0.00009141132,0.0007125366,0.000028948114,0.26659372],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98140556,0.00055646704,0.00016600708,0.0014716694,0.000015196005,0.000013891227,0.000050701536,0.000011561416,0.016308961],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99223256,0.0007889637,0.00017369172,0.00062556396,0.0020580757,0.0041211457],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9862527,0.0028394214,0.00096075766,0.00034687514,0.0041248854,0.0054754047],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0032977797,0.00020711625,0.00072360516,0.0029636952,0.03882071,0.016506558,0.00276372,0.004287538,0.016916253],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016481379,0.0004028693,0.0003832107,0.0070474492,0.016141403,0.0058580027,0.006674765,0.006703717,0.0005075108],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00014735213,0.00013218111,0.055280585,0.00011416326,0.000043701333,0.00084564567,0.12786752,0.0007744282,0.00025039577,0.73326683,0.034354642,0.04692257],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009311697,0.00007957261,0.15062205,0.00070518104,0.00011382413,0.00038457874,0.44297624,0.002157883,0.00046488605,0.07258654,0.3294959,0.0003203133],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9968545,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9986803,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13842906,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13842906,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.28247643,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993002},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407398196","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.5135615","title":"Advance Requests for Medical Assistance in Dying in the International Context: Some Legal Issues for the Canadian Case","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Agencia Estatal de Investigación; European Social Fund; Universidad de Granada; Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Legal case; Business; Public relations; Political science; Law; Geography","score_opus":0.02000914929675053,"score_gpt":0.3648590491087031,"score_spread":0.3448498998119526,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407398196","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13248649,0.0063460735,0.001985257,0.42499307,0.0009124604,0.00017388424,0.00033065802,0.000041420568,0.43273064],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.87591994,0.006091185,0.0028759085,0.062465433,0.0004867312,0.00010878325,0.0001275808,0.00006460205,0.051859967],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9911766,0.001089328,0.00023986209,0.00042781574,0.0015783855,0.0054880003],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98852533,0.005234579,0.00053550635,0.00029006915,0.0024946702,0.0029198658],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006908848,0.00059056154,0.0007924504,0.0021081534,0.041400556,0.01166556,0.0043886495,0.016784042,0.0116252545],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0215767,0.0005944859,0.0010391383,0.0051646554,0.0141044995,0.0042992774,0.00610589,0.016823778,0.00039830018],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007729991,0.00007977041,0.0068402765,0.0001383069,0.00002585741,0.0053309044,0.038365535,0.00065196026,0.00027610816,0.8812283,0.049279626,0.017706074],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00019048105,0.00006763404,0.028594615,0.001733233,0.0003346961,0.0064949645,0.27312952,0.0023963787,0.0009240864,0.10049678,0.5850438,0.0005938797],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9870841,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99569064,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.115324244,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.115324244,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.19827686,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8367399},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W440754315","doi":"","title":"LibGuides@Southampton: Law: Canadian Law","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"libguides","venue":"","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.028207986712467065,"score_gpt":0.2869046556559629,"score_spread":0.25869666894349586,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W440754315","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0016553354,0.004913443,0.00012008593,0.0089799175,0.00037735887,0.00006359203,0.0012700687,0.00013022829,0.98249006],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0107127605,0.0021470345,0.00020215035,0.0016506508,0.00007434484,0.00006288072,0.00021402708,0.00009822956,0.9848379],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99835974,0.00016823322,0.00008027615,0.00017785076,0.00078087125,0.00043300513],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966092,0.0007627957,0.00010568032,0.00018570588,0.0018396178,0.0004969771],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013639923,0.0010463368,0.00071627984,0.003558836,0.017046092,0.011769337,0.0018870734,0.00999042,0.42221695],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0068486244,0.0010505139,0.00044480353,0.0065197,0.0052932487,0.0046690586,0.0036277336,0.0057461397,0.04870534],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016517317,0.000028641229,0.0005460241,0.00023636318,0.0000052341434,0.00022402075,0.0017521555,0.0000945025,0.000072746785,0.18023646,0.78098273,0.03580466],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000062672875,0.0000038349503,0.0014656235,0.0003001588,0.000004119468,0.000053385505,0.0012893949,0.000059785798,0.00008043493,0.005735442,0.9909787,0.000022810837],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9096596,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9700852,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.42221695,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05032513,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07247954,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8241374},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407729879","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198939108.001.0001","title":"Comparative Succession Law","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Ecological succession; Political science; Biology; Botany","score_opus":0.038966546846896606,"score_gpt":0.36373519670414894,"score_spread":0.32476864985725235,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407729879","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004331349,0.0073397537,0.0013467539,0.0042096577,0.00036781986,0.000013625042,0.000074794014,0.000014491863,0.9823017],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.58828396,0.010296718,0.001408417,0.0026019078,0.0009546581,0.000105614556,0.00033538186,0.00007717418,0.39593613],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983,0.0008043493,0.000046436544,0.00019586681,0.00039674627,0.0002566543],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99886465,0.00047780166,0.00007041105,0.00013848406,0.00034090344,0.00010784881],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014928707,0.00024864485,0.00026797113,0.0015309382,0.004738334,0.00539675,0.0008160481,0.0012219393,0.03352145],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0036695723,0.00016247267,0.00025619566,0.0015135752,0.0064368155,0.0034617912,0.0022901248,0.0022308805,0.002711124],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000053179047,0.000008138121,0.000089135945,0.000014849984,8.6684594e-7,0.00003121851,0.00076917995,0.00007279117,0.0000150140295,0.98164546,0.013045195,0.0043027634],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000930471,0.000020873518,0.0007577897,0.00033278845,0.0000036948381,0.00012449658,0.0020512342,0.00022661567,0.00010379763,0.2054063,0.79095787,0.000005236521],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.010118178,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009777221,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03352145,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0072255773,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002629152,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11214042},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407746191","doi":"10.5771/9780739146576-161","title":"Chapter 07. Deconstructing the Backlash: Same-Sex Marriage Litigation and Social Change in the United States and Canada","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Lexington Books","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Backlash; Political science; Gender studies; Demography; Sociology; Engineering; Mechanical engineering","score_opus":0.03383495484500468,"score_gpt":0.266002593717724,"score_spread":0.23216763887271932,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407746191","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0052466015,0.039003722,0.0005431436,0.037797187,0.0014984803,0.00007456145,0.00043632372,0.000059066326,0.9153409],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.10542933,0.030792356,0.0009512522,0.0141223185,0.0003849749,0.000094738636,0.0003252538,0.00010820958,0.8477915],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998643,0.0001472968,0.000023386245,0.00008204215,0.00052874617,0.00057561224],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993069,0.00012996924,0.000024795463,0.000017357765,0.0003409056,0.00017998589],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00090200524,0.00065859855,0.0004811335,0.0017870833,0.019722328,0.011649716,0.0024683832,0.0056201085,0.02824862],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0020395322,0.00041749942,0.00047964917,0.0031230415,0.008701084,0.0030305176,0.0021229128,0.005138943,0.0024841393],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008622821,0.00003777502,0.00064989505,0.00008233467,0.0000043891832,0.00011954037,0.011971076,0.00019442958,0.00008595075,0.5244613,0.427262,0.035122618],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007134529,0.0000064524597,0.0029387742,0.00056303624,0.000012002793,0.0001030448,0.02115751,0.00016586545,0.00013193022,0.041232005,0.9336548,0.000027466232],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9796524,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99421555,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08000975,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08000975,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.16277976,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5805141},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407872525","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.5135237","title":"Formal Causation in the Law","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Merck Canada Inc. (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Causation; Philosophy; Law; Political science; Epistemology","score_opus":0.009164324274295232,"score_gpt":0.30048192473640195,"score_spread":0.2913176004621067,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407872525","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.075643025,0.017333748,0.18017024,0.13352883,0.0019546456,0.00020434198,0.00049909955,0.00019155417,0.5904746],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96661735,0.0023133405,0.009170859,0.0032680396,0.00095286296,0.00016624638,0.000101202495,0.00004568136,0.017364398],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99393326,0.003488977,0.00023138436,0.00083451474,0.00095445284,0.000557375],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9835132,0.01245315,0.0009130995,0.0016148528,0.0011009147,0.00040476603],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009102482,0.00050688203,0.0010591132,0.0023871774,0.004761017,0.006672632,0.0012642274,0.0045124157,0.009345144],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020458786,0.0006044616,0.0010258358,0.0016338642,0.026620759,0.00940165,0.0033988892,0.0054002013,0.0006653195],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000017305623,0.0000044125086,0.00008852725,0.000006537543,0.0000033123229,0.00001274269,0.00012022724,0.000115552735,0.000008433979,0.9985905,0.00050491723,0.0005431699],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000049615396,0.0000017489563,0.000060413848,0.000009746098,0.0000022474228,0.000010461942,0.000050172563,0.00024899296,0.000012812276,0.9968059,0.002790727,0.0000018568567],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007402369,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004392424,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.009345144,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0050462256,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0053113285,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.048139095},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407872549","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.5134828","title":"The next step in the unification of private international law in Europe: should it be codification?","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institute on Governance","funders":"","keywords":"Unification; Conflict of laws; Law; Political science; Computer science; Programming language","score_opus":0.055059404064902485,"score_gpt":0.35205072775695617,"score_spread":0.29699132369205367,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407872549","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09809752,0.014582756,0.039264794,0.4982764,0.005431516,0.0002402284,0.00042589687,0.00024565533,0.34343523],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.89062387,0.0030078066,0.02965981,0.05157618,0.0015522402,0.0003894756,0.00040376652,0.00018149118,0.022605432],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98644,0.0045497823,0.0014357714,0.0020917752,0.0028596576,0.0026229497],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9726763,0.010556946,0.002297615,0.0070746755,0.0051872344,0.0022072936],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.033087354,0.0005038626,0.0021572937,0.0021176836,0.0068672635,0.019625701,0.0034024313,0.016932422,0.009597533],"category_scores_gemma":[0.053024985,0.0007081439,0.0016024505,0.0030757396,0.025927428,0.03885104,0.011669778,0.0147703905,0.0011468967],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013330121,0.000022074826,0.00020995867,0.00003351163,0.000011947698,0.0000185385,0.0007277284,0.00013034021,0.000036671245,0.9897971,0.0033304254,0.0056682737],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000038886286,0.000021811607,0.0009931793,0.00041696144,0.000019918229,0.000039299965,0.0018012691,0.00033027976,0.00021673439,0.94057685,0.055505347,0.000039445953],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015244656,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008514454,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.033087354,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0070778965,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.027946755,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.17498475},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407932841","doi":"10.21991/cf29485","title":"What is Most Bothersome About Section 33: Or What Hasn’t Yet Been Said","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Thompson Rivers University","funders":"","keywords":"Section (typography); History; Political science; Business; Advertising","score_opus":0.021247723575024358,"score_gpt":0.3104137479691132,"score_spread":0.28916602439408884,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407932841","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0047316193,0.009910161,0.002080776,0.9593614,0.007905048,0.000009814774,0.00007312962,0.000032564538,0.015895417],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.26618826,0.020992903,0.004551682,0.6676212,0.016631965,0.00005257923,0.00014609424,0.00024403789,0.023571337],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.990858,0.0032369029,0.00024201597,0.0011975531,0.0029350785,0.0015305014],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9877215,0.0063908,0.00097179954,0.00058970845,0.0031785895,0.0011477026],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011479224,0.00042117204,0.0007428766,0.0008237463,0.008138135,0.010846586,0.0029418012,0.009203319,0.005319949],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03916756,0.00023695879,0.00045218223,0.0010578859,0.02308671,0.019387271,0.002240961,0.013791427,0.0013005765],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000048868926,0.000035917932,0.0016032738,0.0005375437,0.000031927244,0.00050292595,0.016343711,0.00020166732,0.0005626531,0.6471441,0.28289306,0.050094355],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010633639,0.000024407307,0.001981233,0.0018067053,0.000022668724,0.00041132735,0.03537509,0.00024947073,0.0007039378,0.28519204,0.6740798,0.00014263585],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.073068984,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10284087,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.073068984,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0069501903,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.017282406,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14528733},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4407997480","doi":"10.3366/ircl.2025.0595","title":"Note from the Senior Editor","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Research in Children s Literature","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.022415664406430176,"score_gpt":0.4215819235893415,"score_spread":0.3991662591829113,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4407997480","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00013646262,0.0023424795,0.00013732623,0.5081479,0.48612353,0.000036214213,0.00006466196,0.000036458583,0.0029748941],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0017840244,0.0016074767,0.00018796325,0.7231884,0.24445459,0.00007922259,0.00002348193,0.00004331578,0.028631484],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9944965,0.0008379784,0.0007966049,0.0012182622,0.0021113919,0.00053925917],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97233635,0.0102211945,0.0019476308,0.0011392154,0.010406447,0.003949201],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006744706,0.0013832933,0.0024504808,0.0018630453,0.005073457,0.0062273946,0.0039147977,0.02936377,0.013993148],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05682391,0.0012547539,0.0017586414,0.0011831743,0.0023670099,0.004061763,0.0028691185,0.03480338,0.011417365],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000105400195,0.00000521831,0.00007751815,0.000035181376,0.0000070426195,0.00025851213,0.00004203169,0.000010659351,0.00003691547,0.00035813192,0.9970868,0.0020714914],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000025772315,0.000019188008,0.0005966818,0.00023639668,0.000027272801,0.0005317677,0.00023998888,0.00008462651,0.00016151645,0.0007911164,0.99724686,0.000038769642],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008963317,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01633586,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02936377,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0029912172,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0073304707,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04681176},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408071029","doi":"10.1139/cjp-2024-0292","title":"Note of appreciation","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Physics","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Physics; Theoretical physics","score_opus":0.01386339074964357,"score_gpt":0.28924537081569934,"score_spread":0.2753819800660558,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408071029","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0011577687,0.0061237905,0.0007752647,0.5894134,0.35914153,0.00010075756,0.00060815114,0.00034627272,0.042333066],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.017765189,0.0035430754,0.0012273153,0.52620727,0.10265859,0.00021821976,0.00026597647,0.0003660151,0.34774837],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9959842,0.00055167236,0.00033236688,0.00069072976,0.0020019778,0.00043908303],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9692273,0.00626927,0.0013541771,0.0012187135,0.017627975,0.0043026423],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002733832,0.0010199517,0.0018584622,0.0010719156,0.00419849,0.005271148,0.002634058,0.009461457,0.042388517],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06469696,0.00057477277,0.0012968478,0.00069354335,0.0018996982,0.0030499785,0.0037308093,0.023985041,0.032150835],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000014483598,0.0000052034798,0.0001435009,0.00003087451,0.0000059596264,0.0003577618,0.00014262798,0.000019761155,0.00014225468,0.0020434752,0.99271446,0.004379541],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006654814,0.000008389943,0.00061424566,0.00010918163,0.000006262193,0.00070203,0.00041966903,0.000094573385,0.00009365547,0.0015936499,0.99632734,0.00002439903],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01653482,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04140384,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.042388517,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002857629,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0067244447,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14180374},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4408616048","doi":"10.5040/9781509970988","title":"Promise of Legality","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Hart Publishing eBooks","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Principle of legality; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.03207437519503229,"score_gpt":0.2990559866967297,"score_spread":0.2669816115016974,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4408616048","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.003783782,0.01867968,0.0071982867,0.20836051,0.0021267452,0.000024607913,0.00009428895,0.00009486757,0.7596373],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6749471,0.018696751,0.0063890414,0.06722192,0.008337698,0.00023346474,0.0001880097,0.00033545258,0.22365068],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99154,0.0034684183,0.00023373107,0.0015711782,0.0020070814,0.001179706],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9920769,0.0041378834,0.00044730178,0.0014275805,0.00097572914,0.0009347741],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008754491,0.0006428154,0.00083193474,0.001865852,0.012804211,0.018154543,0.0017252654,0.00870898,0.013586603],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012047624,0.0005331338,0.0008514163,0.0010036492,0.07793652,0.02413594,0.011512435,0.015097523,0.0034383636],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000015214405,0.000001913026,0.000012547014,0.000008457926,0.0000010292854,0.000014126116,0.0006041228,0.000021225986,0.000013341866,0.99328035,0.004904724,0.0011367532],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004545574,0.000006486628,0.00004796394,0.00009139289,0.000002381759,0.00005653264,0.0007470601,0.00007554795,0.00004079924,0.7690809,0.22983931,0.0000070742767],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0067396695,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0053024227,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.018154543,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011125113,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011005595,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.080718756},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409148924","doi":"10.1093/jnlids/idaf017","title":"<i>Deripaska v Montenegro</i>: the alpha and omega of State succession to BITs","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of International Dispute Settlement","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Montenegro; Omega; Ecological succession; Alpha (finance); State (computer science); Mathematics; Philosophy; History; Biology; Ethnology; Botany; Statistics; Linguistics; Algorithm","score_opus":0.009722941722857389,"score_gpt":0.3239730956249972,"score_spread":0.31425015390213984,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409148924","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.1557345,0.00084214093,0.0021949501,0.015206118,0.0003369656,0.00006647052,0.00004931108,0.00001783825,0.8255518],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9745198,0.00017164725,0.00033383697,0.0025150059,0.0000712068,0.00003235498,0.000011539858,0.000008729737,0.022335917],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9944043,0.001275985,0.00022545576,0.00064992247,0.00098586,0.0024583458],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984359,0.00065393304,0.00021134324,0.00023888813,0.00021804347,0.00024184473],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0047847833,0.00022455076,0.0005738501,0.00075882697,0.00621818,0.007120579,0.0014509347,0.0042507485,0.0054217544],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005261381,0.00037638843,0.0005705147,0.0006329456,0.01029153,0.0026209238,0.005128386,0.006460064,0.00047649432],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000055512395,0.000023689352,0.001761063,0.000023564095,0.0000071331037,0.00072784483,0.0016094977,0.00028593122,0.00031039433,0.98743606,0.0038312413,0.003928159],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002612145,0.00027457302,0.025728399,0.0008410027,0.00020008338,0.0036481863,0.024089204,0.0059285234,0.004447983,0.39280462,0.54148173,0.0002944914],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05514277,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09666107,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05514277,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007792848,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0046155774,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10964358},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409443593","doi":"10.5539/jpl.v18n2p47","title":"The Expansion of China’s Exclusive Jurisdiction in International Civil Procedure: Legal Transplant or False Analogies?","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Politics and Law","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Office for Philosophy and Social Sciences; China Scholarship Council","keywords":"Jurisdiction; China; Political science; Law; Civil procedure; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.012586918219278645,"score_gpt":0.30773541178842195,"score_spread":0.2951484935691433,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409443593","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6426169,0.0032357809,0.024309225,0.033266325,0.00052267057,0.00011814754,0.00015077341,0.00010031182,0.29567984],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99201536,0.00039821817,0.0015343598,0.0023765343,0.000098519115,0.000042899665,0.00003444272,0.000009602381,0.0034900492],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99330306,0.0018150727,0.0003659683,0.0011787065,0.0022973989,0.0010397516],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99044,0.004394704,0.0012409879,0.002502244,0.0010665182,0.00035553848],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007056618,0.00020290432,0.0004931171,0.0020221053,0.0030683633,0.0051541016,0.0021940365,0.0022427305,0.0056477133],"category_scores_gemma":[0.018876366,0.00023364699,0.00062585826,0.0026132863,0.021190112,0.010066224,0.004481574,0.0053170477,0.0002863606],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000027816002,0.000015683956,0.004702168,0.000038032587,0.000010897143,0.00030130285,0.0053955554,0.00038201988,0.00023260021,0.96352637,0.0011079526,0.024259644],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000075053526,0.00015706701,0.04284493,0.0005165548,0.00012376701,0.00086654193,0.011258561,0.009042941,0.0023321607,0.81709814,0.115549766,0.00013455452],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0135990335,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012105118,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0135990335,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006547811,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0055729053,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.047507882},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409691613","doi":"10.63485/64d27-7t570","title":"The access principle","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Business","score_opus":0.06370695146254446,"score_gpt":0.4337911804431264,"score_spread":0.37008422898058196,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409691613","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006502413,0.034105837,0.08729503,0.13638453,0.0021924148,0.000100633464,0.00038575393,0.00013163537,0.73290175],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.69592065,0.02985437,0.03080214,0.049391143,0.006840371,0.0005644283,0.00037186302,0.00033502368,0.18592],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99525154,0.0016352269,0.00021259523,0.0010542847,0.0014089507,0.00043738974],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9947279,0.0033970296,0.0002792828,0.0006674259,0.00068368297,0.00024459301],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004575769,0.00058879703,0.0008175031,0.0013010387,0.0042225337,0.008584823,0.0012256993,0.006669519,0.01314598],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011412441,0.00061584683,0.0009520416,0.0016772513,0.017782846,0.020816626,0.0040572328,0.008094718,0.002586407],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000036568495,0.0000028267914,0.000020890946,0.000013943895,0.0000033188776,0.000008271032,0.000093910734,0.000065656735,0.00001908786,0.9923097,0.006006216,0.0014525718],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000524599,0.0000023508017,0.000037871945,0.000026709566,0.0000025230884,0.000020767993,0.0000337676,0.00007428946,0.000043198972,0.9687234,0.031025615,0.0000043420337],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0048861452,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0037501135,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01314598,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0051022964,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0030788218,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.043977678},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4409826429","doi":"10.12927/hcpol.2025.27478","title":"Advance Requests for Medical Assistance in Dying in the International Context: Some Legal Issues for the Canadian Case","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Healthcare policy","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Political science; Law; Psychology; History","score_opus":0.0414000788324212,"score_gpt":0.45370887413456157,"score_spread":0.4123087953021404,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4409826429","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12411289,0.011827783,0.002600723,0.2423702,0.0012592591,0.00028783848,0.00027194628,0.000043042226,0.6172263],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.85508347,0.016190143,0.00529911,0.06171059,0.00051625643,0.00018388128,0.00017848748,0.00006792476,0.060770128],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9933147,0.0008719807,0.00021781045,0.00036764855,0.0016676377,0.0035603524],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9947102,0.0020908557,0.0003057906,0.00014257098,0.0013586294,0.001391825],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0051793517,0.00064690545,0.00060336397,0.0023093205,0.037650708,0.010711903,0.0028348393,0.010616173,0.005704752],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012887528,0.0004361015,0.0010855168,0.004993527,0.011936401,0.0032070165,0.005133953,0.011361693,0.00030658487],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000039248505,0.000073503776,0.0042572357,0.00018795407,0.00001528195,0.009737556,0.036915284,0.0006196599,0.00033055522,0.89357114,0.037485495,0.01676706],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007114423,0.00005167764,0.012913862,0.0017229234,0.00020045816,0.006855499,0.15201552,0.0016578713,0.0007249912,0.045040358,0.7783761,0.00036957872],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.977792,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9925478,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12522529,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.12522529,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.16743687,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9085773},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410086246","doi":"10.1080/2049677x.2025.2500222","title":"The reasonable person: a legal biography","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Comparative Legal History","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Biography; Art; Law; Political science","score_opus":0.0467847796578261,"score_gpt":0.3189757578113134,"score_spread":0.27219097815348725,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410086246","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005527472,0.054161824,0.0038488682,0.65133303,0.0057839,0.000022488435,0.00008022525,0.000028875418,0.2792133],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.49020302,0.046739705,0.0037630086,0.2778634,0.008486514,0.00016844292,0.00010396,0.00016283116,0.17250909],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99700636,0.0016260963,0.000099842764,0.00034941363,0.00056330767,0.0003549841],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962805,0.0027684842,0.00019085404,0.0001466679,0.00036739188,0.00024614332],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004310095,0.000320642,0.00048065514,0.0019657162,0.009302122,0.008091862,0.001107835,0.008010565,0.005358676],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008941893,0.0002897973,0.00029234003,0.0016080246,0.023703944,0.008357881,0.0023626473,0.01183127,0.0012090529],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000034073241,0.0000065348504,0.000043308977,0.000013547719,9.924336e-7,0.000055117696,0.0032587494,0.000036752703,0.000018745754,0.9462242,0.04777645,0.0025621552],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005158096,0.000009090399,0.00018730479,0.00038837778,0.0000026980379,0.00015273909,0.0039549135,0.00012448439,0.00004965351,0.2784975,0.71661353,0.0000145072145],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.019103203,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014011233,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019103203,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005875741,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0053058723,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.042631626},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410406545","doi":"10.17223/22253513/55/12","title":"Good faith in civil law: legislation, doctrine, case law","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta Pravo","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Doctrine; Legislation; Civil law (Civil law); Political science; Good faith; Faith; Common law; Public law; Philosophy; Theology","score_opus":0.010835086522614959,"score_gpt":0.27700078321015625,"score_spread":0.2661656966875413,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410406545","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23587237,0.120618075,0.1388155,0.06765256,0.0014185464,0.0003523637,0.00012277806,0.0001353429,0.43501246],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9570131,0.015817339,0.018785631,0.0019545371,0.00051704556,0.000187716,0.000050863713,0.000022748201,0.005650966],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98581517,0.010737272,0.0005497648,0.0005508517,0.0019374812,0.00040937032],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.966093,0.029659549,0.0018289814,0.00119824,0.00097118603,0.0002489566],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012613458,0.00025584587,0.0004926435,0.0037517692,0.0040992266,0.010647331,0.0010158399,0.0032772336,0.0014372227],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01885738,0.00027144508,0.00029803973,0.0056353826,0.037713025,0.008504505,0.003439336,0.0031716635,0.00020798658],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000030463614,0.000017610326,0.00041382815,0.00010145174,0.0000020164046,0.00015157912,0.010936186,0.00016291947,0.00006345189,0.98010135,0.00066362234,0.007382999],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008144327,0.00008961353,0.0033716017,0.001905004,0.000016196,0.00072550453,0.0352232,0.0018437593,0.0007113349,0.76741594,0.18865758,0.00003217711],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0021841791,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0019568838,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.012613458,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004806773,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005301535,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.066707134},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410785159","doi":"10.1093/9780199289011.003.0046","title":"Indirect Infringement","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.05774787078388627,"score_gpt":0.2836102972743134,"score_spread":0.22586242649042715,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410785159","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0024927594,0.0109614115,0.006218831,0.0022719007,0.00089998805,0.00008247786,0.00016426225,0.00005259824,0.97685575],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.15774217,0.031714235,0.0057108887,0.0074270987,0.0033769535,0.00040826664,0.00054582855,0.00024593176,0.7928286],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99081343,0.0018748543,0.00063139317,0.001367478,0.0045860135,0.000726832],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.993962,0.0031272026,0.0005571891,0.0011046622,0.0010431309,0.0002058545],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0036588118,0.0013679229,0.0009509388,0.0030299977,0.0023839592,0.0088323355,0.0018795675,0.0046266294,0.0748167],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010079476,0.0006260683,0.0010921827,0.0023140747,0.007884685,0.007331577,0.0066682138,0.0062284246,0.01864879],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016618329,0.00003262333,0.00026787163,0.00030872115,0.000014994592,0.000364393,0.0009665002,0.00032466205,0.00048383503,0.92364454,0.028083514,0.045491803],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009140617,0.000053443735,0.0003434433,0.0010329982,0.000026577041,0.00081197754,0.00025407353,0.0002471093,0.0010124223,0.20706102,0.7891261,0.00002167823],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0019353578,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001754794,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0748167,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0038942548,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0029156127,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.25028682},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410785181","doi":"10.1093/9780199289011.003.0057","title":"Court Hierarchies and Appeal Routes","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.03460893872970739,"score_gpt":0.2672966941032091,"score_spread":0.23268775537350173,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410785181","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0063070348,0.0031881423,0.012443259,0.0040018708,0.00022823174,0.00006033719,0.00014465375,0.00007254099,0.97355396],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6756641,0.0047462885,0.011019004,0.0022199291,0.00052181125,0.0001988303,0.00038551682,0.00026003263,0.30498445],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9958221,0.0013447038,0.0001436913,0.00046624694,0.0016736953,0.00054963445],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9970239,0.0017233178,0.00016568869,0.00019967124,0.0007021346,0.00018523665],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019760854,0.00033117158,0.00026038795,0.0021596423,0.0033953534,0.007478053,0.0010608172,0.0014912772,0.046315864],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006482911,0.00042196386,0.00036620098,0.0019266219,0.0059265895,0.006033382,0.0025974903,0.003699378,0.0042375973],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000018016191,0.0000027049452,0.00007874348,0.000009147972,7.345168e-7,0.000026367663,0.00077061285,0.0001311959,0.000033165445,0.98760635,0.005074819,0.0062644407],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010313272,0.000009513335,0.00077133457,0.00020924586,0.000004094925,0.00013195424,0.001529549,0.000711481,0.00009295684,0.6242019,0.3723121,0.000015590838],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013135252,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.014095035,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.046315864,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005981005,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0028618292,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.15494204},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410785311","doi":"10.1093/9780199289011.003.0049","title":"Restrictions on Remedies","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Business","score_opus":0.08263441978788812,"score_gpt":0.3028758547031378,"score_spread":0.22024143491524972,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410785311","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0013598046,0.0067875786,0.00796467,0.0033300843,0.0008234751,0.00011350432,0.00016891092,0.000141211,0.9793107],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.14173073,0.01795905,0.01568214,0.008809972,0.0024121085,0.00066748954,0.00062237965,0.0004487037,0.8116673],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99154073,0.0016121728,0.0006336006,0.0012086915,0.0044026673,0.0006021904],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9924412,0.0043448093,0.00032456772,0.0014508805,0.0012966449,0.0001419314],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037528365,0.0011146474,0.0010416722,0.0025136503,0.0024488403,0.0063315853,0.003246394,0.0057804384,0.06259768],"category_scores_gemma":[0.012929323,0.0007560451,0.0012187231,0.0011604953,0.0069531924,0.007940619,0.003437707,0.008431499,0.016288819],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016238546,0.00003568229,0.00006297395,0.00019207371,0.000006420035,0.00012444999,0.00050742534,0.0006944971,0.00039517664,0.92838466,0.034669895,0.03491063],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012057787,0.000029022998,0.00015885929,0.0007666732,0.000011970937,0.00021681105,0.00013797879,0.00035444085,0.00051443366,0.15307851,0.8446921,0.000027138301],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004127438,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004000514,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06259768,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0042750756,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00434698,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.20941007},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410785493","doi":"10.1093/9780199677993.003.0009","title":"Statutory Reform in Other Jurisdictions","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statutory law; Business; Law; Political science; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.07088974087683915,"score_gpt":0.3345669908827408,"score_spread":0.26367725000590164,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410785493","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019671258,0.004983508,0.008786056,0.015402161,0.0007542317,0.00006219949,0.000068853944,0.00008788658,0.95018375],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.79719704,0.004890169,0.0057523116,0.015016536,0.0012305824,0.00015952447,0.00018982828,0.00010096705,0.17546299],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99448603,0.0022462192,0.00018930319,0.000734904,0.0014785992,0.0008649299],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978771,0.00086282904,0.0001618059,0.0003625153,0.0005921945,0.000143574],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004868884,0.00022735662,0.0005382177,0.0020143343,0.0038534799,0.006621673,0.0016387703,0.0031902806,0.012822312],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0057577235,0.00024201444,0.000909513,0.002320186,0.011677128,0.004621323,0.004321726,0.005728785,0.001452802],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001128143,0.000007004422,0.00003911473,0.000008434052,0.0000014874158,0.000020974256,0.00063445774,0.00018946486,0.000035013996,0.99467576,0.0018646487,0.002522517],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002050303,0.000037879458,0.0008204298,0.00030211188,0.00001816551,0.00008900108,0.0014075497,0.00137435,0.00033450685,0.39060557,0.6049682,0.00002180119],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01670309,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.012927231,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01670309,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012192652,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006636229,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08846432},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4410902917","doi":"10.7166/36-1-3257","title":"Note from the Editor","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The South African Journal of Industrial Engineering","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.02114510440531773,"score_gpt":0.2569793044325815,"score_spread":0.23583420002726377,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4410902917","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0001005625,0.0025407157,0.00024803518,0.26716542,0.72340244,0.000040227555,0.00013657875,0.00009384154,0.006272221],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0021501768,0.0035850925,0.00042901555,0.44781706,0.47091264,0.00010145166,0.000115033814,0.000094068186,0.074795425],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9973545,0.00045809677,0.00030323007,0.0005201291,0.0011439015,0.00022026339],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98527586,0.004528865,0.0005315186,0.0005342561,0.007622731,0.0015068207],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030183524,0.001392111,0.0012774013,0.0011846771,0.00250333,0.0046974714,0.0027664118,0.009449032,0.03958916],"category_scores_gemma":[0.028683448,0.0005020177,0.0013411485,0.0006852696,0.0015881547,0.0044537806,0.0017785582,0.015733138,0.02940206],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006229193,0.000004225351,0.00002543905,0.000028712333,0.000001728129,0.00006946606,0.000010245228,0.000008175331,0.00002227677,0.0002331921,0.9957087,0.0038816682],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000068166664,0.0000077664645,0.0001308805,0.000107004365,0.0000040587693,0.0002264481,0.00005132544,0.000034896486,0.00007231955,0.00042560187,0.9989231,0.000009682073],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003492676,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006884404,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.96041083,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018571721,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003843283,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.13243896},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411656813","doi":"10.51847/mkt45kkkki","title":"10.51847/mkT45kkkKi","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Time to knit","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Electronic signature; Signature (topology); Political science; Computer science; Mathematics; Geometry","score_opus":0.009664524410592174,"score_gpt":0.23153171557340926,"score_spread":0.22186719116281708,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411656813","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0014948467,0.00055019767,0.0012134124,0.0007898053,0.0007645575,0.000119114055,0.0010320694,0.0007766442,0.9932594],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0030177485,0.00033154452,0.0007264157,0.00027990082,0.00007816087,0.00006269206,0.0006639145,0.00022578343,0.9946138],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99940145,0.000060817794,0.000059144386,0.00021201235,0.00015020685,0.0001163507],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99864775,0.00030974727,0.00008035707,0.00022264094,0.00042022145,0.0003193046],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008019899,0.0014710762,0.00084121875,0.0016894306,0.0017234596,0.0043635066,0.001320848,0.0035308697,0.96984607],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017725881,0.00054175826,0.0006401107,0.0021470934,0.0008252048,0.003939849,0.002537501,0.0018586117,0.9775497],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00044414046,0.0003289912,0.0018514495,0.0006594069,0.000026606933,0.0005113425,0.0003196599,0.00042437005,0.0047443435,0.0068714092,0.3894968,0.5943215],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003328081,0.00004993278,0.0013830519,0.00020337915,0.000017481963,0.00039020242,0.00019916582,0.0003656332,0.0005958498,0.00083518145,0.99590486,0.000021939635],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003035723,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002185307,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03015393,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011437377,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00089801423,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04301095},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4411656945","doi":"10.51847/ipjoxybrse","title":"10.51847/iPjoXybrSE","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Time to knit","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Position (finance); Law; Computer security; Business; Computer science; Political science","score_opus":0.009683966214258648,"score_gpt":0.23214000444692695,"score_spread":0.2224560382326683,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4411656945","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0010066581,0.00054095685,0.0010522245,0.0010023626,0.00054544874,0.00007319895,0.0007856282,0.0010604196,0.99393314],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0035484016,0.0003731715,0.00059161667,0.0004000733,0.000091057685,0.000039018298,0.00042350584,0.00030347702,0.9942297],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993144,0.00010632147,0.00006977881,0.0001869969,0.0002241781,0.00009819597],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99896157,0.00022882837,0.000078448866,0.00021323901,0.00029413853,0.00022374894],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011059564,0.0015750088,0.00087365817,0.0025685434,0.0017036307,0.0053530396,0.0011269335,0.003815083,0.9637584],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017050884,0.0005958294,0.0006742538,0.0020973035,0.0013955322,0.0036053415,0.0037447517,0.0019359032,0.96305704],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003193083,0.00023697251,0.0014352433,0.0006685088,0.00002245671,0.000517244,0.00034006697,0.00027171508,0.0023636706,0.022690028,0.33139277,0.639742],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000033844903,0.00004663248,0.0008579861,0.00022501005,0.000008643731,0.0003970283,0.0001888902,0.00021990632,0.00043310897,0.0022762856,0.9952962,0.000016608908],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0024077077,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021327923,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03624159,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0011191282,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00089771656,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.051694214},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412091225","doi":"10.1093/law/9780192871114.003.0009","title":"Statutory Reform in Other Jurisdictions","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statutory law; Business; Law and economics; Law; Political science; Economics","score_opus":0.024158450273894537,"score_gpt":0.2517249303117463,"score_spread":0.22756648003785176,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412091225","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02948579,0.004622165,0.005559936,0.01257311,0.0005908035,0.000036805806,0.00008344737,0.000077104036,0.94697076],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8346977,0.0027490777,0.0028396326,0.010955128,0.0005575537,0.00009343089,0.00018706905,0.00008223385,0.14783816],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9938631,0.001968961,0.00023208183,0.0008100664,0.0018490433,0.0012767484],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9973883,0.0009675978,0.00016690942,0.00038774215,0.0009377483,0.00015171079],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004535617,0.00022003581,0.00049229356,0.0015716817,0.004019245,0.0052150693,0.0016607882,0.0028567635,0.01076236],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006431316,0.00023719025,0.0008762489,0.002330589,0.010534706,0.0038049133,0.0033748783,0.0057020755,0.0012117237],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000020143243,0.0000054876186,0.00005671296,0.000010487833,0.0000018258573,0.000030560113,0.00089945254,0.0002027977,0.00005471057,0.99381095,0.0023908324,0.0025342244],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002787628,0.000035181267,0.0021159663,0.00040733872,0.000023659282,0.000121414196,0.0022156024,0.001631587,0.00040125786,0.37817064,0.61481756,0.00003196141],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.051220033,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04165375,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.051220033,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013412509,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0075810105,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.101843774},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412207960","doi":"","title":"Between Integration and Compatability:The Reconfiguration of Cognitive and Normative Structures in Transnational Hybrid Law","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"CBS Research Portal (Copenhagen Business School)","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Centre for International Governance Innovation","funders":"","keywords":"Control reconfiguration; Normative; Cognition; Law; Law and economics; Political science; Sociology; Psychology; Computer science; Neuroscience; Embedded system","score_opus":0.0707842954916354,"score_gpt":0.3744293849555574,"score_spread":0.303645089463922,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412207960","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6425036,0.00046928241,0.060522646,0.0065306257,0.0000918033,0.00007530692,0.000062595216,0.0001346019,0.28960958],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99670476,0.000033232373,0.0021106445,0.00005297417,0.0000068552854,0.000024583129,0.000016533586,0.000032709602,0.0010177153],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99409145,0.0038984758,0.00017218704,0.0007385941,0.0006437366,0.00045550222],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98775405,0.007327316,0.001144007,0.0017334686,0.0010494423,0.0009916628],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00814272,0.0003086069,0.0004677111,0.0012721773,0.003292812,0.01318617,0.0013934339,0.0021893983,0.0082978895],"category_scores_gemma":[0.025368363,0.0008175315,0.00057529093,0.0014532938,0.028671997,0.02398119,0.0070917974,0.003968685,0.00040651648],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00020795126,0.00010205986,0.0050321356,0.00004713283,0.000021854368,0.00016787124,0.061970104,0.0010664553,0.0015021205,0.9089591,0.00049572863,0.02042758],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000058285863,0.000070494425,0.009419424,0.00008542476,0.000029141222,0.00016542709,0.032435454,0.005234499,0.00072337314,0.9438256,0.007904065,0.00004877156],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006206981,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004492285,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01318617,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003683692,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0038173725,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.043063343},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412264572","doi":"","title":"Book Review: Review of Lucja Biel: Lost in the Eurofog: The Textual Fit of Translated Law. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang 2014. (=Studies in Language, Culture and Society, Volume 2).","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen)","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Centre for International Governance Innovation","funders":"China Postdoctoral Science Foundation","keywords":"Volume (thermodynamics); Sociology; Media studies; Law and economics; Physics","score_opus":0.07244303586737372,"score_gpt":0.3605769821235284,"score_spread":0.2881339462561547,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412264572","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00005255015,0.9700767,0.0000798021,0.015430583,0.012142934,0.000013657231,0.00012156815,0.000014403782,0.0020678993],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0013450421,0.9563546,0.0002073945,0.022065982,0.011885571,0.000063216234,0.0002385055,0.00003794955,0.0078018014],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99876285,0.00034774176,0.00018624248,0.00014721477,0.00049119676,0.00006479084],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99132967,0.0052197636,0.0008409602,0.00012243725,0.002164381,0.00032279736],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019006369,0.001294381,0.0024975794,0.00686832,0.00077328616,0.0032801102,0.001638158,0.0029535168,0.020734994],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014368168,0.00064261595,0.0007543884,0.008335436,0.0016983456,0.003606318,0.0015791564,0.0035204429,0.010577153],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000030102556,0.000006863165,0.000048300764,0.008055839,0.00004003396,0.00006352856,0.00008917689,0.00003114567,0.000056318462,0.00077731704,0.92728424,0.063517146],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021437208,0.000019493258,0.0005848413,0.01804318,0.0000796811,0.000570547,0.0001195944,0.000017531229,0.000060914776,0.0007167491,0.9797459,0.000020228339],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005643054,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.015385923,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020734994,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002293191,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0046986532,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06936544},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412270705","doi":"","title":"Book review: A Game of Chinese Chess. Kun Fan “Arbitration in China: A Legal and Cultural Analysis” Oxford, 2013. 366 s.","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen)","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Centre for International Governance Innovation","funders":"","keywords":"Arbitration; China; Advertising; History; Media studies; Political science; Law; Sociology; Business","score_opus":0.01621905281576614,"score_gpt":0.29930246002910954,"score_spread":0.2830834072133434,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412270705","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00033433546,0.9171738,0.00013923492,0.04519386,0.015002902,0.000027696153,0.0004267591,0.00003345812,0.021668049],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.011269318,0.83271897,0.00034883677,0.030427441,0.016677849,0.000104843035,0.00097948,0.00009311727,0.10738007],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99929965,0.00015488704,0.000054710636,0.0000919843,0.000321383,0.00007739682],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99796873,0.00091687316,0.00012900344,0.000039723065,0.0007750289,0.00017056962],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0010212302,0.0014878481,0.0011206629,0.0048411856,0.0015570763,0.0027827413,0.0018753132,0.0030111135,0.03254938],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0039415937,0.0005125341,0.00050175627,0.007821319,0.0016517248,0.0032613068,0.0009955519,0.0027858962,0.0075886166],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012566898,0.000007653794,0.00006891246,0.00048430767,0.000007989827,0.000020874091,0.000046676727,0.000054592692,0.000019132685,0.002378911,0.970227,0.026671272],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015224152,0.000017992386,0.0012918629,0.0011423626,0.000013341549,0.00006793657,0.00011019455,0.000072061506,0.00005434018,0.0017459512,0.9954548,0.000013864048],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.071072474,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.20028311,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.071072474,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006666762,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008614961,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.14131755},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412551459","doi":"10.1080/20403313.2024.2402641","title":"Form, function, and property in <i>Bound by Convention</i>","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Jurisprudence","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Convention; Property (philosophy); Function (biology); Law and economics; Law; Political science; Sociology; Philosophy; Biology; Epistemology; Cell biology","score_opus":0.008798589737944564,"score_gpt":0.2900367113578773,"score_spread":0.2812381216199327,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412551459","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0030017197,0.7999047,0.01151292,0.10835695,0.007228697,0.0000096512895,0.00003965952,0.0000379182,0.06990779],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.20542793,0.66286314,0.00998218,0.072751105,0.022620697,0.00010710168,0.00016569291,0.00017724352,0.025905],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9970393,0.0015755724,0.00015727027,0.00043958065,0.0005564152,0.00023197202],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99567527,0.003399148,0.0002760965,0.00023421014,0.0002893386,0.0001259523],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0041869334,0.00053826644,0.00094763975,0.0013155751,0.0020311775,0.0057798736,0.0019227838,0.003945624,0.0036819042],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005898001,0.0002448642,0.00072947866,0.0025247976,0.030299786,0.013308621,0.003138578,0.00830549,0.0007168347],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007071373,0.0000047599983,0.00007270854,0.00020909618,0.0000063808666,0.000043124957,0.00075291505,0.00006936336,0.000056743105,0.97580546,0.009517646,0.013454772],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000035674866,0.000024664841,0.00037730066,0.000755425,0.000007630632,0.00021633653,0.00067792076,0.00013932442,0.0001545716,0.69105834,0.30656505,0.000019891146],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036424065,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0041501382,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0057798736,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0031736903,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025685374,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.023026884},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412638469","doi":"10.1080/20403313.2025.2535809","title":"Elucidating Law","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Jurisprudence","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science; Law and economics; Economics","score_opus":0.010975571518249199,"score_gpt":0.36734181345539907,"score_spread":0.3563662419371499,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412638469","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01927737,0.03773184,0.3346178,0.26017913,0.0043941145,0.00020368195,0.00034055373,0.00041185634,0.34284368],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6972786,0.030076016,0.19824404,0.032577794,0.0035029228,0.000510639,0.00053181115,0.00034520932,0.03693299],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9933775,0.0037189622,0.00031840595,0.0010435275,0.0011136322,0.0004279985],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9881832,0.007923072,0.00074793375,0.0018008254,0.0010801703,0.00026488767],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0146358535,0.0011108948,0.0014980186,0.002838462,0.006101522,0.010776569,0.0035978633,0.007000917,0.00884891],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021752993,0.0005975062,0.00090283324,0.0014317,0.048204742,0.025490385,0.007777389,0.010582555,0.0021792266],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000015647868,0.0000040147725,0.000048302707,0.000037620444,0.0000020935624,0.000019547462,0.0005547617,0.00012243782,0.00005191369,0.9953832,0.0013236394,0.0024508333],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000020052153,0.0000040000887,0.00003432532,0.00008944203,0.0000020822126,0.0000230906,0.00053244235,0.0002812984,0.00008619613,0.9685897,0.030351857,0.000003539019],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003424235,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0027180018,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0146358535,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0055586584,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008825196,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07740265},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412733033","doi":"10.38131/kpilj.2025.6.31.1.259","title":"Recognition and Enforcement of Korean Judgments in Foreign Courts - Practical Cases in the United States, Canada, and Australia -","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Korea Private International Law Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Enforcement; Political science; Psychology; Law; Criminology","score_opus":0.0629483475204991,"score_gpt":0.3496436952614157,"score_spread":0.2866953477409166,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412733033","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8750789,0.00084588357,0.0007505442,0.010903839,0.00022644324,0.00025105698,0.00013762838,0.000023673372,0.11178198],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98979133,0.00015380808,0.00022760865,0.0011282499,0.000013123805,0.000026424084,0.000030664054,0.000005721436,0.008623156],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9867812,0.003523234,0.0008378028,0.0013818027,0.0024052367,0.0050707096],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97694665,0.008349229,0.002030286,0.001260381,0.00816171,0.003251779],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013528668,0.0003120661,0.00048594168,0.0012059573,0.01602723,0.008766118,0.0017716222,0.0037685689,0.0052234572],"category_scores_gemma":[0.044899385,0.00039321667,0.0005107136,0.0017373718,0.0065550734,0.0027300124,0.003707054,0.004336741,0.00058148586],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00092410855,0.00092813995,0.16882886,0.00039803731,0.00023286785,0.012414095,0.17492895,0.002957284,0.003506042,0.48232877,0.07206568,0.080487125],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00043806853,0.00043948586,0.18847448,0.0009444561,0.0003884414,0.002081672,0.5206929,0.008932772,0.010550377,0.036786377,0.22980915,0.0004618094],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.67235523,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.81923014,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.32764477,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.031335134,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0693276,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.65914863},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4412991010","doi":"10.1139/cjas-2024-0139","title":"Note of appreciation","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Animal Science","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Chemistry; Psychology; Biology","score_opus":0.016364977452616232,"score_gpt":0.3106706430431921,"score_spread":0.29430566559057586,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4412991010","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"editorial","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0017831316,0.006814065,0.0012769051,0.6086838,0.31917524,0.0001536148,0.0010954646,0.0005406777,0.060477126],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.023280641,0.0038056485,0.0020805488,0.40730917,0.07578278,0.00029139957,0.00043576746,0.0004987829,0.4865153],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99586785,0.00062342425,0.00029861662,0.000617311,0.0021992973,0.0003935423],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.96441954,0.006059693,0.0014254479,0.0013191054,0.021434281,0.005341934],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0029452469,0.00084851246,0.0015476944,0.0009905042,0.0030896685,0.004322962,0.0023945223,0.006027246,0.054843936],"category_scores_gemma":[0.056792594,0.00044964833,0.00096162787,0.00062836404,0.0014289308,0.002383814,0.0035039664,0.017013963,0.035792187],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017872722,0.0000059612544,0.00019839048,0.00003653961,0.000005998517,0.00033703292,0.00016208937,0.000021207004,0.00025072377,0.0017564576,0.9904897,0.0067179506],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006989241,0.0000101688975,0.00079767744,0.000103435304,0.0000058130972,0.00072737766,0.00046401357,0.00010002545,0.000112477086,0.0011693825,0.9964805,0.000022166052],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015556436,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03888662,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.054843936,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0022673924,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0061252243,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1834712},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413026716","doi":"10.1017/9781009340267.006","title":"Liverpool 1974","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Guelph","funders":"","keywords":"History","score_opus":0.022806537720165956,"score_gpt":0.23393086826131518,"score_spread":0.2111243305411492,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413026716","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000440854,0.008730583,0.00024448577,0.0014829362,0.0012323842,0.000016644908,0.00037001524,0.00008073918,0.9874013],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0014620379,0.0011202057,0.00006320781,0.00019208778,0.000054359614,0.000006956955,0.00006903227,0.000031663654,0.9970005],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99981636,0.00002433667,0.000008126181,0.000052088584,0.00006830591,0.000030813146],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99987125,0.000021660591,0.000008703743,0.000017121314,0.00004968861,0.000031505937],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00017463056,0.0007136345,0.00028881236,0.0010091311,0.0021109038,0.0028673427,0.00047287787,0.0009916811,0.37663805],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005828003,0.00031762352,0.00018825044,0.0013238607,0.0010645894,0.0019084077,0.0015903679,0.0014164223,0.16441485],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020070354,0.00000783177,0.00010039035,0.000095811505,0.0000013591183,0.00012263282,0.00067835196,0.000050771676,0.00015911798,0.040686946,0.8950107,0.06306602],"study_design_scores_gemma":[7.0405446e-7,0.0000024833869,0.00012001261,0.000045955698,2.576475e-7,0.000030220222,0.00008110066,0.0000059711683,0.000020827756,0.0006231864,0.9990682,0.0000010169333],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.018224664,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.086437225,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.37663805,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025089968,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001347993,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.88915014},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413131219","doi":"10.1017/cyl.2025.10023","title":"Canadian Cases in Private International Law in 2024","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Yearbook of international Law/Annuaire canadien de droit international","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Thompson Rivers University","funders":"","keywords":"Content (measure theory); Law; Action (physics); Business; Political science; Mathematics; Physics","score_opus":0.008136756780978237,"score_gpt":0.2669299365593608,"score_spread":0.25879317977838256,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413131219","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04304112,0.008131833,0.00045344082,0.06262484,0.0015459965,0.0001380284,0.0042575663,0.00014449932,0.87966263],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4378851,0.0049087834,0.0009239855,0.03426608,0.0003837669,0.00012868366,0.0017407903,0.0001211899,0.51964164],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9916359,0.00037033894,0.00013361924,0.00041102452,0.0030728027,0.0043762974],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9956318,0.00058960397,0.00020958499,0.00025867656,0.0018093969,0.0015008799],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026531718,0.0004916832,0.0005066847,0.0030415258,0.023575837,0.008129644,0.0024162026,0.0080840355,0.023764556],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010257835,0.0007780634,0.00074043893,0.0059722825,0.0047352724,0.0021953157,0.003865897,0.006007002,0.0018218585],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005100422,0.00004422985,0.0036370414,0.00008801435,0.000024404157,0.0007673908,0.0045530987,0.0003457221,0.00018618551,0.4458235,0.52750355,0.016975818],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000034745226,0.000012221115,0.020479366,0.00019860594,0.00004422699,0.00023269818,0.0054555,0.0004910704,0.00033596533,0.009563772,0.96306473,0.00008713882],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9950736,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9980354,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1589415,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1589415,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.16919139,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.97550863},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413186588","doi":"10.32920/29896169","title":"Is It Time to Regulate Collaborative Practice?","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Business; Process management; Computer science; Knowledge management","score_opus":0.029264642588121653,"score_gpt":0.39063425734414,"score_spread":0.3613696147560183,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413186588","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008991001,0.00561899,0.018797092,0.8502668,0.0048411684,0.00009499804,0.0000695415,0.00020371487,0.11111673],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.66804016,0.005156208,0.014271264,0.26752907,0.0051236753,0.0010179606,0.00015506007,0.0005168102,0.038189773],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.96101063,0.018581951,0.0014874453,0.0049643726,0.0069717458,0.0069838227],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.91021776,0.035661977,0.010097998,0.009133779,0.015748184,0.019140195],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.042926785,0.00046322134,0.0010472279,0.0012399625,0.013380733,0.022767833,0.004431543,0.016084783,0.016111195],"category_scores_gemma":[0.092259794,0.00064570125,0.0012255878,0.0015262935,0.06696628,0.0346356,0.011075789,0.02123341,0.0047396473],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036545265,0.000089582936,0.00085690524,0.00014825245,0.000023582621,0.00012436316,0.023191074,0.00013718619,0.00030899936,0.90874785,0.042250186,0.024085458],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007757229,0.000081236474,0.0011832046,0.0010101662,0.000029588198,0.00012786532,0.035971995,0.00030368924,0.00045526528,0.53994644,0.42071688,0.0000960204],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.021405958,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.016494278,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.042926785,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015447017,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0384846,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22702128},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4413405698","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780190879679.001.0001","title":"American Law in a Global Context","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Political science; Law; Law and economics; History; Sociology; Archaeology","score_opus":0.01404078272785415,"score_gpt":0.31849943873650766,"score_spread":0.3044586560086535,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4413405698","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009502498,0.017807327,0.0005645628,0.040353097,0.00453777,0.000011111622,0.00011437582,0.000069169575,0.9270401],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.541339,0.037450027,0.0018428512,0.05727891,0.0089355465,0.00008772471,0.0005016127,0.00026713108,0.35229725],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993749,0.00022101123,0.000012886731,0.00009910737,0.00017186799,0.00012019885],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99950695,0.00014104717,0.0000338548,0.00005091532,0.00012735528,0.00013985854],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00051742507,0.00041940776,0.00028761785,0.001358011,0.004028301,0.00837789,0.00040450462,0.0015891502,0.019796712],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009002738,0.00012158188,0.00015445761,0.0027818878,0.005094508,0.0046862573,0.002517842,0.004300182,0.0021184685],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005660975,0.000040418432,0.0010234697,0.000057042842,0.0000045711913,0.0002040207,0.0057842513,0.00014000571,0.00017236227,0.5890559,0.3672685,0.036243778],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000001042418,0.0000048854886,0.0010947954,0.00014280554,0.000002207624,0.00008308004,0.0030888475,0.000059184335,0.000026729007,0.026516316,0.9689765,0.00000343584],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008508639,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018258862,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019796712,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00371822,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0024358737,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06622654},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414118994","doi":"10.37381/6bksdp60","title":"Book Review: Mixed Jurisdictions Worldwide: The Third Legal Family, by Vernon Valentine Palmer","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Tulane European and Civil Law Forum","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Work (physics); Legislation; Subject (documents)","score_opus":0.007211965514747228,"score_gpt":0.24020845802683788,"score_spread":0.23299649251209065,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414118994","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000055372977,0.92211294,0.00008134644,0.047479544,0.019970147,0.000009052511,0.00006740584,0.000012215234,0.010212073],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0014181889,0.8947065,0.00011865192,0.045185346,0.025985124,0.00005572412,0.00015003301,0.000033807057,0.032346644],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9991208,0.00021953408,0.00006105172,0.00013705311,0.00037991317,0.000081568396],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99732924,0.0015591437,0.00018721957,0.00007915417,0.0005823294,0.0002628805],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011078882,0.001082983,0.0013091997,0.0028827775,0.0016177585,0.004699822,0.0018906065,0.0052845385,0.019720353],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0060330904,0.000671091,0.0005215766,0.0050163213,0.0031062725,0.006545234,0.0022705216,0.007938554,0.009372647],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000035392247,0.000004592882,0.000033176308,0.00032163083,0.0000031600723,0.000023989776,0.00005636456,0.00002409819,0.000008601379,0.0024118058,0.9766148,0.020494366],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004465122,0.0000048748066,0.00022684295,0.0015540061,0.0000032350129,0.0002043136,0.00008882831,0.000010101556,0.0000052487912,0.0014016225,0.9964909,0.0000054183297],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.020291576,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.042640086,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.020291576,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0042944797,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00690158,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.065971136},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414119062","doi":"10.37381/p1jhme57","title":"Civil Liability in a Mixed Jurisdiction: Quebec and the Network of Ratio Communis","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Tulane European and Civil Law Forum","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Liability; Legal liability; Legislation; Government (linguistics); Civil rights","score_opus":0.007974544654062023,"score_gpt":0.22826010192935264,"score_spread":0.22028555727529062,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414119062","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.32953435,0.014821642,0.0025820737,0.053780675,0.00022165754,0.000091765345,0.0005090935,0.000033873326,0.598425],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9740879,0.0009299469,0.00030527762,0.001075405,0.00003062362,0.000017381997,0.000051578132,0.000004604967,0.023497341],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99811757,0.00046211274,0.000030259554,0.00019900315,0.00041849058,0.0007726462],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99811906,0.00044090208,0.00019191415,0.00009087403,0.0007627643,0.00039443228],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012545903,0.00021538947,0.00029640607,0.001910025,0.011768622,0.0061786645,0.0013809043,0.0025403895,0.014085305],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0038633966,0.00017417193,0.00021683972,0.0028806578,0.01050735,0.0037200097,0.0021990645,0.0019020276,0.00035077584],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023482595,0.000016402344,0.0058846627,0.00002452401,0.000008836038,0.00034264766,0.0051274933,0.00067229854,0.000056366367,0.97285897,0.007717911,0.0072664046],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00011973292,0.0000953154,0.10964688,0.000721726,0.000083678126,0.00084189826,0.051088724,0.010888141,0.00030809088,0.43117672,0.3948852,0.00014382481],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97469383,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9837208,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.059439093,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.059439093,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03052113,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.43126285},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414582886","doi":"10.21608/jlr.2025.385720.1742","title":"Nationality of Children Born Through Surrogacy Abroad: A Conflict of Laws Perspective / جنسية الأطفال المولودين عبر الأم البديلة في الخارج منظور في تنازع القوانين","year":2025,"lang":"ar","type":"article","venue":"مجلة البحوث الفقهية والقانونية","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nationality; Legislature; Statelessness; Conflict of laws; Human rights; Sovereignty; Perspective (graphical); Foreign national","score_opus":0.026535816613431996,"score_gpt":0.3773307367666614,"score_spread":0.3507949201532294,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414582886","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.5675587,0.0077347206,0.00337644,0.038703404,0.00026901695,0.00006546198,0.00009319396,0.000006841863,0.38219216],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9878627,0.0026674564,0.0006463219,0.001535734,0.000035740904,0.000032739692,0.000030987063,0.0000063021503,0.0071819783],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99530005,0.0025301918,0.00021101828,0.00040703514,0.0007059695,0.00084560714],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9953998,0.002647271,0.0010527767,0.00018996057,0.00034962496,0.00036071203],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005760828,0.00017145592,0.0003482862,0.001045217,0.006429159,0.0071479212,0.0010063684,0.0022119472,0.005219643],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008810393,0.00022317366,0.0004116726,0.001026858,0.014704822,0.0043238667,0.0052699656,0.0036446222,0.00018848179],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000142215595,0.00004430364,0.017874002,0.0000568492,0.000009435525,0.0015509208,0.10355283,0.00012578804,0.0001607608,0.8614531,0.0014239176,0.013733943],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000014652831,0.00009188648,0.042816762,0.0020853044,0.000056231147,0.0048890873,0.5887773,0.00069883466,0.0012388409,0.1600489,0.19921477,0.000067456334],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01235563,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.025417043,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01235563,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0070440536,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006597624,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05110836},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4414848184","doi":"10.1017/s0922156525100526","title":"Post-jurisdiction (The erosion of jurisdiction doctrine)","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Leiden Journal of International Law","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Territoriality; International law; Subject-matter jurisdiction; Doctrine; Exclusive jurisdiction; Human rights; Federal jurisdiction; Criminal jurisdiction","score_opus":0.010672265236716974,"score_gpt":0.30807002222453217,"score_spread":0.2973977569878152,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4414848184","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.17206845,0.004159789,0.09264899,0.020125806,0.00051735673,0.00009209948,0.00014083568,0.00016096921,0.7100857],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9855342,0.0002333096,0.0024848813,0.002120328,0.00017482565,0.00005021264,0.000029010176,0.000025886206,0.0093473345],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99134934,0.002742014,0.00044950738,0.0020021764,0.00209586,0.0013610522],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98937815,0.0038901065,0.0009184526,0.0026782693,0.0025442634,0.0005907854],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00867508,0.0002110134,0.0005401356,0.0009954509,0.0036832446,0.0059089763,0.0020208498,0.0041012084,0.0052828575],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013512399,0.00034139186,0.0007614183,0.0009357642,0.033320755,0.0076351217,0.0073942207,0.00866505,0.00077857595],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003981227,0.0000029962252,0.00015995251,0.0000067389356,0.0000022503611,0.000038589787,0.0007888058,0.00006392224,0.00007047687,0.99693537,0.0005008869,0.0014260369],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018044431,0.000037354428,0.0008977221,0.00009830597,0.0000147826095,0.00024239547,0.0006616683,0.0008184379,0.00035878157,0.95721245,0.03961779,0.00002236708],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004504739,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0030032534,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00867508,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003475293,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0037919418,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.045878768},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4417001220","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.5812702","title":"Recoding Family Law: Toward a Theory of Relationships of Economic and Emotional Interdependency in the Civil Code of Québec","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"preprint","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Interdependence; Normative; Civil code; Code (set theory); Conceptual framework; Family law","score_opus":0.0425876866076393,"score_gpt":0.3081006798319529,"score_spread":0.2655129932243136,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4417001220","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.6565097,0.002216577,0.048457507,0.035627935,0.00015823638,0.00013149845,0.0009885889,0.0000848754,0.25582507],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99402976,0.00022831597,0.0017382812,0.00022184843,0.000012090256,0.000017214179,0.00006549578,0.000011190406,0.0036757796],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9987212,0.0007038926,0.000025692609,0.00012587002,0.00014093399,0.00028238958],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9955481,0.0017282023,0.0005436425,0.00026737386,0.001560502,0.0003521485],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001675786,0.00036710032,0.0002898556,0.002857515,0.004931977,0.006588935,0.0017870485,0.0014889934,0.00746183],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009353155,0.0001964801,0.000338957,0.0036631012,0.008502796,0.0048056142,0.0016908941,0.0015890395,0.00020009339],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016583652,0.000049217342,0.049275253,0.000033660723,0.000019163872,0.00025376666,0.04187161,0.0041815555,0.00016341898,0.8780956,0.0042470857,0.021793101],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000022966267,0.000048335816,0.18668507,0.00043056847,0.00006494817,0.00028367492,0.1729665,0.050386995,0.00037872465,0.52322286,0.06539875,0.00011062522],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9274985,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9066857,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07250148,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.034760192,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02809866,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.252204},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W4417288444","doi":"10.1017/9781108966221.006","title":"Processes of Legalisation in Transnational Litigation","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Work (physics); Globalization; Legislation","score_opus":0.02670998176512969,"score_gpt":0.23903912354345927,"score_spread":0.21232914177832957,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W4417288444","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.022055779,0.010713672,0.021627253,0.014627489,0.0004448314,0.000131266,0.000042913718,0.00007802267,0.9302787],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.82211065,0.010282009,0.0128176315,0.0053627077,0.0006524685,0.0004928525,0.00013870912,0.00016412593,0.14797887],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98258704,0.009082106,0.00073644693,0.0018138774,0.0038966236,0.001883904],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9897569,0.007074946,0.0006859092,0.0013087479,0.00080282724,0.00037076167],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015815191,0.0005155519,0.00064974895,0.0036522734,0.009479255,0.024014289,0.0029010826,0.008801099,0.010816234],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020113427,0.0006287085,0.00086705474,0.0047238204,0.0461452,0.021132283,0.019609103,0.010679919,0.002137546],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000010173609,0.000006061244,0.000038060287,0.0000093851795,6.8633165e-7,0.00006113885,0.0039259545,0.000056644698,0.000030995514,0.99217176,0.0007659723,0.002932279],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007408728,0.000013215649,0.00028168672,0.0003324054,0.000003666516,0.00024170765,0.007090771,0.000537665,0.00018150762,0.85638124,0.13491274,0.00001598589],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006816113,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004659307,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024014289,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.013971027,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00852433,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.101367414},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W45745707","doi":"","title":"Improved Knight Coverings.","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ars Combinatoria","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Knight; Mathematics; Physics","score_opus":0.011955711676823159,"score_gpt":0.26542991653165043,"score_spread":0.2534742048548273,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W45745707","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.10406204,0.0019203924,0.40558273,0.0024160715,0.0010987644,0.00026672625,0.003733437,0.0028842448,0.47803566],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.65790343,0.0017586965,0.1926807,0.0010812366,0.000526083,0.0002669005,0.0048727887,0.0015162068,0.13939399],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99878687,0.0002955322,0.00007632924,0.00025602806,0.0002959742,0.00028931128],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978028,0.0008750381,0.00015447386,0.00073514396,0.00021973389,0.00021279087],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0008769755,0.0009140879,0.0012676911,0.0016894017,0.0027799795,0.0036432666,0.0014868227,0.001093569,0.034014408],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005131732,0.00059854524,0.0015211963,0.0029816492,0.0016124984,0.0054488536,0.0035884755,0.002595286,0.0065723984],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00010187828,0.000079687765,0.0005611584,0.00018868831,0.000052939868,0.00014808396,0.0003623863,0.008605389,0.0011066839,0.8715401,0.0363289,0.08092411],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000034569453,0.000026904134,0.00044169548,0.000052781135,0.000049278948,0.00025861402,0.00018843732,0.016577061,0.0012732507,0.91189295,0.069181666,0.000022834722],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0032655925,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0059093433,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.034014408,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018205903,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0010239244,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1137895},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W46635493","doi":"10.29173/alr58","title":"Same-Sex Marriages in Canadian Private International Law","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Alberta Law Review","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Spouse; Law; Parliament; Residence; Government (linguistics); Conflict of laws; Jurisdiction; Family law; Position (finance); Political science; Politics; Marriage law; Choice of law; Sociology; Economics","score_opus":0.01688912670945522,"score_gpt":0.30087814510298344,"score_spread":0.2839890183935282,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W46635493","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.05479292,0.18073305,0.00074899866,0.09640609,0.0017670627,0.00012932245,0.00090649974,0.00005979869,0.6644563],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7347817,0.15287173,0.0012433607,0.045886867,0.0008585704,0.00007895357,0.00090578006,0.00005216138,0.06332081],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9925209,0.0006525136,0.00019292276,0.0005061795,0.0040436727,0.0020837528],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9926111,0.001359167,0.0004466449,0.00029820003,0.0044852924,0.00079962],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0042878436,0.00034494742,0.00050296675,0.0046290634,0.016133849,0.0071196184,0.0023028848,0.0038062024,0.005598227],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011333736,0.00042204314,0.00042912687,0.0065252194,0.009616929,0.0018121386,0.0020267447,0.0035204398,0.00027990338],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018429737,0.000041325813,0.0038364506,0.00038236956,0.000032988304,0.0003197164,0.0069232476,0.0005338795,0.00019743816,0.7846647,0.14677638,0.056273058],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023547047,0.00001749791,0.026591923,0.0009897207,0.0000741146,0.00018081431,0.0067248903,0.0003218102,0.0001807214,0.019688016,0.9451258,0.000081041886],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99134314,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99535,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.111292556,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.111292556,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.20893729,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8074878},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W566814400","doi":"10.1017/cbo9781139034937","title":"Foreign Relations Law","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Public law; Political science; Comparative law; Municipal law; Jurisdiction; Public international law; Foreign relations; International law; Private law; Foreign policy; Politics","score_opus":0.021979728799054007,"score_gpt":0.22939872526748697,"score_spread":0.20741899646843298,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W566814400","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00060410245,0.0073713143,0.00085822615,0.0036502972,0.00043911394,0.000015630987,0.000052352083,0.000028580296,0.9869805],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.061706472,0.011063726,0.0011802561,0.00476169,0.00081275206,0.000072532086,0.00021209629,0.00009476672,0.9200958],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992361,0.00020798475,0.000026787993,0.00013162708,0.00027819545,0.000119375916],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995938,0.00016587072,0.000027981661,0.00007505998,0.00010648516,0.000030782998],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00082927034,0.0004319501,0.00033402245,0.001221649,0.002842238,0.0072246427,0.0006779156,0.0025160129,0.0283481],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002390398,0.00022178698,0.00028019922,0.0017002634,0.0060045714,0.005120279,0.0017115574,0.0030174702,0.008354036],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000016356329,0.0000048086395,0.000038188336,0.00002025382,8.9966636e-7,0.000022574393,0.0008310043,0.0000671299,0.000034829587,0.9397786,0.04608001,0.013119965],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000018400757,0.000004135301,0.00013546753,0.0001932457,0.0000015620839,0.000055832425,0.00053201366,0.00010160342,0.00005973316,0.13804512,0.8608659,0.0000036322413],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.014455528,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.010756345,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0283481,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0058848895,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00328286,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09483379},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W577616740","doi":"","title":"Modern Chinese Legal Reform: New Perspectives","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Ontario Tech University","funders":"","keywords":"Democratization; Political science; Politics; Legal realism; Law; China; Civil liberties; Context (archaeology); Legal research; Public administration; Democracy; Sociology; Geography","score_opus":0.0143000140724539,"score_gpt":0.2934767265924045,"score_spread":0.2791767125199506,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W577616740","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.025737762,0.12745064,0.0018104224,0.121837005,0.002432018,0.00004168538,0.00007880617,0.000055973098,0.7205558],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6504643,0.13995618,0.0014767987,0.017711993,0.008900004,0.00016146085,0.00012398727,0.00004687191,0.18115847],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993923,0.00021254426,0.00001830036,0.000050633156,0.00019190057,0.00013429641],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997124,0.00010756321,0.000027079388,0.00003633655,0.000070056165,0.000046574805],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013630248,0.00048337126,0.0003611782,0.002872158,0.004033221,0.004399603,0.0009019674,0.0016735729,0.0050224983],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0011334858,0.00016357728,0.00027544794,0.0041506737,0.015874842,0.005191328,0.0016586367,0.0025863748,0.00033032682],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004750484,0.000011653364,0.00021844737,0.00009311385,0.0000029849132,0.000079267666,0.007082391,0.00019620002,0.000041955933,0.9553769,0.020626646,0.016265709],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015990852,0.000019603413,0.0028613317,0.00036152825,0.000013998441,0.000112754446,0.008104331,0.001003798,0.00015269562,0.29284126,0.6944939,0.000018763665],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.049920227,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06416117,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.049920227,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02287016,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011452498,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1659354},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W58397629","doi":"10.21991/c9pm3h","title":"RIGHTS BROUGHT HOME: THE UNITED KINGDOM ADOPTS A \"CHARTER OF RIGHTS\"","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Constitutional Forum / Forum constitutionnel","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Kingdom; Law; Political science; Human rights; Public administration","score_opus":0.05191623041426489,"score_gpt":0.2862027304870549,"score_spread":0.23428650007279003,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W58397629","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.021198997,0.010582104,0.022685677,0.20789742,0.014767236,0.0006041436,0.0011270645,0.00047777608,0.7206596],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4422925,0.004685853,0.040457558,0.17309244,0.0050953277,0.0012893718,0.00073312846,0.0006680273,0.3316858],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.93704975,0.022453316,0.006666489,0.0069408068,0.016228585,0.010661043],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9691733,0.010763524,0.002674312,0.0044882325,0.010897783,0.002002821],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.025199138,0.0012207493,0.0018045659,0.0021221563,0.012266081,0.034523092,0.00470154,0.039626498,0.0054765367],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04654556,0.0017895817,0.0021332288,0.0028026148,0.028820401,0.011686178,0.0084957965,0.038175322,0.0023201152],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020738562,0.000013185074,0.00011036117,0.0000616352,0.000012199434,0.00009860451,0.0019260928,0.00012303662,0.00014357109,0.95368844,0.041064855,0.0027374057],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000121051664,0.00007296461,0.0023183455,0.0008169297,0.00008406221,0.00027769658,0.0016911639,0.00048973353,0.0007580101,0.14643653,0.8466387,0.00029481231],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.24711357,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.24185096,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24711357,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.018043451,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.045708206,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.49135047},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W587900359","doi":"10.4324/9781315874067-7","title":"Equality in Asia-Pacific : reality or a contradiction in terms?","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Routledge eBooks","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Contradiction; Gender studies; China; Sociology; Constitutionalism; Political science; Colonialism; Human sexuality; Sexual orientation; Law; Democracy; Politics","score_opus":0.07307751012844488,"score_gpt":0.335448266776132,"score_spread":0.2623707566476871,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W587900359","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005016064,0.20110793,0.0015508601,0.066592,0.005196191,0.00003954139,0.000078356345,0.00004368947,0.7203754],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.278296,0.3052822,0.0035555786,0.028492691,0.0076884977,0.00019915518,0.00031947685,0.00020512883,0.3759613],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99920183,0.00031958416,0.00003301034,0.00009341506,0.00024897594,0.00010326229],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99941003,0.00028083083,0.00004677716,0.000046819732,0.00011315275,0.000102340586],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001212533,0.00058113434,0.00044004546,0.0011825784,0.0032320498,0.0074752616,0.000884944,0.0013406153,0.007419062],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0016177847,0.00022135202,0.00020823126,0.003974053,0.016112745,0.008766238,0.0035668246,0.004717709,0.0010234573],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006837483,0.000020252513,0.00039818877,0.00028972467,0.000004826813,0.00017901909,0.031874612,0.000084972,0.00006594291,0.74005854,0.1648526,0.062164422],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000028444222,0.000011231191,0.0012184526,0.0009778024,0.000004535415,0.00017730155,0.017936554,0.000065426764,0.00004681529,0.098418474,0.8811334,0.0000073028964],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013892616,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.018098712,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.013892616,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0044632284,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0060381563,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.032383144},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W588571081","doi":"","title":"紹介 Marvin Baer, Joost Blom, Elizabeth Edinger, Nicholas Rafferty, Genevieve Saumier, Catherine Walsh, Private International Law in Common Law Canada, Cases, Text, and Materials","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"国際法外交雑誌","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Common law; Sociology; Political science","score_opus":0.015955949474760332,"score_gpt":0.28266990381534635,"score_spread":0.26671395434058603,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W588571081","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0044400697,0.011179859,0.0022727377,0.3966651,0.014179066,0.0005842816,0.0048516267,0.0003367563,0.56549054],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.032543957,0.00932328,0.0030950168,0.069865815,0.0027718544,0.00058765727,0.0016352,0.00021351846,0.87996376],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961067,0.0005120502,0.00017393011,0.00024272552,0.0024065147,0.0005580283],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9853262,0.0073171486,0.00045312807,0.0005365256,0.0054958956,0.00087119726],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0038958257,0.00049486617,0.00043172613,0.0031965293,0.011268167,0.0058417385,0.003674565,0.0075880024,0.06345779],"category_scores_gemma":[0.032582432,0.00092582975,0.00052021374,0.0035936725,0.0028348998,0.0050729276,0.0015682299,0.005635404,0.017959101],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007315522,0.000011713873,0.00014372061,0.000038817278,0.0000012148698,0.000043699332,0.000426767,0.000037469028,0.00004208664,0.032835357,0.9599943,0.006417499],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012959244,0.000012042489,0.0017981854,0.00024797273,0.000007754067,0.00005687138,0.0018350561,0.00010901195,0.00030704355,0.010329553,0.9852507,0.00003279713],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.53018546,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7637658,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.46981454,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012034419,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01875431,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9451628},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W59419847","doi":"","title":"Diffusion and Globalization Discourse","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Harvard international law journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Globalization; Metaphor; Jurisprudence; Metropolitan area; Power (physics); Movement (music); Diffusion; Sociology; Political science; Law; Aesthetics; History; Political economy; Philosophy; Linguistics; Physics","score_opus":0.008859628905455608,"score_gpt":0.2931288734744705,"score_spread":0.28426924456901487,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W59419847","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0036059758,0.011034865,0.00067541254,0.057904605,0.0005555492,0.000024639809,0.00021969414,0.000047747933,0.9259315],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.48031268,0.034361545,0.0024085036,0.0389975,0.0027682248,0.00038214566,0.0006674623,0.00036907304,0.43973288],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9981558,0.00092723215,0.00006937628,0.00025827988,0.0003830679,0.00020631791],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99899274,0.0006171118,0.00009760612,0.000102731836,0.000101236976,0.0000885744],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023156935,0.0005398904,0.00045654582,0.0018518937,0.010440292,0.013637612,0.00085372507,0.0071021523,0.06586485],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0032945152,0.0002477154,0.00027313564,0.0041837376,0.014569668,0.018050449,0.005670169,0.0050524925,0.008800425],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000046450928,0.0000072906323,0.00009743258,0.00006407921,0.0000014382582,0.00006657893,0.008208379,0.000026090736,0.000045255987,0.9332323,0.050038308,0.00820823],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010642752,0.000008846963,0.00066975254,0.00047417195,0.0000040223417,0.00011394265,0.008292218,0.000118058306,0.000093368486,0.15540995,0.83479595,0.000009076805],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005791435,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0054013003,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06586485,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0062628384,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0025321746,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2203399},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W599857793","doi":"10.1093/law/9780199655724.001.0001","title":"Extraterritoriality and Collective Redress","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Redress; Class action; Jurisdiction; Punitive damages; Political science; Collective action; Law; Enforcement; Law and economics; Sociology; State (computer science)","score_opus":0.036957737461660665,"score_gpt":0.2543525045295619,"score_spread":0.2173947670679012,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W599857793","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.024109762,0.04245068,0.0049119308,0.021467948,0.00066492014,0.000026588714,0.000046984067,0.000034698365,0.9062863],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8379207,0.015929636,0.0015832444,0.0062106824,0.0013156212,0.00013474979,0.00009595224,0.00006872999,0.13674057],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98650384,0.0054241074,0.00065177766,0.0018822788,0.0034782053,0.0020599528],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.993255,0.0034108525,0.0009833907,0.0011452781,0.0009468981,0.00025852214],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007968563,0.00048597253,0.00061140937,0.0031156645,0.0063259,0.014188938,0.0021941806,0.0065940153,0.01586542],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00893152,0.00042202082,0.0007756471,0.002950125,0.029387053,0.010097538,0.0075683175,0.005370777,0.0016838851],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005790857,0.0000055420874,0.00009940397,0.000035662135,0.0000033848198,0.00004994462,0.0032933273,0.00006224731,0.000039211252,0.98637855,0.0041145785,0.005912409],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019677846,0.000059218008,0.0029994494,0.0011907893,0.000028218305,0.0003265567,0.0075897793,0.00019820072,0.00046361462,0.33809057,0.6489961,0.000037835245],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007471212,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006808302,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01586542,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009577566,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00447396,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06949049},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W610995838","doi":"10.1093/law/9780192870520.001.0001","title":"Conflict of Laws Within The Uk","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Oxford University Press eBooks","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Conflict of laws; Choice of law; Political science; Jurisdiction; Law; Public policy; Context (archaeology); Legislation; Law and economics; Sociology","score_opus":0.042054594835941234,"score_gpt":0.26716353225486456,"score_spread":0.22510893741892332,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W610995838","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0034098977,0.05967724,0.0011888854,0.019922368,0.0053240745,0.000039295952,0.00008988408,0.000045222296,0.9103031],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.30154133,0.057891432,0.0019206248,0.013252921,0.0028335473,0.00018753528,0.0003401984,0.00011003727,0.62192243],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.996666,0.0013616461,0.0002179494,0.00028821803,0.0010541481,0.00041207636],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986009,0.0007514009,0.00012873209,0.00011544159,0.00028516832,0.000118352444],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012925048,0.0004706337,0.00038042563,0.0013795301,0.0039786743,0.0079463115,0.0007501023,0.002570111,0.023069503],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0045359614,0.00024677458,0.0003144973,0.001780727,0.007227657,0.0035695576,0.0030343926,0.0023984667,0.0035757073],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009655958,0.000006987975,0.00013949958,0.00019441974,0.000003140432,0.00029409633,0.010632831,0.00018763397,0.000107506174,0.7345051,0.19735076,0.056568284],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000016345297,0.0000041940484,0.00018952924,0.0003662593,0.0000013789268,0.00015708181,0.0014676403,0.000030841024,0.000029495635,0.019264521,0.97848207,0.000005362428],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.034253456,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03851669,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.034253456,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011729573,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008831346,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08510435},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W614083899","doi":"","title":"判例から見る仲裁法(31)仲裁判断の取消しと当事者自治[Noble China inc. v. Lei, 42 O.R. (3d) 69, Ontario Court of Justice, November 4, 1988 ]","year":2007,"lang":"ja","type":"article","venue":"JCAジャーナル","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"China; Economic Justice; Political science; Law","score_opus":0.01871193973247826,"score_gpt":0.29110064006933717,"score_spread":0.2723887003368589,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W614083899","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02302015,0.001948519,0.0015130806,0.033301104,0.00076850125,0.00021221742,0.00077344436,0.00009143859,0.93837166],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.27134618,0.0018062134,0.0026334012,0.05129045,0.00054896495,0.00029789578,0.00034892108,0.000042054467,0.6716859],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9978471,0.00022696328,0.000119274795,0.00031843214,0.00079147064,0.00069669745],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988219,0.0002976067,0.00010302997,0.00006679004,0.0005778188,0.00013287537],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020016313,0.00042570214,0.00025312474,0.0007011717,0.008776474,0.004206684,0.0009519668,0.007991805,0.02106209],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003936153,0.0006789762,0.0005917983,0.0005918082,0.003838366,0.0018409272,0.001845122,0.005124957,0.007389557],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006043973,0.00005601074,0.0035797248,0.00010787779,0.000016760472,0.000818104,0.006054883,0.00019632248,0.0018822323,0.7367672,0.23524497,0.015215478],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000039519713,0.00007960303,0.008371293,0.00018585943,0.000046959067,0.00046822298,0.0023950427,0.00030770336,0.002254133,0.03830553,0.94745666,0.000089536625],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.24487625,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5300036,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.24487625,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0067673563,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010781735,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.48690188},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W614308756","doi":"10.5040/9781472562425","title":"Legal Recognition of Same-Sex Partnerships","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Bloomsbury Publishing (UK) eBooks","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":111,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Law; Political science","score_opus":0.07932982603025138,"score_gpt":0.28851568002178185,"score_spread":0.20918585399153047,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W614308756","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.001111723,0.005658727,0.0014686112,0.013512268,0.0013197405,0.000034026765,0.00003257731,0.000038034796,0.97682434],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.109522395,0.008981225,0.0030957134,0.020768272,0.0010856829,0.00022389552,0.00020921169,0.00009561398,0.85601807],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965522,0.0010043685,0.00018797776,0.00030865517,0.0015718123,0.0003750371],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980269,0.0008314728,0.00014591389,0.00025282087,0.0005685291,0.00017431143],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028551584,0.0003653024,0.000428869,0.0009756906,0.004600342,0.006871981,0.0016552135,0.0062390384,0.016541777],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006348591,0.00036942214,0.0003899275,0.0010543796,0.011212875,0.0071618324,0.0034534298,0.006761286,0.004539662],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000017340724,0.000010744609,0.00004439083,0.000027764347,4.6775702e-7,0.000054485656,0.0023912485,0.000042092088,0.00003254946,0.9093342,0.07468431,0.013376024],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003957866,0.0000073838382,0.0002544212,0.00031094727,0.0000021128637,0.00024151741,0.0013861225,0.0001406557,0.00013410764,0.14225754,0.8552495,0.000011693121],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.024379097,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03288543,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.024379097,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0063657113,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010756285,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.055337787},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W624539192","doi":"10.1017/cbo9781139031288","title":"Private International Law in Commonwealth Africa","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Cambridge University Press eBooks","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Thompson Rivers University","funders":"","keywords":"Commonwealth; Sierra leone; Tanzania; Political science; Law; Jurisdiction; Enforcement; Conflict of laws; Statute; Public administration; Sociology; Socioeconomics","score_opus":0.028602177614038965,"score_gpt":0.24441534635285966,"score_spread":0.2158131687388207,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W624539192","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.019451473,0.045086563,0.0008731339,0.007320041,0.00036532411,0.000043001797,0.000049427217,0.000031131316,0.92678],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5505519,0.056354247,0.0010593139,0.0030092997,0.00047835664,0.0001656886,0.000104087914,0.000055036016,0.3882221],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.999141,0.00020848063,0.000026620983,0.00007438422,0.00024820314,0.00030121757],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99957496,0.00020341057,0.000053669057,0.000044426262,0.000058718608,0.00006483987],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00053512113,0.00034929422,0.00021548869,0.0022334557,0.0056995424,0.0066279736,0.00046813034,0.0012823371,0.00814034],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00247046,0.00025348776,0.00014258786,0.0037926878,0.0066984617,0.004307375,0.0034068064,0.0016307551,0.0005874444],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000003287819,0.000010875861,0.00023377915,0.00007366929,0.0000015333525,0.00030714806,0.010537821,0.00014611469,0.0001188151,0.9361291,0.022086076,0.030351818],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003137946,0.000008946716,0.0016562337,0.0006776494,0.000002944237,0.00034920927,0.0069456208,0.00012261367,0.000089955116,0.05049481,0.9396404,0.000008426235],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.028185772,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.035429,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028185772,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006793387,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0058197365,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.056043446},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W624890805","doi":"","title":"International civil procedure","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Medical Entomology and Zoology","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Arbitration; Civil procedure; Common law; Law","score_opus":0.012521730852468356,"score_gpt":0.3096490457651945,"score_spread":0.2971273149127261,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W624890805","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00026972228,0.0058735125,0.0033964247,0.0029235892,0.004272265,0.00007588736,0.00025875762,0.00036079646,0.982569],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0049703955,0.005448301,0.0035408796,0.0023093177,0.0014144275,0.00012289028,0.00047863476,0.00031056258,0.9814045],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979937,0.0004645086,0.00014344843,0.0003275848,0.0008261022,0.00024463754],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99846894,0.0004157274,0.000109777524,0.00036021485,0.0004759423,0.00016940654],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011602709,0.001313316,0.0006260695,0.0023474211,0.0041862153,0.0073320186,0.0013543932,0.0035132791,0.19530801],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0043936856,0.00045129555,0.000738929,0.0027662157,0.0034713207,0.005070796,0.0032536215,0.005309467,0.12281709],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009449507,0.000020793645,0.00008238176,0.00009342273,0.0000019677257,0.00008024563,0.00050159235,0.0001558826,0.00016253111,0.25792298,0.676395,0.06457379],"study_design_scores_gemma":[6.5619577e-7,0.0000036386396,0.00004259329,0.000056052788,4.3110938e-7,0.000059439393,0.000073941854,0.000028739503,0.000028310727,0.0038114274,0.99589276,0.0000019529148],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0050726654,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0076072514,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19530801,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0030807399,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005077909,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6533704},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W627225013","doi":"10.82308/32239","title":"Towards a uniform conflict of laws regime in ASEAN governing international commercial transactions : uniformization of choice of law rules in contract and tort","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eScholarship@McGill (McGill)","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tort; Conflict of laws; Choice of law; Uniformization (probability theory); Law and economics; Law; Economics; Political science; Business; Mathematics; Liability","score_opus":0.030623079284877296,"score_gpt":0.29370623368739524,"score_spread":0.26308315440251795,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W627225013","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.48453584,0.0015841314,0.10053183,0.029661918,0.00019216587,0.00030959563,0.00010090909,0.000052075036,0.3830316],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9827895,0.0003461504,0.011523485,0.0010274694,0.000023660796,0.000072042974,0.000020648573,0.0000049348682,0.004191997],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9920773,0.0043937867,0.00056003494,0.00072492537,0.0015621331,0.00068177405],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9932467,0.002458494,0.0015137093,0.00078339234,0.0016407717,0.00035702033],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011875488,0.00017327315,0.00030682175,0.0012217718,0.005796912,0.0081166085,0.0009235761,0.0023952057,0.0013528682],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013828398,0.000260492,0.000330392,0.0014381771,0.01074489,0.0052445997,0.0030409808,0.0031487693,0.00015112261],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000033580707,0.00001577016,0.0012543092,0.000007820112,0.0000030113208,0.00007703348,0.0021979955,0.00073602144,0.00014474169,0.990729,0.0005608246,0.004270098],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000036152243,0.0001050138,0.017104173,0.0004938755,0.000032407468,0.0004815962,0.012762562,0.015359744,0.0012186201,0.85729575,0.09499301,0.00011706325],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.023223374,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03711637,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.023223374,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008342505,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012513894,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0628044},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W62748862","doi":"","title":"Making Long-Distance Parents Pay Up: International child-support enforcement","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Enforcement; Political science; Law; Public administration","score_opus":0.03609533812147204,"score_gpt":0.34968942484932736,"score_spread":0.3135940867278553,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W62748862","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.08965999,0.00753254,0.00240015,0.19578509,0.001701205,0.0001804528,0.00008361805,0.000089864225,0.70256716],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.79792476,0.008571375,0.0027183848,0.04883148,0.00072688004,0.00025947904,0.00019093267,0.000116790725,0.14065978],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.994722,0.0016792656,0.00022717331,0.0004954238,0.00089313736,0.001982922],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99422437,0.0013891461,0.00071363227,0.00041807015,0.00058199716,0.0026727975],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007816691,0.00031374744,0.00022804091,0.0008598333,0.010444026,0.010354706,0.0015802251,0.0042006816,0.025911968],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0136233475,0.00042257074,0.00030292373,0.001301633,0.004935343,0.0059919883,0.010838065,0.007902685,0.001354755],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008546661,0.0004841438,0.02515126,0.00013686626,0.000019060795,0.0020912322,0.051948953,0.00021833583,0.0004992548,0.43125665,0.26505768,0.2230511],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000055221488,0.00015679735,0.0234426,0.0010615644,0.000033579367,0.0007614111,0.107829794,0.00039393484,0.00068711484,0.020403847,0.84511983,0.000054234344],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.028135177,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07121003,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.028135177,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0062185777,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015270655,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08668411},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W629202107","doi":"","title":"Party autonomy in contractual and non-contractual obligations : a European and Anglo-Common Law perspective on the freedom of choice of law in the Rome I regulation on the law applicable to contractual obligations and the Rome II regulation on the law applicable to non-contractual obligations","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Choice of law; Law; Private law; Autonomy; Political science; Public law; Common law; Comparative law; Municipal law; Conflict of laws; Civil law (Civil law); Perspective (graphical)","score_opus":0.018843790704817998,"score_gpt":0.2737858430248974,"score_spread":0.2549420523200794,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W629202107","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.065854624,0.013490741,0.046563476,0.016741797,0.00037866633,0.00006514957,0.00003967418,0.000020135561,0.8568457],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9669292,0.002886886,0.005811697,0.0022023683,0.00024943124,0.000121870435,0.000035346788,0.000022387578,0.021740831],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99100935,0.0057217046,0.00029263643,0.00054252386,0.0015734493,0.00086027116],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9959674,0.0028540164,0.00031175977,0.0003734042,0.0002882207,0.00020515668],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00795666,0.0002596316,0.00036816348,0.0014105908,0.003458013,0.0069302223,0.0008207561,0.0021255487,0.0014477388],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005815293,0.00024212108,0.00055857893,0.0013907183,0.038174924,0.00670777,0.0043055876,0.003625034,0.00026094142],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000020644327,0.0000020608722,0.0000552449,0.000004546105,6.4798274e-7,0.000012321679,0.0016104836,0.00005788495,0.00001844781,0.9968002,0.00017421196,0.0012618621],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000008338579,0.000019476414,0.0013027659,0.00021883237,0.000006146384,0.00010748674,0.002856383,0.0005098023,0.00016640048,0.92646664,0.068320565,0.000017151639],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0049388357,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0045396383,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00795666,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004114278,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0046179947,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04207933},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W636401370","doi":"10.1017/cbo9780511609855","title":"The confluence of public and private international law: justice, pluralism and subsidiarity in the international constitutional ordering of private law","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Private law; Public law; Municipal law; Law; Comparative law; Political science; Subsidiarity; International law; Conflict of laws; Jurisdiction; Public international law; Commercial law; Economics; European union","score_opus":0.0317691857291862,"score_gpt":0.30128467673162795,"score_spread":0.26951549100244176,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W636401370","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.014089311,0.00923678,0.028020741,0.037543483,0.00043449644,0.000053136635,0.000038206144,0.000068404894,0.9105154],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.84645283,0.005867228,0.013666793,0.009220842,0.0011893029,0.00025089923,0.00008387697,0.00016748051,0.12310081],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99474984,0.0022059502,0.00018362427,0.0007219989,0.0015506239,0.00058810046],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964144,0.0021991595,0.00020876547,0.0005977522,0.00035533682,0.00022437608],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0048864093,0.0003333096,0.00042439482,0.0013109947,0.003959347,0.016772337,0.0008749203,0.0034777333,0.0026956713],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005056087,0.0004360319,0.0004252412,0.0016454214,0.046653688,0.012871494,0.004610992,0.007974818,0.0004890936],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000010223052,0.0000019357974,0.000021700289,0.000003825812,4.2156378e-7,0.00000903331,0.0008591172,0.000033388187,0.00002114559,0.99632746,0.00091584557,0.0018051172],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005006992,0.0000064648752,0.00016373662,0.000054217362,0.0000023489622,0.00003776145,0.00069578376,0.00024575487,0.000101454265,0.9375877,0.06109447,0.000005214224],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0061862087,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007530045,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016772337,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008162689,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0078067123,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.059224725},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W657487758","doi":"","title":"Reform and development of private international law : essays in honour of Sir Peter North","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Conflict of laws; Law; Comity; Choice of law; Jurisdiction; Political science; Private law; Convention; International law; Municipal law; Comparative law; Common law","score_opus":0.026227633712212695,"score_gpt":0.26659155891765457,"score_spread":0.24036392520544186,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W657487758","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0024471355,0.14726643,0.0022407384,0.49633187,0.0077424003,0.00003764373,0.00009546093,0.000036725734,0.34380165],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.16575427,0.16105147,0.0036919448,0.08183041,0.018809712,0.0002297171,0.00021740924,0.00017240879,0.5682426],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99829656,0.000677548,0.00006102824,0.0001664455,0.0006094365,0.00018892286],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998171,0.0009980861,0.00012178772,0.000107755826,0.0004407947,0.00016062801],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0022250821,0.0004008634,0.00033369433,0.0012732247,0.003652707,0.005599165,0.0007592913,0.0036501586,0.007153737],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0048820362,0.00032842078,0.0003281188,0.0016754008,0.010142215,0.00874228,0.0024375487,0.0047272765,0.0017276001],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000004925807,0.000019636074,0.00006636099,0.00009311324,0.0000015973967,0.00004537674,0.0029949993,0.00013611301,0.000032442098,0.5599445,0.42233643,0.014324512],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000041226963,0.0000033614474,0.0002467764,0.0003221473,0.0000013913817,0.000033165416,0.0011632766,0.000068634276,0.00002976889,0.08490694,0.9132158,0.000004556786],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.015805325,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.019372454,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.015805325,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008346949,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0051847696,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.060561597},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6899564154","doi":"10.58079/tm9e","title":"Présentation - Legal Recognition of Non-Conjugal Families: New Frontiers in Family Law in the US, Canada and Europe (20.05.2021, en ligne)","year":2021,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Industrias Culturais (Universidade de Coimbra)","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Family law; Legislation; Work (physics); Government (linguistics); Feature (linguistics)","score_opus":0.01962246327885084,"score_gpt":0.24304890453850933,"score_spread":0.2234264412596585,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6899564154","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0045219967,0.098854005,0.00039500673,0.2325526,0.13528648,0.00063872786,0.010937792,0.00044662526,0.5163668],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.022218771,0.019825576,0.00024635316,0.024780596,0.013394666,0.0002499174,0.0027756998,0.00017028814,0.9163381],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984792,0.00012661284,0.00003926811,0.00010589083,0.0006076077,0.0006413805],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99744356,0.00023124203,0.00010796398,0.000048373433,0.0011138682,0.0010549182],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021255,0.0008451049,0.0008581566,0.0020892425,0.008822168,0.008855525,0.0015937233,0.009554286,0.20485544],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003039725,0.000628849,0.0006692507,0.0025997926,0.0021292567,0.003215966,0.0043613384,0.0062074754,0.039335202],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000019306262,0.0000120649465,0.0001274798,0.00005887985,0.0000010286333,0.000064671185,0.00020337071,0.000020354872,0.000046916342,0.00099609,0.9919527,0.006497082],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010822205,0.000016622233,0.005951212,0.0004141379,0.0000022837476,0.00006426646,0.0017154901,0.000033568576,0.00008285104,0.0007648159,0.9909148,0.000029128418],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.45000228,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.74793005,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5499977,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.021445846,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019327093,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.894766},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6903731061","doi":"10.13140/rg.2.2.11533.05602","title":"Judicial Insights into Parenting Orders Under Recent Amendments to the Canadian Divorce Act","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Government (linguistics); Legislature; Work (physics)","score_opus":0.03536357579227641,"score_gpt":0.3208382454383051,"score_spread":0.2854746696460287,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6903731061","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18568048,0.009730477,0.0031847397,0.118615635,0.00086424197,0.00018098271,0.0009870833,0.00004543277,0.680711],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9495684,0.004275448,0.0014488461,0.013403311,0.00032674283,0.00007175137,0.00015017424,0.00004496398,0.030710476],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98003125,0.002941501,0.00068731525,0.0012222137,0.007376598,0.007741121],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9635978,0.020715198,0.0015062697,0.0008916794,0.011939934,0.0013491779],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.013308232,0.00042315098,0.0007486402,0.004678748,0.02784628,0.017983194,0.0044351416,0.01010634,0.008002676],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0607553,0.0010379776,0.0007961513,0.0066391346,0.021555101,0.0054315883,0.0030605276,0.013264847,0.0003846443],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000022694398,0.000019652036,0.0021605277,0.000032519387,0.0000091250595,0.00022154175,0.014654968,0.00046289086,0.00012358767,0.96460086,0.013409804,0.004281851],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000120526194,0.0000503511,0.069227435,0.0013363351,0.00024118496,0.00026716935,0.09527684,0.0050286176,0.0010320185,0.35495335,0.47204193,0.00042426315],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9852952,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99140054,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14536351,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.14536351,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.23067334,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9912572},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6949653008","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.15418631","title":"The influence of civil law on the evolution of the modern and contemporary Canadian constitution and institutions","year":2025,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Civil law (Civil law); Constitution; Relation (database); Comparative law; Public law; Common law; Constitutional law; Legal history","score_opus":0.03727077056225938,"score_gpt":0.2541252990419243,"score_spread":0.21685452847966494,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6949653008","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.19581884,0.011346902,0.0023651272,0.017185835,0.0002001268,0.000033089913,0.0003790015,0.000056004374,0.7726151],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9687668,0.002775649,0.00069020013,0.00040797488,0.000044871824,0.0000070259584,0.000065361506,0.00002287252,0.027219268],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99842864,0.00022288713,0.000021871778,0.00015238712,0.0006735232,0.0005006106],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980281,0.00043056213,0.00015720555,0.000071136856,0.0010534442,0.00025964607],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014140967,0.00017965675,0.00013654892,0.0030619318,0.008135206,0.0055675535,0.00070621446,0.0006648847,0.006128985],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00296304,0.00018132126,0.00014804977,0.0034047703,0.016029727,0.0015437198,0.0017034205,0.0013401903,0.00023375038],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020222766,0.000010304025,0.0041077714,0.000046981775,0.00000824006,0.00014017263,0.015652813,0.000764489,0.00037293302,0.9404843,0.006947921,0.031443916],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013867247,0.000020434856,0.081970975,0.00031510997,0.000030018426,0.00022720775,0.013468755,0.0017966784,0.00072515226,0.06613054,0.8352277,0.00007360573],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96371067,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9841074,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12053925,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.12053925,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.068922065,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8745775},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6980444723","doi":"","title":"The Case for a Canadian Nondelegation Doctrine","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"","score_opus":0.014994849434603115,"score_gpt":0.27967804805574065,"score_spread":0.26468319862113754,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6980444723","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.01997409,0.002044569,0.0043611005,0.16714719,0.0014302423,0.000059197773,0.00017505029,0.00006488391,0.8047436],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.64688104,0.0017577466,0.005081607,0.0907529,0.0007281694,0.000094450064,0.0001331496,0.00014865077,0.25442222],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9895955,0.0011443965,0.00020243615,0.0014023685,0.00403205,0.0036231996],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99003816,0.0024923743,0.00021696427,0.0005960611,0.005080394,0.0015761217],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007366484,0.00053348177,0.00077549263,0.0019694937,0.028852943,0.012647431,0.0031957547,0.015212063,0.017156081],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023251723,0.0005684862,0.0010074688,0.0020323116,0.018247964,0.005587596,0.0049226065,0.01688731,0.0012219859],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013467463,0.000006164854,0.00031156032,0.000012554923,0.0000033107747,0.00007850989,0.0008307107,0.00009542583,0.00006014478,0.97037536,0.024465196,0.0037475037],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009371108,0.000019217183,0.0027365154,0.00033523593,0.000058231497,0.00026318379,0.0045707673,0.0013634487,0.0004233203,0.34669,0.6432978,0.00014872543],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9554529,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9713856,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.93978184,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06021815,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.13376433,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.43691534},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6983275006","doi":"","title":"The Malta Papers:Comparative Experiences On Mixity In Public And Private Law","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Research Publications (Maastricht University)","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Law Foundation of Nova Scotia","funders":"","keywords":"Private law; Conflict of laws; Comparative law; Jurisdiction; Public law; Civil law (Civil law); Foundation (evidence); Acknowledgement; Commercial law; Black letter law","score_opus":0.1572143087209409,"score_gpt":0.39585091013450163,"score_spread":0.23863660141356074,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6983275006","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.46013445,0.04265791,0.00104952,0.08116193,0.00091443735,0.00012313352,0.0003682337,0.000055322434,0.41353503],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9442778,0.008429835,0.00023543034,0.002208823,0.00010994335,0.00010411908,0.0000861462,0.00009063223,0.044457197],"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9913762,0.0050349277,0.00028558561,0.0005205661,0.0011490214,0.0016335904],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9931278,0.004227026,0.00060457893,0.00041304738,0.00068744365,0.000940052],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005397899,0.0004815072,0.0010486706,0.00347891,0.033112127,0.02790049,0.002033222,0.0050083473,0.017012408],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015247761,0.0007065305,0.00030204444,0.0088702105,0.022299074,0.015012964,0.013781449,0.0048112385,0.00095317705],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000029596335,0.000041500884,0.0010253144,0.00013237985,0.000009377683,0.00085126597,0.71505046,0.000029182173,0.00020595167,0.26186568,0.014070643,0.0066887406],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001428881,0.0000128963875,0.0036589683,0.0003588866,0.000010433201,0.0002771307,0.6099488,0.00005827358,0.00021594985,0.009409985,0.37600937,0.00002497187],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13640136,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.25367627,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13640136,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.034388855,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.010014393,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.27121484},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6987380912","doi":"","title":"Structures of Judgment: How the Modern\\nSupreme Court of Canada Organizes its Reasons","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Lethbridge","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Supreme court; Style (visual arts); Court decision; Precedent; High Court","score_opus":0.016276143004333964,"score_gpt":0.24881429909498048,"score_spread":0.23253815609064651,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6987380912","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12061193,0.0017801545,0.03498097,0.026206829,0.0003254136,0.00019539653,0.00046455712,0.00029925004,0.81513554],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9523546,0.00060727046,0.0094751315,0.0011028803,0.000064438165,0.00005356079,0.00016914395,0.00014453196,0.036028504],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.98996955,0.0024107988,0.0002107054,0.00088853925,0.0040558926,0.0024645883],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.991999,0.0017647588,0.00046336884,0.0007321537,0.0038041435,0.0012365922],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0063429326,0.0004131885,0.00039286018,0.0042873896,0.018023735,0.026092876,0.0024091697,0.0026538002,0.0053676325],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02019688,0.0005958709,0.00063968875,0.00445462,0.026392093,0.0069072098,0.003577713,0.003988287,0.00089559983],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000016849928,0.000011401731,0.002401577,0.000017126575,0.000010839632,0.00009696519,0.02231079,0.000923041,0.00027031143,0.9474413,0.0077682943,0.018731533],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000057736164,0.00003915879,0.021979129,0.000332192,0.000070871305,0.00014979651,0.05537017,0.0060235756,0.0013039605,0.47260073,0.44184592,0.00022674643],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9204556,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9529559,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.097143665,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.097143665,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.12679718,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.70482993},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6988008665","doi":"","title":"Whiting v. Krassner","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"","score_opus":0.01952518278292006,"score_gpt":0.32055299764817835,"score_spread":0.3010278148652583,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6988008665","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005602842,0.0054785884,0.0013766183,0.06348562,0.0034419596,0.00013939821,0.00093714223,0.00031840254,0.91921943],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.073708236,0.0020692183,0.0017075334,0.11130858,0.00036827152,0.00016859864,0.00038752786,0.00015632741,0.81012565],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9969909,0.00035025598,0.00014380852,0.00043437243,0.0010800122,0.0010006595],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987637,0.0003427428,0.00007072142,0.0001414425,0.00046769492,0.00021376417],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0026588368,0.000638205,0.00048738325,0.000665688,0.010136965,0.0065505817,0.0016748378,0.012414381,0.028382806],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0062414603,0.0007058175,0.00059838727,0.00067792356,0.0026340906,0.002519506,0.0029399404,0.011291385,0.007963732],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000043106516,0.000032231328,0.0010416697,0.000062813524,0.000009888059,0.000380052,0.0013825707,0.000113138565,0.0005568501,0.29077056,0.6851922,0.02041498],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000021146448,0.000015520402,0.0025008952,0.00025089039,0.000018139755,0.00013511992,0.000691368,0.000110794186,0.0005835042,0.014388954,0.98123413,0.00004957641],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.39258254,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7073946,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.39258254,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0062566535,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02499458,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7805949},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6989768757","doi":"","title":"Charleston School of Law, National Moot Court Competition: Team Quarter Finalist","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Quarter (Canadian coin); Government (linguistics); Work (physics)","score_opus":0.033511784490963994,"score_gpt":0.32532123869156093,"score_spread":0.29180945420059695,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6989768757","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.020242004,0.0030945472,0.0009276938,0.28722867,0.01422084,0.0007814256,0.0026536472,0.0006421643,0.67020893],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.020125967,0.00038803509,0.0005076078,0.0543218,0.0007120605,0.00021963828,0.00025208518,0.00016244735,0.92331034],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9935247,0.00057086867,0.0002517142,0.0008878585,0.00211119,0.0026538228],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99193007,0.0016255071,0.00017317539,0.000259488,0.0025394955,0.0034722358],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0048118094,0.001034905,0.0012253696,0.0016488157,0.040775422,0.01894154,0.003948327,0.033412386,0.13572615],"category_scores_gemma":[0.015357306,0.0020849253,0.0013489884,0.0011205944,0.0030423137,0.004273667,0.006081421,0.026550237,0.027612628],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033091015,0.00011474498,0.0007222761,0.000027533644,0.000010003325,0.00035580285,0.0003473327,0.00013747471,0.00014554107,0.015350168,0.97730494,0.005451111],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00012242117,0.0000823532,0.009289726,0.00030350924,0.00003438326,0.00018704779,0.004431857,0.0010604206,0.0005199093,0.0090661,0.9747693,0.00013298633],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.31066665,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.79233843,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.31066665,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.016214162,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05052647,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6177167},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6989843473","doi":"","title":"Canadian Media Guild v Canadian Broadcasting Corp","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Broadcasting (networking); Guild; Trade union; European union","score_opus":0.027340919919937447,"score_gpt":0.2599260879013641,"score_spread":0.23258516798142667,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6989843473","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0072330884,0.0021996503,0.00036787128,0.039254222,0.001012493,0.0000625125,0.001504989,0.00013173281,0.9482335],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.12462775,0.0025511312,0.0005950192,0.058329437,0.0005278223,0.00009850722,0.0010695861,0.000110556255,0.81209016],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9956542,0.00015635986,0.000055183493,0.00029350375,0.0025739106,0.0012667493],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969649,0.00054090424,0.00008467538,0.00011015267,0.0018217806,0.00047764118],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013010342,0.0006613724,0.00028905473,0.0019725712,0.021436162,0.005447549,0.0018422429,0.007939688,0.07511749],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0068225563,0.00062083785,0.0005720799,0.002147177,0.0020484857,0.0016288651,0.0017835534,0.0050694942,0.0064046923],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000558141,0.000018804025,0.0020508065,0.00007415918,0.000015332844,0.0009786006,0.0010061299,0.00013216597,0.00048174383,0.12382062,0.8511723,0.020193541],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000018233712,0.000011045329,0.002537779,0.000086993896,0.000025526208,0.0001494746,0.00074260245,0.00013928856,0.0004550007,0.0017012052,0.9941017,0.000031085412],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9673824,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9849303,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07511749,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.039515696,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.080596514,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28670776},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6991315305","doi":"","title":"Forum Selection Clauses before Canadian Courts: A Tale of Two (or Three) Solitudes","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Selection (genetic algorithm); Government (linguistics); Agency (philosophy); Jury selection","score_opus":0.016067963328931935,"score_gpt":0.28448325833944926,"score_spread":0.2684152950105173,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6991315305","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07411077,0.0047248397,0.016632497,0.22630174,0.003167304,0.0003115267,0.00040269247,0.00036450214,0.67398417],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.75231993,0.0018343816,0.008494888,0.050913427,0.00073289097,0.00016609802,0.00017473451,0.0002681539,0.18509549],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9746216,0.003429732,0.0005186258,0.0023344895,0.009329279,0.009766373],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97379875,0.0085870745,0.0006157634,0.001288579,0.0107689705,0.0049409377],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019294756,0.0007127662,0.00064240507,0.002891134,0.048045505,0.01952449,0.0041650156,0.011334473,0.017405022],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04685978,0.0010483948,0.0008179316,0.0036002314,0.022562448,0.007665852,0.006334691,0.01640014,0.0012726457],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007193169,0.000057958423,0.0023321933,0.000049913655,0.000014154292,0.0002197305,0.01890158,0.00031452646,0.00047711298,0.8204031,0.112366945,0.04479074],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000092833776,0.000066203094,0.013156889,0.00056916196,0.000077442164,0.00010736664,0.03666318,0.0014769043,0.0015433994,0.12990944,0.81603104,0.0003061479],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95967805,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9836182,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.109380566,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.109380566,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.20428327,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7936153},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6996003542","doi":"","title":"Private International Law in Common Law Canada: Cases, Text and Materials, 3rd ed.","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Common law; Private law; Public law; Conflict of laws; Comparative law; Municipal law; Civil law (Civil law)","score_opus":0.010842185037731792,"score_gpt":0.2734022041468452,"score_spread":0.2625600191091134,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6996003542","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004434128,0.10546879,0.0029000652,0.027811248,0.0016471226,0.00029044616,0.010907064,0.0007363465,0.84580475],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.058450624,0.081846766,0.004707308,0.009196597,0.0007202556,0.00030531807,0.0055455654,0.0004122301,0.83881533],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997968,0.00012024411,0.000067074034,0.000091366346,0.0013412992,0.00041192467],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99857545,0.00042148452,0.00008786741,0.00007439502,0.0006685063,0.00017227427],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0012858362,0.000964282,0.00056568667,0.006802488,0.0075579057,0.0063009067,0.0026614643,0.0035955734,0.051763255],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0048259734,0.0010034182,0.0004972258,0.016108217,0.0044580004,0.0033829391,0.0018899264,0.0019878934,0.009258871],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000005081332,0.000019446365,0.0002673823,0.00014261667,0.000002998526,0.000084893036,0.0010586184,0.00022132827,0.00007881391,0.03607262,0.935066,0.026980098],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000036966171,0.000004918171,0.0025243596,0.00041987188,0.0000067964675,0.000109119435,0.0018580129,0.00021777993,0.00014833918,0.007935126,0.98674715,0.000024964911],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9477306,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9815245,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0522694,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04329438,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07788418,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.31412423},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6996342734","doi":"","title":"Safety Valves: A Band-Aid Solution to the Ills of Mandatory Minimums?","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Safety valve; Statutory law; Work (physics); Discretion; Supreme court; Work safety","score_opus":0.016434526667478327,"score_gpt":0.27601037551575,"score_spread":0.2595758488482717,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6996342734","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09043116,0.0048652464,0.18124324,0.22303614,0.0022092958,0.000187017,0.00020920235,0.00082441,0.49699426],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9123229,0.0014030928,0.03450286,0.015549295,0.00046819806,0.00009235788,0.00005496757,0.00012335287,0.035482917],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99387544,0.0014419149,0.00018998775,0.0005621308,0.0029295257,0.001000945],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954412,0.0017339438,0.0004188402,0.0007403001,0.0012472043,0.00041849562],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005532142,0.00034050966,0.00032409857,0.0013804507,0.004825548,0.006159054,0.0023136572,0.0040445207,0.0056632073],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01587088,0.0003814441,0.00047873653,0.00085760886,0.011502498,0.004580288,0.002954267,0.005583509,0.0008865652],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000012156216,0.0000069923417,0.00024661503,0.00001727956,0.0000036704096,0.000035092988,0.00051824376,0.00026043318,0.00024534337,0.97693574,0.005377996,0.016340492],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000105173815,0.000113702874,0.0023671028,0.00048330423,0.00004649458,0.000256304,0.0033726518,0.0039834124,0.0019207171,0.71140426,0.2758484,0.00009848556],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09908408,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16631487,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09908408,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0074817603,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.020857459,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19701469},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6999111685","doi":"","title":"CAW-Canada, Local 1015 v Scotsburn Dairy Group","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Pension; Jurisdiction; Liability; Grievance; Pension fund; Collective bargaining","score_opus":0.01827540020680759,"score_gpt":0.25421552490691396,"score_spread":0.23594012470010636,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6999111685","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0436636,0.002798288,0.0008367049,0.02252849,0.00054617017,0.00022484864,0.0021158634,0.00014507369,0.92714095],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.15332562,0.00082090637,0.00068475446,0.021857064,0.000040739924,0.0001292473,0.0005557964,0.00004271654,0.8225432],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99824214,0.00008773084,0.000034489898,0.00020441109,0.0007469482,0.00068424776],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991554,0.00015826257,0.00003036616,0.000035597513,0.0004427777,0.00017758236],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009673855,0.00035991776,0.00018840471,0.0008605054,0.017513873,0.0039685434,0.0014366461,0.0044143694,0.030111825],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002246686,0.00053459225,0.0003644568,0.0012737117,0.0017347694,0.0008301467,0.0013405483,0.002976439,0.0027727634],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001805626,0.00010085068,0.019413048,0.00019065628,0.0000354825,0.0016362548,0.004967703,0.0006305705,0.0030073095,0.36557257,0.5660385,0.038226448],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000067845795,0.00003989156,0.013092308,0.00016659428,0.000038152455,0.00016777526,0.0033337534,0.00041605742,0.0012151549,0.00541398,0.9759907,0.000057791232],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9811679,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9954384,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.031358536,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.031358536,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.08940439,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22752321},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W6999389560","doi":"","title":"Compensation for Extraordinary Rendition: A\\nComparative Study and the Need for a Domestic Cause of\\nAction in the United States","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Scholarly Commons (University of the Pacific)","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Compensation (psychology); Legislation; Government (linguistics); State (computer science)","score_opus":0.0430371593938651,"score_gpt":0.29551883480554914,"score_spread":0.25248167541168404,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W6999389560","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.90880716,0.0011392565,0.00020424108,0.048638787,0.00028098043,0.000033384487,0.00012939905,0.000008130477,0.04075858],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9943771,0.00028960727,0.000055600718,0.0027645023,0.00005144973,0.0000124920225,0.000037058733,0.000003613041,0.002408633],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9961004,0.0012255099,0.00020646644,0.0001771632,0.00042491948,0.0018655162],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98551184,0.005789796,0.0038960257,0.0006325475,0.0017935284,0.0023762158],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0035700083,0.00012260232,0.00026006813,0.001396955,0.008042624,0.0032682195,0.001264449,0.0031517043,0.009110559],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022436671,0.00025824562,0.00034939262,0.0013453612,0.0040255226,0.002101364,0.0043635755,0.004651731,0.00024972466],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000234432,0.00048731832,0.69381964,0.00019198816,0.00007834125,0.0032922705,0.05898664,0.0005131179,0.00030250606,0.14279445,0.05067027,0.048629094],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004692014,0.00014225424,0.4988264,0.00084167154,0.00009781739,0.002163335,0.39451563,0.0011656713,0.0005691836,0.014729537,0.086833484,0.000068013076],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05469447,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.16070351,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05469447,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0035171309,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009545455,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10875225},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7005345869","doi":"","title":"Regulation of Contracts in Canadian Private International Law","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Conflict of laws; Work (physics); Private law; Legislation","score_opus":0.012380739075759456,"score_gpt":0.2688447677873889,"score_spread":0.25646402871162943,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7005345869","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.06128582,0.0030150965,0.006858435,0.03726221,0.0002934522,0.00016175013,0.0003736616,0.000082507504,0.8906671],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8851101,0.0018586614,0.004155883,0.005104049,0.00015389216,0.00012366395,0.00013366085,0.000059175425,0.103300855],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.98436075,0.0024836513,0.0004142578,0.0012195028,0.006045143,0.0054766997],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9900988,0.0035625182,0.00042631332,0.00064187334,0.00406399,0.0012065344],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007391142,0.00053155347,0.0006644027,0.0034659475,0.024717934,0.019677471,0.0032773926,0.008713192,0.01056634],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022778375,0.00089864765,0.00085118064,0.006237593,0.020517062,0.004114225,0.0035973762,0.007996463,0.0004356162],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000043632435,0.0000070613623,0.00031474925,0.000009400611,0.0000028500924,0.00003214851,0.0015262584,0.0005451132,0.00003436096,0.9892831,0.0056004617,0.0026401628],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005732092,0.000028660226,0.011888263,0.00047021464,0.000073877745,0.00012899261,0.0084322095,0.008405786,0.00046870494,0.51644635,0.45338055,0.00021898211],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98606175,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.98997587,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.17132732,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.17132732,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.25723115,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.96114284},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7008246214","doi":"","title":"Bindend karakter van onderlinge akkoorden (“mutual agreements”) en de status ervan in het intern recht – Sifto Canada Corp / Her Majesty the Queen (Canada)","year":2018,"lang":"nl","type":"article","venue":"Lirias (KU Leuven)","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Majesty; Queen (butterfly); Population; White (mutation)","score_opus":0.015546057782817315,"score_gpt":0.2725804836666124,"score_spread":0.2570344258837951,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7008246214","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.025370402,0.009487293,0.012527831,0.10108272,0.0034896606,0.00020619061,0.0008477946,0.00016168428,0.8468264],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4517482,0.0039020674,0.010434679,0.009772171,0.0006641702,0.00034950397,0.00082014385,0.00020399805,0.5221051],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9852557,0.0050229155,0.00096298754,0.0011248253,0.004971072,0.0026625148],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9899682,0.00510189,0.00084299885,0.0010245827,0.001910206,0.0011522055],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009816377,0.00037671905,0.0005395681,0.0009376844,0.008107975,0.016947811,0.0022890542,0.0070525473,0.048491843],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021429006,0.0006211003,0.0003696187,0.0016426883,0.008471434,0.0064102076,0.00623947,0.0069791353,0.0044476297],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028862152,0.000025026107,0.00045146578,0.00007953242,0.0000119855085,0.00018107807,0.0051707723,0.00021243727,0.000286548,0.9046306,0.0647571,0.024164636],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000161722,0.000008987623,0.0010282843,0.00024148443,0.000015988546,0.00010833935,0.0037025122,0.00032266177,0.00043260175,0.05876146,0.93532354,0.00003807634],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.28132337,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3196074,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7186766,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0130354455,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04860165,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.55937177},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7008316119","doi":"","title":"Canada-United States Law Institute annual conference: the management and resolution of cross border disputes as Canada and the U.S. enter the 21st century, April 14-16, 2000 (tape 1 of 2)","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Diplomacy; Settlement (finance); Commission; Dispute resolution; Joint (building); Resolution (logic); European commission","score_opus":0.007415871277765849,"score_gpt":0.2601785605129353,"score_spread":0.2527626892351695,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7008316119","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.006769461,0.045336574,0.0016732229,0.12373685,0.006942748,0.0004113118,0.005837173,0.00058019423,0.8087125],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.074691854,0.036833335,0.003657777,0.010539613,0.00091986096,0.00014848975,0.0037134015,0.00021124462,0.8692844],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984849,0.000093329516,0.000021102822,0.000055326134,0.0008599747,0.00048535198],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971016,0.00013633518,0.00008488704,0.000050784463,0.0013849806,0.0012414028],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0017362721,0.0005225584,0.00025930902,0.0019984315,0.012645817,0.008391917,0.0014517219,0.0025614568,0.046411958],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0033774278,0.0003533035,0.00020628239,0.0045234733,0.0031833823,0.001879801,0.0017988082,0.0025038193,0.0064310753],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000041944068,0.000007921351,0.00026451473,0.000020240075,9.350832e-7,0.000020459156,0.00030398456,0.00003365131,0.00003863518,0.0029384752,0.9815051,0.014861859],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000030902916,0.0000027808233,0.0028079862,0.00011731852,0.000002276084,0.000016538293,0.0023968688,0.00004497336,0.000065417385,0.0007377798,0.99379504,0.000009949911],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.96210027,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.991776,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.05206653,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05206653,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14007641,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3777709},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7008473100","doi":"","title":"Canada-United States Law Institute annual conference: the management and resolution of cross border disputes as Canada and the U.S. enter the 21st century, April 14-16, 2000 (tape 2 of 2)","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Resolution (logic); State (computer science); Legislation; Dispute resolution","score_opus":0.007215303367252644,"score_gpt":0.25976057872621555,"score_spread":0.25254527535896293,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7008473100","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.008140427,0.017796215,0.0017137922,0.10680096,0.0057789045,0.00039396097,0.005326229,0.00052907737,0.8535205],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.085874006,0.013928149,0.0030397947,0.010262905,0.0007871957,0.00016910255,0.0031771096,0.00021686565,0.88254493],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99857485,0.00011899048,0.000016700691,0.000052734216,0.0007085031,0.0005281885],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99759775,0.00016975144,0.00007248304,0.00005284586,0.0010059406,0.001101284],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020272252,0.0005437718,0.00026437972,0.0017739277,0.01631461,0.007144727,0.0016207433,0.0032722529,0.055003826],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003818566,0.00036896986,0.00023889789,0.0034694772,0.0027663263,0.0017595609,0.0020906774,0.0031658073,0.007515207],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000056589415,0.000010885865,0.0002841473,0.000014981889,0.0000012474881,0.000027246566,0.0004020511,0.000040681825,0.00004495186,0.0025296083,0.98474705,0.011891417],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005830706,0.0000039449787,0.0042837434,0.00009782094,0.000003161248,0.000017576456,0.00319181,0.00006864615,0.000097929034,0.0010433104,0.99117345,0.000012824796],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9511694,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9906178,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.055003826,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.033686895,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.11638207,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24441665},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7010426284","doi":"","title":"Intangible Justice? Intellectual Property Disputes and Canadian Small Claims Courts","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Intellectual property; Nova scotia; Jurisdiction; Competence (human resources); Economic Justice; Dispute resolution","score_opus":0.024583054766330888,"score_gpt":0.2580312812363469,"score_spread":0.233448226470016,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7010426284","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.20128505,0.006467511,0.0041904473,0.110475875,0.00033760577,0.00011508694,0.00027441815,0.0000692688,0.6767847],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97361225,0.0013264188,0.0008809998,0.0047383136,0.00004862875,0.0000170584,0.000050220213,0.000012156863,0.01931402],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99049497,0.0009863816,0.00023179062,0.0007065568,0.0034039658,0.0041762837],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9868477,0.0044480194,0.0010593828,0.0006320111,0.0049008653,0.00211209],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0060628583,0.00025581563,0.0003786937,0.0028131143,0.03254929,0.0130589,0.0027421843,0.004382734,0.008500378],"category_scores_gemma":[0.023195218,0.00034378897,0.00041163753,0.003449287,0.02008201,0.0033478818,0.0051087025,0.004724253,0.00029811275],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018111621,0.000016415597,0.004720875,0.000040801628,0.000009808147,0.0003320895,0.010451205,0.000479362,0.00014242268,0.95632213,0.01044685,0.017019952],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000092121154,0.000042227817,0.061361197,0.000857555,0.00012719327,0.0005383982,0.04892233,0.0044267834,0.0011068695,0.27140707,0.61082864,0.00028965555],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9880095,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9918222,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13905908,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.13905908,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.18147466,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9985694},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7011204039","doi":"","title":"Legislating About Relocating Bill C-78, N.S. and B.C.","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Relocation; Appeal; Notice; Statute; Supreme court; Government (linguistics)","score_opus":0.015723792794735767,"score_gpt":0.27648948631200854,"score_spread":0.26076569351727275,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7011204039","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.030929275,0.004593739,0.0037637376,0.095399596,0.0037423843,0.001506652,0.0019680117,0.00055618153,0.85754037],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.23651241,0.005235206,0.009484907,0.20027523,0.0015772487,0.0010386404,0.0012651716,0.00022336801,0.5443878],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99133366,0.0006443346,0.00041743583,0.00096821086,0.0037115528,0.0029248828],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99554527,0.0010806915,0.0003582346,0.00016007473,0.0018933999,0.0009622542],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0051445724,0.0008096359,0.00039939448,0.0014413587,0.013107232,0.005483168,0.0031903775,0.0107772285,0.015540263],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010887236,0.0012032005,0.0005552517,0.0013415393,0.005366756,0.0017098807,0.0019441794,0.008864683,0.004020505],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000057623947,0.00012583706,0.0044668545,0.00016505878,0.000013886404,0.0009504625,0.005459494,0.0008143957,0.0034572077,0.35121903,0.59927666,0.033993382],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000370045,0.00007862339,0.012336576,0.0005794863,0.00003143036,0.00015208713,0.0034001863,0.000441601,0.001067971,0.009684706,0.97208875,0.000101543825],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9015718,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96921194,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09842819,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.054710906,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.110918336,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.39695728},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7016059518","doi":"","title":"What of litigation?: Domestic courts and lawmaking processes in transnational law","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS)","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institute on Governance","funders":"","keywords":"Lawmaking; Globalization; Government (linguistics); Action (physics); Legislature; Legislation","score_opus":0.0295708467779748,"score_gpt":0.3255717681592132,"score_spread":0.2960009213812384,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7016059518","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.2152745,0.0135206,0.018647363,0.12712441,0.00042960775,0.00012012203,0.00018606338,0.000076549455,0.62462074],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9921744,0.0012587031,0.00089967676,0.0014634458,0.00008799788,0.000034305434,0.000018834326,0.000024421499,0.0040382287],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.982278,0.013093698,0.0005142511,0.0012010932,0.001435139,0.0014778236],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.958002,0.03389224,0.0027707869,0.0015182007,0.0022158623,0.0016009924],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.016908515,0.0002478212,0.00051551993,0.0021267484,0.00830344,0.025652658,0.0015980136,0.0072920695,0.013429922],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05019486,0.00049210165,0.00046460016,0.003501072,0.02503959,0.02671415,0.0064053084,0.0044282833,0.0010007437],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028370237,0.00004164507,0.0023632746,0.000044106437,0.000007638434,0.00029755992,0.03642784,0.00019448854,0.0000745239,0.9461015,0.0030858149,0.011333247],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000031901614,0.000030983716,0.0054147756,0.00060642976,0.00002512459,0.00040601424,0.13941243,0.0017057783,0.00034265424,0.7971409,0.05483957,0.0000434217],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0134865735,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0105212545,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.025652658,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008905776,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009364237,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08942181},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7017783167","doi":"","title":"Canada-United States Law Institute annual conference : the world's longest undefended border: gateway or checkpoint? (DVD 1 of 3)","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Gateway (web page); State (computer science)","score_opus":0.02813175608480099,"score_gpt":0.2873405675343251,"score_spread":0.25920881144952407,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7017783167","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.005668181,0.017584443,0.0005378551,0.15696324,0.03160954,0.00041087763,0.011194254,0.00064671354,0.775385],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.026149567,0.005526154,0.000792171,0.025722045,0.0021031622,0.00012342528,0.003345251,0.00021587135,0.93602246],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988985,0.00005119341,0.000018602272,0.00005763674,0.00050456333,0.00046951044],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985343,0.00008611572,0.00004173596,0.00003176173,0.0006518573,0.0006541927],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013038724,0.0006147018,0.00047532434,0.0016607296,0.013344924,0.008075559,0.0014635656,0.0066750967,0.08507206],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0023099026,0.0005438054,0.00050470576,0.0022963677,0.0018065949,0.0019111334,0.0018473442,0.0050454116,0.016220812],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000042917563,0.000007093173,0.00010698617,0.000008243532,6.707114e-7,0.000016607464,0.00004752882,0.000014725202,0.000015470634,0.001252229,0.9957023,0.0028238855],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006684247,0.0000028625286,0.0016409645,0.000071641,0.000003662288,0.000012904563,0.00074623694,0.000033800396,0.000055902186,0.0005903882,0.99682486,0.000010114178],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.833397,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.96662056,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.16660303,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02442275,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.056524266,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.33516836},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7017841418","doi":"","title":"Canada, Netherlands Agree on Treaty Treatment of Closed Mutual Funds","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS)","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Treaty; Government (linguistics); Investment (military)","score_opus":0.021921442015778836,"score_gpt":0.282350350235553,"score_spread":0.26042890821977416,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7017841418","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.013206034,0.0062949457,0.010478841,0.28328377,0.01362748,0.00076539884,0.002689937,0.00052171684,0.6691319],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.12060323,0.0028025876,0.011729147,0.29568556,0.0025261287,0.0012517588,0.0009754445,0.0005582064,0.563868],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.95891035,0.003783602,0.0028963527,0.0035145422,0.021425154,0.009469992],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.97236836,0.0090770405,0.0010267419,0.002256956,0.012898418,0.0023724919],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.015139919,0.0010799654,0.0019481018,0.003258411,0.015664384,0.019207278,0.0060201967,0.041394215,0.0115720825],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06047843,0.0015542825,0.002620495,0.0048135472,0.008535791,0.005387973,0.007071053,0.026986491,0.0021264348],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000043713037,0.000031683274,0.0004998047,0.00008721235,0.000037653394,0.00020696495,0.0018034242,0.00029158732,0.00022384927,0.75743747,0.23159938,0.0077372408],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000086054104,0.00001787326,0.0020715035,0.00038237465,0.000103700644,0.00015529808,0.0010407863,0.00040135626,0.0005089611,0.04572947,0.9493637,0.00013895471],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.87920415,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9135643,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.120795846,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.05714501,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.18124601,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.41461802},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7019798847","doi":"","title":"I giudici della Corte Suprema del Canada e la Judicial Cross-Fertilization: «a more cosmopolitan approach to law»?","year":2014,"lang":"it","type":"book-chapter","venue":"CINECA IRIS Institutional Research Information System (University of Bari Aldo Moro)","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Subject (documents); Identity (music); Constitution; Government (linguistics); Economic Justice; Field (mathematics); Perspective (graphical)","score_opus":0.05419468583203665,"score_gpt":0.29981256005631807,"score_spread":0.2456178742242814,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7019798847","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.009003361,0.027258553,0.0019545718,0.0866109,0.0011919116,0.000039639785,0.00012552549,0.000043104475,0.87377244],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4474648,0.024813268,0.0021156473,0.025920216,0.00093001424,0.00010206078,0.00009761051,0.00013469555,0.49842173],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9972228,0.00032242353,0.000050845883,0.00031085213,0.0008478227,0.0012452706],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99902034,0.00028699418,0.000055104978,0.00007743927,0.00038374995,0.00017641079],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019526492,0.0005364397,0.00051685673,0.0020481893,0.014297564,0.013926993,0.0020870643,0.005541578,0.012278844],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0036699574,0.0004544604,0.0004021276,0.004513808,0.02013067,0.0047320733,0.0027709734,0.009475978,0.0008787547],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000022061372,0.000004843697,0.000109589615,0.00001305605,0.0000018458034,0.000024697049,0.0018904406,0.0000648592,0.000020984973,0.9680636,0.024038395,0.0057654856],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000019043915,0.000007432265,0.0024968765,0.00042362214,0.000018018436,0.00010876886,0.0062459963,0.0004251962,0.00017693781,0.18336461,0.806673,0.0000405508],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95400167,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97764194,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9290388,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0709612,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14119236,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.51486194},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7023744948","doi":"","title":"Personal Connecting Factors","year":2022,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Casebook; Conflict of laws; Private law; Common law; Public law; Jurisdiction; Municipal law; Comparative law; International law","score_opus":0.026778895591155816,"score_gpt":0.28665064855114164,"score_spread":0.2598717529599858,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7023744948","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.025337417,0.0014007109,0.0026234994,0.020470679,0.0013135329,0.00011687734,0.00049380027,0.00014280167,0.9481008],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.37323248,0.0027493415,0.0020070646,0.011755373,0.00064197584,0.00020779477,0.00061544107,0.000215104,0.6085754],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9966762,0.0009837091,0.00010580582,0.00064498215,0.0007569758,0.00083227607],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9942405,0.0010051244,0.00040254602,0.0006015,0.0013476211,0.002402801],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019955062,0.00043923248,0.00034798254,0.0013774275,0.010249855,0.006672625,0.00096383196,0.0015998808,0.1979233],"category_scores_gemma":[0.011628,0.00024522448,0.00032787016,0.0021354416,0.0034908492,0.0056872717,0.007446268,0.0031356898,0.031248398],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000060374674,0.00016097794,0.025902284,0.00017173788,0.000029339979,0.0017999855,0.08091395,0.00012595722,0.00026438196,0.35526904,0.3662364,0.16906555],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005030725,0.000017418639,0.004307066,0.00016194305,0.000009490999,0.0007689266,0.02695334,0.000050594706,0.000050569142,0.015286237,0.9523757,0.000013809587],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.013059718,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01965283,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1979233,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0041087214,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0054719336,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6621194},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7025031187","doi":"","title":"Spousal Support under British Columbia's New Family Law Act: A Preliminary Analysis","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Family law; Legislation; Spouse; Identification (biology); Government (linguistics)","score_opus":0.028116562750578483,"score_gpt":0.28517552560119336,"score_spread":0.25705896285061486,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7025031187","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.985719,0.00024884392,0.000022641367,0.0011669893,0.000012153333,0.000071682414,0.0022747172,0.000001972249,0.010481936],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9919036,0.00031093962,0.000031754033,0.00026654374,0.000010757725,0.00006951744,0.0012587346,0.0000028515194,0.0061453097],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9957703,0.00063612545,0.0002419674,0.0001562031,0.0011073254,0.0020881186],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9821562,0.0051397635,0.0022687,0.00051835855,0.006608924,0.0033079698],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002587205,0.00022988844,0.0005616163,0.004252882,0.005393025,0.0034386104,0.0020045615,0.0013760843,0.0071753873],"category_scores_gemma":[0.016574888,0.0003702237,0.00041989321,0.008486824,0.0010986186,0.0009518883,0.0018628972,0.002413727,0.0006265147],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00031844465,0.0002048834,0.97643197,0.00003796003,0.000048740247,0.00025848488,0.007902512,0.00018504061,0.00006557822,0.0014919061,0.0053399857,0.0077145635],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010633832,0.000027737695,0.9785614,0.000041584844,0.00003976486,0.000029682695,0.018185085,0.0001950728,0.000047465433,0.000096323376,0.0027579681,0.0000073063725],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9525051,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9809718,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04749489,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017854875,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.027748289,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.12954682},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7025243950","doi":"","title":"West Brom breaks transfer record on Zenit's Rondon","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"Internet Archive (Internet Archive)","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Club; Transfer (computing); Set (abstract data type); Order (exchange); Quarter (Canadian coin)","score_opus":0.02167851626879516,"score_gpt":0.27456050309837554,"score_spread":0.2528819868295804,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7025243950","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0073843407,0.001085548,0.00039222985,0.0044894456,0.004856672,0.00010243038,0.003928845,0.0006964449,0.9770641],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.009531044,0.00022948917,0.00008731577,0.00040814653,0.00025169892,0.000033928416,0.0014727211,0.0002086323,0.987777],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997835,0.00019614934,0.00007769219,0.00019858625,0.0011478883,0.0005447694],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99743456,0.00014404069,0.00012827382,0.00027422424,0.00088758924,0.0011312393],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0021217938,0.00059477775,0.0006038265,0.0020457434,0.005801525,0.007853567,0.0012068839,0.0013625356,0.42420784],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0035376241,0.00034523362,0.00034200738,0.0015729871,0.0007630701,0.0023386043,0.004423247,0.002852263,0.17006494],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008983674,0.000037443955,0.00047841264,0.000034703622,0.0000020258192,0.00012505802,0.0002814984,0.000023857001,0.00015739586,0.0044257254,0.97470766,0.019636406],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005820546,0.000016366086,0.0021002414,0.00003401257,0.0000010208739,0.00004907254,0.00032870378,0.000021734128,0.00012205206,0.00014994317,0.99716383,0.00000725754],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04602556,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1307312,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.42420784,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0025488897,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004278274,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.82129765},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7025249688","doi":"","title":"Tracking trends in innovation and mobility","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS)","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"UNESCO Institute for Statistics","funders":"","keywords":"Tracking (education); Tracking system; Radar tracker; Field (mathematics); Global Positioning System","score_opus":0.08824635478450506,"score_gpt":0.3378032517433447,"score_spread":0.24955689695883965,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7025249688","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.427042,0.023051461,0.08793108,0.02237718,0.0012643299,0.00020148902,0.029116053,0.0011629433,0.4078535],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.865895,0.016570594,0.044064153,0.00068085623,0.00038151565,0.0001962589,0.010334476,0.00023006911,0.061647058],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99913305,0.000212288,0.0000748777,0.00018516829,0.00031167938,0.000082939],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99659,0.0016934805,0.00066261546,0.00026414343,0.00063303806,0.00015680217],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018698259,0.00025480325,0.00022044928,0.0057927337,0.00055210147,0.0032388421,0.0005091774,0.0007323651,0.006269044],"category_scores_gemma":[0.010529583,0.00019610651,0.00029692877,0.014672903,0.0004925036,0.006447198,0.0013709723,0.00082605216,0.0020047552],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004703582,0.000055170676,0.16559352,0.00027070395,0.000059432834,0.00007837267,0.0056924294,0.00366841,0.00059351866,0.13206547,0.04363147,0.6482445],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013381875,0.00014107997,0.3375127,0.0012544211,0.0000799526,0.00037120865,0.017483192,0.03332722,0.0031581407,0.15893684,0.44761202,0.00010991146],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.017739,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.034042377,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017739,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0016141974,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015905155,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.035271466},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7027856991","doi":"","title":"Des faits et des sources. Marie-Ève Martel, Pas de lapin dans le chapeau. Coulisses éthiques et déontologiques du travail journalistique, Montréal, Éditions Somme toute, 2023, 150 pages","year":2024,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Érudit (Université de Montréal)","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Diaphragm muscle; Context (archaeology); Archaeomagnetic dating","score_opus":0.01662801743572041,"score_gpt":0.23145910590483337,"score_spread":0.21483108846911297,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7027856991","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0003305408,0.6877385,0.00066327315,0.21012075,0.023117596,0.00003321333,0.00078361016,0.00016455888,0.07704801],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.015462881,0.37179846,0.0019492458,0.04103214,0.017394137,0.00013338207,0.0008492539,0.00058343465,0.55079705],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99715877,0.00055743044,0.00012161109,0.000348268,0.0015847998,0.00022912359],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9948419,0.001586649,0.00030190192,0.00016494717,0.0025796788,0.0005249103],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0027494845,0.0013846575,0.00087555696,0.0024141083,0.0038560084,0.0052278866,0.0017372667,0.0038451601,0.051550623],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009636274,0.00093551824,0.00053730636,0.004312347,0.0026901108,0.0052543585,0.0020431392,0.005672847,0.022671869],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007749962,0.0000051690904,0.00006920152,0.00016396103,0.000002648804,0.00003103993,0.00062673126,0.000011496929,0.000059747905,0.0036046156,0.9779048,0.01751277],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000033251067,0.0000025992601,0.0006040713,0.00047346138,0.0000030496894,0.000057677313,0.00052325573,0.000010905133,0.000052135143,0.0008937886,0.9973687,0.0000069319553],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.297191,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.410529,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.297191,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.009431299,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015321849,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5909223},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7029130710","doi":"","title":"Improving Canadian Indigenous Health: Diabetes &amp; Cardiovascular Disease","year":2018,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"Scholarship@Western (Western University)","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indigenous; Disease; CINAHL; Population; Public health; Diabetes mellitus; Social determinants of health; Population health","score_opus":0.07673275035199353,"score_gpt":0.31356635812983746,"score_spread":0.23683360777784393,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7029130710","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00985013,0.5858444,0.0011510967,0.18790431,0.009093702,0.00041394102,0.0073891236,0.00026076153,0.19809258],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.12857912,0.7862487,0.005705768,0.027522372,0.003875556,0.00045386623,0.0033773696,0.00006518521,0.044172138],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99799997,0.0002550402,0.00013236437,0.00014798935,0.0010597261,0.00040487392],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9938916,0.00061200146,0.00029048382,0.00008009618,0.0041946154,0.0009312713],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023784484,0.0006817751,0.00066146447,0.0036364205,0.0049575996,0.0036823717,0.0012634078,0.0015928434,0.02636345],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0076464307,0.00020313545,0.00083661906,0.0067524086,0.0015875975,0.001375477,0.0018871588,0.0017893243,0.001701423],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000916827,0.00010983033,0.014896389,0.024191951,0.00021931759,0.000500525,0.0033616496,0.00022189955,0.00035266878,0.010765602,0.4775308,0.46775767],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006694795,0.00006742652,0.06831111,0.032258913,0.00048937654,0.00058309484,0.0062988787,0.00019658227,0.00030106847,0.0030157082,0.8883208,0.000089947105],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95320576,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97393453,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.046794236,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03344417,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1508345,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24265552},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7029377444","doi":"","title":"Introduction and Purpose of the Canada-United States Law Institute","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"State (computer science); Government (linguistics); Legislation; Work (physics); Focus (optics)","score_opus":0.008298697639075004,"score_gpt":0.23224592980682573,"score_spread":0.22394723216775073,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7029377444","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00253759,0.047772434,0.0018688706,0.21911494,0.036744554,0.0007301797,0.0039880127,0.0005341029,0.6867092],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.047524855,0.030626597,0.0058282516,0.09610959,0.017189646,0.00075315323,0.002592369,0.00028802123,0.79908764],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99364716,0.00043983516,0.00024677013,0.000766203,0.0036834518,0.0012165348],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98908466,0.0014778792,0.00024031603,0.0004938939,0.0061225793,0.0025806462],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0053072693,0.0010485357,0.0010766381,0.009814149,0.014234229,0.01584786,0.0032020828,0.009735235,0.022183452],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009294303,0.0010706955,0.0010509333,0.007033806,0.008689813,0.004964025,0.0043050563,0.011242345,0.0050191088],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000015574058,0.00004846895,0.0006965156,0.00009004187,0.0000044239205,0.000062986874,0.00028597433,0.0001007359,0.00006490367,0.19606756,0.7747372,0.027825626],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011455422,0.000007713762,0.0030239653,0.00026072867,0.000009659478,0.000032632994,0.00025381142,0.00009709291,0.00006733387,0.004830532,0.99138206,0.00002305477],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8776237,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.91736937,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12237632,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.06711063,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.14929083,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.486924},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7029535576","doi":"","title":"Judicial reliance on the \"Spousal Support Advisory Guidelines\": Spousal support and soft law across Canadian jurisdictions","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"Open MIND","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Government (linguistics); Subject (documents); Derogation; Normative; Legislature; Subpoena","score_opus":0.06771648319441739,"score_gpt":0.3946146651608725,"score_spread":0.32689818196645515,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7029535576","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.7892227,0.0042934357,0.0019218717,0.032665554,0.00015877186,0.00011663875,0.00056599197,0.000042230018,0.17101282],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9921858,0.0010277155,0.00031696085,0.0011596362,0.000014685489,0.000014034443,0.000054004315,0.000010005974,0.005217226],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9912765,0.0008517864,0.00020488055,0.0009120999,0.003947931,0.0028068128],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98475236,0.0041198223,0.0018816985,0.00055004633,0.0063602882,0.002335815],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0045167105,0.00023858881,0.00046953716,0.003283473,0.028685506,0.008998682,0.0028809167,0.0021119076,0.0048573203],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022309424,0.00051056634,0.00032465925,0.006645175,0.019160403,0.0023860943,0.004639355,0.003738607,0.00017864208],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000071536306,0.000072301926,0.08636485,0.00025063107,0.000048477796,0.0008868157,0.25630903,0.00082888885,0.0009552228,0.567373,0.0263381,0.06050119],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000049282546,0.00006060562,0.41181517,0.0011502061,0.00014909088,0.00047380736,0.27638307,0.0025460122,0.0010581089,0.02756909,0.27839237,0.00035325252],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99724317,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99864644,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.84528065,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.15471937,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.24132535,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.98040575},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7029755098","doi":"","title":"L’étranger avec qui je partage ma vie : l’enrichissement injustifié entre conjoints de fait québécois","year":2022,"lang":"fr","type":"dissertation","venue":"Papyrus : Institutional Repository (Université de Montréal)","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Paid work; Power (physics)","score_opus":0.006354703216265444,"score_gpt":0.2029335724650793,"score_spread":0.19657886924881385,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7029755098","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.31140774,0.0049282024,0.0029105193,0.047686454,0.00048175882,0.0000455328,0.00016113002,0.0000380197,0.6323407],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.81829196,0.0011128455,0.0008834139,0.0033336356,0.000031819905,0.000021610978,0.00004563706,0.000031056425,0.1762481],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99850035,0.00045406545,0.000018518123,0.00017232654,0.00029924608,0.0005554436],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990013,0.00018040353,0.0000618851,0.000092123446,0.0003126677,0.0003516554],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013832432,0.00029104634,0.0002490584,0.00067046075,0.02513872,0.00806407,0.0010282364,0.0021901848,0.016333247],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002019135,0.00025159304,0.00026987435,0.0008189006,0.013733153,0.0026716462,0.0038336634,0.0034644802,0.0007106744],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011337388,0.000053456977,0.018744562,0.00009712533,0.00004240458,0.0021207083,0.24120688,0.00037311122,0.0019648816,0.6263586,0.048109908,0.060814954],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013727197,0.0000485769,0.04777512,0.0004570279,0.000049547092,0.0005012987,0.24792364,0.00054474524,0.0011190966,0.025233427,0.6762347,0.00009914282],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.90002555,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97450715,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09997445,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.030702088,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.028648144,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.22276026},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7029794092","doi":"","title":"Laval – Hameau du Grand Grenoux","year":2024,"lang":"fr","type":"other","venue":"Industrias Culturais (Universidade de Coimbra)","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Order (exchange); Suite; Falling (accident)","score_opus":0.02740679818249149,"score_gpt":0.2594777543382265,"score_spread":0.23207095615573503,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7029794092","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.57322085,0.011623919,0.0015482681,0.01144269,0.0005127463,0.00010055455,0.0033775417,0.00041130008,0.39776215],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7031121,0.0021477453,0.0025420797,0.00063300604,0.00011398406,0.00004300998,0.0009479375,0.000105880295,0.29035422],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99968874,0.000060712926,0.0000063567436,0.00006263389,0.00009072178,0.00009092742],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996111,0.000107373584,0.00007215338,0.000029047533,0.00009095451,0.000089391164],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003261278,0.00026123715,0.00012495111,0.00075540994,0.0016809994,0.0020268143,0.000519006,0.0008257984,0.022769758],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007373622,0.00012212846,0.00014182781,0.0009331236,0.0013563262,0.00035129776,0.001170297,0.00059117336,0.0027993014],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00096402294,0.00013770004,0.2103481,0.000927787,0.00009809879,0.008140793,0.038626302,0.001793321,0.019684121,0.10385431,0.094194576,0.52123094],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000015227868,0.000060669314,0.21258791,0.0002219818,0.0000073135643,0.0010222357,0.00800664,0.0002888192,0.002497513,0.0011215442,0.7741439,0.000026355247],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3180043,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.40491876,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3180043,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004374122,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0052944995,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.63230664},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7032991359","doi":"","title":"Parallel proceedings in China, Korea and Japan : a comparative analysis of the development of general international jurisdiction rules","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"Open MIND","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; International investment; Tribunal; Modernization theory","score_opus":0.041812931643262226,"score_gpt":0.3483181780305122,"score_spread":0.30650524638724996,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7032991359","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.76434284,0.0017057102,0.0005892345,0.001320565,0.00004413647,0.000102574566,0.00019786027,0.00004161116,0.2316554],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9846847,0.00064322323,0.00013487283,0.00013158239,0.0000076280107,0.000036762773,0.0001080007,0.000010450605,0.014242695],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.99767596,0.0004010269,0.00010736397,0.00018677828,0.000762917,0.0008658973],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99576557,0.00093585486,0.00070297194,0.0003236789,0.00149707,0.0007747832],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025530378,0.00014171237,0.00033419285,0.002698747,0.0033109619,0.0052297423,0.0011747456,0.0006687581,0.011064441],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007981295,0.00024211738,0.00041910517,0.004431553,0.0027376646,0.0024563966,0.002428212,0.00095399056,0.00042155135],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005801033,0.0003001705,0.08546564,0.0006715852,0.00020568418,0.002737166,0.074875824,0.005779632,0.0017861794,0.68208224,0.024400648,0.121115066],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023005287,0.00036666408,0.53989536,0.0004819552,0.00058808277,0.00030767717,0.10699727,0.0065078693,0.00278765,0.04703121,0.29464453,0.00016168391],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13853341,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14745998,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13853341,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012234595,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012928557,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2754541},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7037944048","doi":"","title":"Final decision in the Laval case","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Lund University Publications (Lund University)","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Nucleofection; Gestational period; TSG101; Dysgeusia; Liquation; Diafiltration; Emperipolesis; Triacetin; Demotion","score_opus":0.025886503183038378,"score_gpt":0.2662477812073222,"score_spread":0.2403612780242838,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7037944048","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04082437,0.0028047021,0.0026500425,0.46439216,0.015616858,0.0002711201,0.00067191693,0.00013722977,0.47263166],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.35647735,0.0011285985,0.0030634168,0.19088554,0.0060735852,0.00037202876,0.000369369,0.00023202998,0.44139802],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9882776,0.0019488985,0.000731715,0.001642049,0.0025388908,0.004860841],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99335515,0.0026394762,0.00019815526,0.00050311023,0.0019981794,0.0013059902],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009201594,0.0006544605,0.00097548845,0.0015042021,0.013049279,0.014390815,0.0043459046,0.04033464,0.022450684],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02919487,0.0007488935,0.0021389,0.0007531978,0.007760811,0.005560844,0.006875457,0.018343758,0.0043040058],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00023471226,0.00009233777,0.0016913712,0.00009065747,0.00007069904,0.0045056543,0.004426679,0.00037335913,0.00052069617,0.63427436,0.34347504,0.010244373],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010284747,0.000041049105,0.0015211857,0.00037110338,0.00009622711,0.0011226814,0.0068498123,0.00044126052,0.0009537092,0.1008912,0.88749075,0.000118165],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.061292145,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.081312954,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.061292145,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010217529,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.019140461,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.121870756},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7038179209","doi":"","title":"Harmonizing jurisdiction in transnational cases: a deep comparative inquiry","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"eScholarship@McGill (McGill)","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Discretion; Common law; Judicial discretion; Equity (law); Legal culture; Comparative law; Legal research; Judicial opinion","score_opus":0.09793150739387599,"score_gpt":0.3262352736123033,"score_spread":0.22830376621842732,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7038179209","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.8199008,0.0028443034,0.0130625,0.0030148872,0.00004244856,0.000105801,0.0000580063,0.000016629197,0.16095465],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99670863,0.0004472705,0.0016043881,0.00016071544,0.000006980069,0.000034450644,0.000030396903,0.000007810822,0.000999191],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9897396,0.0068358257,0.00037360212,0.0008067105,0.0012034437,0.001040897],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9870207,0.008537451,0.0012109505,0.0011538905,0.0016938591,0.00038313225],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.010988343,0.00020635733,0.0006526846,0.0043398635,0.0064504403,0.008351793,0.0019663172,0.0021925557,0.006782344],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020280786,0.00031868697,0.0005286527,0.005379307,0.016725691,0.015787065,0.007849975,0.0030870112,0.0002184444],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005126917,0.000121797086,0.012824826,0.00022409133,0.00006680641,0.0009667304,0.16409132,0.0012064388,0.0009977316,0.7819078,0.00074597023,0.036795225],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000026256812,0.00014390338,0.04605802,0.0011334346,0.0001187113,0.0009370802,0.6651371,0.005132896,0.0014181249,0.22048785,0.059350785,0.000055838682],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.016940631,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.033262484,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.016940631,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0075446875,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002062298,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05811256},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7043408338","doi":"","title":"3.5 S. Woodson Canada, University of Missouri Registra","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Blue Tiger Commons (Lincoln University - Missouri)","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Work (physics); Watt; Government (linguistics)","score_opus":0.03332698040260732,"score_gpt":0.23181438822902775,"score_spread":0.19848740782642044,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7043408338","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.02096209,0.01460776,0.002702195,0.22278965,0.014525029,0.0006848596,0.0032257608,0.0010313869,0.7194713],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.020041583,0.0012370796,0.0007189862,0.022029584,0.0003638981,0.00010924687,0.00019607677,0.00007326623,0.9552303],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9979334,0.00019568307,0.00010583608,0.00026306784,0.00063063734,0.0008713675],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966221,0.00037082902,0.00009002269,0.00011261768,0.0020449804,0.00075935025],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019806686,0.00066538615,0.00034392372,0.0011171843,0.022213032,0.004570264,0.0012971028,0.008454381,0.072790585],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0043852855,0.001120601,0.0004912349,0.0008389013,0.0015324433,0.0013987928,0.0021499188,0.006226554,0.019735178],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003719278,0.000047368525,0.0024892616,0.00006411278,0.00000598165,0.00039221568,0.0014931553,0.00007882217,0.00056973135,0.024413647,0.947992,0.022416525],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000010173956,0.000015811322,0.0069548725,0.00010997665,0.000011755816,0.00008595078,0.0025145642,0.00013832498,0.00032464004,0.000858349,0.9889508,0.000024741808],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.73488915,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.91295314,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.92720944,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.011439539,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.045413874,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.53334427},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7066330393","doi":"","title":"Ideas of Spousal Support Entitlement","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Entitlement (fair division); Affect (linguistics); Duration (music); Supreme court; Child support","score_opus":0.014746999171852637,"score_gpt":0.2860893629103817,"score_spread":0.27134236373852905,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7066330393","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.034454428,0.007316952,0.052331526,0.11320473,0.0012797199,0.00010371991,0.00019453176,0.000059564278,0.7910547],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94246715,0.0027307998,0.007975085,0.01002007,0.0014066139,0.00027651052,0.000138753,0.000058657897,0.0349263],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9958117,0.001815721,0.00014802608,0.0005925043,0.0010355014,0.0005965685],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974783,0.0010951712,0.0002718215,0.0002699043,0.0004974648,0.0003872304],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006757303,0.00052921835,0.00032364778,0.0034287875,0.006268759,0.0068009193,0.00218546,0.0048660017,0.007269271],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008438953,0.00028799844,0.0006254784,0.0017782816,0.03211641,0.01198121,0.0048144567,0.0059902705,0.0007352018],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000013692814,0.000002233753,0.000042919233,0.0000027057145,4.6520415e-7,0.000014665994,0.0005714826,0.000031097486,0.000005574223,0.99821836,0.0004994748,0.00060963316],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000063388816,0.000009589068,0.00029763966,0.00005984869,0.0000034721158,0.000081510974,0.0014083746,0.00035161246,0.000024446737,0.94798905,0.049760178,0.000008033971],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0053023347,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002836298,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.007304427,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007304427,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003949545,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05299759},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7067131376","doi":"","title":"L’accord en médiation en Belgique, cadre juridique et considérations pratiques","year":2021,"lang":"fr","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Digital Access to Libraries (Université catholique de Louvain (UCL), l'Université de Namur (UNamur) and the Université Saint-Louis (USL-B))","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Subpoena; Identity (music); Legitimacy","score_opus":0.013944414052310122,"score_gpt":0.23254694566351775,"score_spread":0.21860253161120763,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7067131376","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.023126299,0.070720136,0.0013715276,0.0374999,0.0019040096,0.000027354175,0.0001016775,0.00006195311,0.86518705],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.41353673,0.013724084,0.0010158045,0.0041746544,0.00046986344,0.000033531476,0.00006445517,0.000064439555,0.5669163],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9984314,0.00062651566,0.000020750798,0.00010460995,0.00032900646,0.00048776614],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996302,0.00012146327,0.000041911342,0.000018062912,0.00008573363,0.00010263938],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013402177,0.00032562143,0.00027151575,0.0009558995,0.0076919845,0.006541077,0.00070161256,0.0023174193,0.01052543],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0015664368,0.00016706262,0.00025392606,0.0016665863,0.007748381,0.001373535,0.0015714354,0.002784278,0.0013916986],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002779107,0.000025802694,0.0006907388,0.000096449854,0.0000060525404,0.0002305485,0.023758521,0.0002585098,0.00028104655,0.81095564,0.1297024,0.03396639],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000004522947,0.000008562998,0.0020687322,0.00017029111,0.000003313145,0.00010130342,0.007254745,0.0000743785,0.00008840031,0.0076330206,0.9825832,0.000009414916],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.30209804,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4524708,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.30209804,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.017361788,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015207904,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6006793},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7071856384","doi":"","title":"Unintended Consequences: The New Test for Interlocutory Mandatory Injunctions","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Interlocutory; Prima facie; Test (biology); Supreme court; High Court","score_opus":0.02572105252229743,"score_gpt":0.3053892936091394,"score_spread":0.27966824108684196,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7071856384","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.11162442,0.0039863014,0.22414355,0.17394546,0.008436337,0.0010825065,0.0025692692,0.0004743173,0.4737378],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.88749444,0.0009741805,0.039211616,0.04347374,0.0028784696,0.0009024134,0.00040200466,0.000103202794,0.024560057],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.94225514,0.017797174,0.0041702245,0.007267661,0.024303794,0.0042061196],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.83006364,0.13112561,0.009026088,0.013007919,0.013553852,0.0032229163],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04548688,0.0008014342,0.0018188519,0.0029204504,0.0036491998,0.0075360197,0.005646841,0.016095186,0.01196001],"category_scores_gemma":[0.16018006,0.0005843822,0.0023289432,0.0014296984,0.01967759,0.015606039,0.006041492,0.016924122,0.0015947425],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000294958,0.00017274475,0.006191988,0.00013314682,0.00009667368,0.001242422,0.0008126417,0.0015654835,0.00083723885,0.94043577,0.015852101,0.032364782],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004236155,0.00041313685,0.0070304265,0.0005319849,0.00018840359,0.0019571108,0.00058089086,0.010114087,0.0021899377,0.91427386,0.06204353,0.0002529316],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0053097215,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0070994156,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04548688,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0052571953,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.011595865,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24056047},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7072474066","doi":"","title":"Why Solar Energy is Taking Over Edmonton","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"other","venue":"","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"","score_opus":0.019386760246559904,"score_gpt":0.30965148255495406,"score_spread":0.2902647223083942,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7072474066","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004727289,0.0033261713,0.00018620046,0.14614029,0.0025646954,0.000014591719,0.0001719188,0.00007168733,0.8427973],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.05294913,0.0017671513,0.00031817597,0.06096278,0.0006370399,0.000026595031,0.00010550426,0.00014225178,0.8830914],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99890995,0.00013829711,0.000018967432,0.00010863837,0.00033782626,0.00048634596],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99895585,0.0003294478,0.00004874337,0.0000729518,0.00031596175,0.0002770709],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014291593,0.00025818506,0.00022466728,0.0005326262,0.008999716,0.0070025846,0.0011077236,0.010176034,0.092579484],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004250835,0.00024548016,0.00045398064,0.00046083494,0.0025276248,0.0023978986,0.0028320665,0.006508058,0.0077545173],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000018531118,0.000022599335,0.0007180948,0.000034031098,0.0000064735527,0.00026747986,0.0010259792,0.00009250912,0.00013807553,0.30794498,0.66795087,0.021780396],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000068813997,0.000002963189,0.0011158201,0.00012571547,0.0000049002742,0.00006971609,0.0013672905,0.00006925963,0.00012687304,0.013208384,0.98389184,0.000010388851],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.32304645,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5188435,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.67695355,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008198632,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.016061315,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6423322},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7095553874","doi":"","title":"of Surfaces by Self-Assembly Par","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Limiting; Center (category theory)","score_opus":0.01065489390609067,"score_gpt":0.2737166963962663,"score_spread":0.26306180249017563,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7095553874","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.45737475,0.011039475,0.27742466,0.0031671752,0.0043216352,0.00069551513,0.00068337977,0.0028444792,0.24244882],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8173398,0.0026901423,0.037968244,0.0007370726,0.0002767409,0.00037276227,0.0007593378,0.0005772541,0.13927875],"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9993594,0.00006211035,0.000021295775,0.00014966718,0.00026437955,0.000143174],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99977046,0.000054085354,0.0000356511,0.00005760327,0.00005104613,0.000031232485],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00025973114,0.00053009455,0.0005250128,0.0006741356,0.00089417887,0.0015077385,0.0007077445,0.0007104374,0.020979295],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006729458,0.0005273437,0.00082443265,0.00032203313,0.00062620646,0.000996004,0.0016194298,0.00086216774,0.004480587],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00031082548,0.0003090455,0.0022318263,0.0016023983,0.00024518283,0.0018174894,0.0018398721,0.042967398,0.45456854,0.252454,0.048556898,0.19309646],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00032400206,0.0007098837,0.004179584,0.0002254166,0.0000901555,0.0014015614,0.0009090052,0.22560403,0.3512714,0.07459754,0.34054482,0.00014273197],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0010030736,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0021161938,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9790207,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007322629,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00037831388,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07018268},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7095654883","doi":"","title":"Frequently Used Databases Database Name","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Trademark; Statute; Statutory law; European union; Intellectual property; Legal research; Legislature; Variety (cybernetics)","score_opus":0.10245657323432875,"score_gpt":0.3354239558571542,"score_spread":0.23296738262282543,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7095654883","genre_codex":"dataset","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.001641776,0.003310757,0.018027434,0.0013033908,0.000607808,0.0008106518,0.8923144,0.024102906,0.057880916],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.006225015,0.0028350302,0.02270251,0.00095480005,0.00021820446,0.0012852491,0.9407628,0.005959413,0.019056972],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.990995,0.0014029396,0.0032490573,0.0014945783,0.002376578,0.00048181848],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9781668,0.0060562952,0.0018068864,0.0052031605,0.007564549,0.0012023344],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037937004,0.0018980335,0.0025148464,0.02295367,0.0024159912,0.011771456,0.0046271086,0.0026793987,0.1678785],"category_scores_gemma":[0.044914722,0.0010607869,0.0011677069,0.03951283,0.0004957672,0.010326076,0.00402248,0.0022841198,0.19833216],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021901308,0.00005002497,0.00088135264,0.0018593771,0.000047088408,0.00015239166,0.00024140494,0.00025902083,0.0005554403,0.010175444,0.91206443,0.07349505],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005213614,0.000014968556,0.0009080551,0.00047568453,0.000028221633,0.00025022053,0.00022060247,0.00059222535,0.00094765594,0.004064439,0.99240655,0.00003914578],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0046019056,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0029577932,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8321215,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0021590877,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004140876,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5616095},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7096080617","doi":"","title":"CEPS Special Report/March 2009","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Temptation; Legislation; Supreme court; Interpretation (philosophy); Human rights; Relation (database); Hearsay","score_opus":0.06926705941248526,"score_gpt":0.3580854265485957,"score_spread":0.2888183671361104,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7096080617","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0027246017,0.004249076,0.00083551655,0.01012046,0.007747458,0.00045651034,0.06014621,0.0012146335,0.91250557],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.00792364,0.003638798,0.001874397,0.0014803286,0.0012623881,0.00017365412,0.040687162,0.0006649864,0.9422946],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99853206,0.000102652244,0.000093514354,0.00017628,0.0008949613,0.00020045559],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99557143,0.00043639867,0.00017395937,0.0005829068,0.0026809983,0.00055428344],"candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019576252,0.0006697831,0.00059902493,0.0041194176,0.0019472371,0.004825019,0.0015732964,0.0017933719,0.29624495],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0046520354,0.00050129346,0.0005694423,0.0036042538,0.00040901205,0.0020044376,0.0018219176,0.0019580054,0.16263598],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005172209,0.000052154952,0.00047478813,0.00007580979,0.0000028572626,0.000057237594,0.00005294496,0.00007549687,0.0001379786,0.004454486,0.96876156,0.025803149],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000071179197,0.000008136877,0.0015408621,0.000089769426,0.0000021114383,0.00002587831,0.000079075406,0.000057193032,0.00013185025,0.00051190116,0.9975414,0.0000046578357],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06066515,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.085742936,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.703755,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003771296,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008073329,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9910381},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7099389732","doi":"","title":"www.publish.csiro.au/journals/ijwf International Journal of Wildland Fire, 2006, 15, 87–97 Spatio-temporal analysis of wildfire ignitions in the St Johns River Water Management District, Florida","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Arson; Lightning (connector); Cluster analysis; Hydrology (agriculture); Wildland–urban interface; Index (typography)","score_opus":0.019720472726035096,"score_gpt":0.2831614331698858,"score_spread":0.2634409604438507,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7099389732","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.12708998,0.008977572,0.021184238,0.007149457,0.0026758013,0.00023603503,0.09611208,0.0027496137,0.7338251],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.32088464,0.016140997,0.026783472,0.0012443699,0.0008002853,0.00010926931,0.04173489,0.002284807,0.59001726],"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99981743,0.000017514043,0.000021112817,0.000025080746,0.00009635085,0.000022659733],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986563,0.00024649934,0.0001558822,0.00023878347,0.0004910368,0.00021155868],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00036500322,0.0002379865,0.0003181266,0.002898383,0.0006489748,0.0025334829,0.00045949532,0.0003579734,0.15857813],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0017053352,0.0002616856,0.00021124409,0.0069446107,0.0003807416,0.0010310177,0.00043999328,0.00040534785,0.046103988],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00011302354,0.00016039834,0.038659092,0.00072453637,0.000073225565,0.00027846234,0.00063916517,0.003243532,0.0020763988,0.002469557,0.44983074,0.5017318],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028177352,0.000071526745,0.17421606,0.00042346262,0.000047452908,0.0005970507,0.0019260125,0.005656834,0.0037239043,0.00275667,0.81048274,0.000070178154],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11659125,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.23298608,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.15857813,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0010962966,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0020402884,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5304967},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7100315909","doi":"","title":"SHORT COMMUNICATION ANALYSIS OF GEOMORPHOLOGY CITATIONS IN THE LAST QUARTER OF THE 20TH CENTURY","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Quarter (Canadian coin); Landform; Multidisciplinary approach; Citation; Citation analysis; Scientific communication; Bibliometrics","score_opus":0.024848649251201532,"score_gpt":0.3195211932315428,"score_spread":0.29467254398034126,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7100315909","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.53052413,0.07596853,0.0032354381,0.009580457,0.0084044635,0.00025915456,0.27413458,0.00068741885,0.09720587],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.83538383,0.030906133,0.0030086953,0.00068153004,0.0062793125,0.00027613272,0.09145645,0.00016679805,0.031841133],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.99546695,0.00031862681,0.00094877154,0.0004209564,0.0026020822,0.00024263117],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9533936,0.014648997,0.014756374,0.0011029033,0.014526254,0.0015718791],"candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0020114502,0.00026692465,0.00057248847,0.045641214,0.000780989,0.0029903685,0.00055075414,0.00061035436,0.01811175],"category_scores_gemma":[0.039854936,0.00010394794,0.00036303367,0.08352785,0.0004675916,0.0021063867,0.0013373004,0.00038958158,0.0039763055],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00035716553,0.00006935436,0.47251707,0.0044062124,0.00045300307,0.000769603,0.0054549426,0.00077130983,0.0008435078,0.007793387,0.19485526,0.31170917],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000023332545,0.00011414154,0.8158155,0.00073040806,0.00023386019,0.0011787069,0.0028451602,0.0007893159,0.0008291579,0.0025650556,0.174813,0.000062372266],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006612949,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0057865307,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9979885,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001501058,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0019896983,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06058979},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7103289453","doi":"","title":"Compensation for Extraordinary Rendition: AComparative Study and the Need for a Domestic Cause ofAction in the United States","year":2014,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"Scholarly Commons (University of the Pacific)","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Action (physics); Compensation (psychology); Cause of action; Government (linguistics); Legislation","score_opus":0.044349013234526155,"score_gpt":0.29114056827476587,"score_spread":0.2467915550402397,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7103289453","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9393273,0.0011675091,0.00014038777,0.03724763,0.00024215343,0.000026846035,0.00009443057,0.000005437162,0.021748153],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9957045,0.00041077248,0.00005777348,0.0020326367,0.000053701307,0.000011096083,0.0000424125,0.000003138031,0.0016840257],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.995739,0.0014667719,0.0002457783,0.0001963324,0.0005913811,0.001760709],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98555064,0.005195715,0.0046406193,0.0006420865,0.001790393,0.002180538],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0037824684,0.00017196151,0.00025053287,0.0015008278,0.007928068,0.0034135997,0.0012124273,0.0029978356,0.008488594],"category_scores_gemma":[0.020312577,0.00028155692,0.00036767192,0.0016387547,0.0035360104,0.002856659,0.0051290477,0.0041573904,0.00019671235],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00017362511,0.000620625,0.80574274,0.00015528532,0.00006021511,0.002414585,0.060669158,0.00033305216,0.00023539785,0.04491261,0.027591096,0.05709156],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002783522,0.00010518605,0.51359856,0.00051095424,0.000050256964,0.0012059889,0.43301138,0.00078361784,0.00033729716,0.005931043,0.044385098,0.00005275641],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.056564886,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.19673854,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.056564886,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0044371975,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008845963,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.11247128},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7104253091","doi":"10.71781/1858","title":"Le droit de l'OHADA face au commerce électronique","year":2011,"lang":"fr","type":"dissertation","venue":"Papyrus : Institutional Repository (Université de Montréal)","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Face (sociological concept); Context (archaeology); Legal certainty","score_opus":0.007986705366992987,"score_gpt":0.19569668302031107,"score_spread":0.1877099776533181,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7104253091","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.055606574,0.018014004,0.020599535,0.099752404,0.00255456,0.000054783373,0.0001544674,0.00006697001,0.80319667],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8113813,0.014348531,0.0051770825,0.011370476,0.00081829674,0.00009896818,0.00010629995,0.000076912314,0.15662217],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9950749,0.0017408575,0.00015565119,0.0005496968,0.00174203,0.00073681265],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99623775,0.0017724247,0.00030098978,0.00048312446,0.00096099556,0.00024473306],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039047864,0.00036477798,0.00047831,0.0015386282,0.009028778,0.018395226,0.0014485326,0.0051160757,0.018190213],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006789874,0.00036082973,0.00047329522,0.0019480444,0.019200489,0.0114682345,0.0058158226,0.0053017037,0.0016573044],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011391418,0.0000051472516,0.00044255785,0.00008166799,0.000004180482,0.00018529435,0.007023741,0.00012665379,0.00015297701,0.98065096,0.004407852,0.0069075716],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012926725,0.000027495262,0.0028630865,0.0010830441,0.000016361557,0.000599846,0.032686953,0.0003222074,0.00052620063,0.23120983,0.7306106,0.00004138679],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04201283,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.046014566,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04201283,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010405201,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008988236,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.083536625},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7104288863","doi":"10.71781/2227","title":"Parallel proceedings in China, Korea and Japan : a comparative analysis of the development of general international jurisdiction rules","year":2021,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"Papyrus : Institutional Repository (Université de Montréal)","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; International investment; Tribunal; Modernization theory","score_opus":0.008776333270194175,"score_gpt":0.22722466177456146,"score_spread":0.2184483285043673,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7104288863","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.76434284,0.0017057102,0.0005892345,0.001320565,0.00004413647,0.000102574566,0.00019786027,0.00004161116,0.2316554],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9846847,0.00064322323,0.00013487283,0.00013158239,0.0000076280107,0.000036762773,0.0001080007,0.000010450605,0.014242695],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99767596,0.0004010269,0.00010736397,0.00018677828,0.000762917,0.0008658973],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99576557,0.00093585486,0.00070297194,0.0003236789,0.00149707,0.0007747832],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0025530378,0.00014171237,0.00033419285,0.002698747,0.0033109619,0.0052297423,0.0011747456,0.0006687581,0.011064441],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007981295,0.00024211738,0.00041910517,0.004431553,0.0027376646,0.0024563966,0.002428212,0.00095399056,0.00042155135],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005801033,0.0003001705,0.08546564,0.0006715852,0.00020568418,0.002737166,0.074875824,0.005779632,0.0017861794,0.68208224,0.024400648,0.121115066],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00023005287,0.00036666408,0.53989536,0.0004819552,0.00058808277,0.00030767717,0.10699727,0.0065078693,0.00278765,0.04703121,0.29464453,0.00016168391],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.13853341,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.14745998,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.13853341,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.012234595,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012928557,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2754541},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7112575025","doi":"","title":"Financial Leasing (Uniform Law)","year":2017,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Factoring; Convention; Personal property; Scope (computer science); Property (philosophy); Real estate","score_opus":0.026287140270579237,"score_gpt":0.29461645729310487,"score_spread":0.26832931702252566,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7112575025","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0025110561,0.0022014566,0.005333005,0.004574425,0.0007815314,0.00028988838,0.0011350573,0.0003445584,0.98282915],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.08911781,0.0023649745,0.010175452,0.013105447,0.0008699762,0.0006252119,0.0018471421,0.00027188778,0.88162214],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.9871891,0.0014057215,0.0013261806,0.002025129,0.0060798447,0.001974056],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9952415,0.0007443389,0.00034247022,0.0011454234,0.0023027747,0.00022351816],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006282958,0.0008741748,0.0006676392,0.0019363352,0.0050731874,0.010171391,0.0018799996,0.0069087897,0.04507832],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013562201,0.0008328687,0.0008170242,0.0020212654,0.0035951652,0.0047051758,0.0036332961,0.0058865296,0.019250318],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000028866953,0.000038508126,0.0005179347,0.00008905064,0.0000060386437,0.00013531443,0.0004717882,0.00019587603,0.00035424955,0.79873765,0.15785599,0.04156884],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012895413,0.00002668246,0.0013689935,0.00017123195,0.00000683573,0.00017903227,0.00008062302,0.00017336507,0.00036983684,0.02036816,0.9772111,0.000031232048],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0980271,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.10736463,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0980271,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0071500195,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.012985835,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19491303},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7112905474","doi":"","title":"(Un)regulation of extraordinary expenses for children in family crises: comparative insights from the canadian model","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Nova Science Publishers (Nova Science Publishers, Inc.)","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Discretion; Appeal; Legislation; Normative; Perspective (graphical); Balance (ability); Best practice","score_opus":0.08572185253320347,"score_gpt":0.34796822781738856,"score_spread":0.2622463752841851,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7112905474","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18377732,0.0049502044,0.0041023274,0.015009968,0.00006904845,0.00008693179,0.00035546065,0.000038073133,0.79161066],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.986912,0.0030938475,0.0015110951,0.0005182091,0.00001799993,0.000027550148,0.00007950717,0.000010675208,0.007829073],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9974675,0.00057627686,0.000052023337,0.00018307674,0.0008832888,0.0008377961],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9981115,0.00051866093,0.00024381156,0.00016304298,0.0007110654,0.00025200768],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0023004704,0.000283065,0.0002688663,0.002731281,0.008544597,0.0051548677,0.0015137504,0.0012682509,0.003975971],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0052418467,0.00017741614,0.00035244835,0.003988723,0.0097672455,0.0016599504,0.0022729426,0.0010527109,0.00017506554],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000023968105,0.000018971708,0.0053457567,0.00006969235,0.0000074999625,0.00029622146,0.015104809,0.001284485,0.00021441141,0.9580536,0.0051563815,0.014424213],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000060794213,0.00010141655,0.13341404,0.0011910168,0.00021062691,0.0011379913,0.14245543,0.011411049,0.0011220672,0.19769786,0.51096565,0.00023211623],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.95599985,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.97543883,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08654158,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08654158,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.072673135,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.627906},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7118503195","doi":"10.4324/9781003080510-4/douez-facebook-privacy-class-actions-janet-walker?context=ubx&amp;refid=634613d3-10f5-4cae-9aa7-41495e1453ec","title":"Douez v Facebook and Privacy Class Actions","year":2020,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Waiver; Doctrine; Supreme court; Relevance (law); Class (philosophy); Field (mathematics); Face (sociological concept)","score_opus":0.04194384660272514,"score_gpt":0.2977682073778901,"score_spread":0.25582436077516496,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7118503195","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.061032206,0.0022696054,0.0013237367,0.07155283,0.00045750564,0.000074300195,0.00016517928,0.000040181996,0.8630845],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.79054916,0.0011450056,0.0005259178,0.05606222,0.00021465897,0.000111758214,0.000058271977,0.000026275908,0.1513067],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9965312,0.00055826455,0.00006542281,0.00034530173,0.0010094732,0.0014903406],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983431,0.0009305663,0.00009758173,0.00009455826,0.00027211997,0.00026208736],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0018047909,0.00030893894,0.00025233586,0.0008633285,0.019818218,0.006669478,0.0012510938,0.009567751,0.007423445],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005358427,0.0003389717,0.00045857448,0.0007335736,0.009622563,0.0032403036,0.0044085477,0.005646785,0.00066322216],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000020624075,0.00002127017,0.0022200055,0.00001912962,0.0000061794144,0.0005901201,0.0064984136,0.00011589382,0.00019293922,0.94506484,0.039059125,0.0061914288],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005995629,0.000035561876,0.00863824,0.0003969967,0.000054259992,0.00069575035,0.022552224,0.0011261974,0.0021678212,0.10597699,0.8581893,0.0001067833],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.58932865,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7308772,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.58932865,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015333351,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.014787484,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.82617974},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7119558353","doi":"","title":"Private International Law in Common Law Canada: Cases, Text and Materials, 5th Edition","year":2022,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"eYLS (Yale Law School)","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Casebook; Conflict of laws; Private law; Common law; Public law; Comparative law; Municipal law; Jurisdiction; Civil law (Civil law)","score_opus":0.01533587482708051,"score_gpt":0.2638613333295441,"score_spread":0.24852545850246358,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7119558353","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.002753118,0.07082983,0.005393964,0.019466562,0.012224353,0.001084946,0.014143625,0.0014359807,0.8726676],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.015311208,0.07340217,0.008869193,0.010087084,0.0021399483,0.00082728046,0.012785791,0.0007111822,0.8758661],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998085,0.00013642345,0.000103178456,0.000103688835,0.0013282287,0.00024350744],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964694,0.000987329,0.00018322909,0.00019952575,0.0018714579,0.0002891472],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0014137803,0.0014260678,0.0008072936,0.0074208067,0.0049700113,0.0052964385,0.002645242,0.002200156,0.053794038],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0056827865,0.0009487813,0.0003991115,0.012549576,0.003191879,0.0032787416,0.0020531847,0.0025938326,0.018285742],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000023683442,0.000014379078,0.00006855225,0.00007458676,7.391645e-7,0.000028207825,0.00020890603,0.00017302425,0.000053636308,0.011708306,0.9665104,0.021156956],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000001260085,0.0000024715212,0.00045019557,0.0001548891,9.191484e-7,0.00003235546,0.00017510657,0.00005639498,0.000025749863,0.001299251,0.99779403,0.0000073064402],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.80055964,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.88095826,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.19944036,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.031117275,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.061039124,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4012298},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128193979","doi":"10.3138/ccar_v2i2_279","title":"Les Recours Collectifs Et Le Droit International Privé Au Québec","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Government (linguistics); Work (physics); Context (archaeology); Power (physics)","score_opus":0.05604269264827971,"score_gpt":0.36310665143519066,"score_spread":0.30706395878691095,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128193979","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.029695055,0.76492596,0.00069217384,0.049802836,0.0033350594,0.00016093177,0.004155959,0.000054935143,0.14717706],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3792063,0.495815,0.0016926293,0.0134073375,0.0008877988,0.00026847195,0.0028089709,0.00008071768,0.105832756],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99261004,0.0012481555,0.0003998166,0.0004087998,0.00395022,0.001382915],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98251224,0.004049942,0.0012399565,0.00026998567,0.010934385,0.0009934288],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007896992,0.0006292336,0.0009380561,0.0088092685,0.00566969,0.0061579156,0.0019927486,0.0019797846,0.007963479],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014568578,0.00045983752,0.00063072116,0.0143879475,0.0026752492,0.0015138505,0.00095023104,0.0028139534,0.00040033087],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00029721943,0.000097830794,0.019073961,0.006435412,0.00045428713,0.00030721942,0.005570404,0.002462125,0.000492974,0.15710743,0.4685655,0.3391357],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004517297,0.000031649608,0.056332704,0.004108851,0.00020474175,0.000062027895,0.0031376358,0.000204128,0.00030391206,0.0013958092,0.93411803,0.0000553908],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9925781,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9948862,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.08295029,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.08295029,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.21366201,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.60184926},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128195529","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v8i2.203","title":"A Real and Substantial Look at Jurisdiction in the Civil and Class Action Settings","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"Centre de réadaptation Lethbridge-Layton-Mackay","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Supreme court; Original jurisdiction; Statutory law; Class action; Subject-matter jurisdiction; Action (physics); Class (philosophy); Civil procedure","score_opus":0.03344623111615447,"score_gpt":0.310251943957258,"score_spread":0.27680571284110356,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128195529","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.09559697,0.019817239,0.01100329,0.13681579,0.0006367851,0.000096878364,0.00014503277,0.000034982073,0.7358531],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98707134,0.0015162207,0.0011835035,0.004423248,0.00013464772,0.000028765486,0.000019482346,0.000009539603,0.005613215],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9781245,0.009144873,0.00052424194,0.00205428,0.005047992,0.005104029],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9858518,0.009001678,0.0009272704,0.00089777115,0.0015509394,0.0017705916],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012683614,0.0002900541,0.00068157795,0.00282768,0.019233963,0.015538315,0.0031722847,0.0076124985,0.0056551816],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021892454,0.0004164131,0.0006871249,0.0021656859,0.08068017,0.008927511,0.008469912,0.012234912,0.00029615188],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000020354091,0.0000048621678,0.00039797314,0.00001573296,0.0000031392876,0.00009277929,0.0047791656,0.00005302056,0.000055631303,0.99011844,0.001022453,0.0034548193],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024053035,0.000060833085,0.010500591,0.000711716,0.000039324317,0.0005653941,0.03227796,0.0004206038,0.0003995023,0.76675135,0.18813552,0.000113042595],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.41079926,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6070435,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.41079926,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.031868454,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.044269994,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.81681633},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128215102","doi":"10.3138/ccar_v2i2_217","title":"Protecting Canadian Plaintiffs in International Class Actions: The Need for A Principled Approach in Light of <i>Currie V. Mcdonald’s Restaurants of Canada Ltd.</i>","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Plaintiff; Class (philosophy); World class; Class action; Government (linguistics)","score_opus":0.05043083678692827,"score_gpt":0.32353347706725993,"score_spread":0.27310264028033165,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128215102","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004669743,0.06157951,0.002823016,0.7903917,0.005754165,0.00018268464,0.0005416346,0.00009244121,0.13396513],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.15985377,0.0625738,0.013337705,0.697136,0.004073398,0.00029482282,0.0006127121,0.00013720161,0.0619807],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.96267277,0.0040723193,0.0015456352,0.0020758738,0.022201704,0.007431792],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.95696557,0.015584928,0.0015963911,0.00095825165,0.021664778,0.003230068],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.026460856,0.0012290189,0.0014471917,0.005499097,0.024027646,0.021393133,0.008591596,0.03237391,0.0042117424],"category_scores_gemma":[0.056708053,0.0011846151,0.0020448996,0.0065369485,0.017637093,0.0075162523,0.0034536186,0.03001287,0.000679026],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021364543,0.000023162434,0.0012191903,0.00062365714,0.000045485293,0.0003048826,0.0037214493,0.00039302438,0.0003137641,0.39907587,0.56740654,0.026851634],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000051167313,0.000036078236,0.0070556337,0.0024778529,0.00023641772,0.00018726008,0.0050854124,0.0005149105,0.00060598366,0.033658348,0.94988453,0.00020641321],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98128307,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9933536,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1123309,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.1123309,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.38938457,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8150215},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128236326","doi":"10.3138/ccar.v6i2.431","title":"Certification Rates in Ontario Versus The Rest of Canada: Why the Disparity?","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Class Action Review","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Certification; Rest (music); Plaintiff; Consistency (knowledge bases); Class action; Common law; Action (physics)","score_opus":0.07727410158364759,"score_gpt":0.32370167984862935,"score_spread":0.24642757826498177,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128236326","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.62418205,0.09561233,0.0018221413,0.10113865,0.0016113239,0.00043891938,0.027975313,0.00014878601,0.14707042],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9779373,0.010340281,0.00053990696,0.0046016187,0.00016598188,0.00008916421,0.0034140195,0.00004980544,0.0028618649],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.98551244,0.0012296174,0.0013029522,0.0014317262,0.007693425,0.002829759],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.94041216,0.0058342633,0.0080562,0.001448027,0.039231393,0.005017961],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.012286496,0.00026350372,0.00084779074,0.009198299,0.0035108945,0.0036137993,0.0024472973,0.0009924769,0.003595078],"category_scores_gemma":[0.045362577,0.00039251838,0.00057151937,0.015218456,0.0029120469,0.0016291164,0.001604064,0.0012040294,0.00021176298],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00041837464,0.00008134909,0.69003695,0.002980855,0.0005597422,0.000558212,0.021305341,0.0006852905,0.0010509515,0.026389832,0.10419104,0.151742],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000028106668,0.000026002972,0.9566933,0.000787523,0.000108476925,0.000112155525,0.0051097646,0.00017054882,0.00018940879,0.00055303477,0.036182802,0.000038966795],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99369437,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9970528,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.078525715,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.078525715,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0875508,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5697466},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128627543","doi":"10.26180/10064861","title":"Between a Rock and a Softer Place: Cartel Settlements in Australia and Canada","year":2019,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"Monash University","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cartel; Discretion; Settlement (finance); Adversarial system; Human settlement; Damages; Incentive","score_opus":0.013101811094637275,"score_gpt":0.2296237614134693,"score_spread":0.21652195031883203,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128627543","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.80021393,0.003541762,0.0008273797,0.031711496,0.00028446983,0.00018290072,0.00013988208,0.000026413854,0.1630718],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96447587,0.0010110559,0.0004400677,0.0036696203,0.000025125155,0.000030069754,0.000041018953,0.000012870938,0.030294329],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9891601,0.0011419402,0.0002403497,0.0007632181,0.0038850508,0.004809402],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9905946,0.001906165,0.00069156254,0.00023629522,0.0029978575,0.00357348],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0040517393,0.00028175671,0.0006232751,0.0027478533,0.03150308,0.011845126,0.003083424,0.0049485443,0.006867361],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014767706,0.0006187281,0.0005194737,0.003615441,0.009406611,0.0022289793,0.006162438,0.0064597367,0.0002473055],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00031765873,0.0004544778,0.07847867,0.00038741497,0.00018775587,0.012614675,0.18506476,0.0035401706,0.0016583097,0.5458134,0.0730184,0.098464325],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015221405,0.00020016012,0.23700115,0.0006551644,0.00019582573,0.0019522735,0.2753528,0.0070579774,0.0014573088,0.018645726,0.4568657,0.0004636875],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99116486,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9972915,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14526609,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.14526609,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.18988553,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9913702},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7128636332","doi":"10.26180/10064861.v1","title":"Between a Rock and a Softer Place: Cartel Settlements in Australia and Canada","year":2019,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"Monash University","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cartel; Discretion; Settlement (finance); Adversarial system; Human settlement; Damages; Incentive","score_opus":0.013101811094637275,"score_gpt":0.2296237614134693,"score_spread":0.21652195031883203,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7128636332","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.80021393,0.003541762,0.0008273797,0.031711496,0.00028446983,0.00018290072,0.00013988208,0.000026413854,0.1630718],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.96447587,0.0010110559,0.0004400677,0.0036696203,0.000025125155,0.000030069754,0.000041018953,0.000012870938,0.030294329],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","domain_scores_codex":[0.9891601,0.0011419402,0.0002403497,0.0007632181,0.0038850508,0.004809402],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9905946,0.001906165,0.00069156254,0.00023629522,0.0029978575,0.00357348],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0040517393,0.00028175671,0.0006232751,0.0027478533,0.03150308,0.011845126,0.003083424,0.0049485443,0.006867361],"category_scores_gemma":[0.014767706,0.0006187281,0.0005194737,0.003615441,0.009406611,0.0022289793,0.006162438,0.0064597367,0.0002473055],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00031765873,0.0004544778,0.07847867,0.00038741497,0.00018775587,0.012614675,0.18506476,0.0035401706,0.0016583097,0.5458134,0.0730184,0.098464325],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00015221405,0.00020016012,0.23700115,0.0006551644,0.00019582573,0.0019522735,0.2753528,0.0070579774,0.0014573088,0.018645726,0.4568657,0.0004636875],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.99116486,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9972915,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14526609,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.14526609,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.18988553,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9913702},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7132370321","doi":"","title":"INHERITANCE RIGHTS OF SPOUSES AND UNMARRIED PARTNERS IN CROATIA","year":2018,"lang":"hr","type":"dissertation","venue":"Repository of the University of Rijeka","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Quarter (Canadian coin); Inheritance (genetic algorithm)","score_opus":0.011614167757941746,"score_gpt":0.2513796961892894,"score_spread":0.23976552843134766,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7132370321","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9864313,0.002510952,0.000097832075,0.0011418917,0.000024351608,0.000013313124,0.000096582895,0.0000016691703,0.009682143],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99721503,0.00049727637,0.00002741504,0.000111895344,0.000008530472,0.0000035403898,0.00002848118,8.4973726e-7,0.0021069979],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9988136,0.00032217256,0.000051997355,0.00008865984,0.00013358911,0.000589984],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983381,0.0002191712,0.0006472362,0.000057795125,0.00014341572,0.0005942965],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015651985,0.000090561654,0.0002601108,0.0008638371,0.002555651,0.001995252,0.00045494517,0.000546502,0.0071223998],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0031643675,0.00016244262,0.00019258652,0.001130578,0.0012566139,0.00086001266,0.0018255137,0.0008737518,0.0003819979],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003662163,0.0002993503,0.8338063,0.000112714166,0.00007393075,0.0013544061,0.033053175,0.00037312723,0.000406035,0.047352582,0.003352595,0.0794497],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000055443576,0.0001256326,0.9222625,0.00034161512,0.0000394331,0.00055121107,0.049983956,0.00042479936,0.00016991641,0.003498417,0.022522476,0.000024799117],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.12307399,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.18578036,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.12307399,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018900486,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034895572,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.24471527},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7132439577","doi":"","title":"Marriage - changes in family law and civil registry","year":2021,"lang":"hr","type":"dissertation","venue":"Repository Faculty of Law University of Zagreb","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Face (sociological concept); Value (mathematics); Quarter (Canadian coin)","score_opus":0.02082760070460423,"score_gpt":0.2601412566809708,"score_spread":0.23931365597636658,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7132439577","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.86675763,0.0028852473,0.0015515442,0.015015484,0.00020009716,0.00008665178,0.0013550365,0.00004961488,0.11209859],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9914321,0.0003046527,0.000086750275,0.00018904736,0.00003562554,0.000010036827,0.00014139131,0.0000068376116,0.00779361],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.996655,0.0013538492,0.00022942382,0.00046206312,0.00045294108,0.00084679143],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9884559,0.0038360378,0.003910654,0.00080474385,0.00097167003,0.002021046],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039352276,0.00009042531,0.00023390175,0.0015942985,0.0018745994,0.0039533544,0.00094206334,0.00088925817,0.032235414],"category_scores_gemma":[0.021726208,0.00019225792,0.00045398434,0.0026761997,0.0026609139,0.0030957283,0.0028795511,0.0015741355,0.0020554985],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00034172824,0.00053624145,0.693922,0.000071142924,0.000064835884,0.00061530975,0.011956284,0.00085495395,0.00018642673,0.2195645,0.00815169,0.063734904],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000041401563,0.00027055896,0.9169061,0.00014539754,0.00004972719,0.00037666023,0.017472617,0.0013491166,0.00034812794,0.02413134,0.038867716,0.000041107705],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03398527,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03884301,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.03398527,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0033864004,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0033351772,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.10783821},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7132490994","doi":"","title":"COMPULSORY CIVIL MARRIAGE IN THE REPUBLIC OF CROATIA FROM 1946 TO 1998","year":2016,"lang":"hr","type":"dissertation","venue":"Repository of the University of Rijeka","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"The Republic; Quarter (Canadian coin); Russian federation","score_opus":0.01058440772219309,"score_gpt":0.22746208628574155,"score_spread":0.21687767856354845,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7132490994","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.98564017,0.002795775,0.0000848033,0.0012186209,0.00013540858,0.000052970354,0.0022553392,0.000012118452,0.007804751],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.98818016,0.001592041,0.00009239742,0.00026388885,0.00007216398,0.00004360726,0.0022648126,0.000010152513,0.007480738],"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","domain_scores_codex":[0.9985297,0.00018551217,0.00009017341,0.00013662188,0.00020369669,0.00085433724],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99675083,0.00020235014,0.001319831,0.0000941644,0.0005902171,0.0010426494],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001571927,0.00025537942,0.00047158368,0.00223736,0.002950156,0.0021092442,0.0014737212,0.0007301561,0.006655693],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0035980514,0.0003700917,0.00039137877,0.0044300933,0.0008682205,0.00083631586,0.0029725118,0.002095498,0.0010915733],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00036178814,0.00029026586,0.9407186,0.00017679445,0.000054014934,0.00032823416,0.006546547,0.00020917079,0.0001865006,0.0012910939,0.0074470197,0.042389963],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000011624678,0.000048332153,0.98659885,0.00009210364,0.000009456062,0.0001063874,0.004872643,0.00004666535,0.000042769312,0.00004089757,0.00812377,0.0000065052513],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.27392426,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.44875732,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.27392426,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0034432868,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0054605873,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.54465973},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7132994659","doi":"","title":"Globalization, federalism and Canadian private international law","year":2003,"lang":"","type":"dissertation","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Federalism; State (computer science); Negotiation; Conflict of laws; Convention; International law; Globalization; Enforcement; Comity","score_opus":0.015460998178530331,"score_gpt":0.3394112510056028,"score_spread":0.3239502528270725,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7132994659","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.07951972,0.008263063,0.0017060707,0.05677303,0.00023075641,0.000028515044,0.00016453149,0.000041909796,0.8532723],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.94919807,0.005586527,0.00095854345,0.0030205403,0.00007972538,0.000016433725,0.000086278786,0.000020433738,0.04103338],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.998099,0.0002161627,0.000026628166,0.00015238476,0.000734178,0.0007716076],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986858,0.00033343153,0.00010734317,0.0000754738,0.00051030517,0.00028766546],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013704565,0.00020222177,0.00022610686,0.0017837926,0.0153792845,0.007372809,0.00080429134,0.001400493,0.006247088],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004198899,0.00018253535,0.00021840275,0.0027539846,0.018132577,0.0024630467,0.0028076156,0.00240254,0.00018422178],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000036129468,0.0000033272634,0.00053502026,0.000011184754,0.0000011608356,0.000027318356,0.0033714224,0.00019396433,0.00002833222,0.98568964,0.0051452764,0.004989858],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000020860904,0.000010609829,0.017159447,0.00023491179,0.000019760615,0.00011052343,0.016796492,0.001551403,0.00021849044,0.49958983,0.46424377,0.000043900844],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.97504413,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9833784,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09764904,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09764904,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09739459,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7084967},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7133028849","doi":"","title":"Child support obligations of step-parents in Canada","year":2006,"lang":"","type":"dissertation","venue":"TSpace","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; Library and Archives Canada","funders":"","keywords":"Child support; Discretion; De facto; Family law; Child custody; Common law","score_opus":0.012635887259745819,"score_gpt":0.3243500185046148,"score_spread":0.311714131244869,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7133028849","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.76677585,0.0028878222,0.00053781277,0.021297742,0.00011504367,0.0000971094,0.0005415356,0.000018404055,0.20772868],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9885132,0.0011333498,0.00026223893,0.0013980481,0.0000060919715,0.000015359316,0.0000805387,0.0000039985703,0.00858708],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99602246,0.00039100045,0.00008188337,0.000232983,0.0013747225,0.0018968582],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9946792,0.00075763866,0.00041000138,0.00013728808,0.0022064478,0.0018093768],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0019967556,0.00012987519,0.00026413787,0.0008841939,0.017003201,0.004001232,0.0012961254,0.0011219649,0.004943159],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007839164,0.0002176519,0.00020803142,0.0020052972,0.0046017417,0.001151986,0.0030006731,0.001905351,0.00015620889],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00013007165,0.000096191856,0.13507551,0.00014602204,0.0000435027,0.0024634618,0.20698395,0.0011002877,0.0008798944,0.5260375,0.046634678,0.08040897],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000056495537,0.00006665777,0.263775,0.0009097267,0.00007103314,0.00080584607,0.32831308,0.0018150117,0.00095398346,0.03479244,0.36825797,0.00018278668],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9920095,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9965906,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.10705388,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.10705388,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.20570958,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.77673393},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7133419607","doi":"","title":"Allocation of Cases Based on Geography","year":2024,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"CityU Scholars","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Plaintiff; Mainland; Focus (optics); Mainland China; Section (typography)","score_opus":0.030827481323398364,"score_gpt":0.29926273200423925,"score_spread":0.2684352506808409,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7133419607","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.025658885,0.0060077985,0.033182897,0.0057092668,0.0006261866,0.0008470204,0.00018677239,0.0001399234,0.92764115],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6854524,0.010464526,0.0415662,0.005230509,0.0007729355,0.0023059489,0.0005030907,0.00029789686,0.25340647],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9822282,0.008310331,0.00061933196,0.000988125,0.0061891186,0.001664956],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99497485,0.0028369827,0.00038431096,0.00059955165,0.00086972263,0.00033451326],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007244733,0.0005120092,0.00070287235,0.0066666855,0.003569071,0.008049155,0.002076642,0.0016240329,0.017266179],"category_scores_gemma":[0.017549707,0.0004908066,0.000682526,0.0044410094,0.008081103,0.006031078,0.007656989,0.0023826645,0.0029511254],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000017560267,0.0000181848,0.0007776434,0.00006840708,0.0000071808886,0.00012729195,0.00180062,0.0014701159,0.00033062833,0.94815105,0.011514663,0.03571661],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003998376,0.00009811107,0.0060771685,0.00097054406,0.000031663287,0.0006323204,0.010600256,0.0040347944,0.0011279626,0.4758935,0.50042284,0.000070892005],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0036690107,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008194034,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.017266179,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0075808815,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.004436736,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.057761133},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7135223398","doi":"10.18572/2072-4152-2025-7-32-37","title":"A CONFLICT OF INTERESTS IN THE PRACTICE OF LAW (A COMPARATIVE LAW STUDY)","year":2025,"lang":"","type":"article","venue":"Justice of the peace","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Settlement (finance); Comparative law; Supreme court; Practice of law; Common law; Conflict of laws; Legal profession","score_opus":0.07092890673757644,"score_gpt":0.41910300291284786,"score_spread":0.3481740961752714,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7135223398","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.18745612,0.077894256,0.0028735143,0.050929923,0.0006196739,0.00013403689,0.000058204783,0.000010627036,0.6800237],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9743928,0.014313447,0.00062755926,0.001742292,0.0001370107,0.0000663499,0.000015720156,0.000011022203,0.008693786],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9884155,0.008095666,0.00018314533,0.0003695621,0.0014002162,0.0015359701],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9890047,0.008286383,0.00057049404,0.00020475459,0.0009951765,0.000938514],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009791127,0.00028929513,0.00043990393,0.004395188,0.019263443,0.015508394,0.001100925,0.0044281553,0.0054433527],"category_scores_gemma":[0.013713275,0.00025788837,0.00025400403,0.0068493388,0.05586568,0.0072946968,0.0049601994,0.003399296,0.0002791806],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001076744,0.00004616139,0.0017425289,0.00012178259,0.0000065719114,0.00047119288,0.15818173,0.00008889715,0.00006924935,0.8185078,0.0036100135,0.017143434],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000024362243,0.00009647057,0.020399854,0.0028222925,0.000028928564,0.0010747865,0.5845437,0.00033004687,0.00015064488,0.14158092,0.24890196,0.000045935816],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.23924442,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3342061,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23924442,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.039082848,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.028424704,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.47570372},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7135605321","doi":"","title":"The parties know better - some comments on the dispute resolution provisions in the draft AB 18","year":2018,"lang":"da","type":"article","venue":"Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen)","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Institute on Governance","funders":"","keywords":"Dispute resolution; Online dispute resolution; Alternative dispute resolution; Dispute mechanism; Legislation; Dispute board","score_opus":0.0785568585040894,"score_gpt":0.33115284339705836,"score_spread":0.25259598489296897,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7135605321","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.004296326,0.0013593826,0.009889546,0.8499004,0.03414188,0.00068243814,0.00054704054,0.00028765755,0.09889531],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.05175064,0.0012959131,0.013281614,0.7026842,0.0153782945,0.0015494341,0.000353552,0.0006898382,0.21301648],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9220221,0.028295288,0.010186381,0.0056233485,0.019967107,0.013905716],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8107899,0.13918051,0.0040166164,0.007868898,0.0348005,0.0033435288],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06315651,0.0014453249,0.0022213894,0.0016528803,0.02089452,0.019853216,0.007834399,0.09510881,0.027943382],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2681555,0.002794479,0.0034008862,0.0023054837,0.011596701,0.014844915,0.009131085,0.07298998,0.01252178],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00022968311,0.00008356698,0.00043609418,0.00024400643,0.00003486744,0.0007615321,0.012439752,0.00031936917,0.0013989985,0.2913692,0.6852617,0.0074212723],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000117892814,0.00006616052,0.001259517,0.0008121846,0.00006053839,0.000161994,0.008663322,0.0007990962,0.0014922647,0.052215002,0.93407965,0.0002723507],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.07102539,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08052693,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09510881,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.015182843,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.025731262,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3340075},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7138825029","doi":"","title":"La fin des avouées et avoués, et après… La reconfiguration du marché des causes d’appel en droit de la famille","year":2025,"lang":"fr","type":"book-chapter","venue":"","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Context (archaeology); Independence (probability theory); Power (physics); Class (philosophy); Order (exchange)","score_opus":0.03425846064433743,"score_gpt":0.3007004093995047,"score_spread":0.2664419487551673,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7138825029","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.04343061,0.008333205,0.0025465912,0.0708636,0.002489004,0.000031093183,0.00016561543,0.000051914198,0.87208825],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.52900213,0.0036530967,0.0011485735,0.0057964777,0.0008729433,0.000049735678,0.00009955634,0.00012076489,0.4592567],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99693155,0.0010265352,0.00007185374,0.00030007723,0.0006258639,0.0010440554],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982691,0.00072319945,0.00017031176,0.00010030958,0.00039217732,0.00034483543],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030105007,0.0003633179,0.00026324636,0.0009552804,0.008992076,0.0052659903,0.0009548036,0.0031909083,0.019441066],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0074569085,0.00045837736,0.00039965843,0.0007658785,0.009198808,0.0040355125,0.002453259,0.0063273204,0.002008334],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000033160475,0.00003130476,0.0033961476,0.00005285342,0.0000116713245,0.00084302487,0.08775584,0.00017964309,0.0004400851,0.7555728,0.105520956,0.046162374],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000074475115,0.000028474182,0.007659216,0.0002810494,0.0000054839406,0.00045616622,0.042125,0.00007597288,0.00022891577,0.037760183,0.91134787,0.00002431126],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.14569359,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.19562906,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14569359,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008830766,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0098917335,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.28969115},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7143407263","doi":"10.70675/6bd01173z67ebz4a5ezb3c9zed5eebf49e2b","title":"Le droit de l'OHADA face au commerce électronique","year":2011,"lang":"","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Economic Justice; Face (sociological concept); Context (archaeology); Legal certainty","score_opus":0.017947021489239854,"score_gpt":0.30360834222223504,"score_spread":0.28566132073299516,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7143407263","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.055606574,0.018014004,0.020599535,0.099752404,0.00255456,0.000054783373,0.0001544674,0.00006697001,0.80319667],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8113813,0.014348531,0.0051770825,0.011370476,0.00081829674,0.00009896818,0.00010629995,0.000076912314,0.15662217],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9950749,0.0017408575,0.00015565119,0.0005496968,0.00174203,0.00073681265],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99623775,0.0017724247,0.00030098978,0.00048312446,0.00096099556,0.00024473306],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0039047864,0.00036477798,0.00047831,0.0015386282,0.009028778,0.018395226,0.0014485326,0.0051160757,0.018190213],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006789874,0.00036082973,0.00047329522,0.0019480444,0.019200489,0.0114682345,0.0058158226,0.0053017037,0.0016573044],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000011391418,0.0000051472516,0.00044255785,0.00008166799,0.000004180482,0.00018529435,0.007023741,0.00012665379,0.00015297701,0.98065096,0.004407852,0.0069075716],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000012926725,0.000027495262,0.0028630865,0.0010830441,0.000016361557,0.000599846,0.032686953,0.0003222074,0.00052620063,0.23120983,0.7306106,0.00004138679],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04201283,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.046014566,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04201283,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.010405201,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008988236,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.083536625},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7144397256","doi":"","title":"Gian Paolo Romano, Le dilemme du renvoi en droit international privé : la thèse, l'antithèse et la recherche d'une synthèse","year":2021,"lang":"ja","type":"article","venue":"Institutional Repositories DataBase (IRDB)","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":true,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"Privy Council Office","funders":"","keywords":"Work (physics); Order (exchange); Context (archaeology)","score_opus":0.06579056865118027,"score_gpt":0.35512208077832247,"score_spread":0.2893315121271422,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7144397256","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0015190591,0.15219611,0.0024418205,0.7962145,0.011332083,0.000041299652,0.0019724255,0.00013856553,0.034144137],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.10525754,0.34468526,0.021392584,0.25627646,0.024714887,0.0006313681,0.0056098276,0.0013744931,0.24005753],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99105585,0.0036829754,0.00047528042,0.00089974934,0.003208599,0.00067751424],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9846598,0.008877767,0.0012559427,0.00089892413,0.0035203635,0.00078719674],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.011664593,0.00057658344,0.00083231344,0.003877571,0.003396367,0.011120126,0.0022888256,0.00762345,0.017340943],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03992909,0.0005984329,0.0005675071,0.0066209766,0.0032122063,0.011198563,0.0035323515,0.007015887,0.005594149],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000036351088,0.000019734664,0.00059539295,0.00030718037,0.000015052939,0.00005432208,0.00089404185,0.000086141255,0.000051331346,0.09817154,0.8689044,0.03086452],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000017283483,0.0000066550883,0.0016624979,0.0010871892,0.000016499944,0.00008361314,0.0008749484,0.00011545625,0.00016066043,0.018077036,0.97787344,0.000024651896],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.06651586,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.09212067,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06651586,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00513557,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.015008417,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1322574},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7153400476","doi":"","title":"Droit français - droit québécois inspirations mutuelles","year":2019,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"TRIPS architecture; Human rights; Confidentiality","score_opus":0.011333802927681142,"score_gpt":0.23084454358820178,"score_spread":0.21951074066052065,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7153400476","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0024229307,0.021792673,0.00068739126,0.017151618,0.00552144,0.000031343396,0.0002686846,0.00007762619,0.9520463],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.010206597,0.0034345528,0.0001797791,0.0010645913,0.00029391618,0.000012730588,0.000055945457,0.000053812073,0.984698],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99931407,0.00014304399,0.000014506765,0.00008361693,0.0002681507,0.00017660424],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994823,0.00009602872,0.000015517699,0.000031327276,0.0002748281,0.0000999624],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00086071406,0.0011002142,0.00056966755,0.0019074652,0.009929253,0.007738902,0.00068952155,0.0021906204,0.0798755],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0013452729,0.00031672517,0.00042516805,0.0024689832,0.0032671045,0.0028636043,0.0018412918,0.0035742791,0.0091475025],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000026824786,0.000015653566,0.00023704825,0.00007257523,0.000005670654,0.00022104423,0.0035020704,0.00016791877,0.00020428613,0.26900977,0.68547994,0.041057162],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000013521869,0.0000015422149,0.00021259117,0.00004669999,0.0000015048153,0.000035926627,0.00040395747,0.000035653913,0.000029244096,0.0018007344,0.9974274,0.0000033698693],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7726169,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8906152,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.22738308,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.030396553,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01797809,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4574443},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7161773259","doi":"10.82308/34131","title":"Jurisdictional fairness and freezing measures : an analysis in Canadian private international law","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisdiction; Conflict of laws; Scope (computer science); Subject-matter jurisdiction; Exclusive jurisdiction","score_opus":0.0148599611187937,"score_gpt":0.30814532722215227,"score_spread":0.2932853661033586,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7161773259","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.23574615,0.0072056246,0.007107093,0.01393363,0.00017247818,0.00026261734,0.0006273955,0.00006684526,0.7348781],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9679345,0.002764699,0.0025500844,0.0010092707,0.000045654484,0.00005876728,0.00015552953,0.00003540048,0.025446137],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.990266,0.000781812,0.00017256795,0.00047015402,0.005012698,0.0032967005],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99346006,0.0016116182,0.0004789013,0.00030074283,0.0034861353,0.00066248374],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0041176714,0.00042333818,0.00059648027,0.0073822928,0.015685042,0.00845243,0.0025850702,0.0019966909,0.00766045],"category_scores_gemma":[0.019212952,0.00038525937,0.00079066114,0.011130774,0.011591793,0.0028008977,0.0030690343,0.003032583,0.00020993152],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008748353,0.000011489297,0.0029960624,0.00004010461,0.000009946488,0.00008967467,0.004078993,0.0011940021,0.00007206641,0.9784727,0.0039906297,0.009035559],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007302277,0.000066679626,0.14717844,0.0012535413,0.00032143813,0.00041781523,0.038333926,0.019204954,0.0008389246,0.4443627,0.3476463,0.00030236747],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.98619616,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9905263,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.14040902,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.14040902,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.11282834,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9970037},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7161849637","doi":"10.82308/31648","title":"A new pair of glasses for conflicts of jurisdiction in Brazil: seeing the principle of proximity with Canadian lenses","year":2023,"lang":"en","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Conflict of laws; Jurisdiction; International arbitration; Good faith; Lien","score_opus":0.02630039433654809,"score_gpt":0.3395459626128943,"score_spread":0.31324556827634625,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7161849637","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13534366,0.003586847,0.03276776,0.049096454,0.0006163398,0.0002666669,0.00042676408,0.000119597724,0.7777759],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9492234,0.000911545,0.007858782,0.00147632,0.000046209414,0.0000666119,0.000057037396,0.000052660092,0.040307455],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9983065,0.00045564174,0.000046149573,0.0003111728,0.00041056244,0.0004699613],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983595,0.0004289161,0.00017560327,0.00026756543,0.00044091453,0.0003275624],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0016958613,0.0004515899,0.00042470946,0.0022674848,0.014218695,0.008300091,0.0012512048,0.0032350514,0.015170721],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007231798,0.00036662223,0.00081267976,0.0019916005,0.016299183,0.0068562315,0.0049850335,0.003117611,0.0005717267],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010895509,0.0000049809596,0.0011769771,0.00003091337,0.000004377471,0.00018247041,0.011440104,0.00026699578,0.00017124171,0.97399646,0.003586741,0.009127759],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004169021,0.000046588746,0.013188722,0.00042702988,0.00006307107,0.00081410486,0.06385986,0.0038103708,0.00072470226,0.57029116,0.34658116,0.00015149583],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7606441,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8744524,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.23935592,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03173755,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02855458,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.48153102},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7161953416","doi":"10.82308/39830","title":"Droit international privé et cyberespace: fondements d'une approche renouvelée","year":2013,"lang":"fr","type":"dissertation","venue":"","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Cyberspace; Conflict of laws; Jurisdiction; Private law; Context (archaeology); Choice of law; International law; Field (mathematics)","score_opus":0.019317125600591668,"score_gpt":0.3206740955609809,"score_spread":0.30135696996038924,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7161953416","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0053498037,0.098240346,0.03199282,0.49031293,0.020841883,0.00011569992,0.00011060904,0.00029091578,0.35274503],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.32404432,0.12885296,0.039386693,0.16907935,0.022752117,0.0004931754,0.00023325311,0.0006566272,0.3145015],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.97609246,0.008137198,0.0006638683,0.0029254283,0.010148012,0.002033062],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98473847,0.0077833314,0.00043332326,0.0014685955,0.00454689,0.0010294485],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.019256404,0.0010360571,0.00092273037,0.0032385818,0.007694926,0.022422796,0.003799582,0.017565664,0.0072434405],"category_scores_gemma":[0.022331636,0.0006677525,0.001271485,0.0029281264,0.018159451,0.016090134,0.0074375896,0.022218559,0.0025488362],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000010785865,0.00001653461,0.00020154886,0.00009266946,0.000008132519,0.00010902234,0.0030795156,0.00027396114,0.00009581942,0.9311225,0.040495455,0.024494173],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009371314,0.000012830292,0.00023561627,0.0006364877,0.000012168416,0.000115413844,0.0012407217,0.00047813967,0.00014296835,0.06946882,0.92761797,0.000029369392],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.092773564,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.07094514,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.092773564,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01896011,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.028684145,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.18446714},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W7162512094","doi":"10.5749/9781452954684-014","title":"Conclusion. A Land Claim Is Canada’S Claim","year":2010,"lang":"","type":"book-chapter","venue":"University of Minnesota Press eBooks","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"","score_opus":0.02215871185098925,"score_gpt":0.21478694123489978,"score_spread":0.19262822938391053,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W7162512094","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.011785372,0.002258079,0.0015532644,0.18411002,0.0023097624,0.00007709038,0.0012431646,0.00005985277,0.7966033],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.36388266,0.002152604,0.001456526,0.16990446,0.001325508,0.000091672686,0.0005840983,0.00008608404,0.46051642],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.997463,0.00013069055,0.00007511092,0.00040267082,0.001094946,0.0008335882],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964568,0.00067979336,0.00010486547,0.00009674249,0.002353574,0.00030817857],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0015328621,0.00042233273,0.00051629613,0.001836573,0.009815052,0.007911085,0.0019270859,0.009063437,0.03596776],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0060838857,0.0002960604,0.0007027823,0.0016459321,0.008571685,0.0032283312,0.0016040158,0.008307438,0.004031555],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000025024136,0.000014428831,0.00070603477,0.000046420082,0.000014985493,0.00021219841,0.0015114826,0.00013871818,0.00012298813,0.77421105,0.21774921,0.0052475585],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003770027,0.0000080645705,0.0029883326,0.00032079933,0.00006323573,0.00016075456,0.0060977624,0.0003967978,0.0005192612,0.18887831,0.8004672,0.00006182569],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9227146,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9293477,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07728541,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03626269,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.062315073,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.26310545},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W751935596","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.2822","title":"Book Review: Property and Sovereignty: Legal and Cultural Perspectives, by James Charles Smith (ed)","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Sovereignty; Property (philosophy); Cultural property; Law; Law and economics; Sociology; Political science; Environmental ethics; Philosophy; Epistemology; Cultural heritage","score_opus":0.018785126942324343,"score_gpt":0.2842859793379544,"score_spread":0.26550085239563004,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W751935596","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.000041072297,0.9653028,0.000108629225,0.01587274,0.012953012,0.0000067849514,0.00009172665,0.000013182707,0.005609976],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0008195146,0.94032687,0.00024544407,0.01307801,0.017795205,0.00003531805,0.00017339778,0.000024070949,0.027502207],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9992968,0.00012936583,0.00006463103,0.000086398984,0.00037439275,0.000048332873],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99688536,0.0017077904,0.00021991384,0.000057528807,0.00094434916,0.00018488003],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001256305,0.0012333267,0.0018922123,0.0048989276,0.0009500758,0.0040794495,0.0016629036,0.003723458,0.019314418],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0060497895,0.00069063826,0.0006668383,0.009897279,0.0016546493,0.00459659,0.0013317695,0.003634999,0.010933279],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006422903,0.0000056254066,0.000033302284,0.0006858049,0.000008975496,0.000015927626,0.000023516552,0.000035298017,0.000025578396,0.0011913729,0.96307236,0.03489577],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007715345,0.0000071341883,0.0002417043,0.0013560032,0.0000150869955,0.00012094883,0.00004572885,0.000019805382,0.0000205012,0.0013515678,0.9968071,0.000006826382],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0151136555,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.052245118,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.019314418,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0027030895,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.006235273,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.064613104},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W770072493","doi":"10.1093/9780198727255.001.0001","title":"The International Protection of Adults","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"book","venue":"","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Commonwealth; Jurisdiction; Conflict of laws; Convention; Work (physics); Common law; Political science; Law; Engineering","score_opus":0.03187358128743832,"score_gpt":0.2944128736517059,"score_spread":0.26253929236426754,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W770072493","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.00061557756,0.00948191,0.00038364794,0.009302605,0.0028313582,0.00002460906,0.000106375686,0.000030865795,0.9772231],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.02255399,0.011522459,0.00072653696,0.011995145,0.0018400566,0.00010606247,0.00030803468,0.00009452799,0.9508532],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99884015,0.00028274578,0.000057498484,0.00017469205,0.00040672702,0.00023813806],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993216,0.0002003875,0.00005250538,0.0001328364,0.00017931315,0.0001134193],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00097408105,0.0005595272,0.0003820926,0.00081972894,0.002902098,0.004692892,0.0007125733,0.0027569418,0.048582602],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003327747,0.00023279001,0.00036723822,0.0009380056,0.0031466356,0.0035096167,0.0038395368,0.004204613,0.015427174],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008621214,0.000014920377,0.00020415736,0.00009451946,0.0000025250731,0.000107859196,0.0044732452,0.00005274827,0.000081292186,0.4089611,0.5147612,0.071237914],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000012003188,0.0000035350934,0.0002035978,0.00021455664,8.763967e-7,0.00005687815,0.00039693416,0.000009162324,0.00002130038,0.006508519,0.99258125,0.0000020261245],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0076599675,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.009379573,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.048582602,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0018529078,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0034803138,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.16252506},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W77547115","doi":"","title":"Futile or fruitful: the charter and the decision to withhold or withdraw life-sustaining treatment.","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"PubMed","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Statute; Charter; Directive; Law; Health care; Best interests; Medicine; Political science","score_opus":0.040946052541163555,"score_gpt":0.29802132205878523,"score_spread":0.25707526951762166,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W77547115","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.0053433515,0.086979635,0.0029919236,0.72966844,0.008911954,0.00009310757,0.00025992078,0.000055130226,0.16569646],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.55082035,0.14034645,0.0078638885,0.18532427,0.021666756,0.00028361176,0.0004577736,0.00010924927,0.09312766],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9948639,0.0024718496,0.0001614266,0.00027071274,0.0014532316,0.0007788463],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.98400223,0.010157064,0.0012694042,0.0002974272,0.001647231,0.0026266396],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007474342,0.00036928675,0.00035595743,0.0010857696,0.003618569,0.0057212096,0.0015476252,0.008550744,0.009443424],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03680564,0.00022562341,0.00034248523,0.000888043,0.013553847,0.004244458,0.0022879667,0.0108182235,0.00092770316],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009106274,0.000053163963,0.0020291444,0.00020044326,0.000008216841,0.00088195544,0.0024667536,0.0005453156,0.000043426102,0.5010762,0.37770244,0.11490195],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004150566,0.00007644091,0.0037031649,0.0024256145,0.000023060658,0.0024938656,0.0043344493,0.00120044,0.00011020695,0.3376013,0.647908,0.00008201781],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.11956938,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.22540528,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.11956938,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01557659,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04198105,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.23774683},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W77558344","doi":"","title":"Chronique de droit international privé canadien","year":2010,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"Journal du droit international","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science","score_opus":0.008449559125953647,"score_gpt":0.2758843348218272,"score_spread":0.2674347756958736,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W77558344","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.14600585,0.0970498,0.0024214888,0.06089328,0.021374121,0.00027956953,0.033807892,0.00079701166,0.6373711],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5998206,0.04405483,0.0023495324,0.0069849896,0.005219667,0.0004779088,0.015673816,0.0004619672,0.32495666],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.9977654,0.00034258055,0.00020403424,0.0002333876,0.00077116396,0.0006834796],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99568236,0.0012173401,0.0007964679,0.00013714218,0.0013712688,0.00079544005],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0011105044,0.00042373146,0.0004003261,0.0052028904,0.0027831635,0.0049566776,0.0005277681,0.0015110824,0.05443411],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0067800283,0.00036751071,0.0004666912,0.005005145,0.0011987226,0.0024032372,0.001649549,0.004483006,0.005230245],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.00085151324,0.00019478519,0.040328793,0.0016895694,0.00011269325,0.0032903373,0.010773857,0.0010340945,0.0014195022,0.2853395,0.51127845,0.14368695],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000145248905,0.000028255796,0.030461151,0.0003561892,0.0000117036,0.00064516946,0.0024039436,0.000064449785,0.00034999245,0.0016143532,0.9640292,0.000021066622],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.09734734,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.095362015,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9026527,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006309723,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0069995024,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.19356143},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W77651103","doi":"","title":"Gracefulness of n-cone Cm v Kcn.","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ars Combinatoria","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":true,"route_about_ca":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematics; Cone (formal languages); Pure mathematics; Combinatorics; Algorithm","score_opus":0.017482517811680212,"score_gpt":0.28205087288481795,"score_spread":0.26456835507313775,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W77651103","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.28390113,0.00088433037,0.12073503,0.0033965379,0.0005495731,0.00014750453,0.0013581216,0.0006780286,0.58834976],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.95396215,0.00031212877,0.009765869,0.00051171513,0.00014625204,0.00007517534,0.000537015,0.00015238323,0.034537315],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99861896,0.0002555601,0.00008760307,0.00030543338,0.0003540843,0.00037840902],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99639755,0.0013377257,0.0004045204,0.00057334395,0.00073115807,0.00055566634],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0013416589,0.00038377018,0.0005861921,0.0015752787,0.0031153874,0.0041078962,0.0011270558,0.0008648409,0.014874831],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005061393,0.00032528723,0.0007994792,0.0011382885,0.004285855,0.0051115267,0.003011543,0.002114041,0.0013164474],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000021906846,0.0000071329982,0.00022772727,0.000016180693,0.000005038963,0.0000594634,0.0001222107,0.0003606046,0.00017792577,0.9944989,0.00150083,0.0030020766],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000013058222,0.000007760254,0.00036241807,0.000015477488,0.000006230885,0.00013211701,0.00014782976,0.0016718772,0.00027147922,0.9896959,0.0076658125,0.000009995028],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0075075817,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0065799677,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.014874831,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0023668387,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0015668597,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.049761295},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W847674796","doi":"","title":"Canadian Supreme Court, SoCan v. Canadian Association of Internet Providers","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; The Internet; Political science; Law; Association (psychology); Computer science; Psychology","score_opus":0.018083061155471727,"score_gpt":0.25254381462586545,"score_spread":0.23446075347039372,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W847674796","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.026470622,0.005180664,0.0012577546,0.26317987,0.0026406294,0.00027222262,0.00585866,0.00019382223,0.69494575],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.22871013,0.0040411395,0.0022050347,0.22222045,0.0008324889,0.00031137918,0.0015621826,0.00014140611,0.5399758],"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","domain_scores_codex":[0.99458945,0.0002572594,0.00013036354,0.00043219925,0.0029861378,0.0016044832],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.99424124,0.0012001109,0.00016590014,0.00017345825,0.0032100768,0.0010092353],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0028383662,0.00049907435,0.0005825668,0.0020652039,0.031468686,0.010055857,0.0026507946,0.015405917,0.01619455],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01163198,0.0009184452,0.00091305125,0.0037614573,0.0029820434,0.002180327,0.001655721,0.010699026,0.0015087941],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000058129375,0.00003939312,0.002713374,0.0000494519,0.000030296585,0.00039950595,0.0014468181,0.00033371616,0.00031679065,0.21643996,0.7704889,0.0076835463],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00010798547,0.00001860939,0.013504081,0.00023086008,0.00014445408,0.00018061876,0.0022146013,0.0011116314,0.00045071464,0.020601545,0.9612822,0.00015267989],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9845954,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.99555475,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07263375,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07263375,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.17280322,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5269972},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W854690614","doi":"10.71781/2522","title":"La désignation de la loi applicable en matière de successions internationales : la professio juris en droit international privé québécois et comparé","year":2012,"lang":"fr","type":"dissertation","venue":"Open MIND","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Philosophy","score_opus":0.02269715151132467,"score_gpt":0.3884320344193233,"score_spread":0.3657348829079986,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W854690614","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.13309045,0.001979114,0.008942972,0.012279688,0.00023132878,0.00010511211,0.0000798095,0.000068105495,0.8432234],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8518001,0.000687233,0.0020817148,0.0012663007,0.00005332156,0.0000860735,0.00003751261,0.000060305705,0.14392751],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","domain_scores_codex":[0.99651176,0.00071450777,0.00007591435,0.0003802598,0.0008891862,0.001428393],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9980661,0.0003331001,0.00016414575,0.0001517848,0.0007152913,0.00056949846],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0030239625,0.0004406829,0.000300238,0.0019490765,0.011983716,0.008257223,0.0012018541,0.0017653082,0.010026834],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003992032,0.00032719134,0.00039838528,0.0014807322,0.014956715,0.002727298,0.003837617,0.004616513,0.00050824904],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.000013227912,0.000011537502,0.002457628,0.000028089937,0.000004502962,0.00023475988,0.01904463,0.00024768687,0.0003094256,0.962887,0.0035959887,0.011165507],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000034253713,0.00011449875,0.04268281,0.0006310904,0.00003822353,0.00050523557,0.055203166,0.0019594799,0.0013642577,0.115007035,0.7823493,0.000110649875],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6056471,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7996671,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3943529,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.04343836,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.036256485,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7933507},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null},{"id":"W978723205","doi":"","title":"Interest-Based Negotiations in Multi-Party Disputes as an Alternative to Litigation in Aboriginal Cases in Canada:A Case Study","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Conflict of Laws and Jurisdiction","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"route_ca_aff":false,"route_ca_fund":false,"route_ca_venue":false,"route_about_ca":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Negotiation; Political science; Law and economics; Law; Business; Economics","score_opus":0.09162068237218847,"score_gpt":0.3867314760308211,"score_spread":0.29511079365863263,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","prediction":{"id":"W978723205","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated","genre_scores_codex":[0.9057634,0.002312331,0.0022024503,0.0034660033,0.00005636296,0.00041792155,0.0000794083,0.000014124388,0.08568801],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9897822,0.0009805779,0.0013600583,0.00032090966,0.000015971575,0.00011946499,0.000022631531,0.000007162097,0.0073909345],"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"case_report","domain_scores_codex":[0.9819556,0.0067862947,0.00045052328,0.0006434704,0.003732564,0.0064315107],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9827765,0.011400829,0.001435386,0.0006051188,0.0022259827,0.0015562108],"candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009922651,0.0006837467,0.00090801937,0.0030650976,0.037174944,0.0105219595,0.0046839784,0.009483934,0.004234518],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02571793,0.00061065634,0.00090799987,0.005981697,0.010110783,0.0034138965,0.005782916,0.006139168,0.0003773207],"study_design_candidate":"case_report","study_design_consensus":null,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"study_design_scores_codex":[0.0016236196,0.0035727369,0.08960184,0.0009461917,0.00023233179,0.050099567,0.33139077,0.010944919,0.0026426618,0.39720917,0.012061547,0.09967466],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008380822,0.0011164465,0.120996736,0.0014100499,0.00077447644,0.0154809905,0.70043874,0.021985292,0.00367492,0.038122576,0.09468117,0.00048050357],"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.90812653,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9582276,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.09187347,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.053613883,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.06705808,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3889978},"labels":[],"label_agreement":null}]}